UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
(Mark One)
 
 
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
 
or
 
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from          to          
 
Commission file number: 001-07964
NOBLE ENERGY, INC. LOGO
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
  (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
73-0785597
(State of incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. employer identification number)
100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100
   
Houston, Texas
 
77067
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
(281) 872-3100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $3.33-1/3 par value
 
New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
 
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
   
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes x No
 
Aggregate market value of Common Stock held by nonaffiliates as of June 29, 2007: $10,563,558,607.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 12, 2008: 171,835,490.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 22, 2008, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
1
17
22
22
22
 
22
24
26
27
49
50
102
102
103
104
104
104
104
104
104

 

 

 
PART I
 
Items 1 and 2.      Business and Properties .
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this filing. These statements by their nature are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are influenced by various factors. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. For more information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors—Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements of this Form 10-K.
 
General
 
Noble Energy, Inc. (“Noble Energy”, “we” or “us”) is a Delaware corporation, formed in 1969, that has been publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) since 1980. We are an independent energy company that has been engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and marketing of crude oil and natural gas since 1932. In this report, unless otherwise indicated or where the context otherwise requires, information includes that of Noble Energy and its subsidiaries. Exploration activities include geophysical and geological evaluation and exploratory drilling on properties for which we have exploration rights. We operate throughout major basins in the United States (“US”) including Colorado’s Wattenberg field and Piceance basin, the Mid-continent area of western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, the San Juan basin in New Mexico, the Gulf Coast and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. In addition, we conduct business internationally in China, Ecuador, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, West Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon) and in other areas.  
 
Strategy
 
We are a worldwide producer of crude oil and natural gas. Our strategy is to achieve growth in earnings and cash flow through the development of a high quality portfolio of producing assets that is balanced between US and international projects. Strategic acquisitions (Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (“Patina”) in 2005 and U.S. Exploration Holdings, Inc. (“U.S. Exploration”) in 2006), along with additional capital investment have resulted in substantial growth in the last five years. Acquisitions and capital investment, combined with the sale of non-core assets, have allowed us to achieve a strategic objective of enhancing our US asset portfolio, resulting in a company with assets and capabilities that include growing US basins coupled with a significant portfolio of international properties. Crude oil and natural gas sales volumes have doubled since 2003. Our reserve base, which includes both US and international sources at 58% US and 42% international, has almost doubled in the same period. We are now a larger, more diversified company with greater opportunities for both US and international growth. See Item 6. Selected Financial Data for additional financial and operating information for fiscal years 2003-2007.
 
Proved Reserves
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had estimated proved reserves of 3.3 Tcf of natural gas and 329 MMBbls of crude oil. On a combined basis, these proved reserves were equivalent to 880 MMBoe, an increase of 5% over the prior year. At December 31, 2007, 74% of reserves were proved developed reserves.
 

 

 
Proved reserves estimates at December 31, 2007 were as follows:
 
   
December 31, 2007
 
   
Proved
   
Proved
   
Total
 
   
Developed
   
Undeveloped
   
Proved
 
   
Reserves
   
Reserves
   
Reserves
 
United States
                 
Natural gas (Bcf)
    1,259       581       1,840  
Crude oil (MMBbls)
    129       78       207  
Total US (MMBoe)
    339       175       514  
International
                       
Natural gas (Bcf)
    1,297       170       1,467  
Crude oil (MMBbls)
    100       22       122  
Total International (MMBoe)
    316       50       366  
Worldwide
                       
Natural gas (Bcf)
    2,556       751       3,307  
Crude oil (MMBbls)
    229       100       329  
Total Worldwide (MMBoe)
    655       225       880  
 
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future conditions. For additional information regarding estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves, including estimates of proved and proved developed reserves, the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, and the changes in discounted future net cash flows, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited) and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Reserves.
 
Engineers in our Houston, Denver and London offices prepare all reserve estimates for our different geographical regions. These reserve estimates are reviewed and approved by senior engineering staff and division management with final approval by the Director of Asset Development and certain members of senior management. During each of the years 2007, 2006 and 2005, we retained Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”), independent third-party reserve engineers, to perform reserve audits of proved reserves. A “reserve audit”, as we use the term, is a process involving an independent third-party engineering firm’s visits, collection of any and all required geologic, geophysical, engineering and economic data, and such firm’s complete external preparation of reserve estimates. Our use of the term “reserve audit” is intended only to refer to the collective application of the procedures which NSAI was engaged to perform. The term “reserve audit” may be defined and used differently by other companies.
 
The reserve audit for 2007 included a detailed review of 16 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 71% of US proved reserves and 96% of international proved reserves (81% of total proved reserves). The reserve audit for 2006 included a detailed review of 14 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 80% of our total proved reserves. The reserve audit for 2005 included a detailed review of 11 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 72% of our total proved reserves.
 
In connection with the 2007 reserve audit, NSAI prepared its own estimates of our proved reserves. In order to prepare its estimates of proved reserves, NSAI examined our estimates with respect to reserve quantities, future producing rates, future net revenue, and the present value of such future net revenue. NSAI also examined our estimates with respect to reserve categorization, using the definitions for proved reserves set forth in Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) and subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff interpretations and guidance. In the conduct of the reserve audit, NSAI did not independently verify the accuracy and completeness of information and data furnished by us with respect to ownership interests, oil and gas production, well test data, historical costs of operation and development, product prices, or any agreements relating to current and future operations of the fields and sales of production. However, if in the course of the examination something came to the attention of NSAI which brought into question the validity or sufficiency of any such information or data, NSAI did not rely on such information or data until it had satisfactorily resolved its questions relating thereto or had independently verified such information or data. NSAI determined that our estimates of reserves conform to the guidelines of the SEC, including the criteria of “reasonable certainty,” as it pertains to expectations about the recoverability of reserves in future years, under existing economic and operating conditions, consistent with the definition in Rule 4-10(a)(2) of Regulation S-X. NSAI issued an unqualified audit opinion on our proved reserves at December 31, 2007, based upon its evaluation. Its opinion concluded that our estimates of proved reserves were, in the aggregate, reasonable and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles.
 

 

 
The fields that NSAI audits include our most significant fields and are chosen by senior engineering staff and division management with final approval by the Director of Asset Development and certain members of senior management. We usually include all deepwater Gulf of Mexico fields, all international fields that require reports by requirement of the host government, all fields that require sanctioning by our Board of Directors, and other major fields. No significant fields were excluded from the December 31, 2007 reserve audit.
 
When compared on a field-by-field basis, some of our estimates are greater and some are less than the estimates of NSAI. Given the inherent uncertainties and judgments that go into estimating proved reserves, differences between internal and external estimates are to be expected. On a quantity basis, the NSAI field estimates ranged from 21,966 MBoe above to 16,882 MBoe below as compared with our estimates. On a percentage basis, the NSAI field estimates ranged from 9% above our estimates to 42% below our estimates. Differences between our estimates and those of NSAI are reviewed for accuracy but are not further analyzed unless the aggregate variance is greater than 10%. At December 31, 2007, reserves differences, in the aggregate, were less than 13,200 MBoe, or 2%.
 
Since January 1, 2007, no crude oil or natural gas reserve information has been filed with, or included in any report to any federal authority or agency other than the SEC and the Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) of the US Department of Energy. We file Form 23, including reserve and other information, with the EIA.
 
Acquisition and Divestiture Activities
 
We maintain an ongoing portfolio optimization program. We may engage in acquisitions of additional crude oil or natural gas properties and related assets through either direct acquisitions of the assets or acquisitions of entities owning the assets. We may also divest non-core assets in order to optimize our property portfolio.
 
In December 2007, we entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina for a sales price of $117.5 million, effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008. Crude oil reserves for the Argentina properties totaled 7 MMBbls at December 31, 2007.
 
In 2006, we sold all of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties except for the Main Pass area, which is undergoing redevelopment studies. As of the effective date of the sale, proved reserves for the Gulf of Mexico properties sold totaled approximately 7 MMBbls of crude oil and 110 Bcf of natural gas. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico and Gulf Coast onshore areas remain core areas and are more aligned with our long-term business strategies. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
 
In 2006,   we acquired U.S. Exploration, a privately held corporation, for $412 million plus liabilities assumed. U.S. Exploration’s reserves and production are located in Colorado’s Wattenberg field. This acquisition significantly expanded our operations in one of our core areas. Proved reserves of U.S. Exploration at the time of acquisition were approximately 234 Bcfe, of which 38% of the reserves were proved developed and 55% of the reserves were natural gas. Proved crude oil and natural gas properties were valued at $413 million and unproved properties were valued at $131 million. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
 
In 2005, we acquired Patina through merger ("Patina Merger") for a total purchase price of $4.9 billion. Patina’s long-lived crude oil and natural gas reserves provide a significant inventory of low-risk opportunities that balanced our portfolio. Patina’s proved reserves at the time of acquisition were estimated to be approximately 1.6 Tcfe, of which 72% of the reserves were proved developed and 67% of the reserves were natural gas. Proved crude oil and natural gas properties were valued at $2.6 billion and unproved properties were valued at $1.1 billion. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
 

 

 
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Properties and Activities
 
We search for crude oil and natural gas properties, seek to acquire exploration rights in areas of interest and conduct exploratory activities. These activities include geophysical and geological evaluation and exploratory drilling, where appropriate, on properties for which we have acquired exploration rights. Our properties consist primarily of interests in developed and undeveloped crude oil and natural gas leases. We also own natural gas processing plants and natural gas gathering and other crude oil and natural gas related pipeline systems.
 
United States
 
We have been engaged in crude oil and natural gas exploration, exploitation and development activities throughout onshore US since 1932 and in the Gulf of Mexico since 1968. The Patina Merger and the acquisition of U.S. Exploration have significantly increased the breadth of our onshore operations, especially in the Rocky Mountain and Mid-continent areas. These two acquisitions have provided us with a multi-year inventory of exploitation and development opportunities. In 2007, we continued to expand our acreage position with the acquisition of approximately 290,000 net acres in the Piceance, Niobrara, and New Albany Shale areas. US operations accounted for 58% of our 2007 consolidated sales volumes and 58% of total proved reserves at December 31, 2007. Approximately 60% of the proved reserves are natural gas and 40% are crude oil. Our onshore US portfolio at December 31, 2007 included 1,308,823 gross developed acres and 1,234,858 gross undeveloped acres. We also hold interests in 97 offshore blocks in the Gulf of Mexico . In 2008, we plan to invest approximately $1.2 billion, or 74%, of budgeted capital in the US.

Sales  of production and estimates of proved reserves for our significant US operating areas were as follows:
 
   
 Year Ended December 31, 2007
   
 December 31, 2007
 
   
Sales Volumes
   
Proved Reserves
 
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
   
Total
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
   
Total
 
   
(MMcf)
   
(MBbls)
   
(MBoe)
   
(Bcf)
   
(MMBbls)
   
(MMBoe)
 
Northern Region
                                   
Wattenberg
    59,670       4,674       14,619       893       109       258  
Piceance
    7,797       7       1,307       183       -       31  
Niobrara
    7,897       -       1,316       98       -       16  
Other
    9,392       53       1,618       139       1       24  
Total
    84,756       4,734       18,860       1,313       110       329  
Southern Region
                                               
Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
    18,722       5,847       8,967       79       21       34  
Mid-continent
    30,760       3,340       8,467       341       51       108  
Gulf Coast onshore and other
    16,219       1,530       4,233       107       25       43  
Total
    65,701       10,717       21,667       527       97       185  
Total United States
    150,457       15,451       40,527       1,840       207       514  
 

 

 
Additional information for our significant US operating areas is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended
   
   
December 31, 2007
 
December 31, 2007
   
Gross Wells Drilled/
 
Gross
   
Participated in
 
Productive Wells
Northern Region
         
Wattenberg
   
          508
 
                       5,161
Piceance
   
            55
 
                          112
Niobrara
   
          125
 
                          744
Other
   
            56
 
                       1,239
Total
   
          744
 
                       7,256
Southern Region
         
Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
   
              6
 
                            13
Mid-continent
   
          147
 
                       3,981
Gulf Coast onshore and other
   
            38
 
                          457
Total
   
          191
 
                       4,451
Total United States
   
          935
 
                     11,707
 
Northern Region— The Northern region consists of our operations in the Rocky Mountain area, which includes the D-J (Wattenberg field), San Juan, Wind River, and Piceance basins, as well as the Niobrara, Bowdoin and Siberia Ridge fields. The addition of Patina and U.S. Exploration assets, particularly in the Wattenberg field, combined with our legacy operations in the Bowdoin field, the Niobrara trend, the Wind River basin and Piceance basin, have made the Rocky Mountains one of our core operating areas.  We are currently running 13 drilling rigs and 24 completion/workover units. We plan to invest approximately $744 million, or 62% of budgeted US capital in the Northern region during 2008.
 
Wattenberg Field— The Wattenberg field (approximately 97% operated working interest), our largest US asset, continues to grow production and reserves. In 2007, sales of production from this field accounted for 36% of total US sales volumes. Wattenberg field proved reserves accounted for 50% of US proved reserves at December 31, 2007.
 
We acquired working interests in the Wattenberg field through the Patina Merger in 2005 and acquisition of U.S. Exploration in 2006. Located in the D-J basin of north central Colorado, the Wattenberg field provides us with a substantial future project inventory. One of the most attractive features of the field is the presence of multiple productive formations, which include the Codell, Niobrara and J-Sand formations, as well as the D-Sand, Dakota and the shallower Shannon, Sussex and Parkman formations.
 
Drilling in the Wattenberg field is considered lower risk from the perspective of finding crude oil and natural gas reserves, with 99.8% of the wells drilled in 2007 encountering sufficient quantities of reserves to be completed as economic producers. In May 1998, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (“COGCC”) adopted the “Greater Wattenberg Area Special Well Location Rule 318A” which allows all formations in the Wattenberg field to be drilled, produced and commingled from any or all of ten “potential drilling locations” on a 320-acre parcel. A “commingled” well is one which produces crude oil from two or more formations or zones through a common string of casing and tubing. In December 2005, the COGCC amended Rule 318A providing for an effective well density of one well per 20 acres in a designated portion of the Greater Wattenberg Area to more effectively drain the reservoir. The amendment applies only to the Niobrara, Codell and J-Sand formations and became effective in March 2006.
 
We are currently running seven drilling rigs and 17 completion units in the Wattenberg field. Our current field activities are focused primarily on the development of J-Sand, Codell and Niobrara reserves through drilling new wells or deepening within existing wellbores, recompleting the Codell formation within existing J-Sand wells, refracturing or trifracturing existing Codell wells and refracturing or recompleting the Niobrara formation within existing Codell wells. A refracture consists of the restimulation of a producing formation within an existing wellbore to enhance production and add incremental reserves. A trifracture is effectively a refracture of a refracture. These projects and continued success with our production enhancement program, which includes well workovers, reactivations, and commingling of zones, allow us to increase production and add proved reserves to what is considered a mature field. During 2007, we drilled or participated in 508 development wells, with a 99.8% success rate, and added approximately 244 Bcfe of proved reserves in the Wattenberg field. Approximately 58% of these reserve  additions were natural gas. We also grew production from an average of 227 MMcfe per day for 2006 to 240 MMcfe per day for 2007. We plan to drill approximately 480 wells in 2008 (of which 337 will be combination Codell/Niobrara new drills).  We also plan to participate in 120 non-operated drilling projects in 2008.  We have a substantial project inventory remaining and plan to perform approximately 340 projects including refractures, trifractures, and recompletions during 2008.
 

 

 
Other Rocky Mountain areas include:
 
Niobrara Trend— The Niobrara trend (approximately 87% operated working interest) is located in eastern Colorado and extends into Kansas and Nebraska. During 2007, we expanded our acreage position with the acquisition of 160,000 net acres.  We are currently running two drilling rigs and three completion units.  During 2007, we drilled or participated in 125 wells with a 79% success rate, and our activity resulted in the addition of 19 Bcfe of proved reserves. We plan to drill 300 wells in 2008.
 
Piceance Basin— The Piceance basin in western Colorado (approximately 96% operated working interest) is another rapidly growing area for us. During 2007, we added 10,500 net acres to our position. We are currently running four drilling rigs and three completion units.  We drilled or participated in 55 development wells during 2007, 100% of which were successful, and our activity resulted in the addition of 83 Bcfe of proved reserves. We plan to drill over 100 wells during 2008.
 
Other— We are also active in the Bowdoin field (approximately 60% operated working interest), located in north central Montana; the San Juan basin (approximately 81% operated working interest), located in northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado; and the Wind River basin (approximately 56% operated working interest), located in central Wyoming. During 2007 we drilled or participated in a total of 56 development wells in these areas, 100% of which were successful. We plan to drill approximately 60 wells and recomplete 190 wells during 2008.
 
Southern Region The Southern region includes the Gulf Coast onshore, West and East Texas, Louisiana, and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, as well as the Mid-continent area (the Texas Panhandle and parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, Illinois and Indiana). The Gulf Coast and deepwater Gulf of Mexico are core US operating areas.  During 2006, we sold all of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties except for the Main Pass area. The sale of our shelf properties allows us to migrate future investments and growth from the Gulf of Mexico shelf to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico which we believe is an area of higher potential. We plan to invest approximately $460 million, or 38% of budgeted US capital, in the Southern region during 2008, with approximately 67% in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, and the remainder to the Gulf Coast and the Mid-continent areas.
 
Deepwater Gulf of Mexico— Deepwater Gulf of Mexico accounted for 22% of 2007 US sales volumes and 7% of US proved reserves at December 31, 2007. During 2007, we continued to focus on the growth of our deepwater Gulf of Mexico business highlighted by a successful exploration discovery at Isabela and a successful sidetrack-appraisal well at our 2006 Raton discovery.  We also completed successful development drilling programs in our Ticonderoga and Swordfish fields. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico activity resulted in proved reserve additions of 12 MMBoe during 2007. Participation in the 2007 Central Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf Sale resulted in our being awarded eight new deepwater Gulf of Mexico leases totaling $50 million.
 
At year-end, development planning was underway for Isabela ( Mississippi Canyon Block 562, 33% working interest). We have also acquired an interest in adjacent acreage with additional exploration potential on Mississippi Canyon Blocks 519 and 563 (23.25% working interest).  We plan to drill a well on Block 519 (Santa Cruz Prospect) in 2008 pending rig availability.  In total there are three prospects on the combined leasehold that, conceptually, would be co-developed in a subsea tieback to an existing production facility.
 
Other 2007 exploration drilling included the Mississippi Canyon Block 568 #1 (Robusto Prospect, 20% working interest) and the East Breaks Block 465 #1 (Lost Ark South Prospect, 98.4% working interest), neither of which encountered hydrocarbons in commercial quantities.
 
During 2007 we saw an extremely active deepwater Gulf of Mexico development program. At our Raton project in Mississippi Canyon Block 248 (66.67% operated working interest), we successfully sidetracked and completed the 248 #1 discovery well drilled in 2006.  At year-end the project had moved into the development stage and is slated for subsea tieback and first production in the second quarter of 2008.
 

 

 
At our operated Swordfish project (85% working interest), we drilled and completed a sidetrack to Viosca Knoll Block 917 #1 well and began gas production from this well at year end.   At the Ticonderoga development in Green Canyon Block 768 (50% working interest, non-operated), the #3 and #1 ST4 wells were drilled and completed to extend and enhance production from the field.  Both are slated for first production in the first quarter of 2008.
 
At the Lost Ark project in East Breaks Blocks 421 and 464 (48.4% operated working interest), the 421 #1 well, which had reached the end of its productive life, was plugged and abandoned, and the 464 #1 well was completed and put on production to develop the remaining reserves at the field.
 
We are currently evaluating a possible sidetrack-appraisal well to be drilled at the Raton South oil discovery in Mississippi Canyon Block 292 during late 2008 (originally drilled in 2006). The Redrock natural gas/condensate discovery, also drilled in 2006, is currently considered a co-development candidate to a successful sidetrack-appraisal well at Raton South. Additional key exploration activity planned for 2008 includes a well at the Mississippi Canyon Block 948, Gunflint prospect, (50% working interest), in the second half of 2008.
 
Mid-continent— A significant area of activity in Mid-continent is the Granite Wash development, located in the Texas Panhandle. We drilled or participated in 53 development wells in 2007, 100% of which were successful. The potential for horizontal drilling is currently being evaluated.  Another significant area in Mid-continent is the ongoing Southern Oklahoma development. In 2007 we drilled or participated in 45 wells resulting in additional incremental production of 1,515 Boepd.
 
In addition, we contintue to selectively increase our acreage position in resource plays, including shale plays. We have accumulated over 179,000 acres in the New Albany Shale. During 2007, we drilled 16 New Albany Shale wells. Currently nine are producing and seven are in the progress of pipeline connection. The Paxton facility, which we operate, will serve the majority of wells in the Paxton field. We plan to have an active drilling program during 2008.
 
Other Mid-continent areas include parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, and Arkansas.  During 2007, we drilled or participated in a total of 33 wells. We plan to drill or participate in 60 wells in the Mid-continent area during 2008.
 
Gulf Coast Onshore — During late 2007, we began a six well program at Oliver Creek in Shelby County, Texas to develop the Travis Peak reservoir as well as test deeper Cotton Valley horizons. We have completed one Travis Peak well and are currently completing the second Travis Peak well.  The deeper Cotton Valley horizons are being tested in two additional wells currently being drilled or completed.  Two additional wells remain in the current six well program.  Additional drilling is planned for later in 2008.
 
International
 
International operations are significant to our business, accounting for 42% of consolidated sales volumes in 2007, and 42% of total proved reserves at December 31, 2007. International proved reserves are approximately 67% natural gas and 33% crude oil. Operations in Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Ecuador, China and Suriname are conducted in accordance with the terms of production sharing contracts. In 2008, we plan to invest approximately $392 million, or 24%, of budgeted capital in our international locations.
 

 

 
Additional information for our significant international operating areas is as follows:
 
   
 Year Ended December 31, 2007
   
 December 31, 2007
 
   
Sales Volumes
   
Proved Reserves
 
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
   
Total
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
   
Total
 
   
(MMcf)
   
(MBbls)
   
(MBoe)
   
(Bcf)
   
(MMBbls)
   
(MMBoe)
 
International
                                   
West Africa
    48,349       5,500       13,558       941       82       239  
North Sea
    2,276       4,564       4,943       19       25       28  
Israel
    40,449       -       6,742       319       -       53  
Ecuador
    9,385       -       1,564       188       -       31  
China
    -       1,402       1,402       -       8       8  
Argentina
    -       1,034       1,034       -       7       7  
Total consolidated
    100,459       12,500       29,243       1,467       122       366  
Equity investees:
                                               
Condensate (MBbls)
    -       670       670                          
LPG (MBbls)
    -       2,135       2,135                          
Total
    100,459       15,305       32,048                          
  Equity investee share of   methanol sales (Kgal)
                    160,540                          
 
Wells drilled in 2007 and productive wells at December 31, 2007 in our international operating areas were as follows:
 
   
 Year Ended
       
   
December 31, 2007
   
December 31, 2007
 
   
Gross Wells Drilled/
Participated in
   
Gross
Productive Wells
 
International
           
West Africa
    7       20  
North Sea
    2       22  
Israel
    1       8  
Ecuador
    -       5  
China
    -       16  
Argentina
    50       732  
Total International
    60       803  
 
West Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon) —Operations in West Africa accounted for 46% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 65% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, we held 45,203 gross developed acres and 850,197 gross undeveloped acres in Equatorial Guinea and 1,125,000 gross undeveloped acres in Cameroon.
 
We began investing in West Africa in the early 1990’s. Activities center around our 34% non-operated working interest in the Alba field, offshore Equatorial Guinea, which is one of our most significant assets. Operations include the Alba field and related production and condensate facilities, a methanol plant (located on Bioko Island), and an onshore LPG processing plant where additional condensate is produced. The methanol plant was originally designed to produce commercial grade methanol at a rate of 2,500 MTpd gross. As a result of various upgrade efforts, the plant is now capable of producing up to 3,000 MTpd gross.
 
We sell our share of natural gas production from the Alba field to the LPG plant, the methanol plant and an LNG plant. The LPG plant is owned by Alba Plant LLC (“Alba Plant”) in which we have a 28% interest accounted for by the equity method. The methanol plant is owned by Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC (“AMPCO”) in which we have a 45% interest accounted for by the equity method. The methanol plant purchases natural gas from the Alba field under a contract that runs through 2026. AMPCO subsequently markets the produced methanol to customers in the US and northwestern Europe. We sell our share of condensate produced in the Alba field and from the LPG plant under short-term contracts at market-based prices.
 

 

 
Our exploration activities in West Africa center around Blocks O and I offshore Equatorial Guinea and the PH-77 license offshore the Republic of Cameroon. We are the technical operator on Blocks O and I (45% and 40% working interest, respectively) and the operator on the PH-77 license (50% working interest). We drilled seven wells in the area during 2007 resulting in three new discoveries and three successful appraisal wells:
 
Benita   The I-1 well, testing the Benita prospect, resulted in a new gas-condensate discovery on Block I.
 
Benita appraisal – The I-2 appraisal well on Block I encountered crude oil. Testing has been deferred in order to secure an additional drilling rig that will be capable of further appraisal drilling downdip in the Benita oil column, which is in deeper water. It is expected that a rig will be available for drilling the additional Benita appraisal well in the first quarter of 2008.
 
Yolanda – The I-3 well, testing the Yolanda prospect, resulted in another new gas-condensate discovery on Block I.
 
I-4 – The I-4 well on Block I was a successful well on trend with the 2005 Belinda discovery on Block O.
 
Adriana The O-2 exploration well (the Adriana Southwest prospect) on Block O offshore Equatorial Guinea did not contain commercial hydrocarbons. The well was plugged and abandoned.
 
Belinda appraisal   The O-3 appraisal well on Block O successfully extended the Belinda discovery by establishing significant downdip resources.
 
YoYo – The YoYo-1 well resulted in a new gas-condensate discovery on the PH-77 license offshore the Republic of Cameroon. Additional appraisal work is necessary to verify the areal extent of the discovery. There was also a secondary target, in which commercial hydrocarbons were not found.
 
In 2008, we plan to have an active exploration and appraisal drilling program for both Blocks I and O as we assess our options to commercialize our discoveries in the region.
 
Effective November 2006, the government of Equatorial Guinea enacted a new hydrocarbons law (the “2006 Hydrocarbons Law”) governing petroleum operations in Equatorial Guinea. The governmental agency responsible for the energy industry was given the authority to renegotiate any contract for the purpose of adapting any terms and conditions that are inconsistent with the new law. At this time we are uncertain what economic impact this law will have on our operations in Equatorial Guinea.
 
North Sea —Operations in the North Sea (the Netherlands, Norway and the UK) comprise another core international asset, and we have been conducting business there since 1996. We have working interests in 23 licenses with working interests ranging from 7% to 100%. We are the operator of four blocks, covered by three licenses.  The North Sea accounted for 17% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 8% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007.  At December 31, 2007, we held 48,230 gross developed acres and 836,625 gross undeveloped acres.
 
In January 2007, production began at the non-operated Dumbarton development (30% working interest) in Blocks 15/20a and 15/20b in the UK sector of the North Sea. Dumbarton, a re-development of the Donan field, included subsea tie-back to the GP III, a floating production, storage and offloading vessel in which we own a 30% interest. We expect to continue the development of Dumbarton in 2008 with phases 2a and 2b. In addition, we will participate in the development of the Lochranza prospect, which will also consist of a subsea tie-back to the GP III.
 
Exploration efforts continued in 2007 as we and our partners successfully completed an appraisal well on the Flyndre Block (22.5% working interest) in the UK sector of the North Sea.  We also participated in a successful exploration well at Selkirk in Block 22/22b P233 (30.5% working interest), also in the UK sector of the North Sea.
 
Mediterranean Sea (Israel) —Operations in Israel accounted for 23% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 14% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, we held 123,552 gross developed acres and 1,183,479 gross undeveloped acres located between 10 and 60 miles offshore Israel in water depths ranging from 700 feet to 5,500 feet. Our leasehold position in Israel includes one preliminary permit, two leases and three licenses, and we are the operator.
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have been operating in the Mediterranean Sea, offshore Israel, since 1998, and our 47% working interest in the Mari-B field is one of our core international assets. The Mari-B field is the first offshore natural gas production facility in the State of Israel. During 2007, we completed the Mari-B #7, which is designed to produce twice what a normal Mari-B well produces in Israel, or approximately 200 MMcfpd of natural gas. The Mari-B#7 well has resulted in peak field deliverability of 600 MMcfpd.
 
Natural gas sales began in 2004 and have been increasing steadily as Israel's natural gas infrastructure has developed. In 2007, our gas sales volumes increased 19% over 2006 volumes and 67% over 2005 volumes. During 2007 we completed construction of a permanent onshore receiving terminal in Ashdod for distribution of natural gas from the Mari-B field to purchasers. Commissioning of the terminal is expected in early 2008. We also began selling natural gas to a desalinization plant and a paper mill in 2007. Additional natural gas sales in 2008 will depend on the timing of onshore pipeline construction and plant conversion, which should allow the Israel Electric Corporation Limited power plants at Gezer and Hagit to consume gas.
 
Exploration activities continue in Israel. We are in the process of securing a rig and intend to drill one exploration well testing the Tamar prospect (33% working interest), offshore northern Israel, in 2008.
 
Ecuador —Operations in Ecuador accounted for 5% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 8% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007. The concession covers 12,355 gross developed acres and 851,771 gross undeveloped acres.
 
We have been operating in Ecuador since 1996. We are currently utilizing the natural gas from the Amistad field (offshore Ecuador) to generate electricity through a 100%-owned natural gas-fired power plant, located near the city of Machala. The Machala power plant, which began operating in 2002, is a single cycle generator with a capacity of 130 MW from twin turbines. It is the only natural gas-fired commercial power generator in Ecuador and currently one of the lowest cost producers of thermal power in the country. The Machala power plant connects to the Amistad field via a 40-mile pipeline. During 2007, power generation totaled 911,830 MW hours.
 
Other International —Other international includes China, Argentina and Suriname.
 
We have been engaged in exploration and development activities in China since 1996 and production began in 2003. We are operator of the Cheng Dao Xi field (57% working interest), which is located in the shallow water of the southern Bohai Bay. During 2007, activities consisted primarily of workover projects. China accounted for 5% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 2% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, we held 7,413 gross developed acres and no undeveloped acres.
 
We continue to work with our Chinese partner (Shengli) to obtain governmental approval of the Supplemental Development Plan, designed to further develop the Cheng Dao Xi field through additional drilling and facilities construction.
 
Our producing properties in Argentina are located in southern Argentina in the El Tordillo field (13% working interest), which is characterized by secondary recovery crude oil production. During 2007, we participated in the drilling of 50 gross (6.7 net) development wells. Argentina accounted for 4% of 2007 consolidated international sales volumes and 2% of international proved reserves at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, we held 113,325 gross developed acres and no undeveloped acres in Argentina.
 
In December 2007, we entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina for a sales price of $117.5 million, effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008. Crude oil reserves for the Argentina properties totaled 7 MMBbls at December 31, 2007.
 
Suriname, a country located on the northern coast of South America, represents a new exploration area for us. We have entered into participation agreements on non-operated Block 30 (60% working interest) and on Block 32 (100% working interest), which combined cover approximately 7.7 million gross acres offshore. We expect to participate in the drilling of one well on the West Tapir prospect on Block 30 in 2008.
 

 
 
Sales Volumes, Price and Cost Data Sales volumes, price and cost data are as follows:
 
                           
Average
 
   
Sales Volumes (1)
   
Average Sales Price
   
Production Cost
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
       
   
MMcf
   
MBbls
   
Per Mcf (2)
   
Per Bbl (2)
   
Per BOE (3)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                             
United States
    150,457       15,451     $ 7.51     $ 53.22     $ 8.49  
West Africa (4) (5)
    48,349       5,500       0.29       71.27       2.89  
North Sea
    2,276       4,564       6.54       76.47       9.81  
Israel
    40,449       -       2.79       -       1.14  
Other International (6)
    9,385       2,436       -       53.69       12.06  
Total Consolidated Operations
    250,916       27,951       5.26       60.61       6.99  
Equity Investee (7)
    -       2,805       -       55.09          
Total
    250,916       30,756     $ 5.26     $ 60.10          
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                       
United States
    164,875       16,715     $ 6.61     $ 50.68     $ 8.12  
West Africa (4) (5)
    16,579       6,519       0.37       62.51       2.86  
North Sea
    2,967       1,357       8.00       67.43       10.08  
Israel
    33,906       -       2.72       -       1.60  
Other International (6)
    9,041       2,752       0.96       52.05       9.74  
Total Consolidated Operations
    227,368       27,343       5.55       54.47       6.97  
Equity Investee (7)
    -       2,931       -       45.83          
Total
    227,368       30,274     $ 5.55     $ 53.64          
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                       
United States
    125,543       9,468     $ 7.43     $ 46.67     $ 7.39  
West Africa (4) (5)
    23,938       6,492       0.25       42.51       2.93  
North Sea
    3,394       1,964       5.93       52.68       7.54  
Israel
    24,228       -       2.68       -       2.11  
Other International (6)
    8,389       2,866       1.10       42.37       7.15  
Total Consolidated Operations
    185,492       20,790       5.78       45.35       6.06  
Equity Investee (7)
    -       1,183       -       43.43          
Total
    185,492       21,973     $ 5.78     $ 45.25          
 
 (1)
2007 volumes include the effect of crude oil sales less than volumes produced of 165 MBbls in Equatorial Guinea, 112 MBbls in the North Sea and 48 MBbls in other international. 2006 volumes include the effect of crude oil sales in excess of volumes produced of 195 MBbls in Equatorial Guinea, less than volumes produced of 99 MBbls in the North Sea, and in excess of volumes produced of 18 MBbls in other international. The variance between production from the field and sales volumes is attributable to the timing of liquid hydrocarbon tanker liftings. Sales volumes equal production volumes in 2005.
(2)
Average natural gas sales prices in the US reflect an increase of $1.12 per Mcf (2007), and reductions of $0.25 per Mcf (2006) and $0.77 per Mcf (2005) from hedging activities. Average crude oil sales prices for the US reflect reductions of $13.68 per Bbl (2007), $11.41 per Bbl (2006) and $8.03 per Bbl (2005) from hedging activities. Average crude oil sales prices for West Africa reflect reductions of $2.19 (2007) and $9.93 (2005) from hedging activities. We did not hedge West Africa crude oil sales in 2006.
(3)
Average production costs include oil and gas operating costs, workover and repair expense, production and ad valorem taxes, and transportation expense.
(4)
Natural gas from the Alba field in Equatorial Guinea is under contract for $0.25 per MMBtu to a methanol plant, an LPG plant and an LNG facility. Sales to these plants are based on a BTU equivalent and then converted to a dry gas equivalent volume. The methanol and LPG plants are owned by affiliated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The volumes produced by the LPG plant are included in the crude oil information. For 2007 and 2006, the price on an Mcf basis has been adjusted to reflect the Btu content of gas sales.
 
(5)
Equatorial Guinea natural gas volumes include sales to the LNG facility of 78,090 Mcfpd for 2007.  There were no natural gas sales to the LNG facility before 2007.
(6) 
Other International natural gas volumes include Ecuador and Argentina. Although Ecuador natural gas volumes are included in Other International production, they are excluded from average natural gas sales prices. We own 100% of the natural gas-to-power project in Ecuador and intercompany natural gas sales are eliminated. Natural gas production volumes associated with the gas-to-power project were 9,385 MMcf for 2007, 8,933 MMcf for 2006 and 8,321 MMcf for 2005. Other International oil includes China and Argentina.
(7)
Volumes represent sales of condensate and LPG from the Alba plant in Equatorial Guinea. LPG volumes were 2,135 MBbls in 2007, 2,297 MBbls in 2006 and 850 MBbls in 2005.
 
Revenues from sales of crude oil and natural gas and from gathering, marketing and processing have accounted for 90% or more of consolidated revenues for each of the last three fiscal years.
 
At December 31, 2007, our operated properties accounted for approximately 62% of our total production. Being the operator of a property improves our ability to directly influence production levels and the timing of projects, while also enhancing our control over operating expenses and capital expenditures.
 
Productive Wells The number of productive crude oil and natural gas wells in which we held an interest as of December 31, 2007 is as follows:
 
   
Crude Oil Wells
   
Natural Gas Wells
   
Total
 
   
Gross
   
Net
   
Gross
   
Net
   
Gross
   
Net
 
United States - Onshore
    7,055       5,997.8       4,609       3,134.5       11,664       9,132.3  
United States - Offshore
    28       26.1       15       8.1       43       34.2  
West Africa
    1       0.4       19       7.2       20       7.6  
North Sea
    15       2.7       7       0.7       22       3.4  
Israel
    -       -       8       3.8       8       3.8  
Ecuador
    -       -       5       5.0       5       5.0  
China
    16       9.1       -       -       16       9.1  
Argentina
    732       95.4       -       -       732       95.4  
Total
    7,847       6,131.5       4,663       3,159.3       12,510       9,290.8  
                                                 
Multiple Completions
    8       5.9       14       3.6       22       9.5  
 
Productive wells are producing wells and wells capable of production. A gross well is a well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned. A net well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof. One or more completions in the same borehole are counted as one well in this table.
 



Developed and Undeveloped Acreage Developed and undeveloped acreage (including both leases and concessions) held at December 31, 2007 was as follows:
   
Developed Acreage
   
Undeveloped Acreage
 
   
Gross
   
Net
   
Gross
   
Net
 
United States
                       
Onshore
    1,308,823       835,445       1,234,858       786,391  
Offshore
    147,945       94,964       485,258       227,627  
Total United States
    1,456,768       930,409       1,720,116       1,014,018  
                                 
Equatorial Guinea
    45,203       15,727       850,197       379,026  
Cameroon
    -       -       1,125,000       562,500  
North Sea (1)
    48,230       5,671       836,625       339,151  
Israel
    123,552       58,142       1,183,479       532,818  
China
    7,413       4,225       -       -  
Ecuador
    12,355       12,355       851,771       851,771  
Argentina
    113,325       15,548       -       -  
Suriname
    -       -       7,740,328       6,362,864  
Total International
    350,078       111,668       12,587,400       9,028,130  
Total Worldwide (2)
    1,806,846       1,042,077       14,307,516       10,042,148  
 
 (1)
The North Sea includes acreage in the UK, the Netherlands and Norway. In 2008, we entered into an agreement, subject to regulatory approval, to sell our interest in the Norway acreage consisting of 411,065 gross (126,607 net) undeveloped acres.
(2)
If production is not established, approximately 731,079 gross acres (433,236 net acres) will expire during 2008, 424,734 gross acres (193,554 net acres) will expire during 2009, and 683,274 gross acres (367,949 net acres) will expire during 2010.
 
Developed acreage includes leases that contain wells capable of production. A gross acre is an acre in which a working interest is owned. A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof. Undeveloped acreage is considered to be those leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of crude oil and natural gas regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves.
 


Drilling Activity The results of crude oil and natural gas wells drilled and completed for each of the last three years were as follows:
 
   
Net Exploratory Wells
   
Net Development Wells
 
   
Productive
   
Dry
   
Total
   
Productive (1)
   
Dry
   
Total
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                                   
United States
    14.2       4.5       18.7       757.6       27.6       785.2  
West Africa
    2.6       0.5       3.1       -       -       -  
North Sea
    0.5       -       0.5       -       -       -  
Israel
    -       -       -       0.4       -       0.4  
Argentina
    -       0.1       0.1       6.7       -       6.7  
Total
    17.3       5.1       22.4       764.7       27.6       792.3  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                               
United States
    6.3       9.0       15.3       666.6       5.5       672.1  
West Africa
    -       0.4       0.4       1.8       -       1.8  
North Sea
    -       -       -       1.1       -       1.1  
Argentina
    -       -       -       7.6       -       7.6  
Total
    6.3       9.4       15.7       677.1       5.5       682.6  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                               
United States
    4.7       10.7       15.4       488.1       25.9       514.0  
West Africa
    -       -       -       0.3       -       0.3  
North Sea
    -       0.2       0.2       -       -       -  
Argentina
    -       -       -       7.7       -       7.7  
Total
    4.7       10.9       15.6       496.1       25.9       522.0  
 
(1)
Does not include wells drilled but not yet completed.
 
A productive well is an exploratory or a development well that is not a dry well. A dry well (hole) is an exploratory or a development well found to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.
 
An exploratory well is a well drilled to find and produce crude oil or natural gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of crude oil or natural gas in another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir. A development well, for purposes of the table above and as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC, is a well drilled within the proved area of a crude oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. The number of wells drilled refers to the number of wells completed at any time during the respective year, regardless of when drilling was initiated. Completion refers to the installation of permanent equipment for the production of crude oil or natural gas, or in the case of a dry hole, to the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
 
In addition to the wells drilled and completed during 2007 included in the table above, at December 31, 2007, we were drilling or completing 2 gross (1.0 net) development wells offshore US,  223 gross (192.3 net) development wells and 4 gross (3.3 net) exploratory wells onshore US and one gross (0.1 net) development well in Argentina.
 
Marketing Activities We seek opportunities to enhance the value of our US natural gas production by marketing directly to end-users and aggregating natural gas to be sold to natural gas marketers and pipelines. We also engage in the purchase and sale of third-party crude oil and natural gas production. Such third-party production may be purchased from non-operators who own working interests in our wells or from other producers’ properties in which we own no interest.
 
Natural gas produced in the US is sold predominately under short-term or long-term contracts at market-based prices. In Equatorial Guinea and Israel, we sell natural gas to end-users under long-term contracts at negotiated prices. During 2007, approximately 12% of natural gas sales were made pursuant to long-term contracts.
 
Crude oil and condensate produced in the US and foreign locations is generally sold under short-term contracts at market-based prices adjusted for location and quality. In China, we sell crude oil into the local market under a long term contract at market-based prices. Crude oil and condensate are distributed through pipelines and by trucks or tankers to gatherers, transportation companies and refineries.
 

 

 
Significant Purchaser Marathon Petroleum Supply Company (“Marathon”) was the largest single non-affiliated purchaser of 2007 production and purchased our share of condensate from the Alba field in Equatorial Guinea. Sales to Marathon accounted for 18% of 2007 crude oil sales, or 10% of 2007 total oil and gas sales. No other single non-affiliated purchaser accounted for 10% or more of crude oil and natural gas sales in 2007. We believe that the loss of any one purchaser would not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations since there are numerous potential purchasers of our production.
 
Hedging Activities Commodity prices remained volatile during 2007 and prices for crude oil and natural gas are affected by a variety of factors beyond our control. We have used derivative instruments, and expect to do so in the future, to achieve a more predictable cash flow by reducing our exposure to commodity price fluctuations. For additional information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors— Hedging transactions may limit our potential gains , Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Regulations
 
Government Regulation Exploration for, and production and sale of, crude oil and natural gas are extensively regulated at the international, federal, state and local levels. Crude oil and natural gas development and production activities are subject to various laws and regulations (and orders of regulatory bodies pursuant thereto) governing a wide variety of matters, including, among others, allowable rates of production, prevention of waste and pollution and protection of the environment. Laws affecting the crude oil and natural gas industry are under constant review for amendment or expansion and frequently increase the regulatory burden on companies. Our ability to economically produce and sell crude oil and natural gas is affected by a number of legal and regulatory factors, including federal, state and local laws and regulations in the US and laws and regulations of foreign nations. Many of these governmental bodies have issued rules and regulations that are often difficult and costly to comply with, and that carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. These laws, regulations and orders may restrict the rate of crude oil and natural gas production below the rate that would otherwise exist in the absence of such laws, regulations and orders. The regulatory burden on the crude oil and natural gas industry increases our costs of doing business and consequently affects our profitability.
 
Environmental Matters As a developer, owner and operator of crude oil and natural gas properties, we are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign country laws and regulations relating to the discharge of materials into, and the protection of, the environment. We must take into account the cost of complying with environmental regulations in planning, designing, drilling, operating and abandoning wells. In most instances, the regulatory requirements relate to the handling and disposal of drilling and production waste products, water and air pollution control procedures, and the remediation of petroleum-product contamination. Under state and federal laws, we could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes, including wastes disposed of or released by us or prior owners or operators in accordance with current laws or otherwise, to suspend or cease operations in contaminated areas, or to perform remedial well plugging operations or cleanups to prevent future contamination. The US Environmental Protection Agency and various state agencies have limited the disposal options for hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. The owner and operator of a site, and persons that treated, disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at a site, may be liable, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, for the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. The US Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, third parties are authorized to take actions in response to threats to human health or the environment and to seek to recover from responsible classes of persons the costs of such action. Furthermore, certain wastes generated by our crude oil and natural gas operations that are currently exempt from treatment as hazardous wastes may in the future be designated as hazardous wastes and, therefore, be subject to considerably more rigorous and costly operating and disposal requirements. See Item 1A. Risk Factors— We are subject to various governmental regulations and environmental risks that may cause us to incur substantial costs .
 
Federal and state occupational safety and health laws require us to organize information about hazardous materials used, released or produced in our operations. Certain portions of this information must be provided to employees, state and local governmental authorities and local citizens. We are also subject to the requirements and reporting set forth in federal workplace standards.
 

 

 
Certain state or local laws or regulations and common law may impose liabilities in addition to, or restrictions more stringent than, those described herein.
 
We have made and will continue to make expenditures in our efforts to comply with environmental requirements. We do not believe that we have, to date, expended material amounts in connection with such activities or that compliance with such requirements will have a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Although such requirements do have a substantial impact upon the crude oil and natural gas industry, they do not appear to affect us to any greater or lesser extent than other companies in the industry.
 
Competition
 
The crude oil and natural gas industry is highly competitive. We encounter competition from other crude oil and natural gas companies in all areas of operations, including the acquisition of seismic and lease rights on crude oil and natural gas properties and for the labor and equipment required for exploration and development of those properties. Our competitors include major integrated crude oil and natural gas companies and numerous independent crude oil and natural gas companies, individuals and drilling and income programs. Many of our competitors are large, well established companies. Such companies may be able to pay more for seismic and lease rights on crude oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects and to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. See Item 1A. Risk Factors We face significant competition and many of our competitors have resources in excess of our available resources .
 
Geographical Data
 
We have operations throughout the world and manage our operations by country. Information is grouped into five components that are all primarily in the business of crude oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration, development and production: United States, West Africa, North Sea, Israel, and Other International, Corporate and Marketing. For more information, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 15—Segment Information.
 
Employees
 
Our total number of employees increased during the year from 1,243 at December 31, 2006 to 1,398 at December 31, 2007. The 2007 year-end employee count includes 181 foreign nationals working as employees in Ecuador, China, Israel, the UK, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon and Suriname.
 
Offices
 
Our principal corporate office, including our offices for US and international operations, is located at 100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77067-3610. We maintain additional offices in Ardmore, Oklahoma and Denver, Colorado and in China, Cameroon, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Israel, Suriname and the UK.
 
Title to Properties
 
We believe that our title to the various interests set forth above is satisfactory and consistent with generally accepted industry standards, subject to exceptions that are not so material as to detract substantially from the value of the interests or materially interfere with their use in our operations. Individual properties may be subject to burdens such as royalty, overriding royalty and other outstanding interests customary in the industry. In addition, interests may be subject to obligations or duties under applicable laws or burdens such as production payments, net profits interest, liens incident to operating agreements and for current taxes, development obligations under crude oil and natural gas leases or capital commitments under production sharing contracts or exploration licenses.
 
Available Information
 
Our website address is www.nobleenergyinc.com. Available on this website under “Investor Relations—Investor Relations Menu—SEC Filings,” free of charge, are our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed on behalf of directors and officers and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
 
Also posted on our website, and available in print upon request made by any stockholder to the Investor Relations Department, are charters for our Audit Committee; Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee; Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; and Environment, Health and Safety Committee. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers (the “Codes”) are posted on our website under the “Corporate Governance” section. Within the time period required by the SEC and the NYSE, as applicable, we will post on our website any modifications to the Codes and any waivers applicable to senior officers as defined in the applicable Code, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
In 2007, we submitted the annual certification of our Chief Executive Officer regarding compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards, pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
 
Item 1A.         Risk Factors .
 
Crude oil and natural gas prices are volatile and a substantial reduction in these prices could adversely affect our results and the price of our common stock.
 
Our revenues, operating results and future rate of growth depend highly upon the prices we receive for our crude oil and natural gas production. Historically, the markets for crude oil and natural gas have been volatile and are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. The markets and prices for crude oil and natural gas depend on factors beyond our control. These factors include demand for crude oil and natural gas, which fluctuates with changes in market and economic conditions, and other factors, including:
 
 
·
worldwide and domestic supplies of crude oil and natural gas;
 
·
actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations;
 
·
political conditions and events (including instability or armed conflict) in crude oil producing or natural gas producing regions;
 
·
the level of global crude oil and natural gas inventories;
 
·
the price and level of foreign imports;
 
·
the price and availability of alternative fuels;
 
·
the availability of pipeline capacity and infrastructure;
 
·
the availability of crude oil transportation and refining capacity;
 
·
weather conditions;
 
·
electricity dispatch;
 
·
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; and
 
·
the overall economic environment.

 
Significant declines in crude oil and natural gas prices for an extended period may have the following effects on our business:
 
 
·
limiting our financial condition, liquidity, ability to finance planned capital expenditures and results of operations;
 
·
reducing the amount of crude oil and natural gas that we can produce economically;
 
·
causing us to delay or postpone some of our capital projects;
 
·
reducing our revenues, operating income and cash flow;
 
·
reducing the carrying value of our crude oil and natural gas properties; or
 
·
limiting our access to sources of capital, such as equity and long-term debt.

 
Estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves are not precise.
 
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating crude oil and natural gas reserves and their value, including many factors that are beyond our control. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Our reserve estimates are based on year-end commodity prices; therefore, reserve quantities will change when actual prices increase or decrease. The estimates depend on a number of factors and assumptions that may vary considerably from actual results, including:
 
 
·
historical production from the area compared with production from other areas;
 
·
the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies;
 
·
assumptions concerning future crude oil and natural gas prices;
 
·
future operating costs;
 
·
severance and excise taxes;
·
development costs; and
 
·
workover and remedial costs.

 
 
For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of crude oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties, classifications of those reserves based on risk of recovery and estimates of the future net cash flows expected from them prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers but at different times may vary substantially. Accordingly, reserve estimates may be subject to upward or downward adjustment, and actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to our reserves likely will vary, possibly materially, from estimates.
 
Additionally, because some of our reserve estimates are calculated using volumetric analysis, those estimates are less reliable than the estimates based on a lengthy production history. Volumetric analysis involves estimating the volume of a reservoir based on the net feet of pay of the structure and an estimation of the area covered by the structure. In addition, realization or recognition of proved undeveloped reserves will depend on our development schedule and plans. A change in future development plans for proved undeveloped reserves could cause the discontinuation of the classification of these reserves as proved.
 
Failure to fund continued capital expenditures could adversely affect our properties.
 
Our acquisition, exploration, and development activities require substantial capital expenditures. Historically, we have funded our capital expenditures through a combination of cash flows from operations, our revolving bank credit facility and debt and equity issuances. Future cash flows are subject to a number of variables, such as the level of production from existing wells, prices of crude oil and natural gas, and our success in finding, developing and producing new reserves. If revenue were to decrease as a result of lower crude oil and natural gas prices or decreased production, and our access to capital were limited, we would have a reduced ability to replace our reserves, resulting in a decrease in production over time. If our cash flow from operations is not sufficient to meet our obligations and fund our capital budget, we may not be able to access debt, equity or other methods of financing on an  economic basis to meet these requirements. If we are not able to fund our capital expenditures, interests in some properties might be reduced or forfeited as a result.
 
A recession or an economic slowdown could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
The oil and gas industry is cyclical in nature and tends to reflect general economic conditions. Currently, the US economy is slowing and may be headed toward a recession. A recession may lead to significant fluctuations in demand and pricing for our crude oil and natural gas production. If we were to continue development of our property interests after a decline in the prices of crude oil and natural gas had occurred, our profitability may be significantly affected by decreased demand and lower commodity prices. In addition, our future access to capital could be limited due to tightening credit markets.
 
Our international operations may be adversely affected by economic and political developments.
 
We have significant international crude oil and natural gas operations. These operations may be adversely affected by political and economic developments, including the following:
 
 
·
war, terrorist acts and civil disturbances;
 
·
loss of revenue, property and equipment as a result of actions taken by foreign crude oil and natural gas producing nations, such as expropriation or nationalization of assets and renegotiation, modification or nullification of existing contracts , such as may occur pursuant to the hydrocarbons law enacted in 2006 by the government of Equatorial Guinea ;
 
·
changes in taxation policies;
 
·
laws and policies of the US and foreign jurisdictions affecting foreign investment, taxation, trade and business conduct;
 
·
foreign exchange restrictions;
 
·
international monetary fluctuations and changes in the value of the US dollar; and
 
·
other hazards arising out of foreign governmental sovereignty over areas in which we conduct operations.

Exploration, development and production risks and natural disasters could result in liability exposure or the loss of production and revenues.
 
Our   operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in the drilling, production and transportation of crude oil and natural gas, including:
 
 
·
pipeline ruptures and spills;
 
·
fires;
 
·
explosions, blowouts and cratering;
 
·
formations with abnormal pressures;
 
·
equipment malfunctions;
 
·
hurricanes; and
 
·
other natural disasters.
 
Any of these can result in loss of hydrocarbons, environmental pollution and other damage to our properties or the properties of others.
 

 

 
Exploration and development drilling may not result in commercially productive reserves.
 
We do not always encounter commercially productive reservoirs through our drilling operations. The wells we drill or participate in may not be productive and we may not recover all or any portion of our investment in those wells. The seismic data and other technologies we use do not allow us to know conclusively prior to drilling a well that crude oil or natural gas is present or may be produced economically. The cost of drilling, completing and operating a well is often uncertain, and cost factors can adversely affect the economics of a project. Our efforts will be unprofitable if we drill dry holes or wells that are productive but do not produce enough reserves to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. Further, our drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including:
 
 
·
unexpected drilling conditions;
 
·
title problems;
 
·
pressure or other irregularities in formations;
 
·
equipment failures or accidents;
 
·
adverse weather conditions;
 
·
compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; and
 
·
increases in the cost of, or shortages or delays in the availability of, drilling rigs and equipment.

 
We may be unable to make attractive acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses and/or assets, and any inability to do so may disrupt our business.
 
One aspect of our business strategy calls for acquisitions of businesses and assets that complement or expand our current business. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to identify attractive acquisition opportunities. Even if we do identify attractive opportunities, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to complete the acquisition of them or do so on commercially acceptable terms. Additionally, if we acquire another business, we could have difficulty integrating its operations, systems, management and other personnel and technology with our own. These difficulties could disrupt ongoing business, distract management and employees, increase expenses and adversely affect results of operations. Even if these difficulties could be overcome, we cannot provide assurance that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition would be realized.
 
We are subject to various governmental regulations and environmental risks that may cause us to incur substantial costs.
 
From time to time, in varying degrees, political developments and federal and state laws and regulations affect our operations. In particular, price controls, taxes and other laws relating to the crude oil and natural gas industry, changes in these laws and changes in administrative regulations have affected and in the future could affect crude oil and natural gas production, operations and economics. We cannot predict how agencies or courts will interpret existing laws and regulations or the effect these adoptions and interpretations may have on our business or financial condition.
 
Our business is subject to laws and regulations promulgated by international, federal, state and local authorities relating to the exploration for, and the development, production and marketing of, crude oil and natural gas, as well as safety matters. Legal requirements are frequently changed and subject to interpretation and we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these requirements or their effect on our operations. We may be required to make significant expenditures to comply with governmental laws and regulations.
 
Our operations are subject to complex international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations including in the case of federal laws, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. Environmental laws and regulations change frequently and the implementation of new, or the modification of, existing laws or regulations could negatively impact our operations. The discharge of natural gas, crude oil, or other pollutants into the air, soil or water may give rise to significant liabilities on our part to the government and third parties and may require us to incur substantial costs of remediation.
 
Potential regulations regarding climate change could alter the way we conduct our business.
 
As awareness of climate change issues increases, governments around the world are beginning to address the issue. This may result in new environmental regulations that may unfavorably impact us, our suppliers, and our customers.  The cost of meeting these requirements may have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 


 
The unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and other oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute our exploration and development plans on a timely basis and within our budget.
 
Our industry is cyclical and, from time to time, there is a shortage of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies or qualified personnel. During these periods, the costs of rigs, equipment and supplies are substantially greater and their availability may be limited. As a result of increasing levels of exploration and production in response to strong demand for crude oil and natural gas, the demand for oilfield services and the costs of these services have increased. Additionally, these services may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.
 
We may not have enough insurance to cover all of the risks we face, which could result in significant financial exposure.
 
Exploration for and production of crude oil and natural gas can be hazardous, involving natural disasters and other unfortuitous events such as blowouts, cratering, fire and explosion and loss of well control which can result in damage to or destruction of wells or production facilities, injury to persons, loss of life, or damage to property and the environment. In accordance with industry practices, we maintain insurance against many, but not all, potential perils confronting our operations and in coverage amounts and deductible levels that we believe to be prudent. Consistent with that profile, our insurance program is structured to provide us financial protection from unfavorable loss severity resulting from damages to or the loss of physical assets or loss of human life, liability claims of third parties, and business interruption (loss of production) attributed to certain assets. Although we believe the coverages and amounts of insurance carried are adequate, we may not have sufficient protection against some of the risks we face, because we chose not to insure certain risks, insurance is not available on commercially reasonable terms or actual losses exceed coverage limits. If an event occurs that is not covered by insurance or not fully protected by   insured limits, it could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
We face significant competition and many of our competitors have resources in excess of our available resources.
 
We operate in the highly competitive areas of crude oil and natural gas exploration, exploitation, acquisition and production. We face intense competition from a large number of independent, technology-driven companies as well as both major and other independent crude oil and natural gas companies in a number of areas such as:
 
 
·
seeking to acquire desirable producing properties or new leases for future exploration;
 
·
marketing our crude oil and natural gas production;
 
·
seeking to acquire the equipment and expertise necessary to operate and develop properties; and
 
·
attracting and retaining employees with certain skills.

Many of our competitors have financial and other resources substantially in excess of those available to us. This highly competitive environment could have an adverse impact on our business.
 
Our level of indebtedness may limit our financial flexibility.
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had long-term indebtedness of $1.9 billion (excluding unamortized discount), with $1.2 billion drawn under our bank credit facility. Our indebtedness represented 28% of our total book capitalization at December 31, 2007.
 
Our level of indebtedness affects our operations in several ways, including the following:
 
 
·
a portion of our cash flows from operating activities must be used to service our indebtedness and is not available for other purposes;
 
·
we may be at a competitive disadvantage as compared to similar companies that have less debt;
 
·
the covenants contained in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness and future indebtedness may limit our ability to borrow additional funds, pay dividends and make certain investments and may also affect our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in the economy and in our industry;
 
·
additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate or other purposes may have higher costs and more restrictive covenants;

 

 
 
·
changes in the credit ratings of our debt may negatively affect the cost, terms, conditions and availability of future financing, and lower ratings will increase the interest rate and fees we pay on our revolving credit facility; and
 
·
we may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions.
 
We may incur additional debt in order to fund our acquisition, exploration and development activities. A higher level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. Our ability to meet our debt obligations and reduce our level of indebtedness depends on future performance. General economic conditions, crude oil and natural gas prices and financial, business and other factors will affect our operations and our future performance. Many of these factors are beyond our control and we may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to pay the interest on our debt, and future working capital, borrowings and equity financing may not be available to pay or refinance such debt.
 
Hedging transactions may limit our potential gains.
 
In order to manage our exposure to price risks in the marketing of our crude oil and natural gas, we enter into crude oil and natural gas price hedging arrangements with respect to a portion of our expected production. Our hedges, consisting of a series of contracts, are limited in duration, usually for periods of one to four years. While intended to reduce the effects of volatile crude oil and natural gas prices, such transactions may limit our potential gains if crude oil and natural gas prices rise over the price established by the arrangements. In trying to manage our exposure to price risk, we may end up hedging too much or too little, depending upon how our crude oil or natural gas volumes and our production mix fluctuate in the future. In addition, hedging transactions may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including instances in which our production is less than expected; there is a widening of price basis differentials between delivery points for our production and the delivery point assumed in the hedge arrangement; the counterparties to our future contracts fail to perform under the contracts; or a sudden unexpected event materially impacts crude oil or natural gas prices. We cannot assure that our hedging transactions will reduce the risk or minimize the effect of any decline in crude oil or natural gas prices.
 
Information technology systems implementation issues could disrupt our internal operations, increase our costs and adversely affect our financial results or our ability to report our financial results.
 
We are currently in the process of implementing a new Enterprise Resource Planning software system to replace our various legacy systems. Our implementation is based on a phased approach, the first phase of which was implemented fourth quarter 2007. We expect to implement additional phases during 2008. As a part of this effort, we are transitioning data and changing processes and this may be more expensive, time consuming and resource intensive than planned. Any disruptions that may occur in the implementation or operation of this system or any future systems could increase our expenses and adversely affect our ability to report in an accurate and timely manner our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and to otherwise operate our business.
 
Provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us.
 
Under our Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of our common or preferred stock without approval of our stockholders. Issuance of these shares could make it more difficult to acquire us without the approval of our Board of Directors as more shares would have to be acquired to gain control. In addition, Delaware law imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. These provisions may deter hostile takeover attempts that could result in an acquisition of us that would have been financially beneficial to our stockholders.
 
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
This annual report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. These forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
 
 
·
our growth strategies;
 
·
our ability to successfully and economically explore for and develop crude oil and natural gas resources;
 
·
anticipated trends in our business;
 
·
our future results of operations;
 
·
our liquidity and ability to finance our acquisition, exploration and development activities;
 
·
market conditions in the oil and gas industry;

 

 
 
·
our ability to make and integrate acquisitions; and
 
·
the impact of governmental regulation.
 
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements may be expressed differently. These forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. You should consider carefully the statements under Item 1A. Risk Factors and other sections of this report, which describe factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
 
Item 1B.
 
None.
 
Item 3.
 
We are among a group of eighteen defendants named in a lawsuit filed August 23, 2002 by Dore Energy Corporation under Docket Number 10-16202 in the 38th Judicial District Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  The lawsuit alleges damage to property owned by Dore resulting from oil and gas activities dating to the 1930’s.  Our predecessor, Samedan Oil Corporation, operated on a portion of the property from 1989 to 1999.  Dore has delivered documents alleging approximately $140 million in damages.  Trial is currently set for April 14, 2008. We intend to vigorously defend against these allegations and believe that our share of damages, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
 
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”) issued a notice of violation to Equinox Oil Company on September 25, 2001 alleging violation of air emission and permitting regulations for a facility known as the Zif Gas Plant located near Clay City, Illinois.  On January 17, 2007, the IEPA re-issued written notices of these alleged violations in the name of Equinox’s successors in interest, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Elysium Energy, LLC and Noble Energy Production, Inc. On March 16, 2007, the IEPA accepted our compliance commitment agreement wherein we agreed to pay a delayed permit fee, install an incineration/caustic scrubber emissions control system at the site, and fund a supplemental environmental project (“SEP”) in the nearby community.  At this time, we expect no additional monies to be expended other than these amounts for which we have fully accrued.  As of December 31, 2007, this matter has been concluded.
 
We are involved in various legal proceedings, including the foregoing matters, in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings are subject to the uncertainties inherent in any litigation. We are defending ourselves vigorously in all such matters and we do not believe that the ultimate disposition of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Item 4.
 
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.
 
 
The following table sets forth certain information, as of February 25, 2008, with respect to our executive officers.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
Charles D. Davidson (1)
 
57
 
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
David L. Stover (2)
 
50
 
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Chris Tong (3)
 
51
 
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Alan R. Bullington (4)
 
56
 
Senior Vice President, International
Susan M. Cunningham (5)
 
52
 
Senior Vice President, Exploration
Arnold J. Johnson (6)
 
52
 
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Andrea Lee Robison ( 7)
 
49
 
Vice President, Human Resources
 
(1)
Charles D. Davidson was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of Noble Energy in October 2000 and Chairman of the Board in April 2001. Prior to October 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Vastar Resources, Inc. from March 1997 to September 2000 (Chairman from April 2000) and was a Vastar Director from March 1994 to September 2000. From September 1993 to March 1997, he served as a Senior Vice President of Vastar. From 1972 to October 1993, he held various positions with ARCO.
 
(2)
David L. Stover was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Noble Energy on August 1, 2006. Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice President of North America and Business Development from July 2004 through July 2006. He served as Noble Energy’s Vice President of Business Development from December 2002 through June 2004. Previous to his employment with Noble Energy, he was employed by BP America, Inc. as Vice President, Gulf of Mexico Shelf from September 2000 to August 2002. Prior to joining BP, Mr. Stover was employed by Vastar, as Area Manager for Gulf of Mexico Shelf from April 1999 to September 2000, and prior thereto, as Area Manager for Oklahoma/Arklatex from January 1994 to April 1999. From 1979 to 1994, he held various positions with ARCO.
 
(3)
Chris Tong was elected a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble Energy on January 1, 2005. Prior to January 1, 2005, he had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. since August 1997. Prior thereto, he was Senior Vice President of Finance of Tejas Acadian Holding Company and its subsidiaries including Tejas Gas Corp., Acadian Gas Corporation and Transok, Inc., all of which were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Tejas Gas Corporation. Mr. Tong held these positions since August 1996, and served in other treasury positions with Tejas beginning August 1989. From 1980 to 1989, Mr. Tong served in various energy lending capacities with several commercial banking institutions. Prior to his banking career, Mr. Tong served over a year with Superior Oil Company as a Reservoir Engineering Assistant.
 
(4)
Alan R. Bullington was elected a Vice President of Noble Energy on April 24, 2001 and a Senior Vice President of Noble Energy on July 27, 2004 and is currently responsible for Noble Energy’s International Division. Prior thereto, he served as Vice President and General Manager, International Division of Samedan Oil Corporation beginning January 1, 1998. Prior thereto, he served as Manager-International Operations and Exploration and as Manager-International Operations. Prior to his employment with Samedan in 1990, he held various management positions within the exploration and production division of Texas Eastern Transmission Company.
 
(5)
Susan M. Cunningham was elected a Senior Vice President of Noble Energy in April 2001 and is currently responsible for our world-wide exploration. Prior to joining Noble Energy, Ms. Cunningham was Texaco’s Vice President of worldwide exploration from April 2000 to March 2001. From 1997 through 1999, she was employed by Statoil, beginning in 1997 as Exploration Manager for deepwater Gulf of Mexico, appointed a Vice President in 1998 and responsible, in 1999, for Statoil’s West Africa exploration efforts. She joined Amoco in 1980 as a geologist and held various exploration and development positions until 1997.
 
(6)
Arnold J. Johnson was elected Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Noble Energy on February 1, 2004. Prior thereto, he served as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Noble Energy from January 2001 through January 2004. Previous to his employment with Noble Energy, he served as Senior Counsel for BP America, Inc. from October 2000 to January 2001. Mr. Johnson held several positions as an attorney for Vastar and ARCO from March 1989 through September 2000, most recently as Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Vastar from 1997 through 2000. From 1980 to March 1989, he held various positions with ARCO.
 
(7)
Andrea Lee Robison was elected to the position of Vice President of Noble Energy on November 1, 2007 and is responsible for Human Resources. Prior thereto, she served as Director of Human Resources from May 2002 through October 2007. Prior to joining us, Ms. Robison was Manager of Human Resources for the Gulf of Mexico Shelf for BP America, Inc. from September 2000 through April 2002. Prior to her employment at BP, she served as HR Director at Vastar from 1997 through September 2000, and Compensation Consultant from January 1994 through 1996. From 1980 through 1993 she held various positions with ARCO.
 

 

 
PART II
 
Item 5.
 
Common Stock.   Our common stock, $3.33 1/3 par value, is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NBL.” The declaration and payment of dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and the amount thereof will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
 
Stock Prices and Dividends by Quarters.   The high and low sales price per share of common stock on the NYSE and quarterly dividends paid per share were as follows:
 
               
Dividends
 
   
High
   
Low
   
Per Share
 
2006
                 
First quarter
  $ 46.91     $ 38.32     $ 0.050  
Second quarter
    49.33       36.14       0.075  
Third quarter
    51.71       41.80       0.075  
Fourth quarter
    54.64       41.77       0.075  
2007
                       
First quarter
  $ 60.69     $ 46.33     $ 0.075  
Second quarter
    65.50       58.81       0.120  
Third quarter
    70.55       58.17       0.120  
Fourth quarter
    81.64       69.69       0.120  
 
On January 22, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of 12.0 cents per common share, which was paid February 19, 2008 to shareholders of record on February 4, 2008.
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 161 North Concord Exchange, South St. Paul, MN, 55075.
 
Stockholders’ Profile. Pursuant to the records of the transfer agent, as of February 12, 2008, the number of holders of record of common stock was 817.
 
Stock Repurchases. We did not repurchase any of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2007.
 
Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table summarizes information regarding the number of shares of our common stock that are available for issuance under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007.
 
               
Number of securities
 
               
remaining available
 
         
Weighted-average
 
for future issuance
 
   
Number of securities
 
exercise price of
 
under equity
 
   
to be issued upon
 
outstanding
   
compensation plans
 
   
exercise of
   
options, warrants
 
(excluding securities
 
Plan Category
 
outstanding options
 
and rights
   
reflected in column (a))
 
   
(a)
   
(b)
   
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans  approved by security holders
    6,175,061     $ 32.98       6,713,971  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    -       -       -  
Total
    6,175,061     $ 32.98       6,713,971  
 
 

 

 
Stock Performance Graph. This graph shows our cumulative total shareholder return over the five-year period from December 31, 2002, to December 31, 2007. The graph also shows the cumulative total returns for the same five-year period of the S&P 500 Index, an old peer group of companies and a new peer group of companies. The companies in the old peer group, which has been adjusted for the effects of industry consolidation, consist of Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Apache Corp., Chesapeake Energy Corp., Devon Energy Corp., EOG Resources, Inc., Forest Oil Corp.,  Murphy Oil Corp., Newfield Exploration Company, Pioneer Natural Resources Company,  Stone Energy Corp., and XTO Energy Inc. The companies in the new peer group consist of Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Apache Corp., Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Chesapeake Energy Corp., Devon Energy Corp., EOG Resources, Inc., Forest Oil Corp., Murphy Oil Corp., Newfield Exploration Company, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, Plains Exploration and Production Company, Range Resources Corp., Southwestern Energy Company, and XTO Energy Inc. The changes in peer group were made as a result of industry consolidation and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2002, in our common stock, in the S&P 500 Index and in our old and new peer groups and assumes that all of the dividends were reinvested .
 
 
 
NOBLE ENERGY, INC. GRAPH
      12/02       12/03       12/04       12/05       12/06       12/07  
Noble Energy, Inc.
    100.00       118.88       165.66       217.40       266.26       434.46  
S&P 500
    100.00       128.68       142.69       149.70       173.34       182.87  
New Peer Group
    100.00       129.82       174.50       278.18       276.86       403.91  
Old Peer Group
    100.00       129.53       170.44       267.61       260.17       375.03  

 

 

 
 
Item 6.
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006 (1)
   
2005 (2)
   
2004
   
2003
 
   
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
Revenues and Income
                             
Total revenues
  $ 3,272,030     $ 2,940,082     $ 2,186,723     $ 1,351,051     $ 1,008,226  
Income from continuing operations
    943,870       678,428       645,720       313,850       89,892  
Net income
    943,870       678,428       645,720       328,710       77,992  
Per Share Data
                                       
Basic earnings per share -
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 5.52     $ 3.86     $ 4.20     $ 2.69     $ 0.79  
Net income
    5.52       3.86       4.20       2.82       0.68  
Cash dividends
    0.435       0.275       0.150       0.100       0.085  
Year-end stock price
    80.66       49.07       40.30       30.83       22.22  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    171,078       175,707       153,773       116,550       113,928  
Cash Flows
                                       
Net cash provided by operating activities
    2,016,573       1,730,306       1,239,878       708,186       602,770  
Additions to property, plant and equipment
    1,414,515       1,357,039       785,610       553,643       511,434  
Acquisitions
    -       412,257       1,111,099       -       -  
Financial Position
                                       
Property, plant, and equipment, net
  $ 7,944,464     $ 7,170,757     $ 6,198,916     $ 2,180,715     $ 2,046,909  
Goodwill
    760,496       781,290       862,868       -       -  
Total assets
    10,830,896       9,588,625       8,878,033       3,435,784       2,820,800  
Long-term obligations -
                                       
Long-term debt
    1,851,087       1,800,810       2,030,533       880,256       776,021  
Deferred income taxes
    1,983,833       1,758,452       1,201,191       180,415       161,912  
Asset retirement obligations
    130,956       127,689       278,540       175,415       101,804  
Derivative instruments
    82,803       328,875       757,509       9,678       7,400  
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
    337,667       274,720       279,971       69,479       72,776  
Shareholders' equity
    4,808,807       4,113,817       3,090,144       1,459,988       1,073,573  
Operations Information
                                       
Natural gas sales (Mcfpd)
    687,444       622,927       508,195       366,965       336,611  
Average realized price ($/Mcf) (3)
  $ 5.26     $ 5.55     $ 5.78     $ 4.76     $ 4.19  
Crude oil sales (Bopd)
    76,581       74,915       56,958       44,481       35,101  
Average realized price ($/Bbl) (3)
  $ 60.61     $ 54.47     $ 45.35     $ 34.48     $ 27.67  
Equity investee sales (Bopd)
    7,684       8,032       3,240       894       913  
Average realized price ($/Bbl)
  $ 55.09     $ 45.83     $ 43.43     $ 32.01     $ 25.47  
Proved Reserves
                                       
Natural gas reserves (Bcf)
    3,307       3,231       3,091       1,987       1,642  
Crude oil reserves (MMBbl)
    329       296       291       193       183  
Total reserves (MMBoe)
    880       835       806       525       457  
Number of employees
    1,398       1,243       1,171       559       583  
 
 (1)
Includes effect of acquisition of U.S. Exploration and sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.
(2)
Includes effect of Patina Merger. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.
(3)
Prices include effects of oil and gas hedging activities. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 

 

 
Item 7.
 
We are an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and marketing of crude oil and natural gas domestically and internationally. We operate throughout major basins in the US including Colorado’s Wattenberg field and Piceance basin, the Mid-continent area of western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, the San Juan basin in New Mexico, the Gulf Coast and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. We also conduct business internationally, in China, Ecuador, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, West Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon) and in other areas.
 
Our accompanying consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with the following discussion.
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
 
We are a worldwide producer of crude oil and natural gas. Our strategy is to achieve growth in earnings and cash flow through the development of a high quality portfolio of producing assets that is diversified between US and international projects. The Patina Merger, purchase of U.S. Exploration and sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties have allowed us to achieve a strategic objective of enhancing our US asset portfolio. The result is a company with assets and capabilities that include growing US basins coupled with a significant portfolio of international properties. Our reserve base includes both US and international sources at 58% US and 42% international. We are now a larger, more diversified company with greater opportunities for both US and international growth.
 
2007 was a strong year for us, both financially and operationally. Significant financial results included the following:
 
 
·
net income of $944 million, a 39% increase over 2006 net income;
 
·
diluted earnings per share of $5.45, a 44% increase over 2006;
 
·
cash flow provided by operating activities of $2.0 billion, a 17% increase over 2006; and
 
·
completion of  a $500 million common stock repurchase program begun in 2006.
 
Significant operational highlights included the following:
 
 
·
eight successful exploration wells drilled internationally, six offshore West Africa and two in the North Sea;
 
·
d eepwater Gulf of Mexico exploration success at Isabela (Mississippi Canyon Block 562);
 
·
commencement of production and continued ramp-up at the Dumbarton development and   successful exploratory appraisal well drilled at the Flyndre prospect in the UK sector of the North Sea;
 
·
completion of the Mari-B #7 well and record natural gas sales in Israel;
  · continued success of development program in the US Wattenberg field; and
 
·
acquisition of approximately 290,000 net acres onshore US in the Piceance basin, Niobrara trend and New Albany Shale areas.

Sale of Argentina —In December 2007, we entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina for a sales price of $117.5 million, effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008.
 
Equatorial Guinea 2006 Hydrocarbons Law —Effective November 2006, the government of Equatorial Guinea enacted the 2006 Hydrocarbons Law governing petroleum operations in Equatorial Guinea. The governmental agency responsible for the energy industry was given the authority to renegotiate any contract for the purpose of adapting any terms and conditions that are inconsistent with the new law. At this time we are uncertain what economic impact this law will have on our operations in Equatorial Guinea.
 
2008 OUTLOOK
 
We expect crude oil and natural gas production to increase in 2008 compared to 2007. Factors which may impact our expected year-over-year increase in production include:
 
 
·
higher sales of natural gas from the Alba field in Equatorial Guinea; and
 
·
growing production from the D-J and Piceance basins, where we are continuing active drilling programs;  
offset by:
 
·
natural field decline in the Gulf Coast area.

 

 
Factors which may impact our expected production profile include:
 
 
·
potential hurricane-related volume curtailments in the Gulf of Mexico and Gulf Coast areas;
 
·
potential winter storm-related volume curtailments in the Northern region of our US operations;
 
·
potential pipeline and processing facility capacity constraints in the Rocky Mountain area of our US operations;
 
·
infrastructure development in Israel;
 
·
potential downtime at the methanol, LPG and/or LNG facilities in Equatorial Guinea;
 
·
seasonal variations in rainfall in Ecuador that affect our natural gas-to-power project; and
 
·
timing of capital expenditures, as discussed below, which are expected to result in near-term production.
 
2008 Budget —We have budgeted capital expenditures of approximately  $1.6 billion for 2008. Approximately   24%   of the 2008 capital budget has been allocated to exploration opportunities and 76% has been allocated to production, development and other projects. US spending is budgeted for $1.2 billion, international expenditures are budgeted for   $392 million and corporate expenditures are budgeted for $27   million. The 2008 budget does not include the impact of possible asset purchases. We expect that the 2008 capital budget will be funded primarily from cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We will evaluate the level of capital spending throughout the year based on drilling results, commodity prices, cash flows from operations and property acquisitions and divestitures.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires our management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. When alternatives exist among various accounting methods, the choice of accounting method can have a significant impact on reported amounts. The following is a discussion of the accounting policies, estimates and judgments which management believes are most significant in the application of generally accepted accounting principles used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
 
Purchase Price Allocation —As a result of the Patina Merger in 2005 and the acquisition of U.S. Exploration in 2006, we acquired assets and assumed liabilities in transactions accounted for as purchases. In connection with a purchase business combination, the acquiring company must allocate the cost of the acquisition to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values as of the acquisition date. Deferred taxes must be recorded for any differences between the assigned values and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Any excess of purchase price over amounts assigned to assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. The amount of goodwill recorded in any particular business combination can vary significantly depending upon the value attributed to assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
 
In estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed we made various assumptions. The most significant assumptions related to the estimated fair values assigned to proved and unproved crude oil and natural gas properties. To estimate the fair values of these properties, we prepared estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves. We estimated future prices to apply to the estimated reserve quantities acquired, and estimated future operating and development costs, to arrive at estimates of future net cash flows. For estimated proved reserves, the future net cash flows were discounted using a market-based weighted average cost of capital rate determined appropriate at the time of the merger. The market-based weighted average cost of capital rate was subjected to additional project-specific risking factors. To compensate for the inherent risk of estimating and valuing unproved reserves, the discounted future net cash flows of probable and possible reserves were reduced by additional risk-weighting factors.
 
Estimated deferred taxes were based on available information concerning the tax basis of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and loss carryforwards at the merger date, although such estimates may change in the future as additional information becomes known.
 
While the estimates of fair value for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have no effect on our cash flows, they can have an effect on the future results of operations. Generally, higher fair values assigned to crude oil and natural gas properties result in higher future depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A") expense, which results in  decreased future net earnings. Also, a higher fair value assigned to crude oil and natural gas properties, based on higher estimates of future crude oil and natural gas prices, could increase the likelihood of impairment in the event of lower commodity prices or higher operating or development costs than those originally used to determine fair value. Impairment would have no effect on cash flows but would result in a decrease in net income for the period in which the impairment is recorded.
 

 

 
Goodwill —As of December 31, 2007, the consolidated balance sheet included $760 million of goodwill, all of which has been assigned to the US reporting unit. Goodwill is not amortized to earnings but is tested, at least annually, for impairment at the reporting unit level. We conduct the goodwill impairment test as of December 31 of each year. Other events and changes in circumstances may also require goodwill to be tested for impairment between annual measurement dates. If the carrying value of goodwill is determined to be impaired, the amount of goodwill is reduced and a corresponding charge is made to earnings in the period in which the goodwill is determined to be impaired.
 
The impairment assessment requires management to make estimates regarding the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill has been assigned. The fair value of the US reporting unit was determined using a combination of the income approach and the market approach. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit is estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows. Under the market approach, the fair value is estimated based on selected financial metrics.
 
The income approach is dependent on a number of factors including estimates of forecasted revenue and operating costs, proved reserves, as well as the success of future exploration for and development of unproved reserves, appropriate discount rates and other variables. Downward revisions of estimated reserve quantities, increases in future cost estimates, divestiture of a significant component of the reporting unit, or sustained decreases in natural gas or crude oil prices could lead to an impairment of all or a portion of goodwill in future periods. Under the market approach, we make certain judgments about the selection of comparable companies, comparable recent company and asset transactions and transaction premiums. Although we have based the fair value estimate on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, those assumptions are inherently unpredictable and uncertain and actual results could differ from the estimate. In 2007, no goodwill impairment was recognized.
 
When we dispose of a reporting unit or a portion of a reporting unit that constitutes a business, we include goodwill associated with that business in the carrying amount of the business in order to determine the gain or loss on disposal. The amount of goodwill to be included in that carrying amount is based on the relative fair value of the business to be disposed of and the portion of the reporting unit that will be retained. During 2006, we allocated $100 million of US reporting unit goodwill to the carrying amount of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties sold. The amount of goodwill allocated to the carrying amount of a business can significantly impact the amount of gain or loss recognized on the sale of that business.
 
Reserves —All of the reserve data in this Form 10-K are estimates. Estimates of our crude oil and natural gas reserves are prepared by our engineers in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Uncertainties include the projection of future production rates and the expected timing of development expenditures. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, reserve estimates may be different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. Estimates of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves significantly affect our DD&A expense. For example, if estimates of proved reserves decline, the DD&A rate will increase, resulting in a decrease in net income. A decline in estimates of proved reserves could also trigger an impairment analysis to determine if the carrying amount of crude oil and natural gas properties exceeds fair value and could result in an impairment charge, which would reduce earnings. In addition, a decline in estimates of proved reserves could trigger a goodwill impairment analysis.
 
Oil and Gas Properties —We account for crude oil and natural gas properties under the successful efforts method of accounting. The alternative method of accounting for crude oil and natural gas properties is the full cost method. Under the successful efforts method, costs to acquire mineral interests in crude oil and natural gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves and to drill and equip development wells are capitalized. Proved property acquisition costs are amortized to operations by the unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis based on total proved crude oil and natural gas reserves as estimated by our engineers. Costs to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves and to drill and equip development wells are also amortized to operations by the unit-of-production method on a property-by-property basis. They are amortized based on proved developed crude oil and natural gas reserves. Application of the successful efforts method results in the expensing of certain costs including geological and geophysical costs, exploratory dry holes and delay rentals, during the periods the costs are incurred. Under the full cost method, these costs are capitalized as assets and charged to earnings in future periods as a component of DD&A expense. In addition, under the full cost method capitalized costs are accumulated in pools on a country-by-country basis. DD&A is computed on a country-by-country basis, and capitalized costs are limited on the same basis through the application of a ceiling test. We believe the successful efforts method is the most appropriate method to use in accounting for our crude oil and natural gas properties as this method is better aligned with our business strategy. If we had used the full cost method, our financial position and results of operations could have been significantly different.
 

 

 
Exploratory Well Costs —In accordance with the successful efforts method of accounting, the costs associated with drilling an exploratory well may be capitalized temporarily, or “suspended,” pending a determination of whether commercial quantities of crude oil or natural gas have been discovered. We will carry the costs of an exploratory well as an asset if the well found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and as long as we are making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. For certain capital-intensive deepwater Gulf of Mexico or international projects, it may take more than one year to evaluate the future potential of the exploration well and make a determination of its economic viability. Our ability to move forward on a project may be dependent on gaining access to transportation or processing facilities or obtaining permits and government or partner approval, the timing of which is beyond our control. In such cases, exploratory well costs remain suspended as long as we are actively pursuing access to necessary facilities and access to such permits and approvals and believe they will be obtained. Management assesses the status of suspended exploratory well costs on a quarterly basis. These costs may be charged to exploration expense in future periods if we decide not to pursue additional exploratory or development activities. At December 31, 2007, the balance of property, plant and equipment included $249 million of suspended exploratory well costs, $62 million of which had been capitalized for a period greater than one year. The wells relating to these suspended costs continue to be evaluated by various means including additional seismic work, drilling additional wells, or evaluating the potential of the exploration wells. For more information, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5—Capitalized Exploratory Well Costs.
 
Impairment of Proved Oil and Gas Properties —We assess proved crude oil and natural gas properties for possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the recorded carrying value of the properties may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss as a result of a triggering event and when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property are less than the carrying value. If impairment is indicated, the cash flows are discounted at a rate approximate to our cost of capital and compared to the carrying value for determining the amount of the impairment loss to record. Estimated future cash flows are based on management’s expectations for the future and include estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves and future commodity prices and operating costs. Downward revisions in estimates of reserve quantities or expectations of falling commodity prices or rising operating costs could result in a reduction in undiscounted future cash flows and could indicate property impairment. We recorded approximately $4 million of impairments in 2007, primarily related to adjustment of the carrying value of properties to their fair values.
 
Impairment of Unproved Oil and Gas Properties —We also perform periodic assessments of individually significant unproved crude oil and natural gas properties for impairment. Cash flows used in the impairment analysis are determined based upon management’s estimates of natural gas and crude oil reserves, future commodity prices and future costs to extract the reserves. Downward revisions in estimated reserve quantities, reductions in commodity prices, or increases in estimated costs could cause a reduction in the value of an unproved property and, therefore, could also cause a reduction in the carrying amounts of the property. If undiscounted future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, indicating impairment, the cash flows are discounted at a rate approximate to our cost of capital and compared to the carrying value for determining the amount of the impairment loss to record. The estimated prices used in the cash flow analysis are determined by management based on forward price curves for the related commodities, adjusted for average historical location and quality differentials. Estimates of cash flows related to probable and possible reserves are reduced by additional risk-weighting factors. Due to the volatility of natural gas and crude oil prices, these cash flow estimates are inherently imprecise. Management’s assessment of the results of exploration activities, availability of funds for future activities and the current and projected political climate in areas in which we operate also impact the amounts and timing of impairment provisions. During 2007, we recorded impairments of significant unproved oil and gas properties totaling approximately $3 million in exploration expense.
 
Asset Retirement Obligation —Our asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) consist of estimated costs of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation and similar activities associated with our oil and gas properties. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” requires that the discounted fair value of a liability for an ARO be recognized in the period in which it is incurred with the associated asset retirement cost capitalized as part of the carrying cost of the oil and gas asset. The recognition of an ARO requires that management make numerous estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an ARO; estimated probabilities, amounts and timing of settlements; the credit-adjusted risk-free rate to be used; and inflation rates. In periods subsequent to initial measurement of the ARO, we must recognize period-to-period changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows. Increases in the ARO liability due to passage of time impact net income as accretion expense. The related capitalized cost, including revisions thereto, is charged to expense through DD&A. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 6—Asset Retirement Obligations.

 
 
Involuntary Conversions —When an involuntary conversion occurs, such as the destruction of oil and gas producing assets by a hurricane, a loss is accrued by a charge to income if the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. An asset relating to insurance recovery is recognized only when realization of the claim for recovery of a loss recognized in the financial statements is deemed probable. A gain (recovery of a loss not yet recognized in the financial statements or an amount recovered in excess of a loss recognized in the financial statements) is not recognized until the insurance reimbursement has been received.
 
Management must make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to these gain and loss accruals. These include estimated costs of salvage, clean-up, restoration, redevelopment or abandonment and estimated amounts of insurance recoveries. The amount of an insurance recovery may be limited if total industry claims are in excess of the insurance carrier’s ceiling limitation per event. A significant amount of time may be necessary for an insurance carrier to review all related claims for an event and determine the company-specific claim limitation on the final recovery. In addition, we may continue to incur costs, submit claims and receive reimbursements over a multi-year period.
 
The estimates involved in this process can have significant effects on reported amounts of net income. A decrease in the estimated amount of insurance recoveries will result in an increase in the involuntary conversion loss, which will result in a decrease in net income. An increase in estimated costs of salvage, if not covered by insurance, will also result in an increase in the involuntary conversion loss, which will result in a decrease in net income. Unreimbursed losses will have a negative effect on our cash flows. During the first half of 2007, several factors contributed to an increase in our estimated cleanup costs for damage related to Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina.  These factors included cost escalation due to weather delays and an increase in effort for the design and construction of the deck lifting barge and mooring system, as well as additional costs for the actual deck lifting activities.  These increases caused the total project costs, combined with net book value of the assets destroyed, to exceed certain insurance coverage limitations.  As a result, we recorded $51 million as a loss on involuntary conversion during 2007.   See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 4—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
 
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities —We use various derivative instruments to minimize the impact of commodity price fluctuations on forecasted sales of crude oil and natural gas production. We also use derivative instruments in connection with purchases and sales of third-party production to lock in profits or limit exposure to commodity price risk. In addition, we have used derivative instruments in connection with acquisitions and certain price-sensitive projects. Management exercises significant judgment in determining types of instruments to be used, production volumes to be hedged, prices at which to hedge and the counterparties’ creditworthiness. We account for derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended”. For derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value, to the extent the hedge is effective, are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCL”) until the hedged forecasted transaction is recognized in earnings. Therefore, prior to settlement of the derivative instruments, changes in the fair market value of those derivative instruments can cause significant increases or decreases in AOCL. For derivative instruments that do not qualify as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are reported in current period net income and therefore can result in significant increases or decreases in current period net income. All hedge ineffectiveness is recognized in the current period in net income. Ineffectiveness is the amount of gains or losses from derivative instruments which are not offset by corresponding and opposite gains or losses on the expected future transaction. Regression analysis is performed on initial assessment of the hedge and subsequently every quarter thereafter in order to determine that the hedge instrument will be or has been highly effective in offsetting gains or losses on the future transaction. As discussed in Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, we voluntarily discontinued cash flow hedge accounting for our commodity derivative instruments, effective January 1, 2008. Such a change did not affect our net assets or cash flows at December 31, 2007 and will not require adjustments to our previously reported financial statements. However, the use of mark-to-market accounting for our commodity derivatives will likely add volatility to our reported earnings. We occasionally enter into forward contracts or swap agreements to hedge exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of interest rate swaps or interest rate "locks" used as cash flow hedges are reported in AOCL, to the extent the hedge is effective, until the forecasted transaction occurs, at which time they are recorded as adjustments to interest expense over the term of the related notes. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
 

 

 
Income Tax Expense and Deferred Tax Assets —We are subject to income and other taxes in numerous taxing jurisdictions worldwide. For financial reporting purposes, we provide taxes at rates applicable for the appropriate tax jurisdictions. Estimates of amounts of income tax to be recorded involve interpretation of complex tax laws, assessment of the effects of foreign taxes on domestic taxes, and estimates regarding the timing and amounts of future repatriation of earnings from controlled foreign corporations.
 
The consolidated balance sheets include deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are recognized in the financial statements before they are recognized in the tax returns or when income items are recognized in the tax return before they are recognized in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are available to offset tax payments due in future years. Ultimately, realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the future periods to absorb future deductible temporary differences, loss carryforwards or credits. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management must consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management considers all available evidence (both positive and negative) in determining whether a valuation allowance is required. Such evidence includes the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment, and judgment is required in considering the relative weight of negative and positive evidence. We continue to monitor facts and circumstances in the reassessment of the likelihood that operating loss carryforwards, credits and other deferred tax assets will be utilized prior to their expiration. As a result, we may determine, and we have determined in the past, that a deferred tax asset valuation allowance should be established. Any increases or decreases in a deferred tax asset valuation allowance would impact net income through offsetting changes in income tax expense.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts— We   assess the recoverability of all material trade and other receivables to determine their collectibility on a quarterly basis. We accrue a reserve on a receivable when, based on management’s judgment, it is probable that a receivable will not be collected and the amount of such reserve may be reasonably estimated. In determining the amount of the reserve, management must analyze the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the consolidated financial statements and assess collectibility based on historic results, current collection trends and an evaluation of economic conditions. Over the last three years, we have increased the allowance by approximately $40 million to cover potentially uncollectible balances related to the Ecuador power operations. Certain entities purchasing electricity in Ecuador have been slow to pay amounts due us. We are pursuing various strategies to protect our interests including international arbitration and litigation. However, if estimates are inaccurate, we may incur gains or losses that could have a material effect on our results of operations.
 
Benefit Plans— We sponsor a qualified defined benefit pension plan, a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan (“restoration plan”), and other postretirement benefit plans. The actuarial determination of the projected benefit obligations and related benefit expense requires that certain assumptions be made regarding such variables as expected return on plan assets, discount rates, rates of future compensation increases, estimated future employee turnover rates and retirement dates, distribution election rates, mortality rates, retiree utilization rates for health care services and health care cost trend rates. The selection of assumptions requires considerable judgment concerning future events and has a significant impact on the amount of the obligations recorded in the consolidated balance sheets and on the amount of expense included in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
We base our determination of the asset return component of pension expense on a market-related valuation of assets, which reduces year-to-year volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return based on the fair value of assets. Since the market-related value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period, the future value of assets will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded. As of January 1, 2007, cumulative asset gains of approximately $3 million remained to be recognized in the calculation of the market-related value of assets.
 

 

 
In selecting the assumption for expected long-term rate of return on assets, we consider the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for plan benefits included in the projected benefit obligations. This includes considering the returns being earned by the plan assets and the rates of return expected to be available for reinvestment. We assume that the long-term asset mix will be consistent with the target asset allocation of 70% equity and 30% fixed income, with a range of plus or minus 10% acceptable degree of variation in asset allocation. A 1% decrease in the expected return on plan assets assumption would have increased 2007 net periodic benefit cost by approximately $1 million. The expected return assumption used for 2007 was 8.25%.
 
In selecting a discount rate, employers may look to rates of return on high quality fixed-income investments available as of the year-end measurement date and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefits. In order to determine an appropriate December 31, 2007 discount rate, we performed an analysis of the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve (the “CPDC”) for each of our plans. The CPDC uses spot rates that represent the equivalent yield on high quality, zero coupon bonds for specific maturities. We used these rates to develop an equivalent single discount rate based on our plans’ expected future benefit payment streams and duration of plan liabilities. A 1% increase in the discount rate assumption would have decreased 2007 net periodic benefit cost by $4 million and decreased the benefit obligation for the combined plans by $17 million at December 31, 2007. A 1% decrease in the discount rate assumption would have increased 2007 net periodic benefit cost by $5 million and increased the benefit obligation for the combined plans by $20 million at December 31, 2007. The assumed discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost for 2007 was 5.75%. The assumed discount rate used to determine the benefit obligations at December 31, 2007 was 6.5% for our defined benefit pension and restoration plans and 6.25% for our medical and life plans.
 
Effective January 1, 2008, the defined benefit pension plan and restoration plans were amended in order to provide a lump sum option. Certain assumptions were made regarding the percentage of active participants who would elect the lump sum option upon future termination and the percentage of existing deferred vested participants who would elect the lump sum option during 2008. In addition, the amounts of lump sum payments are affected by mortality and interest rate assumptions. The lump sum option increased the projected benefit obligation by $5.5 million at December 31, 2007 and will increase 2008 net periodic benefit cost by approximately $1 million.
 
We adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), as of December 31, 2006. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 11—Benefit Plans .
 
Recently Issued Pronouncements— See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 16—Recently Issued Pronouncements.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Overview
 
Our primary cash needs are to fund capital expenditures related to the acquisition, exploration and development of crude oil and natural gas properties, to repay outstanding borrowings or to pay other contractual commitments and interest payments on debt and to pay dividends. Our traditional sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operations and available borrowing capacity under credit facilities. Funds may also be generated from occasional sales of non-strategic crude oil and natural gas assets. We had $660 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007, compared with $153 million at December 31, 2006. Substantially all of this cash is located in our foreign subsidiaries and would be subject to additional US income taxes if repatriated. The cash is denominated in US dollars and is invested in highly liquid, investment-grade securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. We currently intend to use our international cash to fund international projects, including the development of West Africa.
 
We are monitoring the current conditions in the credit markets. We have reviewed the creditworthiness of the banks and financial institutions with which we maintain our investments as well as the securities underlying our investments. Thus far, our liquidity and financial position have not been affected. We believe that losses from nonperformance are unlikely to occur; however, we are not able to predict sudden changes in creditworthiness.
 
Our ratio of debt-to-book capital has decreased from 30% at December 31, 2006, to 28% at December 31, 2007. We define our ratio of debt-to-book capital as total debt (which includes both long-term debt, excluding unamortized discount, and short-term borrowings) divided by the sum of total debt plus shareholders’ equity. Significant changes in our financial position causing a change in the ratio of debt-to-book capital include:
 
 
·
a $75 million increase in total debt from the balance at December 31, 2006;
 
·
a $944 million increase in shareholders’ equity from current year net income;
·
a $102 million decrease in shareholders’ equity due to repurchase of common stock; and
 
·
a $144 million decrease in shareholders’ equity (effected by an increase in AOCL) primarily related to an increase in deferred hedging losses.

 

Cash Flows
 
Summary cash flow information is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
      (in thousands)  
Total cash provided by (used in):
                 
Operating activities
  $ 2,016,573     $ 1,730,306     $ 1,239,878  
Investing activities
    (1,403,089 )     (1,098,339 )     (1,892,488 )
Financing activities
    (107,029 )     (588,880 )     583,137  
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 506,455     $ 43,087     $ (69,473 )
 
Operating Activities— Net cash provided by operating activities increased $286 million, or 17% during 2007 as compared with 2006. The increase was due primarily to higher average realized crude oil prices and higher average realized US natural gas prices. These increases were partially offset by higher exploration expense and general and administrative (“G&A”) expense. In addition, cash flows from operating activities in 2007 included dividends from equity method investments, which had been classified as investing cash flows in 2006. See Results of Operations—Income from Equity Method Investees.
 
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $490 million, or 40%, during 2006 as compared with 2005. The increase was due primarily to higher sales volumes and higher average realized crude oil prices, offset by lower average realized US natural gas prices and increases in total production costs, G&A expense and interest expense .
 
Investing Activities— The primary use of cash in investing activities is for capital spending, which may be offset by proceeds from property sales or dividends from equity method investees. Net cash used in investing activities increased $305 million, or 28% during 2007 as compared with 2006. The change was due primarily to a decrease in divestiture activity in 2007 as compared with 2006, when we sold our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. In addition, investing cash inflows were reduced in 2007 because distributions received from equity method investees were included in operating cash flows. See Results of Operations Income from Equity Method Investees.
 
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $794 million, or 42% during 2006 as compared with 2005. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in acquisition activity in 2006 as compared to the Patina Merger in 2005 and an increase in divestiture activity in 2006, due to the sale of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties, which provided investing cash inflows in 2006.
 

 

 
Financing Activities— Net cash used in financing activities decreased $482 million during 2007 as compared with 2006. The change was due to net increases in the credit facility during 2007 as compared with payments being made to decrease outstanding debt during 2006. In 2007 there was also a net decrease of $297 million in amounts used to repurchase common stock as compared with 2006. Cash flows were provided by financing activities in 2005, as compared with 2006, and totaled $583 million. In 2005, cash was provided by borrowings under the credit facility and exercise of stock options, partially offset by dividend payments and the repayment of debt acquired in the Patina Merger.
 
Acquisition, Capital and Other Exploration Expenditures
 
Expenditure information (on an accrual basis) is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Acquisition, Capital and Other Exploration Expenditures
                 
Lease acquisition of unproved property
  $ 145,326     $ 53,652     $ 16,793  
Exploration expenditures
    371,758       203,035       161,515  
Development expenditures
    1,185,385       1,054,780       662,585  
Corporate and other expenditures
    36,361       35,069       21,478  
Total consolidated capital expenditures
    1,738,830       1,346,536       862,371  
Our share of equity investee development costs
    516       580       27,639  
 Total  
$
1,739,346      $ 1,347,116      $ 890,010   
 
Total capital expenditures during 2007 increased $392 million, or 29%, as compared with 2006. The increase was due to lease acquisition in the US, exploratory activities in West Africa and the North Sea, and increased development activity in the Northern region and Gulf of Mexico area of our US operations. Total capital expenditures during 2006 increased $457 million, or 51%, as compared with 2005. The increase was primarily due to development expenditures in the US and the North Sea. Capital expenditures for 2005 included $275 million of post-merger exploration and development-related expenditures on Patina properties.
 
As a result of the U.S. Exploration acquisition in 2006, we allocated $413 million to proved properties and $131 million to unproved properties. As a result of the Patina Merger in 2005, we allocated $2.6 billion to proved properties and $1.1 billion to unproved properties.
 
Insurance Recoveries
 
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 4—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
 
Our corporate insurance program provides up to $260 million property damage coverage per loss event. However, our insurance carrier’s aggregation limit for catastrophic windstorm events is $750 million. If an insured catastrophic loss event occurs, we could still recover less than our stated limits should the total aggregate losses realized by our carrier exceed its $750 million aggregation limit applicable to any single loss event.
 
We carry additional property damage and control of well coverage for our deepwater Gulf of Mexico and remaining Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. This additional insurance provides coverage only for claims in excess of $100 million, which exceed the $260 million property damage coverage or where the $260 million property damage coverage is reduced by application of the $750 million aggregation limit. We carry business interruption insurance for certain international locations. Effective June 2007, we no longer carry business interruption insurance for our Gulf of Mexico operations.
 
Financing Activities
 
Long-Term Debt— Our long-term debt totaled $1.9 billion (excluding unamortized discount) at December 31, 2007. Maturities range from 2009 to 2097. Our principal source of liquidity is an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). In November 2007, we extended the Credit Facility until December 9, 2012. The commitment is $2.1 billion until December 9, 2011 at which time the commitment reduces to $1.8 billion. The Credit Facility (i) provides for Credit Facility fee rates that range from 5 basis points to 15 basis points per year depending upon our credit rating, (ii) makes available short-term loans up to an aggregate amount of $300 million and (iii) provides for interest rates that are based upon the Eurodollar rate plus a margin that ranges from 20 basis points to 70 basis points depending upon our credit rating and utilization of the Credit Facility.
 

 

 
The Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants. The Credit Facility requires that our total debt to capitalization ratio (as defined in the credit agreement), expressed as a percentage, not exceed 60% at any time. A violation of this covenant could result in a default under the Credit Facility, which would permit the participating banks to restrict our ability to access the Credit Facility and require the immediate repayment of any outstanding advances under the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2007, the total debt to capitalization ratio was 28%, calculated for this purpose as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus shareholders’ equity.
 
The Credit Facility is with certain commercial lending institutions and is available for general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2007, $1.2 billion in borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate applicable to borrowings under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2007 was 5.28%.
 
We also have $650 million of fixed-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2007 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.92%. Maturities range from 2014 to 2097.
 
Installment Payments Due During 2007, we purchased working interests in oil and gas properties in the Piceance basin of western Colorado for $75 million. After making an initial cash payment of $25 million, we owe $50 million in the form of installment payments to the seller. Installments of $25 million each are due on May 12, 2008 and May 11, 2009.  The amount due in 2008 is included in short-term borrowings and the amount due in 2009 is included in long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. Interest on the unpaid amounts is due quarterly. Interest accrues at a LIBOR rate plus .30%.  The interest rate was 5.53% at December 31, 2007.
 
Short-Term Borrowings —Our Credit Facility is supplemented by short-term borrowings under various uncommitted credit lines used for working capital purposes. Uncommitted credit lines may be offered by certain banks from time to time at rates negotiated at the time of borrowing. Other than the installment payments discussed above, there were no short-term borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2007.
 
Interest Rate Locks We occasionally enter into forward contracts or swap agreements to hedge exposure to interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2007, we had entered into two interest rate locks which are scheduled to expire third quarter 2008. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 7—Debt.
 
Cash Interest Payments —We made cash interest payments, net of capitalized interest, of $105 million in 2007, $106 million in 2006 and $84 million in 2005.
 
Common Stock Repurchase Program —During 2007 we completed a common stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in 2006. We repurchased two million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $101 million in 2007 and 8.4 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $399 million in 2006, resulting in a total of 10.4 million shares acquired at an average price of $48.17 per share.
 
Dividends— We paid cash dividends totaling 43.5 cents per common share in 2007, 27.5 cents per common share in 2006 and 15 cents per common share in 2005. On January 22, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of 12.0 cents per common share, which was paid February 19, 2008 to shareholders of record on February 4, 2008. The amount of future dividends will be determined on a quarterly basis at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors.
 
Exercise of Stock Options— Proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaled $25 million in 2007, $63 million in 2006 and $68 million in 2005. Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options fluctuate primarily based on the number of options exercised which is influenced by the price at which our common stock trades on the NYSE in relation to the exercise price of the options issued.
 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We may enter into off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that can give rise to material off-balance sheet obligations. As of December 31, 2007, the material off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that we have entered into included drilling service contracts, operating lease agreements, undrawn letters of credit and derivative contracts. Other than the off-balance sheet arrangements listed above, we have no transactions, arrangements or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect our liquidity or availability of or requirements for capital resources. See Contractual Obligations below for more information regarding off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
The following table summarizes certain contractual obligations that are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and/or disclosed in the accompanying notes. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
   
Payments Due by Period
 
               
2009
   
2011
   
2013
 
   
Total
   
2008
   
and 2010
   
and 2012
   
and Beyond
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Long-term debt (excludes interest) (1)
  $ 1,880,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 1,180,000     $ 650,000  
Drilling and equipment obligations (2) :
                                       
United States drilling and equipment
    462,759       181,337       173,935       107,487       -  
International drilling and equipment
    68,170       68,170       -       -       -  
Purchase obligations (3)
    194,419       194,419       -       -       -  
Throughput agreement (4)
    95,000       -       38,000       38,000       19,000  
Operating lease obligations (5) :
                                       
Office buildings and facilities
    52,894       7,289       14,495       13,247       17,863  
Oil and gas operations equipment
    12,074       5,467       6,607       -       -  
Other long-term liabilities (6) :
                                       
Asset retirement obligations (7)
    144,288       13,332       12,443       13,034       105,479  
Derivative instruments (8)
    603,133       525,159       77,974       -       -  
Total contractual obligations
  $ 3,512,737     $ 1,020,173     $ 348,454     $ 1,351,768     $ 792,342  
 
(1)
Based on the total debt balance outstanding at December 31, 2007, scheduled maturities and interest rates in effect at December 31, 2007, our cash payments for interest would be $109 million in 2008, $108 million in 2009, $107 million in 2010, $107 million in 2011, $107 million in 2012 and $990 million for the remaining years for a total of $1.5 billion. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 7—Debt for additional information regarding our long-term debt obligations.
(2)
Drilling and equipment obligations represent contractual agreements with third party service providers to procure drilling rigs and other related equipment for developmental and exploratory drilling facilities.  See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding our drilling and equipment obligations.
 (3)
Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed and minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding our purchase obligations.
(4)
In January 2007, we entered into a five-year throughput agreement. The transporting pipeline is expected to be completed and operational in 2009.  See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding our throughput agreement.
 (5)
Operating lease obligations represent non-cancelable leases for office buildings and facilities and oil and gas operations equipment used in our daily operations. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

 
 
—Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding our operating lease obligations.
(6)
The table does not include our deferred compensation liabilities of $225 million and our accrued benefit costs of $51 million as specific payment dates are unknown. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 11—Benefit Plans for additional information on our deferred compensation liability and our accrued benefit costs.
(7)
Asset retirement obligations are discounted. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 6—Asset Retirement Obligations for additional information on our asset retirement obligations.
(8)
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for additional information on our derivative instrument obligations.
 
We accrued approximately $12 million as of December 31, 2007, for an insurance contingency due to our membership in Oil Insurance Limited (OIL). OIL is a mutual insurance company which insures specific property, pollution liability and other catastrophic risks. As part of our membership, we are contractually committed to pay termination fees should we elect to withdraw from OIL. We do not anticipate withdrawing from OIL; however, the potential termination fee is calculated annually based on OIL’ s past losses and the liability reflecting this potential charge has been accrued.
 
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we maintain letters of credit in support of certain performance obligations of our subsidiaries. Outstanding letters of credit totaled approximately $1 million at December 31, 2007.
 
Other
 
Contributions to Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans —We made contributions to the pension, restoration and other postretirement benefit plans totaling $12 million during 2007, $36 million during 2006, and $14 million during 2005. The actual return on plan assets was $13 million in both 2007 and 2006. The investment return has tended to follow market performance. In August 2006, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Act) was signed into law. Certain provisions of this Act changed the calculation related to the maximum contribution amount deductible for income tax purposes and require that pension plans become fully funded over a seven-year period beginning in 2008. As a result of previous contributions made to the pension plan, there are no required contributions expected during 2008. We may, however, make additional contributions to our pension plan. We expect to make contributions of $4 million to the unfunded restoration and medical and life plans in 2008. This amount is equal to the benefits expected to be paid by those plans.
 
Income Taxes— We made cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds, of $149 million during 2007, $115 million during 2006 and $122 million during 2005.
 
Contingencies— During 2007, we paid a total of $56 million to settle legal proceedings; these amounts had been accrued previously. During 2006 and 2005, no significant payments were made to settle any legal proceedings. We regularly analyze current information and accrue for probable liabilities on the disposition of certain matters, as necessary. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Net Income
 
Net income for 2007 was $944 million, a 39% increase over 2006. Factors contributing to the increase in net income from 2006 to 2007 included:
 
 
·
a $332 million, or 11%, increase in total revenues, due primarily to higher average realized crude oil prices and higher average realized US natural gas prices and an increase in income from equity method investees;
 
·
a $395 million decrease in loss on derivative instruments; and  
 
offset by:
 
·
a $208 million decrease in gains from asset sales;
 
·
a $105 million increase in DD&A expense;
 
·
a $51 million loss on involuntary conversion expense; and
 
·
a $51 million increase in oil and gas exploration expense.
 
 
 

Net income for 2006 was $678 million, a 5% increase over 2005. Factors contributing to the increase in net income from 2005 to 2006 included:
 
 
·
a $753 million, or 34%, increase in total revenues, driven primarily by a full year of Patina operations and nine months of U.S. Exploration operations and higher average realized oil prices;
 
·
an increase of $215 million in gains from asset sales;  
offset by:
 
·
an increase in loss on derivative instruments of $360 million; and
  · a $232 million increase in DD&A expense.
 
Natural Gas Information
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Natural gas sales
  $ 1,271,866     $ 1,211,782     $ 1,023,644  
 
Average daily natural gas sales volumes and average realized sales prices were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
Mcfpd
   
$/Mcf
   
Mcfpd
   
$/Mcf
   
Mcfpd
   
$/Mcf
 
United States (1)
    412,212     $ 7.51       451,712     $ 6.61       343,953     $ 7.43  
West Africa (2)
    132,464       0.29       45,422       0.37       65,581       0.25  
North Sea
    6,235       6.54       8,130       8.00       9,299       5.93  
Israel
    110,820       2.79       92,894       2.72       66,377       2.68  
Ecuador (3)
    25,713       -       24,475       -       22,795       -  
Other International
    -       -       294       0.96       190       1.10  
Total
    687,444     $ 5.26       622,927     $ 5.55       508,195     $ 5.78  
 
(1)
Reflects an increase of $1.12 per Mcf in 2007 and reductions of $0.25 per Mcf in 2006 and $0.77 per Mcf in 2005 from hedging activities.
(2)
Natural gas from the Alba field in Equatorial Guinea is under contract for $0.25 per MMBtu to a methanol plant, an LPG plant and an LNG facility. The methanol and LPG plants are owned by affiliated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The volumes sold by the LPG plant are included in the table below under crude oil information. Natural gas volumes include sales to an LNG facility of 78,090 Mcfpd 2007; there were no natural gas sales to the LNG facility before 2007. The natural gas sold to the LNG facility and methanol plant has a lower Btu content than the natural gas sold to the LPG plant. As a result of the natural gas volumes sold to the LNG plant in 2007, the average price received on an Mcf basis is lower.  For 2007 and 2006, the price on an Mcf basis has been adjusted to reflect the Btu content on gas sales.
(3)
The natural gas-to-power project in Ecuador is 100% owned by one of our subsidiaries, and intercompany natural gas sales are eliminated for accounting purposes. Electricity sales included in total revenues totaled $71 million in 2007, $72 million in 2006 and $74 million in 2005.
 
2007 Compared with 2006 —Natural gas sales increased a net $60 million, or 5%, during 2007 as compared with 2006. The increase was affected by both volume and price changes. In the US, natural gas sales increased $40 million from the previous year despite lower sales volumes. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico volumes were slightly higher than 2006, while development activity in the Piceance basin and a full year of production from U.S. Exploration properties acquired in 2006 resulted in increased production in the Northern region. However, the Gulf Coast onshore area had lower production due to natural field decline, and there was a loss of production due to the sale of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties in 2006. The Northern region also experienced a temporary decline in production due to third party processing downtime and inclement weather. The net production decrease was more than offset by a 14% increase in average realized natural gas prices.
 

 

 
Internationally, West Africa natural gas sales increased $8 million from the previous year. Natural gas volumes were higher due to increased sales of natural gas from the Alba field in Equatorial Guinea; however, the effect of higher production was somewhat offset by lower average realized gas prices. In the North Sea, natural gas production decreased 23% as compared with the prior year primarily due to natural field decline. Lower production, combined with lower average realized prices, resulted in a $9 million decrease in North Sea natural gas sales. In Israel, natural gas sales increased $21 million due to record sales volumes. There was a full year of sales to Israeli Electric Company’s Reading power plant in Tel Aviv, as well as the start up of sales to a desalinization plant and a paper mill.
 
2006 Compared with 2005— Natural gas sales increased a net $188 million, or 18%, during 2006 as compared with 2005. Again, the change was caused by both significant volume and price changes. In the US natural gas sales increased by $157 million from the previous year due to additional US production from Patina properties acquired in 2005 and from U.S. Exploration properties acquired in May 2006. In addition, there were increases in deepwater Gulf of Mexico production where three new developments came on stream at Swordfish, Ticonderoga and Lorien. However, increases due to higher gas sales volumes were partially offset by lower average realized prices.
 
Internationally, West Africa natural gas sales were flat year-to-year; however, there was a decline in sales volumes due to the turnaround of the AMPCO methanol plant in Equatorial Guinea. The turnaround lasted 57 days and was followed by reduced production levels caused by 35 days of compressor repairs. The production decline was completely offset by an increase in average realized natural gas prices. In the North Sea, natural field decline resulted in reduced sales volumes, but this reduction was more than offset by the increase in average realized prices. Israel experienced a $4 million increase in natural gas sales primarily due to increased demand from Israel Electric Corporation Limited, a full year of sales to Bazan Oil Refinery and commencement of natural gas sales to the Reading power plant in Tel Aviv, Israel.
 
Natural Gas Hedging Activities —Natural gas sales are net of the effects of derivative contracts that are accounted for as cash flow hedges and included an increase of $169 million in 2007, and a reduction of $42 million in 2006 and $97 million in 2005 from hedging activities.  Natural gas sales in 2007 include a $182 million non-cash increase related to hedge contracts that were redesignated at the time of the Gulf of Mexico shelf property sale in 2006 and settled during 2007. See Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Crude Oil Information
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Crude oil sales
  $ 1,694,233     $ 1,489,459     $ 942,778  
 
Average daily crude oil sales volumes and average realized sales prices were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
   2007
 
   2006
   
 2005
 
   
Production (1)
 
Sales
 
Production (1)
   
Sales
   
Sales (2)
 
   
Bopd
 
Bopd
 
$/Bbl
 
Bopd
   
Bopd
 
$/Bbl
   
Bopd
 
$/Bbl
 
United States (3)
    42,332   42,332   $ 53.22   45,798     45,798   $ 50.68     25,941   $ 46.67  
West Africa (4)
    15,523   15,070     71.27   17,326     17,860     62.51     17,786     42.51  
North Sea
    12,813   12,505     76.47   3,988     3,717     67.43     5,380     52.68  
Other International (5)
    6,806   6,674     53.69   7,491     7,540     52.05     7,851     42.37  
Total Consolidated Operations
    77,474   76,581     60.61   74,603     74,915     54.47     56,958     45.35  
Equity Investees (6)
    8,014   7,684     55.09   7,531     8,032     45.83     3,240     43.43  
Total
    85,488   84,265   $ 60.10   82,134     82,947   $ 53.64     60,198   $ 45.25  
 
 

 

 
(1)
The variance between production and sales volumes is attributable to the timing of liquid hydrocarbon tanker liftings.
(2)
Sales volumes equal production volumes in 2005.
(3)
Reflects reductions of $13.68 per Bbl in 2007, $11.41 per Bbl in 2006 and $8.03 per Bbl in 2005 from hedging activities.
(4)
Reflects reductions of $2.19 per Bbl in 2007 and $9.93 per Bbl in 2005 from hedging activities. We did not hedge West Africa crude oil sales in 2006.
(5)
Other international includes China and Argentina.
(6)
Volumes represent sales of condensate and LPG from the Alba plant in Equatorial Guinea. LPG sales volumes totaled 5,848 Bopd in 2007, 6,294 Bopd in 2006 and 2,328 Bopd in 2005.
 
2007 Compared with 2006 —Crude oil sales increased a net $205 million, or 14%, during 2007 as compared with 2006. The increase was affected by both volume and price changes. In the US, crude oil sales declined by $25 million from the previous year. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico volumes were lower due to well performance, third-party facility restrictions and storm shut-in. The Gulf Coast onshore area had lower production due to natural field decline, and there was a loss of production due to the sale of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties in 2006. Northern region production was negatively impacted by severe winter weather in the Rocky Mountains during the first and fourth quarters of 2007. However, development activity in the Wattenberg field, as well as a full year of production from U.S. Exploration properties acquired in 2006, resulted in increased production in our Northern region, and the overall US volume decline was partially offset by higher average realized prices.
 
Internationally, West Africa crude oil sales declined by $15 million from the previous year. Volumes declined due to increased downtime and lower condensate yields in Equatorial Guinea, but the decline was offset by substantially higher average realized crude oil prices. In January 2007, production began at the Dumbarton development in the North Sea, and, as a result, crude oil production was more than triple that of the prior year. North Sea crude oil sales increased $257 million over 2006 due to the increased volumes and, to a lesser extent, higher average realized prices. Other international crude oil sales declined $12 million. China experienced lower volumes due to facility downtime and natural field decline.
 
2006 Compared with 2005— Crude oil sales increased a net $547 million, or 58%, during 2006 as compared with 2005. Again, the increase was caused by significant volume and price changes. In the US crude oil sales increased by $405 million from the previous year due to additional US production from Patina properties acquired in 2005 and from U.S. Exploration properties acquired in May 2006. In addition, there were increases in deepwater Gulf of Mexico production where three new developments came on stream at Swordfish, Ticonderoga and Lorien.
 
Internationally, higher average realized prices resulted in an increase of $132 million in West Africa crude oil sales and contributed to most of the $22 million increase in other international crude oil sales. The North Sea experienced a $12 million decrease in crude oil sales. Natural field decline and timing of tanker liftings resulted in lower sales volumes, the effect of which was mitigated by an increase in average realized crude oil prices.
 
Crude Oil Hedging Activities —Crude oil sales are net of the effects of derivative contracts that are accounted for as cash flow hedges and included a reduction of $223 million in 2007, $191 million in 2006 and $140 million in 2005 from hedging activities.  See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
We use various derivative instruments in connection with anticipated crude oil and natural gas sales to minimize the impact of product price fluctuations. Such instruments include variable to fixed price swaps, costless collars and basis swaps. Although these derivative instruments expose us to credit risk, we monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties and believe that losses from nonperformance are unlikely to occur. Hedging gains and losses related to crude oil and natural gas production are recorded in oil and gas sales. See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Commodity Price Risk and Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 

 

Income from Equity Method Investees
 
We own a 45% interest in AMPCO, which owns and operates a methanol plant and related facilities and a 28% interest in Alba Plant, which owns and operates an LPG processing plant. The plants and related facilities are located in Equatorial Guinea. We account for investments in entities that we do not control but over which we exert significant influence using the equity method of accounting. Our share of operations of equity method investees was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Net income (in thousands):
                 
AMPCO and affiliates
  $ 82,877     $ 38,024     $ 56,896  
Alba Plant
    128,051       101,338       33,916  
Distributions/dividends (in thousands):
                       
AMPCO and affiliates
    96,483       37,350       59,625  
Alba Plant
    132,251       155,158       -  
Sales volumes (1) :
                       
Methanol (Kgal)
    160,540       109,942       162,446  
Condensate (Bopd)
    1,836       1,738       912  
LPG (Bpd)
    5,848       6,294       2,328  
Production volumes (1) :
                       
Condensate (Bopd)
    1,860       1,730       912  
LPG (Bpd)
    6,148       5,801       2,328  
Average realized prices:
                       
Methanol (per gallon)
  $ 1.09     $ 0.90     $ 0.77  
Condensate (per Bbl)
    74.87       66.60       55.76  
LPG (per Bbl)
    48.87       40.10       38.63  
 
(1)
The variance between production and sales volumes is attributable to the timing of liquid hydrocarbon tanker liftings.
 
Net income from AMPCO and affiliates increased substantially in 2007 relative to 2006 due to a 46% increase in methanol sales volumes and a 21% increase in average realized methanol prices. The increase in methanol sales volumes was due to a 57-day shutdown of methanol production for the plant turnaround that occurred during May and June 2006 followed by 35 days of compressor repairs.
 
Net income from AMPCO and affiliates decreased 33% in 2006 relative to 2005 due to a 32% decrease in methanol sales volumes offset by a 17% increase in average realized methanol prices. The decrease in methanol sales volumes was due to the 57-day shutdown of methanol production for the plant turnaround that occurred during May and June 2006 followed by 35 days of compressor repairs. No such shutdown or plant turnaround occurred during 2005.
 
Net income from Alba Plant increased 26% in 2007 relative to 2006 due to a 22% increase in average realized LPG prices and a 12% increase in average realized condensate prices.
 
Net income from Alba Plant increased substantially in 2006 relative to 2005 due to an almost threefold increase in LPG sales volumes, an almost twofold increase in condensate sales volumes and a 19% increase in average realized condensate prices. The increases in LPG and condensate sales volumes reflected the completion and ramp up to full production of the Phase 2B liquids expansion project.
 
For 2007, $132 million received from Alba Plant was classified within operating cash flows as a dividend from equity method investee as compared with 2006 in which the distributions were classified within investing cash flows as a repayment of a loan. The change in classification was the result of all outstanding loans being repaid to us by Alba Plant in December 2006.
 

 

 
Costs and Expenses
 
Production Costs—Production costs were as follows :
 
         
United
   
West
   
North
         
Other Int'l/
 
   
Total
   
States
   
Africa
   
Sea
   
Israel
   
Corporate (2)
 
    (in thousands)   
Year Ended December 31, 2007
       
Oil and gas operating costs (1)
  $ 299,622     $ 190,723     $ 39,222     $ 37,987     $ 7,712     $ 23,978  
Workover and repair expense
    22,830       22,516       -       -       -       314  
Lease operating expense
    322,452       213,239       39,222       37,987       7,712       24,292  
Production and ad valorem taxes
    113,547       91,225       -       -       -       22,322  
Transportation expense
    51,699       39,542       -       10,523       -       1,634  
Total production costs
  $ 487,698     $ 344,006     $ 39,222     $ 48,510     $ 7,712     $ 48,248  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                               
Oil and gas operating costs (1)
  $ 270,136     $ 205,348     $ 26,557     $ 11,655     $ 9,066     $ 17,510  
Workover and repair expense
    46,951       46,793       -       -       -       158  
Lease operating expense
    317,087       252,141       26,557       11,655       9,066       17,668  
Production and ad valorem taxes
    108,979       85,960       -       -       -       23,019  
Transportation expense
    28,542       20,728       -       7,010       -       804  
Total production costs
  $ 454,608     $ 358,829     $ 26,557     $ 18,665     $ 9,066     $ 41,491  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                               
Oil and gas operating costs (1)
  $ 203,833     $ 136,087     $ 30,661     $ 12,244     $ 8,504     $ 16,337  
Workover and repair expense
    14,027       13,734       -       259       -       34  
Lease operating expense
    217,860       149,821       30,661       12,503       8,504       16,371  
Production and ad valorem taxes
    78,703       65,428       -       -       -       13,275  
Transportation expense
    16,764       9,350       -       6,562       -       852  
Total production costs
  $ 313,327     $ 224,599     $ 30,661     $ 19,065     $ 8,504     $ 30,498  
 
(1)
Oil and gas operating costs include labor, fuel, repairs, replacements, saltwater disposal and other related lifting costs.
(2)
Other international includes Ecuador, China and Argentina.
 
Oil and gas operating costs increased $29 million, or 11%, from 2006 to 2007. The increase is primarily the result of expanded operations in Equatorial Guinea and the North Sea.
 
Oil and gas operating costs increased $66 million, or 33%, from 2005 to 2006 primarily as a result of our expanded operations. Three new deepwater Gulf of Mexico development projects came online between December 2005 and April 2006. Fiscal year 2006 represented a full year of Patina operations, and we acquired U.S. Exploration in 2006. In addition, the high commodity price environment resulted in higher service, contract labor and fuel costs. Insurance costs were also higher in 2006 due in part to increased rates for property damage coverage combined with the added costs of providing business interruption coverage on deepwater Gulf of Mexico assets.
 
Workover and repair expense decreased $24 million during 2007 as compared with 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in hurricane-related repair expense, which totaled $30 million in 2006 and $1 million in 2007.
 
Workover and repair expense increased $33 million during 2006 as compared with 2005. Expense for 2006 included $30 million ($0.45 per BOE) of hurricane-related repair expense.
 

 

 
Production and ad valorem tax expense increased $5 million, or 4%, during 2007 as compared with 2006 and increased $30 million, or 38%, during 2006 as compared with 2005. The increase reflects additional production from U.S. Exploration and Patina properties. These properties have proportionately more production subject to such taxes.
 
Transportation expense increased $23 million, or 81%, during 2007 as compared with 2006. The increase was due primarily due to changes in the terms of certain sales contracts for Northern region production and increased production in the North Sea. Transportation expense increased $12 million, or 70%, during 2006 as compared with 2005. The increase was primarily due to a full year of Patina operations and U.S. Exploration.
 
Selected expenses on a per BOE of sales volume basis were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Oil and gas operating  costs
  $ 4.29     $ 4.14     $ 3.94  
Workover and repair expense
    0.33       0.72       0.27  
Lease operating costs
    4.62       4.86       4.21  
Production and ad valorem taxes
    1.63       1.67       1.52  
Transportation expense
    0.74       0.44       0.33  
Total production costs (1) (2)
  $ 6.99     $ 6.97     $ 6.06  

(1)
Consolidated unit rates exclude sales volumes and costs attributable to equity method investees.
(2) Sales volumes include natural gas sales to an LNG facility in Equatorial Guinea that began late first quarter of 2007. The inclusion of these volumes reduced the unit rate by $0.51 per BOE for 2007.
 
The unit rates of total production costs per BOE, converting gas to oil on the basis of six Mcf per barrel, have been increasing year-over-year since 2005. The increases are due to rising third-party costs, including insurance, hurricane-related repair expense, and higher production taxes.
 

 

 
Oil and Gas Exploration Expense— Exploration expense was as follows:
 
         
United
   
West
   
North
         
Other Int'l/
 
   
Total
   
States
   
Africa
   
Sea
   
Israel
   
Corporate (1)
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                               
Dry hole expense
  $ 90,210     $ 49,473     $ 40,399     $ 5     $ -     $ 333  
Unproved lease amortization
    16,013       15,176       -       103       -       734  
Seismic
    64,856       55,258       939       8,184       691       (216 )
Staff expense
    45,030       11,900       2,106       8,318       645       22,061  
Other
    2,973       2,423       100       340       82       28  
Total exploration expense
  $ 219,082     $ 134,230     $ 43,544     $ 16,950     $ 1,418     $ 22,940  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                         
Dry hole expense
  $ 70,325     $ 66,150     $ 46     $ 4,129     $ -     $ -  
Unproved lease amortization
    18,836       18,823       -       13       -       -  
Seismic
    37,676       29,320       4,204       685       3       3,464  
Staff expense
    38,861       12,710       2,887       4,816       250       18,198  
Other
    2,226       1,083       192       879       33       39  
Total exploration expense
  $ 167,924     $ 128,086     $ 7,329     $ 10,522     $ 286     $ 21,701  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                         
Dry hole expense
  $ 98,015     $ 95,678     $ 1,403     $ 932     $ 2     $ -  
Unproved lease amortization
    17,855       17,855       -       -       -       -  
Seismic
    21,761       11,631       316       1,544       -       8,270  
Staff expense
    34,945       16,255       3,760       2,690       189       12,051  
Other
    5,850       4,974       (16 )     819       32       41  
Total exploration expense
  $ 178,426     $ 146,393     $ 5,463     $ 5,985     $ 223     $ 20,362  

(1)
Other international includes Ecuador, China, Argentina and Surname.
 
Exploration expense increased $51 million, or 30% during 2007 as compared with 2006. US dry hole expense decreased $17 million due to a reduction in the number of dry holes drilled during 2007. Dry hole expense increased $40 million in West Africa and included amounts related to a dry exploratory well in Equatorial Guinea and expense related to a secondary target of an exploration well in Cameroon in which commercial hydrocarbons were not found. Seismic expense increased a net $27 million during 2007 as compared with 2006, primarily due to increases in US seismic expense incurred in support of the 2007 Central Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf Sale. Staff expense increased a net $6 million primarily due to new venture activity.
 
Exploration expense decreased $11 million, or 6% during 2006 as compared with 2005. US dry hole expense was $30 million less due to the reduction in the number of dry holes drilled. US seismic expense increased $18 million due primarily to the expansion of our deepwater Gulf of Mexico 3D seismic database. In addition, other international staff expense increased $6 million due to new venture activity.
 
Exploration expense included stock-based compensation expense of $2 million in 2007 and $1 million in 2006.
 

 

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Expense DD&A expense was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
United States
  $ 574,001     $ 543,431     $ 311,153  
West Africa
    25,315       23,620       27,121  
North Sea
    79,450       8,123       9,888  
Israel
    17,842       13,947       11,188  
Other International, corporate, and other
    31,373       33,487       31,194  
Total DD&A expense
  $ 727,981     $ 622,608     $ 390,544  
Unit rate of DD&A per BOE (1) (2)
  $ 10.43     $ 9.54     $ 7.55  
 
(1)
Consolidated unit rates exclude sales volumes and costs attributable to equity method investees.
( 2) Sales volumes include natural gas sales to an LNG facility in Equatorial Guinea that began late first quarter of 2007. The inclusion of these volumes reduced the unit rate by $0 .62 per BOE for 2007.
 
Total DD&A expense has been increasing since 2005 primarily due to higher production volumes. The increase in the unit rate for 2007 as compared with 2006 was primarily due to higher acquisition and development costs in the the US and the Dumbarton North Sea development. The increase in the unit rate for 2006 as compared with 2005 was primarily due to the change in the mix of our production volumes, in particular, deepwater Gulf of Mexico production.
 
DD&A expense includes abandoned assets cost of $5 million in 2007, $1 million in 2006 and $11 million in 2005.
 
General and Administrative Expense— General and administrative (“G&A”) expense was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
General and administrative expense (in thousands)
  $ 206,378     $ 164,541     $ 100,125  
Unit rate per BOE (1) (2)
  $ 2.96     $ 2.52     $ 1.94  
 
(1)
Consolidated unit rates exclude sales volumes and costs attributable to equity method investees. 
(2) Sales volumes include natural gas sales to an LNG facility in Equatorial Guinea that began late first quarter of 2007. The inclusion of these volumes reduced the unit rate by $0.21 per BOE for 2007.
 
G&A expense increased $42 million, or 25%, during 2007 as compared with 2006 due to higher salaries and wages, including incentive compensation programs, resulting from an increase in the number of employees and results exceeding targeted performance goals. In addition, the effects of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) , combined with additional equity-based awards, resulted in a $14 million increase in stock-based compensation expense included in G&A during 2007. Stock-based compensation expense included in G&A totaled $25 million in 2007.
 
G&A expense increased $64 million, or 64% during 2006 as compared with 2005. The increase was due to higher salaries and wages and the inclusion of a full year of G&A expense related to Patina operations. Salaries and wages also reflected wage inflation due to a tight labor market and expanded activity across the industry driven by higher commodity prices. In addition, the effects of adoption of SFAS 123(R), combined with additional equity-based awards, resulted in a $7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense included in G&A during 2006. Stock-based compensation expense included in G&A was $11 million in 2006 as compared with $4 million in 2005.
 
G&A includes actuarially-computed net periodic benefit cost related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $17 million in 2007, $19 million in 2006 and $11 million in 2005.
 

 

 
Interest Expense and Capitalized Interest Interest expense and capitalized interest were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Interest expense, net
  $ 112,957     $ 117,045     $ 87,541  
Capitalized interest
    16,595       12,515       8,684  
 
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest, decreased in 2007 primarily due to a declining rate of interest applicable to the Credit Facility from 5.69% at December 31, 2006 to 5.28% at December 31, 2007. Interest expense, net of capitalized interest, increased in 2006 due to additional borrowings related to the Patina Merger and acquisition of U.S. Exploration and to increases in the interest rate applicable to the Credit Facility from 4.82% at December 31, 2005 to 5.69% at December 31, 2006.
 
Interest is capitalized on development projects using an interest rate equivalent to the average rate paid on long-term debt. Capitalized interest is included in the cost of oil and gas assets and amortized with other costs on a unit-of-production basis. The majority of the capitalized interest related to long lead-time projects in West Africa, the North Sea and deepwater Gulf of Mexico in 2007; the North Sea and deepwater Gulf of Mexico in 2006; and deepwater Gulf of Mexico and projects in West Africa in 2005.
 
We occasionally enter into forward contracts or swap agreements to hedge exposure to interest rate risk. At December 31, 2007, AOCL included a deferred loss of $4 million, net of tax, related to interest rate swaps. $3 million of this amount is being reclassified into earnings, at the rate of $0.8 million per year, as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of our 5-1/4% senior notes due 2014. The remaining $1 million loss relates to interest rate locks that will expire in third quarter 2008. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities .
 
(Gain) Loss on Derivative Instruments —See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Gain on Sale of Assets See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
 
Loss on Involuntary Conversion See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 4 Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
 
Electricity Sales—Ecuador Integrated Power Project —Through our subsidiaries, EDC Ecuador Ltd. and MachalaPower Cia. Ltda., we have a 100% ownership interest in an integrated natural gas-to-power project. The project includes the Amistad natural gas field, offshore Ecuador, which supplies fuel to the Machala power plant. Electricity sales are included in other revenues and electricity generation expense is included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
Operating data is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Electricity sales (in thousands)
  $ 70,916     $ 71,603     $ 74,228  
Electricity generation expense (in thousands)
    56,552       59,494       53,137  
Operating income (in thousands)
    14,364       12,109       21,091  
Power generation (MW)
    911,830       865,983       799,160  
Average power price ($/Kwh)
  $ 0.078     $ 0.083     $ 0.093  
 
The volume of natural gas produced and electric power generated in Ecuador are related to thermal electricity demand in Ecuador which typically declines at the onset of the rainy season. When Ecuador has sufficient rainfall to allow hydroelectric power producers to provide base load power, we provide electricity only to meet peak demand. As seasonal rains subside, we experience increasing demand for thermal electricity.
 
Electricity generation expense includes net increases in the allowance for doubtful accounts of $14 million in 2007, $15 million in 2006 and $11 million in 2005. These increases have been made to cover potentially uncollectible balances related to the Ecuador power operations. Certain entities purchasing electricity in Ecuador have been slow to pay amounts due us. We are pursuing various strategies to protect our interests including international arbitration and litigation.
 
 

 

 
Gathering, Marketing and Processing —We market a portion of our US natural gas production, as well as certain third-party natural gas. We sell natural gas directly to end-users, natural gas marketers, industrial users, interstate  and intrastate pipelines, power generators and local distribution companies. We also market certain third-party crude oil. Gathering, marketing and processing (“GMP”) proceeds are included in other revenues and GMP expenses are included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Gross margin from GMP activities was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
GMP proceeds
  $ 24,087     $ 27,876     $ 55,261  
GMP expenses
    17,539       18,664       28,067  
Gross margin
  $ 6,548     $ 9,212     $ 27,194  
 
We employ derivative instruments in connection with purchases and sales of third-party production to lock in profits or limit exposure to commodity price risk. Most of the purchases we make are on an index basis. However, purchasers in the markets in which we sell often require fixed or NYMEX-related pricing. We record gains and losses on these derivative instruments using mark-to-market accounting. Gains (losses) were de minimis for 2007, 2006 and 2005. GMP proceeds for 2005 includes a gain of $11 million for the sale of certain gas sales and transportation contractual assets.
 
Deferred Compensation Expense —In connection with the Patina Merger, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities related to a deferred compensation plan. The assets of the deferred compensation plan are held in a rabbi trust and include shares of our common stock and mutual fund investments. At December 31, 2007, 45% of the market value of the assets in the rabbi trust related to our common stock. Deferred compensation expense totaled $34 million, $16 million and $15 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 11—Benefit Plans.
 
Impairment of Operating Assets —We recorded impairments of $4 million in 2007, $9 million in 2006 and $5 million in 2005, primarily related to downward reserve revisions on proved US oil and gas properties and/or adjustment of the carrying value of properties to their fair values. Impairment expense is included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
Income Taxes— The income tax provision was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Income tax provision (in thousands)
  $ 423,697     $ 417,789     $ 322,940  
Effective rate
    31.0 %     38.1 %     33.3 %
 
Several factors resulted in a decrease in our effective tax rate for 2007. The major factor was that, in 2006, $100 million of goodwill write-off associated with the sale of the Gulf of Mexico shelf properties was not deductible, which increased the rate for 2006. Other factors were an increase in deferred tax assets arising from foreign tax credits, a decrease in the Chinese tax rate, and the realization of additional income from equity method investees which is a favorable permanent difference in calculating the income tax expense.
 
Our effective tax rate increased significantly in 2006 from 2005 due to several factors. The most significant factor was the nondeductible goodwill write-off of $100 million related to the sale of the Gulf of Mexico shelf properties discussed in the preceding paragraph. The rate was also impacted by decreases in our US deferred tax assets arising from future foreign tax credits due to changes in the limitation on our ability to claim foreign tax credits. In addition, a change in UK tax law increased our UK tax expense in 2006. Offsetting these increases was a reduction in the effective tax rate due to an increase in earnings from equity method investees, which is a favorable permanent difference in calculating income tax expense.
 
The 2005 effective tax rate was impacted by our ability to claim a foreign tax credit for the income taxes paid by foreign branch operations, as well as a benefit realized on the repatriation of foreign earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 7A.
 
Commodity Price Risk

Derivative Instruments Held for Non-Trading Purposes - W e are   exposed to market risk in the normal course of business operations. We believe that we are well positioned with our mix of crude oil and natural gas reserves to take advantage of future price increases that may occur. However, the uncertainty of crude oil and natural gas prices continues to impact the oil and gas industry. Due to the volatility of crude oil and natural gas prices, we have used derivative instruments as a means of managing our exposure to commodity price changes.  
 
At December 31, 2007, we had entered into variable to fixed price swaps, costless collars and basis swaps related to crude oil and natural gas sales. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data— Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had a net unrealized loss of $408 million (pre-tax) related to crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments entered into for hedging purposes. A net unrealized loss of $255 million, net of tax, is recorded in AOCL in the consolidated balance sheets. We will reclassify the loss to earnings as adjustments to revenue when future sales occur.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
We are exposed to interest rate risk related to our variable and fixed interest rate debt. As of December 31, 2007, we had $1.9 billion (excluding unamortized discount) of long-term debt outstanding. Of this amount, $650 million was fixed-rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 6.92%. We believe that anticipated near term changes in interest rates will not have a material effect on the fair value of our fixed-rate debt and will not expose us to the risk of earnings or cash flow loss.
 
The remainder of our long-term debt, $1.2 billion at December 31, 2007, was variable-rate debt. We also had $25 million of current installment payments at December 31, 2007. Variable rate debt exposes us to the risk of earnings or cash flow loss due to increases in market interest rates. We estimate that a hypothetical 25 basis point change in the floating interest rates applicable to the December 31, 2007 balance of variable-rate debt would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $3 million.
 
We occasionally enter into forward contracts or swap agreements to hedge exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of interest rate swaps or interest rate “locks” used as cash flow hedges are reported in AOCL, to the extent the hedge is effective, until the forecasted transaction occurs, at which time they are recorded as adjustments to interest expense. At December 31, 2007, AOCL included $4 million, net of tax, related to interest rate locks. A portion of this amount is being reclassified into earnings as adjustments to interest expense over the term of our 5¼% Senior Notes due April 2014. The remainder relates to interest rate locks that are scheduled to settle during third quarter 2008. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 12-Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
We are also exposed to interest rate risk related to our short-term investments. As of December 31, 2007, substantially all of our cash was invested in highly liquid, short-term investment-grade securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. A hypothetical 25 basis point change in the floating interest rates applicable to the December 31, 2007 balance would result in a change in annual interest income of approximately $2 million.
 
Foreign Currency Risk
 
We have not entered into foreign currency derivatives. The US dollar is considered the functional currency for each of our international operations. Transactions that are completed in a foreign currency are remeasured into US dollars and recorded in the financial statements at the prevailing currency exchange rates. We do not have any significant monetary assets or liabilities denominated in a foreign currency other than our foreign deferred tax liabilities in certain foreign tax jurisdictions. An increase in exchange rates between the US dollar and the currency of the foreign tax jurisdiction in which these liabilities are located could result in the use of additional cash to settle these liabilities. However,  transaction gains or losses were not material in any of the periods presented. We do not believe we are currently exposed to any material risk of loss on this basis. Such gains or losses are included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
 

 

 
Item 8.
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Consolidated Financial Statements of Noble Energy, Inc.
 
   
51
   
52
   
53
   
54
   
55
   
56
   
57
   
58
   
59
   
93
   
102

 

 

 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect or prevent misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or processes may deteriorate.
 
As of December 31, 2007, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment, management determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on those criteria. Management included in its assessment of internal control over financial reporting all consolidated entities.
 
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 which is included herein.
 
  Noble Energy, Inc.
 

 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Noble Energy, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Noble Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity,  comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements for the periods referred to below of the Alba Plant LLC (Alba) and the Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC (AMPCO), the investments in which, as disclosed in Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements are accounted for by the equity method of accounting.  The Company’s investment in Alba as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $142.5 million and $146.1 million, respectively, and the equity in earnings in Alba was $128.1 million and $101.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The equity in earnings for AMPCO was $54.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.  The financial statements of Alba as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the years then ended and AMPCO for the year ended December 31, 2005 were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Alba and AMPCO, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Noble Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation.  As also discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 31, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Noble Energy, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on   criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
                                                                            KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
February 25, 2008

 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Noble Energy, Inc.:
 
We have audited Noble Energy, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Noble Energy, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Noble Energy, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Noble Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
 
 
KPMG LLP
   
Houston, Texas
 
February 25, 2008
 

 

 
Noble Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
(in thousands, except share amounts)
 
             
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
ASSETS
           
Current Assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 659,863     $ 153,408  
Accounts receivable - trade, net
    594,009       586,882  
Deferred income taxes
    130,571       99,835  
Assets held for sale
    82,122       164  
Probable insurance claims
    2,184       101,233  
Other current assets
    100,518       127,024  
   Total current assets
    1,569,267       1,068,546  
Property, plant and equipment
               
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method of accounting)
    10,216,484       8,867,639  
Other property, plant and equipment
    112,339       79,646  
      10,328,823       8,947,285  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
    (2,384,359 )     (1,776,528 )
Total property, plant and equipment, net
    7,944,464       7,170,757  
Other noncurrent assets
    556,669       568,032  
Goodwill
    760,496       781,290  
Total Assets
  $ 10,830,896     $ 9,588,625  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable - trade
  $ 780,915     $ 518,609  
Derivative instruments
    540,217       254,625  
Income taxes
    51,785       107,136  
Current installment of long-term debt
    25,000       -  
Asset retirement obligations
    13,332       68,500  
Other current liabilities
    224,494       235,392  
  Total current liabilities
    1,635,743       1,184,262  
Deferred income taxes
    1,983,833       1,758,452  
Asset retirement obligations
    130,956       127,689  
Derivative instruments
    82,803       328,875  
Other noncurrent liabilities
    337,667       274,720  
Long-term debt
    1,851,087       1,800,810  
Total Liabilities
    6,022,089       5,474,808  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
               
                 
Shareholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock - par value $1.00; 4,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
    -       -  
Common stock - par value $3.33 1/3; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 190,814,309 and 188,808,087 shares issued, respectively
    636,046       629,360  
Capital in excess of par value
    2,105,895       2,041,048  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (284,185 )     (140,509 )
Treasury stock, at cost: 18,580,865 and 16,574,384 shares, respectively
    (612,976 )     (511,443 )
Retained earnings
    2,964,027       2,095,361  
Total Shareholders’ Equity
    4,808,807       4,113,817  
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 10,830,896     $ 9,588,625  
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
               
 

 
Noble Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
                   
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Revenues
                 
Oil and gas sales
  $ 2,966,099     $ 2,701,241     $ 1,966,422  
Income from equity method investees
    210,928       139,362       90,812  
Other revenues
    95,003       99,479       129,489  
Total Revenues
    3,272,030       2,940,082       2,186,723  
                         
Costs and Expenses
                       
Lease operating costs
    322,452       317,087       217,860  
Production and ad valorem taxes
    113,547       108,979       78,703  
Transportation expense
    51,699       28,542       16,764  
Exploration expense
    219,082       167,924       178,426  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    727,981       622,608       390,544  
General and administrative
    206,378       164,541       100,125  
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations
    8,125       10,797       11,214  
Interest, net of amount capitalized
    112,957       117,045       87,541  
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments
    (2,520 )     392,367       32,680  
Gain on sale of assets
    (11,854 )     (219,577 )     (4,201 )
Loss on involuntary conversion
    51,406       -       1,000  
Other expense, net
    105,210       133,552       107,407  
Total Costs and Expenses
    1,904,463       1,843,865       1,218,063  
                         
Income Before Taxes
    1,367,567       1,096,217       968,660  
Income Tax Provision
    423,697       417,789       322,940  
Net Income
  $ 943,870     $ 678,428     $ 645,720  
                         
Earnings Per Share
                       
Basic
  $ 5.52     $ 3.86     $ 4.20  
Diluted
  $ 5.45     $ 3.79     $ 4.12  
                         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
                       
Basic
    171,078       175,707       153,773  
Diluted
    173,344       179,044       156,759  
                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
                 


 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
(in thousands)
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
                 
Net income
  $ 943,870     $ 678,428     $ 645,720  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation, depletion and amortization - oil and gas production
    727,981       622,608       390,544  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization - electricity generation
    14,277       16,319       16,476  
Dry hole expense
    90,210       70,325       98,015  
Impairment of operating assets
    3,661       8,525       5,368  
Amortization of unproved leasehold costs
    16,013       18,923       17,855  
Stock-based compensation expense
    26,825       11,816       3,467  
Gain on sale of assets
    (11,854 )     (219,577 )     (4,201 )
Deferred income taxes
    291,881       194,261       183,770  
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations
    8,125       10,797       11,214  
Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts
    15,272       15,891       5,551  
Income from equity method investees
    (210,928 )     (139,362 )     (90,812 )
Dividends from equity method investees
    226,634       37,350       59,625  
Deferred compensation expense
    33,526       15,936       14,980  
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative instruments
    (184,944 )     415,298       32,680  
Loss on involuntary conversion
    51,406       -       1,000  
Other
    (1,733 )     21,509       (40,421 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:
         
Increase in accounts receivable
    (21,609 )     (32,348 )     (73,940 )
Decrease (increase) in other current assets
    8,048       (4,954 )     (28,254 )
Decrease (increase) in probable insurance claims
    108,075       139,590       (25,306 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    19,278       (11,151 )     20,747  
Decrease in other current liabilities
    (137,441 )     (139,878 )     (4,200 )
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
    2,016,573       1,730,306       1,239,878  
                         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
                       
Additions to property, plant and equipment
    (1,414,515 )     (1,357,039 )     (785,610 )
Acquisition of U.S. Exploration, net of cash acquired
    -       (412,257 )     -  
Acquisiton of Patina, net of cash acquired
    -       -       (1,111,099 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
    9,326       519,567       13,179  
Investments in equity method investees
    -       (3,768 )     (13,927 )
Distributions from equity method investees
    2,100       155,158       4,969  
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
    (1,403,089 )     (1,098,339 )     (1,892,488 )
                         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
                       
Exercise of stock options
    24,636       62,613       67,657  
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards
    20,072       26,106       -  
Cash dividends paid
    (75,204 )     (48,924 )     (23,655 )
Purchase of treasury stock
    (101,533 )     (398,675 )     -  
Proceeds from credit facilities
    280,000       480,000       3,335,333  
Repayment of credit facilities
    (255,000 )     (605,000 )     (2,140,333 )
Repayment of term loans
    -       (105,000 )     (45,000 )
Repayment of Patina debt
    -       -       (610,865 )
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
    (107,029 )     (588,880 )     583,137  
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    506,455       43,087       (69,473 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    153,408       110,321       179,794  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 659,863     $ 153,408     $ 110,321  
                         
                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
 
 

 
Noble Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
(in thousands)
 
                             
         
Deferred
 
Accumulated
             
     
Capital in
 
Compensation
 
Other
 
Treasury
     
Total
 
 
Common
 
Excess of
 
- Restricted
 
Comprehensive
 
Stock
 
Retained
 
Shareholders'
 
 
Stock
 
Par Value
 
Stock
 
Loss
 
at Cost
 
Earnings
 
Equity
 
December 31, 2004
$ 417,152   $ 291,458   $ (1,671 ) $ (14,787 ) $ (75,956 ) $ 843,792   $ 1,459,988  
Net income
  -     -     -     -     -     645,720     645,720  
Patina Merger
  185,568     1,576,799     -     -     (73,203 )   -     1,689,164  
Exercise of stock options
  13,013     54,644     -     -     -     -     67,657  
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options
-     15,407     -     -     -     -     15,407  
Restricted stock awards, net
  578     6,506     (7,084 )   -     -     -     -  
Amortization of restricted stock
  -     -     3,467     -     -     -     3,467  
Cash dividends ($0.15 per share)
  -     -     -     -     -     (23,655 )   (23,655 )
Rabbi trust shares sold
  -     90     -     -     683     -     773  
Other
  -     335     -     -     -     -     335  
Oil and gas cash flow hedges:
                                         
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
  -     -     -     154,500     -     -     154,500  
Unrealized amounts reclassified into earnings
-     -     -     33,638     -     -     33,638  
Unrealized change in fair value
-     -     -     (945,033 )   -     -     (945,033 )
Net change in other
  -     -     -     (11,817 )   -     -     (11,817 )
Other comprehensive loss
                    (768,712 )                  
December 31, 2005
  616,311     1,945,239     (5,288 )   (783,499 )   (148,476 )   1,465,857     3,090,144  
                                           
Net income
  -     -     -     -     -     678,428     678,428  
Adoption of SFAS 123(R), net of tax
  -     (5,288 )   5,288     -     -     -     -  
Stock-based compensation expense
  -     11,816     -     -     -     -     11,816  
Exercise of stock options
  12,829     49,784     -     -     -     -     62,613  
Tax benefits related to  exercise of stock options
-     26,106     -     -     -     -     26,106  
Restricted stock awards, net
  220     (220 )   -     -     -     -     -  
Cash dividends ($0.275 per share)
  -     -     -     -     -     (48,924 )   (48,924 )
Purchase of treasury stock
  -     -     -     -     (398,675 )   -     (398,675 )
Rabbi trust shares sold
  -     13,611     -     -     35,708     -     49,319  
Oil and gas cash flow hedges:
                                       
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
  -     -     -     145,035     -     -     145,035  
Unrealized amounts reclassified into earnings
  -     -     -     264,520     -     -     264,520  
Unrealized change in fair value
  -     -     -     249,974     -     -     249,974  
Net change in other
  -     -     -     16,862     -     -     16,862  
Other comprehensive income
                    676,391                    
Adoption of SFAS 158, net of tax
  -     -     -     (33,401 )   -     -     (33,401 )
December 31, 2006
  629,360     2,041,048     -     (140,509 )   (511,443 )   2,095,361     4,113,817  
                                           
Net income
  -     -     -     -     -     943,870     943,870  
Stock-based compensation expense
  -     26,825     -     -     -     -     26,825  
Exercise of stock options
  4,930     19,706     -     -     -     -     24,636  
Tax benefits related to exercise of stock options
  -     20,072     -     -     -     -     20,072  
Restricted stock awards, net
  1,756     (1,756 )   -     -     -     -     -  
Cash dividends ($0.435 per share)
  -     -     -     -     -     (75,204 )   (75,204 )
Purchase of treasury stock
  -     -     -     -     (101,533 )   -     (101,533 )
Oil and gas cash flow hedges:
                                       
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
-     -     -     33,761     -     -     33,761  
Unrealized change in fair value
  -     -     -     (184,254 )   -     -     (184,254 )
Net change in other
  -     -     -     6,817     -     -     6,817  
Other comprehensive loss
                    (143,676 )                  
December 31, 2007
$ 636,046   $ 2,105,895   $ -   $ (284,185 ) $ (612,976 ) $ 2,964,027   $ 4,808,807  
                                           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
                   
 
 

 
Noble Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
(in thousands)
 
                   
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Net income
  $ 943,870     $ 678,428     $ 645,720  
Other items of comprehensive income (loss)
                       
Oil and gas cash flow hedges:
                       
  Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
    54,105       232,428       237,692  
    Less tax provision
    (20,344 )     (87,393 )     (83,192 )
  Unrealized amounts reclassified into earnings
    -       423,910       51,750  
    Less tax provision
    -       (159,390 )     (18,112 )
  Unrealized change in fair value
    (295,279 )     351,637       (1,453,897 )
    Less tax provision
    111,025       (101,663 )     508,864  
Interest rate cash flow hedges:
                       
  Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
    758       758       757  
    Less tax provision
    (285 )     (121 )     (265 )
  Unrealized change in fair value
    (1,203 )     -       -  
    Less tax provision
    452       -       -  
Net change in other
    11,369       25,002       (18,937 )
    Less tax provision
    (4,274 )     (8,777 )     6,628  
Other comprehensive income (loss)
    (143,676 )     676,391       (768,712 )
                         
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 800,194     $ 1,354,819     $ (122,992 )
                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
                 

 

 

 



 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(Dollar amounts in tables, unless otherwise indicated, are in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Note 1—Nature of Operations
 
Noble Energy, Inc. (“Noble Energy”, “we” or “us”) is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and marketing of crude oil and natural gas. We have exploration, exploitation and production operations domestically and internationally. We operate throughout major basins in the US including Colorado’s Wattenberg field and Piceance basin, the Mid-continent area of western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, the San Juan basin in New Mexico, the Gulf Coast and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. In addition, we conduct business internationally in China, Ecuador, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, West Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon) and in other areas. In 2005, we merged with Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (“Patina”) and in 2006 we acquired U.S. Exploration Holdings, Inc. (“U.S. Exploration”).
 
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation— Accounting policies used by us and our subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the US. Significant policies are discussed below. Our consolidated accounts include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We use the equity method of accounting for investments in entities that we do not control but over which we exert significant influence. We carry equity method investments at our share of net assets of the equity investees plus our loans and advances. Differences in the basis of the investment and the separate net asset value of the investee, if any, are amortized into income over the remaining useful life of the underlying assets. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
 
Use of Estimates —The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the US (GAAP) requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
 
Estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves are the most significant of our estimates. All of the reserve data in this Form 10-K are estimates. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, reserve estimates may be different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. Engineers in our Houston, Denver and London offices prepare all reserve estimates for our different geographical regions. These reserve estimates are reviewed and approved by senior engineering staff and division management with final approval by the Director of Asset Development and certain members of senior management. See Supplemental Oil and Gas Information.
 
Other items subject to estimates and assumptions include the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment and goodwill, asset retirement obligations, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred income tax assets, valuation of derivative instruments, and obligations related to employee benefits. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
 
Foreign Currency— The US dollar is considered the functional currency for each of our international operations. Transactions that are completed in foreign currencies are remeasured into US dollars and recorded in the financial statements at prevailing foreign exchange rates. Transaction gains or losses were not material in any of the periods presented and are included in other expense, net on the statements of operations.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts— We routinely assess the recoverability of all material trade and other receivables to determine their collectibility. We accrue a reserve on a receivable when, based on management’s judgment, it is probable that a receivable will not be collected and the amount of such reserve may be reasonably estimated. Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:
 


   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 34,535     $ 18,644     $ 13,093  
Charged to expense
    14,183       19,404       14,688  
Deductions and other
    1,089       (3,513 )     (9,137 )
Balance at end of period
  $ 49,807     $ 34,535     $ 18,644  
 
Amounts charged to expense include $14 million in 2007, $15 million in 2006 and $11 million in 2005 to cover potentially uncollectible balances related to Ecuador power operations. These amounts are included in electricity generation expense. Certain entities purchasing electricity in Ecuador have been slow to pay amounts due us. We are pursuing various strategies to protect our interests including international arbitration and litigation. The allowance was also increased by $2 million in 2006 and $1 million in 2005 to record various provisions related to our US business. In addition, in 2005 the allowance was decreased due to the final write-off of certain allowances recorded in prior years ($6 million).
 
Materials and Supplies Inventories— Materials and supplies inventories, consisting principally of tubular goods and production equipment, are stated at the lower of cost or market.
 
Property, Plant and Equipment—
 
Successful Efforts Method We account for crude oil and natural gas properties under the successful efforts method of accounting. Under this method, costs to acquire mineral interests in crude oil and natural gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves and to drill and equip development wells are capitalized. Capitalized costs of producing crude oil and natural gas properties are amortized to operations by the unit-of-production method based on proved crude oil and natural gas reserves on a property-by-property basis as estimated by our engineers. Upon sale or retirement of depreciable or depletable property, the cost and related accumulated DD&A are eliminated from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
 
Proved Property Impairment In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review proved oil and gas properties and other long-lived assets for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of the carrying value of such properties, such as a downward revision of the reserve estimates or sustained decrease in commodity prices. We estimate the future cash flows expected in connection with the properties and compare such future cash flows to the carrying amount of the properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. When the carrying amounts of the properties exceed their estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount of the properties is reduced to their estimated fair value. The factors used to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity prices and operating expenses, timing of future production, future capital expenditures and a risk-adjusted discount rate. We recorded impairments of approximately $4 million in 2007, $9 million in 2006 and $5 million in 2005, primarily related to downward reserve revisions on US properties and/or adjustment of the carrying value of properties to their fair values.
 
Unproved Property Impairment We also periodically assess individually significant unproved properties for impairment of value and recognize a loss at the time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Cash flows used in the impairment analysis are determined based on management’s estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves, future commodity prices and future costs to extract the reserves. Cash flow estimates related to probable and possible reserves are reduced by additional risk-weighting factors. Other individually insignificant unproved properties are amortized on a composite method based on our experience of successful drilling and average holding period. We recorded impairments of individually significant unproved properties of approximately $3 million in 2007, $1 million in 2006, and $3 million in 2005 and included the amounts in exploration expense.
 
Properties Acquired in Business Combinations In determining the fair values of proved and unproved properties acquired in business combinations, we prepare estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves. We estimate future prices to apply to the estimated reserve quantities acquired, and estimate future operating and development costs, to arrive at estimates of future net cash flows. For the fair value assigned to proved reserves, the future net cash flows are discounted using a market-based weighted average cost of capital rate determined appropriate at the time of the business combination. To compensate for the inherent risk of estimating and valuing unproved reserves, the discounted future net cash flows of probable and possible reserves are reduced by additional risk-weighting factors.
 

 
 
Exploration Costs Geological and geophysical costs, delay rentals, amortization of unproved leasehold costs, and costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves are expensed as oil and gas exploration. We carry the costs of an exploratory well as an asset if the well finds a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its capitalization as a producing well and as long as we are making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. For certain capital-intensive deepwater Gulf of Mexico or international projects, it may take us more than one year to evaluate the future potential of the exploration well and make a determination of its economic viability. Our ability to move forward on a project may be dependent on gaining access to transportation or processing facilities or obtaining permits and government or partner approval, the timing of which is beyond our control. In such cases, exploratory well costs remain suspended as long as we are actively pursuing access to necessary facilities and access to such permits and approvals and believe they will be obtained. We assess the status of suspended exploratory well costs on a quarterly basis. See Note 5 Capitalized Exploratory Well Costs.
 
Other Property Other property includes autos, trucks, airplane, office furniture and computer equipment and other fixed assets. These items are recorded at cost and are depreciated on the straight-line method based on expected lives of the individual assets or group of assets, which range from three to seven years.
 

 

 
Balance Sheet Information— Additional balance sheet information is as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Other Current Assets
           
Derivative instruments
  $ 15,058     $ 35,242  
Materials and supplies inventories
    60,479       46,973  
Prepaid expenses and other
    24,981       44,809  
Total
  $ 100,518     $ 127,024  
Other Noncurrent Assets
               
Equity method investments
  $ 357,129     $ 373,372  
Mutual fund investments
    123,779       116,314  
Probable insurance claims
    37,475       46,500  
Derivative instruments
    4,829       2,862  
Other assets
    33,457       28,984  
Total
  $ 556,669     $ 568,032  
Other Current Liabilities
               
Accrued and other current liabilities
  $ 206,435     $ 219,885  
Interest payable
    18,059       15,507  
Total
  $ 224,494     $ 235,392  
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
               
Deferred compensation liabilities
  $ 225,098     $ 173,253  
Accrued benefit costs
    50,972       58,491  
Other noncurrent liabilities
    61,597       42,976  
Total
  $ 337,667     $ 274,720  
 
Statement of Operations Information— Other revenues and other expense, net consist of the following:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Other Revenues
                 
Electricity sales
  $ 70,916     $ 71,603     $ 74,228  
Gathering, marketing and processing
    24,087       27,876       55,261  
Total
  $ 95,003     $ 99,479     $ 129,489  
Other Expense, net
                       
Electricity generation (1)
  $ 56,552     $ 59,494     $ 53,137  
Gathering, marketing and processing
    17,539       18,664       28,067  
Deferred compensation expense
    33,526       15,936       14,980  
Impairment of operating assets
    3,661       8,525       5,368  
Other
    (6,068 )     30,933       5,855  
Total
  $ 105,210     $ 133,552     $ 107,407  
 
 (1)
See Allowance for Doubtful Accounts above.

 

 
Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information— Additional cash flow information is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
      (in thousands)  
Cash paid during the year for:
                 
Interest (net of amount capitalized)
  $ 104,910     $ 105,769     $ 83,860  
Income taxes paid, net
    149,058       115,398       121,687  
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
                       
Issuance of notes for property interests
    50,000       -       -  
Issuance of common stock and options and liabilities assumed in Patina Merger
    -       -       3,783,306  
 
Goodwill— Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We account for goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). Goodwill is not amortized to earnings but is tested annually during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. No goodwill impairment was indicated as of December 31, 2007. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 781,290     $ 862,868  
Goodwill associated with acquisitions
    (15,091 )     27,711  
Goodwill associated with sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties
    -       (100,000 )
Tax benefits on stock options exercised
    (5,703 )     (9,289 )
Balance at end of period
  $ 760,496     $ 781,290  
 
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Abstract Issue No. 00-23,  “Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44”, we reduce the amount of goodwill originally recorded for deferred tax assets associated with the exercise of fully-vested stock options assumed in conjunction with the Patina Merger to the extent that the stock-based compensation expense reported for tax purposes does not exceed the fair value of the awards recognized as part of the total purchase price.
 
Income Taxes— Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized when items of income and expense are recognized in the financial statements in different periods than when recognized in the tax return. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when income items are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are available to offset tax payments due in future years. Deferred tax liabilities arise when income items are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when expenses are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date when the change in the tax rate was passed.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments— The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values for each class of financial instruments. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between two willing parties.
 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature or maturity of the instruments.
 
Mutual Funds The fair value is based on published market prices.
 

 
 
Debt The fair value of debt is estimated based on the published market prices for the same or similar issues.  The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of debt instruments are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
2007
2006
 
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
Carrying Amount
Fair Value
 
(in thousands)
Total debt, net of discount
 $        1,876,087
 $        1,919,990
 $        1,800,810
 $        1,852,890
 
See Note 7 Debt.
 
Derivative Instruments The fair value estimates for commodity fixed price swaps, basis swaps and costless collars use published market prices for the underlying commodities and discount rates to determine discounted expected future cash flows as of the date of the estimate. See Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Capitalization of Interest— We capitalize interest costs associated with the development and construction of significant properties or projects to bring them to a condition and location necessary for their intended use, which for crude oil and natural gas assets is at first production from the field. Interest is capitalized using an interest rate equivalent to the average rate we pay on long-term debt, including the credit facility and bonds. Capitalized interest is included in the cost of oil and gas assets and amortized with other costs on a unit-of-production basis. Capitalized interest totaled $17 million in 2007, $13 million in 2006 and $9 million in 2005.
 
Statement of Cash Flows— For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand and investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less.
 
Basic  and Diluted Earnings Per Share— Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) of common stock have been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The diluted EPS of common stock includes the effect of outstanding common stock equivalents. The calculation of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
Income
   
Shares
   
Income
   
Shares
   
Income
   
Shares
 
   
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 943,870       171,078     $ 678,428       175,707     $ 645,720       153,773  
Basic EPS
  $ 5.52             $ 3.86             $ 4.20          
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 943,870       171,078     $ 678,428       175,707     $ 645,720       153,773  
Effect of dilutive stock options  and restricted stock awards
    -       2,266       -       3,337       -       2,986  
Adjusted net income and shares
  $ 943,870       173,344     $ 678,428       179,044     $ 645,720       156,759  
Diluted EPS
  $ 5.45             $ 3.79             $ 4.12          
 
Options, restricted stock and shares of our common stock held in a rabbi trust excluded from the EPS calculation above as they were antidilutive are as follows:
 
 
 
 
Weighted Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
 
Awards and Shares
 
Exercise Price
 
 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
         
Stock options
        1,014
  $
52.41
 
Noble Energy common stock  held  in rabbi trust and shares of restricted stock
        1,102
   
           -
 
Total excluded from diluted EPS calculation
        2,116
       
Year Ended December 31, 2006
         
Stock options
           675
  $
45.19
 
  Noble Energy common stock held in rabbi trust and shares of restricted stock
        1,276
   
           -
 
Total excluded from diluted EPS calculation
        1,951
       
Year Ended December 31, 2005
         
Stock options
             48
  $
41.47
 
Noble Energy common stock held in rabbi trust
        1,360
   
           -
 
Total excluded from diluted EPS calculation
        1,408
       

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We also adopted FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No.48” (“FSP FIN 48-1”) as of January 1, 2007. FSP FIN 48-1 provides that a company’s tax position will be considered settled if the taxing authority has completed its examination, the company does not plan to appeal, and it is remote that the taxing authority would reexamine the tax position in the future. The adoption of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 had no effect on our financial position or results of operations. See Note 8—Income Taxes.
 
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation —Through December 31, 2005, we accounted for stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and related Interpretations. As of January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) revised SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and nullified APB 25 and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123(R) requires companies to measure the grant-date fair value of stock options and other stock-based compensation issued to employees and expense the fair value over the requisite service period of the award. SFAS 123(R) became effective for interim or annual periods beginning January 1, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, prior period amounts have not been restated. See Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation.
 
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans —In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans to recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in the statement of financial position, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end statement of financial position, and provide additional disclosures. We adopted SFAS 158 as of December 31, 2006, and the effect of adoption on our financial condition at December 31, 2006 was included in our consolidated balance sheets. Adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. See Note 11—Benefit Plans.
 
Adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 —In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 expresses the SEC staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. The SEC staff believes registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material.  SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending on or after November 15, 2006. We adopted SAB 108 as of December 31, 2006. Adoption of SAB 108 had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.
 

 
 
Treasury Stock —We record treasury stock purchases at cost, which includes incremental direct transaction costs.   Amounts are recorded as reductions in shareholders’ equity.
 
Revenue Recognition and Imbalances —We record revenues from the sales of crude oil and natural gas when the product is delivered at a fixed or determinable price, title has transferred and collectibility is reasonably assured.
 
When we have an interest with other producers in properties from which natural gas is produced, we use the entitlements method to account for any imbalances. Imbalances occur when we sell more or less product than we are entitled to under our ownership percentage. Revenue is recognized only on the entitlement percentage of volumes sold. Any amount that we sell in excess of our entitlement is treated as a liability and is not recognized as revenue. Any amount of entitlement in excess of the amount we sell is recognized as revenue and a receivable is accrued. We record the noncurrent portion of the liability in other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities, and the current portion of the liability in other current liabilities. We record the noncurrent portion of the receivable in other assets and the current portion of the receivable in other current assets. Imbalance liabilities were $10 million and $17 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Imbalance receivables were $13 million and $18 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
Revenues derived from electricity generation are recognized when power is transmitted or delivered, the price is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
 
We also engage in the purchase and sale of third-party crude oil and natural gas. We record third-party sales, net of cost of goods sold, as gathering, marketing and processing revenues when the product is delivered or the contract is net settled at a fixed or determinable price, title has transferred and collectibility is reasonably assured.
 
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities —We use various derivative instruments in connection with anticipated crude oil and natural gas sales to minimize the impact of commodity price fluctuations. Such instruments include variable to fixed NYMEX price swaps, costless collars and variable to fixed price basis swaps. We account for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended,” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 established accounting and reporting standards requiring every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value. SFAS 133 requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Under cash flow hedge accounting, gains and losses are reflected in shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCL”) until the forecasted transaction occurs. The derivative’s gains and losses are then offset against related results on the hedged transaction on the statements of operations. Gains and losses from derivative instruments related to crude oil and natural gas sales and which qualify for hedge accounting treatment are recorded in oil and gas sales in the consolidated statements of operations upon sale of the associated commodity.
 
SFAS 133 also requires that a company formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. Only derivative instruments that are expected to be highly effective in offsetting anticipated gains or losses on the hedged cash flows and that are subsequently documented to have been highly effective can qualify for hedge accounting. Effectiveness must be assessed both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis. Any ineffectiveness in hedging instruments whereby gains or losses do not exactly offset anticipated gains or losses of hedged cash flows is measured and recognized in earnings in the period in which it occurs. We assess hedge effectiveness quarterly based on total changes in the derivative’s fair value and using regression analysis. A hedge is considered effective if certain statistical tests are met. We record hedge ineffectiveness in loss on derivative instruments. See Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Through December 31, 2007, we elected to designate the majority of our crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments as cash flow hedges. Effective January 1, 2008, we discontinued cash flow hedge accounting on all existing commodity derivative instruments. We voluntarily made this change to provide greater flexibility in our use of derivative instruments. From January 1, 2008 forward, we will recognize all gains and losses on such instruments in earnings in the period in which they occur. Net derivative losses that were deferred in AOCL as of December 31, 2007, will be reclassified to earnings in future periods as the original hedged transactions affect earnings. The discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting for commodity derivative instruments did not affect our net assets or cash flows at December 31, 2007 and does not require adjustments to our previously reported financial statements.
 

 
 
Related Party Transaction— We entered into a consulting agreement with a former officer of Patina who now serves as a member of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the Board member served as a consultant to the combined company for a period of 12 months following the merger (May 16, 2005) in exchange for a monthly retainer of $50,000. We paid total consulting fees of $225,806 during 2006 and $374,194 during 2005. We also reimbursed his office space rent of $72,000 in 2006 and $45,000 in 2005.
 
Contingencies— We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for losses associated with legal claims when such losses are considered probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated.
 
We self-insure the medical and dental coverage provided to certain employees, certain workers’ compensation and the first $1 million of general liability coverage. Liabilities are accrued for self-insured claims, or when estimated losses exceed coverage limits, and when sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate the amount of the loss.
 
Electricity Generation—Ecuador Integrated Power Project— Through our subsidiaries, EDC Ecuador Ltd. and MachalaPower Cia. Ltda., we have a 100% ownership interest in an integrated natural gas-to-power project. The project includes the Amistad natural gas field, offshore Ecuador, which supplies natural gas to fuel the Machala power plant located in Machala, Ecuador. The revenues attributable to the natural gas-to-power project are included in other revenues and the expenses (including DD&A) are included in other expense, net.
 
Concentration of Market Risk— During 2007, Marathon Petroleum Supply Company (“Marathon”) was the largest single non-affiliated purchaser of production and accounted for 18% of crude oil sales, or 10% of total oil and gas sales. During 2006, Trafigura Beheer B.V. was the largest single non-affiliated purchaser of production and accounted for 28% of crude oil sales, or 15% of total oil and gas sales. Shell Trading (US) Company accounted for 18% of 2006 crude oil sales or 10% of 2006 total oil and gas sales. During 2005, Glencore Energy U.K., Ltd. was the largest single non-affiliated purchaser of production and accounted for 24% of crude oil sales, or 11% of total oil and gas sales. We believe the loss of any one purchaser would not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operation since there are numerous potential purchasers of our production.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk— Certain of our financial instruments, including cash equivalents, trade receivables and derivative instruments, may expose us to credit risk.  Substantially all of our cash at December 31, 2007 is located in our foreign subsidiaries. The cash is denominated in US dollars and in invested in highly liquid, investment-grade securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Although our cash and cash equivalents are deposited with major international banks and financial institutions, concentrations of cash in certain foreign locations may increase credit risk. We monitor the creditworthiness of the banks and financial institutions with which we invest and review the securities underlying our investment accounts. We believe that losses from nonperformance are unlikely to occur; however, we are not able to predict sudden changes in creditworthiness.

Our trade receivables result primarily from sales of crude oil and natural gas production and joint interest billings to our partners. The trade receivables reflect a broad national and international customer base, which limits our exposure to concentrations of credit risk.  The majority of these receivables have payment terms of 30 days or less, and we continually monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties. 

We use crude oil and gas derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of commodity price fluctuations and these derivative instruments expose us to counterparty credit risk. Our counterparties are major banks or financial institutions. We engage in master netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk with counterparties as these agreements permit the amounts owed to others to be offset against amounts due us. We monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties and believe that losses from nonperformance are unlikely to occur. However, we are not able to predict sudden changes in counterparties’ creditworthiness.
 
Reclassification— Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2007 presentation. These reclassifications are not material to the financial statements.
 

 

 
Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures
 
Sale of Argentina In December 2007, we entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina for a sales price of $117.5 million, effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008. The Argentina assets had a net book value of $82 million at December 31, 2007 and are classified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. The Argentina operations, financial position and cash flows are not material and have not been reflected as discontinued operations.
 
Sale of Gulf of Mexico Shelf Properties —In 2006, we completed the sale of our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. The sale included essentially all of our properties in the Gulf of Mexico shelf except for our interest in the Main Pass area, which we have retained. Pretax cash proceeds from the sale totaled $506 million including proceeds received from parties who exercised preferential rights to purchase certain minor properties. We recorded a pretax gain of $211 million from the sale. The net book value of properties sold totaled $229 million. Asset retirement obligations of $45 million, related to the Gulf of Mexico shelf properties, were also included in the sale. In accordance with SFAS 142, we allocated $100 million of our US reporting unit goodwill to the sale. The property disposition did not qualify for accounting as discontinued operations, in accordance with EITF 03-13, “Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations”. This is due to the migration of our investment and operations to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico which we believe is an area of higher potential.
 
As a result of the sale, we recognized a pretax charge of $399 million related to cash flow hedge losses which were reclassified from AOCL to earnings. This reclassification reflected the mark-to-market value of the cash flow hedges that related to Gulf of Mexico shelf production. See Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Purchase of U.S. Exploration Holdings, Inc. —In 2006, we purchased the common stock of U.S. Exploration, a privately held corporation, for a cash purchase price of $412 million plus liabilities assumed. U.S. Exploration’s reserves and production are located in Colorado’s Wattenberg field. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values at the acquisition date as follows:
 
 
·
$413 million to proved oil and gas properties;
 
·
$131 million to unproved oil and gas properties;
 
·
$34 million to goodwill; and
 
·
$172 million to deferred income taxes.
 
Patina Merger— In 2005, we completed the Patina Merger. Patina was an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, development and exploitation of crude oil and natural gas properties within the continental US. Patina’s properties and oil and gas reserves are located principally in relatively long-lived fields with established production histories. The properties are concentrated primarily in the Wattenberg field of Colorado’s D-J basin, the Mid-continent area of western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, and the San Juan basin in New Mexico. We acquired the common stock of Patina for a total purchase price of approximately $4.9 billion, which was comprised primarily of cash and our common stock, plus liabilities assumed. In exchange for Patina’s common stock and stock options held by Patina’s employees, we issued 55.7 million shares of stock valued at $1.7 billion, issued options valued at $105 million, paid $1.1 billion in cash to Patina shareholders and assumed debt of $611 million and deferred taxes of $1.1 billion. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values at the merger date as follows:
 
 
·
$2.6 billion to proved oil and gas properties;
 
·
$1.1 billion to unproved oil and gas properties;
 
·
$875 million to goodwill; and
 
·
$1.1 billion to deferred income taxes.
 
The following pro forma condensed combined financial information for the year ended December 31, 2005 was derived from our historical financial statements and those of Patina and gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2005. The financial information has been included for comparative purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the merger taken place as of the dates indicated and is not intended to be a projection of future results.
 

 

 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2005
   
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Revenues
  $
2,434,677
 
Net income
   
               693,091
 
Earnings per share:
       
Basic
  $
4.03
 
Diluted
   
                     3.98
 
         
 
Note 4—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes
 
We have completed our cleanup activities relating to damage to the Main Pass assets caused by Hurricane Ivan in 2004 and Katrina in 2005.  During third quarter 2007, we completed the lifting and removal of the four platform decks that were sheared from their supporting structures during the hurricanes. During the first half of 2007, several factors contributed to an increase in our estimated cleanup costs for damage related to Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina.  These factors included cost escalation due to weather delays and an increase in effort for the design and construction of the deck lifting barge and mooring system, as well as additional costs for the actual deck lifting activities.  These increases caused the total project costs, combined with net book value of the assets destroyed, to exceed certain insurance coverage limitations.  As a result, we recorded $51 million as a loss on involuntary conversion during 2007.
 
Through December 31, 2007, we received $310 million of insurance recoveries related to damage caused by Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina. As of December 31, 2007, we recorded probable insurance claims of $40 million. We are currently assessing the scope and timing of our redevelopment of the Main Pass properties. Ultimate recovery of our insurance claim is associated with redevelopment or possible settlement resolution with our insurance providers.
 
Insurance reimbursements received to date have been for cleanup and repair costs and are included in cash flows from operating activities.
 

 

 

 
Note 5—Capitalized Exploratory Well Costs
 
We capitalize exploratory well costs until a determination is made that the well has found proved reserves or is deemed noncommercial, in which case the well costs are immediately charged to exploration expense.
 
Changes in capitalized exploratory well costs are as follows and exclude amounts that were capitalized and subsequently expensed in the same period:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Capitalized exploratory well costs, beginning of period
  $ 80,359     $ 35,228     $ 62,724  
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending determination of proved reserves
    182,271       62,580       33,671  
Reclassified to property, plant and equipment based on determination of proved reserves
    (7,143 )     (16,762 )     (52,138 )
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense
    (6,454 )     (687 )     (9,029 )
Capitalized exploratory well costs, end of period
  $ 249,033     $ 80,359     $ 35,228  
 
The following table provides an aging of capitalized exploratory well costs (suspended well costs) based on the date the drilling was completed and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of drilling:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period of one year or less
  $ 187,101     $ 58,493     $ 35,228  
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a  period greater than one year after completion of drilling
    61,932       21,866       -  
Balance at end of period
  $ 249,033     $ 80,359     $ 35,228  
                         
Number of projects that have exploratory well costs that have been  capitalized for a period greater than one year after completion of drilling
    6       4       -  
 
The following table provides a further aging of those exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of drilling as of December 31, 2007:
 
         
Suspended Since
 
   
Total
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Project:
                 
Raton South (Deepwater Gulf of Mexico)
  $ 23,374     $ 23,374     $ -  
Redrock (Deepwater Gulf of Mexico)
    17,133       17,133       -  
Blocks O and I (West Africa)
    19,039       -       19,039  
Other
    2,386       2,386       -  
Total capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized  for a period greater than one year after completion of drilling
  $ 61,932     $ 42,893     $ 19,039  
 
Exploratory well costs capitalized for more than one year at December 31, 2007 included six projects, two of which included activity in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.  One project relates to Raton South (Mississippi Canyon Block 292) and includes approximately $23 million of suspended exploratory well costs. We are currently evaluating a possible sidetrack-appraisal well to be drilled during late 2008 or 2009.  The other project relates to Redrock (Mississippi Canyon 248) and includes approximately $17 million of suspended exploratory well costs. Redrock is currently considered a co-development candidate to a successful sidetrack-appraisal well at Raton South.
 

 

 
We also incurred exploratory well costs for projects, Block O and Block I, in West Africa. These exploratory well costs totaled approximately $19 million. Since drilling the initial well for the project, additional seismic work has been completed and appraisal wells have been drilled to further evaluate this discovery. In 2008, the West Africa development team will proceed with a program to further define the resources in this area such that an optimal development program may be designed. In addition to the amount of exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year for the Block O and Block I projects, we incurred $137 million related to the six successful wells drilled in West Africa during 2007.
 
The remaining two projects, which total approximately $2 million, continue to be evaluated by various means including additional seismic work, drilling additional wells and evaluating the potential of the exploration wells.
 
Note 6—Asset Retirement Obligations
 
Asset retirement obligations consist of estimated costs of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation and similar activities associated with our oil and gas properties. An asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost are recorded when an asset is first constructed or purchased. The asset retirement cost is determined and discounted to present value using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. After initial recording the liability is increased for the passage of time, with the increase being reflected as accretion expense in the statement of operations. Subsequent adjustments in the cost estimate are reflected in the liability and the amounts continue to be amortized over the useful life of the related long-lived asset.
 
Changes in asset retirement obligations are as follows:
 
    Year Ended December 31, 2007
   
(in thousands)
 
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of period
  $ 196,189  
Liabilities incurred in current period
    8,927  
Liabilities settled in current period
    (176,961 )
Revisions
    108,008  
Accretion expense
    8,125  
Asset retirement obligations, end of period
  $ 144,288  
         
Current portion
  $ 13,332  
Noncurrent portion
    130,956  
 
Approximately $125 million of liabilities settled and $64 million of revisions related to hurricane damage to the Gulf of Mexico Main Pass assets. The remainder of the liabilities settled and revisions resulted primarily from changes in estimated timing of actual abandonment and overall cost increases for Gulf of Mexico assets. See Note 4—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
 

 
 
Note 7—Debt
 
Our debt consists of the following:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
Debt
   
Interest Rate
   
Debt
   
Interest Rate
 
   
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
$2.1 billion Credit Facility
  $ 1,180,000       5.28     $ 1,155,000       5.69  
5 ¼% Senior Notes, due April 2014
    200,000       5.25       200,000       5.25  
7 ¼% Notes, due October 2023
    100,000       7.25       100,000       7.25  
8% Senior Notes, due April 2027
    250,000       8.00       250,000       8.00  
7 ¼% Senior Debentures, due August 2097
    100,000       7.25       100,000       7.25  
Installment payments, due May 2009
    25,000       5.53       -       -  
Long-term debt
    1,855,000               1,805,000          
Installment payments - current portion
    25,000       5.53       -       -  
Total debt
    1,880,000               1,805,000          
Unamortized discount
    (3,913 )             (4,190 )        
Total debt, net of discount
  $ 1,876,087             $ 1,800,810          
 
All of our long-term debt is senior unsecured debt and is, therefore, pari passu with respect to the payment of both principal and interest. The indenture documents of each of the 7¼% Notes, the 8% Senior Notes and the 7¼% Senior Debentures provide that we may prepay the instruments by creating a defeasance trust. The defeasance provisions require that the trust be funded with securities sufficient, in the opinion of a nationally recognized accounting firm, to pay all scheduled principal and interest due under the respective agreements. Interest on each of these issues is payable semi-annually.
 
Credit Facility— In November 2007, we extended our bank revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) until December 9, 2012.  The commitment is $2.1 billion until December 9, 2011 at which time the commitment reduces to $1.8 billion. The Credit Facility (i) provides for Credit Facility fee rates that range from 5 basis points to 15 basis points per year depending upon our credit rating, (ii) makes available short-term  loans up to an aggregate amount of $300 million and (iii) provides for interest rates that are based upon the Eurodollar rate plus a margin that ranges from 20 basis points to 70 basis points depending upon our credit rating and utilization of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility requires that our total debt to capitalization ratio (as defined in the credit agreement), expressed as a percentage, not exceed 60% at any time. A violation of this covenant could result in a default under the Credit Facility, which would permit the participating banks to restrict our ability to access the Credit Facility and require the immediate repayment of any outstanding advances under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is with certain commercial lending institutions and is available for general corporate purposes.
 
Certain lenders that are a party to the Credit Facility have in the past performed investment banking, financial advisory, lending or commercial banking services for us, for which they have received customary compensation and reimbursement of expenses. Debt issuance costs of approximately $3 million remain and are being amortized to expense over the life of the Credit Facility.
 
The Credit Facility does not restrict the payment of dividends on our common stock, except, if after giving effect thereto, an Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or been caused thereby.
 
Installment Payments Due —During 2007, we purchased working interests in oil and gas properties in the Piceance basin of western Colorado for $75 million. After making a cash payment of $25 million at closing, we owe $50 million in the form of installment payments to the seller. Installments of $25 million each are due on May 12, 2008 and May 11, 2009.  The amount due in 2008 is included in short-term borrowings and the amount due in 2009 is included in long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. Interest on the unpaid amounts is due quarterly. Interest accrues at a LIBOR rate plus .30%. The interest rate was 5.53% at December 31, 2007.
 
Debt Repayments— During 2006, we prepaid the $105 million balance remaining on certain term loans due 2009. The interest rates on the term loans were based on a Eurodollar rate plus a margin of between 60 to 130 basis points depending upon our credit rating. Interest was payable periodically based on the tenor of the underlying Eurodollar rate selected at the time of a rate reset.
 
 

 
 
Annual Maturities— Annual maturities of outstanding debt are as follows:
   
(in thousands)
 
2008
  $ 25,000  
2009
    25,000  
2010
    -  
2011
    -  
2012
    1,180,000  
Thereafter
    650,000  
Total
  $ 1,880,000  
 
Short-Term Borrowings —Our credit agreement is supplemented by short-term borrowings under various uncommitted credit lines used for working capital purposes. Uncommitted credit lines may be offered by certain banks from time to time at rates negotiated at the time of borrowing. Other than the installment payments discussed above, no short-term borrowings were outstanding at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
 
Note 8—Income Taxes
 
Components of income before income taxes are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Domestic
  $ 480,200     $ 402,111     $ 426,756  
Foreign
    887,367       694,106       541,904  
Total
  $ 1,367,567     $ 1,096,217     $ 968,660  
 
The income tax provision consists of the following:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Current taxes:
                 
Federal
  $ 6,409     $ 79,680     $ 48,293  
State
    506       5,577       -  
Foreign
    124,901       138,271       90,877  
Total current
    131,816       223,528       139,170  
                         
Deferred taxes:
                       
Federal
    185,503       144,143       119,953  
State
    6,283       4,641       14,073  
Foreign
    100,095       45,477       49,744  
Total deferred
    291,881       194,261       183,770  
Total income tax provision
  $ 423,697     $ 417,789     $ 322,940  
 
A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:
 

 
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(amounts in percentages)
 
Federal statutory rate
    35.0       35.0       35.0  
Effect of:
                       
Earnings of equity method investees
    (5.4 )     (4.2 )     (3.2 )
State taxes, net of federal benefit
    0.5       1.3       1.3  
Difference between US and foreign rates
    1.6       2.2       3.5  
Nondeductible goodwill
    -       3.1       -  
AJCA repatriation benefit
    -       -       (3.7 )
Other, net
    (0.7 )     0.7       0.4  
Effective rate
    31.0       38.1       33.3  
 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted from the following:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Deferred tax assets:
           
Loss carryforwards
  $ 20,571     $ 90,387  
Accrued expenses
    26,227       34,083  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    3,566       2,917  
Fair value of derivative contracts
    176,750       185,667  
Postretirement benefits
    10,233       14,578  
Deferred compensation
    60,993       55,880  
Foreign tax credits
    82,037       63,707  
Other
    14,037       3,577  
Total deferred tax assets
    394,414       450,796  
Valuation allowance - foreign losses
    (18,174 )     (9,876 )
Valuation allowance - foreign tax credits
    (56,619 )     (63,708 )
Net deferred tax assets
    319,621       377,212  
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Property, plant and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation, amortization, lease impairment and abandonments
    (2,183,950 )     (2,034,877 )
Other
    11,067       (952 )
Total deferred tax liability
    (2,172,883 )     (2,035,829 )
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (1,853,262 )   $ (1,658,617 )
 
Net deferred tax liabilities were classified in the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Deferred income tax asset
  $ 130,571     $ 99,835  
Deferred income tax liability
    (1,983,833 )     (1,758,452 )
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (1,853,262 )   $ (1,658,617 )
 
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.
 

 

 
We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, we believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of these deductible differences at December 31, 2007. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced in the future if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
 
We have recognized deferred tax assets associated with foreign loss carryforwards. The tax effect of these carryforwards decreased from $90 million in 2006 to $18 million in 2007. These losses were incurred on our projects in Suriname and other new venture activities which are not yet commercial. Therefore, a valuation allowance  was provided against the full amount of the deferred tax asset. In 2006, we incurred a large taxable loss in the UK from accelerated write-offs allowed on our Dumbarton field development. No valuation allowance was provided against this loss carryforward, and it was fully utilized in 2007. Starting in 2005, we were able to claim a foreign tax credit for US federal income tax purposes and expect to be in a credit position for the next several years. Therefore, we have recorded a deferred tax asset for certain foreign taxes paid in 2005 and 2006 that cannot be claimed as a credit in those years because of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. A valuation allowance of $11 million has been provided against this deferred tax asset. We have also recorded a deferred tax asset of $71 million for the future foreign tax credits associated with deferred tax liabilities recorded by foreign branch operations. A valuation allowance of $46 million has been provided against this deferred tax asset.
 
Several factors resulted in a decrease in our effective tax rate for 2007. The major factor was that, in 2006, $100 million of goodwill write-off associated with the sale of the Gulf of Mexico shelf properties was not deductible, which increased the rate for that year. Other factors were an increase in deferred tax assets arising from foreign tax credits, a decrease in the Chinese tax rate, and the realization of additional income from equity method investees which is a favorable permanent difference in calculating the income tax expense.
 
The American Jobs Creation Act (“AJCA”), enacted in 2004, created a temporary incentive for US corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing for an 85% dividends-received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. In July 2005, we completed an evaluation of the effects of the repatriation provision, and our Board of Directors approved a plan to repatriate $118 million in earnings of our methanol subsidiary during the third quarter 2005. Because we had provided US tax on most of the methanol subsidiary’s earnings at 35% through December 31, 2004, repatriation under the Act resulted in a net tax benefit of $35 million recorded in the third quarter 2005.
 
We have not recorded US deferred income taxes on the remaining   undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the accumulated undistributed earnings of the consolidated foreign subsidiaries were approximately $902 million. Upon distribution of these earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would likely be subject to US income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. It is not practicable, however, to estimate the amount of taxes that may be payable on the eventual remittance of these earnings because of the possible application of US foreign tax credits. Although we are currently claiming foreign tax credits, we may not be in a credit position when any future remittance of foreign earnings takes place, or the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and IRS Regulations may not allow the credits to be utilized during the applicable carryback and carryforward periods.
 
During 2007, China’s legislature, the National People’s Congress, enacted the China Corporate Income Tax Law.  This new legislation will decrease our tax rate in China from 33% to 25% starting in 2008.  The deferred tax liability for China as of December 31, 2006 was revised during 2007 to reflect the new rate, which decreased deferred tax expense by $2 million.
 
Adoption of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 —As discussed in Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies, we adopted FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 as of January 1, 2007. The adoption had no effect on our financial position or results of operations. As of January 1, 2007, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $400,000, all of which would affect our effective tax rate if recognized. There was no change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits through December 31, 2007. We do not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease during the next 12 months.
 
In our major tax jurisdictions, the earliest years remaining open to examination are as follows: US – 2004, Equatorial Guinea – 2006, China – 2006, Israel – 2000, UK – 2006 and the Netherlands – 2005.
 

 

 
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits which have been claimed on tax returns in income tax expense. We did not accrue interest or penalties at December 31, 2007, because the jurisdiction in which we have unrecognized tax benefits does not currently impose interest on underpayments of tax, and we believe that we are below the minimum statutory threshold for imposition of penalties.
 
Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation
 
As discussed in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions for stock-based awards granted to employees using the modified prospective application method provided by SFAS 123(R). Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. SFAS 123(R) requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other stock-based compensation issued to employees and was effective for interim or annual periods beginning January 1, 2006. We recognize the expense of all stock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award).
 
We recognized total stock-based compensation expense as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Stock-based compensation expense included in:
                 
General and administrative expense
  $ 25,136     $ 10,720     $ 4,008  
Exploration expense and other
    1,689       1,096       -  
Total stock-based compensation expense
  $ 26,825     $ 11,816     $ 4,008  
Tax benefit recognized
  $ 10,086     $ 4,443     $ 1,403  
 
Pro Forma Information The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) to stock-based employee compensation in all periods presented. The actual and pro forma net income and earnings per share for 2007 and 2006 below are the same since we adopted SFAS 123(R) as of January 1, 2006. The 2007 and 2006 amounts are presented for comparison to the prior year.
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(actual)
   
(actual)
   
(pro forma)
 
               
(unaudited)
 
   
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Net income, as reported
  $ 943,870     $ 678,428     $ 645,720  
Add: Stock-based compensation cost recognized, net of tax
    16,739       7,373       2,605  
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax
    (16,739 )     (7,373 )     (6,150 )
Pro forma net income
  $ 943,870     $ 678,428     $ 642,175  
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic - as reported
  $ 5.52     $ 3.86     $ 4.20  
Basic - pro forma
    5.52       3.86       4.18  
Diluted - as reported
    5.45       3.79       4.12  
Diluted - pro forma
    5.45       3.79       4.10  
 
Total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards for 2005 has been recalculated using revised expected term assumptions. The impact on pro forma earnings and pro forma earnings per share was not significant.
 
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans and Incentive Plan Our stock option and restricted stock plans (the “Plans”) and incentive plan are described below.
 

 

 
1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
 
Under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as amended (the “1992 Plan”), the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) may grant stock options and award restricted stock to our officers or other employees and those of our subsidiaries. During 2007, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 1992 Plan that increased the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued from 18,500,000 to 22,000,000 shares. At December 31, 2007, 11,229,753 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance, including 6,063,665 shares available for future grants and awards, under the 1992 Plan.
 
1992 Plan Stock Options —Stock options are issued with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant, and are subject to such other terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee. Unless granted by the Committee for a shorter term, the options expire ten years from the grant date. Option grants generally vest ratably over a three-year period.
 
1992 Plan Restricted Stock —Restricted stock awards made under the 1992 Plan are subject to such restrictions, terms and conditions, including forfeitures, if any, as may be determined by the Committee. Restricted Stock awards generally vest over periods of one to three years.
 
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
Under the Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2004 LTIP”), the Committee may make incentive awards to our key employees and those of our subsidiaries. Incentive compensation is based upon the attainment of specific market and performance goals established by the Committee. Awards may be in the form of stock options or restricted stock or in the form of performance units or other incentive measurements providing for the payment of bonuses in cash, or in any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. Stock options granted and restricted stock awarded under the 2004 LTIP are granted and awarded pursuant to the terms of the 1992 Plan. These awards are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) which provides for the grant-date fair value of the awards to be recognized in the income statement over the service period. Our cash based performance units are accounted for under SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and are excluded from the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
 
2005 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
 
The 2005 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “2005 Plan”) provides for grants of stock options and awards of restricted stock to our non-employee directors. The 2005 Plan superseded and replaced the 1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The total number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2005 Plan is 800,000. At December 31, 2007, 774,561 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance, including 650,306 shares available for future grants and awards under the 2005 Plan.
 
2005 Plan Stock Options —The 2005 Plan provides for the granting to a non-employee director of 11,200 stock options on the date of election to the Board of Directors, annual grants of 2,800 options per non-employee director on February 1 of each year, and discretionary grants by the Board of Directors (up to a maximum of 11,200 options per non-employee director granted in any one year). Options are issued with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant and may be exercised one year after the date of grant. The options expire ten years from the date of grant.
 
2005 Plan Restricted Stock —The 2005 Plan also provides for the granting to a non-employee director of 4,800 shares of restricted stock on the date of election to the Board of Directors, annual awards of 1,200 shares of restricted stock per non-employee director on February 1 of each year, and discretionary grants by the Board of Directors (up to a maximum of 4,800 shares of restricted stock per non-employee director awarded in any one year). Restricted stock is restricted for a period of at least one year from the date of grant.
 
1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
 
The 1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Noble Energy, Inc., as amended, (the “1988 Plan”) provided for the issuance of stock options to our non-employee directors. Options issued under the 1988 Plan may be exercised one year after grant and expire ten years from the grant date. The 1988 Plan provided for the granting of a fixed number of stock options to each non-employee director annually (10,000 stock options for the first calendar year of service and 5,000 stock options for each year thereafter) on February 1 of each year. The 1988 Plan was terminated in 2005. No options can be granted under the 1988 Plan after its termination.
 

 

 
Patina Stock Option Plans
 
Patina maintained a shareholder approved stock option plan for employees (the “Patina Employee Plan”) that provided for the issuance of options at prices not less than fair market value at the date of grant. Patina also maintained a shareholder approved stock grant and option plan for non-employee directors (the “Patina Directors’ Plan”). The Patina Directors’ Plan provided for stock options to be granted to each non-employee director upon appointment and upon annual re-election thereafter. Upon completion of the Patina Merger, all unvested stock options outstanding under the Patina Employee Plan and the Patina Directors’ Plan became fully vested, and all outstanding options were converted into options to purchase our common stock. The Patina options expire five years from the date of grant. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
 
Stock Option Grants The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The hypothetical midpoint scenario we use considers the actual exercise and post-vesting cancellation history of stock-based compensation historical trends to develop expectations for future periods. Expected volatility represents the extent to which our stock price is expected to fluctuate between the grant date and the anticipated term of the award. We use a blended ratio of the historical volatility of our common stock for a period equal to the expected term of the option and the implied volatility from exchange-traded options on our common stock. The risk-free rate is based on a weighting of five and seven year US Treasury securities as of the year ended prior to the date of grant to arrive at an approximated 5.5-year risk free rate of return. The dividend yield represents the value of our stock’s annualized dividend as compared to our stock’s average price for the three-year period ended prior to the date of grant. It is calculated by dividing one full year of our expected dividends by our average stock price over the three-year period ended prior to the date of grant. The assumptions used in valuing stock options are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(weighted averages)
 
Expected term (in years)
    5.5       5.5       5.5  
Expected volatility
    29.6 %     31.8 %     21.5 %
Risk-free rate
    4.7 %     4.7 %     4.6 %
Expected dividend yield
    0.6 %     0.8 %     0.4 %
 
Stock option activity was as follows:
 
             
Weighted
   
         
Weighted
 
Average
   
         
Average
 
Remaining
 
Aggregate
         
Exercise
 
Contractual
 
Intrinsic
   
Options
   
Price
 
Term
 
Value
         
(per share)
 
(in years)
 
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    6,211,750     $ 24.24        
Granted
    1,557,919       53.79        
Exercised
    (1,479,040 )     16.66        
Forfeited/Canceled
    (115,568 )     49.21        
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    6,175,061     $ 32.98  
                 5.5
 
 $      287,768
Exercisable at December 31, 2007
    4,083,097     $ 24.29  
                 3.8
 
 $      225,499
 
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted was $18.77 in 2007, $16.09 in 2006 and $12.17 in 2005. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $68 million in 2007, $118 million in 2006 and $78 million in 2005.
 
As of December 31, 2007, $23 million of compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the Plans remained to be recognized. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. We issue new shares of common stock to settle option exercises. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options.
 

 

 
Restricted Stock Awards Awards of time-vested restricted stock are valued at the price of our common stock at the date of award. The fair values of market-based restricted stock awards are estimated on the date of award using a Monte Carlo valuation model that uses the assumptions in the following table. The Monte Carlo model is based on random projections of stock price paths and must be repeated numerous times to achieve a probabilistic assessment. Expected volatility represents the extent to which our stock price is expected to fluctuate between now and the award’s anticipated term. We use the historical volatility of our common stock for the three-year period ended prior to the date of award. The risk-free rate is based on a three-year period from US Treasury securities as of the year ended prior to the date of award.  The assumptions used in valuing the market based restricted stock awards are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2006
   
2005
 
Number of simulations
    100,000       100,000  
Expected volatility
    28.4 %     29.6 %
Risk-free rate
    4.4 %     3.3 %
 
Restricted stock activity was as follows:
 
   
Shares
   
Weighted
   
Shares
   
Weighted
 
   
Subject to
   
Average
   
Subject to
   
Average
 
   
Service
   
Grant Date
   
Market
   
Grant Date
 
   
Conditions
   
Fair Value
   
Conditions
   
Fair Value
 
         
(per share)
         
(per share)
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    73,095     $ 35.85       204,250     $ 29.27  
Granted
    547,818       53.92       -       -  
Vested
    (37,475 )     42.99       (75,325 )     22.23  
Forfeited
    (15,848 )     53.42       (4,788 )     40.51  
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    567,590     $ 52.33       124,137     $ 33.11  
 
The total fair value of restricted stock that vested was $6 million in 2007 and $2 million in 2006.
 
As of December 31, 2007, $20 million of compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awarded under the Plans remained to be recognized. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of two years. Common stock dividends accrue on restricted stock grants and are paid upon vesting. We issue new shares of common stock when awarding restricted stock.
 
Note 10—Additional Shareholders’ Equity Information
 
Activity in shares of our common stock and treasury stock was as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
Common stock shares issued
           
Shares at beginning of period
    188,808,087       184,893,510  
Exercise of common stock options
    1,479,040       3,848,521  
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures
    527,182       66,056  
Shares at end of period
    190,814,309       188,808,087  
Treasury stock
               
Shares at beginning of period
    16,574,384       9,268,932  
Shares repurchased
    2,006,481       8,373,400  
Rabbi trust shares sold
    -       (1,067,948 )
Shares at end of period
    18,580,865       16,574,384  
 

 

 
During 2007, we completed a $500 million common stock repurchase program begun in 2006.
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet included:
 
   
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
   
Oil and Gas Cash Flow Hedges
   
Interest Rate Lock Cash Flow Hedges
   
Minimum Pension Liability and Other
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2004
  $ (6,939 )   $ (4,577 )   $ (3,271 )   $ (14,787 )
Cash flow hedges
                               
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
    154,500       492       -       154,992  
Unrealized amounts reclassified into earnings
    33,638       -       -       33,638  
Unrealized change in fair value
    (945,033 )     -       -       (945,033 )
Net change in minimum pension liability and other
    -       -       (12,309 )     (12,309 )
December 31, 2005
    (763,834 )     (4,085 )     (15,580 )     (783,499 )
Cash flow hedges
                               
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
    145,035       637       -       145,672  
Unrealized amounts reclassified into earnings
    264,520       -       -       264,520  
Unrealized change in fair value
    249,974       -       -       249,974  
Net change in minimum pension liability and other
    -       -       16,225       16,225  
Adoption of SFAS 158
    -       -       (33,401 )     (33,401 )
December 31, 2006
    (104,305 )     (3,448 )     (32,756 )     (140,509 )
Cash flow hedges
                               
Realized amounts reclassified into earnings
    33,761       473       2,000       36,234  
Unrealized change in fair value
    (184,254 )     (751 )             (185,005 )
Net change in  other
    -       -       5,095       5,095  
December 31, 2007
  $ (254,798 )   $ (3,726 )   $ (25,661 )   $ (284,185 )
 
The effective income tax rate applied to AOCL increased from 35% at December 31, 2005 to 37.6% at December 31, 2006 and remained 37.6% at December 31, 2007.
 
Note 11— Benefit Plans
 
Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans— We have a noncontributory, tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan covering employees who were hired prior to May 1, 2006.  The benefits are based on an employee’s years of service and average earnings for the 60 consecutive calendar months of highest compensation. Our funding policy has been to make annual contributions equal to at least the minimum required contribution, but no greater than the maximum deductible for federal income tax purposes. We also have an unfunded, nonqualified restoration plan that provides the pension plan formula benefits that cannot be provided by the qualified pension plan because of pay deferrals and the compensation and benefit limitations imposed on the pension plan by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We sponsor other plans for the benefit of our employees and retirees, which include medical and life insurance benefits. We use a December 31 measurement date for the plans.
 
Former Patina employees began participation in the pension plan and the restoration plan on January 1, 2006, with vesting service from their original Patina hire date and credited service for benefit accruals starting January 1, 2006. Additionally, all former Patina employees were covered under the medical and life insurance plans effective January 1, 2006.
 
On December 31, 2006, we adopted SFAS 158, which required us to recognize the funded status (the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation) of our defined benefit pension, restoration and other postretirement benefit plans in the consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to AOCL, net of tax. The adjustment to AOCL at adoption represented the unrecognized net actuarial loss, unrecognized prior service cost, and unrecognized net transition obligation remaining from the initial adoption of SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”. These amounts are currently being recognized as net periodic benefit cost pursuant to our historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in periods subsequent to adoption and are not recognized as net periodic benefit cost in the same periods are recognized as a component of AOCL. The adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, for any prior period presented, or for any periods subsequent to adoption.

 
 
Changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets of the pension, restoration and other postretirement benefit plans are as follows at December 31:
 
 
   
Retirement and Restoration Plan
   
Medical and Life Plan
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Change in benefit obligation
                       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
  $ 175,154     $ 168,301     $ 22,373     $ 27,223  
Service cost
    11,671       11,781       1,962       2,207  
Interest cost
    9,978       9,550       1,191       1,377  
Plan participants' contributions
    -       -       332       272  
Amendments
    7,836       (8,327 )     -       (5,711 )
Benefits paid
    (6,513 )     (6,169 )     (830 )     (795 )
Actuarial (gain) loss
    (10,633 )     18       (2,640 )     (2,200 )
Benefit obligation at end of year
    187,493       175,154       22,388       22,373  
Change in plan assets
                               
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
    136,890       94,832       -       -  
Actual return on plan assets
    12,982       12,593       -       -  
Employer contributions
    11,395       35,634       498       523  
Plan participants' contributions
    -       -       332       272  
Benefits paid
    (6,513 )     (6,169 )     (830 )     (795 )
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
    154,754       136,890       -       -  
Funded status
                               
Funded status at end of year
    (32,739 )     (38,264 )     (22,388 )     (22,373 )
Net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheets (after adoption of  FAS 158)
    (32,739 )     (38,264 )     (22,388 )     (22,373 )
Amounts recognized in consolidated   balance sheets consist of:
                               
Current liabilities
    (2,958 )     (1,205 )     (1,197 )     (941 )
Noncurrent liabilities
    (29,781 )     (37,059 )     (21,191 )     (21,432 )
Net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheets (after adoption of  FAS 158)
    (32,739 )     (38,264 )     (22,388 )     (22,373 )
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic   benefit cost and included in AOCL
                               
Transition obligation
    (614 )     (854 )     -       -  
Prior service (cost) credit
    (2,981 )     5,372       5,746       6,672  
Accumulated loss
    (34,051 )     (49,978 )     (13,691 )     (17,384 )
AOCL
    (37,646 )     (45,460 )     (7,945 )     (10,712 )
Cumulative employer contributions in excess  of net periodic benefit cost
    4,907       7,196       (14,443 )     (11,661 )
Net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheet (after adoption of  FAS 158)
  $ (32,739 )     (38,264 )   $ (22,388 )     (22,373 )
Change in AOCL due to adoption of FAS 158
                               
Additional minimum liability (before FAS 158)
            (2,708 )             -  
Intangible asset (before FAS 158)
            65               -  
AOCL (before FAS 158)
            (2,643 )             -  
Net increase in AOCL
          $ (42,817 )           $ (10,712 )
 
 
 

 
 
Net periodic benefit cost recognized for the pension, restoration and other postretirement benefit plans is provided in the table below.
 
 
Retirement and Restoration Plan
 
Medical and Life Plan
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2007
 
2006
   
2005
 
2007
 
2006
 
2005
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost
                         
Service cost
$ 11,671   $ 11,781     $ 6,372   $ 1,962   $ 2,207   $ 963  
Interest cost
  9,978     9,550       7,807     1,191     1,377     943  
Expected return on plan assets
  (11,045 )   (9,320 )     (7,094 )   -     -     -  
Amortization of transition obligation
  240     239       24     -     -     -  
Amortization of prior  service (credit) cost
  (516 )   (220 )     398     (925 )   (439 )   (236 )
Amortization of net loss
  3,354     2,912       1,034     1,053     1,170     760  
Net periodic benefit cost
$ 13,682   $ 14,942     $ 8,541   $ 3,281   $ 4,315   $ 2,430  
Other changes recognized in AOCL
                                     
Prior service cost arising during period
$ 7,836     *       *   $ -       *     *  
Net gain arising during period
  (12,571 )   *       *     (2,639 )     *     *  
Amortization of transition obligation
  (240 )   *       *     -       *     *  
Amortization of prior service credit
  516     *       *     925       *     *  
Amortization of net loss
  (3,354 )   *       *     (1,053 )     *     *  
Total recognized in  AOCL
$ (7,813 )   *       *   $ (2,767 )     *     *  
Expected amortizations for next fiscal year
                                     
Amortization of transition obligation
  240     240       *     -     -     *  
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
  191     (516 )     *     (925 )   (925 )   *  
Amortization of net loss
  1,668     3,221       *     854     1,211     *  
                                       
Additional Information
                                     
Increase in minimum liability included in AOCL
  *     *     $ 21,638     *     *     -  
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
                                     
Discount rate
  6.50 %   5.75 %     5.50 %   6.25 %   5.75 %   5.50 %
Rate of compensation increase
  5.00 %   5.00 %     5.00 %   -     -     -  
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs
                                     
Discount rate (1)
  5.75 %   5.50% / 6.25 %     6.00 %   5.75 %   5.50% / 6.25 %   5.75 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
  8.25 %   8.25 %     8.25 %   -     -     -  
Rate of compensation increase
  5.00 %   5.00 %     4.00 %   -     -     -  
*Not applicable due to change in method of accounting for defined benefit and other post retirement plans.
 
(1)  The net periodic benefit cost was remeasured at May 1, 2006 using a discount rate of 6.25%, due to changes in plan provisions.
 
 
 
Additional disclosures are as follows:
 
   
Retirement and Restoration Plan
 
   
2007
     
2006
 
      (in thousands)  
Accumulated benefit obligation
  $ 162,595       $ 142,136  
Information for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
                 
Projected benefit obligation
  $ 187,493       $ 175,154  
Fair value of plan assets
    154,754         136,890  
Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
                 
Accumulated benefit obligation
  $ 25,131       $ 20,542  
Fair value of plan assets
    -         -  
 
In selecting the assumption for expected long-term rate of return on assets, we consider the average rate of earnings expected on the funds to be invested to provide for plan benefits. This includes considering the plan’s asset allocation, historical returns on these types of assets, the current economic environment and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the plan. We assume the long-term asset mix will be consistent with a target asset allocation of 70% equity and 30% fixed income, with a range of plus or minus 10% acceptable degree of variation in the plan’s asset allocation. Based on these factors we expect pension assets will earn an average of 8.25% per annum over the life of the plan. No plan assets are expected to be returned to us during 2008.
 
In order to determine an appropriate discount rate at December 31, 2007, we performed an analysis of the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve (the “CPDC”) as of that date for each of our plans. The CPDC uses spot rates that represent the equivalent yield on high quality, zero coupon bonds for specific maturities. We used these rates to develop an equivalent single discount rate based on our plans’ expected future benefit payment streams and duration of plan liabilities. A 1% increase in the discount rate would have resulted in a decrease in net periodic benefit cost of $4 million in 2007. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would have resulted in an increase in net periodic benefit cost of $5 million in 2007.
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates were as follows at December 31:
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
   
9%
     
10%
 
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate)
    5%      
5%
 
Year rate reaches ultimate trend rate
 
2012
   
2012
 
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
   
1% Increase
   
1% Decrease
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Effect on total service and interest cost components for 2007
  $ 390     $ (341 )
Effect on year-end 2007 postretirement benefit obligation
    2,270       (2,025 )
 

 
 
Weighted-average asset allocations for the tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan are as follows:
 
   
Target
             
   
Allocation
   
Plan Assets
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2006
 
Asset Category
                 
Equity Securities
    70 %     70 %     70 %
Fixed income
    30 %     30 %     28 %
Other
    -       -       2 %
Total
    100 %     100 %     100 %
 
The investment policy for the tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan is determined by an employee benefits committee (“the committee”) with input from a third-party investment consultant. Based on a review of historical rates of return achieved by equity and fixed income investments in various combinations over multi-year holding periods and an evaluation of the probabilities of achieving acceptable real rates of return, the committee has determined the target asset allocation deemed most appropriate to meet the immediate and future benefit payment requirements for the plan and to provide a diversification strategy which reduces market and interest rate risk. A 1% increase (decrease) in the expected return on plan assets would have resulted in a (decrease) increase, respectively, in net periodic benefit cost of $1 million in 2007.
 
We base our determination of the asset return component of pension expense on a market-related valuation of assets, which reduces year-to-year volatility. This market-related valuation recognizes investment gains or losses over a five-year period from the year in which they occur. Investment gains or losses for this purpose are the difference between the expected return calculated using the market-related value of assets and the actual return based on the fair value of assets. Since the market-related value of assets recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period, the future value of assets will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded. As of January 1, 2007, we had cumulative asset gains of approximately $3 million, which remain to be recognized in the calculation of the market-related value of assets.
 
Contributions— As a result of previous contributions made to the pension plan, there are no required contributions expected during 2008. We may, however, make additional contributions to our pension plan as determined by the committee. We expect to make cash contributions of approximately $4 million to the unfunded restoration and medical and life plans during 2008. This amount equals expected  benefit payments from those plans. (unaudited).
 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments— As of December 31, 2007, the following future benefit payments are expected to be paid:
 
   
Retirement and Restoration Plan
 
Medical and Life Plan
   
(in thousands)
2008
 $
 25,049
    $
1,197
 
2009
 
    12,000
     
    1,370
 
2010
 
    13,586
     
    1,499
 
2011
 
    16,722
     
    1,914
 
2012
 
    18,507
     
    2,198
 
Years 2013 to 2017
 
    99,516
     
  14,280
 
 
The estimate of expected future benefit payments is based on the same assumptions used to measure the benefit obligation at December 31, 2007 and includes estimated future employee service.
 
401(k) Plan— We sponsor a 401(k) savings plan. All regular employees are eligible to participate. We make contributions to match employee contributions up to the first 6% of compensation deferred into the plan, and certain profit sharing contributions for employees hired on or after May 1, 2006, based upon their ages and salaries. We made cash contributions of $6 million in 2007, $4 million in 2006 and $5 million in 2005.
 
 

 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan— In connection with the Patina Merger, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities related to a Patina shareholder-approved non-qualified deferred compensation plan. This plan was  available to officers and certain managers of Patina and allowed participants to defer all or a portion of their salary and annual bonuses (either in cash or common stock). Participant-directed investments are held in a rabbi trust and are available to satisfy the claims of our creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency. Participants may elect to receive distributions in either cash or shares of our common stock. We account for the deferred compensation plan in accordance with EITF 97-14, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested.” Components of the rabbi trust are as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Rabbi trust assets
           
Mutual fund investments
  $ 106,581     $ 100,767  
Noble Energy common stock (at market value)
    87,554       54,027  
Total rabbi trust assets
    194,135       154,794  
Liability under Patina deferred compensation plan
  $ 194,135     $ 154,794  
Number of shares of Noble Energy common stock held by rabbi trust
    1,101,032       1,101,032  
 
Assets of the rabbi trust, other than our common stock, are invested in certain mutual funds that cover an investment spectrum ranging from equities to money market instruments. These mutual funds have published market prices and are reported at market value. We account for these investments in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The mutual funds are included in the mutual funds account in other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Shares of our common stock held by the rabbi trust are accounted for as treasury stock in the shareholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts payable to the plan participants are included in other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and include the market value of the shares of our common stock. One million shares, or 91%, of the common stock held in the plan at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were attributable to a member of our Board of Directors. Plan participants sold no shares of common stock during 2007, 1,067,948 shares during 2006 and 20,434 shares during 2005. Proceeds were invested in mutual funds. Distributions to Plan participants totaled $2 million in 2007, $0.5 million in 2006 and $1 million in 2005.
 
In accordance with EITF 97-14, all fluctuations in market value of the deferred compensation liability have been reflected in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The market value of the liability increased $41 million in 2007, $28 million in 2006 and $18 million in 2005. The increases in the liability included the appreciation in the market value of our common stock of $34 million in 2007, $16 million in 2006 and $15 million in 2005. The increases in the liability also included the appreciation in the market value of the rabbi trust mutual fund investments of $7 million in 2007, $12 million in 2006 and $3 million in 2005. Net deferred compensation expense totaled $34 million, $16 million and $15 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Cash Flow Hedges —We use various derivative instruments in connection with anticipated crude oil and natural gas sales to mitigate the variability of cash flows associated with commodity price fluctuations. Such instruments include variable to fixed price swaps, costless collars and basis swaps. While these instruments mitigate the cash flow risk of future reductions in commodity prices they may also curtail benefits from future increases in commodity prices. We account for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS 133 and elected to designate the majority of our commodity derivative instruments as cash flow hedges through December 31, 2007. As discussed in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, we voluntarily discontinued cash flow hedge accounting for our commodity derivative instruments, effective January 1, 2008.
 
 

 
 
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments includes the following:

   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Ineffectiveness (gains) losses
  $ (2,520 )   $ 9,502     $ 930  
Reclassified from AOCL
    -       423,910       51,750  
Mark-to-market gain on derivative instruments  not accounted for as cash flow hedges
    -       (41,045 )     (20,000 )
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments
  $ (2,520 )   $ 392,367     $ 32,680  
 
If it becomes probable that the hedging instrument is no longer highly effective, the hedging instrument loses hedge accounting treatment. All current mark-to-market gains and losses are recorded in earnings and all accumulated gains or losses recorded in AOCL related to the hedging instrument are also reclassified to earnings. During 2006, we reclassified a pretax charge of $399 million from AOCL to earnings when it became probable that forecasted crude oil and natural gas sales would not occur due to the sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. 2006 also included a mark-to-market gain of $39 million and the reclassification a pretax charge of $25 million from AOCL to earnings due to the impacts of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the timing of forecasted Gulf of Mexico production. During 2005, we recognized a mark-to-market gain of $20 million and reclassified a pretax charge of $52 million from AOCL to earnings due to the impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on forecasted Gulf of Mexico production .
 
Effects of cash flow hedges included in oil and gas sales were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
   
2007
 
2006
 
2005
   
(in thousands)
Decrease in crude oil sales
 
     (223,347)
 
      (190,730)
 
    (140,486)
Increase (decrease) in natural gas sales
 
       169,242
 
        (41,698)
 
      (97,206)
Total decrease in crude oil and natural gas sales
 $
 (54,105)
 $
 (232,428)
 $
(237,692)
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had entered into, and designated as cash flow hedges, the following variable to fixed price swap derivative instruments related to natural gas and crude oil sales as follows:
 
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
 
         
Average Price
         
Average price
 
Production Period
 
MMBtupd
   
per MMBtu
   
Bopd
   
per Bbl
 
2008 (NYMEX)
    170,000     $ 5.66       16,500     $ 38.23  
2008 (Brent)
    -       -       2,000       88.18  
2009 (NYMEX)
    -       -       7,000       86.67  
2009 (Brent)
    -       -       2,000       87.98  
 
On January 2, 2008, we entered into additional NYMEX variable to fixed price swap derivative instruments for 1,000 Bpd of crude oil at an average price per Bbl of $90.50 for 2009.
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had entered into the following basis swap derivative instruments related to natural gas sales. These basis swaps were combined with NYMEX variable to fixed swaps and designated as cash flow hedges:
 
         
Average
 
         
Differential
 
Production Period
 
MMBtupd
   
per MMBtu
 
2008 (CIG (1) vs. NYMEX)
    100,000     $ 1.66  
2008 (ANR (2) vs. NYMEX)
    40,000       1.01  
2008 (PEPL (3) vs. NYMEX)
    10,000       0.98  
                 
 
(1)       Colorado Interstate Gas – Northern System
(2)       ANR Oklahoma Pipeline
(3)       Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had entered into, and designated as cash flow hedges, the following costless collar derivative instruments related to crude oil and natural sales as follows:
 
   
Natural Gas
   
Crude Oil
 
         
Average Price
         
Average Price
 
         
per MMBtu
         
per Bbl
 
Production Period
 
MMBtupd
   
Floor
   
Ceiling
   
Bopd
   
Floor
   
Ceiling
 
                                     
2008 (NYMEX)
    -     $ -     $ -       3,100     $ 60.00     $ 72.40  
2008 (CIG)
    14,000       6.75       8.70       -       -       -  
2008 (Brent)
    -       -       -       4,074       45.00       66.52  
2009 (NYMEX)
    -       -       -       3,700       60.00       70.00  
2009 (CIG)
    15,000       6.00       9.90       -       -       -  
2009 (Brent)
    -       -       -       3,074       45.00       63.04  
2010 (NYMEX)
    -       -       -       3,500       55.00       73.80  
2010 (CIG)
    15,000       6.25       8.10       -       -       -  
 
The costless collar, fixed price swap and basis swap contracts entitle us (floating price payor) to receive settlement from the counterparty (fixed price payor) for each calculation period in amounts, if any, by which the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable for each calculation period is less than the fixed price or floor price. We would pay the counterparty if the settlement price for the scheduled trading day applicable for each calculation period is more than the fixed price or ceiling price. The amount payable by us, if the floating price is above the fixed or ceiling price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess, if any, of the floating price over the fixed or ceiling price in respect of each calculation period. The amount payable by the counterparty, if the floating price is below the fixed or floor price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess, if any, of the fixed or floor price over the floating price in respect of each calculation period.
 
AOCL —As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the balance in AOCL included net deferred losses of $255 million and $104 million, respectively, related to the fair value of crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges. The net deferred losses are net of deferred income tax benefits of $153 million and $63 million, respectively. Approximately $206 million of these deferred losses, net of tax, will be reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months as the forecasted transactions occur, and will be recorded as a reduction in oil and gas sales of approximately $331 million before tax. All forecasted transactions currently being hedged are expected to occur by December 2010.
 
Other Derivative Instruments —In addition to the derivative instruments described above, we may employ derivative instruments in connection with purchases and sales of production in order to establish a fixed margin and mitigate the risk of price volatility. Most of the purchases are on an index basis. However, purchasers in the markets in which we sell often require fixed or NYMEX-related pricing. We may use a derivative instrument to convert the fixed or NYMEX sale to an index basis thereby determining the margin and minimizing the risk of price volatility.
 

 

 
Receivables/Payables Related to Crude Oil and Natural Gas Derivative Instruments —The fair values of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments
           
Current asset
  $ 15,058     $ 35,242  
Long-term asset
    4,829       2,862  
Current liability
    (540,217 )     (254,625 )
Long-term liability
    (82,803 )     (328,875 )
 
Interest Rate Lock— We occasionally enter into forward contracts or swap agreements to hedge exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of interest rate swaps or interest rate “locks” used as cash flow hedges are reported in AOCL, to the extent the hedge is effective, until the forecasted transaction occurs, at which time they are recorded as adjustments to interest expense over the term of the related notes. At December 31, 2007, AOCL included a deferred loss of $4 million, net of tax, related to interest rate swaps. $3 million of this amount is being reclassified into earnings, at the rate of $0.8 million per year, as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of our 5¼% senior notes due 2014. The remaining $1 million deferred loss relates to two $500 million notional amount interest rate locks based on five and ten year US Treasury rates of 3.55% and 4.15% respectively. The locks expire in September 2008.
 
Note 13—Equity Method Investments
 
Investments accounted for under the equity method consist primarily of the following:
 
 
·
45% interest in Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC (“AMPCO”), which owns and operates a methanol plant and related facilities in Equatorial Guinea; and
 
·
28% interest in Alba Plant LLC (“Alba Plant”), which owns and operates a liquefied petroleum gas processing plant in Equatorial Guinea.
 
Construction of the Alba Plant was funded primarily through advances by us and other owners in exchange for notes payable by the Alba Plant. The notes were scheduled to mature on December 31, 2011 and bore interest at the 90-day LIBOR rate plus 3%. The notes were repaid in 2006.
 
Equity method investments are included in other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of earnings is reported as income from equity method investees in the consolidated statements of operations. Our share of income taxes incurred directly by the equity method investees is reported in income from equity method investments and is not included in our income tax provision in our consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2007, our retained earnings included $151 million related to the undistributed earnings of equity method investees.
 
The carrying value of our equity method investments is $29 million higher than the underlying net assets of the investees. A portion of the basis difference is being amortized into income over the remaining useful lives of the underlying net assets and the remainder is being recovered through distributions.
 
Equity method investments are as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Equity method investments
           
AMPCO
  $ 199,605     $ 211,325  
Alba Plant
    142,540       146,051  
Other
    14,984       15,996  
Total equity method investments
  $ 357,129     $ 373,372  
 
 
 
Summarized, 100% combined financial information for equity method investees is as follows:
 
           
December 31,
 
           
2007
   
2006
 
           
(in thousands)
 
Balance sheet information
                   
Current assets
   
 
    $ 408,000     $ 252,201  
Noncurrent assets
   
 
      813,601       857,465  
Current liabilities
   
 
      273,164       171,028  
Noncurrent liabilities
            31,278       2,385  
         
     
Year Ended December 31,
 
     
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
     
(in thousands)
 
Statements of operations information
                       
Operating revenues
    $ 934,419     $ 702,556     $ 464,000  
Less cost of goods sold
      220,101       202,304       136,508  
Gross margin
      714,318       500,252       327,492  
Less other expense
      36,486       47,487       35,798  
Less income tax expense
      44,150       23,451       67,142  
Net income
    $ 633,682     $ 429,314     $ 224,552  
 
Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings— We are among a group of eighteen defendants named in a lawsuit filed August 23, 2002 by Dore Energy Corporation under Docket Number 10-16202 in the 38th Judicial District Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  The lawsuit alleges damage to property owned by Dore resulting from oil and gas activities dating to the 1930’s.  Our predecessor, Samedan Oil Corporation, operated on a portion of the property from 1989 to 1999.  Dore has delivered documents alleging approximately $140 million in damages.  Trial is currently set for April 14, 2008. We intend to vigorously defend against these allegations and believe that our share of damages, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
 
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”) issued a notice of violation to Equinox Oil Company on September 25, 2001 alleging violation of air emission and permitting regulations for a facility known as the Zif Gas Plant located near Clay City, Illinois.  On January 17, 2007, the IEPA re-issued written notices of these alleged violations in the name of Equinox’s successors in interest, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Elysium Energy, LLC and Noble Energy Production, Inc. On March 16, 2007, the IEPA accepted our compliance commitment agreement wherein we agreed to pay a delayed permit fee, install an incineration/caustic scrubber emissions control system at the site, and fund a supplemental environmental project (“SEP”) in the nearby community.  At this time, we expect no additional monies to be expended other than these amounts for which we have fully accrued.  As of December 31, 2007, this matter has been concluded.
 
We are involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings are subject to the uncertainties inherent in any litigation. We are defending ourselves vigorously in all such matters and we do not believe that the ultimate disposition of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Non-Cancelable Leases and Other Commitments— We   hold leases and other commitments for drilling rigs, buildings, equipment and other properties. Rental expense for office buildings and oil and gas operations equipment was approximately $13 million in 2007, $12 million in 2006 and $10 million in 2005.
 
 

 
 
Minimum commitments as of December 31, 2007 consist of the following:
                               
   
Drilling and
                         
   
Equipment,
         
Office
   
Oil and Gas
       
   
and Purchase
   
Throughput
   
Buildings and
   
Operations
       
   
Obligations
   
Agreement
   
Facilities
   
Equipment
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
2008
  $ 443,926     $ -     $ 7,289     $ 5,467     $ 456,682  
2009
    94,444       19,000       7,426       4,448       125,318  
2010
    79,491       19,000       7,069       2,159       107,719  
2011
    65,715       19,000       6,736       -       91,451  
2012
    41,772       19,000       6,511       -       67,283  
2013 and thereafter
    -       19,000       17,863       -       36,863  
Total
  $ 725,348     $ 95,000     $ 52,894     $ 12,074     $ 885,316  
 
Note 15—Segment Information
 
We have operations throughout the world and manage our operations by country. The following information is grouped into five components that are all primarily in the business of natural gas and crude oil exploration and production: the United States; West Africa; the North Sea; Israel; and Other International, Corporate and Marketing. Other International includes Argentina, China, Ecuador and Suriname.
 
Accounting policies for geographical segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Transfers between segments are accounted for at market value. We do not consider interest income and expense or income tax benefit or expense in our evaluation of the performance of geographical segments.
 
                                 
Other Int'l,
 
         
United
   
West
               
Corporate &
 
   
Total
   
States
   
Africa
   
North Sea
   
Israel
   
Marketing
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                                   
Revenues from third parties
  $ 3,061,102     $ 1,609,626     $ 405,988     $ 363,886     $ 113,001     $ 568,601  
Intersegment revenue
    -       342,809       -       -       -       (342,809 )
Income from equity method investees
    210,928       -       210,928       -       -       -  
Total Revenues
    3,272,030       1,952,435       616,916       363,886       113,001       225,792  
                                                 
DD&A
    727,981       574,001       25,315       79,450       17,842       31,373  
Gain on derivative instruments
    (2,520 )     (2,520 )     -       -       -       -  
Loss on involuntary conversion
    51,406       51,406       -       -       -       -  
Income (loss) before taxes
    1,367,567       809,806       517,450       220,779       86,022       (266,490 )
                                                 
Investments in equity method investees
    357,129       357,129       -       -       -       -  
Additions to long-lived assets
    990,861       877,941       23,155       40,969       24,716       24,080  
Total assets at December 31, 2007 (1)
    10,830,896       7,917,771       1,354,604       562,140       268,386       727,995  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                               
Revenues from third parties
  $ 2,800,720     $ 1,510,689     $ 413,682     $ 115,232     $ 92,373     $ 668,744  
Intersegment revenue
    -       425,901       -       -       -       (425,901 )
Income from equity method investees
    139,362       -       139,362       -       -       -  
Total Revenues
    2,940,082       1,936,590       553,044       115,232       92,373       242,843  
                                                 
DD&A
    622,608       543,431       23,620       8,123       13,947       33,487  
Loss on derivative instruments
    392,367       392,367       -       -       -       -  
Income (loss) before taxes
    1,096,217       631,087       493,777       72,803       71,318       (172,768 )
                                                 
Investments in equity method investees
    373,372       -       373,372       -       -       -  
Additions to long-lived assets
    1,916,139       1,615,435       35,121       234,877       841       29,865  
Total assets at December 31, 2006 (1)
    9,588,625       7,224,920       960,357       343,236       256,913       803,199  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                               
Revenues from third parties
  $ 2,095,911     $ 913,564     $ 281,902     $ 123,584     $ 65,050     $ 711,811  
Intersegment revenue
    -       460,808       -       -       -       (460,808 )
Income from equity method investees
    90,812       -       90,812       -       -       -  
Total Revenues
    2,186,723       1,374,372       372,714       123,584       65,050       251,003  
                                                 
DD&A
    390,544       311,153       27,121       9,888       11,188       31,194  
Loss on derivative instruments
    32,680       32,680       -       -       -       -  
Loss on involuntary conversion
    1,000       1,000       -       -       -       -  
Income (loss) before taxes
    968,660       585,988       309,239       88,524       46,468       (61,559 )
                                                 
Investments in equity method investees
    420,362       -       420,362       -       -       -  
Additions to long-lived assets
    4,382,005       4,345,604       2,738       15,287       5,928       12,448  
Total assets at December 31, 2005 (1)
    8,878,033       6,577,853       877,409       146,311       266,312       1,010,148  
 
 (1)
The US reporting unit includes goodwill of $760 million at December 31, 2007, $781 million at December 31, 2006 and $863 million at December 31, 2005.

 

 
Note 16—Recently Issued Pronouncements
 
SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 – In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)”) and SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS 160”). These statements require most identifiable assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests to be recorded at full fair value and require noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity. Both statements are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS 141(R) will be applied to business combinations occurring after the effective date and SFAS 160 will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling interests, including any that arose before the effective date. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 and assessing the impact, if any, they may have on our financial position and results of operations.
 
SFAS 157— Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value based upon the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and creates a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, additional disclosures are required, including disclosures of fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS 157 is effective for fair value measures already required or permitted by other standards for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. For non-financial assets and liabilities, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 has been deferred until January 1, 2009. We are adopting SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008 and are currently in the process of determining the effects of adoption, such as the effect of incorporating our own credit standing in the measurement of certain liabilities. We do not expect that the final effects of adoption will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
SFAS 159— In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted SFAS 159 as of January 1, 2008. Adoption had no effect on our financial position or results of operations as we made no elections to report selected financial assets or liabilities at fair value.
 
FSP FIN 39-1— In April 2007, the FASB issued FSP FIN 39-1, “An Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39” (“FSP FIN 39-1”). FSP FIN 39-1 allows companies to offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments and the fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral. The cash collateral must arise from derivative instruments recognized at fair value that are executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. A company must make an accounting policy decision whether or not to offset fair value amounts. FSP FIN 39-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is to be applied retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the provisions of FSP FIN 39-1 and assessing the impact it may have on our financial position and results of operations.


Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)
 
In accordance with SFAS No. 69, “Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities” (“SFAS 69”), and regulations of the SEC, we are making the following supplemental disclosures about our crude oil and natural gas exploration and production operations.
 
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Crude oil and natural gas reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that cannot be precisely measured. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.
 
Engineers in our Houston, Denver and London offices prepare all reserve estimates for our different geographical regions. These reserve estimates are reviewed and approved by senior engineering staff and division management with final approval by the Director of Asset Development and certain members of senior management. During each of the years 2007, 2006 and 2005, we retained Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”), independent third-party reserve engineers, to perform reserve audits of proved reserves. The reserve audit for 2007 included a detailed review of 16 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 71% of US proved reserves and 96% of international proved reserves (81% of total proved reserves). The reserve audit for 2006 included a detailed review of 14 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 80% of our total proved reserves. The reserve audit for 2005 included a detailed review of 11 of our major international, deepwater Gulf of Mexico and US fields, which covered approximately 72% of our total proved reserves. See Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties—Proved Reserves.
 
Results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
 
Our supplemental disclosures are grouped by geographic area and include the United States, West Africa (Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon), Israel, Ecuador, North Sea and Other International (Argentina, China and Suriname). Operations in Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Ecuador, China and Suriname are conducted in accordance with the terms of production sharing contracts.
 
The following definitions apply to the terms used in the paragraphs above:
 
Reserve Estimate.   The determination of an estimate of a quantity of oil or gas reserves that are thought to exist at a certain date, considering existing prices and reservoir conditions.
 
Reserve Audit.   The process involving an independent third-party engineering firm’s visits, collection of any and all required geologic, geophysical, engineering and economic data, and such firm’s complete external preparation of reserve estimates.
 
The following definitions apply to our categories of proved reserves:
 
Proved Reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions (i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made). Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future conditions.
 
Proved Developed Reserves. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
 

 

 
Proved Undeveloped Reserves. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
 
For complete definitions of proved natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil reserves, refer to Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10(a)(2), (3) and (4).
 
Proved Gas Reserves (Unaudited)
 
The following reserve schedule was developed by our reserve engineers and sets forth the changes in estimated quantities of proved natural gas reserves:
 
    Natural Gas and Casinghead Gas (MMcf)
   
United
   
West
               
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Israel
   
Ecuador
   
Sea
   
Int'l (1)
   
Total
 
Proved reserves as of:
                                         
December 31, 2004
    519,735       917,409       417,293       119,341       11,714       1,369       1,986,861  
Revisions of previous estimates (2)
    18,644       7,732       481       32,800       3,200       (1,301 )     61,556  
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (3)
    144,335       -       -       -       -       -       144,335  
Purchase of minerals in place (4)
    1,083,959       -       -       -       -       -       1,083,959  
Sale of minerals in place
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Production
    (125,543 )     (23,938 )     (24,228 )     (8,321 )     (3,394 )     (68 )     (185,492 )
December 31, 2005
    1,641,130       901,203       393,546       143,820       11,520       -       3,091,219  
Revisions of previous estimates (5)
    (82,371 )     57,543       260       32,927       10,485       278       19,122  
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (6)
    314,140       -       -       -       -               314,140  
Purchase of minerals in place (7)
    141,610       2,532       -       -       -       -       144,142  
Sale of minerals in place (8)
    (110,486 )     -       -       -       -       -       (110,486 )
Production
    (164,830 )     (16,579 )     (33,906 )     (8,933 )     (2,967 )     (108 )     (227,323 )
December 31, 2006
    1,739,193       944,699       359,900       167,814       19,038       170       3,230,814  
Revisions of previous estimates (9)
    (67,003 )     44,256       (52 )     29,872       (1,062 )     (170 )     5,841  
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (10)
    315,687       -       -       -       3,086       -       318,773  
Purchase of minerals in place
    2,957       -       -       -       -       -       2,957  
Sale of minerals in place
    (1 )     -       -       -       -       -       (1 )
Production
    (150,457 )     (48,349 )     (40,449 )     (9,385 )     (2,276 )     -       (250,916 )
December 31, 2007
    1,840,376       940,606       319,399       188,301       18,786       -       3,307,468  
                                                         
Proved developed reserves as of:
                                                       
December 31, 2004
    430,513       447,347       360,428       119,341       11,714       1,118       1,370,461  
December 31, 2005
    1,278,788       431,142       336,681       143,820       11,520       -       2,201,951  
December 31, 2006
    1,255,271       359,691       303,035       167,814       19,038       170       2,105,019  
December 31, 2007
    1,259,331       830,191       262,534       188,301       15,700       -       2,556,057  
 
 (1)
Other International includes Argentina. We have entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008.
(2)
Increases for Ecuador are due to better than expected performance.
(3)
The increase in US proved reserves includes 57 Bcf in the Wattenberg field and 40 Bcf in the Mid-continent area, primarily due to infill drilling activities.
(4)
Purchase of minerals in place is the result of the Patina Merger. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(5)
Increases for Ecuador and North Sea are due to better than expected performance.
(6)
The increase in US proved reserves includes 140 Bcf in the Wattenberg field, 77 Bcf in the Piceance basin and 55 Bcf in the Mid-continent area, primarily due to infill drilling activities.
(7)
Purchase of minerals in place includes 128 Bcf acquired in the purchase of U.S. Exploration. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(8)
Sale of minerals in place is primarily due to sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(9)
The negative revisions within the US are primarily due to 103 Bcf of natural gas being reflected in the proved oil reserve table as NGLs, partially offset by positive revisions resulting from an increase in commodity price.  West Africa’s positive revisions are primarily due to additional production allowances related to LNG sales.  Positive revisions in Ecuador are related to better than expected well performance.
(10)
The increase in US proved reserves includes 142 Bcf in the Wattenberg field, 83 Bcf in the Piceance basin and 19 Bcf in the Niobrara trend, primarily due to infill drilling activities.

 

 
Proved Oil Reserves (Unaudited)
 
The following reserve schedule was developed by our reserve engineers and sets forth the changes in estimated quantities of proved crude oil reserves:
 
   
Crude Oil, Condensate and NGLs (MBbls)
 
   
United
   
West
   
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Sea
   
Int'l (1)
   
Total
 
Proved reserves as of:
                             
December 31, 2004
    55,066       108,730       9,336       20,332       193,464  
Revisions of previous estimates
    4,192       (120 )     278       168       4,518  
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (2)
    11,272       -       12,955       -       24,227  
Purchase of minerals in place (3)
    90,594       -       -       -       90,594  
Sale of minerals in place
    -       -       -       -       -  
Production (9)
    (9,468 )     (7,675 )     (1,964 )     (2,866 )     (21,973 )
December 31, 2005
    151,656       100,935       20,605       17,634       290,830  
Revisions of previous estimates
    (193 )     (1,327 )     (396 )     124       (1,792 )
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (4)
    23,037       -       -       1,794       24,831  
Purchase of minerals in place (5)
    19,328       138       -       -       19,466  
Sale of minerals in place (6)
    (6,971 )     -       -       -       (6,971 )
Production (9)
    (16,715 )     (9,450 )     (1,357 )     (2,752 )     (30,274 )
December 31, 2006
    170,142       90,296       18,852       16,800       296,090  
Revisions of previous estimates (7)
    27,998       229       776       (132 )     28,871  
Extensions, discoveries and other additions (8)
    26,634       -       10,094       -       36,728  
Purchase of minerals in place
    -       -       -       -       -  
Sale of minerals in place
    (1,903 )     -       -       -       (1,903 )
Production (9)
    (15,451 )     (8,305 )     (4,564 )     (2,436 )     (30,756 )
December 31, 2007
    207,420       82,220       25,158       14,232       329,030  
                                         
Proved developed reserves as of:
                                       
December 31, 2004
    32,390       108,730       9,336       18,040       168,496  
December 31, 2005
    114,223       100,935       7,650       15,623       238,431  
December 31, 2006
    114,505       90,296       18,852       15,936       239,589  
December 31, 2007
    128,879       71,409       15,064       13,688       229,040  

(1)
Other International includes China and Argentina. We have entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008. Argentina crude oil reserves totaled 6,759 MBbls at December 31, 2007.
(2)
The increase in total proved reserves includes 6 MMBbl in the US Wattenberg field, primarily due to infill drilling activities, 3 MMBbl in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico Lorien field and 13 MMBbl in the North Sea Dumbarton field.
(3)
Purchase of minerals in place is the result of the Patina Merger. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(4)
The increase in US proved reserves includes 14 MMBbl in the Wattenberg field, primarily due to infill drilling activities.
(5)
Purchase of minerals in place includes 18 MMBbl acquired in the purchase of U.S. Exploration. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(6)
Sale of minerals in place is primarily due to the sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(7)
The positive revisions within the US are primarily due to 29 MMBls of NGLs, previously recorded in proved natural gas reserves, being reflected in proved oil reserves, partially offset by negative revisions within the US Southern region related to less than expected well performance.
(8)
The increase in proved reserves includes 17 MMBbl in the US Wattenberg field, primarily due to infill drilling activities, 8 MMBbl in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and 10 MMBbl in the North Sea Dumbarton field area.
(9)
West Africa production includes sales from the Alba field to the Alba LPG plant of 2,805 MBbls in 2007, 2,931 MBbls in 2006 and 1,183 MBbls in 2005.


 

 
Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)
 
Aggregate results of operations in connection with crude oil and natural gas producing activities are as follows:
 
   
United
   
West
               
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Israel
   
Ecuador
   
Sea
   
Int'l (1)
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                                         
Revenues
  $ 1,952,435     $ 405,988     $ 113,001     $ 35,137     $ 363,886     $ 130,789     $ 3,001,236  
Production costs (2)
    317,984       39,222       7,711       3,203       37,987       44,339       450,446  
Transportation
    39,542       -       -       -       10,523       1,634       51,699  
E&P corporate
    31,902       3,309       1,687       3,193       3,572       2,870       46,533  
Exploration expense
    122,339       43,544       1,418       215       16,847       2,781       187,144  
DD&A
    589,705       24,949       17,805       10,353       79,380       20,413       742,605  
Impairment of operating assets
    3,661       -       -       -       -       -       3,661  
Accretion expense
    5,969       109       450       167       1,346       84       8,125  
Income before income taxes
    841,333       294,855       83,930       18,006       214,231       58,668       1,511,023  
Income tax expense
    191,427       83,685       14,339       3,582       113,860       9,713       416,606  
  Results of operations from producing  activities  (excluding corporate overhead and interest costs)
$ 649,906     $ 211,170     $ 69,591     $ 14,424     $ 100,371     $ 48,955     $ 1,094,417  
Our share of Alba Plant's results of operations from producing activities
  $ -     $ 128,051     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 128,051  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                                       
Revenues
  $ 1,936,590     $ 413,682     $ 92,373     $ 33,575     $ 115,232     $ 143,364     $ 2,734,816  
Production costs (2)
    338,655       26,556       9,066       3,021       11,655       39,596       428,549  
Transportation
    20,729       -       -       -       7,010       803       28,542  
E&P corporate
    60,710       4,656       111       3,102       3,346       2,118       74,043  
Exploration expense
    113,015       7,329       286       228       10,499       11,311       142,668  
DD&A
    561,948       23,402       13,911       11,611       8,045       25,685       644,602  
Impairment of operating assets
    8,525       -       -       -       -       -       8,525  
Accretion expense
    8,861       104       452       221       1,159       -       10,797  
Income before income taxes
    824,147       351,635       68,547       15,392       73,518       63,851       1,397,090  
Income tax expense
    313,011       125,493       19,810       3,848       42,111       23,368       527,641  
Results of operations from producting activities (exluding corporate overhead and interest costs)
  $ 511,136     $ 226,142     $ 48,737     $ 11,544     $ 31,407     $ 40,483     $ 869,449  
Our share of Alba Plant's results of operations from producing activities
  $ -     $ 101,338     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 101,338  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                                       
Revenues
  $ 1,374,374     $ 281,901     $ 65,050     $ 31,868     $ 123,583     $ 121,514     $ 1,998,290  
Production costs (2)
    216,478       30,659       8,504       3,000       12,503       28,796       299,940  
Transportation
    9,350       -       -       -       6,562       852       16,764  
E&P corporate
    34,162       435       188       2,611       2,591       947       40,934  
Exploration expense
    130,018       5,463       223       341       5,985       12,680       154,710  
DD&A
    328,645       26,978       11,120       12,246       9,866       24,237       413,092  
Impairment of operating assets
    5,368       -       -       -       -       -       5,368  
Accretion expense
    9,590       51       281       158       1,134       -       11,214  
Income (loss) before income taxes
    640,763       218,315       44,734       13,512       84,942       54,002       1,056,268  
Income tax expense
    140,916       76,518       7,752       3,378       36,834       21,033       286,431  
Results of operations from producing results of operations from producing activities
  $ 499,847     $ 141,797     $ 36,982     $ 10,134     $ 48,108     $ 32,969     $ 769,837  
Our share of Alba Plant's results of operations from producing activities
  $ -     $ 33,916     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 33,916  

(1)
Other International includes China, Argentina and Suriname.
(2)
Production costs consist of oil and gas operations expense, production and ad valorem taxes, plus general and administrative expense supporting oil and gas operations.

 

 
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development Activities (Unaudited)  (1) 
 
Costs incurred in connection with crude oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration and development are as follows:
 
   
United
   
West
               
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Israel
   
Ecuador
   
Sea
   
Int'l (2)
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2007
                                         
Property acquisition costs
                                         
Proved
  $ 11,239     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 11,239  
Unproved
    144,422       -       -       -       -       900       145,322  
Total acquisition costs
    155,661       -       -       -       -       900       156,561  
Exploration costs
    184,412       179,043       2,515       215       51,564       2,770       420,519  
Development costs (4) (5) (6)
    1,081,221       15,185       24,523       29       46,926       22,966       1,190,850  
Total consolidated operations
  $ 1,421,294     $ 194,228     $ 27,038     $ 244     $ 98,490     $ 26,636     $ 1,767,930  
Our share of Alba Plant's development costs
  $ -     $ 516     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 516  
Year Ended December 31, 2006
                                                       
Property acquisition costs
                                                       
Proved (3)
  $ 514,294     $ 7,971     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 522,265  
Unproved (3)
    157,141       25,500       1,000       -       831       -       184,472  
Total acquisition costs
    671,435       33,471       1,000       -       831       -       706,737  
Exploration costs
    204,787       13,076       286       228       18,185       11,311       247,873  
Development costs (4) (5)
    784,877       6,933       13,869       48       231,484       21,649       1,058,860  
Total consolidated operations
  $ 1,661,099     $ 53,480     $ 15,155     $ 276     $ 250,500     $ 32,960     $ 2,013,470  
Our share of Alba Plant's development costs
  $ -     $ 580     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 580  
Year Ended December 31, 2005
                                                       
Property acquisition costs
                                                       
Proved (3)
  $ 2,642,572     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 2,642,572  
Unproved (3)
    1,084,545       -       -       -       140       250       1,084,935  
Total acquisition costs
    3,727,117       -       -       -       140       250       3,727,507  
Exploration costs
    164,820       18,126       223       341       6,308       12,680       202,498  
Development costs (4) (5) (6)
    657,858       2,738       5,928       (1,660 )     19,729       13,858       698,451  
Total consolidated operations
  $ 4,549,795     $ 20,864     $ 6,151     $ (1,319 )   $ 26,177     $ 26,788     $ 4,628,456  
Our share of Alba Plant's  development costs
  $ -     $ 27,639     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 27,639  
 
(1)
Costs incurred include capitalized and expensed items.
(2)
Other International includes China, Argentina and Suriname.
(3)
Includes amounts allocated from the U.S. Exploration acquisition (2006) and the Patina Merger (2005). See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(4)
US development costs include increases in asset retirement obligations of $24 million in 2007, $4 million in 2006 and $39 million in 2005. US asset retirement costs of $33 million in 2006 and $66 million in 2005 were incurred as a result of hurricane damage and are excluded from the costs incurred schedule above as we expected to recover the costs from insurance proceeds. See Note 4—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
(5)
Worldwide development costs include amounts spent to develop proved undeveloped reserves of $1.0 billion in 2007, $768 million in 2006 and $471 million in 2005. Worldwide development costs also include $191 million spent on a floating production, storage and offloading vessel in the North Sea Dumbarton field in 2006.
(6)
North Sea development costs include increases in asset retirement obligations of $4 million in 2007 and $5 million in 2005 .
 

 

 
Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)
 
Aggregate capitalized costs relating to crude oil and natural gas producing activities, including asset retirement costs and related accumulated DD&A, are as follows:
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Unproved oil and gas properties (1)
  $ 1,164,707     $ 1,053,254  
Proved oil and gas properties (2)
    8,903,163       7,671,806  
Total oil and gas properties
    10,067,870       8,725,060  
                 
Accumulated DD&A
    (2,280,789 )     (1,707,895 )
Net capitalized costs
  $ 7,787,081     $ 7,017,165  
Our share of Alba Plant net capitalized costs
  $ 117,212     $ 124,454  

 (1)
Unproved oil and gas properties includes $628 million and $823 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, remaining from the allocation of costs to unproved properties acquired in the Patina Merger and the acquisition of U.S. Exploration.
(2)
Proved oil and gas properties include asset retirement costs of $91 million and $49 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

 
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (Unaudited)
 
The following information is based on our best estimate of the required data for the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 in accordance with SFAS 69. The standard requires the use of a 10% discount rate. This information is not the fair market value nor does it represent the expected present value of future cash flows of our proved oil and gas reserves:
 
   
United
   
West
               
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Israel
   
Ecuador
   
Sea
   
Int'l (1)
   
Total
 
   
(in millions)
 
December 31, 2007
                                         
Future cash inflows (2)
  $ 30,733     $ 6,935     $ 858     $ 704     $ 2,492     $ 879     $ 42,601  
Future production costs (3)
    5,936       1,112       180       174       516       335       8,253  
Future development costs
    3,136       202       88       12       200       15       3,653  
Future income tax expense
    6,622       1,348       146       115       881       125       9,237  
Future net cash flows
    15,039       4,273       444       403       895       404       21,458  
10% annual discount for   estimated timing of cash flows
    7,398       1,705       163       227       221       93       9,807  
Standardized measure of discounted  future net cash flows
  $ 7,641     $ 2,568     $ 281     $ 176     $ 674     $ 311     $ 11,651  
December 31, 2006
                                                       
Future cash inflows (2)
  $ 18,948     $ 4,904     $ 972     $ 629     $ 1,225     $ 808     $ 27,486  
Future production costs (3)
    4,551       738       146       162       327       187       6,111  
Future development costs
    2,846       80       90       12       35       28       3,091  
Future income tax expense
    3,422       1,348       187       130       435       177       5,699  
Future net cash flows
    8,129       2,738       549       325       428       416       12,585  
10% annual discount for  estimated timing of cash flows
    3,966       1,132       215       170       95       120       5,698  
Standardized measure of discounted   future net cash flows
  $ 4,163     $ 1,606     $ 334     $ 155     $ 333     $ 296     $ 6,887  
December 31, 2005
                                                       
Future cash inflows (2)
  $ 22,931     $ 5,436     $ 1,031     $ 539     $ 1,267     $ 868     $ 32,072  
Future production costs (3)
    5,099       556       154       47       352       290       6,498  
Future development costs
    1,887       92       88       12       184       37       2,300  
Future income tax expense
    4,645       1,589       182       142       381       159       7,098  
Future net cash flows
    11,300       3,199       607       338       350       382       16,176  
10% annual discount for  estimated timing of cash flows
    5,201       1,554       236       162       138       114       7,405  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
  $ 6,099     $ 1,645     $ 371     $ 176     $ 212     $ 268     $ 8,771  
 
(1)
Other International includes China and Argentina. We have entered into an agreement to sell our interest in Argentina effective July 1, 2007. We expect the sale, which is subject to regulatory and partner approvals, to close in 2008. Argentina’s standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows totaled $66 million at December 31, 2007.
(2)
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for 2007, 2006 and 2005 does not include cash flows relating to anticipated future methanol or power sales.
(3)
Production costs include oil and gas operations expense, production and ad valorem taxes, transportation costs and general and administrative expense supporting oil and gas operations.

 

 
Future cash inflows are computed by applying year-end prices, adjusted for location and quality differentials on a property-by-property basis, to year-end quantities of proved reserves, except in those instances where fixed and determinable price changes are provided by contractual arrangements at year-end. The discounted future cash flow estimates do not include the effects of derivative instruments. Average prices per region are as follows:
 
   
United
   
West
               
North
   
Other
       
   
States
   
Africa
   
Israel
   
Ecuador
   
Sea
   
Int'l (1)
   
Total
 
December 31, 2007
                                         
Average crude oil price per Bbl
  $ 88.00     $ 81.26     $ -     $ -     $ 93.79     $ 61.72     $ 85.62  
Average natural gas price per Mcf
    6.78       0.27       2.69       3.74       7.07       -       4.36  
December 31, 2006
                                                       
Average crude oil price per Bbl
  $ 57.02     $ 51.49     $ -     $ -     $ 57.81     $ 48.04     $ 54.87  
Average natural gas price per Mcf
    5.32       0.27       2.70       3.75       7.11       0.85       3.48  
December 31, 2005
                                                       
Average crude oil price per Bbl
  $ 58.20     $ 51.62     $ -     $ -     $ 58.47     $ 49.23     $ 55.39  
Average natural gas price per Mcf
    8.59       0.25       2.62       3.75       5.39       -       5.16  
 
(1)
Other International includes China and Argentina.

We estimate that a $1.00 per Bbl change in the average price of crude oil or a $.10 per Mcf change in the average price of natural gas from the year-end prices at December 31, 2007 would change the discounted future net cash flows before income taxes by approximately $176 million or $154 million, respectively.
 
Future production and development costs, which include dismantlement and restoration expense, are computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved crude oil and natural gas reserves at the end of the year, based on year-end costs, and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions.
 
Future development costs include amounts that we expect to spend to develop proved undeveloped reserves of $671 million in 2008, $715 million in 2009 and $408 million in 2010.
 
Future income tax expense is computed by applying the appropriate year-end statutory tax rates to the estimated future pretax net cash flows relating to proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, less the tax bases of the properties involved. Future income tax expense gives effect to tax credits and allowances, but does not reflect the impact of general and administrative costs and exploration expenses of ongoing operations.
 
Imbalance receivables and liabilities are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Imbalance receivables
  $ 12,640     $ 18,389     $ 18,100  
Imbalance liabilities
    10,288       16,750       34,600  

Imbalance receivables and imbalance liabilities have been excluded from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.

 

 
Sources of Changes in Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (Unaudited)
 
Principal changes in the aggregate standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows attributable to proved crude oil and natural gas reserves are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
      (in millions)  
Standardized measure of discounted future net  cash flows at the beginning of the year
  $ 6,887     $ 8,771     $ 3,342  
Changes in standardized measure of dicounted future net cash flows:
                       
Sales of oil and gas produced, net of production costs
    (2,427 )     (2,177 )     (1,563 )
Net changes in prices and production costs
    5,266       (2,788 )     2,160  
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs
    1,635       769       1,173  
Changes in estimated future development costs
    (775 )     (558 )     (912 )
Development costs incurred during the period
    1,189       1,076       751  
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
    1,276       (92 )     273  
Purchases of minerals in place
    6       573       4,720  
Sales of minerals in place
    (95 )     (579 )     -  
Accretion of discount
    1,006       1,274       519  
Net change in income taxes
    (1,900 )     777       (2,099 )
Change in timing of estimated future production and other
    (417 )     (159 )     407  
Aggregate change in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
    4,764       (1,884 )     5,429  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at the end of the year
  $ 11,651     $ 6,887     $ 8,771  
 
 
 
 
Supplemental quarterly financial information is as follows:
 
   
Quarter Ended
       
   
March 31,
   
June 30,
   
September 30,
   
December 31,
   
Total
 
   
(in thousands except per share amounts)
       
2007 (1)
                             
Revenues
  $ 742,545     $ 794,213     $ 813,811     $ 921,461     $ 3,272,030  
Income before taxes
    303,852       293,101       343,277       427,337       1,367,567  
Net income
    211,812       209,105       222,675       300,278       943,870  
                                         
Earnings per share:
                                       
Basic
    1.24       1.22       1.30       1.75       5.52  
Diluted
    1.22       1.21       1.28       1.73       5.45  
2006 (2)
                                       
Revenues
  $ 711,997     $ 772,580     $ 741,319     $ 714,186     $ 2,940,082  
Income before taxes
    349,353       (44,865 )     544,966       246,763       1,096,217  
Net income
    226,087       (30,705 )     318,064       164,982       678,428  
                                         
Earnings per share:
                                       
Basic
    1.28       (0.17 )     1.80       0.95       3.86  
Diluted
    1.26       (0.17 )     1.75       0.94       3.79  
 
(1)
First quarter 2007 includes a loss on involuntary conversion of $13 million and second quarter 2007 includes a loss on involuntary conversion of $38 million. See Note 3—Effect of Gulf Coast Hurricanes.
(2)
First quarter 2006 includes a mark-to-market gain of $39 million due to a loss of cash flow hedge accounting treatment for certain derivative instruments, and a loss of $25 million related to amounts previously recorded in AOCL due to a delay in the timing of production. Second quarter 2006 includes a loss of $399 million related to amounts previously recorded in AOCL due to the sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. Third quarter 2006 includes a gain of $204 million from the sale of Gulf of Mexico shelf properties. Fourth quarter 2006 includes an additional gain of $7 million from the sale of Gulf of Mexico Shelf properties. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures and Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
 
Item 9.
 
None.
 
Item 9A.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or furnish to the SEC under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and the application of judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.
 


 
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The management report called for by Item 308(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
The independent auditor’s attestation report called for by Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Internal Control Over Financial Reporting), included in Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we implemented the first phase of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software system to replace our various legacy systems.  As appropriate, we modified the design and documentation of internal control processes and procedures relating to the new system.  We believe that the new ERP system has strengthened and will continue to fortify our internal controls over financial reporting as additional phases are put to use; however, there are inherent risks in implementing any new system that could impact our financial reporting. See Item 1A. Risk Factors— Information technology systems implementation issues could disrupt our internal operations, increase our costs and adversely affect our financial results or our ability to report our financial results.
 
In the event that issues arise, we have manual procedures in place which would facilitate our continued recording and reporting of results from the new ERP system. However, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect or prevent misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
We will continue to monitor, test, and appraise the impact and effect of the new ERP system on our internal controls and procedures as additional phases and features of the system are implemented. There were no changes in internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting, except as described above.
 
Item 9B.
None.
 

 

 
PART III
 
Item 10.
 
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2007.
 
Item 11.
 
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2007.
 
Item 12.
 
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2007.
 
Item 13.
 
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2007.
 
Item 14.
 
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2007.
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.
(a)       The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
 
 
(3)
Exhibits: The exhibits required to be filed by this Item 15 are set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this report.
 

 

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
 
(Registrant)
   
Date: February 27, 2008
By: /s/ Charles D. Davidson
 
Charles D. Davidson,
 
Chairman of the Board, President,
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director
   
Date: February 27, 2008
By: /s/ Chris Tong
 
Chris Tong,
 
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
   
Date: February 27, 2008
By: /s/ Frederick B. Bruning
 
Frederick B. Bruning,
 
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer

 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Signature
     
Capacity in which signed
     
Date
   
         
/s/ Charles D. Davidson
 
Chairman of the Board, President,
 
February 27, 2008
Charles D. Davidson
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director
   
   
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
         
/s/ Chris Tong
 
Senior Vice President,
 
February 27, 2008
Chris Tong
 
Chief Financial Officer
   
   
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
         
/s/ Frederick B. Bruning
 
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
 
February 27, 2008
Frederick B. Bruning
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
         
/s/ Jeffrey L. Berenson
 
Director
 
February 27, 2008
Jeffrey L. Berenson
       
         
/s/ Michael A. Cawley
 
Director
 
February 27, 2008
Michael A. Cawley
       
         
/s/ Edward F. Cox
 
Director
 
February 27, 2008
Edward F. Cox
       
         
/s/ Thomas J. Edelman
 
Director
 
February 27, 2008
Thomas J. Edelman
       
         
/s/ Kirby L. Hedrick
 
 Director
 
February 27, 2008
Kirby L. Hedrick
       
         
/s/ Scott D. Urban
 
 Director
 
February 27, 2008
Scott D. Urban
       
         
/s/ William T. Van Kleef
 
 Director
 
February 27, 2008
William T. Van Kleef
       


 
 
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
            Exhibit **
3.1
 
 
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the Registrant as currently in effect (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
3.2
 
 
Composite copy of Bylaws of the Registrant as currently in effect (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 29, 2002) dated February 8, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.1
 
 
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant dated August 27, 1997 (filed as Exhibit A of Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on August 28, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.2
 
 
Certificate of Designations of Series B Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant dated November 9, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.3
 
 
Indenture dated as of October 14, 1993 between the Registrant and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee, relating to the Registrant’s 7 1/4% Notes Due 2023, including form of the Registrant’s 7 1/4% Notes Due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.4
 
 
Indenture relating to Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 1, 1997 between the Registrant and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.5
 
 
First Indenture Supplement relating to $250 million of the Registrant’s 8% Senior Notes Due 2027 dated as of April 1, 1997 between the Registrant and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.6
 
 
Second Indenture Supplement, between the Company and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A. as trustee, relating to $100 million of the Registrant’s 7 1/4% Senior Debentures Due 2097 dated as of August 1, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.7
 
 
Third Indenture Supplement relating to $200 million of the Registrant’s 5.25% Notes due 2014 dated April 19, 2004 between the Company and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee to U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-116092) and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.1 *
 
 
Restoration of Retirement Income Plan for Certain Participants in the Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Plan dated September 21, 1994, effective as of May 19, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.2 *
 
 
Amendment No. 1 to the Restoration of Retirement Income Plan for Certain Participants in the Noble Affiliates Retirement Plan executed March 26, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.3 *
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Restoration Trust effective August 1, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.4 *
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly known as the Noble Affiliates Thrift Restoration Plan dated May 9, 1994) as restated effective August 1, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.5 *
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as amended, dated April 25, 2005, and approved by the stockholders of the Company on April 29, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.6 *
 
 
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: February 1, 2005) filed February 7, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.7 *
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: February 1, 2005) filed February 7, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.8 *
 
 
1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Registrant, as amended and restated, effective as of April 27, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.9 *
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan dated April 25, 2002 and effective as of April 23, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.10*
 
 
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Registrant and each of the Registrant’s directors and bylaw officers (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.11
 
 
Guaranty of the Registrant dated October 28, 1982, guaranteeing certain obligations of Samedan (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.12
 
 
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 1, 1996, between Samedan Oil Corporation and Enterprise Diversified Holdings Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: July 31, 1996) dated August 13, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
106

 
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
     
 
Exhibit **
10.13
 
 
Noble Preferred Stock Remarketing and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 10, 1999 by and among the Registrant, Noble Share Trust, The Chase Manhattan Bank, and Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.14*
 
 
Letter agreement dated February 1, 2002 between the Registrant and Charles D. Davidson, terminating Mr. Davidson’s employment agreement and entering into the attached Change of Control Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.15*
 
 
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into between the Registrant and each of the Registrant’s officers, with schedule setting forth differences in Change of Control Agreements (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.16
 
 
364-day Credit Agreement dated as of November 27, 2002 among the Registrant, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as the administrative agent for the lenders, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as the syndication agent for the lenders, Societe Generale, Citibank, N.A., Deutsche Bank Ag New York Branch, and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as co-documentation agents, and certain commercial lending institutions, as lenders, (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.17
 
 
364-day Credit Agreement dated as of October 30, 2003 among the Registrant, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as the administrative agent for the lenders, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as the syndication agent for the lenders, Societe Generale, Deutsche Bank Ag New York Branch, and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as co-documentation agents, and certain commercial lending institutions, as lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.18
 
 
Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 30, 2004 among Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd., as borrower, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as initial lender and agent for the lenders, and certain commercial lending institutions, as lenders (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.19
 
 
Guaranty of the Company dated January 30, 2004 guaranteeing obligations of Noble Energy Mediterranean, Ltd. under the Term Loan Agreement dated January 30, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.20
 
 
Term Loan Agreement dated as of February 2, 2004 among Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd., as borrower, Bank One, NA, as agent for the lenders, and certain commercial lending institutions, as lenders (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.21
 
 
Guaranty of the Company dated February 2, 2004 guaranteeing obligations of Noble Energy Mediterranean, Ltd. under the Term Loan Agreement dated February 2, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.22
 
 
Term Loan Agreement dated as of February 4, 2004 among Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd., as borrower, The Royal Bank of Scotland Finance (Ireland), as agent for the lenders and as the initial lender (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.23
 
 
Guaranty of the Company dated February 4, 2004 guaranteeing obligations of Noble Energy Mediterranean, Ltd. under the Term Loan Agreement dated February 4, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: January 30, 2004) filed May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.24*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan effective as of January 1, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.25*
 
 
Form of Performance Units Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Program (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: February 1, 2005) filed February 7, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.26
 
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 7, 2006, among Noble Energy Production, Inc., U.S. Exploration Holdings, LLC, U.S. Exploration Holdings, Inc. and United States Exploration, Inc., filed herewith (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.27
 
 
$2.1 billion Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated December 9, 2005, among Noble Energy, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Citibank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, and certain other commercial lending institutions named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: December 9, 2005), filed December 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.28
 
 
$2.1 billion Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated November 30, 2006, among Noble Energy, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Citibank, N.A. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as co-documentation agents, and certain other commercial lending institutions named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: November 30, 2006), filed December 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.29*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan, dated December 5, 2005 and effective as of January 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: December 5, 2005), filed December 8, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.30*
 
 
Amendment No. 1 to the Noble Energy, Inc. Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan, dated December 5, 2005 and effective as of January 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: December 5, 2005), filed December 8, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
 
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
     
 
Exhibit **
  10.31*
 
 
  Consulting Agreement, dated May 9, 2005 but commencing May 16, 2005, by and between Noble Energy, Inc. and Thomas J. Edelman (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: May 16, 2005), filed May 20, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.32*
 
 
2005 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Noble Energy, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: April 26, 2005) filed April 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.33*
 
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.34*
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.35*
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan entered into by certain executive officers and key employees of the Company on May 16, 2005 and August 1, 2005, respectively (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.36
 
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 15, 2006 by and between the Company and Coldren Resources LP (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.37*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan for Executives (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: October 24, 2006) filed October 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.38*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc.  1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (as amended through April 24, 2007), (filed as exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Date of Event: April 24, 2007) filed April 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
10.39*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.40*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan for Executives (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.41*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Agreement (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.42*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.43*
 
 
Amendment to the 2006 Performance Units Agreement (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.44*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended effective January 1, 2008) filed herewith.
 
10.45*
 
 
Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Restoration Plan (as amended effective December 1, 2007) filed herewith.
 
21
 
 
Subsidiaries, filed herewith.
 
23.1
 
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—KPMG LLP, filed herewith.
 
23.2
 
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith.
 
23.3
 
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—UHY LLP, filed herewith.
 
23.4
 
 
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., filed herewith.
 
31.1
 
 
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241).
 
31.2
 
 
Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241).
 
32.1
 
 
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
 
32.2
 
 
Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
 
99.1
 
 
Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm—PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith.
 
99.2
 
 
Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm—UHY LLP, filed herewith.
 
99.3
 
 
Report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc, filed herewith.
 
   
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto.
 
   
**
Copies of exhibits will be furnished upon prepayment of 25 cents per page. Requests should be addressed to the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Noble Energy, Inc., 100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77067.

GLOSSARY
 
In this report, the following abbreviations are used:
 
Bbl(s)
Barrel(s)
MBbls
Thousand barrels
MMBbls
Million barrels
Bpd
Barrels per day
Bopd
Barrels oil per day
Boe
Barrels oil equivalent
MBoe
Thousand barrels oil equivalent
MMBoe
Million barrels oil equivalent
Boepd
Barrels oil equivalent per day
Kgal
Thousand gallons
KW
Kilowatt
KWh
Kilowatt hours
MW
Megawatt
Mcf
Thousand cubic feet
MMcf
Million cubic feet
Bcf
Billion cubic feet
Tcf
Trillion cubic feet
Mcfpd
Thousand cubic feet per day
MMcfpd
Million cubic feet per day
Mcfe
Thousand cubic feet equivalent
MMcfe
Million cubic feet equivalent
Bcfe
Billion cubic feet equivalent
BTU
British thermal unit
MMBtu
Million British thermal units
MMBtupd
Million British thermal units per day
Btupcf
British thermal unit per cubic foot
MT
Metric tons
MTpd
Metric tons per day
LNG
Liquefied natural gas
LPG
Liquefied petroleum gas
NGL
Natural gas liquid

 
109

 


 


 
EXHIBIT 10.39


 
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.

2005 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR FEE DEFERRAL PLAN

THIS AMENDED PLAN, made and executed by Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) at Houston, Texas,

WITNESSETH THAT :

WHEREAS, effective as of April 23, 2002, the Company (formerly known as Noble Affiliates, Inc.) established the Noble Affiliates, Inc. Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (the “Original Plan”) for the benefit of the non-employee directors of the Company; and

WHEREAS, effective as of August 1, 2003, the Original Plan was renamed the Noble Energy, Inc. Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan and amended by restatement in its entirety to make certain changes; and

WHEREAS, in order to make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A, effective as of January 1, 2005, the Original Plan was amended to separate the portion of the Original Plan applicable to amounts deferred prior to January 1, 2005 (which portion continues to be known as the Noble Energy, Inc. Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan), from the portion of the Original Plan applicable to amounts deferred after December 31, 2004 (which portion is this Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan); and

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend this Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Directors Plan to make certain additional changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 thereof, the Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety effective as of January 1, 2008, to read as follows:

Section 1 .       Establishment and Purpose .   The Company has established this Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan to promote the long-term success of the Company by creating a long-term mutuality of interests between the non-employee directors and stockholders of the Company, to provide an additional inducement for such directors to remain with the Company and to provide a means through which the Company may attract able persons to serve as directors of the Company.

Section 2 .       Definitions .   For purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall have the indicated meanings:

(a)          “Affiliate” means any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Code section 414(b) or Code section 414(c); provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.

(b)          “Applicable Percentage” means, with respect to a particular month, the annual prime rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, Dallas, Texas for the first business day of such month.

 
1

 
 

(c)          “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)          “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(e)          “Committee” means the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors.

(f)          “Company” means Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

(g)          “Deferral Account” means an account established and maintained on the books of the Company pursuant to Plan Section 4(b) to record a Participant’s interest under the Plan.

(h)          “Director Fees” means all cash compensation payable by the Company to a Non-Employee Director for his or her services as a director of the Company.

(i)          “Election Period” means, with respect to a Plan Year, the 3-month period prior to the beginning of such year.  The term “Election Period” shall also include the 30-day election period provided for under Plan Section 4(a).

(j)          “Non-Employee Director” means an individual who (i) is a member of the Board of Directors by virtue of being elected to the Board of Directors by the stockholders of the Company or by the Board of Directors under applicable corporate law, and (ii) is not an officer or employee of the Company or an Affiliate.

(k)          “Participant” means a Non-Employee Director or former Non-Employee Director for whom a Deferral Account is being maintained under the Plan.

(l)          “Plan” means this Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan as in effect from time to time.

(m)          “Plan Year” means the calendar year.

Section 3 .       Plan Administration .   The Plan shall be administered by the Committee.  The Committee shall have discretionary and final authority to interpret and implement the provisions of the Plan.  The Committee shall act by a majority of its members at the time in office and such action may be taken either by a vote at a meeting or in writing without a meeting.  The Committee may adopt such rules and procedures for the administration of the Plan as are consistent with the terms hereof and shall keep adequate records of its proceedings and acts.  Every interpretation, choice, determination of other exercise by the Committee of any power or discretion given either expressly or by implication to it shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties having or claiming to have an interest under the Plan or otherwise directly or indirectly affected by such action (without restriction, however, on the right of the Committee to reconsider and redetermine such action).  The Plan is intended to provide compensation and benefits that are not subject to the tax imposed under Internal Revenue Code section 409A and shall be interpreted and administered to the extent possible in accordance with such intent.


 
2

 
 
 
     Section 4.       Deferred Compensation Provisions .

(a)            Deferral Elections .  During the Election Period for each Plan Year a Non-Employee Director may elect to have all or any portion of the Director Fees otherwise payable to him or her for his or her services to be performed for such year deferred for future payment by the Company in accordance with the provisions of the Plan.  If an individual becomes a Non-Employee Director for the first time during a Plan Year, or if a former Non-Employee Director resumes serving as a Non-Employee Director during a Plan Year and was not a Non-Employee Director during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of his or her resumption of service as a Non-Employee Director, such Non-Employee Director may make the election referred to in this Plan Section 4(a) within thirty (30) days after the date he or she first becomes or resumes being, as the case may be, a Non-Employee Director; provided, however, that the deferral election so made shall apply only to the Director Fees otherwise payable to such Non-Employee Director for his or her services to be performed after the end of said 30-day election period.  The deferral election made by a Non-Employee Director for a Plan Year pursuant to this Plan Section 4(a) shall specify (i) the portion of the Directors Fees otherwise payable to him or her for such year that shall be deferred pursuant to the Plan, (ii) the date that the amount credited to his or her Deferral Account for such year shall be distributed or commence being distributed (which date shall be at least twelve (12) months after the end of the Election Period for such year, and shall be subject to being accelerated in accordance with the provisions of Plan Section 4(d), Plan Section 5 or Plan Section 6(c)), and (iii) the form of distribution that shall apply to the amount credited to his or her Deferral Account for such year.  The deferral election made by a Non-Employee Director for a Plan Year pursuant to this Plan Section 4(a) shall (i) be made in writing on a form prescribed by and filed with the Committee, (ii) be irrevocable after the end of the Election Period for such Plan Year, and (iii) continue to be effective as a deferral election made for each succeeding Plan Year until such Non-Employee Director changes or terminates his or her deferral election for a succeeding Plan Year during the Election Period for such year.  If no deferral election under this Plan is in effect for a Non-Employee Director for a Plan Year, his or her Director Fees for such year shall be paid by the Company to him or her in cash on the dates such Directors Fees are normally due to be paid under the policies and practices of the Company with respect thereto.

(b)            Deferral Accounts .  For each Plan Year the Company shall establish and maintain on its books a Deferral Account for each Non-Employee Director who elects to defer a Director Fees amount for such year pursuant to Plan Section 4(a).  Each such Account shall be designated by the name of the Participant for whom established and the Plan Year to which it relates, and the amount of any Director Fees otherwise payable by the Company to a Participant for a Plan Year that such Participant has elected to defer for such year pursuant to Plan Section 4(a) shall be credited by the Company to such Participant’s Deferral Account for that year on the date such amount would otherwise have been paid by the Company to such Participant.

(c)            Deferral Account Adjustments .  On the last day of each month, the amount credited to each Deferral Account maintained for a Participant shall be credited with notional earnings in an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying one-twelfth (1/12) of the Applicable Percentage by the amount that has been credited to such Account for the entire period of such month.

(d)            Deferral Account Payments .  The amount credited to a Deferral Account maintained for a Participant (i) shall be distributed or commence being distributed, as the case may be, to such Participant pursuant to this Plan Section 4(d) on the first day of the first month commencing after the first to occur of (1) the date specified by such Participant in his or her election filed with the Committee for such Deferral Account during the Election Period for the Plan Year to which such Deferral Account relates, or (2) the date of such Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the regulations and other guidance issued thereunder) with the group of service recipients that includes the Company and each Affiliate, and (ii) shall be distributed to such Participant either in a single distribution or in approximately equal annual installments over a period of up to five (5) years, such form of distribution to be made in accordance with such Participant’s election filed with the Committee for such Deferral Account during the Election Period for the Plan Year to which such Deferral Account relates.  The amount of any annual installment payment shall be determined by dividing the total undistributed balance remaining to be paid by the number of installments remaining to be paid.  Installment payments after the first of a series of installment payments shall be made on anniversary dates of the first installment payment.  When an amount credited to a Participant’s Deferral Account becomes distributable, such amount shall be paid by the Company to such Participant in cash and charged against such Deferral Account.  If the amount credited to a Deferral Account is paid in installments over a period of years, the provisions of Plan Section 4(c) shall continue to apply to the amount credited to such Deferral Account from time to time.

(e)            Death of Participant .  Upon the death of a Participant, the amount credited to each Deferral Account maintained for such Participant shall be paid by the Company in a single distribution in cash to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by such Participant and charged against such Deferral Account.  Such designation of beneficiary or beneficiaries shall be made in writing on a form prescribed by and filed with the Committee, and shall remain in effect until changed by such Participant by the filing of a new beneficiary designation form with the

 
3

 

Committee.  If a Participant fails to so designate a beneficiary, or in the event all of the designated beneficiaries are individuals who predecease the Participant, any remaining amount payable under the Plan shall be paid to such Participant’s estate.  All distributions under this Plan Section 4(e) shall be made within 90 days following the Participant’s death.

Section 5.       Plan Amendment and Termination .   The Board of Directors shall have the right and power at any time and from time to time to amend the Plan, in whole or in part, for any reason; provided, however, that no such amendment shall reduce the amount actually credited to a Participant’s Deferral Account as of the date of such amendment, or further defer the date or dates for the payment of such amount, without the consent of the affected Participant.  The Board of Directors shall also have the right and power at any time and for any reason to terminate the Plan and to provide for the distribution to a Participant of the amounts then credited to his or her Deferral Accounts in a manner that does not subject such amounts to the tax imposed by Code section 409A.

Section 6.       General Provisions .

(a)            Nature of Plan and Rights .  The Plan is unfunded and maintained by the Company primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for Non-Employee Directors.  The Deferral Accounts maintained under this Plan are fictional devices used solely for the accounting purposes of the Plan to determine an amount of money to be paid by the Company to a Participant pursuant to the Plan, and shall not be deemed or construed to create a trust fund or security interest of any kind or to grant a property interest of any kind to any Participant, designated beneficiary or estate.  The amounts credited by the Company to Deferral Accounts maintained under the Plan are and for all purposes shall continue to be a part of the general liabilities of the Company, and to the extent that a Participant, designated beneficiary or estate acquires a right to receive a cash payment from the Company pursuant to the Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.

(b)            No Continuing Right as Director .  Neither the adoption or operation of the Plan, nor the Plan itself or any document describing or relating to the Plan, shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue as a director of the Company or interfere in any way with the rights of the stockholders of the Company or the Board of Directors to elect and remove directors.

(c)            Special Distributions .  Any provision of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the Committee in its absolute discretion may direct the Company to accelerate the time for the making of a payment under the Plan to or with respect to a Participant to the extent that such acceleration is a permitted exception under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(j)(4) (or other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service) that does not subject such accelerated payment to the tax imposed by Code section 409A.
 
(d)            Compliance with Code Section 409A .  The compensation payable by the Company to a Participant or beneficiary of a deceased Participant pursuant to the Plan is intended to be compensation that is not subject to the tax imposed by Code section 409A, and the Plan shall be administered and construed to the fullest extent possible to reflect and implement such intent.
 
(e)            Spendthrift Provision .  No Deferral Account balance or other right or interest under the Plan of a Participant, designated beneficiary or estate may be assigned, transferred or alienated, in whole or in part, either directly or by operation of law (except pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order within the meaning of Code section 414(p)), and no such balance, right or interest shall be liable for or subject to any debt, obligation or liability of such Participant, designated beneficiary or estate.

(f)            Severability .  If any provision of the Plan is held to be illegal or invalid for any reason, such illegal or invalid provision shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included herein.

(g)            Expenses .  All expenses associated with the administration of the Plan, including but not limited to legal and accounting fees, shall be paid by the Company.

 
4

 

(h)            Binding Effect .  The obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be binding upon any successor corporation or organization resulting from the merger, consolidation or other reorganization of the Company, or upon any successor corporation or organization succeeding to all or substantially all of the assets and business of the Company.  The terms and conditions of the Plan shall be binding upon each Participant and his or her heirs, legatees, distributee and legal representatives.

(i)            Governing Law .  The provisions of the Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws (without regard to principles of conflicts of laws) of the State of Texas.

(j)            Construction .  The headings of the Sections and subsections in the Plan are placed herein for convenience of reference only, and in case of any conflict, the text of this instrument, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.  When a noun or pronoun is used in the Plan in plural form and there is only one person or entity within the scope of the word so used, or in singular form and there is more than one person or entity within the scope of the word so used, such noun or pronoun shall have a plural or singular meaning as appropriate under the circumstance.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Plan on this 18th day of December, 2007, to be effective as of January 1, 2008.

 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ Charles D. Davidson  
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer  
       


 
5

 


 
EXHIBIT 10.40



NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES


THIS CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES, made and executed at Houston, Texas, by Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),

WITNESSETH THAT:

WHEREAS, effective as of October 24, 2006, the Company established the Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan for Executives (the “Plan”) to provide for the payment of severance benefits to certain key employees of the Company and its participating affiliates whose employment with the Company or such an affiliate terminated under certain circumstances; and
 
WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Plan is hereby amended by restatement its entirety effective as of January 1, 2008, to read as follows:
 

 
ARTICLE I.

DEFINITIONS

1.1            Definitions .   Where the following words and phrases appear in the Plan, they shall have the respective meanings set forth below, unless their context clearly indicates to the contrary.

(a)       “Affiliated Company” means any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Code section 414(b) or Code section 414(c); provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.
 
(b)       Annual Cash Compensation shall mean, with respect to a Covered Employee, such Covered Employee’s annualized salary in effect on the date of the earliest Change of Control to occur during the 18-month period prior to the date of such Covered Employee’s Involuntary Termination, plus the greater of (1) such Covered Employee’s annual target bonus for the then-current annual bonus period, or (2) the average annual bonus paid or payable by the Employer to such Covered Employee for the three-year period (or for the period of such Covered Employee’s employment, if such Covered Employee has not been employed for all of such three-year period) immediately preceding the date of such Change of Control.
 
(c)       Applicable Factor shall mean the factor specified as applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, a Senior Executive and a Key Executive, respectively, on the attached Schedule A.
 

 
1

 

(d)       Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
 
(e)       A Change of Control shall be deemed to have occurred if:
 
(1)           individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty­-one percent (51%) of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election, or nomination for election, by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of the Plan, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board;

(2)           the stockholders of the Company shall approve a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own outstanding voting securities representing at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Voting Securities”) of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company;

(3)           the stockholders of the Company shall approve a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the stock or assets of the Company; or

(4)           any “person,” as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any of its subsidiaries, any employee benefit plan of  the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any entity organized, appointed or established by the Company for or pursuant to the terms of such a plan), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) of such person (as well as any “Person” or “group” as those terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), shall become the “beneficial owner” or “beneficial owners” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing in the aggregate twenty-five percent (25%) or more of either the then outstanding shares of common stock, par value $3.33⅓ per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) or the Voting Securities of the Company, in either such case other than solely as a result of acquisitions of such securities directly from  the Company.  Without limiting the foregoing, a person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, or to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company shall be deemed the beneficial owner of such Common Stock or Voting Securities.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change of Control” of the Company shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of paragraph (4) of this Section 1.1(d) solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company outstanding, increases (i) the proportionate number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or (ii) the proportionate voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if any person referred to in clause (i) or (ii) of this sentence shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company (other than a result of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction), then a Change of Control of  the Company shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes of paragraph (4) of this Section 1.1(d).

(f)       Chief Executive Officer shall mean the individual who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
 
(g)       Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 

 
2

 

(h)       Committee shall mean the committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan.
 
(i)       Company shall mean Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
(j)       A Constructive Termination shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to a Covered Employee if the Employer:
 
(1)           within two (2) years after a Change of Control occurs, demotes such Covered Employee to a lesser position, in title or responsibility, as compared to the highest position held by him or her with the Employer at the earlier of the occurrence of a Change of Control or the date on which a tentative agreement is reached by the Employer, or a public announcement is made, regarding a proposed Change of Control that ultimately occurs;

(2)           within two (2) years after a Change of Control occurs, reduces such Covered Employee’s total annual compensation (i.e., the sum of his or her annual salary, his or her target bonus under the Employer’s annual incentive bonus plan or similar plan in effect at the applicable time and the value of other employment benefits provided to such Covered Employee by the Employer) below the level in effect at the earlier of the occurrence of a Change of Control or the date on which a tentative agreement is reached by the Employer, or a public announcement is made, regarding a proposed Change of Control that ultimately occurs; or

(3)           within one (1) year after a Change of Control occurs, requires or requests such Covered Employee to relocate to a principal place of employment more than fifty (50) miles from the location where he or she was principally employed immediately prior to the Change of Control.

(k)       Covered Employee shall mean an individual who is the Chief Executive Officer, a Senior Executive or a Key Executive, excluding, however, any individual who is a party to an individual written change of control agreement with the Employer providing severance payments upon such individual’s termination of employment with the Employer.
 
(l)       Effective Date shall mean January 1, 2008.
 
(m)       Employer shall include the Company and each other entity or organization that adopts the Plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.4 of the Plan and their successors.
 
(n)       ERISA shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
 
(o)       Involuntary Termination shall mean a Covered Employee’s Separation from Service which:
 
(1)           does not result from a voluntary resignation by the Covered Employee (other than a resignation pursuant to Section 1.1(o)(2)); or

(2)           results from a resignation by a Covered Employee on or before the date which is sixty (60) days after the date the Covered Employee is notified of a Constructive Termination applicable to him or her;

provided, however, that the term “Involuntary Termination” shall not include a Termination for Cause or a Covered Employee’s Separation from Service as a result of such Covered Employee’s death, disability under circumstances entitling him or her to benefits under the Employer’s long-term disability plan, or Retirement.
 

 
3

 
 
(p)       Key Executive”   shall mean a Covered Employee who is employed by the Employer in a job category or position specified as a Key Executive job category or position on the attached Schedule A.
 
(q)       Payment Date” shall mean (1) with respect to a Covered Employee who is not a Specified Employee, the date that is thirty (30) days after the date of such Covered Employee’s Involuntary Termination, and (2) with respect to a Covered Employee who is a Specified Employee, the earlier of (i) the first business day that is six (6) months after the date of such Covered Employee’s Involuntary Termination, or (ii) the date that is thirty (30) days after the date of such Covered Employee’s death following his or her Separation from Service.
 
(r)       Retirement ” shall mean a Covered Employee’s voluntary resignation on   or after the date as of which he or she either (1) has attained age fifty-five (55) and completed five (5) years of Vesting Service (within the meaning of the Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Plan as in effect immediately prior to a Change in Control), or (2) has attained age sixty-five (65) (regardless of the number of his or her years of such Vesting Service), excluding in either case, however, a resignation at the request of the Employer or a resignation within sixty (60) days after such Covered Employee is notified of a Constructive Termination applicable to him or her.
 
(s)       Senior Executive shall mean a Covered Employee who is employed by the Employer in a job category or position specified as a Senior Executive job category or position on the attached Schedule A.
 
(t)       “Separation from Service” means, with respect to a Covered Employee, such Covered Employee’s separation from service (within the meaning of Code section 409A and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder) with the group of employers that includes the Company and each Affiliated Company.  With respect to services as an employee, an employee’s Separation from Service shall be deemed to occur on the date as of which the employee and his or her employer reasonably anticipate that no further services will be performed after such date or that the level of bona fide services the employee will perform after such date (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) will permanently decrease to no more than 20 percent of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period of services to the employer if the employee has been providing services to the employer less than 36 months).
 
(u)       “Specified Employee” means a Covered Employee who is a specified employee within the meaning of Code section 409A(a)(2) and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.  Each Specified Employee will be identified by the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) as of each December 31, using such definition of compensation permissible under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-1(i)(2) as the Compensation Committee shall determine in its discretion, and each Specified Employee so identified shall be treated as a Specified Employee for the purposes of this Plan for the entire 12-month period beginning on the April 1 following a December 31 Specified Employee identification date.
 
(v)       Termination for Cause shall mean an Employer’s or Affiliated Company’s termination of a Covered Employee’s employment with such Employer or Affiliated Company because of (1) the willful and continued failure by such Covered Employee to perform the duties of his or her position with such Employer or Affiliated Company or his or her continued failure to perform the duties reasonably requested or reasonably prescribed by the Board (other than as a result of such Covered Employee’s death or disability), (2) the engaging by such Covered Employee in conduct involving a material misuse of the funds or property of an Employer or Affiliated Company, (3) the gross negligence or willful misconduct by such Covered Employee in the performance of his or her duties that results in, or causes, material monetary harm to an Employer or Affiliated Company, (4) such Covered Employee’s commission of a felony or a civil or criminal offense involving moral turpitude, or (5) such Covered Employee’s material violation of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.  A Covered Employee’s Termination for Cause shall be made only after reasonable notice to such Covered Employee and an opportunity for such Covered Employee, together with counsel, to appear before the Board.  A Covered Employee’s Termination for Cause shall be effective only if agreed upon by a majority of the directors of the Board.
 
(w)       Welfare Benefit Coverages shall mean the medical, dental, vision and life insurance coverages provided by the Employer to its active employees.
 
1.2            Number and Gender.   Wherever appropriate herein, words used in the singular shall be considered to include the plural and the plural to include the singular.  The masculine gender, where appearing in the Plan, shall be deemed to include the feminine gender.

1.3              Headings.   The headings of Articles and Sections herein are included solely for convenience and if there is any conflict between such headings and the text of the Plan, the text shall control.
 
 
ARTICLE II.

SEVERANCE BENEFITS

2.1              Severance Benefits.   Subject to the provisions of Section 2.2, if a Covered Employee’s Separation from Service occurs by reason of an Involuntary Termination described in Section 1.1(j)(1), Section 1.1(j)(2) or Section 1.1(o)(1) which occurs within two (2) years after a Change of Control occurs, or by reason of an Involuntary Termination described in Section 1.1(j)(3) which occurs within one (1) year after a Change of Control occurs, the Employer shall:

(a)           pay to such Covered Employee when due under the Employer’s normal payroll procedures all unpaid salary due to, and unreimbursed expenses incurred by, such Covered Employee in the performance of his or her duties for the Employer through the date of such Involuntary Termination;

 
4

 

(b)           pay to such Covered Employee on his or her Payment Date an amount in cash equal to such Covered Employee’s Annual Cash Compensation multiplied by the Applicable Factor that applies to such Covered Employee;

(c)           pay to such Covered Employee on his or her Payment Date an amount in cash equal to such Covered Employee’s prorata (measured as the number of days expired, as of the annual date of such Involuntary Termination, in the then-current annual bonus period, divided by 365) target bonus for the then-current annual bonus period;

(d)           within thirty (30) days of receiving a detailed invoice for same, reimburse such Covered Employee, up to a maximum cumulative amount of $15,000, for the reasonable fees of no more than one (1) out-placement or similar service provider engaged by such Covered Employee to assist in finding employment opportunities for such Covered Employee during the one-year period following the date of such Involuntary Termination, provided that all reimbursements to be made pursuant to this Section 2.1(d) shall be made to such Covered Employee no later than the end of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which such Covered Employee’s Separation from Service occurs; and

(e)           provide such Covered Employee with continued Welfare Benefit Coverages for himself or herself and, where applicable, his or her eligible dependents, for the period of months following the date of such Involuntary Termination that is specified for such Covered Employee on the attached Schedule A; provided, however, that such Covered Employee must continue to pay the premiums paid by active employees of the Employer from time to time for such coverages.  Such benefit rights shall apply only to those Welfare Benefit Coverages that the Employer has in effect from time to time for active employees.  If the Employer determines that providing one of the Welfare Benefit Coverages under a welfare plan maintained by the Employer will fail to satisfy a nondiscrimination requirement that the Employer intended such welfare plan to satisfy, then instead of providing such benefit under such welfare plan, the Employer may provide such benefit to or with respect to such Covered Employee under another plan or insurance arrangement.  Welfare Benefit Coverages shall immediately end upon the Covered Employee’s obtainment of new employment and eligibility for similar Welfare Benefit Coverages (with the Covered Employee being obligated hereunder to promptly report such eligibility to the Employer).

The severance benefits payable under this Section 2.1 (1) shall be deemed to be severance pay subject to any required tax withholding, and (2) shall not constitute compensation that is taken into account for the purposes of determining benefits or allocating contributions under any employee benefit plan (within the meaning of ERISA) maintained by the Employer.

2.2            Release and Full Settlement .   Any provision of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, as a condition to the receipt of any severance benefit hereunder, a Covered Employee whose Separation from Service occurs by reason of an Involuntary Termination shall execute a release and indemnity, in such reasonable form as may be approved by the Committee, releasing the Board, the Committee, the Employer and the Employer’s affiliates, shareholders, partners, officers, directors, employees and agents from, and indemnifying each such party against, any and all claims and causes of action of any kind or character, including but not limited to all claims or causes of action arising out of such Covered Employee’s employment with the Employer, the termination of such employment and the performance of the Employer’s obligations hereunder, and the receipt by such Covered Employee of any benefit provided hereunder shall constitute full settlement of all such claims and causes of action of such Covered Employee.

2.3            Mitigation.   A Covered Employee shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this Article II by seeking other employment or otherwise, nor shall the amount of any payment provided for in this Article II be reduced by any compensation or benefit earned by the Covered Employee as the result of employment by another employer or by retirement benefits.  The benefits under the Plan are in addition to any other benefits to which a Covered Employee is otherwise entitled.

2.4            Gross-Up Payment .  In the event that (a) a Covered Employee becomes entitled to the severance benefits provided under Section 2.1 (the “Change of Control Benefits”) and any of the Change of Control Benefits will be subject to the tax (the “Excise Tax”) imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or any successor provision, or (b) any payments or benefits received or to be received by such Covered Employee pursuant to the terms of any other plan, arrangement or agreement (the “Other Benefits”) will be subject to the Excise Tax, the Employer shall pay to such Covered Employee an additional amount (the “Gross-Up Payment”) such that the net amount retained by such Covered Employee, after deduction of any Excise Tax on the Change of Control Benefits and the Other Benefits, and any federal, state and local income tax and Excise Tax upon the payment provided for by this Section 2.4, shall be equal to the Change of Control Benefits and the Other Benefits.

 
5

 

For purposes of determining whether any of the Change of Control Benefits or the Other Benefits will be subject to the Excise Tax and the amount of such Excise Tax:

(1)      any payments or benefits received or to be received by such Covered Employee in connection with a change in control of the Employer or such Covered Employee’s Separation from Service (whether pursuant to the terms of the Plan or any other plan, arrangement or agreement with the Employer, any person whose actions result in change in control or any person affiliated with the Employer or such persons) shall be treated as “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, and all “excess parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax, except to the extent that, in the opinion of tax counsel selected by the Board, such payments or benefits (in whole or in part) do not constitute parachute payments, or such excess payments (in whole or in part) represent reasonable compensation for services actually rendered within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code,

(2)      the amount of the Change of Control Benefits and the Other Benefits that shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax shall be equal to the lesser of (A) the total amount of the Change of Control Benefits and the Other Benefits or (B) the amount of excess parachute payments within the meaning of Sections 280G(b)(1) and (4) (after applying subparagraph (1) above), and

(3)      the value of any non-cash benefits or any deferred payment or benefit shall be determined by  tax counsel, selected by the Board, in accordance with the principles of Sections 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code.

For purposes of determining the amount of the Gross-Up Payment, such Covered Employee shall be deemed to pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income taxation in the calendar year in which the Gross-Up Payment is to be made and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rates of taxation in the state and locality of the such Covered Employee’s residence on the date of separation, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes.  In the event that the Excise Tax is subsequently determined to be less than the amount taken into account hereunder at the time of such Covered Employee’s Separation from Service, such Covered Employee shall repay to the Employer at that time that amount of such reduction in Excise Tax as is finally determined to be the portion of the Gross-Up Payment attributable to such reduction plus interest on the amount of such repayment at the rate provided in Section 1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code.  In the event that the Excise Tax is determined to exceed the amount taken into account hereunder at the time of such Covered Employee’s Separation from Service (including by reason of any payment the existence or amount of which cannot be determined at the time of the Gross-Up Payment), the Employer shall make an additional gross-up payment to such Covered Employee in respect of such excess (plus any interest payable with respect to such excess) at the time that the amount of such excess is finally determined.

Any payment to be made to a Covered Employee pursuant to this Section 2.4 shall be made within thirty (30) days after such Covered Employee remits the related taxes.

2.5            Six-Month Lookback Alternate Benefits .   Any provision of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, if during the six-month period immediately prior to a Change of Control a Covered Employee was employed by the Employer in a job category or position that would provide greater benefits under the Plan than would be provided under the Plan for such Covered Employee with respect to his or her job category or position with the Employer immediately prior to such Change of Control, then in lieu of the benefits applicable under the Plan to such Covered Employee’s job category or position with the Employer immediately prior to such Change of Control, such Covered Employee shall be entitled to receive under the Plan the benefits under the Plan that apply to such Covered Employee’s job category or position with the Employer during the six-month period immediately prior to such Change of Control that provides the greatest benefits to such Covered Employee.

 
6

 
 
ARTICLE III.

ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN
 
3.1            Committee’s Powers and Duties.   It shall be a principal duty of the Committee to see that the Plan is carried out, in accordance with its terms, for the exclusive benefit of persons entitled to participate in the Plan.  The Committee shall be the Plan’s named fiduciary and shall have full power to administer the Plan in all of its details, subject to applicable requirements of law.  For this purpose, the Committee’s powers shall include, but not be limited to, the following authority, in addition to all other powers provided by the Plan:
 
(a)           to make and enforce such rules and regulations as it deems necessary or proper for the efficient administration of the Plan;

(b)           to interpret the Plan, its interpretation thereof to be final and conclusive on all persons claiming benefits under the Plan;

(c)           to decide all questions concerning the Plan and the eligibility of any person to participate in the Plan;

(d)           to make determination as to the right of any person to a benefit under the Plan (including, without limitation, to determine whether and when there has been a termination of a Covered Employee’s employment and the cause of such termination);

(e)           to appoint such agents, counsel, accountants, consultants, claims administrators and other persons as may be required to assist in administering the Plan;

(f)           to allocate and delegate its responsibilities under the Plan and to designate other persons to carry out any of its responsibilities under the Plan, any such allocation, delegation or designation to be in writing;

(g)           to sue or cause suit to be brought in the name of the Plan; and

(h)           to obtain from the Employer and from the Covered Employees such information as is necessary for the proper administration of the Plan.

3.2            Member’s Own Participation.   No member of the Committee may act, vote, or otherwise influence a decision of the Committee specifically relating to himself or herself as a participant in the Plan.

3.3            Indemnification .   The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of   the Committee against any and all expenses and liabilities arising out of his or her administrative functions or fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the Plan, including any expenses and liabilities that are caused by or result from an act or omission constituting the negligence of such member in the performance of such functions or responsibilities, but excluding expenses and liabilities that are caused by or result from such member’s own gross negligence or willful misconduct.  Expenses against which such member shall be indemnified hereunder shall include, without limitation, the amounts of any settlement or judgment, costs, counsel fees, and related charges reasonably incurred in connection with a claim asserted or a proceeding brought or settlement thereof.

3.4            Compensation, Bond and Expenses .   The members of the Committee shall not receive compensation for their services as members of the Committee.  To the extent required by applicable law, but not otherwise, Committee members shall furnish bond or security for the performance of their duties hereunder. Any expenses properly incurred by the Committee incident to the administration, termination or protection of the Plan, including the cost of furnishing bond, shall be paid by the Company.

 
7

 

3.5            Claims Procedure .  A Covered Employee that the Committee determines is entitled to a benefit under the Plan is not required to file a claim for such benefit.  A Covered Employee who is not paid a Plan benefit and who believes that he or she is   entitled to such benefit, or who has been paid a Plan benefit and   who believes that he or she is entitled to a greater benefit, shall file a written claim for such benefit with   the Committee no later than sixty (60) days after such Covered Employee’s Payment Date.  In any case in which a claim for a Plan benefit is submitted by a Covered Employee, the   Committee shall furnish written notice to the claimant within sixty (60) days (or within 120 days if additional information requested by the Committee necessitates an extension of the sixty-day period), which notice shall:

(a)           state the specific reason or reasons for the denial or modification;

(b)           provide specific references to pertinent Plan provisions on which the denial or modification is based;

(c)           provide a description of any additional material or information necessary for the Covered Employee or his or her representative to perfect the claim, and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; and

(d)           explain the Plan’s claim review procedure as contained herein.

In the event a claim for a Plan benefit is denied or modified, if the Covered Employee or his or her representative desires to have such denial or modification reviewed, he or she must, within sixty (60) days following receipt of the notice of such denial or modification, submit a written request for review by the Committee of its initial decision. In connection with such request, the Covered Employee or his or her representative may review any pertinent documents upon which such denial or modification was based and may submit issues and comments in writing.  Within sixty (60) days following such request for review, the Committee shall, after providing a full and fair review, render its final decision in writing to the Covered Employee and his or her representative, if any, stating specific reasons for such decision and making specific references to pertinent Plan provisions upon which the decision is based.  If special circumstances require an extension of such sixty-day period, the Committee’s decision shall be rendered as soon as possible, but not later than 120 days after receipt of the request for review.  If an extension of time for review is required, written notice of the extension shall be furnished to the Covered Employee and his or her representative, if any, prior to the commencement of the extension period.

3.6            Mandatory Arbitration .   If a Covered Employee or his or her representative is not satisfied with the decision of the Committee pursuant to the Plan’s claims review procedure, such Covered Employee or his or her representative may, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the written decision of the Committee, request by written notice to the Committee that his or her claim be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the employee benefit plan claims arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association.  Such arbitration shall be the sole and exclusive procedure available to a Covered Employee or his or her representative for review of a decision of the Committee.  In reviewing the decision of the Committee, the arbitrator shall use the standard of review that would be used by a Federal court in reviewing such decision under the provisions of ERISA.  The Covered Employee or his or her representative and the Employer shall share equally the cost of such arbitration, including but not limited to the fees of the arbitrator and reasonable attorneys’ fees, unless the arbitrator determines otherwise.  The arbitrator’s decision shall be final and legally binding on both parties.  Judgment upon the arbitrator’s decision may be entered in any court of appropriate jurisdiction, and may not be challenged in any court, either at the place of arbitration or elsewhere.  This Section shall be governed by the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act.
 
 
ARTICLE IV.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

4.1            Funding.   The benefits provided under the Plan shall be unfunded and shall be provided from the Employer’s general assets.

 
8

 
 
4.2            Cost of Plan.   The entire cost of the Plan shall be borne by the Employer and no contributions shall be required of the Covered Employees.
 
4.3            Plan Year.   The Plan shall operate on a plan year consisting of the twelve consecutive month period commencing on January 1 of each year.

4.4            Other Participating Employers.   With the written consent of the Committee, any entity or organization eligible by law to participate in the Plan may adopt the Plan and become a participating Employer hereunder by executing and delivering a written instrument evidencing such adoption to the Secretary of the Company.  Such written instrument shall specify the effective date of the adoption of the Plan by such adopting Employer, may incorporate specific provisions relating to the operation of the Plan which apply to the adopting Employer only, and shall become, as to such adopting Employer and its employees, a part of the Plan.  Each adopting Employer shall be conclusively presumed to have agreed to be bound by the terms of the Plan as amended from time to time.  The provisions of the Plan shall be applicable with respect to each Employer separately, and amounts payable hereunder shall be paid by the Employer which employs the particular Covered Employee.

4.5            Amendment and Termination .
 
(a)           Prior to a Change of Control, the Plan may be amended or modified in any respect and may be terminated, on behalf of all Employers, by resolution adopted by the Board; provided, however, that:
 
(1)           no such amendment, modification or  termination  which  would  adversely affect the benefits or protections provided under the Plan to any individual who is a Covered Employee on the date such amendment, modification or termination is adopted shall be effective as it relates to such individual unless no Change of Control occurs within one year after such adoption, and any such attempted amendment, modification or termination adopted within one year prior to a Change of Control shall be null and void ab initio as it relates to such individual (it being understood that the removal of a Covered Employee from participation in the Plan shall, for the purposes of this Section, constitute an adverse affect to the benefits or protections provided under the Plan to any Covered Employee so removed); and
 
(2)           the Plan may not be amended, modified or terminated (i) at the request of a third party who has indicated an intention or taken steps to effect a Change of Control, or who effectuates a Change of Control, or (ii) in connection with, or in anticipation of, a Change of Control which actually occurs, if such amendment, modification or termination would adversely affect the benefits or protections provided under the Plan to any individual who is a Covered Employee on the date such amendment, modification or termination is adopted, and in either case, any such attempted amendment, modification or termination shall be null and void ab initio as it relates to such individual.  Any action taken to amend, modify or terminate the Plan that is taken after the execution of an agreement providing for a transaction or transactions that, if consummated, would constitute a Change of Control, shall conclusively be presumed to have been taken in connection with a Change of Control.
 
(b)           Upon and after the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Plan may not be amended or modified in any manner which would adversely affect the benefits or protections provided under the Plan to any individual who is a Covered Employee on the date the Change of Control occurred, and any such attempted amendment, modification or termination shall be null and void ab initio as it relates to such individual.
 
(c)           Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.5, if any compensation or benefit provided by the Plan may result in being subject to the tax imposed by Section 409A of the Code, the Board may modify the Plan as necessary or appropriate in the best interests of the Covered Employees (1) to exclude such compensation or benefit from being deferred compensation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, or (2) to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and its related Code provisions (and the rules, regulations and other regulatory guidance relating thereto); provided, however, that no amendment made pursuant to the provisions of this Section 4.5(c) shall reduce the value of the compensation or benefits that would be payable to a Covered Employee in connection with his or her Involuntary  Termination following a Change of Control without the written consent of such Covered Employee.
 

 
9

 
 
4.6            No Contract of Employment .   The adoption and maintenance of the Plan shall not be deemed to be a contract of employment between the Employer and any person or to be consideration for the employment of any person.  Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to give any person the right to be retained in the employ of the Employer or to restrict the right of the Employer to discharge any person at any time nor shall the Plan be deemed to give the Employer the right to require any person to remain in the employ of the Employer or to restrict any person’s right to terminate his or her employment at any time.

4.7            Severability .   Any provision in the Plan that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction by reason of applicable law shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating or affecting the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.

4.8            Nonalienation .   A Covered Employee shall have no right or ability to pledge, hypothecate, anticipate, assign or otherwise transfer any benefit, interest or right under the Plan, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and no benefit, interest or right of a Covered Employee under the Plan shall be liable for or subject to any debt, obligation or liability of such Covered Employee.

4.9            Effect of Plan .   The Plan and the Noble Energy, Inc. Change of Control Severance Plan are intended to supersede (a) the Change of Control Severance Plan adopted by the Board on October 23, 2001, as amended (the “Superseded Plan”), and (b) all oral or written policies of the Employer and all oral or written communications to Covered Employees with respect to the subject matter of the Plan that were written or communicated prior to the Effective Date, and the Superseded Plan and all such prior policies or communications are hereby null and void and of no further force and effect.  The Plan shall be binding upon the Employer and any successor of the Employer, by merger or otherwise, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Covered Employees.  In addition, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, all rights of a Covered Employee to eligibility and participation under the Plan shall vest and shall be considered a contract right enforceable against the Employer and any successors thereto, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

4.10            Code Section 409A Compliance .   The Plan is intended to provide compensation and benefits that are not subject to the tax imposed under Section 409A of the Code, and shall be interpreted and administered to the extent possible in accordance with such intent.

4.11            Governing Law.   The Plan shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas (without giving effect to any choice-of-law rules that may require the application of the laws of another jurisdiction), except to the extent preempted by federal law.
 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan has been executed by the Company on this 18th day of December , 200 7 , to be effective as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ Charles D. Davidson  
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer  
       



 
10

 
 

 
SCHEDULE A FOR THE
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
FOR EXECUTIVES

The Applicable Factor for the Chief Executive Officer is 2.99 , the Applicable Factor for a Senior Executive is 2.5 , and the Applicable Factor for a Key Executive is 2.0 .

The period of months specified for Welfare Benefit Coverages for the purposes of Section 2.1(e) are:  twenty-four (24) months for a Key Executive; thirty (30) months for a Senior Executive; and thirty-six (36) months for the Chief Executive Officer.

A Covered Employee employed by the Employer in one of the following positions is a Senior Executive :
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
General Counsel
Senior Vice President

A Covered Employee employed by the Employer in one of the following positions is a Key Executive :
Vice President, Human Resources
Vice President, Northern Region
Vice President, Operations Services
Vice President, Southern Region



This Schedule A has been executed on this ___ day of ___________________, 200____, to be effective as of January 1, 2008.

 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
   
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer  
       



 

 

 
 
11


 
EXHIBIT 10.41



NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT
 
THIS CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), made and entered into by and between NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”), and ______________________ (“Executive”),
 
WITNESSETH THAT:
 
WHEREAS, Employer and Executive entered into a Change of Control Agreement effective as of ________________ (the “Prior Agreement”); and
 
WHEREAS, Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Prior Agreement to make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Employer and Executive hereby amend the Prior Agreement by restatement in its entirety effective as of January 1, 2008, to read as follows:
 
RECITALS
 
The Board of Directors of Employer (the “Board”) has determined that it is in the best interests of Employer to assure that Employer will have the continued dedication of Executive, notwithstanding the possibility, threat or occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below).  The Board believes it is imperative to diminish the inevitable distraction of Executive by virtue of the personal uncertainties and risks created by a pending or threatened Change of Control, to encourage Executive’s full attention and dedication to Employer currently and in the event of any threatened or pending Change of Control, and to provide Executive with compensation and benefit arrangements upon a Separation Event (as defined below) that ensure that such compensation and benefits are competitive with other corporations.
 
AGREEMENT
 
In consideration of Executive’s continued employment by Employer, as well as the promises, covenants and obligations contained herein, Employer and Executive agree as follows:
 
1.            Payment of Severance Amount .  Subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, upon the occurrence of a Separation Event with respect to Executive, Employer shall:
 
(a)           pay to Executive when due under Employer’s normal payroll practices all unpaid salary due to, and unreimbursed expenses incurred by, Executive in the performance of his duties for Employer through the Separation Date (as defined below);
 
(b)           pay Executive an amount equal to Executive’s Annual Cash Compensation (as defined in paragraph 2) multiplied by a factor of _________________, payable as a lump sum cash payment within 30 days following the Separation Date;
 
(c)           pay Executive an amount equal to Executive’s pro-rata (measured as (i) the number of days expired, as of the Separation Date, in the then-current calendar year, divided by (ii) 365) target bonus for the then-current year within 30 days following the Separation Date;
 
(d)           provide Executive with life, disability, medical and dental insurance at the level provided at either the date of the occurrence of a Change of Control or the Separation Date, as Executive shall in his sole discretion elect by providing written notice to Employer, for _____________________________ months following the Separation Date or such shorter period until Executive shall obtain substantially equivalent i nsurance coverage from a subsequent employer, if any, in the same manner as if Executive’s Separation from Service (as defined below) had not occurred until the end of such period.  Executive shall immediately notify Employer upon obtaining any insurance from a subsequent employer and shall provide all information required by Employer regarding such insurance to enable Employer to make a determination of whether such insurance is substantially equivalent;
 

 
1

 
 
(e)           notwithstanding Executive’s Separation from Service, preserve Executive’s rights to purchase the shares of Employer’s capital stock that are subject to then-outstanding options that have been granted to Executive by Employer (or pursuant to a stock option plan of Employer), so that all such options remain or become exercisable in accordance with their terms as if Executive’s Separation from Service had not occurred; and
 
(f)           within 30 days after receiving a detailed invoice for same, reimburse Executive, up to a maximum cumulative amount of   Dollars, for the reasonable fees of no more than __________ out-placement (or similar) service provider [(s)] engaged by Executive to assist in finding employment opportunities for Executive during the twelve-month period following the Separation Date.  All reimbursements to be made pursuant to this paragraph 1(f) shall be made to Executive no later than the end of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which Executive’s Separation Date occurs.
 
2.            Definitions .
 
(a)           A “ Separation Event ” shall be deemed to have occurred if Employer or any successor thereto causes Executive’s involuntary Separation from Service (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(n)) at any time within 24 months after a Change of Control for any reason other than (A) Cause (as defined below), or (B) incapacity due to physical or mental illness.  In addition, Employer shall be deemed to have caused Executive’s involuntary Separation from Service if Executive’s Separation from Service occurs following a Constructive Separation Event (as defined below).
 
(b)           A “ Change of Control ” shall be deemed to have occurred if:
 
(i)           individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by Employer’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of this Agreement, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board;
 
(ii)           the stockholders of Employer shall approve a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of Employer immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own outstanding voting securities representing at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Voting Securities”) of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company;
 
(iii)           the stockholders of Employer shall approve a liquidation or dissolution of Employer or a sale of all or substantially all of the stock or assets of Employer; or
 
(iv)           any “person,” as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than Employer, any of its subsidiaries, any employee benefit plan of Employer or any of its subsidiaries, or any entity organized, appointed or established by Employer for or pursuant to the terms of such a plan), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) of such person (as well as any “Person” or “group” as those terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), shall become the “beneficial owner” or “beneficial owners” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of Employer representing in the aggregate twenty-five percent (25%) or more of either (A) the then outstanding shares of common stock, par value $3.33 per share, of Employer (“Common Stock”) or (B) the Voting Securities of Employer, in either such case other than solely as a result of acquisitions of such securities directly from Employer.  Without limiting the foregoing, a person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, or to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, Common Stock or other Voting Securities of Employer shall be deemed the beneficial owner of such Common Stock or Voting Securities.
 

 
2

 

 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change of Control” of Employer shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of subparagraph (iv) of this paragraph 2(b) solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by Employer which, by reducing the number of shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of Employer outstanding, increases (i) the proportionate number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or (ii) the proportionate voting power represented by the Voting Securities of Employer beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if any person referred to in clause (i) or (ii) of this sentence shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of Employer (other than a result of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction), then a Change of Control of Employer shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes of subparagraph (iv) of this paragraph 2(b).
 
(c)           “ Annual Cash Compensation ” shall, as determined on the Separation Date, be equal to the sum of (i) plus (ii), where “(i)” equals Executive’s annualized salary in effect on the date of the earliest Change of Control to occur during the 18-month period prior to the Separation Date, and “(ii)” equals the greater of (A) Executive’s annual target bonus for the then-current bonus period and (B) the average annual bonus paid or payable by Employer to Executive for the three-year period (or for the period of Executive’s employment, if Executive has not been employed for all of such three-year period) immediately preceding the date of the Change of Control.
 
(d)           For purposes of this Agreement, “ Cause ” shall mean (i) the willful and continued failure by Executive to perform his duties as ____________________ of Employer or any of its subsidiaries or his continued failure to perform duties reasonably requested or reasonably prescribed by the Board (other than as a result of Executive’s death or disability), (ii) the engaging by Executive in conduct that is materially monetarily injurious to Employer or any of its subsidiaries, (iii) gross negligence or willful misconduct by Executive in the performance of his duties that results in, or causes, material monetary harm to Employer or any of its subsidiaries, or (iv) Executive’s commission of a felony or other civil or criminal offense involving moral turpitude.  In the case of (i), (ii) and (iii) above, a finding of Cause for separation shall be made only after reasonable notice to Executive and an opportunity for Executive, together with counsel, to be heard before the Board.  A determination of Cause by the Board shall be effective only if agreed upon by a majority of the directors.
 
(e)           “ Code ” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
(f)           A “ Constructive Separation Event ” shall be deemed to have occurred if Employer:
 
(i)           demotes Executive to a lesser position, in title or responsibility, as compared to the highest position held by him with Employer at the earlier of the occurrence of a Change of Control or the date on which a tentative agreement is reached by Employer, or a public announcement is made, regarding a proposed Change of Control that ultimately occurs;
 
(ii)           decreases Executive’s total annual compensation ( i.e., the sum of his annual salary, his target bonus under Employer’s annual incentive bonus plan or similar plan in effect at the applicable time and the value of other employment benefits provided to Executive by Employer) below the level in effect at the earlier of the occurrence of a Change of Control or the date on which a tentative agreement is reached by Employer, or a public announcement is made, regarding a proposed Change of Control that ultimately occurs; provided, however, that a decrease in total annual compensation that results solely from an amendment or termination of any employee or group or other executive benefit plan, which amendment or termination is applicable to all executives of Employer, shall not constitute a Constructive Separation Event; or
 

 
3

 

 
(iii)           requires or requests Executive to relocate to a principal office more than 50 miles from the principal office at which Executive is employed immediately prior to a Change of Control; provided, however, that such a requirement or request for a relocation shall constitute a Constructive Separation Event only if made in connection with, and within 12 months after consummation of, the event or transaction that constitutes (or the approval of which constitutes) the Change of Control, and such 12-month period shall apply, for purposes of determining whether an event specified in this clause (iii) constitutes a Separation Event, in lieu of the 24-month period specified in paragraph 2(a).  For purposes of this clause (iii), it shall be presumed (and Employer shall have the burden of proof to overcome such presumption) that a requirement or request for a relocation is “in connection with” such an event or transaction if it is made within the 12-month period specified in this clause (iii).
 
(g)            “Separation from Service” shall mean, with respect to Executive, Executive’s separation from service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder) with the group of employers that includes Employer and each Affiliated Company.  An employee’s Separation from Service shall be deemed to occur on the date as of which the employee and his or her employer reasonably anticipate that no further services will be performed after such date or that the level of bona fide services the employee will perform after such date (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) will permanently decrease to no more than 20 percent (20%) of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period of services to the employer if the employee has been providing services to the employer less than 36 months).
 
(h)            “Affiliated Company” shall mean any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than Employer, that along with Employer is considered a single employer under Section 414(b) or 414(c) of the Code; provided, however, that (i) in applying Section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Code for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Section 414(b) of the Code, the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Code, and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Section 414(c) of the Code, the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.
 
(i)           A “Specified Employee” shall mean a specified employee within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2) of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.  Each Specified Employee will be identified by the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board as of each December 31, using such definition of compensation permissible under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-1(i)(2) as said Committee shall determine in its discretion, and each Specified Employee so identified shall be treated as a Specified Employee for the purposes of this Agreement for the entire 12-month period beginning on the April 1 following a December 31 Specified Employee identification date.
 
(j)            “Separation Date” shall mean the date of the occurrence of a Separation Event with respect to Executive.
 
3.            Gross Up Payment .  In the event that (i) Executive becomes entitled to the payment and benefits provided under paragraph 1 of this Agreement (the “Change of Control Payment”) and any of the Change of Control Payment will be subject to the tax (the “Excise Tax”) imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or any successor provision, or (ii) any payments or benefits received or to be received by Executive pursuant to the terms of any other plan, arrangement or agreement (the “Benefit Payments”) will be subject to the Excise Tax, Employer shall pay to Executive an additional amount (the “Gross-Up Payment”) such that the net amount retained by Executive, after deduction of any Excise Tax on the Change of Control Payment and the Benefit Payments, and any federal, state and local income tax and Excise Tax upon the payment provided for by this paragraph 3, shall be equal to the Change of Control Payment and the Benefit Payments.
 

 
4

 

For purposes of determining whether any of the Change of Control Payment or the Benefit Payments will be subject to the Excise Tax and the amount of such Excise Tax:
 
(i)           any payments or benefits received or to be received by Executive in connection with a change in control of Employer or Executive’s Separation from Service (whether pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or any other plan, arrangement or agreement with Employer, any person whose actions result in change in control or any person affiliated with Employer or such persons) shall be treated as “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, and all “excess parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax, except to the extent that, in the opinion of tax counsel selected by the Board, such payments or benefits (in whole or in part) do not constitute parachute payments, or such excess payments (in whole or in part) represent reasonable compensation for services actually rendered within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code,
 
(ii)           the amount of the Change of Control Payment and the Benefit Payments that shall be treated as subject to the Excise Tax shall be equal to the lesser of (A) the total amount of the Change of Control Payment and the Benefits Payments or (B) the amount of excess parachute payments within the meaning of Sections 280G(b)(1) and (4) (after applying clause (i), above), and
 
(iii)           the value of any non-cash benefits or any deferred payment or benefit shall be determined by  tax counsel, selected by the Board, in accordance with the principles of Sections 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code.
 
For purposes of determining the amount of the Gross-Up Payment, Executive shall be deemed to pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income taxation in the calendar year in which the Gross-Up Payment is to be made and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rates of taxation in the state and locality of Executive’s residence on the date of separation, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes.  In the event that the Excise Tax is subsequently determined to be less than the amount taken into account hereunder at the time of Executive’s Separation from Service, Executive shall repay to Employer at that time that amount of such reduction in Excise Tax as is finally determined to be the portion of the Gross-Up Payment attributable to such reduction plus interest on the amount of such repayment at the rate provided in Section 1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code.  In the event that the Excise Tax is determined to exceed the amount taken into account hereunder at the time of Executive’s Separation from Service (including by reason of any payment the existence or amount of which cannot be determined at the time of the Gross-Up Payment), Employer shall make an additional gross-up payment to Executive in respect of such excess (plus any interest payable with respect to such excess) at the time that the amount of such excess is finally determined.
 
Any payment to be made to Executive pursuant to this paragraph 3 shall be made within 30 days after Executive remits the related taxes.
 
4.            Payment Delay for Specified Employees . Any provision of this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding,   if Executive is a Specified Employee on Executive’s Separation Date, then any payment to be made to Executive pursuant paragraph 1(b) or 1(c) of this Agreement shall be made on the first business day that is six (6) months after Executive’s Separation Date (or if earlier, within 30 days after the date of Executive’s death).
 
5.            Notices .  For purposes of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or when mailed by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, (i) if to Employer, then addressed to its principal business office, to the attention of the corporate Secretary of Employer, and (ii) if to Executive, to his or her residence address as reflected in Employer’s records (or to such other address as either party may furnish to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of changes of address shall be effective only upon receipt).
 
6.            Applicable Law .  This contract is entered into under, and shall be governed for all purposes by, the internal laws of the State of Texas, without regard to principles of conflicts of law requiring the application of the law of another State.
 

 
5

 

7.            Severability .  If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, then the invalidity or unenforceability of that provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
 
8.            Counterparts .  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.
 
9.            Withholding of Taxes .  Employer may withhold from any benefits payable under this Agreement all federal, state, city or other taxes as may be required pursuant to any law or governmental regulation or ruling.
 
10.            No Employment Agreement .  Nothing in this Agreement shall give Executive any rights (or impose any obligations) to continued employment by Employer or any subsidiary thereof or successor thereto, nor shall it give Employer any rights (or impose any obligations) with respect to continued performance of duties by Executive for Employer or any subsidiary thereof or successor thereto.
 
11.            Payment Authority .  Any officer of Employer (other than Executive) is authorized to issue and execute a check, initiate a wire transfer or otherwise effect payment on behalf of Employer to satisfy Employer’s obligations to pay all amounts due to Executive under this Agreement.
 
12.            Assignment .
 
(a)           This Agreement is personal in nature and neither of the parties hereto shall, without the consent of the other, assign or transfer this Agreement or any rights or obligations hereunder, except as provided in the remainder of this paragraph 12.  Without limiting the foregoing, Executive’s right to receive payments hereunder shall not be assignable or transferable, whether by pledge, creation of a security interest or otherwise, other than a transfer by his will or by the laws of descent or distribution, and in the event of any attempted assignment or transfer contrary to this paragraph 12 Employer shall have no liability to pay any amount so attempted to be assigned or transferred.  This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Executive’s personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees.
 
(b)           Employer may:  (i) as long as it remains obligated   with respect to this Agreement, cause its obligations hereunder to be performed by a subsidiary or subsidiaries for which Executive performs services, in whole or in part; (ii) assign this Agreement and its rights hereunder in whole, but not in part, to any party with or into which it may hereafter merge or consolidate or to which it may transfer all or substantially all of its assets, if said party shall by operation of law or expressly in writing assume to the reasonable satisfaction of Executive all liabilities of Employer hereunder as fully as if it had been originally named Employer herein; but may not otherwise assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder.  Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Employer’s successors and assigns.
 
(c)           The provisions of this paragraph 12 shall not prohibit or restrict the assignment or transfer by Executive of any otherwise assignable or transferable right of Executive to purchase the shares of Employer’s capital stock that are subject to any outstanding option that has been granted to Executive by Employer (or pursuant to a stock option plan of Employer).
 
13.            Release and Full Settlement .  Any provision of this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, as a condition to the receipt of any payment hereunder upon the occurrence of a Separation Event, Executive shall first execute a release, in such reasonable form as may be approved by the Board, releasing the Board, Employer and Employer’s affiliates, stockholders, officers, directors, employees and agents from any and all claims and from any and all causes of action of any kind or character, including but not limited to all claims or causes of action arising out of Executive’s employment with Employer or Executive’s Separation from Service, and the performance of Employer’s obligations hereunder and the receipt by Executive of the payments provided hereunder shall constitute full settlement of all such claims and causes of   action.
 

 
6

 

14.            Modifications .  This Agreement shall not be varied, altered, modified, canceled, changed or in any way amended except by mutual agreement of the parties in a written instrument executed by the parties hereto or their legal representatives.
 
15.            Dispute Procedure and Arbitration .   Any dispute arising in connection with this Agreement shall be resolved as follows:
 
(a)           If Executive believes that he has been denied any payment or benefit he is entitled to receive under this Agreement, within 60 days following such denial Executive shall file a written claim for such denied payment or benefit with the President of Employer (the “President”).  Such written claim shall detail the arguments and attach copies of the documents that support Executive’s claim for the denied payment or benefit.  Within 30 days after the receipt of such written claim, the President shall review such claim and notify Executive as to whether he is entitled to such payment or benefit.  Such a notification from the President shall be in writing and, if denying Executive’s claim for such payment or benefit, shall set forth the specific reason or reasons for the denial and make specific reference to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement.
 
(b)           Any dispute arising in connection with this Agreement that is not resolved to the satisfaction of Executive pursuant to the procedure provided for in paragraph 15(a) above, shall be finally resolved by arbitration in Houston, Texas, governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and conducted pursuant to and in accordance with the National Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes of the American Arbitration Association.  Either Employer or Executive may request arbitration by sending written notice to the other party.  In any such arbitration, the only issues to be considered and determined by the arbitrator(s) shall be issues pertaining to legal and equitable rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and any applicable law.  A decision and award of the arbitrator(s) shall be final, and may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof, and application may be made to such court for judicial acceptance and/or an order enforcing such decision and/or award.  Judicial review of any decision or award shall be in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act, except that review of any award of punitive or exemplary damages shall be conducted as if the award of such damages were made by a jury sitting in a federal district court in Houston, Texas.  In the event the arbitrator(s) determine there is a prevailing party in the arbitration, the prevailing party shall recover from the losing party all costs of arbitration, including but not limited to the fees of the arbitrator(s) and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the prevailing party.  The provisions of this paragraph 15(b) shall not be construed to limit or to preclude either party from bringing an action in any court of competent jurisdiction for injunctive relief.
 
16.            Interpretation .  This Agreement is intended to provide compensation and benefits that are not subject to the tax imposed under Section 409A of the Code and shall be interpreted to the extent possible in accordance with such intent.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on this ___ day of _______________, 200____, to be effective as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
   
    Name:  
    Title:    
       
 


 



 
7




 

EXHIBIT 10.42



NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

THIS PLAN, made and executed at Houston, Texas, by Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
 
WITNESSETH THAT:

WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore established the Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan to provide incentive compensation opportunities for key employees of the Company and its affiliates; and
 
WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.2 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, the Plan is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 

ARTICLE I
Purpose of the Plan

The purpose of the Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide incentive compensation opportunities for key employees of the Company and its affiliates.  Participants in the Plan will have the opportunity to receive incentive compensation based upon the attainment of specific performance goals established by the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of Noble Energy, Inc.


ARTICLE II
Definitions

When used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

2.1            “Affiliate” means any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Section 414(b) or Section 414(c) of the Code ; provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase  “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.

2.2           “Award” means an incentive compensation award under the Plan.

2.3           “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.4           “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 
1

 

2.5           “Common Stock” means common stock, par value $3.33⅓ per share, of the Company.

2.6           “Company” means Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.7           “Committee” means the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors.

2.8           “Participant” means any employee of the Company or an Affiliate who is designated by the Committee as eligible to receive an Award.

2.9           “Performance Goals” means the performance goals established by the Committee for a Performance Period pursuant to the Plan.

2.10           “Performance Period” means the three-year period commencing January 1, 2004, and the three-year period commencing on the first day of each calendar year commencing after 2004.

2.11           “Plan” means this Noble Energy, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan.


ARTICLE III
Eligibility

3.1           The officers and other employees of the Company or an Affiliate that the Committee in its discretion determines are key employees may be designated by the Committee as Participants in the Plan for a particular Performance Period.  Only those employees of the Company or an Affiliate who are designated by the Committee as Participants for a particular Performance Period will participate in the Plan for that Performance Period.


ARTICLE IV
Administration, Amendment and Termination of the Plan

4.1           The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have the right and authority in its discretion to (i) adopt, amend or rescind administrative and interpretive rules and regulations relating to the Plan, (ii) construe the Plan, (iii) make all determinations necessary or appropriate for administering the Plan, and (iv) exercise all of the powers conferred on the Committee under the Plan.  The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan in the manner and to the extent the Committee shall deem proper to carry out the intent and purposes of the Plan.  The determinations made and the action taken by the Committee pursuant to the Plan shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties having or claiming to have an interest under the Plan or any Award.

4.2           The Committee shall have the exclusive authority to amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time.


ARTICLE V
Determination of Performance Goals and Awards
5.1           Within the first 90 days of each Performance Period the Committee in its discretion shall (i) designate the Participants who will participate in the Plan for such Performance Period, (ii) establish the Performance Goals (and any specific performance targets with respect thereto) for such Performance Period, and (iii) grant the Awards for the Participants who will participate in the Plan for such Performance Period.

 
2

 

5.2           The Performance Goals established by the Committee for a Performance Period may be based on (i) price, earnings or cash flow per share of stock, (ii) gross revenues or net profits, (iii) total shareholder returns, (iv) growth in reserves or production, (v) finding and development costs, (vi) operating costs, or (vii) other objective performance measurements or goals acceptable to the Committee.  The Performance Goals may be based on the performance of the Company itself or in relation to its peers, or on the performance of a particular Participant, division, department, subsidiary or other unit to which a particular Participant is assigned.  In establishing the Performance Goals for a Performance Period, the Committee may establish different Performance Goals for individual Participants or groups of Participants, and the Performance Goals may be weighted to reflect their relative significance to the Company for the Performance Period.

5.3           Awards may be made by the Committee in the form of stock options or restricted stock granted or awarded under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, or in the form of performance units or other incentive measurements providing for the payment of bonuses in cash, or in any combination thereof as determined by the Committee in its discretion.

5.4           As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing the level of attainment of the Performance Goals for such Performance Period, and shall approve the payments to be made or other action to be taken with respect to the Awards for such Performance Period.  Awards shall be subject to all applicable withholding requirements for federal, state and local taxes.

5.5           Any provision of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, (i) in no event shall the total number of shares of Common Stock for which stock options may be granted or which may be awarded as restricted stock to any Participant pursuant to the Plan exceed the limitations applicable to such grants and awards under the Noble Energy, Inc. 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as amended from time to time, and (ii) the maximum amount that may be paid in cash to any Participant under an Award for a Performance Period shall not exceed $4,000,000.


ARTICLE VI
Limitation of Rights
6.1           The establishment of the Plan shall not enlarge or otherwise affect the terms of any Participant’s employment with the Company or an Affiliate, and the Company or such Affiliate may terminate the employment of any Participant as freely and with the same effect as if the Plan had not been adopted.


ARTICLE VII
Miscellaneous
7.1           The Plan is an unfunded plan of incentive compensation, and no Participant shall have any right to or lien on any asset of the Company or an Affiliate by reason of or with respect to any Award made under the Plan.

7.2           No member of the Committee shall be liable for any act, omission, or determination taken or made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award made hereunder, and the members of the Committee shall be entitled to indemnification, defense and reimbursement by the Company in respect of any claim, loss, damage, or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising therefrom to the full extent permitted by law and under any directors’ and officers’ liability or similar insurance coverage or indemnification agreement that may be in effect from time to time.

7.3           The laws of the State of Texas (excluding its principles relating to conflicts of laws) shall govern the Plan.

7.4           The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and shall be interpreted and administered accordingly.

 
3

 


7.5           The Plan was adopted by the Committee effective for the Performance Period commencing on January 1, 2004, and certain provisions of the Plan were approved by the stockholders of the Company at the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company held on April 27, 2004.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Plan has been executed this 18th day of December , 200 7, to be effective as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ Charles D. Davidson  
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer  
       

 
4


 
EXHIBIT 10.43



AMENDMENT TO THE
2006 PERFORMANCE UNITS AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into by and between NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and (“Employee”),
 
WITNESSETH THAT :

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have heretofore entered into a Performance Units Agreement dated February 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”); and
 
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now desire to amend the Agreement to make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Company and Executive hereby amend the Agreement effective as of January 1, 2008, in the following respects only:
 
FIRST :  Section 1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 
(a)           “Affiliate” means any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Code section 414(b) or Code section 414(c); provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase  “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.
 
SECOND :  Section 1(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 
(c)           A “Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of either a change in the ownership of the Company, a change in the effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets, as described in subsection (1), (2) or (3) below, or any combination of said events.
 
(1)           A change of ownership of the Company occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (as defined in Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B)) acquires ownership of the stock of the Company that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company.  However, if any person, or more than one person acting as a group is considered to own more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or persons is not considered to cause a change in the ownership of the Company (or to cause a change in the effective control of the Company within the meaning of subsection (2) of this Section).  An increase in the percentage of stock owned by any one person, or persons acting as a group, as a result of a transaction in which the Company acquires its stock in exchange for property will be treated as an acquisition of stock for purposes of this subsection.  This subsection applies only when there is a transfer of stock of the Company (or issuance of stock of the Company) and the stock of the Company remains outstanding after the transaction.
 

 
1

 

(2)            A change in the effective control of the Company occurs only on the date that either:
 
(i)           Any one person, or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of stock of the Company possessing 30 percent or more of the total voting power of the stock of the Company; or
 
(ii)           A majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of such Board of Directors prior to the date of the appointment or election.
 
(3)            A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to more than 40 percent of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions.  For this purpose, “gross fair market value” means the value of the assets of the Company, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.  A transfer of assets by the Company will not be treated as a change in the ownership of such assets if the assets are transferred to:
 
(i)           A shareholder of the Company (immediately before the asset transfer) in exchange for or with respect to its stock;
 
(ii)           An entity, 50 percent or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company;
 
(iii)           A person, or more than one person acting as a group, that owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the total value or voting power of all the outstanding stock of the Company; or
 
(iv)           An entity, at least 50 percent of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a person described in (iii) above.
 
For an event to constitute a Change in Control of the Company with respect to  Employee the Company must be (a) the corporation for whom Employee is providing services at the time of the Change in Control; (b) the corporation that is liable for payment in respect of a Performance Unit but only if either the payment is attributable to the performance of service by Employee for the corporation or there is a bona fide business purpose for the corporation to be liable for the payment and, in either case, no significant purpose of making the corporation liable for the payment is the avoidance of Federal income tax; or (c) a corporation that is a majority shareholder, meaning a shareholder owning more than 50 percent of the total fair market value and total voting power, of a corporation identified in (a) or (b) or any corporation in a chain of corporations in which each corporation is a majority shareholder of another corporation in the chain ending in a corporation identified in (a) or (b).
 
THIRD :  Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby further amended to add a new definition at the end of Section 1 to read as follows:
 
(l)             “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
FOURTH :  Section 6(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 

 
2

 

(e)             If a Change in Control occurs during the Performance Period and while Employee is employed by the Company or an Affiliate, then any provision of this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in lieu of and in full satisfaction and discharge of all of the obligations of the Company to make payments to or with respect to Employee pursuant to this Agreement, as soon as practicable (but in no event later than 60 days) after the occurrence of such Change in Control the Company or its successor shall pay to Employee an amount in cash equal to one dollar ($1.00) for each Performance Unit awarded to Employee pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement.  If a Change in Control occurs after the end of the Performance Period but prior to the July 31 immediately following the end of such period, the payment based on actual performance that is otherwise due to be paid pursuant to this Section 6 shall be paid to Employee (or in the event of Employee’s death, to Employee’s estate) as soon as practicable after the occurrence of such Change in Control (but in no event later than July 31 following the end of such Performance Period).
 
FIFTH :  The Agreement is hereby amended to add a new Section at the end thereof to read as follows:
 
19.             Compliance with Code Section 409A .  The compensation payable by the Company to Employee pursuant to this Agreement is intended to be compensation that is not subject to the tax imposed by Code section 409A, and this Agreement shall be administered and construed to the fullest extent possible to reflect and implement such intent.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed on this ___ day of ______________________, 200___, to be effective as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
   
    Name:  
    Title:  
       
 
  EMPLOYEE  
       
 
By:
   
    Name:   
    Title:  
       



 
3


 
EXHIBIT 10.44
 

 
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 
THIS PLAN, made and executed by NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
 
WITNESSETH THAT:
 
WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore established the Noble Energy, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Company and its participating affiliates; and
 
WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to separate the portion of the Plan applicable to amounts deferred and vested prior to January 1, 2005, from the portion of the Plan applicable to amounts deferred or vested after December 31, 2004, and to make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.1 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, the portion of the Plan applicable to amounts deferred or vested after December 31, 2004 (which shall be known as the Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan), is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 
ARTICLE 1
 
Definitions
 
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, when used in this Plan:
 
1.1        “Account” shall mean the account or accounts established by an Employer for a Participant pursuant to the Plan.
 
1.2        “Administrator” shall mean the Employee Benefits Committee or such other person or persons appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company to administer the Plan pursuant to Article 11 of the Plan.
 
1.3       “Affiliated Company” shall mean any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Code section 414(b) or Code section 414(c ) ; provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.
 
1.4        “Applicable Employer” shall mean the Employer that employs or last employed a Participant.
 
1.5        “Base Salary” shall mean the annual base salary payable to a Participant by an Employer or Affiliated Company excluding incentive and discretionary bonuses and other non-regular forms of compensation, before reductions for contributions to or deferrals under any pension, deferred compensation or benefit plan sponsored by an Employer or Affiliated Company.

 
1

 

 
1.6        “Beneficiary” shall mean the person(s) or entity designated as such in accordance with Article 10 of the Plan.
 
1.7       “Bonus” shall mean amounts paid to the Participant by an Employer or Affiliated Company under the Company’s Short Term Incentive Plan or any other bonus designated by the Administrator before reductions for contributions to or deferrals under any pension, deferred compensation or benefit plan sponsored by an Employer or Affiliated Company.
 
1.8        A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if:
 
  (a)      individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the Board of Directors of the Company, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of this Plan, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board;

  (b)      the stockholders of the Company shall approve a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own outstanding voting securities representing at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Voting Securities”) of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company;

  (c)      the stockholders of the Company shall approve a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the stock or assets of the Company; or
 
  (d)      any “person,” as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any of its subsidiaries, any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any entity organized, appointed or established by the Company for or pursuant to the terms of such a plan), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) of such person (as well as any “Person” or “group” as those terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), shall become the “beneficial owner” or “beneficial owners” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing in the aggregate twenty-five percent (25%) or more of either (1) the then outstanding shares of common stock, par value $3.33-1/3 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) or (2) the Voting Securities of the Company, in either such case other than solely as a result of acquisitions of such securities directly from the Company.  Without limiting the foregoing, a person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, or to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company shall be deemed the beneficial owner of such Common Stock or Voting Securities.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change in Control” of the Company shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of subparagraph (d) of this Section 1.8 solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company outstanding, increases (i) the proportionate number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or (ii) the proportionate voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if any person referred to in clause (i) or (ii) of this sentence shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company (other than a result of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction), then a Change in Control of the Company shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes subparagraph (d) of this Section 1.8.

 
2

 

1.9        “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
1.10      “Company” shall mean Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
1.11      “Compensation Committee” shall mean the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
 
1.12      “Crediting Rate” shall mean an effective annual yield equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the 120-month rolling average of 10-year Treasury Notes, or (ii) the 120-month rolling average of the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal on the first business day of each month.  The Crediting Rate shall be determined annually by the Administrator as of the September preceding the beginning of the Plan Year to which such rate shall apply and shall be compounded monthly.
 
1.13      “Disability” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, that the Participant is (i) unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three (3) months under an accident and health plan covering employees of an Employer or Affiliated Company.
 
1.14      “Election Period” shall mean, with respect to a Plan Year, the period prior to the beginning of such year that is specified by the Administrator for the making of deferral elections for such year pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 of the Plan.  The term “Election Period” shall also include the 30-day election period provided for under Section 2.3 of the Plan.
 
1.15      “Eligible Employee” shall mean, with respect to a Plan Year, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and any other employee of  an Employer who has been designated by the Chief Executive Officer as an Eligible Employee for such year for the purposes of this Plan.
 
1.16      “Employer” shall include the Company and any Affiliated Company that has adopted both the Qualified Plan and this Plan.
 
1.17      “ERISA” shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
 
1.18      “Financial Hardship” shall mean a severe financial hardship to a Participant resulting from an illness or accident of the Participant, the Participant’s spouse, the Participant’s beneficiary, or the Participant’s dependent (as defined in Code section 152, without regard to Code section 152(b)(1), (b)(2) and (d)(1)(B)), the loss of the Participant’s property due to casualty (including the need to rebuild a home following damage to a home not otherwise covered by insurance), or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant that cannot be relieved (i) through reimbursement or compensation from insurance or otherwise, (ii) by liquidation of the Participant’s assets, to the extent that such liquidation would not cause severe financial hardship, or (iii) by cessation of deferrals under the Plan.  A financial need arising from a foreseeable event such as the purchase of a home or the payment of education expenses for children shall not be considered to be a Financial Hardship.
 
1.19      “Participant” shall mean an employee or former employee of an Employer for whom an Account is being maintained under the Plan.
 
1.20      “Participant Election Form” shall mean the form or forms prescribed by the Administrator which, when completed and submitted by a Participant to the Administrator in accordance with the provisions of the Plan, constitute a written agreement to make a deferral and elect a form of distribution under the Plan.  The Participant Election Form may take the form of one or more electronic communications in accordance with such procedures as may be prescribed by the Administrator.
 
 
 
3

 
 
1.21       “Plan” shall mean this Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan as in effect from time to time.
 
1.22      “Plan Year” shall mean the calendar year.
 
1.23      “Qualified Plan” shall mean the Noble Energy, Inc. Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan as amended from time to time.
 
1.24      “Retirement” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, such Participant’s Separation from Service on or after his or her Retirement Eligibility Date for any reason other than Disability or death.
 
1.25      “Retirement Eligibility Date” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, the earlier of (i) the date on which such Participant attains age sixty-five (65), or (ii) the date on which such Participant has both attained age fifty-five (55) and completed at least five (5) Years of Service.
 
1.26      “Scheduled Withdrawal” shall mean a distribution elected by a Participant pursuant to Article 7 of the Plan.
 
1.27      “Separation from Service” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, such Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Code section 409A and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder) with the group of employers that includes the Company and each Affiliated Company.  An employee’s Separation from Service shall be deemed to occur on the date as of which the employee and his or her employer reasonably anticipate that no further services will be performed after such date or that the level of bona fide services the employee will perform after such date (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) will permanently decrease to no more than 20 percent of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period of services to the employer if the employee has been providing services to the employer less than 36 months).
 
1.28      “Settlement Date” shall mean the date on which a lump sum payment will be made, or the date on which an installment distribution will commence being made, to or with respect to a Participant.  A Participant’s Settlement Date shall be (i) for a benefit payable from such Participant’s Participant Deferral Account or Employer Matching Contribution Account upon his or her Retirement or Disability, the date such benefit is to be paid or commence being paid under the election made by such Participant on his or her Participant Election Form in effect with respect to the Plan, and (ii) for all benefit distributions to be made in connection with a Participant’s Separation from Service that are not described in the immediately preceding clause (i), the date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after such Separation from Service; provided, however, that the Settlement Date that would otherwise apply with respect to a benefit to be paid to a Participant who is a Specified Employee shall be postponed to the earlier of (i) the first business day that is six (6) months after the date of his or her Separation from Service, or (ii) a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the date of such Participant’s death following his or her Separation from Service.
 
1.29      “Specified Employee” shall mean a Participant who is a specified employee within the meaning of Code section 409A(a)(2) and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.  Each Specified Employee will be identified by the Compensation Committee as of each December 31, using such definition of compensation permissible under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-1(i)(2) as the Compensation Committee shall determine in its discretion, and each Specified Employee so identified shall be treated as a Specified Employee for the purposes of this Plan for the entire 12-month period beginning on the April 1 following a December 31 Specified Employee identification date.
 
1.30      “Statutory Limitations” shall mean the annual addition, contribution and compensation limitations applicable to plans qualified under Code section 401(a).
 
1.31      “Valuation Date” shall mean the date specified by the Administrator that is no more than sixty (60) days preceding the date a payment is to be made pursuant to the Plan.
 
1.32       “Years of Service” shall mean the cumulative consecutive years of continuous full-time employment with an Employer or Affiliated Company, beginning on the date the Participant first began service with an Employer or Affiliated Company, and counting each anniversary thereof.  Transfers of employment between and among Employers and Affiliated Companies shall not be an interruption of continuous employment with an Employer or Affiliated Company for the purposes of this Plan.
 
4

 
 
 
ARTICLE 2
 
Participation
 
2.1       Participants .  Each Eligible Employee shall become a Participant in this Plan upon electing to make a Base Salary or Bonus deferral pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Plan.  In addition, if the amount of the Employer profit sharing contribution for a Plan Year that would have been made to the Qualified Plan for an employee of an Employer who is not an Eligible Employee is less than the amount that such contribution would have been if the Qualified Plan had been administered without regard to the Statutory Limitations, such employee shall become a Participant (but not an Eligible Employee) in this Plan as of the last day of such year.
 
2.2       Elective Deferrals .  Subject to such conditions, limitations and procedures as the Administrator may prescribe from time to time for the purposes of the Plan, during the Election Period for a Plan Year an Eligible Employee may elect to have the payment of (i) any whole percentage up to fifty percent (50%) of the Base Salary otherwise payable to the Eligible Employee for services performed during such year, and (ii) any whole percentage up to one hundred percent (100%) of the Bonus otherwise payable to such Eligible Employee for services performed during such year, deferred for future payment in accordance with the provisions of the Plan.  An election made during an Election Period pursuant to this Section 2.2 (i) shall be made in such written or electronic form as may be prescribed by the Administrator, (ii) may be revoked or otherwise changed during  such Election Period, and (iii) shall be irrevocable after the end of such Election Period.  If a Participant ceases to be an Eligible Employee during a Plan Year, such Participant shall continue to be a Participant in the Plan and  his or her Base Salary and/or Bonus deferral elections for such Plan Year shall remain in effect for the remainder of such year (including with respect to any Base Salary and/or Bonus otherwise payable by an Affiliated Company for the remainder of such year), but such Participant may not make additional deferrals under the Plan after the end of such year unless the Participant again becomes an Eligible Employee.
 
2.3       Participant Election Forms .  In order to make a deferral for a Plan Year, an Eligible Employee   must submit a Participant Election Form to the Administrator during the Election Period applicable to such year.  Such Participant Election Form shall specify the percentage of Base Salary and/or Bonus to be deferred for such year and the time and form of payment for any Scheduled Withdrawal to be made with respect to the Base Salary and/or Bonus amounts to be deferred for such year.  Such Participant Election Form shall also specify the time and form of payment for the Participant’s Retirement benefit under the Plan if such time and form of payment have not already been specified for the purposes of the Plan (in which event, such time and form of payment can only be changed in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.1 of the Plan).  If an individual who is not already a Participant becomes an Eligible Employee for the first time during a Plan Year, such Eligible Employee may make the elections referred to in Section 2.2 of the Plan within thirty (30) days after the date he or she first becomes an Eligible Employee; provided, however, that the Base Salary and/or Bonus deferral elections so made shall be irrevocable after the end of said 30-day period and shall apply only to the Base Salary and/or Bonus amounts otherwise payable to such Eligible Employee for services performed after the end of said 30-day period.  A Participant shall be required to submit a new Participant Election Form on a timely basis in order to defer a percentage of Bonus or to change his or her deferral election with respect to Base Salary for a subsequent Plan Year.  If no Participant Election Form is filed during the Election Period for such subsequent year, the Participant’s election regarding deferral of Base Salary for the immediately preceding Plan Year shall continue in force for such subsequent year.  However, no election regarding Bonus shall be applied to a subsequent Plan Year.
 
 
ARTICLE 3
 
Accounts
 
3.1        Participant Deferral Accounts .  Solely for recordkeeping purposes one or more Participant Deferral Accounts (segregated based on form and time of payment) shall be maintained for each Participant and shall be credited with the deferrals made by such Participant pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Plan.  Amounts credited to a Participant’s Participant Deferral Account shall be fully vested at all times and shall be deemed to be credited with notional earnings at the Crediting Rate from the date credited to the Account through the Valuation Date.
 

 
5

 

3.2       Employ er Matching Contribution Accounts .  For each Plan Year in which a Participant makes a deferral pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Plan and makes either (i) the maximum amount elective deferrals to the Qualified Plan permitted under Code section 402(g), or (ii) the maximum amount elective contributions to the Qualified Plan permitted under the terms of the Qualified Plan, such Participant’s Employer Matching Contribution Account shall be credited with an amount equal to the amount by which (i) the amount of Employer matching contributions that would have been made to the Qualified Plan for such Participant for such year if the deferrals made by such Participant for such year pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Plan had been contributed to the Qualified Plan and the Qualified Plan was administered without regard to the Statutory Limitations, exceeds (ii) the amount of Employer matching contributions, if any, actually credited or to be credited to such Participant under the Qualified Plan for such Plan Year.  The amount to be credited to a Participant’s Employer Matching Contribution Account for a Plan Year shall be credited to such Account as of the last day of such year.  Amounts credited to a Participant’s Employer Matching Contribution Account shall vest at the same time and under the same conditions as such amounts would have vested under the Qualified Plan had such contributions been made to the Qualified Plan, and shall be deemed to be credited with notional earnings at the Crediting Rate from the date credited to such Account through the Valuation Date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Change in Control, all amounts credited to a Participant’s Employer Matching Contribution Account (including notional earnings thereon) shall be fully vested.
 
3.3       Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Accounts .  For each Plan Year for which an Employer makes a profit sharing contribution to the Qualified Plan for a Participant, such Participant’s Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account shall be credited with an amount equal to the amount by which (i) the amount of the Employer profit sharing contribution that would have been made to the Qualified Plan for such Participant for such year if the Qualified Plan had been administered without regard to the Statutory Limitations, exceeds (ii) the amount of the Employer profit sharing contribution actually credited or to be credited to such Participant under Qualified Plan for such year.  The amount to be credited to a Participant’s Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account for a Plan Year shall be credited to such Account as of the last day of such year.  Amounts credited to a Participant’s Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account shall vest at the same time and under the same conditions as such amounts would have vested under the Qualified Plan had such contributions been made to the Qualified Plan, and shall be deemed to be credited with notional earnings at the Crediting Rate from the date credited to such Account through the Valuation Date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Change of Control, all amounts credited to a Participant’s Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account (including notional earnings thereon) shall be fully vested.
 
3.4       Statement of Accounts .  The Administrator shall provide each Participant with statements at least annually setting forth the Participant’s Account balances as of the end of each year.
 
ARTICLE 4
 
Benefits
 
4.1       Retirement Benefit .  In the event of the Participant’s Retirement, the Participant shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the total balance of the Participant’s Accounts credited with notional earnings as provided in Article 3 of the Plan through the Valuation Date.  The benefit payable under this Section 4.1 from a Participant’s Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account shall be paid to such Participant in the form of a single lump sum payment on his or her Settlement Date.  The benefit payable pursuant to this Section 4.1 from a Participant’s Participant Deferral Account or Employer Matching Contribution Account (i) shall be paid to such Participant in the form of a single lump sum payment, or in the form of annual installments over a period of not more than fifteen (15) years, as elected by such Participant in his or her Participant Election Form in effect with respect to the Plan, and (ii) shall be paid or commence being paid, as the case may be, on such Participant’s Settlement Date.  For the purposes of this Section 4.1, a distribution election (and any subsequent change with respect to the form or time of payment of a benefit pursuant to this Section 4.1) shall be made by a Participant on his or her Participant Election Form; provided, however, that except for a transition period election made on or before December 31, 2008 pursuant to Section 4.3 of the Plan, once a distribution election has been made by a Participant, no subsequent change with respect to an elected time or form of payment to be made pursuant to this Section 4.1 shall become effective for the purposes of the Plan (i) until a date that is at least twelve (12) months after the date of the filing of such change, (ii) unless the date for the payment or commencement of payments being changed is at least five (5) years after the date as of which such Participant’s benefit would otherwise have been paid or commenced being paid under this Section 4.1 in the absence of such change, and (iii) unless such change is filed with or as directed by the Administrator not less than twelve (12) months before the date the payment being changed is scheduled to be paid or commence being paid.
 

 
6

 

4.2       Termination Benefit .  Upon a Participant’s Separation from Service for a reason other than Retirement, Disability or death, the Applicable Employer shall pay to the Participant a termination benefit equal to the total vested balance of the Participant’s Accounts credited with notional earnings as provided in Article 3 of the Plan through the Valuation Date.  Such termination benefit shall be paid in a single lump sum payment on the Participant’s Settlement Date.  Any amount credited to a Participant’s Employer Matching Contribution Account or Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account that is not vested at the time of such Participant’s Separation from Service shall be forfeited by such Participant.
 
4.3       409A Transition Period Election .  Subject to such conditions, limitations and procedures as the Administrator may prescribe, on or before December 31, 2008, a Participant may make new distribution elections with respect to the time and/or the form for the payment of his or her benefits under the Plan, provided that each such election complies with the transition relief requirements for changing a payment election as promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service in Notice 2007-86 (or in any other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service).
 
ARTICLE 5
 
Death Benefits
 
5.1       Survivor Benefit Before Settlement Date .  If a Participant dies prior to his or her Settlement Date, the Applicable Employer shall pay to the Participant’s Beneficiary a death benefit equal to the total balance of all of the Participant’s Accounts credited with notional earnings as provided in Article 3 of the Plan through the Valuation Date.  Such death benefit shall be paid in a single lump sum payment on the Participant’s Settlement Date.
 
5.2       Survivor Benefit After Settlement Date .  If a Participant dies on or after his or her Settlement Date, any remaining benefits that would have been payable under the Plan to such Participant if living shall be paid by the Applicable Employer to the Participant’s Beneficiary at the same time and in the same manner as such benefits would have been paid to the Participant if living.
 
 
ARTICLE 6
 
Disability
 
6.1       Disability .  Upon a Participant’s Separation from Service by reason of Disability, the amounts credited to such Participant’s Accounts shall be distributed in the form and at the time applicable to a benefit payable under the provisions of Section 4.1 of the Plan.
 
 
ARTICLE 7
 
Scheduled Withdrawal
 
7.1       Election .  A Participant may make an irrevocable election on his or her Participant Election Form at the time of making an election to defer Base Salary or Bonus to take a Scheduled Withdrawal from an Account to be established for such Participant for such purpose, including any earnings credited thereon.  Such Participant may elect to receive the Scheduled Withdrawal in any Plan Year that begins at least two (2) years after the end of the Election Period in which such Scheduled Withdrawal is elected, and may elect to have the Scheduled Withdrawal distributed over a period of up to four (4) years .   The Participant may irrevocably elect to make additional deferrals into such Scheduled Withdrawal Account in subsequent Participant Election Forms that are effective for Plan Years before the Plan Year in which the Scheduled Withdrawal is to be made or commence being made, but may not elect another Scheduled Withdrawal date or establish another Scheduled Withdrawal Account until all of the amounts in the existing Scheduled Withdrawal Account have been paid out.  No Scheduled Withdrawal shall be available from an Employer Matching Contribution Account or an Employer Profit Sharing Contribution Account.

 
7

 

7.2       Ma ximum Scheduled Withdrawal .  A Participant shall be entitled to elect a Scheduled Withdrawal of any whole percentage up to one hundred percent (100%) of the relevant deferral credited with notional earnings as provided in Article 3 of the Plan through the Valuation Date.
 
7.3       Timing of Scheduled Withdrawal .  A Participant’s Scheduled Withdrawal shall be paid by the Applicable Employer to such Participant in the form elected beginning on the last day of January of the Plan Year elected by such Participant in his or her Participant Election Form unless such date is preceded by such Participant’s Separation from Service.  In the event of a Participant’s Separation from Service prior to the date elected for the Scheduled Withdrawal, the distribution of the remaining amount credited to such Participant’s Scheduled Withdrawal Account shall be paid to or with respect to such Participant in a single lump sum payment on the Participant’s Settlement Date.
 
 
ARTICLE 8
 
Financial Hardship
 
8.1       Financial Hardship .  If the Administrator determines that a Participant has incurred a Financial Hardship during a Plan Year, or if a Participant receives a hardship distribution from the Qualified Plan during a Plan Year, the Administrator shall cancel the remaining portion of any Base Salary and Bonus deferral elections made by such Participant under the Plan for such year.  In addition, if the Administrator determines that a Participant has incurred a Financial Hardship, the Administrator in its sole discretion may distribute to such Participant from his or her vested Accounts the amount reasonably necessary to satisfy the Financial Hardship need (which amount may include the amounts necessary to pay any federal, state, local or foreign income taxes or penalties reasonably anticipated to result from the distribution).  The determination of the amount reasonably necessary to satisfy the Financial Hardship need shall take into account any additional compensation that is available to the Participant from any cancellation of his or her deferral elections under the Plan.  If a Participant’s deferral elections under the Plan are canceled or a Participant receives a Financial Hardship distribution pursuant to the provisions of this Section, such Participant shall not be allowed to make a new deferral election under the Plan until the Election Period for the second Plan Year that begins after the date of such cancellation.  No distribution shall be made to a Participant pursuant to this Section unless (i) such Participant’s Financial Hardship is an “unforeseeable emergency” within the meaning of Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(i)(3), and (ii) such Participant requests such a distribution in writing and provides to the Administrator with such information and documentation with respect to his or her Financial Hardship as may be requested by the Administrator.
 
 
ARTICLE 9
 
Amendment and Termination of Plan
 
9.1       Amendment or Termination of Plan .  At any time prior to a Change in Control, the Board of Directors of the Company may amend or terminate the Plan, provided, however, that without the prior written consent of such Participant (or, if deceased, his or her Beneficiary), (i) no such amendment shall reduce the Crediting Rate applicable to a Participant’s Account balance or installment distribution, (ii) no such amendment or termination may reduce or further defer the payment of a Participant’s Account balance or installment distribution, and (iii) no such amendment or termination shall accelerate the time for the payment of a Participant’s Account Balance or installment distribution in a manner that subjects such benefit to the tax imposed under Code section 409A.  During the twenty-four (24) month period following a Change in Control, no amendment or termination of the Plan shall become effective with respect to a Participant or Beneficiary of a deceased Participant without the prior written consent of such Participant or Beneficiary.  After the twenty-four (24) month period following a Change in Control, the Board of Directors of the Company shall have the same right to amend or terminate the Plan as such Board had prior to such Change in Control.

 
8

 
ARTICLE 10
 
Beneficiaries
 
10.1       Beneficiary Designation .  A Participant shall have the right at any time to designate any individual or individuals as Beneficiary (both primary and contingent) to whom payment under the Plan shall be made in the event of the Participant’s death.  A Participant’s Beneficiary designation shall be effective when submitted to the Administrator during the Participant’s lifetime in such form and in accordance with such procedures as may be prescribed by the Administrator.
 
10.2       Revision of Designation .  A Participant's submission of a new Beneficiary designation shall cancel all prior Beneficiary designations made by such Participant.  Any finalized divorce or marriage (other than a common law marriage) of a Participant subsequent to the date of a Beneficiary designation shall revoke such designation, unless in the case of divorce the former spouse was not designated as Beneficiary and unless in the case of marriage such Participant's new spouse has been designated as Beneficiary.
 
10.3       Successor Beneficiary .  If the primary Beneficiary of a deceased Participant dies prior to complete distribution of the benefits otherwise distributable to him or her under the provisions of the Plan, the remaining benefits payable with respect to such deceased Participant shall be distributed to such Participant’s contingent Beneficiary when otherwise due under the provisions of the Plan.
 
10.4       Absence of Valid Designation .  If a Participant fails to designate a Beneficiary as provided above, or if the Beneficiary designation is revoked by marriage, divorce, or otherwise without execution of a new designation, or if every person designated as Beneficiary predeceases the Participant or dies prior to complete distribution of the deceased Participant’s Account balances, then the remaining balances shall be distributed to such Participant’s estate when otherwise due under the Plan.
 
 
ARTICLE 11
 
Administration/Claims Procedures
 
11.1       Administration .  The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator, which shall have the exclusive right and full discretion to (i) interpret the Plan, (ii) decide any and all matters arising hereunder (including the right to remedy possible ambiguities, inconsistencies, or admissions), (iii) to make, amend and rescind such rules as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan, and (iv) to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan, including determinations regarding eligibility for benefits payable under the Plan. All interpretations and determinations of the Administrator with respect to Plan matters shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons affected thereby.  No person or member of any committee acting as the Administrator shall be liable for any determination, decision or action made or taken in good faith with respect to the Plan.  
 
11.2       Claims Procedure .  Any Participant, former Participant or Beneficiary may file a written claim with the Administrator setting forth the nature of the benefit claimed, the amount thereof, and the basis for claiming entitlement to such benefit.  The Administrator shall determine the validity of the claim and communicate a decision to the claimant promptly and, in any event, not later than ninety (90) days after receipt of the claim by the Administrator.  The claim may be deemed by the claimant to have been denied for purposes of further review described below in the event a decision is not furnished to the claimant within such ninety (90) day period.  If additional information is necessary to make a determination on a claim, the claimant shall be advised of the need for such additional information within forty-five (45) days after the date of the claim.  The claimant shall have up to one hundred and eighty (180) days to supplement the claim information, and the claimant shall be advised of the decision on the claim within forty-five (45) days after the earlier of the date the supplemental information is supplied or the end of the one hundred and eighty (180) day period.  Every claim for benefits which is denied shall be denied by written notice setting forth in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant (i) the specific reason or reasons for the denial, (ii) specific reference to any provisions of the Plan (including any internal rules, guidelines, protocols, criteria, etc.) on which the denial is based, (iii) description of any additional material or information that is necessary to process the claim, and (iv) an explanation of the procedure for further reviewing the denial of the claim (including applicable time limits and a statement of the claimant’s right to bring an action following an adverse determination on review).
 

 
9

 

11.3       Review Procedures .  Within sixty (60) days after the receipt of a denial on a claim, a claimant or his/her authorized representative may file a written request for review of such denial.  Such review shall be undertaken by the Administrator and shall be a full and fair review. The claimant shall have the right to review all pertinent documents.  The Administrator shall issue a decision not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of a request for review from a claimant unless special circumstances, such as the need to hold a hearing, require a longer period of time, in which case a decision shall be rendered as soon as possible but not later than one hundred and twenty (120) days after receipt of the claimant’s request for review.  The decision on review shall be in writing and shall include specific reasons for the decision written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant with specific reference to any provisions of the Plan on which the decision is based.
 
 
ARTICLE 12
 
Conditions Related to Benefits
 
12.1       Nature of Plan and Rights .  This Plan is unfunded and maintained by the Employers primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Employers.  The Accounts established and maintained under this Plan by an Employer are for its accounting purposes only, and shall not be deemed or construed to create a trust fund or security interest of any kind for or to grant a property interest of any kind to any Participant, Beneficiary or estate.  The amounts credited to Accounts maintained under this Plan by an Employer are and for all purposes shall continue to be a part of the general liabilities of such Employer, and to the extent that a Participant, Beneficiary or estate acquires a right to receive a payment from an Employer pursuant to this Plan, (i) such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of such Employer, and (ii) such Participant, Beneficiary or estate shall have no claim against or right to receive any payment hereunder from any other Employer.
 
12.2       Spendthrift Provision .  No Account balance or other right or interest under the Plan of a Participant, Beneficiary or estate may be assigned, transferred or alienated, in whole or in part, either directly or by operation of law (except pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order within the meaning of Code section 414(p)), and no such balance, right or interest shall be liable for or subject to any debt, obligation or liability of such Participant, Beneficiary or estate.
 
12.3       Protective Provisions .  The Participant shall cooperate with the Applicable Employer by furnishing any and all information requested by the Administrator in order to facilitate the payment of benefits hereunder, taking such physical examinations as the Administrator may deem necessary and taking such other actions as may be requested by the Administrator.  
 
12.4       Withholding .  A Participant or Beneficiary shall make appropriate arrangements with the Applicable Employer for satisfaction of any federal, state or local income, employment or other tax withholding requirements applicable to the payment of benefits under the Plan.  If no other arrangements are made, the Applicable Employer may provide, at its discretion, for such withholding and tax payments as may be required, including, without limitation, by the reduction of Plan benefits or other amounts payable to the Participant or Beneficiary.
 
 
ARTICLE 13
 
Miscellaneous
 
13.1       Successors of the Company .  The rights and obligations of an Applicable Employer under the Plan shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the successors and assigns of such Applicable Employer.
 
13.2       Employment Not Guaranteed .  Nothing contained in the Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as a contract of employment or as giving any Participant any right to continued employment with any Employer.
 

 
10

 

13.3       Gender, Singular and Plural .  All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neuter, as the identity of the person or persons may require.  As the context may require, the singular may be read as the plural and the plural as the singular.
 
13.4       Captions .  The captions of the articles, paragraphs and sections of the Plan are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any of its provisions.
 
13.5       Validity .  In the event any provision of the Plan is held invalid, void or unenforceable, the same shall not affect, in any respect whatsoever, the validity of any other provisions of the Plan.
 
13.6       Waiver of Breach .  The waiver by an Employer of any breach of any provision of the Plan shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by that Participant or any other Participant.
 
13.7       Notice .  Any notice required or permitted to be given under the Plan to an Employer, the Administrator or a Participant or Beneficiary shall be sufficient if in writing and hand-delivered, or sent by registered or certified mail, (i) in the case of an Employer, to the principal office of such Employer, (ii) in the case of the Administrator, to the principal office of the Company, directed to the attention of the Administrator, and (iii) in the case of a Participant or Beneficiary, to the last known address of the Participant or Beneficiary as indicated on the records of the Administrator.  Such notice shall be deemed given as of the date of delivery or, if delivery is made by mail, as of the date shown on the postmark on the receipt for registration or certification.  Notices may also be given by electronic means in accordance with procedures established by the Administrator.
 
13.8       Errors in Benefit Statement or Distributions .  In the event an error is made in a Plan benefit statement, such error shall be corrected on the next benefit statement following the date such error is discovered.  In the event of an error in a distribution, the error shall be corrected at such time and in such manner as the Applicable Employer shall determine in its sole discretion.  If the remaining balance of a Participant’s Account is insufficient to cover an erroneous overpayment, the Applicable Employer in its sole discretion may offset other amounts payable to the Participant (including but not limited to salary, bonuses, expense reimbursements, severance benefits or other employee compensation benefit arrangements, as allowed by law) to recoup the amount of such overpayment.
 
13.9       Special Distributions .  Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the Administrator in its absolute discretion may direct an Employer to accelerate the time for the making of a payment under this Plan to or with respect to a Participant to the extent that such acceleration is a permitted exception under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(j)(4) (or other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service) that does not subject such accelerated payment to the tax imposed by Code section 409A.
 
13.10         C ompliance with Code Section 409A  The compensation payable by an Employer to or with respect to a Participant pursuant to this Plan is intended to be compensation that is not subject to the tax imposed by Code section 409A, and the Plan shall be administered and construed to the fullest extent possible to reflect and implement such intent.
 
13.11         Applicable Law .  The Plan shall be governed and construed in accordance with the internal laws (and not the principles relating to conflicts of laws) of the State of Texas, except where superseded by ERISA or other applicable federal law.
 
13.12         Arbitration .  Any claim, dispute or other matter in question of any kind relating to this Plan which is not resolved by the claims procedures under Article 11 of the Plan shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the applicable Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the American Arbitration Association.  Notice of demand for arbitration shall be made in writing to the opposing party and to the American Arbitration Association within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen.  In no event shall a demand for arbitration be made after the date when the applicable statute of limitations   would bar the institution of a legal or equitable proceeding based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question.  The decision of the arbitrators shall be final and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.  The arbitrators may award reasonable fees and expenses to the prevailing party in any dispute hereunder and shall award reasonable fees and expenses in the event that the arbitrators find that the losing party acted in bad faith or with intent to harass, hinder or delay the prevailing party in   the exercise of its rights in connection with the matter under dispute.
 

 
11

 

13.3       Administrator Release and Indemnity .  The Employers (i) hereby release each person or member of a committee acting as the Administrator from any claim, cost, expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses of defense), judgment, loss or liability (including any amount paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Company) incurred by an Employer, and (ii) shall joint and severally indemnify and hold each person or member of a committee acting as the Administrator harmless from and against any claim, cost, expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses of defense), judgment, loss or liability (including any amount paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Company) incurred by such person or committee member, that arises out of or results from any act or omission to act (including a negligent act or omission to act) by such person or committee member relating to the performance of his or her duties under the Plan, excluding, however, any such claim, cost, expense, judgment, loss or liability that arises out of or results from his or her willful misconduct or failure to act in good faith.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Plan to be executed on this 18th day of December, 200 7 , to be effective as of January 1, 2008.
 
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ Charles D. Davidson  
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer  
       
 
 

 
12

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.45



NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
RETIREMENT RESTORATION PLAN
 
THIS RETIREMENT RESTORATION PLAN, made and executed at Houston, Texas, by NOBLE ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
 
WITNESSETH THAT:
 
WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore established the Restoration of Retirement Income Plan for Certain Participants in the Noble Affiliates Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Company and its participating affiliates; and
 
WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to change its name and make certain changes designed to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and pursuant to the provisions of Section 7 of the Plan, effective as of December 1, 2007, the Plan as in effect on November 30, 2007, is hereby renamed the “Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Restoration Plan” and amended by restatement in its entirety to read as follows:
 
Section 1.   Definitions .  Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, when used in this Plan:
 
(a)           “Affiliated Company” means any incorporated or unincorporated trade or business or other entity or person, other than the Company, that along with the Company is considered a single employer under Code section 414(b) or Code section 414(c); provided, however, that (i) in applying Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3) for the purposes of determining a controlled group of corporations under Code section 414(b), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 80 percent” appears in Code section 1563(a)(1), (2), and (3), and (ii) in applying Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2 for the purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for the purposes of Code section 414(c), the phrase “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of the phrase “at least 80 percent” in each place the phrase “at least 50 percent” appears in Treas. Reg. section 1.414(c)-2.
 
(b)           A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if:
 
(1)           individuals who, as of December 1, 2007, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the Board of Directors of the Company, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of this Agreement, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board;
 
(2)           the stockholders of the Company shall approve a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own outstanding voting securities representing at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Voting Securities”) of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company;
 

 
1

 

(3)           the stockholders of the Company shall approve a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all of the stock or assets of the Company; or
 
(4)           any “person,” as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any of its subsidiaries, any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any entity organized, appointed or established by the Company for or pursuant to the terms of such a plan), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) of such person (as well as any “Person” or “group” as those terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), shall become the “beneficial owner” or “beneficial owners” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing in the aggregate twenty-five percent (25%) or more of either (A) the then outstanding shares of common stock, par value $3.33-1/3 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) or (B) the Voting Securities of the Company, in either such case other than solely as a result of acquisitions of such securities directly from the Company.  Without limiting the foregoing, a person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, or to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company shall be deemed the beneficial owner of such Common Stock or Voting Securities.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change in Control” of the Company shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of subparagraph (4) of this Plan Section 1(b) solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company outstanding, increases (i) the proportionate number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or (ii) the proportionate voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company beneficially owned by any person to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if any person referred to in clause (i) or (ii) of this sentence shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities of the Company (other than a result of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction), then a Change in Control of the Company shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes subparagraph (4) of this Plan Section 1(b).
 
(c)           “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
(d)           “Committee” means the Company’s Employee Benefits Committee.
 
(e)           “Company” means Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
(f)           “Compensation Committee” means the Compensation, Benefits and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
 
(g)            “Disabled” means, with respect to a Participant, that the Participant is considered to be totally and permanently disabled within the meaning and for the purposes of the Retirement Plan.
 
(h)           “Employer” includes the Company and any other Affiliated Company that has adopted both the Retirement Plan and this Plan.
 
(i)           “Participant” means an individual who (i) is or was a participant in the Retirement Plan, and (ii) satisfies one or more of the following requirements:  (1) was a participant in this Plan on November 30, 2007, (2) is or was a participant in the Noble Energy, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (or its predecessor plan) or the Noble Energy, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, or (3) has his or her pension or pension-related benefits under the Retirement Plan limited by the provisions imposed by the Retirement Plan in order to comply with the maximum compensation limitation requirement of Code section 401(a)(17) or the maximum benefit limitation requirement of Code section 415.
 

 
2

 

(j)           “Payment Date” means (i) with respect to a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service by reason of death, a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the date of such Participant’s death, (ii) with respect to a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service by reason of becoming Disabled, a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the earlier of the date of such Participant’s death or the date such Participant attains the age of sixty-five (65) years, (iii) with respect to a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled and who elected prior to January 1, 2008, to receive his or her benefit under this Plan in the form of a single lump sum payment or in the form of an annuity, a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the earlier of the date of such Participant’s death or the time of payment elected by such Participant in such election, (iv) with respect to a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled and either who became a Participant after December 31, 2007, or whose Separation from Service occurred after attaining the age of sixty-five (65) years, a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the date of such Participant’s Separation from Service for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled, and (v) with respect to a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service prior to attaining the age of sixty-five (65) years for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled and who was a Participant prior to January 1, 2008, but failed to make a time and form of payment election under the Plan prior to January 1, 2008, a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the earlier of the date of such Participant’s death or the date such Participant attains the age of sixty-five (65) years; provided, however, that the foregoing provisions of this paragraph (j) to the contrary notwithstanding, the Payment Date that would otherwise apply with respect to a benefit to be paid or commence being paid under this Plan to a Participant who is a Specified Employee on the date of his or her Separation from Service for a reason other than death shall be postponed to the earlier of (vi) the first day of the seventh month beginning after the date of such Participant’s Separation from Service, or (vii) a date determined by the Committee that is no later than ninety (90) days after the date of such Participant’s death following his or her Separation from Service.
 
(k)           “Plan” means this Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Restoration Plan as in effect from time to time.
 
(l)           “Retirement Plan” means the Noble Energy, Inc. Retirement Plan as in effect from time to time.
 
(m)           “Separation from Service” means, with respect to a Participant, such Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Code section 409A and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder) with the group of employers that includes the Company and each Affiliated Company.  With respect to services as an employee, an employee’s Separation from Service shall be deemed to occur on the date as of which the employee and his or her employer reasonably anticipate that no further services will be performed after such date or that the level of bona fide services the employee will perform after such date (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) will permanently decrease to no more than 20 percent of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period of services to the employer if the employee has been providing services to the employer less than 36 months).
 
(n)           “Specified Employee” means a Participant who is a specified employee within the meaning of Code section 409A(a)(2) and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder. Each Specified Employee will be identified by the Compensation Committee as of each December 31, using such definition of compensation permissible under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-1(i)(2) as the Compensation Committee shall determine in its discretion, and each Specified Employee so identified shall be treated as a Specified Employee for the purposes of this Plan for the entire 12-month period beginning on the April 1 following a December 31 Specified Employee identification date.
 

 
3

 

Section 2.   Nature of Plan .  This Plan is an unfunded plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees and does not qualify under the provisions of Code section 401.
 
Section 3.   Plan Administration .  This Plan shall be administered by the Employee Benefits Committee appointed to administer the Retirement Plan.  The Committee shall have discretionary and final authority to interpret and implement the provisions of this Plan, including without limitation, authority to determine eligibility for benefits under this Plan.  The Committee shall act by a majority of its members at the time in office and such action may be taken either by a vote at a meeting or in writing without a meeting.  The Committee may adopt such rules and procedures for the administration of this Plan as are consistent with the terms hereof and shall keep adequate records of its proceedings and acts.  Every interpretation, choice, determination or other exercise by the Committee of any power or discretion given either expressly or by implication to it shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties having or claiming to have an interest under this Plan or otherwise directly or indirectly affected by such action, without restriction, however, on the right of the Committee to reconsider and redetermine such action.  The members of the Committee shall have no liability for any action taken or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of this Plan.  The Employers shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each member of the Committee and each director, officer and employee of an Employer against any claim, cost, expense (including attorneys’ fees), judgment or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Company) arising out of any act or omission to act as a member of the Committee or any other act or omission to act relating to this Plan, except in the case of such person’s fraud or willful misconduct.
 
Section 4.   Plan Benefit .  A Participant’s benefit under this Plan shall be actuarially equivalent to the excess, if any, of:
 
(a)           the value of the benefit that would have been payable to or with respect to such Participant under the Retirement Plan if (i) the provisions of the Retirement Plan were administered without regard to (1) the maximum amount of compensation limitation imposed under the Retirement Plan in order to comply with Code section 401(a)(17), and (2) the maximum amount of retirement income limitation imposed under the Retirement Plan in order to comply with Code section 415, and (ii) no salary or bonus otherwise payable to such Participant had been deferred by such Participant under the Noble Energy, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (or its predecessor plan), over
 
(b)           the value of the benefit that actually is or was accrued with respect to such Participant under the provisions of the Retirement Plan.
 
For purposes of this Plan, the value of benefits and the amounts payable under alternative forms of benefits shall be determined using the actuarial assumptions being used under the Retirement Plan for such purposes.
 
Section 5. Vesting of Plan Benefit .  A Participant’s benefit under this Plan shall become vested and nonforfeitable upon the first to occur of (i) such Participant’s Initial Vesting Date (as defined in the Retirement Plan), or (ii) such Participant’s Separation from Service by reason of his or her death.  If a Participant’s Separation from Service occurs prior to his or her Initial Vesting Date for a reason other than his or her death, such Participant’s benefit under this Plan shall be forfeited and no benefit shall be payable to or with respect to such Participant pursuant to this Plan.
 
Section 6.   Time and Form of Benefit Payment .  A Participant’s benefit under this Plan that has become vested and nonforfeitable shall become payable to or with respect to such Participant upon the first to occur of such Participant’s Separation from Service (i) by reason of death, (ii) by reason of becoming Disabled, or (iii) for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled, and shall be paid in cash as follows:
 
(a)           for a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service by reason of death, the value of such benefit as of such Participant’s Payment Date shall be paid on such Payment Date to such Participant’s beneficiary or beneficiaries (determined under the provisions of the Plan) in a single lump sum payment.
 

 
4

 

(b)           for a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her   Separation from Service by reason of becoming Disabled, the value of such benefit as of such Participant’s Payment Date shall be paid on such Payment Date to such Participant (or, in the event of such Participant’s death prior to his or her Payment Date, to his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries determined under the provisions of the Plan) in a single lump sum payment.
 
(c)           for a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled and who either (i) elected prior to January 1, 2008, to receive his or her benefit under this Plan in the form of a single lump sum payment, or (ii) became a Participant after December 31, 2007, the value of such benefit as of such Participant’s Payment Date shall be paid on such Payment Date to such Participant (or, in the event of such Participant’s death prior to his or her Payment Date, to his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries determined under the provisions of the Plan) in a single lump sum payment.
 
(d)           for a Participant whose benefit under this Plan becomes payable by reason of his or her Separation from Service for a reason other than death or becoming Disabled and who either (i) elected prior to January 1, 2008, to receive his or her benefit under this Plan in the form of an annuity, or (ii) was a Participant prior to January 1, 2008, but failed to make a time and form of payment election under the Plan prior to January 1, 2008, the value of such benefit as of such Participant’s Payment Date shall commence being paid on such Payment Date to such Participant in the form of such annuity that (i) is available as a form of annuity distribution under the provisions of the Retirement Plan, and (ii) satisfies the requirements to be a “life annuity” within the meaning of Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-2(b)(2)(ii) and other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service.  Such annuity shall be elected by such Participant in accordance with such election procedures as may be established by the Committee from time to time, and shall commence in payment on such Participant’s Payment Date.  If a Participant fails to timely elect his or her form of annuity payment in accordance with the election procedures established by the Committee, the benefit payable to such Participant shall be paid in the form of the following annuity that satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (d) and commences in payment on such Participant’s Payment Date:  (i) for a Participant who is married on his or her Payment Date, in the form of a joint and 50 percent (50%) survivor annuity providing for the payment of a level monthly income to the Participant for life, and in the event the spouse to whom such Participant was married on his or her Payment Date survives such Participant, then upon the death of such Participant a monthly income equal to 50 percent (50%) of the monthly income that was being paid to such Participant during his or her life will be paid to such Participant’s surviving spouse for his or her life, and (ii) for a Participant who is not married on his or her Payment Date, in the form of a single life annuity providing for the payment of a level monthly income to such Participant for life, and in the event such Participant dies before he or she has received payments for a period of ten (10) years, the same monthly benefit that was payable to such Participant shall be paid for the remainder of such ten-year period to such Participant’s beneficiary (or in equal shares to his or her beneficiaries) determined under the provisions of the Plan.  If a Participant to whom this paragraph (d) applies dies after his or her Separation from Service and prior to his or her Payment Date, the value of the benefit that would have been payable to or with respect to such Participant if he or she were living on his or her Payment Date shall be paid on such Payment Date to such Participant’s beneficiary or beneficiaries (determined under the provisions of the Plan) in a single lump sum payment.
 
The amount of the benefit to be paid to or with respect to a Participant pursuant to this Plan Section 6 shall be determined at the time such benefit is to be paid or commence being paid under the provisions of this Plan Section 6.  The payment to a Participant or a beneficiary of a deceased Participant of the amount or amounts payable to such Participant or beneficiary pursuant to this Plan Section 6 shall fully satisfy and discharge all of the obligations and liabilities of the Employers to pay benefits to such Participant or beneficiary pursuant to this Plan.
 
Section 7.   Designation of Beneficiaries .  Any amount payable under this Plan with respect to a Participant who dies prior to his or her Payment Date shall be paid when otherwise due hereunder to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by such Participant.  Such designation of beneficiary or beneficiaries shall be made in writing on a form prescribed by the Committee and, when filed with or as directed by the Committee, shall become effective and remain in effect until changed by such Participant by the filing of a new beneficiary designation form with the Committee.  If a Participant fails to so designate a beneficiary, or in the event all of the designated beneficiaries are individuals who predecease the Participant, any remaining amount payable under this Plan shall be paid when otherwise due hereunder to such Participant’s surviving spouse, if any but if none, then to the Participant’s estate.
 

 
5

 

 
Section 8.   Source of Benefits .  All benefits payable under this Plan to or with respect to a Participant who was an employee of an Employer shall be paid from the general assets of such Employer.  If the benefits payable to or with respect to a Participant under this Plan are attributable to periods of employment with more than one Employer, the amount payable to or with respect to such Participant shall be apportioned among and paid by the Employers who employed such Participant in such proportions as shall be determined by the Committee in its absolute discretion.  No provision of this Plan shall be deemed or construed to create a trust fund of any kind or to grant to any Participant or beneficiary of a Participant any property right or beneficial ownership interest of any kind in the assets of an Employer.  To the extent that any Participant or beneficiary of a Participant acquires a right to receive payments from an Employer pursuant to this Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of such Employer.
 
Section 9.   Amendment and Termination .  The Board of Directors of the Company shall have the right and power at any time and from time to time to amend this Plan, in whole or in part, on behalf of all Employers, and at any time to terminate this Plan or any Employer’s participation hereunder; provided, however, that (i) no such amendment or termination shall, without the written consent of the affected Participant or beneficiary of a deceased Participant, (1) reduce an Employer’s obligation for the payment of the benefits accrued under this Plan with respect to such Participant as of the date of such amendment or termination (such benefits to be determined as if the Retirement Plan had terminated on such date), or further defer the dates for the payment of such benefits, or (2) accelerate the time for the payment of the benefits accrued under this Plan with respect to such Participant in a manner that subjects such benefits to the tax imposed under Code section 409A, and (ii) for a period of two (2) years following a Change in Control, no amendment or termination of this Plan shall become effective with respect to a Participant or beneficiary of a deceased Participant without the prior written consent of such Participant or beneficiary.  Any amendment to or termination of this Plan shall be made by or pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, and shall be evidenced by such resolution or by a written instrument executed by such person as the Board of Directors of the Company shall authorize for such purpose.
 
Section 10.   Spendthrift Provision .  No right or interest under this Plan of a Participant or beneficiary of a Participant may be assigned, transferred or alienated, in whole or in part, either directly or by operation of law (except pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order within the meaning of Code section 414(p)), and no such right or interest shall be liable for or subject to any debt, obligation or liability of such Participant or beneficiary.
 
Section 11.   Employment Noncontractual .  The establishment of this Plan shall not enlarge or otherwise affect the terms of any Participant’s employment with an Employer, and such Employer may terminate the employment of such Participant as freely and with the same effect as if this Plan had not been established.
 
Section 12.   Adoption by Other Employers .  This Plan may be adopted by any Employer participating in the Retirement Plan, such adoption to be effective as of the date specified by such Employer at the time of adoption.
 
Section 13.   Forfeiture for Dishonesty .  If a Participant’s employment with an Employer is terminated because of dishonest conduct injurious to such Employer, or if dishonest conduct injurious to an Employer is committed by a Participant employed by an Employer and such conduct is discovered by such Employer during the lifetime of such Participant and within one (1) year after his or her employment with such Employer terminated or within one (1) year after his or her election to receive or commence receiving benefits under the Retirement Plan, (i) no benefit shall be payable under this Plan to or with respect to such Participant, and (ii) such Participant shall repay to each Employer the amount of any benefit paid by such Employer to such Participant pursuant to this Plan, with interest at such reasonable rate as shall be specified by the Committee.  A determination by the Committee that a Participant has engaged in dishonest conduct injurious to an Employer shall be made by the Committee only after a full investigation of such alleged dishonest conduct and an opportunity has been given to such Participant to appear before the Committee to present his or her case.  A determination made by the Committee that a Participant has engaged in dishonest conduct injurious to an Employer shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties having or claiming to have an interest under this Plan or otherwise directly or indirectly affected by such determination.
 

 
6

 

Section 14.   Claims Procedure .  If any person (hereinafter called the “Claimant”) feels that he or she is being denied a benefit to which he or she is entitled under this Plan, such Claimant may file a written claim for said benefit with the Committee.  Within sixty (60) days following the receipt of such claim the Committee shall determine and notify the Claimant as to whether he or she is entitled to such benefit.  Such notification shall be in writing and, if denying the claim for benefit, shall set forth the specific reason or reasons for the denial, make specific reference to the pertinent provisions of this Plan, and advise the Claimant that he or she may, within sixty (60) days following the receipt of such notice, in writing request to appear before the Committee or its designated representative for a hearing to review such denial.  Any such hearing shall be scheduled at the mutual convenience of the Committee or its designated representative and the Claimant, and at any such hearing the Claimant and/or his or her duly authorized representative may examine any relevant documents and present evidence and arguments to support the granting of the benefit being claimed.  The final decision of the Committee with respect to the claim being reviewed shall be made within sixty days following the hearing thereon, and the Committee shall in writing notify the Claimant of said final decision, again specifying the reasons therefor and the pertinent provisions of this Plan upon which said final decision is based.  The final decision of the Committee shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties having or claiming to have an interest in the matter being reviewed.
 
Section 15.   Tax Withholding .  An Employer making a payment to or with respect to a Participant pursuant to this Plan shall withhold from any such payment, and shall remit to the appropriate governmental authority, any income, employment or other tax such Employer is required by applicable law to so withhold from and remit on behalf of the payee.
 
Section 16.   Special Distributions .  Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the Committee in its absolute discretion may direct an Employer to accelerate the time for the making of a payment under this Plan to or with respect to a Participant to the extent that such acceleration is a permitted exception under Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-3(j)(4) (or other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service) that does not subject such accelerated payment to the tax imposed by Code section 409A.
 
Section 17.   409A Transition Period Election .  Subject to such conditions, limitations and procedures as the Committee may prescribe, on or before December 31, 2007, a Participant may make a time and form of payment election for the payment of the benefit, if any, that may become payable to such Participant under the Plan, provided that such election complies with the transition relief requirements for the making of such an election as promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service in Notice 2007-86 and any other applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service).
 
Section 18.   Compliance with Code Section 409A .  The compensation payable by an Employer to a Participant or beneficiary of a deceased Participant pursuant to this Plan is intended to be compensation that is not subject to the tax imposed by Code section 409A, and this Plan shall be administered and construed to the fullest extent possible to reflect and implement such intent.
 
Section 19.   November 30, 2007, Benefit Payments .  Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the benefits being paid on November 30, 2007, to or with respect to a Participant under the provisions of this Plan as in effect on November 30, 2007, shall continue to be paid to or with respect to such Participant in accordance with the provisions of this Plan as in effect on November 30, 2007.  The benefits payable to or with respect to any other Participant shall be paid to or with respect to such Participant in accordance with the provisions of this Plan as in effect on or after December 1, 2007.
 
Section 20.   Applicable Law .  This Plan shall be governed and construed in accordance with the internal laws (and not the principles relating to conflicts of laws) of the State of Texas, except where superseded by federal law.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Plan has been executed by the Company on behalf of all Employers on this 6th day of December, 2007, to be effective as of December 1, 2007.
 
  NOBLE ENERGY, INC.  
       
 
By:
/s/ Charles D. Davidson  
    Name: Charles D. Davidson  
    Title:   President  
       
 
 
7

 

EXHIBIT 21

NOBLE ENERGY, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES


NAME
 
STATE OF JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
 
REF
         
Noble Energy Marketing, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Noble Gas Pipeline, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(2)
Samedan of North Africa, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
EDC Ireland
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy International Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy EG Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(4)
Noble Energy JDZ Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(4)
Alba Associates LLC
 
Cayman Islands
 
(9)
Alba Plant LLC
 
Cayman Islands
 
(10)
MachalaPower Cia. Ltda.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(4)
Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(4)
Yam Tethys Ltd.
 
Israel
 
(13)
Noble Energy Suriname Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(4)
AMPCO Marketing, L.L.C.
 
Michigan
 
(5)
AMPCO Services, L.L.C.
 
Michigan
 
(5)
Atlantic Methanol Capital Company
 
Cayman Islands
 
(5)
Samedan Methanol
 
Cayman Islands
 
(6)
Atlantic Methanol Associates LLC
 
Cayman Islands
 
(7)
Atlantic Methanol Production Company LLC
 
Cayman Islands
 
(8)
Samedan Oil of Indonesia, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Samedan Pipe Line Corporation
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Samedan Royalty Corporation
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Noble Energy Australia, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
EDC Ecuador Ltd.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Noble Energy Ecuador Ltd.
 
Cayman Islands
 
(12)
Energy Development Corporation (Argentina), Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Energy Development Corporation (China), Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Energy Development Corporation (HIPS), Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Gasdel Pipeline System Incorporated
 
New Jersey
 
(1)
HGC, Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Producers Service, Inc.
 
New Jersey
 
(1)
EDC (Denmark) Inc.
 
Delaware
 
(3)
Noble Energy (Europe) Limited
 
United Kingdom
 
(3)
Noble Energy (ISE) Limited
 
United Kingdom
 
(11)
Noble Energy (Oilex) Limited
 
United Kingdom
 
(11)
Brabant Oil Limited
 
United Kingdom
 
(11)
Noble Energy Aviation, LLC
 
Delaware
 
(1)
Noble Energy Cameroon Limited
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy Adriana Limited
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy Belinda Limited
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy Benita Limited
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)
Noble Energy Caribbean LLC
 
Cayman Islands
 
(14)
Noble Energy Norge AS
 
Norway
 
(3)
Noble Energy YOYO-1 Limited
 
Cayman Islands
 
(3)


1



 
   
     
(1)
 
100% directly owned by Noble Energy, Inc. (Registrant)
(2)
 
100% directly owned by Noble Energy Marketing, Inc.
(3)
 
100% directly owned by  Samedan of North Africa, Inc.
(4)
 
100% directly owned by Noble Energy International Ltd.
(5)
 
50% directly owned by Samedan of North Africa, Inc.
(6)
 
100% directly owned by Atlantic Methanol Capital Company
(7)
 
50% directly owned by Samedan Methanol
(8)
 
90% directly owned by Atlantic Methanol Associates LLC
(9)
 
35% directly owned by Noble Energy International Ltd.
(10)
 
80% directly owned by Alba Associates LLC
(11)
 
100% directly owned by Noble Energy (Europe) Limited
(12)
 
100% directly owned by EDC Ecuador Ltd.
(13)
 
47.059% directly owned by Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd.
(14)
 
100% directly owned by Noble Energy Suriname Ltd.


 
 
2

 
 
 
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors
Noble Energy, Inc.:
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-18929 and 333-82953) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-108162, 333-118976, 333-118977, 333-124964, 333-143203 and 333-143204) on Form S-8  of Noble Energy, Inc. of our reports dated February 25, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Noble Energy, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Energy, Inc. Our report refers to changes in the methods of accounting for stock-based compensation and defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans.

 
KPMG LLP
 
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2008
 

1

 

EXHIBIT 23.2
 
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 333-18929 and 333-82953 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-108162, 333-118976, 333-118977,  333-124964, 333-143203 and 333-143204 of Noble Energy, Inc. of our report   dated February 15, 2008, relating to the financial statements of Alba Plant LLC, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 


Houston, TX
February 22, 2008

1

 

EXHIBIT 23.3



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-18929 and 333-82953), and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-108162, 333-118976, 333-118977, 333-124964, 333-143203 and 333-143204) of Noble Energy, Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 

 
/s/ UHY LLP
 
Houston, Texas
February 22, 2008

1

 

EXHIBIT 23.4


Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.


 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-108162, No. 333-118976, No. 333-118977, No. 333-124964, 333-143203 and 333-143204) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-18929 and No. 333-82953) on Form S-3 of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) of the reference to Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and the inclusion of our report dated February 21, 2008, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, of the Company and its subsidiaries, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
         
 
NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
 
 
 
By:  
/s/ Danny D. Simmons
 
   
Danny D. Simmons
 
   
Executive Vice President
 
 

Houston, Texas
February 26, 2008


 
1

 
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 7241)

I, Charles D. Davidson, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Energy, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 
 
/s/ CHARLES D. DAVIDSON
 
CHARLES D. DAVIDSON
Chief Executive Officer

1

 
 
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 7241)

I, Chris Tong, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Energy, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 
 
/s/ CHRIS TONG
 
CHRIS TONG
Chief Financial Officer


 
1

 
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Charles D. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
February 27, 2008
 
/s/ CHARLES D. DAVIDSON
 
 
 
CHARLES D. DAVIDSON
 
 
Chief Executive Officer


1

 
 
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Chris Tong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
February 27, 2008
 
/s/ CHRIS TONG
 
 
 
CHRIS TONG
 
 
Chief Financial Officer



1

 
EXHIBIT 99.1



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Stockholders of
Alba Plant LLC


In our opinion, the balance sheets and the related statements of operations, statements of stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Alba Plant LLC (the “Company”) at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Houston, TX
February 15, 2008


 
1

 
EXHIBIT 99.2



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Members of
Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC
Houston, Texas

We have audited the accompanying statements of income, members’ equity and cash flows of Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Atlantic Methanol Production Company, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/S/ UHY LLP



Houston, Texas
February 22, 2008

1

 
EXHIBIT 99.3
 
NSA LOGO  
WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
ENGINEERING • GEOLOGY • GEOPHYSICS • PETROPHYSICS
CHAIRMAN & CEO
C.S. (SCOTT) REES III
PRESIDENT & COO
DANNY D. SIMMONS
EXECUTIVE VP
G. LANCE BINDER
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
P. SCOTT FROST • DALLAS
J. CARTER HENSON, JR. • HOUSTON
DAN PAUL SMITH • DALLAS
JOSEPH J. SPELLMAN • DALLAS
THOMAS J. TELLA II • DALLAS



February 21, 2008


Mr. William T. Van Kleef
Chairman
Noble Energy, Inc. Audit Committee
Suite 100
100 Glenborough Drive
Houston, Texas 77067

Dear Mr. Van Kleef:

In accordance with your request, we have audited the estimates prepared by Noble Energy, Inc. (Noble), as of December 31, 2007, of the proved reserves to the Noble  interest in certain oil and gas properties located in the United States and throughout the world.  These estimates are based on constant prices and costs, as discussed in subsequent paragraphs of this letter.  We have examined the estimates with respect to reserves quantities, reserves categorization, and future producing rates, using the definitions set forth in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) and subsequent staff interpretations and guidance.  The estimates of reserves have been prepared in accordance with the definitions and guidelines of the SEC.

The following table sets forth Noble's estimates of the net reserves as of December 31, 2007, for the audited properties:

   
Net Reserves
Category
 
Oil
(Barrels)
 
Gas
(MCF)
Proved Developed
       
Producing
 
202,852,591
 
2,331,506,062
Non-Producing
 
26,187,838
 
224,549,875
Proved Undeveloped
 
99,989,511
 
751,411,215
Total Proved
 
329,029,940
 
3,307,467,152

The oil reserves shown include crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids (NGL).  Oil volumes are expressed in barrels that are equivalent to 42 United States gallons.  Gas volumes are expressed in thousands of cubic feet (MCF) at standard temperature and pressure bases.

When compared on a field-by-field basis, some of the estimates of Noble are greater and some are less than the estimates of Netherland, Sewell & Associates. Inc.  However, in our opinion the estimates of Noble's proved reserves shown herein are, in the aggregate, reasonable and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles.  These principles are set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.  We are satisfied with the methods and procedures used by Noble in preparing the December 31, 2007, estimates of reserves, and we saw nothing of an unusual nature that would cause us to take exception with the estimates, in the aggregate, as prepared by Noble.
 
 
 
 
 
 

4500 Thanksgiving Tower •1601 Elm Street • Dallas, Texas 75201-4754 • Ph: 214-969-5401 • Fax: 214-969-5411
nsai@nsai-petro.com
1221 Lamar Street, Suite 1200 •Houston, Texas 77010-3072 • Ph: 713-654-4950 • Fax: 713-654-4951
netherlandsewell.com
 

 

1

 

NSA LOGO  

 

The estimates shown herein are for proved developed producing, proved developed non-producing, and proved undeveloped reserves.  Noble's estimates do not include probable or possible reserves that may exist for these properties, nor do they include any consideration of undeveloped acreage beyond those tracts for which undeveloped reserves have been estimated.  Reserves categorization conveys the relative degree of certainty; reserves subcategorization is based on development and production status.  The estimates of reserves and future revenue included herein have not been adjusted for risk.

Oil, NGL, and gas prices were used only to determine economic limits for the properties and economic viability of future projects.  Oil and NGL prices used by Noble are based on the December 31. 2007, Energy Intelligence Group, Inc.'s West Texas Intermediate (Cushing) price of $95.92 per barrel and are adjusted by lease for quality, transportation fees, and regional price differentials.  Gas prices used by Noble are based on the December 31, 2007, Platts Henry Hub spot market price of $6.795 per MMBTU and are adjusted by lease for energy content, transportation fees, and regional price differentials.  All prices are held constant throughout the lives of the properties.

Operating costs and capital costs were used only to determine economic limits for the properties and economic viability of future projects.  Lease and well operating costs used by Noble are based on historical operating expense records.  These costs include the per-well overhead expenses allowed under joint operating agreements along with estimates of costs to be incurred at and below the district and field levels.  Headquarters general and administrative overhead expenses of Noble are included only to the extent that they are covered under joint operating agreements for the operated properties.  Lease and well operating costs are held constant throughout the lives of the properties.  Noble's estimates of capital costs are included as required for workovers, new development wells, and production equipment.  The future capital costs are held constant to the date of expenditure.

It should be understood that our audit does not constitute a complete reserves study of the oil and gas properties of Noble.  Our audit consisted primarily of substantive testing, wherein we conducted a detailed review of major properties making up approximately 81 percent of the company's total proved reserves.  In the conduct of our audit, we have not independently verified the accuracy and completeness of information and data furnished by Noble with respect to ownership interests, oil and gas production, well test data, historical costs of operation and development, product prices, or any agreements relating to current and future operations of the properties and sales of production.  However, if in the course of our examination something came to our attention that brought into question the validity or sufficiency of any such information or data, we did not rely on such information or data until we had satisfactorily resolved our questions relating thereto or had independently verified such information or data.  Our audit did not include a review of Noble's overall reserves management processes and practices.

In evaluating the information at our disposal concerning this audit, we have excluded from our consideration all matters as to which the controlling interpretation may be legal or accounting, rather than engineering and geologic.  As in all aspects of oil and gas evaluation, there are uncertainties inherent in the interpretation of engineering and geologic data; therefore, our conclusions necessarily represent only informed professional judgment.


2

 

NSA LOGO  


Supporting data documenting this audit, along with data provided by Noble, are on file in our office.  We are independent petroleum engineers, geologists, geophysicists, and petrophysicists with respect to Noble Energy, Inc. as provided in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.  We do not own an interest in these properties and are not employed on a contingent basis.

 
Sincerely,
   
 
NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
   
 
By: /s/ C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.  
 
C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   
By: /s/ Danny D. Simmons. P.E.
By: /s/ David E. Nice, P.G.
Danny D. Simmons, P.E.
David E. Nice, P.G.
President and Chief Operating Officer
Vice President
   
Date Signed:    February 21, 2008
Date Signed:    February 21, 2008


RBT:PSF
 
cc:  Mr. John Lewis, Noble Energy, Inc.

Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients.  The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI.  The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document.  In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document.



 
3