AMERCO /NV/ (Form: 10-K, Received: 06/06/2012 16:16:56)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

R	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012

£	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission File Number	Registrant, State of Incorporation Address and Telephone Number	I.R.S. Employer Identification No.

1-11255	AMERCO	88-0106815
	(A Nevada Corporation)
	1325 Airmotive Way, Ste. 100
	Reno, Nevada 89502-3239
	Telephone (775) 688-6300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Registrant	Title of Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
AMERCO	Common	NASDAQ

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ No R

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act. Yes £ No R

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes R No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of a “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer £ Accelerated filer R

Non-accelerated filer £ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes £ No R

The aggregate market value of AMERCO common stock held by non-affiliates on September 30, 2011 was $397,885,149. The aggregate market value was computed using the closing price for the common stock trading on NASDAQ on such date. Shares held by executive officers, directors and persons owning directly or indirectly more than 5% of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the preceding number because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

19,607,788 shares of AMERCO common stock, $0.25 par value, were outstanding at June 1, 2012.

Documents incorporated by reference: portions of AMERCO’s definitive proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after AMERCO’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I

Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	12
Item 2.	Properties	12
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	12
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	13

	PART II
Item 5.	Ma rket for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities	14
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	17
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40
Item 8.	F inancial Statements and Supplementary Data	41
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	41
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	41
Item 9B.	Other Information	44

	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	44
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	44
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	44
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transaction, and Director Independence	44
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	44

	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	45

PART I

Item 1. Business

Company Overview

We are North America’s largest “do-it-yourself” moving and storage operator through our subsidiary U-Haul International, Inc. (“U-Haul”). U-Haul is synonymous with “do-it-yourself” moving and storage and is a leader in supplying products and services to help people move and store their household and commercial goods. Our primary service objective is to provide a better and better product or service to more and more people at a lower and lower cost. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “AMERCO,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refers to AMERCO, a Nevada Corporation, and all of its legal subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis.

We were founded in 1945 as a sole proprietorship under the name "U-Haul Trailer Rental Company" and have rented trailers ever since. Starting in 1959, we rented trucks on a one-way and in-town basis exclusively through independent U-Haul dealers. In 1974, we began developing our network of U-Haul managed retail centers, through which we rent our trucks and trailers, self-storage rooms and sell moving and self-storage products and services to complement our independent dealer network.

We rent our distinctive orange and white U-Haul trucks and trailers as well as offer self-storage rooms through a network of 1,450 Company operated retail moving centers and approximately 15,500 independent U-Haul dealers. We also sell U-Haul brand boxes, tape and other moving and self-storage products and services to “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customers at all of our distribution outlets and through our eMove ® web site.

We believe U-Haul is the most convenient supplier of products and services addressing the needs of North America’s “do-it-yourself” moving and storage market. Our broad geographic coverage throughout the United States and Canada and our extensive selection of U-Haul brand moving equipment rentals, self-storage rooms and related moving and storage products and services provide our customers with convenient “one-stop” shopping.

Since 1945 U-Haul has incorporated sustainable practices into its everyday operations. We believe that our basic business premise of equipment sharing helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduces the need for total large capacity vehicles. We continue to look for ways to reduce waste within our business and are dedicated to manufacturing reusable components and recyclable products. We believe that our commitment to sustainability, through our products and services and everyday operations has helped us to reduce our impact on the environment.

Through Repwest Insurance Company (“Repwest”), our property and casualty insurance subsidiary, we manage the property, liability and related insurance claims processing for U-Haul. Oxford Life Insurance Company (“Oxford”), our life insurance subsidiary, sells life insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, annuities and other related products to non U-Haul customers.

Available Information

AMERCO and U-Haul are each incorporated in Nevada. U-Haul’s internet address is uhaul.com. On AMERCO’s investor relations web site, amerco.com, we post the following filings as soon as practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statement related to our annual meeting of stockholders, and any amendments to those reports or statements filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All such filings on our web site are available free of charge. Additionally, you will find these materials on the SEC’s website at sec.gov.

Products and Rental Equipment

Our customers are primarily “do-it-yourself” household movers. U-Haul moving equipment is specifically designed, engineered and manufactured for the “do-it-yourself” household mover. These “do-it-yourself” movers include individuals and families moving their belongings from one home to another, college students moving their belongings, vacationers and sports enthusiasts needing extra space or having special towing needs, people trying to save on home furniture and home appliance delivery costs, and “do-it-yourself” home remodeling and gardening enthusiasts who need to transport materials.

As of March 31, 2012, our rental fleet consisted of approximately 106,000 trucks, 83,000 trailers and 33,000 towing devices. This equipment and our U-Haul brand of self-moving products and services are available through our network of managed retail moving centers and independent U-Haul dealers. Independent U-Haul dealers receive rental equipment from the Company, act as rental agents and are paid a commission based on gross revenues generated from their U-Haul rentals.

Our rental truck chassis are manufactured by domestic and foreign truck manufacturers. These chassis are joined with the U-Haul designed and manufactured van boxes primarily at U-Haul operated manufacturing and assembly facilities strategically located throughout the United States. U-Haul rental trucks feature our proprietary Lowest Deck SM , which provides our customers with extra ease of loading. The loading ramps on our trucks are the widest in the industry, which reduce the effort needed to move belongings. Our trucks are fitted with convenient, padded rub rails with tie downs on every interior wall. Our Gentle Ride Suspension SM helps our customers safely move delicate and prized possessions. Also, the engineers at our U-Haul Technical Center determined that the softest ride in our trucks was at the front of the van box. Consequently, we designed the part of the van box that hangs over the front cab of the truck to be the location for our customers to place their most fragile items during their move. We call this area Mom’s Attic SM .

Our distinctive trailers are also manufactured at these same U-Haul operated manufacturing and assembly facilities. These trailers are well suited to the low profile of many of today’s newly manufactured automobiles. Our engineering staff is committed to making our trailers easy to tow, safe, aerodynamic and fuel efficient.

To provide our self-move customers with added value, our rental trucks and trailers are designed with fuel efficiency in mind. Many of our newer trucks are fitted with fuel economy gauges, another tool that assists our customers in conserving fuel. To help make our rental equipment more reliable, we routinely perform extensive preventive maintenance and repairs.

We also provide customers with equipment to transport their vehicle. We provide two towing options; auto transport, in which all four wheels are off the ground and a tow dolly, in which the front wheels of the towed vehicle are off the ground.

To help our customers load their boxes and larger household appliances and furniture, we offer several accessory rental items. Our utility dolly has a lightweight design and is easy to maneuver. Another rental accessory is our four wheel dolly, which provides a large, flat surface for moving dressers, wall units, pianos and other large household items. U-Haul appliance dollies provide the leverage needed to move refrigerators, freezers, washers and dryers easily and safely. These utility, furniture and appliance dollies, along with the low decks and the wide loading ramps on U-Haul trucks and trailers, are designed for easy loading and unloading of our customers’ belongings.

The total package U-Haul offers the “do-it-yourself” household mover doesn’t end with trucks, trailers and accessory rental items. Our moving supplies include a wide array of affordably priced U-Haul brand boxes, tape and packing materials. We also provide specialty boxes for dishes, computers and sensitive electronic equipment, as well as tape, security locks, and packing supplies. U-Haul brand boxes are specifically sized to make loading easier.

We estimate that U-Haul is North America’s largest seller and installer of hitches and towing systems. In addition to towing U-Haul equipment, these hitching and towing systems can tow jet skis, motorcycles, boats, campers and horse trailers. Our hitches, ball mounts, and hitch balls undergo stringent testing requirements. Each year, more than one million customers visit our locations for expertise on complete towing systems, trailer rentals and the latest in towing accessories.

U-Haul has one of North America’s largest propane refilling networks, with over 1,060 locations providing this convenient service. We employ trained, certified personnel to refill all propane cylinders and alternative fuel vehicles. Our network of propane dispensing locations is one of the largest automobile alternative refueling networks in North America.

Our self-storage business was a natural outgrowth of our self-moving operations. Conveniently located U-Haul self-storage rental facilities provide clean, dry and secure space for storage of household and commercial goods. Storage units range in size from 6 square feet to over 1,000 square feet. We operate 1,140 self-storage locations in North America, with over 423,000 rentable rooms comprising 37.8 million square feet of rentable storage space. Our self-storage centers feature a wide array of security

measures, ranging from electronic property access control gates to individually alarmed storage units. At many centers, we offer climate controlled storage rooms to protect temperature sensitive goods such as video tapes, albums, photographs and precious wood furniture.

Another extension of our strategy to make “do-it-yourself” moving and storage easier is our U-Box TM program. A storage container is delivered to a location of our customer’s choosing either by Company personnel or by the customers themselves through the use of a U-Box trailer. This option provides the customer with the greatest scheduling convenience. Once the container is filled it can be stored at the customer’s location, or taken to any of our corporate locations or moved to a location of the customer’s choice.

Additionally, we offer moving and storage protection packages such as Safemove and Safetow. These programs provide moving and towing customers with a damage waiver, cargo protection and medical and life insurance coverage. Safestor provides protection for storage customers from loss on their goods in storage. For our customers who desire additional coverage over and above the standard Safemove protection, we also offer our Super Safemove product. This package provides the rental customer with a layer of primary liability protection.

Our eMove ® web site, eMove.com, is the largest network of customers and independent businesses in the self-moving and self-storage industry. The eMove network consists of channels where customers, businesses and service providers transact business. The eMove Moving Help marketplace connects “do-it-yourself” movers with independent service providers to assist movers in packing, loading, unloading, cleaning, driving and performing other services. Thousands of independent service providers participate in the eMove network.

Through the eMove Storage Affiliate Program, independent storage businesses can join the world’s largest self-storage reservation system. Self-storage customers making a reservation through eMove can access all of the U-Haul self-storage centers and all of our independent storage affiliate partners for even greater convenience to meet their self-storage needs.

Description of Operating Segments

AMERCO’s three reportable segments are:

·	Moving and Storage, comprised of AMERCO, U-Haul, and Real Estate and the subsidiaries of U-Haul and Real Estate,

·	Property and Casualty Insurance, comprised of Repwest and its subsidiaries and ARCOA, and

·	Life Insurance, comprised of Oxford and its subsidiaries.

Financial information for each of our operating segments is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as part of Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Moving and Storage Operating Segment

Our Moving and Storage operating segment consists of the rental of trucks, trailers, portable storage boxes, specialty rental items and self-storage spaces primarily to the household mover as well as sales of moving supplies, towing accessories and propane. Operations are conducted under the registered trade name U-Haul ® throughout the United States and Canada.

Net revenue from our Moving and Storage operating segment was approximately 86.1%, 88.1% and 90.6% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During fiscal 2012, the Company placed approximately 22,600 new trucks in service. These replacements were a combination of U-Haul manufactured vehicles and purchases. Typically as new trucks are added to the fleet the Company removes older trucks from the fleet. The total number of rental trucks in the fleet increased during fiscal 2012 as we increased the pace of new additions while trucks removed for retirement and sale were generally consistent with fiscal 2011.

Within our truck and trailer rental operation we are focused on expanding our independent dealer network to provide added convenience for our customers. U-Haul maximizes vehicle utilization by effective distribution of the truck and trailer fleets among the 1,450 Company operated centers and approximately 15,500 independent dealers. Utilizing its proprietary reservations management system, the

Company’s centers and dealers electronically report their inventory in real-time, which facilitates matching equipment to customer demand. Approximately 55% of all U-Move rental revenue originates from the Company operated centers.

At our owned and operated retail centers we are implementing new initiatives to improve customer service. These initiatives include improving management of our rental equipment to provide our retail centers with the right type of rental equipment, at the right time and at the most convenient location for our customers, effective marketing of our broad line of self-moving related products and services, maintaining longer hours of operation to provide more convenience to our customers, and enhancing our ability to properly staff locations during our peak hours of operations by attracting and retaining “moonlighters” (part-time U-Haul employees with full-time jobs elsewhere) during our peak hours of operation.

Our self-moving related products and services, such as boxes, pads and insurance, help our customers have a better moving experience and help them to protect their belongings from potential damage during the moving process. We are committed to providing a complete line of products selected with the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customer in mind.

Our self-storage business operations consist of the rental of self-storage rooms, portable storage boxes, sales of self-storage related products, the facilitation of sales of services, and the management of self-storage facilities owned by others.

U-Haul is one of the largest North American operators of self-storage and has been a leader in the self-storage industry since 1974. U-Haul operates over 423,000 storage rooms, comprising 37.8 million square feet of storage space with locations in 49 states and 10 Canadian provinces. U-Haul’s owned and managed self-storage facility locations range in size up to 184,600 square feet of storage space, with individual storage units in sizes ranging from 6 square feet to over 1,000 square feet.

The primary market for storage rooms is the storage of household goods. We believe that our self-storage services provide a competitive advantage through such things as Max Security, an electronic system that monitors the storage facility 24 hours a day, climate control, individually alarmed rooms, extended hours access, and an internet-based customer reservation and account management system.

eMove is an online marketplace that connects consumers to independent Moving Help™ service providers and thousands of independent Self-Storage Affiliates. Our network of customer-rated affiliates provides pack and load help, cleaning help, self-storage and similar services all over North America. Our goal is to further utilize our web-based technology platform to increase service to consumers and businesses in the moving and storage market.

Our Moving and Storage operating segment business is seasonal and our results of operations and cash flows fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Historically, revenues have been stronger in the first and second fiscal quarters due to the overall increase in moving activity during the spring and summer months. The fourth fiscal quarter is generally weakest, due to a greater potential for adverse weather conditions.

Property and Casualty Insurance Operating Segment

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment provides loss adjusting and claims handling for U-Haul through regional offices across North America. Property and Casualty Insurance also underwrites components of the Safemove, Safetow, Super Safemove and Safestor protection packages to U-Haul customers. We continue to focus on increasing the penetration of these products into the moving and storage market. The business plan for Property and Casualty Insurance includes offering property and casualty products in other U-Haul related programs.

Net revenue from our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment was approximately 1.6%, 1.7% and 1.6% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Life Insurance Operating Segment

Our Life Insurance operating segment provides life and health insurance products primarily to the senior market through the direct writing and reinsuring of life insurance, Medicare supplement and annuity policies.

Net revenue from our Life Insurance operating segment was approximately 12.3%, 10.2% and 7.8% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Employees

As of March 31, 2012, we employed over 17,700 people throughout North America with approximately 98% of these employees working within our Moving and Storage operating segment and approximately 57% of these employees work on a part-time basis.

Sales and Marketing

We promote U-Haul brand awareness through direct and co-marketing arrangements. Our direct marketing activities consist of web based advertising, print and yellow pages as well as trade events, movie cameos of our rental fleet and boxes, and industry and consumer communications. Our rental equipment is our best form of advertisement. We support our independent U-Haul dealers through advertising of U-Haul moving and self-storage rentals, products and services.

Our marketing plan focuses on maintaining our leadership position in the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage industry by continually improving the ease of use and efficiency of our rental equipment, by providing added convenience to our retail centers through independent U-Haul dealers, and by expanding the capabilities of our eMove web sites.

A significant driver of U-Haul’s rental transaction volume is our utilization of an online reservation and sales system, through uhaul.com, eMove.com and our 24-hour 1-800-GO-U-HAUL telephone reservations system. These points of contact are prominently featured and are a major driver of customer lead sources.

Competition

Moving and Storage Operating Segment

The truck rental industry is highly competitive and includes a number of significant national, regional and local competitors. Generally speaking, we consider there to be two distinct users of rental trucks: commercial and “do-it-yourself” residential users. We primarily focus on the “do-it-yourself” residential user. Within this segment, we believe the principal competitive factors are convenience of rental locations, availability of quality rental moving equipment, breadth of essential products and services, and total cost to the user. Our major national competitors in both the In-Town and one-way moving equipment rental market are Avis Budget Group, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing. Additionally, we have numerous small local competitors throughout North America who compete with us in the In-Town market.

The self-storage market is large and very fragmented. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of storage rental locations, cleanliness, security and price. Our largest competitors in the self-storage market are Public Storage Inc., Extra Space Storage, Inc., and Sovran Self-Storage Inc.

Insurance Operating Segments

The insurance industry is highly competitive. In addition, the marketplace includes financial services firms offering both insurance and financial products. Some of the insurance companies are owned by stockholders and others are owned by policyholders. Many competitors have been in business for a longer period of time or possess substantially greater financial resources and broader product portfolios than our insurance companies. We compete in the insurance business based upon price, product design, and services rendered to agents and policyholders.

Recent Developments

Related Party

In April 2012, the Company received $52.2 million from SAC Holding Corporation as full repayment of principal and accrued interest for one of its junior notes. Also in April 2012 and May 2012, the Company received $46.0 million and $20.4 million, respectively from SAC Holding II Corporation as partial repayment on its junior note.

Financial Strength Ratings

In February 2012, A.M. Best downgraded the financial strength rating to B (Fair) for Repwest, and has been placed under review with negative implications. The business lines that Repwest currently operates in are generally not ratings sensitive; therefore, we do not believe the downgrade will significantly impact Repwest’s current marketing plans or its financial condition. The downgrade could negatively effect certain expansion opportunities in the future or result in additional costs.

In April 2012, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating of B++ (Good) for Oxford and upgraded its outlook from stable to positive.

Financial Data of Segment and Geographic Areas

For financial data of our segments and geographic areas please see Note 23 Financial Information by Geographic Area and Note 23A Consolidating Financial Information by Industry Segment to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), contains “forward-looking statements” regarding future events and our future results of operations. We may make additional written or oral forward-looking statements from time to time in filings with the SEC or otherwise. We believe such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, earnings or loss, estimates of capital expenditures, plans for future operations, products or services, financing needs and plans, our perceptions of our legal positions and anticipated outcomes of government investigations and pending litigation against us, liquidity, goals and strategies, plans for new business, storage occupancy, growth rate assumptions, pricing, costs, and access to capital and leasing markets as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Factors that could significantly affect results include, without limitation, the risk factors enumerated at the end of this section, as well as the following: our ability to operate pursuant to the terms of its credit facilities; our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations; the costs and availability of financing; our ability to execute our business plan; our ability to attract, motivate and retain key employees; general economic conditions; fluctuations in our costs to maintain and update our fleet and facilities; our ability to refinance our debt; changes in government regulations, particularly environmental regulations; our credit ratings; the availability of credit; changes in demand for our products; changes in the general domestic economy; the degree and nature of our competition; the resolution of pending litigation against us; changes in accounting standards and other factors described in this Annual Report or the other documents we file with the SEC. The above factors, the following disclosures, as well as other statements in this Annual Report and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, could contribute to or cause such risks or uncertainties, or could cause our stock price to fluctuate dramatically. Consequently, the forward-looking statements should not be regarded as representations or warranties by us that such matters will be realized. We assume no obligation to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, unforeseen events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following discussion of risk factors should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. These risk factors may be important in understanding this Annual Report or elsewhere.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

The truck rental industry is highly competitive and includes a number of significant national, regional and local competitors. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of rental locations, availability of quality rental moving equipment, breadth of essential services and products and total cost. Financial results for the Company can be adversely impacted by aggressive pricing from our competitors. Some of our competitors may have greater financial resources than we have. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain existing rental prices or implement price increases. Moreover, if our competitors reduce prices and we are not able or willing to do so as well, we may lose rental volume, which would likely have a materially adverse affect on our results of operations.

The self-storage industry is large and highly fragmented. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of storage rental locations, cleanliness, security and price. Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects the occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of our facilities. Competition might cause us to experience a decrease in occupancy levels, limit our ability to raise rental rates or require us to offer discounted rates that would have a material affect on results of operations and financial condition. Entry into the self-storage business may be accomplished through the acquisition of existing facilities by persons or institutions with the required initial capital. Development of new self-storage facilities is more difficult however, due to land use, zoning, environmental and other regulatory requirements. The self-storage industry has in the past experienced overbuilding in response to perceived increases in demand. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully compete in existing markets or expand into new markets.

We are highly leveraged.

As of March 31, 2012, we had total debt outstanding of $1,486.2 million and total undiscounted lease commitments of $325.4 million. Although we believe, based on existing information, that additional leverage can be supported by our operations and revenues, our existing debt could impact us in the following ways among other considerations:

·	require us to allocate a considerable portion of cash flows from operations to debt service payments;

·	limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

·	limit our ability to obtain additional financing; and

·	place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.

Our ability to make payments on our debt depends upon our ability to maintain and improve our operating performance and generate cash flow. To some extent, this is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt and meet our other cash needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. If we must sell our assets, it may negatively affect our ability to generate revenue. In addition, we may incur additional debt that would exacerbate the risks associated with our indebtedness.

Economic conditions, including those related to the credit markets, may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.

The United States economy has undergone a period of slowdown and unprecedented volatility, which resulted in a recession. It is difficult to gauge the pace of the economic recovery or if such recovery may stall or reverse course in the future. Consumer and commercial spending is generally affected by the health of the economy, which places some of the factors affecting the success of our business beyond our control. Our industries, although not as traditionally cyclical as some, could experience significant downturns in connection with or in anticipation of, declines, or sustained lack of recovery, in general economic conditions. In times of declining consumer spending we may be driven, along with our competitors, to reduce pricing which would have a negative impact on gross profit. We cannot predict if another downturn, or sustained lack of recovery, in the economy may occur which could result in reduced revenues and working capital.

Should credit markets in the United States tighten or if interest rates increase significantly we may not be able to refinance existing debt or find additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. If one or more of the financial institutions that support our existing credit facilities fails, we may not be able to find a replacement, which would negatively impact our ability to borrow under credit facilities. While we believe that we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet our anticipated requirement for working capital, debt servicing and capital expenditures through fiscal 2013, if our operating results were to worsen significantly and our cash flows or capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our fleet rotation program can be adversely affected by financial market conditions.

To meet the needs of our customers, U-Haul maintains a large fleet of rental equipment. Our rental truck fleet rotation program is funded internally through operations and externally from debt and lease financing. Our ability to fund our routine fleet rotation program could be adversely affected if financial market conditions limit the general availability of external financing. This could lead us to operate trucks longer than initially planned and/or reducing the size of the fleet, either of which could materially and negatively affect our results of operations.

Another important aspect of our fleet rotation program is the sale of used rental equipment. The sale of used equipment provides us with funds that can be used to purchase new equipment. Conditions may arise that could lead to the decrease in resale values for our used equipment. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, which would result in losses on the sale of equipment and decreases in cash flows from the sales of equipment.

We obtain our rental trucks from a limited number of manufacturers.

Over the last ten years, we purchased the majority of our rental trucks from Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation. Our fleet can be negatively affected by issues our manufacturers may face within their own supply chain. Also, it is possible that our suppliers may face financial difficulties or organizational changes which could negatively impact their ability to accept future orders or fulfill existing orders. Although we believe that we could contract with alternative manufacturers for our rental trucks, we cannot guarantee or predict how long that would take. In addition, termination of our existing relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations for an indefinite period of time.

We may not be able to effectively hedge against interest rate changes in our variable debt.

In certain instances, the Company seeks to manage its exposure to interest rate risk through the use of hedging instruments including interest rate swap agreements and forward swaps. We enter into these arrangements with counterparties that are significant financial institutions with whom we generally have other financial arrangements. We are exposed to credit risk should these counterparties not be able to perform on their obligations. Additionally, a failure on our part to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We are required to record these financial instruments at their fair value. Changes in interest rates can significantly impact the valuation of the instruments resulting in non-cash changes to our financial position.

We are controlled by a small contingent of stockholders.

As of March 31, 2012, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of AMERCO, James P. Shoen, a director of AMERCO, and Mark V. Shoen collectively are the owners of 9,222,365 shares (approximately 47.0%) of the outstanding common stock of AMERCO. In addition, Edward J. Shoen, James P. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen, Rosmarie T. Donovan (Trustee of the Shoen Irrevocable Trusts) and Dunham Trust Company (Successor Trustee of the Irrevocable “C” Trusts) (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) are parties to a stockholder agreement dated June 30, 2006 in which the Reporting Persons agreed to vote as one as provided in this agreement (the “Stockholder Agreement”). Pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement, a collective 10,897,088 shares (approximately 55.6%) of the Company’s common stock are voted at the direction of a majority in interest of the Reporting Persons. For additional information, refer to the Schedule 13Ds filed on July 13, 2006, March 9, 2007 and on June 26, 2009 with the SEC. In addition, 1,482,344 shares (approximately 7.6%) of the outstanding common stock of AMERCO are held by our Employee Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Trust.

As a result of their stock ownership and the Stockholder Agreement, Edward J. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen and James P. Shoen are in a position to significantly influence our business affairs and policies of the Company, including the approval of significant transactions, the election of the members of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and other matters submitted to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that the interests of the Reporting Persons will not conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Furthermore, as a result of the Reporting Persons’ voting power, the Company is a “controlled company” as defined in the Nasdaq Listing Rules and, therefore, may avail itself of certain exemptions under Nasdaq rules, including exemptions from the rules that require us to have (i) a majority of independent directors on the Board; (ii) independent director oversight of executive officer compensation; and (iii) independent director oversight of director nominations. Of the above available exemptions, we currently avail ourself of the exemption from independent director oversight of executive officer compensation, other than with respect to the compensation of the President of AMERCO.

We bear certain risks related to our notes receivable from SAC Holdings.

At March 31, 2012, we held $195.4 million of notes receivable from SAC Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries (“SAC Holding Corporation”) and SAC Holding II Corporation and its subsidiaries (“SAC Holding II”) (collectively “SAC Holdings”), which consist of junior unsecured notes. SAC Holdings is highly leveraged with significant indebtedness to others. If SAC Holdings is unable to meet its obligations to its senior lenders, it could trigger a default of its obligations to us. In such an event of default, we could suffer a loss to the extent the value of the underlying collateral of SAC Holdings is inadequate to repay SAC Holdings senior lenders and our junior unsecured notes. We cannot assure you that SAC Holdings will not default on its loans to its senior lenders or that the value of SAC Holdings assets upon liquidation would be sufficient to repay us in full. Due to repayments in April 2012 and May 2012 the total notes receivable balance decreased by $113.5 million, and accrued interest decreased by $5.1 million.

Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate due to seasonality and other factors associated with our industry.

Our business is seasonal and our results of operations and cash flows fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Historically, revenues have been stronger in the first and second fiscal quarters due to the overall increase in moving activity during the spring and summer months. The fourth fiscal quarter is generally weakest, due to a greater potential for adverse weather conditions and other factors that are not necessarily seasonal. As a result, our operating results for any given quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year.

Our operations subject us to numerous environmental regulations and the possibility that environmental liability in the future could adversely affect our operations.

Compliance with environmental requirements of federal, state and local governments significantly affects our business. Among other things, these requirements regulate the discharge of materials into the air, land and water and govern the use and disposal of hazardous substances. Under environmental laws or common law principles, we can be held liable for hazardous substances that are found on real property we have owned or operated. We are aware of issues regarding hazardous substances on some of our real estate and we have put in place a remediation plan at each site where we believe such a plan is necessary. See Note 20, Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We regularly make capital and operating expenditures to stay in compliance with environmental laws. In particular, we have managed a testing and removal program since 1988 for our underground storage tanks. Despite these compliance efforts, we believe that risk of environmental liability is part of the nature of our business.

Environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and could become more stringent in the future. We cannot assure you that future compliance with these regulations, future environmental liabilities, the cost of defending environmental claims, conducting any environmental remediation or generally resolving liabilities caused by us or related third parties will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and changes in existing regulations or violations of existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Our truck and trailer rental business is subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign governmental entities. Specifically, the U.S. Department of Transportation and various state and federal agencies exercise broad powers over our motor carrier operations, safety, and the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of waste materials. In addition, our storage business is also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. The failure to adhere to these laws and regulations may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowings. Compliance with changing regulations could substantially impair real property and equipment productivity and increase our costs. In addition, the Federal government may institute some regulation that limits carbon emissions by setting a maximum amount of carbon entities can emit without penalty. This would likely affect everyone who uses fossil fuels and would disproportionately affect users in the highway transportation industries. While there are too many variables at this time to assess the impact of the various proposed federal and state regulations that could affect carbon emissions, many experts believe these proposed rules could significantly affect the way companies operate in their industries.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, and changes in laws or other labor issues could adversely affect our business and our results of operations.

The success of our business is predicated upon our workforce providing excellent customer service. Our ability to attract and retain this employee base may be inhibited due to prevailing wage rates, benefit costs and the adoption of new or revised employment and labor laws and regulations. Should this occur we may be unable to provide service in certain areas or we may experience significantly increased costs of labor that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are highly dependent upon our automated systems and the Internet for managing our business.

Our information systems are largely Internet-based, including our point-of-sale reservation system and telephone systems. While our reliance on this technology lowers our cost of providing service and expands our abilities to serve, it exposes us to various risks including natural and man-made disasters. We have put into place backup systems and alternative procedures to mitigate this risk. However, disruptions or breaches in any portion of these systems could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

A.M. Best financial strength ratings are crucial to our life insurance business.

In April 2012, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating for Oxford, Christian Fidelity Life Insurance Company, North American Insurance Company and Dallas General Life Insurance Company of B++ and upgraded the outlook to positive. Financial strength ratings are important external factors that can affect the success of Oxford’s business plans. Accordingly, if Oxford’s ratings, relative to its competitors, are not maintained or do not continue to improve, Oxford may not be able to retain and attract business as currently planned, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may incur losses due to our reinsurers’ or counterparties’ failure to perform under existing contracts or we may be unable to secure sufficient reinsurance or hedging protection in the future.

We use reinsurance and derivative contracts to mitigate our risk of loss in various circumstances; primarily at Repwest and for our Moving and Storage operating segment. These agreements do not release us from our primary obligations and therefore we remain ultimately responsible for these potential costs. We cannot provide assurance that these reinsurers or counterparties will fulfill their obligations. Their inability or unwillingness to make payments to us under the terms of the contracts may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.

At December 31, 2011, Repwest reported $1.1 million of reinsurance recoverables, net of allowances and $223.9 million of reserves and liabilities ceded to reinsurers. Of this, Repwest’s largest exposure to a single reinsurer was $62.7 million.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

We have no unresolved staff comments at March 31, 2012.

Item 2. Properties

The Company, through its legal subsidiaries, owns property, plant and equipment that are utilized in the manufacturing, repair and rental of U-Haul equipment and storage space, as well as providing office space for us. Such facilities exist throughout the United States and Canada. We also manage storage facilities owned by others. We operate 1,450 U-Haul retail centers of which 481 are managed for other owners, and operates 12 manufacturing and assembly facilities. We also operate 175 fixed-site repair facilities located throughout the United States and Canada. These facilities are used primarily for the benefit of our Moving and Storage operating segment.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Shoen

In September 2002, Paul F. Shoen filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned Paul F. Shoen vs. SAC Holding Corporation et al ., CV 02-05602, seeking damages and equitable relief on behalf of AMERCO from SAC Holdings and certain current and former members of the AMERCO Board of Directors, including Edward J. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen and James P. Shoen as Defendants. AMERCO is named as a nominal Defendant in the case. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, usurpation of corporate opportunities, wrongful interference with prospective economic advantage and unjust enrichment and seeks the unwinding of sales of self-storage properties by subsidiaries of AMERCO to SAC prior to the filing of the complaint. The complaint seeks a declaration that such transfers are void as well as unspecified damages. In October 2002, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint. Also in October 2002, Ron Belec filed a derivative action in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned Ron Belec vs. William E. Carty, et al ., CV 02-06331 and in January 2003, M.S. Management Company, Inc. filed a derivative action in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned M.S. Management Company, Inc. vs. William E. Carty, et al ., CV 03-00386. Two additional derivative suits were also filed against these parties. Each of these suits is substantially similar to the Paul F. Shoen case. The Court consolidated the five cases and thereafter dismissed these actions in May 2003, concluding that the AMERCO Board of Directors had the requisite level of independence required in order to have these claims resolved by the Board. Plaintiffs appealed this decision and, in July 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded the case to the trial court for proceedings consistent with its ruling, allowing the Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint and plead in addition to substantive claims, demand futility.

In November 2006, the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In December 2006, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss, based on various legal theories. In March 2007, the Court denied AMERCO’s motion to dismiss regarding the issue of demand futility, stating that “Plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirements of demand futility by showing a majority of the members of the AMERCO Board of Directors were interested parties in the SAC transactions.” The Court heard oral argument on the remainder of the Defendants’ motions to dismiss, including the motion (“Goldwasser Motion”) based on the fact that the subject matter of the lawsuit had been settled and dismissed in earlier litigation known as Goldwasser v. Shoen , C.V.N.-94-00810-ECR (D.Nev), Washoe County, Nevada. In addition, in September and October 2007, the Defendants filed Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative Summary Judgment, based on the fact that the stockholders of the Company had ratified the underlying transactions at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders of AMERCO. In December 2007, the Court denied this motion. This ruling does not preclude a renewed motion for summary judgment after discovery and further proceedings on these issues. On April 7, 2008, the litigation was dismissed, on the basis of the Goldwasser Motion. On May 8, 2008, the Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of such dismissal to the Nevada Supreme Court. On May 20, 2008, AMERCO filed a cross appeal relating to the denial of its Motion to Dismiss in regard to demand futility.

On May 12, 2011, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings. First, the Court ruled that the Goldwasser settlement did not release claims that arose after the agreement and, therefore, reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the Complaint on that ground. Second, the Court affirmed the district court’s determination that the in pari delicto defense is available in a derivative suit and reversed and remanded to the district court to determine if the defense applies to this matter. Third, the Court remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether demand upon the AMERCO Board was, in fact, futile. Fourth, the Court invited AMERCO to seek a ruling from the district court as to the legal effect of the AMERCO Shareholders’ 2008 ratification of the underlying AMERCO/SAC transactions.

Last, as to individual claims for relief, the Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty claims as to all defendants except Mark Shoen. The Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty: ultra vires Acts claim as to all defendants. The Court reversed the district court’s dismissal of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims against the SAC entities. The Court reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the claim for wrongful interference with prospective economic advantage as to all defendants.

On remand, on July 22, 2011, AMERCO filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based upon the Shareholder’s Ratification of the SAC transactions. In addition, on August 29, 2011, certain defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claim for Wrongful Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage. On August 31, 2011, the trial court held a status conference and entered an order setting forth the briefing schedule for the two motions. On December 23, 2011, the trial court denied AMERCO’s motion for summary judgment and certain defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court has set a discovery schedule on the limited issue of demand futility. A four day evidentiary hearing on demand futility is scheduled to begin on August 20, 2012.

Environmental

Compliance with environmental requirements of federal, state and local governments may significantly affect the operation of Real Estate’s business. Among other things, these requirements regulate the discharge of materials into the air, land and water and govern the use and disposal of hazardous substances. Real Estate is aware of issues regarding hazardous substances on some of its properties. Real Estate regularly makes capital and operating expenditures to stay in compliance with environmental laws and has put in place a remedial plan at each site where it believes such a plan is necessary. Since 1988, Real Estate has managed a testing and removal program for underground storage tanks.

Based upon the information currently available to Real Estate, compliance with the environmental laws and its share of the costs of investigation and cleanup of known hazardous waste sites are not expected to result in a material adverse effect on AMERCO’s financial position or results of operations.

Other

The Company is named as a defendant in various other litigation and claims arising out of the normal course of business. In management’s opinion, none of these other matters will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As of June 1, 2012, there were approximately 3,500 holders of record of our common stock. We derived the number of our stockholders using internal stock ledgers and utilizing Mellon Investor Services Stockholder listings. AMERCO’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “UHAL”.

The following table sets forth the high and the low sales price of the common stock of AMERCO for the periods indicated:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012				2011
	High		Low		High		Low
First quarter	$	103.36	$	83.90	$	64.42	$	43.43
Second quarter	$	97.25	$	60.18	$	83.83	$	53.04
Third quarter	$	90.45	$	60.44	$	109.11	$	76.02
Fourth quarter	$	126.14	$	89.34	$	104.00	$	86.29

Dividends

AMERCO does not have a formal dividend policy. The Board periodically considers the advisability of declaring and paying dividends to common stockholders in light of existing circumstances.

On December 7, 2011, the Company declared a special cash dividend on its Common Stock of $1.00 per share to holders of record on December 23, 2011. The dividend was paid on January 3, 2012.

See Note 22, Statutory Financial Information of Insurance Subsidiaries of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain statutory restrictions on the ability of the insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to AMERCO.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock for the period March 31, 2007 through March 31, 2012 with the cumulative total return on the Dow Jones US Total Market and the Dow Jones US Transportation Average. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on March 31, 2007 in the Company’s common stock and in each of the comparison indices. The graph reflects the value of the investment based on the closing price of the common stock trading on NASDAQ on March 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Fiscal year ended March 31:	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		2012

AMERCO	$	100	$	82	$	48	$	78	$	139	$	152
Dow Jones US Total Market		100		95		59		90		105		113
Dow Jones US Transportation Average		100		101		58		96		118		119

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On December 3, 2008, the Board authorized us, using management’s discretion, to buy back shares from former employees who were participants in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). To be eligible for consideration, the employee’s ESOP account balance(s) must be valued at more than $1,000 at the then-prevailing market prices but have less than 100 shares. No such shares have been purchased.

On June 1, 2011, we redeemed all 6,100,000 shares of our issued and outstanding Series A 8½% Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) at a redemption price of $25 per share plus accrued dividends through that date. Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260 - Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for earnings per share purposes, we recognized the deficit of the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred over the consideration paid to redeem the shares.

The Series A Preferred was recorded in our Additional Paid-In Capital account, net of original issue costs at $146.3 million prior to the redemption. We paid $152.5 million to redeem the shares on June 1, 2011 of which $7.7 million was paid to our insurance subsidiaries in exchange for their holdings. The difference between what was paid to redeem the shares less their carrying amount on our balance sheet, reduced by our insurance subsidiaries holdings was $5.9 million. This amount was recognized as a reduction to our earnings available to our common shareholders for the purposes of computing earnings per share for fiscal 2012.

From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, our insurance subsidiaries purchased 308,300 shares of Series A Preferred on the open market for $7.2 million. Pursuant to ASC 260 for earnings per share purposes, we recognize the excess or deficit of the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred over the fair value of the consideration paid. For fiscal 2011, this resulted in a $0.2 million charge to net earnings as the amount paid by the insurance companies exceeded the carrying value, net of a prorated portion of original issue costs of the preferred stock. For fiscal 2010, we recognized a $0.4 million gain as the amount paid was less than our adjusted carrying value.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the MD&A, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in this Annual Report.

Listed below is selected financial data for AMERCO and consolidated subsidiaries for each of the last five years ended March 31:

	Years Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2010			2009				2008 (a), (b)
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Summary of Operations:
Self-moving equipment rentals	$	1,678,256		$	1,547,015		$	1,419,726		$	1,423,022		$	1,451,292
Self-storage revenues		134,376			120,698			110,369			110,548			122,248
Self-moving and self-storage products and service sales		213,854			205,570			198,785			199,394			217,798
Property management fees		23,266			22,132			21,632			23,192			22,820
Life insurance premiums		277,562			206,992			134,345			109,572			111,996
Property and casualty insurance premiums		32,631			30,704			27,625			28,337			28,388
Net investment and interest income		64,200			52,661			49,989			58,021			62,110
Other revenue		78,530			55,503			39,534			40,180			32,522
Total revenues		2,502,675			2,241,275			2,002,005			1,992,266			2,049,174

Operating expenses		1,093,190			1,026,577			1,022,061			1,057,880			1,089,543
Commission expenses		212,190			190,981			169,104			171,303			167,945
Cost of sales		116,542			106,024			104,049			114,387			120,210
Benefits and losses		310,839			190,429			121,105			97,617			98,760
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		13,791			9,494			7,569			12,394			13,181
Lease expense		131,215			150,809			156,951			152,424			133,931
Depreciation, net of (gains) losses on disposals (d)		208,901			189,266			227,629			265,213			221,882
Total costs and expenses		2,086,668			1,863,580			1,808,468			1,871,218			1,845,452

Earnings from operations		416,007			377,695			193,537			121,048			203,722
Interest expense		(90,371	)		(88,381	)		(93,347	)		(98,470	)		(101,420	)
Pretax earnings		325,636			289,314			100,190			22,578			102,302
Income tax expense		(120,269	)		(105,739	)		(34,567	)		(9,168	)		(34,518	)
Net earnings		205,367			183,575			65,623			13,410			67,784
Less: Excess of redemption value over carrying value of preferred shares redeemed		(5,908	)		(178	)		388			-			-
Less: Preferred stock dividends (c)		(2,913	)		(12,412	)		(12,856	)		(12,963	)		(12,963	)
Earnings available to common shareholders	$	196,546		$	170,985		$	53,155		$	447		$	54,821
Basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	10.09		$	8.80		$	2.74		$	0.02		$	2.78
Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted		19,476,187			19,432,781			19,386,791			19,350,041			19,740,571
Cash dividends declared and accrued Preferred stock (c)	$	2,913		$	12,412		$	12,856		$	12,963		$	12,963

Balance Sheet Data:
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	2,372,365		$	2,094,573		$	1,948,388		$	2,013,928		$	2,011,176
Total assets		4,654,051			4,176,154			3,762,454			3,825,073			3,832,487
Notes, loans and leases payable		1,486,211			1,397,842			1,347,635			1,546,490			1,504,677
Stockholders' equity		1,035,820			993,020			812,911			717,629			758,431

(a) Fiscal 2008 summary of operations includes 7 months of activity for SAC Holding II which was deconsolidated effective October 31, 2007.
(b) Fiscal 2008 balance sheet data does not include SAC Holding II which was deconsolidated effective October 31, 2007.
(c) Fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 reflect eliminations of $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectivley paid to affiliates.
(d) (Gains) losses were ($20.9) million, ($23.1) million, ($2.0) million, $16.6 million and ($5.9) million for fiscal 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

We begin this MD&A with the overall strategy of AMERCO, followed by a description of and strategy related to, our operating segments to give the reader an overview of the goals of our businesses and the direction in which our businesses and products are moving. We then discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. Next, we discuss our results of operations for fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011, and for fiscal 2011 compared with fiscal 2010 which are followed by an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows, and a discussion of our financial commitments in the sections entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources and Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. We conclude this MD&A by discussing our outlook for fiscal 2013.

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report, including Item 1: Business, Item 6: Selected Financial Data and Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The various sections of this MD&A contain a number of forward-looking statements, as discussed under the caption, Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this Annual Report and particularly under the section Item 1A: Risk Factors. Our actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

AMERCO has a fiscal year that ends on the 31 st of March for each year that is referenced. Our insurance company subsidiaries have fiscal years that end on the 31 st of December for each year that is referenced. They have been consolidated on that basis. Our insurance companies’ financial reporting processes conform to calendar year reporting as required by state insurance departments. Management believes that consolidating their calendar year into our fiscal year financial statements does not materially affect the presentation of financial position or results of operations. We disclose all material events, if any, occurring during the intervening period. Consequently, all references to our insurance subsidiaries’ years 2011, 2010 and 2009 correspond to fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 for AMERCO.

Overall Strategy

Our overall strategy is to maintain our leadership position in the North American “do-it-yourself” moving and storage industry. We accomplish this by providing a seamless and integrated supply chain to the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage market. As part of executing this strategy, we leverage the brand recognition of U-Haul with our full line of moving and self-storage related products and services and the convenience of our broad geographic presence.

Our primary focus is to provide our customers with a wide selection of moving rental equipment, convenient self-storage rental facilities and related moving and self-storage products and services. We are able to expand our distribution and improve customer service by increasing the amount of moving equipment and storage rooms and portable storage boxes available for rent, expanding the number of independent dealers in our network and expanding and taking advantage of our eMove capabilities.

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment is focused on providing and administering property and casualty insurance to U-Haul and its customers, its independent dealers and affiliates.

Our Life Insurance operating segment is focused on long-term capital growth through direct writing and reinsuring of life, Medicare supplement and annuity products in the senior marketplace.

Description of Operating Segments

AMERCO’s three reportable segments are:

·	Moving and Storage, comprised of AMERCO, U-Haul, and Real Estate and the subsidiaries of U-Haul and Real Estate,

·	Property and Casualty Insurance, comprised of Repwest and its subsidiaries and ARCOA,

·	Life Insurance, comprised of Oxford and its subsidiaries.

See Note 1, Basis of Presentation, Note 23, Financial Information by Geographic Area and Note 23A, Consolidating Financial Information by Industry Segment of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

Moving and Storage Operating Segment

With respect to our truck, trailer, specialty rental items and self-storage rental business, we are focused on expanding our dealer network, which provides added convenience for our customers and expanding the selection and availability of rental equipment to satisfy the needs of our customers.

U-Haul brand self-moving related products and services, such as boxes, pads and tape allow our customers to, among other things; protect their belongings from potential damage during the moving process. We are committed to providing a complete line of products selected with the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customer in mind.

eMove is an online marketplace that connects consumers to independent Moving Help ® service providers and thousands of independent Self-Storage Affiliates. Our network of customer rated affiliates and service providers furnish pack and load help, cleaning help, self-storage and similar services, all over North America. Our goal is to further utilize our web-based technology platform to increase service to consumers and businesses in the moving and storage market.

Property and Casualty Insurance Operating Segment

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment provides loss adjusting and claims handling for U-Haul through regional offices across North America. Property and Casualty Insurance also underwrites components of the Safemove, Safetow, Super Safemove and Safestor protection packages to U-Haul customers. We continue to focus on increasing the penetration of these products into the moving and storage market. The business plan for our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment includes offering property and casualty products in other U-Haul related programs.

Life Insurance Operating Segment

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies can have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Note 3, Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report summarizes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Certain accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments and assumptions, often as a result of the need to estimate matters that are inherently uncertain.

In the following pages we have set forth, with a detailed description, the accounting policies that we deem most critical to us and that require management’s most difficult and subjective judgments. These estimates are based on historical experience, observance of trends in particular areas, information and valuations available from outside sources and on various other assumptions that are believed to be

reasonable under the circumstances and which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions; such differences may be material.

We also have other policies that we consider key accounting policies, such as revenue recognition; however, these policies do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective. The accounting policies that we deem most critical to us, and involve the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments include the following:

Principles of Consolidation

We apply ASC 810 - Consolidation (“ASC 810”) in our principles of consolidation. ASC 810 addresses arrangements where a company does not hold a majority of the voting or similar interests of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). A company is required to consolidate a VIE if it has determined it is the primary beneficiary. ASC 810 also addresses the policy when a company owns a majority of the voting or similar rights and exercises effective control.

As promulgated by ASC 810, a VIE is not self-supportive due to having one or both of the following conditions: (i) it has an insufficient amount of equity for it to finance its activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support or (ii) its owners do not hold the typical risks and rights of equity owners. This determination is made upon the creation of a variable interest and is re-assessed on an on-going basis should certain changes in the operations of a VIE, or its relationship with the primary beneficiary trigger a reconsideration under the provisions of ASC 810. After a triggering event occurs the most recent facts and circumstances are utilized in determining whether or not a company is a VIE, which other company(s) have a variable interest in the entity, and whether or not the company’s interest is such that it is the primary beneficiary.

In fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, SAC Holdings were considered special purpose entities and were consolidated based on the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 90-15, Impact of Nonsubstantive Lessors, Residual Value Guarantees and Other Provisions in Leasing Transactions . In fiscal 2004, we evaluated our interests in SAC Holdings and we concluded that SAC Holdings were VIE’s and that we were the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, we continued to include SAC Holdings in our consolidated financial statements.

Triggering events in February and March of 2004 for SAC Holding Corporation required AMERCO to reassess its involvement in specific SAC Holding Corporation entities. During these reassessments it was concluded that AMERCO was no longer the primary beneficiary, resulting in the deconsolidation of SAC Holding Corporation in fiscal 2004.

In November 2007, Blackwater contributed additional capital to its wholly-owned subsidiary, SAC Holding II. This contribution was determined by us to be material with respect to the capitalization of SAC Holding II; therefore, triggering a requirement under FASB Interpretation 46(R) for us to reassess our involvement with those entities. This required reassessment led to the conclusion that SAC Holding II had the ability to fund its own operations and execute its business plan without any future subordinated financial support; therefore, we were no longer the primary beneficiary of SAC Holding II as of the date of Blackwater’s contribution.

Accordingly, at the date AMERCO ceased to be considered the primary beneficiary of SAC Holding II and its current subsidiaries, it deconsolidated these entities. The deconsolidation was accounted for as a distribution of SAC Holding II’s interests to the sole shareholder of the SAC entities. Because of AMERCO’s continuing involvement with SAC Holding II and its subsidiaries, the distribution does not qualify as discontinued operations.

It is possible that SAC Holdings could take actions that would require us to re-determine whether SAC Holdings remains a VIE and we continually monitor whether we have become the primary beneficiary of SAC Holdings. None of the events delineated in ASC 810-10-35-4 which would require a redetermination occurred during the period being reported upon in this Annual Report. Should we determine in the future that we are the primary beneficiary of SAC Holdings, we could be required to consolidate some or all of SAC Holdings within our financial statements.

The consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts of AMERCO and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 statements of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows include AMERCO and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Recoverability of Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Interest expense incurred during the initial construction of buildings and rental equipment is considered part of cost. Depreciation is computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line or an accelerated method based on a declining balance formula over the following estimated useful lives: rental equipment 2-20 years and buildings and non-rental equipment 3-55 years. We follow the deferral method of accounting based on ASC 908 - Airlines for major overhauls in which engine overhauls are capitalized and amortized over five years and transmission overhauls are capitalized and amortized over three years. Routine maintenance costs are charged to operating expense as they are incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions of property, plant and equipment are netted against depreciation expense when realized. Equipment depreciation is recognized in amounts expected to result in the recovery of estimated residual values upon disposal, i.e., minimize gains or losses. In determining the depreciation rate, historical disposal experience, holding periods and trends in the market for vehicles are reviewed.

We regularly perform reviews to determine whether facts and circumstances exist which indicate that the carrying amount of assets, including estimates of residual value, may not be recoverable or that the useful life of assets are shorter or longer than originally estimated. Reductions in residual values (i.e., the price at which we ultimately expect to dispose of revenue earning equipment) or useful lives will result in an increase in depreciation expense over the life of the equipment. Reviews are performed based on vehicle class, generally subcategories of trucks and trailers. We assess the recoverability of our assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. We consider factors such as current and expected future market price trends on used vehicles and the expected life of vehicles included in the fleet. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. In fiscal 2010, the Company reduced the carrying value of certain older trucks by $9.1 million or $0.47 per share before taxes, in which the tax effect was $0.17 per share. If asset residual values are determined to be recoverable, but the useful lives are shorter or longer than originally estimated, the net book value of the assets is depreciated over the newly determined remaining useful lives.

In fiscal 2006, management performed an analysis of the expected economic value of new rental trucks and determined that additions to the fleet resulting from purchase should be depreciated on an accelerated method based upon a declining formula. The salvage value and useful life assumptions of the rental truck fleet remain unchanged. Under the declining balances method (2.4 times declining balance), the book value of a rental truck is reduced approximately 16%, 13%, 11%, 9%, 8%, 7%, and 6% during years one through seven, respectively and then reduced on a straight line basis an additional 10% by the end of year fifteen. Whereas, a standard straight line approach would reduce the book value by approximately 5.3% per year over the life of the truck. For the affected equipment, the accelerated depreciation was $54.6 million, $44.8 million and $49.1 million greater than what it would have been if calculated under a straight line approach for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Although we intend to sell our used vehicles for prices approximating book value, the extent to which we realize a gain or loss on the sale of used vehicles is dependent upon various factors including but not limited to, the general state of the used vehicle market, the age and condition of the vehicle at the time of its disposal and the depreciation rates with respect to the vehicle . We typically sell our used vehicles at our sales centers throughout North America, on our web site at uhaul.com/trucksales or by phone at 1-866-404-0355. Additionally, we sell a large portion of our pickup and cargo van fleet at automobile dealer auctions.

Insurance Reserves

Liabilities for life insurance and certain annuity and health policies are established to meet the estimated future obligations of policies in force, and are based on mortality, morbidity and withdrawal assumptions from recognized actuarial tables which contain margins for adverse deviation. In addition, liabilities for health, disability and other policies include estimates of payments to be made on insurance claims for reported losses and estimates of losses incurred, but not yet reported. Liabilities for annuity contracts consist of contract account balances that accrue to the benefit of the policyholders.

Insurance reserves for our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment and U-Haul take into account losses incurred based upon actuarial estimates and are management’s best approximation of future payments. These estimates are based upon past claims experience and current claim trends as well as social and economic conditions such as changes in legal theories and inflation. These reserves consist of case reserves for reported losses and a provision for losses incurred but not reported (“IBNR”), both reduced by applicable reinsurance recoverables, resulting in a net liability

Due to the nature of the underlying risks and high degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the liability for future policy benefits and claims, the amounts to be ultimately paid to settle these liabilities cannot be precisely determined and may vary significantly from the estimated liability, especially for long-tailed casualty lines of business such as excess workers’ compensation. As a result of the long-tailed nature of the excess workers’ compensation policies written by Repwest during 1983 through 2002, and similar policies assumed by Repwest during 2001 through 2003, it may take a number of years for claims to be fully reported and finally settled.

On a regular basis insurance reserve adequacy is reviewed by management to determine if existing assumptions need to be updated. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, Repwest conducted a more in-depth review of its excess workers’ compensation claims as new information regarding recent loss trends emerged. This review also included a review of reinsured claims handled by a third party administrator related to the same line of business. Based upon these reviews Repwest strengthened its reserves for its excess workers’ compensation business by $48.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. After the estimated tax effect of $16.9 million this reduced earnings per share for fiscal 2012 by $1.61 per share. While management is continually monitoring the status of expected losses through a rolling review of the claim inventory and regularly reviews the adequacy of the established liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense, there can be no assurance that our loss reserves will not develop adversely and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. As a result of our review during the third quarter of fiscal 2012, it was determined that there was a need to strengthen loan loss reserves, reflecting adverse development in prior accident years in lines of business with long reporting tails. The excess workers’ compensation line comprises a majority of the total charge. These adjustments represent management’s current best estimate of the ultimate losses of the underlying claims and were recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 based upon the timing of when the information developed.

In determining the assumptions for calculating workers’ compensation reserves, management considers multiple factors including the following:

·	Claimant longevity

·	Cost trends associated with claimant treatments

·	Changes in ceding entity and third party administrator reporting practices

·	Changes in environmental factors including legal and regulatory

·	Current conditions affecting claim settlements

·	Future economic conditions including inflation

Significant variables that led to the third quarter reserve strengthening were cost trends associated with claimant treatments, changes related to ceding entity and third party administrator reporting practices, projected longevity of claimants terms and assumptions for future claim settlements.

As part of this latest review, the Company has reserved each claim based upon the accumulation of current claim costs projected through the claimants’ life expectancy, and then adjusted for applicable reinsurance arrangements. Management reviews each claim bi-annually to determine if the estimated life-time claim costs have increased and then adjusts the reserve estimate accordingly at that time. We have factored in an estimate of what the potential cost increases could be in our IBNR liability. We have not assumed settlement of the existing claims in calculating the reserve amount, unless it is in the final stages of completion.

Continued increases in claim costs, including medical inflation and new treatments and medications could lead to future adverse development resulting in additional reserve strengthening. Conversely, settlement of existing claims or if injured workers return to work or expire prematurely, could lead to future positive development.

Impairment of Investments

Investments are evaluated pursuant to guidance contained in ASC 320 - Investments - Debt and Equity Securities to determine if and when a decline in market value below amortized cost is other-than-temporary. Management makes certain assumptions or judgments in its assessment including but not limited to: ability and intent to hold the security, quoted market prices, dealer quotes or discounted cash flows, industry factors, financial factors, and issuer specific information such as credit strength. Other-than-temporary impairment in value is recognized in the current period operating results. We recognized other-than-temporary impairments of $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $2.2 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Income Taxes

Our tax returns are periodically reviewed by various taxing authorities. The final outcome of these audits may cause changes that could materially impact our financial results.

AMERCO files a consolidated tax return with all of its legal subsidiaries.

Fair Values

Fair values of cash equivalents approximate carrying value due to the short period of time to maturity. Fair values of short term investments, investments available-for-sale, long term investments, mortgage loans and notes on real estate, and interest rate swap contracts are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes or discounted cash flows. Fair values of trade receivables approximate their recorded value.

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments, trade receivables, reinsurance recoverables and notes receivable. Limited credit risk exists on trade receivables due to the diversity of our customer base and their dispersion across broad geographic markets. We place our temporary cash investments with financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution.

We have mortgage receivables, which potentially expose us to credit risk. The portfolio of notes is principally collateralized by self-storage facilities and commercial properties. We have not experienced any material losses related to the notes from individual or groups of notes in any particular industry or geographic area. The estimated fair values were determined using the discounted cash flow method and using interest rates currently offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings.

The carrying amount of long term debt and short term borrowings are estimated to approximate fair value as the actual interest rate is consistent with the rate estimated to be currently available for debt of similar term and remaining maturity.

Other investments including short term investments are substantially current or bear reasonable interest rates. As a result, the carrying values of these financial instruments approximate fair value.

Subsequent Events

Our management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after March 31, 2012, the date of our most recent balance sheet date, through the date our financial statements were issued. We do not believe any other subsequent events have occurred that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our financial statements other than those stated below.

Related Party

Financial Strength Ratings

In April 2012, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating of B++ (Good) for Oxford and upgraded its outlook from stable to positive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944) which amended FASB ASC 944-30 to provide further guidance regarding the capitalization of costs relating to the acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts. Specifically, only qualifying costs associated with successful contract acquisitions are permitted to be deferred. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (and for interim periods within such years), with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of the entity's annual reporting period. The amended guidance should be applied prospectively, but retrospective application for all prior periods is allowed. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS ”) (“ASU 2011-04”). This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with early adoption prohibited. The new guidance will require prospective application. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (“ASU 2011-12”), which defers the requirement within ASU 2011-05 to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. During the deferral, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect prior to the issuance of ASU 2011-05. The standards will be effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of the standards did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or the SEC that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, these ASU’s entail technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance related to specialized industries or entities and therefore will have minimal, if any, impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011

Listed below, on a consolidated basis, are revenues for our major product lines for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Self-moving equipment rentals	$	1,678,256	$	1,547,015
Self-storage revenues		134,376		120,698
Self-moving and self-storage products and service sales		213,854		205,570
Property management fees		23,266		22,132
Life insurance premiums		277,562		206,992
Property and casualty insurance premiums		32,631		30,704
Net investment and interest income		64,200		52,661
Other revenue		78,530		55,503
Consolidated revenue	$	2,502,675	$	2,241,275

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $131.2 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. The largest contributor to the revenue improvement was the increase in both In-Town and one-way moving transactions across both our truck and trailer fleets. We believe the growth in the number of transactions was influenced by our continuing customer service enhancements which allowed us to better serve the existing customer base combined with an increase in overall demand for our services. We were also better able to serve our customers through an increase in the amount of equipment in our fleet throughout the year. On average the number of rental trucks in the fleet grew approximately 4% compared to fiscal 2011. Other factors that contributed to the revenue improvement included an increase in our average revenue per transaction and utilization of the fleet. Factors which contribute to changes in revenue per transaction include the mix of equipment type rented and rental rates charged.

Self-storage revenues increased $13.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 due primarily to an increase in the number of rooms rented combined with a modest improvement in overall rates per occupied square foot. The average amount of occupied square feet increased by approximately 10% for fiscal 2012 compared to the same period last year. A portion of this improvement comes from the additional capacity added to the portfolio; total net rentable square feet increased by 1.4 million over the last twelve months.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $8.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Increases were recognized in the sale of propane and towing accessories/installation with the majority of the improvement coming from the sales of moving supplies.

Life insurance premiums increased $70.6 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily from entering into a new reinsurance agreement for a block of life insurance policies combined with increased Medicare supplement premiums from last year’s acquisition.

Property and casualty insurance premiums increased $1.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 due to increases in Safestor and Safemove which resulted from the increase in equipment rental transactions and self storage rentals.

Net investment and interest income increased $11.5 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily due to an increased asset base at the Life Insurance segment combined with improved yields across all three segments due to the investment of excess cash balances.

Other revenue increased $23.0 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily due to the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box TM program.

As a result of the items mentioned above, revenues for AMERCO and its consolidated subsidiaries were $2,502.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $2,241.3 million for fiscal 2011.

Listed below are revenues and earnings (loss) from operations at each of our operating segments for fiscal 2012 and 2011. The insurance companies’ years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Moving and storage
Revenues	$	2,156,923		$	1,977,826
Earnings from operations before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		432,766			355,173
Property and casualty insurance
Revenues		42,586			38,663
Earnings (loss) from operations		(36,426	)		5,638
Life insurance
Revenues		307,922			229,911
Earnings from operations		20,149			17,435
Eliminations
Revenues		(4,756	)		(5,125	)
Earnings from operations before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(482	)		(551	)
Consolidated Results
Revenues		2,502,675			2,241,275
Earnings from operations		416,007			377,695

Total costs and expenses increased $223.1 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Life Insurance accounted for $75.3 million of the increase primarily due to entering into the new reinsurance agreement. Property and Casualty Insurance accounted for $46.0 million of the increase largely due to the reserve increases associated with their closed block of workers’ compensation policies.

Operating expenses for Moving and Storage increased $101.5 million due largely to spending on personnel, rental equipment maintenance and operating costs associated with the U-Box program. Cost of sales and commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues. Depreciation expense, before gains on the disposal of equipment, increased $17.5 million while lease expense decreased $19.6 million. Over the last several years the Company has decreased its use of leases for funding new equipment acquisitions and increased its use of term loans and securitizations, which are the primary causes of the decrease in lease expense and increase in depreciation expense.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $416.0 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $377.7 million for fiscal 2011.

Interest expense for fiscal 2012 was $90.4 million, compared with $88.4 million for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in average borrowings partially offset by a decrease in average borrowing costs.

Income tax expense was $120.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $105.7 million for fiscal 2011. The increase was due to higher pretax earnings for fiscal 2012.

Dividends paid or accrued on our Series A Preferred were $2.9 million and $12.4 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fiscal 2012 included a $5.9 million non-recurring charge related to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock. All of our Series A Preferred stock was redeemed on June 1, 2011; therefore, no dividends were accrued with respect to the Series A Preferred for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2012.

As a result of the above mentioned items, earnings available to common shareholders were $196.5 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $171.0 million for fiscal 2011.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share for fiscal 2012 were $10.09, compared with $8.80 for fiscal 2011.

The weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted were 19,476,187 for fiscal 2012, compared with 19,432,781 for fiscal 2011.

AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Fiscal 2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010

Listed below, on a consolidated basis, are revenues for our major product lines for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	(In thousands)
Self-moving equipment rentals	$	1,547,015	$	1,419,726
Self-storage revenues		120,698		110,369
Self-moving and self-storage products and service sales		205,570		198,785
Property management fees		22,132		21,632
Life insurance premiums		206,992		134,345
Property and casualty insurance premiums		30,704		27,625
Net investment and interest income		52,661		49,989
Other revenue		55,503		39,534
Consolidated revenue	$	2,241,275	$	2,002,005

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $127.3 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. The growth in revenue came from both In-Town and one-way business and has been spread across both truck and trailer rentals. The increase was due primarily to growth in transactions along with improvements in our average revenue per transaction. We believe the growth in transactions was influenced by an increase in demand for our services as well as from enhancements to our customer service capabilities.

Self-storage revenues increased $10.3 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010 due primarily to an increase in the number of rooms rented combined with a modest improvement in overall rates per occupied square foot. Our average occupancy during fiscal 2011 increased by approximately 610,000 square feet compared with fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011 we added over 820,000 of new net rentable square feet to our portfolio compared to just over 582,000 of new net rentable square feet in fiscal 2010.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $6.8 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. We experienced increased sales in each of our three major product categories including moving supplies, propane, and hitches and towing accessories.

Life insurance premiums increased $72.6 for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. Continued expansion of its single premium whole life product accounted for $22.1 million of the increase with the remaining increase of $50.5 million primarily due to two reinsurance transactions completed in the third quarter.

Property and casualty insurance premiums increased $3.1 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. A portion of Repwest’s premiums are from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. As moving transactions have increased this year so have the related property and casualty insurance premiums.

Other revenue increased $16.0 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010 primarily due to the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box TM program.

As a result of the items mentioned above, revenues for AMERCO and its consolidated subsidiaries were $2,241.3 million for fiscal 2011, compared with $2,002.0 million for fiscal 2010.

Listed below are revenues and earnings from operations at each of our operating segments for fiscal 2011 and 2010. The insurance companies’ years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Moving and storage
Revenues	$	1,977,826		$	1,816,322
Earnings from operations before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		355,173			170,507
Property and casualty insurance
Revenues		38,663			34,390
Earnings from operations		5,638			6,279
Life insurance
Revenues		229,911			155,725
Earnings from operations		17,435			16,858
Eliminations
Revenues		(5,125	)		(4,432	)
Earnings from operations before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(551	)		(107	)
Consolidated Results
Revenues		2,241,275			2,002,005
Earnings from operations		377,695			193,537

Total costs and expenses increased $55.1 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. The increase in benefit costs were primarily due to the two reinsurance transactions entered into by Oxford during fiscal 2011 as well as from additional reserves and commissions associated with their single premium whole life business. Total costs at the life insurance segment increased $73.6 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010.

Operating expenses for Moving and Storage decreased $2.5 million primarily from reduced liability costs associated with the rental equipment fleet offset by increases in personnel costs resulting from the increase in the rental business. Liability costs have improved as expected losses from prior years continue to develop positively. Depreciation expense, primarily related to the rental equipment fleet, decreased $38.4 million. Included in this decrease is a $21.1 million improvement in the gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment. Cost of sales and commission expenses are increasing in relation to the associated revenues.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $377.7 million for fiscal 2011, compared with $193.5 million for fiscal 2010.

Interest expense for fiscal 2011 was $88.4 million, compared with $93.3 million for fiscal 2010. The average amount of outstanding notes, loans and capital leases payable has decreased during fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010.

Income tax expense was $105.7 million for fiscal 2011, compared with $34.6 million for fiscal 2010 due to higher pretax earnings for fiscal 2011.

Dividends accrued on our Series A Preferred were $12.4 million and $12.9 million for fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As a result of the above mentioned items, earnings available to common shareholders were $171.0 million for fiscal 2011, compared with $53.2 million for fiscal 2010.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share for fiscal 2011 were $8.80, compared with $2.74 for fiscal 2010.

The weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted were 19,432,781 for fiscal 2011, compared with 19,386,791 for fiscal 2010.

Moving and Storage

Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011

Listed below are revenues for the major product lines at our Moving and Storage operating segment for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Self-moving equipment rentals	$	1,679,963	$	1,549,058
Self-storage revenues		134,376		120,698
Self-moving and self-storage products and service sales		213,854		205,570
Property management fees		23,266		22,132
Net investment and interest income		27,132		25,702
Other revenue		78,332		54,666
Moving and Storage revenue	$	2,156,923	$	1,977,826

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $130.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. The largest contributor to the revenue improvement was the increase in both In-Town and one-way moving transactions across both our truck and trailer fleets. We believe the growth in the number of transactions was influenced by our continuing customer service enhancements which allowed us to better serve the existing customer base combined with an increase in overall demand for our services. We were also better able to serve our customers through an increase in the amount of equipment in our fleet throughout the year. On average the number of rental trucks in the fleet grew approximately 4% compared to fiscal 2011. Other factors that contributed to the revenue improvement included an increase in our average revenue per transaction and utilization of the fleet. Factors which contribute to changes in revenue per transaction include the mix of equipment type rented and rental rates charged.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $8.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Increases were recognized in the sale of propane and towing accessories and installation with the majority of the improvement coming from the sales of moving supplies.

Other revenue increased $23.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily from the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box TM program.

The Company owns and manages self-storage facilities. Self-storage revenues reported in the consolidated financial statements represent Company-owned locations only. Self-storage data for our owned storage locations follows:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands, except occupancy rate)
Room count as of March 31		165			153
Square footage as of March 31		13,889			12,534
Average number of rooms occupied		123			113
Average occupancy rate based on room count		76.9	%		75.8	%
Average square footage occupied		10,401			9,437

Total costs and expenses increased $101.5 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Operating expenses increased $69.8 million due largely to spending on personnel, rental equipment maintenance and operating costs associated with the U-Box program. Cost of sales and commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues. Depreciation expense, before gains on the disposal of equipment, increased $17.5 million while lease expense decreased $19.6 million. Over the

last several years the Company has decreased its use of leases for funding new equipment acquisitions and increased its use of term loans and securitizations, which are the primary causes of the decrease in lease expense and increase in depreciation expense.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations for Moving and Storage before consolidation of the equity in the earnings of the insurance subsidiaries, increased to $432.8 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $355.2 million for the fiscal 2011.

Equity in the earnings of AMERCO’s insurance subsidiaries decreased $25.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 as a result of the reserve strengthening at the Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $422.4 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $370.1 million for fiscal 2011.

Moving and Storage

Fiscal 2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010

Listed below are revenues for the major product lines at our Moving and Storage operating segment for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	(In thousands)
Self-moving equipment rentals	$	1,549,058	$	1,421,331
Self-storage revenues		120,698		110,369
Self-moving and self-storage products and service sales		205,570		198,785
Property management fees		22,132		21,632
Net investment and interest income		25,702		26,055
Other revenue		54,666		38,150
Moving and Storage revenue	$	1,977,826	$	1,816,322

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $127.7 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. The growth in revenue came from both In-Town and one-way business and has been spread across both truck and trailer rentals. The increase was due primarily to growth in transactions along with improvements in our average revenue per transaction. We believe the growth in transactions was influenced by an increase in demand for our services as well as from enhancements to our customer service capabilities.

Self-storage revenues increased $10.3 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010 due primarily to an increase in the number of rooms rented combined with a modest improvement in overall rates per occupied square foot. Our average occupancy during fiscal 2011 increased by approximately 610,000 square feet compared with fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011, we added over 820,000 of new net rentable square feet to our portfolio compared to just over 582,000 of new net rentable square feet in fiscal 2010.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $6.8 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. In particular we experienced increased sales in each of our three major product categories including propane, hitches and towing accessories and moving supplies.

Other revenue increased $16.5 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010 primarily from the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box TM program.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(In thousands, except occupancy rate)
Room count as of March 31		153			144
Square footage as of March 31		12,534			11,713
Average number of rooms occupied		113			106
Average occupancy rate based on room count		75.8	%		75.2	%
Average square footage occupied		9,437			8,827

Total costs and expenses decreased $23.2 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010. Operating expenses decreased $2.5 million primarily from reduced liability costs associated with the rental equipment fleet offset by increases in personnel costs resulting from the increase in the rental business. Liability costs have improved as expected losses from prior years continue to develop positively. Depreciation expense, primarily related to the rental equipment fleet, decreased $38.4 million. Included in this decrease is a $21.1 million improvement in the gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment. Cost of sales and commission expenses are increasing in relation to the associated revenues.

Equity in the earnings of AMERCO’s insurance subsidiaries increased $0.1 million for fiscal 2011, compared with fiscal 2010.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $370.1 million for fiscal 2011, compared with $185.3 million for fiscal 2010.

Property and Casualty Insurance

2011 Compared with 2010

Net premiums were $32.6 million and $30.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A portion of Repwest’s premiums are from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. The increase corresponded with the increased moving and storage transactions at U-Haul.

Net investment income was $10.0 million and $8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was due to $1.0 million of gains on assets disposed and higher returns from assets invested in mortgage loans.

Net operating expenses were $13.3 million and $15.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The decrease was due to a $1.1 million payment related to an excess workers’ compensation treaty payment in 2010 with no similar expense in 2011 and a $1.2 million decrease in net loss adjusting expense in 2011.

Benefits and losses incurred were $65.7 million and $17.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due to reserve strengthening on terminated workers’ compensation programs originally written or reinsured between 1983 and 2003. Losses in this line of business increased $53.8 million of which $48.3 million was recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company determined that claims have been developing much more adversely than previously anticipated. A combination of issues including medical inflation, additional treatments, longer claim terms and underestimation of claims costs by third party administrators and reinsurers contributed to these adjustments. These updated assumptions led to the revision in the Company’s loss assumptions for this business.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings (loss) from operations were ($36.4) million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Property and Casualty Insurance

2010 Compared with 2009

Net premiums were $30.7 million and $27.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A portion of Repwest’s premiums are from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. As moving transactions have increased this year so have the related premiums.

Net investment income was $8.0 million and $6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a reallocation of invested assets between short and long term investment opportunities.

Net operating expenses were $15.8 million and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase was due to a $1.1 million payment related to an excess workers’ compensation treaty payment and a $1.1 million increase in underwriting expenses.

Benefits and losses incurred were $17.2 million and $14.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase was due to the increase in premiums on the “Safe” product line of business and the strengthening of reserves on terminated programs. Also contributing to the increase was a $1.0 million increase in terminated lines offset by a $1.1 million decrease in claims expenses.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings from operations were $5.6 million and $6.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Life Insurance

2011 Compared with 2010

Net premiums were $277.6 million and $207.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During 2011 we entered in a coinsurance arrangement for a block of whole life policies resulting in a one-time increase in premiums of $83.5 million due to the transfer of liabilities. Likewise, 2010 included a $30.8 million increase in premiums related to a coinsurance agreement entered into for a block of final expense whole life policies acquired. Medicare supplement premiums increased $27.1 million, of which $32.6 million was attributable to the 2010 acquisition of a block of existing policies. This was offset by policy terminations which exceeded rate increases on existing business. Other life insurance premiums and annuitizations accounted for a decrease of $9.1 million during the year.

Net investment income was $28.8 million and $20.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was due to an additional $2.9 million in gains on the sale of securities and increased income due to a larger invested asset base.

Net operating expenses were $28.9 million and $29.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. An increase in general administrative and commission expense related to current year annuity sales and last year’s Medicare supplement acquisition was offset by a reduction in life insurance commissions.

Benefits and losses incurred were $245.1 million and $173.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There was a net increase of $52.7 million in Life benefits due to the transfer of liabilities for the coinsurance of new blocks of business during both quarters ending December 31, 2011 and 2010. Medicare supplement benefits increased $24.1 million. An increase of $31.1 million was due to the acquisition of last year’s Medicare supplement block of business, which was partially offset by a reduction of $7.0 million in benefits on the existing business. All other business had a net decrease in benefits of $4.9 million for the year.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and the value of business acquired (“VOBA”) was $13.8 million and $9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Approximately $1.2 million of the increase was due to additional annuity DAC amortization resulting from realized capital gains recognized during the year. An additional $1.5 million was from the acquisition of last year’s Medicare supplement and final expense policies. The remaining increase was spread across various life insurance and annuity products.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings from operations were $20.1 million and $17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Life Insurance

2010 Compared with 2009

Net premiums were $207.0 million and $134.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of the increase, $30.8 million resulted from the coinsurance agreement entered into on September 30, 2010 to reinsure a block of final expense life insurance policies. As part of the transaction, assets were transferred to us and classified as premium upon such transfer. Medicare supplement premiums increased by $13.6 million primarily due to the acquisition of a Medicare supplement block of business and rate increases on existing policies, offset by policy lapses and terminations. Sales of the company’s single premium whole life product accounted for an increase of $22.1 million.

Net investment income was $20.7 million and $18.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The improvement was due to an increased asset base and from gains on sale of securities.

Net operating expenses were $29.8 million and $24.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The growth was a result of commissions paid on increased sales of the single premium life product plus commissions on the Medicare supplement block of business purchased in September 2010.

Benefits and losses incurred were $173.2 million and $106.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Life insurance benefits increased $59.1 million, of which $19.7 million was due to expanded sales of the single premium life product, $6.6 million from increased sales of final expense life insurance, and $30.8 million from reserves that were transferred under the new coinsurance agreement. Medicare supplement increased by a net of $8.9 million, of which $14.9 million was due to the acquisition of a Medicare supplement block of business offset by policy lapses and terminations.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs DAC and the value of business acquired VOBA was $9.5 million and $7.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings from operations were $17.4 million and $16.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe our current capital structure is a positive factor that will enable us to pursue our operational plans and goals and provide us with sufficient liquidity for the foreseeable future. The majority of our obligations currently in place mature at the end of fiscal years 2016 or 2019. However, since there are many factors which could affect our liquidity, including some which are beyond our control, there is no assurance that future cash flows and liquidity resources will be sufficient to meet our outstanding debt obligations and our other future capital needs.

At March 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents totaled $350.1 million, compared with $375.5 million on March 31, 2011. The assets of our insurance subsidiaries are generally unavailable to fulfill the obligations of non-insurance operations (AMERCO, U-Haul and Real Estate). As of March 31, 2012 (or as otherwise indicated), cash and cash equivalents, other financial assets (receivables, short-term investments, other investments, fixed maturities, and related party assets) and debt obligations of each operating segment were:

	Moving & Storage		Property and Casualty Insurance (a)		Life Insurance (a)
	(In thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	309,228	$	15,462	$	25,410
Other financial assets		424,654		452,860		779,097
Debt obligations		1,486,211		-		-

(a) As of December 31, 2011

At March 31, 2012, our Moving and Storage segment had cash available under existing credit facilities of $299.9 million as well as $19.1 million of a term loan to be used for new equipment purchases.

A summary of our consolidated cash flows for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the table below:

	Years Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	664,605		$	572,863		$	402,521
Net cash used by investing activities		(576,962	)		(380,988	)		(117,978	)
Net cash used by financing activities		(112,745	)		(60,768	)		(283,656	)
Effects of exchange rate on cash		(294	)		271			2,644
Net cash flow		(25,396	)		131,378			3,531
Cash at the beginning of the period		375,496			244,118			240,587
Cash at the end of the period	$	350,100		$	375,496		$	244,118

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $91.7 million in fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily due to improved profitability at the Moving and Storage segment. The improvement at Moving and Storage was primarily due to increased revenues. Operating cash flows from the Life Insurance operating segment increased $31.8 million primarily due to a reinsurance arrangement entered into during fiscal 2012 combined with new premiums.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $196.0 million in fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Purchases of property, plant and equipment, which are reported net of cash from leases, increased $109.4 million. Cash from new leases increased $75.4 million and cash used to purchase new equipment and invest in construction and real estate increased $154.9 million. Cash from the sales of property, plant and equipment decreased $11.5 million. Cash used for investing activities at the insurance companies increased $74.9 million primarily due to the investing of cash generated from operations, including cash from the reinsurance agreement entered into by Oxford.

Net cash used by financing activities increased $52.0 million in fiscal 2012, as compared with fiscal 2011. The redemption of our Preferred stock and the Common stock dividend paid were offset by the net change of $88 million in securitization deposits in fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011. The securitization deposit line represents net inflows or outflows of proceeds received from the initial funding of our fleet securitization loans. When the loans are initially funded for the full amount of the loan, a portion of the proceeds are set aside as a deposit until such time that we use the funds for the acquisition of equipment. In fiscal 2011 we had a net increase in these deposits of $46.0 million while in fiscal 2012 we had a net decrease in these deposits of $42.1 million. Net annuity withdrawals at the Life Insurance operating segment have decreased $7.9 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources and Requirements of Our Operating Segments

Moving and Storage

To meet the needs of our customers, U-Haul maintains a large fleet of rental equipment. Capital expenditures have primarily reflected new rental equipment acquisitions and the buyouts of existing fleet from leases. The capital to fund these expenditures has historically been obtained internally from operations and the sale of used equipment and externally from debt and lease financing. In the future, we anticipate that our internally generated funds will be used to service the existing debt and fund operations. U-Haul estimates that during fiscal 2013 the Company will reinvest in its truck and trailer rental fleet approximately $325 million, net of equipment sales and excluding any lease buyouts. For fiscal 2012, the Company invested, net of sales, approximately $338 million before any lease buyouts in its truck and trailer fleet. Fleet investments in fiscal 2013 and beyond will be dependent upon several factors including availability of capital, the truck rental environment and the used-truck sales market. We anticipate that the fiscal 2013 investments will be funded largely through debt financing, external lease financing and cash from operations. Management considers several factors including cost and tax consequences when selecting a method to fund capital expenditures. Our allocation between debt and lease financing can change from year to year based upon financial market conditions which may alter the cost or availability of financing options.

Real Estate has traditionally financed the acquisition of self-storage properties to support U-Haul's growth through debt financing and funds from operations and sales. The Company’s plan for the expansion of owned storage properties includes the acquisition of existing self-storage locations from third parties, the acquisition and development of bare land, and the acquisition and redevelopment of existing buildings not currently used for self-storage. The Company is funding these development projects through construction loans and internally generated funds. For fiscal 2012, the Company invested nearly $102 million in real estate acquisitions, new construction and renovation and repair. For fiscal 2013, the timing of new projects will be dependent upon several factors including the entitlement process, availability of capital, weather, and the identification and successful acquisition of target properties. U-Haul's growth plan in self-storage also includes the expansion of the eMove program, which does not require significant capital.

Net capital expenditures (purchases of property, plant and equipment less proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment) were $420.9 million, $300.0 million and $116.6 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company entered into new equipment leases of $120.3 million, $44.9 million and $74.9 million during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Moving and Storage operating segment continues to hold significant cash and has access to additional liquidity. Management may invest these funds in our existing operations, expand our product lines or pursue external opportunities in the self-moving and storage market place, or reduce existing indebtedness where possible.

Property and Casualty Insurance

State insurance regulations restrict the amount of dividends that can be paid to stockholders of insurance companies. As a result, Property and Casualty Insurance’s assets are generally not available to satisfy the claims of AMERCO or its legal subsidiaries.

The Company believes that stockholders equity at the Property and Casualty operating segment remains sufficient following the third quarter reserve strengthening adjustment and we do not believe that its ability to pay ordinary dividends to AMERCO or per state regulations will be restricted.

Stockholder’s equity was $123.8 million, $154.6 million, and $151.7 million at December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. The decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 resulted from net losses of $23.6 million, a dividend distributed to AMERCO of $6.8 million in property and a decrease in other comprehensive income of $0.4 million. Property and Casualty Insurance does not use debt or equity issues to increase capital and therefore has no direct exposure to capital market conditions other than through its investment portfolio.

Life Insurance

The Life Insurance operating segment manages its financial assets to meet policyholder and other obligations including investment contract withdrawals. Life Insurance’s net withdrawals for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $14.2 million. State insurance regulations restrict the amount of dividends that can be paid to stockholders of insurance companies. As a result, Life Insurance’s funds are generally not available to satisfy the claims of AMERCO or its legal subsidiaries.

Life Insurance’s stockholder’s equity was $215.8 million, $188.7 million, and $173.2 million at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in 2011 compared with 2010 resulted from earnings of $13.2 million and an increase in other comprehensive income of $13.9 million. Life Insurance does not use debt or equity issues to increase capital and therefore has no direct exposure to capital market conditions other than through its investment portfolio.

Cash Provided from Operating Activities by Operating Segments

Moving and Storage

Net cash provided by operating activities was $536.9 million, $471.0 million and $367.7 million in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in self-moving equipment rental revenues, storage revenues and product and service sales was primarily responsible for the improved operating cash flows.

Property and Casualty Insurance

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.7 million, $4.3 million, and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the collection of reinsurance receivables.

Property and Casualty Insurance’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment portfolios amounted to $44.1 million, $76.2 million, and $106.3 million at December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. This balance reflects funds in transition from maturity proceeds to long term investments. Management believes this level of liquid assets, combined with budgeted cash flow, is adequate to meet foreseeable cash needs. Capital and operating budgets allow Property and Casualty Insurance to schedule cash needs in accordance with investment and underwriting proceeds.

Life Insurance

Net cash provided by operating activities was $128.6 million, $98.1 million and $31.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. An increase of $28.3 million was due to additional cash received in the year ended December 31, 2011 from the coinsurance of a new block of life insurance business compared to the net cash received in the period ended December 31, 2010 for the assumption of a Medicare block of business and coinsurance of a block of final expense life insurance policies. Offsetting this was reduced sales of single premium life insurance policies.

In addition to cash flows from operating activities and financing activities, a substantial amount of liquid funds are available through Life Insurance’s short-term portfolio. At December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments amounted to $54.1 million, $53.6 million and $57.5 million, respectively. Management believes that the overall sources of liquidity are adequate to meet foreseeable cash needs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - Summary

We believe we have the financial resources needed to meet our business plans including our working capital needs. The Company continues to hold significant cash and has access to existing credit facilities and additional liquidity to meet our anticipated capital expenditure requirements for investment in our rental fleet, rental equipment and storage acquisitions and build outs.

Our borrowing strategy is primarily focused on asset-backed financing and rental equipment operating leases. As part of this strategy, we seek to ladder maturities and hedge floating rate loans through the use of interest rate swaps. While each of these loans typically contains provisions governing the amount that can be borrowed in relation to specific assets, the overall structure is flexible with no limits on overall Company borrowings. Management feels it has adequate liquidity between cash and cash equivalents and unused borrowing capacity in existing credit facilities to meet the current and expected needs of the Company over the next several years. At March 31, 2012, we had cash availability under existing credit facilities of $299.9 million as well as $19.1 million from a term loan to be used for new equipment purchases. It is possible that circumstances beyond our control could alter the ability of the financial institutions to lend us the unused lines of credit. We believe that there are additional opportunities for leverage in our existing capital structure. For a more detailed discussion of our long-term debt and borrowing capacity, please see Note 9, Borrowings of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets and are measured and classified based upon a three tiered approach to valuation. ASC 820 requires that financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value be classified and disclosed in a Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 category. For more information, please see Note 17, Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The available-for-sale securities held by the Company are recorded at fair value. These values are determined primarily from actively traded markets where prices are based either on direct market quotes or observed transactions. Liquidity is a factor considered during the determination of the fair value of these securities. Market price quotes may not be readily available for certain securities or the market for them has slowed or ceased. In situations where the market is determined to be illiquid, fair value is determined based upon limited available information and other factors including expected cash flows. At March 31, 2012, we had $1.2 million of available-for-sale assets classified in Level 3.

The interest rate swaps held by the Company as hedges against interest rate risk for our variable rate debt are recorded at fair value. These values are determined using pricing valuation models which include broker quotes for which significant inputs are observable. They include adjustments for counterparty credit quality and other deal-specific factors, where appropriate and are classified as Level 2.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides contractual commitments and contingencies as of March 31, 2012:

			Payment due by Period (as of March 31, 2012)
Contractual Obligations	Total		Prior to 03/31/13		04/01/13 03/31/15		04/01/15 03/31/17		April 1, 2017 and Thereafter
	(In thousands)
Notes, loans and leases payable - Principal	$	1,467,611	$	184,040	$	268,834	$	747,121	$	267,616
Notes, loans and leases payable - Interest		194,248		56,147		95,150		35,262		7,689
Revolving credit agreements - Principal		23,920		-		23,920		-		-
Revolving credit agreements - Interest		490		420		70		-		-
Operating leases		470,731		147,001		196,853		96,999		29,878
Property and casualty obligations (a)		158,463		15,186		19,834		15,316		108,127
Life, health and annuity obligations (b)		2,632,979		186,011		327,450		274,116		1,845,402
Self insurance accruals (c)		380,140		109,865		165,462		73,062		31,751
Post retirement benefit liability		9,627		503		1,258		1,679		6,187
Total contractual obligations	$	5,338,209	$	699,173	$	1,098,831	$	1,243,555	$	2,296,650

(a) These estimated obligations for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses include case reserves for reported claims and IBNR claims estimates and are net of expected reinsurance recoveries. The ultimate amount to settle both the case reserves and IBNR is an estimate based upon historical experience and current trends and such estimates could materially differ from actual results. The assumptions do not include future premiums. Due to the significant assumptions employed in this model, the amounts shown could materially differ from actual results.

( b) These estimated obligations are based on mortality, morbidity, withdrawal and lapse assumptions drawn from our historical experience and adjusted for any known trends. These obligations include expected interest crediting but no amounts for future annuity deposits or premiums for life and Medicare supplement policies. The cash flows shown are undiscounted for interest and as a result total outflows for all years shown significantly exceed the corresponding liabilities of $623.8 million included in our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012. Life Insurance expects to fully fund these obligations from their invested asset portfolio. Due to the significant assumptions employed in this model, the amounts shown could materially differ from actual results.

( c) These estimated obligations are primarily the Company’s self insurance accruals for portions of the liability coverage for our rental equipment. The estimates for future settlement are based upon historical experience and current trends. Due to the significant assumptions employed in this model, the amounts shown could materially differ from actual results.

As presented above, contractual obligations on debt and guarantees represent principal payments while contractual obligations for operating leases represent the notional payments under the lease arrangements.

ASC 740 - Income Taxes liabilities and interest of $15.8 million is not included above due to uncertainty surrounding ultimate settlements, if any.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company uses off-balance sheet arrangements in situations where management believes that the economics and sound business principles warrant their use.

AMERCO utilizes operating leases for certain rental equipment and facilities with terms expiring substantially through 2018. In the event of a shortfall in proceeds from the sales of the underlying rental equipment assets, AMERCO has guaranteed $145.3 million of residual values at March 31, 2012 for these assets at the end of their respective lease terms. AMERCO has been leasing rental equipment since 1987. To date, we have not experienced residual value shortfalls related to these leasing arrangements. Using the average cost of fleet related debt as the discount rate, the present value of AMERCO’s minimum lease payments and residual value guarantees were $391.1 million at March 31, 2012.

Historically, AMERCO has used off-balance sheet arrangements in connection with the expansion of our self-storage business. For more information please see Note 21, Related Party Transactions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These arrangements were primarily used when the Company’s overall borrowing structure was more limited. The Company does not face similar limitations currently and off-balance sheet arrangements have not been utilized in our self-storage expansion in recent years. In the future, we will continue to identify and consider off-balance sheet opportunities to the extent such arrangements would be economically advantageous to us and our stockholders.

WE currently manage the self-storage properties owned or leased by SAC Holdings, Mercury Partners, L.P. (“Mercury”), Four SAC Self-Storage Corporation (“4 SAC”), Five SAC Self-Storage Corporation (“5 SAC”), Galaxy Investments, L.P. (“Galaxy”) and Private Mini Storage Realty, L.P. (“Private Mini”) pursuant to a standard form of management agreement, under which we receive a management fee of between 4% and 10% of the gross receipts plus reimbursement for certain expenses. We received management fees, exclusive of reimbursed expenses, of $22.5 million, $22.0 million and $22.6 million from the above mentioned entities during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This management fee is consistent with the fee received for other properties we previously managed for third parties. SAC Holdings, 4 SAC, 5 SAC, Galaxy and Private Mini are substantially controlled by Blackwater Investments, Inc. (“Blackwater”). Blackwater is wholly-owned by Mark V. Shoen, a significant shareholder of AMERCO. Mercury is substantially controlled by Mark V. Shoen. James P. Shoen, a significant shareholder and director of AMERCO, has an interest in Mercury.

We lease space for marketing company offices, vehicle repair shops and hitch installation centers from subsidiaries of SAC Holdings, 5 SAC and Galaxy. Total lease payments pursuant to such leases were $2.4 million, $2.5 million and $2.5 million in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The terms of the leases are similar to the terms of leases for other properties owned by unrelated parties that are leased by us.

At March 31, 2012, subsidiaries of SAC Holdings, 4 SAC, 5 SAC, Galaxy and Private Mini acted as U-Haul independent dealers. The financial and other terms of the dealership contracts with the aforementioned companies and their subsidiaries are substantially identical to the terms of those with the Company’s other independent dealers whereby commissions are paid by us based on equipment rental revenues. We paid the above mentioned entities $41.7 million, $37.3 million and $34.7 million in commissions pursuant to such dealership contracts during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During fiscal 2012, subsidiaries of the Company held various junior unsecured notes of SAC Holdings. Substantially all of the equity interest of SAC Holdings is controlled by Blackwater. The Company does not have an equity ownership interest in SAC Holdings. We recorded interest income of $19.4 million, $19.2 million and $18.9 million and received cash interest payments of $17.8 million, $15.8 million and $13.9 million from SAC Holdings during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The largest aggregate amount of notes receivable outstanding during fiscal 2012 was $196.2 million and the aggregate notes receivable balance at March 31, 2012 was $195.4 million. In accordance with the terms of these notes, SAC Holdings may prepay the notes without penalty or premium at any time. The scheduled maturities of these notes are between 2019 and 2024. Due to the repayments in April 2012 and May 2012 the total notes receivable balance decreased by $113.5 million.

These agreements along with notes with subsidiaries of SAC Holdings, 4 SAC, 5 SAC, Galaxy and Private Mini, excluding Dealer Agreements, provided revenues of $45.3 million, expenses of $2.4 million and cash flows of $41.8 million during fiscal 2012. Revenues and commission expenses related to the Dealer Agreements were $194.1 million and $41.7 million, respectively during fiscal 2012.

In April 2012, we received $52.2 million from SAC Holding Corporation as full repayment of principal and accrued interest for one of its junior notes. Also in April 2012 and May 2012, we received $46.0 million and $20.4 million, respectively from SAC Holding II Corporation as partial repayment on its junior note.

Fiscal 2013 Outlook

We will continue to focus our attention on increasing transaction volume and improving pricing, product and utilization for self-moving equipment rentals. Maintaining an adequate level of new investment in our truck fleet is an important component of our plan to meet our operational goals. Revenue in the U-Move program could be adversely impacted should we fail to execute in any of these areas. Even if we execute our plans, we could see declines in revenues primarily due to the economic conditions or competitive pressures that are beyond our control.

We have added new storage locations and expanded at existing locations. In fiscal 2013, we are looking to continue to acquire new locations, complete current projects and increase occupancy in our existing portfolio of locations. New projects and acquisitions will be considered and pursued if they fit our long-term plans and meet our financial objectives. In the current environment we have focused fewer resources on new construction than in recent history. We will continue to invest capital and resources in the U-Box TM storage container program throughout fiscal 2013.

The Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment will continue to provide loss adjusting and claims handling for U-Haul and underwrite components of the Safemove, Safetow, Super Safemove and Safestor protection packages to U-Haul customers.

The Life Insurance operating segment is pursuing its goal of expanding its presence in the senior market through the sales of its Medicare supplement, life and annuity policies. This strategy includes growing its agency force, expanding its new product offerings, and pursuing business acquisition opportunities.

Quarterly Results (unaudited)

The quarterly results shown below are derived from unaudited financial statements for the eight quarters beginning April 1, 2010 and ending March 31, 2012. We believe that all necessary adjustments have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly, and in accordance with GAAP, such results. Moving and Storage operations are seasonal and proportionally more of the Company’s revenues and net earnings from its Moving and Storage operations are generated in the first and second quarters of each fiscal year (April through September). The operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

	Quarter Ended
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		September 30, 2011		June 30, 2011
	(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Total revenues	$	523,440	$	633,089	$	703,181	$	642,965
Earnings from operations		58,338		24,873		184,433		148,363
Net earnings		25,405		728		101,011		78,223
Earnings available to common shareholders		25,405		728		101,175		69,238
Basic and diluted earings per common share	$	1.29	$	0.04	$	5.20	$	3.56
Weighted average common shares outstanding: basic and diluted		19,492,159		19,481,614		19,470,948		19,460,126

	Quarter Ended
	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		September 30, 2010		June 30, 2010
	(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Total revenues	$	488,370	$	529,982	$	636,976	$	585,947
Earnings from operations		40,188		51,277		158,121		128,109
Net earnings		13,246		18,608		85,219		66,502
Earnings available to common shareholders		10,163		15,529		81,978		63,315
Basic and diluted earings per common share	$	0.52	$	0.80	$	4.22	$	3.26
Weighted average common shares outstanding: basic and diluted		19,449,243		19,439,622		19,427,595		19,414,815

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we may utilize derivative financial instruments, among other strategies. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

The exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our variable rate debt obligations and one variable rate operating lease. We have used interest rate swap agreements and forward swaps to reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates. We enter into these arrangements with counterparties that are significant financial institutions with whom we generally have other financial arrangements. We are exposed to credit risk should these counterparties not be able to perform on their obligations.

Notional Amount			Fair Value			Effective Date	Expiration Date	Fixed Rate			Floating Rate
(In thousands)
$	22,560	(a),(b)	$	(91	)	5/10/2006	4/10/2012		5.06	%	1 Month LIBOR
	51,949	(a),(b)		(1,058	)	10/10/2006	10/10/2012		5.57	%	1 Month LIBOR
	17,821	(a)		(1,102	)	7/10/2006	7/10/2013		5.67	%	1 Month LIBOR
	244,165	(a)		(48,925	)	8/18/2006	8/10/2018		5.43	%	1 Month LIBOR
	11,600	(a)		(946	)	2/12/2007	2/10/2014		5.24	%	1 Month LIBOR
	7,795	(a)		(615	)	3/12/2007	3/10/2014		4.99	%	1 Month LIBOR
	7,800	(a)		(576	)	3/12/2007	3/10/2014		4.99	%	1 Month LIBOR
	9,100	(a),(b)		(727	)	8/15/2008	6/15/2015		3.62	%	1 Month LIBOR
	9,342	(a)		(800	)	8/29/2008	7/10/2015		4.04	%	1 Month LIBOR
	14,090	(a)		(1,369	)	9/30/2008	9/10/2015		4.16	%	1 Month LIBOR
	7,688	(a),(b)		(348	)	3/30/2009	3/30/2016		2.24	%	1 Month LIBOR
	10,500	(a),(b)		(392	)	8/15/2010	7/15/2017		2.15	%	1 Month LIBOR
	22,188	(a),(b)		(948	)	6/1/2011	6/1/2018		2.38	%	1 Month LIBOR
	44,167	(a),(b)		(1,035	)	8/15/2011	8/15/2018		1.86	%	1 Month LIBOR
	18,000	(a),(b)		(334	)	9/12/2011	9/10/2018		1.75	%	1 Month LIBOR
	15,099	(a),(c)		(47	)	3/28/2012	3/28/2019		1.42	%	1 Month LIBOR

(a) interest rate swap agreement
(b) forward swap
(c) operating lease

As of March 31, 2012, we had $538.6 million of variable rate debt obligations and $15.1 million of a variable rate operating lease. If the London Inter-Bank Offer Rate were to increase 100 basis points, the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt and a variable rate operating lease would decrease future earnings and cash flows by $0.4 million annually (after consideration of the effect of the above derivative contracts).

Additionally, our insurance subsidiaries’ fixed income investment portfolios expose us to interest rate risk. This interest rate risk is the price sensitivity of a fixed income security to changes in interest rates. As part of our insurance companies’ asset and liability management, actuaries estimate the cash flow patterns of our existing liabilities to determine their duration. These outcomes are compared to the characteristics of the assets that are currently supporting these liabilities assisting management in determining an asset allocation strategy for future investments that management believes will mitigate the overall effect of interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The exposure to market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates relates primarily to our Canadian business. Approximately 5.9%, 5.8% and 5.7% of our revenue was generated in Canada in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The result of a 10.0% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar would not be material to net income. We typically do not hedge any foreign currency risk since the exposure is not considered material.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Consolidated Financial Statements of AMERCO and its consolidated subsidiaries including the notes to such statements and the related schedules are set forth on the “F” pages hereto and are incorporated herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”), which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This "Controls and Procedures" section includes information concerning the controls and procedures evaluation referred to in the certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented in the section Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Following this discussion is the report of BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of AMERCO’s internal control over financial reporting as set forth below in this section. This section should be read in conjunction with the certifications of our CEO and CAO and the BDO USA, LLP report for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the CEO and CAO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s "disclosure controls and procedures" (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Our Disclosure Controls are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Our Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CAO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CAO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our Disclosure Controls were effective related to the above stated design purposes.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

The Company's management, including the CEO and CAO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the

fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management's assessment included evaluation of such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed both by our Internal Audit organization and our Finance organization.

Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year 2012. We reviewed the results of management's assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, BDO USA, LLP, has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting and has issued their report, which is included on the following page.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

AMERCO

Reno, Nevada

We have audited AMERCO and consolidated subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria .

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2012 and our report dated June 6, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

June 6, 2012

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required to be disclosed under this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to AMERCO’s definitive proxy statement, in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of the 2012 fiscal year.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of our Code of Ethics is posted on AMERCO’s web site at amerco.com/governance.aspx. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Current Report on Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on the Company’s website, at the web address and location specified above, unless otherwise required to file a Current Report on Form 8-K by NASDAQ rules and regulations.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required to be disclosed under this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of the 2012 fiscal year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required to be disclosed under this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of the 2012 fiscal year.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required to be disclosed under this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of the 2012 fiscal year.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required to be disclosed under this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of the 2012 fiscal year.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

	Page
Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 2012 and 2011	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years Ended March 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years Ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity - Years Ended March 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010	F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - Years Ended March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7
Financial Statement Schedules required to be filed by Item 8:
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of AMERCO	F-54
Schedule II - AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	F-58
Schedule V - AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries Supplemental Information (Concerning Property-Casualty Insurance Operations)	F-59

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, inapplicable, or the information is otherwise shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits:

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of AMERCO	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Registration Statement on form S-4 filed March 30, 2004, file no. 1-11255
3.2	Restated Bylaws of AMERCO	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2010, file no. 1-11255
4.1	Termination of Rights Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2008	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 11, 2008, file no. 1-11255
4.2	U-Haul Investors Club Base Indenture, dated February 12, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U. S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.3	First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 17, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.4	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated February 17, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.5	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated March 1, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 4, 2011, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
4.6	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 15, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.7	Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 15, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.8	Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 29, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 1, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.9	Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated March 29, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 1, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.10	Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 19, 2011, by and among AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.11	Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 7, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.12	Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated June 7, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 31, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.13	Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated June 14, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.14	Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture dated June 28, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 20, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.15	Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture dated July 20, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.16	Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture dated July 27, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.17	Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture dated August 31, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 28, 2011, file no. 1-11255
4.18	Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture dated November 8, 2011 by and between AMERCO and U. S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 18, 2012, file no. 1-11255
4.19	Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture dated January 7, 2012 by and between AMERCO and U. S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 26, 2012, file no. 1-11255
4.20	Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture dated May 14, 2012 by and between AMERCO and U. S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 14, 2012, file no. 1-11255
4.21	Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 12, 2011, by and between AMERCO and U.S. Bank National Association	Filed herewith

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
5.1	Opinion of Jennifer M. Settles, Secretary of AMERCO	Filed herewith
10.1	SAC Participation and Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2004 among SAC Holding Corporation, SAC Holding II Corporation, AMERCO, U-Haul International, Inc., and Law Debenture Trust Company of New York	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.2	U-Haul Dealership Contract	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year end March 31, 1993, file no. 1-11255
10.3	Share Repurchase and Registration Rights Agreement with Paul F. Shoen	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1993, file no. 1-11255
10.4	ESOP Loan Credit Agreement	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1990, file no. 1-11255
10.5	ESOP Loan Agreement	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1990, file no. 1-11255
10.6	Trust Agreement for the AMERCO Employee Savings, Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1990, file no. 1-11255
10.7	Amended Indemnification Agreement	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1990, file no. 1-11255
10.8	Indemnification Trust Agreement	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1990, file no. 1-11255
10.9	Management Agreement between Four SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of AMERCO	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1997, file no. 1-11255
10.10	Management Agreement between Five SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of AMERCO	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999, file no. 1-11255
10.11	Management Agreement between Nineteen SAC Self-Storage Limited Partnership and U-Haul	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, file no. 1-11255
10.12	Amended and Restated Promissory Note between SAC Holding Corporation and U-Haul International, Inc. (in an aggregate principal amount up to $47,500,000)	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Form S-4 Registration Statement filed on March 30, 2004, no. 333-114042
10.13	Amended and Restated Promissory Note between SAC Holding Corporation and U-Haul International, Inc. (in an aggregate principal amount up to $76,000,000)	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Form S-4 Registration Statement filed on March 30, 2004, no. 333-114042
10.14	Property Management Agreement	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
10.15	Property Management Agreements among Three-A through Three-D SAC Self-Storage Limited Partnership and the subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.16	U-Haul Dealership Contract between U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., and U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.17	Property Management Agreement between Mercury Partners, LP, Mercury 99, LLC and U-Haul Self-Storage Management (WPC), Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.18	Property Management Agreement between Three-SAC Self-Storage Corporation and U-Haul Co. (Canada), Ltd.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.19	Property Management Agreement among subsidiaries of U-Haul International and Galaxy Storage Two, L.P.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, file no. 1-11255
10.20	Merrill Lynch Commitment Letter (re first mortgage loan)	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 13, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.21	Morgan Stanley Commitment Letter	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 13, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.22	Merrill Lynch Commitment Letter (re loan to Amerco Real Estate Company)	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 13, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.23	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 8, 2005, among Amerco Real Estate Company, Amerco Real Estate Company of Texas, Inc., Amerco Real Estate Company of Alabama Inc., U-Haul Co. of Florida, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.24	Security Agreement dated June 8, 2005, by Amerco Real Estate Company, Amerco Real Estate Company of Texas, Inc., Amerco Real Estate Company of Alabama, Inc., U-Haul Co. of Florida, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc. and the Marketing Grantors named therein in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.25	Guarantee, dated June 8, 2005, by U-Haul International, Inc. in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.26	Promissory Note, dated June 8, 2005 by Amerco Real Estate Company, Amerco Real Estate Company of Texas, Inc., Amerco Real Estate Company of Alabama, Inc., U-Haul Co. of Florida, Inc. and U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
10.27	Form of Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing, dated June 8, 2005 in favor of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.28	Form of Promissory Note, dated June 8, 2005, in favor of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.29	Form of Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing, dated June 8, 2005, in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.30	Form of Promissory Note, dated June 8, 2005, in favor of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.31	Property Management Agreement between Subsidiaries of U-Haul and Five SAC RW MS, LLC., dated August 17, 2005.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.32	Credit agreement, dated November 10, 2005, among U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., U-Haul Company of Arizona and U-Haul International, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corporation.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.33	Property Management Agreement between Subsidiaries of U-Haul and Five SAC 905, LLC., dated September 23, 2005.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, file no. 1-11255
10.34	Property Management Agreements between Subsidiaries of U-Haul and subsidiaries of PM Partners, LP, dated June 25, 2005.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.35	Promissory note, dated December 1, 2005, by Private Mini Storage Realty, LP in favor of AMERCO.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.36	Promissory note dated December 1, 2005 by PMSI Investments, LP in favor of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.37	Property Management Agreements between Subsidiaries of U-Haul and subsidiaries of PM Preferred Properties, LP., dated June 25, 2005	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.38	Credit Agreement executed June 7, 2006, among U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona and U-Haul International, Inc. and BTMU Capital Corporation.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.39	Security and Collateral Agreement executed June 7, 2006, by U-Haul International, Inc., U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona, BTMU Capital Corporation, and Orange Truck Trust 2006	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.40	Guarantee executed June 7, 2006, made by U-Haul International, Inc. and AMERCO in favor of BTMU Capital Corp. and Orange Truck Trust 2006.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
10.41	First Amendment to Security Agreement (New Truck Term Loan Facility) executed June 7, 2006, among U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona, and U-Haul International, Inc., in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.42	Credit Agreement dated June 6, 2006, among U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona, and U-Haul International, Inc., and HVB	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.43	Security Agreement dated June 6, 2006, among U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona, and U-Haul International, Inc. in favor of HVB	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.44	Guarantee dated June 6, 2006, made by U-Haul International, Inc. in favor of HVB	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.45	Stockholder Agreement dated June 30, 2006 between Edward J. Shoen, James P. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen, Rosmarie T. Donovan, as Trustee, and Southwest Fiduciary, Inc., as Trustee	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2, filed with the Schedule 13-D, filed on July 13, 2006, file number 5-39669
10.46	Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Security Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2006, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2005, among Amerco Real Estate Company of Texas, Inc., Amerco Real Estate Company of Alabama, Inc., U-Haul Co. of Florida, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc. and the Marketing Grantors named therein in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Financial Corp.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 23, 2006, file no. 1-11255
10.47	Stockholder Agreement dated March 9, 2007 between Edward J. Shoen, James P. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen, Rosmarie T. Donovan, as Trustee, and Adagio Trust Company, as Trustee	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2, filed with the Schedule 13-D, filed on March 9, 2007, file number 5-39669
10.48	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2007, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2005, among U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., U-Haul Company of Arizona and U-Haul International, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corporation.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.49	Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2007, to the Security Agreement, dated June 28, 2005, among U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., U-Haul Company of Arizona and U-Haul International, Inc. in favor of Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corporation.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.50	2007-1 BOX TRUCK BASE INDENTURE, dated as of June 1, 2007, among U-HAUL S FLEET, LLC, 2007 TM-1, LLC, 2007 DC-1, LLC, and 2007 EL-1, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.51	SCHEDULE I TO 2007-1 BOX TRUCK BASE INDENTURE, dated as of June 1, 2007.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
10.52	SERIES 2007-1 SUPPLEMENT, dated as of June 1, 2007, among U-HAUL S FLEET, LLC, 2007 TM-1, LLC, 2007 DC-1, LLC, and 2007 EL-1, LLC, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, to the 2007-1 Box Truck Base Indenture.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.53	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Six-A SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.54	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Six-B SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.55	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Six-C SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.56	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Eight SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.57	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Nine SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.58	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Ten SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.59	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Eleven SAC Self-Storage Corporation and Eleven SAC Self-Storage Odenton, Inc. and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.60	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Twelve SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.61	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Thirteen SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.62	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Fourteen SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.63	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Fifteen SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255

Exhibit Number	Description	Page or Method of Filing
10.64	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Sixteen SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.65	Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement among Seventeen SAC Self-Storage Corporation and subsidiaries of U-Haul International, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.66	Promissory Note. SAC Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Borrower"), pay to U-Haul International, Inc., a Nevada corporation	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, file no. 1-11255
10.67	Omnibus Termination and Release (Aged Truck Revolving Loan Facility), dated February 8, 2008 among U-Haul Leasing & Sales Co., U-Haul Co. of Arizona and U-Haul International, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corporation	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 13, 2008, file no. 1-11255
10.68	Stockholder Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Edward J. Shoen, James P. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen, Rosmarie T. Donovan, as Trustee, and Dunham Trust Company, as Trustee	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2, filed with the Schedule 13-D, filed on June 26, 2009, file number 5-39669
10.69	2010-1 BOX TRUCK BASE INDENTURE, dated as of October 1, 2010, among 2010 U-HAUL S FLEET, LLC, 2010 TM-1, LLC, 2010 DC-1, LLC, and 2010 TT-1, LLC, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, as trustee.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, file number 1-11255
10.70	Schedule I to 2010-1 Base Indenture – Definitions List	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, file number 1-11255
10.71	SERIES 2010-1 SUPPLEMENT, dated as of October 1, 2010, among 2010 U-HAUL S FLEET, LLC, 2010 TM-1, LLC, 2010 DC-1, LLC, and 2010 TT-1, LLC, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, as trustee.	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, file number 1-11255
10.72	Pledge and Security Agreement, dated February 17, 2011, by and among AMERCO, U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co. and U.S. Bank National Association	Incorporated by reference to AMERCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 22, 2011, file no. 1-11255
10.73	Pledge and Security Agreement, dated February 17, 2011, by and among AMERCO, U-Haul Leasing and Sales Co. and U.S. Bank National Association