Securities Act of 1933 Registration No. 002-41839
Investment Company Act of 1940 Registration No. 811-02105
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-1A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 [X]
[ ] Pre-Effective Amendment No. ______
[X] Post-Effective Amendment No. 573
and
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 [X]
[X] Amendment No. 573
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: 617-563-7000
Margaret Carey, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
It is proposed that this filing will become effective on December 30, 2023 pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time.
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund |
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund | |
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.11%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.26%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.01% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.25%
|
1 year
|
$
|
26
|
3 years
|
$
|
82
|
5 years
|
$
|
145
|
10 years
|
$
|
329
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||||
5.21%
|
10.77%
|
-12.98%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
15.03%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.34%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
7.57%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
||
Return Before Taxes
|
-12.98%
|
1.47%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-13.26%
|
1.03%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-7.30%
|
1.18%
|
Fidelity Emerging Markets Low Volatility Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-13.07%
|
2.42%
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.02%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.17%
|
1 year
|
$
|
17
|
3 years
|
$
|
55
|
5 years
|
$
|
96
|
10 years
|
$
|
217
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||
2.43%
|
21.40%
|
-4.86%
|
16.08%
|
-1.57%
|
9.90%
|
-13.48%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
11.05%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-17.34%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
4.58%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-13.48%
|
0.66%
|
2.45%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-13.77%
|
0.08%
|
1.88%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-7.57%
|
0.62%
|
1.96%
|
Fidelity International Low Volatility Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-13.36%
|
-%
|
-%
|
Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund Linked Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-13.36%
|
0.90%
|
2.74%
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.10%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.01%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.11%
|
1 year
|
$
|
11
|
3 years
|
$
|
35
|
5 years
|
$
|
62
|
10 years
|
$
|
141
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||
10.61%
|
18.92%
|
1.39%
|
27.70%
|
9.85%
|
21.52%
|
-10.90%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
14.66%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-17.54%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
4.53%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-10.90%
|
9.02%
|
10.10%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-11.74%
|
8.19%
|
9.30%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-5.86%
|
7.03%
|
8.05%
|
Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-10.80%
|
-%
|
-%
|
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund Linked Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-10.80%
|
9.12%
|
10.24%
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
0.10%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019 A
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
9.29
|
$
|
11.44
|
$
|
9.41
|
$
|
10.11
|
$
|
10.00
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) B,C
|
.35
|
.33
|
.27
|
.24
|
.22
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.70
|
(2.22)
|
1.95
|
(.75)
|
(.11)
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.05
|
(1.89)
|
2.22
|
(.51)
|
.11
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.18)
|
(.26)
|
(.19)
|
(.19)
|
-
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.18)
|
(.26)
|
(.19)
|
(.19)
|
-
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
10.16
|
$
|
9.29
|
$
|
11.44
|
$
|
9.41
|
$
|
10.11
|
Total Return D,E
|
11.41%
|
(16.88)%
|
23.79%
|
(5.10)%
|
1.10%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets C,F,G
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.26%
|
.26%
|
.23%
|
.24%
|
.35% H
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.26%
|
.25%
|
.23%
|
.24%
|
.26% H
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.26%
|
.25%
|
.23%
|
.24%
|
.26% H
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.37%
|
3.09%
|
2.44%
|
2.59%
|
2.90% H
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
3,171,949
|
$
|
2,071,953
|
$
|
1,792,423
|
$
|
1,259,405
|
$
|
644,085
|
Portfolio turnover rate I
|
22%
|
21%
|
28%
|
30%
|
75% H
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
9.13
|
$
|
11.67
|
$
|
9.64
|
$
|
11.54
|
$
|
10.49
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.27
|
.26
|
.27
|
.24
|
.28
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.92
|
(2.52)
|
1.90
|
(1.46)
|
1.04
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.19
|
(2.26)
|
2.17
|
(1.22)
|
1.32
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.20)
|
(.28)
|
(.14)
|
(.22)
|
(.24)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(.46)
|
(.03)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.20)
|
(.28)
|
(.14)
|
(.68)
|
(.27)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
10.12
|
$
|
9.13
|
$
|
11.67
|
$
|
9.64
|
$
|
11.54
|
Total Return C
|
13.07%
|
(19.80)%
|
22.69%
|
(11.31)%
|
12.89%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.25%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.63%
|
2.46%
|
2.37%
|
2.39%
|
2.59%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
6,045,694
|
$
|
5,494,820
|
$
|
5,938,738
|
$
|
4,603,961
|
$
|
2,548,056
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
37%
|
26%
|
26%
|
20%
|
93%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
17.01
|
$
|
19.26
|
$
|
14.87
|
$
|
15.12
|
$
|
13.18
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.35
|
.33
|
.31
|
.30
|
.29
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.71
|
(1.90)
|
4.30
|
.03
|
1.98
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.06
|
(1.57)
|
4.61
|
.33
|
2.27
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.35)
|
(.34)
|
(.22)
|
(.24)
|
(.20)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
(.34)
|
(.35)
|
-
|
(.34)
|
(.13)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.68) C
|
(.68) C
|
(.22)
|
(.58)
|
(.33)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
17.39
|
$
|
17.01
|
$
|
19.26
|
$
|
14.87
|
$
|
15.12
|
Total Return D
|
6.39%
|
(8.39)%
|
31.25%
|
2.16%
|
17.62%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.12%
|
.19%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.12%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.12%
|
.15%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.01%
|
1.85%
|
1.76%
|
2.06%
|
2.05%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
9,574,760
|
$
|
7,712,276
|
$
|
7,816,045
|
$
|
5,243,996
|
$
|
4,120,541
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
50%
|
41%
|
44%
|
49%
|
72%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9864824.110
|
SV1-SV2-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.00%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.02%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.02%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.01% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.01%
|
1 year
|
$
|
1
|
3 years
|
$
|
3
|
5 years
|
$
|
8
|
10 years
|
$
|
22
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
14.22%
|
-4.38%
|
-5.75%
|
4.64%
|
27.47%
|
-13.95%
|
21.39%
|
10.76%
|
7.77%
|
-15.75%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
16.75%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.39%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
5.10%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-15.75%
|
0.99%
|
3.73%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-16.32%
|
0.33%
|
3.06%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-8.96%
|
0.67%
|
2.82%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-15.86%
|
1.05%
|
3.96%
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
December
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
11.43
|
$
|
15.55
|
$
|
12.23
|
$
|
12.78
|
$
|
11.80
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.41
|
.42
|
.38
|
.29
|
.40
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.03
|
(4.15)
|
3.18
|
(.56)
|
.90
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.44
|
(3.73)
|
3.56
|
(.27)
|
1.30
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.34)
|
(.39)
|
(.24)
|
(.26)
|
(.32)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(.01)
|
-
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.34)
|
(.39)
|
(.24)
|
(.28) C
|
(.32)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
12.53
|
$
|
11.43
|
$
|
15.55
|
$
|
12.23
|
$
|
12.78
|
Total Return D
|
12.62%
|
(24.57)%
|
29.34%
|
(2.27)%
|
11.36%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.02%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.01%
|
.04%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.11%
|
3.11%
|
2.52%
|
2.42%
|
3.27%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
36,491,891
|
$
|
29,886,480
|
$
|
30,864,862
|
$
|
18,177,449
|
$
|
12,066,585
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
6%
|
4%
|
5% H
|
5%
|
3% H
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
|
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.
|
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.899276.116
|
SGX-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund |
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.20%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.20%
|
1 year
|
$
|
20
|
3 years
|
$
|
64
|
5 years
|
$
|
113
|
10 years
|
$
|
255
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-13.99%
|
22.18%
|
12.98%
|
7.65%
|
-18.88%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
17.75%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-22.12%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
4.10%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-18.88%
|
0.73%
|
2.84%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-19.12%
|
0.41%
|
2.48%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-10.66%
|
0.71%
|
2.32%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA ESG Leaders Index (net)
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-18.93%
|
1.06%
|
3.28%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA ESG Leaders Index (gross)
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-18.65%
|
1.38%
|
3.61%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.11%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.11%
|
1 year
|
$
|
11
|
3 years
|
$
|
35
|
5 years
|
$
|
62
|
10 years
|
$
|
141
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-3.28%
|
31.53%
|
18.67%
|
31.57%
|
-20.27%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
20.35%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-18.47%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
15.01%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-20.27%
|
9.63%
|
10.86%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-20.55%
|
9.29%
|
10.52%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-11.80%
|
7.60%
|
8.66%
|
MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-20.21%
|
9.77%
|
11.00%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
0.20%
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
0.11%
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
9.59
|
$
|
13.60
|
$
|
10.81
|
$
|
10.89
|
$
|
9.87
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.31
|
.29
|
.30
|
.24
|
.32 C
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.90
|
(4.04)
|
2.63
|
(.08)
|
.91
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.21
|
(3.75)
|
2.93
|
.16
|
1.23
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.24)
|
(.26)
|
(.14)
|
(.24)
|
(.21)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.24)
|
(.26)
|
(.14)
|
(.24)
|
(.21)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
10.56
|
$
|
9.59
|
$
|
13.60
|
$
|
10.81
|
$
|
10.89
|
Total Return D
|
12.68%
|
(28.11)%
|
27.27%
|
1.48%
|
12.81%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.77%
|
2.52%
|
2.28%
|
2.25%
|
3.14% C
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
363,697
|
$
|
334,086
|
$
|
404,608
|
$
|
149,868
|
$
|
71,875
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
22%
|
23%
|
19%
|
11%
|
17%
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
16.85
|
$
|
20.91
|
$
|
14.29
|
$
|
13.18
|
$
|
11.43
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.27
|
.25
|
.23
|
.23
|
.23
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.81
|
(4.10)
|
6.56
|
1.08
|
1.69
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
2.08
|
(3.85)
|
6.79
|
1.31
|
1.92
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.25)
|
(.17)
|
(.17)
|
(.18)
|
(.15)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.04)
|
-
|
(.02)
|
(.02)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.25)
|
(.21)
|
(.17)
|
(.20)
|
(.17)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
18.68
|
$
|
16.85
|
$
|
20.91
|
$
|
14.29
|
$
|
13.18
|
Total Return C
|
12.47%
|
(18.58)%
|
47.84%
|
9.99%
|
17.06%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
.11%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
1.48%
|
1.37%
|
1.28%
|
1.68%
|
1.84%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
2,423,514
|
$
|
2,179,401
|
$
|
1,868,457
|
$
|
488,752
|
$
|
206,094
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
21%
|
9%
|
12%
|
10%
|
12%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9881310.108
|
USY-I-ISY-I-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.00%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.01%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.01% A
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.01% B
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.00%
|
1 year
|
$
|
0
|
3 years
|
$
|
2
|
5 years
|
$
|
4
|
10 years
|
$
|
12
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-13.95%
|
21.42%
|
10.76%
|
7.78%
|
-15.71%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
16.81%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.47%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
5.08%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-15.71%
|
1.00%
|
4.23%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-16.09%
|
0.59%
|
3.78%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-8.80%
|
0.87%
|
3.38%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-15.86%
|
1.05%
|
4.37%
|
Plan Accounts:
|
All Other Accounts:
|
www.401k.com
|
www.fidelity.com
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001 Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Overnight Express:
Fidelity Investments
100 Crosby Parkway
Covington, KY 41015
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
10.36
|
$
|
14.06
|
$
|
11.04
|
$
|
11.59
|
$
|
10.60
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.37
|
.37
|
.35
|
.27
|
.37
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.94
|
(3.76)
|
2.87
|
(.52)
|
.81
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.31
|
(3.39)
|
3.22
|
(.25)
|
1.18
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.29)
|
(.31)
|
(.20)
|
(.30)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.29)
|
(.31)
|
(.20)
|
(.30)
|
(.19)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.38
|
$
|
10.36
|
$
|
14.06
|
$
|
11.04
|
$
|
11.59
|
Total Return C
|
12.72%
|
(24.60)%
|
29.31%
|
(2.24)%
|
11.40%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.01%
|
-% F
|
-% F
|
-% F
|
-% F
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any F
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions F
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
-%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.09%
|
3.10%
|
2.56%
|
2.46%
|
3.35%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
1,648,532
|
$
|
1,275,808
|
$
|
1,272,152
|
$
|
575,120
|
$
|
378,587
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
3%
|
4%
|
5%
|
4%
|
4%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9880774.109
|
ZEI-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.075%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.078%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.153%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.078% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.075%
|
1 year
|
$
|
8
|
3 years
|
$
|
39
|
5 years
|
$
|
76
|
10 years
|
$
|
185
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
37.60%
|
-14.48%
|
18.20%
|
17.44%
|
-3.00%
|
-20.20%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
18.79%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-24.08%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
1.56%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-20.20%
|
-1.68%
|
5.31%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-20.53%
|
-2.18%
|
4.76%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-11.49%
|
-1.18%
|
4.23%
|
MSCI Emerging Markets Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-20.07%
|
-1.37%
|
5.70%
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
0.075%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
11.07
|
$
|
16.49
|
$
|
14.45
|
$
|
13.71
|
$
|
12.62
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.37
|
.41
|
.36
|
.30
|
.42 C
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.81
|
(5.38)
|
1.93
|
.80
|
.99
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.18
|
(4.97)
|
2.29
|
1.10
|
1.41
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.31)
|
(.45)
|
(.25)
|
(.36)
|
(.32)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.31)
|
(.45)
|
(.25)
|
(.36)
|
(.32)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.94
|
$
|
11.07
|
$
|
16.49
|
$
|
14.45
|
$
|
13.71
|
Total Return D
|
10.58%
|
(30.89)%
|
15.87%
|
8.19%
|
11.44%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.15%
|
.15%
|
.13%
|
.14%
|
.16%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.93%
|
2.95%
|
2.10%
|
2.21%
|
3.12% C
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
3,508,666
|
$
|
2,956,092
|
$
|
3,806,157
|
$
|
3,564,409
|
$
|
3,840,772
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
32%
|
30%
|
16%
|
38%
|
22%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9867759.108
|
SV6-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund |
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund | |
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.07%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.22%
|
1 year
|
$
|
23
|
3 years
|
$
|
71
|
5 years
|
$
|
124
|
10 years
|
$
|
280
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||||||
6.03%
|
-16.99%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
10.95%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-12.46%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
7.93%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
||
Return Before Taxes
|
-16.99%
|
7.55%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-17.86%
|
6.42%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-9.36%
|
5.83%
|
Fidelity Emerging Markets Value Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-17.02%
|
8.23%
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.03%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.18%
|
1 year
|
$
|
18
|
3 years
|
$
|
58
|
5 years
|
$
|
101
|
10 years
|
$
|
230
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||||||
12.88%
|
-21.45%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
17.94%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-18.97%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
8.85%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
||
Return Before Taxes
|
-21.45%
|
6.33%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-21.64%
|
5.87%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-12.13%
|
5.05%
|
Fidelity International Momentum Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-21.42%
|
6.66%
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.05%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.20%
|
1 year
|
$
|
20
|
3 years
|
$
|
64
|
5 years
|
$
|
113
|
10 years
|
$
|
255
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||||||
14.00%
|
-17.13%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
16.34%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-15.17%
|
June 30, 2022
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
3.84%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
||
Return Before Taxes
|
-17.13%
|
8.35%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-17.52%
|
6.67%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-9.51%
|
6.28%
|
Fidelity International Quality Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-17.25%
|
8.56%
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020 A
|
||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
10.20
|
$
|
14.32
|
$
|
11.78
|
$
|
10.00
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||
Net investment income (loss) B,C
|
.53
|
.61
|
.51
|
.19
|
||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.07
|
(4.04)
|
2.22
|
1.59
|
||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.60
|
(3.43)
|
2.73
|
1.78
|
||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.53)
|
(.37)
|
(.17)
|
-
|
||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.32)
|
(.02)
|
-
|
||||
Total distributions
|
(.53)
|
(.69)
|
(.19)
|
-
|
||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.27
|
$
|
10.20
|
$
|
14.32
|
$
|
11.78
|
Total Return D,E
|
15.81%
|
(25.19)%
|
23.32%
|
17.80%
|
||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets C,F,G
|
||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.27% H,I
|
||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.25% I
|
||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.22%
|
.25% I
|
||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
4.63%
|
4.95%
|
3.53%
|
3.43% I
|
||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
2,758,445
|
$
|
2,432,905
|
$
|
1,970,050
|
$
|
838,148
|
Portfolio turnover rate J
|
35%
|
30%
|
33%
|
17% K
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020 A
|
||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
10.28
|
$
|
14.51
|
$
|
11.33
|
$
|
10.00
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||
Net investment income (loss) B,C
|
.32
|
.30
|
.28
|
.08
|
||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.37
|
(4.17)
|
3.05
|
1.25
|
||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.69
|
(3.87)
|
3.33
|
1.33
|
||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.27)
|
(.27) D
|
(.09)
|
-
|
||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.10) D
|
(.05)
|
-
|
||||
Total distributions
|
(.27)
|
(.36) E
|
(.15) E
|
-
|
||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.70
|
$
|
10.28
|
$
|
14.51
|
$
|
11.33
|
Total Return F,G
|
16.53%
|
(27.34)%
|
29.56%
|
13.30%
|
||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets C,H,I
|
||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.18%
|
.18%
|
.19%
|
.24% J,K
|
||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.18%
|
.18%
|
.19%
|
.20% K
|
||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.18%
|
.18%
|
.19%
|
.20% K
|
||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.71%
|
2.47%
|
2.03%
|
1.55% K
|
||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
597,634
|
$
|
570,561
|
$
|
1,035,573
|
$
|
372,738
|
Portfolio turnover rate L
|
63%
|
113%
|
73%
|
29% M
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020 A
|
||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
9.92
|
$
|
14.51
|
$
|
11.07
|
$
|
10.00
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||
Net investment income (loss) B,C
|
.28
|
.32
|
.24
|
.08
|
||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.02
|
(3.44)
|
3.32
|
.99
|
||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.30
|
(3.12)
|
3.56
|
1.07
|
||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.33)
|
(.24)
|
(.10)
|
-
|
||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(1.24)
|
(.02)
|
-
|
||||
Total distributions
|
(.33)
|
(1.47) D
|
(.12)
|
-
|
||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
10.89
|
$
|
9.92
|
$
|
14.51
|
$
|
11.07
|
Total Return E,F
|
13.13%
|
(23.94)%
|
32.28%
|
10.70%
|
||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets C,G,H
|
||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.20%
|
.19%
|
.19%
|
.23% I,J
|
||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.20%
|
.19%
|
.19%
|
.20% J
|
||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.20%
|
.19%
|
.19%
|
.20% J
|
||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.49%
|
2.70%
|
1.78%
|
1.55% J
|
||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
277,285
|
$
|
316,291
|
$
|
588,201
|
$
|
473,547
|
Portfolio turnover rate K
|
38%
|
47%
|
78%
|
30% L
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9898206.104
|
EMV-IQI-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.15%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.02%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.17%
|
1 year
|
$
|
17
|
3 years
|
$
|
55
|
5 years
|
$
|
96
|
10 years
|
$
|
217
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
||||||
-16.11%
|
17.26%
|
-3.93%
|
13.84%
|
-5.97%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
21.95%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-29.56%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
11.30%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-5.97%
|
0.23%
|
0.38%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-6.68%
|
-0.68%
|
-0.53%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-2.54%
|
0.19%
|
0.31%
|
Fidelity International Value Focus Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-5.97%
|
0.49%
|
0.76%
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
0.15%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
7.65
|
$
|
10.03
|
$
|
7.16
|
$
|
9.19
|
$
|
8.93
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.39
|
.42
|
.38
|
.24
|
.37
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.14
|
(1.99)
|
2.63
|
(1.95)
|
.07
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.53
|
(1.57)
|
3.01
|
(1.71)
|
.44
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.39)
|
(.46)
|
(.14)
|
(.32)
|
(.18)
|
|||||
Distributions from net realized gain
|
-
|
(.35)
|
-
|
-
|
- C
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.39)
|
(.81)
|
(.14)
|
(.32)
|
(.18)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
8.79
|
$
|
7.65
|
$
|
10.03
|
$
|
7.16
|
$
|
9.19
|
Total Return D
|
20.25%
|
(16.93)%
|
42.33%
|
(19.36)%
|
5.12%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.17%
|
.16%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.26%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.17%
|
.16%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.17%
|
.16%
|
.17%
|
.18%
|
.20%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
4.33%
|
4.82%
|
3.84%
|
3.04%
|
4.22%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
3,759,429
|
$
|
4,148,718
|
$
|
5,985,049
|
$
|
2,258,397
|
$
|
1,036,532
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
62%
|
79%
|
60%
|
57%
|
59%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9885496.107
|
IIV-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund |
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund | |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.075%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.075%
|
1 year
|
$
|
8
|
3 years
|
$
|
24
|
5 years
|
$
|
42
|
10 years
|
$
|
96
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
-4.69%
|
0.59%
|
-15.84%
|
11.26%
|
37.65%
|
-14.63%
|
18.26%
|
17.82%
|
-3.04%
|
-20.07%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
18.80%
|
December 31, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.86%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
1.70%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-20.07%
|
-1.61%
|
1.31%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-20.47%
|
-2.11%
|
0.82%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-11.50%
|
-1.18%
|
1.01%
|
MSCI Emerging Markets Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-20.07%
|
-1.37%
|
1.47%
|
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund Linked Index℠
(reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes)
|
-20.07%
|
-1.37%
|
1.76%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.055%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.000%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.055%
|
1 year
|
$
|
6
|
3 years
|
$
|
18
|
5 years
|
$
|
31
|
10 years
|
$
|
71
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
14.27%
|
-4.40%
|
-5.60%
|
4.59%
|
27.40%
|
-13.91%
|
21.34%
|
10.71%
|
7.76%
|
-15.74%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
16.78%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.45%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
5.10%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Past 10
years
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-15.74%
|
0.98%
|
3.74%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-16.08%
|
0.56%
|
3.29%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-8.77%
|
0.92%
|
3.04%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-15.86%
|
1.05%
|
3.96%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Fund
|
NAV Calculation Times
(Eastern Time)
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
4:00 p.m.
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
December
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
0.075%
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
0.055%
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
8.56
|
$
|
12.64
|
$
|
11.07
|
$
|
10.48
|
$
|
9.62
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.29
|
.32
|
.28
|
.22
|
.35 C
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.63
|
(4.14)
|
1.48
|
.65
|
.72
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
.92
|
(3.82)
|
1.76
|
.87
|
1.07
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.23)
|
(.26)
|
(.19)
|
(.28)
|
(.21)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.23)
|
(.26)
|
(.19)
|
(.28)
|
(.21)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
9.25
|
$
|
8.56
|
$
|
12.64
|
$
|
11.07
|
$
|
10.48
|
Total Return D
|
10.74%
|
(30.81)%
|
15.95%
|
8.54%
|
11.33%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,E,F
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.07% G
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
.07% G
|
.08%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.07%
|
.07%
|
.07% G
|
.07%
|
.08%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
2.93%
|
2.97%
|
2.17%
|
2.20%
|
3.40% C
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
6,311,387
|
$
|
5,234,644
|
$
|
6,441,516
|
$
|
3,400,765
|
$
|
2,938,021
|
Portfolio turnover rate H
|
7%
|
8%
|
5%
|
10%
|
3%
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
11.60
|
$
|
15.79
|
$
|
12.43
|
$
|
13.09
|
$
|
12.07
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.42
|
.42
|
.38
|
.29
|
.41
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.05
|
(4.21)
|
3.23
|
(.57)
|
.91
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.47
|
(3.79)
|
3.61
|
(.28)
|
1.32
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.33)
|
(.40)
|
(.25)
|
(.38)
|
(.30)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.33)
|
(.40)
|
(.25)
|
(.38)
|
(.30)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
12.74
|
$
|
11.60
|
$
|
15.79
|
$
|
12.43
|
$
|
13.09
|
Total Return C
|
12.74%
|
(24.56)%
|
29.25%
|
(2.25)%
|
11.28%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.05% F
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.05% F
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.05%
|
.06%
|
.05% F
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.13%
|
3.06%
|
2.46%
|
2.37%
|
3.32%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
8,328,694
|
$
|
7,473,783
|
$
|
9,132,488
|
$
|
5,621,566
|
$
|
5,343,395
|
Portfolio turnover rate G
|
8%
|
5% H
|
5% H
|
5%
|
5% H
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.929365.116
|
EMX-I-GUX-I-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.035%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.020%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.055%
|
Fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.020% A
|
Total annual operating expenses after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement
|
0.035%
|
1 year
|
$
|
4
|
3 years
|
$
|
15
|
5 years
|
$
|
28
|
10 years
|
$
|
68
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
25.04%
|
-13.55%
|
22.06%
|
8.16%
|
11.26%
|
-14.17%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
18.49%
|
December 31, 2022
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-23.05%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
6.81%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-14.17%
|
1.74%
|
4.94%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-14.70%
|
1.23%
|
4.45%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-7.78%
|
1.48%
|
3.99%
|
MSCI EAFE Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-14.27%
|
1.75%
|
5.19%
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
0.035%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
10.88
|
$
|
14.52
|
$
|
11.04
|
$
|
12.19
|
$
|
11.27
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.39
|
.42
|
.37
|
.28
|
.38
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
1.27
|
(3.68)
|
3.36
|
(1.04)
|
.85
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.66
|
(3.26)
|
3.73
|
(.76)
|
1.23
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.39)
|
(.38)
|
(.25)
|
(.39)
|
(.31)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.39)
|
(.38)
|
(.25)
|
(.39)
|
(.31)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
12.15
|
$
|
10.88
|
$
|
14.52
|
$
|
11.04
|
$
|
12.19
|
Total Return C
|
15.43%
|
(23.00)%
|
34.09%
|
(6.51)%
|
11.36%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.06%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.05%
|
.11%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.05%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.04%
|
.05%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.12%
|
3.28%
|
2.66%
|
2.51%
|
3.35%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
4,680,772
|
$
|
3,168,926
|
$
|
6,252,147
|
$
|
3,657,921
|
$
|
6,490,033
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
18%
|
20%
|
10%
|
16%
|
4%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9867764.108
|
SV7-PRO-1223
|
Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
![]() 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210
|
Contents
Fund Summary |
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund |
Fund Basics |
|
Shareholder Information |
Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares |
Fund Services |
|
Appendix |
|
(fees paid directly from your investment)
|
None
|
Management fee
|
0.06%
|
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees
|
None
|
Other expenses
|
0.00%
|
Total annual operating expenses
|
0.06%
|
1 year
|
$
|
6
|
3 years
|
$
|
19
|
5 years
|
$
|
34
|
10 years
|
$
|
77
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|||||
27.63%
|
-14.38%
|
21.48%
|
11.07%
|
8.47%
|
-16.28%
|
![]() |
During the periods shown in the chart:
|
Returns
|
Quarter ended
|
Highest Quarter Return
|
17.41%
|
June 30, 2020
|
Lowest Quarter Return
|
-24.15%
|
March 31, 2020
|
Year-to-Date Return
|
5.04%
|
September 30, 2023
|
For the periods ended December 31, 2022
|
Past 1
year
|
Past 5
years
|
Life of
fund A
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
|||
Return Before Taxes
|
-16.28%
|
0.96%
|
4.62%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions
|
-16.62%
|
0.51%
|
4.17%
|
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares
|
-9.14%
|
0.84%
|
3.69%
|
MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index
(reflects no deduction for fees or expenses)
|
-16.45%
|
1.01%
|
4.84%
|
Additional purchases:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003
|
Redemptions:
Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035
|
Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House
|
Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system
|
Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions
|
Fund Name
|
Dividends Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund Name
|
Capital Gains Paid
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
December
|
Fund
|
Management Fee Rate
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
0.06%
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
Years ended October 31,
|
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||
Selected Per-Share Data
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$
|
10.82
|
$
|
14.81
|
$
|
11.54
|
$
|
12.09
|
$
|
11.14
|
Income from Investment Operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) A,B
|
.38
|
.38
|
.35
|
.27
|
.37
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
.94
|
(4.00)
|
3.14
|
(.50)
|
.81
|
|||||
Total from investment operations
|
1.32
|
(3.62)
|
3.49
|
(.23)
|
1.18
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income
|
(.29)
|
(.37)
|
(.22)
|
(.32)
|
(.23)
|
|||||
Total distributions
|
(.29)
|
(.37)
|
(.22)
|
(.32)
|
(.23)
|
|||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$
|
11.85
|
$
|
10.82
|
$
|
14.81
|
$
|
11.54
|
$
|
12.09
|
Total Return C
|
12.29%
|
(25.01)%
|
30.47%
|
(1.97)%
|
10.88%
|
|||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets B,D,E
|
||||||||||
Expenses before reductions
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Expenses net of all reductions
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
.06%
|
|||||
Net investment income (loss)
|
3.02%
|
3.04%
|
2.47%
|
2.41%
|
3.25%
|
|||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
|
$
|
9,844,410
|
$
|
8,018,849
|
$
|
8,557,656
|
$
|
4,656,266
|
$
|
3,254,707
|
Portfolio turnover rate F
|
4% G
|
3% G
|
5%
|
4%
|
4%
|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT
To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.
For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license. For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN). You will be asked to provide information about the entity's control person and beneficial owners, and person(s) with authority over the account, including name, address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity. |
The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.
|
Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number(s), 811-02105
|
1.9869612.110
|
TI1-I-PRO-1223
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
FERGX
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
FGKPX
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
FEMVX
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
FIONX
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
FSKLX
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
FITMX
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
FQITX
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
FIWCX
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
FSUVX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
32%
|
30%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
22%
|
21%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
35%
|
30%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
18%
|
20%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
37%
|
26%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
63%
|
113%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
38%
|
47%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
62%
|
79%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
50%
|
41%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
UBS AG
|
$
|
24,805,017
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
|
$
|
3,754,074
|
|
Barclays PLC
|
$
|
8,072,737
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
994,929
|
0.03%
|
2022
|
$
|
1,282,767
|
0.03%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
516,421
|
0.01%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,385,067
|
0.05%
|
2022
|
$
|
982,065
|
0.05%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
571,863
|
0.04%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
920,431
|
0.03%
|
2022
|
$
|
1,193,468
|
0.05%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
784,844
|
0.06%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
328,397
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
509,436
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
317,520
|
0.01%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
688,900
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
572,695
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
549,298
|
0.01%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
81,227
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
353,733
|
0.03%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
216,255
|
0.04%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
18,593
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
54,769
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
101,714
|
0.02%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
902,802
|
0.02%
|
2022
|
$
|
1,266,304
|
0.02%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
1,319,082
|
0.03%
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
134,108
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
104,357
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
104,075
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
798,905,912
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
3,358,628
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
$
|
271,838,382
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
$
|
1,042,535,402
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
243,023,037
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
255,056,791
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
23,513,897
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
$
|
497,148,276
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
none
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
1,026
|
$
|
913
|
$
|
911
|
$
|
911
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
864
|
$
|
768
|
$
|
766
|
$
|
767
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
$
|
796
|
$
|
708
|
$
|
707
|
$
|
707
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
$
|
1,059
|
$
|
942
|
$
|
939
|
$
|
938
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
1,662
|
$
|
1,480
|
$
|
1,475
|
$
|
1,475
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
160
|
$
|
159
|
$
|
159
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
96
|
$
|
86
|
$
|
85
|
$
|
85
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
$
|
1,292
|
$
|
1,151
|
$
|
1,148
|
$
|
1,148
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
2,353
|
$
|
2,094
|
$
|
2,087
|
$
|
2,086
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
1,024
|
$
|
938
|
$
|
875
|
$
|
1,111
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
862
|
$
|
789
|
$
|
736
|
$
|
935
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
$
|
794
|
$
|
727
|
$
|
678
|
$
|
861
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
$
|
1,056
|
$
|
966
|
$
|
899
|
$
|
1,145
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
1,658
|
$
|
1,518
|
$
|
1,414
|
$
|
1,798
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
179
|
$
|
164
|
$
|
153
|
$
|
194
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
96
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
82
|
$
|
104
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
$
|
1,289
|
$
|
1,182
|
$
|
1,103
|
$
|
1,399
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
2,346
|
$
|
2,147
|
$
|
1,999
|
$
|
2,545
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
909
|
$
|
602
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
765
|
$
|
535
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
$
|
705
|
$
|
470
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
$
|
937
|
$
|
657
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
1,472
|
$
|
981
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
$
|
159
|
$
|
106
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
$
|
85
|
$
|
55
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
$
|
1,145
|
$
|
753
|
||||
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
$
|
2,083
|
$
|
1,394
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® EMERGING MARKETS FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
25.67%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® EMERGING MARKETS FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
64.46%
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® EMERGING MARKETS FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
27.16%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® INTERNATIONAL FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
32.26%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® INTERNATIONAL FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
32.11%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® INTERNATIONAL FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
47.57%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® INTERNATIONAL FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
35.13%
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® INTERNATIONAL FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
83.27%
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® U.S. TOTAL STOCK FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
42.76%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,668,260
|
2022
|
$
|
2,938,191
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,933,900
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
4,607,946
|
2022
|
$
|
2,903,473
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,356,323
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
4,141,661
|
2022
|
$
|
3,833,657
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,125,725
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,323,828
|
2022
|
$
|
1,745,577
|
|
2021
|
$
|
1,708,423
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
8,631,686
|
2022
|
$
|
8,511,049
|
|
2021
|
$
|
8,116,556
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
928,446
|
2022
|
$
|
1,653,797
|
|
2021
|
$
|
899,180
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
489,656
|
2022
|
$
|
696,500
|
|
2021
|
$
|
746,802
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
6,625,871
|
2022
|
$
|
8,202,005
|
|
2021
|
$
|
7,159,039
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
8,268,215
|
2022
|
$
|
7,780,714
|
|
2021
|
$
|
7,411,306
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,312,792
|
2022
|
$
|
2,546,295
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,542,448
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,150,286
|
2022
|
$
|
1,354,845
|
|
2021
|
$
|
1,099,564
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,932,705
|
2022
|
$
|
1,788,828
|
|
2021
|
$
|
991,949
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,456,050
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
1,991,055
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
2,068,744
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
2,589,424
|
2022
|
$
|
2,553,143
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,435,357
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
278,522
|
2022
|
$
|
496,076
|
|
2021
|
$
|
269,833
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
146,883
|
2022
|
$
|
208,930
|
|
2021
|
$
|
224,076
|
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,987,358
|
2022
|
$
|
2,460,758
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,147,671
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,860,018
|
2022
|
$
|
1,750,904
|
|
2021(C)
|
$
|
1,803,075
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0400% to 0.0385%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0435% to 0.0400%.
|
(C) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0250% to 0.0225%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||||||
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI International Index Fund
|
|||||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
1,260,960
|
$
|
160,418
|
$
|
792,475
|
$
|
391,400
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
784,099
|
$
|
155,779
|
$
|
519,299
|
$
|
238,757
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
45,492
|
$
|
418
|
$
|
26,171
|
$
|
14,929
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
829,591
|
$
|
156,197
|
$
|
545,470
|
$
|
253,685
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
431,369
|
$
|
4,221
|
$
|
247,005
|
$
|
137,715
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||||||
Fidelity® SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI International Momentum Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI International Quality Index Fund
|
Fidelity® SAI International Value Index Fund
|
|||||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
1,038,860
|
$
|
43,653
|
$
|
24,380
|
$
|
1,742,641
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
627,931
|
$
|
18,336
|
$
|
18,305
|
$
|
952,085
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
38,591
|
$
|
2,420
|
$
|
579
|
$
|
75,610
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
666,521
|
$
|
20,756
|
$
|
18,884
|
$
|
1,027,694
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
372,339
|
$
|
22,897
|
$
|
5,496
|
$
|
714,947
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|
Fidelity® SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
|
||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
1,041,356
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
753,725
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
22,227
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
775,951
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
265,405
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
FTIHX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
4%
|
3%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
UBS AG
|
$
|
28,236,772
|
Macquarie Group Ltd.
|
$
|
13,821,346
|
|
National Bank of Canada
|
$
|
7,693,118
|
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
|
$
|
4,288,206
|
|
Bank of Montreal
|
$
|
19,427,730
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
337,438
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
626,956
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
777,110
|
0.01%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
$
|
262,042,341
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
|
||
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
$
|
2,792
|
$
|
2,484
|
$
|
2,477
|
$
|
2,478
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
$
|
2,785
|
$
|
2,551
|
$
|
2,378
|
$
|
3,021
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
$
|
2,473
|
$
|
1,687
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
|
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
|
CO
|
9.23%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
64,151
|
$
|
5,862,061
|
2022
|
$
|
1,667
|
$
|
5,099,754
|
|
2021
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
4,297,177
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
4,298,515
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
4,014,193
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
3,528,428
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0475% to 0.0440%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0500% to 0.0475%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|
Fidelity® Total International Index Fund
|
||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
4,435,953
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
2,211,710
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
209,963
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
2,421,673
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
2,014,280
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
FPADX
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
FSGGX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
7%
|
8%
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
8%
|
5%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
UBS AG
|
$
|
28,317,555
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
|
$
|
4,304,246
|
|
National Bank of Canada
|
$
|
7,760,080
|
|
Barclays PLC
|
$
|
9,234,695
|
|
Bank of Montreal
|
$
|
19,786,060
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
521,660
|
0.01%
|
2022
|
$
|
1,147,402
|
0.02%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
981,279
|
0.02%
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
275,403
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
596,231
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
594,195
|
0.01%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
663,401,306
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
659,386,659
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
|
||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
||
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
1,818
|
$
|
1,618
|
$
|
1,613
|
$
|
1,614
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
2,535
|
$
|
2,257
|
$
|
2,251
|
$
|
2,252
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
1,813
|
$
|
1,660
|
$
|
1,549
|
$
|
1,967
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
2,529
|
$
|
2,318
|
$
|
2,162
|
$
|
2,744
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
$
|
1,611
|
$
|
1,086
|
||||
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
2,247
|
$
|
1,521
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund or Class Name
|
Owner Name
|
City
|
State
|
Ownership %
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
FIDELITY® MULTI-ASSET INDEX FUND
|
BOSTON
|
MA
|
10.98%
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
|
GREENWOOD VILLAGE
|
CO
|
5.53%
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
FUTURE VALUE INC
|
NEWARK
|
DE
|
7.62%
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
64,889
|
$
|
4,732,606
|
2022
|
$
|
102,851
|
$
|
4,672,725
|
|
2021
|
$
|
18,464
|
$
|
3,925,231
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
127,082
|
$
|
4,809,860
|
2022
|
$
|
935
|
$
|
4,674,737
|
|
2021
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
4,339,052
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
4,120,449
|
2022
|
$
|
4,067,283
|
|
2021
|
$
|
3,414,724
|
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
3,871,641
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
4,040,241
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
3,909,787
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0475% to 0.0440%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0500% to 0.0475%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||
Fidelity® Emerging Markets Index Fund
|
Fidelity® Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
|||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
2,581,374
|
$
|
1,532,748
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
1,585,006
|
$
|
847,317
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
94,871
|
$
|
65,211
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
1,679,876
|
$
|
912,528
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
901,498
|
$
|
620,220
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
FNIDX
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
FITLX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
22%
|
23%
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
21%
|
9%
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
10,271
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
42,561
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
51,114
|
0.02%
|
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
13,470
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
18,402
|
0.00%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
20,887
|
0.00%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
33,084,088
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
85,021,357
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
$1-$10,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
110
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
98
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
646
|
$
|
575
|
$
|
573
|
$
|
573
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
110
|
$
|
101
|
$
|
94
|
$
|
119
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
644
|
$
|
589
|
$
|
549
|
$
|
698
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
65
|
||||
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
$
|
572
|
$
|
383
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund(s)
|
Fiscal
Years
Ended
|
Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management
Fees
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser
|
||
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
190
|
$
|
763,919
|
2022
|
$
|
5
|
$
|
794,462
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
613,099
|
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
289
|
$
|
2,471,880
|
2022
|
$
|
389
|
$
|
2,484,660
|
|
2021
|
$
|
15
|
$
|
1,201,175
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
295,987
|
2022
|
$
|
307,843
|
|
2021
|
$
|
237,609
|
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
808,784
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
948,483
|
|
2021
|
$
|
464,405
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0425% to 0.0360%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|||
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
|
Fidelity® U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
|
|||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
69,148
|
$
|
75,500
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
60,737
|
$
|
56,258
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
814
|
$
|
1,820
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
61,550
|
$
|
58,079
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
7,598
|
$
|
17,421
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
FITFX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
3%
|
4%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
UBS AG
|
$
|
5,375,764
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
|
$
|
809,384
|
|
National Bank of Canada
|
$
|
1,475,641
|
|
Barclays PLC
|
$
|
1,750,664
|
|
Bank of Montreal
|
$
|
3,769,191
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
64,849
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
105,760
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
135,514
|
0.01%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
$
|
50,977,877
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
|
||
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
$
|
444
|
$
|
395
|
$
|
393
|
$
|
394
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
$
|
442
|
$
|
405
|
$
|
378
|
$
|
480
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
$
|
393
|
$
|
269
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
687,756
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
613,196
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
480,011
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0475% to 0.0440%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0500% to 0.0475%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|
Fidelity Flex® International Index Fund
|
||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
519,085
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
11,666
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
394,054
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
0
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
405,721
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
113,364
|
Fund
|
Ticker
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
FSGEX
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Turnover Rates
|
2023
|
2022
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
6%
|
4%
|
Fund
|
Regular Broker or Dealer
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
UBS AG
|
$
|
121,195,901
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
|
$
|
18,427,550
|
|
National Bank of Canada
|
$
|
33,238,175
|
|
Barclays PLC
|
$
|
39,447,590
|
|
Bank of Montreal
|
$
|
84,623,318
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
Dollar
Amount
|
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
1,250,062
|
0.00%
|
2022
|
$
|
2,364,486
|
0.01%
|
|
2021
|
$
|
2,230,986
|
0.01%
|
Fund
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC)
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
1,538,541,064
|
COMMITTEE
|
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD
|
Operations Committee
|
8
|
Audit Committee
|
4
|
Fair Valuation Committee
|
4
|
Governance and Nominating Committee
|
11
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Jonathan Chiel
|
Abigail P Johnson
|
Christine J Thompson
|
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
over $100,000
|
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer
|
||
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
none
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY
|
over $100,000
|
none
|
||
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
Laura M Bishop(B)
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
John Engler
|
||||
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
10,136
|
$
|
9,020
|
$
|
8,994
|
$
|
8,996
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
563,000
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
496,000
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Robert F Gartland
|
Robert W Helm(D)
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
||||
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
10,109
|
$
|
9,260
|
$
|
8,631
|
$
|
10,966
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
565,000
|
$
|
502,500
|
$
|
492,500
|
$
|
612,500
|
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND
|
Mark A Murray
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E)
|
||||||
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
$
|
8,980
|
$
|
6,134
|
||||
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C)
|
$
|
497,500
|
$
|
0
|
||||
(A) Jonathan Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J. Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by Fidelity.
|
(B) Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(C) Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for 295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M. Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray, $274,597.
|
(D) Mr. Helm served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
Fund
|
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
Sub-Advisory Fees
Paid by FMR
to Geode
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
2023
|
$
|
15,657,351
|
2022(A)
|
$
|
14,565,950
|
|
2021(B)
|
$
|
12,816,254
|
(A) On October 1, 2022, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0475% to 0.0440%.
|
(B) On August 1, 2021, FMR reduced the sub-advisory fee rate paid to Geode from 0.0500% to 0.0475%.
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
9
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,858
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles
|
Other
Accounts
|
|||
Number of Accounts Managed
|
81
|
91
|
8
|
||
Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
||
Assets Managed (in millions)
|
$877,724
|
$107,060
|
$3,672
|
||
Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)
|
none
|
none
|
none
|
Geode Proxy Voting Policies
As an investment adviser, Geode holds voting authority for securities in many of the client accounts that it manages. Geode takes seriously its responsibility to monitor events affecting securities in those client accounts and to exercise its voting authority with respect to those securities in the best interests of its clients (as well as shareholders of mutual funds for which it serves as adviser or sub-adviser). The purposes of these proxy voting policies are to (1) establish a framework for Geode's analysis and decision-making with respect to proxy voting and (2) set forth operational procedures for Geode's exercise of proxy voting authority.
Overview
Geode anticipates that, based on its current business model, it will manage the vast majority of assets under its management using passive investment management techniques, such as indexing. Geode also manages funds and separate accounts using active investment management techniques, primarily employing quantitative investment strategies.
Geode will engage established commercial proxy advisory firms for comprehensive analysis, research and voting recommendations, particularly for matters that may be controversial or require additional analysis under these Policies.
Geode may determine to follow or reject any recommendation based on the research and analysis provided by proxy advisory firms or on any independent research and analysis obtained or generated by Geode. However, Geode has retained a third-party proxy voting service (the "Agent") to affect votes based on the customized policies established by Geode and maintain records of all of Geode's proxy votes. In limited instances where the Policies do not address the specific matter, the Agent will refer the ballot back to Geode. For ballots related to proxy contests, mergers, acquisitions and other organizational transactions, Geode may determine it is appropriate to conduct a company specific evaluation. In cases of proxies not voted by the Agent, the ultimate voting decision and responsibility rests with Geode Proxy. Geode's Operations Committee oversees the exercise of voting authority under these proxy voting policies.
Due to its focused business model and the number of investments that Geode will make for its clients (particularly pursuant to its indexing strategy), Geode does not anticipate that actual or potential conflicts of interest are likely to occur in the ordinary course of its business. However, Geode believes it is essential to avoid having conflicts of interest affect its objective of voting in the best interests of its clients. Therefore, in the event that members of the Operations Committee, the Agent or any other person involved in the analysis or voting of proxies has knowledge of, or has reason to believe there may exist, any potential relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode (or any affiliate of Geode) or their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, such person shall notify the other members of the Operations Committee. Geode will analyze and address such potential conflict of interest, consulting with outside counsel, as appropriate. In the case of an actual conflict of interest, on the advice of counsel, Geode expects that the independent directors of Geode will consider the matter and may (1) determine that there is no conflict of interest (or that reasonable measures have been taken to remedy or avoid any conflict of interest) that would prevent Geode from voting the applicable proxy, (2) abstain, (3) cause authority to be delegated to the Agent or a similar special fiduciary to vote the applicable proxy or (4) recommend other methodology for mitigating the conflict of interest, if deemed appropriate (e.g., echo voting).
Geode has established the specific proxy voting policies that are summarized below to maximize the value of investments in its clients' accounts, which it believes will be furthered through (1) accountability of a company's management and directors to its shareholders, (2) alignment of the interests of management with those of shareholders (including through compensation, benefit and equity ownership programs), and (3) increased disclosure of a company's business and operations. Geode reserves the right to override any of its proxy voting policies with respect to a particular shareholder vote when such an override is, in Geode's best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of Geode's clients.
Policies
All proxy votes shall be considered and made in a manner consistent with the best interests of Geode's clients (as well as shareholders of mutual fund clients) without regard to any other relationship, business or otherwise, between the portfolio company subject to the proxy vote and Geode or its affiliates. As a general matter, (1) proxies will be voted FOR incumbent members of a board of directors and FOR routine management proposals, except as otherwise addressed under these policies; (2) shareholder and non-routine management proposals addressed by these policies will be voted as provided in these policies; and (3) shareholder and non-routine management proposals not addressed by these policies will be evaluated by Geode ESG Stewardship based on fundamental analysis and/or research and recommendations provided by the Agent and other third-party proxy advisory firms.
When voting the securities of non-US issuers, Geode will evaluate proposals in accordance with these policies but will also take local market standards and best practices into consideration. Geode may also limit or modify its voting at certain non-US meetings (e.g., if shares are required to be blocked or reregistered in connection with voting).
Geode's specific policies are as follows:
I. Election of Directors
Geode will generally vote FOR incumbent members of a board of directors except:
• Attendance. The incumbent board member failed to attend at least 75% of meetings in the previous year and does not provide a reasonable explanation.
• Independent Directors. Nominee is not independent and full board comprises less than a majority of independents. Nominee is not independent and sits on the audit, compensation or nominating committee.
• Director Responsiveness. The board failed to act on shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. The board failed to act on takeover offers where Geode and a majority of shareholders tendered their shares. At the previous board election, directors opposed by Geode received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast, and the company failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
• Golden Parachutes. Incumbent members of the compensation committee adopted or renewed an excessive golden parachute within the past year.
• Gender Diversity. If there are no women on the Board unless the Board has made a firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status when there was a woman on the Board at the preceding annual meeting.
• Overboarding. The Director is a CEO and sits on the Board of more than two public companies besides his or her own; or a non-CEO Director who sits on more than five public company boards.
• Unequal Voting Rights. If the Company maintains a common stock structure with unequal voting rights. Exceptions to the policy may include, but aren't limited to: Newly-public companies with a reasonable sunset provision, where the unequal voting rights are considered de minimis; or the company provides sufficient safeguards for minority shareholders.
• In Other Circumstances when a member of the board has acted in a manner inconsistent with the interests of shareholders of a company whose securities are held in client accounts.
II. Majority Election. Unless a company has a policy achieving a similar result, Geode will generally vote in favor of a proposal calling for directors to be elected by a majority of votes cast in a board election provided that the plurality vote applies when there are more nominees than board seats.
III. Say on Pay (non-binding).
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Geode will generally vote AGAINST advisory vote when: (1) there is a significant misalignment between executive pay and company performance; (2) the company maintains significant problematic pay practices; or (3) the board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness to shareholders.
• Frequency Vote. Geode will generally vote FOR having an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
• Advisory Vote on Golden Parachute. Geode will vote AGAINST excessive change-in-control severance payments.
IV. Vote AGAINST Anti-Takeover Proposals, including:
• Addition of Special Interest Directors to the board.
• Authorization of "Blank Check" Preferred Stock. Geode will vote FOR proposals to require shareholder approval for the distribution of preferred stock except for acquisitions and raising capital in the ordinary course of business.
• Classification of Boards, Geode will vote FOR proposals to de-classify boards.
• Fair Price Amendments, other than those that consider only a two-year price history and are not accompanied by other anti-takeover measures.
• Golden Parachutes, that Geode deems to be excessive in the event of change-in-control.
• Poison Pills. Adoption or extension of a Poison Pill without shareholder approval will result in our voting AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors, provided the matter will be considered if (a) the board has adopted a Poison Pill with a sunset provision; (b) the Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; (c) the term is less than three years; (d) the Pill includes a qualifying offer clause; Or (e) shareholder approval is required to reinstate the expired Pill. Geode will vote FOR shareholder proposals requiring or recommending that shareholders be given an opportunity to vote on the adoption of poison pills.
• Reduction or Limitation of Shareholder Rights (e.g., action by written consent, ability to call meetings, or remove directors).
• Reincorporation in another state (when accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions, including increased statutory anti-takeover provisions). Geode will vote FOR reincorporation in another state when not accompanied by such anti-takeover provisions.
• Requirements that the Board Consider Non-Financial Effects of merger and acquisition proposals.
• Requirements regarding Size, Selection and Removal of the Board that are likely to have an anti-takeover effect (although changes with legitimate business purposes will be evaluated).
• Supermajority Voting Requirements (i.e., typically 2/3 or greater) for boards and shareholders. Geode will vote FOR proposals to eliminate supermajority voting requirements.
• Transfer of Authority from Shareholders to Directors.
V. Vote FOR proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to Opt Out of the Control Shares Acquisition Statutes.
VI. Vote AGAINST the introduction of new classes of Stock with Differential Voting Rights.
VII. Vote AGAINST introduction and FOR elimination of Cumulative Voting Rights, except in certain instances where it is determined not to enhance shareholders' interests.
VIII. Vote FOR elimination of Preemptive Rights.
IX. Vote FOR Anti-Greenmail proposals so long as they are not part of anti-takeover provisions (in which case the vote will be AGAINST).
X. Vote FOR charter and by-law amendments expanding the Indemnification of Directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law (regardless of the state of incorporation) and vote AGAINST charter and by-law amendments completely Eliminating Directors' Liability for Breaches of Care.
XI. Vote FOR proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.
XII. Vote FOR Open-Market Stock Repurchase Programs, unless there is clear evidence of past abuse of the authority; the plan contains no safeguards against selective buybacks, or the authority can be used as an anti-takeover mechanism.
XIII. Vote FOR management proposals to implement a Reverse Stock Split when the number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced or the Reverse Stock Split is necessary to avoid de-listing.
XIV. Vote FOR management proposals to Reduce the Par Value of common stock unless the proposal may facilitate an anti-takeover device or other negative corporate governance action.
XV. Vote FOR the Issuance of Large Blocks of Stock if such proposals have a legitimate business purpose and do not result in dilution of greater than 20%. However, a company's specific circumstances and market practices may be considered in determining whether the proposal is consistent with shareholders' interests.
XVI. Vote AGAINST Excessive Increases in Common Stock. Vote AGAINST increases in authorized common stock that would result in authorized capital in excess of three times the company's shares outstanding and reserved for legitimate purposes. For non-U.S. securities with conditional capital requests, vote AGAINST issuances of shares with preemptive rights in excess of 100% of the company's current shares outstanding. Special requests will be evaluated, taking company-specific circumstances into account.
XVII. Vote AGAINST the adoption of or amendment to authorize additional shares under a Stock Option Plan if:
• The stock option plan includes evergreen provisions, which provides for an automatic allotment of equity compensation every year.
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan (including by virtue of any "evergreen" or replenishment provision), plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
• The offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus, except that a modest number of shares (limited to 5% for a large capitalization company and 10% for a small and micro capitalization companies) may be available for grant to employees and directors under the plan if the grant is made by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors (the "De Minimis Exception").
• The plan is administered by (1) a compensation committee not comprised entirely of independent directors or (2) a board of directors not comprised of a majority of independent directors, provided that a plan is acceptable if it satisfies the De Minimis Exception.
• The plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options, or the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval, unless by the express terms of the plan or a board resolution such repricing is rarely used (and then only to maintain option value due to extreme circumstances beyond management's control) and is within the limits of the De Minimis Exception.
• Liberal Definition of Change in Control: the plan provides that the vesting of equity awards may accelerate even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XVIII. Vote AGAINST the election of incumbent members of the compensation committee or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if, within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options.
XIX. Evaluate proposals to Reprice Outstanding Stock Options, taking into account such factors as: (1) whether the repricing proposal excludes senior management and directors; (2) whether the options proposed to be repriced exceeded the dilution thresholds described in these current proxy voting policies when initially granted; (3) whether the repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable options pricing model; (4) the company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries; (5) economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and (6) other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether a repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.
XX. Vote AGAINST adoption of or amendments to authorize additional shares for Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") if:
• The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other option or restricted stock plans, is greater than 10%. However, dilution may be increased to 15% for small capitalization companies, and 20% for micro capitalization companies, respectively. If the plan fails this test, the dilution effect may be evaluated relative to any unusual factor involving the company.
XXI. Vote AGAINST Omnibus Stock Plans if one or more component violates any of the criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, unless such component is de minimis. In the case of an omnibus stock plan, the dilution limits applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies will be measured against the total number of shares under all components of such plan.
XXII. Vote AGAINST Employee Stock Purchase Plans if the plan violates any of the relevant criteria applicable to Stock Option Plans or RSAs under these proxy voting policies, except that (1) the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity, and (2) in the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to the prevailing "best practices," as articulated by the Agent, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.
XXIII. Vote AGAINST Stock Awards (other than stock options and RSAs) unless it is determined they are identified as being granted to officers/directors in lieu of salary or cash bonus, subject to number of shares being reasonable.
XXIV. Vote AGAINST equity vesting acceleration programs or amendments to authorize additional shares under such programs if the program provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.
XXV. Vote FOR Employee Stock Ownership Plans ("ESOPs") of non-leveraged ESOPs, and in the case of leveraged ESOPs, giving consideration to the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. Geode may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. Geode will vote AGAINST a leveraged ESOP if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon a change in control.
XXVI. Vote AGAINST management or shareholder proposals on other Compensation Plans or Practices if such plans or practices are Inconsistent with the Interests of Shareholders. In addition, Geode may vote AGAINST the election of incumbents or a management slate in the concurrent or next following vote on the election of directors if Geode believes a board has approved executive compensation arrangements inconsistent with the interests of shareholders.
XXVII. Environmental and Social Proposals. Evaluate each proposal related to environmental and social issues (including political contributions). Generally, Geode expects to vote with management's recommendation on shareholder proposals concerning environmental or social issues, as Geode believes management and the board are ordinarily in the best position to address these matters. Geode may support certain shareholder environmental and social proposals that request additional disclosures from companies which may provide material information to the investment management process, or where Geode otherwise believes support will help maximize shareholder value. Geode may take action against the re-election of board members if there are serious concerns over ESG practices or the board failed to act on related shareholder proposals that received approval by Geode and a majority of the votes cast in the previous year.
XXVIII. Geode will generally vote FOR proposals seeking to establish or amend proxy access which allow a shareholder (or shareholder group) holding at least 3% of the voting power of the company's outstanding shares continuously for a minimum of 3 years the ability to nominate no more than 25% of the board of directors. Geode will generally vote AGAINST proposals that do not meet the aforementioned criteria.
XXIX. Shares of Investment Companies.
• For institutional accounts, Geode will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees, unless voting is not permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
• For retail managed accounts, Geode will employ echo voting when voting shares. To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, if an investment company has a shareholder meeting, Geode would vote their shares in the investment company in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the investment company.
|
To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.
|
Security Lending Activities
|
Fund(s)
|
|
Fidelity® Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
|
||
Gross income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
47,609,251
|
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split
|
$
|
0
|
Administrative fees
|
$
|
0
|
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
$
|
38,490,204
|
Other fees not included in the revenue split (lending agent fees to NFS)
|
$
|
887,827
|
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
$
|
39,378,032
|
Net income from securities lending activities
|
$
|
8,231,219
|
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
Post-Effective Amendment No. 573
PART C. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 28.
Exhibits
(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(b)
(c)
Not applicable.
(d)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
(143)
(144)
(145)
(e)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(f)
(g)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
(h)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(i)
Legal Opinion of Dechert LLP, dated December 20, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (i).
(j)
(1)
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated December 20, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (j)(1).
(2)
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated December 20, 2023, is filed herein as Exhibit (j)(2).
(k)
Not applicable.
(l)
Not applicable.
(m)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(n)
(1)
(2)
(p)
(1)
(2)
Item 29.
Persons Controlled by or under Common Control with the Trust
The Board of Trustees of the Trust is the same as the board of other Fidelity funds, each of which has Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, or an affiliate, or Geode Capital Management LLC, as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Trust are substantially identical to those of the other Fidelity funds. Nonetheless, the Trust takes the position that it is not under common control with other Fidelity funds because the power residing in the respective boards and officers arises as the result of an official position with the respective trusts.
Item 30.
Indemnification
Article XI, Section 2 of the Declaration of Trust sets forth the reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification shall be provided to any past or present Trustee or officer. It states that the Trust shall indemnify any present or past trustee or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability, and all expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of his or her service as a trustee or officer and against any amount incurred in settlement thereof. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudged by a court or other adjudicatory body to be liable to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of his or her duties (collectively, disabling conduct), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination, as specified in the Declaration of Trust, that the officer or trustee did not engage in disabling conduct.
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Distributor and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Trust (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Trust does not agree to indemnify the Distributor or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Trust by or on behalf of the Distributor. In no case is the indemnity of the Trust in favor of the Distributor or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Distributor or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which the Distributor or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.
Pursuant to the agreement by which Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC (FIIOC) is appointed transfer agent, the Registrant agrees to indemnify and hold FIIOC harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) resulting from:
(1)
any claim, demand, action, or suit brought by any person other than the Registrant, including by a shareholder, which names FIIOC and/or the Registrant as a party and is not based on and does not result from FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties, and arises out of or in connection with FIIOCs performance under the Transfer Agency Agreement; or
(2)
any claim, demand, action or suit (except to the extent contributed to by FIIOCs willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties) which results from the negligence of the Registrant, or from FIIOCs acting upon any instruction(s) reasonably believed by it to have been executed or communicated by any person duly authorized by the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon advice reasonably believed by FIIOC to have been given by counsel for the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOCs acting in reliance upon any instrument or stock certificate reasonably believed by it to have been genuine and signed, countersigned or executed by the proper person.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Registrant, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Item 31.
Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser(s)
(1) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC (FMR)
FMR serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies. The directors and officers of the Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Abigail P. Johnson | Chairman of the Board of certain Trusts; Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR LLC; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. Previously served as Chairman of the Board and Director FMRC. |
Peter S. Lynch | Vice Chairman and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and a member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR. Previously served as Vice Chairman and Director of FMRC. |
Cynthia Lo Bessette | Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; Secretary Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022); Previously served as Senior Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer FMRC; Secretary SelectCo, LLC and FIMM; Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Lisa D. Krieser | Assistant Secretary Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC and Fidelity Distributors Company LLC, Secretary FMR Capital, Inc and Strategic Advisers LLC (2022). |
Bart Grenier | President of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC. |
Margaret Serravalli | Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR). |
Michael Shulman | Assistant Treasurer Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) (2022), Fidelity Diversifying Solutions LLC (2022), FIMM (2022), Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FMR LLC (2023), FMR Capital, Inc. (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Executive Vice President, Tax of FMR LLC (2023). |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jason Pogorelec | Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023). |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(2) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (HONG KONG) LIMITED (FMR H.K.)
FMR H.K. provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Sharon Yau Lecornu | Chief Executive Officer of FMR H.K., Executive Director of FMR H.K., Director of Investment Services Asia, and Director of FMR H.K. | ||
William Francis Shanley III | Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. | ||
James Lenton | Director of FMR H.K. (2023). | ||
Adrian James Tyerman | Compliance Officer FMR H.K. and FMR UK, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. | ||
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. | ||
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. | ||
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(3) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (JAPAN) LIMITED (FMR JAPAN)
FMR Japan provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Timothy M. Cohen | Director of FMR Japan; Executive Vice President SelectCo, LLC. |
Nathaniel Norr Salter | Director of FMR Japan (2023). |
Rieko Hirai | Director of FMR Japan. |
Kan Man Wong | Director of FMR Japan. |
Kirk Roland Neureiter | Director of FMR Japan. |
William Francis Shanley III | Director of FMR Japan and FMR H.K. |
Koichi Iwabuchi | Statutory Auditor of FMR Japan; Previously served as Compliance Officer of FMR Japan. |
Kenji Kanemasu | Compliance Officer of FMR Japan (2023). |
Christopher Rimmer | Treasurer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers LLC; President and Director FMR Capital Inc.; Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2021). Previously served as Treasurer of FMRC, FIMM, and SelectCo, LLC; Chief Accounting Officer FMR LLC. |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
(4) FMR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (UK) LIMITED (FMR UK)
FMR UK provides investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
Mark D. Flaherty | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Niamh Brodie-Machura | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Christopher J. Seabolt | Director of FMR UK; Previously served as Director of FMR HK (2023). |
Adrian James Tyerman | Compliance Officer FMR H.K. Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
Stephanie J. Brown | Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (2023), FDS (2023), FIAM (2023), FMR H.K. (2023), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (2023), FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023), and Strategic Advisers LLC (2023); Assistant Treasurer FMR Capital, Inc.. |
Jean-Philippe Provost | Director FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (2023). |
Margaret Carey | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC; and Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K, FMR Japan and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited. |
|
|
(5) GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC (Geode)
Geode serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies AND OTHER ACCOUNTS. Geode may also provide investment advisory services to other investment advisers. The directors and officers have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.
David Lane | President and Chief Executive Officer (2023). |
Jeffrey S. Miller | Chief Operating Officer. |
Michael Ciccone | Chief Compliance Officer (2023). |
Sorin Codreanu | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
Matt Nevins | General Counsel. |
Gerard McGraw | Director (2023). |
Franklin Corning Kenly | Director. |
Arlene Rockefeller | Director. |
Eric Roiter | Director. |
Jennifer Uhrig | Director. |
Philip L. Bullen | Director. |
Thomas Sprague | Director. |
Michael Even | Director. |
Alok Kapoor | Director (2022). |
|
|
Principal business addresses of the investment adviser, sub-advisers and affiliates.
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.)
Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central
Hong Kong
Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (FMR Japan)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (FMR UK)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FIL Investment Advisors (FIA)
Pembroke Hall
42 Crow Lane
Pembroke HM19, Bermuda
FIL Investment Advisors (UK) Limited (FIA(UK))
Beech Gate Millfield Lane
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey
KT20 6RP, United Kingdom
Strategic Advisers LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC)
900 Salem Street
Smithfield, RI 02917
Geode Capital Management, LLC (Geode)
100 Summer Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Fidelity Management Trust Company
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Fidelity Investors Management LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Item 32.
Principal Underwriters
(a)
Fidelity Distributors Company LLC (FDC) acts as distributor for all funds advised by FMR or an affiliate, as well as Fidelity Commodity Strategy Central Fund and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund.
(b) |
|
|
Name and Principal | Positions and Offices | Positions and Offices |
Business Address* | with Underwriter | with Fund |
Robert Adams | Chief Operating Officer (2021) | None |
Robert F. Bachman | Executive Vice President and Director (2023) | None |
Dalton Gustafson | President (2021) and Director (2023) | None |
Natalie Kavanaugh | Chief Legal Officer | None |
Michael Lyons | Chief Financial Officer | None |
John McGinty | Chief Compliance Officer (2021) | None |
Timothy Mulcahy | Director | None |
John Slyconish | Treasurer | None |
Natalie Kavanaugh | Secretary | None |
Lisa D. Krieser | Assistant Secretary | None |
Michael Shulman | Assistant Treasurer (2022) | None |
* 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI
(c)
Not applicable.
Item 33.
Location of Accounts and Records
All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder are maintained by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC or Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, LLC, 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210, or the funds respective custodians, or special purpose custodian, as applicable, The Bank of New York Mellon, 1 Wall Street, New York, NY; Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., 50 Post Office Square, Boston, MA; Citibank, N.A., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY, 10013; State Street Bank & Trust Company, 1 Lincoln Street, Boston, MA; and The Northern Trust Company, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60675.
Item 34.
Management Services
Not applicable.
Item 35.
Undertakings
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 573 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 26th day of December 2023.
| Fidelity Salem Street Trust | ||
| By | /s/Laura M. Del Prato |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Signature) |
| (Title) | (Date) |
|
|
|
|
/s/Laura M. Del Prato |
| President and Treasurer | December 26, 2023 |
Laura M. Del Prato |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John J. Burke III |
| Chief Financial Officer | December 26, 2023 |
John J. Burke III |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Abigail P. Johnson | | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Abigail P. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Elizabeth S. Acton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Laura M. Bishop | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Laura M. Bishop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jonathan Chiel | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Jonathan Chiel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Ann E. Dunwoody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/John Engler | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
John Engler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert W. Helm | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Robert W. Helm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Arthur E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Michael E. Kenneally | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Mark A. Murray | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Mark A. Murray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Christine J. Thompson | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Christine J. Thompson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Carol J. Zierhoffer | * | Trustee | December 26, 2023 |
Carol J. Zierhoffer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| By: | /s/ Stephanie J. Brown |
|
| Stephanie J. Brown, pursuant to a power of attorney dated January 26, 2023 and filed herewith. |
* | By: | /s/Megan C. Johnson |
|
| Megan C. Johnson, pursuant to powers of attorney dated October 5, 2016, January 11, 2023, and October 18, 2023, and filed herewith. |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust | Fidelity Municipal Trust |
Fidelity Advisor Series II | Fidelity Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Advisor Series IV | Fidelity Newbury Street Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust | Fidelity New York Municipal Trust |
Fidelity California Municipal Trust II | Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II |
Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC | Fidelity Oxford Street Trust |
Fidelity Charles Street Trust | Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II |
Fidelity Colchester Street Trust | Fidelity Phillips Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust | Fidelity Revere Street Trust |
Fidelity Court Street Trust II | Fidelity Salem Street Trust |
Fidelity Garrison Street Trust | Fidelity School Street Trust |
Fidelity Hereford Street Trust | Fidelity Union Street Trust |
Fidelity Income Fund | Fidelity Union Street Trust II |
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust | Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust |
|
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Trustee (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby constitute and appoint Stephanie J. Brown, my true and lawful attorney- in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post- Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorney-in-fact deems necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact or her substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect only for such time as Stephanie J. Brown shall continue to be an officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, this Power of Attorney may be revoked at any time by the undersigned in writing.
This Power of Attorney has been executed as of January 26, 2023.
/s/ Abigail P. Johnson
Abigail P. Johnson
POWER OF ATTORNEY
I, the undersigned Trustee of the following investment company:
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individual serves as Director or Trustee (collectively, the Funds), hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, Marc R. Bryant, John V. OHanlon, Robert W. Helm, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after October 5, 2016.
WITNESS my hand on this 5th day of October, 2016.
/s/Jonathan Chiel |
|
Jonathan Chiel |
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust Fidelity Advisor Series II Fidelity Advisor Series IV Fidelity Boylston Street Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust II Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC Fidelity Charles Street Trust Fidelity Colchester Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust II Fidelity Garrison Street Trust Fidelity Hereford Street Trust Fidelity Income Fund Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust | Fidelity Money Market Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust II Fidelity Newbury Street Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II Fidelity Oxford Street Trust Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II Fidelity Phillips Street Trust Fidelity Revere Street Trust Fidelity Salem Street Trust Fidelity School Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust II Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the Funds), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment company for which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, John V. OHanlon, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after January 11, 2023.
WITNESS our hands on this eleventh day of January 2023.
/s/Elizabeth S. Acton | /s/Michael E. Kenneally |
Elizabeth S. Acton | Michael E. Kenneally |
|
|
/s/Ann E. Dunwoody | /s/Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
Ann E. Dunwoody | Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
|
|
/s/John Engler | /s/Mark A. Murray |
John Engler | Mark A. Murray |
|
|
/s/Robert F. Gartland |
|
Robert F. Gartland |
|
|
|
/s/Arthur E. Johnson |
|
Arthur E. Johnson |
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:
Fidelity Advisor Series II Fidelity Advisor Series IV Fidelity Boylston Street Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust Fidelity California Municipal Trust II Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC Fidelity Charles Street Trust Fidelity Colchester Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust Fidelity Court Street Trust II Fidelity Garrison Street Trust Fidelity Hereford Street Trust Fidelity Income Fund Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust | Fidelity Money Market Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust Fidelity Municipal Trust II Fidelity Newbury Street Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II Fidelity Oxford Street Trust Fidelity Oxford Street Trust II Fidelity Phillips Street Trust Fidelity Revere Street Trust Fidelity Salem Street Trust Fidelity School Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust Fidelity Union Street Trust II Variable Insurance Products Fund V |
in addition to any other Fidelity Fund for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the Funds), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment company for which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, John V. OHanlon, Megan C. Johnson, and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after October 18, 2023.
WITNESS our hands on this eighteenth day of October 2023.
/s/Laura M. Bishop | /s/Christine J. Thompson |
Laura M. Bishop | Christine J. Thompson |
|
|
/s/Robert W. Helm | /s/Carol J. Zierhoffer |
Robert W. Helm | Carol J. Zierhoffer |
Schedule A
Name of Trust | Name of Fund/Class | Basis Point Expense Rate | Expiration Date |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust | Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.5 | 04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust | Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund | 3.5 | 04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust | Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.5 | 04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Concord Street Trust | Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.5 | 04/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 7.5 | 12/31/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 5.5 | 12/31/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.5 | 06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund | 3.5 | 06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 2.5 | 06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | 2.5 | 06/30/2024 |
Fidelity Salem Street Trust | Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund | 2.5 | 10/31/2024 |
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY LLC | ||
By | /s/Christopher J. Rimmer | |
Christopher J. Rimmer | ||
FIDELITY CONCORD STREET TRUST, | ||
on behalf of the Funds listed on Schedule A | ||
By | /s/Stacie M. Smith | |
Stacie M. Smith | ||
FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST, | ||
on behalf of the Funds listed on Schedule A | ||
By | /s/Laura M. Del Prato | |
Laura M. Del Prato |
Dechert LLP
One International Place, 40th Floor
100 Oliver Street
Boston, MA 02110-2605
+1 617 728 7100 Main
+1 617 426 6567 Fax
www.dechert.com
December 20, 2023
Fidelity Salem Street Trust
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
Re: Post-Effective Amendment No. 573 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as counsel to Fidelity Salem Street Trust, a Massachusetts business trust (the Trust) and its separate series Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund, Fidelity Flex International Index Fund, Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund, Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund, Fidelity Total International Index Fund, and Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (the Funds), in connection with Post-Effective Amendment No. 573 to the Trusts Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the Amendment) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
In connection with the opinions set forth herein, you have provided to us originals, copies or facsimile transmissions of, and we have reviewed and relied upon, among other things, copies of the following: the Amendment; the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust dated May 16, 2001, as amended; the By-Laws of the Trust dated June 17, 2004 (the By-Laws); and other such Trust records, certificates, resolutions, documents and statutes that we have deemed relevant in order to render the opinion expressed herein. In addition, we have reviewed and relied upon a Certificate issued by the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
In rendering this opinion we have assumed, without independent verification, (i) the due authority of all individuals signing in representative capacities and the genuineness of signatures; (ii) the authenticity, completeness and continued effectiveness of all documents or copies furnished to us; (iii) that any resolutions provided have been duly adopted by the Trusts Board of Trustees;
(iv) that the facts contained in the instruments and certificates or statements of public officials, officers and representatives of the Trust on which we have relied for the purposes of this opinion are true and correct; and (v) that no amendments, agreements, resolutions or actions have been approved, executed or adopted which would limit, supersede or modify the items described above. Where documents are referred to in resolutions approved by the Board of Trustees, or in the Amendment, we have assumed such documents are the same as in the most recent form provided to us, whether as an exhibit to the Amendment or otherwise. When any opinion set forth below relates to the existence or standing of the Trust, such opinion is based entirely upon and is limited by the items referred to above, and we understand that the foregoing assumptions, limitations and qualifications are acceptable to you.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Funds shares registered under the Securities Act, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of purchase described in the Amendment, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
The opinion expressed herein are given as of the date hereof and we undertake no obligation and hereby disclaim any obligation to advise you of any change after the date of this opinion pertaining to any matter referred to herein. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Amendment and to the use of our name in the Amendment unless and until we revoke such consent. In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Dechert LLP
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post–Effective Amendment to Registration Statement No. 002-41839 on Form N–1A of our reports dated December 13, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fund, Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund, and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund, and our reports dated December 14, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund and Fidelity Flex International Index Fund, each a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of Fidelity Salem Street Trust for the year ended October 31, 2023, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” or “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms” in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of such Registration Statement.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 20, 2023
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information in Post–Effective Amendment No. 573 to the Registration Statement on Form N–1A of Fidelity Salem Street Trust: Fidelity SAI International Momentum Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund, and Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund of our reports dated December 12, 2023; Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Index Fund, and Fidelity Total International Index Fund of our reports dated December 13, 2023; Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund, Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund, Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund, and Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund of our reports dated December 14, 2023, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights, which appear in the above referenced funds’ Annual Reports to Shareholders on Form N-CSR for the period ended October 31, 2023. We also consent to the references to our Firm under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statements of Additional Information.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 20, 2023