As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ___________

Registration No. 1-32489            

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10

GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
Pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) ofthe
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Omega Flex, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania 23-1948942
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
 Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

451 Creamery Way
Exton, Pennsylvania
19341
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (610) 524-7272

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Each Class
to be so Registered
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Each Class is to be Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share NASDAQ National Market *


  * Application pending


Omega Flex, Inc.

Cross-Reference Sheet Between the Information Statement and Items of Form 10

Information Included in the Information Statement and Incorporated by Reference into the Registration Statement on Form 10

Item
No.
Caption Location in Information Statement

  1
Business "Summary"; "Industry Overview"; "Description of Our
   Business"; and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
   Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

  2
Financial Information "Summary Financial Information"; "Unaudited Pro Forma
   Financial Statements"; and "Management's Discussion and
   Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

  3
Properties "Description of Our Business - Property."

  4
Securities Ownership of Certain "Security Ownership of Management."
   Beneficial Owners and Management

  5
Directors and Officers "Our Management."

  6
Executive Compensation "Our Management - Executive Compensation."

  7
Certain Relationships and Related "Summary"; "Description of the Distribution - Our
   Transactions Relationship with Mestek after the Distribution"; "Risk
   Factors - Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock";
   "Our Management"; and "Relationships Between our Company and
   Mestek, Inc."

  8
Legal Proceedings "Description of Omega Flex Business - Legal Proceedings."

  9
Market Price of and Dividends on the "Summary"; "Description of the Distribution"; "Dividend
   Registrant's Common Equity and Related Policy"; "Distribution - Our Relationship with Mestek after
   Stockholder Matters the Distribution"; and "Description of Capital Stock"

 10
Recent Sales of Unregistered "Description of Capital Stock"
   Securities

 11
Description of Registrant's Securities "Description of Capital Stock"
   to be Registered

 12
Indemnification of Directors and Officers "Indemnification of Directors and Officers."

 13
Financial Statements and Supplementary "Summary Financial Information"; "Unaudited Pro Forma
   Data Financial Statements"; and "Management's Discussion and
   Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

 14
Changes In and Disagreements with
   Accountants on Accounting and None.
   Financial Matters
15 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  (a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

  The following financial statements are included in the Information Statement and filed as a part of this Registration Statement on Form 10:

  (1) Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements of Omega Flex, Inc.; and

  (2) Consolidated Financial Statements of Omega Flex, Inc.

  (b) Exhibits. The following documents are filed as exhibits hereto:

Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
3 .1 Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Omega Flex, Inc.  
3 .2 Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Omega Flex, Inc.  
10 .1 Form of Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement between Mestek, Inc. and the Registrant  
10 .2 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and various of its directors and officers  
10 .3 Schedule of directors and officers with Indemnification Agreement  
10 .4 Form of Tax Allocation Agreement between Mestek, Inc. and the Registrant  
10 .5 Employment Agreement with Kevin R. Hoben, dated as of April 15, 1996  
10 .6 Employment Agreement with Mark F. Albino, dated as of April 22, 1996  
10 .7 Form of Separation and Distribution Agreement  
10._ _ Form of Credit Agreement to be entered into among the Registrant and Bank of America, N.A. *  
10._ _ Form of Transitional Services Agreement *  
10._ _ Shareholder Agreement dated July 1, 1996 *  
10._ _ Promissory Note between Mestek as Borrower and Omega Flex as Lender*  
14 .1 Code of Business Ethics  
21 .1 List of Subsidiaries  
23 .1 Consent of Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd.  
99 .1 Information Statement  
99 .2 Corporate Governance Guidelines  
  * To be filed by amendment.


SIGNATURE

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: June 22, 2005 OMEGA FLEX, INC.


BY: /S/ Kevin R. Hoben
——————————————
Kevin R. Hoben
President

OMEGA FLEX, INC.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

        Except for those matters reserved for decision by the Company’s stockholders, the Board of Directors is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company and the management of the Company is vested with the Board. The Board’s primary responsibility is to oversee the affairs of the Company for the benefit of its stockholders. The Board shall be entitled to consider the interests and needs of employees, customers, suppliers, communities and the greater good of society as it makes its best business judgments as to the long-term and short-term interests of the Company and its shareholders. It elects the senior management team, which is charged with the day-to-day conduct of the Company’s business, and the Board acts as an advisor and counselor to the management team and monitors its performance. Significant policy matters or matters involving significant issues of risk management will be considered by the Board, or, if arising between meetings, by the Executive Committee of the Board.

Selection and Composition of the Board

1. Board Membership Criteria

  The Nominating/Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the appropriate skills, values and qualifications desired of Board members. This assessment should include skills such as understanding of the application and use of some or all of the Company’s products, various manufacturing technologies, an understanding of general accounting principles as applied in the preparation and reporting of financial statements of a public company, and expertise and knowledge of management of a large multi-facility organization, international experience, and other pertinent characteristics ¯ all in the context of an assessment of the then current perceived needs of the Company. No Director shall serve as a director, officer or employee of a competitor of the Company. Each Board member should be a stockholder in the Company with a minimum of 500 shares owned within six months of election or appointment. Board members should be in a position to fully prepare for, regularly attend and actively participate in Board and Committee meetings and related functions. It is the sense of the Board that its members should be limited to no more than three other public company board memberships, though exception may be made in certain circumstances.

2. Selection and Orientation of New Directors

  The Board itself is responsible for determining the optimum size of the Board, and selecting its own members for filling vacancies and in recommending nominees for election by the stockholders. The Board delegates the screening process involved to the Nominating/Governance Committee with the input from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Board and the Company will develop and maintain a complete orientation process for new Directors that includes background material, meetings with senior management and visits to Company facilities.

3. Extending the Invitation to a Potential Director to Join the Board

  Upon review and approval of a prospective nominee by the entire Board, the invitation to join the Board should be extended by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on behalf of the Board.

Board Leadership

4. Selection of Chairman and CEO

  The Board will choose from its members a Chairman with due consideration for the experience, skills and values of a prospective nominee to this position.

  It is the policy of the Board that the position of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer be held by the same person, except in unusual situations.

5. Lead Director

  The Board will select a non-management Director who will assume the responsibility of chairing the regularly scheduled meetings of non-management Directors or other responsibilities which the non-management Directors as a whole might designate from time to time. A Vice Chairman of the Board, if one is designated, may fulfill the responsibilities of the Lead Director position.

Board Composition

6. Size of the Board

  The Bylaws of the Company currently authorizes three to fourteen members, and the Board in the recent past has ranged from seven to nine members. It is the sense of the Board that this size is appropriate and useful. However, the Board would be willing to go to a somewhat larger size in order to accommodate the availability of an outstanding candidate(s).

7. Mix of Independent and Management Directors

  The Board believes that as a matter of policy, the Board should consist of a majority of independent directors.

  A director shall not be deemed to be “independent” of the Company if he or she has a legal, business, or financial relationship to the Company (other than in his or her capacity as a director or a shareholder) that is either (a) material to the director, or (b) material to the director’s employer, any organization with which the director is affiliated, or to any immediate family member of the director.

  Notwithstanding the above, a director shall not be deemed to be “independent” if, within the past three years, he or she (a) has been an employee of the Company, (b) received more than $60,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company (other than compensation as a director), (c) has been an employee of, or affiliated with, the Company’s present or former independent auditors, (d) has been part of an interlocking compensation committee of another company that concurrently employs such director, (e) was an executive officer or employee of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which in any single fiscal year exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues, or (f) has an immediate family member who falls within category (a) or (b), who is or was affiliated with or employed in a professional capacity by the Company’s independent auditors, or who is an executive officer of any entity described in category (d) or (e), above.

8. Directors Who Change Their Present Job Responsibility

  Directors are expected to advise the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee promptly upon accepting any other public company directorship or any assignment to the audit committee or compensation committee of the board of directors of any public company of which such Director is a member.

  Directors are expected to report changes in their business or professional affiliations or responsibilities, including retirement, to the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee.

  It is not the sense of the Board that in every instance the Directors who retire or change from the position they held when they came on the Board should necessarily leave the Board. There should, however, be an opportunity for the Board, via the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to review the continued appropriateness of Board membership under these circumstances.

9. Retirement Age

  The Board previously approved a resolution requiring the retirement of any Director who attains the age of 75, and is retired from all business responsibilities for more than five years. The Board continues to believe that this policy is appropriate to maintain a level of business knowledge of each of the Directors.

10. Board Compensation Review

  The Board of Directors or an authorized committee thereof will determine and review the form and amount of director compensation, including cash, equity-based awards and other director compensation. In connection with such director compensation, the Board of Directors will be aware that questions may be raised when directors’ fees and benefits exceed what is customary. Similarly, the Board of Directors will be aware that the independence of directors could be questioned if substantial charitable contributions are made to organizations in which a director is affiliated or if the Company enters into consulting contracts with, or provides other indirect compensation to, a director. The Board of Directors will critically evaluate each of these matters when determining the form and amount of director compensation, and the independence of a director. Notwithstanding above, no member of the Audit Committee may receive compensation from the Company except for fees paid in respect of the service of the Director in his capacity as such.

Performance of Duties by Director

11. Executive Sessions of Outside Directors

  The non-management Directors of the Board will meet in Executive Session at least twice each year to be presided by the Lead Director. The Board of Directors or the Company will establish methods by which interested parties may communicate directly with the presiding director or with the non-management directors of the Board of Directors as a group and cause such methods to be disclosed.

12. Retention of Advisors

  The Board and its several committees shall have the right from time to time, to retain and consult with outside advisors, including legal counsel, to assist the Directors in the performance of their duties, and shall also have the right to establish and approve the fees payable to such advisors and other material terms of their retention.

13. Assessing the Board’s Performance

  The Board of Directors will conduct a self-evaluation annually to determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The full Board of Directors will discuss the evaluation report to determine what, if any, action could improve Board and Board committee performance. The Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Nominating & Governance Committee, as appropriate, shall review these Corporate Governance Guidelines on an annual basis to determinate whether any changes are appropriate.

  This assessment should be of the Board’s contribution as a whole and specifically review areas in which the Board and/or the management believes a better contribution could be made. Its purpose is to increase the effectiveness of the Board, not to target individual Board members.

Board Relationship to Senior Management

14. Regular Attendance of Non-Directors at Board Meetings

  The Board welcomes the regular attendance at each Board meeting of the executive officers of the Company and Board members will have complete access to the Company’s management from time to time as the Board requires to fulfill its obligations.

Meeting Procedures

15. Selection of Agenda Items for Board Meetings

  The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will establish the agenda for each Board meeting and the Chairman of each committee shall set the agenda of the meetings of the applicable committee.

        Each Board member is free to suggest the inclusion of item(s) on the agenda.

16. Board Materials Distributed in Advance

  It is the sense of the Board that information and data that is important to the Board’s understanding of the business be distributed in writing to the Board preferably at least one week before the Board meets. The management will make every attempt to see that this material is as brief as possible while still providing the desired information.

  Directors must disclose to other Directors any potential conflicts of interest they may have with respect to any matter under discussion and, if appropriate, refrain from voting on a matter in which they may have a conflict

Committee Matters

17. Number, Structure and Independence of Committees

  The current Committee structure of the Company is set forth in the Bylaws. There will, from time to time, be occasions in which the Board may want to form a new Committee or disband a current Committee depending upon the circumstances. The current four Committees are Audit, Executive, Compensation and Nominating/Governance. The Committee membership, with the exception of the Executive Committee, will consist only of independent Directors.

18. Assignment and Rotation of Committee Members

  The Nominating/Governance Committee is responsible, after consultation with the Chairman and with consideration of the desires of individual Board members, for the assignment of Board members to various Committees.

  It is the sense of the Board that consideration should be given to rotating Committee members periodically at about a five year interval, but the Board does not feel that such a rotation should be mandated as a policy since there may be reasons at a given point in time to maintain an individual Director’s Committee membership for a longer period.

19. Frequency and Length of Committee Meetings

  The Committee Chairman, in consultation with Committee members, will determine the frequency and length of the meetings of the Committee.

20. Committee Agenda

  The Chairman of the Committee, in consultation with the appropriate members of Management and staff, will develop the Committee’s agenda.

  Each Committee will issue a schedule of agenda subjects to be discussed for the ensuing year at the beginning of each year (to the degree these can be foreseen). This forward agenda will also be shared with the Board.

Leadership Development

21. Formal Evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer

  The independent Directors should make an evaluation annually of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, and it should be communicated to the Chief Executive Officer by the (non-executive) Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director.

  The evaluation should be based for the most part on objective criteria including performance of the business, accomplishment of long-term strategic objectives, development of management, and efforts to build long-term value for the shareholders.

  The evaluation will be used by the Compensation Committee in the course of its deliberations when considering the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer.

22. Succession Planning

  There should be an annual report by the Chairman on succession planning of persons into executive officer positions.

  There should also be available, on a continuing basis, the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation as a successor should he/she be unexpectedly disabled.

23. Management Development

  There should be an annual report to the Board by the Chief Executive Officer on the Company’s program for management development. This report should be given to the Board at the same time as the succession planning report noted previously.

24. Amendment, Modification and Waiver

  These Guidelines may be amended, modified or waived by the Board of Directors and waivers of these Guidelines may also be granted by the Nominating/Governance Committee, subject to the disclosure and other provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the rules promulgated thereunder and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ National Market.

Date:

AMENDED AND RESTATED

By-laws

of

OMEGA FLEX, INC.


ARTICLE I

Shareholders

Section 1.1                                                                   Annual Meeting

        The annual meeting of shareholders shall be scheduled at such time on such day as may be fixed by the Board of Directors, for the purpose of electing directors and for the transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors may in their discretion accelerate or postpone the date and time of the annual meeting of shareholders, irrespective of any prior notice of the date and time of the annual meeting provided to the shareholders, not more than sixty (60) days from the date specified in such prior notice, provided however, that the notice of the accelerated or postponed meeting, as the case may be, shall be given in accordance with Section 1.4 hereof.

Section 1.2                                                                 Special Meetings

        Special meetings of the shareholders may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President or, by a majority of the Directors then in office. A request for a special meeting shall be in writing directed to the secretary of the Corporation and state the purpose or purposes of the proposed meeting. A special meeting of the shareholders may be called for any purpose that may properly come before the shareholders; however, any business transacted at such special meetings shall be confined to the purpose or purposes stated in the written request therefor and notice thereof. Upon written request of any person or person who has duly called a special meeting, the secretary shall fix the time of the meeting which shall be held not more than sixty (60) days after the receipt of the request. If the secretary neglects or refuses to fix the time of the meeting, the person or persons calling the meeting may do so.

Section 1.3                                                                   Place of Meeting

        All meetings of the shareholders shall be held at the principal office of the Corporation or at such other place, within or outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as may be designated by the Board of Directors from time to time. A meeting need not be held at a particular geographic location if it is held by means of electronic communication technology in a fashion that allows shareholders to have the opportunity to read or hear the proceedings substantially concurrent with their occurrence, vote on matters submitted to shareholders, and pose questions to the directors.

Section 1.4                                                                   Notice

        Written notice of every meeting of the shareholders shall be given in any lawful manner by, or at the direction of the secretary or other authorized person or, if he or she neglects or refuses to do so, may be given by the person or persons calling the meeting, to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting, at least five (5) days prior to the day named for the meeting, unless a greater period of notice is required by statute, or by the rules of a national stock exchange on which the Corporation’s shares are listed, in the particular case. The notice of meeting shall specify the place, day and hour of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes of such meeting, and, if applicable, the notice shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the adoption, amendment or repeal of the By-laws; in that case, the notice shall include, or be accompanied by, a copy of the proposed amendment or a summary of the changes to be made by the amendment.

Section 1.5                                                                 Quorum

        A shareholders’ meeting duly called shall not be organized for the transaction of business unless a quorum is present. The presence in person or by proxy of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast on a particular matter to be acted upon at the meeting shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of consideration and action on the matter. The shareholders present at a duly organized meeting may continue to do business until adjournment even though the withdrawal of a number of shareholders from such meeting leaves less than a quorum. If a meeting cannot be organized because a quorum has not attended, those shareholders present may adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at such meeting, until a quorum is present.

Section 1.6                                                                   Organization

        At every meeting of the shareholders, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or in his absence, the President, or in his absence, a person selected by the shareholders, shall act as presiding officer of the meeting, and the secretary, or in his absence, a person selected by the presiding officer of the meeting, shall act as secretary.

Section 1.7                                                                   Action by Shareholders

        Except as otherwise specified herein, or in the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Articles”), or required by law, whenever any corporate action is to be taken by vote of the shareholders, it shall be authorized upon receiving the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all shareholders entitled to vote on the matter, and if any shareholders are entitled to vote on the matter as a class, upon receiving the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote as a class on the matter.

ARTICLE II

Board of Directors

Section 2.1                                                                   General

        All powers vested by law in the Corporation shall be exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed under the direction of, the Board of Directors, except for such powers or authorities that by law or by the Articles are reserved unto the shareholders.

Section 2.2                                                                 Number, Qualifications, Term of Office

        The Board of Directors of the Corporation shall, whenever possible, consist of an odd number of directors numbering not less than (3) and not more than nine (9) directors, the exact number to be set from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Each director shall be a natural person not less than twenty-one (21) years of age but need not be a resident of Pennsylvania or a shareholder of the Corporation. Each director shall hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected and until that director has been re-elected, or until that director’s successor has been elected and qualified, or that director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. A decrease in the number of directors shall not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director.

Section 2.3                                                                   Election

(a)        Directors of the Corporation shall be elected by the shareholders except as provided in Section 2.4 of these By-laws.

(b)        The Board of Directors shall be classified in respect to the time for which the directors shall severally hold office by dividing the directors into three (3) classes, which shall be as nearly equal in number as possible. Each member of each class shall be elected for a term until the third annual shareholders meeting following that member’s taking office and until his or her successor has been selected and qualified or until the member’s earlier death, resignation or removal. The term of office of one class shall expire at the annual meeting of shareholders in each year; except that , for the first two years after the adoption of these Bylaws, the directors of Class I (as designated by the Board) shall hold office until the first annual shareholder meeting following the adoption of these Bylaws, and the directors of Class II (as designated by the Board) shall hold office until the second annual shareholder meeting following the adoption of these Bylaws. At each annual meeting of shareholders, the successors to the directors of the class whose terms expire that year shall be elected and/or reelected to hold office.

Section 2.4                                                                   Vacancies

        Vacancies in the Board of Directors, including vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining members of the Board though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and each person so appointed shall hold office until the next selection of the class for which such director has been chosen and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. When one or more directors resign from the Board effective at a future date, the directors then in office, including those who have resigned, shall have power by the applicable vote to fill the vacancies; the vote will then take effect when the resignations become effective.

Section 2.5                                                                 Nominations

        Nominations for election to the Board of Directors may be made by resolution duly adopted at any meeting of the Board of Directors or a nominating committee of the Board, or by a shareholder holding, or by a group of shareholders who in the aggregate hold, five (5%) percent or more of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least one year prior to the date of the submittal of such candidate. Nominations, other than those made by or on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Corporation or by a nominating committee of the Board, shall be made in writing and shall be received by the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation not later than (i) for an election of directors to be held at an annual meeting of shareholders, one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the annual meeting, and (ii) for an election of directors to be held at a special meeting of shareholders, the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day following the date on which notice of the meeting is first given to shareholders. Such notification shall contain the following information to the extent known to the notifying shareholder: (a) the name and residence address of each proposed nominee and of the notifying shareholder; (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee; (c) any information regarding each nominee proposed by the shareholder that would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (d) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Corporation if elected. If the information submitted to the Corporation within the time prescribed above is determined by the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation to be deficient in any manner, the Chairman shall advise the notifying shareholder in writing of the deficiencies within 15 days of the receipt thereof. The notifying shareholder must then cure such deficiencies by sending a revised notification to the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation, giving the required information that must be received by the Chairman of the Board in writing within the times specified in clauses (i) and (ii), above.

Section 2.6                                                                   Chairman of the Board

        The directors of the Corporation shall elect from their own number a chairman of the Board, who may or may not be an officer of the Corporation. The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders and of the directors and shall have such other powers and duties as are provided in these By-laws and as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors.

Section 2.7                                                                   Regular Meetings

        The Board of Directors shall hold an annual meeting for the election of officers and the transaction of other proper business as soon as practical after, and at the same place as, the annual meeting of shareholders. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at such day, hour and place as may be fixed by the Board, within or outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Section 2.8                                                                   Special Meetings

        Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chairman of the Board or any two (2) directors. The person or persons calling the special meeting may fix the day, hour and place of the meeting, within or outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Section 2.9                                                                   Notice of Meetings

        Written notice, or oral notice with written confirmation no later than the date of the meeting, of each regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors, specifying the place, day and hour of the meeting, shall be given to each director at least forty-eight (48) hours before the time set for the meeting by the secretary of the Corporation, or in the case of any special meetings called pursuant to Section 2.8 of these By-laws, the person or persons calling such special meeting, or their designee. Such written notices may be sent in the manner provided in Section 4.1 hereof. No further notice of any annual meeting of the Board of Directors, other than that provided by Section 2.7 of these By-laws, need be given. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any annual or regular meeting of the Board need be specified in the notice of the meeting. Any notice issued for a special meeting shall state the purpose or purposes of such meeting.

Section 2.10                                                                 Unanimous Written Consent

        Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if, prior or subsequent to the action, all of the directors then in office execute a written consent to such action, which shall be filed by the secretary of the Corporation with the minutes of the Board of Directors.

Section 2.11                                                                   Quorum of and Action by Directors

        A majority of the directors in office shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the acts of a majority of directors present and voting at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the acts of the Board of Directors except where a different vote is required by law or the Articles or these By-laws. Every director shall be entitled to one vote.

Section 2.12                                                                  Committees of the Board

        The Board of Directors may establish, on its own initiative or pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission or of any applicable national stock exchange, one or more committees, each committee to consist of one or more of the directors of the Corporation. The Board may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the committee or for purposes of any written action of the committee. Except in the case of the Audit or Compensation Committees, if any, or other similar committees, in the absence or disqualification of any member or alternate member or members of a committee, the member or members present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, though less than a quorum, may unanimously appoint another director to act at the meeting in the place of the absent or disqualified member. A committee, to the extent provided by the Board of Directors, shall have and may exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board of Directors delegated to it by the Board of Directors, except that a committee shall not have any power or authority as to: (i) the submission to shareholders of any action requiring the approval of shareholders under the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, (ii) the creation or filling of vacancies in the Board of Directors, (iii) the adoption, amendment or repeal of the By-laws, (iv) the amendment, adoption or repeal of any resolution of the Board that by its terms is amendable or repealable only by the Board, or (v) action on matters committed by the By-laws or resolution of the Board to another committee of the Board. Each committee of the Board shall serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Section 2.13                                                                   Standing Committees

        There shall be the following standing committees of the Board:

  Audit Committee — The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include (a) reviewing and evaluating the work and performance of the Corporation’s independent accountants and selection of such independent accountants, (b) conferring with the Corporation’s financial officers and independent accountants and evaluating the Corporation’s internal accounting methods and procedures and to recommend changes in such methods and procedures, (c) reporting on the discussions of the Committee with the Corporation’s financial officers and independent accountants regarding the audited financial statements of the Corporation, and such other matters required by applicable rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission or national stock exchange, (d) making recommendations to the Board whether the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, (e) reviewing and making recommendations on all related party transactions and the Corporation’s conflict of interest policy, (f) directing the tasks of the internal auditor of the Corporation, and (g) reviewing and overseeing the organization and operation of the financial operations of the Corporation.

  Compensation Committee — The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the salary of the Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers of the Corporation and recommending to the Board of Directors the amount of salary to be paid, the bonus formulae and other compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers of the Corporation.

  Executive Committee — To the extent permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Executive Committee has and may exercise all the powers and authorities of the Board of Directors as follows: (a) to take action on behalf of the Board of Directors during intervals between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors if it is impracticable to delay action on a matter until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors, and (b) to take action on all matters of the Corporation that have been delegated for action by the Board of Directors.

  Nominating/Governance Committee — The Nominating/Governance Committee’s responsibilities include (a) evaluating and recommending nominees for election as directors to the Board of Directors, (b) recommending to the Board of Directors criteria for membership on the Board, (c) proposing nominees to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors as they occur and (d) establishing and maintaining a set of corporate governance principles by which the Board and its committees will operate. In proposing candidates for election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting of shareholders, the Nominating Committee may consider prospective candidates whose names have been submitted by shareholders pursuant to Section 2.5.

Section 2.14                                                                   Compensation

        By resolution of the Board of Directors, each director may be paid his or her expenses, if any, of attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or its committee, and may be paid a fixed sum set from time to time by the Board of Directors for serving on the Board of Directors and/or for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or committee or both. No such payment shall prevent any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefore, and a director may be a salaried officer or employee of the Corporation.

Section 2.15                                                                   Limits on Liability

        A director shall not be held personally liable for monetary damages for any action he or she has taken or any failure to take action, unless (a) the director has breached or failed to perform the duties of his office as defined by Pennsylvania law, and (b) the breach or failure to perform constitutes self-dealing, willful misconduct or recklessness. The provision of this Section 2.15, however, shall not apply to (i) the responsibility or liability of a director pursuant to a criminal statute, or (ii) the liability of a director for the payment of taxes pursuant to local, state or federal law.

ARTICLE III

Officers

Section 3.1                                                                  Officers and Qualifications

        The Corporation shall have a president, a secretary, and a treasurer, each of whom shall be elected or appointed by the Board of Directors. The Board may also elect a chief executive officer, one or more vice presidents (including executive vice presidents or senior vice presidents), and any other officers and assistant officers that the Board deems necessary or advisable. All officers must be natural persons not less than twenty-one (21) years of age. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person; however, the offices of president and treasurer; and president and secretary, may not be held by the same person. Officers of the Corporation, as between themselves and the Corporation, shall have the authority and perform such duties in the management of the Corporation as is provided by or according to these By-laws or, in the absence of controlling provisions in these By-laws, as is determined by or according to resolutions or orders of the Board of Directors.

Section 3.2                                                                   Election, Term, and Vacancies

        The officers and assistant officers of the Corporation shall be elected by the Board of Directors at the annual meeting of the Board or appointed from time to time as the Board shall determine. Each officer shall hold office at the pleasure of the Board and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until the officer’s earlier death, resignation or removal. Any officer elected or appointed by the Board of Directors may be removed from such office or offices at any time, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, subject, however, to the express rights of such officer in a written employment contract, if any, between such officer and the Corporation. A vacancy in any office occurring in any manner may be filled by the Board of Directors and, if the office is one for which these By-laws prescribe a term, shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term.

Section 3.3                                                                   Chief Executive Officer

        The chief executive officer shall have general and active management of the business of the Corporation and shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. The chief executive officer has the general powers and duties of supervision and management usually vested in the office of the chief executive officer of a corporation.

Section 3.4                                                                   President

        The president shall have such powers and duties as are provided in these By-laws and as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors.

Section 3.5                                                                   Vice Presidents

    (a)        The seniority of the vice presidents shall be first, the executive vice presidents in order of their election, and second, the senior vice presidents in order of their election. The seniority of the remaining vice presidents shall be in the order of their election.

    (b)        The respective vice presidents, in the order of their seniority, shall, in the absence or disability of the president, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the president; and, shall perform such other duties as the chief executive officer or the Board of Directors shall prescribe.

Section 3.6                                                                   Secretary

        The secretary shall attend all sessions of the Board of Directors and all meetings of the shareholders and record all votes and the minutes of all proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose; and, shall perform like duties for the standing committees when so requested or required. The secretary shall have the custody of, and affix the seal of the Corporation to, such documents as may require attestation. The secretary shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the shareholders, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or the chief executive officer, under whose supervision he shall be.

Section 3.7                                                                 Treasurer

    (a)        The treasurer shall have the custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation, and shall deposit all moneys, and other valuable effects, in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors.

    (b)        The treasurer shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as may be ordered by the Board, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the Chairman of the Board and directors at the regular meetings of the Board of Directors, or whenever they may require it, an account of all his transactions as treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation.

Section 3.8                                                                   Assistant Officers

        Any assistant secretary of the Corporation shall perform the duties of the secretary in the secretary’s absence, and shall perform other duties that the Board of Directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the secretary may from time to time designate. Any assistant treasurer of the Corporation shall perform the duties of the treasurer in the treasurer’s absence, and shall perform other duties that the Board of Directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the treasurer may designate from time to time.

Section 3.9                                                                   Designation of Officers

        In case of the absence of any officer of the Corporation, or for any other reason that the Board may deem sufficient, the Board may delegate, for the time being, the powers, and duties, or any of them, of such officer to any other officer, or to any director, provided that a majority of the directors concur therewith.

ARTICLE IV

Manner of Giving Notice, Waiver of Notice,
Meetings by Electronic Technology and
Modification of Proposals

Section 4.1                                                                   Manner of Giving Notice

        Whenever written notice is required to be given to any person under the provisions of the Business Corporation Law or by the Articles or these By-laws, it may be given to the person either personally or by sending a copy of it: (1) by regular or express mail, postage prepaid; (2) by courier service, charges prepaid; (3) by facsimile transmission or electronic mail, to the shareholder’s mailing address, electronic mail address, or facsimile number appearing on the books of the Corporation, or in the case of directors, supplied by the director to the Corporation for the purpose of notice. Notice sent by mail or by courier service shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States mail or with a courier service for delivery, except that, in the case of directors, notice sent by regular mail shall be deemed to have been given 48 hours after being deposited in the United States mail or, in the case of facsimile or electronic mail, when dispatched.

Section 4.2                                                                   Waiver of Notice

        Whenever any written notice is required to be given by statute or the Articles or these By-laws, a waiver of the notice in writing, signed by the person or persons entitled to the notice, whether before or after the time stated in it, shall be deemed equivalent to the giving of the notice. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, a meeting need be specified in the waiver of notice of the meeting. Attendance of a person, either in person or by proxy, at any meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of the meeting, except where the person attends the meeting for the express purpose of objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the meeting was not lawfully called or convened.

Section 4.3                                                                  Meetings by Means of Conference Telephone or Other Electronic Technology

    (a)        One or more persons may participate in a meeting of the directors, or of any committee of directors, or of the shareholders, by means of conference telephone or electronic technology established by the Company for such purpose so that all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other or apprehend all proceedings of the meeting, and vote on matters submitted to the board, a committee, or the shareholders, and pose questions to the board. Such participation shall constitute presence in person at the meeting.

    (b)        Participation, including voting and taking other action, at a meeting of shareholders or the expression of consent or dissent to corporate action by a shareholder by conference telephone or other electronic means shall constitute the presence of, or vote of, or action by, or consent or dissent of, the shareholder.

Section 4.4                                                                   Modification of Proposals

        Subject to Sections 1.2 and 2.8, whenever the language of a proposed resolution is included in a written notice of a meeting required to be given by statute or by the Articles or the By-laws, the meeting considering the resolution may without further notice adopt it with any clarifying or other amendments that do not enlarge or change its original purpose.

ARTICLE V

Capital Stock, Record Dates, Books & Records

Section 5.1                                                                   Book-Entry Shares and Certificates.

        The Corporation may record the ownership interests of the shareholders through a “book-entry” system, and shall provide or cause to be provided to the shareholders a statement reflecting the ownership interest of each shareholder in the Corporation. A shareholder may receive upon written request to the Corporation or its transfer agent a physical share certificate or certificates representing the shareholder’s shares of the Corporation’s capital stock.

        The certificates of stock of the Corporation as and when issued shall be numbered and shall be entered in the books of the Corporation as they are issued. They shall exhibit the holder’s name and number of shares and par value thereof (if any), and shall bear the signature of the Chairman of the Board, or the president or any executive or senior vice president and the secretary or an assistant secretary or the treasurer or an assistant treasurer. Where the certificates are signed by a transfer agent and a registrar, the signature of any corporate officer thereon may be a facsimile, printed or engraved. The seal of the Corporation may be either impressed upon the certificate or may be an engraved or printed facsimile copy of the seal of the Corporation.

Section 5.2                                                                   Transfers of Stock

        Transfer of stock shall be made only on the stock transfer records of the Corporation (which may be kept in written or computer form). Transfers shall be made by the Corporation or its registrar and transfer agent as required by any applicable law, rule or regulation, and the rules of any national stock exchange on which the Corporation’s shares are listed.

Section 5.3                                                                   Record Dates

        The Board of Directors may fix in advance a date, not exceeding ninety (90) days, preceding the date of any meeting of shareholders, or the date for the payment of any dividend, or the date for allotment of rights, or the date when any change or conversion or exchange of capital stock shall go into effect, as a record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any such meeting, or entitled to receive payment of any such dividend, or to any such allotment of rights, or to exercise the rights in respect of any such change, conversion or exchange of capital stock. In such case, if otherwise entitled, all shareholders of record on the date so fixed, and no others, shall be entitled to notice of, or to vote at, such meeting, or to receive payments of such dividends, or to receive such allotment of rights, or exercise such rights, as the case may be, notwithstanding any transfer of stock on the books of the Corporation after any such record date fixed as aforesaid.

Section 5.4                                                                   Registered Shareholders

        For all purposes, the Corporation shall be entitled to treat the holder of record of any share or shares of stock as the holder in fact thereof, including the right to receive notice of, and to vote at, any meeting of the shareholders, and the right to receive any dividend or distribution with respect to such shares. The Corporation shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to, or interest in, such share or shares on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, save as expressly required by the laws of Pennsylvania.

Section 5.5                                                                   Lost Certificates

        New certificates for shares of stock may be issued to replace certificates, lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated upon such terms and conditions, including the giving of a satisfactory bond or indemnity, as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe by either a special resolution in the particular case or by a resolution conferring on one or more officers general authority in such matters.

Section 5.6                                                                   Inspection of Books

        The Board of Directors shall determine from time to time whether, and, if allowed, when and under what conditions and regulations, the accounts and books of the Corporation (except such as may by law be specifically open to inspection) or any of them shall be open to the inspection of the shareholders, and the shareholders’ rights in this respect are and shall be restricted and limited accordingly.

ARTICLE VI

Indemnification

Section 6.1 Indemnification

        The Corporation may indemnify any person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, whether such person is formally a party thereto or not, by reason of the fact that he or she is, or was, a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as an officer, director, employee or agent of another corporation, company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, to the fullest extent allowed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but subject to the standards set forth in Sections 6.3 and 6.5 below. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that such person is not entitled to indemnification pursuant to this Section 6.1.

Section 6.2                                                                   Indemnification Actions By or On Behalf of the Corporation

        The Corporation shall indemnify any person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the defense or settlement of any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation to procure judgment in its favor, whether such person is formally a party thereto or not, by reason of the fact that he or she is, or was, a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is, or was, serving at the request of the Corporation as an officer, director, employee or agent of another corporation, company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, to the fullest extent allowed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that such person is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 6.2.

Section 6.3                                                                   Limitation on Indemnification Against Liability

        The indemnification described above in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 shall not be applicable if a court determines that: (a) such person has breached or failed to perform his or her duty to the Corporation as defined by Pennsylvania law; and (b) such breach or failure to perform has been determined by a court to constitute willful misconduct or recklessness.

Section 6.4                                                                   Advancement of Expenses

        Expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of a director, officer, employee, or agent to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation.

Section 6.5                                                                   Authorization of Indemnification

        Indemnification under Sections 6.1, 6.2, or 6.4 hereof may be made by the Corporation to the fullest extent allowed by law upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances because he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Such determination may be made (i) by the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, or (ii) if such quorum if not obtainable, or, even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (iii) by the shareholders.

Section 6.5                                                                   Non-exclusive Rights

        The indemnification provided by this Article VI shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled under any agreement, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.

Section 6.6                                                                   Insurance

        The Corporation shall have the power and authority to purchase and maintain insurance, or to provide a mechanism to fund any liability of the Corporation arising out of its obligations under this Article VI, on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of this Article VI.

ARTICLE VII

Loans, Checks and Instruments

Section 7.1                                                                   Borrowings

        No borrowings shall be contracted on behalf of the Corporation unless authorized by the Board of Directors. Such authority may be general or confined to specific instances.

Section 7.2                                                                   Signatures

        All notes, drafts, acceptances, checks, endorsements (other than for deposit), and all other evidences of indebtedness of the Corporation whatsoever, shall be signed by such one or more officers or agents of the Corporation, and subject to such requirements as to countersignature or other conditions, as the Board of Directors shall determine from time to time. Facsimile signatures on checks may be used if and to the extent authorized by the Board of Directors.

Section 7.3                                                                   Authorization

        The Board of Directors may authorize any one or more officers or agents to enter into any other contract or execute and deliver any other instrument in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, and such authority may be general or confined to specific instances.

ARTICLE VIII

Fiscal Year

Section 8.1

        The fiscal year shall begin the first day of January in each year.

ARTICLE IX

Seal

Section 9.1

        The corporate seal of the Corporation, until changed, shall be as impressed on this page, but the Board of Directors shall have the power to alter the same. The Corporation may use the seal by causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or in any manner reproduced.

ARTICLE X

Amendments

Section 10.1

        Subject to Section 10.2, below, these By-laws may be altered, amended, restated and repealed, and new bylaws may be adopted, by (a) the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office at a meeting duly called and validly held for such purpose, or (b) if the applicable provisions of Pennsylvania laws require the approval of the shareholders to any provision of these By-laws as amended, to give effect to such provision, then upon the recommendation of the board, of the adoption of such provision, the By-laws may be altered or amended by the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast on such matter at any shareholders meeting if notice of the proposed changes are contained in the notice of the meeting.

Section 10.2

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.1, above, the provisions of Article II of these By-laws and the provisions of this Section 10.2 may be altered, amended, repealed or restated, and new bylaws may be adopted superseding said provisions, by (a) the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the directors then in office at a meeting duly called and validly held for such purpose, or (b) if the applicable provisions of Pennsylvania laws require the approval of the shareholders to any provision of these By-laws as amended, to give effect to such provision, then upon the recommendation of not less than two-thirds of the directors then in office of the adoption of such provision, Article II of these By-laws or this Section 10.2 may be altered, amended, repealed or restated by the affirmative vote of not less than sixty-seven percent of the votes that all shareholders re entitled to cast on such matter at any shareholders meeting if notice of the proposed changes are contained in the notice of the meeting.

ARTICLE XI

Severability

Section 11.1

The provisions of these By-laws are severable and if any part, sentence, clause or section shall be invalidated by any decision of any court the remaining provisions of these By-laws shall be given full force and effect as completely as if the invalidated part had not been included herein.

INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

        THIS INDEMNITY AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of this ___ day of ________, 2005, by and between Omega Flex, Inc. (the “Company”), a Pennsylvania corporation, and _______________ , (hereinafter referred to as “Indemnitee”).

W I T N E S S E T H

        WHEREAS, Indemnitee is willing to serve the Company if he is assured that his legal expenses and possibly amounts paid in settlements or judgments resulting from his service with the Company will be reimbursed;

        WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee recognize the increasing difficulty in obtaining officers’ and directors’ liability insurance, the significant increases in the cost of such insurance and the general reductions in the coverage of such insurances; and

        WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee further recognize the substantial increase in corporate litigation, in general, subjecting officers to expensive litigation risks at the same time as liability insurance has been severely limited; and

        WHEREAS, Indemnitee does not regard the current protection available as adequate given the present circumstances, and Indemnitee and other directors and/or officers of the Company may not be willing to serve as officers and/or directors without adequate protection; and

        WHEREAS, the Company desires to attract and retain the services of able persons to serve as directors and officers of the Company and to indemnify its directors and officers so as to provide them with the maximum protection permitted by law.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for the mutual benefit of the Company and Indemnitee, the Company and Indemnitee agree as follows:

1.     Indemnification Actions and Proceedings Against Officers and Directors .

        The Company shall indemnify the Indemnitee against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, whether Indemnitee is formally a party thereto or not, by reason of the fact that he is or was an officer or director of the Company or is or was serving at the request of the Company as an officer, director, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, to the fullest extent allowed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification pursuant to this Section 1.

2.     Indemnification Actions By or On Behalf of the Company .

        The Company shall indemnify the Indemnitee against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the Company to procure judgment in its favor, whether Indemnitee is formally a party thereto or not, by reason of the fact that he is, or was, an officer or director of the Company, or is, or was, serving at the request of the Company as an officer, director, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, to the fullest extent allowed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 2.


3.     Limitation on indemnification Against Liability .

        The indemnification described above in Sections 1 and 2 shall not be applicable if a court determines that: (a) Indemnitee has breached or failed to perform his fiduciary duty as defined by Pennsylvania law; and (b) such breach or failure to perform has been determined by a court to constitute willful misconduct or recklessness.

4.      Advancement of Expenses

        Expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the Company in advance of final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf or Indemnitee to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company.

5.     Authorization of Indemnification .

        Indemnification under Sections 1, 2, or 4 of this Agreement may be made by the Company upon a determination that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because Indemnitee has acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interest of the Company, and with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Such determination may be made:

    (a)        by the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding; or

    (b)        if such quorum if not obtainable, or, even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested Directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or

    (c)        by the shareholders.

6.     Indemnification Procedure .

    (a)        Notice to Company . Indemnitee shall, as a condition precedent to his right to be indemnified under this Agreement, give the Company notice in writing as soon as practical of any claim made against Indemnitee for which indemnification will or could be sought under this Agreement. Notice to the Company shall be directed to President, Omega Flex, Inc., 451 Creamery Way, Exton, PA, 19341, (or such other address as the Company shall designate in writing to Indemnitee). Notice shall be deemed received on the third business day after the date postmarked if sent by domestic certified or registered mail, properly addressed; otherwise notice shall be deemed received when such notice shall actually be received by the Company. In addition, Indemnitee shall give the Company such information and cooperation as it may reasonably require and as shall be within Indemnitee’s power.

    (b)        Procedure . Any indemnification and advances provided for in Sections 1, 2 or 4 of this Agreement shall be made no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the written request by Indemnitee. If a claim under this Agreement, under any statute or under any provision of the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws providing for indemnification is not paid in full by the Company within forty-five (45) days after a written request for payment thereof has first been received by the Company, Indemnitee may, but need not at any time thereafter bring an action against the Company to recover the unpaid amount of the claim. It shall be a defense to any such action (other than an action brought to enforce a claim for expenses incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding in advance of its final disposition) that Indemnitee has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under applicable law for the Company to indemnify Indemnitee for the amount claimed. It is the parties’ intention that if the Company contests Indemnitee’s right to indemnification, the question of Indemnitee’s right to indemnification shall be for the court to decide, and the determination by the Company (including its Board of Directors, any committee or subgroup of the Board of Directors, independent legal counsel, of its shareholders) that Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct shall not create a presumption that Indemnitee has or has not met the applicable standard of conduct.

    (c)        Notice to Insurers . If, at the time of the receipt of a notice of a claim pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof, the Company has officers’ and directors’ liability insurance in effect, the Company shall give prompt notice of the commencement of such proceedings to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective policies. The Company shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such insurers to pay, on behalf of the Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such proceeding in accordance with the terms of such policies.

    (d)        Selection of Counsel . In the event the Company shall be obligated under Section 4 hereof to pay the expenses of any proceeding against Indemnitee, the Company, if appropriate, shall be entitled to assume the defense of such proceeding, with counsel approved by Indemnitee, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or conditioned, upon the delivery to Indemnitee of written notice of its election so to do. After delivery of such notice, approval of such counsel by Indemnitee and the retention of such counsel by the Company, the Company will not be liable to Indemnitee under this Agreement for any fees of counsel subsequently incurred by Indemnitee with respect to the same proceeding, provided that (i) Indemnitee shall have the right to employ his counsel in any such proceeding at Indemnitee’s expense; and (ii) if (A) the employment of counsel by Indemnitee has been previously authorized by the Company, (B) Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Company and Indemnitee in the conduct of any such defense, or (C) the Company shall not, in fact, have employed counsel to assume the defense of such proceeding, then the fees and expenses of Indemnitee’s counsel shall be at the expense of the Company.

7.     Indemnification Not Exclusive .

        The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by this Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the Indemnitee may be entitled under any By-Laws, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office.

8.      Mutual Acknowledgments.

        Both the Company and Indemnitee acknowledge that in certain instances, Federal law or public policy may override applicable state law and prohibit the Company from indemnifying its officers and directors under this Agreement or otherwise. For example, the Company and Indemnitee acknowledge that the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has taken the position that indemnification is not permissible for liabilities arising under certain Federal securities laws and Federal legislation prohibits indemnification for certain ERISA violations. Indemnitee understands and acknowledges that the Company has undertaken with the SEC to submit the question of indemnification of the Company’s right under public policy to indemnify Indemnitee.

9.     Severability .

        Nothing in this Agreement is intended to require or shall be construed as requiring the Company to do or fail to do any act in violation of applicable law. The Company’s inability, pursuant to court order, to perform its obligations under this Agreement shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall be severable as provided in this Section 9. If this Agreement or any portion hereof shall be invalidated on any ground by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the Company shall nevertheless indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by any applicable portion of this Agreement that shall not have been invalidated, and the balance of this Agreement not so invalidated shall be enforceable in accordance with its terms.

10.     Mergers and Consolidations .

        For purposes of this section, references to “the Company” shall include, in addition to the resulting corporation, any constituent corporation (including any constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers and employees or agents, so that any person who is, or was, an officer or director of such constituent corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such constituent corporation as an officer, director, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as he would have with respect to such constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued.

11.      Exceptions.

        In addition to the right of the Company to refuse indemnification or advancement of expenses under any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be obligated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement:

    (a)        Claims Initiated by Indemnitee . To indemnify or advance expenses to Indemnitee with respect to proceedings or claims initiated or brought voluntarily by Indemnitee and not by way of defense, except with respect to proceedings brought to establish or enforce a right to indemnification under this Agreement or any other statute or law, but such indemnification or advancement of expenses may be provided by the Company in specific cases if the Board of Directors finds it to be appropriate.

    (b)        Insured Claims . To indemnify Indemnitee for expenses or liabilities of any type whatsoever (including, but not limited to, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties, and amounts paid in settlement) which have been paid directly to Indemnitee by an insurance carrier under a policy of officers’ and directors’ liability insurance maintained by the Company.

    (c)        Claims Under Section 16(b) To indemnify Indemnitee for expenses or the payment of profits arising from the purchase and sale by Indemnitee of securities in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any similar successor statute.

12.     Employment Benefit Plans .

        For purpose of this Agreement, references to “other enterprises” shall include employee benefit plans; references to “fines” shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to any employee benefit plan, and references to “serving at the request of the Company” shall include any service as an officer or director of the Company which imposes duties on, or involves services by, Indemnitee with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants or beneficiaries.

13.     Term Of Indemnity — Prior Agreements .

        This Agreement shall be binding upon the Company and its successors and assigns. This Agreement shall commence as to alleged acts or omissions of the Indemnitee, commencing January 1, 2005, or as soon thereafter as allowable under Pennsylvania law, and shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue after Indemnitee has ceased to be a Indemnitee of the Company and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of Indemnitee. All prior agreements between the Company and Indemnitee shall be deemed to have been replaced by this Agreement as of the date of commencement of the indemnification provided by this Agreement.

14.     Notice .

        All notices, requests, demands and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given (i) if delivered by hand and receipted for by the party addressee, on the date of such receipt, or (ii) if mailed by domestic certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business day after the date postmarked. Addresses for notice to either party are as shown on the signature page of this Agreement, or as subsequently modified by written notice.

15.     Governing Law .

        This Agreement shall be governed by and its provisions construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Indemnity Agreement as of the date first above written.

ATTEST: OMEGA FLEX, INC.
___________________________     By:___________________________  
    Its: __________________________  
    451 Creamery Way  
    Exton, PA 19341  
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:      
_________________________      
Name:      
Address:      

Exhibit 10.4

TAX RESPONSIBILITY ALLOCATION AGREEMENT

        This Tax Responsibility Allocation Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of _____, 2005, between Mestek, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation (“Mestek”), and Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Omega”) either or both of which may be a “party” or “parties”.

        WHEREAS, Mestek owned 86% of the common stock of Omega;

        WHEREAS, the board of directors of Mestek has determined it would be in the best interests of Mestek and its shareholders to distribute all of Mestek’s shares in Omega to the Mestek shareholders (the “Distribution”) on the terms and conditions set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated _______, 2005 between Mestek and Omega (the “Distribution Agreement”) (the date of such Distribution, the “Distribution Date”);

        WHEREAS, the parties intend that the Distribution qualify as a tax-free spin-off pursuant to Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”);

        WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, Mestek is the common parent of an affiliated group of domestic corporations, including Omega, which has elected to file consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns and, as a result of the Distribution, Omega will not be a member of such group for the portion of the taxable year following the Distribution or in future taxable years;

        WHEREAS, the parties desire (i) to allocate the responsibilities for Income Tax (as hereinafter defined) of Omega, (ii) to allocate the responsibilities for Other Omega Tax (as hereinafter defined) and (iii) to provide for certain additional Tax (as hereinafter defined) matters;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties (each on behalf of itself, each of its subsidiaries as of the Distribution Date, and its future subsidiaries) hereby agree as follows:

1.     Definitions . The following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to apply equally to both the singular and the plural forms of the terms defined). All section references are to this Agreement unless otherwise stated.

    “Omega Business” means any businesses carried out by the Omega Group, now or in the past.


    “Omega Combined Income Tax” shall mean, with respect to any period for which the Omega Group is included in any of Mestek’s combined or unitary groups, the liability for state or local Income Tax of the Omega Group computed as though the Omega Group filed a Tax Return separate from Mestek for such taxable period, which amount shall not be less than zero.


    “Omega Federal Income Tax” shall mean, with respect to any period for which the Omega Group is included in Mestek’s consolidated group, the liability for U.S. federal Income Tax (including “alternative minimum tax”, if any) of the Omega Group computed as though the Omega Group filed a U.S. federal Income Tax Return separate from Mestek for such taxable period, which amount shall not be less than zero.


    “Omega Group” shall mean, collectively or separately, Omega and any Subsidiary of Omega for which Omega has any direct or indirect Tax liability.


    “Omega State Income Tax” shall mean any state or local Income Tax imposed on any member of the Omega Group (which is not a Omega Combined Income Tax).


    “Mestek Group” shall mean, collectively or separately, Mestek and any Subsidiary of Mestek for which Mestek has any direct or indirect Tax liability, other than any member of the Omega Group.


    “Income Tax” shall mean any tax imposed on net income, including the Michigan Single Business Tax.


    “Other Omega Tax” means any Tax of the Omega Group or with respect to the Omega Business that is not an Income Tax (whether payable directly by Omega Group or payable by a combined or unitary group that includes the Omega Group to the extent of Omega Group’s portion of such Tax).


    “Post-Distribution Period” means all taxable periods or portions of periods beginning on or after the Distribution Date.


    “Pre-Distribution Period” means all taxable periods or portions of periods ending before the Distribution Date.


    “Subsidiary”means any corporation, company, partnership or other business organization of which 50% or more of its equity interests are owned by another corporation, company, partnership or other business organization.


    “Tax”means any income, gross income, gross receipts, profits, capital stock, franchise, withholding, payroll, social security, workers compensation, unemployment, disability, property, ad valorem, stamp, excise, severance, occupation, service, sales, use, license, lease, transfer, import, export, value added, alternative minimum, estimated or other similar tax (including any fee, assessment, or other charge in the nature of or in lieu of any tax) imposed by any governmental entity or political subdivision thereof, and any interest, penalties, additions to tax, or additional amounts in respect of the foregoing imposed on any taxpayer or consolidated, combined or unitary group of taxpayers.


    “Tax Authority” means, with respect to any Tax, the governmental entity or political subdivision thereof that imposes such Tax, and the agency (if any) charged with the collection of such Tax for such entity or subdivision.


    “Tax Benefit” means the amount that any item of loss, deduction or credit (or any other item) decreases Taxes paid or payable including any interest with respect thereto or interest that would have been payable but for such item, net of any Tax imposed on such interest.


    “Tax Contest” means an audit, review, examination, or any other administrative or judicial proceeding with the purpose or effect of re-determining any Tax (including any administrative or judicial review of any claim for refund).


    “Tax Detriment” means the amount that any item of income or gain (or any other item) increases Taxes paid or payable including any interest with respect thereto.


    “Tax Return” means any report of Tax due, any claims for refund of Tax paid, any information return with respect to Tax, any election made with respect to Tax, or any other similar report, statement, declaration, or document required to be filed under the Code or other law in respect of Tax, including any attachments, exhibits, or other materials submitted with any of the foregoing, and including any amendments or supplements to any of the foregoing for any taxpayer or consolidated, combined or unitary group of taxpayers.


    2.         Responsibility for Tax

    2.1         Mestek’s Responsibility


    (a)               Mestek shall be responsible for and indemnify and hold harmless the Omega Group from (i) any liability for Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax with respect to the Pre-Distribution Period (other than Income Taxes described in Section 2.2(b); (ii) any Income Tax of the Mestek Group by reason of Omega Group being severally liable for such Income Tax pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.1502-6 or any analogous provision of state or local law; and (iii) any item described in Section 3.1 to the extent not covered by Section 3.2.


    (b)               Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (i) of Section 2.1(a), for all periods in which Omega is a member of Mestek’s consolidated group, Omega shall be responsible for and shall pay to Mestek, on or prior to the Distribution Date, an amount equal to the estimate of the Omega Federal Income Tax for such periods, as determined by Mestek in good faith and in the ordinary course of business, subject to final determination of such amount as provided in Section 2.5(a).


    (c)               Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (i) of Section 2.1(a), for all periods in which Omega or any other member of the Omega Group is a member of a state or local consolidated, combined or unitary group of which any member of the Mestek Group is the parent, Omega shall be responsible for and shall pay to Mestek, on or prior to the Distribution Date, an amount equal to the estimate of the Omega Combined Income Tax for such periods, as determined by Mestek in good faith and in the ordinary course of business, subject to final determination of such amount as provided in Section 2.5(a).


    2.2         Omega’s Responsibility


    (a)               Omega shall be responsible for, and indemnify and hold harmless the Mestek Group from (i) all Income Tax of the Omega Group with respect to a Post-Distribution Period; (ii) Income Taxes described in Section 2.2(b); (iii) all Other Omega Tax (regardless of which period it relates to); and (iv) any act for which Omega is liable under Section 3.2.


    (b)               In the event that any jurisdiction determines that the income of any member of the Omega Group is included or includible with the income of any member of the Mestek Group for purposes of calculating the combined, consolidated, or unitary Tax liability of the Mestek Group and, as of the date hereof, the income of such member of the Omega Group was not so included by any member of the Mestek Group in a combined, consolidated, or unitary group of which such member of the Mestek Group was the common parent, Omega shall be responsible for and shall pay to Mestek any Income Tax liability incurred by any member of the Mestek Group as a result of such determination.


    2.3         General Responsibilities . For purposes of this Agreement, in the case of any taxable period that begins before and ends after the Distribution Date, the amount of Omega Federal Income Tax and/or Omega Combined Income Tax payable for such taxable period shall be allocated pro rata between the time period before the Distribution Date and the time period after the Distribution Date, as of each such time period.


    2.4         Refunds and Tax Benefits


    (a)               Refunds and Carry backs . (i) Except as provided in (ii) or (iii) below, Mestek shall be entitled to any refunds of Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax (including refunds paid by means of a credit against other or future Tax liabilities) arising with respect to taxable periods ending on or before the Distribution Date; and Omega shall be entitled to any refunds of Income Tax of the Omega Group (including refunds paid by means of a credit against other or future Tax liabilities) arising with respect to taxable periods beginning on or after the Distribution Date. Mestek and Omega agree to allocate such refunds (including refunds paid by means of a credit against other or future Tax liabilities) arising with respect to taxable periods that begin before and end after the Distribution Date to whichever of Mestek or Omega initially accrued or recorded a liability for the Taxes to which such refund is attributable.


    (ii)               Omega shall be entitled to any refunds or credits of Omega State Income Tax or Other Omega Tax (including refunds paid by means of a credit against other or future Tax liabilities).


    (iii)               Omega shall promptly forward to Mestek or reimburse Mestek for any refunds due Mestek after receipt thereof, and Mestek shall promptly forward to Omega or reimburse Omega for any refunds due Omega after receipt thereof . In the case of a refund received in the form of a credit against other or future Tax liabilities, reimbursement in respect of such refund shall be due in each case on the due date for payment of the Tax against which such refund has been credited. If Mestek reasonably so requests, Omega, at Mestek’s expense, shall file for and pursue any refund to which Mestek is entitled under this Section 2.4(a). If Omega reasonably so requests, Mestek, at Omega’s expense, shall file for and pursue any refund to which Omega is entitled to under this Section 2.4(a).


    (iv)               Mestek agrees that if the Omega Group carries back any item of loss, deduction or credit which arises in any taxable period the Income Tax for which Omega is responsible, into any taxable period the Income Tax for which Mestek was responsible, then Omega shall be entitled to any Tax Benefit or refund of Tax realized as a result of the carry back.


    (v)               Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 2.4, Mestek shall not be entitled to, and Omega shall be entitled to, any refunds or credits with respect to Income Tax for which Omega was liable under Section 2.2(b).


    (b)               Allocation of Benefits . If as a result of or in settlement of any Tax Contest, any adjustments shall be made to any Tax Returns relating to Income Tax of the Omega Group or the Mestek Group for any period in which one of the parties was responsible for all or a portion of such Income Tax, and if such adjustment results in both Tax Detriment to one party or its subsidiaries and Tax Benefit to the other party, then the party receiving the Tax Benefit shall pay to the party subject to the Tax Detriment the amount of such Tax Benefit at such time or times as and to the extent that the party receiving the Tax Benefit realizes such benefit through a refund of Tax or reduction in the amount of Tax which would otherwise be paid if such adjustment had not been made.


    2.5         Preparation of Tax Returns: Payment of Tax


    (a)               Mestek shall cause the Omega Group to join, for any Pre-Distribution Period for which the Omega Group is required to do so (and may cause the Omega Group (or any member thereof) to join for any such period or Tax Return for which the Omega Group is eligible but not required to do so), in all federal, state or local consolidated, combined or unitary Income Tax Returns of Mestek’s filing group. Mestek shall prepare and timely file all such federal, state or local consolidated, combined or unitary Tax Returns and shall timely pay subject to 7.1(b) and (c) all Tax with respect to such Tax Returns. Mestek shall provide to Omega a copy of the portion of each such Tax Return and any supporting schedules that relate to the Omega Group within 20 days after the filing thereof. No later than December 31 (or as close as reasonably practicable thereto) of the year in which Mestek’s federal Income Tax Return with respect to such Tax is filed, Mestek shall provide to Omega a statement of the Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax for such period, as determined by Mestek in good faith and in the ordinary course of business based upon such Tax Returns. If (x) the sum of the estimates of such Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax as paid by Omega pursuant to Section 2.1(b) and (c) above is less than (y) the sum of the Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax as determined under this Section 2.5(a), Omega shall pay to Mestek the difference between (x) and (y). If (x) the sum of the estimates of such Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax as paid by Omega pursuant to Section 2.1(b) and (c) above is more than (y) the sum of the Omega Federal Income Tax and Omega Combined Income Tax as determined under this Section 2.5(a), Mestek shall pay to Omega the difference between (x) and (y).


    (b)               Mestek shall prepare (or cause to be prepared), at Omega’s expense (or where appropriate through the utilization of Omega’s staff), and Omega shall timely file (or cause to be timely filed) any Tax Return relating to Omega State Income Tax for any period that begins before the Distribution Date (or any portion of such a Tax Return which relates to the Pre-Distribution Period) whether it is required to be filed before or after the Distribution Date. Mestek shall provide a copy of each such Tax Return (or portion thereof) and any supporting schedules to Omega at least 30 days before the date such Return is to be filed by Omega for Omega’s review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Omega shall pay all Tax with respect to such Tax Return for which it is responsible pursuant to Section 2.1. Mestek shall pay to Omega at least 5 days prior to the filing of such Tax Return any amount due on such Tax Return that is the responsibility of Mestek pursuant to Section 2.1.


    (c)               Omega shall be responsible for the preparation and filing of Tax Returns relating to Other Omega Tax. Omega shall pay all Tax with respect to any such Tax Returns.


    (d)               Omega shall not file (or allow the Omega Group to file) any amended Tax Returns with respect to the Omega Group for any Pre-Distribution Period without Mestek’s consent.


    2.6         Cooperation and Exchange of Information . Mestek on the one hand, and Omega, on the other, will timely and competently provide each other with such cooperation and information as either of them reasonably may request of the other in (i) filing any Tax Return, amended return or claim for refund, (ii) determining a liability for Tax or a right to a refund of Tax or (iii) participating in or conducting any audit or other proceeding in respect of Tax. Such cooperation and information shall include providing copies of relevant Tax Returns or portions thereof, together with accompanying schedules and related work papers and documents relating to rulings or other determinations by any Tax Authorities. Each party shall devote the personnel and resources necessary in order to carry out this Section 2.6 and shall make its employees available on a mutually convenient basis to provide explanations of any documents or information provided hereunder. Except as provided below, each party shall carry out their responsibilities under this Section 2.6 without charge to the other. Any information obtained under this Section 2.6 shall be subject to the Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreement of even date herewith between the parties, except as may be otherwise necessary in connection with the filing of Tax Returns or claims for refund or in conducting an audit or other proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Omega shall reimburse Mestek for any out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred with respect to matters concerning Omega State Income Tax for the Pre-Distribution Period. It is further understood that in order to reduce the cost to Omega in connection with Omega State Income Tax matters, to the extent appropriate, Mestek shall utilize and Omega shall provide, members of Omega’s staff.


    2.7         Tax Contests


    (a)               Notice . Each of the parties shall provide prompt notice to the other party of any pending or threatened Tax audit, assessment or proceeding or other Tax Contest of which it becomes aware related to Tax for which it is indemnified by the other party hereunder. Such notice shall contain factual information (to the extent known) describing any asserted Tax liability in reasonable detail and shall be accompanied by copies of any notice and other documents received from any Tax Authority in respect of any such matters. If an indemnified party has knowledge of an asserted Tax liability with respect to a matter for which it is to be indemnified hereunder and such party fails to give the indemnifying party prompt notice of such asserted Tax liability, then (i) if the indemnifying party is precluded from contesting the asserted Tax liability in any forum as a result of the failure to give prompt notice, the indemnifying party shall have no obligation to indemnify the indemnified party for any Tax arising out of such asserted Tax liability, and (ii) if the indemnifying party is not precluded from contesting the asserted Tax liability in any forum, but such failure to give prompt notice results in a monetary detriment to the indemnifying party, then any amount which the indemnifying party is otherwise required to pay the indemnified party pursuant to this Agreement shall be reduced by the amount of such detriment.


    (b)               Control of Tax Contests . Each party shall have full responsibility and discretion in handling, settling or contesting any Tax Contest involving a Tax for which it is liable pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement; provided, however, Mestek shall have full responsibility and discretion in handling, settling or contesting any Tax Contest with respect to a consolidated, combined or unitary federal or state Income Tax of which Mestek or a Mestek Subsidiary is the common parent. In the event that Mestek controls (pursuant to the proviso in the previous sentence) any Tax Contest which gives rise to a Omega indemnification obligation hereunder, Mestek shall consult with Omega with respect to such Tax Contest (to the extent such Tax Contest relates to issues for which Omega is liable) and shall consider in good faith Omega’s advice with respect thereto. Furthermore Mestek may participate in any Tax Contest with respect to any Covered Transaction Tax (as hereinafter defined), and Omega shall consider in good faith Mestek’s advice with respect thereto, regardless of whether Mestek has liability or indemnification obligations with respect to such Tax under this Agreement.


    3.        Transaction Tax

    3.1         General . Except as otherwise provided in Section 3.2, Mestek shall be responsible for and pay any and all Tax resulting from income or gain recognized by Mestek as a result of the Distribution failing to qualify for or maintain tax-free treatment pursuant to Section 355 of the Code or other provisions of the Code or corresponding provisions of other applicable Tax laws, and any Tax resulting from any income or gain recognized by Mestek or its Subsidiaries (including the Omega Group) under Treasury Regulations Sections 1.1502-13 or 1.1502-19 (or any corresponding provisions of other applicable Tax laws) as a result of the Distribution (collectively “Covered Transaction Tax”).


    3.2         Inconsistent Acts and Events . Omega shall be liable for, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Mestek Group from and against any liability for, any Covered Transactions Tax (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith) to the extent arising from (i) any breach by the Omega Group of the representations or covenants under Section 4, (ii) any Tainting Act (as hereinafter defined) performed by the Omega Group (whether or not Section 4.2(c) is complied with) and (iii) any Section 355(e) Event with respect to Omega (whether or not such event is caused by a Tainting Act). A “Section 355(e) Event” with respect to Omega means any fact, circumstance, event or occurrence relating to the stock of Omega or assets of the Omega Group, that causes the Distribution to be a taxable event to Mestek as the result of the application of Section 355(e) of the Code (i.e., the Distribution becomes taxable to Mestek under Section 355(e) and, but for such fact, circumstance, event or occurrence, the Distribution would not have been a taxable event to Mestek under Section 355(e)).


    4.         Representations and Covenants

    4.1         Representations


    (a)               Each of Omega and Mestek represent that, as of the date of this Agreement, it and its Subsidiaries knows of no fact or set of facts that would jeopardize the expected Tax treatment of the Distribution.


    (b)               Each of Omega and Mestek represent and warrant that neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has any plan or intent to take any action which is inconsistent with the expected Tax treatment of the Distribution.


    4.2         Covenants


    (a)               Omega covenants and agrees that it will not take any action, and it will cause its Subsidiaries to refrain from taking any action, which is inconsistent with the Tax-free treatment of the Distribution (any such action, including any action referred to in clause (i) through (iii), is referred to in this Agreement as a “Tainting Act”). Without limiting the foregoing:


    (i)               Specified Actions . During the two year period following the Distribution Date, Omega will not (and it will cause its Subsidiaries not to) (A) liquidate, merge or consolidate with or into any other corporation, company, partnership or other business organization; (B) issue any of its capital stock in one or more transactions, other than, with respect to (1) the exercise of options that are granted by Omega before the Closing Date, or with respect to the exercise of options that are granted by Omega on or after the Closing Date, that satisfy the requirements of Treasury Regulations Section 1.355-7T(d)(6) to not be treated for purposes of Section 355(e) of the Code to be part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Distribution, or (2) issuances of stock to a retirement plan qualified under Section 401(a) or 403(a) of the Code in a transaction which satisfies the requirements of Treasury Regulations Section 1.355-7T(d)(7); (C) redeem, purchase or otherwise reacquire its capital stock in one or more transactions; (D) change the voting rights of any of its stock; (E) sell, exchange, distribute or otherwise dispose of, other than in the ordinary course of business, all or a substantial part of the assets of any of the trades or businesses relied upon to satisfy Section 355(b) of the Code; (F) issue any options to acquire Omega Shares other than options which satisfy the requirements of Treasury Regulations Section 1.355-7T(e)(3)(ii); or (G) discontinue or cause to be discontinued the active conduct of any of the trades or businesses relied upon to satisfy Section 355(b) of the Code.


    (ii)               No Inconsistent Actions . Regardless of any change in circumstances, Omega covenants and agrees that it will not take any action (and it will cause its Subsidiaries to refrain from taking any action) which is inconsistent with any factual statements or representations upon which the tax opinion letter of Greenberg Traurig dated _______, 2005 was based on or before the second anniversary of the Distribution Date other than as permitted in this Section 4. For this purpose, an action is considered inconsistent with a representation if the representation states that there is no plan or intention to take such action.


    (iii)               355(e) Covenant . Without in any manner limiting paragraphs (i) or (ii) immediately above, Omega covenants and agrees that, through the second anniversary of the Distribution Date, it will not enter into (and it will cause its Subsidiaries to refrain from entering into) any agreements, understandings, arrangements or substantial negotiations with respect to transactions or events (including stock issuances, option grants, capital contributions, acquisitions, or changes in the voting power of any of its stock), which may cause the Distribution to be treated as part of a plan pursuant to which one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly Omega stock representing a “50 percent or greater interest” within the meaning of Section 355(e)(4) of the Code.


    (b)               Consistent Tax Returns . Each of Mestek and Omega covenants and agrees that it will not take, and it will cause its Subsidiaries to refrain from taking, any position on a Tax Return that is inconsistent with the treatment of the Distribution as tax-free pursuant to Code Section 355.


    (c)               Exceptions . Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mestek may consent in its sole and absolute discretion to certain actions proposed by Omega to be taken after the Distribution Date that may be inconsistent with Section 4.2(a) if Omega provides a written request to Mestek for its plans with respect to such action, and promptly responds to any inquiries by Mestek following such notification, and Omega obtains an unqualified opinion acceptable to Mestek of an independent nationally recognized tax counsel acceptable to Mestek, on the basis of facts and representations consistent with the facts at the time of such action, that such action will not affect the Tax treatment of the Distribution.


    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Omega shall be liable for, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Mestek from any Covered Transaction Tax resulting from a Tainting Act by Omega or its Subsidiaries, regardless of whether the exception of this Section 4.2(c) is satisfied with respect to such act.


    5.         Miscellaneous Provisions

    5.1         Notice . Any payment, notice or communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing (including facsimile) and mailed, faxed or delivered to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other address as one party may specify by notice to the other party):


     if to Mestek:


Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm Street
Westfield, MA 01085
Attention: President
Fax: (413) 568-7428


     if to Omega:

Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery Way
Exton, PA 19341
Attention: President
Fax: (610) 524-7282


    Notification of a change of address shall be given by either party to the other as provided in this Section 5.1. All such notices and communications shall be effective (i) when received, if mailed or delivered, or (ii) when confirmed by fax answerback, if faxed.


    5.2         Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by the laws applicable to contracts entered into and to be performed within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania excluding its conflict laws.


    5.3         Dispute Resolution . Any and all disputes between Mestek and Omega arising out of any provision of this Agreement shall be resolved pursuant to Section _____ of the Distribution Agreement.


    5.4         Entire Agreement . This Agreement and the Distribution Agreement embodies the entire understanding between the parties relating to its subject matter and supersedes and terminates all prior agreements and understandings among the parties with respect to such matters. No promises, covenants or representations of any kind, other than those expressly stated herein, have been made to induce any party to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be modified or terminated except by a writing duly signed by each of the parties hereto, and no waiver of any provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless in a writing duly signed by the party sought to be bound. If, and to the extent, the provisions of this Agreement conflict with the Distribution Agreement, or any other agreement entered into in connection with the Distribution, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.


    5.5         Assignment; Binding Effect . Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or in part, by operation of law or otherwise by any of the parties without the prior written consent of the other party; provided, however, that no such consent shall be required in the event of a merger, consolidation or sale of either Mestek or Omega. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.


    5.6         Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same.


    5.7         Severability . If any provision of this Agreement or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof.


    5.8         Headings . Headings of sections in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.


    5.9         Survival . Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the provisions of this Agreement shall survive for thirty days after the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations (giving effect to any waiver, mitigation or extension thereof).


    5.10         Payments . Unless a provision in this Agreement specifically provides a time period for payment, any payment owed under this Agreement shall be paid within 30 days after the date on which such payment becomes due.


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Tax Responsibility Allocation Agreement to be executed by its respective duly authorized officer as of the date first set forth above.

MESTEK, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

OMEGA FLEX, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS
BETWEEN OMEGA FLEX, INC.
AND ITS OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS


John E. Reed   May 12, 2005  
Stewart B. Reed   May 12, 2005  
Kevin R. Hoben   May 12, 2005  
Mark F. Albino   May 12, 2005  
Lawrence J. Cianciolo   May 12, 2005  
David K. Evans   May 12, 2005  
David W. Hunter   May 12, 2005  
Bruce C. Klink   May 12, 2005  
Edward J. Trainor   May 12, 2005  
E. Lynn Wilkinson   May 12, 2005  

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE MATTERS AGREEMENT

        THIS INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE MATTERS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of __________, 2005, by and between Mestek, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Mestek”), and Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Omega”). Certain capitalized terms used herein are defined in Article VI. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Distribution Agreement (defined below).

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the Mestek Board of Directors has determined that it is appropriate and desirable for Mestek to distribute its shares of the common stock of Omega on a pro rata basis to the holders of Mestek common stock (the “Distribution”) as of June 23, 2005; and

        WHEREAS, Mestek intends to make the Distribution as of 11:59 P.M. Eastern time, _________, 2005, or such other date as may be fixed by the Mestek Board of Directors (the “Distribution Date”).

        WHEREAS, as part of the foregoing, Mestek and Omega have entered into the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of __________, 2005 (the “Distribution Agreement”), which provides, among other things, the pro-rata distribution by Mestek of all of its shares of Omega common stock to the holders of Mestek common stock, and the execution and delivery of certain other agreements in order to facilitate and provide for the foregoing; and

        WHEREAS, in connection therewith, the parties desire to set forth certain agreements regarding indemnification and insurance.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    1.         Indemnification

    1.1         Indemnification by Omega.


    (a)               Indemnification . Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Omega shall, for itself and for each of its subsidiaries, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Mestek Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities that any third party seeks to impose upon any of the Mestek Indemnitees, or which are imposed upon any of the Mestek Indemnitees, if and to the extent such Liabilities relate to, arise out of or result from any of the following items (without duplication):


    (i)        any breach by Omega or any of its subsidiaries (“Omega Group”) of the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (including this Agreement);


    (ii)        any Omega Liability, or


    (iii)       any Tax claimed, levied or assessed by any government authority against, or paid by, the Mestek Group (defined below) arising from or relating to [ ALT-1 the issuance by Omega of shares of its common stock after the Distribution, or the consummation by Omega after the Distribution of any transaction or series of transactions, and in either case pursuant to which one or more persons who are not Omega shareholders, directly or indirectly, as of the Distribution Date, acquire, directly or indirectly, shares of Omega common stock representing 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding Omega common stock.] [ ALT-2 Any action or series of actions by Omega that cause the Distribution not to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.]


    (b)               Reduction of Liability . In the event that any member of the Omega Group makes a payment to any Mestek Indemnitee hereunder, and the amount of Liabilities paid or the direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by Mestek for the Indemnitee are subsequently recovered by the Mestek Indemnitee, either directly or through a third-party recovery (other than as a result of a recovery under an insurance policy owned by Mestek and under which Omega is not an insured or an additional insured, Mestek will promptly repay (or will procure the relevant Mestek Indemnitee promptly to repay) such member of the Omega Group the amount by which the payment made by such member of the Omega Group exceeds the amount of the Liabilities actually paid by the Mestek Indemnitee.


    (c)               Joint and Several Liability; No Modification to Other Agreements . The liability of the members of the Omega Group under this Section 1.1 shall be joint and several. Nothing in this Section 1.1 shall modify or limit the rights and remedies of Mestek under the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (other than this Agreement) relating to, arising out of or resulting from any breach by Omega or any member of the Omega Group of the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (other than this Agreement), including without limitation, any provisions relating to the measure of damages, consequential damages, liquidated damages, limitation of damages and/or specific performance.


    1.2        Indemnification by Mestek.


    (a)               Indemnification . Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Mestek shall, for itself and its subsidiaries excluding the Omega Group, (the “Mestek Group”), indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Omega Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities that any third party seeks to impose upon any of the Omega Indemnitees, or which are imposed upon any of the Omega Indemnitees, if and to the extent such Liabilities relate to, arise out of or result from (without duplication):


    (i)               any breach by Mestek or any member of the Mestek Group of the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (including this Agreement); or


     (ii)        any Mestek Liability;


    provided,        however, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in no event shall Mestek or any member of the Mestek Group be obligated to indemnify, defend or hold harmless the Omega Indemnitees from, against or in respect of any Omega Liability.


    (b)               Reduction of Liability . In the event that any member of the Mestek Group makes a payment to any Omega Indemnitee hereunder, and the amount paid or the direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Omega Indemnitee for the Liabilities on account of which such payment was made are subsequently recovered by the Omega Indemnitee, either directly or through a third-party recovery, Omega will promptly repay (or will procure an Omega Indemnitee to promptly repay) such member of the Mestek Group the amount by which the payment made by such member of the Mestek Group exceeds the amount of the Liabilities actually paid by the Omega Indemnitee.


    (c)               Joint and Several Liability; No Modification to Other Agreements . The liability of the members of the Mestek Group under this Section 1.2 shall be joint and several. Nothing in this Section 1.2 shall modify or limit the rights and remedies of Omega under the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (other than this Agreement) relating to, arising out of or resulting from any breach by Mestek or any member of the Mestek Group of the Distribution Agreement or any of the Ancillary Agreements (other than this Agreement), including without limitation, any provisions relating to the measure of damages, consequential damages, liquidated damages, limitation of damages and/or specific performance.


    1.3         Procedures for Defense , Settlement and Indemnification of Third Party Claims .


    (a)               Notice of Claims . If an Indemnitee shall receive notice or otherwise learn of the assertion of any Third Party Claim with respect to which a party may be obligated to provide indemnification to such Indemnitee pursuant to Section 1.1 or 1.2, Mestek or Omega (as applicable) shall ensure that such Indemnitee shall give the potential Indemnifying Party written notice thereof (including any pleadings relating thereto) within twenty (20) days after becoming aware of such Third Party Claim. Any such notice shall describe the Third Party Claim in reasonable detail. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any delay or failure of any Indemnitee to give notice as provided in this Section 1.3(a) shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its obligations under this Article 1, except to the extent that the Indemnifying Party is actually and substantially prejudiced by such delay or failure to give notice.


    (b)               Defense by Indemnifying Party . For any Third Party Claim concerning which notice is required to be given under Section 1.3(a), the Indemnifying Party may elect to defend and, subject to Section 1.3(f), may settle or compromise the Third Party Claim using counsel appointed by the Indemnifying Party, which counsel shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnitee. An Indemnifying Party electing to defend a Third Party Claim must notify the Indemnitee of its election to defend within twenty (20) days of receipt of notice of such claim pursuant to Section 1.3(a) or sooner if the nature of the Third Party Claim so requires.


    (c)               Defense by Mestek . Notwithstanding Section 1.3(b), Mestek, in its sole discretion, upon written notice to Omega, may elect to defend (or may at any time assume the defense of) and, subject to Section 1.3(f), may settle or compromise, any Third Party Claim or series of related Third Party Claims, regardless of whether Mestek is obligated to indemnify any member of the Omega Group in respect of such Third Party Claim or series of related Third Party Claims or whether Mestek acknowledges any obligation to indemnify any Omega Indemnitee if:


    (i)               any member of the Mestek Group is named as a party to any of such Third Party Claims; or


    (ii)               both Mestek and Omega may be Indemnifying Parties with respect to such Third Party Claim(s).


  If Mestek elects to defend against a Third Party Claim pursuant to this Section 1.3(c) all costs and expenses incurred by members of the Mestek Group in connection with such defense shall be paid by Mestek and Omega pro rata based on their respective proportionate liability for any Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from such Third Party Claim (after taking into account the parties’ respective indemnification obligations under this Agreement, other than with respect to payment of defense costs). If the parties proportionate liability for any such liabilities cannot be determined at any point in time while a Third Party Claim is pending, then Mestek and Omega shall each pay one-half of such costs and expenses, and the parties may subsequently reallocate all prior costs and expenses paid when the parties’ proportionate liability is finally determined.

    (d)               Defense By Non-Electing Party . If the party having the right to elect to defend a Third Party Claim pursuant to Section 1.3(b) or 1.3(c) elects not to defend, or does not within any time frame required thereunder elect to defend, a particular claim, the other party shall defend such Third Party Claim. In such case, (i) the other party shall have the right, subject to Sections 1.3(c) and 1.3(f) to compromise, settle or consent to the entry of any judgment with respect to such Third Party Claim (but such compromise, settlement or judgment shall not necessarily be determinative of which party hereunder is entitled to indemnification) and (ii) the Indemnifying Party shall bear all costs and expenses of defending such Third Party Claim; provided, however, that if both parties may be Indemnifying Parties with respect to such Third Party Claim, the Non-Defending Party (defined below) shall reimburse the Defending Party for the Non-Defending Party’s pro rata share of all costs and expenses incurred by the Defending Party in connection with its defense of such Third Party Claim, based on the Non-Defending Party’s proportionate liability for any Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from such Third Party Claim (after taking into account the parties’ indemnification obligations under this Agreement, other than with respect to payment of defense costs). If the parties proportionate liability for any such liabilities cannot be determined at any point in time while a Third Party Claim is pending, then Mestek and Omega shall each pay one-half of such costs and expenses, and the parties may subsequently reallocate all prior costs and expenses paid when the parties’ proportionate liability is finally determined.


    (e)               Participation by Non-Defending Party . In the event that a party (a “Defending Party”) elects or is required to defend a particular Third Party Claim pursuant to Section 1.3(b), 1.3(c) or 1.3(d), the other party (the “Non-Defending Party”) shall have the right to participate in the defense of such Third Party Claim; provided, however, that (i) the Defending Party shall control, manage and direct the defense of such Third Party Claim; and (ii) the costs and expenses of participating in such defense by the Non-Defending Party shall be the sole responsibility of the Non-Defending Party. Nothing in this Section 1.3(e) shall affect the rights of Mestek under Section 1.3(c) at any time to assume the defense of any Third Party Claim and to be indemnified for costs and expenses of such defense in accordance with Section 1.3(c).


    (f)               No Settlement, Compromise or Consent to Judgments .


    (i)               No Non-Defending Party may compromise or settle or consent to the entry of judgment or determination of liability with respect to any Third Party Claim without the consent of the Defending Party.


    (ii)               Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no Defending Party shall compromise, settle or consent to the entry of judgment or determination of liability concerning any Third Party Claim without providing at least 10 days’ prior written notice of such compromise, settlement or consent to the Indemnitor (if the Indemnitor is other than the Defending Party) and, if the terms of conditions of such compromise, settlement or consent would have a material adverse effect on the Non- Defending party without the consent of the Non-Defending Party (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned).


    1.4        Additional Matters.


    (a)               Other Claims for Indemnification . Any claim in respect of a Liability which does not relate to, arise out of or result from a Third Party Claim shall be asserted by written notice from the Indemnitee to the Indemnifying Party stating the specific provisions of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement upon which such claim is based. Such Indemnifying Party shall have a period of twenty (20) days from actual receipt of the notice within which to respond thereto. If such Indemnifying Party does not respond within such 20-day period, then such Indemnifying Party shall be deemed to have denied responsibility for such claim.


    (b)               Subrogation . In the event of payment by or on behalf of any Indemnifying Party to or on behalf of any Indemnitee in connection with any Third Party Claim, such Indemnifying Party shall be subrogated to and shall stand in the place of such Indemnitee, in whole or in part based upon whether the Indemnifying Party has paid all or only part of the Indemnitee’s Liability, as to any events or circumstances in respect of which such Indemnitee may have any right, defense or claim relating to such Third Party Claim against any claimant or plaintiff asserting such Third Party Claim or against any other Person. Such Indemnitee shall cooperate with such Indemnifying Party in a reasonable manner, and at the cost and expense of such Indemnifying Party, in prosecuting any subrogated right, defense or claim.


    (c)               Effect of Insurance on Indemnification/Contribution Obligations . No Indemnitee shall be required to pursue any claim under any Insurance Policies of which it is a beneficiary in connection with any Liability for which such Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification hereunder. The amount of indemnification or contribution to which such Indemnitee may be entitled hereunder shall not be reduced as a result of any claim such Indemnitee may pursue, or have the right to pursue, under any Insurance Policy in respect of the Liability to which such right to indemnification or contribution relates, unless the Indemnitee shall have actually recovered any portion of such Liability from its insurance carrier(s), in which case, whether or not the amount of indemnification or contribution to such Indemnitee shall be reduced shall be determined in accordance with Sections 1.1(b) and 1.2(b), as applicable.


    [(d)               Not Applicable to Taxes . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not apply to Taxes (which are covered by the Tax Agreement).]


    1.5         Survival of Indemnities . Subject to Section 5.4, the rights and obligations of the members of the Mestek Group and the Omega Group under this Article I shall survive the sale or other transfer by any party of any assets or businesses or the assignment by it of any Liabilities or the sale by any member of the Mestek Group or the Omega Group of the capital stock or other equity interests of any Subsidiary to any Person.


    2.        Insurance Matters .

    2.1         Omega Insurance Coverage . Omega, and Omega alone, shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining insurance programs for its risk of loss beginning on the Distribution and for all time periods thereafter. Such insurance arrangements shall be separate and apart from Mestek’s insurance programs. Mestek shall not be required to maintain any insurance coverage for the benefit of the members of the Omega Group or the directors, officers or employees of any member of the Omega Group for any period after the Distribution.


    2.2         Mestek Insurance Coverage . Mestek shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining insurance programs for its risks of loss (a) for all of Mestek’s subsidiaries and businesses including Omega, for all time periods prior to the Distribution Date, and (b) for all of its subsidiaries and businesses excluding Omega from the Distribution Date and for all time periods thereafter.


    2.3         Cooperation and Agreement Not to Release Carriers . Each of Mestek and Omega will share such information as is reasonably necessary in order to permit the other to manage and conduct its insurance matters in an orderly fashion. Omega, at the request of Mestek, shall cooperate with and use commercially reasonable efforts to assist Mestek in recoveries for claims made under any Mestek Insurance Policy for the benefit of members of the Mestek Group. Neither Omega nor any of its Subsidiaries shall take any action which would intentionally jeopardize or otherwise interfere with the ability of any member of the Mestek Group to collect any proceeds payable pursuant to any insurance policy. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require Mestek to maintain any insurance coverage for any Member of the Omega Group or any of their officers, directors or employees.


    2.4         No Liability . Omega does hereby, for itself and as agent for each other member of the Omega Group, agree that no member of the Mestek Group or any Mestek Indemnitee shall have any Liability whatsoever as a result of the insurance policies and practices of Mestek and its Subsidiaries as in effect at any time prior to the Distribution Date, including as a result of the level or scope of any such insurance, the creditworthiness of any insurance carrier, the terms and conditions of any policy, the adequacy or timeliness of any notice to any insurance carrier with respect to any claim or potential claim or otherwise.


    2.5         No Restrictions . Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to restrict any member of the Omega Group from acquiring at its own expense any other insurance policy in respect of any Liabilities or covering any period.


    2.6         Further Agreements . Omega, the members of the Omega Group, and the directors, officers and employees of any member of the Omega Group, shall not make any claims under Mestek Insurance Policies, including in respect of events that occurred when Omega and the members of the Omega Group were subsidiaries of Mestek, without Mestek’s approval, which may be granted or withheld in Mestek’s sole discretion.


    3.        Dispute Resolution .

    Except as otherwise set forth in the distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement, any disputes arising out of or relating to the distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement (including this agreement but expressly excluding the managed care agreement), including, without limitation, disputes concerning the validity, interpretation and performance of or under any such agreement, shall be exclusively governed by and settled in accordance with the provisions of this article iii.

    3.1        Mediation/Arbitration.


    4.        Miscellaneous .

    4.1         Entire Agreement . This Agreement, the Distribution Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and any exhibits and schedules attached hereto and thereto, constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and shall supersede all prior written and oral and all contemporaneous oral agreements and understandings with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.


    4.2         Governing Law; Forum . This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as to all matters regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under principles of conflicts of laws applicable thereto. Under no circumstances may any party seek or be awarded punitive damages under this Agreement, the Distribution Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements.


    4.3         Notices . All notices and other communications required or permitted to be given by any party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing to and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered in person, by express or overnight mail delivery by a nationally recognized courier (delivery charges prepaid), or by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested), as follows:


    if to Mestek:


Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm Street
Westfield, MA 01085
Attention: President


    if to Omega:


Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery Way
Exton, PA 19341
Attention: President


    or to such other address as the party to whom notice is given may have previously furnished to the other in writing in the manner set forth above. All notices and other communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date of actual delivery.


    4.4         Binding Effect; Assignment; Third-Party Beneficiaries . Omega may not, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, whether by operation of law or otherwise, assign or transfer this Agreement or its rights or obligations hereunder, without Mestek’s prior written consent and, except as otherwise permitted hereby, any attempted assignment, transfer or delegation without such prior written consent shall be voidable at the sole option of Mestek. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict any transfer of this Agreement by Mestek, whether by operation of law or otherwise. Without limiting the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon Mestek and the other members of the Mestek Group and Omega and the other members of the Omega Group and inure solely to the benefit of the Omega Indemnitees and the Mestek Indemnitees and their respective legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other Person any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.


    4.5         Offset . In addition to, and not in limitation of, any other remedies any member of the Mestek Group or any Mestek Indemnitee may be entitled to under the Distribution Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement (including this Agreement), any member of the Mestek Group or any Mestek Indemnitee may satisfy any amounts owed to such member of the Mestek Group or Mestek Indemnitee by any member of the Omega Group by means of an offset against any amounts any member of the Mestek Group may from time to time owe to any member of the Omega Group or an Omega Indemnitee, whether under the Distribution Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement (including this Agreement), any other agreement or arrangement existing between any member of the Mestek Group and any member of the Omega Group, or otherwise.


    4.6         Counterparts . This Agreement, including any schedules and exhibits hereto, and the other documents referred to herein, may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.


    4.7         Severability . If any term or other provision of this Agreement or any schedules or exhibits attached hereto is determined by a court, administrative agency or arbitrator to be invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement will nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party hereto. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, this Agreement shall be modified by such court, agency or arbitrator so as to effect the original intent of the parties hereto as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the fullest extent possible.


    4.8         No Waiver . No failure or delay on the part of any party hereto in the exercise of any right hereunder shall impair such right or be construed to be a waiver of, or acquiescence in, any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement herein, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude other or further exercise thereof or of any other right.


    4.9         Amendment . No change or amendment will be made to this Agreement except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties to this Agreement.


    4.10         Interpretation . The headings contained in this Agreement, in any Annex, Exhibit or Schedule hereto and in the table or contents to this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Any capitalized term used in any Annex, Schedule or Exhibit but not otherwise defined therein, shall have the meaning assigned to such term in this Agreement. When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article or Section, or an Annex, Exhibit or Schedule, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of, or an Annex, Exhibit or Schedule to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated.


    5.               Definitions .

    5.1         Action . “Action” means any claim, demand, action, suit, countersuit, arbitration, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any federal, state, local, foreign or international governmental authority or any arbitration or mediation tribunal.


    5.2         Dispute . “Dispute” means a dispute arising from or in connection with the Distribution Agreement, this Agreement or any other Ancillary Agreement, whether based on contract, tort, or otherwise.


     5.3        Indemnitee. "Indemnitee" means a Mestek Indemnitee or an Omega Indemnitee.


    5.4         Indemnifying Party . “Indemnifying Party” means any party who is required to indemnify any other Person pursuant to this Agreement.


    5.5         Insurance Policies . “Insurance Policies” means insurance policies pursuant to which a Person makes a true risk transfer to an insurer.


    5.6         Liabilities . “Liabilities” means all debts, liabilities, guarantees, commitments and obligations, whether fixed, contingent or absolute, asserted or unasserted, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or not accrued, known or unknown, due or to become due, whenever or however arising (including, without limitation, whether arising out of any contract or tort based on negligence or strict liability) and whether or not the same would be required by generally accepted accounting principles to be reflected in financial statements or disclosed in the notes thereto. For purposes of any indemnification hereunder, “Liabilities” shall be deemed also to include any and all damages, claims, suits, judgments, fines, penalties, costs and expenses of any kind or character, including attorney’s fees and expenses, out-of-pocket costs of investigation and preparation, expert witness costs and any other fees and expenses associated with the defense of any Action whether relating to Third Party Claims or Actions against the other party hereto.


    5.7         Material Adverse Effect . “Material Adverse Effect” means, with respect to either Group, a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations or financial conditions of the members of such Group, taken as a whole, provided that, without limiting the events, circumstances or conditions which may constitute or result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Mestek Group, any compromise, settlement or consent affecting the Mestek Group that, if applied to Omega or any member of the Omega Group, would result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Omega Group, shall be deemed to result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Mestek Group.


    5.8         Omega Business. "Omega Business" means (a) the business and operations of Omega.


    5.9         Omega Indemnitees . “Omega Indemnitees” means Omega, each member of the Omega Group and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives.


    5.10         Omega Liabilities . “Omega Liabilities” means, collectively, all of the Liabilities of Omega and each of the other members of the Omega Group, including without limitation:


    (a)               all of the Liabilities reflected on the financial statements of Omega;


    (b)               all Liabilities which are incurred or arise, or which accrue or exist out of, or in connection with, or otherwise relate to or result from, the Omega Business including without limitation any liabilities relating to employment practices, employee benefits, products or professional liability, violation or nonconformity with the environmental laws, rule or regulations, or employee health and safety;


    (c)               all Liabilities of each member of the Omega Group under, allocated to or to be retained or assumed by Omega or any of the other members of the Omega Group pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreements.


    (d)               all of the Liabilities of any member of the Mestek Group or Omega Group (whenever arising whether prior to, on or following the Distribution Date) arising out of or in connection with or otherwise relating to the management or conduct of the Omega Business prior to, on, or following the Distribution Date;


    (e)               all Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from (a) any Actions in which any member of the Omega Group has been named as a defendant by a plaintiff or by way of counter claim by a defendant in any Action as of the date of this Agreement or any amendments to such Actions (the “Existing Actions”), (b) any of the facts, circumstances and events giving rise to any Action relating to Omega, the Omega Business, or any liability of Omega or the Omega Business prior to, on or after the Distribution Date, and (c) any Actions involving similar claims or which are based upon similar facts, circumstances or events, whether involving the same parties or other parties, in each case whether relating to, arising out of or resulting from facts, circumstances or events prior to, on or after the Distribution Date;


    (f)               all Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, any Third Party Claim relating to, arising out of or resulting from any infringement or alleged infringement by Omega on any intellectual property or other rights of any Person;


    (g)               all liabilities arising out of or relating to any Taxes assessed, levied or claimed by any governmental authority or agency against Omega or relating to the Omega Business.


    (h)               all Securities Liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from (A) the Distribution and any documents, information or data (financial or otherwise) furnished or provided, orally or in writing, to purchasers or transferees or potential purchasers and transferees (or any of their respective representatives), in connection therewith or filed or furnished in connection therewith with or to any Governmental Authority or any securities exchange or securities market, including, without limitation, the Registration Statements, (B) any other offer, issuance, sale, exchange or other transfer of securities of or by Omega or any member of the Omega Group prior to, on or after the Distribution Date, or any documents, information or data (financial or otherwise) furnished or provided, orally or in writing, to transferees or purchasers or potential transferees or purchasers (or any of their respective representatives) of such securities or filed or furnished in connection therewith with or to any Governmental Authority or securities exchange or securities market, including, without limitation, any registration statement, (C) any oral or written disclosure made, whether or not included in documents filed with or furnished to any Governmental Authority or securities exchange or securities market, by Omega or any member of the Omega Group, or on behalf of Omega or any Member of the Omega Group, prior to, on or after the Distribution Date or any disclosure made (other than by a member of the Mestek Group), orally or in writing, of information or data (financial or otherwise) relating to or concerning Omega or any other member of the Omega Group, the business, operations and management of the Omega Business and/or Omega or any other member of the Omega Group, and (D) any oral or written disclosure made, whether or not included in documents filed with or furnished to any Governmental Authority or securities exchange or securities market, by Mestek or any member of the Mestek Group prior to, on or after the Distribution Date based on any information or data (financial or otherwise) provided by or on behalf of Omega or any member of the Omega Group; and


    (i)               all other Liabilities arising out of, relating to or resulting from any Action or Third Party Claim by any Governmental Authority or any other Person that is based on (A) any violations or alleged violations by Omega, its Subsidiaries and/or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives of any of the provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, or the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder, any other securities or similar law or any other law, rule or regulation, or (B) any breach or alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the Omega Board or any Committee of the Omega Board (or any member of the Omega Board or any Committee thereof) or the board of directors or similar body or any Committee of the board of directors or similar body (or any member of any such board or similar body or any Committee thereof) of any other member of the Omega Group, or by any officer or employee of any member of the Omega Group.


    5.11         Mestek Indemnitees . “Mestek Indemnitees” means Mestek, each member of the Mestek Group and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives.


    5.12         Mestek Insurance Policy . “Mestek Insurance Policy” shall mean each Insurance Policy owned or maintained by a member of the Mestek Group.


    5.13         Mestek Liabilities. “Mestek Liabilities” means


    (a)               all Liabilities of any member of the Mestek Group under, allocated to or to be retained or assumed by Mestek or any of the other members of the Mestek Group pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, this Agreement or any other Ancillary Agreement;


    (b)               all Liabilities incurred by members of the Mestek Group in connection with the management or conduct prior to, on or following the Distribution Date of the Mestek Business.


    5.14         Securities Liabilities . “Securities Liabilities” means any and all losses, liabilities, penalties, claims, damages, demands, costs or expenses or other Liabilities whatsoever that are assessed, imposed, awarded against, incurred or accrued by a Person arising out of or relating in whole or in part to any Action, any potential or threatened Action, any Third Party Claim or any potential or threatened Third Party Claim by any Governmental Authority or any other Person that is based on any violations or alleged violations of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, and any of the rules or regulations of the Commission promulgated under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, or any other securities or other similar laws, rules or regulations, including, without limitation, state securities or “blue sky” laws, rules or regulations, foreign securities laws, rules or regulations and rules or regulations of any securities exchange or market.


    5.15         Distribution Agreement. "Distribution Agreement" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals hereof.


    5.16         Subsidiary. "Subsidiary" has the meaning set forth in the Distribution Agreement.


    5.17         Taxes. "Taxes" has the meaning set forth in the Tax Agreement.


    5.18         Third Party Claim . “Third Party Claim” means an Action brought, asserted, commenced or pursued by a Person (including any Governmental Authority) other than a member of the Mestek Group or the Omega Group.


    5.19         Other Definitions . Any capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Distribution Agreement.


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its officers thereunto duly authorized on the day and year first above written.

MESTEK, INC.


By:_________________________________
Name:
Title:


OMEGA FLEX, INC.


By:_________________________________
Name:
Title:


Exhibit 10.5

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the ___ day of ______, 1996, by and between Kevin R. Hoben, a Connecticut resident, (“Employee”) and Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), whose principal office is located at 451 Creamery Way, Exton, Pennsylvania 19341-2509.

WITNESSETH

        WHEREAS, Employee desires to serve as President of the Company, the Company desires to employ Employee as President of the Company, and Employee and the Company desire to embody in this Agreement the terms and conditions under which Employee shall be employed;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Employee and the Company, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

    1.         REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

    a.               Employee represents and warrants the following:


    i.     Employee possesses information regarding the designing, manufacturing, fabricating, assembling, buying and selling flexible metal hose products;


    ii.      To the best of Employee’s knowledge, such information is not information that is proprietary to any other person or entity; is not confidential information of any other person or entity; is not under any restriction, or subject to any non-disclosure agreement, that would prevent Employee from utilizing such information for the benefit of the Company; and is not the subject of a patent or patent application; and


    iii.      Employee is not aware of any restriction, or subject to any agreement, that would prevent him from accepting employment with the Company under the terms of this Agreement.


    b.               The Company represents and warrants the following:


    i.                      It has no desire or expectation that Employee provide to the Company or utilize in his performance under this Agreement, any information that is confidential or proprietary to any other person or entity;


    ii.               This Agreement and Employee’s appointment as an officer of the Company hereunder have been affirmed and ratified by all required corporate actions.


    2.         DEFINITIONS

                   For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:

    a.               “Affiliate” of the Company (as hereinafter defined) shall mean any other Person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Company.


    b.               “Associated Company” of the Company shall mean any Affiliate of the Company, or any other Person in which the Company (or an Affiliate of the Company) holds an ownership interest of any size.


    c.               The “Company” shall mean Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation;


    d.               “Confidential Information” shall mean any information relating directly or indirectly to the business of the Company and its Affiliates which is not generally known to the public and which the Company or its Affiliates protect as proprietary including inventions, improvements, concepts, structures, formulae, techniques, processes, apparata, know how, trade secrets, customer requirements, plans, records and data, and may also include customer lists and knowledge about the general business affairs of the Company; whether conveyed in written, graphic, aural, physical or electronic form; however, Confidential Information does not include information which Employee can demonstrate was known to or was in the possession of Employee prior to disclosure by the Company or its Affiliates, was generally available to the public or was otherwise part of the public domain after the time of disclosure to Employee by the Company or its Affiliates or became so through no act or omission of Employee, or was properly provided to Employee by an independent third party who has or had no obligation of secrecy to the Company or its Affiliates.


    e.               “Employee” shall mean Kevin R. Hoben, a resident of Connecticut.


    f.               “Person” shall mean any natural person or any corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, firm or other entity, and


    g.               “Effective Date” shall mean the date first above written.


    3.         EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF EMPLOYEE

    a.               Performance of Job Duties . Employee is engaged for the initial period hereof as President of the Company to perform such duties and services as are reasonably related thereto. During the term of this Agreement, Employee shall devote his full time and attention and his best efforts to the conduct of the business of the Company and the performance of his duties under this Agreement, and shall not engage in any other business activity; provided that Employee shall not be prevented from investing his personal assets in such manner as will not require significant services on the part of Employee; and further provided, that such foregoing restriction shall not apply to Employee’s activities as a shareholder and employee of New Grind, Inc. d/b/a Coffee Beanery and its successors and assigns.


    b.               Service with parent of the Company . Employee shall also be appointed a Vice President of Mestek, Inc., the parent of the Company (“Mestek”).


    c.               Company’s Obligations . Except as provided in Section 9, the Company may not, without Employee’s prior consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld:


    i.               terminate or demote Employee or otherwise detrimentally change, directly or indirectly, the stature of Employee’s position, including but not limited to, title, salary, bonus or other perquisites; or


    ii.               narrow the scope of Employee’s duties or otherwise detrimentally change Employee’s job description.


    iii.               change the location of Employee’s office and principal workplace outside a radius of fifty miles; however, Employee specifically acknowledges and agrees that travel to and work at the offices of the Company in Exton, Pennsylvania, and the businesses of vendors and customers will be required for the full and faithful performance of the duties and responsibilities hereunder.


    4.         TERM OF AGREEMENT

        This Agreement shall go into effect as of the Effective Date and shall terminate three (3) years following the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier as provided in Section 9. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for additional one (1) year terms upon the expiration of the three-year term, unless the Company gives Employee at least six (6) months’ prior written notice of its intention not to extend the Agreement. The Company’s rights and obligations upon issuing such prior written notice of its intention not to extend the Agreement are set forth in Section 9(a) below.

    5.         COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEE

        As compensation and consideration for the performance by Employee of his obligations under this Agreement, Employee shall be entitled to the following (subject to the provisions of Section 9 hereof):

    a.               Base Salary . During the term of this Agreement, the Company shall pay to Employee a gross base salary totaling One Hundred Five Thousand U.S. Dollars (U.S. $105,000.00) per annum. This base salary shall be payable in regular bi-weekly intervals and shall be subject to such withholding and other normal employee deductions as may be required by law. This base salary may be increased by the Company’s Board of Directors in their sole discretion. It is anticipated that the base salary will be reviewed by the Board of Directors on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement each year.


    b.               Additional Employee Benefits and Perquisites . In addition to the annual base salary, Employee shall receive all benefits and perquisites of current Company employees, as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors or its designee, but not limited to:


    i.               Bonus Plan . During the term of this Agreement, the Company will offer Employee participation in a bonus program as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.


    ii.               Stock Options . During the term of this Agreement, the Company will, upon the affirmative vote of its shareholder, offer Employee the opportunity to participate in the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto, whereby, pursuant to a written option agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto, Employee will be granted options to purchase up to ten percent (10%) of the common stock of the Company exerciseable at the equivalent price paid by Mestek in its acquisition of the stock of the Company on February 2, 1996, and the right to purchase such shares shall vest in five (5) equal annual increments beginning upon the third anniversary of the grant thereof. Employee and the Company shall execute a Shareholder Agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto.


    iii.               Benefits . Employee shall be eligible to participate during the term of this Agreement in such life insurance, health, dental, short- and long-term disability and medical insurance benefits, pension, and such other employee benefit plans and programs for the benefit of the employees of the Company, as may be maintained from time to time, in each case to the extent and in the manner available to other executive officers of the Company, and subject to the terms and provisions of such plan or programs.


    iv.               Vacation . Employee shall be entitled to twenty (20) days of paid vacation during each calendar year and to all paid holidays of the Company.


    v.               Expenses . The Company shall reimburse Employee for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Employee in connection with the business of the Company and in performance of his duties under this Agreement, upon his presentation to the Company of an itemized accounting of such expenses with reasonable supporting data, subject, however, to the Company’s policies relating to business-related expenses as in effect from time to time.


    vi.               Automobile . The Company will lease or purchase for the use of Employee in the performance of his duties and responsibilities under this Agreement an automobile comparable in price and features to a Buick Park Avenue.


    c.               Signing Bonus . Employee shall be paid a signing bonus of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00).


    6.         CONFIDENTIALITY

    a.               Confidentiality . Employee acknowledges that during the course of his employment with the Company he will, from time to time, be invested with Confidential Information relating to the business practices of the Company, Associated Companies of the Company, and customers of the Company. Employee hereby agrees to keep all Confidential Information confidential. Employee also agrees that he will not, except as required in the conduct of Company business, or as authorized in writing by the Company, publish, disclose or make use of, for his or any third party’s benefit or account, any Confidential Information unless and until such Confidential Information shall have ceased to be secret or confidential due to no act or omission on his part.


    b.               Exclusive Property . Employee confirms that all Confidential Information is the exclusive property of the Company. All Confidential Information, including without limitation, business records, papers and other documents kept or made by Employee relating to the business of the Company or an Associated Company shall be and remain the property of the Company or the Associated Company. Upon the termination of his employment with the Company or upon the request of the Company at any time, Employee shall promptly deliver to the Company, and shall retain no copies of, any Confidential Information, including without limitation, any written materials, records and documents made by Employee or coming into his possession concerning the business or affairs of the Company or an Associated Company other than personal notes or correspondence of Employee not containing Confidential Information relating to such business or affairs.


    c.               Exceptions for Governmental or Judicial Orders . Employee shall have no liability under this Section 6 due to his disclosure of Confidential Information made pursuant to judicial or governmental order, provided Employee (if allowed under applicable law) notifies the Company as soon as possible and in any event prior to such disclosure cooperates with the Company in the event the Company elects to legally contest and avoid such disclosure. The Company shall defend Employee and indemnify him from any and all damages, losses, causes of action and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by him as a result of the Company’s actions to legally contest and avoid any such disclosure.


    d.               Survival of Section . The provisions of this Section 6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


    7.         EXCLUSIVITY / NON-COMPETITION

    a.               Exclusivity / Non-Competing Employment . For the term of this Agreement and a period of one (1) year following expiration of this Agreement or the earlier termination thereof as provided in Section 9 (the “Restricted Period”), Employee shall not, unless he receives the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly, own an interest in, manage, operate, join, control, lend money or render financial or other assistance to or participate in or be connected with, as an officer, employee, partner, stockholder, consultant or otherwise, any individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization or entity that at such time is engaged in the same type of business as the Company, and Employee shall not, whether for his own account or for the account of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization, intentionally solicit, endeavor to entice away from the Company or an Associated Company, or otherwise interfere with the relationship of the Company or an Associated Company with any person or entity who is, or was within the most recent twelve-month period, a customer or client of the Company or an Associated Company.


    b.               No Interference . For the term of this Agreement and a period of three (3) years following expiration of this Agreement or the earlier termination thereof as provided in Section 9, Employee shall not, whether for his own account or for the account of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization, intentionally solicit, endeavor to entice away from the Company or an Associated Company, or otherwise interfere with the relationship of the Company or an Associated Company with any person who is employed by the Company or an Associated Company.


    c.               Stock Ownership . Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit Employee from acquiring or holding any securities of any company listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on the automated quotation system of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., provided that at any time during the Restricted Period Employee and members of his immediate family do not own more than five percent (5%) of any voting securities of any company engaged in the same type of business as the Company.


    d.               Territorial Scope . The prohibitions in Sections 7(a) and 7(b) shall extend to any place where the Company is doing business on the first day of the Restricted Period.


    e.               Survival of Section . The provisions of this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


    8.         REMEDIES

    a.               Specific Performance . Employee hereby acknowledges that a breach of Sections 6 or 7 of this Agreement may result in material irreparable injury to the Company for which there in no adequate remedy at law, that it will not be possible to measure damages for such a breach, and that in the event of such a breach or threat thereof the Company shall be entitled to obtain a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction or other equitable relief restraining Employee from engaging in activities prohibited by this Agreement. Employee further acknowledges that in the event of such a breach or threat thereof the Company shall be entitled to obtain such other or further relief as may be required to specifically enforce any of the covenants of this Agreement. Employee hereby agrees and consents that such injunctive or other relief may be sought in any state or federal court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Chester, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or in the state and county in which such violation may occur or in any other court having jurisdiction, at the election of the Company. Employee agrees to and hereby does submit to in personam Jurisdiction before each and every such court for that purpose.


    b.               Suspension of Payments . Employee hereby acknowledges that should an alleged breach of Sections 6 or 7 of this Agreement occur, the Company is entitled to suspend any payments due to Employee during litigation of any action it may bring against Employee for injunctive and/or monetary relief; however, in the event that the Company does not prevail in such litigation, it shall owe Employee double the amount of the payments that were suspended.


    c.               Remedies not Exclusive . The remedies of this Section shall be cumulative and not exclusive, and shall be in addition to any other remedy which the company may have.


    d.               Survival of Remedies . This Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


     9.                TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

        Employee’s employment hereunder may be terminated without any breach of this Agreement under the following conditions:

    a.               Termination by Employee Without Cause . Employee may terminate this Agreement without Cause (as hereinafter defined) prior to the expiration of this Agreement, by sending written notice of such termination at least three (3) months in advance of the effective date of such termination. If Employee elects to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 9(a), he shall not be entitled to any compensation or benefits after the effective date of his termination other than any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement.


    b.               Termination by the Company for Cause . The Company may terminate the Agreement and Employee’s employment with Cause prior to the expiration of this Agreement, by sending Employee written notice of such termination for Cause. The date of such notice shall be the effective date of the termination of this Agreement. If the Company terminates Employee’s employment for Cause, Employee shall receive a severance payment in an amount equal to one-twelfth his annual base salary at the rate effective on the date of termination payable within thirty (30) days of such termination. For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” shall mean (1) dishonesty or fraud resulting in damage to the business of the Company or its Affiliates; (2) embezzlement or theft of assets of the Company or any of its Affiliates; (3) competing with the Company or aiding a competitor of the Company or any of its Affiliates to the detriment of the Company or any of its Affiliates; (4) a substantial breach of this Agreement; (5) conviction for a felony resulting in damage to the business of the Company or its Affiliates; or (6) any other willful misconduct by Employee which is materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise. If the Company terminates this Agreement and Employee’s employment for Cause, he shall not be entitled to any compensation or benefits after the effective date of his termination other than any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement.


    c.               Later Employment With Successor in interest of Company . Employee shall not be deemed to have been terminated under this Agreement if he is offered employment on substantially the same or better terms by any Affiliate, successor in interest or assign of the Company, or by any purchaser of substantially all of the Company’s assets. In the event that Employee chooses not to accept to such employment, Mestek shall offer employment on equivalent terms to Employee.


    d.               Company’s Rights and Obligations Upon Election Not to Extend Agreement . If the Company elects not to extend the Agreement or any extension thereof as provided for in Section 4, the Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of the term or as otherwise agreed in writing by the parties. Upon the effective date of termination of this Agreement whether at the end of the term or upon mutual agreement of the parties, Employee’s employment with the Company shall terminate, and Employee shall receive severance payments in an amount equal to his annual base salary at the rate in effect on the date of termination payable in twenty-six (26) equal bi-weekly installments, and continued use of the automobile described herein and extension without cost of the medical and dental programs in which Employee for a period of one year after such termination.


    e.               Death . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, Employee’s employment and this Agreement shall terminate upon his death and neither he nor his heirs shall be entitled to any compensation or benefits under this Agreement after the effective date of his termination other than (i) any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement, and (ii) any rights under the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan or as a shareholder of the Company, if any.


    f.               Delivery of Material . Employee agrees that upon the termination of this Agreement he will deliver to the Company all documents, papers, materials and other property of the Company relating to its affairs which may then be in his possession or under his control including Confidential Information.


    10.         INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITS ON LIABILITY

    Mestek        shall indemnify Employee for any and all acts and omissions to act made during the term of this Agreement in his capacity both as an officer of the Company and of Mestek, and Employee’s personal liability for such acts and omissions shall be limited, to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as the same may be amended and supplemented. This Section 10 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


    11.                NOTICES

        All notices given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when served personally or on the third business day after being deposited in the United states mail, certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows;

         If to the Company:

Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery Way
Exton, Pennsylvania 19341-2509


         With a copy to:

  R. Bruce Dewey, Esq.
Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm Street
Westfield, MA 01085

         If to Employee:

  Kevin R. Hoben
#9 Chiltern Street
Farmington, Connecticut 06032

     12.        MISCELLANEOUS

        Any party may change its address for notices by communicating its new address in writing to the other party.

          a.        Agreement is Non-Assignable . This Agreement is a personal service contract and shall not be assignable by Employee or by the company, except that the Company may assign this Agreement to a Person which succeeds to the Company’s rights and liabilities by merger, sale of assets as a going concern, or consolidation with the Company.

          b.        Binding Effect . All rights and obligations and agreements of the parties under this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against, and inure to the benefit of the parties and their personal representatives, heirs, legatees and devises, and any Person succeeding by operation of law to their rights under this Agreement, except that such personal representatives, heirs, legatees, devises and other persons shall have no obligation to perform Employee’s duties described in section 3 hereof .

          c.        Representations . Employee and the Company each represent and warrant that there are no restrictions, agreements or limitations on their rights or ability to enter into and perform the terms of this Agreement.

          d.        Further Assurances , Employee and the Company, as the case may be, shall execute and deliver such further instruments and do such further acts and things as may be required to carry out the terms or conditions of this Agreement or as may be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Agreement.

          e.        Rights of Third Parties . Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.

          f.        Effect of Waiver . A Waiver of, or failure to exercise, any rights provided for in this Agreement, in any respect, shall not be deemed a waiver of any further or future rights hereunder. Except for rights which must be exercised within a specified time period under this Agreement, no rights herein shall be considered as waived, whether intentionally or not, unless waived in a writing signed by the party to be charged with the waiver.

          g.        Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania applicable to contracts made and performed in that jurisdiction, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.

          h.        Amendments . This Agreement may not be changed or amended orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by all parties hereto.

          i.        Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

          j.        Severability . If a court of competent jurisdiction declares that any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, then:

          i.        the remaining terms and provisions hereof shall be unimpaired, and

          ii.        the invalid or unenforceable term or provision shall be deemed replaced by a term or provision that is valid and enforceable and that comes closest to expressing the intention of the invalid or unenforceable term or provision.

          k.        Entire Agreement . This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of Employee by the Company. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the employment of Employee by the Company, and the parties shall not be bound by any terms, conditions, statements, covenants, representations or warranties, oral or written, not herein contained.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement effective as of the date first above written.

EMPLOYEE: COMPANY:
    OMEGA FLEX, INC.,  
    a Pennsylvania corporation  
_______________________     By:_______________________  
KEVIN R. HOBEN     John E. Reed, Chairman  

Mestek hereby agrees to be bound by those particular representations, warranties and covenants of this Agreement that require or obligate it to act for, on behalf of or with regard to Employee.

MESTEK, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation

By:_______________________
John E. Reed, President

EXHIBIT A

BONUS PROGRAM

YEAR ONE:

        The following Bonus Program shall be in effect for the term commencing April 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996. For the foregoing period, to qualify for a bonus, Employee, through his leadership and management, shall have caused the following milestones or benchmarks in the CSST Development Program and the Omega Flex Business to be met in a manner satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the Company:

CSST DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM:

    1.        Complete fitting design; make patent application.

    2.        Evaluate hose manufacturing process and modify hose geometry:

    a.        Maximize equivalent hydraulic diameter


    b.        Refine hose to fitting interface


    c.        Meet established bend diameter requirements


    3.        Develop sources and/or tooling for system components including striker plates, manifolds, all fitting configurations, valves, interlock and regulators.

    4.        Develop jacket prototype with outside extruder.

    5.        Submit capital spending plan for Phase 1 of CSST Development Program.

    6.        Complete draft of Design and Installation Manual.

    7.        Submit completed system to AGA/CGA Laboratory for test and certification.

    8.        Begin purchasing capital equipment for Phase 1 of CSST Development Program, including development of a time line with equipment, delivery and installation schedule.

    9.        Finalize all matters with respect to product packaging.

OMEGA FLEX BUSINESS

    1.        Expand export sales fifty percent (50%).

    2.        Generate a favorable purchase price variance of two and one-half percent (2 ½ %) on the purchase of wire and strip.

    3.        Increase the three-year average core business growth rate by a minimum of twelve and one-half percent (12 ½%).

    4.        Maintain Omega Flex aggregate gross profit percentage at not less than thirty-seven percent (37%) and SG&A expenses at or under budget, which budget will not include Employee and others in the CSST Development Program.

        In the event that the milestones and benchmarks of both the CSST Development Program and the Omega Flex Business are fully met, a maximum bonus of $60,000 will have been earned by Employee. Such bonus would be payable by the 15th day of March, 1997. In the event that the milestones and benchmarks have not been fully met, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, in discussion with the President of the Company, would determine a deemed percentage of completion and the bonus payable would be equal to $60,000 times the percentage deemed completed.

YEAR TWO:

        The bonus for the year beginning January 1, 1997 and ending December 31, 1997 will be on the same “milestone and benchmark” basis as in Year One or on the basis of meeting return on investment criteria similar to that used by the Company’s parent company, Mestek, Inc., at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company. In the event a “milestone and benchmark” basis is used, the maximum bonus shall be $60,000, adjusted for percentage of completion, and the following milestones for the CSST Development Program shall be used:

    1.        Design layout for catalog, other sales literature and price sheets.

    2.        Develop training video or other suitable training media.

    3.        Appoint and train the appropriate sales representatives.

    4.        Identify, appoint and train other sales representatives as required.

    5.        Appoint initial wholesalers and train and certify installers of the product.

    6.        Obtain code approvals beyond ANSI/LC-1, including Massachusetts, Michigan, Dade County, IAPMO.

    7.        Installation of Phase 1 equipment completed.

    8.        Media campaign completed and product launched.

    9.        Initiate on-going gas utility marketing promotions.

        The Omega Flex Business benchmarks would be the same for Year Two (1997) as for Year One (the three-quarter year of 1996).

YEAR THREE:

        The bonus for the year beginning January 1, 1998 and ending December 31, 1998 will be on the basis of meeting return on investment criteria similar to that used by the Company’s parent company, Mestek, Inc.

Exhibit 10.6

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the ___ day of ______, 1996, by and between Mark F. Albino, a Massachusetts resident, (“Employee”) and Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), whose principal office is located at 451 Creamery Way, Exton, Pennsylvania 19341-2509.

WITNESSETH

        WHEREAS, Employee desires to serve as Senior Vice President-Manufacturing & Engineering Services of the Company, the Company desires to employ Employee as Senior Vice President-Manufacturing & Engineering Services of the Company, and Employee and the Company desire to embody in this Agreement the terms and conditions under which Employee shall be employed;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Employee and the Company, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

    1.         REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

    a.               Employee represents and warrants the following:


    i.               Employee possesses information regarding the designing, manufacturing, fabricating, assembling, buying and selling flexible metal hose products;


    ii.               To the best of Employee’s knowledge, such information is not information that is proprietary to any other person or entity; is not confidential information of any other person or entity; is not under any restriction, or subject to any non-disclosure agreement, that would prevent Employee from utilizing such information for the benefit of the Company; and is not the subject of a patent or patent application; and


    iii.               Employee is not aware of any restriction, or subject to any agreement, that would prevent him from accepting employment with the Company under the terms of this Agreement.


    b.               The Company represents and warrants the following:


    i.               It has no desire or expectation that Employee provide to the Company or utilize in his performance under this Agreement, any information that is confidential or proprietary to any other person or entity;


    ii.               This Agreement and Employee’s appointment as an officer of the Company hereunder have been affirmed and ratified by all required corporate actions.



    2.         DEFINITIONS

            For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:

    a.               “Affiliate” of the Company (as hereinafter defined) shall mean any other Person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Company.


    b.               “Associated Company” of the Company shall mean any Affiliate of the Company, or any other Person in which the Company (or an Affiliate of the Company) holds an ownership interest of any size.


    c.               The “Company” shall mean Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation;


    d.               “Confidential Information” shall mean any information relating directly or indirectly to the business of the Company and its Affiliates which is not generally known to the public and which the Company or its Affiliates protect as proprietary including inventions, improvements, concepts, structures, formulae, techniques, processes, apparata, know how, trade secrets, customer requirements, plans, records and data, and may also include customer lists and knowledge about the general business affairs of the Company; whether conveyed in written, graphic, aural, physical or electronic form; however, Confidential Information does not include information which Employee can demonstrate was known to or was in the possession of Employee prior to disclosure by the Company or its Affiliates, was generally available to the public or was otherwise part of the public domain after the time of disclosure to Employee by the Company or its Affiliates or became so through no act or omission of Employee, or was properly provided to Employee by an independent third party who has or had no obligation of secrecy to the Company or its Affiliates.


    e.               “Employee” shall mean Mark F. Albino, a resident of Massachusetts.


    f.               “Person” shall mean any natural person or any corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, firm or other entity, and


    g.               “Effective Date” shall mean the date first above written.


    3.         EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF EMPLOYEE

    a.               Performance of Job Duties . Employee is engaged as Senior Vice President-Manufacturing & Engineering Services of the Company to perform such duties and services as are reasonably related thereto. During the term of this Agreement, Employee shall devote his full time and attention and his best efforts to the conduct of the business of the Company and the performance of his duties under this Agreement, and shall not engage in any other business activity; provided that Employee shall not be prevented from investing his personal assets in such manner as will not require significant services on the part of Employee.


    b.                Company’s Obligations.


    i.               Except as provided in Section 9, the Company may not, without Employee’s prior consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, directly or indirectly, narrow the scope of Employee’s duties or otherwise detrimentally change Employee’s job description.


    ii.               Change the location of Employee’s office and principal workplace outside a radius of fifty miles; however, Employee specifically acknowledges and agrees that travel to and work at the offices of the Company in Exton, Pennsylvania, and the businesses of vendors and customers will be required for the full and faithful performance of the duties and responsibilities hereunder.



    4.         TERM OF AGREEMENT

        This Agreement shall go into effect as of the Effective Date and shall terminate three (3) years following the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier as provided in Section 9. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for additional one (1) year terms upon the expiration of the three-year term, unless the Company gives Employee at least six (6) months’ prior written notice of its intention not to extend the Agreement. The Company’s rights and obligations upon issuing such prior written notice of its intention not to extend the Agreement are set forth in Section 9(a) below.

    5.         COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEE

            As compensation and consideration for the performance by Employee of his obligations under this Agreement, Employee shall be entitled to the following (subject to the provisions of Section 9 hereof):

    a.               Base Salary . During the term of this Agreement, the Company shall pay to Employee a gross base salary totaling Eighty-Five Thousand U.S. Dollars (U.S. $85,000.00) per annum. This base salary shall be payable in regular bi-weekly intervals and shall be subject to such withholding and other normal employee deductions as may be required by law. This base salary may be increased by the Company’s Board of Directors in their sole discretion. It is anticipated that the base salary will be reviewed by the Board of Directors on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement each year.


    b.               Additional Employee Benefits and Perquisites . In addition to the annual base salary, Employee shall receive all benefits and perquisites of current Company employees, as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors or its designee, but not limited to:


    i.               Bonus Plan . During the term of this Agreement, the Company will offer Employee participation in a bonus program as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.


    ii.               Stock Options . During the term of this Agreement, the Company will, upon the affirmative vote of its shareholder, offer Employee the opportunity to participate in the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto, whereby, pursuant to a written option agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto, Employee will be granted options to purchase up to four percent (4%) of the common stock of the Company exerciseable at the equivalent price paid by Mestek in its acquisition of the stock of the Company on February 2, 1996, and the right to purchase such shares shall vest in five (5) equal annual increments beginning upon the third anniversary of the grant thereof. Employee and the Company shall execute a Shareholder Agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto.


    iii.               Benefits . Employee shall be eligible to participate during the term of this Agreement in such life insurance, health, dental, disability and medical insurance benefits, pension, and such other employee benefit plans and programs for the benefit of the employees of the Company, as may be maintained from time to time, in each case to the extent and in the manner available to other executive officers of the Company, and subject to the terms and provisions of such plan or programs.


    iv.               Vacation . Employee shall be entitled to fifteen (15) days of paid vacation during each calendar year and to all paid holidays of the Company.


    v.               Expenses . The Company shall reimburse Employee for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Employee in connection with the business of the Company and in performance of his duties under this Agreement, upon his presentation to the Company of an itemized accounting of such expenses with reasonable supporting data, subject, however, to the Company’s policies relating to business-related expenses as in effect from time to time.


    c.               Signing Bonus . Employee shall be paid a signing bonus of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00).



    6.         CONFIDENTIALITY

    a.               Confidentiality . Employee acknowledges that during the course of his employment with the Company he will, from time to time, be invested with Confidential Information relating to the business practices of the Company, Associated Companies of the Company, and customers of the Company. Employee hereby agrees to keep all Confidential Information confidential. Employee also agrees that he will not, except as required in the conduct of Company business, or as authorized in writing by the Company, publish, disclose or make use of, for his or any third party=s benefit or account, any Confidential Information unless and until such Confidential Information shall have ceased to be secret or confidential due to no act or omission on his part.


    b.               Exclusive Property . Employee confirms that all Confidential Information is the exclusive property of the Company. All Confidential Information, including without limitation, business records, papers and other documents kept or made by Employee relating to the business of the Company or an Associated Company shall be and remain the property of the Company or the Associated Company. Upon the termination of his employment with the Company or upon the request of the Company at any time, Employee shall promptly deliver to the Company, and shall retain no copies of, any Confidential Information, including without limitation, any written materials, records and documents made by Employee or coming into his possession concerning the business or affairs of the Company or an Associated Company other than personal notes or correspondence of Employee not containing Confidential Information relating to such business or affairs.


    c.               Exceptions for Governmental or Judicial Orders . Employee shall have no liability under this Section 6 due to his disclosure of Confidential Information made pursuant to judicial or governmental order, provided Employee (if allowed under applicable law) notifies the Company as soon as possible and in any event prior to such disclosure cooperates with the Company in the event the Company elects to legally contest and avoid such disclosure. The Company shall defend Employee and indemnify him from any and all damages, losses, causes of action and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by him as a result of the Company’s actions to legally contest and avoid any such disclosure.


    d.               Survival of Section . The provisions of this Section 6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


    7.         EXCLUSIVITY / NON-COMPETITION

    a.               Exclusivity / Non-Competing Employment . For the term of this Agreement and a period of one (1) year following expiration of this Agreement or the earlier termination thereof as provided in Section 9 (the “Restricted Period”), Employee shall not, unless he receives the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly, own an interest in, manage, operate, join, control, lend money or render financial or other assistance to or participate in or be connected with, as an officer, employee, partner, stockholder, consultant or otherwise, any individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization or entity that at such time is engaged in the flexible metal hose business as the Company, and Employee shall not, whether for his own account or for the account of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization, intentionally solicit, endeavor to entice away from the Company or an Associated Company, or otherwise interfere with the relationship of the Company or an Associated Company with any person or entity who is, or was within the most recent twelve-month period, a customer or client of the Company or an Associated Company.


    b.               No Interference . For the term of this Agreement and a period of three (3) years following expiration of this Agreement or the earlier termination thereof as provided in Section 9, Employee shall not, whether for his own account or for the account of any other individual, partnership, firm, corporation or other business organization, intentionally solicit, endeavor to entice away from the Company or an Associated Company, or otherwise interfere with the relationship of the Company or an Associated Company with any person who is employed by the Company or an Associated Company.


    c.               Stock Ownership . Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit Employee from acquiring or holding any securities of any company listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on the automated quotation system of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., provided that at any time during the Restricted Period Employee and members of his immediate family do not own more than five percent (5%) of any voting securities of any company engaged in the same type of business as the Company.


    d.               Territorial Scope . The prohibitions in Sections 7(a) and 7(b) shall extend to any place where the Company is doing business on the first day of the Restricted Period.


    e.               Survival of Section . The provisions of this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.



    8.         REMEDIES

    a.               Specific Performance . Employee hereby acknowledges that a breach of Sections 6 or 7 of this Agreement may result in material irreparable injury to the Company for which there in no adequate remedy at law, that it will not be possible to measure damages for such a breach, and that in the event of such a breach or threat thereof the Company shall be entitled to obtain a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction or other equitable relief restraining Employee from engaging in activities prohibited by this Agreement. Employee further acknowledges that in the event of such a breach or threat thereof the Company shall be entitled to obtain such other or further relief as may be required to specifically enforce any of the covenants of this Agreement. Employee hereby agrees and consents that such injunctive or other relief may be sought in any state or federal court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Chester, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or in the state and county in which such violation may occur or in any other court having jurisdiction, at the election of the Company. Employee agrees to and hereby does submit to in personam Jurisdiction before each and every such court for that purpose.


    b.               Suspension of Payments . Employee hereby acknowledges that should an alleged breach of Sections 6 or 7 of this Agreement occur, the Company is entitled to suspend any payments due to Employee during litigation of any action it may bring against Employee for injunctive and/or monetary relief; however, in the event that the Company does not prevail in such litigation, it shall owe Employee double the amount of the payments that were suspended.


    c.               Remedies not Exclusive . The remedies of this Section shall be cumulative and not exclusive, and shall be in addition to any other remedy which the company may have.


    d.               Survival of Remedies . This Section 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.


    9.         TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

           Employee’s employment hereunder may be terminated without any breach of this Agreement under the following conditions:

    a.               Termination by Employee Without Cause . Employee may terminate this Agreement without Cause (as hereinafter defined) prior to the expiration of this Agreement, by sending written notice of such termination at least three (3) months in advance of the effective date of such termination. If Employee elects to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 9(a), he shall not be entitled to any compensation or benefits after the effective date of his termination other than any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement.


    b.               Termination by the Company for Cause . The Company may terminate the Agreement and Employee’s employment with Cause prior to the expiration of this Agreement, by sending Employee written notice of such termination for Cause. The date of such notice shall be the effective date of the termination of this Agreement. If the Company terminates Employee’s employment for Cause, Employee shall receive a severance payment in an amount equal to one-twelfth his annual base salary at the rate effective on the date of termination payable within thirty (30) days of such termination. For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” shall mean (1) dishonesty or fraud resulting in damage to the business of the Company or its Affiliates; (2) embezzlement or theft of assets of the Company or any of its Affiliates; (3) competing with the Company or aiding a competitor of the Company or any of its Affiliates to the detriment of the Company or any of its Affiliates; (4) a substantial breach of this Agreement; (5) conviction for a felony resulting in damage to the business of the Company or its Affiliates; or (6) any other willful misconduct by Employee which is materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise. If the Company terminates this Agreement and Employee’s employment for Cause, he shall not be entitled to any compensation or benefits after the effective date of his termination other than any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement.


    c.               Later Employment With Successor in interest of Company . Employee shall not be deemed to have been terminated under this Agreement if he is offered employment on substantially the same or better terms by any Affiliate, successor in interest or assign of the Company, or by any purchaser of substantially all of the Company’s assets.


    d.               Company’s Rights and Obligations Upon Election Not to Extend Agreement . If the Company elects not to extend the Agreement or any extension thereof as provided for in Section 4, the Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of the term or as otherwise agreed in writing by the parties.


    e.               Death . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, Employee’s employment and this Agreement shall terminate upon his death and neither he nor his heirs shall be entitled to any compensation or benefits under this Agreement after the effective date of his termination other than (i) any bonus earned, but not yet paid, under this Agreement, and (ii) any rights under the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan or as a shareholder of the Company, if any.


    f.               Delivery of Material . Employee agrees that upon the termination of this Agreement he will deliver to the Company all documents, papers, materials and other property of the Company relating to its affairs which may then be in his possession or under his control.



    10.         INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITS ON LIABILITY

            The Company shall indemnify Employee for any and all acts and omissions to act made during the term of this Agreement in his capacity as an officer of the Company, and Employee’s personal liability for such acts and omissions shall be limited, to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as the same may be amended and supplemented. This Section 10 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.

    11.        NOTICES

            All notices given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when served personally or on the third business day after being deposited in the United states mail, certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows;

     If to the Company:


Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery Way
Exton, Pennsylvania 19341-2509


     With a copy to:


R. Bruce Dewey, Esq.
Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm Street
Westfield, MA 01085


     If to Employee:


Mark F. Albino
P.O. Box 347
Belchertown, Massachusetts 01007



    12.         Miscellaneous

            Any party may change its address for notices by communicating its new address in writing to the other party.

    a.               Agreement is Non-Assignable . This Agreement is a personal service contract and shall not be assignable by Employee or by the company, except that the Company may assign this Agreement to a Person which succeeds to the Company’s rights and liabilities by merger, sale of assets as a going concern, or consolidation with the Company.


    b.               Binding Effect . All rights and obligations and agreements of the parties under this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against, and inure to the benefit of the parties and their personal representatives, heirs, legatees and devises, and any Person succeeding by operation of law to their rights under this Agreement, except that such personal representatives, heirs, legatees, devises and other persons shall have no obligation to perform Employee’s duties described in section 3 hereof .


    c.               Representations . Employee and the Company each represent and warrant that there are no restrictions, agreements or limitations on their rights or ability to enter into and perform the terms of this Agreement.


    d.               Further Assurances , Employee and the Company, as the case may be, shall execute and deliver such further instruments and do such further acts and things as may be required to carry out the terms or conditions of this Agreement or as may be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Agreement.


    e.               Rights of Third Parties . Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.


    f.               Effect of Waiver . A Waiver of, or failure to exercise, any rights provided for in this Agreement, in any respect, shall not be deemed a waiver of any further or future rights hereunder. Except for rights which must be exercised within a specified time period under this Agreement, no rights herein shall be considered as waived, whether intentionally or not, unless waived in a writing signed by the party to be charged with the waiver.


    g.               Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania applicable to contracts made and performed in that jurisdiction, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.


    h.               Amendments . This Agreement may not be changed or amended orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by all parties hereto.


    i.               Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.


    j.               Severability . If a court of competent jurisdiction declares that any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, then:


    i.                      the remaining terms and provisions hereof shall be unimpaired, and


    ii.               the invalid or unenforceable term or provision shall be deemed replaced by a term or provision that is valid and enforceable and that comes closest to expressing the intention of the invalid or unenforceable term or provision.


    k.               Entire Agreement . This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of Employee by the Company. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the employment of Employee by the Company, and the parties shall not be bound by any terms, conditions, statements, covenants, representations or warranties, oral or written, not herein contained.


            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement effective as of the date first above written.

EMPLOYEE: COMPANY:
    OMEGA FLEX, INC.,  
    a Pennsylvania corporation  

_______________________
    By:_______________________  
MARK F. ALBINO     John E. Reed, Chairman  









EXHIBIT A

BONUS PROGRAM

        For all periods of this contract, a minimum bonus of seven percent (7%) of Employee’s annual salary is payable by the 15th day of March in the year following.

        In addition to the foregoing:

YEAR ONE:

        The following Bonus Program shall be in effect for the term commencing April 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996. For the foregoing period, to qualify for a bonus, Employee shall have caused the following milestones or benchmarks in the CSST Development Program and the Omega Flex Business to be met in a manner satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the Company:

CSST DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM:

    1.        Complete fitting design; make patent application.

    2.        Evaluate hose manufacturing process and modify hose geometry:

    a.        Maximize equivalent hydraulic diameter


    b.        Refine hose to fitting interface


    c.        Meet established bend diameter requirements


    3.        Develop sources and/or tooling for system components including striker plates, manifolds, all fitting configurations, valves, interlock and regulators.

    4.        Develop jacket prototype with outside extruder.

    5.        Submit capital spending plan for Phase 1 of CSST Development Program.

    6.        Complete draft of Design and Installation Manual.

    7.        Submit completed system to AGA/CGA Laboratory for test and certification.

    8.        Begin purchasing capital equipment for Phase 1 of CSST Development Program, including development of a time line with equipment, delivery and installation schedule.

    9.        Finalize all matters with respect to product packaging.

OMEGA FLEX BUSINESS

    1.        Install document control for engineering drawings, routers, purchased material specifications and bills of material.

    2.        Initiate and/or formalize C.I.P.

    3.        Maintain Omega Flex aggregate gross profit percentage at not less than thirty-seven percent (37%) and SG&A expenses at or under budget, which budget will not include Employee and others in the CSST Development Program.

        In the event that the milestones and benchmarks of both the CSST Development Program and the Omega Flex Business are fully met, a maximum bonus of $30,000 will have been earned by Employee. Such bonus would be payable by the 15th day of March, 1997. In the event that the milestones and benchmarks have not been fully met, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, in discussion with the President of the Company, would determine a deemed percentage of completion and the bonus payable would be equal to $30,000 times the percentage deemed completed.

YEAR TWO:

        The bonus for the year beginning January 1, 1997 and ending December 31, 1997 will be on the same “milestone and benchmark” basis as in Year One or on the basis of meeting return on investment criteria similar to that used by the Company’s parent company, Mestek, Inc., at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company. In the event a “milestone and benchmark” basis is used, the maximum bonus shall be $30,000, adjusted for percentage of completion, and the following milestones for the CSST Development Program shall be used:

    1.        Design layout for catalog, other sales literature and price sheets.

    2.        Develop training video or other suitable training media.

    3.        Appoint and train the appropriate sales representatives.

    4.        Identify, appoint and train other sales representatives as required.

    5.        Appoint initial wholesalers and train and certify installers of the product.

    6.        Obtain code approvals beyond ANSI/LC-1, including Massachusetts, Michigan, Dade County, IAPMO.

    7.        Installation of Phase 1 equipment completed.

    8.        Media campaign completed and product launched.

    9.        Initiate on-going gas utility marketing promotions.

        The Omega Flex Business benchmarks would be the same for Year Two (1997) as for Year One (the three-quarter year of 1996).

YEAR THREE:

        The bonus for the year beginning January 1, 1998 and ending December 31, 1998 will be on the basis of meeting return on investment criteria similar to that used by the Company’s parent company, Mestek, Inc.

Exhibit 10.7

SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

        THIS SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of ___________, 2005, between Mestek, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Mestek”), and Omega Flex, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Omega”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in Article VII hereof.

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, Mestek currently owns 86% of the of the issued and outstanding common stock of Omega;

        WHEREAS, Omega is engaged in the flexible metal hose business and related businesses as described in the Information Statement that is an exhibit to the Form 10 to be filed by Omega with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Omega Business”);

        WHEREAS, the Boards of Director of Mestek has determined that it would be appropriate and desirable for Mestek to distribute, pro rata, to the holders of its common stock, all of the shares of Omega common stock owned by Mestek (the “Distribution”);

        WHEREAS, Mestek and Omega intend that the Separation and the Distribution will qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”);

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.     SEPARATION

1.1.     Distribution Date . Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, or in any agreement to be executed in connection with this Agreement, the effective time and date of the Distribution, and each undertaking or agreement in connection therewith shall be 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, ___________, 2005, or such other date as may be fixed by the Board of Directors of Mestek (the “Distribution Date”).

1.2.     Closing of Transactions . Unless otherwise provided herein, the closing of the transactions contemplated in Article 2 shall occur by the execution and delivery of each of the executed instruments of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreement, to be held in escrow by Greenberg Traurig, P.C. for delivery as provided in Section 1.3.

1.3.     Exchange of Secretary’s Certificates . Upon receipt of a certificate of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of Mestek in the form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A , Greenberg Traurig shall deliver to Omega on behalf of Mestek all of the items required to be delivered by Mestek hereunder pursuant to Section 2.1 and each such item shall be deemed to be delivered to Omega as of the Distribution Date upon delivery of such certificate. Upon receipt of a certificate of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of Omega in the form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B , Greenberg Traurig shall deliver to Mestek on behalf of Omega all of the items required to be delivered by Omega pursuant to Section 2.2 hereunder and each such item shall be deemed to be delivered to Mestek as of the Distribution Date upon receipt of such certificate.

2.     DOCUMENTS TO BE DELIVERED ON THE DISTRIBUTION DATE

2.1.     Documents to Be Delivered by Mestek . On the Distribution Date or such other date as may be established by the board of directors of Mestek, or as otherwise agreed by the parties, Mestek will deliver to Omega all of the following items and agreements (collectively, together with all agreements and documents contemplated by such agreements, the “Ancillary Agreements”):

(a)     A duly executed Tax Sharing Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C ;

(b)     A duly executed Transitional Services Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D ;

(c)     A duly executed Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E ;

(d)     A duly executed Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F ;

(e)     Such other agreements, documents or instruments as the parties may agree are necessary or desirable in order to achieve the purposes hereof.

2.2.     Documents to Be Delivered by Omega . As of the Distribution Date, Omega will deliver to Mestek all of the following:

(a)     A duly executed Tax Sharing Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C ;

(b)     A duly executed Transitional Services Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D ;

(c)     A duly executed Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E ;

(d)     A duly executed Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F ;

(e)     Such other agreements, documents or instruments as the parties may agree are necessary or desirable in order to achieve the purposes hereof.

3.     THE DISTRIBUTION

3.1.     Delivery of Shares for Distribution . On or prior to the date the Distribution is effective (the “Distribution Date”), Mestek will deliver to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., the distribution agent of the Distribution (the “Distribution Agent”) and the Mestek transfer agent, a single stock certificate, endorsed by Mestek, representing all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Omega then owned by Mestek. The shares of Omega common stock represented by said certificate shall be the shares distributed to the stockholders of Mestek, pursuant to the Distribution. Mestek shall cause the Distribution Agent to distribute on the Distribution Date the appropriate number of such shares of common stock of Omega to each shareholder of Mestek as of the record date of the Distribution (June 23, 2005), or the designated transferee or transferees of such shareholder. 

3.2.     Shares Received . Subject to Sections 4.4 and 4.5, each holder of common stock of Mestek on the Record Date (or such holder’s designated transferee or transferees) will be entitled to receive in the Distribution a number of shares of common stock of Omega equal to the number of shares of common stock of Mestek held by such holder on the Record Date. The amount of shares issued and outstanding to the individual shareholders of Omega holding such shares prior to the Distribution Date shall not be increased or reduced by the Distribution.

3.3.     Obligation to Provide Information . Omega and Mestek, as the case may be, will provide to the Distribution Agent all share certificates and any information required in order to complete the Distribution on the basis specified above.

3.4.     Information Statement . Prior to the Distribution Date, Mestek and Omega shall prepare and mail, to the holders of common stock of Mestek such information concerning Omega and the Distribution and such other matters as Mestek shall reasonably determine are necessary and as may be required by law. Mestek and Omega will prepare, and Omega will, to the extent required under applicable law, file with the Securities and Exchange Commission any such documentation which Mestek and Omega determine is necessary or desirable to effectuate the Distribution, and Mestek and Omega shall each use its reasonable commercial efforts to obtain all necessary approvals from the Commission with respect thereto as soon as practicable.

3.5.     Blue Sky . Mestek and Omega shall take all such actions as may be necessary or appropriate under the securities or blue-sky laws of the United States (and any comparable laws under any foreign jurisdiction) in connection with the Distribution.

3.6.     NASDAQ Listing . Omega shall prepare and file, and shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to have approved, an application for the additional listing of the common stock of Omega to be distributed in the Distribution on the Nasdaq National Market, subject to official notice of distribution.

3.7.     Conditions . Mestek and Omega shall take all reasonable steps necessary and appropriate to cause the conditions set forth in Section 3.9 to be satisfied and to effect the Distribution on the Distribution Date. 

3.8.     Sole Discretion of Mestek . Mestek currently intends to complete the Distribution on or before August 1, 2005. Mestek shall, in its sole and absolute discretion, determine the date of the consummation of the Distribution and all terms of the Distribution, including, without limitation, the form, structure and terms of any transaction(s) and/or offering(s) to effect the Distribution and the timing of and conditions to the consummation of the Distribution. In addition, Mestek may at any time and from time to time until the completion of the Distribution, modify or change the terms of the Distribution, including, without limitation, by accelerating or delaying the timing of the consummation of all or part of the Distribution. Omega shall cooperate with Mestek in all respects to accomplish the Distribution and shall, at Mestek’s direction, promptly take any and all actions necessary or desirable to effect the Distribution, including, without limitation, the registration under the Securities Act of the common stock of Omega on an appropriate registration form or forms to be designated by Mestek. Mestek shall select any investment banker(s) and manager(s) in connection with the Distribution, as well as any financial printer, solicitation and/or exchange agent and outside counsel for Mestek; provided, however, that nothing herein shall prohibit Omega from engaging (at its own expense) its own financial, legal, accounting and other advisors in connection with the Distribution.

3.9.     Conditions Precedent to Distribution . The following are conditions that must take place prior to the consummation of the Distribution. The conditions are for the sole benefit of Mestek and shall not give rise to or create any duty on the part of Mestek or the Mestek Board of Directors to waive or not waive any such condition.

(a)     Form 10 . The Form 10 shall be effective under the Exchange Act, with no stop order in effect with respect thereto.

(b)     Tax Opinion . Mestek shall have obtained an opinion letter from Greenberg Traurig in form and substance satisfactory to Mestek (in its sole discretion), and such letter shall remain in effect as of the Distribution Date, to the effect that (i) the distribution by Mestek of all of its Omega stock to the stockholders of Mestek will qualify as a tax free transaction under Section 355 of the Code; (ii) no gain or loss will be recognized by Mestek on the distribution of the Omega common stock to the Mestek shareholders; and (iii) no gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will otherwise be included in the income of) the stockholders of Mestek upon their receipt of Omega common stock pursuant to the Distribution.

(c)     Government Approvals . Any material governmental approvals and consents necessary to consummate the Distribution, including without limit a declaration by the SEC of the effectiveness of the registration of the Omega common stock on Form 10, shall have been obtained and be in full force and effect;

(d)     Listing of Omega Stock . Omega shall have received the approval by Nasdaq or a national stock exchange for the listing of the Omega common stock on the Nasdaq National Market, or national stock exchange.

(e)     Dividends . Omega shall pay to Mestek and individual shareholders of Omega prior to the Distribution Date cash dividends aggregating approximately $___________.

(f)     No Legal Restraints . No order, injunction or decree issued by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Distribution shall be in effect and no other event outside the control of Mestek shall have occurred or failed to occur that prevents the consummation of the Distribution; and 

(g)     No Material Adverse Effect . No events or developments other than the Distribution itself shall have occurred subsequent to the Record Date that, in the judgment of the Board of Directors of Mestek, would result in the Distribution having a material adverse effect on Mestek or on the stockholders of Mestek.

(h)     Ancillary Agreements . Each Ancillary Agreement shall be duly executed and delivered and be in full force and effect.

4.     COVENANTS AND OTHER MATTERS

4.1.     Required Consent . To preserve the tax free character of the Distribution, for the two years immediately following the effective date of the Distribution Date, Omega may not issue any additional shares of its common stock in excess of the shares issued with respect to the Distribution, nor enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any Person that contemplates a transaction, which would, singly or in combination with any other issuance or transaction, result in a change in 50% or more of the direct or indirect ownership of the Omega common stock from said ownership as constituted on the Distribution Date. If the Omega Board of Directors, by a written vote or unanimous consent, determine that such issuance or transaction is in the best interest of the Omega shareholders, the Chairman of Omega may submit a request for the consent of the Mestek Board to effect such issuance or enter into such transaction. Such request shall be in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Mestek Board of Directors, setting forth the details of the proposed issuance or transaction, the benefits accruing to the Omega shareholders in connection therewith, and such assurances and security regarding the possible tax liability that could be engendered by the proposed issuance or transaction. The Mestek Board may, in its sole and absolute discretion, by resolution at a meeting duly called and held or by unanimous written consent, consent to or elect to withhold their consent to such proposed issuance or transaction. The requirement under this Section 4.1 to obtain the consent of the Mestek Board to any proposed issuance or transaction shall cease on the second anniversary of the Distribution, and shall thereafter be of no further force or effect.

4.2.     Other Agreements . Mestek and Omega agree to execute or cause to be executed by the appropriate parties and deliver, as appropriate, such other agreements, instruments and other documents as may be necessary or desirable in order to effect the purposes of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.

4.3.     Additional Transitional Services Agreements . Mestek and Omega will enter into the Transitional Services Agreement covering the provision of various transitional services by Mestek for Omega, including SEC reporting, internal auditing and financial, accounting, legal, real estate and such other services Omega may wish to obtain from Mestek. Such services will generally be provided for a fee of $__________ per year which the parties acknowledge is approximately equal to the direct costs and indirect costs of providing such services plus five percent (5.0%). The transitional services agreement will generally provide for a term of three years, or less.

4.4.     Agreement for Exchange of Information .

(a)     Generally . Each of Mestek and Omega agrees to provide, or cause to be provided, to each other, at any time before or after the Distribution Date, as soon as reasonably practicable after written request therefor, any Information in the possession or under the control of such party that the requesting party reasonably needs (i) to comply with reporting, disclosure, filing or other requirements imposed on the requesting party (including under applicable securities laws) by a Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the requesting party, (ii) for use in any other judicial, regulatory, administrative or other proceeding or in order to satisfy audit, accounting, claims, regulatory, litigation or other similar requirements, (iii) to comply with its obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (iv) in connection with the ongoing businesses of Mestek or Omega, as the case may be; provided, however, that in the event that any party determines that any such provision of Information could be commercially detrimental, violate any law or agreement, or waive any attorney-client privilege, the parties shall take all reasonable measures to permit the compliance with such obligations in a manner that avoids any such harm or consequence.

(b)     Internal Accounting Controls; Financial Information . After the Distribution Date, (i) each party shall maintain in effect at its own cost and expense adequate systems and controls for its business to the extent necessary to enable the other party to satisfy its reporting, accounting, audit and other obligations, and (ii) each party shall provide, or cause to be provided, to the other party and its Subsidiaries in such form as such requesting party shall request, at no charge to the requesting party, all financial and other data and information as the requesting party determines necessary or advisable in order to prepare its financial statements and reports or filings with any Governmental Authority.

(c)     Ownership of Information . Any Information owned by a party that is provided to a requesting party pursuant to this Section 4.4 shall be deemed to remain the property of the providing party. Unless specifically set forth herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as granting or conferring rights of license or otherwise in any such Information.

(d)     Record Retention . To facilitate the possible exchange of Information pursuant to this Section 4.4 and other provisions of this Agreement after the Distribution Date, each party agrees to use its reasonable commercial efforts to retain all Information in its respective possession or control on the Distribution Date substantially in accordance with the policies of Mestek as in effect on the Distribution Date. However, except as set forth in the Tax Sharing Agreement, at any time after the Distribution Date, each party may amend its respective record retention policies at such party’s discretion; provided, however, that if a party desires to effect the amendment within three (3) years after the Distribution Date, the amending party must give thirty (30) days prior written notice of such change in the policy to the other party to this Agreement. No party will destroy, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to destroy, any Information that exists on the Distribution Date (other than Information that is permitted to be destroyed under the current record retention policies of Mestek) and that falls under the categories listed in Section 4.4(a), without first using its reasonable commercial efforts to notify the other party of the proposed destruction and giving the other party the opportunity to take possession of such Information prior to such destruction.

(e)     Limitation of Liability . No party shall have any liability to any other party in the event that any Information exchanged or provided pursuant to this Section 4.4 is found to be inaccurate, in the absence of gross negligence or willful misconduct by the party providing such Information. No party shall have any liability to any other party if any Information is destroyed or lost after reasonable commercial efforts by such party to comply with the provisions of Section 4.4(d).

(f)     Other Agreements Providing for Exchange of Information . The rights and obligations granted under this Section 4.4 are subject to any specific limitations, qualifications or additional provisions on the sharing, exchange or confidential treatment of Information set forth in this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement.

(g)     Production of Witnesses; Records; Cooperation . After the Distribution Date, except in the case of a legal or other proceeding by one party against another party (which shall be governed by such discovery rules as may be applicable under Section 4.9 or otherwise), each party hereto shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to make available to each other party, upon written request, the former, current and future directors, officers, employees, other personnel and agents of such party as witnesses and any books, records or other documents within its control or which it otherwise has the ability to make available, to the extent that any such person (giving consideration to business demands of such directors, officers, employees, other personnel and agents) or books, records or other documents may reasonably be required in connection with any legal, administrative or other proceeding in which the requesting party may from time to time be involved, regardless of whether such legal, administrative or other proceeding is a matter with respect to which indemnification may be sought hereunder. The requesting party shall bear all costs and expenses in connection therewith.

4.5.     Auditors and Audits; Annual and Quarterly Statements and Accounting . Each party agrees that, for so long as Mestek under generally accepted accounting principles to consolidate Omega’s results of operations and financial position within Mestek’s financial statements:

(a)     Selection of Auditors . Omega shall not select a different firm of independent certified public accountants that is used by Mestek to serve as its (and its Subsidiaries’) independent auditors (“Omega’s Auditors”) for purposes of providing an opinion on its consolidated financial statements without Mestek’s prior written consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned).

(b)     Date of Auditors’ Opinion and Quarterly Reviews . Omega shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to enable the Omega Auditors to complete their audit such that they will date their opinion on Omega’s audited annual financial statements on the same date that Mestek’s independent auditors (“Mestek’s Auditors”) date their opinion on Mestek’s audited annual financial statement, and to enable Mestek to meet its timetable for the printing, filing and public dissemination of Mestek’s annual financial statements for so long as Mestek is a publicly traded company. Omega shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to enable the Omega Auditors to complete their quarterly review procedures such that they will provide clearance on Omega’s quarterly financial statements on the same date that Mestek’s Auditors provide clearance on Mestek’s quarterly financial statements.

(c)     Annual and Quarterly Financial Statements . Omega shall provide to Mestek on a timely basis all Information that Mestek reasonably requires to meet its schedule for the preparation, printing, filing, and public dissemination of Mestek’s annual and quarterly financial statements for so long as Mestek is a publicly traded company. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Omega will provide all required financial Information with respect to Omega and its Subsidiaries to Omega’s Auditors in a sufficient and reasonable time and in sufficient detail to permit Omega’s Auditors to take all steps and perform all reviews necessary to provide sufficient assistance to Mestek’s Auditors with respect to financial Information to be included or contained in Mestek’s annual and quarterly financial statements. Similarly, Mestek shall provide to Omega on a timely basis all financial Information that Omega reasonably requires to meet its schedule for the preparation, printing, filing, and public dissemination of Omega’s annual and quarterly financial statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Mestek will provide all required financial Information with respect to Mestek and its Subsidiaries to Mestek’s Auditors in a sufficient and reasonable time and in sufficient detail to permit Mestek’s Auditors to take all steps and perform all reviews necessary to provide sufficient assistance to Omega’s Auditors with respect to Information to be included or contained in Omega’s annual and quarterly financial statements.

(d)     Identity of Personnel Performing the Annual Audit and Quarterly Reviews . Omega shall authorize Omega’s Auditors to make available to Mestek’s Auditors both the personnel who performed or will perform the annual audits and quarterly reviews of Omega and work papers related to the annual audits and quarterly reviews of Omega, in all cases within a reasonable time prior to Omega’s Auditors’ opinion date, so that Mestek’s Auditors are able to perform the procedures they consider necessary to take responsibility for the work of Omega’s Auditors as it relates to Mestek’s Auditors’ report on Mestek’s financial statements, all within sufficient time to enable Mestek to meet its timetable for the printing, filing and public dissemination of Mestek’s annual and quarterly statements. Similarly, Mestek shall authorize Mestek’s Auditors to make available to Omega’s Auditors both the personnel who performed or will perform the annual audits and quarterly reviews of Mestek and work papers related to the annual audits and quarterly reviews of Mestek, in all cases within a reasonable time prior to Mestek’s Auditors’ opinion date, so that Omega’s Auditors are able to perform the procedures they consider necessary to take responsibility for the work of Mestek’s Auditors as it relates to Omega’s Auditors’ report on Omega’s statements, all within sufficient time to enable Omega to meet its timetable for the printing, filing and public dissemination of Omega’s annual and quarterly financial statements.

(e)     Access to Books and Records . Omega shall provide Mestek’s internal auditors and their designees access to Omega’s and its Subsidiaries’ books and records so that Mestek may conduct reasonable audits relating to the financial statements provided by Omega pursuant hereto as well as to the internal accounting controls and operations of Omega and its Subsidiaries. Similarly, Mestek shall provide Omega’s internal auditors and their designees access to Mestek’s and its Subsidiaries’ books and records so that Omega may conduct reasonable audits relating to the financial statements provided by Mestek pursuant hereto as well as to the internal accounting controls and operations of Mestek and its Subsidiaries

(f)     Notice of Change in Accounting Principles . Omega shall give Mestek as much prior notice as reasonably practical of any proposed determination of, or any significant changes in, its accounting estimates or accounting principles from those in effect on the Distribution Date. Omega will consult with Mestek and, if requested by Mestek, Omega will consult with Mestek’s Auditors with respect thereto. Mestek shall give Omega as much prior notice as reasonably practical of any proposed determination of, or any significant changes in, its accounting estimates or accounting principles from those in effect on the Distribution Date.

(g)     Conflict with Third-Party Agreements . Nothing in Sections 4.4 and 4.5 shall require Omega to violate any agreement with any third party regarding the confidentiality of confidential and proprietary information relating to that third party or its business; provided, however, that in the event that Omega is required under Sections 4.4 and 4.5 to disclose any such Information, Omega shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to seek to obtain such third party’s consent to the disclosure of such information.

4.6.     Consistency with Past Practices . At all times, Mestek and Omega will conduct the Omega Business before the Distribution Date in the ordinary course, consistent with past practices.

4.7.     Payment of Expenses . Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements or any other agreement between the parties relating to the Distribution, all costs and expenses of the parties hereto in connection with the Distribution shall be borne and paid by Mestek. Omega and Mestek shall each be responsible for their own internal fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Distribution.

4.8.     Governmental Approvals . To the extent that the Distribution requires any Governmental Approvals, the parties will use their reasonable commercial efforts to obtain any such Governmental Approvals.

4.9.     Dispute Resolution

(a)     Mediation . With respect to any dispute, claim or controversy between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, the parties agree that they will attempt in good faith to resolve the matter through negotiation. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the matter may be submitted to any mutually agreed-upon mediation service for mediation. Mediation shall be commenced by providing to the mediation service a joint, written request for mediation, setting forth the subject of the dispute and the relief requested. The parties will cooperate with the mediation service and with one another in selecting a neutral mediator and in scheduling the mediation proceedings. The parties covenant that they will use commercially reasonable efforts in participating in the mediation. The parties agree that the mediator’s fees and expenses and the costs incidental to the mediation will be shared equally between the parties. The parties further agree that all offers, promises, conduct and statements, whether oral or written, made in the course of the mediation by any of the parties, their agents, employees, experts and attorneys, and by the mediator and any employees of the mediation service, are confidential, privileged and inadmissible for any purpose, including impeachment, in any litigation or other proceeding involving the parties, provided that evidence that is otherwise admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible or non-discoverable as a result of its use in the mediation. Either party may commence an arbitration proceeding in accordance with Section 4.9(b) with respect to the matter submitted to mediation at any time after the completion of the initial mediation session, or ninety (90) days after the date of filing the written request for mediation, whichever occurs first.

(b)     Arbitration . Upon the prior written notice provided by Omega or Mestek to the other party pursuant to Section 4.9(a), any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, or the default hereof or thereof, which has not been resolved by mediation shall be settled by arbitration, which shall be conducted at New York, NY in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect, as modified or supplemented herein, or as the parties mutually agree otherwise. Notwithstanding the rules of the arbitral body, the Parties agree (a) that any arbitration shall be presided over by a neutral arbitrator who shall have been admitted to the practice of law, and be in good standing or on retirement status in any one of the fifty United States, (b) that the arbitrator shall base his/her decision on the facts as presented into evidence, and in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction chosen by the parties under this Agreement (or if no jurisdiction is expressly chosen, the laws of the jurisdiction in which the arbitration hearing shall be conducted), (c) that the arbitrator shall prepare a written memorandum of decision setting forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (d) in the course of performing his/her duties hereunder and in rendering his/her decision, the arbitrator shall have no power or authority to add to, delete from, or otherwise modify this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement, or any term, condition, covenant, representation, warranty, or provision contained herein or therein. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with the applicable law in any court having jurisdiction. Any claim for relief made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made within one (1) year from the date upon which the party claiming relief knew or should have known of the cause of action constituting such claim. The arbitrator or arbitrators may award monetary damages to the prevailing party only for actual damages, but may not award punitive, consequential, special or incidental damages as between the parties. Notwithstanding the above, punitive, consequential special or incidental damages may be awarded if such damages are payable to a third party.

5.     MISCELLANEOUS

5.1.     Limitation of Liability . In no event shall Mestek, its subsidiaries, and any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents, or Omega, its subsidiaries, and any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents be liable to any other member of Mestek or Omega for any special, consequential, indirect, incidental or punitive damages or lost profits, however caused and on any theory of liability (including negligence) arising in any way out of this agreement, whether or not such party has been advised of the possibility of such damages; provided, however, that the foregoing limitations shall not limit each party’s indemnification obligations for liabilities as set forth in the Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement.

5.2.     Entire Agreement . This Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the Exhibits and Schedules referenced or attached hereto and thereto, constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and shall supersede all prior written and oral and all contemporaneous oral agreements and understandings with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.

5.3.     Governing Law . This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and all Disputes hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, excluding its conflict of law rules.

5.4.     Termination . This Agreement and all Ancillary Agreements may be terminated and the Distribution abandoned at any time prior to the Distribution Date by and in the sole discretion of Mestek without the approval of Omega. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section 5.4, no party shall have any liability of any kind to the other party.

5.5.     Notices . Notices, offers, requests or other communications required or permitted to be given by either party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing to the respective parties to the following addresses:

      if to Mestek :

Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm StreetWestfield,
Massachusetts 01085Attention:
PresidentFax:
(413) 568-7428

if to Omega:

      Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery WayExton,
Pennsylvania 19341Attention:
PresidentFax:
(610) 524-7282

or to such other address as the party to whom notice is given may have previously furnished to the other in writing as provided herein. Any notice involving non-performance, termination, or renewal shall be sent by hand delivery, recognized overnight courier or, within the United States, may also be sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. All other notices may also be sent by fax, confirmed by first class mail. All notices shall be deemed to have been given and received on the earlier of actual delivery or three (3) days from the date of postmark.

5.6.     Counterparts . This Agreement, including the Ancillary Agreement and the Exhibits and Schedules hereto and thereto and the other documents referred to herein or therein, may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.

5.7.     Binding Effect; Assignment . This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives and successors, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other Person any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement. This Agreement may be enforced separately by Mestek and Omega. Neither party may assign this Agreement or any rights or obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of the other party, and any such assignment shall be void; provided, however, either party may assign this Agreement to a successor entity in conjunction with such party’s reincorporation.

5.8.     Severability . If any term or other provision of this Agreement or the Exhibits or Schedules attached hereto is determined by a court, administrative agency or arbitrator to be invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to either party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the fullest extent possible.

5.9.     Failure or Indulgence Not Waiver; Remedies Cumulative . No failure or delay on the part of either party hereto in the exercise of any right hereunder shall impair such right or be construed to be a waiver of, or acquiescence in, any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement herein, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude other or further exercise thereof or of any other right. All rights and remedies existing under this Agreement or the Exhibits or Schedules attached hereto are cumulative to, and not exclusive of, any rights or remedies otherwise available.

5.10.     Amendment . No change or amendment will be made to this Agreement or the Exhibits or Schedules attached hereto except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties to such agreement.

5.11.     Authority . Each of the parties hereto represents to the other that (a) it has the corporate or other requisite power and authority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement, (b) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by it have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate or other actions, (c) it has duly and validly executed and delivered this Agreement, and (d) this Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and general equity principles.

5.12.     Interpretation . The headings contained in this Agreement, in any Exhibit or Schedule hereto and in the table of contents to this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Any capitalized term used in any Exhibit or Schedule but not otherwise defined therein, shall have the meaning assigned to such term in this Agreement. When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article or a Section, Exhibit or Schedule, such reference shall be to an Article or Section of, or an Exhibit or Schedule to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated.

5.13.     Conflicting Agreements . In the event of conflict between this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement or other agreement executed in connection herewith, the provisions of such other agreement shall prevail.

6.     DEFINITIONS

6.1.     Governmental Approvals . “Governmental Approvals” means any notices, reports or other filings to be made, or any consents, registrations, approvals, permits or authorizations to be obtained from, any Governmental Authority.

6.2.     Governmental Authority . “Governmental Authority” shall mean any federal, state, local, foreign or international court, government, department, commission, board, bureau, agency, official or other regulatory, administrative or governmental authority.

6.3.     Information . “Information” means information, whether or not patentable or copyrightable, in written, oral, electronic or other tangible or intangible forms, stored in any medium, including studies, reports, records, books, contracts, instruments, surveys, discoveries, ideas, concepts, know-how, techniques, designs, specifications, drawings, blueprints, diagrams, models, prototypes, samples, flow charts, data, computer data, disks, diskettes, tapes, computer programs or other software, marketing plans, customer names, communications by or to attorneys (including attorney-client privileged communications), memos and other materials prepared by attorneys or under their direction (including attorney work product), and other technical, financial, employee or business information or data.

6.4.     Distribution Date . “Distribution Date” has the meaning set forth in the Section 3.1 hereof and shall be _____________, 2005.

6.5.     Omega . “Omega” means Omega, each subsidiary of Omega as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Distribution Date, and any time thereafter the Distribution Date, and each Person that becomes a Subsidiary of Omega after the Distribution Date.

6.6.     Omega’s Auditors . “Omega’s Auditors” means Omega’s independent certified public accountants.

6.7.     Person . “Person” means an individual, a partnership, a corporation, a limited liability company, an association, a joint stock company, a trust, a joint venture, an unincorporated organization and a governmental entity or any department, agency or political subdivision thereof.

6.8.     Record Date . “Record Date” means the close of business on June 23, 2005.

6.9.     Subsidiary . “Subsidiary” of any Person means a corporation or other business organization whether incorporated or unincorporated of which at least a majority of the securities or interests having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries; provided, however, that no Person that is not directly or indirectly wholly-owned by any other Person shall be a Subsidiary of such other Person unless such other Person controls, or has the right, power or ability to control, that Person.

6.10.     Mestek . “Mestek” means Mestek, each subsidiary of Mestek (other than Omega) as of the date of this Agreement and from and after the Distribution Date, and each Person that becomes a Subsidiary of Mestek after the Distribution Date.

6.11      Mestek's Auditors. "Mestek's Auditors" means Mestek's independent certified public accountants.

        WHEREFORE, the parties have signed this Separation and Distribution Agreement effective as of the date first set forth above.

MESTEK, INC.

By: ____________________________

Name:

Title:

OMEGA FLEX, INC.

By: ____________________________

Name:

Title:


EXHIBITS

Exhibit A   Certificate of Secretary of Mestek  
Exhibit B   Certificate of Secretary of Omega  
Exhibit C   Tax Sharing Agreement  
Exhibit D   Transitional Services Agreement  
Exhibit E   Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreement  
Exhibit F   Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement  

OMEGA FLEX, INC.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

1. Complying with Law

All employees, officers and directors of the Company should respect and comply with all of the laws, rules and regulations of the U.S. and other countries, and the states, counties, cities and other jurisdictions, in which the Company conducts its business or the laws, rules and regulations of which are applicable to the Company.

Such legal compliance should include, without limitation, compliance with the “insider trading” prohibitions applicable to the Company and its employees, officers and directors. Generally, employees, officers and directors who have access to or knowledge of material non-public information from or about the Company are not permitted to buy, sell or otherwise trade in the Company’s securities. This restriction extends to sharing or tipping others about such information, especially since the individuals receiving such information might utilize such information to trade in the Company’s securities. In addition, the Company has implemented trading restrictions to reduce the risk, or appearance, of insider trading. Company employees, officers and directors are directed to the Company’s Insider Trading Policy or to the Company’s Law Department if they have questions regarding the applicability of such insider trading prohibitions.

This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics does not summarize all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Company and its employees, officers and directors. Please consult the Company’s Law Department and the various guidelines which the Company has prepared on specific laws, rules and regulations.

2. Conflicts of Interest

All employees, officers and directors of the Company should be scrupulous in avoiding a conflict of interest with regard to the Company’s interests. A “conflict of interest” exists whenever an individual’s private interests interfere or conflict in any way (or even appear to interfere or conflict) with the interests of the Company. A conflict situation can arise when an employee, officer or director has personal or financial interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her Company work objectively and effectively. The acceptance, by any employee or member of his or her immediate family of any improper personal benefit from a third party who does business with the Company shall be considered a violation of this code. Loans to, or guarantees of obligations of, employees, officers and directors and their respective family members may create conflicts of interest. Federal law prohibits loans to directors and executive officers.

Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Company policy, except under guidelines approved by the Board of Directors or committees of the Board. Conflicts of interest may not always be clear-cut, so if you have a question, you should consult with higher levels of management or the Company’s Law Department. Any employee, officer or director who becomes aware of a conflict or potential conflict should bring it to the attention of a supervisor, manager or other appropriate personnel or consult the procedures described in this Code.

It is almost always a conflict of interest for a Company employee to work simultaneously for a competitor, customer or supplier. You are not allowed to work for a competitor as a consultant or board member. The best policy is to avoid any direct or indirect business connection with our customers, suppliers or competitors, except on our behalf.

3. Corporate Opportunity

Employees, officers and directors are prohibited from (a) taking for themselves personally opportunities that properly belong to the Company or are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or position; (b) using corporate property, information or position for personal gain; and (c) competing with the Company. Employees, officers and directors owe a duty to the Company to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

4. Confidentiality

Employees, officers and directors of the Company must maintain the confidentiality of confidential information entrusted to them by the Company or its suppliers or customers, except when disclosure is authorized by the Law Department or required by laws, regulations or legal proceedings. Whenever feasible, employees, officers and directors should consult the Law Department if they believe they have a legal obligation to disclose confidential information. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors of the Company, or harmful to the Company or its customers if disclosed.

5. Fair Dealing

We seek to outperform our competition fairly and honestly. We seek competitive advantage through superior performance, never through unethical or illegal business practices. Stealing proprietary information, possessing trade secret information that was obtained without the owner’s consent, or inducing such disclosures by past or present employees of other companies is prohibited.

6. Protection and Proper Use of Company Assets

All employees, officers and directors should protect the Company’s assets and ensure their efficient use. Theft, carelessness, and waste have a direct impact on the Company’s profitability. All Company assets should be used for legitimate business purposes.

7. Accounting Complaints

The Company’s policy is to comply with all applicable financial reporting and accounting regulations applicable to the Company. If any employee, officer or director of the Company has concerns or complaints regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters of the Company, then he or she is encouraged to submit those concerns or complaints (anonymously, confidentially or otherwise) to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (which will, subject to its duties arising under applicable law, regulations and legal proceedings, treat such submissions confidentially.) Such submissions may be through the toll free telephone number established for this purpose; through the compliance reporting system on the Company’s internet web page; or in writing to the attention of the Audit Committee, or any director who is a member of the Audit Committee, at the principal executive offices of the Company.

8. Reporting Any Illegal or Unethical Behavior

Employees are encouraged to talk to supervisors, managers or other appropriate personnel about observed illegal or unethical behavior and, when in doubt, about the best course of action in a particular situation. Employees, officers and directors who are concerned that violations of this Code or that other illegal or unethical conduct by employees, officers or directors of the Company have occurred or may occur should either contact their supervisor or superiors. If they do not believe it appropriate or are not comfortable approaching their supervisors or superiors about their concerns or complaints, then they may contact either the Law Department of the Company or the Audit Committee or Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. If their concerns or complaints require confidentiality, including keeping their identity anonymous, then this confidentiality will be protected, subject to applicable law, regulation or legal proceedings.

9. Gifts or Payments: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits giving anything of value, directly or indirectly to foreign government officials or foreign political candidates in order to obtain or retain business. It is strictly prohibited to make illegal payments to government officials of any country. In addition, the U.S. government has a number of laws and regulations regarding business gratuities which may be accepted by U.S. government personnel. The promise, offer or delivery to an official or employee of the U.S. government of a gift, favor or other gratuity in violation of these rules would not only violate Company policy but could also be a criminal offense. State and local governments, as well as foreign governments, may have similar rules. The Company’s Law Department can provide guidance to you in this area.

The purpose of business entertainment and gifts in a commercial setting is to create good will and sound working relationships, not to gain unfair advantage with customers. No gift or entertainment should be offered, given, provided or accepted by any Company employee, family member of an employee or agent unless it: (1) is not a cash gift, (2) is consistent with customary business practices, (3) is not excessive in value, (4) cannot be construed as a bribe or payoff and (5) does not violate any laws or regulations. Please discuss with your supervisor any gifts or proposed gifts which you are not certain are appropriate.

10. No Retaliation

The Company will not permit retaliation of any kind by or on behalf of the Company and its employees, officers and directors against good faith reports or complaints of violations of this Code or other illegal or unethical conduct.

11. Public Company Reporting; Books and Records

As a public company, it is of critical importance that the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission be accurate and timely. Depending on their position with the Company, an employee, officer or director may be called upon to provide necessary information to assure that the Company’s public reports are complete, fair and understandable. The Company expects employees, officers and directors to take this responsibility very seriously and to provide prompt accurate answers to inquiries related to the Company’s public disclosure requirements.

All of the Company’s books, records, accounts and financial statements must be maintained in reasonable detail, must appropriately reflect the Company’s transactions and must conform both to applicable legal requirements and to the Company’s system of internal controls. Unrecorded or “off the books” funds or assets should not be maintained unless permitted by applicable law or regulation.

Records should always be retained or destroyed according to the Company’s record retention policies. In accordance with those policies, in the event of litigation or governmental investigation please consult the Company’s Law Department.

12. Employment and the Work Place

Company policy prohibits all unlawful discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment; indeed, the Company has long been committed to the proposition that all employees be treated with dignity and respect. Violation of the policy may not only be illegal, but it may also violate the core values of the Company. All employees are encouraged to discuss any concerns they may have with their immediate manager, human resources personnel, or higher management, as warranted. Alternatively, such concerns may be forwarded on a confidential or anonymous basis to corporate headquarters in Westfield, Massachusetts by mail, telephone, or other systems the Company has established for the handling of confidential concerns.

13. Amendment, Modification and Waiver

This Code may be amended, modified or waived by the Board of Directors and waivers may also be granted by the Nominating & Governance Committee, subject to the disclosure and other provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules thereunder and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ National Market.

Dated:

Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries





                   Exton Ranch, Inc. Pennsylvania

                   Omega Flex Limited England

Preliminary and Subject to Completion, date [   , 2005]

INFORMATION STATEMENT

OMEGA FLEX, INC.

Omega Flex, Inc.
Common Stock
(Par Value $0.01 per share)

        This information statement is being furnished in connection with the distribution of 86% of the issued and outstanding shares of Omega Flex, Inc. common stock by Mestek, Inc. to its holders of common stock. The remaining 14% of our common stock is owned by two of the executive officers of Omega Flex, and these executive officers will retain their 14% interest in Omega Flex after the distribution.

        Shares of our common stock will be distributed to holders of Mestek common stock of record as of the close of business on June 23, 2005, which will be the record date. These shareholders will receive one share of our common stock for every one share of Mestek common stock held as of the record date. The distribution of our shares will be made in book-entry form, and physical stock certificates will be issued only upon request. The distribution will be effective at 11:59 pm Eastern time on or about ____, 2005.

        No shareholder approval of the distribution is required or sought. WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY. Mestek shareholders will not be required to pay for the shares of our common stock to be received by them in the distribution, or to surrender or to exchanges shares of Mestek common stock in order to receive our common stock or to take any other action in connection with the distribution. There is no current trading market for our common stock. However, we expect that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, for our common stock will develop on or shortly before the record date for the spin-off, and we expect “regular way” trading of our common stock will begin the first trading day after the spin-off. When-issued trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. Regular way trading refers to trading after a security has been issued and typically involves a transaction that settles on the third full business day following the date of the transaction. We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX.”

        The Board of Directors of Mestek is considering a management proposed plan to take Mestek private through a reverse stock split at a date to be determined subsequent to the distribution. The Mestek “going private” transaction is likely to be subject to a vote of the Mestek shareholders, and fully disclosed and discussed in either an information statement or a proxy statement and other documents and filings to be made by Mestek with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information statement does not discuss or deal with the proposed Mestek going-private transaction, and Mestek shareholders who have questions about the Mestek going-private transaction should refer to the above documents and filings for further information as such information becomes available.

         In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11.


Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy
any securities.


The date of this information statement is ____________, 2005,
and it is first being mailed to shareholders of Mestek, Inc.
on or about ____________, 2005.


John E. Reed,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dear Mestek Shareholder:

        I am pleased to inform you that on March 8, 2005, the Board of Directors of Mestek, Inc., approved a plan to distribute its equity interests in our subsidiary, Omega Flex, Inc., to our shareholders. This process is commonly referred to as a spin-off. Mestek shareholders will receive one share of Omega Flex common stock for each share of Mestek common stock owned as of the record date which is June 23, 2005. Mestek’s equity interests in Omega Flex constitute 86% of the outstanding common stock of Omega Flex, with the remaining shares held by two executive officers of Omega Flex.

        Following the spin-off, Omega Flex will be a public company with stock traded on the NASDAQ National Market. If you are an owner of Mestek stock on the record date, then on the effective date of the spin-off, __________, 2005, you will own shares in both Mestek and Omega Flex. Mestek common stock will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MCC.” Omega Flex has applied to have its common stock listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX.”

        Shareholder approval of the spin-off is not required, and you are not required to take any action to receive your Omega Flex common stock.

        The enclosed information statement, which is being mailed to all Mestek shareholders as of the record date, describes the distribution of shares of Omega Flex common stock in detail and contains important information, including financial statements, about Omega Flex. I suggest that you read it carefully.

        Information regarding the Mestek “going private” transaction will be discussed in other documents to be filed by Mestek with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should refer to those documents for any question you may have on the “going private” transaction.

        If you have any questions regarding the spin-off of Omega Flex common stock, please contact the transfer agent of Omega Flex, EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., 250 Royall Street, Canton, Massachusetts, 02021, (877) 282-1169, (or for shareholders inside Massachusetts, (816) 843-4299).

Sincerely,


BY: /S/ John E. Reed,
——————————————
John E. Reed,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dear Omega Flex Shareholder:

        It is my pleasure to welcome you as a shareholder of Omega Flex, Inc. We are a leading manufacturer of flexible metal hose, and we utilize our superior and proprietary technology to manufacture flexible metal hose for a number of applications, including TracPipe® flexible gas piping.

        As a separate company, Omega Flex will have the ability to focus exclusively on the growth and development of our flexible metal hose businesses, and to create value for our new shareholders. Our goals are to:

  o Continue our growth in the several markets in which we are engaged.

  o Expand our business opportunities by extrapolating our core strengths in manufacturing flexible metal hose into new applications.

  o Maintain and improve our current cost structures by effectively utilizing all of our personnel to manage and produce our products in the most cost effective manner possible.

        We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX.”

        As a shareholder in Omega Flex, Inc., you are invested in a company that is an industry leader in the manufacture of flexible metal hose, and that has a demonstrated record of successfully introducing and producing new and profitable applications for its core products. I invite you to learn more about Omega Flex and our opportunities as an independent public company in the attached information statement.

Sincerely,


BY: /S/ Kevin R. Hoben
——————————————
Kevin R. Hoben
President and Chief Executive Officer


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
SUMMARY OF THE DISTRIBUTION
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OMEGA FLEX
AND THE DISTRIBUTION
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RISK FACTORS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOING STATEMENTS 20 
DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION 20 
DIVIDEND POLICY 29 
CAPITALIZATION 30 
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 31 
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 33 
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 38 
DESCRIPTION OF OUR BUSINESS 53 
OUR MANAGEMENT 63 
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OUR COMPANY AND MESTEK, INC 76 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT 83 
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK 85 
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 88 
AVAILABLE INFORMATION 89 
OMEGA FLEX, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-1

SUMMARY

        The following is a summary of what we believe is the most important information contained in this information statement regarding our business and the distribution. For a complete understanding of our business and the distribution, we urge you to read this entire document carefully, including the risk factors, our historical and pro forma financial statements and the notes to those financial statements.

Omega Flex, Inc.

        We are a leading manufacturer of flexible metal hose, which is used in a variety of applications to carry gases and liquids within their particular applications, including carrying liquefied gases in certain processing applications, fuel gases within residential and commercial buildings, vibration absorbers in high vibration applications, and other types of gases and fluids in a number of industrial applications where the customer requires the piping to have both a degree of flexibility and/or an ability to carry corrosive compounds or mixtures, or to carry at both very high and very low (cryogenic) temperatures.

        We manufacture flexible metal hose in our facility in Exton, Pennsylvania, and sell our product through distributors, wholesalers and to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) throughout North America, and in certain European markets.

  o We are a leading manufacturer of flexible metal hose, and we utilize our superior and proprietary technology to manufacture flexible metal hose for a number of applications, including TracPipe® flexible gas piping.

  o We have a comprehensive system of distribution, using independent sales representatives to sell our products directly to customers, distributors and wholesalers operating numerous locations that distribute products to customers, OEMs, and high-volume or “national” builders and contractors, which are handled through our sales department.

  o Our products are the subject of a number of patents which have been issued both in the United States and in other countries, which give us the exclusive right during the effective period of such patents to make and sell these products to our customers.

  o The features and benefits of our products, including certain patented features and our process technologies and know-how, offer us distinct competitive advantages.

  o We have talented, experienced personnel, throughout our organization – from our research and development to our manufacturing organizations and customer support. The results from the research and development efforts permit us to use our core competency in the efficient and high quality manufacture of flexible metal hose to apply these products in other applications.

  o Our personnel have extensive experience in introducing new applications for our flexible metal tubing, including experience in obtaining required approvals from independent testing, certifying or standards agencies or organizations for these new applications.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

        The flexible metal hose industry is highly fragmented and diverse, with over 10 companies producing flexible metal hose in the United States, and at least that many in Europe, Japan and Asia. Because of its simple and ubiquitous nature, flexible metal hose can be applied and has been applied to a number of different applications across a broad range of industries.

The major market categories for flexible metallic hose include automotive, aerospace, residential and commercial construction, and general industrial. We participate in the latter two, which in the aggregate represent about 50% of the total market opportunity for flexible metallic hose. The major use of corrugated stainless steel tubing in the residential and commercial construction markets is primarily for flexible gas piping and gas appliance connectors and secondarily as pump connectors to isolate vibration in mechanical piping systems in commercial buildings. The general industrial market includes all of the processing industries, the most important of which include primary steel, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, as well as specialty applications for transfer of fluids at both extremely low and high temperatures (such as the conveying of cryogenic liquids) and a highly fragmented OEM market, as well as a maintenance and repair market.

        None of our competitors is dominant in more than one market. We are a leading supplier of flexible metal hose in each of the two broad markets which we serve.

Business Strategy

        Our strategic objectives are to develop and grow the demand and application of our products, while also improving internal margins through increased cost efficiencies in all aspects of our organization. In particular, we will continue to use our core competencies in the manufacture of flexible metal hose to provide:

  o significant value-added assemblies to our OEM industrial customers;

  o expanded distribution of our TracPipe® flexible gas piping products, both domestically and overseas, by converting the users of traditional gas piping systems (black iron pipe or copper tube) and users of competitive CSST systems to our TracPipe® products; and

  o new product offerings of flexible metal hose for new applications and new markets to grow the demand for our product and obtain higher margins in applications where we have a unique competitive position in the marketplace.


SUMMARY OF THE DISTRIBUTION

The following is a brief summary of the terms of the distribution. Please see “Description of The Distribution” on page 24 for a more detailed description of the matters described below.

Distributing company: Mestek Inc., which is a family of manufacturing companies that produce and distribute heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, and metal forming and metal processing machinery.

Distributed company: Omega Flex, which is a leading manufacturer of flexible metal hose.

Reasons for the distribution: The board of directors of Mestek has determined that the separation of Omega Flex from Mestek will enhance the success of both Mestek and Omega Flex, and thereby maximize shareholder value over the long-term for each company, by providing each company the ability to focus exclusively on maximizing opportunities for their distinct businesses. Mestek’s board of directors believes that a tax-free distribution of shares in Omega Flex offers Mestek and its shareholders the greatest long-term value and is the most tax efficient way to separate the companies. Please see “Description of the Distribution – Reasons for the Distribution” for more detailed information.

Securities to be distributed: Approximately 8,730,543 shares of our common stock. The shares of our common stock to be distributed by Mestek will constitute 86% of our common stock immediately after the distribution.

Distribution ratio: Each holder of Mestek common stock as of the record date will receive one share of our common stock for every one share of Mestek common stock held on the record date.

Method of distribution: For registered Mestek shareholders, our transfer agent will credit their share of common stock to book-entry accounts established to hold their shares of our common stock. Book-entry refers to a method of recording stock ownership in the records of our stock registrar in which no physical certificates are issued. For shareholders who own Mestek common stock through a broker or other nominee, their shares of our common stock will be credited to their accounts by the broker or other nominee. Following the distribution, shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may request the transfer of their shares of our common stock to a brokerage or other account at any time or the delivery of physical stock certificates for their shares, in each case without charge for such transfer or delivery. However, if you sell your Mestek shares after the record date and before the end of trading on the distibution date of the Omega common stock, New York Stock Exchange rules require that the right to receive the corresponding shares of Omega common stock will automatically be conveyed with the sale of your Mestek stock. See “Trading of Mestek, Inc. Common Stock between the Record Date and Distribution Date”.

Record date: The record date is the close of business on June 23, 2005.

Distribution date: 11:59 p.m. on _______________, 2005.

Stock exchange listing: Currently there is no public market for our common stock. We have applied for listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX”. We anticipate that trading will commence on a “when-issued” basis shortly before the record date. When-issued trading refers to a transaction made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. On the first trading day following the distribution date, when-issued trading in respect of our common stock will end and “regular way” trading will begin. Regular way trading refers to trading after a security has been issued and typically involves a transaction that settles on the third full business day following the date of the transaction. We cannot predict the trading prices for our common stock before or after the distribution date. In addition, Mestek’s common stock will remain outstanding and will continue to trade on the NYSE, pending the completion of Mestek’s proposed “going private” transaction described above. We cannot predict any change that may occur in the trading price of Mestek’s common stock as a result of the distribution.

Transfer agent and registrar for the shares: EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., will be the transfer agent and registrar for the shares of our common stock.

Distribution agent for the shares: EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., will be the distribution agent to distribute the shares of our common stock to all Mestek shareholders.

Settlement of intercompany receivable and payment of dividends to Mestek: Prior to or concurrently with the completion of the distribution, we intend to pay a dividend of approximately $___________ to our shareholders of record on ___________, 2005 (prior to the distribution date). The shareholders as of the dividend record date will be Mestek and two of our executive officers. The dividend will be funded by Mestek repaying a portion of the then outstanding intercompany receivable to us. We anticipate this payment will be approximately $______. We will in turn pay $______ in dividends, 86% to Mestek and 14% to two management shareholders. Even after the payment of a portion of the intercompany receivable and the dividend Mestek will still be indebted to us in an amount we estimate will be about $_______. After the effective date of the distribution, this intercompany receivable will be converted to a promissory note, payable in 3 years with interest accruing at a rate equal to the three year U.S. Treasury note yield plus 100 basis points.

Dividend policy: Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion and contractual restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends.

Anti-takeover effects: We will indemnify Mestek under a tax responsibility allocation agreement we have entered into in connection with the distribution for the tax resulting from the application of Section 355(e) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as a result of any acquisition or issuance of our stock. The possibility of this potential tax liability could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of Omega Flex. Some provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation, our bylaws and Pennsylvania law may also have the effect of making more difficult an acquisition of control of us in a transaction not approved by our board of directors. See “Relationships Between Our Company and Mestek, Inc.” and “Description of Capital Stock.”

Relationship with Mestek: After the distribution, Mestek will no longer own any shares of our common stock, and will cease to have any direct ownership interest in Omega Flex. However, due to several relationships between the two companies that existed prior to the distribution, Mestek and Omega Flex will enter into one or more agreements regarding the effects of the distribution, and the allocation of various obligations and liabilities between them. Please refer to “Relationships between Our Company and Mestek, Inc.” and “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to our Relationship with and Spin-off from Mestek”, below, for more information.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences: Mestek has structured the distribution to conform to the requirements of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code with the intention of the distribution qualifying as a tax-free event. Please refer to “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Distribution”, for additional information. Because personal circumstances are unique to each individual shareholder, you are also urged to consult your own tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the distribution to you.

Risk Factors: Omega Flex’s business is subject both to general and specific business risks relating to its operations. In addition, Omega Flex’s spin-off from Mestek presents risks relating to it being a separately traded public company as well as risks relating to the nature of the spin-off transaction itself. Please refer to the section titled “Risk Factors” on page 11 for a discussion of the various risks to our business and the value of your investment in our common stock.

Incurrence of Debt: After the distribution, we expect to enter into a lending relationship with a commercial banking institution to obtain a line of credit facility for general corporate purposes, including providing adequate cash flow, maintenance of working capital, and similar purposes. It is not expected that this line of credit facility will exceed $5,000,000, and it is expected that such credit facility would be subject to standard terms of a facility of that size and character, including financial covenants and negative covenants. We expect that we will have all or most of the credit facility available for general corporate purposes.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION

What do shareholders need to do to participate in the spin-off?

        Nothing, you are not required to take any action to receive Omega Flex common stock in the distribution, although we urge you to read this entire document carefully. No shareholder approval of the distribution is required by applicable law, and we are not seeking such shareholder approval.

Do I have to pay anything for the Omega Flex stock?

    No.        You do not have to pay anything for the Omega Flex stock you receive in the distribution. The distribution is in effect a dividend of certain property owned by Mestek to its shareholders.

Do I have to send in my Mestek stock certificate?

    No.        You do not have to do anything to receive the Omega Flex stock. If you are a Mestek shareholder as of the record date of the distribution, you will be automatically credited with share of Omega Flex common stock. However, see “Trading of Mestek, Inc. Common Stock between teh Record Date and Distribution Date” for consequences of the Sale of Mestek stock after the record date of the distribution

How much Omega Flex stock will I receive?

        You will receive one share of Omega Flex common stock for each share of Mestek stock you own as of the distribution record date. The record date for the distribution is June 23, 2005.

Will I get a stock certificate?

    No.        You will not automatically receive a paper certificate for your shares of Omega Flex common stock. Prior to the effective date of the distribution, our transfer agent will create an account for each Mestek shareholder. On the effective date of the distribution, the transfer agent will credit the shares issued to each registered shareholder to their respective accounts with the transfer agent. The transfer agent will mail to each registered shareholder a statement of the shares of Omega Flex stock held in their account. This is called a “book-entry” system. For shareholders who own Mestek stock through a broker or nominee, their shares of our common stock will be credited to their brokerage accounts by such broker or nominee. After the distribution, shareholders may request the delivery of a physical stock certificate for their shares.

Will my Mestek stock continue to be publicly traded?

    Yes.        The Mestek common stock will continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange. After the effective date of the distribution, both the Mestek common stock and the Omega Flex common stock will be publicly traded. However, as disclosed elsewhere in this information statement, the management of Mestek has proposed that Mestek engage in a “going private” transaction, where Mestek will cease to be a publicly traded stock. The “going private” transaction is not expected to be consummated until after the effective date of the distribution. Mestek will make appropriate filings giving more specific information on the “going private” transaction, and you should refer to such filings for more information on that subject.

Where can Mestek shareholders get more information?

        You should direct inquiries relating to the distribution to the transfer agent and registrar of our common stock at:

EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.,
250 Royall Street
Canton, Massachusetts 02021
(877) 282-1169
www.equiserve.com

You should direct inquiries relating to your investment in Mestek common stock to:

Mestek, Inc.
260 North Elm Street
Westfield, Massachusetts 01085
(413) 568-9571
www.mestek.com


After the distribution, you should direct inquiries relating to our common stock to:

Omega Flex, Inc.
451 Creamery Way
Exton, PA 19341
(610) 524-7272
www.omegaflex.com

Information on these websites does not constitute part of this information statement.


SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following table presents a summary of selected financial information derived from our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and unaudited financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, each of which are included elsewhere in this information statement. The historical information presented in the following table may not be indicative of the results of operations or financial position that would have been obtained if we had been an independent company during the periods shown, or of our future performance as an independent company.

        You should read the summary and unaudited pro forma financial statements in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to the audited financial statements. You should also read the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition Results of Operations.” The summary and unaudited pro forma financial statements are qualified by reference to these sections, the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements, each of which is included elsewhere in this information statement.

For the Years Ended
December 31
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
2002 2003 2004 2004 2005
(audited) (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Statement of Operations          
Net sales $34,963  $36,996  $48,165  $11,087  $13,251 
Cost of sales 18,366  18,893  23,397  5,618  6,478 
Gross profit 16,597  18,103  24,768  5,469  6,773 
Operating expenses 10,805  11,556  15,562  3,462  4,421 
Operating income before interest and taxes 5,792  6,547  9,206  2,007  2,352 
Interest income (expense) 300  335  371  80  64 
Other income net —  10  134 
Provision for income taxes 2,529  2,855  3,710  868  1,035 
Net Income $3,563  $4,037  $6,001  1,220  1,388 
Balance Sheet Data
Current assets   $24,811  $31,299  $25,435  $20,724 
Total assets   $34,432  $40,522  $34,902  $30,166 
Current liabilities   $  8,497  $12,840  $  7,607  $  8,734 
Total liabilities   $8,800  $16,522  $7,910  $12,666 
Minority Interest   13  15  14 
Total shareholders' equity   $25,619  $23,996* $26,977  $17,486**
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity   $34,432  $40,522  $34,902  $30,166 

*Reflects payment of intercompany dividend to Mestek of $7,740,000 (86% of $9,000,000) in October 2004.

**Reflects payment of intercompany dividend to Mestek of $8,041,000 (86% of $9,350,000) in January 2005.


RISK FACTORS

        You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all the other information contained in this information statement in evaluating our business and our common stock.

Risk Relating to Our Business

Certain of our competitors may have greater resources, or they may acquire greater resources.

        Some of our competitors have substantially more resources than are available to us as a stand-alone company. For example, in the corrugated stainless steel tubing market, two of our competitors are divisions of large corporations with revenues measured in the billions of dollars. These competitors may be able to devote substantially greater resources to the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of the products than would be available to us as a stand-alone company. One or more competitors may acquire several other competitors, or may be acquired by a larger entity, and through a combination of resources be able to devote additional resources to their businesses. These additional resources could be devoted to product development, reduced costs in an effort to obtain market share, greater flexibility in terms of profit margin as part of a larger business organization, increased investment in plant, machinery, distribution and sales concessions. As a stand-alone company, the resources that may be devoted by us to meet any potential developments by larger, well-financed competitors may be limited.

We are dependent on certain raw materials and supplies that could be subject to volatile price escalation.

        As a manufacturer of flexible metal hose, we must use certain raw materials in the manufacture of the hose. The primary raw material is stainless steel that is used in the forming of the hose, and various other steel products used in the wire braid overlay over some flexible metal hoses for additional strength and durability. We also use polyethylene in pellet form for the forming and extrusion of polyethylene jacket over corrugated stainless steel tubing for use in fuel gas applications, underground installations, and other installations that require that the metal hose be isolated from the environment. Finally, we also purchase our proprietary brass fittings used with the flexible metal hose that provide a mechanical means of attaching the hose to an assembly or junction. We attempt to limit the effects of volatile raw material prices by committing to annual purchase contracts for the bulk of our steel and polyethylene requirements, and for our requirements for fittings. We also have qualified several vendors to produce or manufacture our critical purchase requirements. However, there is no assurance that these precautions would eliminate all or most of the adverse effects of a sudden increase in the cost of materials or key components, or that the loss of one or more of our sources would not lead to higher costs because of less competition.

We face intense competition in all of our markets.

        The markets for flexible metal hose are intensely competitive. There are a number of competitors in all markets in which we operate, and generally none of these markets has one dominant competitor – rather a large number of competitors exist, each having a proportion of the total market. One or more of our competitors may develop technologies and products that are more effective or which may cost less than our current or future products, or could potentially render our products noncompetitive or obsolete. Our prior success has been due to our ability to establish and maintain an effective distribution network which to some extent came at the expense of several competing manufacturers. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not be able to disrupt our distribution network by causing one or more of our sales representatives to drop our product lines. Similarly, due to the advantages of our proprietary manufacturing process, we believe we are one of the lowest cost producers of a majority of our products, and we take numerous precautions to protect our trade secrets and prevent our unique capabilities from being disclosed. However, as disclosed in “Description of Our Business – Legal Proceedings,” we are currently engaged in two litigation matters to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets. There can be no assurance we will be successful in current or future litigation with respect to our trade secrets and proprietary manufacturing process.

We may not retain our independent sales representatives, distributors and wholesalers.

        Almost all of our products and all of product lines are sold by outside sales organizations. These independent sales organizations include sales representatives, distributors and wholesalers, and generally are geographically dispersed in certain territorial markets across the United States, Canada and elsewhere. These outside sales organizations are independent of us, and are typically owned by the individual principals of such firms. We enter into agreements with such outside sales organizations for the exclusive representation or distribution of our products, but such agreements are generally for terms of one year or less. At the expiration of the agreement, the agent or distributor may elect to represent a different manufacturer. As a result, we have no ability to control which flexible metal hose manufacturer any such sales organization may represent or carry. The competition to retain quality outside sales organizations is also intense between manufacturers of flexible metal hose since it is these sales organizations that generally can direct the sales volume to distributors and, ultimately, contractors and installers in important markets across the country, and in other countries in which we operate. The failure to obtain the best outside sales organization within a particular geographic market can limit our ability to generate sales of our products. In addition, our relationships with such sales representatives, distributors and wholesalers were initiated while we were a subsidiary of Mestek, and the establishment of these relationships may have benefited from our association with Mestek. While we currently have a fully developed sales and distribution network of superior outside sales organizations, there can be no assurance that any one or more of the outside sales organizations will elect to remain with us.

Our manufacturing plant may be damaged or destroyed.

        All of our manufacturing capacity is located in our facility in Exton, Pennsylvania. We do not have any other manufacturing capacity for flexible metal hose, and we cannot replicate our manufacturing methods at a supplier’s facility due to the confidential and proprietary nature of our manufacturing process. If the manufacturing portion of the Exton facility were destroyed or damaged in a significant manner, we would not be able to manufacture our flexible metal hose without delay or interruption. This could lead to a reduction in sales volume if customers were to purchase their requirements from our competitors, claims for breach of contract by certain customers with contracts for delivery of flexible metal hose by a certain date, and costs to replace our destroyed or damaged manufacturing capacity. The impact of any possible damage or destruction of our manufacturing facility may be offset to some extent by proceeds from our business interruption insurance policies. The fittings and accessories for the flexible metal hose are manufactured for us by several suppliers not located in Exton, Pennsylvania.

Our historical financial information may not be indicative of our future results as an independent company.

        The historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement may not reflect what our results of operations, financial position and cash flows would have been had we been a separate publicly traded company during the periods presented and may not be indicative of our future results of operations, financial position and cash flows. We believe there are a number of reasons for this:

  o as a subsidiary of Mestek, we received various services from Mestek and from outside vendors, and Mestek allocated expenses for these services and allocated a corporate charge to us. The amounts we paid for these services may be more or less than the amounts that would have been incurred had we performed or acquired these services ourselves or that we will incur as a separate company;

  o we have entered into agreements with Mestek that may be less favorable to us than either our previous arrangements with Mestek or what we could have obtained in arm’s length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties for similar services. See “Relationships Between Our Company and Mestek, Inc.”;

  o our historical financial information does not reflect certain significant events and changes that will occur as a result of our spin-off from Mestek, including, the establishment of our capital structure, the incurrence of commercial bank debt and interest expense and changes in our expenses as a result of new treasury, employee benefit, tax and other functions we will assume; and

  o the assumptions underlying our unaudited pro forma financial statements may not reflect all possible one-time or ongoing incremental expenses we may incur and our estimates of these expenses where included in the unaudited pro forma financial statements may prove to be inaccurate.

        For a further discussion of our financial information, see “Selected Historical Financial and Operating Data” and “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.”

We are primarily dependant on one product line for most of our sales.

        As indicated elsewhere in this information statement, most of our sales are derived from the sale of TracPipe® flexible gas piping and its accessories, including Autoflare® fittings. Sales of our flexible metal hose for other applications represent a small portion of our overall sales and income. Any event or circumstance that adversely affects our TracPipe® flexible gas piping could have a greater impact on our business and financial results than if our business were more evenly distributed across several different product lines. The effects of such an adverse event or circumstance would be magnified in terms of our company as a whole as compared to one or more competitors whose product lines may be more diversified, or who are not as reliant on the sales generated by their respective flexible gas piping products. Therefore, risks relating to our TracPipe® flexible gas piping business – in particular loss of distributors or sales channels, technological changes, changes in applicable code requirements, loss of our key personnel involved in the TracPipe® flexible gas piping product line, increases in commodity prices, particularly in stainless steel and polyethylene – could pose a significant risk to our company and it businesses.

We are dependant on certain sales channels for a significant portion of our business.

        Of the various sales channels that we use to sell our TracPipe® flexible gas piping, a significant portion of such sales are made through our wholesale stocking distributors that include Ferguson Enterprises and several other distributors. These and other distributors purchase our TracPipe® flexible gas piping product and accessories, and stock the products in warehouses for resale, either to their own local branches or to end users. Because of the breadth and penetration of the distribution networks, and the range of complementary products they offer for sale, these wholesale distributors are able to sell large amounts of our TracPipe® flexible gas piping products to end users across the United States and Canada. The decision by a major wholesaler distributor to stop distributing our TracPipe® product, and to distribute a competitive flexible gas piping product could significantly affect our revenues and possibly our earnings unless management took steps to replace such sales channel or otherwise act to maintain our margins.

We do not have a recent record of operating as an independent company and our historical financial information may not be indicative of our future results as an independent company.

        We previously operated as an independent company from 1975 to 1996, when we were acquired by Mestek. At the time of the acquisition, we were a small privately held company, and our revenues were no more than $7 million annually. While we were a part of Mestek, we operated as a part of its broader corporate organization, which provided various corporate services to us as part of the management fee charged by Mestek which we approved. Such corporate services including strategic corporate planning, legal services, finance services, insurance administration and coverage, tax accounting and planning, human resources and benefit plan sharing, environmental, health & safety services, and access to the Mestek credit facilities with Bank of America and its predecessors. Following the distribution, we anticipate that we will enter into one or more agreements with Mestek for the provision of certain corporate services. However, we may not be able to consummate such an agreement with Mestek, or even if an agreement were reached, it may expire or be terminated at some point in the future. In those events, we would be required to obtain such services for us to operate our business and comply with the various legal and regulatory regimes applicable to our business. We may not be able to obtain all or some of these services, or the costs of such services may be more than the costs of the services we previously obtained from Mestek. Either the inability to obtain such services, or the additional costs we may be forced to bear to obtain these services, could have a negative effect on our operations and on our profitability.

We may substantially increase our debt in the future.

        As of the distribution, we will be carrying approximately $3 million of debt relating to the purchase of our main facility in Exton, Pennsylvania. However, after the distribution, we will not be able to utilize the credit facility established by Mestek with Bank of America and several participating banks. We expect that it may be necessary for us to obtain our own separate credit facility with a bank or financial institution to provide funds for purposes of working capital, capital purchases, research and development, potential acquisitions and business development. However, because of our cash flow position, we do not expect that we will have any immediate need after the distribution to use our proposed $5 million credit facility. Interest costs associated with any such borrowings under such a separate credit facility may adversely affect our profitability. In establishing such a credit facility, we may also incur fees and expenses, including bank and attorneys’ fees. Further, the terms on which amounts may be borrowed – including standard financial covenants regarding the maintenance of financial ratios and the prohibition against engaging in major corporate transactions or reorganizations and the payment of dividends – may impose additional constraints on our business operations and our financial strength.

Our business may be subject to the supply and availability of fuel gas supplies.

        Our TracPipe® flexible gas piping products are used to convey fuel gas, primarily natural gas, but also propane, within a building from the exterior wall of the building to any gas-fired appliances within the building. Because the TracPipe® product is used in the transmission of fuel gas, the application of the product is limited to geographic areas where such fuel gas is available. Certain geographic areas of the United States and other countries do not have the infrastructure to make natural gas available. Other types of fuel gas may be used in areas where there are no natural gas pipe lines, but these alternate fuel gas sources have other distribution issues that may constrict their availability. Our prospects for future growth of the TracPipe® product are largely limited to those areas that have natural gas transmission lines available for use in residences and commercial buildings.

Our business may be subject to varying demands based on market interest rates.

Our TracPipe® flexible gas piping is used in the construction industry, both in residential, commercial and industrial segments, for the piping of fuel gas within a building. The demand for new or remodeled construction in the construction industry – and in particular the residential construction industry – is susceptible to fluctuations in interest rates charged by banks and other financial institutions. The purchasers of new or remodeled construction generally finance the construction or acquisition of the residential, commercial or industrial buildings, and any increase in the interest rates on such financing will raise the acquisition cost of the potential purchaser. As costs increase, an increasing number of potential buyers may not be able to support the level of financing under a higher interest rate environment. Increased acquisition costs may lead to a decline in the demand for new or remodeled construction, and as a result may also lead to a reduced demand for our products used in construction industry.

If we are not able to protect our intellectual property rights, we may not be able to compete as effectively.

        We possess a wide array of intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and applications for the above, as well trade secrets, manufacturing know-how, and other proprietary information. Certain of these intellectual property rights form the basis of our competitive advantage in the market place through a superior product design, a superior business process, superior manufacturing methods or other features that provide an advantage over our competitors. The intellectual property rights are sometimes subject to infringement or misappropriation by other organizations, and failing an amiable resolution, we may be forced to resort to legal proceedings to protect our rights in such intellectual property.

        We are currently engaged in two separate civil cases to protect our intellectual property rights. In one case currently pending in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, we have sued a flexible gas pipe competitor for infringement on one or more of our U.S. patents covering our AutoFlare® fittings used to connect the ends of the flexible gas piping. In another case pending in the Court of Common Pleas in Chester County, Pennsylvania, we have sued a former employee and a flexible metal hose competitor to enjoin the disclosure of our trade secrets covering our proprietary rotary manufacturing process. Both cases are currently pending in their respective venues. The results we may obtain from resorting to any such legal proceedings are never assured, and it is possible that an adverse decision may be delivered in any particular proceeding. As a result, we may not be able to retain the exclusive rights to utilize and practice such intellectual property rights, and one or more of our competitors could utilize and practice such intellectual property rights. This development may lessen our competitive advantage vis-à-vis one or more competitors, and lead to a reduction in sales volume in one or more product lines, a reduction in profit margin in such product lines, or both. See “Description of Our Business – Legal Proceedings” for a more detailed description of the above described litigation.

If we were to lose the services of one or more of our senior management team, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.

        Our future success depends in a large part upon the continued service of key members of our senior management team. In particular, our President, Kevin R. Hoben, and our Senior Vice President, Mark F. Albino, are critical to our overall management, as well as the development of our products and our strategic direction. Both Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino provide critical leadership and direction to our company especially in terms of market developments and new product applications, and other areas, and their unique abilities, experience and expertise cannot be easily duplicated or replaced. As we continue to grow, however, our entire management team becomes more attuned to the strategic vision created by our senior management. We do not maintain any key-person life insurance policies. The loss of any of our senior management could seriously harm our business.

Our business may be subject to cyclical demands.

        The demand for our products may be subject to cyclical demands in the markets in which we operate. Our customers who use our products in industrial and commercial applications are generally manufacturing capital equipment for their customers. Similarly, our TracPipe® flexible gas piping products are used primarily in residential construction, both in single family buildings, and in larger multi-unit buildings. TracPipe® flexible gas piping is considered to be a relatively new product and is displacing black iron pipe at a steady rate. Should there be any change in factors that affect the rate of new residential construction, our growth rate would no longer be augmented by the recent historical increases in new residential construction. To the extent that interest rates increase, in conjunction with an economic cycle or as part of the general economic conditions in the United States or abroad, the demand for our products in such applications may well decrease as well.

Our business may be subject to seasonal or weather related factors.

        The demand for our products may be affected by factors relating to seasonal demand for the product, or a decline in demand due to inclement weather. Some of our corrugated stainless steel tubing used in fuel gas applications is installed in new or remodeled buildings, including homes, apartment buildings, office buildings, warehouses, and other commercial or industrial buildings. Generally, the rate of new or remodeled buildings in the United States and in the other geographic markets in which we are present decline in the winter months due to the inability to dig foundations, problems at the job site relating to snow, or generally due to low temperatures and stormy weather. As the rate of construction activity declines during the winter, the demand for our corrugated stainless steel tubing may also decrease or remain static. The decreases that may be inflicted due to seasonality and poor weather may be offset somewhat by the increase in the use of corrugated stainless steel tubing from contractors who previously used only the traditional black iron pipe. However, the market share for corrugated stainless steel tubing in the fuel gas application within the construction industry may reach a finite point, and there can be no assurance that the decline in demand for our products or a decline in the growth of our products will not occur.

Our business could suffer if our systems and infrastructure are inadequate or we cannot replace the other benefits previously provided by Mestek.

        Since Mestek acquired us in 1996, we have relied on it for various services which we have only recently developed for ourselves, including:

  o legal

  o treasury

  o tax

  o employee benefits

  o insurance

  o investor relations

  o executive oversight and other services.

        Following the distribution, we will operate as a separate publicly traded company. We have developed and implemented systems and infrastructure to support our current and future business, and our responsibilities as a public company. However, these systems and infrastructure may be inadequate and we may be required to develop or otherwise acquire other systems and infrastructure, or to obtain certain corporate services from Mestek, to support our current and future business.

After the distribution, we will not be able to obtain financing from Mestek.

        Our plans to expand our business and to continue to improve our products may require funds in excess of our cash flow and may require us to seek financing from third parties. In the past, Mestek has provided capital for our general corporate purposes, and we have periodically used cash on a short-term basis from Mestek to fund our operations. After the distribution, Mestek will not provide funds to finance our operations. Without the opportunity to obtain financing from Mestek, we may in the future need to obtain additional financing from banks, or through public offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities, strategic relationships or other arrangements. We intend to obtain a line of credit facility of not more than $5 million for general corporate borrowing, including maintaining adequate cash flow, working capital and similar purposes. The terms, interest rates, costs and fees of the new line of credit facility may not be as favorable as those historically enjoyed by Mestek. For example, Mestek did not charge us with any fees or costs for the intercompany borrowing, nor were there any covenants regarding financial ratios or prohibition on certain transactions in the loan arrangement with Mestek. We do expect to be subject to such fees, costs and covenants in some form under the new line of credit facility. Our inability to obtain financing on favorable terms could restrict our operations and reduce our profitability. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We are subject to litigation, which could result in substantial judgment or settlement costs.

        The Company is a defendant in a purported class action captioned Berry, et al. v. Titeflex Corp., et al., pending in the Clark County Circuit Court, in Arkansas, alleging, among other things, that our corrugated stainless steel tubing product TracPipe®, and similar products manufactured by several other manufacturers (also named as defendants in the case) is defective, or that instructions, warnings and training in the installation of corrugated stainless steel tubing are defective, against potential damage to the corrugated stainless steel tubing systems and the structures served by these systems, caused by the nearby lightning strikes. The defense of this lawsuit may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business. While we believe that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and are defending the matter vigorously, an adverse determination or a substantial settlement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or future prospects. “See Business — Legal Proceedings” for a more detailed description of the litigation.

Risks Relating to Our Relationship with and Spin-Off from Mestek

The agreements we are entering into with Mestek in connection with the distribution could restrict our operations.

        In connection with the distribution, we and Mestek are entering into a number of agreements that will govern our spin-off from Mestek and our future relationship. Each of these agreements has been or will be entered into in the context of our relationship to Mestek as a subsidiary and our spin-off from Mestek and, accordingly, the terms and provisions of these agreements may be less favorable to us than terms and provisions we could have obtained in arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties. These agreements commit us to take actions, observe commitments and accept terms and conditions that are or may be advantageous to Mestek but are or may be disadvantageous to us. The terms of these agreements will include obligations and restrictive provisions, including, but not limited to:

  o an agreement to indemnify Mestek, its affiliates, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives from certain liabilities arising out of some of the litigation we are involved in and all liabilities that arise from our breach of, or performance under, the agreements we are entering into with Mestek in connection with the distribution and for any of our liabilities;

  o an agreement with regard to tax matters between ourselves and Mestek which restricts our ability to engage in certain strategic or capital raising transactions.

        For a further discussion of our agreements with Mestek, see “Relationships Between Our Company and Mestek, Inc. – Agreements Between Us and Mestek.”

Risks Relating to the Distribution

If the spin-off is determined to be a taxable transaction, you and Mestek could be subject to material amounts of taxes.

        Mestek and its Board of Directors have structured the distribution to qualify as a tax-free distribution to its shareholders under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If the IRS determines that the distribution does not qualify as a tax free transaction because of its structure, alleged lack of business purpose, or subsequent acquisitions or issuance of 50% or more of our common stock, you and Mestek could be subject to material amounts of taxes. See “The Distribution – U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution.”

Under some circumstances, we could be prevented from engaging in strategic or capital raising transactions and we could be liable to Mestek for any resulting adverse tax consequences.

        It is possible that Mestek could recognize a large taxable gain if the IRS were to assert that the distribution is part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant to which one or more persons acquire, directly or indirectly, stock representing a 50% or greater interest in either Mestek or Omega Flex. Any cumulative 50% change of ownership in either Mestek or Omega Flex within the four-year period beginning two years before the date of the spin-off will be presumed under applicable law to be part of such a plan. If this presumption applies, it would need to be rebutted to avoid a large taxable gain. A merger, recapitalization or acquisition, or issuance or redemption of our common stock after the spin-off could, in some circumstances, be counted toward the 50% change of ownership threshold. As a result, we may be unable to engage in strategic or capital raising transactions that shareholders might consider favorable, or to structure potential transactions in the manner most favorable to us. Further, our tax responsibility allocation agreement with Mestek precludes us from engaging in some of these transactions and requires us to indemnify Mestek for the adverse tax consequences resulting from these types of transactions.

Certain adverse tax consequences could arise by reason of the distribution.

        It is possible that our shareholders could recognize a taxable gain if the IRS were to assert that the distribution was without sufficient business purposes to Omega Flex. This would have adverse consequences to Mestek, which may then have to recognize a taxable capital gain on the difference between the fair market value of the 86% interest in Omega Flex it is distributing to its shareholders and Mestek’s tax basis in its Omega Flex stock. Furthermore, if the IRS successfully challenges the tax-free status of the distribution, those Mestek shareholders who receive Omega Flex stock in the distribution may suffer adverse tax consequences resulting from the characterization of the distribution as a taxable dividend to such shareholders. See “The Distribution – U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution.”

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our common stock has no prior public market and we cannot predict the price range in which it will trade or its volatility after the distribution.

        There has been no prior trading market for our common stock. There can be no assurance as to the price at which our common stock will trade. The securities of many companies have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations in recent years, often unrelated to the companies’ operating performance. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether the market price of our common stock will be volatile.

        The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly as a result of many factors related to the economy in general or the flexible hose manufacturing industry in which we operate, including the following:

  o economic and stock market conditions generally and specifically as they may effect our industry;

  o earnings and other announcements by our competitors, and changes in the market's perception of our industry in general; and

  o changes in business or regulatory conditions affecting our industry.

        In addition, there are various factors related to our business in particular that could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate, including the following:

  o the size and timing of significant contract signings;

  o the non-renewal or termination of significant customer contracts; o announcement or implementation by us or our competitors of innovations or new products and services;

  o the introduction by competitors of new products that make our products obsolete or less valuable;

  o litigation judgments or settlements;

  o our earnings and results of operations and other developments affecting our business;

  o changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts that follow our stock; and

  o trading volume of our common stock.

        It is possible that our quarterly revenues and operating results may vary significantly in the future and that period-to-period comparisons of our revenues and operating results are not necessarily meaningful indicators of the future. You should not rely on the results of one quarter as an indication of our future performance. It is also possible that in some future quarters, our revenues and operating results will fall below our expectations or the expectations of market analysts and investors. If we do not meet these expectations, the price of our common stock may decline significantly.

The concentration of ownership of our common stock may depress its market price.

        Approximately 69% of the issued and outstanding common stock is owned or controlled by four shareholders; John E. Reed, Stewart B. Reed, Kevin R. Hoben and Mark F. Albino. All of these shareholders are also our directors, and Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino are also our officers. As a result, the shares held by these persons may be subject to certain restrictions on the transfer or sale of their shares, either under the restrictions relating to the maintenance of the distribution as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code, or under Rule 144. Further, there is no indication that even without such restrictions, any one or more of the above shareholders would be inclined to sell their shares of our common stock on the listed national stock exchange. In such event, the inactivity of a large block of our common shares in the marketplace may have the tendency of reducing the volume of trading of the common stock on the NASDAQ National Market, and which may also result in lower prices for the common stock because there is not a sufficient supply of shares to create a vibrant market for our shares on the NASDAQ National Market.

Our charter documents or agreements may delay or prevent a change in control.

        The terms of the distribution from Mestek and the anti-takeover provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, and the provisions of Pennsylvania law, could delay or prevent a change in control that may be favored by some of our shareholders. The provisions include without limitation a staggered board of directors, elimination of cumulative voting, requiring that only the Board may call a special shareholder meeting at which a fundamental transaction could be authorized, and the requirement of a super majority to approve certain changes to our articles of incorporate or by-laws. See “Description of Capital Stock” and “Anti-Takeover Provisions.” Any one or more acquisitions or issuance of our capital stock representing 50% or more of our then outstanding capital stock that may be related to the distribution could cause the distribution to be a taxable transaction to Mestek. As mentioned previously, any sale or issuance of shares within two years before or after the distribution are presumed to be a part of the distribution, unless we can rebut the presumption. We have agreed to indemnify Mestek for any tax that may be assessed due to actions by us that cause the distribution not to qualify as a tax-free transaction. Therefore, we have also agreed with Mestek that for a period of two years following the effective date of the distribution, we must obtain the approval of the Mestek Board of Directors before engaging in specified transactions that may involve the acquisition of our common stock or the issuance of our stock. These obligations may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of us or to effect a transaction that may otherwise be in the best interests of our shareholders.


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Certain statements in this information statement that are not historical facts — but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events — constitute forward-looking statements. The words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intend,” “estimate,” “potential,” “continue,” “hopes,” “likely,” “will,” and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms, identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Omega Flex, or industry results, to differ materially from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

        Important factors that might cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements are contained in “Risk Factors” on page 11 and elsewhere in this report and our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s view only as of the date of this information statement. We undertake no obligation to update the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, conditions or circumstances.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION

General

        Given the evolution of the distinct and highly competitive environments in which Mestek and Omega Flex operate, Mestek believes the best way to enhance the success and maximize shareholder value of both businesses over the long term is to enable each one to pursue its unique and focused strategy. After the distribution, Mestek will continue to focus on the HVAC and metal forming/metal processing businesses and Omega Flex will continue to focus on the flexible metal hose business.

        The separation of Omega Flex from Mestek will be accomplished through a pro rata distribution of the 86% percent of the common stock of Omega Flex held by Mestek to Mestek shareholders, which we refer to as the distribution, or the spin-off, which is expected to occur on [ ] [ ], 2005, the distribution date. As a result of the distribution, each Mestek shareholder will:

  o receive one share of our common stock for every one share of Mestek common stock they own, and

  o retain their shares Mestek.

Manner of Effecting the Distribution

        The general terms and conditions relating to the distribution will be set forth in a separation and distribution agreement between Mestek and us. Under that agreement, the distribution will be effective at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the distribution date, [ ] [ ], 2005. The board of directors of Mestek approved the distribution at a meeting of the board on March 8, 2005. To effect the distribution, we, acting pursuant to a unanimous written consent of our shareholders and pursuant to a vote of our board of directors, amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock to 20,000,000 shares, and authorized a split of our common stock at a ratio of 1 to 10,151.794. Following the share split, each share of our common stock prior to the distribution will be converted into 10,151.794 shares of our common stock. This ratio reflects all options exercised by Mestek officers prior to the record date of the distribution for the purchase of Mestek common stock. Fractional shares are not authorized by our articles of incorporation and no fractional shares will be issued as a result of the share split. As a result of the distribution, each Mestek shareholder of record will receive one share of our common stock for every one share of Mestek common stock owned by such shareholders as of the record date of the distribution. In order to be entitled to receive shares of our common stock in the distribution, Mestek shareholders must be shareholders at the close of business of the NYSE on the record date, June 23, 2005. For registered Mestek shareholders, our transfer agent will credit their shares of our common stock to book-entry accounts established to hold their shares of our common stock. Our distribution agent will send these shareholders a statement reflecting their ownership of our common stock. Book-entry refers to a method of recording stock ownership in our records in which no physical certificates are issued. For shareholders who own Mestek common stock through a broker or other nominee, their shares of our common stock will be credited to their accounts by the broker or other nominee. Each share of our common stock that is distributed will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable and free of preemptive rights. See “Description of Capital Stock.” Following the distribution, shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may request the transfer of their shares of our common stock to a brokerage or other account at any time as well as the delivery of physical stock certificates for their shares, in each case without charge for such transfer or delivery.

        Mestek shareholders will NOT be required to pay for shares of our common stock received in the distribution or to surrender or exchange shares of Mestek common stock in order to receive our common stock or to take any other action in connection with the distribution. No vote of Mestek shareholders is required or sought in connection with the distribution, and Mestek shareholders have no appraisal rights in connection with the distribution.

Trading of Mestek, Inc. Common Stock between the Record Date and Distribution Date

        In accordance with the trading rules of the New York Stock Exchange, if you own shares of Mestek, Inc. common stock at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the record daye (June 23, 2005) and sell those shares prior to the end of trading on the distribution date of the Omega Flex shares, you will also be selling the shares of Omega Flex common stock that would have been distributed to you pursuant to the distriution. The shares of Omega Flex common stock distributed with respect to such shares will be automatically routed and delivered by the clearing broker to the purchaser of such shares.

Reasons for the Distribution

        Mestek’s board of directors has determined that separating Omega Flex from Mestek’s other businesses in the form of a tax-free distribution to Mestek shareholders of our new publicly traded common stock is appropriate and advisable for Mestek and its shareholders. Mestek’s board of directors believes that our separation from Mestek will provide both companies with the opportunity to focus exclusively on their respective businesses and their unique opportunities for long-term growth and profitability. In addition, the separation will enable each company to enhance its strategic, financial and operational flexibility.

        The key benefits of the separation include:

Sharper Strategic Focus; Allocation of Capital Resources

        Both we and Mestek anticipate that the separation will allow each company to focus exclusively on the unique opportunities facing its respective business. For many years, our business has operated within Mestek’s broadly diversified manufacturing business. As part of Mestek, our business was required to compete for product development funds, capital improvement funds, and other investment resources with Mestek’s other major businesses. Furthermore, these competing businesses within Mestek may have pursued different strategies from our own market strategies, or Mestek may have elected to advance the interests of some of its other HVAC businesses in preference to or in conflict with the interests of our business. As separate entities, both we and Mestek can use our respective resources to invest in opportunities targeted to each of our distinct strategies and markets. In addition, each company can devote more management time and attention toward meeting the unique needs of its respective customers. We believe this focused approach will allow each management team to make decisions more quickly and efficiently.

Flexibility to Pursue Independent Strategies

        As a separate company, we will have greater flexibility to expand on our leadership position in the flexible metal hose and accessory industry by being more independent of Mestek corporate constraints, i.e., having to solicit parent approval for major initiatives, especially those involving capital expenditure, and having to conform to a variety of Mestek policies including benefits, accounting, information technology protocols, bonus criteria and salary administration. As a separate company, we will be better positioned to focus on our strategic growth initiatives.

Targeted Incentives for Employees

        As an independent company, we will have the opportunity to reward employees using equity-based compensation plans that align the incentives of management and employees with the overall financial performance of our business. The results of our business will no longer be impacted by Mestek’s other businesses, thus creating greater incentives for employees whose stock ownership will be more directly tied to our performance. The impact of this form of incentive system on our performance is expected to grow as management and employee ownership increases through the use of stock options and participation in other equity incentive programs.

Direct Access to Capital

        Historically, our ability to access capital was constrained by Mestek’s larger strategic priorities. Operating as a separate publicly traded company, we will have direct access to the capital markets. In addition, we will have the option to use our own equity as acquisition currency should the appropriate strategic opportunities arise.


Greater Market Recognition of Omega Flex Value

        Since the commencement of Omega Flex’s TracPipe® flexible gas piping business in 1996, Omega Flex has witnessed tremendous growth in market penetration and market share, and increased revenues, so that it presently is an industry leader in the flexible gas piping market in the United States. That growth in the TracPipe® business may have been obscured by the overall financial results of Mestek in the intervening years. By becoming a public company, Omega Flex will have a greater visibility in the equity markets through a simpler business model and more visible financial reporting results. This greater visibility could lead to a greater valuation of the Omega Flex than may be currently accorded to it as part of Mestek. Also, the board of directors of Mestek is considering taking Mestek private by implementing a reverse stock split. The proposed “going private” transaction would have the effect of redeeming all shareholders accounts holding less than _____ shares of Mestek common stock, and paying those shareholders the consideration proposed as part of the “going private” transaction. The Mestek board of directors believes that Omega Flex can take better advantage of the opportunities of being a public company than Mestek, with a better justification of the costs and burdens of being a public company (which Mestek will continue to incur if it remains a public company). By causing the spin-off of Omega Flex from Mestek prior to Mestek “going private”, the Mestek board of directors is enabling all of the Mestek shareholders, as of the record date of the distribution, to participate in the ownership in a public company. The distribution is a method of providing all Mestek shareholders, both those who continue with Mestek, and those who have their Mestek shares redeemed under the going private transaction, to have a portion of their prior investment in Mestek continue to be publicly traded on a national market, in the form of Omega Flex, with the option to participate in the opportunity posed by Omega Flex, or to liquidate their investment at a time and place of their own choosing.

Use of Omega Flex Stock for Acquisitions

        While the growth of the Omega Flex business has since 1996 been a result of new product development and innovation that has been accomplished almost exclusively through the internal resources of Omega Flex, in the future, there may be opportunities for Omega Flex to expand its strategic businesses through the acquisition of one or more complimentary businesses. There can be no assurance that at the time of the prospective acquisition that Omega Flex would have the access to capital or resources to finance such an acquisition exclusively through its own reserves through the issuance of equity securities or through debt financing. With a publicly traded equity stock, Omega Flex would also have the flexibility of acquiring other businesses with its own capital stock, through debt financing, or through a combination of the two financing alternatives.

        However, as noted in “Anti-Takeover Measures”, Omega Flex may be prohibited from engaging in any such acquisition if the structure of such a transaction would cause a “change in control” of Omega Flex, and violate the strictures contained in the continuing agreements with Mestek regarding the acquisition or issuance of our common stock.

        Mestek’s board of directors considered a number of other factors in evaluating the distribution, including the possibility that we may experience disruptions to our business as a result of the distribution, the reaction of Mestek shareholders to the distribution and the one-time and on-going costs of the distribution. Mestek’s board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of the separation outweigh these factors, and that separating our business from Mestek’s other businesses in the form of a tax-free distribution to Mestek shareholders is appropriate and advisable for Mestek and its shareholders. Because Mestek believes a tax-free distribution to Mestek shareholders is the most economical means of separating our business for Mestek and its shareholders, other means of separating the business were not pursued.

Results of the Distribution

        After the distribution, we will be a separate public company operating our current businesses. Immediately after the distribution, we expect to have approximately 1,700 record and beneficial shareholders of our common stock, and approximately 10,152,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. This figure reflects all options exercised by Mestek officers prior to the record date of the distribution for the purchase of Mestek common stock. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined on the record date. The distribution will have no effect on the proposed “going private” transaction contemplated by Mestek.

Our Relationship with Mestek after the Distribution

        Following the distribution, we will be an independent public company, and Mestek will not have any stock ownership interest in Omega Flex. Prior to the distribution, we will enter into one or more agreements with Mestek for providing services by Mestek for our benefit, which may include legal, finance, human resources, insurance, purchasing, and similar corporate services, and allocating liabilities relating to our business, including employee benefits, tax and other liabilities and obligations attributable to periods prior to, and in some cases, after the distribution. The agreement or agreements also include an agreement that we generally will indemnify Mestek against liabilities arising out of our business, and that Mestek will generally indemnify us against liabilities arising out of Mestek’s retained HVAC and Metal Forming/Metal Processing businesses. The agreement or agreements are attached as exhibits to this information statement.

        Prior to or concurrently with the completion of the distribution, we intend to pay a cash dividend of approximately $_________ to our shareholders of record on _________, 2005 (prior to the date for the distribution). The effect of paying the above dividend will be to reduce the book value or shareholders’ equity component of our balance sheet. Prior to the payment of the dividend, Mestek intends to repay certain amounts it owes us, reflecting net cash management services, and financing activities as maintained and evidenced by our intercompany accounts, which will facilitate the payment of the dividend.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Distribution

        While this discussion summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution, it does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to Mestek shareholders to which special provisions of U.S. federal income tax law may apply based on their particular circumstances or status. For example, the discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to:

  o Mestek shareholders liable for alternative minimum tax;

  o Mestek shareholders whose "functional currency" is not the U.S. dollar;

  o financial institutions;

  o tax-exempt organizations;

  o traders who acquired their shares of stock by exercising employee stock options or as some other form of compensation;

  o qualified retirement plans;

  o regulated investment companies; or

  o real estate investment trusts.

        Mestek has received a legal opinion from Greenberg Traurig, LLP as to the federal income tax treatment of the distribution. In essence, the legal opinion letter states that the distribution should qualify as a transaction described in Section 355(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The discussions of the material federal income tax consequences of the distribution set forth below under “Tax Consequences to Mestek Shareholders” and under “Tax Consequences to Mestek and Omega Flex” are based on the U. S. Federal income tax law, as in effect on the date hereof, which law is subject to change potentially with retroactive effect.

        The legal opinion is subject to the accuracy of factual representations and assumptions described in the opinion. If the factual representations or assumptions are incorrect in any material respect, the holdings of the opinion would be jeopardized. We and Mestek are not aware of any facts or circumstances which would cause the representations and assumptions to be untrue. Additionally, events occurring after the distribution could potentially cause some of the representations and assumptions to be untrue and the distribution to be taxable. In this regard, we have agreed to refrain from taking future actions (as specified in a tax responsibility allocation agreement to be entered into by us and Mestek) and to provide further assurances that the distribution will qualify as tax-free. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Mestek for taxes incurred by Mestek from the distribution if the distribution becomes taxable to Mestek as a result of future events involving our stock or assets, as set forth in the tax responsibility allocation agreement. See “Relationships Between Our Company and Mestek, Inc.—Agreements Between Us and Mestek—Tax Responsibility Allocation Agreement.”

        If the distribution were not to qualify as tax-free to Mestek shareholders, each Mestek shareholder who receives our common stock in the distribution would be treated as if such shareholder received a taxable dividend equal to the value of our common stock received in the distribution. If the distribution were not to qualify as tax-free to Mestek, a corporate level capital gains tax would be payable by Mestek based upon the difference between the fair market value of the stock distributed and Mestek’s adjusted basis in the stock.

Tax Consequences to Mestek Shareholders. Assuming the distribution qualified as tax-free under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code:

  o No income gain or loss will be recognized by a Mestek shareholder as a result of the distribution, except with respect to any cash received in lieu of a fractional share of our stock.

  o The aggregate basis of a shareholder’s Mestek common stock and our common stock immediately after the distribution will be the same as the basis of the shareholder’s Mestek common stock immediately before the distribution, allocated between our common stock and the Mestek common stock in proportion to their relative fair market values.

  o The holding period of our common stock received by a Mestek shareholder, will include the holding period of the Mestek common stock with respect to which our common stock was distributed.

        U.S. Treasury regulations require each Mestek shareholder that receives our stock in the distribution to attach to the shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the year in which the distribution occurs a detailed statement setting forth information as may be appropriate to show the applicability of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code. Mestek will provide Mestek shareholders who receive our stock in the distribution with the information necessary to comply with this requirement.

Tax Consequences to Mestek and Omega Flex. Assuming the distribution qualified as tax-free under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code:

  o No material amount of gain or loss will be recognized by either Mestek or Omega Flex as a result of the distribution.

        THE SUMMARY OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION SET FORTH ABOVE DOES NOT ADDRESS THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY APPLY TO SHAREHOLDERS THAT ARE NOT U.S. HOLDERS AND DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF U.S. HOLDERS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. ALL MESTEK SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS TO DETERMINE THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION TO THEM, INCLUDING THE EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN INCOME AND OTHER TAX LAWS.

Listing and Trading of our Common Stock

        There is currently no public market for our common stock. We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX”. We anticipate that trading of our common stock will commence on a when-issued basis shortly before the record date. When-issued trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. On the first trading day following the distribution date, when-issued trading with respect to our common stock will end and regular way trading will begin. Regular way trading refers to trading after a security has been issued and typically involves a transaction that settles on the third full business day following the date of the transaction. We cannot predict what the trading prices for our common stock will be before or after the distribution date. In addition, we cannot predict any change that may occur in the trading price of Mestek’s common stock as a result of the distribution.

        The shares of our common stock distributed to Mestek’s shareholders will be freely transferable except for shares received by persons that may have a special relationship or affiliation with us. Persons that may be considered our affiliates after the distribution generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with us. This may include some or all of our officers and directors. Persons that are our affiliates will be permitted to sell their shares only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, such as the exemptions afforded by Section 4(1) of the Securities Act or Rule 144 there under.

Distribution Conditions and Terminations

        We expect that the distribution will be effective on the distribution date, [______] [__], 2005, provided that, among other things:

  o the SEC has declared effective our registration statement on Form 10, of which this information statement is a part, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and no stop order relating to the registration statement is in effect;

  o Mestek has received an opinion from Greenberg Traurig that based on certain facts represented to Greenberg Traurig, the distribution should qualify as a tax free transaction under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code;

  o we and Mestek have received all permits, registrations and consents required under the securities or blue sky laws of states or other political subdivisions of the United States or of foreign jurisdictions in connection with the distribution;

  o we have paid to Mestek and our other shareholders, prior to or concurrently with the distribution date, cash dividends aggregating approximately $_________;

  o no order, injunction or decree issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the distribution or any of the transactions related thereto, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the separation and distribution agreement, is in effect; and

  o our application for listing our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market or national stock exchange has been accepted by Nasdaq or such stock exchange.

        The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions will not create any obligation on Mestek’s part to effect the distribution, and Mestek’s board of directors has reserved the right to amend, modify or abandon the distribution and the related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date. Mestek’s board of directors may also waive any of these conditions.

Reason for Furnishing this Information Statement

        This information statement is being furnished solely to provide information to Mestek shareholders who will receive shares of Omega Flex common stock in the distribution. It is not and is not to be construed as an inducement or encouragement to buy or sell any of our securities. We believe that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes may occur after that date and neither Mestek nor we undertake any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of our respective public disclosure obligations.


DIVIDEND POLICY

        Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion and contractual restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends.


CAPITALIZATION

        The following table sets forth our capitalization on an actual basis as of March 31, 2005, and as adjusted to give effect to the following transactions as though they had been completed on March 31, 2005:

    (1)        The payment to Mestek and our other shareholders of a dividend, approximated here at $4,771,000, immediately prior to the distribution. The dividend will be funded by Mestek repaying $4,771,000 of the then outstanding intercompany payable to Omega with Omega, in turn, paying $4,771,000 in dividends, 86% to Mestek and 14% to two management shareholders, Kevin Hoben and Mark Albino. The final amount of this “pre-spin-off” dividend will differ from the estimate used here, principally as a result of the effect of net intercompany activity (cash advanced to Omega net of cash received from Omega and other routine charges and credits) between March 31, 2005 and the date of the “spin-off” or distribution,

    (2)        The termination of the “put” rights presently held by Kevin Hoben, President, and Mark Albino, Senior Vice President, of Omega Flex with respect to Omega common stock. In accordance with the authoritative accounting literature, this amount, approximated here at $1,716,000, will be reclassified from Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation to Paid in Capital at the date of the distribution, and

    (3)        The 10,151,794 shares of common stock shall be at a par value of $.01 per share, bringing the capital stock to $101,518. This will result in a $49,500 increase adjustment to Common Stock and a corresponding $49,500 decrease to Paid In Capital.

    (4)        Transaction costs expected to be incurred by Omega subsequent to March 31, 2005 are approximately here at $99,000, net of income taxes. . Costs to be incurred are in the form of legal advice, audit fees, NASDAQ registration fees, and other minor costs.


        This table should be read in conjunction with “Selected Historical Financial and Operating Data,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.

As of March 31, 2005

Pro Forma
Actual Adjustments Adjusted
(in thousands)

Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation
$2,384  ($668) --- 
    ($1,716)  

Current portion of long-term debt
$186  ---  $186 

Long-term debt:
     
Mortgage Note $3,364  ---  $3,364 

Common Stock
$52  $49  $101 

Paid in Capital
$9,046  $1,716  $10,713 
  ($49)  

Retained Earnings
$7,784  ($4,103) $3,582 
  ($99)(4)  
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income $604   ---   $604  

Total stockholder's equity
$17,486   ($2,486) $15,000  

Total capitalization
$23,420  ($4,870) $18,550 

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA

        The following table presents a summary of selected financial information derived from our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and the unaudited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the unaudited financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, and the unaudited financial statements for the three months ending March 31, 2005 and 2004 are included elsewhere in this information statement. The historical information presented in the following table may not be indicative of the results of operations or financial position that would have been obtained if we had been an independent company during the periods shown, or of our future performance as an independent company.

        The selected financial information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion & Analysis and the audited financial statements and the corresponding notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

For the Year Ended
December 31
For the Three Months Ended
March 31
2000
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)
2002
(audited)
2003
(audited)
2004
(audited)
2004
(unaudited)
2005
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Statement of Operations              
Net Sales $31,031  $30,635  $34,963  $36,996  $48,165  $11,087  $13,251 
Cost of Sales 17,609   17,581   18,366   18,893   23,397   5,618   6,478  

Gross Profit
13,422  13,054  16,597  18,103  24,768  5,469  6,773 
Operating Expenses 9,168   9,143   10,805   11,556   15,562   3,462   4,421  

Operating Income before Interest and Taxes
4,254  3,911  5,792  6,547  9,206  2,007  2,352 
Interest Income (Expense) 301  303  300  335  371  80  64 
Other Income net ---  ---  ---  10  134 
Provision for Income Taxes 1,866   1,746   2,529   2,855   3,710   868   1,035  

Net Income
$2,689   $2,468   $3,563   $4,037   $6,001   $1,220   $1,388  

Balance Sheet Data

Current Assets
$13,607  $17,177  $23,356  $24,811  $31,299  $25,435  $20,724 

Total Assets
$19,833  $22,877  $28,664  $34,432  $40,522  $34,902  $30,166 

Current Liabilities
$4,141  $4,688  $6,837  $8,497  $12,840  $7,607  $8,734 

Total Liabilities
$4,664  $5,211  $7,425  $8,800  $16,522  $7,910  $12,666 
Minority Interest ---  ---  $12  $13  $4  $15  $14 

Total Shareholders' Equity
$15,169  $17,666  $21,227  $25,619  $23,996* $26,977  $17,486**
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' equity $19,833  $22,877  $28,664  $34,432  $40,522  $34,902  $30,166 

*Reflects payment of intercompany dividend to Mestek of $7,740,000 (86% of $9,000,000) in October 2004.

**Reflects payment of intercompany dividend to Mestek of $8,041,000 (86% of $9,350,000) in January 2005.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

          The unaudited pro forma financial statements presented below consist of the unaudited pro forma income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and the unaudited pro forma balance sheet, as of March 31, 2005. The unaudited pro forma financial statements have been prepared to reflect certain adjustments to our historical financial information, which are described in the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements, to give effect to the spin-off, as if it had been completed on March 31, 2005 for balance sheet purposes and January 1, 2004 for the statements of operations. The unaudited pro forma financial statements are derived from our unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, which are included elsewhere in the information statement but do not purport to represent our financial position and results of operation had the distribution occurred on January 1, 2004 or March 31, 2005 or to project our financial performance for any future period. The unaudited pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis,” our historical audited financial statements, and the related notes included elsewhere in this Information Statement.

OMEGA FLEX, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INCOME STATEMENT
(in thousands)

Historical Adjustments Pro Forma

Net Sales
$13,251  ---  $13,251 
Cost Of Sales 6,478   ---   6,478  

Gross Profit
6,773  ---  6,773 
Operating Expenses 4,193  ---  4,193 
Stock Based Compensation 228   (228)  (2) ---  

Operating Profit
2,352  228  2,580 

Interest Income (Expense)
64  10 (3) 74 
Other Income (Expense) 7   ---   7  

Income Before Taxes
2,423  238  2,661 
Provision For Income Taxes 1,035   4   (5  1,039  

Net Income
$1,388   $234   $1,622  

Basic Earnings Per Share
$0.14  $0.02  $0.16 
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 10,152  ---  10,152 

Diluted Earnings Per Share
$0.14  $0.02  $0.16 
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 10,152  ---  10,152 

OMEGA FLEX, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INCOME STATEMENTYEAR
ENDED 12/31/04
(in thousands)

Historical Adjustments Pro Forma

Net Sales
$48,165  ---  $48,165 
Cost Of Sales 23,397   ---   23,397  

Gross Profit
24,768  ---  24,768 
Operating Expenses 14,718  ---  14,718 (1)
Stock Based Compensation 844   (844) (2) ---  

Operating Profit
9,206  844  10,050 
Interest Income (Expense) 371  (346) (3) 25 
Other Income (Expense) 134   ---   134  

Income Before Taxes
9,711  498  10,209 
Provision For Income Taxes 3,710   (132) (5) 3,578  

Net Income
$6,001   $630   $6,631  

Basic Earnings Per Share
$0.66  ($0.01) $0.65 
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 9,042 (4) 1,110  10,152 (4)

Diluted Earnings Per Share
$0.59  $0.06  $0.65 
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 10,152 (4) ---  10,152 (4)

See Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements following.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
as of March 31, 2005

Historical Adjustments Pro forma

Current Assets:
     
  Cash and Cash Equivalents 362  ---  362 
  Accounts Receivable-net 7,322  ---  7,322 

  Inventories
6,323  ---  6,323 
  Intercompany Receivable from Parent 6,503  ($4,771) (1) --- 
  (1,732) (2)  
 Other Current Assets 214 ---   214  
Total Current Assets 20,724  (6,503) 14,221 

Fixed Assets
5,916  ---  5,916 
Goodwill 3,526  ---  3,526 
Other Assets ---   1,732 (2)   1,732 
Total Assets 30,166  (4,771) 25,395 

Current Liabilities:
  Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 186  ---  186 
  Accounts Payable 1,676  160 (5) 1,836 
  Accrued Compensation 648  ---  648 
  Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation 2,384  (668) (1) --- 
  (1,716) (3)  
  Accrued Commissions 672  ---  672 
  Other Accrued Liabilities 3,168   (61) (5) 3,107  
Total 8,734  (2,285) 6,449 
Long Term Debt net of current portion 3,364  ---  3,364 
Deferred Taxes 568   ---   568  

Total Liabilities
12,666  (2,285) 10,381 

Minority Interest
14  ---  14 
Shareholders' Equity:      

  Common Stock
52  49 (4) 101 
  Paid In Capital 9,046  1,716 (1) 10,713 
  (49) (4)  

  Retained Earnings
7,784  (4,103) (2) 3,582 
  (99) (5)  

  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
604   ---   604  

Total Shareholders' Equity
17,486   (2,486) 15,000  

     Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity
$30,166   ($4,771) $25,395  

See Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements following.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.

NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements have been prepared to reflect the following adjustments to the Company’s historical financial statements to give effect to the spin-off as if it had occurred on December 31, 2004 for balance sheet purposes and January 1, 2004 for income statement purposes. These Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the pro forma results of operations and financial position of the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and related notes which are included elsewhere in this information statement.

Income Statement Adjustments:

(1)         Mestek charged management and other fees of $563,000 to the Company in 2004 and $120,000 for the quarter ending March 31, 2005. A review of the specific services Mestek is expected to continue providing subsequent to the planned spin-off described in Note 14 to the accompanying financial statements indicates that the fees will be approximately $70,000 per year, resulting in an annual reduction of $ $492,000. The Company expects that incremental costs related to operating as a public company will approximate $ 492,000 per annum and , accordingly no net adjustment has been made to the 2004 or three month 2005 Pro Forma Income Statements.

(2)         Stock based compensation expense relates to the Company’s potential obligation to its management shareholders in connection with certain “put” rights held by those shareholders. It is expected that these rights will be cancelled by agreement coincident with the spin-off. Accordingly, for purposes of the Pro Forma Income Statement this expense is eliminated.

(3)         The Company’s Interest Income (Expense) for 2004 includes interest income accrued on the intercompany receivable from Mestek of $457,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $64,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. For purposes of the above 2004 and three month 2005 pro forma Income Statements it is assumed that if the spin-off were to occur on January 1, 2004 the incentive stock options held by the Company’s management would have been exercised prior to December 31, 2003. It is further assumed that the Company would have issued a $ 9million dollar dividend subsequent to the exercise of the options but prior to the spin-off (as happened in fact in 2004) and it is further assumed that the management shareholders and the Company would have agreed to waive the put and call rights discussed in greater detail in Note 12 to the accompanying financial statements (as is expected to happen in connection with the actual spin-off) resulting in an addition to paid in capital at January 1, 2004 of approximately $ 2,621,000. It is further assumed that immediately prior to the spin-off the Company would have declared and paid a dividend analogous to the “pre-spin-off dividend” described in the Balance Sheet Adjustments below of approximately $ 5.5million. The cumulative effect of these assumptions would be to reduce the Intercompany Receivable from Mestek as of January 1, 2004 to approximately $ 819,000 which amount would then have been converted to a Note Receivable from Mestek accruing interest at the three year Treasury Note rate plus 100 basis points. After accounting for additional interest income which would be earned in 2004 on funds otherwise transferred in the ordinary course to Mestek, the Company has determined that its interest income would have been reduced by $ 346,000 in 2004 but increased by $ 10,000 in the first quarter of 2005.

(4)         For purposes of comparability the weighted average shares outstanding for the historical 2004 figures are adjusted to give retroactive affect to the stock split authorized on March 14, 2005 and completed on June 23, 2005 as if it had occurred on January 1, 2004. The stock split ratio is assumed to be 10,151.794 to 1 for the historical basic and diluted weighted average shares and also for the pro forma basic and diluted weighted average shares reflecting the assumption that 151,794 shares of Mestek common stock will be issued prior to June 23, 2005, the record date for the “spin off” of Omega shares to Mestek stockholders, out of the 185,000 Mestek shares associated with the presently unexercised Mestek incentive stock options. The pro forma diluted weighted average shares are based, however, on a stock split ratio of 10,215.236 to 1 reflecting the assumption that all 185,000 Mestek shares associated with Mestek incentive stock options.

(5)         Represents the estimated tax effect of the other pro forma adjustments at our effective rate for the periods presented adjusted for restrictions on the deductibility of stock based compensation expense.

Balance Sheet Adjustments:

(1)         The payment to Mestek and our other shareholders of a dividend, approximated here at $4,771,000, immediately prior to the distribution. The dividend will be funded by Mestek repaying $4,771,000 of the then outstanding intercompany payable to the Company with the Company, in turn, paying $4,771,000 in dividends, 86% to Mestek and 14% to two management shareholders, Kevin Hoben and Mark Albino. The final amount of this “pre-spin-off’ dividend will differ from the estimate used here, principally as a result of the effect of net intercompany activity (cash received from Omega net of cash advanced to Omega and other routine charges and credits) between March 31, 2005 and the date of the “spin-off” or distribution.

(2)         The conversion of the remaining intercompany receivable from Mestek, approximated here at $1,732,000 at the date of the distribution to a formal promissory note bearing interest at the then prevailing 3 year Treasury Note yield plus 100 basis points and maturing in 36 months.

(3)         The termination of the “put” rights presently held by Kevin Hoben, President, and Mark Albino, Senior Vice President, of Omega Flex with respect to Omega Flex common stock. In accordance with the authoritative accounting literature, this amount, approximated here at $1,716,000 , will be reclassified from Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation to Paid in Capital at the date of the distribution.

(4)         The 10,151,794 shares of common stock shall be at a par value of $.01 per share, bringing the capital stock to $101,518. This will result in a $49,500 increase adjustment to Common Stock and a corresponding $49,500 decrease to Paid In Capital.

(5)         The Company expects to incur additional transaction costs beyond March 31, 2005 until the date “of spin-off” in the amount of $160,000 less applicable income taxes of $61,000 for a net cost of $99,000. Costs to be incurred are in the form of attorneys’ fees, audit fees, NASDAQ registration fees, and other minor costs.


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the audited financial statements and corresponding notes, and the unaudited pro forma financial statements and corresponding notes, found elsewhere in this information statement. This section of the information statement contains forward-looking statements. Please see the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.

Overview

        We are one of the world’s leading manufacturers of flexible metal hose. Our focus is to utilize our core strengths of manufacturing technology and product innovation to develop and grow a suite of products built around the unique capabilities and benefits of flexible metal hose. We are currently engaged in a number of different markets in which our products are utilized, including construction, manufacturing, transportation, petrochemical, pharmaceutical and other industries.

        We operate our business as a single operating segment that consists of the manufacture and sale of flexible metal hose and accessories. All of our annular flexible metal hose is manufactured at our Exton, Pennsylvania facility using rotary process fabricating lines to manufacture all products having an inner diameter of two inches or less. Larger diameter hoses are a small fraction of our business and are made using different manufacturing methods. A majority of our sales across all industries are generated through independent outside sales organizations such as sales representatives, wholesalers and distributors, or a combination of both.

Effect of Spin-off from Mestek

        As discussed elsewhere in this information statement, we have historically utilized the corporate services of our 86% shareholder, Mestek, Inc. to handle a variety of functions for us, including strategic business planning, legal, financial, insurance, human resources and employee benefits, and environmental health and safety functions. After the distribution, we will be a stand-alone company and although we have entered into one or more agreements with Mestek for a continuation of some or all of these services, the terms and the prices on which such services are rendered may be different than the terms and prices in effect prior to the distribution. We will also undertake additional costs associated with being a public company, including fees for national stock exchange and transfer agents, independent auditors, board of directors and committee fees, outside consultants to assist with review and testing of accounting systems, and general legal and other expenses associated with the distribution. These anticipated costs are not reflected in our historical financial statements or results of operations.


NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

RETURN ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS EMPLOYED

2004, 2003, 2002, and 1st Quarter 2005

        The following analysis of the Company’s Results of Operations focuses on the relationship of “Core Operating Profits”, a “non-GAAP financial measure”, as defined below, to Average Net Assets Employed, as defined below. Management believes this focus, which is essentially an “enterprise value” point of view, is more useful to investors as it isolates and relates the Company’s ongoing pre-tax, pre-interest, operating earnings to the total capital invested, whether debt or equity capital.

        The Company’s Operating Profits in 2004, 2003 2002 and the first quarter 2005, as reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, included Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Charges of $844,000, $668,000. $635,000 and $228,000, respectively, that relate to the “put” rights of two of the Company’s principal executive officers (who are also shareholders of Omega Flex prior to the distribution) which potentially obligate the Company to repurchase the officer’s option shares at book value, as more fully explained in Notes 12 and 14 to the accompanying financial statements. The accrual of these charges reflects the conservative assumption that the “put” rights will be exercised and are therefore properly reflected in Operating Profits in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These charges are added back in arriving at “Core Operating Profits”. However, in light of the Company’s present plans to become a publicly traded company, as more fully described herein, it is increasingly unlikely that the put rights will be exercised. Accordingly, management believes that the true economic earning power of the Company in the first quarter 2005 and for the years 2004, 2003, and 2002 is more clearly identified by disregarding these charges. It is expected that the aforementioned “put” rights will be extinguished by agreement coincident with the planned “spin-off” of Omega, as more fully described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Core Operating Profits, as the term is used herein, is defined as Operating Profits determined in accordance with GAAP, as reflected in the accompanying financial statements, plus the aforementioned Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Charges.

        “Core Operating Profits” as defined above represents a “non-GAAP financial measure” which is reconcilable with the “comparable GAAP financial measure”, Operating Profits, as follows:

Years 1st Qtr
2004 2003 2002 2005
(in thousands)
Operating Profits (comparable GAAP financial measure) $9,206  $6,547  $5,792  $2,352 
Plus: Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Charges 844   668   635   228  
Core Operating Profits (non-GAAP financial measure) $10,050   $7,215   $6,427   $2,580  

        The Company’s Return on Average Net Assets Employed, defined as Core Operating Profits, over Average Net Assets Employed From Continuing Operations (Total Assets less Current and Non Current Liabilities-other than Current and Non Current Portions of Long-Term Debt-averaged over 12 months) for the years 2004, 2003, and 2002, and 3 months ended March 31, 2005 was as follows:

Years 1st Qtr
2004 2003 2002 2005
(in thousands)
Core Operating Profits (non-GAAP financial measure) $10,050  $7,215  $6,427  $2,580 
Average Net Assets Employed from Continuing Operations $15,873  $11,873  $10,880  $13,313 
Return on Average Net Assets Employed-Annualized 63.31% 60.77% 59.07% 77.52%

        The increase in overall Return on Average Net Assets Employed from 59.07% in 2002 to 63.31% in 2004 reflected several themes:

  1. The Company’s sales increased 37.8%, principally in the TracPipe® flexible gas piping product, as more fully described under “Results of Operations.”

  2. Core operating profits increased 56.4% principally from our ability to sustain higher levels of growth without adding commensurate continuing resource costs, increased levels of sales, enhanced purchasing efficiencies, and our ability to effectively gain productivity increases at the higher volumes.

  3. Our abilities to effectively manage existing costs by gaining higher levels of manufacturing efficiencies, coupled with enhanced purchasing practices, also as more fully described under “Results of Operations”.

  4. Purchase of Omega Flex’s main production facility by its subsidiary, Exton Ranch.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ANALYSIS: March 2005 Vs. March 2004

        The Company reported comparative results from continuing operations for 1 Qtr 2005 and 1 Qtr 2004 as follows:

1st Quarter 1st Quarter
2005

($000)
2005

%
2004

($000)
2004

%
Net Sales $13,251  100.00% $11,087 100.00% 
Gross Profit $6,773  51.11% $5,469  49.33%
Core Operating Profits (a non-GAAP financial measure) $2,580  19.47%$ 2,190  19.75%
Average Net Assets Employed (ANAE) $13,313    $14,550   
Return on ANAE - Annualized 77.52%   60.21%  

        The Company’s sales increased $2,164,000 (19.5%) from $11,087,000 in the first quarter 2004 versus $13,251,000 in the first quarter 2005 due to continued strong sales of the Company’s flagship TracPipe® flexible gas piping product and its patented connection system. TracPipe® is a corrugated stainless steel tubing product developed especially for use in the piping and installation of gas appliances. Sales of TracPipe® were sustained by relatively strong single family and multi-family residential construction activity driven by historically low interest rates. The $2,164,000 increase in sales from first quarter 2004 to first quarter 2005 reflects volume increases of $692,000 and net price increases of $1,472,000.

        The Company’s gross profit margins were up slightly from 49.33% in the first quarter 2004 to 51.11% in the first quarter 2005 indicative of our abilities to effectively price our products, despite inflationary pressures affecting stainless steel and other commodities

        Reflecting the factors mentioned above, Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, increased by 17.8% from $2,190,000 in the first quarter 2004 to $2,580,000 in the first quarter 2005. Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconcilable with Operating Profit, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as follows:

1st Quarter
2005 2004
(in thousands)
Core Operating Profits (a non-GAAP financial measure) $2,580  $2,190 
Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Expense (228) (183)
Operating Profits (comparable GAAP financial measure) $2,352  $2,007 

        Selling, General and Administrative, and Engineering expenses for the first quarter 2005 of $4,421,000 exceeded the first quarter 2004 by $959,000, or 27.7%. As a percentage of net revenues, these expenses increased from 31.2% of net revenues in the first quarter 2004 to 33.4% in the first quarter 2005 due to increased costs associated with higher net sales, legal costs, and management incentive compensation, offset by reduced expenditures for new product development.

        Interest Income on intercompany notes receivable was $101,000 in the first quarter 2005 and $80,000 for the first quarter 2004. Interest Expense was $37,000 for the first quarter 2005 and $0 for the first quarter 2004, reflecting commercial bank borrowings in April 2004 related to the Company’s purchase of its manufacturing premises, as more fully explained in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements and as discussed in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Structure section herein.

        Income Tax Expense for first quarter 2005, as a percentage of pretax income, differed slightly from the “expected” income tax expense due to federal and state income tax limitations on deductions related to Incentive Stock Options, as more fully described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements.

ANALYSIS: 2004 VS. 2003

        The Company reported comparative results from continuing operations for 2004 and 2003 as follows:

2004
($000)
2004
%
2003
($000)
2003
%
Net Sales $48,165  100.00% $36,996 100.00% 
Gross Profit $24,768  51.42% $18,103 48.93%
Core Operating Profits (a non-GAAP financial measure) $10,050  20.87% $7,215  19.50%
Average Net Assets Employed (ANAE) $15,873    $11,873   
Return on ANAE 63.31%   60.77%  

        The Company’s net sales for 2004 of $48,165,000 exceeded 2003 by $11,169,000, or 30.2% due to strong sales of the Company’s flagship TracPipe® flexible gas piping product and its patented connection system, which were sustained by continued relatively strong single family and multi-family residential construction activity driven by historically low interest rates. The $11,169,000 increase from 2003 to 2004 reflects volume increases of $7,809,000 and net price increases of $3,360,000.

        The Company’s gross profit margins for 2004 of 51.42% were up 2.49 percentage points from 48.93% in 2003, despite heavy inflationary pressures affecting stainless steel and other commodities, due to our abilities to stabilize costs for our raw materials in exchange for committed volume purchases, continued manufacturing efficiencies, improved inventory control procedures and our ability to recoup our costs in the market place. Our commitments were not expected to, nor did they, exceed our requirements for the year. Reflecting the factors mentioned above, Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, increased by 39.3% from $7,215,000 in 2003 to $10,050,000 in 2004. Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconcilable with Operating Profit, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as follows:

2004 2003
(in thousands)
Core Operating Profits (a non-GAAP financial measure) $10,050  $7,215 
Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Expense (844) (668)
Operating Profits (comparable GAAP financial measure) $9,206  $6,547 

        Sales expense increased $2,140,000 from $6,569,000 in 2003 to $8,709,000 in 2004. As a percentage of revenues, these costs increased from 17.8% in 2003 to 18.1% in 2004, reflecting the effect of increased costs due to volume, principally commissions and freight costs, additional sales personnel including employee-related expenses and advertising. Promotional incentives and year end rebates, which have been deducted in arriving at net sales, increased in 2004 versus 2003 thereby decreasing net sales, serving to further increase the sales expense as a percentage of net sales.

        General and Administrative expenses increased $1,936,000 from $3,554,000 in 2003 to $5,490,000 in 2004. As a percentage of revenues, these costs increased from 9.6% in 2003 to 11.4% in 2004, reflecting the effect of the expenses associated with legal issues detailed in the section entitled “Business” under “Legal Proceedings”, increased product liability insurance costs, management compensation, and computer expenses

        Engineering expense decreased $70,000 from $1,433,000 in 2003 to $1,363,000 in 2004. As a percentage of continuing revenues, these costs decreased from 3.9% in 2003 to 2.8% in 2004, reflecting the effect of improved revenues and reduced spending for new product qualification expenses

        Interest Expense was incurred for the first time in 2004, reflecting commercial bank borrowings in 2004 related to the Company’s purchase of its manufacturing premises, as more fully explained in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements and as discussed in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Structure section herein.

        Income Tax Expense for 2004, as a percentage of pretax income, was consistent with the “expected” income tax expense, as more fully described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements.

ANALYSIS: 2003 VS. 2002

        The Company reported comparative results from continuing operations for 2003 and 2002 as follows:

2003
($000)
2003
%
2002
($000)
2002
%
Net Sales $36,996  100.00% $34,963 100.00%
Gross Profit $18,103  48.93% $16,597 47.47%
Core Operating Profits (a non-GAAP financial measure) $7,215  19.50%$ 6,427  18.38%
Average Net Assets Employed (ANAE) $11,873    $10,880   
Return on ANAE 60.77%   59.07%  

        The Company’s net sales for 2003 of $34,963,000 exceeded 2002 by $2,033,000, or 4.8% due to incremental growth in the Company’s flagship TracPipe® flexible gas piping product and patented connection system. Sales of TracPipe® were supported by continued improvement in single family and multi-family residential housing starts buoyed by relatively low interest rates.

        The Company’s gross profit margins for 2003 of 48.93% were up 1.46 percentage points from 47.47% in 2003 due to enhanced procurement practices and manufacturing efficiencies.

        Reflecting the factors mentioned above, Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure increased by 12.3% from $6,427,000 in 2002 to $7,215,000 in 2003. Core Operating Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconcilable with Operating Profit, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as follows:

2003 2002
(in thousands)
Core Operating Profits (a non GAAP financial measure) $7,215  $6,427 
Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Expense (668) (635)
Operating Profits (comparable GAAP financial measure) $6,547  $5,792 

        Sales expense increased $202,000 from $6,367,000 in 2002 to $6,569,000 in 2003, reflective of the costs associated with additional sales personnel. As a percentage of revenues, these costs decreased slightly from 18.2% in 2002 to 17.8% in 2003.

        General and Administrative expenses increased $351,000 from $3,203,000 in 2002 to $3,554,000 in 2003. As a percentage of revenues, these costs increased slightly from 9.2% in 2002 to 9.6% in 2003,

        Engineering expense increased $198,000 from $1,235,000 in 2002 to $1,433,000 in 2003. As a percentage of revenues, these costs increased from 3.5% in 2002 to 3.9% in 2003, reflecting the costs for new products development.

        Interest income increased slightly from $300,000 in 2002 to $335,000 in 2003, reflecting the interest on the intercompany receivable from Mestek, as more fully explained in Note 4 to the accompanying financial statements and as discussed in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Structure section herein.

        Income Tax Expense for 2003, as a percentage of pretax income, differed slightly from the “expected” income tax expense due to federal and state income tax limitations on deductions related to Incentive Stock Options, as more fully described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements.


COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

        The Company is obligated under Indemnity Agreements executed on behalf of 11 of the Company’s officers and directors. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company is contingently liable for costs which may be incurred by the officers and directors in connection with claims arising by reason of these individuals’ roles as officers and directors.

        The Company retains significant obligations under its commercial insurance policies. For losses occurring in the policy years ending October 1, 2004 and October 1, 2005, the Company retained liability for the first $2,000,000 per occurrence of commercial general liability claims (including products liability claims), subject to an agreed aggregate. For losses occurring in the policy year ended October 31, 2003, the Company retained liability for the first $500,000 per occurrence of commercial general liability claims (including product liability), subject to an agreed aggregate. In addition, for all the three years, the Company retained liability for the first $250,000 per occurrence of workers compensation coverage, subject to an agreed aggregate. The Company maintains reserves for its obligations under these various policies based on claim experience and the reserves established by the insurers in relation to these claims. The reserve balances at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were not material in amount.

        The Company is obligated as a guarantor with respect to the debt of Mestek, Inc. under its primary commercial bank line of credit. In accordance with FIN 45, the Company has evaluated the fair value of the guarantee obligation as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and concluded that the fair value at these dates was not material and accordingly no liability has been recorded on the books of the Company in respect of the guarantee. As and when the “Omega Flex Spin-off” described in more detail in Note 15 is completed, the Company expects that Mestek and its primary commercial banks will agree to terminate the Company’s obligation as guarantor.

        The Company is subject to several legal actions and proceedings in which various monetary claims are asserted. Management, after consultation with its corporate legal department and outside counsel, does not anticipate that any ultimate liability arising out of all such litigation and proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. However, the Company is engaged in a litigation matter that was filed in the Clark County Circuit Court, in Arkansas, alleging that the Company’s corrugated stainless steel tubing product, TracPipe®, and similar products manufactured by several other manufacturers, also named as defendants in the case, is defective, or that instructions, warnings and training in the installation of corrugated stainless steel tubing are defective, against potential damage to the corrugated stainless steel tubing systems, and the structures served by these systems, caused by the nearby lightning strikes. The plaintiffs in this case have named three other corrugated stainless steel tubing manufacturers, and one plumber residing in Arkansas, as defendants in this matter, and are seeking class action certification as representatives of all similarly situated persons in the United States, or in the alternative, in Arkansas and Texas, pursuant to the Arkansas rules of civil procedure. The case has only recently been filed, and no determinations have been made as of the date of this information statement whether to certify the class either within the United States, or within the states of Texas and Arkansas. We believe that the plaintiffs’ claims are entirely without merit and are defending the matter vigorously. At this time, there is no ability to estimate the cost of defense or potential damages related to this matter.

Warranty Commitments

        Gas transmission products, such as those made by the Company, carry potentially serious personal injury risks in the event of failures in the field. As a result, the Company has extensive internal testing and other quality control procedures and historically the Company has not had a meaningful failure rate in the field due to the extensive nature of these internal controls. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain a warranty reserve beyond a nominal amount as of December 31, 2004 or December 31, 2003.


FUTURE IMPACT OF KNOWN TRENDS OR UNCERTAINTIES

        The Company’s operations are sensitive to a number of market factors, any one of which could materially adversely affect its results of operations in any given year:

         Construction Activity —The Company is directly impacted by the level of single family and multi-family residential housing starts and, to a lesser extent, commercial construction starts. Historically low interest rates in 2004 contributed to continued strong residential construction activity in that year. Significant increases in interest rates or reductions in residential construction activity for other reasons in future periods, however, could be expected to adversely affect the Company’s revenues, possibly materially.

         Technological Changes —Although the HVAC industry has historically been impacted by technology changes in a relatively incremental manner, it cannot be discounted that radical changes—such as might be suggested by fuel cell technology, burner technology and/or other developing technologies which might impact the use of natural gas—could materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and/or financial position in the future.

         Environmental Laws Affecting Operations and Product Design — The Company is subject to numerous laws and regulations that govern the discharge and disposal of materials into the environment. The Company’s operations, and its products to the extent that they are related to combustion in HVAC applications as currently designed and applied, entail the risk of future noncompliance with the evolving landscape of environmental laws regulations and industry standards. The cost of complying with the various environmental laws regulations and industry standards is likely to increase over time, and there can be no assurance that the cost of compliance, including changes to manufacturing processes and design changes to current HVAC product offerings that involve the creation of carbon dioxide or other currently unregulated compounds emitted in atmospheric combustion, or efficiency standards, will not over the long-term and in the future have a material adverse affect on the Company’s results of operations.

         Weather Conditions —The Company’s flagship TracPipe® product is used in residential and commercial heating applications. As such, the demand for its products depends upon colder weather and benefits from extreme cold. Severe climatic changes, such as those suggested by the “global warming” phenomenon, could over time adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

         Purchasing Practices —It has been the Company’s policy in recent years to aggregate purchase volumes for high value commodities with fewer vendors to achieve maximum cost reductions while maintaining quality and service. This policy has been effective in reducing costs but has introduced additional risk which could potentially result in short-term supply disruptions or cost increases from time to time in the future.

         Supply Disruptions and Commodity Risks —The Company uses a variety of materials in the manufacture of its products, including stainless steel, polyethylene and brass for its AutoFlare® connectors. In connection with the purchase of commodities, principally stainless steel for manufacturing requirements, the Company enters into some commodity forward agreements to effectively hedge a portion of the cost of the commodity. This forward approach is done for a portion of the Company’s requirements, while the balance of the transactions required for these commodities are conducted in the cash or “spot” market. The forward agreements require the Company to accept delivery of the commodity in the quantities committed, at the agreed upon forward price, and within the timeframe specified. The cash or “spot” market transactions are executed at the Company’s discretion and at the current market prices. In addition to the raw material cost strategy described above, the Company enters into fixed pricing agreements for the fabrication charges necessary to convert these commodities into useable product. Management believes at present that it has adequate sources of supply for its raw materials and components (subject to the risks described above under Purchasing Practices) and has historically not had significant difficulty in obtaining the raw materials, component parts or finished goods from its suppliers. The Company is not dependent for any commodity on a single supplier, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on its business.

         Interest Rate Sensitivity —The Company’s borrowings are relatively small compared to its cash flow and are largely LIBOR rate based. The Company believes that a 100 basis-point increase in its cost of funds would not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements taken as a whole. Interest rates are nonetheless significant to the Company as a participant in the residential construction industry. (See Construction Activity, above.)

         Retention of Qualified Personnel – The Company does not operate with multiple levels of management. It is relatively “flat” organizationally, which does subject the Company to the risks associated with the loss of critical managers for whatever reason. From time to time, there may be a shortage of skilled labor, which may make it more difficult and expensive for the Company to attract and retain qualified employees. The Company is dependent upon the relatively unique talents and managerial skills of a small number of key executives.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES

        Financial Reporting Release No. 60, released by the Securities and Exchange Commission, requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The following is a brief discussion of the Company’s more significant accounting policies.

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to revenue recognition, accounts receivable valuations, inventory valuations, goodwill valuation, intangible asset valuations, product liability costs, workers compensation claims reserves, health care claims reserves, and accounting for income taxes. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates.

        Our critical accounting policies and significant estimates and assumptions are described in more detail as follows:

        Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The estimated allowance for uncollectible amounts is based primarily on specific analysis of accounts in the receivable portfolio and historical write-off experience. While management believes the allowance to be adequate, if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

        Product Liability Reserves

        As explained in more detail in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has absorbed significantly higher levels of insurance risk subsequent to September 11, 2001 due to the effects of September 11, 2001 on pricing in the commercial insurance marketplace. As a result, the Company must establish estimates relative to the outcome of various product liability and general liability matters which are inherently judgmental and subject to ongoing change.

        Inventory

        The Company values its inventory at the lower of cost to purchase and/or manufacture the inventory, principally determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, or the current estimated market value of the inventory. The Company periodically reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess and/or obsolete inventory based primarily on its estimated forecast of product demand, as well as based on historical usage. A significant decrease in demand for the Company’s products or technological changes in the industries in which the Company operates could result in an increase of excess or obsolete inventory quantities on hand, requiring adjustments to the value of the Company’s inventories.


        Revenue Recognition

        The Company’s revenue recognition activities relate almost entirely to the manufacture and sale of its flexible metal hose and related products. Under generally accepted accounting principles, revenues are considered to have been earned when the Company has substantially accomplished what it must do to be entitled to the benefits represented by the revenues. With respect to sales of the Company’s products, the following criteria represent preconditions to the recognition of revenue:

          * persuasive evidence of an arrangement must exist;

          * delivery has occurred or services rendered;

          * the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and

          * collection is reasonably assured.

        Warranty

        Gas transmission products, such as those made by the Company, carry potentially serious personal injury risks in the event of failures in the field. As a result, the Company has extensive internal testing and other quality control procedures and historically the Company has not had a meaningful failure rate in the field due to the extensive nature of these internal controls. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain a warranty reserve beyond a nominal amount as of December 31, 2004 or December 31, 2003.

        Health Care Claim Reserves

        The Company self-insures a substantial portion of the health benefits provided for its employees and maintains reserves in this regard. The Company relies upon a recognized actuarial consulting firm to help it set and maintain these reserves.

        Workers Compensation Claims Reserves

        The Company provides workers compensation coverage principally through commercial insurance carriers using “high deductible” programs, which require the Company to reserve for and pay a high proportion of its workers compensation claims payable. The Company relies upon the expertise of its insurance carriers and its own historical experience in setting the reserves related to these claims.

        Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This statement affected the Company’s treatment of goodwill and other intangible assets. The statement required that goodwill existing at the date of adoption be reviewed for possible impairment and that impairment tests be periodically repeated, with impaired assets written down to fair value. Additionally, existing goodwill and intangible assets were required to be assessed and classified within the statement’s criteria. Intangible assets with finite useful lives continued to be amortized over those periods. Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indeterminable lives ceased.

        The Company completed the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test during the six months ended June 30, 2002 based on the amount of goodwill as of the beginning of fiscal year 2002, as required by FAS No. 142. The Company performed a valuation to determine the fair value of the Company. Based on the results of the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test, the Company determined that no goodwill impairment existed as of January 1, 2002. The Company performed an annual impairment test in accordance with FAS 142 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The analysis under step one of FAS 142 indicated no impairment of goodwill existed as of December 31, 2003 or 2004.

        Accounting for Income Taxes

        The Company has elected in 2004 and prior years to file its federal income tax return as part of the Mestek, Inc. parent company, consolidated return. Mestek and Omega account for Omega’s federal tax liabilities on the “separate company basis” method in accordance with FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under this method Omega records tax expense and related deferred taxes and tax benefits in a manner comparable to that which it would record if it were not affiliated with Mestek.

        The preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements requires it to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates, including those outside the United States which may be subject to certain risks that ordinarily would not be expected in the United States. The income tax accounting process involves estimating its actual current exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation and stock based compensation, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company must then record a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, it may need to adjust its valuation allowance which could materially impact its financial position and results of operations.

        Intercompany Service Fees

        The Company has historically paid fees to Mestek, its 86% shareholder, for various services including legal, treasury, tax, employee benefits, insurance, executive oversight and other services. The Company’s historical financial statements reflect these fees which have approximated 1% of net sales in recent years. The fees charged represent estimates of the value of the services provided. The cost to procure these services on a stand-alone basis may differ materially from these estimates.

IMPACT OF INFLATION

        Stainless steel and other related commodities represent a significant portion of the Company’s prime costs. As such, the Company’s margins are vulnerable to inflationary pressures which affect the commodity markets from time to time. Margins were not significantly impacted by such commodity cost increases in 2004 due to the timely implementation of price increases to our customers and to effective hedging of commodity exposures, as explained above. If the rate of inflation continues to climb in 2005, with concurrent interest rate increases, the Company expects that the construction markets and the commodity markets in which it operates could be adversely impacted, thus potentially impacting the Company’s results of operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Twelve Months ended December 31, 2004

        Long-Term Debt increased in 2004 by $3,411,000 reflecting the following:

(in thousands)
Total Debt at December 31, 2003 $        0 
Plus: Mortgage Financing on Exton, PA facility 3,720 
Less: Principal Payments and Current Portion at Year-End (309)
  Total Long-Term Debt at December 31, 2004 $ 3,411 

        The Company’s Long-Term Debt to Equity ratio at December 31, 2004 is 14.2% . The ratio of the Company’s Funded Debt (Long-Term Debt plus Current Portion of Long-Term Debt to Shareholders’ Equity) was 15.0% at December 31, 2004. The ratio of the Company’s Funded Debt at December 31, 2004 to its 2004 Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) was approximately .34 times. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as Operating Profit determined in accordance with GAAP plus Depreciation, Amortization, and Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Expense.

Funded Debt December 31, 2004:  
    Current Portion of Long-Term Debt $186 
    Long-Term Debt 3,411  
  $3,597 

Adjusted EBITDA - 2004:
    Operating Profit $9,206 
    Plus Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation 844 
    Plus Depreciation and Amortization 665  
  $10,715  

Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
.34 

Three months ended March 31, 2005

Long-Term Debt decreased in the first quarter 2005 by $47,000 reflecting the following:

(in thousands)
Long Term Debt at December 31, 2004 $3,411 
Less: Principal Payments during the quarter (47)
  Total Long-Term Debt at March 31, 2005 $3,364  

        The Company’s Long-Term Debt to Equity ratio annualized at March 31, 2005 is 19.2%. The ratio of the Company’s Funded Debt (Long-Term Debt, Current Portion of Long-Term Debt) to Shareholders’ Equity was 20.3 % at March 31, 2005. The ratio of the Company’s Funded Debt at March 31, 2005 to its Adjusted EBITDA (a non-GAAP financial measure) was approximately .32 times. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as Operating Profit determined in accordance with GAAP plus Depreciation, Amortization, and Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation Expense.


Funded Debt March 31, 2005:
 
    Current Portion of Long-Term Debt $186 
    Long-Term Debt 3,364  
  $3,550 

Adjusted EBITDA - 1st Quarter 2005:
    Operating Profit $2,352 
    Plus Non-Cash Stock Based Compensation 228 
    Plus Depreciation and Amortization 167  
  $2,747  

Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
.32 

        As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had no commercial bank line of credit for working capital purposes. The Company has historically relied upon its parent, Mestek, Inc. (Mestek), to provide working capital and other credit as needed through an intercompany account relationship. The Company has consistently transferred more cash to Mestek than it has borrowed resulting in cumulative intercompany receivables from Mestek at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 of $6,503,000, $16,572,000, $14,059,000, respectively. The Company’s intercompany receivable from Mestek includes interest accrued on the average balances outstanding during each quarter at rates which approximate LIBOR plus one percent. The intercompany receivable was reduced in January of 2005 by $9,350,000 in connection with the payment of a dividend to Mestek and the Company’s management shareholders. It is expected that the remaining balance will be reduced prior to the spin-off by a subsequent dividend and the conversion of the then remaining balance to a long-term note receivable from Mestek, all coincident with the planned “Spin-Off” of Omega as more fully described in Note 14. The Company believes it has a number of options available to it relative to third party commercial bank financing and is expecting, in connection with the planned “Spin-Off” of the Company, as more fully described in Note 14 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, to establish a working capital line of credit with a commercial bank coincident with the “Spin-Off” in the amount of $5 million.

        The Company believes its liquidity position as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is fully adequate to meet foreseeable future needs. The Company also believes that it will be able to obtain sufficient working capital lines of credit subsequent to the planned “Spin-Off” to meet its day-to-day needs including any acquisitions or capital expenditures it can reasonably foresee at this time.

        On October 19, 2004, Mestek, the Company’s parent, entered into a multi-bank, $70 million three-year, committed, unsecured revolving loan and letter of credit agreement. Until the date of the Spin-Off, the Company believes that Mestek will continue to make available through this facility, and via the intercompany account described above, sufficient funds to meet the Company’s day-to-day working capital needs.

        The Company is obligated and historically has been obligated, as a guarantor with respect to the debt of Mestek, Inc. under it primary commercial bank line of credit. In accordance with FIN 45, the Company has evaluated the fair value of the guarantee obligation as of March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and concluded that the fair value at these dates was not material and accordingly no liability has been recorded on the books of the Company in respect of the guarantee. As and when the Omega Flex Spin-Off described in more detail in Note 14 is completed, the Company expects that Mestek and its primary commercial banks will agree to terminate the Company’s obligation as guarantor.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

        In January 2003, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns, or both. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a significant variable interest. In December of 2003 FASB issued FIN 46 (R) which, among other things, deferred the consolidation requirements for existing entities until the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The adoption of Fin 46 did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In May 2003 FASB issued FAS 150: Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both liabilities and Equity. FAS 150 established standards for how an issuer classifies and measures in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances ) because that financial instrument embodies and obligation of the issuer. FAS 150 was effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 30, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of non-public entities, which were subject to the provisions of FAS 150 for the first fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company does not believe that it has issued any financial instruments subject to the requirements of FAS 150 and accordingly the adoption of FAS 150 by the Company in 2003 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

        In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which codifies, revises and rescinds certain sections of SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition, in order to make this interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The changes noted in SAB 104 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) was issued in December, 2004. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize the compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions with employees in the financial statements. The compensation cost is measured based upon the fair value of the instrument issued. Share-based compensation transactions with employees covered within SFAS 123R include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

        SFAS 123 included a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees, but allowed companies to continue to apply the guidance in APB 25 provided that they disclose in the footnotes to the financial statements the pro forma net income if the fair-value-based method been applied. The Company is currently reporting share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with APB 25 and provides the required disclosures.

        SFAS 123R will be effective for the Company for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005.

        All public and non public entities that used the fair value based method for either recognition or disclosure under SFAS 123 shall apply the modified prospective application transition method. The modified prospective application transition method requires the application of this standard to:

  o All new awards issued after the effective date;

  o All modifications, repurchased or cancellations of existing awards after the effective date; and

  o Unvested awards at the effective date.

        As there are no unvested awards outstanding as of the date of this report, the Company does not presently expect to recognize any compensation cost in the year of adoption of FAS 123R.

TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Contractual Obligation and Commercial Commitments

        The Company’s primary contractual obligations are summarized in the following table and are more fully explained in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)
December 31, 2004:
Contractual Obligations
Total Less than
1 year
1-3
years
4-5
years
After 5
year
Short Term Debt $         0  $         0  $    0  $    0  $       0 
Long-Term Debt 3,597  186  372  372  2,667 
Purchase Obligations 20,294   20,294   0   0   0  
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $23,891  $20,480  $372  $372  $2,667 

Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)
March 31, 2005:
Contractual Obligations
Total Less than
1 year
1-3
years
4-5
years
After 5
year
Short Term Debt $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Long-Term Debt 3,550  186  372  372  2,620 
Purchase Obligations 15,220   15,220   0   0   0  
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $18,770   $15,406   $372   $372   $2,620  

Off-Balance Sheet Obligations or Arrangements

        The Company is not a party to any off-balance sheet obligations or arrangements.

QUANTITATATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MARKET RISKS

        The Company does not engage in the purchase or trading of market risk sensitive instruments other than commodity forward agreements to hedge a portion of its exposure on commodities it uses in its operations. The Company does not presently have any positions with respect to hedge transactions such as forward contracts relating to currency fluctuations. No market risk sensitive instruments are held for speculative or trading purposes.


DESCRIPTION OF OUR BUSINESS

Overview of the Company

We are a leader in the manufacture and sale of flexible metal hose for applications in conveying various liquids and gases within a number of diverse industries, including construction, transportation, steel, pharmaceutical, and petrochemical. The various product lines include corrugated metal hoses in a broad range of sizes and alloys, including three grades of stainless steel, bronze, Inconel and Hastelloy. We also manufacture a wide range of pressure reinforcing braids for our hoses in both metallic and synthetic constructions. These products are used in a wide variety of applications primarily for the processing industries, transportation industry, medical and semiconductor markets, and for instrumentation, as well as the construction industry.

Industry Overview

The flexible metal hose industry is highly fragmented and diverse, withover 10 companies producing flexible metal hose in the United States, and at least that many in Europe, Japan and Asia. Because of its simple and ubiquitous nature, flexible metal hose can be applied and has been applied to a number of different applications across a broad range of industries.

The major market categories for flexible metallic hose include automotive, aerospace, residential and commercial construction, and general industrial. Omega Flex participates in the latter two, which in the aggregate represent about 50% of the total market opportunity for flexible metallic hose. The major use of corrugated stainless steel tubing in the residential and commercial construction markets is primarily for flexible gas piping and gas appliance connectors and secondarily as pump connectors to isolate vibration in mechanical piping systems in commercial buildings. The general industrial market includes all of the processing industries, the most important of which include primary steel, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, as well as specialty applications for transfer of fluids at both extremely low and high temperatures, (such as the conveying of cryogenic liquids) and a highly fragmented OEM market, as well as a maintenance and repair market.

None of our competitors is dominant in more than one market. We are a leading supplier of flexible metal hose in each of the two broad markets in which we participate.

Development of Business

We were incorporated in 1976 under the name of Tofle America, Inc. as the subsidiary of a Japanese manufacturer of flexible metal hose. For a number of years, we were a manufacturer of flexible metal hose that was sold primarily to customers using the hose for incorporation into finished assemblies for industrial applications. We later changed our name to Omega Flex, Inc., and in 1996, we were acquired by Mestek. In 1997, we introduced our first new product – corrugated stainless steel tubing for use in carrying fuel gas within residential, commercial and industrial buildings. Our growth since 1997 has been primarily as a result of the growth in the use and acceptance of corrugated stainless steel tubing as an alternative to the traditional black iron pipe throughout the construction industry, and through the development of patented fittings and accessories to the corrugated stainless steel tubing that differentiate our systems from those of our competitors.

Overview of Current Business

Products

We have had the most success within the construction industry where our TracPipe®flexible gas piping has enjoyed wide acceptance due to its reliability and durability. Within that industry, the flexible gas piping products that we offer and similar products offered by our competitors face the stiffest challenge from the use of black iron pipe that has traditionally been used by the construction industry in the United States and Canada for the piping of fuel gases within a building. Prior to the introduction of the first corrugated stainless steel piping system in 1989, nearly all construction in the United States and Canada used traditional black iron pipe for gas piping. However, the advantages of corrugated stainless steel tubing in areas subject to high incidence and likelihood of seismic events had been first demonstrated in Japan. In a seismic event, the corrugated stainless steel tubing was shown to withstand the stresses on a piping system created by the shifting and movement of a seismic event better than rigid pipe. However, the advantages of corrugated stainless steel tubing over the traditional black iron pipe also included lower overall installation costs because the corrugated stainless steel tubing can be installed in long uninterrupted lines within the building. The flexibility of the tube allows it to be bent by hand without any tools when a change in direction in the line is required. In contrast, black iron pipe requires that each bend in the pipe have a separate fitting attached. This requires the installer to thread the pipe ends of the black iron pipe, apply an adhesive to the threads, and then screw on the fitting, all of which is labor intensive and costly, including testing and rework if the work is not done properly. As a result of these advantages, corrugated stainless steel tubing now commands approximately one-half of the market for fuel gas piping in new and remodeled residential construction in the United States, and the use of rigid iron pipe and to a lesser degree copper tube, accounts for the other half of the market. We have not yet established a strong presence in the commercial or institutional construction markets in the United States but continue to pursue those opportunities. We are an industry leader in the manufacture and sale of corrugated stainless steel tubing for use in fuel gas applications within residential, commercial and industrial buildings.

From its introduction in 1997, TracPipe® flexible gas piping has grown to be our primary product line, with other applications representing a minor portion of our business . While we remain firmly committed to maintaining a presence in the other applications and markets for flexible metal hose (both because of the opportunities in those applications and because they suggest new markets and new applications), we have increasingly become an organization oriented to the manufacture and distribution of flexible gas piping products. The growth in the flexible gas piping application domestically has superseded the prior technologies represented by traditional black iron pipe or copper tube. We plan to continue our growth through continued inroads against older technologies, both in the United States and overseas in geographic areas that have access to natural gas distribution systems.

As noted below, our flexible metal hose is used in a wide variety of applications besides flexible gas piping. Our involvement in these markets is important because just as the flexible gas piping applications have sprung from our expertise in manufacturing annular metal hose, so other applications may also evolve from our participation in the industry. For example, we currently have several development projects underway in various stages for several new applications, including transportation, high purity gases, and high-pressure applications. The initiatives that generated these development programs all sprang from our involvement across several different industries, but with the same focus of providing high quality flexible metal hose on time and at a competitive price.

Flexible metal hose is also used in a wide variety of industrial and processing applications where the unique characteristics of the flexible hose in terms of its flexibility, and its ability to absorb vibration and thermal expansion and contraction, has unique benefits over rigid piping. Because the range of applications is so varied and numerous, we will provide several illustrative examples in which flexible metal tubing may be used.

In certain pharmaceutical processing applications, the process of developing the specific pharmaceutical may require rapid freezing of various compounds through the use of liquefied gases, such as liquefied nitrogen, helium or Freon. The use of flexible metal tubing is particularly appropriate in these types of applications. Flexible metal hose can accommodate the thermal expansion caused by the liquefied gases carried by it through the hose, and the total length of the hose will not significantly vary. In contrast, fixed or rigid metal pipe would expand and contract along its length as the liquid gases passed through it, causing stresses on the pipe junctions that would over time fatigue and fail.

Within certain industrial or commercial applications using steam, either as a heat source or in the industrial process itself, the pumps used to transfer the liquid or steam within the system are subject to varying degrees of vibration. Flexible metal hoses can be used as connections between the pump and the intake of the fluids being transferred to eliminate the vibration effects of the pumps on the piping transfer system.

Flexible metal hose also obviously offers the benefit of flexibility particularly in handling caustic or acidic compounds. In certain tank transfer applications, where the customer is transporting highly caustic or acidic chemicals or compounds from a static storage tank to a tanker truck, use of fixed pipe systems cannot accommodate transfers into a tanker truck that may not be perfectly aligned with the transfer tank. In these instances, flexible metal hose can accommodate the need to maneuver the transfer hose from the tank to the tanker truck, and also withstand the corrosive characteristics of the chemicals being transferred.

These are just three illustrative examples of the uses of flexible metal hose in several different and unrelated industries. We hold a strong position in these types of applications in terms of being able to offer to our customers engineering assistance with the design and layout of the system, and fabrication of finished assemblies which can be easily incorporated into the customer’s application.

Manufacturing

In each instance, whether the application is for corrugated stainless steel tubing for fuel gases, flexible metal hose for handling specialty chemicals or gases, or unique industrial applications requiring ability to withstand wide variations in temperature and vibration, all of our success rests on the metal hose made by Omega Flex. Most of our flexible metal hoses range in diameter from 1/4" to 2,” while certain applications require diameters of up to 14.” All of our smaller diameter pipe (2” inner diameter and smaller) is made by a proprietary process that is known as the rotary process. The proprietary process that we use to manufacture our annular hose is the result of a long-term development effort begun in 1995. Through continuous improvement, we have over the years developed and fine-tuned the process so that we can manufacture annular flexible metal hose on a high speed, continuous process. This is in contrast to a number of our competitors who use other variations of the rotary process or other methods to manufacture their flexible metal hose – either forming the corrugations in the hose through the use of static dies and presses to form corrugations into the hose, or the hydro-forming process which uses water pressure to expand the hose outward into a mold forming the hose corrugations. The latter two processes require the welding of the end of one hose section to another to create a continuous length of hose. We believe that our own rotary process for manufacturing annular corrugated metal hose is the most cost efficient method in the industry, and that our rotary process provides us with a unique advantage in many of the industries in which we participate. As a result, we are able to provide our product on a demand basis. In December 2004, we achieved a delivery performance to the scheduled ship date of 98% for TracPipe® flexible gas piping. The quick inventory turnover reduces our costs for in-process inventory, and further contributes to our gross margin levels.

Productivity

In addition to the advantages offered by our proprietary manufacturing methods, we are also certified by the International Standards Organization (“ISO”) to its 9001/2000 standard. This means that all of our processes, from manufacturing to engineering to customer service and finance have been documented to establish a baseline of operations within our company. The documented processes are then evaluated as part of a company-wide continuous improvement process to determine the most efficient manner of accomplishing the tasks within the operational procedures. The results of these efforts have led to increases in the level of sales as compared to our number of employees.

The table below illustrates the trend in which increased sales by us of our products has been accomplished over the past three years while our employment levels have remained practically static.

2004 2003 2002

Net Sales (000s)
$48,165  $36,996  $34,963 

Average Employees (actual)
90  88  89 

Amount of Sales per Employee (000s)
$535  $420  $393 

As demonstrated by the above table, we have been able to increase our productivity over the last two years and increase sales while keeping our employment levels static. The increases in productivity have generally arisen both from initiatives to cross-train all personnel, including all factory personnel and office personnel, in more than one position. Within the factory, all shop personnel are trained to operate not only their own machine and function, but are also trained to operate other machinery or functions within the plant. In exchange for completing cross training in one or more areas, factory personnel receive additional compensation in the form of a higher hourly wage, which is a function of their value to us. With numerous factory personnel cross-trained on equipment and functions, our personnel can be deployed where needed either to meet additional demand or to make up for unexpected absences within a department. Furthermore, not only are our factory personnel cross-trained in machinery and equipment, they are also trained in manufacturing methods and data entry so that the person operating the machine is also responsible for entering manufacturing data into our manufacturing resources planning (“MRP”) system. Finally, our factory workforce is also self-directed, with several group leaders responsible for allocating work in their own department, coordinating efforts between departments, and reporting on issues to the plant manager. All of these efforts have reduced the need for additional personnel in terms of management, clerical staff and additional factory personnel. By empowering the employees to manage their own work, by giving them the tools and training necessary to do the work, and by rewarding them for their work, we have been able to increase our productivity each year for the last three years, as shown by the table above.

Our efforts are not confined only to the factory floor. Within each business process in our company, we have striven first to simplify those operations, and to automate the operations to free our employees to concentrate on truly value added activities. For example, within the customer service organization, most of the orders that we receive are entered not by our customer service personnel, but instead are entered into our management system by our independent sales representatives, distributors and wholesalers. These outside sales organizations either solicit the sale of our flexible metal hose products to actual and potential customers, or actually sell the products to our customers. In either case, the outside sales organization has a direct electronic connection to our order entry system. As sales are made or orders are received by the outside sales organization, they enter the order into our system. From there the order is reviewed by one of our customer service representatives, who then approves the order, and passes it into our production queue. The order entry system is downloaded each night to the production system so that the order entry cycle is reduced to a matter of hours. We have also recently introduced a system whereby customers can purchase standard flexible metal hose and accessories from our website. In these transactions, the customer selects the type of product and quantity of product to be purchased, as well as any accessories, and enters their information into our system. All website purchases are paid for by the customer with an accepted credit card at the time the order is released by the customer from the website. Upon verification of the payment of the order by a payment verification service, the order is released to our production system for manufacture and shipment. In this case, the entire order entry transaction occurred without the need for any manual assistance by one of our employees.

These are just two examples that illustrate the methods by which we have achieved our growth in productivity – through training, automation and simplification of the entire process, we have been able to streamline our processes. In 2004, we had a higher sales volume than 2002 by about $13 million, but we were able to accommodate a higher sales volume with the same number of employees.

Raw Materials

We use various materials in the manufacture of our products primarily stainless steel for our flexible metal hose and polyethylene for our jacketing material on TracPipe® flexible gas piping. We also purchase all of our proprietary AutoFlare® brass fittings for use with the TracPipe® flexible gas piping. Although we have multiple sources qualified for all of our major raw materials and components, we have historically used one or two sources of supply for such raw materials and components. Our current orders for stainless steel and fittings are each placed with one or two suppliers. If any one of these sources of supply were interrupted for any reason, then we would have to devote additional time and expense in obtaining the same volume of supply from our other qualified sources. This potential transition, if it were to occur, could affect our operations and financial results during the period of such transition. Commodities markets in general and stainless steel in particular has had significant upward price movement in 2004, resulting in increasing costs to manufacture products and, in some cases, a tightening supply. As stated elsewhere in this information statement, we believe that with our purchase commitments for stainless steel, polyethylene and for our proprietary fittings, that we have adequate sources of supply for these raw materials and components and we have not had significant difficulty in obtaining the raw materials, component parts or finished goods from our suppliers in 2004. We believe that possible constriction in the supply of stainless steel will be alleviated in 2006 as additional global capacity now in progress becomes available. Continued volatility in the commodities marketplace and competitive conditions in the sale of our products may not allow us to pass along raw materials or component part price increases to our customers.

Business Seasonality

The demand for our TracPipe® flexible gas piping product may be affected by the construction industry’s demand, which generally may slacken in the winter months of each year due to cold and inclement weather. Accordingly, sales growth is usually higher in the spring, summer and fall, while sales in the winter may be static or rise only modestly. However, the effect of the winter weather may be offset by the increase in demand for flexible gas piping products in general as more contractors and installers choose to use flexible gas piping rather than black iron pipe.

Customers

We sell our products to customers scattered across a wide and diverse set of industries from construction to pharmaceutical with over 4,800 active customers. These sales channels include sales through independent sales representatives, distributors, original equipment manufacturers, direct sales, and sales through our website on the internet. We utilize various distribution companies in the sale of our TracPipe® flexible gas piping, including Ferguson Enterprises and many other distributors, and these distribution customers in the aggregate represent a material portion of our business. All of this business is done on a purchase order basis for immediate resale commitments or stocking, and there are no long-term purchase commitments. In the event we were to lose an account, we would not expect any long-term reduction in our sales due to the broad end user acceptance of our products. We would anticipate that in the event of a loss of any one or more distributors, that after an initial transition period, the sale of our products would resume at or near their historical levels. Furthermore, in the case of certain national distribution chains like Ferguson and other distributors, it is possible that there would continue to be purchasing activity from one or more regional or branch distribution customers. We sell our products within North America, primarily in the United States and Canada, and we also sell our products internationally, primarily in Europe through our sales office located outside of London, England.

Distribution of Sales

As mentioned previously, we sell our products primarily through independent outside sales organizations, including independent sales representatives, distributors, fabricating distributors, wholesalers, and OEMs. We have a limited internal sales function that sells our products to key accounts, including OEMs and distributors of bulk hose. We believe that within each geographic market in which the independent sales representative, distributor or wholesaler is located that our outside sales organizations are the first or second most successful outside sales organization for the particular product line within that geographic area.

Competition

There are approximately a dozen manufacturers of metal hose in the United States, approximately that number in Europe, several in South America, and six to eight in the Far East. The U. S. manufacturers include Titeflex Corporation, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Ward Manufacturing, Truflex, Microflex, Flexonics, Hose Master, and several smaller privately held companies. No one manufacturer, as a general rule, participates in more than two of the major market categories as outlined above with most concentrating in just one. We estimate that we hold a number one or number two share position in the two major market categories in which we participate. In the flexible gas piping market, the U.S. market is currently concentrated in the residential housing market, and based on the reports issued by the national trade groups on housing construction, the level of acceptance of flexible gas piping in the construction market, and the average usage of flexible gas piping in a residential building, we are able to estimate with a high level of accuracy the size of the total gas piping market, and based on our sales our position within that market. For other applications, industry trade groups collect and report on the size of the relevant market, and we can estimate our percentage of the relevant market based on our sales as compared to the market as a whole. The larger of our two markets, the construction industry, has also been the fastest growing. As discussed elsewhere, iron pipe or copper tube was historically used by all builders of commercial and residential buildings until the advent of flexible gas piping and changes in the relevant building codes. Since that time, flexible gas piping has taken an increasing share of the total amount of fuel gas piping used in construction, until at present we estimate that flexible gas piping is approximately one-half of the market for the residential component, but significantly less for commercial. Within the flexible gas piping market, we compete against five other manufacturers of flexible metal hose, including Titeflex, Parker Hannifin, and Wardflex.

In the industrial market, due to the number of applications in which flexible metal hose may be used, and the number of companies engaged in the manufacture and sale of flexible metal hose, the market is very fragmented, and we estimate that no one company has a predominant market share of the business over other competitors. The general industrial markets within Europe are very mature and tend to offer opportunities which are interesting to us in niche markets or during periods in which a weak dollar increases the demand for our products on a competitive basis. Such has been the case for several years and has created new relationships for us. Currently, we do not engage in the manufacture of our products outside of the United States, but continue to review these opportunities as demand for our products continues to grow. Currently, we are not heavily engaged in the manufacture of flexible metal hose for the aerospace or transportation markets, but we continue to review opportunities in all markets for our products to determine appropriate applications that will provide growth potential and high margins. In some cases, where the product offering is considered a commodity, price is the overriding competing factor. In other cases, a proprietary product offering or superior performance will be the major factors with pricing being secondary and in some cases, a non-factor. The majority of our sales are to distributors and wholesalers, and our relationships with these customer are on an arms-length basis in that neither we nor the customers are so dependent on the other to yield any significant business advantage. From our perspective, we are able to maintain a steady demand for our products due to the broad acceptance of our products by end users, regardless of which distributor or wholesaler sells the product.

Backlog

Management does not believe that backlog figures are material to an understanding of our business because most products are shipped promptly after the receipt of orders.

Intellectual Property

We have a large portfolio of intellectual property, including 92 patents issued in 23 countries around the world. The patents primarily cover the fittings used by the flexible gas piping to join the piping to a junction, assembly or appliance. Our AutoFlare® fitting is the leading fitting for use with flexible gas piping because it offers a metal-to-metal seal between the fitting and the tubing, and because of its robustness and ease of use. The metal-to-metal contact provides for a longer lasting and more reliable seal than fittings which use gaskets or sealing compounds that can deteriorate over time. In applications involving fuel gases in a building, the ability to maintain the seal and prevent the leaking of such gases over long periods of time is valued by our customers. Finally, and as mentioned above, our unique rotary process for manufacturing flexible metal hose has been developed over the last ten years, and constitutes a valuable trade secret which we guard assiduously. The expiration dates for the several patents covering our AutoFlare® fittings will expire between 2016 and 2020.

We currently have several patent applications pending in the United States and internationally covering improvements to our AutoFlare® fittings. We are currently engaged in two separate civil cases to protect our intellectual property rights. In one case currently pending in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, we have sued a flexible gas pipe competitor for infringement on one or more of our U.S. patents covering our AutoFlare® fittings used to connect the ends of the flexible gas piping. In another case pending in the Court of Common Pleas in Chester County, Pennsylvania, we have sued a former employee and a flexible metal hose competitor to enjoin the disclosure of our trade secrets covering our proprietary rotary manufacturing process. Both cases are currently pending in their respective venues. See “Description of our Business – Legal Proceedings” for a more detailed description of the litigation.


Research and Development

Our business has grown over the last seven years through a concerted and consistent effort on new product development. This has been especially true in the TracPipe® product line which only launched eight years ago, and which now accounts for a substantial portion of our revenues. As is evident from the discussion regarding our existing product lines, the ability of flexible metal tubing to serve a wide variety of functions lends itself particularly well to the development of new applications. Since the introduction of corrugated stainless steel tubing for use in fuel gas applications, we have also participated in the development of flexible metal tubing for new applications in areas such as transportation, high purity gases and high-pressure environments. The applications being developed require extensive long-term work with applicable code agencies and product certifying agencies that review the ability of the products to achieve adequate assurances that the product will meet all safety and performance standards. Set forth below is a summary of the expenditures we have made in the past three years in research and development, including development of existing applications. As can be seen from the table below, our spending on research and development has been modest. This is due to the fact that we have kept the bulk of the development effort within our engineering department, and have used our internal resources very judiciously and effectively. The development efforts are also focused on products in which we can utilize our strengths in designing and making flexible metal hose. Our development staff are also responsible for other duties, including product engineering and manufacturing engineering. As a result of their experience in these other fields, our product development efforts are effectively focused on an end product that is useful to our customers and can be economically manufactured. These amounts are reflected in Engineering expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

2004 2003 2002

Research & Development spending (000's)
$505  $719  $547 

Percentage of annual net sales
1.05% 1.94% 1.56%

Employees

As of March 31, 2005, we had 100 employees. Most of our employees are located in our main facility in Exton, Pennsylvania, which is currently our sole manufacturing facility, and which contains our engineering, finance, human resources and most sales personnel. Our factory workforce in Exton, Pennsylvania is not represented by a collective bargaining agent. We also maintain an office in Westfield, Massachusetts where five employees in management and sales are primarily assigned. We sublease our Westfield offices from Mestek. A number of individual sales personnel are scattered across the United States. We also maintain a sales office in the United Kingdom just outside of London, and that office has a total of four people, with several additional individual sales personnel operating within the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom sales personnel handle all sales and service for our products in Europe.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently engaged in several legal proceedings instituted by persons making claims against us involving claims of bodily injury or property damage, and do not expect that any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial results because plaintiffs’ allegations of product failure have not been substantiated. In addition, we have instituted legal proceedings in two cases to protect our intellectual property rights, and these cases do not pose a potential financial liability against us. We are also engaged in one litigation matter that was filed in the Clark County Circuit Court, in Arkansas, alleging that our corrugated stainless steel tubing product TracPipe®, and similar products manufactured by several other manufacturers (also named as defendants in the case) is defective, or that instructions, warnings and training in the installation of corrugated stainless steel tubing are defective, against potential damage to the corrugated stainless steel tubing systems caused by the nearby lightning strikes. The plaintiffs in this case have named three other corrugated stainless steel tubing manufacturers, and one plumber residing in Arkansas, as defendants in this matter, and are seeking class action certification as representatives of all similarly situated persons in the United States, or in the alternative, in Arkansas and Texas, pursuant to the Arkansas rules of civil procedure. The case has only recently been filed, and no determinations have been made as of the date of this information statement whether to dismiss the case, or whether to certify the class either within the United States, or within the states of Texas and Arkansas. We believe that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and are defending the matter vigorously. At this time there is no ability to estimate the cost of defense or potential damages related to this matter

We are currently engaged in two separate civil cases to protect our intellectual property rights. In one case currently pending in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, we have sued a flexible gas pipe competitor for infringement on one or more of our U.S. patents covering our AutoFlare® fittings used to connect the ends of the flexible gas piping. We have alleged that the competitor has infringed on one or more of our patents covering the AutoFlare® fittings by including certain patented features in the competitor’s fitting, including a locator sleeve that makes it easier to align the connection. We have filed dispositive motions on this matter, and as of the date of this information statement, those motions are currently pending before the court.

In another case pending in the Court of Common Pleas in Chester County, Pennsylvania, we have sued a former employee and a flexible metal hose competitor to enjoin the disclosure of our trade secrets covering our proprietary rotary manufacturing process. In this case, a former long-term employee left our company to work for a competitor who is engaged in the flexible metal hose market. The former employee had been involved in the development and/or refinement of aspects of the rotary process manufacturing method, and had detailed knowledge of our trade secrets concerning this manufacturing method. We filed suit to enjoin any disclosure of our trade secrets by the former employee to his new employer, to enforce certain terms of an employment agreement previously signed by the former employee, and to obtain damages for any unauthorized disclosure or misappropriation of our trade secrets. As of the date of this information statement, this matter is still in discovery, but it is expected that a trial will be held some time in the third quarter of 2005.

Property

Our main facility is located in Exton, Pennsylvania about one hour west of Philadelphia and contains about 83,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space. We lease our Exton facility from Exton Ranch, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary. We lease additional non-manufacturing space of approximately 5,000 sq. ft. in Downingtown, Pennsylvania approximately 5 miles from the main plant. All manufacturing of our flexible metal hose is done at the Exton facility. The corporate offices of Omega Flex, Inc. in Westfield, Massachusetts and Omega Flex Limited in High Wycombe, United Kingdom, are rented. The lease for the Westfield Massachusetts is currently on a month-to-month basis. The High Wycombe lease is for about 500 square feet and expires in 2009.

Environmental

Our manufacturing processes do not require the use of significant quantities of hazardous substances or materials, and therefore we are able to operate our Exton facility as a “small quantity generator” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 321 et seq. As a result, compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws do not pose a material burden on our business, and we are not required to expend any material amounts on capital expenditures for environmental control facilities for our manufacturing facility.


OUR MANAGEMENT

Our Directors and Executive Officers

We expect that our board of directors following the distribution will be comprised of approximately seven to nine directors. Our board of directors is currently comprised of nine members; John E. Reed, Mestek’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Kevin R. Hoben, President of Omega Flex, Mark F. Albino, Senior Vice President of Omega Flex, Bruce C. Klink, Vice President – Pricing & Business Development for Dominion Resources, Inc., a diversified energy producer, David K. Evans, Construction Manager for American Residential Services, LLC, a construction company, Stewart B. Reed, a private investor and son of John E. Reed, David W. Hunter, Chairman of Hunter & Associates, Edward J. Trainor, Chairman of Standex Corporation, and Lawrence J. Cianciolo, who is presently an attorney and tax consultant in private practice. Messrs. JE Reed, SB Reed, Hunter and Trainor are also directors of Mestek and we expect that they will retain their positions with Mestek, and that Mr. JE Reed will remain as Chairman of Mestek, after the distribution. In anticipation of the distribution and the responsibilities of being a publicly traded company, at a meeting on March 14, 2005, the board reconstituted itself from its prior incarnation (as a subsidiary of Mestek) into an independent board that complies with the regulatory and listing requirements of independence from management. The independent directors, as defined in the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules consist of the following directors: Bruce C. Klink, David K. Evans, David W. Hunter, Edward J. Trainor, and Lawrence J. Cianciolo. Our Board of Directors are divided into three classes. Approximately one third of the Directors will be Class I directors, with terms expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2006, approximately one third will be Class II directors with terms expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2007 and approximately one third will be Class III directors with terms expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2008. Commencing with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2006, directors for each class will be elected at the annual meeting of shareholders held in the year in which the term for that class expires and thereafter will serve for a term of three years.

        The following table sets forth information as to persons who currently serve as our directors or officers.

Name Age Position with Omega Flex

John E. Reed
89  Chairman of the Board
Stewart B. Reed 57  Director
Kevin R. Hoben 58  President & Chief Executive Officer
Mark F. Albino 52  Senior Vice President - Manufacturing & Engineering
*Bruce C. Klink 54  Director
*David K. Evans 50  Director
*David W. Hunter 75  Director
*Edward J. Trainor 64  Director
*Lawrence J. Cianciolo 62  Director

*independent directors

          Director Biographies

John E. Reed, Age 89

    Mr. J.E. Reed is our current Chairman of the Board of Directors and had been Chairman, since 1997. He is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mestek and has served as a Mestek director since 1986. From 1986 until 1989 he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Mestek, and prior to the 1986 merger of Mestek and Reed National Corp., had been President and Chief Executive Officer of Reed since he founded it in 1946. Mr. Reed is also a director of CareCentric, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, and Wainwright Bank & Trust Co., Boston, Massachusetts.

Stewart B. Reed, Age 57

        Through April 1996, Mr. S.B. Reed was formerly employed as the Executive Vice President of Mestek and he now serves as a consultant to Mestek on acquisitions, labor and employment matters. Prior to the 1986 merger of Mestek and Reed National Corp., Mr. Reed had been Executive Vice President of Reed in charge of corporate development. Mr. Reed had been employed by Reed since 1970. Mr. Reed is a director of CareCentric, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Reed is the son of John E. Reed, our Chairman of the Board.

Kevin R. Hoben, Age 58

    Mr. Hoben is currently President of Omega Flex, and has served in that position since 1996. Mr. Hoben also has served as our director since 1996 and as a director and chairman of our United Kingdom subsidiary, Omega Flex Limited, since 2001. Prior to joining Omega Flex, Mr. Hoben served in a number of senior executive positions with TiteFlex Corporation, a manufacturer of flexible metal hose located in Springfield, Massachusetts. Mr. Hoben is also a trustee of Williston-Northampton School, a private secondary school in Easthampton, Massachusetts.

Mark F. Albino, Age 52

    Mr. Albino is currently Senior Vice President, a position he has held since joining us in 1996. Mr. Albino has served as our director since 1996, and has also served as director of Omega Flex Limited since 2001. Prior to his joining us, Mr. Albino held a variety of positions in manufacturing and engineering with TiteFlex Corporation and Western Consolidated Technologies.

Bruce C. Klink, Age 54

    Mr. Klink is Vice President – Pricing & Business Development for Dominion Resources, Inc., a diversified energy producer headquartered in Richmond, Virginia since 2000. Mr. Klink previously held a number of executive positions primarily in senior positions for pricing and regulatory affairs with Consolidated Natural Gas from 1983 to 1999 prior to its acquisition by Dominion Resources, and prior to that, held a variety of positions in accounting, auditing, and regulatory affairs.

David K. Evans, Age 50

    Mr. Evans is currently the Construction Manager of American Residential Services, LLC, a large construction company headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina since 2000. Previously, he held a number of positions with Metro Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. of Raleigh, North Carolina prior to its acquisition by ARS, including General Manager of from 1999 to 2000, Assistant General Manager from 1997 to 1998, and other managerial positions from 1992 to 1997. Mr. Evans previously held a number of senior executive positions at TD Industries, Inc. of Dallas, Texas from 1989 to 1992.

David W. Hunter, Age 75

    Mr. Hunter has been Chairman of Hunter Associates, Inc., an investment-banking firm in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania since 1992. From 1990 to 1992 he was Chairman Emeritus of Parker/Hunter, Inc., an investment-banking firm in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he was Chairman from 1978 until 1990. Mr. Hunter is also a Director of Lockhart Companies, Kiene Diesel Accessories, Inc., Justifacts, and Quanterra, Inc. He served as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. from 1986 to 1987. Mr. Hunter is also a director of Mestek

Edward J. Trainor, Age 63

    Mr. Trainor is currently Chairman of the Board of Standex International Corporation (NYSE: SXI) and was formerly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Standex from 2001 to 2002, was President and Chief Executive Officer of Standex from 1995 to 2001, and was President of Standex from 1994 to 1995. Prior to joining Standex, Mr. Trainor held a variety of executive positions with Kodak Corporation in engineering and manufacturing. Mr. Trainor is also a director of Mestek, and is a director of Formtek, Inc., one of Mestek’s subsidiaries.

Lawrence J. Cianciolo, Age 62

    Mr. Cianciolo is currently an attorney and tax consultant in private practice in New Hartford, Connecticut and has been in private practice since 2001. He previously was the Vice President – Tax of Grolier Incorporated from 1991 to 2001 and was Assistant Treasurer from 1980 to 1991. Mr. Cianciolo also worked at Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co. in its tax department from 1976 to 1980.


Executive Officer Biographies

E. Lynn Wilkinson, Age 61

    Mr. Wilkinson joined Omega Flex in 1996, initially as a consultant and subsequently as Vice President – Finance, a position he has held since 1998 and Treasurer of our subsidiaries, Omega Flex, Ltd. since 2001, and Exton Ranch since 2003. He has previously served in similar positions with Western Rubber Company from 1994 to 1996, as a small business financial consultant with Wilkinson & Associates from 1990 to 1993, and Titeflex Corporation dating from 1980 to 1989. He holds a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Indiana University and passed the Certified Public Accounting Exam in 1975, and subsequently passed the Certified Internal Auditor and Certified Management Accounting exams.

Steven A. Treichel, Age 54

    Mr. Treichel is currently the Vice President – TracPipe® Operations where he is responsible for engineering for the TracPipe® product line and research and development. Mr. Treichel has held this position since 2002. Previously he served as Vice President of the company in manufacturing and in engineering from 1990 to 2002, and prior to that, he was Plant Manager and Process Engineer from 1984 to 1990. Prior to joining Omega Flex, Steve held a number of managerial positions at American Flexible Hose Company from 1978 to 1984, in manufacturing of metal hose fabrication, welding and assembly.

Bernard E. Quinlan, Age 52

    Mr. Quinlan is currently Managing Director of OmegaFlex Limited, our English subsidiary, a position he has held since 2003, and was previously General Manager from 2000-2003. Previously he served in a number of senior executive positions with Senior Flexonics from 1993 to 2000, and in a number of manufacturing and executive positions with TI Group from 1975 to 1993. Mr. Quinlan has a degree in Chemical Engineering, with an industrial year at the Brewing Industry Research Foundation.

Annual Meeting

        Our first annual meeting of shareholders after the distribution is expected to be held in Spring 2006. This will be an annual meeting of shareholders for the election of directors. The annual meeting will be held at our principal office or at such other place or by electronic means as permitted by the Pennsylvania laws and on such date as may be fixed from time to time by resolution of our board of directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

        We have established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating/governance committee, each of which will be comprised solely of independent directors except as noted below.

         Audit Committee. The audit committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The functions of this committee includes:

  assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight of the accounting and financial controls of the Company, and the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

  selecting the independent auditors, reviewing the scope of the audit and the results of the audit, approving permitted non-audit services (such as tax services);

  reviewing the organization and scope of the Company's Internal Audit Staff and its financial and disclosure controls procedures; and

  overseeing management’s efforts to establish and maintain a process for handling complaints or concerns relating to accounting or financial matters, as well as compliance issues generally.

        Both of our independent auditors and internal audit personnel will have regular private meetings with this committee and will have unrestricted access to this committee.

         Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The functions of this committee will include:

  reviewing and, as it deems appropriate, determining policies, practices and procedures relating to the compensation of our executive officers and the establishment and administration of our employee benefit plans;

  advising and consulting with our officers regarding managerial personnel and development.

         Nominating/Governance Committee. Our nominating/governance committee is comprised of two independent directors and one non-independent director. The functions of this committee will include:

  adopting qualifications by which to evaluate potential candidates to the Board.

  recommending candidates for election to the Board by the shareholders, or by the Board to fill any vacancies.

  adopting a set of guidelines for the corporate governance of the company.

Corporate Governance

        In response to recent federal legislation and NASDAQ initiatives, we have:

  o adopted charters for the audit committee, compensation committee and nominating/governance committee;

  o adopted corporate governance guidelines;

  o adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees;

  o confirmed that a majority of our board of directors, as well as all members of each of the audit committee and compensation committee, and a majority of the nominating/governance committee, are independent as defined by applicable and proposed listing standards of the NASDAQ and SEC rules; and

  o confirmed that at least one member of the audit committee possess training, education and experience in finance or accounting resulting in a level of financial sophistication as required by applicable NASDAQ rules.

Director Compensation

        Our director compensation for our non-employee directors is as follows:

  o annual cash retainer of $6,000

  o $1,500 for attending each board meeting,

  o $500 for each committee member attending a committee meeting,

  o $2,000 for additional retainer for members of the Audit Committee, and o $2,000 for additional retainer for each chairman of a committee.

        Directors who are also our employees, or employees of Mestek, will receive no additional compensation for their services as directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        We did not have any compensation committee interlocks wherein the executive officers of two different public companies each serve on the compensation committee of the other public company. The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors with no insider participation, except for the CEO’s compensation recommendations for the other executive officers.

Executive Compensation

        The Compensation Committee will be responsible for administering the compensation program for our executive officers.

        Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain the executive talent needed to optimize shareholder value in a competitive environment. Our executive compensation program is designed to provide:

  o levels of base compensation that are competitive with comparable manufacturing companies;

  o annual bonus compensation that is a function of the achievement of individual and financial performance objectives; and

  o long-term incentive compensation that focuses executive efforts on building shareholder value through meeting longer-term financial and strategic goals.

        In designing and administering our executive compensation program, we attempt to strike an appropriate balance among these various elements.

         Base Salary. Base salary is determined by an assessment of sustained performance against individual job responsibilities and includes, where appropriate, an analysis of the impact of the executive’s performance on our business results, the executive’s current salary in relation to the salary range designated for the job and the executive’s potential for advancement.

         Bonus Incentives. Payments under our annual employee bonus policy are made on the basis of the respective participation percentage of each employee eligible and participating in the bonus program and on the targets for the specified return on average net assets employed for us. The percentage assigned by the compensation committee to each of the participating executive officers is made by reference to his or her level of performance, responsibility and contribution to our profitability. The performance-based bonus earned by the executive officers under the employee bonus policy is based on their respective participation percentage in our operating profits in excess of a specified return on average net assets employed. The specified return targets for the employee bonus policy for 2004 was a twenty percent (20%) return.

         Long-term Incentives. Our long-term incentives will be primarily in the form of stock option awards, supplemental executive retirement plans, and change in control agreements. However, restricted stock may also be granted on a selected basis to attract, retain and motivate key executives critical to our long-term success. We may or may not use any one or all of these methods for our executive compensation. The objective of these awards is to advance our longer-term interests and those of our shareholders and to complement incentives tied to annual performance. These awards will provide rewards to executives based upon the creation of incremental shareholder value.

        Stock options will only produce value to executives if the price of our stock appreciates, thereby directly linking the interests of executives with those of shareholders. The number of stock options granted will be based on the level of an executive’s position, the executive’s performance in the prior year and the executive’s potential for continued sustained contributions to our success. There have not been any stock options granted since April 1996.


          Interest of Certain Persons in or Opposition to Matters to be Acted Upon

        John E. Reed, Mestek’s chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, also serves as our chairman. Stewart B. Reed, a consultant of Mestek, also serves as a director on our board. David W. Hunter, a director of Mestek, also serves as a director on our board. Edward J. Trainor, a director of both Mestek and of Formtek, Inc., a subsidiary of Mestek, also serves as a director on our board.

        John E. Reed currently beneficially owns approximately 0% of Omega Flex and 37.63% of Mestek. Upon completion of the distribution, Mr. Reed will be the beneficial owner of approximately 32.98% of the outstanding common stock of Omega Flex. Stewart B. Reed currently beneficially owns approximately 0% of Omega Flex and 25.06% of Mestek. Upon completion of the distribution, Stewart B. Reed will be the beneficial owner of approximately 21.95% of the outstanding common stock of Omega Flex.

          Summary Compensation Table

        The following table summarizes the compensation earned for services rendered to us in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 by our Chief Executive Officer and the four most highly compensated executive officers.

Annual compensation(2)
Name and
Principal Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary Bonus (1) All Other
Compensation
(3)(4)

Kevin R. Hoben, President
2004 $155,427  $460,000  $12,067 
and Chief Executive Officer (5) 2003 $145,131  $385,395  $11,621 
2002 $139,365  $210,000  $11,367 

Mark F. Albino,
2004 $125,211  $350,000  $11,066 
Senior Vice President (6) 2003 $117,211  $293,500  $11,031 
2002 $112,538  $160,000  $11,508 

Steven A. Treichel,
2004 $107,638  $175,000  $10,607 
Vice President 2003 $100,716  $150,000  $10,253 
2002 $96,155  $110,000  $10,663 

E. Lynn Wilkinson,
2004 $97,976  $125,000  $11,697 
Vice President-Finance & CFO 2003 $92,499  $110,000  $10,661 
2002 $89,084  $70,000  $8,230 

Bernard E. Quinlan, Managing
2004 $138,653  $45,885  $2,289 
Director, Omega Flex, Ltd. (7) 2003 $109,345  $26,470  $1,679 
2002 $100,011  $10,072  $2,052 

Notes to Summary Compensation Table

  (1)  All our officers, and certain other key employees involved in our operations, historically have been paid annual bonuses based on the profitability of the business (“Bonus Policy”). Under the Bonus Policy, the bonus for an eligible executive officer is equal to a percentage (which may be different for each participant) of the amount by which our operating profits in each fiscal year exceed a specified return on the average net assets employed by us. The target in 2004 for return on average net assets employed was 20%. Messrs. Hoben, Albino, Treichel and Wilkinson were awarded bonuses under the Bonus Policy for 2004.

  (2) In accordance with the revised rules on executive officer compensation adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, amounts of Other Annual Compensation for 2002, 2003, and 2004 (which would include the incremental costs to us of perquisites and personal benefits paid to any executive officer), are excluded because they are less than $50,000 or less than 10% of the total annual salary and bonus compensation for each of the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table. Such perquisites may include, among others, the compensation attributable to the personal use of a Company automobile and compensation attributable to personal use of club memberships primarily used for business purposes.

  (3) In accordance with the revised rules on executive officer compensation adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, amounts of All Other Compensation for 2002, 2003, and 2004 include: the cost of premiums for life insurance and AD&D having a benefit in excess of $50,000 under which we are not a beneficiary; the costs to us of the contributions by us to each executive officer under the 401(k) Plan sponsored by us or Mestek (whereby we match each $1.00 of employee contribution with $0.25 up to the first 6% of salary and bonus); and our contributions on behalf of each executive officer to the profit sharing plan sponsored by us or Mestek, whereby we contribute three percent (3%) of annual base salary up to the OASDI maximum of $87,900 (in 2004) and six percent (6%) of annual base salary for amounts of compensation in excess of the OASDI maximum of $87,900 for 2004 (as limited in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act) and includes amounts to a defined benefit plan for employees of our U.K. subsidiary.

  (4) In accordance with the revised rules on executive compensation adopted by the SEC, amounts of long-term compensation have been omitted from the summary compensation table because there have been no grants of stock option awards, supplemental executive retirement plans, change in control agreements or restricted stock units to any of our executive officers in the fiscal years 2004, 2003 or 2002.

  (5) Mr. Hoben is employed under an agreement with us which is automatically extended for one-year periods unless we issue a six-month notice of termination, or Mr. Hoben issues a three-month notice of termination. The contract specifies a certain base salary to be reviewed annually by our Board of Directors . The base salary under this contract for 2004 was $155,000. The contract stipulates that Mr. Hoben was eligible to participate in the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan, and pursuant to the Plan and the vote of the Board, Mr. Hoben received an option in 1996 to purchase 100 shares (on a pre-split basis) of our common stock at $9,000 per share. Mr. Hoben exercised his option to acquire such shares in 2004. The contract provides for severance of one year’s salary if Mr. Hoben is discharged without cause, or severance of one month’s salary if he is discharged for cause. The contract provides for Mr. Hoben to be furnished with the use of a Company automobile and to be reimbursed for legitimate business expenses.

  (6) Mr. Albino is employed under an agreement with us which is automatically extended for one-year periods unless we issue a six-month notice of termination, or Mr. Albino issues a three-month notice of termination. The contract specifies a certain base salary to be reviewed annually by our Board of Directors . The base salary under this contract for 2004 was $125,000. The contract stipulated that Mr. Albino was eligible to participate in the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan, and pursuant to the Plan and the vote of the Board, Mr. Albino received an option to purchase 40 shares (on a pre-split basis) of our common stock at $9,000 per share. Mr. Albino exercised his option to acquire such shares in 2004.

  (7) Salary, bonus and certain personal benefits paid to Mr. Quinlan are paid in U.K. pounds sterling. To provide comparability, we have converted such amount to U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate of £1.8354, £1.5126, and £1.4388 for the years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.


Aggregate Stock Options Exercised in 2004, and December 31, 2004 Option Value

The following table provides information, for the five most highly compensated executive officers, on previously granted stock options exercised last year; and on stock option holdings at the end of 2004. There were no stock options granted in 2004.

Number of Shares
Acquired upon
Number of shares underlying
unexercised options(3)
Value of unexercised
in-the-money Options
Name of Executive Exercise of
Options (1)
$ Value
Realized (2)
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable

Kevin R. Hoben
100  $1,965,600 

Mark F. Albino
40  $786,240 

Steven A. Treichel

E. Lynn Wilkinson

Bernard E. Quinlan
(1)                     Shown on a pre-split basis.

(2)                     Value is the difference between the book value on a per share basis of our common stock as of June 30, 2004 and the exercise price of the options.

(3)              All options granted under the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan have been exercised, and the Plan has been terminated by the board of directors as of October 31, 2004.

Employment Agreements

        As of the date of this information statement, we have entered into employment agreements with Kevin Hoben, President of Omega Flex and Mark Albino, Senior Vice President.

         Position and Base Salary. Mr. Hoben’s employment agreement was entered into in 1996 when Mr. Hoben first joined us. The Agreement provides that he will serve as our President and will receive an annual base salary that is currently set at $155,000, which amount may be reviewed at least annually and may be adjusted from time to time by our board of directors.

         Employee Benefits & Perquisites. Mr. Hoben is also entitled to participate in the incentive compensation plan, and to receive employee benefits generally provided by us to our employees in accordance with the terms of such employee benefit plants. Mr. Hoben was eligible to participate in the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan, and pursuant to the Plan and by a vote of the board of directors, he received an option to purchase 100 shares of our common stock (at pre-distribution levels) at a price of $9,000 per share. Mr. Hoben exercised his option to acquire such shares in 2004, and the shares were issued in October 2004 upon payment of the option price. Finally, the agreement provides that Mr. Hoben will have the use of an automobile purchased or leased by us.

         Term.        The term of Mr. Hoben’s employment agreement was for an initial three year term which expired in 1999. The agreement is now for consecutive terms of one year which are automatically renewed unless we give a six month termination notice to Mr. Hoben.

        Restrictive Covenants. Mr. Hoben is obligated by the Agreement not to disclose our confidential or proprietary information. During the term of the Agreement and for one year following the termination of the agreement, Mr. Hoben is under an obligation not to compete with us, or to solicit our customers for any third party. While employed by us and for three years after termination of his agreement, Mr. Hoben may not solicit any of our employees for any third party.

Termination

  o If we terminate the agreement for “cause,” Mr. Hoben will be entitled to one-twelfth of his annual salary as severance, but he will not receive any other compensation or benefits after the effective date of his termination for “cause,” except for any bonus earned, but not yet paid under the agreement.

  o If we elect not to extend the term of the agreement, Mr. Hoben will receive as severance an amount equal to his then current annual salary, payable in 26 bi-weekly installments, and shall receive for one year following termination medical and dental benefits without cost, and continued use of a car provided by us.

  o If Mr. Hoben elects to terminate the agreement (other than upon breach of the agreement by us), he shall provide three months’ prior written notice of such termination. Upon termination, he will not be entitled to any further compensation or benefits, except for any bonus earned but not yet paid under the agreement.

        The employment agreement defines “cause” to include among other things, acts of dishonesty or fraud resulting in damage to us, embezzlement or theft of our assets, material breach of the agreement, or conviction of Mr. Hoben of any felony resulting in damage to us.

        Mr. Albino’s employment agreement with us was contemporaneous with Mr. Hoben’s employment agreement, and is substantially similar to Mr. Hoben’s, except as noted below.

  o Mr. Albino is to serve as the Senior Vice President-Manufacturing & Engineering, at an annual base salary that is currently set at $125,000.

  o Mr. Albino received an option to acquire 40 shares (on a pre-split basis) of our common stock. The option was exercised in October 2004, the shares paid for at the option price of $9,000 per share, and the shares issued.

  o Mr. Albino does not have the use of a company vehicle.

  o If the agreement is not extended by us, Mr. Albino will not receive any further compensation or benefits after the effective date of the termination, except for any bonus earned but not yet paid under the agreement.

        We entered into a shareholder agreement in 1996 with Mestek, Inc. and the above officers that imposed certain restrictions on the transfer of any shares acquired by such officer in connection with the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan, and that also provided for rights by us to “call,” or the officers to “put,” such shares to or from the other party at a per share price based upon our book value. It is expected that this agreement will be terminated immediately preceding the effective date of the distribution and the officers’ “put” rights, and our “call” rights will likewise be affirmatively terminated.

        The following summarizes the material provisions of the employee benefits plans we intend to adopt prior to the distribution. The terms of these plans have not been finalized and are being reviewed by Mestek and us.

401(k) Plan

        We expect to establish a 401(k) plan, similar to the one we have in place through Mestek, that will permit participating employees to contribute a portion of their compensation to the plan on a pre-tax basis. We will make matching contributions to the plan. Generally, participants’ contributions, up to 6% of compensation, will qualify for a 25% match. The plan will also have a discretionary profit sharing contribution feature. The amount of profit sharing contributions allocated to each participant under the plan will be a percentage of the employee’s annual wages, with appropriate adjustments for annual wages that exceed the OASDI maximum. The accounts of our employees under the Mestek, Inc. Savings and Retirement Plan will be transferred from such plans to our 401(k) plan after the distribution.

        The 401(k) plan accounts will be invested by the trustee under the 401(k) plan among a number of available investment options according to the directions of participating employees.

        The 401(k) plan will be designed to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions by employees or by us to the 401(k) plan and income earned on plan contributions will not be taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) plan, and so that contributions by us, if any, will be deductible by us when made. We will retain the right to amend or terminate the 401(k) plan at any time.

Incentive Compensation Plan

        Payments under our annual employee bonus policy are made on the basis of the respective participation percentage of each employee eligible and participating in the bonus program and on the targets for the specified return on average net assets employed for us. The percentage assigned by the compensation committee to each of the participating executive officers is made by reference to his or her level of performance, responsibility and contribution to our profitability. The performance-based bonus earned by the executive officers under the employee bonus policy is based on their respective participation percentage in our operating profits in excess of a specified return on average net assets employed. The specified return targets for the employee bonus policy for 2004 was a twenty percent (20%) return.


RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OUR COMPANY AND MESTEK, INC.

        We were incorporated in 1976 under the name of Tofle America, Inc. as the subsidiary of a Japanese manufacturer of flexible metal hose. For a number of years, we were a manufacturer of flexible metal hose that was sold primarily to customers using the hose for incorporation into finished assemblies for industrial applications. We later changed our name to Omega Flex, Inc., and in 1996, we were acquired by Mestek, Inc.

Historical Relationship with Mestek

        We have been a subsidiary of Mestek since 1996. As a result, in the ordinary course of our business, we have received various services provided by Mestek, including treasury, tax, legal, investor relations, executive oversight and other services. Mestek has also provided us with the services of a number of its executives and employees. Our historical financial statements include allocations by Mestek of a portion of its overhead costs related to these services. These cost allocations have been determined on a basis that we and Mestek consider to be reasonable reflections of the use of these services. Mestek allocated to us $563,000 in 2004 and $348,000 in 2003 of expenses it incurred for providing us these services.

Mestek’s Distribution of Our Stock

        Mestek owns 86% of our common stock until completion of the distribution. In connection with the distribution, Mestek is distributing its entire equity interest in us to its shareholders in a transaction that is intended to be tax-free to Mestek and its U.S. shareholders. The distribution will be subject to a number of conditions, some of which are more fully described below under “—Agreements Between Us and Mestek—Separation and Distribution Agreement.” Mestek may, in its sole discretion, change the terms of the distribution or decide not to complete the distribution before the distribution date.

Agreements Between Us and Mestek

        This section describes the material provisions of agreements between us and Mestek. We encourage you to read the full text of these material agreements. We have entered or will enter into these agreements with Mestek prior to the completion of the distribution in the context of our relationship as a subsidiary of Mestek. The prices and other terms of these agreements may be less favorable to us than those we could have obtained in arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties for similar services or under similar agreements. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Relationship with Mestek.”  

         Separation and Distribution Agreement. The separation and distribution agreement contains the key provisions relating to the distribution by Mestek to its shareholders of our common stock. We expect to enter into this agreement with Mestek on or prior to the distribution date.

        On or prior to the distribution date, Mestek and we will enter into the following ancillary agreements governing various ongoing relationships between Mestek and us following the distribution date:

  o an indemnification and insurance matters agreement;

  o a tax responsibility allocation agreement;

  o a confidential non-disclosure agreement; and

  o a transitional services agreement.

        To the extent that the terms of any of these ancillary agreements conflict with the separation and distribution agreement, the terms of these ancillary agreements will govern. We describe these agreements more fully below.

         Mestek Dividend. At Mestek’s request, we are paying cash dividends aggregating approximately $_______ to Mestek and two management shareholders prior to or concurrently with the completion of the distribution, as part of its plan to maximize the value of Mestek’s investment in our company to Mestek and its shareholders. In determining the amount of the dividends, our board of directors and Mestek considered the level of shareholder equity required in connection with our listing application with NASDAQ and the appropriate capital structure for our company to be able to compete effectively in our industry. The dividends will be provided for in the master separation and distribution agreement. See “Dividend Policy.”

         Intercompany Receivable. Mestek is indebted to us in an amount of approximately $_______, as a result of the prior intercompany financial relationship between our company as a subsidiary and Mestek as the corporate parent. As disclosed elsewhere in the information statement, Mestek will make a partial payment to us prior to the distribution of approximately $_______ against the outstanding balance of the intercompany receivable. After the distribution, the remaining balance of the intercompany receivable will be converted into a formal promissory note payable in three years and bearing interest at the then prevailing three year U.S. Treasury note yield plus 100 basis points.

         The Spin-Off. Under the separation and distribution agreement, we are obligated to:

  o prepare and send to Mestek’s shareholders this information statement and other information concerning us, the spin-off and other matters that Mestek reasonably determines is necessary or required by law before the spin-off becomes effective;

  o prepare and file with the SEC the documentation to effect the spin-off and use our reasonable commercial efforts to obtain all necessary approvals from the SEC;

  o prepare and file with the NASDAQ an application to list the shares that will be distributed in the spin-off and use our reasonable commercial efforts to have those shares listed on the NASDAQ; and

  o take the actions necessary under the securities or blue sky laws of the United States and any comparable laws under any foreign jurisdiction.

        Mestek may, at its sole discretion, change the terms of the spin-off, including the date of the spin-off, or decide not to complete the spin-off. Mestek intends to complete the spin-off subject to the following conditions, any of which Mestek may waive:

  o the Form 10 shall be effective under the Exchange Act, with no stop order in effect with respect thereto, and this information statement shall have been mailed to Mestek’s shareholders;

  o the actions and filings necessary under state securities and blue sky laws of the United States and any comparable laws under any foreign jurisdictions must have been taken and become effective;

  o our common stock shall have been approved for listing on the NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance;

  o the legal opinion Mestek has received from Greenberg Traurig, LLP with respect to the tax treatment of the spin-off has not been revoked or modified by Greenberg Traurig in any material respect and continues to be in effect;

  o the amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws described below under “Description of Capital Stock” must be in effect;

  o each ancillary agreement must be duly executed and delivered and be in full force and effect;

  o we must pay the cash dividends aggregating approximately $_______ to Mestek and two management shareholders prior to or concurrently with the completion of the distribution;

  o all material government approvals necessary to complete the spin-off must be in effect;

  o no legal restraints may exist preventing the spin-off and no other event outside the control of Mestek has occurred or failed to occur that prevents the completion of the spin-off; and

  o nothing shall have happened that makes the spin-off inadvisable in the judgment of Mestek’s board of directors.

         Mestek Consent. We agree that we may not, without the consent of the Mestek board of directors, issue additional shares of our common stock, or enter into a transaction that would constitute a change of more than 50% of the ownershiop of our common stock from such ownership as of the distribution date, or sell or transfer a material portion of our business or assets.

         Information Exchange. We and Mestek will agree to share information with each other for use as long as no law or agreement is violated, it is not commercially detrimental to us or Mestek, and no attorney-client privilege is waived:

  o to satisfy reporting, disclosure, filing and other obligations;

  o in connection with legal proceedings other than claims that we and Mestek have against each other;

  o to comply with obligations under the agreements between Mestek and us; and

  o in connection with the ongoing businesses of Mestek and our company as it relates to the conduct of these businesses before the spin-off.

        Mestek and we will also agree:

  o to use reasonable commercial efforts to retain information that may be beneficial to the other; and

  o to use reasonable commercial efforts to provide the other with employees, personnel, officers or agents for use as witnesses in legal proceedings and any books, records or other documents that may be required by the other party for the legal proceedings.

         Auditing Practices. We will agree:

  o to select the same independent accounting firm as Mestek’s for any accounting periods that include any financial reporting period for which our financial results are consolidated with Mestek’s financial statements;

  o to use reasonable commercial efforts to cause our auditors to date their opinion on our audited annual financial statements on the same date that Mestek’s auditors date their opinion on Mestek’s consolidated financial statements and to enable Mestek to meet its timetable for the printing, filing and the dissemination to the public of any of its annual financial statements that include any financial reporting period for which our financial results are consolidated with Mestek’s financial statements;

  o to provide Mestek with all relevant information that Mestek reasonably requires to enable Mestek to prepare its quarterly and annual financial statements for quarters or years that include any financial reporting period for which our financial results are consolidated with Mestek’s financial statements;

  o to grant Mestek’s internal auditors access to the personnel performing our annual audits and quarterly reviews and the related work papers; and

  o not to change our accounting principles, or restate or revise our financial statements, if doing so would require Mestek to restate or revise its financial statements for periods in which our financial results are included in Mestek’s consolidated financial statements unless we are required to do so to comply in all material respects with generally accepted accounting principles and SEC requirements.

         Expenses. Both we and Mestek will pay our respective out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred with respect to the distribution.

         Termination and Amendment of the Agreement. Mestek may amend the separation and distribution agreement at any time prior to the consummation of the distribution without our approval. Mestek in its sole discretion can terminate the separation and distribution agreement and all ancillary agreements at any time before the consummation of the distribution. Neither we nor Mestek may terminate the separation and distribution agreement at any time after the consummation of the distribution unless the other agrees.

Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement.

         Indemnification.     In general, under the indemnification and insurance matters agreement, we will agree to indemnify Mestek, its affiliates and each of its and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives from all liabilities that arise from:

  o any breach by us of the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement; and

  o any of our liabilities reflected on our consolidated balance sheets included in this information statement;

  o our assets or businesses;

  o the management or conduct of our assets or businesses;

  o the liabilities allocated to or assumed by us under the separation and distribution agreement, the indemnification and insurance matters agreement or any of the other ancillary agreements;

  o various on-going litigation matters in which we are named defendant, including any new claims asserted in connection with those litigations, and any other past or future actions or claims based on similar claims, facts, circumstances or events, whether involving the same parties or similar parties, subject to specific exceptions;

  o claims that are based on any violations or alleged violations of U.S. or foreign securities laws in connection with transactions arising after the distribution relating to our securities and the disclosure of financial and other information and data by us or the disclosure by Mestek as part of the distribution of our financial information or our confidential information; or

  o any actions or claims based on violations or alleged violations of securities or other laws by us or our directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives, or breaches or alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by our board of directors, any committee of our board or any of its members, or any of our officers or employees.

        Mestek will agree to indemnify us and our affiliates and our directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives from all liabilities that arise from:

  o any breach by Mestek of the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement; and

  o any liabilities allocated to or to be retained or assumed by Mestek under the separation and distribution agreement, the indemnification and insurance matters agreement or any other ancillary agreement;

  o incurred by Mestek in connection with the management or conduct of Mestek's businesses; and

  o arising out of various ongoing litigation matters to which we are not a party.

        Mestek will not be obligated to indemnify us against any liability for which we are also obligated to indemnify Mestek. Recoveries by Mestek under insurance policies will reduce the amount of indemnification due from us to Mestek only if the recoveries are under insurance policies Mestek maintains for our benefit. Recoveries by us will in all cases reduce the amount of any indemnification due from Mestek to us.

        Under the indemnification and insurance matters agreement, a party will have the right to control the defense of third-party claims for which it is obligated to provide indemnification, except that Mestek will have the right to control the defense of any third-party claim or series of related third-party claims in which it is named as a party whether or not it is obligated to provide indemnification in connection with the claim and any third-party claim for which Mestek and we may both be obligated to provide indemnification. We may not assume the control of the defense of any claim unless we acknowledge that if the claim is adversely determined, we will indemnify Mestek in respect of all liabilities relating to that claim. The indemnification and insurance matters agreement does not apply to taxes covered by the tax responsibility allocation agreement.

         Insurance Matters. Under the indemnification and insurance matters agreement, we will be responsible for obtaining and maintaining insurance programs for our risk of loss and our insurance arrangements will be separate from Mestek’s insurance programs.

         Disputes. Any disputes under this agreement are subject to non-binding mediation and if not resolved at that stage, then by binding arbitration. Any arbitration will be conducted by an impartial arbitrator selected by us and Mestek.

         Offset. Mestek will be permitted to reduce amounts it owes us under any of our agreements with Mestek, by amounts we may owe to Mestek under those agreements.

         Assignment. We may not assign or transfer any part of the indemnification and insurance agreement without Mestek’s prior written consent. Nothing contained in the agreement restricts the transfer of the agreement by Mestek.

         Tax Responsibility Allocation Agreement. In order to allocate our responsibilities for taxes and certain other tax matters, we and Mestek will enter into a tax responsibility allocation agreement prior to the date of the distribution. Under the terms of the agreement, with respect to consolidated federal income taxes, and consolidated, combined and unitary state income taxes, Mestek will be responsible for, and will indemnify and hold us harmless from, any liability for income taxes with respect to taxable periods or portions of periods ending prior to the date of distribution to the extent these amounts exceed the amounts we have paid or will pay to Mestek prior to the distribution or in connection with the filing of relevant tax returns. Mestek will also be responsible for, and will indemnify and hold us harmless from, any liability for income taxes of Mestek or any member of the Mestek group (other than us) by reason of our being severally liable for those taxes under U.S. Treasury regulations or analogous state or local provisions. Under the terms of the agreement, with respect to consolidated federal income taxes, and consolidated, combined and unitary state income taxes, we will be responsible for, and will indemnify and hold Mestek harmless from, any liability for our income taxes for all taxable periods, whether before or after the distribution date. With respect to separate state income taxes, we will also be responsible for, and will indemnify and hold Mestek harmless from, any liability for income taxes with respect to taxable periods or portions of periods beginning on or after the distribution date. We will also be responsible for, and will indemnify and hold Mestek harmless from, any liability for our non-income taxes and our breach of any obligation or covenant under the terms of the tax responsibility allocation agreement, and in certain other circumstances as provided therein. In addition to the allocation of liability for our taxes, the terms of the agreement also provide for other tax matters, including tax refunds, returns and audits.

         Confidential Non-Disclosure Agreement. The confidential disclosure agreement we will enter into with Mestek provides that both parties will agree not to disclose for five years confidential information of the other party except in specific circumstances in which a party is legally compelled to make disclosure.

         Transitional Services Agreement. The transitional services agreement we will enter into with Mestek will permit us to continue to use certain corporate services previously provided to us by Mestek as a subsidiary corporation in exchange for a management charge. After the distribution the scope of these services will be limited to legal, strategic financial planning and SEC reporting, and tax services by certain Mestek corporate employees. In exchange for these services, we expect to pay approximately $70,000 for certain financial and tax services. In addition, Timothy Scanlan, currently Mestek’s Associate General Counsel and our assistant secretary, will serve as our general counsel for legal matters and we will pay approximately 20% of his salary for such services.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

        Prior to the distribution, eighty-six percent (86%) of all of the outstanding shares of our common stock are owned beneficially and of record by Mestek. The remaining shares are owned beneficially and of record by Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino. To the extent directors and executive officers own or will own Mestek common stock prior to the distribution, they will receive shares of our common stock in the distribution on the same basis as other holders of Mestek common stock. The following table sets forth information with respect to the projected beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock, immediately following the completion of the distribution, by:

  o each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock;

  o each of our directors and our chief executive officer; and

  o all of our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.

        The projections below are based on the number of shares of Mestek common stock beneficially owned by each person or entity at the record date as evidenced by Mestek’s records and a review of statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sections 13(d) or 13(g) and Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The share amounts in the table will not change unless there is a change in the exchange ratio of the distribution. The percentage ownership of our common stock immediately following the distribution will be approximately the same as the percentage ownership of such person or entity immediately prior to the distribution. Percentage ownership is calculated based on 8,600,103 shares of Mestek common stock issued and outstanding on January 1, 2005, and adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as set forth in the table below, upon completion of the distribution, we do not expect any person to own more than five percent of our outstanding common stock.

        Except as otherwise noted in the footnotes below, the entity, individual director or executive officer or their family members or principal shareholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to such securities.


Beneficial Owner Shares of
Common Stock
Owned
Percent of
Class

Directors
 

John E. Reed
3,311,200 (1) 32.62
Stewart B. Reed 2,195,387 (2) 21.63
Kevin R. Hoben 1,015,179  10.00
Mark F. Albino 406,072  4.00
David K. Evans *
Bruce C. Klink *
David W. Hunter 22,830 (3) *
Lawrence J. Cianciolo *
Edward J. Trainor 500  *

Executive Officers
 
Steven A. Treichel 0
E. Lynn Wilkinson 0
Bernard E. Quinlan 0
Total 6,951,168  68.47
          *indicates less than 1% ownership of the issued and outstanding common stock.

(1) Excludes 13,307 share of common stock held by a family trust for which he is not trustee, to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. Excludes 1,712,691 shares of common stock held by John E. Reed as trustee for various family trusts, but for which he disclaims beneficial ownership. Includes 13,307 shares of common stock held by his wife, to which he disclaims beneficial ownership, and 524,994 shares of common stock owned by Sterling Realty Trust, a Massachusetts trust of which John E. Reed is the trustee and of which he and a family trust are the beneficiaries.

(2) Includes 1,325,833 shares of common stock owned by the Stewart B. Reed Trust, of which Stewart B. Reed is the beneficiary and John E. Reed is the trustee.

(3)      Includes 9,500 shares of common stock held by his spouse to which he disclaims beneficial ownership.


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

        The following information reflects our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws as we expect these documents will be in effect at the time of the distribution.

Authorized Capital Stock

        Immediately following the distribution, our authorized capital stock will consist of 20,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Immediately following the distribution, approximately 10,150,000 shares of our common stock will be issued and outstanding, based on the outstanding shares of Mestek as of the record date, excluding Mestek treasury stock. No shares of our preferred stock will be outstanding as of the effective date of the distribution.

Common Stock

        The holders of our common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share on all matters voted on by shareholders, including elections of directors, and, except as otherwise required by law or provided in any resolution adopted by our Board with respect to any series of preferred stock, the holders of such shares will possess all voting power. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of our preferred stock created by our Board from time to time, the holders of common stock will be entitled to such dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board from funds available therefore and upon liquidation will be entitled to receive pro rata the value of all assets available for distribution to such holders.

        The holders of our common stock will have no preemptive rights. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock which we may designate and issue in the future. All outstanding shares of our common stock are, and after the distribution will continue to be, fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred Stock

        Under the amended and restated Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by shareholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The board may issue preferred stock in one or more series and may determine the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the preferred stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, liquidation preferences and sinking fund terms, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and reduce the likelihood that common shareholders will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation. The issuance of preferred stock could also have the effect of decreasing the market price of the common stock and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of our company. We have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

        In addition to the agreement we have entered into with Mestek that for 2 years following the distribution requires us to obtain the consent of the Mestek Board of Directors to any transaction or issuance of our common stock that could result in a change in control of Omega Flex, various provisions contained in our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws could delay or discourage some transactions involving an actual or potential change in control of us or our management. These provisions may limit the ability of shareholders to remove current management or approve transactions that shareholders may deem to be in their best interests and could adversely affect the price of our common stock. These provisions contained in our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws could delay or discourage some transactions involving an actual or potential change in control of us or our management and may limit the ability of shareholders to remove current management or approve transactions that shareholders may deem to be in their best interests and could adversely affect the price of our common stock. These provisions:

  o authorize our board of directors to establish one or more series of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which can be determined by the board of directors at the time of issuance;

  o divide our board of directors into three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. As the classification of the board of directors generally increases the difficulty of replacing a majority of the directors, it may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us and may maintain the composition of the board of directors;

  o prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors. Under cumulative voting, a minority shareholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares may be able to ensure the election of one or more directors;

  o require that any action required or permitted to be taken by our shareholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of shareholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing;

  o state that special meetings of our shareholders may be called only by the Chairman of the board of directors, our Chief Executive Officer or by the board of directors after a resolution is adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors;

  o establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at a meeting;

  o provide that certain provisions of our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation can be amended only by supermajority vote of the outstanding shares, and that our bylaws can be amended only by two-thirds vote of our board of directors;

  o allow our directors, not our shareholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors; and

  o provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors.

Market Price

        There have not been any sales of the Omega Flex common stock (other than by reason of the exercise of options by two officers of Omega, described below) prior to the distribution, and therefore there is no market price for the shares.

Recent Sales

        There have not been any sales of the Omega Flex common stock prior to the distribution. However, in October 2004, Kevin R. Hoben and Mark F. Albino, both of whom are officers and directors of Omega Flex, notified Omega Flex that they had elected to exercise in full the stock options granted to them in 1996 pursuant to the Omega Flex, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino paid for the exercise price of their options as determined in 1996, and received the shares of Omega Flex common stock provided in their respective options. To enable Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino to exercise their respective options in Omega Flex, Mestek lent approximately $900,000 to Mr. Hoben and $360,000 to Mr. Albino on October 8, 2004, with the expectation that these amounts, each evidenced by promissory notes bearing interest at 6.75% per annum, would be re-paid promptly upon the payment of a dividend by Omega Flex shortly thereafter. Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino were not executive officers of Mestek at the time of the loan or at any time prior to such loan. With the proceeds of these loans Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino acquired their respective shares of Omega Flex by exercising their respective options on October 12, 2004, each tendering bank checks to Omega Flex for the purchase price of the shares. On October 13, 2004, Omega Flex issued a dividend in the aggregate amount of $9,000,000, wiring funds due as a result of this dividend to Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino, who immediately on that date repaid Mestek, by personal checks, including 5 days accrued interest, and the promissory notes were cancelled as paid in full.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

        EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. will be the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock.

NASDAQ National Market Listing

        We have applied to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “OFLX.”


INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

        Our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation provide for indemnification of our officers and directors to the extent permitted by Pennsylvania law, which generally permits indemnification for actions taken by officers or directors as our representatives if the officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in the best interest of the corporation. We have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors to specify the terms of our indemnification obligations. In general, these indemnification agreements provide that we will:

  o indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent now permitted under current law and to the extent the law later is amended to increase the scope of permitted indemnification;

  o advance payment of expenses to a director or officer incurred in connection with an indemnifiable claim, subject to repayment if it is later determined that the director or officer was not entitled to be indemnified;

  o reimburse the director or officer for any expenses incurred by the director or officer in seeking to enforce the indemnification agreement; and

  o have the opportunity to participate in the defense of any indemnifiable claims against the director or officer.

        As permitted under Pennsylvania law, the Bylaws contain a provision eliminating the personal liability of directors to us and our shareholders for monetary damages for any action taken, except for breaches of, or failure to perform their fiduciary duties, and such breach or failure constituted self-dealing, willful misconduct or recklessness. The applicable provisions of Pennsylvania law pertain only to breaches of duty by directors as directors and not in any other corporate capacity, including as officers. As a result of the inclusion of these provisions, shareholders may be unable to recover monetary damages against directors for actions taken by them which in violation of their fiduciary duties and are not the result of self-dealing, willful misconduct or recklessness, although it may be possible to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief with respect to such actions. If equitable remedies are found not to be available to shareholders in any particular case, shareholders may not have any effective remedy against the challenged conduct.

        The separation and distribution agreement that we will enter into with Mestek provides for indemnification by us of Mestek and its directors, officers and employees for some liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the distribution, and a mutual indemnification of each other for product liability claims arising from their respective businesses, and also requires that we indemnify Mestek for various liabilities of Omega Flex, and for any tax that may be imposed with respect to the distribution and which result from our actions or omissions in that regard.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

        We intend to furnish the holders of our common stock with annual reports containing financial statements audited by an independent public accounting firm. We also intend to furnish other reports as we may determine or as required by law.

        After the distribution, we will be subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act and will therefore be required to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the date of this information statement will automatically supersede the information in this information statement and any earlier filed incorporated information. You may read these reports, proxy statements and other information and obtain copies of these documents and information as described above.

        No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this information statement, and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized. Neither the delivery of this information statement nor any distribution of securities made hereunder shall imply that there has been no change in the information set forth herein or in our affairs since the date hereof.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        After the stock split discussed in Note 1 to Omega Flex’s consolidated statements is effected, we expect to be in a position to render the following audit report.

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Omega Flex, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Omega Flex, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Omega Flex, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Vitale Caturano & Company, Ltd.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 11, 2005 (except for certain
matters discussed in Note 1 and Note 14 as
to which the date is June 21, 2005.)


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31
2003
 
December 31
2004
 
March 31,
2005
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS
     
Current Assets
    Cash and Cash Equivalents $264  $280  $362 
    Accounts Receivable - less allowances of
      $69, $69, and $114 respectively 5,345  8,780  7,322 
    Inventories 4,901  5,432  6,323 
    Intercompany Receivable from Parent Company 14,059  16,572  6,503 
    Other Current Assets 242   235   214  

    Total Current Assets
24,811  31,299  20,724 

  Property and Equipment - net
6,095  5,697  5,916 
  Goodwill-net 3,526   3,526   3,526  

  Total Assets
$34,432   $40,522   $30,166  

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
   Current Portion of Long-Term Debt $---  $186  $186 
   Accounts Payable 1,152  1,847  1,676 
   Accrued Compensation 1,402  1,936  648 
   Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation (see Note 12) 2,621  3,465  2,384 
   Accrued Commissions 225  346  672 
   Other Accrued Liabilities 3,097   5,060   3,168  

       Total Current Liabilities
8,497  12,840  8,734 

Long-Term Debt
---  3,411  3,364 
Deferred Taxes 81  235  568 
Other Liabilities 222   36   ---  

       Total Liabilities
8,800   16,522   12,666  

Minority Interests
13   4   14  

Shareholders' Equity:
   Common Stock - 8,730,543 shares, 10,151,794 shares and
     10,151,794 shares issued, respectively
     (See Notes 1, 5, 12 and 14) 52  52  52 
   Paid in Capital 9,046  9,046  9,046 
   Retained Earnings 16,176  14,437  7,784 
   Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income 345   461   604  

   Total Shareholders' Equity
25,619   23,996   17,486  

     Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$34,432   $40,522   $30,166  

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended
December 31,
For the
three-months ended
March 31,
2002
(audited)
2003
(audited)
2004
(audited)
2004
(unaudited)
2005
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except earnings per Common Share)

Net Sales
$34,963  $36,996  $48,165  $11,087  $13,251 

Cost of Goods Sold
18,366   18,893   23,397   5,618   6,478  

     Gross Profit
16,597  18,103  24,768  5,469  6,773 

Selling Expense
6,367  6,569  8,709  1,953  2,415 
General and Administrative Expense 3,203  3,554  5,490  1,104  1,685 
Engineering Expense 1,235   1,433   1,363   405   321  

Operating Profit
5,792  6,547  9,206  2,007  2,352 

Interest Income, Net
300  335  371  80  64 
Other Income, Net ---   10   134   1   7  

Income Before Income Taxes
6,092  6,892  9,711  2,088  2,423 

Income Tax Expense
2,529   2,855   3,710   868   1,035  

Net Income
$3,563   $4,037   $6,001   1,220   1,388  

Basic Earnings per Common Share:
     Net Income $0.41  $0.46  $0.66  $0.14  $0.14 

     Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
8,731  8,731  9,042  8,731  10,152 

Diluted Earnings per Common Share:
     Net Income $0.35  $0.40  $0.59  $0.12  $0.14 

     Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
10,152  10,152  10,152  10,152  10,152 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
And
For the quarter ended March 31, 2005
(unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands) Common Shares
Outstanding
(see Notes 1, 5, 12, and 14)
Common
Stock
Paid In
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Gain (Loss)
Total

Balance - December 31, 2001
8,730,543 $52 $9,046 $8,576  ($9) $17,665 

Net Income
3,563  3,563 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment   (1) (1)
    Net Comprehensive                                               3,562 
Balance - December 31, 2002 8,730,543 52 9,046 12,139  (10) 21,227 

Net Income
4,037  4,037 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment   355 355 
    Net Comprehensive                                                                         4,392 
Balance - December 31, 2003 8,730,543 52 9,046 16,176  345 25,619 

Net Income
6,001  6,001 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment   116 116 
    Net Comprehensive Income 6,117 
Common Shares issued (See Note 14) 1,421,251    
Dividends Paid                                           (7,740)               (7,740)
Balance - December 31, 2004 10,151,794 52 9,046 14,437  461 23,996 

Net Income
1,388  1,388 
Cumulative Translation Adjustment   143 143 
     Net Comprehensive Income 1,531 
Dividends Paid                                           (8,041)               (8,041)

Balance - March 31, 2005
10,151,794 $52 $9,046 $7,784  $604 $17,486 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended
December 31,
For the three-months ended
March 31,
2002 2003 2004 2004 2005
(Dollars in thousands)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
         
Net Income $3,563  $4,037  $6,001  $1,220  $1,388 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to
  Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 569  628  665  201  167 
Stock Based Compensation Expense 635  668  844  183  228 
Provision for Losses on Accounts
  Receivable, net of write-offs and recoveries (47) 47  ---  32  45 
Change in Minority Interests 41  (4) (1)
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable (484) (388) (3,435) (1,072) 1,413 
Inventory (192) (304) (531) (15) (891)
Accounts Payable 193  (30) 695  276  (171)
Accrued Compensation 515  (509) 534  (888) (1,288)
Intercompany Receivable from Mestek, Inc. (5,514) (110) (2,513) 492  10,069 
Other Liabilities 981  831  1946  (461) (1,258)
Other Assets (28) (104) 108  42  21 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 232  4,769  4,310  12  9,722 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures (179) (4,939) (267) (47) (386)

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
(179) (4,939) (267) (35) (386)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal Payments Under Long
Term Debt Obligations ---  ---  (123) ---  (47)
Proceeds from Issuance of Long Term Debt ---  ---  3,720  ---  --- 
Proceeds of stock option exercise (see Note 14) ---  ---  1,260  ---  --- 
Dividends paid (see Note 14) ---  ---  (1,260) --  (1,309)
Intercompany Dividends Paid (see Note 14) ---  ---  (7,740) ---  (8,041)

Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities
---  ---  (4,143) ---  (9,397)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
53  (170) (100) (35) (61)

Translation effect on cash
(1) 355  116  138  143 
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period 27  79  264  264  280 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period
$79  $264  $280  $367  $362 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


OMEGA FLEX, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

        The Company is a leading manufacturer of flexible metal hose, which is used in a variety of applications to carry gases and liquids within their particular applications, including carrying liquefied gases in certain processing applications, fuel gases within residential and commercial buildings, vibration absorbers in high vibration applications, and other types of gases and fluids in a number of industrial applications where the customer requires the piping to have both a degree of flexibility and/or an ability to carry corrosive compounds or mixtures, or to carry at both very high and very low (cryogenic) temperatures.

        The Company manufactures flexible metal hose at its facility in Exton, Pennsylvania, and sells its product through distributors, wholesalers and to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) throughout North America, and in certain European markets.

Spin-Off

        On January 19, 2005, Mestek, Inc. (Mestek) and the Company announced that Mestek intended to distribute it’s 86% equity interest in the Company in a spin-off, pro rata, to all of the Mestek’s public shareholders as of a record date June 23, 2005 (the “Spin-Off”). In conjunction with the Spin-Off, the Company proposes to file a Form 10 registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and would expect to be a publicly traded, reporting company following the Spin-Off. The Spin-Off will not require any vote of the Mestek’s shareholders. See Note 14.

Basis of Presentation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Omega Flex, Inc. (Omega) and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”). All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, the financial statements include all material adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Other than its subsidiaries, Exton Ranch, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Omega Flex, Limited, a British corporation, the Company has no equity and debt investments in any other entities.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable valuations, inventory valuations, goodwill valuation, intangible asset valuations, warranty costs, investments, accounting for income taxes and the realization of deferred tax assets. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company’s revenue recognition activities relate almost entirely to the manufacture and sale of flexible metal hose and pipe. Under generally accepted accounting principles, revenues are considered to have been earned when the Company has substantially accomplished what it must do to be entitled to the benefits represented by the revenues. The following criteria represent preconditions to the recognition of revenue:

  o Persuasive evidence of an arrangement for the sale of product or services must exist.

  o Delivery has occurred or services rendered.

  o The sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable.

  o Collection is reasonably assured.

        The Company generally recognizes revenue upon shipment in accordance with the above principles.

Cash Equivalents

        The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include investments in an institutional money market fund, which invests in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds, and/or repurchase agreements, backed by such obligations.

Inventories

        Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories is principally determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, for leasehold improvements, the life of the lease, if shorter. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to income as incurred; significant improvements are capitalized.

Excess of Cost Over Net Assets of Acquired Companies (Goodwill)

        Through December 31, 2001, the Company amortized Goodwill on the straight-line basis over the estimated period to be benefited, typically 25 years. The Company continually evaluated the carrying value of Goodwill in accordance with FAS 121 prior to December 31, 2001. Any impairment was recognized in accordance with the appropriate accounting standards.

        In accordance with FAS 142, the Company ceased recording amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives effective January 1, 2002. In addition, the Company completed the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test based on the amount of goodwill as of the beginning of fiscal year 2002, as required by FAS 142. The Company performed a valuation to determine the fair value of the Company. Based on the results of the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test, the Company determined that no goodwill impairment existed as of January 1, 2002, under FAS 142. The Company performed annual valuation exercises in accordance with FAS 142 as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004 which analyses indicated in both cases no impairment of goodwill.

Advertising Expense

        Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred. Such charges aggregated $378,000, $323,000, and $493,000, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

Research and Development Expense

        Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Such charges aggregated $547,000, $720,000, and $505,000, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively and are included in Engineering expense in the accompanying financial statements.

Treasury Shares

        The Company has not acquired any shares of its common stock.

Earnings per Common Share

        Basic earnings per share have been computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock options of the Company, as more fully described in Note 14, were considered in the computation of diluted earnings per share, except when such effect would be antidilutive. Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding have been adjusted for all periods to give retroactive effect to the stock split which was completed on June 23, 2005, as more fully described in Note 14.

Stock Based Compensation

        The Company has adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (“FAS No. 123”). As permitted by the accounting standard, the Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensations using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for its stock-based compensation plan, except as explained in Note 12.

        The Company made no option grants, modifications of option grants, or settlement of option grants in the three year period ended December 31, 2004 and accordingly, there was no compensation expense impact or pro forma adjustments to Net Income, Basic earnings per share or Diluted earnings per share.

Currency Translation

        Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. The Statement of Operations is translated at average exchange rates. Net foreign currency transactions are reported in the results of operations in U.S. dollars at average exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from the translation of financial statements are excluded from the determination of income and are accumulated in a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Income Taxes

        The Company has elected in 2004 and prior years to file its federal income tax return as part of the Mestek, Inc. parent company, consolidated return. Mestek and the Company account for the Company’s federal tax liabilities on the “separate company basis” method in accordance with FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under this method the Company records tax expense and related deferred taxes and tax benefits in a manner comparable to that which it would record if it were not affiliated with Mestek.

        Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize the benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain.

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

        For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, and the quarter ended March 31, 2005 respectively, the components of Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income consisted solely of foreign currency translation adjustments.


New Accounting Pronouncements

        In January 2003, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns, or both. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a significant variable interest. In December of 2003 FASB issued FIN 46 (R) which, among other things, deferred the consolidation requirements for existing entities until the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The application of FIN 46 did not have any material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In May 2003 FASB issued FAS 150: Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both liabilities and Equity. FAS 150 established standards for how an issuer classifies and measures in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies and obligation of the issuer. FAS 150 was effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 30, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of non-public entities, which were subject to the provisions of FAS 150 for the first fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company does not believe that it has issued any financial instruments subject to the requirements of FAS 150 and accordingly the adoption of FAS 150 by the Company in 2003 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

        In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which codifies, revises and rescinds certain sections of SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition, in order to make this interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The changes noted in SAB 104 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) was issued in December, 2004. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize the compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions with employees in the financial statements. The compensation cost is measured based upon the fair value of the instrument issued. Share-based compensation transactions with employees covered within SFAS 123R include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

        SFAS 123 included a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees, but allowed companies to continue to apply the guidance in APB 25 provided that they disclose in the footnotes to the financial statements the pro forma net income if the fair-value-based method been applied. As explained above, the Company is currently reporting share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with APB 25 and provides the required disclosures.

        SFAS 123R will be effective for the Company for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005.

        All public and non-public entities that used the fair value based method for either recognition or disclosure under SFAS 123 shall apply the modified prospective application transition method. The modified prospective application transition method requires the application of this standard to:

          All new awards issued after the effective date;

          All modifications, repurchased or cancellations of existing awards after the effective date; and

          Unvested awards at the effective date.

        As there are no unvested awards outstanding as of the date of this report, the Company does not presently expect to recognize any compensation cost in the year of adoption of FAS 123R.

2.     INVENTORIES

        Inventories consisted of the following at:

December 31 March 31
2003 2004 2005

Finished Goods
$3,983  $3,856  $4,758 
Raw Materials 918  1,576  1,565 

Total Inventory
$4,901  $5,432  $6,323 

3.     PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

        Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:

2003 2004 Depreciation and
Amortization Est.
Useful Lives
(in thousands)

Land
$    538  $    538   
Buildings 4,112  4,141  15-39 Years
Leasehold Improvements 39  39  3-10 Years
Equipment 5,149  5,387  3-10 Years

Accumulated Depreciation
(3,743) (4,408)
  $6,095 $5,697  

        The above amounts include $238,000 at December 31, 2004 in assets that had not yet been placed in service by the Company. No depreciation was recorded in the related periods for these assets.

        Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations was $569,000, $628,000, and $665,000, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively, and $167,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

4. DEBT

Short-term Debt:

        The Company has cumulatively advanced more to Mestek than it has borrowed resulting in a net Intercompany Receivable from Mestek of $6,503,000at March 31, 2005, $16,572,000 at December 31, 2004 and $14,059,000 at December 31, 2003. The Intercompany Receivable from Mestek includes interest accrued on the average balance outstanding during each quarter at rates which approximate LIBOR plus 1 percent. Interest income related to this accrual was $300,000, $335,000 and $457,000, in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and $64,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.


Long-term Debt:

        Long-term debt consisted of the following at:

March 31 December 31
2003 2004 2005
(in thousands)
Mortgage Note ---  $3,597  $3,550 
Less Current Maturities ---  (186) (186)
  ---  $3,411  $3,364 

        Mortgage Note – On April 16, 2004, the Company’s subsidiary Exton Ranch, Inc. borrowed $ 3,720,000 evidenced by a mortgage note payable to Sovereign Bank. The mortgage note bears interest at LIBOR, plus 1.75% and matures on April 16, 2014. The mortgage note is amortized on a twenty year schedule, but matures ten years after the date of the mortgage note. The monthly payments include a fixed principal payment of $15,500 per month and a variable interest payment based on the above formula. The mortgage note is secured by a first Open End Mortgage and Security Agreement on the property where the Company has its principal manufacturing facilities.

        Maturities of debt in each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows in thousands:

Long-term
Debt
2005 186 
2006 186 
2007 186 
2008 186 
2009 186 
Thereafter 2,667 
Total $3,597 

        The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on the current interest rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. Management believes the carrying value of debt approximates its fair value as of December 31, 2004.

        Cash paid for interest was $0, $0, and $79,000, during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively and $38,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

5.     SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        As of December 31, 2004, the Company had authorized common stock of 1,000 shares with par value of $60 per share, as of December 31, 2004, Mestek, Inc. owned 860 shares of the Company’s common stock, or 86%, and Kevin R. Hoben and Mark F. Albino, the President and Senior Vice President of the Company respectively, collectively owned the remaining 14% of the Company’s common stock. See Note 12. As explained more fully in Note 14, on June 21, 2005, the Company authorized a split of its common shares at a ratio of 10,151.794 to 1 in connection with the planned Spin-Off of Omega Flex common shares to Mestek Stockholders. All references to shares and per share amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively restated to give effect to the stock split at the 10,151.794 to 1 ratio.


6.     INCOME TAXES

        Income tax expense consisted of the following:

2002 2003 2004
(in thousands)
Federal Income Tax:      
                  Current $2,116  $2,270  $3,274 
                  Deferred 190  287  31 
State Income Tax:
                  Current 285  342  449 
                  Deferred 13  (2)
Foreign Income Tax:
                  Current
                  Deferred (75) (50) (42)
         Income Tax Expense $2,529  $2,855  $3,710 

        Income from Continuing Operations before income taxes included foreign losses of ($299,000), ($198,000), and ($168,000), in 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

        Total income tax expense from continuing operations differed from “expected” income tax expense, computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to earnings before income tax, as follows:

2002 2003 2004
(in thousands)
Computed "expected" income tax expense $2,132  $2,412  $3,399 
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit 196  228  292 
Foreign tax rate differential 30  20  17 
Stock option expense - permanent difference 222  234  (11)
Other - net (51) (39) 13 
Income Tax Expense $2,529  $2,855  $3,710 

        A deferred income tax (expense) benefit results from temporary timing differences in the recognition of income and expense for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The components of and changes in the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) which give rise to this deferred income tax (expense) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

December 31,
2003
December 31,
2004
(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets:    
Compensated Absences $   60  $   62 
Inventory Valuation 179  243 
Accounts Receivable Valuation 26 
Fringe Reserves 172  70 
Foreign Tax Operating Loss/Credit Carryforward 207  249 
Other 136  --- 
Total Gross Deferred Tax Assets $780  $632 

Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Prepaid Expenses ($14) ($41)
Depreciation and Amortization (847) (826)
       Deferred Tax Liabilities (861) (867)
       Net Deferred Tax Liability ($81) ($235)

        At December 31, 2004, the Company has a United Kingdom tax operating loss carry-forward of approximately $997,000, which may offset income in future years.

        Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will have sufficient taxable income when these timing differences are reversed and that the deferred tax asset will be realized and accordingly no valuation allowance is deemed necessary.

        Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, principally via intercompany charges from Mestek, Inc., the Company’s parent company, was $2,258,000, $2,860,000, and $3,498,000, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

7. LEASES

        The Company leased its office and manufacturing space in Exton, PA prior to October 7, 2003 when it acquired the premises for $4,650,000. Permanent financing for the transaction was arranged in 2004 as explained more fully in Note 4. A portion of the premises are rented to unrelated third parties. The Company also subleases office space in Westfield, MA from Mestek, Inc. and in High Wycombe, U.K. from Industrious Debenture (Jersey) Limited Partnership and warehouse space in Downingtown, PA on a month-to-month basis from Schorn & Company.

        Rent expense for operating leases was $324,691, $280,000, and $54,258, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

        There are no future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2004.

8.     EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution and 401-K Plans

        The Company maintains (through its parent, Mestek, Inc.) a qualified non-contributory profit-sharing plan covering all eligible employees. Contributions to the plan charged to expense were approximately $128,000 $153,000, and $168,000, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.

        Contributions to the Plan are defined as three percent (3%) of gross wages up to the current Old Age, Survivors, and Disability (OASDI) limit and six percent (6%) of the excess over the OASDI limit, subject to the maximum allowed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, (ERISA). The plan’s vesting terms are twenty percent (20%) vesting after 2 years of service, forty percent (40%) after 3 years, sixty percent (60%) after 4 years, eighty percent (80%) after 5 years, and one hundred percent (100%) vesting after 6 years.

        The Company maintains (through its parent, Mestek, Inc.) a savings & retirement plan qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) for all employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after one year of service. Participants may elect to have up to fifty percent (50%) of their compensation withheld, up to the maximum allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. Participants may also elect to make nondeductible voluntary contributions up to an additional ten percent (10%) of their gross earnings each year within the legal limits. The Company contributes an additional amount equal to 25% of all employee contributions, up to a maximum of 6% of an employee’s gross wages. Contributions are funded on a current basis. Contributions to the Plan charged to expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 were $39,000, $38,000, and $43,000, respectively. The Company Contribution vesting terms are twenty percent (20%) vesting after 2 years of service, forty percent (40%) after 3 years, sixty percent (60%) after 4 years, eighty percent (80%) after 5 years, and one hundred percent (100%) vesting after 6 years.

        As and when the “Omega Flex Spin-off” transaction described in Note 15 is completed, it is expected that the Company will establish separate “profit sharing” and “401K” plans substantially equivalent to those maintained by Mestek on its behalf.

9.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

        The Company is obligated under Indemnity Agreements executed on behalf of 11 of the Company’s Officers and Directors. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company is contingently liable for costs which may be incurred by the Officers and Directors in connection with claims arising by reason of these individuals’ roles as Officers and Directors.

        The Company retains significant obligations under its commercial insurance policies. For losses occurring in the policy years ending October 1, 2004 and October 1,2005, the Company retained liability for the first $2,000,000 per occurrence of commercial general liability claims (including products liability claims), subject to an agreed aggregate. For losses occurring in the policy year ended October 31, 2003, the Company retained liability for the first $500,000 per occurrence of commercial general liability claims (including product liability), subject to an agreed aggregate. In addition, for all the three years the Company retained liability for the first $250,000 per occurrence of workers compensation coverage, subject to an agreed aggregate. The Company maintains reserves for its obligations under these various policies based on claim experience and the reserves established by the insurers in relation to these claims. The reserve balances at December 31, 2003 and 2004 were not material in amount.

        The Company is obligated as a guarantor with respect to the debt of Mestek, Inc. under it primary commercial bank line of credit. In accordance with FIN 45, the Company has evaluated the fair value of the guarantee obligation as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and concluded that the fair value at these dates was not material and accordingly no liability has been recorded on the books of the Company in respect of the guarantee. As and when the “Omega Flex Spin-off” described in more detail in Note 15 is completed, the Company expects that Mestek’s primary commercial banks will agree to terminate the Company’s obligation as guarantor.

        The Company is subject to several legal actions and proceedings in which various monetary claims are asserted. Management, after consultation with its corporate legal department and outside counsel, does not anticipate that any ultimate liability arising out of all such litigation and proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, except as set forth below.

        The Company is engaged in a litigation matter that was filed in the Clark County Circuit Court, in Arkansas, alleging that the Company’s corrugated stainless steel tubing product, TracPipe®, and similar products manufactured by several other manufacturers, also named as defendants in the case, is defective, or that instructions, warnings and training in the installation of corrugated stainless steel tubing are defective, against potential damage to the corrugated stainless steel tubing systems caused by the near-by lightening strikes. The plaintiffs in this case have named three other corrugated stainless steel tubing manufacturers, and one plumber residing in Arkansas, as defendants in this matter, and are seeking class action certification as representatives of all similarly situated persons in the United States, or in the alternative, in Arkansas and Texas, pursuant to the Arkansas rules of civil procedure. The case has only recently been filed, and no determinations have been made as of the date of this information statement whether to certify the class either within the United States, or within the states of Texas and Arkansas. We believe that the plaintiffs’ claims are entirely without merit and are defending the matter vigorously. At this time, there is no ability to estimate the cost of defense or potential damages related to this matter.

Warranty Commitments

        Gas transmission products, such as those made by the Company, carry potentially serious personal injury risks in the event of failures in the field. As a result, the Company has extensive internal testing and other quality control procedures and historically the Company has not had a meaningful failure rate in the field due to the extensive nature of these quality controls. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain a warranty reserve beyond a nominal amount as of March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, or December 31, 2003.

10.     MINORITY INTERESTS

        Five percent of the Company’s Omega Flex Limited subsidiary is held by an unrelated third party.

11.     SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

        The table below sets forth selected quarterly information for each full quarter of 2004, 2003 and 2002.

2004 1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Total Revenues $11,087  $11,040  $11,693  $14,345 
Gross Profit $5,469  $5,576  $5,889  $7,834 

Net Income
$1,220  $1,102  $1,261  $2,418 
Per Common Share:
     Basic $0.14  $0.12  $0.14  $0.26 
     Diluted $0.12  $0.11  $0.12  $0.24 

2003


1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Total Revenues $7,854  $8,105  $9,646  $11,392 
Gross Profit $3,659  $4,008  $4,630  $5,806 

Net Income
$643  $644  $838  $1,912 
Per Common Share:
     Basic $0.07  $0.07  $0.10  $0.22 
     Diluted $0.06  $0.06  $0.08  $0.20 
2002

1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Total Revenues $7,880  $8,314  $8,492  $10,278 
Gross Profit $3,587  $3,794  $4,044  $  5,172 

Net Income
$705  $811  $677  $1,370 
Per Common Share:
     Basic $0.08  $0.09  $0.08  $0.16 
     Diluted $0.07  $0.08  $0.07  $0.13 

12.     STOCK OPTION PLANS

        The Company adopted a stock option plan (Plan), effective July 1, 1996 which provided for the granting of both Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Options (as those terms are defined in the Internal Revenue Code) of up to 200 shares of stock to certain employees of the Company for the purchase of the Company’s common stock at fair market value as of the date of grant. The Plan was approved as of July 1, 1996 by John E. Reed, representing Mestek, Inc. (Mestek) the sole shareholder of the Company, pursuant to authority vested in him by vote of the Board of Directors of Mestek dated May 22, 1996. Options to purchase an aggregate of 140 shares of the common stock of the Company, representing a 14% equity share were granted to two executives, Kevin Hoben, President and Mark Albino, Senior Vice President, effective July 1, 1996. The options vested over a five-year period commencing May 1, 1999 and ending on May 1, 2004. All of the options granted were exercised on October 13, 2004, in connection with which the Company received the $1,260,000 exercise price, as explained more fully below. Through a separate agreement, the option holders (now shareholders in the Company) have a put right after exercise which allows them to sell their shares to the Company at an amount based upon book value and the Company has a corresponding call option at an amount based upon book value. In accordance with APB 25, the Company has reflected pre-tax charges to earnings in 2002, 2003, and 2004 of $635,000, $668,000, and $844,000, respectively, for the compensation value in those periods of the options granted. These charges, which reflect the potential obligations of the Company relative to the put rights, have been credited to Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation which is reflected in the accompanying financial statements in Current Liabilities. The cumulative balance accrued by the Company in the form of stock based compensation expense in respect of the put rights as of December 31, 2004, is $3,465,000. As and when the “Omega Flex Spin-off” described in Note 14 is completed, the Company and Mr. Hoben and Mr. Albino presently expect to mutually terminate their respective call and put rights at which time the Company expects to reclassify the remaining liability to the put rights to Paid In Capital.

        On October 8, 2004, Mestek made a loan to each of the President and Senior Vice President of Omega totaling $1,260,000 on a short-term, fully recourse, fully secured basis pursuant to a contractual obligation created in 1996. The loans were repaid with accrued interest on October 13, 2004. On October 12, 2004, the President and Vice President of Omega exercised the aforementioned options granted in 1996 representing a 14% interest in Omega’s common stock. Omega received $1,260,000 in connection with the exercise which was credited for accounting purposes to Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation in Current Liabilities in accordance with APB 25 and the related authoritative literature addressing accounting for put rights. On October 13, 2004, Omega paid a cash dividend of $1,260,000 to these new shareholders which was charged against Common Stock Subject to Put Obligation for accounting purposes and a proportionate intercompany dividend to Mestek of $7,740,000 which reduced the Company’s Intercompany Receivable from Mestek by this amount.

13.     RELATIONSHIP WITH MESTEK, INC.

        The Company has historically paid fees to Mestek, Inc., its 86% shareholder, for various services including legal, treasury, tax, employee benefits, insurance, executive oversight and corporate office space. The Company’s financial statements include charges for these services of $350,000, $348,000, and $563,000, in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The charges represent estimates of the value of the services provided. The cost to obtain these services subsequent to the planned “spin-off” of the Company’s stock, as more fully described in Note 14, may differ materially from these estimates. See Note 14 for a more comprehensive discussion of the Company’s planned relationship with Mestek subsequent to the planned “spin-off” of Omega Flex stock to Mestek shareholders.

14.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS – OMEGA FLEX SPINOFF/MESTEK “GOING PRIVATE”

        On January 19, 2005, Mestek, Inc. (Mestek) and the Company announced that Mestek intended to distribute it’s 86% equity interest in the Company in a spin-off, pro rata, to all of the Mestek’s public shareholders as of a record date to be established (the “Spin-Off”). In conjunction with the Spin-Off, the Company proposes to file a Form 10 registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and would expect to be a publicly traded, reporting company following the Spin-Off. The Spin-Off will not require any vote of the Mestek’s shareholders.

        In connection with the “spin-off” the Company expects to execute certain agreements governing its relationship with Mestek subsequent to the date of the Spin-off. These include:

  o A Separation and Distribution Agreement which relates to the events surrounding the distribution of Omega common shares to Mestek shareholders and certain aspects of the relationship between the companies thereafter.

  o A Tax Responsibility Allocation Agreement which relates to the allocation of tax liabilities between Mestek and the Company subsequent to the spin-off.

  o An Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement which provides for mutual indemnification relating to the respective company’s liabilities and definitions relating to insurance rights and obligations.

  o A Transitional Services Agreement by which Mestek will continue to provide to the Company certain corporate services, including legal, financial and tax services, in exchange for a fixed annual fee of approximately $70,000.

  o A Confidential Nondisclosure Agreement which imposes certain duties of confidentiality on the Company and Mestek.

        All of the above agreements will be described in greater detail in the Form 10 filing to be made with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company in connection with the planned Spin-off.

        On January 12, 2005, the Company paid a dividend of $9,350,000 to its shareholders of record as of January 1, 2005. Consistent with their shareholdings, 10% of the dividend was received by Kevin Hoben, President and 4% by Mark Albino, Senior Vice President, and 86% was received by Mestek. The Company expects that immediately prior to the spin-off it will pay another dividend to its shareholders further reducing the intercompany receivable from Mestek. It is further expected that the remaining balance will then be converted to a 3 year note receivable from Mestek bearing interest at 100 basis points above the then prevailing 3 year US Treasury note yield.

        The Company, Mestek, Inc., and the above officers entered into a shareholder agreement in 1996 that imposed certain restrictions on the transfer of any shares acquired by such officer in connection with the Omega Flex 1996 Stock Option Plan, and that also provided for rights by the Company to “call,” or the officers to “put,” such shares to or from the other party at a per share price based upon our book value. It is expected that this agreement will be terminated immediately preceding the effective date of the distribution as explained in Note 12.

        On April 19, 2005, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 20,000,000 shares, and on June 21, 2005 authorized a split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 10,151.794 to 1. All references to shares and per share amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively restated to give effect to the stock split at the 10, 1 to 151.794 ratio.

AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

of

OMEGA FLEX, INC.

         FIRST.         The name of the Corporation is Omega Flex, Inc.

         SECOND.         The address of the Corporation’s initial registered office in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is c/o Corporation Service Company, Dauphin County.

         THIRD.         The Corporation is incorporated under the provisions of the Business Corporation Law of 1988 (15 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101 et seq.).

         FOURTH.         (i) The Corporation shall have the power to create and issue a total of 25,000,000 shares, divided into a class of 20,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.01 per share and a class of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock shall be divided into one or more series as the board of directors may determine as hereinafter provided.

        (ii)         The holders of common stock shall have one vote per share. The common stock shall be subject to the prior rights of holders of any series of preferred stock outstanding, according to the preferences, if any, of such series.

        (iii)         The board of directors of the Corporation is authorized to designate the preferred stock into one or more classes or series and the number of shares of any such class or series and to fix the voting rights, designations, powers, preferences limitations and special rights of the preferred stock, or any class or series thereof, including without limitation: the dividend rights and preferences over dividends on the common stock, or any series or classes of the preferred stock; the dividend rate; whether dividends are cumulative; and rights with respect to conversion, voting, redemption, if any; and the redemption price and liquidation preferences of the preferred stock.

        (iv)         Unless otherwise provided in a resolution or resolutions establishing any particular series of preferred stock, the aggregate number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased by an amendment to the articles approved solely by the holders of the common stock and of any preferred stock who are entitled under voting rights designed by the board to vote thereon, if at all, voting together as a class.

         FIFTH.         The purpose or purposes of the Corporation is to engage in the design, manufacture, sale and distribution of flexible metal hose, and all activities ancillary thereto, and to engage in any lawful act or business permitted by the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law, or any successor thereto.

         SIXTH.         Notwithstanding any other provision of law or the articles or the by-laws of the Corporation, and notwithstanding the fact that a lesser percentage may be specified by law, the affirmative vote of not less than sixty-seven (67%) percent of the votes of each class or series of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote shall be required to amend, alter, or repeal any provision of these Articles, or to adopt any provision inconsistent with these articles.

         SEVENTH.         Shareholders of the Corporation shall not be entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

         EIGHTH.         The entire board of directors, or an entire class of the board, may be removed from office only for cause (as hereinafter defined) by the vote of the shareholders, or of the holders of a class or series of shares entitled to elect directors, or the class of directors, except that the entire board of directors may be removed without cause by the unanimous vote or consent of shareholders entitled to vote thereon. If the board or such a class of the board is so removed, new directors may be elected at the same meeting. “Cause” shall mean with respect to each director of the board or each director of any class being so removed, any one of the following: (i) there is a judicial declaration that a director is physically or mentally disabled and cannot perform and discharge his/her duties and offices; (ii) a director is convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of more than one year; (iii) a director breaches or fails to perform the statutory duties of that director’s office and the breach or failure constitutes self-dealing, willful misconduct or recklessness; or (iv) within thirty (30) days after notice of his or her election a director does not accept the office either in writing or by attending a meeting of the board of directors. The amendment or repeal of this provision shall not apply to any incumbent director during the balance of the term for which the director was elected.

         TENTH.         The control transaction provisions contained in sections 2541 to 2548 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

         ELEVENTH.         The business combination provisions contained in sections 2551 to 2556 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

         TWELFTH.         The control share acquisition provisions contained in subchapter G of chapter 25 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

         THIRTEENTH.         The disgorgement provisions contained in subchapter H of chapter 25 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

         FOURTEENTH.         The fiduciary duty provisions of Section 1715 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation. The Corporation shall be governed by Section 1716 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988.