(Mark One)
Commission File Number:
1-4639
X
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
CTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
35-0225010
(State or
other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS
Employer
Identification Number)
905 West Boulevard North, Elkhart, IN
46514
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 574-293-7511
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered |
|||
Common stock, without par value | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes
X
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
X
No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of CTS Corporation, based upon the closing sales price of CTS common stock on June 25, 2004, was approximately $405.9 million. There were 36,734,828 shares of common stock, without par value, outstanding on March 1, 2005.
(1) | Portions of the 2004 Annual Report to shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in Parts I and II. |
(2) | Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 4, 2005, are incorporated by reference in Part III. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
CTS Corporation (CTS) is a global manufacturer of components and sensors and a supplier of electronics manufacturing services. CTS was established in 1896 as a provider of high-quality telephone products and was incorporated as an Indiana corporation in February 1929. The principal executive offices are located in Elkhart, Indiana. CTS maintains a website at http://www.ctscorp.com. Filings on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and amendments thereto made by CTS with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be obtained, free of charge, on this website, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing.
CTS designs, manufactures, assembles, and sells a broad line of components and sensors and provides electronics manufacturing services (EMS) primarily to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), for the automotive, communications, and computer markets. CTS operates manufacturing facilities located throughout North America, Asia, and Europe and serves major markets globally. Sales and marketing is accomplished through CTS sales engineers, independent manufacturers representatives, and distributors.
CTS has two reportable business segments: 1) Components and Sensors and 2) Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS).
Components and sensors are products which perform specific electronic functions for a given product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Components and sensors consist principally of automotive sensors and actuators used in commercial or consumer vehicles; electronic components used in cellular handsets, communications infrastructure and computer markets; low temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) electronic substrates used in various communications and automotive applications; terminators, including ClearONE terminators, used in computer and other high speed applications, switches, resistor networks, and potentiometers used to serve multiple markets.
EMS includes the higher level assembly of electronic and mechanical components into a finished subassembly or assembly performed under a contract manufacturing agreement with an OEM or other contract manufacturer. EMS also includes design and manufacture of interconnect systems and complex backplanes as may be required by the customer.
Products from the Components and Sensors business segment are principally sold into three major OEM markets: 1) automotive, 2) communications, and 3) computer. Products from the EMS business segment are principally sold into the communications and computer OEM markets. Other smaller markets include OEM customers in consumer electronics, instruments and controls, defense/aerospace, networking, and medical diagnostic and imaging industries.
1
The following tables provide a breakdown of net sales by business segment and market in dollars and as a percent of consolidated net sales:
Components & Sensors
|
EMS
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Net sales $ in millions) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Markets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive | $ | 132.3 | $ | 118.1 | $ | 115.9 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 132.3 | $ | 118.1 | $ | 115.9 | ||||||||||
Communications | 63.3 | 74.4 | 112.7 | 79.2 | 44.3 | 28.2 | 142.5 | 118.7 | 140.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Computer | 21.3 | 29.8 | 16.9 | 183.7 | 161.2 | 156.1 | 205.0 | 191.0 | 173.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | 44.1 | 30.6 | 25.4 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 51.5 | 35.2 | 28.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales | $ | 261.0 | $ | 252.9 | $ | 270.9 | $ | 270.3 | $ | 210.1 | $ | 186.9 | $ | 531.3 | $ | 463.0 | $ | 457.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components & Sensors
|
EMS
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(As a % of
consolidated net sales) |
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Markets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive | 25% | 26% | 25% | % | % | % | 25% | 26% | 25% | |||||||||||||||||||
Communications | 12% | 16% | 25% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 27% | 25% | 31% | |||||||||||||||||||
Computer | 3% | 6% | 4% | 35% | 35% | 34% | 38% | 41% | 38% | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | 9% | 7% | 5% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 10% | 8% | 6% | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
% of consolidated net sales | 49% | 55% | 59% | 51% | 45% | 41% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Net sales to external customers, operating earnings, total assets by segment, net sales, and long-lived assets by geographic area, are contained in Note M, Business Segments, appearing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15 (a) (1) and (2).
General market conditions in the global automotive, communications, and computer markets and in the overall economy also affect the business of CTS. Any adverse occurrence that results in a significant decline in the volume of sales in these industries, or in an overall downturn in the business and operations of our customers in these industries, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The following table identifies major products by their business segment and markets. Many products are sold into several OEM markets:
Product Description |
Automotive
Market |
Communications
Market |
Computer
Market |
Other
Markets |
---|---|---|---|---|
Components and Sensors: | ||||
Ceramic Filters and Duplexers | | | | |
Quartz Crystals, Clocks,
Precision Oscillators and Frequency Modules |
| | | |
Automotive Sensors | | |||
Resistor Networks | | | | |
ClearONE Terminators | | | | |
DIP Switches and
Potentiometers |
| | | |
Actuators | | |||
Low Temperature
Cofired Ceramics (LTCC) |
| | ||
Piezoceramics Products | | |||
EMS: | ||||
Integrated Interconnect
Systems and Backpanels |
| | | |
Pointing Sticks/
Cursor Controls |
| |
3
CTS sales engineers and independent manufacturers representatives sell products from both the Components and Sensors business segment and the EMS business segment to OEMs. CTS maintains sales offices in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Scotland, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United States. Approximately 81% of 2004 net sales was attributable to coverage by CTS sales engineers.
CTS sales engineers generally service the largest customers with application specific products. The engineers work closely with major customers in designing and developing products to meet specific customer requirements.
CTS utilizes the services of independent manufacturers representatives in the United States and other countries for customers not serviced directly by CTS sales engineers for both of its business segments. Independent manufacturers representatives receive commissions from CTS. During 2004, 14% of net sales was attributable to coverage by independent manufacturers representatives. CTS also uses independent distributors for customers in its Components and Sensors business segment. Independent distributors purchase component and sensor products from CTS for resale to customers. In 2004, independent distributors accounted for approximately 5% of net sales.
CTS utilizes a wide variety of raw materials and purchased parts in its manufacturing processes. The following are the most significant raw materials and purchased parts, identified by business segment:
Components |
---|
and Sensors: | Conductive inks and contactors which contain precious metals (primarily silver and palladium), passive electronic components, integrated circuits and semiconductors, rare earths (for ceramic compositions), ceramic components, plastic components, molding compounds, printed circuit boards and assemblies, quartz blanks and crystals, wire harness assemblies, copper, brass, and steel-based raw materials and compounds. |
EMS: | Power supplies and converters, prefabricated steel, printed circuit boards, passive electronics components and semiconductors, integrated circuits, connectors, cables, and modules. |
These raw materials are purchased from several vendors, and except for certain semiconductors, rare earth, and conductive inks, CTS does not believe it is dependent upon one or a limited number of vendors. Although CTS purchases all of its semiconductors, rare earth, and conductive inks from a limited number of vendors, alternative sources are available. In 2004, substantially all of these materials were available in adequate quantities to meet CTS production demands.
CTS does not currently anticipate any raw material shortages that would slow production. However, the lead times between the placement of orders for certain raw materials and purchased parts and actual delivery to CTS may vary. Occasionally CTS might need to order raw materials in greater quantities and at higher than optimal prices to compensate for the variability of lead times for delivery.
Precious metal prices may have a significant effect on the cost and selling price of many CTS products, particularly some ceramic filters, sensors, resistor networks, and switches.
4
Working capital requirements are generally dependent on the overall level of business activities. CTS does not usually buy inventories or manufacture products without actual or reasonably anticipated customer orders, except for some standard, off-the-shelf distributor products. CTS is not generally required to carry significant amounts of inventory in anticipation of rapid delivery requirements because most customer orders are custom built. CTS has just-in-time arrangements with certain major customers and vendors to efficiently meet delivery requirements.
CTS carries raw materials, including certain semiconductors, work-in-process, and finished goods inventories which are unique to particular customers. In the event of reductions or cancellations of orders, some inventories may not be useable or returnable to vendors for credit. CTS generally imposes charges for the reduction or cancellation of orders by customers, and these charges are usually sufficient to cover a significant portion of the financial exposure of CTS for inventories that are unique to a customer. CTS does not customarily grant special return or payment privileges to customers. CTS working capital requirements and businesses reflect some seasonality and cyclicality. For example, the Components and Sensors business segment experiences lower third quarter sales, due to the automotive industrys model year changeovers and summer shutdowns. The EMS business segment experiences higher fourth quarter sales in line with its industry, particularly from increased computing market demand.
CTS maintains a program of obtaining and protecting U.S. and non-U.S. patents and trademarks. CTS believes its success is not materially dependent on the existence or duration of any patent, group of patents, or trademarks. CTS was issued 14 new U.S. patents in 2004 and currently holds in excess of 300 U.S. patents with hundreds of non-U.S. counterpart patents.
CTS has licensed the right to use several of its patents to both U.S. and non-U.S. companies. In 2004, license and royalty income was less than 1% of net sales. CTS believes its success is not materially dependent upon any licensing arrangement where CTS is either the licensor or licensee.
CTS 15 largest customers represented 69% of net sales in 2004, 71% of net sales in 2003 and 73% of net sales in 2002. This percentage is decreasing as the Company continues efforts to broaden its customer base, particularly in automotive and infrastructure offerings. Sales to Hewlett-Packard Company (Hewlett-Packard) amounted to 33% of net sales in 2004, 2003, and 2002. Sales to Motorola, Inc. (Motorola) accounted for 13% of net sales in 2004 and 2003, and 12% of net sales in 2002.
Components and Sensors business segment revenues from Motorola were less than 10% of the segments revenue in 2004 and 2003. The Components and Sensors business segment revenues from Motorola represented $38.6 million, or 14%, of the segments revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002.
EMS business segment revenues from Hewlett-Packard represented $177.3 million, or 66%, $151.8 million, or 72%, and $150.4 million, or 80%, of the segments revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. EMS business segment revenues from Motorola were $60.9 million, or 23%, and $40.2 million, or 19%, of the segments revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. EMS business segment revenues from Motorola were less than 10% of the segment's revenue in 2002.
5
Although the Company is making efforts to broaden its customer base, it depends on a small number of customers for a large portion of its business. Changes in the level of its customers orders have, in the past, had a significant impact on its operating results. If a major customer reduces the amount of business it does with CTS, or substantially changes the terms of that business, there would be an adverse impact on CTS operating results.
Although the Company is making efforts to broaden its customer base, it expects to continue to depend on sales to its major customers. As CTS customers are under no obligation to continue to do business with the Company on a long-term basis, there is always the possibility that one or more customers may choose to work with a competitor and reduce their business with CTS. Customers may also reduce or delay their business with CTS because of economic or other conditions or decisions that reduce their need for CTS products or services. Since it is difficult to replace lost business on a timely basis, it is likely that CTS operating results would be adversely affected if one or more of its major customers were to cancel, delay or reduce a large amount of business with CTS in the future. If one or more of its customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for CTS products and/or services, CTS operating results, financial condition, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Order backlog may not provide an accurate indication of present or future revenue levels for CTS. For many components and sensors and EMS products, the period between receipt of orders and expected delivery is relatively short. Additionally, large orders from major customers may include backlog covering an extended period of time. Production scheduling and delivery for these orders could be changed or canceled by the customer on relatively short notice.
The following table shows order backlog by segment and in total as of January 30, 2005 and January 25, 2004, excluding the impact of the SMTEK acquisition in 2005 (refer to Note P, Subsequent Event, appearing in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15(a) (1) and (2)).
($ in millions) | January 30, 2005 | January 25, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
Components and Sensors | $ | 57.8 | $ | 52.1 | ||||
EMS | 12.7 | 18.5 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total | $ | 70.5 | $ | 70.6 | ||||
|
|
Order backlog at the end of January 2005 will generally be filled during the 2005 fiscal year.
In the Components and Sensors business segment, CTS competes with many U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturers principally on the basis of product features, price, technology, quality, reliability, delivery, and service. Most CTS product lines encounter significant global competition. The number of significant competitors varies from product line to product line. No one competitor competes with CTS in every product line, but many competitors are larger and more diversified than CTS. Some competitors are divisions or affiliates of CTS customers.
In the EMS segment, CTS competes with a number of well-established U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturers on the basis of process capability, price, technology, quality, reliability, and delivery in the markets in which it participates. Some of its competitors have greater manufacturing and financial resources. However, CTS generally does not pursue extremely high volume, highly price sensitive business, as do some of its major competitors. Some competitors are also CTS customers for components and sensors, as well as EMS products.
6
In both the Components and Sensors and EMS business segments, some customers have reduced or plan to reduce their number of suppliers, while increasing the volume of their purchases. Most customers are demanding higher quality, reliability, and delivery standards from CTS as well as its competitors. These trends create opportunities for CTS, but also increase the risk of loss of business to competitors. CTS is subject to competitive risks that are part of the nature of the electronics industry, including short product life cycles and technical obsolescence.
CTS believes it competes most successfully in custom products manufactured to meet specific applications of major OEMs and with EMS products oriented toward high mix and low to medium volume outsourcing needs of OEMs.
In 2004, 63% of net sales to external customers originated from non-U.S. operations compared to 60% in 2003 and 56% in 2002. At December 31, 2004, approximately 36% of total CTS assets were located at non-U.S. operations compared to 37% of total CTS assets at the end of 2003. A substantial portion of these assets, other than cash and equivalents, cannot readily be liquidated. CTS believes the business risks to its non-U.S. operations, though substantial, are normal risks for non-U.S. businesses. These risks include currency controls and changes in currency exchange rates, longer collection cycles, political and transportation risks, economic downturns and inflation, government regulations, and expropriation. CTS non-U.S. manufacturing facilities are located in Canada, China, Mexico, Scotland, Singapore, and Taiwan.
Net sales to external customers originating from non-U.S. operations for the Components and Sensors business segment were $201.1 million in 2004, compared to $144.0 million in 2003 and $153.8 million in 2002. Net sales to external customers originating from non-U.S. operations for the EMS business segment were $132.7 million in 2004, compared to $132.3 million in 2003 and $104.0 million in 2002. Additional information about net sales to external customers, operating earnings and total assets by segment, and net sales to external customers and long-lived assets by geographic area, is contained in Note M, Business Segments, appearing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15 (a) (1) and (2).
In 2004, 2003 and 2002, CTS spent $19.1 million, $21.5 million, and $24.1 million, respectively, for research and development. The reductions in research and development spending from 2002 to 2004 reflect savings due to organizational consolidation, changing business mix, and streamlining of research and development activities. Significant ongoing research and development activities continue in CTS Components and Sensors business segment, particularly for automotive products in support of growth initiatives. Our research and development investment is primarily focused at expanded applications and new product development, as well as current product and process enhancements. Research and development expenditures in the EMS business segment are typically very low.
CTS believes a strong commitment to research and development is required for future growth. Most CTS research and development activities relate to developing new, innovative products and technologies, improving product flow, and adding product value to meet the current and future needs of its customers. CTS provides its customers with full systems support to ensure quality and reliability through all phases of design, launch, and manufacturing to meet or exceed customer requirements. Many such research and development activities are for the benefit of one or a limited number of customers or potential customers. CTS expenses all research and development costs as incurred.
CTS employed 4,487 people at December 31, 2004, and 73% of these people were employed outside the United States. Approximately 465 CTS employees at one location in the United States were covered by two collective bargaining agreements as of December 31, 2004. One agreement will expire in 2009 and the other will expire in 2008. CTS employed 5,041 people at December 31, 2003.
7
Information responsive to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K is contained under the caption "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit 99(a) to this report contains updated risk factors applicable to CTS business and an investment in CTS securities. This exhibit, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and in the documents incorporated by reference herein. In addition, this exhibit updates and supersedes the descriptions of risk factors in CTS prospectuses related to CTS active registration statements listed in Exhibit 23 hereto.
As of March 1, 2005, CTS has manufacturing facilities, administrative, research and development and sales offices in the following locations. This list includes facilities acquired in January 2005 in connection with the merger of CTS with SMTEK International, Inc. Refer also to Note P, "Subsequent Event," appearing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) and (2).
Manufacturing Facilities
|
|
Square
Footage |
|
Owned/
Leased |
Business Segment
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albuquerque, New Mexico | 267,000 | Owned | Components and Sensors | ||
Ayutthya, Thailand | 40,000 | Owned (1) | EMS | ||
Berne, Indiana | 249,000 | Owned (2) | Components and Sensors | ||
Burbank, California | 9,200 | Owned | Components and Sensors | ||
Burbank, California | 4,850 | Leased | Components and Sensors | ||
Dongguan, China | 39,560 | Leased | Components and Sensors | ||
Elkhart, Indiana | 319,000 | Owned (2) | Components and Sensors | ||
Glasgow, Scotland | 75,000 | Owned | Components and Sensors and EMS | ||
Glasgow, Scotland | 20,000 | Leased | Components and Sensors and EMS | ||
Glasgow, Scotland | 37,000 | Leased | Components and Sensors and EMS | ||
Kaohsiung, Taiwan | 133,000 | Owned (3) | Components and Sensors | ||
Londonderry, New Hampshire | 83,000 | Leased | EMS | ||
Marlborough, Massachusetts | 69,400 | Leased | EMS | ||
Matamoros, Mexico | 51,000 | Owned | Components and Sensors | ||
Moorpark, California | 115,000 | Leased | EMS | ||
Santa Clara, California | 44,700 | Leased | EMS | ||
Singapore | 159,000 | Owned (4) | Components and Sensors and EMS | ||
Streetsville, Ontario, Canada | 112,000 | Owned | Components and Sensors | ||
Tianjin, China | 210,000 | Owned (5) | Components and Sensors and EMS | ||
West Lafayette, Indiana | 102,500 | Owned (2) | Components and Sensors | ||
|
|||||
Total Manufacturing | 2,140,210 | ||||
|
(1)
The land and building are collateral for a credit facility
with BANKTHAI
(2) The land and buildings are collateral for the revolving credit agreement. (3) Ground lease through 2007; restrictions on use and transfer apply. (4) Ground lease through 2039; restrictions on use and transfer apply. (5) Land Use Rights Agreement through 2050 includes transfer, lease and mortgage rights. |
8
CTS regularly assesses the adequacy of its manufacturing facilities for manufacturing capacity, available labor and location to its markets and major customers. Management believes CTS manufacturing facilities are suitable and adequate, and have sufficient capacity to meet its current needs. The extent of utilization varies from plant to plant and with general economic conditions. CTS also reviews the operating costs of its facilities and may from time-to-time relocate or move a portion of its manufacturing activities in order to reduce operating costs and improve asset utilization and cash flow. Refer also to Note C, Restructuring and Impairment Charges, and Note B, Asset Sales, appearing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15 (a) (1) and (2).
Certain processes in the manufacture of CTS current and past products create hazardous waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and regulations. CTS has been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups, that it is or may be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) regarding hazardous waste remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to these non-CTS sites, CTS has an ongoing practice of providing reserves for probable remediation activities at certain of its manufacturing locations and for claims and proceedings against CTS with respect to other environmental matters. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information relating to all such matters, either adequate provision for probable costs has been made, or the ultimate costs resulting will not materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of CTS.
Certain claims are pending against CTS with respect to matters arising out of the ordinary conduct of its business. For all claims, in the opinion of management, based upon presently available information, either adequate provision for anticipated costs has been accrued or the ultimate anticipated costs resulting will not materially affect CTS consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, no matter was submitted to a vote of CTS security holders.
9
The principal market for CTS common stock is the New York Stock Exchange using the symbol CTS. Quarterly market high and low trading prices for CTS Common Stock for each quarter of the past two years and the amount of dividends declared during the previous two years is located in Shareholder Information, appearing in the 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders, portions of which are filed herewith as Exhibit (13) and are incorporated herein by reference (2004 Annual Report). On March 1, 2005, there were approximately 1,610 CTS common shareholders of record.
CTS current practice is to pay quarterly dividends at the rate of $0.03 per share, or an annual rate of $0.12 per share. The revolving credit agreement limits CTS ability to pay dividends, but it permits CTS to continue to pay quarterly dividends at the rate of $0.03 per share. The declaration of a dividend and the amount of any such dividend is subject to earnings, anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, other investment requirements, the financial condition of CTS, and any other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors.
In July 2004, CTS Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to one million shares of its common stock in the open market during the next two years. This July 2004 authorization effectively canceled the boards previous stock repurchase authorization. Reacquired shares will be used to support equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate purposes. During 2004, CTS repurchased 183,000 shares at a total cost of $2.0 million. At December 31, 2004, CTS was authorized to repurchase approximately 817,000 additional shares.
A summary of selected financial data for CTS for each of the previous five years is contained in the Five-Year Summary, included in the 2004 Annual Report and incorporated herein by reference.
Certain acquisitions, divestitures, closures of operations or product lines, and certain accounting reclassifications affect the comparability of information contained in the Five-Year Summary.
Information about results of operations, liquidity and capital resources for the three previous years, is contained in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (2002-2004), included in the 2004 Annual Report and incorporated herein by reference.
A discussion of market risk for CTS is contained in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (2002-2004), included in the 2004 Annual Report and incorporated herein by reference and in Note A, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Financial Instruments, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15 (a) (1) and (2).
Consolidated financial statements, meeting the requirements of Regulation S-X, the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Quarterly Results of Operations and Per Share Data appear in the financial statements and supplementary financial data as noted in the Index appearing under Item 15 (a)(1) and (2), and are included in the 2004 Annual Report and incorporated herein by reference.
10
None.
CTS maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by CTS in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Management recognizes that a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. As of December 31, 2004, the end of the year covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of CTS management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of CTS disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that CTS disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level referred to above. There were no changes in CTS internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTS internal controls over financial reporting.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, CTS included a report of managements assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Managements report is included in CTS 2004 Financial Statements under the caption entitled Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing as noted in the Index to the consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15(a)(1) and (2).
None.
Information responsive to Items 401(a) and 401(e) of Regulation S-K pertaining to directors of CTS is contained under the caption Item 1. Election of Directors in the 2005 Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (2005 Proxy Statement), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information responsive to Item 405 of Regulation S-K pertaining to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is contained in the 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information responsive to Items 401(h) and 401(i) of Regulation S-K pertaining to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is contained under the caption "2004 Committees of the Board, Audit Committee" in the 2005 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
CTS has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller. CTS Code of Ethics is posted on its website at www.ctscorp.com/governance/code_of_ethics.htm.
The individuals in the following list were elected as executive officers of CTS at the annual meeting of the Board of Directors on April 28, 2004. They are expected to serve as executive officers until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors, scheduled to be held on or about May 4, 2005, at which time the election of officers will be considered again by the Board of Directors.
11
Name | Age | Positions and Offices |
Donald K. Schwanz | 60 | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Donald R. Schroeder | 56 | Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
Vinod M. Khilnani | 52 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
H. Tyler Buchanan | 52 | Senior Vice President |
James L. Cummins | 49 | Senior Vice President Administration |
Richard G. Cutter, III | 58 | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Thomas A. Kroll | 50 | Vice President and Controller |
Matthew W. Long | 43 | Treasurer |
Donald K. Schwanz was elected President in January 2001 and named Chief Executive Officer effective October 1, 2001. Mr. Schwanz was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors on January 1, 2002. From January 2001 through October 1, 2001, Mr. Schwanz served as Chief Operating Officer of CTS. Prior to joining CTS in January 2001, he was President of the Industrial Control Business at Honeywell, Inc. since 1999, and had been with Honeywell, an aerospace company, since 1979, with positions of increasing responsibility.
Donald R. Schroeder was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, effective December 20, 2000. From February 2000 to December 2000, Mr. Schroeder served as Vice President Business Development and Chief Technology Officer. From 1995 to January 2000, Mr. Schroeder served as Vice President Sales and Marketing.
Vinod M. Khilnani was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective May 7, 2001. Prior to joining CTS, Mr. Khilnani was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Simpson Industries, Inc. from 1997 to December 2000, and was appointed Vice President and Corporate Controller of Metaldyne Corporation, a $2.5 billion automotive components company created through the merger of Simpson Industries and Masco Tech, in December 2000.
H. Tyler Buchanan was elected Senior Vice President, effective December 31, 2001. Prior to this, Mr. Buchanan was Vice President since August 2000, and Vice President and General Manager, CTS Automotive Products. He has held positions of varying responsibility with CTS since 1977.
James L. Cummins was elected Senior Vice President Administration, effective December 31, 2001. Prior to this, Mr. Cummins was Vice President Human Resources since 1994. From 1991 through 1994, he served as Director of Human Resources.
Richard G. Cutter, III was elected Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary effective December 31, 2001. Prior to this, Mr. Cutter was Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2000, and General Counsel since January 2000. Prior to joining CTS, he was General Counsel with General Electric - Silicones, a global manufacturer of silicone-based raw materials.
Thomas A. Kroll was elected Vice President and Controller on October 31, 2002. Prior to this, Mr. Kroll served as Controller Group Accounting since joining CTS in November 2000. Prior to joining CTS, he served as Corporate Controller for Fedders Corporation from 1995.
Matthew W. Long was elected Treasurer effective May 1, 2003. From December 2000 through May 2003, Mr. Long served as Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Long was Corporate Controller for Morgan Drive Away, Inc., a transportation services company, from July through December 2000. Prior to this, he served as Controller with CTS Electrocomponents operating unit and as Corporate External Financial Accounting Manager from 1996 through July 2000.
12
Information responsive to Item 402 of Regulation S-K pertaining to management remuneration is contained in the 2005 Proxy Statement under the captions Director Compensation and Executive Compensation, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information responsive to Item 403 of Regulation S-K pertaining to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is contained in the 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption Stock Ownership Information, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information responsive to Item 201(d)(2) of Regulation S-K pertaining to equity compensation plan information is summarized in the following table:
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights. | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in Column (a) ) | ||||||||||
Plan Category | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
1,636,900 |
$16.80 |
6,111,587 |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
56,261 |
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total | 1,693,161 | 6,111,587 | ||||||||||
|
|
_________________
(1) | CTS has a stock retirement plan for nonemployee directors under which an account for each nonemployee director is annually credited with 800 common stock units. Through January 2004, CTS annually credited each deferred stock account with an additional number of common stock units representing the amount of dividends which would have been paid on an equivalent number of shares of CTS common stock for each quarter during the preceding calendar year. Upon retirement, the nonemployee director is entitled to receive one share of the Companys common stock for each common stock unit in his deferred stock account. CTS has issued only treasury shares for common stock units under the plan. In the past, the New York Stock Exchange has not required companies to obtain shareholder approval when issuing treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market under compensatory plans. As of December 1, 2004, this plan was amended to preclude crediting any additional units under the plan. At December 31, 2004, the deferred stock accounts contained a total of 56,261 units. |
Information responsive to Item 404 of Regulation S-K is contained in the 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption "Certain Business Relationships" and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information contained in the 2005 Proxy Statement under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" is incorporated herein by reference.
13
The list of financial statements and schedules required by Item 15 (a) (1) and (2) is contained on page S-1 herein.
All references to documents filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, were filed by CTS Corporation, File No. 1-4639.
(3)(i) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 1, 1998). |
(3)(ii) | Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 1, 1998). |
(10)(a) | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2001, between the Company and Donald K. Schwanz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, filed with the Commission on November 5, 2001). * |
(10)(b) | Prototype officers and directors indemnification agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, filed with the Commission on March 21, 1996). |
(10)(c) | CTS Corporation 1988 Restricted Stock and Cash Bonus Plan, approved by the shareholders on April 28, 1989, as amended and restated on May 9, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 1997, filed with the Commission on August 12, 1997). * |
(10)(d) | CTS Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan, approved by the shareholders on April 26, 1996, as amended and restated on May 9, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 1997, filed with the Commission on August 12, 1997). * |
(10)(e) | CTS Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, approved by the shareholders on March 9, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(c) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2001, filed with the Commission on April 27, 2001). * |
(10)(f) | Rights Agreement between CTS Corporation and National City Bank, N.A., (successor to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.) dated August 28,1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 1, 1998). |
(10)(g) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 15, 2001, to the Rights Agreement dated as of August 28, 1998, between CTS Corporation and National City Bank, N.A., (successor to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on April 29, 2002). |
(10)(h) | Amendment No. 2, dated as of April 22, 2002, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of August 28, 1998, between CTS Corporation and National City Bank, N.A., (successor to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.), as amended on October 15, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on April 29, 2002). |
(10)(i) | CTS Corporation Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective April 30, 1990, as amended incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003, filed with the Commission on April 23, 2003. * |
(10)(j) | Amendment dated as of December 1, 2004, to the CTS Corporation Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective April 30, 1990, as amended, filed herewith. * |
14
(10)(k) | Prototype Severance Agreements between CTS Corporation and its officers, general managers and managing directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(k) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Commission on February 14, 2003). * |
(10)(l) | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 2002, among CTS Corporation, Halifax Fund, L.P., DeAm Convertible Arbitrage Fund, Ltd., Palladin Overseas Fund, Ltd., Lancer Securities (Cayman) Ltd., Palladin Partners I, L.P., Steelhead Investments, Ltd., and Ram Trading, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2002, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2002). |
(10)(m) | Form of 6½% Convertible Subordinated Debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2002, filed with the Commission on April 22, 2002). |
(10)(n) | CTS Corporation Management Incentive Plan approved by the shareholders on May 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed with the Commission on March 18, 2002). * |
(10)(o) | CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(t) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Commission on February 14, 2003). * |
(10)(p) | Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly known as the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003, filed with the Commission on July 25, 2003). * |
(10)(q) | Credit Agreement dated as of July 14, 2003 by and among CTS Corporation, the Lenders named therein and Harris Trust and Savings Bank as L/C Issuer and Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003, filed with the Commission on July 25, 2003). |
(10)(r) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 17, 2004, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 14, 2003 by and among CTS Corporation, the Lenders named therein and Harris Trust and Savings Bank as L/C Issuer and Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (1) to the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2002), filed with the Commission on July 20, 2004. |
(10)(s) | Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 12, 2004, to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 14, 2003 by and among CTS Corporation, the Lenders named therein and Harris Trust and Savings Bank as L/C Issuer and Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the current report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2004, filed with the Commission on October 15, 2004. |
(10)(t) | CTS Corporation 2003 Excess Benefit Retirement Plan, as adopted effective July 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2003, filed with the Commission on October 29, 2003). * |
(10)(u) | Amendment No. 1, effective June 1, 2004, to the CTS Corporation 2003 Excess Benefit Retirement Plan, as adopted effective July 1, 2003, filed herewith. |
(10)(v) | Purchase Agreement dated May 5, 2004 by and between CTS Corporation and Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., as Initial Purchaser (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2004, filed with the Commission on May 19, 2004). |
(10)(w) | Indenture dated as of May 11, 2004 by and between CTS Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2004, filed with the Commission on May 19, 2004). |
15
(10)(x) | CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan, Prototype Incentive Stock Option Agreement and Prototype Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004, filed with the Commission on October 19, 2004).* |
(10)(y) | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 16, 2004 by and among SMTEK International, Inc., Cardinal Acquisition, Inc. and CTS Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2004, filed with the Commission on November 17, 2004). |
(10)(z) | Prototype Non-employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, filed herewith.* |
(10)(aa) | Director and Named Executive Officer Compensation, filed herewith.* |
(13) | Portions of the 2004 Annual Report to shareholders incorporated herein, filed herewith. |
(21) | Subsidiaries filed herewith. |
(23) | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
(31)(a) | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(31)(b) | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(32)(a) | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(32)(b) | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(99)(a) | Risk Factors, filed herewith. |
_________________
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
16
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CTS Corporation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Date: March 3, 2005 | By | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani | ||
|
||||
Vinod M. Khilnani
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Donald K. Schwanz | ||
|
|||
Donald K. Schwanz, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Walter S. Catlow | ||
|
|||
Walter S. Catlow, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Lawrence J. Ciancia | ||
|
|||
Lawrence J. Ciancia, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Thomas G. Cody | ||
|
|||
Thomas G. Cody, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Gerald H. Frieling, Jr. | ||
|
|||
Gerald H. Frieling, Jr., Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Roger R. Hemminghaus | ||
|
|||
Roger R. Hemminghaus, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Michael A. Henning | ||
|
|||
Michael A. Henning, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Robert A. Profusek | ||
|
|||
Robert A. Profusek, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Patricia K. Vincent | ||
|
|||
Patricia K. Vincent, Director | |||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani | ||
|
|||
Vinod M. Khilnani
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|||
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Thomas A. Kroll | ||
|
|||
Thomas A. Kroll
Vice President and Controller |
17
FORM 10-K - ITEM 15 (a) (1) AND (2) AND ITEM 15 (c)
CTS
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
The following consolidated financial statements of CTS Corporation and subsidiaries included in the 2004 Annual Report are referenced in Part II, Item 8, filed herewith as Exhibit (13) and incorporated herein by reference:
Consolidated statements of earnings (loss) - Years ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002 |
Consolidated balance sheets - December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
Consolidated statements of cash flows - Years ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002 |
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity - Years ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements |
Supplementary Financial Data: |
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) - Years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
Per Share Data (Unaudited) - Years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of CTS Corporation and subsidiaries is included in Item 15 (c):
Schedule II - Valuation and qualifying accounts / Page S-3 |
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. |
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting / Page S-4
S-1
We have completed an integrated audit of CTS Corporations 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CTS Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 3, 2005
S-2
CTS CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) |
Balance at
Beginning of Period |
Charged to
Expense |
Charged to
Other Accounts |
Deductions |
Balance at End of Period |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2004: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,585 | $ | | $ | | $ | (135 | ) | $ | 1,450 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2003: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables | $ | 1,694 | $ | 396 | $ | | $ | (505 | ) | $ | 1,585 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful receivables | $ | 1,470 | $ | 228 | $ | | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 1,694 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
CTS management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including CTS principal executive officer and principal financial officer, CTS conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on CTS evaluation under the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework, management concluded that CTS internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. Managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
CTS Corporation
Elkhart, IN
March 3, 2005
/s/ Donald K. Schwanz | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani | |||
|
|
|||
Donald K. Schwanz
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Vinod M. Khilnani
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
S-4
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
The third paragraph of Section 2 of the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-employee Directors (the Plan) shall be amended to read as follows:
On the second Tuesday in January 2004, the Company shall credit 800 Common Stock Units to the Deferred Stock Account of each person who is a non-employee director of the Company on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar year or who ceased to be a director during the immediately preceding calendar year by reason of his retirement, disability or death, provided however that if CTS common stock is not traded on the New York Stock Exchange on the second Tuesday in January, Common Stock Units shall be credited on the next preceding day on which CTS common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the Credit Date). If the value of 800 Common Stock Units exceeds $30,000 by more than 10%, (calculated by multiplying the number of units times the closing price of CTS common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Credit Date), the number of units granted on the Credit Date will be reduced as necessary to bring the value to an amount approximately equal to $30,000, without using fractional units.
The following shall be added as the fourth paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan:
No Common Stock Units shall be credited to any directors Deferred Stock Account for services performed after December 31, 2003.
The following shall be added as the second paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan:
No Common Stock Units shall be credited to any directors Deferred Stock Account as dividend equivalents for dividend payments made by the Company after December 31, 2003. The value of any fractional Common Stock Units carried forward pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall credited to each directors Deferred Stock Account and distributed as provided under Section 4.
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
Effective June 1, 2004, Section 3.01 of the 2003 Excess Benefit Retirement Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:
3.01 | Amount of Benefit . The amount of the Benefit which a Member (or Beneficiary, if applicable) is eligible to receive under this Plan shall be equal to the excess of (a) over (b): |
(a) | The amount of benefit which such Member would be entitled to receive under the Pension Plan, if |
(i) | the definition of Pay used in determining the Members benefit under the Pension Plan included 50% of the Fair Market Value of Shares due to the Member (prior to withholding) in settlement of Restricted Stock Units which were awarded under the CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, determined as of the applicable vesting date of such Restricted Stock Units; |
(ii) | the percentage of Compensation (as defined in the Pension Plan) used in determining the Members benefit under the applicable provision of Section 6 of the Pension Plan was, |
1.25% if the date of determination occurs during the Members first year of participation in this Plan; |
1.35% if the date of determination occurs during the Members second year of participation in this Plan; |
1.45% if the date of determination occurs during the Members third year of participation in this Plan; |
1.55% if the date of determination occurs during the Members fourth year of participation in this Plan; |
1.65% if the date of determination occurs during the Members fifth year of participation in this Plan; |
1.75% if the date of determination occurs during any subsequent year of participation in this Plan; and |
(iii) | such benefit were computed without giving effect to the limitations then currently imposed by Code Section 401(a)(17) and Code Section 415(b) and regulations thereunder and without regard to the benefit accrual determined under Section 6.13 of the Pension Plan. For purposes of this Section 3.01, a Members date of participation in this Plan shall be the later of July 1, 2003, or the effective date that the Member is first eligible to participate in the Plan in accordance with Article V. A Members years of participation will begin on the Members date of participation and each subsequent anniversary thereof. |
(b) | The amount of benefit which such Member actually receives under the Pension Plan. |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the ____ day of __________, 200_ (the "Grant Date") between CTS CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation (the "Company"), and ________ (the "Grantee").
1. | Grant . Subject to the terms set forth in this Agreement and in the Companys 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan), the Company hereby grants to the Grantee _________ Restricted Stock Units. This grant is made to the Grantee in consideration for services to be performed by Grantee for the Company as a non-employee director in the 200_ calendar year. In the event, that the Grantee is not a non-employee director of the Company as of January 1, 200_, this grant shall be forfeited in its entirety. Termination of services by the Grantee during the 200_ calendar year shall not affect this grant except as expressly provided herein. Except as expressly provided herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms under the Plan. |
It is intended that this Agreement and its administration comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code. Accordingly, notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement or in the Plan to the contrary, this Agreement and the Plan will be interpreted and applied so that the Agreement does not fail to meet, and is operated in accordance with, the requirements of paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of Section 409A(a) of the Code. As used herein, Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended from time to time, and any interpretations thereof issued by the U.S. Treasury Department on which the Company is permitted to rely. |
2. | Settlement of Restricted Stock Units . Each Restricted Stock Unit shall entitle the Grantee to one Share which shall be distributed to the Grantee (or to the estate, guardian or beneficiary of the Grantee, as the case may be) on the Settlement Date(s) as defined herein. The Settlement Date(s) shall be the date(s) specified by the Grantee in the Settlement Date Election Form attached hereto as Exhibit A. In the event that the Grantee does not complete and return a Settlement Date Election Form to the Company on or before December 31, 200_, _____________ shall be deemed to be the Settlement Date for all Restricted Stock Units awarded under this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement or the Settlement Date Election Form, upon the first to occur of the following events, Shares shall be distributed in the settlement of Restricted Stock Units as soon as reasonably practicable, and such date(s) of distribution shall be deemed to be the Settlement Date(s); |
(a) | Grantees separation from service as defined by Section 409A of the Code; provided, however that if Grantee is or becomes a specified employee as defined by Section 409A of the Code, such date shall be delayed by six months; |
(b) | Grantees becoming disabled, as defined by Section 409A of the Code; |
(c) | Grantees death; |
(d) | To the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, a change in ownership or effective control of the Company; or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company; or |
(e) | Grantees unforeseeable emergency, as defined and not in excess of the amount permitted by Section 409A of the Code; |
The Companys obligations to the Grantee with respect to the Restricted Stock Units will be satisfied in full upon the distribution of Shares corresponding to such Restricted Stock Units. On the Settlement Date(s), the Company may, at its election, either (i) deliver to the Grantee a certificate representing the number of Shares to be distributed to the Grantee as of that Settlement Date; (ii) credit the number of Shares to be distributed to the Grantee as of that Settlement Date to a book-entry account in the name of the Grantee held by the Companys transfer agent; or (iii) credit the number of Shares to be distributed to the Grantee as of that Settlement Date to a brokerage account designated by the Grantee. In no event may any Settlement Date be accelerated except in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. |
1
3. | Selection of Settlement Dates . The Grantees selection of a Settlement Date may have important tax consequences. The Grantee is advised to consult an independent tax professional before making this selection. |
The Grantee may elect to defer a Settlement Date which is a specific calendar date previously selected by the Grantee (the Original Settlement Date) on a form provided by the Company and pursuant to procedures established by the Company from time to time. Any such election may be made for less than all of the Shares due to be distributed on a Settlement Date, and different elections may be made with respect to Shares to be distributed on a Settlement Date. The Grantees election to defer an Original Settlement Date must be made at least twelve (12) months in advance of the Original Settlement Date and must defer distribution for a period of at least five (5) years after the Original Settlement Date. No election to defer an Original Settlement Date shall be effective for at least twelve (12) months after such election has been made. If the Grantee has selected separation from service as a Settlement Date that Settlement Date may not be deferred. |
4. | Taxes . The Grantee shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes, including without limitation, any income or employment taxes, which are due or may become due as a result of this grant or the distribution of Shares. |
5. | Rights Not Conferred . The Grantee shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Stock Units, including the right to receive dividends or vote stock, until such time, if any, that Shares are distributed to the Grantee in settlement thereof. The Grantee is further advised that until distribution, the Companys obligation will be merely that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of the Company to deliver Shares in the future, and the rights of the Grantee will be no greater than that of an unsecured general creditor. No assets of the Company will be held as collateral security for the obligations of the Company hereunder, and all assets of the Company will be subject to the claims of the Companys creditors. |
6. | Agreement Not Assignable . This Agreement and the Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder are not transferable or assignable by the Grantee; provided that no provision herein shall prevent the transfer of such Restricted Stock Units or the Shares related thereto by will or by the laws of descent or distribution in the event of the Grantees death. |
7. | Adjustments . If and to the extent that the number of Shares shall be increased or reduced in the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, or similar corporate transaction, the number and kinds of shares subject to the Restricted Stock Units awarded hereunder may be adjusted by the Committee, in its sole discretion. In the event of any such transaction, the Committee may provide in substitution for the Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder such alternative consideration as it may determine to be equitable. |
8. | Governing Law . This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Indiana. |
9. | Amendments. Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however , that no amendment to the Plan or the Agreement shall adversely affect the value or number of the Grantees Restricted Stock Units without the Grantees written consent, except to the extent necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code. |
10. | Administration. The Committee shall have the power to interpret the Plan and this Agreement and to adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation, and application of the Plan as are consistent therewith and to interpret or revoke any such rules. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the Grantee, the Company and all other interested persons. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made in good faith with respect to the Plan or this Agreement. |
11. | Severability . If any provision of the Plan or this Agreement is, becomes, or is deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or would disqualify the Plan or award hereunder under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the purpose or intent of the Plan or award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction or award, and the remainder of the Plan or Agreement shall be in full force and effect. |
2
12. | Construction . The Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder are being issued pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan (Restricted Stock Award) and are subject to the terms of the Plan. A copy of the Plan has been given to the Grantee, and additional copies of the Plan are available upon request during normal business hours at the principal executive offices of the Company. To the extent that any provision of this Agreement violates or is inconsistent with an express provision of the Plan, the Plan provision shall govern and any inconsistent provision in this Agreement shall be of no force or effect. |
13. | Binding Effect . This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators and successors of the parties hereto. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.
_________________________
Director
CTS CORPORATION
By:
_________________________
Richard G. Cutter
III
Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
3
EXHIBIT A
CTS CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD
SETTLEMENT DATE
ELECTION FORM
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO THE COMPANY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 200_. IF YOU FAIL TO RETURN THIS FORM TO THE COMPANY BY THAT DATE, YOUR AWARD WILL BE DISTRIBUTED ON _______________.
Name:
Address:
Date of Award:
Instructions:
You were awarded Restricted Stock Units under the CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan). Each Restricted Stock Unit entitles you to a share of CTS Common Stock on the Settlement Date you select, subject to the terms of the Plan and your Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Your Settlement Date may not be earlier than _________________. Please select one of the following three alternatives:
1. | You may elect to receive a distribution of all Restricted Stock Units granted under this award upon your separation from service by initialing the following statement: |
_____ | I hereby elect to receive a distribution of all of the Shares to which I am entitled under this award upon my separation from service as defined by Section 409A of the Code, provided however that if I am or become a specified employee as defined by Section 409A of the Code, such date shall be delayed by six months (the Settlement Date). |
Note: You may not make a subsequent deferral of this Settlement Date.
2. | You may elect to receive a distribution of all Restricted Stock Units granted under this award on a specific calendar date by initialing and completing the following statement: |
_____ | I hereby elect to receive a distribution of all of the Shares to which I am entitled under this award on _______________ ___, 20____ (the Settlement Date). |
3. | You may elect to receive a distribution of Restricted Stock Units in installments on a fixed schedule of calendar dates by initialing and completing the following statement: |
_____ | I hereby elect to have installments of the Shares to which I am entitled under this Award distributed to me on the dates specified below: |
No. of Shares _____ _______________ ___, 20____ ("Settlement Date") |
No. of Shares _____ _______________ ___, 20____ ("Settlement Date") |
No. of Shares _____ _______________ ___, 20____ ("Settlement Date") |
No. of Shares _____ _______________ ___, 20____ ("Settlement Date") |
No. of Shares _____ _______________ ___, 20____ ("Settlement Date") |
Acknowledgment:
I hereby acknowledge that, (i) I have been provided copies of the Plan and the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, (ii) this election shall be subject to the terms of the Plan and the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, and (iii) I have been advised to consult an independent tax advisor regarding the effects of this election. I understand that (i) the Companys obligation is merely that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of the Company to deliver shares of CTS Common Stock in the future, (ii) no assets of the Company will be held as collateral security for this obligation, and (iii) my rights will be no greater than those of a general unsecured creditor. I acknowledge that I will be responsible for the payment of any income and employment taxes due on this award.
___________________________________ | _________________________ | |
Director | Date |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
Director Compensation
Employee directors receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors or Board Committees. Non-employee directors receive the following fees for their service on the Board: annual board retainer $24,000; annual retainer for each Audit Committee member $4,000; annual retainer for each Finance, Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committee Member $2,500; additional annual retainer for Audit Committee Chairman $4,000; additional annual retainer for Compensation Committee Chairman $3,000; additional annual retainer for Finance and Nominating and Governance Chairman $2,000; meeting fee for each Board or Committee Meeting $1,500. Effective in 2003, the Board adopted a policy providing that all committee meetings, including special meetings called by the committee chairman, are compensated at the regular meeting fee rate. Special activity by the committee chairman, as well as any special activity by another committee member that is requested or approved by the committee chairman, is also compensated at the regular meeting fee rate. Non-employee directors are reimbursed by the corporation for reasonable travel expenses related to their performance of services and for director education programs.
In 1990, CTS adopted the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Under that plan, a deferred stock unit account was established for each non-employee director. Through January 2004, 800 common stock units and additional units representing dividends on CTS common stock paid were credited annually to each non-employee directors account. When a non-employee director retires from the Board, he or she receives one share of CTS common stock for each deferred stock unit credited to his or her account. On December 1, 2004, the Board of Directors amended the plan to preclude crediting any additional units to the deferred stock unit accounts. On December 1, 2004, each non-employee director received a grant of restricted stock units under the CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan equivalent to the number of deferred stock units which would have been credited to the director for 2004 service under the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Under the terms of this award, each non-employee director will receive one share of CTS common stock for each restricted stock unit upon retirement from the Board.
In 2002, the Board established a $30,000 annual stock-based compensation target for each non-employee director. Through 2004, this target was achieved by calculating the value of the 800 common stock units to be credited under the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors based on the closing price of CTS common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the credit date. If the calculated value of the common stock units was less than $30,000, each non-employee director received a stock option award sufficient to make up the difference between that value and $30,000, based on the closing price of CTS common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the credit date. For 2005, the stock-based compensation target was achieved by awarding each non-employee director 2300 restricted stock units under the CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan. The awards were granted on December 1, 2004 and became distributable on January 11, 2005 absent a deferral election by the non-employee director. Upon distribution, one share of CTS common stock for each restricted stock unit is transferred to the non-employee director. A prototype non-employee director restricted stock unit agreement is filed as an Exhibit (10)(z) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
Named Executive Officer Compensation
CTS has an employment agreement with Donald K. Schwanz which has been previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to the corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K. CTS does not have written employment agreements with any other named executive officer. Annual salary for each named executive officer is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The annual salaries for named executive officers set in 2004 were as follows: Donald K. Schwanz $713,600; Vinod M. Khilnani $314,800; Donald R. Schroeder $289,500; James L. Cummins $224,800; Richard G. Cutter $220,500.
Each named executive officer participates in the CTS Corporation Management Incentive Plan which has been previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to CTS Annual Report on Form 10-K. The plan provides cash bonuses determined by the Compensation Committee, based on achievement of annual performance goals established by the Committee.
The Compensation Committee has historically awarded stock-based compensation to named executive officers on an annual basis. In 2004, the Compensation Committee awarded the named executive officers restricted stock units and incentive stock options under the CTS Corporation 2004 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan. Prototype restricted stock unit and incentive stock unit agreements were previously filed with the commission as an exhibit to the corporations quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004.
Mr. Schwanz receives a quarterly perquisite allowance of $3,900. Each other named executive officer receives a quarterly perquisite allowance of $3,600. Mr. Schroeder will receive an additional $4,000 per month cost-of-living allowance related to his relocation to Southern California as a result of his appointment as President of CTS Electronics Manufacturing Solutions, a strategic business unit of the corporation, during his first thirty-six months in this position.
Each named executive officer has executed a change-in-control severance agreement which provides severance benefits only upon a change-in-control of CTS. Prototype change-in-control severance agreements have been previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to the corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
Overview
CTS is a global manufacturer and supplier of components and sensors to the automotive, communications, and computer markets. The Company also manufactures and designs specialized electronic products for industrial, communications, and computing infrastructure OEMs. Sales and marketing is accomplished through CTS sales engineers, independent manufacturers representatives, and distributors. Total sales in 2004 of $531.3 million were reported through two business segments, Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) and Components and Sensors, which represented 50.9% and 49.1% of CTS total sales in 2004, respectively.
In 2004, the Company experienced a strong year-over-year sales increase and improved net earnings significantly from 2003. During this period, the Company continued to focus on three key priorities: (1) improving profitability concurrently with growing sales; (2) strengthening the balance sheet; and (3) developing new sources of revenue to drive future growth. During 2004, CTS continued to see growth in certain of its existing served markets, as well as new business awards from existing and new customers. Additionally, CTS continued to report progress in growth initiatives, especially new automotive platform positions and precision frequency products for the communications infrastructure market.
As discussed in more detail throughout the MD&A:
| CTS revenues increased 14.8% during 2004 compared to 2003, following 1% sales growth in 2003 compared to 2002. Most of the increase came in the EMS segment, which was up 28.7% compared to 2003, while the Components and Sensors segment experienced 3.2% growth. |
| Gross margins in 2004 increased $13.0 million from 2003, primarily due to sales growth. |
| The Company continued to leverage selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses and reduced them to 15.5% of sales in 2004 from 16.9% in 2003 and 19.1% in 2002. |
| The operating earnings of $31.1 million in 2004 included $3.9 million of gain on asset sales. In 2003, operating earnings of $13.8 million included a $4.6 million asset impairment charge. |
| Net earnings of $20.0 million in 2004 substantially exceeded net earnings of $12.6 million in 2003. |
| Diluted earnings per share of $0.53 in 2004 increased $0.17 from diluted earnings per share of $0.36 in 2003. |
| Cash and cash equivalent balances were $61.0 million at the end of 2004, compared to $25.3 million in 2003. |
| Total debt balances were $97.5 million at the end of 2004, versus $75.9 million in 2003, and $95.4 million in 2002. Interest expense decreased over the last two years, benefiting from the lower interest rate and lower average debt balances. Interest expense was $5.5 million in 2004, $7.7 million in 2003, and $10.2 million in 2002. |
Acquisition
On November 16, 2004, CTS entered into a merger agreement with SMTEK International, Inc. The agreement was approved by SMTEK shareholders on January 31, 2005. SMTEK is a publicly traded company in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry with sales of $102.4 million and operating earnings of $4.0 million in the reported 12month period ended September 30, 2004. With operations on both the east and west coasts of the United States, and in southeast Asia, SMTEK serves over 25 major customers in the medical, industrial and security, aerospace and defense, and communications markets. The estimated aggregate purchase price is approximately $60 million, consisting of $35 million cash consideration, $13 million of SMTEK debt assumed by CTS, approximately 812,000 shares of CTS common stock valued at $10 million, and $2 million of estimated transaction costs.
1
Benefits of the acquisition include:
| Accelerated expansion into new markets: SMTEK primarily serves medical, industrial and security, aerospace and defense, and communications markets. CTS largest EMS markets are in computing and communications. |
| Reduced customer concentration: SMTEK brings a variety of new large accounts that will significantly broaden CTS EMS customer base. |
| Enhanced operational capabilities: SMTEK is a leader in printed circuit board design, assembly and testing for complex electronic products and has key process and agreement certifications in medical and aerospace. |
| Increased global footprint: SMTEK has strong operational capabilities on the east coast and west coast, and in Thailand. CTS has EMS operations on the east coast, in Europe, China and Singapore. |
Outlook
Including the impact of SMTEK, CTS expects 2005 full year sales to grow by 30-35%, and diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $0.65 - $0.72. The earnings per share guidance includes a negative impact of approximately $0.05 per share from adopting the new accounting rule on contingently convertible debentures. The Company expects the SMTEK acquisition to be accretive by $0.04-$0.06 per share in 2005.
Critical Accounting Policies
CTS managements discussion and analysis is based on its consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. CTS evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis, based on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be relevant under the circumstances. Actual results may differ, perhaps materially, from the estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
CTS served markets are characterized by rapid technological change and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. These characteristics, along with global economic conditions, are risks that require management judgment when determining appropriate accounting decisions. Management believes that judgment and estimates related to the following critical accounting policies could materially affect its consolidated financial statements:
Estimating inventory valuation, the allowance for doubtful accounts and other accrued liabilities
CTS management makes estimates of the carrying value of its inventory based upon historical usage, new product introductions and projected customer purchase levels. The ever-changing technology environment of the served markets affects these estimates. Similarly, management makes estimates of the collectability of its accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Finally, CTS is involved in litigation in the normal course of business and is regulated under a number of environmental and safety laws. Accruals for known exposures are established based on managements best estimate after considering the advice of legal counsel.
Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and depreciation/amortization periods
CTS assesses the carrying value of long-lived and intangible assets and the remaining useful lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or the estimated useful life may no longer be appropriate. Factors considered important which could trigger this review include significant decreases in operating results, significant changes in its use of the assets, competitive factors and the strategy of its business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. The Company cannot predict the occurrence of future impairment-triggering events nor the impact such events might have on the reported asset values. Such events may include strategic decisions made in response to the economic conditions relative to product lines, operations and the impact of the economic environment on our customer base.
When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived and intangible assets may not be recoverable based on an assessment of future undiscounted cash flows from the use of those assets, an impairment charge to record the assets at fair value may be recorded. Impairment is measured based on fair values utilizing estimated discounted cash flows, published third-party sources, third-party offers and information furnished by third-party brokers/dealers.
2
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and carryforwards using currently enacted tax rates. CTS must also estimate its current tax exposure for situations where taxing authorities would assert tax positions different than those taken by the Company. Such reserves are routinely reviewed and adjusted when required to reflect changes in estimates based on factors such as changes in tax laws, results of tax authority reviews and statutory limitations. CTS estimates its income tax valuation allowance by assessing which deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be recovered in the future. The valuation allowance is based on CTS estimates of taxable income in each jurisdiction in which it operates and the period over which the deferred tax assets will be recoverable.
CTS believes it will more likely than not realize the benefits of its $54.4 million U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, which expire in 2021 through 2024. The Company assessed the future realization of these deferred tax assets utilizing taxable income projections for years 2005 through 2013. The projections were based on taxable income estimates consistent with historical earnings patterns of its traditional automotive and electronic component product lines and a return to levels of profitability in its communications components product lines consistent with management and independent consensus views of the moderate recovery expected in the markets served by CTS. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates in future periods, CTS may need to establish an additional valuation allowance or reduce the valuation allowance, which could materially impact the results of operations and financial position.
The annual effective income tax rate is based on CTS current legal organization and forecasted earnings in the various taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Changes in CTS legal organization, the amount or the location of global earnings could impact its future effective income tax rate. In 2004, CTSs effective tax rate decreased from 25% to 23% primarily as a result of increased profits being reported in lower taxed jurisdictions.
Retirement Plans
Actuarial assumptions are used in determining pension income and expense and the pension benefit obligation. CTS, after considering the recommendations of its actuaries, assumes a discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets and a rate of compensation increase in determining its annual pension income and expense and the projected benefit obligation. Experience gains/losses arising from any variance between the expected rate of return of plan assets and the actual results are amortized over periods ranging from 5 to 16 years. During the fourth quarter of each year, CTS reviews its actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted. Changes in the actuarial assumptions could have a material affect on CTS results of operations in future years.
For 2004, CTS had a weighted-average discount rate of 6.17% for pension income and expense. CTS reduced the discount rate assumption for 2005 to reflect the interest rate decline on high-quality corporate bonds. The Company reduced the discount rate on its domestic plans from 6.25% at January 1, 2004 to 6.0% at January 1, 2005. The range of discount rates utilized by its foreign plans was also increased from 3.5% - 5.4% in 2004 to 3.5% - 5.6% in 2005.
The Company also revised its long-term expected return on plan asset assumption as a result of its evaluation of long-term returns. The expected return on domestic plan assets at January 1, 2005 was lowered to 8.50% from 8.75% and the range of expected returns on foreign plan assets stayed the same, at 3.50% - 7.00%.
CTS expects these changes in actuarial assumptions, combined with the pension asset balance at the end of 2004, will reduce 2005 consolidated pension income by approximately $3 - $4 million.
3
Results of Operations
Business Segment Discussion
CTS has two reportable business segments: 1) Components and Sensors and 2) Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS).
Components and sensors are products which perform specific electronic functions for a given product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Components and sensors consist principally of: automotive sensors and actuators used in commercial or consumer vehicles; electronic components used in cellular handsets, communications infrastructure, and computer markets; low temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) used in various communications, military, aerospace, and automotive applications; terminators, including ClearONE terminators, used in computer and other high speed applications, switches, resistor networks; and potentiometers used to serve multiple markets.
EMS includes the higher level assembly of electronic and mechanical components into a finished subassembly or assembly, such as printed circuit board assembly, performed under a contract manufacturing agreement with an OEM or other contract manufacturer. EMS also includes the design of interconnect systems and complex backplanes as may be required by the customer.
For additional information on business segments, refer to "Note M - Business Segments."
The following table summarizes net sales and operating earnings by business segment:
Components | ||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | & Sensors | EMS | Total | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2004
|
||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers
|
$ | 260,982 | $ | 270,334 | $ | 531,316 | ||||||
Segment operating earnings
|
23,311 | (1) | 7,817 | 31,128 | ||||||||
% of segment sales
|
8.9 | % | 2.9 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers
|
$ | 252,911 | $ | 210,076 | $ | 462,987 | ||||||
Segment operating earnings
|
7,394 | 10,985 | 18,379 | |||||||||
% of segment sales
|
2.9 | % | 5.2 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
2002
|
||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers
|
$ | 270,919 | $ | 186,885 | $ | 457,804 | ||||||
Segment operating earnings (loss)
|
(5,927 | ) | 10,790 | 4,863 | ||||||||
% of segment sales
|
(2.2 | )% | 5.8 | % | 1.1 | % |
(1) | Includes $3.9 million of gain on asset sales. |
4
The 2004 Components and Sensors business segment sales increased $8.1 million, or 3.2%, from 2003. The increase was primarily due to increased demand for the automotive sensor products, communication infrastructure products and favorable foreign exchange, due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British Pound and the Euro. Despite a small sales increase, segment operating earnings more than tripled from the prior year, primarily due to favorable impact from the contribution of incremental sales and product mix of approximately $3.8 million. Lower depreciation expenses of $7.9 million, due to a lower level of capital expenditures in recent years versus high levels of capital expenditures in the preceding years, and an intersegment cost allocation to EMS Singapore operation of $1.7 million also helped to improve segment operating earnings in 2004. The segment operating earnings also included $3.9 million of gain on asset sales, including $2.7 million gain from sale of excess land in Canada, and a favorable impact of foreign exchange rate movements. Research and development expenses decreased $2.7 million in 2004 compared to 2003, as a result of streamlining research and development activities. These favorable factors were partially offset by product launch costs of $2.8 million and higher operating expenses of $4.9 million related to incentive compensation and professional services.
Components and Sensors 2003 business segment sales decreased $18.0 million, or 6.7%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of end-of-life product sales of $16.2 million and continuing softness in the communications market. End-of-life product sales represent the final shipments of products that have been replaced by newer technologies or no longer meet the Companys profit objectives and the decision is made by the company to cease manufacturing. Sales into the automotive market increased slightly in 2003, benefited by the introduction of new product and sales into Asia. Despite the overall sales decrease, segment operating earnings improved $13.3 million primarily from $10.1 million of lower depreciation and amortization expense and reduced operating expenses of $11.9 million mainly in wages and related benefits. These improvements were partially reduced by the impact of lower volume of approximately $4.6 million and $4.1 million of favorable items occurring in 2002, primarily related to a $3.1 million customer reimbursement.
EMS 2004 business segment sales increased $60.2 million, or 28.7%, from the prior year. The revenue increase was primarily due to $24.9 million increase in data storage systems, $20.8 million increase in communications infrastructure systems and $9.3 million increase in networking equipment from both existing customers and new customers. The operating earnings of $7.8 million decreased $3.2 million from the prior year. The decrease in earnings was primarily driven by price reductions in connection with the product transfer to Singapore and an unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rate movements. These price reductions were partially offset by cost reductions. CTS anticipates additional cost reductions after a full year of EMS Singapore operations. Also, EMS incurred an intersegment cost allocation of $1.7 million from the Components and Sensors segment. Additionally, in 2004, some start-up costs were incurred to support the new operation in Singapore. These unfavorable factors were partially offset by the favorable impact of $6.9 million from higher sales and product mix.
CTS earnings are subject to fluctuations of foreign currency exchange rates. For 2004, the impact of foreign exchange rates was positive on Components and Sensors segment operating earnings, while negative on EMS segment operating earnings, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro and British Pound. To a large extent, the unfavorable impact was offset by the favorable impact.
EMS business segment sales increased $23.2 million, or 12.4%, in 2003 from the prior year. Sales into the communications market increased, due primarily to stronger shipments of infrastructure products into China and Europe. Additionally, shipments of computer products increased in 2003, following a decline in the prior year. Segment operating earnings of $11.0 million increased $0.2 million from the prior year primarily from favorable volume impacts, partially offset by product mix, of $1.2 million, and $1.0 million of higher general and administrative and selling and marketing expenses.
5
Sales in Geographic Regions
CTS has continued its expansion into the Asia-Pacific markets. Geographically, sales into the Asia-Pacific region are now 36% of CTS total net sales versus 29% in 2003. Sales in Europe and the Americas decreased to 19% from 23% of total net sales and 45% from 48% of total net sales, respectively. The following table presents the percentage of net sales into each geographic region within each segment and consolidated:
Components & Sensors | EMS | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographic Region | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas
|
56 | % | 55 | % | 56 | % | 34 | % | 41 | % | 45 | % | 45 | % | 48 | % | 52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Europe
|
17 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | 20 | % | 32 | % | 35 | % | 19 | % | 23 | % | 24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Asia-Pacific
|
27 | % | 30 | % | 27 | % | 46 | % | 27 | % | 20 | % | 36 | % | 29 | % | 24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion - Most Recent Three Years
The following table highlights significant information from CTS consolidated results of operations during the past three years:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(In thousands of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 531,316 | $ | 462,987 | $ | 457,804 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
421,560 | 366,275 | 366,775 | 1 | ||||||||
Gross margin
|
109,756 | 96,712 | 91,029 | |||||||||
% of net sales
|
20.7 | % | 20.9 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
63,485 | 56,857 | 63,337 | |||||||||
% of net sales
|
11.9 | % | 12.3 | % | 13.8 | % | ||||||
Research and development expenses
|
19,063 | 21,476 | 24,118 | |||||||||
% of net sales
|
3.6 | % | 4.6 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Gain on asset sales
|
(3,920 | ) | | | ||||||||
Restructuring and impairment charges
|
| 4,563 | 18,343 | |||||||||
Operating earnings (loss)
|
31,128 | 13,816 | (14,769 | ) | ||||||||
% of net sales
|
5.9 | % | 3.0 | % | (3.2 | )% | ||||||
Interest expense
|
5,535 | 7,688 | 10,240 | |||||||||
Other income
|
324 | 120 | 1,209 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
25,917 | 6,248 | (23,800 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
5,961 | (6,327 | ) 2 | (5,950 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 19,956 | $ | 12,575 | $ | (17,850 | ) | |||||
% of net sales
|
3.8 | % | 2.7 | % | (3.9 | )% |
(1) | Cost of goods sold includes restructuring-related charges consisting primarily of inventory write downs, equipment relocations and other employee-related costs of $1.3 million in 2002. |
(2) | Includes a $7.9 million benefit resulting from the reversal of reserves that were no longer required following the expiration of statutory deadlines. |
6
Net sales increased $68.3 million in 2004, or 14.8%, from prior year, primarily due to the EMS increase of $60.2 million related to increased demand for communications infrastructure systems, networking equipment, and data storage systems. In addition, Components and Sensors sales increased $8.1 million, primarily related to increased demand for automotive products, and communications infrastructure components.
The 2003 net sales increased $5.2 million, or 1%, from 2002. This increase was primarily due to higher EMS product sales of $23.2 million, partially offset by an $18.0 million decrease in Components and Sensors product sales. The improved sales volume in the EMS business segment was driven by growth in shipments of communication products primarily in infrastructure end markets in China. The decreased sales volume in the Components and Sensors business segment principally reflects the decision to end-of-life certain products in the third quarter of 2002.
The Companys 15 largest customers represented 69% of net sales in 2004. This is a slight decrease from 71% and 73% in 2003 and 2002, respectively. This percentage is decreasing as the Company continues efforts to broaden its business base, particularly in automotive and wireless infrastructure product offerings. Sales to Hewlett-Packard Company represented 33% of net sales in 2004, 2003, and 2002. Sales to Motorola, Inc. were 13% of net sales in 2004 and 2003, and 12% in 2002.
CTS products are usually priced with consideration to
expected or required profit margins, customer expectations, and market
competition. Pricing for most of CTS Components and Sensors and EMS
products generally decrease over time and also fluctuate in accordance with
total industry utilization of manufacturing capacity. In both CTS segments,
nominal annual price reductions are in the single-digit range, which is typical
of the industry. CTS continues to work on cost reduction to offset the negative
price impact on profit margin.
Gross margin increased $13.0 million, or 13.5%, in 2004 from 2003, primarily due to higher sales of $68.3 million and lower depreciation expense, as mentioned in the Business Segment Discussion. However, gross margin as a percentage of sales declined because of the higher percent of EMS segment sales, which inherently have a lower gross margin percentage than Components and Sensors segment sales.
Gross margin in 2003 increased $5.7 million, or 1.0 percentage point, over 2002, to 20.9%, on improved sales of $5.2 million. Items contributing to the gross margin percentage increase included $6.2 million of lower depreciation expense, $6.0 million from favorable product mix and volumerelated improvements, partially offset by $3.7 million in lower pension income. The 2002 gross margin also included a favorable adjustment of $3.1 million for a customer reimbursement and $1.3 million of restructuring related charges.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales decreased 0.4 percentage points to 11.9% in 2004 from prior year, as the Company was able to leverage existing resources with higher sales. The total dollar amount increased $6.6 million, primarily due to the increased expenses for incentive compensation, professional services, and normal cost of living adjustments.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $56.9 million, or 12.3% of net sales in 2003, versus $63.3 million, or 13.8% of net sales in 2002, reflecting Company initiatives to control costs and scale operations to existing market conditions. Cost reductions were achieved primarily in salaries and wages and lower depreciation and amortization expenses.
Research and development expenses were $19.1 million in 2004 versus $21.5 million in 2003 and $24.1 million in 2002. The reductions in research and development spending reflect savings due to organizational consolidation, changing business mix, and the streamlining of research and development activities. Significant ongoing research and development activities continue in the Components and Sensors business segment, particularly for automotive products in support of growth initiatives. CTS research and development investment is primarily focused on expanded applications and new product development, as well as current product and process enhancements. Research and development expenditures in the EMS business segment are typically very low.
Operating earnings in 2004 increased to $31.1 million, or 5.9% of sales, from $13.8 million, or 3.0% of sales, in 2003. Favorable changes contributing to the margin improvement were gross margin increase and gain on asset sales offset by increase of operating expenses, as discussed above. Operating earnings in 2004 included gain on asset sales of $3.9 million. As discussed in the Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges section below, operating earnings in 2003 included an asset impairment charge of $4.6 million.
Operating earnings in 2003 of $13.8 million improved $28.6 million over 2002. Favorable changes to operating earnings resulted from gross margin improvement and a reduction in operating expenses. In addition, 2003 included a $4.6 million asset impairment charge, while 2002 included $19.6 million of restructuring, asset impairment and restructuring-related one-time charges, and $4.1 million of favorable items which include a $3.1 million customer reimbursement.
7
Interest expense in 2004 was $5.5 million, or 28.0% lower than 2003. This was primarily due to payment in whole of CTS industrial revenue bonds, which carried a coupon rate of 7.5%. Cash from operation and proceeds from the convertible senior subordinated debentures issued in May 2004, as discussed in the Liquidity section, which bear an annual interest rate of 2.125%, financed the payment of the industrial revenue bonds. Interest expense decreased $2.6 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to lower average outstanding debt balance.
In 2004, CTS changed its estimate of its 2004 effective tax rate from 25% to 23%. The lower effective tax rate reflects the transfer of certain business operations to jurisdictions with lower statutory tax rates and the notification that manufacturing incentives in one foreign jurisdiction qualified CTS for a lower statutory rate, expiring in 2012, subject to certain conditions.
During 2003, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $7.9 million resulting from the reversal of reserves that were no longer required following the expiration of statutory deadlines.
Net earnings in 2004 increased $7.4 million, or 58.7%, to $20.0 million in 2004 from $12.6 million in 2003. Net earnings in 2004 included the impact of $3.9 million pre-tax gain on asset sales. Net earnings in 2003 included the impact of a pre-tax $4.6 million asset impairment charge and a $7.9 million tax benefit.
Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges
During the third quarter of 2003, CTS recorded a $4.6 million pre-tax impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of certain assets, held by the Components and Sensors business segment, to their estimated fair value. Approximately $3.3 million of the impairment charge reflected a write down for electronic equipment following final production of previously announced end-of-life products and a re-assessment of the current market value for equipment held for sale. An additional $1.3 million of the impairment charge related to excess capacity on a production line following an assessment of future capacity needs. All restructuring-related reserve balances had been fully utilized at December 31, 2003.
In the third quarter of 2002, CTS recorded $18.3 million of pre-tax restructuring and impairment charges. The charges included $5.0 million restructuring charges, $12.5 million of asset impairments and $0.8 million of pension curtailment losses. The charges were incurred in order to effect operational improvements and related organizational realignments primarily in the Components and Sensors business segment, involving the relocation of certain manufacturing operations. CTS completed substantially all of these restructuring actions by the end of 2002. Also during 2002, CTS recorded in cost of sales $1.3 million of restructuring-related charges, consisting primarily of equipment relocation costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At December 31, 2004, cash and cash equivalents balance increased to $61.0 million, driven by improved net earnings and asset sales. The cash and cash equivalents balance was $25.3 million and $9.2 million in 2003 and 2002 respectively. Total debt net of cash and cash equivalents decreased to $36.5 million from $50.6 million and $86.2 million in 2003 and 2002 respectively. Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization was 24% at the end of 2004, compared with 21% and 27% in 2003 and 2002 respectively.
In 2004:
| CTS completed the sale of the Longtan, Taiwan facility, and received net cash proceeds of $16.4 million. CTS also completed the sale of excess land in Canada and received $2.1 million, with the remaining $0.6 million in a note receivable due May 2006. |
| In May, CTS issued $60.0 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible senior subordinated debentures ($60 million Debentures) due 2024. The net proceeds of $57.6 million were used to pay off the outstanding principal of industrial revenue bonds and reduce amounts outstanding under its credit agreement. |
| On October 12, 2004, CTS $55 million revolving credit agreement was expanded to $75 million and the term was extended from July 2006 to July 2007. |
At the end of 2004, working capital increased $32.1 million, compared with 2003 year end. The working capital increase was primarily driven by a $35.7 million increase in cash and cash equivalents, an increase in accounts receivable of $11.8 million due to higher sales in December 2004, and an increase in inventory of $10.8 million to support higher sales and new product launches. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in short-term deferred income taxes of $19.9 million, in part due to changes in timing differences related to inventory reserves and non-deductible accruals, an increase of accounts payable of $3.4 million associated with higher sales, and increase of notes payable of $3.3 million.
8
Free Cash Flow
The following table summarizes free cash flow for the Company:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(In millions of dollars) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net cash provided by operations
|
$ | 14.0 | $ | 25.7 | $ | 24.1 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
7.1 | (5.1 | ) | ( | 10.0 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Free cash flow
|
21.1 | $ | 20.6 | $ | 14.1 | |||||||
|
|
|
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure which CTS defines as net cash provided by operations plus net cash provided by (used in) investing activities. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is net cash provided by operations. Management believes that free cash flow provides useful information to investors regarding the Companys ability to generate cash from business operations that is available for internal growth, service of debt principal, dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions and other investments. Management uses free cash flow as one measure to monitor and evaluate the performance of the Company.
In 2004, net cash provided by operations was $14.0 million, after funding the working capital required for business growth. Net cash provided by operations in 2004 was $11.7 million lower than net cash provided by operations in 2003 due to higher earnings in 2004 that are more than offset by non-cash adjustments and negative working capital change. Increased working capital was required to support a higher level of sales in 2004. Net cash provided by investing activities was $7.1 million after $19.8 million proceeds from the sale of assets offset capital expenditures of $12.7 million.
In 2003, net cash provided by operations was $25.7 million after funding the working capital required for business growth. The capital expenditures of $9.0 million were partially offset by the proceeds of $4.1 million from the sale of assets, primarily temperature compensated crystal oscillator (TCXO) production assets. In 2002, net cash provided by operations was $24.1 million, and the cash used in investing activities was $10.0 million.
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operations were $14.0 million in 2004. Components of cash flows from operations include earnings of $20.0 million and depreciation and amortization of $26.1 million, partially offset by gains of $3.9 million on sales of assets. There were $22.6 million of unfavorable changes in accounts receivable and inventory to support a 14.8% annual increase in sales. This was partially offset by a $3.9 million increase in accounts payable. Also, the pension asset increase of $10.9 million was an unfavorable impact.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2003 was $25.7 million, as CTS net income of $12.6 million, adjusted for non-cash items, primarily depreciation and amortization, and restructuring and impairment charges provided $50.8 million. Working capital and other changes utilized cash totalling $25.1 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2002 was $24.1 million, as CTS net loss of $17.9 million, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, restructuring and impairment charges and deferred income taxes, provided $33.0 million. Favorable working capital was offset by other changes for a use of $8.9 million.
Investing Activities
Cash flows provided by investing activities totaled $7.1 million in 2004, including $16.4 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Longtan, Taiwan facility and $2.1 million from the sale of excess land in Canada, partially offset by $12.7 million of capital expenditures for normal, recurring asset replacements and new automotive products, including occupant classification system, pedal assemblies, and belt tension sensor programs.
9
The 2003 use of $5.1 million for investing activities consisted primarily of $9.0 million of capital expenditures, partially offset by $4.1 million of proceeds from the sale of assets, primarily assets held for sale. Included in capital expenditures is approximately $6.1 million primarily for new products and technologies. Spending for new products included belt tension sensor and pedal sensor programs for the automotive market.
The 2002 cash used in investing activities was $10.0 million. This consisted primarily of $12.8 million of capital expenditures for normal, recurring asset replacements and new products, including automotive belt tension sensor and ClearONE components and investments in cost reduction programs. During 2002, the Company sold assets held for sale of $1.6 million and other fixed assets for $1.3 million.
Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2004 were $12.7 million, consisting primarily of $57.6 million proceeds from the $60 million Debentures due 2024, $42.0 million repayment of the 7.5% industrial revenue bonds, $3.3 million from short-term notes payable, $2.0 million purchase of treasury stock, and $4.5 million in dividend payments.
In 2003, CTS net cash used by financing activities totaled $5.9 million, consisting primarily of net repayment of debt of $19.5 million and dividend payments of $4.1 million. These uses were partially offset by the net proceeds from the issuance of stock of $15.6 million and $2.5 million from proceeds of stock option exercises.
In 2002, CTS net cash used by financing activities totaled $19.7 million, consisting primarily of an increase in borrowings of $26.1 million, representing the issuance of $25 million in aggregate principal amount of five-year, 6.5% convertible subordinated debentures, and the issuance of common stock for $42.7 million. This was offset by the repayment of long-term obligations of $83.2 million, dividend payments of $3.9 million, and debt issue costs of $1.7 million.
Our cash balances are held in locations throughout the world, including substantial amounts held outside the United States. Undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries amounted to approximately $174 million at December 31, 2004. Pending consideration of The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, prior year earnings are intended to be invested indefinitely, and, accordingly, no provision has been made for non-U.S. withholding taxes. In the event all undistributed earnings were remitted, approximately $6 million of withholding tax would be imposed. On October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations, and currently, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret numerous provisions in the Act. As such, the Company is not yet in a position to decide on whether, and to what extent, it might repatriate foreign earnings that have not yet been remitted to the U.S. Based on the Companys analysis to date, however, it is reasonably possible that it may repatriate some amount between $45 million and $75 million, with a tax liability estimated between $4 million and $6 million. CTS expects to determine the amounts and sources of foreign earnings to be repatriated, if any, no later than the fourth quarter of 2005.
Capital Resources
In 2004, CTS refinanced its debt by paying in whole the Industrial Revenue Bonds with the proceeds from the issuance of $60 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures bearing a lower interest rate, in an effort to reduce interest expense. The following table shows the long-term borrowings and related average interest rates as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
December 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance
($) |
Average
interest rate (%) |
Balance
($) |
Average
interest rate (%) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||
$75 million revolving credit agreement | $ | 9.2 | 4.2 | % | $ | 8.9 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Industrial revenue bonds | | | 42.0 | 7.5 | ||||||||||||||
Convertible debentures due 2007 | 25.0 | 6.5 | 25.0 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||
Convertible debentures due 2024 | 60.0 | 2.1 | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total long-term debt | $ | 94.2 | 3.5 | % | $ | 75.9 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
10
On October 12, 2004, CTS amended its revolving credit agreement to expand the borrowing capacity from $55 million to $75 million. The amendment also extended the term of the revolving credit agreement by one year, to July 2007, and revised certain financial covenants. The outstanding balance under the revolving credit agreement at December 31, 2004 was $9.2 million. Any outstanding balance would be senior to CTS convertible debentures. The revolving credit agreement is collateralized by substantially all U.S. assets and a pledge of 65% of the capital stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Interest rates on the agreement fluctuate based upon LIBOR. The interest rate as of December 31, 2004 was 4.2% per annum. CTS pays a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit agreement. The commitment fee varies based on performance under certain financial covenants and was 0.375 percent per annum as of December 31, 2004. The revolving credit agreement requires, among other things, that CTS comply with a minimum fixed charge coverage, a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum tangible net worth covenants. As of December 31, 2004, CTS was in compliance with these covenants. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit agreement. Additionally, the revolving credit agreement limits the amounts allowed for dividends, capital expenditures and acquisitions.
On July 9, 2004, CTS Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to one million shares of CTS common stock during the next two years. Under this program, CTS purchased 183,000 shares at a total cost of $2.0 million in 2004. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate purposes.
In May 2004, CTS issued the $60 million Debentures due 2024. The debt is an unsecured senior subordinated obligation of CTS. The debentures bear interest at a rate of 2.125% per year and will be convertible, under certain circumstances, into CTS common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $15.00 per share, which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 66.6667 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the debentures. The conversion price represents a 36.24% premium over the closing price of CTS common stock on May 5, 2004. The offering was closed on May 11, 2004. With the proceeds, CTS repaid outstanding debt, including its industrial revenue bonds outstanding balance of $40 million due in 2013 at a weighted average interest rate of 7.5% and reduced the amount outstanding under its revolving credit agreement. The other $2 million of industrial revenue bonds was repaid in the first quarter of 2004 with the cash generated from operations. As of December 31, 2004, no conversion condition for the $60 million Debentures was met.
In April 2002, the Company issued $25 million in aggregate principal amount of five-year, 6.5% convertible subordinated debentures due 2007. These debentures are unsecured and convert into CTS common stock at a conversion price of $20.05 per share. At any time after the three-year anniversary of the issue date, the purchasers may accelerate the maturity of the debentures. CTS also has the right after such three-year anniversary and under certain circumstances, to force conversion of the debentures into common stock. CTS used the net proceeds from the offering to repay the outstanding term loans in full under its then-existing credit agreement, and the balance was applied to the former revolving credit agreement.
In November 2001, CTS Form S-3 registration statement registering two million shares of CTS common stock to be issued under CTS Direct Stock Purchase Plan was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of December 31, 2004, CTS could issue up to approximately 48,100 additional shares of common stock under this registration statement.
In December 1999, CTS shelf registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. CTS could initially offer up to $500.0 million in any combination of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock or warrants under the registration statement. During 2004, CTS did not issue any securities under this registration statement. As of December 31, 2004, CTS could offer up to $435.1 million of additional debt and/or equity securities under this registration statement.
11
Capital Requirements
The following table sets forth the impact that contractual obligations, as of December 31, 2004, are expected to have on the Company's liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Total | 2005 | 2006-2007 | 2008-2009 | 2010-beyond | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
(1)
|
$ | 120.0 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 39.2 | (2) | $ | 2.6 | $ | 75.3 | (3) | ||||||||
Operating leases
|
23.7 | 6.3 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Retirement obligations
|
16.0 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 7.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
$ | 159.7 | $ | 11.1 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 10.8 | $ | 87.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Including principal and coupon payments of the $25 million debentures issued in 2002, principal and coupon payments of $60 million Debentures issued in 2004, and principal payment of the revolving credit agreement. |
(2) | Including $25 million in debentures issued in 2002 and $9.2 million outstanding under the revolving credit agreement. For the $25 million debentures, the investors may accelerate the maturity of the debentures at any time after the three-year anniversary of the issue date. These debentures convert into CTS common stock at a conversion price of $20.05 per share. |
(3) | Debentures issued in May 2004. Investor may convert the debentures, under certain circumstances, at any time to CTS common stock. The conversion price is $15.00 per common share. |
Purchase obligations are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on CTS and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. CTS purchases direct materials, generally related to customer orders, for production occurring at its manufacturing facilities around the world. These goods are secured using purchase orders, either blanket or discrete. Purchase orders commit CTS to take delivery of the quantities ordered generally over a specified delivery schedule. CTS standard purchase order terms and conditions state that, should CTS cancel an order, CTS will reimburse its supplier only for the costs incurred at the time of cancellation. CTS purchase order cancellations generally occur due to order cancellation by a customer. If a customer cancels its order, CTS standard terms of sale provide for reimbursement of costs, including those related to CTS purchase orders. Therefore, these commitments are not included in purchase obligations.
Retirement obligations include defined benefit and other post-retirement benefits. Please refer to Note H Retirement Plans and Critical Accounting Policies - Retirement Plans for additional information related to the retirement plans, including the important assumptions.
The estimate of the required contributions of CTS pension plans for 2005 is $1.6 million. There are no estimates included for these plans beyond 2005. Estimates for years after 2005 may be impacted by changes in actual plan results. In addition to the pension obligation, CTS provides other post-retirement benefits. Please refer to the Capital Requirements table for the estimated cash requirement for other post-retirement benefits.
CTS utilizes a market- related approach in deriving fair value of plan assets. CTS does not expect any significant change in the approach in 2005. For plan asset allocation detail, please refer to Note H. CTS does not expect any significant change on asset allocation in 2005 based on its current knowledge. However, CTS may change the asset allocation based on the performance of different asset categories after conducting investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and asset/liability studies on a regular basis.
Based on CTS experience, the actual return on plan assets can deviate from the expected return on plan assets. This deviation is taken into account in the market value related approach in deriving fair value of plan assets. The deviation between the expected return and the actual return was primarily due to market conditions. CTS performs a sensitivity analysis to assess the potential impact on the results of operations by the change in the expected long-term rates of return. A 25 basis-point change in the long-term rate of return would have changed the pension income in 2004 by $750,000.
12
CTS plans to invest in capital projects that maintain current capacity and result in future revenue opportunities. The 2005 capital spending is expected to be approximately $23 million.
In 2005, CTS used approximately $48 million of both existing cash balance and credit agreement borrowings to finance the cash portion of the SMTEK acquisition. Approximately $13 million was used to payoff SMTEKs existing debt and $35 million was delivered to SMTEK shareholders.
CTS has historically been able to fund its capital and operating needs through its cash flows from operations and available credit under its bank credit agreements. CTS believes that cash flows from operations and available borrowings under its current revolving credit agreement will be adequate to fund its working capital, capital expenditures, and debt service requirements through December 31, 2005 and until July 2007, when the credit agreement expires. However, CTS may choose to pursue additional equity and/or debt financing to fund acquisition and/or to improve capital structure.
Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In late December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. FAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). FAS No. 123R eliminates the alternative to use APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. FAS No. 123R will be effective for CTS during the third quarter of 2005. CTS currently follows the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 to account for stock options. Accordingly, the provisions of FAS No. 123R will reduce earnings upon adoption. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of FAS No. 123R to determine its impact on CTS financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB finalized FAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. FAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle agreement expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. FAS No. 151 is effective for CTS on January 1, 2006. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard, but does not expect the standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.
Market Risk
CTS is exposed to market risk, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. As discussed in Note A, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements, the financial statements of all CTS non-U.S. subsidiaries, except the United Kingdom subsidiary, are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. The Company does not have any significant net trade asset or liability exposure in a currency other than that of the reporting units functional currency. The market risk associated with foreign currency exchange rates comes primarily from revenue and expense transactions in currencies other than the reporting unit's functional currency. CTS monitors the effects of foreign currency fluctuations impacting its foreign subsidiaries and attempts, where possible, to mitigate the impact by matching the expenses in the same currencies in which revenues are generated.
As part of CTS risk management program, CTS performs sensitivity analyses to assess potential gains and losses in earnings and changes in fair value relating to hypothetical movements in interest rates. A 45 basis-point increase in interest rates (approximately 10% of CTS weighted-average interest rate) on variable-rate debt instruments would have increased CTS 2004 and 2003 interest expense by $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and would have an immaterial effect on the fair value of the debt instruments as of the end of such fiscal years.
# # # # # # #
Statements about the Companys earnings outlook and its
plans, estimates and beliefs concerning the future, including statements about
the anticipated benefits of the SMTEK acquisition, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These statements are based on managements expectations,
certain assumptions and currently available information. Actual results may
differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to
a variety of geopolitical, economic, health, industry and other factors which
could affect the Companys operating results, liquidity and financial
condition. We undertake no obligations to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement. Examples of factors which may affect future results
include, but are not limited to: rapid technological change, general market
conditions in the automotive, communications and computer industries; reliance
on key customers; the ability to protect our intellectual property; pricing
pressures and demand for our products; risks associated with our international
operations, including trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political
and geopolitical risks; and the ability to successfully integrate SMTEK into the
Companys operations.
13
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)
(In thousands of dollars except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 531,316 | $ | 462,987 | $ | 457,804 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
421,560 | 366,275 | 366,775 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
63,485 | 56,857 | 63,337 | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses
|
19,063 | 21,476 | 24,118 | |||||||||||
Gain on asset sales Note B
|
(3,920 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Restructuring and impairment charges Note C
|
| 4,563 | 18,343 | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss)
|
31,128 | 13,816 | (14,769 | ) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Other (expense) income:
|
||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(5,535 | ) | (7,688 | ) | (10,240 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income
|
922 | 357 | 396 | |||||||||||
Other
|
(598 | ) | (237 | ) | 813 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Total other expense
|
(5,211 | ) | (7,568 | ) | (9,031 | ) | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
25,917 | 6,248 | (23,800 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) Note J
|
5,961 | (6,327 | ) | (5,950 | ) | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 19,956 | $ | 12,575 | $ | (17,850 | ) | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share Note D
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | |||||||
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
CTS CORPORATION
14
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands of dollars)
December 31,
2004
2003
$
61,005
$
25,346
84,112
72,290
10,815
8,047
8,058
7,779
23,861
16,099
42,734
31,925
7,728
6,697
8,567
28,508
204,146
164,766
113,478
112,407
271,497
271,912
384,975
384,319
(272,480
)
(261,838
)
112,495
122,481
143,918
132,960
35,145
37,456
23,221
5,867
3,252
18,720
205,536
195,003
$
522,177
$
482,250
$
3,311
$
55,614
52,252
13,198
11,333
9,109
9,781
21,729
22,323
102,961
95,689
94,150
75,880
11,519
11,133
2,843
5,357
issued at December 31, 2004 and 52,632,088 shares issued at
December 31, 2003 Note K
263,297
262,748
22,761
21,520
279,064
263,430
1,348
151
566,470
547,849
(255,766
)
(253,658
)
310,704
294,191
$
522,177
$
482,250
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
CTS CORPORATION
15
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
19,956
$
12,575
$
(17,850
)
net cash provided by
operating activities:
26,082
33,605
43,373
4,563
18,343
(3,920
)
153
313
(10,802
)
(10,864
)
(12,053
)
(14,803
)
(301
)
(11,822
)
(8,488
)
17,761
(10,809
)
4,336
13,887
3,855
2,452
(24,767
)
150
(13,736
)
(404
)
1,186
2,402
(601
)
(5,989
)
13,093
41,987
13,967
25,668
24,137
19,813
4,126
2,954
(12,711
)
(9,044
)
(12,833
)
(136
)
(145
)
7,102
(5,054
)
(10,024
)
172,185
104,159
26,050
(153,915
)
(123,629
)
(83,213
)
3,311
(2,406
)
(570
)
(1,688
)
15,620
42,711
(2,005
)
(4,537
)
(4,087
)
(3,947
)
87
2,563
170
12,720
(5,944
)
(19,917
)
1,870
1,451
1,774
35,659
16,121
(4,030
)
25,346
9,225
13,255
$
61,005
$
25,346
$
9,225
$
4,857
$
6,443
$
8,348
6,901
7,573
5,882
$
104
$
1,417
$
110
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
CTS CORPORATION
16
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(In thousands of dollars)
Accumulated
Other
Additional
Comprehensive
Comprehensive
Common
Contributed
Retained
Earnings
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Capital
Earnings
(Loss)
(Loss)
Stock
Total
Balances at December 31, 2001
$
213,947
$
24,153
$
276,988
$
(1,702
)
$
(270,513
)
$
242,873
(17,850
)
$
(17,850
)
(17,850
)
(net of tax of $712)
1,661
1,661
1,661
(net of tax of $222)
(333
)
(333
)
(333
)
(net of tax of $215)
(461
)
(461
)
(461
)
(16,983
)
(4,053
)
(4,053
)
(713
)
151
562
362
362
13,450
(1,029
)
15,804
28,225
14,599
(123
)
10
14,486
110
110
Balances at December 31, 2002
241,393
23,514
255,085
(835
)
(254,137
)
265,020
12,575
12,575
12,575
(net of tax of $633)
1,476
1,476
1,476
(net of tax of $214)
(490
)
(490
)
(490
)
13,561
(4,230
)
(4,230
)
(93
)
(375
)
468
4,164
(1,939
)
11
2,236
4,930
4,930
10,690
10,690
247
320
567
1,417
1,417
Balances at December 31, 2003
262,748
21,520
263,430
151
(253,658
)
294,191
19,956
19,956
19,956
(net of tax of $889)
2,074
2,074
2,074
(net of tax of $580)
(877
)
(877
)
(877
)
$
21,153
(4,322
)
(4,322
)
(40
)
119
(79
)
171
13
(24
)
160
6
6
104
104
(2,005
)
(2,005
)
308
1,109
1,417
Balances at December 31, 2004
$
263,297
$
22,761
$
279,064
$
1,348
$
(255,766
)
$
310,704
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CTS CORPORATION
17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||
---|---|---|
NOTE ASummary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTS and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Translation of Foreign Currencies: The financial statements of CTS non-U.S. subsidiaries, except the United Kingdom subsidiary, are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency with all remeasurement adjustments included in the determination of net earnings. CTS Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) includes $0.7 million and $0.3 million of foreign currency translation expense for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The impact in 2002 was insignificant.
The assets and liabilities of CTS United Kingdom subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at period end, with resulting translation adjustments made directly to the accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) component of shareholders equity. Statement of earnings accounts are translated at the average rates during the period.
Comprehensive Earnings: CTS reports comprehensive earnings in accordance with FAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (Loss). The components of comprehensive earnings for CTS include foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains on forward contracts, minimum pension liability adjustments, and net earnings and are reported within the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity in the columns titled Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
The table below shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) at December 31:
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Accumulated translation
|
$ | 3,177 | $ | 1,103 | ||||
Minimum pension liability
|
(1,829 | ) | (952 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
$ | 1,348 | $ | 151 | ||||
|
|
Revenue Recognition: CTS recognizes revenue from product sales when title transfers, the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the sales price is fixed and determinable, and collection of the related receivable is probable, which is generally at the time of shipment. The Company has agreements with its distributors that provide limited rights of return within a limited time and protection against price reductions initiated by the Company. The effect of these programs is estimated based on historical experience and current economic conditions and provisions are recorded at the time of shipment. CTS customers typically have a right to return products that they consider to be defective. Revenue is recorded net of estimated returns of products, based on managements analysis of historical returns, current economic trends, and changes in customer demands. Provisions for returns and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded based on experience and other relevant factors.
Concentration of Credit Risk: The majority of cash and cash equivalents is invested in U.S. and Canadian government securities, with the remainder maintained with seven major financial institutions. Deposits with these banks exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, the deposits typically may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk.
Trade receivables subject CTS to the potential for credit risk with major customers. CTS sells its products to customers principally in the automotive, communications, and computer markets, primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia. CTS performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers to minimize credit risk. CTS does not require collateral. Sales to Hewlett-Packard Company (Hewlett-Packard) were 33% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002. Sales to Motorola, Inc. (Motorola) were 13% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and 12% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002. Amounts due from Hewlett-Packard and Motorola aggregated $41 million and $33 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Significant sales to a single customer expose CTS to a concentration of credit risk. Management, however, believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote.
18
Research and Development: Research and development costs include expenditures for planned search and investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge to be used to develop new products or processes or to significantly enhance existing products or production processes. It also includes the implementation of the new knowledge through design, testing of product alternatives, or construction of prototypes. CTS expenses all research and development costs as incurred.
Earnings Per Share: Basic and diluted earnings per common share are reported in conformity with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share excludes any dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock resulted
in the issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of CTS. Diluted
earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the incremental
shares that would have been outstanding upon the assumed exercise of dilutive
securities. If the common stock equivalents have an anti-dilutive effect, they
are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. Refer also to
Note D, Earnings Per Share.
Stock-Based Employee Compensation:
CTS
accounts for stock-based employee compensation using the intrinsic value method
prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and its related
Interpretations. Refer also to Note I, Stock Plans, for more details
about CTS stock-based compensation plans. Had employee compensation cost
for CTS fixed, stock-based compensation plans been determined based on
the fair value method, as defined by FAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, CTS net earnings (loss) and net earnings
(loss) per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated
below:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
2004
2003
2002
$
19,956
$
12,575
$
(17,850
)
net of tax, if fair value
based method were used
(1,254
)
(1,911
)
(3,063
)
$
18,702
$
10,664
$
(20,913
)
$
0.56
$
0.36
$
(0.54
)
0.52
0.31
(0.63
)
0.53
0.36
(0.54
)
$
0.50
$
0.30
$
(0.63
)
The weighted-average fair value of each option grant (which is
amortized over the option vesting period for purposes of determining the pro
forma impact) is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
2004
2003
2002
Grants
Grants
Grants
1.09
%
1.23
%
1.48
%
64.81
%
67.87
%
62.02
%
2.89
%
1.81
%
2.87
%
4.5 years
4.4 years
4.4 years
Cash Equivalents: CTS considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
19
Income Taxes:
CTS provides deferred income
taxes pursuant to the requirements of FAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. Under FAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and
income tax bases of assets and liabilities and carryforwards using currently
enacted tax rates. CTS estimates its income tax valuation allowance by assessing
which deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be recovered in the
future. Refer also to Note J, Income Taxes.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Useful lives for buildings and improvements range from 10 to 45 years. Machinery and equipment useful lives range from three to eight years. Amounts expended for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon disposition, any related gains or losses are included in operating earnings.
CTS assesses the carrying value of long-lived assets and the remaining useful lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. If the future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of the related assets are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment charge may be required to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets to fair value.
Retirement Plans: CTS has various defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans covering a majority of its employees. CTS policy is to annually fund the defined benefit pension plans at or above the minimum required by law. Refer also to Note H, Retirement Plans.
Intangible Assets: CTS assesses useful lives of its intangible assets based on the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to CTS cash flows. Intangible assets with a finite life, such as the Companys intangibles relating to customer lists and patents are amortized over that life on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company reviews the carrying value of its intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. Refer to Note E, Intangible Assets.
Financial Instruments: CTS financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables, and obligations under long-term debt. The carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, and trade receivables and payables approximates fair value based on the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying value for all long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 approximates fair value where fair value is based on market prices for the same or similar debt and maturities.
Amortization of Debt Issue Costs: CTS has debt issue costs that relate to the Companys long-term debt and are being amortized over the life of the debt or, for convertible debt, the period until the debt is first convertible into common stock. Amortization expense totaled $0.7 million in 2004, $1.2 million in 2003, and $1.6 million in 2002 and is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made for the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the classifications adopted in 2004.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In late December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. FAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). FAS No. 123R eliminates the alternative to use APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. FAS No. 123R will be effective for CTS during the third quarter of 2005. CTS currently follows the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 to account for stock options. Accordingly, the provisions of FAS No. 123R will reduce earnings upon adoption. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of FAS No. 123R to determine its impact on CTS financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB finalized FAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. FAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material. FAS No. 151 is effective for CTS on January 1, 2006. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard, but does not expect the standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.
20
NOTE BAsset Sales
The December 31, 2003 other assets balance sheet item included $17.6 million of assets held for sale. During 2004, CTS sold approximately $16.5 million of assets held for sale, including its Longtan, Taiwan building. The proceeds on the assets sales approximated the carrying value. In addition, due to changes in circumstances, which were previously considered unlikely, $1.1 million of the assets held for sale at December 31, 2003 were reclassified to fixed assets during 2004.
During 2004, CTS also sold excess land located near its Canadian facility for approximately $2.7 million. Cash proceeds related to the sale approximated $2.1 million, with the remaining proceeds of $0.6 million evidenced by a secured note receivable due in May 2006. A gain of $2.7 million was recognized on the sale.
NOTE CRestructuring and Impairment Charges
During the third quarter of 2003, CTS recorded a $4.6 million pre-tax asset impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of certain assets, held by the Components and Sensors business segment, to their estimated fair value. Approximately $3.3 million of the impairment charge reflected a write down for electronic equipment following final production of previously announced end-of-life products and a re-assessment of the current market value for equipment held for sale. An additional $1.3 million of the impairment charge related to equipment write down on a production line following an assessment of future capacity needs. All restructuring-related reserve balances had been fully utilized at December 31, 2003.
In the third quarter of 2002, CTS recorded $18.3 million
of pre-tax restructuring and impairment charges. The charge included $5.0 of
million restructuring charges, $12.5 million of asset impairments and $0.8
million of pension curtailment losses. The charges were incurred in order to
effect operational improvements and related organizational realignments
primarily in the Components and Sensors business segment, involving the
relocation of certain manufacturing operations. CTS completed substantially all
of these restructuring actions by the end of 2002. Also during 2002, CTS
recorded in cost of sales $1.3 million of restructuring-related charges
consisting primarily of equipment relocation costs.
NOTE DEarnings Per Share
FAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, requires
companies to provide a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the
basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations. The calculation
below provides net earnings, average common shares outstanding and the resultant
earnings per share for both basic and diluted EPS for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Net
Shares
Earnings
(In thousands)
Per Share
(In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
(Numerator)
(Denominator)
Amount
$
19,956
35,910
$
0.56
382
632
2,575
26
(1)
$
20,588
38,893
$
0.53
$
12,575
34,723
$
0.36
146
120
(1)
$
12,575
34,989
$
0.36
(1) | Represents shares of CTS common stock to be issued to the former DCA shareholders. |
21
The following table shows the potentially dilutive securities
which have been excluded from the 2004, 2003, and 2002 diluted earnings (loss)
per share calculations because they are either anti-dilutive or the exercise price
exceeds the average market price.
Year ended
December 31,
(Number of shares in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
232
market price of
common shares during the period
737
1,139
1,185
market price of
common shares during the period
50
1,247
1,247
935
In November 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) modified the consensus reached on Issue No. 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, making the new standard effective for CTS in 2004. Contingently convertible debt instruments (commonly referred to as Co-Cos) are financial instruments that add a contingent feature to a convertible debt instrument. Co-Cos are generally convertible into common shares of the issuer after the common stock price has exceeded a predetermined threshold for a specified time period. CTS $60 million convertible debentures (refer to Note G, Debt) are considered to be a contingently convertible debt instrument.
Prior to the issuance of EITF No. 04-8, generally accepted accounting principles allowed companies to exclude the potential dilutive effect of the conversion feature from diluted earnings per share until the market price contingency was met. EITF Issue No. 04-8 requires companies to include the impact of Co-Cos in their diluted earnings per share computation regardless of whether the market price trigger has been met. Diluted earnings per share in 2004 have been computed following the requirements of EITF No. 04-8. Diluted earnings per share for 2003 were not impacted by this new standard as the $60 million convertible debentures were not outstanding in 2003. EITF No. 04-8 reduced 2004 diluted earnings per share by $0.02.
Note EIntangible Assets
CTS has the following intangible assets, all relating to the Components and Sensors business segment, as of December 31:
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Customer lists
|
$ | 36,405 | $ | (6,490 | ) | $ | 36,405 | $ | (5,246 | ) | ||||||||
Patents
|
10,319 | (5,602 | ) | 10,319 | (4,535 | ) | ||||||||||||
Technology
|
| | 12,014 | (12,014 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other
|
| | 300 | (300 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total
|
46,724 | (12,092 | ) | 59,038 | (22,095 | ) | ||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
513 | | 513 | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total intangibles
|
$ | 47,237 | $ | (12,092 | ) | $ | 59,551 | $ | (22,095 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
CTS recorded amortization expense of $2.3 million, $2.5 million, and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. CTS estimates annual amortization expense of $2.3 million in 2005 through 2008, and $1.7 million in 2009, excluding the impact of the SMTEK acquisition in January 2005 as discussed in Note P, Subsequent Event..
22
NOTE FNotes Payable
CTS had unsecured line of credit arrangements of $13.3 million and $17.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These arrangements are generally subject to annual renewal and renegotiation, and may be withdrawn at the banks' option. Average daily short-term borrowing, including borrowings denominated in non-U.S. currencies, were $10.0 million during 2004. The weighted-average interest rate, computed by relating interest expense to average daily short-term borrowings, was 3.4% in 2004.
NOTE GDebt
Long-term debt was comprised of the following at December 31:
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Revolving credit agreement, average interest rate
of 4.2% (2004) and 3.1% (2003), due in 2007
|
$ | 9,150 | $ | 8,880 | |||||
Convertible, senior subordinated debentures at a weighted-average rate of 2.1%, due in 2024
|
60,000 | | |||||||
Convertible, subordinated debentures at a weighted-averaged rate of 6.5%, due in
2007
|
25,000 | 25,000 | |||||||
Industrial revenue bonds at a weighted-averaged rate of 7.5%
|
| 42,000 | |||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
94,150 | 75,880 | |||||||
Less current maturities
|
| | |||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Total long-term debt
|
$ | 94,150 | $ | 75,880 | |||||
|
|
|
The debt matures as follows: 2007 - $34.2 million; after
2010 - $60 million.
In October 2004, CTS amended its revolving credit agreement to expand the borrowing capacity from $50 million to $75 million. The amendment also extended the term of the revolving credit agreement by one year, to July 2007, and modified provisions related to permitted acquisitions and certain financial covenants. The outstanding balance was $9.2 million at December 31, 2004.
Any outstanding balances under the revolving credit agreement are senior to CTS convertible debentures. The revolving credit agreement is collaterized by substantially all U.S. assets and a pledge of 65% of the capital stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Interest rates on the revolving credit agreement fluctuate based upon LIBOR. CTS pays a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit agreement. The commitment fee varies based on performance under certain financial covenants and was 0.38 percent per annum at December 31, 2004. The revolving credit agreement requires, among other things, that CTS comply with a minimum fixed charge coverage, a maximum leverage ratio, and a minimum tangible net worth. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit agreement. Additionally, the revolving credit agreement limits the amounts allowed for dividends, capital expenditures, and acquisitions.
23
In May 2004, CTS issued $60 million convertible senior subordinated debentures ($60 million Debentures). These unsecured debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 2.125%, payable semiannually on May 1 and November 1 of each year through the maturity date of May 1, 2024. The $60 million Debentures are convertible, under certain circumstances, into CTS common stock at a conversion price of $15.00 per share (which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 66.6667 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes). Upon conversion of the $60 million Debentures, in lieu of delivering common stock, the Company may, at its discretion, deliver cash or a combination of cash and common stock.
Holders may convert the $60 million Debentures at any time during a conversion period if the closing price of CTS common stock is more than 120% of the conversion price ($18.00 per common share) for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the first trading day of the conversion period. The conversion periods begin on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 of each year. Holders may also convert the notes if certain corporate transactions occur. As of December 31, 2004, none of the conditions for conversion of the $60 million Debentures were satisfied.
CTS may, at its option, redeem all or a portion of the $60 million Debentures for cash at any time on or after May 1, 2009, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest at the redemption date. Holders may require CTS to purchase for cash all or part of their notes on May 1, 2009, 2014, and 2019, or upon the occurrence of certain events, at 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the date of purchase.
CTS used a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the $60 million Debentures to repay $40 million of its 7.5% industrial revenue bonds that were due in 2013. Another $2 million of industrial revenue bonds were repaid with cash flows from operations in the first quarter of 2004.
In connection with the issuance of the $60 million Debentures, CTS incurred $2.4 million of issuance costs, which primarily consisted of investment banker, legal, and other professional fees. These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the five year period from May 1, 2004 through May 1, 2009.
In April 2002, the Company issued $25 million of five-year, 6.5% convertible, subordinated debentures ($25 million Debentures). These debentures are unsecured and convert into CTS common stock at a conversion price of $20.05 per share. At any time after the three-year anniversary of the issue date, the purchasers may accelerate the maturity of the debentures. CTS also has the right after such three-year anniversary and under certain circumstances, to force conversion of the debentures into common stock. Interest on the debentures is payable semi-annually.
NOTE HRetirement Plans
Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
CTS has a number of noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (Pension Plans) covering approximately 29% of its employees. Plans covering salaried employees provide pension benefits that are based on the employees´ compensation prior to retirement. Plans covering hourly employees generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service.
CTS provides postretirement life insurance benefits for certain retired employees. Domestic employees who were hired prior to 1982 and certain domestic union employees are eligible for life insurance benefits upon retirement. CTS funds life insurance benefits through term life insurance policies and intends to continue funding all of the premiums on a pay-as-you-go basis.
24
The measurement date for the majority of the Pension Plans and
other postretirement plan assets and benefit obligations was December 31, 2004
and 2003. The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligation,
plan assets, and the funded status of the Pension Plans and other postretirement
benefit plan at that measurement date.
Pension
Other
Plans
Postretirement Benefit Plan
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
2004
2003
$
185,302
$
171,470
$
5,433
$
5,100
$
186,950
$
167,447
$
5,100
$
4,838
5,292
4,916
31
39
11,265
10,910
309
317
954
1,237
1,231
12,165
140
198
(9,200
)
(9,725
)
(147
)
(292
)
$
196,492
$
186,950
$
5,433
$
5,100
$
259,764
$
222,435
$
$
24,364
46,025
1,550
571
147
292
(9,200
)
(9,725
)
(147
)
(292
)
513
458
$
276,991
$
259,764
$
$
$
80,499
$
72,814
$
(5,433
)
$
(5,100
)
53,689
50,228
423
284
5,157
5,931
5
5
(304
)
(796
)
$
139,041
$
128,177
$
(5,005
)
$
(4,811
)
The components of the prepaid (accrued) cost, net are classified in the following lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Pension | Other | ||||||||||||||||
Plans | Postretirement Benefit Plan | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Prepaid pension asset
|
$ | 143,918 | $ | 132,960 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Other accrued liabilities
|
(1,645 | ) | (462 | ) | (150 | ) | (300 | ) | |||||||||
Other long-term obligations
|
(6,073 | ) | (5,701 | ) | (4,855 | ) | (4,511 | ) | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
2,841 | 1,380 | | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
$ | 139,041 | $ | 128,177 | $ | (5,005 | ) | $ | (4,811 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
25
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for those Pension Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 is shown below:
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
Projected benefit obligation | $ | 15,639 | $ | 13,768 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligation | 14,123 | 11,004 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets | 6,405 | 4,841 |
Net pension (income)/postretirement expense in 2004, 2003, and 2002 includes the following components:
Pension Plans | Other Postretirement Benefit Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 5,292 | $ | 4,916 | $ | 6,059 | $ | 31 | $ | 39 | $ | 33 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
11,265 | 10,910 | 11,467 | 310 | 317 | 318 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
(1)
|
(27,051 | ) | (26,924 | ) | (29,786 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition obligation
|
(492 | ) | (564 | ) | (554 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost
|
901 | 883 | 832 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Recognized (gain) loss
|
658 | (936 | ) | (2,821 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Curtailment loss
(2)
|
| | 768 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net (income) expense
|
$ | (9,427 | ) | $ | (11,715 | ) | $ | (14,035 | ) | $ | 342 | $ | 357 | $ | 352 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions
(3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation assumptions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
5.94 | % | 6.17 | % | 6.67 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.75 | ||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.83 | % | 4.84 | % | 4.84 | % | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Pension income/postretirement
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
expense assumptions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
6.17 | % | 6.67 | % | 7.14 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.75 | % | 7.25 | % | |||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
(1)
|
8.70 | % | 8.94 | % | 9.67 | % | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.83 | % | 4.84 | % | 5.84 | % | | | |
(1) | Expected return on plan assets is net of expected investment expenses and certain administrative expenses. |
(2) | The 2002 pension curtailment loss resulted from plant closings and reductions in employment levels that occurred as part of the restructuring actions. |
(3) | During the fourth quarter of each year, CTS reviews its actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted. |
CTS utilizes a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets are reviewed and long-term relationships between equities and fixed-income are preserved consistent with the generally accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long term. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio return is established via a building block approach with proper consideration of diversification and rebalancing. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to ensure for reasonableness and appropriateness.
26
CTS´ pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and target allocation for 2005 by asset category are as follows:
Target | Percentage of Plan | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allocation | Assets at December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Asset Category | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Equity securities | 65 | % | 58 | % (1) | 65 | % (1) | |||||||
Debt securities | 33 | % | 28 | % | 34 | % | |||||||
Real estate | | % | | % | | % | |||||||
Other | 2 | % | 14 | % (2) | 1 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
(1) |
Equity securities include CTS common stock in
the amounts of approximately $19 million (7% of total plan assets)
at December 31, 2004, and approximately $17 million (7% of total plan assets) at December 31, 2003. |
(2) | Included in the December 31, 2004 "Other" asset category is approximately $25 million of cash. This short-term increase in cash arose as CTS liquidated assets held by a few fund managers and transferred the cash to new fund managers at year end. This change in fund managers was made to further diversify the pension asset portfolio, and improve overall return on assets by reducing administrative expenses. After December 31, 2004, the cash was re-invested by the new fund managers and the percentage of assets by category was as follows: Equity securities - 65%, Debt securities - 33%, and Other - 2%. |
CTS employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities and funded status. The investment portfolio primarily contains a diversified mix of equity and fixed-income investments. The equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth, value, and small, and large capitalizations. Other assets such as private equity are used modestly to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and asset/liability studies at regular intervals.
The expected contributions to be made by CTS to the Pension Plans and the other postretirement benefit plan during 2005 are $1.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
Other | |||||||
|
Postretirement | |||||||
($ in thousands) |
Pension Plans
|
Benefit Plans | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2005
|
$ | 9,869 | $ | 349 | ||||
2006
|
10,237 | 358 | ||||||
2007
|
10,657 | 367 | ||||||
2008
|
12,024 | 375 | ||||||
2009
|
11,894 | 382 | ||||||
Years 2010 - 2014
|
72,659 | 1,954 |
Defined Contribution Plans
CTS sponsors a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all of
its U.S. employees. Contributions and costs are generally determined as a
percentage of the covered employees annual salary. Amounts expensed for
the 401(k) plan and the other plans totaled $3.0 million in 2004, $3.0 million
in 2003 and $3.4 million in 2002.
27
NOTE IStock Plans
At December 31, 2004, CTS had five stock-based compensation plans: the 1988 Restricted Stock and Cash Bonus Plan (1988 Plan), the 1996 Stock Option Plan (1996 Plan), the 2001 Stock Option Plan (2001 Plan), the Nonemployee Directors Stock Retirement Plan (Directors Plan), and the 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2004 Plan). As of December 2004, additional grants can only be made under the 2004 Plan.
CTS applies the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 in determining compensation costs for stock-based employee compensation. Stock-based compensation expense for nonemployee directors is determined in accordance with FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, and was approximately $0.1 million in 2004 and $0.2 million in 2003.
The 2004 Plan, and previously the 1996 Plan and 2001 Plan, provides for grants of incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to officers, key employees and nonemployee members of CTS board of directors. In addition, the 2004 Plan also allows for grants of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other stock awards.
Options are exercisable in cumulative annual installments over a maximum ten-year period, commencing at least one year from the date of grant. The following table summarizes the status of these plans as of December 31, 2004:
2004 Plan | 2001 Plan | 1996 Plan | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
Awards originally available
|
6,500,000 | 2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | |||||||||
Options outstanding
|
105,100 | 1,086,775 | 445,025 | |||||||||
Restricted stock units outstanding
|
258,375 | | | |||||||||
Awards exercisable
|
| 515,625 | 307,875 | |||||||||
Awards available for grant
|
6,111,587 | | |
A summary of the status of stock options as of
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, and changes during the years ended on
those dates, is presented below:
2004
2003
2002
Weighted-
Weighted-
Weighted-
Average
Average
Average
Exercise
Exercise
Exercise
Shares
Price
Shares
Price
Shares
Price
1,621,925
$
17.33
1,560,789
$
18.74
1,287,939
$
23.69
129,900
11.74
482,600
9.52
448,500
8.10
(21,000
)
8.12
(244,114
)
10.40
(93,925
)
20.89
(177,350
)
18.17
(175,650
)
27.55
1,636,900
$
16.80
1,621,925
$
17.33
1,560,789
$
18.74
823,500
525,200
626,664
$
5.49
$
4.84
$
7.22
3.16
$
11.74
$
9.78
$
8.10
7.75
28
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units
(RSUs) entitle the holder to receive one share of common stock for each unit
when the units vest. RSUs are issued to officers and key employees as
compensation. Generally, the RSUs vest over a five-year period. During 2004, CTS
recorded $0.8 million of compensation expense relating to RSUs. The following
table summarizes the RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Weighted-
Weighted-
Range of
Number
Remaining
Average
Number
Average
Exercise
Outstanding
Contractual
Exercise
Exercisable
Exercise
Prices
at 12/31/04
Life (Years)
Price
at 12/31/04
Price
$
894,850
8.22
$
9.01
301,300
$
8.44
200,800
5.51
15.14
67,500
16.83
415,500
5.98
24.99
341,450
25.39
122,250
5.67
47.48
109,750
47.78
3,500
5.14
59.05
3,500
59.05
RSUs
258,375
$
11.08
Restricted Stock
CTS 1988 Plan originally reserved 2,400,000 shares of CTS common stock for sale, at a market price or award, to key employees. Under the 1988 Plan, approximately 83,000 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2004. Shares sold or awarded are subject to restrictions against transfer and repurchase rights of CTS. In general, restrictions lapse at the rate of 20% per year beginning one year from the grant date. In addition, the 1988 Plan provides for a cash bonus to the participant equal to the fair market value of the shares on the dates restrictions lapse, in the case of an award. The total bonus paid to any participant during the restricted period is limited to twice the fair market value of the shares on the date of award or sale. CTS recorded expense of $0.7 million in 2004, $0.3 million in 2003, and income of $0.9 million in 2002, under the formula provisions of the 1988 Plan which are based on the fair market value of a share of common stock.
Stock Retirement Plan
The Directors Plan provides for a portion of the total compensation payable to nonemployee directors to be deferred and paid in CTS stock. The amount of compensation expense under the Directors Plan was $0.1 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002. The Directors Plan was frozen effective December 1, 2004. All future grants to nonemployee directors will be from the 2004 Plan.
29
NOTE JIncome Taxes
Earnings (loss) before income taxes consist of the following:
($ in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 2,921 | $ | 767 | $ | (8,670 | ) | |||||||||
Non-U.S.
|
22,996 | 5,481 | (15,130 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total | $ | 25,917 | $ | 6,248 | $ | (23,800 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Significant components of income tax provision
(benefit) are as follows:
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
$
(7,889
)
$
563
165
368
5,245
1,084
4,484
5,808
(6,640
)
4,852
(3,100
)
(3,480
)
(7,834
)
1,654
(96
)
(1,275
)
1,599
3,889
(1,693
)
153
313
(10,802
)
$
5,961
$
(6,327
)
$
(5,950
)
30
Significant components of CTS deferred tax liabilities
and assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are:
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
$
51,138
$
48,529
2,274
377
53,412
48,906
3,764
1,752
1,703
1,671
2,440
59,223
49,598
7,090
8,207
4,146
3,235
6,824
8,689
3,308
5,516
87,778
79,388
34,366
30,482
(6,219
)
(2,074
)
$
28,147
$
28,408
At each reporting period, the company assesses the ultimate realizability of its net deferred tax assets, including deferred tax assets associated with accumulated net operating losses in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. In assessing the ultimate realizability of its net deferred tax assets, the company considers its past performance, available tax strategies, and expected future taxable income during the tax loss and credit carryforward periods.
Generally, the Company has assessed that it is more likely than not that its net tax assets will be realized during the available carryforward periods. The Company has determined, however, that a valuation allowance of $6.2 million should be provided for the net deferred tax assets in a foreign jurisdiction. The $4.1 million increase in the valuation allowance from December 31, 2003 to 2004 is due to an increase in the related net tax assets resulting, in part, from an increase in the statutory tax rate in the foreign jurisdiction, offset by the utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2004 the $6.2 million valuation allowance includes $1.4 million related to net operating loss carryforward assets and $4.8 million related to other deductible temporary differences in a foreign jurisdiction.
The Companys U.S. deferred tax assets of $54.4 million relate to U.S. net operating loss carryforwards that expire in 2021 through 2024. The Company has foreign deferred tax assets of $4.8 million related to foreign net operating loss carryforwards, of which $3.3 million begins expiring in 2006 while the remaining $1.5 million carries forward indefinitely.
The overall effective income tax rate (expressed as a
percentage of income before income taxes) varied from the U.S. statutory income
tax rate as follows:
2004
2003
2002
35.0
%
35.0
%
(35.0
)%
5.6
%
0.7
%
(2.5
)%
(11.3
)%
(2.0
)%
25.1
%
(0.5
)%
(3.4
)%
(4.1
)%
(2.3
)%
(4.0
)%
(6.1
)%
(7.4
)%
0.5
%
0.8
%
(1.1
)%
23.0
%
25.0
%
(25.0
)%
(126.3
)%
23.0
%
(101.3
)%
(25.0
)%
31
CTS tax rate before the benefit of reserve reversals decreased from 25% to 23% in 2004, primarily as a result of increased profits being reported in lower-taxed jurisdictions. During 2003, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $7.9 million resulting from the reversal of reserves that were no longer required following the expiration of statutory deadlines.
In certain taxing jurisdictions, CTS business operations qualify for income tax holidays. As a result, certain earnings of CTS are subject to tax at reduced rates for specified periods of time. These tax holidays, unless extended, are scheduled to expire in 2009 - 2012.
At December 31, 2004, no provision had been made for U.S. federal and state income taxes on approximately $174 million of foreign earnings, which are expected to be reinvested outside of the United States indefinitely. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to a possible adjustment for foreign tax credits), state income taxes, and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. In the event all undistributed earnings were remitted, approximately $6 million of foreign withholding taxes would be imposed.
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Jobs Act) was signed into law. The Jobs Act provides certain domestic companies a temporary opportunity to repatriate previously undistributed earnings of controlled foreign subsidiaries at a reduced federal tax rate of 5.25%. The reduced rate is achieved by providing an 85% dividends received deduction on earnings repatriated during a one-year period. To qualify, the repatriated earnings must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by the companys chief executive officer and subsequently approved by the companys board of directors. Certain other criteria in the Jobs Act must be satisfied as well. For CTS, the one-year period during which the qualifying distributions can be made is 2005. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether it will repatriate foreign earnings under the provisions of the Jobs Act and has not made a decision on whether it will make any distributions. If the Company determines that a distribution will be made, the range of reasonably possible amounts eligible for the temporary deduction is $45 million to $75 million. CTS is assessing the impact of proposed statutory technical corrections with respect to certain provisions in the Jobs Act prior to determining the amounts, if any, it will repatriate. CTS expects to determine the amounts and sources of foreign earnings to be repatriated, if any, no later than the fourth quarter of 2005. While the Company is not yet in a position to determine the impact of a qualifying repatriation on its income tax expense for 2005, the related potential range of income tax effects on the reasonably possible repatriation amounts is estimated at $4 million to $6 million, of which foreign withholding taxes are estimated to be approximately $1 million.
NOTE KCapital Stock
CTS adopted a Rights Plan on August 28, 1998. The Rights Plan was implemented by declaring a dividend, distributable to shareholders of record on September 10, 1998, of one common share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of common stock held at the close of business on that date. Each Right under the Rights Plan will initially entitle registered holders of common stock to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of CTS Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $125, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group (1) acquires or obtains the right to acquire 15% or more of the common stock or (2) announces a tender offer that would result in any person or group acquiring beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding common stock. The Rights are redeemable for $0.01 per Right (subject to adjustment) at the option of the Board of Directors. Until a Right is exercised, the holder of the Right, as such, has no rights as a shareholder of CTS. The Rights will expire on August 27, 2008, unless redeemed or exchanged by CTS prior to that date.
NOTE LTreasury Stock
Common stock held in treasury at December 31, 2004 totaled 16,757,907 shares with a cost of $255.8 million, compared to 16,565,558 shares with a cost of $253.7 million at December 31, 2003.
In July 2004, CTS Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to one million shares of its common stock in the open market during the next two years. This July 2004 authorization effectively canceled the boards previous stock repurchase authorization. Reacquired shares will be used to support equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate purposes. During 2004, CTS repurchased 183,000 shares at a total cost of $2.0 million. At December 31, 2004, CTS was authorized to repurchase approximately 817,000 additional shares.
32
NOTE MBusiness Segments
FAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires companies to provide certain information about their operating segments. CTS has two reportable business segments: 1) Components and Sensors and 2) Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS).
Components and sensors are products which perform specific electronic functions for a given product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Components and sensors consist principally of automotive sensors and actuators used in commercial or consumer vehicles; electronic components used in cellular handsets, communications infrastructure and computer markets; low temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) electronic substrates used in various communications applications; terminators, including ClearONE terminators, used in computer and other high speed applications, switches, resistor networks and potentiometers used to serve multiple markets.
EMS includes the higher level assembly of electronic and mechanical components into a finished subassembly or assembly performed under a contract manufacturing agreement with an OEM or other contract manufacturer. EMS also includes design and manufacture of interconnect systems and complex backplanes as may be required by the customer.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Management evaluates performance based upon operating earnings before interest
and income taxes.
Summarized financial information concerning CTS
reportable segments is shown in the following table:
Components
($ in thousands)
& Sensors
EMS
Total
$
260,982
$
270,334
$
531,316
23,311
(1)
7,817
31,128
422,420
99,757
522,177
22,562
3,520
26,082
$
9,824
$
2,887
$
12,711
$
252,911
$
210,076
$
462,987
7,394
10,985
18,379
398,791
83,459
482,250
30,412
3,193
33,605
$
8,091
$
953
$
9,044
$
270,919
$
186,885
$
457,804
(5,927
)
10,790
4,863
419,628
70,404
490,032
40,553
2,820
43,373
$
12,298
$
535
$
12,833
(1) | Includes $3.9 million of gain on asset sales (refer also to Note B, Asset Sales). |
Reconciling information between reportable segments
operating earnings and CTS consolidated pre-tax income (loss) is
shown in the following table:
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
31,128
$
18,379
$
4,863
(5,535
)
(7,688
)
(10,240
)
922
357
396
(598
)
(237
)
813
(4,563
)
(19,498
)
(134
)
$
25,917
$
6,248
$
(23,800
)
33
Financial information relating to CTS operations by
geographic area was as follows:
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
197,557
$
186,675
$
199,982
122,129
127,522
125,252
105,196
96,492
80,615
66,989
15,244
21,330
28,468
27,535
20,201
10,977
9,519
10,424
$
531,316
$
462,987
$
457,804
Sales are attributed to countries based upon the origin of the
sale.
($ in thousands)
2004
2003
2002
$
42,016
$
48,680
$
58,017
40,659
43,220
55,723
14,990
17,667
17,967
7,319
8,077
14,856
2,008
19,098
21,265
5,503
3,322
3,939
$
112,495
$
140,064
$
171,767
The EMS business segment revenues from Hewlett-Packard
represented $177.3 million, or 66%, and $151.8 million, or 72%, and
$150.4 million, or 80%, of the segments revenue for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. EMS business segment
revenues from Motorola were $60.9 million, or 23%, and $40.2 million, or 19%, of
the segments revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Components and Sensors business segment revenues from Motorola
represent $38.6 million, or 14% of the segments revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2002. The Components and Sensors business segment
revenue from Motorola for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was less
than 10% of the segments revenue.
34
NOTE NContingencies
Certain processes in the manufacture of CTS current and past products create hazardous waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and regulations. CTS has been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups, that it is or may be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) regarding hazardous waste remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to these non-CTS sites, CTS has an ongoing practice of providing reserves for probable remediation activities at certain of its manufacturing locations and for claims and proceedings against CTS with respect to other environmental matters. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information relating to all such matters, either adequate provision for probable costs has been made, or the ultimate costs resulting will not materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of CTS.
Certain claims are pending against CTS with respect to matters arising out of the ordinary conduct of its business. For all claims, in the opinion of management, based upon presently available information, either adequate provision for anticipated costs has been made or the ultimate anticipated costs resulting will not materially affect CTS consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of CTS.
NOTE OLeases
CTS incurred approximately $7.1 million of rent expense in 2004, $6.8 million in 2003, and $7.4 million in 2002. The future minimum lease payments under the Companys operating leases are $6.3 million in 2005, $5.3 million in 2006, $2.6 million in 2007, $2.6 million in 2008, $2.2 million in 2009, and $4.7 million thereafter.
NOTE PSubsequent Event
On November 16, 2004, CTS entered into a merger agreement with SMTEK International, Inc. (SMTEK). The agreement was approved by SMTEK shareholders on January 31, 2005. Under the terms of the merger agreement, CTS acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares and SMTEK shareholders received $14.26, comprised of $10.73 in cash and $3.53 worth of CTS common stock. In addition, CTS assumed approximately $13 million of SMTEK debt. In connection with the merger, CTS issued 812,365 additional shares of common stock.
SMTEK is an EMS provider serving original equipment manufacturers in the medical, industrial, instrumentation, telecommunications, security, financial services, automation, aerospace and defense industries. SMTEK's four facilities are located in Moorpark and Santa Clara, California; Marlborough, Massachusetts; and Bangkok, Thailand. As a result of the acquisition, CTS expects to expand into new EMS markets, reduce customer concentrations, and increase its global footprint.
The estimated aggregate purchase price is approximately $60 million, consisting of $35 million cash consideration, $13 million of SMTEK debt assumed by CTS, CTS common stock valued at $10 million, and $2 million of estimated transactions costs. CTS is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain intangible assets, thus the allocation of the purchase price to major assets and liability captions is currently being completed.
35
Shareholder Information
(In thousands of dollars except per share data)
Quarterly Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
Operating | ||||||||||||||||
Net | Gross | Earnings | Net | |||||||||||||
Sales | Margins | (Loss) | Earnings | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
4th quarter
|
$ | 142,496 | $ | 29,918 | $ | 9,737 | $ | 6,618 | ||||||||
3rd quarter
|
129,049 | 26,312 | 5,854 | 3,921 | ||||||||||||
2nd quarter
(1)
|
137,624 | 28,917 | 10,628 | 6,897 | ||||||||||||
1st quarter
|
122,147 | 24,609 | 4,909 | 2,520 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
$ | 531,316 | $ | 109,756 | $ | 31,128 | $ | 19,956 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||||||
4th quarter
|
$ | 132,025 | $ | 27,454 | $ | 7,369 | $ | 3,947 | ||||||||
3rd quarter
(2)
|
108,496 | 23,655 | (654 | ) | 6,074 | |||||||||||
2nd quarter
|
116,697 | 24,520 | 4,507 | 1,983 | ||||||||||||
1st quarter
|
105,769 | 21,083 | 2,594 | 571 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
$ | 462,987 | $ | 96,712 | $ | 13,816 | $ | 12,575 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
(Unaudited)
Dividends | Net Earnings | |||||||||||||||||||
High (4) | Low (4) | Declared | Basic | Diluted | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4th quarter
|
$ | 13.92 | $ | 11.95 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||||
3rd quarter
|
12.99 | 10.10 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.10 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
2nd quarter
(1)
|
14.80 | 9.90 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.18 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
1st quarter
|
15.85 | 11.60 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.07 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4th quarter
|
$ | 14.94 | $ | 10.75 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||||||
3rd quarter
(2)
|
14.71 | 10.01 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||
2nd quarter
|
11.10 | 5.50 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||
1st quarter
|
8.85 | 4.90 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | The second quarter of 2004 includes a gain on the sale of excess land located near CTS' Canadian facility of approximately $2.7 million pre-tax, $2.1 million after-tax, or $0.05 per diluted share. |
(2) | The third quarter 2003 results include an asset impairment charge of $4.6 million pre-tax, $3.4 million after-tax, or $0.10 per diluted share. The third quarter 2003 also includes $7.9 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, favorable income tax adjustment resulting from the reversal of reserves that were no longer required following the expiration of statutory deadlines. |
(3) | Diluted earnings per share for the second and third quarters of 2004 have been restated to reflect the impact of adopting Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 04-08, "The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share." EITF No. 04-08 was issued and became effective in the fourth quarter of 2004. Earlier quarters have been restated to show diluted earnings per share computed on a consistent basis. Refer also to Note D, "Earnings Per Share." |
(4) | The market prices of CTS common stock presented reflect the highest and lowest sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter of the last two years. |
CTS CORPORATION
36
Five-Year Summary
(In thousands of dollars except per share and other data)
% of | % of | % of | % of | % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Sales | 2003 | Sales | 2002 | Sales | 2001 | Sales | 2000 | Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 531,316 | 100.0 | $ | 462,987 | 100.0 | $ | 457,804 | 100.0 | $ | 577,654 | 100.0 | $ | 866,523 | 100.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
421,560 | 79.3 | 366,275 | 79.1 | 366,775 | 80.1 | 466,363 | 80.7 | 605,598 | 69.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
61,174 | 11.5 | 54,390 | 11.8 | 59,467 | 13.0 | 80,214 | 13.9 | 94,501 | 10.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses
|
19,063 | 3.6 | 21,476 | 4.6 | 24,118 | 5.3 | 32,762 | 5.7 | 32,583 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets
|
2,311 | 0.4 | 2,467 | 0.5 | 3,870 | 0.8 | 6,765 | 1.2 | 5,211 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on asset sales
|
(3,920 | ) | (0.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and impairment charges
|
| | 4,563 | 1.0 | 18,343 | 4.0 | 40,039 | 6.9 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss)
|
31,128 | 5.9 | 13,816 | 3.0 | (14,769 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (48,489 | ) | (8.4 | ) | 128,630 | 14.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expensenet
|
(5,211 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (7,568 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (9,031 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (12,002 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (11,503 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
25,917 | 4.9 | 6,248 | 1.4 | (23,800 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (60,491 | ) | (10.5 | ) | 117,127 | 13.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
5,961 | 1.1 | (6,327 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (5,950 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (15,116 | ) | (2.6 | ) | 32,796 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
19,956 | 3.8 | 12,575 | 2.7 | (17,850 | ) | (3.9 | ) | (45,375 | ) | (7.9 | ) | 84,331 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
| | | | | | | | (529 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
19,956 | 3.8 | 12,575 | 2.7 | (17,850 | ) | (3.9 | ) | (45,375 | ) | (7.9 | ) | 83,802 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained earningsbeginning of year
|
263,430 | 255,085 | 276,988 | 325,850 | 245,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
(4,322 | ) | (4,230 | ) | (4,053 | ) | (3,487 | ) | (3,366 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained earningsend of year
|
$ | 279,064 | $ | 263,430 | $ | 255,085 | $ | 276,988 | $ | 325,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (1.61 | ) | $ | 3.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
| | | | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (1.61 | ) | $ | 3.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (1.61 | ) | $ | 2.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
| | | | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.36 | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (1.61 | ) | $ | 2.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average basic shares outstanding (000s)
|
35,910 | 34,723 | 33,148 | 28,231 | 27,623 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average diluted shares outstanding (000s)
|
38,893 | 34,989 | 33,148 | 28,231 | 28,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
12,711 | 9,044 | 12,833 | 77,654 | 119,216 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
26,082 | 33,605 | 43,373 | 51,674 | 44,325 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Position at Year End
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets
|
$ | 204,146 | $ | 164,766 | $ | 152,334 | $ | 200,674 | $ | 305,696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities
|
102,961 | 95,689 | 134,556 | 153,857 | 202,891 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current ratio
|
2.0 to 1 | 1.7 to 1 | 1.1 to 1 | 1.3 to 1 | 1.5 to 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital
|
$ | 101,185 | $ | 69,077 | $ | 17,778 | $ | 46,817 | $ | 102,805 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventories
|
42,734 | 31,925 | 36,262 | 50,149 | 104,316 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipmentnet
|
112,495 | 122,481 | 148,632 | 191,958 | 224,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
522,177 | 482,250 | 490,032 | 567,931 | 672,929 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term notes payable
|
3,311 | | | | 7,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
94,150 | 75,880 | 67,000 | 125,013 | 178,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations, including long-term debt
|
105,669 | 87,013 | 78,501 | 132,287 | 189,069 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
310,704 | 294,191 | 265,020 | 242,873 | 246,357 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding (000s)
|
35,909 | 36,067 | 34,101 | 30,902 | 27,781 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity (book value) per share
|
$ | 8.65 | $ | 8.16 | $ | 7.77 | $ | 7.86 | $ | 8.87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock price range
|
$ | 15.85-$9.90 | $ | 14.94-$4.90 | $ | 19.56-$3.65 | $ | 47.88-$13.49 | $ | 82.75-$31.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of employees
|
4,487 | 5,041 | 5,313 | 5,837 | 9,008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shareholders at year end
|
1,628 | 1,527 | 1,585 | 1,549 | 1,492 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CTS CORPORATION
37
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
CTS
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
As of December 31, 2004
CTS Corporation (Registrant), an Indiana corporation
Subsidiaries:
CTS Corporation, a Delaware corporation
CTS of Panama, Inc., a Republic of Panama corporation |
CTS Components Taiwan, Ltd., a Taiwan, Republic of China corporation |
CTS Electro de Matamoros, S.A., 1 a Republic of Mexico corporation |
CTS Japan, Inc., a Japan corporation |
CTS International B.V., a Netherlands corporation |
CTS Singapore Pte., Ltd., a Republic of Singapore corporation |
CTS Electronics Hong Kong, Ltd., 1 a Hong Kong corporation |
CTS (Tianjin) Electronics Company, Ltd., a Peoples Republic of China corporation |
CTS Electronics Dongguan, Ltd., a Peoples Republic of China corporation |
CTS of Canada Holding Company, a Province of Nova Scotia (Canada) corporation
CTS of Canada G.P., Ltd., a Province of Ontario (Canada) corporation |
CTS of Canada L.P., a Province of Ontario (Canada) limited partnership 2
CTS of Canada Co., a Province of Nova Scotia (Canada) corporation |
CTS Corporation U.K., Ltd., a Scotland corporation |
CTS Printex, Inc., a California corporation
CTS Communications Components, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Dynamics Corporation of America, a New York corporation
International Electronic Research Corporation, a California corporation |
LTB Investment Corporation, a Delaware corporation |
Corporations whose names are indented are subsidiaries of the preceding non-indented corporations. Except as indicated, each of the above subsidiaries is wholly-owned by its parent company. Operations of all subsidiaries and divisions are consolidated in the financial statements filed.
1 Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of stock is owned of record by nominee shareholders pursuant to national laws regarding resident or nominee ownership.
2 CTS of Canada, L.P., is a limited partnership formed by CTS of Canada Holding Co. and CTS of Canada G.P., Ltd.
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-117826, 333-88448, 333-72146 and 333-90697) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-116287) of CTS Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2005 relating to the financial statements, the financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
I, Donald K. Schwanz, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CTS Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statement for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Donald K. Schwanz | ||
|
|||
Donald K. Schwanz, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
I, Vinod M. Khilnani, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CTS Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statement for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani | ||
|
|||
Vinod M. Khilnani
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
In connection with the annual report of CTS Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of such officers knowledge:
(1) |
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Donald K. Schwanz |
Donald K. Schwanz | |
Chairman, President and | |
Chief Executive Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CTS Corporation and will be retained by CTS Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
In connection with the annual report of CTS Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of such officers knowledge:
(1) |
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani |
Vinod M. Khilnani | |
Sr. Vice President and | |
Chief Financial Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CTS Corporation and will be retained by CTS Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
CTS Corporation
Form 10-K 2004
CTS FAILURE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE SMTEK INTERNATIONAL, INC. ON A TIMELY BASIS INTO CTS OPERATIONS COULD REDUCE CTS PROFITABILITY.
CTS expects that the acquisition of SMTEK International, Inc. will result in certain synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects. CTS, however, may never realize these expected synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects. CTS may experience increased competition that limits its ability to expand its business, CTS may not be able to capitalize on expected business opportunities including retaining SMTEKs current customers, assumptions underlying estimates of expected cost savings may be inaccurate, or general industry and business conditions may deteriorate. In addition, integrating operations will require significant efforts and expenses on the part of both CTS and SMTEK. Personnel may leave or be terminated because of the merger. CTS management may have its attention diverted while trying to integrate SMTEK. If these factors limit CTS ability to integrate the operations of SMTEK successfully or on a timely basis, CTS expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies expected to result from the merger, may not be met. In addition, CTS growth and operating strategies for SMTEKs business may be different from the strategies that SMTEK currently is pursuing.
THE PRICE OF CTS COMMON STOCK HAS BEEN VOLATILE AND MAY CONTINUE TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN LOSSES FOR INVESTORS.
The market price for CTS common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.
From January 1, 2002 to March 1, 2005, the sale price of CTS common stock ranged from a low of $3.65 per share to a high of $19.56 per share. CTS common stock may continue to be subject to fluctuations as a result of a variety of factors, including factors beyond its control. These include:
| changing conditions in CTS industries and its customers businesses such as competition, demand for products and services, and technological advances; |
| changes in CTS revenues and earnings, including changes as a result of restructuring programs; |
| changes in market valuations of related companies; |
| announcements by CTS or its competitors of new products or technical innovations or of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures; |
| general conditions in equity markets, particularly in CTS industries; |
| general U.S. and worldwide economic conditions; |
| changes in CTS customer base, including any loss of a major customer, a significant increase or decrease in business from a major customer or changes in CTS contracts with customers; |
| introduction and market acceptance of CTS customers new products and changes in demand for CTS customers existing products; |
| effectiveness in managing CTS manufacturing processes and related assets, including its inventory and fixed assets; |
| adverse or unfavorable publicity regarding CTS or its products or services; |
| additions or departures of key personnel; |
| changes in financial estimates by securities analysts and deviations in revenues or earnings from levels expected by securities analysts; |
| future sales of CTS common stock. |
CTS may fail to meet expectations of its shareholders or of analysts at some time in the future, and its stock price could decline as a result. In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of CTS common stock in the public market or the appearance that these shares are available for sale could adversely affect the market price for CTS common stock.
1
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS COULD DELAY, DETER OR PREVENT A CHANGE IN CONTROL OF CTS EVEN IF THE CHANGE IN CONTROL WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO CTS SHAREHOLDERS.
CTS is an Indiana corporation subject to Indiana state law. Some provisions of Indiana law could interfere with or restrict takeover bids or other change in control events affecting CTS. One statutory provision prohibits, except under specified circumstances, CTS from engaging in any mergers, sale of assets, recapitalizations and reverse stock splits with any shareholder who owns 10% or more of CTS common stock or any affiliate of the shareholder. Also, provisions in CTS articles of incorporation, bylaws, and other agreements to which CTS is a party, could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of CTS, even if a change in control would be beneficial to shareholders. CTS has opted out of Indianas control share acquisition provisions, which restrict the voting rights of shares acquired in transactions which cause the beneficial owner of the shares to exceed specified ownership thresholds. CTS could, however, by action of its board of directors, elect to have those provisions apply.
In addition, CTS has a shareholder rights agreement that under certain circumstances would significantly impair the ability of third parties to acquire control of CTS without prior approval of CTS board of directors. In addition, CTS articles of incorporation allow it to issue up to an additional 22.3 million shares of common stock and 25.0 million shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval. CTS board of directors has the authority to determine the price and terms under which the additional common or preferred stock may be issued. Issuance of this common and preferred stock could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of CTS.
BECAUSE CTS CURRENTLY DERIVES A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF ITS REVENUES FROM A SMALL NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS, ANY DECREASE IN ORDERS FROM THESE CUSTOMERS COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
CTS depends on a small number of customers for a large portion of its business, and changes in the level of its customers orders have, in the past, had a significant impact on its results of operations. CTS 15 largest customers represent a substantial portion of its sales, approximately 69% of net sales in 2004, 71% of net sales in 2003 and 73% of net sales in 2002. CTS two largest customers are Hewlett-Packard Company and Motorola, Inc., which represented approximately 33% and 13%, respectively, of its net sales in 2004. If a major customer significantly cancels, delays or reduces the amount of business it does with CTS, there could be an adverse effect on CTS business, financial condition and operating results. Such adverse effect likely would be material if one of CTS largest customers significantly reduced its amount of business. Significant pricing and margin pressures exerted by a key customer could also materially adversely affect CTS operating results. In addition, CTS generates significant accounts receivable from sales to its major customers. If one or more of CTS largest customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay or were to delay payment for services, CTS business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
CTS CUSTOMERS HAVE CANCELED AND MAY IN THE FUTURE CANCEL THEIR ORDERS, CHANGE PRODUCTION QUANTITIES OR LOCATIONS OR DELAY PRODUCTION.
CTS generally does not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from its customers, and has often experienced reduced lead times in customer orders. Customers cancel their orders, change production quantities and delay production for a number of reasons. Uncertain economic and geopolitical conditions have resulted, and may continue to result, in some of CTS customers delaying the delivery of some of the products CTS manufactures for them and placing purchase orders for lower volumes of products than previously anticipated. Cancellations, reductions or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers have harmed, and may continue to harm, CTS results of operations by reducing the volumes of products manufactured by CTS, as well as by causing a delay in the recovery of its expenditures for inventory in preparation for customer orders and lower asset utilization resulting in lower gross margins.
In addition, customers may require that manufacturing of their products be transitioned from one facility to another to achieve cost and other objectives. Such transfers result in inefficiencies and costs due to resulting excess capacity and overhead at one facility and capacity constraints and the inability to fulfill all orders at another. In addition, CTS makes significant decisions, including determining the levels of orders that it will seek and accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, personnel needs and other resource requirements, based on its estimates of customer requirements. The short-term nature of CTS customers commitments and the changes in demand for their products reduce CTS ability to estimate accurately future customer requirements. This makes it difficult to schedule production and maximize utilization of CTS manufacturing capacity. Anticipated orders may not materialize and delivery schedules may be deferred as a result of changes in demand for CTS products or its customers products. CTS often increases staffing and capacity, and incurs other expenses to meet the anticipated demand of its customers, which cause reductions in its gross margins if customer orders are delayed or canceled. On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production, which may stress CTS resources and reduce margins. CTS may not have sufficient capacity at any given time to meet its customers demands. In addition, because many of CTS costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed over the short term, a reduction in customer demand harms its gross profit and operating income until such time as adjustments can be made to activity or operating levels and structural costs.
2
BECAUSE CTS DERIVES A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF ITS REVENUES FROM CUSTOMERS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRIES, IT IS SUSCEPTIBLE TO TRENDS AND FACTORS AFFECTING THOSE INDUSTRIES AS WELL AS THE SUCCESS OF ITS CUSTOMERS PRODUCTS.
Net sales to the automotive, computer and communications industries represent a substantial portion of CTS revenues. Factors negatively affecting these industries and the demand for products also negatively affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results. Any adverse occurrence, including industry slowdown, recession, political instability, costly or constraining regulations, armed hostilities, terrorism, excessive inflation, prolonged disruptions in one or more of CTS customers production schedules or labor disturbances, that results in significant decline in the volume of sales in these industries, or in an overall downturn in the business and operations of CTS customers in these industries, could materially adversely affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results. For example, the trend toward consolidation in the computer and communications industries could result in a lower level of acceptance of CTS products, reduced product requirements, purchasing delays by combined entities or the loss of one or more customers. Also, the automotive industry is generally highly unionized and some of CTS customers have, in the past, experienced labor disruptions. Furthermore, the automotive industry is highly cyclical in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, consumer preferences and interest rates.
CTS customers are primarily original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in the automotive, computer and communications industries. CTS future sales are dependent on the success of its customers. CTS customers may discontinue or modify their products containing products that CTS manufactures or develop products requiring new manufacturing processes. In addition, the computer and communications industries are subject to rapid technological change and changes in demand for CTS products. If CTS customers are unable to develop products that keep pace with the changing technological environment, its customers products could lose market acceptance, and the demand for CTS products could decline significantly. If CTS is unable to offer technologically advanced, easily adaptable and cost-effective products in response to changing customer requirements, demand for its products will decline.
CTS MAY BE UNABLE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY AGAINST COMPETITORS IN ITS COMPONENTS AND SENSORS SEGMENT.
CTS components and sensors segment operates in highly competitive industries that are characterized by price erosion and rapid technological change. CTS competes against many domestic and foreign companies, some of which have substantially greater manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources than CTS. Additionally, many of CTS customers are seeking to consolidate their business among one or more preferred or qualified suppliers. If any customer becomes dissatisfied with CTS prices, quality or timeliness of delivery, among other things, it could award future business or even move existing business to CTS competitors. Moreover, some of CTS customers could choose to manufacture and develop particular products themselves rather than purchase them from CTS. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share, each of which could materially adversely affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, some of CTS competitors have engaged, and may in the future engage, in merger and acquisition transactions. Consolidations by competitors are likely to create entities with increased market share, customer bases, proprietary technology, marketing expertise and sales force size. These developments may materially adversely affect CTS ability to compete against these competitors. CTS cannot assure you that its products will continue to compete successfully with its competitors products, including OEMs, many of which are significantly larger than CTS and have greater financial and other resources than CTS.
CTS IS SUBJECT TO INTENSE COMPETITION IN THE EMS INDUSTRY.
CTS competes against many providers of electronics manufacturing services. Some of its competitors have substantially greater manufacturing and financial resources and in some cases have more geographically diversified international operations than CTS. CTS competitors, such as Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Solectron, Inc., Sanmina SCI Corporation and Teradyne, Inc., include both large global EMS providers and smaller EMS companies that often have a regional, product, service or industry specific focus. CTS also faces competition from the manufacturing operations of its current and future OEM customers, which may elect to manufacture their own products internally rather than outsource the manufacturing to EMS providers. In addition, CTS could face competition in the future from other large global EMS providers, such as Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd. and Jabil Circuit, Inc., which currently provide services to some of CTS largest customers for different products, as well as competition from smaller EMS companies such as Plexus Corp., Reptron Electronics, Inc. and LaBarge, Inc. CTS may be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to price when compared to manufacturers with lower cost structures, particularly those with significant offshore facilities located where labor and other costs are lower. Competition may intensify further if more companies enter the markets in which CTS operates. CTS failure to compete effectively could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and operating results.
3
CTS MAY BE UNABLE TO KEEP PACE WITH RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES THAT COULD MAKE SOME OF ITS PRODUCTS OR PROCESSES OBSOLETE BEFORE IT REALIZES A RETURN ON ITS INVESTMENT.
The technologies relating to some of CTS products have undergone, and are continuing to undergo, rapid and significant changes. Specifically, end markets for electronic components and assemblies are characterized by technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in customer requirements and emerging industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render CTS existing products obsolete and unmarketable before CTS can recover any or all of its research, development and commercialization expenses on capital investments. Furthermore, the life cycles of CTS products and the products CTS manufactures for others vary, may change and are difficult to estimate.
CTS future success will depend upon its ability to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements on a timely basis that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards and address increasingly sophisticated requirements of CTS customers. CTS has incurred, and expects to continue to incur, expenses typical of the electronics industry associated with research and development activities and the introduction and promotion of new products. There can be no assurance that the expenses incurred will not exceed research and development cost estimates or that new products will achieve market acceptance and generate sales sufficient to offset development costs. CTS also cannot provide assurance you that it will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of these new products or product enhancements or that CTS new products or product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. There can be no assurance that products or technologies developed by others will not render CTS products non-competitive or obsolete. If CTS is unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and market new products or product enhancements in a timely and cost-effective manner, CTS business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
CTS SELLS PRODUCTS TO CUSTOMERS IN CYCLICAL INDUSTRIES, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT DOWNTURNS THAT COULD MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
CTS sells products to customers in cyclical industries, which have experienced economic and industry downturns. These markets for CTS electronic components and sensors and electronics manufacturing services products have softened in the past and may again soften in the future. CTS incurred sizeable net losses in each of 2001 and 2002 of approximately $45.4 million and $17.9 million, respectively, due in part to economic and industry downturns. CTS may face reduced end-customer demand, underutilization of CTS manufacturing capacity, changes in CTS revenue mix and other factors that could adversely affect CTS results of operations in the near term. CTS cannot predict whether it will achieve profitability in future periods.
Deterioration of revenues and earnings, beyond current levels, could have a negative effect on CTS business, financial condition and operating results. This could also have a negative effect on the price of CTS common stock and could also make it difficult for CTS to service its debt. Violation of the covenants in CTS credit facility could require substantial fees to CTS banks until the violation is corrected. In the event the violation cannot be corrected, all of the indebtedness under CTS credit facility, its 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures and notes, as well as certain other indebtedness, may be accelerated. If CTS indebtedness is accelerated, CTS cannot be certain that it will have sufficient funds to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that it will have the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to CTS or at all.
CTS OPERATING RESULTS VARY SIGNIFICANTLY FROM PERIOD TO PERIOD.
CTS experiences fluctuations in its operating results. Some of the principal factors that contribute to these fluctuations are:
| changes in demand for CTS products; |
| CTS effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes, costs and timing of CTS component purchases so that components are available when needed for production, while mitigating the risks of purchasing inventory in excess of immediate production needs; |
| the degree to which CTS is able to utilize its available manufacturing capacity; |
| changes in the cost and availability of components, which often occur in the electronics manufacturing industry and which affect CTS margins and its ability to meet delivery schedules; |
| general economic and served industry conditions; |
| local conditions and events that may affect CTS production volumes, such as labor conditions and political instability. |
In addition, due to the significant differences in the operating income margins in CTS two reporting segments, the mix of sales between CTS components and sensors segment and CTS EMS segment affect CTS operating results from period to period. In addition, although CTS restructuring activities and relocation of some of its manufacturing operations to Asia should result in improved operating income margins in CTS components and sensors segment, CTS can provide no assurances that this will occur.
4
CTS MAY FURTHER RESTRUCTURE ITS OPERATIONS, WHICH MAY MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
In 2001, 2002 and 2003, CTS recorded restructuring and impairment charges of $40.0 million, $18.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively, relating to costs incurred to effect operational improvements and related organizational realignments, primarily in CTS components and sensors segment. CTS completed these restructuring actions, including the relocation of certain manufacturing operations, in 2003. CTS may incur additional restructuring and impairment charges in the future if circumstances warrant. If CTS restructures its operations in the future and is unsuccessful in implementing restructuring plans, CTS may experience disruptions in its operations and higher ongoing costs, which may materially adversely affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results.
CTS FACES RISKS RELATING TO ITS INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.
Because CTS has significant international operations, its operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by economic, political, health, regulatory and other factors existing in foreign countries in which CTS operates. CTS international operations are subject to inherent risks, which may materially adversely affect CTS, including:
| political and economic instability in countries in which CTS products are manufactured; |
| expropriation or the imposition of government controls; |
| changes in government regulations; |
| export license requirements; |
| trade restrictions; |
| earnings expatriation restrictions; |
| exposure to different legal standards; |
| less favorable intellectual property laws; |
| health conditions and standards; |
| currency controls; |
| fluctuations in exchange rates; |
| increases in the duties and taxes CTS pays; |
| high levels of inflation or deflation; |
| greater difficulty in collecting CTS accounts receivable and longer payment cycles; |
| changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing CTS international operations; |
| limitations on insurance coverage against geopolitical risks, natural disasters and business operations; |
| communication among and management of international operations. |
In addition, these same factors may also place CTS at a competitive disadvantage to some of CTS foreign competitors.
To respond to competitive pressures and customer requirements, CTS may further expand internationally at low cost locations, particularly in Asia. If CTS continues to expand in these locations, CTS may incur additional capital expenditures. CTS cannot assure you that it will realize the anticipated strategic benefits of CTS international operations or that its international operations will contribute positively to, and not adversely affect, CTS business, financial condition and operating results.
Furthermore, because a significant portion of CTS products are manufactured in Asia, primarily in China and Taiwan, any conflict or uncertainty in these countries, including public health or safety concerns, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), or natural disasters, such as earthquakes, could have a material adverse effect on CTS business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, if the government of any country in which CTS products are manufactured or sold sets technical standards for products made in or imported into their country that are not widely shared, some of CTS customers may suspend imports of their products into that country, require manufacturers in that country to manufacture products with different technical standards or disrupt cross-border manufacturing partnerships, which, in each case, could materially adversely affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results.
5
CTS IS EXPOSED TO FLUCTUATIONS IN FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES THAT HAVE ADVERSELY AFFECTED, AND MAY CONTINUE TO ADVERSELY AFFECT, CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
CTS transacts business in various foreign countries. CTS presents its consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars, but a portion of CTS revenues and expenditures are transacted in other currencies. As a result, CTS is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies. CTS has currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Volatility in the exchange rates between the foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar could harm CTS business, financial condition and operating results. Furthermore, to the extent CTS sells its products in foreign markets, currency fluctuations may result in CTS products becoming too expensive for foreign customers. For example, CTS EMS business located in the United Kingdom sells primarily in U.S. dollars while most of the operating expenses and some material purchases are made in UK pound sterling. Accordingly, when the U.S. dollar weakens against the UK pound sterling, CTS EMS segment operating results generally worsen. As the U.S. dollar strengthens against the UK pound sterling and the Euro, CTS components and sensors segment operating results generally worsen. CTS also manufactures products in China, most of which CTS sells in U.S. dollars. An appreciation of the Chinese RMB against the U.S. dollar would increase CTS expenses when translated into U.S. dollars.
IF CTS IS UNABLE TO PROTECT ITS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OR IT INFRINGES, OR IS ALLEGED TO INFRINGE, ON ANOTHER PERSONS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
The success of CTS business depends, in part, upon CTS ability to protect trade secrets, copyrights and patents, obtain or license patents and operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights of others. CTS relies on a combination of trade secrets, copyrights, patents, nondisclosure agreements and technical measures to protect CTS proprietary rights in its products and technology. The steps taken by CTS in this regard may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation of CTS technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which CTS operates do not protect CTS proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Although CTS continues to evaluate and implement protective measures, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful. CTS inability to protect its intellectual property rights could diminish or eliminate the competitive advantages that CTS derives from its technology, cause CTS to lose sales or otherwise harm CTS business.
CTS believes that patents will continue to play an important role in its business. However, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in securing patents for claims in any pending patent application or that any issued patent will provide CTS with any competitive advantage. CTS also cannot provide assurance that the patents will not be challenged by third parties or that the patents of others will not materially adversely affect CTS ability to do business.
CTS may become involved in litigation in the future to protect its intellectual property or because others may allege that CTS infringes on their intellectual property. These claims and any resulting lawsuit could subject CTS to liability for damages and invalidate CTS intellectual property rights. If an infringement claim is successfully asserted by a holder of intellectual property rights, CTS may be required to cease marketing or selling certain products, pay a penalty for past infringement and spend significant time and money to develop a non-infringing product or process or to obtain licenses for the technology, process or information from the holder. CTS may not be successful in the development of a non-infringing alternative, or licenses may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all, in which case CTS may lose sales and profits. In addition, any litigation could be lengthy and costly and could materially adversely affect CTS even if CTS is successful in the litigation.
CTS IS SUBJECT TO A VARIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT EXPOSE CTS TO POTENTIAL FINANCIAL LIABILITY.
CTS operations are regulated by a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental and safety laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water as well as the handling, storage and disposal of these materials. These laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as well as analogous state and foreign laws. Compliance with these environmental laws is a major consideration for CTS because it uses hazardous materials in its manufacturing processes. If CTS violates environmental laws or regulations, CTS could be held liable for substantial fines, damages, and costs of remedial actions. CTS environmental permits could also be revoked or modified, which could require CTS to cease or limit production at one or more of its facilities, thereby materially adversely affecting CTS business, financial condition and operating results. Environmental laws and requirements, including environmental laws in the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions, have generally become more stringent over time and could continue to do so, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with any violation, which also could materially affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, because CTS is a generator of hazardous wastes, even if CTS fully complies with applicable environmental laws and requirements, CTS may be subject to financial exposure for costs, including costs of investigation and any remediation, associated with contaminated sites at which hazardous substances from CTS operations have been stored, treated or disposed of. CTS may also be subject to exposure for such costs at sites that CTS currently owns or operates or formerly owned or operated. Such exposure may be joint and several, so that CTS may be held responsible for more than its share of the contamination or even for the entire contamination.
CTS has been notified by the Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups that CTS is or may be a potentially responsible party regarding hazardous substances at several sites not owned or operated by CTS, as well as several sites that CTS owns. Although CTS estimates its potential liability with respect to environmental violations or alleged violations and other environmental liabilities and reserves for such matters, CTS cannot assure you that its reserves will be sufficient to cover the actual costs that it incurs as a result of these matters. CTS also cannot assure you that additional contamination will not be found in the future, either at sites currently known to CTS or at other sites. Any liability CTS may have for such matters could materially adversely affect CTS business, financial condition and operating results.
6
CTS INTENDS TO EXPLORE ACQUISITIONS, JOINT VENTURES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS THAT COMPLEMENT OR EXPAND CTS BUSINESS. CTS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THESE TRANSACTIONS AND THESE TRANSACTIONS, IF EXECUTED, POSE SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND MAY MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
CTS intends to explore opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that could complement, enhance or expand CTS current business or product lines or that might otherwise offer CTS growth opportunities. CTS may have difficulty finding these opportunities or, if CTS does identify these opportunities, CTS may not be able to complete the transactions for reasons including a failure to secure financing. Any transactions that CTS is able to identify and complete may involve a number of risks, including:
| the diversion of CTS managements attention from CTS existing business to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired or combined business or joint venture; |
| possible adverse effects on CTS operating results during the integration process; |
| CTS possible inability to achieve the intended objectives of the transaction. |
In addition, CTS may not be able to successfully or profitably integrate, operate, maintain and manage CTS newly acquired operations or employees. CTS may not be able to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, and this may lead to operational inefficiencies. In addition, future acquisitions may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of additional debt.
CTS MAY EXPERIENCE RAW MATERIAL SHORTAGES AND SHORTAGES OF REQUIRED ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, WHICH COULD CAUSE CTS TO DELAY SHIPMENTS TO CUSTOMERS AND REDUCE CTS BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING RESULTS.
In the past, from time to time, there have been shortages in certain raw materials used in the manufacture of CTS components and sensors and certain electronic components purchased by CTS and incorporated into assemblies and subassemblies. Unanticipated raw material or electronic component shortages may prevent CTS from making scheduled shipments to customers. CTS inability to make scheduled shipments could cause CTS to experience a shortfall in revenue, increase CTS costs and adversely affect CTS relationship with affected customers and CTS reputation as a reliable service provider. Raw material and electronic component shortages may also increase CTS cost of goods sold because CTS may be required to pay higher prices for raw materials or electronic components in short supply and order these raw materials or electronic components in greater quantities to compensate for variable delivery times. As a result, raw material or electronic component shortages could adversely affect CTS operating results for a particular period due to the resulting revenue shortfall and increased costs.
CTS INDEBTEDNESS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT ITS FINANCIAL HEALTH.
As of January 31, 2005, CTS debt balance was $97.3 million, consisting of $60.0 million of 2.125% convertible senior subordinated notes, $25.0 million of 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures, $1.1 million of borrowings under CTS revolving credit facility and $11.2 million of borrowings under foreign credit facilities. The level of CTS indebtedness could, among other things:
| increase CTS vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions, including recessions; |
| require CTS to use cash flow from operations to service its indebtedness, thereby reducing its ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts and other expenses; |
| limit CTS flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industries in which it operates; |
| place CTS at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less indebtedness; |
| limit CTS ability to borrow additional funds that may be needed to operate and expand its business. |
7
CTS CREDIT FACILITY AND THE AGREEMENTS GOVERNING CTS 6 1/2% CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES CONTAIN PROVISIONS THAT COULD MATERIALLY RESTRICT CTS BUSINESS.
CTS credit facility contains a number of significant covenants that, among other things, limit CTS ability to:
| dispose of assets; |
| incur additional debt (including pursuant to capital leases); |
| guarantee third-party obligations; |
| repay other debt or amend subordinated debt instruments; |
| create liens on assets; |
| make investments, loans or advances; |
| make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations; |
| make capital expenditures; and |
| engage in certain transactions with CTS subsidiaries and affiliates. |
In addition, under CTS credit facility, CTS is required to meet a number of financial ratios and tests. The agreements governing CTS 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures contain covenants that, among other things, limit CTS ability to:
| pay dividends on, redeem or repurchase capital stock; |
| make payments with respect to any indebtedness that ranks junior to CTS 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures; |
| engage in certain transactions with CTS subsidiaries and affiliates. |
The restrictions contained in CTS credit facility and in the agreements governing CTS 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures could limit CTS ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet capital needs or could otherwise restrict CTS activities or business plans. These restrictions could adversely affect CTS ability to finance its operations, strategic acquisitions, investments or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that could be in CTS interests.
CTS ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond its control. If CTS breaches any of these covenants or restrictions, it could result in an event of default under CTS credit facility, the agreements governing CTS 6 1/2% convertible subordinated debentures, the indenture for the notes or documents governing any other existing or future indebtedness. A default, if not cured or waived, may permit acceleration of CTS indebtedness. In addition, CTS lenders could terminate their commitments to make further extensions of credit under CTS credit facility. If CTS indebtedness is accelerated, CTS cannot be certain that it will have sufficient funds to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that it will have the ability to refinance accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to CTS or at all.
LOSS OF CTS KEY MANAGEMENT AND OTHER PERSONNEL, OR AN INABILITY TO ATTRACT KEY MANAGEMENT AND OTHER PERSONNEL, COULD MATERIALLY AFFECT CTS BUSINESS.
CTS depends on its senior executive officers and other key personnel to run its business. CTS does not have long-term retention contracts with its key personnel. The loss of any of these officers or other key personnel could adversely affect CTS operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology is at times intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion of CTS business could hinder CTS ability to conduct research activities successfully and develop marketable products.
8