Securities Act of 1933 Registration No. 002-41839
Investment Company Act of 1940 Registration No. 811-02105
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 [X]
[ ] Pre-Effective Amendment No. ______
[X] Post-Effective Amendment No. 563
and
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 [X]
[X] Amendment No. 563
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrants Telephone Number: 617-563-7000
Margaret Carey, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
It is proposed that this filing will become effective on June 29, 2023 pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time.
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]()
245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund |
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.025
%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.025
%
|
1 year
|
$
|
3
|
3 years
|
$
|
8
|
5 years
|
$
|
14
|
10 years
|
$
|
32
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
34.78
%
|
13.11
%
|
-
2.44
%
|
13.86
%
|
18.47
%
|
-
9.05
%
|
30.51
%
|
17.11
%
|
22.56
%
|
-
17.28
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
24.55
%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
27.04
%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
4.05
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
17.28
%
|
7.10
%
|
10.95
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
17.70
%
|
6.37
%
|
10.16
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
9.96
%
|
5.48
%
|
8.86
%
|
Russell Midcap® Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
17.32
%
|
7.10
%
|
10.96
%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.025
%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.025
%
|
1 year
|
$
|
3
|
3 years
|
$
|
8
|
5 years
|
$
|
14
|
10 years
|
$
|
32
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
39.02
%
|
5.19
%
|
-
4.24
%
|
21.63
%
|
14.85
%
|
-
10.88
%
|
25.71
%
|
19.99
%
|
14.72
%
|
-
20.27
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
31.28
%
|
December 31, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
30.62
%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
2.81
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
20.27
%
|
4.22
%
|
9.17
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
20.54
%
|
3.45
%
|
8.26
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
11.87
%
|
3.18
%
|
7.26
%
|
Russell 2000® Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
20.44
%
|
4.13
%
|
9.01
%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
0.025%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
0.025%
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
27.85
|
$
|
30.70
|
$
|
19.71
|
$
|
22.53
|
$
|
20.85
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.46
|
.38
|
.34
|
.40
|
.36
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(.94)
|
(2.16)
|
11.28
|
(2.54)
|
1.80
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(.48)
|
(1.78)
|
11.62
|
(2.14)
|
2.16
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.41)
|
(.35)
|
(.37)
|
(.34)
|
(.34)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(.12)
|
(.72)
|
(.26)
|
(.34)
|
(.14)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.54)
C
|
(1.07)
|
(.63)
|
(.68)
|
(.48)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
26.83
|
$
|
27.85
|
$
|
30.70
|
$
|
19.71
|
$
|
22.53
|
Total Return
D
|
(1.65)%
|
(6.13)%
|
59.59%
|
(9.99)%
|
10.68%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.02%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.72%
|
1.24%
|
1.35%
|
1.82%
|
1.71%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
26,520,703
|
$
|
24,606,512
|
$
|
21,954,129
|
$
|
11,955,404
|
$
|
9,705,989
|
Portfolio turnover rate
G
|
9%
H
|
12%
H
|
14%
H
|
14%
|
12%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
22.98
|
$
|
28.75
|
$
|
16.60
|
$
|
20.43
|
$
|
20.49
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.38
|
.30
|
.25
|
.27
|
.27
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(1.18)
|
(4.99)
|
12.13
|
(3.48)
|
.60
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(.80)
|
(4.69)
|
12.38
|
(3.21)
|
.87
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.27)
|
(.35)
|
(.23)
|
(.28)
|
(.23)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.73)
|
-
|
(.35)
|
(.70)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.27)
|
(1.08)
|
(.23)
|
(.62)
C
|
(.93)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
21.91
|
$
|
22.98
|
$
|
28.75
|
$
|
16.60
|
$
|
20.43
|
Total Return
D
|
(3.46)%
|
(16.89)%
|
74.95%
|
(16.27)%
|
4.74%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.03%
|
.02%
G
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.03%
|
.02%
G
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.02%
|
.02%
G
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
.03%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.69%
|
1.10%
|
1.09%
|
1.42%
|
1.37%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
19,732,038
|
$
|
18,704,544
|
$
|
21,215,363
|
$
|
9,927,295
|
$
|
8,564,571
|
Portfolio turnover rate
H
|
9%
I
|
24%
I
|
19%
|
17%
|
18%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account. For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.929317.113
|
MCX-I-SCX-I-PRO-0623
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]()
245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.035
%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.035
%
|
1 year
|
$
|
4
|
3 years
|
$
|
11
|
5 years
|
$
|
20
|
10 years
|
$
|
45
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
13.79
%
|
-
8.26
%
|
26.51
%
|
2.86
%
|
25.11
%
|
-
7.57
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
16.29
%
|
December 31, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
26.72
%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
1.01
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund
A
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
7.57
%
|
6.66
%
|
8.69
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
8.02
%
|
5.99
%
|
8.03
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
4.18
%
|
5.10
%
|
6.81
%
|
Russell 1000® Value Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
7.54
%
|
6.67
%
|
8.69
%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
0.035%
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
15.30
|
$
|
15.35
|
$
|
10.77
|
$
|
12.58
|
$
|
11.86
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.34
|
.30
|
.28
|
.33
|
.30
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(.17)
|
(.10)
|
4.60
|
(1.64)
|
.73
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.17
|
.20
|
4.88
|
(1.31)
|
1.03
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.30)
|
(.25)
|
(.30)
|
(.28)
|
(.25)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(.22)
|
(.06)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.30)
|
(.25)
|
(.30)
|
(.50)
|
(.31)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
15.17
|
$
|
15.30
|
$
|
15.35
|
$
|
10.77
|
$
|
12.58
|
Total Return
C
|
1.18%
|
1.27%
|
45.93%
|
(11.04)%
|
9.15%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.03%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.28%
|
1.90%
|
2.24%
|
2.65%
|
2.55%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
5,986,235
|
$
|
5,307,593
|
$
|
3,689,832
|
$
|
2,298,504
|
$
|
2,097,991
|
Portfolio turnover rate
F
|
16%
|
16%
|
31%
|
27%
|
15%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account. For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9869606.108
|
LC2-I-PRO-0623
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]()
245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
None
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.01
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.01
%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.01
%
A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.00
%
|
1 year
|
$
|
0
|
3 years
|
$
|
0
|
5 years
|
$
|
2
|
10 years
|
$
|
9
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||||
36.37
%
|
38.34
%
|
27.64
%
|
-
29.14
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
27.66
%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
20.93
%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
14.41
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
A
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
15.47
|
$
|
16.85
|
$
|
11.52
|
$
|
10.54
|
$
|
10.00
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
B,C
|
.15
|
.13
|
.12
|
.14
|
.06
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.20
|
(.92)
|
5.67
|
.99
|
.53
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.35
|
(.79)
|
5.79
|
1.13
|
.59
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.13)
|
(.12)
|
(.13)
|
(.10)
|
(.05)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(.06)
|
(.46)
|
(.33)
|
(.05)
|
-
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.19)
|
(.59)
D
|
(.46)
|
(.15)
|
(.05)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
15.63
|
$
|
15.47
|
$
|
16.85
|
$
|
11.52
|
$
|
10.54
|
Total Return
E,F
|
2.39%
|
(5.34)%
|
51.21%
|
10.77%
|
5.97%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
C,G,H
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.05%
I
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
-%
J
|
-%
J
|
-%
J
|
.01%
|
.01%
I
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
-%
J
|
-%
J
|
-%
J
|
.01%
|
.01%
I
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.04%
|
.73%
|
.85%
|
1.24%
|
.85%
I
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
813,569
|
$
|
643,492
|
$
|
546,009
|
$
|
297,828
|
$
|
263,824
|
Portfolio turnover rate
K
|
29%
|
40%
|
40%
|
45%
|
21%
I
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
|
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For investors other than individuals:
When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.
|
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9891253.105
|
CGI-PRO-0623
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]()
245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund |
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
None
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.00
%
A
|
1 year
|
$
|
0
|
3 years
|
$
|
0
|
5 years
|
$
|
0
|
10 years
|
$
|
0
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-
9.01
%
|
30.56
%
|
17.29
%
|
22.58
%
|
-
17.29
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
24.64
%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
26.96
%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
4.12
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund
A
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
17.29
%
|
7.16
%
|
8.54
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
17.67
%
|
6.50
%
|
7.95
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
10.01
%
|
5.51
%
|
6.68
%
|
Russell Midcap® Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
17.32
%
|
7.10
%
|
8.49
%
|
Plan Accounts:
|
All Other Accounts:
|
www.401k.com
|
www.fidelity.com
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Overnight Express:
Fidelity Investments
100 Crosby Parkway
Covington, KY 41015
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
None
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.00
%
A
|
1 year
|
$
|
0
|
3 years
|
$
|
0
|
5 years
|
$
|
0
|
10 years
|
$
|
0
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-
11.03
%
|
25.69
%
|
20.05
%
|
14.86
%
|
-
20.29
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
31.26
%
|
December 31, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
30.54
%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
2.78
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund
A
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
20.29
%
|
4.21
%
|
6.02
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
20.56
%
|
3.61
%
|
5.44
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
11.88
%
|
3.17
%
|
4.62
%
|
Russell 2000® Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
20.44
%
|
4.13
%
|
5.92
%
|
Plan Accounts:
|
All Other Accounts:
|
www.401k.com
|
www.fidelity.com
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Overnight Express:
Fidelity Investments
100 Crosby Parkway
Covington, KY 41015
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
15.35
|
$
|
16.82
|
$
|
10.78
|
$
|
12.23
|
$
|
11.28
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.26
|
.21
|
.19
|
.22
|
.20
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(.52)
|
(1.18)
|
6.17
|
(1.39)
|
.98
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(.26)
|
(.97)
|
6.36
|
(1.17)
|
1.18
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.23)
|
(.19)
|
(.20)
|
(.18)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(.03)
|
(.31)
|
(.12)
|
(.10)
|
(.05)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.26)
|
(.50)
|
(.32)
|
(.28)
|
(.23)
C
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
14.83
|
$
|
15.35
|
$
|
16.82
|
$
|
10.78
|
$
|
12.23
|
Total Return
D
|
(1.62)%
|
(6.09)%
|
59.64%
|
(9.88)%
|
10.75%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.75%
|
1.27%
|
1.35%
|
1.84%
|
1.76%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
293,963
|
$
|
251,337
|
$
|
189,335
|
$
|
88,365
|
$
|
76,766
|
Portfolio turnover rate
H
|
13%
|
13%
|
26%
|
38%
|
25%
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
13.32
|
$
|
16.47
|
$
|
9.52
|
$
|
11.70
|
$
|
11.43
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.22
|
.18
|
.14
|
.15
|
.16
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(.68)
|
(2.89)
|
6.96
|
(1.98)
|
.35
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(.46)
|
(2.71)
|
7.10
|
(1.83)
|
.51
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.16)
|
(.18)
|
(.15)
|
(.16)
|
(.11)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.26)
|
-
|
(.19)
|
(.12)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.16)
|
(.44)
|
(.15)
|
(.35)
|
(.24)
C
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
12.70
|
$
|
13.32
|
$
|
16.47
|
$
|
9.52
|
$
|
11.70
|
Total Return
D
|
(3.46)%
|
(16.88)%
|
75.01%
|
(16.23)%
|
4.63%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
G
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.66%
|
1.14%
|
1.09%
|
1.36%
|
1.36%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
282,765
|
$
|
242,826
|
$
|
178,073
|
$
|
104,119
|
$
|
74,937
|
Portfolio turnover rate
H
|
16%
|
18%
|
47%
|
18%
|
23%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account. For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9880773.108
|
ZMP-ZAP-PRO-0623
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]()
245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.035
%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000
%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.035
%
|
1 year
|
$
|
4
|
3 years
|
$
|
11
|
5 years
|
$
|
20
|
10 years
|
$
|
45
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
30.12
%
|
-
1.64
%
|
36.37
%
|
38.43
%
|
27.58
%
|
-
29.17
%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
27.76
%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-
20.93
%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
14.41
%
|
March 31, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund
A
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-
29.17
%
|
10.91
%
|
13.38
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-
29.31
%
|
10.48
%
|
12.98
%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-
17.17
%
|
8.66
%
|
10.87
%
|
Russell 1000® Growth Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-
29.14
%
|
10.96
%
|
13.44
%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
June, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
0.035%
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
Years ended April 30,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
23.70
|
$
|
25.63
|
$
|
17.27
|
$
|
15.75
|
$
|
13.62
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss)
A,B
|
.23
|
.19
|
.18
|
.20
|
.19
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.30
|
(1.46)
|
8.60
|
1.50
|
2.13
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.53
|
(1.27)
|
8.78
|
1.70
|
2.32
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.18)
|
(.16)
|
(.18)
|
(.17)
|
(.15)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.50)
|
(.24)
|
(.01)
|
(.04)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.18)
|
(.66)
|
(.42)
|
(.18)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
24.05
|
$
|
23.70
|
$
|
25.63
|
$
|
17.27
|
$
|
15.75
|
Total Return
C
|
2.33%
|
(5.39)%
|
51.34%
|
10.84%
|
17.34%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets
B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.03%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.01%
|
.70%
|
.82%
|
1.20%
|
1.30%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
12,953,183
|
$
|
8,720,854
|
$
|
7,121,373
|
$
|
4,042,492
|
$
|
2,240,759
|
Portfolio turnover rate
F
|
12%
|
14%
|
21%
|
15%
|
14%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account. For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9869600.108
|
LC1-I-PRO-0623
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
FLAPX
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
FLXSX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
13%
|
13%
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
16%
|
18%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,105
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
2,799
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,957
|
0.00%
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
9,464
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
12,394
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
9,089
|
0.01%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
3,255,962
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
$1-$10,000
|
none
|
none
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$1-$10,000
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
80
|
$
|
72
|
$
|
70
|
$
|
87
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
79
|
$
|
70
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
85
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
71
|
$
|
13
|
||||
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
70
|
$
|
13
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
-
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
2023
(A)
|
$
|
100,000
|
2022
(B)
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
2021
(C)
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
2023
(D)
|
$
|
100,000
|
2022
(E)
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
2021
(F)
|
$
|
100,000
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0275% to 0.0260%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0300% to 0.0275%.
|
(C) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0310% to 0.0300%.
|
(D) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0350% to 0.0340%.
|
(E) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0375% to 0.0350%.
|
(F) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0390% to 0.0375%.
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
•
Attendance.
The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
•
Independent Directors.
Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
•
Director Responsiveness.
The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
•
Golden Parachutes.
Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
•
Gender Diversity.
If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
•
Overboarding.
The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
•
Unequal Voting Rights.
If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In
Other Circumstances
when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election.
Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
•
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
•
Frequency Vote.
Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
•
Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute.
Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST
Anti-Takeover Proposals
,
including:
•
Addition of Special Interest Directors
to the board.
•
Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock.
Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
•
Classification of Boards,
Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
•
Fair Price Amendments,
other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
•
Golden Parachutes,
that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
•
Poison Pills.
Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
•
Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights
(
e.g.
, action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
•
Reincorporation
in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
•
Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects
of merger and acquisition proposals.
•
Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board
that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
•
Supermajority Voting Requirements
(i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
•
Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR
proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to
Opt
Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST
the introduction of new classes of
Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST
introduction and FOR elimination of
Cumulative Voting Rights,
except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR
elimination of
Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR
Anti-Greenmail
proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR
charter and by-law amendments expanding the
Indemnification of Directors
to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote
AGAINST
charter and by-law amendments completely
Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR
proposals to adopt
Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation
practices.
XII. Vote FOR
Open-Market
Stock Repurchase Programs
, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR
management proposals to implement a
Reverse Stock Split
when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR
management proposals to
Reduce the Par Value
of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR
the
Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock
if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST
Excessive Increases in Common Stock.
Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST
the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a
Stock Option Plan
if:
• The
stock option plan
includes
evergreen provisions,
which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The
offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value
on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
•
The plan is administered by
(1) a
compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors
or (2) a
board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors,
provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The
plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval,
unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
•
Liberal Definition of Change in Control:
the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST
the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has
repriced outstanding options
.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to
Reprice Outstanding Stock Options
,
taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST
adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for
Restricted Stock Awards
("RSA")
if:
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST
Omnibus Stock Plans
if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST
Stock Awards
(other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs
or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs,
and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder
proposals on other
Compensation Plans or Practices
if such plans or practices are
Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders.
In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals
. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII.
Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access
which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||
Fidelity Flex® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
Fidelity Flex® Small Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
213,705
|
$
|
700,351
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
12,401
|
$
|
38,997
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
91,291
|
$
|
311,606
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
103,692
|
$
|
350,602
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
110,013
|
$
|
349,749
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
FSMDX
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
FSSNX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
9%
|
12%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
9%
|
24%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
245,264
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
194,985
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
130,578
|
0.00%
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
885,596
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
1,134,468
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
492,555
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
196,490,552
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
none
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
(C)
|
$
|
7,602
|
$
|
6,802
|
$
|
6,655
|
$
|
8,223
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
5,835
|
$
|
5,221
|
$
|
5,107
|
$
|
6,312
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(D)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
(C)
|
$
|
6,719
|
$
|
1,195
|
||||
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
5,157
|
$
|
920
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(D)
|
$
|
497,500
|
-
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals' aggregate compensation from the fund includes accrued voluntary deferred compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $2,817; Laura M. Bishop, $3,663; Ann E. Dunwoody, $6,162; John Engler, $6,162; Robert F. Gartland, $3,844; Robert W. Helm, $6,162; Mark A. Murray, $6,162; and Carol J. Zierhoffer, $179.
|
(D) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
|
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
|
CO
|
7.89%
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC
|
SAN FRANCISCO
|
CA
|
6.68%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
|
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
|
CO
|
7.38%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC
|
SAN FRANCISCO
|
CA
|
6.21%
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
PRINCIPAL SECURITIES INC
|
DES MOINES
|
IA
|
5.40%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
6,067
|
$
|
6,116,403
|
2022
|
$
|
307
|
$
|
6,000,372
|
|
2021
|
$
|
256
|
$
|
4,073,026
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
15,036
|
$
|
4,683,823
|
2022
|
$
|
122
|
$
|
5,255,940
|
|
2021
|
$
|
449
|
$
|
3,652,708
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
2023
(A)
|
$
|
6,604,494
|
2022
(B)
|
$
|
6,816,771
|
|
2021
(C)
|
$
|
4,999,074
|
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
2023
(D)
|
$
|
6,540,562
|
2022
(E)
|
$
|
7,580,856
|
|
2021
(F)
|
$
|
5,609,212
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0275% to 0.0260%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0300% to 0.0275%.
|
(C) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0310% to 0.0300%.
|
(D) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0350% to 0.0340%.
|
(E) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0375% to 0.0350%.
|
(F) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0390% to 0.0375%.
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
•
Attendance.
The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
•
Independent Directors.
Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
•
Director Responsiveness.
The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
•
Golden Parachutes.
Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
•
Gender Diversity.
If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
•
Overboarding.
The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
•
Unequal Voting Rights.
If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In
Other Circumstances
when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election.
Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
•
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
•
Frequency Vote.
Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
•
Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute.
Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST
Anti-Takeover Proposals
,
including:
•
Addition of Special Interest Directors
to the board.
•
Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock.
Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
•
Classification of Boards,
Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
•
Fair Price Amendments,
other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
•
Golden Parachutes,
that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
•
Poison Pills.
Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
•
Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights
(
e.g.
, action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
•
Reincorporation
in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
•
Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects
of merger and acquisition proposals.
•
Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board
that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
•
Supermajority Voting Requirements
(i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
•
Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR
proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to
Opt
Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST
the introduction of new classes of
Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST
introduction and FOR elimination of
Cumulative Voting Rights,
except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR
elimination of
Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR
Anti-Greenmail
proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR
charter and by-law amendments expanding the
Indemnification of Directors
to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote
AGAINST
charter and by-law amendments completely
Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR
proposals to adopt
Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation
practices.
XII. Vote FOR
Open-Market
Stock Repurchase Programs
, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR
management proposals to implement a
Reverse Stock Split
when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR
management proposals to
Reduce the Par Value
of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR
the
Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock
if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST
Excessive Increases in Common Stock.
Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST
the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a
Stock Option Plan
if:
• The
stock option plan
includes
evergreen provisions,
which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The
offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value
on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
•
The plan is administered by
(1) a
compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors
or (2) a
board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors,
provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The
plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval,
unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
•
Liberal Definition of Change in Control:
the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST
the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has
repriced outstanding options
.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to
Reprice Outstanding Stock Options
,
taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST
adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for
Restricted Stock Awards
("RSA")
if:
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST
Omnibus Stock Plans
if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST
Stock Awards
(other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs
or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs,
and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder
proposals on other
Compensation Plans or Practices
if such plans or practices are
Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders.
In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals
. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII.
Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access
which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||
Fidelity® Mid Cap Index Fund
|
Fidelity® Small Cap Index Fund
|
|||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
31,146,882
|
$
|
130,602,478
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
18,431,267
|
$
|
90,787,893
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
1,256,841
|
$
|
3,871,429
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
19,688,108
|
$
|
94,659,322
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
11,458,774
|
$
|
35,943,156
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
FHOFX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
29%
|
40%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
5,622
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
4,783
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
5,504
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
23,789,917
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
213
|
$
|
191
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
230
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
188
|
$
|
36
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
-
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
2023
(A)
|
$
|
202,127
|
2022
|
$
|
188,470
|
|
2021
(B)
|
$
|
119,211
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0290% to 0.0280%.
|
(B) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.03% to 0.0290%.
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
•
Attendance.
The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
•
Independent Directors.
Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
•
Director Responsiveness.
The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
•
Golden Parachutes.
Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
•
Gender Diversity.
If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
•
Overboarding.
The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
•
Unequal Voting Rights.
If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In
Other Circumstances
when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election.
Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
•
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
•
Frequency Vote.
Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
•
Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute.
Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST
Anti-Takeover Proposals
,
including:
•
Addition of Special Interest Directors
to the board.
•
Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock.
Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
•
Classification of Boards,
Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
•
Fair Price Amendments,
other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
•
Golden Parachutes,
that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
•
Poison Pills.
Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
•
Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights
(
e.g.
, action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
•
Reincorporation
in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
•
Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects
of merger and acquisition proposals.
•
Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board
that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
•
Supermajority Voting Requirements
(i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
•
Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR
proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to
Opt
Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST
the introduction of new classes of
Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST
introduction and FOR elimination of
Cumulative Voting Rights,
except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR
elimination of
Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR
Anti-Greenmail
proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR
charter and by-law amendments expanding the
Indemnification of Directors
to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote
AGAINST
charter and by-law amendments completely
Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR
proposals to adopt
Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation
practices.
XII. Vote FOR
Open-Market
Stock Repurchase Programs
, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR
management proposals to implement a
Reverse Stock Split
when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR
management proposals to
Reduce the Par Value
of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR
the
Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock
if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST
Excessive Increases in Common Stock.
Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST
the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a
Stock Option Plan
if:
• The
stock option plan
includes
evergreen provisions,
which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The
offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value
on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
•
The plan is administered by
(1) a
compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors
or (2) a
board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors,
provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The
plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval,
unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
•
Liberal Definition of Change in Control:
the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST
the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has
repriced outstanding options
.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to
Reprice Outstanding Stock Options
,
taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST
adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for
Restricted Stock Awards
("RSA")
if:
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST
Omnibus Stock Plans
if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST
Stock Awards
(other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs
or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs,
and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder
proposals on other
Compensation Plans or Practices
if such plans or practices are
Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders.
In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals
. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII.
Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access
which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
FSPGX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
12%
|
14%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
60,988
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
35,920
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
56,835
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
330,313,392
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$50,001-$100,000
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
none
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
3,022
|
$
|
2,707
|
$
|
2,646
|
$
|
3,268
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
$
|
2,672
|
$
|
531
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
-
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
5,245
|
$
|
3,515,397
|
2022
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
3,063,269
|
|
2021
|
$
|
217
|
$
|
1,965,869
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Growth Index Fund
|
2023
(A)
|
$
|
2,879,111
|
2022
|
$
|
2,558,587
|
|
2021
(B)
|
$
|
1,661,837
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0290% to 0.0280%.
|
(B) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.03% to 0.0290%.
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
•
Attendance.
The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
•
Independent Directors.
Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
•
Director Responsiveness.
The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
•
Golden Parachutes.
Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
•
Gender Diversity.
If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
•
Overboarding.
The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
•
Unequal Voting Rights.
If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In
Other Circumstances
when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election.
Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
•
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
•
Frequency Vote.
Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
•
Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute.
Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST
Anti-Takeover Proposals
,
including:
•
Addition of Special Interest Directors
to the board.
•
Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock.
Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
•
Classification of Boards,
Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
•
Fair Price Amendments,
other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
•
Golden Parachutes,
that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
•
Poison Pills.
Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
•
Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights
(
e.g.
, action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
•
Reincorporation
in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
•
Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects
of merger and acquisition proposals.
•
Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board
that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
•
Supermajority Voting Requirements
(i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
•
Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR
proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to
Opt
Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST
the introduction of new classes of
Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST
introduction and FOR elimination of
Cumulative Voting Rights,
except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR
elimination of
Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR
Anti-Greenmail
proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR
charter and by-law amendments expanding the
Indemnification of Directors
to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote
AGAINST
charter and by-law amendments completely
Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR
proposals to adopt
Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation
practices.
XII. Vote FOR
Open-Market
Stock Repurchase Programs
, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR
management proposals to implement a
Reverse Stock Split
when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR
management proposals to
Reduce the Par Value
of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR
the
Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock
if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST
Excessive Increases in Common Stock.
Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST
the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a
Stock Option Plan
if:
• The
stock option plan
includes
evergreen provisions,
which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The
offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value
on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
•
The plan is administered by
(1) a
compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors
or (2) a
board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors,
provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The
plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval,
unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
•
Liberal Definition of Change in Control:
the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST
the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has
repriced outstanding options
.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to
Reprice Outstanding Stock Options
,
taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST
adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for
Restricted Stock Awards
("RSA")
if:
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST
Omnibus Stock Plans
if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST
Stock Awards
(other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs
or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs,
and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder
proposals on other
Compensation Plans or Practices
if such plans or practices are
Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders.
In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals
. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII.
Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access
which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
FLCOX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
16%
|
16%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
Bank of America Corp.
|
$
|
65,811,338
|
Citigroup, Inc.
|
$
|
29,158,406
|
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
$
|
36,049,523
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
$
|
129,040,404
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
$
|
35,500,003
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
33,336
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
48,467
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
44,554
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
$
|
26,101,534
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
none
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
$
|
1,662
|
$
|
1,487
|
$
|
1,455
|
$
|
1,797
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
$
|
1,469
|
$
|
256
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
-
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
GOLDMAN SACHS & CO LLC
|
SALT LAKE CITY
|
UT
|
8.41%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,946
|
$
|
1,890,615
|
2022
|
$
|
78
|
$
|
1,570,386
|
|
2021
|
$
|
195
|
$
|
931,112
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Large Cap Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,500,860
|
2022
|
$
|
1,243,807
|
|
2021
(A)
|
$
|
747,469
|
(A) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0285% to 0.0275%.
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,668
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment
Companies
*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$851,323
|
$96,853
|
$3,459
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
•
Attendance.
The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
•
Independent Directors.
Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
•
Director Responsiveness.
The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
•
Golden Parachutes.
Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
•
Gender Diversity.
If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
•
Overboarding.
The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
•
Unequal Voting Rights.
If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In
Other Circumstances
when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election.
Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
•
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
•
Frequency Vote.
Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
•
Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute.
Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST
Anti-Takeover Proposals
,
including:
•
Addition of Special Interest Directors
to the board.
•
Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock.
Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
•
Classification of Boards,
Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
•
Fair Price Amendments,
other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
•
Golden Parachutes,
that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
•
Poison Pills.
Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
•
Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights
(
e.g.
, action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
•
Reincorporation
in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
•
Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects
of merger and acquisition proposals.
•
Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board
that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
•
Supermajority Voting Requirements
(i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
•
Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR
proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to
Opt
Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST
the introduction of new classes of
Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST
introduction and FOR elimination of
Cumulative Voting Rights,
except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR
elimination of
Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR
Anti-Greenmail
proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR
charter and by-law amendments expanding the
Indemnification of Directors
to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote
AGAINST
charter and by-law amendments completely
Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR
proposals to adopt
Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation
practices.
XII. Vote FOR
Open-Market
Stock Repurchase Programs
, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR
management proposals to implement a
Reverse Stock Split
when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR
management proposals to
Reduce the Par Value
of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR
the
Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock
if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST
Excessive Increases in Common Stock.
Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST
the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a
Stock Option Plan
if:
• The
stock option plan
includes
evergreen provisions,
which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The
offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value
on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
•
The plan is administered by
(1) a
compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors
or (2) a
board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors,
provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The
plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval,
unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
•
Liberal Definition of Change in Control:
the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST
the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has
repriced outstanding options
.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to
Reprice Outstanding Stock Options
,
taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST
adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for
Restricted Stock Awards
("RSA")
if:
• The
dilution effect
of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is
greater than 10%.
However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST
Omnibus Stock Plans
if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST
Stock Awards
(other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs
or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs,
and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder
proposals on other
Compensation Plans or Practices
if such plans or practices are
Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders.
In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals
. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII.
Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access
which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
Post-Effective Amendment No. 563
PART C. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 28.
Exhibits
(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(b)
(c)
Not applicable.
(d)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
(143)
(144)
(145)
(e)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(f)
(g)
(1)
Custodian Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, between The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon) and Fidelity Salem Street Trust on behalf of Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund, Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Municipal Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity Municipal Income 2023 Fund, Fidelity Municipal Income 2025 Fund, Fidelity SAI International Credit Fund, Fidelity SAI International Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund, Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Bond Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Money Market Fund, Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Tax-Free Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Series Government Money Market Fund, Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund, Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund, Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund, and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(1) of Fidelity Advisor Series IVs (File No. 002-83672) Post-Effective Amendment No. 88.
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
(h)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(i)
Legal Opinion of Dechert LLP, dated June 22, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (i).
(j)
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated June 22, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (j).
(k)
Not applicable.
(l)
Not applicable.
(m)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
(143)
(n)
(1)
(2)
(p)
(1)
(2)
Item 29.
Trusts Controlled by or under Common Control with this Trust
The Board of Trustees of the Trust is the same as the board of other Fidelity funds, each of which has Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, or an affiliate, or Geode Capital Management LLC, as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Trust are substantially identical to those of the other Fidelity funds. Nonetheless, the Trust takes the position that it is not under common control with other Fidelity funds because the power residing in the respective boards and officers arises as the result of an official position with the respective trusts.
Item 30.
Indemnification
Article XI, Section 2 of the Declaration of Trust sets forth the reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification shall be provided to any past or present Trustee or officer. It states that the Trust shall indemnify any present or past trustee or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability, and all expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of his or her service as a trustee or officer and against any amount incurred in settlement thereof. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudged by a court or other adjudicatory body to be liable to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of his or her duties (collectively, disabling conduct), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination, as specified in the Declaration of Trust, that the officer or trustee did not engage in disabling conduct.
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Distributor and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Trust (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Trust does not agree to indemnify the Distributor or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Trust by or on behalf of the Distributor. In no case is the indemnity of the Trust in favor of the Distributor or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Distributor or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which the Distributor or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
Pursuant to the agreement by which Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC (FIIOC) is appointed transfer agent, the Registrant agrees to indemnify and hold FIIOC harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) resulting from:
(1)
any claim, demand, action, or suit brought by any person other than the Registrant, including by a shareholder, which names FIIOC and/or the Registrant as a party and is not based on and does not result from FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties, and arises out of or in connection with FIIOCs performance under the Transfer Agency Agreement; or
(2)
any claim, demand, action or suit (except to the extent contributed to by FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties) which results from the negligence of the Registrant, or from FIIOCs acting upon any instruction(s) reasonably believed by it to have been executed or communicated by any person duly authorized by the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon advice reasonably believed by FIIOC to have been given by counsel for the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon any instrument or stock certificate reasonably believed by it to have been genuine and signed, countersigned or executed by the proper person.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Registrant, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Item 31.
Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser(s)
(1) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC (FMR)
FMR serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies. The directors and officers of the Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Abigail P. Johnson |
Chairman of the Board of certain Trusts; Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR LLC; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. Previously served as Chairman of the Board and Director FMRC. |
Peter S. Lynch |
Vice Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and a member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR. Previously served as Vice Chairman and Director of FMRC. |
Cynthia Lo Bessette |
Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; Secretary Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022); Previously served as Senior Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer FMRC; Secretary SelectCo, LLC and FIMM; Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher Rimmer |
Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Lisa D. Krieser |
Assistant Secretary Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and Fidelity Distributors Company LLC, Secretary FMR Capital, Inc and Strategic Advisers LLC (2022). |
Bart Grenier |
President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. |
Margaret Serravalli |
Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR). |
Michael Shulman |
Assistant Treasurer Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) (2022), Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022), FIMM (2022), Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FMR LLC (2023), FMR Capital, Inc. (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Executive Vice President, Tax of FMR LLC (2023). |
Stephanie J. Brown |
Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jason Pogorelec |
Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023). |
Margaret Carey |
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(2) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (HONG KONG) LIMITED (FMR H.K.)
FMR H.K. provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Sharon Yau Lecornu |
Chief Executive Officer of FMR H.K., Executive Director of FMR H.K., Director of Investment Services Asia, and Director of FMR H.K. |
||
William Francis Shanley III |
Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. |
||
Christopher J. Seabolt |
Director of FMR H.K. and FMR UK. |
||
Adrian James Tyerman |
Compliance Officer FMR H.K. and FMR UK, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
||
Christopher Rimmer |
Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
||
Stephanie J. Brown |
Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
||
Margaret Carey |
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(3) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (JAPAN) LIMITED (FMR JAPAN)
FMR Japan provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Timothy M. Cohen |
Director of FMR Japan; Executive Vice President SelectCo, LLC. |
Risteard Hogan |
Director of FMR Japan. |
Rieko Hirai |
Director of FMR Japan. |
Kan Man Wong |
Director of FMR Japan. |
Kirk Roland Neureiter |
Director of FMR Japan. |
William Francis Shanley III |
Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. |
Koichi Iwabuchi |
Statutory Auditor of FMR Japan; Previously served as Compliance Officer of FMR Japan. |
Ryo Sato |
Compliance Officer of FMR Japan. |
Christopher Rimmer |
Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Stephanie J. Brown |
Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Margaret Carey |
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(4) FMR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (UK) LIMITED (FMR UK)
FMR UK provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Mark D. Flaherty |
Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Niamh Brodie-Machura |
Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher J. Seabolt |
Director of FMR H.K. and FMR UK. |
Adrian James Tyerman |
Compliance Officer FMR H.K. Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Stephanie J. Brown |
Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jean-Philippe Provost |
Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023). |
Margaret Carey |
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
|
|
(5) GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC (Geode)
Geode serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies AND OTHER ACCOUNTS. Geode may also provide investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
David Lane |
President and Chief Executive Officer (2023). |
Jeffrey S. Miller |
Chief Operating Officer. |
Joseph Ciardi |
Chief Compliance Officer. |
Sorin Codreanu |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
Matt Nevins |
General Counsel. |
Lionel Harris |
Director (2021). |
Franklin Corning Kenly |
Director. |
Arlene Rockefeller |
Director. |
Eric Roiter |
Director. |
Jennifer Uhrig |
Director. |
Philip L. Bullen |
Director. |
Thomas Sprague |
Director. |
Michael Even |
Director. |
Alok Kapoor |
Director (2022). |
Robert Minicus |
Director. |
Principal business addresses of the investment adviser, sub-advisers and affiliates.
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.)
Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central
Hong Kong
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (FMR Japan)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (FMR UK)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FIL Investment Advisors (FIA)
Pembroke Hall
42 Crow Lane
Pembroke HM19, Bermuda
FIL Investment Advisors (UK) Limited (FIA(UK))
Beech Gate Millfield Lane
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey
KT20 6RP, United Kingdom
FIL Investments (Japan) Limited (FIJ)
Tri Seven Roppongi
7-7-7 Roppongi, Minato-ku,
Tokyo, Japan 106-0032
Strategic Advisers LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC)
900 Salem Street
Smithfield, RI 02917
Geode Capital Management, LLC (Geode)
100 Summer Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Fidelity Management Trust Company
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Investors Management LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Item 32.
Principal Underwriters
(a)
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) acts as distributor for all funds advised by FMR or an affiliate, as well as Fidelity Commodity Strategy Central Fund and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund.
(b) |
|
|
Name and Principal |
Positions and Offices |
Positions and Offices |
Business Address* |
with Underwriter |
with Fund |
Robert Adams |
Chief Operating Officer (2021) |
None |
Robert F. Bachman |
Executive Vice President and Director (2023) |
None |
Dalton Gustafson |
President (2021) and Director (2023) |
None |
Natalie Kavanaugh |
Chief Legal Officer |
None |
Michael Lyons |
Chief Financial Officer |
None |
John McGinty |
Chief Compliance Officer (2021) |
None |
Timothy Mulcahy |
Director |
None |
Michael Kearney |
Treasurer |
None |
Natalie Kavanaugh |
Secretary |
None |
Lisa D. Krieser |
Assistant Secretary |
None |
Michael Shulman |
Assistant Treasurer (2022) |
None |
* 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI
(c)
Not applicable.
Item 33.
Location of Accounts and Records
All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder are maintained by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC or Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC, 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210, or the funds respective custodians, or special purpose custodian, as applicable, The Bank of New York Mellon, 1 Wall Street, New York, NY; Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., 50 Post Office Square, Boston, MA; Citibank, N.A., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY, 10013; State Street Bank & Trust Company, 1 Lincoln Street, Boston, MA; and The Northern Trust Company, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60675.
Item 34.
Management Services
Not applicable.
Item 35.
Undertakings
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 563 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 27th day of June 2023.
|
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
||
|
By |
/s/Laura M. Del Prato |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Signature) |
|
(Title) |
(Date) |
|
|
|
|
/s/Laura M. Del Prato |
|
President and Treasurer |
June 27, 2023 |
Laura M. Del Prato |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John J. Burke III |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
June 27, 2023 |
John J. Burke III |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Abigail P. Johnson |
|
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Abigail P. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Elizabeth S. Acton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Ann E. Dunwoody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jonathan Chiel |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Jonathan Chiel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John Engler |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
John Engler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Arthur E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Michael E. Kenneally |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Mark A. Murray |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Mark A. Murray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
* |
Trustee |
June 27, 2023 |
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Stephanie J. Brown |
|
|
Stephanie J. Brown, pursuant to a power of attorney dated January 26, 2023 and filed herewith. |
* |
By: |
/s/Megan C. Johnson |
|
|
Megan C. Johnson, pursuant to powers of attorney dated October 5, 2016 and January 11, 2023 and filed herewith. |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV |
Fidelity Newbury Street Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity New York Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC |
Fidelity Oxford Street Trust |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Fidelity Phillips Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Union Street Trust |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Union Street Trust II |
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
|
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Trustee (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby constitute and appoint Stephanie J. Brown, my true and lawful attorney- in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post- Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorney-in-fact deems necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact or her substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect only for such time as Stephanie J. Brown shall continue to be an officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, this Power of Attorney may be revoked at any time by the undersigned in writing.
This Power of Attorney has been executed as of January 26, 2023.
/s/ Abigail P. Johnson
Abigail P. Johnson
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment company:
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Director or Trustee (collectively, the Funds), hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, Marc R. Bryant, John V. OHanlon, Robert W. Helm, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after October 5, 2016.
WITNESS my hand on this 5th day of October, 2016.
/s/Jonathan Chiel |
|
Jonathan Chiel |
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust Fidelity Advisor Series II Fidelity Advisor Series IV Fidelity Boylston Street Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust II Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC Fidelity Charles Street Trust Fidelity Colchester Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust II Fidelity Garrison Street Trust Fidelity Hereford Street Trust Fidelity Income Fund Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Money Market Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust II Fidelity Newbury Street Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II Fidelity Oxford Street Trust Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II Fidelity Phillips Street Trust Fidelity Revere Street Trust Fidelity Salem Street Trust Fidelity School Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust II Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the Funds), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment company for which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, John V. OHanlon, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after January 11, 2023.
WITNESS our hands on this eleventh day of January 2023.
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton |
/s/Michael E. Kenneally |
Elizabeth S. Acton |
Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody |
/s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
Ann E. Dunwoody |
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
/s/John Engler |
/s/Mark A. Murray |
John Engler |
Mark A. Murray |
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland |
|
Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson |
|
Arthur E. Johnson |
|
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV |
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax- Free Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 20% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 30% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 50% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 60% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Government Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Money Market Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Tax-Exempt Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Only Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Treasury Only Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/11/2021 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity GNMA Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Government Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
05/14/2020 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Municipal Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/07/2019 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/08/2018 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
08/29/2017 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
05/14/2020 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Low Duration Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Tax-Free Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/08/2018 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/08/2018 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
11/19/2015 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
07/20/2017 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Strategic Dividend and Income Fund |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
01/18/2018 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/10/2022 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
11/18/2021 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
05/14/2015 |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Global Credit Fund |
Fixed Income |
04/19/2012 |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Union Street Trust |
Fidelity Arizona Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Union Street Trust |
Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Union Street Trust II |
Fidelity Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Asset Manager Portfolio |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Asset Manager: Growth Portfolio |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Bond Index Portfolio |
Fixed Income |
04/16/2018 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Government Money Market Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Investment Grade Bond Portfolio |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Strategic Income Portfolio |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Investment Grade Bond II Portfolio |
Fixed Income |
01/20/2022 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer
Title: Treasurer
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited
By: /s/Sharon LeCornu
Name: Sharon LeCornu
Title: Director
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
01/18/2017 |
12.50 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
01/18/2017 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
01/18/2017 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer |
By: /s/Sharon LeCornu |
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer |
Name: Sharon LeCornu |
Title: Treasurer |
Title: Director |
- -
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund |
01/17/2019 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Government Money Market Fund |
01/14/2016 |
7.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund |
09/18/2008 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
04/14/2016 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Series International Developed Markets Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
3.0 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited |
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer By:
/s/Sharon LeCornu
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer Name:
Sharon LeCornu
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
Schedule B
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
|
|
|
0.5 x (individual fund fee rate + group fee rate) |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Sustainable Investment Grade Bond Fund |
01/19/2023 |
0.5 x (20 bp + group fee rate) |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Series International Credit Fund |
07/25/2017 |
0.5 x (45 bp + group fee rate) |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited |
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer
By:
/s/Sharon LeCornu
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer
Name:
Sharon LeCornu
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV |
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 20% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 30% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 50% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 60% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% |
Asset Allocation |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Government Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Money Market Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Tax-Exempt Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Only Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Portfolio |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Treasury Only Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/11/2021 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity GNMA Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Government Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
09/09/2008 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer
Title: Treasurer
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited
By: /s/Kirk Roland Neureiter
Name: Kirk Roland Neureiter Title: Director
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
01/18/2017 |
12.50 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
01/18/2017 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
01/18/2017 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer |
By: /s/Kirk Roland Neureiter |
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer |
Name: Kirk Roland Neureiter |
Title: Treasurer |
Title: Director |
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund |
01/17/2019 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Government Money Market Fund |
01/14/2016 |
7.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund |
09/18/2008 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
04/14/2016 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Series International Developed Markets Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
3.0 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited |
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer
By:
/s/Kirk Roland Neureiter
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer
Name:
Kirk Roland Neureiter
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
Schedule B
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
|
|
|
0.5 x (individual fund fee rate + group fee rate) |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Sustainable Investment Grade Bond Fund |
01/19/2023 |
0.5 x (20 bp + group fee rate) |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Series International Credit Fund |
07/25/2017 |
0.5 x (45 bp + group fee rate) |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited |
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer
By:
/s/Kirk Roland Neureiter
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer
Name:
Kirk Roland Neureiter
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV |
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 20% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 30% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 50% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 60% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust |
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% |
Asset Allocation |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Government Portfolio |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Money Market Portfolio |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Tax-Exempt Portfolio |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Only Portfolio |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust |
Treasury Portfolio |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II |
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust |
Fidelity Education Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
11/19/2020 |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust |
Fidelity Money Market Central Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust |
VIP Investment Grade Central Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Treasury Only Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
03/11/2021 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity GNMA Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Government Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Total Bond Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity MA Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity MA Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF |
Fixed Income |
09/18/2014 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF |
Fixed Income |
11/19/2020 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF |
Fixed Income |
11/19/2020 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF |
Fixed Income |
09/18/2014 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF |
Fixed Income |
03/08/2018 |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
Fidelity Total Bond ETF |
Fixed Income |
09/18/2014 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity New York Municipal Trust |
Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund |
Fixed Income |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity New York Municipal Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Newbury Street Trust |
Fidelity Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Newbury Street Trust |
Fidelity Treasury Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Phillips Street Trust |
Fidelity Government Cash Reserves |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Cash Central Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Securities Lending Cash Central Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Tax-Free Cash Central Fund |
Money Market |
06/19/2008 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer
Title: Treasurer
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited
By: /s/Mark D. Flaherty
Name: Mark D. Flaherty
Title: Director
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Type of Fund |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Government Money Market Fund |
Money Market |
1/18/2017 |
12.50 |
Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
4/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund |
Fixed-Income |
4/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
1/18/2017 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund |
Fixed-Income |
1/18/2017 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited |
|
|
|
|
By: /s/Christopher J. Rimmer |
By: /s/Mark D. Flaherty |
Name: Christopher J. Rimmer |
Name: Mark D. Flaherty |
Title: Treasurer |
Title: Director |
- -
Schedule A
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited
Name of Trust |
Name of Portfolio |
Effective Date |
Annual Sub-Advisory Fee Rate (bp) |
Fidelity Advisor Series II |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Income Fund |
Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund |
07/19/2018 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
2.5 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Bond Index Fund |
01/17/2019 |
1.25 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund |
07/19/2018 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Government Money Market Fund |
01/14/2016 |
7.00 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund |
09/18/2008 |
17.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund |
04/14/2016 |
1.50 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund |
04/01/2023 |
10.00 |
Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Series International Developed Markets Bond Index Fund |
05/13/2021 |
3.0 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited |
|
|
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer
By:
/s/Mark D. Flaherty
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer
Name:
Mark D. Flaherty
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
Schedule B
Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement
between
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC
and
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC |
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited |
|
|
By:
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer
By:
/s/Mark D. Flaherty
Name:
Christopher J. Rimmer
Name:
Mark D. Flaherty
Title:
Treasurer
Title:
Director
- -
Schedule A
Name of Trust |
Name of Fund/Class |
Basis Point Expense Rate |
Expiration Date |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust |
Fidelity 500 Index Fund |
1.5 |
04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust |
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund |
3.5 |
04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust |
Fidelity International Index Fund |
3.5 |
04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust |
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund |
1.5 |
04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund |
7.5 |
12/31/2023 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund |
5.5 |
12/31/2023 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund |
3.5 |
06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund |
3.5 |
06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund |
2.5 |
06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund |
2.5 |
06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund |
2.5 |
10/31/2023 |
|
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/Christopher J. Rimmer |
|
|
Christopher J. Rimmer |
|
|
|
|
FIDELITY CONCORD STREET TRUST, |
|
|
on behalf of the Funds listed on Schedule A |
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/Stacie M. Smith |
|
|
Stacie M. Smith |
|
|
|
|
FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST, |
|
|
on behalf of the Funds listed on Schedule A |
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/Laura M. Del Prato |
|
|
Laura M. Del Prato |
Dechert LLP
One International Place, 40th Floor
100 Oliver Street
Boston, MA 02110-2605
+1 617 728 7100 Main
+1 617 426 6567 Fax
www.dechert.com
June 22, 2023
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Re: Post-Effective Amendment No. 563 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel to Fidelity Salem Street Trust, a Massachusetts business trust (the Trust) and its separate series Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund, Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund, Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund, Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund, Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund, Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund, and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (the Funds), in connection with Post-Effective Amendment No. 563 to the Trusts Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the Amendment) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
In connection with the opinions set forth herein, you have provided to us originals, copies or facsimile transmissions of, and we have reviewed and relied upon, among other things, copies of the following: the Amendment; the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust dated May 16, 2001, as amended; the By-Laws of the Trust dated June 17, 2004 (the By-Laws); and other such Trust records, certificates, resolutions, documents and statutes that we have deemed relevant in order to render the opinion expressed herein. In addition, we have reviewed and relied upon a Certificate issued by the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
In rendering this opinion we have assumed, without independent verification, (i) the due authority of all individuals signing in representative capacities and the genuineness of signatures; (ii) the authenticity, completeness and continued effectiveness of all documents or copies furnished to us; (iii) that any resolutions provided have been duly adopted by the Trusts Board of Trustees;
(iv) that the facts contained in the instruments and certificates or statements of public officials, officers and representatives of the Trust on which we have relied for the purposes of this opinion are true and correct; and (v) that no amendments, agreements, resolutions or actions have been approved, executed or adopted which would limit, supersede or modify the items described above. Where documents are referred to in resolutions approved by the Board of Trustees, or in the Amendment, we have assumed such documents are the same as in the most recent form provided to us, whether as an exhibit to the Amendment or otherwise. When any opinion set forth below relates to the existence or standing of the Trust, such opinion is based entirely upon and is limited by the items referred to above, and we understand that the foregoing assumptions, limitations and qualifications are acceptable to you.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Funds shares registered under the Securities Act, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of purchase described in the Amendment, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
The opinion expressed herein is given as of the date hereof and we undertake no obligation and hereby disclaim any obligation to advise you of any change after the date of this opinion pertaining to any matter referred to herein. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Amendment and to the use of our name in the Amendment unless and until we revoke such consent. In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Dechert LLP
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this PostEffective Amendment to Registration Statement No. 002-41839 on Form N1A of our reports dated June 12, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund, Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund, and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund, our reports dated June 13, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund and Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund, and our report dated June 14, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund, each a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of Fidelity Salem Street Trust for the year ended April 30, 2023, and to the references to us under the headings Financial Highlights in the Prospectuses and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of such Registration Statement.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 22, 2023