Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
 
OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-815
 
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
 
51-0014090
(State or other Jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)
 
Identification No.)
1007 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19898
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(302) 774-1000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   x    No   o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files.)  Yes   x    No   o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer  x
 
Accelerated Filer o
 
 
 
Non-Accelerated Filer  o
 
Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o    No   x
 
The Registrant had 937,039,000 shares (excludes 87,041,000 shares of treasury stock) of common stock, $0.30 par value, outstanding at April 16, 2012.
 
 

Table of Contents

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

Table of Contents
 
The terms “DuPont” or the “company” as used herein refer to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, or to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, as the context may indicate. 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 
 


2
Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Income Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Net sales
$
11,230

$
10,034

Other income, net
26

25

Total
11,256

10,059

Cost of goods sold and other operating charges
7,527

6,831

Selling, general and administrative expenses
1,169

1,027

Research and development expense
505

399

Interest expense
114

100

Total
9,315

8,357

Income before income taxes
1,941

1,702

Provision for income taxes
441

258

Net income
1,500

1,444

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
12

13

Net income attributable to DuPont
$
1,488

$
1,431

Basic earnings per share of common stock
$
1.59

$
1.54

Diluted earnings per share of common stock
$
1.57

$
1.52

Dividends per share of common stock
$
0.41

$
0.41

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.



3
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Net income
$
1,500

$
1,444

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
 
 
      Cumulative translation adjustment
170

44

      Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings:
 
 
      Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(2
)
8

      Clearance of hedge results to earnings
(32
)
27

      Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(34
)
35

      Pension benefit plans:
 
 
      Net loss
(23
)
—

      Prior service cost
22

—

      Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
                Amortization of prior service cost
4

4

                Amortization of loss
219

153

      Pension benefit plans, net
222

157

      Other benefit plans:
 
 
      Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
                Amortization of prior service benefit
(30
)
(30
)
                Amortization of loss
22

15

      Other benefit plans, net
(8
)
(15
)
      Net unrealized gain on securities
1

1

Other comprehensive income, before tax
351

222

      Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
(64
)
(62
)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
287

160

Comprehensive income
1,787

1,604

      Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
14

12

Comprehensive income attributable to DuPont
$
1,773

$
1,592


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.


4
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share)  
 
March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Assets
 

 

Current assets
 

 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
3,410

$
3,586

Marketable securities
191

433

Accounts and notes receivable, net
8,626

6,022

Inventories
6,616

7,195

Prepaid expenses
260

151

Deferred income taxes
706

671

Total current assets
19,809

18,058

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
   (March 31, 2012 - $19,695; December 31, 2011 - $19,349)
13,395

13,412

Goodwill
5,443

5,413

Other intangible assets
5,410

5,413

Investment in affiliates
1,121

1,117

Deferred income taxes
4,052

4,067

Other assets
993

1,012

Total
$
50,223

$
48,492

Liabilities and Equity
 

 

Current liabilities
 

 

Accounts payable
$
4,180

$
4,816

Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations
3,593

817

Income taxes
585

255

Other accrued liabilities
4,178

5,297

Total current liabilities
12,536

11,185

Long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations
11,232

11,736

Other liabilities
14,935

15,508

Deferred income taxes
1,093

1,001

Total liabilities
39,796

39,430

Commitments and contingent liabilities




Stockholders’ equity
 

 

Preferred stock
237

237

Common stock, $0.30 par value; 1,800,000,000 shares authorized;
   Issued at March 31, 2012 - 1,023,888,000; December 31, 2011 - 1,013,164,000
307

304

Additional paid-in capital
10,086

10,107

Reinvested earnings
14,522

13,422

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(8,465
)
(8,750
)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost
   (87,041,000 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011)
(6,727
)
(6,727
)
Total DuPont stockholders’ equity
9,960

8,593

Noncontrolling interests
467

469

Total equity
10,427

9,062

Total
$
50,223

$
48,492

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.

5
Table of Contents

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Operating activities
 

 

Net income
$
1,500

$
1,444

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used for operating activities:
 

 

Depreciation
349

294

Amortization of intangible assets
106

67

Contributions to pension plans
(614
)
(105
)
Other noncash charges and credits - net
311

385

Change in operating assets and liabilities - net
(3,529
)
(3,569
)
Cash used for operating activities
(1,877
)
(1,484
)
 
 
 
Investing activities
 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(301
)
(323
)
Investments in affiliates
(2
)
(12
)
Proceeds from sales of assets - net of cash sold
4

7

Net decrease in short-term financial instruments
248

1,585

Forward exchange contract settlements
(87
)
(210
)
Change in restricted cash
—

(1,991
)
Other investing activities - net
(18
)
(21
)
Cash used for investing activities
(156
)
(965
)
 
 
 
Financing activities
 

 

Dividends paid to stockholders
(386
)
(383
)
Net increase in borrowings
2,278

1,991

Prepayment / Repurchase of common stock
(400
)
(272
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
389

605

Other financing activities - net
(36
)
(12
)
Cash provided by financing activities
1,845

1,929

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
12

53

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
$
(176
)
$
(467
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
3,586

4,263

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
3,410

$
3,796

 
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7.


6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)


Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods have been included.  Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of results for a full year.  These interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 , collectively referred to as the “2011 Annual Report”.  The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the company and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained, as well as variable interest entities for which DuPont is the primary beneficiary.  Certain reclassifications of prior year data have been made to conform to current year classifications.

Note 2.  Other Income, Net  
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Cozaar ® /Hyzaar ®  income
$
25

$
48

Royalty income
41

31

Interest income
23

28

Equity in earnings of affiliates, excluding exchange gains/losses
10

48

Net gain on sales of assets
5

6

Net exchange losses 1
(80
)
(143
)
Miscellaneous income and expenses, net 2
2

7

Total
$
26

$
25

 

1  
The company routinely uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The objective of this program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies in order to minimize, on an after-tax basis, the effects of exchange rate changes on net monetary asset positions. The net pre-tax exchange gains and losses are recorded in other income, net and the related tax impact is recorded in provision for income taxes on the interim Consolidated Income Statements.
2   
Miscellaneous income and expenses, net, generally includes interest items, insurance recoveries, litigation settlements and other items.

Note 3.  Provision for Income Taxes  
In the first quarter 2012, the company recorded a tax provision of $441 , including $36 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations.

In the first quarter 2011, the company recorded a tax provision of $258 , including $135 of tax benefit primarily associated with the company’s policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations.

Each year the company files hundreds of tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the taxing authorities. Positions challenged by the taxing authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the company’s financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. It is reasonably possible that changes to the company’s global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant, however, due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made.


7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 4.  Earnings Per Share of Common Stock  
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Numerator:
 
 
Net income attributable to DuPont
$
1,488

$
1,431

Preferred dividends
(3
)
(3
)
Net income available to common stockholders
$
1,485

$
1,428

 
 
 
Denominator:
 
 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - Basic
933,910,000

924,897,000

Dilutive effect of the company’s employee compensation plans
10,328,000

16,012,000

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted
944,238,000

940,909,000

 
The following average number of stock options were antidilutive, and therefore, were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Average number of stock options
10,724,000

—

 
The change in the average number of stock options that were antidilutive in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period last year was primarily due to changes in the company’s average stock price.

Note 5. Inventories  
 
March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011
Finished products
$
4,497

$
4,541

Semifinished products
1,796

2,293

Raw materials, stores and supplies
1,239

1,262

 
7,532

8,096

Adjustment of inventories to a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis
(916
)
(901
)
Total
$
6,616

$
7,195

 

8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 6.  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets  
There were no significant changes in goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets by major class are as follows: 
 
March 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
 
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Intangible assets subject to amortization (Definite-lived):
 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer lists
$
1,859

$
(248
)
$
1,611

$
1,841

$
(220
)
$
1,621

Patents
514

(84
)
430

518

(77
)
441

Purchased and licensed technology
1,920

(934
)
986

1,854

(878
)
976

Trademarks
57

(26
)
31

57

(25
)
32

Other 1
326

(149
)
177

330

(151
)
179

 
4,676

(1,441
)
3,235

4,600

(1,351
)
3,249

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets not subject to amortization(Indefinite-lived):
 

 

 

 

 

 

In-process research and development
70

—

70

70

—

70

Microbial cell factories 2
306

—

306

306

—

306

Pioneer germplasm 3
975

—

975

975

—

975

Trademarks/tradenames
824

—

824

813

—

813

 
2,175

—

2,175

2,164

—

2,164

Total
$
6,851

$
(1,441
)
$
5,410

$
6,764

$
(1,351
)
$
5,413


1   
Primarily consists of sales and grower networks, marketing and manufacturing alliances and noncompetition agreements.
2   
Microbial cell factories, derived from natural microbes, are used to sustainably produce enzymes, peptides and chemicals using natural metabolic processes. The company recognized the microbial cell factories as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Danisco. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life.
3   
Pioneer germplasm is the pool of genetic source material and body of knowledge gained from the development and delivery stage of plant breeding. The company recognized germplasm as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Pioneer. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life.       

The aggregate pre-tax amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets was $106 and $67 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 , and 2011, respectively.  The estimated aggregate pre-tax amortization expense for 2012 and each of the next five years is approximately $338 , $332 , $348 , $351 , $308 and $180 .

Note 7.  Commitments and Contingent Liabilities  
Guarantees  
Indemnifications
In connection with acquisitions and divestitures, the company has indemnified respective parties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with these transactions and business activities prior to the completion of the transaction. The term of these indemnifications, which typically pertain to environmental, tax and product liabilities, is generally indefinite. In addition, the company indemnifies its duly elected or appointed directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, against liabilities incurred as a result of their activities for the company, such as adverse judgments relating to litigation matters. If the indemnified party were to incur a liability or have a liability increase as a result of a successful claim, pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, the company would be required to reimburse the indemnified party. The maximum amount of potential future payments is generally unlimited. The carrying amounts recorded for all indemnifications as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $105 . Although it is reasonably possible that future payments may exceed amounts accrued, due to the nature of indemnified items, it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential loss or range of loss. No assets are held as collateral and no specific recourse provisions exist.

In connection with the 2004 sale of the majority of the net assets of Textiles and Interiors, the company indemnified the purchasers, subsidiaries of Koch Industries, Inc. (INVISTA), against certain liabilities primarily related to taxes, legal and environmental matters and other representations and warranties under the Purchase and Sale Agreement. The estimated fair value of the indemnity

9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

obligations under the Purchase and Sale Agreement was $70 and was included in the indemnifications balance of $105 at March 31, 2012 . Under the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the company's total indemnification obligation for the majority of the representations and warranties cannot exceed $1,400 . The other indemnities are not subject to this limit. In March 2008, INVISTA filed suit in the Southern District of New York alleging that certain representations and warranties in the Purchase and Sale Agreement were breached and, therefore, that DuPont is obligated to indemnify it. DuPont disagrees with the extent and value of INVISTA's claims. DuPont has not changed its estimate of its total indemnification obligation under the Purchase and Sale Agreement as a result of the lawsuit. A 2012 trial date has been set.
 
Obligations for Equity Affiliates & Others  
The company has directly guaranteed various debt obligations under agreements with third parties related to equity affiliates, customers and suppliers. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , the company had directly guaranteed $526 and $563 , respectively, of such obligations. In addition, the company had $20 relating to guarantees of historical obligations for divested subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 . These amounts represent the maximum potential amount of future (undiscounted) payments that the company could be required to make under the guarantees. The company would be required to perform on these guarantees in the event of default by the guaranteed party.

The company assesses the payment/performance risk by assigning default rates based on the duration of the guarantees. These default rates are assigned based on the external credit rating of the counterparty or through internal credit analysis and historical default history for counterparties that do not have published credit ratings. For counterparties without an external rating or available credit history, a cumulative average default rate is used.

In certain cases, the company has recourse to assets held as collateral, as well as personal guarantees from customers and suppliers. Assuming liquidation, these assets are estimated to cover approximately 53 percent of the $323 of guaranteed obligations of customers and suppliers. Set forth below are the company's guaranteed obligations at March 31, 2012 :
 
Short-Term
Long-Term
Total
Obligations for customers and suppliers 1 :
 

 

 

Bank borrowings (terms up to 5 years)
$
243

$
80

$
323

Obligations for equity affiliates 2 :
 

 

 

Bank borrowings (terms up to 2 years)
201

2

203

Total obligations for customers, suppliers and equity affiliates
444

82

526

Obligations for divested subsidiaries (terms up to 6 years)
16

4

20

Total
$
460

$
86

$
546

 
1  
Existing guarantees for customers and suppliers arose as part of contractual agreements.
2    
Existing guarantees for equity affiliates arose for liquidity needs in normal operations.

Imprelis ®  
The company has received claims and been served with multiple lawsuits, including lawsuits seeking class action status, alleging that the use of Imprelis ® herbicide caused damage to certain trees. The majority of the lawsuits seeking class actions have been consolidated in federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In August 2011, the company suspended sales of Imprelis ® and in September began a process to fairly resolve claims associated with the use of Imprelis ® . The deadline for property owners to file claims was February 1, 2012, although DuPont continues to receive claims at a significantly reduced rate which it expects to consider as part of the claims resolution process. However, the company believes that the number of unasserted claims, if any, is limited due to the fact that sales were suspended in August 2011 and the product was last applied during the 2011 spring application season.

The company has established review processes to verify and evaluate damage claims. There are several variables that impact the evaluation process including the number of trees on a property, the species of tree with reported damage, the height of the tree, the extent of damage and the possibility for trees to naturally recover over time. Upon receiving claims, DuPont verifies their accuracy and validity which often requires physical review of the property.

At March 31, 2012, DuPont had recorded charges of $225 related to the Imprelis ® matter, which included a $50 charge recorded during the first quarter 2012. It is reasonably possible that additional charges could result related to this matter. While there is a high degree of uncertainty, total charges could range as high as $575 . DuPont intends to seek recovery from its insurance carriers for costs associated with this matter in excess of $100 .

10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Litigation
The company is subject to various legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of its business including product liability, intellectual property, comm ercial, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. Except as otherwise noted, management does not anticipate their resolution will have a materially adverse effect on the company's consolidated financial position or liquidity.  However, the ultimate liabilities could be significant to results of operations in the period recognized.  
 
PFOA 
DuPont uses PFOA (collectively, perfluorooctanoic acids and its salts, including the ammonium salt), as a processing aid to manufacture fluoropolymer resins and dispersions at various sites around the world including its Washington Works plant in West Virginia.   At March 31, 2012 , DuPont has accruals of $16 related to the PFOA matters discussed below.

The accrual includes charges related to DuPont's obligations under agreements with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and voluntary commitments to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.  These obligations include surveying, sampling and testing drinking water in and around certain company sites and offering treatment or an alternative supply of drinking water if tests indicate the presence of PFOA in drinking water at or greater than the national Provisional Health Advisory.

Drinking Water Actions
In August 2001, a class action, captioned Leach v DuPont, was filed in West Virginia state court alleging that residents living near the Washington Works facility had suffered, or may suffer, deleterious health effects from exposure to PFOA in drinking water.

DuPont and attorneys for the class reached a settlement in 2004 that binds about 80,000 residents. In 2005, DuPont paid the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses of $23 and made a payment of $70 , which class counsel designated to fund a community health project.  The company is also funding a series of health studies by an independent science panel of experts (the “C8 Science Panel”) in the communities exposed to PFOA to evaluate available scientific evidence on whether any probable link exists, as defined in the settlement agreement, between exposure to PFOA and human disease.  The company expects the C8 Science Panel to complete these health studies through July 2012 at a total estimated cost of $33 . 

In December 2011, the C8 Science Panel concluded that there is a probable link, as defined in the settlement agreement, between exposure to PFOA and pregnancy-induced hypertension, which includes preeclampsia. In April 2012, the C8 Science Panel announced its probable link determinations regarding cancer and adult onset diabetes. The C8 Science Panel found a probable link between exposure to PFOA and two categories of cancer (kidney and testicular). A panel of medical experts will determine an appropriate medical monitoring protocol, if any, as a result of these findings. If a medical monitoring protocol for any of these diseases is defined, DuPont is required to fund a medical monitoring program to pay for such medical testing. Plaintiffs may pursue personal injury claims against DuPont only for those human disease(s) for which the C8 Science Panel determines a probable link exists once the C8 Science Panel completes its work. In January 2012, the company put $1 in an escrow account as required by the settlement agreement. The company will reassess its liability based on the medical monitoring panel's determination since costs are not reasonably estimable until a medical monitoring protocol, if any, is identified. The company will continue to reassess its liability based on the C8 Science Panel's future probable link findings, if any, and associated medical monitoring protocols, if any. Under the settlement agreement, the company's total obligation to pay for medical monitoring cannot exceed $235 . In addition, the company must continue to provide state-of-the-art water treatment systems designed to reduce the level of PFOA in water to six area water districts, including the Little Hocking Water Association (LHWA), and private well users.

An Ohio action brought by the LHWA is currently in discovery. In addition to general claims of PFOA contamination of drinking water, the action claims “imminent and substantial endangerment to health and or the environment” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). DuPont denies these claims and is defending itself vigorously.
 
While DuPont believes that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to PFOA matters in addition to those matters discussed above for which it has established accruals, a range of such losses, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

Environmental  
The company is also subject to contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the company to take further action to correct the effects on the environment of prior disposal practices or releases of chemical or petroleum substances by the company or other parties. The company accrues for environmental remediation activities consistent with the policy as described in the company's 2011 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Much of this liability results from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, often referred to as Superfund), RCRA and similar state and global laws. These laws require the company to undertake certain

11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

investigative, remediation and restoration activities at sites where the company conducts or once conducted operations or at sites where company-generated waste was disposed. The accrual also includes estimated costs related to a number of sites identified by the company for which it is probable that environmental remediation will be required, but which are not currently the subject of enforcement activities.

Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site. These activities, and their associated costs, depend on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, as well as the presence or absence of potentially responsible parties. At March 31, 2012 , the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included a liability of $424 , relating to these matters and, in management's opinion, is appropriate based on existing facts and circumstances. The average time frame, over which the accrued or presently unrecognized amounts may be paid, based on past history, is estimated to be 15 - 20  years. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to these costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, potential liability may range up to three times the amount accrued as of March 31, 2012 .

Other  
The company has various purchase commitments incident to the ordinary conduct of business. In the aggregate, such commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.

Note 8.  Stockholders’ Equity  
Share Repurchase Program
In the first quarter 2012, the company entered into an agreement with a financial institution and paid $400 for the purchase of shares of common stock. The shares will be received by May 2012. This repurchase will complete the 2001 $2,000 share buyback plan and will begin purchases under the April 2011 $2,000 share buyback plan. There is no expiration date on the current authorizations.

During the first quarter 2011, the company purchased and retired 5.0 million shares at a total cost of $272 under the 2001 plan. Under the 2001 plan, the company has purchased 39.7 million shares at a total cost of $1,884 as of March 31, 2012 .

Other Comprehensive Income
A summary of the changes in other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is provided below:
 
Three Months Ended
Three Months Ended
 
March 31, 2012
March 31, 2011
 
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
Pre-Tax
Tax
After-Tax
Cumulative translation adjustment
$
170

$
—

$
170

$
44

$
—

$
44

Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(2
)
—

(2
)
8

(3
)
5

Clearance of hedge results to earnings
(32
)
13

(19
)
27

(11
)
16

Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(34
)
13

(21
)
35

(14
)
21

Pension benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(23
)
3

(20
)
—

—

—

Prior service cost
22

(7
)
15

—

—

—

Amortization of prior service cost
4

(1
)
3

4

(1
)
3

Amortization of loss
219

(75
)
144

153

(53
)
100

Pension benefit plans, net
222

(80
)
142

157

(54
)
103

Other benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
(30
)
11

(19
)
(30
)
11

(19
)
Amortization of loss
22

(8
)
14

15

(5
)
10

Other benefit plans, net
(8
)
3

(5
)
(15
)
6

(9
)
Net unrealized gain on securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain on securities
1

—

1

1

—

1

Other comprehensive income
$
351

$
(64
)
$
287

$
222

$
(62
)
$
160



12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 9. Financial Instruments
Debt
The estimated fair value of the company's total debt including interest rate financial instruments was determined using level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2011 Annual Report in Note 1, “ Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. ” Based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities, the fair value of the company's debt was approximately $15,940 and $13,880 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , respectively.

Cash Equivalents
The estimated fair value of the company's cash equivalents was determined using level 2 inputs. Based on current interest rates for similar investments with comparable credit risk and time to maturity, the fair value of the company's cash equivalents approximates its stated value of $1,788 and $1,932 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , respectively.

Derivative Instruments
Objectives and Strategies for Holding Derivative Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the company enters into contractual arrangements (derivatives) to reduce its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate and commodity price risks. The company has established a variety of derivative programs to be utilized for financial risk management. These programs reflect varying levels of exposure coverage and time horizons based on an assessment of risk.

Derivative programs have procedures and controls and are approved by the Corporate Financial Risk Management Committee, consistent with the company's financial risk management policies and guidelines. Derivative instruments used are forwards, options, futures and swaps. The company has not designated any nonderivatives as hedging instruments.
 
The company's financial risk management procedures also address counterparty credit approval, limits and routine exposure monitoring and reporting. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions and major commodity exchanges. The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. The company anticipates performance by counterparties to these contracts and therefore no material loss is expected. Market and counterparty credit risks associated with these instruments are regularly reported to management.

The notional amounts of the company's derivative instruments were as follows:
 
March 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
1,000

$
1,000

Foreign currency contracts
2,377

2,032

Commodity contracts
334

553

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:


Foreign currency contracts
7,382

6,444

Commodity contracts
224

437


Foreign Currency Risk
The company's objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency rate changes. Accordingly, the company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of its existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and cash flows.

The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. The primary business objective of this hedging program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes, net of related tax effects, are minimized. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the company's exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. The objective of the hedge program is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.


13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Interest Rate Risk
The company uses interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate mix of the total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing.
Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed for floating rate interest payments to effectively convert fixed rate debt into floating rate debt based on USD LIBOR. Interest rate swaps allow the company to achieve a target range of floating rate debt.

Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risk management programs serve to reduce exposure to price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as copper, corn, soybeans, soybean meal and natural gas. The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge the commodity price risk associated with energy feedstock and agricultural commodity exposures.

Fair Value Hedges
Interest Rate Swaps
At March 31, 2012 , the company maintained a number of interest rate swaps, which were implemented at the time debt instruments were issued, to manage the interest rate mix of the total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. All interest rate swaps qualify for the shortcut method of hedge accounting, thus there is no ineffectiveness related to these hedges.

Cash Flow Hedges
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company uses foreign currency exchange instruments such as forwards and options to offset a portion of the company's exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues.

Commodity Contracts
The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments, including options, futures and swaps, to hedge the commodity price risk associated with energy feedstock and agriculture commodity exposures.

While each risk management program has a different time maturity period, most programs currently do not extend beyond the next two-year period. Cash flow hedge results are reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the related exposure impacts earnings. Reclassifications are made sooner if it appears that a forecasted transaction will not materialize. The following table summarizes the after-tax effect of cash flow hedges on accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 :
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Beginning balance
$
41

$
(31
)
Net revaluation and clearance of cash flow hedges to earnings
(23
)
22

Ending balance
$
18

$
(9
)

At March 31, 2012 , the after-tax amount expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings over the next 12 months is $15 .

Derivatives not Designated in Hedging Relationships
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to reduce its net exposure, by currency, related to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes are minimized. The netting of such exposures precludes the use of hedge accounting; however, the required revaluation of the forward contracts and the associated foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities intends to achieve a minimal earnings impact, after taxes. Additionally, the company has cross-currency swaps to hedge foreign currency fluctuations on long-term intercompany loans.

Commodity Contracts
The company utilizes options, futures and swaps that are not designated as hedging instruments to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans and soybean meal.


14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The table below presents the fair values of the company's derivative assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy, as described in the company's 2011 Annual Report in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
 
 
Fair Value Using Level 2 Inputs
 
Balance Sheet Location
March 31,
2012
December 31, 2011
Asset derivatives:
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Other assets
$
63

$
66

Foreign currency contracts
Accounts and notes receivable, net
31

44

 
 
94

110

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
Accounts and notes receivable, net
95

100

Foreign currency contracts
Other assets
34

43

 
 
129

143

Total asset derivatives
 
$
223

$
253

Liability derivatives:
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
Other accrued liabilities
$
7

$
12

Commodity contracts
Other accrued liabilities
—

1

 
 
7

13

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
Other accrued liabilities
48

21

Commodity contracts
Other accrued liabilities
2

2

 
 
50

23

Total liability derivatives
 
$
57

$
36



15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Effect of Derivative Instruments
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI 1
(Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income 2
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Income Statement Classification
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
—

$
—

$
(3
)
$
(10
)
Interest expense 3
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
(10
)
(21
)
3

(5
)
Net sales
Commodity contracts
6

30

29

(22
)
COGS 4
 
(4
)
9

29

(37
)
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
—

—

(128
)
(373
)
Other income, net 5
Commodity contracts
—

—

(11
)
1

COGS 4
 
—

—

(139
)
(372
)
 
Total derivatives
$
(4
)
$
9

$
(110
)
$
(409
)
 

1   
OCI is defined as other comprehensive income (loss).
2   
For cash flow hedges, this represents the effective portion of the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income during the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there was no material ineffectiveness with regard to the company's cash flow hedges.
3   
Gain (loss) recognized in income of derivative is offset to $0 by gain (loss) recognized in income of the hedged item.
4   
COGS is defined as costs of goods sold and other operating charges.
5   
Gain (loss) recognized in other income, net, was partially offset by the related gain (loss) on the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of the company's operations, which were $48 and $230 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 10. Long-Term Employee Benefits  
The following sets forth the components of the company’s net periodic benefit cost for pensions:  
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Service cost
$
68

$
59

Interest cost
297

310

Expected return on plan assets
(381
)
(365
)
Amortization of unrecognized loss
219

153

Amortization of prior service cost
4

4

Net periodic benefit cost
$
207

$
161

 
The following sets forth the components of the company’s net periodic benefit cost for other long-term employee benefits:  
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2012
2011
Service cost
$
9

$
8

Interest cost
48

53

Amortization of unrecognized loss
22

15

Amortization of prior service benefit
(30
)
(30
)
Net periodic benefit cost
$
49

$
46

 


16
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Note 11.  Segment Information  
Segment sales include transfers to another business segment. Products are transferred between segments on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as practicable, the market value of the products. Segment pre-tax operating income (loss) (PTOI) is defined as operating income (loss) before income taxes, exchange gains (losses), corporate expenses and interest. Prior year data has been reclassified to reflect the current organizational structure.

Three Months Ended
March 31,
Agriculture 1
Electronics &
Communications
Industrial Biosciences
Nutrition & Health
Performance
Chemicals
Performance
Coatings
Performance
Materials
Safety &
Protection
Pharm-aceuticals
Other
Total
2012
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
4,080

 
$
677

 
$
288

 
$
808

 
$
1,900

 
$
1,050

 
$
1,600

 
$
941

 
$
—

 
$
1

 
$
11,345

Less: Transfers
2

 
4

 
3

 
—

 
77

 
—

 
26

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
115

Net sales
4,078

 
673

 
285

 
808

 
1,823

 
1,050

 
1,574

 
938

 
—

 
1

 
11,230

PTOI
1,264

2  
33

 
41

 
83

 
512

 
87

 
240

 
100

 
27

 
(60
)
 
2,327

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Segment sales
$
3,504

 
$
811

 
$
—

 
$
324

 
$
1,797

 
$
993

 
$
1,707

 
$
965

 
$
—

 
$
36

 
$
10,137

Less: Transfers
—

 
5

 
—

 
—

 
67

 
—

 
28

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
103

Net sales
3,504

 
806

 
—

 
324

 
1,730

 
993

 
1,679

 
962

 
—

 
36

 
10,034

PTOI
1,111

 
111

 
—

 
25

 
394

 
65

 
288

 
145

 
50

 
(64
)
 
2,125


1  
As of March 31, 2012 , Agriculture net assets were $7,509 , an increase of $2,744 from $4,765 at December 31, 2011 . The increase was primarily due to higher trade receivables due to normal seasonality in the sales and cash collections cycle.
2  
Included a $(50) charge recorded in cost of goods sold and other operating charges associated with the company's process to fairly resolve claims associated with the use of Imprelis ® . See Note 7 for additional information.

Reconciliation to Consolidated Income Statements 
 
Three Months Ended
 March 31,
 
2012
2011
Total segment PTOI
$
2,327

$
2,125

Net exchange losses, including affiliates
(80
)
(143
)
Corporate expenses and net interest
(306
)
(280
)
Income before income taxes
$
1,941

$
1,702


Note 12.  Subsequent Event
In April 2012, the company completed the sale of its interest in an equity method investment and expects to record an after-tax gain of about $75 .


17

Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Cautionary Statements About Forward-Looking Statements
 This report contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates” or other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the company's strategy for growth, product development, regulatory approval, market position, anticipated benefits of recent acquisitions, outcome of contingencies, such as litigation and environmental matters, expenditures and financial results, are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events which may not be accurate or realized. Forward-looking statements also involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company's control. Some of the important factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in any such forward-looking statements are:

•
Fluctuations in energy and raw material prices;
•
Failure to develop and market new products and optimally manage product life cycles;
•
Outcome of significant litigation and environmental matters, including those related to divested businesses;
•
Failure to appropriately manage process safety and product stewardship issues;
•
Effect of changes in tax, environmental and other laws and regulations or political conditions in the United States of America (U.S.) and other countries in which the company operates;
•
Conditions in the global economy and global capital markets, including economic factors, such as inflation, deflation and fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices, as well as regulatory requirements;
•
Impact of business disruptions, including supply disruptions, and security threats, regardless of cause, including acts of sabotage, terrorism or war, weather events and natural disasters;
•
Inability to protect and enforce the company's intellectual property rights; and
•
Successful integration of acquired businesses and completion of divestitures of underperforming or non-strategic assets or businesses.

For additional information on these and other risks and factors that could affect our forward-looking statements, see the company's Risk Factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A of the company's 2011 Annual Report.

Results of Operations  
Overview
The company continued to execute its strategy for growth by applying its science and technology to address three challenges driven by global population growth: feeding the world, reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and keeping people and the environment safe . The following are highlights from the results of operations for the first quarter 2012:

•
First quarter 2012 earnings were $1.57 per share versus $1.52 per share in 2011.
•
Sales of $11.2 billion were up 12 percent including a 7 percent net sales increase from portfolio changes. Volume, down 2 percent compared to the same period last year, showed sequential improvement in industrial markets, which includes titanium dioxide, indicating a positive shift in momentum heading into the second quarter 2012. Sales in developing markets 1 grew 15 percent, led by growth in Agriculture.
•
Segment pre-tax operating income increased $202 million, or 10 percent versus the prior year, principally due to gains in Agriculture, Performance Chemicals and the benefit of prior-year acquisitions in Nutrition & Health and Industrial Biosciences.
•
Agriculture delivered 16 percent higher sales and a 14 percent increase in pre-tax operating income versus last year’s first quarter. This reflects strong global business performance and an early start to the North American and European selling seasons, which increased first quarter 2012 earnings about $0.03 per share.
•
DuPont continues to achieve fixed cost, working capital and variable cost productivity through disciplined business processes called DuPont Integrated Business Management and DuPont Production Systems. The company remains on track with productivity initiatives achieving improvements of approximately $100 million for both fixed costs and working capital in the first quarter 2012.



____________________________
1
Developing markets include China, India and countries located in Latin America, Eastern and Central Europe, Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia.

18
Table of Contents

Net Sales
Net sales for the first quarter 2012 were $11.2 billion versus $10.0 billion in the prior year, an increase of 12 percent, reflecting a 7 percent net increase from portfolio changes, principally the Danisco acquisition, and an 8 percent increase in local prices, partly offset by 2 percent lower volume and a 1 percent sales reduction from currency impact. The 2 percent decline in total company volume reflects strong Agriculture segment volume gains in all regions offset by lower volume for most segments in Asia Pacific. Lower volume in Asia Pacific resulted from weaker market demand for titanium dioxide, electronic materials and polymers. Sales in developing markets totaling $3.4 billion improved 15 percent from 2011 including the benefit from portfolio changes. The percentage of total company sales in these markets increased to 31 percent from 30 percent in the prior year.

The table below shows a regional breakdown of net sales based on location of customers and percentage variances from the prior year: 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2012
 
Percent Change Due to:
 
Net Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2011
Local
Price
Currency
Effect
Volume
Portfolio
Worldwide
$
11.2

12

8

(1
)
(2
)
7

U.S. & Canada
4.8

13

9

—

—

4

Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA)
3.2

14

8

(3
)
(1
)
10

Asia Pacific
2.0

—

4

1

(13
)
8

Latin America
1.2

23

15

(3
)
4

7


Other Income, Net
Other income, net, totaled $26 million for the first quarter 2012, essentially flat compared to $25 million in the prior year.

Additional information related to the company's other income, net, is included in Note 2 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges (COGS)
COGS totaled $7.5 billion in the first quarter 2012 versus $6.8 billion in the prior year, an increase of 10 percent. COGS as a percent of net sales decreased 1 percentage point to 67 percent, principally reflecting higher selling prices and productivity improvements more than offsetting raw material, energy and freight costs, which were up about 7 percent as compared to the same period last year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)
SG&A totaled $1.2 billion for the first quarter 2012 versus $1.0 billion in the prior year. The increase was due to additional selling expense of acquired companies and increased global commissions and selling and marketing investments primarily in the Agriculture segment. SG&A was approximately 10 percent of net sales for the first quarter 2012 and 2011.

Research and Development Expense (R&D)
R&D totaled $505 million for the first quarter 2012 compared to $399 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the addition of R&D from acquired companies and continued growth investments in the Agriculture segment, primarily related to spending for development of new products. R&D was approximately 4 percent of net sales for the first quarter 2012 and 2011.

Interest Expense
Interest expense totaled $114 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to $100 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher average debt resulting from financing for the Danisco acquisition, partially offset by lower interest rates.

Provision for Income Taxes
The company's effective tax rate for the first quarter 2012 was 22.7 percent as compared to 15.2 percent in 2011. The higher effective tax rate in 2012 versus 2011 principally relates to the tax impact associated with the company's policy of hedging the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations and geographic mix of earnings.

See Note 3 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


19
Table of Contents

Net Income Attributable to DuPont
Net income attributable to DuPont for the first quarter 2012 was $1.5 billion versus $1.4 billion in the first quarter 2011, a 4 percent increase for the reasons noted above.

Segment Reviews
Summarized below are comments on individual segment sales and pre-tax operating income (loss) (PTOI) for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011 . Segment sales include transfers to another business segment. Products are transferred between segments on a basis intended to reflect, as nearly as practicable, the market value of the products. Segment PTOI is defined as operating income (loss) before income taxes, exchange gains (losses), corporate expenses and interest. All references to selling prices are on a U.S. dollar (USD) basis, including the impact of currency. A reconciliation of segment sales to consolidated net sales and segment PTOI to income before income taxes for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is included in Note 11 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes first quarter 2012 segment sales and related variances versus prior year:
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2012
Percentage Change Due to:
 
Segment
Sales
($ Billions)
Percent
Change vs.
2011
Selling
Price
Volume
Portfolio
and Other
Agriculture
$
4.1

16

8
8

—

Electronics & Communications
0.7

(17
)
1
(18
)
—

Industrial Biosciences
0.3

nm

nm
nm

nm

Nutrition & Health
0.8

149

—
(5
)
154

Performance Chemicals
1.9

6

16
(10
)
—

Performance Coatings
1.1

6

6
—

—

Performance Materials
1.6

(6
)
6
(10
)
(2
)
Safety & Protection
0.9

(2
)
3
(5
)
—

nm - not meaningful

Agriculture - Sales of $4.1 billion were up $576 million, or 16 percent , with 8 percent price and 8 percent volume gains. Seed sales of $3.2 billion grew 20 percent reflecting strong global performance with robust North American corn sales, a strong, early start to the European season and commercial success in Brazil's Safrinha season. Crop Protection product sales of $0.9 billion increased 7 percent underpinned by particular strength in insect control product volumes and price gains across the portfolio. PTOI of $1.3 billion improved 14 percent on higher volume and price partially offset by input cost increases, unfavorable currency impact, higher spending for growth investments and a $50 million charge related to Imprelis ® herbicide claims. See Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to this matter.

Electronics & Communications - Sales of $677 million were down 17 percent on 18 percent lower volume. Sales reflect continued soft demand in photovoltaics, partially offset by increased demand for smart phones and tablets. Although photovoltaic sales were lower compared to the same period last year, there was sequential growth from the fourth quarter 2011. PTOI of $33 million declined $78 million from lower volume and plant utilization.

Industrial Biosciences - Sales of $288 million and PTOI of $41 million primarily reflect the acquisition of Danisco's enzyme business. PTOI includes $5 million of amortization expense associated with the fair value step-up of acquired intangible assets.

Nutrition & Health - Sales of $808 million increased $484 million and PTOI of $83 million was up $58 million reflecting the benefits from the integration and cost synergies related to the Danisco specialty food ingredients acquisition. PTOI includes $21 million of amortization expense associated with the fair value step-up of acquired intangible assets.

Performance Chemicals - Sales of $1.9 billion were up 6 percent , with 16 percent higher selling prices and 10 percent lower volume. Higher selling prices more than offset higher raw material costs. Lower volume reflects continued softness in titanium dioxide, particularly in Asia Pacific. Global demand for titanium dioxide increased sequentially from the fourth quarter 2011. PTOI of $512 million increased $118 million on higher selling prices and continued productivity actions.


20
Table of Contents

Performance Coatings - Sales of $1.1 billion were up 6 percent on higher selling prices. Higher selling prices across all regions and market segments offset higher raw material costs. Automotive builds were up globally. Continued strong demand in OEM motor vehicle and industrial coatings, particularly in the North American heavy duty truck market, was offset by softening in refinish primarily in southern Europe. PTOI of $87 million increased $22 million on higher selling prices, mix enrichment and continued productivity actions.

Performance Materials - Sales of $1.6 billion were down 6 percent , with 10 percent lower volume and a 2 percent reduction from a portfolio change partially offset by 6 percent higher selling prices. Demand improved in the automotive market, particularly in North America, but was more than offset by continued softness in the industrial and electronic markets. Although volume was down compared to the same period last year, there was sequential growth from the fourth quarter 2011. Higher selling prices offset higher raw material costs. PTOI of $240 million decreased $48 million due to lower volume.

Safety & Protection - Sales of $941 million were down 2 percent , with 5 percent lower volume partially offset by 3 percent higher selling prices. Volume was lower on continued softness in industrial markets. Higher selling prices reflect value-based pricing. PTOI of $100 million decreased $45 million on lower volume and higher spending for growth initiatives primarily related to costs associated with operating the new Kevlar ® aramids Cooper River plant.

Pharmaceuticals - PTOI was $27 million compared to $50 million in the same period last year. Decreased PTOI reflects the expiration of certain patents for Cozaar ® /Hyzaar ® .

Liquidity & Capital Resources
(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
$
3,601

$
4,019

Total debt
14,825

12,553


The company believes its ability to generate cash from operations and access to capital markets will be adequate to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund working capital, capital spending, dividend payments, debt maturities and other cash needs. The company's liquidity needs can be met through a variety of sources, including: cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, commercial paper, syndicated credit lines, bilateral credit lines, equity and long-term debt markets and asset sales. The company's current strong financial position, liquidity and credit ratings provide excellent access to the capital markets. In addition, spending and capital productivity actions have been implemented. The company will continue to monitor the financial markets in order to respond to changing conditions. Depending on these conditions, the proceeds of commercial paper may be invested in cash equivalents or marketable securities.

Pursuant to its cash discipline policy, the company seeks first to maintain a strong balance sheet and second, to return excess cash to shareholders unless the opportunity to invest for growth is compelling. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities provide primary liquidity to support all short-term obligations. A substantial majority of the company's cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is held by foreign subsidiaries and is considered to be indefinitely reinvested and expected to be utilized to fund local operating activities and capital expenditure requirements. The company believes that it has sufficient sources of domestic liquidity to further support its assumption that undistributed earnings at March 31, 2012 can be considered reinvested indefinitely. The company has access to approximately $4.3 billion in unused cr edit lines with several major financial institutions, as additional support to meet short-term liquidity needs and general corporate purposes, including letters of credit.

The company continually reviews its debt portfolio and occasionally may rebalance it to ensure adequate liquidity and an optimum debt maturity schedule.

The company's credit ratings impact its access to the debt capital market and cost of capital. The company remains committed to a strong financial position and strong investment-grade rating. The company's long-term and short-term credit ratings are as follows:
 
Long-term
Short-term
Outlook
Standard & Poor's
A
A-1
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service
A2
P-1
Stable
Fitch Ratings
A
F1
Stable


21
Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flows 
Cash used for operating activities was $1.9 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to cash used for operating activities of $1.5 billion during the same period last year. The $0.4 billion change was primarily due to a $0.5 billion contribution to the U.S. pension plan.

Cash used for investing activities was $0.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to cash used for investing activities of $1.0 billion for the same period last year. The $0.8 billion change was primarily due to a decrease in restricted cash from the issuance of debt in connection with the Danisco acquisition, partially offset by lower proceeds from the sale of short-term financial instruments. Purchases of property, plant and equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $301 million, a decrease of $22 million compared to the same period last year.

Cash provided by financing activities was $1.8 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2012 , essentially unchanged from the $1.9 billion provided during the same period last year.
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
(Dollars in millions) 
2012
2011
Cash used for operating activities
$
(1,877
)
$
(1,484
)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(301
)
(323
)
Free cash flow
$
(2,178
)
$
(1,807
)
 
Free cash flow is a measurement not recognized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP) and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. All companies do not calculate non-GAAP financial measures in the same manner and, accordingly, the company's free cash flow definition may not be consistent with the methodologies used by other companies. The company defines free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment, and therefore indicates operating cash flow available for payment of dividends, other investing activities and other financing activities. Free cash flow is useful to investors and management to evaluate the company's cash flow and financial performance, and is an integral financial measure used in the company's financial planning process.

Dividends paid to shareholders during the three months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $386 million. In January 2012, the company’s Board of Directors declared a first quarter common stock dividend of $0.41 per share. The first quarter dividend was the company’s 430 th consecutive quarterly dividend since the company’s first dividend in the fourth quarter 1904.

In the first quarter 2012, the company entered into an agreement with a financial institution and paid $400 million for the purchase of shares of common stock. The shares will be received by May 2012. See Note 8 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
For detailed information related to Guarantees, Indemnifications, and Obligations for Equity Affiliates and Others, see page 31 of the company's 2011 Annual Report, and Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contractual Obligations  
Information related to the company's contractual obligations at December 31, 2011 can be found on page 31 of the company's 2011 Annual Report. There have been no significant changes to the company's contractual obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

PFOA
See discussion under “PFOA” on page 35 of the company's 2011 Annual Report and Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements. 

Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  

See Note 9, “Financial Instruments”, to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements. See also Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, on pages 35 - 36 of the company's 2011 Annual Report for information on the company's utilization of financial instruments and an analysis of the sensitivity of these instruments.


22
Table of Contents

Item 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  

a)        Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
The company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures to give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the company's reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These controls and procedures also give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of March 31, 2012 , the company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), together with management, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
b)                           Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There has been no change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the company's internal control over financial reporting.

23
Table of Contents

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  

The company is subject to various litigation matters, including, but not limited to, product liability, patent infringement, antitrust claims, and claims for third party property damage or personal injury stemming from alleged environmental torts. Information regarding certain of these matters is set forth below and in Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Litigation
Imprelis ® Herbicide Claims Process
Information related to this matter is included in Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading Imprelis ® .

PFOA: Environmental and Litigation Proceedings
For purposes of this report, the term PFOA means collectively perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts, including the ammonium salt and does not distinguish between the two forms. Information related to this matter is included in Note 7 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading PFOA.

Environmental Proceedings
Belle Plant, West Virginia
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is investigating three chemical releases at DuPont's Belle facility in West Virginia which occurred in January 2010. One of the releases involved the death of a DuPont employee after exposure to phosgene.

Chambers Works Plant, Deepwater, New Jersey
In 2010, the government initiated an enforcement action alleging that the facility violated recordkeeping requirements of certain provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Federal Clean Air Act Regulations (FCAR) governing Leak Detection and Reporting and that it failed to report emissions of a compound from Chambers Works' waste water treatment facility under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. The alleged non-compliance was identified by EPA in 2007 and 2009 following separate environmental audits. DuPont is in settlement negotiations with EPA and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Yerkes Plant, Buffalo, New York
The government alleges that the facility violated recordkeeping requirements of certain provisions of the CAA and the FCAR governing Leak Detection and Reporting and that it failed to accurately report emissions under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. The alleged non-compliance was identified by EPA in 2006 and 2010 following separate environmental audits. DuPont is in settlement negotiations with EPA and DOJ.

LaPorte Plant, LaPorte, Texas
EPA conducted a multimedia inspection at the LaPorte facility in January of 2008. DuPont, EPA and DOJ began discussions in the fall of 2011 relating primarily to the management of certain materials in the facility's wastewater treatment system. These negotiations continue.


24
Table of Contents


Item 1A. RISK FACTORS  

There have been no material changes in the company's risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the company's 2011 Annual Report.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

In the first quarter 2012, the company entered into an agreement with a financial institution and paid $400 million for the purchase of shares of common stock. The shares will be received by May 2012. See Note 8 to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Information regarding mine safety and other regulatory actions at the company's surface mine in Starke, Florida is included in Exhibit 95 to this report.

Item 6.
EXHIBITS

Exhibits: The list of exhibits in the Exhibit Index to this report is incorporated herein by reference.


25
Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
Date:
April 24, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
 
 
 
 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
 
Executive Vice President and
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(As Duly Authorized Officer and
 
 
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


26
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007).
 
 
 
3.2
 
Company’s Bylaws, as last amended effective November 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
 
 
 
4
 
The company agrees to provide the Commission, on request, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the company and its subsidiaries.
 
 
 
10.1*
 
The DuPont Stock Accumulation and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as last amended effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
 
 
 
10.2*
 
Company’s Supplemental Retirement Income Plan, as last amended effective June 4, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
 
 
 
10.3*
 
Company’s Pension Restoration Plan, as restated effective July 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011).
 
 
 
10.4*
 
Company’s Rules for Lump Sum Payments, as last amended effective December 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011).
 
 
 
10.5*
 
Company’s Stock Performance Plan, as last amended effective January 25, 2007(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
 
 
 
10.6*
 
Company’s Equity and Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective March 2, 2011 and approved by the company’s shareholders on April 27, 2011 (incorporated by reference to pages B1-B15 of the company’s Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated March 18, 2011).
 
 
 
10.7*
 
Form of Award Terms under the company’s Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009).
 
 
 
10.8*
 
Company’s Retirement Savings Restoration Plan, as last amended effective June 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011).
 
 
 
10.9*
 
Company’s Retirement Income Plan for Directors, as last amended January 2011.


27
Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
10.10*
 
Company’s Management Deferred Compensation Plan, adopted on May 2, 2008, as last amended May 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010).
 
 
 
10.11*
 
Supplemental Deferral Terms for Deferred Long Term Incentive Awards and Deferred Variable Compensation Awards (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
 
 
 
12
 
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
 
 
 
31.1
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Principal Executive Officer.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the company’s Principal Financial Officer.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Principal Executive Officer. The information contained in this Exhibit shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission nor incorporated by reference in any registration statement filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 
 
32.2
 
Section 1350 Certification of the company’s Principal Financial Officer. The information contained in this Exhibit shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission nor incorporated by reference in any registration statement filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 
 
95
 
Mine Safety Disclosures.
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
______________________________________
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-Q.


28

Exhibit 10.9

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
AS LAST AMENDED JANUARY 2011


I. PURPOSE

The purpose of the Retirement Income Plan for Directors ("the Plan") is to maintain a compensation package that will continue to attract and retain persons of outstanding competence for membership on the Board of Directors of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (the "Company").

II. ELIGIBILITY

A Director will be eligible for benefits under this Plan if, on the date of retirement from the Board, such director has served the Company as a director for at least five years; provided, however, a director who has qualified for an immediate or deferred pension benefit from the Company or any of its subsidiaries is ineligible to participate in the Plan.

III. AMOUNT OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The annual benefits payable under the Plan shall be equal to one-half of the annual Board retainer (up to $85,000 and excluding any amounts payable for committee service and the value of any stock granted under the DuPont Stock Accumulation and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors) in effect on the Director's date of retirement. One-twelfth of such benefits will be paid monthly.

IV. DURATION OF BENEFITS

The monthly benefits provided by this Plan begin in the month following retirement from the Board and shall continue (a) until 120 such monthly payments have been made, or (b) until and including the month in which the retired Director dies, whichever comes first. No death benefits are payable under the Plan.

V. NONASSIGNABILITY

During the Director's lifetime, the right to any retirement benefit shall not be transferable or assignable.

VI. INTERPRETATION AND AMENDMENT

The Plan shall be administered by the Office of the Chairman of the Company. The decision of the Office of the Chairman with respect to any questions arising as to the interpretation of this Plan, including the severability of any and all of the provisions thereof, shall be final, conclusive, and binding. The Office of the Chairman reserves the right to modify this Plan from time to time, or to repeal the Plan entirely.




Exhibit 12
 
E.  I.  DU  PONT  DE  NEMOURS  AND  COMPANY
 
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
 
2007
Income before income taxes
 
$
1,941

 
$
4,282

 
$
3,711

 
$
2,184

 
$
2,391

 
$
3,743

Adjustment for companies accounted for by the
   equity method
 
2

 
(72
)
 
(74
)
 
(50
)
 
6

 
218

Capitalized interest
 
(11
)
 
(46
)
 
(38
)
 
(47
)
 
(49
)
 
(45
)
Amortization of capitalized interest
 
9

 
36

 
35

 
37

 
37

 
34

 
 
1,941

 
4,200

 
3,634

 
2,124

 
2,385

 
3,950

Fixed charges:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest and debt expense
 
114

 
447

 
590

 
408

 
376

 
430

Capitalized interest
 
11

 
46

 
38

 
47

 
49

 
45

Rental expense representative of interest factor
 
26

 
103

 
89

 
101

 
107

 
107

 
 
151

 
596

 
717

 
556

 
532

 
582

Total adjusted earnings available for payment of
    fixed charges
 
$
2,092

 
$
4,796

 
$
4,351

 
$
2,680

 
$
2,917

 
$
4,532

Number of times fixed charges earned
 
13.9

 
8.0

 
6.1

 
4.8

 
5.5

 
7.8





Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATIONS
 
I, Ellen J. Kullman, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
April 24, 2012
 
 
By:
/s/Ellen J. Kullman
 
 
 
Ellen J. Kullman
 
Chief Executive Officer and
 
Chair of the Board




Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATIONS
 
I, Nicholas C. Fanandakis, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
April 24, 2012
 
 
By:
/s/Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
 
 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
Executive Vice President and
 
Chief Financial Officer




Exhibit 32.1
 
Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
In connection with the Quarterly Report of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ellen J. Kullman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/Ellen J. Kullman
 
Ellen J. Kullman
Chief Executive Officer
April 24, 2012





Exhibit 32.2
 
Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
In connection with the Quarterly Report of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nicholas C. Fanandakis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/Nicholas C. Fanandakis
 
Nicholas C. Fanandakis
Chief Financial Officer
April 24, 2012

 



Exhibit 95

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

The company owns and operates a surface mine near Starke, Florida. The following table provides information about citations, orders and notices issued from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

Mine
(MSHA
Identification
Number)
Section
104
S&S 1  
Citations
(#)
Section104(b)
Orders
(#)
Section
104(d)
Citations
and
Orders
(#)
Section
110(b)(2)
Violations
(#)
Section
107(a)
Orders
(#)
Total
Dollar
Value of
MSHA
Assessments
Proposed
($)
Total
Number
of
Mining
Related
Fatalities
(#)
Received
Notice of
Pattern of
Violations
Under
Section
104(e)
(yes/no)
Received
Notice of
Potential
to Have
Pattern
Under
Section
104(e)
(yes/no)
Legal
Actions
Pending
as of
Last Day
of Period
(#)
Legal
Actions
Initiated
During
Period
(#)
Legal
Actions
Resolved
During
Period
(#)
Starke, FL
(0800225)
8

—

—

—

1
2  
$
12,318

—

No
No
1

3  
—

—


1  
S&S refers to significant and substantial violations of mandatory health or safety standards under section 104 of the Mine Act.
2  
On February 8, 2012, the company received an imminent danger order under Section 107(a) of the Mine Act.
3  
A single legal action is pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission involving the company’s contest of proposed penalties related to citations issued during the year ended December 31, 2011.