UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
(Mark One)

x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from __________ to_________
Commission
File Number
 
Registrants; States of Incorporation;
Address and Telephone Number
 
I.R.S. Employer
Identification Nos.
1-3525
 
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.  (A New York Corporation)
 
13-4922640
1-3457
 
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY (A Virginia Corporation)
 
54-0124790
1-3570
 
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY (An Indiana Corporation)
 
35-0410455
1-6543
 
OHIO POWER COMPANY (An Ohio Corporation)
 
31-4271000
0-343
 
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA (An Oklahoma Corporation)
 
73-0410895
1-3146
 
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (A Delaware Corporation)
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
Telephone (614) 716-1000
 
72-0323455

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Registrant
 
 
Title of each class
 
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
 
Common Stock, $6.50 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
Appalachian Power Company
 
None
 
 
Indiana Michigan Power Company
 
None
 
 
Ohio Power Company
 
None
 
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
 
None
 
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company
 
None
 
 





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant American Electric Power Company, Inc. is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes  x
No   o
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrants Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company, are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes   o
No   x
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes   o
No   x
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  x
No   o
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether American Electric Power Company, Inc., Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company have submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  x
No   o
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether American Electric Power Company, Inc. is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of ‘large accelerated filer’, ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘smaller reporting company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check One)
 
 
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers or smaller reporting companies.  See definitions of ‘large accelerated filer’, ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘smaller reporting company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check One)
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
 
Non-accelerated filer
x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrants are shell companies, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Yes   o
No   x

Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and are therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) to such Form 10-K.




 
 
Aggregate Market Value of Voting and Non-Voting Common Equity Held by Non-Affiliates of the Registrants as of June 30, 2014 the Last Trading Date of the Registrants' Most Recently Completed Second Fiscal Quarter
 
Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding of the Registrants as of December 31, 2014
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
 
$27,293,981,162
 
489,402,567

 
 
 
 
($6.50 par value)

Appalachian Power Company
 
None
 
13,499,500

 
 
 
 
(no par value)

Indiana Michigan Power Company
 
None
 
1,400,000

 
 
 
 
(no par value)

Ohio Power Company
 
None
 
27,952,473

 
 
 
 
(no par value)

Public Service Company of Oklahoma
 
None
 
9,013,000

 
 
 
 
($15 par value)

Southwestern Electric Power Company
 
None
 
7,536,640

 
 
 
 
($18 par value)


Note On Market Value Of Common Equity Held By Non-Affiliates

American Electric Power Company, Inc. owns all of the common stock of Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company (see Item 12 herein).





Documents Incorporated By Reference
Description
 
Part of Form 10-K into which Document is Incorporated
 
 
 
Portions of Annual Reports of the following companies for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:
 
Part II
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
 
 
Appalachian Power Company
 
 
Indiana Michigan Power Company
 
 
Ohio Power Company
 
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
 
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company
 
 
 
 
 
Portions of Proxy Statement of American Electric Power Company, Inc. for 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
 
Part III

This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by American Electric Power Company, Inc., Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company.  Information contained herein relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf.  Except for American Electric Power Company, Inc., each registrant makes no representation as to information relating to the other registrants.

You can access financial and other information at AEP’s website, including AEP’s Principles of Business Conduct (which also serves as a code of ethics applicable to Item 10 of this Form 10-K), certain committee charters and Principles of Corporate Governance.  The address is www.AEP.com.  AEP makes available, free of charge on its website, copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC.





TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
Number
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1A
1B
2
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
4
 
 
 
PART II
5
Market for Registrants' Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
6
7
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
7A
8
9
9A
Controls and Procedures
9B
Other Information
 
 
 
 
PART III
 
10
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
11
Executive Compensation
12
13
14
 
 
 
15
 
 
 
 
 




GLOSSARY OF TERMS

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below:
Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
AEGCo
 
AEP Generating Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
AEP or Parent
 
American Electric Power Company, Inc., an electric utility holding company.
AEP East Companies
 
APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo.
AEP River Operations
 
AEP’s inland river transportation subsidiary, AEP River Operations LLC, operating primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi rivers.
AEP System
 
American Electric Power System, an electric system, owned and operated by AEP subsidiaries.
AEP Utilities
 
AEP Utilities, Inc., a subsidiary of AEP, and a holding company for TCC, TNC and our interest in ETT.
AEP West Companies
 
PSO, SWEPCo, TCC and TNC.
AEPSC
 
American Electric Power Service Corporation, an AEP service subsidiary providing management and professional services to AEP and its subsidiaries.
AEPTCo
 
AEP Transmission Company, LLC, a subsidiary of AEPTHCo, an intermediate holding company that owns seven wholly-owned transmission companies.
AEPTHCo
 
AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a subsidiary of AEP, an intermediate holding company that owns our transmission operations joint ventures and AEPTCo.
AFUDC
 
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.
AGR
 
AEP Generation Resources Inc., a nonregulated AEP subsidiary in the Generation & Marketing segment.
APCo
 
Appalachian Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
APSC
 
Arkansas Public Service Commission.
CAA
 
Clean Air Act.
CO 2
 
Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Cook Plant
 
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, a two-unit, 2,191 MW nuclear plant owned by I&M.
CRES provider
 
Competitive Retail Electric Service providers under Ohio law that target retail customers by offering alternative generation service.
CSPCo
 
Columbus Southern Power Company, a former AEP electric utility subsidiary that was merged into OPCo effective December 31, 2011.
EPACT
 
The Energy Policy Act of 2005.
ERCOT
 
Electric Reliability Council of Texas regional transmission organization.
ESP
 
Electric Security Plans, a PUCO requirement for electric utilities to adjust their rates by filing with the PUCO.
ETT
 
Electric Transmission Texas, LLC, an equity interest joint venture between AEP and Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company formed to own and operate electric transmission facilities in ERCOT.
Federal EPA
 
United States Environmental Protection Agency.
FERC
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
I&M
 
AEP Indiana Michigan Power Company, Inc.
IMTCo
 
Indiana Michigan Transmission Company Inc.
Interconnection Agreement
 
An agreement by and among APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo, which defined the sharing of costs and benefits associated with their respective generation plants.  This agreement was terminated January 1, 2014.
IURC
 
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
KGPCo
 
Kingsport Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
KPCo
 
Kentucky Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
kV
 
Kilovolt.
MISO
 
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator.
MMBtu
 
Million British Thermal Units.
MPSC
 
Michigan Public Service Commission.

i



Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
MW
 
Megawatt.
NO x
 
Nitrogen oxide.
Nonutility Money Pool
 
Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain nonutility subsidiaries.
NRC
 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
OATT
 
Open Access Transmission Tariff.
OCC
 
Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma.
OHTCo
 
AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc.
OKTCo
 
AEP Oklahoma Transmission Company, Inc.
OPCo
 
Ohio Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
OVEC
 
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, which is 43.47% owned by AEP.
PJM
 
Pennsylvania – New Jersey – Maryland regional transmission organization.
PM
 
Particulate Matter.
PSO
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
PUCO
 
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
PUCT
 
Public Utility Commission of Texas.
REP
 
Texas Retail Electric Provider.
Rockport Plant
 
A generation plant, consisting of two 1,310 MW coal-fired generating units near Rockport, Indiana.  AEGCo and I&M jointly-own Unit 1.  In 1989, AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction with Wilmington Trust Company, an unrelated, unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2.
RTO
 
Regional Transmission Organization, responsible for moving electricity over large interstate areas.
Sabine
 
Sabine Mining Company, a lignite mining company that is a consolidated variable interest entity for AEP and SWEPCo.
SEC
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
SO 2
 
Sulfur dioxide.
SPP
 
Southwest Power Pool regional transmission organization.
SWEPCo
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
TA
 
Transmission Agreement, effective November 2010, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo with AEPSC as agent.
TCA
 
Transmission Coordination Agreement dated January 1, 1997, by and among, PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC, in connection with the operation of the transmission assets of the two public utility subsidiaries.
TCC
 
AEP Texas Central Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
TNC
 
AEP Texas North Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
Utility Money Pool
 
Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain utility subsidiaries.
Virginia SCC
 
Virginia State Corporation Commission.
WPCo
 
Wheeling Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
WVPSC
 
Public Service Commission of West Virginia.

ii



FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report made by AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Many forward-looking statements appear in “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” but there are others throughout this document which may be identified by words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “continue” and similar expressions, and include statements reflecting future results or guidance and statements of outlook.  These matters are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.  Forward-looking statements in this document are presented as of the date of this document.  Except to the extent required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.  Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are:
Ÿ
The economic climate, growth or contraction within and changes in market demand and demographic patterns in our service territory.
Ÿ
Inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends.
Ÿ
Volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability of capital on reasonable terms and developments impairing our ability to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt at attractive rates.
Ÿ
The availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material.
Ÿ
Electric load, customer growth and the impact of competition, including competition for retail customers.
Ÿ
Weather conditions, including storms and drought conditions, and our ability to recover significant storm restoration costs.
Ÿ
Available sources and costs of, and transportation for, fuels and the creditworthiness and performance of fuel suppliers and transporters.
Ÿ
Availability of necessary generation capacity and the performance of our generation plants.
Ÿ
Our ability to recover increases in fuel and other energy costs through regulated or competitive electric rates.
Ÿ
Our ability to build or acquire generation capacity and transmission lines and facilities (including our ability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals and permits) when needed at acceptable prices and terms and to recover those costs.
Ÿ
New legislation, litigation and government regulation, including oversight of nuclear generation, energy commodity trading and new or heightened requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot or particulate matter and other substances or additional regulation of fly ash and similar combustion products that could impact the continued operation, cost recovery and/or profitability of our generation plants and related assets.
Ÿ
Evolving public perception of the risks associated with fuels used before, during and after the generation of electricity, including nuclear fuel.
Ÿ
A reduction in the federal statutory tax rate could result in an accelerated return of deferred federal income taxes to customers.
Ÿ
Timing and resolution of pending and future rate cases, negotiations and other regulatory decisions, including rate or other recovery of new investments in generation, distribution and transmission service and environmental compliance.
Ÿ
Resolution of litigation.
Ÿ
Our ability to constrain operation and maintenance costs.
Ÿ
Our ability to develop and execute a strategy based on a view regarding prices of electricity and other energy-related commodities.
Ÿ
Prices and demand for power that we generate and sell at wholesale.
Ÿ
Changes in technology, particularly with respect to new, developing, alternative or distributed sources of generation.
Ÿ
Our ability to recover through rates or market prices any remaining unrecovered investment in generation units that may be retired before the end of their previously projected useful lives.
Ÿ
Volatility and changes in markets for capacity and electricity, coal and other energy-related commodities, particularly changes in the price of natural gas and capacity auction returns.

iii



Ÿ
Changes in utility regulation and the allocation of costs within regional transmission organizations, including ERCOT, PJM and SPP.
Ÿ
The transition to market for generation in Ohio, including the implementation of ESPs and our ability to recover investments in our Ohio generation assets.
Ÿ
Our ability to successfully and profitably manage our separate competitive generation assets.
Ÿ
Changes in the creditworthiness of the counterparties with whom we have contractual arrangements, including participants in the energy trading market.
Ÿ
Actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of our debt.
Ÿ
The impact of volatility in the capital markets on the value of the investments held by our pension, other postretirement benefit plans, captive insurance entity and nuclear decommissioning trust and the impact of such volatility on future funding requirements.
Ÿ
Accounting pronouncements periodically issued by accounting standard-setting bodies.
Ÿ
Other risks and unforeseen events, including wars, the effects of terrorism (including increased security costs), embargoes, cyber security threats and other catastrophic events.
The forward looking statements of AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made.  AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information.  For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of this report.


iv



PART I

ITEM 1.   BUSINESS

GENERAL

Overview and Description of Material Subsidiaries

AEP was incorporated under the laws of the State of New York in 1906 and reorganized in 1925. It is a public utility holding company that owns, directly or indirectly, all of the outstanding common stock of its public utility subsidiaries and varying percentages of other subsidiaries.

The service areas of AEP’s public utility subsidiaries cover portions of the states of Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. The transmission facilities of AEP’s public utility subsidiaries are interconnected and their operations are coordinated.  Transmission networks are interconnected with extensive distribution facilities in the territories served. The public utility subsidiaries of AEP have traditionally provided electric service, consisting of generation, transmission and distribution, on an integrated basis to their retail customers. Restructuring laws in Michigan, Ohio and the ERCOT area of Texas have caused AEP public utility subsidiaries in those states to unbundle previously integrated regulated rates for their retail customers.  In Ohio, AEP’s regulated utility operates its distribution and transmission assets while its former generation assets are owned and operated by a competitive generation affiliate.

The member companies of the AEP System have contractual, financial and other business relationships with the other member companies, such as participation in the AEP System savings and retirement plans and tax returns, sales of electricity and transportation and handling of fuel. The companies of the AEP System also obtain certain accounting, administrative, information systems, engineering, financial, legal, maintenance and other services at cost from a common provider, AEPSC.

As of December 31, 2014 , the subsidiaries of AEP had a total of 18,529 employees. Because it is a holding company rather than an operating company, AEP has no employees. The material subsidiaries of AEP are:

APCo

Organized in Virginia in 1926, APCo is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 959,000 retail customers in the southwestern portion of Virginia and southern West Virginia, and in supplying and marketing electric power at wholesale to other electric utility companies, municipalities and other market participants. APCo owns 7,877 MW of generating capacity.  APCo uses its generation to serve its retail and other customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , APCo had 1,902 employees. Among the principal industries served by APCo are paper, rubber, coal mining, textile mill products and stone, clay and glass products. APCo is a member of PJM.  APCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

I&M

Organized in Indiana in 1907, I&M is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 588,000 retail customers in northern and eastern Indiana and southwestern Michigan, and in supplying and marketing electric power at wholesale to other electric utility companies, rural electric cooperatives, municipalities and other market participants.  I&M owns or leases 4,518 MW of generating capacity, which it uses to serve its retail and other customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , I&M had 2,551 employees. Among the principal industries served are primary metals, transportation equipment, electrical and electronic machinery, fabricated metal products, rubber and chemicals and allied products, rubber products and transportation equipment.  I&M is a member of PJM.  I&M is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.


1



KPCo

Organized in Kentucky in 1919, KPCo is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 171,000 retail customers in eastern Kentucky, and in supplying and marketing electric power at wholesale to other electric utility companies, municipalities and other market participants.  KPCo owns 1,858 MW of generating capacity.  KPCo uses its generation to serve its retail and other customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , KPCo had 595 employees. Among the principal industries served are petroleum refining, coal mining and chemical production.  KPCo is a member of PJM.  KPCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

KGPCo

Organized in Virginia in 1917, KGPCo provides electric service to approximately 47,000 retail customers in Kingsport and eight neighboring communities in northeastern Tennessee. KGPCo does not own any generating facilities and is a member of PJM. It purchases electric power from APCo for distribution to its customers. As of December 31, 2014 , KGPCo had 49 employees. KGPCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

OPCo

Organized in Ohio in 1907 and re-incorporated in 1924, OPCo is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 1,466,000 retail customers in Ohio.  Following corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets in December 2013, OPCo purchases energy and capacity to serve generation service customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo had 1,516 employees.  Among the principal industries served by OPCo are primary metals, chemicals and allied products, health services, electronic machinery, petroleum refining, and rubber and plastic products. OPCo is a member of PJM.  OPCo is part of AEP’s Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment.

PSO

Organized in Oklahoma in 1913, PSO is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 542,000 retail customers in eastern and southwestern Oklahoma, and in supplying and marketing electric power at wholesale to other electric utility companies, municipalities, rural electric cooperatives and other market participants.  PSO owns 4,436 MW of generating capacity, which it uses to serve its retail and other customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , PSO had 1,133 employees. Among the principal industries served by PSO are paper manufacturing and timber products, natural gas and oil extraction, transportation, non-metallic mineral production, oil refining and steel processing. PSO is a member of SPP.  PSO is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

SWEPCo

Organized in Delaware in 1912, SWEPCo is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 528,000 retail customers in northeastern and panhandle of Texas, northwestern Louisiana and western Arkansas and in supplying and marketing electric power at wholesale to other electric utility companies, municipalities, rural electric cooperatives and other market participants. SWEPCo owns 5,779 MW of generating capacity, which it uses to serve its retail and other customers.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo had 1,468 employees. Among the principal industries served by SWEPCo are natural gas and oil production, petroleum refining, manufacturing of pulp and paper, chemicals, food processing and metal refining. The territory served by SWEPCo also includes several military installations, colleges and universities. SWEPCo also owns and operates a lignite coal mining operation. SWEPCo is a member of SPP.  SWEPCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.


2




TCC

Organized in Texas in 1945, TCC is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 817,000 retail customers through REPs in southern Texas. As of December 31, 2014 , TCC had 1,056 employees. Among the principal industries served by TCC are chemical and petroleum refining, chemicals and allied products, oil and natural gas extraction, food processing, metal refining, plastics and machinery equipment. TCC is a member of ERCOT. TCC is part of AEP’s Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment.

TNC

Organized in Texas in 1927, TNC is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 189,000 retail customers through REPs in west and central Texas. TNC’s generating capacity has been transferred to an affiliate at TNC’s cost pursuant to an agreement effective through 2027. As of December 31, 2014 , TNC had 323 employees. Among the principal industries served by TNC are petroleum refining, agriculture and the manufacturing or processing of cotton seed products, oil products, precision and consumer metal products, meat products and gypsum products. The territory served by TNC also includes several military installations and correctional facilities. TNC is a member of ERCOT.  TNC is part of AEP’s Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment.

WPCo

Organized in West Virginia in 1883 and reincorporated in 1911, WPCo provides electric service to approximately 41,000 retail customers in northern West Virginia. As of December 31, 2014, WPCo did not own any generating facilities. On January 31, 2015, WPCo acquired an interest in a 780 MW generating unit owned by AGR. WPCo is a member of PJM. Prior to acquiring the 780 MW generating unit interest, WPCo purchased electric power from AGR for distribution to its customers. As of December 31, 2014 , WPCo had 53 employees.  WPCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

AEGCo

Organized in Ohio in 1982, AEGCo is an electric generating company. AEGCo owns 2,496 MW of generating capacity.  AEGCo sells power at wholesale to AGR, I&M and KPCo. As of December 31, 2014 , AEGCo had 70 employees.  AEGCo is part of AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.

AGR

Organized in Delaware in 2011, AGR is a competitive generation company that generates power and sells it into the market.  AGR also engages in power trading activities.  Pursuant to a Power Supply Agreement (PSA) between AGR and OPCo, AGR supplies capacity for OPCo’s switched and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015.  AGR also supplied the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that was not acquired through auctions in 2014 under the PSA.  Following the transfer to WPCo of the 780MW generating unit interest on January 31, 2015, AGR owns 9,159 MW of generating capacity, with rights to an additional 1,186 MW pursuant to a unit power agreement with AEGCo through 2017. As of December 31, 2014 , AGR had 917 employees.  AGR is part of AEP’s Generation & Marketing segment.

AEPTHCo

Organized in Delaware in 2012, AEPTHCo is a holding company for AEP’s transmission operations joint ventures.  AEPTHCo also owns AEPTCo, a holding company for seven FERC-regulated transmission-only electric utilities, each of which is geographically aligned with our existing utility operating companies. The transmission companies develop and own new transmission assets that are physically connected to AEP’s system.  Individual transmission companies have obtained the approvals necessary to operate in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma and West Virginia, subject to any applicable siting requirements, and are authorized to submit projects for

3



commission approval in Virginia. The application for regulatory approval to operate in Louisiana is under consideration, while the application for regulatory approval to operate in Arkansas was denied. Neither AEPTCo nor the transmission companies have any employees. Instead, AEPSC and certain of our utility subsidiaries provide the services required by these entities. AEPTCo is part of the AEP Transmission Holdco segment.

Service Company Subsidiary

AEP also owns a service company subsidiary, AEPSC. AEPSC provides accounting, administrative, information systems, engineering, financial, legal, maintenance and other services at cost to the AEP affiliated companies. The executive officers of AEP and certain of its public utility subsidiaries are employees of AEPSC. As of December 31, 2014 , AEPSC had 5,569 employees.

The following table illustrates certain regulatory information with respect to the states in which the public utility subsidiaries of AEP operate:
Jurisdiction
 
Percentage of AEP System Retail Revenues (a)
 
AEP Utility Subsidiaries Operating in that Jurisdiction
 
Authorized Return on Equity (b)
Ohio
 
25%
 
OPCo
 
10.20%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Texas
 
14%
 
TCC
 
9.96%
 
 
 
 
TNC
 
9.96%
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo
 
9.65%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Virginia
 
13%
 
APCo
 
9.70%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
West Virginia
 
11%
 
APCo
 
10.00%
 
 
 
 
WPCo
 
10.00%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oklahoma
 
11%
 
PSO
 
10.15%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indiana
 
10%
 
I&M
 
10.20%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Louisiana
 
5%
 
SWEPCo
 
10.00%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kentucky
 
5%
 
KPCo
 
10.50%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arkansas
 
3%
 
SWEPCo
 
10.25%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
 
2%
 
I&M
 
10.20%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tennessee
 
1%
 
KGPCo
 
12.00%

(a)
Represents the percentage of public utility subsidiaries revenue from sales to retail customers to total public utility subsidiaries revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 .
(b)
Identifies the predominant authorized return on equity and may not include other, less significant, permitted recovery.  Actual return on equity varies from authorized return on equity.



4



CLASSES OF SERVICE

The principal classes of service from which the public utility subsidiaries of AEP derive revenues and the amount of such revenues during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
3,329

 
$
3,216

 
$
2,993

Commercial Sales
 
2,032

 
2,002

 
1,886

Industrial Sales
 
2,125

 
2,029

 
1,951

PJM Net Charges
 
(62
)
 
10

 
(25
)
Provision for Rate Refund
 
(2
)
 
(16
)
 
(3
)
Other Retail Sales
 
182

 
172

 
164

Total Retail Revenues
 
7,604

 
7,413

 
6,966

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
1,530

 
1,671

 
1,583

Transmission
 
113

 
133

 
103

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
1,643

 
1,804

 
1,686

Other Electric Revenues
 
125

 
90

 
98

Other Operating Revenues
 
25

 
39

 
35

Sales to Affiliates
 
87

 
646

 
633

Total Revenues Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment
 
9,484

 
9,992

 
9,418

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities Segment
 
 

 
 

 
 

Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential Sales
 
2,313

 
2,164

 
2,121

Commercial Sales
 
1,178

 
1,161

 
1,331

Industrial Sales
 
503

 
549

 
821

PJM Net Charges
 
48

 
21

 
22

Provision for Rate Refund
 
(12
)
 
22

 
(3
)
Other Retail Sales
 
40

 
39

 
41

Total Retail Revenues
 
4,070

 
3,956

 
4,333

Wholesale Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Off-System Sales
 
143

 
31

 
57

Transmission
 
278

 
228

 
205

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
421

 
259

 
262

Other Electric Revenues
 
51

 
56

 
58

Other Operating Revenues
 
11

 
8

 
6

Sales to Affiliates
 
261

 
199

 
159

Total Revenues Transmission and Distribution Utilities Segment
 
4,814

 
4,478

 
4,818

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP Transmission Holdco Segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transmission Revenues
 
74

 
27

 
7

Sales to Affiliates
 
118

 
51

 
17

Total Revenues AEP Transmission Holdco Segment
 
192

 
78

 
24

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Generation & Marketing Segment
 
 

 
 

 
 

Generation Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Affiliated
 
1,307

 
2,457

 
2,584

Nonaffiliated
 
1,397

 
314

 
282

Trading, Marketing and Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Affiliated
 
159

 

 
1

Nonaffiliated
 
962

 
868

 
572

Wind Generation Revenues
 
 
 
 

 
 

Nonaffiliated
 
25

 
26

 
28

Total Revenues Generation & Marketing Segment
 
$
3,850

 
$
3,665

 
$
3,467



5



APCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
1,257,273

 
$
1,219,649

 
$
1,159,576

Commercial Sales
 
585,929

 
583,835

 
576,153

Industrial Sales
 
690,432

 
697,043

 
701,603

PJM Net Charges
 
13,447

 
4,998

 
(13,049
)
Provision for Rate Refund
 
(6,085
)
 

 

Other Retail Sales
 
82,484

 
77,182

 
72,455

Total Retail Revenues
 
2,623,480

 
2,582,707

 
2,496,738

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
191,194

 
433,575

 
409,527

Transmission
 
26,898

 
21,049

 
14,059

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
218,092

 
454,624

 
423,586

Other Electric Revenues
 
57,830

 
22,246

 
28,438

Total Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
2,899,402

 
3,059,577

 
2,948,762

Sales to Affiliates
 
144,437

 
347,484

 
318,199

Other Revenues
 
9,239

 
10,345

 
9,970

Total Revenues
 
$
3,053,078

 
$
3,417,406

 
$
3,276,931


I&M
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
588,445

 
$
565,822

 
$
505,142

Commercial Sales
 
390,439

 
400,810

 
377,302

Industrial Sales
 
462,982

 
455,067

 
430,042

PJM Net Charges
 
(60,912
)
 
3,318

 
(9,003
)
Provision for Rate Refund
 
(592
)
 

 

Other Retail Sales
 
6,895

 
6,945

 
6,508

Total Retail Revenues
 
1,387,257

 
1,431,962

 
1,309,991

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
759,531

 
571,802

 
481,000

Transmission
 
(9,444
)
 
4,145

 
2,092

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
750,087

 
575,947

 
483,092

Other Electric Revenues
 
11,765

 
14,348

 
16,986

Total Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
2,149,109

 
2,022,257

 
1,810,069

Sales to Affiliates
 
98,577

 
341,686

 
385,460

Other Revenues
 
2,048

 
2,916

 
4,582

Total Revenues
 
$
2,249,734

 
$
2,366,859

 
$
2,200,111


OPCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
1,768,143

 
$
1,676,138

 
$
1,636,808

Commercial Sales
 
732,227

 
763,820

 
945,233

Industrial Sales
 
405,742

 
468,358

 
742,235

PJM Net Charges
 
47,532

 
6,916

 
(18,831
)
Provision for Rate Refund
 
(11,937
)
 
22,091

 
(2,577
)
Other Retail Sales
 
14,887

 
15,881

 
18,113

Total Retail Revenues
 
2,956,594

 
2,953,204

 
3,320,981

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
143,037

 
563,040

 
661,513

Transmission
 
78,510

 
17,699

 
10,114

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
221,547

 
580,739

 
671,627

Other Electric Revenues
 
26,785

 
28,281

 
29,508

Total Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
3,204,926

 
3,562,224

 
4,022,116

Sales to Affiliates
 
165,216

 
1,184,994

 
886,695

Other Revenues
 
6,778

 
15,397

 
19,385

Total Revenues
 
$
3,376,920

 
$
4,762,615

 
$
4,928,196



6



PSO
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
561,175

 
$
530,446

 
$
512,372

Commercial Sales
 
375,535

 
351,521

 
331,125

Industrial Sales
 
260,380

 
234,072

 
209,446

Other Retail Sales
 
78,666

 
73,649

 
70,894

Total Retail Revenues
 
1,275,756

 
1,189,688

 
1,123,837

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
13,790

 
34,636

 
37,484

Transmission
 
36,540

 
36,393

 
30,669

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
50,330

 
71,029

 
68,153

Other Electric Revenues
 
14,221

 
16,994

 
14,593

Total Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
1,340,307

 
1,277,711

 
1,206,583

Sales to Affiliates
 
7,054

 
14,246

 
22,603

Other Revenues
 
4,215

 
3,565

 
3,752

Total Revenues
 
$
1,351,576

 
$
1,295,522

 
$
1,232,938


SWEPCo
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
Description
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Retail Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential Sales
 
$
580,367

 
$
586,517

 
$
512,578

Commercial Sales
 
457,217

 
472,264

 
404,204

Industrial Sales
 
348,901

 
316,282

 
298,604

Provision for Rate Refund
 
4,976

 
(16,110
)
 
(1,207
)
Other Retail Sales
 
8,341

 
8,360

 
8,074

Total Retail Revenues
 
1,399,802

 
1,367,313

 
1,222,253

Wholesale Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

Off-System Sales
 
339,286

 
294,594

 
247,118

Transmission
 
55,095

 
59,097

 
48,404

Total Wholesale Revenues
 
394,381

 
353,691

 
295,522

Other Electric Revenues
 
23,680

 
21,571

 
20,758

Total Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
1,817,863

 
1,742,575

 
1,538,533

Sales to Affiliates
 
26,278

 
51,812

 
37,441

Other Revenues
 
2,256

 
1,416

 
1,860

Total Revenues
 
$
1,846,397

 
$
1,795,803

 
$
1,577,834



7



FINANCING

General

Companies within the AEP System generally use short-term debt to finance working capital needs.  Short-term debt may also be used to finance acquisitions, construction and redemption or repurchase of outstanding securities until such needs can be financed with long-term debt.  In recent history, short-term funding needs have been provided for by cash on hand, borrowing under AEP's revolving credit agreements and AEP’s commercial paper program.  Funds are made available to subsidiaries under the AEP corporate borrowing program.  Certain public utility subsidiaries of AEP also sell accounts receivable to provide liquidity.  See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, under the heading entitled Financial Condition for additional information concerning short-term funding and our access to bank lines of credit, commercial paper and capital markets.

AEP’s revolving credit agreements (which backstop the commercial paper program) include covenants and events of default typical for this type of facility, including a maximum debt/capital test.   In addition, the acceleration of AEP’s payment obligations, or the obligations of certain of our major subsidiaries, prior to maturity under any other agreement or instrument relating to debt outstanding in excess of $50 million, would cause an event of default under these credit agreements. As of December 31, 2014 , AEP was in compliance with its debt covenants.  With the exception of a voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency, any event of default has either or both a cure period or notice requirement before termination of the agreements.  A voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency of AEP or one of its significant subsidiaries would be considered an immediate termination event.  See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, under the heading entitled Financial Condition for additional information with respect to AEP’s credit agreements.

AEP’s subsidiaries have also utilized, and expect to continue to utilize, additional financing arrangements, such as securitization financings and leasing arrangements, including the leasing of coal transportation equipment and facilities.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER MATTERS

General

AEP’s subsidiaries are currently subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities with regard to air and water-quality control and other environmental matters, and are subject to zoning and other regulation by local authorities.  The environmental issues that we believe are potentially material to the AEP system are outlined below.

Clean Water Act Requirements

Our operations are subject to the Federal Clean Water Act, which prohibits the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States except pursuant to appropriate permits, and regulates systems that withdraw surface water for use in our power plants.  In 2014, the Federal EPA issued a final rule setting forth standards for existing power plants that is intended to reduce mortality of aquatic organisms pinned against a plant’s cooling water intake screen (impingement) or entrained in the cooling water.  The standards affect all plants withdrawing more than two million gallons of cooling water per day and establish specific intake design and intake velocity standards meant to allow fish to avoid or escape impingement.  Compliance with this standard is required within eight years of the effective date of the final rule.  The standard for entrainment for existing facilities requires a site-specific evaluation of the available measures for reducing entrainment.  Challenges to this final rule have been consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and additional changes could be made to this rule as a result of review by the court.

The Federal EPA is also engaged in rulemaking to update the technology-based standards that govern discharges from new and existing power plants under the Clean Water Act’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program.  These standards were last updated over 20 years ago, and the Federal EPA proposed revised standards in 2013.  A final rule is expected in September 2015. For additional information, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues.

8



Coal Ash Regulation

Our operations produce a number of different coal combustion products, including fly ash, bottom ash, gypsum and other materials.  In December 2008, the breach of a dike at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston Station resulted in a spill of several million cubic yards of ash into a nearby river and onto private properties, prompting federal and state reviews of ash storage and disposal practices at many coal-fired electric generating facilities, including ours.  AEP operates 37 ash ponds, and we manage these ponds in a manner that complies with state and local requirements, including dam safety rules designed to assure the structural integrity of these facilities.  We also operate a number of dry disposal facilities in accordance with state standards, including ground water monitoring and other applicable standards.  In December 2014, the Federal EPA signed a rule to regulate the disposal and beneficial re-use of coal combustion residuals, including fly ash and bottom ash generated at coal-fired electric generating units.  The final rule requires certain standards for location, groundwater monitoring and dam stability to be met at landfills and certain surface impoundments at operating facilities on a schedule spanning approximately four years after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. If existing disposal facilities cannot meet these standards, they will be required to close, but the time frame for closure may be extended if adequate alternative disposal options are not available. Extensions are available for completion of certain activities. For additional information regarding the Federal EPA action taken to regulate the disposal and beneficial re-use of coal combustion residuals and the potential impact on our operations, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues-Coal Combustion Residual Rule.

Clean Air Act Requirements

The CAA establishes a comprehensive program to protect and improve the nation’s air quality and control mobile and stationary sources of air emissions.  The major CAA programs affecting our power plants are described below.  The states implement and administer many of these programs and could impose additional or more stringent requirements.

The Acid Rain Program

The 1990 Amendments to the CAA include a cap-and-trade emission reduction program for SO 2 emissions from power plants.  By 2000, the program established a nationwide cap on power plant SO 2 emissions of 8.9 million tons per year and required further reductions in 2010.  The 1990 Amendments also contain requirements for power plants to reduce NO x emissions through the use of available combustion controls.

The success of the SO 2 cap-and-trade program encouraged the Federal EPA and the states to use it as a model for other emission reduction programs.  We continue to meet our obligations under the Acid Rain Program through the installation of controls, use of alternate fuels and participation in the emissions allowance markets.  Subsequent programs developed by the Federal EPA have imposed more stringent SO 2 and NO x emission reduction requirements than the Acid Rain Program on many of our facilities.  We have installed additional controls and taken other actions to achieve compliance with these programs.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

The CAA requires the Federal EPA to review the available scientific data for criteria pollutants periodically and establish a concentration level in the ambient air for those substances that is adequate to protect the public health and welfare with an extra safety margin.  The Federal EPA also can list additional pollutants and develop concentration levels for them.  These concentration levels are known as national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).

Each state identifies the areas within its boundaries that meet the NAAQS (attainment areas) and those that do not (nonattainment areas).  Each state must develop a state implementation plan (SIP) to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS and maintain good air quality in attainment areas.  All SIPs are submitted to the Federal EPA for approval.  If a state fails to develop adequate plans, the Federal EPA develops and implements a plan.  As the Federal EPA reviews the NAAQS and establishes new concentration levels, the attainment status of areas can change and states may be required to develop new SIPs.  In 2008, the Federal EPA issued revised NAAQS for both ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ).  The PM 2.5 standard was remanded by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, and a new

9



rule was signed by the administrator in December 2012 that lowers the annual standard.  A new ozone standard was proposed in 2014.  The Federal EPA also adopted a new short-term standard for SO 2 in 2010, a lower standard for NO x in 2010, and confirmed the existing standard for lead in 2014.  The existing standard for carbon monoxide was retained in 2011.  The states are in the process of developing new SIPs for the SO 2 , NO x and PM 2.5 standards, which could result in more stringent emission limitations being imposed on our facilities. Additional designations of SO 2 nonattainment areas and finalization of a more stringent ozone standard could also lead to the imposition of more stringent emission limitations on our facilities.

In 2005, the Federal EPA issued the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which requires additional reductions in SO 2 and NO x emissions from power plants and assists states developing new SIPs to meet the NAAQS.   In August 2011, the Federal EPA issued a final rule to replace CAIR (the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)) that contains more stringent requirements to control SO 2 and NO x emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units in 27 states and the District of Columbia.  Petitions for review were filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and CSAPR was vacated.  That decision was subsequently reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court and remanded back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for further proceedings. The Federal EPA filed a motion to lift the stay and allow Phase I of CSAPR to take effect on January 1, 2015 and Phase II to take effect on January 1, 2017. The court granted the Federal EPA's motion, an interim final rule has been issued, and further consideration of the petitions for review on CSAPR will continue during 2015 while Phase I is in effect. For additional information regarding CAIR and CSAPR, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues-Clean Air Act Requirements.

Hazardous Air Pollutants

As a result of the 1990 Amendments to the CAA, the Federal EPA investigated hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from the electric utility sector and submitted a report to Congress, identifying mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants as warranting further study.  In 2011, the Federal EPA issued a final rule setting Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards for new and existing coal and oil-fired utility units and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for emissions from new and modified power plants.  Petitions for review of the MACT standards were denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, but in 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether Federal EPA should have considered costs in determining if it was appropriate and necessary to regulate hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric generating units. For additional information regarding MACT, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues-Clean Air Act Requirements.

Regional Haze

The CAA establishes visibility goals for certain federally designated areas, including national parks, and requires states to submit SIPs that will demonstrate reasonable progress toward preventing impairment of visibility in these areas (Regional Haze program).  In 2005, the Federal EPA issued its Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR), detailing how the CAA’s best available retrofit technology requirements will be applied to facilities built between 1962 and 1977 that emit more than 250 tons per year of certain pollutants in specific industrial categories, including power plants.

PSO is in the process of implementing a settlement with the Federal EPA in order to comply with the Regional Haze program requirements in Oklahoma. Federal EPA is likely to issue a Federal Implementation Plan for Arkansas in 2015.  For additional information regarding CAVR and the Regional Haze program requirements, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues-Clean Air Act Requirements.


10



Climate Change

We continue to support a federal legislative approach to energy policy as the most effective means of reducing emissions of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases (generally referred to as CO 2 ) that recognizes that a reliable and affordable electricity supply is vital to economic recovery and growth.  We do not believe regulating CO 2 emissions under the CAA is the appropriate solution.  In the past decade, we have taken voluntary actions to reduce and offset our CO 2 emissions, and have complied with state energy policies designed to reduce carbon emissions through increasing reliance on renewable resources and expanding our energy efficiency programs.  

AEP's total CO 2 emissions in 2014 (not including our ownership in the Kyger Creek and Clifty Creek plants) were approximately 120 million metric tons.  This represents a reduction of 18% compared to our 2005 CO 2 emission of approximately 146 million metric tons. We expect minor variations in CO 2 emissions in the near-term as potential sales and emission increases from rebounding economic activity to be offset by expected changes in generation sources.

We expect our emissions to continue to decline over time as we diversify our generating sources and operate fewer coal units.  The projected decline in coal-fired generation is due to a number of factors, including the ongoing cost of operating older units, the relative cost of coal and natural gas as fuel sources, increasing environmental regulations requiring significant capital investments and changing commodity market fundamentals.  Our strategy for this transformation includes diversifying our fuel portfolio and generating more electricity from natural gas, increasing energy efficiency and investing in renewable resources, where there is regulatory support.  

In the absence of comprehensive climate change legislation, the Federal EPA has taken action to regulate CO 2 emissions under the existing provisions of the CAA.  Such actions are being legally challenged by numerous parties and final regulatory outcomes remain uncertain.  For additional information regarding the Federal EPA action taken to regulate CO 2 emissions, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings entitled Environmental Issues Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy.

Our fossil fuel-fired generating units are large sources of CO 2 emissions.  If substantial CO 2 emission reductions are required, there will be significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs which would hasten the ultimate retirement of older, less-efficient, coal-fired units.  To the extent we install additional controls on our generation plants to limit CO 2 emissions and receive regulatory approvals to increase our rates, return on capital investment would have a positive effect on future earnings.  Prudently incurred capital investments made by our subsidiaries in rate-regulated jurisdictions to comply with legal requirements and benefit customers are generally included in rate base for recovery and earn a return on investment.  We would expect these principles to apply to investments made to address new environmental requirements.  However, requests for rate increases reflecting these costs can affect us adversely because our regulators could limit the amount or timing of increased costs that we would recover through higher rates. For our sales of energy into the markets, however, there is no such recovery mechanism.

Renewable Sources of Energy

Some of the states we serve have established mandatory or voluntary programs to increase the use of energy efficiency, alternative energy, or renewable energy sources (Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia).  During 2014 in support of our goals or requirements, our operating companies procured rights to an additional 199 MW of wind power and at the end of 2014 our operating companies had long-term contracts for 2,183 MW of wind and 10 MW of solar power. In addition, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has approved I&M's proposal for a self-build Clean Energy Solar Pilot Project (15.7 MW).  When the additional projects under construction and/or pending regulatory approval are added and netted against one wind contract that is expiring at the end of 2015, the total renewable portfolio will be 2,715 MW to serve our regulated operating company customers.  We actively manage our compliance position and are on pace to meet the relevant requirements or benchmarks in each applicable jurisdiction.


11



End Use Energy Efficiency

Beginning in 2008, AEP ramped up efforts to reduce energy consumption and peak demand through the introduction of additional energy efficiency and demand response programs.  These programs, commonly and collectively referred to as demand side management, were implemented in jurisdictions where appropriate cost recovery was available.  Since that time, AEP operating companies have implemented over 100 programs across the AEP service territory and in most of the states we serve.  For the period 2008 through 2014, these programs have reduced annual consumption by over 5.2 million megawatt hours and peak demand by over 1,500 MW.  To achieve these levels, AEP operating companies invested approximately $700 million during the same period.   These results are preliminary and subject to independent third party evaluation and verification of savings, as required.

Energy efficiency and demand reduction programs have received regulatory support in most of the states we serve, and appropriate cost recovery will be essential for us to continue and expand these consumer offerings. Appropriate recovery of program costs, lost revenues, and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return ensures that energy efficiency programs are considered equally with supply side investments.  Going forward, we will work closely with regulators to ensure that plans are in place to meet specific regulatory and legislative energy efficiency and/or demand reduction targets present in the respective jurisdictions.

Corporate Governance

In response to environmental issues and in connection with its assessment of our strategic plan, our Board of Directors continually reviews the risks posed by our actions.  The Board of Directors is informed of any new material issues, including changes to environmental regulations and proposed regulation or legislation that could affect the Company.  The Board’s Committee on Directors and Corporate Governance oversees the Company’s annual Corporate Accountability Report, which includes information about the Company’s environmental, financial and social performance.

Other Environmental Issues and Matters

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 imposes costs for environmental remediation upon owners and previous owners of sites, as well as transporters and generators of hazardous material disposed of at such sites.  See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, under the heading entitled The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) and State Remediation for further information.


12



Environmental Investments

Investments related to improving AEP System plants’ environmental performance and compliance with air and water quality standards during 2012 , 2013 and 2014 and the current estimates for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 are shown below, in each case including debt AFUDC.  Estimated construction expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends and the ability to access capital.  AEP expects to make substantial investments in future years in addition to the amounts set forth below in connection with the modification and addition of facilities at generation plants for environmental quality controls.  Such future investments are needed in order to comply with air and water quality standards that have been adopted and have deadlines for compliance after 2014 or have been proposed and may be adopted.  Future investments could be significantly greater if emissions reduction requirements are accelerated or otherwise become more onerous or if CO 2 becomes regulated at existing facilities.  The cost of complying with applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules is expected to be material to the AEP System.  We typically recover costs of complying with environmental standards from customers through rates in regulated jurisdictions.  For our sales of energy into the markets, however, there is no such recovery mechanism.  Failure to recover these costs could reduce our future net income and cash flows and possibly harm our financial condition.  See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading entitled Environmental Issues and Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, for more information regarding environmental expenditures in general.
Historical and Projected Environmental Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
 
Actual
 
Actual
 
Actual
 
Estimate
 
Estimate
 
Estimate
 
 
(in thousands)
Total AEP (a)
 
$
241,000

 
$
424,200

 
$
539,800

 
$
661,000

 
$
401,000

 
$
531,000

APCo
 
52,400

 
44,800

 
31,300

 
70,000

 
53,000

 
151,000

I&M
 
30,000

 
28,300

 
51,400

 
40,000

 
49,000

 
84,000

OPCo (b)
 
70,300

 
129,300

 

 

 

 

PSO
 
26,300

 
56,100

 
72,100

 
85,000

 
49,000

 
9,000

SWEPCo
 
24,200

 
135,700

 
225,300

 
316,000

 
86,000

 
66,000

 
(a)
Includes expenditures of the subsidiaries shown and other subsidiaries not shown. The figures reflect construction expenditures, not investments in subsidiary companies.  Excludes discontinued operations.
(b)
OPCo transferred all of its generation assets on December 31, 2013.



13



BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Our reportable segments and their related business activities are outlined below.   See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements entitled Business Segments, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, for additional information on our operating segments. 

Vertically Integrated Utilities

Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.

Transmission and Distribution Utilities

Transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCo, TCC and TNC.
OPCo purchases energy and capacity to serve remaining generation service customers.

AEP Transmission Holdco

Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in our wholly-owned transmission only subsidiaries and transmission only joint ventures. These investments have PUCT-approved or FERC-approved returns on equity.

Generation & Marketing

Nonregulated generation in ERCOT and PJM.
Marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, PJM and MISO.

AEP River Operations

Commercial barging operations that transport liquid, coal and dry bulk commodities primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi Rivers.

VERTICALLY INTEGRATED UTILITIES

GENERAL

AEP’s vertically integrated utility operations are engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.  AEPSC, as agent for AEP’s public utility subsidiaries, performs marketing, generation dispatch, fuel procurement and power-related risk management and trading activities on behalf of each of these subsidiaries.

ELECTRIC GENERATION

Facilities and Coordination

As of December 31, 2014 , AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries owned or leased approximately 26,900 MW of domestic generation.  See Item 2 – Properties for more information regarding the generation capacity of vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries.


14



Counterparty Risk Management

Counterparties and exchanges may require cash or cash related instruments to be deposited on transactions as margin against open positions.  As of December 31, 2014 , counterparties posted approximately $9 million in cash, cash equivalents or letters of credit with AEPSC for the benefit of AEP’s public utility subsidiaries (while, as of that date, AEP’s public utility subsidiaries posted approximately   $53 million with counterparties and exchanges).  Since open trading contracts are valued based on market prices of various commodities, exposures change daily.  See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, under the heading entitled Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information.

Fuel Supply

The 2012 and 2013 results include fuel used and transported by OPCo, a utility subsidiary that is not part of the Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.  OPCo’s results appear here because it retained its generation until year-end 2013 at which point all of its generation was transferred to AGR which transferred portions to APCo and KPCo.

The table shows the sources of fuel used by the Vertically Integrated Utilities:
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Coal and Lignite
72%
 
75%
 
71%
Nuclear
16%
 
11%
 
11%
Natural Gas
11%
 
13%
 
17%
Hydroelectric and other
1%
 
<1%
 
<1%

A price increase/decrease in one or more fuel sources relative to other fuels may result in the decreased/increased use of other fuels.  AEP’s overall 2014 fossil fuel costs for the Vertically Integrated Utilities were relatively unchanged on a dollar per MMBtu basis from 2013. A slight decline in the cost of coal was offset by an increase in natural gas prices, during the first half of 2014.

Coal and Lignite

AEP’s Vertically Integrated Utilities procure coal and lignite under a combination of purchasing arrangements including long-term contracts, affiliate operations and spot agreements with various producers and coal trading firms.  Coal consumption in 2014 was higher than 2013 due to strong demand in the East during the first half of the year, but coal inventories ended the year at target levels on a system basis.

Management believes that the Vertically Integrated Utilities will be able to secure and transport coal and lignite of adequate quality and in adequate quantities to operate their coal and lignite-fired units.  Through subsidiaries, AEP owns, leases or controls more than 4,990 railcars, approximately 509 barges, 12 towboats, and a coal handling terminal with approximately 18 million tons of annual capacity to move and store coal for use in our generating facilities.  See AEP River Operations for a discussion of AEP’s for-profit liquid, coal and other dry-bulk commodity transportation operations that are not part of this segment.

Spot market prices for coal decreased throughout 2014.  The decreased spot coal prices during the year can be attributed to weak European coal demand, and relatively inexpensive natural gas, in the second half of 2014.  Approximately half of the coal purchased by AEP is procured through term contracts.  As those contracts expire, they are replaced with contracts at current market prices.  The price impact of this process is reflected in subsequent periods.  The price paid for coal delivered in 2014 decreased from the prior year primarily due to a decrease in spot coal prices and heavier reliance on shorter term contracts.


15



The following table shows the amount of coal and lignite delivered to the Vertically Integrated Utilities plants during the past three years and the average delivered price of coal purchased by the Vertically Integrated Utilities:
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Total coal delivered to the plants (thousands of tons)
41,001

 
51,057

 
60,054

Average cost per ton of coal delivered
$
46.65

 
$
51.31

 
$
49.22


The coal supplies at the Vertically Integrated Utilities plants vary from time to time depending on various factors, including, but not limited to, demand for electric power, unit outages, transportation infrastructure limitations, space limitations, plant coal consumption rates, availability of acceptable coals, labor issues and weather conditions, which may interrupt production or deliveries. As of December 31, 2014, the Vertically Integrated Utilities coal inventory was approximately 31 days of full load burn.

Natural Gas

The Vertically Integrated Utilities consumed over 96 billion cubic feet of natural gas during 2014 for generating power. This represents a decrease of 15% from 2013; 96.1 billion cubic feet in 2014 as compared to 112.4 billion cubic feet in 2013, excluding OPCo usage.  While AEP’s natural gas-fired generating capacity has increased over the past several years with the addition of the Stall and Dresden units, the implementation of the SPP Market and change in the dispatch of AEP’s natural gas fleet resulted in a decreased natural gas-fired generation.  Despite the availability of natural gas due to the increased shale supply, the U.S. pipeline infrastructure remains a limiting factor in the expansion of natural gas-fired generation.  Several of AEP’s natural gas-fired power plants are connected to at least two pipelines, however, which allow greater access to competitive supplies and improves delivery reliability. A portfolio of term, monthly, seasonal firm and daily peaking purchase and transportation agreements (that are entered into on a competitive basis and based on market prices) supplies natural gas requirements for each plant, as appropriate.

The following table shows the amount of natural gas delivered to the Vertically Integrated Utilities plants during the past three years and the average delivered price of natural gas purchased by the Vertically Integrated Utilities. Results for 2013 and 2012 include natural gas delivered to OPCo, while results for 2014 do not.
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Total natural gas delivered to the plants (billion cubic feet)
96.1

 
158.3

 
220.0

Average price per MMBtu of purchased natural gas
$
4.70

 
$
4.01

 
$
3.01


Nuclear

I&M has made commitments to meet the current nuclear fuel requirements of the Cook Plant.  I&M has made and will make purchases of uranium in various forms in the spot, short-term and mid-term markets.  I&M also continues to lease a portion of its nuclear fuel.

For purposes of the storage of high-level radioactive waste in the form of spent nuclear fuel, I&M completed modifications to its spent nuclear fuel storage pool more than 10 years ago.  I&M entered into an agreement to provide for onsite dry cask storage of spent nuclear fuel to permit normal operations to continue.  I&M is scheduled to conduct further dry cask loading and storage projects on an ongoing periodic basis.  I&M completed its initial loading of spent nuclear fuel into the dry casks in 2012, which consisted of 12 casks (32 spent nuclear fuel assemblies contained within each).  The second loading of spent nuclear fuel into dry casks is expected to be completed in 2015.


16



Nuclear Waste and Decommissioning

As the owner of the Cook Plant, I&M has a significant future financial commitment to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and decommission and decontaminate the plant safely.  The cost to decommission a nuclear plant is affected by NRC regulations and the spent nuclear fuel disposal program.  The most recent decommissioning cost study was completed in 2012.  In it, the estimated cost of decommissioning and disposal of low-level radioactive waste for the Cook Plant ranged from $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion in 2012 non-discounted dollars.  As of December 31, 2014 , the total decommissioning trust fund balance for the Cook Plant was approximately $1.8 billion. The balance of funds available to decommission Cook Plant will differ based on contributions and investment returns.  The ultimate cost of retiring the Cook Plant may be materially different from estimates and funding targets as a result of the:

Type of decommissioning plan selected.
Escalation of various cost elements (including, but not limited to, general inflation and the cost of energy).
Further development of regulatory requirements governing decommissioning.
Technology available at the time of decommissioning differing significantly from that assumed in studies.
Availability of nuclear waste disposal facilities.
Availability of a United States Department of Energy facility for permanent storage of spent nuclear fuel.

Accordingly, management is unable to provide assurance that the ultimate cost of decommissioning the Cook Plant will not be significantly different than current projections.  We will seek recovery from customers through our regulated rates if actual decommissioning costs exceed our projections.  See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies under the heading Nuclear Contingencies, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, for information with respect to nuclear waste and decommissioning.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste

The Low-Level Waste Policy Act of 1980 mandates that the responsibility for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste rests with the individual states.  Low-level radioactive waste consists largely of ordinary refuse and other items that have come in contact with radioactive materials.  Michigan does not currently have a disposal site for such waste available.  I&M cannot predict when such a site may be available. However the states of Utah and Texas have licensed low level radioactive waste disposal sites which currently accept low level radioactive waste from Michigan waste generators.  There is currently no set date limiting I&M’s access to either of these facilities.  The Cook Plant has a facility onsite designed specifically for the storage of low level radioactive waste.  In the event that low level radioactive waste disposal facility access becomes unavailable, then low level radioactive waste can be stored onsite at this facility.

Certain Power Agreements

I&M

The Unit Power Agreement between AEGCo and I&M, dated March 31, 1982, provides for the sale by AEGCo to I&M of all the capacity (and the energy associated therewith) available to AEGCo at the Rockport Plant.  Whether or not power is available from AEGCo, I&M is obligated to pay a demand charge for the right to receive such power (and an energy charge for any associated energy taken by I&M).  The agreement will continue in effect until the last of the lease terms of Unit 2 of the Rockport Plant has expired (currently December 2022) unless extended in specified circumstances.

Pursuant to an assignment between I&M and KPCo, and a unit power agreement between AEGCo and KPCo, AEGCo sells KPCo 30% of the capacity (and the energy associated therewith) available to AEGCo from both units of the Rockport Plant.  KPCo has agreed to pay to AEGCo the amounts that I&M would have paid AEGCo under the terms of the Unit Power Agreement between AEGCo and I&M for such entitlement.  The KPCo unit power agreement expires in December 2022.


17



OVEC

AEP and several nonaffiliated utility companies jointly own OVEC.  The aggregate equity participation of AEP in OVEC is 43.47%.  Until 2001, OVEC supplied from its generation capacity the power requirements of a uranium enrichment plant near Portsmouth, Ohio owned by the United States Department of Energy.  The sponsoring companies are entitled to receive and are obligated to pay for all OVEC capacity (approximately 2,200 MW) in proportion to their respective power participation ratios.  The aggregate power participation ratio of APCo, I&M and OPCo is 43.47%.  The proceeds from the sale of power by OVEC are designed to be sufficient for OVEC to meet its operating expenses and fixed costs and to provide a return on its equity capital.  The Inter-Company Power Agreement, which defines the rights of the owners and sets the power participation ratio of each, was extended by the owners in 2011 from the termination date of March 2026 until June 2040.  AEP and the other owners have authorized environmental investments related to their ownership interests.  OVEC financed capital expenditures totaling $1.3 billion in connection with the engineering and construction of flue gas desulfurization projects and the associated scrubber waste disposal landfills at its two generation plants through debt issuances, including tax-advantaged debt issuances.  Both OVEC generation plants are operating with the new environmental controls in service.  OPCo attempted to assign its rights and obligations under the Inter-Company Power Agreement to an affiliate as part of its transfer of its generation assets and liabilities in keeping with corporate separation required by Ohio law.  OPCo failed to obtain the consent to assignment from the other owners of OVEC and therefore filed a request with the PUCO seeking authorization to maintain its ownership of OVEC. In December 2013, the PUCO approved OPCo’s request, subject to the condition that energy from the OVEC entitlements are sold into the day-ahead or real-time PJM energy markets, or on a forward basis through a bilateral arrangemen t. OPCo has filed an application with the PUCO to approve a purchased power agreement (PPA) rider that would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based purchase power agreement.  The PPA would initially be based upon OPCo's contractual entitlement under the Inter-Company Agreement which is approximately 20% of OVEC's capacity .

ELECTRIC DELIVERY

General

Other than AEGCo, AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries own and operate transmission and distribution lines and other facilities to deliver electric power.  See Item 2 – Properties for more information regarding the transmission and distribution lines.  Most of the transmission and distribution services are sold to retail customers of AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries in their service territories.  These sales are made at rates approved by the state utility commissions of the states in which they operate, and in some instances, approved by the FERC.  See Item 1 – Vertically Integrated Utilities – Regulation – Rates.  The FERC regulates and approves the rates for both wholesale transmission transactions and wholesale generation contracts.  See Item 1 – Vertically Integrated Utilities – Regulation – FERC.  As discussed below, some transmission services also are separately sold to non-affiliated companies.

Other than AEGCo, AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries hold franchises or other rights to provide electric service in various municipalities and regions in their service areas.  In some cases, these franchises provide the utility with the exclusive right to provide electric service.  These franchises have varying provisions and expiration dates.  In general, the operating companies consider their franchises to be adequate for the conduct of their business.  For a discussion of competition in the sale of power, see Item 1 – Vertically Integrated Utilities – Competition.

The use and the recovery of costs associated with the transmission assets of the AEP vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries are subject to the rules, principles, protocols and agreements in place with PJM, SPP and ERCOT, and as approved by the FERC.


18



Transmission Agreement

APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo and WPCo own and operate transmission facilities that are used to provide transmission service under the PJM OATT and are parties to the TA.  OPCo, a subsidiary in our Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment, is also a party to the TA.  The TA defines how the parties to the agreement share the revenues associated with their transmission facilities and the costs of transmission service provided by PJM.  The TA has been approved by the FERC.

The following table shows the net charges allocated among the certain parties to the TA during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
84,667

 
$
40,609

 
$
20,264

I&M
 
39,707

 
19,947

 
5,689


TCA, OATT, and ERCOT Protocols

PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC are parties to the TCA.  Under the TCA, a coordinating committee is charged with the responsibility of (a) overseeing the coordinated planning of the transmission facilities of the parties to the agreement, including the performance of transmission planning studies, (b) the interaction of such subsidiaries with independent system operators and other regional bodies interested in transmission planning and (c) compliance with the terms of the OATT filed with the FERC and the rules of the FERC relating to such tariff.  Pursuant to the TCA, AEPSC has responsibility for monitoring the reliability of their transmission systems and administering the OATT on behalf of the other parties to the agreement.  The TCA also provides for the allocation among the parties of revenues collected for transmission and ancillary services provided under the OATT.  These allocations have been determined by the FERC-approved OATT for the SPP.

The following table shows the net (credits) or charges allocated pursuant to the TCA and SPP OATT protocols as described above for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
PSO
$
14,100

 
$
14,700

 
$
12,300

SWEPCo
(14,100
)
 
(14,700
)
 
(12,300
)

Transmission Services for Non-Affiliates

In addition to providing transmission services in connection with their own power sales, AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries through RTOs also provide transmission services for non-affiliated companies.  See Item 1 – Vertically Integrated Utilities – Electric Transmission and Distribution – Regional Transmission Organizations, below.  Transmission of electric power by AEP’s public utility subsidiaries is regulated by the FERC.


19



Coordination of East and West Zone Transmission

AEP’s System Transmission Integration Agreement was terminated effective June 1, 2014. It provided for the integration and coordination of the planning, operation and maintenance of the transmission facilities of AEP East Companies and AEP West Companies.  The System Transmission Integration Agreement functioned as an umbrella agreement in addition to the TA and the TCA.  AEP’s System Transmission Integration Agreement contained two service schedules that governed:

The allocation of transmission costs and revenues.
The allocation of third-party transmission costs and revenues and System dispatch costs.

The System Transmission Integration Agreement contemplated that additional service schedules may be added as circumstances warrant.

Regional Transmission Organizations

AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo and WPCo are members of PJM, and PSO and SWEPCo are members of the SPP (both FERC-approved RTOs).  RTOs operate, plan and control utility transmission assets in a manner designed to provide open access to such assets in a way that prevents discrimination between participants owning transmission assets and those that do not.

REGULATION

General

AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries’ retail rates and certain other matters are subject to traditional cost-based regulation by the state utility commissions.  AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries are also subject to regulation by the FERC under the Federal Power Act with respect to wholesale power and transmission service transactions.  I&M is subject to regulation by the NRC under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, with respect to the operation of the Cook Plant.  AEP and its vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries are also subject to the regulatory provisions of EPACT, much of which is administered by the FERC.

Rates

Historically, state utility commissions have established electric service rates on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow a utility an opportunity to recover its cost of providing service and to earn a reasonable return on its investment used in providing that service.  A utility’s cost of service generally reflects its operating expenses, including operation and maintenance expense, depreciation expense and taxes.  State utility commissions periodically adjust rates pursuant to a review of (a) a utility’s adjusted revenues and expenses during a defined test period and (b) such utility’s level of investment.  Absent a legal limitation, such as a law limiting the frequency of rate changes or capping rates for a period of time, a state utility commission can review and change rates on its own initiative.  Some states may initiate reviews at the request of a utility, customer, governmental or other representative of a group of customers.  Such parties may, however, agree with one another not to request reviews of or changes to rates for a specified period of time.

Public utilities have traditionally financed capital investments until the new asset is placed in service.  Provided the asset was found to be a prudent investment, it was then added to rate base and entitled to a return through rate recovery.  Given long lead times in construction, the high costs of plant and equipment and volatile capital markets, we are actively pursuing strategies to accelerate rate recognition of investments and cash flow.  AEP representatives continue to engage our state commissioners and legislators on alternative ratemaking options to reduce regulatory lag and enhance certainty in the process.  These options include pre-approvals, a return on construction work in progress, rider/trackers, formula rates and the inclusion of future test-year projections into rates.


20



The rates of AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries are generally based on the cost of providing traditional bundled electric service (i.e., generation, transmission and distribution service).  Historically, the state regulatory frameworks in the service area of the AEP vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries reflected specified fuel costs as part of bundled (or, more recently, unbundled) rates or incorporated fuel adjustment clauses in a utility’s rates and tariffs.  Fuel adjustment clauses permit periodic adjustments to fuel cost recovery from customers and therefore provide protection against exposure to fuel cost changes.

The following state-by-state analysis summarizes the regulatory environment of certain major jurisdictions in which AEP operates.  Several public utility subsidiaries operate in more than one jurisdiction.  See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, entitled Rate Matters, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, for more information regarding pending rate matters.

Indiana

I&M provides retail electric service in Indiana at bundled rates approved by the IURC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis.  Indiana provides for timely fuel and purchased power cost recovery through a fuel cost recovery mechanism.

Oklahoma

PSO provides retail electric service in Oklahoma at bundled rates approved by the OCC.  PSO’s rates are set on a cost-of-service basis.  Fuel and purchased energy costs above or below the amount included in base rates are recovered or refunded by applying fuel adjustment and other factors to retail kilowatt-hour sales.  The factors are generally adjusted annually and are based upon forecasted fuel and purchased energy costs.  Over or under collections of fuel and purchased energy costs for prior periods are returned to or recovered from customers in the year following when new annual factors are established.

Virginia

APCo currently provides retail electric service in Virginia at unbundled rates approved by the Virginia SCC.  Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through a fuel adjustment clause.  Transmission services are provided at OATT rates based on rates established by the FERC.  In addition to base rates and fuel cost recovery, APCo is permitted to recover a variety of costs through rate adjustment clauses.

West Virginia

APCo and WPCo provide retail electric service at bundled rates approved by the WVPSC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis.  West Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through an expanded net energy cost which trues-up to actual expenses.

FERC

Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC regulates rates for interstate power sales at wholesale, transmission of electric power, accounting and other matters, including construction and operation of hydroelectric projects.  The FERC regulations require AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries to provide open access transmission service at FERC-approved rates.  The FERC also regulates unbundled transmission service to retail customers.  The FERC also regulates the sale of power for resale in interstate commerce by (a) approving contracts for wholesale sales to municipal and cooperative utilities and (b) granting authority to public utilities to sell power at wholesale at market-based rates upon a showing that the seller lacks the ability to improperly influence market prices.  AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries have market-based rate authority from the FERC, under which much of their wholesale marketing activity takes place.  The FERC requires each public utility that owns or controls interstate transmission facilities to, directly or through an RTO, to file an open access network and point-to-point transmission tariff that offers services comparable to the utility’s own uses of its transmission system.  The FERC also requires all

21



transmitting utilities, directly or through an RTO, to establish an Open Access Same-time Information System, which electronically posts transmission information such as available capacity and prices, and requires utilities to comply with Standards of Conduct that prohibit utilities’ transmission employees from providing non-public transmission information to the utility’s marketing employees.

The FERC oversees RTOs, entities created to operate, plan and control utility transmission assets.  Order 2000 also prescribes certain characteristics and functions of acceptable RTO proposals.  AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo and WPCo are members of PJM.  PSO and SWEPCo are members of SPP.

The FERC has jurisdiction over the issuances of securities of most of our public utility subsidiaries, the acquisition of securities of utilities, the acquisition or sale of certain utility assets and mergers with another electric utility or holding company.  In addition, both the FERC and state regulators are permitted to review the books and records of any company within a holding company system.  EPACT gives the FERC increased utility merger oversight.

COMPETITION

The vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries of AEP, like the electric industry generally, face competition in the sale of available power on a wholesale basis, primarily to other public utilities and power marketers.  The Energy Policy Act of 1992 was designed, among other things, to foster competition in the wholesale market by creating a generation market with fewer barriers to entry and mandating that all generators have equal access to transmission services.  As a result, there are more generators able to participate in this market.  The principal factors in competing for wholesale sales are price (including fuel costs), availability of capacity and power and reliability of service.

AEP’s vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries also compete with self-generation and with distributors of other energy sources, such as natural gas, fuel oil and coal, within their service areas.  The primary factors in such competition are price, reliability of service and the capability of customers to utilize sources of energy other than electric power.  With respect to competing generators and self-generation, the public utility subsidiaries of AEP believe that they generally maintain a competitive position.  With respect to alternative sources of energy, the vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries of AEP believe that the reliability of their service and the limited ability of customers to substitute other cost-effective sources for electric power place them in a favorable competitive position, even though their prices may be higher than the costs of some other sources of energy.

Significant changes in the global economy have led to increased price competition for industrial customers in the United States, including those served by the AEP System.  Some of these industrial customers have requested price reductions from their suppliers of electric power.  In addition, industrial customers that are downsizing or reorganizing often close a facility based upon its costs, which may include, among other things, the cost of electric power.  The vertically integrated public utility subsidiaries of AEP cooperate with such customers to meet their business needs through, for example, providing various off-peak or interruptible supply options pursuant to tariffs filed with, and approved by, the various state commissions.  Occasionally, these rates are negotiated with the customer, and then filed with the state commissions for approval.

SEASONALITY

The sale of electric power is generally a seasonal business.  In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the hot summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time.  In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter.  The pattern of this fluctuation may change due to the nature and location of AEP’s facilities and the terms of power sale contracts into which AEP enters.  In addition, AEP has historically sold less power, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are milder.  Unusually mild weather in the future could diminish AEP’s results of operations and may impact its financial condition.  Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase AEP’s results of operations.

22



TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES

GENERAL

This segment consists of the transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCo, TCC and TNC. OPCo is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 1,466,000 retail customers in Ohio.  TCC is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 817,000 retail customers through REPs in southern Texas. TNC is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric power to approximately 189,000 retail customers through REPs in west and central Texas.

AEP’s transmission and distribution utility subsidiaries own and operate transmission and distribution lines and other facilities to deliver electric power.  See Item 2 – Properties for more information regarding the transmission and distribution lines.  Most of the transmission and distribution services are sold to retail customers of AEP’s transmission and distribution utility subsidiaries in their service territories.  These sales are made at rates approved by the PUCT for TCC and TNC and by the PUCO and the FERC for OPCo.  The FERC regulates and approves the rates for wholesale transmission transactions.  As discussed below, some transmission services also are separately sold to non-affiliated companies.

AEP’s transmission and distribution utility subsidiaries hold franchises or other rights to provide electric service in various municipalities and regions in their service areas.  In some cases, these franchises provide the utility with the exclusive right to provide electric service.  These franchises have varying provisions and expiration dates.  In general, the operating companies consider their franchises to be adequate for the conduct of their business.

The use and the recovery of costs associated with the transmission assets of the AEP transmission and distribution utility subsidiaries are subject to the rules, protocols and agreements in place with PJM and ERCOT, and as approved by the FERC.  In addition to providing transmission services in connection with power sales in their service areas, AEP’s transmission and distribution utility subsidiaries through RTOs also provide transmission services for non-affiliated companies.

Transmission Agreement

OPCo, together with APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo and WPCo, is a party to the TA.  The TA defines how the parties to the agreement share the cost of their transmission facilities.  The TA has been approved by the FERC.  OPCo’s net charges allocated to it under the TA during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $17 million, $8.9 million and $6.1 million, respectively.

Regional Transmission Organizations

OPCo is a member of PJM, a FERC-approved RTO.  RTOs operate, plan and control utility transmission assets in a manner designed to provide open access to such assets in a way that prevents discrimination between participants owning transmission assets and those that do not.  TCC and TNC are members of ERCOT.

REGULATION

OPCo provides distribution and transmission services to retail customers within its service territory at cost-based rates approved by the PUCO or by the FERC.  TCC and TNC provide transmission and distribution service on a cost-of-service basis at rates approved by the PUCT and wholesale transmission service under tariffs approved by the FERC consistent with PUCT rules.  Transmission and distribution rates are established on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow a utility an opportunity to recover its cost of providing service and to earn a reasonable return on its investment used in providing that service.  The cost of service generally reflects operating expenses, including operation and maintenance expense, depreciation expense and taxes.  Utility commissions periodically adjust rates pursuant to a review of (a) a utility’s adjusted revenues and expenses during a defined test period and (b) such utility’s level of investment.


23



FERC

Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC regulates rates for transmission of electric power, accounting and other matters.  The FERC regulations require AEP to provide open access transmission service at FERC-approved rates.  The FERC also regulates unbundled transmission service to retail customers.  The FERC requires each public utility that owns or controls interstate transmission facilities to, directly or through an RTO, file an open access network and point-to-point transmission tariff that offers services comparable to the utility’s own uses of its transmission system.  The FERC also requires all transmitting utilities, directly or through an RTO, to establish an Open Access Same-time Information System, which electronically posts transmission information such as available capacity and prices, and requires utilities to comply with Standards of Conduct that prohibit utilities’ transmission employees from providing non-public transmission information to the utility’s marketing employees. In addition, both the FERC and state regulators are permitted to review the books and records of any company within a holding company system.  EPACT gives the FERC increased utility merger oversight.

SEASONALITY

The delivery of electric power is generally a seasonal business.  In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the hot summer months.  In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter months.  The pattern of this fluctuation may change due to the nature and location of AEP’s transmission and distribution facilities.  In addition, AEP transmission and distribution has historically delivered less power, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are milder.  Unusually mild weather in the future could diminish AEP transmission and distribution’s results of operations and may impact its financial condition.  Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase AEP transmission and distribution’s results of operations.

GENERATION & MARKETING

GENERAL

Our Generation & Marketing segment subsidiaries consist of competitive nonutility generating assets, a wholesale energy trading and marketing business and a retail supply and energy management business.  The largest subsidiary in our Generation & Marketing segment is AGR.  On December 31, 2013, AGR acquired the generation assets and related liabilities at net book value of OPCo in a series of transactions approved by the PUCO and the FERC.  AGR transferred a portion of the generation assets and liabilities at net book value that it received to APCo and KPCo, and, in 2015 to WPCo.  As a result of these transactions, AGR owns 9,159 MW of generating capacity, with rights to an additional 1,186 MW pursuant to a unit power agreement (see below).  Other subsidiaries in this segment own or have the right to receive power from additional generation assets.  See Item 2 – Properties for more information regarding the generation assets of the Generation & Marketing segment. AGR is a competitive generation subsidiary.

With respect to our wholesale energy trading and marketing business, we enter into short and long-term transactions to buy or sell capacity, energy and ancillary services primarily in ERCOT, MISO and PJM.  We sell power into the market and engage in power, natural gas, coal and emissions allowances risk management and trading activities.  

These activities primarily involve the purchase and sale of electricity (and to a lesser extent, natural gas, coal and emissions allowances) under forward contracts at fixed and variable prices.  These contracts include physical transactions, exchange-traded futures, and to a lesser extent, over-the-counter swaps and options.  The majority of forward contracts are typically settled by entering into offsetting contracts.  These transactions are executed with numerous counterparties or on exchanges.

With respect to our retail supply and energy management business, our subsidiary AEP Energy is a retail energy supplier that supplies electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers.  AEP Energy provides an array of energy solutions and is operating in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio and Washington, D.C.  AEP Energy also provides demand-side management solutions nationwide.  AEP Energy had approximately 240,000 customer accounts as of December 31, 2014 .

24



REGULATION

AGR is a public utility under the Federal Power Act, and is subject to FERC’s exclusive ratemaking jurisdiction over wholesale sales of electricity and the transmission of electricity in interstate commerce. Under the Federal Power Act, FERC has the authority to grant or deny market-based rates for sales of energy, capacity and ancillary services to ensure that such sales are just and reasonable.  FERC granted AGR market-based rate authority in December 2013.  FERC’s jurisdiction over ratemaking also includes the authority to suspend the market-based rates of utilities (including AGR, which is a public utility as defined by the FERC) and set cost-based rates if FERC subsequently determines that such utility can exercise market power, create barriers to entry or engage in abusive affiliate transactions.  As a condition to the order granting AGR market-based rate authority, every three years AGR is required to file a market power update to show that it continues to meet FERC’s standards with respect to generation market power and other criteria used to evaluate whether it continues to qualify for market-based rates.  Other matters subject to FERC jurisdiction include, but are not limited to, review of mergers; and dispositions of jurisdictional facilities and acquisitions of securities of another public utility or an existing operational generating facility.

Specific operations of AGR are also subject to the jurisdiction of various other Federal, state, regional and local agencies, including Federal and state environmental protection agencies.  We are also regulated by the PUCT for transactions inside ERCOT.  Additionally, AGR is subject to mandatory reliability standards promulgated by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, with the approval of FERC. 

COMPETITION

The generation and marketing subsidiaries of AEP face competition for the sale of available power, capacity and ancillary services.  The principal factors impacting us are electricity and fuel prices, new market entrants, construction or retirement of generating assets by others and technological advances in power generation. It is possible that changes in regulatory policies or advances in newer technologies for batteries or energy storage, fuel cells, microturbines, windmills and photovoltaic solar cells will reduce costs of new technology to levels that are equal to or below that of most central station electricity production.  Our ability to maintain relatively low cost, efficient and reliable operations is a significant determinate of our competitiveness.

With over 70% of our generation fleet fueled by coal, our overall competitive position is impacted by the price of natural gas relative to coal.  While higher relative natural gas prices generally favor our competitive position, lower relative natural gas prices will favor our competitors that have a higher concentration of natural gas fueled generation.  Other factors impacting our competitiveness include environmental regulation, transmission congestion or transportation constraints at or near our generation facilities, inoperability or inefficiencies, outages and deactivations and retirements at our generation facilities.

SEASONALITY

The sale of electric power is generally a seasonal business.  In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the hot summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time.  In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter months.  The pattern of this fluctuation may change.


25



Counterparty Risk Management

Counterparties and exchanges may require cash or cash related instruments to be deposited on these transactions as margin against open positions.  As of December 31, 2014 , counterparties posted approximately $26 million in cash, cash equivalents or letters of credit with AEP for the benefit of AEP’s generation and marketing subsidiaries (while, as of that date, AEP’s generation and marketing subsidiaries posted approximately   $220 million with counterparties and exchanges).  Since open trading contracts are valued based on market prices of various commodities, exposures change daily.  See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in the 2014 Annual Reports, under the heading entitled Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information.

Fuel Supply

The table shows the sources of fossil fuel used, on a heat basis, by AGR:
 
2014
Coal
 88%
Natural Gas
   12%
Fuel Oil and other
< 1%
A price increase/decrease in one or more fuel sources relative to other fuels may result in the decreased/increased use of other fuels.

Coal and Consumables
AGR procures coal and consumables needed to burn the coal under a combination of purchasing arrangements including long-term and spot contracts with various producers and coal trading firms.  As contracts expire, they are replaced, as needed, with contracts at market prices. Coal and consumable inventories remain adequate to meet generation requirements.
Management believes that AGR will be able to secure and transport coal and consumables of adequate quality and in adequate quantities to operate their coal fired units.  AGR, through contracts, ownership and leases has the ability to adequately move and store coal and consumables for use in our generating facilities. AGR plants consumed 16.1 million tons of coal in 2014.

The coal supplies at AGR plants vary from time to time depending on various factors, including, but not limited to, demand for electric power, unit outages, transportation infrastructure limitations, space limitations, plant coal consumption rates, coal quality, availability of acceptable coals, labor issues and weather conditions, which may interrupt production or deliveries. As of December 31, 2014, AGR’s coal inventory was adequate to meet the generation demand of the coal fleet.

Natural Gas

Despite the availability of natural gas due to the increased shale supply, the U.S. pipeline infrastructure remains a limiting factor in the expansion of natural gas-fired generation.  A portfolio of term, monthly, seasonal firm and daily peaking purchase and transportation agreements (that are entered into on a competitive basis and based on market prices) supplies natural gas requirements for each plant, as appropriate. AGR plants consumed 50 billion cubic feet of natural gas in 2014, an increase of approximately 9% from 2013.


26



Certain Power Agreements

AEGCo

The Unit Power Agreement between AEGCo and AGR (assigned from OPCo) dated March 15, 2007, provides for the sale by AEGCo to AGR of all the capacity and associated unit contingent energy and ancillary services available to AGR from the Lawrenceburg Plant, a 1,186 MW natural gas-fired unit owned by AEGCo.  AGR is obligated to pay a capacity charge (whether or not power is available from the Lawrenceburg Plant), and the fuel, operating and maintenance charges associated with the energy dispatched by AGR, and to reimburse AEGCo for other costs associated with the operation and ownership of the Lawrenceburg Plant.  The agreement will continue in effect until December 31, 2017 unless extended.

OPCo

Pursuant to a Power Supply Agreement (PSA) between AGR and OPCo, AGR supplies capacity for OPCo’s switched and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015.  AGR also supplied the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that was not acquired through auctions from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 under the PSA.

Other

As of December 31, 2014 , the assets utilized in this segment included approximately 310 MW of company-owned domestic wind power facilities, 177 MW of domestic wind power from long-term purchase power agreements and 355 MW of coal-fired capacity which was obtained through an agreement effective through 2027 that transfers TNC’s interest in the Oklaunion power station to AEP Energy Partners, Inc.  The power obtained from the Oklaunion power station is marketed and sold in ERCOT.


AEP TRANSMISSION HOLDCO (AEPTHCO)

GENERAL

AEPTHCo is a holding company for (a) AEP’s transmission joint ventures and (b) AEPTCo, which is the direct holding company for the seven wholly-owned FERC-regulated transmission-only electric utilities (Transcos) listed below, each of which is geographically aligned with our existing utility operating companies.  

AEPTCo TRANSCOS

AEP East Transmission Companies (all located within PJM)

AEP Appalachian Transmission Company, Inc. (APTCo) (covering Virginia)
AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Company, Inc. (IMTCo)
AEP Kentucky Transmission Company, Inc. (KTCo)
AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc. (OHTCo)
AEP West Virginia Transmission Company, Inc. (WVTCo)

AEP West Transmission Companies (all located within SPP)

AEP Oklahoma Transmission Company, Inc. (OKTCo)
AEP Southwestern Transmission Company, Inc. (SWTCo) (covering Louisiana)


27



Transmission development through the Transcos is primarily driven by:

Improvements to local area reliability by upgrading, rebuilding or replacing existing, aging infrastructure.
Construction of new facilities to support customer points of delivery, generation interconnections, new facilities to provide transmission service directed by the RTOs, and new facilities required to maintain grid reliability.
Projects assigned as a result of the regional planning initiatives conducted by PJM and SPP.  PJM and SPP identify the need for transmission in support of regional reliability, congestion reduction and the integration of and retirement of generation facilities.

The Transcos develop, own and operate transmission assets that are physically connected to AEP’s existing system.  They are regulated for rate-making purposes exclusively by the FERC and employ a forward-looking formula rate tariff design.  The Transcos are independent of but overlay AEP’s existing vertically integrated utility operating companies and the transmission operations of OPCo.  APTCo, IMTCo, KTCo, OHTCo, OKTCo and WVTCo have received approvals for formation or did not require state commission approval to operate.  IMTCo, KTCo, OHTCo, OKTCo and WVTCo currently own and operate transmission assets or have assets under construction.  APTCo requires approval from the Virginia SCC on a project by project basis.  The APSC has denied SWTCo's application to operate in Arkansas. An application for regulatory approval for SWTCo is under consideration in Louisiana. As of December 31, 2014, AEPTCo had $1.8 billion of transmission assets in-service with plans to construct approximately $3 billion of additional transmission assets through 2017.


28



JOINT VENTURE INITIATIVES

AEP has established joint ventures with other electric utility companies for the purpose of developing, building, and owning transmission assets that seek to improve reliability and market efficiency and provide transmission access to remote generation sources in North America. 

We are currently participating in the following joint venture initiatives:
Joint Venture Name
 
Location
 
Projected or Actual Completion Date
 
Owners
 (Ownership %)
 
Total Estimated Project Costs at Completion
 
 
AEP's Investment as of December 31, 2014 (h)
 
Approved Return on Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
ETT
 
Texas
 
(a)
 
Berkshire Hathaway
 
$
3,100,000

(a)
 
$
503,910

 
9.96
%
 
 
 
(ERCOT) 
 
 
 
Energy (50%) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (50%) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prairie Wind
 
Kansas
 
2014
 
Westar Energy (50%) 
 
161,500

 
 
18,071

 
12.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Berkshire Hathaway Energy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(25%) (b) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (25%) (b) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pioneer
 
Indiana
 
2018
(c)
Duke Energy (50%) 
 
1,100,000

(c)
 
4,943

 
12.54
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (50%) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RITELine IN
 
Indiana 
 
2026
 
Exelon (12.5%) (d) 
 
400,000

 
 
80

(e)
11.43
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (87.5%) (d) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RITELine IL
 
Illinois 
 
2026
 
Commonwealth 
 
1,200,000

 
 
3

(e)
11.43
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Edison (75%) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exelon (12.5%) (d) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (12.5%) (d) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Transource
 
Missouri
 
2017
 
Great Plains Energy 
 
398,000

(g)
 
26,295

 
11.1
%
(g)
Missouri
 
 
 
 
 
(13.5%) (f) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP (86.5%) (f) 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

(a)
ETT is undertaking multiple projects and the completion dates will vary for those projects. ETT’s investment in completed, current and future projects in ERCOT over the next ten years is expected to be $3.1 billion.  Future projects will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
(b)
AEP owns 25% of Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC (Prairie Wind) through its ownership interest in ETA.  ETA is a 50/50 joint venture with Berkshire Hathaway Energy (formerly known as MidAmerican Energy) and AEP.
(c)
The Pioneer project consists of approximately 286 miles of new 765 kV transmission lines, which is estimated to cost $1.1 billion at completion.  Pioneer is developing the first 66-mile segment jointly with Northern Indiana Public Service Company at a total estimated cost of $350 million.  The projected completion date for the first 66-mile segment is 2018.  The projected completion dates for the remaining segments have not been determined.
(d)
AEP owns 87.5% of RITELine Indiana, LLC (RITELine IN) through its ownership interest in RITELine Transmission Development, LLC (RTD) and AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC (AEPTHCo).  AEP owns 12.5% of RITELine Illinois, LLC (RITELine IL) through its ownership interest in RTD.  RTD is a 50/50 joint venture with Exelon Transmission Company, LLC and AEPTHCo.
(e)
RITELine IN is a consolidated variable interest entity.  RTD received an order from the FERC in October 2011 granting incentives for the RITELine IN and RITELine IL projects.  The projects and other segments that are electrically equivalent in nature are currently under consideration for inclusion in the interregional planning process between PJM and MISO.
(f)
AEP owns 86.5% of Transource Missouri through its ownership interest in Transource Energy, LLC (Transource).  Transource is a joint venture with AEPTHCo and Great Plains Energy formed to pursue competitive transmission projects.  AEPTHCo and Great Plains Energy own 86.5% and 13.5% of Transource, respectively.
(g)
The ROE represents the weighted average approved return on equity based on the projected costs of two projects currently under development by Transource Missouri:  the $65 million Iatan-Nashua project (10.3%) and the $333 million Sibley-Nebraska City project (11.3%).
(h)
RITELine IN and Transource Missouri are consolidated joint ventures by AEP.  Therefore, the investment value listed reflects applicable income taxes that are the responsibility of AEP.  All other investments in this schedule are joint ventures that are not consolidated by AEP.  Therefore, these investment values listed do not reflect income taxes that are the responsibility of AEP.


29



Our joint ventures do not have employees.  Business services for the joint ventures are provided by AEPSC and other AEP subsidiaries and the joint venture partners. During 2014 approximately 665 AEPSC employees and 260 operating company employees provided service to one or more joint ventures. The amount of service provided was equal to the service of approximately 195 full-time employees.

REGULATION

The Transcos and joint ventures located outside of ERCOT establish transmission rates annually through forward looking formula rate filings with the FERC pursuant to FERC-approved implementation protocols.  The protocols include a transparent, formal review process to ensure the updated transmission rates are prudently incurred and reasonably calculated.

The Transcos’ and joint ventures’ (where applicable) rates are included in the respective OATT for PJM and SPP.  An OATT is the FERC rate schedule that provides the terms and conditions for transmission and related services on a transmission provider’s transmission system.  The FERC requires transmission providers such as PJM and SPP to offer transmission service to all eligible customers (for example, load-serving entities, power marketers, generators and customers) on a non-discriminatory basis.

The FERC-approved formula rates establish the annual transmission revenue requirement (ATRR) and transmission service rates for transmission owners in annual rate base filings with FERC.  The formula rates establish rates for a one-year period based on the current projects in-service and proposed projects for a defined timeframe.  The formula rates also include a true-up calculation for the previous year’s billings, allowing for over- and under-recovery of the transmission owner’s ATRR.  PJM and SPP pay the transmission owners their ATRR for use of their facilities and bill transmission customers taking service under the PJM and SPP OATTs, based on the terms and conditions in the respective OATT for the service taken.

The formula rate mechanism allows for a return on equity of 11.49% based on a capital structure of up to 50% equity for the AEP East Transmission Companies.  The AEP West Transmission Companies are allowed a return on equity of 11.20% based on a capital structure of up to 50% equity. The authorized returns on equity for the Transcos are commensurate with the FERC-authorized returns on equity in the PJM and SPP OATTs, respectively, for AEP’s utility subsidiaries.

In the annual rate based filings described above, the Transcos in aggregate filed rate base totals of $1,448 million in 2014, $776 million for 2013 and $283 million for 2012.  The total transmission revenue requirement filed in the ATRR, including prior year over/under recovery of revenue and associated carrying charges, for 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $229 million, $107 million and $35 million, respectively.

The rates of ETT, which is located in ERCOT, are determined by the PUCT.  ETT sets its rates through a combination of base rate cases and interim Transmission Costs of Services (TCOS) filings.  ETT may file interim TCOS filings semi-annually to update its rates to reflect changes in its net invested capital.

Our joint ventures have approved returns on equity ranging from 9.96% to 12.8% based on equity capital structures ranging from 40% to 60%.

COMPETITION

One of the most significant provisions of FERC Order No. 1000 is the removal of the federal right of first refusal for incumbent utilities within tariffs and agreements for certain regional transmission projects. Historically, vertically integrated public utilities had the right to build and own transmission lines proposed by the region’s planning processes when those lines connected to facilities within their respective retail service territories.  FERC Order No. 1000 eliminates the federal right of first refusal in regional transmission organization (RTO) tariffs for incumbent utilities to construct certain regional transmission projects within their own service territories, thereby creating the opportunity for any qualified entity to build and own regional transmission facilities in any service territory.  Transource was created to respond to FERC Order No. 1000 competitive processes at the RTO level.


30



AEP RIVER OPERATIONS

Our AEP River Operations segment transports liquid, coal and dry bulk commodities primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi rivers.  Almost all of our customers are nonaffiliated third parties who obtain the transport of coal and dry bulk commodities for various uses.  We charge these customers market rates for the purpose of making a profit.  Depending on market conditions and other factors, including barge availability, we permit AEP utility subsidiary affiliates to use certain of our equipment at rates that reflect our cost.  Our affiliated utility customers procure the transport of coal for use as fuel in their respective generation plants.  AEP River Operations includes approximately 2,300 barges, 37 towboats and 18 harbor boats that we own or lease. In 2015, River Operations will operate its current fleet of 40 ten thousand barrel tank barges and may add an additional 40 ten thousand barrel tank barges throughout the year.  These assets are separate from the barges and towboats dedicated exclusively to transporting coal for use as fuel in our own generating facilities discussed under the prior segment.  See Item 1 – Vertically Integrated Utilities – Electric Generation – Fuel Supply – Coal and Lignite.

Competition within the barging industry for major commodity contracts is intense, with a number of companies offering transportation services in the waterways we serve.  We compete with other carriers primarily on the basis of commodity shipping rates, but also with respect to customer service, available routes, value-added services (including scheduling convenience and flexibility).  The industry continues to experience consolidation.  The resulting companies increasingly offer the widespread geographic reach necessary to support major national customers.  Demand for barging services can be seasonal, particularly with respect to the movement of harvested agricultural commodities (beginning in the late summer and extending through the fall).  Cold winter weather, water levels and inefficient older river locks may also limit our operations when certain of the waterways we serve are closed or commercial traffic is limited.

Our transportation operations are subject to regulation by the U.S. Coast Guard, federal laws, state laws and certain international conventions.  Legislation has been proposed that could make our towboats subject to inspection by the U.S. Coast Guard.


31



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF AEP as of February 20, 2015

The following persons are executive officers of AEP.  Their ages are given as of February 1, 2015 .  The officers are appointed annually for a one-year term by the board of directors of AEP.

Nicholas K. Akins
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Age 54
Chairman of the Board since January 2014, President since January 2011 and Chief Executive Officer since November 2011. Was Executive Vice President – Generation from September 2006 to December 2010.

Lisa M. Barton
Executive Vice President – Transmission
Age 49
Executive Vice President – Transmission of AEPSC since August 2011. Was Senior Vice President – Transmission Strategy and Business Development of AEPSC from November 2010 to July 2011, Vice President – Transmission Strategy and Business Development of AEPSC from October 2007 to November 2010.

David M. Feinberg
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Age 45
Executive Vice President since January 2013.  Was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from January 2012 to December 2012 and  Senior Vice President and General Counsel of AEPSC from May 2011 to December 2011. Previously served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Allegheny Energy, Inc. from 2006 to 2011.

Lana L. Hillebrand
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Age 54
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since December 2012.  Previously served as South Region leader – Senior Partner at Aon Hewitt since 2010.  Was U.S. Consulting Client Development leader – managing principal at Aon Hewitt from 2008-2010.

Mark C. McCullough
Executive Vice President – Generation
Age 55
Executive Vice President – Generation of AEPSC since January 2011.  Was Senior Vice President – Fossil & Hydro Generation of AEPSC from February 2008 to December 2010.

Robert P. Powers
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Age 61
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since November 2011.  Was President – Utility Group from April 2009 to November 2011.

Brian X. Tierney
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Age 47
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2009.  

Dennis E. Welch
Executive Vice President and Chief External Officer
Age 63
Executive Vice President and Chief External Officer since January 2013.  Was Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from October 2011 to December 2012.  Was Executive Vice President – Environment, Safety & Health and Facilities from January 2008 to September 2011.

32




Charles E. Zebula
Executive Vice President – Energy Supply
Age 54
Executive Vice President – Energy Supply since January 2013. Was Senior Vice President – Investor Relations and Treasurer from September 2008 to December 2012. 


33



ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS

GENERAL RISKS OF OUR REGULATED OPERATIONS

We may not be able to recover the costs of our substantial planned investment in capital improvements and additions. Affecting each Registrant

Our business plan calls for extensive investment in capital improvements and additions, including the installation of environmental upgrades and retrofits, construction of additional transmission facilities, modernizing existing infrastructure as well as other initiatives.  Our public utility subsidiaries currently provide service at rates approved by one or more regulatory commissions.  If these regulatory commissions do not approve adjustments to the rates we charge, we would not be able to recover the costs associated with our planned extensive investment.  This would cause our financial results to be diminished.

Our regulated electric revenues, earnings and results are dependent on state regulation that may limit our ability to recover costs and other amounts. Affecting each Registrant

The rates our customers pay to our regulated utility businesses are subject to approval by the FERC and the respective state utility commissions of Ohio, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Indiana, Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Michigan and Tennessee. If our regulated utility earnings exceed the returns established by the relevant commissions, retail electric rates may be subject to review and possible reduction by the commissions, which may decrease our future earnings. Additionally, if regulatory bodies do not allow recovery of costs incurred in providing service on a timely basis, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. Similarly, if recovery or other rate relief authorized in the past is overturned or reversed on appeal, our future earnings could be negatively impacted. Any regulatory action or litigation outcome that triggers a reversal of a regulatory asset or deferred cost, including fuel and related costs, generally results in an impairment to the balance sheet and a charge to the income statement of the company involved.

Our transmission investment strategy and execution bears certain risks associated with these activities. Affecting each Registrant

We expect that a growing portion of our earnings in the future will derive from the transmission investments and activities of AEPTCo and our transmission joint ventures.  FERC policy currently favors the expansion and updating of the transmission infrastructure within its jurisdiction.  If FERC were to adopt a different policy, if states were to limit or restrict such policies, or if transmission needs do not continue or develop as projected, our strategy of investing in transmission could be curtailed.  We believe our experience with transmission facilities construction and operation gives us an advantage over other competitors in securing authorization to install, construct and operate new transmission lines and facilities.  However, there can be no assurance that PJM, SPP or other RTOs will authorize any new transmission projects or will award any such projects to us.  If the FERC were to lower the rate of return it has authorized for our transmission investments and facilities, or if one or more states were to successfully limit FERC jurisdiction on recovery of costs on transmission investment and its return, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


34



We may not recover costs incurred to begin construction on projects that are canceled. Affecting each Registrant

Our business plan for the construction of new projects involves a number of risks, including construction delays, nonperformance by equipment and other third party suppliers, and increases in equipment and labor costs.  To limit the risks of these construction projects, we enter into equipment purchase orders and construction contracts and incur engineering and design service costs in advance of receiving necessary regulatory approvals and/or siting or environmental permits.  If any of these projects is canceled for any reason, including our failure to receive necessary regulatory approvals and/or siting or environmental permits, we could incur significant cancellation penalties under the equipment purchase orders and construction contracts.  In addition, if we have recorded any construction work or investments as an asset, we may need to impair that asset in the event the project is canceled.

We are exposed to nuclear generation risk. Affecting AEP and I&M

Through I&M, we own the Cook Plant.  It consists of two nuclear generating units for a rated capacity of 2,191 MW, or about 6% of the generating capacity in the AEP System.  We are, therefore, subject to the risks of nuclear generation, which include the following:

The potential harmful effects on the environment and human health resulting from the operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling and disposal of radioactive materials such as spent nuclear fuel.
Limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with our nuclear operations.
Uncertainties with respect to contingencies and assessment amounts triggered by a loss event (federal law requires owners of nuclear units to purchase the maximum available amount of nuclear liability insurance and potentially contribute to the losses of others).
Uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives.

There can be no assurance that I&M’s preparations or risk mitigation measures will be adequate if and when these risks are triggered.

The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities.  In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines or shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved.  Revised safety requirements promulgated by the NRC could necessitate substantial capital expenditures at nuclear plants such as ours.  In addition, although we have no reason to anticipate a serious nuclear incident at our plants, if an incident did occur, it could harm our results of operations or financial condition.  A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to limit or prohibit the operation or licensing of any domestic nuclear unit.  Moreover, a major incident at any nuclear facility in the U.S. could require us to make material contributory payments.

Costs associated with the operation (including fuel), maintenance and retirement of nuclear plants continue to be more significant and less predictable than costs associated with other sources of generation, in large part due to changing regulatory requirements and safety standards, availability of nuclear waste disposal facilities and experience gained in the operation of nuclear facilities.  Costs also may include replacement power, any unamortized investment at the end of the useful life of the Cook Plant (whether scheduled or premature), the carrying costs of that investment and retirement costs.  Our ability to obtain adequate and timely recovery of costs associated with the Cook Plant is not assured.


35



The different regional power markets in which we compete or will compete in the future have changing market and transmission structures, which could affect our performance in these regions. Affecting each Registrant

Our results are likely to be affected by differences in the market and transmission structures in various regional power markets.  The rules governing the various regional power markets, including SPP and PJM, may also change from time to time which could affect our costs or revenues.  Because the manner in which RTOs will evolve remains unclear, we are unable to assess fully the impact that changes in these power markets may have on our business.

We could be subject to higher costs and/or penalties related to mandatory reliability standards. Affecting each Registrant

As a result of EPACT, owners and operators of the bulk power transmission system are subject to mandatory reliability standards promulgated by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and enforced by the FERC.  The standards are based on the functions that need to be performed to ensure the bulk power system operates reliably and are guided by reliability and market interface principles.  Compliance with new reliability standards may subject us to higher operating costs and/or increased capital expenditures.  While we expect to recover costs and expenditures from customers through regulated rates, there can be no assurance that the applicable commissions will approve full recovery in a timely manner.  If we were found not to be in compliance with the mandatory reliability standards, we could be subject to sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties, which likely would not be recoverable from customers through regulated rates.

RISKS RELATED TO MARKET, ECONOMIC OR FINANCIAL VOLATILITY AND OTHER RISKS

Our financial performance may be adversely affected if we are unable to successfully operate our facilities or perform certain corporate functions. Affecting each Registrant

Our performance is highly dependent on the successful operation of our generation, transmission and distribution facilities.  Operating these facilities involves many risks, including:

Operator error and breakdown or failure of equipment or processes.
Operating limitations that may be imposed by environmental or other regulatory requirements.
Labor disputes.
Compliance with mandatory reliability standards, including mandatory cyber security standards.
Information technology failure that impairs our information technology infrastructure or disrupts normal business operations.
Information technology failure that affects our ability to access customer information or causes us to lose confidential or proprietary data that materially and adversely affects our reputation or exposes us to legal claims.
Fuel or water supply interruptions caused by transportation constraints, adverse weather such as drought, non-performance by our suppliers and other factors.
Catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, hurricanes, tornados, ice storms, terrorism (including cyber-terrorism), floods or other similar occurrences.

Hostile cyber intrusions could severely impair our operations, lead to the disclosure of confidential   information and damage our reputation. Affecting each Registrant

We own assets deemed as critical infrastructure, the operation of which is dependent on information technology systems. Further, the computer systems that run our facilities are not completely isolated from external networks. Parties that wish to disrupt the U.S. bulk power system or our operations could view our computer systems, software or networks as targets for cyber attack.  In addition, our business requires that we collect and maintain sensitive customer data, as well as confidential employee and shareholder information, which is subject to electronic theft or loss.


36



A successful cyber attack on the systems that control our generation, transmission, distribution or other assets could severely disrupt business operations, preventing us from serving customers or collecting revenues. The breach of certain business systems could affect our ability to correctly record, process and report financial information. A major cyber incident could result in significant expenses to investigate and repair security breaches or system damage and could lead to litigation, fines, other remedial action, heightened regulatory scrutiny and damage to our reputation. In addition, the misappropriation, corruption or loss of personally identifiable information and other confidential data could lead to significant breach notification expenses and mitigation expenses such as credit monitoring. We maintain cyber insurance to cover liabilities and losses directly arising from a potential cyber event.  We also maintain property and casualty insurance that may cover certain resultant physical damage or third-party injuries caused by potential cyber events.  However, damage and claims arising from such incidents may exceed the amount of any insurance available and other damage and claims arising from such incidents may not be covered at all. For these reasons, a significant cyber incident could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

In an effort to reduce the likelihood and severity of cyber intrusions, we have a comprehensive cyber security program designed to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and systems. In addition, we are subject to mandatory cyber security regulatory requirements. However, cyber threats continue to evolve and adapt, and, as a result, there is a risk that we could experience a successful cyber attack despite our current security posture and regulatory compliance efforts.

If we are unable to access capital markets on reasonable terms, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. Affecting each Registrant

We rely on access to capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows.  Volatility and reduced liquidity in the financial markets could affect our ability to raise capital and fund our capital needs, including construction costs and refinancing maturing indebtedness.  In addition, if capital is available only on less than reasonable terms or to borrowers whose creditworthiness is better than ours, capital costs could increase materially.  Restricted access to capital markets and/or increased borrowing costs could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Downgrades in our credit ratings could negatively affect our ability to access capital and/or to operate our power trading businesses. Affecting each Registrant

The credit ratings agencies periodically review our capital structure and the quality and stability of our earnings.  Any negative ratings actions could constrain the capital available to us and could limit our access to funding for our operations.  Our business is capital intensive, and we are dependent upon our ability to access capital at rates and on terms we determine to be attractive.  In periods of market turmoil, access to capital is difficult for all borrowers.  If our ability to access capital becomes significantly constrained, our interest costs will likely increase and could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Our power trading business relies on the investment grade ratings of our individual public utility subsidiaries’ senior unsecured long-term debt or on the investment grade ratings of AEP.  Most of our counterparties require the creditworthiness of an investment grade entity to stand behind transactions.  If those ratings were to decline below investment grade, our ability to operate our power trading business profitably would be diminished because we would likely have to deposit cash or cash-related instruments which would reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

AEP has no income or cash flow apart from dividends paid or other obligations due it from its subsidiaries. Affecting AEP

AEP is a holding company and has no operations of its own.  Its ability to meet its financial obligations associated with its indebtedness and to pay dividends on its common stock is primarily dependent on the earnings and cash flows of its operating subsidiaries, primarily its regulated utilities, and the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends to, or repay loans from, AEP.  Its subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities that have no obligation (apart from loans

37



from AEP) to provide AEP with funds for its payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions or other payments.  Payments to AEP by its subsidiaries are also contingent upon their earnings and business considerations.  AEP indebtedness and common stock dividends are structurally subordinated to all subsidiary indebtedness.

Our operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal or quarterly basis and with general economic and weather conditions. Affecting each Registrant

Electric power generation is generally a seasonal business.  In many parts of the country, demand for power peaks during the hot summer months, with market prices also peaking at that time.  In other areas, power demand peaks during the winter.  As a result, our overall operating results in the future may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis.  The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on the terms of power sale contracts that we enter into.  In addition, we have historically sold less power, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are milder.  Unusually mild weather in the future could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.  Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase AEP’s results of operations in a manner that would not likely be sustainable.

Further, deteriorating economic conditions generally result in reduced consumption by our customers, particularly industrial customers who may curtail operations or cease production entirely, while an expanding economic environment generally results in increased revenues.  As a result, prevailing economic conditions may reduce our future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could harm our results of operations. Affecting each Registrant

Certain events, such as an aging workforce without appropriate replacements, mismatch of skillset or complement to future needs, or unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges and increased costs.  The challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge and a lengthy time period associated with skill development.  In this case, costs, including costs for contractors to replace employees, productivity costs and safety costs, may rise.  Failure to hire and adequately train replacement employees, including the transfer of significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to the new employees, or the future availability and cost of contract labor may adversely affect the ability to manage and operate our business.  If we are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, our future net income and cash flows may be reduced.

Changes in commodity prices and the costs of transport may increase our cost of producing power or decrease the amount we receive from selling power, harming our financial performance. Affecting each Registrant

We are exposed to changes in the price and availability of coal and the price and availability to transport coal.  We have existing contracts of varying durations for the supply of coal, but as these contracts end or otherwise are not honored, we may not be able to purchase coal on terms as favorable as the current contracts.  Similarly, we are exposed to changes in the price and availability of emission allowances.  We use emission allowances based on the amount of coal we use as fuel and the reductions achieved through emission controls and other measures.  As long as current environmental programs remain in effect, we have sufficient emission allowances to cover the majority of our projected needs for the next two years and beyond.  If the Federal EPA is able to create a replacement rule to reduce interstate transport, and it is acceptable by the courts, additional costs may be incurred either to acquire additional allowances or to achieve further reductions in emissions.  If we need to obtain allowances under a replacement rule, those purchases may not be on as favorable terms as those under the current environmental programs.  Our risks relative to the price and availability to transport coal include the volatility of the price of diesel which is the primary fuel used in transporting coal by barge.


38



We also own natural gas-fired facilities which exposes us to market prices of natural gas.  Historically, natural gas prices have tended to be more volatile than prices for other fuel sources. Recently however, the availability of natural gas from shale production has lessened price volatility. Our ability to make sales at a profit is highly dependent on the price of natural gas.  As the price of natural gas falls, other market participants that utilize natural gas-fired generation will be able to offer electricity at increasingly competitive prices relative to our sales prices, so the margins we realize from sales will be lower and, on occasion, we may need to curtail operation of marginal plants.  We expect the availability of shale natural gas and issues related to its accessibility will have a long-term material effect on the price and volatility of natural gas.

Prices for coal, natural gas and emission allowances have shown material upward and downward swings in the past.  Changes in the cost of coal, emission allowances or natural gas and changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

In addition, actual power prices and fuel costs will differ from those assumed in financial projections used to value our trading and marketing transactions, and those differences may be material.  As a result, as those transactions are marked to market, those transactions may reduce future results of operations and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Our AEP River Operations segment is subject to risks that are beyond our control. Affecting AEP

Our AEP River Operations segment transports liquid, coal and dry bulk commodities primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi rivers.  These activities can be hazardous and depend on natural conditions and forces.  Our river transport operations could result in an environmental event such as a serious spill or release.  In addition, if drought conditions or other factors cause the water levels of one or more of these rivers to drop below the amount necessary to permit commercial barging traffic, it would prevent our AEP River Operations from transporting cargo on the affected river.  Conversely, if unusually high amounts of precipitation or other factors cause the water levels of one or more of these rivers to be too high to permit commercial barging traffic, it would prevent our AEP River Operations from transporting cargo on the affected river.  Extreme water levels that do not close river basin commercial traffic can still harm our business if the levels curtail the total volume permitted to move on the affected river. The levels on portions of the Mississippi River in 2013 were near the lowest since the levels caused by severe drought in 1988.  Water levels during 2014 were improved and generally considered favorable for barge operations. Any reduction in the commercial activities of our AEP River Operations due to extreme water levels could reduce future net income and cash flows.

We are subject to physical and financial risks associated with climate change. Affecting each Registrant

Climate change creates physical and financial risk.  Physical risks from climate change include an increase in sea level and changes in weather conditions, such as changes in precipitation and extreme weather events.  Our customers’ energy needs vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity.  For residential customers, heating and cooling represent their largest energy use.  To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of the changes.

Increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in additional generating assets, transmission and other infrastructure to serve increased load.  Decreased energy use due to weather changes may affect our financial condition, through decreased revenues.  Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stress, including service interruptions.  Weather conditions outside of our service territory could also have an impact on our revenues.  We buy and sell electricity depending upon system needs and market opportunities.  Extreme weather conditions creating high energy demand on our own and/or other systems may raise electricity prices as we buy short-term energy to serve our own system, which would increase the cost of energy we provide to our customers.


39



Severe weather impacts our service territories, primarily when thunderstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes and snow or ice storms occur.  To the extent the frequency of extreme weather events increases, this could increase our cost of providing service.  Changes in precipitation resulting in droughts or water shortages could adversely affect our operations, principally our fossil generating units.  A negative impact to water supplies due to long-term drought conditions could adversely impact our ability to provide electricity to customers, as well as increase the price they pay for energy.  We may not recover all costs related to mitigating these physical and financial risks.

To the extent climate change impacts a region’s economic health, it may also impact our revenues.  Our financial performance is tied to the health of the regional economies we serve.  The price of energy, as a factor in a region’s cost of living as well as an important input into the cost of goods and services, has an impact on the economic health of our communities.

We cannot predict the outcome of the legal proceedings relating to our business activities. Affecting each Registrant

We are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising out of our business operations, the most significant of which are summarized in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse outcomes in these proceedings could require significant expenditures that could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

RISKS RELATING TO STATE RESTRUCTURING

Customers are choosing alternative electric generation service providers, as allowed by Ohio law and regulation. Affecting AEP

Under current Ohio law, electric generation is sold in a competitive market in Ohio and native load customers in Ohio have the ability to switch to alternative suppliers for their electric generation service.  CRES providers are targeting retail customers by offering alternative generation service.   As customer switching in Ohio continues, it could reduce AGR’s future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Collection of our revenues in Texas is concentrated in a limited number of REPs. Affecting AEP

Our revenues from the distribution of electricity in the ERCOT area of Texas are collected from REPs that supply the electricity we distribute to their customers.  Currently, we do business with approximately one hundred REPs.  In 2014, TCC’s largest REP accounted for 25% of its operating revenue and its second largest REP accounted for 23% of its operating revenue; TNC’s largest REP accounted for 11% of its operating revenues, and its second largest REP accounted for 9% of its operating revenues.  Adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the Texas market or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for our services or cause them to delay such payments.  We depend on these REPs for timely remittance of payments.  Any delay or default in payment could reduce future cash flows and impact financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OWNING AND OPERATING GENERATION ASSETS AND SELLING POWER

Our costs of compliance with existing environmental laws are significant. Affecting each Registrant

Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to air quality, water quality, waste management, natural resources and health and safety.  Approximately 90% of the electricity generated by the AEP System is produced by the combustion of fossil fuels.  Emissions of nitrogen and sulfur oxides, mercury and particulates from fossil fueled generation plants are subject to increased regulations, controls and mitigation expenses.  Compliance with these legal requirements requires us to commit significant capital toward environmental monitoring, installation of pollution control equipment, emission fees and permits at all of our facilities and could cause us to retire generating capacity prior to the end of its estimated useful life.  These expenditures have been significant in the past, and we expect that they will continue to be significant in order to comply with the current and proposed regulations.  Costs of compliance with environmental regulations could reduce future net income and

40



impact financial condition, especially if emission and/or discharge limits are tightened, more extensive permitting requirements are imposed or additional substances become regulated.  If we retire generation plants prior to the end of their estimated useful life, there can be no assurance that we will recover the remaining costs associated with such plants.  We typically recover our expenditures for pollution control technologies, replacement generation, undepreciated plant balances and associated operating costs from customers through regulated rates in regulated jurisdictions.  Failure to recover these costs could reduce our future net income and cash flows and possibly harm our financial condition.   For our sales of energy from our competitive units, there is no such cost-recovery mechanism.   As a result, we may not recover our costs through the market and we may be forced to shut competitive units down.  The costs of compliance for our competitive units could reduce our future net income and cash flows and possibly harm our financial condition.


Regulation of CO 2 emissions could materially increase costs to us and our customers or cause some of our electric generating units to be uneconomical to operate or maintain. Affecting each Registrant

The U.S. Congress has not taken any significant steps toward enacting legislation to control CO 2 emissions since 2009.  In December 2009, the Federal EPA issued a final endangerment finding under the CAA regarding emissions from motor vehicles.  The Federal EPA finalized CO 2 emission standards for new motor vehicles and issued a rule that implements a permitting program for new and modified stationary sources of CO 2 emissions in a phased manner.  Several groups have filed challenges to the endangerment finding and the Federal EPA’s subsequent rulemakings.  The Supreme Court agreed to review whether the Federal EPA reasonably determined that establishing standards for new motor vehicles automatically triggered regulation of stationary sources through the prevention of significant deterioration and Title V permitting programs, and determined that the Federal EPA was neither compelled nor authorized to automatically regulate stationary sources of CO 2 emissions under these programs, but that the Federal EPA could establish requirements for best available control technology reviews of CO 2 emissions for sources otherwise required to obtain a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit if their emissions exceed a reasonable level.  The Federal EPA must undertake additional rulemaking to establish such requirements and a reasonable level.

In 2012, the Federal EPA issued a proposed CO 2 emissions standard for new power generation sources.  In response to the comments submitted on this proposed rule, and in accordance with a directive from the President, the Federal EPA withdrew the April 2012 proposed rule and has issued a new proposal.  This proposed rule includes separate, but equivalent, standards for natural gas and coal-fired units, based on the use of partial carbon capture and storage at coal units.  In June 2014, the Federal EPA issued standards for modified and reconstructed units, and a guideline for the development of state implementation plans that would reduce carbon emissions from existing utility units. The guidelines for existing sources include aggressive emission rate goals that are composed of a number of measures.  Management believes some policy approaches being discussed would have significant and widespread negative consequences for the national economy and major U.S. industrial enterprises, including AEP and our customers.

CO 2 standards could require significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs and could impact the dates for retirement of our coal-fired units.  We typically recover costs of complying with new requirements such as the potential CO 2 and other greenhouse gases emission standards from customers through regulated rates in regulated jurisdictions.  For our sales of energy into the markets, however, there is no such recovery mechanism.  Failure to recover these costs, should they arise, could reduce our future net income and cash flows and possibly harm our financial condition.


41



We may be harmed if our merchant generation fleet is not profitable or loses value. Affecting AEP

We are evaluating strategic alternatives for our merchant generation fleet, which primarily includes AGR’s generation fleet which operates in PJM and a 54.7% interest in the Oklaunion Plant which operates in ERCOT.    Potential alternatives may include, but are not limited to, continued operation of the merchant generation fleet, executing a PPA with a regulated affiliate for certain merchant generation units in Ohio, a spin-off of the merchant generation fleet or a sale of the merchant generation fleet.  We have not made a decision regarding the potential alternatives, nor have we set a specific timeframe for a decision.  Certain of these alternatives could result in a loss which could reduce future net income and cash flow and impact financial condition.

Amounts we receive from the results of PJM capacity auctions associated with our nonregulated generation assets could fail to adequately compensate us. Affecting AEP

Financial returns on AGR’s generation capacity are subject to the results of annual PJM capacity auctions.  Recent auction results indicate a great deal of volatility and the possibility of clearing prices substantially lower than the cost of such capacity.   We expect a significant decline in AGR capacity revenues after May 2015 when the Power Supply Agreement between AGR and OPCo ends.  Additionally, we expect a decline in AGR capacity revenues from June 2016 through May 2017 based upon the decrease in the PJM base auction price.  PJM recently proposed at FERC a set of supplemental auctions for 2016/17 and 2017/18. Those auctions may mitigate the decline in capacity revenues.  However, this proposal has not yet been accepted at FERC and we can give no assurance that the FERC will approve the proposal.  If the PJM capacity auctions continue to result in clearing prices lower than the cost of our capacity, it could reduce our future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Courts adjudicating nuisance and other similar claims in the future may order us to pay damages or to limit or reduce our emissions. Affecting each Registrant

In the past, there have been several cases seeking damages based on allegations of federal and state common law nuisance in which we, among others, were defendants.  In general, the actions allege that emissions from the defendants’ power plants constitute a public nuisance.  The plaintiffs in these actions generally seek recovery of damages and other relief.  If future actions are resolved against us, substantial modifications of our existing coal-fired power plants could be required and we might be required to limit or reduce emissions.  Such remedies could require us to purchase power from third parties to fulfill our commitments to supply power to our customers.  This could have a material impact on our costs.  In addition, we could be required to invest significantly in additional emission control equipment, accelerate the timing of capital expenditures, pay damages or penalties and/or halt operations.  While management believes such costs should be recoverable from customers as costs of doing business in our jurisdictions where generation rates are set on a cost of service basis, without such recovery, those costs could reduce our future net income and cash flows and harm our financial condition.  Moreover, our results of operations and financial position could be reduced due to the timing of recovery of these investments and the expense of ongoing litigation.

Changes in technology and regulatory policies may lower the value of our generating facilities. Affecting each Registrant

We primarily generate electricity at large central facilities. This method results in economies of scale and lower costs than (a) newer technologies such as fuel cells, microturbines, wind turbines and photovoltaic solar cells and (b) distributed generation using either new or existing technology.  Other technologies, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs), increase the efficiency of electricity and, as a result, lower the demand for it. It is possible that advances in technologies, the availability of distributed generation or changes in regulatory policies will lower the demand for electricity or reduce the costs of new technology to levels that are equal to or below that of most central station electricity production, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.


42



Our profitability is impacted by our continued authorization to sell power at market-based rates. Affecting each Registrant

FERC has granted AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo authority to sell electricity at market-based rates. FERC reserves the right to revoke or revise this market-based rate authority if it subsequently determines that one or more of these companies can exercise market power in transmission or generation, create barriers to entry or engage in abusive affiliate transactions.  Each company that has obtained market-based rate authority from FERC must file a market power update every three years to show that they continue to meet FERC’s standards with respect to generation market power and other criteria used to evaluate whether entities qualify for market-based rates.  The loss of market-based rate authority by any of these entities, especially by AGR, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our revenues and results of operations from selling power are subject to market risks that are beyond our control. Affecting each Registrant

We sell power from our generation facilities into the spot market and other competitive power markets on a contractual basis.  We also enter into contracts to purchase and sell electricity, natural gas, emission allowances and coal as part of our power marketing and energy trading operations.  With respect to such transactions, the rate of return on our capital investments is not determined through mandated rates, and our revenues and results of operations are likely to depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices for power in our regional markets and other competitive markets.  These market prices can fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time.  Trading margins may erode as markets mature and there may be diminished opportunities for gain should volatility decline.  In addition, the FERC, which has jurisdiction over wholesale power rates, as well as RTOs that oversee some of these markets, may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address some of the volatility in these markets.  Power supply and other similar agreements entered into during extreme market conditions may subsequently be held to be unenforceable by a reviewing court or the FERC.  Fuel and emissions prices may also be volatile, and the price we can obtain for power sales may not change at the same rate as changes in fuel and/or emissions costs.  These factors could reduce our margins and therefore diminish our revenues and results of operations.  Volatility in market prices for fuel and power may result from:

Weather conditions, including storms.
Economic conditions.
Outages of major generation or transmission facilities.
Seasonality.
Power usage.
Illiquid markets.
Transmission or transportation constraints or inefficiencies.
Availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources.
Demand for energy commodities.
Natural gas, crude oil and refined products and coal production levels.
Natural disasters, wars, embargoes and other catastrophic events.
Federal, state and foreign energy and environmental regulation and legislation and/or incentives.

Commodity trading and marketing activities are subject to inherent risks which can be reduced and controlled but not eliminated. Affecting each Registrant

We attempt to manage the exposure of or power trading activities by establishing and enforcing risk limits and risk management procedures.  These risk limits and risk management procedures may not work as planned and cannot eliminate the risks associated with these activities.  As a result, we cannot predict the impact that our energy trading and risk management decisions may have on our business, operating results or financial position.

We routinely have open trading positions in the market, within guidelines we set, resulting from the management of our trading portfolio.  To the extent open trading positions exist, fluctuating commodity prices can improve or diminish our financial results and financial position.


43



Our power trading risk management activities, including our power sales agreements with counterparties, rely on projections that depend heavily on judgments and assumptions by management of factors such as the future market prices and demand for power and other energy-related commodities.  These factors become more difficult to predict and the calculations become less reliable the further into the future these estimates are made.  Even when our policies and procedures are followed and decisions are made based on these estimates, results of operations may be diminished if the judgments and assumptions underlying those calculations prove to be inaccurate.

We may not successfully manage the uncertainty involved with our power trading (including coal, natural gas and emission allowances trading and power marketing). Affecting each Registrant

Our power trading activities also expose us to risks of commodity price movements.  To the extent that our power trading does not hedge the price risk associated with the generation it owns, or controls, through long-term power purchase agreements, we would be exposed to the risk of rising and falling spot market prices.

For example, the use of new technologies to recover natural gas from shale deposits has increased natural gas supply and reserves, placing further downward pressure on natural gas prices, and has reduced the need for our coal-fired generation. Further, in the event that alternative generation resources, such as wind and solar, are mandated or otherwise subsidized or encouraged through climate legislation or regulation and added to the available generation supply, such resources could displace a higher marginal cost fossil plant, which could reduce the price at which market participants sell their electricity. This occurrence could then reduce the market price at which all generators in that region would be able to sell their output. These events could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and could also result in an impairment of certain long-lived assets.

In connection with these trading activities, we routinely enter into financial contracts, including futures and options, over-the counter options, financially-settled swaps and other derivative contracts.  These activities expose us to risks from price movements.  If the values of the financial contracts change in a manner we do not anticipate, it could harm our financial position or reduce the financial contribution of our trading operations.

Parties with whom we have contracts may fail to perform their obligations, which could harm our results of operations. Affecting each Registrant

We are exposed to the risk that counterparties that owe us money or power could breach their obligations.  Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we may be forced to enter into alternative hedging arrangements or honor underlying commitments at then-current market prices that may exceed our contractual prices, which would cause our financial results to be diminished and we might incur losses.  Although our estimates take into account the expected probability of default by a counterparty, our actual exposure to a default by a counterparty may be greater than the estimates predict.

We rely on electric transmission facilities that we do not own or control.  If these facilities do not provide us with adequate transmission capacity, we may not be able to deliver our wholesale electric power to the purchasers of our power. Affecting each Registrant

We depend on transmission facilities owned and operated by other nonaffiliated power companies to deliver the power we sell at wholesale.  This dependence exposes us to a variety of risks.  If transmission is disrupted, or transmission capacity is inadequate, we may not be able to sell and deliver our wholesale power.  If a region’s power transmission infrastructure is inadequate, our recovery of wholesale costs and profits may be limited.  If restrictive transmission price regulation is imposed, the transmission companies may not have sufficient incentive to invest in expansion of transmission infrastructure.

The FERC has issued electric transmission initiatives that require electric transmission services to be offered unbundled from commodity sales.  Although these initiatives are designed to encourage wholesale market transactions, access to transmission systems may in fact not be available if transmission capacity is insufficient because of physical constraints or because it is contractually unavailable.  We also cannot predict whether transmission facilities will be expanded in specific markets to accommodate competitive access to those markets.

44



ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES

GENERATION FACILITIES

As of December 31, 2014  the AEP System owned (or leased where indicated) generation plants, all situated in the states in which our electric utilities serve retail customers, where applicable, with net maximum power capabilities (winter rating) shown in the following tables:

Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment
AEGCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
 Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Rockport, Units 1 and 2 – 50% of each (a)
 
2
 
IN
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,310

 
1984
Lawrenceburg (b)
 
6
 
IN
 
Natural Gas
 
1,186

 
2004
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,496

 
 

(a)
Rockport, Unit 2 is leased.
(b)
The capacity and output of this plant is under contract to (and its financial impact is included with) AGR through 2017.
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
 Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Buck
 
3
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
9

 
1912
Byllesby
 
4
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
22

 
1912
Claytor
 
4
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
76

 
1939
Leesville
 
2
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
50

 
1964
London
 
3
 
WV
 
Hydro
 
14

 
1935
Marmet
 
3
 
WV
 
Hydro
 
14

 
1935
Niagara
 
2
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
2

 
1906
Reusens
 
5
 
VA
 
Hydro
 
13

 
1904
Winfield
 
3
 
WV
 
Hydro
 
15

 
1938
Ceredo
 
6
 
WV
 
Natural Gas
 
516

 
2001
Dresden
 
3
 
OH
 
Natural Gas
 
613

 
2012
Smith Mountain
 
5
 
VA
 
Pumped Storage
 
586

 
1965
Amos
 
3
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
2,900

 
1971
Clinch River
 
3
 
VA
 
Steam - Coal
 
705

 
1958
Glen Lyn
 
2
 
VA
 
Steam - Coal
 
322

 
1918
Kanawha River
 
2
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
400

 
1953
Mountaineer
 
1
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,320

 
1980
Sporn
 
2
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
300

 
1950
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,877

 
 

45



I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Berrien Springs
 
12
 
MI
 
Hydro
 
7

 
1908
Buchanan
 
10
 
MI
 
Hydro
 
4

 
1919
Constantine
 
4
 
MI
 
Hydro
 
1

 
1921
Elkhart
 
3
 
IN
 
Hydro
 
3

 
1913
Mottville
 
4
 
MI
 
Hydro
 
2

 
1923
Twin Branch
 
6
 
IN
 
Hydro
 
5

 
1904
Rockport (Units 1 and 2, 50% of each) (a)
 
2
 
IN
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,310

 
1984
Tanners Creek
 
4
 
IN
 
Steam - Coal
 
995

 
1951
Cook
 
2
 
MI
 
Steam - Nuclear
 
2,191

 
1975
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,518

 
 

(a)
Rockport, Unit 2 is leased.

The following table provides operating information related to the Cook Plant:
 
Cook Plant
 
Unit 1
 
Unit 2
Year Placed in Operation
1975

 
1978

Year of Expiration of NRC License
2034

 
2037

Nominal Net Electrical Rating in Kilowatts
1,084,000

 
1,107,000

Annual Capacity Utilization
 
 
 
2014
87.4
%
 
96.3
%
2013
82.7
%
 
86.9
%
2012
96.9
%
 
87.4
%
2011
81.3
%
 
99.4
%
KPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Big Sandy
 
2
 
KY
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,078

 
1963
Mitchell (a)
 
2
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
780

 
1971
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,858

 
 

(a)
KPCo owns a 50% interest in the Mitchell Units.  As of December 31, 2014, AGR owned the remaining 50% which it transferred to WPCo on January 31, 2015.

46



PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Comanche
 
3
 
OK
 
Natural Gas
 
266

 
1973
Riverside, Units 3 and 4
 
2
 
OK
 
Natural Gas
 
152

 
2008
Southwestern, Units 4 and 5
 
2
 
OK
 
Natural Gas
 
170

 
2008
Tulsa
 
2
 
OK
 
Natural Gas
 
318

 
1956
Weleetka
 
3
 
OK
 
Natural Gas
 
198

 
1975
Northeastern, Units 3 and 4
 
2
 
OK
 
Steam - Coal
 
937

 
1979
Oklaunion (a)
 
1
 
TX
 
Steam - Coal
 
102

 
1986
Northeastern, Units 1 and 2
 
2
 
OK
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
923

 
1961
Riverside, Units 1 and 2
 
2
 
OK
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
908

 
1974
Southwestern, Units 1, 2 and 3
 
3
 
OK
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
462

 
1952
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,436

 
 

(a)
Jointly-owned with TNC and non-affiliated entities.  Figures presented reflect only the portion owned by PSO.

SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Mattison
 
4
 
AR
 
Natural Gas
 
313

 
2007
Stall
 
1
 
LA
 
Natural Gas
 
534

 
2010
Flint Creek (a)
 
1
 
AR
 
Steam - Coal
 
264

 
1978
Turk (a)
 
1
 
AR
 
Steam - Coal
 
477

 
2012
Welsh
 
3
 
TX
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,584

 
1977
Dolet Hills (a)
 
1
 
LA
 
Steam - Lignite
 
257

 
1986
Pirkey (a)
 
1
 
TX
 
Steam - Lignite
 
580

 
1985
Arsenal Hill
 
1
 
LA
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
110

 
1960
Knox Lee
 
4
 
TX
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
475

 
1950
Lieberman (b)
 
4
 
LA
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
242

 
1947
Lone Star
 
1
 
TX
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
50

 
1954
Wilkes
 
3
 
TX
 
Steam - Natural Gas
 
893

 
1964
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,779

 
 

(a)
Jointly-owned with nonaffiliated entity(ies).  Figures presented reflect only the portion owned by SWEPCo.
(b)
Unit 1 was inactive in 2014.


47



Generation & Marketing Segment

AGR  (formerly owned by OPCo)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant
 or First Unit Commissioned
Racine
 
2
 
OH
 
Hydro
 
48

 
1982
Darby
 
6
 
OH
 
Natural Gas
 
507

 
2001
Waterford
 
4
 
OH
 
Natural Gas
 
840

 
2003
Cardinal
 
1
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
595

 
1967
Conesville (a)
 
3
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,159

 
1957
Gavin
 
2
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
2,670

 
1974
Kammer
 
3
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
630

 
1958
Mitchell (b)
 
2
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
780

 
1971
Muskingum River
 
5
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
1,380

 
1953
Picway
 
1
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
100

 
1926
Sporn
 
2
 
WV
 
Steam - Coal
 
300

 
1950
Stuart (a)
 
4
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
600

 
1971
Zimmer (a)
 
1
 
OH
 
Steam - Coal
 
330

 
1991
Total MWs (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,939

 
 

(a)
Jointly-owned with nonaffiliated entities.  Figures presented reflect only the portion owned by AGR.
(b)
As of December 31, 2014, AGR owned a 50% interest in the Mitchell Units which it transferred to WPCo on January 31, 2015.  KPCo owns the remaining 50%.
(c)
AGR has contractual rights through 2017 to a natural gas-fired 1,186 MW generating unit located in Lawrenceburg, IN.
Domestic Independent Power
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plant Name
 
Units
 
State
 
Fuel Type
 
Net Maximum
Capacity (MWs)
 
Year Plant Commissioned
Trent Mesa
 
100
 
TX
 
Wind
 
150

 
2001
Desert Sky
 
107
 
TX
 
Wind
 
161

 
2001
Total MWs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
311

 
 

In addition to the AGR and Domestic Independent Power generation set forth above, a subsidiary in the Generation & Marketing segment has contractual rights through 2027 from TNC to 355 MWs from the Oklaunion Generating Plant, a coal-fired unit located in Vernon, TX.  TNC co-owns the Oklaunion Generating Plant with PSO and several non-affiliated entities.


48



TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

The following table sets forth the total overhead circuit miles of transmission and distribution lines of the AEP System and its operating companies and that portion of the total representing 765kV lines:

Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment
 
 
Total Overhead Circuit Miles of Transmission and Distribution Lines
 
Circuit Miles of   765kV Lines
APCo
 
51,612

 
733

I&M
 
21,868

 
616

KGPCo
 
1,401

 

KPCo
 
11,171

 
257

PSO
 
20,877

 

SWEPCo
 
27,434

 

WPCo
 
1,731

 

Total Circuit Miles
 
136,094

 
1,606


Transmission and Distribution Utilities Segment
 
 
Total Overhead Circuit Miles of Transmission and Distribution Lines
 
Circuit Miles of   765kV Lines
OPCo (a)
 
45,486

 
507

TCC
 
29,515

 

TNC
 
17,127

 

Total Circuit Miles
 
92,128

 
507

(a)
Includes 766 miles of 345,000 volt jointly owned lines.

AEP Transmission Holdco Segment

The following table sets forth the total overhead circuit miles of transmission lines of ETT, IMTCo, OHTCo, and OKTCo, none of which own 765 kV lines:
 
Total Overhead Circuit Miles of Transmission Lines
ETT
1,528

IMTCo
30

OHTCo
161

OKTCo
256

Total Circuit Miles
1,975


TITLE TO PROPERTY

The AEP System’s generating facilities are generally located on lands owned in fee simple.  The greater portion of the transmission and distribution lines of the AEP System has been constructed over lands of private owners pursuant to easements or along public highways and streets pursuant to appropriate statutory authority.  The rights of AEP’s public utility subsidiaries in the realty on which their facilities are located are considered adequate for use in the conduct of their business.  Minor defects and irregularities customarily found in title to properties of like size and character may exist, but such defects and irregularities do not materially impair the use of the properties affected thereby.  AEP’s public utility subsidiaries generally have the right of eminent domain which permits them, if necessary, to acquire, perfect or secure titles to or easements on privately held lands used or to be used in their utility operations.  Recent legislation in Ohio and Virginia has restricted the right of eminent domain previously granted for power generation purposes.

49



SYSTEM TRANSMISSION LINES AND FACILITY SITING

Laws in the states of Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia require prior approval of sites of generating facilities and/or routes of high-voltage transmission lines.  We have experienced delays and additional costs in constructing facilities as a result of proceedings conducted pursuant to such statutes and in proceedings in which our operating companies have sought to acquire rights-of-way through condemnation.  These proceedings may result in additional delays and costs in future years.

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

With input from its state utility commissions, the AEP System continuously assesses the adequacy of its generation, transmission, distribution and other facilities to plan and provide for the reliable supply of electric power and energy to its customers.  In this assessment process, assumptions are continually being reviewed as new information becomes available and assessments and plans are modified, as appropriate.  AEP forecasts approximately $4.5 billion of construction expenditures for 2015 , including debt AFUDC and assets acquired under leases.  Estimated construction expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, weather, legal reviews and the ability to access capital.  For additional information on our construction program, see Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis under the heading entitled Budgeted Construction Expenditures for each Registrant.

POTENTIAL UNINSURED LOSSES

Some potential losses or liabilities may not be insurable or the amount of insurance carried may not be sufficient to meet potential losses and liabilities, including liabilities relating to damage to our generation plants and costs of replacement power.  Unless allowed to be recovered through rates, future losses or liabilities which are not completely insured could reduce net income and impact the financial conditions of AEP and other AEP System companies.  For risks related to owning a nuclear generating unit, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies under the heading Nuclear Contingencies for information with respect to nuclear incident liability insurance.

ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of material legal proceedings, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, entitled Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, incorporated by reference in Item 8.

ITEM 4.   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) imposes stringent health and safety standards on various mining operations.  The Mine Act and its related regulations affect numerous aspects of mining operations, including training of mine personnel, mining procedures, equipment used in mine emergency procedures, mine plans and other matters.  SWEPCo, through its ownership of Dolet Hills Lignite Company (DHLC), a wholly-owned lignite mining subsidiary of SWEPCo, and AGR, through its use of the Conner Run fly ash impoundment, is subject to the provisions of the Mine Act.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder require companies that operate mines to include in their periodic reports filed with the SEC, certain mine safety information covered by the Mine Act.  Exhibit 95 “Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit” contains the notices of violation and proposed assessments received by DHLC and Conner Run under the Mine Act for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 .

50



PART II

ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

AEP

In addition to the discussion below, the remaining information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under AEP Common Stock and Dividend Information and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements entitled Financing Activities under the heading Dividend Restrictions in the 2014 Annual Report.

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The common stock of these companies is held solely by AEP.  The information regarding the amounts of cash dividends on common stock paid by these companies to AEP during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 are incorporated by reference to the material under Statements of Changes in Common Shareholder’s Equity and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements entitled Financing Activities under the heading Dividend Restrictions in the 2014 Annual Reports.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2014 , neither AEP nor its publicly-traded subsidiaries purchased equity securities that are registered by AEP or its publicly-traded subsidiaries pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

AEP

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under Selected Consolidated Financial Data in the 2014 Annual Reports.

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(a). Management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations and other information required by Instruction I(2)(a) is incorporated herein by reference to the material under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2014 Annual Reports.

ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

AEP

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2014 Annual Reports.

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(a).  Management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations and other information required by Instruction I(2)(a) is incorporated herein by reference to the material under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2014 Annual Reports.


51



ITEM 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

AEP, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in the 2014 Annual Reports.

ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

AEP, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the financial statements and financial statement schedules described under Item 15 herein.

ITEM 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

AEP, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

None.

ITEM 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

During 2014 , management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of each of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (“AEP”), Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company (each a “Registrant” and collectively the “Registrants”) evaluated each respective Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures.  Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as controls and other procedures of the Registrant that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrants in the reports that they file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrants in the reports that they file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to each Registrant’s management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of December 31, 2014 , these officers concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures in place are effective and provide reasonable assurance that the disclosure controls and procedures accomplished their objectives.  The Registrants continually strive to improve their disclosure controls and procedures to enhance the quality of their financial reporting and to maintain dynamic systems that change as events warrant.

There have been no changes in the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter 2014 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting

Management assessed and reported on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  As a result of that assessment, management determined that there were no material weaknesses as of December 31, 2014 and, therefore, concluded that each Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Additional information required by this item of the Registrants is incorporated by reference to Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, included in the 2014 Annual Report of each Registrant.
 
ITEM 9B.   OTHER INFORMATION

None.

52



PART III

ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c).

AEP

Directors, Director Nomination Process and Audit Committee

Certain of the information called for in this Item 10, including the information relating to directors, is incorporated herein by reference to AEP's definitive proxy information statement (which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) relating to 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2015 Annual Meeting) including under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “AEP’s Board of Directors and Committees,” “Directors,” “Involvement by Mr. Hoaglin in Certain Legal Proceedings” and “Shareholder Nominees for Directors.”

Executive Officers

Reference also is made to the information under the caption Executive Officers of the Registrants in Part I, Item 4 of this report.

Code of Ethics

AEP’s Principles of Business Conduct is the code of ethics that applies to AEP’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer.  The Principles of Business Conduct is available on AEP’s website at www.aep.com.  The Principles of Business Conduct will be made available, without charge, in print to any shareholder who requests such document from Investor Relations, American Electric Power Company, Inc., 1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio  43215.

If any substantive amendments to the Principles of Business Conduct are made or any waivers are granted, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Principles of Business Conduct, to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or principal accounting officer, AEP will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on AEP’s website, www.aep.com, or in a report on Form 8-K.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to information contained in the definitive proxy statement of AEP for the 2015 Annual Meeting.

ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c).

AEP

The information called for by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to AEP’s definitive proxy statement (which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) relating to the 2015 Annual Meeting including under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation”, “Director

53



Compensation” and “ 2014 Director Compensation Table”.  The information set forth under the subcaption “Human Resources Committee Report” and “Audit Committee Report” should not be deemed filed nor should it be incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent we specifically incorporate such report by reference therein.

ITEM 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c).

AEP

The information relating to Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners is incorporated herein by reference to AEP’s definitive proxy statement (which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) relating to 2015 Annual Meeting under the caption “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.”

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes the ability of AEP to issue common stock pursuant to equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014:
Plan Category
 
Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Warrants and Rights
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 
Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (a)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders
 

 
 
NA
 
15,825,643

 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
 

 
 

 
 

 
Total
 

 
 
NA
 
15,825,643

 

(a)
AEP deducts equity compensation granted in stock units that are paid in cash, rather than AEP common shares, such as AEP’s performance units and deferred stock units, from the number of shares available for future grants under the Amended and Restated American Electric Power System Long-Term Incentive Plan.  The number of shares available under this plan would be 2,809,209 higher if equity compensation that is paid in cash were not deducted from this column.
NA      Not applicable.

ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Omitted pursuant to Instruction I(2)(c).


54



AEP

The information called for by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to AEP’s definitive proxy statement (which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) relating to the 2015 Annual Meeting under the captions “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Director Independence.”

ITEM 14.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

AEP

The information called for by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to AEP’s definitive proxy statement (which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) relating to the 2015 Annual Meeting under the captions “Audit and Non-Audit Fees,” “Audit Committee Report” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Auditor.”

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Each of the above is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP and does not have a separate audit committee.  A description of the AEP Audit Committee pre-approval policies, which apply to these companies, is contained in the definitive proxy statement of AEP for the 2015 Annual Meeting of shareholders.  The following table presents directly billed fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of these companies’ annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , and fees directly billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP during those periods.  Deloitte & Touche LLP also provides additional professional and other services to the AEP System, the cost of which may ultimately be allocated to these companies though not billed directly to them.  For a description of these fees and services, see the description of principal accounting fees and services for AEP, above.
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Audit Fees
$
2,103,482

 
$
2,342,744

 
$
1,563,434

 
$
1,552,346

 
$
1,111,667

 
$
3,119,885

Audit-Related Fees
108,305

 
104,923

 
53,508

 
51,488

 
83,594

 
128,535

Tax Fees
26,915

 
22,556

 
21,117

 
16,677

 
15,719

 
278,029

Total
$
2,238,702

 
$
2,470,223

 
$
1,638,059

 
$
1,620,511

 
$
1,210,980

 
$
3,526,449

 
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
Audit Fees
$
599,890

 
$
641,720

 
$
1,216,430

 
$
1,131,155

 
 
Audit-Related Fees
25,622

 
21,920

 
41,118

 
102,633

 
 
Tax Fees
8,482

 
7,100

 
15,503

 
12,505

 
 
Total
$
633,994

 
$
670,740

 
$
1,273,051

 
$
1,246,293

 

55



PART IV

ITEM 15.   EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
The following financial statements have been incorporated herein by reference pursuant to Item 8.

AEP and Subsidiary Companies:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting; Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 ; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

APCo, I&M and OPCo:
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 ; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries; Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

PSO:
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Statements of Changes in Common Shareholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 ; Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries; Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

SWEPCo:
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 ; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ; Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries; Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
2.  FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:
 
Page Number
Financial Statement Schedules are listed in the Index of Financial Statement Schedules.  (Certain schedules have been omitted because the required information is contained in the notes to financial statements or because such schedules are not required or are not applicable). Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
S-1
 
 
 
3.  EXHIBITS:
 
 
Exhibits for AEP, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page E-1 and are incorporated herein by reference.
 
E-1

56



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Executive Vice President
 
 
and Chief Financial Officer)

Date: February 20, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
 
(i)
Principal Executive Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  /s/   Nicholas K. Akins
 
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Nicholas K. Akins)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(ii)
Principal Financial Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iii)
Principal Accounting Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Joseph M. Buonaiuto
 
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Joseph M. Buonaiuto)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iv)           
A Majority of the Directors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Nicholas K. Akins
 
 
 
 
 
*David J. Anderson
 
 
 
 
 
* J. Barnie Beasley, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
* Ralph D. Crosby, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
*Linda A. Goodspeed
 
 
 
 
 
*Thomas E. Hoaglin
 
 
 
 
 
*Sandra Beach Lin
 
 
 
 
 
*Richard C. Notebaert
 
 
 
 
 
*Lionel L. Nowell, III
 
 
 
 
 
*Stephen S. Rasmussen
 
 
 
 
 
*Oliver G. Richard, III
 
 
 
 
 
*Sara Martinez Tucker
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*By: 
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Attorney-in-Fact)
 
 
 
 


57



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

 
Appalachian Power Company
 
Ohio Power Company
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

Date: February 20, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.  The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
 
(i)
Principal Executive Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Nicholas K. Akins
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Nicholas K. Akins)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(ii)
Principal Financial Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iii) 
Principal Accounting Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Joseph M. Buonaiuto
 
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Joseph M. Buonaiuto)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iv)
A Majority of the Directors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Nicholas K. Akins
 
 
 
 
 
*Lisa M. Barton
 
 
 
 
 
*David M. Feinberg
 
 
 
 
 
*Lana L. Hillebrand
 
 
 
 
 
*Mark C. McCullough
 
 
 
 
 
*Robert P. Powers
 
 
 
 
 
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
 
 
*Dennis E. Welch
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*By:                                                                                    
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Attorney-in-Fact)
 
 
 
 

58



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

 
Indiana Michigan Power Company
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Executive Vice President
 
 
and Chief Financial Officer)

Date: February 20, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.  The signature of each of the undersigned shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to the above-named company and any subsidiaries thereof.
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
 
(i)
Principal Executive Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Nicholas K. Akins
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Nicholas K. Akins)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(ii)
Principal Financial Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iii)
Principal Accounting Officer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/   Joseph M. Buonaiuto
 
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Joseph M. Buonaiuto)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(iv)
A Majority of the Directors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Nicholas K. Akins
 
 
 
 
 
*Lisa M. Barton
 
 
 
 
 
*Paul Chodak, III
 
 
 
 
 
*Thomas A. Kratt
 
 
 
 
 
*Marc E. Lewis
 
 
 
 
 
*David A. Lucas
 
 
 
 
 
*Mark C. McCullough
 
 
 
 
 
*Robert P. Powers
 
 
 
 
 
*Carla E. Simpson
 
 
 
 
 
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
 
 
*Barry O. Wiard
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*By:
/s/   Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
February 20, 2015
 
(Brian X. Tierney, Attorney-in-Fact)
 
 
 
 

59



INDEX OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 
Page
Number
 
 
The following financial statement schedules are included in this report on the pages indicated:
 
 
 
American Electric Power Company, Inc. (Parent):
 
 
 
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies:
 
 
 
Appalachian Power Company and Subsidiaries:
 
 
 
Indiana Michigan Power Company and Subsidiaries:
 
 
 
Ohio Power Company and Subsidiaries:
 
 
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma:
 
 
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated:
 


S-1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
American Electric Power Company, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, and have issued our reports thereon dated February 20, 2015; such consolidated financial statements and reports are included in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report and are incorporated herein by reference.  Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of the Company listed in Item 15.  These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Appalachian Power Compan y
Indiana Michigan Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company

We have audited the financial statements of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries, Indiana Michigan Power Company and subsidiaries, Ohio Power Company and subsidiaries, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, and Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated (collectively the “Companies”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and have issued our reports thereon dated February 20, 2015; such financial statements and reports are included in the Companies’ 2014 Annual Reports and are incorporated herein by reference.  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of each of the Companies listed in Item 15.  These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Companies’ management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


S-2



SCHEDULE I
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (Parent)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in millions, except per-share and share amounts)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 

Affiliated Revenues
 
$
7

 
$
4

 
$
4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 

 
 

 
 

Other Operation
 
27

 
21

 
22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING LOSS
 
(20
)
 
(17
)
 
(18
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest Income
 
7

 
21

 
22

Interest Expense
 
(17
)
 
(17
)
 
(90
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LOSS BEFORE EQUITY EARNINGS
 
(30
)
 
(13
)
 
(86
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
1,664

 
1,493

 
1,345

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
1,634

 
1,480

 
1,259

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Comprehensive Income
 
12

 
217

 
133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
$
1,646

 
$
1,697

 
$
1,392

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
 
488,592,997

 
486,619,555

 
484,682,469

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF DILUTED AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
 
488,899,840

 
487,040,956

 
485,084,694

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Information beginning on page S-7.



S-3



SCHEDULE I
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (Parent)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in millions)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 

 
 

Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
63

 
$
36

Other Temporary Investments
 
2

 
2

Advances to Affiliates
 
769

 
539

Accounts Receivable:
 
 

 
 

General
 
8

 

Affiliated Companies
 
13

 
11

Total Accounts Receivable
 
21

 
11

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
4

 
6

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
859

 
594

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 

 
 

General
 
1

 
1

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
1

 
1

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
1

 
1

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  NET
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 

 
 

Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
17,475

 
16,353

Affiliated Notes Receivable
 
45

 
80

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
57

 
57

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
17,577

 
16,490

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
18,436

 
$
17,084


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Information beginning on page S-7.


S-4



SCHEDULE I
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (Parent)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in millions)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Advances from Affiliates
 
$
116

 
$
41

Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
1

 

Affiliated Companies
 
2

 
13

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
 
3

 
4

Short-term Debt
 
602

 
57

Other Current Liabilities
 
11

 
5

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
735

 
120

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt
 
840

 
836

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
41

 
43

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
881

 
879

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
1,616

 
999

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – Par Value – $6.50 Per Share:
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
Shares Authorized
600,000,000
 
600,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
Shares Issued
509,739,159
 
508,113,964
 
 
 
 
 
(20,336,592 Shares were Held in Treasury as of December 31, 2014 and 2013)
 
3,313

 
3,303

Paid-in Capital
 
6,204

 
6,131

Retained Earnings
 
7,406

 
6,766

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
(103
)
 
(115
)
TOTAL AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
16,820

 
16,085

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
$
18,436

 
$
17,084


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Information beginning on page S-7.


S-5



SCHEDULE I
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (Parent)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in millions)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 

 
 

 
 

Net Income
 
$
1,634

 
$
1,480

 
$
1,259

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from
 
 
 
 
 
 
from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
(1,664
)
 
(1,493
)
 
(1,345
)
Cash Dividends Received from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
956

 
1,027

 
1,294

Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
1

 
2

 
13

Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
16

 
16

 
22

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
(10
)
 
96

 
(47
)
Accounts Payable
 
(10
)
 
(423
)
 
(10
)
Other Current Liabilities
 
6

 
(73
)
 
72

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
929

 
632

 
1,258

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 
(230
)
 
111

 
294

Capital Contributions to Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
(523
)
 
(358
)
 
(325
)
Return of Capital Contributions from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
123

 
375

 

Repayments of Notes Receivable from Affiliated Companies
 
35

 
205

 
5

Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Investing Activities
 
(595
)
 
333

 
(26
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
 
73

 
84

 
83

Issuance of Long-term Debt
 

 
199

 
843

Change in Short-term Debt, Net
 
545

 
(264
)
 
(646
)
Retirement of Long-term Debt
 

 
(200
)
 
(558
)
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 
75

 
41

 

Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(992
)
 
(949
)
 
(911
)
Other Financing Activities
 
(8
)
 
(6
)
 
(4
)
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
(307
)
 
(1,095
)
 
(1,193
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
27

 
(130
)
 
39

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
36

 
166

 
127

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
63

 
$
36

 
$
166


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Information beginning on page S-7.

S-6



SCHEDULE I
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (Parent)
INDEX OF CONDENSED NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
2.     Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
 
3.     Financing Activities
 
4.     Related Party Transactions


S-7



1.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The condensed financial information of AEP (Parent) is required as a result of the restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries exceeding 25% of consolidated net assets as of December 31, 2014 .  Parent is a public utility holding company that owns all of the outstanding common stock of its public utility subsidiaries and varying percentages of other subsidiaries, including joint ventures and equity investments.  The primary source of income for Parent is equity in its subsidiaries’ earnings.  Its major source of cash is dividends from the subsidiaries.  Parent borrows the funds for the money pool that is used by the subsidiaries for their short-term cash needs.

Income Taxes

Parent files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries.  AEP System’s current consolidated federal income tax is allocated to AEP System companies so that their current tax expense reflects a separate return result for each company in the consolidated group.  The tax benefit of Parent is allocated to its subsidiaries with taxable income.
 
2.   COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES

Parent and its subsidiaries are parties to environmental and other legal matters.  For further discussion of commitments, guarantees and contingencies, see Note 6 in the 2014 Annual Reports.

3.   FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The following details long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Long-term Debt
 
 
Weighted Average
 
Interest Rate Ranges as of
 
Outstanding as of
 
 
Interest Rate as of
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
Type of Debt and Maturity
 
December 31, 2014
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Senior Unsecured Notes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017-2022
 
2.11%
 
1.65%-2.95%
 
1.65% - 2.95%
 
$
850

 
$
850

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Interest Rate Hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6
)
 
(9
)
Unamortized Discount, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
843

 
840

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3

 
4

Long-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
840

 
$
836


Long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 is payable as follows:
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
2019
 
After 2019
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Principal Amount
$
3

 
$
(15
)
 
$
556

 
$

 
$

 
$
300

 
$
844

Unamortized Discount, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
(1
)
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
$
843



S-8



Short-term Debt

Parent's outstanding short-term debt was as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Type of Debt
 
Outstanding
Amount
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 
Outstanding
Amount
 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
 
 
(in millions)
 
 

 
(in millions)
 
 

Commercial Paper
 
$
602

 
0.59
%
 
$
57

 
0.29
%
Total Short-term Debt
 
$
602

 
 

 
$
57

 
 


4.   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Payments on Behalf of Subsidiaries

Due to occasional time sensitivity and complexity of payments, Parent makes certain insurance, tax and benefit payments on behalf of subsidiary companies.  Parent is then fully reimbursed by the subsidiary companies.

Short-term Lending to Subsidiaries

Parent uses a commercial paper program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of subsidiaries.  The program is used to fund both a Utility Money Pool, which funds the utility subsidiaries, and a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds the majority of the nonutility subsidiaries.  In addition, the program also funds, as direct borrowers, the short-term debt requirements of other subsidiaries that are not participants in either money pool for regulatory or operational reasons.  The program also allows some direct borrowers to invest excess cash with Parent.

Interest expense related to Parent’s short-term borrowing is included in Interest Expense on Parent’s statements of income.  Parent incurred interest expense for amounts borrowed from subsidiaries of $413 thousand, $7 thousand and $11 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

Interest income related to Parent’s short-term lending is included in Interest Income on Parent’s statements of income.  Parent earned interest income for amounts advanced to subsidiaries of $4 million, $4 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

Global Borrowing Notes

Parent issued long-term debt, portions of which were loaned to its subsidiaries.  Parent pays interest on the global notes, but the subsidiaries accrue interest for their share of the global borrowing and remit the interest to Parent.  Interest income related to Parent’s loans to subsidiaries is included in Interest Income on Parent’s statements of income.  Parent earned interest income on loans to subsidiaries of $3 million, $15 million and $15 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.

S-9



SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
AEP
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
 Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in millions)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
60

 
$
51

 
$
9

 
$
99

 
$
21

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
36

 
51

 
21

 
48

 
60

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
32

 
53

 
3

 
52

 
36


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
APCo
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
 Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in thousands)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
2,443

 
$
8,965

 
$
2,526

 
$
11,570

 
$
2,364

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
6,087

 
4,737

 
1,768

 
10,149

 
2,443

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
5,289

 
15,652

 
1,689

 
16,543

 
6,087


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
I&M
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
 Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in thousands)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
184

 
$
152


$
211

 
$
53

 
$
494

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
229

 
(40
)
(c)

 
5

 
184

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
1,750

 
20

 

 
1,541

 
229


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
(c)
Recoveries on previous reserve balance.

S-10



OPCo
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
Distribution
of OPCo
Generation
to Parent
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged
to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in thousands)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
34,984

 
$
1,236

 
$
8,012

 
$
44,061

 
$

 
$
171

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
129

 
15,722


19,191

 
51

 
(7
)
 
34,984

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
3,563

 
(9
)
(c)
43

 
3,468

 

 
129


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
(c)
Recoveries on previous reserve balance.
PSO
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in thousands)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
462

 
$
(273
)
(c)
$

 
$
42

 
$
147

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
872

 
(122
)
(c)

 
288

 
462

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
777

 
95

 

 

 
872


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
(c)
Recoveries on previous reserve balance.
SWEPCo
 
 
 
Additions
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
Charged to Other
Accounts (a)
 
Deductions (b)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
(in thousands)
Deducted from Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
1,418

 
$
452


$
(1,353
)
(c)
$
1

 
$
516

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
2,041

 
(143
)
(c)
2

 
482

 
1,418

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
989

 
71

 
981

 

 
2,041


(a)
Recoveries offset by reclasses to other assets and liabilities.
(b)
Uncollectible accounts written off.
(c)
Recoveries on previous reserve balance.

S-11



EXHIBIT INDEX

The documents listed below are being filed or have previously been filed on behalf of the Registrants shown and are incorporated herein by reference to the documents indicated and made a part hereof.  Exhibits (“Ex”) not identified as previously filed are filed herewith.  Exhibits designated with a dagger (†) are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form.  Exhibits designated with an asterisk (*) are filed herewith.
Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
AEP‡   File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Composite of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AEP, dated April 28, 2009.
 
2009 Form 10-K, Ex 3(a)
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Composite By-Laws of AEP, as amended as of September 25, 2012.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 3.1 dated September 26, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of May 1, 2001, between AEP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-86050, Ex 4(a)(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-105532, Ex 4(d)(e)(f)
Registration Statement No. 333-200956, Ex 4(b)
 
 
 
 
 
*4(b)
 
$1.75 Billion Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014, among AEP, the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages thereof, and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*4(c)
 
$1.75 Billion Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014, among AEP, the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages thereof, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4(d)
 
$1 Billion Term Credit Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2013, among AEP, APCo, OPCo, AEP Generation Resources Inc., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages thereof, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 4, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
10(a)
 
Interconnection Agreement, dated July 6, 1951, among APCo, CSPCo, KPCo, OPCo and I&M and with AEPSC, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 2-52910, Ex 5(a)
Registration Statement No. 2-61009, Ex 5(b)
1990 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)(3)]
 
 
 
 
 
10(b)
 
Transmission Agreement, effective November 2010, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo with AEPSC as agent.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(c)
 
 
 
 
 
10(c)
 
Transmission Coordination Agreement dated January 1, 1997, restated and amended by and among PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC.
 
2009 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated as of June 2, 1997, of PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(e)(1)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)(1)
 
PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2001, among Load Serving Entities in the PJM West service area.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(e)(2)
 
 
 
 
 

E-1



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
10(d)(2)
 
Master Setoff and Netting Agreement among PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(e)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
10(e)
 
Lease Agreements, dated as of December 1, 1989, between AEGCo or I&M and Wilmington Trust Company, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 33-32752, Ex 28(c)(1-6)(C)
Registration Statement No. 33-32753, Ex 28(a)(1-6)(C)
AEGCo 1993 Form 10-K, Ex 10(c)(1-6)(B)
I&M 1993 Form 10-K, Ex 10(e)(1-6)(B)
 
 
 
 
 
10(f)
 
Modification No. 1 to the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement, dated July 28, 1994, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo and AEPSC.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 10(1)
 
 
 
 
 
10(g)
 
Consent Decree with U.S. District Court dated October 9, 2007, as modified.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 10.1 dated October 9, 2007
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
†10(h)
 
AEP Accident Coverage Insurance Plan for Directors.
 
1985 Form 10-K, Ex 10(g)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(i)
 
AEP Retainer Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective January 1, 2005, as amended February 9, 2007.
 
2007 Form 10-K, Ex 10(j)(i)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(j)
 
 
Amended and Restated AEP Stock Unit Accumulation Plan for Non-Employee Directors effective January 1, 2013.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, March 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
†10(k)
 
AEP System Excess Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 10(l)(1)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(k)(1)
 
Guaranty by AEP of AEPSC Excess Benefits Plan.
 
1990 Form 10-K, Ex 10(h)(1)(B)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(l)
 
AEP System Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2011 (Non-Qualified).
 
2010 Form 10-K, Ex 10(l)(2)
 
 
 
 
 
*†10(l)(1)(A)
 
Amendment to AEP System Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2011 (Non-Qualified).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†10(m)
 
AEPSC Umbrella Trust for Executives.
 
1993 Form 10-K, Ex 10(g)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(m)(1)(A)
 
First Amendment to AEPSC Umbrella Trust for Executives.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex   10(l)(3)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(n)
 
Employment Agreement dated July 29, 1998 between AEPSC and Robert P. Powers.
 
2002 Form 10-K, Ex 10(m)(4)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(n)(1)(A)
 
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 9, 2008 between AEPSC and Robert P. Powers.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 10(m)(4)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(o)
 
 
 
AEP System Senior Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan amended and restated as of February 28, 2012.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†10(p)
 
AEP System Survivor Benefit Plan, effective January 27, 1998.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, September 30, 1998
 
 
 
 
 
†10(p)(1)(A)
 
First Amendment to AEP System Survivor Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective January 31, 2000.
 
2002 Form 10-K, Ex 10(o)(2)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(p)(2)(A)
 
Second Amendment to AEP System Survivor Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 10(o)(1)(B)
 
 
 
 
 

E-2



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
†10(q)
 
AEP System Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 10(p)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(q)(1)(A)
 
First Amendment to AEP System Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008.
 
2011 Form 10-K, Ex 10(p)(1)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
*†10(q)(2)(A)
 
Second Amendment to AEP System Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*†10(r)
 
AEP Change In Control Agreement, as Revised Effective January 1, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†10(s)
 
Amended and Restated AEP System Long-Term Incentive Plan as of September 25, 2012.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, September 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
†10(s)(1)(A)
 
Performance Share Award Agreement furnished to participants of the AEP System Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.
 
2011 Form 10-K, Ex 10(t)(1)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(s)(2)(A)
 
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement furnished to participants of the AEP System Long-Term Incentive Plan Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2013.
 
2012 Form 10-K, Ex 10 (t)(2)(A)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(t)
 
AEP System Stock Ownership Requirement Plan Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2014.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
*†10(t)(1)(A)
 
First Amendment to AEP System Stock Ownership Requirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
†10(u)
 
Central and South West System Special Executive Retirement Plan Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 10(v)
 
 
 
 
 
†10(v)
 
AEP Executive Severance Plan effective January 1, 2014.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 10.1 dated January 15, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
†10(w)
 
Letter Agreement dated November 20, 2012 between AEPSC and Lana Hillebrand
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(s)
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the AEP 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*21
 
List of subsidiaries of AEP.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*23
 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

E-3



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo‡   File No. 1-3457
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2(a)
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 31, 2013 by and between Newco Appalachian Inc. and Appalachian Power Company.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 2.1 dated December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Composite of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of APCo, amended as of March 7, 1997.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 3(d)
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Composite By-Laws of APCo, amended as of February 26, 2008.
 
2007 Form 10-K, Ex 3(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of January 1, 1998, between APCo and The Bank of New York, As Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-45927, Ex 4(a)(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-49071, Ex 4(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-84061, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-100451, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-116284, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-123348, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-136432, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-161940, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-182336, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-200750, Ex. 4(b)(c)


 
 
 
 
 
4(b)
 
$1 Billion Term Credit Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2013, among AEP, APCo, OPCo, AEP Generation Resources Inc., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages thereof, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.
 
Form 10Q, Ex 4, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
10(a)
 
Inter-Company Power Agreement, dated as of July 10, 1953, among OVEC and the Sponsoring Companies, as amended September 10, 2010.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)
 
 
 
 
 
10(b)
 
Interconnection Agreement, dated July 6, 1951, among APCo, CSPCo, KPCo, OPCo and I&M and with AEPSC, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 2-52910, Ex 5(a)
Registration Statement No. 2-61009, Ex 5(b)
1990 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)(3), File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(c)
 
Transmission Agreement, effective November 2010, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo with AEPSC as agent.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(c)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(1)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)(1)
 
PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement among Load Serving Entities in the PJM West service area.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(2)
 
 
 
 
 

E-4



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
10(d)(2)
 
Master Setoff and Netting Agreement among PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
10(e)
 
Modification No. 1 to the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement, dated July 28, 1994, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo and AEPSC.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 10(l), File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(f)
 
Consent Decree with U.S. District Court, as modified
 
Form 8-K, Ex 10.1 dated October 9, 2007
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the APCo 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*23
 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
I&M‡   File No. 1-3570
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Composite of the Amended Articles of Acceptance of I&M, dated of March 7, 1997.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 3(c)
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Composite By-Laws of I&M, amended as of February 26, 2008.
 
2007 Form 10-K, Ex 3(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of October 1, 1998, between I&M and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-88523, Ex 4(a)(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-58656, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-108975, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-136538, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-156182, Ex 4(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-185087, Ex 4(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(b)
 
Company Order and Officers Certificate to The Bank of New York Mellon dated March 18, 2013 of 3.20% Series J due 2023.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4(a) dated March 18, 2013
 
 
 
 
 

E-5



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
10(a)
 
Inter-Company Power Agreement, dated as of July 10, 1953, among OVEC and the Sponsoring Companies, as amended September 10, 2010.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)
 
 
 
 
 
10(b)
 
Interconnection Agreement, dated July 6, 1951, among APCo, CSPCo, KPCo, I&M, and OPCo and with AEPSC, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 2-52910, Ex 5(a)
Registration Statement No. 2-61009, Ex 5(b)
1990 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)(3), File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(b)(1)
 
Unit Power Agreement dated as of March 31, 1982 between AEGCo and I&M, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 33-32752,
Ex 28(b)(1)(A)(B)
 
 
 
 
 
10(c)
 
Transmission Agreement, effective November 2010, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo with AEPSC as agent.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(c)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(1)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)(1)
 
PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement among Load Serving Entities in the PJM West service area.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(2)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)(2)
 
Master Setoff and Netting Agreement among PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
10(e)
 
Modification No. 1 to the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement, dated July 28, 1994, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo and AEPSC.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 10(l), File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(f)
 
Consent Decree with U.S. District Court, as modified.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 10.1 dated October 9, 2007
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
10(g)
 
Lease Agreements, dated as of December 1, 1989, between I&M and Wilmington Trust Company, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 33-32753, Ex 28(a)(1-6)(C)
1993 Form 10-K, Ex 10(e)(1-6)(B)
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the I&M 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*23
 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

E-6



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
OPCo‡   File No.1-6543
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2(a)
 
Asset Contribution Agreement effective as of December 31, 2013 by and between Ohio Power Company and AEP Generation Resources Inc.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 2.1 dated December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
2(b)
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger of Ohio Power Company and Columbus Southern Power Company entered into as of December 31, 2012.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 2.1 dated January 6, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Composite of the Amended Articles of Incorporation of OPCo, dated June 3, 2002.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 3(e), June 30, 2002
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Amended Code of Regulations of OPCo.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 3(b), June 30, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of September 1, 1997, between OPCo and Bankers Trust Company (now Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-49595, Ex 4(a)(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-106242, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-75783, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-127913, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-139802, Ex 4(a)(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-139802, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-161537, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
 
 
 
 
 
4(b)
 
Company Order and Officer’s Certificate to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated September 24, 2009, establishing terms of 5.375% Senior Notes, Series M due 2021.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4(a) dated September 24, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
4(c)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of February 1, 2003, between OPCo and Bank One, N.A., as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-127913, Ex 4(d)(e)(f)
 
 
 
 
 
4(d)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of September 1, 1997, between CSPCo (predecessor in interest to OPCo) and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-54025, Ex 4(a)(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-128174, Ex 4(b)(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-150603. Ex 4(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(e)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of February 1, 2003, between CSPCo (predecessor in interest to OPCo) and Bank One, N.A., as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-128174, Ex 4(e)(f)(g)
Registration Statement No. 333-150603 Ex 4(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(f)
 
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 31, 2012, by and between OPCo and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, supplementing the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1997 between CSPCo (predecessor in interest to OPCo) and the trustee.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4.1 dated January 6, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
4(g)
 
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 31, 2012, by and between OPCo and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, supplementing the Indenture dated as of February 14, 2003 between CSPCo (predecessor in interest to OPCo) and the trustee.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4.2 dated January 6, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
4(h)
 
CSPCo (predecessor in interest to OPCo) Company Order and Officer’s Certificate to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated May 16, 2008, establishing terms of 6.05% Senior Notes, Series G, due 2018.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4(a), dated May 16, 2008

E-7



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4(i)
 
$1 Billion Term Credit Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2013, among AEP, APCo, OPCo, AEP Generation Resources Inc., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signature pages thereof, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.
 
Form 10Q, Ex 4, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
10(a)
 
 
Inter-Company Power Agreement, dated July 10, 1953, among OVEC and the Sponsoring Companies, as amended September 10, 2010.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)
 
 
 
 
 
10(b)
 
Interconnection Agreement, dated July 6, 1951, among APCo, CSPCo, KPCo, I&M and OPCo and with AEPSC, as amended.
 
Registration Statement No. 2-52910, Ex 5(a)
Registration Statement No. 2-61009, Ex 5(b)
1990 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)(3), File 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(c)
 
Transmission Agreement, effective November 2010, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo with AEPSC as agent.
 
2013 Form 10-K, Ex 10(a)
 
 
 
 
 
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(1)
 
 
 
 
 
10(e)
 
PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement among Load Serving Entities in the PJM West service area.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(2)
 
 
 
 
 
10(f)
 
Master Setoff and Netting Agreement among PJM and AEPSC on behalf of APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo, KGPCo and WPCo.
 
2004 Form 10-K, Ex 10(d)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
10(g)
 
Modification No. 1 to the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement, dated July 28, 1994, among APCo, CSPCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo and AEPSC.
 
1996 Form 10-K, Ex 10(l), File No. 1-3525
 
 
 
 
 
10(h)
 
Consent Decree with U.S. District Court, as modified.
 
Form 8-K, Item Ex 10.1 dated October 9, 2007
Form 10-Q, Ex 10, June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the OPCo 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*95
 
Mine Safety Disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 

E-8



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
PSO‡   File No. 0-343
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PSO.
 
Form 10-Q, Ex 3(a), June 30, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Composite By-Laws of PSO amended as of February 26, 2008.
 
2007 Form 10-K, Ex 3 (b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of November 1, 2000, between PSO and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
 
 
Registration Statement No. 333-100623, Ex 4(a)(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-114665, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-133548, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-156319, Ex 4(b)(c)
 
 
 
 
 
4(b)
 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 13, 2009 between PSO and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, establishing terms of the 5.15% Senior Notes, Series H, due 2019.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4(a), dated November 13, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
4(c)
 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 19, 2011 between PSO and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, establishing terms of 4.40% Senior Notes, Series I, due 2021.
 
Form 8-K, Ex 4(a) dated January 20, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
10(a)
 
Third Restated and Amended Transmission Coordination Agreement Between PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC dated February 18, 2011.
 
2012 Form 10-K, Ex 10(b)
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the PSO 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

E-9



Exhibit
Designation
 
Nature of Exhibit
 
Previously Filed as Exhibit to:
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo‡   File No. 1-3146
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3(a)
 
Composite of Amended Restated Certificate of Incorporation of SWEPCo.
 
2008 Form 10-K, Ex 3(a)
 
 
 
 
 
3(b)
 
Composite By-Laws of SWEPCo amended as of February 26, 2008.
 
2007 Form 10-K, Ex 3(b)
 
 
 
 
 
4(a)
 
Indenture (for unsecured debt securities), dated as of February 4, 2000, between SWEPCo and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.
 
Registration Statement No. 333-96213
Registration Statement No. 333-87834, Ex 4(a)(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-100632, Ex 4(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-108045, Ex 4(b)
Registration Statement No. 333-145669, Ex 4(c)(d)
Registration Statement No. 333-161539, Ex 4(b)(c)
Registration Statement No. 333-194991, Ex 4(b)(c)
 
 
 
 
 
10(a)
 
Third Restated and Amended Transmission Coordination Agreement Between PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC dated February 18, 2011.
 
2012 Form 10-K, Ex 10(b)
 
 
 
 
 
*12
 
Statement re: Computation of Ratios.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*13
 
Copy of those portions of the SWEPCo 2014 Annual Report (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) which are incorporated by reference in this filing.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*24
 
Power of Attorney.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*31(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*32(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*95
 
Mine Safety Disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
 
 

‡ Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrants included in the financial statements of registrants filed herewith have been omitted because the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of registrants.  The registrants hereby agree to furnish a copy of any such omitted instrument to the SEC upon request.



E-10
Exhibit 4(b)

CONFORMED COPY
 
U.S. $1,750,000,000

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of November 10, 2014
among
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
as the Borrower
THE LENDERS NAMED HEREIN
as Initial Lenders
THE LC ISSUING BANKS NAMED HEREIN
and
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
as Administrative Agent
 

BARCLAYS BANK PLC
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC
Joint Lead Arrangers

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION
Syndication Agent

THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI
UFJ, LTD.
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS
BRANCH
Documentation Agents





TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
Page
 
 
 
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
1

 
 
 
 
SECTION 1.01. Certain Defined Terms
1

 
SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods
21

 
SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms
21

 
SECTION 1.04. Other Interpretive Provisions
21

 
 
 
ARTICLE II AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES
21

 
 
 
 
SECTION  2.01. The Advances
21

 
SECTION  2.02. Making the Advances
21

 
SECTION  2.03. [Reserved]
23

 
SECTION  2.04. Letters of Credit
23

 
SECTION  2.05. Fees
27

 
SECTION  2.06. Extension of the Termination Date
27

 
SECTION  2.07. Increase of the Commitments
28

 
SECTION  2.08. Termination or Reduction of the Commitments
29

 
SECTION  2.09. Repayment of Advances
30

 
SECTION  2.10. Evidence of Indebtedness
30

 
SECTION  2.11. Interest on Advances
31

 
SECTION  2.12. Interest Rate Determination
31

 
SECTION  2.13. Optional Conversion of Advances
32

 
SECTION  2.14. Optional Prepayments of Advances
33

 
SECTION  2.15. Increased Costs
33

 
SECTION  2.16. Illegality
34

 
SECTION  2.17. Payments and Computations
35

 
SECTION  2.18. Taxes
36

 
SECTION  2.19. Sharing of Payments, Etc
40

 
SECTION  2.20. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders
40

 
 
 
ARTICLE III CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
42

 
 
 
 
SECTION  3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement and Initial Extensions of Credit
42

 
SECTION  3.02. Conditions Precedent to each Extension of Credit
44

 
 
 
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
44

 
 
 
 
SECTION  4.01. Representations and Warranties of the Borrower
44

 
 
 
ARTICLE V COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER
47

 
 
 
 
SECTION  5.01. Affirmative Covenants
47


i


 
SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants
50

 
SECTION 5.03. Financial Covenant
52

 
 
 
ARTICLE VI EVENTS OF DEFAULT
52

 
 
 
 
SECTION 6.01. Events of Default
52

 
SECTION 6.02. Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default
54

 
 
 
ARTICLE VII THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
55

 
 
 
 
SECTION 7.01. Authorization and Action
55

 
SECTION 7.02. Agent’s Reliance, Etc.
55

 
SECTION 7.03. Barclays and its Affiliates
56

 
SECTION 7.04. Lender Credit Decision
56

 
SECTION 7.05. Indemnification
56

 
SECTION 7.06. Successor Agent
57

 
 
 
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS
57

 
 
 
 
SECTION 8.01. Amendments, Etc.
57

 
SECTION 8.02. Notices, Etc.
58

 
SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies
60

 
SECTION 8.04. Costs and Expenses
60

 
SECTION 8.05. Right of Set-off
62

 
SECTION 8.06. Binding Effect
62

 
SECTION 8.07. Assignments and Participations
62

 
SECTION 8.08. Confidentiality
66

 
SECTION 8.09. Governing Law
67

 
SECTION 8.10. Severability; Survival
67

 
SECTION 8.11. Execution in Counterparts
68

 
SECTION 8.12. Jurisdiction, Etc
68

 
SECTION 8.13. Waiver of Jury Trial
68

 
SECTION 8.14. USA Patriot Act
69

 
SECTION 8.15. No Fiduciary Duty
69

 
SECTION 8.16. Defaulting Lenders
69

 
SECTION 8.17. Cash Collateral
72

 
SECTION 8.18. Reallocations
73

 
SECTION 8.19. Amendment and Restatement of Existing Credit Agreement
74


ii


EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES
EXHIBIT A
 
Form of Notice of Borrowing
EXHIBIT B
 
Form of Request for Issuance
EXHIBIT C
 
Form of Assignment and Assumption
EXHIBIT D
 
Form of Opinion of Counsel for the Borrower
EXHIBIT E
 
Form of Opinion of Counsel for the Administrative Agent
EXHIBIT F-1
 
Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Lenders
 
 
That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-2
 
Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Participants
 
 
That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-3
 
Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Participants
 
 
That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-4
 
Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Lenders
 
 
That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
 
 
 
 
 
 
SCHEDULE I
 
Schedule of Initial Lenders
SCHEDULE 4.01(m)
 
Schedule of Significant Subsidiaries


iii


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 10, 2014 (this “ Agreement ”), among AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation (the “ Borrower ”), the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signatures pages hereof (the “ Initial Lenders ”), BARCLAYS BANK PLC (“ Barclays ”), as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders (as hereinafter defined), and the LC Issuing Banks (as hereinafter defined).
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT:
The Borrower has requested that the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks agree, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, to amend and restate in its entirety the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013 (the “ Existing Credit Agreement ”), among the Borrower, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, and the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders party thereto. The Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks have indicated their willingness to amend and restate the Existing Credit Agreement on the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree that the Existing Credit Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
    
SECTION 1.01. Certain Defined Terms.

As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined):
Administrative Agent ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Administrative Questionnaire ” means an administrative questionnaire in a form supplied by the Administrative Agent.
Advance ” means an advance by a Lender to a Borrower as part of a Borrowing and refers to a Base Rate Advance or a Eurodollar Rate Advance.
Affiliate ” means, as to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person or is a director or officer of such Person. For purposes of this definition, the term “control” (including the terms “controlling”, “controlled by” and “under common control with”) of a Person means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of




2

the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of Voting Stock, by contract or otherwise.
Agent Parties ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(c).
Agent’s Account ” means the account of the Administrative Agent maintained by the Administrative Agent with Barclays at its office located at 745 7 th Avenue, New York, NY 10019, ABA Number: 026 002 574, Account Name: Clad Control Account, Account No. 050-019104, Reference: American Electric Power, or such other account of the Administrative Agent as the Administrative Agent may from time to time designate in a written notice to the Lenders and the Borrower.
Anti-Corruption Laws ” means all laws, rules, and regulations of any jurisdiction applicable to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries from time to time concerning or relating to bribery, money laundering or corruption.
Applicable Law ” means (i) all applicable common law and principles of equity and (ii) all applicable provisions of all (A) constitutions, statutes, rules, regulations and orders of governmental bodies, (B) Governmental Approvals and (C) orders, decisions, judgments and decrees of all courts (whether at law or in equity or admiralty) and arbitrators.
Applicable Lending Office ” means, with respect to each Lender, such Lender’s Domestic Lending Office in the case of a Base Rate Advance and such Lender’s Eurodollar Lending Office in the case of a Eurodollar Rate Advance.
Applicable Margin ” means, with respect to any Base Rate Advance and any Eurodollar Rate Advance, at all times during which any Applicable Rating Level set forth below is in effect, the rate per annum (except as provided below) for such Type of Advance set forth below next to such Applicable Rating Level:
Applicable
Rating Level
Applicable Margin
for Eurodollar Rate
Advances
Applicable Margin
for Base Rate
Advances
1
1.000%
0.000%
2
1.125%
0.125%
3
1.250%
0.250%
4
1.500%
0.500%
5
1.750%
0.750%
6
2.000%
1.000%

provided , that the Applicable Margins set forth above shall be increased, for each Applicable Rating Level, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default by 2.00% per annum.



3

Any change in the Applicable Margin resulting from a change in the Applicable Rating Level shall become effective upon the date of announcement of any change in the Moody’s Rating or the S&P Rating that results in such change in the Applicable Rating Level.
Applicable Rating Level ” at any time shall be determined in accordance with the then-applicable S&P Rating and the then-applicable Moody’s Rating as follows:
S&P Rating/Moody’s Rating
Applicable Rating Level
S&P Rating A or higher or Moody’s Rating A2 or higher
1
S&P Rating A- or Moody’s Rating A3
2
S&P Rating BBB+ or Moody’s Rating Baa1
3
S&P Rating BBB or Moody’s Rating Baa2
4
S&P Rating BBB- or Moody’s Rating Baa3
5
S&P Rating BB+ or below or Moody’s Rating Ba1 or below, or no S&P Rating or Moody’s Rating
6

The Applicable Rating Level for any day shall be determined based upon the higher of the S&P Rating and the Moody’s Rating in effect on such day. If the S&P Rating and the Moody’s Rating are not the same ( i.e. , a “split rating”), the higher of such ratings shall control, unless either rating is below BBB- or Baa3 (as applicable), in which case the lower of the two ratings shall control.
Approved Fund ” means any Fund that is administered or managed by (i) a Lender, (ii) an Affiliate of a Lender or (iii) an entity or an Affiliate of an entity that administers or manages a Lender.
Assignee Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.18.
Assignment and Assumption ” means an assignment and assumption entered into by a Lender and an Eligible Assignee (with the consent of any party whose consent is required by Section 8.07), and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereto or any other form approved by the Administrative Agent.
Assignor Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.18.
Available Commitment ” means, for each Lender at any time on any day, the unused portion of such Lender’s Commitment, computed after giving effect to all Extensions of Credit made or to be made on such day, the application of proceeds therefrom and all prepayments and repayments of Advances made on such day.
Available Commitments ” means the aggregate of the Lenders’ Available Commitments hereunder.



4

Bankruptcy Event ” means, with respect to any Person, such Person becomes the subject of a proceeding under any Debtor Relief Law, or has had a receiver, custodian, conservator, trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation of its business or assets (including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other Governmental Authority acting in a similar capacity) appointed for it, or, in the good faith determination of the Administrative Agent, has taken any action in furtherance of, or indicating its consent to, approval of, or acquiescence in, any such proceeding or appointment; provided that, a Bankruptcy Event shall not result solely by virtue of any ownership interest, or acquisition of any equity interest, in such Person by a Governmental Authority so long as such ownership interest does not result in or provide such Person with immunity from the jurisdiction of courts within the United States or from the enforcement of judgments or writs of attachment on its assets or permit such Person (or such Governmental Authority) to reject, repudiate, disavow or disaffirm obligations under any agreement in which it commits to extend credit.
Barclays ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Base Rate ” means a fluctuating interest rate per annum in effect from time to time, which rate per annum shall at all times be equal to the highest of the following rates then in effect:
(i)
the rate of interest announced publicly by Barclays in New York City, from time to time, as Barclays’ prime commercial lending rate or corporate base rate;

(ii)
1/2 of 1% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate; and

(iii)
the rate of interest per annum equal to the Eurodollar Rate as determined on such day (or if such day is not a Business Day, on the next preceding Business Day) that would be applicable to a Eurodollar Rate Advance having an Interest Period of one month, plus 1%.

Base Rate Advance ” means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.11(a).
Borrower ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Borrowing ” means a borrowing by the Borrower consisting of simultaneous Advances of the same Type, having the same Interest Period and ratably made or Converted on the same day by each of the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.02 or 2.13, as the case may be. All Advances to the Borrower of the same Type, having the same Interest Period and made or Converted on the same day shall be deemed a single Borrowing hereunder until repaid or next Converted.
Borrowing Date ” means the date of any Borrowing.
BTMU ” means The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.



5

Business Day ” means a day of the year on which banks are not required or authorized by law to close in New York City and, if the applicable Business Day relates to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, Business Day also includes a day on which dealings are carried out in the London interbank market.
Cash Collateralize ” means, to pledge and deposit with or deliver to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of one or more of the LC Issuing Banks or Lenders, as collateral for LC Outstandings or obligations of Lenders to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings, cash or deposit account balances or, if the Administrative Agent and each applicable LC Issuing Bank shall agree in their sole discretion, other credit support, in each case pursuant to documentation in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and each applicable LC Issuing Bank. “ Cash Collateral ” shall have a meaning correlative to the foregoing and shall include the proceeds of such cash collateral and other credit support.
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of this Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any Governmental Authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, implemented, adopted or issued.
Commitment ” means, for each Lender, the obligation of such Lender to make Advances to the Borrower and to acquire participations in Letters of Credit hereunder in an aggregate amount no greater than the amount set forth on Schedule I hereto or, if such Lender has entered into any Assignment and Assumption, set forth for such Lender in the Register maintained by the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 8.07(c), in each such case as such amount may be reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.08.
Commitment Fee Rate ” means, at any time, the rate per annum set forth below next to the Applicable Rating Level in effect at such time:



6

Applicable
Rating Level
Commitment
Fee Rate
1
0.100%
2
0.125%
3
0.175%
4
0.225%
5
0.275%
6
0.350%

A change in the Commitment Fee Rate resulting from a change in the Applicable Rating Level shall become effective upon the date of public announcement of a change in the Moody’s Rating or the S&P Rating that results in a change in the Applicable Rating Level.
Commitment Percentage ” means, as to any Lender as of any date of determination, the percentage describing such Lender’s pro rata share of the Commitments set forth in the Register from time to time; provided that in the case of Section 8.16 when a Defaulting Lender shall exist, “ Commitment Percentage ” means the percentage of the total Commitments (disregarding any Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) represented by such Lender’s Commitment. If the Commitments have terminated or expired, the Commitment Percentages shall be determined based upon the Commitments most recently in effect, giving effect to any assignments and to any Lender’s status as a Defaulting Lender at the time of determination.
Commitments ” means the aggregate of the Lenders’ Commitments hereunder.
Communications ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(b).
Confidential Information ” means information that the Borrower furnishes to the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers or any Lender in a writing designated as confidential, but does not include any such information that is or becomes generally available to the public or that is or becomes available to the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers or such Lender from a source other than the Borrower.
Connection Income Taxes ” means Other Connection Taxes that are imposed on or measured by overall gross receipts or income, or net income (however denominated) or that are franchise Taxes, privilege Taxes, license Taxes or branch profits Taxes.
Consolidated Capital ” means the sum of (i) Consolidated Debt of the Borrower and (ii) the consolidated equity of all classes of stock (whether common, preferred, mandatorily convertible preferred or preference) of the Borrower, in each case determined in accordance with GAAP, but including Equity-Preferred Securities issued by the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries and excluding the funded pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net of tax, components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).



7

Consolidated Debt ” of the Borrower means the total principal amount of all Debt described in clauses (i) through (v) of the definition of Debt and Guaranties of such Debt of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries, excluding, however, (i) Debt of AEP Credit, Inc. that is non-recourse to the Borrower, (ii) Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds, and (iii) Equity-Preferred Securities not to exceed 10% of Consolidated Capital (calculated for purposes of this clause without reference to any Equity-Preferred Securities); provided that Guaranties of Debt included in the total principal amount of Consolidated Debt shall not be added to such total principal amount.
Consolidated Subsidiary ” means, with respect to any Person at any time, any Subsidiary or other Person the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of such first Person in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Tangible Net Assets ” means, on any date of determination and with respect to any Person at any time, the total of all assets (including revaluations thereof as a result of commercial appraisals, price level restatement or otherwise) appearing on the consolidated balance sheet of such Person and its Consolidated Subsidiaries most recently delivered to the Lenders pursuant to Section 5.01(i) as of such date of determination, net of applicable reserves and deductions, but excluding goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents, unamortized debt discount and all other like intangible assets (which term shall not be construed to include such revaluations), less the aggregate of the consolidated current liabilities of such Person and its Consolidated Subsidiaries appearing on such balance sheet.
Convert ”, “ Conversion ” and “ Converted ” each refers to a conversion of Advances of one Type into Advances of the other Type, or the selection of a new, or the renewal of the same, Interest Period for Eurodollar Rate Advances, pursuant to Section 2.12 or 2.13.
Credit Party ” means the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender.
Credit Suisse ” means Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch.
CS Securities ” means Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC.
Debt ” of any Person means, without duplication, (i) all indebtedness of such Person for borrowed money, (ii) all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than trade payables not overdue by more than 60 days incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business), (iii) all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or other similar instruments, (iv) all obligations of such Person as lessee under leases that have been, in accordance with GAAP, recorded as capital leases, including, without limitation, the leases described in clause (iv) of Section 5.02(c), (v) all obligations of such Person in respect of reimbursement agreements with respect to acceptances, letters of credit (other than trade letters of credit) or similar extensions of credit, (vi) all Guaranties and (vii) all reasonably quantifiable obligations under indemnities or under support or capital contribution



8

agreements, and other reasonably quantifiable obligations (contingent or otherwise) to purchase or otherwise to assure a creditor against loss in respect of, or to assure an obligee against loss in respect of, all Debt of others referred to in clauses (i) through (vi) above guaranteed directly or indirectly in any manner by such Person, or in effect guaranteed directly or indirectly by such Person through an agreement (A) to pay or purchase such Debt or to advance or supply funds for the payment or purchase of such Debt, (B) to purchase, sell or lease (as lessee or lessor) property, or to purchase or sell services, primarily for the purpose of enabling the debtor to make payment of such Debt or to assure the holder of such Debt against loss, (C) to supply funds to or in any other manner invest in the debtor (including any agreement to pay for property or services irrespective of whether such property is received or such services are rendered) or (D) otherwise to assure a creditor against loss.
Debtor Relief Laws ” means the Bankruptcy Code of the United States of America, and all other liquidation, conservatorship, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, moratorium, rearrangement, receivership, insolvency, reorganization, or similar debtor relief laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdictions from time to time in effect.
Declining Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.06(b).
Default ” means any Event of Default or any event that would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or time elapse or both.
Defaulting Lender ” means, subject to Section 8.16(b), any Lender that (i) has failed to (A) fund all or any portion of its Advances within two Business Days of the date such Advances were required to be funded hereunder unless such Lender notifies the Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing that such failure is the result of such Lender’s good faith determination that one or more conditions precedent to funding (each of which conditions precedent, together with any applicable Default, shall be specifically identified in such writing) has not been satisfied, or (B) pay to any Credit Party any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder (including in respect of its participation in Letters of Credit) within two Business Days of the date when due, (ii) has notified the Borrower or any Credit Party in writing that it does not intend to comply with its funding obligations hereunder or generally under other agreements in which it commits to extend credit, or has made a public statement to that effect (unless such writing or public statement relates to such Lender’s obligation to fund an Advance hereunder and states that such position is based on such Lender’s good faith determination that a condition precedent to funding (which condition precedent, together with any applicable Default, shall be specifically identified in such writing or public statement) cannot be satisfied), (iii) has failed, within three Business Days after written request by the Administrative Agent or the Borrower, to confirm in writing to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower that it will comply with its prospective funding obligations hereunder ( provided that, such Lender shall cease to be a Defaulting Lender pursuant to this clause (iii) upon receipt of such written confirmation by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower), or (iv) has become the subject of a Bankruptcy Event. Any determination by the Administrative Agent that a Lender is a Defaulting Lender under any one or more of



9

clauses (i) through (iv) above shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error, and such Lender shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender (subject to Section 8.16(b)) upon delivery of written notice of such determination to the Borrower, each LC Issuing Bank, and each Lender.
“Departing Lender” means each “Lender” under the Existing Credit Agreement that is not continuing as an Initial Lender under this Agreement upon the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date.
Designated Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.07(a).
Disclosure Documents ” means the Borrower’s Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Borrower’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC, for the periods ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, and the Borrower’s Current Reports on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC after the date of filing the Borrower’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014 but prior to the date hereof.
Dollars ” and the symbol “$” mean lawful currency of the United States of America.
Domestic Lending Office ” means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its “Domestic Lending Office” on such Lender’s Administrative Questionnaire or in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify in writing to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Eligible Assignee ” means any Person that meets the requirements to be an assignee under Section 8.07(b)(iii), (v) and (vi) (subject to such consents, if any, as may be required under Section 8.07(b)(iii)).
Environmental Action ” means any action, suit, demand, demand letter, claim, notice of non-compliance or violation, notice of liability or potential liability, investigation, proceeding, consent order or consent agreement relating in any way to any Environmental Law, Environmental Permit or Hazardous Materials or arising from alleged injury or threat of injury to health, safety or the environment, including, without limitation, (i) by any Governmental Authority for enforcement, cleanup, removal, response, remedial or other actions or damages and (ii) by any Governmental Authority or any third party for damages, contribution, indemnification, cost recovery, compensation or injunctive relief.
Environmental Law ” means any federal, state, local or foreign statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, order, judgment, decree or judicial or agency interpretation, policy or guidance relating to pollution or protection of the environment, health, safety or natural resources, including, without limitation, those relating to the use, handling, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal, release or discharge of Hazardous Materials.



10

Environmental Permit ” means any permit, approval, identification number, license or other authorization required under any Environmental Law.
Equity-Preferred Securities ” means (i) debt or preferred securities that are mandatorily convertible or mandatorily exchangeable into common shares of the Borrower and (ii) any other securities, however denominated, including but not limited to hybrid capital and trust originated preferred securities, (A) issued by the Borrower or any Consolidated Subsidiary of the Borrower, (B) that are not subject to mandatory redemption or the underlying securities, if any, of which are not subject to mandatory redemption, (C) that are perpetual or mature no less than 30 years from the date of issuance, (D) the indebtedness issued in connection with which, including any guaranty, is subordinate in right of payment to the unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the issuer of such indebtedness or guaranty, and (E) the terms of which permit the deferral of the payment of interest or distributions thereon to a date occurring after the Termination Date.
ERISA ” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder.
ERISA Affiliate ” means, with respect to any Person, each trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that is considered to be a single employer with such entity within the meaning of Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) the Internal Revenue Code.
ERISA Event ” means (i) the termination of or withdrawal from any Plan by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates, (ii) the failure by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates to comply with ERISA or the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to any Plan or (iii) the failure by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries to comply with Applicable Law with respect to any Foreign Plan.
Eurocurrency Liabilities ” has the meaning assigned to that term in Regulation D of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
Eurodollar Lending Office ” means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its “Eurodollar Lending Office” on such Lender’s Administrative Questionnaire or in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender (or, if no such office is specified, its Domestic Lending Office), or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify in writing to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Eurodollar Rate ” means, for any Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance comprising part of the same Borrowing, the London interbank offered rate (rounded upward to the nearest 1/16 th of 1%) as administered by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (or any other Person that takes over the administration of such rate) for deposits in immediately available funds in Dollars for a period equal in length to such Interest Period as displayed on page LIBOR01 of the Reuters screen that displays such rate (or, in the event such rate does not appear on a Reuters page or screen, on any



11

successor or substitute Reuters page or screen that displays such rate, or on the appropriate page or screen of such other comparable information service that publishes such rate from time to time as selected by the Administrative Agent in its discretion) (in each case, the “ Screen Rate ”) at approximately 11:00 A.M. (London time) two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period, provided , that if the Screen Rate shall be less than zero, such rate shall be deemed to be zero for the purposes of this Agreement, and provided, further , if the Screen Rate shall not be available at such time for such Interest Period (an “ Impacted Interest Period ”), the Eurodollar Rate for such Borrowing shall be the Interpolated Rate, provided , that if any Interpolated Rate shall be less than zero, such rate shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
Eurodollar Rate Advance ” means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.11(b).
Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage ” of any Lender for any Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance means the reserve percentage applicable to such Lender during such Interest Period (or if more than one such percentage shall be so applicable, the daily average of such percentages for those days in such Interest Period during which any such percentage shall be so applicable) under regulations issued from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (or any successor) for determining the maximum reserve requirement (including, without limitation, any emergency, supplemental or other marginal reserve requirement) then applicable to such Lender with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities (or with respect to any other category of liabilities that includes deposits by reference to which the interest rate on Eurodollar Rate Advances is determined) having a term equal to such Interest Period.
Events of Default ” has the meaning specified in Section 6.01.
Exchange Act ” has the meaning specified in Section 6.01(f).
Excluded Taxes ” means any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to a Recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to a Recipient, (a) Taxes imposed on or measured by overall gross receipts or income, or net income (however denominated), franchise Taxes, privilege Taxes, license Taxes or branch profits Taxes, in each case, (i) imposed as a result of such Recipient being organized under the laws of, or having its principal office or, in the case of any Lender, its Applicable Lending Office located in, the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (or any political subdivision thereof) or (ii) that are Other Connection Taxes, (b) in the case of a Lender, U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed on amounts payable to or for the account of such Lender with respect to an applicable interest in an Advance or Commitment pursuant to a law in effect on the date on which (i) such Lender acquires such interest in the Advance or Commitment (other than pursuant to an assignment request by the Borrower under Section 2.20(b)) or (ii) such Lender changes its Applicable Lending Office, except in each case to the extent that, pursuant to Section 2.18, amounts with respect to such Taxes were payable either to such Lender’s assignor immediately before such Lender became a party hereto or to such Lender immediately before it changed its Applicable Lending



12

Office, (c) Taxes attributable to such Recipient’s failure to comply with Section 2.18(g) and (d) any U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA.
Existing Credit Agreement ” has the meaning specified in the Preliminary Statement in this Agreement.
Extension Effective Date ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.06(c).
Extension of Credit ” means the making of a Borrowing, the issuance of a Letter of Credit or the amendment of any Letter of Credit having the effect of extending the stated termination date thereof or increasing the maximum amount available to be drawn thereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, a Conversion shall not constitute an Extension of Credit.
FATCA ” means Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Internal Revenue Code, as of the date of this Agreement (or any amended or successor version that is substantively comparable and not materially more onerous to comply with), any current or future regulations or official interpretations thereof, any agreement entered into pursuant to Section 1471(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, and any intergovernmental agreement entered into in connection with such sections of the Internal Revenue Code and any legislation, law, regulation or practice enacted or promulgated pursuant to such intergovernmental agreement.
Federal Funds Rate ” means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal for each day during such period to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the next preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day that is a Business Day, the average of the quotations for such day on such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
Foreign Lender ” means a Lender that is not a U.S. Person.
Foreign Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).
Fronting Exposure ” means, at any time there is a Defaulting Lender, with respect to any LC Issuing Bank, such Defaulting Lender’s Commitment Percentage of the LC Outstandings with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank, other than LC Outstandings as to which such Defaulting Lender’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Lenders or Cash Collateralized in accordance with the terms hereof.
Fund ” means any Person (other than a natural Person) that is (or will be) engaged in making, purchasing, holding or otherwise investing in commercial loans, bonds and similar extensions of credit in the ordinary course of its activities.
GAAP ” has the meaning specified in Section 1.03.



13

GenCo ” means AEP Generation Resources Inc.
Governmental Approval ” means any authorization, consent, approval, license or exemption of, registration or filing with, or report or notice to, any Governmental Authority.
Governmental Authority ” means the government of the United States of America or any other nation, or of any political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra-national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank).
Guaranty ” of any Person means any obligation, contingent or otherwise, of such Person (i) to pay any Debt of any other Person or (ii) incurred in connection with the issuance by a third person of a Guaranty of Debt of any other Person (whether such obligation arises by agreement to reimburse or indemnify such third Person or otherwise).
Hazardous Materials ” means (i) petroleum and petroleum products, byproducts or breakdown products, radioactive materials, asbestos-containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls and radon gas and (ii) any other chemicals, materials or substances designated, classified or regulated as hazardous or toxic or as a pollutant or contaminant under any Environmental Law.
“Impacted Interest Period” has the meaning specified for such term in the definition herein of “Eurodollar Rate.”
Indemnified Party ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.04(b).
Indemnified Taxes ” means (a) Taxes, other than Excluded Taxes, imposed on or with respect to any payment made by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document and (b) to the extent not otherwise described in (a), Other Taxes.
Initial Lenders ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Interest Period ” means, for each Eurodollar Rate Advance comprising part of the same Borrowing, the period commencing on the date of such Eurodollar Rate Advance or the date of the Conversion of any Base Rate Advance into such Eurodollar Rate Advance and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below and, thereafter, with respect to Eurodollar Rate Advances, each subsequent period commencing on the last day of the immediately preceding Interest Period and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below. The duration of each such Interest Period shall be one, two, three or six months (or, for any Borrowing, any period specified by the Borrower that is shorter than one month, if all Lenders agree), as the Borrower may, upon notice received by the



14

Administrative Agent not later than 11:00 A.M. on the third Business Day prior to the first day of such Interest Period, select; provided, however, that:
(i)
the Borrower may not select any Interest Period that ends after the Termination Date of any Lender;
(ii)
Interest Periods commencing on the same date for Eurodollar Rate Advances comprising part of the same Borrowing shall be of the same duration;
(iii)
whenever the last day of any Interest Period would otherwise occur on a day other than a Business Day, the last day of such Interest Period shall be extended to occur on the next succeeding Business Day, provided, however, that, if such extension would cause the last day of such Interest Period to occur in the next following calendar month, the last day of such Interest Period shall occur on the next preceding Business Day; and
(iv)
whenever the first day of any Interest Period occurs on a day of an initial calendar month for which there is no numerically corresponding day in the calendar month that succeeds such initial calendar month by the number of months equal to the number of months in such Interest Period, such Interest Period shall end on the last Business Day of such succeeding calendar month.

Internal Revenue Code ” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder.

“Interpolated Rate” means, at any time, for any Interest Period, the rate per annum (rounded upward to the nearest 1/16 th of 1%) determined by the Administrative Agent (which determination shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error) to be equal to the rate that results from interpolating on a linear basis between: (a) the Screen Rate for the longest period for which the Screen Rate is available for the Eurodollar Rate Advance that is shorter than the Impacted Interest Period; and (b) the Screen Rate for the shortest period for which the Screen Rate is available for the Eurodollar Rate Advance that exceeds the Impacted Interest Period, in each case, at such time.

IRS ” means the United States Internal Revenue Service.

Joint Lead Arrangers ” means Barclays, CS Securities, BTMU and Wells Securities.

LC Collateral Account ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(b).

LC Fee ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.05(c).

LC Issuing Bank ” means, as to any Letter of Credit, Barclays, BTMU, Credit Suisse, Wells Fargo, and any Lender or Affiliate of a Lender that shall agree to issue a Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 2.04.



15

LC Outstandings ” means, on any date of determination, the sum of (i) the undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date plus (ii) the aggregate principal amount of all unpaid reimbursement obligations of the Borrower on such date with respect to payments made by any LC Issuing Bank under any Letter of Credit (excluding reimbursement obligations that have been repaid with the proceeds of any Borrowing).
LC Payment Notice ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(e).
Lenders ” means, at any time, collectively, (i) the Initial Lenders (other than any such Initial Lenders that have previously assigned all of their respective Advances and Commitments to other Persons in accordance with Section 8.07(b) at such time), and (ii) any other Persons that have become Lenders holding Advances and/or Commitments at such time in accordance with Section 8.07(b).
Letter of Credit ” means any standby letters of credit issued by an LC Issuing Bank pursuant to Section 2.04.
Lien ” means any lien, security interest or other charge or encumbrance of any kind, or any other type of preferential arrangement, including, without limitation, the lien or retained security title of a conditional vendor and any easement, right of way or other encumbrance on title to real property.
Loan Documents ” means, collectively, (i) the Commitment Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, Barclays, CS Securities, Credit Suisse, BTMU, Wells Securities and Wells Fargo, (ii) the Fee Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, Barclays, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (iii) the Fee Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., CS Securities, Credit Suisse, KeyBank National Association, RBS Securities Inc., The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, BTMU, Wells Securities and Wells Fargo, (iv) the Fee Letter, dated as of June 21, 2011, between the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, (v) this Agreement and (vi) each promissory note issued pursuant to Section 2.10(d), in each case, as any of the foregoing may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.
Margin Regulations ” means Regulations T, U and X of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
Margin Stock ” has the meaning specified in the Margin Regulations.
Material Adverse Change ” means any material adverse change (i) in the business, condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) that is reasonably likely to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement against the Borrower or the ability of the Borrower to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
Material Adverse Effect ” means a material adverse effect (i) on the business, condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries,



16

taken as a whole, or (ii) that is reasonably likely to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement against the Borrower or the ability of the Borrower to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
Minimum Collateral Amount ” means, at any time, (i) with respect to Cash Collateral consisting of cash or deposit account balances, an amount equal to 103% of the Fronting Exposure of all LC Issuing Banks with respect to Letters of Credit issued and outstanding at such time and (ii) otherwise, an amount determined by the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks in their reasonable discretion.
Moody’s ” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Moody’s Rating ” means, on any date of determination, the debt rating most recently announced by Moody’s with respect to the long-term senior unsecured debt issued by the Borrower.
Multiemployer Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).
Non-Consenting Lender ” means any Lender that does not approve any consent, waiver or amendment that (i) requires the approval of all Lenders in accordance with the terms of Section 8.01 and (ii) has been approved by the Required Lenders.
Non-Defaulting Lender ” means, at any time, each Lender that is not a Defaulting Lender at such time.
non-performing Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(f).
Notice of Borrowing ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.02(a).
Other Connection Taxes ” means, with respect to any Recipient, Taxes imposed as a result of a present or former connection between such Recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (other than connections arising from such Recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any Loan Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Advance, Commitment or Loan Document).
Other Taxes ” means all present or future stamp, court or documentary, intangible, recording, filing or similar Taxes that arise from any payment made under, from the execution, delivery, performance, enforcement or registration of, from the receipt or perfection of a security interest under, or otherwise with respect to, any Loan Document, except any such Taxes that are Other Connection Taxes imposed with respect to an assignment (other than an assignment made pursuant to Section 2.20(b)).
Outstanding Credits ” means, on any date of determination, the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all Advances outstanding on such date plus (ii) the LC Outstandings on such date.



17

Parent ” means, with respect to any Lender, any Person as to which such Lender is, directly or indirectly, a subsidiary.
Participant ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(d).
Participant Register ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(d).
Patriot Act ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.14.
Permitted Liens ” means such of the following as to which no enforcement, collection, execution, levy or foreclosure proceeding shall have been commenced: (i) Liens for taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies to the extent not required to be paid under Section 5.01(g) hereof; (ii) Liens imposed by law, such as materialmen’s, mechanics’, carriers’, workmen’s and repairmen’s Liens, and other similar Liens arising in the ordinary course of business securing obligations that are not overdue for a period of more than 30 days or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings; (iii) Liens incurred or deposits made to secure obligations under workers’ compensation laws or similar legislation or to secure public or statutory obligations; (iv) easements, rights of way and other encumbrances on title to real property that do not render title to the property encumbered thereby unmarketable or materially adversely affect the use of such property for its present purposes; (v) any judgment Lien, unless an Event of Default under Section 6.01(g) shall have occurred and be continuing; (vi) any Lien on any asset of any Person existing at the time such Person is merged or consolidated with or into the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary and not created in contemplation of such event; (vii) deposits made in the ordinary course of business to secure the performance of bids, trade contracts (other than for Debt), operating leases and surety bonds; (viii) Liens upon or in any real property or equipment acquired, constructed, improved or held by the Borrower or any Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business to secure the purchase price of such property or equipment or to secure Debt incurred solely for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction or improvement of such property or equipment, or Liens existing on such property or equipment at the time of its acquisition (other than any such Liens created in contemplation of such acquisition that were not incurred to finance the acquisition of such property); (ix) extensions, renewals or replacements of any Lien described in clause (iii), (vi), (vii) or (viii) for the same or a lesser amount, provided, however, that no such Lien shall extend to or cover any properties not theretofore subject to the Lien being extended, renewed or replaced; and (x) any other Lien not covered by the foregoing exceptions as long as immediately after the creation of such Lien the aggregate principal amount of Debt secured by all Liens created or assumed under this clause (x) does not exceed 10% of Consolidated Tangible Net Assets of the Borrower.
Person ” means an individual, partnership, corporation (including a business trust), joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity, or a government or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).



18

Platform ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(b).
Proposed Increased Commitment ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.07(a).
Recipient ” means (a) the Administrative Agent, (b) any Lender and (c) any LC Issuing Bank, as applicable.
Register ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(c).
Related Parties ” means, with respect to any Person, such Person’s Affiliates and the partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, trustees, administrators, managers, advisors and representatives of such Person and of such Person’s Affiliates.
Request for Issuance ” means a request made pursuant to Section 2.04 in the form of Exhibit B.
Required Lenders ” means at any time Lenders owed in excess of 50% of the Outstanding Credits at such time, or, if there are no Outstanding Credits, Lenders having in excess of 50% in interest of the Commitments in effect at such time. Subject to Section 8.01, the Outstanding Credits and Commitments of any Defaulting Lender shall be disregarded in determining Required Lenders at any time.
“Restatement Effective Date” has the meaning specified in Section 3.1.
Restructuring Law ” means Texas Senate Bill 7, as enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas and signed into law on June 18, 1999, Ohio Senate Bill No. 3, as enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio and signed into law on July 6, 1999, or any similar law applicable to the Borrower or any Subsidiary of the Borrower governing the deregulation or restructuring of the electric power industry.
RTO Transaction ” means the transfer of transmission facilities to a regional transmission organization or equivalent organization as approved or ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
S&P ” means Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
S&P Rating ” means, on any date of determination, the rating most recently announced by S&P with respect to the long-term senior unsecured debt issued by the Borrower.
Sanctions ” means economic or financial sanctions or trade embargoes imposed, administered or enforced from time to time by (a) the U.S. government, including those administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury or by the U.S. Department of State, or (b) the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, any EU member state, or Her Majesty’s Treasury of the United Kingdom.



19

Sanctioned Country ” means, at any time of determination, a country or territory which is the subject or target of any Sanctions.
Sanctioned Person ” means, at any time of determination, (a) any Person listed in any Sanctions-related list of designated Persons maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or any EU member state, (b) any Person operating, organized or resident in a Sanctioned Country, (c) any Person owned or controlled by or acting on behalf of any such Person described in the preceding clause (a) or (b), or (d) any Person with which, to the Borrower’s actual knowledge, any Lender is prohibited under Sanctions relevant to it from dealing or engaging in transactions. For purposes of the foregoing, control of a Person shall be deemed to include where a Sanctioned Person (i) owns or has power to vote 25% or more of the issued and outstanding equity interests having ordinary voting power for the election of directors of the Person or other individuals performing similar functions for the Person, or (ii) has the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Person, whether by ownership of equity interests, contracts or otherwise.
SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Significant Subsidiary ” means, at any time, any Subsidiary of the Borrower that constitutes at such time a “significant subsidiary” of the Borrower, as such term is defined in Regulation S-X of the SEC as in effect on the date hereof (17 C.F.R. Part 210) (other than GenCo and any other Subsidiary of the Borrower (other than the Existing Utility Subsidiaries (as defined below)) to which generation assets are being transferred in connection with the corporate separation of Ohio Power Company’s generation assets); provided , however , that if GenCo and the other Subsidiaries of the Borrower (excluding, solely for purposes of this calculation, the Existing Utility Subsidiaries) own, on an aggregate basis, generation assets exceeding 20% of the Borrower’s “total assets” as used in Regulation S-X, GenCo and each such Subsidiary that otherwise constitutes a “significant subsidiary” of the Borrower under Regulation S-X will be considered Significant Subsidiaries, and provided , further , that “total assets” as used in Regulation S-X shall not include securitization transition assets, phase-in cost assets or similar assets on the balance sheet of any Subsidiary resulting from the issuance of transition bonds or other asset backed securities of a similar nature. As used in this definition, “ Existing Utility Subsidiaries ” means each of AEP Generating Company, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power Company, Wheeling Power Company, AEP Texas North Company and AEP Texas Central Company.
Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds ” means securities, however denominated, that are issued by the Borrower or any Consolidated Subsidiary of the Borrower that are (i) non-recourse to the Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries (other than for failure to collect and pay over the charges referred to in clause (ii) below) and (ii) payable solely from transition or similar charges authorized by law (including, without limitation, any



20

“financing order”, as such term is defined in the Texas Utilities Code) to be invoiced to customers of any Subsidiary of the Borrower or to retail electric providers.
Subsidiary ” of any Person means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust or estate of which (or in which) more than 50% of (i) the issued and outstanding capital stock having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of directors of such corporation (irrespective of whether at the time capital stock of any other class or classes of such corporation shall or might have voting power upon the occurrence of any contingency), (ii) the interest in the capital or profits of such limited liability company, partnership or joint venture or (iii) the beneficial interest in such trust or estate is at the time directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person, by such Person and one or more of its other Subsidiaries or by one or more of such Person’s other Subsidiaries.
Taxes ” means all present or future taxes, levies, imposts, duties, deductions, withholdings (including backup withholding), assessments, fees or other charges imposed by any Governmental Authority, including any interest, additions to tax or penalties applicable thereto.
Termination Date ” means the earlier to occur of (i) July 26, 2018 or such later date that may be established for any Lender from time to time pursuant to Section 2.06 hereof, and (ii) the date of termination in whole of the Commitments available to the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.08 or 6.01.
Type ” refers to the distinction between Advances bearing interest at the Base Rate and Advances bearing interest at the Eurodollar Rate.
U.S. Person ” means any Person that is a “United States Person” as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Internal Revenue Code.
U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.18(g)(ii)(B)(iii).
Voting Stock ” means capital stock issued by a corporation, or equivalent interests in any other Person, the holders of which are ordinarily, in the absence of contingencies, entitled to vote for the election of directors (or Persons performing similar functions) of such Person, even if the right so to vote has been suspended by the happening of such a contingency.
Wells Fargo ” means Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
Wells Securities ” means Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.
Withholding Agent ” means the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.



21

SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods.

In this Agreement in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word “from” means “from and including” and the words “to” and “until” each mean “to but excluding”.
SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms.

All accounting terms not specifically defined herein shall be construed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(f) (“ GAAP ”).
SECTION 1.04. Other Interpretive Provisions.

As used herein, except as otherwise specified herein, (i) references to any Person include its successors and assigns and, in the case of any Governmental Authority, any Person succeeding to its functions and capacities; (ii) references to any Applicable Law include amendments, supplements and successors thereto; (iii) references to specific sections, articles, annexes, schedules and exhibits are to this Agreement; (iv) words importing any gender include the other gender; (v) the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular; (vi) the words “including”, “include” and “includes” shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation”; (vii) captions and headings are for ease of reference only and shall not affect the construction hereof; and (viii) references to any time of day shall be to New York City time unless otherwise specified.
ARTICLE II
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES

SECTION 2.01. The Advances.

(a) Each Lender severally agrees, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, to make Advances to the Borrower and to participate in Letters of Credit from time to time on any Business Day during the period from the date hereof until the Termination Date in an aggregate outstanding amount not to exceed at any time such Lender’s Available Commitment at such time. Within the limits of each Lender’s Commitment and as hereinabove and hereinafter provided, the Borrower may request Borrowings hereunder, and repay or prepay Advances pursuant to Section 2.14 and utilize the resulting increase in the Available Commitments for further Borrowings in accordance with the terms hereof.

(b) In no event shall the Borrower be entitled to request or receive any Borrowing that would cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits (including such requested Borrowing) to exceed the Commitments.

SECTION 2.02. Making the Advances.

(a) Each Borrowing shall be in an amount not less than $10,000,000 (or, if less, the Available Commitments at such time) or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and shall consist of Advances of the same Type made on the same day by the Lenders ratably



22

according to their respective Commitment Percentages. Each Borrowing shall be made on notice, given not later than 11:00 A.M. on the third Business Day prior to the date of the proposed Borrowing in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Eurodollar Rate Advances, or not later than 1:00 P.M. on the date of the proposed Borrowing in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Base Rate Advances, by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, which shall give to each Lender prompt written notice. Each such notice of a Borrowing under this Section 2.02 (a “ Notice of Borrowing ”) shall be by telephone, confirmed immediately in writing, or fax in substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto, specifying therein the requested (i) Borrowing Date for such Borrowing, (ii) Type of Advances comprising such Borrowing, (iii) aggregate amount of such Borrowing, and (iv) in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Eurodollar Rate Advances, the initial Interest Period for each such Advance. Each Lender shall, before 3:00 P.M. on the applicable Borrowing Date, make available for the account of its Applicable Lending Office to the Administrative Agent at the Agent’s Account, in same day funds, such Lender’s ratable portion of the Borrowing to be made on such Borrowing Date. After the Administrative Agent’s receipt of such funds and upon fulfillment of the applicable conditions set forth in Article III, the Administrative Agent will promptly make such funds available to the Borrower in such manner as the Borrower shall have specified in the applicable Notice of Borrowing and as shall be reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent.

(b) Anything in subsection (a) above to the contrary notwithstanding, (i) the Borrower may not select Eurodollar Rate Advances for any Borrowing if the aggregate amount of such Borrowing is less than $10,000,000 or if the obligation of the Lenders to make Eurodollar Rate Advances shall then be suspended pursuant to Section 2.12(b), 2.12(e) or 2.16, and (ii) there shall be not more than 20 Borrowings at any one time outstanding.

(c) Each Notice of Borrowing shall be irrevocable and binding on the Borrower. In the case of any Borrowing that the related Notice of Borrowing specifies is to comprise Eurodollar Rate Advances, the Borrower shall indemnify each Lender against any loss, cost or expense incurred by such Lender as a result of any failure to fulfill on or before the date specified in such Notice of Borrowing for such Borrowing the applicable conditions set forth in Article III, including, without limitation, any loss (including loss of anticipated profits), cost or expense incurred by reason of the liquidation or reemployment of deposits or other funds acquired by such Lender to fund the Advance to be made by such Lender as part of such Borrowing when such Advance, as a result of such failure, is not made on such date.

(d) Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice by courier or fax from a Lender prior to any Borrowing Date or, in the case of a Base Rate Advance, prior to the time of Borrowing, that such Lender will not make available to the Administrative Agent such Lender’s Advance as part of the Borrowing to be made on such Borrowing Date, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Lender has made such portion available to the Administrative Agent on such Borrowing Date in accordance with subsection (a) of this Section 2.02, and the Administrative Agent may (but it shall not be required to), in reliance upon such assumption, make available to the Borrower on such date a corresponding amount. If and to the extent that such Lender shall not have so made such Advance available to the Administrative Agent, such Lender and the Borrower severally agree to repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such corresponding amount, together with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is made available to the Borrower until the date such amount is repaid to the



23

Administrative Agent, at (i) in the case of the Borrower, the interest rate applicable at the time to Advances comprising such Borrowing and (ii) in the case of such Lender, the Federal Funds Rate. If such Lender shall repay to the Administrative Agent such corresponding amount, such amount so repaid shall constitute such Lender’s Advance as part of such Borrowing for purposes of this Agreement.

(e) The failure of any Lender to make the Advance to be made by it as part of any Borrowing shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation, if any, hereunder to make its Advance on the date of such Borrowing, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender to make the Advance to be made by such other Lender on the date of any Borrowing.

SECTION 2.03. [Reserved].

SECTION 2.04. Letters of Credit.

(a) Each of Barclays, Wells Fargo, BTMU and Credit Suisse has severally agreed to act as an LC Issuing Bank and, in such capacity, each has severally agreed to issue Letters of Credit having an aggregate face amount not greater than $75,000,000 for each such LC Issuing Bank. The Borrower may also from time to time appoint one or more Lenders (with the consent of any such Lender, which consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of each Lender) to act, either directly or through an Affiliate of such Lender, as an LC Issuing Bank hereunder. Any such appointment and the terms thereof shall be evidenced in a separate written agreement executed by the Borrower and the relevant LC Issuing Bank, a copy of which agreement shall be delivered by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent shall give prompt notice of any such appointment to the other Lenders. Upon such appointment, if and for so long as such Lender shall have any obligation to issue any Letters of Credit hereunder or any Letter of Credit issued by such Lender shall remain outstanding, such Lender shall be deemed to be, and shall have all the rights and obligations of, an “LC Issuing Bank” under this Agreement.

(b) Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, each Letter of Credit shall be issued (or the stated maturity thereof extended or terms thereof modified or amended) on not less than two Business Days’ prior notice thereof by delivery of a Request for Issuance to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly distribute copies thereof to the Lenders) and the relevant LC Issuing Bank for the account of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries; provided that the Borrower shall be the account party for the purposes of this Agreement and shall have the reimbursement obligations with respect thereto. Each Letter of Credit shall be issued in a form acceptable to the LC Issuing Bank. Each Request for Issuance shall specify (i) the identity of the relevant LC Issuing Bank, (ii) the date (which shall be a Business Day) of issuance of such Letter of Credit (or the date of effectiveness of such extension, modification or amendment) and the stated expiry date thereof (which shall be not more than one year after the date of issuance, provided , that if the expiry date of such Letter of Credit is later than the Termination Date of any Lender, the Borrower will no later than (x) five Business Days prior to such Termination Date if the Borrower’s Applicable Rating Level is 5 or above and (y) 15 days prior to such Termination Date if the Borrower’s Applicable Rating Level is 6, deposit in an account designated with the Administrative Agent (the “ LC Collateral Account ”), in the name of the Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the applicable Lenders and the applicable LC Issuing Banks, in same day



24

funds, an amount equal to the product of (A) 1.03 times the aggregate undrawn stated amount of such Letter of Credit and (B) the Commitment Percentage of the Commitments expiring on such Termination Date), (iii) the proposed stated amount of such Letter of Credit (which amount shall not (A) be less than $100,000 and (B) be subject to any automatic increase provisions), (iv) the name and address of the beneficiary of such Letter of Credit and (v) a statement of drawing conditions applicable to such Letter of Credit, and if such Request for Issuance relates to an amendment or modification of a Letter of Credit, it shall be accompanied by the consent of the beneficiary of the Letter of Credit thereto. Each Request for Issuance shall be irrevocable unless modified or rescinded by the Borrower not less than two days prior to the proposed date of issuance (or effectiveness) specified therein. Not later than 12:00 noon on the proposed date of issuance (or effectiveness) specified in such Request for Issuance, and upon fulfillment of the applicable conditions precedent and the other requirements set forth herein, the relevant LC Issuing Bank shall issue (or extend, amend or modify) such Letter of Credit and provide notice and a copy thereof to the Administrative Agent, which shall, upon request by a Lender, promptly furnish copies thereof to such Lender; provided that the LC Issuing Bank shall not issue or amend any Letter of Credit if such LC Issuing Bank has received notice from the Administrative Agent that the applicable conditions precedent have not been satisfied.

(c) No Letter of Credit shall be requested or issued hereunder if, after the issuance thereof, (i) the Outstanding Credits would exceed the aggregate Commitments, or (ii) the LC Outstandings would exceed $600,000,000.

(d) The Borrower hereby agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each LC Issuing Bank and, if they shall have purchased participations in the reimbursement obligations of the Borrower pursuant to subsection (e) below, the participating Lenders, on each date on which such LC Issuing Bank shall pay any amount under any Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank, a sum equal to the amount so paid plus interest on such amount from the date so paid by such LC Issuing Bank until repayment to such LC Issuing Bank in full at a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal to the interest rate applicable to Base Rate Advances plus 2%. The Borrower may reimburse drawings under a Letter of Credit with an Advance. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the obligations with respect to Letters of Credit of (i) the Borrower shall survive any Termination Date and shall remain in effect until no Letters of Credit remain outstanding, (ii) each Lender shall survive to the extent that the Borrower shall fail to deposit cash collateral in the LC Collateral Account as required under subsection (b) above and (iii) each Lender shall be reinstated, to the extent any such cash collateral, the application thereof or the reimbursement in respect thereof is required to be returned to the Borrower by any LC Issuing Bank after such Termination Date.

(e) If any LC Issuing Bank shall not have been reimbursed in full for any payment made by such LC Issuing Bank under a Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank on the date of such payment, such LC Issuing Bank may give the Administrative Agent and each Lender prompt notice thereof (an “ LC Payment Notice ”) no later than 12:00 noon on any Business Day on or after the Business Day immediately succeeding the date of such payment by such LC Issuing Bank. Each Lender severally agrees to purchase a participation in the reimbursement obligation of the Borrower to such LC Issuing Bank by paying to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank an amount equal to such Lender’s Commitment Percentage of such unreimbursed amount paid by such LC Issuing Bank, plus



25

interest on such amount at a rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate from the date of the payment by such LC Issuing Bank to the date of payment to such LC Issuing Bank by such Lender. Each such payment by a Lender shall be made not later than 3:00 P.M. on the later to occur of (i) the Business Day immediately following the date of such payment by such LC Issuing Bank and (ii) the Business Day on which such Lender shall have received an LC Payment Notice from such LC Issuing Bank. Each Lender’s obligation to make each such payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank shall be several and shall not be affected by the occurrence or continuance of a Default or the failure of any other Lender to make any payment under this Section 2.04(e). Each Lender further agrees that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever.

(f) The failure of any Lender to make any payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of any LC Issuing Bank in accordance with subsection (e) above shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation to make payment, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender. If any Lender (a “ non-performing Lender ”) shall fail to make any payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of any LC Issuing Bank in accordance with subsection (e) above within five Business Days after the LC Payment Notice relating thereto, then, for so long as such failure shall continue, such LC Issuing Bank shall be deemed, for purposes of Sections 6.01 and 8.01 hereof, to be a Lender owed a Borrowing in an amount equal to the outstanding principal amount due and payable by such non-performing Lender to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank pursuant to subsection (e) above. Any non-performing Lender and the Borrower (without waiving any claim against such Lender for such Lender’s failure to purchase a participation in the reimbursement obligations of the Borrower under subsection (e) above) severally agree to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank forthwith on demand such amount, together with interest thereon for each day from the date such Lender would have purchased its participation had it complied with the requirements of subsection (e) above until the date such amount is paid to the Administrative Agent at (i) in the case of the Borrower, the interest rate applicable at the time to Base Rate Advances plus 2%, in accordance with Section 2.04(d), and (ii) in the case of such Lender, the Federal Funds Rate.

(g) The payment obligations of each Lender under Section 2.04(e) and of the Borrower under this Agreement in respect of any payment under any Letter of Credit shall be unconditional and irrevocable, and shall be paid strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement under all circumstances, including, without limitation, the following circumstances:

(i) any lack of validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any other agreement or instrument relating thereto or to such Letter of Credit;

(ii) any amendment or waiver of, or any consent to departure from, the terms of this Agreement or such Letter of Credit;

(iii) the existence of any claim, set-off, defense or other right that the Borrower may have at any time against any beneficiary, or any transferee, of such Letter of Credit (or any Persons for whom any such beneficiary or any such transferee may be acting), any LC Issuing Bank, or any other Person, whether in connection with this Agreement,



26

the transactions contemplated hereby, thereby or by such Letter of Credit, or any unrelated transaction;

(iv) any statement or any other document presented under such Letter of Credit proving to be forged, fraudulent, invalid or insufficient in any respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect;

(v) payment in good faith by any LC Issuing Bank under the Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank against presentation of a draft or certificate that does not comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit;

(vi) the use that may be made of any Letter of Credit by, or any act or omission of, the beneficiary of any Letter of Credit (or any Person for which the beneficiary may be acting); or

(vii) any other circumstance or happening whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing.

(h) Without limiting any other provision of this Section 2.04, for purposes of this Section 2.04 any LC Issuing Bank may rely upon any oral, telephonic, telegraphic, facsimile, electronic, written or other communication believed in good faith to have been authorized by the Borrower, whether or not given or signed by an authorized Person of the Borrower.

(i) The Borrower assumes all risks of the acts and omissions of any beneficiary or transferee of any Letter of Credit. Neither any LC Issuing Bank, the Lenders nor any of their respective officers, directors, employees, agents or Affiliates shall be liable or responsible for (i) the use that may be made of such Letter of Credit or any acts or omissions of any beneficiary or transferee thereof in connection therewith; (ii) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents, or of any endorsement thereon, even if such documents should prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; (iii) payment by any LC Issuing Bank against presentation of documents that do not comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit, including failure of any documents to bear any reference or adequate reference to such Letter of Credit; or (iv) any other circumstances whatsoever in making or failing to make payment under such Letter of Credit, except that the Borrower and each Lender shall have the right to bring suit against each LC Issuing Bank, and each LC Issuing Bank shall be liable to the Borrower and any Lender, to the extent of any direct, as opposed to consequential, damages suffered by the Borrower or such Lender that the Borrower or such Lender proves were caused by such LC Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence, including, in the case of the Borrower, such LC Issuing Bank’s willful failure to make timely payment under such Letter of Credit following the presentation to it by the beneficiary thereof of a draft and accompanying certificate(s) that strictly comply with the terms and conditions of such Letter of Credit. In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each LC Issuing Bank may accept sight drafts and accompanying certificates presented under the Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank that appear on their face to be in order, without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or information to the contrary, and payment against such documents shall not constitute willful misconduct or gross negligence by such LC Issuing Bank.




27

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Lender shall be obligated to indemnify the Borrower for damages caused by any LC Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence.

SECTION 2.05. Fees.

(a) The Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender a commitment fee equal to the Commitment Fee Rate in effect from time to time, multiplied by the amount of such Lender’s Available Commitment (i) from the date hereof, in the case of each Initial Lender, and (ii) from the effective date specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, in the case of each other Lender, in each case until the Termination Date of such Lender, payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September and December, commencing December 31, 2014, and ending on the Termination Date of such Lender.

(b) The Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent such fees as may from time to time be agreed between the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.

(c) The Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender a fee (the “ LC Fee ”) on the average daily aggregate principal amount of each such Lender’s Commitment Percentage of the LC Outstandings (i) from the date hereof, in the case of each Initial Lender, and (ii) from the effective date specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, in the case of each other Lender, in each case until the later to occur of (x) the Termination Date of such Lender, and (y) the date on which no Letters of Credit in which such Lender is obligated to participate are outstanding, payable on the last day of each March, June, September and December (commencing on December 31, 2014), and on such later date, at a rate equal at all times to the Applicable Margin in effect from time to time for Eurodollar Rate Advances.

(d) The Borrower shall pay to each LC Issuing Bank fronting and other fees for the issuance and maintenance of Letters of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank and for drawings thereunder as may be separately agreed between the Borrower and such LC Issuing Bank.

SECTION 2.06 Extension of the Termination Date.

(a) Not earlier than 60 days prior to, nor later than 30 days prior to each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of this Agreement, the Borrower may request by notice made to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly notify the Lenders thereof) a one-year extension of the Termination Date. Each Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent by the date specified by the Administrative Agent (which date shall be a Business Day and shall not be less than 15 days prior to, nor more than 30 days prior to, the Extension Effective Date) that either (A) such Lender declines to consent to extending the Termination Date or (B) such Lender consents to extending the Termination Date. Any Lender not responding within the above time period shall be deemed not to have consented to extending the Termination Date. The Administrative Agent shall, after receiving the notifications from all of the Lenders or the expiration of such period, whichever is earlier, notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the results thereof. The Borrower may request no more than two extensions pursuant to this Section.




28

(b) If any Lender declines, or is deemed to have declined, to consent to such request for extension (each a “ Declining Lender ”), the Borrower shall have the right to replace such Declining Lender in accordance with Section 2.20(b). Any Lender replacing a Declining Lender shall be deemed to have consented to such request for extension (regardless of when such replacement is effective) and shall not be deemed to be a Declining Lender.

(c) If the Required Lenders have consented to the extension of the Termination Date, the Termination Date shall be extended (solely with respect each Lender that consented to the extension) to the date that is one year after the then-effective Termination Date, effective as of the date to be determined by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower (the “ Extension Effective Date ”). On or prior to the Extension Effective Date, the Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent, in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, (i) the resolutions of the Borrower authorizing such extension, certified as being in effect as of the Extension Effective Date and the related incumbency certificate of the Borrower, (ii) a favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), as to such matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request and (iii) a certificate of the Borrower stating that on and as of such Extension Effective Date, and after giving effect to the extension to be effective on such date, all conditions precedent to an Extension of Credit are satisfied. On each Extension Effective Date, the Declining Lender shall have received payment in full of the principal amount of all Advances outstanding owing to such Declining Lender and all interest thereon and all fees and other amounts (including, without limitation, any amounts payable pursuant to Section 8.04(c)) payable to such Declining Lender accrued through such Extension Effective Date. Promptly following such Extension Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall distribute an amended Schedule I to this Agreement (which shall thereafter be incorporated into this Agreement) to reflect any changes in the Lenders, the Commitments and each Lender’s Commitment Percentage as of such Extension Effective Date.

(d) Each LC Issuing Bank may, in its sole discretion, elect not to serve in such capacity following any extension of the Termination Date; provided that, (i) the Borrower and the Administrative Agent may appoint a replacement for such resigning LC Issuing Bank, and (ii) whether such replacement is found shall not otherwise affect the extension of the Termination Date.

SECTION 2.07. Increase of the Commitments.

(a) The Borrower may, from time to time, provided that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, request by notice to the Administrative Agent, to increase the Commitments in minimum increments of $10,000,000, up to a maximum increase aggregate amount (for all such increases) of $500,000,000, by designating one or more Eligible Assignees (each a “ Designated Lender ”) that agree to accept all or a portion of such additional Commitments (the “ Proposed Increased Commitment ”), provided , that (i) if a Designated Lender is not a Lender, such Designated Lender shall be reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank, and such Designated Lender’s Proposed Increased Commitment shall be at least $5,000,000; and (ii) if Designated Lender is a Lender, such Designated Lender shall be reasonably acceptable to each LC Issuing Bank, and allocations of the Proposed Increased Commitment among Designated Lenders that are Lenders shall be



29

based on the ratio of each existing Lender’s Proposed Increased Commitment, if any, to the aggregate of all Proposed Increased Commitments. The Borrower may elect to remove or replace any such designated Eligible Assignee at any time prior to the effective date of such increase, provided that any newly designated Eligible Assignee is reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank.

(b) The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Designated Lenders of the Proposed Increased Commitment. Each Designated Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent by the date specified by the Administrative Agent (which date shall be a Business Day) that either (A) such Designated Lender declines to accept its additional Commitments or (B) such Designated Lender consents to accept its additional Commitments. Any Designated Lender not responding on or prior to the date specified by the Administrative Agent shall be deemed not to have consented to accept its additional Commitments. The Administrative Agent shall, after receiving the notifications from all of the Designated Lenders or following the date specified in the notice to such Designated Lenders, whichever is earlier, notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the results thereof and the effective date of any additional Commitments. The Borrower shall deliver (i) a certificate signed by a duly authorized officer of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, dated as of the effective date of such additional Commitments, stating that all conditions precedent to an Extension of Credit set forth in Section 3.02 are true and correct on and as of such effective date and (ii) a favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), as to such matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.

(c) Promptly following the effective date of any Commitment increase pursuant to this Section 2.07, (i) the Administrative Agent shall distribute an amended Schedule I to this Agreement (which shall thereafter be incorporated into this Agreement) to reflect any changes in Lenders, the Commitments and each Lender’s Commitment Percentage as of such effective date and (ii) the Borrower shall prepay the outstanding Borrowings (if any) in full, and shall simultaneously make new Borrowings hereunder in an amount equal to such prepayment, so that, after giving effect thereto, the Borrowings are held ratably by the Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitments (after giving effect to such Commitment increase). Prepayments made under this clause (c) shall not be subject to the notice requirements of Section 2.14.

(d) Notwithstanding any provision contained herein to the contrary, from and after the date of any Commitment increase and the making of any Advances on such date pursuant to clause (c)(ii) above, all calculations and payments of fees and of interest on the Advances shall take into account the actual Commitment of each Lender and the principal amount outstanding of each Advance made by such Lender during the relevant period of time.

SECTION 2.08. Termination or Reduction of the Commitments.

(a) The Borrower shall have the right, upon at least three Business Days’ notice to the Administrative Agent, to terminate in whole or reduce ratably in part the Available Commitments, provided that (i) each partial reduction shall be in a minimum amount of $5,000,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and (ii) no such termination or reduction shall be made that would reduce the aggregate Commitments to an amount less than the Outstanding Credits on the date of such termination or reduction.



30

(b) The Borrower may terminate the Available Commitment of any Lender that is a Defaulting Lender in accordance with Section 8.16(a)(vi).

(c) The Commitment of each Lender shall automatically terminate on the Termination Date applicable to such Lender as provided in Section 2.06.

(d) Once terminated, neither a Commitment nor any portion thereof may be reinstated.

SECTION 2.09. Repayment of Advances.

(a) The Borrower shall repay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender on the Termination Date with respect to such Lender the aggregate principal amount of all Advances made by such Lender to the Borrower then outstanding.

(b) If at any time (i) the aggregate principal amount of Outstanding Credits exceed the aggregate Commitments, the Borrower shall pay or prepay so much of the Borrowings and/or deposit funds in the LC Collateral Account equal to 103% of so much of the LC Outstandings as shall be necessary in order that the principal amount of Advances outstanding plus the aggregate amount of LC Outstandings not so cash collateralized will not exceed the Commitments.

SECTION 2.10. Evidence of Indebtedness.

(a) Each Lender shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness to such Lender resulting from each Advance made by such Lender from time to time, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Lender from time to time under this Agreement.

(b) The Administrative Agent shall maintain accounts in which it will record (i) the amount of each Advance made hereunder, the Type of each Advance made and the Interest Period applicable thereto, (ii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from the Borrower to each Lender hereunder and (iii) the amount of any sum received by the Administrative Agent hereunder from the Borrower and each Lender’s share thereof.

(c) The entries made in the accounts maintained pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this Section 2.10 shall, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations therein recorded; provided , however , that the failure of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to maintain such accounts or any error therein shall not in any manner affect the obligations of the Borrower to repay the Advances and interest thereon in accordance with their terms.

(d) Any Lender may request that any Advances made by it be evidenced by one or more promissory notes. In such event, the Borrower shall prepare, execute and deliver to such Lender one or more promissory notes payable to such Lender (or, if requested by such Lender, to such Lender and its assignees) and in a form approved by the Administrative Agent. Thereafter, the Advances evidenced by such promissory notes and interest thereon shall at all times



31

(including after assignment pursuant to Section 8.07) be represented by one or more promissory notes in such form payable to the payee named therein.

SECTION 2.11. Interest on Advances.

The Borrower shall pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Advance from the date of such Advance until such principal amount shall be paid in full, at the following rates per annum:
(a) Base Rate Advances . During such periods as such Advance is a Base Rate Advance, a rate per annum equal at all times to the sum of (x) the Base Rate plus (y) the Applicable Margin for Base Rate Advances in effect from time to time, payable in arrears quarterly on the last day of each March, June, September and December during such periods and on the date such Base Rate Advance shall be Converted or paid in full.

(b) Eurodollar Rate Advances . During such periods as such Advance is a Eurodollar Rate Advance, a rate per annum equal at all times during each Interest Period for such Advance to the sum of (x) the Eurodollar Rate for such Interest Period for such Advance plus (y) the Applicable Margin for Eurodollar Rate Advances in effect from time to time, payable in arrears on the last day of such Interest Period and, if such Interest Period has a duration of more than three months, on each day that occurs during such Interest Period every three months from the first day of such Interest Period and on the date such Eurodollar Rate Advance shall be Converted or paid in full.

(c) Additional Interest on Eurodollar Rate Advances . The Borrower shall pay to each Lender, so long as such Lender shall be required under regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to maintain reserves with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities, additional interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Lender, from the date of such Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at an interest rate per annum equal at all times to the remainder obtained by subtracting (i) the Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for such Advance from (ii) the rate obtained by dividing such Eurodollar Rate by a percentage equal to 100% minus the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage of such Lender for such Interest Period, payable on each date on which interest is payable on such Advance. Such additional interest shall be determined by such Lender and notified to the Borrower through the Administrative Agent.

SECTION 2.12. Interest Rate Determination.

(a) The Administrative Agent shall give prompt notice to the Borrower and the Lenders of the applicable interest rate determined by the Administrative Agent for purposes of Section 2.11(a) or (b), and, if applicable, the rate for the purpose of determining the applicable interest rate under Section 2.11(c).




32

(b) If, with respect to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, (i) the Required Lenders notify the Administrative Agent that the Eurodollar Rate for any Interest Period for such Advances will not adequately reflect the cost to such Required Lenders of making, funding or maintaining their respective Eurodollar Rate Advances for such Interest Period, or (ii) the Administrative Agent determines that adequate and fair means do not exist for ascertaining the applicable interest rate on the basis provided for in the definition of Eurodollar Rate, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith so notify the Borrower and the Lenders, whereupon (A) each Eurodollar Rate Advance will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into a Base Rate Advance, and (B) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended until the Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders that the circumstances causing such suspension no longer exist.

(c) If the Borrower shall fail to select the duration of any Interest Period for any Eurodollar Rate Advances in accordance with the provisions contained in the definition of “Interest Period” in Section 1.01, the Administrative Agent will forthwith so notify the Borrower and the Lenders and such Advances will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into Base Rate Advances.

(d) On the date on which the aggregate unpaid principal amount of Eurodollar Rate Advances comprising any Borrowing shall be reduced, by payment or prepayment or otherwise, to less than $10,000,000, such Advances shall automatically Convert into Base Rate Advances.

(e) Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default, (i) each Eurodollar Rate Advance will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into a Base Rate Advance and (ii) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended.

SECTION 2.13. Optional Conversion of Advances.

The Borrower may on any Business Day, upon notice given to the Administrative Agent not later than 12:00 noon on the third Business Day prior to the date of the proposed Conversion and subject to the provisions of Sections 2.12 and 2.16, Convert all or any part of Advances of one Type comprising the same Borrowing into Advances of the other Type or of the same Type but having a new Interest Period; provided , however , that any Conversion of Eurodollar Rate Advances into Base Rate Advances shall be made only on the last day of an Interest Period for such Eurodollar Rate Advances, any Conversion of Base Rate Advances into Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be in an amount not less than the minimum amount specified in Section 2.02(b) and no Conversion of any Advances shall result in more separate Borrowings than permitted under Section 2.02(b). Each such notice of a Conversion shall, within the restrictions specified above, specify (i) the date of such Conversion, (ii) the Advances to be Converted, and (iii) if such Conversion is into Eurodollar Rate Advances, the duration of the initial Interest Period for each such Advance. Each notice of Conversion shall be irrevocable and binding on the Borrower.



33

SECTION 2.14. Optional Prepayments of Advances.

The Borrower may, upon at least two Business Days’ notice, in the case of Eurodollar Rate Advances, and upon notice not later than 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on the date of prepayment, in the case of Base Rate Advances, to the Administrative Agent stating the proposed date and aggregate principal amount of the prepayment, and, if such notice is given, the Borrower shall prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Advances comprising part of the same Borrowing in whole or ratably in part, together with accrued interest to the date of such prepayment on the principal amount prepaid; provided , however , that (x) each partial prepayment shall be in a minimum amount of $5,000,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and (y) in the event of any such prepayment of a Eurodollar Rate Advance, the Borrower shall be obligated to reimburse the Lenders in respect thereof pursuant to Section 8.04(c).
SECTION 2.15. Increased Costs.

(a) Increased Costs Generally . If any Change in Law shall:

(i) impose, modify or deem applicable any reserve, special deposit, compulsory loan, insurance charge or similar requirement against assets of, deposits with or for the account of, or credit extended or participated in by, any Lender (except any reserve requirement reflected in the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage, in the case of Eurodollar Rate Advances) or any LC Issuing Bank;

(ii) subject any Recipient to any Taxes (other than (A) Indemnified Taxes, (B) Taxes described in clauses (b) through (d) of the definition of Excluded Taxes and (C) Connection Income Taxes) on its loans, loan principal, letters of credit, commitments, or other obligations, or its deposits, reserves, other liabilities or capital attributable thereto; or

(iii) impose on any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank or the London interbank market any other condition, cost or expense (other than Taxes) affecting this Agreement or Advances made by such Lender or any Letter of Credit or participation therein;

and the result of any of the foregoing shall be to increase the cost to such Lender or such other Recipient of making, converting to, continuing or maintaining any Advance or of maintaining its obligation to make any such Advance, or to increase the cost to such Lender, such LC Issuing Bank or such other Recipient of participating in, issuing or maintaining any Letter of Credit (or of maintaining its obligation to participate in or to issue any Letter of Credit), or to reduce the amount of any sum received or receivable by such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient hereunder (whether of principal, interest or any other amount) then, upon request of such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient, the Borrower will pay to such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient, as the case may be, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or other Recipient, as the case may be, for such additional costs incurred or reduction suffered.

(b) Capital Requirements . If any Lender or LC Issuing Bank determines that any Change in Law affecting such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or any Applicable Lending Office of



34

such Lender or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, regarding capital or liquidity requirements, has or would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s capital or on the capital of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, as a consequence of this Agreement, the Commitments of such Lender or the Advances made by such Lender, or participations in Letters of Credit held by, such Lender, or the Letters of Credit issued by any LC Issuing Bank, to a level below that which such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company could have achieved but for such Change in Law (taking into consideration such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s policies and the policies of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company with respect to capital adequacy and liquidity), then from time to time the Borrower will pay to such Lender or LC Issuing Bank such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company for any such reduction suffered.

(c) Certificates for Reimbursement . A certificate of a Lender or LC Issuing Bank setting forth the amount or amounts necessary to compensate such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or its holding company, as the case may be, as specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this Section and delivered to the Borrower, shall be conclusive absent manifest error. The Borrower shall pay such Lender or LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount shown as due on any such certificate within ten days after receipt thereof.

(d) Delay in Requests . Failure or delay on the part of any Lender or LC Issuing Bank to demand compensation pursuant to this Section shall not constitute a waiver of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s right to demand such compensation; provided that the Borrower shall not be required to compensate a Lender or LC Issuing Bank pursuant to this Section for any increased costs incurred or reductions suffered more than six months prior to the date that such Lender or LC Issuing Bank notifies the Borrower of the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions, and of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s intention to claim compensation therefor (except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions is retroactive, then the six-month period referred to above shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).

SECTION 2.16. Illegality.

If due to any Change in Law it shall become unlawful or impossible for any Credit Party (or its Eurodollar Lending Office) to make, maintain or fund its Eurodollar Rate Advances, and such Credit Party shall so notify the Administrative Agent, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith give notice thereof to the other Credit Parties and the Borrower, whereupon, until such Credit Party notifies the Borrower and the Administrative Agent that the circumstances giving rise to such suspension no longer exist, the obligation of such Credit Party to make Eurodollar Rate Advances, or to Convert outstanding Advances into Eurodollar Rate Advances, shall be suspended. Before giving any notice to the Administrative Agent pursuant to this Section 2.16, such Credit Party shall use reasonable efforts (consistent with its internal policy and legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to such Credit Party) to designate a different Eurodollar Lending Office if such designation would avoid the need for giving such notice and would not, in the judgment of such Credit Party, be otherwise disadvantageous to such Credit Party. If such notice is given, each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Credit Party then outstanding shall be



35

converted to a Base Rate Advance either (i) on the last day of the then current Interest Period applicable to such Eurodollar Rate Advance if such Credit Party may lawfully continue to maintain and fund such Advance to such day or (ii) immediately if such Credit Party shall determine that it may not lawfully continue to maintain and fund such Advance to such day.
SECTION 2.17. Payments and Computations.

(a) The Borrower shall make each payment to be made by it hereunder not later than 1:00 P.M. on the day when due in Dollars to the Administrative Agent at the Agent’s Account in same day funds without condition or deduction for any counterclaim, defense, recoupment or setoff. The Administrative Agent will promptly thereafter cause to be distributed like funds relating to the payment of principal or interest or commitment fees ratably (other than amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.11(c), 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(c) or 8.16) to the Lenders for the account of their respective Applicable Lending Offices, and like funds relating to the payment of any other amount payable to any Lender to such Lender for the account of its Applicable Lending Office, in each case to be applied in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon its acceptance of an Assignment and Assumption and recording of the information contained therein in the Register pursuant to Section 8.07(c), from and after the effective date specified in such Assignment and Assumption, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments hereunder in respect of the interest assigned thereby to the Lender assignee thereunder, and the parties to such Assignment and Assumption shall make all appropriate adjustments in such payments for periods prior to such effective date directly between themselves.

(b) The Borrower hereby authorizes each Lender, if and to the extent payment owed to such Lender is not made when due hereunder, after any applicable grace period, to charge from time to time against any or all of the Borrower’s accounts with such Lender any amount so due.

(c) All computations of interest based on the rate referred to in clause (i) of the definition of the “Base Rate” contained in Section 1.01 shall be made by the Administrative Agent on the basis of a year of 365 or 366 days, as the case may be, and all computations of interest based on the Eurodollar Rate or the Federal Funds Rate and of commitment fees and LC Fees shall be made by the Administrative Agent on the basis of a year of 360 days, in each case for the actual number of days (including the first day but excluding the last day) occurring in the period for which such interest, commitment fees or LC Fees are payable. Each determination by the Administrative Agent of an interest rate hereunder shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.

(d) Whenever any payment hereunder shall be stated to be due on a day other than a Business Day, such payment shall be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and such extension of time shall in such case be included in the computation of payment of interest or commitment fees, as the case may be; provided, however, that, if such extension would cause payment of interest on or principal of Eurodollar Rate Advances to be made in the next following calendar month or on a date after the Termination Date, such payment shall be made on the next preceding Business Day.



36

(e) Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from the Borrower prior to the date on which any payment is due to a Lender hereunder that the Borrower will not make such payment in full, the Administrative Agent may assume that the Borrower has made such payment in full to the Administrative Agent on such date, and the Administrative Agent may, in reliance upon such assumption, cause to be distributed to each Lender on such due date an amount equal to the amount then due such Lender. If and to the extent that the Borrower shall not have so made such payment in full to the Administrative Agent, each Lender shall repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such amount distributed to such Lender together with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is distributed to such Lender until the date such Lender repays such amount to the Administrative Agent, at the Federal Funds Rate.

SECTION 2.18. Taxes.

(a) Defined Terms . For purposes of this Section 2.18, the term “Lender” includes any LC Issuing Bank and the term “Applicable Law” includes FATCA.

(b) Payments Free of Taxes . Any and all payments by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document shall be made without deduction or withholding for any Taxes, except as required by Applicable Law. If any Applicable Law (as determined in the good faith discretion of an applicable Withholding Agent) requires the deduction or withholding of any Tax from any such payment by a Withholding Agent, then the applicable Withholding Agent shall be entitled to make such deduction or withholding and shall timely pay the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with Applicable Law and, if such Tax is an Indemnified Tax, then the sum payable by the Borrower shall be increased as necessary so that after such deduction or withholding has been made (including such deductions and withholdings applicable to additional sums payable under this Section) the applicable Recipient receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deduction or withholding been made.

(c) Payment of Other Taxes by the Borrower . The Borrower shall timely pay to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with Applicable Law, or at the option of the Administrative Agent timely reimburse it for the payment of, any Other Taxes.

(d) Indemnification by the Borrower . The Borrower shall indemnify each Recipient, within 10 days after demand therefor, for the full amount of any Indemnified Taxes (including Indemnified Taxes imposed or asserted on or attributable to amounts payable under this Section) payable or paid by such Recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to such Recipient and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Indemnified Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to the Borrower by a Lender (with a copy to the Administrative Agent), or by the Administrative Agent on its own behalf or on behalf of a Lender, shall be conclusive absent manifest error.

(e) Indemnification by the Lenders . Each Lender shall severally indemnify the Administrative Agent, within 10 days after demand therefor, for (i) any Indemnified Taxes attributable to such Lender (but only to the extent that the Borrower has not already indemnified the Administrative Agent for such Indemnified Taxes and without limiting the obligation of the



37

Borrower to do so), (ii) any Taxes attributable to such Lender’s failure to comply with the provisions of Section 8.07(d) relating to the maintenance of a Participant Register and (iii) any Excluded Taxes attributable to such Lender, in each case, that are payable or paid by the Administrative Agent in connection with any Loan Document, and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to any Lender by the Administrative Agent shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Each Lender hereby authorizes the Administrative Agent to set off and apply any and all amounts at any time owing to such Lender under any Loan Document or otherwise payable by the Administrative Agent to the Lender from any other source against any amount due to the Administrative Agent under this subsection (e).

(f) Evidence of Payments . As soon as practicable after any payment of Taxes by the Borrower to a Governmental Authority pursuant to this Section 2.18, the Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent the original or a certified copy of a receipt issued by such Governmental Authority evidencing such payment, a copy of the return reporting such payment or other evidence of such payment reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent.

(g) Status of Lenders . (i) Any Lender that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of withholding Tax with respect to payments made under any Loan Document shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, at the time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, such properly completed and executed documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate of withholding. In addition, any Lender, if reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall deliver such other documentation prescribed by Applicable Law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Lender is subject to backup withholding or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion, execution and submission of such documentation (other than such documentation set forth in Section 2.18(g)(ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (ii)(D) below) shall not be required if in the Lender’s reasonable judgment such completion, execution or submission would subject such Lender to any material unreimbursed cost or expense or would materially prejudice the legal or commercial position of such Lender.

(ii)      Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
(A)      any Lender that is a U.S. Person shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent on or prior to the date on which such Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed copies of IRS Form W-9 certifying that such Lender is exempt from U.S. federal backup withholding tax;

(B)      any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a



38

Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), whichever of the following is applicable:

(i) in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party (x) with respect to payments of interest under any Loan Document, executed copies of IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “interest” article of such tax treaty and (y) with respect to any other applicable payments under any Loan Document, IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “business profits” or “other income” article of such tax treaty;

(ii) executed copies of IRS Form W-8ECI;

(iii) in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of the exemption for portfolio interest under Section 881(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, (x) a certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-1 to the effect that such Foreign Lender is not a “bank” within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, a “10 percent shareholder” of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a “controlled foreign corporation” described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code (a “ U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ”) and (y) executed copies of IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E;

(iv) to the extent a Foreign Lender is not the beneficial owner, executed copies of IRS Form W-8IMY, accompanied by IRS Form W-8ECI, IRS Form W-8BEN, W‑8BEN‑E, a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-2 or Exhibit F-3, IRS Form W-9, and/or other certification documents from each beneficial owner, as applicable; provided that, if the Foreign Lender is a partnership and one or more direct or indirect partners of such Foreign Lender are claiming the portfolio interest exemption, such Foreign Lender may provide a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-4 on behalf of each such direct and indirect partner;

(C)      any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed copies of any other form prescribed by Applicable Law as a basis for claiming exemption from or a reduction in U.S. federal withholding Tax, duly completed, together with such supplementary documentation as may be prescribed by Applicable Law to permit the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine the withholding or deduction required to be made; and

(D)      if a payment made to a Lender under any Loan Document would be subject to U.S. federal withholding Tax imposed by FATCA if such Lender were to fail to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of FATCA (including those contained in Section 1471(b) or 1472(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable), such Lender shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent at the time or times prescribed by law and



39

at such time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent such documentation prescribed by Applicable Law (including as prescribed by Section 1471(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code) and such additional documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as may be necessary for the Borrower and the Administrative Agent to comply with their obligations under FATCA and to determine that such Lender has complied with such Lender’s obligations under FATCA or to determine the amount to deduct and withhold from such payment. Solely for purposes of this clause (D), “FATCA” shall include any amendments made to FATCA after the date of this Agreement.

Each Lender agrees that if any form or certification it previously delivered expires or becomes obsolete or inaccurate in any respect, it shall update such form or certification or promptly notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in writing of its legal inability to do so.

(h) Treatment of Certain Refunds . If any party determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that it has received a refund of any Taxes as to which it has been indemnified pursuant to this Section 2.18 (including by the payment of additional amounts pursuant to this Section 2.18), it shall pay to the indemnifying party an amount equal to such refund (but only to the extent of indemnity payments made under this Section with respect to the Taxes giving rise to such refund), net of all out-of-pocket expenses (including Taxes) of such indemnified party and without interest (other than any interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to such refund). Such indemnifying party, upon the request of such indemnified party, shall repay to such indemnified party the amount paid over pursuant to this subsection (h) (plus any penalties, interest or other charges imposed by the relevant Governmental Authority) in the event that such indemnified party is required to repay such refund to such Governmental Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this subsection (h), in no event will the indemnified party be required to pay any amount to an indemnifying party pursuant to this subsection (h) the payment of which would place the indemnified party in a less favorable net after-Tax position than the indemnified party would have been in if the Tax subject to indemnification and giving rise to such refund had not been deducted, withheld or otherwise imposed and the indemnification payments or additional amounts with respect to such Tax had never been paid. This subsection shall not be construed to require any indemnified party to make available its Tax returns (or any other information relating to its Taxes that it deems confidential) to the indemnifying party or any other Person.

(i) FATCA Withholding . For purposes of determining withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA, from and after the Restatement Effective Date, the Borrower and the Administrative Agent shall treat (and the Lenders hereby authorize the Administrative Agent to treat) the obligations of the Borrower set forth in this Agreement as not qualifying as a “grandfathered obligation” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Sections 1.1471-2(b)(2)(i) and 1.1471-2T(b)(2)(i).

(j) Survival . Each party’s obligations under this Section 2.18 shall survive the resignation or replacement of the Administrative Agent or any assignment of rights by, or the replacement of, a Lender, the termination of the Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all obligations under any Loan Document.




40

SECTION 2.19. Sharing of Payments, Etc.

(a) If any Lender shall obtain any payment (whether voluntary, involuntary, through the exercise of any right of set-off, or otherwise) on account of the Advances owing to it or participations in Letters of Credit (other than pursuant to Section 2.11(c), 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(c) or 8.16 or in respect of Eurodollar Rate Advances converted into Base Rate Advances pursuant to Section 2.16) by the Borrower in excess of its ratable share of payments on account of the Advances to the Borrower and participations in Letters of Credit obtained by all the Lenders, such Lender shall forthwith purchase from the other Lenders such participations in such Advances owing to them and participations in Letters of Credit as shall be necessary to cause such purchasing Lender to share the excess payment ratably with each of them; provided , however , that if all or any portion of such excess payment is thereafter recovered from such purchasing Lender, such purchase from each Lender shall be rescinded and such Lender shall repay to the purchasing Lender the purchase price to the extent of such recovery together with an amount equal to such Lender’s ratable share (according to the proportion of (i) the amount of such Lender’s required repayment to (ii) the total amount so recovered from the purchasing Lender) of any interest or other amount paid or payable by the purchasing Lender in respect of the total amount so recovered. The Borrower agrees that any Lender so purchasing a participation from another Lender pursuant to this Section 2.19 may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, exercise all its rights of payment (including the right of set-off) with respect to such participation as fully as if such Lender were the direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation.

(b) If any Lender shall fail to make any payment required to be made by it pursuant to Sections 2.02(d), 2.03(c), 2.04(e) or 7.05, then the Administrative Agent may, in its discretion and notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof, (i) apply any amounts thereafter received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Lender for the benefit of the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks to satisfy such Lender’s obligations to it or them under such Section until all such unsatisfied obligations are fully paid, and/or (ii) hold any such amounts in a segregated account as cash collateral for, and application to, any future funding obligations of such Lender under any such Section, in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii) above, in any order as determined by the Administrative Agent in its discretion.

SECTION 2.20. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders.

(a) Designation of a Different Lending Office . If any Lender delivers a notice pursuant to Section 2.16, requests compensation under Section 2.15, or requires the Borrower to pay any Indemnified Taxes or additional amounts to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.18, then such Lender shall (at the request of the Borrower) use reasonable efforts to designate a different Applicable Lending Office or to assign its rights and obligations hereunder to another of its offices, branches or Affiliates, if, in the judgment of such Lender, such designation or assignment (i) would eliminate or reduce amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.15 or 2.18, as the case may be, in the future, and (ii) would not subject such Lender to any unreimbursed cost or expense and would not otherwise be disadvantageous to such Lender. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by any Lender in connection with any such designation or assignment.



41

(b) Replacement of Lenders . If any Lender delivers a notice pursuant to Section 2.16, requests compensation under Section 2.15, or requires the Borrower to pay any Indemnified Taxes or additional amounts to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.18 and, in each case, such Lender has declined or is unable to designate a different Applicable Lending Office in accordance with Section 2.20(a), or if any Lender is a Declining Lender, a Defaulting Lender or a Non-Consenting Lender, then the Borrower may, at its sole expense and effort, upon notice to such Lender and the Administrative Agent, require such Lender to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the restrictions contained in, and consents required by, Section 8.07), all of its interests, rights (other than its existing rights to payments pursuant to Section 2.15 or 2.18) and obligations under this Agreement and the related Loan Documents to an Eligible Assignee that shall assume such obligations (which assignee may be another Lender, if such Lender accepts such assignment); provided that:

i. the Borrower shall have paid to the Administrative Agent the assignment fee (if any) specified in Section 8.07(b)(iv);

ii. such Lender shall have received payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal of its Advances and any participations in Letters of Credit funded pursuant to Section 2.04(e), together with all applicable accrued interest thereon, accrued fees and all other amounts payable to it hereunder and under the other Loan Documents (including any amounts under Section 8.04(c)) from the assignee (to the extent of such outstanding principal amounts and accrued interest and fees) or the Borrower (in the case of all other amounts);

iii. in the case of any such assignment resulting from a claim for compensation under Section 2.15 or payments required to be made pursuant to Section 2.18, such assignment will result in a reduction in such compensation or payments thereafter;

iv. no Default shall have occurred and be continuing;

v. such assignment does not conflict with Applicable Law; and

vi. in the case of any assignment resulting from a Lender becoming a Non-Consenting Lender, the applicable assignee shall have consented to the applicable amendment, waiver or consent.

A Lender shall not be required to make any such assignment or delegation if, prior thereto, as a result of a waiver by such Lender or otherwise, the circumstances entitling the Borrower to require such assignment and delegation cease to apply.



42

ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

SECTION 3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement and Initial Extensions of Credit.

This Agreement and the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank, as applicable, to make the initial Extension of Credit to be made by it hereunder shall take effect on the date (the “Restatement Effective Date”) on which each of the following conditions precedent has been satisfied:
(a) The Administrative Agent shall have received on or before the Restatement Effective Date the following, each dated such day, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent in sufficient copies for each Lender:

(i) Certified copies of the resolutions of the board of directors of the Borrower approving this Agreement, and of all documents evidencing other necessary corporate action and Governmental Approvals, if any, with respect to this Agreement.

(ii) A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Borrower certifying the names and true signatures of the officers of the Borrower authorized to sign this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered by the Borrower hereunder.

(iii) A favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), substantially in the form of Exhibit D hereto and as to such other matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.

(iv) A favorable opinion of King & Spalding LLP, counsel for the Administrative Agent, in the form of Exhibit E hereto.

(b) On the Restatement Effective Date, the following statements shall be true and the Administrative Agent shall have received for the account of each Lender a certificate signed by a duly authorized officer of the Borrower, dated such date, stating that:

(i) The representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in Section 4.01 are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the Restatement Effective Date, as though made on and as of such date, and

(ii) No event has occurred and is continuing that constitutes a Default.

(c) The Borrower shall have paid all fees and expenses of the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers and the Lenders then due and payable in accordance with the terms of the Loan Documents (including the fees and expenses of counsel to the Administrative Agent to the extent then due and payable).

(d) The Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts of this Agreement, executed and delivered by the Borrower and the Lenders.



43

(e) The Administrative Agent shall have received all promissory notes (if any) requested by the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.10(d), duly completed and executed by the Borrower and payable to such Lenders.

(f) The Administrative Agent shall have received copies of the Disclosure Documents.

(g) The Administrative Agent shall have received all documentation and information required by regulatory authorities under applicable “know your customer” and anti-money laundering rules and regulations, including, without limitation, the Patriot Act, to the extent such documentation or information is requested by the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Lenders prior to the Restatement Effective Date.

(h) The Administrative Agent shall have received a copy of an agreement among the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and each Departing Lender evidencing the termination of the “Commitment” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of such Departing Lender, and such Departing Lender shall have received payment in full of all “Advances” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of such Departing Lender outstanding as of the Restatement Effective Date, together with all interest accrued and unpaid thereon, any amounts owing in respect of such payment pursuant to Section 8.04(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, all accrued and unpaid commitment fees and LC Fees pursuant to Sections 2.05(a) and 2.05(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, and any other amounts then due and owing by the Borrower to such Departing Lender pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date.

(i) The Swingline Bank (as such term is defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) shall have received payment in full from the Borrower of all “Swingline Outstandings” (as such term is defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) as of the Restatement Effective Date.

(j) The LC Outstandings of each Barclays, Wells Fargo, BTMU and Credit Suisse shall not exceed $75,000,000 for each such LC Issuing Bank as of the Restatement Effective Date.

(k) The Borrower shall have paid to the Lenders all accrued and unpaid commitment fees and LC Fees pursuant to Sections 2.05(a) and 2.05(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, and any other amounts then due and owing by Borrower to the Lenders pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement (other than the Advances and related interest amounts that, pursuant to Section 8.18, are being reallocated and/or continuing to remain outstanding under this Agreement).

(l) The Administrative Agent shall have received copies or other evidence of such other approvals and such other opinions or documents as may be reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent or by any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank through the Administrative Agent.



44

SECTION 3.02. Conditions Precedent to each Extension of Credit.

The obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank, as applicable, to make each Extension of Credit to be made by it hereunder (other than in connection with any Borrowing that would not increase the aggregate principal amount of Advances outstanding immediately prior to the making of such Borrowing) shall be subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 3.01 and on the date of such Borrowing:
(a) The following statements shall be true (and each of the giving of the applicable Notice of Borrowing and the acceptance by the Borrower of the proceeds of such Extension of Credit shall constitute a representation and warranty by the Borrower that on the date of such Extension of Credit such statements are true):

(i) The representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in Section 4.01 (other than the representation and warranty in Section 4.01(e) and the representation and warranty set forth in the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date of such Extension of Credit, before and after giving effect to such Extension of Credit and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on and as of such date, and

(ii) No event has occurred and is continuing or would result from such Extension of Credit or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.

(b) The Administrative Agent shall have received copies or other evidence of such other approvals and such other opinions or documents as may be reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent or by any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank through the Administrative Agent.

ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

SECTION 4.01 Representations and Warranties of the Borrower.

The Borrower represents and warrants as follows:
(a) The Borrower is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated, and each Significant Subsidiary is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated or otherwise organized.

(b) The execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of each Loan Document, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, are within the Borrower’s corporate powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and do not contravene (i) the Borrower’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws, (ii) law binding or affecting the Borrower or (iii) any contractual restriction binding on or affecting the Borrower or any of its properties.



45

(c) Each Loan Document has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower. Each Loan Document is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights in general, and except as the availability of the remedy of specific performance is subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such remedy is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law) and subject to requirements of reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing.

(d) No authorization or approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or any other third party is required for the due execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of any Loan Document.

(e) There is no pending or threatened action, suit, investigation, litigation or proceeding, including, without limitation, any Environmental Action, affecting the Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator that is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect, except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents.

(f) The consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2013, March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods then ended (accompanied by, in the case of such financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, an opinion of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm), copies of each of which have been furnished to each Lender, fairly present (subject, in the case of such financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, to year-end adjustments) the consolidated financial condition of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries as at such dates and the consolidated results of the operations of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for the periods ended on such dates, all in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. Since December 31, 2013, there has been no Material Adverse Change.

(g) No written statement, information, report, financial statement, exhibit or schedule furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank in connection with the syndication or negotiation of this Agreement or included herein or delivered pursuant hereto contained, contains, or will contain any material misstatement of fact or intentionally omitted, omits, or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were, are, or will be made, not misleading.

(h) Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents, the Borrower and each Significant Subsidiary is in material compliance with all laws (including ERISA and Environmental Laws) rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority applicable to it.



46

(i) No failure to satisfy the minimum funding standard applicable to a Plan for a plan year (as described in Section 302 of ERISA and Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code) that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, whether or not waived, has occurred with respect to any Plan. The Borrower has not incurred, and does not presently expect to incur, any withdrawal liability under Title IV of ERISA with respect to any Multiemployer Plan that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The Borrower and each of its ERISA Affiliates have complied in all material respects with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with foreign law applicable to its Foreign Plans, if any. As used herein, the term “ Plan ” means an “employee pension benefit plan” (as defined in Section 3 of ERISA) which is and has been established or maintained, or to which contributions are or have been made or should be made according to the terms of the plan, by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates. The term “ Multiemployer Plan ” means any Plan which is a “multiemployer plan” (as such term is defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA). The term “ Foreign Plan ” means any pension, profit-sharing, deferred compensation, or other employee benefit plan, program or arrangement maintained by any Subsidiary which, under applicable local foreign law, is required to be funded through a trust or other funding vehicle.

(j) The Borrower and its Subsidiaries have filed or caused to be filed all material Federal, state and local tax returns that are required to be filed by them, and have paid or caused to be paid all material taxes shown to be due and payable on such returns or on any assessments received by them (to the extent that such taxes and assessments have become due and payable) other than those taxes contested in good faith and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP.

(k) The Borrower is not engaged in the business of extending credit for the purpose of buying or carrying Margin Stock, and no proceeds of any Advance will be used to buy or carry any Margin Stock or to extend credit to others for the purpose of buying or carrying any Margin Stock. Not more than 25% of the assets of the Borrower and the Significant Subsidiaries that are subject to the restrictions of Section 5.02(a), (c) or (d) constitute Margin Stock.

(l) Neither the Borrower nor any Significant Subsidiary is an “investment company,” or an “affiliated person” of, or “promoter” or “principal underwriter” for, an “investment company”, as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither the making of any Extension of Credit, the application of the proceeds or repayment thereof by the Borrower nor the consummation of the other transactions contemplated hereby will violate any provision of such Act or any rule, regulation or order of the SEC thereunder.

(m) All Significant Subsidiaries as of the date hereof are listed on Schedule 4.01(m) hereto.

(n) The Borrower has implemented and maintains in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions, and the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors and officers and, to the knowledge of the Borrower, its employees and agents, are in compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions in all material respects. None of (a) the Borrower, any Subsidiary or any of



47

their respective directors or officers, or (b) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any employee or agent of the Borrower or any Subsidiary that will act in any capacity in connection with or benefit from the credit facility established hereby, is a Sanctioned Person. No Borrowing, Letter of Credit, or use of proceeds thereof or other transaction contemplated by this Agreement will violate Anti-Corruption Laws or applicable Sanctions.

ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER

SECTION 5.01. Affirmative Covenants.

So long as any Advance or any other amount payable hereunder shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will:
(a) Preservation of Existence, Etc. Preserve and maintain, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to preserve and maintain, its corporate, partnership or limited liability company (as the case may be) existence and all material rights (charter and statutory) and franchises; provided , however , that the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary may consummate any merger or consolidation permitted under Section 5.02(a); and provided further that neither the Borrower nor any Significant Subsidiary shall be required to preserve any right or franchise if (i) the board of directors of the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, shall determine that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct of the business of the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, and that the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, or to the Lenders; (ii) required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law; or (iii) required in connection with the RTO Transaction; and provided further, that no Significant Subsidiary shall be required to preserve and maintain its corporate existence if (x) the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Borrower or to the Lenders or (y) required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law or (z) required in connection with the RTO Transaction.

(b) Compliance with Laws, Etc. Comply, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to comply, in all material respects, with Applicable Law, with such compliance to include, without limitation, compliance with ERISA and Environmental Laws.

(c) Performance and Compliance with Other Agreements . Perform and comply, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to perform and comply, with the provisions of each indenture, credit agreement, contract or other agreement by which it is bound, the non-performance or non-compliance with which would result in a Material Adverse Change.

(d) Inspection Rights . At any reasonable time and from time to time, permit the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender or any agents or representatives thereof to examine and make copies of and abstracts from the records and books of account of, and visit the properties of, the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary and to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary with any of their officers or directors and with their independent certified public accountants.



48

(e) Maintenance of Properties, Etc. Maintain and preserve, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to maintain and preserve, all of its properties that are used or useful in the conduct of its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted and except as required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law or in connection with RTO Transaction.

(f) Maintenance of Insurance . Maintain, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to maintain, insurance with responsible and reputable insurance companies or associations in such amounts and covering such risks as is usually carried by companies engaged in similar businesses and owning similar properties; provided , however , that the Borrower and each Significant Subsidiary may self-insure to the same extent as other companies engaged in similar businesses and owning similar properties and to the extent consistent with prudent business practice.

(g) Payment of Taxes, Etc. Pay and discharge, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to pay and discharge, before the same shall become delinquent, (i) all taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies imposed upon it or upon its property and (ii) all lawful claims that, if unpaid, might by law become a Lien upon its property; provided , however , that neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to pay or discharge any such tax, assessment, charge or claim that is being contested in good faith and by proper proceedings and as to which adequate reserves are being maintained in accordance with GAAP, unless and until any Lien resulting therefrom attaches to its property and becomes enforceable against its other creditors.

(h) Keeping of Books . Keep, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to keep, proper books of record and account, in which full and correct entries shall be made of all financial transactions and the assets and business of the Borrower and each such Significant Subsidiary in accordance with GAAP.

(i) Reporting Requirements . Furnish to the Lenders:

(i) as soon as available and in any event within 60 days after the end of each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a copy of the Borrower’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for such quarter, as filed with the SEC, which shall contain a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such quarter and consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the period commencing at the end of the previous fiscal year and ending with the end of such quarter, duly certified (subject to year-end audit adjustments) by the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as having been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and a certificate of the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as to compliance with the terms of this Agreement and (A) certifying that there have been no Subsidiaries that have become Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, or any Subsidiaries that have ceased to be Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, in each case except as expressly identified in such certificate, and (B) setting forth in reasonable detail the calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with Section 5.03, provided that in the



49

event of any change in GAAP used in the preparation of such financial statements, the Borrower shall also provide, if necessary for the determination of compliance with Section 5.03, a statement of reconciliation conforming such financial statements to GAAP in effect on the date hereof;

(ii) as soon as available and in any event within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a copy of the Borrower’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year, as filed with the SEC, which shall contain a copy of the annual audit report for such year for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, containing a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such fiscal year and consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such fiscal year, in each case accompanied by an opinion by Deloitte & Touche LLP or another independent registered public accounting firm acceptable to the Required Lenders, and consolidating statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such fiscal year, and a certificate of the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as to compliance with the terms of this Agreement and (A) certifying that there have been no Subsidiaries that have become Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, or any Subsidiaries that have ceased to be Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, in each case except as expressly identified in such certificate, and (B) setting forth in reasonable detail the calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with Section 5.03, provided that in the event of any change in GAAP used in the preparation of such financial statements, the Borrower shall also provide, if necessary for the determination of compliance with Section 5.03, a statement of reconciliation conforming such financial statements to GAAP in effect on the date hereof;

(iii) as soon as possible and in any event within five days after the chief financial officer or treasurer of the Borrower obtains knowledge of the occurrence of each Default continuing on the date of such statement, a statement of the chief financial officer or treasurer of the Borrower setting forth details of such Default and the action that the Borrower has taken and proposes to take with respect thereto;

(iv) promptly after the sending or filing thereof, copies of all Reports on Form 8-K that the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary files with the SEC or any national securities exchange;

(v) promptly after the commencement thereof, notice of all actions and proceedings before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator affecting the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary of the type described in Section 4.01(e); and

(vi) such other information respecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries as any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender through the Administrative Agent may from time to time reasonably request.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the information required to be delivered pursuant to clauses (i), (ii) and (iv) shall be deemed to have been delivered if such information shall be available on the website of the SEC at http://www.sec.gov or any successor website;



50

provided that the compliance certificates required under clauses (i) and (ii) shall be delivered in the manner specified in Section 8.02(b).
(j) Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and Sanctions . Maintain in effect and enforce policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions.

SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants.

So long as any Advance or any other amount payable hereunder shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower agrees that it will not:
(a) Mergers, Etc. Merge or consolidate with or into any Person, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to do so, except that (i) any Subsidiary may merge or consolidate with or into any other Subsidiary of the Borrower, (ii) any Subsidiary may merge into the Borrower, (iii) any Significant Subsidiary may merge with or into any other Person so long as such Significant Subsidiary continues to be a Significant Subsidiary of the Borrower and (iv) the Borrower may merge with any other Person so long as the successor entity (if other than the Borrower) assumes, in form reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, all of the obligations of the Borrower under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents and has long-term senior unsecured debt ratings issued (and confirmed after giving effect to such merger) by S&P or Moody’s of at least BBB- and Baa3, respectively (or if no such ratings have been issued, commercial paper ratings issued (and confirmed after giving effect to such merger) by S&P and Moody’s of at least A-3 and P-3, respectively), provided , in each case, that no Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of such proposed transaction or would result therefrom.

(b) Stock of Significant Subsidiaries. Sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, other than (i) in connection with an RTO Transaction, but only if no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from such RTO Transaction, or (ii) pursuant to the requirements of any Restructuring Law, equity interests in any Significant Subsidiary of the Borrower (other than AEP Resources, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc. or CSW Energy, Inc.) if such Significant Subsidiary would cease to be a Subsidiary as a result of such sale, lease, transfer or disposition.

(c) Sales, Etc. of Assets . Sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, or permit any Significant Subsidiary (other than AEP Resources, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc. or CSW Energy, Inc.) to sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, any assets, or grant any option or other right to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire any assets, except (i) sales in the ordinary course of its business, (ii) sales, leases, transfers or dispositions of assets to any Person that is not a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Borrower that in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the Consolidated Tangible Net Assets of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, whether in one transaction or a series of transactions, (iii) other sales, leases, transfers and dispositions made in connection with an RTO Transaction or pursuant to the requirements of any Restructuring Law or to a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Borrower, or (iv) sales of pollution control assets to a state or local government or any political subdivision or agency thereof in connection with any



51

transaction with such Person pursuant to which such Person sells or otherwise transfers such pollution control assets back to the Borrower or a Subsidiary under an installment sale, loan or similar agreement, in each case in connection with the issuance of pollution control or similar bonds.

(d) Liens, Etc. Create or suffer to exist, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to create or suffer to exist, any Lien on or with respect to any of its properties, including, without limitation, on or with respect to equity interests in any Subsidiary of the Borrower, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, or assign, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to assign, any right to receive income (other than in connection with Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds and the sale of accounts receivable by the Borrower), other than (i) Permitted Liens, (ii) the Liens existing on the date hereof, (iii) Liens securing first mortgage bonds issued by any Subsidiary of the Borrower the rates or charges of which are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any state governmental authority, provided that the aggregate principal amount of such first mortgage bonds of any such Subsidiary do not exceed 66 2/3% of the net value of plant, property and equipment of such Subsidiary and (iv) the replacement, extension or renewal of any Lien permitted by clauses (ii) and (iii) above upon or in the same property theretofore subject thereto or the replacement, extension or renewal (without increase in the amount or change in any direct or contingent obligor) of the Debt secured thereby.

(e) Restrictive Agreements . Enter into, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to enter into (except in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law), any agreement after the date hereof, or amend, supplement or otherwise modify any agreement existing on the date hereof, that imposes any restriction on the ability of any Significant Subsidiary to make payments, directly or indirectly, to its shareholders by way of dividends, advances, repayment of loans or intercompany charges, expenses and accruals or other returns on investments that is more restrictive than any such restriction applicable to such Significant Subsidiary on the date hereof; provided , however , that any Significant Subsidiary may agree to a financial covenant limiting its ratio of Consolidated Debt to Consolidated Capital to no more than 0.675 to 1.000.

(f) ERISA . (i) Terminate or withdraw from, or permit any of its ERISA Affiliates to terminate or withdraw from, any Plan with respect to which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates may have any liability by reason of such termination or withdrawal, if such termination or withdrawal could have a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) incur a full or partial withdrawal, or permit any ERISA Affiliate to incur a full or partial withdrawal, from any Multiemployer Plan with respect to which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates may have any liability by reason of such withdrawal, if such withdrawal could have a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) otherwise fail, or permit any of its ERISA Affiliates to fail, to comply in all material respects with ERISA or the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code if such noncompliances, singly or in the aggregate, could have a Material Adverse Effect, or (iv) fail, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to fail, to comply with Applicable Law with respect to any Foreign Plan if such noncompliances, singly or in the aggregate, could have a Material Adverse Effect.

(g) Margin Stock . Use the proceeds of any Extension of Credit to buy or carry Margin Stock.



52

(h) No Violation of Anti-Corruption Laws or Sanctions . Request any Borrowing or Letter of Credit, or use or permit any of its Subsidiaries or its or their respective directors, officers, employees and agents to use, directly or, to the actual knowledge of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, indirectly, any Letter of Credit or the proceeds of any Borrowing or Letter of Credit (A) in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment or giving of money, or anything else of value, to any Person in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws, (B) for the purpose of funding, financing or facilitating any activities, business or transaction of or with any Sanctioned Person, or in any Sanctioned Country, or (C) in any manner that would result in the violation of any Sanctions applicable to any party hereto.

SECTION 6.01. Financial Covenant.

So long as any Advance shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will maintain a ratio of Consolidated Debt to Consolidated Capital, as of the last day of each March, June, September and December, of not greater than 0.675 to 1.000.
ARTICLE VI
EVENTS OF DEFAULT

SECTION 6.01. Events of Default.

If any of the following events (“ Events of Default ”) shall occur and be continuing:
(a) The Borrower shall fail to pay any principal of any Advance when the same becomes due and payable, or shall fail to pay any interest on any Advance or make any other payment of fees or other amounts payable under this Agreement within five days after the same becomes due and payable; or

(b) Any representation or warranty made by the Borrower herein or by the Borrower (or any of its officers) in connection with this Agreement shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made; or

(c) (i) The Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 5.01(a), 5.01(i)(iii) or 5.02 (other than Section 5.02(f)), or (ii) the Borrower shall fail to provide cash collateral in accordance with Section 2.04(b), 2.09(b), 8.16(a)(v) or 8.17, or (iii) the Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any other term, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement or any other Loan Document if such failure shall remain unremedied for 30 days after written notice thereof shall have been given to the Borrower by the Administrative Agent or any Lender; or

(d) Any event shall occur or condition shall exist under any agreement or instrument relating to Debt of the Borrower (but excluding Debt outstanding hereunder) or any Significant Subsidiary outstanding in a principal or notional amount of at least $50,000,000 in the aggregate if the effect of such event or condition is to accelerate or require early termination of the maturity or tenor of such Debt, or any such Debt shall be declared to be due and payable, or required to be prepaid or redeemed (other than by a regularly scheduled required prepayment or redemption), terminated, purchased or defeased, or an offer to prepay, redeem, purchase or defease such Debt



53

shall be required to be made, in each case prior to the stated maturity or the original tenor thereof; or

(e) The Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary shall generally not pay its debts as such debts become due, or shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally, or shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or any proceeding shall be instituted by or against the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking liquidation, winding up, reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, protection, relief, or composition of it or its debts under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization or relief of debtors, or seeking the entry of an order for relief or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for it or for any substantial part of its property and, in the case of any such proceeding instituted against it (but not instituted by it), either such proceeding shall remain undismissed or unstayed for a period of 60 days, or any of the actions sought in such proceeding (including, without limitation, the entry of an order for relief against, or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for, it or for any substantial part of its property) shall occur; or the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary shall take any corporate action to authorize any of the actions set forth above in this subsection (e); or

(f) (i) Any entity, person (within the meaning of Section 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”)) or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) that as of the date hereof was beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of less than 30% of the Borrower’s Voting Stock shall acquire a beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the SEC under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of Voting Stock of the Borrower (or other securities convertible into such Voting Stock) representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of all Voting Stock of the Borrower; or (ii) during any period of up to 24 consecutive months, commencing after the date hereof, individuals who at the beginning of such 24-month period were directors of the Borrower shall cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of the Borrower, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof, whose election, or nomination for election by the Borrower’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors of the board of directors of the Borrower as comprised as of the date hereof (other than the election or nomination of an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the directors of the Borrower) shall be, for purposes of this provision, considered as though such person were a member of the board as of the date hereof; or

(g) Any judgment or order for the payment of money in excess of $50,000,000 in the case of the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary to the extent not paid or insured shall be rendered against the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary and either (i) enforcement proceedings shall have been commenced by any creditor upon such judgment or order or (ii) there shall be any period of 30 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement of such judgment or order, by reason of a pending appeal or otherwise, shall not be in effect; or

(h) (i) The termination of or withdrawal from the United Mine Workers’ of America 1974 Pension Trust by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates shall have occurred and the liability of the Borrower and its ERISA Affiliates related to such termination or withdrawal



54

exceeds $75,000,000 in the aggregate; or (ii) any other ERISA Event shall have occurred and the liability of the Borrower and its ERISA Affiliates related to such ERISA Event exceeds $50,000,000;

then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent (i) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank to make Extensions of Credit to be terminated, whereupon the same shall forthwith terminate, and (ii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the outstanding Borrowings, all interest thereon and all other amounts payable under this Agreement to be forthwith due and payable, whereupon the outstanding Borrowings, all such interest and all such amounts shall become and be forthwith due and payable by the Borrower, without presentment, demand, protest or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower; provided , however , that in the event of an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to the Borrower under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, (A) the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank to make Extensions of Credit shall automatically be terminated and (B) the outstanding Borrowings, all such interest and all such amounts shall automatically become and be due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or any notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower.

SECTION 6.02. Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default.

If any Event of Default described in Section 6.01(e) shall have occurred and be continuing or the Borrowings shall have otherwise been accelerated or the Commitments terminated pursuant to Section 6.01, then the Administrative Agent may, or shall at the request of the Required Lenders, make demand upon the Borrower to, and forthwith upon such demand the Borrower will, deposit in the LC Collateral Account with the Administrative Agent, in the name of the Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, in same day funds, an amount equal to 103% of the aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date. If at any time the Administrative Agent determines that any funds held in the LC Collateral Account are subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks or that the total amount of such funds is less than 103% of the aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date, the Borrower will, forthwith upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay to the Administrative Agent, as additional funds to be deposited and held in the LC Collateral Account, an amount equal to the excess of (i) 103% of such aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date over (ii) the total amount of funds, if any, then held in the LC Collateral Account that the Administrative Agent determines to be free and clear of any such right and claim. Upon the drawing of any Letter of Credit for which funds are on deposit in the LC Collateral Account, such funds shall be applied to reimburse the relevant LC Issuing Bank or Lender holding a participation in the reimbursement obligation of the Borrower to such LC Issuing Bank to the extent permitted by applicable law.



55

ARTICLE VII
THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

SECTION 7.01. Authorization and Action.

Each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank hereby appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under this Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof, together with such powers and discretion as are reasonably incidental thereto. As to any matters expressly provided for in this Agreement as being subject to the discretion of the Administrative Agent, such matters shall be subject to the sole discretion of the Administrative Agent, its directors, officers, agents and employees. As to any matters not expressly provided for by this Agreement (including, without limitation, enforcement or collection of the outstanding Borrowings), the Administrative Agent shall not be required to exercise any discretion or take any action, but shall be required to act or to refrain from acting (and shall be fully protected in so acting or refraining from acting) upon the instructions of the Required Lenders, and such instructions shall be binding upon all Lenders; provided , however , that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action that exposes the Administrative Agent to personal liability or that is contrary to this Agreement or Applicable Law. The Administrative Agent agrees to give to each Lender prompt notice of each notice given to it by the Borrower pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 7.02. Agent’s Reliance, Etc.

Neither the Administrative Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them under or in connection with this Agreement, except for its or their own gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent: (i) may treat each Lender recorded in the Register as the owner of the Commitment recorded for such Lender in the Register until the Administrative Agent receives and accepts an Assignment and Assumption entered into by such Lender, as assignor, and an Eligible Assignee, as assignee, as provided in Section 8.07 and except as provided otherwise in Section 8.16; (ii) may consult with legal counsel (including counsel for the Borrower), independent public accountants and other experts selected by it and shall not be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken in good faith by it in accordance with the advice of such counsel, accountants or experts; (iii) makes no warranty or representation to any Lender and shall not be responsible to any Lender for any statements, warranties or representations (whether written or oral) made in or in connection with this Agreement; (iv) shall not have any duty to ascertain or to inquire as to the performance or observance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement on the part of any Lender or to inspect the property (including the books and records) of any Lender; (v) shall not be responsible to any Lender for the due execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, this Agreement or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; (vi) shall incur no liability under or in respect of this Agreement by acting upon any notice, consent, certificate or other instrument or writing (which may be by fax) believed by it to be genuine and signed or sent by the proper party or parties; and (vii) shall not have any fiduciary duty to any other Lender.



56

SECTION 7.03. Barclays and its Affiliates.

With respect to its Commitments and the Advances made by it, Barclays shall have the same rights and powers under this Agreement as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent; and the term “Lender” or “Lenders” shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated, include Barclays in its individual capacity. Barclays and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, act as trustee under indentures of, accept investment banking engagements from and generally engage in any kind of business with, any Lender, any of its Subsidiaries and any Person who may do business with or own securities of any Lender or any such Subsidiary, all as if Barclays were not the Administrative Agent and without any duty to account therefor to the Lenders.
SECTION 7.04. Lender Credit Decision.

Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01 and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement.
SECTION 7.05 Indemnification.

Each Lender severally agrees to indemnify the Administrative Agent (to the extent not promptly reimbursed by the Borrower and without limiting its obligation to do so) from and against such Lender’s ratable share (determined as provided below) of any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind or nature whatsoever that may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Administrative Agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any action taken or omitted by the Administrative Agent under this Agreement; provided , however , that no Lender shall be liable for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting from the Administrative Agent’s gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. Without limitation of the foregoing, each Lender agrees to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any costs and expenses (including, without limitation, fees and reasonable expenses of counsel) payable by the Borrower under Section 8.04, to the extent that the Administrative Agent is not promptly reimbursed for such costs and expenses by the Borrower after request therefor and without limiting the Borrower’s obligation to do so. For purposes of this Section 7.05, the Lenders’ respective ratable shares of any amount shall be determined, at any time, according to the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of the Advances outstanding at such time and owing to the respective Lenders and (ii) the aggregate unused portions of their respective Commitments at such time. In the event that any Lender shall have failed to make any Advance as required hereunder, such Lender’s Commitment shall be considered to be unused for purposes of this Section 7.05 to the extent of the amount of such Advance. The failure of any Lender to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any amount



57

required to be paid by the Lender to the Administrative Agent as provided herein shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation hereunder to reimburse the Administrative Agent for its ratable share of such amount, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender to reimburse the Administrative Agent for such other Lender’s ratable share of such amount. Without prejudice to the survival of any other agreement of any Lender hereunder, the agreement and obligations of each Lender contained in this Section 7.05 shall survive the payment in full of principal, interest and all other amounts payable hereunder.
SECTION 7.06. Successor Agent.

The Administrative Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Lenders and the Borrower. Upon any such resignation, the Required Lenders shall have the right to appoint a successor Agent to the Administrative Agent that has resigned. If no successor Administrative Agent shall have been so appointed by the Required Lenders, and shall have accepted such appointment, within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent’s giving of notice of resignation, then such retiring Administrative Agent may, on behalf of the Lenders, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a Lender or an Affiliate of a Lender that is commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States or of any State thereof and having a combined capital and surplus of at least $500,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Administrative Agent hereunder by a successor Agent, such successor Administrative Agent shall succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, discretion, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent, and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations under this Agreement. After any retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation hereunder as Administrative Agent, the provisions of this Article VII shall inure to its benefit as to any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was Administrative Agent under this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS

SECTION 8.01. Amendments, Etc.

Subject to Section 8.16(a)(i), no amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the Required Lenders and the Borrower, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given; provided, however , that no amendment, waiver or consent shall (a) unless in writing and signed by all the Lenders (other than, in the case of the following clauses (i) through (iv), any Defaulting Lender), do any of the following: (i) amend Section 3.01 or 3.02 or waive any of the conditions specified therein, (ii) increase the aggregate amount of the Commitments (except pursuant to Section 2.07), (iii) change the definition of Required Lenders or the percentage of the Commitments or of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the outstanding Borrowings, or the number or percentage of the Lenders, that shall be required for the Lenders or any of them to take any action hereunder, or (iv) amend or waive this Section 8.01 or any provision of this Agreement that requires pro rata treatment of the Lenders; or (b) unless in writing and signed by each Lender that is directly affected thereby, do any of the following: (1) increase the amount or extend the termination date of such Lender’s Commitment, or subject



58

such Lender to any additional obligations, (2) reduce the principal of, or interest on, or rate of interest applicable to, the outstanding Advances of such Lender or any fees or other amounts payable to such Lender hereunder, or (3) postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of, or interest on, the outstanding Advances or any fees or other amounts payable to such Lender hereunder; and provided further that (x) no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent or any LC Issuing Bank in addition to the Lenders required above to take such action, affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent or such LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, under this Agreement, and (y) no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent, each LC Issuing Bank and the Required Lenders, amend or waive Section 8.16. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any provision of this Agreement may be amended by an agreement in writing entered into by the Borrower, the Required Lenders and the Administrative Agent if (i) by the terms of such agreement the Commitment of each Lender and the obligations of each LC Issuing Bank not consenting to the amendment provided for therein shall terminate (but such Lender or LC Issuing Bank shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18 and 8.04) upon the effectiveness of such amendment and (ii) at the time such amendment becomes effective, each Lender or LC Issuing Bank not consenting thereto receives payment in full of the principal outstanding amount of and interest accrued on each Advance made by it or any Letter of Credit issued by it and outstanding, as the case may be, and all other amounts owing to it or accrued for its account under this Agreement and is released from its obligations hereunder.
SECTION 8.02. Notices, Etc.

(a) The Borrower hereby agrees that any notice that is required to be delivered to it hereunder shall be delivered to the Borrower as set forth in this Section 8.02. All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing (including fax) and mailed, faxed or delivered, if to the Borrower at its address at 1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215, Attention: Treasurer (fax: (614) 716-2807; telephone: (614) 716-2885; email: jsloat@aep.com), with a copy to the General Counsel (fax: (614) 716-1687; telephone: (614) 716-2929); if to any Initial Lender, at its Domestic Lending Office specified in its Administrative Questionnaire; if to any other Lender, at its Domestic Lending Office specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender; if to the Administrative Agent, at its address at (i) 745 7 th Avenue, New York, NY 10019, Attention: Christopher Aitkin, Barclays Bank PLC (fax: (917) 522-0569; telephone: (212) 320-6564; email: xrausloanops5@barclays.com ), (ii) for notices and communications relating to compliance with the covenants hereunder, 745 7 th Avenue, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10019, Attention: Alicia Borys, Barclays Bank PLC (fax: 212-526-5115; telephone: 212-526-4291; email: Alicia.Borys@barclays.com ); if to any LC Issuing Bank, at 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166, Attention: Letters of Credit/Dawn Townsend (fax: 212-412-5011; telephone: (201) 499-2081; email: xraletterofcredit@barclays.com ) or such address as shall be designated by such LC Issuing Bank and notified to the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.04; or, as to the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other parties and, as to each other party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent. All such notices and communications shall be effective when delivered or received at the appropriate address or number to the attention of the appropriate individual or department, except that notices and communications to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Article II, III or VII shall not be effective until received by the Administrative Agent.



59

Delivery by fax of an executed counterpart of any amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any Exhibit hereto to be executed and delivered hereunder shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart thereof.

(b) The Borrower and the Lenders hereby agree that the Administrative Agent may make any information required to be delivered under Section 5.01(i)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v) (the “ Communications ”) available to the Lenders by posting the Communications on Intralinks, SyndTrak or a substantially similar electronic transmission systems (the “ Platform ”). The Borrower and the Lenders hereby acknowledge that the distribution of material through an electronic medium is not necessarily secure and that there are confidentiality and other risks associated with such distribution.

(c) THE PLATFORM IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE”. THE AGENT PARTIES (AS DEFINED BELOW) DO NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE COMMUNICATIONS, OR THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLATFORM AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM LIABILITY FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE COMMUNICATIONS. NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD-PARTY RIGHTS OR FREEDOM FROM VIRUSES OR OTHER CODE DEFECTS, IS MADE BY THE AGENT PARTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMMUNICATIONS OR THE PLATFORM. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT OR ANY OF ITS RELATED PARTIES (COLLECTIVELY, “ AGENT PARTIES ”) HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO THE BORROWER, ANY LENDER OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LOSSES OR EXPENSES (WHETHER IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF THE BORROWER’S OR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT’S TRANSMISSION OF COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH THE INTERNET, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THE LIABILITY OF ANY AGENT PARTY IS FOUND IN A FINAL, NON-APPEALABLE JUDGMENT BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION TO HAVE RESULTED PRIMARILY FROM SUCH AGENT PARTY’S GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT.

The Administrative Agent agrees that the receipt of the Communications by the Administrative Agent at its e-mail address set forth above shall constitute effective delivery of the Communications to the Administrative Agent for purposes of the Loan Documents. Each Lender agrees that notice to it (as provided in the next sentence) specifying that the Communications have been posted to the Platform shall constitute effective delivery of the Communications to such Lender for purposes of the Loan Documents. Each Lender agrees (i) to notify the Administrative Agent in writing (including by electronic communication) from time to time of such Lender’s e-mail address to which the foregoing notice may be sent by electronic transmission and (ii) that the foregoing notice may be sent to such e-mail address.
Nothing herein shall prejudice the right of the Administrative Agent or any Lender to give any notice or other communication pursuant to any Loan Document in any other manner specified in such Loan Document.



60

SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies.

No failure on the part of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
SECTION 8.04. Costs and Expenses.
 
(a) The Borrower agrees to pay promptly upon demand all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration, modification and amendment of this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder, including, without limitation, (i) all due diligence, syndication (including printing, distribution and bank meetings), transportation, computer, duplication, appraisal, consultant, and audit expenses and (ii) the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel for the Administrative Agent with respect thereto and with respect to advising the Administrative Agent as to its rights and responsibilities under this Agreement. The Borrower further agrees to pay promptly upon demand all costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, if any (including, without limitation, counsel fees and expenses), in connection with the enforcement (whether through negotiations, legal proceedings or otherwise) of this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder, including, without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of counsel for the Administrative Agent, LC Issuing Banks and the Lenders in connection with the enforcement of rights under this Section 8.04(a).

(b) The Borrower agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Lender, each LC Issuing Bank, and the Administrative Agent and each of their Related Parties (each, an “ Indemnified Party ”) from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and liabilities, joint or several, to which any such Indemnified Party may become subject, in each case arising out of or in connection with or relating to (including, without limitation, in connection with any investigation, litigation or proceeding or preparation of a defense in connection therewith) (i) this Agreement, any of the transactions contemplated herein or the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Extensions of Credit (ii) any error or omission in connection with posting of the data required to be delivered pursuant to Section 5.01(i)(i), (ii) or (iv) on the website of the SEC or any successor website or (iii) the actual or alleged presence of Hazardous Materials on any property of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any Environmental Action relating in any way to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, and to reimburse any Indemnified Party for any and all reasonable expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of counsel) as they are incurred in connection with the investigation of or preparation for or defense of any pending or threatened claim or any action or proceeding arising therefrom, whether or not such Indemnified Party is a party and whether or not such claim, action or proceeding is initiated or brought by or on behalf of the Borrower or any of its Affiliates and whether or not any of the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated or this Agreement is terminated, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss, liability or expense is found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from such Indemnified Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. In the case of an investigation, litigation or other proceeding to which the indemnity in this Section 8.04(b) applies, such indemnity shall be



61

effective whether or not such investigation, litigation or proceeding is brought by the Borrower, its directors, shareholders or creditors or an Indemnified Party or any other Person or any Indemnified Party is otherwise a party thereto and whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated. The Borrower agrees not to assert any claim against any Indemnified Party on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or otherwise relating to this Agreement, any of the transactions contemplated herein or the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Extensions of Credit.
 
(c) If any payment of principal of, or Conversion of, any Eurodollar Rate Advance is made by the Borrower to or for the account of a Lender other than on the last day of the Interest Period for such Advance, as a result of a payment or Conversion pursuant to Section 2.09, 2.12(d), 2.15 or 2.17, acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding Borrowings pursuant to Section 6.01, the assignment of any such Advance pursuant to Section 2.20(b) or for any other reason (in the case of any such payment or Conversion), the Borrower shall, promptly upon demand by such Lender (with a copy of such demand to the Administrative Agent), pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of such Lender any amounts required to compensate such Lender for any additional losses, costs or expenses that it may reasonably incur as a result of such payment or Conversion, including, without limitation, any loss (other than loss of Applicable Margin), cost or expense incurred by reason of the liquidation or reemployment of deposits or other funds acquired by any Lender to fund or maintain such Advance.

(d) Without prejudice to the survival of any other agreement of the Borrower hereunder, the agreements and obligations of the Borrower contained in Sections 2.15 and 8.04 shall survive the payment in full of principal, interest and all other amounts payable hereunder.

(e) The Borrower agrees that no Indemnified Party shall have any liability (whether direct or indirect, in contract or tort or otherwise) to the Borrower or its security holders or creditors related to or arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the Extensions of Credit or the use or proposed use of the proceeds thereof, any of the transactions contemplated by any of the foregoing or in the loan documentation or the performance by an Indemnified Party of any of the foregoing (including the use by unintended recipients of any information or other materials distributed through telecommunications, electronic or other information transmission systems in connection with this Agreement or the other Loan Documents) except to the extent that any loss, claim, damage, liability or expense is found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from such Indemnified Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
 
(f) In the event that an Indemnified Party is requested or required to appear as a witness in any action brought by or on behalf of or against the Borrower or any of its Affiliates in which such Indemnified Party is not named as a defendant, the Borrower agrees to reimburse such Indemnified Party for all reasonable expenses incurred by it in connection with such Indemnified Party’s appearing and preparing to appear as such a witness, including, without limitation, the fees and disbursements of its legal counsel.



62

SECTION 8.05. Right of Set-off.

Upon (i) the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default and (ii) the making of the request or the granting of the consent specified by Section 6.01 to authorize the Administrative Agent to declare the outstanding Borrowings due and payable pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.01, each Credit Party and each of its Affiliates is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other indebtedness at any time owing by such Credit Party or such Affiliate to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any and all of the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement held by such Credit Party, whether or not such Credit Party shall have made any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured; provided that, in the event that any Defaulting Lender shall exercise any such right of setoff, (x) all amounts so set off shall be paid over immediately to the Administrative Agent for further application in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.16 and, pending such payment, shall be segregated by such Defaulting Lender from its other funds and deemed held in trust for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Lenders, and (y) the Defaulting Lender shall provide promptly to the Administrative Agent a statement describing in reasonable detail the obligations of the Borrower owing to such Defaulting Lender as to which it exercised such right of setoff. Each Credit Party agrees promptly to notify the Borrower after any such set-off and application, provided that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such set-off and application. The rights of each Credit Party and its Affiliates under this Section are in addition to other rights and remedies (including, without limitation, other rights of set-off) that such Credit Party and its Affiliates may have.
SECTION 8.06. Binding Effect.

This Agreement shall become effective upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent specified in Section 3.01 and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank (upon its appointment pursuant to Section 2.04(a)) and their respective successors and assigns, except that the Borrower shall not have the right to assign its rights hereunder or any interest herein without the prior written consent of all of the Lenders. None of the Joint Lead Arrangers nor any Person designated as a “Documentation Agent” or a “Syndication Agent” with respect to this Agreement shall have any duties under this Agreement.
SECTION 8.07. Assignments and Participations.

(a) Successors and Assigns of Lenders Generally . No Lender may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (i) to an assignee in accordance with the provisions of subsection (b) of this Section, (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Section, or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of subsection (e) of this Section (and any other attempted assignment or transfer by any party hereto shall be null and void). Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in subsection (d) of this Section and, to the extent expressly contemplated




63

hereby, the Related Parties of each of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.

(b) Assignments by Lenders . Any Lender may at any time assign to one or more assignees all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Advances at the time owing to it); provided that any such assignment shall be subject to the following conditions:

(i) Minimum Amounts .

(A)      in the case of an assignment of the entire remaining amount of the assigning Lender’s Commitment and/or the Advances at the time owing to it or contemporaneous assignments to related Approved Funds (determined after giving effect to such assignments) that equal at least the amount specified in subsection (b)(i)(B) of this Section in the aggregate or in the case of an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund, no minimum amount need be assigned; and
(B)      in any case not described in subsection (b)(i)(A) of this Section, the aggregate amount of the Commitment (which for this purpose includes Advances outstanding thereunder) or, if the applicable Commitment is not then in effect, the principal outstanding balance of the Advances of the assigning Lender subject to each such assignment (determined as of the date the Assignment and Assumption with respect to such assignment is delivered to the Administrative Agent or, if the “ Trade Date ” is specified in the Assignment and Assumption, as of the Trade Date) shall not be less than $10,000,000, or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof, unless each of the Administrative Agent and, so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the Borrower otherwise consents (each such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed).
(ii) Proportionate Amounts . Each partial assignment shall be made as an assignment of a proportionate part of all the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Advances or the Commitment assigned.

(iii) Required Consents . No consent shall be required for any assignment except to the extent required by subsection (b)(i)(B) of this Section and, in addition:

(A)      the consent of the Borrower (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) shall be required unless (x) a Default has occurred and is continuing at the time of such assignment, or (y) such assignment is to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund; provided that the Borrower shall be deemed to have consented to any such assignment unless it shall object thereto by written notice to the Administrative Agent within ten Business Days after having received notice thereof;
(B)      the consent of the Administrative Agent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) shall be required for assignments if such



64

assignment is to a Person that is not a Lender, an Affiliate of such Lender or an Approved Fund with respect to such Lender; and
(C)      the consent of each LC Issuing Bank shall be required for any assignment.
(iv) Assignment and Assumption . The parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500 (to be paid by the assigning Lender, or, in the case of an assignment pursuant to Section 2.20(b), the Borrower); provided that the Administrative Agent may, in its sole discretion, elect to waive such processing and recordation fee in the case of any assignment . The assignee, if it is not a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire.

(v) No Assignment to Certain Persons . No such assignment shall be made to (A) the Borrower or any of the Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries or (B) to any Defaulting Lender or any of its Subsidiaries, or any Person who, upon becoming a Lender hereunder, would constitute a Defaulting Lender or a Subsidiary thereof.

(vi) No Assignment to Natural Persons . No such assignment shall be made to a natural Person (or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person).

(vii) Certain Additional Payments . In connection with any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder, no such assignment shall be effective unless and until, in addition to the other conditions thereto set forth herein, the parties to the assignment shall make such additional payments to the Administrative Agent in an aggregate amount sufficient, upon distribution thereof as appropriate (which may be outright payment, purchases by the assignee of participations or subparticipations, or other compensating actions, including funding, with the consent of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, the applicable pro rata share of Advances previously requested but not funded by the Defaulting Lender, to each of which the applicable assignee and assignor hereby irrevocably consent), to (x) pay and satisfy in full all payment liabilities then owed by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent and each Lender hereunder (and interest accrued thereon), and (y) acquire (and fund as appropriate) its full pro rata share of all Advances and Commitments in accordance with its Commitment Percentage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder shall become effective under Applicable Law without compliance with the provisions of this subsection, then the assignee of such interest shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender for all purposes of this Agreement until such compliance occurs.

Subject to acceptance and recording thereof by the Administrative Agent pursuant to subsection (c) of this Section, from and after the effective date specified in each Assignment and Assumption, the assignee thereunder shall be a party to this Agreement and, to the extent of the



65

interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, have the rights and obligations of a Lender under this Agreement, and the assigning Lender thereunder shall, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, be released from its obligations under this Agreement (and, in the case of an Assignment and Assumption covering all of the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, such Lender shall cease to be a party hereto) but shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18 and 8.04 with respect to facts and circumstances occurring prior to the effective date of such assignment; provided , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the affected parties, no assignment by a Defaulting Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender. Any assignment or transfer by a Lender of rights or obligations under this Agreement that does not comply with this subsection shall be treated for purposes of this Agreement as a sale by such Lender of a participation in such rights and obligations in accordance with subsection (d) of this Section.
(c) Register . The Administrative Agent, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, shall maintain at its address referred to in Section 8.02 a copy of each Assignment and Assumption delivered to it and a register in which it shall record the names and addresses of the Lenders, and the Commitments of, and principal amounts (and stated interest) of the Advances owing to, each Lender pursuant to the terms hereof from time to time (the “ Register ”). The entries in the Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Register pursuant to the terms hereof as a Lender hereunder for all purposes of this Agreement. The Register shall be available for inspection by the Borrower and any Lender, at any reasonable time and from time to time upon reasonable prior notice.

(d) Participations . Any Lender may at any time, without the consent of, or notice to, the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, or any LC Issuing Bank, sell participations to any Person (other than a natural Person, or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person, or the Borrower or any of the Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries) (each, a “ Participant ”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and/or obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and/or the Advances owing to it); provided that (i) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (ii) such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations, and (iii) the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks and Lenders shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, each Lender shall be responsible for the indemnity under Section 7.05 with respect to any payments made by such Lender to its Participant(s).

Any agreement or instrument pursuant to which a Lender sells such a participation shall provide that such Lender shall retain the sole right to enforce this Agreement and to approve any amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement; provided that such agreement or instrument may provide that such Lender will not, without the consent of the Participant, agree to any amendment, modification or waiver described in clauses (ii), (iii) or (iv) of the first sentence of Section 8.01 that affects such Participant The Borrower agrees that each Participant shall be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(b) and 8.04(c) (subject to the requirements and limitations therein, including the requirements under Section 2.18(g) (it being understood that the documentation required under Section 2.18(g) shall be delivered to the participating Lender)) to the same extent as if it were a Lender and had



66

acquired its interest by assignment pursuant to subsection (b) of this Section; provided that such Participant (A) agrees to be subject to the provisions of Section 2.20(b) as if it were an assignee under subsection (b) of this Section; and (B) shall not be entitled to receive any greater payment under Sections 2.15 or 2.18, with respect to any participation, than its participating Lender would have been entitled to receive, except to the extent such entitlement to receive a greater payment results from a Change in Law that occurs after the Participant acquired the applicable participation. Each Lender that sells a participation agrees, at the Borrower’s request and expense, to use reasonable efforts to cooperate with the Borrower to effectuate the provisions of Section 2.20(b) with respect to any Participant. To the extent permitted by law, each Participant also shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 8.05 as though it were a Lender; provided that such Participant agrees to be subject to Section 2.18 as though it were a Lender. Each Lender that sells a participation shall, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, maintain a register on which it enters the name and address of each Participant and the principal amounts (and stated interest) of each Participant’s interest in the Commitments, Advances or other obligations under the Loan Documents (the “ Participant Register ”); provided that no Lender shall have any obligation to disclose all or any portion of the Participant Register (including the identity of any Participant or any information relating to a Participant’s interest in any Commitments, Advances, Letters of Credit or its other obligations under any Loan Document) to any Person except to the extent that such disclosure is necessary to establish that such Commitments, Advances, Letters of Credit or other obligations are in registered form under Section 5f.103-1(c) of the United States Treasury Regulations. The entries in the Participant Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and such Lender shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Participant Register as the owner of such participation for all purposes of this Agreement notwithstanding any notice to the contrary. For the avoidance of doubt, the Administrative Agent (in its capacity as Administrative Agent) shall have no responsibility for maintaining a Participant Register.
(e) Certain Pledges . Any Lender may at any time pledge or assign a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement to secure obligations of such Lender, including any pledge or assignment to secure obligations to a Federal Reserve Bank or other central banking authority; provided that no such pledge or assignment shall release such Lender from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such pledgee or assignee for such Lender as a party hereto.

SECTION 8.08. Confidentiality.

Each of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks agree to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information, except that Confidential Information may be disclosed (a) to its Affiliates and to its Related Parties (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Confidential Information and instructed to keep such Confidential Information confidential); (b) to the extent required or requested by any regulatory authority purporting to have jurisdiction over such Person or its Related Parties (including any state, federal or foreign authority or examiner regulating banks, banking or other financial institutions and any self-regulatory authority, such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners); (c) to the extent required by Applicable Law or by any subpoena or similar legal process; (d) to any other party hereto; (e) in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or under any other



67

Loan Document or any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder; (f) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section, to (i) any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement, (ii) any actual or prospective party (or its Related Parties) to any swap, derivative or other transaction under which payments are to be made by reference to the Borrower and its obligations, this Agreement or payments hereunder or (iii) any credit insurance provider relating to the Borrower and its obligations; (g) on a confidential basis to (i) any rating agency in connection with rating the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or this Agreement or (ii) the CUSIP Service Bureau or any similar agency in connection with the issuance and monitoring of CUSIP numbers with respect to this Agreement; (h) with the consent of the Borrower; or (i) to the extent such Confidential Information (x) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section, or (y) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Lender, and LC Issuing Bank or any of their respective Affiliates on a nonconfidential basis from a source other than the Borrower. In addition, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders may disclose the existence of this Agreement and information about this Agreement to market data collectors, similar service providers to the lending industry and service providers to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders in connection with the administration of this Agreement, the other Loan Documents and the Commitments. Any Person required to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information as provided in this Section shall be considered to have complied with its obligation to do so if such Person has exercised the same degree of care to maintain the confidentiality of such Confidential Information as such Person would accord to its own confidential information.
SECTION 8.09. Governing Law.

This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.
SECTION 8.10. Severability; Survival.

(a) In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement should be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.

(b) All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made by the Borrower herein and in the certificates or other instruments delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered to have been relied upon by the other parties hereto and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the making of any Advances and issuance of any Letters of Credit, regardless of any investigation made by any such other party or on its behalf and notwithstanding that the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks or any Lender may have had notice or knowledge of any Default or incorrect representation or warranty at the time any credit is extended hereunder, and shall continue in full force and effect as long as the principal of or any accrued interest on any Advance or any fee or any other amount payable under this Agreement is outstanding and unpaid or any Letter of Credit is outstanding and so long as the Commitments have not expired or terminated.



68

SECTION 8.11. Execution in Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement by fax shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement.
SECTION 8.12. Jurisdiction, Etc.

(a) Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the exclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or federal court of the United States of America sitting in New York City, the County of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in any such New York State court or, to the extent permitted by law, in such federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect any right that any party may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement in the courts of any jurisdiction.

(b) Each of the parties hereto irrevocably and unconditionally waives, to the fullest extent it may legally and effectively do so, any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement in any New York State or federal court. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding in any such court.

SECTION 8.13. Waiver of Jury Trial.

Each of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, each LC Issuing Bank and each Lender hereby irrevocably waives all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim (whether based on contract, tort or otherwise) arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the actions of the Administrative Agent, any LC



69

Issuing Bank, the Borrower or any Lender in the negotiation, administration, performance or enforcement thereof.
SECTION 8.14. USA Patriot Act.

Each of the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks hereby notifies the Borrower that pursuant to the requirements of the USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law as of October 26, 2001)) (as amended, restated, modified or otherwise supplemented from time to time, the “ Patriot Act ”), it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrower, which information includes the name and address of the Borrower and other information that will allow such Lender or LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, to identify the Borrower in accordance with the Patriot Act.
SECTION 8.15. No Fiduciary Duty.

Each of the Administrative Agent, each Lender and each of their respective Affiliates and their officers, directors, controlling persons, employees, agents and advisors (collectively, solely for purposes of this Section 8.15, the “Lenders”) may have economic interests that conflict with those of the Borrower.  The Borrower agrees that nothing in the Loan Documents or otherwise will be deemed to create an advisory, fiduciary or agency relationship or fiduciary or other implied duty between the Lenders and the Borrower, its stockholders or its Affiliates.  The Borrower acknowledges and agrees that (i) the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents are arm’s-length commercial transactions between the Lenders, on the one hand, and the Borrower, on the other, (ii) in connection therewith and with the process leading to such transaction each of the Lenders is acting solely as a principal and not the agent or fiduciary of the Borrower, its management, stockholders, creditors or any other person, (iii) no Lender has assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Borrower with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether any Lender or any of its Affiliates has advised or is currently advising the Borrower on other matters) or any other obligation to the Borrower except the obligations expressly set forth in the Loan Documents and (iv) the Borrower has consulted its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate.  The Borrower further acknowledges and agrees that it is responsible for making its own independent judgment with respect to such transactions and the process leading thereto.  The Borrower agrees that it will not claim that any Lender has rendered advisory services of any nature or respect, or owes a fiduciary or similar duty to the Borrower, in connection with such transaction or the process leading thereto.
SECTION 8.16. Defaulting Lenders.

(a) Defaulting Lender Adjustments . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, then, until such time as such Lender is no longer a Defaulting Lender, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law:

(i) Waivers and Amendments . Such Defaulting Lender’s right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent with respect to this Agreement shall be restricted as set forth in the definition of Required Lenders and in Section 8.01.



70

(ii) Defaulting Lender Waterfall . Any payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Defaulting Lender (whether voluntary or mandatory, at maturity, pursuant to Article VI or otherwise) or received by the Administrative Agent from a Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 8.05 shall be applied at such time or times as may be determined by the Administrative Agent as follows: first , to the payment of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent hereunder; second , to the payment on a pro rata basis of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to any LC Issuing Bank hereunder; third , to Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender in accordance with Section 8.17; fourth , as the Borrower may request (so long as no Default exists), to the funding of any Advance in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has failed to fund its portion thereof as required by this Agreement, as determined by the Administrative Agent; fifth , if so determined by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to be held in a deposit account and released pro rata in order to (x) satisfy such Defaulting Lender’s potential future funding obligations with respect to Advances under this Agreement and (y) Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ future Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender with respect to future Letters of Credit issued under this Agreement, in accordance with Section 8.17; sixth , to the payment of any amounts owing to the Lenders or the LC Issuing Banks as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by any Lender or the LC Issuing Banks against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement; seventh , so long as no Default exists, to the payment of any amounts owing to the Borrower as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by the Borrower against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender's breach of its obligations under this Agreement; and eighth , to such Defaulting Lender or as otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction; provided that, if (x) such payment is a payment of the principal amount of any Advances or LC Outstandings in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has not fully funded its appropriate share, and (y) such Advances were made or the related Letters of Credit were issued at a time when the conditions set forth in Section 3.02 were satisfied or waived, such payment shall be applied solely to pay the Advances of, and LC Outstandings owed to, all Non-Defaulting Lenders on a pro rata basis prior to being applied to the payment of any Advances of, or LC Outstandings owed to, such Defaulting Lender until such time as all Advances and funded and unfunded participations in LC Outstandings are held by the Lenders pro rata in accordance with the Commitments without giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv). Any payments, prepayments or other amounts paid or payable to a Defaulting Lender that are applied (or held) to pay amounts owed by a Defaulting Lender or to post Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 8.16(a)(ii) shall be deemed paid to and redirected by such Defaulting Lender, and each Lender irrevocably consents hereto.

(iii) Certain Fees . (A) No Defaulting Lender shall be entitled to receive any commitment fee pursuant to Section 2.05(a) for any period during which that Lender is a Defaulting Lender (and the Borrower shall not be required to pay any such fee that otherwise would have been required to have been paid to that Defaulting Lender).



71

(B)      Each Defaulting Lender shall be entitled to receive LC Fees for any period during which that Lender is a Defaulting Lender only to the extent allocable to its Commitment Percentage of the stated amount of Letters of Credit for which it has provided Cash Collateral pursuant to Section 8.17.

(C)      With respect to any LC Fee not required to be paid to any Defaulting Lender pursuant to clause (B) above, the Borrower shall (x) pay to each Non-Defaulting Lender that portion of any such LC Fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Lender with respect to such Defaulting Lender’s participation in LC Outstandings that has been reallocated to such Non-Defaulting Lender pursuant to clause (iv) below, (y) pay to each LC Issuing Bank the amount of any such LC Fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Lender to the extent allocable to such LC Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure to such Defaulting Lender, and (z) not be required to pay the remaining amount of any such LC Fee.

(iv) Reallocation of Participations to Reduce Fronting Exposure . All or any part of such Defaulting Lender’s participation in LC Outstandings shall be reallocated among the Non-Defaulting Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitment Percentages (calculated without regard to such Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) but only to the extent that (x) such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits of any Non-Defaulting Lender to exceed such Non-Defaulting Lender’s Commitment and (y) such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits to exceed the aggregate Commitments. No reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Lender arising from that Lender having become a Defaulting Lender, including any claim of a Non-Defaulting Lender as a result of such Non-Defaulting Lender’s increased exposure following such reallocation.

(v) Cash Collateral . If the reallocation described in clause (iv) above cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrower shall, without prejudice to any right or remedy available to it hereunder or under law, Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 8.17.

(vi) Reduction of Available Commitments . The Borrower may terminate the Available Commitment of any Lender that is a Defaulting Lender upon not less than three Business Days’ prior notice to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly notify the Lenders thereof), and in such event the provisions of Section 8.16(a)(ii) will apply to all amounts thereafter paid by the Borrower for the account of such Defaulting Lender under this Agreement (whether on account of principal, interest, fees, indemnity or other amounts); provided that (i) no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and (ii) such termination shall not be deemed to be a waiver or release of any claim the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank, or any Lender may have against such Defaulting Lender.



72

(b) Defaulting Lender Cure . If the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, and each LC Issuing Bank agree in writing that a Lender is no longer a Defaulting Lender, the Administrative Agent will so notify the parties hereto, whereupon as of the effective date specified in such notice and subject to any conditions set forth therein (which may include arrangements with respect to any Cash Collateral), that Lender will, to the extent applicable, purchase at par that portion of outstanding Advances of the other Lenders or take such other actions as the Administrative Agent may determine to be necessary to cause the Advances and funded and unfunded participations in LC Outstandings to be held pro rata by the Lenders in accordance with the Commitments (without giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv)), whereupon such Lender will cease to be a Defaulting Lender; provided that no adjustments will be made retroactively with respect to fees accrued or payments made by or on behalf of the Borrower while that Lender was a Defaulting Lender; and provided , further , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the affected parties, no change hereunder from Defaulting Lender to Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender.

(c) New Letters of Credit . So long as any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, no LC Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, extend, renew or increase any Letter of Credit unless it is satisfied that it will have no Fronting Exposure after giving effect thereto.

(d) Bankruptcy Event of a Parent Company . If (i) a Bankruptcy Event with respect to a Parent of any Lender shall occur following the date hereof and for so long as such event shall continue or (ii) any LC Issuing Bank has a good faith belief that any Lender has defaulted in fulfilling its obligations under one or more other agreements in which such Lender commits to extend credit, no LC Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, amend or increase any Letter of Credit, unless the LC Issuing Bank shall have entered into arrangements with the Borrower or such Lender, satisfactory to such LC Issuing Bank to defease any risk to it in respect of such Lender hereunder.

SECTION 8.17. Cash Collateral

At any time that there shall exist a Defaulting Lender, within one Business Day following the written request of the Administrative Agent or any LC Issuing Bank (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) the Borrower shall Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender (determined after giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv) and any Cash Collateral provided by such Defaulting Lender) in an amount not less than the Minimum Collateral Amount.
(i) Grant of Security Interest . The Borrower, and to the extent provided by any Defaulting Lender, such Defaulting Lender, hereby grants to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the LC Issuing Banks, and agrees to maintain, a first priority security interest in all such Cash Collateral as security for the Defaulting Lenders’ obligation to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings, to be applied pursuant to paragraph (ii) below. If at any time the Administrative Agent determines that Cash Collateral is subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks as herein provided, or that the total amount of such Cash Collateral is less than the Minimum Collateral Amount, the Borrower will, promptly



73

upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay or provide to the Administrative Agent additional Cash Collateral in an amount sufficient to eliminate such deficiency (after giving effect to any Cash Collateral provided by the Defaulting Lender).

(ii) Application . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Cash Collateral provided under this Section 8.17 or Section 8.16 in respect of Letters of Credit shall be applied to the satisfaction of the Defaulting Lender’s obligation to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings (including, as to Cash Collateral provided by a Defaulting Lender, any interest accrued on such obligation) for which the Cash Collateral was so provided, prior to any other application of such property as may otherwise be provided for herein.

(iii) Termination of Requirement . Cash Collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce any LC Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure shall no longer be required to be held as Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 8.17 following (i) the elimination of the applicable Fronting Exposure (including by the termination of Defaulting Lender status of the applicable Lender), or (ii) the determination by the Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank that there exists excess Cash Collateral; provided that, subject to Section 8.16, the Person providing Cash Collateral and each LC Issuing Bank may agree that Cash Collateral shall be held to support future anticipated Fronting Exposure or other obligations.

SECTION 8.18. Reallocations.

The Administrative Agent, the Borrower and each Lender agree that upon the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date, the amount of such Lender’s Commitment is as set forth on Schedule I hereto. Simultaneously with the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date, the Commitments of each of the Lenders, the outstanding amount of all Advances and the participations of the Lenders in outstanding Letters of Credit shall be reallocated among the Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitment Percentages (determined in accordance with the amount of each Lender’s Commitment set forth on Schedule I hereto), and in order to effect such reallocations, each Lender whose Commitment is in an amount that exceeds the amount of its “Commitment” under the Existing Credit Agreement (each an “ Assignee Lender ”) shall be deemed to have purchased all right, title and interest in, and all obligations in respect of, the Commitments of the Lenders whose Commitments are less than their respective “Commitments” under the Existing Credit Agreement (each an “ Assignor Lender ”), so that the Commitments of each Lender will be as set forth on Schedule I hereto. Such purchases shall be deemed to have been effected by way of, and subject to the terms and conditions of, Assignment and Assumptions without the payment of any related assignment fee, and, except for any requested replacement promissory notes to be provided to the Assignor Lenders and Assignee Lenders in the principal amounts of their respective Commitments, no other documents or instruments shall be, or shall be required to be, executed in connection with such assignments (all of which are hereby waived). The Assignor Lenders and Assignee Lenders shall make such cash settlements among themselves, through the Administrative Agent, as the Administrative Agent may direct (after giving effect to any netting effected by the Administrative Agent) with respect to such reallocations and assignments.



74

SECTION 8.19. Amendment and Restatement of Existing Credit Agreement     This Agreement continues in effect the Existing Credit Agreement, and the Existing Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety by the terms and provisions of this Agreement, which shall supersede all terms and provisions of the Existing Credit Agreement effective from and after the Restatement Effective Date. This Agreement is not intended to, and shall not, constitute a novation of any indebtedness or other obligations owing by the Borrower under the Existing Credit Agreement or a waiver or release of any indebtedness or other obligations owing, or any “Defaults” or “Events of Default” (each as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) existing, under the Existing Credit Agreement based on any facts or events occurring or existing at or prior to the execution and delivery of this Agreement. On the Restatement Effective Date, the credit facilities described in the Existing Credit Agreement shall be amended, supplemented, modified and restated in their entirety by the credit facilities described herein, and all “Outstanding Credits” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of the Borrower that are not being paid on such date and remain outstanding as of such date under the Existing Credit Agreement, shall be deemed to be Outstanding Credits under the corresponding facilities described herein, without further action by any Person, except as provided in Section 8.18.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]





S-1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused a counterpart of this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

 
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
 
COMPANY, INC.
 
as Borrower
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Julia A. Sloat
 
Name:
Julia A. Sloat
 
Title:
Treasurer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-2

 
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
 
as Administrative Agent, an LC Issuing Bank and a
 
Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Ann E. Sutton
 
Name:
Ann E. Sutton
 
Title:
Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-3

 
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
 
ASSOCIATION
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Nick Brokke
 
Name:
Nick Brokke
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-4

 
BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Chi-Cheng Chen
 
Name:
Chi-Cheng Chen
 
Title:
Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-5

 
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS
 
BRANCH
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Spaight
 
Name:
Michael Spaight
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Remy Riester
 
Name:
Remy Riester
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-6

 
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Bridget Killackey
 
Name:
Bridget Killackey
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-7

 
CITIBANK, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Amit Vasani
 
Name:
Amit Vasani
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-8

 
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Sherrie I. Manson
 
Name:
Sherrie I. Manson
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-9

 
THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Emily Freedman
 
Name:
Emily Freedman
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-10

 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jerry Wells
 
Name:
Jerry Wells
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-11

 
BNP PARIBAS
 
as a Lendor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Dennis O'Meara
 
Name:
Denis O'Meara
 
Title:
Managing Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Roberto Impeduglia
 
Name:
Roberto Impeduglia
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-12

 
CREDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND
 
INVESTMENT BANK
 
as a Lendor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Darrell Stanley
 
Name:
Darrell Stanley
 
Title:
Managing Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Willis
 
Name:
Michael Willis
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-13

 
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Rebecca Kratz
 
Name:
Rebecca Kratz
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-14

 
MIZUHO CORPORATE BANK, LTD.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Leon Mo
 
Name:
Leon Mo
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-15

 
MORGAN STANLEY BANK, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael King
 
Name:
Michael King
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-16

 
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Frank Lambrinos
 
Name:
Frank Lambrinos
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-17

 
SUNTRUST BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Andrew Johnson
 
Name:
Andrew Johnson
 
Title:
Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-18

 
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Hussam S. Alsahlani
 
Name:
Hussam S. Alsahlani
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-19

 
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Thane Rattew
 
Name:
Thane Rattew
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-20

 
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Eric J. Cosgrove
 
Name:
Eric J. Cosgrove
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-21

 
UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
 
as a Lendor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Lana Gifas
 
Name:
Lana Gifas
 
Title:
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jennifer Anderson
 
Name:
Jennifer Anderson
 
Title:
Associate Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-22

 
COMPASS BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Dixon
 
Name:
Michael Dixon
 
Title:
Sr. Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-23

 
FIFTH THIRD BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael J. Schaltz, Jr.
 
Name:
Michael J. Schaltz, Jr.
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-24

 
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Thomas E. Redmond
 
Name:
Thomas E. Redmond
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-25

 
SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING
 
CORPORATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ James D. Weinstein
 
Name:
James D. Weinstein
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-26

 
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Dan Swanson
 
Name:
Dan Swanson
 
Title:
Staff Officer

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-27

 
THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ John D. Lejto
 
Name:
John D. Lejto
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT A
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF NOTICE OF BORROWING
Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders party
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
[Date]
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, American Electric Power Company, Inc., refers to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended or modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests a Borrowing under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the “ Proposed Borrowing ”) as required by Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement:
(i)      The Business Day of the Proposed Borrowing is __________________, 20__.
(ii)      [The Type of Advances comprising the Proposed Borrowing is [Base Rate Advances][Eurodollar Rate Advances].]
(iii)      The aggregate amount of the Proposed Borrowing is $___________________.
[(iv)      The initial Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the Proposed Borrowing is [[one][two][three][six] month[s]] [OTHER PERIOD OF LESS THAN ONE MONTH AGREED TO BY ALL LENDERS].]
The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Borrowing:
(A)      the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.01 of the Credit Agreement (other than Section 4.01(e) and the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, before and after giving




A-2

effect to the Proposed Borrowing and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on the date hereof; and
(B)      no event has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the Proposed Borrowing or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.
Very truly yours,
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
By:_________     
Name:
Title:
    




Exhibit A
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT B
(to the Credit Agreement)

FORM OF REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE


Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders party
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
[      ], as LC Issuing Bank
[Date]

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned, American Electric Power Company, Inc., refers to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended or modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent for said Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, and hereby gives you notice pursuant to Section 2.04(b) of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests the issuance of a Letter of Credit (the “ Requested Letter of Credit ”) in accordance with the following terms:
(i)      the LC Issuing Bank is _____________;

(ii)      the requested date of [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit (which is a Business Day) is _____________;

(iii)      the expiration date of the Requested Letter of Credit requested hereby is ___________; 1  

(iv)      the proposed stated amount of the Requested Letter of Credit is _______________; 2

(v)      the beneficiary of the Requested Letter of Credit is _____________, with an address at ______________; and

(vi) the conditions under which a drawing may be made under the Requested Letter of Credit are as follows: ___________________; and

 
 
 
 
 
 
1  Date may not be more than one year after the date specified in clause (ii).
 
2  Must be minimum of $100,000.





B-2

(vi)
any other additional conditions are as follows: ___________________.

The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit:
(A)      the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.01 of the Credit (other than Section 4.01 (e) and the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, before and after giving effect to the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on and as of the date hereof; and
(B)      no event has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
By:_________     
Name:
Title:

    


Exhibit B
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT C
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
This Assignment and Assumption (the “ Assignment and Assumption ”) is dated as of the Effective Date set forth below and is entered into by and between [the][each] 1 Assignor identified in item 1 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignor ”) and [the][each] 2 Assignee identified in item 2 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignee ”). [It is understood and agreed that the rights and obligations of [the Assignors][the Assignees] 3 hereunder are several and not joint.] 4 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement identified below (as amended, the “ Credit Agreement ”), receipt of a copy of which is hereby acknowledged by [the][each] Assignee. The Standard Terms and Conditions set forth in Annex 1 attached hereto are hereby agreed to and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Assignment and Assumption as if set forth herein in full.

For an agreed consideration, [the][each] Assignor hereby irrevocably sells and assigns to [the Assignee][the respective Assignees], and [the][each] Assignee hereby irrevocably purchases and assumes from [the Assignor][the respective Assignors], subject to and in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions and the Credit Agreement, as of the Effective Date inserted by the Administrative Agent as contemplated below (i) all of [the Assignor’s][the respective Assignors’] rights and obligations in [its capacity as a Lender][their respective capacities as Lenders] under the Credit Agreement and any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto to the extent related to the amount and percentage interest identified below of all of such outstanding rights and obligations of [the Assignor][the respective Assignors] under the Credit Agreement, and (ii) to the extent permitted to be assigned under applicable law, all claims, suits, causes of action and any other right of [the Assignor (in its capacity as a Lender)][the respective Assignors (in their respective capacities as Lenders)] against any Person, whether known or unknown, arising under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto or the loan transactions governed thereby or in any way based on or related to any of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, contract claims, tort claims, malpractice claims, statutory claims and all other claims at law or in equity related to the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clause (i) above (the rights and obligations sold and assigned by [the][any] Assignor to [the][any] Assignee pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above being referred to herein collectively as [the][an] “ Assigned Interest ”). Each such sale and assignment is without recourse to [the][any] Assignor and, except as expressly provided in this Assignment and Assumption, without representation or warranty by [the][any] Assignor.

 
 
 
 
 
1
For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignor(s), if the assignment is from a single Assignor, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is from multiple Assignors, choose the second bracketed language.  
2
For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignee(s), if the assignment is to a single Assignee, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is to multiple Assignees, choose the second bracketed language.
3
Select as appropriate.
4
Include bracketed language if there are either multiple Assignors or multiple Assignees.   








C-2

1.
 Assignor[s]:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.
Assignee[s]:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[Assignee is an [Affiliate][Approved Fund] of [ identify Lender ]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.
Borrower(s):
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
4.
Administrative Agent:
Barclays Bank PLC, as the Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement
5.
Credit Agreement:
The $1,750,000,000 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2014 among American Electric Power Company, Inc., as the Borrower, the Lenders parties thereto, the LC Issuing Banks parties thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent

6.
Assigned Interest[s]:
Assignor[s]
5  
Assignee[s]
6  
Aggregate Amount of
Commitment/Advances for all
Lenders 7
Amount of
Commitment/Advances Assigned 8
Percentage
 Assigned of Commitment/Advances
8  
CUSIP Number
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 

[7.      Trade Date:          ______________] 9  
[Page break]

 
 
 
 
 
5
List each Assignor, as appropriate.
6
List each Assignee, as appropriate.
7
Amount to be adjusted by the counterparties to take into account any payments or prepayments made between the Trade Date and the Effective Date.
8
Set forth, to at least 9 decimals, as a percentage of the Commitment/Advances of all Lenders thereunder.
9
To be completed if the Assignor and the Assignee(s) intend that the minimum assignment amount is to be determined as of the Trade Date.



EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-3

Effective Date: _____________ ___, 20___ [TO BE INSERTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND WHICH SHALL BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF RECORDATION OF TRANSFER IN THE REGISTER THEREFOR.]
The terms set forth in this Assignment and Assumption are hereby agreed to:

ASSIGNOR[S] 10     

[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]


By:
_____________
Title:


[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]


By:
_____________
Title:

ASSIGNEE[S] 11     

[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]


By:
_____________
Title:

[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]


By:
_____________
Title:


 
 
 
 
 
10
Add additional signature blocks as needed.
11
Add additional signature blocks as needed.


EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-4

[Consented to and] 12      Accepted:

BARCLAYS BANK PLC, as
Administrative Agent


By:     ______________________    
Title:


Consented to:

BARCLAYS BANK PLC, as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     ______________________        
Title:


THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     ______________________        
Title:


CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     ______________________        
Title:




By:     ______________________        
Title:




 
 
 
 
 
12
To be added only if the consent of the Administrative Agent is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.  


EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-5

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     ______________________        
Title:


[Consented to:  

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

By:     ______________________        
Title:] 13  

 
 
 
 
 
13
To be added only if the consent of the Borrower is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.

    



EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


ANNEX 1
$1,750,000,000 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2014 among American Electric Power Company, Inc., as the Borrower, the Lenders parties thereto, the LC Issuing Banks parties thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION

1.
Representations and Warranties .
1.1.
Assignor[s] . [The][Each] Assignor (a) represents and warrants that (i) it is the legal and beneficial owner of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, (ii) [the][such] Assigned Interest is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other adverse claim, (iii) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) it is [not] a Defaulting Lender; and (b) assumes no responsibility with respect to (i) any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Loan Documents or any collateral thereunder, (iii) the financial condition of the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person obligated in respect of any Loan Document or (iv) the performance or observance by the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person of any of their respective obligations under any Loan Document.
1.2.
Assignee[s] . [The][Each] Assignee (a) represents and warrants that (i) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to become a Lender under the Credit Agreement, (ii) it meets all the requirements to be an assignee under Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement (subject to such consents, if any, as may be required thereunder), (iii) from and after the Effective Date, it shall be bound by the provisions of the Credit Agreement as a Lender thereunder and, to the extent of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, shall have the obligations of a Lender thereunder, (iv) it is sophisticated with respect to decisions to acquire assets of the type represented by the Assigned Interest and either it, or the Person exercising discretion in making its decision to acquire the Assigned Interest, is experienced in acquiring assets of such type, (v) it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, and has received or has been accorded the opportunity to receive copies of the most recent financial statements delivered pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 5.01(i) thereof, as applicable, and such other documents and information as it deems appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, (vi) it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this


EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-A1-2

Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, and (vii) attached to the Assignment and Assumption is any documentation required to be delivered by it pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, duly completed and executed by [the][such] Assignee; (b) agrees that (i) it will, independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent, [the][any] Assignor or any other Lender, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Loan Documents, and (ii) it will perform in accordance with their terms all of the obligations which by the terms of the Loan Documents are required to be performed by it as a Lender and (c) appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under the Credit Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms thereof, together with such powers and discretion as are reasonably incidental thereto.
2.
Payments . From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [the][each] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [the][the relevant] Assignee whether such amounts have accrued prior to, on or after the Effective Date. The Assignor[s] and the Assignee[s] shall make all appropriate adjustments in payments by the Administrative Agent for periods prior to the Effective Date or with respect to the making of this assignment directly between themselves. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments of interest, fees or other amounts paid or payable in kind from and after the Effective Date to [the][the relevant] Assignee.
3.
General Provisions . This Assignment and Assumption shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Assignment and Assumption may be executed in any number of counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Assignment and Assumption by fax shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Assignment and Assumption. This Assignment and Assumption shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.


EXHIBIT C
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT D
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE BORROWER
To each of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks party to the
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to below
and to Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent thereunder

November 10, 2014

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This opinion is furnished to you pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(iii) of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (the “ Credit Agreement ”) among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

I am an Associate General Counsel for American Electric Power Service Corporation, an affiliate of the Borrower, and have acted as counsel to the Borrower in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement. I am generally familiar with the Borrower’s corporate history, properties, operations and charter (including amendments, restatements and supplements thereto).

In connection with this opinion, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have examined:

(1)
The Credit Agreement.

(2)
The documents furnished by the Borrower pursuant to Article III of the Credit Agreement .

(3)
The certificate of incorporation of the Borrower and all amendments thereto.

(4)
The by-laws of the Borrower and all amendments thereto.

(5)
A certificate of the Secretary of State of New York, dated November 7, 2014, attesting to the continued existence and good standing of the Borrower in that State.

In addition, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have examined the originals, or copies certified to my satisfaction, of such other corporate records of the Borrower, certificates of public officials and of officers of the Borrower, and agreements, instruments and other documents, as I have deemed necessary as a basis for the opinions expressed below.



D-2

In my examination, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity with the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. In making our examination of documents and instruments executed or to be executed by persons other than the Borrower, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have assumed that each such other person had the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform fully its obligations thereunder, the due authorization by each such other person for the execution, delivery and performance thereof and the due execution and delivery thereof by or on behalf of such person of each such document and instrument. In the case of any such person that is not a natural person, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have also assumed, insofar as it is relevant to the opinions set forth below, that each such other person is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was created and is duly qualified and in good standing in each other jurisdiction where the failure to be so qualified could reasonably be expected to have a material effect upon its ability to execute, deliver and/or perform its obligations under any such document or instrument. I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have further assumed that each document, instrument, agreement, record and certificate reviewed by us for purposes of rendering the opinions expressed below has not been amended by any oral agreement, conduct or course of dealing between the parties thereto.
As to questions of fact material to the opinions expressed herein, I have relied upon certificates and representations of officers of the Borrower (including but not limited to those contained in the Credit Agreement and certificates delivered upon the execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement) and of appropriate public officials, without independent verification of such matters except as otherwise described herein.
Whenever my opinions herein with respect to the existence or absence of facts are stated to be to my knowledge or awareness, it is intended to signify that no information has come to my attention or the attention of other counsel working under my direction in connection with the preparation of this opinion letter that would give me or them actual knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts. However, except to the extent expressly set forth herein, neither I nor they have undertaken any independent investigation to determine the existence or absence of such facts, and no inference as to my or their knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts should be assumed.
I am a member of the Bar of the States of New York and Ohio and do not purport to be expert on the laws of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the States of New York and Ohio and the Federal laws of the United States. My opinions expressed below are limited to the law of the States of New York and Ohio and the Federal law of the United States.

Based upon the foregoing and upon such investigation as I have deemed necessary, and subject to the limitations, qualifications and assumptions set forth herein, I am of the following opinion:

1.
The Borrower (a) is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of New York; (b) has the corporate power and authority, and the legal right, to own and operate its property, to lease the property which it operates as lessee and to conduct the business in which it is




D-3

currently engaged and in which it proposes to be engaged after the date hereof; (c) is duly qualified as a foreign corporation and is in good standing under the laws of each jurisdiction where its ownership, lease or operation of property or the conduct of its business requires such qualification, except any such jurisdiction where the failure to so qualify could not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change; (d) owns or possesses all material licenses and permits necessary for the operation by it of its business as currently conducted; and (e) is in compliance with all Requirements of Law, except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents referenced in Section 4.01(e) of the Credit Agreement or to the extent that the failure to comply therewith could not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The term “Requirements of Law” means the laws of the State of Ohio and the laws, rules and regulations of the United States of America (including, without limitation, ERISA and Environmental Laws) and orders of any governmental authority applicable to the Borrower.

2.
The Borrower has the corporate power and authority, and the legal right, to execute and deliver the Credit Agreement and to perform under, and to borrow under, the Credit Agreement. The Borrower has taken all necessary corporate action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Credit Agreement and the incurrence of Advances on the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, and the Credit Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower.

3.
The execution, delivery and performance of the Credit Agreement and the Advances made thereunder will not violate any Requirements of Law, the Borrower’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws, or any material contractual restriction binding on or affecting the Borrower or any of its properties.

4.
No approval or authorization or other action by, and notice to or filing with, any governmental agency or regulatory body or other third person is required in connection with the due execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement and the performance, validity or enforceability of the Credit Agreement.

5.
Except as described in Section 4.01(e) of the Credit Agreement, no action, suit, investigation, litigation, or proceeding, including, without limitation, any Environmental Action, affecting the Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries before any court, government agency or arbitrator is pending or, to my knowledge, threatened, that is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.

6.
Neither the Borrower nor any of its Significant Subsidiaries is an “investment company”, or an “affiliated person” of, or “promoter” or “principal underwriter” for, an “investment company”, as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither the making of any Advances, the application of the proceeds or repayment thereof by the Borrower nor the



D-4

consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement will violate any provision of such Act or any rule, regulation or order of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

7.
In any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Credit Agreement in any court of the State of Ohio or in any Federal court sitting in the State of Ohio, such court would recognize and give effect to the provisions of Section 8.09 of the Credit Agreement, wherein the parties thereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. However, if a court of the State of Ohio or a Federal court sitting in the State of Ohio were to hold that the Credit Agreement is governed by, and to be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Ohio, the Credit Agreement would be, under the State of Ohio, the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
The opinion set forth above in the last sentence of paragraph 7 above is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditor’s rights generally and to general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.)

I express no opinion as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement; (ii) the effect of the law of any jurisdiction (other than the State of Ohio) wherein any Lender may be located which limits the rates of interest which may be charged or collected by such Lender; and (iii) whether a Federal or state court outside of the States of New York or Ohio would give effect to the choice of New York law provided for in the Credit Agreement.

This opinion has been rendered solely for your benefit in connection with the Credit Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and may not be used, circulated, quoted, relied upon or otherwise referred to by any other Person (other than your respective counsel, auditors and any regulatory agency having jurisdiction over you or as otherwise required pursuant to legal process or other requirements of law) for any other purpose without my prior written consent; provided that, (i) King & Spalding LLP, special counsel for the Administrative Agent, may rely on the opinions expressed in this opinion letter in connection with the opinion to be furnished by them in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement and (ii) any Person that becomes a Lender or an LC Issuing Bank after the date hereof may rely on the opinions expressed in this opinion letter as though addressed to such Person. I undertake no responsibility to update or supplement this opinion in response to changes in law or future events or circumstances.

Very truly yours,



Thomas G. Berkemeyer





EXHIBIT E
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF OPINION OF COUNSEL
FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
[DATE]
To each of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks party to the
Credit Agreement referred to below
and to Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special New York counsel to Barclays Bank PLC, individually and as Administrative Agent, in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders, the LC Issuing Banks named therein and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. This opinion is furnished to you pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(iv) of the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.
In that connection, we have examined the following documents:
(1)      Counterparts of the Credit Agreement, executed by the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Lenders; and
(2)      The other documents furnished by the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Credit Agreement, including (without limitation) the opinion of Thomas G. Berkemeyer, Associate General Counsel for American Electric Power Service Corporation, an affiliate of the Borrower (the “ Opinion ”).
In our examination of the documents referred to above, we have assumed the authenticity of all such documents submitted to us as originals, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authority of the parties executing such documents and the conformity to the originals of all such documents submitted to us as copies. We have assumed that you independently evaluated, and are satisfied with, the creditworthiness of the Borrower and the business terms reflected in the Credit Agreement. We have also assumed that each of the Lenders, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Administrative Agent has duly executed and delivered, with all necessary power and authority (corporate and otherwise), the Credit Agreement.




E-2

To the extent that our opinions expressed below involve conclusions as to matters governed by law other than the law of the State of New York, we have relied upon the Opinion and have assumed without independent investigation the correctness of the matters set forth therein, our opinions expressed below being subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the Opinion. We note that we do not represent the Borrower and, accordingly, are not privy to the nature or character of its businesses. Accordingly, we have also assumed that the Borrower is subject only to statutes, rules, regulations, judgments, orders, and other requirements of law of general applicability to corporations doing business in the State of New York. As to matters of fact, we have relied solely upon the documents we have examined.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications set forth below, we are of the opinion that:
(i)      The Credit Agreement is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
(ii)      While we have not independently considered the matters covered by the Opinion to the extent necessary to enable us to express the conclusions stated therein, the Opinion and the other documents referred to in item (2) above are substantially responsive to the corresponding requirements set forth in Section 3.01 of the Credit Agreement pursuant to which the same have been delivered.
Our opinions are subject to the following qualifications:
(a) Our opinion in paragraph (i) above is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors’ rights generally.

(b) Our opinion in paragraph (i) above is subject to the effect of general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). Such principles of equity are of general obligation, and, in applying such principles, a court, among other things, might not allow a contracting party to exercise remedies in respect of a default deemed immaterial, or might decline to order an obligor to perform covenants.

(c) We note further that, in addition to the application of equitable principles described above, courts have imposed an obligation on contracting parties to act reasonably and in good faith in the exercise of their contractual rights and remedies, and may also apply public policy considerations in limiting the right of parties seeking to obtain indemnification under circumstances where the conduct of such parties in the circumstances in question is determined to have constituted negligence.

(d) We express no opinion herein as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the enforceability of provisions purporting to grant to a party conclusive rights of determination, (iii) the availability of specific performance or other equitable remedies, (iv) the enforceability of rights to indemnity under Federal or state securities laws and (v) the enforceability of waivers by parties of their respective rights and remedies under law.



E-3

(e) In connection with any provision of the Credit Agreement whereby the Borrower submits to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction, we note the limitations of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332 on Federal court jurisdiction.

(f) Our opinions expressed above are limited to the law of the State of New York, and we do not express any opinion herein concerning any other law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the effect of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York wherein any Lender may be located or wherein enforcement of the Credit Agreement may be sought that limits the rates of interest legally chargeable or collectible.

This opinion letter speaks only as of the date hereof, and we expressly disclaim any responsibility to advise you of any development or circumstance, including changes of law of fact, that may occur after the date of this opinion letter that might affect the opinions expressed herein. This opinion letter is furnished to the addressees hereof solely in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement, is solely for the benefit of the addressees hereof and may not be relied upon by any other Person or for any other purpose without our prior written consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this opinion letter may be relied upon by any Person that becomes a Lender after the date hereof in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreement as if this opinion letter were addressed and delivered to such Person on the date hereof. Any such reliance must be actual and reasonable under the circumstances existing at the time such Person becomes a Lender, taking into account any changes in law or facts and any other developments known to or reasonably knowable by such Person at such time.
Very truly yours,

AHC:kty:mgj










EXHIBIT F-1

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Not Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
Reference is hereby made to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and Barclays Bank PLC, as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record and beneficial owner of the Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a certificate of its non-U.S. Person status on IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
[NAME OF LENDER]
By:____________________     
Name:
Title:
Date: ________ __, 20[ ]






EXHIBIT F-2

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Not Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and Barclays Bank PLC, as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record and beneficial owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with a certificate of its non-U.S. Person status on IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender in writing, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]
By:____________________     
Name:
Title:
Date: ________ __, 20[ ]
    







EXHIBIT F-3

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and Barclays Bank PLC, as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its direct or indirect partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such participation, (iii) with respect such participation, neither the undersigned nor any of its direct or indirect partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iv) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (v) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by one of the following forms from each of its partners/members that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption: (i) an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E, or (ii) an IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E from each of such partner’s/member’s beneficial owners that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]
By:____________________     
Name:
Title:
Date: ________ __, 20[ ]
    





EXHIBIT F-4

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and Barclays Bank PLC, as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record owner of the Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its direct or indirect partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment), (iii) with respect to the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, neither the undersigned nor any of its direct or indirect partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iv) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (v) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by one of the following forms from each of its partners/members that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption: (i) an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E or (ii) an IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E from each of such partner’s/member’s beneficial owners that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.




F-4-2

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
[NAME OF LENDER]
By:____________________     
Name:
Title:
Date: ________ __, 20[ ]





Schedule I

Schedule of Initial Lenders
Lender Name
Commitment
Barclays Bank PLC
$86,875,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
$86,875,000
Citibank, N.A.
$86,875,000
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
$86,875,000
KeyBank National Association
$86,875,000
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.
$86,875,000
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
$86,875,000
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
$86,875,000
Bank of America, N.A.
$68,750,000
BNP Paribas
$68,750,000
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
$68,750,000
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
$68,750,000
Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.
$68,750,000
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.
$68,750,000
Royal Bank of Canada
$68,750,000
SunTrust Bank
$68,750,000
The Bank of New York Mellon
$68,750,000
The Bank of Nova Scotia
$68,750,000
U.S. Bank National Association
$68,750,000
UBS AG, Stamford Branch
$68,750,000
Compass Bank
$45,000,000
Fifth Third Bank
$45,000,000
PNC Bank, National Association
$45,000,000
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
$45,000,000
The Huntington National Bank
$25,000,000
The Northern Trust Company
$25,000,000
 
 
Total
$1,750,000,000



Schedule I
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


Schedule 4.01(m)
Significant Subsidiaries
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Indiana Michigan Power Company
AEP Utilities, Inc.
Southwestern Electric Power Company

Schedule 4.01(M)
AEP - SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Exhibit 4(c)

CONFORMED COPY
 
U.S. $1,750,000,000

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of November 10, 2014
among
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
as the Borrower
THE LENDERS NAMED HEREIN
as Initial Lenders
THE LC ISSUING BANKS NAMED HEREIN
and
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as Administrative Agent
 
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
RBS SECURITIES INC.
Joint Lead Arrangers

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC
Syndication Agent
CITIBANK, N.A.
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Documentation Agents


 










TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
 
 
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS
1

 
 
SECTION 1.01. Certain Defined Terms
1

SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods
21

SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms
21

SECTION 1.04. Other Interpretive Provisions
21

 
 
ARTICLE II AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES
21

 
 
SECTION 2.01. The Advances
21

SECTION 2.02. Making the Advances
21

SECTION 2.03. [Reserved]
23

SECTION 2.04. Letters of Credit
23

SECTION 2.05. Fees
27

SECTION 2.06. Extension of the Termination Date
27

SECTION 2.07. Increase of the Commitments
28

SECTION 2.08. Termination or Reduction of the Commitments
29

SECTION 2.09. Repayment of Advances
30

SECTION 2.10. Evidence of Indebtedness
30

SECTION 2.11. Interest on Advances
31

SECTION 2.12. Interest Rate Determination
32

SECTION 2.13. Optional Conversion of Advances
32

SECTION 2.14. Optional Prepayments of Advances
33

SECTION 2.15. Increased Costs
33

SECTION 2.16. Illegality
34

SECTION 2.17. Payments and Computations
35

SECTION 2.18. Taxes
36

SECTION 2.19. Sharing of Payments, Etc
40

SECTION 2.20. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders
40

 
 
ARTICLE III CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
42

 
 
SECTION 3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement and
 
                              Initial Extensions of Credit
42

SECTION 3.02. Conditions Precedent to each Extension of Credit
44

 
 
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
44

 
 
SECTION 4.01. Representations and Warranties of the Borrower
44

 
 
ARTICLE V COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER
47

 
 
SECTION 5.01. Affirmative Covenants
47


i


SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants
50

SECTION 5.03. Financial Covenant
52

 
 
ARTICLE VI EVENTS OF DEFAULT
52

 
 
SECTION 6.01. Events of Default
52

SECTION 6.02. Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default
54

 
 
ARTICLE VII THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
55

 
 
SECTION 7.01. Authorization and Action
55

SECTION 7.02. Agent's Reliance, Etc
55

SECTION 7.03. JPMorgan Chase and its Affiliates
56

SECTION 7.04. Lender Credit Decision
56

SECTION 7.05. Indemnification
56

SECTION 7.06. Successor Agent
57

 
 
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS
57

 
 
SECTION 8.01. Amendments, Etc
57

SECTION 8.02. Notices, Etc
58

SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies
60

SECTION 8.04. Costs and Expenses
60

SECTION 8.05. Right of Set-off
62

SECTION 8.06. Binding Effect
62

SECTION 8.07. Assignments and Participations
62

SECTION 8.08. Confidentiality
66

SECTION 8.09. Governing Law
67

SECTION 8.10. Severability; Survival
67

SECTION 8.11. Execution in Counterparts
68

SECTION 8.12. Jurisdiction, Etc
68

SECTION 8.13. Waiver of Jury Trial
68

SECTION 8.14. USA Patriot Act
69

SECTION 8.15. No Fiduciary Duty
69

SECTION 8.16. Defaulting Lenders
69

SECTION 8.17. Cash Collateral
72

SECTION 8.18. Reallocations
73

SECTION 8.19. Amendment and Restatement of Existing Credit Agreement
74


ii


EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES

EXHIBIT A      ---------------      Form of Notice of Borrowing
EXHIBIT B      ---------------      Form of Request for Issuance
EXHIBIT C      ---------------      Form of Assignment and Assumption
EXHIBIT D      ---------------      Form of Opinion of Counsel for the Borrower
EXHIBIT E      ---------------      Form of Opinion of Counsel for the Administrative Agent
EXHIBIT F-1 ---------------      Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Lenders                              That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-2      ---------------      Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Participants                          That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-3      ---------------      Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Participants                          That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
EXHIBIT F-4      ---------------      Form of U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate (For Foreign Lenders                              That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


SCHEDULE I      ---------------      Schedule of Initial Lenders
SCHEDULE 2.04(j) --------      Letters of Credit
SCHEDULE 4.01(m) --------      Schedule of Significant Subsidiaries


iii


THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 10, 2014 (this “ Agreement ”), among AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation (the “ Borrower ”), the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the signatures pages hereof (the “ Initial Lenders ”), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (“ JPMorgan Chase ”), as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders (as hereinafter defined), and the LC Issuing Banks (as hereinafter defined).

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT:

The Borrower has requested that the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks agree, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, to amend and restate in its entirety the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013 (the “ Existing Credit Agreement ”), among the Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders party thereto. The Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks have indicated their willingness to amend and restate the Existing Credit Agreement on the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree that the Existing Credit Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND ACCOUNTING TERMS

Section 1.01. Certain Defined Terms.

As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined):

Administrative Agent ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Administrative Questionnaire ” means an administrative questionnaire in a form supplied by the Administrative Agent.
Advance ” means an advance by a Lender to a Borrower as part of a Borrowing and refers to a Base Rate Advance or a Eurodollar Rate Advance.
Affiliate ” means, as to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person or is a director or officer of such Person. For purposes of this definition, the term “control” (including the terms “controlling”, “controlled by” and “under common control with”) of a Person means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of



2

the management and policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of Voting Stock, by contract or otherwise.
Agent Parties ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(c).
Agent’s Account ” means the account of the Administrative Agent maintained by the Administrative Agent with JPMorgan Chase at its office located at 1111 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas, Account No. 9008113381H0618, Reference: American Electric Power, or such other account of the Administrative Agent as the Administrative Agent may from time to time designate in a written notice to the Lenders and the Borrower.
Anti-Corruption Laws ” means all laws, rules, and regulations of any jurisdiction applicable to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries from time to time concerning or relating to bribery, money laundering or corruption.
Applicable Law ” means (i) all applicable common law and principles of equity and (ii) all applicable provisions of all (A) constitutions, statutes, rules, regulations and orders of governmental bodies, (B) Governmental Approvals and (C) orders, decisions, judgments and decrees of all courts (whether at law or in equity or admiralty) and arbitrators.
Applicable Lending Office ” means, with respect to each Lender, such Lender’s Domestic Lending Office in the case of a Base Rate Advance and such Lender’s Eurodollar Lending Office in the case of a Eurodollar Rate Advance.
Applicable Margin ” means, with respect to any Base Rate Advance and any Eurodollar Rate Advance, at all times during which any Applicable Rating Level set forth below is in effect, the rate per annum (except as provided below) for such Type of Advance set forth below next to such Applicable Rating Level:
Applicable
Rating Level
Applicable Margin
for Eurodollar Rate
Advances
Applicable Margin
for Base Rate
Advances
1
1.000%
0.000%
2
1.125%
0.125%
3
1.250%
0.250%
4
1.500%
0.500%
5
1.750%
0.750%
6
2.000%
1.000%

provided , that the Applicable Margins set forth above shall be increased, for each Applicable Rating Level, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default by 2.00% per annum.


3

Any change in the Applicable Margin resulting from a change in the Applicable Rating Level shall become effective upon the date of announcement of any change in the Moody’s Rating or the S&P Rating that results in such change in the Applicable Rating Level.
Applicable Rating Level ” at any time shall be determined in accordance with the then-applicable S&P Rating and the then-applicable Moody’s Rating as follows:
S&P Rating/Moody’s Rating
Applicable Rating Level
S&P Rating A or higher or Moody’s Rating A2 or higher
1
S&P Rating A- or Moody’s Rating A3
2
S&P Rating BBB+ or Moody’s Rating Baa1
3
S&P Rating BBB or Moody’s Rating Baa2
4
S&P Rating BBB- or Moody’s Rating Baa3
5
S&P Rating BB+ or below or Moody’s Rating Ba1 or below, or no S&P Rating or Moody’s Rating
6

The Applicable Rating Level for any day shall be determined based upon the higher of the S&P Rating and the Moody’s Rating in effect on such day. If the S&P Rating and the Moody’s Rating are not the same ( i.e. , a “split rating”), the higher of such ratings shall control, unless either rating is below BBB- or Baa3 (as applicable), in which case the lower of the two ratings shall control.
Approved Fund ” means any Fund that is administered or managed by (i) a Lender, (ii) an Affiliate of a Lender or (iii) an entity or an Affiliate of an entity that administers or manages a Lender.
Assignee Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.18.
Assignment and Assumption ” means an assignment and assumption entered into by a Lender and an Eligible Assignee (with the consent of any party whose consent is required by Section 8.07), and accepted by the Administrative Agent, in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereto or any other form approved by the Administrative Agent.
Assignor Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.18.
Available Commitment ” means, for each Lender at any time on any day, the unused portion of such Lender’s Commitment, computed after giving effect to all Extensions of Credit made or to be made on such day, the application of proceeds therefrom and all prepayments and repayments of Advances made on such day.
Available Commitments ” means the aggregate of the Lenders’ Available Commitments hereunder.


4

Bankruptcy Event ” means, with respect to any Person, such Person becomes the subject of a proceeding under any Debtor Relief Law, or has had a receiver, custodian, conservator, trustee, administrator, assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar Person charged with reorganization or liquidation of its business or assets (including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other Governmental Authority acting in a similar capacity) appointed for it, or, in the good faith determination of the Administrative Agent, has taken any action in furtherance of, or indicating its consent to, approval of, or acquiescence in, any such proceeding or appointment; provided that, a Bankruptcy Event shall not result solely by virtue of any ownership interest, or acquisition of any equity interest, in such Person by a Governmental Authority so long as such ownership interest does not result in or provide such Person with immunity from the jurisdiction of courts within the United States or from the enforcement of judgments or writs of attachment on its assets or permit such Person (or such Governmental Authority) to reject, repudiate, disavow or disaffirm obligations under any agreement in which it commits to extend credit.
Base Rate ” means a fluctuating interest rate per annum in effect from time to time, which rate per annum shall at all times be equal to the highest of the following rates then in effect:
(i)
the rate of interest announced publicly by JPMorgan Chase in New York City, from time to time, as JPMorgan Chase’s prime commercial lending rate or corporate base rate;

(ii)
1/2 of 1% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate; and

(iii)
the rate of interest per annum equal to the Eurodollar Rate as determined on such day (or if such day is not a Business Day, on the next preceding Business Day) that would be applicable to a Eurodollar Rate Advance having an Interest Period of one month, plus 1%.

Base Rate Advance ” means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.11(a).
Borrower ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Borrowing ” means a borrowing by the Borrower consisting of simultaneous Advances of the same Type, having the same Interest Period and ratably made or Converted on the same day by each of the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.02 or 2.13, as the case may be. All Advances to the Borrower of the same Type, having the same Interest Period and made or Converted on the same day shall be deemed a single Borrowing hereunder until repaid or next Converted.
Borrowing Date ” means the date of any Borrowing.
Business Day ” means a day of the year on which banks are not required or authorized by law to close in New York City and, if the applicable Business Day relates


5

to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, Business Day also includes a day on which dealings are carried out in the London interbank market.
Cash Collateralize ” means, to pledge and deposit with or deliver to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of one or more of the LC Issuing Banks or Lenders, as collateral for LC Outstandings or obligations of Lenders to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings, cash or deposit account balances or, if the Administrative Agent and each applicable LC Issuing Bank shall agree in their sole discretion, other credit support, in each case pursuant to documentation in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and each applicable LC Issuing Bank. “ Cash Collateral ” shall have a meaning correlative to the foregoing and shall include the proceeds of such cash collateral and other credit support.
Change in Law ” means the occurrence, after the date of this Agreement, of any of the following: (a) the adoption or taking effect of any law, rule, regulation or treaty, (b) any change in any law, rule, regulation or treaty or in the administration, interpretation, implementation or application thereof by any Governmental Authority or (c) the making or issuance of any request, rule, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law) by any Governmental Authority; provided that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and all requests, rules, guidelines or directives thereunder or issued in connection therewith and (y) all requests, rules, guidelines or directives promulgated by the Bank for International Settlements, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or any successor or similar authority) or the United States or foreign regulatory authorities, in each case pursuant to Basel III, shall in each case be deemed to be a “Change in Law”, regardless of the date enacted, implemented, adopted or issued.
CGMI ” means Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Citibank ” means Citibank, N.A.
Commitment ” means, for each Lender, the obligation of such Lender to make Advances to the Borrower and to acquire participations in Letters of Credit hereunder in an aggregate amount no greater than the amount set forth on Schedule I hereto or, if such Lender has entered into any Assignment and Assumption, set forth for such Lender in the Register maintained by the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 8.07(c), in each such case as such amount may be reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.08.
Commitment Fee Rate ” means, at any time, the rate per annum set forth below next to the Applicable Rating Level in effect at such time:



6

Applicable
Rating Level
Commitment
Fee Rate
1
0.100%
2
0.125%
3
0.175%
4
0.225%
5
0.275%
6
0.350%

A change in the Commitment Fee Rate resulting from a change in the Applicable Rating Level shall become effective upon the date of public announcement of a change in the Moody’s Rating or the S&P Rating that results in a change in the Applicable Rating Level.

Commitment Percentage ” means, as to any Lender as of any date of determination, the percentage describing such Lender’s pro rata share of the Commitments set forth in the Register from time to time; provided that in the case of Section 8.16 when a Defaulting Lender shall exist, “ Commitment Percentage ” means the percentage of the total Commitments (disregarding any Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) represented by such Lender’s Commitment. If the Commitments have terminated or expired, the Commitment Percentages shall be determined based upon the Commitments most recently in effect, giving effect to any assignments and to any Lender’s status as a Defaulting Lender at the time of determination.

Commitments ” means the aggregate of the Lenders’ Commitments hereunder.

Communications ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(b).

Confidential Information ” means information that the Borrower furnishes to the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers or any Lender in a writing designated as confidential, but does not include any such information that is or becomes generally available to the public or that is or becomes available to the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers or such Lender from a source other than the Borrower.

Connection Income Taxes ” means Other Connection Taxes that are imposed on or measured by overall gross receipts or income, or net income (however denominated) or that are franchise Taxes, privilege Taxes, license Taxes or branch profits Taxes.

Consolidated Capital ” means the sum of (i) Consolidated Debt of the Borrower and (ii) the consolidated equity of all classes of stock (whether common, preferred, mandatorily convertible preferred or preference) of the Borrower, in each case determined in accordance with GAAP, but including Equity-Preferred Securities issued by the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries and excluding the funded pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net of tax, components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).


7

Consolidated Debt ” of the Borrower means the total principal amount of all Debt described in clauses (i) through (v) of the definition of Debt and Guaranties of such Debt of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries, excluding, however, (i) Debt of AEP Credit, Inc. that is non-recourse to the Borrower, (ii) Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds, and (iii) Equity-Preferred Securities not to exceed 10% of Consolidated Capital (calculated for purposes of this clause without reference to any Equity-Preferred Securities); provided that Guaranties of Debt included in the total principal amount of Consolidated Debt shall not be added to such total principal amount.
Consolidated Subsidiary ” means, with respect to any Person at any time, any Subsidiary or other Person the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of such first Person in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Tangible Net Assets ” means, on any date of determination and with respect to any Person at any time, the total of all assets (including revaluations thereof as a result of commercial appraisals, price level restatement or otherwise) appearing on the consolidated balance sheet of such Person and its Consolidated Subsidiaries most recently delivered to the Lenders pursuant to Section 5.01(i) as of such date of determination, net of applicable reserves and deductions, but excluding goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents, unamortized debt discount and all other like intangible assets (which term shall not be construed to include such revaluations), less the aggregate of the consolidated current liabilities of such Person and its Consolidated Subsidiaries appearing on such balance sheet.
Convert ”, “ Conversion ” and “ Converted ” each refers to a conversion of Advances of one Type into Advances of the other Type, or the selection of a new, or the renewal of the same, Interest Period for Eurodollar Rate Advances, pursuant to Section 2.12 or 2.13.
Credit Party ” means the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender.
Debt ” of any Person means, without duplication, (i) all indebtedness of such Person for borrowed money, (ii) all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than trade payables not overdue by more than 60 days incurred in the ordinary course of such Person’s business), (iii) all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures or other similar instruments, (iv) all obligations of such Person as lessee under leases that have been, in accordance with GAAP, recorded as capital leases, including, without limitation, the leases described in clause (iv) of Section 5.02(c), (v) all obligations of such Person in respect of reimbursement agreements with respect to acceptances, letters of credit (other than trade letters of credit) or similar extensions of credit, (vi) all Guaranties and (vii) all reasonably quantifiable obligations under indemnities or under support or capital contribution agreements, and other reasonably quantifiable obligations (contingent or otherwise) to purchase or otherwise to assure a creditor against loss in respect of, or to assure an obligee against loss in respect of, all Debt of others referred to in clauses (i) through (vi) above guaranteed directly or indirectly in any manner by such Person, or in effect


8

guaranteed directly or indirectly by such Person through an agreement (A) to pay or purchase such Debt or to advance or supply funds for the payment or purchase of such Debt, (B) to purchase, sell or lease (as lessee or lessor) property, or to purchase or sell services, primarily for the purpose of enabling the debtor to make payment of such Debt or to assure the holder of such Debt against loss, (C) to supply funds to or in any other manner invest in the debtor (including any agreement to pay for property or services irrespective of whether such property is received or such services are rendered) or (D) otherwise to assure a creditor against loss.
Debtor Relief Laws ” means the Bankruptcy Code of the United States of America, and all other liquidation, conservatorship, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors, moratorium, rearrangement, receivership, insolvency, reorganization, or similar debtor relief laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdictions from time to time in effect.
Declining Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.06(b).
Default ” means any Event of Default or any event that would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or time elapse or both.
Defaulting Lender ” means, subject to Section 8.16(b), any Lender that (i) has failed to (A) fund all or any portion of its Advances within two Business Days of the date such Advances were required to be funded hereunder unless such Lender notifies the Administrative Agent and the Borrower in writing that such failure is the result of such Lender’s good faith determination that one or more conditions precedent to funding (each of which conditions precedent, together with any applicable Default, shall be specifically identified in such writing) has not been satisfied, or (B) pay to any Credit Party any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder (including in respect of its participation in Letters of Credit) within two Business Days of the date when due, (ii) has notified the Borrower or any Credit Party in writing that it does not intend to comply with its funding obligations hereunder or generally under other agreements in which it commits to extend credit, or has made a public statement to that effect (unless such writing or public statement relates to such Lender’s obligation to fund an Advance hereunder and states that such position is based on such Lender’s good faith determination that a condition precedent to funding (which condition precedent, together with any applicable Default, shall be specifically identified in such writing or public statement) cannot be satisfied), (iii) has failed, within three Business Days after written request by the Administrative Agent or the Borrower, to confirm in writing to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower that it will comply with its prospective funding obligations hereunder ( provided that, such Lender shall cease to be a Defaulting Lender pursuant to this clause (iii) upon receipt of such written confirmation by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower), or (iv) has become the subject of a Bankruptcy Event. Any determination by the Administrative Agent that a Lender is a Defaulting Lender under any one or more of clauses (i) through (iv) above shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error, and such Lender shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender (subject to Section 8.16(b)) upon delivery of written notice of such determination to the Borrower, each LC Issuing Bank, and each Lender.


9

“Departing Lender” means each “Lender” under the Existing Credit Agreement that is not continuing as an Initial Lender under this Agreement upon the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date.
Designated Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.07(a).
Disclosure Documents ” means the Borrower’s Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Borrower’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the SEC, for the periods ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, and the Borrower’s Current Reports on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC after the date of filing the Borrower’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014 but prior to the date hereof.
Dollars ” and the symbol “$” mean lawful currency of the United States of America.
Domestic Lending Office ” means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its “Domestic Lending Office” on such Lender’s Administrative Questionnaire or in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify in writing to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Eligible Assignee ” means any Person that meets the requirements to be an assignee under Section 8.07(b)(iii), (v) and (vi) (subject to such consents, if any, as may be required under Section 8.07(b)(iii)).
Environmental Action ” means any action, suit, demand, demand letter, claim, notice of non-compliance or violation, notice of liability or potential liability, investigation, proceeding, consent order or consent agreement relating in any way to any Environmental Law, Environmental Permit or Hazardous Materials or arising from alleged injury or threat of injury to health, safety or the environment, including, without limitation, (i) by any Governmental Authority for enforcement, cleanup, removal, response, remedial or other actions or damages and (ii) by any Governmental Authority or any third party for damages, contribution, indemnification, cost recovery, compensation or injunctive relief.
Environmental Law ” means any federal, state, local or foreign statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, order, judgment, decree or judicial or agency interpretation, policy or guidance relating to pollution or protection of the environment, health, safety or natural resources, including, without limitation, those relating to the use, handling, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal, release or discharge of Hazardous Materials.
Environmental Permit ” means any permit, approval, identification number, license or other authorization required under any Environmental Law.
Equity-Preferred Securities ” means (i) debt or preferred securities that are mandatorily convertible or mandatorily exchangeable into common shares of the


10

Borrower and (ii) any other securities, however denominated, including but not limited to hybrid capital and trust originated preferred securities, (A) issued by the Borrower or any Consolidated Subsidiary of the Borrower, (B) that are not subject to mandatory redemption or the underlying securities, if any, of which are not subject to mandatory redemption, (C) that are perpetual or mature no less than 30 years from the date of issuance, (D) the indebtedness issued in connection with which, including any guaranty, is subordinate in right of payment to the unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the issuer of such indebtedness or guaranty, and (E) the terms of which permit the deferral of the payment of interest or distributions thereon to a date occurring after the Termination Date.
ERISA ” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder.
ERISA Affiliate ” means, with respect to any Person, each trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that is considered to be a single employer with such entity within the meaning of Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) the Internal Revenue Code.
ERISA Event ” means (i) the termination of or withdrawal from any Plan by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates, (ii) the failure by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates to comply with ERISA or the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to any Plan or (iii) the failure by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries to comply with Applicable Law with respect to any Foreign Plan.
Eurocurrency Liabilities ” has the meaning assigned to that term in Regulation D of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
Eurodollar Lending Office ” means, with respect to any Lender, the office of such Lender specified as its “Eurodollar Lending Office” on such Lender’s Administrative Questionnaire or in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender (or, if no such office is specified, its Domestic Lending Office), or such other office of such Lender as such Lender may from time to time specify in writing to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
Eurodollar Rate ” means, for any Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance comprising part of the same Borrowing, the London interbank offered rate (rounded upward to the nearest 1/16 th of 1%) as administered by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (or any other Person that takes over the administration of such rate) for deposits in immediately available funds in Dollars for a period equal in length to such Interest Period as displayed on page LIBOR01 of the Reuters screen that displays such rate (or, in the event such rate does not appear on a Reuters page or screen, on any successor or substitute Reuters page or screen that displays such rate, or on the appropriate page or screen of such other comparable information service that publishes such rate from time to time as selected by the Administrative Agent in its discretion) (in each case, the “ Screen Rate ”) at approximately 11:00 A.M. (London time) two Business Days before the first day of such Interest Period, provided , that if the Screen Rate shall be


11

less than zero, such rate shall be deemed to be zero for the purposes of this Agreement, and provided, further , if the Screen Rate shall not be available at such time for such Interest Period (an “ Impacted Interest Period ”), the Eurodollar Rate for such Borrowing shall be the Interpolated Rate, provided , that if any Interpolated Rate shall be less than zero, such rate shall be deemed to be zero for purposes of this Agreement.
Eurodollar Rate Advance ” means an Advance that bears interest as provided in Section 2.11(b).
Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage ” of any Lender for any Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance means the reserve percentage applicable to such Lender during such Interest Period (or if more than one such percentage shall be so applicable, the daily average of such percentages for those days in such Interest Period during which any such percentage shall be so applicable) under regulations issued from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (or any successor) for determining the maximum reserve requirement (including, without limitation, any emergency, supplemental or other marginal reserve requirement) then applicable to such Lender with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities (or with respect to any other category of liabilities that includes deposits by reference to which the interest rate on Eurodollar Rate Advances is determined) having a term equal to such Interest Period.
Events of Default ” has the meaning specified in Section 6.01.
Exchange Act ” has the meaning specified in Section 6.01(f).
Excluded Taxes ” means any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to a Recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to a Recipient, (a) Taxes imposed on or measured by overall gross receipts or income, or net income (however denominated), franchise Taxes, privilege Taxes, license Taxes or branch profits Taxes, in each case, (i) imposed as a result of such Recipient being organized under the laws of, or having its principal office or, in the case of any Lender, its Applicable Lending Office located in, the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (or any political subdivision thereof) or (ii) that are Other Connection Taxes, (b) in the case of a Lender, U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed on amounts payable to or for the account of such Lender with respect to an applicable interest in an Advance or Commitment pursuant to a law in effect on the date on which (i) such Lender acquires such interest in the Advance or Commitment (other than pursuant to an assignment request by the Borrower under Section 2.20(b)) or (ii) such Lender changes its Applicable Lending Office, except in each case to the extent that, pursuant to Section 2.18, amounts with respect to such Taxes were payable either to such Lender’s assignor immediately before such Lender became a party hereto or to such Lender immediately before it changed its Applicable Lending Office, (c) Taxes attributable to such Recipient’s failure to comply with Section 2.18(g) and (d) any U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA.
Existing Credit Agreement ” has the meaning specified in the Preliminary Statement in this Agreement.


12

Extension Effective Date ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.06(c).
Extension of Credit ” means the making of a Borrowing, the issuance of a Letter of Credit or the amendment of any Letter of Credit having the effect of extending the stated termination date thereof or increasing the maximum amount available to be drawn thereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, a Conversion shall not constitute an Extension of Credit.
FATCA ” means Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Internal Revenue Code, as of the date of this Agreement (or any amended or successor version that is substantively comparable and not materially more onerous to comply with), any current or future regulations or official interpretations thereof, any agreement entered into pursuant to Section 1471(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, and any intergovernmental agreement entered into in connection with such sections of the Internal Revenue Code and any legislation, law, regulation or practice enacted or promulgated pursuant to such intergovernmental agreement.
Federal Funds Rate ” means, for any period, a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal for each day during such period to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the next preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day that is a Business Day, the average of the quotations for such day on such transactions received by the Administrative Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by it.
Foreign Lender ” means a Lender that is not a U.S. Person.
Foreign Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).
Fronting Exposure ” means, at any time there is a Defaulting Lender, with respect to any LC Issuing Bank, such Defaulting Lender’s Commitment Percentage of the LC Outstandings with respect to Letters of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank, other than LC Outstandings as to which such Defaulting Lender’s participation obligation has been reallocated to other Lenders or Cash Collateralized in accordance with the terms hereof.
Fund ” means any Person (other than a natural Person) that is (or will be) engaged in making, purchasing, holding or otherwise investing in commercial loans, bonds and similar extensions of credit in the ordinary course of its activities.
GAAP ” has the meaning specified in Section 1.03.
GenCo ” means AEP Generation Resources Inc.
Governmental Approval ” means any authorization, consent, approval, license or exemption of, registration or filing with, or report or notice to, any Governmental Authority.


13

Governmental Authority ” means the government of the United States of America or any other nation, or of any political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra-national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank).
Guaranty ” of any Person means any obligation, contingent or otherwise, of such Person (i) to pay any Debt of any other Person or (ii) incurred in connection with the issuance by a third person of a Guaranty of Debt of any other Person (whether such obligation arises by agreement to reimburse or indemnify such third Person or otherwise).
Hazardous Materials ” means (i) petroleum and petroleum products, byproducts or breakdown products, radioactive materials, asbestos-containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls and radon gas and (ii) any other chemicals, materials or substances designated, classified or regulated as hazardous or toxic or as a pollutant or contaminant under any Environmental Law.
“Impacted Interest Period” has the meaning specified for such term in the definition herein of “Eurodollar Rate.”
Indemnified Party ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.04(b).
Indemnified Taxes ” means (a) Taxes, other than Excluded Taxes, imposed on or with respect to any payment made by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document and (b) to the extent not otherwise described in (a), Other Taxes.
Initial Lenders ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.
Interest Period ” means, for each Eurodollar Rate Advance comprising part of the same Borrowing, the period commencing on the date of such Eurodollar Rate Advance or the date of the Conversion of any Base Rate Advance into such Eurodollar Rate Advance and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below and, thereafter, with respect to Eurodollar Rate Advances, each subsequent period commencing on the last day of the immediately preceding Interest Period and ending on the last day of the period selected by the Borrower pursuant to the provisions below. The duration of each such Interest Period shall be one, two, three or six months (or, for any Borrowing, any period specified by the Borrower that is shorter than one month, if all Lenders agree), as the Borrower may, upon notice received by the Administrative Agent not later than 11:00 A.M. on the third Business Day prior to the first day of such Interest Period, select; provided, however, that:
(i)
the Borrower may not select any Interest Period that ends after the Termination Date of any Lender;


14

(ii)
Interest Periods commencing on the same date for Eurodollar Rate Advances comprising part of the same Borrowing shall be of the same duration;
(iii)
whenever the last day of any Interest Period would otherwise occur on a day other than a Business Day, the last day of such Interest Period shall be extended to occur on the next succeeding Business Day, provided, however, that, if such extension would cause the last day of such Interest Period to occur in the next following calendar month, the last day of such Interest Period shall occur on the next preceding Business Day; and
(iv)
whenever the first day of any Interest Period occurs on a day of an initial calendar month for which there is no numerically corresponding day in the calendar month that succeeds such initial calendar month by the number of months equal to the number of months in such Interest Period, such Interest Period shall end on the last Business Day of such succeeding calendar month.

Internal Revenue Code ” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated and rulings issued thereunder.

“Interpolated Rate” means, at any time, for any Interest Period, the rate per annum (rounded upward to the nearest 1/16 th of 1%) determined by the Administrative Agent (which determination shall be conclusive and binding absent manifest error) to be equal to the rate that results from interpolating on a linear basis between: (a) the Screen Rate for the longest period for which the Screen Rate is available for the Eurodollar Rate Advance that is shorter than the Impacted Interest Period; and (b) the Screen Rate for the shortest period for which the Screen Rate is available for the Eurodollar Rate Advance that exceeds the Impacted Interest Period, in each case, at such time.

IRS ” means the United States Internal Revenue Service.

Joint Lead Arrangers ” means JPMS, CGMI, KeyBank and RBSSI.

JPMorgan Chase ” has the meaning specified in the recital of parties to this Agreement.

JPMS ” means J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.

KeyBank ” means KeyBank National Association.

LC Collateral Account ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(b).

LC Fee ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.05(c).

LC Issuing Bank ” means, as to any Letter of Credit, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, KeyBank, RBS, and any Lender or Affiliate of a Lender that shall agree to issue a Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 2.04.


15

LC Outstandings ” means, on any date of determination, the sum of (i) the undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date plus (ii) the aggregate principal amount of all unpaid reimbursement obligations of the Borrower on such date with respect to payments made by any LC Issuing Bank under any Letter of Credit (excluding reimbursement obligations that have been repaid with the proceeds of any Borrowing).
LC Payment Notice ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(e).
Lenders ” means, at any time, collectively, (i) the Initial Lenders (other than any such Initial Lenders that have previously assigned all of their respective Advances and Commitments to other Persons in accordance with Section 8.07(b) at such time), and (ii) any other Persons that have become Lenders holding Advances and/or Commitments at such time in accordance with Section 8.07(b).
Letter of Credit ” means any standby letters of credit issued by an LC Issuing Bank pursuant to Section 2.04.
Lien ” means any lien, security interest or other charge or encumbrance of any kind, or any other type of preferential arrangement, including, without limitation, the lien or retained security title of a conditional vendor and any easement, right of way or other encumbrance on title to real property.
Loan Documents ” means, collectively, (i) the Commitment Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, JPMS, JPMorgan Chase, CGMI, KeyBank, RBSSI, and RBS, (ii) the Fee Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, JPMS, JPMorgan Chase and Barclays Bank PLC, (iii) the Fee Letter, dated as of October 20, 2014, among the Borrower, CGMI, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, KeyBank, RBSSI, RBS, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, (iv) the Fee Letter, dated as of June 30, 2011, among the Borrower, JPMS and the Administrative Agent, (v) this Agreement and (vi) each promissory note issued pursuant to Section 2.10(d), in each case, as any of the foregoing may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.
Margin Regulations ” means Regulations T, U and X of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as in effect from time to time.
Margin Stock ” has the meaning specified in the Margin Regulations.
Material Adverse Change ” means any material adverse change (i) in the business, condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) that is reasonably likely to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement against the Borrower or the ability of the Borrower to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
Material Adverse Effect ” means a material adverse effect (i) on the business, condition (financial or otherwise) or operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries,


16

taken as a whole, or (ii) that is reasonably likely to affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement against the Borrower or the ability of the Borrower to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
Minimum Collateral Amount ” means, at any time, (i) with respect to Cash Collateral consisting of cash or deposit account balances, an amount equal to 103% of the Fronting Exposure of all LC Issuing Banks with respect to Letters of Credit issued and outstanding at such time and (ii) otherwise, an amount determined by the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks in their reasonable discretion.
Moody’s ” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Moody’s Rating ” means, on any date of determination, the debt rating most recently announced by Moody’s with respect to the long-term senior unsecured debt issued by the Borrower.
Multiemployer Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).
Non-Consenting Lender ” means any Lender that does not approve any consent, waiver or amendment that (i) requires the approval of all Lenders in accordance with the terms of Section 8.01 and (ii) has been approved by the Required Lenders.
Non-Defaulting Lender ” means, at any time, each Lender that is not a Defaulting Lender at such time.
non-performing Lender ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.04(f).
Notice of Borrowing ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.02(a).
Other Connection Taxes ” means, with respect to any Recipient, Taxes imposed as a result of a present or former connection between such Recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (other than connections arising from such Recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any Loan Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Advance, Commitment or Loan Document).
Other Taxes ” means all present or future stamp, court or documentary, intangible, recording, filing or similar Taxes that arise from any payment made under, from the execution, delivery, performance, enforcement or registration of, from the receipt or perfection of a security interest under, or otherwise with respect to, any Loan Document, except any such Taxes that are Other Connection Taxes imposed with respect to an assignment (other than an assignment made pursuant to Section 2.20(b)).
Outstanding Credits ” means, on any date of determination, the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all Advances outstanding on such date plus (ii) the LC Outstandings on such date.


17

Parent ” means, with respect to any Lender, any Person as to which such Lender is, directly or indirectly, a subsidiary.
Participant ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(d).
Participant Register ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(d).
Patriot Act ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.14.
Permitted Liens ” means such of the following as to which no enforcement, collection, execution, levy or foreclosure proceeding shall have been commenced: (i) Liens for taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies to the extent not required to be paid under Section 5.01(g) hereof; (ii) Liens imposed by law, such as materialmen’s, mechanics’, carriers’, workmen’s and repairmen’s Liens, and other similar Liens arising in the ordinary course of business securing obligations that are not overdue for a period of more than 30 days or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings; (iii) Liens incurred or deposits made to secure obligations under workers’ compensation laws or similar legislation or to secure public or statutory obligations; (iv) easements, rights of way and other encumbrances on title to real property that do not render title to the property encumbered thereby unmarketable or materially adversely affect the use of such property for its present purposes; (v) any judgment Lien, unless an Event of Default under Section 6.01(g) shall have occurred and be continuing; (vi) any Lien on any asset of any Person existing at the time such Person is merged or consolidated with or into the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary and not created in contemplation of such event; (vii) deposits made in the ordinary course of business to secure the performance of bids, trade contracts (other than for Debt), operating leases and surety bonds; (viii) Liens upon or in any real property or equipment acquired, constructed, improved or held by the Borrower or any Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business to secure the purchase price of such property or equipment or to secure Debt incurred solely for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction or improvement of such property or equipment, or Liens existing on such property or equipment at the time of its acquisition (other than any such Liens created in contemplation of such acquisition that were not incurred to finance the acquisition of such property); (ix) extensions, renewals or replacements of any Lien described in clause (iii), (vi), (vii) or (viii) for the same or a lesser amount, provided, however, that no such Lien shall extend to or cover any properties not theretofore subject to the Lien being extended, renewed or replaced; and (x) any other Lien not covered by the foregoing exceptions as long as immediately after the creation of such Lien the aggregate principal amount of Debt secured by all Liens created or assumed under this clause (x) does not exceed 10% of Consolidated Tangible Net Assets of the Borrower.
Person ” means an individual, partnership, corporation (including a business trust), joint stock company, trust, unincorporated association, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity, or a government or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
Plan ” has the meaning specified in Section 4.01(i).


18

Platform ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.02(b).
Proposed Increased Commitment ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.07(a).
RBS ” means The Royal Bank of Scotland plc.
RBSSI ” means RBS Securities Inc.
Recipient ” means (a) the Administrative Agent, (b) any Lender and (c) any LC Issuing Bank, as applicable.
Register ” has the meaning specified in Section 8.07(c).
Related Parties ” means, with respect to any Person, such Person’s Affiliates and the partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, trustees, administrators, managers, advisors and representatives of such Person and of such Person’s Affiliates.
Request for Issuance ” means a request made pursuant to Section 2.04 in the form of Exhibit B.
Required Lenders ” means at any time Lenders owed in excess of 50% of the Outstanding Credits at such time, or, if there are no Outstanding Credits, Lenders having in excess of 50% in interest of the Commitments in effect at such time. Subject to Section 8.01, the Outstanding Credits and Commitments of any Defaulting Lender shall be disregarded in determining Required Lenders at any time.
“Restatement Effective Date” has the meaning specified in Section 3.1.
Restructuring Law ” means Texas Senate Bill 7, as enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas and signed into law on June 18, 1999, Ohio Senate Bill No. 3, as enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio and signed into law on July 6, 1999, or any similar law applicable to the Borrower or any Subsidiary of the Borrower governing the deregulation or restructuring of the electric power industry.
RTO Transaction ” means the transfer of transmission facilities to a regional transmission organization or equivalent organization as approved or ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
S&P ” means Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
S&P Rating ” means, on any date of determination, the rating most recently announced by S&P with respect to the long-term senior unsecured debt issued by the Borrower.
Sanctions ” means economic or financial sanctions or trade embargoes imposed, administered or enforced from time to time by (a) the U.S. government, including those administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the


19

Treasury or by the U.S. Department of State, or (b) the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, any EU member state, or Her Majesty’s Treasury of the United Kingdom.
Sanctioned Country ” means, at any time of determination, a country or territory which is the subject or target of any Sanctions.
Sanctioned Person ” means, at any time of determination, (a) any Person listed in any Sanctions-related list of designated Persons maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or any EU member state, (b) any Person operating, organized or resident in a Sanctioned Country, (c) any Person owned or controlled by or acting on behalf of any such Person described in the preceding clause (a) or (b), or (d) any Person with which, to the Borrower’s actual knowledge, any Lender is prohibited under Sanctions relevant to it from dealing or engaging in transactions. For purposes of the foregoing, control of a Person shall be deemed to include where a Sanctioned Person (i) owns or has power to vote 25% or more of the issued and outstanding equity interests having ordinary voting power for the election of directors of the Person or other individuals performing similar functions for the Person, or (ii) has the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Person, whether by ownership of equity interests, contracts or otherwise.
SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Significant Subsidiary ” means, at any time, any Subsidiary of the Borrower that constitutes at such time a “significant subsidiary” of the Borrower, as such term is defined in Regulation S-X of the SEC as in effect on the date hereof (17 C.F.R. Part 210) (other than GenCo and any other Subsidiary of the Borrower (other than the Existing Utility Subsidiaries (as defined below)) to which generation assets are being transferred in connection with the corporate separation of Ohio Power Company’s generation assets); provided , however , that if GenCo and the other Subsidiaries of the Borrower (excluding, solely for purposes of this calculation, the Existing Utility Subsidiaries) own, on an aggregate basis, generation assets exceeding 20% of the Borrower’s “total assets” as used in Regulation S-X, GenCo and each such Subsidiary that otherwise constitutes a “significant subsidiary” of the Borrower under Regulation S-X will be considered Significant Subsidiaries, and provided , further , that “total assets” as used in Regulation S-X shall not include securitization transition assets, phase-in cost assets or similar assets on the balance sheet of any Subsidiary resulting from the issuance of transition bonds or other asset backed securities of a similar nature. As used in this definition, “ Existing Utility Subsidiaries ” means each of AEP Generating Company, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power Company, Wheeling Power Company, AEP Texas North Company and AEP Texas Central Company.
Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds ” means securities, however denominated, that are issued by the Borrower or any Consolidated Subsidiary of the Borrower that are (i)


20

non-recourse to the Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries (other than for failure to collect and pay over the charges referred to in clause (ii) below) and (ii) payable solely from transition or similar charges authorized by law (including, without limitation, any “financing order”, as such term is defined in the Texas Utilities Code) to be invoiced to customers of any Subsidiary of the Borrower or to retail electric providers.
Subsidiary ” of any Person means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust or estate of which (or in which) more than 50% of (i) the issued and outstanding capital stock having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of directors of such corporation (irrespective of whether at the time capital stock of any other class or classes of such corporation shall or might have voting power upon the occurrence of any contingency), (ii) the interest in the capital or profits of such limited liability company, partnership or joint venture or (iii) the beneficial interest in such trust or estate is at the time directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person, by such Person and one or more of its other Subsidiaries or by one or more of such Person’s other Subsidiaries.
Taxes ” means all present or future taxes, levies, imposts, duties, deductions, withholdings (including backup withholding), assessments, fees or other charges imposed by any Governmental Authority, including any interest, additions to tax or penalties applicable thereto.
Termination Date ” means the earlier to occur of (i) June 23, 2017 or such later date that may be established for any Lender from time to time pursuant to Section 2.06 hereof, and (ii) the date of termination in whole of the Commitments available to the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.08 or 6.01.
Type ” refers to the distinction between Advances bearing interest at the Base Rate and Advances bearing interest at the Eurodollar Rate.
U.S. Person ” means any Person that is a “United States Person” as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Internal Revenue Code.
U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ” has the meaning specified in Section 2.18(g)(ii)(B)(iii).
Voting Stock ” means capital stock issued by a corporation, or equivalent interests in any other Person, the holders of which are ordinarily, in the absence of contingencies, entitled to vote for the election of directors (or Persons performing similar functions) of such Person, even if the right so to vote has been suspended by the happening of such a contingency.
Withholding Agent ” means the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.


21

SECTION 1.02. Computation of Time Periods.
  
In this Agreement in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word “from” means “from and including” and the words “to” and “until” each mean “to but excluding”.
SECTION 1.03. Accounting Terms.
  
All accounting terms not specifically defined herein shall be construed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01(f) (“ GAAP ”).
  
SECTION 1.04. Other Interpretive Provisions.
  
As used herein, except as otherwise specified herein, (i) references to any Person include its successors and assigns and, in the case of any Governmental Authority, any Person succeeding to its functions and capacities; (ii) references to any Applicable Law include amendments, supplements and successors thereto; (iii) references to specific sections, articles, annexes, schedules and exhibits are to this Agreement; (iv) words importing any gender include the other gender; (v) the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular; (vi) the words “including”, “include” and “includes” shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation”; (vii) captions and headings are for ease of reference only and shall not affect the construction hereof; and (viii) references to any time of day shall be to New York City time unless otherwise specified.
ARTICLE II
AMOUNTS AND TERMS OF THE ADVANCES

SECTION 2.01. The Advances.
  
(a) Each Lender severally agrees, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, to make Advances to the Borrower and to participate in Letters of Credit from time to time on any Business Day during the period from the date hereof until the Termination Date in an aggregate outstanding amount not to exceed at any time such Lender’s Available Commitment at such time. Within the limits of each Lender’s Commitment and as hereinabove and hereinafter provided, the Borrower may request Borrowings hereunder, and repay or prepay Advances pursuant to Section 2.14 and utilize the resulting increase in the Available Commitments for further Borrowings in accordance with the terms hereof.
  
(b) In no event shall the Borrower be entitled to request or receive any Borrowing that would cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits (including such requested Borrowing) to exceed the Commitments.

SECTION 2.02. Making the Advances.
  
(a)    Each Borrowing shall be in an amount not less than $10,000,000 (or, if less, the Available Commitments at such time) or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and shall consist of Advances of the same Type made on the same day by the Lenders ratably


22

according to their respective Commitment Percentages. Each Borrowing shall be made on notice, given not later than 11:00 A.M. on the third Business Day prior to the date of the proposed Borrowing in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Eurodollar Rate Advances, or not later than 1:00 P.M. on the date of the proposed Borrowing in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Base Rate Advances, by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, which shall give to each Lender prompt written notice. Each such notice of a Borrowing under this Section 2.02 (a “ Notice of Borrowing ”) shall be by telephone, confirmed immediately in writing, or fax in substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto, specifying therein the requested (i) Borrowing Date for such Borrowing, (ii) Type of Advances comprising such Borrowing, (iii) aggregate amount of such Borrowing, and (iv) in the case of a Borrowing consisting of Eurodollar Rate Advances, the initial Interest Period for each such Advance. Each Lender shall, before 3:00 P.M. on the applicable Borrowing Date, make available for the account of its Applicable Lending Office to the Administrative Agent at the Agent’s Account, in same day funds, such Lender’s ratable portion of the Borrowing to be made on such Borrowing Date. After the Administrative Agent’s receipt of such funds and upon fulfillment of the applicable conditions set forth in Article III, the Administrative Agent will promptly make such funds available to the Borrower in such manner as the Borrower shall have specified in the applicable Notice of Borrowing and as shall be reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent.

(b)    Anything in subsection (a) above to the contrary notwithstanding, (i) the Borrower may not select Eurodollar Rate Advances for any Borrowing if the aggregate amount of such Borrowing is less than $10,000,000 or if the obligation of the Lenders to make Eurodollar Rate Advances shall then be suspended pursuant to Section 2.12(b), 2.12(e) or 2.16, and (ii) there shall be not more than 20 Borrowings at any one time outstanding.
  
(c) Each Notice of Borrowing shall be irrevocable and binding on the Borrower. In the case of any Borrowing that the related Notice of Borrowing specifies is to comprise Eurodollar Rate Advances, the Borrower shall indemnify each Lender against any loss, cost or expense incurred by such Lender as a result of any failure to fulfill on or before the date specified in such Notice of Borrowing for such Borrowing the applicable conditions set forth in Article III, including, without limitation, any loss (including loss of anticipated profits), cost or expense incurred by reason of the liquidation or reemployment of deposits or other funds acquired by such Lender to fund the Advance to be made by such Lender as part of such Borrowing when such Advance, as a result of such failure, is not made on such date.
  
(d) Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice by courier or fax from a Lender prior to any Borrowing Date or, in the case of a Base Rate Advance, prior to the time of Borrowing, that such Lender will not make available to the Administrative Agent such Lender’s Advance as part of the Borrowing to be made on such Borrowing Date, the Administrative Agent may assume that such Lender has made such portion available to the Administrative Agent on such Borrowing Date in accordance with subsection (a) of this Section 2.02, and the Administrative Agent may (but it shall not be required to), in reliance upon such assumption, make available to the Borrower on such date a corresponding amount. If and to the extent that such Lender shall not have so made such Advance available to the Administrative Agent, such Lender and the Borrower severally agree to repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such corresponding amount, together with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is made available to the Borrower until the date such amount is repaid to the


23

Administrative Agent, at (i) in the case of the Borrower, the interest rate applicable at the time to Advances comprising such Borrowing and (ii) in the case of such Lender, the Federal Funds Rate. If such Lender shall repay to the Administrative Agent such corresponding amount, such amount so repaid shall constitute such Lender’s Advance as part of such Borrowing for purposes of this Agreement.
  
(e) The failure of any Lender to make the Advance to be made by it as part of any Borrowing shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation, if any, hereunder to make its Advance on the date of such Borrowing, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender to make the Advance to be made by such other Lender on the date of any Borrowing.
  
SECTION 2.03. [Reserved].

SECTION 2.04. Letters of Credit.

(a)    Each of JPMorgan Chase, RBS, Citibank and KeyBank has severally agreed to act as an LC Issuing Bank and, in such capacity, each has severally agreed to issue Letters of Credit having an aggregate face amount not greater than $75,000,000 for each such LC Issuing Bank. The Borrower may also from time to time appoint one or more Lenders (with the consent of any such Lender, which consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of each Lender) to act, either directly or through an Affiliate of such Lender, as an LC Issuing Bank hereunder. Any such appointment and the terms thereof shall be evidenced in a separate written agreement executed by the Borrower and the relevant LC Issuing Bank, a copy of which agreement shall be delivered by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent. The Administrative Agent shall give prompt notice of any such appointment to the other Lenders. Upon such appointment, if and for so long as such Lender shall have any obligation to issue any Letters of Credit hereunder or any Letter of Credit issued by such Lender shall remain outstanding, such Lender shall be deemed to be, and shall have all the rights and obligations of, an “LC Issuing Bank” under this Agreement.

(b)    Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, each Letter of Credit shall be issued (or the stated maturity thereof extended or terms thereof modified or amended) on not less than two Business Days’ prior notice thereof by delivery of a Request for Issuance to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly distribute copies thereof to the Lenders) and the relevant LC Issuing Bank for the account of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries; provided that the Borrower shall be the account party for the purposes of this Agreement and shall have the reimbursement obligations with respect thereto. Each Letter of Credit shall be issued in a form acceptable to the LC Issuing Bank. Each Request for Issuance shall specify (i) the identity of the relevant LC Issuing Bank, (ii) the date (which shall be a Business Day) of issuance of such Letter of Credit (or the date of effectiveness of such extension, modification or amendment) and the stated expiry date thereof (which shall be not more than one year after the date of issuance, provided , that if the expiry date of such Letter of Credit is later than the Termination Date of any Lender, the Borrower will no later than (x) five Business Days prior to such Termination Date if the Borrower’s Applicable Rating Level is 5 or above and (y) 15 days prior to such Termination Date if the Borrower’s Applicable Rating Level is 6, deposit in an account designated with the Administrative Agent (the “ LC Collateral Account ”), in the name of the Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the applicable Lenders and the applicable LC Issuing Banks, in same day


24

funds, an amount equal to the product of (A) 1.03 times the aggregate undrawn stated amount of such Letter of Credit and (B) the Commitment Percentage of the Commitments expiring on such Termination Date), (iii) the proposed stated amount of such Letter of Credit (which amount shall not (A) be less than $100,000 and (B) be subject to any automatic increase provisions), (iv) the name and address of the beneficiary of such Letter of Credit and (v) a statement of drawing conditions applicable to such Letter of Credit, and if such Request for Issuance relates to an amendment or modification of a Letter of Credit, it shall be accompanied by the consent of the beneficiary of the Letter of Credit thereto. Each Request for Issuance shall be irrevocable unless modified or rescinded by the Borrower not less than two days prior to the proposed date of issuance (or effectiveness) specified therein. Not later than 12:00 noon on the proposed date of issuance (or effectiveness) specified in such Request for Issuance, and upon fulfillment of the applicable conditions precedent and the other requirements set forth herein, the relevant LC Issuing Bank shall issue (or extend, amend or modify) such Letter of Credit and provide notice and a copy thereof to the Administrative Agent, which shall, upon request by a Lender, promptly furnish copies thereof to such Lender; provided that the LC Issuing Bank shall not issue or amend any Letter of Credit if such LC Issuing Bank has received notice from the Administrative Agent that the applicable conditions precedent have not been satisfied.

(c)    No Letter of Credit shall be requested or issued hereunder if, after the issuance thereof, (i) the Outstanding Credits would exceed the aggregate Commitments, or (ii) the LC Outstandings would exceed $600,000,000.

(d)    The Borrower hereby agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each LC Issuing Bank and, if they shall have purchased participations in the reimbursement obligations of the Borrower pursuant to subsection (e) below, the participating Lenders, on each date on which such LC Issuing Bank shall pay any amount under any Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank, a sum equal to the amount so paid plus interest on such amount from the date so paid by such LC Issuing Bank until repayment to such LC Issuing Bank in full at a fluctuating interest rate per annum equal to the interest rate applicable to Base Rate Advances plus 2%. The Borrower may reimburse drawings under a Letter of Credit with an Advance. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the obligations with respect to Letters of Credit of (i) the Borrower shall survive any Termination Date and shall remain in effect until no Letters of Credit remain outstanding, (ii) each Lender shall survive to the extent that the Borrower shall fail to deposit cash collateral in the LC Collateral Account as required under subsection (b) above and (iii) each Lender shall be reinstated, to the extent any such cash collateral, the application thereof or the reimbursement in respect thereof is required to be returned to the Borrower by any LC Issuing Bank after such Termination Date.

(e)    If any LC Issuing Bank shall not have been reimbursed in full for any payment made by such LC Issuing Bank under a Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank on the date of such payment, such LC Issuing Bank may give the Administrative Agent and each Lender prompt notice thereof (an “ LC Payment Notice ”) no later than 12:00 noon on any Business Day on or after the Business Day immediately succeeding the date of such payment by such LC Issuing Bank. Each Lender severally agrees to purchase a participation in the reimbursement obligation of the Borrower to such LC Issuing Bank by paying to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank an amount equal to such Lender’s Commitment Percentage of such unreimbursed amount paid by such LC Issuing Bank, plus


25

interest on such amount at a rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate from the date of the payment by such LC Issuing Bank to the date of payment to such LC Issuing Bank by such Lender. Each such payment by a Lender shall be made not later than 3:00 P.M. on the later to occur of (i) the Business Day immediately following the date of such payment by such LC Issuing Bank and (ii) the Business Day on which such Lender shall have received an LC Payment Notice from such LC Issuing Bank. Each Lender’s obligation to make each such payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank shall be several and shall not be affected by the occurrence or continuance of a Default or the failure of any other Lender to make any payment under this Section 2.04(e). Each Lender further agrees that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever.

(f) The failure of any Lender to make any payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of any LC Issuing Bank in accordance with subsection (e) above shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation to make payment, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender. If any Lender (a “ non-performing Lender ”) shall fail to make any payment to the Administrative Agent for the account of any LC Issuing Bank in accordance with subsection (e) above within five Business Days after the LC Payment Notice relating thereto, then, for so long as such failure shall continue, such LC Issuing Bank shall be deemed, for purposes of Sections 6.01 and 8.01 hereof, to be a Lender owed a Borrowing in an amount equal to the outstanding principal amount due and payable by such non-performing Lender to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank pursuant to subsection (e) above. Any non-performing Lender and the Borrower (without waiving any claim against such Lender for such Lender’s failure to purchase a participation in the reimbursement obligations of the Borrower under subsection (e) above) severally agree to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of such LC Issuing Bank forthwith on demand such amount, together with interest thereon for each day from the date such Lender would have purchased its participation had it complied with the requirements of subsection (e) above until the date such amount is paid to the Administrative Agent at (i) in the case of the Borrower, the interest rate applicable at the time to Base Rate Advances plus 2%, in accordance with Section 2.04(d), and (ii) in the case of such Lender, the Federal Funds Rate.

(g) The payment obligations of each Lender under Section 2.04(e) and of the Borrower under this Agreement in respect of any payment under any Letter of Credit shall be unconditional and irrevocable, and shall be paid strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement under all circumstances, including, without limitation, the following circumstances:

(i) any lack of validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any other agreement or instrument relating thereto or to such Letter of Credit;

(ii) any amendment or waiver of, or any consent to departure from, the terms of this Agreement or such Letter of Credit;

(iii) the existence of any claim, set-off, defense or other right that the Borrower may have at any time against any beneficiary, or any transferee, of such Letter of Credit (or any Persons for whom any such beneficiary or any such transferee may be acting), any LC Issuing Bank, or any other Person, whether in connection with this Agreement,


26

the transactions contemplated hereby, thereby or by such Letter of Credit, or any unrelated transaction;

(iv) any statement or any other document presented under such Letter of Credit proving to be forged, fraudulent, invalid or insufficient in any respect or any statement therein being untrue or inaccurate in any respect;

(v) payment in good faith by any LC Issuing Bank under the Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank against presentation of a draft or certificate that does not comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit;

(vi) the use that may be made of any Letter of Credit by, or any act or omission of, the beneficiary of any Letter of Credit (or any Person for which the beneficiary may be acting); or
 
(vii) any other circumstance or happening whatsoever, whether or not similar to any of the foregoing.

(h) Without limiting any other provision of this Section 2.04, for purposes of this Section 2.04 any LC Issuing Bank may rely upon any oral, telephonic, telegraphic, facsimile, electronic, written or other communication believed in good faith to have been authorized by the Borrower, whether or not given or signed by an authorized Person of the Borrower.

(i) The Borrower assumes all risks of the acts and omissions of any beneficiary or transferee of any Letter of Credit. Neither any LC Issuing Bank, the Lenders nor any of their respective officers, directors, employees, agents or Affiliates shall be liable or responsible for (i) the use that may be made of such Letter of Credit or any acts or omissions of any beneficiary or transferee thereof in connection therewith; (ii) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents, or of any endorsement thereon, even if such documents should prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; (iii) payment by any LC Issuing Bank against presentation of documents that do not comply with the terms of such Letter of Credit, including failure of any documents to bear any reference or adequate reference to such Letter of Credit; or (iv) any other circumstances whatsoever in making or failing to make payment under such Letter of Credit, except that the Borrower and each Lender shall have the right to bring suit against each LC Issuing Bank, and each LC Issuing Bank shall be liable to the Borrower and any Lender, to the extent of any direct, as opposed to consequential, damages suffered by the Borrower or such Lender that the Borrower or such Lender proves were caused by such LC Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence, including, in the case of the Borrower, such LC Issuing Bank’s willful failure to make timely payment under such Letter of Credit following the presentation to it by the beneficiary thereof of a draft and accompanying certificate(s) that strictly comply with the terms and conditions of such Letter of Credit. In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each LC Issuing Bank may accept sight drafts and accompanying certificates presented under the Letter of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank that appear on their face to be in order, without responsibility for further investigation, regardless of any notice or information to the contrary, and payment against such documents shall not constitute willful misconduct or gross negligence by such LC Issuing Bank.


27

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Lender shall be obligated to indemnify the Borrower for damages caused by any LC Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence.

(j) Upon satisfaction of all conditions precedent set forth in Sections 3.01 and 3.02, all Letters of Credit listed in Schedule 2.04(j) shall be deemed to be “Letters of Credit” issued pursuant to this Section 2.04 on the date of this Agreement for all purposes of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents.

SECTION 2.05. Fees.
  
(a)    The Borrower agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender a commitment fee equal to the Commitment Fee Rate in effect from time to time, multiplied by the amount of such Lender’s Available Commitment (i) from the date hereof, in the case of each Initial Lender, and (ii) from the effective date specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, in the case of each other Lender, in each case until the Termination Date of such Lender, payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September and December, commencing December 31, 2014, and ending on the Termination Date of such Lender.

(b)    The Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent such fees as may from time to time be agreed between the Borrower and the Administrative Agent.
  
(c)    The Borrower shall pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender a fee (the “ LC Fee ”) on the average daily aggregate principal amount of each such Lender’s Commitment Percentage of the LC Outstandings (i) from the date hereof, in the case of each Initial Lender, and (ii) from the effective date specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender, in the case of each other Lender, in each case until the later to occur of (x) the Termination Date of such Lender, and (y) the date on which no Letters of Credit in which such Lender is obligated to participate are outstanding, payable on the last day of each March, June, September and December (commencing on December 31, 2014), and on such later date, at a rate equal at all times to the Applicable Margin in effect from time to time for Eurodollar Rate Advances.

(d)    The Borrower shall pay to each LC Issuing Bank fronting and other fees for the issuance and maintenance of Letters of Credit issued by such LC Issuing Bank and for drawings thereunder as may be separately agreed between the Borrower and such LC Issuing Bank.

SECTION 2.06. Extension of the Termination Date.
  
(a)    Not earlier than 60 days prior to, nor later than 30 days prior to each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of this Agreement, the Borrower may request by notice made to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly notify the Lenders thereof) a one-year extension of the Termination Date. Each Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent by the date specified by the Administrative Agent (which date shall be a Business Day and shall not be less than 15 days prior to, nor more than 30 days prior to, the Extension Effective Date) that either (A) such Lender declines to consent to extending the Termination Date or (B) such Lender consents to extending the Termination Date. Any Lender not responding within the above time period shall be deemed not to have consented to extending the Termination Date. The


28

Administrative Agent shall, after receiving the notifications from all of the Lenders or the expiration of such period, whichever is earlier, notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the results thereof. The Borrower may request no more than two extensions pursuant to this Section.

(b)    If any Lender declines, or is deemed to have declined, to consent to such request for extension (each a “ Declining Lender ”), the Borrower shall have the right to replace such Declining Lender in accordance with Section 2.20(b). Any Lender replacing a Declining Lender shall be deemed to have consented to such request for extension (regardless of when such replacement is effective) and shall not be deemed to be a Declining Lender.
  
(c)    If the Required Lenders have consented to the extension of the Termination Date, the Termination Date shall be extended (solely with respect each Lender that consented to the extension) to the date that is one year after the then-effective Termination Date, effective as of the date to be determined by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower (the “ Extension Effective Date ”). On or prior to the Extension Effective Date, the Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent, in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, (i) the resolutions of the Borrower authorizing such extension, certified as being in effect as of the Extension Effective Date and the related incumbency certificate of the Borrower, (ii) a favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), as to such matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request and (iii) a certificate of the Borrower stating that on and as of such Extension Effective Date, and after giving effect to the extension to be effective on such date, all conditions precedent to an Extension of Credit are satisfied. On each Extension Effective Date, the Declining Lender shall have received payment in full of the principal amount of all Advances outstanding owing to such Declining Lender and all interest thereon and all fees and other amounts (including, without limitation, any amounts payable pursuant to Section 8.04(c)) payable to such Declining Lender accrued through such Extension Effective Date. Promptly following such Extension Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall distribute an amended Schedule I to this Agreement (which shall thereafter be incorporated into this Agreement) to reflect any changes in the Lenders, the Commitments and each Lender’s Commitment Percentage as of such Extension Effective Date.

(d)    Each LC Issuing Bank may, in its sole discretion, elect not to serve in such capacity following any extension of the Termination Date; provided that, (i) the Borrower and the Administrative Agent may appoint a replacement for such resigning LC Issuing Bank, and (ii) whether such replacement is found shall not otherwise affect the extension of the Termination Date.

SECTION 2.07. Increase of the Commitments.
  
(a)    The Borrower may, from time to time, provided that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, request by notice to the Administrative Agent, to increase the Commitments in minimum increments of $10,000,000, up to a maximum increase aggregate amount (for all such increases) of $500,000,000, by designating one or more Eligible Assignees (each a “ Designated Lender ”) that agree to accept all or a portion of such additional Commitments (the “ Proposed Increased Commitment ”), provided , that (i) if a Designated Lender is not a Lender, such Designated Lender shall be reasonably acceptable to the


29

Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank, and such Designated Lender’s Proposed Increased Commitment shall be at least $5,000,000; and (ii) if Designated Lender is a Lender, such Designated Lender shall be reasonably acceptable to each LC Issuing Bank, and allocations of the Proposed Increased Commitment among Designated Lenders that are Lenders shall be based on the ratio of each existing Lender’s Proposed Increased Commitment, if any, to the aggregate of all Proposed Increased Commitments. The Borrower may elect to remove or replace any such designated Eligible Assignee at any time prior to the effective date of such increase, provided that any newly designated Eligible Assignee is reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank.
  
(b)    The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Designated Lenders of the Proposed Increased Commitment. Each Designated Lender shall notify the Administrative Agent by the date specified by the Administrative Agent (which date shall be a Business Day) that either (A) such Designated Lender declines to accept its additional Commitments or (B) such Designated Lender consents to accept its additional Commitments. Any Designated Lender not responding on or prior to the date specified by the Administrative Agent shall be deemed not to have consented to accept its additional Commitments. The Administrative Agent shall, after receiving the notifications from all of the Designated Lenders or following the date specified in the notice to such Designated Lenders, whichever is earlier, notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the results thereof and the effective date of any additional Commitments. The Borrower shall deliver (i) a certificate signed by a duly authorized officer of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, dated as of the effective date of such additional Commitments, stating that all conditions precedent to an Extension of Credit set forth in Section 3.02 are true and correct on and as of such effective date and (ii) a favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), as to such matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.
 
(c)    Promptly following the effective date of any Commitment increase pursuant to this Section 2.07, (i) the Administrative Agent shall distribute an amended Schedule I to this Agreement (which shall thereafter be incorporated into this Agreement) to reflect any changes in Lenders, the Commitments and each Lender’s Commitment Percentage as of such effective date and (ii) the Borrower shall prepay the outstanding Borrowings (if any) in full, and shall simultaneously make new Borrowings hereunder in an amount equal to such prepayment, so that, after giving effect thereto, the Borrowings are held ratably by the Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitments (after giving effect to such Commitment increase). Prepayments made under this clause (c) shall not be subject to the notice requirements of Section 2.14.

(d)    Notwithstanding any provision contained herein to the contrary, from and after the date of any Commitment increase and the making of any Advances on such date pursuant to clause (c)(ii) above, all calculations and payments of fees and of interest on the Advances shall take into account the actual Commitment of each Lender and the principal amount outstanding of each Advance made by such Lender during the relevant period of time.

SECTION 2.08. Termination or Reduction of the Commitments.
  
(a)    The Borrower shall have the right, upon at least three Business Days’ notice to the Administrative Agent, to terminate in whole or reduce ratably in part the Available


30

Commitments, provided that (i) each partial reduction shall be in a minimum amount of $5,000,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and (ii) no such termination or reduction shall be made that would reduce the aggregate Commitments to an amount less than the Outstanding Credits on the date of such termination or reduction.

(b)    The Borrower may terminate the Available Commitment of any Lender that is a Defaulting Lender in accordance with Section 8.16(a)(vi).

(c)    The Commitment of each Lender shall automatically terminate on the Termination Date applicable to such Lender as provided in Section 2.06.
  
(d)    Once terminated, neither a Commitment nor any portion thereof may be reinstated.

SECTION 2.09. Repayment of Advances.
  
(a)    The Borrower shall repay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each Lender on the Termination Date with respect to such Lender the aggregate principal amount of all Advances made by such Lender to the Borrower then outstanding.
  
(b)    If at any time (i) the aggregate principal amount of Outstanding Credits exceed the aggregate Commitments, the Borrower shall pay or prepay so much of the Borrowings and/or deposit funds in the LC Collateral Account equal to 103% of so much of the LC Outstandings as shall be necessary in order that the principal amount of Advances outstanding plus the aggregate amount of LC Outstandings not so cash collateralized will not exceed the Commitments.

SECTION 2.10. Evidence of Indebtedness.
  
(a)    Each Lender shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness to such Lender resulting from each Advance made by such Lender from time to time, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Lender from time to time under this Agreement.
  
(b)    The Administrative Agent shall maintain accounts in which it will record (i) the amount of each Advance made hereunder, the Type of each Advance made and the Interest Period applicable thereto, (ii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from the Borrower to each Lender hereunder and (iii) the amount of any sum received by the Administrative Agent hereunder from the Borrower and each Lender’s share thereof.
  
(c)    The entries made in the accounts maintained pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this Section 2.10 shall, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the obligations therein recorded; provided , however , that the failure of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to maintain such accounts or any error therein shall not in any manner affect the obligations of the Borrower to repay the Advances and interest thereon in accordance with their terms.


31

(d)    Any Lender may request that any Advances made by it be evidenced by one or more promissory notes. In such event, the Borrower shall prepare, execute and deliver to such Lender one or more promissory notes payable to such Lender (or, if requested by such Lender, to such Lender and its assignees) and in a form approved by the Administrative Agent. Thereafter, the Advances evidenced by such promissory notes and interest thereon shall at all times (including after assignment pursuant to Section 8.07) be represented by one or more promissory notes in such form payable to the payee named therein.
  
SECTION 2.11. Interest on Advances.
  
The Borrower shall pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Advance from the date of such Advance until such principal amount shall be paid in full, at the following rates per annum:
(a) Base Rate Advances . During such periods as such Advance is a Base Rate Advance, a rate per annum equal at all times to the sum of (x) the Base Rate plus (y) the Applicable Margin for Base Rate Advances in effect from time to time, payable in arrears quarterly on the last day of each March, June, September and December during such periods and on the date such Base Rate Advance shall be Converted or paid in full.
  
(b) Eurodollar Rate Advances . During such periods as such Advance is a Eurodollar Rate Advance, a rate per annum equal at all times during each Interest Period for such Advance to the sum of (x) the Eurodollar Rate for such Interest Period for such Advance plus (y) the Applicable Margin for Eurodollar Rate Advances in effect from time to time, payable in arrears on the last day of such Interest Period and, if such Interest Period has a duration of more than three months, on each day that occurs during such Interest Period every three months from the first day of such Interest Period and on the date such Eurodollar Rate Advance shall be Converted or paid in full.
  
(c) Additional Interest on Eurodollar Rate Advances . The Borrower shall pay to each Lender, so long as such Lender shall be required under regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to maintain reserves with respect to liabilities or assets consisting of or including Eurocurrency Liabilities, additional interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Lender, from the date of such Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at an interest rate per annum equal at all times to the remainder obtained by subtracting (i) the Eurodollar Rate for the Interest Period for such Advance from (ii) the rate obtained by dividing such Eurodollar Rate by a percentage equal to 100% minus the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage of such Lender for such Interest Period, payable on each date on which interest is payable on such Advance. Such additional interest shall be determined by such Lender and notified to the Borrower through the Administrative Agent.


32

SECTION 2.12. Interest Rate Determination.
  
(a)    The Administrative Agent shall give prompt notice to the Borrower and the Lenders of the applicable interest rate determined by the Administrative Agent for purposes of Section 2.11(a) or (b), and, if applicable, the rate for the purpose of determining the applicable interest rate under Section 2.11(c).

(b)    If, with respect to any Eurodollar Rate Advances, (i) the Required Lenders notify the Administrative Agent that the Eurodollar Rate for any Interest Period for such Advances will not adequately reflect the cost to such Required Lenders of making, funding or maintaining their respective Eurodollar Rate Advances for such Interest Period, or (ii) the Administrative Agent determines that adequate and fair means do not exist for ascertaining the applicable interest rate on the basis provided for in the definition of Eurodollar Rate, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith so notify the Borrower and the Lenders, whereupon (A) each Eurodollar Rate Advance will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into a Base Rate Advance, and (B) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended until the Administrative Agent shall notify the Borrower and the Lenders that the circumstances causing such suspension no longer exist.
  
(c)    If the Borrower shall fail to select the duration of any Interest Period for any Eurodollar Rate Advances in accordance with the provisions contained in the definition of “Interest Period” in Section 1.01, the Administrative Agent will forthwith so notify the Borrower and the Lenders and such Advances will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into Base Rate Advances.
  
(d)    On the date on which the aggregate unpaid principal amount of Eurodollar Rate Advances comprising any Borrowing shall be reduced, by payment or prepayment or otherwise, to less than $10,000,000, such Advances shall automatically Convert into Base Rate Advances.
  
(e)    Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default, (i) each Eurodollar Rate Advance will automatically, on the last day of the then existing Interest Period therefor, Convert into a Base Rate Advance and (ii) the obligation of the Lenders to make, or to Convert Advances into, Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be suspended.
  
SECTION 2.13. Optional Conversion of Advances.
  
The Borrower may on any Business Day, upon notice given to the Administrative Agent not later than 12:00 noon on the third Business Day prior to the date of the proposed Conversion and subject to the provisions of Sections 2.12 and 2.16, Convert all or any part of Advances of one Type comprising the same Borrowing into Advances of the other Type or of the same Type but having a new Interest Period; provided , however , that any Conversion of Eurodollar Rate Advances into Base Rate Advances shall be made only on the last day of an Interest Period for such Eurodollar Rate Advances, any Conversion of Base Rate Advances into Eurodollar Rate Advances shall be in an amount not less than the minimum amount specified in Section 2.02(b) and no Conversion of any Advances shall result in more separate Borrowings than permitted under Section 2.02(b). Each such notice of a Conversion shall, within the restrictions specified above, specify (i) the date of such Conversion, (ii) the Advances to be Converted, and (iii) if


33

such Conversion is into Eurodollar Rate Advances, the duration of the initial Interest Period for each such Advance. Each notice of Conversion shall be irrevocable and binding on the Borrower.
SECTION 2.14. Optional Prepayments of Advances.
  
The Borrower may, upon at least two Business Days’ notice, in the case of Eurodollar Rate Advances, and upon notice not later than 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on the date of prepayment, in the case of Base Rate Advances, to the Administrative Agent stating the proposed date and aggregate principal amount of the prepayment, and, if such notice is given, the Borrower shall prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Advances comprising part of the same Borrowing in whole or ratably in part, together with accrued interest to the date of such prepayment on the principal amount prepaid; provided , however , that (x) each partial prepayment shall be in a minimum amount of $5,000,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof and (y) in the event of any such prepayment of a Eurodollar Rate Advance, the Borrower shall be obligated to reimburse the Lenders in respect thereof pursuant to Section 8.04(c).
SECTION 2.15. Increased Costs.
  
(a)     Increased Costs Generally . If any Change in Law shall:
 
(i) impose, modify or deem applicable any reserve, special deposit, compulsory loan, insurance charge or similar requirement against assets of, deposits with or for the account of, or credit extended or participated in by, any Lender (except any reserve requirement reflected in the Eurodollar Rate Reserve Percentage, in the case of Eurodollar Rate Advances) or any LC Issuing Bank;
 
(ii) subject any Recipient to any Taxes (other than (A) Indemnified Taxes, (B) Taxes described in clauses (b) through (d) of the definition of Excluded Taxes and (C) Connection Income Taxes) on its loans, loan principal, letters of credit, commitments, or other obligations, or its deposits, reserves, other liabilities or capital attributable thereto; or

(iii) impose on any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank or the London interbank market any other condition, cost or expense (other than Taxes) affecting this Agreement or Advances made by such Lender or any Letter of Credit or participation therein;

and the result of any of the foregoing shall be to increase the cost to such Lender or such other Recipient of making, converting to, continuing or maintaining any Advance or of maintaining its obligation to make any such Advance, or to increase the cost to such Lender, such LC Issuing Bank or such other Recipient of participating in, issuing or maintaining any Letter of Credit (or of maintaining its obligation to participate in or to issue any Letter of Credit), or to reduce the amount of any sum received or receivable by such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient hereunder (whether of principal, interest or any other amount) then, upon request of such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient, the Borrower will pay to such Lender, LC Issuing Bank or other Recipient, as the case may be, such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or other Recipient, as the case may be, for such additional costs incurred or reduction suffered.



34

(b)     Capital Requirements . If any Lender or LC Issuing Bank determines that any Change in Law affecting such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or any Applicable Lending Office of such Lender or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, regarding capital or liquidity requirements, has or would have the effect of reducing the rate of return on such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s capital or on the capital of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company, if any, as a consequence of this Agreement, the Commitments of such Lender or the Advances made by such Lender, or participations in Letters of Credit held by, such Lender, or the Letters of Credit issued by any LC Issuing Bank, to a level below that which such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company could have achieved but for such Change in Law (taking into consideration such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s policies and the policies of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company with respect to capital adequacy and liquidity), then from time to time the Borrower will pay to such Lender or LC Issuing Bank such additional amount or amounts as will compensate such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s holding company for any such reduction suffered.
 
(c)     Certificates for Reimbursement . A certificate of a Lender or LC Issuing Bank setting forth the amount or amounts necessary to compensate such Lender or LC Issuing Bank or its holding company, as the case may be, as specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this Section and delivered to the Borrower, shall be conclusive absent manifest error. The Borrower shall pay such Lender or LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, the amount shown as due on any such certificate within ten days after receipt thereof.

(d)     Delay in Requests . Failure or delay on the part of any Lender or LC Issuing Bank to demand compensation pursuant to this Section shall not constitute a waiver of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s right to demand such compensation; provided that the Borrower shall not be required to compensate a Lender or LC Issuing Bank pursuant to this Section for any increased costs incurred or reductions suffered more than six months prior to the date that such Lender or LC Issuing Bank notifies the Borrower of the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions, and of such Lender’s or LC Issuing Bank’s intention to claim compensation therefor (except that, if the Change in Law giving rise to such increased costs or reductions is retroactive, then the six-month period referred to above shall be extended to include the period of retroactive effect thereof).

SECTION 2.16. Illegality.
  
If due to any Change in Law it shall become unlawful or impossible for any Credit Party (or its Eurodollar Lending Office) to make, maintain or fund its Eurodollar Rate Advances, and such Credit Party shall so notify the Administrative Agent, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith give notice thereof to the other Credit Parties and the Borrower, whereupon, until such Credit Party notifies the Borrower and the Administrative Agent that the circumstances giving rise to such suspension no longer exist, the obligation of such Credit Party to make Eurodollar Rate Advances, or to Convert outstanding Advances into Eurodollar Rate Advances, shall be suspended. Before giving any notice to the Administrative Agent pursuant to this Section 2.16, such Credit Party shall use reasonable efforts (consistent with its internal policy and legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to such Credit Party) to designate a different Eurodollar


35

Lending Office if such designation would avoid the need for giving such notice and would not, in the judgment of such Credit Party, be otherwise disadvantageous to such Credit Party. If such notice is given, each Eurodollar Rate Advance of such Credit Party then outstanding shall be converted to a Base Rate Advance either (i) on the last day of the then current Interest Period applicable to such Eurodollar Rate Advance if such Credit Party may lawfully continue to maintain and fund such Advance to such day or (ii) immediately if such Credit Party shall determine that it may not lawfully continue to maintain and fund such Advance to such day.
SECTION 2.17. Payments and Computations.
  
(a)    The Borrower shall make each payment to be made by it hereunder not later than 1:00 P.M. on the day when due in Dollars to the Administrative Agent at the Agent’s Account in same day funds without condition or deduction for any counterclaim, defense, recoupment or setoff. The Administrative Agent will promptly thereafter cause to be distributed like funds relating to the payment of principal or interest or commitment fees ratably (other than amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.11(c), 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(c) or 8.16) to the Lenders for the account of their respective Applicable Lending Offices, and like funds relating to the payment of any other amount payable to any Lender to such Lender for the account of its Applicable Lending Office, in each case to be applied in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon its acceptance of an Assignment and Assumption and recording of the information contained therein in the Register pursuant to Section 8.07(c), from and after the effective date specified in such Assignment and Assumption, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments hereunder in respect of the interest assigned thereby to the Lender assignee thereunder, and the parties to such Assignment and Assumption shall make all appropriate adjustments in such payments for periods prior to such effective date directly between themselves.
  
(b)    The Borrower hereby authorizes each Lender, if and to the extent payment owed to such Lender is not made when due hereunder, after any applicable grace period, to charge from time to time against any or all of the Borrower’s accounts with such Lender any amount so due.
  
(c)    All computations of interest based on the rate referred to in clause (i) of the definition of the “Base Rate” contained in Section 1.01 shall be made by the Administrative Agent on the basis of a year of 365 or 366 days, as the case may be, and all computations of interest based on the Eurodollar Rate or the Federal Funds Rate and of commitment fees and LC Fees shall be made by the Administrative Agent on the basis of a year of 360 days, in each case for the actual number of days (including the first day but excluding the last day) occurring in the period for which such interest, commitment fees or LC Fees are payable. Each determination by the Administrative Agent of an interest rate hereunder shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes, absent manifest error.
  
(d)    Whenever any payment hereunder shall be stated to be due on a day other than a Business Day, such payment shall be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and such extension of time shall in such case be included in the computation of payment of interest or commitment fees, as the case may be; provided, however, that, if such extension would cause payment of interest on or principal of Eurodollar Rate Advances to be made in the next following


36

calendar month or on a date after the Termination Date, such payment shall be made on the next preceding Business Day.
  
(e)    Unless the Administrative Agent shall have received notice from the Borrower prior to the date on which any payment is due to a Lender hereunder that the Borrower will not make such payment in full, the Administrative Agent may assume that the Borrower has made such payment in full to the Administrative Agent on such date, and the Administrative Agent may, in reliance upon such assumption, cause to be distributed to each Lender on such due date an amount equal to the amount then due such Lender. If and to the extent that the Borrower shall not have so made such payment in full to the Administrative Agent, each Lender shall repay to the Administrative Agent forthwith on demand such amount distributed to such Lender together with interest thereon, for each day from the date such amount is distributed to such Lender until the date such Lender repays such amount to the Administrative Agent, at the Federal Funds Rate.
 
SECTION 2.18. Taxes.

(a)     Defined Terms . For purposes of this Section 2.18, the term “Lender” includes any LC Issuing Bank and the term “Applicable Law” includes FATCA.

(b)     Payments Free of Taxes . Any and all payments by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower under any Loan Document shall be made without deduction or withholding for any Taxes, except as required by Applicable Law. If any Applicable Law (as determined in the good faith discretion of an applicable Withholding Agent) requires the deduction or withholding of any Tax from any such payment by a Withholding Agent, then the applicable Withholding Agent shall be entitled to make such deduction or withholding and shall timely pay the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with Applicable Law and, if such Tax is an Indemnified Tax, then the sum payable by the Borrower shall be increased as necessary so that after such deduction or withholding has been made (including such deductions and withholdings applicable to additional sums payable under this Section) the applicable Recipient receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deduction or withholding been made.

(c)     Payment of Other Taxes by the Borrower . The Borrower shall timely pay to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with Applicable Law, or at the option of the Administrative Agent timely reimburse it for the payment of, any Other Taxes.

(d)     Indemnification by the Borrower . The Borrower shall indemnify each Recipient, within 10 days after demand therefor, for the full amount of any Indemnified Taxes (including Indemnified Taxes imposed or asserted on or attributable to amounts payable under this Section) payable or paid by such Recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to such Recipient and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Indemnified Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to the Borrower by a Lender (with a copy to the Administrative Agent), or by the Administrative Agent on its own behalf or on behalf of a Lender, shall be conclusive absent manifest error.



37

(e)     Indemnification by the Lenders . Each Lender shall severally indemnify the Administrative Agent, within 10 days after demand therefor, for (i) any Indemnified Taxes attributable to such Lender (but only to the extent that the Borrower has not already indemnified the Administrative Agent for such Indemnified Taxes and without limiting the obligation of the Borrower to do so), (ii) any Taxes attributable to such Lender’s failure to comply with the provisions of Section 8.07(d) relating to the maintenance of a Participant Register and (iii) any Excluded Taxes attributable to such Lender, in each case, that are payable or paid by the Administrative Agent in connection with any Loan Document, and any reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Taxes were correctly or legally imposed or asserted by the relevant Governmental Authority. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to any Lender by the Administrative Agent shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Each Lender hereby authorizes the Administrative Agent to set off and apply any and all amounts at any time owing to such Lender under any Loan Document or otherwise payable by the Administrative Agent to the Lender from any other source against any amount due to the Administrative Agent under this subsection (e).

(f)     Evidence of Payments . As soon as practicable after any payment of Taxes by the Borrower to a Governmental Authority pursuant to this Section 2.18, the Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent the original or a certified copy of a receipt issued by such Governmental Authority evidencing such payment, a copy of the return reporting such payment or other evidence of such payment reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent.

(g)     Status of Lenders . (i) Any Lender that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of withholding Tax with respect to payments made under any Loan Document shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, at the time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, such properly completed and executed documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate of withholding. In addition, any Lender, if reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall deliver such other documentation prescribed by Applicable Law or reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Lender is subject to backup withholding or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion, execution and submission of such documentation (other than such documentation set forth in Section 2.18(g)(ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (ii)(D) below) shall not be required if in the Lender’s reasonable judgment such completion, execution or submission would subject such Lender to any material unreimbursed cost or expense or would materially prejudice the legal or commercial position of such Lender.

(ii)    Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
(A)    any Lender that is a U.S. Person shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent on or prior to the date on which such Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed copies of IRS Form W-9 certifying that such Lender is exempt from U.S. federal backup withholding tax;



38

(B)    any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), whichever of the following is applicable:

(i)    in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of an income tax treaty to which the United States is a party (x) with respect to payments of interest under any Loan Document, executed copies of IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “interest” article of such tax treaty and (y) with respect to any other applicable payments under any Loan Document, IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E establishing an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. federal withholding Tax pursuant to the “business profits” or “other income” article of such tax treaty;

(ii)    executed copies of IRS Form W-8ECI;

(iii)    in the case of a Foreign Lender claiming the benefits of the exemption for portfolio interest under Section 881(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, (x) a certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-1 to the effect that such Foreign Lender is not a “bank” within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, a “10 percent shareholder” of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a “controlled foreign corporation” described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code (a “ U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate ”) and (y) executed copies of IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E;

(iv) to the extent a Foreign Lender is not the beneficial owner, executed copies of IRS Form W-8IMY, accompanied by IRS Form W-8ECI, IRS Form W-8BEN, W‑8BEN‑E, a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-2 or Exhibit F-3, IRS Form W-9, and/or other certification documents from each beneficial owner, as applicable; provided that, if the Foreign Lender is a partnership and one or more direct or indirect partners of such Foreign Lender are claiming the portfolio interest exemption, such Foreign Lender may provide a U.S. Tax Compliance Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit F-4 on behalf of each such direct and indirect partner;

(C)    any Foreign Lender shall, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent (in such number of copies as shall be requested by the recipient) on or prior to the date on which such Foreign Lender becomes a Lender under this Agreement (and from time to time thereafter upon the reasonable request of the Borrower or the Administrative Agent), executed copies of any other form prescribed by Applicable Law as a basis for claiming exemption from or a reduction in U.S. federal withholding Tax, duly completed, together with such supplementary documentation as may be prescribed by Applicable Law to permit the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine the withholding or deduction required to be made; and

(D)    if a payment made to a Lender under any Loan Document would be subject to U.S. federal withholding Tax imposed by FATCA if such Lender were to fail to


39

comply with the applicable reporting requirements of FATCA (including those contained in Section 1471(b) or 1472(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable), such Lender shall deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent at the time or times prescribed by law and at such time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent such documentation prescribed by Applicable Law (including as prescribed by Section 1471(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code) and such additional documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as may be necessary for the Borrower and the Administrative Agent to comply with their obligations under FATCA and to determine that such Lender has complied with such Lender’s obligations under FATCA or to determine the amount to deduct and withhold from such payment. Solely for purposes of this clause (D), “FATCA” shall include any amendments made to FATCA after the date of this Agreement.

Each Lender agrees that if any form or certification it previously delivered expires or becomes obsolete or inaccurate in any respect, it shall update such form or certification or promptly notify the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in writing of its legal inability to do so.

(h)     Treatment of Certain Refunds . If any party determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that it has received a refund of any Taxes as to which it has been indemnified pursuant to this Section 2.18 (including by the payment of additional amounts pursuant to this Section 2.18), it shall pay to the indemnifying party an amount equal to such refund (but only to the extent of indemnity payments made under this Section with respect to the Taxes giving rise to such refund), net of all out-of-pocket expenses (including Taxes) of such indemnified party and without interest (other than any interest paid by the relevant Governmental Authority with respect to such refund). Such indemnifying party, upon the request of such indemnified party, shall repay to such indemnified party the amount paid over pursuant to this subsection (h) (plus any penalties, interest or other charges imposed by the relevant Governmental Authority) in the event that such indemnified party is required to repay such refund to such Governmental Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this subsection (h), in no event will the indemnified party be required to pay any amount to an indemnifying party pursuant to this subsection (h) the payment of which would place the indemnified party in a less favorable net after-Tax position than the indemnified party would have been in if the Tax subject to indemnification and giving rise to such refund had not been deducted, withheld or otherwise imposed and the indemnification payments or additional amounts with respect to such Tax had never been paid. This subsection shall not be construed to require any indemnified party to make available its Tax returns (or any other information relating to its Taxes that it deems confidential) to the indemnifying party or any other Person.

(i)     FATCA Withholding . For purposes of determining withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA, from and after the Restatement Effective Date, the Borrower and the Administrative Agent shall treat (and the Lenders hereby authorize the Administrative Agent to treat) the obligations of the Borrower set forth in this Agreement as not qualifying as a “grandfathered obligation” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Sections 1.1471-2(b)(2)(i) and 1.1471-2T(b)(2)(i).

(j)     Survival . Each party’s obligations under this Section 2.18 shall survive the resignation or replacement of the Administrative Agent or any assignment of rights by, or the


40

replacement of, a Lender, the termination of the Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all obligations under any Loan Document.

SECTION 2.19. Sharing of Payments, Etc.
  
(a)    If any Lender shall obtain any payment (whether voluntary, involuntary, through the exercise of any right of set-off, or otherwise) on account of the Advances owing to it or participations in Letters of Credit (other than pursuant to Section 2.11(c), 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(c) or 8.16 or in respect of Eurodollar Rate Advances converted into Base Rate Advances pursuant to Section 2.16) by the Borrower in excess of its ratable share of payments on account of the Advances to the Borrower and participations in Letters of Credit obtained by all the Lenders, such Lender shall forthwith purchase from the other Lenders such participations in such Advances owing to them and participations in Letters of Credit as shall be necessary to cause such purchasing Lender to share the excess payment ratably with each of them; provided , however , that if all or any portion of such excess payment is thereafter recovered from such purchasing Lender, such purchase from each Lender shall be rescinded and such Lender shall repay to the purchasing Lender the purchase price to the extent of such recovery together with an amount equal to such Lender’s ratable share (according to the proportion of (i) the amount of such Lender’s required repayment to (ii) the total amount so recovered from the purchasing Lender) of any interest or other amount paid or payable by the purchasing Lender in respect of the total amount so recovered. The Borrower agrees that any Lender so purchasing a participation from another Lender pursuant to this Section 2.19 may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, exercise all its rights of payment (including the right of set-off) with respect to such participation as fully as if such Lender were the direct creditor of the Borrower in the amount of such participation.
  
(b)    If any Lender shall fail to make any payment required to be made by it pursuant to Sections 2.02(d), 2.03(c), 2.04(e) or 7.05, then the Administrative Agent may, in its discretion and notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof, (i) apply any amounts thereafter received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Lender for the benefit of the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks to satisfy such Lender’s obligations to it or them under such Section until all such unsatisfied obligations are fully paid, and/or (ii) hold any such amounts in a segregated account as cash collateral for, and application to, any future funding obligations of such Lender under any such Section, in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii) above, in any order as determined by the Administrative Agent in its discretion.
 
SECTION 2.20. Mitigation Obligations; Replacement of Lenders.

(a)     Designation of a Different Lending Office . If any Lender delivers a notice pursuant to Section 2.16, requests compensation under Section 2.15, or requires the Borrower to pay any Indemnified Taxes or additional amounts to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.18, then such Lender shall (at the request of the Borrower) use reasonable efforts to designate a different Applicable Lending Office or to assign its rights and obligations hereunder to another of its offices, branches or Affiliates, if, in the judgment of such Lender, such designation or assignment (i) would eliminate or reduce amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.15 or 2.18, as the case may be, in the future, and (ii) would not subject such Lender to any unreimbursed cost or expense and would not otherwise be


41

disadvantageous to such Lender. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by any Lender in connection with any such designation or assignment.

(b)     Replacement of Lenders . If any Lender delivers a notice pursuant to Section 2.16, requests compensation under Section 2.15, or requires the Borrower to pay any Indemnified Taxes or additional amounts to any Lender or any Governmental Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 2.18 and, in each case, such Lender has declined or is unable to designate a different Applicable Lending Office in accordance with Section 2.20(a), or if any Lender is a Declining Lender, a Defaulting Lender or a Non-Consenting Lender, then the Borrower may, at its sole expense and effort, upon notice to such Lender and the Administrative Agent, require such Lender to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the restrictions contained in, and consents required by, Section 8.07), all of its interests, rights (other than its existing rights to payments pursuant to Section 2.15 or 2.18) and obligations under this Agreement and the related Loan Documents to an Eligible Assignee that shall assume such obligations (which assignee may be another Lender, if such Lender accepts such assignment); provided that:

(i)    the Borrower shall have paid to the Administrative Agent the assignment fee (if any) specified in Section 8.07(b)(iv);

(ii)    such Lender shall have received payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal of its Advances and any participations in Letters of Credit funded pursuant to Section 2.04(e), together with all applicable accrued interest thereon, accrued fees and all other amounts payable to it hereunder and under the other Loan Documents (including any amounts under Section 8.04(c)) from the assignee (to the extent of such outstanding principal amounts and accrued interest and fees) or the Borrower (in the case of all other amounts);

(iii)    in the case of any such assignment resulting from a claim for compensation under Section 2.15 or payments required to be made pursuant to Section 2.18, such assignment will result in a reduction in such compensation or payments thereafter;
 
(iv)    no Default shall have occurred and be continuing;

(v) such assignment does not conflict with Applicable Law; and

(vi) in the case of any assignment resulting from a Lender becoming a Non-Consenting Lender, the applicable assignee shall have consented to the applicable amendment, waiver or consent.

A Lender shall not be required to make any such assignment or delegation if, prior thereto, as a result of a waiver by such Lender or otherwise, the circumstances entitling the Borrower to require such assignment and delegation cease to apply.


42

ARTICLE III
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

SECTION 3.01. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement and Initial Extensions of Credit.
  
This Agreement and the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank, as applicable, to make the initial Extension of Credit to be made by it hereunder shall take effect on the date (the “Restatement Effective Date”) on which each of the following conditions precedent has been satisfied:
(a)    The Administrative Agent shall have received on or before the Restatement Effective Date the following, each dated such day, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent in sufficient copies for each Lender:

(i)    Certified copies of the resolutions of the board of directors of the Borrower approving this Agreement, and of all documents evidencing other necessary corporate action and Governmental Approvals, if any, with respect to this Agreement.
  
(ii)    A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Borrower certifying the names and true signatures of the officers of the Borrower authorized to sign this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered by the Borrower hereunder.
  
(iii)    A favorable opinion of counsel for the Borrower (which may be an attorney of American Electric Power Service Corporation), substantially in the form of Exhibit D hereto and as to such other matters as any Lender through the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.
  
(iv)    A favorable opinion of King & Spalding LLP, counsel for the Administrative Agent, in the form of Exhibit E hereto.
   
(b)    On the Restatement Effective Date, the following statements shall be true and the Administrative Agent shall have received for the account of each Lender a certificate signed by a duly authorized officer of the Borrower, dated such date, stating that:

(i)    The representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in Section 4.01 are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the Restatement Effective Date, as though made on and as of such date, and

(ii)    No event has occurred and is continuing that constitutes a Default.
 
(c)    The Borrower shall have paid all fees and expenses of the Administrative Agent, the Joint Lead Arrangers and the Lenders then due and payable in accordance with the terms of the Loan Documents (including the fees and expenses of counsel to the Administrative Agent to the extent then due and payable).
  
(d)    The Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts of this Agreement, executed and delivered by the Borrower and the Lenders.


43

(e)    The Administrative Agent shall have received all promissory notes (if any) requested by the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.10(d), duly completed and executed by the Borrower and payable to such Lenders.

(f)    The Administrative Agent shall have received copies of the Disclosure Documents.

(g)    The Administrative Agent shall have received all documentation and information required by regulatory authorities under applicable “know your customer” and anti-money laundering rules and regulations, including, without limitation, the Patriot Act, to the extent such documentation or information is requested by the Administrative Agent on behalf of the Lenders prior to the Restatement Effective Date.

(h)    The Administrative Agent shall have received a copy of an agreement among the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and each Departing Lender evidencing the termination of the “Commitment” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of such Departing Lender, and such Departing Lender shall have received payment in full of all “Advances” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of such Departing Lender outstanding as of the Restatement Effective Date, together with all interest accrued and unpaid thereon, any amounts owing in respect of such payment pursuant to Section 8.04(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, all accrued and unpaid commitment fees and LC Fees pursuant to Sections 2.05(a) and 2.05(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, and any other amounts then due and owing by the Borrower to such Departing Lender pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date.

(i)    The Swingline Bank (as such term is defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) shall have received payment in full from the Borrower of all “Swingline Outstandings” (as such term is defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) as of the Restatement Effective Date.

(j)    The LC Outstandings of each of JPMorgan Chase, RBS, Citibank, and KeyBank shall not exceed $75,000,000 for each such LC Issuing Bank as of the Restatement Effective Date.

(k) The Borrower shall have paid to the Lenders all accrued and unpaid commitment fees and LC Fees pursuant to Sections 2.05(a) and 2.05(c) of the Existing Credit Agreement, and any other amounts then due and owing by Borrower to the Lenders pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement (other than the Advances and related interest amounts that, pursuant to Section 8.18, are being reallocated and/or continuing to remain outstanding under this Agreement).

(l) The Administrative Agent shall have received copies or other evidence of such other approvals and such other opinions or documents as may be reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent or by any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank through the Administrative Agent.


44

SECTION 3.02. Conditions Precedent to each Extension of Credit.
  
The obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank, as applicable, to make each Extension of Credit to be made by it hereunder (other than in connection with any Borrowing that would not increase the aggregate principal amount of Advances outstanding immediately prior to the making of such Borrowing) shall be subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 3.01 and on the date of such Borrowing:
(a)    The following statements shall be true (and each of the giving of the applicable Notice of Borrowing and the acceptance by the Borrower of the proceeds of such Extension of Credit shall constitute a representation and warranty by the Borrower that on the date of such Extension of Credit such statements are true):

(i) The representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in Section 4.01 (other than the representation and warranty in Section 4.01(e) and the representation and warranty set forth in the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date of such Extension of Credit, before and after giving effect to such Extension of Credit and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on and as of such date, and

(ii) No event has occurred and is continuing or would result from such Extension of Credit or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.
  
(b)    The Administrative Agent shall have received copies or other evidence of such other approvals and such other opinions or documents as may be reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent or by any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank through the Administrative Agent.
  
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

SECTION 4.01. Representations and Warranties of the Borrower.
  
The Borrower represents and warrants as follows:
(a)    The Borrower is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated, and each Significant Subsidiary is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated or otherwise organized.
  
(b)    The execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of each Loan Document, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, are within the Borrower’s corporate powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action, and do not contravene (i) the Borrower’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws, (ii) law binding or affecting the Borrower or (iii) any contractual restriction binding on or affecting the Borrower or any of its properties.
  


45

(c)    Each Loan Document has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower. Each Loan Document is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights in general, and except as the availability of the remedy of specific performance is subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such remedy is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law) and subject to requirements of reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing.
  
(d)    No authorization or approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or any other third party is required for the due execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of any Loan Document.
  
(e)    There is no pending or threatened action, suit, investigation, litigation or proceeding, including, without limitation, any Environmental Action, affecting the Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator that is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect, except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents.
  
(f)    The consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2013, March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods then ended (accompanied by, in the case of such financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, an opinion of Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm), copies of each of which have been furnished to each Lender, fairly present (subject, in the case of such financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, to year-end adjustments) the consolidated financial condition of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries as at such dates and the consolidated results of the operations of the Borrower and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for the periods ended on such dates, all in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. Since December 31, 2013, there has been no Material Adverse Change.
  
(g)    No written statement, information, report, financial statement, exhibit or schedule furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent, any Lender or any LC Issuing Bank in connection with the syndication or negotiation of this Agreement or included herein or delivered pursuant hereto contained, contains, or will contain any material misstatement of fact or intentionally omitted, omits, or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were, are, or will be made, not misleading.
  
(h)    Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents, the Borrower and each Significant Subsidiary is in material compliance with all laws (including ERISA and Environmental Laws) rules, regulations and orders of any Governmental Authority applicable to it.
  


46

(i)    No failure to satisfy the minimum funding standard applicable to a Plan for a plan year (as described in Section 302 of ERISA and Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code) that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, whether or not waived, has occurred with respect to any Plan. The Borrower has not incurred, and does not presently expect to incur, any withdrawal liability under Title IV of ERISA with respect to any Multiemployer Plan that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The Borrower and each of its ERISA Affiliates have complied in all material respects with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with foreign law applicable to its Foreign Plans, if any. As used herein, the term “ Plan ” means an “employee pension benefit plan” (as defined in Section 3 of ERISA) which is and has been established or maintained, or to which contributions are or have been made or should be made according to the terms of the plan, by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates. The term “ Multiemployer Plan ” means any Plan which is a “multiemployer plan” (as such term is defined in Section 4001(a)(3) of ERISA). The term “ Foreign Plan ” means any pension, profit-sharing, deferred compensation, or other employee benefit plan, program or arrangement maintained by any Subsidiary which, under applicable local foreign law, is required to be funded through a trust or other funding vehicle.
   
(j)    The Borrower and its Subsidiaries have filed or caused to be filed all material Federal, state and local tax returns that are required to be filed by them, and have paid or caused to be paid all material taxes shown to be due and payable on such returns or on any assessments received by them (to the extent that such taxes and assessments have become due and payable) other than those taxes contested in good faith and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP.
  
(k)    The Borrower is not engaged in the business of extending credit for the purpose of buying or carrying Margin Stock, and no proceeds of any Advance will be used to buy or carry any Margin Stock or to extend credit to others for the purpose of buying or carrying any Margin Stock. Not more than 25% of the assets of the Borrower and the Significant Subsidiaries that are subject to the restrictions of Section 5.02(a), (c) or (d) constitute Margin Stock.
  
(l)    Neither the Borrower nor any Significant Subsidiary is an “investment company,” or an “affiliated person” of, or “promoter” or “principal underwriter” for, an “investment company”, as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither the making of any Extension of Credit, the application of the proceeds or repayment thereof by the Borrower nor the consummation of the other transactions contemplated hereby will violate any provision of such Act or any rule, regulation or order of the SEC thereunder.
  
(m) All Significant Subsidiaries as of the date hereof are listed on Schedule 4.01(m) hereto.

(n) The Borrower has implemented and maintains in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions, and the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors and officers and, to the knowledge of the Borrower, its employees and agents, are in compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions in all material respects. None of (a) the Borrower, any Subsidiary or any of


47

their respective directors or officers, or (b) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any employee or agent of the Borrower or any Subsidiary that will act in any capacity in connection with or benefit from the credit facility established hereby, is a Sanctioned Person. No Borrowing, Letter of Credit, or use of proceeds thereof or other transaction contemplated by this Agreement will violate Anti-Corruption Laws or applicable Sanctions.

ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF THE BORROWER

SECTION 5.01. Affirmative Covenants.
  
So long as any Advance or any other amount payable hereunder shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will:
(a)     Preservation of Existence, Etc. Preserve and maintain, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to preserve and maintain, its corporate, partnership or limited liability company (as the case may be) existence and all material rights (charter and statutory) and franchises; provided , however , that the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary may consummate any merger or consolidation permitted under Section 5.02(a); and provided further that neither the Borrower nor any Significant Subsidiary shall be required to preserve any right or franchise if (i) the board of directors of the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, shall determine that the preservation thereof is no longer desirable in the conduct of the business of the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, and that the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be, or to the Lenders; (ii) required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law; or (iii) required in connection with the RTO Transaction; and provided further, that no Significant Subsidiary shall be required to preserve and maintain its corporate existence if (x) the loss thereof is not disadvantageous in any material respect to the Borrower or to the Lenders or (y) required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law or (z) required in connection with the RTO Transaction.
  
(b)     Compliance with Laws, Etc. Comply, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to comply, in all material respects, with Applicable Law, with such compliance to include, without limitation, compliance with ERISA and Environmental Laws.
  
(c)     Performance and Compliance with Other Agreements . Perform and comply, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to perform and comply, with the provisions of each indenture, credit agreement, contract or other agreement by which it is bound, the non-performance or non-compliance with which would result in a Material Adverse Change.
  
(d)     Inspection Rights . At any reasonable time and from time to time, permit the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender or any agents or representatives thereof to examine and make copies of and abstracts from the records and books of account of, and visit the properties of, the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary and to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Borrower and any Significant Subsidiary with any of their officers or directors and with their independent certified public accountants.


48

(e)     Maintenance of Properties, Etc. Maintain and preserve, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to maintain and preserve, all of its properties that are used or useful in the conduct of its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted and except as required in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law or in connection with RTO Transaction.

(f)     Maintenance of Insurance . Maintain, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to maintain, insurance with responsible and reputable insurance companies or associations in such amounts and covering such risks as is usually carried by companies engaged in similar businesses and owning similar properties; provided , however , that the Borrower and each Significant Subsidiary may self-insure to the same extent as other companies engaged in similar businesses and owning similar properties and to the extent consistent with prudent business practice.
  
(g)     Payment of Taxes, Etc. Pay and discharge, and cause each of its Subsidiaries to pay and discharge, before the same shall become delinquent, (i) all taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies imposed upon it or upon its property and (ii) all lawful claims that, if unpaid, might by law become a Lien upon its property; provided , however , that neither the Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to pay or discharge any such tax, assessment, charge or claim that is being contested in good faith and by proper proceedings and as to which adequate reserves are being maintained in accordance with GAAP, unless and until any Lien resulting therefrom attaches to its property and becomes enforceable against its other creditors.
  
(h)     Keeping of Books . Keep, and cause each Significant Subsidiary to keep, proper books of record and account, in which full and correct entries shall be made of all financial transactions and the assets and business of the Borrower and each such Significant Subsidiary in accordance with GAAP.
  
(i)     Reporting Requirements . Furnish to the Lenders:

(i) as soon as available and in any event within 60 days after the end of each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a copy of the Borrower’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for such quarter, as filed with the SEC, which shall contain a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such quarter and consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the period commencing at the end of the previous fiscal year and ending with the end of such quarter, duly certified (subject to year-end audit adjustments) by the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as having been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and a certificate of the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as to compliance with the terms of this Agreement and (A) certifying that there have been no Subsidiaries that have become Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, or any Subsidiaries that have ceased to be Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, in each case except as expressly identified in such certificate, and (B) setting forth in reasonable detail the calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with Section 5.03, provided that in the


49

event of any change in GAAP used in the preparation of such financial statements, the Borrower shall also provide, if necessary for the determination of compliance with Section 5.03, a statement of reconciliation conforming such financial statements to GAAP in effect on the date hereof;

(ii) as soon as available and in any event within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year of the Borrower, a copy of the Borrower’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year, as filed with the SEC, which shall contain a copy of the annual audit report for such year for the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, containing a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the end of such fiscal year and consolidated statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such fiscal year, in each case accompanied by an opinion by Deloitte & Touche LLP or another independent registered public accounting firm acceptable to the Required Lenders, and consolidating statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for such fiscal year, and a certificate of the chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of the Borrower as to compliance with the terms of this Agreement and (A) certifying that there have been no Subsidiaries that have become Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, or any Subsidiaries that have ceased to be Significant Subsidiaries at any time during such period, in each case except as expressly identified in such certificate, and (B) setting forth in reasonable detail the calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with Section 5.03, provided that in the event of any change in GAAP used in the preparation of such financial statements, the Borrower shall also provide, if necessary for the determination of compliance with Section 5.03, a statement of reconciliation conforming such financial statements to GAAP in effect on the date hereof;

(iii) as soon as possible and in any event within five days after the chief financial officer or treasurer of the Borrower obtains knowledge of the occurrence of each Default continuing on the date of such statement, a statement of the chief financial officer or treasurer of the Borrower setting forth details of such Default and the action that the Borrower has taken and proposes to take with respect thereto;

(iv) promptly after the sending or filing thereof, copies of all Reports on Form 8-K that the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary files with the SEC or any national securities exchange;

(v) promptly after the commencement thereof, notice of all actions and proceedings before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator affecting the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary of the type described in Section 4.01(e); and

(vi) such other information respecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries as any LC Issuing Bank or any Lender through the Administrative Agent may from time to time reasonably request.
  
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the information required to be delivered pursuant to clauses (i), (ii) and (iv) shall be deemed to have been delivered if such information shall be available on the website of the SEC at http://www.sec.gov or any successor website;


50

provided that the compliance certificates required under clauses (i) and (ii) shall be delivered in the manner specified in Section 8.02(b).
(j)     Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and Sanctions . Maintain in effect and enforce policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions.

SECTION 5.02. Negative Covenants.
  
So long as any Advance or any other amount payable hereunder shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower agrees that it will not:

(a)     Mergers, Etc. Merge or consolidate with or into any Person, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to do so, except that (i) any Subsidiary may merge or consolidate with or into any other Subsidiary of the Borrower, (ii) any Subsidiary may merge into the Borrower, (iii) any Significant Subsidiary may merge with or into any other Person so long as such Significant Subsidiary continues to be a Significant Subsidiary of the Borrower and (iv) the Borrower may merge with any other Person so long as the successor entity (if other than the Borrower) assumes, in form reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, all of the obligations of the Borrower under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents and has long-term senior unsecured debt ratings issued (and confirmed after giving effect to such merger) by S&P or Moody’s of at least BBB- and Baa3, respectively (or if no such ratings have been issued, commercial paper ratings issued (and confirmed after giving effect to such merger) by S&P and Moody’s of at least A-3 and P-3, respectively), provided , in each case, that no Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of such proposed transaction or would result therefrom.
  
(b)     Stock of Significant Subsidiaries. Sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, other than (i) in connection with an RTO Transaction, but only if no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from such RTO Transaction, or (ii) pursuant to the requirements of any Restructuring Law, equity interests in any Significant Subsidiary of the Borrower (other than AEP Resources, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc. or CSW Energy, Inc.) if such Significant Subsidiary would cease to be a Subsidiary as a result of such sale, lease, transfer or disposition.
  
(c)     Sales, Etc. of Assets . Sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, or permit any Significant Subsidiary (other than AEP Resources, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc. or CSW Energy, Inc.) to sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of, any assets, or grant any option or other right to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire any assets, except (i) sales in the ordinary course of its business, (ii) sales, leases, transfers or dispositions of assets to any Person that is not a wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Borrower that in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the Consolidated Tangible Net Assets of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, whether in one transaction or a series of transactions, (iii) other sales, leases, transfers and dispositions made in connection with an RTO Transaction or pursuant to the requirements of any Restructuring Law or to a wholly owned Subsidiary of the Borrower, or (iv) sales of pollution control assets to a state or local government or any political subdivision or agency thereof in connection with any


51

transaction with such Person pursuant to which such Person sells or otherwise transfers such pollution control assets back to the Borrower or a Subsidiary under an installment sale, loan or similar agreement, in each case in connection with the issuance of pollution control or similar bonds.

(d)     Liens, Etc. Create or suffer to exist, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to create or suffer to exist, any Lien on or with respect to any of its properties, including, without limitation, on or with respect to equity interests in any Subsidiary of the Borrower, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, or assign, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to assign, any right to receive income (other than in connection with Stranded Cost Recovery Bonds and the sale of accounts receivable by the Borrower), other than (i) Permitted Liens, (ii) the Liens existing on the date hereof, (iii) Liens securing first mortgage bonds issued by any Subsidiary of the Borrower the rates or charges of which are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any state governmental authority, provided that the aggregate principal amount of such first mortgage bonds of any such Subsidiary do not exceed 66 2/3% of the net value of plant, property and equipment of such Subsidiary and (iv) the replacement, extension or renewal of any Lien permitted by clauses (ii) and (iii) above upon or in the same property theretofore subject thereto or the replacement, extension or renewal (without increase in the amount or change in any direct or contingent obligor) of the Debt secured thereby.
  
(e)     Restrictive Agreements . Enter into, or permit any Significant Subsidiary to enter into (except in connection with or pursuant to any Restructuring Law), any agreement after the date hereof, or amend, supplement or otherwise modify any agreement existing on the date hereof, that imposes any restriction on the ability of any Significant Subsidiary to make payments, directly or indirectly, to its shareholders by way of dividends, advances, repayment of loans or intercompany charges, expenses and accruals or other returns on investments that is more restrictive than any such restriction applicable to such Significant Subsidiary on the date hereof; provided , however , that any Significant Subsidiary may agree to a financial covenant limiting its ratio of Consolidated Debt to Consolidated Capital to no more than 0.675 to 1.000.

(f)     ERISA . (i) Terminate or withdraw from, or permit any of its ERISA Affiliates to terminate or withdraw from, any Plan with respect to which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates may have any liability by reason of such termination or withdrawal, if such termination or withdrawal could have a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) incur a full or partial withdrawal, or permit any ERISA Affiliate to incur a full or partial withdrawal, from any Multiemployer Plan with respect to which the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates may have any liability by reason of such withdrawal, if such withdrawal could have a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) otherwise fail, or permit any of its ERISA Affiliates to fail, to comply in all material respects with ERISA or the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code if such noncompliances, singly or in the aggregate, could have a Material Adverse Effect, or (iv) fail, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to fail, to comply with Applicable Law with respect to any Foreign Plan if such noncompliances, singly or in the aggregate, could have a Material Adverse Effect.
  
(g)     Margin Stock . Use the proceeds of any Extension of Credit to buy or carry Margin Stock.


52

(h)     No Violation of Anti-Corruption Laws or Sanctions . Request any Borrowing or Letter of Credit, or use or permit any of its Subsidiaries or its or their respective directors, officers, employees and agents to use, directly or, to the actual knowledge of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, indirectly, any Letter of Credit or the proceeds of any Borrowing or Letter of Credit (A) in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment or giving of money, or anything else of value, to any Person in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws, (B) for the purpose of funding, financing or facilitating any activities, business or transaction of or with any Sanctioned Person, or in any Sanctioned Country, or (C) in any manner that would result in the violation of any Sanctions applicable to any party hereto.

SECTION 5.03. Financial Covenant.
  
So long as any Advance shall remain unpaid, any Letter of Credit shall remain outstanding or any Lender shall have any Commitment hereunder, the Borrower will maintain a ratio of Consolidated Debt to Consolidated Capital, as of the last day of each March, June, September and December, of not greater than 0.675 to 1.000.
ARTICLE VI
EVENTS OF DEFAULT

SECTION 6.01. Events of Default.
  
If any of the following events (“ Events of Default ”) shall occur and be continuing:
(a)    The Borrower shall fail to pay any principal of any Advance when the same becomes due and payable, or shall fail to pay any interest on any Advance or make any other payment of fees or other amounts payable under this Agreement within five days after the same becomes due and payable; or

(b)    Any representation or warranty made by the Borrower herein or by the Borrower (or any of its officers) in connection with this Agreement shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made; or

(c)    (i) The Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 5.01(a), 5.01(i)(iii) or 5.02 (other than Section 5.02(f)), or (ii) the Borrower shall fail to provide cash collateral in accordance with Section 2.04(b), 2.09(b), 8.16(a)(v) or 8.17, or (iii) the Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any other term, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement or any other Loan Document if such failure shall remain unremedied for 30 days after written notice thereof shall have been given to the Borrower by the Administrative Agent or any Lender; or

(d)    Any event shall occur or condition shall exist under any agreement or instrument relating to Debt of the Borrower (but excluding Debt outstanding hereunder) or any Significant Subsidiary outstanding in a principal or notional amount of at least $50,000,000 in the aggregate if the effect of such event or condition is to accelerate or require early termination of the maturity or tenor of such Debt, or any such Debt shall be declared to be due and payable, or required to be prepaid or redeemed (other than by a regularly scheduled required prepayment or redemption), terminated, purchased or defeased, or an offer to prepay, redeem, purchase or defease such Debt


53

shall be required to be made, in each case prior to the stated maturity or the original tenor thereof; or

(e)    The Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary shall generally not pay its debts as such debts become due, or shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally, or shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or any proceeding shall be instituted by or against the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking liquidation, winding up, reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, protection, relief, or composition of it or its debts under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization or relief of debtors, or seeking the entry of an order for relief or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for it or for any substantial part of its property and, in the case of any such proceeding instituted against it (but not instituted by it), either such proceeding shall remain undismissed or unstayed for a period of 60 days, or any of the actions sought in such proceeding (including, without limitation, the entry of an order for relief against, or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for, it or for any substantial part of its property) shall occur; or the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary shall take any corporate action to authorize any of the actions set forth above in this subsection (e); or

(f)    (i) Any entity, person (within the meaning of Section 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”)) or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) that as of the date hereof was beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of less than 30% of the Borrower’s Voting Stock shall acquire a beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the SEC under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of Voting Stock of the Borrower (or other securities convertible into such Voting Stock) representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of all Voting Stock of the Borrower; or (ii) during any period of up to 24 consecutive months, commencing after the date hereof, individuals who at the beginning of such 24-month period were directors of the Borrower shall cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of the Borrower, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof, whose election, or nomination for election by the Borrower’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors of the board of directors of the Borrower as comprised as of the date hereof (other than the election or nomination of an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the directors of the Borrower) shall be, for purposes of this provision, considered as though such person were a member of the board as of the date hereof; or

(g)    Any judgment or order for the payment of money in excess of $50,000,000 in the case of the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary to the extent not paid or insured shall be rendered against the Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary and either (i) enforcement proceedings shall have been commenced by any creditor upon such judgment or order or (ii) there shall be any period of 30 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement of such judgment or order, by reason of a pending appeal or otherwise, shall not be in effect; or

(h)    (i) The termination of or withdrawal from the United Mine Workers’ of America 1974 Pension Trust by the Borrower or any of its ERISA Affiliates shall have occurred and the liability of the Borrower and its ERISA Affiliates related to such termination or withdrawal


54

exceeds $75,000,000 in the aggregate; or (ii) any other ERISA Event shall have occurred and the liability of the Borrower and its ERISA Affiliates related to such ERISA Event exceeds $50,000,000;

then, and in any such event, the Administrative Agent (i) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank to make Extensions of Credit to be terminated, whereupon the same shall forthwith terminate, and (ii) shall at the request, or may with the consent, of the Required Lenders, by notice to the Borrower, declare the outstanding Borrowings, all interest thereon and all other amounts payable under this Agreement to be forthwith due and payable, whereupon the outstanding Borrowings, all such interest and all such amounts shall become and be forthwith due and payable by the Borrower, without presentment, demand, protest or further notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower; provided , however , that in the event of an actual or deemed entry of an order for relief with respect to the Borrower under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, (A) the obligation of each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank to make Extensions of Credit shall automatically be terminated and (B) the outstanding Borrowings, all such interest and all such amounts shall automatically become and be due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or any notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower.

SECTION 6.02. Actions in Respect of the Letters of Credit upon Default.

If any Event of Default described in Section 6.01(e) shall have occurred and be continuing or the Borrowings shall have otherwise been accelerated or the Commitments terminated pursuant to Section 6.01, then the Administrative Agent may, or shall at the request of the Required Lenders, make demand upon the Borrower to, and forthwith upon such demand the Borrower will, deposit in the LC Collateral Account with the Administrative Agent, in the name of the Administrative Agent and for the benefit of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, in same day funds, an amount equal to 103% of the aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date. If at any time the Administrative Agent determines that any funds held in the LC Collateral Account are subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks or that the total amount of such funds is less than 103% of the aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date, the Borrower will, forthwith upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay to the Administrative Agent, as additional funds to be deposited and held in the LC Collateral Account, an amount equal to the excess of (i) 103% of such aggregate undrawn stated amounts of all Letters of Credit that are outstanding on such date over (ii) the total amount of funds, if any, then held in the LC Collateral Account that the Administrative Agent determines to be free and clear of any such right and claim. Upon the drawing of any Letter of Credit for which funds are on deposit in the LC Collateral Account, such funds shall be applied to reimburse the relevant LC Issuing Bank or Lender holding a participation in the reimbursement obligation of the Borrower to such LC Issuing Bank to the extent permitted by applicable law.


55

ARTICLE VII
THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

SECTION 7.01. Authorization and Action.
  
Each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank hereby appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under this Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms hereof, together with such powers and discretion as are reasonably incidental thereto. As to any matters expressly provided for in this Agreement as being subject to the discretion of the Administrative Agent, such matters shall be subject to the sole discretion of the Administrative Agent, its directors, officers, agents and employees. As to any matters not expressly provided for by this Agreement (including, without limitation, enforcement or collection of the outstanding Borrowings), the Administrative Agent shall not be required to exercise any discretion or take any action, but shall be required to act or to refrain from acting (and shall be fully protected in so acting or refraining from acting) upon the instructions of the Required Lenders, and such instructions shall be binding upon all Lenders; provided , however , that the Administrative Agent shall not be required to take any action that exposes the Administrative Agent to personal liability or that is contrary to this Agreement or Applicable Law. The Administrative Agent agrees to give to each Lender prompt notice of each notice given to it by the Borrower pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 7.02. Agent’s Reliance, Etc.
  
Neither the Administrative Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them under or in connection with this Agreement, except for its or their own gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, the Administrative Agent: (i) may treat each Lender recorded in the Register as the owner of the Commitment recorded for such Lender in the Register until the Administrative Agent receives and accepts an Assignment and Assumption entered into by such Lender, as assignor, and an Eligible Assignee, as assignee, as provided in Section 8.07 and except as provided otherwise in Section 8.16; (ii) may consult with legal counsel (including counsel for the Borrower), independent public accountants and other experts selected by it and shall not be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken in good faith by it in accordance with the advice of such counsel, accountants or experts; (iii) makes no warranty or representation to any Lender and shall not be responsible to any Lender for any statements, warranties or representations (whether written or oral) made in or in connection with this Agreement; (iv) shall not have any duty to ascertain or to inquire as to the performance or observance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement on the part of any Lender or to inspect the property (including the books and records) of any Lender; (v) shall not be responsible to any Lender for the due execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, this Agreement or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; (vi) shall incur no liability under or in respect of this Agreement by acting upon any notice, consent, certificate or other instrument or writing (which may be by fax) believed by it to be genuine and signed or sent by the proper party or parties; and (vii) shall not have any fiduciary duty to any other Lender.


56

SECTION 7.03. JPMorgan Chase and its Affiliates.
  
With respect to its Commitments and the Advances made by it, JPMorgan Chase shall have the same rights and powers under this Agreement as any other Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Administrative Agent; and the term “Lender” or “Lenders” shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated, include JPMorgan Chase in its individual capacity. JPMorgan Chase and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, act as trustee under indentures of, accept investment banking engagements from and generally engage in any kind of business with, any Lender, any of its Subsidiaries and any Person who may do business with or own securities of any Lender or any such Subsidiary, all as if JPMorgan Chase were not the Administrative Agent and without any duty to account therefor to the Lenders.
SECTION 7.04. Lender Credit Decision.
  
Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on the financial statements referred to in Section 4.01 and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement.
SECTION 7.05. Indemnification.
  
Each Lender severally agrees to indemnify the Administrative Agent (to the extent not promptly reimbursed by the Borrower and without limiting its obligation to do so) from and against such Lender’s ratable share (determined as provided below) of any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind or nature whatsoever that may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Administrative Agent in any way relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any action taken or omitted by the Administrative Agent under this Agreement; provided , however , that no Lender shall be liable for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting from the Administrative Agent’s gross negligence or willful misconduct as determined in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. Without limitation of the foregoing, each Lender agrees to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any costs and expenses (including, without limitation, fees and reasonable expenses of counsel) payable by the Borrower under Section 8.04, to the extent that the Administrative Agent is not promptly reimbursed for such costs and expenses by the Borrower after request therefor and without limiting the Borrower’s obligation to do so. For purposes of this Section 7.05, the Lenders’ respective ratable shares of any amount shall be determined, at any time, according to the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of the Advances outstanding at such time and owing to the respective Lenders and (ii) the aggregate unused portions of their respective Commitments at such time. In the event that any Lender shall have failed to make any Advance as required hereunder, such Lender’s Commitment shall be considered to be unused for purposes of this Section 7.05 to the extent of the amount of such Advance. The failure of any Lender to reimburse the Administrative Agent promptly upon demand for its ratable share of any amount


57

required to be paid by the Lender to the Administrative Agent as provided herein shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation hereunder to reimburse the Administrative Agent for its ratable share of such amount, but no Lender shall be responsible for the failure of any other Lender to reimburse the Administrative Agent for such other Lender’s ratable share of such amount. Without prejudice to the survival of any other agreement of any Lender hereunder, the agreement and obligations of each Lender contained in this Section 7.05 shall survive the payment in full of principal, interest and all other amounts payable hereunder.
SECTION 7.06. Successor Agent.
  
The Administrative Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Lenders and the Borrower. Upon any such resignation, the Required Lenders shall have the right to appoint a successor Agent to the Administrative Agent that has resigned. If no successor Administrative Agent shall have been so appointed by the Required Lenders, and shall have accepted such appointment, within 30 days after the retiring Administrative Agent’s giving of notice of resignation, then such retiring Administrative Agent may, on behalf of the Lenders, appoint a successor Administrative Agent, which shall be a Lender or an Affiliate of a Lender that is commercial bank organized under the laws of the United States or of any State thereof and having a combined capital and surplus of at least $500,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Administrative Agent hereunder by a successor Agent, such successor Administrative Agent shall succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, discretion, privileges and duties of the retiring Administrative Agent, and the retiring Administrative Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations under this Agreement. After any retiring Administrative Agent’s resignation hereunder as Administrative Agent, the provisions of this Article VII shall inure to its benefit as to any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was Administrative Agent under this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS

SECTION 8.01. Amendments, Etc.
  
Subject to Section 8.16(a)(i), no amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the Required Lenders and the Borrower, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given; provided, however , that no amendment, waiver or consent shall (a) unless in writing and signed by all the Lenders (other than, in the case of the following clauses (i) through (iv), any Defaulting Lender), do any of the following: (i) amend Section 3.01 or 3.02 or waive any of the conditions specified therein, (ii) increase the aggregate amount of the Commitments (except pursuant to Section 2.07), (iii) change the definition of Required Lenders or the percentage of the Commitments or of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the outstanding Borrowings, or the number or percentage of the Lenders, that shall be required for the Lenders or any of them to take any action hereunder, or (iv) amend or waive this Section 8.01 or any provision of this Agreement that requires pro rata treatment of the Lenders; or (b) unless in writing and signed by each Lender that is directly affected thereby, do any of the following: (1) increase the amount or extend the termination date of such Lender’s Commitment, or subject


58

such Lender to any additional obligations, (2) reduce the principal of, or interest on, or rate of interest applicable to, the outstanding Advances of such Lender or any fees or other amounts payable to such Lender hereunder, or (3) postpone any date fixed for any payment of principal of, or interest on, the outstanding Advances or any fees or other amounts payable to such Lender hereunder; and provided further that (x) no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent or any LC Issuing Bank in addition to the Lenders required above to take such action, affect the rights or duties of the Administrative Agent or such LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, under this Agreement, and (y) no amendment, waiver or consent shall, unless in writing and signed by the Administrative Agent, each LC Issuing Bank and the Required Lenders, amend or waive Section 8.16. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any provision of this Agreement may be amended by an agreement in writing entered into by the Borrower, the Required Lenders and the Administrative Agent if (i) by the terms of such agreement the Commitment of each Lender and the obligations of each LC Issuing Bank not consenting to the amendment provided for therein shall terminate (but such Lender or LC Issuing Bank shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18 and 8.04) upon the effectiveness of such amendment and (ii) at the time such amendment becomes effective, each Lender or LC Issuing Bank not consenting thereto receives payment in full of the principal outstanding amount of and interest accrued on each Advance made by it or any Letter of Credit issued by it and outstanding, as the case may be, and all other amounts owing to it or accrued for its account under this Agreement and is released from its obligations hereunder.
SECTION 8.02. Notices, Etc.
  
(a) The Borrower hereby agrees that any notice that is required to be delivered to it hereunder shall be delivered to the Borrower as set forth in this Section 8.02. All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing (including fax) and mailed, faxed or delivered, if to the Borrower at its address at 1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215, Attention: Treasurer (fax: (614) 716-2807; telephone: (614) 716-2885; email: jsloat@aep.com), with a copy to the General Counsel (fax: (614) 716-1687; telephone: (614) 716-2929); if to any Initial Lender, at its Domestic Lending Office specified in its Administrative Questionnaire; if to any other Lender, at its Domestic Lending Office specified in the Assignment and Assumption pursuant to which it became a Lender; if to the Administrative Agent, at its address at (i) 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Ops 2, Floor 03, Newark, Delaware 19713-2107, Attention: Siyana Custis, Loan & Agency Services Deal Management Team (fax: (302) 634-1417; telephone: (302) 634-1845; email: Siyana.c.custis@jpmorgan.com) or (ii) for notices and communications relating to compliance with the covenants hereunder, JP Morgan Services India PVT Ltd (CCDT DMU), Sarjapur Outer Ring Rd, Vathur Hobli, Floor 04 Bangalore, 560 087, India, Attention: Covenant Compliance Analyst, (telephone: +(866) 872-7313; email: Ccdt.dmu@jpmorgan.com ); if to any LC Issuing Bank, at such address as shall be designated by such LC Issuing Bank and notified to the Lenders pursuant to Section 2.04; or, as to the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other parties and, as to each other party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent. All such notices and communications shall be effective when delivered or received at the appropriate address or number to the attention of the appropriate individual or department, except that notices and communications to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Article II, III or VII shall not be effective until received by the Administrative Agent. Delivery by fax of an executed counterpart


59

of any amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any Exhibit hereto to be executed and delivered hereunder shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart thereof.

(b)    The Borrower and the Lenders hereby agree that the Administrative Agent may make any information required to be delivered under Section 5.01(i)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v) (the “ Communications ”) available to the Lenders by posting the Communications on Intralinks, SyndTrak or a substantially similar electronic transmission systems (the “ Platform ”). The Borrower and the Lenders hereby acknowledge that the distribution of material through an electronic medium is not necessarily secure and that there are confidentiality and other risks associated with such distribution.

(c)    THE PLATFORM IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE”. THE AGENT PARTIES (AS DEFINED BELOW) DO NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE COMMUNICATIONS, OR THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLATFORM AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM LIABILITY FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE COMMUNICATIONS. NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD-PARTY RIGHTS OR FREEDOM FROM VIRUSES OR OTHER CODE DEFECTS, IS MADE BY THE AGENT PARTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMMUNICATIONS OR THE PLATFORM. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT OR ANY OF ITS RELATED PARTIES (COLLECTIVELY, “ AGENT PARTIES ”) HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO THE BORROWER, ANY LENDER OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LOSSES OR EXPENSES (WHETHER IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF THE BORROWER’S OR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT’S TRANSMISSION OF COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH THE INTERNET, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THE LIABILITY OF ANY AGENT PARTY IS FOUND IN A FINAL, NON-APPEALABLE JUDGMENT BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION TO HAVE RESULTED PRIMARILY FROM SUCH AGENT PARTY’S GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT.

The Administrative Agent agrees that the receipt of the Communications by the Administrative Agent at its e-mail address set forth above shall constitute effective delivery of the Communications to the Administrative Agent for purposes of the Loan Documents. Each Lender agrees that notice to it (as provided in the next sentence) specifying that the Communications have been posted to the Platform shall constitute effective delivery of the Communications to such Lender for purposes of the Loan Documents. Each Lender agrees (i) to notify the Administrative Agent in writing (including by electronic communication) from time to time of such Lender’s e-mail address to which the foregoing notice may be sent by electronic transmission and (ii) that the foregoing notice may be sent to such e-mail address.
Nothing herein shall prejudice the right of the Administrative Agent or any Lender to give any notice or other communication pursuant to any Loan Document in any other manner specified in such Loan Document.


60

SECTION 8.03. No Waiver; Remedies.
  
No failure on the part of any Lender or the Administrative Agent to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. The remedies herein provided are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
SECTION 8.04. Costs and Expenses.
  
(a)    The Borrower agrees to pay promptly upon demand all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration, modification and amendment of this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder, including, without limitation, (i) all due diligence, syndication (including printing, distribution and bank meetings), transportation, computer, duplication, appraisal, consultant, and audit expenses and (ii) the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel for the Administrative Agent with respect thereto and with respect to advising the Administrative Agent as to its rights and responsibilities under this Agreement. The Borrower further agrees to pay promptly upon demand all costs and expenses of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, if any (including, without limitation, counsel fees and expenses), in connection with the enforcement (whether through negotiations, legal proceedings or otherwise) of this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder, including, without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of counsel for the Administrative Agent, LC Issuing Banks and the Lenders in connection with the enforcement of rights under this Section 8.04(a).
  
(b)    The Borrower agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Lender, each LC Issuing Bank, and the Administrative Agent and each of their Related Parties (each, an “ Indemnified Party ”) from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and liabilities, joint or several, to which any such Indemnified Party may become subject, in each case arising out of or in connection with or relating to (including, without limitation, in connection with any investigation, litigation or proceeding or preparation of a defense in connection therewith) (i) this Agreement, any of the transactions contemplated herein or the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Extensions of Credit (ii) any error or omission in connection with posting of the data required to be delivered pursuant to Section 5.01(i)(i), (ii) or (iv) on the website of the SEC or any successor website or (iii) the actual or alleged presence of Hazardous Materials on any property of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any Environmental Action relating in any way to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, and to reimburse any Indemnified Party for any and all reasonable expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of counsel) as they are incurred in connection with the investigation of or preparation for or defense of any pending or threatened claim or any action or proceeding arising therefrom, whether or not such Indemnified Party is a party and whether or not such claim, action or proceeding is initiated or brought by or on behalf of the Borrower or any of its Affiliates and whether or not any of the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated or this Agreement is terminated, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss, liability or expense is found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from such Indemnified Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. In the case of an investigation, litigation or other proceeding to which the indemnity in this Section 8.04(b) applies, such indemnity shall be


61

effective whether or not such investigation, litigation or proceeding is brought by the Borrower, its directors, shareholders or creditors or an Indemnified Party or any other Person or any Indemnified Party is otherwise a party thereto and whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated. The Borrower agrees not to assert any claim against any Indemnified Party on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or otherwise relating to this Agreement, any of the transactions contemplated herein or the actual or proposed use of the proceeds of the Extensions of Credit.
  
(c)    If any payment of principal of, or Conversion of, any Eurodollar Rate Advance is made by the Borrower to or for the account of a Lender other than on the last day of the Interest Period for such Advance, as a result of a payment or Conversion pursuant to Section 2.09, 2.12(d), 2.15 or 2.17, acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding Borrowings pursuant to Section 6.01, the assignment of any such Advance pursuant to Section 2.20(b) or for any other reason (in the case of any such payment or Conversion), the Borrower shall, promptly upon demand by such Lender (with a copy of such demand to the Administrative Agent), pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of such Lender any amounts required to compensate such Lender for any additional losses, costs or expenses that it may reasonably incur as a result of such payment or Conversion, including, without limitation, any loss (other than loss of Applicable Margin), cost or expense incurred by reason of the liquidation or reemployment of deposits or other funds acquired by any Lender to fund or maintain such Advance.
  
(d)    Without prejudice to the survival of any other agreement of the Borrower hereunder, the agreements and obligations of the Borrower contained in Sections 2.15 and 8.04 shall survive the payment in full of principal, interest and all other amounts payable hereunder.
  
(e)    The Borrower agrees that no Indemnified Party shall have any liability (whether direct or indirect, in contract or tort or otherwise) to the Borrower or its security holders or creditors related to or arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the Extensions of Credit or the use or proposed use of the proceeds thereof, any of the transactions contemplated by any of the foregoing or in the loan documentation or the performance by an Indemnified Party of any of the foregoing (including the use by unintended recipients of any information or other materials distributed through telecommunications, electronic or other information transmission systems in connection with this Agreement or the other Loan Documents) except to the extent that any loss, claim, damage, liability or expense is found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from such Indemnified Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
  
(f)    In the event that an Indemnified Party is requested or required to appear as a witness in any action brought by or on behalf of or against the Borrower or any of its Affiliates in which such Indemnified Party is not named as a defendant, the Borrower agrees to reimburse such Indemnified Party for all reasonable expenses incurred by it in connection with such Indemnified Party’s appearing and preparing to appear as such a witness, including, without limitation, the fees and disbursements of its legal counsel.


62

SECTION 8.05. Right of Set-off.
  
Upon (i) the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default and (ii) the making of the request or the granting of the consent specified by Section 6.01 to authorize the Administrative Agent to declare the outstanding Borrowings due and payable pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.01, each Credit Party and each of its Affiliates is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other indebtedness at any time owing by such Credit Party or such Affiliate to or for the credit or the account of the Borrower against any and all of the obligations of the Borrower now or hereafter existing under this Agreement held by such Credit Party, whether or not such Credit Party shall have made any demand under this Agreement and although such obligations may be unmatured; provided that, in the event that any Defaulting Lender shall exercise any such right of setoff, (x) all amounts so set off shall be paid over immediately to the Administrative Agent for further application in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.16 and, pending such payment, shall be segregated by such Defaulting Lender from its other funds and deemed held in trust for the benefit of the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Lenders, and (y) the Defaulting Lender shall provide promptly to the Administrative Agent a statement describing in reasonable detail the obligations of the Borrower owing to such Defaulting Lender as to which it exercised such right of setoff. Each Credit Party agrees promptly to notify the Borrower after any such set-off and application, provided that the failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such set-off and application. The rights of each Credit Party and its Affiliates under this Section are in addition to other rights and remedies (including, without limitation, other rights of set-off) that such Credit Party and its Affiliates may have.
SECTION 8.06. Binding Effect.
  
This Agreement shall become effective upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent specified in Section 3.01 and thereafter shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, each Lender and each LC Issuing Bank (upon its appointment pursuant to Section 2.04(a)) and their respective successors and assigns, except that the Borrower shall not have the right to assign its rights hereunder or any interest herein without the prior written consent of all of the Lenders. None of the Joint Lead Arrangers nor any Person designated as a “Documentation Agent” or a “Syndication Agent” with respect to this Agreement shall have any duties under this Agreement.
SECTION 8.07. Assignments and Participations.
  
(b) Successors and Assigns of Lenders Generally . No Lender may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (i) to an assignee in accordance with the provisions of subsection (b) of this Section, (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Section, or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of subsection (e) of this Section (and any other attempted assignment or transfer by any party hereto shall be null and void). Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in subsection (d) of this Section and, to the extent expressly contemplated


63

hereby, the Related Parties of each of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.
 
(b)     Assignments by Lenders . Any Lender may at any time assign to one or more assignees all or a portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and the Advances at the time owing to it); provided that any such assignment shall be subject to the following conditions:

(i) Minimum Amounts .
  
(A)    in the case of an assignment of the entire remaining amount of the assigning Lender’s Commitment and/or the Advances at the time owing to it or contemporaneous assignments to related Approved Funds (determined after giving effect to such assignments) that equal at least the amount specified in subsection (b)(i)(B) of this Section in the aggregate or in the case of an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund, no minimum amount need be assigned; and
(B)    in any case not described in subsection (b)(i)(A) of this Section, the aggregate amount of the Commitment (which for this purpose includes Advances outstanding thereunder) or, if the applicable Commitment is not then in effect, the principal outstanding balance of the Advances of the assigning Lender subject to each such assignment (determined as of the date the Assignment and Assumption with respect to such assignment is delivered to the Administrative Agent or, if the “ Trade Date ” is specified in the Assignment and Assumption, as of the Trade Date) shall not be less than $10,000,000, or an integral multiple of $1,000,000 in excess thereof, unless each of the Administrative Agent and, so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing, the Borrower otherwise consents (each such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed).
(ii) Proportionate Amounts . Each partial assignment shall be made as an assignment of a proportionate part of all the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Advances or the Commitment assigned.

(iii) Required Consents . No consent shall be required for any assignment except to the extent required by subsection (b)(i)(B) of this Section and, in addition:

(A)    the consent of the Borrower (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) shall be required unless (x) a Default has occurred and is continuing at the time of such assignment, or (y) such assignment is to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund; provided that the Borrower shall be deemed to have consented to any such assignment unless it shall object thereto by written notice to the Administrative Agent within ten Business Days after having received notice thereof;
(B)    the consent of the Administrative Agent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) shall be required for assignments if such


64

assignment is to a Person that is not a Lender, an Affiliate of such Lender or an Approved Fund with respect to such Lender; and
(C)    the consent of each LC Issuing Bank shall be required for any assignment.
(iv) Assignment and Assumption . The parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500 (to be paid by the assigning Lender, or, in the case of an assignment pursuant to Section 2.20(b), the Borrower); provided that the Administrative Agent may, in its sole discretion, elect to waive such processing and recordation fee in the case of any assignment . The assignee, if it is not a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire.

(v) No Assignment to Certain Persons . No such assignment shall be made to (A) the Borrower or any of the Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries or (B) to any Defaulting Lender or any of its Subsidiaries, or any Person who, upon becoming a Lender hereunder, would constitute a Defaulting Lender or a Subsidiary thereof.

(vi) No Assignment to Natural Persons . No such assignment shall be made to a natural Person (or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person).
  
(vii) Certain Additional Payments . In connection with any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder, no such assignment shall be effective unless and until, in addition to the other conditions thereto set forth herein, the parties to the assignment shall make such additional payments to the Administrative Agent in an aggregate amount sufficient, upon distribution thereof as appropriate (which may be outright payment, purchases by the assignee of participations or subparticipations, or other compensating actions, including funding, with the consent of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, the applicable pro rata share of Advances previously requested but not funded by the Defaulting Lender, to each of which the applicable assignee and assignor hereby irrevocably consent), to (x) pay and satisfy in full all payment liabilities then owed by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent and each Lender hereunder (and interest accrued thereon), and (y) acquire (and fund as appropriate) its full pro rata share of all Advances and Commitments in accordance with its Commitment Percentage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any assignment of rights and obligations of any Defaulting Lender hereunder shall become effective under Applicable Law without compliance with the provisions of this subsection, then the assignee of such interest shall be deemed to be a Defaulting Lender for all purposes of this Agreement until such compliance occurs.

Subject to acceptance and recording thereof by the Administrative Agent pursuant to subsection (c) of this Section, from and after the effective date specified in each Assignment and Assumption, the assignee thereunder shall be a party to this Agreement and, to the extent of the interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, have the rights and obligations of a Lender under this Agreement, and the assigning Lender thereunder shall, to the extent of the


65

interest assigned by such Assignment and Assumption, be released from its obligations under this Agreement (and, in the case of an Assignment and Assumption covering all of the assigning Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, such Lender shall cease to be a party hereto) but shall continue to be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18 and 8.04 with respect to facts and circumstances occurring prior to the effective date of such assignment; provided , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the affected parties, no assignment by a Defaulting Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender. Any assignment or transfer by a Lender of rights or obligations under this Agreement that does not comply with this subsection shall be treated for purposes of this Agreement as a sale by such Lender of a participation in such rights and obligations in accordance with subsection (d) of this Section.
(c)     Register . The Administrative Agent, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, shall maintain at its address referred to in Section 8.02 a copy of each Assignment and Assumption delivered to it and a register in which it shall record the names and addresses of the Lenders, and the Commitments of, and principal amounts (and stated interest) of the Advances owing to, each Lender pursuant to the terms hereof from time to time (the “ Register ”). The entries in the Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Register pursuant to the terms hereof as a Lender hereunder for all purposes of this Agreement. The Register shall be available for inspection by the Borrower and any Lender, at any reasonable time and from time to time upon reasonable prior notice.

(d)     Participations . Any Lender may at any time, without the consent of, or notice to, the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, or any LC Issuing Bank, sell participations to any Person (other than a natural Person, or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of, a natural Person, or the Borrower or any of the Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries) (each, a “ Participant ”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and/or obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and/or the Advances owing to it); provided that (i) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (ii) such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations, and (iii) the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks and Lenders shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, each Lender shall be responsible for the indemnity under Section 7.05 with respect to any payments made by such Lender to its Participant(s).

Any agreement or instrument pursuant to which a Lender sells such a participation shall provide that such Lender shall retain the sole right to enforce this Agreement and to approve any amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement; provided that such agreement or instrument may provide that such Lender will not, without the consent of the Participant, agree to any amendment, modification or waiver described in clauses (ii), (iii) or (iv) of the first sentence of Section 8.01 that affects such Participant The Borrower agrees that each Participant shall be entitled to the benefits of Sections 2.15, 2.18, 8.04(b) and 8.04(c) (subject to the requirements and limitations therein, including the requirements under Section 2.18(g) (it being understood that the documentation required under Section 2.18(g) shall be delivered to the participating Lender)) to the same extent as if it were a Lender and had


66

acquired its interest by assignment pursuant to subsection (b) of this Section; provided that such Participant (A) agrees to be subject to the provisions of Section 2.20(b) as if it were an assignee under subsection (b) of this Section; and (B) shall not be entitled to receive any greater payment under Sections 2.15 or 2.18, with respect to any participation, than its participating Lender would have been entitled to receive, except to the extent such entitlement to receive a greater payment results from a Change in Law that occurs after the Participant acquired the applicable participation. Each Lender that sells a participation agrees, at the Borrower’s request and expense, to use reasonable efforts to cooperate with the Borrower to effectuate the provisions of Section 2.20(b) with respect to any Participant. To the extent permitted by law, each Participant also shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 8.05 as though it were a Lender; provided that such Participant agrees to be subject to Section 2.18 as though it were a Lender. Each Lender that sells a participation shall, acting solely for this purpose as a non-fiduciary agent of the Borrower, maintain a register on which it enters the name and address of each Participant and the principal amounts (and stated interest) of each Participant’s interest in the Commitments, Advances or other obligations under the Loan Documents (the “ Participant Register ”); provided that no Lender shall have any obligation to disclose all or any portion of the Participant Register (including the identity of any Participant or any information relating to a Participant’s interest in any Commitments, Advances, Letters of Credit or its other obligations under any Loan Document) to any Person except to the extent that such disclosure is necessary to establish that such Commitments, Advances, Letters of Credit or other obligations are in registered form under Section 5f.103-1(c) of the United States Treasury Regulations. The entries in the Participant Register shall be conclusive absent manifest error, and such Lender shall treat each Person whose name is recorded in the Participant Register as the owner of such participation for all purposes of this Agreement notwithstanding any notice to the contrary. For the avoidance of doubt, the Administrative Agent (in its capacity as Administrative Agent) shall have no responsibility for maintaining a Participant Register.
(e)     Certain Pledges . Any Lender may at any time pledge or assign a security interest in all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement to secure obligations of such Lender, including any pledge or assignment to secure obligations to a Federal Reserve Bank or other central banking authority; provided that no such pledge or assignment shall release such Lender from any of its obligations hereunder or substitute any such pledgee or assignee for such Lender as a party hereto.
 
SECTION 8.08. Confidentiality.
  
Each of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks agree to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information, except that Confidential Information may be disclosed (a) to its Affiliates and to its Related Parties (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Confidential Information and instructed to keep such Confidential Information confidential); (b) to the extent required or requested by any regulatory authority purporting to have jurisdiction over such Person or its Related Parties (including any state, federal or foreign authority or examiner regulating banks, banking or other financial institutions and any self-regulatory authority, such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners); (c) to the extent required by Applicable Law or by any subpoena or similar legal process; (d) to any other party hereto; (e) in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or under any other


67

Loan Document or any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder; (f) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section, to (i) any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement, (ii) any actual or prospective party (or its Related Parties) to any swap, derivative or other transaction under which payments are to be made by reference to the Borrower and its obligations, this Agreement or payments hereunder or (iii) any credit insurance provider relating to the Borrower and its obligations; (g) on a confidential basis to (i) any rating agency in connection with rating the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or this Agreement or (ii) the CUSIP Service Bureau or any similar agency in connection with the issuance and monitoring of CUSIP numbers with respect to this Agreement; (h) with the consent of the Borrower; or (i) to the extent such Confidential Information (x) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section, or (y) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Lender, and LC Issuing Bank or any of their respective Affiliates on a nonconfidential basis from a source other than the Borrower. In addition, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders may disclose the existence of this Agreement and information about this Agreement to market data collectors, similar service providers to the lending industry and service providers to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders in connection with the administration of this Agreement, the other Loan Documents and the Commitments. Any Person required to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information as provided in this Section shall be considered to have complied with its obligation to do so if such Person has exercised the same degree of care to maintain the confidentiality of such Confidential Information as such Person would accord to its own confidential information.
SECTION 8.09. Governing Law.
  
THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SECTION 8.10. Severability; Survival.
 
(a) In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement should be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.
  
(b) All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made by the Borrower herein and in the certificates or other instruments delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered to have been relied upon by the other parties hereto and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the making of any Advances and issuance of any Letters of Credit, regardless of any investigation made by any such other party or on its behalf and notwithstanding that the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks or any Lender may have had notice or knowledge of any Default or incorrect representation or warranty at the time any credit is extended hereunder, and shall continue in full force and effect as long as the principal of or any accrued interest on any Advance or any fee or any other amount payable under this Agreement is outstanding and unpaid or any Letter of Credit is outstanding and so long as the Commitments have not expired or terminated.
    


68

SECTION 8.11. Execution in Counterparts.
  
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement by fax shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement.
SECTION 8.12. Jurisdiction, Etc.
  
(a)    EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IREEVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS, FOR ITSELF AND ITS PROPERTY, TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY NEW YORK STATE COURT OR FEDERAL COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SITTING IN NEW YORK CITY, THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, AND ANY APPELATE COURT FROM ANY THEREOF, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR FOR RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY SUCH NEW YORK STATE COURT OR, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, IN SUCH FEDERAL COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT SHALL AFFECT ANY RIGHT THAT ANY PARTY MAY OTHERWISE HAVE TO BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT IN THE COURTS OF ANY JURISDICTION.
  
(b)    EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT IT MAY LEGALLY AND EFFECTIVELY DO SO, ANY OBJECTION THAT IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT IN ANY NEW YORK STATE OR FEDERAL COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY SUCH COURT.

SECTION 8.13. Waiver of Jury Trial.

EACH OF THE BORROWER, THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, EACH LC ISSUING BANK AND EACH LENDER HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ACTIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ANY LC


69

ISSUING BANK, THE BORROWER OR ANY LENDER IN THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION, PERFORMANCE OR ENFORCEMENT THEREOF.
SECTION 8.14. USA Patriot Act.

Each of the Lenders and the LC Issuing Banks hereby notifies the Borrower that pursuant to the requirements of the USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law as of October 26, 2001)) (as amended, restated, modified or otherwise supplemented from time to time, the “ Patriot Act ”), it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrower, which information includes the name and address of the Borrower and other information that will allow such Lender or LC Issuing Bank, as the case may be, to identify the Borrower in accordance with the Patriot Act.
SECTION 8.15. No Fiduciary Duty.

Each of the Administrative Agent, each Lender and each of their respective Affiliates and their officers, directors, controlling persons, employees, agents and advisors (collectively, solely for purposes of this Section 8.15, the “Lenders”) may have economic interests that conflict with those of the Borrower.  The Borrower agrees that nothing in the Loan Documents or otherwise will be deemed to create an advisory, fiduciary or agency relationship or fiduciary or other implied duty between the Lenders and the Borrower, its stockholders or its Affiliates.  The Borrower acknowledges and agrees that (i) the transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents are arm’s-length commercial transactions between the Lenders, on the one hand, and the Borrower, on the other, (ii) in connection therewith and with the process leading to such transaction each of the Lenders is acting solely as a principal and not the agent or fiduciary of the Borrower, its management, stockholders, creditors or any other person, (iii) no Lender has assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Borrower with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether any Lender or any of its Affiliates has advised or is currently advising the Borrower on other matters) or any other obligation to the Borrower except the obligations expressly set forth in the Loan Documents and (iv) the Borrower has consulted its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate.  The Borrower further acknowledges and agrees that it is responsible for making its own independent judgment with respect to such transactions and the process leading thereto.  The Borrower agrees that it will not claim that any Lender has rendered advisory services of any nature or respect, or owes a fiduciary or similar duty to the Borrower, in connection with such transaction or the process leading thereto.
SECTION 8.16. Defaulting Lenders.

(a)     Defaulting Lender Adjustments . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if any Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, then, until such time as such Lender is no longer a Defaulting Lender, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law:

(i) Waivers and Amendments . Such Defaulting Lender’s right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent with respect to this Agreement shall be restricted as set forth in the definition of Required Lenders and in Section 8.01.



70

(ii) Defaulting Lender Waterfall . Any payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts received by the Administrative Agent for the account of such Defaulting Lender (whether voluntary or mandatory, at maturity, pursuant to Article VI or otherwise) or received by the Administrative Agent from a Defaulting Lender pursuant to Section 8.05 shall be applied at such time or times as may be determined by the Administrative Agent as follows: first , to the payment of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to the Administrative Agent hereunder; second , to the payment on a pro rata basis of any amounts owing by such Defaulting Lender to any LC Issuing Bank hereunder; third , to Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender in accordance with Section 8.17; fourth , as the Borrower may request (so long as no Default exists), to the funding of any Advance in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has failed to fund its portion thereof as required by this Agreement, as determined by the Administrative Agent; fifth , if so determined by the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to be held in a deposit account and released pro rata in order to (x) satisfy such Defaulting Lender’s potential future funding obligations with respect to Advances under this Agreement and (y) Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ future Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender with respect to future Letters of Credit issued under this Agreement, in accordance with Section 8.17; sixth , to the payment of any amounts owing to the Lenders or the LC Issuing Banks as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by any Lender or the LC Issuing Banks against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender’s breach of its obligations under this Agreement; seventh , so long as no Default exists, to the payment of any amounts owing to the Borrower as a result of any judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction obtained by the Borrower against such Defaulting Lender as a result of such Defaulting Lender's breach of its obligations under this Agreement; and eighth , to such Defaulting Lender or as otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction; provided that, if (x) such payment is a payment of the principal amount of any Advances or LC Outstandings in respect of which such Defaulting Lender has not fully funded its appropriate share, and (y) such Advances were made or the related Letters of Credit were issued at a time when the conditions set forth in Section 3.02 were satisfied or waived, such payment shall be applied solely to pay the Advances of, and LC Outstandings owed to, all Non-Defaulting Lenders on a pro rata basis prior to being applied to the payment of any Advances of, or LC Outstandings owed to, such Defaulting Lender until such time as all Advances and funded and unfunded participations in LC Outstandings are held by the Lenders pro rata in accordance with the Commitments without giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv). Any payments, prepayments or other amounts paid or payable to a Defaulting Lender that are applied (or held) to pay amounts owed by a Defaulting Lender or to post Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 8.16(a)(ii) shall be deemed paid to and redirected by such Defaulting Lender, and each Lender irrevocably consents hereto.

(iii) Certain Fees . (A) No Defaulting Lender shall be entitled to receive any commitment fee pursuant to Section 2.05(a) for any period during which that Lender is a Defaulting Lender (and the Borrower shall not be required to pay any such fee that otherwise would have been required to have been paid to that Defaulting Lender).
  


71

(B)      Each Defaulting Lender shall be entitled to receive LC Fees for any period during which that Lender is a Defaulting Lender only to the extent allocable to its Commitment Percentage of the stated amount of Letters of Credit for which it has provided Cash Collateral pursuant to Section 8.17.

(C)      With respect to any LC Fee not required to be paid to any Defaulting Lender pursuant to clause (B) above, the Borrower shall (x) pay to each Non-Defaulting Lender that portion of any such LC Fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Lender with respect to such Defaulting Lender’s participation in LC Outstandings that has been reallocated to such Non-Defaulting Lender pursuant to clause (iv) below, (y) pay to each LC Issuing Bank the amount of any such LC Fee otherwise payable to such Defaulting Lender to the extent allocable to such LC Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure to such Defaulting Lender, and (z) not be required to pay the remaining amount of any such LC Fee.

(iv) Reallocation of Participations to Reduce Fronting Exposure . All or any part of such Defaulting Lender’s participation in LC Outstandings shall be reallocated among the Non-Defaulting Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitment Percentages (calculated without regard to such Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) but only to the extent that (x) such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits of any Non-Defaulting Lender to exceed such Non-Defaulting Lender’s Commitment and (y) such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Outstanding Credits to exceed the aggregate Commitments. No reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Lender arising from that Lender having become a Defaulting Lender, including any claim of a Non-Defaulting Lender as a result of such Non-Defaulting Lender’s increased exposure following such reallocation.

(v) Cash Collateral . If the reallocation described in clause (iv) above cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrower shall, without prejudice to any right or remedy available to it hereunder or under law, Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 8.17.

(vi) Reduction of Available Commitments . The Borrower may terminate the Available Commitment of any Lender that is a Defaulting Lender upon not less than three Business Days’ prior notice to the Administrative Agent (which shall promptly notify the Lenders thereof), and in such event the provisions of Section 8.16(a)(ii) will apply to all amounts thereafter paid by the Borrower for the account of such Defaulting Lender under this Agreement (whether on account of principal, interest, fees, indemnity or other amounts); provided that (i) no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and (ii) such termination shall not be deemed to be a waiver or release of any claim the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any LC Issuing Bank, or any Lender may have against such Defaulting Lender.


72

(b)     Defaulting Lender Cure . If the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, and each LC Issuing Bank agree in writing that a Lender is no longer a Defaulting Lender, the Administrative Agent will so notify the parties hereto, whereupon as of the effective date specified in such notice and subject to any conditions set forth therein (which may include arrangements with respect to any Cash Collateral), that Lender will, to the extent applicable, purchase at par that portion of outstanding Advances of the other Lenders or take such other actions as the Administrative Agent may determine to be necessary to cause the Advances and funded and unfunded participations in LC Outstandings to be held pro rata by the Lenders in accordance with the Commitments (without giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv)), whereupon such Lender will cease to be a Defaulting Lender; provided that no adjustments will be made retroactively with respect to fees accrued or payments made by or on behalf of the Borrower while that Lender was a Defaulting Lender; and provided , further , that except to the extent otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the affected parties, no change hereunder from Defaulting Lender to Lender will constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder arising from that Lender’s having been a Defaulting Lender.

(c) New Letters of Credit . So long as any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, no LC Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, extend, renew or increase any Letter of Credit unless it is satisfied that it will have no Fronting Exposure after giving effect thereto.

(d) Bankruptcy Event of a Parent Company . If (i) a Bankruptcy Event with respect to a Parent of any Lender shall occur following the date hereof and for so long as such event shall continue or (ii) any LC Issuing Bank has a good faith belief that any Lender has defaulted in fulfilling its obligations under one or more other agreements in which such Lender commits to extend credit, no LC Issuing Bank shall be required to issue, amend or increase any Letter of Credit, unless the LC Issuing Bank shall have entered into arrangements with the Borrower or such Lender, satisfactory to such LC Issuing Bank to defease any risk to it in respect of such Lender hereunder.

SECTION 8.17. Cash Collateral

At any time that there shall exist a Defaulting Lender, within one Business Day following the written request of the Administrative Agent or any LC Issuing Bank (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) the Borrower shall Cash Collateralize the LC Issuing Banks’ Fronting Exposure with respect to such Defaulting Lender (determined after giving effect to Section 8.16(a)(iv) and any Cash Collateral provided by such Defaulting Lender) in an amount not less than the Minimum Collateral Amount.
(i) Grant of Security Interest . The Borrower, and to the extent provided by any Defaulting Lender, such Defaulting Lender, hereby grants to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the LC Issuing Banks, and agrees to maintain, a first priority security interest in all such Cash Collateral as security for the Defaulting Lenders’ obligation to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings, to be applied pursuant to paragraph (ii) below. If at any time the Administrative Agent determines that Cash Collateral is subject to any right or claim of any Person other than the Administrative Agent and the LC Issuing Banks as herein provided, or that the total amount of such Cash Collateral is less than the Minimum Collateral Amount, the Borrower will, promptly


73

upon demand by the Administrative Agent, pay or provide to the Administrative Agent additional Cash Collateral in an amount sufficient to eliminate such deficiency (after giving effect to any Cash Collateral provided by the Defaulting Lender).

(ii) Application . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Cash Collateral provided under this Section 8.17 or Section 8.16 in respect of Letters of Credit shall be applied to the satisfaction of the Defaulting Lender’s obligation to fund participations in respect of LC Outstandings (including, as to Cash Collateral provided by a Defaulting Lender, any interest accrued on such obligation) for which the Cash Collateral was so provided, prior to any other application of such property as may otherwise be provided for herein.

(iii) Termination of Requirement . Cash Collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce any LC Issuing Bank’s Fronting Exposure shall no longer be required to be held as Cash Collateral pursuant to this Section 8.17 following (i) the elimination of the applicable Fronting Exposure (including by the termination of Defaulting Lender status of the applicable Lender), or (ii) the determination by the Administrative Agent and each LC Issuing Bank that there exists excess Cash Collateral; provided that, subject to Section 8.16, the Person providing Cash Collateral and each LC Issuing Bank may agree that Cash Collateral shall be held to support future anticipated Fronting Exposure or other obligations.

SECTION 8.18. Reallocations.

The Administrative Agent, the Borrower and each Lender agree that upon the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date, the amount of such Lender’s Commitment is as set forth on Schedule I hereto. Simultaneously with the effectiveness of this Agreement on the Restatement Effective Date, the Commitments of each of the Lenders, the outstanding amount of all Advances and the participations of the Lenders in outstanding Letters of Credit shall be reallocated among the Lenders in accordance with their respective Commitment Percentages (determined in accordance with the amount of each Lender’s Commitment set forth on Schedule I hereto), and in order to effect such reallocations, each Lender whose Commitment is in an amount that exceeds the amount of its “Commitment” under the Existing Credit Agreement (each an “ Assignee Lender ”) shall be deemed to have purchased all right, title and interest in, and all obligations in respect of, the Commitments of the Lenders whose Commitments are less than their respective “Commitments” under the Existing Credit Agreement (each an “ Assignor Lender ”), so that the Commitments of each Lender will be as set forth on Schedule I hereto. Such purchases shall be deemed to have been effected by way of, and subject to the terms and conditions of, Assignment and Assumptions without the payment of any related assignment fee, and, except for any requested replacement promissory notes to be provided to the Assignor Lenders and Assignee Lenders in the principal amounts of their respective Commitments, no other documents or instruments shall be, or shall be required to be, executed in connection with such assignments (all of which are hereby waived). The Assignor Lenders and Assignee Lenders shall make such cash settlements among themselves, through the Administrative Agent, as the Administrative Agent may direct (after giving effect to any netting effected by the Administrative Agent) with respect to such reallocations and assignments.


74

SECTION 8.19. Amendment and Restatement of Existing Credit Agreement. This Agreement continues in effect the Existing Credit Agreement, and the Existing Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety by the terms and provisions of this Agreement, which shall supersede all terms and provisions of the Existing Credit Agreement effective from and after the Restatement Effective Date. This Agreement is not intended to, and shall not, constitute a novation of any indebtedness or other obligations owing by the Borrower under the Existing Credit Agreement or a waiver or release of any indebtedness or other obligations owing, or any “Defaults” or “Events of Default” (each as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) existing, under the Existing Credit Agreement based on any facts or events occurring or existing at or prior to the execution and delivery of this Agreement. On the Restatement Effective Date, the credit facilities described in the Existing Credit Agreement shall be amended, supplemented, modified and restated in their entirety by the credit facilities described herein, and all “Outstanding Credits” (as defined in the Existing Credit Agreement) of the Borrower that are not being paid on such date and remain outstanding as of such date under the Existing Credit Agreement, shall be deemed to be Outstanding Credits under the corresponding facilities described herein, without further action by any Person, except as provided in Section 8.18.


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]




S-1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused a counterpart of this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

 
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
 
COMPANY, INC.
 
as Borrower
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Julia A. Sloat
 
Name:
Julia A. Sloat
 
Title:
Treasurer





AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-2

 
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
 
as Administrative Agent, an LC Issuing Bank and a
 
Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Bridget Killackey
 
Name:
Bridget Killackey
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-3

 
THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Emily Freedman
 
Name:
Emily Freedman
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-4

 
CITIBANK, N.A.
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Amit Vasani
 
Name:
Amit Vasani
 
Title:
Vice President






AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-5

 
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as an LC Issuing Bank and a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Sherrie I. Manson
 
Name:
Sherrie I. Manson
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-6

 
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Ann E. Sutton
 
Name:
Ann E. Sutton
 
Title:
Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-7

 
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS
 
BRANCH
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Spaight
 
Name:
Michael Spaight
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Remy Riester
 
Name:
Remy Riester
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-8

 
THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Chi-Cheng Chen
 
Name:
Chi-Cheng Chen
 
Title:
Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-9

 
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
 
ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Nick Brokke
 
Name:
Nick Brokke
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-10

 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jerry Wells
 
Name:
Jerry Wells
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-11

 
BNP PARIBAS
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Denis O'Meara
 
Name:
Denis O'Meara
 
Title:
Managing Director
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Roberto Impeduglia
 
Name:
Roberto Impeduglia
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-12

 
CREDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND
 
INVESTMENT BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Darrell Stanley
 
Name:
Darrell Stanley
 
Title:
Managing Director
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Willis
 
Name:
Michael Willis
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-13

 
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Rebecca Kratz
 
Name:
Rebecca Kratz
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-14

 
MIZUHO CORPORATE BANK, LTD.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Leon Mo
 
Name:
Leon Mo
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-15

 
MORGAN STANLEY BANK, N.A.
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael King
 
Name:
Michael King
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-16

 
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Frank Lambrinos
 
Name:
Frank Lambrinos
 
Title:
Authorized Signatory

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-17

 
SUNTRUST BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Andrew Johnson
 
Name:
Andrew Johnson
 
Title:
Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-18

 
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Hussam S. Alsahlani
 
Name:
Hussam S. Alsahlani
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-19

 
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Thane Rattew
 
Name:
Thane Rattew
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-20

 
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Eric J. Cosgrove
 
Name:
Eric J. Cosgrove
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-21

 
USB AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Lana Gifas
 
Name:
Lana Gifas
 
Title:
Director
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jennifer Anderson
 
Name:
Jennifer Anderson
 
Title:
Associate Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-22

 
COMPASS BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael Dixon
 
Name:
Michael Dixon
 
Title:
Sr. Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-23

 
FIFTH THIRD BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Michael J. Schaltz, Jr.
 
Name:
Michael J. Schaltz, Jr.
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-24

 
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Thomas E. Redmond
 
Name:
Thomas E. Redmond
 
Title:
Senior Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-25

 
SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING
 
CORPORATION
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ James D. Weinstein
 
Name:
James D. Weinstein
 
Title:
Managing Director

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-26

 
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Dan Swanson
 
Name:
Dan Swanson
 
Title:
Staff Officer

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

S-27

 
THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
 
as a Lender
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ John D. Lejto
 
Name:
John D. Lejto
 
Title:
Vice President

AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT A
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF NOTICE OF BORROWING
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders party
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
[Date]
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, American Electric Power Company, Inc., refers to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended or modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for said Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests a Borrowing under the Credit Agreement, and in that connection sets forth below the information relating to such Borrowing (the “ Proposed Borrowing ”) as required by Section 2.02(a) of the Credit Agreement:
(i)    The Business Day of the Proposed Borrowing is __________________, 20__.
(ii)    [The Type of Advances comprising the Proposed Borrowing is [Base Rate Advances][Eurodollar Rate Advances].]
(iii)    The aggregate amount of the Proposed Borrowing is $___________________.
[(iv)    The initial Interest Period for each Eurodollar Rate Advance made as part of the Proposed Borrowing is [[one][two][three][six] month[s]] [OTHER PERIOD OF LESS THAN ONE MONTH AGREED TO BY ALL LENDERS].]
The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the Proposed Borrowing:
(A)    the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.01 of the Credit Agreement (other than Section 4.01(e) and the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, before and after giving


A-2

effect to the Proposed Borrowing and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on the date hereof; and
(B)    no event has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the Proposed Borrowing or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.
Very truly yours,
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
By:_________________________________________    
Name:
Title:
        

    



EXHIBIT A
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT B
(to the Credit Agreement)

FORM OF REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE


JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for the Lenders party
to the Credit Agreement
referred to below
Attention: Bank Loan Syndications
[     ], as LC Issuing Bank
[Date]

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned, American Electric Power Company, Inc., refers to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended or modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the undersigned, the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for said Lenders and LC Issuing Banks, and hereby gives you notice pursuant to Section 2.04(b) of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests the issuance of a Letter of Credit (the “ Requested Letter of Credit ”) in accordance with the following terms:
(i)    the LC Issuing Bank is _____________;

(ii)    the requested date of [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit (which is a Business Day) is _____________;

(iii)    the expiration date of the Requested Letter of Credit requested hereby is ___________; Date may not be more than one year after the date specified in clause (ii). .1  

(iv)    the proposed stated amount of the Requested Letter of Credit is _______________; Must be minimum of $100,000. .2  

(v)    the beneficiary of the Requested Letter of Credit is _____________, with an address at ______________; and

(vi) the conditions under which a drawing may be made under the Requested Letter of Credit are as follows: ___________________; and

____________________________

1 Date may not be more than one year after the date specified in clause (ii).
2 Must be minimum of $100,000.


B-2

(vii)    any other additional conditions are as follows: ___________________.

The undersigned hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the date of the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit:
(A)    the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.01 of the Credit (other than Section 4.01 (e) and the last sentence of Section 4.01(f)) are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, before and after giving effect to the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, as though made on and as of the date hereof; and
(B)    no event has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the [issuance] [extension] [modification] [amendment] of the Requested Letter of Credit or from the application of the proceeds therefrom, that constitutes a Default.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
INC.

By:_________________________________________        
Name:
Title:







EXHIBIT B
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT C
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
This Assignment and Assumption (the “ Assignment and Assumption ”) is dated as of the Effective Date set forth below and is entered into by and between [the][each] 1 Assignor identified in item 1 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignor ”) and [the][each] 2 Assignee identified in item 2 below ([the][each, an] “ Assignee ”). [It is understood and agreed that the rights and obligations of [the Assignors][the Assignees] 3 hereunder are several and not joint.] 4 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement identified below (as amended, the “ Credit Agreement ”), receipt of a copy of which is hereby acknowledged by [the][each] Assignee. The Standard Terms and Conditions set forth in Annex 1 attached hereto are hereby agreed to and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Assignment and Assumption as if set forth herein in full.

For an agreed consideration, [the][each] Assignor hereby irrevocably sells and assigns to [the Assignee][the respective Assignees], and [the][each] Assignee hereby irrevocably purchases and assumes from [the Assignor][the respective Assignors], subject to and in accordance with the Standard Terms and Conditions and the Credit Agreement, as of the Effective Date inserted by the Administrative Agent as contemplated below (i) all of [the Assignor’s][the respective Assignors’] rights and obligations in [its capacity as a Lender][their respective capacities as Lenders] under the Credit Agreement and any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto to the extent related to the amount and percentage interest identified below of all of such outstanding rights and obligations of [the Assignor][the respective Assignors] under the Credit Agreement, and (ii) to the extent permitted to be assigned under applicable law, all claims, suits, causes of action and any other right of [the Assignor (in its capacity as a Lender)][the respective Assignors (in their respective capacities as Lenders)] against any Person, whether known or unknown, arising under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, any other documents or instruments delivered pursuant thereto or the loan transactions governed thereby or in any way based on or related to any of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, contract claims, tort claims, malpractice claims, statutory claims and all other claims at law or in equity related to the rights and obligations sold and assigned pursuant to clause (i) above (the rights and obligations sold and assigned by [the][any] Assignor to [the][any] Assignee pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above being referred to herein collectively as [the][an] “ Assigned Interest ”). Each such sale and assignment is without recourse to [the][any] Assignor and, except as expressly provided in this Assignment and Assumption, without representation or warranty by [the][any] Assignor.

 
 
 
 
 
1
For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignor(s), if the assignment is from a single Assignor, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is from multiple Assignors, choose the second bracketed language.  
2
For bracketed language here and elsewhere in this form relating to the Assignee(s), if the assignment is to a single Assignee, choose the first bracketed language. If the assignment is to multiple Assignees, choose the second bracketed language.
3
Select as appropriate.
4
Include bracketed language if there are either multiple Assignors or multiple Assignees.   


C-2

1.
 Assignor[s]:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.
Assignee[s]:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[Assignee is an [Affiliate][Approved Fund] of [ identify Lender ]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.
Borrower(s):
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
4.
Administrative Agent:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement
5.
Credit Agreement:
The $1,750,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2014 among American Electric Power Company, Inc., as the Borrower, the Lenders parties thereto, the LC Issuing Banks parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent

6.
Assigned Interest[s]:
Assignor[s]
5  
Assignee[s]
6  
Aggregate Amount of
Commitment/Advances for all
Lenders 7
Amount of
Commitment/Advances Assigned 8
Percentage
 Assigned of Commitment/Advances
8  
CUSIP Number
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 
 
 
$
$
%
 

[7.      Trade Date:          ______________] 9  
[Page break]

 
 
 
 
 
5
List each Assignor, as appropriate.
6
List each Assignee, as appropriate.
7
Amount to be adjusted by the counterparties to take into account any payments or prepayments made between the Trade Date and the Effective Date.
8
Set forth, to at least 9 decimals, as a percentage of the Commitment/Advances of all Lenders thereunder.
9
To be completed if the Assignor and the Assignee(s) intend that the minimum assignment amount is to be determined as of the Trade Date.

EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-3

Effective Date: _____________ ___, 20___ [TO BE INSERTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND WHICH SHALL BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF RECORDATION OF TRANSFER IN THE REGISTER THEREFOR.]
The terms set forth in this Assignment and Assumption are hereby agreed to:

ASSIGNOR[S] 10     

[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]


By:
____________________________
Title:


[NAME OF ASSIGNOR]


By:
____________________________
Title:

ASSIGNEE[S] 11     

[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]


By:
_____________________________
Title:

[NAME OF ASSIGNEE]


By:
_____________________________
Title:


 
 
 
 
 
10
Add additional signature blocks as needed.
11
Add additional signature blocks as needed.


EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-4

[Consented to and] 12 Accepted:

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as
Administrative Agent


By:     _____________________________    
Title:


Consented to:

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     _____________________________    
Title:


CITIBANK, N.A., as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     _____________________________    
Title:


KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     _____________________________    
Title:


THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, as
an LC Issuing Bank


By:     _____________________________    
Title:


 
 
 
 
 
12
To be added only if the consent of the Administrative Agent is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.  

EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-5

[Consented to:  

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CCOMPANY, INC.

By:     ______________________        
Title:] 13  












































 
 
 
 
 
13
To be added only if the consent of the Borrower is required by the terms of the Credit Agreement.

EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


ANNEX 1
$1,750,000,000 Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2014 among American Electric Power Company, Inc., as the Borrower, the Lenders parties thereto, the LC Issuing Banks parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION

1.
Representations and Warranties .
1.1.
Assignor[s] . [The][Each] Assignor (a) represents and warrants that (i) it is the legal and beneficial owner of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, (ii) [the][such] Assigned Interest is free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other adverse claim, (iii) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and (iv) it is [not] a Defaulting Lender; and (b) assumes no responsibility with respect to (i) any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, (ii) the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Loan Documents or any collateral thereunder, (iii) the financial condition of the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person obligated in respect of any Loan Document or (iv) the performance or observance by the Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any other Person of any of their respective obligations under any Loan Document.
1.2.
Assignee[s] . [The][Each] Assignee (a) represents and warrants that (i) it has full power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute and deliver this Assignment and Assumption and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to become a Lender under the Credit Agreement, (ii) it meets all the requirements to be an assignee under Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement (subject to such consents, if any, as may be required thereunder), (iii) from and after the Effective Date, it shall be bound by the provisions of the Credit Agreement as a Lender thereunder and, to the extent of [the][the relevant] Assigned Interest, shall have the obligations of a Lender thereunder, (iv) it is sophisticated with respect to decisions to acquire assets of the type represented by the Assigned Interest and either it, or the Person exercising discretion in making its decision to acquire the Assigned Interest, is experienced in acquiring assets of such type, (v) it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, and has received or has been accorded the opportunity to receive copies of the most recent financial statements delivered pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 5.01(i) thereof, as applicable, and such other documents and information as it deems appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, (vi) it has, independently and without reliance upon the Administrative Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this

EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

C-A1-2

Assignment and Assumption and to purchase [the][such] Assigned Interest, and (vii) attached to the Assignment and Assumption is any documentation required to be delivered by it pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, duly completed and executed by [the][such] Assignee; (b) agrees that (i) it will, independently and without reliance on the Administrative Agent, [the][any] Assignor or any other Lender, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Loan Documents, and (ii) it will perform in accordance with their terms all of the obligations which by the terms of the Loan Documents are required to be performed by it as a Lender and (c) appoints and authorizes the Administrative Agent to take such action as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under the Credit Agreement as are delegated to the Administrative Agent by the terms thereof, together with such powers and discretion as are reasonably incidental thereto.
2.
Payments . From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [the][each] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [the][the relevant] Assignee whether such amounts have accrued prior to, on or after the Effective Date. The Assignor[s] and the Assignee[s] shall make all appropriate adjustments in payments by the Administrative Agent for periods prior to the Effective Date or with respect to the making of this assignment directly between themselves. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments of interest, fees or other amounts paid or payable in kind from and after the Effective Date to [the][the relevant] Assignee.
3.
General Provisions . This Assignment and Assumption shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Assignment and Assumption may be executed in any number of counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Assignment and Assumption by fax shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Assignment and Assumption. This Assignment and Assumption shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.









EXHIBIT C
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT D
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE BORROWER
To each of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks party to the
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to below
and to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent thereunder

November 10, 2014

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This opinion is furnished to you pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(iii) of the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (the “ Credit Agreement ”) among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

I am an Associate General Counsel for American Electric Power Service Corporation, an affiliate of the Borrower, and have acted as counsel to the Borrower in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement. I am generally familiar with the Borrower’s corporate history, properties, operations and charter (including amendments, restatements and supplements thereto).

In connection with this opinion, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have examined:

(1)
The Credit Agreement.

(2)
The documents furnished by the Borrower pursuant to Article III of the Credit Agreement .

(3)
The certificate of incorporation of the Borrower and all amendments thereto.

(4)
The by-laws of the Borrower and all amendments thereto.

(5)
A certificate of the Secretary of State of New York, dated November 7, 2014, attesting to the continued existence and good standing of the Borrower in that State.

In addition, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have examined the originals, or copies certified to my satisfaction, of such other corporate records of the Borrower, certificates of public officials and of officers of the Borrower, and agreements, instruments and other documents, as I have deemed necessary as a basis for the opinions expressed below.


D-2

In my examination, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity with the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. In making our examination of documents and instruments executed or to be executed by persons other than the Borrower, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have assumed that each such other person had the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform fully its obligations thereunder, the due authorization by each such other person for the execution, delivery and performance thereof and the due execution and delivery thereof by or on behalf of such person of each such document and instrument. In the case of any such person that is not a natural person, I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have also assumed, insofar as it is relevant to the opinions set forth below, that each such other person is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was created and is duly qualified and in good standing in each other jurisdiction where the failure to be so qualified could reasonably be expected to have a material effect upon its ability to execute, deliver and/or perform its obligations under any such document or instrument. I, or attorneys over whom I exercise supervision, have further assumed that each document, instrument, agreement, record and certificate reviewed by us for purposes of rendering the opinions expressed below has not been amended by any oral agreement, conduct or course of dealing between the parties thereto.
As to questions of fact material to the opinions expressed herein, I have relied upon certificates and representations of officers of the Borrower (including but not limited to those contained in the Credit Agreement and certificates delivered upon the execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement) and of appropriate public officials, without independent verification of such matters except as otherwise described herein.
Whenever my opinions herein with respect to the existence or absence of facts are stated to be to my knowledge or awareness, it is intended to signify that no information has come to my attention or the attention of other counsel working under my direction in connection with the preparation of this opinion letter that would give me or them actual knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts. However, except to the extent expressly set forth herein, neither I nor they have undertaken any independent investigation to determine the existence or absence of such facts, and no inference as to my or their knowledge of the existence or absence of such facts should be assumed.
I am a member of the Bar of the States of New York and Ohio and do not purport to be expert on the laws of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the States of New York and Ohio and the Federal laws of the United States. My opinions expressed below are limited to the law of the States of New York and Ohio and the Federal law of the United States.

Based upon the foregoing and upon such investigation as I have deemed necessary, and subject to the limitations, qualifications and assumptions set forth herein, I am of the following opinion:

1.
The Borrower (a) is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of New York; (b) has the corporate power and authority, and the legal right, to own and operate its property, to lease the property which it operates as lessee and to conduct the business in which it is


D-3

currently engaged and in which it proposes to be engaged after the date hereof; (c) is duly qualified as a foreign corporation and is in good standing under the laws of each jurisdiction where its ownership, lease or operation of property or the conduct of its business requires such qualification, except any such jurisdiction where the failure to so qualify could not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change; (d) owns or possesses all material licenses and permits necessary for the operation by it of its business as currently conducted; and (e) is in compliance with all Requirements of Law, except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents referenced in Section 4.01(e) of the Credit Agreement or to the extent that the failure to comply therewith could not, in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The term “Requirements of Law” means the laws of the State of Ohio and the laws, rules and regulations of the United States of America (including, without limitation, ERISA and Environmental Laws) and orders of any governmental authority applicable to the Borrower.

2.
The Borrower has the corporate power and authority, and the legal right, to execute and deliver the Credit Agreement and to perform under, and to borrow under, the Credit Agreement. The Borrower has taken all necessary corporate action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Credit Agreement and the incurrence of Advances on the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, and the Credit Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower.

3.
The execution, delivery and performance of the Credit Agreement and the Advances made thereunder will not violate any Requirements of Law, the Borrower’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws, or any material contractual restriction binding on or affecting the Borrower or any of its properties.

4.
No approval or authorization or other action by, and notice to or filing with, any governmental agency or regulatory body or other third person is required in connection with the due execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement and the performance, validity or enforceability of the Credit Agreement.

5.
Except as described in Section 4.01(e) of the Credit Agreement, no action, suit, investigation, litigation, or proceeding, including, without limitation, any Environmental Action, affecting the Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries before any court, government agency or arbitrator is pending or, to my knowledge, threatened, that is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.

6.
Neither the Borrower nor any of its Significant Subsidiaries is an “investment company”, or an “affiliated person” of, or “promoter” or “principal underwriter” for, an “investment company”, as such terms are defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither the making of any Advances, the application of the proceeds or repayment thereof by the Borrower nor the


D-4

consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement will violate any provision of such Act or any rule, regulation or order of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

7.
In any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Credit Agreement in any court of the State of Ohio or in any Federal court sitting in the State of Ohio, such court would recognize and give effect to the provisions of Section 8.09 of the Credit Agreement, wherein the parties thereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. However, if a court of the State of Ohio or a Federal court sitting in the State of Ohio were to hold that the Credit Agreement is governed by, and to be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Ohio, the Credit Agreement would be, under the State of Ohio, the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
The opinion set forth above in the last sentence of paragraph 7 above is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditor’s rights generally and to general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.)

I express no opinion as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement; (ii) the effect of the law of any jurisdiction (other than the State of Ohio) wherein any Lender may be located which limits the rates of interest which may be charged or collected by such Lender; and (iii) whether a Federal or state court outside of the States of New York or Ohio would give effect to the choice of New York law provided for in the Credit Agreement.

This opinion has been rendered solely for your benefit in connection with the Credit Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and may not be used, circulated, quoted, relied upon or otherwise referred to by any other Person (other than your respective counsel, auditors and any regulatory agency having jurisdiction over you or as otherwise required pursuant to legal process or other requirements of law) for any other purpose without my prior written consent; provided that, (i) King & Spalding LLP, special counsel for the Administrative Agent, may rely on the opinions expressed in this opinion letter in connection with the opinion to be furnished by them in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement and (ii) any Person that becomes a Lender or an LC Issuing Bank after the date hereof may rely on the opinions expressed in this opinion letter as though addressed to such Person. I undertake no responsibility to update or supplement this opinion in response to changes in law or future events or circumstances.

Very truly yours,



Thomas G. Berkemeyer



EXHIBIT E
(to the Credit Agreement)
FORM OF OPINION OF COUNSEL
FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
[DATE]
To each of the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks party to the
Credit Agreement referred to below
and to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special New York counsel to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., individually and as Administrative Agent, in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders, the LC Issuing Banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. This opinion is furnished to you pursuant to Section 3.01(a)(iv) of the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.
In that connection, we have examined the following documents:
(1)      Counterparts of the Credit Agreement, executed by the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Lenders; and
(2)      The other documents furnished by the Borrower pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Credit Agreement, including (without limitation) the opinion of Thomas G. Berkemeyer, Associate General Counsel for American Electric Power Service Corporation, an affiliate of the Borrower (the “ Opinion ”).
In our examination of the documents referred to above, we have assumed the authenticity of all such documents submitted to us as originals, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authority of the parties executing such documents and the conformity to the originals of all such documents submitted to us as copies. We have assumed that you independently evaluated, and are satisfied with, the creditworthiness of the Borrower and the business terms reflected in the Credit Agreement. We have also assumed that each of the Lenders, the LC Issuing Banks, and the Administrative Agent has duly executed and delivered, with all necessary power and authority (corporate and otherwise), the Credit Agreement.


E-2

To the extent that our opinions expressed below involve conclusions as to matters governed by law other than the law of the State of New York, we have relied upon the Opinion and have assumed without independent investigation the correctness of the matters set forth therein, our opinions expressed below being subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the Opinion. We note that we do not represent the Borrower and, accordingly, are not privy to the nature or character of its businesses. Accordingly, we have also assumed that the Borrower is subject only to statutes, rules, regulations, judgments, orders, and other requirements of law of general applicability to corporations doing business in the State of New York. As to matters of fact, we have relied solely upon the documents we have examined.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications set forth below, we are of the opinion that:
(i)      The Credit Agreement is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms.
(ii)      While we have not independently considered the matters covered by the Opinion to the extent necessary to enable us to express the conclusions stated therein, the Opinion and the other documents referred to in item (2) above are substantially responsive to the corresponding requirements set forth in Section 3.01 of the Credit Agreement pursuant to which the same have been delivered.
Our opinions are subject to the following qualifications:
(a) Our opinion in paragraph (i) above is subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors’ rights generally.

(b) Our opinion in paragraph (i) above is subject to the effect of general principles of equity, including (without limitation) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). Such principles of equity are of general obligation, and, in applying such principles, a court, among other things, might not allow a contracting party to exercise remedies in respect of a default deemed immaterial, or might decline to order an obligor to perform covenants.

(c) We note further that, in addition to the application of equitable principles described above, courts have imposed an obligation on contracting parties to act reasonably and in good faith in the exercise of their contractual rights and remedies, and may also apply public policy considerations in limiting the right of parties seeking to obtain indemnification under circumstances where the conduct of such parties in the circumstances in question is determined to have constituted negligence.

(d) We express no opinion herein as to (i) Section 8.05 of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the enforceability of provisions purporting to grant to a party conclusive rights of determination, (iii) the availability of specific performance or other equitable remedies, (iv) the enforceability of rights to indemnity under Federal or state securities laws and (v) the enforceability of waivers by parties of their respective rights and remedies under law.


E-3

(e) In connection with any provision of the Credit Agreement whereby the Borrower submits to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction, we note the limitations of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332 on Federal court jurisdiction.

(f) Our opinions expressed above are limited to the law of the State of New York, and we do not express any opinion herein concerning any other law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the effect of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York wherein any Lender may be located or wherein enforcement of the Credit Agreement may be sought that limits the rates of interest legally chargeable or collectible.

This opinion letter speaks only as of the date hereof, and we expressly disclaim any responsibility to advise you of any development or circumstance, including changes of law of fact, that may occur after the date of this opinion letter that might affect the opinions expressed herein. This opinion letter is furnished to the addressees hereof solely in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Credit Agreement, is solely for the benefit of the addressees hereof and may not be relied upon by any other Person or for any other purpose without our prior written consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this opinion letter may be relied upon by any Person that becomes a Lender after the date hereof in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreement as if this opinion letter were addressed and delivered to such Person on the date hereof. Any such reliance must be actual and reasonable under the circumstances existing at the time such Person becomes a Lender, taking into account any changes in law or facts and any other developments known to or reasonably knowable by such Person at such time.
Very truly yours,

AHC:kty:mgj



EXHIBIT F-1

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Not Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record and beneficial owner of the Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a certificate of its non-U.S. Person status on IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.


[NAME OF LENDER]

By:______________________
Name:
Title:

Date: ________ __, 20[ ]



EXHIBIT F-2

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Not Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)


U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record and beneficial owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) it is not a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) it is not a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (iv) it is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with a certificate of its non-U.S. Person status on IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender in writing, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.


[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]

By:______________________
Name:
Title:

Date: ________ __, 20[ ]



EXHIBIT F-3

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Participants That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its direct or indirect partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such participation, (iii) with respect such participation, neither the undersigned nor any of its direct or indirect partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iv) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (v) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by one of the following forms from each of its partners/members that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption: (i) an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E, or (ii) an IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E from each of such partner’s/member’s beneficial owners that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.

[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]

By:______________________
Name:
Title:
 
Date: ________ __, 20[ ]



EXHIBIT F-4

FORM OF U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Partnerships
For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

U.S. TAX COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(For Foreign Lenders That Are Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)

Reference is hereby made to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Credit Agreement ”), among American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “ Borrower ”), the Lenders and LC Issuing Banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent (the “ Administrative Agent ”) for the Lenders.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) it is the sole record owner of the Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment) in respect of which it is providing this certificate, (ii) its direct or indirect partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of such Advance(s) and Commitment (as well as any promissory note(s) evidencing such Advance(s) and Commitment), (iii) with respect to the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, neither the undersigned nor any of its direct or indirect partners/members is a bank extending credit pursuant to a loan agreement entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, (iv) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a ten percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code and (v) none of its direct or indirect partners/members is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower as described in Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by one of the following forms from each of its partners/members that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption: (i) an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E or (ii) an IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN or W‑8BEN‑E from each of such partner’s/member’s beneficial owners that is claiming the portfolio interest exemption. By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.


F-4-2

Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.

[NAME OF LENDER]

By:______________________     
Name:
Title:

Date: ________ __, 20[ ]



Schedule I

Schedule of Initial Lenders
Lender Name
Commitment
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
$86,875,000
Barclays Bank PLC
$86,875,000
Citibank, N.A.
$86,875,000
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
$86,875,000
KeyBank National Association
$86,875,000
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.
$86,875,000
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
$86,875,000
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
$86,875,000
Bank of America, N.A.
$68,750,000
BNP Paribas
$68,750,000
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
$68,750,000
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
$68,750,000
Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.
$68,750,000
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.
$68,750,000
Royal Bank of Canada
$68,750,000
SunTrust Bank
$68,750,000
The Bank of New York Mellon
$68,750,000
The Bank of Nova Scotia
$68,750,000
U.S. Bank National Association
$68,750,000
UBS AG, Stamford Branch
$68,750,000
Compass Bank
$45,000,000
Fifth Third Bank
$45,000,000
PNC Bank, National Association
$45,000,000
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
$45,000,000
The Huntington National Bank
$25,000,000
The Northern Trust Company
$25,000,000
 
 
Total
$1,750,000,000

SCHEDULE I
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


Schedule 2.04(j)
Letters of Credit
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as LC Issuing Bank
Applicant
Obligor
Beneficiary
Reference
Outstanding Amount
OPCo
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
PJM Settlement, Inc.
CPCS-257665
$2,101,543.00
AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
PJM Settlement, Inc.
CPCS-257666
$1,600,000.00
AEP Energy Partners
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
PJM Settlement, Inc.
CPCS-257668
$4,600,000.00
The Royal Bank of Scotland, plc, as LC Issuing Bank
Applicant
Obligor
Beneficiary
Reference
Stated Amount
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Federal Insurance Company
LCA2414NY
$5,820,000.00
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation
LCA2906NY
$250,000.00
KeyBank National Association, as LC Issuing Bank
Applicant
Obligor
Beneficiary
Reference
Stated Amount
AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
ERCOT
S322452
$11,000,000.00
CSWE (Trent)
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
TXU Electric
S320201
$2,575,000.00


SCHEDULE 2.04(J)
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
SW Power Pool
S311978
$1,532,405.00
AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
MISO
S321583
$250,000.00
AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, NASDAQ Inc.
Chartis
S322478
$749,000.00
AEPSC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Southern Company Services
S312397
$250,000.00
I&M
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Travelers Insurance
S308520
$150,000.00
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Southwest Power
S322928000A
$8,500,000.00
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Zurich American Insurance Company
S323007000B
$1,034,375.00
 
 
 
 
 


SCHEDULE 2.04(J)
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


Schedule 4.01(m)
Significant Subsidiaries
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Indiana Michigan Power Company
AEP Utilities, Inc.
Southwestern Electric Power Company

SCHEDULE 4.01(M)
AEP - THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Exhibit 10(l)(1)(A)

AMENDMENT TO

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
(as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2011)


This Amendment is made by American Electric Power Service Corporation to the American Electric Power System Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) that was amended and restated effective January 1, 2011, by means of a document that was signed December 15, 2010.

WHEREAS, the Plan defines eligibility by reference to the salary grade level of the Company’s employees; and

WHEREAS, the Company intends to revise its entire salary grade structure effective January 1, 2015, rendering the current language obsolete; and

WHEREAS, the Company wants to maintain some degree of flexibility in selecting the employees who may be made eligible to make deferral elections under the Plan, while recognizing the requirement to limit eligibility to a select group of management or highly compensated employees;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.
Section 2.11 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“2.11 “Eligible Employee” means any employee of the Company who is designated by the Company as eligible to participate in this Plan, provided that such employees are limited to a select group of management or highly compensated employees. Individuals not directly compensated by the Company or who are not treated by the Company as an active employee shall not be considered Eligible Employees.”

2.    In all other respects, the terms of the Plan are ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 3rd day of December, 2014.

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION


By:
/s/ Tracy A. Elich
 
Tracy A. Elich
 
 
Vice President - Human Resources
 


Exhibit 10(q)(2)(A)

SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN
(as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008)


This Second Amendment is made by American Electric Power Service Corporation to the American Electric Power System Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (the “Plan”) that was amended and restated effective January 1, 2008, by means of a document that was signed December 31, 2008 and subsequently amended by the First Amendment thereto dated January 28, 2011.

WHEREAS, the Plan defines eligibility by reference to the salary grade level of the Company’s employees; and

WHEREAS, the Company intends to revise its entire salary grade structure effective January 1, 2015, rendering the current language obsolete; and

WHEREAS, the Company wants to maintain some degree of flexibility in selecting the employees who may be made eligible to make deferral elections under the Plan, while recognizing the requirement to limit eligibility to a select group of management or highly compensated employees;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.
Section 2.7 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“2.7 “Eligible Employee” means any employee of AEP who is designated by the Company as eligible to participate in this Plan, provided that such employees are limited to a select group of management or highly compensated employees. Individuals not directly compensated by AEP or who are not treated by AEP as an active employee shall not be considered Eligible Employees.”

2.    In all other respects, the terms of the Plan are ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 3rd day of December, 2014.

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION

By:
/s/ Tracy A. Elich
 
Tracy A. Elich
 
Vice President - Human Resources


Exhibit 10(r)

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

As Revised Effective January 1, 2015

Whereas, American Electric Power Service Corporation, a New York corporation, including any of its subsidiary companies, divisions, organizations, or affiliated entities (collectively referred to as “AEPSC”) considers it essential to its best interests and the best interests of the shareholders of the American Electric Power Company, Inc., a New York corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) to foster the continued employment of key management personnel; and

Whereas, the uncertainty attendant to a Change In Control of the Corporation may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of AEPSC and the shareholders of the Corporation; and

Whereas, the Board of the Corporation has determined that steps should be taken to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of members of AEPSC’s management to their assigned duties in the event of a Change In Control of the Corporation; and

Whereas, AEPSC therefore previously established the American Electric Power Service Corporation Change In Control Agreement (the “Agreement”), the most recent version of which was set forth in a document dated effective January 1, 2014; and

Whereas, the Human Resources Committee of the Board of the Corporation has directed that an Executive’s mandatory retirement be explicitly excluded from the Qualifying Terminations covered by the Agreement;

Now, Therefore, AEPSC hereby amends the Agreement in its entirety.


ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS

As used herein the following words and phrases shall have the following respective meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(a) “Anniversary Date” means January 1 of each Calendar Year.

(b) “Annual Compensation” means the sum of the Executive’s Annual Salary and the Executive’s Target Annual Incentive.

(c) “Annual Salary” means the Executive’s regular annual base salary immediately prior to the Executive’s Termination of employment, including




compensation converted to other benefits under a flexible pay arrangement maintained by AEPSC or deferred pursuant to a written plan or agreement with AEPSC, but excluding sign-on bonuses, allowances and compensation paid or payable under any of AEPSC’s long-term or short-term incentive plans or any similar payments, and any salary lump sum amount paid in lieu of or in addition to a base wage or salary increase.

(d) “Board” means the Board of Directors of American Electric Power Company, Inc.

(e) “Calendar Year” means the twelve (12) month period commencing each January 1 and ending each December 31.

(f) “Cause” shall mean

(i) the willful and continued failure of the Executive to perform substantially the Executive’s duties with AEPSC (other than any such failure as reasonably and consistently determined by the Board to have resulted from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Executive by the Board or an elected officer of AEPSC which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board or the elected officer believes that the Executive has not substantially performed the Executive’s duties, or

(ii) the willful conduct or omission by the Executive, which the Board determines to be illegal or gross misconduct that is demonstrably injurious to AEPSC or the Corporation; or a breach of the Executive’s fiduciary duty to AEPSC or the Corporation, as determined by the Board.

For purposes of this provision, no act or failure to act, on the part of the Executive, shall be considered “willful” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in bad faith or without reasonable belief that the Executive’s action or omission was in the best interests of AEPSC or the Corporation. Any act, or failure to act, based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or upon the advice of counsel for AEPSC or the Corporation, shall be conclusively presumed to be done, or omitted to be done, by the Executive in good faith and in the best interests of AEPSC or the Corporation

(g) “Change In Control” of the Corporation shall be deemed to have occurred if and as of such date that (i) any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)), other than AEPSC, any company owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Corporation in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Corporation or a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Corporation, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than one third of the then outstanding voting stock of the Corporation; or (ii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of


2


the Corporation with any other entity, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Corporation outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least two-thirds of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Corporation or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iii) the consummation of the complete liquidation of the Corporation or the sale or disposition by the Corporation (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets.

(h) “CIC Multiple” means a factor of (i) two and ninety-nine one-hundredths (2.99) with respect to the Chief Executive Officer of American Electric Power Service Corporation and such other Executives who are nominated for such factor by the Chief Executive Officer of American Electric Power Service Corporation and approved by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of the Corporation; or (ii) two (2.00) with respect to all other Executives.

(i) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

(j) “Commencement Date” means January 1, 2012, which shall be the beginning date of the term of this Agreement.

(k) “Disability” means the Executive’s total and permanent disability as defined in AEPSC’s long-term disability plan covering the Executive immediately prior to the Change In Control.

(l) “Executive” means an employee of AEPSC or the Corporation who is designated by AEPSC and approved by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of the Corporation as an employee entitled to benefits, if any, under the terms of this Agreement.

(m) “Good Reason” means

(1) an adverse change in the Executive’s status, duties or responsibilities as an executive of AEPSC as in effect immediately prior to the Change In Control;

(2) failure of AEPSC to pay or provide the Executive in a timely fashion the salary or benefits to which the Executive is entitled under any employment agreement between AEPSC and the Executive in effect on the date of the Change In Control, or under any benefit plans or policies in which the Executive was participating at the time of the Change In Control;

(3) the reduction of the Executive’s base salary as in effect on the date of the Change In Control;


3


(4) the taking of any action by AEPSC (including the elimination of a plan without providing substitutes therefor, the reduction of the Executive’s awards thereunder or failure to continue the Executive’s participation therein) that would substantially diminish the aggregate projected value of the Executive’s awards or benefits under AEPSC’s benefit plans or policies in which the Executive was participating at the time of the Change In Control; provided, however, that the diminishment of such awards or benefits that apply to other groups of employees of AEPSC in addition to Executives covered by this or a similar agreement shall be disregarded;

(5) a failure by AEPSC or the Corporation to obtain from any successor the assent to this Agreement contemplated by Article IV hereof; or

(6) the relocation, without the Executive’s prior approval, of the office at which the Executive is to perform services on behalf of AEPSC to a location more than fifty (50) miles from its location immediately prior to the Change In Control.

Any circumstance described in this Article I(m) shall constitute Good Reason even if such circumstance would not constitute a breach by AEPSC of the terms of an employment agreement between AEPSC and the Executive in effect on the date of the Change In Control. However, such circumstance shall not constitute Good Reason unless (i) within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of such circumstance, the Executive shall have given AEPSC written notice of such circumstance, and (ii) AEPSC shall have failed to remedy such circumstance within thirty (30) days after its receipt of such notice. Such written notice to be provided by the Executive to AEPSC shall specify (A) the effective date for the Executive’s proposed Termination of employment (provided that such effective date may not precede the expiration of the period for AEPSC’s opportunity to remedy), (B) reasonable detail of the facts and circumstances claimed to provide the basis for Termination, and (C) the Executive’s belief that such facts and circumstance would constitute Good Reason for purposes of this Agreement. The Executive’s continued employment shall not constitute consent to, or a waiver of rights with respect to, any circumstances constituting Good Reason hereunder.

(n)    “Mandatory Retirement” means the Termination of the Executive’s employment, if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the Executive is subject to mandatory retirement at age 65, and (ii) the Executive’s employment Terminates on the date the Executive attains age 65 or such later date specified by resolution of the Board (or such person or committee to whom the Board delegates the authority to make such determinations) adopted prior to the date the Executive attains age 65.


4


(o) “Qualifying Termination” shall mean following a Change In Control and during the term of this Agreement the Executive’s employment is Terminated for any reason excluding (i) the Executive’s death, (ii) the Executive’s Disability, (iii) the exhaustion of the Executive’s benefits under the terms of an applicable AEPSC sick pay plan or long-term disability plan (other than by reason of the amendment or termination of such a plan), (iv) the Executive’s Retirement or Mandatory Retirement, (v) by AEPSC for Cause or (vi) by the Executive without Good Reason. In addition, a Qualifying Termination shall be deemed to have occurred if, prior to a Change In Control, the Executive’s employment was Terminated during the term of this Agreement (A) by AEPSC without Cause, or (B) by the Executive based on events or circumstances that would constitute Good Reason if a Change in Control had occurred, in either case, (x) at the request of a person who has entered into an agreement with AEPSC or the Corporation, the consummation of which would constitute a Change In Control or (y) otherwise in connection with, as a result of or in anticipation of a Change In Control. For purposes of this Article I(o), (1) the mere act of approving a Change In Control agreement shall not in and of itself be deemed to constitute an event or circumstance in anticipation of a Change In Control, and (2) if an Executive’s level of services decreases to 50% or less of the average level of service performed during the previous 36-month period but does not completely end, such decrease shall not, of itself, be considered a Qualifying Termination, but may, under appropriate circumstance be taken into account in determining whether the Executive has Good Reason for Terminating employment, provided that if the Executive fails to establish that such decrease constitutes Good Reason for purposes of this Agreement, any subsequent termination of the Executive’s employment shall not be considered a Qualifying Termination.

(p) “Retirement” shall mean an Executive’s voluntary Termination of employment after attainment of age 55 with five or more years of service with AEPSC without Good Reason.

(q) “Target Annual Incentive” shall mean the award that the Executive would have received under the annual incentive compensation plan applicable to such Executive for the year in which the Executive’s Termination occurs, if one hundred percent (100%) of the annual target award has been earned. Executives not participating in an annual incentive compensation plan that has predefined target levels will be treated as though they were participants in an annual incentive plan with such targets and will be assigned the same annual target percent as their participating peers in a comparable salary grade.

(r) “Taxable Year” shall mean the taxable year of the Executive for federal income tax purposes, unless the context clearly indicates that the taxable year of a different taxpayer was intended.

(s) “Termination” means those circumstances considered to be a separation from service, determined in a manner consistent with the written policies adopted by the HR Committee of the Corporation from time to time to the extent such policies are consistent with the requirements imposed under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i).

5


(t) “Triggering Event” shall mean the event that triggered the Qualifying Termination (i.e., the Termination of the Executive’s employment or, if the Qualifying Termination is specified in Article I(o)(A) or (B), the Change in Control).


ARTICLE II
TERM OF AGREEMENT

2.1    The initial term of this Agreement shall be for the period beginning on the Commencement Date and ending on the December 31 immediately following the Commencement Date. The term of this Agreement shall automatically be extended for an additional Calendar Year on the first Anniversary Date immediately following the initial term of this Agreement without further action by AEPSC, and shall be automatically extended for an additional Calendar Year on each succeeding Anniversary Date, unless AEPSC shall have served notice upon the Executive at least thirty (30) days prior to such Anniversary Date of AEPSC’s intention that this Agreement shall not be extended, provided, however, that if a Change In Control of the Corporation shall occur during the term of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate two years after the date the Change In Control is completed.

2.2    If an employee is designated as an Executive after the Commencement Date or after an Anniversary Date, the initial term of this Agreement shall be for the period beginning on the date the employee is designated as an Executive and ending on the December 31 immediately following.

2.3    Notwithstanding Section 2.1, the term of this Agreement shall end upon any Termination of the Executive’s employment that is other than a Qualifying Termination in connection with a Change In Control of the Corporation. For example, this Agreement shall terminate if the Executive’s position is eliminated and the Executive’s employment is Terminated, other than in connection with a Change In Control of the Corporation, (i) due to a downsizing, consolidation or restructuring of AEPSC or of any other subsidiary of the Corporation or (ii) due to the sale, disposition or divestiture of all or a portion of AEPSC or of any other subsidiary of the Corporation.


ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION UPON A QUALIFYING TERMINATION IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROL

3.1    Except as otherwise provided in Section 3.3, upon a Qualifying Termination, the Executive shall be under no further obligation to perform services for AEPSC and shall be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits:

(a)
As soon as practicable following the Executive’s date of Termination, AEPSC shall make a lump sum cash payment to the Executive in an

    

6


amount equal to the sum of (1) the Executive’s Annual Salary through the date of Termination to the extent not theretofore paid, (2) the product of (x) the current plan year’s Target Annual Incentive and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in such calendar year through the date of Termination, and the denominator of which is 365, except that annual incentive plans which do not have predetermined annual target awards for participants shall have their pro-rated incentive compensation award for the current plan year paid as soon as practicable, and (3) any accrued vacation pay that otherwise would be available upon the Executive’s Termination of employment with AEPSC, in each case to the extent not theretofore paid and in full satisfaction of the rights of the Executive thereto; provided, however, in the case of a Qualifying Termination in the circumstances specified in Article I(o)(B), payment of the amount described in subsection (2) of this Section 3.1(a) shall not be made until immediately after the Change in Control event or circumstance; and

(b)
If the Executive timely satisfies the conditions set forth in Section 3.3, AEPSC shall make a lump sum cash payment to the Executive in an amount equal to the CIC Multiple times the Executive’s Annual Compensation. If the Qualifying Termination is specified in Article I(o) (A) or (B), no such lump sum payment shall be made unless and until the Change in Control related to the Qualifying Termination shall have occurred. If any of the periods specified for timely satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 3.3 shall end in a Taxable Year that is different from the Taxable Year of the Triggering Event, the lump sum payment specified in this paragraph (b) shall not be made until the Taxable Year in which such period ends, provided that such payment shall be made no later than the 15 th day of the third month of that later Taxable Year.

3.2    The Executive shall be entitled to such outplacement services and other non-cash severance or separation benefits as may then be available under the terms of a plan or agreement to groups of employees of AEPSC in addition to Executives who are covered under the terms of this or a similar agreement. See also section 3.3(b). To the extent any benefits described in this Article III, Section 3.2 cannot be provided pursuant to the appropriate plan or program maintained by AEPSC, AEPSC shall provide such benefits outside such plan or program at no additional cost to the Executive.

3.3    Notwithstanding the foregoing,

(a)
The severance payments and benefits provided under Sections 3.1(a)(2), 3.1(b), and 3.2 hereof shall be conditioned upon the Executive executing a release within the period specified therein, but in no event later than sixty (60) days after the Triggering Event, in the form established by the Corporation or by AEPSC, releasing the Corporation, AEPSC and their shareholders, partners, officers, directors, employees and agents from any

7


and all claims and from any and all causes of action of kind or character, including but not limited to all claims or causes of action arising out of Executive’s employment with the Corporation or AEPSC or the termination of such employment.

(b)
The severance payments and benefits provided under Sections 3.1(a)(2), 3.1(b), and 3.2 hereof shall be subject to, and conditioned upon, the timely waiver of any other cash severance payment or other benefits provided by AEPSC pursuant to any other severance agreement between AEPSC and the Executive. Such waiver shall not be considered timely unless received by AEPSC within sixty (60) days after the Triggering Event. No amount shall be payable under this Agreement to, or on behalf of the Executive, if the Executive elects benefits under any other cash severance plan or program, or any other special pay arrangement with respect to the termination of the Executive’s employment.

(c)
The Executive agrees that at all times following Termination, the Executive will not, without the prior written consent of AEPSC or the Corporation, disclose to any person, firm or corporation any “confidential information,” of AEPSC or the Corporation which is now known to the Executive or which hereafter may become known to the Executive as a result of the Executive’s employment or association with AEPSC or the Corporation, unless such disclosure is required under the terms of a valid and effective subpoena or order issued by a court or governmental body; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply to confidential information which becomes publicly disseminated by means other than a breach of this provision. It is recognized that damages in the event of breach of this Section 3.3(c) by the Executive would be difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain, and it is therefore agreed that AEPSC and the Corporation, in addition to and without limiting any other remedy or right that AEPSC or the Corporation may have, shall have the right to an injunction or other equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction, enjoining any such breach, and the Executive hereby waives any and all defenses the Executive may have on the ground of lack of jurisdiction or competence of the court to grant such an injunction or other equitable relief. The existence of this right shall not preclude AEPSC or the Corporation from pursuing any other rights or remedies at law or in equity which AEPSC or the Corporation may have.
    
“Confidential information” shall mean any confidential, propriety and or trade secret information, including, but not limited to, concepts, ideas, information and materials relating to AEPSC or the Corporation, client records, client lists, economic and financial analysis, financial data, customer contracts, marketing plans, notes, memoranda, lists, books, correspondence, manuals, reports or research, whether developed by AEPSC or the Corporation or developed by the Executive acting alone or

8


jointly with AEPSC or the Corporation while the Executive was employed by AEPSC.

3.4    The obligations of AEPSC to pay the benefits described in Sections 3.1, and 3.2 shall, subject to Section 3.3, be absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstances, including, without limitation, any set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right which AEPSC may have against the Executive; provided, however, AEPSC shall comply with and enforce obligations of AEPSC or the Executive under law determined by AEPSC to be applicable, including any withholding in order to comply with a court order. In no event shall the Executive be obligated to seek other employment or take any other action by way of mitigation of the amounts payable to the Executive under any of the provisions of this Agreement, nor shall the amount of any payment hereunder be reduced by any compensation earned by the Executive as a result of employment by another employer.

3.5    Executive alone shall be liable for the payment of any and all tax cost, incremental or otherwise, incurred by the Executive in connection with the provision of any benefits described in this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted to provide for the gross-up or other mitigation of any amount payable or benefit provided to the Executive under the terms of this Agreement as a result of such taxes.

3.6    Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if the Executive is a “specified employee” (as determined with respect AEPSC for purposes of Code Section 409A), the Executive shall not be entitled to any payments of amounts determined to be nonqualified deferred compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A upon separation of service prior to the earliest of (1) the date that is six months after the date of separation from service for any reason other than death, (2) the date of the Executive’s death, or (3) such earlier time that would not cause the Executive to incur any excise tax under Code Section 409A.


ARTICLE IV
SUCCESSOR TO CORPORATION

4.1    This Agreement shall bind any successor of AEPSC or the Corporation, its assets or its businesses (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) in the same manner and to the same extent that AEPSC or the Corporation would be obligated under this Agreement if no succession had taken place.

4.2    In the case of any transaction in which a successor would not by the foregoing provision or by operation of law be bound by this Agreement, AEPSC and the Corporation shall require such successor expressly and unconditionally to assume and agree to perform AEPSC’s and the Corporation’s obligations under this Agreement, in the same manner and to the same extent that AEPSC and the Corporation would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place. The term “Corporation,” as

9


used in this Agreement, shall mean the Corporation as hereinbefore defined and any successor or assignee to its business or assets which by reason hereof becomes bound by this Agreement.


ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS

5.1    Any notices and all other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered or mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid addressed to AEPSC at its principal office and to the Executive at the Executive’s residence or at such other addresses as AEPSC or the Executive shall designate in writing.

5.2    Except to the extent otherwise provided in Article II (Term of Agreement), no provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged except in writing specifically referring to such provision and signed by either AEPSC or the Executive against whom enforcement of such modification, waiver or discharge is sought. No waiver by either AEPSC or the Executive of the breach of any condition or provision of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any other condition or provision at the same or any other time.

5.3    The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Ohio.

5.4    The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.

5.5    This Agreement does not constitute a contract of employment or impose on the Executive, AEPSC or the Corporation any obligation to retain the Executive as an employee, to change the status of the Executive’s employment, or to change AEPSC’s policies regarding the termination of employment.

5.6    If the Executive institutes any legal action in seeking to obtain or enforce or is required to defend in any legal action the validity or enforceability of, any right or benefit provided by this Agreement, AEPSC will pay for all actual and reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred (as incurred) by the Executive, regardless of the outcome of such action; provided, however, that if such action instituted by the Executive is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be frivolous, the Executive shall not be entitled to legal fees and expenses and shall be liable to AEPSC for amounts already paid for this purpose.

5.7    If the Executive makes a written request alleging a right to receive benefits under this Agreement or alleging a right to receive an adjustment in benefits being paid under the Agreement, AEPSC shall treat it as a claim for benefit. All claims for benefit

10


under the Agreement shall be sent to the Human Resources Department of AEPSC and must be received within 30 days after the Executive’s Termination of employment (or, if the Qualifying Termination is specified in Article I(o)(A) or (B), within 30 days after the Change in Control). If AEPSC determines that the Executive who has claimed a right to receive benefits, or different benefits, under the Agreement is not entitled to receive all or any part of the benefits claimed, it will inform the Executive in writing of its determination and the reasons therefor in terms calculated to be understood by the Executive. The notice will be sent within 90 days of the claim unless AEPSC determines additional time, not exceeding 90 days, is needed. The notice shall make specific reference to the pertinent Agreement provisions on which the denial is based, and describe any additional material or information, if any, necessary for the Executive to perfect the claim and the reason any such additional material or information is necessary. Such notice shall, in addition, inform the Executive what procedure the Executive should follow to take advantage of the review procedures set forth below in the event the Executive desires to contest the denial of the claim. The Executive may within 90 days thereafter submit in writing to AEPSC a notice that the Executive contests the denial of the claim by AEPSC and desires a further review. AEPSC shall within 60 days thereafter review the claim and authorize the Executive to appear personally and review pertinent documents and submit issues and comments relating to the claim to the persons responsible for making the determination on behalf of AEPSC. AEPSC will render its final decision with specific reasons therefor in writing and will transmit it to the Executive within 60 days of the written request for review, unless AEPSC determines additional time, not exceeding 60 days, is needed, and so notifies the Executive. If AEPSC fails to respond to a claim filed in accordance with the foregoing within 60 days or any such extended period, AEPSC shall be deemed to have denied the claim.

5.8    AEPSC intends that the design and administration of this Agreement are intended to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A to the extent such section is effective and applicable to amounts that may become available hereunder. However, no Executive, beneficiary or any other person shall have any recourse against AEPSC, the Corporation, or any of their affiliates, employees, agents, successors, assigns or other representatives if this condition is determined not to be satisfied.

AEPSC has caused this Change In Control Agreement to be signed on behalf of all participating employers as of the 21st day of November, 2014.

American Electric Power Service Corporation
By:
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
 
Nicholas K. Akins
 
President & CEO

11
Exhibit 10(t)(1)(A)

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM
STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT PLAN
(as Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2014)


This First Amendment is made by American Electric Power Service Corporation to the American Electric Power System Stock Ownership Requirement Plan (the “Plan”) that was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014, by means of a document that was signed June 9, 2014.

WHEREAS, in defining who is an Eligible Employee, the Plan currently makes reference to the salary grade level of the Company’s employees; and

WHEREAS, the Company intends to revise its entire salary grade structure effective January 1, 2015, rendering the current language obsolete; and

WHEREAS, the Company intends to keep the Plan document clear in its description of the employees eligible to participate;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.
Section 2.11 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“2.11 “Eligible Employee” means any employee of AEP who is hired into or promoted to a position that is eligible to be assigned a Minimum Stock Ownership Requirement, and only so long as a Minimum Stock Ownership Requirement applies. An individual who is not directly compensated by AEP or who is not treated by AEP as an active employee shall not be considered an Eligible Employee.”

2.    In all other respects, the terms of the Plan are ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 3rd day of December, 2014.

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION

By:
/s/ Tracy A. Elich
 
Tracy A. Elich
 
Vice President - Human Resources




EXHIBIT 12
 
 
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings
 
$
1,849

 
$
2,367

 
$
1,822

 
$
2,110

 
$
2,490

Income Distributed from Equity Method Investment
 

 

 

 

 
23

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
1,254

 
1,209

 
1,257

 
1,136

 
1,104

Preferred Security Dividend Requirements of
   Consolidated Subsidiaries
 
(4
)
 
(8
)
 

 

 

Total Earnings
 
$
3,099

 
$
3,568

 
$
3,079

 
$
3,246

 
$
3,617

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
999

 
$
933

 
$
988

 
$
906

 
$
885

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used
   During Construction
 
53

 
63

 
69

 
40

 
44

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
198

 
205

 
200

 
190

 
175

Preferred Security Dividend Requirements of
   Consolidated Subsidiaries
 
4

 
8

 

 

 

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
1,254

 
$
1,209

 
$
1,257

 
$
1,136

 
$
1,104

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
2.47

 
2.95

 
2.44

 
2.85

 
3.27






EXHIBIT 12
 
 
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Taxes
 
$
210,898

 
$
252,618

 
$
423,030

 
$
326,146

 
$
370,343

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
217,500

 
217,280

 
210,421

 
201,704

 
220,480

Total Earnings
 
$
428,398

 
$
469,898

 
$
633,451

 
$
527,850

 
$
590,823

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
207,649

 
$
204,623

 
$
202,074

 
$
192,982

 
$
209,570

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds
   Used During Construction
 
2,251

 
6,257

 
1,347

 
1,522

 
3,810

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
7,600

 
6,400

 
7,000

 
7,200

 
7,100

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
217,500

 
$
217,280

 
$
210,421

 
$
201,704

 
$
220,480

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
1.96

 
2.16

 
3.01

 
2.61

 
2.67






EXHIBIT 12
 
 
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Taxes
 
$
189,517

 
$
201,434

 
$
157,801

 
$
252,615

 
$
235,268

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
174,965

 
168,003

 
168,656

 
167,362

 
158,990

Total Earnings
 
$
364,482

 
$
369,437

 
$
326,457

 
$
419,977

 
$
394,258

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
104,465

 
$
97,665

 
$
102,739

 
$
97,710

 
$
93,475

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds
   Used During Construction
 
8,500

 
7,838

 
4,717

 
9,752

 
8,015

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
62,000

 
62,500

 
61,200

 
59,900

 
57,500

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
174,965

 
$
168,003

 
$
168,656

 
$
167,362

 
$
158,990

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
2.08

 
2.19

 
1.93

 
2.50

 
2.47






EXHIBIT 12
 
 
OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Taxes
 
$
842,922

 
$
678,690

 
$
487,817

 
$
635,650

 
$
348,629

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
269,886

 
248,026

 
245,446

 
215,548

 
136,127

Total Earnings
 
$
1,112,808

 
$
926,716

 
$
733,263

 
$
851,198

 
$
484,756

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
242,000

 
$
221,976

 
$
213,100

 
$
182,046

 
$
128,291

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds
   Used During Construction
 
3,786

 
2,350

 
9,046

 
10,102

 
4,436

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
24,100

 
23,700

 
23,300

 
23,400

 
3,400

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
269,886

 
$
248,026

 
$
245,446

 
$
215,548

 
$
136,127

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
4.12

 
3.73

 
2.98

 
3.94

 
3.56






EXHIBIT 12
 
 
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Taxes
 
$
122,887

 
$
192,257

 
$
180,835

 
$
163,681

 
$
137,511

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
65,834

 
58,822

 
58,984

 
57,647

 
58,233

Total Earnings
 
$
188,721

 
$
251,079

 
$
239,819

 
$
221,328

 
$
195,744

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
63,362

 
$
54,700

 
$
55,286

 
$
53,175

 
$
54,641

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction
 
572

 
822

 
1,098

 
2,272

 
1,792

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
1,900

 
3,300

 
2,600

 
2,200

 
1,800

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
65,834

 
$
58,822

 
$
58,984

 
$
57,647

 
$
58,233

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
2.86

 
4.26

 
4.06

 
3.83

 
3.36






EXHIBIT 12 

 
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
EARNINGS
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income Before Income Taxes and Equity Earnings
 
$
208,484

 
$
219,283

 
$
245,862

 
$
220,957

 
$
208,761

Fixed Charges (as below)
 
132,106

 
134,285

 
147,817

 
144,844

 
142,276

Total Earnings
 
$
340,590

 
$
353,568

 
$
393,679

 
$
365,801

 
$
351,037

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIXED CHARGES
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
$
86,538

 
$
81,781

 
$
88,318

 
$
130,282

 
$
126,127

Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction
 
33,668

 
40,904

 
48,499

 
4,262

 
6,949

Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals
 
11,900

 
11,600

 
11,000

 
10,300

 
9,200

Total Fixed Charges
 
$
132,106

 
$
134,285

 
$
147,817

 
$
144,844

 
$
142,276

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
2.57

 
2.63

 
2.66

 
2.52

 
2.46






2014 Annual Reports

American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Appalachian Power Company and Subsidiaries
Indiana Michigan Power Company and Subsidiaries
Ohio Power Company and Subsidiaries
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated









Audited Financial Statements and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations















AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
INDEX OF ANNUAL REPORTS
 
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



GLOSSARY OF TERMS

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below:
Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
AEGCo
 
AEP Generating Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
AEP or Parent
 
American Electric Power Company, Inc., an electric utility holding company.
AEP Consolidated
 
AEP and its majority owned consolidated subsidiaries and consolidated affiliates.
AEP Credit
 
AEP Credit, Inc., a consolidated variable interest entity of AEP which securitizes accounts receivable and accrued utility revenues for affiliated electric utility companies.
AEP East Companies
 
APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo.
AEP Energy
 
AEP Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned retail electric supplier for customers in Ohio, Illinois and other deregulated electricity markets throughout the United States.
AEP System
 
American Electric Power System, an electric system, owned and operated by AEP subsidiaries.
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.
AEPEP
 
AEP Energy Partners, Inc., a subsidiary of AEP dedicated to wholesale marketing and trading, asset management and commercial and industrial sales in the deregulated Texas market.
AEPES
 
AEP Energy Services, Inc., a subsidiary of AEP Resources, Inc.
AEPSC
 
American Electric Power Service Corporation, an AEP service subsidiary providing management and professional services to AEP and its subsidiaries.
AFUDC
 
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.
AGR
 
AEP Generation Resources Inc., a nonregulated AEP subsidiary in the Generation & Marketing segment.
AOCI
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
APCo
 
Appalachian Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
APSC
 
Arkansas Public Service Commission.
Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding
 
Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of APCo and a consolidated variable interest entity formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to the under-recovered ENEC deferral balance.
ASU
 
Accounting Standards Update.
BlueStar
 
BlueStar Energy Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned retail electric supplier for customers in Ohio, Illinois and other deregulated electricity markets throughout the United States.  BlueStar began doing business as AEP Energy, Inc. in June 2012.
CAA
 
Clean Air Act.
CLECO
 
Central Louisiana Electric Company, a nonaffiliated utility company.
CO 2
 
Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Cook Plant
 
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, a two-unit, 2,191 MW nuclear plant owned by I&M.
CRES provider
 
Competitive Retail Electric Service providers under Ohio law that target retail customers by offering alternative generation service.
CSPCo
 
Columbus Southern Power Company, a former AEP electric utility subsidiary that was merged into OPCo effective December 31, 2011.
CWIP
 
Construction Work in Progress.
DCC Fuel
 
DCC Fuel IV LLC, DCC Fuel V LLC, DCC Fuel VI LLC and DCC Fuel VII, consolidated variable interest entities formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and leasing nuclear fuel to I&M.
DHLC
 
Dolet Hills Lignite Company, LLC, a wholly-owned lignite mining subsidiary of SWEPCo.
EIS
 
Energy Insurance Services, Inc., a nonaffiliated captive insurance company and consolidated variable interest entity of AEP.
ENEC
 
Expanded Net Energy Charge.

i


Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
Energy Supply
 
AEP Energy Supply LLC, a nonregulated holding company for AEP’s competitive generation, wholesale and retail businesses, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.
ERCOT
 
Electric Reliability Council of Texas regional transmission organization.
ESP
 
Electric Security Plans, a PUCO requirement for electric utilities to adjust their rates by filing with the PUCO.
ETT
 
Electric Transmission Texas, LLC, an equity interest joint venture between AEP and Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company formed to own and operate electric transmission facilities in ERCOT.
FAC
 
Fuel Adjustment Clause.
FASB
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Federal EPA
 
United States Environmental Protection Agency.
FERC
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
FGD
 
Flue Gas Desulfurization or scrubbers.
FTR
 
Financial Transmission Right, a financial instrument that entitles the holder to receive compensation for certain congestion-related transmission charges that arise when the power grid is congested resulting in differences in locational prices.
GAAP
 
Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America.
I&M
 
Indiana Michigan Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
IEU
 
Industrial Energy Users-Ohio.
IGCC
 
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, technology that turns coal into a cleaner-burning gas.
Interconnection Agreement
 
An agreement by and among APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo, which defined the sharing of costs and benefits associated with their respective generation plants.  This agreement was terminated January 1, 2014.
IRS
 
Internal Revenue Service.
IURC
 
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
KGPCo
 
Kingsport Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
KPCo
 
Kentucky Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
KPSC
 
Kentucky Public Service Commission.
kV
 
Kilovolt.
KWh
 
Kilowatthour.
LPSC
 
Louisiana Public Service Commission.
MISO
 
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator.
MLR
 
Member load ratio, the method used to allocate transactions among members of the Interconnection Agreement.
MMBtu
 
Million British Thermal Units.
MPSC
 
Michigan Public Service Commission.
MTM
 
Mark-to-Market.
MW
 
Megawatt.
MWh
 
Megawatthour.
NO x
 
Nitrogen oxide.
Nonutility Money Pool
 
Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain nonutility subsidiaries.
NSR
 
New Source Review.
OATT
 
Open Access Transmission Tariff.
OCC
 
Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma.
Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding
 
Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of OPCo and a consolidated variable interest entity formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to phase-in recovery property.
OPCo
 
Ohio Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
OPEB
 
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.

ii


Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
Operating Agreement
 
Agreement, dated January 1, 1997, as amended, by and among PSO and SWEPCo governing generating capacity allocation, energy pricing, and revenues and costs of third party sales.  AEPSC acts as the agent.
OTC
 
Over the counter.
OVEC
 
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, which is 43.47% owned by AEP.
PCA
 
Power Coordination Agreement among APCo, I&M and KPCo.
PIRR
 
Phase-In Recovery Rider.
PJM
 
Pennsylvania – New Jersey – Maryland regional transmission organization.
PM
 
Particulate Matter.
POLR
 
Provider of Last Resort revenues.
PSO
 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
PUCO
 
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
PUCT
 
Public Utility Commission of Texas.
Registrant Subsidiaries
 
AEP subsidiaries which are SEC registrants; APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo.
Risk Management Contracts
 
Trading and nontrading derivatives, including those derivatives designated as cash flow and fair value hedges.
Rockport Plant
 
A generation plant, consisting of two 1,310 MW coal-fired generating units near Rockport, Indiana.  AEGCo and I&M jointly-own Unit 1.  In 1989, AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction with Wilmington Trust Company, an unrelated, unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2.
RPM
 
Reliability Pricing Model.
RSR
 
Retail Stability Rider.
RTO
 
Regional Transmission Organization, responsible for moving electricity over large interstate areas.
Sabine
 
Sabine Mining Company, a lignite mining company that is a consolidated variable interest entity for AEP and SWEPCo.
SEC
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
SEET
 
Significantly Excessive Earnings Test.
SIA
 
System Integration Agreement, effective June 15, 2000, as amended, provides contractual basis for coordinated planning, operation and maintenance of the power supply sources of the combined AEP.
SNF
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel.
SO 2
 
Sulfur dioxide.
SPP
 
Southwest Power Pool regional transmission organization.
SSO
 
Standard service offer.
Stall Unit
 
J. Lamar Stall Unit at Arsenal Hill Plant, a 534 MW natural gas unit owned by SWEPCo.
SWEPCo
 
Southwestern Electric Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
TCC
 
AEP Texas Central Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
Texas Restructuring Legislation
 
Legislation enacted in 1999 to restructure the electric utility industry in Texas.
TNC
 
AEP Texas North Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
Transition Funding
 
AEP Texas Central Transition Funding I LLC, AEP Texas Central Transition Funding II LLC and AEP Texas Central Transition Funding III LLC, wholly-owned subsidiaries of TCC and consolidated variable interest entities formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to Texas Restructuring Legislation.
Transource Energy
 
Transource Energy, LLC, a consolidated variable interest entity formed for the purpose of investing in utilities which develop, acquire, construct, own and operate transmission facilities in accordance with FERC-approved rates.
Transource Missouri
 
A 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of Transource Energy.
Turk Plant
 
John W. Turk, Jr. Plant, a 600 MW coal-fired plant in Arkansas that is 73% owned by SWEPCo.

iii


Term
 
Meaning
 
 
 
Utility Money Pool
 
Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain utility subsidiaries.
VIE
 
Variable Interest Entity.
Virginia SCC
 
Virginia State Corporation Commission.
WPCo
 
Wheeling Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
WVPSC
 
Public Service Commission of West Virginia.

iv


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report made by AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Many forward-looking statements appear in “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” but there are others throughout this document which may be identified by words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “continue” and similar expressions, and include statements reflecting future results or guidance and statements of outlook.  These matters are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.  Forward-looking statements in this document are presented as of the date of this document.  Except to the extent required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.  Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are:
Ÿ
The economic climate, growth or contraction within and changes in market demand and demographic patterns in our service territory.
Ÿ
Inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends.
Ÿ
Volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability of capital on reasonable terms and developments impairing our ability to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt at attractive rates.
Ÿ
The availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material.
Ÿ
Electric load, customer growth and the impact of competition, including competition for retail customers.
Ÿ
Weather conditions, including storms and drought conditions, and our ability to recover significant storm restoration costs.
Ÿ
Available sources and costs of, and transportation for, fuels and the creditworthiness and performance of fuel suppliers and transporters.
Ÿ
Availability of necessary generation capacity and the performance of our generation plants.
Ÿ
Our ability to recover increases in fuel and other energy costs through regulated or competitive electric rates.
Ÿ
Our ability to build or acquire generation capacity and transmission lines and facilities (including our ability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals and permits) when needed at acceptable prices and terms and to recover those costs.
Ÿ
New legislation, litigation and government regulation, including oversight of nuclear generation, energy commodity trading and new or heightened requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot or particulate matter and other substances or additional regulation of fly ash and similar combustion products that could impact the continued operation, cost recovery and/or profitability of our generation plants and related assets.
Ÿ
Evolving public perception of the risks associated with fuels used before, during and after the generation of electricity, including nuclear fuel.
Ÿ
A reduction in the federal statutory tax rate could result in an accelerated return of deferred federal income taxes to customers.
Ÿ
Timing and resolution of pending and future rate cases, negotiations and other regulatory decisions, including rate or other recovery of new investments in generation, distribution and transmission service and environmental compliance.
Ÿ
Resolution of litigation.
Ÿ
Our ability to constrain operation and maintenance costs.
Ÿ
Our ability to develop and execute a strategy based on a view regarding prices of electricity and other energy-related commodities.
Ÿ
Prices and demand for power that we generate and sell at wholesale.
Ÿ
Changes in technology, particularly with respect to new, developing, alternative or distributed sources of generation.
Ÿ
Our ability to recover through rates or market prices any remaining unrecovered investment in generation units that may be retired before the end of their previously projected useful lives.
Ÿ
Volatility and changes in markets for capacity and electricity, coal and other energy-related commodities, particularly changes in the price of natural gas and capacity auction returns.
Ÿ
Changes in utility regulation and the allocation of costs within regional transmission organizations, including ERCOT, PJM and SPP.

v


Ÿ
The transition to market for generation in Ohio, including the implementation of ESPs and our ability to recover investments in our Ohio generation assets.
Ÿ
Our ability to successfully and profitably manage our separate competitive generation assets.
Ÿ
Changes in the creditworthiness of the counterparties with whom we have contractual arrangements, including participants in the energy trading market.
Ÿ
Actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of our debt.
Ÿ
The impact of volatility in the capital markets on the value of the investments held by our pension, other postretirement benefit plans, captive insurance entity and nuclear decommissioning trust and the impact of such volatility on future funding requirements.
Ÿ
Accounting pronouncements periodically issued by accounting standard-setting bodies.
Ÿ
Other risks and unforeseen events, including wars, the effects of terrorism (including increased security costs), embargoes, cyber security threats and other catastrophic events.
The forward looking statements of AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made.  AEP and its Registrant Subsidiaries expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information.  For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of this report.

vi


AEP COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

The AEP common stock quarterly high and low sales prices, quarter-end closing price and the cash dividends paid per share are shown in the following table:
Quarter Ended
 
High
 
Low
 
Quarter-End
Closing Price
 
Dividend
December 31, 2014
 
$
63.22

 
$
51.97

 
$
60.72

 
$
0.53

September 30, 2014
 
55.91

 
49.06

 
52.21

 
0.50

June 30, 2014
 
55.94

 
49.99

 
55.77

 
0.50

March 31, 2014
 
50.95

 
45.80

 
50.66

 
0.50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
$
48.40

 
$
43.01

 
$
46.74

 
$
0.50

September 30, 2013
 
47.59

 
41.83

 
43.35

 
0.49

June 30, 2013
 
51.60

 
42.83

 
44.78

 
0.49

March 31, 2013
 
48.68

 
42.92

 
48.63

 
0.47


AEP common stock is traded principally on the New York Stock Exchange.  As of December 31, 2014 , AEP had approximately 74,000 registered shareholders.


vii



AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
 
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
STATEMENTS OF INCOME DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
17,020

 
$
15,357

 
$
14,945

 
$
15,116

 
$
14,427

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Income
 
$
3,232

 
$
2,855

 
$
2,656

 
$
2,782

 
$
2,663

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Before Extraordinary Items
 
$
1,638

 
$
1,484

 
$
1,262

 
$
1,576

 
$
1,218

Extraordinary Items, Net of Tax
 

 

 

 
373

 

Net Income
 
1,638

 
1,484

 
1,262

 
1,949

 
1,218

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 
4

 
3

 
3

 
4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP SHAREHOLDERS
 
1,634

 
1,480

 
1,259

 
1,946

 
1,214

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements of Subsidiaries Including Capital Stock Expense
 

 

 

 
5

 
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
1,634

 
$
1,480

 
$
1,259

 
$
1,941

 
$
1,211

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BALANCE SHEETS DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
64,305

 
$
60,285

 
$
57,454

 
$
55,670

 
$
53,740

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
20,188

 
19,288

 
18,691

 
18,699

 
18,066

Total Property, Plant and Equipment – Net
 
$
44,117

 
$
40,997

 
$
38,763

 
$
36,971

 
$
35,674

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
 
$
59,633

 
$
56,414

 
$
54,367

 
$
52,223

 
$
50,455

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total AEP Common Shareholders’ Equity
 
$
16,820

 
$
16,085

 
$
15,237

 
$
14,664

 
$
13,622

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
$
4

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative Preferred Stock Not Subject to Mandatory Redemption
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
60

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt (a)
 
$
18,684

 
$
18,377

 
$
17,757

 
$
16,516

 
$
16,811

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations Under Capital Leases (a)
 
$
552

 
$
538

 
$
449

 
$
458

 
$
474

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AEP COMMON STOCK DATA
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders:
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Before Extraordinary Items
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60

 
$
3.25

 
$
2.53

Extraordinary Items, Net of Tax
 

 

 

 
0.77

 

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Basic Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60

 
$
4.02

 
$
2.53

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding (in millions)
 
489

 
487

 
485

 
482

 
479

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Price Range:
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High
 
$
63.22

 
$
51.60

 
$
45.41

 
$
41.71

 
$
37.94

Low
 
$
45.80

 
$
41.83

 
$
36.97

 
$
33.09

 
$
28.17

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year-end Market Price
 
$
60.72

 
$
46.74

 
$
42.68

 
$
41.31

 
$
35.98

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Dividends Declared per AEP Common Share
 
$
2.03

 
$
1.95

 
$
1.88

 
$
1.85

 
$
1.71

 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividend Payout Ratio
 
60.78
%
 
64.14
%
 
72.31
%
 
46.02
%
 
67.59
%
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Book Value per AEP Common Share
 
$
34.37

 
$
32.98

 
$
31.35

 
$
30.36

 
$
28.32


(a)
Includes portion due within one year.

1


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) is one of the largest investor-owned electric public utility holding companies in the United States.  Our electric utility operating companies provide generation, transmission and distribution services to more than five million retail customers in Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia.

Our subsidiaries operate an extensive portfolio of assets including:

Approximately 37,600 megawatts of generating capacity, one of the largest complements of generation in the United States.
Approximately 40,000 miles of transmission lines, including 2,110   miles of 765 kV lines, the backbone of the electric interconnection grid in the Eastern United States.
Approximately 222,000   miles of distribution lines that deliver electricity to 5.3 million customers.
Substantial commodity transportation assets (approximately 4,990   railcars, approximately 2,800 barges, 47 towboats, 20 harbor boats and a coal handling terminal with approximately 18 million tons of annual capacity).  Our commercial barging operations annually transport approximately 48 million tons of coal and dry bulk commodities.  Approximately 35% of the barging is for transportation of agricultural products, 34% for coal, 17% for steel and 14% for other commodities.

Customer Demand

In comparison to 2013, our weather-normalized retail sales increased 1% for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our 2014 industrial sales increased 0.4% compared to 2013, despite the closure of Ormet, a large aluminum company in October 2013. Excluding Ormet, our industrial sales volumes increased by 3.9%. Our 2014 residential and commercial sales increased 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively, compared to 2013.
In 2015, we anticipate weather-normalized retail sales will increase by 0.6%. The industrial class is expected to grow by 2% in 2015, primarily related to a number of new oil and natural gas expansions, especially around the major shale gas areas within AEP’s footprint. Weather-normalized residential sales are projected to increase by 0.2%, primarily related to projected customer growth. Commercial class energy sales are projected to decrease by 0.4%.

Corporate Separation

Background

On December 31, 2013, as approved by the FERC and the PUCO, OPCo transferred its generation assets and related generation liabilities at net book value to AGR.  In accordance with Ohio law, OPCo remains responsible to provide power and capacity to OPCo customers who have not switched electric providers.  Effective January 1, 2014, OPCo began purchasing power from both affiliated and nonaffiliated entities, subject to PUCO approval, to meet the energy and capacity needs of customers. On December 31, 2013, subsequent to the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets and associated liabilities to AGR, AGR transferred at net book value its ownership (867 MW) in Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo and one-half of its interest (780 MW) in the Mitchell Plant to KPCo.  


2


Other Impacts of Corporate Separation

The Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection Agreement was also terminated.

Effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved the following:

A PCA among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.
A Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as agent to address open commitments related to the termination of the Interconnection Agreement and responsibilities to PJM.
A Power Supply Agreement between AGR and OPCo for AGR to supply capacity for OPCo’s switched (at $188.88 /MW day) and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015 and to supply the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that was not acquired through auctions in 2014.
 
For a further discussion of corporate separation, see the “Corporate Separation” section of Note 1.

Merchant Fleet Alternatives

AEP is evaluating strategic alternatives for its merchant generation fleet, which primarily includes AGR’s generation fleet and AEG's Lawrenceburg unit which operates in PJM as well as a 54.7% interest in the Oklaunion Plant which operates in ERCOT.  Potential alternatives may include, but are not limited to, continued ownership of the merchant generation fleet, executing a purchased power agreement with a regulated affiliate for certain merchant generation units in Ohio, a spin-off of the merchant generation fleet or a sale of the merchant generation fleet.  Management has not made a decision regarding the potential alternatives, nor has management set a specific time frame for a decision.  Certain of these alternatives could result in a loss which could reduce future net income and cash flow and impact financial condition.

Merchant Portion of Turk Plant

SWEPCo constructed the Turk Plant, a new base load 600 MW pulverized coal ultra-supercritical generating unit in Arkansas, which was placed into service in December 2012. SWEPCo owns 73% (440 MW) of the Turk Plant and operates the facility.

The APSC granted approval for SWEPCo to build the Turk Plant by issuing a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need (CECPN) for the SWEPCo Arkansas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant (approximately 20%). Following an appeal by certain intervenors, the Arkansas Supreme Court issued a decision that reversed the APSC’s grant of the CECPN. In June 2010, in response to an Arkansas Supreme Court decision, the APSC issued an order which reversed and set aside the previously granted CECPN. This Turk Plant output is currently not subject to cost-based rate recovery and is being sold into the wholesale market. Approximately 80% of the Turk plant is recovered under cost-based rate recovery in Texas, Louisiana, and through SWEPCo’s wholesale customers.

If SWEPCo cannot ultimately recover its investment and expenses related to the Turk Plant, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


3


Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings

2009 - 2011 ESP

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate proceeding which implemented a PIRR to recover OPCo’s deferred fuel costs in rates beginning September 2012. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Ohio were held in February 2015. OPCo presented arguments to reinstate a weighted average cost of capital carrying charge and to defend against an intervenor argument that the carrying charges should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit. 
 
June 2012 - May 2015 Ohio ESP Including Capacity Charge

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order which adopted and modified a new ESP that establishes base generation rates through May 2015. This ruling was generally upheld in PUCO rehearing orders in January and March 2013.

In July 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate capacity proceeding which stated that OPCo must charge CRES providers the RPM price and authorized OPCo to defer a portion of its incurred capacity costs not recovered from CRES providers up to $188.88/MW day. The OPCo RPM price collected from CRES providers, which includes reserve margins, was approximately $34/MW day through May 2014 and is $150/MW day from June 2014 through May 2015. In December 2012, various parties filed notices of appeal of the capacity costs decision with the Supreme Court of Ohio.

As part of the August 2012 ESP order, the PUCO established a non-bypassable RSR, effective September 2012. The RSR was collected from customers at $3.50/MWh through May 2014 and is currently collected at $4.00/MWh for the period June 2014 through May 2015, with $1.00/MWh applied to the recovery of deferred capacity costs. In April and May 2013, OPCo and various intervenors filed appeals with the Supreme Court of Ohio challenging portions of the PUCO’s ESP order, including the RSR. As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo’s incurred deferred capacity costs balance was $422 million, including debt carrying costs.

In November 2013, the PUCO issued an order approving OPCo’s competitive bid process with modifications. As ordered, in 2014, OPCo conducted multiple energy-only auctions for a total of 100% of the SSO load with delivery beginning April 2014 through May 2015. For delivery starting in June 2015, OPCo will conduct energy and capacity auctions for its entire SSO load. The PUCO also approved the unbundling of the FAC into fixed and energy-related components and an intervenor proposal to blend the $188.88/MW day capacity price in proportion to the percentage of energy planned to be auctioned. Additionally, the PUCO ordered that intervenor concerns related to the recovery of the fixed fuel costs through potentially both the FAC and the approved capacity charges be addressed in subsequent FAC proceedings. Management believes that these intervenor concerns are without merit.

In January 2014, the PUCO denied all rehearing requests and agreed to issue a supplemental request for an independent auditor in the 2012 - 2013 FAC proceeding to separately examine the recovery of the fixed fuel costs, including OVEC. In March 2014, the PUCO approved OPCo’s request to implement riders related to the unbundling of the FAC. In October 2014, the independent auditor, selected by the PUCO, filed its report for the period August 2012 through May 2015 with the PUCO. If the PUCO ultimately concludes that a portion of the fixed fuel costs are also recovered through OPCo's $188.88 capacity charge, the independent auditor recommends a methodology for calculating a refund of a portion of certain fixed fuel costs. The retail share of these fixed fuel costs is approximately $90 million annually. A hearing related to this matter has not been scheduled. Management believes that no over-recovery of costs has occurred and intends to oppose the findings in the audit report.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


4


Proposed June 2015 - May 2018 ESP

In December 2013, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO to approve an ESP that includes proposed rate adjustments and the continuation and modification of certain existing riders effective June 2015 through May 2018. The proposal included a return on common equity of 10.65% on capital costs for certain riders and estimates an average decrease in rates of 9% over the three-year term of the plan for customers who receive their RPM capacity and energy auction-based generation through OPCo. The proposal also included a purchased power agreement (PPA) rider that would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based purchase power agreement. In May 2014, intervenors and the PUCO staff filed testimony that provided various recommendations including the rejection and/or modification of various riders, including the Distribution Investment Rider and the proposed PPA. Hearings at the PUCO in the ESP case were held in June 2014.

In July 2014, OPCo submitted a separate application to continue the RSR established in the June 2012 - May 2015 ESP to collect the unrecovered portion of the deferred capacity costs at the rate of $4.00/MWh, until the balance of the capacity deferrals has been collected.

In October 2014, OPCo filed a separate application with the PUCO to propose a new extended PPA for inclusion in the PPA rider, discussed above. The new PPA would include an additional 2,671 MW to be purchased from AGR over the life of the respective generating units.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings” section of Note 4 .

2012 Texas Base Rate Case

Upon rehearing in January 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, SWEPCo reversed $114 million of previously recorded regulatory disallowances.  The resulting annual base rate increase is approximately $52 million.  In May 2014, intervenors filed appeals of the order with the Texas District Court.  In June 2014, SWEPCo intervened in those appeals and filed initial responses.  If certain parts of the PUCT order are overturned it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.  See the “2012 Texas Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 .

2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In 2012, SWEPCo initiated a proceeding to establish new formula base rates in Louisiana, including recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant. In February 2013, a settlement was approved by the LPSC that increased Louisiana total rates by approximately $2 million annually, effective March 2013. The March 2013 base rates are based upon a 10% return on common equity and cost recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant and Stall Unit, subject to refund. The settlement also provided that the LPSC will review base rates in 2014 and 2015 and that SWEPCo will recover non-fuel Turk Plant costs and a full weighted-average cost of capital return on the prudently incurred Turk Plant investment in jurisdictional rate base, effective January 2013. In December 2014, the LPSC approved a settlement agreement related to the staff review of the cost of service. The settlement agreement reduced the requested revenue increase by $3 million, primarily due to the timing of both the allowed recovery of certain existing regulatory assets and the establishment of a regulatory asset for certain previously expensed costs. See the “2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing” section of Note 4 .

2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In January 2014, PSO filed a request with the OCC to increase annual base rates by $38 million, based upon a 10.5% return on common equity. This revenue increase included a proposed increase in depreciation rates of $29 million. In addition, the filing proposed recovery of advanced metering costs through a separate rider over a three-year deployment period requesting $7 million of revenues in year one, increasing to $28 million in year three. The filing also proposed expansion of an existing transmission rider currently recovered in base rates to include additional transmission-related costs that are expected to increase over the next several years.

5


In June 2014, a non-unanimous stipulation agreement between PSO, the OCC staff and certain intervenors was filed with the OCC. The parties to the stipulation recommended no overall change to the transmission rider or to annual revenues, other than additional revenues through a separate rider related to advanced metering costs, and that the terms of the stipulation be effective November 2014. The advanced metering rider would provide $24 million of revenues over 14 months beginning in November 2014 and increase to $27 million in 2016. New depreciation rates are recommended for advanced metering investments and existing meters, also to be effective November 2014. Additionally, the stipulation recommends recovery of regulatory assets for 2013 storms and regulatory case expenses. In July 2014, the Attorney General joined in the stipulation agreement. In October 2014, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommended approval of the stipulation agreement and interim rates were implemented in November 2014, subject to refund. In November 2014, intervenors filed exceptions to the ALJ's report. An order is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015. If the OCC were to disallow any portion of this settlement agreement, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 .

2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case

In March 2014, APCo filed a biennial generation and distribution base rate case with the Virginia SCC. In accordance with a Virginia statute, APCo did not request an increase in base rates as its Virginia retail combined rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013 was within the statutory range of the approved return on common equity of 10.9%. The filing included a request to decrease generation depreciation rates, effective February 2015, primarily due to the change in the expected service life of certain plants. Additionally, the filing included a request to amortize $7 million annually for two years, beginning February 2015, related to IGCC and other deferred costs. APCo also requested approval to amortize $38 million related to an accumulated deferred Virginia state income tax (ADVSIT) liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015.

In November 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order concluding that APCo's adjusted earned rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013, reflecting their ordered adjustments, was above the allowed threshold. The order included (a) a $6 million refund to customers for the years 2012 through 2013, (b) the write-off of $10 million of IGCC pre-construction costs, (c) approval to amortize a $38 million ADVSIT liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015 and (d) no change to generation depreciation rates with rates to be reviewed again in the next biennial rate case. The order also approved a new return on common equity of 9.7% effective for 2014 and 2015. The Virginia SCC did not rule on a Virginia SCC staff recommendation to write-down certain costs, for ratemaking purposes, for the biennial period based on APCo’s earnings within the statutory equity range. In January 2015, the Virginia SCC initiated a separate proceeding to address the proper treatment of APCo’s authorized regulatory assets. If any of these costs, or any additional costs that may be subject to review, are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 .

Potential New Virginia Legislation Affecting Biennial Reviews

In February 2015, amendments to Virginia law governing the regulation of investor-owned electric utilities were approved by the Virginia General Assembly and have been sent to the Governor. If these amendments are enacted, APCo’s existing generation and distribution base rates would freeze until after the Virginia SCC rules on APCo’s next biennial review, which APCo would file in March 2020 for the 2018 and 2019 test years. These amendments would also preclude the Virginia SCC from performing biennial reviews of APCo’s earnings for the years 2014 through 2017. Management continues to monitor this potential new legislation in Virginia.

2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case

In June 2014, APCo filed a request with the WVPSC to increase annual base rates by $181 million, based upon a 10.62% return on common equity, to be effective in the second quarter of 2015.  The filing included a request to increase generation depreciation rates primarily due to the increase in plant investment and changes in the expected service lives of various generating units.  The filing also requested recovery of $89 million over five years related to 2012 West Virginia storm costs, IGCC and other deferred costs.  In addition to the base rate request, the filing also included a request to implement a rider of approximately $45 million annually to recover vegetation management costs, including

6


a return on capital investment.  In December 2014 and January 2015, intervenors filed testimony which proposed total annual revenue increases ranging from $35 million to $59 million based upon returns on common equity ranging from 9% to 10% and regulatory asset disallowances ranging from $7 million to $9 million.  Additionally, other intervenors proposed that the revenue requirement be based on a return on common equity of 8.7% and that $89 million of regulatory assets be disallowed.  Intervenors also recommended a disallowance of approximately $44 million related to the December 2013 transfer of OPCo's two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo.  Hearings at the WVPSC were held in January 2015.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 .

Plant Transfer

APCo and WPCo provide retail electric service at bundled rates approved by the WVPSC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis, to their respective customers. West Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through an expanded net energy cost which trues-up to actual expenses. In March 2014, APCo and WPCo filed a request with the WVPSC for approval to transfer at net book value to WPCo a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, comprising 780 MW of average annual generating capacity presently owned by AGR. In April 2014, APCo and WPCo filed testimony that supported their request and proposed a base rate surcharge of $113 million, to be offset by an equal reduction in the ENEC revenues, to be effective upon the transfer of the Mitchell Plant to WPCo. In June 2014, the FERC issued an order approving a request by AGR and WPCo to transfer AGR’s one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo.

In October 2014, a stipulation agreement between APCo, WPCo, the WVPSC staff and intervenors in the case was filed with the WVPSC. The stipulation agreement recommended approval for WPCo to acquire, at net book value, the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, excluding certain assets, and to pay AGR $20 million upon transfer, which WPCo will record as a regulatory asset, include in rate base and recover over the life of the plant. Additionally, the agreement stated that 82.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest will be reflected in rates effective from the date of the transfer via a surcharge with an offset in ENEC revenues of $93 million. The remaining 17.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest is to be included in rates by January 2020. The agreement also proposed that WPCo share the energy margins for 82.5% of the plant’s output with ratepayers and that WPCo retain all of the energy margins from sales into the wholesale market on the remaining 17.5%, to offset fixed costs associated with this portion, until the remaining portion is included in rates. In December 2014, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications related to 82.5% of the energy and capacity margin sharing. The WVPSC determined that the sharing mechanism that was proposed is reasonable and will be adopted provided the result of the sharing mechanism will be adjusted, if necessary, so that the sharing mechanism does not result in a net cost to ratepayers that exceeds the actual variable cost of generation. In January 2015, the transfer of the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo was completed. See the “Plant Transfer” section of APCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .

Kentucky Fuel Adjustment Clause Review

In August 2014, the KPSC issued an order initiating a review of KPCo's FAC from November 2013 through April 2014. In January 2015, the KPSC issued an order disallowing certain FAC costs during the period of January 2014 through May 2015 while KPCo owns and operates both Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 and its one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant. Additionally, the KPSC directed KPCo to refund to customers $13 million of fuel costs, by the end of the second quarter of 2015, collected during the FAC review period of January 2014 through April 2014. As a result of this order, KPCo recorded a regulatory disallowance of $36 million in December 2014. In February 2015, KPCo filed an appeal of this order with the Franklin County Circuit Court.


7


2014 Kentucky Base Rate Case

In December 2014, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC for an increase in rates of $70 million, which consists of a $75 million increase in rider rates, offset by a $5 million decrease in annual base rates, to be effective July 2015. The net increase reflects KPCo's ownership interest in the Mitchell Plant, riders to recover the Big Sandy Plant retirement and operational costs and the inclusion of an environmental compliance plan related to the Mitchell Plant FGD. Additionally, the filing included a request to recover deferred storm costs. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

PJM Capacity Auction

AGR is required to offer all of its available generation capacity in the PJM RPM auction, which is conducted three years in advance of the actual delivery year.

Through May 2015, AGR will provide generation capacity to OPCo for both switched and non-switched OPCo generation customers.  For switched customers, OPCo pays AGR $188.88/MW day for capacity.  For non-switched OPCo generation customers, OPCo pays AGR its blended tariff rate for capacity consisting of $188.88/MW day for auctioned load and the non-fuel generation portion of its base rate for non-auctioned load.  AGR’s excess capacity is subject to the PJM RPM auction. After May 2015, AGR's generation assets will be subject to PJM capacity prices.  Shown below are the current auction prices for capacity, as announced/settled by PJM:
 
 
PJM Base
PJM Auction Period
 
Auction Price
 
 
(per MW day)
June 2013 through May 2014
 
$
27.73

June 2014 through May 2015
 
125.99

June 2015 through May 2016
 
136.00

June 2016 through May 2017

59.37

June 2017 through May 2018
 
120.00


We expect a significant decline in AGR capacity revenues after May 2015 when the Power Supply Agreement between AGR and OPCo ends. We expect a further decline in AGR capacity revenues from June 2016 through May 2017 based upon the decrease in the PJM base auction price.

In conjunction with other utility companies, we continue to address mutual concerns related to the PJM capacity auction process. Through this advocacy effort, the FERC has accepted PJM recommendations which should have the impact of reducing capacity price volatility beginning in the June 2018 time period.

In December 2014, PJM filed with FERC for approval of a new type of capacity product, the Capacity Performance Product. The intent of the filing is to raise the level of capacity performance and reliability during emergency events by: (a) assessing higher penalties for non-performance during these events, (b) allowing higher price offers into the auction and (c) requiring generating units to provide fuel and operational assurances that they can perform reliably during emergency events.

In this same filing, PJM proposed with FERC supplemental capacity auctions for the June 2016 through May 2017 and June 2017 through May 2018 auction periods. These supplemental auctions would address capacity performance and reliability issues in these interim years, and if accepted, would allow AGR to re-offer at least part of the capacity already cleared for these years at a higher price. A FERC order is expected in the first half of 2015.


8


Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 - Environmental Projects

To comply with pending Federal EPA regulations, SWEPCo is currently constructing environmental control projects to meet mercury and air toxics standards for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 at a cost of approximately $410 million, excluding AFUDC. Management currently estimates that the total environmental projects to be completed through 2020 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 will cost approximately $600 million, excluding AFUDC. As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has incurred costs of $164 million and has remaining contractual construction obligations of $108 million related to these projects.  SWEPCo will seek recovery of these project costs from customers through filings at the state commissions and the FERC. See "Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy" section of “Environmental Issues” below.  As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $388 million, before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.   

LITIGATION

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, we cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  We assess the probability of loss for each contingency and accrue a liability for cases that have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on our regulatory proceedings and pending litigation see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Rockport Plant Litigation

In July 2013, the Wilmington Trust Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against AEGCo and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened by the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiff further alleges that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiff.  The New York court has granted our motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M. In January 2015, the court issued an opinion and order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. The court dismissed certain of the plaintiffs’ claims. Several claims remain, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  We will continue to defend against the remaining claims.  We are unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

We are implementing a substantial capital investment program and incurring additional operational costs to comply with environmental control requirements.  We will need to make additional investments and operational changes in response to existing and anticipated requirements such as CAA requirements to reduce emissions of SO 2 , NO x , PM and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from fossil fuel-fired power plants, proposals governing the beneficial use and disposal of coal combustion products, proposed clean water rules and renewal permits for certain water discharges that are currently under appeal.

We are engaged in litigation about environmental issues, have been notified of potential responsibility for the clean-up of contaminated sites and incur costs for disposal of SNF and future decommissioning of our nuclear units.  We, along with various industry groups, affected states and other parties have challenged some of the Federal EPA requirements in court.  We are also engaged in the development of future requirements including the items discussed below and reductions of CO 2 emissions to address concerns about global climate change.  We believe that further analysis and better coordination of these environmental requirements would facilitate planning and lower overall compliance costs while achieving the same environmental goals.

9


We will seek recovery of expenditures for pollution control technologies and associated costs from customers through rates in regulated jurisdictions.  Environmental rules could result in accelerated depreciation, impairment of assets or regulatory disallowances.  If we are unable to recover the costs of environmental compliance, it would reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.
 
Environmental Controls Impact on the Generating Fleet

The rules and proposed environmental controls discussed in the next several sections will have a material impact on the generating units in the AEP System.  We continue to evaluate the impact of these rules, project scope and technology available to achieve compliance.  As of December 31, 2014 , the AEP System had a total generating capacity of nearly 37,600 MWs, of which over 23,700 MWs are coal-fired.  We continue to refine the cost estimates of complying with these rules and other impacts of the environmental proposals on our coal-fired generating facilities.  Based upon our estimates, additional investment to meet these proposed requirements ranges from approximately $2.8 billion to $3.3 billion through 2020.  These amounts include investments to convert some of our coal generation to natural gas.  If natural gas conversion is not completed, these units could be retired sooner than planned.

The cost estimates will change depending on the timing of implementation and whether the Federal EPA provides flexibility in the final rules.  The cost estimates will also change based on: (a) the states’ implementation of these regulatory programs, including the potential for state implementation plans (SIPs) or federal implementation plans (FIPs) that impose more stringent standards, (b) additional rulemaking activities in response to court decisions, (c) the actual performance of the pollution control technologies installed on our units, (d) changes in costs for new pollution controls, (e) new generating technology developments, (f) total MWs of capacity retired and replaced, including the type and amount of such replacement capacity and (g) other factors.  In addition, we are continuing to evaluate the economic feasibility of environmental investments on nonregulated plants.

Subject to the factors listed above and based upon our continuing evaluation, we intend to retire the following plants or units of plants before or during 2016:
Company
 
Plant Name and Unit
 
Generating
Capacity
 
 
 
 
(in MWs)
AGR
 
Kammer Plant
 
630

AGR
 
Muskingum River Plant
 
1,440

AGR
 
Picway Plant
 
100

APCo
 
Clinch River Plant, Unit 3
 
235

APCo
 
Glen Lyn Plant
 
335

APCo
 
Kanawha River Plant
 
400

APCo/AGR
 
Sporn Plant
 
600

I&M
 
Tanners Creek Plant
 
995

KPCo
 
Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2
 
800

PSO
 
Northeastern Station, Unit 4
 
470

SWEPCo
 
Welsh Plant, Unit 2
 
528

Total
 
 
 
6,533


As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of the AGR units listed above was zero.  The net book value, before cost of removal, including related material and supplies inventory and CWIP balances, of the regulated plants in the table above was $980 million.  See Note 5 for further discussion.

In addition, we are in the process of obtaining permits following the KPSC's approval for the conversion of KPCo's 278 MW Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 to natural gas. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value, before cost of removal, including related material and supplies inventory and CWIP balances of Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 was $114 million.


10


Volatility in fuel prices, pending environmental rules and other market factors could also have an adverse impact on the accounting evaluation of the recoverability of the net book values of coal-fired units.  For regulated plants that we may close early, we are seeking regulatory recovery of remaining net book values.  To the extent the book value of existing generation assets and the cost of new equipment and converted facilities are not recoverable, it could materially reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Clean Air Act Requirements

The CAA establishes a comprehensive program to protect and improve the nation’s air quality and control sources of air emissions.  The states implement and administer many of these programs and could impose additional or more stringent requirements.
 
The Federal EPA issued the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) in 2005 requiring specific reductions in SO 2 and NO x emissions from power plants.  The Federal EPA issued the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) in August 2011 to replace CAIR.  The CSAPR was challenged in the courts.  In 2012, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision vacating and remanding CSAPR to the Federal EPA with instructions to continue implementing CAIR until a replacement rule is finalized.  That decision was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reversed the decision and remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  All of the states in which our power plants are located are covered by CSAPR. See "Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)" section below.

The Federal EPA issued the final maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for coal and oil-fired power plants in 2012. See “Mercury and Other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Regulation” section below.

The Federal EPA issued a Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR), detailing how the CAA’s requirement that certain facilities install best available retrofit technology (BART) to address regional haze in federal parks and other protected areas.  BART requirements apply to facilities built between 1962 and 1977 that emit more than 250 tons per year of certain pollutants in specific industrial categories, including power plants.  CAVR will be implemented through SIPs or, if SIPs are not adequate or are not developed on schedule, through FIPs.  The Federal EPA proposed disapproval of SIPs in a few states, including Arkansas.  Arkansas is developing a revised submittal.  In June 2012, the Federal EPA published revisions to the regional haze rules to allow states participating in the CSAPR trading programs to use those programs in place of source-specific BART for SO 2 and NO x emissions based on its determination that CSAPR results in greater visibility improvements than source-specific BART in the CSAPR states.  This rule is being challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

In 2009, the Federal EPA issued a final mandatory reporting rule for CO 2 and other greenhouse gases covering a broad range of facilities emitting in excess of 25,000 tons of CO 2 emissions per year.   The Federal EPA issued a final endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles in 2009.  The Federal EPA determined that greenhouse gas   emissions from stationary sources will be subject to regulation under the CAA beginning January 2011 and finalized its proposed scheme to streamline and phase-in regulation of stationary source CO 2 emissions through the NSR prevention of significant deterioration and Title V operating permit programs through the issuance of final federal rules, SIP calls and FIPs.  The Federal EPA has proposed to include CO 2 emissions in standards that apply to new and existing electric utility units. See "Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy" section below.

The Federal EPA has also issued final, more stringent national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM, SO 2 and proposed a more stringent NAAQS for ozone.  States are in the process of evaluating the attainment status and need for additional control measures in order to attain and maintain the new NAAQS and may develop additional requirements for our facilities as a result of those evaluations.  We cannot currently predict the nature, stringency or timing of those requirements.

Notable developments in significant CAA regulatory requirements affecting our operations are discussed in the following sections.

11


Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)

In 2011, the Federal EPA issued CSAPR.  Certain revisions to the rule were finalized in 2012.  CSAPR relies on newly-created SO 2 and NO x allowances and individual state budgets to compel further emission reductions from electric utility generating units in 28 states.  Interstate trading of allowances is allowed on a restricted sub-regional basis.  Arkansas and Louisiana are subject only to the seasonal NO x program in the rule.  Texas is subject to the annual programs for SO 2 and NO x in addition to the seasonal NO x program.  The annual SO 2 allowance budgets in Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia were reduced significantly in the rule.  A supplemental rule includes Oklahoma in the seasonal NO x program.  The supplemental rule was finalized in December 2011 with an increased NO x emission budget for the 2012 compliance year.  The Federal EPA issued a final Error Corrections Rule and further CSAPR revisions in 2012 to make corrections to state budgets and unit allocations and to remove the restrictions on interstate trading in the first phase of CSAPR.
 
Numerous affected entities, states and other parties filed petitions to review the CSAPR in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  In 2012, the court issued a decision vacating and remanding CSAPR to the Federal EPA with instructions to continue implementing the CAIR until a replacement rule is finalized.  The majority determined that the CAA does not allow the Federal EPA to “overcontrol” emissions in an upwind state and that the Federal EPA exceeded its statutory authority by failing to allow states an opportunity to develop their own implementation plans before issuing a FIP.  The petition for review filed by the Federal EPA and other parties in the U.S. Supreme Court was granted in June 2013. In April 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision reversing in part the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. The Federal EPA filed a motion to lift the stay and allow Phase I of CSAPR to take effect on January 1, 2015 and Phase II to take effect on January 1, 2017. The court granted the Federal EPA's motion, established a briefing schedule and scheduled oral argument for March 2015 on the remaining issues. Separate appeals of the Error Corrections Rule and the further revisions have been filed but no briefing schedules have been established. We cannot predict the outcome of the pending litigation.

Mercury and Other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Regulation

In 2012, the Federal EPA issued a rule addressing a broad range of HAPs from coal and oil-fired power plants.  The rule establishes unit-specific emission rates for mercury, PM (as a surrogate for particles of nonmercury metals) and hydrogen chloride (as a surrogate for acid gases) for units burning coal on a site-wide 30-day rolling average basis.  In addition, the rule proposes work practice standards, such as boiler tune-ups, for controlling emissions of organic HAPs and dioxin/furans.  The effective date of the final rule was April 16, 2012 and compliance is required within three years.  Petitions for administrative reconsideration and judicial review were filed.  In 2012, the Federal EPA published a notice announcing that it would accept comments on its reconsideration of certain issues related to the new source standards, including clarification of the requirements that apply during periods of start-up and shut down, measurement issues and the application of variability factors that may have an impact on the level of the standards.  The Federal EPA issued revisions to the new source standards consistent with the proposed rule, except the start-up and shut down provisions in March 2013.  The Federal EPA is still considering additional changes to the start-up and shut down provisions. In April 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied all of the petitions for review of the April 2012 final rule. Industry trade groups and several states filed petitions for further review in the U.S. Supreme Court and the court granted those petitions in November 2014.

The final rule contains a slightly less stringent PM limit for existing sources than the original proposal and allows operators to exclude periods of start-up and shut down from the emissions averaging periods.  We have obtained a one-year administrative extension at several units to facilitate the installation of controls or to avoid a serious reliability problem.  In addition, the Federal EPA issued an enforcement policy describing the circumstances under which an administrative consent order might be issued to provide a fifth year for the installation of controls or completion of reliability upgrades.  We remain concerned about the availability of compliance extensions, the inability to foreclose citizen suits being filed under the CAA for failure to achieve compliance by the required deadlines and the lack of coordination among the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards schedule and other environmental requirements.


12


Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy

National public policy makers and regulators in the 11 states we serve have diverse views on climate change, carbon regulation and energy policy.  We are currently focused on responding to these emerging views with prudent actions across a range of plausible scenarios and outcomes.  We are active participants in both state and federal policy development to assure that any proposed new requirements are feasible and the economies of the states we serve are not placed at a competitive disadvantage.

Several states have adopted programs that directly regulate CO 2 emissions from power plants.  The majority of the states where we have generating facilities have passed legislation establishing renewable energy, alternative energy and/or energy efficiency requirements that can assist in reducing carbon emissions.  We are taking steps to comply with these requirements, including increasing our wind power purchases and broadening our portfolio of energy efficiency programs.

We estimate that our 2014 emissions were approximately 120 million metric tons.  This represents a reduction of 18% compared to our 2005 CO 2  emissions of approximately 146 million metric tons.

In the absence of comprehensive federal climate change or energy policy legislation, President Obama issued a memorandum to the Administrator of the Federal EPA directing the agency to develop and issue a new proposal regulating carbon emissions from new electric generating units under the CAA.  The new proposal was issued in September 2013 and requires new large natural gas units to meet a limit of 1,000 pounds of CO 2 per MWh of electricity generated and small natural gas units to meet a limit of 1,100 pounds of CO 2 per MWh.  New coal-fired units are required to meet a limit of 1,100 pounds of CO 2 per MWh, with the option to meet a 1,000 pound per MWh limit if they choose to average emissions over multiple years.  This proposal was published in the Federal Register in January 2014 and the comment period has closed.

The Federal EPA was also directed to develop and issue a separate proposal regulating carbon emissions from modified and reconstructed electric generating units (EGUs) and to issue guidelines for existing EGUs before June 2014, to finalize those standards by June 2015 and to require states to submit revisions to their implementation plans including such standards no later than June 2016. The Federal EPA issued guidelines for the development of standards for existing sources in June 2014. The guidelines use a “portfolio” approach to reducing emissions from existing sources that includes efficiency improvements at coal plants, displacing coal-fired generation with increased utilization of natural gas combined cycle units, expanding renewable generation resources and increasing customer energy efficiency. Comments were due in December 2014. The Federal EPA also issued proposed regulations governing emissions of CO 2 from modified and reconstructed EGUs in June 2014 and comments were due in October 2014. The standards for modified and reconstructed units include several options, including use of historic baselines or energy efficiency audits to establish source-specific CO 2 emission rates or to limit CO 2 emission rates which could be no less than 1,900 pounds per MWh at larger coal units and 2,100 pounds per MWh at smaller coal units. The Federal EPA announced in January 2015 that the schedule for finalizing its action on all of these standards will extend into the summer of 2015 and that it will develop and propose for public comment a model FIP that will be finalized for individual states that fail to submit a timely state plan to implement the existing source standards. We cannot currently predict the impact these programs may have on future resource plans or our existing generating fleet, but the costs may be substantial.

In 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision upholding, in all material respects, the Federal EPA’s endangerment finding, its regulatory program for CO 2 emissions from new motor vehicles and its plan to phase in regulation of CO 2 emissions from stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V operating permit programs. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Federal EPA was not compelled to regulate CO 2 emissions from stationary sources under the Title V or PSD programs as a result of its adoption of the motor vehicle standards, but that sources otherwise required to obtain a PSD permit may be required to perform a Best Available Control Technology analysis for CO 2 emissions if they exceed a reasonable level. The Federal EPA must undertake additional rulemaking to implement the court’s decision and establish an appropriate level.


13


Federal and state legislation or regulations that mandate limits on the emission of CO 2 could result in significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs, which in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs.  Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might force our utility subsidiaries to close some coal-fired facilities and could lead to possible impairment of assets.  Public perception may ultimately have a significant impact on future legislation and regulation.

To the extent climate change affects a region’s economic health, it could also affect our revenues.  Our financial performance is tied to the health of the regional economies we serve.  The price of energy, as a factor in a region's cost of living as well as an important input into the cost of goods, has an impact on the economic health of our communities.  The cost of additional regulatory requirements would normally be borne by consumers through higher prices for energy and purchased goods.

Coal Combustion Residual Rule

In 2010, the Federal EPA published a proposed rule to regulate the disposal and beneficial re-use of coal combustion residuals (CCR), including fly ash and bottom ash generated at coal-fired electric generating units and also FGD gypsum generated at some coal-fired plants.  The proposed rule contained two alternative proposals.  One proposal would impose federal hazardous waste disposal and management standards on these materials and another would allow states to retain primary authority to regulate the beneficial re-use and disposal of these materials under state solid waste management standards, including minimum federal standards for disposal and management.  Both proposals would impose stringent requirements for the construction of new coal ash landfills and existing unlined surface impoundments.

Various environmental organizations and industry groups filed a petition seeking to establish deadlines for a final rule.  To comply with a court-ordered deadline, the Federal EPA issued a prepublication copy of its final rule in December 2014. The rule is expected to be published in the Federal Register during the first quarter of 2015 and become effective six months following publication.

In the final rule, the Federal EPA elected to regulate CCR as a non-hazardous solid waste and issued new minimum federal solid waste management standards. On the effective date, the rule applies to new and existing active CCR landfills and CCR surface impoundments at operating electric utility or independent power production facilities. The rule imposes new and additional construction and operating obligations, including location restrictions, liner criteria, structural integrity requirements for impoundments, operating criteria and additional groundwater monitoring requirements. The rule does not apply to inactive CCR landfills and inactive surface impoundments at retired generating stations or the beneficial use of CCR. The rule is self-implementing so state action is not required. Because of this self-implementing feature, the rule contains extensive record keeping, notice and internet posting requirements. Because we currently use surface impoundments and landfills to manage CCR materials at our generating facilities, we will incur significant costs to upgrade or close and replace these existing facilities at some point in the future as the new rule is implemented. We continue to review the new rule and evaluate its costs and impacts to our operations, including ongoing monitoring requirements.

In February 2014, the Federal EPA completed a risk evaluation of the beneficial uses of coal fly ash in concrete and FGD gypsum in wallboard and concluded that the Federal EPA supports these beneficial uses.  Currently, approximately 40% of the coal ash and other residual products from our generating facilities are re-used in the production of cement and wallboard, as structural fill or soil amendments, as abrasives or road treatment materials and for other beneficial uses.  Encapsulated beneficial uses are not materially impacted by the new rule but additional demonstrations may be required to continue land applications in significant amounts except in road construction projects.


14


Clean Water Act (CWA) Regulations

In 2014, the Federal EPA issued a final rule setting forth standards for existing power plants that is intended to reduce mortality of aquatic organisms pinned against a plant’s cooling water intake screen (impingement) or entrained in the cooling water.  Entrainment is when small fish, eggs or larvae are drawn into the cooling water system and affected by heat, chemicals or physical stress.  The final rule affects all plants withdrawing more than two million gallons of cooling water per day. The rule offers seven technology options to comply with the impingement standard and requires site-specific studies to determine appropriate entrainment compliance measures at facilities withdrawing more than 125 million gallons per day. Additional requirements may be imposed as a result of consultation with other federal agencies to protect threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Facilities with existing closed cycle recirculating cooling systems, as defined in the rule, are not expected to require any technology changes. Facilities subject to both the impingement standard and site-specific entrainment studies will typically be given at least three years to conduct and submit the results of those studies to the permit agency. Compliance timeframes will then be established by the permit agency through each facility’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for installation of any required technology changes, as those permits are renewed over the next five to eight years. Petitions for review of the final rule have been filed by industry and environmental groups and are currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

In addition, the Federal EPA issued an information collection request and is developing revised effluent limitation guidelines for electricity generating facilities.  A proposed rule was signed in April 2013 with a final rule expected in September 2015.  The Federal EPA proposed eight options of increasing stringency and cost for fly ash and bottom ash transport water, scrubber wastewater, leachate from coal combustion byproduct landfills and impoundments and other wastewaters associated with coal-fired generating units, with four labeled preferred options.  Certain of the Federal EPA's preferred options have already been implemented or are part of our long-term plans.  We continue to review the proposal in detail to evaluate whether our plants are currently meeting the proposed limitations, what technologies have been incorporated into our long-range plans and what additional costs might be incurred if the Federal EPA's most stringent options were adopted.  We submitted detailed comments to the Federal EPA in September 2013 and participated in comments filed by various organizations of which we are members.

In April 2014, the Federal EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly issued a proposed rule to clarify the scope of the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court cases and published the proposed rule in the Federal Register. The CWA provides for federal jurisdiction over “navigable waters” defined as “the waters of the United States.” This proposed jurisdictional definition will apply to all CWA programs, potentially impacting generation, transmission and distribution permitting and compliance requirements. Among those programs are: permits for wastewater and storm water discharges, permits for impacts to wetlands and water bodies and oil spill prevention planning. We agree that clarity and efficiency in the permitting process is needed. We are concerned that the proposed rule introduces new concepts and could subject more of our operations to CWA jurisdiction, thereby increasing the time and complexity of permitting. We submitted detailed comments to the Federal EPA in November 2014 and also participated in comments filed by various organizations of which we are members.

15


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SEGMENTS

Our primary business is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.  Within our Vertically Integrated Utilities segment, we centrally dispatch generation assets and manage our overall utility operations on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight.  Intersegment sales and transfers are generally based on underlying contractual arrangements and agreements.

Our reportable segments and their related business activities are outlined below:

Vertically Integrated Utilities

Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.

Transmission and Distribution Utilities

Transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCo, TCC and TNC.
OPCo purchases energy to serve SSO customers, and provides capacity for all connected load.

AEP Transmission Holdco

Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in our wholly-owned transmission subsidiaries and transmission only joint ventures. These investments have PUCT-approved or FERC-approved returns on equity.

Generation & Marketing

Nonregulated generation in ERCOT and PJM.
Marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, PJM and MISO.

AEP River Operations

Commercial barging operations that transports liquids, coal and dry bulk commodities primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi Rivers.


16


The table below presents Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
$
708

 
$
677

 
$
800

Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
355

 
358

 
389

AEP Transmission Holdco
 
151

 
80

 
43

Generation & Marketing
 
367

 
228

 
100

AEP River Operations
 
49

 
12

 
15

Corporate and Other (a)
 
4

 
125

 
(88
)
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
1,634

 
$
1,480

 
$
1,259


(a)
While not considered a reportable segment, Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries. This segment also includes Parent's guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense and other nonallocated costs.

AEP CONSOLIDATED

2014 Compared to 2013

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders increased from $1,480 million in 2013 to $1,634 million in 2014 primarily due to:

Impairments during 2013 for the following:
Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
A decision from the KPSC disallowing scrubber costs on KPCo's Big Sandy Plant.
A net increase in weather-related usage.
Higher market prices and increased sales volumes.
An increase in transmission investment which resulted in higher revenues and income.
Successful rate proceedings during 2014 in our various jurisdictions.

These increases were partially offset by:

A favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013.
An increase in depreciation expense due to increased investments.
An increase in regulatory provisions in 2014.
An increase in fuel expense due to the termination of a long-term coal contract.
An increase in plant maintenance.
An increase in vegetation management expenses.


17


2013 Compared to 2012

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders increased from $1,259 million in 2012 to $1,480 million in 2013 primarily due to:

Successful rate proceedings in our various jurisdictions.
2012 impairments of certain Ohio generation plants.
A decrease in Ohio depreciation expense due to impairments of certain Ohio generation plants.
A favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013.

These increases were partially offset by:

Impairments during 2013 for the following:
Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
A write-off from a disallowance of a portion of Amos Plant, Unit 3 pursuant to a Virginia SCC order.
A decision from the KPSC disallowing scrubber costs on KPCo's Big Sandy Plant.
The loss of retail generation customers in Ohio to various CRES providers.
2012 reversal of a 2011 recorded obligation to contribute to Partnership with Ohio and Ohio Growth Fund as a result of the PUCO's February 2012 rejection of OPCo's modified stipulation.

Our results of operations by operating segment are discussed below.

VERTICALLY INTEGRATED UTILITIES
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Revenues
 
$
9,484

 
$
9,992

 
$
9,418

Fuel and Purchased Electricity
 
3,953

 
4,770

 
4,408

Gross Margin
 
5,531

 
5,222

 
5,010

Other Operation and Maintenance
 
2,515

 
2,276

 
2,219

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
72

 
13

Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,033

 
941

 
873

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
370

 
372

 
344

Operating Income
 
1,613

 
1,561

 
1,561

Interest and Investment Income
 
4

 
7

 
5

Carrying Costs Income
 
6

 
14

 
28

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
47

 
35

 
72

Interest Expense
 
(526
)
 
(540
)
 
(520
)
Income Before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings
 
1,144

 
1,077

 
1,146

Income Tax Expense
 
434

 
398

 
345

Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
2

 
2

 
2

Net Income
 
712

 
681

 
803

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 
4

 
3

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
708

 
$
677

 
$
800


18


Summary of KWh Energy Sales for Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
(in millions of KWhs)
 
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
34,073

 
33,851

 
33,199

 
Commercial
 
25,048

 
25,037

 
25,278

 
Industrial
 
35,281

 
34,216

 
34,692

 
Miscellaneous
 
2,311

 
2,284

 
2,356

 
Total Retail
 
96,713

 
95,388

 
95,525

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale (a)
 
34,241

 
NM

(b)
NM

(b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
 
130,954

 
95,388

 
95,525

 

(a)
Includes off-system sales, municipalities and cooperatives, unit power and other wholesale customers.
(b)
2014 is not comparable to 2013 or 2012 due to the 2013 asset transfers related to corporate separation in Ohio on December 31, 2013 and the termination of the Interconnection Agreement effective January 1, 2014.
NM    Not meaningful.

Cooling degree days and heating degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.  In general, degree day changes in our eastern region have a larger effect on net income than changes in our western region due to the relative size of the two regions and the number of customers within each region.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days for Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in degree days)
Eastern Region
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Heating (a)
 
3,313

 
2,949

 
2,216

Normal – Heating (b)
 
2,740

 
2,734

 
2,774

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Cooling (c)
 
932

 
1,040

 
1,253

Normal – Cooling (b)
 
1,080

 
1,080

 
1,079

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Western Region
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Heating (a)
 
1,840

 
1,772

 
1,070

Normal – Heating (b)
 
1,510

 
1,501

 
1,537

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Cooling (c)
 
2,049

 
2,163

 
2,635

Normal – Cooling (b)
 
2,203

 
2,202

 
2,186


(a)
Eastern Region and Western Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Eastern Region and Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.

19


2014 Compared to 2013
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Vertically Integrated Utilities
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
677

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
212

Off-system Sales
 
123

Transmission Revenues
 
22

Other Revenues
 
(48
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
309

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(239
)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
72

Depreciation and Amortization
 
(92
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
2

Interest and Investment Income
 
(3
)
Carrying Costs Income
 
(8
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
12

Interest Expense
 
14

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(242
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(36
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
708


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:
Retail Margins  increased $212 million primarily due to the following:

The effect of successful rate proceedings in our service territories, which include:
 
 
A $129 million rate increase for APCo.
 
 
A $55 million rate increase for KPCo.
 
 
A $45 million rate increase for I&M.
 
 
A $22 million rate increase for SWEPCo.
 
 
A $12 million rate increase for PSO.
 
 
A $9 million rate increase for WPCo.
 
For the rate increases described above, $153 million relates to riders/trackers which have corresponding increases in other expense items below.
 
A $14 million increase due to favorable weather conditions.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $43 million increase in PJM expenses net of recovery or offsets.
 
A $36 million decrease due to a fuel proceeding disallowance.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $123 million primarily due to higher market prices and changes in margin sharing.
Transmission Revenues  increased $22 million primarily due to increased investment in the PJM region.
Other Revenues  decreased $48 million primarily due to a decrease in barging because River Transportation Division (RTD) is no longer serving plants transferred from OPCo to AGR as of December 31, 2013 as a result of corporate separation in Ohio. This decrease in RTD revenue has a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses for barging as discussed below.


20


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $239 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $56 million increase in recoverable expenses, primarily including PJM expenses, currently fully recovered in rate recovery riders/trackers, partially offset by RTD expenses for barging activities.
 
A $46 million increase in employee related expenses.
 
A $45 million increase in transmission services related to PJM and SPP services.
 
A $43 million increase in plant outage and maintenance expense primarily due to higher planned and advanced spending.
 
A $26 million increase in distribution and transmission vegetation management expenses primarily due to higher advanced spending.
 
A $25 million increase due to a favorable settlement of an insurance claim in the first quarter of 2013.
 
A $10 million increase due to the write-off of IGCC costs in Virginia.
 
An $8 million increase due to an accrual for future environmental remediation costs.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $30 million write-off in the first quarter of 2013 of previously deferred 2012 Virginia storm costs resulting from the 2013 enactment of a Virginia law.
 
A $23 million decrease in storm expense primarily in the APCo service territory.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $72 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $39 million decrease due to APCo's 2013 write-off from a regulatory disallowance of a portion of Amos Plant, Unit 3 pursuant to a Virginia SCC order approving the transfer of Amos Plant, Unit 3.
 
A $33 million decrease due to KPCo's 2013 write-off of scrubber costs on the Big Sandy Plant and other generation costs in accordance with the KPSC's October 2013 order.
Depreciation and Amortization  expenses increased $92 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Carrying Cost Income  decreased $8 million primarily due to the November 2013 securitization of the West Virginia ENEC deferral balance.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction  increased $12 million primarily due to increases in environmental construction and transmission projects.
Interest Expense  decreased $14 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $6 million decrease due to the retirement of KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes in the third quarter of 2013.
 
A $4 million decrease due to the redemption of I&M Senior Unsecured Notes in the fourth quarter of 2013.
 
A $4 million decrease due to rate approvals in Louisiana and Texas as well as an increase in the debt component of AFUDC due to increased transmission and environmental projects.
Income Tax Expense  increased $36 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income, the recording of state income tax adjustments and other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis, partially offset by the recording of federal income tax adjustments.


21


2013 Compared to 2012
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2012 to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Vertically Integrated Utilities
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
$
800

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
196

Off-system Sales
 
(26
)
Transmission Revenues
 
41

Other Revenues
 
1

Total Change in Gross Margin
 
212

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(57
)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
(59
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(68
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(28
)
Interest and Investment Income
 
2

Carrying Costs Income
 
(14
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(37
)
Interest Expense
 
(20
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(281
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(53
)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
(1
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
677


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:
Retail Margins  increased $196 million primarily due to the following:
 
Successful rate proceedings in our service territories, which include:
 
 
A $153 million rate increase for SWEPCo.
 
 
A $112 million rate increase for I&M.
 
 
A $9 million rate increase for APCo.
 
 
 
For the rate increases described above, $42 million relates to riders/trackers which have corresponding increases in other expense items below.
 
A $29 million increase in weather-related usage in our eastern and western regions primarily due to increases of 33% and 66%, respectively, in heating degree days, partially offset by decreases in our eastern and western regions of 17% and 18%, respectively, in cooling degree days.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $15 million decrease in SWEPCo's municipal and cooperative revenues primarily due to lower realizations from changes in sales volume mix.
 
A $23 million decrease due to lower weather normalized retail sales.
 
A $12 million increase in other variable electric generation expenses.
 
A $9 million deferral of APCo's additional wind purchase costs in 2012 as a result of the June 2012 Virginia SCC fuel factor order.
 
A $9 million decrease due to adjustments for previously disallowed environmental costs by the November 2011 Virginia SCC order subsequently determined in 2012 to be appropriate for recovery by the Supreme Court of Virginia.

22


Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $26 million primarily due to lower PJM capacity revenue, reduced trading and marketing margins, partially offset by higher prices and volumes.
Transmission Revenues  increased $41 million primarily due to increased investment in the PJM and SPP regions.  These increased revenues are partially offset by Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $57 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $33 million increase in recoverable PJM and other expenses currently recovered dollar-for-dollar in rate recovery riders/trackers.
 
A $30 million write-off in 2013 of previously deferred 2012 Virginia storm costs resulting from the 2013 enactment of a Virginia law.
 
A $22 million increase in storm-related expenses primarily in APCo's service territory.
 
A $21 million increase in plant outage expenses.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $26 million decrease due to expenses related to the 2012 sustainable cost reductions.
 
A $25 million decrease due to an agreement reached to settle an insurance claim in 2013.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges increased $59 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $39 million increase due to APCo's 2013 write-off from a regulatory disallowance of a portion of Amos Plant, Unit 3 pursuant to a Virginia SCC order approving the transfer of Amos Plant, Unit 3.
 
A $33 million increase due to KPCo's 2013 write-off of scrubber costs on the Big Sandy Plant and other generation costs in accordance with the KPSC's October 2013 order.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A 2012 write-off of an additional $13 million related to SWEPCo's expected Texas jurisdictional portion of the Turk Plant in excess of the Texas capital cost cap.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $68 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $40 million increase due to the Turk Plant being placed in service in December 2012.
 
A $26 million increase due to higher depreciable base and higher depreciation rates reflecting a change in Tanners Creek Plant's estimated life approved by the MPSC effective April 2012 and by the IURC effective March 2013.  The majority of the increase in depreciation for Tanners Creek Plant's life is offset within Gross Margin.
 
Overall higher depreciable property balances.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $13 million decrease in amortization as a result of the cessation of the Virginia Environmental and Reliability surcharge and the Virginia Environmental Rate Adjustment Clause in January 2013 and March 2013, respectively.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes  increased $28 million primarily due to increased property taxes as a result of increased capital investments.
Carrying Costs Income decreased $14 million primarily due to an increased recovery of Virginia environmental costs in new base rates as approved by the Virginia SCC in late January 2012 and decreased carrying charges related to the Dresden Plant.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $37 million primarily due to completed construction of the Turk Plant in December 2012.
Interest Expense  increased $20 million primarily due to a decrease in the debt component of AFUDC due to completed construction of the Turk Plant in December 2012, partially offset by lower average outstanding long-term debt balances and an increase in the debt component of AFUDC related to projects at the Cook Plant.
Income Tax Expense increased $53 million primarily due to the recording of federal and state income tax adjustments and other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis, partially offset by a decrease in pretax book income.


23


TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Revenues
 
$
4,814

 
$
4,478

 
$
4,818

Purchased Electricity
 
1,520

 
1,627

 
2,071

Amortization of Generation Deferrals
 
111

 

 

Gross Margin
 
3,183

 
2,851

 
2,747

Other Operation and Maintenance
 
1,276

 
1,003

 
911

Depreciation and Amortization
 
658

 
591

 
561

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
453

 
435

 
428

Operating Income
 
796

 
822

 
847

Interest and Investment Income
 
11

 
2

 
4

Carrying Costs Income
 
27

 
16

 
24

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
12

 
8

 
6

Interest Expense
 
(280
)
 
(292
)
 
(291
)
Income Before Income Tax Expense
 
566

 
556

 
590

Income Tax Expense
 
211

 
198

 
201

Net Income
 
355

 
358

 
389

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 

 

 

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
355

 
$
358

 
$
389

Summary of KWh Energy Sales for Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
(in millions of KWhs)
 
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 
26,209

 
25,531

 
25,581

 
Commercial
 
25,307

 
24,631

 
24,746

 
Industrial
 
21,830

 
22,668

 
24,902

 
Miscellaneous
 
713

 
710

 
716

 
Total Retail (a)
 
74,059

 
73,540

 
75,945

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale (b)
 
2,198

 
NM

(c)
NM

(c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
 
76,257

 
73,540

 
75,945

 

(a)
Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.
(b)
Ohio's contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold into PJM.
(c)
2014 is not comparable to 2013 or 2012 due to the 2013 asset transfers related to corporate separation in Ohio on December 31, 2013 and the termination of the Interconnection Agreement effective January 1, 2014.
NM    Not meaningful.


24


Cooling degree days and heating degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.  In general, degree day changes in our eastern region have a larger effect on net income than changes in our western region due to the relative size of the two regions and the number of customers within each region.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days for Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in degree days)
Eastern Region
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Heating (a)
 
3,734

 
3,383

 
2,610

Normal – Heating (b)
 
3,230

 
3,229

 
3,276

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Cooling (c)
 
949

 
1,029

 
1,248

Normal – Cooling (b)
 
960

 
954

 
948

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Western Region
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Heating (a)
 
428

 
368

 
177

Normal – Heating (b)
 
337

 
337

 
352

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual – Cooling (d)
 
2,553

 
2,737

 
3,100

Normal – Cooling (b)
 
2,618

 
2,608

 
2,584


(a)
Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
(d)
Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 70 degree temperature base.

25


2014 Compared to 2013
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission and Distribution Utilities
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
358

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
236

Off-System Sales
 
3

Transmission Revenues
 
71

Other Revenues
 
22

Total Change in Gross Margin
 
332

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(273
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(67
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(18
)
Interest and Investment Income
 
9

Carrying Costs Income
 
11

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
4

Interest Expense
 
12

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(322
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(13
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
355


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:
Retail Margins increased $236 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $106 million increase in revenues primarily associated with Ohio rate riders/trackers and PJM revenues, partially offset by regulatory provisions.  These increases have corresponding increases in expense items discussed below.
 
A $96 million increase in TCC and TNC revenues primarily due to the recovery of ERCOT transmission expenses which is offset in Other Operation and Maintenance below.
Transmission Revenues increased $71 million primarily due to:

A $58 million increase primarily due to increased transmission revenues from customers who have switched to alternative CRES providers, rate increases for customers in the PJM region and increased transmission investment. This increase in transmission revenues related to CRES providers primarily offsets lost revenues included in Retail Margins above.
 
A $14 million increase primarily due to increased transmission investment in ERCOT.
Other Revenues  increased $22 million primarily due to an increase in Texas securitization revenues which is offset in Depreciation and Amortization and Interest Expense below.


26


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $273 million primarily due to the following:

A $213 million increase in recoverable expenses, including PJM expenses, ERCOT expenses and the Ohio storm amortization, currently fully recovered in rate recovery riders/trackers.
 
A $19 million increase in expenses related to various distribution services as a result of advanced spending.

An $18 million increase in remitted Universal Service Fund (USF) surcharge payments to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This increase is offset by an increase in Retail Margins above.
 
A $9 million increase in vegetation management expenses primarily due to advanced spending.
Depreciation and Amortization  expenses increased $67 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $39 million increase in amortization related to OPCo and TCC securitizations, which are partially offset in Retail Margins and Other Revenues above.
 
A $28 million increase due to an increase in the depreciable base of transmission and distribution assets.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes  increased $18 million primarily due to increased property taxes.
Interest and Investment Income  increased $9 million primarily due to interest on affiliated notes resulting from corporate separation.
Carrying Costs Income  increased $11 million primarily due to increased capacity deferral carrying charges.
Interest Expense  decreased $12 million primarily due to reduced TCC securitization long-term debt outstanding, which is partially offset in Other Revenues above.
Income Tax Expense  increased $13 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and by the recording of federal and state income tax adjustments.

27


2013 Compared to 2012
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2012 to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission and Distribution Utilities
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
$
389

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
55

Off-System Sales
 
1

Transmission Revenues
 
46

Other Revenues
 
2

Total Change in Gross Margin
 
104

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(92
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(30
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(7
)
Interest and Investment Income
 
(2
)
Carrying Costs Income
 
(8
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
2

Interest Expense
 
(1
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(138
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
3

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
358


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity were as follows:
Retail Margins increased $55 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $123 million increase in revenues associated with OPCo's USF surcharge and Distribution Investment Recovery Rider.  A portion of these increases have corresponding increases in other expense items below.
 
A $17 million increase related to favorable regulatory proceedings for OPCo.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $40 million decrease related to Ohio customers switching to alternative CRES providers.  This decrease in Retail Margins is partially offset by an increase in Transmission Revenues related to CRES providers detailed below.
 
A $35 million decrease due to OPCo's partial reversal in 2012 of a 2011 fuel provision related to CRES providers.
Transmission Revenues increased $46 million primarily due to increased transmission revenues from Ohio customers who switched to alternative CRES providers.


28


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $92 million primarily due to the following:
 
An $86 million increase in remitted USF surcharge payments to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers.  This increase was offset by a corresponding increase in Retail Margins above.
 
A $30 million net increase related to the reversal of an obligation to contribute to Partnership with Ohio and Ohio Growth Fund as a result of the PUCO's February 2012 rejection of the Ohio modified stipulation and the PUCO's August 2012 approval of the June 2012-May 2015 ESP.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
A $14 million decrease in expenses related to the 2012 sustainable cost reductions.
 
A $13 million decrease in Ohio's gridSMART ®  expenses primarily due to a reduction in the operation and maintenance component of the gridSMART ®  rider for prior years' over collections.  This decrease was partially offset by a corresponding increase in Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and Amortization  expenses increased $30 million primarily due to the following:
 
An $8 million increase due to OPCo's and TCC's issuance of securitization bonds in August 2013 and March 2012, respectively.  This increase in OPCo's and TCC's securitization related amortizations are offset within Gross Margin.
 
A $7 million increase due to increased investment in distribution and transmission plant.
 
A $4 million increase in Ohio's gridSMART ®  expenses primarily due to an increase in the depreciation component of the gridSMART ®  rider to recover prior years' under collections.  This increase was offset by a corresponding decrease in Operation and Maintenance expenses above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes  increased $7 million primarily due to increased property taxes.
Carrying Costs Income  decreased $8 million primarily due to the first quarter 2012 recording of debt carrying costs prior to TCC's issuance of securitization bonds in March 2012.
Income Tax Expense  decreased $3 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income, partially offset by the recording of state income tax adjustments.
 

29


AEP TRANSMISSION HOLDCO


Years Ended December 31,
AEP Transmission Holdco

2014

2013

2012


(in millions)
Transmission Revenues

$
192


$
78


$
24

Gross Margin

192


78


24

Other Operation and Maintenance

29


12


9

Depreciation and Amortization

24


10


3

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes

32


20


5

Operating Income

107


36


7

Carrying Costs Income
 

 

 
1

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction

45


30


14

Interest Expense

(23
)

(10
)

(3
)
Income Before Income Tax Expense

129


56


19

Income Tax Expense

63


29


17

Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries

85


53


41

Net Income

151


80


43

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests






Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders

$
151


$
80


$
43


Summary of Net Plant In Service and CWIP for Transmission Holdco

 
 
As of December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Net Plant In Service
 
$
1,801

 
$
982

 
$
374

CWIP
 
889

 
645

 
370



30


2014 Compared to 2013
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission Holdco
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
80

 
 
 
Changes in Transmission Revenues:
 
 
Transmission Revenues
 
114

Total Change in Transmission Revenues
 
114

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(17
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(14
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(12
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
15

Interest Expense
 
(13
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(41
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(34
)
Equity Earnings
 
32

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
151


The major components of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliates were as follows:
Transmission Revenues increased $114 million primarily due to an increase in projects placed in-service by our wholly-owned transmission subsidiaries.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $17 million primarily due to increased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization  expenses increased $14 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes  increased $12 million primarily due to increased property taxes.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction  increased $15 million primarily due to increased transmission investment.
Interest Expense  increased $13 million primarily due to higher outstanding long-term debt balances.
Income Tax Expense  increased $34 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.
Equity Earnings  increased $32 million primarily due to an increase in transmission investment by ETT.


31


2013 Compared to 2012

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2012 to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission Holdco
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
$
43

 
 
 
Changes in Transmission Revenues:
 
 
Transmission Revenues
 
54

Total Change in Transmission Revenues
 
54

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(3
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(7
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(15
)
Carrying Costs Income
 
(1
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
16

Interest Expense
 
(7
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(17
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(12
)
Equity Earnings
 
12

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
80


The major components of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliates were as follows:
Transmission Revenues increased $54 million primarily due to an increase in projects placed in-service by our wholly-owned transmission subsidiaries.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $3 million primarily due increased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization  expenses increased $7 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes  increased $15 million primarily due to increased property taxes.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction  increased $16 million primarily due to increased transmission investment.
Interest Expense  increased $7 million primarily due to higher outstanding long-term debt balances.
Income Tax Expense  increased $12 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income, partially offset by other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis.
Equity Earnings  increased $12 million primarily due to an increase in transmission investment by ETT.

32


GENERATION & MARKETING
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Generation & Marketing
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Revenues
 
$
3,850

 
$
3,665

 
$
3,467

Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other
 
2,436

 
2,305

 
2,065

Gross Margin
 
1,414

 
1,360

 
1,402

Other Operation and Maintenance
 
550

 
523

 
507

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
154

 
287

Depreciation and Amortization
 
227

 
236

 
349

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
50

 
54

 
62

Operating Income
 
587

 
393

 
197

Interest and Investment Income
 
5

 
2

 
1

Interest Expense
 
(46
)
 
(55
)
 
(83
)
Income Before Income Tax Expense
 
546

 
340

 
115

Income Tax Expense
 
179

 
112

 
15

Net Income
 
367

 
228

 
100

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 

 

 

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
367

 
$
228

 
$
100

Summary of MWhs Generated for Generation & Marketing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of MWhs)
Fuel Type:
 
 
 
 
 
Coal
38
 
38
 
37
Natural Gas
7
 
6
 
11
Wind
1
 
1
 
1
Total MWhs
46
 
45
 
49


33


2014 Compared to 2013
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Generation & Marketing
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
228

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Generation
 
57

Retail, Trading and Marketing
 
(4
)
Other
 
1

Total Change in Gross Margin
 
54

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(27
)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
154

Depreciation and Amortization
 
9

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
4

Interest and Investment Income
 
3

Interest Expense
 
9

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
152

 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(67
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
367


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, purchased electricity and certain cost of service for retail operations were as follows:
Generation increased $57 million primarily due to $111 million of increased demand and market prices driven by cold temperatures in the first quarter of 2014, partially offset by $54 million due to the termination of a long-term coal contract.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $27 million primarily due to increased ARO costs related to planned retirements.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges  decreased by $154 million primarily due to the 2013 impairment of Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $9 million primarily due to the 2013 impairment of Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
Interest Expense  decreased $9 million primarily due to lower outstanding long-term debt balances and lower long-term interest rates.
Income Tax Expense increased $67 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.

34


2013 Compared to 2012
 
Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2012 to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Generation & Marketing
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
$
100

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Generation
 
(44
)
Retail, Trading and Marketing
 
4

Other
 
(2
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
(42
)
 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(16
)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
133

Depreciation and Amortization
 
113

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
8

Interest and Investment Income
 
1

Interest Expense
 
28

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
267

 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(97
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
228


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, purchased electricity and certain cost of service for retail operations were as follows:
Generation decreased $44 million primarily due to the following:
 
A $336 million decrease in affiliated sales to OPCo primarily due to customers switching to alternative CRES providers as well as a reduction in industrial usage.
 
This decrease was partially offset by the following:
 
A $221 million net increase in sales to AEP affiliates under the Interconnection Agreement.
 
A $63 million decrease in fuel expenses due to a reduction in generation at the Lawrenceburg Plant.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
Other Operation and Maintenance  expenses increased $16 million primarily due to a 2013 adjustment of $14 million to impaired plant investment as a result of changes to asset retirement obligations for asbestos removal and retirement of ash disposal facilities at impaired plants.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges  decreased $133 million due to the following:
 
A 2012 impairment of $287 million for certain Ohio generation plants, which includes $13 million of related materials and supplies inventory.
 
This decrease was partially offset by:
 
A 2013 impairment of $154 million for Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $113 million primarily due to depreciation ceasing on certain Ohio generation plants that were impaired in November 2012 and June 2013.
Interest Expense  decreased $28 million primarily due to lower outstanding long-term debt balances and lower long-term interest rates.
Income Tax Expense increased $97 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and by the recording of state income tax adjustments.


35


AEP RIVER OPERATIONS

2014 Compared to 2013

Earnings attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from our AEP River Operations segment increased from $12 million in 2013 to $49 million in 2014 due to a 28% increase in barge freight revenue for 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in 2014 freight revenue over 2013 was driven by strong barge freight demand particularly for export grain, strong northbound imports of fertilizer, salt and steel and increased shipments of domestic coal.

2013 Compared to 2012

Earnings attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from our AEP River Operations segment decreased from $15 million in 2012 to $12 million in 2013 primarily due to significant reductions in export grain and coal demand.  In addition, low water levels in the first and fourth quarters of 2013 limited barge loads and tow sizes.

CORPORATE AND OTHER

2014 Compared to 2013

Earnings attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Corporate and Other decreased from $125 million in 2013 to $4 million in 2014 primarily due to a favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013.

2013 Compared to 2012

Earnings attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Corporate and Other increased from a loss of $88 million in 2012 to income of $125 million in 2013 primarily due to a favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013 as well as a reduction in interest expense associated with the early retirement of debt in 2012.

AEP SYSTEM INCOME TAXES

2014 Compared to 2013

Income Tax Expense increased $258 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and the recording of state income tax adjustments and by a favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013.

2013 Compared to 2012

Income Tax Expense increased $80 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and the recording of state income tax adjustments, partially offset by a favorable U.K. Windfall Tax decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013.


36


FINANCIAL CONDITION

We measure our financial condition by the strength of our balance sheet and the liquidity provided by our cash flows.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Debt and Equity Capitalization
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(dollars in millions)
Long-term Debt, including amounts due within one year
 
$
18,684

 
50.7
%
 
$
18,377

 
52.2
%
Short-term Debt
 
1,346

 
3.6

 
757

 
2.1

Total Debt
 
20,030

 
54.3

 
19,134

 
54.3

AEP Common Equity
 
16,820

 
45.7

 
16,085

 
45.7

Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 

 
1

 

Total Debt and Equity Capitalization
 
$
36,854

 
100.0
%
 
$
35,220

 
100.0
%

Our ratio of debt-to-total capital remained unchanged at 54.3% as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 .

Liquidity

Liquidity, or access to cash, is an important factor in determining our financial stability.  We believe we have adequate liquidity under our existing credit facilities.  As of December 31, 2014 , we had $3.5 billion in aggregate credit facility commitments to support our operations.  Additional liquidity is available from cash from operations and a receivables securitization agreement.  We are committed to maintaining adequate liquidity.  We generally use short-term borrowings to fund working capital needs, property acquisitions and construction until long-term funding is arranged.  Sources of long-term funding include issuance of long-term debt, sale-leaseback or leasing agreements or common stock.

Commercial Paper Credit Facilities

We manage our liquidity by maintaining adequate external financing commitments.  As of December 31, 2014 , our available liquidity was approximately $3 billion as illustrated in the table below:
 
 
Amount
 
Maturity
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Commercial Paper Backup:
 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Facility
 
$
1,750

 
June 2017
Revolving Credit Facility
 
1,750

 
July 2018
Total
 
3,500

 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
163

 
 
Total Liquidity Sources
 
3,663

 
 
Less: AEP Commercial Paper Outstanding
 
602

 
 
Letters of Credit Issued
 
63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Available Liquidity
 
$
2,998

 
 

We have credit facilities totaling $3.5 billion to support our commercial paper program.  The credit facilities allow us to issue letters of credit in an amount up to $1.2 billion.


37


We use our commercial paper program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of our subsidiaries.  The program is used to fund both a Utility Money Pool, which funds the utility subsidiaries, and a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds the majority of the nonutility subsidiaries.  In addition, the program also funds, as direct borrowers, the short-term debt requirements of other subsidiaries that are not participants in either money pool for regulatory or operational reasons.  The maximum amount of commercial paper outstanding during 2014 was $877 million.  The weighted-average interest rate for our commercial paper during 2014 was 0.29%.

Other Credit Facilities

In January 2014, we issued letters of credit utilizing the entire amount available under an $85 million uncommitted facility. In October 2014, we renewed the uncommitted facility through October 2015 and increased the size of the facility to $100 million.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum future payments issued under the uncommitted facility was $81 million with a maturity date of July 2015. An uncommitted facility gives the issuer of the facility the right to accept or decline each request we make under the facility.

Financing Plan

As of December 31, 2014 , we have $2.5 billion of long-term debt due within one year which includes $785 million of Pollution Control Bonds with mandatory tender dates and credit support for variable interest rates that requires the debt be classified as current.  Also included in our long-term debt due within one year is $427 million of securitization bonds and DCC Fuel notes which will be repaid.  We plan to refinance the majority of our other maturities due within one year.

Securitized Accounts Receivables

Our receivables securitization agreement provides a commitment of $750 million from bank conduits to purchase receivables.  The agreement expires in June 2016.  

Debt Covenants and Borrowing Limitations

Our credit agreements contain certain covenants and require us to maintain our percentage of debt to total capitalization at a level that does not exceed 67.5%.  The method for calculating outstanding debt and capitalization is contractually defined in our credit agreements.  Debt as defined in the credit agreements excludes securitization bonds and debt of AEP Credit.  As of December 31, 2014 , this contractually-defined percentage was 51%.  Nonperformance under these covenants could result in an event of default under these credit agreements.  As of December 31, 2014 , we complied with all of the covenants contained in these credit agreements.  In addition, the acceleration of our payment obligations, or the obligations of certain of our major subsidiaries, prior to maturity under any other agreement or instrument relating to debt outstanding in excess of $50 million, would cause an event of default under these credit agreements.  This condition also applies in a majority of our non-exchange traded commodity contracts and would similarly allow lenders and counterparties to declare the outstanding amounts payable.  However, a default under our non-exchange traded commodity contracts would not cause an event of default under our credit agreements.

The revolving credit facilities do not permit the lenders to refuse a draw on any facility if a material adverse change occurs.

Utility Money Pool borrowings and external borrowings may not exceed amounts authorized by regulatory orders and we manage our borrowings to stay within those authorized limits.


38


Dividend Policy and Restrictions

The Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share in January 2015 .  Future dividends may vary depending upon our profit levels, operating cash flow levels and capital requirements, as well as financial and other business conditions existing at the time.  Our income derives from our common stock equity in the earnings of our utility subsidiaries.  Various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements may impose certain restrictions on the ability of our utility subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of dividends.  However, we do not believe these restrictions will have any significant impact on Parent’s ability to access cash to meet the payment of dividends on its common stock.

Credit Ratings

We do not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit downgrade, but our access to the commercial paper market may depend on our credit ratings.  In addition, downgrades in our credit ratings by one of the rating agencies could increase our borrowing costs.  Counterparty concerns about the credit quality of AEP or its utility subsidiaries could subject us to additional collateral demands under adequate assurance clauses under our derivative and non-derivative energy contracts.

CASH FLOW

Managing our cash flows is a major factor in maintaining our liquidity strength.
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
$
118

 
$
279

 
$
221

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
4,613

 
4,106

 
3,804

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(4,406
)
 
(3,818
)
 
(3,391
)
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
(162
)
 
(449
)
 
(355
)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
45

 
(161
)
 
58

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
163

 
$
118

 
$
279


Cash from operations and short-term borrowings provides working capital and allows us to meet other short-term cash needs.
 
Operating Activities
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Net Income
 
$
1,638

 
$
1,484

 
$
1,262

Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,929

 
1,743

 
1,782

Other
 
1,046

 
879

 
760

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
$
4,613

 
$
4,106

 
$
3,804


Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities were $4.6 billion in 2014 consisting primarily of Net Income of $1.6 billion, and $1.9 billion of noncash Depreciation and Amortization.  Other changes represent items that had a current period cash flow impact, such as changes in working capital, as well as items that represent future rights or obligations to receive or pay cash, such as regulatory assets and liabilities.  Deferred Income Taxes increased primarily due to provisions in the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 and an increase in tax versus book temporary differences from operations.  The reduction in Fuel, Material and Supplies balance reflect a decrease in fuel inventory due to cold winter weather and increased generation.  


39


Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities were $4.1 billion in 2013 consisting primarily of Net Income of $1.5 billion, $1.7 billion of noncash Depreciation and Amortization and $226 million of Asset Impairments related to Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5, Big Sandy and Amos Plants, partially offset by $214 million of Ohio capacity deferrals as a result of a 2012 PUCO order.  Other changes represent items that had a current period cash flow impact, such as changes in working capital, as well as items that represent future rights or obligations to receive or pay cash, such as regulatory assets and liabilities.  Deferred Income Taxes increased primarily due to provisions in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 and an increase in tax versus book temporary differences from operations.  Significant changes in other items include the favorable impact of a decrease in fuel inventory and net cash flows for Accrued Taxes as a result of the recognition of the tax benefit related to the U.K. Windfall Tax.

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities were $3.8 billion in 2012 consisting primarily of Net Income of $1.3 billion, $1.8 billion of noncash Depreciation and Amortization and $287 million in Asset Impairments related to certain Ohio generation assets.  Other changes represent items that had a current period cash flow impact, such as changes in working capital, as well as items that represent future rights or obligations to receive or pay cash, such as regulatory assets and liabilities.  A significant change in other items includes the unfavorable impact of an increase in fuel inventory due to the mild winter weather.  Deferred Income Taxes increased primarily due to provisions in the Small Business Jobs Act and the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Jobs Creation Act and an increase in tax versus book temporary differences from operations.  During 2012 , we also contributed $200 million to our qualified pension trust.
 
Investing Activities
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Construction Expenditures
 
$
(4,134
)
 
$
(3,624
)
 
$
(3,025
)
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel
 
(116
)
 
(154
)
 
(107
)
Acquisitions of Assets/Businesses
 
(65
)
 
(32
)
 
(94
)
Proceeds from Sales of Assets
 
6

 
21

 
18

Other
 
(97
)
 
(29
)
 
(183
)
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
$
(4,406
)
 
$
(3,818
)
 
$
(3,391
)
 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities were $4.4 billion in 2014 primarily due to Construction Expenditures for environmental, distribution and transmission investments. We also purchased transmission assets for $38 million.

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities were $3.8 billion in 2013 primarily due to Construction Expenditures for environmental, distribution and transmission investments.

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities were $3.4 billion in 2012 primarily due to Construction Expenditures for new generation, environmental, distribution and transmission investments.  Acquisitions of Assets/Businesses include our March 2012 purchase of BlueStar for $70 million.
 
Financing Activities
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
 
$
73

 
$
84

 
$
83

Issuance/Retirement of Debt, Net
 
876

 
385

 
544

Proceeds from Nuclear Fuel Sale/Leaseback
 

 
110

 

Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(998
)
 
(954
)
 
(916
)
Other
 
(113
)
 
(74
)
 
(66
)
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
$
(162
)
 
$
(449
)
 
$
(355
)


40


Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities in 2014 were $162 million.  Our net debt issuances were $876 million.  The net issuances included issuances of $1.6 billion of senior unsecured notes and other debt notes, $444 million of pollution control bonds and an increase in short-term borrowing of $589 million offset by retirements of $1.1 billion of notes, $412 million of pollution control bonds and $306 million of securitization bonds.  We paid common stock dividends of $998 million.  See Note 14  – Financing Activities.

Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities in 2013 were $449 million.  Our net debt issuances were $385 million.  The net issuances included issuances of $745 million of senior unsecured notes, $1 billion draws on a $1 billion term credit facility, $647 million of securitization bonds, $328 million of notes payable and other debt and $305 million of pollution control bonds offset by retirements of $1.8 billion of senior unsecured and other debt notes, $331 million of pollution control bonds, $243 million of securitization bonds and a decrease in short-term borrowing of $224 million.  We paid common stock dividends of $954 million.

Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities in 2012 were $355 million.  Our net debt issuances were $544 million. The net issuances included issuances of $1.7 billion of senior unsecured notes, $800 million of securitization bonds, $287 million of notes payable and other debt and $65 million of pollution control bonds offset by retirements of $902 million of senior unsecured and other debt notes, $315 million of junior subordinate debentures, $220 million of pollution control bonds, $206 million of securitization bonds and a decrease in short-term borrowing of $669 million.  We paid common stock dividends of $916 million.

The following financing activities occurred during 2014 :

AEP Common Stock:

During 2014, we issued 1.6 million shares of common stock under our incentive compensation, employee saving and dividend reinvestment plans and received net proceeds of $73 million.

Debt:

During 2014, we issued approximately $2.1 billion of long-term debt, including $1.3 billion of senior notes at interest rates ranging from 2.61% to 5.52% and $200 million of pollution control revenue bonds at interest rates ranging from 1.625% to 1.75%, $244 million of pollution control revenue bonds at variable interest rates and $359 million of other debt at variable interest rates.  The proceeds from these issuances were used to fund long-term debt maturities and our construction programs.
During 2014 , we entered no interest rate derivatives and settled $4.7 million of such transactions.  The settlements resulted in net cash received of $3 million.  As of December 31, 2014 , we had in place $815 million of notional interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow and fair value hedges.

In 2015:

In January 2015, TCC retired $120 million of Securitization Bonds.
In January 2015, OPCo retired $22 million of Securitization Bonds.
In January 2015, SWEPCo remarketed $54 million of 1.6% Pollution Control Bonds due in 2019.
In January 2015, PSO issued $87.5 million of 3.17% and $87.5 million of 4.09% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2025 and 2045, respectively.
In January and February 2015, I&M retired $23 million of Notes Payable related to DCC Fuel.
In February 2015, APCo retired $11 million of Securitization Bonds.



41


BUDGETED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES

We forecast approximately $4.5 billion of construction expenditures including debt AFUDC for 2015.  For 2016 and 2017, we forecast construction expenditures of $3.8 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively.  The expenditures are generally for transmission, generation, distribution and required environmental investment to comply with Federal EPA rules.  Estimated construction expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, weather, legal reviews and the ability to access capital.  We expect to fund these construction expenditures through cash flows from operations and financing activities.  Generally, the subsidiaries use cash or short-term borrowings under the money pool to fund these expenditures until long-term funding is arranged.  The 2015 estimated construction expenditures include generation, transmission and distribution related investments, as well as expenditures for compliance with environmental regulations as follows:
 
 
2015 Budgeted Construction Expenditures
Segment
 
Environmental
 
Generation
 
Transmission
 
Distribution
 
Other
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
$
594

 
$
496

 
$
472

 
$
654

 
$
110

 
$
2,326

Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
2

 
2

 
359

 
545

 
64

 
972

AEP Transmission Holdco
 

 

 
988

 

 
7

 
995

Generation & Marketing
 
65

 
70

 

 

 
10

 
145

AEP River Operations
 

 
9

 

 

 

 
9

Corporate and Other
 

 

 

 

 
12

 
12

Total
 
$
661

 
$
577

 
$
1,819

 
$
1,199

 
$
203

 
$
4,459


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Our current guidelines restrict the use of off-balance sheet financing entities or structures to traditional operating lease arrangements that we enter in the normal course of business.  The following identifies significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

Rockport Plant, Unit 2

AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction in 1989 with Wilmington Trust Company (Owner Trustee), an unrelated unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 (the Plant).  The Owner Trustee was capitalized with equity from six owner participants with no relationship to AEP or any of its subsidiaries and debt from a syndicate of banks and certain institutional investors.  The future minimum lease payments for AEGCo and I&M are $592 million each as of December 31, 2014 .

The gain from the sale was deferred and is being amortized over the term of the lease, which expires in 2022.  The Owner Trustee owns the Plant and leases it to AEGCo and I&M.  Our subsidiaries account for the lease as an operating lease with the future payment obligations included in Note 13 .  The lease term is for 33 years with potential renewal options.  At the end of the lease term, AEGCo and I&M have the option to renew the lease or the Owner Trustee can sell the Plant.  We, as well as our subsidiaries, have no ownership interest in the Owner Trustee and do not guarantee its debt.

Railcars

In June 2003, we entered into an agreement with BTM Capital Corporation, as lessor, to lease 875 coal-transporting aluminum railcars.  The initial lease term was five years with three consecutive five-year renewal periods for a maximum lease term of twenty years.  We intend to maintain the lease for the full lease term of twenty years via the renewal options.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease.  The future minimum lease obligation is $24 million for the remaining railcars as of December 31, 2014 .  Under a return-and-sale option, the lessor is guaranteed that the sale proceeds will equal at least a specified lessee obligation amount which declines with each five-year renewal.  As of

42


December 31, 2014 , the maximum potential loss was approximately $19 million assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the current five-year lease term.  However, we believe that the fair value would produce a sufficient sales price to avoid any loss.  We have other railcar lease arrangements that do not utilize this type of financing structure.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION INFORMATION

Our contractual cash obligations include amounts reported on the balance sheets and other obligations disclosed in our footnotes.  The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2014 :
Payments Due by Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contractual Cash Obligations
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Short-term Debt (a)
 
$
1,346

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,346

Interest on Fixed Rate Portion of Long-term Debt (b)
 
819

 
1,530

 
1,285

 
7,079

 
10,713

Fixed Rate Portion of Long-term Debt (c)
 
1,180

 
2,629

 
3,057

 
9,938

 
16,804

Variable Rate Portion of Long-term Debt (d)
 
1,323

 
548

 
33

 

 
1,904

Capital Lease Obligations (e)
 
134

 
218

 
109

 
239

 
700

Noncancelable Operating Leases (e)
 
293

 
520

 
462

 
693

 
1,968

Fuel Purchase Contracts (f)
 
2,154

 
2,815

 
1,931

 
2,501

 
9,401

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
363

 
405

 
426

 
2,087

 
3,281

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (g)
 
1,332

 
1,604

 
814

 
1,571

 
5,321

Total
 
$
8,944

 
$
10,269

 
$
8,117

 
$
24,108

 
$
51,438


(a)
Represents principal only excluding interest.
(b)
Interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemptions or debt issuances.
(c)
See “Long-term Debt” section of Note 14 .  Represents principal only, excluding interest.
(d)
See “Long-term Debt” section of Note 14 .  Represents principal only, excluding interest.  Variable rate debt had interest rates that ranged between 0.04% and 1.89% as of December 31, 2014 .
(e)
See Note 13 .
(f)
Represents contractual obligations to purchase coal, natural gas, uranium and other consumables as fuel for electric generation along with related transportation of the fuel.
(g)
Represents only capital assets for which we have signed contracts.  Actual payments are dependent upon and may vary significantly based upon the decision to build, regulatory approval schedules, timing and escalation of project costs.

Our $124 million liability related to uncertainty in Income Taxes is not included above because we cannot reasonably estimate the cash flows by period.

Our pension funding requirements are not included in the above table.  As of December 31, 2014 , we expect to make contributions to our pension plans totaling $93 million in 2015 .  Estimated contributions of $93 million in 2016 and $97 million in 2017 may vary significantly based on market returns, changes in actuarial assumptions and other factors.  Based upon the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets available to pay pension benefits, our pension plans were 95.1% funded as of December 31, 2014 .


43


In addition to the amounts disclosed in the contractual cash obligations table above, we make additional commitments in the normal course of business.  These commitments include standby letters of credit, guarantees for the payment of obligation performance bonds and other commitments.  As of December 31, 2014 , our commitments outstanding under these agreements are summarized in the table below:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Commercial Commitments
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Standby Letters of Credit (a)
 
$
63

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
63

Guarantees of the Performance of Outside Parties (b)
 

 

 

 
115

 
115

Guarantees of Our Performance (c)
 
991

 
12

 

 
59

 
1,062

Total Commercial Commitments
 
$
1,054

 
$
12

 
$

 
$
174

 
$
1,240


(a)
We enter into standby letters of credit (LOCs) with third parties.  These LOCs cover items such as natural gas and electricity risk management contracts, construction contracts, insurance programs, security deposits and debt service reserves.  AEP, on behalf of our subsidiaries, and/or the subsidiaries issued all of these LOCs in the ordinary course of business.  There is no collateral held in relation to any guarantees in excess of our ownership percentages.  In the event any LOC is drawn, there is no recourse to third parties.  The maximum future payments of these LOCs are $63 million with maturities ranging from February 2015 to March 2016.  See “Letters of Credit” section of Note 6 .
(b)
See “Guarantees of Third-Party Obligations” section of Note 6 .
(c)
We issued performance guarantees and indemnifications for energy trading and various sale agreements.

SIGNIFICANT TAX LEGISLATION

The Small Business Jobs Act extended the time for claiming bonus depreciation and increased the deduction to 100% for 2011 and decreased the deduction to 50% for 2012.  The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 provided for the extension of several business and energy industry tax deductions and credits, including the one-year extension of the 50% bonus depreciation to 2013.  The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 also included a one-year extension of the 50% bonus depreciation and provided for the extension of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits for 2014. These enacted provisions had no material impact on net income or financial condition but did have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2013 and 2014 and are expected to have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2015.

CYBER SECURITY

Cyber security presents a growing risk for electric utility systems because a cyber-attack could affect critical energy infrastructure.  Breaches to the cyber security of the grid or to our system are potentially disruptive to people, property and commerce and create risk for our business, investors and customers.  In February 2013, President Obama signed an executive order that addresses how government agencies will operate and support the functions in cyber security as well as redefines how the government interfaces with critical infrastructure, such as the electric grid.  We already operate under regulatory cyber security standards to protect critical infrastructure.  The cyber security framework that is being developed through this executive order will be reviewed by FERC and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).  In 2014, the DOE developed an Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework Implementation Guide for utilities to use in adopting and implementing the National Institute of Standards and Technology framework. We are actively engaged in the framework adoption process.

The electric utility industry is one of the few critical infrastructure functions with mandatory cyber security requirements under the authority of FERC. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave FERC the authority to oversee reliability of the bulk power system, including the authority to approve mandatory cyber security reliability standards. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), which FERC certified as the nation's Electric Reliability Organization,

44


developed critical infrastructure protection cyber security reliability standards. In 2013, as part of our industry’s continuing program to advance threat sharing and coordination, we participated in the NERC GridEx II exercise.  This effort, led by NERC, tested and developed the coordination and interaction between utilities and various government agencies relative to potential cyber and physical threats against the nation’s electric grid.

We protect our critical cyber assets, such as our data centers, power plants, transmission operations centers and business network, using multiple layers of cyber security and authentication.  We constantly scan the system for risks or threats. Cyber hackers have been able to breach a number of very secure facilities, from federal agencies, banks and retailers to social media sites.  As these events become known and develop, we continually assess our own cyber security tools and processes to determine where we might need to strengthen our defenses. We continually review our business continuity plan to develop an effective recovery effort that decreases our response times, limits financial impacts and maintains customer confidence following any business interruption. Management works closely with a broad range of departments, including Legal, Regulatory, Corporate Communications and Information Technology Security, to ensure the corporate response to consequences of any breach or potential breach is appropriate both for internal and external audiences based on the specific circumstances surrounding the event.

We continue to take steps to enhance our capabilities for identifying risks or threats and have shared that knowledge with our utility peers, industry and federal agencies.  We operate our own Cyber Security Operations Center.  Funding for this included a grant from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid Demonstration Program.  This facility was initially designed as a pilot cyber threat and information-sharing center specifically for the electric sector and is fully operational.

We have partnered with a major defense contractor who has significant cyber security experience and technical capabilities developed through their work with the U.S. Department of Defense.  We work with a consortium of other utilities across the country, learning how best to share information about potential threats and collaborating with each other.  We continue to work with a nonaffiliated entity to conduct several seminars each year about recognizing and investigating cyber vulnerabilities.  Through these types of efforts, we are working to protect ourselves while helping our industry advance its cyber security capabilities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures, including amounts related to legal matters and contingencies.  We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

It requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and
Changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a material effect on net income or financial condition.

We discuss the development and selection of critical accounting estimates as presented below with the Audit Committee of AEP’s Board of Directors and the Audit Committee reviews the disclosures relating to them.

We believe that the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our financial statements are appropriate.  However, actual results can differ significantly from those estimates.

The sections that follow present information about our critical accounting estimates, as well as the effects of hypothetical changes in the material assumptions used to develop each estimate.


45


Regulatory Accounting

Nature of Estimates Required

Our financial statements reflect the actions of regulators that can result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.

We recognize regulatory assets (deferred expenses to be recovered in the future) and regulatory liabilities (deferred future revenue reductions or refunds) for the economic effects of regulation.  Specifically, we match the timing of expense and income recognition with regulated revenues.  We also record liabilities for refunds, or probable refunds, to customers that have not been made.

Assumptions and Approach Used

When incurred costs are probable of recovery through regulated rates, we record them as regulatory assets on the balance sheet.  We review the probability of recovery at each balance sheet date and whenever new events occur.  Similarly, we record regulatory liabilities when a determination is made that a refund is probable or when ordered by a commission.  Examples of new events that affect probability include changes in the regulatory environment, issuance of a regulatory commission order or passage of new legislation.  The assumptions and judgments used by regulatory authorities continue to have an impact on the recovery of costs as well as the return of revenues, rate of return earned on invested capital and timing and amount of assets to be recovered through regulated rates.  If recovery of a regulatory asset is no longer probable, we write off that regulatory asset as a charge against earnings.  A write-off of regulatory assets or establishment of a regulatory liability may also reduce future cash flows since there will be no recovery through regulated rates.

Effect if Different Assumptions Used

A change in the above assumptions may result in a material impact on our net income.  Refer to Note 5 for further detail related to regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities.

Revenue Recognition – Unbilled Revenues

Nature of Estimates Required

We record revenues when energy is delivered to the customer.  The determination of sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which we perform on a systematic basis throughout the month.  At the end of each month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue accrual is recorded.  This estimate is reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on meter readings.  In accordance with the applicable state commission regulatory treatment in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas, PSO and SWEPCo do not record the fuel portion of unbilled revenue.

The changes in unbilled electric utility revenues for our Vertically Integrated Utilities segment were $(29) million, $(9) million and $13 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  The changes in unbilled electric revenues are primarily due to changes in weather and rate increases.  Accrued unbilled revenues for the Vertically Integrated Utilities segment were $254 million and $283 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.

The changes in unbilled electric utility revenues for our Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment were $16 million, $(22) million and $(12) million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  The changes in unbilled electric revenues are primarily due to changes in weather and rate increases.  Accrued unbilled revenues for the Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment were $181 million and $165 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.


46


In March 2012, our Generation & Marketing segment acquired an independent retail electric supplier.  The change in unbilled electric utility revenues for our Generation & Marketing segment was $9 million, $10 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  Accrued unbilled revenues for the Generation & Marketing segment were $50 million and $41 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.

Assumptions and Approach Used

For each operating company, we compute the monthly estimate for unbilled revenues as net generation (generation plus purchases less sales) less the current month’s billed KWh plus the prior month’s unbilled KWh.  However, due to meter reading issues, meter drift and other anomalies, a separate monthly calculation limits the unbilled estimate within a range of values.  This limiter calculation is derived from an allocation of billed KWh to the current month and previous month, on a cycle-by-cycle basis, and by dividing the current month aggregated result by the billed KWh.  The limits are statistically set at one standard deviation from this percentage to determine the upper and lower limits of the range.  The unbilled estimate is compared to the limiter calculation and adjusted for variances exceeding the upper and lower limits.

For certain contracts, we calculate unbilled revenues by contract using the most recent historic daily activity adjusted for significant known changes in usage.

Effect if Different Assumptions Used

Significant fluctuations in energy demand for the unbilled period, weather, line losses or changes in the composition of customer classes could impact the accuracy of the unbilled revenue estimate.  A 1% change in the limiter calculation when it is outside the range would increase or decrease unbilled revenues by 1% of the accrued unbilled revenues.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

Nature of Estimates Required

We consider fair value techniques, valuation adjustments related to credit and liquidity and judgments related to the probability of forecasted transactions occurring within the specified time period to be critical accounting estimates.  These estimates are considered significant because they are highly susceptible to change from period to period and are dependent on many subjective factors.

Assumptions and Approach Used

We measure the fair values of derivative instruments and hedge instruments accounted for using MTM accounting based primarily on exchange prices and broker quotes.  If a quoted market price is not available, we estimate the fair value based on the best market information available including valuation models that estimate future energy prices based on existing market and broker quotes, supply and demand market data and other assumptions.  Fair value estimates, based upon the best market information available, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  These uncertainties include projections of macroeconomic trends and future commodity prices, including supply and demand levels and future price volatility.

We reduce fair values by estimated valuation adjustments for items such as discounting, liquidity and credit quality.  We calculate liquidity adjustments by utilizing bid/ask spreads to estimate the potential fair value impact of liquidating open positions over a reasonable period of time.  We calculate credit adjustments on our risk management contracts using estimated default probabilities and recovery rates relative to our counterparties or counterparties with similar credit profiles and contractual netting agreements.

With respect to hedge accounting, we assess hedge effectiveness and evaluate a forecasted transaction’s probability of occurrence within the specified time period as provided in the original hedge documentation.


47


Effect if Different Assumptions Used

There is inherent risk in valuation modeling given the complexity and volatility of energy markets.  Therefore, it is possible that results in future periods may be materially different as contracts settle.

The probability that hedged forecasted transactions will not occur by the end of the specified time period could change operating results by requiring amounts currently classified in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to be classified into operating income.

For additional information regarding derivatives, hedging and fair value measurements, see Notes 10 and 11.  See “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” section of Note 1 for fair value calculation policy.

Long-Lived Assets

Nature of Estimates Required

In accordance with the requirements of “Property, Plant and Equipment” accounting guidance, we evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such assets may not be recoverable including planned abandonments and a probable disallowance for rate-making on a plant under construction or the assets meet the held-for-sale criteria.  We utilize a group composite method of depreciation to estimate the useful lives of long-lived assets.  The evaluations of long-lived, held-and-used assets may result from abandonments, significant decreases in the market price of an asset, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is being used or in its physical condition, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, as well as other economic or operations analyses.  If the carrying amount is not recoverable, we record an impairment to the extent that the fair value of the asset is less than its book value.  Performing an impairment evaluation involves a significant degree of estimation and judgment in areas such as identifying circumstances that indicate an impairment may exist, identifying and grouping affected assets and developing the undiscounted and discounted future cash flows (used to estimate fair value in the absence of market-based value, in some instances) associated with the asset.  For assets held for sale, an impairment is recognized if the expected net sales price is less than its book value.  For regulated assets, the earnings impact of an impairment charge could be offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset if rate recovery is probable.  For nonregulated assets, any impairment charge is recorded against earnings.

Assumptions and Approach Used

The fair value of an asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale.  Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available.  In the absence of quoted prices for identical or similar assets in active markets, we estimate fair value using various internal and external valuation methods including cash flow projections or other market indicators of fair value such as bids received, comparable sales or independent appraisals.  Cash flow estimates are based on relevant information available at the time the estimates are made.  Estimates of future cash flows are, by nature, highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results.  Also, when measuring fair value, management evaluates the characteristics of the asset or liability to determine if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Such characteristics include, for example, the condition and location of the asset or restrictions of the use of the asset.  We perform depreciation studies that include a review of any external factors that may affect the useful life to determine composite depreciation rates and related lives which are subject to periodic review by state regulatory commissions for cost-based regulated assets.  The fair value of the asset could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.


48


Effect if Different Assumptions Used

In connection with the evaluation of long-lived assets in accordance with the requirements of “Property, Plant and Equipment” accounting guidance, the fair value of an asset can vary if different estimates and assumptions would have been used in our applied valuation techniques.  The estimate for depreciation rates takes into account the history of interim capital replacements and the amount of salvage expected.  In cases of impairment, we made our best estimate of fair value using valuation methods based on the most current information at that time.  Fluctuations in realized sales proceeds versus the estimated fair value of the asset are generally due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, differences in subsequent market conditions, the level of bidder interest, timing and terms of the transactions and our analysis of the benefits of the transaction.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

We maintain a qualified, defined benefit pension plan (Qualified Plan), which covers substantially all nonunion and certain union employees, and unfunded, nonqualified supplemental plans (Nonqualified Plans) to provide benefits in excess of amounts permitted under the provisions of the tax law for participants in the Qualified Plan (collectively the Pension Plans).  Additionally, we entered into individual employment contracts with certain current and retired executives that provide additional retirement benefits as a part of the Nonqualified Plans.  We also sponsor other postretirement benefit plans to provide health and life insurance benefits for retired employees (Postretirement Plans).  The Pension Plans and Postretirement Plans are collectively referred to as the Plans.

For a discussion of investment strategy, investment limitations, target asset allocations and the classification of investments within the fair value hierarchy, see “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” and “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” sections of Note 1 .  See Note 8 for information regarding costs and assumptions for employee retirement and postretirement benefits.

The following table shows the net periodic cost (credit) of the Plans:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Pension Plans
 
$
158

 
$
180

 
$
134

Postretirement Plans
 
(77
)
 
(17
)
 
89


The net periodic benefit cost is calculated based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on the Plans’ assets.  In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption for 2015 , we evaluated input from actuaries and investment consultants, including their reviews of asset class return expectations as well as long-term inflation assumptions.  We also considered historical returns of the investment markets and changes in tax rates which affect a portion of the Postretirement Plans’ assets.  We anticipate that the investment managers we employ for the Plans will invest the assets to generate future returns averaging 6% for the Qualified Plan and 6.75% for the Postretirement Plans.


49


The expected long-term rate of return on the Plans’ assets is based on our targeted asset allocation and our expected investment returns for each investment category.  Our assumptions are summarized in the following table:
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 
Assumed/
 



 
Assumed/
 
2015
 
Expected
 
2015
 
Expected
 
Target
 
Long-Term
 
Target
 
Long-Term
 
Asset
 
Rate of
 
Asset
 
Rate of
 
Allocation
 
Return
 
Allocation
 
Return
Equity
30
%
 
8.50
%
 
65
%
 
8.50
%
Fixed Income
55
%
 
4.10
%
 
33
%
 
4.10
%
Other Investments
15
%
 
7.30
%
 
%
 
%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
%
 
%
 
2
%
 
2.80
%
Total
100
%
 
 
 
100
%
 
 

We regularly review the actual asset allocation and periodically rebalance the investments to our targeted allocation.  We believe that 6% and 6.75% are reasonable estimates of the long-term rate of return on the Plans’ assets.  The Pension Plans’ assets had an actual gain of 10.6% and 8.1% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The Postretirement Plans’ assets had an actual gain of 7.2% and 14.3% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  We will continue to evaluate the actuarial assumptions, including the expected rate of return, at least annually, and will adjust the assumptions as necessary.

We base our determination of pension expense or income on a market-related valuation of assets, which reduces year-to-year volatility.  This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur.  Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return based on the market-related value of assets.  Since the market-related value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period, the future value of assets will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded.  As of December 31, 2014 , we had cumulative gains of approximately $270 million that remain to be recognized in the calculation of the market-related value of assets.  These unrecognized net actuarial gains may result in decreases in the future pension costs depending on several factors, including whether such gains at each measurement date exceed the corridor in accordance with “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” accounting guidance.

The method used to determine the discount rate that we utilize for determining future obligations is a duration-based method in which a hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds is constructed with cash flows matching the benefit plan liability.  The composite yield on the hypothetical bond portfolio is used as the discount rate for the plan.  The discount rate as of December 31, 2014 under this method was 4% for the Qualified Plan, 3.9% for the Nonqualified Plans and 4% for the Postretirement Plans.  Due to the effect of the unrecognized actuarial gains and based on an expected rate of return on the Pension Plans’ assets of 6%, discount rates of 4% and 3.9% and various other assumptions including adoption of updated mortality tables that the Society of Actuaries issued in October 2014, we estimate that the pension costs for the Pension Plans will approximate $129 million, $96 million and $66 million in 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , respectively.  Based on an expected rate of return on the Postretirement Plans’ assets of 6.75%, a discount rate of 4% and various other assumptions including adoption of updated mortality tables that the Society of Actuaries issued in October 2014, we estimate credits will approximate $94 million, $98 million and $103 million in 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , respectively.  Future actual costs will depend on future investment performance, changes in future discount rates and various other factors related to the populations participating in the Plans.  The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results.  The effects of a 50 basis point change to selective actuarial assumptions are included in the “Effect if Different Assumptions Used” section below.


50


The value of the Pension Plans’ assets increased to $5 billion as of December 31, 2014 from $4.7 billion as of December 31, 2013 primarily due to investment returns and company contributions in excess of benefit payments.  During 2014 , the Qualified Plan paid $289 million and the Nonqualified Plans paid $7 million in benefits to plan participants.  The value of the Postretirement Plans’ assets remained unchanged at $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 primarily due to investment returns and contributions by the company and the participants offsetting benefit payments.  The Postretirement Plans paid $134 million in benefits to plan participants during 2014 .

Nature of Estimates Required

We sponsor pension and other retirement and postretirement benefit plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements.  We account for these benefits under “Compensation” and “Plan Accounting” accounting guidance.  The measurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations, costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions.

Assumptions and Approach Used

The critical assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors:

Discount rate
Compensation increase rate
Cash balance crediting rate
Health care cost trend rate
Expected return on plan assets

Other assumptions, such as retirement, mortality and turnover, are evaluated periodically and updated to reflect actual experience.

Effect if Different Assumptions Used

The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, longer or shorter life spans of participants or higher or lower lump sum versus annuity payout elections by plan participants.  These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and postretirement benefit expense recorded.  If a 50 basis point change were to occur for the following assumptions, the approximate effect on the financial statements would be as follows:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
(in millions)
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(282
)
 
$
311

 
$
(78
)
 
$
86

Compensation Increase Rate
 
20

 
(19
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
70

 
(63
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
34

 
(30
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(17
)
 
19

 
(5
)
 
5

Compensation Increase Rate
 
5

 
(4
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
14

 
(13
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
5

 
(4
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(22
)
 
22

 
(8
)
 
8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NA   Not applicable.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


51


ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Pronouncements Adopted in 2015

The FASB issued ASU 2014-08 “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant and Equipment” changing the presentation of discontinued operations on the statements of income and other requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new standard, a disposal of a component or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when the component meets the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale or is disposed. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations and disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations. We adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. We expect no impact on the financial statements in the first quarter of 2015.

Pronouncements Effective in the Future

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on revenue or net income. We plan to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2017.

The FASB issued ASU 2015-01 “Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items” eliminating the concept of extraordinary items for presentation on the face of the income statement. Under the new standard, a material event or transaction that is unusual in nature, infrequent or both shall be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Alternatively, it may be disclosed in the notes to financial statements. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted if applied from the beginning of a fiscal year. As applicable, this standard may change the presentation of amounts in the income statements. We plan to adopt ASU 2015-01 effective January 1, 2016.

Future Accounting Changes

The FASB’s standard-setting process is ongoing and until new standards have been finalized and issued, we cannot determine the impact on the reporting of our operations and financial position that may result from any such future changes.  The FASB is currently working on several projects including financial instruments, leases, insurance, hedge accounting and consolidation policy.  The ultimate pronouncements resulting from these and future projects could have an impact on our future net income and financial position.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risks

Our Vertically Integrated Utilities segment is exposed to certain market risks as a major power producer and through its transactions in power, coal, natural gas and marketing contracts.  These risks include commodity price risk, interest rate risk and credit risk.  In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as we occasionally procure various services and materials used in our energy business from foreign suppliers.  These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact us due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.

Our Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment is exposed to FTR price risk as it relates to RTO congestion during the June 2012 – May 2015 Ohio ESP period.  Additional risks include energy procurement risk and interest rate risk.
Our Generation & Marketing segment conducts marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, PJM and MISO.  This segment is exposed to certain market risks as a marketer of wholesale and retail electricity.  These risks

52


include commodity price risk, interest rate risk and credit risk.  These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact us due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.  In addition, our Generation & Marketing segment is also exposed to certain market risks as a major power producer and through its transactions in wholesale electricity, natural gas and coal trading and marketing contracts.

We employ risk management contracts including physical forward purchase-and-sale contracts and financial forward purchase-and-sale contracts.  We engage in risk management of power, coal, natural gas and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other commodity contracts to manage the risk associated with our energy business.  As a result, we are subject to price risk.  The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations, Energy Supply and Finance groups in accordance with our established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors.  Our market risk oversight staff independently monitors our risk policies, procedures and risk levels and provides members of the Commercial Operations Risk Committee (Regulated Risk Committee) and the Energy Supply Risk Committee (Competitive Risk Committee) various daily, weekly and/or monthly reports regarding compliance with policies, limits and procedures.  The Regulated Risk Committee consists of AEPSC’s Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Generation, Senior Vice President of Commercial Operations and Chief Risk Officer.  The Competitive Risk Committee consists of AEPSC’s Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer in addition to Energy Supply’s President and Vice President.  When commercial activities exceed predetermined limits, we modify the positions to reduce the risk to be within the limits unless specifically approved by the respective committee.

The following table summarizes the reasons for changes in total MTM value as compared to December 31, 2013 :
MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vertically
Integrated
Utilities
 
Transmission
and
Distribution
Utilities
 
Generation
&
Marketing
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets as of December 31, 2013
$
32

 
$
3

 
$
157

 
$
192

Gain from Contracts Realized/Settled During the Period and Entered in a Prior Period
(17
)
 
(3
)
 
(39
)
 
(59
)
Fair Value of New Contracts at Inception When Entered During the Period (a)

 

 
12

 
12

Changes in Fair Value Due to Market Fluctuations During the Period (b)

 

 
10

 
10

Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (c)
21

 
46

 

 
67

Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets as of December 31, 2014
$
36

 
$
46

 
$
140

 
222

Commodity Cash Flow Hedge Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
2

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Cash Flow Hedge Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
Fair Value Hedge Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6
)
Collateral Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
32

Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets as of December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
249


(a)
Reflects fair value on primarily long-term structured contracts which are typically with customers that seek fixed pricing to limit their risk against fluctuating energy prices.  The contract prices are valued against market curves associated with the delivery location and delivery term.  A significant portion of the total volumetric position has been economically hedged.
(b)
Market fluctuations are attributable to various factors such as supply/demand, weather, etc.
(c)
Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory liabilities/assets.

53


See Note 10 – Derivatives and Hedging and Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements for additional information related to our risk management contracts.  The following tables and discussion provide information on our credit risk and market volatility risk.

Credit Risk

We limit credit risk in our wholesale marketing and trading activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis.  We use Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and current market-based qualitative and quantitative data as well as financial statements to assess the financial health of counterparties on an ongoing basis.

We have risk management contracts with numerous counterparties.  Since open risk management contracts are valued based on changes in market prices of the related commodities, our exposures change daily.  As of December 31, 2014 , our credit exposure net of collateral to sub investment grade counterparties was approximately 8.4%, expressed in terms of net MTM assets, net receivables and the net open positions for contracts not subject to MTM (representing economic risk even though there may not be risk of accounting loss).  As of December 31, 2014 , the following table approximates our counterparty credit quality and exposure based on netting across commodities, instruments and legal entities where applicable:
Counterparty Credit Quality
 
Exposure
Before
Credit
Collateral
 
Credit
Collateral
 
Net
Exposure
 
Number of
Counterparties
>10% of
Net Exposure
 
Net Exposure
of
Counterparties
>10%
 
 
(in millions, except number of counterparties)
Investment Grade
 
$
628

 
$
3

 
$
625

 
2

 
$
249

Split Rating
 
21

 

 
21

 
1

 
21

Noninvestment Grade
 
2

 
2

 

 

 

No External Ratings:
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
Internal Investment Grade
 
83

 

 
83

 
3

 
41

Internal Noninvestment Grade
 
83

 
16

 
67

 
2

 
36

Total as of December 31, 2014
 
$
817

 
$
21

 
$
796

 
8

 
$
347

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total as of December 31, 2013
 
$
787

 
$
18

 
$
769

 
9

 
$
381


In addition, we are exposed to credit risk related to our participation in RTOs.  For each of the RTOs in which we participate, this risk is generally determined based on our proportionate share of member gross activity over a specified period of time.

Value at Risk (VaR) Associated with Risk Management Contracts

We use a risk measurement model, which calculates VaR, to measure our commodity price risk in the risk management portfolio.  The VaR is based on the variance-covariance method using historical prices to estimate volatilities and correlations and assumes a 95% confidence level and a one-day holding period.  Based on this VaR analysis, as of December 31, 2014 , a near term typical change in commodity prices is not expected to materially impact net income, cash flows or financial condition.


54


The following tables show the end, high, average and low market risk as measured by VaR for the periods indicated:

VaR Model
Trading Portfolio
Twelve Months Ended
 
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
End
 
High
 
Average
 
Low
 
End
 
High
 
Average
 
Low
(in millions)
 
(in millions)
$

 
$
3

 
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$


VaR Model
Non-Trading Portfolio
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2014
End
 
High
 
Average
 
Low
(in millions)
$
2

 
$
3

 
$
1

 
$


We back-test our VaR results against performance due to actual price movements.  Based on the assumed 95% confidence interval, the performance due to actual price movements would be expected to exceed the VaR at least once every 20 trading days.

As our VaR calculation captures recent price movements, we also perform regular stress testing of the trading portfolio to understand our exposure to extreme price movements.  We employ a historical-based method whereby the current trading portfolio is subjected to actual, observed price movements from the last several years in order to ascertain which historical price movements translated into the largest potential MTM loss.  We then research the underlying positions, price movements and market events that created the most significant exposure and report the findings to the Risk Executive Committee, Regulated Risk Committee, or Competitive Risk Committee as appropriate.

Interest Rate Risk

We utilize an Earnings at Risk (EaR) model to measure interest rate market risk exposure. EaR statistically quantifies the extent to which our interest expense could vary over the next twelve months and gives a probabilistic estimate of different levels of interest expense.  The resulting EaR is interpreted as the dollar amount by which actual interest expense for the next twelve months could exceed expected interest expense with a one-in-twenty chance of occurrence.  The primary drivers of EaR are from the existing floating rate debt (including short-term debt) as well as long-term debt issuances in the next twelve months.  As calculated on debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the estimated EaR on our debt portfolio for the following twelve months was $33 million and $32 million, respectively.

55


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
American Electric Power Company, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Ame rica.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


56


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
American Electric Power Company, Inc.:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


57


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies (AEP) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  AEP’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of AEP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, AEP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

AEP’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on AEP’s internal control over financial reporting.  The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm appears on the previous page.

58



AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
 (in millions, except per-share and share amounts)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
$
9,397

 
$
9,347

 
$
8,785

Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
4,553

 
4,279

 
4,659

Generation & Marketing
 
2,384

 
1,208

 
882

Other Revenues
 
686

 
523

 
619

TOTAL REVENUES
 
17,020

 
15,357

 
14,945

EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 
4,272

 
4,068

 
4,111

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
2,086

 
1,491

 
1,169

Other Operation
 
3,225

 
2,904

 
2,962

Maintenance
 
1,361

 
1,179

 
1,115

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
226

 
300

Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,929

 
1,743

 
1,782

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
915

 
891

 
850

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
13,788

 
12,502

 
12,289

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
3,232

 
2,855

 
2,656

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and Investment Income
 
7

 
58

 
8

Carrying Costs Income
 
33

 
30

 
53

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
103

 
73

 
93

Interest Expense
 
(885
)
 
(906
)
 
(988
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY EARNINGS
 
2,490

 
2,110

 
1,822

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
942

 
684

 
604

Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
 
90

 
58

 
44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
1,638

 
1,484

 
1,262

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 
4

 
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
1,634

 
$
1,480

 
$
1,259

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
 
488,592,997

 
486,619,555

 
484,682,469

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF DILUTED AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
 
488,899,840

 
487,040,956

 
485,084,694

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
3.34

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.60

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .

59


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in millions)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
1,638

 
$
1,484

 
$
1,262

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $3, $8 and $8 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
5

 
15

 
(15
)
Securities Available for Sale, Net of Tax of $0, $1 and $1 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
1

 
3

 
2

Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $3, $12 and $16 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
5

 
22

 
31

Pension and OPEB Funded Status, Net of Tax of $1, $95 and $62 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
1

 
177

 
115

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
12

 
217

 
133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
1,650

 
1,701

 
1,395

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 
4

 
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP
COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
 
$
1,646

 
$
1,697

 
$
1,392

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .

60


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in millions)
 
AEP Common Shareholders
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
504

 
$
3,274

 
$
5,970

 
$
5,890

 
$
(470
)
 
$
1

 
$
14,665

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Common Stock
2

 
15

 
68

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
83

Common Stock Dividends ($1.88/share)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(913
)
 
 
 
(3
)
 
(916
)
Other Changes in Equity
 
 
 
 
11

 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
 
10

Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,259

 
 
 
3

 
1,262

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
133

 
 
 
133

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
506

 
3,289

 
6,049

 
6,236

 
(337
)
 

 
15,237

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Common Stock
2

 
14

 
70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
84

Common Stock Dividends ($1.95/share)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(950
)
 
 
 
(4
)
 
(954
)
Other Changes in Equity
 
 
 
 
12

 
 
 
 
 
1

 
13

Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,480

 
 
 
4

 
1,484

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
217

 
 
 
217

Pension and OPEB Adjustment Related to Mitchell Plant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5

 
 
 
5

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
508

 
3,303

 
6,131

 
6,766

 
(115
)
 
1

 
16,086

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Common Stock
2

 
10

 
63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
73

Common Stock Dividends ($2.03/share)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(994
)
 
 
 
(4
)
 
(998
)
Other Changes in Equity
 
 
 
 
10

 
 
 
 
 
3

 
13

Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,634

 
 
 
4

 
1,638

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12

 
 
 
12

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
510

 
$
3,313

 
$
6,204

 
$
7,406

 
$
(103
)
 
$
4

 
$
16,824

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .



AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in millions)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
163

 
$
118

Other Temporary Investments
    (December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $371 and $335, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding and EIS)
 
386

 
353

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
727

 
746

Accrued Unbilled Revenues
 
146

 
157

Pledged Accounts Receivable – AEP Credit
 
987

 
945

Miscellaneous
 
87

 
72

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(21
)
 
(60
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
1,926

 
1,860

Fuel
 
587

 
701

Materials and Supplies
 
738

 
722

Risk Management Assets
 
178

 
160

Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs
 
127

 
80

Margin Deposits
 
95

 
70

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
278

 
246

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
4,478

 
4,310

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
25,727

 
25,074

Transmission
 
12,433

 
10,893

Distribution
 
17,157

 
16,377

Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Plant to be Retired, Coal Mining and Nuclear Fuel)
 
5,770

 
5,470

Construction Work in Progress
 
3,218

 
2,471

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
64,305

 
60,285

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
20,188

 
19,288

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  – NET
 
44,117

 
40,997

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
4,264

 
4,376

Securitized Assets
 
2,072

 
2,373

Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
2,096

 
1,932

Goodwill
 
91

 
91

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
294

 
297

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
2,221

 
2,038

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
11,038

 
11,107

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
59,633

 
$
56,414

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .

62


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Accounts Payable
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,287

 
$
1,266

Short-term Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securitized Debt for Receivables – AEP Credit
 
 
 
 
 
 
744

 
700

Other Short-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
602

 
57

Total Short-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,346

 
757

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $431 and $416, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, DCC Fuel, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding and Sabine)
 
 
2,503

 
1,549

Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
92

 
90

Customer Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
324

 
299

Accrued Taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
871

 
822

Accrued Interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
239

 
245

Regulatory Liability for Over-Recovered Fuel Costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
55

 
119

Other Current Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,250

 
965

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,967

 
6,112

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $2,260 and $2,532, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, DCC Fuel, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding, Transource Energy and Sabine)
 
 
16,181

 
16,828

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
131

 
177

Deferred Income Taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,986

 
10,300

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
3,892

 
3,694

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,951

 
1,835

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
630

 
415

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,071

 
967

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
34,842

 
34,216

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
42,809

 
40,328

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – Par Value – $6.50 Per Share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
Shares Authorized
 
600,000,000
 
600,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
Shares Issued
 
509,739,159
 
508,113,964
 
 
 
 
 
(20,336,592 Shares were Held in Treasury as of December 31, 2014 and 2013)
 
 
3,313

 
3,303

Paid-in Capital
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,204

 
6,131

Retained Earnings
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,406

 
6,766

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(103
)
 
(115
)
TOTAL AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
16,820

 
16,085

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
4

 
1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
16,824

 
16,086

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
59,633

 
$
56,414

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .


63


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in millions)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
1,638

 
$
1,484

 
$
1,262

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,929

 
1,743

 
1,782

Deferred Income Taxes
 
878

 
709

 
636

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
226

 
300

Carrying Costs Income
 
(33
)
 
(30
)
 
(53
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(103
)
 
(73
)
 
(93
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
(53
)
 
38

 
57

Amortization of Nuclear Fuel
 
144

 
131

 
136

Pension and Postemployment Benefit Reserves
 
80

 
172

 
120

Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust
 
(71
)
 

 
(200
)
Property Taxes
 
(42
)
 
(35
)
 
(19
)
Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
(36
)
 
62

 
157

Deferral of Ohio Capacity Costs, Net
 
(114
)
 
(214
)
 
(65
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
26

 
(184
)
 
(171
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
242

 
(169
)
 
7

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
(72
)
 
5

 
(16
)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
102

 
122

 
(224
)
Accounts Payable
 
(80
)
 
95

 
(60
)
Accrued Taxes, Net
 
4

 
85

 
174

Other Current Assets
 
(36
)
 
5

 
(3
)
Other Current Liabilities
 
210

 
(66
)
 
77

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
4,613

 
4,106

 
3,804

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(4,134
)
 
(3,624
)
 
(3,025
)
Change in Other Temporary Investments, Net
 
(31
)
 
(11
)
 
(27
)
Purchases of Investment Securities
 
(1,088
)
 
(927
)
 
(1,047
)
Sales of Investment Securities
 
1,032

 
858

 
988

Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel
 
(116
)
 
(154
)
 
(107
)
Acquisitions of Assets/Businesses
 
(65
)
 
(32
)
 
(94
)
Insurance Proceeds Related to Cook Plant Fire
 

 
72

 

Proceeds from Sales of Assets
 
6

 
21

 
18

Other Investing Activities
 
(10
)
 
(21
)
 
(97
)
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(4,406
)
 
(3,818
)
 
(3,391
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Common Stock, Net
 
73

 
84

 
83

Issuance of Long-term Debt
 
2,067

 
3,207

 
2,856

Commercial Paper and Credit Facility Borrowings
 

 
17

 
25

Change in Short-term Debt, Net
 
589

 
(221
)
 
(654
)
Retirement of Long-term Debt
 
(1,780
)
 
(2,598
)
 
(1,643
)
Commercial Paper and Credit Facility Repayments
 

 
(20
)
 
(40
)
Proceeds from Nuclear Fuel Sale/Leaseback
 

 
110

 

Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(120
)
 
(82
)
 
(71
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(998
)
 
(954
)
 
(916
)
Other Financing Activities
 
7

 
8

 
5

Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
(162
)
 
(449
)
 
(355
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
45

 
(161
)
 
58

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
118

 
279

 
221

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
163

 
$
118

 
$
279

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 65 .

64


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
INDEX OF NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Acquisition and Impairments
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Stock-based Compensation
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

65


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1 .   ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION

Our principal business is the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power.  The subsidiaries that conduct most of these activities are regulated by the FERC under the Federal Power Act and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and maintain accounts in accordance with the FERC and other regulatory guidelines.  Most of these companies are subject to further regulation with regard to rates and other matters by state regulatory commissions except Energy Supply subsidiaries.

We provide competitive electric and gas supply for residential, commercial and industrial customers in Ohio, Illinois and other deregulated electricity markets and also provide energy management solutions throughout the United States, including energy efficiency services through our independent retail electric supplier.

We also engage in wholesale electricity, natural gas and other commodity marketing and risk management activities in the United States and provide various energy-related services.  In addition, our operations include nonregulated wind farms and barging operations.

Corporate Separation

Background

On December 31, 2013, as approved by the FERC and the PUCO, OPCo transferred its generation assets and related generation liabilities at net book value to AGR.  In accordance with Ohio law, OPCo remains responsible to provide power and capacity to OPCo customers who have not switched electric providers.  Effective January 1, 2014, OPCo began purchasing power from both affiliated and nonaffiliated entities, subject to PUCO approval, to meet the energy and capacity needs of customers. On December 31, 2013, subsequent to the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets and associated liabilities to AGR, AGR transferred at net book value its ownership (867 MW) in Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo and one-half of its interest (780 MW) in the Mitchell Plant to KPCo.  

Other Impacts of Corporate Separation

The Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection Agreement was also terminated.

Effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved:

A PCA among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.  Under the PCA, APCo, I&M and KPCo are individually responsible for planning their respective capacity obligations and there are no capacity equalization charges/credits under the PCA on deficit/surplus companies.   Further, the PCA allows, but does not obligate, APCo, I&M and KPCo to participate collectively under a common fixed resource requirement capacity plan in PJM and to participate in specified collective off-system sales and purchase activities.
A Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as agent.  The Bridge Agreement is an interim arrangement to: (a) address the treatment of purchases and sales made by AEPSC on behalf of member companies that extend beyond termination of the Interconnection Agreement and (b) address how member companies will fulfill their existing obligations under the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement through the 2014/2015 PJM planning year.  Under the Bridge Agreement, AGR is committed to use its capacity to help meet the PJM capacity obligations of member companies through May 31, 2015.

66


A Power Supply Agreement (PSA) between AGR and OPCo for AGR to supply capacity for OPCo’s switched (at $188.88 /MW day) and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015 and to supply the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that was not acquired through auctions in 2014.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Rates and Service Regulation

Our public utility subsidiaries’ rates are regulated by the FERC and state regulatory commissions in our eleven state operating territories.  The FERC also regulates our affiliated transactions, including AEPSC intercompany service billings which are generally at cost, under the 2005 Public Utility Holding Company Act and the Federal Power Act.  The FERC also has jurisdiction over the issuances and acquisitions of securities of our public utility subsidiaries, the acquisition or sale of certain utility assets and mergers with another electric utility or holding company.  For non-power goods and services, the FERC requires a nonregulated affiliate to bill an affiliated public utility company at no more than market while a public utility must bill the higher of cost or market to a nonregulated affiliate.  The state regulatory commissions also regulate certain intercompany transactions under various orders and affiliate statutes.  Both the FERC and state regulatory commissions are permitted to review and audit the relevant books and records of companies within a public utility holding company system.

The FERC regulates wholesale power markets and wholesale power transactions.  Our wholesale power transactions are generally market-based.  Wholesale power transactions are cost-based regulated when we negotiate and file a cost-based contract with the FERC or the FERC determines that we have “market power” in the region where the transaction occurs.  We have entered into wholesale power supply contracts with various municipalities and cooperatives that are FERC-regulated, cost-based contracts.  These contracts are generally formula rate mechanisms, which are trued up to actual costs annually.  

The state regulatory commissions regulate all of the distribution operations and rates of our retail public utilities on a cost basis.  The state regulatory commissions also regulate the retail generation/power supply operations and rates except in Ohio and the ERCOT region of Texas.  The ESP rates in Ohio continue the process of transitioning generation/power supply rates over time to market rates.  In the ERCOT region of Texas, the generation/supply business is under customer choice and market pricing and is conducted by Texas Retail Electric Providers (REPs).  Through our nonregulated subsidiaries, we enter into short and long-term wholesale transactions to buy or sell capacity, energy and ancillary services in the ERCOT market.  In addition, these nonregulated subsidiaries control certain wind and coal-fired generation assets, the power from which is marketed and sold in ERCOT.  We have no active REPs in ERCOT.

The FERC also regulates our wholesale transmission operations and rates.  The FERC claims jurisdiction over retail transmission rates when retail rates are unbundled in connection with restructuring.  OPCo’s retail transmission rates in Ohio, APCo’s retail transmission rates in Virginia, I&M’s retail transmission rates in Michigan and TCC’s and TNC’s retail transmission rates in Texas are unbundled.  OPCo’s retail transmission rates in Ohio, APCo’s retail transmission rates in Virginia and I&M’s retail transmission rates in Michigan are based on formula rates included in the PJM OATT that are cost-based.  Although TCC’s and TNC’s retail transmission rates in Texas are unbundled, retail transmission rates are regulated, on a cost basis, by the PUCT.  Bundled retail transmission rates are regulated, on a cost basis, by the state commissions.  Transmission rates for our seven wholly-owned transmission subsidiaries within our AEP Transmission Holdco segment are based on formula rates included in the applicable RTO’s OATT that are cost-based.

In addition, the FERC regulates the SIA, the Operating Agreement, the Transmission Agreement and the Transmission Coordination Agreement, all of which are still active and allocate shared system costs and revenues among the utility subsidiaries that are parties to each agreement.  In accordance with our October 2012 filing with the FERC, the Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection Agreement was also terminated.  In December 2013, the FERC issued orders approving the creation of a PCA, effective January 1, 2014.  Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved the creation of a Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent. Effective June 1, 2014, the FERC approved the cancellation of the System Transmission Integration Agreement.

67


Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary.  Intercompany items are eliminated in consolidation.  We use the equity method of accounting for equity investments where we exercise significant influence but do not hold a controlling financial interest.  Such investments are initially recorded at cost in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets. Our proportionate share of the investee's equity earnings is included in Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries on the statements of income. Equity method investments are required to be tested for impairment when it is determined there may be an other-than-temporary loss in value. We have ownership interests in generating units that are jointly-owned.  Our proportionate share of the operating costs associated with such facilities is included on the statements of income and our proportionate share of the assets and liabilities are reflected on the balance sheets.

Accounting for the Effects of Cost-Based Regulation

As the owner of rate-regulated electric public utility companies, our financial statements reflect the actions of regulators that result in the recognition of certain revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.  In accordance with accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations,” we record regulatory assets (deferred expenses) and regulatory liabilities (deferred revenue reductions or refunds) to reflect the economic effects of regulation in the same accounting period by matching expenses with their recovery through regulated revenues and by matching income with its passage to customers in cost-based regulated rates.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  These estimates include, but are not limited to, inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill, intangible and long-lived asset impairment, unbilled electricity revenue, valuation of long-term energy contracts, the effects of regulation, long-lived asset recovery, storm costs, the effects of contingencies and certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and postretirement benefits.  The estimates and assumptions used are based upon management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the financial statements.  Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents include temporary cash investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Other Temporary Investments

Other Temporary Investments include funds held by trustees primarily for the payment of securitization bonds and securities available for sale, including marketable securities that we intend to hold for less than one year and investments by our protected cell of EIS.

We classify our investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity in accordance with the provisions of “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities” accounting guidance.  We do not have any investments classified as trading.

Available-for-sale securities reflected in Other Temporary Investments are carried at fair value with the unrealized gain or loss, net of tax, reported in AOCI.  Held-to-maturity securities reflected in Other Temporary Investments are carried at amortized cost.  The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification or weighted average cost method.


68


In evaluating potential impairment of securities with unrealized losses, we considered, among other criteria, the current fair value compared to cost, the length of time the security's fair value has been below cost, our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in value and current economic conditions.  See “Fair Value Measurements of Other Temporary Investments” in Note 11 .

Inventory

Fossil fuel inventories are generally carried at average cost with the exception of AGR and TNC which are carried at the lower of average cost or market.  Materials and supplies inventories are carried at average cost.

Accounts Receivable

Customer accounts receivable primarily include receivables from wholesale and retail energy customers, receivables from energy contract counterparties related to our risk management activities and customer receivables primarily related to other revenue-generating activities.

We recognize revenue from electric power sales when we deliver power to our customers.  To the extent that deliveries have occurred but a bill has not been issued, we accrue and recognize, as Accrued Unbilled Revenues on the balance sheets, an estimate of the revenues for energy delivered since the last billing.

AEP Credit factors accounts receivable on a daily basis, excluding receivables from risk management activities, for I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and a portion of APCo.  Since APCo does not have regulatory authority to sell accounts receivable in its West Virginia regulatory jurisdiction, only a portion of APCo’s accounts receivable are sold to AEP Credit.  AEP Credit has a receivables securitization agreement with bank conduits.  Under the securitization agreement, AEP Credit receives financing from the bank conduits for the interest in the billed and unbilled receivables AEP Credit acquires from affiliated utility subsidiaries.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

Generally, AEP Credit records bad debt expense based upon a 12-month rolling average of bad debt write-offs in proportion to gross accounts receivable purchased from participating AEP subsidiaries.  For receivables related to APCo’s West Virginia operations, the bad debt reserve is calculated based on a rolling two -year average write-off in proportion to gross accounts receivable.  For customer accounts receivables related to our risk management activities, accounts receivables are reviewed for bad debt reserves at a specific counterparty level basis.  For the wires business of TCC and TNC, bad debt reserves are calculated using the specific identification of receivable balances greater than 120 days delinquent, and for those balances less than 120 days where the collection is doubtful.  For miscellaneous accounts receivable, bad debt expense is recorded for all amounts outstanding 180 days or greater at 100% , unless specifically identified.  Miscellaneous accounts receivable items open less than 180 days may be reserved using specific identification for bad debt reserves.

Emission Allowances

In regulated jurisdictions, we record emission allowances at cost, including the annual SO 2 and NO x emission allowance entitlements received at no cost from the Federal EPA.  For our nonregulated business, we record allowances at the lower of cost or market.  We follow the inventory model for these allowances.  We record allowances expected to be consumed within one year in Materials and Supplies and allowances with expected consumption beyond one year in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets.  We record the consumption of allowances in the production of energy in Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation on the statements of income at an average cost.  We report the purchases and sales of allowances in the Operating Activities section of the statements of cash flows.  We record the net margin on sales of emission allowances in Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenue on the statements of income because of its integral nature to the production process of energy and our revenue optimization strategy for our utility operations.  The net margin on sales of emission allowances affects the determination of deferred fuel or deferred emission allowance costs and the amortization of regulatory assets for certain jurisdictions.

69


Property, Plant and Equipment

Regulated

Electric utility property, plant and equipment for our rate-regulated operations are stated at original cost.  Additions, major replacements and betterments are added to the plant accounts.  Under the group composite method of depreciation, continuous interim routine replacements of items such as boiler tubes, pumps, motors, etc. result in original cost retirements, less salvage, being charged to accumulated depreciation.  The group composite method of depreciation assumes that on average, asset components are retired at the end of their useful lives and thus there is no gain or loss.  The equipment in each primary electric plant account is identified as a separate group.  The depreciation rates that are established take into account the past history of interim capital replacements and the amount of removal cost incurred and salvage received.  These rates and the related lives are subject to periodic review.  Removal costs are charged to regulatory liabilities.  The costs of labor, materials and overhead incurred to operate and maintain our plants are included in operating expenses.

Long-lived assets are required to be tested for impairment when it is determined that the carrying value of the assets may no longer be recoverable or when the assets meet the held-for-sale criteria under the accounting guidance for “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”  When it becomes probable that an asset in service or an asset under construction will be abandoned and regulatory cost recovery has been disallowed, the cost of that asset shall be removed from plant-in-service or CWIP and charged to expense.

The fair value of an asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, as opposed to a forced or liquidation sale.  Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available.  In the absence of quoted prices for identical or similar assets in active markets, fair value is estimated using various internal and external valuation methods including cash flow analysis and appraisals.

Nonregulated

Our nonregulated operations generally follow the policies of our rate-regulated operations listed above but with the following exceptions.  Property, plant and equipment of nonregulated operations are stated at fair value at acquisition (or as adjusted for any applicable impairments) plus the original cost of property acquired or constructed since the acquisition, less disposals.  Normal and routine retirements from the plant accounts, net of salvage, are charged to accumulated depreciation for most nonregulated operations under the group composite method of depreciation.  For nonregulated plant assets, a gain or loss would be recorded if the retirement is not considered an interim routine replacement.  Removal costs are charged to expense.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalization

For regulated operations, AFUDC represents the estimated cost of borrowed and equity funds used to finance construction projects that is capitalized and recovered through depreciation over the service life of regulated electric utility plant.  We record the equity component of AFUDC in Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction and the debt component of AFUDC as a reduction to Interest Expense.  For nonregulated operations, including certain generating assets, interest is capitalized during construction in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Capitalization of Interest.”

Valuation of Nonderivative Financial Instruments

The book values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Short-term Debt approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.  The book value of the pre-April 1983 spent nuclear fuel disposal liability approximates the best estimate of its fair value.


70


Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities

The accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2.  When quoted market prices are not available, pricing may be completed using comparable securities, dealer values, operating data and general market conditions to determine fair value.  Valuation models utilize various inputs such as commodity, interest rate and, to a lesser degree, volatility and credit that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, market corroborated inputs (i.e. inputs derived principally from, or correlated to, observable market data) and other observable inputs for the asset or liability. The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations, Energy Supply and Finance groups in accordance with our established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors.  Our market risk oversight staff independently monitors our risk policies, procedures and risk levels and provides members of the Commercial Operations Risk Committee (Regulated Risk Committee) and the Energy Supply Risk Committee (Competitive Risk Committee) various daily, weekly and/or monthly reports regarding compliance with policies, limits and procedures.  The Regulated Risk Committee consists of AEPSC's Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Generation, Senior Vice President of Commercial Operations and Chief Risk Officer.  The Competitive Risk Committee consists of AEPSC's Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer in addition to Energy Supply's President and Vice President.

For our commercial activities, exchange traded derivatives, namely futures contracts, are generally fair valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1.  Level 2 inputs primarily consist of OTC broker quotes in moderately active or less active markets, as well as exchange traded contracts where there is insufficient market liquidity to warrant inclusion in Level 1.  We verify our price curves using these broker quotes and classify these fair values within Level 2 when substantially all of the fair value can be corroborated.  We typically obtain multiple broker quotes, which are nonbinding in nature, but are based on recent trades in the marketplace.  When multiple broker quotes are obtained, we average the quoted bid and ask prices.  In certain circumstances, we may discard a broker quote if it is a clear outlier.  We use a historical correlation analysis between the broker quoted location and the illiquid locations.  If the points are highly correlated we include these locations within Level 2 as well.  Certain OTC and bilaterally executed derivative instruments are executed in less active markets with a lower availability of pricing information.  Illiquid transactions, complex structured transactions, FTRs and counterparty credit risk may require nonmarket based inputs.  Some of these inputs may be internally developed or extrapolated and utilized to estimate fair value.  When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized as Level 3.  The main driver of our contracts being classified as Level 3 is the inability to substantiate our energy price curves in the market.  A significant portion of our Level 3 instruments have been economically hedged which greatly limits potential earnings volatility.

We utilize our trustee’s external pricing service in our estimate of the fair value of the underlying investments held in the benefit plan and nuclear trusts.  Our investment managers review and validate the prices utilized by the trustee to determine fair value.  We perform our own valuation testing to verify the fair values of the securities.  We receive audit reports of our trustee’s operating controls and valuation processes.  The trustee uses multiple pricing vendors for the assets held in the trusts.

Assets in the benefits and nuclear trusts, Cash and Cash Equivalents and Other Temporary Investments are classified using the following methods.  Equities are classified as Level 1 holdings if they are actively traded on exchanges.  Items classified as Level 1 are investments in money market funds, fixed income and equity mutual funds and domestic equity securities.  They are valued based on observable inputs primarily unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  Items classified as Level 2 are primarily investments in individual fixed income securities and cash equivalents funds.  Fixed income securities generally do not trade on exchanges and do not have an official closing price but their valuation inputs are based on observable market data.  Pricing vendors calculate bond valuations using financial models and matrices.  The models use observable inputs including yields on benchmark securities, quotes by

71


securities brokers, rating agency actions, discounts or premiums on securities compared to par prices, changes in yields for U.S. Treasury securities, corporate actions by bond issuers, prepayment schedules and histories, economic events and, for certain securities, adjustments to yields to reflect changes in the rate of inflation.  Other securities with model-derived valuation inputs that are observable are also classified as Level 2 investments.  Investments with unobservable valuation inputs are classified as Level 3 investments.  Benefit plan assets included in Level 3 are primarily real estate and private equity investments that are valued using methods requiring judgment including appraisals. The fair value of real estate investments is measured using market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of private equity investments is measured using cost and purchase multiples, operating results, discounted future cash flows and market based comparable data. Depending on the specific situation, one or multiple approaches are used to determine the valuation of a real estate or private equity investment.

Deferred Fuel Costs

The cost of fuel and related emission allowances and emission control chemicals/consumables is charged to Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation expense when the fuel is burned or the allowance or consumable is utilized.  The cost of fuel also includes the cost of nuclear fuel burned which is computed primarily on the units-of-production method.  In regulated jurisdictions with an active FAC, fuel cost over-recoveries (the excess of fuel-related revenues over applicable fuel costs incurred) are generally deferred as current regulatory liabilities and under-recoveries (the excess of applicable fuel costs incurred over fuel-related revenues) are generally deferred as current regulatory assets.  Fuel cost over-recovery and under-recovery balances are classified as noncurrent when there is a phase-in plan or the FAC has been suspended.  These deferrals are amortized when refunded or when billed to customers in later months with the state regulatory commissions’ review and approval.  The amount of an over-recovery or under-recovery can also be affected by actions of the state regulatory commissions.  On a routine basis, state regulatory commissions review and/or audit our fuel procurement policies and practices, the fuel cost calculations and FAC deferrals.  When a FAC under-recovery is no longer probable of recovery, we adjust our FAC deferrals and record provisions for estimated refunds to recognize these probable outcomes.

Changes in fuel costs, including purchased power in Kentucky for KPCo, in Indiana and Michigan for I&M, in Ohio (through the ESP related to standard service offer load served) for OPCo, in Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas for SWEPCo, in Oklahoma for PSO and in Virginia and West Virginia (upon securitization in November 2013) for APCo are reflected in rates in a timely manner generally through the FAC.  Changes in fuel costs, including purchased power in Ohio (from 2009 through 2011) for OPCo and in West Virginia (prior to securitization in November 2013) for APCo are reflected in rates through FAC phase-in plans.  The FAC generally includes some sharing of off-system sales margins.  In West Virginia for APCo, all of the margins from off-system sales are given to customers through the FAC.  Prior to corporate separation, none of the margins from off-system sales were given to customers through the FAC in Ohio for OPCo.  A portion of margins from off-system sales are given to customers through the FAC and other rate mechanisms in Oklahoma for PSO, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas for SWEPCo, Virginia for APCo and in Indiana and Michigan for I&M.  Where the FAC or off-system sales sharing mechanism is capped, frozen or non-existent, changes in fuel costs or sharing of off-system sales impact earnings.

Revenue Recognition

Regulatory Accounting

Our financial statements reflect the actions of regulators that can result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.  Regulatory assets (deferred expenses) and regulatory liabilities (deferred revenue reductions or refunds) are recorded to reflect the economic effects of regulation in the same accounting period by matching expenses with their recovery through regulated revenues and by matching income with its passage to customers in cost-based regulated rates.


72


When regulatory assets are probable of recovery through regulated rates, we record them as assets on the balance sheets.  We test for probability of recovery at each balance sheet date or whenever new events occur.  Examples of new events include the issuance of a regulatory commission order or passage of new legislation.  If it is determined that recovery of a regulatory asset is no longer probable, we write off that regulatory asset as a charge against income.

Electricity Supply and Delivery Activities

Revenues are recognized from retail and wholesale electricity sales and electricity transmission and distribution delivery services.  For regulated and nonregulated operations, we recognize the revenues on the statements of income upon delivery of the energy to the customer and include unbilled as well as billed amounts.  In accordance with the applicable state commission regulatory treatment, PSO and SWEPCo do not record the fuel portion of unbilled revenue.

Most of the power produced at our generation plants is sold to PJM or SPP.  We also purchase power from PJM and SPP to supply our customers.  Generally, these power sales and purchases for the regulated subsidiaries are reported on a net basis as revenues on the statements of income.  However, purchases of power in excess of sales to PJM or SPP, on an hourly net basis, used to serve retail load are recorded gross as Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income. With the exception of certain dedicated load bilateral power supply contracts, the transactions of our nonregulated subsidiaries are reported as gross purchases or sales.

Physical energy purchases arising from non-derivative contracts are accounted for on a gross basis in Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.  Energy purchases arising from non-trading derivative contracts are recorded based on the transaction’s facts and circumstances.  Purchases under non-trading derivatives used to serve accrual based obligations are recorded in Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.  All other non-trading derivative purchases are recorded net in revenues.

In general, we record expenses when purchased electricity is received and when expenses are incurred, with the exception of certain power purchase contracts that are derivatives and accounted for using MTM accounting where generation/supply rates are not cost-based regulated.  In jurisdictions where the generation/supply business is subject to cost-based regulation, the unrealized MTM amounts are deferred as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).

Energy Marketing and Risk Management Activities

We engage in wholesale power, coal and natural gas marketing and risk management activities focused on wholesale markets where we own assets and adjacent markets.  Our activities include the purchase and sale of energy under forward contracts at fixed and variable prices.  These contracts include physical transactions, exchange-traded futures, and to a lesser extent, OTC swaps and options.  We engage in certain energy marketing and risk management transactions with RTOs.

We recognize revenues and expenses from wholesale marketing and risk management transactions that are not derivatives upon delivery of the commodity.  We use MTM accounting for wholesale marketing and risk management transactions that are derivatives unless the derivative is designated in a qualifying cash flow hedge relationship or a normal purchase or sale.  We include unrealized and realized gains and losses on wholesale marketing and risk management transactions that are accounted for using MTM in revenues or expense on the transaction's facts and circumstances.   In jurisdictions subject to cost-based regulation, we defer unrealized MTM amounts and some realized gains and losses as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).  We include unrealized MTM gains and losses resulting from derivative contracts on the balance sheets as Risk Management Assets or Liabilities as appropriate.

Certain qualifying wholesale marketing and risk management derivative transactions are designated as hedges of variability in future cash flows as a result of forecasted transactions (cash flow hedge).  We initially record the effective portion of the cash flow hedge’s gain or loss as a component of AOCI.  When the forecasted transaction is realized and affects net income, we subsequently reclassify the gain or loss on the hedge from AOCI into revenues or expenses

73


within the same financial statement line item as the forecasted transaction on the statements of income.  Excluding those jurisdictions subject to cost-based regulation, we recognize the ineffective portion of the gain or loss in revenues or expense immediately on the statements of income, depending on the specific nature of the associated hedged risk.  In regulated jurisdictions, we defer the ineffective portion as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).  See “Accounting for Cash Flow Hedging Strategies” section of Note 10 .

Barging Activities

AEP River Operations’ revenue is recognized based on percentage of voyage completion.  The proportion of freight transportation revenue to be recognized is determined by applying a percentage to the contractual charges for such services.  The percentage is determined by dividing the number of miles from the loading point to the position of the barge as of the end of the accounting period by the total miles to the destination specified in the customer’s freight contract.  The position of the barge at accounting period end is determined by our computerized barge tracking system.

SPP Integrated Power Market
In March 2014, SPP changed from an energy imbalance service market to a fully integrated power market. In the past, PSO and SWEPCo would satisfy their load requirements with their own generation resources or through the Operating Agreement. In the new integrated power market, PSO and SWEPCo operate as standalone entities by offering their respective generation into the SPP power market, which then economically dispatches the resources. This change further enables retail customers to obtain power through either internal generation or power purchases from the SPP market. The new integrated power market now operates in a similar manner as the PJM power market for the AEP East Companies. The change in the SPP integrated power market did not have a significant effect on the 2014 results of operations or cash flows.

Levelization of Nuclear Refueling Outage Costs

In accordance with regulatory orders, I&M defers incremental operation and maintenance costs associated with periodic refueling outages at its Cook Plant and amortizes the costs over the period beginning with the month following the start of each unit’s refueling outage and lasting until the end of the month in which the same unit’s next scheduled refueling outage begins.  I&M adjusts the amortization amount as necessary to ensure full amortization of all deferred costs by the end of the refueling cycle.

Maintenance

We expense maintenance costs as incurred.  If it becomes probable that we will recover specifically-incurred costs through future rates, we establish a regulatory asset to match the expensing of those maintenance costs with their recovery in cost-based regulated revenues.  In certain regulatory jurisdictions, we defer costs above the level included in base rates and amortize those deferrals commensurate with recovery through rate riders.

Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under the liability method, we provide deferred income taxes for all temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities which will result in a future tax consequence.

When the flow-through method of accounting for temporary differences is reflected in regulated revenues (that is, when deferred taxes are not included in the cost of service for determining regulated rates for electricity), we record deferred income taxes and establish related regulatory assets and liabilities to match the regulated revenues and tax expense.

74


We account for investment tax credits under the flow-through method except where regulatory commissions reflect investment tax credits in the rate-making process on a deferral basis.  We amortize deferred investment tax credits over the life of the plant investment.

We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Income Taxes.”  We classify interest expense or income related to uncertain tax positions as interest expense or income as appropriate and classify penalties as Other Operation expense.

Excise Taxes

We act as an agent for some state and local governments and collect from customers certain excise taxes levied by those state or local governments on our customers.  We do not recognize these taxes as revenue or expense.

Debt

We defer gains and losses from the reacquisition of debt used to finance regulated electric utility plants and amortize the deferral over the remaining term of the reacquired debt in accordance with their rate-making treatment unless the debt is refinanced.  If we refinance the reacquired debt associated with the regulated business, the reacquisition costs attributable to the portions of the business subject to cost-based regulatory accounting are generally deferred and amortized over the term of the replacement debt consistent with its recovery in rates.  Operations not subject to cost-based rate regulation report gains and losses on the reacquisition of debt in Interest Expense on the statements of income upon reacquisition.

We defer debt discount or premium and debt issuance expenses and amortize generally utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related debt.  The straight-line method approximates the effective interest method and is consistent with the treatment in rates for regulated operations.  We include the net amortization expense in Interest Expense on the statements of income.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

When we acquire businesses, we record the fair value of all assets and liabilities, including intangible assets.  To the extent that consideration exceeds the fair value of identified assets, we record goodwill.  We do not amortize goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.  We test acquired goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually at their estimated fair value.  We test goodwill at the reporting unit level and other intangibles at the asset level.  Fair value is the amount at which an asset or liability could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.  Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available.  In the absence of quoted prices for identical or similar assets in active markets, we estimate fair value using various internal and external valuation methods.  We amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their respective estimated lives to their estimated residual values.  We also review the lives of the amortizable intangibles with finite lives on an annual basis.

Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities

We have several trust funds with significant investments intended to provide for future payments of pension and OPEB benefits, nuclear decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel disposal.  All of our trust funds’ investments are diversified and managed in compliance with all laws and regulations.  Our investment strategy for trust funds is to use a diversified portfolio of investments to achieve an acceptable rate of return while managing the interest rate sensitivity of the assets relative to the associated liabilities.  To minimize investment risk, the trust funds are broadly diversified among classes of assets, investment strategies and investment managers.  We regularly review the actual asset allocations and periodically rebalance the investments to targeted allocations when appropriate.  Investment policies and guidelines allow investment managers in approved strategies to use financial derivatives to obtain or manage market exposures and to hedge assets and liabilities.  The investments are reported at fair value under the “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” accounting guidance.


75


Benefit Plans

All benefit plan assets are invested in accordance with each plan’s investment policy.  The investment policy outlines the investment objectives, strategies and target asset allocations by plan.

The investment philosophies for our benefit plans support the allocation of assets to minimize risks and optimize net returns.  Strategies used include:

Maintaining a long-term investment horizon.
Diversifying assets to help control volatility of returns at acceptable levels.
Managing fees, transaction costs and tax liabilities to maximize investment earnings.
Using active management of investments where appropriate risk/return opportunities exist.
Keeping portfolio structure style-neutral to limit volatility compared to applicable benchmarks.
Using alternative asset classes such as real estate and private equity to maximize return and provide additional portfolio diversification.
 
The investment policy for the pension fund allocates assets based on the funded status of the pension plan.  The objective of the asset allocation policy is to reduce the investment volatility of the plan over time.  Generally, more of the investment mix will be allocated to fixed income investments as the plan becomes better funded.  Assets will be transferred away from equity investments into fixed income investments based on the market value of plan assets compared to the plan’s projected benefit obligation.  The current target asset allocations are as follows:
Pension Plan Assets
 
Target
Equity
 
30.0
%
Fixed Income
 
55.0
%
Other Investments
 
15.0
%
 
 
 
OPEB Plans Assets
 
Target
Equity
 
65.0
%
Fixed Income
 
33.0
%
Cash
 
2.0
%

The investment policy for each benefit plan contains various investment limitations.  The investment policies establish concentration limits for securities and prohibit the purchase of securities issued by AEP (with the exception of proportionate and immaterial holdings of AEP securities in passive index strategies).  However, our investment policies do not preclude the benefit trust funds from receiving contributions in the form of AEP securities, provided that the AEP securities acquired by each plan may not exceed the limitations imposed by law.  Each investment manager's portfolio is compared to a diversified benchmark index.

For equity investments, the limits are as follows:

No security in excess of 5% of all equities.
Cash equivalents must be less than 10% of an investment manager's equity portfolio.
No individual stock may be more than 10% and 7% for pension and OPEB investments, respectively, of each manager's equity portfolio.
No investment in excess of 5% of an outstanding class of any company.
No securities may be bought or sold on margin or other use of leverage.


76


For fixed income investments, the concentration limits must not exceed:

3% in any single issuer.
5% for private placements.
5% for convertible securities.
60% for bonds rated AA+ or lower.
50% for bonds rated A+ or lower.
10% for bonds rated BBB- or lower.

For obligations of non-government issuers within the fixed income portfolio, the following limitations apply:

AAA rated debt: a single issuer should account for no more than 5% of the portfolio.
AA+, AA, AA- rated debt: a single issuer should account for no more than 3% of the portfolio.
Debt rated A+ or lower:  a single issuer should account for no more than 2% of the portfolio.
No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in high yield and emerging market debt combined at any time.

A portion of the pension assets is invested in real estate funds to provide diversification, add return and hedge against inflation.  Real estate properties are illiquid, difficult to value and not actively traded.  The pension plan uses external real estate investment managers to invest in commingled funds that hold real estate properties.  To mitigate investment risk in the real estate portfolio, commingled real estate funds are used to ensure that holdings are diversified by region, property type and risk classification.  Real estate holdings include core, value-added and development risk classifications and some investments in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), which are publicly traded real estate securities.

A portion of the pension assets is invested in private equity.  Private equity investments add return and provide diversification and typically require a long-term time horizon to evaluate investment performance.  Private equity is classified as an alternative investment because it is illiquid, difficult to value and not actively traded.  The pension plan uses limited partnerships and commingled funds to invest across the private equity investment spectrum.   Our private equity holdings are with multiple general partners who help monitor the investments and provide investment selection expertise.  The holdings are currently comprised of venture capital, buyout and hybrid debt and equity investment instruments.  Commingled private equity funds are used to enhance the holdings’ diversity.

We participate in a securities lending program with BNY Mellon to provide incremental income on idle assets and to provide income to offset custody fees and other administrative expenses.  We lend securities to borrowers approved by BNY Mellon in exchange for collateral.  All loans are collateralized by at least 102% of the loaned asset’s market value and the collateral is invested.  The difference between the rebate owed to the borrower and the collateral rate of return determines the earnings on the loaned security.  The securities lending program’s objective is providing modest incremental income with a limited increase in risk.

We hold trust owned life insurance (TOLI) underwritten by The Prudential Insurance Company in the OPEB plan trusts.  The strategy for holding life insurance contracts in the taxable Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust is to minimize taxes paid on the asset growth in the trust.  Earnings on plan assets are tax-deferred within the TOLI contract and can be tax-free if held until claims are paid.  Life insurance proceeds remain in the trust and are used to fund future retiree medical benefit liabilities.  With consideration to other investments held in the trust, the cash value of the TOLI contracts is invested in two diversified funds.  A portion is invested in a commingled fund with underlying investments in stocks that are actively traded on major international equity exchanges.  The other portion of the TOLI cash value is invested in a diversified, commingled fixed income fund with underlying investments in government bonds, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities.


77


Cash and cash equivalents are held in each trust to provide liquidity and meet short-term cash needs. Cash equivalent funds are used to provide diversification and preserve principal.  The underlying holdings in the cash funds are investment grade money market instruments including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, treasury bills and other types of investment grade short-term debt securities.  The cash funds are valued each business day and provide daily liquidity.

Nuclear Trust Funds

Nuclear decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel trust funds represent funds that regulatory commissions allow us to collect through rates to fund future decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel disposal liabilities.  By rules or orders, the IURC, the MPSC and the FERC established investment limitations and general risk management guidelines.  In general, limitations include:

Acceptable investments (rated investment grade or above when purchased).
Maximum percentage invested in a specific type of investment.
Prohibition of investment in obligations of AEP or its affiliates.
Withdrawals permitted only for payment of decommissioning costs and trust expenses.

We maintain trust records for each regulatory jurisdiction. Regulatory approval is required to withdraw decommissioning funds.  These funds are managed by external investment managers who must comply with the guidelines and rules of the applicable regulatory authorities.  The trust assets are invested to optimize the net of tax earnings of the trust giving consideration to liquidity, risk, diversification and other prudent investment objectives.

We record securities held in these trust funds as Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on the balance sheets.  We record these securities at fair value.  We classify securities in the trust funds as available-for-sale due to their long-term purpose.  Other-than-temporary impairments for investments in both debt and equity securities are considered realized losses as a result of securities being managed by an external investment management firm.  The external investment management firm makes specific investment decisions regarding the debt and equity investments held in these trusts and generally intends to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position as part of a tax optimization strategy.  Impairments reduce the cost basis of the securities which will affect any future unrealized gain or realized gain or loss due to the adjusted cost of investment.  We record unrealized gains and other-than-temporary impairments from securities in these trust funds as adjustments to the regulatory liability account for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds and to regulatory assets or liabilities for the SNF disposal trust funds in accordance with their treatment in rates.  Consequently, changes in fair value of trust assets do not affect earnings or AOCI.  See the “Nuclear Contingencies” section of Note 6 for additional discussion of nuclear matters.  See “Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal” section of Note 11 for disclosure of the fair value of assets within the trusts.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from nonowner sources.  It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.  Comprehensive income (loss) has two components: net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss).

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2014 , we had performance units and restricted stock units outstanding under the Amended and Restated American Electric Power System Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).  This plan was last approved by shareholders in April 2010.  Upon vesting, performance units are paid in cash and restricted stock units are settled in AEP Common Shares, except for restricted stock units granted after January 1, 2013 and vesting to executive officers, which are paid in cash.


78


We maintain a variety of tax qualified and nonqualified deferred compensation plans for employees and non-employee directors that include, among other options, an investment in or an investment return equivalent to that of AEP common stock.  This includes career share accounts maintained under the American Electric Power System Stock Ownership Requirement Plan, which facilitates executives in meeting minimum stock ownership requirements assigned to them by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors.  Career shares are derived from vested performance units granted to employees under the LTIP.  Career shares are equal in value to shares of AEP common stock and become payable to executives in cash after their service ends.  Career shares accrue additional dividend shares in an amount equal to dividends paid on AEP Common shares, and are reinvested in such shares at the closing market price on the dividend payments date.

We compensate our non-employee directors, in part, with stock units under the American Electric Power Company, Inc. Stock Unit Accumulation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.  These stock units become payable in cash to directors after their service ends.

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors, including stock options, based on estimated fair values. For share-based payment awards with service only vesting conditions, we recognize compensation expense using the straight-line single-option method.  Stock-based compensation expense recognized on the statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest.  Therefore, stock-based compensation expense has been reduced to reflect estimated forfeitures.  Accounting guidance for “Compensation - Stock Compensation” requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

For the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , compensation expense is included in Net Income for the performance units, career shares, restricted stock units and the non-employee director’s stock units.  See Note 15 for additional discussion.

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Shown below are income statement amounts attributable to AEP common shareholders:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Amounts Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Net Income
 
$
1,638

 
$
1,484

 
$
1,262

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
4

 
4

 
3

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
1,634

 
$
1,480

 
$
1,259


Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding common shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options and awards.

79



The following table presents our basic and diluted EPS calculations included on the statements of income:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions, except per share data)
 
 
 
 
$/share
 
 
 
$/share
 
 
 
$/share
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
 
$
1,634

 
 
 
$
1,480

 
 
 
$
1,259

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding
 
488.6

 
$
3.34

 
486.6

 
$
3.04

 
484.7

 
$
2.60

Weighted Average Dilutive Effect of Restricted Stock Units
 
0.3

 

 
0.4

 

 
0.4

 

Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares Outstanding
 
488.9

 
$
3.34

 
487.0

 
$
3.04

 
485.1

 
$
2.60


There were no antidilutive shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .

OPCo Revised Depreciation Rates

Effective December 1, 2011, we revised book depreciation rates for certain of OPCo’s generation plants consistent with shortened depreciable lives for the generating units.  This change in depreciable lives resulted in a $52 million increase in depreciation expense in 2012.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, we impaired certain Ohio generating units (see Note 7 ).  As a result of this impairment of the full book value of these assets, we ceased depreciation on these generating units effective December 1, 2012.

In the second quarter of 2013, we impaired Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (MR5).  As a result of this impairment of the full book value of this generating unit, we ceased depreciation on MR5 effective July 1, 2013.

The effect of these revised depreciation rates and impairments is reported in the Generation & Marketing segment.

Supplementary Related Party Information

AEP and several nonaffiliated utility companies jointly own OVEC.  As of December 31, 2014 , AEP’s ownership and investment in OVEC were 43.47% and $4.4 million , respectively.

OVEC’s owners are members to an intercompany power agreement.  Participants of this agreement are entitled to receive and obligated to pay for all OVEC generating capacity, approximately 2,200 MWs, in proportion to their respective power participation ratios.  The aggregate power participation ratio of certain AEP utility subsidiaries is 43.47% .  The proceeds from the sale of power by OVEC are designed to be sufficient for OVEC to meet its operating expenses and fixed costs and provide a return on capital.  The intercompany power agreement ends in June 2040.
 
AEP and other nonaffiliated owners authorized environmental investments related to their ownership interests. OVEC financed capital expenditures totaling $1.3 billion in connection with the engineering and construction of FGD projects and the associated waste disposal landfills at its two generation plants.  These environmental projects were funded through debt issuances.  As of December 31, 2014 , both generation plants were operating with environmental controls.


80


The following details related party transactions for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Related Party Transactions
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
AEP Consolidated Revenues – Other Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVEC – Barging and Other Transportation Services
 
$
24

 
$
21

 
$
30

AEP Consolidated Expenses – Purchased Electricity for Resale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVEC
 
268

 
289

 
273


Supplementary Income Statement Information

The following table provides the components of Depreciation and Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Depreciation and Amortization
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
1,605

 
$
1,472

 
$
1,505

Amortization of Certain Securitized Assets
 
310

 
248

 
224

Amortization of Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
14

 
23

 
53

Total Depreciation and Amortization
 
$
1,929

 
$
1,743

 
$
1,782


Supplementary Cash Flow Information
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Cash Flow Information
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Cash Paid (Received) for:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
838

 
$
882

 
$
931

Income Taxes
 
117

 
(55
)
 
(82
)
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
135

 
182

 
63

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
559

 
492

 
439

Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
45

 

 
35

Assumption of Liabilities Related to Acquisitions
 

 

 
56

Expected Reimbursement for Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Cask Storage
 
3

 
4

 
30



81


2 .   NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Upon issuance of final pronouncements, we review the new accounting literature to determine its relevance, if any, to our business. The following final pronouncements will impact our financial statements.

ASU 2014-08 “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant and Equipment” (ASU 2014-08)

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08 changing the presentation of discontinued operations on the statements of income and other requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new standard, a disposal of a component or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when the component meets the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale or is disposed. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations and disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations. This standard must be prospectively applied to all reporting periods presented in financial reports issued after the effective date.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. If applicable, this standard will change the presentation of our financial statements but will not affect the calculation of net income, comprehensive income or earnings per share. We adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. We expect no impact on the financial statements in the first quarter of 2015.

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. As applicable, this standard may change the amount of revenue recognized in the income statements in each reporting period. We are analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on revenue or net income. We plan to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2017.

ASU 2015-01 “Income Statement Extraordinary and Unusual Items” (ASU 2015-01)

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01 eliminating the concept of extraordinary items for presentation on the face of the income statement. Under the new standard, a material event or transaction that is unusual in nature, infrequent or both shall be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Alternatively, it may be disclosed in the notes to financial statements.
 
The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted if applied from the beginning of a fiscal year. As applicable, this standard may change the presentation of amounts in the income statements. We plan to adopt ASU 2015-01 effective January 1, 2016.

82


3 .   COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

The following tables provide the components of changes in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  All amounts in the following tables are presented net of related income taxes.
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Securities Available for Sale
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
 
$

 
$
(23
)
 
$
7

 
$
134

 
$
(233
)
 
$
(115
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
 
(10
)
 

 
1

 

 
1

 
(8
)
Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
 
11

 
4

 

 
5

 

 
20

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income
 
1

 
4

 
1

 
5

 
1

 
12

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
 
$
1

 
$
(19
)
 
$
8

 
$
139

 
$
(232
)
 
$
(103
)
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Securities Available for Sale
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
 
$
(8
)
 
$
(30
)
 
$
4

 
$
112

 
$
(415
)
 
$
(337
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
 
10

 
2

 
3

 

 
177

 
192

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
 
(2
)
 
5

 

 
22

 

 
25

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income
 
8

 
7

 
3

 
22

 
177

 
217

Pension and OPEB Adjustment Related to Mitchell Plant
 

 

 

 

 
5

 
5

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
 
$

 
$
(23
)
 
$
7

 
$
134

 
$
(233
)
 
$
(115
)


83


Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table provides details of reclassifications from AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  The amortization of pension and OPEB AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and OPEB costs.  See Note 8 for additional details.
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss
Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in millions)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues
 
$

 
$
(1
)
Generation & Marketing Revenues
 
59

 
(10
)
Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
(39
)
 
8

Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(3
)
 

Subtotal  Commodity
 
17

 
(3
)
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
6

 
7

Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
6

 
7

 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
23

 
4

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
8

 
1

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
15

 
3

 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
(21
)
 
(21
)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
29

 
55

Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
8

 
34

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
3

 
12

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
5

 
22

 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
20

 
$
25


(a)
Represents realized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets. 
 

84


The following table provides details on designated, effective cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets and the reasons for changes in cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2012 .  All amounts in the following table are presented net of related income taxes.
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Activity for Cash Flow Hedges
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2011
$
(3
)
 
$
(20
)
 
$
(23
)
Changes in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
(15
)
 
(14
)
 
(29
)
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Reclassified from AOCI
to Statement of Income/within Balance Sheet:
 
 
 
 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues

 

 

Generation & Marketing Revenues
(5
)
 

 
(5
)
Purchased Electricity for Resale
13

 

 
13

Other Operation Expense

 

 

Maintenance Expense

 

 

Interest Expense

 
4

 
4

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

 

Regulatory Assets (a)
2

 

 
2

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
(8
)
 
$
(30
)
 
$
(38
)

(a)
Represents realized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.

The following table provides details of changes in unrealized gains and losses related to securities available for sale and the reasons for changes for the year ended December 31, 2012 .  All amounts in the following table are presented net of related income taxes.
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Activity for Securities Available for Sale
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
(in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2011
$
2

Changes in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
2

Amount of (Gain) or Loss Reclassified from AOCI to Statement of Income:
 
    Interest Income

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
4


85


4 .   RATE MATTERS

Our subsidiaries are involved in rate and regulatory proceedings at the FERC and their state commissions.  Rate matters can have a material impact on net income, cash flows and possibly financial condition.  Our recent significant rate orders and pending rate filings are addressed in this note.

OPCo Rate Matters

Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings

2009 – 2011 ESP

The PUCO issued an order in March 2009 that modified and approved the ESP which established rates at the start of the April 2009 billing cycle through 2011. OPCo collected the 2009 annualized revenue increase over the last nine months of 2009. The order also provided a phase-in FAC, which was authorized to be recovered through a non-bypassable surcharge over the period 2012 through 2018. The PUCO’s March 2009 order was appealed to the Supreme Court of Ohio, which issued an opinion and remanded certain issues back to the PUCO.

In October 2011, the PUCO issued an order in the remand proceeding, which was subsequently appealed. In February 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the PUCO’s decision and rejected all appeals.
 
In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate proceeding which implemented a PIRR to recover deferred fuel costs in rates beginning September 2012. The PUCO ruled that carrying charges should be calculated without an offset for accumulated deferred income taxes and that a long-term debt rate should be applied when collections begin. In November 2012, OPCo appealed that PUCO order to the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming a long-term debt rate modified the previously adjudicated 2009 - 2011 ESP order, which granted a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) rate. In November 2012, the IEU and the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) also filed appeals of the PUCO decision which principally argued that the PUCO should have reduced the deferred fuel balance to reflect the prior “improper” collection of POLR revenues. IEU's appeal also argued that carrying costs should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit which, as of December 31, 2014 , could reduce carrying costs by $26 million including $14 million of unrecognized equity carrying costs. In December 2014, IEU filed a motion to withdraw its argument related to the collection of POLR revenues. In January 2015, the OCC filed a request to dismiss its appeal altogether. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Ohio were held in February 2015. OPCo argued for a remand to reinstate the WACC carrying charges initially approved by the PUCO and challenged the IEU argument that the carrying charges should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit. A decision from the Supreme Court of Ohio is pending.

Management is unable to predict the outcome of the unresolved litigation discussed above. Depending on the rulings in these proceedings, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

June 2012 – May 2015 ESP Including Capacity Charge

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order which adopted and modified a new ESP that established base generation rates through May 2015. This ruling was generally upheld in rehearing orders in January and March 2013.

In July 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate capacity proceeding which stated that OPCo must charge CRES providers the RPM price and authorized OPCo to defer a portion of its incurred capacity costs not recovered from CRES providers up to $188.88 /MW day.  The OPCo RPM price collected from CRES providers, which includes reserve margins, was approximately $34 /MW day through May 2014 and is $150 /MW day from June 2014 through May 2015.  In December 2012, various parties filed notices of appeal of the capacity costs decision with the Supreme Court of Ohio.


86


As part of the August 2012 ESP order, the PUCO established a non-bypassable RSR, effective September 2012.  The RSR was collected from customers at $3.50 /MWh through May 2014 and is currently collected at $4.00 /MWh for the period June 2014 through May 2015, with $1.00 /MWh applied to the recovery of deferred capacity costs.  As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo’s incurred deferred capacity costs balance of $422 million , including debt carrying costs, was recorded in regulatory assets on the balance sheet.

In 2013, the PUCO issued its Orders on Rehearing for the ESP which generally upheld its August 2012 order, including the implementation of the RSR. The PUCO clarified that a final reconciliation of revenues and expenses would be permitted for any over- or under-recovery on several riders including fuel. In addition, the PUCO addressed certain issues around the energy auctions while other SSO issues related to the energy auctions were deferred to a separate docket related to the competitive bid process (CBP). In 2013, OPCo and various intervenors filed appeals with the Supreme Court of Ohio challenging portions of the PUCO’s ESP order, including the RSR.

In November 2013, the PUCO issued an order approving OPCo’s CBP with modifications. As ordered, in 2014, OPCo conducted multiple energy-only auctions for a total of 100% of the SSO load with delivery beginning April 2014 through May 2015. For delivery starting in June 2015, OPCo will conduct energy and capacity auctions for its entire SSO load. The PUCO also approved the unbundling of the FAC into fixed and energy-related components and an intervenor proposal to blend the $188.88 /MW day capacity price in proportion to the percentage of energy planned to be auctioned. Additionally, the PUCO ordered that intervenor concerns related to the recovery of the fixed fuel costs through potentially both the FAC and the approved capacity charges be addressed in subsequent FAC proceedings. Management believes that these intervenor concerns are without merit.

In January 2014, the PUCO denied all rehearing requests and agreed to issue a supplemental request for an independent auditor in the 2012 - 2013 FAC proceeding to separately examine the recovery of the fixed fuel costs, including OVEC. In March 2014, the PUCO approved OPCo’s request to implement riders related to the unbundling of the FAC. In October 2014, the independent auditor, selected by the PUCO, filed its report for the period August 2012 through May 2015 with the PUCO. If the PUCO ultimately concludes that a portion of the fixed fuel costs are also recovered through OPCo's $188.88/MW day capacity charge, the independent auditor recommends a methodology for calculating a refund of a portion of certain fixed fuel costs. The retail share of these fixed fuel costs is approximately $90 million annually. A hearing related to this matter has not been scheduled. Management believes that no over-recovery of costs has occurred and intends to oppose the findings in the audit report.
 
If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Proposed June 2015 – May 2018 ESP

In December 2013, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO to approve an ESP that includes proposed rate adjustments and the continuation and modification of certain existing riders, including the Distribution Investment Rider (DIR), effective June 2015 through May 2018. The proposal included a return on common equity of 10.65% on capital costs for certain riders and estimates an average decrease in rates of 9% over the three-year term of the plan for customers who receive their RPM capacity and energy auction-based generation through OPCo. The proposal also included a purchased power agreement (PPA) rider that would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based purchase power agreement. The PPA would initially be based upon the OVEC contractual entitlement and could, upon further approval, be expanded to include other contracts involving other Ohio legacy generation assets. In May 2014, intervenors and the PUCO staff filed testimony that provided various recommendations including the rejection and/or modification of various riders, including the DIR and the proposed PPA. Hearings at the PUCO in the ESP case were held in June 2014.


87


In July 2014, OPCo submitted a separate application to continue the RSR established in the June 2012 - May 2015 ESP to collect the unrecovered portion of the deferred capacity costs at the rate of $4.00 /MWh until the balance of the capacity deferrals has been collected. In December 2014, the PUCO staff and intervenors filed comments related to the RSR application. The PUCO staff recommended approval of the application. Intervenors objected to the application and recommended approval of a pending motion to dismiss.

In October 2014, OPCo filed a separate application with the PUCO to propose a new extended PPA for inclusion in the PPA rider, discussed above. The new PPA would include an additional 2,671 MW to be purchased from AGR over the life of the respective generating units.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Significantly Excessive Earnings Test Filings

In January 2011, the PUCO issued an order on the 2009 SEET filing. The order gave consideration for a future commitment to invest $20 million to support the development of a large solar farm. In January 2013, the PUCO found there was not a need for the large solar farm. The PUCO noted that OPCo remains obligated to spend $20 million on this solar project or another project. In September 2013, a proposed second phase of OPCo’s gridSMART ® program was filed with the PUCO which included a proposed project to satisfy this PUCO directive. A decision from the PUCO is pending.

In March 2014, the PUCO approved a stipulation agreement between OPCo and the PUCO staff that there were no significantly excessive earnings in 2011 for CSPCo or OPCo. In May 2014 and December 2014, the PUCO approved stipulation agreements between OPCo and the PUCO staff that there were no significantly excessive earnings for OPCo in 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of 2014 SEET requirements.

Corporate Separation

In October 2012, the PUCO issued an order which approved the corporate separation of OPCo’s generation assets including the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets and associated generation liabilities at net book value to AGR. In June 2013, the IEU filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming the PUCO order approving the corporate separation was unlawful. A decision from the Supreme Court of Ohio is pending. In December 2013, corporate separation of OPCo’s generation assets was completed. If any part of the PUCO order is overturned, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Storm Damage Recovery Rider (SDRR)

In December 2012, OPCo submitted an application with the PUCO to establish initial SDRR rates to recover 2012 incremental storm distribution expenses. In April 2014, the PUCO approved a stipulation agreement to recover $55 million over a 12-month period. The agreement also provided that carrying charges using a long-term debt rate will be assessed from April 2013 until recovery begins, but no additional carrying charges will accrue during the actual recovery period. Compliance tariffs were filed with the PUCO and new rates were implemented in April 2014. In May 2014, the PUCO upheld the settlement agreement on rehearing.
 

88


2009 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audit

In January 2012, the PUCO issued an order in OPCo’s 2009 FAC that the remaining $65 million in proceeds from a 2008 coal contract settlement agreement be applied against OPCo’s under-recovered fuel balance. In April 2012, on rehearing, the PUCO ordered that the settlement credit only needed to reflect the Ohio retail jurisdictional share of the gain not already flowed through the FAC with carrying charges. As a result, OPCo recorded a $30 million net favorable adjustment on the statement of income in 2012. The January 2012 PUCO order also stated that a consultant should be hired to review the coal reserve valuation and recommend whether any additional value should benefit ratepayers.

In August 2012, intervenors filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming the settlement credit ordered by the PUCO should have reflected the remaining gain not already flowed through the FAC, with carrying charges. In September 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio upheld the PUCO order. A review of the coal reserve valuation by an outside consultant is still pending. If the PUCO ultimately determines that additional amounts should benefit ratepayers as a result of the consultant’s review of the coal reserve valuation, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2010 and 2011 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audits

The PUCO-selected outside consultant issued its 2010 and 2011 FAC audit reports which included a recommendation that the PUCO reexamine the carrying costs on the deferred FAC balance and determine whether the carrying costs on the balance should be net of accumulated income taxes with the use of a WACC. In May 2014, the PUCO issued an order that generally approved OPCo's 2010-2011 fuel costs and rejected the auditor recommendation to adjust the WACC carrying charges related to accumulated deferred income taxes. Additionally, the PUCO requested further review related to an affiliate barging agreement and the modification of certain fuel procurement processes and practices. Further, the order provided for the auditor to address any remaining concerns in the next audit report, as deemed necessary. In July 2014, the PUCO issued an order that denied all requests for rehearing.

2012 and 2013 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audits

In May 2014, the PUCO-selected outside consultant provided its final report related to its 2012 and 2013 FAC audit which included certain unfavorable recommendations related to the FAC recovery for 2012 and 2013. These recommendations are opposed by OPCo. In addition, the PUCO will consider the results of the final audit of the recovery of fixed fuel costs that was issued in October 2014. See the "June 2012 - May 2015 ESP Including Capacity Charge" section above. If the PUCO orders a reduction to the FAC deferral or a refund to customers, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Ormet

Ormet, a large aluminum company, had a contract to purchase power from OPCo through 2018. In February 2013, Ormet filed for bankruptcy and subsequently shut down operations in October 2013. Based upon previous PUCO rulings providing rate assistance to Ormet, the PUCO is expected to permit OPCo to recover unpaid Ormet amounts through the Economic Development Rider (EDR), except where recovery from ratepayers is limited to $20 million related to previously deferred payments from Ormet’s October and November 2012 power bills. In February 2014, a stipulation agreement between OPCo and Ormet was filed with the PUCO. The stipulation recommended approval of OPCo’s right to fully recover approximately $49 million of foregone revenues through the EDR. Intervenor comments were also filed objecting to full recovery of these foregone revenues. In March 2014, the PUCO issued an order in OPCo’s EDR filing allowing OPCo to include $39 million of Ormet-related foregone revenues in the EDR effective April 2014. The order stated that if the stipulation agreement between OPCo and Ormet is subsequently adopted by the PUCO, OPCo could file an application to modify the EDR rate for the remainder of the period requesting recovery of the remaining $10 million of Ormet deferrals which, as of December 31, 2014 , is recorded in regulatory assets on the balance sheet. In April 2014, an intervenor filed testimony objecting to $5 million of the remaining foregone revenues. A hearing at the PUCO related to the stipulation agreement was held in May 2014.

89


In addition, in the 2009 - 2011 ESP proceeding, intervenors requested that OPCo be required to refund the Ormet-related revenues under a previous interim arrangement (effective from January 2009 through September 2009) and requested that the PUCO prevent OPCo from collecting Ormet-related revenues in the future. Through September 2009, the last month of the interim arrangement, OPCo had $64 million of deferred FAC costs related to the interim arrangement, excluding $2 million of unrecognized equity carrying costs. The PUCO did not take any action on this request. The intervenors raised this issue again in response to OPCo’s November 2009 filing to approve recovery of the deferral under the interim agreement.

To the extent amounts discussed above are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.
 
Ohio IGCC Plant

In 2005, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO seeking authority to recover costs of building and operating an IGCC power plant. As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo has collected $24 million in pre-construction costs authorized in a 2006 PUCO order. Intervenors filed motions and comments with the PUCO requesting that OPCo refund all collected pre-construction costs to Ohio ratepayers with interest. In December 2014, a stipulation agreement between OPCo, the PUCO staff and intervenors was filed at the PUCO. The parties to the stipulation agreement proposed that OPCo will refund $13 million to its customers. In February 2015, the PUCO approved the stipulation agreement.

SWEPCo Rate Matters

2012 Texas Base Rate Case
 
In July 2012, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT to increase annual base rates primarily due to the completion of the Turk Plant. In October 2013, the PUCT issued an order affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant but determined that the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap established in a previous Certificate of Convenience and Necessity case also limited SWEPCo’s recovery of AFUDC in addition to limits on its recovery of cash construction costs. Additionally, the PUCT deferred consideration of the requested increase in depreciation expense related to the change in the 2016 retirement date of the Welsh Plant, Unit 2. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Unit 2 was $84 million , before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP. See “Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016” section of Note 5 .

Upon rehearing in January 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, SWEPCo reversed $114 million of previously recorded regulatory disallowances. The resulting annual base rate increase is approximately $52 million . In March 2014, the PUCT issued an order related to the January 2014 PUCT ruling and in April 2014, this order became final. In May 2014, intervenors filed appeals of that order with the Texas District Court. In June 2014, SWEPCo intervened in those appeals and filed initial responses.

If certain parts of the PUCT order are overturned or if SWEPCo cannot ultimately recover its Texas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant investment, including AFUDC, or its retirement-related costs and potential fuel or replacement power disallowances related to Welsh Plant, Unit 2, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Texas Transmission Cost Recovery Factor Filing

In May 2014, SWEPCo filed an application with the PUCT to implement its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) requesting additional annual revenue of $15 million . The TCRF is designed to recover increases from the amounts included in SWEPCo’s Texas retail base rates for transmission infrastructure improvement costs and wholesale transmission charges under a tariff approved by the FERC. SWEPCo’s application included Turk Plant transmission-related costs. In November 2014, the PUCT issued an order approving a proposal for decision, issued by an Administrative Law Judge in October 2014, that recommended approval of SWEPCo's application with an increase in annual revenue of $14 million . In December 2014, the PUCT order became final and TCRF rates were implemented.

90


2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In 2012, SWEPCo initiated a proceeding to establish new formula base rates in Louisiana, including recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share (approximately 29% ) of the Turk Plant. In February 2013, a settlement was filed and approved by the LPSC. The settlement increased Louisiana total rates by approximately $2 million annually, effective March 2013, which consisted of an increase in base rates of approximately $85 million annually offset by a decrease in fuel and other rates of approximately $83 million annually.  The March 2013 base rates are based on a 10% return on common equity and cost recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant and Stall Unit. The rates are subject to refund based on the staff review of the cost of service and the prudency review of the Turk Plant. The settlement also provided that the LPSC review base rates in 2014 and 2015 and that SWEPCo recover non-fuel Turk Plant costs and a full weighted-average cost of capital return on the prudently incurred Turk Plant investment in jurisdictional rate base, effective January 2013. In December 2014, the LPSC approved a settlement agreement related to the staff review of the cost of service. The settlement agreement reduced the requested revenue increase by $3 million , primarily due to the timing of both the allowed recovery of certain existing regulatory assets and the establishment of a regulatory asset for certain previously expensed costs. If the LPSC orders refunds based upon the pending prudence review of the Turk Plant investment, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2014 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In April 2014, SWEPCo filed its annual formula rate plan for test year 2013 with the LPSC.  The filing included a $5 million annual increase, which was effective August 2014.  SWEPCo also proposed to increase rates by an additional $15 million annually, effective January 2015, for a total annual increase of $20 million . This additional increase reflects the cost of incremental generation to be used to serve Louisiana customers in 2015 due to the expiration of a purchase power agreement attributable to Louisiana customers.  In December 2014, the LPSC approved a partial settlement agreement that included the implementation of the $15 million annual increase in rates effective January 2015. These increases are subject to LPSC staff review and are subject to refund.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 - Environmental Projects

To comply with pending Federal EPA regulations, SWEPCo is currently constructing environmental control projects to meet mercury and air toxics standards for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 at a cost of approximately $410 million , excluding AFUDC.  Management currently estimates that the total environmental projects to be completed through 2020 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 will cost approximately $600 million , excluding AFUDC.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has incurred costs of $164 million and has remaining contractual construction obligations of $108 million related to these projects.  SWEPCo will seek recovery of these project costs from customers through filings at the state commissions and the FERC. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $388 million , before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. 

  APCo and WPCo Rate Matters

Plant Transfer

APCo and WPCo provide retail electric service at bundled rates approved by the WVPSC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis, to their respective customers. West Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through an expanded net energy cost which trues-up to actual expenses. In March 2014, APCo and WPCo filed a request with the WVPSC for approval to transfer at net book value to WPCo a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, comprising 780 MW of average annual generating capacity presently owned by AGR. In April 2014, APCo and WPCo filed testimony that supported their request and proposed a base rate surcharge of $113 million , to be offset by an equal reduction in the ENEC revenues, to be effective upon the transfer of the Mitchell Plant to WPCo until APCo's West Virginia base rates are updated. See the "2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case" below. In June 2014, the FERC issued an order approving a request by AGR and WPCo to transfer AGR’s one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo.


91


In October 2014, a stipulation agreement between APCo, WPCo, the WVPSC staff and intervenors in the case was filed with the WVPSC. The stipulation agreement recommended approval for WPCo to acquire, at net book value, the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, excluding certain assets, and to pay AGR $20 million upon transfer, which WPCo will record as a regulatory asset, include in rate base and recover over the life of the plant. Additionally, the agreement stated that 82.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest will be reflected in rates effective from the date of the transfer via a surcharge with an offset in ENEC revenues of $93 million . The remaining 17.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest is to be included in rates by January 2020. The agreement also proposed that WPCo share the energy margins for 82.5% of the plant’s output with ratepayers and that WPCo retain all of the energy margins from sales into the wholesale market on the remaining 17.5% , to offset fixed costs associated with this portion, until the remaining portion is included in rates. In December 2014, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications related to 82.5% of the energy and capacity margin sharing. The WVPSC determined that the sharing mechanism that was proposed is reasonable and will be adopted provided the result of the sharing mechanism will be adjusted, if necessary, so that the sharing mechanism does not result in a net cost to ratepayers that exceeds the actual variable cost of generation. In January 2015, the transfer of the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo was completed.

2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case

In March 2014, APCo filed a biennial generation and distribution base rate case with the Virginia SCC. In accordance with a Virginia statute, APCo did not request a change in base rates as its Virginia retail combined rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013 was within the statutory range of the approved return on common equity of 10.9% . The filing included a request to decrease generation depreciation rates, effective February 2015, primarily due to changes in the expected service lives of various generating units and the extended recovery through 2040 of the net book value of certain planned 2015 plant retirements. Additionally, the filing included a request to amortize $7 million annually for two years, beginning February 2015, related to IGCC and other deferred costs. APCo also requested approval to amortize $38 million related to an accumulated deferred Virginia state income tax (ADVSIT) liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015.

In November 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order concluding that APCo's adjusted earned rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013, reflecting their ordered adjustments, was above the allowed threshold. The order included (a) a $6 million refund to customers for the years 2012 through 2013, (b) the write-off of $10 million of IGCC pre-construction costs, (c) approval to amortize a $38 million ADVSIT liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015 and (d) no change to generation depreciation rates with rates to be reviewed again in the next biennial rate case. The order also approved a new return on common equity of 9.7% effective for 2014 and 2015. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of this order for 2014.

The Virginia SCC did not rule on a Virginia SCC staff recommendation to write-down certain costs, for ratemaking purposes, for the biennial period based on APCo’s earnings within the statutory equity range. In January 2015, the Virginia SCC initiated a separate proceeding to address the proper treatment of APCo’s authorized regulatory assets. As of December 31, 2014, APCo’s authorized regulatory assets under review in the separate proceeding, based upon the Virginia SCC staff recommendation, are estimated to be $15 million . In February 2015, initial briefs related to this proceeding were filed by various parties. If any of these costs, or any additional costs that may be subject to review, are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Potential New Virginia Legislation Affecting Biennial Reviews

In February 2015, amendments to Virginia law governing the regulation of investor-owned electric utilities were approved by the Virginia General Assembly and have been sent to the Governor. If these amendments are enacted, APCo’s existing generation and distribution base rates would freeze until after the Virginia SCC rules on APCo’s next biennial review, which APCo would file in March 2020 for the 2018 and 2019 test years. These amendments would also preclude the Virginia SCC from performing biennial reviews of APCo’s earnings for the years 2014 through 2017. Management continues to monitor this potential new legislation in Virginia.


92


2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case

In June 2014, APCo filed a request with the WVPSC to increase annual base rates by $181 million , based upon a 10.62% return on common equity, to be effective in the second quarter of 2015.  The filing included a request to increase generation depreciation rates primarily due to the increase in plant investment and changes in the expected service lives of various generating units.  The filing also requested recovery of $89 million over five years related to 2012 West Virginia storm costs, IGCC and other deferred costs.  In addition to the base rate request, the filing also included a request to implement a rider of approximately $45 million annually to recover vegetation management costs, including a return on capital investment.  In October 2014, the WVPSC approved APCo's motion to revise the procedural schedule which included a request to change the date of implementation of the new rates to May 2015.  In December 2014 and January 2015, intervenors filed testimony which proposed total annual revenue increases ranging from $35 million to $59 million based upon returns on common equity ranging from 9% to 10% and regulatory asset disallowances ranging from $7 million to $9 million .  Additionally, other intervenors proposed that the revenue requirement be based on a return on common equity of 8.7% and that $89 million of regulatory assets be disallowed.  Intervenors also recommended a disallowance of approximately $44 million related to the December 2013 transfer of OPCo's two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo.  Hearings at the WVPSC were held in January 2015.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2013 Virginia Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause (Transmission RAC)

In December 2013, APCo filed with the Virginia SCC to increase its transmission RAC revenues by $50 million annually to be effective May 2014.  In March 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order approving a stipulation agreement between APCo and the Virginia SCC staff increasing the transmission RAC revenues by $49 million annually, subject to true-up, effective May 2014. Pursuant to the order, the Virginia SCC staff will audit APCo’s transmission RAC under-recoveries and report its findings and recommendations in testimony in APCo’s next transmission RAC proceeding in 2015.

PSO Rate Matters

2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In January 2014, PSO filed a request with the OCC to increase annual base rates by $38 million , based upon a 10.5% return on common equity.  This revenue increase includes a proposed increase in depreciation rates of $29 million .  In addition, the filing proposed recovery of advanced metering costs through a separate rider over a three-year deployment period requesting $7 million of revenues in year one, increasing to $28 million in year three.  The filing also proposed expansion of an existing transmission rider currently recovered in base rates to include additional transmission-related costs that are expected to increase over the next several years.

In April and May 2014, testimony was filed by the OCC staff and intervenors with recommendations that included adjustments to annual base rates ranging from an increase of $16 million to a reduction of $22 million , primarily based upon the determination of depreciation rates and a return on common equity between 9.18% and 9.5% . Additionally, the recommendations did not support the advanced metering rider or the expansion of the transmission rider. In May 2014, PSO filed rebuttal testimony that included an updated annual base rate increase request of $42 million to reflect certain updated costs.

In June 2014, a non-unanimous stipulation agreement between PSO, the OCC staff and certain intervenors was filed with the OCC. The parties to the stipulation recommended no overall change to the transmission rider or to annual revenues, other than additional revenues through a separate rider related to advanced metering costs, and that the terms of the stipulation be effective November 2014. The advanced metering rider would provide $24 million of revenues over 14 months beginning in November 2014 and increase to $27 million in 2016. New depreciation rates are recommended for advanced metering investments and existing meters, also to be effective November 2014. Further, the stipulation recommends a return on common equity of 9.85% to be used only in the formula to calculate AFUDC, factoring of customer receivables and for riders with an equity component. Additionally, the stipulation recommends

93


recovery of regulatory assets for 2013 storms and regulatory case expenses. In July 2014, the Attorney General joined in the stipulation agreement. A hearing at the OCC was held in July 2014. In October 2014, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommended approval of the stipulation agreement and interim rates were implemented in November 2014, subject to refund. In November 2014, intervenors opposing the stipulation agreement filed exceptions to the ALJ's report and oral arguments were held at the OCC in December 2014. An order is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015. If the OCC were to disallow any portion of this settlement agreement, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

I&M Rate Matters
 
2011 Indiana Base Rate Case
 
In February 2013, the IURC issued an order that granted an $85 million annual increase in base rates based upon a return on common equity of 10.2% and adjusted the authorized annual increase in base rates to $92 million in March 2013. In April 2014, the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) filed an appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court related to the inclusion of a prepaid pension asset in rate base, which is approximately $7 million in annual revenues. In August 2014, the Indiana Supreme Court denied the appeal filed by the OUCC.

Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project (LCM Project)

In 2012, I&M filed a petition with the IURC and the MPSC for approval of the LCM Project, which consists of a group of capital projects to ensure the safe and reliable operations of the Cook Plant through its licensed life (2034 for Unit 1 and 2037 for Unit 2). The estimated cost of the LCM Project is $1.2 billion to be incurred through 2018, excluding AFUDC.  As of December 31, 2014 , I&M has incurred costs of $550 million related to the LCM Project, including AFUDC.

In July 2013, the IURC approved I&M’s proposed project with the exception of an estimated $23 million related to certain items that might accommodate a future potential power uprate which the IURC stated I&M could seek recovery of in a subsequent base rate case. I&M will recover approved costs through an LCM rider which will be determined in semi-annual proceedings. The IURC authorized deferral accounting for costs incurred related to certain projects effective January 2012 to the extent such costs are not reflected in rates. In May 2014, the IURC issued a final order approving the LCM rider rates that were implemented in January 2014.

In January 2013, the MPSC approved a Certificate of Need (CON) for the LCM Project and authorized deferral accounting for costs incurred related to the approved projects effective January 2013 until these costs are included in rates. In February 2013, intervenors filed appeals with the Michigan Court of Appeals objecting to the issuance of the CON as well as the amount of the CON related to the LCM Project. In October 2014, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued an order that affirmed the MPSC decision in part, but reversed the portion of the MPSC decision related to certain costs. The order indicated that I&M could recover those costs in a future Michigan base case if they can show that the costs were reasonable and prudent.

If I&M is not ultimately permitted to recover its LCM Project costs, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Tanners Creek Plant

I&M announced that it would retire Tanners Creek Plant by June 2015 to comply with proposed environmental regulations. I&M is currently recovering depreciation and a return on the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant in base rates and plans to seek recovery of all of the plant’s retirement related costs in its next Indiana and Michigan base rate cases.


94


In December 2013, I&M filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 and the Tanners Creek Plant due to the retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant in 2015. Upon the retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant, I&M proposed that, for purposes of determining its depreciation rates, the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant be recovered over the remaining life of the Rockport Plant.

In September 2014, a settlement agreement was approved by the MPSC that included the authorization for I&M to implement revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1, effective upon the retirement date of the Tanners Creek Plant. Upon implementation of the revised depreciation rates, I&M is authorized to reduce customer rates through a credit rider until the revised rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 are included in base rates.

In October 2014, I&M filed a similar application with the IURC seeking approval of revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 and the Tanners Creek Plant. Upon retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant, I&M proposed that, for purposes of determining its depreciation rates, the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant be recovered over the remaining life of the Rockport Plant. The new depreciation rates would result in a decrease in I&M's Indiana jurisdictional electric depreciation expense which I&M proposed to reduce customer rates through a credit rider. In February 2015, the OUCC filed testimony that recommended approval of I&M's application. A hearing at the IURC is scheduled for March 2015.

As of December 31, 2014, the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant was $340 million , before cost of removal, including material and supplies inventory and CWIP.  See “Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016” section of Note 5 . If I&M is ultimately not permitted to fully recover its net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant and its retirement-related costs, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Transmission, Distribution and Storage System Improvement Charge (TDSIC)

In October 2014, I&M filed petitions with the IURC for approval of a TDSIC Rider and approval of I&M’s seven-year TDSIC Plan, from 2015 through 2021, for eligible transmission, distribution and storage system improvements. The initial estimated cost of the capital improvements and associated operation and maintenance expenses included in the TDSIC Plan of $787 million , excluding AFUDC, will be updated annually. The TDSIC Plan included distribution investments specific to the Indiana jurisdiction. The TDSIC Rider will allow the periodic adjustment of I&M's rates to provide for timely recovery of 80% of approved TDSIC Plan costs. I&M will defer the remaining 20% of approved TDSIC Plan costs to be recovered in I&M's next general rate case. I&M is not seeking a rate adjustment in this proceeding but is seeking approval of a TDSIC Rider rate adjustment mechanism for subsequent proceedings. In January 2015, intervenors filed testimony that recommended denial of certain portions of the TDSIC Plan including recommended changes to the capital structure, recovery of requested operation and maintenance cost allocations and the rate design within the TDSIC Rider mechanism. A hearing at the IURC was held in February 2015. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

KPCo Rate Matters

Plant Transfer

In December 2012, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC for approval to transfer at net book value to KPCo a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, comprising 780 MW of average annual generating capacity. KPCo also requested that costs related to the Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 FGD project be established as a regulatory asset. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 was $253 million , before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP. See “Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016” section of Note 5 .

In October 2013, the KPSC issued an order approving a modified settlement agreement between KPCo, Kentucky Industrial Utility Customers, Inc. and the Sierra Club. The modified settlement approved the transfer of a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to KPCo at net book value on December 31, 2013 with the limitation that the net book value of the Mitchell Plant transfer not exceed the amount to be determined by a WVPSC order. In December 2014,

95


the WVPSC issued the Mitchell Plant transfer order with no disallowances. See the "Plant Transfer" disclosure above within the APCo and WPCo Rate Matters section. The modified settlement agreement approved by the KPSC also included the implementation of an Asset Transfer Rider to collect $44 million annually effective January 2014, subject to true-up, and allowed KPCo to retain any off-system sales margins above the $15.3 million annual level in base rates. Additionally, the settlement allows for KPCo to file a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to convert Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 to natural gas, provided the cost is approximately $60 million , and addressed potential greenhouse gas initiatives on the Mitchell Plant. The settlement also approved recovery, including a return, of coal-related retirement costs related to Big Sandy Plant over 25 years when base rates are set (no earlier than June 2015) in the next base rate case, but rejected KPCo’s request to defer FGD project costs for Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2. In December 2013, the transfer of a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to KPCo was completed.

In December 2013, the Attorney General filed an appeal with the Franklin County Circuit Court. In May 2014, KPCo's motion to dismiss the appeal was denied. In May 2014, KPCo filed motions for reconsideration and clarification with the Franklin County Circuit Court. In June 2014, the motion for reconsideration was denied but the motion to clarify was granted, thereby limiting the appeal to the issues of law presented in the Attorney General's appeal. If any part of the KPSC order is overturned, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Kentucky Fuel Adjustment Clause Review

In August 2014, the KPSC issued an order initiating a review of KPCo's FAC from November 2013 through April 2014. In January 2015, the KPSC issued an order disallowing certain FAC costs during the period of January 2014 through May 2015 while KPCo owns and operates both Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 and its one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant. Additionally, the KPSC directed KPCo to refund to customers $13 million of fuel costs, by the end of the second quarter of 2015, collected during the FAC review period of January 2014 through April 2014. As a result of this order, KPCo recorded a regulatory disallowance of $36 million in December 2014. In February 2015, KPCo filed an appeal of this order with the Franklin County Circuit Court.

2014 Kentucky Base Rate Case

In December 2014, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC for an increase in rates of $70 million , which consists of a $75 million increase in rider rates, offset by a $5 million decrease in annual base rates, to be effective July 2015. The net increase reflects KPCo's ownership interest in the Mitchell Plant, riders to recover the Big Sandy Plant retirement and operational costs and the inclusion of an environmental compliance plan related to the Mitchell Plant FGD. Additionally, the filing included a request to recover deferred storm costs. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

96


5 .   EFFECTS OF REGULATION

Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016

The following regulated generating units are probable of abandonment.  Accordingly, CWIP and Plant in Service has been reclassified as Other Property, Plant and Equipment on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 .  The following table summarizes the plant investment and cost of removal, currently being recovered, for each generating unit as of December 31, 2014 .
Plant Name and Unit
 
Company
 
Gross
Investment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Net
Investment
 
Cost of
Removal
Regulatory
Liability
 
Expected
Retirement
Date
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
(in millions)
Tanners Creek Plant, Units 1-4
 
I&M
 
$
711

 
$
384

 
$
327

 
$
89

 
2015
 
16 years
Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2
 
KPCo
 
455

 
208

 
247

 
51

 
2015
 
26 years
Northeastern Station, Unit 4
 
PSO
 
182

 
91

 
91

 
11

 
2016
 
26 years
Welsh Plant, Unit 2
 
SWEPCo
 
175

 
96

 
79

 
20

 
2016
 
26 years
Total
 
 
 
$
1,523

 
$
779

 
$
744

 
$
171

 
 
 
 

In accordance with accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations,” APCo regulated generating units expected to be retired before or during 2016 are not considered probable of abandonment.


97


Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets are comprised of the following items:
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining Recovery Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
(in millions)
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs -  earns a return
 
$
121

 
$
61

 
1 year
Under-recovered Fuel Costs -  does not earn a return
 
6

 
19

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$
127

 
$
80

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Storm Related Costs
 
$
20

 
$
22

 
 
West Virginia Vegetation Management Program
 
20

 

 
 
Ohio Economic Development Rider
 

 
14

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 

 
4

 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Storm Related Costs
 
100

 
161

 
 
Carbon Capture and Storage Product Validation Facility
 
13

 
13

 
 
IGCC Pre-Construction Costs
 
11

 

 
 
Ormet Special Rate Recovery Mechanism
 
10

 
36

 
 
Expanded Net Energy Charge - Coal Inventory
 
3

 
21

 
 
Indiana Under-Recovered Capacity Costs
 

 
22

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
49

 
37

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
226

 
330

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio Capacity Deferral
 
422

 
288

 
4 years
Ohio Fuel Adjustment Clause
 
378

 
445

 
4 years
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
66

 
81

 
29 years
Texas Meter Replacement Costs
 
59

 
77

 
13 years
Ohio Distribution Decoupling
 
35

 
31

 
2 years
Ohio Transmission Cost Recovery Rider
 
28

 
87

 
2 years
Storm Related Costs
 
13

 
17

 
4 years
Red Rock Generating Facility
 
10

 
10

 
42 years
RTO Formation/Integration Costs
 
9

 
12

 
5 years
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
21

 
18

 
various
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes, Net
 
1,268

 
1,390

 
53 years
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
1,273

 
1,157

 
13 years
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
62

 
44

 
2 years
Virginia Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause
 
53

 
47

 
2 years
Medicare Subsidy
 
46

 
51

 
10 years
Postemployment Benefits
 
39

 
40

 
4 years
Cook Plant Nuclear Refueling Outage Levelization
 
38

 
58

 
2 years
Storm Related Costs
 
26

 
18

 
4 years
Indiana Under-Recovered Capacity Costs
 
25

 

 
1 year
United Mine Workers of America Pension Withdrawal
 
25

 
27

 
11 years
Under-Recovery of PJM Expense
 
22

 

 
2 years
Under-Recovered gridSMART ®  Costs
 
16

 
8

 
2 years
Under-Recovery of Transmission Cost Recovery Factor
 
15

 
20

 
1 year
Under-Recovered Distribution Investment Rider
 
10

 
9

 
2 years
Unrealized Loss on Forward Commitments
 
10

 

 
3 years
Litigation Settlement
 
9

 
10

 
11 years
Deferred Restructuring Costs
 
8

 
11

 
4 years
Vegetation Management
 
5

 
14

 
1 year
Virginia Environmental Rate Adjustment Clause
 
3

 
27

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
44

 
49

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
4,038

 
4,046

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
$
4,264

 
$
4,376

 
 

98


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities are comprised of the following items:
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Refund Period
Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
(in millions)
 
 
Over-recovered Fuel Costs -  pays a return
 
$

 
$
9

 

Over-recovered Fuel Costs -  does not pay a return
 
55

 
110

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
$
55

 
$
119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities pending final regulatory determination:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
$

 
$
5

 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for Regulatory Loss
 
35

 

 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
17

 
3

 
 
Total Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
52

 
8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
2,660

 
2,589

 
(a)
Louisiana Refundable Construction Financing Costs
 
58

 
78

 
4 years
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Surcharge
 
44

 
68

 
6 years
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
26

 
29

 
46 years
Excess Earnings
 
11

 
12

 
39 years
Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
4

 
1

 
various
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excess Asset Retirement Obligations for Nuclear
 
 
 
 
 
 
Decommissioning Liability
 
695

 
597

 
(b)
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
112

 
121

 
50 years
Unrealized Gain on Forward Commitments
 
92

 
35

 
18 years
Over-Recovery of Transition Charges
 
47

 
40

 
13 years
Spent Nuclear Fuel Liability
 
44

 
43

 
(b)
Indiana Off-system Sales Margin Sharing
 
19

 

 
2 years
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
3

 
18

 
2 years
Deferred State Income Tax Coal Credits
 

 
28

 

Over-Recovery of PJM Expense
 

 
14

 

Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
25

 
13

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
3,840

 
3,686

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
3,892

 
$
3,694

 
 

(a)
Relieved as removal costs are incurred.
(b)
Relieved when plant is decommissioned.

99


6 .   COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES

We are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in our ordinary course of business.  In addition, our business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment.  The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against us cannot be predicted.  For current proceedings not specifically discussed below, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such proceedings would have a material effect on our financial statements.

COMMITMENTS

Construction and Commitments

The AEP System has substantial construction commitments to support its operations and environmental investments.  In managing the overall construction program and in the normal course of business, we contractually commit to third-party construction vendors for certain material purchases and other construction services.  The subsidiaries purchase fuel, materials, supplies, services and property, plant and equipment under contract as part of their normal course of business.  Certain supply contracts contain penalty provisions for early termination.

The following table summarizes our actual contractual commitments as of December 31, 2014 :
Contractual Commitments
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
Fuel Purchase Contracts (a)
 
$
2,240

 
$
2,735

 
$
1,825

 
$
2,104

 
$
8,904

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
363

 
405

 
426

 
2,087

 
3,281

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
191

 

 

 

 
191

Total
 
$
2,794

 
$
3,140

 
$
2,251

 
$
4,191

 
$
12,376


(a)
Represents contractual commitments to purchase coal, natural gas, uranium and other consumables as fuel for electric generation along with related transportation of the fuel.
(b)
Represents only capital assets for which we have signed contracts.  Actual payments are dependent upon and may vary significantly based upon the decision to build, regulatory approval schedules, timing and escalation of project costs.

GUARANTEES

We record liabilities for guarantees in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Guarantees.”  There is no collateral held in relation to any guarantees.  In the event any guarantee is drawn, there is no recourse to third parties unless specified below.

Letters of Credit

We enter into standby letters of credit with third parties.  As Parent, we issue all of these letters of credit in our ordinary course of business on behalf of our subsidiaries.  These letters of credit cover items such as natural gas and electricity risk management contracts, construction contracts, insurance programs, security deposits and debt service reserves.

We have two revolving credit facilities totaling $3.5 billion , under which we may issue up to $1.2 billion as letters of credit.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum future payments for letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities were $63 million with maturities ranging from February 2015 to March 2016.


100


In January 2014, we issued letters of credit under an $85 million uncommitted facility.  In October 2014, the uncommitted facility was renewed through October 2015 and increased to $100 million . As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum future payments for letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities were $81 million with a maturity of July 2015. An uncommitted facility gives the issuer of the facility the right to accept or decline each request we make under the facility.

We have $477 million of variable rate Pollution Control Bonds supported by bilateral letters of credit for $483 million .  The letters of credit have maturities ranging from March 2015 to July 2017.  In February 2015, $78 million of bilateral letters of credit maturing in March 2015 were extended to March 2017.
 
Guarantees of Third-Party Obligations

SWEPCo

As part of the process to receive a renewal of a Texas Railroad Commission permit for lignite mining, SWEPCo provides guarantees of mine reclamation of $115 million .  Since SWEPCo uses self-bonding, the guarantee provides for SWEPCo to commit to use its resources to complete the reclamation in the event the work is not completed by Sabine.  This guarantee ends upon depletion of reserves and completion of final reclamation.  Based on the latest study completed in 2010, we estimate the reserves will be depleted in 2036 with final reclamation completed by 2046 at an estimated cost of approximately $58 million .  Actual reclamation costs could vary due to period inflation and any changes to actual mine reclamation.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has collected approximately $64 million through a rider for final mine closure and reclamation costs, of which $16 million is recorded in Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities and $48 million is recorded in Asset Retirement Obligations on the balance sheet.

Sabine charges SWEPCo, its only customer, all of its costs.  SWEPCo passes these costs to customers through its fuel clause.

Indemnifications and Other Guarantees

Contracts

We enter into several types of contracts which require indemnifications.  Typically these contracts include, but are not limited to, sale agreements, lease agreements, purchase agreements and financing agreements.  Generally, these agreements may include, but are not limited to, indemnifications around certain tax, contractual and environmental matters.  With respect to sale agreements, our exposure generally does not exceed the sale price.  As of December 31, 2014 , there were no material liabilities recorded for any indemnifications.

Lease Obligations

We lease certain equipment under master lease agreements.  See “Master Lease Agreements” and “Railcar Lease” sections of Note 13 for disclosure of lease residual value guarantees.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTINGENCIES

The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) and State Remediation
 
By-products from the generation of electricity include materials such as ash, slag, sludge, low-level radioactive waste and SNF.  Coal combustion by-products, which constitute the overwhelming percentage of these materials, are typically treated and deposited in captive disposal facilities or are beneficially utilized.  In addition, our generation plants and transmission and distribution facilities have used asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and other hazardous and nonhazardous materials.  We currently incur costs to dispose of these substances safely.


101


Superfund addresses clean-up of hazardous substances that have been released to the environment.  The Federal EPA administers the clean-up programs.  Several states have enacted similar laws.  As of December 31, 2014 , our subsidiaries are named by the Federal EPA as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) for four sites for which alleged liability is unresolved.  There are nine additional sites for which our subsidiaries have received information requests which could lead to PRP designation.  Our subsidiaries have also been named potentially liable at three sites under state law including the I&M site discussed in the next paragraph.  In those instances where we have been named a PRP or defendant, our disposal or recycling activities were in accordance with the then-applicable laws and regulations.  Superfund does not recognize compliance as a defense, but imposes strict liability on parties who fall within its broad statutory categories.  Liability has been resolved for a number of sites with no significant effect on net income.

In 2008, I&M received a letter from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) concerning conditions at a site under state law and requesting I&M take voluntary action necessary to prevent and/or mitigate public harm.  I&M started remediation work in accordance with a plan approved by MDEQ.  In September 2014, I&M recorded an accrual for remediation at certain additional sites in Michigan. As of December 31, 2014 , I&M’s accrual for all of these sites is approximately $15 million .  As the remediation work is completed, I&M’s cost may change as new information becomes available concerning either the level of contamination at the site or changes in the scope of remediation.  We cannot predict the amount of additional cost, if any.

We evaluate the potential liability for each Superfund site separately, but several general statements can be made about our potential future liability.  Allegations that materials were disposed at a particular site are often unsubstantiated and the quantity of materials deposited at a site can be small and often nonhazardous.  Although Superfund liability has been interpreted by the courts as joint and several, typically many parties are named as PRPs for each site and several of the parties are financially sound enterprises.  At present, our estimates do not anticipate material cleanup costs for any of our identified Superfund sites, except the I&M sites discussed above.

NUCLEAR CONTINGENCIES

I&M owns and operates the two-unit 2,191 MW Cook Plant under licenses granted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).  We have a significant future financial commitment to dispose of SNF and to safely decommission and decontaminate the plant.  The licenses to operate the two nuclear units at the Cook Plant expire in 2034 and 2037.  The operation of a nuclear facility also involves special risks, potential liabilities and specific regulatory and safety requirements.  By agreement, I&M is partially liable, together with all other electric utility companies that own nuclear generating units, for a nuclear power plant incident at any nuclear plant in the U.S.  Should a nuclear incident occur at any nuclear power plant in the U.S., the liability could be substantial.

Decommissioning and Low Level Waste Accumulation Disposal

The cost to decommission a nuclear plant is affected by NRC regulations and the SNF disposal program.  Decommissioning costs are accrued over the service life of the Cook Plant.  The most recent decommissioning cost study was performed in 2012.  According to that study, the estimated cost of decommissioning and disposal of low-level radioactive waste ranges from $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion in 2012 nondiscounted dollars.  The wide range in estimated costs is caused by variables in assumptions.  I&M recovers estimated decommissioning costs for the Cook Plant in its rates.  The amounts recovered in rates were $9 million , $10 million and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  Decommissioning costs recovered from customers are deposited in external trusts.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the total decommissioning trust fund balance was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion , respectively.  Trust fund earnings increase the fund assets and decrease the amount remaining to be recovered from ratepayers.  The decommissioning costs (including interest, unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the trust funds) increase or decrease the recorded liability.


102


I&M continues to work with regulators and customers to recover the remaining estimated costs of decommissioning the Cook Plant.  However, future net income and cash flows would be reduced and financial condition could be impacted if the cost of SNF disposal and decommissioning continues to increase and cannot be recovered.

SNF Disposal

The federal government is responsible for permanent SNF disposal and assesses fees to nuclear plant owners for SNF disposal.  A fee of one mill per KWh for fuel consumed after April 6, 1983 at the Cook Plant was being collected from customers and remitted to the U.S. Treasury. This fee was terminated in May 2014.  As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , fees and related interest of $266 million and $265 million , respectively, for fuel consumed prior to April 7, 1983 have been recorded as Long-term Debt and funds collected from customers along with related earnings totaling $309 million and $309 million , respectively, to pay the fee are recorded as part of Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts.  I&M has not paid the government the pre-April 1983 fees due to continued delays and uncertainties related to the federal disposal program.

In 2011, I&M signed a settlement agreement with the federal government which permits I&M to make annual filings to recover certain SNF storage costs incurred as a result of the government’s delays in accepting SNF for permanent storage.  Under the settlement agreement, I&M received $22 million , $31 million and $20 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively, to recover costs and will be eligible to receive additional payment of annual claims for allowed costs that are incurred through December 31, 2016.  The proceeds reduced costs for dry cask storage.  As of December 31, 2014 , I&M has deferred $13 million in Prepayments and Other Current Assets and $2 million in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheet of dry cask storage and related operation and maintenance costs for recovery under this agreement.

See “Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal” section of Note 11 for disclosure of the fair value of assets within the trusts.

Nuclear Incident Liability

I&M carries insurance coverage for a nuclear incident at the Cook Plant for property damage, decommissioning and decontamination in the amount of $2.8 billion .  Insurance coverage for a nonnuclear incident at the Cook Plant is $1.7 billion .  Additional insurance provides coverage for a weekly indemnity payment resulting from an insured accidental outage.  I&M utilizes industry mutual insurers for the placement of this insurance coverage.  Participation in this mutual insurance requires a contingent financial obligation of up to $44 million for I&M which is assessable if the insurer’s financial resources would be inadequate to pay for losses.
 
The Price-Anderson Act, extended through December 31, 2025, establishes insurance protection for public liability arising from a nuclear incident at $13.6 billion and covers any incident at a licensed reactor in the U.S.  Commercially available insurance, which must be carried for each licensed reactor, provides $375 million of coverage.  In the event of a nuclear incident at any nuclear plant in the U.S., the remainder of the liability would be provided by a deferred premium assessment of $121 million on each licensed reactor in the U.S. payable in annual installments of $19 million .  As a result, I&M could be assessed $242 million per nuclear incident payable in annual installments of $38 million .  The number of incidents for which payments could be required is not limited.

In the event of an incident of a catastrophic nature, I&M is initially covered for the first $375 million through commercially available insurance.  The next level of liability coverage of up to $13.2 billion would be covered by claims made under the Price-Anderson Act.  If the liability were in excess of amounts recoverable from insurance and retrospective claim payments made under the Price-Anderson Act, I&M would seek to recover those amounts from customers through rate increases.  In the event nuclear losses or liabilities are underinsured or exceed accumulated funds and recovery from customers is not possible, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


103


OPERATIONAL CONTINGENCIES

Insurance and Potential Losses

We maintain insurance coverage normal and customary for an integrated electric utility, subject to various deductibles.  We also maintain property and casualty insurance that may cover certain physical damage or third-party injuries caused by cyber security incidents. Our insurance includes coverage for all risks of physical loss or damage to our nonnuclear assets, subject to insurance policy conditions and exclusions.  Covered property generally includes power plants, substations, facilities and inventories.  Excluded property generally includes transmission and distribution lines, poles and towers.  Our insurance programs also generally provide coverage against loss arising from certain claims made by third parties and are in excess of retentions absorbed by us.  Coverage is generally provided by a combination of our protected cell of EIS and/or various industry mutual and/or commercial insurance carriers.

See “Nuclear Contingencies” section of this footnote for a discussion of nuclear exposures and related insurance.

Some potential losses or liabilities may not be insurable or the amount of insurance carried may not be sufficient to meet potential losses and liabilities, including, but not limited to, liabilities relating to a cyber security incident or damage to the Cook Plant and costs of replacement power in the event of an incident at the Cook Plant.  Future losses or liabilities, if they occur, which are not completely insured, unless recovered from customers, could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Rockport Plant Litigation

In July 2013, the Wilmington Trust Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against AEGCo and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened by the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiff further alleges that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiff.  The New York court has granted our motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M. In January 2015, the court issued an opinion and order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. The court dismissed certain of the plaintiffs’ claims. Several claims remain, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  We will continue to defend against the remaining claims.  We are unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

Natural Gas Markets Lawsuits

In 2002, the Lieutenant Governor of California filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County California Superior Court against numerous energy companies, including AEP, alleging violations of California law through alleged fraudulent reporting of false natural gas price and volume information with an intent to affect the market price of natural gas and electricity.  AEP was dismissed from the case.  A number of similar cases were also filed in California and in state and federal courts in several states making essentially the same allegations under federal or state laws against the same companies.  AEP (or a subsidiary) is among the companies named as defendants in some of these cases.  We settled, received summary judgment or were dismissed from all of these cases.  The plaintiffs appealed the Nevada federal district court's dismissal of several cases involving AEP companies to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  In April 2013, the appellate court reversed in part, and affirmed in part, the district court's orders in these cases.  The appellate court reversed the district court's holding that the state antitrust claims were preempted by the Natural Gas Act and the order dismissing AEP from two of the cases on personal jurisdiction grounds and affirmed the decision denying leave to the plaintiffs to amend their complaints in two of the cases.  Defendants in these cases, including AEP, previously filed a petition seeking further review with the U.S. Supreme Court on the preemption issue. In June 2014, AEP filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the personal jurisdiction issue. In July 2014,

104


the U.S. Supreme Court granted the defendants' previously filed petition for further review with the U.S. Supreme Court on the preemption issue. Oral argument occurred in January 2015.  We will continue to defend the cases.  We believe the provision we have is adequate. We are unable to determine the amount of potential additional losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

Wage and Hours Lawsuit

In August 2013, PSO received an amended complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma by 36 current and former line and warehouse employees alleging that they have been denied overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.  Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to overtime pay for “on call” time. They allege that restrictions placed on them during on call hours are burdensome enough that they are entitled to compensation for these hours as hours worked.  Plaintiffs also filed a motion to conditionally certify this action as a class action, claiming there are an additional 70 individuals similarly situated to plaintiffs.  Plaintiffs seek damages in the amount of unpaid overtime over a three-year period and liquidated damages in the same amount.

In March 2014, the federal court granted plaintiffs’ motion to conditionally certify the action as a class action.  Notice was given to all potential class members and an additional 44 individuals opted in to the class, bringing the plaintiff class to 80 current and former employees. We will continue to defend the case. We are unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

National Do Not Call Registry Lawsuit

In May 2014, AEP Energy was served with a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The plaintiff alleges that he received telemarketing calls on behalf of AEP Energy despite having registered his telephone number on the National Do Not Call Registry. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of persons who allegedly received such calls. Plaintiff seeks statutory damages under the TCPA on behalf of himself and the alleged class as well as injunctive relief. As a result of a mediation held in October 2014, the parties reached an agreement in principle, subject to final documentation and preliminary and final court approval. We will continue to defend the case. We believe the provision we have is adequate. We are unable to determine the amount of potential additional losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

Gavin Landfill Litigation

In August 2014, a complaint was filed in the Mason County, West Virginia Circuit Court against AEP, AEPSC, OPCo and an individual supervisor alleging wrongful death and personal injury/illness claims arising out of purported exposure to coal combustion by-product waste at the Gavin Plant landfill.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 77 plaintiffs, consisting of 39 current and former contractors of the landfill and 38 family members of those contractors.  Eleven of the family members are pursuing personal injury/illness claims and the remainder are pursuing loss of consortium claims.  The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as medical monitoring.  In September 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending the case should be filed in Ohio.  That motion is pending.  We will continue to defend against the claims.  We are unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

105


7 .   ACQUISITION AND IMPAIRMENTS

ACQUISITION

2012

BlueStar Energy (Generation & Marketing segment)

In March 2012, we completed the acquisition of BlueStar Energy Holdings, Inc. (BlueStar) and its independent retail electric supplier BlueStar Energy Solutions for $70 million .  This transaction also included goodwill of $15 million , intangible assets associated with sales contracts and customer accounts of $58 million and liabilities associated with supply contracts of $25 million .  BlueStar has been in operation since 2002.  Beginning in June 2012, BlueStar began doing business as AEP Energy.  AEP Energy provides electric supply for retail customers in Ohio, Illinois and other deregulated electricity markets and also provides energy solutions throughout the United States, including demand response and energy efficiency services.

IMPAIRMENTS

2013

Amos Plant, Unit 3 (Vertically Integrated Utilities segment)

In July 2013, the Virginia SCC approved the transfer of a two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo but, for rate purposes, reduced the proposed transfer price by $83 million pretax.  The Virginia jurisdictional share of the reduced price is approximately $39 million .  In December 2013, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the transfer of a two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo but deferred a final decision related to the $83 million pretax reduction in transfer price until APCo’s next base rate case.  The West Virginia and FERC jurisdictional share of the potential reduced transfer price is approximately $44 million .  Upon evaluation, management believes the West Virginia jurisdictional share is probable of recovery.  As a result of the Virginia order, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we recorded a pretax impairment of $39 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income.  
 
Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 FGD Project (Vertically Integrated Utilities segment)

In the third quarter of 2013, KPCo recorded a pretax write-off of $33 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income primarily related to the Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 FGD project as disallowed by the KPSC.  

Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (Generation & Marketing segment)

In May 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio approved a modification to the consent decree, which was initially entered into in 2007, requiring certain types of pollution control equipment to be installed at certain AEP plants, including the 600 MW Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (MR5) coal-fired generation plant.  Under the modification to the consent decree, we have the option to cease burning coal and retire MR5 in 2015 or to cease burning coal in 2015 and complete a natural gas refueling project no later than June 2017.  In the second quarter of 2013, based on the approval of the modified consent decree and changes in other market factors, we re-evaluated potential courses of action with respect to the planned operation of MR5 and concluded that completion of a refueling project, which would have extended the useful life of MR5, is remote.  As a result, management completed an impairment analysis and concluded that MR5 was impaired.  Under a market-based value approach, using level 3 unobservable inputs, management determined that the fair value of this generating unit was zero based on the lack of installed environmental control equipment and the nature and condition of this generating unit.  In the second quarter of 2013, we recorded a pretax impairment of $154 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income which includes a $6 million pretax impairment of related material and supplies inventory.  Management expects to retire the plant in 2015.

106



2012

Beckjord Plant, Unit 6, Conesville Plant, Unit 3, Kammer Plant, Units 1-3, Muskingum River Plant, Units 1-4, Sporn Plant, Units 2 and 4 and Picway Plant, Unit 5 (Generation & Marketing segment)

In October 2012, we filed applications with the FERC proposing to terminate the Interconnection Agreement and seeking to complete the corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets.  Based on the intention to terminate the Interconnection Agreement and the FERC filing, we performed an evaluation of the recoverability of generation assets.  As a result, in November 2012, we, using generating unit specific estimated future cash flows, concluded that we had a material impairment of certain Ohio generation assets.  Under a market-based value approach, using level 3 unobservable inputs, we determined that the fair value of these generating units was zero based on the lack of installed environmental control equipment and the nature and condition of these generating units.  In the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded a pretax impairment of $287 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income related to Beckjord Plant, Unit 6, Conesville Plant, Unit 3, Kammer Plant, Units 1-3, Muskingum River Plant, Units 1-4, Sporn Plant, Units 2 and 4 and Picway Plant, Unit 5 generating units which includes $13 million of related material and supplies inventory.

Turk Plant (Vertically Integrated Utilities segment)

In 2012, SWEPCo recorded a pretax write-off of $13 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income related to unrecoverable construction costs subject to the Texas capital costs cap portion of the Turk Plant.

107


8 .   BENEFIT PLANS

For a discussion of investment strategy, investment limitations, target asset allocations and the classification of investments within the fair value hierarchy, see “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” and “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” sections of Note 1 .

We sponsor a qualified pension plan and two unfunded nonqualified pension plans.  Substantially all of our employees are covered by the qualified plan or both the qualified and a nonqualified pension plan.  We sponsor OPEB plans to provide health and life insurance benefits for retired employees.

We recognize the funded status associated with our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans in the balance sheets. Disclosures about the plans are required by the “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” accounting guidance.  We recognize an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, and recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income, the changes in the funded status of the plan that arise during the year that are not recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost.  We record a regulatory asset instead of other comprehensive income for qualifying benefit costs of our regulated operations that for ratemaking purposes are deferred for future recovery.  The cumulative funded status adjustment is equal to the remaining unrecognized deferrals for unamortized actuarial losses or gains, prior service costs and transition obligations, such that remaining deferred costs result in an AOCI equity reduction or regulatory asset and deferred gains result in an AOCI equity addition or regulatory liability.

Actuarial Assumptions for Benefit Obligations

The weighted-average assumptions as of December 31 of each year used in the measurement of our benefit obligations are shown in the following table:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Assumptions
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
Discount Rate
 
4.00
%
 
4.70
%
 
 
4.00
%
 
4.70
%
Rate of Compensation Increase
 
4.80
%
(a)
4.85
%
(a)
 
NA

 
NA


(a)
Rates are for base pay only.  In addition, an amount is added to reflect target incentive compensation for exempt employees and overtime and incentive pay for nonexempt employees.
NA
Not applicable.

We use a duration-based method to determine the discount rate for our plans.  A hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds is constructed with cash flows matching the benefit plan liability.  The composite yield on the hypothetical bond portfolio is used as the discount rate for the plan.

For 2014 , the rate of compensation increase assumed varies with the age of the employee, ranging from 3.5% per year to 12% per year, with an average increase of 4.8% .

We updated our mortality assumption for the December 31, 2014 benefit obligation measurements based on mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014. These updates increased our benefit obligations by approximately $128 million for the pension plans and $8 million for the OPEB plans.


108


Actuarial Assumptions for Net Periodic Benefit Costs

The weighted-average assumptions as of January 1 of each year used in the measurement of our benefit costs are shown in the following table:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Discount Rate
 
4.70
%
 
3.95
%
 
4.55
%
 
4.70
%
 
3.95
%
 
4.75
%
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
6.00
%
 
6.50
%
 
7.25
%
 
6.75
%
 
7.00
%
 
7.25
%
Rate of Compensation Increase
 
4.85
%
 
4.95
%
 
4.85
%
 
NA

 
NA

 
NA


NA
Not applicable.

The expected return on plan assets was determined by evaluating historical returns, the current investment climate (yield on fixed income securities and other recent investment market indicators), rate of inflation and current prospects for economic growth.

The health care trend rate assumptions as of January 1 of each year used for OPEB plans measurement purposes are shown below:
Health Care Trend Rates
 
2014
 
2013
Initial
 
6.50
%
 
6.75
%
Ultimate
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
Year Ultimate Reached
 
2020

 
2020


Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the OPEB health care plans.  A 1% change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
 
1% Increase
 
1% Decrease
 
 
(in millions)
Effect on Total Service and Interest Cost Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Health Care Benefit Cost
 
$
4

 
$
(3
)
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on the Health Care Component of the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation
 
77

 
(60
)

Significant Concentrations of Risk within Plan Assets

In addition to establishing the target asset allocation of plan assets, the investment policy also places restrictions on securities to limit significant concentrations within plan assets.  The investment policy establishes guidelines that govern maximum market exposure, security restrictions, prohibited asset classes, prohibited types of transactions, minimum credit quality, average portfolio credit quality, portfolio duration and concentration limits.  The guidelines were established to mitigate the risk of loss due to significant concentrations in any investment.  We monitor the plans to control security diversification and ensure compliance with our investment policy.  As of December 31, 2014 , the assets were invested in compliance with all investment limits.  See “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” section of Note 1 for limit details.


109


Benefit Plan Obligations, Plan Assets and Funded Status as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets and funded status as of December 31.  The benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans are the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation, respectively.
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
 Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in millions)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
4,841

 
$
5,205

 
$
1,456

 
$
1,849

Service Cost
 
72

 
69

 
14

 
23

Interest Cost
 
221

 
203

 
67

 
71

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
387

 
(305
)
 
(14
)
 
(395
)
Benefit Payments
 
(296
)
 
(331
)
 
(134
)
 
(140
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
42

 
39

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
8

 
9

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
5,225

 
$
4,841

 
$
1,439

 
$
1,456

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
4,711

 
$
4,696

 
$
1,699

 
$
1,568

Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
474

 
340

 
83

 
208

Company Contributions
 
79

 
6

 
4

 
24

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
42

 
39

Benefit Payments
 
(296
)
 
(331
)
 
(134
)
 
(140
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
4,968

 
$
4,711

 
$
1,694

 
$
1,699

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(257
)
 
$
(130
)
 
$
255

 
$
243


Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets  Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$

 
$
337

 
$
264

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term Benefit Liability
 
(6
)
 
(7
)
 
(4
)
 
(4
)
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations  Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(251
)
 
(123
)
 
(78
)
 
(17
)
Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(257
)
 
$
(130
)
 
$
255

 
$
243



110


Amounts Included in AOCI and Regulatory Assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in millions)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
1,612

 
$
1,561

 
$
420

 
$
428

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
5

 
8

 
(624
)
 
(693
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
1,418

 
$
1,343

 
$
(149
)
 
$
(191
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 
70

 
79

 
(19
)
 
(26
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 
129

 
147

 
(36
)
 
(48
)

Components of the change in amounts included in AOCI and Regulatory Assets during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in millions)
Actuarial (Gain) Loss During the Year
 
$
175

 
$
(367
)
 
$
14

 
$
(496
)
Amortization of Actuarial Loss
 
(124
)
 
(183
)
 
(22
)
 
(65
)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit (Cost)
 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
69

 
69

Change for the Year
 
$
48

 
$
(553
)
 
$
61

 
$
(492
)


111


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Plans’ Assets

The following table presents the classification of pension plan assets within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2014 :
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
589

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
589

 
11.9
 %
International
 
502

 

 

 

 
502

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
14

 

 

 
14

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
54

 

 

 

 
54

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
377

 

 

 
377

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
19

 

 

 
19

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
1,145

 
410

 

 

 
1,555

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
30

 

 

 
30

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
450

 

 

 
450

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
1,799

 

 

 
1,799

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
401

 

 

 
401

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
15

 

 

 
15

 
0.3
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
29

 

 

 
29

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
2,724

 

 

 
2,724

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
13

 

 
13

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
236

 

 
236

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
379

 

 
379

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
220

 

 

 
220

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(222
)
 
(222
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
53

 

 

 
53

 
1.1
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
10

 
10

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
1,145

 
$
3,407

 
$
628

 
$
(212
)
 
$
4,968

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the pension assets:
 
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
238

 
$
330

 
$
568

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
6

 
32

 
38

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
19

 
16

 
35

Purchases and Sales
 
13

 
(27
)
 
1

 
(13
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
13

 
$
236

 
$
379

 
$
628



112


The following table presents the classification of OPEB plan assets within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2014 :
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
466

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
466

 
27.5
%
International
 
567

 

 

 

 
567

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
16

 

 

 
16

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
30

 

 

 
30

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
1,033

 
46

 

 

 
1,079

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
104

 

 

 
104

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
71

 

 

 
71

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
125

 

 

 
125

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
21

 

 

 
21

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
6

 

 

 
6

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
5

 

 

 
5

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
332

 

 

 
332

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
10

 

 

 
10

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
212

 

 

 
212

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
222

 

 

 
222

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
47

 
10

 

 

 
57

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
4

 
4

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
1,080

 
$
610

 
$

 
$
4

 
$
1,694

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


113


The following table presents the classification of pension plan assets within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013 :
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
1,092

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,092

 
23.2
 %
International
 
514

 

 

 

 
514

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
58

 

 

 

 
58

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
10

 

 

 
10

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
1,664

 
10

 

 

 
1,674

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
26

 

 

 
26

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
387

 

 

 
387

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
1,600

 

 

 
1,600

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
344

 

 

 
344

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
28

 

 

 
28

 
0.6
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
33

 

 

 
33

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
2,418

 

 

 
2,418

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
238

 

 
238

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
330

 

 
330

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
35

 

 

 
35

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(45
)
 
(45
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
48

 

 

 
48

 
1.0
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
13

 
13

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
1,664

 
$
2,511

 
$
568

 
$
(32
)
 
$
4,711

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the pension assets:
 
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
220

 
$
195

 
$
415

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
26

 
15

 
41

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
15

 
15

Purchases and Sales
 
(8
)
 
105

 
97

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
238

 
$
330

 
$
568



114


The following table presents the classification of OPEB plan assets within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013 :
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
473

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
473

 
27.9
%
International
 
616

 

 

 

 
616

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
15

 

 

 
15

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
1,089

 
15

 

 

 
1,104

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
88

 

 

 
88

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
56

 

 

 
56

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
110

 

 

 
110

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
22

 

 

 
22

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
5

 

 

 
5

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
8

 

 

 
8

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
289

 

 

 
289

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
13

 

 

 
13

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
211

 

 

 
211

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
224

 

 

 
224

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
68

 
9

 

 

 
77

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
5

 
5

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
1,157

 
$
537

 
$

 
$
5

 
$
1,699

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

Determination of Pension Expense

We base our determination of pension expense or income on a market-related valuation of assets which reduces year-to-year volatility.  This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur.  Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Qualified Pension Plan
 
$
4,982

 
$
4,638

Nonqualified Pension Plans
 
76

 
77

Total
 
$
5,058

 
$
4,715



115


For our underfunded pension plans that had an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets of these plans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 
 
Underfunded Pension Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Projected Benefit Obligation
 
$
5,225

 
$
4,841

 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
 
$
5,058

 
$
4,715

Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
4,968

 
4,711

Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation
 
$
(90
)
 
$
(4
)

Estimated Future Benefit Payments and Contributions

We expect contributions and payments for the pension plans of $93 million and the OPEB plans of $6 million during 2015 .  For the pension plans, this amount includes the payment of unfunded nonqualified benefits plus contributions to the qualified trust fund of at least the minimum amount required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.  For the qualified pension plan, we may also make additional discretionary contributions to maintain the funded status of the plan.  For the OPEB plans, expected payments include the payment of unfunded benefits.

The table below reflects the total benefits expected to be paid from the plan or from our assets.  The payments include the participants’ contributions to the plan for their share of the cost.  Effective for employees hired after December 2013, we will not provide retiree medical coverage.  Future benefit payments are dependent on the number of employees retiring, whether the retiring employees elect to receive pension benefits as annuities or as lump sum distributions, future integration of the benefit plans with changes to Medicare and other legislation, future levels of interest rates and variances in actuarial results.  The estimated payments for pension benefits and OPEB are as follows:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
 
 
Pension
Payments
 
Benefit
Payments
 
Medicare Subsidy
Receipts
 
 
(in millions)
2015
 
$
315

 
$
129

 
$

2016
 
323

 
129

 

2017
 
334

 
130

 

2018
 
341

 
132

 

2019
 
350

 
132

 

Years 2020 to 2024, in Total
 
1,822

 
688

 
2



116


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The following table provides the components of our net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Service Cost
 
$
72

 
$
69

 
$
76

 
$
14

 
$
23

 
$
47

Interest Cost
 
221

 
203

 
223

 
67

 
71

 
103

Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(262
)
 
(278
)
 
(319
)
 
(111
)
 
(107
)
 
(101
)
Amortization of Transition Obligation
 

 

 

 

 

 
1

Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
3

 
3

 
(1
)
 
(69
)
 
(69
)
 
(18
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
 
124

 
183

 
155

 
22

 
65

 
57

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
 
158

 
180

 
134

 
(77
)
 
(17
)
 
89

Capitalized Portion
 
(52
)
 
(56
)
 
(42
)
 
25

 
5

 
(28
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
 
$
106

 
$
124

 
$
92

 
$
(52
)
 
$
(12
)
 
$
61


Estimated amounts expected to be amortized to net periodic benefit costs (credits) and the impact on the balance sheet during 2015 are shown in the following table:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Components
 
(in millions)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
108

 
$
17

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
2

 
(69
)
Total Estimated 2015 Amortization
 
$
110

 
$
(52
)
 
 
 
 
 
Expected to be Recorded as
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Asset
 
$
94

 
$
(38
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 
6

 
(5
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 
10

 
(9
)
Total
 
$
110

 
$
(52
)

American Electric Power System Retirement Savings Plan

We sponsor the American Electric Power System Retirement Savings Plan, a defined contribution retirement savings plan for substantially all employees who are not covered by a retirement savings plan of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA).  It is a qualified plan offering participants an opportunity to contribute a portion of their pay with features under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The matching contributions to the plan are 100% of the first 1% of eligible employee contributions and 70% of the next 5% of contributions.  The cost for matching contributions totaled $70 million in 2014 , $67 million in 2013 and $66 million in 2012 .

UMWA Benefits

We provide UMWA pension, health and welfare benefits for certain unionized employees, retirees and their survivors who meet eligibility requirements.  UMWA trustees make final interpretive determinations with regard to all benefits.  The pension benefits are administered by UMWA trustees and contributions are made to their trust funds.  The health and welfare benefits are administered by us and benefits are paid from our general assets.


117


The UMWA pension benefits are administered through a multiemployer plan that is different from single-employer plans as an employer’s contributions may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.  Required contributions not made by any employer may result in other employers bearing the unfunded plan obligations, while a withdrawing employer may be subject to a withdrawal liability.  UMWA pension benefits are provided through the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (Employer Identification Number: 52-1050282, Plan Number 2), which under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was in Critical Status for the plan year ending June 30, 2014 and in Seriously Endangered Status for the plan year ending June 30, 2013, without utilization of extended amortization provisions.  The Plan adopted a funding improvement plan in May 2012, as required under the PPA.

Contributions to the UMWA pension plan in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were made under a collective bargaining agreement that is scheduled to expire December 31, 2017.  We contributed immaterial amounts in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 that represent less than 5% of the total contributions in the plan’s latest annual report for the years ended June 30, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .  The contributions we made included a surcharge of 5% beginning December 2014 and are scheduled to include a surcharge of 10% beginning July 2015.  There are no minimum contributions for future years.

Based upon the plan to retrofit the Rockport Plant with dry sorbent injection technology to meet environmental emission control requirements and the timing of the closure of Cook Coal Terminal expected to be in or after 2025, we recorded a UWMA withdrawal liability in 2013.  The withdrawal liability regulatory asset recorded on the balance sheet should be recovered in future billings for transloading services before the planned closure. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the regulatory asset balance was $25 million and $27 million , respectively.

118


9 .   BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Our primary business is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.  Within our Vertically Integrated Utilities segment, we centrally dispatch generation assets and manage our overall utility operations on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight.  Intersegment sales and transfers are generally based on underlying contractual arrangements and agreements.

Our reportable segments and their related business activities are outlined below:

Vertically Integrated Utilities

Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.

Transmission and Distribution Utilities

Transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCo, TCC and TNC.
OPCo purchases energy to serve SSO customers, and provides capacity for all connected load.

AEP Transmission Holdco

Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in our wholly-owned transmission only subsidiaries and transmission only joint ventures. These investments have PUCT-approved or FERC-approved returns on equity.

Generation & Marketing

Nonregulated generation in ERCOT and PJM.
Marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, PJM and MISO.

AEP River Operations

Commercial barging operations that transports liquids, coal and dry bulk commodities primarily on the Ohio, Illinois and lower Mississippi Rivers.

The remainder of our activities is presented as Corporate and Other.  While not considered a reportable segment, Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries.  This segment also includes Parent’s guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense and other nonallocated costs.


119


The tables below present our reportable segment income statement information for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012   and reportable segment balance sheet information as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  These amounts include certain estimates and allocations where necessary.
 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
Generation & Marketing
 
AEP River Operations
 
Corporate and Other(a)
 
Reconciling Adjustments
 
Consolidated
 
 
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External Customers
 
$
9,397

(b)
$
4,553

 
$
74

 
$
2,384

(b)
$
642

 
$
22

 
$
(52
)
(c)
$
17,020

Other Operating Segments
 
87

(b)
261

 
118

 
1,466

(b)
58

 
73

 
(2,063
)
 

Total Revenues
 
$
9,484

 
$
4,814

 
$
192

 
$
3,850

 
$
700

 
$
95

 
$
(2,115
)
 
$
17,020

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,033

 
658

 
24

 
227

 
31

 

 
(44
)
(d)
1,929

Interest and Investment Income
 
4

 
11

 

 
5

 

 
7

 
(20
)
 
7

Carrying Costs Income
 
6

 
27

 

 

 

 

 

 
33

Interest Expense
 
526

 
280

 
23

 
46

 
17

 
26

 
(33
)
(d)
885

Income Tax Expense
 
434

 
211

 
63

 
179

 
40

 
15

 

 
942

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
712

 
355

 
151

 
367

 
49

 
4

 

 
1,638

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Property Additions
 
2,055

 
1,038

 
948

 
165

 
4

 
17

 
(28
)
 
4,199


120


 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
Generation & Marketing
 
AEP River Operations
 
Corporate and Other(a)
 
Reconciling Adjustments
 
Consolidated
 
 
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External Customers
 
$
9,347

 
$
4,279

 
$
27

 
$
1,208

 
$
544

 
$
32

 
$
(80
)
(c)
$
15,357

Other Operating Segments
 
645

 
199

 
51

 
2,457

 
19

 
57

 
(3,428
)
 

Total Revenues
 
$
9,992

 
$
4,478

 
$
78

 
$
3,665

 
$
563

 
$
89

 
$
(3,508
)
 
$
15,357

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
$
72

 
$

 
$

 
$
154

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
226

Depreciation and Amortization
 
941

 
591

 
10

 
236

 
31

 

 
(66
)
(d)
1,743

Interest and Investment Income
 
7

 
2

 

 
2

 

 
69

 
(22
)
 
58

Carrying Costs Income
 
14

 
16

 

 

 

 

 

 
30

Interest Expense
 
540

 
292

 
10

 
55

 
17

 
27

 
(35
)
(d)
906

Income Tax Expense (Credit)
 
398

 
198

 
29

 
112

 
7

 
(60
)
 

 
684

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
681

 
358

 
80

 
228

 
12

 
125

 

 
1,484

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Property Additions
 
1,822

 
871

 
843

 
185

 
7

 
9

 
(81
)
 
3,656


121


 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
Generation & Marketing
 
AEP River Operations
 
Corporate and Other(a)
 
Reconciling Adjustments
 
Consolidated
 
 
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External Customers
 
$
8,785

 
$
4,659

 
$
7

 
$
882

 
$
647

 
$
25

 
$
(60
)
(c)
$
14,945

Other Operating Segments
 
633

 
159

 
17

 
2,585

 
20

 
58

 
(3,472
)
 

Total Revenues
 
$
9,418

 
$
4,818

 
$
24

 
$
3,467

 
$
667

 
$
83

 
$
(3,532
)
 
$
14,945

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
$
13

 
$

 
$

 
$
287

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
300

Depreciation and Amortization
 
873

 
561

 
3

 
349

 
29

 

 
(33
)
(d)
1,782

Interest and Investment Income
 
5

 
4

 

 
1

 

 
22

 
(24
)
 
8

Carrying Costs Income
 
28

 
24

 
1

 

 

 

 

 
53

Interest Expense
 
520

 
291

 
3

 
83

 
17

 
112

 
(38
)
(d)
988

Income Tax Expense
 
345

 
201

 
17

 
15

 
7

 
19

 

 
604

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
803

 
389

 
43

 
100

 
15

 
(88
)
 

 
1,262

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Property Additions
 
1,801

 
664

 
392

 
249

 
31

 
2

 
(20
)
 
3,119

 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
Generation & Marketing
 
AEP River Operations
 
Corporate and Other(a)
 
Reconciling Adjustments
 
Consolidated
 
 
(in millions)
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
39,402

 
$
13,024

 
$
2,714

 
$
8,394

 
$
700

 
$
343

 
$
(272
)
(d)
$
64,305

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
12,773

 
3,481

 
25

 
3,603

 
217

 
188

 
(99
)
(d)
20,188

Total Property, Plant and Equipment  Net
 
$
26,629

 
$
9,543

 
$
2,689

 
$
4,791

 
$
483

 
$
155

 
$
(173
)
(d)
$
44,117

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
 
$
33,750

 
$
14,495

 
$
3,575

 
$
6,329

 
$
749

 
$
21,081

 
$
(20,346
)
(d) (e)
$
59,633

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in Equity Method Investees
 
26

 
1

 
548

 

 
58

 
15

 

 
648

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliated
 
$
111

 
$

 
$

 
$
86

 
$

 
$

 
$
(197
)
 
$

Non-Affiliated
 
1,352

 
405

 

 
740

 
3

 
3

 

 
2,503

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliated
 
20

 

 

 
32

 

 

 
(52
)
 

Non-Affiliated
 
8,634

 
5,256

 
1,153

 
217

 
80

 
841

 

 
16,181

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Long-term Debt
 
$
10,117

 
$
5,661

 
$
1,153

 
$
1,075

 
$
83

 
$
844

 
$
(249
)
 
$
18,684


122


 
 
Vertically Integrated Utilities
 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
 
AEP Transmission Holdco
 
Generation & Marketing
 
AEP River Operations
 
Corporate and Other(a)
 
Reconciling Adjustments
 
Consolidated
 
 
(in millions)
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
37,545

 
$
12,143

 
$
1,636

 
$
8,277

 
$
638

 
$
315

 
$
(269
)
(d)
$
60,285

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
12,250

 
3,342

 
10

 
3,409

 
189

 
173

 
(85
)
(d)
19,288

Total Property, Plant and Equipment  Net
 
$
25,295

 
$
8,801

 
$
1,626

 
$
4,868

 
$
449

 
$
142

 
$
(184
)
(d)
$
40,997

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
 
$
32,791

 
$
14,165

 
$
2,245

 
$
6,426

 
$
673

 
$
19,645

 
$
(19,531
)
(d) (e)
$
56,414

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in Equity Method Investees
 
24

 

 
480

 

 
54

 
11

 

 
569

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliated
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
179

 
$
5

 
$

 
$
(184
)
 
$

Non-Affiliated
 
720

 
697

 

 
126

 
2

 
4

 

 
1,549

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliated
 
151

 

 

 
118

 
10

 

 
(279
)
 

Non-Affiliated
 
9,265

 
5,360

 
620

 
664

 
83

 
836

 

 
16,828

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Long-term Debt
 
$
10,136

 
$
6,057

 
$
620

 
$
1,087

 
$
100

 
$
840

 
$
(463
)
 
$
18,377


(a)
Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries. This segment also includes Parent's guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense and other nonallocated costs.
(b)
Includes the impact of the corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013, as well as the impact of the termination of the Interconnection Agreement effective January 1, 2014.
(c)
Reconciling Adjustments for External Customers primarily include eliminations as a result of corporate separation in Ohio.
(d)
Includes eliminations due to an intercompany capital lease.
(e)
Reconciling Adjustments for Total Assets primarily include the elimination of intercompany advances to affiliates and intercompany accounts receivable along with the elimination of AEP's investments in subsidiary companies.

123


10 .   DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

OBJECTIVES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to certain market risks as a major power producer and marketer of wholesale electricity, natural gas, coal and emission allowances.  These risks include commodity price risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency exchange risk.  These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact us due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.  We manage these risks using derivative instruments.

STRATEGIES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES

Risk Management Strategies

Our strategy surrounding the use of derivative instruments primarily focuses on managing our risk exposures, future cash flows and creating value utilizing both economic and formal hedging strategies.  Our risk management strategies also include the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes, focusing on seizing market opportunities to create value driven by expected changes in the market prices of the commodities in which we transact.  To accomplish our objectives, we primarily employ risk management contracts including physical and financial forward purchase-and-sale contracts and, to a lesser extent, OTC swaps and options.  Not all risk management contracts meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”  Derivative risk management contracts elected normal under the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception are not subject to the requirements of this accounting guidance.

We enter into power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other commodity contracts to manage the risk associated with our energy business.  We enter into interest rate derivative contracts in order to manage the interest rate exposure associated with our commodity portfolio.  For disclosure purposes, such risks are grouped as “Commodity,” as they are related to energy risk management activities.  We also engage in risk management of interest rate risk associated with debt financing and foreign currency risk associated with future purchase obligations denominated in foreign currencies.  For disclosure purposes, these risks are grouped as “Interest Rate and Foreign Currency.”  The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations and Finance groups in accordance with our established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors.

The following table represents the gross notional volume of our outstanding derivative contracts as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Notional Volume of Derivative Instruments
 
 
Volume
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Unit of
Primary Risk Exposure
 
2014
 
2013
 
Measure
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Power
 
334

 
406

 
MWhs
Coal
 
3

 
4

 
Tons
Natural Gas
 
106

 
127

 
MMBtus
Heating Oil and Gasoline
 
6

 
6

 
Gallons
Interest Rate
 
$
152

 
$
191

 
USD
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
$
815

 
$
820

 
USD


124


Fair Value Hedging Strategies

We enter into interest rate derivative transactions as part of an overall strategy to manage the mix of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt.  Certain interest rate derivative transactions effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating rate.  Provided specific criteria are met, these interest rate derivatives are designated as fair value hedges.

Cash Flow Hedging Strategies

We enter into and designate as cash flow hedges certain derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of power and natural gas (“Commodity”) in order to manage the variable price risk related to the forecasted purchase and sale of these commodities. We monitor the potential impacts of commodity price changes and, where appropriate, enter into derivative transactions to protect profit margins for a portion of future electricity sales and energy purchases. We do not hedge all commodity price risk.

Our vehicle fleet and barge operations are exposed to gasoline and diesel fuel price volatility. We enter into financial heating oil and gasoline derivative contracts in order to mitigate price risk of our future fuel purchases. We discontinued cash flow hedge accounting for these derivative contracts effective March 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we designated financial heating oil and gasoline derivatives as cash flow hedges. For disclosure purposes, these contracts were included with other hedging activities as “Commodity” as of December 31, 2013. In March 2014, these contracts were grouped as "Commodity" with other risk management activities. We do not hedge all fuel price risk.

We enter into a variety of interest rate derivative transactions in order to manage interest rate risk exposure. Some interest rate derivative transactions effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed rate. We also enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest rate exposure related to future borrowings of fixed-rate debt. Our forecasted fixed-rate debt offerings have a high probability of occurrence as the proceeds will be used to fund existing debt maturities and projected capital expenditures. We do not hedge all interest rate exposure.

At times, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks primarily when we purchase certain fixed assets from foreign suppliers. In accordance with our risk management policy, we may enter into foreign currency derivative transactions to protect against the risk of increased cash outflows resulting from a foreign currency’s appreciation against the dollar. We do not hedge all foreign currency exposure.

ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND THE IMPACT ON OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging” requires recognition of all qualifying derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets at fair value.  The fair values of derivative instruments accounted for using MTM accounting or hedge accounting are based on exchange prices and broker quotes.  If a quoted market price is not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available including valuation models that estimate future energy prices based on existing market and broker quotes, supply and demand market data and assumptions.  In order to determine the relevant fair values of our derivative instruments, we also apply valuation adjustments for discounting, liquidity and credit quality.

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to perform on the contract or fail to pay amounts due.  Liquidity risk represents the risk that imperfections in the market will cause the price to vary from estimated fair value based upon prevailing market supply and demand conditions.  Since energy markets are imperfect and volatile, there are inherent risks related to the underlying assumptions in models used to fair value risk management contracts.  Unforeseen events may cause reasonable price curves to differ from actual price curves throughout a contract’s term and at the time a contract settles.  Consequently, there could be significant adverse or favorable effects on future net income and cash flows if market prices are not consistent with our estimates of current market consensus for forward prices in the current period.  This is particularly true for longer term contracts.  Cash flows may vary based on market conditions, margin requirements and the timing of settlement of our risk management contracts.

125



According to the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging,” we reflect the fair values of our derivative instruments subject to netting agreements with the same counterparty net of related cash collateral.  For certain risk management contracts, we are required to post or receive cash collateral based on third party contractual agreements and risk profiles.  For the December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets, we netted $4 million and $4 million , respectively, of cash collateral received from third parties against short-term and long-term risk management assets and $35 million and $13 million , respectively, of cash collateral paid to third parties against short-term and long-term risk management liabilities.

The following tables represent the gross fair value impact of our derivative activity on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
392

 
$
30

 
$
3

 
$
425

 
$
(247
)
 
$
178

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
367

 
3

 

 
370

 
(76
)
 
294

Total Assets
 
759

 
33

 
3

 
795

 
(323
)
 
472

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
329

 
23

 
1

 
353

 
(261
)
 
92

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
208

 
8

 
9

 
225

 
(94
)
 
131

Total Liabilities
 
537

 
31

 
10

 
578

 
(355
)
 
223

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
222

 
$
2

 
$
(7
)
 
$
217

 
$
32

 
$
249


Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
347

 
$
12

 
$
4

 
$
363

 
$
(203
)
 
$
160

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
368

 
3

 

 
371

 
(74
)
 
297

Total Assets
 
715

 
15

 
4

 
734

 
(277
)
 
457

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
292

 
11

 
1

 
304

 
(214
)
 
90

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
237

 
3

 
15

 
255

 
(78
)
 
177

Total Liabilities
 
529

 
14

 
16

 
559

 
(292
)
 
267

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net
 Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
186

 
$
1

 
$
(12
)
 
$
175

 
$
15

 
$
190


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts primarily include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."  Amounts also include de-designated risk management contracts.
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.
 

126


The table below presents our activity of derivative risk management contracts for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Location of Gain (Loss)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues
 
$
35

 
$
15

 
$
10

Generation & Marketing Revenues
 
53

 
49

 
50

Regulatory Assets (a)
 
(11
)
 
(2
)
 
(43
)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)
 
193

 
(5
)
 
8

Total Gain on Risk Management Contracts
 
$
270

 
$
57

 
$
25


(a)
Represents realized and unrealized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.
   
Certain qualifying derivative instruments have been designated as normal purchase or normal sale contracts, as provided in the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”  Derivative contracts that have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales under that accounting guidance are not subject to MTM accounting treatment and are recognized on the statements of income on an accrual basis.

Our accounting for the changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it qualifies for and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship.  Depending on the exposure, we designate a hedging instrument as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge.

For contracts that have not been designated as part of a hedging relationship, the accounting for changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative instrument is held for trading purposes.  Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments held for trading purposes are included in revenues on a net basis on the statements of income.  Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments not held for trading purposes are included in revenues or expenses on the statements of income depending on the relevant facts and circumstances.  However, unrealized and some realized gains and losses in regulated jurisdictions for both trading and non-trading derivative instruments are recorded as regulatory assets (for losses) or regulatory liabilities (for gains) in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations.”

Accounting for Fair Value Hedging Strategies

For fair value hedges (i.e. hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or an identified portion thereof attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item associated with the hedged risk impacts Net Income during the period of change.

We record realized and unrealized gains or losses on interest rate swaps that qualify for fair value hedge accounting treatment and any offsetting changes in the fair value of the debt being hedged in Interest Expense on the statements of income.  The following table shows the results of our hedging gains (losses) during 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 :
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Gain (Loss) on Fair Value Hedging Instruments
$
4

 
$
(10
)
 
$

(a)
Gain (Loss) on Fair Value Portion of Long-term Debt
(4
)
 
10

 

(a)

(a)
The fair value changes were immaterial.

For 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial.


127


Accounting for Cash Flow Hedging Strategies

For cash flow hedges (i.e. hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a particular risk), we initially report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets until the period the hedged item affects Net Income.  We recognize any hedge ineffectiveness in Net Income immediately during the period of change, except in regulated jurisdictions where hedge ineffectiveness is recorded as a regulatory asset (for losses) or a regulatory liability (for gains).
 
Realized gains and losses on derivative contracts for the purchase and sale of power and natural gas designated as cash flow hedges are included in Revenues or Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income, or in Regulatory Assets or Regulatory Liabilities on the balance sheets, depending on the specific nature of the risk being hedged.  During 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we designated power and natural gas derivatives as cash flow hedges.

We reclassify gains and losses on heating oil and gasoline derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Other Operation expense, Maintenance expense or Depreciation and Amortization expense, as it relates to capital projects, on the statements of income.  During 2013 and 2012 , we designated heating oil and gasoline derivatives as cash flow hedges. The impact of cash flow hedge accounting for these derivative contracts was immaterial and was discontinued effective March 31, 2014.

We reclassify gains and losses on interest rate derivative hedges related to our debt financings from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Interest Expense on the statements of income in those periods in which hedged interest payments occur.  During 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we designated interest rate derivatives as cash flow hedges.

The accumulated gains or losses related to our foreign currency hedges are reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Depreciation and Amortization expense on the statements of income over the depreciable lives of the fixed assets designated as the hedged items in qualifying foreign currency hedging relationships.  During 2014 and 2013 , we did not designate any foreign currency derivatives as cash flow hedges.  During 2012 , we designated foreign currency derivatives as cash flow hedges.

During 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial or nonexistent for all cash flow hedge strategies disclosed above.

For details on designated, effective cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets and the reasons for changes in cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , see Note 3 .


128


Cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were:
Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on the Balance Sheet
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Hedging Assets (a)
$
16

 
$

 
$
16

Hedging Liabilities (a)
14

 
1

 
15

AOCI Gain (Loss) Net of Tax
1

 
(19
)
 
(18
)
Portion Expected to be Reclassified to Net Income During the Next Twelve Months
4

 
(2
)
 
2

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on the Balance Sheet
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Hedging Assets (a)
$
7

 
$

 
$
7

Hedging Liabilities (a)
6

 
2

 
8

AOCI Loss Net of Tax

 
(23
)
 
(23
)
Portion Expected to be Reclassified to Net Income During the Next Twelve Months

 
(4
)
 
(4
)

(a)
Hedging Assets and Hedging Liabilities are included in Risk Management Assets and Liabilities on the balance sheets.
  
The actual amounts that we reclassify from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Net Income can differ from the estimate above due to market price changes.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum length of time that we are hedging (with contracts subject to the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging”) our exposure to variability in future cash flows related to forecasted transactions was 72 months .

Credit Risk

We limit credit risk in our wholesale marketing and trading activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis.  We use Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and current market-based qualitative and quantitative data as well as financial statements to assess the financial health of counterparties on an ongoing basis.

When we use standardized master agreements, these agreements may include collateral requirements.  These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty.  Cash, letters of credit and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk.  The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds our established threshold.  The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with our credit policy.  In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.


129


Collateral Triggering Events

Under the tariffs of the RTOs and Independent System Operators (ISOs), a limited number of derivative and non-derivative contracts primarily related to our competitive retail auction loads, and guaranties for contractual obligations, we are obligated to post an additional amount of collateral if our credit ratings decline below a specified rating threshold. The amount of collateral required fluctuates based on market prices and our total exposure. On an ongoing basis, our risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these collateral triggering items in contracts. AEP and its subsidiaries have not experienced a downgrade below a specified rating threshold that would require the posting of additional collateral. The following table represents our exposure if our credit ratings were to decline below a specified rating threshold as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Fair Value of Contracts with Credit Downgrade Triggers
 
$

 
$
3

Amount of Collateral AEP Subsidiaries Would Have been Required to Post for Derivative Contracts as well as Derivative and Non-Derivative Contracts Subject to the Same Master Netting Arrangement
 

 

Amount of Collateral AEP Subsidiaries Would Have Been Required to Post Attributable to RTOs and ISOs
 
36

 
28

Amount of Collateral Attributable to Other Contracts (a)
 
281

 
5


(a)
Represents the amount of collateral AEP subsidiaries would have been required to post for other significant non-derivative contracts including AGR jointly owned plant contracts and various other commodity related contacts.

In addition, a majority of our non-exchange traded commodity contracts contain cross-default provisions that, if triggered, would permit the counterparty to declare a default and require settlement of the outstanding payable.  These cross-default provisions could be triggered if there was a non-performance event by Parent or the obligor under outstanding debt or a third party obligation in excess of $50 million .  On an ongoing basis, our risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these cross-default provisions in our contracts.  The following table represents: (a) the fair value of these derivative liabilities subject to cross-default provisions prior to consideration of contractual netting arrangements, (b) the amount this exposure has been reduced by cash collateral we have posted and (c) if a cross-default provision would have been triggered, the settlement amount that would be required after considering our contractual netting arrangements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in millions)
Liabilities for Contracts with Cross Default Provisions Prior to Contractual Netting Arrangements
$
235

 
$
293

Amount of Cash Collateral Posted
9

 
1

Additional Settlement Liability if Cross Default Provision is Triggered
178

 
235


130


11 .   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value Measurements of Long-term Debt

The fair values of Long-term Debt are based on quoted market prices, without credit enhancements, for the same or similar issues and the current interest rates offered for instruments with similar maturities classified as Level 2 measurement inputs.  These instruments are not marked-to-market.  The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange.

The book values and fair values of Long-term Debt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized in the following table:
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
(in millions)
Long-term Debt
$
18,684

 
$
21,075

 
$
18,377

 
$
19,672


Fair Value Measurements of Other Temporary Investments

Other Temporary Investments include funds held by trustees primarily for the payment of securitization bonds and securities available for sale, including marketable securities that we intend to hold for less than one year and investments by our protected cell of EIS.  See “Other Temporary Investments” section of Note 1.

The following is a summary of Other Temporary Investments:
 
 
December 31, 2014
Other Temporary Investments
 
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair
Value
 
 
(in millions)
Restricted Cash (a)
 
$
280

 
$

 
$

 
$
280

Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds
 
81

 

 

 
81

Equity Securities  Mutual Funds
 
13

 
12

 

 
25

Total Other Temporary Investments
 
$
374

 
$
12

 
$

 
$
386

 
 
December 31, 2013
Other Temporary Investments
 
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized Losses
 
Estimated Fair
Value
 
 
(in millions)
Restricted Cash (a)
 
$
250

 
$

 
$

 
$
250

Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds
 
80

 

 

 
80

Equity Securities  Mutual Funds
 
12

 
11

 

 
23

Total Other Temporary Investments
 
$
342

 
$
11

 
$

 
$
353


(a)
Primarily represents amounts held for the repayment of debt.


131


The following table provides the activity for our fixed income and equity securities within Other Temporary Investments for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales
 
$

 
$

 
$

Purchases of Investments
 
2

 
17

 
2

Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales
 

 

 

Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales
 

 

 


As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , we had no Other Temporary Investments with an unrealized loss position.  As of December 31, 2014 , fixed income securities were primarily debt based mutual funds with short and intermediate maturities.  Mutual funds may be sold and do not contain maturity dates.

For details of the reasons for changes in securities available for sale included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , see Note 3 .

Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal

I&M records securities held in trust funds for decommissioning nuclear facilities and for the disposal of SNF at fair value.  See “Nuclear Trust Funds” section of Note 1.

The following is a summary of nuclear trust fund investments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
Estimated Fair
Value
 
Gross Unrealized
Gains
 
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
 
Estimated Fair
Value
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
 
(in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
20

 
$

 
$

 
$
19

 
$

 
$

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government
697

 
45

 
(5
)
 
609

 
26

 
(4
)
Corporate Debt
48

 
4

 
(1
)
 
37

 
2

 
(1
)
State and Local Government
208

 
1

 

 
255

 
1

 

Subtotal Fixed Income Securities
953

 
50

 
(6
)
 
901

 
29

 
(5
)
Equity Securities  Domestic
1,123

 
599

 
(79
)
 
1,012

 
506

 
(82
)
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
$
2,096

 
$
649

 
$
(85
)
 
$
1,932

 
$
535

 
$
(87
)

The following table provides the securities activity within the decommissioning and SNF trusts for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales
$
1,032

 
$
858

 
$
988

Purchases of Investments
1,086

 
910

 
1,045

Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales
32

 
18

 
25

Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales
15

 
8

 
9


The adjusted cost of fixed income securities was $903 million and $872 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The adjusted cost of equity securities was $524 million and $506 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.


132


The fair value of fixed income securities held in the nuclear trust funds, summarized by contractual maturities, as of December 31, 2014 was as follows:
 
Fair Value of Fixed Income Securities
 
(in millions)
Within 1 year
$
154

1 year – 5 years
376

5 years – 10 years
179

After 10 years
244

Total
$
953


133


Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Liabilities

For a discussion of fair value accounting and the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy, see the “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” section of Note 1 .

The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  As required by the accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.  There have not been any significant changes in our valuation techniques.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a)
$
17

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
145

 
$
163

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Temporary Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash (a)
234

 
9

 

 
37

 
280

Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds
81

 

 

 

 
81

Equity Securities – Mutual Funds (b)
25

 

 

 

 
25

Total   Other Temporary Investments
340

 
9

 

 
37

 
386

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d)
37

 
528

 
190

 
(302
)
 
453

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (c)

 
32

 

 
(16
)
 
16

Fair Value Hedges

 
1

 

 
2

 
3

Total Risk Management Assets
37

 
561

 
190

 
(316
)
 
472

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (f)
9

 

 

 
11

 
20

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government

 
697

 

 

 
697

Corporate Debt

 
48

 

 

 
48

State and Local Government

 
208

 

 

 
208

Subtotal Fixed Income Securities

 
953

 

 

 
953

Equity Securities – Domestic (b)
1,123

 

 

 

 
1,123

Total   Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
1,132

 
953

 

 
11

 
2,096

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
1,526

 
$
1,524

 
$
190

 
$
(123
)
 
$
3,117

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d)
$
65

 
$
432

 
$
36

 
$
(334
)
 
$
199

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (c)

 
27

 
3

 
(16
)
 
14

Interest Rate/Foreign Currency Hedges

 
1

 

 

 
1

Fair Value Hedges

 
7

 

 
2

 
9

Total Risk Management Liabilities
$
65

 
$
467

 
$
39

 
$
(348
)
 
$
223


134


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a)
$
16

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
101

 
$
118

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Temporary Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash (a)
231

 
8

 

 
11

 
250

Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds
80

 

 

 

 
80

Equity Securities – Mutual Funds (b)
23

 

 

 

 
23

Total   Other Temporary Investments
334

 
8

 

 
11

 
353

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)
22

 
549

 
142

 
(273
)
 
440

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (c)

 
15

 

 
(8
)
 
7

Fair Value Hedges

 
1

 

 
3

 
4

De-designated Risk Management Contracts (e)

 

 

 
6

 
6

Total Risk Management Assets
22

 
565

 
142

 
(272
)
 
457

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (f)
8

 

 

 
11

 
19

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government

 
609

 

 

 
609

Corporate Debt

 
37

 

 

 
37

State and Local Government

 
255

 

 

 
255

Subtotal Fixed Income Securities

 
901

 

 

 
901

Equity Securities – Domestic (b)
1,012

 

 

 

 
1,012

Total   Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
1,020

 
901

 

 
11

 
1,932

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
1,392

 
$
1,475

 
$
142

 
$
(149
)
 
$
2,860

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)
$
30

 
$
475

 
$
22

 
$
(282
)
 
$
245

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (c)

 
11

 
3

 
(8
)
 
6

Interest Rate/Foreign Currency Hedges

 
2

 

 

 
2

Fair Value Hedges

 
11

 

 
3

 
14

Total Risk Management Liabilities
$
30

 
$
499

 
$
25

 
$
(287
)
 
$
267


(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent cash deposits in bank accounts with financial institutions or with third parties.  Level 1 and Level 2 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(b)
Amounts represent publicly traded equity securities and equity-based mutual funds.
(c)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral under the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(d)
The December 31, 2014 maturity of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), is as follows:  Level 1 matures $(18) million in 2015 and $(10) million in periods 2016-2018;  Level 2 matures $31 million in 2015, $52 million in periods 2016-2018, $12 million in periods 2019-2020 and $1 million in periods 2021-2030;  Level 3 matures $50 million in 2015, $29 million in periods 2016-2018, $9 million in periods 2019-2020 and $66 million in periods 2021-2030.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.
(e)
Represents contracts that were originally MTM but were subsequently elected as normal under the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."  At the time of the normal election, the MTM value was frozen and no longer fair valued.  This MTM value will be amortized into revenues over the remaining life of the contracts.
(f)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest receivables from financial institutions.  Level 1 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(g)
The December 31, 2013 maturity of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), is as follows:  Level 1 matures $4 million in 2014 , $(11) million in periods 2015 - 2017 and $(1) million in periods 2018 - 2019 ;  Level 2 matures $25 million in 2014 , $37 million in periods 2015 - 2017 , $7 million in periods 2018 - 2019 and $5 million in periods 2020-2030;  Level 3 matures $27 million in 2014 , $60 million in periods 2015 - 2017 , $14 million in periods 2018 - 2019 and $19 million in periods 2020-2030.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.

There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .
 

135


The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of net trading derivatives and other investments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Net Risk Management
Assets (Liabilities)
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
117

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
90

Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income
 
6

Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
(108
)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
(8
)
Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(21
)
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
75

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
151

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Net Risk Management
Assets (Liabilities)
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
$
86

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
(9
)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets)
Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)
 
37

Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income
 
(3
)
Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
(16
)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
19

Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(4
)
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
7

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
117

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Net Risk Management
Assets (Liabilities)
 
 
(in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2011
 
$
69

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
(15
)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets)
Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)
 
29

Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
32

Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
1

Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(35
)
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
5

Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
$
86


(a)
Included in revenues on the statements of income.
(b)
Represents the change in fair value between the beginning of the reporting period and the settlement of the risk management commodity contract.
(c)
Represents the settlement of risk management commodity contracts for the reporting period.
(d)
Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 2.
(e)
Transfers are recognized based on their value at the beginning of the reporting period that the transfer occurred.
(f)
Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 3.
(g)
Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory liabilities/assets.
 

136


The following tables quantify the significant unobservable inputs used in developing the fair value of our Level 3 positions as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Input/Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
157

 
$
37

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price (a)
 
$
11.37

 
$
159.92

 
$
57.18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Counterparty Credit Risk (b)
 
303
FTRs
33

 
2

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price (a)
 
(14.63
)
 
20.02

 
0.96

Total
$
190

 
$
39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
Input/Range
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input
 
Low
 
High
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
132

 
$
22

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price (a)
 
$
11.42

 
$
120.72

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Counterparty Credit Risk (b)
 
316
FTRs
10

 
3

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price (a)
 
(5.10
)
 
10.44

Total
$
142

 
$
25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Represents market prices in dollars per MWh.
(b)
Represents average price of credit default swaps used to calculate counterparty credit risk, reported in basis points.

The following table provides sensitivity of fair value measurements to increases (decreases) in significant unobservable inputs related to Energy Contracts and FTRs as of December 31, 2014 :

Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2014
Significant Unobservable Input
 
Position
 
Change in Input
 
Impact on Fair Value
Measurement
Forward Market Price
 
Buy
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Higher (Lower)
Forward Market Price
 
Sell
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Lower (Higher)
Counterparty Credit Risk
 
Loss
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Higher (Lower)
Counterparty Credit Risk
 
Gain
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Lower (Higher)


137


12 .   INCOME TAXES

The details of our consolidated income taxes as reported are as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Federal:
 
 
 
 
 
Current
$
51

 
$
(45
)
 
$
(52
)
Deferred
796

 
676

 
698

Total Federal
847

 
631

 
646

 
 
 
 
 
 
State and Local:
 
 
 
 
 
Current
25

 
29

 
35

Deferred
70

 
24

 
(77
)
Total State and Local
95

 
53

 
(42
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
$
942

 
$
684

 
$
604


The following is a reconciliation of our consolidated difference between the amount of federal income taxes computed by multiplying book income before income taxes by the federal statutory tax rate and the amount of income taxes reported:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Net Income
$
1,638
 
 
$
1,484
 
 
$
1,262
 
Income Tax Expense
942
 
 
684
 
 
604
 
Pretax Income
$
2,580
 

$
2,168
 

$
1,866
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
903
 
 
$
759
 
 
$
653
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes resulting from the following items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
54
 
 
47
 
 
39
 
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(13
)
 
(14
)
 
(14
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
64
 
 
29
 
 
(33
)
Removal Costs
(24
)
 
(21
)
 
(18
)
AFUDC
(42
)
 
(31
)
 
(39
)
Valuation Allowance
(2
)
 
5
 
 
6
 
U.K. Windfall Tax
 
 
(80
)
 
15
 
Other
2
 
 
(10
)
 
(5
)
Income Tax Expense
$
942
 

$
684
 

$
604
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
36.5

%


31.5

%


32.4

%



138


The following table shows elements of the net deferred tax liability and significant temporary differences:
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in millions)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
2,653

 
$
2,900

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(13,599
)
 
(13,088
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(10,946
)
 
$
(10,188
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(7,968
)
 
$
(7,508
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(255
)
 
(273
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(811
)
 
(765
)
Securitized Assets
(753
)
 
(870
)
Regulatory Assets
(694
)
 
(609
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
60

 
66

Accrued Nuclear Decommissioning
(611
)
 
(554
)
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
47

 
233

Tax Credit Carryforward
144

 
109

Valuation Allowance
(56
)
 
(97
)
All Other, Net
(49
)
 
80

Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(10,946
)
 
$
(10,188
)

AEP System Tax Allocation Agreement

We, along with our subsidiaries, file a consolidated federal income tax return.  The allocation of the AEP System’s current consolidated federal income tax to the AEP System companies allocates the benefit of current tax losses to the AEP System companies giving rise to such losses in determining their current tax expense.  The tax benefit of the Parent is allocated to our subsidiaries with taxable income.  With the exception of the loss of the Parent, the method of allocation reflects a separate return result for each company in the consolidated group.

Federal and State Income Tax Audit Status

We are no longer subject to U.S. federal examination for years before 2011.  The IRS examination of years 2011, 2012 and 2013 started in April 2014.  Although the outcome of tax audits is uncertain, in our opinion, adequate provisions for federal income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such matters.  In addition, we accrue interest on these uncertain tax positions.  We are not aware of any issues for open tax years that upon final resolution are expected to materially impact net income.

We, along with our subsidiaries, file income tax returns in various state, local and foreign jurisdictions.  These taxing authorities routinely examine our tax returns and we are currently under examination in several state and local jurisdictions.  However, it is possible that we have filed tax returns with positions that may be challenged by these tax authorities.  We believe that adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such challenges and the ultimate resolution of these audits will not materially impact net income.  We are no longer subject to state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009.


139


Net Income Tax Operating Loss Carryforward

In 2012 and 2011, we recognized federal net income tax operating losses of $366 million and $226 million , respectively, driven primarily by bonus depreciation, pension plan contributions and other book-versus-tax temporary differences.  As of December 31, 2013, we had $156 million of unrealized federal net operating loss carryforward tax benefits.  Federal taxable income was sufficient enough in 2014 that these remaining federal net income tax operating loss tax benefits were realized in full. We recognized deferred state and local income tax benefits in 2012 and 2011. The state net income tax operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2014 are indicated in the table below:
State
 
State Net Income
Tax Operating
Loss
Carryforward
 
Year of
Expiration
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Louisiana
 
$
431

 
2029
Missouri
 
9

 
2034
Oklahoma
 
322

 
2034
Tennessee
 
3

 
2026
West Virginia
 
286

 
2032

We anticipate future taxable income will be sufficient to realize the remaining state net income tax operating loss tax benefits before the state carryforward expires for each state.

As of December 31, 2013 we had $121 million of uncertain tax positions netted against the federal net income tax operating loss carryforward tax benefits. Due to the utilization of the net operating loss carryforward in 2014, $69 million is presented as a non-current uncertain tax position. As of December 31, 2014, we have $52 million of uncertain tax positions netted against tax credit and alternative minimum tax carryforward tax benefits.

Tax Credit Carryforward

Federal and state net income tax operating losses sustained in 2012, 2011 and 2009, along with lower federal and state taxable income in 2010, resulted in unused federal and state income tax credits.  As of December 31, 2014, we have total federal tax credit carryforwards of $144 million and total state tax credit carryforwards of $22 million , not all of which are subject to an expiration date.  If these credits are not utilized, the federal general business tax credits of $74 million will expire in the years 2028 through 2033 .

We anticipate future federal taxable income will be sufficient to realize the tax benefits of the federal tax credits before they expire unused.  

In November 2014, APCo received an order from the Virginia SCC for its 2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case (see Note 4 ). As a result of the final determination pertaining to the ability to realize future tax benefits for certain state net income tax operating loss and credit carryforwards, we determined that APCo is subject to the Virginia Minimum Tax on electric suppliers and the Virginia State Income Tax is no longer applicable. As a result, we derecognized the related state income tax benefits, which had been subject to valuation allowances.

Valuation Allowance

We assess past results and future operations to estimate and evaluate available positive and negative evidence to evaluate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use existing deferred tax assets.  The positive evidence we considered is the history of positive pretax income and the fact that the tax losses resulted from temporary differences that will reverse in future periods.  On the basis of the evaluation of all available positive and negative evidence, as of December 31, 2014, a valuation allowance of $56 million for an unrealized capital loss has been recorded in order to recognize only the portion of the deferred tax assets that, more likely than not, will be realized. The amount of the deferred tax assets realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are materially impacted.

140


Uncertain Tax Positions

In May 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the U.K. Windfall Tax imposed upon U.K. electric companies privatized between 1984 and 1996 is a creditable tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  We filed protective claims asserting the creditability of the tax, dependent upon the outcome of the case.  As a result of the favorable U.S. Supreme Court decision, we recognized a tax benefit of $80 million , plus $43 million of pretax interest income in the second quarter of 2013.  The tax benefit and interest income resulted in an increase in net income of $108 million , but did not result in the receipt of cash as of December 31, 2014. Due to the timing of the IRS audit cycle, receipt of cash is not expected within the next 12 months.

We recognize interest accruals related to uncertain tax positions in interest income or expense, as applicable, and penalties in Other Operation expense in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Income Taxes.”

The following table shows amounts reported for interest expense, interest income and reversal of prior period interest expense:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Interest Expense
$
3

 
$
1

 
$
11

Interest Income
1

 
51

 

Reversal of Prior Period Interest Expense
2

 

 
1


The following table shows balances for amounts accrued for the receipt of interest and the payment of interest and penalties:
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in millions)
Accrual for Receipt of Interest
$
44

 
$
43

Accrual for Payment of Interest and Penalties
6

 
5


The reconciliations of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Balance as of January 1,
$
175

 
$
267

 
$
168

Increase  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period
18

 

 
23

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period
(1
)
 
(94
)
 
(16
)
Increase  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 
2

 
121

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

Decrease  Settlements with Taxing Authorities
(1
)
 

 
(25
)
Decrease  Lapse of the Applicable Statute of Limitations
(9
)
 

 
(4
)
Balance as of December 31,
$
182


$
175


$
267


The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $97 million , $87 million and $149 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  We believe there will be no significant net increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date.

Federal Tax Legislation

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the 2012 Act) was enacted in January 2013.  Included in the 2012 Act was a one-year extension of 50% bonus depreciation.  The 2012 Act also retroactively extended the life of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits, which expired at the end of 2011.  The enacted provisions did not materially impact net income or financial condition but did have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2013.


141


The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (the 2014 Act) was enacted in December 2014. Included in the 2014 Act was a one-year extension of the 50% bonus depreciation. The 2014 Act also retroactively extended the life of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits, which expired at the end of 2013. The enacted provisions did not materially impact net income or financial condition but will have a favorable impact on future cash flows.

Federal Tax Regulations

In 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department issued final and re-proposed regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property, effective for the tax years beginning in 2014.  In addition, the IRS issued Revenue Procedures under the Industry Issue Resolutions program that provides specific guidance for the implementation of the regulations for the electric utility industry.  These final regulations did not materially impact net income, cash flows or financial condition.

State Tax Legislation

Legislation was passed by the state of Indiana in May 2011 enacting a phased reduction in corporate income tax rate from 8.5% to 6.5% .  The 8.5% Indiana corporate income tax rate will be reduced 0.5% each year beginning after June 30, 2012 with the final reduction occurring in years beginning after June 30, 2015.

In May 2011, Michigan repealed its Business Tax regime and replaced it with a traditional corporate net income tax rate of 6% , effective January 1, 2012.

During the third quarter of 2013, it was determined that the state of West Virginia had achieved certain minimum levels of shortfall reserve funds.  As a result, the West Virginia corporate income tax rate was reduced from 7% to 6.5% in 2014.  

The enacted provisions did not materially impact net income, cash flows or financial condition.

142


13 .   LEASES

Leases of property, plant and equipment are for remaining periods up to 35 years and require payments of related property taxes, maintenance and operating costs.  The majority of the leases have purchase or renewal options and will be renewed or replaced by other leases.

Lease rentals for both operating and capital leases are generally charged to Other Operation and Maintenance expense in accordance with rate-making treatment for regulated operations.  Additionally, for regulated operations with capital leases, a capital lease asset and offsetting liability are recorded at the present value of the remaining lease payments for each reporting period.  Capital leases for nonregulated property are accounted for as if the assets were owned and financed.  The components of rental costs are as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Lease Rental Costs
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in millions)
Net Lease Expense on Operating Leases
 
$
304

 
$
327

 
$
346

Amortization of Capital Leases
 
109

 
74

 
73

Interest on Capital Leases
 
26

 
28

 
29

Total Lease Rental Costs
 
$
439

 
$
429

 
$
448


The following table shows the property, plant and equipment under capital leases and related obligations recorded on the balance sheets.  Capital lease obligations are included in Other Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the balance sheets.
 
 
December 31,
Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Generation
 
$
104

 
$
103

Other Property, Plant and Equipment
 
683

 
627

Total Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases
 
787

 
730

Accumulated Amortization
 
240

 
197

Net Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases
 
$
547

 
$
533

 
 
 
 
 
Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Liability
 
$
441

 
$
428

Liability Due Within One Year
 
111

 
110

Total Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
$
552

 
$
538



143


Future minimum lease payments consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014 :
Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
Capital Leases
 
Noncancelable
Operating Leases
 
 
(in millions)
2015
 
$
134

 
$
293

2016
 
120

 
267

2017
 
98

 
253

2018
 
63

 
239

2019
 
46

 
223

Later Years
 
239

 
693

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
700

 
$
1,968

Less Estimated Interest Element
 
148

 
 
Estimated Present Value of Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
552

 
 

Master Lease Agreements

We lease certain equipment under master lease agreements.  Under the lease agreements, the lessor is guaranteed a residual value up to a stated percentage of either the unamortized balance or the equipment cost at the end of the lease term.  If the actual fair value of the leased equipment is below the guaranteed residual value at the end of the lease term, we are committed to pay the difference between the actual fair value and the residual value guarantee.  Historically, at the end of the lease term, the fair value has been in excess of the unamortized balance.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum potential loss for these lease agreements was approximately $26 million assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the lease term.

Rockport Lease

AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction in 1989 with Wilmington Trust Company (Owner Trustee), an unrelated, unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 (the Plant).  The Owner Trustee was capitalized with equity from six owner participants with no relationship to AEP or any of its subsidiaries and debt from a syndicate of banks and securities in a private placement to certain institutional investors.

The gain from the sale was deferred and is being amortized over the term of the lease, which expires in 2022.  The Owner Trustee owns the Plant and leases it equally to AEGCo and I&M.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease with the payment obligations included in the future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.  The lease term is for 33 years with potential renewal options.  At the end of the lease term, AEGCo and I&M have the option to renew the lease or the Owner Trustee can sell the Plant.  AEP, AEGCo and I&M have no ownership interest in the Owner Trustee and do not guarantee its debt.  The future minimum lease payments for this sale-and-leaseback transaction as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:
Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
AEGCo
 
I&M
 
 
(in millions)
2015
 
$
74

 
$
74

2016
 
74

 
74

2017
 
74

 
74

2018
 
74

 
74

2019
 
74

 
74

Later Years
 
222

 
222

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
592

 
$
592



144


Railcar Lease

In June 2003, AEP Transportation LLC (AEP Transportation), a subsidiary of AEP, entered into an agreement with BTM Capital Corporation, as lessor, to lease 875 coal-transporting aluminum railcars.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease.  In January 2008, AEP Transportation assigned the remaining 848 railcars under the original lease agreement to I&M ( 390 railcars) and SWEPCo ( 458 railcars).  The assignment is accounted for as operating leases for I&M and SWEPCo.  The initial lease term was five years with three consecutive five -year renewal periods for a maximum lease term of twenty years.  I&M and SWEPCo intend to renew these leases for the full lease term of twenty years via the renewal options.  The future minimum lease obligations are $11 million and $13 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, for the remaining railcars as of December 31, 2014 .  These obligations are included in the future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.

Under the lease agreement, the lessor is guaranteed that the sale proceeds under a return-and-sale option will equal at least a lessee obligation amount specified in the lease, which declines from approximately 83% of the projected fair value of the equipment under the current five-year lease term to 77% at the end of the 20 -year term.  I&M and SWEPCo have assumed the guarantee under the return-and-sale option.  The maximum potential losses related to the guarantee are approximately $9 million and $10 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the current five-year lease term.  However, we believe that the fair value would produce a sufficient sales price to avoid any loss.

Sabine Dragline Lease

During 2009, Sabine entered into capital lease arrangements with a nonaffiliated company to finance the purchase of two electric draglines to be used for Sabine’s mining operations totaling $47 million .  The amounts included in the lease represented the aggregate fair value of the existing equipment and a sale-and-leaseback transaction for additional dragline rebuild costs required to keep the dragline operational.  These capital lease assets are included in Other Property, Plant and Equipment on our December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets.  The short-term and long-term capital lease obligations are included in Other Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on our December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets.  The future payment obligations are included in our future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.

I&M Nuclear Fuel Lease

In November 2013, I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction with IMP 11-2013, a nonaffiliated Ohio Trust, to lease nuclear fuel for I&M’s Cook Plant.  In November 2013, I&M sold a portion of its unamortized nuclear fuel inventory to the trust for $110 million .  The lease has a variable rate based on one month LIBOR and is accounted for as a capital lease with lease terms up to 54 months . The future payment obligations of $67 million are included in our future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.  The net capital lease asset is included in Other Property, Plant and Equipment and the short-term and long-term capital lease obligations are included in Other Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, on our December 31, 2014 balance sheet.  The future minimum lease payments for the sale-and-leaseback transaction as of December 31, 2014 are as follows, based on estimated fuel burn:
Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
I&M
 
 
(in millions)
2015
 
$
32

2016
 
27

2017
 
6

2018
 
2

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
67


145


14 .   FINANCING ACTIVITIES

AEP Common Stock

Listed below is a reconciliation of common stock share activity for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
Shares of AEP Common Stock
 
Issued
 
Held in
Treasury
Balance, December 31, 2011
 
503,759,460

 
20,336,592

Issued
 
2,245,502

 

Balance, December 31, 2012
 
506,004,962

 
20,336,592

Issued
 
2,109,002

 

Balance, December 31, 2013
 
508,113,964

 
20,336,592

Issued
 
1,625,195

 

Balance, December 31, 2014
 
509,739,159

 
20,336,592



146


Long-term Debt

The following details long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
 
Weighted
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate as of
 
Interest Rate Ranges as of
 
Outstanding as of
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
Type of Debt and Maturity
 
2014
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Senior Unsecured Notes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014-2044
 
5.34%
 
1.65%-8.13%
 
1.65%-8.13%
 
$
12,647

 
$
11,799

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pollution Control Bonds (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014-2038 (b)
 
2.66%
 
0.04%-6.30%
 
0.02%-6.30%
 
1,963

 
1,932

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes Payable (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014-2032
 
3.84%
 
0.983%-8.03%
 
1.164%-8.03%
 
357

 
369

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securitization Bonds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015-2031
 
3.69%
 
0.88%-6.25%
 
0.88%-6.25%
 
2,380

 
2,686

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation (d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
266

 
265

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Long-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015-2059
 
1.67%
 
1.15%-13.718%
 
1.15%-13.718%
 
1,101

 
1,360

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Interest Rate Hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6
)
 
(9
)
Unamortized Discount, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(24
)
 
(25
)
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18,684

 
18,377

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,503

 
1,549

Long-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
16,181

 
$
16,828


(a)
For certain series of pollution control bonds, interest rates are subject to periodic adjustment.  Certain series may be purchased on demand at periodic interest adjustment dates.  Letters of credit from banks and insurance policies support certain series.
(b)
Certain pollution control bonds are subject to redemption earlier than the maturity date.  Consequently, these bonds have been classified for maturity purposes as Long-term Debt Due Within One Year on the balance sheets.
(c)
Notes payable represent outstanding promissory notes issued under term loan agreements and credit agreements with a number of banks and other financial institutions.  At expiration, all notes then issued and outstanding are due and payable.  Interest rates are both fixed and variable.  Variable rates generally relate to specified short-term interest rates.
(d)
Spent nuclear fuel obligation consists of a liability along with accrued interest for disposal of spent nuclear fuel (see "SNF Disposal" section of Note 6 ).

Long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 is payable as follows:
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
2019
 
After 2019
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Principal Amount
$
2,503

 
$
1,306

 
$
1,871

 
$
1,417

 
$
1,673

 
$
9,938

 
$
18,708

Unamortized Discount, Net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(24
)
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
18,684


In January 2015 and February 2015 , I&M retired $15 million and $8 million , respectively, of Notes Payable related to DCC Fuel.

147



In January 2015, OPCo retired $22 million of Securitization Bonds.

In January 2015, PSO issued $87.5 million of 3.17% and $87.5 million of 4.09% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2025 and 2045, respectively.

In January 2015, SWEPCo remarketed $54 million of 1.6% Pollution Control Bonds due in 2019.

In January 2015, TCC retired $120 million of Securitization Bonds.

In February 2015, APCo retired $11 million of Securitization Bonds.

As of December 31, 2014 , trustees held, on our behalf, $385 million of our reacquired Pollution Control Bonds.

Dividend Restrictions

Parent Restrictions

The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive the dividends declared by our Board of Directors provided funds are legally available for such dividends.  Our income derives from our common stock equity in the earnings of our utility subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the leverage restrictions in our credit agreements, we must maintain a percentage of debt to total capitalization at a level that does not exceed 67.5% .  The payment of cash dividends indirectly results in an increase in the percentage of debt to total capitalization of the company distributing the dividend.  The method for calculating outstanding debt and capitalization is contractually defined in the credit agreements.  None of AEP’s retained earnings were restricted for the purpose of the payment of dividends.

Utility Subsidiaries’ Restrictions

Various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements may impose certain restrictions on the ability of our utility subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of dividends.  Specifically, several of our public utility subsidiaries have credit agreements that contain a covenant that limits their debt to capitalization ratio to 67.5% .  As of December 31, 2014 , the amount of restricted net assets of AEP’s subsidiaries that may not be distributed to Parent in the form of a loan, advance or dividend was approximately $7 billion .

The Federal Power Act prohibits the utility subsidiaries from participating “in the making or paying of any dividends of such public utility from any funds properly included in capital account.”  The term “capital account” is not defined in the Federal Power Act or its regulations.  Management understands “capital account” to mean the book value of the common stock.  This restriction does not limit the ability of the utility subsidiaries to pay dividends out of retained earnings. 


148


Lines of Credit and Short-term Debt

We use our commercial paper program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of our subsidiaries.  The program is used to fund both a Utility Money Pool, which funds the utility subsidiaries, and a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds the majority of the nonutility subsidiaries.  In addition, the program also funds, as direct borrowers, the short-term debt requirements of other subsidiaries that are not participants in either money pool for regulatory or operational reasons.  As of December 31, 2014 , we had credit facilities totaling $3.5 billion to support our commercial paper program.  The maximum amount of commercial paper outstanding during 2014 was $877 million and the weighted average interest rate of commercial paper outstanding during 2014 was 0.29% .  Our outstanding short-term debt was as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Type of Debt
 
Outstanding
Amount
 
Interest
Rate (a)
 
Outstanding
Amount
 
Interest
Rate (a)
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
Securitized Debt for Receivables (b)
 
$
744

 
0.22
%
 
$
700

 
0.23
%
Commercial Paper
 
602

 
0.59
%
 
57

 
0.29
%
Total Short-term Debt
 
$
1,346

 
 
 
$
757

 
 

(a)
Weighted average rate.
(b)
Amount of securitized debt for receivables as accounted for under the "Transfers and Servicing" accounting guidance.

Credit Facilities

For a discussion of credit facilities, see “Letters of Credit” section of Note 6 .

Securitized Accounts Receivable – AEP Credit

AEP Credit has a receivables securitization agreement with bank conduits.  Under the securitization agreement, AEP Credit receives financing from the bank conduits for the interest in the receivables AEP Credit acquires from affiliated utility subsidiaries.  AEP Credit continues to service the receivables.  These securitized transactions allow AEP Credit to repay its outstanding debt obligations, continue to purchase our operating companies’ receivables and accelerate AEP Credit’s cash collections.

Our receivables securitization agreement provides a commitment of $750 million from bank conduits to purchase receivables.  The agreement was increased in June 2014 from $700 million and expires in June 2016.

Accounts receivable information for AEP Credit is as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(dollars in millions)
Effective Interest Rates on Securitization of Accounts Receivable
0.22
%
 
0.23
%
 
0.26
%
Net Uncollectible Accounts Receivable Written Off
$
40

 
$
35

 
$
29


149


 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Accounts Receivable Retained Interest and Pledged as Collateral Less Uncollectible Accounts
 
$
975

 
$
929

Total Principal Outstanding
 
744

 
700

Delinquent Securitized Accounts Receivable
 
44

 
45

Bad Debt Reserves Related to Securitization/Sale of Accounts Receivable
 
13

 
16

Unbilled Receivables Related to Securitization/Sale of Accounts Receivable
 
335

 
331


Customer accounts receivable retained and securitized for our operating companies are managed by AEP Credit.  AEP Credit’s delinquent customer accounts receivable represents accounts greater than 30 days past due.


150


15 .   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

As approved by shareholder vote, the Amended and Restated American Electric Power System Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) authorizes the use of 20 million shares of AEP common stock for various types of stock-based compensation awards to employees.  A maximum of 10 million shares may be used under this plan for full value share awards, which includes performance units, restricted shares and restricted stock units.  As of December 31, 2014 , 15,825,643 shares remained available for issuance under the LTIP plan.  The AEP Board of Directors and shareholders last approved the LTIP in 2010.  The following sections provide further information regarding each type of stock-based compensation award granted by the Human Resources Committee of our Board of Directors (HR Committee).

Stock Options

We did not grant stock options in 2014, 2013 or 2012. We did have outstanding stock options from grants in earlier periods that were exercised in 2013 and 2012.  As of December 31, 2014 , we have no outstanding stock options.  We recorded compensation cost for stock options over the vesting period based on the fair value on the grant date.  The LTIP does not specify a maximum contractual term for stock options.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised is as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Stock Options
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised (a)
 
$

 
$
3,105

 
$
1,699


(a)
Intrinsic value is calculated as market price at exercise dates less the option exercise price.

A summary of AEP stock option transactions during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Outstanding as of January 1,

 
NA
 
188

 
$
30.17

 
321

 
$
29.35

Granted

 
NA
 

 
NA

 

 
NA

Exercised/Converted

 
NA
 
(187
)
 
30.18

 
(128
)
 
28.21

Forfeited/Expired

 
NA
 
(1
)
 
27.95

 
(5
)
 
27.26

Outstanding as of December 31,

 
NA
 

 
NA

 
188

 
30.17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options Exercisable as of December 31,

 
NA
 

 
NA

 
188

 
$
30.17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NA   Not applicable.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

We include the proceeds received from exercised stock options in common stock and paid-in capital.

Performance Units

Our performance units have a fair value upon vesting equal to the average closing market price of AEP common stock for the last 20 trading days of the performance period.  The number of performance units held is multiplied by the performance score to determine the actual number of performance units realized.  The performance score can range from 0% to 200% and is determined at the end of the performance period based on performance measures, which include both performance and market conditions, established for each grant at the beginning of the performance period by the HR Committee.  Performance units are paid in cash, unless they are needed to satisfy a participant’s stock ownership requirement.  In that case, the number of units needed to satisfy the participant’s largest stock ownership requirement is mandatorily deferred as AEP Career Shares until after the end of the participant’s AEP career.  AEP

151


Career Shares are a form of non-qualified deferred compensation that has a value equivalent to shares of AEP common stock.  AEP Career Shares are paid in cash after the participant’s termination of employment.  Amounts equivalent to cash dividends on both performance units and AEP Career Shares accrue as additional units.  We record compensation cost for performance units over a three-year vesting period.  The liability for both the performance units and AEP Career Shares, recorded in Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations on the balance sheets, is adjusted for changes in value.  The fair value of performance unit awards is based on the estimated performance score and the current 20 -day average closing price of AEP common stock at the date of valuation.

The HR Committee awarded performance units and reinvested dividends on outstanding performance units and AEP Career Shares for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Performance Units
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Awarded Units (in thousands)
 
17

 
1,284

 
546

Weighted Average Unit Fair Value at Grant Date
 
$
49.73

 
$
46.23

 
$
41.38

Vesting Period (in years)
 
3

 
3

 
3

Performance Units and AEP Career Shares
(Reinvested Dividends Portion)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Awarded Units (in thousands)
 
99

 
101

 
138

Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date
 
$
53.35

 
$
45.42

 
$
40.97

Vesting Period (in years)
 
(a)

 
(a)

 
(a)


(a)
The vesting period for the reinvested dividends on performance units is equal to the remaining life of the related performance units.  Dividends on AEP Career Shares vest immediately upon grant but are not paid in cash until after the participant’s termination of employment.
 
Performance scores and final awards are determined and certified by the HR Committee in accordance with the pre-established performance measures within approximately a month after the end of the performance period.  The HR Committee has discretion to reduce or eliminate the number of performance units earned but may not increase the number earned.  The performance scores for all open performance periods are dependent on two equally-weighted performance measures: (a) three -year total shareholder return measured relative to the Electric Utilities Industry Standard and Poor’s 500 Index and (b) three -year cumulative earnings per share measured relative to an AEP Board of Directors approved target.  

The certified performance scores and units earned for the three-year periods ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Performance Units
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Certified Performance Score
 
147.8
%
 
118.8
%
 
99.7
%
Performance Units Earned
 
889,697

 
749,219

 
1,096,572

Performance Units Mandatorily Deferred as AEP Career Shares
 
40,831

 
72,883

 
51,056

Performance Units Voluntarily Deferred into the Incentive Compensation Deferral Program
 
39,526

 
39,691

 
26,337

Performance Units to be Paid in Cash
 
809,340

 
636,645

 
1,019,179


The cash payouts for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Performance Units and AEP Career Shares
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Cash Payouts for Performance Units
 
$
29,263

 
$
43,925

 
$
44,968

Cash Payouts for AEP Career Share Distributions
 
4,324

 
3,675

 
11,027


152


Restricted Stock Units

The HR Committee grants restricted stock units (RSUs), which generally vest, subject to the participant’s continued employment, over at least three years in approximately equal annual increments.  Additional RSUs granted as dividends vest on the same date as the underlying RSUs on which the dividends were awarded.  Upon vesting, RSUs are converted into a share of AEP common stock, with the exception of participants subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, who are paid in cash.  In 2014, there were no RSUs granted to Section 16 participants as AEP deferred granting these and other awards until February 2015. For awards that are settled with shares, compensation cost is measured at fair value on the grant date and recorded over the vesting period.  Fair value is determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the grant date market closing price.  For awards that are paid in cash, compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period and adjusted for changes in fair value until vested.  The fair value at vesting is determined by multiplying the number of units vested by the 20 -day average closing price of AEP common stock.  The maximum contractual term of outstanding RSUs is six years from the grant date.

In 2010, the HR Committee granted a total of 165,520 RSUs to four Chief Executive Officer succession candidates as a retention incentive for these candidates.  These grants vest, subject to the candidates’ continuous employment, in three approximately equal installments on August 3, 2013, August 3, 2014 and August 3, 2015.  Of these RSUs, 55,172 vested on August 3, 2013, 55,172 vested on August 3, 2014 and 55,176 remain outstanding, excluding dividends.

The HR Committee awarded RSUs, including units awarded for dividends, for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Restricted Stock Units
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Awarded Units (in thousands)
 
64

 
644

 
497

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
$
50.36

 
$
46.24

 
$
40.69


The total fair value and total intrinsic value of restricted stock units vested during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Restricted Stock Units
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Fair Value of Restricted Stock Units Vested
 
$
18,654

 
$
15,325

 
$
10,608

Intrinsic Value of Restricted Stock Units Vested (a)
 
24,894

 
20,378

 
12,157


(a)
Intrinsic value is calculated as market price at exercise date.

A summary of the status of our nonvested RSUs as of December 31, 2014 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2014 are as follows:
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units
 
Shares/Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Nonvested as of January 1, 2014
 
1,205

 
$
42.64

Granted
 
64

 
50.36

Vested
 
(467
)
 
39.97

Forfeited
 
(19
)
 
44.57

Nonvested as of December 31, 2014
 
783

 
44.59


The total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested RSUs as of December 31, 2014 was $48 million and the weighted average remaining contractual life was 1.61 years.

153


Other Stock-Based Plans

We also have a Stock Unit Accumulation Plan for Non-employee Directors providing each non-employee director with AEP stock units as a substantial portion of their quarterly compensation for their services as a director.  The number of stock units provided is based on the closing price of AEP common stock on the last trading day of the quarter for which the stock units were earned.  Amounts equivalent to cash dividends on the stock units accrue as additional AEP stock units.  The stock units granted to Non-employee Directors are fully vested upon grant date.  Stock units are paid in cash upon termination of board service or up to 10 years later if the participant so elects.  Cash payments for stock units are calculated based on the average closing price of AEP common stock for the last 20 trading days prior to the distribution date.

We record compensation cost for stock units when the units are awarded and adjust the liability for changes in value based on the current 20 -day average closing price of AEP common stock on the valuation date.

The cash payout for stock unit distributions was $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. We had no material cash payouts for stock unit distributions for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 .

The Board of Directors awarded stock units, including units awarded for dividends, for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Stock Unit Accumulation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Awarded Units (in thousands)
 
25

 
33

 
52

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
$
54.08

 
$
45.81

 
$
41.20


Share-based Compensation Plans

Compensation cost and the actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements recognized in income and total compensation cost capitalized in relation to the cost of an asset for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Share-based Compensation Plans
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Compensation Cost for Share-based Payment Arrangements (a)
 
$
85,414

 
$
56,352

 
$
51,767

Actual Tax Benefit Realized
 
29,895

 
19,723

 
18,119

Total Compensation Cost Capitalized
 
23,063

 
13,165

 
10,707


(a)
Compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements is included in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses on the statements of income.

During the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , there were no significant modifications affecting any of our share-based payment arrangements.

As of December 31, 2014 , there was $79 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the LTIP.  Unrecognized compensation cost related to the performance units and AEP Career Shares will change as the fair value is adjusted each period and forfeitures for all award types are realized.  Our unrecognized compensation cost will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.35 years.


154


Cash received from stock options exercised and actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Share-based Compensation Plans
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
Cash Received from Stock Options Exercised
 
$

 
$
5,659

 
$
3,598

Actual Tax Benefit Realized for the Tax Deductions from Stock Options Exercised
 

 
1,040

 
618


Our practice is to use authorized but unissued shares to fulfill share commitments for stock option exercises and RSU vesting.  Although we do not currently anticipate any changes to this practice, we are permitted to use treasury shares, shares acquired in the open market specifically for distribution under the LTIP or any combination thereof for this purpose.  The number of new shares issued to fulfill vesting RSUs is generally reduced to offset our tax withholding obligation.

155


16 .   VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities” is a consolidation model that considers if a company has a controlling financial interest in a VIE.  A controlling financial interest will have both (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.  Entities are required to consolidate a VIE when it is determined that they have a controlling financial interest in a VIE and therefore, are the primary beneficiary of that VIE, as defined by the accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities.”  In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we consider factors such as equity at risk, the amount of the VIE’s variability we absorb, guarantees of indebtedness, voting rights including kick-out rights, the power to direct the VIE, variable interests held by related parties and other factors.  We believe that significant assumptions and judgments were applied consistently.

We are the primary beneficiary of Sabine, DCC Fuel, AEP Credit, Transition Funding, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding, a protected cell of EIS and Transource Energy.  In addition, we have not provided material financial or other support to any of these entities that was not previously contractually required.  We hold a significant variable interest in DHLC and Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, LLC West Virginia Series (West Virginia Series).

Sabine is a mining operator providing mining services to SWEPCo.  SWEPCo has no equity investment in Sabine but is Sabine’s only customer.  SWEPCo guarantees the debt obligations and lease obligations of Sabine.  Under the terms of the note agreements, substantially all assets are pledged and all rights under the lignite mining agreement are assigned to SWEPCo.  The creditors of Sabine have no recourse to any AEP entity other than SWEPCo.  Under the provisions of the mining agreement, SWEPCo is required to pay, as a part of the cost of lignite delivered, an amount equal to mining costs plus a management fee.  In addition, SWEPCo determines how much coal will be mined each year.  Based on these facts, management concluded that SWEPCo is the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate Sabine.  SWEPCo’s total billings from Sabine for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $151 million , $155 million and $147 million , respectively.  See the tables below for the classification of Sabine’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

I&M has nuclear fuel lease agreements with DCC Fuel IV LLC, DCC Fuel V LLC, DCC Fuel VI LLC and DCC Fuel VII (collectively DCC Fuel).  DCC Fuel was formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and leasing nuclear fuel to I&M.  DCC Fuel purchased the nuclear fuel from I&M with funds received from the issuance of notes to financial institutions.  Each entity is a single-lessee leasing arrangement with only one asset and is capitalized with all debt.  Each is a separate legal entity from I&M, the assets of which are not available to satisfy the debts of I&M.  Payments on the leases for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $109 million , $153 million and $127 million , respectively.  The leases were recorded as capital leases on I&M’s balance sheet as title to the nuclear fuel transfers to I&M at the end of the respective lease terms, which do not exceed 54 months .  Based on our control of DCC Fuel, management concluded that I&M is the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate DCC Fuel.  The capital leases are eliminated upon consolidation.  The lease agreements ended for DCC Fuel LLC and DCC Fuel III LLC in October 2013 and for DCC Fuel II LLC in October 2014.  See the tables below for the classification of DCC Fuel’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

AEP Credit is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.  AEP Credit purchases, without recourse, accounts receivable from certain utility subsidiaries of AEP to reduce working capital requirements.  AEP provides a minimum of 5% equity and up to 20% of AEP Credit’s short-term borrowing needs in excess of third party financings.  Any third party financing of AEP Credit only has recourse to the receivables securitized for such financing.  Based on our control of AEP Credit, management concluded that we are the primary beneficiary and are required to consolidate AEP Credit.  See the tables below for the classification of AEP Credit’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.  See “Securitized Accounts Receivables – AEP Credit” section of Note 14 .


156


Transition Funding was formed for the sole purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to Texas Restructuring Legislation.  Management has concluded that TCC is the primary beneficiary of Transition Funding because TCC has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and TCC’s equity interest could potentially be significant.  Therefore, TCC is required to consolidate Transition Funding.  The securitized bonds totaled $1.8 billion and $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  Transition Funding has securitized transition assets of $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The securitized transition assets represent the right to impose and collect Texas true-up costs from customers receiving electric transmission or distribution service from TCC under recovery mechanisms approved by the PUCT.  The securitization bonds are payable only from and secured by the securitized transition assets.  The bondholders have no recourse to TCC or any other AEP entity.  TCC acts as the servicer for Transition Funding’s securitized transition assets and remits all related amounts collected from customers to Transition Funding for interest and principal payments on the securitization bonds and related costs.  See the tables below for the classification of Transition Funding’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding was formed for the sole purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to phase-in recovery property.  Management has concluded that OPCo is the primary beneficiary of Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding because OPCo has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and OPCo's equity interest could potentially be significant.  Therefore, OPCo is required to consolidate Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding.  The securitized bonds totaled $232 million and $267 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding has securitized assets of $110 million and $132 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The phase-in recovery property represents the right to impose and collect Ohio deferred distribution charges from customers receiving electric transmission and distribution service from OPCo under a recovery mechanism approved by the PUCO.  In August 2013, securitization bonds were issued.  The securitization bonds are payable only from and secured by the securitized assets.  The bondholders have no recourse to OPCo or any other AEP entity.  OPCo acts as the servicer for Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding's securitized assets and remits all related amounts collected from customers to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding for interest and principal payments on the securitization bonds and related costs.  See the table below for the classification of Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding's assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding was formed for the sole purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to APCo's under-recovered ENEC deferral balance.  Management has concluded that APCo is the primary beneficiary of Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding because APCo has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and APCo's equity interest could potentially be significant.  Therefore, APCo is required to consolidate Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding.  The securitized bonds totaled $368 million and $380 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.   Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding has securitized assets of $350 million and $369 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The phase-in recovery property represents the right to impose and collect West Virginia deferred generation charges from customers receiving electric transmission, distribution and generation service from APCo under a recovery mechanism approved by the WVPSC.  In November 2013, securitization bonds were issued.  The securitization bonds are payable only from and secured by the securitized assets.  The bondholders have no recourse to APCo or any other AEP entity.  APCo acts as the servicer for Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding's securitized assets and remits all related amounts collected from customers to Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding for interest and principal payments on the securitization bonds and related costs.  See the table below for the classification of Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding's assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

The securitized bonds of Transition Funding, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding and Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding are included in current and long-term debt on the balance sheets.  The securitized assets of Transition Funding, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding and Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding are included in securitized assets on the balance sheets.

Our subsidiaries participate in one protected cell of EIS for approximately ten lines of insurance.  EIS has multiple protected cells.  Neither AEP nor its subsidiaries have an equity investment in EIS.  The AEP System is essentially this EIS cell’s only participant, but allows certain third parties access to this insurance.  Our subsidiaries and any allowed

157


third parties share in the insurance coverage, premiums and risk of loss from claims.  Based on our control and the structure of the protected cell of EIS, management concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of the protected cell and are required to consolidate the protected cell of EIS.  Our insurance premium expense to the protected cell for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $32 million , $31 million and $32 million , respectively.  See the tables below for the classification of the protected cell’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

Transource Energy was formed for the purpose of investing in utilities which develop, acquire, construct, own and operate transmission facilities in accordance with FERC-approved rates. AEP has equity and voting ownership of 86.5% with the other owner having 13.5% interest. Management has concluded that Transource Energy is a VIE and that AEP is the primary beneficiary because AEP has the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity. Therefore, AEP is required to consolidate Transource Energy. AEP’s equity interest could potentially be significant. In January 2014, Transource Missouri (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Transource Energy) acquired transmission assets from the non-controlling owner and issued debt and received a capital contribution to fund the acquisition. The majority of Transource Energy’s activity resulted from the asset acquisition, construction projects, debt issuance and capital contribution. AEP has provided capital contributions to Transource Energy of $23 million and $3 million , in 2014 and 2013, respectively. In the event a Transource Missouri project is abandoned by the RTO, AEP would be required to fund additional capital. See the tables below for the classification of Transource Energy’s assets and liabilities on the balance sheets.

The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of the VIEs that are consolidated.  These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo
Sabine
 
I&M
DCC Fuel
 
AEP
Credit
 
TCC Transition
Funding
 
OPCo
Ohio
Phase-in-
Recovery Funding
 
APCo
Appalachian
Consumer
Rate
Relief Funding
 
Protected
Cell
of EIS
 
Transource Energy
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets
$
68

 
$
97

 
$
980

 
$
239

 
$
33

 
$
18

 
$
149

 
$
2

Net Property, Plant and Equipment
145

 
158

 

 

 

 

 

 
98

Other Noncurrent Assets
52

 
80

 

 
1,654

(a)
210

(b)
358

(c)
2

 
4

Total Assets
$
265


$
335


$
980


$
1,893

 
$
243

 
$
376

 
$
151

 
$
104

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
$
36

 
$
86

 
$
894

 
$
322

 
$
47

 
$
27

 
$
44

 
$
21

Noncurrent Liabilities
228

 
249

 

 
1,553

 
195

 
347

 
62

 
55

Equity
1

 

 
86

 
18

 
1

 
2

 
45

 
28

Total Liabilities and Equity
$
265


$
335


$
980


$
1,893


$
243


$
376


$
151

 
$
104


(a)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $75 million .
(b)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $97 million .
(c)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $4 million .

158


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2013
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo
Sabine
 
I&M
DCC Fuel
 
AEP
Credit
 
TCC Transition
Funding
 
OPCo
Ohio
Phase-in-
Recovery Funding
 
APCo
Appalachian
Consumer
Rate
Relief
 
Protected
Cell
of EIS
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets
$
67

 
$
118

 
$
935

 
$
232

 
$
23

 
$
6

 
$
143

Net Property, Plant and Equipment
157

 
157

 

 

 

 

 

Other Noncurrent Assets
51

 
60

 
1

 
1,918

(a)
252

(b)
378

(c)
3

Total Assets
$
275

 
$
335

 
$
936

 
$
2,150

 
$
275

 
$
384

 
$
146

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
$
33

 
$
108

 
$
827

 
$
312

 
$
37

 
$
14

 
$
39

Noncurrent Liabilities
242

 
227

 
1

 
1,820

 
237

 
368

 
66

Equity

 

 
108

 
18

 
1

 
2

 
41

Total Liabilities and Equity
$
275

 
$
335

 
$
936

 
$
2,150

 
$
275

 
$
384

 
$
146


(a)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $82 million .
(b)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $116 million .
(c)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $4 million .

DHLC is a mining operator that sells 50% of the lignite produced to SWEPCo and 50% to CLECO.  SWEPCo and CLECO share the executive board seats and voting rights equally.  Each entity guarantees 50% of DHLC’s debt.  SWEPCo and CLECO equally approve DHLC’s annual budget.  The creditors of DHLC have no recourse to any AEP entity other than SWEPCo.  As SWEPCo is the sole equity owner of DHLC, it receives 100% of the management fee.  SWEPCo’s total billings from DHLC for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $56 million , $60 million and $77 million , respectively.  We are not required to consolidate DHLC as we are not the primary beneficiary, although we hold a significant variable interest in DHLC.  Our equity investment in DHLC is included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets.

Our investment in DHLC was:
 
2014
 
2013
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
(in millions)
Capital Contribution from SWEPCo
$
8

 
$
8

 
$
8

 
$
8

Retained Earnings
4

 
4

 
1

 
1

Advance Due to Parent
56

 
56

 

 

Guarantee of Debt

 
48

 

 
61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Investment in DHLC
$
68


$
116


$
9


$
70



159


We and FirstEnergy Corp. (FirstEnergy) have a joint venture in Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, LLC (PATH).  PATH is a series limited liability company and was created to construct, through its operating companies, a high-voltage transmission line project in the PJM region.  PATH consists of the “West Virginia Series (PATH-WV),” owned equally by subsidiaries of FirstEnergy and AEP, and the “Allegheny Series” which is 100% owned by a subsidiary of FirstEnergy.  Provisions exist within the PATH-WV agreement that make it a VIE.  The “Allegheny Series” is not considered a VIE.  We are not required to consolidate PATH-WV as we are not the primary beneficiary, although we hold a significant variable interest in PATH-WV.  Our equity investment in PATH-WV is included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets.  We and FirstEnergy share the returns and losses equally in PATH-WV.  Our subsidiaries and FirstEnergy’s subsidiaries provide services to the PATH companies through service agreements.  The entities recover costs through regulated rates.

In August 2012, the PJM board cancelled the PATH Project, the transmission project that PATH was intended to develop, and removed it from the 2012 Regional Transmission Expansion Plan.  In September 2012, the PATH Project companies submitted an application to the FERC requesting authority to recover prudently-incurred costs associated with the PATH Project.  In November 2012, the FERC issued an order accepting the PATH Project’s abandonment cost recovery application, subject to settlement procedures and hearing.  The parties to the case have been unable to reach a settlement agreement and in March 2014, settlement judge procedures were terminated.  Litigation is ongoing and a hearing at the FERC is scheduled for March 2015.

Our investment in PATH-WV was:
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum Exposure
 
(in millions)
Capital Contribution from AEP
$
19

 
$
19

 
$
19

 
$
19

Retained Earnings
2

 
2

 
6

 
6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Investment in PATH-WV
$
21


$
21


$
25


$
25


As of December 31, 2014 , our $21 million investment in PATH-WV is included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheet.  If we cannot ultimately recover our investment related to PATH-WV, it could reduce future net income and cash flows.

160


17 .   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

We provide for depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment, excluding coal-mining properties, on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of property, generally using composite rates by functional class.  The following tables provide the annual property information:
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
18,394


$
7,313


1.7 - 3.5%

31 - 132

$
7,333


$
3,135


2.6 - 3.4%

35 - 66
Transmission
 
12,395


2,877


1.4 - 2.7%

15 - 87

38


17


2.3%

43 - 55
Distribution
 
17,157


4,145


2.4 - 3.7%

7 - 75





NA

NA
CWIP
 
3,088


(126
)

NM

NM

130


1


NM

NM
Other
 
4,361


2,254


2.1 - 8.6%

5 - 75

1,409


572


17.1%

25 - 50
Total
 
$
55,395

 
$
16,463

 
 
 
 
 
$
8,910

 
$
3,725

 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
17,873

 
$
7,168

 
1.7 - 3.7%
 
31 - 132
 
$
7,201

 
$
2,969

 
2.6 - 3.3%
 
35 - 66
Transmission
 
10,854

 
2,805

 
1.1 - 2.7%
 
25 - 87
 
39

 
16

 
2.5%
 
43 - 55
Distribution
 
16,377

 
3,988

 
2.3 - 3.8%
 
11 - 75
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
2,326

 
(121
)
 
NM
 
NM
 
145

 
1

 
NM
 
NM
Other
 
4,116

 
1,931

 
2.0 - 7.9%
 
5 - 75
 
1,354

 
531

 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
51,546

 
$
15,771

 
 
 
 
 
$
8,739

 
$
3,517

 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate Ranges
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
1.7 - 3.8%
 
31 - 132
 
2.6 - 3.3%
 
35 - 66
Transmission
 
1.2 - 2.8%
 
25 - 87
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
2.4 - 3.9%
 
11 - 75
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
NM
 
NM
 
NM
 
NM
Other
 
1.8 - 9.6%
 
5 - 75
 
NM
 
NM

NA    Not applicable.
NM    Not meaningful.

We provide for depreciation, depletion and amortization of coal-mining assets over each asset's estimated useful life or the estimated life of each mine, whichever is shorter, using the straight-line method for mining structures and equipment.  We use either the straight-line method or the units-of-production method to amortize mine development costs and deplete coal rights based on estimated recoverable tonnages.  We include these costs in the cost of coal charged to fuel expense.

For regulated operations, the composite depreciation rate generally includes a component for non-asset retirement obligation (non-ARO) removal costs, which is credited to Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization.  Actual removal costs incurred are charged to Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization.  Any excess of accrued non-ARO removal costs over actual removal costs incurred is reclassified from Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and reflected as a regulatory liability.  For nonregulated operations, non-ARO removal costs are expensed as incurred.


161


Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

We record ARO in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” for our legal obligations for asbestos removal and for the retirement of certain ash disposal facilities, closure and monitoring of underground carbon storage facilities at Mountaineer Plant, wind farms and certain coal mining facilities, as well as for nuclear decommissioning of our Cook Plant.  We have identified, but not recognized, ARO liabilities related to electric transmission and distribution assets as a result of certain easements on property on which we have assets.  Generally, such easements are perpetual and require only the retirement and removal of our assets upon the cessation of the property’s use.  We do not estimate the retirement for such easements because we plan to use our facilities indefinitely.  The retirement obligation would only be recognized if and when we abandon or cease the use of specific easements, which is not expected.

The following is a reconciliation of the 2014 and 2013 aggregate carrying amounts of ARO:
 
Carrying
Amount
of ARO
 
(in millions)
ARO as of December 31, 2012
$
1,696

Accretion Expense
103

Liabilities Incurred
4

Liabilities Settled
(22
)
Revisions in Cash Flow Estimates
54

ARO as of December 31, 2013
1,835

Accretion Expense
95

Liabilities Incurred
42

Liabilities Settled
(34
)
Revisions in Cash Flow Estimates
81

ARO as of December 31, 2014
$
2,019


As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , our ARO liability included $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion , respectively, for nuclear decommissioning of the Cook Plant.  As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the fair value of assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling the nuclear decommissioning liabilities totaled $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion , respectively, and are recorded in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on the balance sheets.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) and Interest Capitalization

Our amounts of allowance for borrowed, including interest capitalized, and equity funds used during construction is summarized in the following table:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
$
103

 
$
73

 
$
93

Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction
44

 
40

 
69



162


Jointly-owned Electric Facilities

We have electric facilities that are jointly-owned with nonaffiliated companies.  Using our own financing, we are obligated to pay a share of the costs of these jointly-owned facilities in the same proportion as our ownership interest.  Our proportionate share of the operating costs associated with such facilities is included on the statements of income and the investments and accumulated depreciation are reflected on the balance sheets under Property, Plant and Equipment as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
Company’s Share as of December 31, 2014
 
Fuel
Type
 
Percent of
Ownership
 
Utility Plant
in Service
 
Construction
Work in
Progress
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
W.C. Beckjord Generating Station, Unit 6 (a)
Coal
 
12.5
%
 
$


$


$

Conesville Generating Station, Unit 4 (b)
Coal
 
43.5
%
 
336


2


66

J.M. Stuart Generating Station (c)
Coal
 
26.0
%
 
553


12


206

Wm. H. Zimmer Generating Station (a)
Coal
 
25.4
%
 
812


4


410

Dolet Hills Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
Lignite
 
40.2
%
 
330


4


201

Flint Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 (e)
Coal
 
50.0
%
 
125


120


68

Pirkey Generating Station, Unit 1 (e)
Lignite
 
85.9
%
 
531


36


381

Oklaunion Generating Station, Unit 1 (f)
Coal
 
70.3
%
 
409


10


228

Turk Generating Plant (e)
Coal
 
73.33
%
 
1,647


1


70

Transmission
NA
 
(g)

 
82


1


49

Total
 
 
 
 
$
4,825

 
$
190

 
$
1,679

 
 
 
 
 
Company’s Share as of December 31, 2013
 
Fuel
Type
 
Percent of
Ownership
 
Utility Plant
in Service
 
Construction
Work in
Progress
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
W.C. Beckjord Generating Station, Unit 6 (a)
Coal
 
12.5
%
 
$

 
$

 
$

Conesville Generating Station, Unit 4 (b)
Coal
 
43.5
%
 
335

 
2

 
55

J.M. Stuart Generating Station (c)
Coal
 
26.0
%
 
544

 
11

 
190

Wm. H. Zimmer Generating Station (a)
Coal
 
25.4
%
 
809

 
2

 
399

Dolet Hills Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
Lignite
 
40.2
%
 
262

 
47

 
198

Flint Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 (e)
Coal
 
50.0
%
 
123

 
54

 
66

Pirkey Generating Station, Unit 1 (e)
Lignite
 
85.9
%
 
519

 
29

 
376

Oklaunion Generating Station, Unit 1 (f)
Coal
 
70.3
%
 
404

 
7

 
223

Turk Generating Plant (e)
Coal
 
73.33
%
 
1,638

 
13

 
35

Transmission
NA
 
(g)

 
78

 

 
50

Total
 
 
 
 
$
4,712

 
$
165

 
$
1,592


(a)
Operated by Duke Energy Corporation, a nonaffiliated company.  AEP's portion of Beckjord Plant, Unit 6 was impaired in the fourth quarter of 2012.  See "Impairments" section of Note 7 .
(b)
Operated by AGR.
(c)
Operated by The Dayton Power & Light Company, a nonaffiliated company.
(d)
Operated by CLECO, a nonaffiliated company.
(e)
Operated by SWEPCo.
(f)
Operated by PSO and also jointly-owned ( 54.7% ) by TNC.
(g)
Varying percentages of ownership.
NA
Not applicable.

163


18 .   COST REDUCTION PROGRAMS

2014 Disposition Plant Severance

AEP intends to retire several generation plants or units of plants during 2015. The plant closures will result in involuntary severances. The severance program provides two weeks of base pay for every year of service along with other severance benefits.

We recorded a charge to Other Operation expense in December 2014 primarily related to employees at the disposition plants.
 
 
Disposition Plant
Severance Activity
 
 
(in millions)
Incurred
 
$
29

Settled
 

Adjustments
 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
29


These expenses, net of adjustments, relate primarily to severance benefits and are included primarily in Other Operation expense on the statements of income.  Of the current period expense, approximately 32% was within the Generation & Marketing segment and 68% was within the Vertically Integrated Utilities segment.   The remaining liability is included in Other Current Liabilities on the balance sheets.  We do not expect additional severance costs to be incurred related to this initiative.

2012 Sustainable Cost Reductions

In April 2012, we initiated a process to identify strategic repositioning opportunities and efficiencies that will result in sustainable cost savings.  We selected a consulting firm to facilitate an organizational and process evaluation and a second firm to evaluate our current employee benefit programs.  The process resulted in involuntary severances and was completed by the end of the first quarter of 2013.  The severance program provides two weeks of base pay for every year of service along with other severance benefits.

We recorded charges to Other Operation expense of $7 million and $47 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily related to severance benefits as a result of the sustainable cost reductions initiative.  



164


19 .   UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

In our opinion, the unaudited quarterly information reflects all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations for interim periods.  Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of a full year’s operations because of various factors.  Our unaudited quarterly financial information is as follows:
 
2014 Quarterly Periods Ended
 
March 31
 
June 30
 
September 30
 
December 31
 
 
(in millions  except per share amounts)
Total Revenues
$
4,648

 
$
4,044

 
$
4,302

 
$
4,026

 
Operating Income
1,041

 
767

 
925

 
499

(a)
Net Income
561

 
391

 
494

 
192

(a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
560

 
390

 
493

 
191

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Basic Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders (b)
1.15

 
0.80

 
1.01

 
0.39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Diluted Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders (b)
1.15

 
0.80

 
1.01

 
0.39

 
 
2013 Quarterly Periods Ended
 
March 31
 
June 30
 
September 30
 
December 31
 
 
(in millions  except per share amounts)
Total Revenues
$
3,826

 
$
3,582

 
$
4,176

 
$
3,773

 
Operating Income
755

 
547

(c)
875

(e)
678

(f)(g)
Net Income
364

 
339

(c)(d)
434

(e)
347

(f)(g)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
363

 
338

(c)(d)
433

(e)
346

(f)(g)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Basic Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders (b)
0.75

 
0.69

 
0.89

 
0.71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Diluted Earnings per Share Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders (b)
0.75

 
0.69

 
0.89

 
0.71

 

(a)
Includes termination of a coal contract and a KPCo regulatory disallowance (see Note 4 ).
(b)
Quarterly Earnings per Share amounts are intended to be stand-alone calculations and are not always additive to full-year amount due to rounding.
(c)
Includes an impairment for Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (see Note 7 ).
(d)
Includes U.K. Windfall Tax benefit (see Note 12 ).
(e)
Includes regulatory disallowances for the Turk Plant (see Note 4 ) and for Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 (see Note 7 ).
(f)
Includes a regulatory disallowance for Amos Plant, Unit 3 (see Note 7 ).
(g)
Includes the reversal of regulatory disallowance for the Turk Plant (see Note 4 ).


165


20 .   GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The changes in our carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by operating segment are as follows:
 
Vertically
Integrated
Utilities
 
AEP River
Operations
 
Generation
and
Marketing
 
AEP
Consolidated
 
(in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
37

 
$
39

 
$
15

 
$
91

Impairment Losses

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
37

 
39

 
15

 
91

Impairment Losses

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
37

 
$
39

 
$
15

 
$
91


In the fourth quarters of 2014 and 2013 , we performed our annual impairment tests.  The fair values of the operations with goodwill were estimated using cash flow projections and other market value indicators.  There were no goodwill impairment losses.  We do not have any accumulated impairment on existing goodwill.

Other Intangible Assets

Acquired intangible assets subject to amortization were $5 million and $ 10 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, net of accumulated amortization and are included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets.  The amortization life, gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization by major asset class are as follows:
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Amortization
Life
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
(in years)
 
(in millions)
Acquired Customer Contracts
5
 
$
58

 
$
53

 
$
58

 
$
48


Amortization of intangible assets was $5 million , $14 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively.  Our estimated total amortization is $3 million and $2 million for 2015 and 2016 , respectively.

166


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES


167


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

As a public utility, APCo engages in the generation and purchase of electric power, and the subsequent sale, transmission and distribution of that power to 959,000 retail customers in its service territory in southwestern Virginia and southern West Virginia.  APCo consolidates Cedar Coal Company, Central Appalachian Coal Company, Southern Appalachian Coal Company and Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  APCo sells power at wholesale to municipalities.

Effective January 1, 2014, the Interconnection Agreement and the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement were terminated. Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved a PCA among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.  Under the PCA, APCo, I&M and KPCo will be individually responsible for planning their respective capacity obligations.   Further, the PCA allows, but does not obligate, APCo, I&M and KPCo to participate collectively under a common fixed resource requirement capacity plan in PJM and to participate in specified collective off-system sales and purchase activities.

Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved a Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent.  The Bridge Agreement is an interim arrangement to: (a) address the treatment of purchases and sales made by AEPSC on behalf of member companies that extend beyond termination of the Interconnection Agreement and (b) address how member companies will fulfill their existing obligations under the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement through the 2014/2015 PJM planning year.  Under the Bridge Agreement, AGR is committed to meet capacity obligations of member companies.

Effective January 1, 2014, AEPSC conducts power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other risk management activities on behalf of APCo, I&M and KPCo.  Power and natural gas risk management activities are allocated based on the three member companies’ respective equity positions.  Risk management activities primarily include power and natural gas physical transactions, financially-settled swaps and exchange-traded futures.  AEPSC settles the majority of the physical forward contracts by entering into offsetting contracts.  APCo shared in the revenues and expenses associated with these risk management activities with I&M and KPCo.

Under the SIA, AEPSC allocates physical and financial revenues and expenses from transactions with neighboring utilities, power marketers and other power and natural gas risk management activities based upon the location of such activity, with margins resulting from trading and marketing activities originating in PJM and MISO generally accruing to the benefit of APCo, I&M and KPCo and trading and marketing activities originating in SPP generally accruing to the benefit of PSO and SWEPCo.  Margins resulting from other transactions are allocated among APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo based upon the common shareholder's equity of these companies.
To minimize the credit requirements and operating constraints when operating within PJM, participating AEP companies, including APCo, agreed to a netting of all payment obligations incurred by any of the AEP companies against all balances due to the AEP companies and to hold PJM harmless from actions that any one or more AEP companies may take with respect to PJM.

APCo is jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of AEP companies related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.


168


Regulatory Activity

Plant Transfer

APCo and WPCo provide retail electric service at bundled rates approved by the WVPSC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis, to their respective customers. West Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through an expanded net energy cost which trues-up to actual expenses. In March 2014, APCo and WPCo filed a request with the WVPSC for approval to transfer at net book value to WPCo a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, comprising 780 MW of average annual generating capacity presently owned by AGR. In April 2014, APCo and WPCo filed testimony that supported their request and proposed a base rate surcharge of $113 million, to be offset by an equal reduction in the ENEC revenues, to be effective upon the transfer of the Mitchell Plant to WPCo. In June 2014, the FERC issued an order approving a request by AGR and WPCo to transfer AGR’s one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo.

In October 2014, a stipulation agreement between APCo, WPCo, the WVPSC staff and intervenors in the case was filed with the WVPSC. The stipulation agreement recommended approval for WPCo to acquire, at net book value, the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, excluding certain assets, and to pay AGR $20 million upon transfer, which WPCo will record as a regulatory asset, include in rate base and recover over the life of the plant. Additionally, the agreement stated that 82.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest will be reflected in rates effective from the date of the transfer via a surcharge with an offset in ENEC revenues of $93 million. The remaining 17.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest is to be included in rates by January 2020. The agreement also proposed that WPCo share the energy margins for 82.5% of the plant’s output with ratepayers and that WPCo retain all of the energy margins from sales into the wholesale market on the remaining 17.5%, to offset fixed costs associated with this portion, until the remaining portion is included in rates. In December 2014, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications related to 82.5% of the energy and capacity margin sharing. The WVPSC determined that the sharing mechanism that was proposed is reasonable and will be adopted provided the result of the sharing mechanism will be adjusted, if necessary, so that the sharing mechanism does not result in a net cost to ratepayers that exceeds the actual variable cost of generation. In January 2015, the transfer of the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo was completed. See the “Plant Transfer” section of APCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .

2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case

In March 2014, APCo filed a biennial generation and distribution base rate case with the Virginia SCC. In accordance with a Virginia statute, APCo did not request an increase in base rates as its Virginia retail combined rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013 was within the statutory range of the approved return on common equity of 10.9%. The filing included a request to decrease generation depreciation rates, effective February 2015, primarily due to the change in the expected service life of certain plants. Additionally, the filing included a request to amortize $7 million annually for two years, beginning February 2015, related to IGCC and other deferred costs. APCo also requested approval to amortize $38 million related to an accumulated deferred Virginia state income tax (ADVSIT) liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015.

In November 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order concluding that APCo's adjusted earned rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013, reflecting their ordered adjustments, was above the allowed threshold. The order included (a) a $6 million refund to customers for the years 2012 through 2013, (b) the write-off of $10 million of IGCC pre-construction costs, (c) approval to amortize a $38 million ADVSIT liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015 and (d) no change to generation depreciation rates with rates to be reviewed again in the next biennial rate case. The order also approved a new return on common equity of 9.7% effective for 2014 and 2015. The Virginia SCC did not rule on a Virginia SCC staff recommendation to write-down certain costs, for ratemaking purposes, for the biennial period based on APCo’s earnings within the statutory equity range. In January 2015, the Virginia SCC initiated a separate proceeding to address the proper treatment of APCo’s authorized regulatory assets. If any of these costs, or any additional costs that may be subject to review, are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 .


169


Potential New Virginia Legislation Affecting Biennial Reviews

In February 2015, amendments to Virginia law governing the regulation of investor-owned electric utilities were approved by the Virginia General Assembly and have been sent to the Governor. If these amendments are enacted, APCo’s existing generation and distribution base rates would freeze until after the Virginia SCC rules on APCo’s next biennial review, which APCo would file in March 2020 for the 2018 and 2019 test years. These amendments would also preclude the Virginia SCC from performing biennial reviews of APCo’s earnings for the years 2014 through 2017. Management continues to monitor this potential new legislation in Virginia.

2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case

In June 2014, APCo filed a request with the WVPSC to increase annual base rates by $156 million, based upon a 10.62% return on common equity, to be effective in the second quarter of 2015.  The filing included a request to increase generation depreciation rates primarily due to the increase in plant investment and changes in the expected service lives of various generating units.  The filing also requested recovery of $77 million over five years related to 2012 West Virginia storm costs, IGCC and other deferred costs.  In addition to the base rate request, the filing also included a request to implement a rider of approximately $38 million annually to recover vegetation management costs, including a return on capital investment.  In December 2014 and January 2015, intervenors filed testimony which proposed total annual revenue increases ranging from $30 million to $51 million based upon returns on common equity ranging from 9% to 10% and regulatory asset disallowances ranging from $6 million to $8 million.  Additionally, other intervenors proposed that the revenue requirement be based on a return on common equity of 8.7% and that $77 million of regulatory assets be disallowed.  Intervenors also recommended a disallowance of approximately $38 million related to the December 2013 transfer of OPCo's two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo.  Hearings at the WVPSC were held in January 2015.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case” section of APCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .

Litigation and Environmental Issues

In the ordinary course of business, APCo is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases which have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on regulatory proceedings and pending litigation, see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

See the “Executive Overview” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” section beginning on page 406 for additional discussion of relevant factors.


170


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KWh Sales/Degree Days
Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of KWhs)
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
12,183

 
11,914

 
11,395

Commercial
6,829

 
6,828

 
6,794

Industrial
10,314

 
10,393

 
10,778

Miscellaneous
857

 
835

 
820

Total Retail
30,183

 
29,970

 
29,787

 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale
3,087

 
9,527

 
8,153

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
33,270

 
39,497

 
37,940


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in degree days)
Actual  Heating (a)
2,645

 
2,377

 
1,783

Normal  Heating (b)
2,232

 
2,225

 
2,265

 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual  Cooling (c)
1,056

 
1,150

 
1,354

Normal  Cooling (b)
1,206

 
1,206

 
1,201


(a)
Eastern Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.


171


2014 Compared to 2013

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net Income
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
193

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
215

Off-system Sales
 
(5
)
Transmission Revenues
 
5

Other Revenues
 
(21
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
194

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(63
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(58
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(12
)
Carrying Costs Income
 
(5
)
Other Income
 
4

Interest Expense
 
(16
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(150
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(22
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
215


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:

Retail Margins increased $215 million primarily due to the following:
A $129 million increase primarily due to increases in rates in West Virginia and Virginia.  Of these increases, $105 million relate to riders/trackers which have corresponding increases in other expense items below.
An $81 million decrease in capacity settlement expenses, net of West Virginia recovery, due to the termination of the Interconnection Agreement.
A $17 million increase in weather-related usage primarily due to an 11% increase in heating degree days.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $13 million increase in PJM expenses.
Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $5 million primarily due to reduced sales volumes.
Transmission Revenues increased $5 million primarily due to increased Network Integration Transmission Service (NITS) revenue requirements. These NITS revenues are partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
Other Revenues decreased $21 million primarily due to the termination of the Interim Allowance Agreement in 2013.
 
Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:
 
Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $63 million primarily due to the following:
A $50 million increase in PJM transmission expenses. This increase was partially offset by a corresponding increase in Gross Margin above.
A $17 million increase in steam operation and maintenance expenses, primarily driven by APCo's increased ownership of the Amos Plant. This increase is partially offset by an increase in Retail Margins detailed above.

172


A $10 million increase due to the 2014 write-off of IGCC costs in Virginia.
An $8 million increase in Transmission and Distribution vegetation management expenses in Virginia.
An $8 million increase due to increased amortization of deferred transmission costs in accordance with the Virginia Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause effective May 2014. This increase in expense is offset within Retail Margins above.
A $6 million increase in other generation primarily due to higher miscellaneous power supply and hydro expenses.
A $5 million increase in employee-related expenses.
A $5 million increase due to the favorable 2013 Mountaineer Carbon Capture asset retirement obligation adjustment.
A $4 million increase in uncollectible accounts expense primarily as a result of the favorable resolution of contingencies related to pole attachments in the third quarter of 2013.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $30 million write-off in the first quarter of 2013 of previously deferred Virginia storm costs resulting from the 2013 enactment of a Virginia law.
A $24 million decrease in distribution maintenance expense due to $32 million of Virginia storm expenses in January and June 2013, partially offset by $8 million of West Virginia storm expenses in June 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $58 million primarily due to the following:
A $42 million increase due to an increase in depreciable base including the increased ownership in Amos Plant.
A $6 million increase due to amortization of Virginia environmental deferrals. This increase in expense is offset within Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $12 million primarily due to the following:
A $7 million increase in state business occupation tax and state minimum tax expense.
A $5 million increase in amortization of real and personal property taxes.
Carrying Costs Income decreased $5 million primarily due to the November 2013 securitization of the West Virginia ENEC deferral balance.
Other Income increased $4 million primarily due to an increase in AFUDC income from increased transmission projects.
Interest Expense increased $16 million primarily due to the November 2013 issuance of securitization bonds and the assumption of debt related to APCo's increased ownership of Amos Plant in December 2013. This increase is partially offset by an increase in Retail Margins detailed above.
Income Tax Expense increased $22 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and by the recording of federal income tax adjustments.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page  406 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets and pension and other postretirement benefits.

See the “Accounting Pronouncements” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406  for a discussion of accounting pronouncements.

 

173


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Appalachian Power Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in common shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015



174


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries (APCo) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  APCo’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of APCo’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, APCo’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

This annual report does not include an attestation report of APCo’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit APCo to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


175



APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution
 
$
2,899,402

 
$
3,059,577

 
$
2,948,762

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 
144,437

 
347,484

 
318,199

Other Revenues
 
9,239

 
10,345

 
9,970

TOTAL REVENUES
 
3,053,078

 
3,417,406

 
3,276,931

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 
813,399

 
769,853

 
815,979

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
456,622

 
232,702

 
211,133

Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates
 
4,661

 
830,959

 
661,238

Other Operation
 
427,726

 
311,975

 
332,936

Maintenance
 
259,348

 
273,164

 
211,702

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
39,283

 

Depreciation and Amortization
 
400,882

 
342,643

 
344,293

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
122,254

 
110,549

 
102,190

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
2,484,892

 
2,911,128

 
2,679,471

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
568,186

 
506,278

 
597,460

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Income
 
1,629

 
2,411

 
1,358

Carrying Costs Income
 
3,045

 
8,086

 
24,602

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
7,053

 
2,353

 
1,684

Interest Expense
 
(209,570
)
 
(192,982
)
 
(202,074
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
 
370,343

 
326,146

 
423,030

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
154,928

 
132,935

 
165,527

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
$
215,415

 
$
193,211

 
$
257,503

The common stock of APCo is wholly-owned by AEP.
 
See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

176


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
 (in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
215,415

 
$
193,211

 
$
257,503

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $383, $943 and $925 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
712

 
1,751

 
1,718

Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $718, $772 and $1,937 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(1,333
)
 
1,433

 
3,597

Pension and OPEB Funded Status, Net of Tax of $1,455, $15,974 and $12,562 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
2,702

 
29,665

 
23,330

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
2,081

 
32,849

 
28,645

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
$
217,496

 
$
226,060

 
$
286,148

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

177


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
260,458

 
$
1,573,752

 
$
1,160,747

 
$
(58,543
)
 
$
2,936,414

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(170,000
)
 
 
 
(170,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
257,503

 
 
 
257,503

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
28,645

 
28,645

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
260,458

 
1,573,752

 
1,248,250

 
(29,898
)
 
3,052,562

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(285,000
)
 
 
 
(285,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
193,211

 
 
 
193,211

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
32,849

 
32,849

Contribution of Amos Plant from Parent
 
 
235,810

 
 
 
 
 
235,810

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
260,458

 
1,809,562

 
1,156,461

 
2,951

 
3,229,432

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(80,000
)
 
 
 
(80,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
215,415

 
 
 
215,415

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,081

 
2,081

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
$
260,458

 
$
1,809,562

 
$
1,291,876

 
$
5,032

 
$
3,366,928

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

178


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
2,613

 
$
2,745

Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding
 
15,599

 
2,714

Advances to Affiliates
 
48,519

 
92,485

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
114,711

 
142,010

Affiliated Companies
 
67,294

 
113,793

Accrued Unbilled Revenues
 
58,022

 
55,930

Miscellaneous
 
1,956

 
412

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(2,364
)
 
(2,443
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
239,619

 
309,702

Fuel
 
113,386

 
191,811

Materials and Supplies
 
131,285

 
128,843

Risk Management Assets
 
23,792

 
21,171

Deferred Income Tax Benefits
 
23,955

 

Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs
 
66,076

 
39,811

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
13,660

 
13,758

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
678,504

 
803,040

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
6,824,029

 
6,745,172

Transmission
 
2,228,029

 
2,160,660

Distribution
 
3,258,306

 
3,139,150

Other Property, Plant and Equipment
 
373,520

 
357,517

Construction Work in Progress
 
321,495

 
184,701

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
13,005,379

 
12,587,200

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
3,823,664

 
3,617,990

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
 
9,181,715

 
8,969,210

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
857,872

 
1,003,890

Securitized Assets
 
350,170

 
369,355

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
4,891

 
16,948

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
159,230

 
148,205

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
1,372,163

 
1,538,398

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
11,232,382

 
$
11,310,648

 See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

179


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
$
166,821

 
$
169,184

Affiliated Companies
 
80,602

 
120,789

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
 
552,212

 
342,360

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Affiliated
 
86,000

 

Risk Management Liabilities
 
11,017

 
8,892

Customer Deposits
 
71,766

 
66,040

Deferred Income Taxes
 

 
6,899

Accrued Taxes
 
109,482

 
114,699

Accrued Interest
 
52,141

 
51,899

Regulatory Liability for Over-Recovered Fuel Costs
 

 
107,048

Other Current Liabilities
 
145,017

 
97,566

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
1,275,058

 
1,085,376

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
3,342,062

 
3,765,997

Long-term Debt – Affiliated
 

 
86,000

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
2,057

 
10,241

Deferred Income Taxes
 
2,288,842

 
2,232,441

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
652,867

 
631,225

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
122,300

 
152,608

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
 
127,980

 
82,264

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
54,288

 
35,064

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
6,590,396

 
6,995,840

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
7,865,454

 
8,081,216

 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 


 


Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – No Par Value:
 
 
 
 
Authorized – 30,000,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Outstanding  – 13,499,500 Shares
 
260,458

 
260,458

Paid-in Capital
 
1,809,562

 
1,809,562

Retained Earnings
 
1,291,876

 
1,156,461

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
5,032

 
2,951

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
3,366,928

 
3,229,432

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
$
11,232,382

 
$
11,310,648

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .


180


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
215,415

 
$
193,211

 
$
257,503

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
400,882

 
342,643

 
344,293

Deferred Income Taxes
 
144,651

 
75,714

 
138,460

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
39,283

 

Carrying Costs Income
 
(3,045
)
 
(8,086
)
 
(24,602
)
Amortization (Deferral) of Storm Costs
 
6,816

 
36,068

 
(87,992
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(7,053
)
 
(2,353
)
 
(1,684
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
3,302

 
12,288

 
10,130

Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust
 
(8,963
)
 

 
(25,199
)
Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
(119,592
)
 
59,174

 
96,774

Change in Regulatory Assets
 
(6,167
)
 
(10,108
)
 
(31,104
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
(12,532
)
 
(22,894
)
 
(21,724
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
48,748

 
15,707

 
24,206

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
68,586

 
12,470

 
42,161

Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
75,983

 
28,042

 
(40,268
)
Accounts Payable
 
(62,764
)
 
(31,951
)
 
12,547

Accrued Taxes, Net
 
(5,380
)
 
81,228

 
(14,396
)
Other Current Assets
 
(962
)
 
5,626

 
3,706

Other Current Liabilities
 
23,812

 
(11,667
)
 
7,234

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
761,737

 
814,395

 
690,045

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(497,400
)
 
(380,974
)
 
(469,052
)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 
43,966

 
(69,461
)
 
(1,016
)
Other Investing Activities
 
(5,460
)
 
(1,231
)
 
7,209

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(458,894
)
 
(451,666
)
 
(462,859
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
394,189

 
444,437

 
339,374

Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 

 
(173,965
)
 
(24,283
)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
(612,710
)
 
(345,029
)
 
(364,875
)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(5,618
)
 
(5,550
)
 
(6,496
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(80,000
)
 
(285,000
)
 
(170,000
)
Other Financing Activities
 
1,164

 
1,547

 
353

Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
(302,975
)
 
(363,560
)
 
(225,927
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
(132
)
 
(831
)
 
1,259

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
2,745

 
3,576

 
2,317

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
2,613

 
$
2,745

 
$
3,576

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
196,716

 
$
184,584

 
$
200,383

Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes
 
15,899

 
(27,759
)
 
31,418

Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
4,908

 
4,351

 
3,366

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
72,009

 
50,829

 
62,177

Noncash Contribution of Amos Plant from Parent
 

 
235,810

 

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

181


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES
The notes to APCo's financial statements are combined with the notes to financial statements for other registrant subsidiaries. Listed below are the notes that apply to APCo.  The footnotes begin on page 244 .
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Disposition and Impairments
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Related Party Transactions
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information

182


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES


183


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

As a public utility, I&M engages in the generation and purchase of electric power, and the subsequent sale, transmission and distribution of that power to 588,000 retail customers in its service territory in northern and eastern Indiana and a portion of southwestern Michigan.  I&M consolidates Blackhawk Coal Company and Price River Coal Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  I&M also consolidates DCC Fuel.  I&M sells power at wholesale to municipalities and electric cooperatives.  I&M’s River Transportation Division provides barging services to affiliates and nonaffiliated companies.  The revenues from barging represent the majority of other revenues.

Effective January 1, 2014, the Interconnection Agreement and the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement were terminated. Effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved a PCA among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.  Under the PCA, APCo, I&M and KPCo will be individually responsible for planning their respective capacity obligations.   Further, the PCA allows, but does not obligate, APCo, I&M and KPCo to participate collectively under a common fixed resource requirement capacity plan in PJM and to participate in specified collective off-system sales and purchase activities.

Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved a Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent.  The Bridge Agreement is an interim arrangement to: (a) address the treatment of purchases and sales made by AEPSC on behalf of member companies that extend beyond termination of the Interconnection Agreement and (b) address how member companies will fulfill their existing obligations under the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement through the 2014/2015 PJM planning year.  Under the Bridge Agreement, AGR is committed to meet capacity obligations of member companies.

Effective January 1, 2014, AEPSC conducts power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other risk management activities on behalf of APCo, I&M and KPCo.  Power and natural gas risk management activities are allocated based on the three member companies’ respective equity positions.  Risk management activities primarily include power and natural gas physical transactions, financially-settled swaps and exchange-traded futures.  AEPSC settles the majority of the physical forward contracts by entering into offsetting contracts.  I&M shared in the revenues and expenses associated with these risk management activities with APCo and KPCo.

Under a unit power agreement, I&M purchases AEGCo’s 50% share of the 2,620 MW Rockport Plant capacity unless it is sold to other utilities.  Another unit power agreement between AEGCo and KPCo provides for the sale of 390 MW of AEGCo’s Rockport Plant capacity to KPCo through 2022.  Under these agreements, I&M purchases 910 MW of AEGCo’s 50% share of Rockport Plant capacity.

Under the SIA, AEPSC allocates physical and financial revenues and expenses from transactions with neighboring utilities, power marketers and other power and natural gas risk management activities based upon the location of such activity, with margins resulting from trading and marketing activities originating in PJM and MISO generally accruing to the benefit of APCo, I&M and KPCo and trading and marketing activities originating in SPP generally accruing to the benefit of PSO and SWEPCo.  Margins resulting from other transactions are allocated among APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo based upon the common shareholder's equity of these companies.

To minimize the credit requirements and operating constraints when operating within PJM, participating AEP companies, including I&M, agreed to a netting of all payment obligations incurred by any of the AEP companies against all balances due to the AEP companies and to hold PJM harmless from actions that any one or more AEP companies may take with respect to PJM.


184


I&M is jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of AEP companies related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.

Regulatory Activity

Transmission, Distribution and Storage System Improvement Charge (TDSIC)

In October 2014, I&M filed petitions with the IURC for approval of a TDSIC Rider and TDSIC Plan for eligible transmission, distribution and storage system improvements. The initial estimated cost of the capital improvements and associated operation and maintenance expenses included in the TDSIC Plan of $787 million, excluding AFUDC, will be updated annually. The TDSIC Rider will allow the periodic adjustment of I&M's rates to provide for timely recovery of 80% of approved TDSIC Plan costs. I&M will defer the remaining 20% of approved TDSIC Plan costs to be recovered in I&M's next general rate case. In January 2015, intervenors filed testimony that recommended denial of certain portions of the TDSIC Plan including recommended changes to the capital structure, recovery of requested operation and maintenance cost allocations and the rate design within the TDSIC Rider mechanism. A hearing at the IURC was held in February 2015. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “Transmission, Distribution and Storage System Improvement Charge (TDSIC)” section of I&M Rate Matters in Note 4 .

Litigation and Environmental Issues

In the ordinary course of business, I&M is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases which have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on regulatory proceedings and pending litigation, see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Rockport Plant Litigation

In July 2013, the Wilmington Trust Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against AEGCo and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened by the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiff further alleges that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiff.  The New York court has granted a motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M. In January 2015, the court issued an opinion and order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. The court dismissed certain of the plaintiffs’ claims. Several claims remain, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.   Management will continue to defend against the remaining claims.  Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

See the “Executive Overview” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” section beginning on page 406 for additional discussion of relevant factors.

185


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KWh Sales/Degree Days
Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of KWhs)
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
5,776

 
5,778

 
5,771

Commercial
4,884

 
4,943

 
5,001

Industrial
7,640

 
7,522

 
7,556

Miscellaneous
71

 
72

 
75

Total Retail
18,371

 
18,315

 
18,403

 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale
16,468

 
10,499

 
9,782

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
34,839

 
28,814

 
28,185


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in degree days)
Actual  Heating (a)
4,664

 
4,076

 
3,042

Normal  Heating (b)
3,737

 
3,730

 
3,772

 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual  Cooling (c)
714

 
826

 
1,098

Normal  Cooling (b)
853

 
855

 
861


(a)
Eastern Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.


186


2014 Compared to 2013

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net Income
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
178

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
20

Off-system Sales
 
60

Transmission Revenues
 
11

Other Revenues
 
(33
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
58

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(54
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(22
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
2

Other Income
 
(5
)
Interest Expense
 
4

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(75
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
(5
)
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
156


The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:

Retail Margins increased $20 million primarily due to the following:
A $30 million increase due to rate recovery primarily due to a return on assets under the Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project rider effective January 2014.
A $14 million increase due to a rate increase in Indiana effective March 2013.
An $8 million increase due to an Indiana Capacity Tracker Rider effective August 2014.
A $5 million increase in weather related usage primarily due to a 14% increase in heating days, partially offset by a decrease in cooling degree days.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $27 million decrease due to lower Indiana recovery of energy efficiency program costs. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by a corresponding decrease in energy efficiency expense items discussed below.
A $14 million decrease in certain cost recovery revenues, including fuel and PJM costs.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $60 million due to higher market prices and increased sales volumes.
Transmission Revenues increased by $11 million primarily due to increased investment in the PJM region.
Other Revenues decreased $33 million primarily due to the following:
A $29 million decrease in barging. This decrease in barging is a result of River Transportation Division (RTD) no longer serving plants transferred to AGR as a result of corporate separation in Ohio. The decrease in RTD revenue was offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses for barging discussed below.
A $4 million decrease due to an MPSC order disallowing 2012 to 2014 lost revenue related to Demand Side Management (DSM).


187


Expenses and Other changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $54 million primarily due to the following:
A $28 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to increased PJM expenses.  
An $18 million increase in nuclear expenses primarily due to a prior year deferral of $8 million in expenses, as regulatory assets, for future recovery as approved by the IURC effective March 2013 and $7 million of increased refueling amortization.
A $13 million increase in steam generation primarily due to increased employee-related expenses and increased boiler plant maintenance at Rockport Plant.
An $11 million increase in administrative and general expenses.
A $9 million increase in distribution expenses primarily due to metering expenses and maintenance of overhead lines.
An $8 million increase due to accrual for future environmental remediation costs.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $26 million decrease in RTD expenses for barging activities. The decrease in RTD expenses was offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Revenues from barging activities as discussed above.
A $16 million decrease in customer services expense related to energy efficiency. The decrease in expenses was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins discussed above.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $22 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets and pension and other postretirement benefits.

See the “Accounting Pronouncements” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406  for a discussion of accounting pronouncements.

 

188


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Indiana Michigan Power Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Indiana Michigan Power Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in common shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Indiana Michigan Power Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


189


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Indiana Michigan Power Company and subsidiaries (I&M) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  I&M’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of I&M’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, I&M’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

This annual report does not include an attestation report of I&M’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit I&M to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

190



INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution
 
$
2,149,109

 
$
2,022,257

 
$
1,810,069

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 
4,198

 
219,399

 
268,408

Other Revenues  Affiliated
 
94,379

 
122,287

 
117,052

Other Revenues  Nonaffiliated
 
2,048

 
2,916

 
4,582

TOTAL REVENUES
 
2,249,734

 
2,366,859

 
2,200,111

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 
476,628

 
434,078

 
464,420

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
96,813

 
151,404

 
117,860

Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates
 
269,972

 
433,209

 
386,404

Other Operation
 
585,958

 
564,012

 
583,865

Maintenance
 
228,506

 
195,892

 
172,562

Depreciation and Amortization
 
200,196

 
177,727

 
146,619

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
86,419

 
88,676

 
80,687

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
1,944,492

 
2,044,998

 
1,952,417

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
305,242

 
321,861

 
247,694

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Income
 
4,628

 
8,521

 
3,122

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
18,873

 
19,943

 
9,724

Interest Expense
 
(93,475
)
 
(97,710
)
 
(102,739
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
 
235,268

 
252,615

 
157,801

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
79,621

 
75,111

 
39,344

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
$
155,647

 
$
177,504

 
$
118,457

The common stock of I&M is wholly-owned by AEP.
 
See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

191


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
 (in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
155,647

 
$
177,504

 
$
118,457

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $821, $2,242 and $2,590 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
1,524

 
4,163

 
(4,809
)
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $92, $377 and $598 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
171

 
700

 
1,113

Pension and OPEB Funded Status, Net of Tax of $294, $4,583 and $1,634 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(546
)
 
8,511

 
3,034

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 
1,149

 
13,374

 
(662
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
$
156,796

 
$
190,878

 
$
117,795

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

192


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
56,584

 
$
980,896

 
$
751,721

 
$
(28,221
)
 
$
1,760,980

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(75,000
)
 
 
 
(75,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
118,457

 
 
 
118,457

Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(662
)
 
(662
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
56,584

 
980,896

 
795,178

 
(28,883
)
 
1,803,775

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(72,500
)
 
 
 
(72,500
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
177,504

 
 
 
177,504

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,374

 
13,374

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
56,584

 
980,896

 
900,182

 
(15,509
)
 
1,922,153

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(125,000
)
 
 
 
(125,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
155,647

 
 
 
155,647

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,149

 
1,149

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
$
56,584

 
$
980,896

 
$
930,829

 
$
(14,360
)
 
$
1,953,949

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .


193


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
1,020

 
$
1,317

Advances to Affiliates
 
13,481

 
55,863

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
56,978

 
63,011

Affiliated Companies
 
72,582

 
78,282

Accrued Unbilled Revenues
 
503

 
17,293

Miscellaneous
 
1,625

 
5,064

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(494
)
 
(184
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
131,194

 
163,466

Fuel
 
54,623

 
53,807

Materials and Supplies
 
201,089

 
209,718

Risk Management Assets
 
22,328

 
15,388

Accrued Tax Benefits
 
24,788

 
48,832

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
27,968

 
38,103

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
476,491

 
586,494

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
3,741,831

 
3,577,906

Transmission
 
1,358,419

 
1,304,225

Distribution
 
1,698,409

 
1,625,057

Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Plant to be Retired, Coal Mining
and Nuclear Fuel)
 
1,490,820

 
1,421,361

Construction Work in Progress
 
537,237

 
427,164

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
8,826,716

 
8,355,713

Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
 
3,410,341

 
3,299,349

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
 
5,416,375

 
5,056,364

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
536,152

 
524,114

Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
2,095,732

 
1,931,610

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
3,317

 
11,495

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
137,209

 
143,657

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
2,772,410

 
2,610,876

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
8,665,276

 
$
8,253,734

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .


194


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Advances from Affiliates
 
$
142,501

 
$

Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
168,294

 
142,219

Affiliated Companies
 
76,010

 
93,773

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $85,657 and $107,143 Respectively, Related to DCC Fuel)
 
382,187

 
294,845

Risk Management Liabilities
 
5,223

 
7,029

Customer Deposits
 
35,206

 
31,103

Accrued Taxes
 
72,742

 
73,292

Accrued Interest
 
26,677

 
27,686

Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
42,050

 
46,210

Other Current Liabilities
 
150,566

 
139,088

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
1,101,456

 
855,245

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
1,645,210

 
1,744,171

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,395

 
6,946

Deferred Income Taxes
 
1,264,167

 
1,183,350

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
1,199,694

 
1,112,645

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
1,337,179

 
1,255,184

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
162,226

 
174,040

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
5,609,871

 
5,476,336

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
6,711,327

 
6,331,581

 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – No Par Value:
 
 
 
 
Authorized – 2,500,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Outstanding  – 1,400,000 Shares
 
56,584

 
56,584

Paid-in Capital
 
980,896

 
980,896

Retained Earnings
 
930,829

 
900,182

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
(14,360
)
 
(15,509
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
1,953,949

 
1,922,153

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
 
$
8,665,276

 
$
8,253,734

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

195


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
155,647

 
$
177,504

 
$
118,457

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
200,196

 
177,727

 
146,619

Deferred Income Taxes
 
70,225

 
129,109

 
53,067

Amortization (Deferral) of Incremental Nuclear Refueling Outage Expenses, Net
 
19,967

 
(31,328
)
 
13,899

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(18,873
)
 
(19,943
)
 
(9,724
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
(6,141
)
 
12,496

 
12,164

Amortization of Nuclear Fuel
 
144,236

 
130,629

 
135,905

Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
7,791

 
3,254

 
4,175

Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
(72,900
)
 
(57,106
)
 
(2,347
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
83,147

 
37,310

 
36,524

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
32,272

 
1,445

 
34,431

Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
7,813

 
(8,848
)
 
(19,321
)
Accounts Payable
 
(20,426
)
 
(11,151
)
 
15,959

Accrued Taxes, Net
 
24,812

 
(23,887
)
 
16,897

Other Current Assets
 
10,575

 
21,287

 
(10,504
)
Other Current Liabilities
 
6,929

 
575

 
11,717

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
645,270

 
539,073

 
557,918

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(484,721
)
 
(508,857
)
 
(317,284
)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 
42,382

 
61,114

 
(21,263
)
Purchases of Investment Securities
 
(1,086,437
)
 
(909,998
)
 
(1,045,422
)
Sales of Investment Securities
 
1,031,793

 
858,406

 
987,550

Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel
 
(116,168
)
 
(153,730
)
 
(106,714
)
Insurance Proceeds Related to Cook Plant Fire
 

 
72,000

 

Other Investing Activities
 
10,498

 
32,635

 
29,324

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(602,653
)
 
(548,430
)
 
(473,809
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
205,616

 
348,874

 
217,900

Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 
142,501

 

 

Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
(218,516
)
 
(370,338
)
 
(220,212
)
Proceeds from Nuclear Fuel Sale/Leaseback
 

 
110,200

 

Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(48,164
)
 
(8,030
)
 
(6,536
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(125,000
)
 
(72,500
)
 
(75,000
)
Other Financing Activities
 
649

 
906

 
281

Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities
 
(42,914
)
 
9,112

 
(83,567
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
(297
)
 
(245
)
 
542

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
1,317

 
1,562

 
1,020

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
1,020

 
$
1,317

 
$
1,562

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
81,580

 
$
90,079

 
$
98,130

Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes
 
(10,204
)
 
(31,271
)
 
(21,196
)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
16,434

 
114,077

 
6,243

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
66,114

 
85,423

 
112,622

Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
44,529

 
35

 
35,493

Expected Reimbursement for Capital Cost of Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Cask Storage
 
3,392

 
4,352

 
30,332

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

196


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES
The notes to I&M's financial statements are combined with the notes to financial statements for other registrant subsidiaries. Listed below are the notes that apply to I&M.  The footnotes begin on page 244 .
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Related Party Transactions
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information


197


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


198


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

As a public utility, OPCo engages in the transmission and distribution of power to 1,466,000 retail customers in the northwestern, central, eastern and southern sections of Ohio.  OPCo purchases energy and capacity to serve its remaining generation service customers.  In accordance with the PUCO’s corporate separation order, OPCo remains responsible to provide power and capacity to OPCo customers who have not switched electric providers.  Effective January 1, 2014, OPCo purchased power from both affiliated and nonaffiliated entities, subject to auction requirements and PUCO approval, to meet the energy and capacity needs of customers.  OPCo consolidates Ohio Phase-in Recovery Funding LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiary.

Effective January 1, 2014, the Interconnection Agreement and the AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement were terminated. Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved a Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent.  The Bridge Agreement is an interim arrangement to: (a) address the treatment of purchases and sales made by AEPSC on behalf of member companies that extend beyond termination of the Interconnection Agreement and (b) address how member companies will fulfill their existing obligations under the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement through the 2014/2015 PJM planning year.  Under the Bridge Agreement, AGR is committed to meet capacity obligations of member companies.

Additionally, effective January 1, 2014, AGR and OPCo received approval for a Power Supply Agreement (PSA).  The PSA provides for AGR to supply capacity for OPCo’s switched (at $188.88/MW day) and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015 and to supply the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that is not acquired through auctions from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

In 2007, OPCo and AEGCo entered into a 10-year unit power agreement for the entire output from the Lawrenceburg Plant with an option for an additional 2-year period.  OPCo paid AEGCo for the capacity, depreciation, fuel, operation, maintenance and tax expenses.  These payments were due regardless of whether the plant operated.  Effective January 1, 2014, OPCo assigned the unit power agreement to AGR.

Effective January 1, 2014, AEPSC conducts only gasoline, diesel fuel, energy procurement and FTR price risk management activities on OPCo’s behalf.  With the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets to AGR, OPCo will no longer participate in other risk management activities.  

To minimize the credit requirements and operating constraints of operating within PJM, participating AEP companies, including OPCo, agreed to a netting of all payment obligations incurred by any of the AEP companies against all balances due to the AEP companies and to hold PJM harmless from actions that any one or more AEP companies may take with respect to PJM.

OPCo is jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of AEP companies related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.

Ormet

Ormet had a contract to purchase power from OPCo through 2018.  In October 2013, Ormet announced that it was unable to emerge from bankruptcy and shut down operations effective immediately.  The loss of Ormet's load will not have a material impact on future gross margin.


199


Regulatory Activity

Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings

2009 - 2011 ESP

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate proceeding which implemented a PIRR to recover OPCo’s deferred fuel costs in rates beginning September 2012. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Ohio were held in February 2015. OPCo presented arguments to reinstate a WACC carrying charge and to defend against an intervenor argument that the carrying charges should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit. 
 
June 2012 - May 2015 Ohio ESP Including Capacity Charge

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order which adopted and modified a new ESP that establishes base generation rates through May 2015. This ruling was generally upheld in PUCO rehearing orders in January and March 2013.

In July 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate capacity proceeding which stated that OPCo must charge CRES providers the RPM price and authorized OPCo to defer a portion of its incurred capacity costs not recovered from CRES providers up to $188.88/MW day. The OPCo RPM price collected from CRES providers, which includes reserve margins, was approximately $34/MW day through May 2014 and is $150/MW day from June 2014 through May 2015. In December 2012, various parties filed notices of appeal of the capacity costs decision with the Supreme Court of Ohio.

As part of the August 2012 ESP order, the PUCO established a non-bypassable RSR, effective September 2012. The RSR was collected from customers at $3.50/MWh through May 2014 and is currently collected at $4.00/MWh for the period June 2014 through May 2015, with $1.00/MWh applied to the recovery of deferred capacity costs. In April and May 2013, OPCo and various intervenors filed appeals with the Supreme Court of Ohio challenging portions of the PUCO’s ESP order, including the RSR. As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo’s incurred deferred capacity costs balance was $422 million, including debt carrying costs.

In November 2013, the PUCO issued an order approving OPCo’s competitive bid process with modifications. As ordered, in 2014, OPCo conducted multiple energy-only auctions for a total of 100% of the SSO load with delivery beginning April 2014 through May 2015. For delivery starting in June 2015, OPCo will conduct energy and capacity auctions for its entire SSO load. The PUCO also approved the unbundling of the FAC into fixed and energy-related components and an intervenor proposal to blend the $188.88/MW day capacity price in proportion to the percentage of energy planned to be auctioned. Additionally, the PUCO ordered that intervenor concerns related to the recovery of the fixed fuel costs through potentially both the FAC and the approved capacity charges be addressed in subsequent FAC proceedings. Management believes that these intervenor concerns are without merit.

In January 2014, the PUCO denied all rehearing requests and agreed to issue a supplemental request for an independent auditor in the 2012 - 2013 FAC proceeding to separately examine the recovery of the fixed fuel costs, including OVEC. In March 2014, the PUCO approved OPCo’s request to implement riders related to the unbundling of the FAC. In October 2014, the independent auditor, selected by the PUCO, filed its report for the period August 2012 through May 2015 with the PUCO. If the PUCO ultimately concludes that a portion of the fixed fuel costs are also recovered through OPCo's $188.88 capacity charge, the independent auditor recommends a methodology for calculating a refund of a portion of certain fixed fuel costs. The retail share of these fixed fuel costs is approximately $90 million annually. A hearing related to this matter has not been scheduled. Management believes that no over-recovery of costs has occurred and intends to oppose the findings in the audit report.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


200


Proposed June 2015 - May 2018 ESP

In December 2013, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO to approve an ESP that includes proposed rate adjustments and the continuation and modification of certain existing riders effective June 2015 through May 2018. The proposal included a return on common equity of 10.65% on capital costs for certain riders and estimates an average decrease in rates of 9% over the three-year term of the plan for customers who receive their RPM capacity and energy auction-based generation through OPCo. The proposal also included a purchased power agreement (PPA) rider that would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based purchase power agreement. In May 2014, intervenors and the PUCO staff filed testimony that provided various recommendations including the rejection and/or modification of various riders, including the Distribution Investment Rider and the proposed PPA. Hearings at the PUCO in the ESP case were held in June 2014.

In July 2014, OPCo submitted a separate application to continue the RSR established in the June 2012 - May 2015 ESP to collect the unrecovered portion of the deferred capacity costs at the rate of $4.00/MWh, until the balance of the capacity deferrals has been collected.

In October 2014, OPCo filed a separate application with the PUCO to propose a new extended PPA for inclusion in the PPA rider, discussed above. The new PPA would include an additional 2,671 MW to be purchased from AGR over the life of the respective generating units.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings” section of OPCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .

Litigation and Environmental Issues

In the ordinary course of business, OPCo is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases which have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on regulatory proceedings and pending litigation, see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

See the “Executive Overview” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” section beginning on page 406 for additional discussion of relevant factors.


201


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KWh Sales/Degree Days
Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of KWhs)
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
14,637

 
14,486

 
14,485

Commercial
14,400

 
14,188

 
14,176

Industrial
14,541

 
15,915

 
18,122

Miscellaneous
123

 
125

 
120

Total Retail (a)
43,701

 
44,714

 
46,903

 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale
2,198

(b)
12,828

 
13,221

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
45,899

 
57,542

 
60,124


(a)
Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.
(b)
Ohio's contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold into PJM.

Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in degree days)
Actual  Heating (a)
3,734

 
3,383

 
2,610

Normal  Heating (b)
3,230

 
3,229

 
3,276

 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual  Cooling (c)
949

 
1,029

 
1,248

Normal  Cooling (b)
960

 
954

 
948


(a)
Eastern Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.


202


2014 Compared to 2013

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net Income
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
410

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins
 
(879
)
Off-system Sales
 
(124
)
Transmission Revenues
 
69

Other Revenues
 
(39
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
(973
)
 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
237

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 
154

Depreciation and Amortization
 
169

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
54

Other Income
 
8

Carrying Costs Income
 
10

Interest Expense
 
54

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
686

 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
93

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
216


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:

Retail Margins decreased $879 million primarily due to the following:
A $781 million decrease due to the impacts of corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013 and an increase in regulatory provisions. In addition, this decrease includes customers switching to alternative CRES providers, partially offset by an increase in Transmission Revenues detailed below.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $43 million increase in revenues associated with the Storm Damage Recovery Rider. This increase in Retail Margins is offset by an increase primarily in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $124 million due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
Transmission Revenues increased $69 million primarily due to customers who have switched to alternative CRES providers, rate increases for customers in the PJM region and increased transmission investment.  The increase in transmission revenues related to CRES providers primarily offsets lost revenues included in Retail Margins above.
Other Revenues decreased $39 million due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013. This decrease has a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
 

203


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $237 million primarily due to the following:
A $447 million decrease due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $129 million increase in PJM expenses. This increase was partially offset by a corresponding increase in Gross Margin above.
A $40 million increase due to the amortization of 2012 deferred storm expenses. This increase was offset by a corresponding increase in Retail Margins above.
An $18 million increase in remitted Universal Service Fund (USF) surcharge payments to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This increase was offset by a corresponding increase in Retail Margins above.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $154 million primarily due to the 2013 impairment of Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses   decreased $169 million primarily due to the following:
A $195 million decrease due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $10 million increase due to an increase in depreciable base of transmission and distribution assets.
A $9 million increase in amortization of securitized assets being recovered through the Deferred Asset Phase-In Rider. This increase was offset by a corresponding increase in Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $54 million due to the following:
A $62 million decrease due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $9 million increase in property taxes due to increased investment in transmission and distribution assets and increased tax rates.
Other Income increased $8 million due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
Carrying Costs Income increased $10 million primarily due to increased capacity deferral carrying charges.
Interest Expense decreased $54 million primarily due to corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets and liabilities that took effect December 31, 2013.
Income Tax Expense decreased $93 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income.


204


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets and pension and other postretirement benefits.

See the “Accounting Pronouncements” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406  for a discussion of accounting pronouncements.

 

205


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Ohio Power Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ohio Power Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in common shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ohio Power Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State s of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015



206


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Ohio Power Company and Subsidiaries (OPCo) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  OPCo’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of OPCo’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, OPCo’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

This annual report does not include an attestation report of OPCo’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit OPCo to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

207



OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution
 
$
3,204,926

 
$
3,562,224

 
$
4,022,116

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 
165,216

 
1,166,854

 
847,294

Other Revenues – Affiliated
 

 
18,140

 
39,401

Other Revenues – Nonaffiliated
 
6,778

 
15,397

 
19,385

TOTAL REVENUES
 
3,376,920

 
4,762,615

 
4,928,196

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 

 
1,496,856

 
1,471,316

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
282,000

 
151,561

 
205,845

Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates
 
1,192,700

 
349,732

 
380,706

Amortization of Generation Deferrals
 
110,942

 

 

Other Operation
 
594,776

 
707,953

 
669,981

Maintenance
 
195,964

 
319,625

 
319,324

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
154,304

 
287,031

Depreciation and Amortization
 
213,669

 
382,570

 
511,070

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
353,364

 
406,916

 
405,976

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
2,943,415

 
3,969,517

 
4,251,249

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
433,505

 
793,098

 
676,947

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Income
 
9,956

 
3,325

 
3,536

Carrying Costs Income
 
26,546

 
16,312

 
16,942

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
6,913

 
4,961

 
3,492

Interest Expense
 
(128,291
)
 
(182,046
)
 
(213,100
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
 
348,629

 
635,650

 
487,817

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
132,207

 
225,670

 
144,283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
$
216,422

 
$
409,980

 
$
343,534

The common stock of OPCo is wholly-owned by AEP.
 
See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

208


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
216,422

 
$
409,980

 
$
343,534

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $796, $191 and $282 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(1,477
)
 
(355
)
 
(523
)
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $0, $6,736 and $6,979 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 

 
12,509

 
12,961

Pension and OPEB Funded Status, Net of Tax of $0, $35,225 and $10,533 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 

 
65,418

 
19,559

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 
(1,477
)
 
77,572

 
31,997

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
$
214,945

 
$
487,552

 
$
375,531

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

209


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
321,201

 
$
1,744,099

 
$
2,582,600

 
$
(197,722
)
 
$
4,450,178

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(300,000
)
 
 
 
(300,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
343,534

 
 
 
343,534

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
31,997

 
31,997

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
321,201

 
1,744,099

 
2,626,134

 
(165,725
)
 
4,525,709

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(375,000
)
 
 
 
(375,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
409,980

 
 
 
409,980

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
77,572

 
77,572

Deferred State Income Tax Rate Adjustment
 
 
(4,971
)
 
 
 
 
 
(4,971
)
Distribution of Cook Coal Terminal to Parent
 
 
 
 
(22,303
)
 
19,652

 
(2,651
)
Distribution of OPCo Generation to Parent
 
 
(1,075,346
)
 
(2,005,608
)
 
75,580

 
(3,005,374
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
321,201

 
663,782

 
633,203

 
7,079

 
1,625,265

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Contribution from Parent
 
 
175,000

 
 
 
 
 
175,000

Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(35,000
)
 
 
 
(35,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
216,422

 
 
 
216,422

Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,477
)
 
(1,477
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
$
321,201

 
$
838,782

 
$
814,625

 
$
5,602

 
$
1,980,210

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

210


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
2,870

 
$
3,004

Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding
 
28,687

 
19,387

Advances to Affiliates
 
312,473

 
339,070

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
57,906

 
67,054

Affiliated Companies
 
79,822

 
74,771

Accrued Unbilled Revenues
 
35,755

 
36,353

Miscellaneous
 
927

 
1,559

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(171
)
 
(34,984
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
174,239

 
144,753

Notes Receivable Due Within One Year – Affiliated
 
86,000

 
178,580

Materials and Supplies
 
60,909

 
53,711

Risk Management Assets
 
7,242

 
3,082

Deferred Income Tax Benefits
 
49,306

 
36,105

Accrued Tax Benefits
 
6,100

 
7,109

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
8,997

 
22,312

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
736,823

 
807,113

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Transmission
 
2,104,613

 
2,011,289

Distribution
 
4,087,601

 
3,877,532

Other Property, Plant and Equipment
 
390,848

 
364,573

Construction Work in Progress
 
218,667

 
185,428

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
6,801,729

 
6,438,822

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
2,038,120

 
1,973,042

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
 
4,763,609

 
4,465,780

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Notes Receivable – Affiliated
 
32,245

 
118,245

Regulatory Assets
 
1,318,939

 
1,378,697

Securitized Assets
 
109,999

 
131,582

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
45,102

 

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
264,150

 
260,141

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
1,770,435

 
1,888,665

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
7,270,867

 
$
7,161,558

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

211


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
$
145,328

 
$
146,307

Affiliated Companies
 
172,741

 
222,889

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $45,427 and $34,936, Respectively, Related to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding)
 
131,497

 
438,595

Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,943

 

Customer Deposits
 
53,922

 
49,140

Accrued Taxes
 
420,772

 
429,260

Accrued Interest
 
34,279

 
40,853

Other Current Liabilities
 
179,093

 
95,194

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
1,139,575

 
1,422,238

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $187,041 and $232,466, Respectively, Related to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding)
 
2,165,626

 
2,296,580

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
3,013

 

Deferred Income Taxes
 
1,405,620

 
1,330,711

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
514,691

 
435,499

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
 
36,662

 
28,329

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
25,470

 
22,936

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
4,151,082

 
4,114,055

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
5,290,657

 
5,536,293

 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – No Par Value:
 
 
 
 
Authorized – 40,000,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Outstanding  – 27,952,473 Shares
 
321,201

 
321,201

Paid-in Capital
 
838,782

 
663,782

Retained Earnings
 
814,625

 
633,203

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
5,602

 
7,079

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
1,980,210

 
1,625,265

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
 
$
7,270,867

 
$
7,161,558

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

212


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
216,422

 
$
409,980

 
$
343,534

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
213,669

 
382,570

 
511,070

Amortization of Generation Deferrals
 
110,942

 

 

Deferred Income Taxes
 
74,391

 
134,463

 
45,685

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 
154,304

 
287,031

Carrying Costs Income
 
(26,546
)
 
(16,312
)
 
(16,942
)
Deferral of Storm Costs
 

 
(1,822
)
 
(53,453
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(6,913
)
 
(4,961
)
 
(3,492
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
(44,469
)
 
17,597

 
12,143

Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust
 
(6,547
)
 

 
(43,189
)
Property Taxes
 
(4,589
)
 
(11,760
)
 
(3,849
)
Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
62,093

 
36,165

 
10,598

Deferral of Ohio Capacity Costs, Net
 
(156,986
)
 
(214,384
)
 
(65,274
)
Change in Regulatory Assets
 
115,658

 
(14,362
)
 
(72,879
)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
(38,407
)
 
46,042

 
69,229

Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
94,136

 
(52,809
)
 
(27,039
)
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
(29,788
)
 
86,640

 
(37,787
)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
(7,198
)
 
80,250

 
(54,945
)
Accounts Payable
 
(30,338
)
 
(2,919
)
 
(63,450
)
Customer Deposits
 
4,782

 
(784
)
 
(4,821
)
Accrued Taxes, Net
 
(7,212
)
 
23,839

 
41,475

Other Current Assets
 
1,568

 
7,804

 
9,977

Other Current Liabilities
 
22,923

 
(59,512
)
 
22,490

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
557,591

 
1,000,029

 
906,112

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(453,474
)
 
(640,050
)
 
(517,744
)
Change in Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding
 
(9,300
)
 
(19,387
)
 

Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 
26,597

 
4,330

 
103,036

Acquisitions of Assets
 
(3,519
)
 
(4,166
)
 
(2,915
)
Proceeds from Sales of Assets
 
1,212

 
62,975

 
7,320

Proceeds from Notes Receivable – Affiliated
 
178,580

 

 

Other Investing Activities
 
4,831

 
2,370

 
10,014

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(255,073
)
 
(593,928
)
 
(400,289
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Contribution from Parent
 
175,000

 

 

Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 

 
1,378,326

 

Issuance of Long-term Debt – Affiliated
 

 
200,000

 

Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 

 
1,143

 

Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
(438,601
)
 
(1,196,032
)
 
(194,500
)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Affiliated
 

 
(400,000
)
 

Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(5,092
)
 
(17,199
)
 
(10,072
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(35,000
)
 
(375,000
)
 
(300,000
)
Other Financing Activities
 
1,041

 
2,025

 
294

Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities
 
(302,652
)
 
(406,737
)
 
(504,278
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
(134
)
 
(636
)
 
1,545

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
3,004

 
3,640

 
2,095

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
2,870

 
$
3,004

 
$
3,640

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
132,380

 
$
195,677

 
$
212,753

Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes
 
44,036

 
93,324

 
69,771

Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
4,842

 
7,655

 
8,602

Government Grants Included in Accounts Receivable as of December 31,
 

 
300

 
660

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
43,350

 
92,324

 
84,321

Noncash Distribution of Cook Coal Terminal to Parent
 

 
(22,303
)
 

Noncash Distribution of OPCo Generation to Parent
 

 
(3,080,954
)
 

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

213


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES
The notes to OPCo’s financial statements are combined with the notes to financial statements for other registrant subsidiaries. Listed below are the notes that apply to OPCo.  The footnotes begin on page 244 .
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Disposition and Impairments
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Related Party Transactions
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information


214


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA


215


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

As a public utility, PSO engages in the generation and purchase of electric power, and the subsequent sale, transmission and distribution of that power to approximately 542,000 retail customers in its service territory in eastern and southwestern Oklahoma.  PSO sells electric power at wholesale to other utilities, municipalities and electric cooperatives. PSO shares off-system sales margins, if positive on an annual basis, with its customers.

In March 2014, SPP changed from an energy imbalance service market to a fully integrated power market. Previously, PSO and SWEPCo satisfied their load requirements with their own generation resources or through the Operating Agreement. In the new integrated power market, PSO and SWEPCo operate as standalone entities and offer their respective generation into the SPP power market. SPP then economically dispatches the resources.

AEPSC conducts power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other risk management activities on PSO’s behalf.  PSO shares in the revenues and expenses associated with these risk management activities, as described in the preceding paragraph, with SWEPCo.  Power and natural gas risk management activities are allocated based on the Operating Agreement.  Risk management activities primarily include power and natural gas and physical transactions, financially-settled swaps and exchange-traded futures.  AEPSC settles the majority of the physical forward contracts by entering into offsetting contracts.

Under the SIA, AEPSC allocates physical and financial revenues and expenses from transactions with neighboring utilities, power marketers and other power and natural gas risk management activities based upon the location of such activity, with margins resulting from trading and marketing activities originating in PJM and MISO generally accruing to the benefit of APCo, I&M and KPCo and trading and marketing activities originating in SPP generally accruing to the benefit of PSO and SWEPCo.  Margins resulting from other transactions are allocated among APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo based upon the common shareholder's equity of these companies.

PSO is jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on the behalf of PSO and SWEPCo related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.

Regulatory Activity

2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In January 2014, PSO filed a request with the OCC to increase annual base rates by $38 million, based upon a 10.5% return on common equity. This revenue increase includes a proposed increase in depreciation rates of $29 million. In addition, the filing proposed recovery of advanced metering costs through a separate rider over a three-year deployment period requesting $7 million of revenues in year one, increasing to $28 million in year three. The filing also proposed expansion of an existing transmission rider currently recovered in base rates to include additional transmission-related costs that are expected to increase over the next several years.

In June 2014, a non-unanimous stipulation agreement between PSO, the OCC staff and certain intervenors was filed with the OCC. The parties to the stipulation recommended no overall change to the transmission rider or to annual revenues, other than additional revenues through a separate rider related to advanced metering costs, and that the terms of the stipulation be effective November 2014. The advanced metering rider would provide $24 million of revenues over 14 months beginning in November 2014 and increase to $27 million in 2016. New depreciation rates are recommended for advanced metering investments and existing meters, also to be effective November 2014. Additionally, the stipulation recommends recovery of regulatory assets for 2013 storms and regulatory case expenses. In July 2014, the Attorney General joined in the stipulation agreement. In October 2014, the Administrative Law Judge

216


(ALJ) recommended approval of the stipulation agreement and interim rates were implemented in November 2014, subject to refund. In November 2014, intervenors filed exceptions to the ALJ's report. An order is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015. If the OCC were to disallow any portion of this settlement agreement, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case” section of PSO Rate Matters in Note 4 .

Litigation and Environmental Issues

In the ordinary course of business, PSO is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases which have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on regulatory proceedings and pending litigation, see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

See the “Executive Overview” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” section beginning on page 406 for additional discussion of relevant factors.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KWh Sales/Degree Days
Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of KWhs)
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
6,321

 
6,290

 
6,393

Commercial
5,139

 
5,066

 
5,178

Industrial
5,237

 
5,083

 
5,066

Miscellaneous
1,250

 
1,243

 
1,326

Total Retail
17,947

 
17,682

 
17,963

 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale
405

 
1,091

 
1,492

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
18,352

 
18,773

 
19,455


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in degree days)
Actual  Heating (a)
2,113

 
2,107

 
1,271

Normal  Heating (b)
1,777

 
1,763

 
1,803

 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual  Cooling (c)
2,054

 
2,082

 
2,663

Normal  Cooling (b)
2,130

 
2,133

 
2,119


(a)
Western Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.

217


2014 Compared to 2013

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Net Income
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
98

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins (a)
 
14

Off-system Sales
 
1

Other Revenues
 
(2
)
Total Change in Gross Margin
 
13

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(38
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(5
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
8

Other Income
 
(2
)
Interest Expense
 
(2
)
Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(39
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
15

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
87


(a)
Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.

The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:

Retail Margins increased $14 million primarily due to the following:
A $12 million increase primarily due to revenue increases from rate riders. This increase in retail margins has corresponding increases to riders/trackers recognized in other expense items below.
A $2 million net increase in weather-related usage primarily due to a 14% increase in heating degree days, partially offset by a 12% decrease in cooling degree days.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $38 million primarily due to the following:
An $18 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to increased SPP transmission services.
A $9 million increase in energy efficiency program expenses.                    
An $8 million increase in generation plant expenses.            
A $6 million increase in general and administrative expenses.                
These increases were partially offset by:
A $5 million decrease in distribution expenses primarily related to amortization of the 2007 and 2010 storm deferrals which were fully recovered in 2013.                
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $5 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $8 million primarily due to a 2014 property tax reduction resulting from a change in Oklahoma tax law.
Income Tax Expense decreased $15 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income and by the recording of federal income tax adjustments.


218


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets and pension and other postretirement benefits.

See the “Accounting Pronouncements” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406  for a discussion of accounting pronouncements.

219


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Public Service Company of Oklahoma:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in common shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Public Service Company of Oklahoma as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of A merica.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


220


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  PSO’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of PSO’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, PSO’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

This annual report does not include an attestation report of PSO’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit PSO to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


221



PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution
 
$
1,340,307

 
$
1,277,711

 
$
1,206,583

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 
7,054

 
14,246

 
22,603

Other Revenues
 
4,215

 
3,565

 
3,752

TOTAL REVENUES
 
1,351,576

 
1,295,522

 
1,232,938

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 
257,996

 
327,829

 
310,296

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
385,029

 
246,109

 
208,676

Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates
 
11,024

 
36,891

 
24,378

Other Operation
 
262,804

 
225,500

 
213,195

Maintenance
 
107,952

 
107,076

 
106,835

Depreciation and Amortization
 
100,977

 
95,667

 
95,180

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
36,962

 
45,215

 
43,428

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
1,162,744

 
1,084,287

 
1,001,988

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
188,832

 
211,235

 
230,950

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Income
 
249

 
1,096

 
1,308

Carrying Costs Income
 

 
338

 
1,856

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
3,071

 
4,187

 
2,007

Interest Expense
 
(54,641
)
 
(53,175
)
 
(55,286
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
 
137,511

 
163,681

 
180,835

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
50,582

 
65,885

 
66,694

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
$
86,929

 
$
97,796

 
$
114,141

The common stock of PSO is wholly-owned by AEP.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .
 
 


222


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
 (in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
86,929

 
$
97,796

 
$
114,141

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $439, $389 and $360 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(815
)
 
(723
)
 
(668
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
$
86,114

 
$
97,073

 
$
113,473

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .
 
 


223


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
157,230

 
$
364,037

 
$
364,389

 
$
7,149

 
$
892,805

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(90,000
)
 
 
 
(90,000
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
114,141

 
 
 
114,141

Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(668
)
 
(668
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
157,230

 
364,037

 
388,530

 
6,481

 
916,278

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(71,250
)
 
 
 
(71,250
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
97,796

 
 
 
97,796

Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(723
)
 
(723
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
157,230

 
364,037

 
415,076

 
5,758

 
942,101

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
 
 
 
86,929

 
 
 
86,929

Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(815
)
 
(815
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
$
157,230

 
$
364,037

 
$
502,005

 
$
4,943

 
$
1,028,215

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .
 
 


224


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
1,352

 
$
1,277

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
28,448

 
32,314

Affiliated Companies
 
22,114

 
30,392

Miscellaneous
 
6,026

 
3,102

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(147
)
 
(462
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
56,441

 
65,346

Fuel
 
16,436

 
15,191

Materials and Supplies
 
50,880

 
52,707

Risk Management Assets
 

 
1,167

Deferred Income Tax Benefits
 

 
7,333

Accrued Tax Benefits
 
24,369

 
21,665

Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs
 
35,699

 
3,298

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
6,524

 
6,194

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
191,701

 
174,178

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
1,264,724

 
1,203,221

Transmission
 
788,911

 
731,312

Distribution
 
2,080,221

 
1,986,032

Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Plant to be Retired)
 
421,568

 
393,026

Construction Work in Progress
 
204,753

 
175,890

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
4,760,177

 
4,489,481

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
 
1,319,554

 
1,323,522

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
 
3,440,623

 
3,165,959

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
154,327

 
156,690

Employee Benefits and Pension Assets
 
19,335

 
22,629

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
7,557

 
7,238

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
181,219

 
186,557

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
3,813,543

 
$
3,526,694

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .
 
 


225


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Advances from Affiliates
 
$
154,249

 
$
36,772

Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
92,672

 
150,184

Affiliated Companies
 
51,744

 
45,427

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
 
427

 
34,115

Risk Management Liabilities
 
918

 
85

Customer Deposits
 
48,700

 
45,379

Accrued Taxes
 
20,887

 
23,442

Accrued Interest
 
12,699

 
12,646

Other Current Liabilities
 
58,878

 
58,992

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
441,174

 
407,042

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
1,040,609

 
965,695

Deferred Income Taxes
 
898,352

 
836,556

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
334,479

 
327,673

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
37,030

 
22,928

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
 
20,095

 
10,561

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
13,589

 
14,138

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
2,344,154

 
2,177,551

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
2,785,328

 
2,584,593

 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – Par Value – $15 Per Share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized – 11,000,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Issued – 10,482,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Outstanding – 9,013,000 Shares
 
157,230

 
157,230

Paid-in Capital
 
364,037

 
364,037

Retained Earnings
 
502,005

 
415,076

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
4,943

 
5,758

TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
1,028,215

 
942,101

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
 
$
3,813,543

 
$
3,526,694

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .


226


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
86,929

 
$
97,796

 
$
114,141

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
100,977

 
95,667

 
95,180

Deferred Income Taxes
 
74,756

 
53,788

 
48,916

Carrying Costs Income
 

 
(338
)
 
(1,856
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(3,071
)
 
(4,187
)
 
(2,007
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
1,916

 
(6,362
)
 
3,740

Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust
 
(4,439
)
 

 
(12,306
)
Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
(32,401
)
 
(12,643
)
 
12,258

Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
(5,228
)
 
(16,435
)
 
7,436

Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
(4,545
)
 
(15,271
)
 
4,762

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
8,905

 
(4,376
)
 
4,422

Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
582

 
6,370

 
(3,067
)
Accounts Payable
 
(26,336
)
 
37,248

 
3,158

Accrued Taxes, Net
 
(5,562
)
 
332

 
5,006

Other Current Assets
 
(843
)
 
1,450

 
(970
)
Other Current Liabilities
 
17,830

 
5,877

 
5,538

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
209,470

 
238,916

 
284,351

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(367,490
)
 
(259,449
)
 
(224,295
)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 

 
10,558

 
29,318

Other Investing Activities
 
2,784

 
(2,059
)
 
1,723

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(364,706
)
 
(250,950
)
 
(193,254
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
74,973

 
49,709

 
2,395

Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 
117,477

 
36,772

 

Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
(34,115
)
 
(402
)
 
(229
)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(3,653
)
 
(3,498
)
 
(3,481
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 

 
(71,250
)
 
(90,000
)
Other Financing Activities
 
629

 
613

 
172

Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities
 
155,311

 
11,944

 
(91,143
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
75

 
(90
)
 
(46
)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
1,277

 
1,367

 
1,413

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
1,352

 
$
1,277

 
$
1,367

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
52,766

 
$
51,387

 
$
52,403

Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes
 
(21,150
)
 
8,671

 
27,229

Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
2,262

 
5,795

 
1,542

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
38,581

 
63,648

 
27,118

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .
 
 


227


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES
The notes to PSO's financial statements are combined with the notes to financial statements for other registrant subsidiaries. Listed below are the notes that apply to PSO.  The footnotes begin on page 244 .
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Related Party Transactions
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information


228


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED


229


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Company Overview

As a public utility, SWEPCo engages in the generation and purchase of electric power, and the subsequent sale, transmission and distribution of that power to approximately 528,000 retail customers in its service territory in northeastern and panhandle of Texas, northwestern Louisiana and western Arkansas.  SWEPCo consolidates its wholly-owned subsidiary, Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corporation.  SWEPCo also consolidates Sabine Mining Company, a variable interest entity.  SWEPCo sells electric power at wholesale to other utilities, municipalities and electric cooperatives. SWEPCo shares off-system sales margins with its customers.

In March 2014, SPP changed from an energy imbalance service market to a fully integrated power market. Previously, PSO and SWEPCo satisfied their load requirements with their own generation resources or through the Operating Agreement. In the new integrated power market, PSO and SWEPCo operate as standalone entities and offer their respective generation into the SPP power market. SPP then economically dispatches the resources.

AEPSC conducts power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other risk management activities on SWEPCo’s behalf.  SWEPCo shares in the revenues and expenses associated with these risk management activities, as described in the preceding paragraph, with PSO.  Power and natural gas risk management activities are allocated based on the Operating Agreement.  Risk management activities primarily include power and natural gas and physical transactions, financially-settled swaps and exchange-traded futures.  AEPSC settles the majority of the physical forward contracts by entering into offsetting contracts.

Under the SIA, AEPSC allocates physical and financial revenues and expenses from transactions with neighboring utilities, power marketers and other power and natural gas risk management activities based upon the location of such activity, with margins resulting from trading and marketing activities originating in PJM and MISO generally accruing to the benefit of APCo, I&M and KPCo and trading and marketing activities originating in SPP generally accruing to the benefit of PSO and SWEPCo.  Margins resulting from other transactions are allocated among APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo based upon the common shareholder's equity of these companies.

SWEPCo is jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on the behalf of PSO and SWEPCo related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.

Regulatory Activity

2012 Texas Base Rate Case

Upon rehearing in January 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, SWEPCo reversed $114 million of previously recorded regulatory disallowances.  The resulting annual base rate increase is approximately $52 million.  In May 2014, intervenors filed appeals of the order with the Texas District Court.  In June 2014, SWEPCo intervened in those appeals and filed initial responses.  If certain parts of the PUCT order are overturned it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See the “2012 Texas Base Rate Case” section of SWEPCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .


230


2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In 2012, SWEPCo initiated a proceeding to establish new formula base rates in Louisiana, including recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant. In February 2013, a settlement was approved by the LPSC that increased Louisiana total rates by approximately $2 million annually, effective March 2013. The March 2013 base rates are based upon a 10% return on common equity and cost recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant and Stall Unit, subject to refund. The settlement also provided that the LPSC will review base rates in 2014 and 2015 and that SWEPCo will recover non-fuel Turk Plant costs and a full weighted-average cost of capital return on the prudently incurred Turk Plant investment in jurisdictional rate base, effective January 2013. In December 2014, the LPSC approved a settlement agreement related to the staff review of the cost of service. The settlement agreement reduced the requested revenue increase by $3 million, primarily due to the timing of both the allowed recovery of certain existing regulatory assets and the establishment of a regulatory asset for certain previously expensed costs. See the “2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing” section of SWEPCo Rate Matters in Note 4 .

2014 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In April 2014, SWEPCo filed its annual formula rate plan for test year 2013 with the LPSC.  The filing included a $5 million annual increase, which was effective August 2014.  SWEPCo also proposed to increase rates by an additional $15 million annually, effective January 2015, for a total annual increase of $20 million. This additional increase reflects the cost of incremental generation to be used to serve Louisiana customers in 2015 due to the expiration of a purchase power agreement attributable to Louisiana customers.  In December 2014, the LPSC approved a partial settlement agreement that included the implementation of the $15 million annual increase in rates effective January 2015. These increases are subject to LPSC staff review and are subject to refund.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 - Environmental Projects

To comply with pending Federal EPA regulations, SWEPCo is currently constructing environmental control projects to meet mercury and air toxics standards for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 at a cost of approximately $410 million, excluding AFUDC.  Management currently estimates that the total environmental projects to be completed through 2020 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 will cost approximately $600 million, excluding AFUDC.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has incurred costs of $164 million and has remaining contractual construction obligations of $108 million related to these projects.  SWEPCo will seek recovery of these project costs from customers through filings at the state commissions and the FERC. See "Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy" section of “Environmental Issues” within “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries”.  As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $388 million, before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. 

Merchant Portion of Turk Plant

SWEPCo constructed the Turk Plant, a new base load 600 MW pulverized coal ultra-supercritical generating unit in Arkansas, which was placed into service in December 2012. SWEPCo owns 73% (440 MW) of the Turk Plant and operates the facility.

The APSC granted approval for SWEPCo to build the Turk Plant by issuing a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need (CECPN) for the SWEPCo Arkansas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant (approximately 20%). Following an appeal by certain intervenors, the Arkansas Supreme Court issued a decision that reversed the APSC’s grant of the CECPN. In June 2010, in response to an Arkansas Supreme Court decision, the APSC issued an order which reversed and set aside the previously granted CECPN. This Turk Plant output is currently not subject to cost-based rate recovery and is being sold into the wholesale market. Approximately 80% of the Turk plant is recovered under cost-based rate recovery in Texas, Louisiana, and though SWEPCo’s wholesale customers.

If SWEPCo cannot ultimately recover its investment and expenses related to the Turk Plant, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

231


Litigation and Environmental Issues

In the ordinary course of business, SWEPCo is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation.  Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty.  Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases which have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on regulatory proceedings and pending litigation, see Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 6 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.  Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

See the “Executive Overview” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” section beginning on page 406 for additional discussion of relevant factors.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KWh Sales/Degree Days
Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions of KWhs)
Retail:
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
6,311

 
6,431

 
6,301

Commercial
5,997

 
6,011

 
6,103

Industrial
5,901

 
5,612

 
5,661

Miscellaneous
80

 
81

 
81

Total Retail
18,289

 
18,135

 
18,146

 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholesale
9,411

 
9,018

 
7,762

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total KWhs
27,700

 
27,153

 
25,908


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on net income.
Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in degree days)
Actual  Heating (a)
1,553

 
1,421

 
860

Normal  Heating (b)
1,230

 
1,226

 
1,259

 
 
 
 
 
 
Actual  Cooling (c)
2,043

 
2,248

 
2,605

Normal  Cooling (b)
2,279

 
2,275

 
2,256


(a)
Western Region heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)
Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)
Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.


232


2014 Compared to 2013

Reconciliation of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Earnings Attributable to SWEPCo Common Shareholder
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
150

 
 
 
Changes in Gross Margin:
 
 
Retail Margins (a)
 
22

Off-system Sales
 
10

Transmission Revenues
 
(5
)
Other Revenues
 
3

Total Change in Gross Margin
 
30

 
 
 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
 
 
Other Operation and Maintenance
 
(42
)
Depreciation and Amortization
 
(6
)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
(4
)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
5

Interest Expense
 
4

Total Change in Expenses and Other
 
(43
)
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
3

 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
140


(a)
Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.

The major components of the increase in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:

Retail Margins increased $22 million primarily due to the following:
A $22 million increase in municipal and cooperative revenues due to formula rate adjustments.
An $11 million net increase due to the Louisiana and Texas rate orders related to the Turk Plant.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $10 million net decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 9% decrease in cooling degree days, partially offset by an increase in heating degree days.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $10 million primarily due to increased market prices and higher physical sales margins.
Transmission Revenues decreased $5 million primarily due to lower SPP margins.

Expenses and Other changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $42 million primarily due to the following:
A $15 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to increased SPP transmission services.
An $11 million increase in generation plant expenses.
An $8 million increase in general and administrative expenses.
A $4 million increase in distribution expenses primarily due to overhead line maintenance expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $6 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $4 million primarily due to higher property taxes.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction increased $5 million primarily due to increased environmental and transmission projects.
Interest Expense decreased $4 million primarily due to an increase in the debt component of AFUDC due to increased environmental and transmission projects.

233


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets and pension and other postretirement benefits.

See the “Accounting Pronouncements” section of “Combined Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Registrant Subsidiaries” beginning on page 406  for a discussion of accounting pronouncements.

234


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Southwestern Electric Power Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Am erica.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


235


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated (SWEPCo) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  SWEPCo’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of SWEPCo’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on management’s assessment, SWEPCo’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 .

This annual report does not include an attestation report of SWEPCo’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit SWEPCo to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

236



SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
REVENUES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution
 
$
1,817,863

 
$
1,742,575

 
$
1,538,533

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 
26,278

 
51,812

 
37,441

Other Revenues
 
2,256

 
1,416

 
1,860

TOTAL REVENUES
 
1,846,397

 
1,795,803

 
1,577,834

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation
 
650,437

 
630,503

 
579,721

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
178,105

 
169,954

 
131,706

Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates
 
3,766

 
11,172

 
19,229

Other Operation
 
272,785

 
250,676

 
230,078

Maintenance
 
149,243

 
129,742

 
117,415

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 

 
13,000

Depreciation and Amortization
 
185,134

 
179,251

 
138,778

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
 
84,285

 
80,662

 
72,011

TOTAL EXPENSES
 
1,523,755

 
1,451,960

 
1,301,938

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME
 
322,642

 
343,843

 
275,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Income
 
299

 
58

 
1,230

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
11,947

 
7,338

 
57,054

Interest Expense
 
(126,127
)
 
(130,282
)
 
(88,318
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY EARNINGS
 
208,761

 
220,957

 
245,862

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Tax Expense
 
66,420

 
69,461

 
45,858

Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiary
 
2,218

 
2,323

 
2,509

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME
 
144,559

 
153,819

 
202,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
 
4,190

 
4,008

 
3,622

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER
 
$
140,369

 
$
149,811

 
$
198,891

The common stock of SWEPCo is wholly-owned by AEP.
 
See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

237


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
 (in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Net Income
 
$
144,559

 
$
153,819

 
$
202,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $1,186, $1,244 and $13 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
2,202

 
2,311

 
(25
)
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $506, $137 and $358 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(939
)
 
(255
)
 
665

Pension and OPEB Funded Status, Net of Tax of $153, $3,963 and $4,477 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, Respectively
 
(285
)
 
7,360

 
8,315

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
978

 
9,416

 
8,955

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
145,537

 
163,235

 
211,468

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
 
4,190

 
4,008

 
3,622

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER
 
$
141,347

 
$
159,227

 
$
207,846

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

238


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
SWEPCo Common Shareholder
 
 
 
 
 
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
 
Total
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2011
$
135,660

 
$
674,606

 
$
1,029,915

 
$
(26,815
)
 
$
391

 
$
1,813,757

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,752
)
 
(3,752
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
198,891

 
 
 
3,622

 
202,513

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
8,955

 
 
 
8,955

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2012
135,660

 
674,606

 
1,228,806

 
(17,860
)
 
261

 
2,021,473

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(125,000
)
 
 
 
 
 
(125,000
)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,791
)
 
(3,791
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
149,811

 
 
 
4,008

 
153,819

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,416

 
 
 
9,416

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2013
135,660

 
674,606

 
1,253,617

 
(8,444
)
 
478

 
2,055,917

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
(100,000
)
 
 
 
 
 
(100,000
)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,253
)
 
(4,253
)
Net Income
 
 
 
 
140,369

 
 
 
4,190

 
144,559

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
978

 
 
 
978

TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2014
$
135,660

 
$
674,606

 
$
1,293,986

 
$
(7,466
)
 
$
415

 
$
2,097,201

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

239


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $12,695 and $15,827, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 
$
14,356

 
$
17,241

Advances to Affiliates
 
41,033

 

Accounts Receivable:
 
 
 
 
Customers
 
46,738

 
86,263

Affiliated Companies
 
37,114

 
22,389

Miscellaneous
 
25,625

 
27,175

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
 
(516
)
 
(1,418
)
Total Accounts Receivable
 
108,961

 
134,409

Fuel
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $38,920 and $37,518, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 
116,955

 
122,026

Materials and Supplies
 
73,666

 
74,862

Risk Management Assets
 
31

 
1,179

Deferred Income Tax Benefits
 
9,041

 
177,297

Accrued Tax Benefits
 
15,408

 
158

Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs
 
24,024

 
17,949

Prepayments and Other Current Assets
 
25,779

 
20,931

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
 
429,254

 
566,052

 
 
 
 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
 
 
 
Electric:
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
3,864,543

 
3,764,429

Transmission
 
1,300,729

 
1,165,167

Distribution
 
1,894,572

 
1,843,912

Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Plant to be Retired)
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $288,183 and $291,556, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 
878,753

 
869,230

Construction Work in Progress
 
471,980

 
281,849

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
8,410,577

 
7,924,587

Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
(December 31, 2014 and 2013 Amounts Include $142,983 and $134,282, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 
2,503,290

 
2,391,652

TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
 
5,907,287

 
5,532,935

 
 
 
 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
393,602

 
369,905

Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
 
86,750

 
92,890

TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
 
480,352

 
462,795

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
6,816,893

 
$
6,561,782

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

240


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Advances from Affiliates
 
$

 
$
9,180

Accounts Payable:
 
 
 
 
General
 
175,109

 
152,653

Affiliated Companies
 
67,410

 
56,923

Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
 
306,750

 
3,250

Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,082

 

Customer Deposits
 
59,903

 
56,375

Accrued Taxes
 
43,965

 
41,508

Accrued Interest
 
44,328

 
43,996

Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
17,557

 
17,899

Regulatory Liability for Over-Recovered Fuel Costs
 

 
7,275

Other Current Liabilities
 
104,553

 
79,622

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
820,657

 
468,681

 
 
 
 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
1,833,687

 
2,040,082

Deferred Income Taxes
 
1,351,111

 
1,271,478

Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
458,530

 
472,128

Asset Retirement Obligations
 
92,015

 
87,630

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
 
25,374

 
14,602

Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
91,044

 
105,086

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
47,274

 
46,178

TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
 
3,899,035

 
4,037,184

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
4,719,692

 
4,505,865

 
 
 
 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Common Stock – Par Value – $18 Per Share:
 
 
 
 
Authorized –  7,600,000 Shares
 
 
 
 
Outstanding  – 7,536,640 Shares
 
135,660

 
135,660

Paid-in Capital
 
674,606

 
674,606

Retained Earnings
 
1,293,986

 
1,253,617

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
(7,466
)
 
(8,444
)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
2,096,786

 
2,055,439

 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling Interest
 
415

 
478

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL EQUITY
 
2,097,201

 
2,055,917

 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
$
6,816,893

 
$
6,561,782

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

241


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012
(in thousands)
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
144,559

 
$
153,819

 
$
202,513

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
185,134

 
179,251

 
138,778

Deferred Income Taxes
 
239,426

 
81,888

 
260,761

Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges
 

 

 
13,000

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction
 
(11,947
)
 
(7,338
)
 
(57,054
)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts
 
2,133

 
(1,539
)
 
(4,159
)
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust
 
(3,832
)
 

 
(13,192
)
Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net
 
(13,350
)
 
(18,916
)
 
14,045

Change in Regulatory Liabilities
 
(24,559
)
 
(12,806
)
 
37,955

Change in Other Noncurrent Assets
 
(2,080
)
 
34,559

 
21,309

Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
23,590

 
(634
)
 
14,594

Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable, Net
 
25,448

 
(35,472
)
 
(21,919
)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies
 
6,267

 
6,558

 
(46,106
)
Accounts Payable
 
4,359

 
12,816

 
3,813

Accrued Taxes, Net
 
(12,802
)
 
25,341

 
(16,057
)
Other Current Assets
 
(4,356
)
 
(1,398
)
 
(387
)
Other Current Liabilities
 
21,193

 
1,634

 
(3,611
)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
579,183

 
417,763

 
544,283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Expenditures
 
(511,388
)
 
(411,512
)
 
(542,427
)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net
 
(41,033
)
 
153,829

 
(153,829
)
Other Investing Activities
 
5,080

 
(2,074
)
 
1,605

Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities
 
(547,341
)
 
(259,757
)
 
(694,651
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
99,415

 

 
336,418

Credit Facility Borrowings
 

 
17,091

 
25,123

Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net
 
(9,180
)
 
9,180

 
(132,473
)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
 
(3,250
)
 
(3,250
)
 
(21,625
)
Credit Facility Repayments
 

 
(19,694
)
 
(39,536
)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations
 
(18,318
)
 
(18,111
)
 
(16,537
)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock
 
(100,000
)
 
(125,000
)
 

Dividends Paid on Common Stock – Nonaffiliated
 
(4,253
)
 
(3,791
)
 
(3,752
)
Other Financing Activities
 
859

 
774

 
3,985

Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities
 
(34,727
)
 
(142,801
)
 
151,603

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
(2,885
)
 
15,205

 
1,235

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
 
17,241

 
2,036

 
801

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 
$
14,356

 
$
17,241

 
$
2,036

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts
 
$
116,855

 
$
120,427

 
$
68,918

Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes
 
(152,213
)
 
(35,363
)
 
(191,638
)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases
 
4,130

 
9,376

 
20,547

Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of December 31,
 
94,263

 
63,169

 
55,767

See Notes to Financial Statements of Registrant Subsidiaries beginning on page 244 .

242


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES
The notes to SWEPCo’s financial statements are combined with the notes to financial statements for other registrant subsidiaries. Listed below are the notes that apply to SWEPCo.  The footnotes begin on page 244 .
 
Page
Number
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
Rate Matters
Effects of Regulation
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Disposition and Impairments
Benefit Plans
Business Segments
Derivatives and Hedging
Fair Value Measurements
Income Taxes
Leases
Financing Activities
Related Party Transactions
Variable Interest Entities
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost Reduction Programs
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information


243


INDEX OF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES

The notes to financial statements that follow are a combined presentation for the Registrant Subsidiaries.  The following list indicates the registrants to which the footnotes apply:
 
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
New Accounting Pronouncements
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Comprehensive Income
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Rate Matters
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Effects of Regulation
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Disposition and Impairments
APCo, OPCo, SWEPCo
Benefit Plans
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Business Segments
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Derivatives and Hedging
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Fair Value Measurements
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Income Taxes
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Leases
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Financing Activities
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Related Party Transactions
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Variable Interest Entities
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Property, Plant and Equipment
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Cost Reduction Programs
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information
APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo

 

244


1.   ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION

The principal business conducted by the Registrant Subsidiaries is the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power.  These companies are subject to regulation by the FERC under the Federal Power Act and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and maintain accounts in accordance with the FERC and other regulatory guidelines.  These companies are subject to further regulation with regard to rates and other matters by state regulatory commissions.

The Registrant Subsidiaries also engage in wholesale electricity marketing and risk management activities in the United States.  I&M provides barging services to both affiliated and nonaffiliated companies.  SWEPCo, through consolidated and nonconsolidated affiliates, conducts lignite mining operations to fuel certain of its generation facilities.

Corporate Separation

Background

On December 31, 2013, as approved by the FERC and the PUCO, OPCo transferred its generation assets and related generation liabilities at net book value to AGR.  In accordance with Ohio law, OPCo remains responsible to provide power and capacity to OPCo customers who have not switched electric providers.  Effective January 1, 2014, OPCo began purchasing power from both affiliated and nonaffiliated entities, subject to PUCO approval, to meet the energy and capacity needs of customers. In April 2013, and in connection with corporate separation of OPCo’s generation assets and liabilities, OPCo sold the majority of its assets related to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Conesville Coal Preparation Company (CCPC).  Also in connection with corporate separation, OPCo transferred its ownership of Cook Coal Terminal to AEGCo in August 2013. On December 31, 2013, subsequent to the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets and associated liabilities to AGR, AGR transferred at net book value its ownership (867 MW) in Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo.  

Significant Accounting Issues

Shown below are the carrying amounts of OPCo generation assets, liabilities and equity that were distributed to AGR on December 31, 2013:
 
 
December 31, 2013
ASSETS
 
(in thousands)
Current Assets
 
$
777,677

Net Property, Plant and Equipment
 
5,685,415

Other Noncurrent Assets
 
259,801

Total Assets
 
$
6,722,893

 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
Long-term Debt
 
$
1,411,825

Other Current Liabilities
 
633,505

Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 
1,672,189

Equity
 
3,005,374

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
6,722,893


As noted above, APCo’s acquisition of the two-thirds ownership in Amos Plant, Unit 3 qualifies as an acquisition of a business under common control, which is typically accounted for as if the transfer had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented, pursuant to accounting guidance for “Business Combinations.”  However, management determined the retrospective application of this transfer to be quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial when taken as a whole in relation to APCo’s financial statements.  As a result, APCo’s financial statements were not retrospectively adjusted to reflect the transfer.

245


All regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities related to OPCo’s generation activities remained on OPCo’s balance sheet subsequent to OPCo’s transfer of generation assets and associated liabilities to AGR.  As previously approved by the PUCO, these regulatory assets and liabilities will be recovered/refunded primarily through OPCo non-bypassable riders.

Substantially all of the current income tax receivables and payables related to OPCo’s generation activities prior to December 31, 2013 remained on OPCo’s balance sheet.  These current income tax receivables and payables are the responsibility of OPCo.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities related to APCo’s acquired share of Amos Plant, Unit 3 and KPCo’s acquired share of the Mitchell Plant were transferred to APCo and KPCo, respectively, based upon their respective plant-related asset and liability values.  Following these transfers, APCo and KPCo adjusted their deferred tax balances and related regulatory assets to reflect their respective deferred state tax rates.

Long-term Debt

In the fourth quarter of 2013, OPCo:

Drew down an additional $400 million of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated on an existing $1 billion term credit facility and subsequently assigned $1 billion of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated that was drawn down on this term credit facility to AGR.
Received $297 million of Notes Receivable – Affiliated from AGR with terms and conditions similar to OPCo Pollution Control Bonds.
Retired $200 million of Long-term Debt – Affiliated in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Assigned $115 million of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated to AGR related to certain OPCo Pollution Control Bonds.
Retired $50 million of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated related to OPCo Pollution Control Bonds.

On December 31, 2013, APCo:

Was assigned $300 million of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated from AGR related to a term credit facility.
Issued $86 million in Long-term Debt – Affiliated to AGR.

Other Impacts of Corporate Separation

The Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection agreement was also terminated.
 
Effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved:

A PCA among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.  Under the PCA, APCo, I&M and KPCo are individually responsible for planning their respective capacity obligations and there are no capacity equalization charges/credits under the PCA on deficit/surplus companies.   Further, the PCA allows, but does not obligate, APCo, I&M and KPCo to participate collectively under a common fixed resource requirement capacity plan in PJM and to participate in specified collective off-system sales and purchase activities.
A Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as agent.  The Bridge Agreement is an interim arrangement to: (a) address the treatment of purchases and sales made by AEPSC on behalf of member companies that extend beyond termination of the Interconnection Agreement and (b) address how member companies will fulfill their existing obligations under the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement through the 2014/2015 PJM planning year.  Under the Bridge Agreement, AGR is committed to use its capacity to help meet the PJM capacity obligations of member companies through May 31, 2015.

246


A Power Supply Agreement (PSA) between AGR and OPCo for AGR to supply capacity for OPCo’s switched (at $188.88 /MW day) and non-switched retail load for the period January 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015 and to supply the energy needs of OPCo’s non-switched retail load that was not acquired through auctions in 2014.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Rates and Service Regulation

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ rates are regulated by the FERC and state regulatory commissions in the nine state operating territories in which they operate.  The FERC also regulates the Registrant Subsidiaries’ affiliated transactions, including AEPSC intercompany service billings which are generally at cost, under the 2005 Public Utility Holding Company Act and the Federal Power Act.  The FERC also has jurisdiction over the issuances and acquisitions of securities of the public utility subsidiaries, the acquisition or sale of certain utility assets and mergers with another electric utility or holding company.  For non-power goods and services, the FERC requires a nonregulated affiliate to bill an affiliated public utility company at no more than market while a public utility must bill the higher of cost or market to a nonregulated affiliate.  The state regulatory commissions also regulate certain intercompany transactions under various orders and affiliate statutes.  Both the FERC and state regulatory commissions are permitted to review and audit the relevant books and records of companies within a public utility holding company system.

The FERC regulates wholesale power markets and wholesale power transactions.  The Registrant Subsidiaries’ wholesale power transactions are generally market-based.  Wholesale power transactions are cost-based regulated when the Registrant Subsidiaries negotiate and file a cost-based contract with the FERC or the FERC determines that the Registrant Subsidiaries have “market power” in the region where the transaction occurs.  The Registrant Subsidiaries have entered into wholesale power supply contracts with various municipalities and cooperatives that are FERC-regulated, cost-based contracts.  These contracts are generally formula rate mechanisms, which are trued up to actual costs annually.  

The state regulatory commissions regulate all of the retail distribution operations and rates of the Registrant Subsidiaries on a cost basis.  The state regulatory commissions also regulate the retail generation/power supply operations and rates except in Ohio.  The ESP rates in Ohio continue the process of transitioning generation/power supply rates over time to market rates.

The FERC also regulates the Registrant Subsidiaries’ wholesale transmission operations and rates.  The FERC claims jurisdiction over retail transmission rates when retail rates are unbundled in connection with restructuring.  OPCo’s retail transmission rates in Ohio, APCo’s retail transmission rates in Virginia and I&M’s retail transmission rates in Michigan are unbundled and are based on formula rates included in the PJM OATT that are cost-based.  Bundled retail transmission rates are regulated, on a cost basis, by the state commissions.

In addition, the FERC regulates the SIA, the Operating Agreement, the Transmission Agreement and the Transmission Coordination Agreement, all of which are still active and allocate shared system costs and revenues among the Registrant Subsidiaries that are parties to each agreement.  In accordance with management's October 2012 filing with the FERC, the Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection Agreement was also terminated.  In December 2013, the FERC issued orders approving the creation of a PCA, effective January 1, 2014.  Also effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved the creation of a Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent. Effective June 1, 2014, the FERC approved the cancellation of the System Transmission Integration Agreement.


247


Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for APCo include the Registrant Subsidiary, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding (a substantially-controlled VIE).  The consolidated financial statements for I&M include the Registrant Subsidiary, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and DCC Fuel (substantially-controlled VIEs).  The consolidated financial statements for OPCo include the Registrant Subsidiary and Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding (a substantially-controlled VIE).  The consolidated financial statements for SWEPCo include the Registrant Subsidiary and Sabine (a substantially-controlled VIE).  Intercompany items are eliminated in consolidation.  The Registrant Subsidiaries use the equity method of accounting for equity investments where they exercise significant influence but do not hold a controlling financial interest.  Such investments are initially recorded at cost in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheets. The proportionate share of the investee's equity earnings is included in Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries on the statements of income.  Equity method investments are required to be tested for impairment when it is determined there may be an other-than-temporary loss in value. I&M, PSO and SWEPCo have ownership interests in generating units that are jointly-owned.  The proportionate share of the operating costs associated with such facilities is included in the income statements and the assets and liabilities are reflected in the balance sheets.  See Note 16 − Variable Interest Entities and Note 17 − Property, Plant and Equipment.

Accounting for the Effects of Cost-Based Regulation

As rate-regulated electric public utility companies, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ financial statements reflect the actions of regulators that result in the recognition of certain revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.  In accordance with accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations,” the Registrant Subsidiaries record regulatory assets (deferred expenses) and regulatory liabilities (deferred revenue reductions or refunds) to reflect the economic effects of regulation in the same accounting period by matching expenses with their recovery through regulated revenues and by matching income with its passage to customers in cost-based regulated rates.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  These estimates include, but are not limited to, inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful accounts, long-lived asset impairment, unbilled electricity revenue, valuation of long-term energy contracts, the effects of regulation, long-lived asset recovery, storm costs, the effects of contingencies and certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and postretirement benefits.  The estimates and assumptions used are based upon management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the financial statements.  Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents include temporary cash investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding

Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding includes funds held by trustees primarily for the payment of securitization bonds.

Inventory

Fossil fuel inventories are carried at average cost.  Materials and supplies inventories are carried at average cost.


248


Accounts Receivable

Customer accounts receivable primarily include receivables from wholesale and retail energy customers, receivables from energy contract counterparties related to risk management activities and customer receivables primarily related to other revenue-generating activities.

Revenue is recognized from electric power sales when power is delivered to customers.  To the extent that deliveries have occurred but a bill has not been issued, the Registrant Subsidiaries accrue and recognize, as Accrued Unbilled Revenues on the balance sheets, an estimate of the revenues for energy delivered since the last billing.

AEP Credit factors accounts receivable on a daily basis, excluding receivables from risk management activities, through purchase agreements with I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and a portion of APCo.  Since APCo does not have regulatory authority to sell accounts receivable in its West Virginia regulatory jurisdiction, only a portion of APCo’s accounts receivable are sold to AEP Credit.  See “Sale of Receivables – AEP Credit” section of Note 14 for additional information.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

Generally, AEP Credit records bad debt expense related to receivables purchased from the Registrant Subsidiaries under a sale of receivables agreement.  For receivables related to APCo’s West Virginia operations, the bad debt reserve is calculated based on a rolling two-year average write-off in proportion to gross accounts receivable.  For customer accounts receivables relating to risk management activities, accounts receivables are reviewed for bad debt reserves at a specific counterparty level basis.  For miscellaneous accounts receivable, bad debt expense is recorded for all amounts outstanding 180 days or greater at 100%, unless specifically identified.  Miscellaneous accounts receivable items open less than 180 days may be reserved using specific identification for bad debt reserves.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

The Registrant Subsidiaries do not have any significant customers that comprise 10% or more of their operating revenues as of December 31, 2014 .

The Registrant Subsidiaries monitor credit levels and the financial condition of their customers on a continuing basis to minimize credit risk.  The regulatory commissions allow recovery in rates for a reasonable level of bad debt costs.  Management believes adequate provisions for credit loss have been made in the accompanying Registrant Subsidiary financial statements.

Emission Allowances

The Registrant Subsidiaries in regulated jurisdictions record emission allowances at cost, including the annual SO 2 and NO x emission allowance entitlements received at no cost from the Federal EPA.  Prior to corporate separation and the distribution of all emission allowances to AGR on December 31, 2013, OPCo recorded allowances at the lower of cost or market.  The Registrant Subsidiaries follow the inventory model for these allowances.  Allowances expected to be consumed within one year are reported in Materials and Supplies.  Allowances with expected consumption beyond one year are included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets.  These allowances are consumed in the production of energy and are recorded in Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation at an average cost.  The purchases and sales of allowances are reported in the Operating Activities section of the statements of cash flows.  The net margin on sales of emission allowances is included in Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues for nonaffiliated transactions and in Sales to AEP Affiliates for affiliated transactions because of its integral nature to the production process of energy and the Registrant Subsidiaries’ revenue optimization strategy for their operations.  The net margin on sales of emission allowances affects the determination of deferred fuel or deferred emission allowance costs and the amortization of regulatory assets for certain jurisdictions.


249


Property, Plant and Equipment

Regulated

Electric utility property, plant and equipment for rate-regulated operations are stated at original cost. Additions, major replacements and betterments are added to the plant accounts.  Under the group composite method of depreciation, continuous interim routine replacements of items such as boiler tubes, pumps, motors, etc. result in original cost retirements, less salvage, being charged to accumulated depreciation.  The group composite method of depreciation assumes that on average, asset components are retired at the end of their useful lives and thus there is no gain or loss.  The equipment in each primary electric plant account is identified as a separate group.  The depreciation rates that are established take into account the past history of interim capital replacements and the amount of removal cost incurred and salvage received.  These rates and the related lives are subject to periodic review.  Removal costs are charged to regulatory liabilities.  The costs of labor, materials and overhead incurred to operate and maintain plants are included in operating expenses.

Long-lived assets are required to be tested for impairment when it is determined that the carrying value of the assets may no longer be recoverable or when the assets meet the held-for-sale criteria under the accounting guidance for “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”  When it becomes probable that an asset in service or an asset under construction will be abandoned and regulatory cost recovery has been disallowed, the cost of that asset shall be removed from plant-in-service or CWIP and charged to expense.

The fair value of an asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, as opposed to a forced or liquidation sale.  Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available.  In the absence of quoted prices for identical or similar assets in active markets, fair value is estimated using various internal and external valuation methods including cash flow analysis and appraisals.

Nonregulated

Nonregulated operations generally follow the policies of rate-regulated operations listed above but with the following exceptions.  Property, plant and equipment of nonregulated operations are stated at fair value at acquisition (or as adjusted for any applicable impairments) plus the original cost of property acquired or constructed since the acquisition, less disposals.  Normal and routine retirements from the plant accounts, net of salvage, are charged to accumulated depreciation for most nonregulated operations under the group composite method of depreciation.  A gain or loss would be recorded if the retirement is not considered an interim routine replacement.  Removal costs are charged to expense.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalization

For regulated operations, AFUDC represents the estimated cost of borrowed and equity funds used to finance construction projects that is capitalized and recovered through depreciation over the service life of regulated electric utility plant.  The Registrant Subsidiaries record the equity component of AFUDC in Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction and the debt component of AFUDC as a reduction to Interest Expense.  For nonregulated operations, including certain generating assets, interest is capitalized during construction in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Capitalization of Interest.”

Valuation of Nonderivative Financial Instruments

The book values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Advances to/from Affiliates, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.  The book value of the pre-April 1983 spent nuclear fuel disposal liability for I&M approximates the best estimate of its fair value.


250


Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities

The accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2.  When quoted market prices are not available, pricing may be completed using comparable securities, dealer values, operating data and general market conditions to determine fair value.  Valuation models utilize various inputs such as commodity, interest rate and, to a lesser degree, volatility and credit that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, market corroborated inputs (i.e. inputs derived principally from, or correlated to, observable market data) and other observable inputs for the asset or liability.  The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations and Finance groups in accordance with established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of AEP’s Board of Directors.  The AEP System’s market risk oversight staff independently monitors risk policies, procedures and risk levels and provides members of the Commercial Operations Risk Committee (Regulated Risk Committee) various daily, weekly and/or monthly reports regarding compliance with policies, limits and procedures.  The Regulated Risk Committee consists of AEPSC’s Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Generation, Senior Vice President of Commercial Operations and Chief Risk Officer.

For commercial activities, exchange traded derivatives, namely futures contracts, are generally fair valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1.  Level 2 inputs primarily consist of OTC broker quotes in moderately active or less active markets, as well as exchange traded contracts where there is insufficient market liquidity to warrant inclusion in Level 1.  Management verifies price curves using these broker quotes and classifies these fair values within Level 2 when substantially all of the fair value can be corroborated.  Management typically obtains multiple broker quotes, which are nonbinding in nature but are based on recent trades in the marketplace.  When multiple broker quotes are obtained, the quoted bid and ask prices are averaged.  In certain circumstances, a broker quote may be discarded if it is a clear outlier.  Management uses a historical correlation analysis between the broker quoted location and the illiquid locations.  If the points are highly correlated, these locations are included within Level 2 as well.  Certain OTC and bilaterally executed derivative instruments are executed in less active markets with a lower availability of pricing information.  Illiquid transactions, complex structured transactions, FTRs and counterparty credit risk may require nonmarket based inputs.  Some of these inputs may be internally developed or extrapolated and utilized to estimate fair value.  When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized as Level 3.  The main driver of contracts being classified as Level 3 is the inability to substantiate energy price curves in the market.  A significant portion of the Level 3 instruments have been economically hedged which greatly limits potential earnings volatility.

AEP utilizes its trustee’s external pricing service to estimate the fair value of the underlying investments held in the benefit plan and nuclear trusts.  AEP’s investment managers review and validate the prices utilized by the trustee to determine fair value.  AEP’s management performs its own valuation testing to verify the fair values of the securities.  AEP receives audit reports of the trustee’s operating controls and valuation processes.  The trustee uses multiple pricing vendors for the assets held in the trusts.

Assets in the benefits and nuclear trusts, Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding and Cash and Cash Equivalents are classified using the following methods.  Equities are classified as Level 1 holdings if they are actively traded on exchanges.  Items classified as Level 1 are investments in money market funds, fixed income and equity mutual funds and domestic equity securities.  They are valued based on observable inputs, primarily unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  Items classified as Level 2 are primarily investments in individual fixed income securities and cash equivalent funds.  Fixed income securities generally do not trade on exchanges and do not have an official closing price but their valuation inputs are based on observable market data.  Pricing vendors calculate bond valuations using financial models and matrices.  The models use observable inputs including yields on benchmark securities, quotes by securities brokers, rating agency actions, discounts or premiums on securities compared to par prices, changes in yields for U.S. Treasury securities, corporate actions by bond issuers, prepayment schedules and histories, economic events and, for certain securities, adjustments to yields to reflect changes in the rate of

251


inflation.  Other securities with model-derived valuation inputs that are observable are also classified as Level 2 investments.  Investments with unobservable valuation inputs are classified as Level 3 investments.  Benefit plan assets included in Level 3 are primarily real estate and private equity investments that are valued using methods requiring judgment including appraisals. The fair value of real estate investments is measured using market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments and independent third-party appraisals. The fair value of private equity investments is measured using cost and purchase multiples, operating results, discounted future cash flows and market based comparable data. Depending on the specific situation, one or multiple approaches are used to determine the valuation of a real estate or private equity investment.

Deferred Fuel Costs

The cost of fuel and related emission allowances and emission control chemicals/consumables is charged to Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation expense when the fuel is burned or the allowance or consumable is utilized.  The cost of fuel also includes the cost of nuclear fuel burned which is computed primarily on the units-of-production method.  In regulated jurisdictions with an active FAC, fuel cost over-recoveries (the excess of fuel-related revenues over applicable fuel costs incurred) are generally deferred as current regulatory liabilities and under-recoveries (the excess of applicable fuel costs incurred over fuel-related revenues) are generally deferred as current regulatory assets.  Fuel cost over-recovery and under-recovery balances are classified as noncurrent when there is a phase-in plan or the FAC has been suspended.  These deferrals are amortized when refunded or when billed to customers in later months with the state regulatory commissions’ review and approval.  The amount of an over-recovery or under-recovery can also be affected by actions of the state regulatory commissions.  On a routine basis, state regulatory commissions review and/or audit the Registrant Subsidiaries’ fuel procurement policies and practices, the fuel cost calculations and FAC deferrals.  When a FAC under-recovery is no longer probable of recovery, the Registrant Subsidiaries adjust their FAC deferrals and record provisions for estimated refunds to recognize these probable outcomes.

Changes in fuel costs, including purchased power in Indiana and Michigan for I&M, in Ohio (through the ESP related to standard service offer load served) for OPCo, in Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas for SWEPCo, in Oklahoma for PSO and in Virginia and West Virginia (upon securitization in November 2013) for APCo are reflected in rates in a timely manner generally through the FAC.  Changes in fuel costs, including purchased power in Ohio (from 2009 through 2011) for OPCo and in West Virginia (prior to securitization in November 2013) for APCo are reflected in rates through FAC phase-in plans.  The FAC generally includes some sharing of off-system sales margins.  In West Virginia for APCo, all of the margins from off-system sales are given to customers through the FAC.  Prior to corporate separation, none of the margins from off-system sales were given to customers through the FAC in Ohio for OPCo.  A portion of margins from off-system sales are given to customers through the FAC and other rate mechanisms in Oklahoma for PSO, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas for SWEPCo, Virginia for APCo and in Indiana and Michigan for I&M.  Where the FAC or off-system sales sharing mechanism is capped, frozen or non-existent, changes in fuel costs or sharing of off-system sales impact earnings.

Revenue Recognition

Regulatory Accounting

The financial statements of the Registrant Subsidiaries reflect the actions of regulators that can result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.  Regulatory assets (deferred expenses) and regulatory liabilities (deferred revenue reductions or refunds) are recorded to reflect the economic effects of regulation in the same accounting period by matching expenses with their recovery through regulated revenues and by matching income with its passage to customers in cost-based regulated rates.

When regulatory assets are probable of recovery through regulated rates, the Registrant Subsidiaries record them as assets on the balance sheets.  The Registrant Subsidiaries test for probability of recovery at each balance sheet date or whenever new events occur.  Examples of new events include the issuance of a regulatory commission order or passage of new legislation.  If it is determined that recovery of a regulatory asset is no longer probable, the Registrant Subsidiaries write off that regulatory asset as a charge against income.

252


Electricity Supply and Delivery Activities

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize revenues from retail and wholesale electricity sales and electricity transmission and distribution delivery services.  The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize the revenues on the statements of income upon delivery of the energy to the customer and include unbilled as well as billed amounts.  In accordance with the applicable state commission regulatory treatment, PSO and SWEPCo do not record the fuel portion of unbilled revenue.

Most of the power produced at the generation plants of APCo and I&M is sold to PJM.  Most of the power produced at the generation plants of PSO and SWEPCo is sold to SPP. The Regulated Subsidiaries purchase power from PJM and SPP to supply power to their customers.  Generally, these power sales and purchases are reported on a net basis as revenues on the statements of income.  However, purchases of power in excess of sales to PJM or SPP, on an hourly net basis, used to serve retail load are recorded gross as Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.

Physical energy purchases arising from non-derivative contracts are accounted for on a gross basis in Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.  Energy purchases arising from non-trading derivative contracts are recorded based on the transaction’s facts and circumstances.  Purchases under non-trading derivatives used to serve accrual based obligations are recorded in Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.  All other non-trading derivative purchases are recorded net in revenues.

In general, the Registrant Subsidiaries record expenses when purchased electricity is received and when expenses are incurred.  APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo defer unrealized MTM amounts as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).

Energy Marketing and Risk Management Activities

AEPSC, on behalf of APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo, engages in wholesale power, coal and natural gas marketing and risk management activities focused on wholesale markets where the AEP System owns assets and adjacent markets.  These activities include the purchase-and-sale of energy under forward contracts at fixed and variable prices.  These contracts include physical transactions, exchange-traded futures, and to a lesser extent, OTC swaps and options.  Certain energy marketing and risk management transactions are with RTOs.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize revenues and expenses from wholesale marketing and risk management transactions that are not derivatives upon delivery of the commodity.  The Registrant Subsidiaries use MTM accounting for wholesale marketing and risk management transactions that are derivatives unless the derivative is designated in a qualifying cash flow hedge relationship or a normal purchase or sale.  The Registrant Subsidiaries include realized gains and losses on wholesale marketing and risk management transactions in revenues or expense based on the transaction's facts and circumstances.  For APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo, unrealized MTM amounts and some realized gains and losses are deferred as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).  Unrealized MTM gains and losses are included on the balance sheets as Risk Management Assets or Liabilities as appropriate.

Certain qualifying wholesale marketing and risk management derivatives transactions are designated as hedges of variability in future cash flows as a result of forecasted transactions (cash flow hedge).  The Registrant Subsidiaries initially record the effective portion of the cash flow hedge’s gain or loss as a component of AOCI.  When the forecasted transaction is realized and affects net income, the Registrant Subsidiaries subsequently reclassify the gain or loss on the hedge from AOCI into revenues or expenses within the same financial statement line item as the forecasted transaction on their statements of income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries defer the ineffective portion as regulatory assets (for losses) and regulatory liabilities (for gains).  See “Accounting for Cash Flow Hedging Strategies” section of Note 10 .


253


SPP Integrated Power Market

In March 2014, SPP changed from an energy imbalance service market to a fully integrated power market. In the past, PSO and SWEPCo would satisfy their load requirements with their own generation resources or through the Operating Agreement. In the new integrated power market, PSO and SWEPCo operate as standalone entities by offering their respective generation into the SPP power market, which then economically dispatches the resources. This change further enables retail customers to obtain power through either internal generation or power purchases from the SPP market. The new integrated power market now operates in a similar manner as the PJM power market for the AEP East Companies. The change in the SPP integrated power market did not have a significant effect on the 2014 results of operations or cash flows.

Levelization of Nuclear Refueling Outage Costs

In accordance with regulatory orders, I&M defers incremental operation and maintenance costs associated with periodic refueling outages at its Cook Plant and amortizes the costs over the period beginning with the month following the start of each unit’s refueling outage and lasting until the end of the month in which the same unit’s next scheduled refueling outage begins.  I&M adjusts the amortization amount as necessary to ensure full amortization of all deferred costs by the end of the refueling cycle.

Maintenance

The Registrant Subsidiaries expense maintenance costs as incurred.  If it becomes probable that the Registrant Subsidiaries will recover specifically-incurred costs through future rates, a regulatory asset is established to match the expensing of those maintenance costs with their recovery in cost-based regulated revenues.  In certain regulatory jurisdictions, the Registrant Subsidiaries defer costs above the level included in base rates and amortize those deferrals commensurate with recovery through rate riders.

Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits

The Registrant Subsidiaries use the liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are provided for all temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities which will result in a future tax consequence.

When the flow-through method of accounting for temporary differences is reflected in regulated revenues (that is, when deferred taxes are not included in the cost of service for determining regulated rates for electricity), deferred income taxes are recorded and related regulatory assets and liabilities are established to match the regulated revenues and tax expense.

Investment tax credits are accounted for under the flow-through method except where regulatory commissions have reflected investment tax credits in the rate-making process on a deferral basis.  Investment tax credits that have been deferred are amortized over the life of the plant investment.

The Registrant Subsidiaries account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Income Taxes.”  The Registrant Subsidiaries classify interest expense or income related to uncertain tax positions as interest expense or income as appropriate and classify penalties as Other Operation expense.

Excise Taxes

As agents for some state and local governments, the Registrant Subsidiaries collect from customers certain excise taxes levied by those state or local governments on customers.  The Registrant Subsidiaries do not record these taxes as revenue or expense.


254


Debt

Gains and losses from the reacquisition of debt used to finance regulated electric utility plants are deferred and amortized over the remaining term of the reacquired debt in accordance with their rate-making treatment unless the debt is refinanced.  If the reacquired debt associated with the regulated business is refinanced, the reacquisition costs attributable to the portions of the business that are subject to cost-based regulatory accounting are generally deferred and amortized over the term of the replacement debt consistent with its recovery in rates.  Operations not subject to cost-based rate regulation report gains and losses on the reacquisition of debt in Interest Expense on the statements of income upon reacquisition.

Debt discount or premium and debt issuance expenses are deferred and amortized generally utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related debt.  The straight-line method approximates the effective interest method and is consistent with the treatment in rates for regulated operations.  The net amortization expense is included in Interest Expense on the statements of income.

Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities

AEP has several trust funds with significant investments intended to provide for future payments of pension and OPEB benefits, nuclear decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel disposal.  All of the trust funds’ investments are diversified and managed in compliance with all laws and regulations.  The investment strategy for trust funds is to use a diversified portfolio of investments to achieve an acceptable rate of return while managing the interest rate sensitivity of the assets relative to the associated liabilities.  To minimize investment risk, the trust funds are broadly diversified among classes of assets, investment strategies and investment managers.  Management regularly reviews the actual asset allocations and periodically rebalances the investments to targeted allocations when appropriate.  Investment policies and guidelines allow investment managers in approved strategies to use financial derivatives to obtain or manage market exposures and to hedge assets and liabilities.  The investments are reported at fair value under the “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” accounting guidance.

Benefit Plans

All benefit plan assets are invested in accordance with each plan’s investment policy.  The investment policy outlines the investment objectives, strategies and target asset allocations by plan.

The investment philosophies for AEP’s benefit plans support the allocation of assets to minimize risks and optimize net returns.  Strategies used include:

Maintaining a long-term investment horizon.
Diversifying assets to help control volatility of returns at acceptable levels.
Managing fees, transaction costs and tax liabilities to maximize investment earnings.
Using active management of investments where appropriate risk/return opportunities exist.
Keeping portfolio structure style-neutral to limit volatility compared to applicable benchmarks.
Using alternative asset classes such as real estate and private equity to maximize return and provide additional portfolio diversification.


255


The investment policy for the pension fund allocates assets based on the funded status of the pension plan.  The objective of the asset allocation policy is to reduce the investment volatility of the plan over time.  Generally, more of the investment mix will be allocated to fixed income investments as the plan becomes better funded.  Assets will be transferred away from equity investments into fixed income investments based on the market value of plan assets compared to the plan’s projected benefit obligation.  The current target asset allocations are as follows:
Pension Plan Assets
 
Target
Equity
 
30.0
%
Fixed Income
 
55.0
%
Other Investments
 
15.0
%
 
 
 
OPEB Plans Assets
 
Target
Equity
 
65.0
%
Fixed Income
 
33.0
%
Cash
 
2.0
%

The investment policy for each benefit plan contains various investment limitations.  The investment policies establish concentration limits for securities and prohibit the purchase of securities issued by AEP (with the exception of proportionate and immaterial holdings of AEP securities in passive index strategies).  However, the investment policies do not preclude the benefit trust funds from receiving contributions in the form of AEP securities, provided that the AEP securities acquired by each plan may not exceed the limitations imposed by law.  Each investment manager's portfolio is compared to a diversified benchmark index.

For equity investments, the limits are as follows:

No security in excess of 5% of all equities.
Cash equivalents must be less than 10% of an investment manager's equity portfolio.
No individual stock may be more than 10% and 7% for pension and OPEB investments, respectively, of each manager's equity portfolio.
No investment in excess of 5% of an outstanding class of any company.
No securities may be bought or sold on margin or other use of leverage.

For fixed income investments, the concentration limits must not exceed:

3% in any single issuer.
5% for private placements.
5% for convertible securities.
60% for bonds rated AA+ or lower.
50% for bonds rated A+ or lower.
10% for bonds rated BBB- or lower.

For obligations of non-government issuers within the fixed income portfolio, the following limitations apply:

AAA rated debt: a single issuer should account for no more than 5% of the portfolio.
AA+, AA, AA- rated debt: a single issuer should account for no more than 3% of the portfolio.
Debt rated A+ or lower:  a single issuer should account for no more than 2% of the portfolio.
No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in high yield and emerging market debt combined at any time.


256


A portion of the pension assets is invested in real estate funds to provide diversification, add return and hedge against inflation.  Real estate properties are illiquid, difficult to value and not actively traded.  The pension plan uses external real estate investment managers to invest in commingled funds that hold real estate properties.  To mitigate investment risk in the real estate portfolio, commingled real estate funds are used to ensure that holdings are diversified by region, property type and risk classification.  Real estate holdings include core, value-added and development risk classifications and some investments in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), which are publicly traded real estate securities.

A portion of the pension assets is invested in private equity.  Private equity investments add return and provide diversification and typically require a long-term time horizon to evaluate investment performance.  Private equity is classified as an alternative investment because it is illiquid, difficult to value and not actively traded.  The pension plan uses limited partnerships and commingled funds to invest across the private equity investment spectrum.   The private equity holdings are with multiple general partners who help monitor the investments and provide investment selection expertise.  The holdings are currently comprised of venture capital, buyout and hybrid debt and equity investment instruments.  Commingled private equity funds are used to enhance the holdings’ diversity.

AEP participates in a securities lending program with BNY Mellon to provide incremental income on idle assets and to provide income to offset custody fees and other administrative expenses.  AEP lends securities to borrowers approved by BNY Mellon in exchange for collateral.  All loans are collateralized by at least 102% of the loaned asset’s market value and the collateral is invested.  The difference between the rebate owed to the borrower and the collateral rate of return determines the earnings on the loaned security.  The securities lending program’s objective is providing modest incremental income with a limited increase in risk.

Trust owned life insurance (TOLI) underwritten by The Prudential Insurance Company is held in the OPEB plan trusts.  The strategy for holding life insurance contracts in the taxable Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust is to minimize taxes paid on the asset growth in the trust.  Earnings on plan assets are tax-deferred within the TOLI contract and can be tax-free if held until claims are paid.  Life insurance proceeds remain in the trust and are used to fund future retiree medical benefit liabilities.  With consideration to other investments held in the trust, the cash value of the TOLI contracts is invested in two diversified funds.  A portion is invested in a commingled fund with underlying investments in stocks that are actively traded on major international equity exchanges.  The other portion of the TOLI cash value is invested in a diversified, commingled fixed income fund with underlying investments in government bonds, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities.

Cash and cash equivalents are held in each trust to provide liquidity and meet short-term cash needs. Cash equivalent funds are used to provide diversification and preserve principal.  The underlying holdings in the cash funds are investment grade money market instruments including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, treasury bills and other types of investment grade short-term debt securities.  The cash funds are valued each business day and provide daily liquidity.

Nuclear Trust Funds

Nuclear decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel trust funds represent funds that regulatory commissions allow I&M to collect through rates to fund future decommissioning and spent nuclear fuel disposal liabilities.  By rules or orders, the IURC, the MPSC and the FERC established investment limitations and general risk management guidelines.  In general, limitations include:

Acceptable investments (rated investment grade or above when purchased).
Maximum percentage invested in a specific type of investment.
Prohibition of investment in obligations of AEP, I&M or their affiliates.
Withdrawals permitted only for payment of decommissioning costs and trust expenses.


257


I&M maintains trust funds for each regulatory jurisdiction.  Regulatory approval is required to withdraw decommissioning funds.  These funds are managed by external investment managers who must comply with the guidelines and rules of the applicable regulatory authorities. The trust assets are invested to optimize the net of tax earnings of the trust giving consideration to liquidity, risk, diversification and other prudent investment objectives.

I&M records securities held in these trust funds in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on its balance sheets.  I&M records these securities at fair value.  I&M classifies securities in the trust funds as available-for-sale due to their long-term purpose.  Other-than-temporary impairments for investments in both debt and equity securities are considered realized losses as a result of securities being managed by an external investment management firm.  The external investment management firm makes specific investment decisions regarding the debt and equity investments held in these trusts and generally intends to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position as part of a tax optimization strategy.  Impairments reduce the cost basis of the securities which will affect any future unrealized gain or realized gain or loss due to the adjusted cost of investment.  I&M records unrealized gains and other-than-temporary impairments from securities in these trust funds as adjustments to the regulatory liability account for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds and to regulatory assets or liabilities for the SNF disposal trust funds in accordance with their treatment in rates.  Consequently, changes in fair value of trust assets do not affect earnings or AOCI.  See the “Nuclear Contingencies” section of Note 6 for additional discussion of nuclear matters.  See “Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal” section of Note 11 for disclosure of the fair value of assets within the trusts.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from nonowner sources.  It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.  Comprehensive income (loss) has two components: net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss).

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

The Registrant Subsidiaries are wholly-owned subsidiaries of AEP.  Therefore, none are required to report EPS.

OPCo Revised Depreciation Rates

Effective December 1, 2011, OPCo revised book depreciation rates for certain of OPCo’s generation plants consistent with shortened depreciable lives for the generating units.  This change in depreciable lives resulted in a $52 million increase in depreciation expense in 2012.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, OPCo impaired the generating units discussed above (see Note 7 ).  As a result of this impairment of the full book value of these assets, OPCo ceased depreciation on these generating units effective December 1, 2012.

In the second quarter of 2013, OPCo impaired Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (MR5).  As a result of this impairment of the full book value of this generating unit, OPCo ceased depreciation on MR5 effective July 1, 2013.


258


Supplementary Income Statement Information

The following tables provide the components of Depreciation and Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
383,314

 
$
199,249

 
$
188,336

 
$
99,670

 
$
183,253

Amortization of Certain Securitized Assets
 

 

 
43,467

 

 

Amortization of Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
17,568

 
947

 
(18,134
)
 
1,307

 
1,881

Total Depreciation and Amortization
 
$
400,882

 
$
200,196

 
$
213,669

 
$
100,977

 
$
185,134

2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
334,251

 
$
175,852

 
$
358,023

 
$
94,533

 
$
177,352

Amortization of Certain Securitized Assets
 

 

 
19,992

 

 

Amortization of Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
8,392

 
1,875

 
4,555

 
1,134

 
1,899

Total Depreciation and Amortization
 
$
342,643

 
$
177,727

 
$
382,570

 
$
95,667

 
$
179,251

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
$
322,122

 
$
143,674

 
$
495,854

 
$
90,642

 
$
136,874

Amortization of Certain Securitized Assets
 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
22,171

 
2,945

 
15,216

 
4,538

 
1,904

Total Depreciation and Amortization
 
$
344,293

 
$
146,619

 
$
511,070

 
$
95,180

 
$
138,778



259


2 . NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Upon issuance of final pronouncements, management reviews the new accounting literature to determine its relevance, if any, to the Registrant Subsidiaries’ business. The following final pronouncements will impact the financial statements.

ASU 2014-08 “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant and Equipment” (ASU 2014-08)

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08 changing the presentation of discontinued operations on the statements of income and other requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new standard, a disposal of a component or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when the component meets the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale or is disposed. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations and disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations. This standard must be prospectively applied to all reporting periods presented in financial reports issued after the effective date.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. If applicable, this standard will change the presentation of financial statements but will not affect the calculation of net income, comprehensive income or earnings per share. Management adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. Management expects no impact on the financial statements in the first quarter of 2015.

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. As applicable, this standard may change the amount of revenue recognized in the income statements in each reporting period. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on revenue or net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2017.

ASU 2015-01 “Income Statement Extraordinary and Unusual Items” (ASU 2015-01)

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01 eliminating the concept of extraordinary items for presentation on the face of the income statement. Under the new standard, a material event or transaction that is unusual in nature, infrequent or both shall be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Alternatively, it may be disclosed in the notes to financial statements.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted if applied from the beginning of a fiscal year. As applicable, this standard may change the presentation of amounts in the income statements. Management plans to adopt ASU 2015-01 effective January 1, 2016.





260


3 .   COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

The following tables provide the components of changes in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  All amounts in the following tables are presented net of related income taxes.
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
94

 
$
3,090

 
$
20,551

 
$
(20,784
)
 
$
2,951

Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
1,686

 

 

 
2,702

 
4,388

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(1,780
)
 
806

 
(1,333
)
 

 
(2,307
)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(94
)
 
806

 
(1,333
)
 
2,702

 
2,081

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
3,896

 
$
19,218

 
$
(18,082
)
 
$
5,032

APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
(644
)
 
$
2,077

 
$
19,118

 
$
(50,449
)
 
$
(29,898
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
768

 

 

 
29,665

 
30,433

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(30
)
 
1,013

 
1,433

 

 
2,416

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income
738

 
1,013

 
1,433

 
29,665

 
32,849

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
94

 
$
3,090

 
$
20,551

 
$
(20,784
)
 
$
2,951


261


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
46

 
$
(15,976
)
 
$
4,901

 
$
(4,480
)
 
$
(15,509
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
1,130

 

 

 
(546
)
 
584

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(1,176
)
 
1,570

 
171

 

 
565

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(46
)
 
1,570

 
171

 
(546
)
 
1,149

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
(14,406
)
 
$
5,072

 
$
(5,026
)
 
$
(14,360
)
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
(446
)
 
$
(19,647
)
 
$
4,201

 
$
(12,991
)
 
$
(28,883
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
477

 
2,249

 

 
8,511

 
11,237

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
15

 
1,422

 
700

 

 
2,137

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income
492

 
3,671

 
700

 
8,511

 
13,374

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
46

 
$
(15,976
)
 
$
4,901

 
$
(4,480
)
 
$
(15,509
)

262


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
105

 
$
6,974

 
$
58,447

 
$
(58,447
)
 
$
7,079

Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI

 

 

 

 

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(105
)
 
(1,372
)
 

 

 
(1,477
)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss
(105
)
 
(1,372
)
 

 

 
(1,477
)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
5,602

 
$
58,447

 
$
(58,447
)
 
$
5,602

OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
(912
)
 
$
8,095

 
$
45,938

 
$
(218,846
)
 
$
(165,725
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
982

 

 

 
65,418

 
66,400

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
22

 
(1,359
)
 
12,509

 

 
11,172

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
1,004

 
(1,359
)
 
12,509

 
65,418

 
77,572

Distribution of Cook Coal Terminal to Parent

 

 

 
19,652

 
19,652

Distribution of OPCo Generation to Parent
13

 
238

 

 
75,329

 
75,580

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
105

 
$
6,974

 
$
58,447

 
$
(58,447
)
 
$
7,079


263


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
57

 
$
5,701

 
$
5,758

Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI

 

 

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(57
)
 
(758
)
 
(815
)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss
(57
)
 
(758
)
 
(815
)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
4,943

 
$
4,943

PSO
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
21

 
$
6,460

 
$
6,481

Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
68

 

 
68

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(32
)
 
(759
)
 
(791
)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
36

 
(759
)
 
(723
)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
57

 
$
5,701

 
$
5,758


264


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
66

 
$
(13,304
)
 
$
4,523

 
$
271

 
$
(8,444
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI

 

 

 
(285
)
 
(285
)
Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(66
)
 
2,268

 
(939
)
 

 
1,263

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(66
)
 
2,268

 
(939
)
 
(285
)
 
978

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
(11,036
)
 
$
3,584

 
$
(14
)
 
$
(7,466
)
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Amortization
of Deferred
Costs
 
Changes
in Funded
Status
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
$
22

 
$
(15,571
)
 
$
4,778

 
$
(7,089
)
 
$
(17,860
)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
83

 

 

 
7,360

 
7,443

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(39
)
 
2,267

 
(255
)
 

 
1,973

Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
44

 
2,267

 
(255
)
 
7,360

 
9,416

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2013
$
66

 
$
(13,304
)
 
$
4,523

 
$
271

 
$
(8,444
)


265


Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following tables provide details of reclassifications from AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  The amortization of pension and OPEB AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and OPEB costs.  See Note 8 for additional details.
APCo
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in thousands)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$

 
$
(80
)
Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
(527
)
 
90

Other Operation Expense
 
(10
)
 
(37
)
Maintenance Expense
 
(20
)
 
(31
)
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(17
)
 
(35
)
Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(2,165
)
 
47

Subtotal  Commodity
 
(2,739
)
 
(46
)
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
1,241

 
1,559

Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
1,241

 
1,559

 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(1,498
)
 
1,513

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(524
)
 
530

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(974
)
 
983

 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
(5,129
)
 
(5,129
)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
3,079

 
7,334

Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(2,050
)
 
2,205

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(717
)
 
772

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(1,333
)
 
1,433

 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
(2,307
)
 
$
2,416


266


I&M
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Amount of (Gain) Loss
Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in thousands)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$

 
$
(155
)
Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
(812
)
 
219

Other Operation Expense
 
(7
)
 
(23
)
Maintenance Expense
 
(7
)
 
(14
)
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(10
)
 
(20
)
Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(973
)
 
16

Subtotal  Commodity
 
(1,809
)
 
23

 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
2,413

 
2,188

Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
2,413

 
2,188

 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
604

 
2,211

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
210

 
774

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
394

 
1,437

 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
(794
)
 
(794
)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
1,056

 
1,872

Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
262

 
1,078

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
91

 
378

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
171

 
700

 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
565

 
$
2,137


267


OPCo
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Amount of (Gain) Loss
Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in thousands)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$

 
$
(415
)
Purchased Electricity for Resale
 

 
576

Other Operation Expense
 
(11
)
 
(56
)
Maintenance Expense
 
(11
)
 
(26
)
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(18
)
 
(45
)
Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(122
)
 

Subtotal  Commodity
 
(162
)
 
34

 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
 
(13
)
 
7

Interest Expense
 
(2,098
)
 
(2,098
)
Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
(2,111
)
 
(2,091
)
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(2,273
)
 
(2,057
)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(796
)
 
(720
)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(1,477
)
 
(1,337
)
 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 

 
(5,840
)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 

 
25,085

Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 

 
19,245

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 

 
6,736

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 

 
12,509

 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
(1,477
)
 
$
11,172


268


PSO
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Amount of (Gain) Loss
Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in thousands)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Other Operation Expense
 
$
(8
)
 
$
(25
)
Maintenance Expense
 
(9
)
 
(10
)
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(13
)
 
(15
)
Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(58
)
 

Subtotal  Commodity
 
(88
)
 
(50
)
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
(1,167
)
 
(1,167
)
Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
(1,167
)
 
(1,167
)
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(1,255
)
 
(1,217
)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(440
)
 
(426
)
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
(815
)
 
$
(791
)

269


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Amount of (Gain) Loss
Reclassified from AOCI
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
 
(in thousands)
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
Other Operation Expense
 
$
(13
)
 
$
(29
)
Maintenance Expense
 
(10
)
 
(15
)
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(11
)
 
(17
)
Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net (a)
 
(67
)
 

Subtotal  Commodity
 
(101
)
 
(61
)
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency:
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense
 
3,488

 
3,488

Subtotal  Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
3,488

 
3,488

 
 
 
 
 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
3,387

 
3,427

Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
1,185

 
1,199

Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
2,202

 
2,228

 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
(1,912
)
 
(1,785
)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
468

 
1,393

Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(1,444
)
 
(392
)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(505
)
 
(137
)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
(939
)
 
(255
)
 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit
 
$
1,263

 
$
1,973


(a)
Represents realized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.

270


The following table provide details on designated, effective cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets and the reasons for changes in cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2012.  All amounts in the following table are presented net of related income taxes.
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Activity for Cash Flow Hedges
 Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2011
 
$
(1,309
)
 
$
(819
)
 
$
(1,748
)
 
$
(69
)
 
$
(62
)
Changes in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
 
(1,310
)
 
(987
)
 
(2,002
)
 
104

 
100

Amount of (Gain) or Loss Reclassified from AOCI to Statement of Income/within Balance Sheet:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
(16
)
 
(43
)
 
(109
)
 

 

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
440

 
1,151

 
3,002

 

 

Other Operation Expense
 
(25
)
 
(14
)
 
(35
)
 
(14
)
 
(11
)
Maintenance Expense
 

 
(2
)
 
(5
)
 
1

 

Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(14
)
 
(10
)
 
(15
)
 
(1
)
 
(5
)
Regulatory Assets (a)
 
1,590

 
278

 

 

 

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
 
$
(644
)
 
$
(446
)
 
$
(912
)
 
$
21

 
$
22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2011
 
$
1,024

 
$
(14,465
)
 
$
9,454

 
$
7,218

 
$
(15,462
)
Changes in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
 

 
(5,777
)
 

 

 
(2,778
)
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Reclassified from AOCI to Statement of Income/within Balance Sheet:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
 

 

 
4

 

 

Interest Expense
 
1,053

 
595

 
(1,363
)
 
(758
)
 
2,669

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
 
$
2,077

 
$
(19,647
)
 
$
8,095

 
$
6,460

 
$
(15,571
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total – Cash Flow Hedges
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2011
 
$
(285
)
 
$
(15,284
)
 
$
7,706

 
$
7,149

 
$
(15,524
)
Changes in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI
 
(1,310
)
 
(6,764
)
 
(2,002
)
 
104

 
(2,678
)
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Reclassified from AOCI to Statement of Income/within Balance Sheet:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
(16
)
 
(43
)
 
(109
)
 

 

Purchased Electricity for Resale
 
440

 
1,151

 
3,002

 

 

Other Operation Expense
 
(25
)
 
(14
)
 
(35
)
 
(14
)
 
(11
)
Maintenance Expense
 

 
(2
)
 
(5
)
 
1

 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense
 

 

 
4

 

 

Interest Expense
 
1,053

 
595

 
(1,363
)
 
(758
)
 
2,669

Property, Plant and Equipment
 
(14
)
 
(10
)
 
(15
)
 
(1
)
 
(5
)
Regulatory Assets (a)
 
1,590

 
278

 

 

 

Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2012
 
$
1,433

 
$
(20,093
)
 
$
7,183

 
$
6,481

 
$
(15,549
)

(a)
Represents realized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.  

271


4 .   RATE MATTERS

The Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in rate and regulatory proceedings at the FERC and their state commissions.  Rate matters can have a material impact on net income, cash flows and possibly financial condition.  The Registrant Subsidiaries’ recent significant rate orders and pending rate filings are addressed in this note.

OPCo Rate Matters

Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings

2009 – 2011 ESP

The PUCO issued an order in March 2009 that modified and approved the ESP which established rates at the start of the April 2009 billing cycle through 2011. OPCo collected the 2009 annualized revenue increase over the last nine months of 2009. The order also provided a phase-in FAC, which was authorized to be recovered through a non-bypassable surcharge over the period 2012 through 2018. The PUCO’s March 2009 order was appealed to the Supreme Court of Ohio, which issued an opinion and remanded certain issues back to the PUCO.

In October 2011, the PUCO issued an order in the remand proceeding, which was subsequently appealed. In February 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the PUCO’s decision and rejected all appeals.

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate proceeding which implemented a PIRR to recover deferred fuel costs in rates beginning September 2012. The PUCO ruled that carrying charges should be calculated without an offset for accumulated deferred income taxes and that a long-term debt rate should be applied when collections begin. In November 2012, OPCo appealed that PUCO order to the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming a long-term debt rate modified the previously adjudicated 2009 - 2011 ESP order, which granted a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) rate. In November 2012, the IEU and the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) also filed appeals of the PUCO decision which principally argued that the PUCO should have reduced the deferred fuel balance to reflect the prior “improper” collection of POLR revenues. IEU's appeal also argued that carrying costs should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit which, as of December 31, 2014 , could reduce carrying costs by $26 million including $14 million of unrecognized equity carrying costs. In December 2014, IEU filed a motion to withdraw its argument related to the collection of POLR revenues. In January 2015, the OCC filed a request to dismiss its appeal altogether. Oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Ohio were held in February 2015. OPCo argued for a remand to reinstate the WACC carrying charges initially approved by the PUCO and challenged the IEU argument that the carrying charges should be reduced due to an accumulated deferred income tax credit. A decision from the Supreme Court of Ohio is pending.

Management is unable to predict the outcome of the unresolved litigation discussed above. Depending on the rulings in these proceedings, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

June 2012 – May 2015 ESP Including Capacity Charge

In August 2012, the PUCO issued an order which adopted and modified a new ESP that established base generation rates through May 2015. This ruling was generally upheld in rehearing orders in January and March 2013.

In July 2012, the PUCO issued an order in a separate capacity proceeding which stated that OPCo must charge CRES providers the RPM price and authorized OPCo to defer a portion of its incurred capacity costs not recovered from CRES providers up to $188.88 /MW day.  The OPCo RPM price collected from CRES providers, which includes reserve margins, was approximately $34 /MW day through May 2014 and is $150 /MW day from June 2014 through May 2015.  In December 2012, various parties filed notices of appeal of the capacity costs decision with the Supreme Court of Ohio.


272


As part of the August 2012 ESP order, the PUCO established a non-bypassable RSR, effective September 2012.  The RSR was collected from customers at $3.50 /MWh through May 2014 and is currently collected at $4.00 /MWh for the period June 2014 through May 2015, with $1.00 /MWh applied to the recovery of deferred capacity costs.  As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo’s incurred deferred capacity costs balance of $422 million , including debt carrying costs, was recorded in regulatory assets on the balance sheet.

In 2013, the PUCO issued its Orders on Rehearing for the ESP which generally upheld its August 2012 order, including the implementation of the RSR. The PUCO clarified that a final reconciliation of revenues and expenses would be permitted for any over- or under-recovery on several riders including fuel. In addition, the PUCO addressed certain issues around the energy auctions while other SSO issues related to the energy auctions were deferred to a separate docket related to the competitive bid process (CBP). In 2013, OPCo and various intervenors filed appeals with the Supreme Court of Ohio challenging portions of the PUCO’s ESP order, including the RSR.

In November 2013, the PUCO issued an order approving OPCo’s CBP with modifications. As ordered, in 2014, OPCo conducted multiple energy-only auctions for a total of 100% of the SSO load with delivery beginning April 2014 through May 2015. For delivery starting in June 2015, OPCo will conduct energy and capacity auctions for its entire SSO load. The PUCO also approved the unbundling of the FAC into fixed and energy-related components and an intervenor proposal to blend the $188.88/MW day capacity price in proportion to the percentage of energy planned to be auctioned. Additionally, the PUCO ordered that intervenor concerns related to the recovery of the fixed fuel costs through potentially both the FAC and the approved capacity charges be addressed in subsequent FAC proceedings. Management believes that these intervenor concerns are without merit.

In January 2014, the PUCO denied all rehearing requests and agreed to issue a supplemental request for an independent auditor in the 2012 - 2013 FAC proceeding to separately examine the recovery of the fixed fuel costs, including OVEC. In March 2014, the PUCO approved OPCo’s request to implement riders related to the unbundling of the FAC. In October 2014, the independent auditor, selected by the PUCO, filed its report for the period August 2012 through May 2015 with the PUCO. If the PUCO ultimately concludes that a portion of the fixed fuel costs are also recovered through OPCo's $188.88/MW day capacity charge, the independent auditor recommends a methodology for calculating a refund of a portion of certain fixed fuel costs. The retail share of these fixed fuel costs is approximately $90 million annually. A hearing related to this matter has not been scheduled. Management believes that no over-recovery of costs has occurred and intends to oppose the findings in the audit report.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Proposed June 2015 – May 2018 ESP

In December 2013, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO to approve an ESP that includes proposed rate adjustments and the continuation and modification of certain existing riders, including the Distribution Investment Rider (DIR), effective June 2015 through May 2018. The proposal included a return on common equity of 10.65% on capital costs for certain riders and estimates an average decrease in rates of 9% over the three-year term of the plan for customers who receive their RPM capacity and energy auction-based generation through OPCo. The proposal also included a purchased power agreement (PPA) rider that would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based purchase power agreement. The PPA would initially be based upon the OVEC contractual entitlement and could, upon further approval, be expanded to include other contracts involving other Ohio legacy generation assets. In May 2014, intervenors and the PUCO staff filed testimony that provided various recommendations including the rejection and/or modification of various riders, including the DIR and the proposed PPA. Hearings at the PUCO in the ESP case were held in June 2014.


273


In July 2014, OPCo submitted a separate application to continue the RSR established in the June 2012 - May 2015 ESP to collect the unrecovered portion of the deferred capacity costs at the rate of $4.00 /MWh until the balance of the capacity deferrals has been collected. In December 2014, the PUCO staff and intervenors filed comments related to the RSR application. The PUCO staff recommended approval of the application. Intervenors objected to the application and recommended approval of a pending motion to dismiss.

In October 2014, OPCo filed a separate application with the PUCO to propose a new extended PPA for inclusion in the PPA rider, discussed above. The new PPA would include an additional 2,671 MW to be purchased from AGR over the life of the respective generating units.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Significantly Excessive Earnings Test Filings

In January 2011, the PUCO issued an order on the 2009 SEET filing. The order gave consideration for a future commitment to invest $20 million to support the development of a large solar farm. In January 2013, the PUCO found there was not a need for the large solar farm. The PUCO noted that OPCo remains obligated to spend $20 million on this solar project or another project. In September 2013, a proposed second phase of OPCo’s gridSMART ® program was filed with the PUCO which included a proposed project to satisfy this PUCO directive. A decision from the PUCO is pending.

In March 2014, the PUCO approved a stipulation agreement between OPCo and the PUCO staff that there were no significantly excessive earnings in 2011 for CSPCo or OPCo. In May 2014 and December 2014, the PUCO approved stipulation agreements between OPCo and the PUCO staff that there were no significantly excessive earnings for OPCo in 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of 2014 SEET requirements.

Corporate Separation

In October 2012, the PUCO issued an order which approved the corporate separation of OPCo’s generation assets including the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets and associated generation liabilities at net book value to AGR. In June 2013, the IEU filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming the PUCO order approving the corporate separation was unlawful. A decision from the Supreme Court of Ohio is pending. In December 2013, corporate separation of OPCo’s generation assets was completed. If any part of the PUCO order is overturned, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Storm Damage Recovery Rider (SDRR)

In December 2012, OPCo submitted an application with the PUCO to establish initial SDRR rates to recover 2012 incremental storm distribution expenses. In April 2014, the PUCO approved a stipulation agreement to recover $55 million over a 12-month period. The agreement also provided that carrying charges using a long-term debt rate will be assessed from April 2013 until recovery begins, but no additional carrying charges will accrue during the actual recovery period. Compliance tariffs were filed with the PUCO and new rates were implemented in April 2014. In May 2014, the PUCO upheld the settlement agreement on rehearing.

2009 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audit

In January 2012, the PUCO issued an order in OPCo’s 2009 FAC that the remaining $65 million in proceeds from a 2008 coal contract settlement agreement be applied against OPCo’s under-recovered fuel balance. In April 2012, on rehearing, the PUCO ordered that the settlement credit only needed to reflect the Ohio retail jurisdictional share of the gain not already flowed through the FAC with carrying charges. As a result, OPCo recorded a $30 million net favorable adjustment on the statement of income in 2012. The January 2012 PUCO order also stated that a consultant should be hired to review the coal reserve valuation and recommend whether any additional value should benefit ratepayers.

274


In August 2012, intervenors filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Ohio claiming the settlement credit ordered by the PUCO should have reflected the remaining gain not already flowed through the FAC, with carrying charges. In September 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio upheld the PUCO order. A review of the coal reserve valuation by an outside consultant is still pending. If the PUCO ultimately determines that additional amounts should benefit ratepayers as a result of the consultant’s review of the coal reserve valuation, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2010 and 2011 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audits

The PUCO-selected outside consultant issued its 2010 and 2011 FAC audit reports which included a recommendation that the PUCO reexamine the carrying costs on the deferred FAC balance and determine whether the carrying costs on the balance should be net of accumulated income taxes with the use of a WACC. In May 2014, the PUCO issued an order that generally approved OPCo's 2010-2011 fuel costs and rejected the auditor recommendation to adjust the WACC carrying charges related to accumulated deferred income taxes. Additionally, the PUCO requested further review related to an affiliate barging agreement and the modification of certain fuel procurement processes and practices. Further, the order provided for the auditor to address any remaining concerns in the next audit report, as deemed necessary. In July 2014, the PUCO issued an order that denied all requests for rehearing.

2012 and 2013 Fuel Adjustment Clause Audits

In May 2014, the PUCO-selected outside consultant provided its final report related to its 2012 and 2013 FAC audit which included certain unfavorable recommendations related to the FAC recovery for 2012 and 2013. These recommendations are opposed by OPCo. In addition, the PUCO will consider the results of the final audit of the recovery of fixed fuel costs that was issued in October 2014. See the "June 2012 - May 2015 ESP Including Capacity Charge" section above. If the PUCO orders a reduction to the FAC deferral or a refund to customers, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Ormet

Ormet, a large aluminum company, had a contract to purchase power from OPCo through 2018. In February 2013, Ormet filed for bankruptcy and subsequently shut down operations in October 2013. Based upon previous PUCO rulings providing rate assistance to Ormet, the PUCO is expected to permit OPCo to recover unpaid Ormet amounts through the Economic Development Rider (EDR), except where recovery from ratepayers is limited to $20 million related to previously deferred payments from Ormet’s October and November 2012 power bills. In February 2014, a stipulation agreement between OPCo and Ormet was filed with the PUCO. The stipulation recommended approval of OPCo’s right to fully recover approximately $49 million of foregone revenues through the EDR. Intervenor comments were also filed objecting to full recovery of these foregone revenues. In March 2014, the PUCO issued an order in OPCo’s EDR filing allowing OPCo to include $39 million of Ormet-related foregone revenues in the EDR effective April 2014. The order stated that if the stipulation agreement between OPCo and Ormet is subsequently adopted by the PUCO, OPCo could file an application to modify the EDR rate for the remainder of the period requesting recovery of the remaining $10 million of Ormet deferrals which, as of December 31, 2014 , is recorded in regulatory assets on the balance sheet. In April 2014, an intervenor filed testimony objecting to $5 million of the remaining foregone revenues. A hearing at the PUCO related to the stipulation agreement was held in May 2014.

In addition, in the 2009 - 2011 ESP proceeding, intervenors requested that OPCo be required to refund the Ormet-related revenues under a previous interim arrangement (effective from January 2009 through September 2009) and requested that the PUCO prevent OPCo from collecting Ormet-related revenues in the future. Through September 2009, the last month of the interim arrangement, OPCo had $64 million of deferred FAC costs related to the interim arrangement, excluding $2 million of unrecognized equity carrying costs. The PUCO did not take any action on this request. The intervenors raised this issue again in response to OPCo’s November 2009 filing to approve recovery of the deferral under the interim agreement.

To the extent amounts discussed above are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

275


Ohio IGCC Plant

In 2005, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO seeking authority to recover costs of building and operating an IGCC power plant. As of December 31, 2014 , OPCo has collected $24 million in pre-construction costs authorized in a 2006 PUCO order. Intervenors filed motions and comments with the PUCO requesting that OPCo refund all collected pre-construction costs to Ohio ratepayers with interest. In December 2014, a stipulation agreement between OPCo, the PUCO staff and intervenors was filed at the PUCO. The parties to the stipulation agreement proposed that OPCo will refund $13 million to its customers. In February 2015, the PUCO approved the stipulation agreement.

SWEPCo Rate Matters

2012 Texas Base Rate Case
 
In July 2012, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT to increase annual base rates primarily due to the completion of the Turk Plant. In October 2013, the PUCT issued an order affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant but determined that the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap established in a previous Certificate of Convenience and Necessity case also limited SWEPCo’s recovery of AFUDC in addition to limits on its recovery of cash construction costs. Additionally, the PUCT deferred consideration of the requested increase in depreciation expense related to the change in the 2016 retirement date of the Welsh Plant, Unit 2. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Unit 2 was $84 million , before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP. See “Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016” section of Note 5 .

Upon rehearing in January 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, SWEPCo reversed $114 million of previously recorded regulatory disallowances. The resulting annual base rate increase is approximately $52 million . In March 2014, the PUCT issued an order related to the January 2014 PUCT ruling and in April 2014, this order became final. In May 2014, intervenors filed appeals of that order with the Texas District Court. In June 2014, SWEPCo intervened in those appeals and filed initial responses.

If certain parts of the PUCT order are overturned or if SWEPCo cannot ultimately recover its Texas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant investment, including AFUDC, or its retirement-related costs and potential fuel or replacement power disallowances related to Welsh Plant, Unit 2, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Texas Transmission Cost Recovery Factor Filing

In May 2014, SWEPCo filed an application with the PUCT to implement its transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) requesting additional annual revenue of $15 million . The TCRF is designed to recover increases from the amounts included in SWEPCo’s Texas retail base rates for transmission infrastructure improvement costs and wholesale transmission charges under a tariff approved by the FERC. SWEPCo’s application included Turk Plant transmission-related costs. In November 2014, the PUCT issued an order approving a proposal for decision, issued by an Administrative Law Judge in October 2014, that recommended approval of SWEPCo's application with an increase in annual revenue of $14 million . In December 2014, the PUCT order became final and TCRF rates were implemented.

2012 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In 2012, SWEPCo initiated a proceeding to establish new formula base rates in Louisiana, including recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share (approximately 29% ) of the Turk Plant. In February 2013, a settlement was filed and approved by the LPSC. The settlement increased Louisiana total rates by approximately $2 million annually, effective March 2013, which consisted of an increase in base rates of approximately $85 million annually offset by a decrease in fuel and other rates of approximately $83 million annually.  The March 2013 base rates are based on a 10% return on common equity and cost recovery of the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant and Stall Unit. The rates are subject to refund based on the staff review of the cost of service and the prudency review of the Turk Plant. The

276


settlement also provided that the LPSC review base rates in 2014 and 2015 and that SWEPCo recover non-fuel Turk Plant costs and a full weighted-average cost of capital return on the prudently incurred Turk Plant investment in jurisdictional rate base, effective January 2013. In December 2014, the LPSC approved a settlement agreement related to the staff review of the cost of service. The settlement agreement reduced the requested revenue increase by $3 million , primarily due to the timing of both the allowed recovery of certain existing regulatory assets and the establishment of a regulatory asset for certain previously expensed costs. If the LPSC orders refunds based upon the pending prudence review of the Turk Plant investment, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2014 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In April 2014, SWEPCo filed its annual formula rate plan for test year 2013 with the LPSC.  The filing included a $5 million annual increase, which was effective August 2014.  SWEPCo also proposed to increase rates by an additional $15 million annually, effective January 2015, for a total annual increase of $20 million . This additional increase reflects the cost of incremental generation to be used to serve Louisiana customers in 2015 due to the expiration of a purchase power agreement attributable to Louisiana customers.  In December 2014, the LPSC approved a partial settlement agreement that included the implementation of the $15 million annual increase in rates effective January 2015. These increases are subject to LPSC staff review and are subject to refund.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 - Environmental Projects

To comply with pending Federal EPA regulations, SWEPCo is currently constructing environmental control projects to meet mercury and air toxics standards for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 at a cost of approximately $410 million , excluding AFUDC.  Management currently estimates that the total environmental projects to be completed through 2020 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 will cost approximately $600 million , excluding AFUDC.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has incurred costs of $164 million and has remaining contractual construction obligations of $108 million related to these projects.  SWEPCo will seek recovery of these project costs from customers through filings at the state commissions and the FERC. As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $388 million , before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. 

APCo Rate Matters

Plant Transfer

APCo and WPCo provide retail electric service at bundled rates approved by the WVPSC, with rates set on a cost-of-service basis, to their respective customers. West Virginia generally allows for timely recovery of fuel costs through an expanded net energy cost which trues-up to actual expenses. In March 2014, APCo and WPCo filed a request with the WVPSC for approval to transfer at net book value to WPCo a one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, comprising 780 MW of average annual generating capacity presently owned by AGR. In April 2014, APCo and WPCo filed testimony that supported their request and proposed a base rate surcharge of $113 million , to be offset by an equal reduction in the ENEC revenues, to be effective upon the transfer of the Mitchell Plant to WPCo until APCo's West Virginia base rates are updated. See the "2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case" below. In June 2014, the FERC issued an order approving a request by AGR and WPCo to transfer AGR’s one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo.

In October 2014, a stipulation agreement between APCo, WPCo, the WVPSC staff and intervenors in the case was filed with the WVPSC. The stipulation agreement recommended approval for WPCo to acquire, at net book value, the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant, excluding certain assets, and to pay AGR $20 million upon transfer, which WPCo will record as a regulatory asset, include in rate base and recover over the life of the plant. Additionally, the agreement stated that 82.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest will be reflected in rates effective from the date of the transfer via a surcharge with an offset in ENEC revenues of $93 million . The remaining 17.5% of the costs associated with the acquired interest is to be included in rates by January 2020. The agreement also proposed

277


that WPCo share the energy margins for 82.5% of the plant’s output with ratepayers and that WPCo retain all of the energy margins from sales into the wholesale market on the remaining 17.5% , to offset fixed costs associated with this portion, until the remaining portion is included in rates. In December 2014, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the settlement agreement, subject to certain modifications related to 82.5% of the energy and capacity margin sharing. The WVPSC determined that the sharing mechanism that was proposed is reasonable and will be adopted provided the result of the sharing mechanism will be adjusted, if necessary, so that the sharing mechanism does not result in a net cost to ratepayers that exceeds the actual variable cost of generation. In January 2015, the transfer of the one-half interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo was completed.

2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case

In March 2014, APCo filed a biennial generation and distribution base rate case with the Virginia SCC. In accordance with a Virginia statute, APCo did not request a change in base rates as its Virginia retail combined rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013 was within the statutory range of the approved return on common equity of 10.9% . The filing included a request to decrease generation depreciation rates, effective February 2015, primarily due to changes in the expected service lives of various generating units and the extended recovery through 2040 of the net book value of certain planned 2015 plant retirements. Additionally, the filing included a request to amortize $7 million annually for two years, beginning February 2015, related to IGCC and other deferred costs. APCo also requested approval to amortize $38 million related to an accumulated deferred Virginia state income tax (ADVSIT) liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015.

In November 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order concluding that APCo's adjusted earned rate of return on common equity for 2012 and 2013, reflecting their ordered adjustments, was above the allowed threshold. The order included (a) a $6 million refund to customers for the years 2012 through 2013, (b) the write-off of $10 million of IGCC pre-construction costs, (c) approval to amortize a $38 million ADVSIT liability over 20 years, beginning February 2015 and (d) no change to generation depreciation rates with rates to be reviewed again in the next biennial rate case. The order also approved a new return on common equity of 9.7% effective for 2014 and 2015. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of this order for 2014.

The Virginia SCC did not rule on a Virginia SCC staff recommendation to write-down certain costs, for ratemaking purposes, for the biennial period based on APCo’s earnings within the statutory equity range. In January 2015, the Virginia SCC initiated a separate proceeding to address the proper treatment of APCo’s authorized regulatory assets. As of December 31, 2014, APCo’s authorized regulatory assets under review in the separate proceeding, based upon the Virginia SCC staff recommendation, are estimated to be $15 million . In February 2015, initial briefs related to this proceeding were filed by various parties. If any of these costs, or any additional costs that may be subject to review, are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Potential New Virginia Legislation Affecting Biennial Reviews

In February 2015, amendments to Virginia law governing the regulation of investor-owned electric utilities were approved by the Virginia General Assembly and have been sent to the Governor. If these amendments are enacted, APCo’s existing generation and distribution base rates would freeze until after the Virginia SCC rules on APCo’s next biennial review, which APCo would file in March 2020 for the 2018 and 2019 test years. These amendments would also preclude the Virginia SCC from performing biennial reviews of APCo’s earnings for the years 2014 through 2017. Management continues to monitor this potential new legislation in Virginia.

2014 West Virginia Base Rate Case

In June 2014, APCo filed a request with the WVPSC to increase annual base rates by $156 million , based upon a 10.62% return on common equity, to be effective in the second quarter of 2015.  The filing included a request to increase generation depreciation rates primarily due to the increase in plant investment and changes in the expected service lives of various generating units.  The filing also requested recovery of $77 million over five years related to 2012 West Virginia storm costs, IGCC and other deferred costs.  In addition to the base rate request, the filing also included

278


a request to implement a rider of approximately $38 million annually to recover vegetation management costs, including a return on capital investment.  In October 2014, the WVPSC approved APCo's motion to revise the procedural schedule which included a request to change the date of implementation of the new rates to May 2015.  In December 2014 and January 2015, intervenors filed testimony which proposed total annual revenue increases ranging from $30 million to $51 million based upon returns on common equity ranging from 9% to 10% and regulatory asset disallowances ranging from $6 million to $8 million .  Additionally, other intervenors proposed that the revenue requirement be based on a return on common equity of 8.7% and that $77 million of regulatory assets be disallowed.  Intervenors also recommended a disallowance of approximately $38 million related to the December 2013 transfer of OPCo's two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo.  Hearings at the WVPSC were held in January 2015.  If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2013 Virginia Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause (Transmission RAC)

In December 2013, APCo filed with the Virginia SCC to increase its transmission RAC revenues by $50 million annually to be effective May 2014.  In March 2014, the Virginia SCC issued an order approving a stipulation agreement between APCo and the Virginia SCC staff increasing the transmission RAC revenues by $49 million annually, subject to true-up, effective May 2014. Pursuant to the order, the Virginia SCC staff will audit APCo’s transmission RAC under-recoveries and report its findings and recommendations in testimony in APCo’s next transmission RAC proceeding in 2015.

WPCo Merger with APCo

In December 2011, APCo and WPCo filed an application with the WVPSC requesting authority to merge WPCo into APCo. In December 2014, the WVPSC issued an order that dismissed the docket related to the merger of WPCo into APCo. See the “Plant Transfer” section of APCo Rate Matters.

PSO Rate Matters

2014 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In January 2014, PSO filed a request with the OCC to increase annual base rates by $38 million , based upon a 10.5% return on common equity.  This revenue increase includes a proposed increase in depreciation rates of $29 million .  In addition, the filing proposed recovery of advanced metering costs through a separate rider over a three-year deployment period requesting $7 million of revenues in year one, increasing to $28 million in year three.  The filing also proposed expansion of an existing transmission rider currently recovered in base rates to include additional transmission-related costs that are expected to increase over the next several years.

In April and May 2014, testimony was filed by the OCC staff and intervenors with recommendations that included adjustments to annual base rates ranging from an increase of $16 million to a reduction of $22 million , primarily based upon the determination of depreciation rates and a return on common equity between 9.18% and 9.5% . Additionally, the recommendations did not support the advanced metering rider or the expansion of the transmission rider. In May 2014, PSO filed rebuttal testimony that included an updated annual base rate increase request of $42 million to reflect certain updated costs.

In June 2014, a non-unanimous stipulation agreement between PSO, the OCC staff and certain intervenors was filed with the OCC. The parties to the stipulation recommended no overall change to the transmission rider or to annual revenues, other than additional revenues through a separate rider related to advanced metering costs, and that the terms of the stipulation be effective November 2014. The advanced metering rider would provide $24 million of revenues over 14 months beginning in November 2014 and increase to $27 million in 2016. New depreciation rates are recommended for advanced metering investments and existing meters, also to be effective November 2014. Further, the stipulation recommends a return on common equity of 9.85% to be used only in the formula to calculate AFUDC, factoring of customer receivables and for riders with an equity component. Additionally, the stipulation recommends recovery of regulatory assets for 2013 storms and regulatory case expenses. In July 2014, the Attorney General joined

279


in the stipulation agreement. A hearing at the OCC was held in July 2014. In October 2014, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommended approval of the stipulation agreement and interim rates were implemented in November 2014, subject to refund. In November 2014, intervenors opposing the stipulation agreement filed exceptions to the ALJ's report and oral arguments were held at the OCC in December 2014. An order is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015. If the OCC were to disallow any portion of this settlement agreement, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

I&M Rate Matters
 
2011 Indiana Base Rate Case
 
In February 2013, the IURC issued an order that granted an $85 million annual increase in base rates based upon a return on common equity of 10.2% and adjusted the authorized annual increase in base rates to $92 million in March 2013. In April 2014, the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) filed an appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court related to the inclusion of a prepaid pension asset in rate base, which is approximately $7 million in annual revenues. In August 2014, the Indiana Supreme Court denied the appeal filed by the OUCC.

Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project (LCM Project)

In 2012, I&M filed a petition with the IURC and the MPSC for approval of the LCM Project, which consists of a group of capital projects to ensure the safe and reliable operations of the Cook Plant through its licensed life (2034 for Unit 1 and 2037 for Unit 2). The estimated cost of the LCM Project is $1.2 billion to be incurred through 2018, excluding AFUDC.  As of December 31, 2014 , I&M has incurred costs of $550 million related to the LCM Project, including AFUDC.

In July 2013, the IURC approved I&M’s proposed project with the exception of an estimated $23 million related to certain items that might accommodate a future potential power uprate which the IURC stated I&M could seek recovery of in a subsequent base rate case. I&M will recover approved costs through an LCM rider which will be determined in semi-annual proceedings. The IURC authorized deferral accounting for costs incurred related to certain projects effective January 2012 to the extent such costs are not reflected in rates. In May 2014, the IURC issued a final order approving the LCM rider rates that were implemented in January 2014.

In January 2013, the MPSC approved a Certificate of Need (CON) for the LCM Project and authorized deferral accounting for costs incurred related to the approved projects effective January 2013 until these costs are included in rates. In February 2013, intervenors filed appeals with the Michigan Court of Appeals objecting to the issuance of the CON as well as the amount of the CON related to the LCM Project. In October 2014, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued an order that affirmed the MPSC decision in part, but reversed the portion of the MPSC decision related to certain costs. The order indicated that I&M could recover those costs in a future Michigan base case if they can show that the costs were reasonable and prudent.

If I&M is not ultimately permitted to recover its LCM Project costs, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Tanners Creek Plant

I&M announced that it would retire Tanners Creek Plant by June 2015 to comply with proposed environmental regulations. I&M is currently recovering depreciation and a return on the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant in base rates and plans to seek recovery of all of the plant’s retirement related costs in its next Indiana and Michigan base rate cases.

In December 2013, I&M filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 and the Tanners Creek Plant due to the retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant in 2015. Upon the retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant, I&M proposed that, for purposes of determining its depreciation rates, the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant be recovered over the remaining life of the Rockport Plant.


280


In September 2014, a settlement agreement was approved by the MPSC that included the authorization for I&M to implement revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1, effective upon the retirement date of the Tanners Creek Plant. Upon implementation of the revised depreciation rates, I&M is authorized to reduce customer rates through a credit rider until the revised rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 are included in base rates.

In October 2014, I&M filed a similar application with the IURC seeking approval of revised depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 and the Tanners Creek Plant. Upon retirement of the Tanners Creek Plant, I&M proposed that, for purposes of determining its depreciation rates, the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant be recovered over the remaining life of the Rockport Plant. The new depreciation rates would result in a decrease in I&M's Indiana jurisdictional electric depreciation expense which I&M proposed to reduce customer rates through a credit rider. In February 2015, the OUCC filed testimony that recommended approval of I&M's application. A hearing at the IURC is scheduled for March 2015.

As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant was $340 million , before cost of removal, including material and supplies inventory and CWIP.  See “Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016” section of Note 5 . If I&M is ultimately not permitted to fully recover its net book value of the Tanners Creek Plant and its retirement-related costs, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Transmission, Distribution and Storage System Improvement Charge (TDSIC)

In October 2014, I&M filed petitions with the IURC for approval of a TDSIC Rider and approval of I&M’s seven-year TDSIC Plan, from 2015 through 2021, for eligible transmission, distribution and storage system improvements. The initial estimated cost of the capital improvements and associated operation and maintenance expenses included in the TDSIC Plan of $787 million , excluding AFUDC, will be updated annually. The TDSIC Plan included distribution investments specific to the Indiana jurisdiction. The TDSIC Rider will allow the periodic adjustment of I&M's rates to provide for timely recovery of 80% of approved TDSIC Plan costs. I&M will defer the remaining 20% of approved TDSIC Plan costs to be recovered in I&M's next general rate case. I&M is not seeking a rate adjustment in this proceeding but is seeking approval of a TDSIC Rider rate adjustment mechanism for subsequent proceedings. In January 2015, intervenors filed testimony that recommended denial of certain portions of the TDSIC Plan including recommended changes to the capital structure, recovery of requested operation and maintenance cost allocations and the rate design within the TDSIC Rider mechanism. A hearing at the IURC was held in February 2015. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


281


5 .   EFFECTS OF REGULATION

Regulated Generating Units to be Retired Before or During 2016

The following regulated generating units are probable of abandonment.  Accordingly, CWIP and Plant in Service has been reclassified as Other Property, Plant and Equipment on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 .  The following table summarizes the plant investment and cost of removal, currently being recovered, for each generating unit as of December 31, 2014 .
Plant Name and Unit
 
Company
 
Gross Investment
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Net Investment
 
Cost of Removal Regulatory Liability
 
Expected Retirement Date
 
Remaining Recovery Period
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
Tanners Creek Plant, Units 1-4
 
I&M
 
$
711,034

 
$
383,643

 
$
327,391

 
$
89,333

 
2015
 
16 years
Northeastern Station, Unit 4
 
PSO
 
182,138

 
90,925

 
91,213

 
11,189

 
2016
 
26 years
Welsh Plant, Unit 2
 
SWEPCo
 
175,217

 
95,828

 
79,389

 
19,536

 
2016
 
26 years
Total
 
 
 
$
1,068,389

 
$
570,396

 
$
497,993

 
$
120,058

 
 
 
 

In accordance with accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations,” APCo regulated generating units expected to be retired before or during 2016 are not considered probable of abandonment.

282



Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets and liabilities are comprised of the following items:
 
 
APCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
Regulatory Assets:
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs - earns a return
 
$
60,726

 
$
39,811

 
1 year
Under-recovered Fuel Costs - does not earn a return
 
5,350

 

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$
66,076

 
$
39,811

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vegetation Management Program - West Virginia
 
$
19,089

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Storm Related Costs - West Virginia
 
65,206

 
65,206

 
 
Carbon Capture and Storage Product Validation Facility - West Virginia, FERC
 
13,264

 
13,264

 
 
IGCC Pre-Construction Costs - West Virginia, FERC
 
10,838

 

 
 
Demand Response Program Costs - Virginia
 
8,791

 
5,012

 
 
Expanded Net Energy Charge - Coal Inventory
 
3,421

 
20,528

 
 
Expanded Net Energy Charge - Construction Surcharge
 
2,307

 

 
 
Amos Plant Transfer Costs - West Virginia
 
1,377

 

 
 
Carbon Capture and Storage Commercial Scale Facility - West Virginia, FERC
 
1,287

 
1,287

 
 
Transmission Agreement Phase-In - West Virginia
 

 
3,313

 
 
Environmental Rate Adjustment Clause - Virginia
 

 
2,440

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
168

 
168

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
125,748

 
111,218

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Storm Related Costs - Virginia
 
12,963

 
17,167

 
4 years
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
11,067

 
11,622

 
28 years
RTO Formation/Integration Costs
 
2,498

 
3,473

 
5 years
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 

 
665

 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes, Net
 
381,707

 
531,302

 
24 years
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
212,485

 
192,464

 
13 years
Virginia Transmission Rate Adjustment Clause
 
53,164

 
47,322

 
2 years
Postemployment Benefits
 
17,760

 
19,772

 
4 years
Storm Related Costs - West Virginia
 
8,488

 
11,100

 
4 years
Deferred Restructuring Costs - West Virginia
 
6,519

 
8,525

 
4 years
Medicare Subsidy - West Virginia, FERC
 
5,888

 
6,477

 
10 years
Asset Retirement Obligation
 
4,418

 
6,453

 
3 years
Unrealized Loss on Forward Commitments
 
4,081

 
4

 
3 years
Virginia Generation Rate Adjustment Clause
 
3,832

 
6,491

 
1 year
Virginia Environmental Rate Adjustment Clause
 
3,304

 
27,426

 
1 year
Transmission Agreement Phase-In
 
2,875

 

 
3 years
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
1,075

 
2,409

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
732,124

 
892,672

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
$
857,872

 
$
1,003,890

 
 

283


 
 
APCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Refund
Period
Regulatory Liabilities:
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Over-recovered Fuel Costs - does not pay a return
 
$

 
$
107,048

 

Total Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
$

 
$
107,048

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities pending final regulatory determination:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expanded Net Energy Charge - Construction Surcharge
 
$
5,383

 
$

 
 
Over-Recovered Deferred Wind Power Costs - Virginia
 
4,498

 

 
 
Felman Special Rate Mechanism - West Virginia
 
2,152

 

 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 

 
249

 
 
Total Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
12,033

 
249

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
617,267

 
583,723

 
(a)
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
1,312

 
1,863

 
46 years
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized Gain on Forward Commitments
 
19,660

 
15,853

 
3 years
Over-Recovered Customer Rate Relief - West Virginia
 
2,570

 
413

 
1 year
Deferred State Income Tax Coal Credits - Virginia
 

 
28,255

 

Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
25

 
869

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
640,834

 
630,976

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
652,867

 
$
631,225

 
 

(a)
Relieved as removal costs are incurred.

284


 
 
I&M
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
Regulatory Assets:
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs -   earns a return
 
$
773

 
$

 
1 year
Under-recovered Fuel Costs -   does not earn a return
 

 
3,397

 
 
Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$
773

 
$
3,397

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cook Plant Turbine
 
$
6,596

 
$
3,452

 
 
Stranded Costs on Abandoned Plants
 
3,897

 
3,896

 
 
Deferred Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project Costs - Michigan
 
1,222

 
164

 
 
Storm Related Costs - Indiana
 
1,074

 
1,836

 
 
Under-Recovered Capacity Costs - Indiana
 

 
21,945

 
 
Deferred Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project Costs - Indiana
 

 
4,093

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
860

 

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
13,649

 
35,386

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
13,272

 
21,508

 
18 years
Cook Plant, Unit 2 Baffle Bolts - Indiana
 
6,949

 
7,248

 
24 years
RTO Formation/Integration Costs
 
1,801

 
2,544

 
5 years
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
764

 
522

 
various
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes, Net
 
255,002

 
250,478

 
28 years
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
107,857

 
100,132

 
13 years
Cook Plant Nuclear Refueling Outage Levelization
 
38,012

 
57,979

 
2 years
Under-Recovered Capacity Costs - Indiana
 
25,053

 

 
1 year
Under-Recovered PJM Expense - Indiana
 
21,872

 

 
2 years
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
16,616

 
4,457

 
2 years
Medicare Subsidy
 
10,201

 
11,221

 
10 years
Postemployment Benefits
 
9,999

 
9,096

 
4 years
Litigation Settlement
 
9,468

 
10,382

 
11 years
Deferred Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project Costs - Indiana
 
2,162

 

 
5 years
Deferred Restructuring Costs - Michigan
 
1,159

 
2,423

 
1 year
Off-system Sales Margin Sharing
 

 
4,409

 

River Transportation Division Expenses
 

 
4,090

 

Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
2,316

 
2,239

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
522,503

 
488,728

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
$
536,152

 
$
524,114

 
 


285


 
 
I&M
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Refund
Period
Regulatory Liabilities:
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Over-recovered Fuel Costs - does not pay a return
 
$
7,142

 
$

 
1 year
Over-recovered Fuel Costs - pays a return
 

 
1,976

 
 
Total Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
$
7,142

 
$
1,976

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities pending final regulatory determination:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
$
102

 
$
113

 
 
Total Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
102

 
113

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
378,471

 
389,025

 
(a)
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excess Asset Retirement Obligations for Nuclear Decommissioning Liability
 
694,856

 
597,113

 
(b)
Spent Nuclear Fuel Liability
 
43,519

 
43,416

 
(b)
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
38,323

 
43,200

 
22 years
Unrealized Gain on Forward Commitments
 
19,646

 
10,810

 
3 years
Off-system Sales Margin Sharing - Indiana
 
19,409

 

 
2 years
Over-Recovered River Transportation Division Expenses
 
5,347

 

 
1 year
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 

 
15,021

 

Over-Recovered PJM Expense
 

 
13,924

 

Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
21

 
23

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
1,199,592

 
1,112,532

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
1,199,694

 
$
1,112,645

 
 

(a)
Relieved as removal costs are incurred.
(b)
Relieved when plant is decommissioned.


286


 
 
OPCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
Regulatory Assets:
 
2014

2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs - does not earn a return
 
$

 
$
15,829

 

Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$

 
$
15,829

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio Economic Development Rider
 
$

 
$
13,854

 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ormet Special Rate Recovery Mechanism
 
10,483

 
35,631

 
 
Storm Related Costs
 

 
57,589

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
10,483

 
107,074

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio Capacity Deferral
 
422,120

 
288,060

 
4 years
Ohio Fuel Adjustment Clause
 
377,500

 
444,959

 
4 years
Ohio Distribution Decoupling
 
35,069

 
31,329

 
2 years
Ohio Transmission Cost Recovery Rider
 
27,894

 
86,621

 
2 years
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
11,694

 
13,033

 
24 years
Ohio Economic Development Rider
 
4,129

 
791

 
1 year
RTO Formation/Integration Costs
 
3,740

 
5,232

 
5 years
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
195,422

 
188,722

 
13 years
Income Taxes, Net
 
137,462

 
150,183

 
27 years
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
29,067

 
18,529

 
2 years
Under-Recovered gridSMART ®  Costs
 
15,891

 
8,396

 
2 years
Storm Related Costs
 
15,215

 

 
1 year
Medicare Subsidy
 
10,322

 
11,354

 
10 years
Under-Recovered Distribution Investment Rider
 
9,873

 
8,677

 
2 years
Enhanced Service Reliability Plan
 
6,504

 
6,836

 
2 years
Postemployment Benefits
 
6,139

 
6,198

 
4 years
Partnership with Ohio Contribution
 
415

 
1,410

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 

 
1,293

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
1,308,456

 
1,271,623

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
$
1,318,939

 
$
1,378,697

 
 

287


 
 
OPCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Refund
Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Regulatory Liabilities:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Over-recovered Fuel Costs - does not pay a return
 
$
46,264

 
$

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
$
46,264

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities pending final regulatory determination:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
IGCC Preconstruction Costs
 
$

 
$
4,782

 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for Regulatory Loss
 
35,172

 

 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
439

 
216

 
 
Total Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
35,611

 
4,998

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
423,218

 
421,061

 
(a)
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
67

 
165

 
7 years
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized Gain on Forward Commitments
 
47,287

 
2,920

 
18 years
Deferred Asset Phase-In Rider
 
7,121

 
4,334

 
6 years
Low Income Customers/Economic Recovery
 
1,307

 
1,724

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
80

 
297

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
479,080

 
430,501

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
514,691

 
$
435,499

 
 

(a)    Relieved as removal costs are incurred.

288


 
 
PSO
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Regulatory Assets:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs -   earns a return
 
$
35,699

 
$
3,298

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$
35,699

 
$
3,298

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Storm Related Costs
 
$
16,614

 
$
18,743

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
1,079

 
845

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
17,693

 
19,588

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Red Rock Generating Facility
 
9,502

 
9,728

 
42 years
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
7,987

 
9,455

 
19 years
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
89,648

 
77,171

 
13 years
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
9,162

 
11,333

 
2 years
Deferred System Reliability Rider Expenses
 
8,296

 

 
1 year
Medicare Subsidy
 
4,899

 
5,389

 
10 years
Vegetation Management
 
2,898

 
13,963

 
1 year
Income Taxes, Net
 
1,937

 
88

 
35 years
Deferral of Major Generation Overhauls
 
1,333

 
2,933

 
3 years
Base Load Purchase Power Contract
 

 
6,400

 

Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
972

 
642

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
136,634

 
137,102

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
$
154,327

 
$
156,690

 
 



289


 
 
PSO
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Refund
Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Regulatory Liabilities:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities pending final regulatory determination:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Over-recovery of Costs Related to Advanced Metering
 
$
3,942

 
$
2,635

 
 
Other Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
248

 
248

 
 
Total Regulatory Liabilities Pending Final Regulatory Determination
 
4,190

 
2,883

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
275,415

 
276,418

 
(a)
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
46,928

 
46,753

 
50 years
Base Load Purchase Power Contract
 
6,087

 

 
1 year
Over-Recovered Base Plan Funding Costs
 
1,393

 

 
2 years
Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
466

 
1,619

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
330,289

 
324,790

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
334,479

 
$
327,673

 
 

(a)
Relieved as removal costs are incurred.


290


 
 
SWEPCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Recovery
Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Regulatory Assets:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under-recovered Fuel Costs - earns a return
 
$
24,024

 
$
17,949

 
1 year
Total Current Regulatory Assets
 
$
24,024

 
$
17,949

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets pending final regulatory approval:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate Case Expense
 
$
8,126

 
$
7,934

 
 
Shipe Road Transmission Project
 
2,287

 

 
 
Carbon Capture and Storage Commercial Scale Facility
 
440

 
1,143

 
 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
1,262

 
1,951

 
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval
 
12,115

 
11,028

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory assets approved for recovery:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
 
6,952

 
8,165

 
29 years
Acquisition of Valley Electric Membership Corporation (VEMCO)
 
1,756

 
4,100

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
68

 

 
various
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes, Net
 
254,856

 
247,827

 
31 years
Pension and OPEB Funded Status
 
99,920

 
89,672

 
13 years
Medicare Subsidy
 
5,333

 
5,866

 
10 years
Deferred Restructuring Costs - Louisiana
 
5,129

 

 
4 years
Vegetation Management Program - Louisiana
 
2,522

 

 
1 year
Peak Demand Reduction/Energy Efficiency
 
2,176

 
2,584

 
2 years
Unrealized Loss on Forward Commitments
 
1,144

 
3

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
1,631

 
660

 
various
Total Regulatory Assets Approved for Recovery
 
381,487

 
358,877

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (a)
 
$
393,602

 
$
369,905

 
 

(a)
Additionally, as of December 31, 2013, SWEPCo has recorded approximately $42 million in Customer Accounts Receivable on the balance sheet to reflect revenues, retroactive to January 2013, resulting from the PUCT decision in the Texas Base Rate Case.  The majority of these amounts were collected through a rider that was billed to customers.


291


 
 
SWEPCo
 
 
December 31,
 
Remaining
Refund
Period
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Regulatory Liabilities:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Over-recovered Fuel Costs - pays a return
 
$

 
$
7,275

 

Total Current Regulatory Liabilities
 
$

 
$
7,275

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory liabilities approved for payment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Removal Costs
 
$
384,268

 
$
372,381

 
(a)
Refundable Construction Financing Costs - Louisiana
 
58,177

 
77,664

 
4 years
Excess Earnings - Texas
 
2,831

 
2,903

 
39 years
Over-Recovered Generation Recovery Rider Costs - Arkansas
 
1,724

 
1,254

 
2 years
Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 

 
32

 
various
Regulatory Liabilities Currently Not Paying a Return
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
9,831

 
11,207

 
16 years
Vegetation Management Program - Texas
 
556

 
4,002

 
1 year
Other Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
1,143

 
2,685

 
various
Total Regulatory Liabilities Approved for Payment
 
458,530

 
472,128

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
$
458,530

 
$
472,128

 
 

(a)
Relieved as removal costs are incurred.


292


6 .   COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES

The Registrant Subsidiaries are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in their ordinary course of business.  In addition, their business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment.  The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation cannot be predicted.  For current proceedings not specifically discussed below, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such proceedings would have a material effect on the financial statements.

COMMITMENTS

Construction and Commitments – Affecting APCo,  I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The Registrant Subsidiaries have substantial construction commitments to support their operations and environmental investments.  In managing the overall construction program and in the normal course of business, the Registrant Subsidiaries contractually commit to third-party construction vendors for certain material purchases and other construction services.  
 
The Registrant Subsidiaries also purchase fuel, materials, supplies, services and property, plant and equipment under contract as part of their normal course of business.  Certain supply contracts contain penalty provisions for early termination.

The following tables summarize the Registrant Subsidiaries’ actual contractual commitments as of December 31, 2014 :
Contractual Commitments - APCo
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in thousands)
Fuel Purchase Contracts (a)
 
$
499,262

 
$
568,842

 
$
482,135

 
$
479,243

 
$
2,029,482

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
32,584

 
66,454

 
70,306

 
502,176

 
671,520

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
41,043

 

 

 

 
41,043

Total
 
$
572,889

 
$
635,296

 
$
552,441

 
$
981,419

 
$
2,742,045

Contractual Commitments - I&M
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in thousands)
Fuel Purchase Contracts (a)
 
$
369,768

 
$
443,603

 
$
247,902

 
$
443,053

 
$
1,504,326

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
111,138

 
225,965

 
242,359

 
755,621

 
1,335,083

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
11,316

 

 

 

 
11,316

Total
 
$
492,222

 
$
669,568

 
$
490,261

 
$
1,198,674

 
$
2,850,725

Contractual Commitments - OPCo
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in thousands)
Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
$
208,622

 
$
57,146

 
$
60,635

 
$
513,136

 
$
839,539

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
10,002

 

 

 

 
10,002

Total
 
$
218,624

 
$
57,146

 
$
60,635

 
$
513,136

 
$
849,541

Contractual Commitments - PSO
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in thousands)
Fuel Purchase Contracts (a)
 
$
165,303

 
$
187,904

 
$
94,800

 
$
142,200

 
$
590,207

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
71,137

 
163,753

 
171,067

 
390,679

 
796,636

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
1,540

 

 

 

 
1,540

Total
 
$
237,980

 
$
351,657

 
$
265,867

 
$
532,879

 
$
1,388,383


293


Contractual Commitments - SWEPCo
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
2-3 Years
 
4-5 Years
 
After
5 Years
 
Total
 
 
(in thousands)
Fuel Purchase Contracts (a)
 
$
286,428

 
$
309,213

 
$
155,327

 
$
187,548

 
$
938,516

Energy and Capacity Purchase Contracts
 
19,798

 
56,582

 
62,240

 
216,311

 
354,931

Construction Contracts for Capital Assets (b)
 
18,284

 

 

 

 
18,284

Total
 
$
324,510

 
$
365,795

 
$
217,567

 
$
403,859

 
$
1,311,731


(a)
Represents contractual commitments to purchase coal, natural gas, uranium and other consumables as fuel for electric generation along with related transportation of the fuel.
(b)
Represents only capital assets for which there are signed contracts.  Actual payments are dependent upon and may vary significantly based upon the decision to build, regulatory approval schedules, timing and escalation of project costs.

GUARANTEES

Liabilities for guarantees are recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Guarantees.”  There is no collateral held in relation to any guarantees.  In the event any guarantee is drawn, there is no recourse to third parties unless specified below.

Letters of Credit – Affecting APCo, I&M and OPCo

Certain Registrant Subsidiaries enter into standby letters of credit with third parties.  These letters of credit are issued in the ordinary course of business and cover items such as insurance programs, security deposits and debt service reserves.

AEP has two revolving credit facilities totaling $3.5 billion , under which up to $1.2 billion may be issued as letters of credit.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum future payments for letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facilities were as follows:
Company
 
Amount
 
Maturity
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
I&M
 
$
150

 
March 2015
OPCo
 
4,200

 
June 2015

The Registrant Subsidiaries have $307 million of variable rate Pollution Control Bonds supported by bilateral letters of credit for $310 million as follows:
Company
 
Pollution
Control Bonds
 
Bilateral Letters
of Credit
 
Maturity of Bilateral Letters of Credit
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
APCo
 
$
229,650

 
$
232,293

 
March 2016 to March 2017
I&M
 
77,000

 
77,886

 
March 2015 (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) In February 2015, maturity dates were extended to March 2017.

Guarantees of Third-Party Obligations – Affecting SWEPCo

As part of the process to receive a renewal of a Texas Railroad Commission permit for lignite mining, SWEPCo provides guarantees of mine reclamation of $115 million .  Since SWEPCo uses self-bonding, the guarantee provides for SWEPCo to commit to use its resources to complete the reclamation in the event the work is not completed by Sabine.  This guarantee ends upon depletion of reserves and completion of final reclamation.  Based on the latest study completed in 2010, it is estimated the reserves will be depleted in 2036 with final reclamation completed by 2046 at an estimated cost of approximately $58 million .  Actual reclamation costs could vary due to period inflation and any

294


changes to actual mine reclamation.  As of December 31, 2014 , SWEPCo has collected approximately $64 million through a rider for final mine closure and reclamation costs, of which $16 million is recorded in Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities and $48 million is recorded in Asset Retirement Obligations on SWEPCo’s balance sheet.

Sabine charges SWEPCo, its only customer, all of its costs.  SWEPCo passes these costs to customers through its fuel clause.
 
Indemnifications and Other Guarantees – Affecting APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

Contracts

The Registrant Subsidiaries enter into certain types of contracts which require indemnifications.  Typically these contracts include, but are not limited to, sale agreements, lease agreements, purchase agreements and financing agreements.  Generally, these agreements may include, but are not limited to, indemnifications around certain tax, contractual and environmental matters.  With respect to sale agreements, exposure generally does not exceed the sale price.  As of December 31, 2014 , there were no material liabilities recorded for any indemnifications.

APCo, I&M and OPCo are jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of AEP companies related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.  PSO and SWEPCo are jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of PSO and SWEPCo related to power purchase and sale activity pursuant to the SIA.

Lease Obligations

Certain Registrant Subsidiaries lease certain equipment under master lease agreements.  See “Master Lease Agreements” and “Railcar Lease” sections of Note 13 for disclosure of lease residual value guarantees.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTINGENCIES
 
The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) and State Remediation – Affecting APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

By-products from the generation of electricity include materials such as ash, slag, sludge, low-level radioactive waste and SNF.  Coal combustion by-products, which constitute the overwhelming percentage of these materials, are typically treated and deposited in captive disposal facilities or are beneficially utilized.  In addition, the generation plants and transmission and distribution facilities have used asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and other hazardous and nonhazardous materials.  The Registrant Subsidiaries currently incur costs to dispose of these substances safely.

Superfund addresses clean-up of hazardous substances that have been released to the environment.  The Federal EPA administers the clean-up programs.  Several states have enacted similar laws.  As of December 31, 2014 , APCo and OPCo are named as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) for one site and three sites, respectively, by the Federal EPA.  There are seven additional sites for which APCo, I&M, OPCo and SWEPCo have received information requests which could lead to PRP designation.  I&M has also been named potentially liable at two sites under state law including the I&M site discussed in the next paragraph.  SWEPCo has also been named potentially liable at one site under state law.  In those instances where the Registrant Subsidiaries have been named a PRP or defendant, disposal or recycling activities were in accordance with the then-applicable laws and regulations.  Superfund does not recognize compliance as a defense, but imposes strict liability on parties who fall within its broad statutory categories.  Liability has been resolved for a number of sites with no significant effect on net income.

In 2008, I&M received a letter from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) concerning conditions at a site under state law and requesting I&M take voluntary action necessary to prevent and/or mitigate public harm.  I&M started remediation work in accordance with a plan approved by MDEQ.    In September 2014, I&M recorded an accrual for remediation at certain additional sites in Michigan. As of December 31, 2014 , I&M’s accrual

295


for all of these sites is approximately $15 million .  As the remediation work is completed, I&M’s cost may change as new information becomes available concerning either the level of contamination at the site or changes in the scope of remediation.  Management cannot predict the amount of additional cost, if any.

Management evaluates the potential liability for each Superfund site separately, but several general statements can be made about potential future liability.  Allegations that materials were disposed at a particular site are often unsubstantiated and the quantity of materials deposited at a site can be small and often nonhazardous.  Although Superfund liability has been interpreted by the courts as joint and several, typically many parties are named as PRPs for each site and several of the parties are financially sound enterprises.  At present, management’s estimates do not anticipate material cleanup costs for identified Superfund sites, except the I&M sites discussed above.
 
NUCLEAR CONTINGENCIES – AFFECTING I&M

I&M owns and operates the two-unit 2,191MW Cook Plant under licenses granted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).  I&M has a significant future financial commitment to dispose of SNF and to safely decommission and decontaminate the plant.  The licenses to operate the two nuclear units at the Cook Plant expire in 2034 and 2037.  The operation of a nuclear facility also involves special risks, potential liabilities and specific regulatory and safety requirements.  By agreement, I&M is partially liable, together with all other electric utility companies that own nuclear generating units, for a nuclear power plant incident at any nuclear plant in the U.S.  Should a nuclear incident occur at any nuclear power plant in the U.S., the liability could be substantial.

Decommissioning and Low Level Waste Accumulation Disposal

The cost to decommission a nuclear plant is affected by NRC regulations and the SNF disposal program.  Decommissioning costs are accrued over the service life of the Cook Plant.  The most recent decommissioning cost study was performed in 2012.  According to that study, the estimated cost of decommissioning and disposal of low-level radioactive waste ranges from $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion in 2012 nondiscounted dollars.  The wide range in estimated costs is caused by variables in assumptions.  I&M recovers estimated decommissioning costs for the Cook Plant in its rates.  The amounts recovered in rates were $9 million , $10 million and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Decommissioning costs recovered from customers are deposited in external trusts.
 
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the total decommissioning trust fund balance was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion , respectively.  Trust fund earnings increase the fund assets and decrease the amount remaining to be recovered from ratepayers.  The decommissioning costs (including interest, unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the trust funds) increase or decrease the recorded liability.

I&M continues to work with regulators and customers to recover the remaining estimated costs of decommissioning the Cook Plant.  However, future net income and cash flows would be reduced and financial condition could be impacted if the cost of SNF disposal and decommissioning continues to increase and cannot be recovered.

SNF Disposal

The federal government is responsible for permanent SNF disposal and assesses fees to nuclear plant owners for SNF disposal.  A fee of one mill per KWh for fuel consumed after April 6, 1983 at the Cook Plant is being collected from customers and remitted to the U.S. Treasury.  This fee was terminated in May 2014. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , fees and related interest of $266 million and $265 million , respectively, for fuel consumed prior to April 7, 1983 have been recorded as Long-term Debt and funds collected from customers along with related earnings totaling $309 million and $309 million , respectively, to pay the fee are recorded as part of Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts.  I&M has not paid the government the pre-April 1983 fees due to continued delays and uncertainties related to the federal disposal program.


296


In 2011, I&M signed a settlement agreement with the federal government which permits I&M to make annual filings to recover certain SNF storage costs incurred as a result of the government’s delays in accepting SNF for permanent storage.  Under the settlement agreement, I&M received $22 million , $31 million and $20 million in 2014 , 2013 and 2012, respectively, to recover costs and will be eligible to receive additional payment of annual claims for allowed costs that are incurred through December 31, 2016.  The proceeds reduced costs for dry cask storage.  As of December 31, 2014 , I&M has deferred $13 million in Prepayments and Other Current Assets and $2 million in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on the balance sheet of dry cask storage and related operation and maintenance costs for recovery under this agreement.

See “Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal” section of Note 11 for disclosure of the fair value of assets within the trusts.

Nuclear Incident Liability

I&M carries insurance coverage for a nuclear incident at the Cook Plant for property damage, decommissioning and decontamination in the amount of $2.8 billion .  Insurance coverage for a nonnuclear incident at the Cook Plant is $1.7 billion .  Additional insurance provides coverage for a weekly indemnity payment resulting from an insured accidental outage.  I&M utilizes industry mutual insurers for the placement of this insurance coverage.  Participation in this mutual insurance requires a contingent financial obligation of up to $44 million for I&M which is assessable if the insurer’s financial resources would be inadequate to pay for losses.

The Price-Anderson Act, extended through December 31, 2025, establishes insurance protection for public liability arising from a nuclear incident at $13.6 billion and covers any incident at a licensed reactor in the U.S.  Commercially available insurance, which must be carried for each licensed reactor, provides $375 million of coverage.  In the event of a nuclear incident at any nuclear plant in the U.S., the remainder of the liability would be provided by a deferred premium assessment of $121 million on each licensed reactor in the U.S. payable in annual installments of $19 million .  As a result, I&M could be assessed $242 million per nuclear incident payable in annual installments of $38 million .  The number of incidents for which payments could be required is not limited.

In the event of an incident of a catastrophic nature, I&M is initially covered for the first $375 million through commercially available insurance.  The next level of liability coverage of up to $13.2 billion would be covered by claims made under the Price-Anderson Act.  If the liability were in excess of amounts recoverable from insurance and retrospective claim payments made under the Price-Anderson Act, I&M would seek to recover those amounts from customers through rate increases.  In the event nuclear losses or liabilities are underinsured or exceed accumulated funds and recovery from customers is not possible, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.
 
OPERATIONAL CONTINGENCIES

Insurance and Potential Losses – Affecting APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The Registrant Subsidiaries maintain insurance coverage normal and customary for electric utilities, subject to various deductibles.  The Registrant Subsidiaries also maintain property and casualty insurance that may cover certain physical damage or third-party injuries caused by cyber security incidents. Insurance coverage includes all risks of physical loss or damage to nonnuclear assets, subject to insurance policy conditions and exclusions.  Covered property generally includes power plants, substations, facilities and inventories.  Excluded property generally includes transmission and distribution lines, poles and towers.  The insurance programs also generally provide coverage against loss arising from certain claims made by third parties and are in excess of retentions absorbed by the Registrant Subsidiaries.  Coverage is generally provided by a combination of the protected cell of EIS and/or various industry mutual and/or commercial insurance carriers.

See “Nuclear Contingencies” section of this footnote for a discussion of I&M’s nuclear exposures and related insurance.


297


Some potential losses or liabilities may not be insurable or the amount of insurance carried may not be sufficient to meet potential losses and liabilities, including, but not limited to, liabilities relating to a cyber security incident or damage to the Cook Plant and costs of replacement power in the event of an incident at the Cook Plant.  Future losses or liabilities, if they occur, which are not completely insured, unless recovered from customers, could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Rockport Plant Litigation – Affecting I&M

In July 2013, the Wilmington Trust Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against AEGCo and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened by the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiff further alleges that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiff.  The New York court has granted the motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M. In January 2015, the court issued an opinion and order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. The court dismissed certain of the plaintiffs’ claims. Several claims remain, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.   Management will continue to defend against the remaining claims.  Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

Wage and Hours Lawsuit – Affecting PSO

In August 2013, PSO received an amended complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma by 36 current and former line and warehouse employees alleging that they have been denied overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.  Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to overtime pay for “on call” time. They allege that restrictions placed on them during on call hours are burdensome enough that they are entitled to compensation for these hours as hours worked.  Plaintiffs also filed a motion to conditionally certify this action as a class action, claiming there are an additional 70 individuals similarly situated to plaintiffs.  Plaintiffs seek damages in the amount of unpaid overtime over a three-year period and liquidated damages in the same amount.

In March 2014, the federal court granted plaintiffs’ motion to conditionally certify the action as a class action.  Notice was given to all potential class members and an additional 44 individuals opted in to the class, bringing the plaintiff class to 80 current and former employees. Management will continue to defend the case. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

Gavin Landfill Litigation – Affecting OPCo
In August 2014, a complaint was filed in the Mason County, West Virginia Circuit Court against AEP, AEPSC, OPCo and an individual supervisor alleging wrongful death and personal injury/illness claims arising out of purported exposure to coal combustion by-product waste at the Gavin Plant landfill.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 77 plaintiffs, consisting of 39 current and former contractors of the landfill and 38 family members of those contractors.  Eleven of the family members are pursuing personal injury/illness claims and the remainder are pursuing loss of consortium claims.  The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as medical monitoring.  In September 2014, management filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending the case should be filed in Ohio.  That motion is pending.  Management will continue to defend against the claims.  Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that are reasonably possible of occurring.

298


7 .   DISPOSITION AND IMPAIRMENTS

DISPOSITION

2013

Conesville Coal Preparation Company – Affecting OPCo

In April 2013, OPCo closed on the sale of its Conesville Coal Preparation Company.  This sale did not have a significant impact on OPCo’s financial statements.
 
IMPAIRMENTS

2013

Amos Plant, Unit 3 – Affecting APCo

In July 2013, the Virginia SCC approved the transfer of OPCo’s two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo but, for rate purposes, reduced the proposed transfer price by $83 million pretax.  The Virginia jurisdictional share of the reduced price is approximately $39 million .  In December 2013, the WVPSC issued an order that approved the transfer of OPCo’s two-thirds interest in the Amos Plant, Unit 3 to APCo but deferred a final decision related to the $83 million pretax reduction in transfer price until APCo’s next base rate case.  The West Virginia and FERC jurisdictional share of the potential reduced transfer price is approximately $44 million .  Upon evaluation, management believes the West Virginia jurisdictional share is probable of recovery.  As a result of the Virginia order, in the fourth quarter of 2013, management recorded a pretax impairment of $39 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income.  

Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 – Affecting OPCo

In May 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio approved a modification to the consent decree, which was initially entered into in 2007, requiring certain types of pollution control equipment to be installed at certain AEP plants, including OPCo’s 600MW Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (MR5) coal-fired generation plant.  Under the modification to the consent decree, OPCo has the option to cease burning coal and retire MR5 in 2015 or to cease burning coal in 2015 and complete a natural gas refueling project no later than June 2017.  In the second quarter of 2013, based on the approval of the modified consent decree and changes in other market factors, management re-evaluated potential courses of action with respect to the planned operation of MR5 and concluded that completion of a refueling project, which would have extended the useful life of MR5, is remote.  As a result, management completed an impairment analysis and concluded that MR5 was impaired.  Under a market-based value approach, using level 3 unobservable inputs, management determined that the fair value of this generating unit was zero based on the lack of installed environmental control equipment and the nature and condition of this generating unit.  In the second quarter of 2013, OPCo recorded a pretax impairment of $154 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income which includes a $6 million pretax impairment of related material and supplies inventory.  Management expects to retire the plant in 2015.


299


2012

Beckjord Plant, Unit 6, Conesville Plant, Unit 3, Kammer Plant, Units 1-3, Muskingum River Plant, Units 1-4, Sporn Plant, Units 2 and 4 and Picway Plant, Unit 5 – Affecting OPCo

In October 2012, management filed applications with the FERC proposing to terminate the Interconnection Agreement and seeking to complete the corporate separation of OPCo's generation assets.  Based on the intention to terminate the Interconnection Agreement and the FERC filing, management performed an evaluation of the recoverability of generation assets.  As a result, in November 2012, management, using generating unit specific estimated future cash flows, concluded that OPCo had a material impairment of certain generation assets.  Under a market-based value approach, using level 3 unobservable inputs, management determined that the fair value of these generating units was zero based on the lack of installed environmental control equipment and the nature and condition of these generating units.  In the fourth quarter of 2012, OPCo recorded a pretax impairment of $287 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income related to Beckjord Plant, Unit 6, Conesville Plant, Unit 3, Kammer Plant, Units 1-3, Muskingum River Plant, Units 1-4, Sporn Plant, Units 2 and 4 and Picway Plant, Unit 5 generating units which includes $13 million of related material and supplies inventory.
 
Turk Plant – Affecting SWEPCo

In 2012, SWEPCo recorded a pretax write-off of $13 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of income related to unrecoverable construction costs subject to the Texas capital costs cap portion of the Turk Plant.


300


8 .   BENEFIT PLANS

For a discussion of investment strategy, investment limitations, target asset allocations and the classification of investments within the fair value hierarchy, see “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” and “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” sections of Note 1 .

The Registrant Subsidiaries participate in an AEP sponsored qualified pension plan and two unfunded nonqualified pension plans.  Substantially all employees are covered by the qualified plan or both the qualified and a nonqualified pension plan.  The Registrant Subsidiaries also participate in OPEB plans sponsored by AEP to provide health and life insurance benefits for retired employees.

Due to the Registrant Subsidiaries’ participation in AEP’s benefits plans, the assumptions used by the actuary and the accounting for the plans by each subsidiary are the same.  This section details the assumptions that apply to all Registrant Subsidiaries and the rate of compensation increase for each subsidiary.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize the funded status associated with defined benefit pension and OPEB plans in their balance sheets.  Disclosures about the plans are required by the “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” accounting guidance.  The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, and recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income, the changes in the funded status of the plan that arise during the year that are not recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost.  The Registrant Subsidiaries record a regulatory asset instead of other comprehensive income for qualifying benefit costs of regulated operations that for ratemaking purposes are deferred for future recovery.  The cumulative funded status adjustment is equal to the remaining unrecognized deferrals for unamortized actuarial losses or gains, prior service costs and transition obligations, such that remaining deferred costs result in an AOCI equity reduction or regulatory asset and deferred gains result in an AOCI equity addition or regulatory liability.
 
Actuarial Assumptions for Benefit Obligations

The weighted-average assumptions as of December 31 of each year used in the measurement of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ benefit obligations are shown in the following tables:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Assumption
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Discount Rate
 
4.00
%
 
4.70
%
 
4.00
%
 
4.70
%
 
 
Pension Plans
Assumption  Rate of Compensation Increase (a)
 
2014
 
2013
APCo
 
4.45
%
 
4.60
%
I&M
 
4.80
%
 
4.90
%
OPCo
 
4.80
%
 
5.00
%
PSO
 
4.80
%
 
4.90
%
SWEPCo
 
4.80
%
 
4.85
%

(a)
Rates are for base pay only.  In addition, an amount is added to reflect target incentive compensation for exempt employees and overtime and incentive pay for nonexempt employees.

A duration-based method is used to determine the discount rate for the plans.  A hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds is constructed with cash flows matching the benefit plan liability.  The composite yield on the hypothetical bond portfolio is used as the discount rate for the plan.  The discount rate is the same for each Registrant Subsidiary.


301


For 2014 , the rate of compensation increase assumed varies with the age of the employee, ranging from 3.5% per year to 12% per year, with the average increase shown in the table above.  The compensation increase rates reflect variations in each Registrant Subsidiaries' population participating in the pension plan.

Updated mortality assumptions based on mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014 were used for the December 31, 2014 benefit obligation measurements. These updates resulted in approximate benefit obligation increases by Registrant Subsidiary as shown in the following table:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Increase in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
17,946

 
$
2,271

I&M
 
15,117

 
1,644

OPCo
 
14,525

 
310

PSO
 
6,811

 
555

SWEPCo
 
6,445

 
775


Actuarial Assumptions for Net Periodic Benefit Costs

The weighted-average assumptions as of January 1 of each year used in the measurement of each Registrant Subsidiaries’ benefit costs are shown in the following tables:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Assumptions
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Discount Rate
 
4.70
%
 
3.95
%
 
4.55
%
 
4.70
%
 
3.95
%
 
4.75
%
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
6.00
%
 
6.50
%
 
7.25
%
 
6.75
%
 
7.00
%
 
7.25
%
 
 
Pension Plans
Assumption Rate of Compensation Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
APCo
 
4.60
%
 
4.70
%
 
4.70
%
I&M
 
4.90
%
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
OPCo
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
PSO
 
4.90
%
 
4.90
%
 
4.90
%
SWEPCo
 
4.85
%
 
4.75
%
 
4.75
%

The expected return on plan assets was determined by evaluating historical returns, the current investment climate (yield on fixed income securities and other recent investment market indicators), rate of inflation and current prospects for economic growth.  The expected return on plan assets is the same for each Registrant Subsidiary.
 
The health care trend rate assumptions as of January 1 of each year used for OPEB plans measurement purposes are shown below:
Health Care Trend Rates
 
2014
 
2013
Initial
 
6.50
%
 
6.75
%
Ultimate
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
Year Ultimate Reached
 
2020

 
2020



302


Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the OPEB health care plans.  A 1% change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Effect on Total Service and Interest Cost Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Health Care Benefit Cost:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1% Increase
 
$
902

 
$
343

 
$
308

 
$
158

 
$
179

1% Decrease
 
(691
)
 
(264
)
 
(237
)
 
(121
)
 
(138
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on the Health Care Component of the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1% Increase
 
$
17,260

 
$
7,117

 
$
7,251

 
$
3,377

 
$
3,742

1% Decrease
 
(13,614
)
 
(5,630
)
 
(5,736
)
 
(2,671
)
 
(2,960
)

Significant Concentrations of Risk within Plan Assets

In addition to establishing the target asset allocation of plan assets, the investment policy also places restrictions on securities to limit significant concentrations within plan assets.  The investment policy establishes guidelines that govern maximum market exposure, security restrictions, prohibited asset classes, prohibited types of transactions, minimum credit quality, average portfolio credit quality, portfolio duration and concentration limits.  The guidelines were established to mitigate the risk of loss due to significant concentrations in any investment.  Management monitors the plans to control security diversification and ensure compliance with the investment policy.  As of December 31, 2014 , the assets were invested in compliance with all investment limits.  See “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” section of Note 1 for limit details.

Benefit Plan Obligations, Plan Assets and Funded Status as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets and funded status as of December 31.  The benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans are the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation, respectively.
APCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
663,231

 
$
718,460

 
$
279,884

 
$
348,990

Service Cost
 
7,036

 
6,171

 
1,448

 
2,566

Interest Cost
 
29,624

 
27,662

 
12,788

 
13,454

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
41,671

 
(45,619
)
 
(8,975
)
 
(66,056
)
Benefit Payments
 
(38,757
)
 
(43,443
)
 
(26,584
)
 
(27,220
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
7,196

 
6,600

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
1,391

 
1,550

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
702,805

 
$
663,231

 
$
267,148

 
$
279,884

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
627,995

 
$
621,570

 
$
284,840

 
$
267,758

Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
44,052

 
49,832

 
11,836

 
34,289

Company Contributions
 
8,999

 
36

 
3,345

 
3,413

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
7,196

 
6,600

Benefit Payments
 
(38,757
)
 
(43,443
)
 
(26,584
)
 
(27,220
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
642,289

 
$
627,995

 
$
280,633

 
$
284,840

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(60,516
)
 
$
(35,236
)
 
$
13,485

 
$
4,956


303


I&M
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
574,699

 
$
618,973

 
$
166,497

 
$
218,553

Service Cost
 
10,068

 
8,736

 
1,947

 
3,219

Interest Cost
 
26,293

 
24,100

 
7,638

 
8,221

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
38,466

 
(41,631
)
 
(4,925
)
 
(52,800
)
Benefit Payments
 
(31,578
)
 
(35,479
)
 
(15,730
)
 
(16,613
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
5,168

 
4,745

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
1,064

 
1,172

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
617,948

 
$
574,699

 
$
161,659

 
$
166,497

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
559,143

 
$
552,026

 
$
206,214

 
$
194,128

Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
55,295

 
42,584

 
6,664

 
23,844

Company Contributions
 
8,877

 
12

 
92

 
110

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
5,168

 
4,745

Benefit Payments
 
(31,578
)
 
(35,479
)
 
(15,730
)
 
(16,613
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
591,737

 
$
559,143

 
$
202,408

 
$
206,214

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(26,211
)
 
$
(15,556
)
 
$
40,749

 
$
39,717

OPCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
523,643

 
$
1,068,186

 
$
171,164

 
$
466,290

Transfer of OPCo Generation Benefit Obligation
 

 
(499,725
)
 

 
(250,843
)
Service Cost
 
5,140

 
5,285

 
1,026

 
2,882

Interest Cost
 
22,105

 
21,939

 
7,601

 
9,494

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
6,761

 
(34,373
)
 
(4,286
)
 
(44,149
)
Benefit Payments
 
(31,399
)
 
(37,669
)
 
(17,353
)
 
(18,844
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
5,564

 
5,199

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
981

 
1,135

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
526,250

 
$
523,643

 
$
164,697

 
$
171,164

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
501,634

 
$
1,015,115

 
$
211,994

 
$
366,301

Transfer of OPCo Generation Plan Assets
 

 
(506,076
)
 

 
(170,650
)
Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
21,679

 
30,264

 
6,007

 
29,576

Company Contributions
 
6,547

 

 

 
412

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
5,564

 
5,199

Benefit Payments
 
(31,399
)
 
(37,669
)
 
(17,353
)
 
(18,844
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
498,461

 
$
501,634

 
$
206,212

 
$
211,994

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(27,789
)
 
$
(22,009
)
 
$
41,515

 
$
40,830


304


PSO
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
260,710

 
$
279,685

 
$
77,779

 
$
99,680

Service Cost
 
5,207

 
5,562

 
839

 
1,372

Interest Cost
 
12,057

 
10,993

 
3,574

 
3,793

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
25,708

 
(15,381
)
 
(952
)
 
(22,070
)
Benefit Payments
 
(18,277
)
 
(20,149
)
 
(7,305
)
 
(7,741
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
2,304

 
2,229

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
467

 
516

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
285,405

 
$
260,710

 
$
76,706

 
$
77,779

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
264,597

 
$
264,823

 
$
96,333

 
$
90,521

Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
24,607

 
19,892

 
4,709

 
11,324

Company Contributions
 
4,555

 
31

 

 

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
2,304

 
2,229

Benefit Payments
 
(18,277
)
 
(20,149
)
 
(7,305
)
 
(7,741
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
275,482

 
$
264,597

 
$
96,041

 
$
96,333

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(9,923
)
 
$
3,887

 
$
19,335

 
$
18,554

SWEPCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Change in Benefit Obligation
 
(in thousands)
Benefit Obligation as of January 1,
 
$
270,564

 
$
285,560

 
$
86,997

 
$
109,948

Service Cost
 
6,618

 
7,011

 
1,012

 
1,693

Interest Cost
 
12,651

 
11,454

 
3,992

 
4,301

Actuarial (Gain) Loss
 
27,511

 
(12,818
)
 
(2,296
)
 
(23,852
)
Benefit Payments
 
(19,178
)
 
(20,643
)
 
(7,731
)
 
(8,057
)
Participant Contributions
 

 

 
2,532

 
2,410

Medicare Subsidy
 

 

 
499

 
554

Benefit Obligation as of December 31,
 
$
298,166

 
$
270,564

 
$
85,005

 
$
86,997

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of January 1,
 
$
278,946

 
$
279,699

 
$
107,750

 
$
99,846

Actual Gain on Plan Assets
 
26,482

 
19,823

 
3,881

 
13,551

Company Contributions
 
3,902

 
67

 

 

Participant Contributions
 

 

 
2,532

 
2,410

Benefit Payments
 
(19,178
)
 
(20,643
)
 
(7,731
)
 
(8,057
)
Fair Value of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 
$
290,152

 
$
278,946

 
$
106,432

 
$
107,750

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded (Underfunded) Status as of December 31,
 
$
(8,014
)
 
$
8,382

 
$
21,427

 
$
20,753



305


Amounts Recognized on the Registrant Subsidiaries' Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
APCo
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets  Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$

 
$
56,498

 
$
27,945

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term Benefit Liability
 
(39
)
 
(34
)
 
(2,884
)
 
(2,970
)
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations  Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(60,477
)
 
(35,202
)
 
(40,129
)
 
(20,019
)
Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(60,516
)
 
$
(35,236
)
 
$
13,485

 
$
4,956

 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
I&M
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets  Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$

 
$
40,749

 
$
39,590

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term Benefit Liability
 
(28
)
 
(43
)
 

 

Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities  Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(26,183
)
 
(15,513
)
 

 
127

Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(26,211
)
 
$
(15,556
)
 
$
40,749

 
$
39,717

 
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
OPCo
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets  Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$

 
$
41,515

 
$
39,496

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term Benefit Liability
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 

 

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations  Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(27,788
)
 
(22,008
)
 

 
1,334

Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(27,789
)
 
$
(22,009
)
 
$
41,515

 
$
40,830

 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
PSO
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
Employee Benefits and Pension Assets  Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$
5,280

 
$
19,335

 
$
17,349

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term Benefit Liability
 
(190
)
 
(107
)
 

 

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations  Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(9,733
)
 
(1,286
)
 

 
1,205

Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(9,923
)
 
$
3,887

 
$
19,335

 
$
18,554


306


 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
SWEPCo
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets
Prepaid Benefit Costs
 
$

 
$
9,506

 
$
21,427

 
$
19,210

Other Current Liabilities  Accrued Short-term
Benefit Liability
 
(82
)
 
(79
)
 

 

Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations
Accrued Long-term Benefit Liability
 
(7,932
)
 
(1,045
)
 

 
1,543

Funded (Underfunded) Status
 
$
(8,014
)
 
$
8,382

 
$
21,427

 
$
20,753


Amounts Included in AOCI and Regulatory Assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
APCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
235,000

 
$
220,047

 
$
65,841

 
$
72,732

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
523

 
720

 
(90,626
)
 
(100,676
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
232,815

 
$
217,937

 
$
(20,330
)
 
$
(25,473
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 
948

 
991

 
(1,559
)
 
(865
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 
1,760

 
1,839

 
(2,896
)
 
(1,606
)
I&M
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
137,945

 
$
138,367

 
$
54,444

 
$
54,949

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
510

 
705

 
(85,117
)
 
(94,538
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
134,121

 
$
134,560

 
$
(26,264
)
 
$
(34,428
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 
1,517

 
1,579

 
(1,543
)
 
(1,807
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 
2,817

 
2,933

 
(2,866
)
 
(3,354
)
OPCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
226,755

 
$
227,668

 
$
30,651

 
$
29,804

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
393

 
550

 
(62,377
)
 
(69,300
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
227,148

 
$
228,218

 
$
(31,726
)
 
$
(39,496
)

307


PSO
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
102,641

 
$
93,688

 
$
25,242

 
$
25,712

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
536

 
832

 
(38,771
)
 
(43,061
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
103,177

 
$
94,520

 
$
(13,529
)
 
$
(17,349
)
SWEPCo
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
104,903

 
$
95,492

 
$
32,377

 
$
32,772

Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
655

 
1,004

 
(46,826
)
 
(51,982
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Assets
 
$
105,558

 
$
96,496

 
$
(8,959
)
 
$
(11,836
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 

 

 
(1,921
)
 
(2,580
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 

 

 
(3,569
)
 
(4,794
)

Components of the change in amounts included in AOCI and Regulatory Assets by Registrant Subsidiary during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
Pension Plans  Components
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Actuarial Loss During the Year
 
$
31,546

 
$
14,163

 
$
11,509

 
$
15,706

 
$
16,457

Amortization of Actuarial Loss
 
(16,593
)
 
(14,585
)
 
(12,422
)
 
(6,753
)
 
(7,046
)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
 
(197
)
 
(195
)
 
(157
)
 
(296
)
 
(349
)
Change for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
14,756

 
$
(617
)
 
$
(1,070
)
 
$
8,657

 
$
9,062

Pension Plans  Components
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Actuarial Gain During the Year
 
$
(58,411
)
 
$
(51,388
)
 
$
(253,392
)
 
$
(19,599
)
 
$
(16,133
)
Amortization of Actuarial Loss
 
(25,025
)
 
(21,688
)
 
(19,833
)
 
(9,845
)
 
(10,214
)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
 
(198
)
 
(195
)
 
(157
)
 
(297
)
 
(349
)
Change for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
(83,634
)
 
$
(73,271
)
 
$
(273,382
)
 
$
(29,741
)
 
$
(26,696
)
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Components
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Actuarial (Gain) Loss During the Year
 
$
(2,309
)
 
$
1,863

 
$
3,226

 
$
639

 
$
840

Amortization of Actuarial Loss
 
(4,582
)
 
(2,368
)
 
(2,379
)
 
(1,109
)
 
(1,235
)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
10,050

 
9,421

 
6,923

 
4,290

 
5,156

Change for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
$
3,159

 
$
8,916

 
$
7,770

 
$
3,820

 
$
4,761

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Components
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Actuarial Gain During the Year
 
$
(82,192
)
 
$
(63,460
)
 
$
(111,922
)
 
$
(27,305
)
 
$
(30,523
)
Amortization of Actuarial Loss
 
(12,249
)
 
(7,526
)
 
(8,633
)
 
(3,476
)
 
(3,928
)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
10,050

 
9,421

 
6,962

 
4,289

 
5,156

Change for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
$
(84,391
)
 
$
(61,565
)
 
$
(113,593
)
 
$
(26,492
)
 
$
(29,295
)


308


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Plans’ Assets

The following tables present the classification of pension plan assets within the fair value hierarchy by Registrant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2014 :
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
76,107

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
76,107

 
11.9
 %
International
 
64,930

 

 

 

 
64,930

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
1,822

 

 

 
1,822

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
7,019

 

 

 

 
7,019

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust – Global
 

 
48,751

 

 

 
48,751

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust – International
 

 
2,390

 

 

 
2,390

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal – Equities
 
148,056

 
52,963

 

 

 
201,019

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust – Debt
 

 
3,904

 

 

 
3,904

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
58,164

 

 

 
58,164

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
232,667

 

 

 
232,667

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
51,806

 

 

 
51,806

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
1,927

 

 

 
1,927

 
0.3
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
3,766

 

 

 
3,766

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
352,234

 

 

 
352,234

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
1,617

 

 
1,617

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
30,487

 

 
30,487

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
48,985

 

 
48,985

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
28,414

 

 

 
28,414

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(28,641
)
 
(28,641
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
6,888

 

 

 
6,888

 
1.1
 %
Other – Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
1,286

 
1,286

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
148,056

 
$
440,499

 
$
81,089

 
$
(27,355
)
 
$
642,289

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


309


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
70,116

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
70,116

 
11.9
 %
International
 
59,820

 

 

 

 
59,820

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
1,678

 

 

 
1,678

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
6,467

 

 

 

 
6,467

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust – Global
 

 
44,914

 

 

 
44,914

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust – International
 

 
2,201

 

 

 
2,201

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal – Equities
 
136,403

 
48,793

 

 

 
185,196

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
3,597

 

 

 
3,597

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
53,586

 

 

 
53,586

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
214,355

 

 

 
214,355

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
47,728

 

 

 
47,728

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
1,775

 

 

 
1,775

 
0.3
 %
Other – Asset Backed
 

 
3,470

 

 

 
3,470

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal – Fixed Income
 

 
324,511

 

 

 
324,511

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
1,490

 

 
1,490

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
28,088

 

 
28,088

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
45,130

 

 
45,130

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
26,178

 

 

 
26,178

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(26,386
)
 
(26,386
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
6,345

 

 

 
6,345

 
1.1
 %
Other – Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
1,185

 
1,185

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
136,403

 
$
405,827

 
$
74,708

 
$
(25,201
)
 
$
591,737

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


310


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
59,064

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
59,064

 
11.9
 %
International
 
50,390

 

 

 

 
50,390

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
1,414

 

 

 
1,414

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
5,448

 

 

 

 
5,448

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust – Global
 

 
37,834

 

 

 
37,834

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust – International
 

 
1,854

 

 

 
1,854

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal – Equities
 
114,902

 
41,102

 

 

 
156,004

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust – Debt
 

 
3,030

 

 

 
3,030

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
45,139

 

 

 
45,139

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
180,566

 

 

 
180,566

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
40,205

 

 

 
40,205

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
1,496

 

 

 
1,496

 
0.3
 %
Other – Asset Backed
 

 
2,923

 

 

 
2,923

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal – Fixed Income
 

 
273,359

 

 

 
273,359

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
1,255

 

 
1,255

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
23,660

 

 
23,660

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
38,016

 

 
38,016

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
22,051

 

 

 
22,051

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(22,227
)
 
(22,227
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
5,345

 

 

 
5,345

 
1.1
 %
Other – Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
998

 
998

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
114,902

 
$
341,857

 
$
62,931

 
$
(21,229
)
 
$
498,461

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


311


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
32,642

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
32,642

 
11.9
 %
International
 
27,849

 

 

 

 
27,849

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
781

 

 

 
781

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
3,011

 

 

 

 
3,011

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust - Global
 

 
20,910

 

 

 
20,910

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
1,025

 

 

 
1,025

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
63,502

 
22,716

 

 

 
86,218

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
1,675

 

 

 
1,675

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
24,947

 

 

 
24,947

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
99,792

 

 

 
99,792

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
22,220

 

 

 
22,220

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
827

 

 

 
827

 
0.3
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
1,615

 

 

 
1,615

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
151,076

 

 

 
151,076

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
693

 

 
693

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
13,076

 

 
13,076

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
21,010

 

 
21,010

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
12,187

 

 

 
12,187

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(12,284
)
 
(12,284
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
2,954

 

 

 
2,954

 
1.1
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
552

 
552

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
63,502

 
$
188,933

 
$
34,779

 
$
(11,732
)
 
$
275,482

 
100.0
 %
 

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


312


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
34,382

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
34,382

 
11.9
 %
International
 
29,332

 

 

 

 
29,332

 
10.1
 %
Options
 

 
823

 

 

 
823

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
3,171

 

 

 

 
3,171

 
1.1
 %
Common Collective Trust – Global
 

 
22,023

 

 

 
22,023

 
7.6
 %
Common Collective Trust – International
 

 
1,079

 

 

 
1,079

 
0.4
 %
Subtotal – Equities
 
66,885

 
23,925

 

 

 
90,810

 
31.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust – Debt
 

 
1,764

 

 

 
1,764

 
0.6
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
26,275

 

 

 
26,275

 
9.0
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
105,107

 

 

 
105,107

 
36.2
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
23,403

 

 

 
23,403

 
8.1
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
871

 

 

 
871

 
0.3
 %
Other – Asset Backed
 

 
1,701

 

 

 
1,701

 
0.6
 %
Subtotal – Fixed Income
 

 
159,121

 

 

 
159,121

 
54.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure
 

 

 
730

 

 
730

 
0.3
 %
Real Estate
 

 

 
13,772

 

 
13,772

 
4.7
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
22,129

 

 
22,129

 
7.6
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
12,836

 

 

 
12,836

 
4.4
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(12,938
)
 
(12,938
)
 
(4.5
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
3,111

 

 

 
3,111

 
1.1
 %
Other – Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
581

 
581

 
0.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
66,885

 
$
198,993

 
$
36,631

 
$
(12,357
)
 
$
290,152

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy by Registrant Subsidiary for pension assets:
APCo
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
31,757

 
$
43,939

 
$
75,696

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
2,829

 
3,276

 
6,105

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
9,831

 
1,616

 
11,447

Purchases and Sales
 
1,617

 
(13,930
)
 
154

 
(12,159
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
1,617

 
$
30,487

 
$
48,985

 
$
81,089


313


I&M
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
28,275

 
$
39,121

 
$
67,396

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
417

 
3,902

 
4,319

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
1,448

 
1,924

 
3,372

Purchases and Sales
 
1,490

 
(2,052
)
 
183

 
(379
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
1,490

 
$
28,088

 
$
45,130

 
$
74,708

OPCo
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
25,367

 
$
35,098

 
$
60,465

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
3,802

 
1,895

 
5,697

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
13,219

 
934

 
14,153

Purchases and Sales
 
1,255

 
(18,728
)
 
89

 
(17,384
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
1,255

 
$
23,660

 
$
38,016

 
$
62,931

PSO
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
13,380

 
$
18,513

 
$
31,893

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
683

 
1,622

 
2,305

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
2,371

 
799

 
3,170

Purchases and Sales
 
693

 
(3,358
)
 
76

 
(2,589
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
693

 
$
13,076

 
$
21,010

 
$
34,779

SWEPCo
 
Infrastructure
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$

 
$
14,106

 
$
19,517

 
$
33,623

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 

 
745

 
1,696

 
2,441

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
2,590

 
836

 
3,426

Purchases and Sales
 
730

 
(3,669
)
 
80

 
(2,859
)
Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
730

 
$
13,772

 
$
22,129

 
$
36,631



314


The following tables present the classification of OPEB plan assets within the fair value hierarchy by Registrant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2014 :
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
77,221

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
77,221

 
27.5
%
International
 
93,871

 

 

 

 
93,871

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
2,712

 

 

 
2,712

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
4,905

 

 

 
4,905

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
171,092

 
7,617

 

 

 
178,709

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
17,188

 

 

 
17,188

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
11,775

 

 

 
11,775

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
20,787

 

 

 
20,787

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
3,532

 

 

 
3,532

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
975

 

 

 
975

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
820

 

 

 
820

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
55,077

 

 

 
55,077

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
1,709

 

 

 
1,709

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
35,131

 

 

 
35,131

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
36,840

 

 

 
36,840

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
7,751

 
1,586

 

 

 
9,337

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
670

 
670

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
178,843

 
$
101,120

 
$

 
$
670

 
$
280,633

 
100.0
%
 

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

315


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
55,695

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
55,695

 
27.5
%
International
 
67,705

 

 

 

 
67,705

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
1,956

 

 

 
1,956

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
3,538

 

 

 
3,538

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
123,400

 
5,494

 

 

 
128,894

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
12,397

 

 

 
12,397

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
8,493

 

 

 
8,493

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
14,993

 

 

 
14,993

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
2,547

 

 

 
2,547

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
704

 

 

 
704

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
592

 

 

 
592

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
39,726

 

 

 
39,726

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
1,232

 

 

 
1,232

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
25,339

 

 

 
25,339

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
26,571

 

 

 
26,571

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
5,590

 
1,144

 

 

 
6,734

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
483

 
483

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
128,990

 
$
72,935

 
$

 
$
483

 
$
202,408

 
100.0
%
 

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

316


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
56,743

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
56,743

 
27.5
%
International
 
68,977

 

 

 

 
68,977

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
1,993

 

 

 
1,993

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
3,604

 

 

 
3,604

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
125,720

 
5,597

 

 

 
131,317

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
12,630

 

 

 
12,630

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
8,653

 

 

 
8,653

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
15,274

 

 

 
15,274

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
2,595

 

 

 
2,595

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
717

 

 

 
717

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
603

 

 

 
603

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
40,472

 

 

 
40,472

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
1,256

 

 

 
1,256

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
25,815

 

 

 
25,815

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
27,071

 

 

 
27,071

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
5,695

 
1,165

 

 

 
6,860

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
492

 
492

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
131,415

 
$
74,305

 
$

 
$
492

 
$
206,212

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

317


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
26,425

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
26,425

 
27.5
%
International
 
32,126

 

 

 

 
32,126

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
928

 

 

 
928

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
1,679

 

 

 
1,679

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
58,551

 
2,607

 

 

 
61,158

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
5,882

 

 

 
5,882

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
4,030

 

 

 
4,030

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
7,114

 

 

 
7,114

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
1,209

 

 

 
1,209

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
334

 

 

 
334

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
281

 

 

 
281

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
18,850

 

 

 
18,850

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
585

 

 

 
585

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
12,023

 

 

 
12,023

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
12,608

 

 

 
12,608

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
2,653

 
543

 

 

 
3,196

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
229

 
229

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
61,204

 
$
34,608

 
$

 
$
229

 
$
96,041

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

318


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
29,286

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
29,286

 
27.5
%
International
 
35,601

 

 

 

 
35,601

 
33.5
%
Options
 

 
1,029

 

 

 
1,029

 
1.0
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
1,860

 

 

 
1,860

 
1.8
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
64,887

 
2,889

 

 

 
67,776

 
63.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
6,519

 

 

 
6,519

 
6.1
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
4,466

 

 

 
4,466

 
4.2
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
7,884

 

 

 
7,884

 
7.4
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
1,339

 

 

 
1,339

 
1.3
%
State and Local Government
 

 
370

 

 

 
370

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
311

 

 

 
311

 
0.3
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
20,889

 

 

 
20,889

 
19.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
648

 

 

 
648

 
0.6
%
United States Bonds
 

 
13,324

 

 

 
13,324

 
12.5
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
13,972

 

 

 
13,972

 
13.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
2,940

 
601

 

 

 
3,541

 
3.3
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
254

 
254

 
0.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
67,827

 
$
38,351

 
$

 
$
254

 
$
106,432

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.


319


The following tables present the classification of pension plan assets within the fair value hierarchy by Registrant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2013 :
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
145,515

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
145,515

 
23.2
 %
International
 
68,591

 

 

 

 
68,591

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
7,718

 

 

 

 
7,718

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
1,302

 

 

 
1,302

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
221,824

 
1,302

 

 

 
223,126

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
3,456

 

 

 
3,456

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
51,556

 

 

 
51,556

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
213,280

 

 

 
213,280

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
45,818

 

 

 
45,818

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
3,730

 

 

 
3,730

 
0.6
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
4,437

 

 

 
4,437

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
322,277

 

 

 
322,277

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
31,757

 

 
31,757

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
43,939

 

 
43,939

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
4,689

 

 

 
4,689

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(6,024
)
 
(6,024
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
6,476

 

 

 
6,476

 
1.0
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
1,755

 
1,755

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
221,824

 
$
334,744

 
$
75,696

 
$
(4,269
)
 
$
627,995

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

320


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
129,561

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
129,561

 
23.2
 %
International
 
61,071

 

 

 

 
61,071

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
6,872

 

 

 

 
6,872

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
1,159

 

 

 
1,159

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
197,504

 
1,159

 

 

 
198,663

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
3,077

 

 

 
3,077

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
45,904

 

 

 
45,904

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
189,896

 

 

 
189,896

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
40,794

 

 

 
40,794

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
3,321

 

 

 
3,321

 
0.6
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
3,951

 

 

 
3,951

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
286,943

 

 

 
286,943

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
28,275

 

 
28,275

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
39,121

 

 
39,121

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
4,175

 

 

 
4,175

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(5,363
)
 
(5,363
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
5,766

 

 

 
5,766

 
1.0
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
1,563

 
1,563

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
197,504

 
$
298,043

 
$
67,396

 
$
(3,800
)
 
$
559,143

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

321


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
116,233

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
116,233

 
23.2
 %
International
 
54,790

 

 

 

 
54,790

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
6,165

 

 

 

 
6,165

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
1,040

 

 

 
1,040

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
177,188

 
1,040

 

 

 
178,228

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
2,761

 

 

 
2,761

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
41,183

 

 

 
41,183

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
170,365

 

 

 
170,365

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
36,599

 

 

 
36,599

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
2,980

 

 

 
2,980

 
0.6
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
3,545

 

 

 
3,545

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
257,433

 

 

 
257,433

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
25,367

 

 
25,367

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
35,098

 

 
35,098

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
3,745

 

 

 
3,745

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(4,812
)
 
(4,812
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
5,173

 

 

 
5,173

 
1.0
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
1,402

 
1,402

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
177,188

 
$
267,391

 
$
60,465

 
$
(3,410
)
 
$
501,634

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

322


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
61,309

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
61,309

 
23.2
 %
International
 
28,900

 

 

 

 
28,900

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
3,252

 

 

 

 
3,252

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust – International
 

 
548

 

 

 
548

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal – Equities
 
93,461

 
548

 

 

 
94,009

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust – Debt
 

 
1,456

 

 

 
1,456

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
21,723

 

 

 
21,723

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
89,863

 

 

 
89,863

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
19,305

 

 

 
19,305

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
1,572

 

 

 
1,572

 
0.6
 %
Other – Asset Backed
 

 
1,870

 

 

 
1,870

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal – Fixed Income
 

 
135,789

 

 

 
135,789

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
13,380

 

 
13,380

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
18,513

 

 
18,513

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
1,976

 

 

 
1,976

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(2,538
)
 
(2,538
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
2,729

 

 

 
2,729

 
1.0
 %
Other – Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
739

 
739

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
93,461

 
$
141,042

 
$
31,893

 
$
(1,799
)
 
$
264,597

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

323


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
64,634

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
64,634

 
23.2
 %
International
 
30,467

 

 

 

 
30,467

 
10.9
 %
Real Estate Investment Trusts
 
3,428

 

 

 

 
3,428

 
1.2
 %
Common Collective Trust  International
 

 
578

 

 

 
578

 
0.2
 %
Subtotal  Equities
 
98,529

 
578

 

 

 
99,107

 
35.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
1,535

 

 

 
1,535

 
0.5
 %
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
22,901

 

 

 
22,901

 
8.2
 %
Corporate Debt
 

 
94,736

 

 

 
94,736

 
34.0
 %
Foreign Debt
 

 
20,352

 

 

 
20,352

 
7.3
 %
State and Local Government
 

 
1,657

 

 

 
1,657

 
0.6
 %
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
1,971

 

 

 
1,971

 
0.7
 %
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
143,152

 

 

 
143,152

 
51.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 

 

 
14,106

 

 
14,106

 
5.0
 %
Alternative Investments
 

 

 
19,517

 

 
19,517

 
7.0
 %
Securities Lending
 

 
2,083

 

 

 
2,083

 
0.8
 %
Securities Lending Collateral (a)
 

 

 

 
(2,676
)
 
(2,676
)
 
(0.9
)%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 

 
2,877

 

 

 
2,877

 
1.0
 %
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (b)
 

 

 

 
780

 
780

 
0.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
98,529

 
$
148,690

 
$
33,623

 
$
(1,896
)
 
$
278,946

 
100.0
 %

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent an obligation to repay collateral received as part of the Securities Lending Program.
(b)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for pension assets by Registrant Subsidiary:
APCo
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
29,063

 
$
25,888

 
$
54,951

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
3,861

 
1,932

 
5,793

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
1,949

 
1,949

Purchases and Sales
 
(1,167
)
 
14,170

 
13,003

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
31,757

 
$
43,939

 
$
75,696


324


I&M
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
25,811

 
$
22,992

 
$
48,803

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
3,531

 
1,727

 
5,258

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
1,741

 
1,741

Purchases and Sales
 
(1,067
)
 
12,661

 
11,594

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
28,275

 
$
39,121

 
$
67,396

OPCo
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
47,464

 
$
42,279

 
$
89,743

Transfer of OPCo Generation Plan Assets
 
(26,218
)
 
(36,275
)
 
(62,493
)
Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
5,907

 
3,113

 
9,020

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
3,142

 
3,142

Purchases and Sales
 
(1,786
)
 
22,839

 
21,053

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
25,367

 
$
35,098

 
$
60,465

PSO
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
12,382

 
$
11,030

 
$
23,412

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
1,430

 
801

 
2,231

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
808

 
808

Purchases and Sales
 
(432
)
 
5,874

 
5,442

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
13,380

 
$
18,513

 
$
31,893

SWEPCo
 
Real
Estate
 
Alternative
Investments
 
Total
Level 3
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
 
$
13,078

 
$
11,649

 
$
24,727

Actual Return on Plan Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relating to Assets Still Held as of the Reporting Date
 
1,474

 
841

 
2,315

Relating to Assets Sold During the Period
 

 
850

 
850

Purchases and Sales
 
(446
)
 
6,177

 
5,731

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
14,106

 
$
19,517

 
$
33,623

 

325


The following tables present the classification of OPEB plan assets within the fair value hierarchy by Registrant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2013 :
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
79,369

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
79,369

 
27.9
%
International
 
103,188

 

 

 

 
103,188

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
2,463

 

 

 
2,463

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
182,557

 
2,463

 

 

 
185,020

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
14,737

 

 

 
14,737

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
9,476

 

 

 
9,476

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
18,458

 

 

 
18,458

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
3,605

 

 

 
3,605

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
776

 

 

 
776

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
1,362

 

 

 
1,362

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
48,414

 

 

 
48,414

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
2,219

 

 

 
2,219

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
35,470

 

 

 
35,470

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
37,689

 

 

 
37,689

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
11,441

 
1,470

 

 

 
12,911

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
806

 
806

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
193,998

 
$
90,036

 
$

 
$
806

 
$
284,840

 
100.0
%
 

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

326


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
57,460

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
57,460

 
27.9
%
International
 
74,705

 

 

 

 
74,705

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
1,783

 

 

 
1,783

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
132,165

 
1,783

 

 

 
133,948

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
10,669

 

 

 
10,669

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
6,860

 

 

 
6,860

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
13,363

 

 

 
13,363

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
2,610

 

 

 
2,610

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
562

 

 

 
562

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
986

 

 

 
986

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
35,050

 

 

 
35,050

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
1,607

 

 

 
1,607

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
25,679

 

 

 
25,679

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
27,286

 

 

 
27,286

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
8,283

 
1,064

 

 

 
9,347

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
583

 
583

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
140,448

 
$
65,183

 
$

 
$
583

 
$
206,214

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

327


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
59,069

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
59,069

 
27.9
%
International
 
76,799

 

 

 

 
76,799

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
1,833

 

 

 
1,833

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
135,868

 
1,833

 

 

 
137,701

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
10,968

 

 

 
10,968

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
7,053

 

 

 
7,053

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
13,738

 

 

 
13,738

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
2,683

 

 

 
2,683

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
577

 

 

 
577

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
1,014

 

 

 
1,014

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
36,033

 

 

 
36,033

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
1,652

 

 

 
1,652

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
26,399

 

 

 
26,399

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
28,051

 

 

 
28,051

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
8,515

 
1,094

 

 

 
9,609

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
600

 
600

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
144,383

 
$
67,011

 
$

 
$
600

 
$
211,994

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

328


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
26,842

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
26,842

 
27.9
%
International
 
34,898

 

 

 

 
34,898

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
833

 

 

 
833

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
61,740

 
833

 

 

 
62,573

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
4,984

 

 

 
4,984

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
3,205

 

 

 
3,205

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
6,243

 

 

 
6,243

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
1,219

 

 

 
1,219

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
262

 

 

 
262

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
461

 

 

 
461

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
16,374

 

 

 
16,374

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
751

 

 

 
751

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
11,996

 

 

 
11,996

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
12,747

 

 

 
12,747

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
3,869

 
497

 

 

 
4,366

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
273

 
273

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
65,609

 
$
30,451

 
$

 
$
273

 
$
96,333

 
100.0
%
 

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

329


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Class
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
 
Year End
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Equities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic
 
$
30,022

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
30,022

 
27.9
%
International
 
39,034

 

 

 

 
39,034

 
36.2
%
Common Collective Trust  Global
 

 
932

 

 

 
932

 
0.9
%
Subtotal  Equities
 
69,056

 
932

 

 

 
69,988

 
65.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Collective Trust  Debt
 

 
5,575

 

 

 
5,575

 
5.2
%
United States Government and Agency Securities
 

 
3,585

 

 

 
3,585

 
3.3
%
Corporate Debt
 

 
6,982

 

 

 
6,982

 
6.5
%
Foreign Debt
 

 
1,364

 

 

 
1,364

 
1.2
%
State and Local Government
 

 
294

 

 

 
294

 
0.3
%
Other  Asset Backed
 

 
515

 

 

 
515

 
0.5
%
Subtotal  Fixed Income
 

 
18,315

 

 

 
18,315

 
17.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust Owned Life Insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Equities
 

 
840

 

 

 
840

 
0.8
%
United States Bonds
 

 
13,418

 

 

 
13,418

 
12.4
%
Subtotal  Trust Owned Life Insurance
 

 
14,258

 

 

 
14,258

 
13.2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
4,328

 
556

 

 

 
4,884

 
4.5
%
Other  Pending Transactions and Accrued Income (a)
 

 

 

 
305

 
305

 
0.3
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
73,384

 
$
34,061

 
$

 
$
305

 
$
107,750

 
100.0
%

(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent accrued interest, dividend receivables and transactions pending settlement.

Determination of Pension Expense

The determination of pension expense or income is based on a market-related valuation of assets which reduces year-to-year volatility.  This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur.  Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans is as follows:
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Qualified Pension Plan
 
$
688,632

 
$
598,190

 
$
512,467

 
$
270,059

 
$
281,210

Nonqualified Pension Plans
 
464

 
470

 
69

 
2,750

 
1,749

Total as of December 31, 2014
 
$
689,096

 
$
598,660

 
$
512,536

 
$
272,809

 
$
282,959

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Qualified Pension Plan
 
$
653,968

 
$
560,443

 
$
512,798

 
$
248,472

 
$
256,083

Nonqualified Pension Plans
 
200

 
326

 
6

 
1,387

 
1,115

Total as of December 31, 2013
 
$
654,168

 
$
560,769

 
$
512,804

 
$
249,859

 
$
257,198



330


For the underfunded pension plans that had an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets of these plans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
Projected Benefit Obligation
$
702,805

 
$
617,948

 
$
526,250

 
$
2,770

 
$
1,790

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$
689,096

 
$
598,660

 
$
512,536

 
$
2,750

 
$
1,749

Fair Value of Plan Assets
642,289

 
591,737

 
498,461

 

 

Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation as of December 31, 2014
$
(46,807
)
 
$
(6,923
)
 
$
(14,075
)
 
$
(2,750
)
 
$
(1,749
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
Projected Benefit Obligation
$
663,231

 
$
574,699

 
$
523,643

 
$
1,394

 
$
1,124

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$
654,168

 
$
560,769

 
$
512,804

 
$
1,387

 
$
1,115

Fair Value of Plan Assets
627,995

 
559,143

 
501,634

 

 

Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation as of December 31, 2013
$
(26,173
)
 
$
(1,626
)
 
$
(11,170
)
 
$
(1,387
)
 
$
(1,115
)

Estimated Future Benefit Payments and Contributions

The estimated pension benefit payments and contributions to the trust are at least the minimum amount required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act plus payment of unfunded nonqualified benefits.  For the qualified pension plan, additional discretionary contributions may also be made to maintain the funded status of the plan.   For OPEB plans, expected payments include the payment of unfunded benefits.  The following table provides the estimated contributions and payments by Registrant Subsidiary for 2015 :
Company
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
11,631

 
$
2,884

I&M
 
12,492

 

OPCo
 
7,847

 

PSO
 
6,656

 

SWEPCo
 
7,840

 


The tables below reflect the total benefits expected to be paid from the plan or from the Registrant Subsidiaries' assets.  The payments include the participants’ contributions to the plan for their share of the cost.  Effective for employees hired after December 2013, retiree medical coverage will not be provided.  Future benefit payments are dependent on the number of employees retiring, whether the retiring employees elect to receive pension benefits as annuities or as lump sum distributions, future integration of the benefit plans with changes to Medicare and other legislation, future levels of interest rates and variances in actuarial results.  The estimated payments for the pension benefits and OPEB are as follows:
Pension Plans
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
42,859

 
$
33,114

 
$
36,277

 
$
18,950

 
$
18,872

2016
 
43,091

 
33,813

 
36,174

 
19,626

 
18,747

2017
 
43,484

 
35,748

 
35,571

 
20,175

 
20,407

2018
 
45,122

 
36,948

 
35,822

 
21,118

 
21,019

2019
 
45,488

 
38,727

 
36,179

 
21,732

 
22,059

Years 2020 to 2024, in Total
 
236,107

 
209,813

 
176,022

 
109,800

 
118,909

 

331


Other Postretirement Benefit Plans:
Benefit Payments
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
24,828

 
$
15,088

 
$
16,379

 
$
6,989

 
$
7,401

2016
 
24,603

 
15,363

 
16,289

 
7,067

 
7,504

2017
 
24,468

 
15,484

 
16,088

 
7,074

 
7,674

2018
 
24,820

 
15,637

 
16,122

 
7,132

 
7,840

2019
 
24,290

 
15,804

 
16,079

 
7,278

 
7,885

Years 2020 to 2024, in Total
 
121,401

 
84,026

 
80,066

 
38,852

 
43,503

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans:
Medicare Subsidy Receipts
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
232

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

2016
 
236

 

 

 

 

2017
 
234

 

 

 

 

2018
 
231

 

 

 

 

2019
 
230

 

 

 

 

Years 2020 to 2024, in Total
 
1,080

 

 

 

 


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) by Registrant Subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
APCo
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Service Cost
$
7,036

 
$
6,171

 
$
7,565

 
$
1,448

 
$
2,566

 
$
5,387

Interest Cost
29,624

 
27,662

 
30,211

 
12,788

 
13,454

 
18,462

Expected Return on Plan Assets
(33,927
)
 
(37,041
)
 
(41,944
)
 
(18,533
)
 
(18,147
)
 
(16,753
)
Amortization of Transition Obligation

 

 

 

 

 
780

Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
197

 
198

 
475

 
(10,050
)
 
(10,050
)
 
(2,862
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
16,593

 
25,025

 
20,339

 
4,582

 
12,249

 
10,526

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
19,523

 
22,015

 
16,646

 
(9,765
)
 
72

 
15,540

Capitalized Portion
(6,819
)
 
(7,529
)
 
(6,525
)
 
3,411

 
(25
)
 
(6,092
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
$
12,704

 
$
14,486

 
$
10,121

 
$
(6,354
)
 
$
47

 
$
9,448

I&M
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Service Cost
$
10,068

 
$
8,736

 
$
9,908

 
$
1,947

 
$
3,219

 
$
6,621

Interest Cost
26,293

 
24,100

 
26,245

 
7,638

 
8,221

 
12,785

Expected Return on Plan Assets
(30,993
)
 
(32,826
)
 
(37,566
)
 
(13,454
)
 
(13,183
)
 
(12,847
)
Amortization of Transition Obligation

 

 

 

 

 
132

Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
195

 
195

 
407

 
(9,421
)
 
(9,421
)
 
(2,383
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
14,585

 
21,688

 
17,569

 
2,368

 
7,526

 
7,050

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
20,148

 
21,893

 
16,563

 
(10,922
)
 
(3,638
)
 
11,358

Capitalized Portion
(4,638
)
 
(4,576
)
 
(3,114
)
 
2,514

 
760

 
(2,135
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
$
15,510

 
$
17,317

 
$
13,449

 
$
(8,408
)
 
$
(2,878
)
 
$
9,223


332


OPCo
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Service Cost
$
5,140

 
$
5,285

 
$
11,003

 
$
1,026

 
$
2,882

 
$
8,748

Interest Cost
22,105

 
21,939

 
45,194

 
7,601

 
9,494

 
24,189

Expected Return on Plan Assets
(26,427
)
 
(29,919
)
 
(68,401
)
 
(13,519
)
 
(13,468
)
 
(22,555
)
Amortization of Transition Obligation

 

 

 

 

 
104

Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
157

 
157

 
743

 
(6,923
)
 
(6,962
)
 
(3,873
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
12,422

 
19,833

 
30,439

 
2,379

 
8,633

 
13,669

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
13,397

 
17,295

 
18,978

 
(9,436
)
 
579

 
20,282

Capitalized Portion
(5,479
)
 
(6,192
)
 
(7,060
)
 
3,859

 
(207
)
 
(7,545
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
$
7,918

 
$
11,103

 
$
11,918

 
$
(5,577
)
 
$
372

 
$
12,737

PSO
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Service Cost
$
5,207

 
$
5,562

 
$
5,951

 
$
839

 
$
1,372

 
$
2,836

Interest Cost
12,057

 
10,993

 
12,301

 
3,574

 
3,793

 
5,797

Expected Return on Plan Assets
(14,604
)
 
(15,675
)
 
(18,015
)
 
(6,300
)
 
(6,089
)
 
(5,922
)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
296

 
297

 
(948
)
 
(4,290
)
 
(4,289
)
 
(1,079
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
6,753

 
9,845

 
8,206

 
1,109

 
3,476

 
3,189

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
9,709

 
11,022

 
7,495

 
(5,068
)
 
(1,737
)
 
4,821

Capitalized Portion
(3,320
)
 
(3,384
)
 
(2,533
)
 
1,733

 
533

 
(1,629
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
$
6,389

 
$
7,638

 
$
4,962

 
$
(3,335
)
 
$
(1,204
)
 
$
3,192

SWEPCo
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Service Cost
$
6,618

 
$
7,011

 
$
7,099

 
$
1,012

 
$
1,693

 
$
3,324

Interest Cost
12,651

 
11,454

 
12,537

 
3,992

 
4,301

 
6,673

Expected Return on Plan Assets
(15,427
)
 
(16,509
)
 
(18,866
)
 
(7,016
)
 
(6,881
)
 
(6,795
)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
349

 
349

 
(793
)
 
(5,156
)
 
(5,156
)
 
(933
)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss
7,046

 
10,214

 
8,330

 
1,235

 
3,928

 
3,659

Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)
11,237

 
12,519

 
8,307

 
(5,933
)
 
(2,115
)
 
5,928

Capitalized Portion
(3,391
)
 
(3,518
)
 
(2,924
)
 
1,791

 
594

 
(2,087
)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized in Expense
$
7,846

 
$
9,001

 
$
5,383

 
$
(4,142
)
 
$
(1,521
)
 
$
3,841


333


Estimated amounts expected to be amortized to net periodic benefit costs (credits) and the impact on each Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheet during 2015 are shown in the following tables:
 
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
Pension Plans – Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
14,457

 
$
12,713

 
$
10,823

 
$
5,891

 
$
6,146

Prior Service Cost
 
180

 
181

 
140

 
252

 
308

Total Estimated 2015 Amortization
 
$
14,637

 
$
12,894

 
$
10,963

 
$
6,143

 
$
6,454

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension Plans –
Expected to be Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Asset
 
$
14,560

 
$
12,114

 
$
10,963

 
$
6,143

 
$
6,454

Deferred Income Taxes
 
27

 
273

 

 

 

Net of Tax AOCI
 
50

 
507

 

 

 

Total
 
$
14,637

 
$
12,894

 
$
10,963

 
$
6,143

 
$
6,454

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans –
Components
 
(in thousands)
Net Actuarial Loss
 
$
3,353

 
$
1,814

 
$
1,848

 
$
861

 
$
954

Prior Service Credit
 
(10,050
)
 
(9,421
)
 
(6,922
)
 
(4,290
)
 
(5,156
)
Total Estimated 2015 Amortization
 
$
(6,697
)
 
$
(7,607
)
 
$
(5,074
)
 
$
(3,429
)
 
$
(4,202
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans –
Expected to be Recorded as
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regulatory Asset
 
$
(3,693
)
 
$
(6,934
)
 
$
(5,074
)
 
$
(3,429
)
 
$
(2,687
)
Deferred Income Taxes
 
(1,051
)
 
(236
)
 

 

 
(530
)
Net of Tax AOCI
 
(1,953
)
 
(437
)
 

 

 
(985
)
Total
 
$
(6,697
)
 
$
(7,607
)
 
$
(5,074
)
 
$
(3,429
)
 
$
(4,202
)

American Electric Power System Retirement Savings Plan

The Registrant Subsidiaries participate in an AEP sponsored defined contribution retirement savings plan, the American Electric Power System Retirement Savings Plan, for substantially all employees who are not covered by a retirement savings plan of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA).  This qualified plan offers participants an opportunity to contribute a portion of their pay, includes features under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and provides for company matching contributions.  The matching contributions to the plan are 100% of the first 1% of eligible employee contributions and 70% of the next 5% of contributions.

The following table provides the cost for matching contributions to the retirement savings plans by Registrant Subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
7,280

 
$
7,366

 
$
7,579

I&M
 
10,461

 
10,010

 
9,706

OPCo
 
5,207

 
6,502

 
10,798

PSO
 
4,026

 
3,784

 
3,732

SWEPCo
 
5,272

 
4,970

 
4,890



334


UMWA Benefits

APCo provides UMWA pension, health and welfare benefits for certain unionized mining retirees and their survivors who meet eligibility requirements.  UMWA trustees make final interpretive determinations with regard to all benefits.  The pension benefits are administered by UMWA trustees.  APCo administers the health and welfare benefits and pays them from its general assets.

The UMWA pension benefits are administered through a multiemployer plan that is different from single-employer plans as an employer’s contributions may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.  Required contributions not made by an employer may result in other employers bearing the unfunded plan obligations, while a withdrawing employer may be subject to a withdrawal liability.  UMWA pension benefits are provided through the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (Employer Identification Number: 52-1050282, Plan Number 002), which under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was in Critical Status for the plan year ending June 30, 2014 and in Seriously Endangered Status for the plan year ending June 30, 2013 , without utilization of extended amortization provisions.  The Plan adopted a funding improvement plan in May 2012, as required under the PPA.

Contributions to the UMWA pension plan in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were immaterial and represent less than 5% of the total contributions in the plan’s latest annual report for the years ended June 30, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .  UMWA pension contributions included a surcharge of 5% beginning December 2014 and are scheduled to include a surcharge of 10% beginning July 2015.  There are no minimum contributions for future years.

335


9 .   BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Registrant Subsidiaries each have one reportable segment, an integrated electricity generation, transmission and distribution business, except OPCo, an electricity transmission and distribution business starting in 2014.  The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other activities are insignificant.  The Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations are managed on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures and operating results.

336


10 .   DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

OBJECTIVES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Registrant Subsidiaries are exposed to certain market risks as major power producers and marketers of wholesale electricity, natural gas, coal and emission allowances.  These risks include commodity price risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency exchange risk.  These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact the Registrant Subsidiaries due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, manages these risks using derivative instruments.

STRATEGIES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES

Risk Management Strategies

The strategy surrounding the use of derivative instruments primarily focuses on managing risk exposures, future cash flows and creating value utilizing both economic and formal hedging strategies.  The risk management strategies also include the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes, focusing on seizing market opportunities to create value driven by expected changes in the market prices of the commodities in which AEPSC transacts on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries.  To accomplish these objectives, AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, primarily employs risk management contracts including physical and financial forward purchase-and-sale contracts and, to a lesser extent, OTC swaps and options.  Not all risk management contracts meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”  Derivative risk management contracts elected normal under the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception are not subject to the requirements of this accounting guidance.

AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other commodity contracts to manage the risk associated with the energy business.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into interest rate derivative contracts in order to manage the interest rate exposure associated with the Registrant Subsidiaries’ commodity portfolio.  For disclosure purposes, such risks are grouped as “Commodity,” as these risks are related to energy risk management activities.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, also engages in risk management of interest rate risk associated with debt financing and foreign currency risk associated with future purchase obligations denominated in foreign currencies.  For disclosure purposes, these risks are grouped as “Interest Rate and Foreign Currency.”  The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations and Finance groups in accordance with established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of AEP’s Board of Directors.


337


The following tables represent the gross notional volume of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ outstanding derivative contracts as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Notional Volume of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
Primary Risk
Exposure
 
Unit of
Measure
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Power
 
MWhs
 
32,479

 
23,774

 
20,334

 
16,765

 
20,469

Coal
 
Tons
 
279

 
500

 

 

 
1,500

Natural Gas
 
MMBtus
 
421

 
286

 

 

 

Heating Oil and Gasoline
 
Gallons
 
1,089

 
521

 
1,108

 
614

 
699

Interest Rate
 
USD
 
$
5,094

 
$
3,455

 
$

 
$

 
$


Notional Volume of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
Primary Risk
Exposure
 
Unit of
Measure
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Commodity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Power
 
MWhs
 
48,995

 
33,231

 
34,843

 
13,469

 
17,057

Coal
 
Tons
 
31

 
3,389

 

 
1,013

 
1,692

Natural Gas
 
MMBtus
 
2,477

 
1,680

 

 

 

Heating Oil and Gasoline
 
Gallons
 
1,089

 
521

 
1,108

 
614

 
699

Interest Rate
 
USD
 
$
12,720

 
$
8,627

 
$

 
$

 
$


Cash Flow Hedging Strategies

AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into and designates as cash flow hedges certain derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of power (“Commodity”) in order to manage the variable price risk related to forecasted purchases and sales.  Management monitors the potential impacts of commodity price changes and, where appropriate, enters into derivative transactions to protect profit margins for a portion of future electricity sales and purchases.  The Registrant Subsidiaries do not hedge all commodity price risk.

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ vehicle fleet is exposed to gasoline and diesel fuel price volatility.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into financial heating oil and gasoline derivative contracts in order to mitigate price risk of future fuel purchases.  Cash flow hedge accounting for these derivative contracts was discontinued effective March 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Registrant Subsidiaries designated financial heating oil and gasoline derivatives as cash flow hedges. For disclosure purposes, these contracts were included with other hedging activities as “Commodity” as of December 31, 2013.  In March 2014, these contracts were grouped as "Commodity" with other risk management activities. The Registrant Subsidiaries do not hedge all fuel price risk.

AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into a variety of interest rate derivative transactions in order to manage interest rate risk exposure.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, enters into interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest rate exposure related to future borrowings of fixed-rate debt.  The Registrant Subsidiaries do not hedge all interest rate exposure.

At times, the Registrant Subsidiaries are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks primarily when some fixed assets are purchased from foreign suppliers.  In accordance with AEP’s risk management policy, AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, may enter into foreign currency derivative transactions to protect against the risk of increased cash outflows resulting from a foreign currency’s appreciation against the dollar.  The Registrant Subsidiaries do not hedge all foreign currency exposure.

338


ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND THE IMPACT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging” requires recognition of all qualifying derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value.  The fair values of derivative instruments accounted for using MTM accounting or hedge accounting are based on exchange prices and broker quotes.  If a quoted market price is not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available including valuation models that estimate future energy prices based on existing market and broker quotes, supply and demand market data and assumptions.  In order to determine the relevant fair values of the derivative instruments, the Registrant Subsidiaries also apply valuation adjustments for discounting, liquidity and credit quality.

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to perform on the contract or fail to pay amounts due.  Liquidity risk represents the risk that imperfections in the market will cause the price to vary from estimated fair value based upon prevailing market supply and demand conditions.  Since energy markets are imperfect and volatile, there are inherent risks related to the underlying assumptions in models used to fair value risk management contracts.  Unforeseen events may cause reasonable price curves to differ from actual price curves throughout a contract’s term and at the time a contract settles.  Consequently, there could be significant adverse or favorable effects on future net income and cash flows if market prices are not consistent with management’s estimates of current market consensus for forward prices in the current period.  This is particularly true for longer term contracts.  Cash flows may vary based on market conditions, margin requirements and the timing of settlement of risk management contracts.

According to the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging,” the Registrant Subsidiaries reflect the fair values of derivative instruments subject to netting agreements with the same counterparty net of related cash collateral.  For certain risk management contracts, the Registrant Subsidiaries are required to post or receive cash collateral based on third party contractual agreements and risk profiles.  For the December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets, the Registrant Subsidiaries netted cash collateral received from third parties against short-term and long-term risk management assets and cash collateral paid to third parties against short-term and long-term risk management liabilities as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Company
 
Cash Collateral
Received
Netted Against
Risk Management
Assets
 
Cash Collateral
Paid
Netted Against
Risk Management
Liabilities
 
Cash Collateral
Received
Netted Against
Risk Management
Assets
 
Cash Collateral
Paid
Netted Against
Risk Management
Liabilities
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
68

 
$
98

 
$

 
$
2,993

I&M
 
163

 
47

 

 
2,030

OPCo
 

 
102

 

 

PSO
 

 
54

 

 
1

SWEPCo
 

 
62

 

 
3


339


The following tables represent the gross fair value of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative activity on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

APCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
32,903

 
$

 
$

 
$
32,903

 
$
(9,111
)
 
$
23,792

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
5,159

 

 

 
5,159

 
(268
)
 
4,891

Total Assets
 
38,062

 

 

 
38,062

 
(9,379
)
 
28,683

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
20,161

 

 

 
20,161

 
(9,144
)
 
11,017

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
2,322

 

 

 
2,322

 
(265
)
 
2,057

Total Liabilities
 
22,483

 

 

 
22,483

 
(9,409
)
 
13,074

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
15,579

 
$

 
$

 
$
15,579

 
$
30

 
$
15,609


APCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
46,431

 
$
389

 
$

 
$
46,820

 
$
(25,649
)
 
$
21,171

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
20,948

 

 

 
20,948

 
(4,000
)
 
16,948

Total Assets
 
67,379

 
389

 

 
67,768

 
(29,649
)
 
38,119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
37,010

 
313

 

 
37,323

 
(28,431
)
 
8,892

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
14,452

 

 

 
14,452

 
(4,211
)
 
10,241

Total Liabilities
 
51,462

 
313

 

 
51,775

 
(32,642
)
 
19,133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
15,917

 
$
76

 
$

 
$
15,993

 
$
2,993

 
$
18,986


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.

340


I&M

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
28,545

 
$

 
$

 
$
28,545

 
$
(6,217
)
 
$
22,328

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
3,499

 

 

 
3,499

 
(182
)
 
3,317

Total Assets
 
32,044

 

 

 
32,044

 
(6,399
)
 
25,645

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
11,326

 

 

 
11,326

 
(6,103
)
 
5,223

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,575

 

 

 
1,575

 
(180
)
 
1,395

Total Liabilities
 
12,901

 

 

 
12,901

 
(6,283
)
 
6,618

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
19,143

 
$

 
$

 
$
19,143

 
$
(116
)
 
$
19,027


I&M

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
33,229

 
$
234

 
$

 
$
33,463

 
$
(18,075
)
 
$
15,388

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
14,208

 

 

 
14,208

 
(2,713
)
 
11,495

Total Assets
 
47,437

 
234

 

 
47,671

 
(20,788
)
 
26,883

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
26,779

 
212

 

 
26,991

 
(19,962
)
 
7,029

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
9,802

 

 

 
9,802

 
(2,856
)
 
6,946

Total Liabilities
 
36,581

 
212

 

 
36,793

 
(22,818
)
 
13,975

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
10,856

 
$
22

 
$

 
$
10,878

 
$
2,030

 
$
12,908


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.


341


OPCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
7,242

 
$

 
$

 
$
7,242

 
$

 
$
7,242

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 
45,102

 

 

 
45,102

 

 
45,102

Total Assets
 
52,344

 

 

 
52,344

 

 
52,344

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
2,045

 

 

 
2,045

 
(102
)
 
1,943

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 
3,013

 

 

 
3,013

 

 
3,013

Total Liabilities
 
5,058

 

 

 
5,058

 
(102
)
 
4,956

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
47,286

 
$

 
$

 
$
47,286

 
$
102

 
$
47,388


OPCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
3,269

 
$
162

 
$

 
$
3,431

 
$
(349
)
 
$
3,082

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets
 
3,269

 
162

 

 
3,431

 
(349
)
 
3,082

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
349

 

 

 
349

 
(349
)
 

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities
 
349

 

 

 
349

 
(349
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
2,920

 
$
162

 
$

 
$
3,082

 
$

 
$
3,082


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.


342


PSO

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
360

 
$

 
$

 
$
360

 
$
(360
)
 
$

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets
 
360

 

 

 
360

 
(360
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,332

 

 

 
1,332

 
(414
)
 
918

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities
 
1,332

 

 

 
1,332

 
(414
)
 
918

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
(972
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(972
)
 
$
54

 
$
(918
)
 

PSO

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
1,078

 
$
84

 
$

 
$
1,162

 
$
5

 
$
1,167

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets
 
1,078

 
84

 

 
1,162

 
5

 
1,167

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
81

 

 

 
81

 
4

 
85

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities
 
81

 

 

 
81

 
4

 
85

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
997

 
$
84

 
$

 
$
1,081

 
$
1

 
$
1,082


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.


343


SWEPCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2014
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
471

 
$

 
$

 
$
471

 
$
(440
)
 
$
31

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets
 
471

 

 

 
471

 
(440
)
 
31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
1,584

 

 

 
1,584

 
(502
)
 
1,082

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities
 
1,584

 

 

 
1,584

 
(502
)
 
1,082

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
(1,113
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,113
)
 
$
62

 
$
(1,051
)

SWEPCo

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2013
 
 
Risk
Management
Contracts
 
Hedging Contracts
 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Commodity (a)
 
Commodity (a)
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency (a)
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
Current Risk Management Assets
 
$
1,233

 
$
97

 
$

 
$
1,330

 
$
(151
)
 
$
1,179

Long-term Risk Management Assets
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets
 
1,233

 
97

 

 
1,330

 
(151
)
 
1,179

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Risk Management Liabilities
 
154

 

 

 
154

 
(154
)
 

Long-term Risk Management Liabilities
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities
 
154

 

 

 
154

 
(154
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
 
$
1,079

 
$
97

 
$

 
$
1,176

 
$
3

 
$
1,179


(a)
Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(b)
Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for "Derivatives and Hedging."
(c)
There are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.


344


The tables below present the Registrant Subsidiaries’ activity of derivative risk management contracts for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
Location of Gain (Loss)
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$
8,732

 
$
13,151

 
$
40

 
$
185

 
$
56

Sales to AEP Affiliates
 

 
(854
)
 

 
854

 

Regulatory Assets (a)
 
(4,077
)
 
(503
)
 

 
(970
)
 
(1,142
)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)
 
49,555

 
37,410

 
85,944

 
304

 
16,851

Total Gain on Risk Management Contracts
 
$
54,210

 
$
49,204

 
$
85,984

 
$
373

 
$
15,765


Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
Location of Gain (Loss)
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$
2,019

 
$
10,624

 
$
4,886

 
$
371

 
$
647

Regulatory Assets (a)
 
(4
)
 
(26
)
 
(5,795
)
 
2,956

 
424

Regulatory Liabilities (a)
 
(338
)
 
(9,062
)
 
2,920

 
999

 
1,462

Total Gain on Risk Management Contracts
 
$
1,677

 
$
1,536

 
$
2,011

 
$
4,326

 
$
2,533


Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
 Year Ended December 31, 2012
Location of Gain (Loss)
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues
 
$
(1,149
)
 
$
11,437

 
$
11,978

 
$
163

 
$
398

Regulatory Assets (a)
 
(7,835
)
 
(9,204
)
 
(14,104
)
 
(5,304
)
 
(6,274
)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)
 
7,314

 
(889
)
 

 
(19
)
 
(13
)
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts
 
$
(1,670
)
 
$
1,344

 
$
(2,126
)
 
$
(5,160
)
 
$
(5,889
)

(a)
Represents realized and unrealized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.

Certain qualifying derivative instruments have been designated as normal purchase or normal sale contracts, as provided in the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”  Derivative contracts that have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales under that accounting guidance are not subject to MTM accounting treatment and are recognized on the statements of income on an accrual basis.

The accounting for the changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it qualifies for and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship.  Depending on the exposure, management designates a hedging instrument as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge.


345


For contracts that have not been designated as part of a hedging relationship, the accounting for changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative instrument is held for trading purposes.  Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments held for trading purposes are included in revenues on a net basis on the statements of income.  Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments not held for trading purposes are included in revenues or expenses on the statements of income depending on the relevant facts and circumstances.  However, unrealized and some realized gains and losses in regulated jurisdictions for both trading and non-trading derivative instruments are recorded as regulatory assets (for losses) or regulatory liabilities (for gains) in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations.”

Accounting for Cash Flow Hedging Strategies

For cash flow hedges (i.e. hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the Registrant Subsidiaries initially report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets until the period the hedged item affects Net Income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize any hedge ineffectiveness in Net Income immediately during the period of change, except in regulated jurisdictions where hedge ineffectiveness is recorded as a regulatory asset (for losses) or a regulatory liability (for gains).

Realized gains and losses on derivative contracts for the purchase and sale of power designated as cash flow hedges are included in Revenues or Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income or in Regulatory Assets or Regulatory Liabilities on the balance sheets, depending on the specific nature of the risk being hedged.  During 2014 , APCo and I&M designated power derivatives as cash flow hedges. During 2013 and 2012 , APCo, I&M and OPCo designated power derivatives as cash flow hedges.

The Registrant Subsidiaries reclassify gains and losses on heating oil and gasoline derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Other Operation expense, Maintenance expense or Depreciation and Amortization expense, as it relates to capital projects, on the statements of income.  During 2013 and 2012 , the Registrant Subsidiaries designated heating oil and gasoline derivatives as cash flow hedges. The impact of cash flow hedge accounting for these derivative contracts was immaterial and discontinued effective March 31, 2014.

The Registrant Subsidiaries reclassify gains and losses on interest rate derivative hedges related to debt financings from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Interest Expense on the statements of income in those periods in which hedged interest payments occur.  During 2014 and 2013 , I&M designated interest rate derivatives as cash flow hedges.  During 2012 , I&M and SWEPCo designated interest rate derivatives as cash flow hedges.

The accumulated gains or losses related to foreign currency hedges are reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Depreciation and Amortization expense on the statements of income over the depreciable lives of the fixed assets designated as the hedged items in qualifying foreign currency hedging relationships.  During 2014 and 2013 , the Registrant Subsidiaries did not designate any foreign currency derivatives as cash flow hedges.  During 2012 , SWEPCo designated foreign currency derivatives as cash flow hedges.
 
During 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial or nonexistent for all of the hedge strategies disclosed above.

For details on designated, effective cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets and the reasons for changes in cash flow hedges, see Note 3 .


346


Cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were:

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on the Registrant Subsidiaries’
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2014
 
 
Hedging Assets (a)
 
Hedging Liabilities (a)
 
AOCI Gain (Loss) Net of Tax
Company
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,896

I&M
 

 

 

 

 

 
(14,406
)
OPCo
 

 

 

 

 

 
5,602

PSO
 

 

 

 

 

 
4,943

SWEPCo
 

 

 

 

 

 
(11,036
)
 
 
Expected to be Reclassified to
Net Income During the Next
Twelve Months
 
 
Company
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Maximum Term for
Exposure to
Variability of Future
Cash Flows
 
 
(in thousands)
 
(in months)
APCo
 
$

 
$
275

 
0
I&M
 

 
(1,090
)
 
0
OPCo
 

 
1,372

 
0
PSO
 

 
759

 
0
SWEPCo
 

 
(1,998
)
 
0

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on the Registrant Subsidiaries’
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2013
 
 
Hedging Assets (a)
 
Hedging Liabilities (a)
 
AOCI Gain (Loss) Net of Tax
Company
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
$
363

 
$

 
$
287

 
$

 
$
94

 
$
3,090

I&M
 
216

 

 
194

 

 
46

 
(15,976
)
OPCo
 
162

 

 

 

 
105

 
6,974

PSO
 
84

 

 

 

 
57

 
5,701

SWEPCo
 
97

 

 

 

 
66

 
(13,304
)
 
 
Expected to be Reclassified to
Net Income During the Next
Twelve Months
Company
 
Commodity
 
Interest Rate
and Foreign
Currency
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
94

 
$
(806
)
I&M
 
46

 
(1,568
)
OPCo
 
105

 
1,363

PSO
 
57

 
759

SWEPCo
 
66

 
(2,267
)

(a)
Hedging Assets and Hedging Liabilities are included in Risk Management Assets and Liabilities on the balance sheets.

The actual amounts reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Net Income can differ from the estimate above due to market price changes.

347



Credit Risk

AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, limits credit risk in their wholesale marketing and trading activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis.  AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, uses Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and current market-based qualitative and quantitative data as well as financial statements to assess the financial health of counterparties on an ongoing basis.

When AEPSC, on behalf of the Registrant Subsidiaries, uses standardized master agreements, these agreements may include collateral requirements.  These master agreements facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty.  Cash, letters of credit and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk.  The collateral agreements require a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event an exposure exceeds the established threshold.  The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with AEP’s credit policy.  In addition, collateral agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a failure or inability to post collateral.

Collateral Triggering Events

Under the tariffs of the RTOs and Independent System Operators (ISOs) and a limited number of derivative and non-derivative contracts primarily related to competitive retail auction loads, the Registrant Subsidiaries are obligated to post an additional amount of collateral if certain credit ratings decline below investment grade.  The amount of collateral required fluctuates based on market prices and total exposure.  On an ongoing basis, AEP’s risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these collateral triggering items in contracts.  The Registrant Subsidiaries have not experienced a downgrade below investment grade.  The following tables represent the Registrant Subsidiaries' exposure if credit ratings were to decline below a specified rating threshold as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
 
December 31, 2014
Company
 
Fair Value
 of Contracts
with Credit Downgrade
Triggers
 
Amount of Collateral
Registrant Subsidiaries'
Would Have Been Required
to Post for Derivative
Contracts as well as Non-
Derivative Contracts Subject
to the Same Master Netting
Arrangement
 
Amount of Collateral
the Registrant Subsidiaries'
Would Have Been Required to Post Attributable to
RTOs and ISOs
 
Amount of
Collateral Attributable to
Other
Contracts
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$

 
$

 
$
6,339

 
$
74

I&M
 

 

 
4,299

 
47

OPCo
 

 

 

 

PSO
 

 

 
693

 
4,111

SWEPCo
 

 

 
877

 
166

 
 
December 31, 2013
Company
 
Fair Value
of Contracts
with Credit Downgrade
Triggers
 
Amount of Collateral
Registrant Subsidiaries'
Would Have Been Required
to Post for Derivative
Contracts as well as Non-
Derivative Contracts Subject
to the Same Master Netting
Arrangement
 
Amount of Collateral
the Registrant Subsidiaries'
Would Have Been Required to Post Attributable to
RTOs and ISOs
 
Amount of
Collateral Attributable to
Other
Contracts
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
575

 
$

 
$
2,539

 
$
208

I&M
 
390

 

 
1,722

 
141

OPCo
 
349

 

 

 

PSO
 

 

 
410

 
2,520

SWEPCo
 

 

 
519

 
194

 

348


In addition, a majority of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ non-exchange traded commodity contracts contain cross-default provisions that, if triggered, would permit the counterparty to declare a default and require settlement of the outstanding payable.  These cross-default provisions could be triggered if there was a non-performance event by Parent or the obligor under outstanding debt or a third party obligation in excess of $50 million .  On an ongoing basis, AEP’s risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these cross-default provisions in the contracts.  The following tables represent: (a) the fair value of these derivative liabilities subject to cross-default provisions prior to consideration of contractual netting arrangements, (b) the amount this exposure has been reduced by cash collateral posted by the Registrant Subsidiaries and (c) if a cross-default provision would have been triggered, the settlement amount that would be required after considering the Registrant Subsidiaries’ contractual netting arrangements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
 
December 31, 2014
Company
 
Liabilities for
Contracts with Cross
Default Provisions
Prior to Contractual
Netting Arrangements
 
Amount of Cash
Collateral Posted
 
Additional
Settlement
Liability if Cross
Default Provision
is Triggered
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
9,043

 
$

 
$
9,012

I&M
 
6,134

 

 
6,113

OPCo
 

 

 

PSO
 

 

 

SWEPCo
 

 

 

 
 
December 31, 2013
Company
 
Liabilities for
Contracts with Cross
Default Provisions
Prior to Contractual
Netting Arrangements
 
Amount of Cash
Collateral Posted
 
Additional
Settlement
Liability if Cross
Default Provision
is Triggered
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
19,648

 
$

 
$
18,568

I&M
 
13,326

 

 
12,594

OPCo
 

 

 

PSO
 
3

 

 
3

SWEPCo
 
3

 

 
3


349


11 .   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value Measurements of Long-term Debt

The fair values of Long-term Debt are based on quoted market prices, without credit enhancements, for the same or similar issues and the current interest rates offered for instruments with similar maturities classified as Level 2 measurement inputs.  These instruments are not marked-to-market.  The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.

The book values and fair values of Long-term Debt for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized in the following table:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Company
 
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
3,980,274

 
$
4,711,210

 
$
4,194,357

 
$
4,587,079

I&M
 
2,027,397

 
2,255,124

 
2,039,016

 
2,174,891

OPCo
 
2,297,123

 
2,709,452

 
2,735,175

 
3,007,191

PSO
 
1,041,036

 
1,216,205

 
999,810

 
1,111,149

SWEPCo
 
2,140,437

 
2,402,639

 
2,043,332

 
2,214,730


Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal

I&M records securities held in trust funds for decommissioning nuclear facilities and for the disposal of SNF at fair value.  See “Nuclear Trust Funds” section of Note 1.

The following is a summary of nuclear trust fund investments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Other-Than-
Temporary
Impairments
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Other-Than-
Temporary
Impairments
 
(in thousands)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
19,966

 
$

 
$

 
$
18,804

 
$

 
$

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government
697,042

 
44,615

 
(5,016
)
 
608,875

 
26,114

 
(3,824
)
Corporate Debt
47,792

 
4,523

 
(1,018
)
 
36,782

 
2,450

 
(1,123
)
State and Local Government
208,553

 
1,206

 
(319
)
 
254,638

 
748

 
(370
)
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities
953,387

 
50,344

 
(6,353
)
 
900,295

 
29,312

 
(5,317
)
Equity Securities – Domestic
1,122,379

 
598,788

 
(79,142
)
 
1,012,511

 
505,538

 
(81,677
)
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
$
2,095,732

 
$
649,132

 
$
(85,495
)
 
$
1,931,610

 
$
534,850

 
$
(86,994
)

The following table provides the securities activity within the decommissioning and SNF trusts for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Proceeds from Investment Sales
$
1,031,793

 
$
858,406

 
$
987,550

Purchases of Investments
1,086,437

 
909,998

 
1,045,422

Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales
32,305

 
18,326

 
24,605

Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales
15,410

 
8,108

 
8,881



350


The adjusted cost of fixed income securities was $903 million and $872 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The adjusted cost of equity securities was $524 million and $506 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.

The fair value of fixed income securities held in the nuclear trust funds, summarized by contractual maturities, as of December 31, 2014 was as follows:
 
Fair Value of
Fixed Income
Securities
 
(in thousands)
Within 1 year
$
154,447

1 year – 5 years
376,291

5 years – 10 years
178,436

After 10 years
244,213

Total
$
953,387



351


Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Liabilities

For a discussion of fair value accounting and the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy, see the “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” section of Note 1.

The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 .  As required by the accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.  There have not been any significant changes in management’s valuation techniques.

APCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a)
$
15,599

 
$

 
$

 
$
33

 
$
15,632

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
206

 
20,197

 
17,654

 
(9,374
)
 
28,683

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
15,805

 
$
20,197

 
$
17,654

 
$
(9,341
)
 
$
44,315

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
227

 
$
20,339

 
$
1,912

 
$
(9,404
)
 
$
13,074


APCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a)
$
2,714

 
$

 
$

 
$
36

 
$
2,750

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
827

 
54,448

 
12,097

 
(29,616
)
 
37,756

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
389

 

 
(26
)
 
363

Total Risk Management Assets
827

 
54,837

 
12,097

 
(29,642
)
 
38,119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
3,541

 
$
54,837

 
$
12,097

 
$
(29,606
)
 
$
40,869

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
700

 
$
49,220

 
$
1,535

 
$
(32,609
)
 
$
18,846

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
313

 

 
(26
)
 
287

Total Risk Management Liabilities
$
700

 
$
49,533

 
$
1,535

 
$
(32,635
)
 
$
19,133



352


I&M

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
140

 
$
15,893

 
$
16,008

 
$
(6,396
)
 
$
25,645

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (d)
9,418

 

 

 
10,548

 
19,966

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government

 
697,042

 

 

 
697,042

Corporate Debt

 
47,792

 

 

 
47,792

State and Local Government

 
208,553

 

 

 
208,553

Subtotal Fixed Income Securities

 
953,387

 

 

 
953,387

Equity Securities – Domestic (e)
1,122,379

 

 

 

 
1,122,379

Total   Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
1,131,797

 
953,387

 

 
10,548

 
2,095,732

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
1,131,937

 
$
969,280

 
$
16,008

 
$
4,152

 
$
2,121,377

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
154

 
$
11,440

 
$
1,304

 
$
(6,280
)
 
$
6,618



353


I&M

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
561

 
$
38,667

 
$
8,205

 
$
(20,766
)
 
$
26,667

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
234

 

 
(18
)
 
216

Total Risk Management Assets
561

 
38,901

 
8,205

 
(20,784
)
 
26,883

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (d)
8,082

 

 

 
10,722

 
18,804

Fixed Income Securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Government

 
608,875

 

 

 
608,875

Corporate Debt

 
36,782

 

 

 
36,782

State and Local Government

 
254,638

 

 

 
254,638

Subtotal Fixed Income Securities

 
900,295

 

 

 
900,295

Equity Securities – Domestic (e)
1,012,511

 

 

 

 
1,012,511

Total   Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
1,020,593

 
900,295

 

 
10,722

 
1,931,610

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
1,021,154

 
$
939,196

 
$
8,205

 
$
(10,062
)
 
$
1,958,493

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$
475

 
$
35,061

 
$
1,041

 
$
(22,796
)
 
$
13,781

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
212

 

 
(18
)
 
194

Total Risk Management Liabilities
$
475

 
$
35,273

 
$
1,041

 
$
(22,814
)
 
$
13,975



354


OPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a)
$
408

 
$

 
$

 
$
28,288

 
$
28,696

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)

 

 
52,343

 
1

 
52,344

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
408

 
$

 
$
52,343

 
$
28,289

 
$
81,040

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
1,116

 
$
3,941

 
$
(101
)
 
$
4,956


OPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a)
$
19,387

 
$

 
$

 
$
12

 
$
19,399

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)

 

 
3,269

 
(349
)
 
2,920

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
162

 

 

 
162

Total Risk Management Assets

 
162

 
3,269

 
(349
)
 
3,082

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
19,387

 
$
162

 
$
3,269

 
$
(337
)
 
$
22,481

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$

 
$
349

 
$
(349
)
 
$



355


PSO

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$

 
$
360

 
$
(360
)
 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
595

 
$
737

 
$
(414
)
 
$
918


PSO

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
1,078

 
$

 
$
5

 
$
1,083

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
84

 

 

 
84

Total Risk Management Assets
$

 
$
1,162

 
$

 
$
5

 
$
1,167

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
81

 
$

 
$
4

 
$
85


356


SWEPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a)
$
12,660

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,696

 
$
14,356

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)

 
31

 
439

 
(439
)
 
31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
12,660

 
$
31

 
$
439

 
$
1,257

 
$
14,387

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
684

 
$
899

 
$
(501
)
 
$
1,082


SWEPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Other
 
Total
Assets:
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a)
$
15,871

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,370

 
$
17,241

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)

 
1,233

 

 
(151
)
 
1,082

Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity Hedges (b)

 
97

 

 

 
97

Total Risk Management Assets

 
1,330

 

 
(151
)
 
1,179

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
15,871

 
$
1,330

 
$

 
$
1,219

 
$
18,420

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (b) (c)
$

 
$
154

 
$

 
$
(154
)
 
$


(a)
Amounts in "Other" column primarily represent cash deposits in bank accounts with financial institutions or with third parties. Level 1 amounts primarily represent investment in money market funds.
(b)
Amounts in “Other” column primarily represent counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral under the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”
(c)
Substantially comprised of power contracts for APCo, I&M and OPCo and coal contracts for PSO and SWEPCo.
(d)
Amounts in “Other” column primarily represent accrued interest receivables from financial institutions.  Level 1 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(e)
Amounts represent publicly traded equity securities and equity-based mutual funds.

There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .


357


The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of net trading derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
10,562

 
$
7,164

 
$
2,920

 
$

 
$

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
29,694

 
18,593

 
30,768

 

 

Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
(32,584
)
 
(20,553
)
 
(33,688
)
 

 

Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
(3,648
)
 
(2,475
)
 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(32
)
 
(22
)
 

 

 

Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
11,750

 
11,997

 
48,402

 
(377
)
 
(460
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
15,742

 
$
14,704

 
$
48,402

 
$
(377
)
 
$
(460
)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
$
10,979

 
$
7,541

 
$
15,429

 
$

 
$

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
(3,568
)
 
(2,466
)
 
(5,042
)
 

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)
 

 

 
328

 

 

Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
481

 
390

 
765

 

 

Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
1,340

 
911

 
1,874

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(925
)
 
(637
)
 
(1,303
)
 

 

Transfer of OPCo Generation to Parent
 

 

 
(12,051
)
 

 

Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
2,255

 
1,425

 
2,920

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
10,562

 
$
7,164

 
$
2,920

 
$

 
$


358


Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2011
 
$
1,971

 
$
1,263

 
$
2,666

 
$

 
$

Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)
 
(5,204
)
 
(3,554
)
 
(7,452
)
 

 

Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)
 

 

 
5,401

 

 

Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income
 
23

 
13

 
28

 

 

Purchases, Issuances and Settlements (c)
 
11,200

 
7,734

 
16,214

 

 

Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)
 
1,392

 
860

 
1,909

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (f)
 
(1,930
)
 
(1,144
)
 
(2,527
)
 

 

Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (g)
 
3,527

 
2,369

 
(810
)
 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
$
10,979

 
$
7,541

 
$
15,429

 
$

 
$


(a)
Included in revenues on the statements of income.
(b)
Represents the change in fair value between the beginning of the reporting period and the settlement of the risk management commodity contract.
(c)
Represents the settlement of risk management commodity contracts for the reporting period.
(d)
Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 2.
(e)
Transfers are recognized based on their value at the beginning of the reporting period that the transfer occurred.
(f)
Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 3.
(g)
Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory assets/liabilities.


359


The following tables quantify the significant unobservable inputs used in developing the fair value of Level 3 positions as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Forward Price Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
5,801

 
$
1,799

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
13.43

 
$
123.02

 
$
52.47

FTRs
11,853

 
113

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
(14.63
)
 
20.02

 
1.01

Total
$
17,654

 
$
1,912

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2013
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
Forward Price Range
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
9,359

 
$
960

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
13.04

 
$
80.50

FTRs
2,738

 
575

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
(5.10
)
 
10.44

Total
$
12,097

 
$
1,535

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


360


Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Forward Price Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input(a)
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
6,375

 
$
1,219

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
13.43

 
$
123.02

 
$
52.47

FTRs
9,633

 
85

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
(14.63
)
 
20.02

 
1.01

Total
$
16,008

 
$
1,304

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2013
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
Forward Price Range
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
6,348

 
$
651

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
13.04

 
$
80.50

FTRs
1,857

 
390

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
(5.10
)
 
10.44

Total
$
8,205

 
$
1,041

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Forward Price Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Contracts
$
45,101

 
$
3,941

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
48.25

 
$
159.92

 
$
84.04

FTRs
7,242

 

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
(14.63
)
 
20.02

 
1.01

Total
$
52,343

 
$
3,941

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2013
OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
Forward Price Range
 
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FTRs
 
$
3,269

 
$
349

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
(5.10
)
 
$
10.44



361


Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Forward Price Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FTRs
$
360

 
$
737

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
(14.63
)
 
$
20.02

 
$
1.01


Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2014
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
Forward Price Range
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Technique
 
Input (a)
 
Low
 
High
 
Average
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FTRs
$
439

 
$
899

 
Discounted Cash Flow
 
Forward Market Price
 
$
(14.63
)
 
$
20.02

 
$
1.01


(a)
Represents market prices in dollars per MWh.

The following table provides sensitivity of fair value measurements to increases (decreases) in significant unobservable inputs related to Energy Contracts and FTRs for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014:

Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2014
Significant Unobservable Input
 
Position
 
Change in Input
 
Impact on Fair Value
Measurement
Forward Market Price
 
Buy
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Higher (Lower)
Forward Market Price
 
Sell
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Lower (Higher)

362


12 .   INCOME TAXES

The details of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ income taxes as reported are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Income Tax Expense (Credit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
$
10,926

 
$
14,273

 
$
58,057

 
$
(24,349
)
 
$
(171,629
)
Deferred
 
144,651

 
70,225

 
74,391

 
74,756

 
239,426

Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
(649
)
 
(4,877
)
 
(241
)
 
175

 
(1,377
)
Income Tax Expense
 
$
154,928

 
$
79,621

 
$
132,207

 
$
50,582

 
$
66,420

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Income Tax Expense (Credit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
$
58,441

 
$
(49,067
)
 
$
92,625

 
$
7,689

 
$
(10,866
)
Deferred
 
75,714

 
129,109

 
134,463

 
53,788

 
81,888

Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
(1,220
)
 
(4,931
)
 
(1,418
)
 
4,408

 
(1,561
)
Income Tax Expense
 
$
132,935

 
$
75,111

 
$
225,670

 
$
65,885

 
$
69,461

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Income Tax Expense (Credit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current
 
$
28,307

 
$
(9,221
)
 
$
100,447

 
$
18,634

 
$
(214,353
)
Deferred
 
138,460

 
53,067

 
45,685

 
48,916

 
260,761

Deferred Investment Tax Credits
 
(1,240
)
 
(4,502
)
 
(1,849
)
 
(856
)
 
(550
)
Income Tax Expense
 
$
165,527

 
$
39,344

 
$
144,283

 
$
66,694

 
$
45,858


Shown below for each Registrant Subsidiary is a reconciliation of the difference between the amounts of federal income taxes computed by multiplying book income before income taxes by the federal statutory tax rate and the amount of income taxes reported:
APCo
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Net Income
$
215,415
 
 
$
193,211
 
 
$
257,503
 
Income Tax Expense
154,928
 
 
132,935
 
 
165,527
 
Pretax Income
$
370,343
 
 
$
326,146
 
 
$
423,030
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
129,620
 
 
$
114,151
 
 
$
148,061
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Resulting from the Following Items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
23,527
 
 
20,286
 
 
20,424
 
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(649
)
 
(1,220
)
 
(1,240
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
6,531
 
 
2,707
 
 
3,175
 
Removal Costs
(6,844
)
 
(6,454
)
 
(6,641
)
AFUDC
(3,768
)
 
(1,420
)
 
(1,145
)
Valuation Allowance
(2,498
)
 
5,062
 
 
5,674
 
Other
9,009
 
 
(177
)
 
(2,781
)
Income Tax Expense
$
154,928
 
 
$
132,935
 
 
$
165,527
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
41.8

%

 
40.8

%

 
39.1

%


363


I&M
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Net Income
$
155,647
 
 
$
177,504
 
 
$
118,457
 
Income Tax Expense
79,621
 
 
75,111
 
 
39,344
 
Pretax Income
$
235,268
 
 
$
252,615
 
 
$
157,801
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
82,344
 
 
$
88,415
 
 
$
55,230
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Resulting from the Following Items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
12,885
 
 
10,057
 
 
8,659
 
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(4,877
)
 
(4,931
)
 
(4,502
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
7,668
 
 
(882
)
 
(1,559
)
Removal Costs
(11,272
)
 
(9,432
)
 
(5,490
)
AFUDC
(9,994
)
 
(10,555
)
 
(7,218
)
Other
2,867
 
 
2,439
 
 
(5,776
)
Income Tax Expense
$
79,621
 
 
$
75,111
 
 
$
39,344
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
33.8

%

 
29.7

%

 
24.9

%

OPCo
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Net Income
$
216,422
 
 
$
409,980
 
 
$
343,534
 
Income Tax Expense
132,207
 
 
225,670
 
 
144,283
 
Pretax Income
$
348,629
 
 
$
635,650
 
 
$
487,817
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
122,020
 
 
$
222,478
 
 
$
170,736
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Resulting from the Following Items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
6,665
 
 
6,759
 
 
5,239
 
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(241
)
 
(1,418
)
 
(1,849
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
8,866
 
 
3,327
 
 
(18,291
)
Parent Company Loss Benefit
(996
)
 
(2,154
)
 
(11,915
)
Other
(4,107
)
 
(3,322
)
 
363
 
Income Tax Expense
$
132,207
 
 
$
225,670
 
 
$
144,283
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
37.9

%

 
35.5

%

 
29.6

%

PSO
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Net Income
$
86,929
 
 
$
97,796
 
 
$
114,141
 
Income Tax Expense
50,582
 
 
65,885
 
 
66,694
 
Pretax Income
$
137,511
 
 
$
163,681
 
 
$
180,835
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
48,129
 
 
$
57,288
 
 
$
63,292
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Resulting from the Following Items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
176
 
 
164
 
 
(10
)
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(770
)
 
(776
)
 
(781
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
4,777
 
 
5,423
 
 
6,953
 
Tax Adjustments
(1,241
)
 
5,268
 
 
201
 
Other
(489
)
 
(1,482
)
 
(2,961
)
Income Tax Expense
$
50,582
 
 
$
65,885
 
 
$
66,694
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
36.8

%

 
40.3

%

 
36.9

%


364


SWEPCo
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Net Income
$
144,559
 
 
$
153,819
 
 
$
202,513
 
Income Tax Expense
66,420
 
 
69,461
 
 
45,858
 
Pretax Income
$
210,979
 
 
$
223,280
 
 
$
248,371
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income Taxes on Pretax Income at Statutory Rate (35%)
$
73,843
 
 
$
78,148
 
 
$
86,930
 
Increase (Decrease) in Income Taxes Resulting from the Following Items:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
2,944
 
 
3,086
 
 
2,105
 
Depletion
(4,143
)
 
(3,472
)
 
(3,276
)
Investment Tax Credits, Net
(1,377
)
 
(1,561
)
 
(550
)
State and Local Income Taxes, Net
3,083
 
 
(1,453
)
 
(18,010
)
AFUDC
(4,182
)
 
(2,381
)
 
(19,879
)
Other
(3,748
)
 
(2,906
)
 
(1,462
)
Income Tax Expense
$
66,420
 
 
$
69,461
 
 
$
45,858
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
31.5

%

 
31.1

%

 
18.5

%


The following tables show elements of the net deferred tax liability and significant temporary differences for each Registrant Subsidiary:
APCo
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
446,346

 
$
548,966

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(2,711,233
)
 
(2,788,306
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(2,264,887
)
 
$
(2,239,340
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(1,801,885
)
 
$
(1,725,853
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(70,417
)
 
(94,775
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(239,724
)
 
(246,247
)
Regulatory Assets
(113,671
)
 
(104,824
)
Securitized Assets
(122,559
)
 
(130,834
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
(2,710
)
 
(1,589
)
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
9,796

 
45,177

Tax Credit Carryforward
46,162

 
21,940

Valuation Allowance

 
(41,277
)
All Other, Net
30,121

 
38,942

Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(2,264,887
)
 
$
(2,239,340
)
I&M
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
911,811

 
$
843,630

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(2,190,002
)
 
(2,043,810
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,278,191
)
 
$
(1,200,180
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(418,724
)
 
$
(390,829
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(40,580
)
 
(39,137
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(138,907
)
 
(137,162
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
7,732

 
8,351

Accrued Nuclear Decommissioning
(610,955
)
 
(553,794
)
Net Operating Loss Carryforward

 
15,690

Regulatory Assets
(74,690
)
 
(59,008
)
All Other, Net
(2,067
)
 
(44,291
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,278,191
)
 
$
(1,200,180
)

365


OPCo
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
171,816

 
$
183,085

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(1,528,130
)
 
(1,477,691
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,356,314
)
 
$
(1,294,606
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(926,520
)
 
$
(841,607
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(47,598
)
 
(51,946
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(34,232
)
 
(28,569
)
Regulatory Assets
(242,391
)
 
(215,535
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
(3,016
)
 
(3,812
)
Deferred Fuel and Purchased Power
(145,515
)
 
(176,192
)
All Other, Net
42,958

 
23,055

Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,356,314
)
 
$
(1,294,606
)
PSO
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
110,758

 
$
107,567

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(1,016,721
)
 
(936,791
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(905,963
)
 
$
(829,224
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(805,193
)
 
$
(736,160
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(678
)
 
(31
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(109,285
)
 
(99,126
)
Regulatory Assets
(39,620
)
 
(39,414
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
(2,661
)
 
(3,100
)
Deferred Federal Income Taxes on Deferred State Income Taxes
43,918

 
40,362

Net Operating Loss Carryforward
6,365

 
4,314

Tax Credit Carryforward
681

 
565

All Other, Net
510

 
3,366

Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(905,963
)
 
$
(829,224
)
SWEPCo
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
$
186,176

 
$
359,529

Deferred Tax Liabilities
(1,528,246
)
 
(1,453,710
)
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,342,070
)
 
$
(1,094,181
)
 
 
 
 
Property Related Temporary Differences
$
(1,235,136
)
 
$
(1,172,431
)
Amounts Due from Customers for Future Federal Income Taxes
(44,119
)
 
(43,116
)
Deferred State Income Taxes
(124,147
)
 
(118,179
)
Regulatory Assets
(19,388
)
 
(5,290
)
Deferred Income Taxes on Other Comprehensive Loss
4,021

 
4,548

Impairment Loss - Turk Plant
21,052

 
21,295

Net Operating Loss Carryforward
21,925

 
189,128

All Other, Net
33,722

 
29,864

Net Deferred Tax Liabilities
$
(1,342,070
)
 
$
(1,094,181
)


366


AEP System Tax Allocation Agreement

The Registrant Subsidiaries join in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with their affiliates in the AEP System.  The allocation of the AEP System’s current consolidated federal income tax to the AEP System companies allocates the benefit of current tax losses to the AEP System companies giving rise to such losses in determining their current tax expense.  The tax benefit of the Parent is allocated to its subsidiaries with taxable income.  With the exception of the loss of the Parent, the method of allocation reflects a separate return result for each company in the consolidated group.

Federal and State Income Tax Audit Status

The Registrant Subsidiaries are no longer subject to U.S. federal examination for years before 2011.  The IRS examination of years 2011, 2012 and 2013 started in April 2014. Although the outcome of tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion, adequate provisions for federal income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such matters.  In addition, the Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest on these uncertain tax positions.  Management is not aware of any issues for open tax years that upon final resolution are expected to materially impact net income.

The Registrant Subsidiaries file income tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions.  These taxing authorities routinely examine their tax returns and the Registrant Subsidiaries are currently under examination in several state and local jurisdictions.  However, it is possible that previously filed tax returns have positions that may be challenged by these tax authorities.  Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such challenges and that the ultimate resolution of these audits will not materially impact net income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries are no longer subject to state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009.

Net Income Tax Operating Loss Carryforward

In 2011, APCo and I&M recognized federal net income tax operating losses of $313 million and $123 million , respectively, driven primarily by bonus depreciation, pension plan contributions and other book versus tax temporary differences.  In 2012, SWEPCo recognized a federal net income tax operating loss of $858 million driven primarily by bonus depreciation.  APCo, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo also have state net income tax operating loss carryforwards as indicated in the table below:
Company
 
State
 
State Net Income
Tax Operating
Loss
Carryforward
 
Year of
Expiration
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
APCo
 
Tennessee
 
$
2,695

 
2026
APCo
 
West Virginia
 
235,341

 
2032
OPCo
 
West Virginia
 
50,228

 
2032
PSO
 
Oklahoma
 
163,212

 
2034
SWEPCo
 
Louisiana
 
419,384

 
2029
SWEPCo
 
Oklahoma
 
2,994

 
2034

As a result, APCo, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo recognized deferred state and local income tax benefits in 2011, and/or 2012, and/or 2013 and/or 2014.  At the end of 2013, APCo, I&M and SWEPCo had $12 million , $13 million and $167 million , respectively, of unrealized federal net operating loss carryforward.  Federal taxable income was sufficient enough in 2014 that these remaining federal net income tax operating loss tax benefits were realized in full.  Management also anticipates future taxable income will be sufficient to realize the remaining state net income tax operating loss tax benefits before the state carryforward expires for each state.


367


Tax Credit Carryforward

Federal and state net income tax operating losses sustained in 2011 and 2009 along with lower federal and state taxable income in 2010 resulted in unused federal and state income tax credits.  As of December 31, 2014, the Registrant Subsidiaries have federal tax credit carryforwards and PSO has state tax credit carryforwards as indicated in the table below.  If these credits are not utilized, federal general business tax credits will expire in the years 2029 through 2033 .
Company
 
Total Federal
Tax Credit
Carryforward
 
Federal Tax
Credit
Carryforward
Subject to
Expiration
 
Total State
Tax Credit
Carryforward
 
State Tax
Credit
Carryforward
Subject to
Expiration
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
45,654

 
$
4,046

 
$

 
$

I&M
 
3,418

 
2,877

 

 

OPCo
 
25,679

 
1,962

 

 

PSO
 
681

 
660

 
22,141

 
22,141

SWEPCo
 
3,254

 
899

 

 


The Registrant Subsidiaries anticipate future federal taxable income will be sufficient to realize the tax benefits of the federal tax credits before they expire unused.  In November 2014, APCo received an order from the Virginia SCC for its 2014 Virginia Biennial Base Rate Case (see Note 4 ). As a result of the final determination pertaining to the ability to realize future tax benefits for certain state net income tax operating loss and credit carryforwards, management determined that APCo is subject to the Virginia Minimum Tax on electric suppliers and the Virginia State Income Tax is no longer applicable. As a result, management derecognized the related state income tax benefits, which had been subject to valuation allowances.


368


Uncertain Tax Positions

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize interest accruals related to uncertain tax positions in interest income or expense as applicable and penalties in Other Operation expense in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Income Taxes.”

The following tables show amounts reported for interest expense, interest income and reversal of prior period interest expense:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Company
 
Interest
Expense
 
Interest
Income
 
Reversal of
Prior Period
Interest
Expense
 
Interest
Expense
 
Interest
Income
 
Reversal of
Prior Period
Interest
Expense
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$

 
$

 
$
193

 
$

 
$
1,089

 
$

I&M
 

 

 
289

 

 
597

 

OPCo
 
129

 

 
245

 

 
1,892

 

PSO
 
88

 

 
137

 

 
135

 

SWEPCo
 
172

 

 
154

 
215

 

 

 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
Company
 
Interest
Expense
 
Interest
Income
 
Reversal of
Prior Period
Interest
Expense
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
62

 
$

 
$
183

I&M
 
1,355

 

 

OPCo
 
266

 

 
504

PSO
 
259

 

 
294

SWEPCo
 
286

 

 
271


The following table shows balances for amounts accrued for the receipt of interest:
 
 
December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$

 
$

I&M
 

 

OPCo
 

 

PSO
 

 
209

SWEPCo
 

 
172


The following table shows balances for amounts accrued for the payment of interest and penalties:
 
 
December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$

 
$
158

I&M
 
526

 
957

OPCo
 
382

 
407

PSO
 
310

 
562

SWEPCo
 
1,010

 
1,167



369


The reconciliations of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
$
1,164

 
$
3,164

 
$
2,086

 
$
2,184

 
$
7,602

Increase  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period

 
1,431

 
6,335

 
64

 
1,602

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period

 

 

 
(18
)
 
(832
)
Increase  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 

 

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 

 

Increase  Settlements with Taxing Authorities
1

 

 
70

 
37

 

Decrease  Settlements with Taxing Authorities

 
(660
)
 

 

 
(30
)
Decrease  Lapse of the Applicable Statute of Limitations
(1,165
)
 
(1,640
)
 
(1,566
)
 
(948
)
 
(845
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$

 
$
2,295

 
$
6,925

 
$
1,319

 
$
7,497

 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2013
$
5,253

 
$
15,085

 
$
11,052

 
$
2,273

 
$
9,553

Increase  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period

 

 

 

 

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period
(4,089
)
 
(11,921
)
 
(8,966
)
 
(103
)
 
(3,158
)
Increase  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 
14

 
1,301

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 

 

Decrease  Settlements with Taxing Authorities

 

 

 

 
(94
)
Decrease  Lapse of the Applicable Statute of Limitations

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013
$
1,164

 
$
3,164

 
$
2,086

 
$
2,184

 
$
7,602

 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2012
$
7,311

 
$
14,071

 
$
43,565

 
$
3,585

 
$
9,031

Increase  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period

 
2,266

 
1,360

 
421

 
2,806

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During a Prior Period
(384
)
 
(1,252
)
 
(13,582
)
 
(92
)
 
(775
)
Increase  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 

 

Decrease  Tax Positions Taken During the Current Year

 

 

 

 

Decrease  Settlements with Taxing Authorities
(1,674
)
 

 
(20,291
)
 

 

Decrease  Lapse of the Applicable Statute of Limitations

 

 

 
(1,641
)
 
(1,509
)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
5,253

 
$
15,085

 
$
11,052

 
$
2,273

 
$
9,553



370


Management believes that there will be no significant net increase or decrease in unrecognized benefits within 12 months of the reporting date.  The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate for each Registrant Subsidiary was as follows:
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$

 
$

 
$

I&M
 
1,591

 
1,220

 
1,220

OPCo
 
4,462

 
674

 
674

PSO
 
858

 
827

 
818

SWEPCo
 
4,873

 
4,357

 
3,512


Federal Tax Legislation – Affecting APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the 2012 Act) was enacted in January 2013.  Included in the 2012 Act was a one-year extension of 50% bonus depreciation.  The 2012 Act also retroactively extended the life of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits, which expired at the end of 2011.  The enacted provisions did not materially impact the Registrant Subsidiaries’ net income or financial condition but did have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2013.

The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (the 2014 Act) was enacted in December 2014. Included in the 2014 Act was a one-year extension of the 50% bonus depreciation. The 2014 Act also retroactively extended the life of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits, which expired at the end of 2013. The enacted provisions did not materially impact the Registrant Subsidiaries' net income or financial condition but will have a favorable impact on future cash flows.

Federal Tax Regulations

In 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department issued final and re-proposed regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property, effective for the tax years beginning in 2014.  In addition, the IRS issued Revenue Procedures under the Industry Issue Resolutions program that provides specific guidance for the implementation of the regulations for the electric utility industry.  These final regulations did not materially impact the Registrant Subsidiaries' net income, cash flows or financial condition.

State Tax Legislation – Affecting APCo, I&M and OPCo

Legislation was passed by the state of Indiana in May 2011 enacting a phased reduction in corporate income tax rate from 8.5% to 6.5% .  The 8.5% Indiana corporate income tax rate will be reduced 0.5% each year beginning after June 30, 2012 with the final reduction occurring in years beginning after June 30, 2015.

In May 2011, Michigan repealed its Business Tax regime and replaced it with a traditional corporate net income tax rate of 6% , effective January 1, 2012.

During the third quarter of 2013, it was determined that the state of West Virginia had achieved certain minimum levels of shortfall reserve funds.  As a result, the West Virginia corporate income tax rate was reduced from 7% to 6.5% in 2014.  

The enacted provisions did not materially impact the Registrant Subsidiaries’ net income, cash flows or financial condition.

371


13 .   LEASES

Leases of property, plant and equipment are for remaining periods up to 35 years and require payments of related property taxes, maintenance and operating costs.  The majority of the leases have purchase or renewal options and will be renewed or replaced by other leases.

Lease rentals for both operating and capital leases are generally charged to Other Operation and Maintenance expense in accordance with rate-making treatment for regulated operations.  Additionally, for regulated operations with capital leases, a capital lease asset and offsetting liability are recorded at the present value of the remaining lease payments for each reporting period.  Capital leases for nonregulated property are accounted for as if the assets were owned and financed.  The components of rental costs are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Net Lease Expense on Operating Leases
 
$
18,348

 
$
93,440

 
$
6,610

 
$
3,171

 
$
5,465

Amortization of Capital Leases
 
5,525

 
44,369

 
5,714

 
4,227

 
14,960

Interest on Capital Leases
 
1,012

 
2,834

 
1,189

 
747

 
7,369

Total Lease Rental Costs
 
$
24,885

 
$
140,643

 
$
13,513

 
$
8,145

 
$
27,794

Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Net Lease Expense on Operating Leases
 
$
17,500

 
$
95,606

 
$
57,814

 
$
4,131

 
$
6,328

Amortization of Capital Leases
 
6,293

 
11,307

 
7,800

 
4,099

 
15,456

Interest on Capital Leases
 
1,410

 
1,870

 
4,125

 
782

 
8,153

Total Lease Rental Costs
 
$
25,203

 
$
108,783

 
$
69,739

 
$
9,012

 
$
29,937

Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Net Lease Expense on Operating Leases
 
$
15,633

 
$
95,509

 
$
59,836

 
$
5,283

 
$
5,797

Amortization of Capital Leases
 
7,429

 
8,429

 
10,906

 
3,839

 
14,793

Interest on Capital Leases
 
1,782

 
1,738

 
3,307

 
815

 
9,041

Total Lease Rental Costs
 
$
24,844

 
$
105,676

 
$
74,049

 
$
9,937

 
$
29,631



372


The following table shows the property, plant and equipment under capital leases and related obligations recorded on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets.  Unless shown as a separate line on the balance sheet due to materiality, current capital lease obligations are included in Other Current Liabilities and long-term capital lease obligations are included in Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets.
December 31, 2014
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
$
14,166

 
$
18,681

 
$

 
$
9,625

 
$
35,442

Other Property, Plant and Equipment
 
19,414

 
100,419

 
22,569

 
16,472

 
159,472

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
33,580

 
119,100

 
22,569

 
26,097

 
194,914

Accumulated Amortization
 
14,040

 
15,956

 
8,003

 
11,796

 
80,155

Net Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases
 
$
19,540

 
$
103,144

 
$
14,566

 
$
14,301

 
$
114,759

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations Under Capital Leases:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Liability
 
$
14,435

 
$
61,094

 
$
10,996

 
$
10,929

 
$
91,044

Liability Due Within One Year
 
5,105

 
42,050

 
3,570

 
3,372

 
17,557

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
$
19,540

 
$
103,144

 
$
14,566

 
$
14,301

 
$
108,601

December 31, 2013
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Generation
 
$
13,531

 
$
18,324

 
$

 
$
9,675

 
$
34,476

Other Property, Plant and Equipment
 
18,720

 
130,249

 
26,532

 
15,413

 
157,853

Total Property, Plant and Equipment
 
32,251

 
148,573

 
26,532

 
25,088

 
192,329

Accumulated Amortization
 
11,379

 
15,356

 
9,800

 
10,957

 
66,637

Net Property, Plant and Equipment Under Capital Leases
 
$
20,872

 
$
133,217

 
$
16,732

 
$
14,131

 
$
125,692

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligations Under Capital Leases:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent Liability
 
$
15,718

 
$
87,000

 
$
11,212

 
$
10,222

 
$
105,086

Liability Due Within One Year
 
5,154

 
46,210

 
5,520

 
3,909

 
17,899

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Obligations Under Capital Leases
 
$
20,872

 
$
133,210

 
$
16,732

 
$
14,131

 
$
122,985



373


Future minimum lease payments consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014 :
Capital Leases
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
5,668

 
$
42,724

 
$
4,140

 
$
4,001

 
$
23,721

2016
 
5,063

 
35,817

 
3,634

 
3,575

 
20,700

2017
 
4,171

 
11,419

 
3,381

 
3,425

 
21,863

2018
 
3,166

 
6,025

 
2,854

 
2,391

 
11,751

2019
 
1,146

 
2,718

 
747

 
1,173

 
10,463

Later Years
 
1,815

 
22,467

 
1,489

 
1,925

 
46,016

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
21,029

 
121,170

 
16,245

 
16,490

 
134,514

Less Estimated Interest Element
 
1,489

 
18,026

 
1,679

 
2,189

 
25,913

Estimated Present Value of Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
19,540

 
$
103,144

 
$
14,566

 
$
14,301

 
$
108,601

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncancelable Operating Leases
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
15,817

 
$
95,357

 
$
13,471

 
$
3,031

 
$
5,392

2016
 
15,101

 
89,448

 
9,575

 
2,922

 
4,679

2017
 
14,669

 
87,031

 
9,036

 
2,760

 
4,225

2018
 
13,886

 
85,858

 
7,906

 
2,391

 
3,754

2019
 
11,818

 
85,130

 
6,765

 
1,800

 
3,457

Later Years
 
42,866

 
262,263

 
24,743

 
5,094

 
14,819

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
114,157

 
$
705,087

 
$
71,496

 
$
17,998

 
$
36,326


Master Lease Agreements

The Registrant Subsidiaries lease certain equipment under master lease agreements.  Under the lease agreements, the lessor is guaranteed a residual value up to a stated percentage of either the unamortized balance or the equipment cost at the end of the lease term.  If the actual fair value of the leased equipment is below the guaranteed residual value at the end of the lease term, the Registrant Subsidiaries are committed to pay the difference between the actual fair value and the residual value guarantee.  Historically, at the end of the lease term the fair value has been in excess of the unamortized balance.  As of December 31, 2014 , the maximum potential loss by Registrant Subsidiary for these lease agreements assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the lease term is as follows:
Company
 
Maximum
Potential Loss
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
4,026

I&M
 
2,861

OPCo
 
4,829

PSO
 
2,214

SWEPCo
 
2,774



374


Rockport Lease

AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction in 1989 with Wilmington Trust Company (Owner Trustee), an unrelated, unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 (the Plant).  The Owner Trustee was capitalized with equity from six owner participants with no relationship to AEP or any of its subsidiaries and debt from a syndicate of banks and securities in a private placement to certain institutional investors.

The gain from the sale was deferred and is being amortized over the term of the lease, which expires in 2022.  The Owner Trustee owns the Plant and leases it equally to AEGCo and I&M.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease with the payment obligations included in the future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.  The lease term is for 33 years with potential renewal options.  At the end of the lease term, AEGCo and I&M have the option to renew the lease or the Owner Trustee can sell the Plant.  AEP, AEGCo and I&M have no ownership interest in the Owner Trustee and do not guarantee its debt.  I&M’s future minimum lease payments for this sale-and-leaseback transaction as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:
Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
I&M
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
73,854

2016
 
73,854

2017
 
73,854

2018
 
73,854

2019
 
73,854

Later Years
 
221,562

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
590,832


Railcar Lease

In June 2003, AEP Transportation LLC (AEP Transportation), a subsidiary of AEP, entered into an agreement with BTM Capital Corporation, as lessor, to lease 875 coal-transporting aluminum railcars.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease.  In January 2008, AEP Transportation assigned the remaining 848 railcars under the original lease agreement to I&M (390 railcars) and SWEPCo (458 railcars).  The assignment is accounted for as operating leases for I&M and SWEPCo.  The initial lease term was five years with three consecutive five-year renewal periods for a maximum lease term of twenty years.  I&M and SWEPCo intend to renew these leases for the full lease term of twenty years via the renewal options.  The future minimum lease obligations are $11 million and $13 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, for the remaining railcars as of December 31, 2014 .  These obligations are included in the future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.

Under the lease agreement, the lessor is guaranteed that the sale proceeds under a return-and-sale option will equal at least a lessee obligation amount specified in the lease, which declines from approximately 83% of the projected fair value of the equipment under the current five-year lease term to 77% at the end of the 20-year term.  I&M and SWEPCo have assumed the guarantee under the return-and-sale option.  The maximum potential losses related to the guarantee are approximately $9 million and $10 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the current five-year lease term.  However, management believes that the fair value would produce a sufficient sales price to avoid any loss.


375


Sabine Dragline Lease

During 2009, Sabine entered into capital lease arrangements with a nonaffiliated company to finance the purchase of two electric draglines to be used for Sabine’s mining operations totaling $47 million .  The amounts included in the lease represented the aggregate fair value of the existing equipment and a sale-and-leaseback transaction for additional dragline rebuild costs required to keep the dragline operational.  These capital lease assets are included in Other Property, Plant and Equipment on SWEPCo’s December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets.  The short-term and long-term capital lease obligations are included in Obligations Under Capital Leases on SWEPCo’s December 31, 2014 and 2013 balance sheets.  The future payment obligations are included in SWEPCo’s future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.

I&M Nuclear Fuel Lease

In November 2013, I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction with IMP 11-2013, a nonaffiliated Ohio trust, to lease nuclear fuel for I&M’s Cook Plant.  In November 2013, I&M sold a portion of its unamortized nuclear fuel inventory to the trust for $110 million .  The lease has a variable rate based on one month LIBOR and is accounted for as a capital lease with lease terms up to 54 months .  The future payment obligations of $67 million are included in I&M’s future minimum lease payments schedule earlier in this note.  The net capital lease asset is included in Other Property, Plant and Equipment and the short-term and long-term capital lease obligations are included in Other Current Liabilities and Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, on I&M’s December 31, 2014 balance sheet.  The future minimum lease payments for the sale-and-leaseback transaction as of December 31, 2014 are as follows, based on estimated fuel burn:
Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
I&M
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
32,173

2016
 
26,879

2017
 
5,760

2018
 
2,397

Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
 
$
67,209


376


14 .   FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Long-term Debt

The following details long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 :
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate as of
 
Interest Rate Ranges as of
 
Outstanding as of
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
Company
 
Maturity
 
2014
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Senior Unsecured Notes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
2015-2044
 
5.80%
 
3.40%-7.95%
 
3.40%-7.95%
 
$
2,991,846

 
$
2,893,220

I&M
 
2015-2037
 
5.80%
 
3.20%-7.00%
 
3.20%-7.00%
 
1,246,683

 
1,246,235

OPCo
 
2014-2035
 
5.98%
 
5.375%-6.60%
 
4.85%-6.60%
 
1,945,036

 
2,169,487

PSO
 
2016-2037
 
5.52%
 
4.40%-6.625%
 
4.40%-6.625%
 
897,046

 
896,705

SWEPCo
 
2015-2040
 
5.56%
 
3.55%-6.45%
 
3.55%-6.45%
 
1,823,362

 
1,823,007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pollution Control Bonds (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
2014-2038 (b)
 
1.68%
 
0.04%-5.375%
 
0.05%-5.375%
 
532,500

 
532,500

I&M
 
2014-2025 (b)
 
1.80%
 
0.04%-4.625%
 
0.04%-6.25%
 
226,607

 
226,569

OPCo
 
2014-2038 (b)
 
3.85%
 
3.125%-5.80%
 
2.875%-5.80%
 
118,245

 
296,825

PSO
 
2014-2020
 
4.45%
 
4.45%
 
4.45%-5.25%
 
12,660

 
46,360

SWEPCo
 
2015-2018 (b)
 
4.28%
 
3.25%-4.95%
 
3.25%-4.95%
 
135,200

 
135,200

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes Payable – Affiliated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
2015
 
3.125%
 
3.125%
 
3.125%
 
86,000

 
86,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes Payable – Nonaffiliated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I&M
 
2014-2019
 
1.14%
 
0.983%-2.12%
 
1.164%-4.00%
 
176,697

 
177,540

SWEPCo
 
2024-2032
 
5.13%
 
4.58%-6.37%
 
4.58%-6.37%
 
81,875

 
85,125

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securitization Bonds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo
 
2024-2031
 
2.80%
 
2.008%-3.772%
 
2.008%-3.772%
 
367,606

 
380,282

OPCo
 
2018-2020
 
1.44%
 
0.958%-2.049%
 
0.958%-2.049%
 
232,467

 
267,403

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
265,502

 
265,391

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Long-term Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APCo (d)
 
2015-2026
 
13.718%
 
13.718%
 
1.188%-13.718%
 
2,322

 
302,355

I&M
 
2015-2025
 
2.28%
 
1.55%-6.00%
 
1.67%-6.00%
 
111,908

 
123,281

OPCo
 
2028
 
1.15%
 
1.15%
 
1.15%
 
1,375

 
1,460

PSO (e)
 
2016-2027
 
1.57%
 
1.482%-3.00%
 
1.491%-3.00%
 
131,330

 
56,745

SWEPCo (f)
 
2017
 
1.73%
 
1.73%
 
 
 
100,000

 


(a)
For certain series of pollution control bonds, interest rates are subject to periodic adjustment.  Certain series may be purchased on demand at periodic interest adjustment dates.  Letters of credit from banks and insurance policies support certain series.
(b)
Certain pollution control bonds are subject to redemption earlier than the maturity date.  Consequently, these bonds have been classified for maturity purposes as Long-term Debt Due Within One Year - Nonaffiliated on the balance sheets.
(c)
Spent nuclear fuel obligation consists of a liability along with accrued interest for disposal of spent nuclear fuel (see "SNF Disposal" section of Note 6 ).
(d)
In 2014, APCo retired a $300 million credit facility due in 2015 .
(e)
In 2014, PSO drew the remaining $75 million on an existing $125 million three-year credit facility.
(f)
In 2014, SWEPCo issued a $100 million three-year credit facility.


377


Long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 is payable as follows:
 
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
2015
 
$
638,212

 
$
382,187

 
$
131,497

 
$
427

 
$
306,750

2016
 
88,372

 
49,189

 
395,946

 
275,440

 
3,250

2017
 
273,492

 
37,131

 
46,387

 
454

 
353,250

2018
 
123,972

 
106,444

 
397,045

 
467

 
384,950

2019
 
94,463

 
479,353

 
48,016

 
250,482

 
403,250

After 2019
 
2,769,933

 
976,803

 
1,283,200

 
516,720

 
690,625

Principal Amount
 
3,988,444

 
2,031,107

 
2,302,091

 
1,043,990

 
2,142,075

Unamortized Discount, Net
 
(8,170
)
 
(3,710
)
 
(4,968
)
 
(2,954
)
 
(1,638
)
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding
 
$
3,980,274

 
$
2,027,397

 
$
2,297,123

 
$
1,041,036

 
$
2,140,437


In January 2015 and February 2015 , I&M retired $15 million and $8 million , respectively, of Notes Payable related to DCC Fuel.

In January 2015, OPCo retired $22 million of Securitization Bonds.

In January 2015, PSO issued $87.5 million of 3.17% and $87.5 million of 4.09% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2025 and 2045 , respectively.

In January 2015, SWEPCo remarketed $54 million of 1.6% Pollution Control Bonds due in 2019 .

In February 2015, APCo retired $11 million of Securitization Bonds.

As of December 31, 2014 , trustees held, on behalf of I&M and OPCo, $40 million and $345 million , respectively, of their reacquired Pollution Control Bonds.

Dividend Restrictions

The Registrant Subsidiaries pay dividends to Parent provided funds are legally available.  Various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements may impose certain restrictions on the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to transfer funds to Parent in the form of dividends.

Federal Power Act

The Federal Power Act prohibits each of the Registrant Subsidiaries from participating “in the making or paying of any dividends of such public utility from any funds properly included in capital account.”  The term “capital account” is not defined in the Federal Power Act or its regulations.  Management understands “capital account” to mean the book value of the common stock.

Additionally, the Federal Power Act creates a reserve on earnings attributable to hydroelectric generation plants.  Because of their respective ownership of such plants, this reserve applies to APCo and I&M.

None of these restrictions limit the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to pay dividends out of retained earnings.

Leverage Restrictions

Pursuant to the credit agreement leverage restrictions, APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo must maintain a percentage of debt to total capitalization at a level that does not exceed 67.5% .  As of December 31, 2014 , $50 million , $61 million and $277 million of I&M, PSO and SWEPCo's retained earnings, respectively, have restrictions related to the payment of dividends to Parent. None of APCo’s retained earnings have restrictions related to the payment of dividends to Parent.

378


Utility Money Pool – AEP System

The AEP System uses a corporate borrowing program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of AEP’s subsidiaries.  The corporate borrowing program includes a Utility Money Pool, which funds AEP’s utility subsidiaries, and a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds a majority of AEP’s nonutility subsidiaries.  The AEP System Utility Money Pool operates in accordance with the terms and conditions of the AEP System Utility Money Pool agreement filed with the FERC.   The amounts of outstanding loans to (borrowings from) the Utility Money Pool as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are included in Advances to Affiliates and Advances from Affiliates, respectively, on each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets.  The Utility Money Pool participants’ money pool activity and their corresponding authorized borrowing limits for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are described in the following tables:

Year Ended December 31, 2014 :
 
 
Maximum
 
 
 
Average
 
 
 
Net Loans to
 
 
 
 
Borrowings
 
Maximum
 
Borrowings
 
Average
 
(Borrowings from)
 
Authorized
 
 
from the
 
Loans to the
 
from the
 
Loans to the
 
the Utility Money
 
Short-term
 
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Pool as of
 
Borrowing
Company
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
December 31, 2014
 
Limit
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
44,215

 
$
542,186

 
$
12,566

 
$
104,469

 
$
48,519

 
$
600,000

I&M
 
150,714

 
158,857

 
73,192

 
39,118

 
(129,020
)
 
500,000

OPCo
 
120,264

 
405,350

 
34,841

 
107,275

 
312,473

 
400,000

PSO
 
176,950

 

 
93,732

 

 
(154,249
)
 
300,000

SWEPCo
 
153,503

 
51,319

 
71,009

 
24,392

 
41,033

 
350,000


Year Ended December 31, 2013 :
 
 
Maximum
 
 
 
Average
 
 
 
Net Loans to
 
 
 
 
Borrowings
 
Maximum
 
Borrowings
 
Average
 
(Borrowings from)
 
Authorized
 
 
from the
 
Loans to the
 
from the
 
Loans to the
 
the Utility Money
 
Short-term
 
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Utility
 
Pool as of
 
Borrowing
Company
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
Money Pool
 
December 31, 2013
 
Limit
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
331,771

 
$
202,377

 
$
141,128

 
$
28,659

 
$
92,485

 
$
600,000

I&M
 
23,135

 
403,905

 
8,308

 
256,730

 
55,863

 
500,000

OPCo
 
410,456

 
415,605

 
190,384

 
50,230

 
339,070

 
600,000

PSO
 
46,806

 
109,607

 
18,754

 
28,771

 
(36,772
)
 
300,000

SWEPCo
 
24,553

 
153,830

 
6,020

 
33,546

 
(9,180
)
 
350,000


The activity in the above table does not include short-term lending activity of OPCo’s former wholly-owned subsidiary, AGR.  In January 2013, AGR became a participant in the Nonutility Money Pool.  In November 2013, AGR’s participation in the Nonutility Money Pool ended as AGR became a direct borrower from Parent.  On December 31, 2013, OPCo contributed the assets and liabilities of AGR to Parent as part of corporate separation.  For the year ended December 31, 2013, AGR had the following activity in the Nonutility Money Pool or from Parent:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Borrowings
 
Year Ended
 
Maximum
 
Maximum
 
Average
 
Average
 
From as of
 
December 31, 2013
 
Borrowings From
 
Loans To
 
Borrowings From
 
Loans To
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Nonutility Money Pool
 
$
1,047

 
$
1,027

 
$
316

 
$
208

 
$

 
Parent
 
1,178

 

 
1,078

 

 

(a)

(a)
The borrowings of AGR from Parent as of December 31, 2013 are no longer associated with OPCo.


379


The maximum and minimum interest rates for funds either borrowed from or loaned to the Utility Money Pool were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Maximum Interest Rate
0.59
%
 
0.43
%
 
0.56
%
Minimum Interest Rate
0.24
%
 
0.24
%
 
0.39
%

The average interest rates for funds borrowed from and loaned to the Utility Money Pool for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 are summarized for all Registrant Subsidiaries in the following table:
 
 
Average Interest Rate
 for Funds Borrowed
from the Utility Money Pool for
Years Ended December 31,
 
Average Interest Rate
 for Funds Loaned
to the Utility Money Pool for
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
APCo
 
0.29
%
 
0.33
%
 
0.47
%
 
0.29
%
 
0.33
%
 
0.47
%
I&M
 
0.31
%
 
0.36
%
 
%
 
0.30
%
 
0.32
%
 
0.46
%
OPCo
 
0.27
%
 
0.33
%
 
0.47
%
 
0.34
%
 
0.32
%
 
0.47
%
PSO
 
0.29
%
 
0.34
%
 
%
 
%
 
0.33
%
 
0.46
%
SWEPCo
 
0.29
%
 
0.34
%
 
0.53
%
 
0.32
%
 
0.36
%
 
0.45
%

AGR’s maximum, minimum and average interest rates for funds either borrowed from or loaned to the Nonutility Money Pool or Parent for the year ended December 31, 2013 are summarized in the following table:
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 
Maximum
Interest Rate
for Funds
Borrowed
 
Minimum
Interest Rate
for Funds
Borrowed
 
Maximum
Interest Rate
for Funds
Loaned
 
Minimum
Interest Rate
for Funds
Loaned
 
Average
Interest Rate
for Funds
Borrowed
 
Average
Interest Rate
for Funds
Loaned
Nonutility Money Pool
 
0.66
%
 
0.53
%
 
0.35
%
 
0.32
%
 
0.58
%
 
0.34
%
Parent
 
0.34
%
 
0.24
%
 
%
 
%
 
0.28
%
 
%

Interest expense related to short-term borrowing activities with the Utility Money Pool, the Nonutility Money Pool and Parent is included in Interest Expense on each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ statements of income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries incurred interest expense for all short-term borrowing activities as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
6

 
$
414

 
$
772

I&M
 
135

 
70

 

OPCo
 
43

 
503

 
555

PSO
 
275

 
25

 
11

SWEPCo
 
168

 
5

 
977


Interest income related to short-term lending activities with the Utility Money Pool, the Nonutility Money Pool and Parent is included in Interest Income on each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ statements of income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries earned interest income for all short-term lending activities as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
317

 
$
109

 
$
123

I&M
 
127

 
924

 
963

OPCo
 
202

 
233

 
1,038

PSO
 

 
58

 
435

SWEPCo
 
14

 
113

 
320


380


Credit Facilities

For a discussion of credit facilities, see “Letters of Credit” section of Note 6 .

Sale of Receivables – AEP Credit

Under a sale of receivables arrangement, the Registrant Subsidiaries sell, without recourse, certain of their customer accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenue balances to AEP Credit and are charged a fee based on AEP Credit’s financing costs, administrative costs and uncollectible accounts experience for each Registrant Subsidiary’s receivables.  APCo does not have regulatory authority to sell its West Virginia accounts receivable.  The costs of customer accounts receivable sold are reported in Other Operation expense on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ statements of income.  The Registrant Subsidiaries manage and service their customer accounts receivable sold.

AEP Credit's receivables securitization agreement provides a commitment of $750 million from bank conduits to purchase receivables.  The agreement was increased in June 2014 from $700 million and expires in June 2016.

The amount of accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenues under the sale of receivables agreement for each Registrant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:
 
 
December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
159,823

 
$
156,599

I&M
 
137,459

 
139,257

OPCo
 
365,834

 
324,287

PSO
 
112,905

 
115,260

SWEPCo
 
148,668

 
149,337


The fees paid by the Registrant Subsidiaries to AEP Credit for customer accounts receivable sold were:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
8,896

 
$
6,471

 
$
6,883

I&M
 
7,900

 
6,510

 
6,121

OPCo
 
28,809

 
21,573

 
20,312

PSO
 
5,926

 
5,604

 
7,054

SWEPCo
 
6,750

 
5,917

 
6,140


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ proceeds on the sale of receivables to AEP Credit were:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
1,519,266

 
$
1,442,983

 
$
1,353,920

I&M
 
1,488,561

 
1,458,803

 
1,344,260

OPCo
 
2,647,643

 
2,620,483

 
2,952,723

PSO
 
1,321,068

 
1,232,363

 
1,157,174

SWEPCo
 
1,655,753

 
1,533,840

 
1,481,925


381


15 .   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For other related party transactions, also see “AEP System Tax Allocation Agreement” section of Note 12 in addition to “Utility Money Pool – AEP System” and “Sale of Receivables – AEP Credit” sections of Note 14 .

Interconnection Agreement

In accordance with management’s December 2010 announcement and October 2012 filing with the FERC, the Interconnection Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2014.  The AEP System Interim Allowance Agreement which provided for, among other things, the transfer of SO 2 emission allowances associated with transactions under the Interconnection Agreement was also terminated.

APCo, I&M, KPCo, OPCo and AEPSC were parties to the Interconnection Agreement which defined the sharing of costs and benefits associated with the respective generation plants.  This sharing was based upon each AEP utility subsidiary’s MLR and was calculated monthly on the basis of each AEP utility subsidiary’s maximum peak demand in relation to the sum of the maximum peak demands of all four AEP utility subsidiaries during the preceding 12 months.

Effective January 1, 2014, the FERC approved the following agreements. See "Corporate Separation" section of Note 1 .

A Power Coordination Agreement among APCo, I&M and KPCo with AEPSC as the agent to coordinate the participants’ respective power supply resources.
A Bridge Agreement among AGR, APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCo with AEPSC as the agent to address open commitments related to the termination of the Interconnection Agreement and responsibilities to PJM.
A Power Supply Agreement between AGR and OPCo for AGR to supply capacity and the energy needs of OPCo's retail load.

AEPSC conducts power, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other risk management activities on behalf of APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo. Effective January 1, 2014, power and natural gas risk management activities for APCo, I&M and KPCo are allocated based on the three member companies’ respective equity positions, while power and natural gas risk management activities for PSO and SWEPCo are allocated based on the Operating Agreement. Prior to January 1, 2014, power and natural gas risk management activities were allocated under the SIA to former members of the Interconnection Agreement, PSO and SWEPCo. Risk management activities primarily include power and natural gas physical transactions, financially-settled swaps and exchange-traded futures.  AEPSC settles the majority of the physical forward contracts by entering into offsetting contracts. Effective January 1, 2014 and with the transfer of OPCo’s generation assets to AGR, AEPSC conducts only gasoline, diesel fuel, energy procurement and FTR price risk management activities on OPCo’s behalf.
Operating Agreement

PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC are parties to the Operating Agreement which was approved by the FERC.  The Operating Agreement requires PSO and SWEPCo to maintain adequate annual planning reserve margins and requires that capacity in excess of the required margins be made available for sale to other operating companies as capacity commitments. In January 2014, the FERC approved a modification of the Operating Agreement to address changes resulting from an anticipated March 2014 SPP power market change. Subsequently and in March 2014, SPP changed from an energy imbalance service market to a fully integrated power market. In alignment with the new SPP integrated power market and according to the modified Operating Agreement, PSO and SWEPCo operate as standalone entities and offer their respective generation into the SPP power market. SPP then economically dispatches resources. By offering their resources separately, PSO and SWEPCo no longer purchase or sell energy to each other to serve their respective internal load or off-system sales.


382


System Integration Agreement (SIA)

Under the SIA, AEPSC allocates physical and financial revenues and expenses from transactions with neighboring utilities, power marketers and other power and natural gas risk management activities based upon the location of such activity. Margins resulting from trading and marketing activities originating in PJM and MISO generally accrue to the benefit of APCo, I&M and KPCo, while trading and marketing activities originating in SPP generally accrue to the benefit of PSO and SWEPCo.  Margins resulting from other transactions are allocated among APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and SWEPCo based upon the equity positions of these companies.

The SIA was designed to function as an umbrella agreement in addition to the Interconnection Agreement (prior to January 1, 2014) and the Operating Agreement, each of which controlled the distribution of revenues and expenses.

Affiliated Revenues and Purchases

The following tables show the revenues derived from sales under the Interconnection Agreement, direct sales to affiliates, net transmission agreement sales and other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
Related Party Revenues
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales under Interconnection Agreement (a)
 
$
184

 
$
503

 
$
1,121

 
$

 
$

Direct Sales to East Affiliates
 
141,721

 

 

 
3,765

 
10,048

Direct Sales to West Affiliates
 
614

 
363

 

 

 
328

Direct Sales to AEPEP
 

 

 
44,121

 

 

Transmission Agreement and Transmission Coordination Agreement Sales
 
(1,665
)
 
1,675

 
104,052

 
8

 
14,119

Other Revenues
 
3,583

 
1,657

 
15,922

 
3,281

 
1,783

Total Affiliated Revenues
 
$
144,437

 
$
4,198

 
$
165,216

 
$
7,054

 
$
26,278

Related Party Revenues
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales under Interconnection Agreement
 
$
193,651

 
$
218,164

 
$
924,313

 
$

 
$

Direct Sales to East Affiliates
 
129,014

 

 
152,689

 
14

 
1

Direct Sales to West Affiliates
 
578

 
391

 
804

 
10,761

 
35,410

Direct Sales to AEPEP
 

 

 

 

 
(136
)
Transmission Agreement and Transmission Coordination Agreement Sales
 
461

 
(681
)
 
53,405

 

 
14,715

Other Revenues
 
23,780

 
1,525

 
35,643

 
3,471

 
1,822

Total Affiliated Revenues
 
$
347,484

 
$
219,399

 
$
1,166,854

 
$
14,246

 
$
51,812

Related Party Revenues
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales under Interconnection Agreement
 
$
166,733

 
$
265,923

 
$
643,486

 
$

 
$

Direct Sales to East Affiliates
 
124,519

 

 
136,142

 
34

 
142

Direct Sales to West Affiliates
 
314

 
218

 
454

 
18,861

 
23,695

Direct Sales to AEPEP
 

 

 

 

 
(583
)
Transmission Agreement and Transmission Coordination Agreement Sales
 
(1,289
)
 
758

 
26,295

 
8

 
12,338

Other Revenues
 
27,922

 
1,509

 
40,917

 
3,700

 
1,849

Total Affiliated Revenues
 
$
318,199

 
$
268,408

 
$
847,294

 
$
22,603

 
$
37,441


(a)    Includes December 2013 true-up activity subsequent to agreement termination.

383


The following tables show the purchased power expenses incurred for purchases under the Interconnection Agreement and from affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
Related Party Purchases
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases under Interconnection Agreement (a)
 
$
4,661

 
$
1,635

 
$
140

 
$

 
$

Direct Purchases from East Affiliates
 

 

 

 
976

 
1

Direct Purchases from West Affiliates
 

 

 

 
10,048

 
3,765

Direct Purchases from AGR
 

 

 
1,148,216

 

 

Direct Purchases from AEPEP
 

 

 
44,344

 

 

Direct Purchases from AEGCo
 

 
268,337

 

 

 

Total Affiliated Purchases
 
$
4,661

 
$
269,972

 
$
1,192,700

 
$
11,024

 
$
3,766

Related Party Purchases
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases under Interconnection Agreement
 
$
830,954

 
$
181,688

 
$
199,283

 
$

 
$

Direct Purchases from East Affiliates
 

 

 

 
1,481

 
411

Direct Purchases from West Affiliates
 
5

 
3

 
6

 
35,410

 
10,761

Direct Purchases from AEGCo
 

 
251,518

 
148,459

 

 

Natural Gas Purchases from AEPES
 

 

 
1,984

 

 

Total Affiliated Purchases
 
$
830,959

 
$
433,209

 
$
349,732

 
$
36,891

 
$
11,172

Related Party Purchases
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases under Interconnection Agreement
 
$
661,185

 
$
147,502

 
$
174,240

 
$

 
$

Direct Purchases from East Affiliates
 

 

 

 
683

 
368

Direct Purchases from West Affiliates
 
53

 
36

 
75

 
23,695

 
18,861

Direct Purchases from AEGCo
 

 
238,866

 
203,583

 

 

Natural Gas Purchases from AEPES
 

 

 
2,808

 

 

Total Affiliated Purchases
 
$
661,238

 
$
386,404

 
$
380,706

 
$
24,378

 
$
19,229


(a)    Includes December 2013 true-up activity subsequent to agreement termination.

The above summarized related party revenues and expenses are reported in Sales to AEP Affiliates and Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ statements of income.  Since the Registrant Subsidiaries are included in AEP’s consolidated results, the above summarized related party transactions are eliminated in total in AEP’s consolidated revenues and expenses.

System Transmission Integration Agreement (STIA)

AEP’s STIA provided for the integration and coordination of the planning, operation and maintenance of transmission facilities. Since the FERC approved the cancellation of the STIA effective June 1, 2014, the coordinated planning, operation and maintenance of transmission facilities are the responsibility of the RTOs and the STIA is no longer necessary. Similar to the SIA, the STIA functioned as an umbrella agreement in addition to the Transmission Agreement (TA) and the Transmission Coordination Agreement (TCA). The TA and TCA are both still active. The STIA contained two service schedules that governed:

The allocation of transmission costs and revenues.
The allocation of third-party transmission costs and revenues and AEP System dispatch costs.

384


APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, OPCo and WPCo are parties to the TA, effective November 2010, which defines how transmission costs through PJM OATT are allocated among the AEP East Companies, KGPCo and WPCo on a 12-month average coincident peak basis.

The following table shows the net charges recorded by the Registrant Subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 related to the TA:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
84,667

 
$
40,609

 
$
20,264

I&M
 
39,707

 
19,947

 
5,689

OPCo
 
16,989

 
8,946

 
6,090


The charges shown above are recorded in Other Operation expenses on the statements of income.

PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC are parties to the TCA, dated January 1, 1997, by and among PSO, SWEPCo and AEPSC, in connection with the operation of the transmission assets of the two AEP utility subsidiaries.  The TCA has been approved by the FERC and establishes a coordinating committee, which is charged with overseeing the coordinated planning of the transmission facilities of the parties to the agreement.  This includes the performance of transmission planning studies, the interaction of such companies with independent system operators (ISO) and other regional bodies interested in transmission planning and compliance with the terms of the OATT filed with the FERC and the rules of the FERC relating to such a tariff.

Under the TCA, the parties to the agreement delegated to AEPSC the responsibility of monitoring the reliability of their transmission systems and administering the OATT on their behalf.  The allocations have been governed by the FERC-approved OATT for the SPP.

The following table shows the net (revenues) expenses allocated among parties to the TCA pursuant to the SPP OATT protocols as described above for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
PSO
 
$
14,100

 
$
14,700

 
$
12,300

SWEPCo
 
(14,100
)
 
(14,700
)
 
(12,300
)

The net (revenues) expenses shown above are recorded in Sales to AEP Affiliates on SWEPCo’s statements of income and Other Operation expenses on PSO’s statements of income.

Unit Power Agreements (UPA)

Lawrenceburg UPA

In March 2007, OPCo and AEGCo entered into a 10-year UPA for the entire output from the Lawrenceburg Generating Station effective with AEGCo’s purchase of the plant in May 2007.  Effective January 1, 2014, the Lawrenceburg UPA was assigned by OPCo to AGR. The UPA has an option for an additional two-year period.  I&M operates the plant under an agreement with AEGCo.  Under the UPA, AGR pays AEGCo for the capacity, depreciation, fuel, operation and maintenance and tax expenses.  These payments are due regardless of whether the plant is operating.  The fuel and operation and maintenance payments are based on actual costs incurred.  All expenses are trued up periodically.


385


UPA between AEGCo and I&M

A UPA between AEGCo and I&M (the I&M Power Agreement) provides for the sale by AEGCo to I&M of all the power (and the energy associated therewith) available to AEGCo at the Rockport Plant unless it is sold to another utility.  Subsequently, I&M assigns 30% of the power to KPCo.  See the "UPA between AEGCo and KPCo" section below.  I&M is obligated, whether or not power is available from AEGCo, to pay as a demand charge for the right to receive such power (and as an energy charge for any associated energy taken by I&M) net of amounts received by AEGCo from any other sources, sufficient to enable AEGCo to pay all its operating and other expenses, including a rate of return on the common equity of AEGCo as approved by the FERC.  The I&M Power Agreement will continue in effect until the expiration of the lease term of Unit 2 of the Rockport Plant unless extended in specified circumstances.

UPA between AEGCo and KPCo

Pursuant to an assignment between I&M and KPCo and a UPA between KPCo and AEGCo, AEGCo sells KPCo 30% of the power (and the energy associated therewith) available to AEGCo from both units of the Rockport Plant.  KPCo pays to AEGCo in consideration for the right to receive such power the same amounts which I&M would have paid AEGCo under the terms of the I&M Power Agreement for such entitlement.  The KPCo UPA ends in December 2022.

Cook Coal Terminal

On August 1, 2013, OPCo transferred ownership of Cook Coal Terminal to AEGCo.  Cook Coal Terminal performs coal transloading and storage services at cost for APCo, I&M and OPCo.  OPCo included revenues for these services in Other Revenues – Affiliated and expenses in Other Operation expenses on the statements of income.  The coal transloading expenses in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

AEGCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
1

 
$

I&M
 
16,186

 
6,820

OPCo
 

 
322


OPCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
Company
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
APCo
 
$
(11
)
(a)
$
942

 
I&M
 
15,596

(b)
32,639

(b)

(a)
Includes annual true-up of 2012 estimated revenues.
(b)
Includes $7.3 million and $14.5 million in 2013 and 2012 , respectively, of amounts purchased by I&M on behalf of AEGCo for Rockport Plant through July 31, 2013.

APCo, I&M and OPCo recorded the cost of transloading services in Fuel on the balance sheet.


386


Cook Coal Terminal also performs railcar maintenance services at cost for APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo.  Beginning on August 1, 2013, Cook Coal Terminal also performs railcar maintenance services at cost for OPCo.  OPCo included revenues for these services in Sales to AEP Affiliates and expenses in Other Operation expenses on the statements of income.  The railcar maintenance revenues in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

AEGCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in thousands)
I&M
 
$
2,497

 
$
1,073

OPCo
 

 
41

PSO
 
310

 
106

SWEPCo
 
3,275

 
1,237


OPCo
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
Company
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
APCo
 
$
3

 
$
88

 
I&M
 
1,285

(a)
3,343

(a)
PSO
 
59

 
281

 
SWEPCo
 
1,204

 
2,102

 

(a)
Includes $608 thousand and $1.5 million in 2013 and 2012 , respectively, of amounts purchased by I&M on behalf of AEGCo for Rockport Plant through July 31, 2013.

APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo recorded the cost of the railcar maintenance services in Fuel on the balance sheets.

SWEPCo Railcar Facility

SWEPCo operates a railcar maintenance facility in Alliance, Nebraska.  The facility performs maintenance on its own railcars as well as railcars belonging to I&M, PSO and third parties.  SWEPCo billed I&M $508 thousand and $873 thousand for railcar services provided in 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and billed PSO $496 thousand and $279 thousand in 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  These billings for SWEPCo, and costs for I&M and PSO, are recorded in Fuel on the balance sheets.


387


I&M Barging, Urea Transloading and Other Services

I&M provides barging, urea transloading and other transportation services to affiliates.  Urea is a chemical used to control NO x emissions at certain generation plants in the AEP System.  I&M recorded revenues from barging, transloading and other services in Other Revenues – Affiliated on the statements of income.  The affiliated companies recorded these costs paid to I&M as fuel expenses or other operation expenses.  The amounts of affiliated expenses were:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
AEGCo
 
$
22,746

 
$
19,719

 
$
19,961

AGR
 
5,195

 

 

APCo
 
36,064

 
30,876

 
34,725

KPCo
 
5,031

 
50

 
74

OPCo
 

 
40,562

 
39,956

AEP River Operations LLC – (Nonutility Subsidiary of AEP)
 
25,253

 
22,648

 
20,917


Services Provided by AEP River Operations LLC

AEP River Operations LLC provides services for barge towing, chartering and general and administrative expenses to I&M.  The costs are recorded by I&M as Other Operation expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , I&M recorded expenses of $24 million , $24 million and $24 million , respectively, for these activities.

Central Machine Shop

APCo operates a facility which repairs and rebuilds specialized components for the generation plants across the AEP System.  APCo defers the cost of performing these services on the balance sheet, then transfers the cost to the affiliate for reimbursement.  The AEP subsidiaries recorded these billings as capital or maintenance expenses depending on the nature of the services received.  These billings are recoverable from customers.  The following table provides the amounts billed by APCo to the following affiliates:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
AEGCo
 
$
70

 
$
26

 
$
80

AGR
 
2,842

 

 

I&M
 
1,704

 
2,451

 
1,280

KPCo
 
1,180

 
687

 
277

OPCo
 

 
4,679

 
3,838

PSO
 
321

 
606

 
1,198

SWEPCo
 
72

 
168

 
145



388


Affiliate Railcar Agreement

Certain AEP subsidiaries have an agreement providing for the use of each other’s leased or owned railcars when available.  The agreement specifies that the company using the railcar will be billed, at cost, by the company furnishing the railcar.  The AEP subsidiaries recorded these costs or reimbursements as costs or reduction of costs, respectively, in Fuel on the balance sheets and such costs are recoverable from customers.  The following tables show the net effect of the railcar agreement on the balance sheets:
December 31, 2014
Billing Company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Billed Company
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
(in thousands)
AGR
 
$
(27
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

I&M
 
331

 

 
133

 
1,078

PSO
 
56

 
1,275

 

 
652

SWEPCo
 
96

 
2,159

 
183

 

December 31, 2013
Billing Company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Billed Company
 
AGR
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
(in thousands)
AGR
 
$

 
$
698

 
$
33

 
$
2

 
$
19

APCo
 
775

 

 

 

 

I&M
 
(391
)
 
507

 

 
195

 
854

PSO
 
(90
)
 
20

 
595

 

 
329

SWEPCo
 
(245
)
 
140

 
1,395

 
43

 


OVEC

AEP, OPCo and several nonaffiliated utility companies jointly own OVEC.  As of December 31, 2014 , AEP’s and OPCo’s ownership and investment in OVEC were as follows:
 
 
December 31, 2014
Company
 
Ownership
 
Investment
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
AEP
 
39.17
%
 
$
3,978

OPCo
 
4.30
%
 
430

Total
 
43.47
%
 
$
4,408


OVEC’s owners, along with APCo and I&M, are members to an intercompany power agreement.  Participants of this agreement are entitled to receive and obligated to pay for all OVEC generating capacity, approximately 2,200 MWs, in proportion to their respective power participation ratios.  The aggregate power participation ratio of certain AEP utility subsidiaries, including APCo, I&M and OPCo, is 43.47% .  The proceeds from the sale of power by OVEC are designed to be sufficient for OVEC to meet its operating expenses and fixed costs and provide a return on capital.  The intercompany power agreement ends in June 2040.

AEP, OPCo and other nonaffiliated owners authorized environmental investments related to their ownership interests. OVEC financed capital expenditures totaling $1.3 billion in connection with the engineering and construction of FGD projects and the associated waste disposal landfills at its two generation plants.  These environmental projects were funded through debt issuances.  As of December 31, 2014 , both generation plants were operating with environmental controls.


389


Purchased Power from OVEC

The amounts of power purchased by the Registrant Subsidiaries from OVEC for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
96,905

 
$
104,396

 
$
98,417

I&M
 
48,487

 
52,230

 
49,239

OPCo
 
123,101

 
132,607

 
125,013


The amounts shown above are recoverable from customers and are included in Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income.

Sales and Purchases of Property

Certain AEP subsidiaries had affiliated sales and purchases of electric property individually amounting to $100 thousand or more, sales and purchases of meters and transformers, and sales and purchases of transmission property.  There were no gains or losses recorded on the transactions.  The following tables show the sales and purchases, recorded at net book value, for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 :

Sales
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
3,031

 
$
3,212

 
$
6,643

I&M
 
1,256

 
5,031

 
3,296

OPCo
 
532

 
59,818

 
4,163

PSO
 
510

 
5,651

 
1,782

SWEPCo
 
1,216

 
1,617

 
1,731


Purchases
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
860

 
$
5,199

 
$
2,522

I&M
 
1,352

 
964

 
285

OPCo
 
1,902

 
5,311

 
10,608

PSO
 
2,079

 
1,710

 
1,867

SWEPCo
 
4,023

 
8,440

 
7,266


The amounts above are recorded in Property, Plant and Equipment on the balance sheets.

Intercompany Billings

The Registrant Subsidiaries and other AEP subsidiaries perform certain utility services for each other when necessary or practical.  The costs of these services are billed on a direct-charge basis, whenever possible, or on reasonable basis of proration for services that benefit multiple companies.  The billings for services are made at cost and include no compensation for the use of equity capital.

390


16 .   VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities” is a consolidation model that considers if a company has a controlling financial interest in a VIE.  A controlling financial interest will have both (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.  Entities are required to consolidate a VIE when it is determined that they have a controlling financial interest in a VIE and therefore, are the primary beneficiary of that VIE, as defined by the accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities.”  In determining whether they are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, management considers for each Registrant Subsidiary factors such as equity at risk, the amount of the VIE’s variability the Registrant Subsidiary absorbs, guarantees of indebtedness, voting rights including kick-out rights, the power to direct the VIE, variable interests held by related parties and other factors.  Management believes that significant assumptions and judgments were applied consistently.  In addition, the Registrant Subsidiaries have not provided financial or other support to any VIE that was not previously contractually required.

SWEPCo is the primary beneficiary of Sabine.  I&M is the primary beneficiary of DCC Fuel.  OPCo is the primary beneficiary of Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding.  APCo is the primary beneficiary of Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding.  SWEPCo holds a significant variable interest in DHLC.  Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries hold a significant variable interest in AEPSC.  In 2013, I&M and OPCo each held a significant variable interest in AEGCo.

Sabine is a mining operator providing mining services to SWEPCo.  SWEPCo has no equity investment in Sabine but is Sabine’s only customer.  SWEPCo guarantees the debt obligations and lease obligations of Sabine.  Under the terms of the note agreements, substantially all assets are pledged and all rights under the lignite mining agreement are assigned to SWEPCo.  The creditors of Sabine have no recourse to any AEP entity other than SWEPCo.  Under the provisions of the mining agreement, SWEPCo is required to pay, as a part of the cost of lignite delivered, an amount equal to mining costs plus a management fee.  In addition, SWEPCo determines how much coal will be mined each year.  Based on these facts, management concluded that SWEPCo is the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate Sabine.  SWEPCo’s total billings from Sabine for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $151 million , $155 million and $147 million , respectively.  See the table below for the classification of Sabine’s assets and liabilities on SWEPCo’s balance sheets.

The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of Sabine that are consolidated.  These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
Sabine
 
 
2014
 
2013
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Current Assets
 
$
67,981

 
$
66,478

Net Property, Plant and Equipment
 
145,491

 
157,274

Other Noncurrent Assets
 
51,578

 
51,211

Total Assets
 
$
265,050

 
$
274,963

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
$
36,286

 
$
32,812

Noncurrent Liabilities
 
228,349

 
241,673

Equity
 
415

 
478

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
265,050

 
$
274,963



391


I&M has nuclear fuel lease agreements with DCC Fuel IV LLC, DCC Fuel V LLC, DCC Fuel VI LLC and DCC Fuel VII (collectively DCC Fuel).  DCC Fuel was formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and leasing nuclear fuel to I&M.  DCC Fuel purchased the nuclear fuel from I&M with funds received from the issuance of notes to financial institutions.  Each entity is a single-lessee leasing arrangement with only one asset and is capitalized with all debt.  Each is a separate legal entity from I&M, the assets of which are not available to satisfy the debts of I&M.  Payments on the leases for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $109 million , $153 million and $127 million , respectively.  The leases were recorded as capital leases on I&M’s balance sheet as title to the nuclear fuel transfers to I&M at the end of the respective lease terms, which do not exceed 54 months.  Based on I&M’s control of DCC Fuel, management concluded that I&M is the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate DCC Fuel.  The capital leases are eliminated upon consolidation.  The lease agreements ended for DCC Fuel LLC and DCC Fuel III LLC in October 2013 and for DCC Fuel II LLC in October 2014.  See the table below for the classification of DCC Fuel’s assets and liabilities on I&M’s balance sheets.

The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of DCC Fuel that are consolidated.  These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
DCC Fuel
ASSETS
 
2014
 
2013
Current Assets
 
$
97,361

 
$
117,762

Net Property, Plant and Equipment
 
158,121

 
156,820

Other Noncurrent Assets
 
79,705

 
60,450

Total Assets
 
$
335,187

 
$
335,032

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
$
86,026

 
$
107,815

Noncurrent Liabilities
 
249,161

 
227,217

Equity
 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
335,187

 
$
335,032


Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding was formed for the sole purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to phase-in recovery property.  Management has concluded that OPCo is the primary beneficiary of Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding because OPCo has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and OPCo's equity interest could potentially be significant.  Therefore, OPCo is required to consolidate Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding.  The securitized bonds totaled $232 million and $267 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and are included in current and long-term debt on the balance sheet.  Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding has securitized assets of $110 million and $132 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, which is presented separately on the face of the balance sheet.  The phase-in recovery property represents the right to impose and collect Ohio deferred distribution charges from customers receiving electric transmission and distribution service from OPCo under a recovery mechanism approved by the PUCO.  In August 2013, securitization bonds were issued.  The securitization bonds are payable only from and secured by the securitized assets.  The bondholders have no recourse to OPCo or any other AEP entity.  OPCo acts as the servicer for Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding's securitized assets and remits all related amounts collected from customers to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding for interest and principal payments on the securitization bonds and related costs.


392


The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding that are consolidated.  These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.
OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding
ASSETS
 
2014
 
2013
Current Assets
 
$
32,676

 
$
23,198

Other Noncurrent Assets (a)
 
209,922

 
251,409

Total Assets
 
$
242,598

 
$
274,607

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
$
47,099

 
$
36,470

Noncurrent Liabilities
 
194,162

 
236,800

Equity
 
1,337

 
1,337

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
242,598

 
$
274,607


(a)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 of $97 million and $116 million , respectively. 
 
Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding was formed for the sole purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to APCo's under-recovered ENEC deferral balance.  Management has concluded that APCo is the primary beneficiary of Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding because APCo has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and APCo's equity interest could potentially be significant.  Therefore, APCo is required to consolidate Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding.  The securitized bonds totaled $368 million and $380 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and are included in current and long-term debt on the balance sheet.   Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding has securitized assets of $350 million and $369 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, which is presented separately on the face of the balance sheet.  The phase-in recovery property represents the right to impose and collect WV deferred generation charges from customers receiving electric transmission, distribution and generation service from APCo under a recovery mechanism approved by the WVPSC.  In November 2013, securitization bonds were issued.  The securitization bonds are payable only from and secured by the securitized assets.  The bondholders have no recourse to APCo or any other AEP entity.  APCo acts as the servicer for Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding's securitized assets and remits all related amounts collected from customers to Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding for interest and principal payments on the securitization bonds and related costs.


393


The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding that are consolidated.  These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Appalachian Consumer Rate
Relief Funding
ASSETS
 
2014
 
2013
Current Assets
 
$
18,099

 
$
5,891

Other Noncurrent Assets (a)
 
358,264

 
378,029

Total Assets
 
$
376,363

 
$
383,920

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
$
26,809

 
$
14,000

Noncurrent Liabilities
 
347,652

 
368,018

Equity
 
1,902

 
1,902

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
376,363

 
$
383,920


(a)
Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 of $4 million and $4 million , respectively.
 
DHLC is a mining operator which sells 50% of the lignite produced to SWEPCo and 50% to CLECO.  SWEPCo and CLECO share the executive board seats and voting rights equally.  Each entity guarantees 50% of DHLC’s debt.  SWEPCo and CLECO equally approve DHLC’s annual budget.  The creditors of DHLC have no recourse to any AEP entity other than SWEPCo.  As SWEPCo is the sole equity owner of DHLC, it receives 100% of the management fee.  SWEPCo’s total billings from DHLC for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $56 million , $60 million and $77 million , respectively.  SWEPCo is not required to consolidate DHLC as it is not the primary beneficiary, although SWEPCo holds a significant variable interest in DHLC.  SWEPCo’s equity investment in DHLC is included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on SWEPCo’s balance sheets.

SWEPCo’s investment in DHLC was:
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
(in thousands)
Capital Contribution from SWEPCo
$
7,643

 
$
7,643

 
$
7,643

 
$
7,643

Retained Earnings
3,819

 
3,819

 
1,600

 
1,600

SWEPCo's Guarantee of Debt

 
104,334

(a)

 
61,348

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Investment in DHLC
$
11,462

 
$
115,796

 
$
9,243

 
$
70,591


(a)
Includes affiliate advances due to Parent related to participation in the Utility Money Pool of $56 million in 2014.


394


AEPSC provides certain managerial and professional services to AEP’s subsidiaries.  AEP is the sole equity owner of AEPSC.  AEP management controls the activities of AEPSC.  The costs of the services are based on a direct charge or on a prorated basis and billed to the AEP subsidiary companies at AEPSC’s cost.  AEP subsidiaries have not provided financial or other support outside of the reimbursement of costs for services rendered.  AEPSC finances its operations through cost reimbursement from other AEP subsidiaries.  There are no other terms or arrangements between AEPSC and any of the AEP subsidiaries that could require additional financial support from an AEP subsidiary or expose them to losses outside of the normal course of business.  AEPSC and its billings are subject to regulation by the FERC.  AEP subsidiaries are exposed to losses to the extent they cannot recover the costs of AEPSC through their normal business operations.  AEP subsidiaries are considered to have a significant interest in AEPSC due to their activity in AEPSC’s cost reimbursement structure.  However, AEP subsidiaries do not have control over AEPSC.  AEPSC is consolidated by AEP.  In the event AEPSC would require financing or other support outside the cost reimbursement billings, this financing would be provided by AEP.

Total AEPSC billings to the Registrant Subsidiaries were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
216,470

 
$
174,393

 
$
195,176

I&M
 
133,194

 
119,343

 
127,232

OPCo
 
168,956

 
255,485

 
277,232

PSO
 
101,421

 
85,974

 
89,199

SWEPCo
 
140,286

 
125,441

 
136,642


The carrying amount and classification of variable interest in AEPSC's accounts payable are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Company
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
30,692

 
$
30,692

 
$
20,191

 
$
20,191

I&M
 
22,480

 
22,480

 
12,864

 
12,864

OPCo
 
24,695

 
24,695

 
31,425

 
31,425

PSO
 
15,338

 
15,338

 
10,596

 
10,596

SWEPCo
 
20,772

 
20,772

 
13,520

 
13,520


AEGCo, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP, is consolidated by AEP.  AEGCo owns a 50% ownership interest in Rockport Plant, Unit 1, leases a 50% interest in Rockport Plant, Unit 2 and owns 100% of the Lawrenceburg Generating Station.  AEGCo sells all the output from the Rockport Plant to I&M and KPCo.   AEGCo has a UPA associated with the Lawrenceburg Generating Station which was assigned by OPCo to AGR effective January 1, 2014.  AEP has agreed to provide AEGCo with the funds necessary to satisfy all of the debt obligations of AEGCo.  I&M is considered to have a significant interest in AEGCo due to these transactions.  I&M is exposed to losses to the extent it cannot recover the costs of AEGCo through its normal business operations.  In the event AEGCo would require financing or other support outside the billings to I&M and KPCo, this financing would be provided by AEP.  For additional information regarding AEGCo’s lease, see “Rockport Lease” section of Note 13 .


395


Total billings from AEGCo were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
I&M
 
$
268,337

 
$
251,518

 
$
238,865

OPCo
 

 
148,459

 
203,582


The carrying amount and classification of variable interest in AEGCo's accounts payable are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Company
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
As Reported on
the Balance Sheet
 
Maximum
Exposure
 
 
(in thousands)
I&M
 
$
20,031

 
$
20,031

 
$
23,916

 
$
23,916

OPCo
 

 

 
12,810

 
12,810


396


17 .   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

The Registrant Subsidiaries provide for depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment, excluding coal-mining properties, on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of property, generally using composite rates by functional class.  The following tables provide annual property information for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
6,824,029


$
2,433,231


3.1%

40
-
121

$


$


NA

NA
Transmission
 
2,228,029


507,542


1.7%

15
-
87





NA

NA
Distribution
 
3,258,306


722,665


3.5%

13
-
57





NA

NA
CWIP
 
321,495


(19,405
)

NM

NM





NA

NA
Other
 
339,175


167,171


6.9%

24
-
55

34,345


12,460


NM

NM
Total
 
$
12,971,034

 
$
3,811,204

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
34,345

 
$
12,460

 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
6,745,172

 
$
2,306,545

 
3.0%
 
40
-
121
 
$

 
$

 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
2,160,660

 
490,143

 
1.6%
 
25
-
87
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
3,139,150

 
674,351

 
3.5%
 
11
-
52
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
184,701

 
(19,297
)
 
NM
 
NM
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
323,758

 
153,797

 
7.3%
 
24
-
55
 
33,759

 
12,451

 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
12,553,441

 
$
3,605,539

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
33,759

 
$
12,451

 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
3.0%
 
40
-
121
 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
1.6%
 
25
-
87
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
3.4%
 
13
-
57
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
NM
 
NM
 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
6.8%
 
24
-
55
 
NM
 
NM

NA
Not applicable.
NM
Not meaningful.

397


I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
3,741,831


$
1,855,162


2.0%

59
-
132

$


$


NA

NA
Transmission
 
1,358,419


432,927


1.7%

50
-
75





NA

NA
Distribution
 
1,698,409


413,040


2.8%

15
-
70





NA

NA
CWIP
 
537,237


(27,858
)

NM

NM





NA

NA
Other
 
1,342,813


628,991


6.1%

14
-
45

148,007


108,079


NM

NM
Total
 
$
8,678,709

 
$
3,302,262

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
148,007

 
$
108,079

 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
3,577,906

 
$
1,887,333

 
1.9%
 
59
-
132
 
$

 
$

 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
1,304,225

 
420,295

 
1.5%
 
50
-
75
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
1,625,057

 
390,014

 
2.8%
 
15
-
70
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
427,164

 
(18,824
)
 
NM
 
NM
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
1,268,597

 
509,426

 
4.9%
 
14
-
45
 
152,764

 
111,105

 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
8,202,949

 
$
3,188,244

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
152,764

 
$
111,105

 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
1.7%
 
59
-
132
 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
1.5%
 
46
-
75
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
2.5%
 
14
-
70
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
NM
 
NM
 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
9.6%
 
14
-
40
 
NM
 
NM

NA
Not applicable.
NM
Not meaningful. 

398


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Transmission
 
$
2,104,613

 
$
844,353

 
2.3%

39
-
60
 
$

 
$

 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
4,087,601

 
1,050,888

 
2.7%

7
-
57
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
218,667

 
(39,218
)
 
NM

NM
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
380,453

 
181,258

 
7.0%

7
-
50
 
10,395


839

 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
6,791,334

 
$
2,037,281

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
10,395

 
$
839

 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Transmission
 
$
2,011,289

 
$
814,849

 
2.3%
 
39
-
60
 
$

 
$

 
NA

NA
Distribution
 
3,877,532

 
1,023,313

 
2.7%
 
12
-
60
 

 

 
NA

NA
CWIP
 
185,428

 
(29,825
)
 
NM
 
NM
 

 

 
NA

NA
Other
 
354,195

 
163,894

 
7.5%
 
25
-
50
 
10,378

 
811

 
NM

NM
Total
 
$
6,428,444

 
$
1,972,231

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
10,378

 
$
811

 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
NA
 
NA
 
3.0%
 
35
-
66
Transmission
 
2.3%
 
39
-
60
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
2.7%
 
12
-
60
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
NM
 
NM
 
NM
 
NM
Other
 
7.3%
 
25
-
50
 
NM
 
NM

NA
Not applicable.
NM
Not meaningful.

399


PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
1,264,724


$
585,653


1.7%

35
-
70

$


$


NA

NA
Transmission
 
788,911


161,056


1.9%

40
-
75





NA

NA
Distribution
 
2,080,221


366,325


2.4%

30
-
65





NA

NA
CWIP
 
204,753


(11,055
)

NM

NM





NA

NA
Other
 
416,398


217,583


4.1%

5
-
40

5,170


(8
)

NM

NM
Total
 
$
4,755,007

 
$
1,319,562

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,170

 
$
(8
)
 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
$
1,203,221

 
$
583,486

 
1.7%
 
35
-
70
 
$

 
$

 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
731,312

 
186,040

 
1.9%
 
40
-
75
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
1,986,032

 
365,299

 
2.3%
 
30
-
65
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
175,890

 
(15,138
)
 
NM
 
NM
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
387,856

 
203,841

 
4.1%
 
5
-
40
 
5,170

 
(6
)
 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
4,484,311

 
$
1,323,528

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,170

 
$
(6
)
 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation
 
1.7%
 
35
-
70
 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
1.9%
 
40
-
75
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
2.4%
 
30
-
65
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP
 
NM
 
NM
 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
6.6%
 
5
-
40
 
NM
 
NM

NA
Not applicable.
NM
Not meaningful.

400


SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation (a)
 
$
3,864,543


$
1,101,244


2.2%

40
-
70

$


$


NA

NA
Transmission
 
1,300,729


328,783


2.2%

50
-
70





NA

NA
Distribution
 
1,894,572


576,808


2.7%

25
-
65





NA

NA
CWIP (a)
 
471,689


(8,454
)

NM

NM

291




NA

NA
Other
 
587,027


361,892


4.8%

7
-
51

291,726


143,017


NM

NM
Total
 
$
8,118,560

 
$
2,360,273

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
292,017

 
$
143,017

 
 
 
 
2013
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional
Class of
Property
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Property,
Plant and
Equipment
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Annual
Composite
Depreciation
Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation (a)
 
$
3,764,429

 
$
1,062,166

 
2.2%
 
40
-
70
 
$

 
$

 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
1,165,167

 
312,567

 
2.3%
 
50
-
70
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
1,843,912

 
563,087

 
2.6%
 
25
-
65
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
CWIP (a)
 
281,849

 
(7,355
)
 
NM
 
NM
 

 

 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
574,131

 
326,871

 
5.0%
 
7
-
51
 
295,099

 
134,316

 
NM
 
NM
Total
 
$
7,629,488

 
$
2,257,336

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
295,099

 
$
134,316

 
 
 
 
2012
 
Regulated
 
Nonregulated
Functional Class of Property
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
Annual Composite
Depreciation Rate
 
Depreciable
Life Ranges
 
 
 
 
(in years)
 
 
 
(in years)
Generation (a)
 
2.2%
 
35
-
65
 
NA
 
NA
Transmission
 
2.3%
 
50
-
70
 
NA
 
NA
Distribution
 
2.6%
 
25
-
65
 
NA
 
NA
CWIP (a)
 
NM
 
NM
 
NA
 
NA
Other
 
6.6%
 
7
-
47
 
NM
 
NM

(a)
SWEPCo's regulated section includes amounts related to SWEPCo's Arkansas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant.
NA
Not applicable.
NM
Not meaningful.

SWEPCo provides for depreciation, depletion and amortization of coal-mining assets over each asset's estimated useful life or the estimated life of each mine, whichever is shorter, using the straight-line method for mining structures and equipment.  SWEPCo uses either the straight-line method or the units-of-production method to amortize mine development costs and deplete coal rights based on estimated recoverable tonnages.  SWEPCo includes these costs in fuel expense.

For regulated operations, the composite depreciation rate generally includes a component for nonasset retirement obligation (non-ARO) removal costs, which is credited to Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization.  Actual removal costs incurred are charged to Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization.  Any excess of accrued non-ARO removal costs over actual removal costs incurred is reclassified from Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and reflected as a regulatory liability.  For nonregulated operations, non-ARO removal costs are expensed as incurred. 

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

The Registrant Subsidiaries record ARO in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” for the retirement of certain ash disposal facilities, closure and monitoring of underground carbon storage facilities at Mountaineer Plant and coal mining facilities as well as asbestos removal.  I&M records ARO for the decommissioning of the Cook Plant.  The Registrant Subsidiaries have identified, but not recognized, ARO liabilities related to electric transmission and distribution assets as a result of certain easements on property on which assets are owned.  Generally, such easements are perpetual and require only the retirement and removal of assets upon the cessation of the property’s use.  The retirement obligation is not estimable for such easements since the Registrant Subsidiaries plan to use their facilities indefinitely.  The retirement obligation would only be recognized if and when the Registrant Subsidiaries abandon or cease the use of specific easements, which is not expected.

401


As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , I&M’s ARO liability for nuclear decommissioning of the Cook Plant was $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion , respectively.  These liabilities are reflected in Asset Retirement Obligations on I&M’s balance sheets.  As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 , the fair value of I&M’s assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling decommissioning liabilities totaled $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion , respectively.  These assets are included in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on I&M’s balance sheets.

The following is a reconciliation of the 2014 and 2013 aggregate carrying amounts of ARO by Registrant Subsidiary:
Company
 
ARO as of
December 31,
2013
 
Accretion
Expense
 
Liabilities
Incurred
 
Liabilities
Settled
 
Revisions in
Cash Flow
Estimates
 
Contribution/
(Distribution)
of OPCo
Generation
Assets
 
ARO as of
December 31,
2014
(in thousands)
APCo (a)(d)
 
$
152,607

 
$
9,081

 
$

 
$
(23,992
)
 
$
10,681

 
$

 
$
148,377

I&M (a)(b)(d)
 
1,255,184

 
60,005

 

 
(1,380
)
 
28,740

 

 
1,342,549

OPCo (a)(d)
 
1,297

 
80

 

 
(26
)
 
10

 

 
1,361

PSO (a)(d)
 
22,928

 
1,786

 

 
(749
)
 
14,055

 

 
38,020

SWEPCo (a)(c)(d)
 
87,630

 
5,156

 

 
(1,102
)
 
2,710

 

 
94,394

Company
 
ARO as of
December 31,
2012
 
Accretion
Expense
 
Liabilities
Incurred
 
Liabilities
Settled
 
Revisions in
Cash Flow
Estimates
 
Contribution/
(Distribution)
of OPCo
Generation
Assets
 
ARO as of
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
APCo (a)(d)
 
$
115,168

 
$
7,343

 
$

 
$
(7,298
)
 
$
7,083

 
$
30,311

 
$
152,607

I&M (a)(b)(d)
 
1,192,313

 
72,658

 

 
(635
)
 
(9,152
)
 

 
1,255,184

OPCo (a)(d)
 
269,940

 
14,957

 
158

 
(9,788
)
 
53,208

 
(327,178
)
 
1,297

PSO (a)(d)
 
21,999

 
1,703

 

 
(755
)
 
(19
)
 

 
22,928

SWEPCo (a)(c)(d)
 
78,017

 
4,912

 
4,191

 
(2,699
)
 
3,209

 

 
87,630


(a)
Includes ARO related to ash disposal facilities.
(b)
Includes ARO related to nuclear decommissioning costs for the Cook Plant of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 .
(c)
Includes ARO related to Sabine and DHLC.
(d)
Includes ARO related to asbestos removal.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) and Interest Capitalization

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ amounts of allowance for equity funds used during construction are summarized in the following table:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
7,053

 
$
2,353

 
$
1,684

I&M
 
18,873

 
19,943

 
9,724

OPCo
 
6,913

 
4,961

 
3,492

PSO
 
3,071

 
4,187

 
2,007

SWEPCo
 
11,947

 
7,338

 
57,054



402


The Registrant Subsidiaries’ amounts of allowance for borrowed funds used during construction, including capitalized interest, are summarized in the following table:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
3,810

 
$
1,522

 
$
1,347

I&M
 
8,015

 
9,752

 
4,717

OPCo
 
4,436

 
10,102

 
9,046

PSO
 
1,792

 
2,272

 
1,098

SWEPCo
 
6,949

 
4,262

 
48,499


Jointly-owned Electric Facilities

The Registrant Subsidiaries have electric facilities that are jointly-owned with affiliated and nonaffiliated companies.  Using its own financing, each participating company is obligated to pay its share of the costs of any such jointly-owned facilities in the same proportion as its ownership interest.  Each Registrant Subsidiary’s proportionate share of the operating costs associated with such facilities is included in its statements of income and the investments and accumulated depreciation are reflected in its balance sheets under Property, Plant and Equipment as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company’s Share as of December 31, 2014
Company
 
Fuel
Type
 
Percent of
Ownership
 
Utility Plant
in Service
 
Construction
Work in
Progress
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rockport Generating Plant (a)(e)
 
Coal
 
50.0
%
 
$
801,536


$
119,921


$
492,184

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oklaunion Generating Station, Unit 1 (b)
 
Coal
 
15.6
%
 
$
94,678


$
2,558


$
57,490

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dolet Hills Generating Station, Unit 1 (c)
 
Lignite
 
40.2
%
 
$
329,706


$
3,739


$
201,321

Flint Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
 
Coal
 
50.0
%
 
125,114


119,629


67,948

Pirkey Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
 
Lignite
 
85.9
%
 
531,064


36,490


381,058

Turk Generating Plant (d)
 
Coal
 
73.33
%
 
1,647,005


889


69,820

Total
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,632,889

 
$
160,747

 
$
720,147

 
 
 
 
 
 
Company’s Share as of December 31, 2013
Company
 
Fuel
Type
 
Percent of
Ownership
 
Utility Plant
 in Service
 
Construction
Work in
Progress
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
I&M
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rockport Generating Plant (a)(e)
 
Coal
 
50
%
 
$
797,485

 
$
54,577

 
$
471,787

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PSO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oklaunion Generating Station, Unit 1 (b)
 
Coal
 
15.6
%
 
$
93,555

 
$
1,844

 
$
57,576

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dolet Hills Generating Station, Unit 1 (c)
 
Lignite
 
40.2
%
 
$
261,685

 
$
47,131

 
$
197,720

Flint Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
 
Coal
 
50
%
 
122,566

 
54,281

 
65,546

Pirkey Generating Station, Unit 1 (d)
 
Lignite
 
85.9
%
 
519,158

 
28,833

 
375,718

Turk Generating Plant (d)
 
Coal
 
73.33
%
 
1,638,044

 
13,081

 
35,455

Total
 
 
 
 
 
2,541,453

 
143,326

 
674,439


(a)
Operated by I&M.
(b)
Operated by PSO and also jointly-owned ( 54.7% ) by TNC.
(c)
Operated by CLECO, a nonaffiliated company.
(d)
Operated by SWEPCo.
(e)
Amounts include I&M's 50% ownership of both Unit 1 and capital additions for Unit 2. Unit 2 is subject to an operating lease with a nonaffiliated company. See the "Rockport Lease" section of Note 13.

403


18 .   COST REDUCTION PROGRAMS

2014 Disposition Plant Severance

Management intends to retire several generation plants or units of plants during 2015. The plant closures will result in involuntary severances. The severance program provides two weeks of base pay for every year of service along with other severance benefits.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recorded charges to Other Operation expense in December 2014 primarily related to employees at the disposition plants.
 
 
Expense
Allocation from
 
Incurred by
Registrant
 
 
 
 
 
Remaining
Balance as of
Company
 
AEPSC
 
Subsidiaries
 
Settled
 
Adjustments
 
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
292

 
$
6,820

 
$
2,192

(a)
$

 
$
9,304

I&M
 
162

 
8,023

 
(162
)
 

 
8,023

OPCo
 
80

 

 
(80
)
 

 

PSO
 
154

 
134

 
(154
)
 

 
134

SWEPCo
 
205

 
84

 
(205
)
 

 
84


(a) Settled includes amounts received from affiliates for expenses related to joint plant.

These expenses, net of adjustments, relate primarily to severance benefits and are included primarily in Other Operation expense on the statements of income.  The remaining liability is included in Other Current Liabilities on the balance sheets.  Management does not expect additional severance costs to be incurred related to this initiative.

2012 Sustainable Cost Reductions

In April 2012, management initiated a process to identify strategic repositioning opportunities and efficiencies that will result in sustainable cost savings.  Management selected a consulting firm to facilitate an organizational and process evaluation and a second firm to evaluate current employee benefit programs.  The process resulted in involuntary severances and was completed by the end of the first quarter of 2013.  The severance program provides two weeks of base pay for every year of service along with other severance benefits.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recorded charges to Other Operation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 primarily related to severance benefits as a result of the sustainable cost reductions initiative. The amounts incurred by Registrant Subsidiary were as follows:
 
 
Cost Incurred
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
275

 
$
8,472

I&M
 
355

 
5,678

OPCo
 
5,831

 
13,498

PSO
 
(147
)
 
3,675

SWEPCo
 
1,017

 
5,709




404


19 .   UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

In management’s opinion, the unaudited quarterly information reflects all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for interim periods.  Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of a full year’s operations because of various factors.  The unaudited quarterly financial information for each Registrant Subsidiary is as follows:
Quarterly Periods Ended:
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo (a)
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
March 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
913,391

 
$
641,854

 
$
880,192

 
$
301,385

 
$
440,590

 
Operating Income
 
220,010

 
146,024

 
115,719

 
25,326

 
64,726

 
Net Income
 
101,851

 
87,089

 
60,774

 
8,448

 
22,962

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
694,668

 
$
533,876

 
$
786,161

 
$
318,815

 
$
449,283

 
Operating Income
 
110,677

 
57,133

 
114,021

 
48,878

 
78,787

 
Net Income
 
36,247

 
27,334

 
56,535

 
22,449

 
32,823

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
709,884

 
$
542,863

 
$
839,197

 
$
416,991

 
$
531,771

 
Operating Income
 
130,236

 
62,851

 
104,679

 
87,414

 
133,131

 
Net Income
 
48,758

 
26,626

 
54,060

 
45,086

 
74,547

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
735,135

 
$
531,141

 
$
871,370

 
$
314,385

 
$
424,753

 
Operating Income
 
107,263

 
39,234

 
99,086

 
27,214

 
45,998

 
Net Income
 
28,559

 
14,598

 
45,053

 
10,946

 
14,227

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarterly Periods Ended:
 
APCo
 
I&M
 
OPCo
 
PSO
 
SWEPCo
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
951,494

 
$
583,393

 
$
1,233,790

 
$
262,289

 
$
394,317

 
Operating Income
 
164,560

 
81,230

 
244,813

 
33,552

 
50,639

 
Net Income
 
70,548

 
43,457

 
129,774

 
13,693

 
11,548

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
746,504

 
$
549,501

 
$
1,102,994

 
$
324,687

 
$
420,173

 
Operating Income
 
92,072

 
77,533

 
73,072

(b)
58,471

 
77,032

 
Net Income
 
29,862

 
40,754

 
21,056

(b)
28,432

 
30,227

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
849,733

 
$
638,865

 
$
1,279,176

 
$
411,083

 
$
552,933

 
Operating Income
 
147,692

 
102,364

 
312,795

 
95,832

 
52,359

(c)
Net Income
 
62,625

 
57,880

 
178,901

 
51,096

 
7,920

(c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Revenues
 
$
869,675

 
$
595,100

 
$
1,146,655

 
$
297,463

 
$
428,380

 
Operating Income
 
101,954

(d)
60,734

 
162,418

 
23,380

 
163,813

(e)
Net Income
 
30,176

(d)
35,413

 
80,249

 
4,575

 
104,124

(e)

(a)
Prior to January 1, 2014, OPCo engaged in the generation of electric power and the subsequent sale of that power
to customers.
(b)
Includes an impairment for Muskingum River Plant, Unit 5 (see Note 7 ).
(c)
Includes a regulatory disallowance for the Turk Plant (see Note 4 ).
(d)
Includes a regulatory disallowance for Amos Plant, Unit 3 (see Note 7 ).
(e)
Includes the reversal of regulatory disallowance for the Turk Plant (see Note 4 ).


405


COMBINED MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF REGISTRANT SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a combined presentation of certain components of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ management’s discussion and analysis.  The information in this section completes the information necessary for management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and net income and is meant to be read with (a) Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations, (b) financial statements, (c) footnotes and (d) the schedules of each individual registrant.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Customer Demand

In comparison to 2013, AEP's weather-normalized retail sales increased 1% for the year ended December 31, 2014. AEP's 2014 industrial sales increased 0.4% compared to 2013, despite the closure of Ormet, a large aluminum company in October 2013. Excluding Ormet, AEP's industrial sales volumes increased by 3.9%. AEP's 2014 residential and commercial sales increased 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively, compared to 2013.
In 2015, AEP anticipates weather-normalized retail sales will increase by 0.6%. The industrial class is expected to grow by 2% in 2015, primarily related to a number of new oil and natural gas expansions, especially around the major shale gas areas within AEP’s footprint. Weather-normalized residential sales are projected to increase by 0.2%, primarily related to projected customer growth. Commercial class energy sales are projected to decrease by 0.4%.

LITIGATION

Potential Uninsured Losses

Some potential losses or liabilities may not be insurable or the amount of insurance carried may not be sufficient to meet potential losses and liabilities, including, but not limited to, liabilities relating to a cyber security incident or damage to the Cook Plant and costs of replacement power in the event of a nuclear incident at the Cook Plant.  Future losses or liabilities, which are not completely insured, unless recovered from customers, could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

The Registrant Subsidiaries are implementing a substantial capital investment program and incurring additional operational costs to comply with environmental control requirements.  The Registrant Subsidiaries will need to make additional investments and operational changes in response to existing and anticipated requirements such as CAA requirements to reduce emissions of SO 2 , NO x , PM and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from fossil fuel-fired power plants, proposals governing the beneficial use and disposal of coal combustion products, proposed clean water rules and renewal permits for certain water discharges that are currently under appeal.

The Registrant Subsidiaries are engaged in litigation about environmental issues, have been notified of potential responsibility for the clean-up of contaminated sites and incur costs for disposal of SNF and future decommissioning of I&M’s nuclear units.  AEP, along with various industry groups, affected states and other parties have challenged some of the Federal EPA requirements in court.  Management is also engaged in the development of possible future requirements including the items discussed below and reductions of CO 2 emissions to address concerns about global climate change.  Management believes that further analysis and better coordination of these future environmental requirements would facilitate planning and lower overall compliance costs while achieving the same environmental goals.


406


Management will seek recovery of expenditures for pollution control technologies and associated costs from customers through rates in regulated jurisdictions.  Environmental rules could result in accelerated depreciation, impairment of assets or regulatory disallowances.  If the Registrant Subsidiaries are unable to recover the costs of environmental compliance, it would reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Environmental Controls Impact on the Generating Fleet

The rules and proposed environmental controls discussed in the next several sections will have a material impact on the generating units in the AEP System.  Management continues to evaluate the impact of these rules, project scope and technology available to achieve compliance.  As of December 31, 2014 , the AEP System had a total generating capacity of nearly 37,600 MWs, of which over 23,700 MWs are coal-fired.  Management continues to refine the cost estimates of complying with these rules and other impacts of the environmental proposals on the coal-fired generating facilities.  For the Registrant Subsidiaries, management’s current ranges of estimates of environmental investments to comply with these proposed requirements are listed below:
 Through 2020
Estimated Environmental Investment
Company
 
Low
 
High
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
APCo
 
$
310

 
$
360

I&M
 
370

 
430

PSO
 
270

 
310

SWEPCo
 
900

 
1,000


For APCo, the projected environmental investments above include the conversions of 470 MWs of coal generation to natural gas.  If natural gas conversion is not completed, the units could be retired sooner than planned.

The cost estimates will change depending on the timing of implementation and whether the Federal EPA provides flexibility in the final rules.  The cost estimates for each Registrant Subsidiary will also change based on: (a) the states’ implementation of these regulatory programs, including the potential for state implementation plans (SIPs) or federal implementation plans (FIPs) that impose standards more stringent than the proposed rules, (b) additional rulemaking activities in response to court decisions, (c) the actual performance of the pollution control technologies installed on the units, (d) changes in costs for new pollution controls, (e) new generating technology developments, (f) total MWs of capacity retired and replaced, including the type and amount of such replacement capacity and (g) other factors.

Subject to the factors listed above and based upon management’s continuing evaluation, management intends to retire the following plants or units of plants before or during 2016:
Company
 
Plant Name and Unit
 
Generating
Capacity
 
 
 
 
(in MWs)
APCo
 
Clinch River Plant, Unit 3
 
235

APCo
 
Glen Lyn Plant
 
335

APCo
 
Kanawha River Plant
 
400

APCo/AGR
 
Sporn Plant
 
600

I&M
 
Tanners Creek Plant
 
995

PSO
 
Northeastern Station, Unit 4
 
470

SWEPCo
 
Welsh Plant, Unit 2
 
528


As of December 31, 2014 , the net book value, before cost of removal, including related material and supplies inventory and CWIP balances, of the plants in the table above was $727 million. See Note 5 for further discussion.


407


Volatility in fuel prices, pending environmental rules and other market factors could also have an adverse impact on the accounting evaluation of the recoverability of the net book values of coal-fired units.  For regulated plants that may be closed early, management is seeking regulatory recovery of remaining net book values.  To the extent the book value of existing generation assets and the cost of new equipment and converted facilities are not recoverable, it could materially reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Clean Air Act Requirements

The CAA establishes a comprehensive program to protect and improve the nation’s air quality and control sources of air emissions.  The states implement and administer many of these programs and could impose additional or more stringent requirements.

The Federal EPA issued the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) in 2005 requiring specific reductions in SO 2 and NO x emissions from power plants.  The Federal EPA issued the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) in August 2011 to replace CAIR.  The CSAPR was challenged in the courts.  In 2012, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision vacating and remanding CSAPR to the Federal EPA with instructions to continue implementing CAIR until a replacement rule is finalized.  That decision has been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reversed the decision and remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 
All of the states in which the Registrant Subsidiaries’ power plants are located are covered by CSAPR. See "Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)" section below.

The Federal EPA issued final maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for coal and oil-fired power plants in 2012. See “Mercury and Other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Regulation” section below.

The Federal EPA issued a Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR), detailing how the CAA’s requirement that certain facilities install best available retrofit technology (BART) to address regional haze in federal parks and other protected areas.  BART requirements apply to facilities built between 1962 and 1977 that emit more than 250 tons per year of certain pollutants in specific industrial categories, including power plants.  CAVR will be implemented through SIPs or, if SIPs are not adequate or are not developed on schedule, through FIPs.  The Federal EPA proposed disapproval of SIPs in a few states, including Arkansas.  Arkansas is developing a revised submittal.  In June 2012, the Federal EPA published revisions to the regional haze rules to allow states participating in the CSAPR trading programs to use those programs in place of source-specific BART for SO 2 and NO x emissions based on its determination that CSAPR results in greater visibility improvements than source-specific BART in the CSAPR states.  This rule is being challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

In 2009, the Federal EPA issued a final mandatory reporting rule for CO 2 and other greenhouse gases covering a broad range of facilities emitting in excess of 25,000 tons of CO 2 emissions per year.   The Federal EPA issued a final endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles in 2009.  The Federal EPA determined that greenhouse gas   emissions from stationary sources will be subject to regulation under the CAA beginning January 2011 and finalized its proposed scheme to streamline and phase-in regulation of stationary source CO 2 emissions through the NSR prevention of significant deterioration and Title V operating permit programs through the issuance of final federal rules, SIP calls and FIPs.  The Federal EPA has proposed to include CO 2 emissions in standards that apply to new and existing electric utility units. See "Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy" section below.

The Federal EPA has also issued new, more stringent national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM, SO 2 , and proposed a more stringent NAAQS for ozone.  States are in the process of evaluating the attainment status and need for additional control measures in order to attain and maintain the new NAAQS and may develop additional requirements for facilities as a result of those evaluations.  Management cannot currently predict the nature, stringency or timing of those requirements.

Notable developments in significant CAA regulatory requirements affecting the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations are discussed in the following sections.

408


Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)

In 2011, the Federal EPA issued CSAPR.  Certain revisions to the rule were finalized in 2012.  CSAPR relies on newly-created SO 2 and NO x allowances and individual state budgets to compel further emission reductions from electric utility generating units in 28 states.  Interstate trading of allowances is allowed on a restricted sub-regional basis.  Arkansas and Louisiana are subject only to the seasonal NO x program in the rule.  Texas is subject to the annual programs for SO 2 and NO x in addition to the seasonal NO x program.  The annual SO 2 allowance budgets in Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia were reduced significantly in the rule.  A supplemental rule includes Oklahoma in the seasonal NO x program.  The supplemental rule was finalized in December 2011 with an increased NO x emission budget for the 2012 compliance year.  The Federal EPA issued a final Error Corrections Rule and further CSAPR revisions in 2012 to make corrections to state budgets and unit allocations and to remove the restrictions on interstate trading in the first phase of CSAPR.

Numerous affected entities, states and other parties filed petitions to review the CSAPR in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  In 2012, the court issued a decision vacating and remanding CSAPR to the Federal EPA with instructions to continue implementing the CAIR until a replacement rule is finalized.  The majority determined that the CAA does not allow the Federal EPA to “overcontrol” emissions in an upwind state and that the Federal EPA exceeded its statutory authority by failing to allow states an opportunity to develop their own implementation plans before issuing a FIP.  The petition for review filed by the Federal EPA and other parties in the U.S. Supreme Court was granted in June 2013. In April 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision reversing in part the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. The Federal EPA filed a motion to lift the stay and allow Phase I of CSAPR to take effect on January 1, 2015 and Phase II to take effect on January 1, 2017. The court granted the Federal EPA's motion, established a briefing schedule and scheduled oral argument for March 2015 on the remaining issues. Separate appeals of the Error Corrections Rule and the further revisions have been filed but no briefing schedules have been established. Management cannot predict the outcome of the pending litigation.

Mercury and Other Hazardous Air Pollutants Regulation

In 2012, the Federal EPA issued a rule addressing a broad range of HAPs from coal and oil-fired power plants.  The rule establishes unit-specific emission rates for mercury, PM (as a surrogate for particles of nonmercury metal) and hydrogen chloride (as a surrogate for acid gases) for units burning coal on a site-wide 30-day rolling average basis.  In addition, the rule proposes work practice standards, such as boiler tune-ups, for controlling emissions of organic HAPs and dioxin/furans.  The effective date of the final rule was April 16, 2012 and compliance is required within three years.  Petitions for administrative reconsideration and judicial review were filed.  In 2012, the Federal EPA published a notice announcing that it would accept comments on its reconsideration of certain issues related to the new source standards, including clarification of the requirements that apply during periods of start-up and shut down, measurement issues and the application of variability factors that may have an impact on the level of the standards.  The Federal EPA issued revisions to the new source standards consistent with the proposed rule, except the start-up and shut down provisions in March 2013.  The Federal EPA is still considering additional changes to the start-up and shut down provisions. In April 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied all of the petitions for review of the April 2012 final rule. Industry trade groups and several states filed petitions for further review in the U.S. Supreme Court and the court granted those petitions in November 2014.

The final rule contains a slightly less stringent PM limit for existing sources than the original proposal and allows operators to exclude periods of start-up and shut down from the emissions averaging periods.  The AEP System has obtained a one-year administrative extension at several units to facilitate the installation of controls or to avoid a serious reliability problem.  In addition, the Federal EPA issued an enforcement policy describing the circumstances under which an administrative consent order might be issued to provide a fifth year for the installation of controls or completion of reliability upgrades.  Management remains concerned about the availability of compliance extensions, the inability to foreclose citizen suits being filed under the CAA for failure to achieve compliance by the required deadlines and the lack of coordination among the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards schedule and other environmental requirements.  

409


Climate Change, CO 2 Regulation and Energy Policy

National public policy makers and regulators in the 10 states the Registrant Subsidiaries serve have diverse views on climate change, carbon regulation and energy policy.  Management is currently focused on responding to these emerging views with prudent actions across a range of plausible scenarios and outcomes.  Management is an active participant in both state and federal policy development to assure that any proposed new requirements are feasible and the economies of the states served are not placed at a competitive disadvantage.

Several states have adopted programs that directly regulate CO 2 emissions from power plants.  The majority of the states where the Registrant Subsidiaries have generating facilities have passed legislation establishing renewable energy, alternative energy and/or energy efficiency requirements that can assist in reducing carbon emissions.  The Registrant Subsidiaries are taking steps to comply with these requirements, including increasing wind power purchases and broadening the AEP System's portfolio of energy efficiency programs.

Management estimates that 2014 emissions were approximately 120 million metric tons.  This represents a reduction of 18% compared to 2005 CO 2  emissions of approximately 146 million metric tons.

In the absence of comprehensive federal climate change or energy policy legislation, President Obama issued a memorandum to the Administrator of the Federal EPA directing the agency to develop and issue a new proposal regulating carbon emissions from new electric generating units under the CAA.  The new proposal was issued in September 2013 and requires new large natural gas units to meet a limit of 1,000 pounds of CO 2 per MWh of electricity generated and small natural gas units to meet a limit of 1,100 pounds of CO 2 per MWh.  New coal-fired units are required to meet a limit of 1,100 pounds of CO 2 per MWh, with the option to meet a 1,000 pound per MWh limits if they choose to average emissions over multiple years.  This proposal was published in the Federal Register in January 2014 and the comment period has closed.

The Federal EPA was also directed to develop and issue a separate proposal regulating carbon emissions from modified and reconstructed electric generating units (EGUs) and to issue guidelines for existing EGUs before June 2014, to finalize those standards by June 2015 and to require states to submit revisions to their implementation plans including such standards no later than June 2016. The Federal EPA issued guidelines for the development of standards for existing sources in June 2014. The guidelines use a “portfolio” approach to reducing emissions from existing sources that includes efficiency improvements at coal plants, displacing coal-fired generation with increased utilization of natural gas combined cycle units, expanding renewable generation resources and increasing customer energy efficiency. Comments were due in December 2014. The Federal EPA also issued proposed regulations governing emissions of CO 2 from modified and reconstructed EGUs in June 2014 and comments were due in October 2014. The standards for modified and reconstructed units include several options, including use of historic baselines or energy efficiency audits to establish source-specific CO 2 emission rates or to limit CO 2 emission rates which could be no less than 1,900 pounds per MWh at larger coal units and 2,100 pounds per MWh at smaller coal units. The Federal EPA announced in January 2015 that the schedule for finalizing its action on all of these standards will extend into the summer of 2015 and that it will develop and propose for public comment a model FIP that will be finalized for individual states that fail to submit a timely state plan to implement the existing source standards. Management cannot currently predict the impact these programs may have on future resource plans or the existing generating fleet, but the costs may be substantial.

In 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision upholding, in all material respects, the Federal EPA’s endangerment finding, its regulatory program for CO 2 emissions from new motor vehicles and its plan to phase in regulation of CO 2 emissions from stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V operating permit programs. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Federal EPA was not compelled to regulate CO 2 emissions from stationary sources under the Title V or PSD programs as a result of its adoption of the motor vehicle standards, but that sources otherwise required to obtain a PSD permit may be required to perform a Best Available Control Technology analysis for CO 2 emissions if they exceed a reasonable level. The Federal EPA must undertake additional rulemaking to implement the court’s decision and establish an appropriate level.

410


Federal and state legislation or regulations that mandate limits on the emission of CO 2 could result in significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs, which in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs.  Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might force the Registrant Subsidiaries to close some coal-fired facilities and could lead to possible impairment of assets.  Public perception may ultimately have a significant impact on future legislation and regulation.

To the extent climate change impacts a region's economic health, it could also affect revenues.  The Registrant Subsidiaries’ financial performance is tied to the health of the regional economies served.  The price of energy, as a factor in a region's cost of living as well as an important input into the cost of goods, has an impact on the economic health of communities served.  The cost of additional regulatory requirements would normally be borne by consumers through higher prices for energy and purchased goods.

Coal Combustion Residual Rule

In 2010, the Federal EPA published a proposed rule to regulate the disposal and beneficial re-use of coal combustion residuals (CCR), including fly ash and bottom ash generated at coal-fired electric generating units and also FGD gypsum generated at some coal-fired plants.  The proposed rule contained two alternative proposals.  One proposal would impose federal hazardous waste disposal and management standards on these materials and another would allow states to retain primary authority to regulate the beneficial re-use and disposal of these materials under state solid waste management standards, including minimum federal standards for disposal and management.  Both proposals would impose stringent requirements for the construction of new coal ash landfills and existing unlined surface impoundments.

Various environmental organizations and industry groups filed a petition seeking to establish deadlines for a final rule. To comply with a court-ordered deadline, the Federal EPA issued a prepublication copy of its final rule in December 2014. The rule is expected to be published in the Federal Register during the first quarter of 2015 and become effective six months following publication.

In the final rule, the Federal EPA elected to regulate CCR as a non-hazardous solid waste and issued new minimum federal solid waste management standards. On the effective date, the rule applies to new and existing active CCR landfills and CCR surface impoundments at operating electric utility or independent power production facilities. The rule imposes new and additional construction and operating obligations, including location restrictions, liner criteria, structural integrity requirements for impoundments, operating criteria and additional groundwater monitoring requirements. The rule does not apply to inactive CCR landfills and inactive surface impoundments at retired generating stations or the beneficial use of CCR. The rule is self-implementing so state action is not required. Because of this self-implementing feature, the rule contains extensive record keeping, notice and internet posting requirements. Because the Registrant Subsidiaries currently use surface impoundments and landfills to manage CCR materials at the generating facilities, they will incur significant costs to upgrade or close and replace these existing facilities at some point in the future as the new rule is implemented. Management continues to review the new rule and evaluate its costs and impacts on operations, including ongoing monitoring requirements.

In February 2014, the Federal EPA completed a risk evaluation of the beneficial uses of coal fly ash in concrete and FGD gypsum in wallboard and concluded that the Federal EPA supports these beneficial uses.  Currently, approximately 40% of the coal ash and other residual products from the AEP System’s generating facilities are re-used in the production of cement and wallboard, as structural fill or soil amendments, as abrasives or road treatment materials and for other beneficial uses.  Encapsulated beneficial uses are not materially impacted by the new rule but additional demonstrations may be required to continue land applications in significant amounts except in road construction projects.


411


Clean Water Act (CWA) Regulations

In 2014, the Federal EPA issued a final rule setting forth standards for existing power plants that is intended to reduce mortality of aquatic organisms pinned against a plant’s cooling water intake screen (impingement) or entrained in the cooling water.  Entrainment is when small fish, eggs or larvae are drawn into the cooling water system and affected by heat, chemicals or physical stress.  The final rule affects all plants withdrawing more than two million gallons of cooling water per day. The rule offers seven technology options to comply with the impingement standard and requires site-specific studies to determine appropriate entrainment compliance measures at facilities withdrawing more than 125 million gallons per day. Additional requirements may be imposed as a result of consultation with other federal agencies to protect threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Facilities with existing closed cycle recirculating cooling systems, as defined in the rule, are not expected to require any technology changes. Facilities subject to both the impingement standard and site-specific entrainment studies will typically be given at least three years to conduct and submit the results of those studies to the permit agency. Compliance timeframes will then be established by the permit agency through each facility’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for installation of any required technology changes, as those permits are renewed over the next five to eight years. Petitions for review of the final rule have been filed by industry and environmental groups and are currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

In addition, the Federal EPA issued an information collection request and is developing revised effluent limitation guidelines for electricity generating facilities.  A proposed rule was signed in April 2013 with a final rule expected in September 2015.  The Federal EPA proposed eight options of increasing stringency and cost for fly ash and bottom ash transport water, scrubber wastewater, leachate from coal combustion byproduct landfills and impoundments and other wastewaters associated with coal-fired generating units, with four labeled preferred options.  Certain of the Federal EPA's preferred options have already been implemented or are part of long-term plans.  Management continues to review the proposal in detail to evaluate whether the plants are currently meeting the proposed limitations, what technologies have been incorporated into long-range plans and what additional costs might be incurred if the Federal EPA's most stringent options were adopted.  Management submitted detailed comments to the Federal EPA in September 2013 and participated in comments filed by various organizations of which the AEP System is a member.

In April 2014, the Federal EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly issued a proposed rule to clarify the scope of the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court cases and published the proposed rule in the Federal Register. The CWA provides for federal jurisdiction over “navigable waters” defined as “the waters of the United States.” This proposed jurisdictional definition will apply to all CWA programs, potentially impacting generation, transmission and distribution permitting and compliance requirements. Among those programs are: permits for wastewater and storm water discharges, permits for impacts to wetlands and water bodies and oil spill prevention planning. Management agrees that clarity and efficiency in the permitting process is needed. Management is concerned that the proposed rule introduces new concepts and could subject more operations to CWA jurisdiction, thereby increasing the time and complexity of permitting. Management submitted detailed comments to the Federal EPA in November 2014 and also participated in comments filed by various organizations of which the AEP System is a member.


412


FINANCIAL CONDITION

BUDGETED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES

The 2015 estimated construction expenditures by Registrant Subsidiary include distribution, transmission and generation related investments, as well as expenditures for compliance with environmental regulations as follows:
 
 
2015 Budgeted Construction Expenditures
Company
 
Environmental
 
Generation
 
Transmission
 
Distribution
 
Other
 
Total
 
 
(in millions)
APCo
 
$
70

 
$
72

 
$
255

 
$
197

 
$
30

 
$
624

I&M
 
40

 
259

 
63

 
122

 
33

 
517

OPCo
 

 

 
94

 
268

 
36

 
398

PSO
 
85

 
88

 
24

 
185

 
17

 
399

SWEPCo
 
316

 
47

 
109

 
98

 
20

 
590


For 2015, 2016 and 2017, management forecasts annual construction expenditures for the AEP System of $4.5 billion, $3.8 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively.  The budgeted amounts for 2015 include debt AFUDC.  The expenditures are generally for distribution, transmission, generation and required environmental investment to comply with Federal EPA rules.  Estimated construction expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, weather, legal reviews and the ability to access capital.  These construction expenditures will be funded through cash flows from operations and financing activities.  Generally, the Registrant Subsidiaries use cash or short-term borrowings under the money pool to fund these expenditures until long-term funding is arranged.

SIGNIFICANT TAX LEGISLATION

The Small Business Jobs Act extended the time for claiming bonus depreciation and increased the deduction to 100% for 2011 and decreased the deduction to 50% for 2012.  The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 provided for the extension of several business and energy industry tax deductions and credits, including the one-year extension of 50% bonus depreciation to 2013.  The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 also included a one-year extension of the 50% bonus depreciation and provided for the extension of research and development, employment and several energy tax credits for 2014. These enacted provisions had no material impact on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ net income or financial condition but did have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2013 and 2014 and are expected to have a favorable impact on cash flows in 2015.

CYBER SECURITY

Cyber security presents a growing risk for electric utility systems because a cyber-attack could affect critical energy infrastructure.  Breaches to the cyber security of the grid or to the AEP System are potentially disruptive to people, property and commerce and create risk for business, investors and customers.  In February 2013, President Obama signed an executive order that addresses how government agencies will operate and support the functions in cyber security as well as redefines how the government interfaces with critical infrastructure, such as the electric grid.  The AEP System already operates under regulatory cyber security standards to protect critical infrastructure.  The cyber security framework that is being developed through this executive order will be reviewed by FERC and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).  In 2014, the DOE developed an Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework Implementation Guide for utilities to use in adopting and implementing the National Institute of Standards and Technology framework. AEP is actively engaged in the framework adoption process.


413


The electric utility industry is one of the few critical infrastructure functions with mandatory cyber security requirements under the authority of FERC. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave FERC the authority to oversee reliability of the bulk power system, including the authority to approve mandatory cyber security reliability standards. North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), which FERC certified as the nation's Electric Reliability Organization, developed critical infrastructure protection cyber security reliability standards. In 2013, as part of the industry’s continuing program to advance threat sharing and coordination, AEP participated in the NERC GridEx II exercise.  This effort, led by NERC, tested and developed the coordination and interaction between utilities and various government agencies relative to potential cyber and physical threats against the nation’s electric grid.

Critical cyber assets, such as data centers, power plants, transmission operations centers and business networks are protected using multiple layers of cyber security and authentication.  The AEP System is constantly scanned for risks or threats. Cyber hackers have been able to breach a number of very secure facilities, from federal agencies, banks and retailers to social media sites.  As these events become known and develop, AEP continually assesses its cyber security tools and processes to determine where to strengthen its defenses. Management continually reviews the business continuity plan to develop an effective recovery effort that decreases response times, limits financial impacts and maintains customer confidence following any business interruption. Management works closely with a broad range of departments, including Legal, Regulatory, Corporate Communications and Information Technology Security, to ensure the corporate response to consequences of any breach or potential breach is appropriate both for internal and external audiences based on the specific circumstances surrounding the event.

Management continues to take steps to enhance the AEP System’s capabilities for identifying risks or threats and has shared that knowledge threats with utility peers, industry and federal agencies.  The AEP System operates a Cyber Security Operations Center.  Funding for this included a grant from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – U.S. Department of Energy Smart Grid Demonstration Program.  This facility was initially designed as a pilot cyber threat and information-sharing center specifically for the electric sector and is fully operational.

AEP has partnered with a major defense contractor who has significant cyber security experience and technical capabilities developed through their work with the U.S. Department of Defense.  AEP works with a consortium of other utilities across the country, learning how best to share information about potential threats and collaborating with each other.  AEP continues to work with a nonaffiliated entity to conduct several seminars each year about recognizing and investigating cyber vulnerabilities.  Through these types of efforts, AEP is working to protect itself while helping its industry advance its cyber security capabilities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures, including amounts related to legal matters and contingencies.  Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:

It requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and
Changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a material effect on net income or financial condition.

Management discusses the development and selection of critical accounting estimates as presented below with the Audit Committee of AEP’s Board of Directors and the Audit Committee reviews the disclosures relating to them.

Management believes that the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in the financial statements are appropriate.  However, actual results can differ significantly from those estimates.

The sections that follow present information about the Registrant Subsidiaries’ critical accounting estimates, as well as the effects of hypothetical changes in the material assumptions used to develop each estimate.

414


Regulatory Accounting

Nature of Estimates Required

The financial statements of the Registrant Subsidiaries reflect the actions of regulators that can result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in different time periods than enterprises that are not rate-regulated.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognize regulatory assets (deferred expenses to be recovered in the future) and regulatory liabilities (deferred future revenue reductions or refunds) for the economic effects of regulation.  Specifically, the Registrant Subsidiaries match the timing of expense and income recognition with regulated revenues.  Liabilities are also recorded for refunds, or probable refunds, to customers that have not been made.

Assumptions and Approach Used

When incurred costs are probable of recovery through regulated rates, the Registrant Subsidiaries record them as regulatory assets on the balance sheet.  Management reviews the probability of recovery at each balance sheet date and whenever new events occur.  Similarly, the Registrant Subsidiaries record regulatory liabilities when a determination is made that a refund is probable or when ordered by a commission.   Examples of new events that affect probability include changes in the regulatory environment, issuance of a regulatory commission order or passage of new legislation.  The assumptions and judgments used by regulatory authorities continue to have an impact on the recovery of costs as well as the return of revenues, rate of return earned on invested capital and timing and amount of assets to be recovered through regulated rates.  If recovery of a regulatory asset is no longer probable, that regulatory asset is written-off as a charge against earnings.  A write-off of regulatory assets or establishment of a regulatory liability may also reduce future cash flows since there will be no recovery through regulated rates.

Effect if Different Assumptions Used

A change in the above assumptions may result in a material impact on net income.  Refer to Note 5 for further detail related to regulatory assets and liabilities.

Revenue Recognition – Unbilled Revenues

Nature of Estimates Required

The Registrant Subsidiaries record revenues when energy is delivered to the customer.  The determination of sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month.  At the end of each month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue accrual is recorded.  This estimate is reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on meter readings.  In accordance with the applicable state commission regulatory treatment in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas, PSO and SWEPCo do not record the fuel portion of unbilled revenue.

The changes in unbilled electricity utility revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Company
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
4,540

 
$
(11,600
)
 
$
8,047

I&M
 
(22,506
)
 
6,077

 
(1,233
)
OPCo
 
5,055

 
(17,375
)
 
(14,721
)
PSO
 
(3,149
)
 
(3,842
)
 
5,213

SWEPCo
 
(3,602
)
 
3,225

 
2,302


415



Assumptions and Approach Used

For each Registrant Subsidiary, the monthly estimate for unbilled revenues is computed as net generation (generation plus purchases less sales) less the current month’s billed KWh plus the prior month’s unbilled KWh.  However, due to meter reading issues, meter drift and other anomalies, a separate monthly calculation limits the unbilled estimate within a range of values.  This limiter calculation is derived from an allocation of billed KWh to the current month and previous month, on a cycle-by-cycle basis, and dividing the current month aggregated result by the billed KWh.  The limits are statistically set at one standard deviation from this percentage to determine the upper and lower limits of the range.  The unbilled estimate is compared to the limiter calculation and adjusted for variances exceeding the upper and lower limits.

Effect if Different Assumptions Used

Significant fluctuations in energy demand for the unbilled period, weather, line losses or changes in the composition of customer classes could impact the accuracy of the unbilled revenue estimate.  A 1% change in the limiter calculation when it is outside the range would increase or decrease unbilled revenues by 1% of the accrued unbilled revenues.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

Nature of Estimates Required

Management considers fair value techniques, valuation adjustments related to credit and liquidity and judgments related to the probability of forecasted transactions occurring within the specified time period to be critical accounting estimates.  These estimates are considered significant because they are highly susceptible to change from period to period and are dependent on many subjective factors.

Assumptions and Approach Used

The Registrant Subsidiaries measure the fair values of derivative instruments and hedge instruments accounted for using MTM accounting based primarily on exchange prices and broker quotes.  If a quoted market price is not available, the fair value is estimated based on the best market information available including valuation models that estimate future energy prices based on existing market and broker quotes, supply and demand market data and other assumptions.  Fair value estimates, based upon the best market information available, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  These uncertainties include projections of macroeconomic trends and future commodity prices, including supply and demand levels and future price volatility.

The Registrant Subsidiaries reduce fair values by estimated valuation adjustments for items such as discounting, liquidity and credit quality.  Liquidity adjustments are calculated by utilizing bid/ask spreads to estimate the potential fair value impact of liquidating open positions over a reasonable period of time.  Credit adjustments on risk management contracts are calculated using estimated default probabilities and recovery rates relative to the  counterparties or counterparties with similar credit profiles and contractual netting agreements.  

With respect to hedge accounting, management assesses hedge effectiveness and evaluates a forecasted transaction’s probability of occurrence within the specified time period as provided in the original hedge documentation.


416


Effect if Different Assumptions Used

There is inherent risk in valuation modeling given the complexity and volatility of energy markets.  Therefore, it is possible that results in future periods may be materially different as contracts settle.

The probability that hedged forecasted transactions will not occur by the end of the specified time period could change operating results by requiring amounts currently classified in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to be classified into operating income.

For additional information regarding derivatives, hedging and fair value measurements, see Notes 10 and 11 .  See “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” section of Note 1 for fair value calculation policy.

Long-Lived Assets

Nature of Estimates Required

In accordance with the requirements of “Property, Plant and Equipment” accounting guidance, the Registrant Subsidiaries evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such assets may not be recoverable including planned abandonments and a probable disallowance for rate-making on a plant under construction or the assets meet the held-for-sale criteria.  The Registrant Subsidiaries utilize a group composite method of depreciation to estimate the useful lives of long-lived assets.  The evaluations of long-lived, held-and-used assets may result from abandonments, significant decreases in the market price of an asset, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is being used or in its physical condition, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, as well as other economic or operations analyses.  If the carrying amount is not recoverable, the Registrant Subsidiary records an impairment to the extent that the fair value of the asset is less than its book value.  Performing an impairment evaluation involves a significant degree of estimation and judgment in areas such as identifying circumstances that indicate an impairment may exist, identifying and grouping affected assets and developing the undiscounted and discounted future cash flows (used to estimate fair value in the absence of market-based value, in some instances) associated with the asset.  For assets held for sale, an impairment is recognized if the expected net sales price is less than its book value.  For regulated assets, the earnings impact of an impairment charge could be offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset, if rate recovery is probable.

Assumptions and Approach Used

The fair value of an asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale.  Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for the measurement, if available.  In the absence of quoted prices for identical or similar assets in active markets, management estimates fair value using various internal and external valuation methods including cash flow projections or other market indicators of fair value such as bids received, comparable sales or independent appraisals.  Cash flow estimates are based on relevant information available at the time the estimates are made.  Estimates of future cash flows are, by nature, highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results.  Also, when measuring fair value, management evaluates the characteristics of the asset or liability to determine if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Such characteristics include, for example, the condition and location of the asset or restrictions of the use of the asset.  Management performs depreciation studies that include a review of any external factors that may affect the useful life to determine composite depreciation rates and related lives which are subject to periodic review by state regulatory commissions for cost-based regulated assets.  The fair value of the asset could be different using different estimates and assumptions in these valuation techniques.


417


Effect if Different Assumptions Used

In connection with the evaluation of long-lived assets in accordance with the requirements of “Property, Plant and Equipment” accounting guidance, the fair value of the asset can vary if different estimates and assumptions would have been used in the applied valuation techniques.  The estimate for depreciation rates takes into account the history of interim capital replacements and the amount of salvage expected.  In cases of impairment, the best estimate of fair value was made using valuation methods based on the most current information at that time.  Fluctuations in realized sales proceeds versus the estimated fair value of the asset are generally due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, differences in subsequent market conditions, the level of bidder interest, timing and terms of the transactions and management’s analysis of the benefits of the transaction.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

AEP maintains a qualified, defined benefit pension plan (Qualified Plan), which covers substantially all nonunion and certain union employees, and unfunded, nonqualified supplemental plans (Nonqualified Plans) to provide benefits in excess of amounts permitted under the provisions of the tax law for participants in the Qualified Plan (collectively the Pension Plans).  Additionally, AEP entered into individual employment contracts with certain current and retired executives that provide additional retirement benefits as a part of the Nonqualified Plans.  AEP also sponsors other postretirement benefit plans to provide health and life insurance benefits for retired employees (Postretirement Plans).  The Pension Plans and Postretirement Plans are collectively referred to as the Plans.  The Registrant Subsidiaries participate in the Plans.

For a discussion of investment strategy, investment limitations, target asset allocations and the classification of investments within the fair value hierarchy, see “Investments Held in Trust for Future Liabilities” and “Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities” sections of Note 1.  See Note 8 for information regarding costs and assumptions for employee retirement and postretirement benefits.

The following table shows the net periodic cost (credit) by Registrant Subsidiary for the Plans:
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Net Periodic Cost (Credit)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
19,523

 
$
22,015

 
$
16,646

 
$
(9,765
)
 
$
72

 
$
15,540

I&M
 
20,148

 
21,893

 
16,563

 
(10,922
)
 
(3,638
)
 
11,358

OPCo
 
13,397

 
17,295

 
18,978

 
(9,436
)
 
579

 
20,282

PSO
 
9,709

 
11,022

 
7,495

 
(5,068
)
 
(1,737
)
 
4,821

SWEPCo
 
11,237

 
12,519

 
8,307

 
(5,933
)
 
(2,115
)
 
5,928


The net periodic benefit cost is calculated based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on the Plans’ assets.  In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption for 2015 , management evaluated input from actuaries and investment consultants, including their reviews of asset class return expectations as well as long-term inflation assumptions.  Management also considered historical returns of the investment markets and changes in tax rates which affect a portion of the Postretirement Plans’ assets.  Management anticipates that the investment managers employed for the Plans will invest the assets to generate future returns averaging 6% for the Qualified Plan and 6.75% for the Postretirement Plans.


418


The expected long-term rate of return on the Plans’ assets is based on AEP’s targeted asset allocation and expected investment returns for each investment category.  Assumptions for the Plans are summarized in the following table:
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
2015
Target
Asset
Allocation
 
Assumed/
Expected
Long-Term
Rate of
Return
 
2015
Target
Asset
Allocation
 
Assumed/
Expected
Long-Term
Rate of
Return
Equity
30
%
 
8.50
%
 
65
%
 
8.50
%
Fixed Income
55
%
 
4.10
%
 
33
%
 
4.10
%
Other Investments
15
%
 
7.30
%
 
%
 
%
Cash and Cash Equivalents
%
 
%
 
2
%
 
2.80
%
Total
100
%
 
 
 
100
%
 
 

Management regularly reviews the actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances the investments to the targeted allocation.  Management believes that 6% and 6.75% are reasonable estimates of the long-term rate of return on the Plans’ assets.  The Pension Plans’ assets had an actual gain of 10.6% and 8.1% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The Postretirement Plans’ assets had an actual gain of 7.2% and 14.3% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  Management will continue to evaluate the actuarial assumptions, including the expected rate of return, at least annually, and will adjust the assumptions as necessary.

AEP bases the determination of pension expense or income on a market-related valuation of assets, which reduces year-to-year volatility.  This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur.  Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return based on the market-related value of assets.  Since the market-related value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period, the future value of assets will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded.  As of December 31, 2014 , AEP had cumulative gains of approximately $270 million that remain to be recognized in the calculation of the market-related value of assets.  These unrecognized net actuarial gains may result in decreases in the future pension costs depending on several factors, including whether such gains at each measurement date exceed the corridor in accordance with “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” accounting guidance.  See the table below for the amount of cumulative gains by Registrant Subsidiary.
Cumulative Gains –
Deferred Asset Gain
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
34,949

I&M
 
32,198

OPCo
 
27,123

PSO
 
14,990

SWEPCo
 
15,788



419


The method used to determine the discount rate that AEP utilizes for determining future obligations is a duration-based method in which a hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds is constructed with cash flows matching the benefit plan liability.  The composite yield on the hypothetical bond portfolio is used as the discount rate for the plan.  The discount rate as of December 31, 2014 under this method was 4% for the Qualified Plan, 3.9% for the Nonqualified Plans and 4% for the Postretirement Plans.  Due to the effect of the unrecognized actuarial gains and based on an expected rate of return on the Pension Plans’ assets of 6%, discount rates of 4% and 3.9% and various other assumptions including adoption of updated mortality tables that the Society of Actuaries issued in October 2014, management estimates that the pension costs by Registrant Subsidiary for all pension plans will approximate the amounts in the following table.  Based on an expected rate of return on the OPEB plans’ assets of 6.75%, a discount rate of 4% and various other assumptions including adoption of updated mortality tables that the Society of Actuaries issued in October 2014, management estimates Postretirement Plan credits by Registrant Subsidiary will approximate the amounts in the following table.
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Estimated Postretirement
Plan Costs (Credits)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
 
(in thousands)
APCo
 
$
15,260

 
$
10,934

 
$
6,273

 
$
(13,464
)
 
$
(14,259
)
 
$
(15,064
)
I&M
 
16,962

 
12,599

 
9,104

 
(12,782
)
 
(13,291
)
 
(13,818
)
OPCo
 
10,213

 
7,216

 
4,299

 
(11,292
)
 
(11,724
)
 
(12,164
)
PSO
 
8,531

 
6,648

 
5,312

 
(5,974
)
 
(6,212
)
 
(6,458
)
SWEPCo
 
10,343

 
8,274

 
6,727

 
(6,943
)
 
(7,221
)
 
(7,517
)

Future actual costs will depend on future investment performance, changes in future discount rates and various other factors related to each Registrant Subsidiary’s populations participating in the Plans.  The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results.  The effects of a 50 basis point change to selective actuarial assumptions are included in the “Effect if Different Assumptions Used” section below.

The value of AEP’s Pension Plans’ assets increased to $5 billion as of December 31, 2014 from $4.7 billion as of December 31, 2013 primarily due to investment returns and contributions from AEP System companies in excess of benefit payments.  During 2014 , the Qualified Plan paid $289 million and the Nonqualified Plans paid $7 million in benefits to plan participants.  The value of AEP’s Postretirement Plans’ assets remained unchanged at $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 primarily due to investment returns and contributions from AEP System companies and the participants offsetting benefit payments.  The Postretirement Plans paid $134 million in benefits to plan participants during 2014 .  See Note 8 for complete details by Registrant Subsidiary.

Nature of Estimates Required

The Registrant Subsidiaries participate in AEP sponsored pension and other retirement and postretirement benefit plans in various forms covering all employees who meet eligibility requirements.  These benefits are accounted for under “Compensation” and “Plan Accounting” accounting guidance.  The measurement of pension and postretirement benefit obligations, costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions.

Assumptions and Approach Used

The critical assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors:

Discount rate
Compensation increase rate
Cash balance crediting rate
Health care cost trend rate
Expected return on plan assets

Other assumptions, such as retirement, mortality and turnover, are evaluated periodically and updated to reflect actual experience.

420


Effect if Different Assumptions Used

The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, longer or shorter life spans of participants or higher or lower lump sum versus annuity payout elections by plan participants.  These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension and postretirement benefit expense recorded.  If a 50 basis point change were to occur for the following assumptions, the approximate effect on the financial statements would be as follows:
APCo
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
(in thousands)
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(37,985
)
 
$
41,855

 
$
(13,735
)
 
$
15,081

Compensation Increase Rate
 
1,696

 
(1,522
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
7,823

 
(6,818
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
7,093

 
(6,433
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(2,360
)
 
2,561

 
(978
)
 
1,078

Compensation Increase Rate
 
650

 
(591
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
1,902

 
(1,779
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
1,086

 
(948
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(2,916
)
 
2,916

 
(1,378
)
 
1,378

I&M
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
(in thousands)
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(36,018
)
 
$
39,913

 
$
(8,443
)
 
$
9,301

Compensation Increase Rate
 
2,627

 
(2,375
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
9,530

 
(8,381
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
2,979

 
(2,624
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(2,075
)
 
2,251

 
(506
)
 
551

Compensation Increase Rate
 
571

 
(520
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
1,672

 
(1,563
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
415

 
(361
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(2,563
)
 
2,563

 
(983
)
 
983


421


OPCo
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
(in thousands)
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(26,978
)
 
$
29,695

 
$
(8,242
)
 
$
9,031

Compensation Increase Rate
 
1,652

 
(1,484
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
5,257

 
(4,603
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
3,632

 
(3,293
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(1,768
)
 
1,918

 
(522
)
 
568

Compensation Increase Rate
 
486

 
(443
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
1,424

 
(1,332
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
428

 
(372
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(2,184
)
 
2,184

 
(1,013
)
 
1,013

PSO
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
(in thousands)
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(14,011
)
 
$
15,348

 
$
(3,998
)
 
$
4,402

Compensation Increase Rate
 
1,556

 
(1,453
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
5,139

 
(4,835
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
1,418

 
(1,254
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(954
)
 
1,035

 
(240
)
 
262

Compensation Increase Rate
 
265

 
(241
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
767

 
(718
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
197

 
(171
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(1,174
)
 
1,174

 
(467
)
 
467

SWEPCo
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement
 
 
Pension Plans
 
Benefit Plans
 
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
+0.5%
 
-0.5%
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Effect on December 31, 2014 Benefit Obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
$
(15,113
)
 
$
16,576

 
$
(4,551
)
 
$
5,019

Compensation Increase Rate
 
1,849

 
(1,721
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
6,416

 
(6,043
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
1,388

 
(1,206
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect on 2014 Periodic Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount Rate
 
(999
)
 
1,084

 
(265
)
 
289

Compensation Increase Rate
 
277

 
(251
)
 
NA

 
NA

Cash Balance Crediting Rate
 
804

 
(752
)
 
NA

 
NA

Health Care Cost Trend Rate
 
NA

 
NA

 
218

 
(189
)
Expected Return on Plan Assets
 
(1,231
)
 
1,231

 
(515
)
 
515


NA
Not applicable.

422


ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Pronouncements Adopted in 2015

The FASB issued ASU 2014-08 “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant and Equipment” changing the presentation of discontinued operations on the statements of income and other requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new standard, a disposal of a component or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when the component meets the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale or is disposed. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations and disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations. Management adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. Management expects no impact on the financial statements in the first quarter of 2015.

Pronouncements Effective in the Future

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on revenue or net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2017.

The FASB issued ASU 2015-01 “Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items” eliminating the concept of extraordinary items for presentation on the face of the income statement. Under the new standard, a material event or transaction that is unusual in nature, infrequent or both shall be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Alternatively, it may be disclosed in the notes to financial statements. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted if applied from the beginning of a fiscal year. As applicable, this standard may change the presentation of amounts in the income statements. Management plans to adopt ASU 2015-01 effective January 1, 2016.

Future Accounting Changes

The FASB’s standard-setting process is ongoing and until new standards have been finalized and issued, management cannot determine the impact on the reporting of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations and financial position that may result from any such future changes.  The FASB is currently working on several projects including financial instruments, leases, insurance, hedge accounting and consolidation policy.  The ultimate pronouncements resulting from these and future projects could have an impact on future net income and financial position.

423
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
As of December 31, 2014
Each company shown indented is a subsidiary of the company immediately above which is not indented to the same degree. Subsidiaries not indented are directly owned by American Electric Power Company, Inc.


Name of Company
 
Location of
Incorporation
American Electric Power Service Corporation
 
New York
AEP Energy Supply LLC
 
Delaware
AEP C&I Company, LLC
 
Delaware
AEP Energy Partners, Inc.
 
Delaware
AEP Generation Resources Inc.
 
Delaware
AEP Generating Company
 
Ohio
AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC
 
Delaware
AEP Utilities, Inc.
 
Delaware
AEP Texas Central Company
 
Texas
AEP Texas Central Transition Funding LLC
 
Delaware
AEP Texas Central Transition Funding II LLC
 
Delaware
AEP Texas Central Transition Funding III LLC
 
Delaware
AEP Texas North Company
 
Texas
AEP Texas North Generation Company LLC
 
Delaware
Appalachian Power Company
 
Virginia
Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding LLC
 
Delaware
Indiana Michigan Power Company
 
Indiana
Kentucky Power Company
 
Kentucky
Kingsport Power Company
 
Virginia
Ohio Power Company
 
Ohio
Ohio Phase-In-Recovery Funding LLC
 
Delaware
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
 
Ohio
Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corporation
 
Indiana
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
 
Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company
 
Delaware
Wheeling Power Company
 
West Virginia







Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-128273, 333-66048, 333-62278 and 333-178044 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-200190 and 333-200956 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 20, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Electric Power Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015     



Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-200750 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 20, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries appearing in or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Appalachian Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 .

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015



Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-185087 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 20, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Indiana Michigan Power Company and subsidiaries appearing in or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Indiana Michigan Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015



Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-194991 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 20, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated appearing in or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southwestern Electric Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2015


Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014


The undersigned directors of AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20 th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ Sandra Beach Lin
Nicholas K. Akins
Sandra Beach Lin
 
 
/s/ David J. Anderson
/s/ Richard C. Notebaert
David J. Anderson
Richard C. Notebaert
 
 
/s/ J. Barnie Beasley, Jr.
/s/ Lionell L. Nowell, III
J. Barnie Beasley, Jr.
Lionel L. Nowell, III
 
 
/s/ Ralph D. Crosby, Jr.
/s/ Stephen S. Rasmussen
Ralph D. Crosby, Jr.
Stephen S. Rasmussen
 
 
/s/ Linda A. Goodspeed
/s/ Oliver G. Richard, III
Linda A. Goodspeed
Oliver G. Richard, III
 
 
/s/ Thomas E. Hoaglin
/s/ Sara Martinez Tucker
Thomas E. Hoaglin
Sara Martinez Tucker


Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014

The undersigned directors of the following companies (each respectively the "Company")
Company
State of Incorporation
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company
Virginia
Ohio
Oklahoma
Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ Mark C. McCullough
Nicholas K. Akins
Mark C. McCullough
 
 
/s/ Lisa M. Barton
/s/ Robert P. Powers
Lisa M. Barton
Robert P. Powers
 
 
/s/ David M. Feinberg
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
David M. Feinberg
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
/s/ Lana L. Hillebrand
/s/ Dennis E. Welch
Lana L. Hillebrand
Dennis E. Welch



Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014


The undersigned directors of INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY, an Indiana corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ David A. Lucas
Nicholas K. Akins
David A. Lucas
 
 
/s/ Lisa M. Barton
/s/ Mark C. McCullough
Lisa M. Barton
Mark C. McCullough
 
 
/s/ Paul Chodak, III
/s/ Robert P. Powers
Paul Chodak, III
Robert P. Powers
 
 
/s/ Thomas A. Kratt
/s/ Carla E. Simpson
Thomas A. Kratt
Carla E. Simpson
 
 
/s/ Marc E. Lewis
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Marc E. Lewis
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
 
/s/ Barry O. Wiard
 
Barry O. Wiard


Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014

The undersigned directors of the following companies (each respectively the "Company")
Company
State of Incorporation
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company
Virginia
Ohio
Oklahoma
Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ Mark C. McCullough
Nicholas K. Akins
Mark C. McCullough
 
 
/s/ Lisa M. Barton
/s/ Robert P. Powers
Lisa M. Barton
Robert P. Powers
 
 
/s/ David M. Feinberg
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
David M. Feinberg
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
/s/ Lana L. Hillebrand
/s/ Dennis E. Welch
Lana L. Hillebrand
Dennis E. Welch


Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014

The undersigned directors of the following companies (each respectively the "Company")
Company
State of Incorporation
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company
Virginia
Ohio
Oklahoma
Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ Mark C. McCullough
Nicholas K. Akins
Mark C. McCullough
 
 
/s/ Lisa M. Barton
/s/ Robert P. Powers
Lisa M. Barton
Robert P. Powers
 
 
/s/ David M. Feinberg
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
David M. Feinberg
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
/s/ Lana L. Hillebrand
/s/ Dennis E. Welch
Lana L. Hillebrand
Dennis E. Welch


Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014

The undersigned directors of the following companies (each respectively the "Company")
Company
State of Incorporation
Appalachian Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Southwestern Electric Power Company
Virginia
Ohio
Oklahoma
Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint NICHOLAS K. AKINS, JULIA A. SLOAT and BRIAN X. TIERNEY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 20th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
/s/ Mark C. McCullough
Nicholas K. Akins
Mark C. McCullough
 
 
/s/ Lisa M. Barton
/s/ Robert P. Powers
Lisa M. Barton
Robert P. Powers
 
 
/s/ David M. Feinberg
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
David M. Feinberg
Brian X. Tierney
 
 
/s/ Lana L. Hillebrand
/s/ Dennis E. Welch
Lana L. Hillebrand
Dennis E. Welch




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of American Electric Power Company, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Appalachian Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Indiana Michigan Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Ohio Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of Oklahoma;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas K. Akins, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Southwestern Electric Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of American Electric Power Company, Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Appalachian Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Indiana Michigan Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Ohio Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of Oklahoma;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian X. Tierney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Southwestern Electric Power Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2015
By:           
 
/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015

 
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Appalachian Power Company and will be retained by Appalachian Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Indiana Michigan Power Company and will be retained by Indiana Michigan Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Ohio Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ohio Power Company and will be retained by Ohio Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Public Service Company of Oklahoma and will be retained by Public Service Company of Oklahoma and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(a)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas K. Akins, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicholas K. Akins
Nicholas K. Akins
Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southwestern Electric Power Company and will be retained by Southwestern Electric Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Appalachian Power Company and will be retained by Appalachian Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Indiana Michigan Power Company and will be retained by Indiana Michigan Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Ohio Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ohio Power Company and will be retained by Ohio Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Public Service Company of Oklahoma and will be retained by Public Service Company of Oklahoma and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Exhibit 32(b)

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.


Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code


In connection with the Annual Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brian X. Tierney
Brian X. Tierney
Chief Financial Officer


February 20, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southwestern Electric Power Company and will be retained by Southwestern Electric Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Exhibit 95


MINE SAFETY INFORMATION

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) imposes stringent health and safety standards on various mining operations. The Mine Act and its related regulations affect numerous aspects of mining operations, including training of mine personnel, mining procedures, equipment used in mine emergency procedures, mine plans and other matters. SWEPCo, through its ownership of Dolet Hills Lignite Company (DHLC), and KPCo and AGR, through their joint ownership of the Connor Run fly ash impoundment, are subject to the provisions of the Mine Act. (Ownership of the Conner Run fly ash impoundment transferred from Ohio Power Company to Kentucky Power Company and AEP Generation Resources effective December 31, 2013).

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) requires companies that operate mines to include in their periodic reports filed with the SEC, certain mine safety information covered by the Mine Act. DHLC and Connor Run received the following notices of violation and proposed assessments under the Mine Act for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 :
 
 
 
DHLC
 
 
Conner Run
Number of Citations for S&S Violations of Mandatory Health or
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Safety Standards under 104 *
 
 

 
 
 

Number of Orders Issued under 104(b) *
 
 

 
 
 

Number of Citations and Orders for Unwarrantable Failure
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
to Comply with Mandatory Health or Safety Standards under 104(d) *
 
 

 
 
 

Number of Flagrant Violations under 110(b)(2) *
 
 

 
 
 

Number of Imminent Danger Orders Issued under 107(a) *
 
 

 
 
 

Total Dollar Value of Proposed Assessments
 
$

 
 
$

Number of Mining-related Fatalities
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*
References to sections under the Mine Act.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

There are currently no legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.