Securities Act of 1933 Registration No. 002-41839
Investment Company Act of 1940 Registration No. 811-02105
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 [X]
[ ] Pre-Effective Amendment No. ______
[X] Post-Effective Amendment No. 567
and
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 [X]
[X] Amendment No. 567
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: 617-563-7000
Margaret Carey, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
It is proposed that this filing will become effective on September 29, 2023 pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time.
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.10%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.02%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.12%
|
1 year
|
$
|
12
|
3 years
|
$
|
39
|
5 years
|
$
|
68
|
10 years
|
$
|
154
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-10.71%
|
29.09%
|
-4.44%
|
30.41%
|
-3.69%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
18.54%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-31.76%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
3.50%
|
June 30, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
0.10%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
12.13
|
$
|
12.22
|
$
|
8.82
|
$
|
10.06
|
$
|
10.36
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.32
|
.31
|
.31
|
.29
|
.25
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.40 C
|
.31
|
3.35
|
(1.27)
|
(.22)
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.72
|
.62
|
3.66
|
(.98)
|
.03
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.38)
|
(.28)
|
(.26)
|
(.26)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(.99)
|
(.42)
|
-
|
-
|
(.14)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(1.37)
|
(.71) D
|
(.26)
|
(.26)
|
(.33)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.48
|
$
|
12.13
|
$
|
12.22
|
$
|
8.82
|
$
|
10.06
|
Total Return E,F
|
6.74%
|
5.21%
|
42.39%
|
(10.13)%
|
.62%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets A,G,H
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.12%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.21%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.12%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.12%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.90%
|
2.49%
|
2.89%
|
3.12%
|
2.61%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
392,338
|
$
|
2,952,541
|
$
|
3,589,260
|
$
|
2,282,301
|
$
|
1,788,140
|
Portfolio turnover rate I
|
86%
|
62%
|
80%
|
82%
|
99%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9885510.107
|
USV-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.10%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.01%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.11%
|
1 year
|
$
|
11
|
3 years
|
$
|
35
|
5 years
|
$
|
62
|
10 years
|
$
|
141
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-1.40%
|
24.16%
|
29.98%
|
22.63%
|
-15.78%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
23.27%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-16.82%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
1.87%
|
June 30, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
0.10%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
13.95
|
$
|
19.05
|
$
|
15.74
|
$
|
13.77
|
$
|
13.31
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.30
|
.19
|
.10
|
.19
|
.20
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.52 C
|
(1.81)
|
4.66
|
2.07
|
.71 D
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.82
|
(1.62)
|
4.76
|
2.26
|
.91
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.29)
|
(.10)
|
(.18)
|
(.22)
|
(.12)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(3.38)
|
(1.27)
|
(.08)
|
(.33)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.29)
|
(3.48)
|
(1.45)
|
(.29) E
|
(.45)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
14.48
|
$
|
13.95
|
$
|
19.05
|
$
|
15.74
|
$
|
13.77
|
Total Return F
|
5.99% C
|
(11.06)%
|
32.98%
|
16.76%
|
6.94% D
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,G,H
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.21%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.15%
|
1.25%
|
.58%
|
1.36%
|
1.54%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
334,910
|
$
|
4,524,235
|
$
|
2,908,860
|
$
|
1,798,387
|
$
|
3,655,491
|
Portfolio turnover rate I
|
85%
|
138%
|
128%
|
163%
|
161%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9878812.107
|
SY1-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.10%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.01%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.11%
|
1 year
|
$
|
11
|
3 years
|
$
|
35
|
5 years
|
$
|
62
|
10 years
|
$
|
141
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||
7.82%
|
25.75%
|
-2.75%
|
34.07%
|
20.67%
|
28.33%
|
-18.09%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
21.40%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-15.33%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
17.90%
|
June 30, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
0.10%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
16.49
|
$
|
19.24
|
$
|
15.96
|
$
|
15.19
|
$
|
14.23
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.23
|
.23
|
.22
|
.26
|
.25
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
2.20
|
(1.36)
|
4.58
|
2.45
|
1.10
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
2.43
|
(1.13)
|
4.80
|
2.71
|
1.35
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.22)
|
(.20)
|
(.28)
|
(.24)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(1.42)
|
(1.25)
|
(1.69)
|
(.20)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.22)
|
(1.62)
|
(1.52) C
|
(1.94) C
|
(.39)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
18.70
|
$
|
16.49
|
$
|
19.24
|
$
|
15.96
|
$
|
15.19
|
Total Return D
|
14.97%
|
(6.55)%
|
32.64%
|
20.14%
|
9.70%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.11%
|
.10%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.19%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.11%
|
.10%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.11%
|
.10%
|
.10%
|
.11%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.43%
|
1.30%
|
1.30%
|
1.83%
|
1.76%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
13,073,529
|
$
|
11,408,951
|
$
|
10,136,091
|
$
|
8,332,335
|
$
|
8,732,756
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
58%
|
47%
|
71%
|
60%
|
99%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9867024.108
|
SV4-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.07%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.09%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.16%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.09% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.07%
|
1 year
|
$
|
7
|
3 years
|
$
|
39
|
5 years
|
$
|
78
|
10 years
|
$
|
192
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
3.73%
|
-4.18%
|
23.06%
|
-11.10%
|
40.62%
|
-26.14%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
15.68%
|
March 31, 2019
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-28.46%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
3.56%
|
June 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-26.14%
|
1.72%
|
3.47%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-32.83%
|
-1.19%
|
0.99%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-10.54%
|
1.26%
|
2.50%
|
MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-26.12%
|
4.22%
|
-%
|
Fidelity Real Estate Linked Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-26.12%
|
1.72%
|
3.50%
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
March, June, September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
0.07%
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
11.98
|
$
|
13.17
|
$
|
9.67
|
$
|
11.88
|
$
|
11.11
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.26
|
.29
|
.28
|
.36
|
.37
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(1.38)
|
(.79)
|
3.48
|
(2.20)
|
.79
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(1.12)
|
(.50)
|
3.76
|
(1.84)
|
1.16
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.34)
|
(.21)
|
(.26)
|
(.30)
|
(.37)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(3.39)
|
(.48)
|
-
|
(.07)
|
(.02)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(3.73)
|
(.69)
|
(.26)
|
(.37)
|
(.39)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
7.13
|
$
|
11.98
|
$
|
13.17
|
$
|
9.67
|
$
|
11.88
|
Total Return C
|
(9.67)%
|
(4.24)%
|
39.72%
|
(16.04)%
|
10.79%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.16%
|
.09%
|
.09%
|
.16%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.09%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.09%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.10%
|
2.28%
|
2.58%
|
3.52%
|
3.31%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
83,130
|
$
|
406,787
|
$
|
747,826
|
$
|
572,828
|
$
|
104,696
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
8%
|
13%
|
53%
|
82%
|
9%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9867769.108
|
SV8-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.015%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.016%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.031%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.016% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.015%
|
1 year
|
$
|
2
|
3 years
|
$
|
8
|
5 years
|
$
|
15
|
10 years
|
$
|
38
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
21.74%
|
-4.36%
|
31.53%
|
18.25%
|
28.71%
|
-18.13%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
20.61%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-19.72%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
16.84%
|
June 30, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
0.015%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
19.87
|
$
|
23.16
|
$
|
17.68
|
$
|
16.09
|
$
|
15.21
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.30
|
.30
|
.31
|
.32
|
.30
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.99
|
(1.23)
|
5.94
|
1.56
|
.87
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
2.29
|
(.93)
|
6.25
|
1.88
|
1.17
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.33)
|
(.34)
|
(.35)
|
(.29)
|
(.28)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(1.56)
|
(2.02)
|
(.42)
|
-
|
(.01)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(1.89)
|
(2.36)
|
(.77)
|
(.29)
|
(.29)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
20.27
|
$
|
19.87
|
$
|
23.16
|
$
|
17.68
|
$
|
16.09
|
Total Return C
|
12.98%
|
(4.68)%
|
36.43%
|
11.84%
|
7.97%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.03%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.09%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.03%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.03%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.66%
|
1.43%
|
1.52%
|
1.97%
|
2.00%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
10,170,243
|
$
|
12,126,586
|
$
|
13,967,770
|
$
|
15,406,444
|
$
|
14,046,976
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
75%
|
75%
|
86%
|
80%
|
41%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9867774.108
|
SV9-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.11%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.04%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.15%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.10% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.05%
|
1 year
|
$
|
5
|
3 years
|
$
|
35
|
5 years
|
$
|
71
|
10 years
|
$
|
178
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||
14.62%
|
18.40%
|
-9.25%
|
29.53%
|
19.77%
|
20.92%
|
-16.73%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
27.27%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-29.06%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
9.38%
|
June 30, 2023
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
0.11%
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
9.84
|
$
|
16.46
|
$
|
12.19
|
$
|
12.80
|
$
|
12.95
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.10
|
.16
|
.20
|
.20
|
.19
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.38
|
(1.07)
|
5.09
|
(.20) C
|
.46
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.48
|
(.91)
|
5.29
|
-
|
.65
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.11)
|
(.22)
|
(.17)
|
(.22)
|
(.18)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(4.15)
|
(5.48)
|
(.85)
|
(.39)
|
(.63)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(4.25) D
|
(5.71) D
|
(1.02)
|
(.61)
|
(.80) D
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
6.07
|
$
|
9.84
|
$
|
16.46
|
$
|
12.19
|
$
|
12.80
|
Total Return E
|
8.32%
|
(8.94)%
|
46.99%
|
(.03)% C
|
5.26%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,F,G
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.15%
|
.14%
|
.13%
|
.13%
|
.22%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.06%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.06%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.77%
|
1.35%
|
1.37%
|
1.66%
|
1.53%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
1,610,937
|
$
|
246,496
|
$
|
1,087,415
|
$
|
1,921,810
|
$
|
1,862,285
|
Portfolio turnover rate H
|
76%
|
93%
|
69%
|
79%
|
41%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9866047.108
|
SV3-PRO-0923
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.07%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.07%
|
1 year
|
$
|
7
|
3 years
|
$
|
23
|
5 years
|
$
|
40
|
10 years
|
$
|
90
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
1.37%
|
31.58%
|
4.39%
|
6.60%
|
3.75%
|
-4.21%
|
23.02%
|
-11.33%
|
40.66%
|
-26.12%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
15.72%
|
March 31, 2019
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-28.53%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
3.58%
|
June 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-26.12%
|
1.66%
|
5.27%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-26.71%
|
0.67%
|
4.13%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-15.29%
|
1.03%
|
3.76%
|
MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-26.12%
|
4.22%
|
-%
|
Fidelity Real Estate Linked Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-26.12%
|
1.72%
|
5.34%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
March, June, September, December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
September, December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
0.07%
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
Years ended July 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
17.43
|
$
|
18.44
|
$
|
13.58
|
$
|
16.82
|
$
|
15.76
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.49
|
.44
|
.39
|
.51
|
.53
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
(2.18)
|
(1.19)
|
4.88
|
(3.15)
|
1.13
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
(1.69)
|
(.75)
|
5.27
|
(2.64)
|
1.66
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.47)
|
(.26)
|
(.41)
|
(.47)
|
(.50)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(.13)
|
(.10)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.47)
|
(.26)
|
(.41)
|
(.60)
|
(.60)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
15.27
|
$
|
17.43
|
$
|
18.44
|
$
|
13.58
|
$
|
16.82
|
Total Return C
|
(9.70)%
|
(4.21)%
|
39.73%
|
(16.34)%
|
10.84%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets A,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.25%
|
2.45%
|
2.53%
|
3.32%
|
3.33%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
2,488,753
|
$
|
2,873,997
|
$
|
2,939,615
|
$
|
2,082,589
|
$
|
2,256,495
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
13%
|
10%
|
44%
|
26%
|
10%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.929339.113
|
URX-I-PRO-0923
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
FSWCX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
86%
|
62%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
Bank of America Corp.
|
$
|
13,937,184
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
$
|
10,730,065
|
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
$
|
7,431,989
|
|
Citigroup, Inc.
|
$
|
5,828,484
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
374,434
|
0.03%
|
2022
|
$
|
96,975
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
141,550
|
0.01%
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
none
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
$
|
480
|
$
|
367
|
$
|
427
|
$
|
422
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
$
|
475
|
$
|
430
|
$
|
414
|
$
|
512
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
$
|
421
|
$
|
88
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
13.32%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,324,435
|
2022
|
$
|
3,506,013
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,726,850
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
397,195
|
2022
|
$
|
1,051,728
|
|
2021
|
$
|
818,283
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
FUMIX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
85%
|
138%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
$
|
2,988,919
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
795,949
|
0.05%
|
2022
|
$
|
93,610
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
56,348
|
0.00%
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
631
|
$
|
471
|
$
|
562
|
$
|
553
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
624
|
$
|
564
|
$
|
542
|
$
|
672
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
552
|
$
|
42
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,650,392
|
2022
|
$
|
3,412,618
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,252,964
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund
|
2023(A)
|
$
|
470,415
|
2022
|
$
|
1,023,876
|
|
2021
|
$
|
675,915
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0300% to 0.0275%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
FZFLX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
76%
|
93%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
64,903
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
75,790
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
99,230
|
0.00%
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
$
|
257
|
$
|
223
|
$
|
229
|
$
|
230
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
$
|
257
|
$
|
238
|
$
|
221
|
$
|
279
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
$
|
228
|
$
|
139
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
70.87%
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® SMALL-MID CAP FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
29.06%
|
Fund Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
70.87%
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® SMALL-MID CAP FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
29.06%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,080,968
|
2022
|
$
|
758,081
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,257,875
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
|
2023(A)
|
$
|
334,616
|
2022(B)
|
$
|
241,082
|
|
2021
|
$
|
769,716
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0350% to 0.0340%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0375% to 0.0350%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
FUQIX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
58%
|
47%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
163,167
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
183,367
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
141,750
|
0.00%
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
3,353
|
$
|
2,759
|
$
|
2,990
|
$
|
2,974
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
3,344
|
$
|
3,074
|
$
|
2,880
|
$
|
3,612
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
2,960
|
$
|
1,202
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
84.23%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® LARGE CAP FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
5.36%
|
Fund Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
84.23%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
11,200,646
|
2022
|
$
|
10,854,340
|
|
2021
|
$
|
8,313,330
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,240,039
|
2022
|
$
|
2,171,168
|
|
2021
|
$
|
1,662,788
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
FESIX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
8%
|
13%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
23,534
|
0.02%
|
2022
|
$
|
10,697
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
29,890
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
12,168,511
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
43
|
$
|
29
|
$
|
38
|
$
|
37
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
42
|
$
|
38
|
$
|
37
|
$
|
45
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
37
|
$
|
9
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® SMALL-MID CAP FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
99.37%
|
Fund Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® SMALL-MID CAP FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
99.37%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
77,909
|
2022
|
$
|
458,792
|
|
2021
|
$
|
478,847
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023(A)
|
$
|
38,240
|
2022
|
$
|
229,426
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
241,127
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0350% to 0.0340%.
|
(B) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0370% to 0.0350%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
FLCPX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
75%
|
75%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
|
$
|
31,330,083
|
Morgan Stanley
|
$
|
31,588,108
|
|
Bank of America Corp.
|
$
|
58,761,792
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
$
|
122,259,144
|
|
Citigroup, Inc.
|
$
|
24,571,590
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
458,689
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
329,305
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
566,832
|
0.00%
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
3,263
|
$
|
2,666
|
$
|
2,909
|
$
|
2,894
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
3,252
|
$
|
2,988
|
$
|
2,807
|
$
|
3,513
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
$
|
2,880
|
$
|
1,144
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
9.06%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,592,488
|
2022
|
$
|
2,096,241
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,458,216
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
|
2023(A)
|
$
|
646,068
|
2022(B)
|
$
|
909,027
|
|
2021(C)
|
$
|
1,158,145
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0065% to 0.0060%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0070% to 0.0065%.
|
(C) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0075% to 0.0070%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
FSRNX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
13%
|
10%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
19,030
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
29,458
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
91,444
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
174,040,453
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
3
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
753
|
$
|
614
|
$
|
671
|
$
|
667
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
750
|
$
|
688
|
$
|
648
|
$
|
810
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(D)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
$
|
664
|
$
|
262
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, and Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective September 1, 2022.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective March 1, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
|
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
|
CO
|
7.94%
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
SEI INVESTMENTS DISTRIBUTION CO
|
OAKS
|
PA
|
7.89%
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC
|
JACKSONVILLE
|
FL
|
5.03%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
4,185
|
$
|
1,720,147
|
2022
|
$
|
209
|
$
|
2,096,588
|
|
2021
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
1,672,695
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Real Estate Index Fund
|
2023(A)
|
$
|
839,690
|
2022
|
$
|
1,048,467
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
843,232
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0350% to 0.0340%.
|
(B) On October 1, 2020, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0370% to 0.0350%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,247
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$947,728
|
$116,959
|
$4,028
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
Post-Effective Amendment No. 567
PART C. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 28.
Exhibits
(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(b)
(c)
Not applicable.
(d)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
Schedule A to the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2020, between Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited, on behalf of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund is to be filed by subsequent amendment.
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
Schedule A to the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2020, between Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited, on behalf of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund is to be filed by subsequent amendment.
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
Schedule A to the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2020, between Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited, on behalf of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund is to be filed by subsequent amendment.
(143)
(144)
(145)
(146)
(147)
(148)
(e)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(f)
(g)
(1)
Custodian Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, between The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon) and Fidelity Salem Street Trust on behalf of Fidelity Flex U.S. Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund, Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Municipal Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity Municipal Income 2025 Fund, Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI International Credit Fund, Fidelity SAI International Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Investment Grade Securitized Fund, Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Bond Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Municipal Money Market Fund, Fidelity SAI Short-Term Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI Sustainable Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity SAI Tax-Free Bond Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Series Government Money Market Fund, Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund, Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund, Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund, Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond Fund, Fidelity Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund, Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund, and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(1) of Fidelity Advisor Series IVs (File No. 002-83672) Post-Effective Amendment No. 88.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(h)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(i)
Legal Opinion of Dechert LLP, dated September 21, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (i).
(j)
(1)
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated September 21,2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (j)(1).
(2)
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated September 21, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (j)(2).
(k)
Not applicable.
(l)
Not applicable.
(m)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(n)
(1)
(2)
(p)
(1)
(2)
Item 29.
Trusts Controlled by or under Common Control with this Trust
The Board of Trustees of the Trust is the same as the board of other Fidelity funds, each of which has Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, or an affiliate, or Geode Capital Management LLC, as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Trust are substantially identical to those of the other Fidelity funds. Nonetheless, the Trust takes the position that it is not under common control with other Fidelity funds because the power residing in the respective boards and officers arises as the result of an official position with the respective trusts.
Item 30.
Indemnification
Article XI, Section 2 of the Declaration of Trust sets forth the reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification shall be provided to any past or present Trustee or officer. It states that the Trust shall indemnify any present or past trustee or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability, and all expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of his or her service as a trustee or officer and against any amount incurred in settlement thereof. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudged by a court or other adjudicatory body to be liable to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of his or her duties (collectively, disabling conduct), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination, as specified in the Declaration of Trust, that the officer or trustee did not engage in disabling conduct.
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Distributor and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Trust (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Trust does not agree to indemnify the Distributor or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Trust by or on behalf of the Distributor. In no case is the indemnity of the Trust in favor of the Distributor or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Distributor or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which the Distributor or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
Pursuant to the agreement by which Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC (FIIOC) is appointed transfer agent, the Registrant agrees to indemnify and hold FIIOC harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) resulting from:
(1)
any claim, demand, action, or suit brought by any person other than the Registrant, including by a shareholder, which names FIIOC and/or the Registrant as a party and is not based on and does not result from FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties, and arises out of or in connection with FIIOCs performance under the Transfer Agency Agreement; or
(2)
any claim, demand, action or suit (except to the extent contributed to by FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties) which results from the negligence of the Registrant, or from FIIOCs acting upon any instruction(s) reasonably believed by it to have been executed or communicated by any person duly authorized by the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon advice reasonably believed by FIIOC to have been given by counsel for the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon any instrument or stock certificate reasonably believed by it to have been genuine and signed, countersigned or executed by the proper person.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Registrant, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Item 31.
Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser(s)
(1) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC (FMR)
FMR serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies. The directors and officers of the Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Abigail P. Johnson | Chairman of the Board of certain Trusts; Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR LLC; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. Previously served as Chairman of the Board and Director FMRC. |
Peter S. Lynch | Vice Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and a member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR. Previously served as Vice Chairman and Director of FMRC. |
Cynthia Lo Bessette | Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; Secretary Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022); Previously served as Senior Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer FMRC; Secretary SelectCo, LLC and FIMM; Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Lisa D. Krieser | Assistant Secretary Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and Fidelity Distributors Company LLC, Secretary FMR Capital, Inc and Strategic Advisers LLC (2022). |
Bart Grenier | President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. |
Margaret Serravalli | Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR). |
Michael Shulman | Assistant Treasurer Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) (2022), Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022), FIMM (2022), Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FMR LLC (2023), FMR Capital, Inc. (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Executive Vice President, Tax of FMR LLC (2023). |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jason Pogorelec | Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023). |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(2) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (HONG KONG) LIMITED (FMR H.K.)
FMR H.K. provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Sharon Yau Lecornu | Chief Executive Officer of FMR H.K., Executive Director of FMR H.K., Director of Investment Services Asia, and Director of FMR H.K. | ||
William Francis Shanley III | Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. | ||
James Lenton | Director of FMR H.K. (2023). | ||
Adrian James Tyerman | Compliance Officer FMR H.K. and FMR UK, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. | ||
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. | ||
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. | ||
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(3) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (JAPAN) LIMITED (FMR JAPAN)
FMR Japan provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Timothy M. Cohen | Director of FMR Japan; Executive Vice President SelectCo, LLC. |
Nathaniel Norr Salter | Director of FMR Japan (2023). |
Rieko Hirai | Director of FMR Japan. |
Kan Man Wong | Director of FMR Japan. |
Kirk Roland Neureiter | Director of FMR Japan. |
William Francis Shanley III | Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. |
Koichi Iwabuchi | Statutory Auditor of FMR Japan; Previously served as Compliance Officer of FMR Japan. |
Ryo Sato | Compliance Officer of FMR Japan. |
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(4) FMR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (UK) LIMITED (FMR UK)
FMR UK provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Mark D. Flaherty | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Niamh Brodie-Machura | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher J. Seabolt | Director of FMR UK; Previously served as Director of FMR HK (2023). |
Adrian James Tyerman | Compliance Officer FMR H.K. Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jean-Philippe Provost | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023). |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
|
|
(5) GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC (Geode)
Geode serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies AND OTHER ACCOUNTS. Geode may also provide investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
David Lane | President and Chief Executive Officer (2023). |
Jeffrey S. Miller | Chief Operating Officer. |
Michael Ciccone | Chief Compliance Officer (2023). |
Sorin Codreanu | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
Matt Nevins | General Counsel. |
Lionel Harris | Director (2021). |
Franklin Corning Kenly | Director. |
Arlene Rockefeller | Director. |
Eric Roiter | Director. |
Jennifer Uhrig | Director. |
Philip L. Bullen | Director. |
Thomas Sprague | Director. |
Michael Even | Director. |
Alok Kapoor | Director (2022). |
Principal business addresses of the investment adviser, sub-advisers and affiliates.
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.)
Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central
Hong Kong
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (FMR Japan)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (FMR UK)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FIL Investment Advisors (FIA)
Pembroke Hall
42 Crow Lane
Pembroke HM19, Bermuda
FIL Investment Advisors (UK) Limited (FIA(UK))
Beech Gate Millfield Lane
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey
KT20 6RP, United Kingdom
FIL Investments (Japan) Limited (FIJ)
Tri Seven Roppongi
7-7-7 Roppongi, Minato-ku,
Tokyo, Japan 106-0032
Strategic Advisers LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC)
900 Salem Street
Smithfield, RI 02917
Geode Capital Management, LLC (Geode)
100 Summer Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Fidelity Management Trust Company
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Investors Management LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Item 32.
Principal Underwriters
(a)
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) acts as distributor for all funds advised by FMR or an affiliate, as well as Fidelity Commodity Strategy Central Fund and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund.
(b) |
|
|
Name and Principal | Positions and Offices | Positions and Offices |
Business Address* | with Underwriter | with Fund |
Robert Adams | Chief Operating Officer (2021) | None |
Robert F. Bachman | Executive Vice President and Director (2023) | None |
Dalton Gustafson | President (2021) and Director (2023) | None |
Natalie Kavanaugh | Chief Legal Officer | None |
Michael Lyons | Chief Financial Officer | None |
John McGinty | Chief Compliance Officer (2021) | None |
Timothy Mulcahy | Director | None |
Michael Kearney | Treasurer | None |
Natalie Kavanaugh | Secretary | None |
Lisa D. Krieser | Assistant Secretary | None |
Michael Shulman | Assistant Treasurer (2022) | None |
* 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI
(c)
Not applicable.
Item 33.
Location of Accounts and Records
All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder are maintained by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC or Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC, 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210, or the funds respective custodians, or special purpose custodian, as applicable, The Bank of New York Mellon, 1 Wall Street, New York, NY; Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., 50 Post Office Square, Boston, MA; Citibank, N.A., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY, 10013; State Street Bank & Trust Company, 1 Lincoln Street, Boston, MA; and The Northern Trust Company, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60675.
Item 34.
Management Services
Not applicable.
Item 35.
Undertakings
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 567 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 26th day of September 2023.
| Fidelity Salem Street Trust | ||
| By | /s/Laura M. Del Prato |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Signature) |
| (Title) | (Date) |
|
|
|
|
/s/Laura M. Del Prato |
| President and Treasurer | September 26, 2023 |
Laura M. Del Prato |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John J. Burke III |
| Chief Financial Officer | September 26, 2023 |
John J. Burke III |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Abigail P. Johnson | | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Abigail P. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Elizabeth S. Acton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Ann E. Dunwoody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jonathan Chiel | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Jonathan Chiel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John Engler | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
John Engler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Arthur E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Michael E. Kenneally | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Mark A. Murray | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Mark A. Murray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe | * | Trustee | September 26, 2023 |
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| By: | /s/ Stephanie J. Brown |
|
| Stephanie J. Brown, pursuant to a power of attorney dated January 26, 2023 and filed herewith. |
* | By: | /s/Megan C. Johnson |
|
| Megan C. Johnson, pursuant to powers of attorney dated October 5, 2016 and January 11, 2023 and filed herewith. |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust | Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Advisor Series II | Fidelity Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV | Fidelity Newbury Street Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust | Fidelity New York Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II | Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC | Fidelity Oxford Street Trust |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust | Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust | Fidelity Phillips Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust | Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II | Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust | Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust | Fidelity Union Street Trust |
Fidelity Income Fund | Fidelity Union Street Trust II |
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust | Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
|
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Trustee (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby constitute and appoint Stephanie J. Brown, my true and lawful attorney- in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post- Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorney-in-fact deems necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact or her substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect only for such time as Stephanie J. Brown shall continue to be an officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, this Power of Attorney may be revoked at any time by the undersigned in writing.
This Power of Attorney has been executed as of January 26, 2023.
/s/ Abigail P. Johnson
Abigail P. Johnson
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment company:
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Director or Trustee (collectively, the Funds), hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, Marc R. Bryant, John V. OHanlon, Robert W. Helm, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after October 5, 2016.
WITNESS my hand on this 5th day of October, 2016.
/s/Jonathan Chiel |
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust Fidelity Advisor Series II Fidelity Advisor Series IV Fidelity Boylston Street Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust II Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC Fidelity Charles Street Trust Fidelity Colchester Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust II Fidelity Garrison Street Trust Fidelity Hereford Street Trust Fidelity Income Fund Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust | Fidelity Money Market Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust II Fidelity Newbury Street Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II Fidelity Oxford Street Trust Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II Fidelity Phillips Street Trust Fidelity Revere Street Trust Fidelity Salem Street Trust Fidelity School Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust II Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the Funds), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment company for which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, John V. OHanlon, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after January 11, 2023.
WITNESS our hands on this eleventh day of January 2023.
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton | /s/Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody | /s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
|
|
/s/John Engler | /s/Mark A. Murray |
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson |
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
between
FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST:
FIDELITY SAI CONSERVATIVE INCOME MUNICIPAL BOND FUND
and
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC
AGREEMENT made this 20th day of July, 2023, by and between Fidelity Salem Street Trust, a Massachusetts business trust which may issue one or more series of shares of beneficial interest (hereinafter called the Trust), on behalf of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (hereinafter called the Fund), and Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter called the Adviser) as set forth in its entirety below.
1.
(a)
Investment Advisory Services. The Adviser undertakes to act as investment adviser of the Fund and shall, subject to the supervision of the Trusts Board of Trustees, direct the investments of the Fund in accordance with the investment objective, policies and limitations as provided in the Funds Prospectus or other governing instruments, as amended from time to time, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rules thereunder, as amended from time to time (the 1940 Act), and such other limitations as the Fund may impose by notice in writing to the Adviser. The Adviser shall also furnish for the use of the Fund office space and all necessary office facilities, equipment and personnel for servicing the investments of the Fund; and shall pay the salaries and fees of all officers of the Trust, of all Trustees of the Trust who are interested persons of the Trust or of the Adviser and of all personnel of the Trust or the Adviser performing services relating to research, statistical and investment activities. The Adviser is authorized, in its discretion and without prior consultation with the Fund, to buy, sell, lend and otherwise trade in any stocks, bonds and other securities and investment instruments on behalf of the Fund. The investment policies and all other actions of the Fund are and shall at all times be subject to the control and direction of the Trusts Board of Trustees.
(b)
Management Services. The Adviser shall perform (or arrange for the performance by its affiliates of) the management and administrative services necessary for the operation of the Trust. The Adviser shall, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, perform various services for the Fund, including but not limited to: (i) providing the Fund with office space, equipment and facilities (which may be its own) for maintaining its organization; (ii) on behalf of the Fund, supervising relations with, and monitoring the performance of, any custodians, depositories, transfer and pricing agents, accountants, attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, insurers and other persons in any capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable; (iii) preparing all general shareholder communications, including shareholder reports; (iv) conducting shareholder relations; (v) maintaining the Trusts existence and its records; (vi) during such times as shares are publicly offered, maintaining the registration and qualification of the Funds shares under federal and state law; and (vii) investigating the development of and developing and implementing, if appropriate, management and shareholder services designed to enhance the value or convenience of the Fund as an investment vehicle.
The Adviser shall also furnish such reports, evaluations, information or analyses to the Trust as the Trusts Board of Trustees may request from time to time or as the Adviser may deem to be desirable. The Adviser shall make recommendations to the Trusts Board of Trustees with respect to the Trusts policies, and shall carry out such policies as are adopted by the Trustees. The Adviser shall, subject to review by the Board of Trustees, furnish such other services as the Adviser shall from time to time determine to be necessary or useful to perform its obligations under this Contract.
(c)
The Adviser shall place all orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio securities for the Funds account with brokers or dealers selected by the Adviser, which may include brokers or dealers affiliated with the Adviser. The Adviser shall use its best efforts to seek to execute portfolio transactions at prices which are advantageous to the Fund and at commission rates which are reasonable in relation to the benefits received. In selecting brokers or dealers qualified to execute a particular transaction, brokers or dealers may be selected who also provide brokerage and research services (as those terms are defined in Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to the Fund and/or the other accounts over which the Adviser or its affiliates exercise investment discretion. The Adviser is authorized to pay a broker or dealer who provides such brokerage and research services a commission for executing a portfolio transaction for the Fund which is in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction if the Adviser determines in good faith that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker or dealer. This determination may be viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the overall responsibilities which the Adviser and its affiliates have with respect to accounts over which they exercise investment discretion. The Trustees of the Trust shall periodically review the commissions paid by the Fund to determine if the commissions paid over representative periods of time were reasonable in relation to the benefits to the Fund.
The Adviser shall, in acting hereunder, be an independent contractor. The Adviser shall not be an agent of the Fund.
2.
It is understood that the Trustees, officers and shareholders of the Trust are or may be or become interested in the Adviser as directors, officers or otherwise and that directors, officers and stockholders of the Adviser are or may be or become similarly interested in the Trust, and that the Adviser may be or become interested in the Trust as a shareholder or otherwise.
3.
For the services and facilities to be furnished hereunder, the Adviser shall receive a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.20% of the average daily net assets of the Fund (computed in the manner set forth in the Declaration of Trust) throughout the month; provided that in the case of initiation or termination of this Contract during any month, the fee for that month shall be reduced proportionately on the basis of the number of business days during which it is in effect, and the fee computed upon the average net assets for the business days it is so in effect for that month.
4.
It is understood that the Fund will pay all its expenses other than those expressly stated to be payable by the Adviser hereunder, which expenses payable by the Fund shall include, without limitation, (i) interest and taxes; (ii) brokerage commissions and other costs in connection with the purchase or sale of securities and other investment instruments; (iii) fees and expenses of the Trusts Trustees other than those who are interested persons of the Trust or the Adviser; (iv) legal and audit expenses; (v) custodian, registrar and transfer agent fees and expenses; (vi) fees and expenses related to the registration and qualification of the Trust and the Funds shares for distribution under state and federal securities laws; (vii) expenses of printing and mailing reports and notices and proxy materials to shareholders of the Fund; (viii) all other expenses incidental to holding meetings of the Funds shareholders, including proxy solicitations therefor; (ix) its proportionate share of insurance premiums; (x) its proportionate share of association membership dues; (xi) expenses of typesetting for printing Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information and supplements thereto; (xii) expenses of printing and mailing Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information and supplements thereto sent to existing shareholders; and (xiii) such non-recurring or extraordinary expenses as may arise, including those relating to actions, suits or proceedings to which the Fund is a party and the legal obligation which the Fund may have to indemnify the Trusts Trustees and officers with respect thereto.
5.
The services of the Adviser to the Fund are not to be deemed exclusive, the Adviser being free to render services to others and engage in other activities, provided, however, that such other services and activities do not, during the term of this Contract, interfere, in a material manner, with the Advisers ability to meet all of its obligations with respect to rendering services to the Fund hereunder. In the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of obligations or duties hereunder on the part of the Adviser, the Adviser shall not be subject to liability to the Fund or to any shareholder of the Fund for any act or omission in the course of, or connected with, rendering services hereunder or for any losses that may be sustained in the purchase, holding or sale of any security or other investment instrument.
6.
(a)
Subject to prior termination as provided in sub-paragraph (d) of this paragraph 6, this Contract shall continue in force until September 30, 2024 and indefinitely thereafter, but only so long as the continuance after such date shall be specifically approved at least annually by vote of the Trustees of the Trust or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund.
(b)
This Contract may be modified by mutual consent subject to the provisions of Section 15 of the 1940 Act, as modified by or interpreted by any applicable order or orders of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) or any rules or regulations adopted by, or interpretative releases or no-action letters of, the Commission or its staff.
(c)
In addition to the requirements of sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph 6, the terms of any continuance or modification of this Contract must have been approved by the vote of a majority of those Trustees of the Trust who are not parties to the Contract or interested persons of any such party, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval (to the extent required by the 1940 Act).
(d)
Either party hereto may, at any time on sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other, terminate this Contract, without payment of any penalty, by action of its Trustees or Board of Directors, as the case may be, or with respect to the Fund by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund. This Contract shall terminate automatically in the event of its assignment.
7.
The Adviser is hereby expressly put on notice of the limitation of shareholder liability as set forth in the Trusts Declaration of Trust or other organizational documents and agrees that the obligations assumed by the Trust pursuant to this Contract shall be limited in all cases to the Fund and its assets, and the Adviser shall not seek satisfaction of any such obligation from the shareholders or any shareholder of the Fund or any other Funds of the Trust. In addition, the Adviser shall not seek satisfaction of any such obligations from the Trustees or any individual Trustee. The Adviser understands that the rights and obligations of any Fund under the Declaration of Trust or other organizational documents are separate and distinct from those of any and all other Funds.
8.
This Contract shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without giving effect to the choice of laws provisions thereof.
The terms vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, assignment, and interested persons, when used herein, shall have the respective meanings specified in the 1940 Act, as now in effect or as hereafter amended, and subject to such orders or no-action letters as may be granted by the Commission or its staff.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this instrument to be signed in their behalf by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed, all as of the date written above.
| FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST | |
| on behalf of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund | |
| | |
| By | \s\ Laura M. Del Prato |
| | Laura M. Del Prato |
| | President and Treasurer |
| | |
| FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH | |
| | COMPANY LLC |
| | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | By | \s\ Christopher J. Rimmer |
| | Christopher J. Rimmer |
| | Treasurer |
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
between
FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST
and
FIDELITY DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY LLC
AGREEMENT made this 20th day of July, 2023, between Fidelity Salem Street Trust, a Massachusetts business trust having its principal place of business in Boston, Massachusetts and which may issue one or more series of beneficial interest (Issuer), with respect to shares of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund, a series of the Issuer, and Fidelity Distributors Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company having its principal place of business in Smithfield, Rhode Island (Distributors).
In consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
1.
Sale of Shares - The Issuer grants to Distributors the right to sell shares on behalf of the Issuer during the term of this Agreement and subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (1933 Act), and of the laws governing the sale of securities in the various states (Blue Sky Laws) under the following terms and conditions: Distributors (i) shall have the right to sell, as agent on behalf of the Issuer, shares authorized for issue and registered under the 1933 Act, and (ii) may sell shares under offers of exchange, if available, between and among the funds advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (the Adviser) or any of its affiliates.
2.
Sale of Shares by the Issuer - The rights granted to Distributors shall be non-exclusive in that the Issuer reserves the right to sell its shares to investors on applications received and accepted by the Issuer. Further, the Issuer reserves the right to issue shares in connection with the merger or consolidation, or acquisition by the Issuer through purchase or otherwise, with any other investment company, trust, or personal holding company.
3.
Shares Covered by this Agreement - This Agreement shall apply to unissued shares of the Issuer, shares of the Issuer held in its treasury in the event that in the discretion of the Issuer treasury shares shall be sold, and shares of the Issuer repurchased for resale.
4.
Public Offering Price - Except as otherwise noted in the Issuers current Prospectus and/or Statement of Additional Information, all shares sold to investors by Distributors or the Issuer will be sold at the public offering price. The public offering price for all accepted subscriptions will be the net asset value per share, as determined in the manner described in the Issuers current Prospectus and/or Statement of Additional Information, plus a sales charge (if any) described in the Issuers current Prospectus and/or Statement of Additional Information. The Issuer shall in all cases receive the net asset value per share on all sales. If a sales charge is in effect, Distributors shall have the right subject to such rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission as may then be in effect pursuant to Section 22 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 to pay a portion of the sales charge to dealers who have sold shares of the Issuer. If a fee in connection with shareholder redemptions is in effect, the Issuer shall collect the fee and, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Issuer and Distributors, the Issuer shall be entitled to receive all of such fees.
5.
Suspension of Sales - If and whenever the determination of net asset value is suspended and until such suspension is terminated, no further orders for shares shall be processed by Distributors except such unconditional orders as may have been placed with Distributors before it had knowledge of the suspension. In addition, the Issuer reserves the right to suspend sales and Distributors authority to process orders for shares on behalf of the Issuer if, in the judgment of the Issuer, it is in the best interests of the Issuer to do so. Suspension will continue for such period as may be determined by the Issuer.
6.
Solicitation of Sales - In consideration of these rights granted to Distributors, Distributors agrees to use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of the Issuer. This shall not prevent Distributors from entering into like arrangements (including arrangements involving the payment of underwriting commissions) with other Issuers. This does not obligate Distributors to register as a broker or dealer under the Blue Sky Laws of any jurisdiction in which it is not now registered or to maintain its registration in any jurisdiction in which it is now registered. If a sales charge is in effect, Distributors shall have the right to enter into sales agreements with dealers of its choice for the sale of shares of the Issuer to the public at the public offering price only and fix in such agreements the portion of the sales charge which may be retained by dealers, provided that the Issuer shall approve the form of the dealer agreement and the dealer discounts set forth therein and shall evidence such approval by filing said form of dealer agreement and amendments thereto as an exhibit to its currently effective Registration Statement under the 1933 Act. The Distributor will not direct remuneration from commissions paid by the Issuer for portfolio securities transactions to a broker or dealer for promoting or selling fund shares.
7.
Authorized Representations - Distributors is not authorized by the Issuer to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in the appropriate registration statements or Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the 1933 Act (as these registration statements, Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information may be amended from time to time), or contained in shareholder reports or other material that may be prepared by or on behalf of the Issuer for Distributors use. This shall not be construed to prevent Distributors from preparing and distributing sales literature or other material as it may deem appropriate.
8.
Portfolio Securities - Portfolio securities of the Issuer may be bought or sold by or through Distributors, and Distributors may participate directly or indirectly in brokerage commissions or spreads for transactions in portfolio securities of the Issuer.
9.
Registration of Shares - The Issuer agrees that it will take all action necessary to register shares under the 1933 Act (subject to the necessary approval of its shareholders) so that there will be available for sale the number of shares Distributors may reasonably be expected to sell. The Issuer shall make available to Distributors such number of copies of its currently effective Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information as Distributors may reasonably request. The Issuer shall furnish to Distributors copies of all information, financial statements and other papers which Distributors may reasonably request for use in connection with the distribution of shares of the Issuer.
10.
Expenses - The Issuer shall pay all fees and expenses (a) in connection with the preparation, setting in type and filing of any registration statement, Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information under the 1933 Act and amendments for the issue of its shares, (b) in connection with the registration and qualification of shares for sale in the various states in which the Board of Trustees of the Issuer shall determine it advisable to qualify such shares for sale (including registering the Issuer as a broker or dealer or any officer of the Issuer as agent or salesman in any state), (c) of preparing, setting in type, printing and mailing any report or other communication to shareholders of the Issuer in their capacity as such, and (d) of preparing, setting in type, printing and mailing Prospectuses, Statements of Additional Information and any supplements thereto sent to existing shareholders.
As provided in the Distribution and Service Plan adopted by the Issuer, it is recognized by the Issuer that the Adviser or its affiliates may make payment to Distributors with respect to any expenses incurred in the distribution of shares of the Issuer, such payments payable from the past profits or other resources of the Adviser or its affiliates including management fees paid to it by the Issuer.
11.
Indemnification - The Issuer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Distributors and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls Distributors within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Issuer (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Issuer does not agree to indemnify Distributors or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Issuer by or on behalf of Distributors. In no case (i) is the indemnity of the Issuer in favor of Distributors or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect Distributors or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which Distributors or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement, or (ii) is the Issuer to be liable under its indemnity agreement contained in this paragraph with respect to any claim made against Distributors or any person indemnified unless Distributors or person, as the case may be, shall have notified the Issuer in writing of the claim within a reasonable time after the summons or other first written notification giving information of the nature of the claim shall have been served upon Distributors or any such person (or after Distributors or such person shall have received notice of service on any designated agent). However, failure to notify the Issuer of any claim shall not relieve the Issuer from any liability which it may have to Distributors or any person against whom such action is brought otherwise than on account of its indemnity agreement contained in this paragraph. The Issuer shall be entitled to participate at its own expense in the defense, or, if it so elects, to assume the defense of any suit brought to enforce any claims, but if the Issuer elects to assume the defense, the defense shall be conducted by counsel chosen by it and satisfactory to Distributors or person or persons, defendant or defendants in the suit. In the event the Issuer elects to assume the defense of any suit and retain counsel, Distributors, officers or directors or controlling person or persons, defendant or defendants in the suit, shall bear the fees and expenses of any additional counsel retained by them. If the Issuer does not elect to assume the defense of any suit, it will reimburse Distributors, officers or directors or controlling person or persons, defendant or defendants in the suit, for the reasonable fees and expenses of any counsel retained by them. The Issuer agrees to notify Distributors promptly of the commencement of any litigation or proceedings against it or any of its officers or trustees in connection with the issuance or sale of any of the shares.
Distributors also covenants and agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless the Issuer and each of its Board members and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Issuer within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act, against any loss, liability, damages, claim or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, damages, claim or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the 1933 Act or any other statute or common law, alleging any wrongful act of Distributors or any of its employees or alleging that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Issuer (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading, insofar as the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with information furnished to the Issuer by or on behalf of Distributors. In no case (i) is the indemnity of Distributors in favor of the Issuer or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Issuer or any person against any liability to which the Issuer or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement, or (ii) is Distributors to be liable under its indemnity agreement contained in this paragraph with respect to any claim made against the Issuer or any person indemnified unless the Issuer or person, as the case may be, shall have notified Distributors in writing of the claim within a reasonable time after the summons or other first written notification giving information of the nature of the claim shall have been served upon the Issuer or any such person (or after the Issuer or such person shall have received notice of service on any designated agent). However, failure to notify Distributors of any claim shall not relieve Distributors from any liability which it may have to the Issuer or any person against whom the action is brought otherwise than on account of its indemnity agreement contained in this paragraph. In the case of any notice to Distributors, it shall be entitled to participate, at its own expense, in the defense or, if it so elects, to assume the defense of any suit brought to enforce the claim, but if Distributors elects to assume the defense, the defense shall be conducted by counsel chosen by it and satisfactory to the Issuer, to its officers and Board and to any controlling person or persons, defendant or defendants in the suit. In the event that Distributors elects to assume the defense of any suit and retain counsel, the Issuer or controlling persons, defendant or defendants in the suit, shall bear the fees and expense of any additional counsel retained by them. If Distributors does not elect to assume the defense of any suit, it will reimburse the Issuer, officers and Board or controlling person or persons, defendant or defendants in the suit, for the reasonable fees and expenses of any counsel retained by them. Distributors agrees to notify the Issuer promptly of the commencement of any litigation or proceedings against it in connection with the issue and sale of any of the shares.
12.
Effective Date - This agreement shall be effective upon its execution, and unless terminated as provided, shall continue in force until May 31, 2025 and thereafter from year to year, provided continuance is approved annually by the vote of a majority of the Board members of the Issuer, and by the vote of those Board members of the Issuer who are not interested persons of the Issuer and, if a plan under Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is in effect, by the vote of those Board members of the Issuer who are not interested persons of the Issuer and who are not parties to the Distribution and Service Plan or this Agreement and have no financial interest in the operation of the Distribution and Service Plan or in any agreements related to the Distribution and Service Plan, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the approval (to the extent required by the 1940 Act). This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. As used in this paragraph, the terms assignment and interested persons shall have the respective meanings specified in the Investment Company Act of 1940 as now in effect or as hereafter amended. In addition to termination by failure to approve continuance or by assignment, this Agreement may at any time be terminated by either party upon not less than sixty days prior written notice to the other party.
13.
Notice - Any notice required or permitted to be given by either party to the other shall be deemed sufficient if sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed by the party giving notice to the other party at the last address furnished by the other party to the party giving notice: if to the Issuer, at 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts, and if to Distributors, at 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island.
14.
Limitation of Liability - Distributors is expressly put on notice of the limitation of shareholder liability as set forth in the Declaration of Trust or other organizational document of the Issuer and agrees that the obligations assumed by the Issuer under this contract shall be limited in all cases to the Issuer and its assets. Distributors shall not seek satisfaction of any such obligation from the shareholders or any shareholder of the Issuer. Nor shall Distributors seek satisfaction of any such obligation from the Trustees or any individual Trustee of the Issuer. Distributors understands that the rights and obligations of each series of shares of the Issuer under the Issuers Declaration of Trust or other organizational document are separate and distinct from those of any and all other series.
15.
This agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without giving effect to the choice of laws provisions thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer has executed this instrument in its name and behalf, and its seal affixed, by one of its officers duly authorized, and Distributors has executed this instrument in its name and behalf by one of its officers duly authorized, as of the day and year first above written.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST | |
| | |
| By | \s\Laura M. Del Prato Laura M. Del Prato |
| | |
| FIDELITY DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY LLC | |
| | |
| By | \s\Dalton L. Gustafson Dalton L. Gustafson |
Dechert LLP
One International Place, 40th Floor
100 Oliver Street
Boston, MA 02110-2605
+1 617 728 7100 Main
+1 617 426 6567 Fax
www.dechert.com
September 21, 2023
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Re: Post-Effective Amendment No. 567 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel to Fidelity Salem Street Trust, a Massachusetts business trust (the Trust) and its separate series Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund, and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (the Funds), in connection with Post-Effective Amendment No. 567 to the Trusts Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the Amendment) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
In connection with the opinion set forth herein, you have provided to us originals, copies or facsimile transmissions of, and we have reviewed and relied upon, among other things, copies of the following: the Amendment; the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust dated May 16, 2001, as amended; the By-Laws of the Trust dated June 17, 2004; and other such Trust records, certificates, resolutions, documents and statutes that we have deemed relevant in order to render the opinion expressed herein. In addition, we have reviewed and relied upon a Certificate issued by the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
In rendering this opinion we have assumed, without independent verification, (i) the due authority of all individuals signing in representative capacities and the genuineness of signatures; (ii) the authenticity, completeness and continued effectiveness of all documents or copies furnished to us; (iii) that any resolutions provided have been duly adopted by the Trusts Board of Trustees;
(iv) that the facts contained in the instruments and certificates or statements of public officials, officers and representatives of the Trust on which we have relied for the purposes of this opinion are true and correct; and (v) that no amendments, agreements, resolutions or actions have been approved, executed or adopted which would limit, supersede or modify the items described above. Where documents are referred to in resolutions approved by the Board of Trustees, or in the Amendment, we have assumed such documents are the same as in the most recent form provided to us, whether as an exhibit to the Amendment or otherwise. When any opinion set forth below relates to the existence or standing of the Trust, such opinion is based entirely upon and is limited by the items referred to above, and we understand that the foregoing assumptions, limitations and qualifications are acceptable to you.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that each Funds shares registered under the Securities Act, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of purchase described in the Amendment, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
The opinion expressed herein is given as of the date hereof and we undertake no obligation and hereby disclaim any obligation to advise you of any change after the date of this opinion pertaining to any matter referred to herein. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Amendment and to the use of our name in the Amendment unless and until we revoke such consent. In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Dechert LLP
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post–Effective Amendment to Registration Statement No. 002-41839 on Form N–1A of our reports dated September 12, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund and Fidelity SAI U.S. Momentum Index Fund, our reports dated September 13, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund, and Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund, and our report dated September 14, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund, each a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of Fidelity Salem Street Trust for the year ended July 31, 2023, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of such Registration Statement.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 21, 2023
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information in Post–Effective Amendment No. 567 to the Registration Statement on Form N–1A of Fidelity Salem Street Trust: Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund of our report dated September 12, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights, which appears in the above referenced fund’s Annual Report to Shareholders on Form N-CSR for the year ended July 31, 2023. We also consent to the references to our Firm under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectus and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 21, 2023
DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE PLAN
Fidelity Salem Street Trust: Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund
1.
This Distribution and Service Plan (the Plan), when effective in accordance with its terms, shall be the written Plan contemplated by Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Act) of Fidelity SAI Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (the Fund), a series of Fidelity Salem Street Trust (the Trust).
2.
The Trust has entered into a General Distribution Agreement on behalf of the Fund with Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (the Distributor), an affiliate of the Funds investment adviser (the Adviser), under which the Distributor uses all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for the Funds Shares of beneficial interest (Shares). Under the agreement, the Distributor pays the expenses of printing and distributing any prospectuses, reports, and other literature used by the Distributor, advertising, and other promotional activities in connection with the offering of Shares of the Fund for sale to the public. It is recognized that the Adviser may use its management fee revenues as well as past profits or its resources from any other source, to make payment to the Distributor with respect to any expenses incurred in connection with the distribution of Fund Shares, including the activities referred to above.
3.
The Adviser directly, or through the Distributor, may, subject to the approval of the Trustees, make payments to securities dealers and other third parties who engage in the sale of Shares or who render shareholder support services, including but not limited to providing office space, equipment and telephone facilities, answering routine inquiries regarding the Fund, processing shareholder transactions and providing such other shareholder services as the Trust may reasonably request.
4.
The Fund will not make separate payments as a result of this Plan to the Adviser, Distributor or any other party, it being recognized that the Fund presently pays, and will continue to pay, a management fee to the Adviser. To the extent that any payments made by the Fund to the Adviser, including payment of management fees, should be deemed to be indirect financing of any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Shares of the Fund within the context of Rule 12b-1 under the Act, then such payments shall be deemed to be authorized by this Plan.
5.
This Plan shall become effective upon the first business day of the month following the approval by a vote of a majority of the Trustees of the Trust, including a majority of Trustees who are not interested persons of the Trust (as defined in the Act) and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of this Plan or in any agreements related to this Plan (the Independent Trustees), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on this Plan (to the extent required by the 1940 Act).
6.
This Plan shall, unless terminated as hereinafter provided, remain in effect until November 30, 2023, and from year to year thereafter, provided, however, that such continuance is subject to approval annually by a vote of a majority of the Trustees of the Trust, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on this Plan (to the extent required by the 1940 Act). This Plan may be amended at any time by the Board of Trustees, provided that (a) any amendment to authorize direct payments by the Fund to finance any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Shares of the Fund, or to increase materially the amount spent by the Fund for distribution, shall be effective only upon approval by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, and (b) any material amendments of this Plan shall be effective only upon approval in the manner provided in the first sentence in this paragraph.
7.
This Plan may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund.
8.
During the existence of this Plan, the Trust shall require the Adviser and/or the Distributor to provide the Trust, for review by the Trustees, and the Trustees shall review, at least quarterly, a written report of the amounts expended in connection with financing any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Shares of the Fund (making estimates of such costs where necessary or desirable) and the purposes for which such expenditures were made.
9.
This Plan does not require the Adviser or Distributor to perform any specific type or level of distribution activities or to incur any specific level of expenses for activities primarily intended to result in the sale of Shares of the Fund
.
10.
Consistent with the limitation of shareholder liability as set forth in the Trusts Declaration of Trust or other organizational document, any obligations assumed by the Fund pursuant to this Plan and any agreements related to this Plan shall be limited in all cases to the Fund and its assets, and shall not constitute obligations of any other series of shares of the Trust.
11.
If any provision of this Plan shall be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the remainder of the Plan shall not be affected thereby.