____________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Commission
|
Registrant; State of Incorporation;
|
I.R.S. Employer
|
|
|
|
1-5324 |
NORTHEAST UTILITIES
|
04-2147929 |
|
|
|
0-00404 |
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
|
06-0303850 |
|
|
|
1-6392 |
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
|
02-0181050 |
|
|
|
0-7624 |
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
04-1961130 |
____________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
|
Ö |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
|
Large
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Non-accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast Utilities |
Ö |
|
|
|
|
The Connecticut Light and Power Company |
|
|
|
|
Ö |
Public Service Company of New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|
Ö |
Western Massachusetts Electric Company |
|
|
|
|
Ö |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
Northeast Utilities |
|
Ö |
The Connecticut Light and Power Company |
|
Ö |
Public Service Company of New Hampshire |
|
Ö |
Western Massachusetts Electric Company |
|
Ö |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers' classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Northeast Utilities holds all of the 6,035,205 shares, 301 shares, and 434,653 shares of the outstanding common stock of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company, respectively.
Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Western Massachusetts Electric Company each meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
|
The following is a glossary of frequently used abbreviations or acronyms that are found in this report. |
|
|
|
CURRENT OR FORMER NU COMPANIES, SEGMENTS OR INVESTMENTS: |
|
|
|
Boulos |
E.S. Boulos Company |
CL&P |
The Connecticut Light and Power Company |
CRC |
CL&P Receivables Corporation |
HWP |
Holyoke Water Power Company |
Mt. Tom |
Mt. Tom generating plant |
NGC |
Northeast Generation Company |
NGS |
Northeast Generation Services Company and subsidiaries |
NU or the company |
Northeast Utilities |
NU Enterprises |
At September 30, 2008, NU Enterprises, Inc. is the parent company of Select Energy, NGS, SECI and Boulos. For further information, see Note 9, "Segment Information," to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
NU parent and other companies |
NU parent and other companies is comprised of NU parent, Northeast Utilities Service Company, HWP (since January 1, 2007) and other subsidiaries, including The Rocky River Realty Company and The Quinnehtuk Company (both real estate subsidiaries), Mode 1 Communications, Inc. (telecommunications) and the nonenergy-related subsidiaries of Yankee (Yankee Energy Services Company, Yankee Energy Financial Services Company, and NorConn Properties, Inc.) |
PSNH |
Public Service Company of New Hampshire |
Regulated companies |
NU's regulated companies, comprised of the electric distribution and transmission segments of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO, the generation segment of PSNH and Yankee Gas, a natural gas local distribution company. For further information, see Note 9, "Segment Information," to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
SECI |
Select Energy Contracting, Inc. |
Select Energy |
Select Energy, Inc. |
SESI |
Select Energy Services, Inc. |
WMECO |
Western Massachusetts Electric Company |
Yankee |
Yankee Energy System, Inc. |
Yankee Gas |
Yankee Gas Services Company |
|
|
REGULATORS: |
|
|
|
DPU |
Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (formerly the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy (DTE)) |
DPUC |
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control |
FERC |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
NHPUC |
New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission |
SEC |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
i
OTHER: |
|
|
|
AFUDC |
Allowance For Funds Used During Construction |
CfD |
Contract for Differences |
Con Edison |
Consolidated Edison, Inc. |
CTA |
Competitive Transition Assessment |
EPS |
Earnings Per Share |
ES |
Default Energy Service |
FASB |
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FMCC |
Federally Mandated Congestion Charges |
GSC |
Generation Service Charge |
ISO-NE |
New England Independent System Operator or ISO New England, Inc. |
KWH |
Kilowatt-Hour |
KV |
Kilovolt |
LOC |
Letter of Credit |
MW |
Megawatts |
NU 2007 Form 10-K |
The Northeast Utilities and Subsidiaries combined 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC |
NYMPA |
New York Municipal Power Agency |
PBOP |
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions |
Regulatory ROE |
The average cost of capital method for calculating the return on equity related to the distribution and generation business segments excluding the wholesale transmission segment. |
RMR |
Reliability Must Run |
ROE |
Return on Equity |
SBC |
System Benefits Charge |
SCRC |
Stranded Cost Recovery Charge |
SFAS |
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
TCAM |
Transmission Cost Adjustment Mechanism |
TSO |
Transitional Standard Offer |
UI |
The United Illuminating Company |
VAR |
Voltage Ampere Reactive |
ii
NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARIES
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
|
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
ITEM 1 - Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the Following Companies: |
|
|
|
Northeast Utilities and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited - all companies) |
6 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
The Connecticut Light and Power Company and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - Septe mber 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
34 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
40 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
Western Massachusetts Electric Company and Subsidiary |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
46 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
iii
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the following companies: |
|
|
|
||
50 |
||
|
||
79 |
||
|
||
83 |
||
|
||
87 |
||
|
||
ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
90 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
||
|
||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
||
|
||
92 |
||
|
||
92 |
||
|
||
ITEM 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
92 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
||
|
||
95 |
||
|
iv
NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
1
2
3
4
5
NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARIES
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (All Companies)
A.
Presentation
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the entirety of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the first and second quarter 2008 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the Annual Reports of Northeast Utilities (NU or the company), The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P), Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH), and Western Massachusetts Electric Company (WMECO), which were filed with the SEC as part of the Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries combined 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K (NU 2007 Form 10-K). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly NU's and the above companies' financial position at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. The results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements of NU and its subsidiaries, as applicable, include the accounts of all their respective subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain reclassifications of prior period data included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been made to conform with the current period's presentation.
NU's condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 classify activity related to the following subsidiaries as discontinued operations:
·
Northeast Generation Company (NGC),
·
The Mt. Tom generating plant (Mt. Tom) previously owned by Holyoke Water Power Company (HWP), and
·
Select Energy Contracting, Inc. (including Reeds Ferry Supply Co., Inc.) (SECI).
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the remaining portions of SECI that were included in continuing operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income as a result of winding down SECI operations in 2007. The amounts of these reclassifications are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
Operating expenses |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(1.0) |
Other interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.3 |
Income tax expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.3) |
Net (loss)/income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
6
For further information regarding discontinued operations, see Note 7, "Discontinued Operations," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
B.
Regulatory Accounting
The accounting policies of the regulated companies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to rate-regulated enterprises and historically reflect the effects of the rate-making process in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation."
The transmission and distribution segments of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO, along with PSNH's generation segment and Yankee Gas Service Company's (Yankee Gas) distribution segment, continue to be cost-of-service, rate regulated. Management believes that the application of SFAS No. 71 to those segments continues to be appropriate. Management also believes it is probable that NU's regulated companies will recover their investments in long-lived assets, including regulatory assets. All material net regulatory assets are earning an equity return, except for securitized regulatory assets and the majority of deferred benefit costs, which are not supported by equity. Amortization and deferrals of regulatory assets/(liabilities) are included on a net basis in amortization expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
Regulatory Assets: The components of regulatory assets are as follows:
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
NU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yankee Gas
|
|||||
Securitized assets |
|
$ |
733.9 |
|
$ |
419.4 |
|
$ |
239.1 |
|
$ |
75.4 |
|
$ |
- |
Income taxes, net |
|
|
352.3 |
|
|
304.7 |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
9.8 |
Deferred benefit costs |
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
56.4 |
Unrecovered contractual obligations |
|
|
173.6 |
|
|
136.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
- |
Regulatory assets offsetting regulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL&P SBC undercollections |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
230.1 |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
51.7 |
Totals |
|
$ |
2,372.2 |
|
$ |
1,684.4 |
|
$ |
407.3 |
|
$ |
162.2 |
|
$ |
118.3 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
NU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yankee Gas
|
|||||
Securitized assets |
|
$ |
907.0 |
|
$ |
548.2 |
|
$ |
273.2 |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
$ |
- |
Income taxes, net |
|
|
335.5 |
|
|
279.4 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
7.6 |
Deferred benefit costs |
|
|
201.4 |
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
70.6 |
Unrecovered contractual obligations |
|
|
189.9 |
|
|
148.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
(0.1) |
Regulatory assets offsetting regulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL&P CTA and SBC undercollections |
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
53.7 |
Totals |
|
$ |
2,057.1 |
|
$ |
1,330.0 |
|
$ |
401.4 |
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
$ |
131.8 |
At December 31, 2007, CL&P's Competitive Transition Assessment (CTA) was recorded as a $54 million regulatory asset as CTA unrecovered costs were in excess of CTA collections. At September 30, 2008, CTA collections were in excess of CTA costs and a $26.7 million regulatory liability was recorded.
Included in regulatory assets offsetting regulated company derivative liabilities are $577.2 million and $86.7 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, of derivative liabilities relating to CL&Ps capacity contracts, referred to as contracts for differences (CfDs). For further information, see Note 2, "Derivative Instruments," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Included in NU's other regulatory assets are the regulatory assets associated with the implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143," totaling $44.3 million at September 30, 2008 and $40.6 million at December 31, 2007. Management believes that recovery of these regulatory assets is probable.
Additionally, the regulated companies had $4.2 million and $11.9 million of regulatory costs at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, that were included in deferred debits and other assets - other on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
7
sheets. These amounts represent regulatory costs that have not yet been approved for recovery by the applicable regulatory agency. Management believes these costs are recoverable in future cost-of-service regulated rates.
Regulatory Liabilities: The components of regulatory liabilities are as follows:
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
NU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of removal |
|
$ |
231.7 |
|
$ |
94.1 |
|
$ |
66.3 |
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
$ |
50.9 |
Regulatory liabilities offsetting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL&P CTA, GSC and FMCC
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL&P AFUDC transmission incentive |
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Other regulatory liabilities |
|
|
94.5 |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
23.6 |
Totals |
|
$ |
645.2 |
|
$ |
440.9 |
|
$ |
95.6 |
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
$ |
75.2 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
NU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of removal |
|
$ |
262.6 |
|
$ |
116.6 |
|
$ |
72.8 |
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
$ |
51.7 |
Regulatory liabilities offsetting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL&P GSC and FMCC overcollections |
|
|
119.2 |
|
|
119.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
CL&P AFUDC transmission incentive |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Other regulatory liabilities |
|
|
118.2 |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
31.4 |
Totals |
|
$ |
851.8 |
|
$ |
601.5 |
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
$ |
39.4 |
|
$ |
83.3 |
Included in regulatory liabilities offsetting regulated company derivative assets are $0.4 million at December 31, 2007 of derivative assets relating to CL&Ps CfDs. For further information, see Note 2, "Derivative Instruments," to the condensed consolidated financial statements. For information regarding CL&P allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) transmission incentive, see Note 1D, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Allowance for Funds Used During Construction," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
C.
Fair Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, the company adopted SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," which establishes a framework for defining and measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157:
·
Defines fair value as the price that would be received for the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).
·
Establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs to the valuations of assets and liabilities.
·
Requires consideration of the company's own creditworthiness and risk of nonperformance when valuing its liabilities.
·
Requires prospective implementation with adjustments to fair value reflected in earnings, similar to a change in estimate, with exceptions including recognition of previously deferred initial gains or losses described below.
·
Requires recognition in retained earnings of previously deferred initial gains or losses on derivative contracts whose estimated fair values are based on significant unobservable inputs. Recognition of the initial gains or losses was previously prohibited under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3, " Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities." CL&Ps initial gains and losses on its CfDs that would have been recorded in retained earnings upon adoption were recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities because their costs or benefits are expected to be fully recovered from or refunded to customers.
The company applied SFAS No. 157 to the regulated and unregulated companies' derivative contracts that are recorded at fair value and to the marketable securities held in NU's Rabbi Trust and WMECO's prior spent nuclear fuel trust. SFAS No. 157 also applies to investment valuations for NUs pension and other postretirement benefit plans beginning as of December 31, 2008, and beginning in 2009, to nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities such as goodwill and asset retirement obligations.
8
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 157, the company recorded a pre-tax charge to earnings of $6.1 million as of January 1, 2008 related to derivative liabilities for its remaining unregulated wholesale marketing contracts. In the first nine months of 2008, the company recorded a $1.5 million pre-tax benefit to partially reverse the exit price impact recorded under SFAS No. 157 as the company served out rather than exited the contracts.
The company also recorded changes in fair value of certain derivative contracts of CL&P. Because CL&P is a cost-of-service, rate regulated entity, the cost or benefit of the contracts is expected to be fully recovered from or refunded to CL&P's customers and an offsetting regulatory asset or liability was recorded to reflect these changes. As of January 1, 2008, implementing SFAS No. 157 resulted in a total increase to CL&P's derivative liabilities, with an offset to regulatory assets, of approximately $590 million, and a total decrease to derivative assets, with an offset to regulatory liabilities, of approximately $30 million.
Fair Value Hierarchy: As required by SFAS No. 157, in measuring fair value the company uses observable market data when available and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs are needed to value certain derivative contracts due to complexities in contractual terms and the long duration of a contract. SFAS No. 157 requires inputs used in fair value measurements to be categorized into three fair value hierarchy levels for disclosure purposes. The entire fair value measurement is categorized based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 - Inputs are quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable.
Level 3 - Quoted market prices are not available. Fair value is derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or assumptions are unobservable. Where possible, valuation techniques incorporate observable market inputs that can be validated to external sources such as industry exchanges, including prices of energy and energy-related products. Significant unobservable inputs are used in the valuations, including items such as energy and energy-related product prices in future years for which observable prices are not yet available, future contract quantities under full-requirements or supplemental sales contracts, and market volatilities. Items valued using these valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level for which there is at least one input that is significant to the valuation. Therefore, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.
Determination of Fair Value: The following is a description of the valuation techniques utilized in our fair value measurements:
Derivative contracts: Many of the company's derivative positions that are recorded at fair value are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy and are valued using models that incorporate both observable and unobservable inputs. Fair value is modeled using techniques such as discounted cash flow approaches adjusted for assumptions relating to exit price and the Black-Scholes option pricing model, incorporating the terms of the contracts. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the valuations include energy and energy-related product prices for future years for long-dated derivative contracts, future contract quantities under full requirements and supplemental sales contracts, and market volatilities. Discounted cash flow valuations incorporate estimates of premiums or discounts that would be required by a market participant to arrive at an exit price, using available historical market transaction information. Valuations of derivative contracts also reflect nonperformance risk, including credit. The derivative contracts classified as Level 3 include NU Enterprises, Inc.'s (NU Enterprises) remaining wholesale marketing contract and its related supply contracts, CL&P's CfDs, CL&P's contracts with certain independent power producers (IPPs) and regulated company options and financial transmission rights (FTRs).
Other derivative contracts recorded at fair value are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. An active market for the same or similar contracts exists for these contracts, which include regulated company forward contracts to purchase energy and interest rate swap agreements for the regulated companies and NU parent. For these contracts, valuations are based on quoted prices in the market and include some modeling using market-based assumptions.
For further information on derivative contracts, see Note 2, "Derivative Instruments," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Marketable securities: The company holds in trust marketable securities, which include equity securities, mutual funds and cash equivalents, and fixed maturity securities.
9
Equity securities, mutual funds and cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. These investments are traded in active markets and quoted prices are available for identical investments.
Fixed maturity securities classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy include U.S. Treasury securities, corporate bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations, U.S. pass-through bonds, asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and commercial paper. The fair value of these instruments is estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. The pricing models utilize observable inputs such as recent trades for the same or similar instruments, yield curves, discount margins and bond structures.
For further information see Note 3, "Fair Value Measurements," to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
D.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC is included in the cost of the regulated companies' utility plant and represents the cost of borrowed and equity funds used to finance construction. The portion of AFUDC attributable to borrowed funds is recorded as a reduction of other interest expense, and the AFUDC related to equity funds is recorded as other income on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income:
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars, except percentages) |
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Borrowed funds |
$ |
4.3 |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
$ |
12.9 |
Equity funds |
|
8.5 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
11.1 |
Totals |
$ |
12.8 |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
$ |
24.0 |
Average AFUDC rates |
|
8.4% |
|
|
7.6% |
|
|
8.3% |
|
|
7.3% |
The regulated companies' average AFUDC rate is based on a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) prescribed formula that produces an average rate using the cost of a company's short-term financings as well as a company's capitalization (preferred stock, long-term debt and common equity). The average rate is applied to average eligible construction work in progress (CWIP) amounts to calculate AFUDC. Although AFUDC is recorded on 100 percent of CL&P's CWIP for its major transmission projects in southwest Connecticut, 50 percent of this AFUDC is being reserved as a regulatory liability to reflect current rate base recovery for 50 percent of the CWIP as a result of FERC approved transmission incentives.
E.
Sale of Customer Receivables
Prior to June 30, 2008, under the Receivables Purchase and Sale Agreement, CL&P Receivables Corporation (CRC), a consolidated, wholly-owned subsidiary of CL&P, purchased an undivided interest in CL&P's accounts receivable and unbilled revenues and could sell up to $100 million thereof to a financial institution. At December 31, 2007, there were $20 million in such sales. On June 30, 2008, CL&P chose to terminate the Receivables Purchase and Sale Agreement and there are no receivables sold under that facility.
At December 31, 2007, amounts totaling $308.2 million sold to CRC by CL&P but not sold to the financial institution were included in investments in securitizable assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. These amounts would have been excluded from CL&P's assets in the event of bankruptcy by CL&P. Since CL&P chose to terminate the Receivables Purchase and Sale Agreement on June 30, 2008, all such amounts are now included in accounts receivables and unbilled revenues on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008.
10
F.
Other Income, Net
The pre-tax components of other income/(loss) items are as follows:
NU |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
$ |
18.6 |
2008 federal tax settlement - interest |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
- |
AFUDC - equity funds |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
11.1 |
Energy Independence Act incentives |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
5.0 |
Conservation and load management incentives |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
1.8 |
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.8 |
Total Other Income |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
37.3 |
Other Loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment loss |
|
|
(4.0) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7.8) |
|
|
- |
Investment write-down |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.5) |
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
(0.1) |
Total Other Loss |
|
|
(4.0) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(8.0) |
|
|
(0.6) |
Total Other Income, Net |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
$ |
36.7 |
CL&P |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
$ |
4.3 |
2008 federal tax settlement - interest |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
- |
AFUDC - equity funds |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
9.0 |
Energy Independence Act incentives |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
5.0 |
Conservation and load management incentives |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
1.4 |
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.6 |
Total Other Income |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
20.3 |
Investment loss |
|
|
(2.7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5.3) |
|
|
- |
Total Other Income, Net |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
$ |
20.3 |
PSNH |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
2008 federal tax settlement - interest |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
- |
AFUDC - equity funds |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
0.9 |
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Total Other Income |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
1.6 |
Investment loss |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.3) |
|
|
- |
Total Other Income, Net |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
WMECO |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
2008 federal tax settlement - interest |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
- |
AFUDC - equity funds |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
- |
Conservation and load management incentives |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.4 |
Total Other Income |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
Investment loss |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
|
- |
Total Other Income, Net |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
Investment income for NU includes equity in earnings of regional nuclear generating and transmission companies of $0.4 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and $1.4 million and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Equity in earnings relates to the company's investment in Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPC), Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Yankee Atomic Electric Company and two regional transmission companies.
11
For further information regarding interest from the 2008 federal tax settlement, see Note 1G, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Income Taxes," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
G.
Income Taxes
Tax Positions: In September 2008, NU and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reached a settlement agreement related to the timing for deducting certain costs. This agreement will close the federal tax years 2002 through 2004. The issues regarding the timing for deducting these costs are also subject to review during the 2005 through 2007 IRS federal audit cycle and therefore are not considered effectively settled for years after 2004. While this settlement had a $10.1 million pre-tax impact on interest income, it did not have a significant impact on income tax expense. The receivable related to this settlement of $18.1 million was included in current assets - prepayments and other on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2008. NU is actively working to reach resolution of these matters regarding the timing for certain deductions in the remaining open federal tax years. While discussions are currently ongoing with federal and state taxing authorities, for which a change in the unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months is reasonably possible, a range in the outcome could not be determined as of this date.
H.
Other Taxes
Certain excise taxes levied by state or local governments are collected by NU from its customers. These excise taxes are accounted for on a gross basis with collections in revenues and payments in expenses. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, gross receipts taxes, franchise taxes and other excise taxes of $33.9 million and $92.4 million, respectively, were included in operating revenues and taxes other than income taxes on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, these amounts totaled $27 million and $84.9 million, respectively. Certain sales taxes are also collected by the regulated companies from their customers as agents for state and local governments and are recorded on a net basis with no impact on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
2.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (NU, Select Energy, CL&P, PSNH, Yankee Gas)
Contracts that are derivatives and do not meet the requirements to be treated as a cash flow hedge or normal purchase or normal sale are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. For those contracts that meet the definition of a derivative and meet the cash flow hedge requirements, including those related to initial and ongoing documentation, the contract is recorded at fair value and the changes in the fair value of the effective portion of those contracts are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Cash flow hedges include forward interest rate swap agreements on proposed debt issuances. When a cash flow hedge is settled, the settlement amount is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized into earnings over the term of the debt. Cash flow hedges impact net income when the hedged items affect earnings, when hedge ineffectiveness is measured and recorded, or when the forecasted transaction being hedged is improbable of occurring. Derivative contracts designated as fair value hedges and the items they are hedging are both recorded at fair value with changes in fair value of both items recognized in earnings. Derivative contracts that meet the requirements of a normal purchase or sale, and are so designated, are recognized in revenues or expenses, as applicable, when the quantity of the contract is delivered.
The fair value of the company's derivative contracts may not represent amounts that will be realized. For further information on the fair value of derivative contracts, see Note 1C, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements," and Note 3, "Fair Value Measurements," to the condensed consolidated financial statements. On the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, these amounts are recorded as current or long-term derivative assets or liabilities and are summarized as follows:
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Long-Term |
|
Current |
|
Long-Term |
|
Net Totals |
|||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU Enterprises - Wholesale |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
$ |
(18.5) |
|
$ |
(57.3) |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
Regulated Companies - Gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.3 |
Regulated Companies - Electric: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply/Stranded Costs |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
258.1 |
|
|
(45.3) |
|
|
(728.6) |
|
|
(475.8) |
NU Parent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Hedging |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.4 |
Totals |
|
$ |
44.1 |
|
$ |
266.3 |
|
$ |
(64.2) |
|
$ |
(785.9) |
|
$ |
(539.7) |
12
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Long-Term |
|
Current |
|
Long-Term |
|
Net Totals |
|||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU Enterprises - Wholesale |
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
(64.9) |
|
$ |
(72.5) |
|
$ |
(94.0) |
Regulated Companies - Gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.2 |
Interest Rate Hedging |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.9 |
Regulated Companies - Electric: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply/Stranded Costs |
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
290.8 |
|
|
(6.7) |
|
|
(136.0) |
|
|
207.9 |
Interest Rate Hedging |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.3 |
NU Parent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Hedging |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.1 |
Totals |
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
$ |
298.0 |
|
$ |
(71.6) |
|
$ |
(208.5) |
|
$ |
123.4 |
For the regulated companies, except for interest rate swap agreements, offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities are recorded for the changes in fair value of their contracts, as these contracts were part of the stranded costs or are current regulated operating costs, and management believes that these costs will continue to be recovered or refunded in cost-of-service, regulated rates.
The business activities of NU Enterprises that result in the recognition of derivative assets also create exposures to credit risk of energy marketing and trading counterparties. At September 30, 2008, Select Energy, Inc. (Select Energy) had $7.2 million of derivative assets from wholesale activities that are exposed to counterparty credit risk, a significant portion of which is contracted with investment grade entities.
NU Enterprises - Wholesale: Certain electric derivative contracts are part of NU Enterprises' remaining wholesale marketing business. These contracts include short-term and long-term electric supply contracts and a contract to sell electricity to the New York Municipal Power Agency (NYMPA) (an agency that is comprised of municipalities) that expires in 2013. The fair value of the contracts was determined using prices from external sources through 2011 for on-peak and off-peak periods and through 2012 for on-peak periods, except for one contract, under which a portion of the fair value is also determined from a model based on natural gas prices and a heat-rate conversion factor to electricity for off-peak periods in 2012 and for all periods in 2013. The 2007 balances also included a full requirements contract and the related short-term supply contracts to sell electricity to a utility. These full requirements contracts expired on May 31, 2008.
Regulated Companies - Gas - Supply: Yankee Gas's supply derivatives consist of peaking supply arrangements to serve winter load obligations and firm retail sales contracts with options to curtail delivery. These contracts are subject to fair value accounting as these contracts are derivatives that cannot be designated as normal purchases and sales because of the optionality in the contract terms. An offsetting regulatory liability/asset was recorded for these amounts as management believes that these costs will be refunded or recovered in rates.
Regulated Companies - Gas - Interest Rate Hedging: Yankee Gas had a forward interest rate swap agreement to hedge the interest cash outflows associated with its $100 million debt issuance in October 2008. The interest rate swap was based on a 10-year LIBOR swap rate and matched the index used for the debt issuance. As a cash flow hedge, the fair value of the hedge was recorded as a derivative asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007, with an offsetting amount, net of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income. The swap was terminated in September 2008.
Regulated Companies - Electric - Supply/Stranded Costs : CL&P has contracts with two IPPs to purchase power that contain pricing provisions that are not clearly and closely related to the price of power and therefore do not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception. The fair values of these derivatives at September 30, 2008 included a derivative asset with a fair value of $199.3 million and a derivative liability with a fair value of $57.5 million. An offsetting regulatory liability and an offsetting regulatory asset were recorded, as these contracts are part of stranded costs, and management believes that these costs will continue to be recovered or refunded in cost-of-service, regulated rates. At December 31, 2007, the fair values of these derivatives included a derivative asset with a fair value of $311.2 million and a derivative liability with a fair value of $31.8 million.
CL&P has entered into FTR contracts and bilateral basis swaps to limit the congestion costs associated with its standard offer contracts. An offsetting regulatory asset or liability has been recorded as management believes that these costs will be recovered or refunded in rates. At September 30, 2008, the fair value of these contracts was recorded as a derivative asset of $1.6 million on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of these contracts was recorded as a derivative asset of $1.4 million and a derivative liability of $1.3 million on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
13
Pursuant to Public Act 05-01, "An Act Concerning Energy Independence," in August 2007, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) approved two CL&P contracts associated with the capacity of two generating projects to be built or modified. The DPUC also approved two capacity-related contracts entered into by The United Illuminating Company (UI), one with a generating project to be built and one with a new demand response project. The total capacity of these four projects is expected to be approximately 787 megawatts (MW). The contracts, referred to as CfDs, obligate the utilities' customers to pay the difference between a set capacity price and the forward capacity market price that the projects receive in the New England Independent System Operator (ISO-NE) capacity markets for periods of up to 15 years beginning in 2009. As directed by the DPUC, CL&P has an agreement with UI under which it will share the costs and benefits of these four CfDs, with 80 percent to CL&P and 20 percent to UI. The ultimate cost to CL&P under the contracts will depend on the capacity prices that the projects receive in the ISO-NE capacity markets. At September 30, 2008, the fair value of the CL&P CfDs was recorded as a derivative liability of $663.9 million. The fair values of UI's share of the CL&P's contracts and CL&P's share of UI's contracts were recorded as a derivative asset of $86.7 million. An offsetting regulatory asset of $577.2 million was recorded, as management believes these amounts will be recovered from or refunded to customers in cost-of-service, regulated rates. The value of CL&P's CfDs at September 30, 2008 included approximately $100 million of initial gains and losses, previously deferred due to the use of significant unobservable inputs in the valuation, that were recorded upon adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. At December 31, 2007, changes in CfD fair values since inception were recorded as a derivative liability of $107.1 million, and UI's share and one CL&P CfD were recorded as derivative assets of $20.8 million. Offsetting regulatory assets of $86.7 million and regulatory liabilities of $0.4 million were also recorded at December 31, 2007. A 2007 NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) appeal of the DPUC's decision selecting the CfDs was taken into consideration in valuing the CfDs as of December 31, 2007, reducing the net negative derivative values by approximately $215 million. In February 2008, the appeal was denied, which increased derivative liabilities in 2008.
PSNH has electricity procurement contracts that are derivatives. The fair values of these contracts are calculated based on market prices and were recorded as derivative liabilities totaling $52.5 million at September 30, 2008. At December 31, 2007, the fair value was recorded as a derivative asset of $1.5 million and a derivative liability of $2.5 million. An offsetting regulatory asset/liability was recorded as management believes that these costs will be refunded or recovered in rates as the energy is delivered.
PSNH has a contract to assign its transmission rights in a direct current transmission line in exchange for two energy call options which expire in 2010. These energy call options are derivatives that do not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception and are accounted for at fair value based on option value modeling. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the options were recorded as a derivative asset of $10.5 million and $15.7 million, respectively. An offsetting regulatory liability was recorded, as management believes the benefit of this arrangement will be refunded to customers in rates.
Regulated Companies - Electric - Interest Rate Hedging: At December 31, 2007, CL&P had two forward interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest cash outflows associated with its debt issuance of $300 million in May 2008. PSNH had a forward interest rate swap agreement to hedge the interest cash outflows associated with its debt issuance of $110 million in May 2008. Prior to termination in May 2008, the interest rate swaps were based on a 10-year LIBOR swap rate and matched the index used for the debt issuances. As cash flow hedges, the fair values of these hedges were recorded as derivative assets at December 31, 2007 on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet with an offsetting amount, net of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
NU Parent - Interest Rate Hedging: In March 2003, to manage the interest rate characteristics of the company's long-term debt, NU parent entered into a fixed to floating interest rate swap on its $263 million, 7.25 percent fixed rate senior notes that mature on April 1, 2012. Under fair value hedge accounting, the changes in fair value of the swap and the interest component of the hedged long-term debt instrument are recorded in interest expense, which generally offset each other in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The cumulative change in the fair value of the swap and the long-term debt was recorded as a derivative asset and an increase to long-term debt of $4.4 million and $4.2 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
NU parent had a forward interest rate swap agreement to hedge the interest cash outflows associated with its planned debt issuance in June 2008. Prior to termination in June 2008, the interest rate swap was based on a 5-year LIBOR swap rate and a notional amount of $200 million, and matched the index used for the debt issuance. As a cash flow hedge at December 31, 2007, the fair value of the hedge was recorded as a $0.9 million derivative asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet with an offsetting amount, net of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
3.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (All Companies)
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis: The company's assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy in accordance with SFAS No. 157. See Note 1C, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements," for further information regarding the hierarchy and fair value measurements.
14
The following table presents the amounts of assets and liabilities carried at fair value at September 30, 2008 by the level in which they are classified within the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy:
|
|
Total NU |
|
CL&P |
|
PSNH |
|
WMECO |
|
NU
|
|
Yankee Gas |
|
NU Parent |
|||||||
Derivative Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Level 1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Level 2 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.4 |
Level 3 |
|
|
306.0 |
|
|
287.6 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
Total |
|
$ |
310.4 |
|
$ |
287.6 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
4.4 |
Derivative Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Level 2 |
|
|
(52.5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(52.5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Level 3 |
|
|
(797.6) |
|
|
(721.4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(75.8) |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
- |
Total |
|
$ |
(850.1) |
|
$ |
(721.4) |
|
$ |
(52.5) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(75.8) |
|
$ |
(0.4) |
|
$ |
- |
Marketable Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
$ |
38.7 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33.6 |
Level 2 |
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
26.3 |
Level 3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Total |
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
55.7 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
59.9 |
Not included in the table above are $62.6 million of cash equivalents included in cash and cash equivalents on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, which are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. These assets were held in a money market account at September 30, 2008 primarily to repurchase the CL&P PCRBs on October 1, 2008. See Note 10, "Subsequent Events," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The following tables present changes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 in the Level 3 category of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. This category includes derivative assets and liabilities, which are presented net. The derivative amounts at January 1, 2008 reflect the fair values after initial adoption of SFAS No. 157. The company classifies assets and liabilities in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 assets and liabilities typically also rely on a number of inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total NU |
|
CL&P |
|
PSNH |
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|||||
Derivatives, Net : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fair value at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(277.0) |
|
$ |
(244.9) |
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
$ |
(74.6) |
|
$ |
1.6 |
Net realized/unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (1) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
- |
Regulatory assets/liabilities |
|
|
(195.8) |
|
|
(164.1) |
|
|
(30.4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.3) |
Purchases, issuances and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(491.6) |
|
$ |
(433.8) |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
Quarterly change in unrealized gains
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
- |
15
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total NU |
|
CL&P |
|
PSNH |
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|||||
Derivatives, Net : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fair value at January 1, 2008 (2) |
|
$ |
(511.1) |
|
$ |
(426.9) |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
$ |
(100.1) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
Net realized/unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (1) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
- |
Regulatory assets/liabilities |
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
(5.2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
Purchases, issuances and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(491.6) |
|
$ |
(433.8) |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
Period change in unrealized gains
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
- |
(1)
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivatives included in earnings relate to the remaining Select Energy wholesale marketing contracts and are reported in fuel, purchased and net interchange power on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
(2)
Amounts as of January 1, 2008 reflect fair values after initial adoption of SFAS No. 157. As a result of implementing SFAS No. 157, the company recorded an increase to derivative liabilities and a pre-tax charge to earnings of $6.1 million as of January 1, 2008 related to NU Enterprises' remaining derivative contracts. The company also recorded changes in fair value of CL&P's CfD and IPP contracts, resulting in increases to CL&P's derivative liabilities of approximately $590 million, with an offset to regulatory assets and a decrease to CL&P's derivative assets of approximately $30 million with an offset to regulatory liabilities.
4.
PENSION BENEFITS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (All Companies)
NU's subsidiaries participate in a uniform noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan (Pension Plan) covering substantially all regular NU employees and also provide certain health care benefits, primarily medical and dental, and life insurance benefits through a benefit plan to retired employees (post-retirement benefits other than pension (PBOP) Plan). In addition, NU maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) which provides benefits to eligible participants, who are officers of NU, and would have been provided to them under the Pension Plan if certain Internal Revenue Code and other limitations were not imposed.
The components of net periodic expense/(income) for the Pension Plan, PBOP Plan and SERP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
NU |
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
Interest cost |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.5 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(50.0) |
|
|
(48.4) |
|
|
(5.3) |
|
|
(4.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
Net periodic expense - before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Total - net periodic expense |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
16
NU |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
Interest cost |
|
|
108.1 |
|
|
102.8 |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
1.5 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(150.2) |
|
|
(146.8) |
|
|
(15.8) |
|
|
(13.7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.5 |
Net periodic expense - before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Total - net periodic expense |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
A portion of these pension amounts is capitalized related to current employees that are working on capital projects. Amounts capitalized were approximately $1.4 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.4 million and a de minimis amount for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These amounts offset capital costs, as pension income was recorded for certain of NUs subsidiaries.
CL&P |
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Interest cost |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(23.4) |
|
|
(22.5) |
|
|
(2.1) |
|
|
(1.8) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
Net periodic (income)/expense |
|
$ |
(5.3) |
|
$ |
(4.3) |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
CL&P |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Interest cost |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(70.1) |
|
|
(68.2) |
|
|
(6.3) |
|
|
(5.4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Net periodic (income)/expense |
|
$ |
(16.0) |
|
$ |
(11.3) |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
Not included in the pension income amounts above are related intercompany allocations totaling $2 million and $6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $2.6 million and $8.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Excluded from postretirement benefits are related intercompany allocations of $1.7 million and $5.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1.9 million and $5.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Excluded from SERP expenses are related intercompany allocations of $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
For CL&P, a portion of the pension amounts, including intercompany allocations, is capitalized related to current employees that are working on capital projects. Amounts capitalized were $2.1 million and $6.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1.3 million and $3.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These amounts offset capital costs, as pension income was recorded for those periods.
17
PSNH |
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Interest cost |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4.5) |
|
|
(4.4) |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
(0.8) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Net periodic expense |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
PSNH |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
SERP Benefits |
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Interest cost |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(13.4) |
|
|
(13.4) |
|
|
(3.0) |
|
|
(2.5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
Net periodic expense |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
Not included in the pension expense amounts above are related intercompany allocations totaling $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Excluded from postretirement benefits are related intercompany allocations of $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.3 million and $1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Excluded from SERP expenses are related intercompany allocations of $0.1 million and $0.3 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For PSNH, a portion of these pension amounts, including intercompany allocations, is capitalized related to current employees that are working on capital projects. Amounts capitalized were $1.2 million and $3.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1.1 million and $3.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
WMECO |
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
Interest cost |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
1.7 |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5.2) |
|
|
(4.9) |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
(15.6) |
|
|
(15.1) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(1.3) |
Amortization of unrecognized net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.7 |
Net periodic (income)/expense |
|
$ |
(1.5) |
|
$ |
(1.3) |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
(4.6) |
|
$ |
(3.7) |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
A de minimis amount of SERP expense was recorded for WMECO for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Related intercompany allocations of SERP benefits totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Not included in the pension income amounts above are related intercompany allocations totaling $0.3 million and $1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Excluded from postretirement benefits are related intercompany allocations of $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
For WMECO, a portion of these pension amounts, including intercompany allocations, is capitalized related to current employees that are working on capital projects. Amounts capitalized were $0.6 million and $1.7 million for the three and nine months ended
18
September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These amounts offset capital costs, as pension income was recorded for those periods.
5.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
A.
Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters (CL&P, PSNH, WMECO)
Connecticut:
CTA and SBC Reconciliation: The CTA allows CL&P to recover stranded costs, such as securitization costs associated with its rate reduction bonds, amortization of regulatory assets, and IPP over-market costs, while the System Benefits Charge (SBC) allows CL&P to recover certain regulatory and energy public policy costs, such as public education outreach costs, hardship protection costs, transition period property taxes, and displaced worker protection costs.
On March 31, 2008, CL&P filed with the DPUC its 2007 CTA and SBC reconciliation, which compared CTA and SBC revenues to revenue requirements. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, total CTA revenues exceeded CTA revenue requirements by $26.1 million. This amount was recorded as a decrease to the CTA regulatory asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, the SBC cost of service exceeded SBC revenues by $39.4 million. This amount was recorded as a regulatory asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Management expects a decision in this docket from the DPUC by the end of 2008 and does not expect the outcome to have a material adverse effect on CL&P's net income, financial position or cash flows.
Procurement Fee Rate Proceedings: CL&P was allowed to collect a fixed procurement fee of 0.50 mills per kilowatt-hour (KWH) from customers that purchased transitional standard offer (TSO) service from 2004 through the end of 2006. One mill is equal to one tenth of a cent. That fee could increase to 0.75 mills per KWH if CL&P outperforms certain regional benchmarks. CL&P submitted to the DPUC its proposed methodology to calculate the variable incentive portion of the procurement fee and requested approval of $5.8 million in incentive fees. On December 8, 2005, a draft decision was issued in this docket, which accepted the methodology as proposed by CL&P and authorized payment of the pre-tax $5.8 million incentive fee. Subsequent to this draft decision the record was re-opened for numerous inputs. Additional hearings were held on December 10, 2007 and January 30, 2008 and the record was then closed. A date for the new draft decision in this docket has not yet been determined by the DPUC. Management continues to believe that final regulatory approval of the $5.8 million pre-tax amount, which was reflected in 2005 earnings, is probable.
New Hampshire:
ES and SCRC Reconciliation and Rates: On an annual basis, PSNH files with the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) a default energy service charge/stranded cost recovery charge (ES/SCRC) reconciliation filing for the preceding year. On May 1, 2008, PSNH filed its 2007 ES/SCRC reconciliation with the NHPUC. During 2007, ES/SCRC revenues exceeded ES/SCRC costs by $1.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively, and were deferred as a regulatory liability to be refunded to customers. The NHPUC is currently reviewing this filing which includes a prudence review of PSNH's generation operations. Testimony filed on October 24, 2008 by the NHPUC's consultant contained no material adverse findings. Hearings are scheduled before the NHPUC in November 2008. Management does not expect the outcome of the NHPUC review to have a material adverse impact on PSNH's net income, financial position or cash flows.
Massachusetts:
Transition Cost Reconciliation: On July 18, 2008, WMECO filed its 2007 transition cost (TC) reconciliation with the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU), which compared TC revenue and revenue requirements. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, total TC revenues along with carrying charges exceeded TC revenue requirements by $2.6 million, which has been recorded as a regulatory liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. On September 19, 2008, the DPU issued an order of notice for this proceeding, scheduling a public hearing and procedural conference on November 20, 2008. Management does not expect the outcome of the DPU's review of this filing to have a material adverse effect on WMECO's net income, financial position or cash flows.
B.
Long-Term Contractual Arrangements (CL&P)
Estimated Future Annual CL&P Costs : In the third quarter of 2008, UI entered into an additional agreement to purchase energy, capacity and renewable energy credits from a renewable energy facility. CL&P is subject to a sharing agreement with UI, whereby CL&P will share in approximately 80 percent of the costs and benefits of this contract. CL&Ps portion of the costs and benefits of this contract will be paid by or refunded to CL&Ps customers.
19
The estimated future annual payments under this agreement, not including the other renewable energy contracts signed earlier this year, are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|||||||
Renewable energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the estimated future annual costs of CL&P's two signed and approved peaking generation CfDs are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|||||||
CL&P Peaker CfDs |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
$ |
64.0 |
C.
Environmental Matters (HWP)
HWP is a subsidiary of NU that owns a minimal amount of transmission property and has limited operating activities. HWP continues to evaluate additional potential remediation requirements at a river site in Massachusetts containing tar deposits associated with a manufactured gas plant which it sold to Holyoke Gas and Electric (HG&E), a municipal electric utility, in 1902. HWP is at least partially responsible for this site, and has already conducted substantial remediation activities. HWP first established a reserve for this site in 1994. A pre-tax charge of approximately $3 million was recorded in the first nine months of 2008 to reflect the estimated cost of further tar delineation and site characterization studies, as well as certain remediation costs that are considered to be probable and estimable as of September 30, 2008. The cumulative expense recorded to this reserve through September 30, 2008 was approximately $15.9 million, of which $13.3 million had been spent, leaving approximately $2.6 million in the reserve as of September 30, 2008.
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) issued a letter on April 3, 2008 to HWP and HG&E, who share responsibility for the site, providing conditional authorization for additional investigatory and risk characterization activities and providing detailed comments on HWPs 2007 reports and proposals for further investigations. MA DEP also indicated that further removal of tar in certain areas was necessary prior to commencing many of the additional studies and evaluation. This letter represents guidance from the MA DEP, rather than mandates. HWP has developed plans for additional investigations in conformity with MA DEPs guidance letter, including estimated costs and schedules. These matters are subject to ongoing discussions with MA DEP and HG&E and may change from time to time.
At this time, management believes that the $2.6 million remaining in the reserve is at the low end of a range of probable and estimable costs of approximately $2.6 million to $3.3 million and will be sufficient for HWP to conduct the additional tar delineation and site characterization studies, evaluate its approach to this matter and conduct certain soft tar remediation. The additional studies are expected to occur through 2009.
There are many outcomes that could affect management's estimates and require an increase to the reserve, or range of costs, and a reserve increase would be reflected as a charge to pre-tax earnings. However, management cannot reasonably estimate the range of additional investigation and remediation costs because they will depend on, among other things, the level and extent of the remaining tar that may be required to be remediated, the extent of HWPs responsibility and the related scope and timing, all of which are difficult to estimate because of a number of uncertainties at this time. Further developments may require a material increase to this reserve.
HWP's share of the remediation costs related to this site is not recoverable from customers.
20
D.
Guarantees and Indemnifications (All Companies)
NU provides credit assurances on behalf of subsidiaries in the form of guarantees and letters of credit (LOCs) in the normal course of business. NU has also provided guarantees and various indemnifications on behalf of external parties as a result of the sales of Select Energy Services, Inc. (SESI), NU Enterprises' retail marketing business and its competitive generation business. The following table summarizes NU's maximum exposure at September 30, 2008, in accordance with FIN 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others," expiration dates, and fair value of amounts recorded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
On behalf of external parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SESI |
|
General indemnifications in connection with the sale of SESI including completeness and accuracy of information provided, compliance with laws, and various claims |
|
Not Specified |
(1) |
|
None |
|
$ - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific indemnifications in connection with the sale of SESI for estimated costs to complete or modify specific projects |
|
Not Specified |
(1) |
|
Through project completion |
|
$0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnifications to lenders for payment of shortfalls in the event of early termination of government contracts |
|
$1.5 |
|
|
2017-2018 |
|
$0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surety bonds covering certain projects |
|
$10.5 |
|
|
Through project
|
|
$ - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hess Corporation (Retail Marketing Business) |
|
General indemnifications in connection with the sale including compliance with laws, completeness and accuracy of information provided, and various claims |
|
Not Specified |
(1) |
|
None |
|
$ - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Capital Partners (Competitive Generation Business) |
|
General indemnifications in connection with the sale of NGC and the generating assets of Mt. Tom including compliance with tax and environmental laws, and various claims |
|
Not Specified |
(1) |
|
2008-2009 |
|
$ - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On behalf of subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Companies |
|
Surety bonds, primarily for self-insurance |
|
$13.6 |
|
|
None |
|
N/A |
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
$65.0 |
|
|
2009 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky River Realty Company |
|
Lease payments for real estate |
|
$10.1 |
|
|
2024 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUSCO |
|
Lease payments for fleet of vehicles |
|
$9.1 |
|
|
None |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.S. Boulos Company (Boulos) |
|
Surety bonds covering ongoing projects |
|
$36.4 |
|
|
Through project
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGS |
|
Performance guarantee and insurance bonds |
|
$22.1 |
(2) |
|
2020 (2) |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select Energy |
|
Performance guarantees and surety bonds for retail marketing contracts |
|
$3.3 |
(3) |
|
None (4) |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance guarantees for wholesale contracts |
|
$22.0 |
(3) |
|
2013 |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
$2.0 |
|
|
2009 |
|
N/A |
(1)
There is no specified maximum exposure included in the related sale agreements.
(2)
Included in the maximum exposure is $20.9 million related to a performance guarantee of Northeast Generation Services Company (NGS) obligations for which there is no specified maximum exposure in the agreement. The maximum exposure is calculated based on limits on NGS's liability contained in the underlying service contract and assumes that NGS will perform under that contract through its expiration in 2020. The remaining $1.2 million of maximum exposure relates to insurance bonds with no expiration date which are billed annually on their anniversary date.
21
(3)
Maximum exposure is as of September 30, 2008; however, exposures vary with underlying commodity prices and for certain contracts are essentially unlimited.
(4)
NU does not currently anticipate that these remaining guarantees on behalf of Select Energy will result in significant guarantees of the performance of Hess Corporation.
Many of the underlying contracts that NU guarantees, as well as certain surety bonds, contain provisions that would require NU to post collateral in the event that NU's credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade.
In July 2006, under a guarantee of SESI obligations, NU purchased the right to receive contract payments relating to a SESI project that was financed and behind schedule. The carrying value of these assets was $8.8 million at September 30, 2008 and is included in other deferred debits on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. This carrying amount represents the net realizable value of the asset, which is subject to change through SESI's completion of the project. NU may record additional losses associated with this transaction, the amount of which will depend on the amount of project cash available to offset NU's costs and other factors.
6.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (NU, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO, NU Enterprises, Yankee Gas)
Total comprehensive income, which includes all comprehensive income/(loss) items, net of tax and by category, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
$ |
54.2 |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
(2.3) |
|
$ |
(3.3) |
Comprehensive (loss)/income items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
|
(0.1) |
Decrease in unrealized gains on securities |
|
|
(0.9) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.6) |
Pension, SERP, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
70.8 |
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
(3.4) |
|
$ |
(4.0) |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
(3.4) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
Comprehensive (loss)/income items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified cash flow hedging items |
|
|
(5.2) |
|
|
(4.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Decrease in unrealized gains on securities |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.6) |
Pension, SERP, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
(3.4) |
|
$ |
(3.5) |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
$ |
(38.3) |
Comprehensive (loss)/income items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(7.0) |
|
|
(3.5) |
|
|
(1.4) |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.2) |
|
|
(0.8) |
Decrease in unrealized gains on securities |
|
|
(1.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.2) |
Pension, SERP, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
182.4 |
|
$ |
140.2 |
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
$ |
(39.3) |
22
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU
|
|
Yankee
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
8.6 |
Comprehensive income/(loss) items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(6.8) |
|
|
(6.2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
Increase/(decrease) in unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, SERP, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
175.6 |
|
$ |
85.4 |
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
8.0 |
*After preferred dividends of subsidiary.
Comprehensive income amounts included in the Other column primarily relate to NU parent and Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO).
Accumulated other comprehensive income fair value adjustments in NU's qualified cash flow hedging instruments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
Hedged transactions recognized into earnings |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
(7.0) |
|
|
- |
Cash flow transactions entered into for the period |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
(3.8) |
Net change associated with hedging transactions |
|
|
(7.0) |
|
|
(3.6) |
Total fair value adjustments included in accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the forward starting interest rate swap transactions entered into by the company, CL&P, PSNH and Yankee Gas to hedge interest rate risk associated with their respective long-term debt issuances and terminated in March, May, June and September 2008:
|
|
NU Parent |
|
|
CL&P |
|
|
PSNH |
|
|
Yankee Gas |
|
Long-term debt issued (in millions) |
|
$250 |
|
|
$300 |
|
|
$110 |
|
|
$100 |
|
Date issued |
|
June 5, 2008 |
|
|
May 27, 2008 |
|
|
May 27, 2008 |
|
|
October 7, 2008 |
|
Term |
|
5-year |
|
|
10-year |
|
|
10-year |
|
|
10-year |
|
Loaded LIBOR swap percentage
|
|
|
|
|
4.590 and 4.602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Charge to accumulated other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
The interest rate swap was entered into with a notional amount of $200 million.
(2)
The two locked rates reflect two forward starting interest rate swap transactions, each with a notional amount of $150 million.
(3)
The first swap transaction was entered into in December 2007 and was replaced at its scheduled termination date in March 2008 with a new swap to extend the hedging relationship to the revised pricing date of the long-term debt in May 2008.
(4)
The first swap transaction was entered into in December 2007 and was replaced at its scheduled termination date in September 2008 with a new swap to extend the hedging relationship to the revised pricing date of the long-term debt in October 2008. On September 26, 2008, the debt was priced and the second swap was unwound.
(5)
The charge to accumulated other comprehensive income will be amortized into earnings over the terms of each respective long-term debt.
(6)
The amount charged to accumulated other comprehensive income is net of ineffectiveness of $0.2 million related to the settlement of the March 2008 forward starting swap agreement.
23
It is estimated that a charge of $0.2 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as a decrease to earnings over the next 12 months as a result of amortization of amounts due to forward interest rate swap agreements that have been settled. At September 30, 2008, it is estimated that a pre-tax $0.1 million included in the accumulated other comprehensive income balance will be reclassified as an increase to earnings over the next 12 months related to Pension, SERP and other postretirement benefits adjustments.
7.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (NU, NU Enterprises)
NU's condensed consolidated statements of income present NGC, Mt. Tom and SECI as discontinued operations. Under discontinued operations presentation, revenues and expenses of the businesses classified as discontinued operations are classified in loss from discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of income, for all periods presented.
Summarized information for the discontinued operations is as follows:
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
||||
Operating revenues |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1.2 |
Operating expenses |
|
- |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.9) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.3 |
(Losses)/gains from sale/disposition of
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) from
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.2 |
The gain on sale/disposition of discontinued operations of $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to the favorable resolution of contingencies from the completion of a cogeneration plant by SESI, which was sold in May of 2006, partially offset by charges related to the sale of the competitive generation business, including a $1.9 million charge in the first quarter resulting from a purchase price adjustment from the sale of the competitive generation business.
No intercompany revenues were included in discontinued operations for either of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
At September 30, 2008, NU did not have and does not expect to have significant ongoing involvement or continuing cash flows with the entities presented in discontinued operations.
8.
EARNINGS PER SHARE (NU)
Earnings per share (EPS) is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, excluding unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares, during each period. Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the potential dilutive effect if certain securities are converted into common stock. There were no antidilutive options for any of the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
24
The following table sets forth the components of basic and fully diluted EPS:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars, Except for Share Information) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
$ |
172.6 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.2 |
Net income |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
$ |
173.8 |
Basic EPS common shares outstanding (average) |
|
|
155,607,201 |
|
|
154,930,930 |
|
|
155,456,606 |
|
|
154,672,270 |
Dilutive effect |
|
|
490,440 |
|
|
489,309 |
|
|
448,265 |
|
|
538,434 |
Fully diluted EPS common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
$ |
1.12 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
$ |
1.12 |
Fully Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
$ |
1.11 |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.01 |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
$ |
1.12 |
The dilutive effect of restricted share units (RSUs) granted but not issued is calculated using the treasury stock method. Assumed proceeds of RSUs under the treasury stock method consist of the remaining compensation cost to be recognized and a theoretical tax benefit. The theoretical tax benefit is calculated as the tax impact of the intrinsic value of the RSUs (the difference between the market value of RSUs using the average market price during the period and the grant date market value).
The dilutive effect of stock options is also calculated using the treasury stock method. Assumed proceeds for stock options consist of remaining compensation cost to be recognized, cash proceeds that would be received upon exercise, and a theoretical tax benefit. The theoretical tax benefit is calculated as the tax impact of the intrinsic value of the stock options (the difference between the market value of the common shares underlying the stock options outstanding for the period using the average market price and the exercise price on the date of grant).
Allocated ESOP shares are included in basic common shares outstanding in the above table.
9.
SEGMENT INFORMATION (All Companies)
Presentation: NU is organized between the regulated companies and NU Enterprises' businesses based on a combination of factors, including the characteristics of each business' products and services, the sources of operating revenues and expenses and the regulatory environment in which each segment operates. Cash flows for total investments in plant included in the segment information below are cash capital expenditures that do not include amounts incurred but not paid, cost of removal, AFUDC and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income. Segment information for all periods presented has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, except as indicated.
The regulated companies segments, including the electric distribution, generation and transmission segments, as well as the gas distribution segment (Yankee Gas), represented approximately 99 percent of NU's total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 96 percent for the 2007 periods. CL&P's, PSNH's and WMECO's complete condensed consolidated financial statements are included in this combined quarterly report on Form 10-Q. PSNH's distribution segment includes generation activities. Also included in this combined quarterly report on Form 10-Q is detailed information regarding CL&P's, PSNH's, and WMECO's transmission segments.
The NU Enterprises segment is comprised of the following: 1) Select Energy (wholesale contracts), 2) NGS, 3) Boulos, and 4) NU Enterprises parent.
Other in the segment tables primarily consists of 1) the results of NU parent, which include other income related to the equity in earnings of NU parent's subsidiaries and interest income from the NU Money Pool, which are both eliminated in consolidation, and interest income and expense related to the cash and debt of NU parent, respectively, 2) the revenues and expenses of NUSCO, most of which are eliminated in consolidation, and 3) the results of other subsidiaries, which include The Rocky River Realty Company and The Quinnehtuk Company (real estate subsidiaries), Mode 1 Communications, Inc., the non-utility subsidiaries of Yankee Energy System, Inc. (Yankee Energy Services Company, Yankee Energy Financial Services Company and NorConn Properties, Inc.) and the remaining operations of HWP that were not exited as part of the sale of the competitive generation business.
25
NU's condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 present the remaining activity for NGC, Mt. Tom and SECI as discontinued operations. For further information and information regarding the exit from these businesses, see Note 7, "Discontinued Operations," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
NU's segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (certain amounts presented in the financial statements may differ from amounts presented in the segment schedules due to rounding):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Regulated Companies |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Distribution (1) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
NU Enterprises |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|||||||||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,283.8 |
|
$ |
92.3 |
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
$ |
106.2 |
|
$ |
(108.5) |
|
$ |
1,506.9 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(161.9) |
|
|
(6.7) |
|
|
(12.8) |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
(184.2) |
||
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,044.4) |
|
|
(84.5) |
|
|
(36.4) |
|
|
(16.4) |
|
|
(96.1) |
|
|
104.2 |
|
|
(1,173.6) |
||
Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
(4.1) |
|
|
149.1 |
||
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(41.8) |
|
|
(5.1) |
|
|
(14.4) |
|
|
(1.3) |
|
|
(10.9) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
(70.9) |
||
Interest income |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
12.0 |
||
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
(33.1) |
|
|
5.7 |
||
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(7.5) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
(16.6) |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(21.8) |
||
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(0.9) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.4) |
||
Net income |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
$ |
(2.3) |
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
$ |
(37.2) |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Regulated Companies |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Distribution (1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
NU Enterprises |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,580.6 |
|
$ |
404.9 |
|
$ |
306.3 |
|
$ |
87.0 |
|
$ |
306.3 |
|
$ |
(332.9) |
|
$ |
4,352.2 |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(427.7) |
|
|
(19.7) |
|
|
(35.1) |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
(10.0) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
(492.3) |
|||
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(2,915.0) |
|
|
(346.1) |
|
|
(101.6) |
|
|
(70.8) |
|
|
(332.2) |
|
|
325.3 |
|
|
(3,440.4) |
|||
Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
(35.9) |
|
|
(7.0) |
|
|
419.5 |
|||
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(122.0) |
|
|
(15.2) |
|
|
(39.7) |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
(25.9) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
(199.6) |
|||
Interest income |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
(8.4) |
|
|
14.5 |
|||
Other income, net |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
143.4 |
|
|
(143.3) |
|
|
27.1 |
|||
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(31.3) |
|
|
(9.1) |
|
|
(49.2) |
|
|
(3.7) |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
|
(68.4) |
|||
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(2.7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4.2) |
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
$ |
103.6 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
114.0 |
|
$ |
(152.3) |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|||
Total assets (2) |
|
$ |
11,081.3 |
|
$ |
1,326.8 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
48.9 |
|
$ |
4,377.7 |
|
$ |
(4,171.0) |
|
$ |
12,663.7 |
|||
Cash flows for total
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Regulated Companies |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Distribution (1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
NU Enterprises |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,243.3 |
|
$ |
71.7 |
|
$ |
72.9 |
|
$ |
68.3 |
|
$ |
93.2 |
|
$ |
(98.4) |
|
$ |
1,451.0 |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(116.6) |
|
|
(6.8) |
|
|
(9.6) |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
(134.0) |
|||
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,043.4) |
|
|
(64.3) |
|
|
(29.0) |
|
|
(65.9) |
|
|
(87.6) |
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
(1,193.6) |
|||
Operating income |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
123.4 |
|||
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(43.2) |
|
|
(5.1) |
|
|
(8.9) |
|
|
(1.9) |
|
|
(8.3) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
(61.8) |
|||
Interest income |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
(5.6) |
|
|
3.5 |
|||
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
(26.6) |
|
|
7.3 |
|||
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(11.1) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
(9.2) |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
(0.9) |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(20.8) |
|||
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.4) |
|||
Income/(loss) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income from
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|||
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
31.9 |
|
$ |
(3.4) |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
$ |
(27.7) |
|
$ |
50.2 |
26
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Regulated Companies |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Distribution (1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
NU Enterprises |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,784.7 |
|
$ |
351.5 |
|
$ |
214.7 |
|
$ |
220.4 |
|
$ |
287.1 |
|
$ |
(312.1) |
|
$ |
4,546.3 |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(312.7) |
|
|
(18.4) |
|
|
(27.8) |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(6.1) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
(362.5) |
|||
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(3,230.6) |
|
|
(303.9) |
|
|
(84.4) |
|
|
(206.0) |
|
|
(269.3) |
|
|
306.3 |
|
|
(3,787.9) |
|||
Operating income |
|
|
241.4 |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
|
395.9 |
|||
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(127.1) |
|
|
(13.6) |
|
|
(26.0) |
|
|
(7.1) |
|
|
(25.4) |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
(180.6) |
|||
Interest income |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
(18.4) |
|
|
15.4 |
|||
Other income, net |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
(111.4) |
|
|
21.3 |
|||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(35.7) |
|
|
(6.2) |
|
|
(27.4) |
|
|
(1.8) |
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(75.2) |
|||
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(3.0) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4.2) |
|||
Income from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income from
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
89.6 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
57.0 |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
$ |
124.1 |
|
$ |
(115.5) |
|
$ |
173.8 |
|||
Cash flows for total
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1)
Includes PSNH's generation activities.
(2)
Information for segmenting total assets between electric distribution and transmission is not available at September 30, 2008. On an NU consolidated basis, these distribution and transmission assets are disclosed in the electric distribution columns above.
The regulated companies information related to the distribution and transmission segments for CL&P, PSNH and WMECO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
CL&P - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
891.0 |
|
$ |
89.5 |
|
$ |
980.5 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(123.9) |
|
|
(10.3) |
|
|
(134.2) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(720.6) |
|
|
(27.5) |
|
|
(748.1) |
Operating income |
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
98.2 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(25.7) |
|
|
(12.4) |
|
|
(38.1) |
Interest income |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
7.8 |
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
5.3 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3.5) |
|
|
(14.1) |
|
|
(17.6) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(0.9) |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(1.4) |
Net income |
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
$ |
54.2 |
|
|
CL&P - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,444.8 |
|
$ |
243.1 |
|
$ |
2,687.9 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(332.7) |
|
|
(27.9) |
|
|
(360.6) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,975.5) |
|
|
(74.2) |
|
|
(2,049.7) |
Operating income |
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
277.6 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(75.4) |
|
|
(34.1) |
|
|
(109.5) |
Interest income |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
10.4 |
Other income, net |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
24.4 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(14.6) |
|
|
(40.4) |
|
|
(55.0) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(2.7) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(4.2) |
Net income |
|
$ |
57.2 |
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
$ |
143.7 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
200.6 |
|
$ |
478.0 |
|
$ |
678.6 |
27
|
|
CL&P - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
862.5 |
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
$ |
918.4 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(73.0) |
|
|
(7.4) |
|
|
(80.4) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(745.0) |
|
|
(21.6) |
|
|
(766.6) |
Operating income |
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
71.4 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(28.0) |
|
|
(7.6) |
|
|
(35.6) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
1.1 |
Other income, net |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
6.5 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2.2) |
|
|
(6.2) |
|
|
(8.4) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
(1.4) |
Net income |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
CL&P - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,668.0 |
|
$ |
164.5 |
|
$ |
2,832.5 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(211.6) |
|
|
(21.5) |
|
|
(233.1) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(2,324.2) |
|
|
(60.9) |
|
|
(2,385.1) |
Operating income |
|
|
132.2 |
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
214.3 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(82.0) |
|
|
(21.6) |
|
|
(103.6) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
3.4 |
Other income, net |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
17.0 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(14.8) |
|
|
(20.5) |
|
|
(35.3) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(3.0) |
|
|
(1.2) |
|
|
(4.2) |
Net income |
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
$ |
47.3 |
|
$ |
91.6 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
166.5 |
|
$ |
383.6 |
|
$ |
550.1 |
|
|
PSNH - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution (1) |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
286.9 |
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
$ |
301.0 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(26.5) |
|
|
(1.9) |
|
|
(28.4) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(237.1) |
|
|
(6.1) |
|
|
(243.2) |
Operating income |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
29.4 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(11.8) |
|
|
(1.6) |
|
|
(13.4) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2.3 |
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.4 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2.9) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(4.4) |
Net income |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
PSNH - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution (1) |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
822.8 |
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
$ |
866.8 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(61.2) |
|
|
(5.3) |
|
|
(66.5) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(687.6) |
|
|
(18.4) |
|
|
(706.0) |
Operating income |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
94.3 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(33.6) |
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
(37.5) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
3.0 |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
2.3 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(11.1) |
|
|
(6.3) |
|
|
(17.4) |
Net income |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
$ |
44.7 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
101.5 |
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
$ |
164.8 |
28
|
|
PSNH - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution (1) |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
272.8 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
$ |
284.3 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(32.6) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(34.1) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(212.6) |
|
|
(4.9) |
|
|
(217.5) |
Operating income |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
32.7 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(10.9) |
|
|
(0.8) |
|
|
(11.7) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5.8) |
|
|
(2.3) |
|
|
(8.1) |
Net income |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
PSNH - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution (1) |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
778.2 |
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
$ |
811.7 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(70.3) |
|
|
(4.4) |
|
|
(74.7) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(633.4) |
|
|
(15.3) |
|
|
(648.7) |
Operating income |
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
88.3 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(31.9) |
|
|
(2.9) |
|
|
(34.8) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.5 |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
1.1 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(12.0) |
|
|
(4.9) |
|
|
(16.9) |
Net income |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
$ |
38.2 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
71.9 |
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
$ |
113.1 |
(1)
Includes PSNH's generation activities.
|
|
WMECO - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
105.9 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
112.3 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(11.4) |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
(12.1) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(86.8) |
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
(89.4) |
Operating income |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
10.8 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
(4.7) |
Interest income |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
1.1 |
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
(1.1) |
|
|
(2.1) |
Net income |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
WMECO - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
313.2 |
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
$ |
332.3 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(33.8) |
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
(35.8) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(252.1) |
|
|
(8.8) |
|
|
(260.9) |
Operating income |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
35.6 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(13.1) |
|
|
(1.6) |
|
|
(14.7) |
Interest income |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.7 |
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5.6) |
|
|
(2.5) |
|
|
(8.1) |
Net income |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
14.8 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
$ |
49.6 |
29
|
|
WMECO - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
108.1 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
113.5 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(11.0) |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
(11.6) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(85.8) |
|
|
(2.5) |
|
|
(88.3) |
Operating income |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
13.6 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(4.8) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.2 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3.0) |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
(3.7) |
Net income |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
WMECO - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Distribution |
|
Transmission |
|
Total |
|||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
338.7 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
355.4 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(30.8) |
|
|
(1.9) |
|
|
(32.7) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(273.2) |
|
|
(8.2) |
|
|
(281.4) |
Operating income |
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
41.3 |
Interest expense, net of AFUDC |
|
|
(13.2) |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
(14.7) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.6 |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.7 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9.0) |
|
|
(2.1) |
|
|
(11.1) |
Net income |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
16.8 |
Cash flows for total investments in plant |
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
$ |
32.8 |
10.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 7, 2008, Yankee Gas issued $100 million of Series J first mortgage bonds with a coupon rate of 6.9 percent and a maturity date of October 1, 2018. The proceeds from this issuance will be used to repay short-term debt, to fund ongoing capital investment programs and for general working capital purposes.
On October 1, 2008, CL&P reacquired $62 million of PCRBs that had a fixed rate mode which terminated effective September 30, 2008. The reacquisition of the PCRBs will be accounted for as a reduction of the September 30, 2008 balance of long-term debt - current portion.
30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Northeast Utilities:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 2008, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Notes 1.C. and 3., the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , as of January 1, 2008.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of capitalization of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 28, 2008 (which report included an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 , as of January 1, 2007), we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ |
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Hartford, Connecticut
November 7, 2008
31
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
32
34
35
36
37
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
38
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
39
40
41
42
43
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
44
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
45
46
47
48
49
NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries combined first and second quarter 2008 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries combined 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K (NU 2007 Form 10-K) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). References in this Form 10-Q to "NU" or "the company" are to Northeast Utilities combined with its subsidiaries, and the terms "we," "us" and "our" refer to NU. All per share amounts are reported on a fully diluted basis.
The only common equity securities that are publicly traded are common shares of NU. The earnings per share (EPS) of each segment discussed below does not represent a direct legal interest in the assets and liabilities allocated to such segment but rather represents a direct interest in our assets and liabilities as a whole. EPS by segment is a measure not recognized under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) that is calculated by dividing the net income or loss of each segment by the average fully diluted NU common shares outstanding for the period. We use this measure to provide segmented earnings guidance and believe that this measurement is useful to investors to evaluate the actual financial performance and contribution of our business segments. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to our consolidated fully diluted EPS determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance.
The discussion below also references our 2008 earnings and EPS excluding a significant charge resulting from the settlement of litigation with Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison), which are also non-GAAP measures. We use these non-GAAP measures to more fully explain and compare the 2008 and 2007 results without including the impact of this settlement. Due to the nature and significance of the settlement charge, management believes that this non-GAAP presentation is more representative of our performance and provides additional and useful information to investors in analyzing historical and future performance. These measures should not be considered as alternatives to our reported net income or EPS determined in accordance with GAAP as indicators of our operating performance.
Reconciliations of the above non-GAAP measures to most directly comparable GAAP measures of consolidated fully diluted EPS and net income are included under "-Financial Condition and Business Analysis-Overview-Consolidated" and "-Financial Condition and Business Analysis-Future Outlook."
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND BUSINESS ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
The following items in this executive summary are explained in more detail in this quarterly report:
Results, Strategy and Outlook:
·
We earned $72.7 million, or $0.47 per share, in the third quarter of 2008, compared with $50.2 million, or $0.32 per share, in the third quarter of 2007. The results in 2008 included regulated companies net income, after payment of preferred dividends, of $71.4 million, or $0.46 per share, competitive businesses or NU Enterprises, Inc. (NU Enterprises) net income of $4.6 million, or $0.03 per share, and NU parent and other companies net losses of $3.3 million, or $0.02 per share.
·
We earned $188.9 million, or $1.21 per share, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $173.8 million, or $1.12 per share, in the first nine months of 2007. The 2008 results included regulated companies net income, after payment of preferred dividends, of $218.5 million, or $1.40 per share, competitive businesses net income of $8.7 million or $0.05 per share, and NU parent and other companies net losses of $38.3 million, or $0.24 per share. The regulated companies net income includes earnings of $6.9 million, or $0.04 per share, primarily related to federal tax matters. The NU parent and other companies loss includes an after-tax charge of $29.8 million, or $0.19 per share, resulting from the settlement of litigation with Con Edison. Excluding that charge, our earnings in the first nine months of 2008 were $218.7 million, or $1.40 per share.
·
Earnings of the distribution segments of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P), Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) (including regulated generation), Western Massachusetts Electric Company (WMECO) and Yankee Gas Services Company (Yankee Gas) totaled $35.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $114.9 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $28.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 and $100.1 million in the first nine months of 2007.
50
·
The transmission segments of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO earned $35.9 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $103.6 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $20 million in the third quarter of 2007 and $57 million in the first nine months of 2007.
·
CL&P expects to have substantially completed its remaining major transmission projects in southwest Connecticut by the end of 2008. Refer to "Business Development and Capital Expenditures Regulated Companies Transmission Segment" in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
·
We continue to project consolidated 2008 earnings of between $1.60 per share and $1.75 per share, including the effect of the litigation settlement with Con Edison, and between $1.80 per share and $1.95 per share excluding it. We project consolidated 2009 earnings of between $1.80 per share and $2.00 per share, including earnings at the distribution and generation segment of between $1.00 per share and $1.10 per share, earnings at the transmission segment of between $0.85 per share and $0.90 per share, earnings at the remaining competitive businesses of between $0.00 per share and $0.05 per share, and a loss of $0.05 per share at NU parent and other companies. We also continue to project an average compounded annual EPS growth rate of between 8 percent and 11 percent over 2007 EPS through 2013. Refer to "Future Outlook" in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
·
We have an opportunity to make up to approximately $7 billion in capital investments from 2009 through 2013, which would enable us to increase our regulated transmission, distribution and generation rate base from approximately $6.5 billion up to $11.4 billion during this period. These estimates assume that our major projects, including the New England East-West Solutions (NEEWS) projects, are approved and completed according to our present schedule. Given the current market conditions, we continue to carefully examine each investment to assess customer benefits, shareholder benefits and the ability to raise necessary capital.
Legal, Regulatory and Other Items :
·
On September 17, 2008, we and National Grid USA jointly submitted a filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) seeking incentives on NEEWS transmission upgrade components currently estimated to cost about $1.41 billion. The filing requests 100 percent construction work in progress (CWIP) cash recovery through rates, an incentive return on equity (ROE) of 13.14 percent and recovery of prudently incurred costs associated with project elements that may be cancelled for reasons outside of our control. We requested the FERC to rule on this filing within 60 days.
·
As of October 2008, CL&P had entered into three contracts for differences (CfDs) with developers of peaking generation units approved by the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC). These units will have a total of 506 megawatts (MW) of peaking capacity. As directed by the DPUC, CL&P and The United Illuminating Company (UI) will share the net costs and benefits of the CfDs on a basis of 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively. CL&Ps portion of the costs and benefits will be paid by or refunded to its customers.
Liquidity :
·
Despite the volatility of the current financial markets, we believe our liquidity position is adequate to fund our operations and capital plans in the near term. Our companies have modest collateral or margin call risks. Our short-term funding needs are predictable, and we do not rely on a commercial paper program, but rather utilize the borrowing availability under our bank credit facilities. We also have only one series of bonds maturing before 2012 ($50 million in the second quarter of 2009). The credit outlooks for NU parent and our regulated companies are all stable. Capital expenditures projected for 2009 are less than 2008. We also expect a $100 million increase in internally-generated cash flows in 2009, which are projected to be approximately $550 million. We project our internally-generated cash flows to grow to $1 billion by 2013. Under our current projections, external financings totaling $550 million to $650 million are planned for mid-2009. Refer to "Liquidity-Impact of Financial Market Conditions" in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
·
On October 7, 2008, we concluded our total 2008 financing plan of $760 million with the issuance by Yankee Gas of $100 million of first-mortgage bonds. Proceeds of the issuances will be used to repay debt, to fund ongoing capital investment programs and for general working capital purposes.
·
As of November 5, 2008, we had approximately $86 million of externally invested cash. At this time, we also had approximately $285 million of borrowing availability on our revolving credit lines.
51
·
Our cash capital expenditures totaled $951.8 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $750.2 million in the first nine months of 2007. The increase in our cash capital expenditures was primarily the result of higher transmission segment capital expenditures, particularly at CL&P. We project total capital expenditures of $1.3 billion in 2008.
·
After giving effect to rate reduction bond payments included in financing activities, cash flows provided by operations in the first nine months of 2008 were $248 million, which represents an increase of $342 million from the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to the absence in 2008 of approximately $400 million in tax payments related to the 2006 sale of the competitive generation business, partially offset by the litigation settlement payment to Con Edison of $49.5 million in 2008. We project that we will generate approximately $450 million of cash flows from operations in 2008 after repayment of rate reduction bonds. Refer to "Liquidity-Consolidated" in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
Overview
Consolidated: We earned $72.7 million, or $0.47 per share, in the third quarter of 2008 and $188.9 million, or $1.21 per share, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $50.2 million, or $0.32 per share, in the third quarter of 2007 and $173.8 million, or $1.12 per share, in the first nine months of 2007. Excluding an after-tax charge of $29.8 million, or $0.19 per share, associated with the settlement of litigation with Con Edison, our earnings in the first nine months of 2008 were $218.7 million, or $1.40 per share. A summary of our earnings by segment, which also reconciles the non-GAAP measures of consolidated non-GAAP earnings and EPS, as well as EPS by segment, to the most directly comparable GAAP measures of consolidated net income and fully diluted EPS, for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
Per Share |
|
Amount |
|
Per Share |
|
Amount |
|
Per Share |
|
Amount |
|
|
Per Share |
|||||||
Net Income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated companies |
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
$ |
157.1 |
|
$ |
1.02 |
Competitive businesses |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
0.05 |
NU parent and other companies |
|
|
(3.3) |
|
|
(0.02) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
(8.5) |
|
|
(0.05) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
0.05 |
Non-GAAP earnings |
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
218.7 |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
173.8 |
|
|
1.12 |
Con Edison litigation charge |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(29.8) |
|
|
(0.19) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Net Income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
$ |
1.12 |
Regulated Companies: Our regulated companies, which consist of CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas, segment their earnings between their electric transmission segment and their electric and gas distribution segments, with PSNH generation included with the electric distribution segment. A summary of regulated company earnings by segment for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
CL&P Transmission* |
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
$ |
47.3 |
PSNH Transmission |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
6.5 |
WMECO Transmission |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
3.2 |
Total Transmission |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
103.6 |
|
|
57.0 |
CL&P Distribution* |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
44.3 |
PSNH Distribution and Generation |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
31.7 |
WMECO Distribution |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
13.6 |
Yankee Gas |
|
|
(2.3) |
|
|
(3.4) |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
10.5 |
Total Distribution and Generation |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
100.1 |
Net Income - Regulated Companies |
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
$ |
157.1 |
*After preferred dividends in all periods.
The higher third quarter and year-to-date 2008 transmission segment earnings reflect a higher level of investment in this segment as we continue to build out our transmission infrastructure to meet the regions reliability needs. CL&Ps transmission earnings increased primarily due to CL&Ps significant ongoing investment in projects in southwest Connecticut. Year-to-date 2008 transmission segment results also included first quarter earnings of approximately $3.5 million associated with an order on rehearing issued by the FERC on March 24, 2008 concerning the ROE allowed to owners of New England electric transmission facilities, including CL&P, PSNH and WMECO. Third quarter and year-to-date 2007 transmission segment results included a $2 million after-tax charge related to a FERC order concerning allowed transmission returns during a 15-month period that ended on September 3, 2006.
52
CL&Ps third quarter 2008 distribution segment earnings were $6.8 million higher than the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher distribution revenues resulting from the distribution rate increase effective February 1, 2008, a settlement on federal tax matters, and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by a 2.7 percent reduction in sales and higher operating costs.
For the first nine months of 2008, CL&Ps distribution segment earnings were $12.9 million higher than the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher distribution revenues, a settlement on federal tax matters, higher other revenues resulting from financial incentives under Connecticuts 2005 "Act Concerning Energy Independence" to promote distributed generation and demand side management, and a lower effective income tax rate. These items were partially offset by a 3.6 percent reduction in sales and higher operating costs. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, CL&Ps distribution segment Regulatory ROE was 7.8 percent. We expect CL&P to achieve a distribution segment Regulatory ROE close to 8 percent in calendar year 2008.
PSNHs third quarter 2008 distribution and generation segment earnings were $0.3 million lower than the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher operating costs and a 2.2 percent decrease in sales, primarily offset by a settlement on federal tax matters and a lower effective income tax rate.
PSNHs distribution and generation segment earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $0.6 million higher than the same period in 2007 as a result of distribution rate increases effective on July 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008, a pre-tax adjustment to its generation segment cost recovery mechanism of $1.9 million, higher generation segment rate base, and a settlement of federal tax matters, primarily offset by higher operating costs, the absence of a $4.5 million pre-tax benefit from the implementation of the retail transmission cost tracking mechanism in the second quarter of 2007, and a 1.1 percent decrease in sales. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, PSNHs combined distribution and generation segment Regulatory ROE was 8.8 percent. We expect PSNH to achieve a combined distribution and generation Regulatory ROE close to 9 percent in calendar year 2008.
WMECOs third quarter 2008 distribution segment earnings were $0.6 million lower than the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher operating costs, a $1.4 million pre-tax charge for potential refunds to customers from an assessment under the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities' (DPU) service quality index criteria, and a 5.6 percent decline in sales. These items were partially offset by a settlement of federal tax matters and a $3 million annualized distribution rate increase that took effect on January 1, 2008.
WMECOs distribution segment earnings for the first nine months of 2008 were $3.5 million lower than the same period in 2007 primarily due to higher operating costs, a second quarter $1.6 million pre-tax charge related to a DPU ruling on WMECOs 2005 and 2006 transition charge reconciliations, the $1.4 million pre-tax charge described above, and lower sales, partially offset by a settlement of federal tax matters and a distribution rate increase effective January 1, 2008. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, WMECOs distribution segment Regulatory ROE was 7.9 percent. We expect WMECO to achieve a distribution Regulatory ROE close to 8 percent in calendar year 2008.
Yankee Gas lost $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to a loss of $3.4 million in the same period of 2007. The improvement in 2008 results was primarily due to a 13 percent increase in firm natural gas sales and lower income taxes, partially offset by higher operating costs. For the first nine months of 2008, Yankee Gass earnings were $4.8 million higher than the same period in 2007, primarily due to a rate increase that took effect July 1, 2007, partially offset by a $5.8 million pre-tax charge recorded in the second quarter of 2008 for refunds of previous gas cost recoveries, and higher operating costs. Yankee Gass year-to-date 2008 earnings were also impacted by weather as actual sales were unchanged from 2007, but on a weather normalized basis, 2008 sales were 2.9 percent higher. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2008, Yankee Gass Regulatory ROE was 8.7 percent. We expect Yankee Gas to achieve a Regulatory ROE close to 8 percent in calendar year 2008.
53
For the distribution segment of our regulated companies, a summary of changes in CL&P, PSNH and WMECO retail electric kilowatt-hour (KWH) sales and Yankee Gas firm natural gas sales for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007 on an actual and weather normalized basis (using a 30-year average) is as follows:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Electric |
|
Firm Natural Gas |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
CL&P |
|
PSNH |
|
WMECO |
|
Total |
|
Yankee Gas |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
Residential |
|
(3.3)% |
|
(0.5)% |
|
(2.6)% |
|
0.9 % |
|
(4.5)% |
|
(2.6)% |
|
(3.3)% |
|
(0.4)% |
|
8.1% |
|
4.6% |
Commercial |
|
(1.4)% |
|
0.2 % |
|
(0.8)% |
|
1.7 % |
|
(4.6)% |
|
(3.4)% |
|
(1.6)% |
|
0.2 % |
|
11.1% |
|
8.5% |
Industrial |
|
(4.8)% |
|
(3.4)% |
|
(4.5)% |
|
(2.0)% |
|
(9.7)% |
|
(9.0)% |
|
(5.4)% |
|
(3.8)% |
|
15.8% |
|
15.4% |
Other |
|
(4.2)% |
|
(4.2)% |
|
3.7 % |
|
3.7 % |
|
(7.1)% |
|
(7.1)% |
|
(3.9)% |
|
(3.9)% |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
Total |
|
(2.7)% |
|
(0.6)% |
|
(2.2)% |
|
0.7 % |
|
(5.6)% |
|
(4.2)% |
|
(2.9)% |
|
(0.7)% |
|
13.0% |
|
11.3% |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Electric |
|
Firm Natural Gas |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
CL&P |
|
PSNH |
|
WMECO |
|
Total |
|
Yankee Gas |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
|
|
|
Weather
|
Residential |
|
(4.0)% |
|
(2.4)% |
|
(1.5)% |
|
0.1 % |
|
(3.6)% |
|
(2.2)% |
|
(3.5)% |
|
(1.8)% |
|
(5.6)% |
|
(1.5)% |
Commercial |
|
(1.3)% |
|
(0.7)% |
|
0.8 % |
|
1.9 % |
|
(2.0)% |
|
(1.5)% |
|
(0.9)% |
|
(0.2)% |
|
(2.2)% |
|
1.4 % |
Industrial |
|
(8.9)% |
|
(8.4)% |
|
(4.6)% |
|
(3.6)% |
|
(8.0)% |
|
(7.7)% |
|
(7.6)% |
|
(7.0)% |
|
8.1 % |
|
9.0 % |
Other |
|
(4.6)% |
|
(4.6)% |
|
1.9 % |
|
1.9 % |
|
(4.6)% |
|
(4.6)% |
|
(4.2)% |
|
(4.2)% |
|
0.0 % |
|
0.0 % |
Total |
|
(3.6)% |
|
(2.5)% |
|
(1.1)% |
|
0.1 % |
|
(3.9)% |
|
(3.1)% |
|
(3.0)% |
|
(2.0)% |
|
0.0 % |
|
2.9 % |
A summary of our retail electric sales in gigawatt hours for CL&P, PSNH and WMECO and firm natural gas sales in million cubic feet for Yankee Gas for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||
|
|
Electric |
|
Firm Natural Gas |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Percentage
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Percentage
|
Residential |
|
10,947 |
|
11,339 |
|
(3.5)% |
|
8,930 |
|
9,462 |
|
(5.6)% |
Commercial |
|
11,335 |
|
11,440 |
|
(0.9)% |
|
8,890 |
|
9,086 |
|
(2.2)% |
Industrial |
|
3,914 |
|
4,235 |
|
(7.6)% |
|
9,684 |
|
8,960 |
|
8.1 % |
Other |
|
246 |
|
257 |
|
(4.2)% |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.0 % |
Total |
|
26,442 |
|
27,271 |
|
(3.0)% |
|
27,504 |
|
27,508 |
|
0.0 % |
Third quarter and year-to-date 2008 electric sales were lower than the same periods in 2007. The third quarter and year-to-date 2008 weather normalized decreases of 0.7 percent and 2 percent reflect the fact that our customers are responding to the volatile costs of energy and to the economic conditions of our region and the nation. We believe customers will continue to respond to these factors and to the recent developments in the financial markets, and as a result, our weather normalized sales for the full year are projected to be 2.3 percent lower than 2007 sales, as compared to our original plan for a 0.4 percent increase.
A significant portion of electric revenues are tracked and reconciled to actual costs and a large portion of the distribution rate revenues (CL&P - 66 percent, PSNH - 48 percent, WMECO - 64 percent) are recovered through charges that are not dependent on overall sales volumes.
Firm natural gas sales for the third quarter of 2008 were higher than the same period in 2007 and, for the first nine months of 2008, were unchanged from the prior year. The 2008 results reflect warmer weather in the first quarter and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to customer-owned gas-fired distributed generation. Similar to our electric distribution companies, Yankee Gas recovers a portion of its distribution revenues through charges that are not dependent on usage. Yankee Gas would recover almost half of its
54
revenues (45 percent) through non-usage charges if the DPUC approves its latest rate design proposal. The change in rate design would equate to approximately $175 thousand of distribution revenue for each 1 percent change in sales.
We continue to monitor our electric and firm natural gas sales closely and while we cannot determine whether the current trends will continue in the future, we have assumed a zero to 2 percent decline in weather normalized electric sales for 2009 and an increase in weather normalized firm natural gas sales for 2009 of approximately 1 percent. These assumptions are reflected in our earnings guidance for 2009.
Our uncollectibles expense is influenced by the economic conditions of our region and our write-offs as a percentage of revenues increased in 2008 for all of our electric distribution companies. For the first nine months of 2008, our total uncollectibles expense was approximately $10 million higher than the same period in 2007, but the impact on 2008 results was lower due to certain costs that are tracked such as write-offs attributable to hardship customers and the portion of uncollectibles expense allocated to the energy supply rate for the electric distribution companies. For the year, we believe the non-tracked portion of our uncollectibles expense will be approximately $6 million higher than we originally expected.
Competitive Businesses: NU Enterprises, which continues to manage to completion its remaining wholesale marketing contracts and energy services activities, earned $4.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $8.7 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2007 and $8.1 million in the first nine months of 2007. Year-to-date 2008 results include an after-tax reduction of earnings of $2.8 million associated with the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, net of a $0.9 million benefit from partially reversing the SFAS No. 157 implementation charge as we served rather than exited Select Energy Inc.s (Select Energy) wholesale marketing contracts in 2008. Competitive business earnings for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 included positive mark-to-market results of $3.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively, associated with the wholesale marketing contracts, as compared to negative mark-to-market results of $1.5 million and $2.8 million in the same periods of 2007, respectively.
NU Parent and Other Companies: NU parent and other companies had losses of $3.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $38.3 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with earnings of $1 million in the third quarter of 2007 and $8.6 million in the first nine months of 2007. The loss in the first nine months of 2008 primarily relates to the payment by NU parent to Con Edison of $49.5 million in March 2008 as part of a comprehensive settlement of litigation initiated in 2001 over the proposed but unconsummated merger between the two companies. The decrease in earnings from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 was also the result of reduced interest income for NU parent on a significantly lower level of cash in 2008. NU parent carried a high level of cash in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from the sale of our competitive generation businesses on November 1, 2006. Most of that cash was either invested in the regulated companies in 2007 to support those companies capital programs or used to pay taxes due in March 2007 on the competitive generation business sales. Additionally, NU parent interest expense increased in the third quarter of 2008 due to the replacement of $150 million of 3.3 percent senior notes that matured on June 1, 2008 with $250 million of 5.65 percent senior notes.
Future Outlook
Earnings Guidance : A summary of our projected 2008 and 2009 EPS by segment, which also reconciles consolidated fully diluted EPS to the non-GAAP measures of non-GAAP consolidated EPS and EPS by segment, is as follows:
|
|
2008 EPS Range |
|
2009 EPS Range |
||||||||
(Approximate amounts) |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
Fully Diluted EPS (GAAP) |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution and generation segment |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
Transmission segment |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
0.90 |
Total regulated companies |
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
2.00 |
Competitive businesses |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
0.05 |
NU parent and other companies (excluding Con Edison
|
|
|
(0.10) |
|
|
(0.10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP EPS |
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
2.00 |
Con Edison litigation charge |
|
|
(0.19) |
|
|
(0.19) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Fully Diluted EPS (GAAP) |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
55
We expect earnings to be at the high end of the range for the competitive businesses in 2008. The 2009 guidance is comparable to 2008, excluding the Con Edison charge, due to several negative factors, including the impact of the current economy on electric and gas sales and near-term pension expenses, and additional NU shares projected to be outstanding, offset by higher transmission earnings, scheduled rate relief at CL&P in February and expected rate relief at PSNH in July. We expect our electric distribution segment companies to earn a Regulatory ROE of approximately 7 percent to 8.5 percent for 2009, with PSNH generation and Yankee Gas earning approximately 9 percent to 10 percent.
Long-Term Growth Rate: We continue to project that we can achieve an average compounded annual EPS growth rate of between 8 percent and 11 percent over 2007 earnings of $1.59 per share through 2013. This EPS growth rate assumes achieved Regulatory ROEs of approximately 12 percent for transmission and between 9 percent and 10 percent for generation and distribution investments. We believe this growth can be achieved if our capital program is successfully deployed according to our plans, distribution rate cases are approved to earn reasonable Regulatory ROEs, transmission policies by the FERC remain consistent to achieve projected transmission ROEs and we execute new transmission solutions.
Business Development and Capital Expenditures
Consolidated: Our consolidated capital expenditures, including amounts incurred but not paid, cost of removal, allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC), and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income, totaled $946.6 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $842.1 million in the first nine months of 2007.
Regulated Companies:
We expect capital expenditures for the regulated companies to total $1.3 billion in 2008, which includes $22 million related to our corporate service company and other affiliated companies that support the regulated companies. We have an opportunity to make up to approximately $7 billion in regulated company capital investments from 2009 through 2013. Given the current market conditions, we continue to carefully examine each investment to assess customer benefits, shareholder benefits and the ability to raise necessary capital.
A summary of the projected capital expenditures for the regulated companies transmission and the distribution and generation segments by company for 2008 and 2009 through 2013, including our corporate service companies capital expenditures on behalf of regulated companies, is as follows (millions of dollars):
|
|
Year |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
2009-2013
|
|||||||
CL&P Transmission |
|
$ |
577 |
|
$ |
119 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
$ |
322 |
|
$ |
160 |
|
$ |
996 |
PSNH Transmission |
|
|
85 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
273 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
1,073 |
WMECO Transmission |
|
|
45 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
121 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
306 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
857 |
Other Transmission |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
20 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
205 |
|
|
205 |
|
|
525 |
Totals - Transmission |
|
|
707 |
|
|
227 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
602 |
|
|
3,451 |
CL&P Distribution |
|
|
292 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
352 |
|
|
338 |
|
|
309 |
|
|
311 |
|
|
1,590 |
PSNH Distribution |
|
|
101 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
117 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
117 |
|
|
555 |
WMECO Distribution |
|
|
35 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
166 |
Totals - Electric Distribution |
|
|
428 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
505 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
456 |
|
|
462 |
|
|
2,311 |
PSNH Generation |
|
|
69 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
199 |
|
|
144 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
590 |
Yankee Gas Distribution |
|
|
62 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
404 |
Corporate service companies |
|
|
22 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
151 |
Totals |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
$ |
892 |
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
$ |
1,732 |
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
$ |
6,907 |
56
Actual capital expenditures could vary from the projected amounts for the companies and periods above. Based on those estimated expenditures, projected transmission and distribution and generation rate base at December 31 of each year are as follows (millions of dollars):
|
|
Year |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
||||||
CL&P Transmission |
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
$ |
2,433 |
|
$ |
2,454 |
PSNH Transmission |
|
|
278 |
|
|
314 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
666 |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
1,189 |
WMECO Transmission |
|
|
99 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
729 |
|
|
876 |
Other Transmission |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
525 |
Totals - Transmission |
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
5,044 |
CL&P Distribution |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
2,971 |
PSNH Distribution |
|
|
699 |
|
|
774 |
|
|
865 |
|
|
954 |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
1,095 |
WMECO Distribution |
|
|
390 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
478 |
|
|
497 |
Totals - Electric Distribution |
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
4,371 |
|
|
4,563 |
PSNH Generation |
|
|
369 |
|
|
389 |
|
|
394 |
|
|
404 |
|
|
876 |
|
|
872 |
Yankee Gas Distribution |
|
|
680 |
|
|
712 |
|
|
739 |
|
|
793 |
|
|
851 |
|
|
890 |
Totals |
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
$ |
7,565 |
|
$ |
8,708 |
|
$ |
10,349 |
|
$ |
11,369 |
The projected capital expenditures and rate base amounts reflected above assume that PSNHs Clean Air Project will be completed by the end of 2012 at a cost of $457 million. They also assume that $1.49 billion in transmission projects associated with NEEWS will be completed before the end of 2013. Other Transmission capital expenditures and rate base amounts represent our potential investment in a transmission line to Canada.
Transmission Segment: Transmission segment capital expenditures increased by $84.5 million in the first nine months of 2008 as compared with 2007 primarily due to expenditures at CL&P, which continues its significant enhancement of its transmission system in southwest Connecticut. A summary of transmission segment capital expenditures by company in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007 is as follows (millions of dollars):
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
CL&P |
|
$ |
486.4 |
|
$ |
429.9 |
PSNH |
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
47.0 |
WMECO |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
12.3 |
HWP |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
0.8 |
Totals |
|
$ |
574.5 |
|
$ |
490.0 |
CL&P has two major transmission projects currently under construction in southwest Connecticut. They are:
·
The 69-mile, 345 kilovolt (KV)/115 KV transmission project from Middletown to Norwalk, Connecticut (Middletown-Norwalk) being constructed jointly with UI. CL&P's portion of this project is currently expected to cost approximately $950 million, $100 million lower than the earlier estimate of $1.05 billion due to a decrease in capitalized financing costs because of the earlier-than-expected in service date. Included in the above 2008 and 2009 projected capital expenditures are $330 million and $22 million, respectively, of the total cost of this project. The 45-mile overhead section of the project entered service on August 28, 2008. Extensive testing and commissioning of the 24-mile underground section is being conducted in the fourth quarter of 2008 and, absent any unanticipated events, the underground portion will be in service by early 2009. As of October 31, 2008, CL&P's portion of this project was 99 percent complete. As of September 30, 2008, CL&P had capitalized $885 million associated with this project and placed $429 million into service.
·
The two-cable, nine-mile, 115 KV underground transmission project between Norwalk and Stamford, Connecticut (Glenbrook Cables). This project is estimated to cost approximately $239 million, which is $16 million higher than previous estimates due to increased construction costs to remove underground obstacles. As of October 31, 2008, this project was 98 percent complete and is expected to be completed ahead of schedule in November 2008. As of September 30, 2008, CL&P had capitalized $227 million associated with this project and placed $60 million into service.
In addition, the replacement 138 KV, 11-mile undersea electric transmission cable between Norwalk, Connecticut and Northport-Long Island, New York (Long Island Replacement Cable) was placed into service on July 29, 2008. The project was temporarily taken out of service to bury the New York portion of the cable, which was completed in September 2008. This project is considered complete, subject to review and acceptance of as-built drawings by state and federal permit authorities. Based on final allocations, CL&P owns 51 percent of the project, with Long Island Power Authority owning the remainder. Due to this ownership re-allocation from 50.1
57
percent and higher than anticipated costs for the final cable burial, CL&P's portion of the project is anticipated to be approximately $78 million, which represents a $7 million increase over the previous estimate. As of September 30, 2008, CL&P had capitalized $71 million associated with this project and placed $67 million into service.
In addition to our current transmission construction in southwest Connecticut, we continue to plan for our next series of major transmission projects, NEEWS. That series of projects involves our construction of new overhead 345 KV lines in Massachusetts and Connecticut as well as associated substation work and 115 KV rebuilds. One of the projects will connect to a new transmission line that National Grid plans to build in Rhode Island. On September 24, 2008, the New England Independent System Operator (ISO-NE) issued its final technical approval of the NEEWS projects, which allows us to start the siting application process. We estimate that CL&Ps and WMECOs total capital expenditures for these projects will be $1.49 billion through 2013.
The first of the NEEWS projects, the Greater Springfield Reliability Project, which involves a 115 KV/345 KV line from Ludlow, Massachusetts to North Bloomfield, Connecticut, is the largest and most complicated project within NEEWS. This project is expected to cost approximately $714 million if built according to our preferred route and configuration. CL&P filed its application to build the Connecticut portion of the Greater Springfield Reliability Project with the Connecticut Siting Council on October 20, 2008. WMECO filed its application to build its portion of the project with the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board on October 27, 2008. If approved as expected in 2010, we expect to commence construction in late 2010 and place the project in service by mid-2013.
Our second major NEEWS project is the Interstate Reliability Project, which is being designed and built in coordination with National Grid. CL&P's share of this project includes a 40-mile 345 KV line from Lebanon, Connecticut to the Connecticut-Rhode Island border where it would connect with enhancements National Grid is designing. We expect CL&P's share of this project to cost approximately $250 million. Municipal consultations began in September 2008, and CL&P plans to file siting applications with Connecticut regulators by the end of 2008 or early 2009 with construction beginning in 2010. We expect the project to be placed in service as early as late 2012.
The third part of NEEWS is the Central Connecticut Reliability Project, which involves construction of a new line from Bloomfield, Connecticut to Watertown, Connecticut. This line would provide us with another 345 KV connection to move power into southwest Connecticut, where approximately half of the states electricity is consumed. The timing of this project would be six to twelve months behind the other two projects, and CL&P expects to initiate the siting process in 2009 with construction beginning in 2011. The project is expected to be placed in service in 2013 with a cost of approximately $315 million.
Included as part of NEEWS are approximately $210 million of reliability related expenditures, many of which may be incurred in advance of the three major projects.
During the siting approval process, state regulators may require changes in configuration to address local concerns that could increase construction costs. Our current design for NEEWS does not contemplate any underground 345 KV lines. Building 345 KV lines underground would increase total costs, and our estimate could be increased during the siting approval process.
Distribution Segment: A summary of distribution segment capital expenditures by company in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007 is as follows (millions of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
CL&P |
|
$ |
202.4 |
|
$ |
192.1 |
PSNH |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
66.1 |
WMECO |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
23.0 |
Totals - Electric Distribution |
|
|
292.6 |
|
|
281.2 |
Yankee Gas |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
44.0 |
Other |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.1 |
Totals |
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
$ |
325.3 |
On February 15, 2008, Yankee Gas and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) entered into a settlement agreement, which, among other things, enabled the recovery of approximately $17.5 million of capital costs and expenses incurred by Yankee Gas related to an NRG subsidiary's generating plant construction project that was abandoned. Year-to-date 2008 capital expenditures at Yankee Gas were reduced by this $17.5 million recovery, while the 2007 capital expenditures included $11 million spent on its $108 million LNG storage and production facility in Waterbury, Connecticut, which was placed in service in July 2007.
PSNH Generation: Capital expenditures for PSNH generation were $39.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to $18.6 million for the same period in the prior year. PSNHs Clean Air Project is expected to cost approximately $457 million, which will be recovered through its generation rates under New Hampshire law. PSNH expects to start preliminary site work
58
for this project in November 2008, with completion of the project scheduled in 2012. New Hampshire law requires this project to be operational by July 2013. Capital expenditures at PSNH for the first nine months of 2008 include $11.4 million in costs related to this project.
Liquidity
Consolidated: We had $82.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand at September 30, 2008, compared with $15.1 million at December 31, 2007. This increase in cash balances was due to CL&P's temporary need for cash-on-hand of $62 million at September 30, 2008 to acquire certain of its Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (PCRBs) on October 1, 2008. As of November 5, 2008, we had approximately $86 million of externally invested cash. Refer to "Impact of Financial Market Conditions" below for further discussion.
We had positive operating cash flows of $248 million, after rate reduction bond payments included in financing activities, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with negative operating cash flows of $93.8 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2007. This increase was primarily due to the absence in 2008 of approximately $400 million in tax payments related to the 2006 sale of the competitive generation business, partially offset by the litigation settlement payment to Con Edison of $49.5 million in 2008. After factoring these cash flow impacts, the decrease in operating cash flows in 2008 from 2007 was primarily due to a reduction in regulatory refunds and underrecoveries (net of income tax impacts) and a net reduction in other working capital items resulting primarily from a net $100 million increase in accounts receivable and unbilled revenue items, which also included investments in securitizable assets. Our consolidated regulatory refunds and underrecoveries decreased by $31 million from the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a $33 million deferral adjustment in the third quarter of 2008 for differences in transmission costs related to the Schedule 21 rates.
We project consolidated operating cash flows of approximately $450 million in 2008, after rate reduction bond payments of approximately $231 million. This projection includes an expected income tax net settlement of approximately $70 million in the fourth quarter and a reduction in income tax payments of $35 million during 2008 related to bonus depreciation.
A summary of the current credit ratings and outlooks by Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) for NU parent's and WMECOs senior unsecured debt and CL&P's and PSNH's first mortgage bonds is as follows:
|
|
Moody's |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
||||||
|
|
Current |
|
Outlook |
|
Current |
|
Outlook |
|
Current |
|
Outlook |
NU Parent |
|
Baa2 |
|
Stable |
|
BBB- |
|
Stable |
|
BBB |
|
Stable |
CL&P |
|
A3 |
|
Stable |
|
BBB+ |
|
Stable |
|
A- |
|
Stable |
PSNH |
|
Baa1 |
|
Stable |
|
BBB+ |
|
Stable |
|
BBB+ |
|
Stable |
WMECO |
|
Baa2 |
|
Stable |
|
BBB |
|
Stable |
|
BBB+ |
|
Stable |
On July 29, 2008, Moody's changed the outlook of Yankee Gas to stable from negative and affirmed the company's Baa2 corporate credit rating. On August 8, 2008, Fitch Ratings affirmed all of its ratings and outlooks on NU parent, CL&P, PSNH and WMECO. In late October 2008, S&P affirmed all of its ratings and outlooks on NU parent, CL&P, PSNH and WMECO. On November 5, 2008, S&P raised CL&P's unsecured debt rating to BBB from BBB- as a result of a comprehensive review of the unsecured ratings of United States investment grade utilities. S&P's ratings on CL&P's bonds and preferred stock were unaffected.
If NU parents senior unsecured debt ratings were to be reduced to a sub-investment grade level by either Moody's or S&P, a number of Select Energy's supply contracts would require Select Energy to post additional collateral in the form of cash or letters of credit (LOCs). Select Energy would, under its remaining contracts, be required to provide cash or LOCs in the amount of $20.2 million to various unaffiliated counterparties and collateral or LOCs in the amount of $5.8 million to several independent system operators, in each case at September 30, 2008. If such a downgrade were to occur, NU parent would be able to provide that collateral. If unsecured debt ratings for CL&P or PSNH were to be reduced by either Moody's or S&P, a number of supply contracts would require CL&P and PSNH to post additional collateral in the form of cash or LOCs to various unaffiliated counterparties. If these ratings were to be reduced below investment grade, the amount of collateral required to be posted by CL&P and PSNH would be $2.3 million and $14 million, respectively, at September 30, 2008. If such a downgrade were to occur, CL&P and PSNH would be able to provide that collateral.
NU paid common dividends of $95.8 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $89.7 million in the first nine months of 2007. The increase reflects a 6.7 percent increase in NU's common dividend that took effect in the third quarter of 2007 and another 6.25 percent increase that took effect in the third quarter of 2008. On October 14, 2008, our Board of Trustees approved a quarterly common dividend of $0.2125 per share, payable on December 31, 2008 to shareholders of record as of December 1, 2008.
Beginning in 2009, we will target a dividend payout ratio of approximately 50 percent with a goal to continue our policy of increasing the dividend at a rate above industry average and to provide an attractive return to shareholders. In general, the regulated companies
59
pay approximately 60 percent of their cash earnings to NU parent in the form of common dividends. In the first nine months of 2008, CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas paid $79.8 million, $27.3 million, $10.1 million, and $19 million, respectively, in common dividends to NU parent. In the first nine months of 2008, NU parent contributed $137.4 million of equity to CL&P, $46.6 million to PSNH, $16.3 million to WMECO, and $20.8 million to Yankee Gas.
NUs ability to pay common dividends is subject to approval by the Board of Trustees and our future earnings and cash flow requirements, and is not regulated under the Federal Power Act, but may be limited by certain state statutes, the leverage restrictions in its revolving credit agreement and the ability of its subsidiaries to pay common dividends. Unless a higher amount is approved by the FERC, the Federal Power Act limits the payment of dividends by CL&P, PSNH and WMECO to their respective retained earnings balances, and PSNH is required to reserve an additional amount under its FERC hydroelectric license conditions. In addition, certain state statutes may impose additional limitations on the regulated companies. CL&P, PSNH, WMECO and Yankee Gas also are parties to a revolving credit agreement that imposes leverage restrictions.
Cash capital expenditures included on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and described in the liquidity section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis do not include amounts incurred on capital projects but not yet paid, cost of removal, the AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income. Our cash capital expenditures totaled $951.8 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $750.2 million in the first nine months of 2007. Our cash capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2008 included $678.6 million by CL&P, $164.8 million by PSNH, $49.6 million by WMECO, $39.1 million by Yankee Gas and $19.7 million by other NU subsidiaries. The increase in our cash capital expenditures was primarily the result of higher transmission segment capital expenditures, particularly at CL&P.
NU Parent: NU parent has a credit line in a nominal aggregate amount of $500 million that expires on November 6, 2010. At September 30, 2008, NU parent had $67 million of LOCs issued for the benefit of certain subsidiaries and $182 million of borrowings outstanding under that facility. We have approximately $238 million of borrowing availability on this facility as of November 5, 2008.
Regulated Companies: The regulated companies maintain a joint credit facility in a nominal aggregate amount of $400 million that expires on November 6, 2010. There were $45 million of long-term borrowings and $260.2 of short-term borrowings outstanding under that facility at September 30, 2008. We have approximately $47 million of borrowing availability on this facility as of November 5, 2008.
Impact of Financial Market Conditions: Despite the volatility of the current financial markets, we believe our liquidity position is adequate to fund our operations and capital plans in the near term. Due to our business model, our companies have modest collateral or margin call risks, as described further below. Our short-term funding needs are predictable, and we do not rely on a commercial paper program but rather utilize the borrowing availability under our bank credit facilities. The credit outlooks for NU parent and our regulated companies are all stable, with all their ratings and outlooks affirmed by S&P in late October 2008. Our dividend increases have been higher than the industry average growth rate over the past eight years; however, our dividend payout ratio has been less than 50 percent. Capital expenditures projected for 2009 are approximately 30 percent less than 2008 and debt maturities in 2009 are minimal, as described below. We also expect a $100 million increase in internally-generated cash flows in 2009, which are projected to be approximately $550 million. We project our internally-generated cash flows to grow to $1 billion by 2013. Under our current projections, the external financings described below are planned for mid-2009.
We have successfully completed our planned 2008 long-term debt financings, and we continue to have access to our two revolving credit facilities in a nominal aggregate amount of $900 million, both of which are due to expire in November 2010. The lenders under these facilities are: Bank of America, N.A.; Barclays Bank PLC; BNY Mellon, N.A.; Citigroup Inc.; HSBC Bank USA, N.A.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank (LBCB); Sumitomo Bank; Toronto Dominion (Texas) LLC; Union Bank of California, N.A.; Wachovia Bank, N.A.; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the parent of LBCB, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in September 2008. LBCB's original aggregate lending commitment under the facilities was $85 million, of which $30 million was assigned to Sumitomo Bank in late September, at which time LBCB had advanced approximately $23.5 million under the facilities. LBCB subsequently declined to fund the remainder of its commitment. As a result, when current loans from LBCB are repaid, we will be limited to an aggregate of $845 million of borrowing capacity under our credit facilities, which we believe will be sufficient to meet our near term liquidity needs. We have no further exposure to Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. or any of its affiliates. As of September 30, 2008, we had borrowed an aggregate of approximately $487 million under the credit facilities, and $497 million as of November 5, 2008, including $23.5 million from LBCB. At the latter date, NU parent also had $62 million of LOCs issued under the NU parent credit facility for the benefit of certain subsidiaries.
We successfully accessed the credit markets in October 2008 when Yankee Gas issued in a private placement $100 million of 6.9 percent first mortgage bonds due in 2018. Yankee Gas plans to use the net proceeds to repay its borrowings under the regulated companies credit facility, to fund ongoing capital investment programs and for general working capital purposes.
60
PSNH has outstanding approximately $407 million of PCRBs, one series of which, in the aggregate principal amount of $89.3 million, bears interest at a rate that is periodically set pursuant to auctions. Since March 2008, a significant majority of this series of PCRBs has been held by remarketing agents as the result of failed auctions due to concerns about the credit worthiness of the attached bond insurer. The interest rate on these PCRBs has reset by formula under the applicable documents every 35 days and has been between 0.4 percent and 4 percent since March 2008. The formula is based on a combination of the ratings on the PCRBs and an index rate, which provides for a current interest rate of 0.4 percent. We are not obligated to purchase these PCRBs, which mature in 2021, from the remarketing agents. In addition, CL&P has one series of PCRBs in the aggregate principal amount of $62 million, which had a fixed interest rate for a five-year period that expired on September 30, 2008. CL&P chose to acquire these PCRBs on October 1, 2008 as a result of poor liquidity in the tax-exempt market using funds obtained from its credit facility and the NU Money Pool. These PCRBs, which mature in 2031, have not been retired, and CL&P expects to remarket them when conditions in the market improve.
We project that our capital expenditures will be $892 million in 2009, which is approximately 30 percent less than 2008 because we are between major transmission projects. We also project that cash flows from operations after rate reduction bond payments will increase by approximately $100 million from 2008 to 2009 due to our southwest Connecticut transmission projects being reflected fully in rates in 2009, lower refunds of the previous years overcollections , a $20 million retail rate increase at CL&P, and the impact in 2008 of the Con Edison settlement. Also, only one series of our bonds matures prior to 2012, which is an aggregate principal amount issued by Yankee Gas of $50 million maturing in the second quarter of 2009. Due to these factors, we expect to require significantly less debt financing in 2009 than in 2008 (approximately $300 million to $350 million compared to $760 million in 2008). We also continue to assume a common share issuance of approximately $250 million to $300 million in 2009. The proceeds from these financings would be primarily used to fund our capital programs. We will monitor market conditions to determine the right timing and amount of 2009 financing requirements.
Our regulated standard offer type contracts do not require us to post collateral. The regulated companies continue to solicit bids on wholesale power contracts, the collateral terms of which are expected to be consistent with existing contracts. In other regulated contracts, the counterparties are generally exposed to us at this time, and these counterparties have posted the necessary collateral in the past when required. We do not expect these requirements to adversely affect our liquidity.
An affiliate of Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (Constellation), whose credit ratings were recently downgraded due to liquidity and other concerns, provides a significant amount of energy under CL&Ps standard offer contracts. As of September 30, 2008, CL&P is not exposed to Constellation in terms of credit risk, and Constellation is performing on specific contracts that, in the event of Constellations default, would require CL&P to provide standard offer type services directly to customers until a substitute supplier could be arranged. Any additional costs incurred by CL&P would be recoverable from customers. If Constellation were to default under existing contracts within the next 12 months, CL&P could be subject to the temporary posting of additional collateral up to between $35 million to $40 million with ISO-NE based on forward market prices as of September 30, 2008.
In addition, in 2005, Select Energy assigned a wholesale contract to Constellation. While Select Energy is not exposed to Constellation in terms of credit risk, Select Energy would be required to perform under the contract if Constellation defaults. We do not believe that this is likely, as Constellation is performing its obligations under the contract and the contract ends on December 31, 2008. Select Energy has no further significant exposure to Constellation.
Our collateral requirements for Select Energys few remaining wholesale contracts are modest as we continue to wind down this business. Select Energys largest remaining contract does not contain any collateral posting requirements. In addition, we have not experienced any significant performance difficulties with suppliers on Select Energys remaining sourcing contracts. Select Energy is required to post collateral, primarily with the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), based on the market prices and status of its sourcing contracts. As of September 30, 2008, Select Energy had posted $11.6 million in related collateral, as compared to $18.9 million at December 31, 2007. Refer to "NU Enterprises Contracts Counterparty Credit Risk" in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for further discussion.
Our pension plan has historically been well funded, and we have not made a contribution to the plan since 1991. As of December 31, 2007, the fair value of our pension plan assets was approximately $2.5 billion, which exceeded the $2.3 billion projected benefit obligation by approximately $200 million. Due to current market conditions, the fair value of our pension plan assets is substantially lower now than it was at the end of 2007. At September 30, 2008, the fair value of our pension plan assets was approximately $2 billion. If the fair value of pension plan assets remains at or near this level at December 31, 2008, then we will be required to make a contribution to the plan of approximately $100 million to meet minimum funding requirements. The fair value of our pension plan assets continues to be subject to market volatility, and funding requirements could change accordingly. This contribution would not be required until the 2009 tax return is filed in the third quarter of 2010. The significant majority of our pension expense is recoverable from customers of our regulated companies.
61
Transmission Rate Matters and FERC Regulatory Issues
CL&P, PSNH and WMECO and most other New England utilities, generation owners and marketers are parties to a series of agreements that provide for coordinated planning and operation of the region's generation and transmission facilities and the market rules by which these parties participate in the wholesale markets and acquire transmission services. Under these arrangements, ISO-NE, a non-profit corporation whose board of directors and staff are independent from all market participants, has served as the Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) for New England since February 1, 2005. ISO-NE works to ensure the reliability of the New England transmission system, administers the independent system operator tariff (ISO Tariff), subject to FERC approval, oversees the efficient and competitive functioning of the regional wholesale power market and determines the portion of the costs of our major transmission facilities that are regionalized throughout New England.
Transmission - Wholesale Rates: Wholesale transmission revenues are based on formula rates that are approved by the FERC. Most of our wholesale transmission revenues are collected under the ISO-NE FERC Electric Tariff No. 3, Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff (Tariff No. 3). Tariff No. 3 includes Regional Network Service (RNS) and Schedule 21 rate schedules to recover fees for transmission and other services. The RNS rate, administered by ISO-NE and billed to all New England transmission users, is reset on June 1 st of each year and recovers the revenue requirements associated with transmission facilities that benefit the New England region. The Schedule 21 rate, which we administer, is reset on January 1 st and June 1 st of each year and recovers the revenue requirements for local transmission facilities and other transmission costs not recovered under the RNS rate, including 50 percent of the CWIP that is included in rate base on the remaining two southwest Connecticut projects (Middletown-Norwalk and Glenbrook Cables). The Schedule 21 rate calculation recovers total transmission revenue requirements net of revenues received from other sources (i.e., RNS, rentals, etc.), thereby ensuring that we recover all regional and local revenue requirements as prescribed in Tariff No. 3. Both the RNS and Schedule 21 rates provide for annual true-ups to actual costs. The financial impacts of differences between actual and projected costs are deferred for future recovery from or refund to customers. In the third quarter of 2008, under the terms of Tariff No. 3, we deferred $33 million of differences, which resulted in the Schedule 21 rates being in a total underrecovery position of approximately $1 million as of September 30, 2008, which will fluctuate period to period.
FERC ROE Decision: On March 24, 2008, the FERC issued an order on rehearing increasing the base ROE on transmission projects for the transmission owners from the 10.2 percent allowed in the Initial ROE Order to 10.4 percent effective February 1, 2005 and reaffirmed its Initial ROE Order increasing the ROE by 74 basis points for the period beginning November 1, 2006 in recognition of higher bond yields. The rehearing order also modified the FERC's Initial ROE Order provision allowing 100 additional basis points for new transmission projects that are built as part of the ISO-NE Regional System Plan by limiting the 100 basis points adder solely to projects that are "completed and on line" by December 31, 2008. In order to receive incentives for projects completed after December 31, 2008, the rehearing order requires transmission owners to file with the FERC project-specific requests that meet the nexus requirements under FERC guidelines. In addition, while not an issue in this rehearing, the provision of the Initial ROE Order increasing the ROE by 50 additional basis points for New England transmission owners joining an RTO and giving the RTO operational control of the transmission owners transmission facilities was left unchanged. In the first quarter of 2008, we recognized $3.5 million in transmission segment earnings related to this order, of which approximately $2.9 million related to the February 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007 time period. This order has been appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals by various state regulators and municipal utilities. The court has set a schedule for the briefing to be concluded in the second quarter of 2009, with no date set for argument.
On May 16, 2008, CL&P filed an application with the FERC to receive ROE incentives for its Middletown-Norwalk project and to seek a waiver of the "completed and on line" date of December 31, 2008 to earn incentives. On July 17, 2008, the FERC granted a waiver of the December 31, 2008 "completed and on line" date for a 100 basis point ROE adder and approved the 100 basis point incentive for the entire Middletown-Norwalk project. The FERC also granted an additional 50 basis point adder for the advanced technology aspects of the 24-mile underground portion of the project and ordered us to file a compliance filing with details regarding the advanced technology. The 50 basis point adder will be limited to 46 basis points based on the present overall ROE limit established by the FERC, resulting in a total ROE for the underground portion of the Middletown-Norwalk project of 13.1 percent. The cost of the underground portion is estimated to be slightly less than half of CL&P's overall cost of approximately $1 billion. Once all advanced technology equipment is in service, the technology adder will increase our consolidated annual earnings beginning in 2009 by approximately $1 million.
On August 18, 2008, CL&P made a compliance filing with the FERC detailing the costs associated with the underground cables and supporting facilities of the Middletown-Norwalk project, which qualified as advanced technology. On that same day, several parties filed a request for rehearing on the total 146 basis point incentive that the FERC granted. In addition, on September 8, 2008, the DPUC filed a motion to reject and protest our compliance filing, stating we did not provide sufficient information. There is no specific deadline for the FERC to respond to this motion, but our response to the protest has been filed at the FERC.
62
NEEWS Incentives: On September 17, 2008, we and National Grid USA jointly submitted a filing with the FERC seeking financial incentives and rate amendments for the NEEWS projects. We have asked that the FERC rule on these requests within 60 days. The requested incentives include:
·
A ROE of 13.14 percent, representing an incentive of 150 basis points, which is aligned with recent FERC ROE decisions for other large transmission projects;
·
100 percent inclusion of prudently incurred CWIP in rate base; and
·
Full recovery of prudently incurred costs if NEEWS, or any portion thereof, is cancelled as a result of factors beyond NU's or National Grid's control.
Our share of NEEWS is estimated to cost $1.49 billion, and we are seeking incentives on transmission upgrades associated with approximately $1.41 billion of these costs. The FERC received third party comments objecting to our incentive filing and has until November 17, 2008 to rule on our filing.
Legislative Matters
Environmental Legislation: The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is a cooperative effort by ten northeastern and mid-Atlantic states, including Connecticut, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, to develop a regional program for stabilizing and reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants. RGGI proposes to stabilize CO 2 emissions at 2009 levels and reduce them by 10 percent from these levels by 2018. RGGI is composed of individual CO 2 budget trading programs in each of the participating states. Each participating states CO 2 budget trading program establishes its respective share of the regional cap, and each state will issue CO 2 allowances in a number equivalent to its portion of the regional cap. Each CO 2 allowance represents a permit to emit one ton of CO 2 in a specific year. The RGGI states will distribute CO 2 allowances primarily through regional auctions. Regulated power generators are able to purchase CO 2 allowances issued by any of the participating states to demonstrate compliance with the RGGI program of the state governing their generating plants. Taken together, the individual participating state programs will function as a single regional compliance market for carbon emissions.
Connecticut adopted regulations in July 2008 which established an auction clearing price threshold of $5 per CO 2 allowance, above which all auction proceeds will be rebated to customers. For proceeds up to the clearing price threshold, 69.5 percent will be directed to the conservation and load management programs managed by the states utilities in conjunction with the Energy Conservation Management Board. Seventy-five percent of the RGGI auction proceeds directed to conservation and load management programs will be allocated to CL&Ps programs. Because CL&P does not own any generating assets, it is not required to acquire CO 2 allowances.
Massachusetts law did not set an auction clearing price threshold for RGGI auctions. The law requires 80 percent of RGGI auction proceeds to be allocated to utility energy efficiency and demand response programs. Because WMECO does not own any generation assets, it is not required to acquire any CO 2 allowances either.
New Hampshire law sets an auction clearing price threshold of $6 per CO 2 allowance in 2009, above which all auction proceeds will be rebated to customers. Proceeds below the threshold are to be used for demand response and energy efficiency programs.
PSNH anticipates that its generating units will emit between 4 million and 5 million tons of CO 2 per year after taking into effect the operation of PSNHs Northern Woods wood-burning generating plant, which, under the RGGI formula, decreased PSNHs responsibility for reducing fossil-fired CO 2 emissions by approximately 425,000 tons per year, or almost ten percent . New Hampshire legislation provides up to 2.5 million banked CO 2 allowances per year for PSNHs fossil fueled generating plants during the 2009-2011 compliance period. These banked CO 2 allowances will comprise approximately one-half of the yearly CO 2 allowances required for PSNHs generating plants to comply with RGGI. PSNH expects to satisfy its remaining RGGI requirements from 2009 to 2011 by purchasing CO 2 allowances at auction or in the secondary market.
The first regional auction of RGGI CO 2 allowances took place on September 25, 2008. At the auction, CO 2 allowances were sold at the clearing price of $3.07 per CO 2 allowance. The next regional auction is scheduled for December 2008.
Massachusetts:
Corporate Excise Tax : On July 3, 2008, Massachusetts amended its corporate excise tax provisions, which are effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. Companies must account for the impact of income tax law changes in the period that includes the enactment date of the law change. As a result, WMECO recorded an estimate of the impact of the new legislation as a $4.7 million decrease to deferred tax liabilities and a decrease to regulatory assets on its condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008. The company will continue to monitor this legislation as Massachusetts provides further details.
63
Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters
Regulated Distribution Companies: We are currently evaluating the rate case strategies of our distribution companies. Based on each companys earnings, cost trends and sales trends in 2008, it is probable that PSNH will file a distribution rate case in mid-2009 seeking temporary rates effective July 2009, and it is possible that CL&P will file a distribution rate case in mid-2009 to be effective in January 2010. In response to the July 2008 rate decoupling decision in Massachusetts, WMECO notified the DPU that it intends to file a distribution rate case with full decoupling in mid-2010 to be effective in January 2011. We have no near-term plans to file a distribution rate case for Yankee Gas.
Connecticut:
Peaking Generation Contracts: As of October 2008, CL&P had entered into three CfDs with developers of peaking generation units approved by the DPUC. These units will have a total of 506 MW of peaking capacity. As directed by the DPUC, CL&P and UI have entered into a sharing agreement, whereby CL&P is responsible for 80 percent and UI for 20 percent of the net costs or benefits of these CfDs. CL&Ps portion of the costs and benefits will be paid by or refunded to CL&P customers.
FMCC Filing: In September 2008, the DPUC approved CL&Ps semi-annual federally mandated congestion charges (FMCC) filing, which reconciled the full year period January 1 through December 31, 2007, and which identified a total overrecovery of $105.4 million at December 31, 2007. This overrecovery is being fully returned to customers in 2008 through credits included in 2008 rates that were determined in separate rate proceedings. On August 5, 2008, CL&P filed with the DPUC its semi-annual reconciliation to document actual FMCC revenues and charges (including Energy Independence Act charges), and generation service charge (GSC) revenues and charges for the period January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008. This filing identified a net overrecovery totaling approximately $30.9 million including the remaining unamortized overrecovery from 2007. A draft decision is scheduled for November 14, 2008, and a final decision is scheduled for November 26, 2008.
Standard Service and Last Resort Service Rates: CL&P's residential and small commercial customers who do not choose competitive suppliers are served under Standard Service (SS) rates, and large commercial and industrial customers who do not choose competitive suppliers are served under Last Resort Service (LRS) rates. Effective July 1, 2008, the DPUC approved an increase to CL&P's total average SS and LRS rates of approximately 4.9 percent and 33.2 percent, respectively. The new LRS rate remained in effect until September 30, 2008, after which it declined by approximately 10 percent to a new rate that will remain in effect until December 31, 2008, while the new SS rate will remain in effect until December 31, 2008. The energy supply portion of the total average SS rate increased from 11.762 cents per KWH to 11.852 cents per KWH. The energy supply portion of the total average LRS rate increased from 10.466 cents per KWH to 14.559 cents per KWH then declined to 12.667 cents per KWH. CL&P is fully and timely recovering the costs of its SS and LRS services.
Customer Service Docket: On August 6, 2008, the DPUC issued a final decision in a docket investigating CL&P billing errors involving approximately 2,000 customers on time of use rates. The final decision found that CL&Ps actions and communications both internally and externally after it found that the bills were not being accurately calculated were imprudent. The decision requires CL&P to investigate and report what steps CL&P can take in the future to identify and respond quicker to billing system errors. The decision also disallowed recovery from customers of the incremental costs associated either directly or indirectly with the billing errors, which are not material and have been expensed as incurred. CL&P filed a compliance filing on September 30, 2008 outlining the costs associated with the billing errors as directed by the DPUC.
2008 Conservation and Load Management Plan: On September 24, 2008, the DPUC issued its final decision authorizing CL&P to spend an additional $10 million to fund Conservation and Load Management programs in 2008. The $10 million is to be taken from allowed funding for the 2009 Conservation and Load Management programs. The decision also found that CL&P did not act in a prudent manner in communicating the suspension of certain programs to the DPUC. As a result, the decision disallowed CL&P to earn a performance incentive on the $10 million authorized to restore the suspended programs and orders that any earned return on the $10 million be based on CL&P's short-term debt rate instead of its overall rate of return. We do not expect any material impact to our financial statements from this decision.
2008 Management Audit: On August 18, 2008, a consulting firm hired by the DPUC began an on-site management audit of CL&P, which is required to be conducted every six years by statute and requires a diagnostic review of all functions of the company. The audit will be ongoing through the remainder of 2008, and a draft report is expected to be provided to CL&P for comment in mid-January 2009. A final audit report is scheduled to be filed with the DPUC in late January 2009. We do not expect any impacts to our financial statements from results of this audit.
C2 Prudence Audit: Pursuant to the decision in CL&P's 2007 rate case, the DPUC has hired a consulting firm to perform a prudency audit of certain costs incurred in the implementation of a new customer service system (C2) at CL&P. The audit will begin in December 2008, with a final audit report to the DPUC due March 31, 2009. The DPUC has stated its intentions to open a new
64
proceeding to review the prudence of the C2 costs. At this time we do not know the scope of the audit or the proceeding. However, we do not expect a material impact to our financial statements as we believe all costs were prudently incurred.
New Hampshire:
Merrimack Clean Air Project : In 2006, the New Hampshire legislature enacted legislation requiring PSNH to reduce the mercury emissions from its coal-fired Merrimack Station in Bow, New Hampshire by at least 80 percent through the installation of wet scrubber technology no later than July 1, 2013. Following an August 2008 announcement by PSNH that the cost of this installation would be increasing from $250 million to $457 million, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) opened an inquiry to determine its authority to find whether the project is in the public interest before PSNH began construction. On September 19, 2008, the NHPUC ruled that it lacks authority in this matter, stating the New Hampshire legislature made a determination on the publics interest in 2006 when it required PSNH to install the scrubber technology. In its ruling, the NHPUC said that it retains jurisdiction over prudence of construction costs. In October 2008, several parties filed motions with the NHPUC requesting a reconsideration of its ruling. On October 27, 2008, the NHPUC suspended its September 19 decision pending further consideration of the issues raised in the motions. The NHPUC is expected to make a definitive decision regarding the rehearing motions in November 2008. PSNH expects to begin preliminary site work for this project in November 2008.
Major Storm Reserve: On June 27, 2008, the NHPUC issued an order in which the NHPUC accepted PSNH's proposal to increase its distribution rates by approximately $3 million for a two-year period effective July 1, 2008 to eliminate a negative balance in the major storm reserve and restore the intended reserve level of $1 million. As part of its review of the PSNH proposal, the NHPUC conducted an audit of major storm costs included in the reserve. On October 2, 2008, the NHPUC staff issued its final audit report, which had no impact on PSNHs earnings.
ES and SCRC Rates: On June 27, 2008, the NHPUC approved default energy service (ES) and stranded cost recovery charge (SCRC) rates of 9.57 cents and 0.65 cents per KWH, respectively, which are effective July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. On September 12, 2008, PSNH filed petitions with the NHPUC requesting increases in both its ES and SCRC rates on a preliminary basis for the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. Consistent with previous rate filings, PSNH is requesting that the NHPUC review and approve the underlying data in these filings, not a specific ES or SCRC rate. PSNH expects to petition the NHPUC in early December 2008 for specific 2009 ES and SCRC rates.
Massachusetts:
Basic Service Rates: Effective October 1, 2008, the rates for WMECO's medium and large commercial and industrial basic service customers decreased due to the decline in the cost of energy, which was reflected in its most recent basic service solicitations. Basic service rates for medium and large commercial and industrial customers decreased from 14.6 cents per KWH to 11.1 cents per KWH.
Service Quality Performance Assessment: As part of the December 2006 rate case settlement agreement approved by the DPU, WMECO became subject to service quality (SQ) metrics that measure safety, reliability and customer service. Any charges incurred are paid to customers through a method approved by the DPU. WMECO will likely be required to pay an assessment charge for its year-to-date reliability performance against the metrics established for 2008, primarily as a result of significant storm activity. WMECO has performed at target for other non-storm related reliability metrics. WMECO will file its 2008 SQ results and assessment calculation with the DPU in March 2009. In the third quarter of 2008, WMECO recorded an estimated pre-tax charge and a regulatory liability of approximately $1.4 million for this assessment. This amount is subject to adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2008 based on actual results.
Transfer of Transmission Assets: On November 5, 2008, our wholly owned subsidiaries, HWP, HP&E and WMECO, filed a joint application with the FERC requesting approval to transfer approximately $3.5 million in transmission related assets of HWP and HP&E to WMECO. We expect a decision by the FERC and closing of the transaction by the end of 2008.
Contingent Matters:
The items summarized below contain contingencies that may have an impact on our net income, financial position or cash flows. See Note 5A, "Commitments and Contingencies - Regulatory Developments and Rate Matters," to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding these matters.
·
CTA and SBC Reconciliation : On March 31, 2008, CL&P filed with the DPUC its 2007 Competitive Transition Assessment (CTA) and System Benefits Charge (SBC) reconciliation, which compared CTA and SBC revenues to revenue requirements. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, total CTA revenues exceeded CTA revenue requirements by $26.1 million, which has been recorded as a decrease to the CTA regulatory asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, the SBC cost of service exceeded SBC revenues by $39.4 million,
65
which has been recorded as a regulatory asset on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We expect a decision from the DPUC on this docket by the end of 2008 and do not expect the outcome to have a material adverse effect on CL&P's net income, financial position or cash flows.
·
Procurement Fee Rate Proceedings: CL&P submitted to the DPUC its proposed methodology to calculate the variable incentive portion of its procurement fee, which was effective through 2006, and requested approval of the pre-tax $5.8 million 2004 incentive fee. CL&P has not recorded amounts related to the 2005 or 2006 procurement fee in earnings, although CL&P would file for recognition of after-tax amounts of $3.3 million for 2006 and $3.6 million for 2005 if and when its methodology is approved.
CL&P has recovered the $5.8 million pre-tax amount, which was recorded in 2005 earnings through the CTA reconciliation process. If the DPUC does not allow recovery of $5.8 million for procurement fees in its final decision, then CL&P would record a loss and establish an obligation to refund this amount to its customers. A date for the new draft decision in this docket has not yet been determined by the DPUC. We believe that final regulatory approval of the $5.8 million pre-tax amount is probable.
·
ES and SCRC Reconciliation: On May 1, 2008, PSNH filed its 2007 ES/SCRC reconciliation with the NHPUC. During 2007, ES and SCRC revenues exceeded ES and SCRC costs by $1.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively, and were deferred as a regulatory liability to be refunded to customers. The NHPUC is currently reviewing this filing, which includes a prudence review of PSNH's generation operations. Testimony filed on October 24, 2008 by the NHPUC's consultant contained no material adverse findings. Hearings are scheduled before the NHPUC in November 2008. We do not expect the outcome of the NHPUC's review of this filing to have a material adverse impact on PSNH's net income, financial position or cash flows.
·
Transition Cost Reconciliation: On July 18, 2008, WMECO filed its 2007 transition cost (TC) reconciliation with the DPU, which compared TC revenue and revenue requirements. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, total TC revenues along with carrying charges exceeded TC revenue requirements by $2.6 million, which has been recorded as a regulatory liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. On September 19, 2008, the DPU issued an order of notice for this proceeding, scheduling a public hearing and procedural conference on November 20, 2008. We do not expect the outcome of the DPU's review of this filing to have a material adverse effect on WMECO's net income, financial position or cash flows.
NU Enterprises Divestitures
We have exited most of our competitive businesses. NU Enterprises continues to manage to completion its remaining wholesale marketing contracts and energy services activities.
Wholesale Marketing: During 2008 Select Energy continued to manage its remaining PJM power pool wholesale sales contract and its related supply contracts, which expired on May 31, 2008, and its long-term wholesale sales contract with the New York Municipal Power Agency (NYMPA), an agency comprised of municipalities, and related supply contracts, that expires in 2013. These contracts are derivatives that have been marked to market through earnings. In addition to the NYMPA-related contracts, Select Energy's only other long-term wholesale obligation is a non-derivative contract to purchase the output of a certain generating facility in New England through 2012. As a non-derivative contract, the fair value of the contract has not been reflected on the balance sheet, and the contract has not been marked to market. Based on the current estimated value of this non-derivative contract, when combined with the fair value of the derivative contracts in the NYMPA portfolio and cash collateral balances at September 30, 2008, we believe, under present conditions, that the estimated total net cash cost at September 30, 2008 to exit the remaining wholesale contracts if served out or settled at the same time is approximately break-even.
Energy Services: Most of NU Enterprises' energy services businesses were sold in 2005 and 2006. Certain other businesses were wound down in 2007; however, we continue to own and actively manage one energy services business, E.S. Boulos Company.
In connection with the sale of the retail marketing business, the competitive generation business and certain of the energy services businesses, we provided various guarantees and indemnifications to the purchasers of those businesses. See Note 5D, "Commitments and Contingencies - Guarantees and Indemnifications," to the condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding these items.
NU Enterprises Contracts
Wholesale Derivative Contracts: On January 1, 2008, we implemented SFAS No. 157. For further information on SFAS No. 157, see Note 1C, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements," and Note 3, "Fair Value Measurements," to the
66
condensed consolidated financial statements, and the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Update" section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair value of NU Enterprises' wholesale derivative assets and derivative liabilities (through its subsidiary Select Energy), which are subject to mark-to-market accounting, are as follows:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
||
Current wholesale derivative assets |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
$ |
36.2 |
Long-term wholesale derivative assets |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
7.2 |
Current wholesale derivative liabilities |
|
|
(18.5) |
|
|
(64.9) |
Long-term wholesale derivative liabilities |
|
|
(57.3) |
|
|
(72.5) |
Portfolio position |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
|
$ |
(94.0) |
Numerous factors could either positively or negatively affect the realization of the wholesale derivative net fair value amounts in cash. These factors include the volatility of commodity prices until the derivative contracts are exited or expire, differences between expected and actual volumes, the performance of counterparties, and other factors.
Select Energy has policies and procedures requiring all of its wholesale derivative energy positions to be valued daily and segregating responsibilities between the individuals actually transacting (front office) and those confirming the trades (middle office). The middle office is responsible for determining the portfolio's fair value independent from the front office.
The methods Select Energy used to determine the fair value of its wholesale derivative contracts are identified and segregated in the table of fair value of wholesale derivative contracts at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. A description of each method is as follows: 1) prices actively quoted primarily represent NYMEX futures and swaps that are marked to closing exchange prices; and 2) prices provided by external sources primarily include over-the-counter forwards and options, including bilateral contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity, and are marked to the mid-point of bid and ask market prices. The mid-points of market prices are adjusted to include all applicable market information, such as prior contract settlements with third parties and bilateral contract prices in illiquid periods. Currently, Select Energy also has a derivative contract for which a portion of the contract's fair value is determined based on a model. The model utilizes natural gas prices and a conversion factor to electricity for off-peak periods in 2012 and all periods for 2013. Broker quotes for electricity, at locations for which Select Energy has entered into transactions, are generally available through 2011 for on-peak and off-peak periods and through 2012 for on-peak periods.
Generally, valuations of short-term derivative contracts derived from quotes or other external sources are more reliable should there be a need to liquidate the contracts, while valuations for longer-term derivative contracts are less certain. Accordingly, there is a risk that derivative contracts will not be realized at the amounts recorded.
The tables below disaggregate the estimated fair value of the wholesale derivative contracts. Valuations of individual contracts are broken into their component parts based upon prices actively quoted, prices provided by external sources and model-based amounts. Under SFAS No. 157, contracts are classified in their entirety according to the lowest level for which there is at least one input that is significant to the valuation. Therefore, these contracts are classified as Level 3 under SFAS No. 157. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the sources of the fair value of wholesale derivative contracts are included in the following tables:
|
|
Fair Value of Wholesale Contracts at September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Maturity Less
|
|
Maturity of One
|
|
Maturity in
|
|
|
||||
Prices actively quoted |
|
$ |
(5.1) |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
(2.8) |
Prices provided by external sources |
|
|
(8.6) |
|
|
(31.6) |
|
|
(3.8) |
|
|
(44.0) |
Model-based (1) |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
(6.3) |
|
|
(14.8) |
|
|
(21.8) |
Totals |
|
$ |
(14.4) |
|
$ |
(35.9) |
|
$ |
(18.3) |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
|
|
Fair Value of Wholesale Contracts at December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Maturity Less
|
|
Maturity of One
|
|
Maturity in
|
|
|
||||
Prices actively quoted |
|
$ |
(4.7) |
|
$ |
(0.2) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
(3.5) |
Prices provided by external sources |
|
|
(24.0) |
|
|
(38.8) |
|
|
(13.4) |
|
|
(76.2) |
Model-based |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
(18.6) |
|
|
(14.3) |
Totals |
|
$ |
(28.7) |
|
$ |
(34.7) |
|
$ |
(30.6) |
|
$ |
(94.0) |
(1) The model-based amounts include the effects of implementing SFAS No. 157.
67
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the changes in fair value of these contracts are included in the following table:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Fair Value |
|
|
Total Portfolio Fair Value |
|
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of wholesale contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
(74.6) |
|
$ |
(94.0) |
Pre-tax effects of implementing SFAS No. 157 ($3.7 million after-tax) (1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(6.1) |
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
27.0 |
Period change in unrealized gains included in earnings |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
4.5 |
Fair value of wholesale contracts outstanding at the end of the period |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
|
$ |
(68.6) |
(1)
Pre-tax effect recorded in fuel, purchased and net interchange power on the condensed consolidated statement of income.
(2)
Amount includes purchases, issuances and settlements of $0.7 million and $21.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and realized intra-month losses of $0.7 million and gains of $5.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
For further information regarding Select Energy's derivative contracts, see Note 2, "Derivative Instruments," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Counterparty Credit Risk: Counterparty credit risk relates to the risk of loss that Select Energy would incur because of non-performance by counterparties pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. Select Energy has established credit policies with regard to its counterparties to minimize overall credit risk. These policies require an evaluation of potential counterparties' financial condition (including credit ratings), collateral requirements under certain circumstances (including cash advances, LOCs, and parent guarantees), and the use of standardized agreements that allow for the netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. This evaluation results in Select Energy establishing credit limits prior to entering into contracts. The appropriateness of these limits is subject to our continuing review. Concentrations among these counterparties may affect Select Energy's overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that the counterparties may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other conditions. At September 30, 2008, approximately 95 percent of Select Energy's counterparty credit exposure to wholesale counterparties was non-rated, approximately four percent was rated BBB- or better and approximately one percent was collateralized. The bulk of the non-rated credit exposure is comprised of one counterparty, which is a non-rated public entity that we have assessed as creditworthy. To date, this counterparty has met all of its contractual obligations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Update
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and at times difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Changes in these estimates, assumptions and judgments, in and of themselves, could materially impact our financial statements. Our management communicates to and discusses with our Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees all critical accounting policies and estimates. All of these critical accounting policies and estimates were reported in the 2007 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes with regard to these critical accounting policies and estimates, except as follows:
Accounting for Environmental Reserves: Environmental reserves are accrued when assessments indicate that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Adjustments made to environmental reserves could have a significant effect on earnings. Our approach estimates these liabilities based on the most likely action plan from a variety of available options, ranging from no action to establishing institutional controls, full site remediation and long-term monitoring. The estimates associated with each possible action plan are based on findings through various phases of site assessments.
These estimates are based on currently available information from presently enacted state and federal environmental laws and regulations and several cost estimates from third-party engineering and remediation contractors. These estimates also take into consideration prior experience in remediating contaminated sites and data released by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and other organizations. These estimates are subjective in nature partly because there are usually several different remediation options from which to choose when working on a specific site. These estimates are subject to revision in future periods based on actual costs or new information concerning either the level of contamination at the site or newly enacted laws and regulations. The amounts recorded as environmental liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets represent our best estimate of the liability for environmental costs based on current site information from site assessments and remediation estimates. These liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis.
68
Holyoke Water Power Company (HWP) is a subsidiary of NU that owns a minimal amount of transmission property and has limited operating activities. HWP continues to evaluate additional potential remediation requirements at a river site in Massachusetts containing tar deposits associated with a manufactured gas plant, which it sold to Holyoke Gas and Electric (HG&E), a municipal electric utility, in 1902. HWP is at least partially responsible for this site, and has already conducted substantial remediation activities. HWP first established a reserve for this site in 1994. A pre-tax charge of approximately $3 million was recorded in the first nine months of 2008 to reflect the estimated cost of further tar delineation and site characterization studies, as well as certain remediation costs that are considered to be probable and estimable as of September 30, 2008. The cumulative expense recorded to this reserve through September 30, 2008 was approximately $15.9 million, of which $13.3 million had been spent, leaving approximately $2.6 million in the reserve as of September 30, 2008.
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) issued a letter on April 3, 2008 to HWP and HG&E, who share responsibility for the site, providing conditional authorization for additional investigatory and risk characterization activities and providing detailed comments on HWPs 2007 reports and proposals for further investigations. MA DEP also indicated that further removal of tar in certain areas was necessary prior to commencing many of the additional studies and evaluation. This letter represents guidance from the MA DEP, rather than mandates. HWP has developed plans for additional investigations in conformity with MA DEPs guidance letter, including estimated costs and schedules. These matters are subject to ongoing discussions with MA DEP and HG&E and may change from time to time.
At this time, we believe that the $2.6 million remaining in the reserve is at the low end of a range of probable and estimable costs of approximately $2.6 million to $3.3 million and will be sufficient for HWP to conduct the additional tar delineation and site characterization studies, evaluate its approach to this matter and conduct certain soft tar remediation. The additional studies are expected to occur through 2009.
There are many outcomes that could affect our estimates and require an increase to the reserve or range of costs, and a reserve increase would be reflected as a charge to pre-tax earnings. However, we cannot reasonably estimate the range of additional investigation and remediation costs because they will depend on, among other things, the level and extent of the remaining tar that may be required to be remediated, the extent of HWPs responsibility and the related scope and timing, all of which are difficult to estimate because of a number of uncertainties at this time. Further developments may require a material increase to this reserve.
HWP's share of the remediation costs related to this site is not recoverable from customers.
Presentation: In accordance with GAAP, our consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries over which control is maintained and would include any variable interest entities (VIE) for which we are the primary beneficiary as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 46(R), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." Determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE is complex and subjective, and requires our judgment. There are a variety of facts and circumstances and a number of variables taken into consideration to determine whether we are considered the primary beneficiary of a VIE. A change in facts and circumstances or a change in accounting guidance could require us to reconsider whether or not we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
The Energy Independence Act required the DPUC to consider the impact on distribution companies of entering into long-term contracts for capacity and contracts to purchase renewable energy products from new generating plants. We reviewed each contract to determine the appropriate accounting treatment based on the terms of the contracts. In April 2007, CL&P entered into a 15-year agreement beginning in 2010 to purchase energy, capacity and renewable energy credits from a biomass energy plant yet to be built. In May 2008, CL&P and UI entered into six additional long-term agreements with proposed renewable energy plants. In July 2008, UI signed an additional contract. As directed by the DPUC, CL&P has an agreement with UI under which it will share the costs and benefits of these contracts with 80 percent to CL&P and 20 percent to UI. We evaluated whether entering into these contracts would require consolidation and determined that consolidation of the projects would not be required. The review of these contracts required significant management judgment.
In 2007, CL&P entered into two CfDs associated with the capacity of two generating projects to be built or modified, and UI entered into two capacity-related CfDs, one with a generating project to be built and one with a new demand response project. The contracts, referred to as Capacity CfDs, obligate the utilities to pay the difference between a set capacity price and the value that the projects receive in the ISO-NE capacity markets for periods of up to 15 years beginning in 2009. As directed by the DPUC, CL&P has an agreement with UI under which it will share the costs and benefits of these four Capacity CfDs with 80 percent to CL&P and 20 percent to UI. We determined that these contracts are derivatives and do not require consolidation.
The Energy Efficiency Act required electric distribution companies, including CL&P, and allowed others to file proposals with the DPUC to build cost-of-service peaking generation facilities. As of October 2008, CL&P has entered into three CfDs with developers of peaking generation units approved by the DPUC (Peaker CfDs). As directed by the DPUC, CL&P and UI have entered into a sharing agreement, whereby CL&P is responsible for 80 percent and UI for 20 percent of the net costs or benefits of these CfDs. The Peaker
69
CfDs pay the developer the difference between capacity, forward reserve and energy market revenues and a cost-of-service payment stream for 30 years. The ultimate cost or benefit to CL&P under these contracts will depend on the costs of plant construction and operation and the prices that the projects receive for capacity and other products in the ISO-NE markets. Amounts paid or received under the Peaker CfDs will be recoverable from or refunded to customers. CL&P signed contracts with two projects in the third quarter of 2008 and one project in October 2008. We evaluated whether these contracts are variable interests in VIEs that would require CL&P to consolidate the projects. CL&P has determined that none of these projects requires consolidation as of September 30, 2008. In future periods, one of the three projects may require consolidation if it becomes a VIE. Consolidation of that project would not impact CL&P's net income, but could add approximately $140 million of plant, $85 million of nonrecourse debt and $55 million of minority interest to CL&Ps balance sheet by the time the plant is placed in service (scheduled for June 2012). Any demonstrated increases in financing or other costs that might result from consolidation of the project would be recoverable from CL&P's customers.
The FASB is in the process of reinterpreting the consolidation requirements of FIN 46(R). If the proposed guidance were finalized in its current form, it would eliminate the requirement for consolidation when we do not have the power to direct matters that significantly impact the VIE's activities. CL&P would not be required to consolidate the peaker project if and when the new guidance becomes effective. The FASB reinterpretation of FIN 46(R), as drafted, would become effective on January 1, 2010. Changes in facts and circumstances and changes in accounting guidance resulting in reevaluation of the accounting treatment of these contracts could have a significant impact on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements: We adopted SFAS No. 157 as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). It establishes a framework for measuring fair value, using a three level hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs to the valuations. See Note 1C, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements," and Note 3, "Fair Value Measurements," to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.
As of January 1, 2008, we applied SFAS No. 157 to our regulated and unregulated companies derivative contracts that are recorded at fair value and to the marketable securities held in NUs Rabbi Trust and WMECOs prior spent nuclear fuel trust. SFAS No. 157 also applies to investment valuations for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans beginning as of December 31, 2008 and, beginning in 2009, to nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill and asset retirement obligations. Implementing SFAS No. 157 for our marketable securities expanded our financial statement disclosures, but did not affect the recorded fair value of investments.
In the first nine months of 2008, we recorded an after-tax reduction of earnings of $2.8 million as a result of applying SFAS No. 157 to derivative liabilities for Select Energys remaining wholesale marketing contracts, net of a $0.9 million benefit from partially reversing the implementation charge as we served rather than exited these contracts during the period.
As a result of implementing SFAS No. 157, we also recorded changes in fair value of certain derivative contracts of CL&P. Because CL&P is a cost-of-service, rate regulated entity, the cost or benefit of the contracts is expected to be fully recovered from or refunded to CL&P's customers, and an offsetting regulatory asset or liability was recorded to reflect these changes. Implementing SFAS No. 157 resulted in a total increase to CL&P's derivative liabilities, with an offset to regulatory assets, of approximately $590 million and a total decrease to derivative assets, with an offset to regulatory liabilities, of approximately $30 million. The increase to CL&P's derivative liabilities primarily resulted from an increase in the negative fair value of a CfD with a generating plant to be built to reflect the estimated cost to exit this contract, reflecting an increase in the probability that the plant will be built and the recognition of a loss at the inception of the contract of approximately $100 million that was deferred under previous accounting guidance.
If we do not exit but rather serve out our derivative liability contracts, we will not make payments for some portion of the negative fair value recorded for the contracts. Likewise, we could receive more cash for derivative assets than the fair value recorded.
We use quoted market prices when available to determine fair values of financial instruments and classify those valuations as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.
If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable. These valuations are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Many of our derivative contracts that are recorded at fair value are classified as Level 3 within the hierarchy and are valued using models that incorporate both observable and unobservable inputs. Fair value is modeled using techniques such as discounted cash flow approaches adjusted for assumptions relating to exit price and the Black-Scholes option pricing model, incorporating the terms of the contracts. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the valuations include energy and energy-related product prices for future years for long-dated derivative contracts, future contract quantities under full requirements and supplemental sales contracts, and market volatilities. Discounted cash flow valuations incorporate estimates of premiums or discounts that would be required by a market
70
participant to arrive at an exit price, using available historical market transaction information. Valuations of derivative contracts also reflect nonperformance risk, including credit risk. Contracts valued using models are classified according to the lowest level for which there is at least one input that is significant to the valuation. Therefore, an item may be classified as Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.
Changes in fair value of the remaining wholesale marketing contracts of our unregulated businesses are recorded in fuel, purchased and net interchange power on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were net unrealized gains of $3.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to the valuation of these contracts. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were net realized losses of $0.4 million and gains of $3.4 million, respectively, related to the valuation of these contracts. Key drivers of variability in fair values include changes in energy prices and expected volumes under the contracts.
Changes in fair value of the regulated company derivative contracts are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities, as we expect to recover these costs in rates. These valuations are sensitive to the prices of energy and energy related products in future years for which markets have not yet developed. Assumptions made to implement SFAS No. 157 had a significant effect on derivative values, and changes in assumptions may continue to have significant effects.
Total Level 3 derivative assets were 72 percent of our total assets measured at fair value, and Level 3 derivative liabilities were 94 percent of our total liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2008. A significant portion of our Level 3 derivative liabilities relate to the regulated company derivative contracts for which changes in fair value do not affect our earnings due to our use of regulatory accounting. Changes in fair value of these contracts are not material to our liquidity or capital resources because the costs and benefits of the contracts are recoverable from or refundable to customers on a timely basis.
Our regulated and unregulated business activities, that result in the recognition of derivative assets, create exposures to credit risk of energy marketing and trading counterparties. At September 30, 2008, we had $100.6 million of derivative assets exposed to counterparty credit risk that are contracted with multiple investment grade entities, $10.5 million with a government-backed entity, and $199.3 million related to a non-rated subsidiary of an investment grade company. We consider the credit ratings of these companies in our valuation of derivative assets and we use published probability of default indices based on the credit ratings of the counterparties to discount the value of the derivative asset. Changes in our counterparties credit impact our ability to collect the derivative asset. Our derivative assets are primarily related to our regulated companies. Credit losses on regulated company contracts would not affect our earnings because these entities are cost-of-service regulated companies and costs of these contracts are recoverable from our customers. In addition, we consider our own credit rating in the valuation of derivative liabilities. The fair values of our derivative assets and liabilities were not impacted by changes in credit risk in the third quarter of 2008.
We review and update our fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. As of September 30, 2008, investment securities are classified in Levels 1 and 2. Classification of an investment security or group of investment securities into Level 3 may occur if a significant amount of inputs to their valuation is no longer observable due to a decline in market activity or liquidity. We have assessed the impact of recently increasing market illiquidity on the valuation of our investments. Observable inputs remain available to value the classes of securities we own. We continue to monitor the liquidity of our securities and review our valuations to ensure proper classification within the fair value hierarchy.
Current market conditions are the key drivers of unrealized losses incurred on our investment securities. We consider unrealized losses to be other than temporary by nature because investment decisions are made by our trustee and thus we do not have the ability to hold securities until unrealized losses are recovered. Therefore, unrealized losses are recorded as realized losses in our condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of after-tax unrealized losses incurred on our Rabbi Trust in other income, net on the condensed consolidated statements of income. These amounts were partially offset by $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of after-tax net realized gains on sales of investment securities. Losses related to the WMECO spent nuclear fuel trust are recorded as an increase to the spent nuclear fuel obligation and do not impact earnings.
For further information on derivative contracts, see Note 1C, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fair Value Measurements," and Note 2, "Derivative Instruments," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill Impairment: NU conducts goodwill impairment testing as of October 1 of each year. NU's remaining goodwill balance totaling $287.6 million relates to the acquisition of Yankee Gas in 2000. The testing of goodwill for impairment requires management to use estimates and judgment. Key factors that are considered in the impairment analysis include cash flow projections, interest rates, and recent comparable acquisition values. The company is in the process of completing the annual impairment test of the Yankee Gas goodwill as of October 1, 2008.
71
If, as a result of the impairment analysis, the estimated fair value of Yankee Gas is lower than its carrying value, then a second step of goodwill impairment testing would be required. The estimated fair value of Yankee Gas initially determined would be allocated to the assets and liabilities of Yankee Gas to determine the new value of goodwill. This new value would be compared to the carrying value of Yankee Gas goodwill, and any excess carrying value would be written off.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is estimated annually for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating current and deferred income tax expense or benefit as impacted by earnings and the impact of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as timing of the deduction and expenses, for tax and book accounting purposes, as well as, any impact of permanent differences resulting from tax credits, flow-through items, non-tax deductible expenses, etc. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The income tax estimation process impacts all of our segments. In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting," we record income tax expense quarterly using an estimated annualized effective tax rate. Adjustments to these estimates can significantly affect our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Part of the annual process in making adjustments to these estimates, as needed, is a reconciliation of the actual tax positions and amounts included on our income tax returns as filed in the fall of each year for the previous tax year to the estimates or provisions made during the income tax estimation process described above.
In the third quarter of 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, the impact of these return to provision adjustments on income tax expense were as follows (in millions):
(Benefit)/Expense: |
|
2008 |
|
2007* |
||
CL&P |
|
$ |
(1.0) |
|
$ |
3.3 |
PSNH |
|
|
(1.3) |
|
|
(0.4) |
WMECO |
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
(0.9) |
Competitive businesses |
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
(0.3) |
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
1.1 |
Total |
|
$ |
(3.2) |
|
$ |
2.8 |
*Represents the impacts of the return to provision for the year 2007 as recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Other Matters
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments: For updated information regarding our contractual obligations and commercial commitments at September 30, 2008, see Note 5B, "Commitments and Contingencies - Long-Term Contractual Arrangements," to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Forward Looking Statements: This discussion and analysis includes statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, assumptions of future events, financial performance or growth and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are "forward looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can generally identify these "forward looking statements" through the use of words or phrases such as "estimate," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "project," "believe," "forecast," "should," "could," and similar expressions. Forward looking statements are based on the current expectations, estimates, assumptions or projections of management and are not guarantees of future performance. These expectations, estimates, assumptions or projections may vary materially from actual results. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward looking statements, including, but not limited to, actions by state and federal regulatory bodies, competition and industry restructuring, changes in economic conditions, changes in weather patterns, changes in laws, regulations or regulatory policy, changes in levels and timing of capital expenditures, developments in legal or public policy doctrines, technological developments, changes in accounting standards and financial reporting regulations, fluctuations in the value of our remaining competitive electricity positions, actions of rating agencies, and other presently unknown or unforeseen factors. Other risk factors are detailed from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC and we encourage you to consult such disclosures.
All such factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect our actual results and are beyond our control. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. For more information, see "Risk Factors" included in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also describes material
72
contingencies and critical accounting policies and estimates in the accompanying "Managements Discussion and Analysis" and "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements." We encourage you to review these items.
Web Site: Additional financial information is available through our web site at www.nu.com.
73
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - NU CONSOLIDATED
The following table provides the variances in income statement line items for the condensed consolidated statements of income for NU included in this report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
Income Statement Variances
|
|
||||||||
|
Third
|
|
Percent |
|
Nine
|
|
Percent |
|
||
Operating Revenues |
$ |
56 |
|
4 |
% |
$ |
(194) |
|
(4) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power |
|
(80) |
|
(9) |
|
|
(470) |
|
(17) |
|
Other operation |
|
37 |
|
19 |
|
|
77 |
|
11 |
|
Maintenance |
|
17 |
|
32 |
|
|
39 |
|
25 |
|
Depreciation |
|
5 |
|
8 |
|
|
15 |
|
8 |
|
Amortization of regulatory assets, net |
|
44 |
|
(a) |
|
|
112 |
|
(a) |
|
Amortization of rate reduction bonds |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
6 |
|
9 |
|
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
30 |
|
2 |
|
|
(217) |
|
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
26 |
|
21 |
|
|
23 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
9 |
|
15 |
|
|
19 |
|
11 |
|
Other income, net |
|
7 |
|
65 |
|
|
5 |
|
13 |
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
24 |
|
33 |
|
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
|
(7) |
|
(9) |
|
Preferred dividends of subsidiary |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
23 |
|
45 |
|
|
16 |
|
9 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
(1) |
|
(100) |
|
Net Income |
$ |
23 |
|
45 |
% |
$ |
15 |
|
9 |
% |
(a) Percent greater than 100.
Net income was $23 million higher in the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to the growth in the company's transmission segment and was $15 million higher for the nine months primarily due to the growth in the companys transmission segment, partially offset by a $29.8 million after-tax charge associated with the settlement of litigation with Con Edison.
Comparison of the Third Quarter of 2008 to the Third Quarter of 2007
Operating Revenues
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Variance |
|||
Electric distribution |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
$ |
41 |
Gas distribution |
|
|
92 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
20 |
Total distribution |
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
61 |
Transmission |
|
|
108 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
39 |
Regulated companies |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
100 |
Competitive businesses |
|
|
23 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
(44) |
NU consolidated |
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
$ |
56 |
Operating revenues increased $56 million in 2008 primarily due to higher revenues from the regulated companies ($100 million), partially offset by lower revenues from competitive businesses ($44 million). The higher regulated company revenues were primarily due to the recovery of a higher level of CL&P and PSNH distribution related expenses passed through to customers through regulatory tracking mechanisms. Competitive business revenues decreased $44 million due to the continued exit from components of the competitive businesses.
Revenues from the regulated companies increased $100 million due to higher distribution segment revenues ($61 million) and higher transmission segment revenues ($39 million). Distribution segment revenues increased $61 million primarily due to higher electric
74
distribution revenues ($41 million) and higher gas distribution revenues ($20 million). Transmission segment revenues increased $39 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Electric distribution revenues increased $41 million primarily due to the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($27 million) and the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($14 million). The portion of electric distribution segment revenues that flows through to earnings increased $14 million primarily due to increases in retail rates at each of the regulated companies ($18 million), partially offset by lower retail electric sales ($3 million). Retail electric sales decreased 2.9 percent in 2008 compared with 2007. Gas distribution revenues increased $20 million primarily due to increased recovery of gas costs and higher sales volumes. Firm gas sales increased 13 percent in 2008 compared with 2007.
The $27 million electric distribution revenue increase that does not impact earnings is due to the components of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO retail revenues that are included in regulatory commission approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($62 million), partially offset by revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($35 million). The distribution revenue tracking components increased $62 million primarily due to higher CL&P retail transmission revenues ($40 million) mainly as a result of the higher 2008 rates and higher CL&P wholesale revenues primarily due to an increase in the market price of energy relating to sales of independent power producers (IPP) generation to ISO-NE ($21 million) that benefits customers. The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expenses decreased $80 million in 2008 due to lower costs at the regulated companies ($38 million) and lower expenses at the competitive businesses ($42 million). Fuel expense from the regulated companies decreased primarily due to lower CL&P and WMECO standard offer supply costs as a result of a reduction in load caused by customer migration to third party suppliers and lower retail sales ($74 million), partially offset by higher Yankee Gas ($18 million) and PSNH fuel expense ($18 million). Competitive business fuel expenses decreased due to the continued exit from certain components of the competitive businesses.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses increased $37 million in 2008 primarily due to higher regulated companies distribution and transmission segment expenses ($44 million), partially offset by lower competitive business expenses ($6 million) and lower NU parent and other companies expenses ($1 million).
Higher regulated companies distribution and transmission segment expenses of $44 million are primarily due to higher distribution costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($72 million), partially offset by expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($35 million). Competitive business expenses are lower by $6 million primarily due to lower operating costs at the remaining services businesses.
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $17 million in 2008 primarily due to higher regulated companies distribution expenses ($9 million) and PSNH generation segment expenses mainly as a result of the Merrimack Station maintenance outages ($9 million), partially offset by lower transmission line expenses ($1 million). Regulated company distribution expenses are $9 million higher mainly as a result of higher overhead line maintenance expenses primarily due to more storm-related expenses ($7 million) and tree trimming ($2 million).
Depreciation
Depreciation increased $5 million in 2008 primarily due to higher transmission and distribution depreciation expense as a result of higher plant balances from completed construction programs put into service.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of regulatory assets, net increased $44 million in 2008 for the distribution segment primarily due to higher amortization at CL&P ($49 million) resulting from a higher recovery of transition costs ($31 million), higher amortization of SBC ($12 million) and a credit in 2007 pertaining to the refund of the GSC overrecovery ($7 million).
75
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds increased $1 million in 2008. The higher portion of principal within rate reduction bond payments resulted in a corresponding increase in the amortization of rate reduction bonds. This increase was partially offset by a decrease at PSNH resulting from the retirement of $50 million of rate reduction bonds in January 2008.
Taxes Other than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $6 million in 2008 primarily due to higher Connecticut gross earnings tax ($7 million) as a result of higher distribution revenues that are subject to gross earnings tax.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $9 million in 2008 primarily due to higher long-term debt interest ($11 million) resulting from the issuance of new long-term debt in 2007 and 2008, partially offset by lower rate reduction bond interest resulting from lower principal balances outstanding ($3 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $7 million in 2008 primarily due to interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement ($10 million) and higher AFUDC equity income ($4 million), partially offset by higher investment losses ($4 million) and lower investment income ($2 million).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased $1 million due primarily to tax settlement related interest income and other CL&P pre-tax earnings increases, partially offset by flow through impacts associated with depreciation and bad debt reserve changes. NU's current projected effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate due primarily to temporary flow through depreciation benefits, Medicare subsidy and tax credits.
Comparison of the First Nine Months of 2008 to the First Nine Months of 2007
Operating Revenues
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Variance |
|||
Electric distribution |
|
$ |
3,579 |
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
$ |
(202) |
Gas distribution |
|
|
405 |
|
|
352 |
|
|
53 |
Total distribution |
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
(149) |
Transmission |
|
|
281 |
|
|
202 |
|
|
79 |
Regulated companies |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
4,335 |
|
|
(70) |
Competitive businesses |
|
|
87 |
|
|
211 |
|
|
(124) |
NU consolidated |
|
$ |
4,352 |
|
$ |
4,546 |
|
$ |
(194) |
Operating revenues decreased $194 million in 2008 primarily due to lower revenues from competitive businesses ($124 million) and lower revenues from the regulated companies ($70 million). Competitive business revenues decreased $124 million due to the continued exit from components of the competitive businesses. The lower regulated companies revenues were primarily due to the recovery of a lower level of CL&P distribution related expenses passed through to customers through regulatory tracking mechanisms.
Revenues from the regulated companies decreased $70 million due to lower distribution segment revenues ($149 million), partially offset by higher transmission segment revenues ($79 million). Distribution segment revenues decreased $149 million primarily due to lower electric distribution revenues ($202 million), partially offset by higher gas distribution revenues ($53 million). Transmission segment revenues increased $79 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Electric distribution revenues decreased $202 million primarily due to the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($260 million), partially offset by the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($58 million). The portion of the electric distribution segment that flows through to earnings increased $58 million primarily due to increases in retail rates at each of regulated companies ($72 million), partially offset by lower retail electric sales ($10 million). Retail electric sales decreased 3 percent in 2008 compared with 2007. Gas distribution revenues increased $53 million primarily due to increased recovery of gas costs and the rate increase effective July 1, 2007. Firm gas sales were unchanged in 2008 as compared with 2007.
The $260 million electric distribution revenue decrease that does not impact earnings is due to the components of CL&P, PSNH and WMECO retail revenues that are included in regulatory commission approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($184 million) and revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($76 million). The distribution revenue tracking
76
components decreased $184 million primarily due to revenues associated with the recovery of generation service and related congestion charges ($220 million) and CL&P delivery-related FMCC ($68 million), partially offset by higher CL&P wholesale revenues primarily due to an increase in the market price of energy related to sales of IPP generation to ISO-NE ($69 million) and higher CL&P and PSNH retail transmission revenues ($46 million) mainly as a result of the higher 2008 rates. The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expenses decreased $470 million in 2008 due to lower costs at the regulated companies ($334 million) and lower expenses at NU Enterprises ($136 million). Fuel expense from the regulated companies decreased primarily due to lower CL&P and WMECO standard offer supply costs as a result of a reduction in load caused by customer migration to third party suppliers and lower retail sales ($402 million), partially offset by higher Yankee Gas ($35 million) and PSNH fuel expense ($33 million). Competitive business fuel expenses decreased due to the continued exit from certain components of the competitive businesses.
Other Operation
Other operation increased $77 million in 2008 primarily due to higher NU parent and other companies expenses ($47 million), higher regulated companies distribution and transmission segment expenses ($17 million) and higher competitive business expenses ($13 million).
NU parent and other companies' expenses are higher by $47 million in 2008 primarily due to the $49.5 million payment to Con Edison resulting from the settlement of litigation. Competitive business expenses are higher by $13 million primarily due to higher operating costs at the remaining services businesses.
Higher regulated company distribution and transmission segment expenses of $17 million are primarily due to higher costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($88 million) and higher distribution segment expenses, partially offset by expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($78 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $39 million in 2008 primarily due to higher regulated company distribution expenses ($28 million), higher generation segment expenses mainly related to the Merrimack Station maintenance outages ($10 million) and higher transmission line expenses ($1 million). Regulated company distribution expenses are $28 million higher mainly as a result of higher overhead line maintenance expenses due to more storm-related expenses ($13 million), tree trimming ($7 million), substation equipment ($3 million), line transformers ($2 million), and underground line activities ($1 million).
Depreciation
Depreciation increased $15 million in 2008 primarily due to higher transmission and distribution depreciation expense as a result of higher plant balances from completed construction programs put into service.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of regulatory assets, net increased $112 million in 2008 for the distribution segment primarily due to higher amortization at CL&P ($116 million) resulting from a higher recovery of transition costs ($69 million), higher amortization of SBC ($27 million) and a credit in 2007 pertaining to the refund of the GSC provision for rate refunds ($22 million).
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds increased $3 million in 2008. The higher portion of principal within the rate reduction bond payments results in a corresponding increase in the amortization of rate reduction bonds. This increase was partially offset by a decrease at PSNH resulting from the retirement of $50 million of rate reduction bonds in January 2008.
Taxes Other than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $7 million in 2008 primarily due to higher Connecticut gross earnings tax ($9 million) mainly as a result of higher distribution revenues that are subject to gross earnings tax and higher property taxes at CL&P and PSNH ($3 million) as a result of higher plant balances, partially offset by lower payroll taxes ($3 million).
77
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $19 million in 2008 primarily due to higher long-term debt interest ($24 million) resulting from the issuance of new long-term debt in 2007 and the first half of 2008 and higher other interest ($3 million) mostly related to short-term debt, partially offset by lower rate reduction bond interest resulting from lower principal balances outstanding ($8 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $5 million in 2008 primarily due to higher AFUDC equity income ($12 million), interest income related to the 2008 tax settlement ($10 million), and higher Energy Independence Act (EIA) incentives ($4 million), partially offset by the absence of the higher interest earned in 2007 on cash the parent received from the November 2006 sale of NU's competitive generation ($13 million) and higher investment losses ($7 million).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased $7 million; $28 million from NU Parent and other including $20 million from the settlement of litigation with Con Edison and $8 million from other pre-tax expense increases, partially offset by pre-tax earnings related tax expense increases at CL&P ($20 million) and PSNH ($1 million). NU's current projected effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate due primarily to temporary flow through depreciation benefits, Medicare subsidy and tax credits.
Income from Discontinued Operations
See Note 7, "Discontinued Operations," to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a description and explanation of the discontinued operations.
78
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CL&P is a wholly owned subsidiary of NU. This discussion should be read in conjunction with NU's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes in this Form 10-Q, the First and Second Quarter 2008 Form 10-Q and the NU 2007 Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table provides the variances in income statement line items for the condensed consolidated statements of income for CL&P included in this report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
Income Statement Variances
|
|
||||||||
|
Third
|
|
Percent |
|
Nine
|
|
Percent |
|
||
Operating Revenues |
$ |
62 |
|
7 |
% |
$ |
(145) |
|
(5) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power |
|
(82) |
|
(14) |
|
|
(396) |
|
(22) |
|
Other operation |
|
53 |
|
60 |
|
|
37 |
|
10 |
|
Maintenance |
|
6 |
|
22 |
|
|
18 |
|
22 |
|
Depreciation |
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
Amortization of regulatory assets, net |
|
49 |
|
(a) |
|
|
116 |
|
(a) |
|
Amortization of rate reduction bonds |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
5 |
|
11 |
|
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
35 |
|
4 |
|
|
(208) |
|
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
27 |
|
37 |
|
|
63 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
Other income, net |
|
6 |
|
73 |
|
|
15 |
|
71 |
|
Income before income tax |
|
30 |
|
68 |
|
|
72 |
|
55 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
9 |
|
(a) |
|
|
20 |
|
56 |
|
Net Income |
$ |
21 |
|
59 |
% |
$ |
52 |
|
54 |
% |
(a) Percent greater than 100.
Comparison of the Third Quarter of 2008 to the Third Quarter of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues increased $62 million in 2008 due to higher transmission segment revenues ($33 million) and higher distribution segment revenues ($29 million). Transmission segment revenues increased $33 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
The distribution segment revenues increased $29 million due to the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($16 million) and the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($13 million). The portion that flows through to earnings increased $16 million primarily due to the rate increase effective February 1, 2008 ($17 million), partially offset by lower retail sales ($1 million). Retail sales decreased 2.7 percent in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
The $13 million distribution revenue increase that does not impact earnings is due to the components of retail revenues that are included in DPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($38 million), partially offset by revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($25 million). The distribution revenue DPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs increased $38 million primarily due to higher retail transmission revenues ($40 million) mainly as a result of the higher 2008 rates, higher wholesale revenues primarily due to an increase in the market price of energy relating to sales of IPP generation to ISO-NE ($21 million) that benefits customers and higher SBC revenues ($10 million), partially offset by a decrease in revenues associated with the recovery of GSC and related FMCC charges ($36 million). The lower GSC and FMCC
79
revenue was primarily due to a reduction in load caused primarily by customer migration to third party suppliers, lower congestion costs and lower sales in 2008. The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expense decreased $82 million primarily due to a decrease in GSC supply costs ($42 million), a decrease in deferred fuel costs ($29 million) and lower other purchased power costs ($11 million), all of which are included in DPUC approved tracking mechanisms. The $42 million decrease in GSC supply costs was primarily due to a reduction in load caused primarily by customer migration to third party suppliers and lower retail sales. These GSC supply costs are the contractual amounts CL&P must pay to various suppliers that have earned the right to supply SS and LRS load through a competitive solicitation process. The $29 million decrease in deferred fuel costs was primarily due to the combined effect of CL&P having a supply and delivery-related net FMCC overrecovery in the third quarter of 2007 and a supply and delivery-related net FMCC underrecovery in the third quarter of 2008.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses increased $53 million primarily due to higher costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($77 million) such as retail transmission ($37 million), reliability must run (RMR) ($30 million) and conservation and load management (C&LM) expenses ($6 million), and higher transmission segment expenses ($3 million), partially offset by expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($25 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $6 million in 2008 primarily due to higher distribution overhead lines ($6 million), primarily due to more storms in the third quarter of 2008 compared to 2007.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased $2 million primarily due to higher utility plant balances resulting from completed construction programs put into service.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of regulatory assets, net increased $49 million primarily due to a higher recovery of transition costs ($31 million), a higher recovery of SBC ($12 million) and a credit in 2007 pertaining to the refund of the GSC overrecovery ($7 million).
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds increased $2 million. The higher portion of principal within the rate reduction bonds payment results in a corresponding increase in the amortization of regulatory assets.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $5 million primarily due to higher gross earnings taxes as a result of higher distribution revenues that are subject to gross earnings tax.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $3 million primarily due to higher long-tem debt interest ($7 million) resulting from the $200 million debt issuance in September 2007 and the $300 million debt issuance in May 2008, partially offset by lower rate reduction bond interest resulting from lower principal balances outstanding ($2 million) and lower short-term debt interest expense ($1 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $6 million in 2008 primarily due to higher interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement ($6 million) and higher AFUDC equity income ($2 million) as a result of higher eligible CWIP due to the transmission construction program and lower short-term debt resulting in an increase in CWIP financed by equity, partially offset by higher investment losses ($3 million).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased $9 million primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings being subject to tax at marginal rates, partially offset by flow through impacts associated with depreciation and bad debt reserve changes thereby reducing the effective tax rate.
80
Comparison of the First Nine Months of 2008 to the First Nine Months of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased $145 million in 2008 due to lower distribution segment revenues ($223 million), partially offset by higher transmission segment revenues ($78 million).
The distribution segment revenues decreased $223 primarily due to the component of revenues that does not impact earnings ($270 million), partially offset by the component of revenues that flows through to earnings, which increased $48 million.
The $270 million distribution segment revenue decrease that does not impact earnings is due to the components of retail revenues that are included in DPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($212 million) and revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($59 million). The distribution revenue DPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs decreased $212 million primarily due to a decrease in revenues associated with the recovery of GSC and related FMCC ($278 million) and delivery-related FMCC ($68 million), partially offset by higher wholesale revenues primarily due to an increase in the market price of energy related to sales of IPP generation to ISO-NE ($69 million), higher retail transmission revenues ($32 million) mainly as a result of higher 2008 rates and higher SBC revenues ($27 million). The lower GSC and related FMCC revenue was primarily due to a reduction in load caused primarily by customer migration to third party suppliers, lower congestion costs and lower sales in 2008. The lower delivery-related FMCC revenue was primarily due to a decrease in this rate component in 2008 as a result of lower RMR, VAR support and southwest Connecticut energy resource costs in 2008, as well as a larger prior year overrecovery being refunded to customers in 2008 as compared to 2007. The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
The portion of the distribution segment that flows through to earnings increased $48 million primarily due to the rate increase effective February 1, 2008 ($57 million), partially offset by lower retail sales ($7 million). Retail sales decreased 3.6 percent in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Transmission segment revenues increased $78 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expense decreased $396 million primarily due to a decrease in GSC supply costs ($237 million), a decrease in deferred fuel costs ($138 million) and lower other purchased power costs ($20 million), all of which are included in DPUC approved tracking mechanisms. The $237 million decrease in GSC supply costs was primarily due to a reduction in load caused primarily by customer migration to third party suppliers and lower retail sales. These GSC supply costs are the contractual amounts CL&P must pay to various suppliers that have earned the right to supply SS and LRS load through a competitive solicitation process. The $138 million decrease in deferred fuel costs was primarily due to the combined effect of CL&P having a supply and delivery-related net FMCC overrecovery in the first nine months of 2007 and a supply and delivery-related net FMCC underrecovery in the first nine months of 2008.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses increased $37 million primarily due to higher costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($93 million) such as retail transmission ($29 million), RMR ($25 million), higher EIA expenses ($12 million), higher tracked administrative and general expenses ($8 million), higher uncollectibles ($8 million), higher C&LM expenses ($4 million), and higher transmission segment expenses ($5 million), partially offset by expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($60 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $18 million in 2008 primarily due to higher distribution overhead line ($8 million), primarily due to more storms in 2008 compared to 2007, higher tree trimming expenses ($5 million), higher distribution substation equipment ($2 million), and higher line transformer activities ($2 million).
Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased $5 million primarily due to higher utility plant balances resulting from completed construction programs put into service.
81
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of regulatory assets, net increased $116 million primarily due to a higher recovery of transition costs ($69 million), a credit in 2007 pertaining to the refund of the GSC overrecovery ($22 million) and higher recovery of SBC ($27 million).
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds increased $7 million. The higher portion of principal within the rate reduction bonds payment results in a corresponding increase in the amortization of regulatory assets.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $5 million primarily due to higher gross earnings taxes as a result of higher distribution revenues that are subject to gross earnings tax.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $6 million primarily due to higher long-term debt interest ($16 million) resulting from the $200 million debt issuance in September 2007, the $300 million debt issuance in March 2007 and the $300 million debt issuance in May 2008, partially offset by lower rate reduction bond interest resulting from lower principal balances outstanding ($6 million) and lower short-term debt interest expense ($3 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $15 million in 2008 primarily due to higher AFUDC equity income ($10 million) as a result of higher eligible CWIP due to the transmission construction program and lower short-term debt resulting in an increase in CWIP financed by equity, higher interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement ($6 million) and higher EIA incentives ($4 million), partially offset by higher investment losses ($5 million).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased $20 million primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings being subject to tax at marginal rates, partially offset by flow through impacts associated with depreciation and bad debt reserve changes thereby reducing the effective tax rate.
LIQUIDITY
CL&P had positive consolidated operating cash flows of $202.2 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with negative operating cash flows of $12.6 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2007. Operating cash flows in 2007 include tax payments of approximately $177.2 million related to the 2006 sale of NU's competitive generation business. Other drivers resulting in increased operating cash flows from 2007 were higher operating results after adjustments for reconciling items to net income, which included a year-to-date reduction in regulatory refunds and underrecoveries (net of income tax impacts). Regulatory refunds and underrecoveries decreased by $33 million from the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a $28 million deferral adjustment in the third quarter of 2008 for differences in transmission costs related to the Schedule 21 rates.
CL&P projects consolidated operating cash flows of approximately $300 million to $350 million in 2008, after approximately $170 million of rate reduction bond payments. This projection includes an expected income tax net settlement of approximately $40 million in the fourth quarter.
Cash capital expenditures included on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows do not include amounts incurred on capital projects but not yet paid, cost of removal, the AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income. CL&Ps cash capital expenditures totaled $678.6 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $550.1 million in the first nine months of 2007. This increase was primarily the result of higher transmission capital expenditures in 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, CL&P had borrowings of $188 million under the $400 million credit facility it shares with other NU subsidiaries. Other financing activities for the first nine months of 2008 included a $300 million issuance of 10-year bonds and capital contributions from NU parent of $137.4 million, offset by $79.8 million in common dividends paid to NU parent during the first nine months of 2008.
82
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
PSNH is a wholly owned subsidiary of NU. This discussion should be read in conjunction with NUs Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes in this Form 10-Q, the First and Second Quarter 2008 Form 10-Q and the NU 2007 Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table provides the variances in income statement line items for the condensed consolidated statements of income for PSNH included in this report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
Income Statement Variances
|
|
||||||||
|
Third
|
|
Percent |
|
Nine
|
|
Percent |
|
||
Operating Revenues |
$ |
17 |
|
6 |
% |
$ |
55 |
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power |
|
18 |
|
13 |
|
|
34 |
|
8 |
|
Other operation |
|
(3) |
|
(7) |
|
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
Maintenance |
|
10 |
|
61 |
|
|
19 |
|
34 |
|
Depreciation |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
Amortization of regulatory assets/(liabilities), net |
|
(4) |
|
(62) |
|
|
(4) |
|
(97) |
|
Amortization of rate reduction bonds |
|
(2) |
|
(14) |
|
|
(5) |
|
(12) |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
20 |
|
8 |
|
|
49 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
(3) |
|
(10) |
|
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
2 |
|
14 |
|
|
3 |
|
8 |
|
Other income, net |
|
2 |
|
(a) |
|
|
4 |
|
(a) |
|
Income/(Loss) before income tax |
|
(3) |
|
(12) |
|
|
7 |
|
13 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
(4) |
|
(47) |
|
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
Net Income |
$ |
1 |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
6 |
|
17 |
% |
(a) Percent greater than 100.
Comparison of the Third Quarter of 2008 to the Third Quarter of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues increased $17 million in 2008 due to higher distribution segment revenues ($14 million) and higher transmission segment revenues ($3 million).
The distribution segment revenues increased $14 million primarily due to the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($15 million), partially offset by the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($1 million). The portion of distribution segment revenues that flows through to earnings decreased $1 million primarily due to lower retail sales. Retail sales decreased 2.2 percent in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
The $15 million distribution revenue increase that does not impact earnings is due to the components of retail revenues that are included in NHPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($21 million), partially offset by revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($7 million). The distribution revenue NHPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs increased $21 million primarily due to the pass-through of higher energy supply costs ($39 million) and higher retail transmission revenues ($3 million), partially offset by a decrease in the SCRC ($17 million) and lower REC revenue from the Northern Wood Power Plant ($3 million). The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
83
Transmission segment revenues increased $3 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power costs increased $18 million primarily due to higher forward energy market prices, partially offset by a decrease in payments to higher priced IPPs in 2008 as contracts expired.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses decreased $3 million primarily due to expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($7 million), partially offset by higher distribution segment expenses ($2 million), and higher transmission segment expenses ($1 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $10 million primarily due to higher generation segment expenses ($7 million) as a result of the Merrimack Station maintenance outages, higher hydro expenses ($1 million) primarily due to two major dam resurfacing projects and higher distribution lines ($1 million).
Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased $1 million primarily due to higher utility plant balances.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net
Amortization of regulatory assets/(liabilities), net decreased $4 million primarily due to the reduction in net deferrals associated with PSNH's ES, transmission cost adjustment mechanism (TCAM) and SCRC tracking mechanisms ($3 million) and a net reduction in amortizations related to PSNH 's 2004 and 2007 rate case settlements ($2 million).
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds decreased $2 million primarily due to the retirement of $50 million of rate reduction bonds in January 2008.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $2 million primarily due to higher long-tem debt interest resulting from the $70 million debt issuance in September 2007 and the $110 million debt issuance in May 2008 ($3 million), partially offset by lower short-term debt interest expense ($1 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $2 million primarily due to interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement resulting in a reduction to the effective tax rate.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased $4 million primarily due to plant related flow through differences ($3 million), resulting in a reduction to the effective tax rate, and lower pre-tax earnings ($1 million).
Comparison of the First Nine Months of 2008 to the First Nine Months of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues increased $55 million in 2008 due to higher distribution segment revenues ($45 million) and higher transmission segment revenues ($11 million).
The distribution segment revenues increased $45 million primarily due to the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($33 million) and the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($12 million). The portion of distribution segment revenues that flows through to earnings increased $12 million as a result of the rate increases effective July 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008 ($13 million), partially offset by lower retail sales ($1 million). Retail sales decreased 1.1 percent in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
The $33 million distribution revenue increase that does not impact earnings is due to the components of retail revenues that are included in NHPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($46 million), partially offset by revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($13 million). The distribution revenue NHPUC approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs increased $46 million primarily due to the pass-through of higher energy supply costs ($61 million), higher retail transmission revenues ($14 million), higher wholesale revenues ($8 million), partially offset by a decrease in the
84
SCRC ($41 million). The tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
Transmission segment revenues increased $11 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power costs increased $34 million primarily due to higher forward energy market prices, partially offset by a decrease in payments to higher priced IPPs in 2008 as contracts expired.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses increased $3 million primarily due to higher costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($9 million) due to retail transmission, higher distribution segment expenses ($4 million) primarily due to higher customer account expenses and higher transmission segment expenses ($2 million), partially offset by expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($13 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $19 million primarily due to higher fossil generation segment expenses ($9 million) primarily as a result of the Merrimack Station maintenance outages with the remainder of the increase primarily due to higher distribution segment expenses related to storms and the Reliability Enhancement Program (REP), which began on July 1, 2007.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased $1 million primarily due to higher utility plant balances.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets/(Liabilities), Net
Amortization of regulatory assets/(liabilities), net decreased $4 million primarily due to the reduction in net deferrals associated with PSNH's ES, TCAM and SCRC tracking mechanisms ($7 million), offset in part by a net increase in amortization, primarily from PSNH's 2007 rate case settlement ($3 million).
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds decreased $5 million primarily due to the retirement of $50 million of rate reduction bonds in January 2008.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes increased $1 million primarily due to higher property taxes.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $3 million primarily due to higher long-tem debt interest ($5 million) resulting from the $70 million debt issuance in September 2007 and the $110 million debt issuance in May 2008, partially offset by lower rate reduction bond interest resulting from lower principal balances outstanding ($2 million).
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $4 million primarily due to interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement ($2 million) and higher AFUDC equity income as a result of a higher eligible CWIP and lower short-term debt resulting in an increase in CWIP financed by equity ($2 million).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased $1 million primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, partially offset by lower plant related flow through impacts resulting in a reduction to the effective tax rate.
85
LIQUIDITY
PSNH had consolidated operating cash flows of $64.7 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with operating cash flows of $71.5 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2007. The decrease in 2008 operating cash flows was primarily due to an unfavorable shift in net working capital primarily related to taxes receivable.
Cash capital expenditures included on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows do not include amounts incurred on capital projects but not yet paid, cost of removal, the AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income. PSNHs cash capital expenditures totaled $164.8 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $113.1 million in the first nine months of 2007. This increase was primarily the result of higher transmission capital expenditures in 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, PSNH had no borrowings outstanding under the $400 million credit facility it shares with other NU subsidiaries. Financing activities for the first nine months of 2008 included a $110 million issuance of 10-year bonds and capital contributions from NU parent of $46.6 million, offset by $27.3 million in common dividends paid to NU parent.
86
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
WMECO is a wholly owned subsidiary of NU. This discussion should be read in conjunction with NU's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes in this Form 10-Q, the First and Second Quarter 2008 Form 10-Q and the NU 2007 Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table provides the variances in income statement line items for the condensed consolidated statements of income for WMECO included in this report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
Income Statement Variances
|
|
||||||||
|
Third
|
|
Percent |
|
Nine
|
|
Percent |
|
||
Operating Revenues |
$ |
(1) |
|
(1) |
% |
$ |
(23) |
|
(7) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power |
|
8 |
|
13 |
|
|
(7) |
|
(4) |
|
Other operation |
|
(7) |
|
(32) |
|
|
(16) |
|
(21) |
|
Maintenance |
|
1 |
|
18 |
|
|
2 |
|
11 |
|
Depreciation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Amortization of regulatory assets, net |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
3 |
|
34 |
|
Amortization of rate reduction bonds |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
(17) |
|
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
(3) |
|
(21) |
|
|
(6) |
|
(14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
Other income, net |
|
1 |
|
(a) |
|
|
1 |
|
65 |
|
Income/(loss) before income tax |
|
(2) |
|
(19) |
|
|
(5) |
|
(18) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
(2) |
|
(43) |
|
|
(3) |
|
(26) |
|
Net Income |
$ |
- |
|
- |
% |
$ |
(2) |
|
(12) |
% |
(a) Percent greater than 100.
Comparison of the Third Quarter of 2008 to the Third Quarter of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased $1 million in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to lower distribution segment revenues ($2 million), partially offset by higher transmission segment revenues ($1 million).
The distribution segment revenues decreased $2 million primarily due to the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($2 million) primarily due to a SQ performance assessment charge and lower retail sales. WMECO became subject to a SQ performance assessment charge for 2008 as a result of its reliability performance against the SQ metrics primarily as a result of significant storm activity. Retail sales decreased 5.6 percent in 2008 compared with 2007.
Transmission segment revenues increased $1 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expense increased $8 million primarily due to higher basic service supply costs, partially offset by an increased deferral of excess basic service expense over basic service revenue. The basic service supply costs are the contractual amounts we must pay to various suppliers that serve basic service load after winning a competitive solicitation process. To
87
the extent these costs do not match the revenues collected from customers, the DPU allows the difference to be deferred for future collection or refund.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses decreased $7 million primarily due to lower costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($6 million) such as retail transmission ($3 million), lower tracked administrative and general expenses ($2 million) mainly due to pension expense, and expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($3 million), partially offset by higher distribution segment expenses ($1 million).
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $1 million primarily due to higher underground distribution line maintenance primarily due to mandated DPU manhole rebuild work.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $1 million in 2008 primarily due to interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement.
Income Tax Expense/(Benefit)
Income tax expense decreased $2 million primarily due to lower pre-tax earnings ($1 million) and refinements of estimates associated with plant related deferred taxes ($1 million).
Comparison of the First Nine Months of 2008 to the First Nine Months of 2007
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased $23 million in 2008 due to lower distribution segment revenues ($26 million), partially offset by higher transmission segment revenues ($2 million).
The distribution segment revenues decreased $26 million primarily due to the portion of revenues that does not impact earnings ($24 million) and the component of revenues that flows through to earnings ($2 million). The $24 million distribution segment revenue decrease that does not impact earnings is due to the components of retail revenues that are included in DPU approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs ($20 million) and revenues that are eliminated in consolidation ($4 million). The distribution revenue DPU approved tracking mechanisms that track the recovery of certain incurred costs decreased $20 million primarily due to lower wholesale revenue ($9 million), lower pension tracker and default service true-up revenues ($8 million) and lower generation service revenue resulting from declining sales and reduction in load caused by customer migration to third party suppliers ($3 million). Tracking mechanisms allow for rates to be changed periodically with overcollections refunded to customers or undercollections recovered from customers in future periods.
The portion of the distribution segment that flows through to earnings decreased $2 million primarily due to lower retail sales ($2 million) and a service quality performance assessment charge ($1 million), partially offset by the rate increase effective January 1, 2008 ($2 million). Retail sales decreased 3.9 percent in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Transmission segment revenues increased $2 million primarily due to a higher transmission investment base, the impact of the March 24, 2008 FERC ROE decision and higher operating expenses that are passed through to customers under FERC-approved transmission tariffs.
Fuel, Purchased and Net Interchange Power
Fuel, purchased and net interchange power expense decreased $7 million primarily due to the deferral of excess basic service expense over basic service revenue, partially offset by an increase in basic service supply costs. The basic service supply costs are the contractual amounts we must pay to various suppliers that serve basic service load after winning a competitive solicitation process. To the extent these costs do not match the revenues collected from customers, the DPU allows the difference to be deferred for future collection or refund.
Other Operation
Other operation expenses decreased $16 million primarily due to lower costs that are tracked and recovered through distribution tracking mechanisms ($14 million) such as retail transmission ($8 million), lower tracked administrative and general expenses ($6 million) mainly due to pension expense, lower expenses that are eliminated in consolidation ($5 million), partially offset by higher distribution segment expenses ($3 million) such as employee medical and uncollectibles.
88
Maintenance
Maintenance expenses increased $2 million primarily due to higher distribution line maintenance. Of this amount, $1 million is related to mandated DPU manhole rebuild work.
Amortization of Regulatory Assets, Net
Amortization of regulatory assets, net increased $3 million primarily due to the deferral of transition revenues collected in excess of allowed transition costs resulting mainly from higher power contract market values lowering power contract net costs.
Amortization of Rate Reduction Bonds
Amortization of rate reduction bonds increased $1 million. The higher portion of principal within the rate reduction bonds payment results in a corresponding increase in the amortization of regulatory assets.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $1 million in 2008 primarily due to interest income related to the 2008 federal tax settlement.
Income Tax Expense/(Benefit)
Income tax expense decreased $3 million primarily due to lower pre-tax earnings ($2 million) and refinements of estimates associated with plant related deferred taxes.
LIQUIDITY
WMECO had positive consolidated operating cash flows of $29.2 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2008, compared with negative operating cash flows of $4 million, after rate reduction bond payments, in the first nine months of 2007. The improvement in 2008 operating cash flows was primarily due to the payment of $47.9 million in federal and state income taxes in the first quarter of 2007, which was a result of the 2006 sale of NUs competitive generation business and a favorable shift in net working capital, offset by a decrease in regulatory overrecoveries of approximately $34 million.
Cash capital expenditures included on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows do not include amounts incurred on capital projects but not yet paid, cost of removal, the AFUDC related to equity funds, and the capitalized portion of pension expense or income. WMECOs cash capital expenditures totaled $49.6 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $32.8 million in the first nine months of 2007. This increase was primarily the result of higher transmission capital expenditures in 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, WMECO had $19.9 million in borrowings outstanding under the $400 million credit facility it shares with other NU subsidiaries. Other financing activities for the first half of 2008 included a capital contribution from NU parent of $16.3 million, offset by $10.1 million in common dividends paid to NU parent.
89
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk Information
We utilize the sensitivity analysis methodology to disclose quantitative information for our commodity price risks (including where applicable capacity and ancillary components). Sensitivity analysis provides a presentation of the potential loss of future earnings, fair values or cash flows from market risk-sensitive instruments over a selected time period due to one or more hypothetical changes in commodity price components, or other similar price changes. Under sensitivity analysis, the fair value of the portfolio is a function of the underlying commodity components, contract prices and market prices represented by each derivative contract. For swaps, forward contracts and options, fair value reflects our best estimates considering over-the-counter quotations, time value and volatility factors of the underlying commitments. Exchange-traded futures and options are recorded at fair value based on closing exchange prices. The fair value of our other contracts is based on models. As Select Energy's contract volumes are winding down and are substantially hedged against price risks, the company has limited exposure to commodity price risks.
Wholesale Portfolio: When conducting sensitivity analyses of the change in the fair value of the wholesale portfolio, which includes a non-derivative power purchase contract, which would result from a hypothetical change in the future market price of electricity, the fair values of the contracts are determined from models that take into consideration estimated future market prices of electricity, the volatility of the market prices in each period, as well as the time value factors of the underlying commitments.
A hypothetical change in the fair value of the wholesale portfolio was determined assuming a 10 percent change in forward market prices. At September 30, 2008, we calculated the market price resulting from a 10 percent change in forward market prices of those contracts. A 10 percent increase in prices for all products would have resulted in a pre-tax increase in fair value of $4 million and a 10 percent decrease in prices for all products would have resulted in a pre-tax decrease in fair value of $4.4 million. A 10 percent increase in energy prices would have resulted in a $3.2 million pre-tax decrease, and a 10 percent decrease in energy prices would have resulted in a $2.8 million pre-tax increase. A 10 percent increase/(decrease) in capacity prices would have resulted in a $1.8 million pre-tax increase/(decrease). A 10 percent increase/(decrease) in ancillary prices would have resulted in a $5.4 million pre-tax increase/(decrease).
The impact of a change in electricity prices on wholesale transactions at September 30, 2008 are not necessarily representative of the results that will be realized, if such a change were to occur. Also, energy, capacity and ancillaries have different market volatilities. The derivative contracts in the wholesale portfolio are accounted for at fair value, and changes in market prices impact earnings.
Other Risk Management Activities
Interest Rate Risk Management: We manage our interest rate risk exposure in accordance with our written policies and procedures by maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rate long-term debt. At September 30, 2008, approximately 91 percent (85 percent including the long-term debt subject to the fixed-to-floating interest rate swap as variable rate long-term debt) of our long-term debt, including fees and interest due for spent nuclear fuel disposal costs, was at a fixed interest rate. The remaining long-term debt is at variable interest rates and is subject to interest rate risk that could result in earnings volatility. Assuming a one percentage point increase in our variable interest rate, annual interest expense would have increased by a pre-tax amount of $3.8 million. At September 30, 2008, we maintained a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap at NU parent to manage the interest rate risk associated with its $263 million of fixed-rate long-term debt.
Credit Risk Management: Credit risk relates to the risk of loss that we would incur as a result of non-performance by counterparties pursuant to the terms of our contractual obligations. We serve a wide variety of customers and suppliers that include IPPs, industrial companies, gas and electric utilities, oil and gas producers, financial institutions, and other energy marketers. Margin accounts exist within this diverse group, and we realize interest receipts and payments related to balances outstanding in these margin accounts. This wide customer and supplier mix generates a need for a variety of contractual structures, products and terms that, in turn, require us to manage the portfolio of market risk inherent in those transactions in a manner consistent with the parameters established by our risk management process.
Credit risks and market risks at NU Enterprises are monitored regularly by a Risk Oversight Council. The Risk Oversight Council is comprised of individuals from outside of the management of these activities that create these risk exposures and functions to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policies.
We track and re-balance the risk in our portfolio in accordance with fair value and other risk management methodologies that utilize forward price curves in the energy markets to estimate the size and probability of future potential exposure.
The NYMEX traded futures and option contracts cleared off the NYMEX exchange are ultimately guaranteed by NYMEX to Select Energy. Select Energy has established written credit policies with regard to its counterparties to minimize overall credit risk on all
90
types of transactions. These policies require an evaluation of potential counterparties' financial condition (including credit ratings), collateral requirements under certain circumstances (including cash in advance, LOCs, and parent guarantees), and the use of standardized agreements, which allow for the netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. This evaluation results in establishing credit limits prior to Select Energy entering into energy contracts. The appropriateness of these limits is subject to continuing review. Concentrations among these counterparties may impact Select Energy's overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that the counterparties may be similarly affected by changes to economic, regulatory or other conditions.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Select Energy had collateral balances deposited with counterparties of $11.6 million and $18.9 million, respectively, which is included in current assets - prepayments and other on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Our regulated companies are subject to credit risk from certain long-term or high-volume supply contracts with energy marketing companies. Our regulated companies manage the credit risk with these counterparties in accordance with established credit risk practices and maintain an oversight group that monitors contracting risks, including credit risk.
We have implemented an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) methodology for identifying the principal risks of the company. ERM involves the application of a well-defined, enterprise-wide methodology that will enable our Risk and Capital Committee, comprised of our senior officers, to oversee the identification, management and reporting of the principal risks of the business. However, there can be no assurances that the ERM process will identify every risk or event that could impact our financial condition or results of operations. The findings of this process are periodically discussed with our Board of Trustees.
Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are set forth in Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," included in this combined report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
NU, CL&P, PSNH and WMECO (the Companies) evaluated the design and operation of their disclosure controls and procedures at September 30, 2008 to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the disclosure of required information is made timely and in accordance with the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC. This evaluation was made under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of each respective Company, as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of each respective Company have concluded, based on their review, that each Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Company in its respective reports under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and regulations and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting for any of the Companies during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controls over financial reporting.
91
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are parties to various legal proceedings. We have identified these legal proceedings in Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings" and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes with regard to the legal proceedings previously disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K, as modified by our disclosure under Item 1, "Legal Proceedings" in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.
Yankee Companies v. U.S. Department of Energy
Yankee Atomic Energy Company (YAEC), Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MYAPC) and Connecticut Yankee Power Company (CYAPC) (collectively, the Yankee Companies) commenced litigation in 1998 against the United States Department of Energy (DOE) charging that the federal government breached contracts it entered into with each company in 1983 under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, to begin removing spent nuclear fuel from the respective nuclear plants no later than January 31, 1998 in return for payments by each company into the Nuclear Waste Fund. The funds for those payments were collected from regional electric customers. The Yankee Companies initially claimed damages for incremental spent nuclear fuel storage, security, construction and other costs through 2010.
In a ruling released on October 4, 2006, the Court of Federal Claims held that the DOE was liable for damages to CYAPC for $34.2 million through 2001, YAEC for $32.9 million through 2001 and MYAPC for $75.8 million through 2002 (the 2006 ruling) but did not award the Yankee Companies future damages covering the period beyond the 2001/2002 damages award dates. In December 2007, the Yankee Companies filed a second round of lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual damages incurred in the years following 2001/2002. The application of any damages, which are ultimately recovered to benefit customers, is established in the Yankee Companies' FERC-approved rate settlement agreements, although implementation will be subject to the final determination of the FERC. CL&P, PSNH and WMECO expect to pass any recovery onto their customers; therefore, no earnings impact is expected to result.
In December 2006, the DOE appealed the 2006 ruling, and the Yankee Companies filed cross-appeals. The Court of Appeals issued its decision on August 7, 2008 effectively agreeing with the trial courts findings as to the liability of the DOE but disagreeing with the method that the trial court used to calculate damages. The Court of Appeals vacated the decision and remanded the case for new findings consistent with its decision.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
NU is subject to a variety of significant risks in addition to the matters set forth under "Forward Looking Statements," in Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Other Matters." We have identified a number of these risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. NUs susceptibility to certain risks, including those discussed in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, could exacerbate other risks. These risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating NUs risk profile. There have been no material changes with regard to the risk factors previously disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There were no purchases made by or on behalf of NU or any "affiliated purchaser" (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
92
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Each document described below is incorporated by reference by the registrant(s) listed to the files identified, unless designated with a (*), which exhibits are filed herewith.
Exhibit No.
Description
Listing of Exhibits (NU)
*10.1
Ninth Supplemental Indenture of Mortgage dated as of October 1, 2008 between Yankee Gas Services Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), as Trustee
*10.2
Special Severance Program for Officers of NU System Companies, Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees on January 13, 1998; Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009
*10.3
NU Incentive Plan, Amended, Restated and Adopted by Northeast Utilities Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees on February 13, 2007 as Approved by Northeast Utilities Shareholders on May 8, 2007; Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009
*10.4
Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees on January 13, 1998; Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009
*10.5
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of NU System Companies, Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009
*10.6
Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Trustees, Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees on January 22, 1980, Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009
*12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
*15
Deloitte & Touche LLP Letter Regarding Unaudited Financial Information
*31
Certification of Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Northeast Utilities, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*31.1
Certification of David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northeast Utilities, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*32
Certification of Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Northeast Utilities and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northeast Utilities, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
Listing of Exhibits (CL&P)
*10
Release Agreement dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among Ambac Assurance Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee with respect to the Bonds, The Connecticut Light and Power Company, and the Connecticut Development Authority
*10.1
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, amending that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement made and dated as of January 1, 1997, by and between the Connecticut Development Authority and The Connecticut Light and Power Company
*10.2
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust dated as of October 1, 2008, amending that certain Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust made and dated as of January 1, 1997, by and between the Connecticut Development Authority and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor-in-interest to Fleet National Bank)
*12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
93
*31
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*31.1
Certification of David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*32
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of The Connecticut Light and Power Company and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
Listing of Exhibits (PSNH)
*12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
*31
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*31.1
Certification of David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*32
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Company of New Hampshire and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
Listing of Exhibits (WMECO)
*12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
*31
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of Western Massachusetts Electric Company, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*31.1
Certification of David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Western Massachusetts Electric Company, required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
*32
Certification of Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of Western Massachusetts Electric Company and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Western Massachusetts Electric Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2008
94
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
NORTHEAST UTILITIES |
(Registrant) |
By |
/s/ David R. McHale |
|
Date |
|
David R. McHale |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 7, 2008 |
|
(for the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
____________________________________________________________________________________
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY |
(Registrant) |
By |
/s/ David R. McHale |
|
Date |
|
David R. McHale |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 7, 2008 |
|
(for the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
95
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
(Registrant) |
By |
/s/ David R. McHale |
|
Date |
|
David R. McHale |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 7, 2008 |
|
(for the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
____________________________________________________________________________________
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY |
(Registrant) |
By |
/s/ David R. McHale |
|
Date |
|
David R. McHale |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 7, 2008 |
|
(for the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
96
Exhibit 10.1
NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
from
YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY
to
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
TRUSTEE
_________________________________
Dated as of October 1, 2008
Supplemental to Indenture of Mortgage
and Deed of Trust from
Yankee Gas Services Company to
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor as trustee to
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., successor to
The Bank of New York, successor to
Fleet National Bank, formerly known as
The Connecticut National Bank), Trustee,
dated as of July 1, 1989
NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of October 1, 2008 between YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY, a specially chartered Connecticut corporation (herein called the "Company ), and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., a national banking corporation, successor as trustee to The Bank of New York, as successor to Fleet National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), as Trustee (the "Trustee ) under the Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of July 1, 1989, executed and delivered by the Company (herein called the "Original Indenture ; the Original Indenture and any and all indentures and instruments supplemental thereto, including, without limitation, this Ninth Supplemental Indenture, being herein called the "Indenture );
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 13.01(C), 13.01(G), 3.03 and Article Five of the Original Indenture, the Company desires to provide for the issuance under the Indenture of a new series of Bonds, which Bonds will be secured by and entitled to the benefits of the Indenture, and to add to its covenants and agreements contained in the Original Indenture certain other covenants and agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Company proposes to effect the amendments to the Indenture hereinafter specified;
WHEREAS, all acts and things necessary to make this Ninth Supplemental Indenture a valid, binding and legal instrument have been performed, and the issuance of the new series of Bonds, subject to the terms of the Original Indenture, has been duly authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company and approved by the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, and the Company has requested and hereby requests the Trustee to enter into and join the Company in the execution and delivery of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture;
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE WITNESSETH, that, to secure the payment of the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on the Outstanding Secured Bonds, including the new series of Bonds hereunder issued, and the performance of the covenants therein and herein contained and to declare the terms and conditions on which all such Outstanding Secured Bonds are secured, and in consideration of the premises and of the purchase of the Bonds by the Holders thereof, the Company by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, assign, transfer, mortgage, hypothecate, pledge, set over and confirm to the Trustee, all property, rights, privileges and franchises of the Company of every kind and description, real, personal or mixed, tangible and intangible, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by the Company, wherever located, and grants a security interest therein for the purposes herein expressed, except any Excepted Property which is expressly excepted from the lien hereof in the Original Indenture, and including, without limitation, all and singular the following:
All property, rights, privileges and franchises particularly described in the Original Indenture, and any and all indentures and instruments supplemental thereto, including, without limitation, the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1992, the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 1, 1992, the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 1995, the Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1997, the Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 1999, the Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2004, the Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 2004, the Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005, and in addition, all the property, rights, privileges and franchises particularly described in Schedule A annexed to this Ninth Supplemental Indenture, which are hereby made a part of, and deemed to be described herein, as fully as if set forth herein at length.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all said property, rights, privileges and franchises of every kind and description, real, personal or mixed, hereby and hereafter (by supplemental indenture or otherwise) granted, bargained, sold, aliened, remised, released, conveyed, assigned, transferred, mortgaged, hypothecated, pledged, set over or confirmed as aforesaid, or intended, agreed or covenanted so to be, together with all the appurtenances thereto appertaining (said properties, rights, privileges and franchises, including any cash and securities hereafter deposited or required to be deposited with the Trustee (other than any such cash which is specifically stated herein not to be deemed part of the Trust Estate), being herein collectively called "Trust Estate") unto the Trustee and its successors and assigns forever.
SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to Permitted Encumbrances (as defined in Section 1.01 of the Original Indenture).
BUT IN TRUST, NEVERTHELESS, for the proportionate and equal benefit and security of the Holders from time to time of all the Outstanding Secured Bonds without any preference or priority of any such Bond over any other such Bond.
UPON CONDITION that, until the happening of an Event of Default (as defined in Section 1.01 of the Original Indenture) and subject to the provisions of Article Six of the Original Indenture, the Company shall be permitted to possess and use the Trust Estate, except cash, securities and other personal property deposited and pledged, or required to be deposited and pledged, with the Trustee, and to receive and use the rents, issues, profits, revenues and other income of the Trust Estate.
AND IT IS HEREBY DECLARED that in order to set forth the terms and provisions of the new series of Bonds and in consideration of the premises and of the purchase and acceptance of such Bonds by the holders thereof, and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) to it duly paid by the Trustee, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and for the purpose of securing the faithful performance and observance of all the covenants and conditions
- 2 -
of the Indenture, the Company hereby covenants and agrees with the Trustee and provides as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
Section 1.01.
Terms from the Original Indenture. All defined terms used in this Ninth Supplemental Indenture and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Original Indenture.
Section 1.02.
References are to Ninth Supplemental Indenture. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Articles, Sections and other subdivisions of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture, and the words "herein," "hereof," "hereby," "hereunder" and words of similar import refer to this Ninth Supplemental Indenture as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or other subdivision hereof or to the Original Indenture.
ARTICLE II
SERIES J BONDS
Section 2.01
Specific Title, Terms and Forms. There is hereby created and shall be outstanding under and secured by the Indenture a series of Bonds entitled "First Mortgage Bonds, 6.90% Series J, Due 2018" (herein called the "Series J Bonds" ), limited in aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding to One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000). The form of the Series J Bonds shall be substantially as set forth in Exhibit A hereto with such insertions, omissions, substitutions and variations as may be determined by the officers executing the same as evidenced by their execution thereof.
The Series J Bonds shall be issued as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $500,000 or any amount in excess thereof which is an integral multiple of $250,000 (except as may be necessary to reflect any principal amount not evenly divisible by $250,000 remaining after any partial redemption), or in such other denominations as the Trustee may approve. The Series J Bonds shall be numbered J-1 and consecutively upwards, or in any other manner deemed appropriate by the Trustee. The Series J Bonds shall mature on October 1, 2018 and shall bear interest from the date of issuance thereof (or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for) at the rate of 6.90% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months). Interest Payment Dates for the Series J Bonds shall
- 3 -
be (i) April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing April 1, 2009, and (ii) at the Stated Maturity of the principal.
Notwithstanding the otherwise applicable provisions of the Indenture, the principal and the Redemption Price of, and interest on, the Series J Bonds shall be payable by Federal funds bank wire transfer of immediately available funds so long as required by Section 5.1 of the Bond Purchase Agreements, each dated October 7, 2008, between the Company and the initial purchasers of the Series J Bonds (the " Bond Purchase Agreements ") or, in the event such section shall no longer be applicable, at the office or agency of the Company in New York, New York, in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for public or private debts.
The Regular Record Date referred to in Section 3.09 of the Original Indenture for the payment of the interest on the Series J Bonds payable, and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any Interest Payment Date shall be the 1st day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date.
Section 2.02
No Sinking Fund; No Mandatory Scheduled Redemptions Prior to Final Maturity. The Series J Bonds shall not be subject to any sinking fund or mandatory scheduled redemption prior to final maturity.
Section 2.03
Optional Redemption. The Series J Bonds shall be redeemable at the option of the Company in whole at any time or in part from time to time prior to their Stated Maturity, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Series J Bonds being prepaid plus accrued interest thereon to the date of such redemption together with a premium equal to the then applicable Make-Whole Amount.
The Company will give notice of any optional redemption of the Series J Bonds pursuant to this Section 2.03 to each Holder thereof not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days before the date fixed for such optional redemption, specifying (a) such date, (b) the principal amount of the Holder's Bond to be redeemed on such date, (c) that a premium may be payable, (d) the estimated premium, calculated as of the day such notice is given, and (e) the accrued interest applicable to the redemption. Such notice of redemption shall also certify all facts, if any, which are conditions precedent to any such redemption. Notice of redemption having been so given, the aggregate principal amount of the Series J Bonds specified in such notice, together with accrued interest thereon, and the premium, if any, payable with respect thereto shall become due and payable on the redemption date specified in such notice. Two business days prior to the redemption date specified in such notice of optional redemption, the Company shall provide the Trustee and each Holder of a Bond written notice of whether or not any premium is payable in connection with such redemption, the premium, if any, calculated as of the second business day prior to the redemption date, and a reasonably detailed computation of the Make-Whole Amount. The Trustee shall be under no duty to inquire into, may
- 4 -
conclusively presume the correctness of, and shall be fully protected in acting upon the Companys calculation of any Make-Whole Amount.
For purposes of this Section 2.03, the term "Make-Whole Amount," as calculated by the Company, shall mean in connection with any optional redemption of the Series J Bonds the excess, if any, of (a) the aggregate present value as of the date of such redemption of each dollar of principal amount of Series J Bonds being redeemed and the amount of interest (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption) that would have been payable in respect of such dollar if such redemption had not been made, determined by discounting such amounts at the Reinvestment Rate from the respective dates on which they would have been payable, over (b) 100% of the principal amount of the outstanding Series J Bonds being redeemed.
The "Reinvestment Rate" means (1) the sum of 0.50% plus the yield reported on page "USD" of the Bloomberg Treasury/Money Market Monitor Screen (or, if not available, any other nationally recognized trading screen reporting on-line intraday trading in United States government securities) at 12:00 noon (New York time) on such date for United States government securities having a maturity rounded to the nearest month corresponding to the remaining Weighted Average Life to Maturity of the principal being redeemed, prepaid or paid or (2) in the event that no such nationally recognized trading screen reporting on-line intraday trading in United States government Securities is available, Reinvestment Rate means 0.50% plus the arithmetic mean of the yields under the respective headings "This Week" and "Last Week" published in the Statistical Release under the caption "Treasury Constant Maturities" for the maturity (rounded to the nearest month) corresponding to the Weighted Average Life to Maturity of the principal being redeemed. If no maturity exactly corresponds to such Weighted Average Life to Maturity, yields for the two published maturities most closely corresponding to such Weighted Average Life to Maturity shall be calculated pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence, and the Reinvestment Rate shall be interpolated or extrapolated from such yields on a straight-line basis, rounding in each of such relevant periods to the nearest month. For purposes of calculating the Reinvestment Rate, the most recent Statistical Release published prior to the date of determination of the Make-Whole Amount shall be used.
For purposes of this Section 2.03, "Weighted Average Life to Maturity" of the principal amount of the Series J Bonds being redeemed shall mean, as of the time of any determination thereof, the number of years obtained by dividing the then Remaining Dollar-Years of such principal by the aggregate amount of such principal. The term "Remaining Dollar-Years" of such principal shall mean the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of principal that would have become due at the Stated Maturity of the Series J Bonds if such redemption had not been made by the number of years (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth) which will elapse between the date of determination and the Stated Maturity of the Series J Bonds.
- 5 -
As used in this Section 2.03, "Statistical Release" shall mean the then most recently published statistical release designated "H.15(519)" or any successor publication which is published weekly by the Federal Reserve System and which establishes yields on actively traded United States government securities adjusted to constant maturities or, if such statistical release is not published at the time of any determination hereunder, then such other reasonably comparable index which shall be designated by the Holders of 66-2/3% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Series J Bonds.
The principal amount, if any, of the Series J Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to this Section 2.03 shall be selected on a pro rata basis from all Series J Bonds Outstanding on the Redemption Date.
The Series J Bonds shall not be redeemable at the option of the Company prior to their Stated Maturity other than as provided in this Section 2.03.
Section 2.04.
Place of Payment. The principal and the redemption price of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on, the Series J Bonds shall be payable at the principal corporate trust office of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., in New York, New York.
Section 2.05.
Exchangeability. Subject to Section 3.07 of the Original Indenture, all Series J Bonds shall be fully interchangeable, and, upon surrender at the office or agency of the Company in a Place of Payment therefor, shall be exchangeable for other Series J Bonds of a different authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by the Holder surrendering the same. The Company will execute, and the Trustee shall authenticate and deliver, Series J Bonds whenever the same are required for any such exchange.
Section 2.06.
Bond Purchase Agreements. Reference is made to Sections 5 and 7 of the Bond Purchase Agreements for certain provisions governing the rights and obligations of the Company, the Trustee and the Holders of the Series J Bonds. Such provisions are deemed to be incorporated in this Article II by reference as if set forth herein at length.
Section 2.07.
Restrictions on Transfer. All Series J Bonds originally issued hereunder shall bear the following legend:
THIS SECURITY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "1933 ACT"). THE HOLDER HEREOF, BY PURCHASING THIS SECURITY, AGREES FOR THE BENEFIT OF YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY (THE "COMPANY") AND PRIOR HOLDERS THAT THIS SECURITY MAY BE OFFERED, RESOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED ONLY (1) TO THE COMPANY (UPON REDEMPTION THEREOF OR OTHERWISE), (2) SO LONG AS THIS SECURITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR
- 6 -
RESALE PURSUANT TO RULE 144A, TO A PERSON WHO THE SELLER REASONABLY BELIEVES IS A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER, WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A UNDER THE 1933 ACT, IN A TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144A, (3) IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION S UNDER THE 1933 ACT, (4) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 144 (IF AVAILABLE) UNDER THE 1933 ACT, (5) IN RELIANCE ON ANOTHER EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1933 ACT, SUBJECT TO THE RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY OF AN OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE EFFECT THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1933 ACT OR (6) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE 1933 ACT, SUBJECT (IN THE CASE OF CLAUSES (2), (3), (4) AND (5)) TO THE RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY OF A CERTIFICATION OF THE TRANSFEROR TO THE EFFECT THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1933 ACT, AND IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES. THE HOLDER OF THIS SECURITY WILL, AND EACH SUBSEQUENT HOLDER IS REQUIRED TO, NOTIFY ANY PURCHASER OF THIS SECURITY FROM IT OF THE RESALE RESTRICTIONS REFERRED TO HEREIN.
All Series J Bonds issued upon transfer or exchange thereof shall bear such legend unless the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel which states that the Series J Bonds may be issued without such legend. All Series J Bonds issued upon transfer or exchange of a Series J Bond or Bonds which do not bear such legend shall be issued without such legend. The Company may from time to time modify the foregoing restrictions on resale and other transfers, without the consent of but upon notice to the Holders, in order to reflect any amendment to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 or change in the interpretation thereof or practices thereunder.
Section 2.08.
Authentication and Delivery. Upon the execution of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture, the Series J Bonds shall be executed by the Company and delivered to the Trustee for authentication, and thereupon the same shall be authenticated and delivered by the Trustee pursuant to and upon Company Request.
Section 2.09.
Default . Pursuant to the Original Indenture (and notwithstanding any provision of Section 9.22 thereof to the contrary), for purposes of determining whether an Event of Default exists with respect to the Series J Bonds, any default in payment (whether due as a scheduled installment of principal or interest, or at original maturity or earlier redemption or acceleration, or otherwise) with respect to Bonds of any other series which constitutes an Event of Default with respect to the Bonds of such series shall also constitute an Event of Default with respect to the Series J Bonds.
- 7 -
Section 2.10. Consent to Amendment of Available Income Certificate Requirement. Each Holder of a Series J Bond (including any successors and assigns and any owner of a book-entry interest therein), solely by virtue of its acquisition thereof, shall have and be deemed to have irrevocably consented, without the need for any further action or consent by such Holder, to any and all amendments to the Indenture which are intended to eliminate or modify in any manner the requirement for an Available Income Certificate in connection with the issuance of additional bonds upon the basis of retirement of bonds, as provided for in Section 5.03(C)(2) thereof.
Section 2.11 .
Consent to Amendment and Restatement of Mortgage Indenture. Each Holder of a Series J Bond (including any successors and assigns and any owner of a book-entry interest therein), solely by virtue of its acquisition thereof, shall have and be deemed to have consented, without the need for any further action or consent by such Holder, to the amendment and restatement of the Indenture in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B to this Ninth Supplemental Indenture (the Amended and Restated Indenture ), with such additions, deletions, and other changes made to such form prior to the time of such amendment and restatement ( Future Changes ) (1) that add to the covenants of the Company in the Amended and Restated Indenture, or surrender rights or powers of the Company therein, for the benefit of the Holders of the Outstanding Bonds, (2) as shall be requested by the Trustee and its counsel, (3) as may be requested by the Department of Public Utility Control of the State of Connecticut or other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Company, or (4) otherwise, as shall be proposed by the Company after the date of the execution and delivery of the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, provided that (a) in the case of any Future Change described in clause (4), such Future Change is not, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, inconsistent with the fundamental structure and terms of the Amended and Restated Indenture, and (b) in the case of any Future Change described in clause (3) or (4), such Future Change does not, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of the Holders of the Bonds.
ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 3.01.
Effectiveness and Ratification of Indenture. The provisions of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture shall be effective from and after the execution hereof; and the Indenture, as hereby supplemented, shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3.02.
Titles. The titles of the several Articles and Sections of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture shall not be deemed to be any part thereof, are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any interpretation hereof.
- 8 -
Section 3.03.
Acceptance of Trust; Not Responsible for Recitals; Etc. The Trustee hereby accepts the trusts herein declared, provided, created or supplemented and agrees to perform the same upon the terms and conditions herein and in the Original Indenture, as heretofore supplemented, set forth and upon the following terms and conditions:
The Trustee shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever for or in respect of the validity or sufficiency of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture or for or in respect of the recitals contained herein, all of which recitals are made by the Company solely. In general, each and every term and condition contained in Article Ten of the Original Indenture shall apply to and form part of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture with the same force and effect as if the same were herein set forth in full with such omissions, variations and insertions, if any, as may be appropriate to make the same conform to the provisions of this Ninth Supplemental Indenture.
Section 3.04.
Successors and Assigns. All covenants, provisions, stipulations and agreements in this Ninth Supplemental Indenture contained are and shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns, and (subject to the provisions of the Bond Purchase Agreements) of the Holders and registered owners from time to time of the Bonds issued and outstanding under and secured by the Indenture (except that the provisions of Article II hereof are and shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Holders of the Series J Bonds).
Section 3.05.
Counterparts. This Ninth Supplemental Indenture may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 3.06.
Governing Law. The laws of the State of Connecticut shall govern this Ninth Supplemental Indenture and the Series J Bonds, except to the extent that the validity or perfection of the lien of the Indenture, or remedies thereunder, are governed by the laws of a jurisdiction other than the State of Connecticut.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
- 9 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Ninth Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed, sealed and attested as of the day and year first above written.
YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY
By___ /s/ Patricia C. Cosgel _________
Name: Patricia C. Cosgel
Title: Assistant Treasurer - Finance
Attest:
/s/ O. Kay Comendul _____________
Name: O.Kay Comendul
Title: Assistant Secretary
Executed, sealed and delivered by
YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY
in the presence of:
_ /s/ Leonard Rodriguez _____________
_ /s/ Lisa Barlow________________
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee
By_ /s/ Vaneta Bernard
Name: Vaneta Bernard
Title: Vice President
Attest:
/s/ Diana Kenelly _________________
Executed, sealed and delivered by
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
as Trustee, in the presence of:
___ /s/ [illegible] ______________________________
__/s/ [illegible]_______________________________
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
)
) ss.: Berlin
COUNTY OF HARTFORD
)
On this 6th day of October, 2008, before me, Lisa M. Barlow, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Patricia C. Cosgel and O. Kay Comendul, who acknowledged themselves to be the Assistant Treasurer Finance and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Yankee Gas Services Company, a Connecticut corporation, and that they, as such officers, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by themselves as such officers, and as their free act and deed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
__ /s/ Lisa M. Barlow ________________
Lisa M. Barlow
Notary Public
My commission expires: March 31, 2011
(SEAL)
STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
) ss.:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
)
On this 7th day of October, 2008, before me, Chi C. Ma, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Vaneta Bernard and Diana Kenelly who acknowledged themselves to be Vice President and Vice President respectively, of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., a national banking corporation, and that they, as such officers, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the association by themselves as such officers, and as their free act and deed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
________ /s/ Chi C. Ma _________________
Notary Public
My commission expires: Sept. 3. 2010
(SEAL)
SCHEDULE A
ALL THE PROPERTY, RIGHT, PRIVILEGES AND FRANCHISES AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTIONS.
EXHIBIT A
[FORM OF FIRST MORTGAGE BOND, 6.90% SERIES J, DUE 2018]
THIS SECURITY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "1933 ACT"). THE HOLDER HEREOF, BY PURCHASING THIS SECURITY, AGREES FOR THE BENEFIT OF YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY (THE "COMPANY") AND PRIOR HOLDERS THAT THIS SECURITY MAY BE OFFERED, RESOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED ONLY (1) TO THE COMPANY (UPON REDEMPTION THEREOF OR OTHERWISE), (2) SO LONG AS THIS SECURITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR RESALE PURSUANT TO RULE 144A, TO A PERSON WHO THE SELLER REASONABLY BELIEVES IS A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER, WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A UNDER THE 1933 ACT, IN A TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144A, (3) IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION S UNDER THE 1933 ACT, (4) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 144 (IF AVAILABLE) UNDER THE 1933 ACT, (5) IN RELIANCE ON ANOTHER EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1933 ACT, SUBJECT TO THE RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY OF AN OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE EFFECT THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1933 ACT OR (6) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE 1933 ACT, SUBJECT (IN THE CASE OF CLAUSES (2), (3), (4) AND (5)) TO THE RECEIPT BY THE COMPANY OF A CERTIFICATION OF THE TRANSFEROR TO THE EFFECT THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1933 ACT, AND IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES. THE HOLDER OF THIS SECURITY WILL, AND EACH SUBSEQUENT HOLDER IS REQUIRED TO, NOTIFY ANY PURCHASER OF THIS SECURITY FROM IT OF THE RESALE RESTRICTIONS REFERRED TO HEREIN.
Yankee Gas Services Company
First Mortgage Bonds,
6.90% Series J, Due 2018
CUSIP Number: 98478* AP 2
No. J -
Principal Amount: $
Stated Maturity of Principal: October 1, 2018
Applicable Rate: 6.90%
Interest Payment Dates:
April 1 and October 1, commencing April 1, 2009 and at the Stated Maturity of the principal
Yankee Gas Services Company, a specially chartered Connecticut corporation (hereinafter called the "Company", which term includes any successor corporation under the Indenture hereinafter referred to), for value received, hereby promises to pay to [___________], or registered assigns, at the Stated Maturity set forth above, the Principal Amount set forth above (or so much thereof as shall not have been paid upon prior redemption) and to pay interest (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) thereon from the date of issuance hereof or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, on each Interest Payment Date set forth above in each year at the Applicable Rate set forth above. The interest so payable, and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any Interest Payment Date will, as provided in said Indenture, be paid to the Person in whose name this Bond (or one or more Predecessor Bonds, as defined in said Indenture) is registered at the close of business on the Regular Record Date for such interest, which shall be the 1st day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Any such interest not so punctually paid or duly provided for shall be paid to the Person in whose name this Bond is registered on the business day immediately preceding the date of such payment. If all or any portion of the principal of, or the premium (if any) or interest on, this Bond shall not be paid when due, the amount not so paid shall bear interest at the lesser of (x) the highest rate allowed by applicable law or (y) the greater of (i) the Prime Rate (as defined in the Bond Purchase Agreements) or (ii) 7.90% (the Applicable Rate plus 1% per annum).
The principal and the Redemption Price of, and the interest on, this Bond shall be payable at the principal corporate trust office of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., in New York, New York. All such payments shall be made in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for payment of public and private debts.
This Series J Bond is one of a duly authorized issue of Bonds of the Company designated as its "First Mortgage Bonds" (herein called the "Bonds"), issued and to be issued in one or
more series under, and all equally and ratably secured by, an Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of July 1, 1989 (herein, together with any indenture or instruments supplemental thereto, including the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1992, the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 1, 1992, the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 1995, the Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1997, the Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 1999, the Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2004, the Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 2004, the Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005, and the Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 2008 (the Ninth Supplemental Indenture), called the "Indenture"), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor as trustee to The Bank of New York, successor to Fleet National Bank (formerly known as The Connecticut National Bank), as Trustee (herein called the "Trustee," which term includes any successor Trustee under the Indenture). Reference is hereby made to the Indenture for a description of the properties thereby mortgaged, pledged and assigned, the nature and extent of the security, the respective rights thereunder of the Holders of the Bonds, the Trustee and the Company, and the terms upon which the Bonds are, and are to be, authenticated and delivered. All capitalized terms used in this Bond which are not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Indenture. Reference is also made to the Bond Purchase Agreements, as defined in the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, for a further description of the respective rights of the Holders of the Series J Bonds, the Company and the Trustee, and the terms applicable to the Series J Bonds.
As provided in the Indenture, the Bonds are issuable in series which may vary as in the Indenture provided or permitted. This Series J Bond is one of the series specified in its title.
The Series J Bonds are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory scheduled redemption prior to final maturity.
As provided in the Indenture, at the option of the Company, the Series J Bonds shall be redeemable in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to their Stated Maturity, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Series J Bonds being prepaid plus accrued interest thereon to the date of such redemption together with a premium equal to the then applicable Make-Whole Amount.
The Company will give notice of any optional redemption of the Series J Bonds pursuant to Section 2.03 of the Ninth Supplemental Indenture to each Holder thereof not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days before the date fixed for such optional redemption, specifying (a) such date, (b) the principal amount of the Holder's Bond to be redeemed on such date, (c) that a premium may be payable, (d) the estimated premium, calculated as of the day such notice is given and (e) the accrued interest applicable to the redemption. Such notice of redemption shall also certify all facts, if any, which are conditions precedent to any such redemption. Notice of redemption having been so given, the aggregate principal amount of the Series J Bonds specified in such notice, together with accrued interest thereon, and the premium, if any, payable with respect thereto shall become due and payable on the redemption date specified in such notice. Two business days prior to the redemption date specified in such
- 2 -
notice of optional redemption, the Company shall provide the Trustee and each Holder of a Bond written notice of whether or not any premium is payable in connection with such redemption, the premium, if any, calculated as of the second business day prior to the redemption date, and a reasonably detailed computation of the Make-Whole Amount.
Bonds (or portions thereof) for whose redemption and payment provision is made in accordance with the Indenture shall thereupon cease to be entitled to the lien of the Indenture and shall cease to bear interest from and after the date fixed for redemption (in each event, so long as the payment due on any such date shall be made). The principal amount of the Series J Bonds to be redeemed upon any optional redemption thereof shall be applied pro rata to all such Series J Bonds Outstanding on the Redemption Date.
If an Event of Default, as defined in the Indenture, shall occur, the principal of the Series J Bonds may become or be declared due and payable in the manner and with the effect provided in the Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreements.
The Indenture permits, with certain exceptions as therein provided, the amendment thereof and the modification of the rights and obligations of the Company and the rights of the Holders of the Bonds under the Indenture at any time by the Company with the consent of the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds of all series at the time Outstanding affected by such modification. The Indenture also contains provisions permitting the Holders of specified percentages in principal amount of Bonds at the time Outstanding on behalf of the Holders of all the Bonds, to waive compliance by the Company with certain provisions of the Indenture and certain past defaults under the Indenture and their consequences. Any such consent or waiver agreed to as set forth above by the Holder of this Bond shall be conclusive and binding upon such Holder and upon all future Holders of this Bond and of any Bond issued upon the transfer hereof or in exchange hereof or in lieu hereof, whether or not notation of such consent or waiver is made upon this Bond.
As set forth in the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, each Holder of a Series J Bond (including any successors and assigns and any owner of a book-entry interest therein), solely by virtue of its acquisition thereof, shall have and be deemed to have irrevocably consented, without the need for any further action or consent by such Holder, to any and all amendments to the Indenture which are intended to eliminate or modify in any manner the requirement for an Available Income Certificate in connection with the issuance of additional bonds upon the basis of retirement of bonds, as provided for in Section 5.03(C)(2) thereof.
As set forth in the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, each Holder of a Series J Bond, (including any successors and assigns and any owner of a book-entry interest therein), solely by virtue of its acquisition thereof, has and has been deemed to have consented, without the need for any further action or consent by such Holder, to the amendment and restatement of the Indenture in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B appended to such Supplemental Indenture (the Amended and Restated Indenture), with such additions, deletions, and other changes made to such form prior to the time of such amendment and restatement ( Future Changes ) (1) that add to the covenants of the Company in the Amended and Restated Indenture,
- 3 -
or surrender rights or powers of the Company therein, for the benefit of the Holders of the Outstanding Bonds, (2) as shall be requested by the Trustee and its counsel, (3) as may be requested by the Department of Public Utility Control of the State of Connecticut or other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Company, or (4) otherwise, as shall be proposed by the Company after the date of the execution and delivery of the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, provided that (a) in the case of any Future Change described in clause (4), such Future Change is not, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, inconsistent with the fundamental structure and terms of the Amended and Restated Indenture, and (b) in the case of any Future Change described in clause (3) or (4), such Future Change does not, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of the Holders of the Bonds.
No reference herein to the Indenture and no provision of this Bond or of the Indenture shall alter or impair the obligation of the Company, which is absolute and unconditional, to pay the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on this Bond at the times, places and rates, and in the coin or currency, herein prescribed.
As provided in the Indenture and subject to certain limitations therein set forth, this Bond is transferable on the Bond Register of the Company, upon surrender of this Bond for transfer at the office or agency of the Company in New York, New York, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Company and the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the Registered Holder hereof or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, and thereupon one or more new Bonds of the same series, or authorized denominations and for the same aggregate principal amount, will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees.
All Bonds of this series shall be fully interchangeable, and, upon surrender at the office or agency of the Company in a Place of Payment therefor, shall be exchangeable for other Bonds of this series of a different authorized denomination or denominations, as requested by the Holder surrendering the same.
No service charge shall be made for any transfer or exchange hereinbefore referred to, but the Company may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection therewith.
The Company, the Trustee and any agent of the Company or the Trustee may treat the Person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond is overdue, and neither the Company, the Trustee nor any such agent shall be affected by notice to the contrary.
Unless the certificate of authentication hereon has been executed by the Trustee or Authenticating Agent by manual signature, this Bond shall not be entitled to any benefit under the Indenture or be valid or obligatory for any purpose.
- 4 -
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
- 5 -
[Signature page for Yankee Gas Services Company, First Mortgage Bond, 6.90% Series J, Due 2018]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Bond to be duly executed under its corporate seal.
Dated: __________________
YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY
By_____________________________
Name:
Title:
Attest:
_________________________
This is one of the Bonds of the series designated therein referred to in the within-mentioned Indenture.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Trustee
By_______________________________
Authorized Officer
- 6 -
EXHIBIT B
FORM OF AMENDED AND RESTATED INDENTURE
Exhibit 10.2
Special Severance Program
for Officers
Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees
on January 13, 1998
Amended and Restated effective
January 1, 2009
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Special Severance Program for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies (the Program) is to provide certain executives with severance payments and benefits in the event of Termination Upon a Change of Control, as hereinafter defined. The Program is not intended to meet the qualification requirements of Section 401 of the Code or to be an employee pension benefit plan as defined in ERISA. The Program is not intended to affect eligibility for or payment of any other compensation or benefits in accordance with the terms of any applicable plans or programs of the Company.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
When used herein with initial capital letters, each of the following terms shall have the corresponding meaning set forth below unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context in which the term is used:
Administrator shall mean the Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of NUSCO.
Affiliate shall mean an affiliate as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
Base Compensation for any Participant shall mean the Participants annualized base rate of salary plus all short-term incentive compensation at the target level for the Participant specified under compensation programs established by the Company for its officers generally, received by the Participant in all capacities with the Company, as would be reported for federal income tax purposes on Form W-2, together with any and all salary reduction authorized amounts under any of the Companys benefit plans or programs, for the most recent full calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which occurs the Participants Termination Date or preceding the Change of Control, if higher. Base Compensation shall not include the value of any stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or restricted stock units granted to the Participant by the Company.
Board shall mean the Board of Trustees of Northeast Utilities.
Cause with respect to the Termination of Employment of a Participant shall mean (a) the Participants conviction of a felony, (b) in the reasonable determination of the Board, the Participants (i) commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement, or theft in connection with Participants duties in the course of the Participants employment with the Company, (ii) acts or omissions causing intentional, wrongful damage to the property of the Company or intentional and wrongful disclosure of Confidential Information, or (iii) engaging in gross misconduct or gross negligence in the course of the Participants employment with the Company, or (c) the Participants material breach of his or her obligations under any written agreement with the
- 1 -
Company if such breach shall not have been remedied within 30 days after receiving written notice from the Administrator specifying the details thereof. For purposes of this Program, an act or omission on the part of a Participant shall be deemed intentional only if it was not due primarily to an error in judgment or negligence and was done by the Participant not in good faith and without reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the best interest of the Company.
Change of Control shall mean the happening of any of the following:
(i)
Any person, as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than Northeast Utilities, its Affiliates, or any Company employee benefit plan (including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee), is or becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of Northeast Utilities representing more than 20% of the combined voting power of either (i) the Outstanding Common Shares or (ii) the Voting Securities; or
(ii)
Individuals who, as of the beginning of any twenty-four month period, constitute the trustees of NU (the Incumbent Board) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board or cease to be able to exercise the powers of the majority of the Board, provided that any individual becoming a trustee subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election or nomination for election by the common shareholders of Northeast Utilities was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the trustees then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the trustees of Northeast Utilities (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act); or
(iii)
Consummation by Northeast Utilities of a reorganization, merger or consolidation (a Business Combination), in each case, with respect to which all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the respective beneficial owners of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination do not, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such Business Combination, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation, business trust or other entity resulting from or being the surviving entity in such Business Combination in substantially the same proportion as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be; or
(iv)
Consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of Northeast Utilities or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Northeast Utilities other than to a corporation, business trust or other entity with respect to which, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such sale or disposition, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the
- 2 -
then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, is then owned beneficially, directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such sale or disposition in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be, immediately prior to such sale or disposition.
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Committee shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board, or any subsequent committee of the Board that has primary responsibility for compensation policies. In the absence of such a committee, Committee shall mean the Board or any committee of the Board designated by the Board to perform the functions of the Committee under the Program.
Company includes, individually and/or collectively as the context requires, Northeast Utilities, NUSCO, and all other entities that have approved and adopted this Program pursuant to Article VII, whether or not an individual such entity directly compensates the Participant or the Participant appears on the payroll of such entity.
Disability shall mean the mental or physical condition which qualifies a Participant for benefits under the Companys long term disability plan.
ERISA shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Flexible Benefits Plan shall mean the Northeast Utilities Service Company Flexible Benefits Plan, or any other successor health plan sponsored by the Northeast Utilities Service Company.
Notice of Termination shall mean a written notice given in accordance with Article VIII(f) that (a) indicates the specific termination provision in this Program relied upon, (b) briefly summarizes the facts and circumstances deemed to provide a basis for a Termination of Employment and the applicable provision hereof, and (c) if the Termination Date is other than the date of receipt of such notice, specifies the Termination Date (which date shall not be more than 15 days after the giving of such notice).
NUSCO shall mean Northeast Utilities Service Company, its successors and assigns.
Outstanding Common Shares at any time shall mean the then outstanding common shares of Northeast Utilities.
- 3 -
Participant at any time shall mean each person then holding the office of vice president or higher level of the Company, not including assistant officers, who (a) has signed a non-competition agreement with the Company in the form of Annex 1 hereto or in such form as has been approved by the Administrator for this purpose from time to time, and (b) is not a party to a then effective separate written agreement with the Company which has been adopted by the Board and expressly provides benefits following a change of control of Northeast Utilities (unless such agreement expressly provides for participation in this Program).
Termination Date with respect to any Participant shall mean the date of any action by the Company constituting a Termination Upon a Change of Control of such Participant.
Termination of Employment of a Participant shall mean the termination of the Participants actual employment relationship with the Company occasioned by the Companys action. Whether a Participant has had a Termination of Employment shall be determined by the Company on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances with reference to Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(h).
Termination Upon a Change of Control of a Participant shall mean a Termination of Employment during the period beginning on the earlier of (a) approval by the shareholders of Northeast Utilities of a Change of Control or (b) consummation of a Change of Control and, in either case, ending on the second anniversary of the earlier of (a) or (b) (or if such period started on shareholder approval and after such shareholder approval the Board abandoned the transaction, on the date the Board abandoned the transaction) either:
(i) initiated by the Company for any reason other than the Participants (A) Disability, (B) death, (C) retirement on or after attaining age 65, or (D) Cause, or
(ii) initiated by the Participant upon written notice to the Company provided within 90 days of the initial existence of any of the following circumstances unless such circumstances are corrected within 30 days after the Companys receipt of such notice (A) any significant reduction by the Company of the authority, duties or responsibilities of the Participant, (B) any material reduction of the Participant's compensation or benefits as in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, (C) the assignment to the Participant of duties which are materially inconsistent with the duties of the Participant's position with the Company or those of his or her supervisor, or (D) if the Participant is transferred, without the Participant's written consent, to a location that is more than 50 miles from the Participant's principal place of business immediately preceding the Change of Control.
Voting Securities at any time shall mean the then outstanding voting securities of Northeast Utilities entitled to vote generally in the election of trustees of Northeast Utilities.
- 4 -
ARTICLE III
BENEFITS
(a)
Benefits Following Termination Upon a Change of Control . Upon a Participants Termination Upon a Change of Control, provided that the Participant executes a written release substantially in the form of Annex 2 hereto and returns such executed release to the Company not fewer than eight days before the date provided in subsection (iv) below for payment of the amounts provided in subsection (i) below, the Participant shall be entitled to receive:
(i) A single cash payment in an amount equal to two times the Participants Base Compensation;
(ii) Each of the Participant, his or her eligible spouse and dependents shall be eligible for a continuation of all employee health plan benefits provided under the Flexible Benefits Plan in accordance with the continuation of coverage rules under Section 4980B of the Code (COBRA), which coverage shall be provided on a subsidized basis for so long as such COBRA coverage continues so that the Participants cost for such COBRA coverage will not be greater than the cost charged to an active employee of the Company for comparable non-COBRA coverage. To the extent that such Company subsidy exceeds any COBRA subsidy that the Company provides to employees generally under the Flexible Benefits Plan, such subsidized COBRA coverage will be includible in the Participants income for tax purposes, but the Company will provide tax gross-up payments with respect to such taxable COBRA coverage concurrently with the inclusion of such taxable COBRA coverage in the Participants income such that the tax gross-up payments will reimburse the Participant for all Federal and state income taxes at the highest marginal rate and reimbursement for the Hospital Insurance portion of FICA tax withholding resulting from the inclusion in the Participants income of such taxable COBRA coverage and from the reimbursement of such taxes. Immediately following the exhaustion of such COBRA coverage and provided that the Participant has not become covered by other group health plan coverage or entitled to Medicare, within the meaning provided in Section 4980B(f)(2)(B)(iv) of the Code, the Participant, his or her eligible spouse and dependents will be eligible to participate in the Companys executive retiree health plan for a period of time equal to the positive difference between 24 months and the duration of the Participants COBRA coverage period, with such executive retiree health plan coverage to be provided on a subsidized basis so that the Participants net after-tax cost for such executive retiree health plan coverage will generally not be greater than the cost charged to an active employee of the Company for comparable coverage under the Flexible Benefits Plan. The Participants cost for such executive retiree health plan coverage shall be paid on an after-tax basis and the Company subsidy for such executive retiree health plan coverage shall be includible in the Participants income for tax purposes, but the Company will provide tax gross-up payments with respect to such taxable subsidized coverage concurrently with the inclusion of such taxable coverage in the Participants income such that the tax gross-up payments will reimburse the Participant for all Federal and state income taxes at the highest marginal rate and reimbursement for the Hospital Insurance portion of FICA tax withholding resulting from the inclusion in the Participants income of such Company subsidy and from the reimbursement of such taxes.
- 5 -
(iii) On such Participants Termination Upon a Change of Control all stock options, and restricted shares (the equity awards) and performance units previously granted to the Participant, to the extent not already vested prior to the Termination Date, shall be fully vested and, in the case of options, exercisable as if the Participant had remained actively employed by the Company, including with respect to options the right of exercise, where appropriate, within 36 months after the Termination Date; provided, however, that any such performance units shall be valued as if the Company had met all performance targets during the applicable performance period and, provided further, that notwithstanding such acceleration of vesting, the time of payment of such equity awards shall be governed by the terms of the applicable program documents operating under the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan.
(iv) Amounts payable under this Article III following a Participants Termination Upon a Change of Control will be paid on or before the 30th day following the Participants Termination Upon a Change of Control, determined in the sole discretion of the Company, except as otherwise provided in Article VIII(d) and in subsection (ii) above with respect to subsidized COBRA coverage and executive retiree health plan coverage (and the tax gross-up payments with respect thereto) and in subsection (iii) above with respect to the equity awards. Any reimbursements made or in-kind benefits provided under this Article III shall comply with the requirements set forth in Article VIII(d)(ii) and any tax gross-up payments provided under this Article III shall comply with the requirements set forth in Article VIII(d)(iii). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if calculation of the amounts payable by any payment date specified in this Article III is not administratively practicable due to events beyond the control of the Participant (or the Participants beneficiary or estate) and for reasons that are commercially reasonable, payment will be made as soon as administratively practicable in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
(b)
Certain Reduction of Payments .
(i)
Anything in this Program to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that it shall be determined that any payment or distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of a Participant, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Program or otherwise (the Payment), would constitute an excess parachute payment within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and that such Participant would receive a greater net amount if the Payment to the Participant were reduced to avoid the taxation of excess parachute payments under Section 4999 of the Code, the aggregate present value of amounts payable or distributable to or for the benefit of the Participant pursuant to this Program (such payments or distributions pursuant to this Program are hereinafter referred to as Program Payments) shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the Reduced Amount. The Reduced Amount shall be an amount expressed in present value which maximizes the aggregate present value of Program Payments without causing any Payment to be subject to the taxation under Section 4999 of the Code. For purposes of this Article III(b), present value shall be determined in accordance with Section 280G(d)(4) of the Code.
- 6 -
(ii)
All determinations to be made under this Article 3(b) shall be made by the Companys independent public accountant immediately prior to the Change of Control (the Accounting Firm), which firm shall provide its determinations and any supporting calculations both to the Company and the affected Participant within 10 days of the Termination Date of such Participant. Any such determination by the Accounting Firm shall be binding upon the Company and the Participant. The Program Payments under Article III shall be reduced in the following order to eliminate the excess parachute payments to the Reduced Amount: (A) restricted share units, (B) performance cash, (C) severance provided under this Program, and (D) all other payments to the Participant.
(iii)
As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Section 280G of the Code at the time of the initial determination by the Accounting Firm hereunder, it is possible that Program Payments will have been made by the Company which should not have been made (Overpayment) or that additional Program Payments which have not been made by the Company could have been made (Underpayment), in each case, consistent with the calculations required to be made hereunder. In the first year in which it is administratively practicable for the Accounting Firm to review the determination it made pursuant to Article III (b)(ii), which shall not be more than two years following the Termination of Employment of any Participant, the Accounting Firm shall review such determination. In the event that the Accounting Firm determines that an Overpayment has been made, any such Overpayment shall be repaid to the Company by the Participant together with interest at the applicable Federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2) of the Code (the Federal Rate); provided, however, that no amount shall be payable by the Participant to the Company if and to the extent such payment would not increase the net amount which is payable to the Participant after taking into account the provisions of Section 4999 of the Code. In the event that the Accounting Firm determines that an Underpayment has occurred, any such Underpayment shall be paid by the Company to or for the benefit of the Participant together with interest at the Federal Rate in the first taxable year of the Participant in which calculation of the amount of the Underpayment is administratively practicable.
(iv)
All of the fees and expenses of the Accounting Firm in performing the determinations referred to in subsections (b)(ii) and (b)(iii) above shall be borne solely by the Company. The Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Accounting Firm of and from any and all claims, damages and expenses resulting from or relating to its determinations pursuant to subsections (b)(ii) and (b)(iii) above, except for claims, damages or expenses resulting from the gross negligence or wilful misconduct of the Accounting Firm.
(b)
Vesting . A Participant shall be vested and shall have a nonforfeitable right with respect to the benefits to be provided hereunder from and after the Termination Date. The respective rights and obligations of the Company and the Participant under this Program shall survive any termination of Participants employment to the extent necessary to the intended preservation of such rights and obligations.
(c)
Non-Exclusivity of Rights . Nothing in this Program shall prevent or limit any Participants continuing or future participation in or rights under any benefit, bonus, incentive or
- 7 -
other plan or program provided by the Company and for which such Participant may qualify; provided, however, that if such Participant becomes entitled to and receives all of the payments provided for in this Program, the Participant hereby waives his or her right to receive payments under any severance plan or similar program applicable to employees of the Company generally.
(d)
Notice of Termination . No Termination Upon a Change of Control shall be effective unless accompanied or preceded by a Notice of Termination.
ARTICLE IV
FUNDING
Benefits payable under this Program shall be unfunded, as that term is used in Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3), 401(a)(1) and 4021(a)(6) of ERISA, with respect to unfunded plans maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation to a select group of management or highly compensated employees, and the Administrator shall administer this Program in a manner that will ensure that benefits are unfunded and that Participants will not be considered to have received a taxable economic benefit prior to the time at which benefits are actually payable hereunder. Accordingly, the Company shall not be required to segregate or earmark any of its assets for the benefit of Participants or their spouses or other beneficiaries, and each such person shall have only a contractual right against the Company for benefits hereunder. The Company may from time to time establish a trust and deposit with the trustee thereof funds to be held in trust for the payment of benefits hereunder; provided, that the use of such funds for such purpose shall be subject to the claims of the Companys general creditors as set forth in the agreement establishing any such trust. The rights and interests of a Participant under this Program shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge or encumbrance by a Participant or any person claiming under or through a Participant, nor shall they be subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities or torts of a Participant or anyone else prior to payment. The Treasurer of NUSCO may from time to time appoint an investment manager or managers for the funds held in any such trust.
ARTICLE V
ADMINISTRATION
The Program shall be operated under the direction of the Committee and administered by the Administrator. The calculation of all benefits payable under the Program shall be performed by the Administrator, subject to the review of the Committee.
ARTICLE VI
CLAIMS PROCEDURE
All claims for benefits under this Program shall be determined under the claims procedure in effect under the Northeast Utilities Service Company Retirement Plan on the date that such claims are submitted, except that the Administrator shall make initial determinations with respect to claims hereunder and the Committee shall decide appeals of such determinations. In the event that any dispute under the provisions of this Program is not resolved to the satisfaction of the
- 8 -
affected Participant, other than a dispute in which the primary relief sought is an equitable remedy such as an injunction, the parties shall be required to have the dispute, controversy or claim settled by arbitration in the City of Hartford, Connecticut in accordance with National Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes then in effect of the American Arbitration Association, before a panel of three arbitrators, two of whom shall be selected by the Company and the affected Participant, respectively, and the third of whom shall be selected by the other two arbitrators. Any award entered by the arbitrators shall be final, binding and nonappealable (except as provided in Section 52-418 of the Connecticut General Statutes) and judgment may be entered thereon by either party in accordance with applicable law in any court of competent jurisdiction. This arbitration provision shall be specifically enforceable. The arbitrators shall have no authority to modify any provision of this Program or to award a remedy for a dispute involving this Program other than a benefit specifically provided under or by virtue of the Program. If a Participant prevails on any material issue which is the subject of any such arbitration or lawsuit, the Company shall be responsible for all of the fees of the American Arbitration Association and the arbitrators and any expenses relating to the conduct of the arbitration (including the Companys and the Participants reasonable attorneys fees and expenses). Any such payment or reimbursement shall be made in accordance with the reimbursement rules set forth in Article VIII(d)(ii). Otherwise, each party shall be responsible for its own expenses relating to the conduct of the arbitration (including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) and shall share the fees of the American Arbitration Association.
ARTICLE VII
ADOPTION BY COMPANY: OBLIGATIONS OF COMPANY
(a)
At the earliest feasible time or times, Northeast Utilities shall cause each entity in which it now or hereafter holds, directly or indirectly, more than a 50 percent voting interest to approve and adopt this Program and, by such approval and adoption, to be bound by the terms hereof.
(b)
Benefits under this Program shall, in the first instance, be paid and satisfied by NUSCO. If NUSCO shall be dissolved or for any other reason shall fail to pay and satisfy such benefits, each individual entity referred to in (a) above shall pay and satisfy its share of such benefits, such share to be the ratio of the Participants Base Compensation charged to such entity during the three calendar years immediately preceding the Participants Termination Upon a Change of Control to the total of the Participants Base Compensation charged to all such entities during the same period.
(c)
The Declaration of Trust of Northeast Utilities provides that no shareholder of Northeast Utilities shall be held to any liability whatever for the payment of any sum of money, or for damages or otherwise under any contract, obligation or undertaking made, entered into or issued by the trustees of Northeast Utilities or by any officer, agent or representative elected or appointed by the trustees and no such contract, obligation or undertaking shall be enforceable against the trustees or any of them in their or his individual capacities or capacity and all such contracts, obligations and undertakings shall be enforceable only against the trustees as such and every person, firm, association, trust and corporation having any claim or demand arising out of
- 9 -
any such contract, obligation or undertaking shall look only to the trust estate for the payment or satisfaction thereof. Any liability for benefits under this Program incurred by Northeast Utilities shall be subject to the foregoing provisions of this Article 7 (c).
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
(a)
Amendment or Termination . Prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Board or the Committee may amend or discontinue this Program at any time upon providing prior written notice to each Participant specifying the changes to be made. Any amendment will not be effective until at least two years following such notice, except in the case of an amendment that does not materially impact the timing or amount of benefit provided or is required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation. Upon and following a Change of Control, this Program may not be amended or terminated in any way that would eliminate or reduce the payments and benefits owing to Participants under the Program.
(b)
Headings . Headings are included in the Program for convenience only and are not substantive provisions of the Program.
(c)
Applicable Law . This Program shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Connecticut without giving effect to any conflict of laws provisions. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the terms of this Program shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and the Company shall have no right to make any payment under this Program except to the extent such action would not subject any Participant to the payment of any tax penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code. The Company shall have no obligation, however, to reimburse a Participant for any tax penalty or interest payable or provide a gross-up payment in connection with any tax liability of a Participant under Section 409A of the Code except that this provision shall not apply in the event of the Companys negligence or willful disregard in interpreting the application of Section 409A of the Code to the Program which negligence or willful disregard causes the Participant to become subject to a tax penalty or interest payable under Section 409A of the Code, in which case the Company will reimburse the Participant on an after-tax basis for any such tax penalty or interest not later than the last day of the Participants taxable year next following the Participants taxable year in which the Participant remits the applicable taxes and interest .
- 10 -
Compliance with Section 409A .
(i)
Delayed Payments Under Section 409A. Anything in this Program to the contrary notwithstanding, payments to be made under this Program upon a Participants Termination Date which are subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be delayed for six months following such Termination Date if such Participant is a Specified Employee as defined herein on the Termination Date. In the event of any such delay in the payment date, the Company will adjust the payment to reflect the deferred payment date by multiplying the payment by the product of the interest discount rate used for financial accounting purposes to compute the present value liability of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies for the plan year immediately preceding the date of the Specified Employees Termination Date multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days by which such payment was delayed and the denominator of which is 365. The Company will pay the adjusted payment at the beginning of the seventh month following the Participants Termination Date. In the event of the Participants death during such six-month period, payment will be made in the payroll period next following the payroll period in which the Participants death occurs. A Specified Employee shall mean a Vice President or more senior officer of the Company at any time during a calendar year in which case such employee shall be considered a Specified Employee for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the fourth month immediately following the end of such calendar year.
(ii)
Reimbursements and In-Kind Benefits Subject to Section 409A. Any reimbursements made or in-kind benefits provided under this Program shall be subject to the following limitations:
(A) the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement or in-kind benefits provided during any one taxable year of the Participant shall not affect the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement or in-kind benefits provided in any other taxable year;
(B) the reimbursement of any expense shall be made not later than the last day of the Participants taxable year following the Participants taxable year in which the expense is incurred;
(C) the right to reimbursement of an expense or in-kind benefits provided shall not be subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.
In addition, any reimbursements made or in-kind benefits provided under Article III(a)(ii) for COBRA continuation coverage shall be exempt from Section 409A of the Code and from the six-month delay in payment described in subsection (i).
(iii)
Tax Gross-Up Payments. Anything in this Program to the contrary notwithstanding, any tax gross-up payments provided under this Program shall be made no later than the end of the taxable year next following the taxable year in which the Participant remits the related taxes.
- 11 -
(iv)
Exemptions from Section 409A. The Participants right to payments under Article III(a)(ii) of this Program shall be treated at all times as a right to a series of separate payments under Section 1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii) of the Treasury Regulations. It is intended that: (A) all payments made under this Program on or before the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Participants taxable year in which the Participant terminates employment shall be exempt from compliance with Section 409A of the Code pursuant to the exception for short-term deferrals set forth in Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) of the Treasury Regulations (the Exempt Short-Term Deferral Payments); and (B) payments under this Program, in excess of the Exempt Short-Term Deferral Payments, that are made on or before the last day of the second taxable year of the Participant following the Participants taxable year in which the Participant terminates employment in an aggregate amount not exceeding two times the lesser of: (y) the sum of the Participants annualized compensation based on the Participants annual rate of pay for the Participants taxable year preceding the taxable year in which the Participant terminates employment (adjusted for any increase during that year that was expected to continue indefinitely if the Participant had not terminated employment); or (z) the maximum amount that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code for the year in which the Participant terminates employment shall be exempt from compliance with Section 409A of the Code pursuant to the exception for payments under a separation pay plan as set forth in Section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii) of the Treasury Regulations.
(e)
Mitigation . No Participant shall be required to mitigate the amount of any payment or benefit provided for in this Program by seeking other employment or otherwise and there shall be no offset against amounts due any Participant under this Program on account of any remuneration attributable to any subsequent employment that may be obtained.
(f)
Notices . All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Program or necessary or convenient in connection herewith shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail to the last known address of the Company or the Participant, as the case may be, reflected upon Company records. Notices to the Company shall be addressed to:
Northeast Utilities Service Company
P.O. Box 270
Hartford, CT 06141-0270
Attention: Vice President -Human Resources
(g)
Binding Effect; Successors and Assigns . All of the terms and provisions of this Program shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, except that the duties and responsibilities of the Participants under this Program are of a personal nature and shall not be assignable or delegatable in whole or in part by the Participants . The Company shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation, reorganization or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company, by agreement in form and substance satisfactory to the Participants, expressly to
- 12 -
assume and agree to perform this Program in the same manner and to the extent the Company would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place.
(h)
Severability . If any provision of this Program or application thereof to anyone or under any circumstances is adjudicated to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or application of this Program which can be given effect without the invalid or unenforceable provision or application and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision or application in any other jurisdiction. If any provision is held void, invalid or unenforceable with respect to particular circumstances, it shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect in all other circumstances.
(i)
Remedies Cumulative; No Waiver . No remedy conferred upon a party by this Program is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to any other remedy given under this Program or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. No delay or omission by a party in exercising any right, remedy or power under this Program or existing at law or in equity shall be construed as a waiver thereof, and any such right, remedy or power may be exercised by such party from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient or necessary by such party in its sole discretion.
(j)
Independent Benefit Entitlement . An amount paid to a Participant under the Plan will not be diminished because the Participant also is eligible for an award under the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan or any program operating thereunder.
(k)
Beneficiaries/References . Each Participant shall be entitled, to the extent permitted under any applicable law, to select and change a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any compensation or benefit payable under this Program following his or her death by giving the Company written notice thereof. In the event of a Participants death or a judicial determination of a Participants incompetence, reference in this Program to Participant shall be deemed, where appropriate, to refer to such Participants beneficiary, estate or other legal representative.
(l)
Withholding . The Company may withhold from any payments under this Program all federal, state and local taxes as the Company is required to withhold pursuant to any law or governmental rule or regulation. Each Participant shall bear all expense of, and be solely responsible for, all federal, state and local taxes due with respect to any payment received under this Program.
(m)
Establishment of Trust . The Company may establish an irrevocable trust fund pursuant to a trust agreement to hold assets to satisfy any of its obligations under this Program. Funding of such trust fund shall be subject to the Boards discretion, as set forth in the agreement pursuant to which the fund will be established.
- 13 -
Exhibit 10.3
Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan
Amended, Restated and Adopted by Northeast
Utilities Compensation Committee of the Board of
Trustees on February 13, 2007 as Approved by
Northeast Utilities Shareholders on May 8, 2007
Amended and Restated Effective
January 1, 2009
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is to provide (i) designated employees of the Company (as hereinafter defined in Article X) and (ii) non-employee members of the Board of Trustees (the "Board") of Northeast Utilities, a Massachusetts business trust, ("NU") with the opportunity to receive annual incentive compensation and grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and performance units. The Company believes that the Plan will assist it in recruiting talented employees who will contribute materially to the growth of the Company, thereby benefiting NU's shareholders and aligning the economic interests of the participants with those of the shareholders.
For purposes of the Plan, definitions appear in the Plan and as set forth in Article XIV.
ARTICLE II
ADMINISTRATION
1.
Committee . The Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Boards Compensation Committee, or the person or persons to which such committee delegates any of its functions under the Plan (the "Committee"). The Committee may consist of two or more persons appointed by the Board, all of whom shall be "outside directors" as defined under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and related Treasury regulations and "non-employee directors" as defined under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Members of the Committee shall be "independent" as defined under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. However, the Board may ratify or approve any grants as it deems appropriate or as are submitted by the Committee.
2.
Committee Authority . The Committee shall have the authority to amend or terminate the Plan as provided in Article XII. The Committee shall have the sole authority to ( a ) establish, and review the Companys and the Grantees, as defined below, performance against annual goals for purpose of the annual incentives to be distributed and determine the individuals to whom grants shall be made under the Plan, ( b ) determine the type, size and terms of the grants to be made to each such individual, ( c ) determine the time when the grants will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability ( d ) establish such rules and regulations or take such action as it deems necessary or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan, including the delegation of day-to-day plan administration, and ( e ) deal with any other matters arising under the Plan.
3.
Committee Determinations . The Committee shall have full power and authority to administer and interpret the Plan, to make factual determinations and to adopt or amend such rules, regulations, agreements and instruments for implementing the Plan and for the conduct of its business as it deems necessary or advisable, in its sole discretion. The Committee's interpretations of the Plan and all determinations made by the
- 1 -
Committee pursuant to the powers vested in it hereunder shall be conclusive and binding on all persons having any interest in the Plan or in any awards granted hereunder including, but not limited to, the Company, the Committee, the Board, the affected Participants, and their respective successors in interest. All powers of the Committee shall be executed in its sole discretion, in the best interest of the Company, not as a fiduciary, and in keeping with the objectives of the Plan and need not be uniform as to similarly situated individuals.
ARTICLE III
ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS
1.
Eligibility for Participation . Each employee of the Company classified as a Vice President or higher (an "Executive Employee") shall be eligible to receive an annual incentive award (an "Award") under the Plan
2.
Annual Awards .
(a)
As soon as practicable after the start of each fiscal year of NU, but in any event within 90 days, the Committee shall set the Performance Goals for the Company which shall be the basis for determining the Awards to be paid to each Executive Employee for such fiscal year and the Committee shall communicate the target and the percentages (including minimums and maximums) for each Executive Employee applicable to each level of achievement against the target set. In no event may an individual Award for an Executive Employee exceed $4,000,000.
(b)
The maximum amount of an Award for an Executive Employee shall be based upon the Companys performance compared against the Performance Goals set for that fiscal year. The actual amount of the Award for any Executive Employee shall be reduced, accordingly, by the Committee if the Executive Employee does not satisfy one or more individual financial or nonfinancial objectives set by the Committee for that Executive Employee as of the beginning of the relevant fiscal year. Any such objectives for an Executive Employee shall be set by the Committee and announced to the affected Executive Employee no later than 90 days after the commencement of the relevant fiscal year of NU.
(c)
The Committee shall certify and announce the Awards that will be paid by the Company to each Executive Employee as soon as practicable following the final determination of the Company's financial results for the relevant fiscal year. Payment of Awards that an Executive Employee has not expressly deferred pursuant to Section 3 below shall be made in cash, or in shares of Company Stock or Options, the value of which shall equal the amount to be distributed, all as determined by the Committee, after the end of the relevant fiscal year but not later than two and one-half months after the end of such fiscal year, provided that the Executive Employee has not separated from employment by the Company prior to the date that payment is due except as otherwise specifically provided in a contract between the Company and the Executive Employee. The Committee may provide for complete or partial exceptions to this requirement if an Executive Employees employment terminated on account of Retirement, termination without Cause, death, Disability or a Change of Control.
- 2 -
3.
Deferral of Annual Awards . The Committee may permit an Executive Employee to defer an Award in accordance with such procedures as the Committee may from time to time specify subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan.
ARTICLE IV
STOCK-BASED GRANTS
1.
Grants . Grants under the Plan may consist of grants of incentive stock options ("Incentive Stock Options") or nonqualified stock options ("Nonqualified Stock Options")(Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Stock Options are collectively referred to as "Options"), restricted stock ("Restricted Stock"), restricted share units (Restricted Share Units" or "RSUs"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), and/or performance units ("Performance Units") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grants"). Grants may be awarded singly, in combination or in tandem with other Grants. All Grants shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and to such other terms and conditions consistent with this Plan as the Committee deems appropriate and as are specified in writing by the Committee in program documents applicable to particular years and/or Grants and in individual grant instruments or amendments to the same (each a "Grant Instrument"). The Committee shall approve the form and provisions of each Grant Instrument. Grants under a particular Section of the Plan need not be uniform as among the Grantees, as defined below.
2.
Eligibility for Participation .
(a)
Eligible Persons . All employees of the Company ("Employees"), including Employees who are officers or members of the Board, contractors of the Company ("Contractors"), and members of the Board who are not Employees ("Non-Employee Trustees") shall be eligible to receive Grants under the Plan. Contractors shall be eligible to receive Grants only of Nonqualified Stock Options.
(b)
Selection of Grantees . The Committee shall select the Employees and Contractors to receive Grants and shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock subject to a particular Grant in such manner as the Committee determines. Employees, Contractors and Non-Employee Trustees who receive Grants under this Plan shall hereinafter be referred to as "Grantees".
(c)
Collective Bargaining Employees . Anything to the contrary in this Plan notwithstanding, no Employee whose terms and conditions of employment are subject to negotiation with a collective bargaining agent shall be eligible to receive Grants under this Plan until the agreement between the Company and such collective bargaining agent with respect to the Employee provides for participation in the Plan.
- 3 -
3.
Granting of Options .
(a)
Number of Shares . The Committee shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock that will be subject to each Grant of Options to Employees and Contractors subject to the overall limits of Article IX.
(b)
Type of Option and Price .
(i) The Committee may grant Incentive Stock Options that are intended to qualify as "incentive stock options" within the meaning of section 422 of the Code or Nonqualified Stock Options that are not intended so to qualify or any combination of Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Stock Options, all in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees. Nonqualified Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Contractors and Non-Employee Trustees.
(ii)
The purchase price (the "Exercise Price") of Company Stock subject to an Option shall be determined by the Committee and shall be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value (as defined below) of a share of Company Stock on the date the Option is granted; provided, however, that an Incentive Stock Option may not be granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company, unless the Exercise Price per share is not less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of Company Stock on the date of grant. The Committee may not modify the applicable Exercise Price after the date of Grant.
(iii)
If the Company Stock is publicly traded, then the Fair Market Value per share shall be the closing price of the Company Stock as reported in the Wall Street Journal as composite transactions for the relevant date (or the latest date for which such price was reported if such date is not a business day), or if not available, determined as follows: ( A ) if the principal trading market for the Company Stock is the New York Stock Exchange, the last reported sale price thereof on the relevant date or (if there were no trades on that date) the latest preceding date upon which a sale was reported, ( B ) if the principal trading market for the Company Stock is a national securities exchange other than the New York Stock Exchange or is the NASDAQ National Market, the last reported sale price thereof on the relevant date or (if there were no trades on that date) the latest preceding date upon which a sale was reported, or ( C ) if the Company Stock is not principally traded on such exchange or market, the mean between the last reported "bid" and "asked" prices of Company Stock on the relevant date, as reported on NASDAQ or, if not so reported, as reported by the National Daily Quotation Bureau, Inc. or as reported in a customary financial reporting service, as applicable and as the Committee determines. If the Company Stock is not publicly traded or, if publicly traded, is not subject to reported transactions or "bid" or "asked" quotations as set forth above, the Fair Market Value per share shall be as determined by the Committee in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B) of the Treasury Regulations .
- 4 -
(c)
Option Term . The Committee shall determine the term of each Option. The term of any Option shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. However, an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, or any parent or subsidiary of the Company, may not have a term that exceeds five years from the date of grant.
(d)
Exercisability of Options . Options shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions, consistent with the Plan, as may be determined by the Committee and specified in the Grant Instrument. The Committee may accelerate the exercisability of any or all outstanding Options at any time for any reason.
(e)
Termination of Employment, Retirement, Disability or Death .
(i)
Except as provided below, an Option may be exercised only while the Grantee is employed by, or providing service to, the Company as an Employee, a Contractor, or a member of the Board. In the event that a Grantee ceases to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company then, unless the Committee deems otherwise, all outstanding Options will expire upon termination from employment or service with the Board for Cause, or any other reason, including termination on account of "Retirement," "Disability," or death.
(ii)
For purposes of this Plan and programs thereunder:
(A)
"Cause" shall mean, except to the extent specified otherwise by the Committee acting on behalf of the Company, ( x ) the Grantees conviction of a felony, ( y ) in the reasonable determination of the Committee, the Grantees ( I ) commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement, or theft in connection with the Grantees duties in the course of the Grantees employment with the Company, ( II ) acts or omissions causing intentional, wrongful damage to the property of the Company or intentional and wrongful disclosure of confidential information of the Company, or ( III ) engaging in gross misconduct or gross negligence in the course of the Grantees employment with the Company, or ( z ) the Grantees material breach of his or her obligations under any written agreement with the Company if such breach shall not have been remedied within 30 days after receiving written notice from the Committee specifying the details thereof. For purposes of this Program, an act or omission on the part of a Grantee shall be deemed "intentional" only if it was not due primarily to an error in judgment or negligence and was done by Grantee not in good faith and without reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the best interest of the Company. In the event a Grantee's employment or service is terminated for cause, in addition to the immediate termination of all Grants, the Grantee shall automatically forfeit all shares underlying any exercised portion of an Option for which the Company has not yet delivered the share certificates, upon refund by the Company of the Exercise Price paid by the Grantee for such shares.
(B)
"Disability" shall mean a Grantee's being determined to be disabled within the meaning of the long-term disability plan or program that is a part of
- 5 -
the Northeast Utilities Service Company Flexible Benefits Plan (or any successor plan or program, hereafter, the "LTD Program") .
(C)
"Employed by, or provide service to, the Company" shall mean employment or service as an Employee, Contractor or member of the Board (so that, for purposes of exercising Options and SARs and satisfying conditions with respect to Restricted Stock, RSUs and Performance Units, a Grantee shall not be considered to have terminated employment or service until the Grantee ceases to be an Employee, Contractor and member of the Board), unless the Committee determines otherwise.
(D)
"Retired" shall mean a termination of employment from the Company, other than for "Cause" on or after the earlier to occur of (x) attainment of age 65, (y) eligibility for pension payments under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies, or employment-related agreement with the Company, or (z) attainment of age 55 after completing at least ten years of vesting service under the Northeast Utilities Service Company 401k Plan.
(f)
Exercise of Options . A Grantee may exercise an Option that has become exercisable, in whole or in part, by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company with payment of the Exercise Price. The Grantee shall pay the Exercise Price for an Option as specified by the Committee:
(i) in cash,
(ii) with the approval of the Committee, by delivering shares of Company Stock owned by the Grantee (including Company Stock acquired in connection with the exercise of an Option or Restricted Stock, as defined below, granted under this Plan, subject to such restrictions as the Committee deems appropriate including placing the same restrictions on the shares of Company Stock obtained through the exchange of the Restricted Stock) and having a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price, or
(iii) by such other method as the Committee may approve, including payment through a broker in accordance with procedures permitted by Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board. The Grantee shall pay the Exercise Price and the amount of any withholding tax due at the time of exercise.
(g)
Limits on Incentive Stock Options . Each Incentive Stock Option shall provide that, if the aggregate Fair Market Value of the stock on the date of the grant with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Grantee during any calendar year, under the Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company exceeds $100,000, then the option, as to the excess, shall be treated as a Nonqualified Stock Option. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to any person who is not an Employee of the Company.
- 6 -
ARTICLE V
STOCK-BASED GRANTS TO NON-EMPLOYEE TRUSTEES
1.
Eligibility for Participation . Non-Employee Trustees shall be eligible to receive Grants as set forth in Article IV; provided, that the number of shares of Company Stock subject to each Grant of Options, as well as the terms of all Grants, to Non-Employee Trustees shall be approved by the Board, in accordance with Article (9) of the Declaration of Trust of Northeast Utilities, as amended.
2.
Terms of Retirement . The words "age 65" in the definition of "Retired" in Section 3(e)(ii)(D) of Article IV shall be read as "age 70" with respect to Non-Employee Trustees.
ARTICLE VI
RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT GRANTS
1.
Restricted Stock Grants . Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee may issue or transfer shares of Company Stock to a Grantee with such restrictions as the Committee deems appropriate ("Restricted Stock"). The following provisions are applicable to Restricted Stock:
(a)
General Requirements . Shares of Company Stock issued or transferred pursuant to Restricted Stock Grants may be issued or transferred in exchange for services performed or to be performed. The Committee may establish conditions under which restrictions on shares of Restricted Stock shall lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Committee deems appropriate. The period of time during which the Restricted Stock will remain subject to restrictions (the "Restriction Period") will be designated in the Grant Instrument
(b)
Number of Shares . The Committee shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock to be issued or transferred pursuant to a Restricted Stock Grant and the restrictions applicable to such shares, subject to the limitations contained in Article IX.
(c)
Requirement of Employment or Service . If the Grantee ceases to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company during the Restriction Period, or if other specified conditions are not met, the Restricted Stock Grant shall terminate as to all shares covered by the Grant as to which the restrictions have not lapsed, and those shares of Company Stock must be immediately returned to the Company. The Committee may, however, provide for complete or partial exceptions to this requirement as it deems appropriate.
(d)
Restrictions on Transfer and Legend on Share Certificate . During the Restriction Period, a Grantee may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of Restricted Stock except to a Successor Grantee, as defined below. The Committee may determine that the Company will issue certificates for shares of Restricted Stock, in which case each certificate for a share of Restricted Stock shall contain a legend giving appropriate notice of the restrictions in the Grant. The Grantee shall be entitled to have the legend removed from the share certificate covering the shares
- 7 -
subject to restrictions when all restrictions on such shares have lapsed. The Committee may determine that the Company will not issue certificates for shares of Restricted Stock until all restrictions on such shares have lapsed, or that the Company will retain possession of certificates for shares of Restricted Stock until all restrictions on such shares have lapsed.
(e)
Right to Vote and to Receive Dividends . Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the Grantee shall have the right to vote Restricted Stock and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid on such shares during the Restriction Period subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee.
(f)
Lapse of Restrictions . All restrictions imposed on Restricted Stock shall lapse upon the expiration of the applicable Restriction Period and the satisfaction of all conditions imposed by the Committee. The Committee may determine, as to any or all Restricted Stock Grants, that the restrictions shall lapse without regard to any Restriction Period.
2.
Restricted Share Unit Grants .
(a)
Restriction Period . The Committee may make Grants of Restricted Share Units to Employees and Non-Employee Trustees representing the right to receive shares of Company Stock, cash, or both, as determined by the Committee (hereafter, "Restricted Share Units"). Between the end of the Restriction Period and the second payroll date following the end of the Restriction Period, subject to any deferral election that may be made or applied to the Grant pursuant to subsection (e) below and further subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan with respect to a Grant of Restricted Share Units that is subject to Section 409A of the Code , cash or shares or both shall be delivered to the Grantee (unless previously forfeited). Restricted Share Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the Restriction Period. A Grantee of Restricted Share Units shall have none of the rights of a holder of Company Stock unless and until shares of Company Stock are actually delivered in satisfaction of such Restricted Share Units.
(b)
Number of Units . The Committee shall determine the number of Restricted Share Units pursuant to a Restricted Share Unit Grant and the restrictions applicable to such shares, subject to the limitations contained in Article IX.
(c)
Requirement of Employment or Service . If the Grantee ceases to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company during a period designated in the Grant Instrument as the Restriction Period, or if other specified conditions are not met, the Restricted Share Unit Grant shall terminate as to all Restricted Share Units covered by the Grant as to which the restrictions have not lapsed. The Committee may, however, provide in the Grant Instrument for complete or partial exceptions to this requirement if an Employees employment or Non-Employee Trustees service with the Board ends on account of Retirement, termination without Cause, death or Disability or due to a Change of Control, as it deems appropriate subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan .
- 8 -
(d) Dividend Equivalents . The Committee may determine that a Grant Instrument with respect to Restricted Share Units may provide that the Grantee shall be entitled to receive as compensation from the Company dividend equivalents with respect thereto, in the form determined by the Committee from the effective date of the Grant Instrument through the earlier of (i) the date the Restricted Share Unit is forfeited, and (ii) the date Company Stock representing such Restricted Share Units or cash is delivered to the Grantee as provided herein.
(e)
Deferrals of Restricted Share Units . The Committee may provide in the Grant Instrument for the automatic deferral of the payment of Restricted Share Units upon the lapse of restrictions on the Grant or permit a Grantee to elect deferral by filing a written election with the Committee in accordance with such procedures as the Committee may from time to time specify , subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan .
3.
Withholding. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any settlement of a Grant of Restricted Shares or Restricted Share Units, including the delivery or vesting of shares or dividend equivalents, an amount sufficient to cover withholding required by law for any federal, state or local taxes or to take such other action as may be necessary to satisfy any withholding obligations. The Committee may permit shares to be used to satisfy required tax withholding, and such shares shall be valued at the fair market value as of the settlement date of the applicable Grant.
4.
Section 162(m) . Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or the terms of any Grant or Award issued hereunder, Grants of Restricted Stock or Restricted Share Units under this Article VI are not intended to be or meet the requirements for "qualified performance based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code or Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e).
ARTICLE VII
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
1.
Stock Appreciation Rights .
(a)
General Requirements . The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights ("SARs") to a Grantee separately or in tandem with any Option (for all or a portion of the applicable Option). Tandem SARs may be granted either at the time the Option is granted or at any time thereafter while the Option remains outstanding; provided, however, that, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, SARs may be granted only at the time of the Grant of the Incentive Stock Option. The Committee shall establish the base amount of the SAR at the time the SAR is granted. The base amount of each SAR shall be equal to the per share Exercise Price of the related Option or, if there is no related Option, the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock as of the date of Grant of the SAR ("Base Amount"). The Committee may not modify the applicable Base Amount of the SAR after the date of Grant.
- 9 -
(b)
Tandem SARs . In the case of tandem SARs, the number of SARs granted to a Grantee that shall be exercisable during a specified period shall not exceed the number of shares of Company Stock that the Grantee may purchase upon the exercise of the related Option during such period. Upon the exercise of an Option, the SARs relating to the Company Stock covered by such Option shall terminate. Upon the exercise of SARs, the related Option shall terminate to the extent of an equal number of shares of Company Stock.
(c)
Exercisability . An SAR shall be exercisable during the period specified by the Committee in the Grant Instrument and shall be subject to such vesting and other restrictions as may be specified in the Grant Instrument. SARs may only be exercised while the Grantee is employed by the Company or during the applicable period after termination of employment as described in Article IV, Section 3(e). A tandem SAR shall be exercisable only during the period when the Option to which it is related is also exercisable.
(d)
Value of SARs . When a Grantee exercises SARs, the Grantee shall receive in settlement of such SARs an amount equal to the "spread value" for the number of SARs exercised, payable in cash.. The "spread value" for an SAR is the amount representing the difference by which the Fair Market Value of the underlying Company Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR exceeds the base amount of the SAR as described in Subsection (a).
(e)
Form of Payment . For purposes of calculating the amount of cash to be received, shares of Company Stock shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR and cash shall be distributed, net of applicable withholding taxes.
ARTICLE VIII
PERFORMANCE UNITS
1.
Performance Units .
(a)
General Requirements . The Committee may grant performance units ("Performance Units") to an Employee. Each Performance Unit shall represent the right of the Grantee to receive an amount based on the value of the Performance Unit, if performance goals established by the Committee are met. A Performance Unit shall be based on the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock or on such other measurement base as the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee shall determine the number of Performance Units to be granted and the requirements applicable to such Units, subject to the limitations contained in Article IX.
(b)
Performance Period and Performance Goals . When Performance Units are granted, the Committee shall establish the Performance Period during which performance shall be measured, Performance Goals applicable to the Units and such other conditions of the Grant as the Committee deems appropriate. Performance Goals may relate to the financial performance of the Company or its operating units, the performance of Company Stock, individual performance, or such other criteria as the Committee deems appropriate.
- 10 -
(c)
Payment with respect to Performance Units . At the end of each Performance Period, the Committee shall determine to what extent the Performance Goals and other conditions of the Performance Units are met and the amount, if any, to be paid with respect to the Performance Units. Payments with respect to Performance Units shall be made in cash, in Company Stock, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee after the end of the relevant Performance Period but not later than two and one-half months after the end of such Performance Period subject to any deferral election that may be made or applied to the Grant pursuant to subsection (e) below and further subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan with respect to a Grant of Performance Units that is subject to Section 409A of the Code.
(d)
Requirement of Employment or Service . If the Grantee ceases to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company (as defined in Article IV, Section 3(e)) during a Performance Period, or if other conditions established by the Committee are not met, the Grantee's Performance Units shall be forfeited. The Committee may, however, provide in the Grant Instrument for complete or partial exceptions to this requirement if an Employees employment ends on account of Retirement, termination without Cause, death or Disability or due to a Change of Control, as it deems appropriate subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan . .
Deferrals of Performance Units. The Committee may provide in the Grant Instrument for the automatic deferral of the payment of Performance Units at the end of the Performance Period or permit a Grantee to elect deferral by filing a written election with the Committee in accordance with such procedures as the Committee may from time to time specify subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan.
Designation as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation . The Committee may determine that Performance Units granted to a Grantee shall be considered "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code. The provisions of this subsection (e) shall apply to Grants of Performance Units that are to be considered "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code.
(i)
Performance Goals . When Performance Units that are to be considered "qualified performance-based compensation" are Granted, the Committee shall establish in writing ( A ) the objective Performance Goals that must be met in order for amounts to be paid under the Performance Units, ( B ) the Performance Period during which the performance goals must be met, ( C ) the threshold, target and maximum amounts that may be paid if the Performance Goals are met, and ( D ) any other conditions, including without limitation provisions relating to death, disability, other termination of employment or Change of Control, that the Committee deems appropriate and consistent with the Plan and Section 162(m) of the Code. The performance goals may relate to the Employees business unit or the performance of the Company and its subsidiaries as a whole, or any combination of the foregoing.
(ii)
Establishment of Goals . The Committee shall establish the Performance Goals in writing either before the beginning of the Performance Period or
- 11 -
during a period ending no later than the earlier of (A) 90 days after the beginning of the Performance Period or (B) the date on which 25% of the Performance Period has been completed, or such other date as may be required or permitted under applicable regulations under Section 162(m) of the Code. The performance goals shall satisfy the requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation," including the requirement that the achievement of the goals be substantially uncertain at the time they are established and that the goals be established in such a way that a third party with knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether and to what extent the performance goals have been met. The Committee shall not have discretion to increase the amount of compensation that is payable upon achievement of the designated performance goals.
(iii)
Maximum Payment . The number of Performance Units granted and paid in shares shall not exceed the limit specified under Article IX(1)(a). If Performance Units are paid in cash, the maximum amount that may be paid to an Employee with respect to a Performance Period is $4,000,000.
(iv)
Announcement of Grants . The Committee shall certify and announce the results for each Performance Period to all Grantees immediately following the announcement of the Companys financial results for the Performance Period. If and to the extent that the Committee does not so certify that the performance goals have been met, the grants of Performance Units for the Performance Period shall be forfeited.
ARTICLE IX
AUTHORIZED SHARES
1.
Shares Subject to the Plan .
(a)
Shares Reserved for Grants and Awards . The aggregate number of common shares of NU, par value $5.00, ("Company Stock") that may be subject to Grants of Options, or transferred on account of other Grants or Awards under the Plan may not exceed 4.5 million shares. The shares may be authorized but unissued shares of Company Stock or reacquired shares of Company Stock, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan. If and to the extent (i) Options or SARs granted under the Plan terminate, expire, or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised (other than for reasons of the Exercise Price of the Option being less than the current Fair Market Value thereof), or (ii) any shares of Restricted Stock, RSUs or Performance Units are forfeited, or (iii) Company Stock, including RSUs, are used by the Participant to pay withholding taxes or as payment for the Exercise Price of the Grant, then the shares not made the subject of Grants and Awards, and the shares subject to such terminated, expired, canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered Grants and Awards shall again be available for purposes of the Plan in addition to the number of shares of Company Stock otherwise available for Grants and Awards. No Participant under the Plan may receive aggregate Grants and Awards in excess of one million shares over the term of the Plan.
(b)
Adjustments . If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of Company Stock outstanding (i) by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization,
- 12 -
stock split, or combination or exchange of shares, (ii) by reason of a merger, reorganization or consolidation in which NU is the surviving entity, (iii) by reason of a reclassification or change in par value, or (iv) by reason of any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding Company Stock as a class without NU's receipt of consideration, or (v) otherwise in the event of an equity restructuring within the meaning of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), other than (A) any distribution of securities or other property by the Company to shareholders in a spin-off or split-off that does not qualify as a tax-free spin-off or split-up under Section 355 of the Code (or any successor provision of the Code) or (B) any cash dividend (other than an extraordinary cash dividend or distribution), then the maximum number of shares of Company Stock available for Grants, the number of shares covered by outstanding Grants, the kind of shares issued under the Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such Grants, including the per share exercise price of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of, or change in the kind or value of, issued shares of Company Stock to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under such Grants; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment shall be eliminated and, provided further, that any substitution of a new stock right or assumption of an outstanding stock right pursuant to a corporate transaction shall comply with the requirements of Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(D) of the Treasury Regulations and any adjustment of a stock right to reflect a stock split or stock dividend shall comply with the requirements of Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(H) of the Treasury Regulations . Any increase to the number or kind of shares of Company Stock outstanding under this Article IX(1)(b) occurring on or after May 9, 2007 shall result in the adjustment in the 4.5 million shares authorized under Article IX(1)(a). No such adjustment shall be required to reflect the events described in clauses (x) and (y) above, or any other change in capitalization that does not constitute an equity restructuring; however, such adjustment may be made if the Committee determines that such adjustment is appropriate ; provided, however, that any such adjustment shall comply with the requirements of Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v) of the Treasury Regulations . Any adjustments determined by the Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive.
(c)
Minimum Vesting Requirement . Grants of Restricted Stock or RSUs made pursuant to the Plan shall vest ratably no sooner than the first business day of each of the three years following the calendar year of the Grant. Grants of Options shall vest no sooner than the first business day of the year following the calendar year of the Grant. The Committee may, in its discretion, determine such other vesting schedule as it deems appropriate, except that any such other vesting schedule must fulfill at least the applicable minimum requirements set forth in the prior two sentences. The Committee may provide in the Grant Instrument for complete or partial exceptions to these requirements as it deems appropriate in the case of a Participant whose service with the Company ends for reason of Retirement, Death, or Disability, or in the case of a Grant to a Non-Employee Trustee or a newly-hired Employee, or upon a Change of Control of NU subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan .
ARTICLE X
OPERATING RULES
- 13 -
1.
Withholding of Taxes . All Grants under the Plan shall be subject to applicable federal (including FICA), state and local tax withholding requirements. The Company shall have the right to deduct from all Grants paid in cash, or from other wages paid to the Grantee, any federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such Grants. In the case of Options and other Grants paid in Company Stock, the Company may require the Grantee or other person receiving such shares to pay to the Company the amount of any such taxes that the Company is required to withhold with respect to such Grants, or the Company may deduct from other wages paid by the Company the amount of any withholding taxes due with respect to such Grants. If the Committee so permits, a Grantee may elect to satisfy the Company's income tax withholding obligation with respect to an Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Restricted Share Units or Performance Units that are paid in Company Stock, by having shares withheld up to an amount that does not exceed the Grantee's minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal (including FICA), state and local tax liabilities. The election must be in a form and manner prescribed by the Committee.
2.
Transferability of Grants .
(a)
Nontransferability of Grants . Except as provided below, only the Grantee may exercise rights under a Grant during the Grantees lifetime. A Grantee may not transfer those rights except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or, with respect to Grants other than Incentive Stock Options, if permitted in any specific case by the Committee, pursuant to a domestic relations order (as defined under the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the regulations thereunder). When a Grantee dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Grantee ("Successor Grantee") may exercise such rights. A Successor Grantee must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Grant under the Grantee's will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.
(b)
Transfer of Nonqualified Stock Options . Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may provide, in a Grant Instrument, that a Grantee may transfer Nonqualified Stock Options to family members, one or more trusts for the benefit of family members, or one or more partnerships of which family members are the only partners, according to such terms as the Committee may determine; provided that the Grantee receives no consideration for the transfer of an Option and the transferred Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the Option immediately before the transfer.
3.
Requirements for Issuance or Transfer of Shares . No Company Stock shall be issued or transferred in connection with any Grant hereunder unless and until all legal requirements applicable to the issuance or transfer of such Company Stock have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee shall have the right to condition any Grant made to any Grantee hereunder on such Grantee's undertaking in writing to comply with such restrictions on his or her subsequent disposition of such shares of Company Stock as the Committee shall deem necessary or advisable as a result of any applicable law, regulation or official interpretation thereof, and certificates
- 14 -
representing such shares may be legended to reflect any such restrictions. Certificates representing shares of Company Stock issued or transferred under the Plan will be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as may be required by applicable laws, regulations and interpretations, including any requirement that a legend be placed thereon.
4.
Funding of the Plan . This Plan shall be unfunded. The Company shall not be required to establish any special or separate fund or to make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any Grants under this Plan. In no event shall interest be paid or accrued on any Grant, including unpaid installments of Grants.
5.
Rights of Participants . Nothing in this Plan shall entitle any Employee or Non-Employee Trustee or other person to any claim or right to be granted a Grant under this Plan except as provided in Article V. Neither this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any individual any rights to be retained by or in the employ of the Company or any other employment rights, nor shall they interfere in any way with the right of the Company, a subsidiary or an affiliate to terminate the employment of any Employee at any time.
Headings . Section headings are for reference only. In the event of a conflict between a title and the content of a Section, the content of the Section shall control.
7.
Effective Date of the Plan
. Subject to approval by NU's shareholders, if required, the Plan as amended and restated, is effective
on January 1, 2009.
8.
Definition of Company . "Company" means NU and any Affiliate which is authorized by the Board to adopt the Plan and cover its eligible employees and whose designation as such has become effective upon acceptance of such status by the board of directors of the Affiliate. An Affiliate may revoke its acceptance of such designation at any time, but until such acceptance has been revoked, all the provisions of the Plan, including the authority of the Board and the Committee, and amendments thereto shall apply to the eligible employees of the Affiliate. In the event the designation is revoked by the board of directors of an Affiliate, the Plan shall be deemed terminated only with respect to such Affiliate. For the purposes hereof, "Affiliate" means each direct and indirect affiliated company that directly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with NU.
ARTICLE XI
CHANGE OF CONTROL OF NU
1.
Change of Control of NU .
As used herein, a "Change of Control" shall mean a change in ownership or control effected through any one or more of the following :
(a)
When any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), other than the Company, its
- 15 -
affiliates, or any Company or NU employee benefit plan (including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee), is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of NU representing more than 20% of the combined voting power of either (i) the then outstanding common shares of NU (the "Outstanding Common Shares") or (ii) the then outstanding voting securities of NU entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the "Voting Securities"); or
(b)
Individuals who, as of the beginning of any twenty-four month period, constitute the Trustees (the "Incumbent Trustees") cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Trustees or cease to be able to exercise the powers of the majority of the Trustees, provided that any individual becoming a trustee subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election or nomination for election by the Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the trustees then comprising the Incumbent Trustees shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Trustees, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the Trustees of NU (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act); or
(c)
Consummation by NU of a reorganization, merger or consolidation (a "Business Combination"), in each case, with respect to which all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the respective beneficial owners of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination do not, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such Business Combination, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation, business trust or other entity resulting from or being the surviving entity in such Business Combination in substantially the same proportion as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be; or
(d)
Consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of NU or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of NU other than to a corporation, business trust or other entity with respect to which, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such sale or disposition, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, is then owned beneficially, directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such sale or disposition in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be, immediately prior to such sale or disposition.
- 16 -
2.
Consequences of a Change of Control .
(a)
Notice . Upon a Change of Control, the Company shall provide each Grantee with outstanding Grants written notice of such Change of Control.
(b)
Assumption of Grants . Upon a Change of Control where the Company is not the surviving corporation (or survives only as a subsidiary of another corporation), unless the Committee determines otherwise, all outstanding Options and SARs that are not exercised and all outstanding restricted shares, restricted share units and Performance Units that are denominated in shares of Company Stock shall be assumed by, or replaced with comparable options, rights or entitlements by, the surviving corporation , subject to compliance with Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v) of the Treasury Regulations .
(c)
Other Alternatives . Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to subsection (d) below and compliance with Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v) of the Treasury Regulations , in the event of a Change of Control, the Committee may provide in annual program documents that, notwithstanding any deferral election or deferral provision, take any of the following actions: (i) eliminate all risk of forfeiture remaining on any Options, SARs, restricted shares, restricted share units and Performance Units outstanding at the time of a Change of Control; (ii) require that Grantees surrender their outstanding Options, SARs, restricted shares, restricted share units and Performance Units that are denominated in shares of Company Stock in exchange for a payment by the Company, in cash or Company Stock as determined by the Committee, in an amount equal to the restricted shares, restricted share units or Performance Units (based on the then Fair Market Value of shares of Company Stock) (except that a distribution of any award that is a 409A Award may only be made, other than on Termination, upon a change of control that qualifies as a "change in control" under Section 1.409A -3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations), or with respect to unexercised Options or SARs, in the amount by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Company Stock subject to the Grantee's unexercised Options and SARs exceeds the Exercise Price of the Options or the base amount of the SARs, as applicable, or (iii) after giving Grantees an opportunity to exercise their outstanding Options and SARs, terminate any or all unexercised Options and SARs at such time as the Committee deems appropriate. Such surrender or termination shall take place as of the date of the Change of Control or such other date as the Committee may specify.
(d)
Committee . The Committee making the determinations under this Article XI, Section 2(d) following a Change of Control must comprise the same members as those on the Committee immediately before the Change of Control. If the Committee members do not meet this requirement, the automatic provisions of Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply, and the Committee shall not have discretion to vary them.
(e)
Limitations . Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, in the event of a Change of Control, the Committee shall not have the right to take any actions described in the Plan (including without limitation actions described in Subsection (c) above) that would make the Change of Control ineligible for pooling of interests accounting treatment or that would make the Change of Control ineligible for desired tax
- 17 -
treatment if, in the absence of such right, the Change of Control would qualify for such treatment and the Company intends to use such treatment with respect to the Change of Control.
ARTICLE XII
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
1.
Amendment and Termination of the Plan .
Amendment . Subject to the limitations set forth in Section 3 of Article XIII of this Plan, the Board or the Committee may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that neither the Board nor the Committee shall amend the Plan without shareholder approval if such approval is required by Sections 162(m) or 422 of the Code.
Termination of the Plan . The Plan shall terminate on the day preceding the tenth anniversary of its effective date, unless the Plan is terminated earlier by the Board or the Committee in accordance with Subsection (a) above , or is extended by the Board or the Committee with the approval of the shareholders.
Termination and Amendment of Outstanding Grants . A termination or amendment of the Plan that occurs after a Grant is made shall not materially impair the rights of a Grantee unless the Grantee consents, unless the Committee acts under Article XI, Section 2(c), or unless the amendment or termination is required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation or unless such an amendment is necessary to bring a Grant into compliance with, or obtain an exemption from, the requirements of Section 409A of the Code . The termination of the Plan shall not impair the power and authority of the Committee with respect to an outstanding Grant.
Governing Document . The Plan shall be the controlling document. No other statements, representations, explanatory materials or examples, oral or written, may amend the Plan in any manner. The Plan shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Company and its successors and assigns.
ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS
1.
Grants in Connection with Corporate Transactions and Otherwise . Nothing contained in this Plan shall be construed to ( a ) limit the right of the Committee to make Grants under this Plan in connection with the acquisition, by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation or otherwise, of the business or assets of any corporation, firm or association, including Grants to employees thereof who become Employees of the Company, or for other proper corporate purposes, or ( b ) limit the right of the Company to grant stock options or make other awards outside of this Plan. Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee may make a Grant to an employee of another corporation who becomes an Employee by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or property, reorganization or liquidation involving the Company or any of its
- 18 -
subsidiaries in substitution for a stock option or restricted stock grant made by such corporation. The terms and conditions of the substitute grants may vary from the terms and conditions required by the Plan and from those of the substituted stock incentives. The Committee shall prescribe the provisions of the substitute grants.
2.
Compliance with Law
. The Plan, the exercise of Options and SARs and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Company Stock under Grants shall be subject to all applicable laws and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. With respect to persons subject to section 16 of the Exchange Act, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all transactions under the Plan comply with all applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. In addition, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and applicable Grants under the Plan comply with the applicable provisions of sections 162(m) and 422 of the Code, and any other applicable law or regulation having the effect of law. To the extent that any legal requirement of section 16 of the Exchange Act or section 162(m) or 422 of the Code as set forth in the Plan ceases to be required under section 16 of the Exchange Act or section 162(m) or 422 of the Code, that Plan provision shall cease to apply.
Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the terms of this Plan shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and the Company shall have no right to make any payment under this Plan except to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code. It is intended that payments made under this Plan on or before the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Participants first taxable year in which the right to the payment is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture shall be exempt from compliance with Section 409A of the Code pursuant to the exception for short-term deferrals set forth in Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) of the Treasury Regulations
.
The Company shall have no obligation, however, to reimburse a Participant for any tax penalty or interest payable or provide a gross-up payment in connection with any tax liability of a Participant under Section 409A of the Code except that this provision shall not apply in the event of the Companys negligence or willful disregard in interpreting the application of Section 409A of the Code to the Plan which negligence or willful disregard causes the Participant to become subject to a tax penalty or interest payable under Section 409A of the Code, in which case the Company will reimburse the Participant on an after-tax basis for any such tax penalty or interest not later than the last day of the Participants taxable year next following the Participants taxable year in which the Participant remits the applicable taxes and interest. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the
Committee may revoke any Grant if it is contrary to law or modify a Grant to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation. The Committee may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payments to Grantees. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, agree to limit its authority under this Section.
3.
Deferred Compensation .
(a) 409A Awards. Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the following rules shall apply to 409A Awards and shall constitute further restrictions on terms of Awards and Grants set forth elsewhere in this Plan:
- 19 -
(i)
The Committee may permit a Participant to elect to defer a Grant or Award, or any payment under a Grant or Award, in 2005 or thereafter, only if such election is either made before the beginning of the fiscal year for which the Grant or Award is granted or complies with an exception set forth in the Treasury Regulations under Section 409A of the Code or the transition rules set forth in Q&A 19(c) of IRS Notice 2005-1 as extended by the Treasury Regulations and IRS Notices 2006-79 and 2007-86 (collectively, the "Transition Rules").
(ii)
The Committee may, in its discretion, for the period beginning January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008, require or permit on an elective basis (one or more times) a change in the distribution terms applicable to 409A Awards (and Non-409A Awards that qualify for the short-term deferral exemption under Section 409A) in accordance with, and to the fullest extent permitted by, the Transition Rules.
(iii) The Committee shall have no authority to accelerate distributions relating to 409A Awards in excess of the authority permitted under Section 1.409A-3(j) of the Treasury Regulations.
(iv) Any distribution of a 409A Award triggered by a Participants termination of employment and intended to qualify under Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Code shall be made only at the time that the Participant has had a Termination (or at such earlier time, after a termination of employment, that there occurs another event triggering a distribution under the Plan or the applicable Grant Instrument in compliance with Section 409A).
(v) Any distribution of a 409A Award triggered by a Participants Termination shall be delayed for six months following the date of such Termination if such Participant is a Specified Employee on such date. In the event of any such delay in the distribution date, the 409A Award will be paid at the beginning of the seventh month following the Participants Termination. In the event of the Participants death during such six-month period, payment will be made in the payroll period next following the payroll period in which the Participants death occurs.
Any payment due within such six-month period will be adjusted to reflect the deferred payment date by multiplying the payment by the product of the interest discount rate used for financial accounting purposes to compute the present value liability of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies for the plan year immediately preceding the date of the Specified Employees Termination, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days by which such payment was delayed and the denominator of which is 365.
(vi) In the case of any distribution of a 409A Award, if the timing of such distribution is not otherwise specified in the Plan or a Grant Instrument, the distribution shall be made on or after the date at which the settlement of the Award is specified to occur and on or before the 75th day following the date at which the settlement of the Award is specified to occur, determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, except as otherwise provided in Subsection (v) above.
- 20 -
(vii) No amendment or termination of the Plan or a Grant pursuant to Article XII shall be effective with respect to 409A Awards except insofar as it complies with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder or the Transition Rules, including without limitation, the requirements set forth in Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-2(b) governing subsequent changes in time and form of payment and Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix) governing plan terminations.
(b)
Grandfathered Grants. Any Grant that was both granted and vested before 2005 and which otherwise might constitute a deferral of compensation under Section 409A is intended to be "grandfathered" under Section 409A. No amendment or change to the Plan or other change (including an exercise of discretion) with respect to such a grandfathered Grant after October 3, 2004, shall be effective if such change would constitute a "material modification" within the meaning of the Treasury Regulations under Section 409A, except in the case of a Grant that is specifically modified to become compliant as a 409A Award or compliant with an exemption under Section 409A.
(c)
Distributions Upon Vesting. In the case of any Grant providing for a distribution upon the lapse of a risk of forfeiture, if the timing of such distribution is not otherwise specified in the Plan or a Grant Instrument, the distribution shall be made on or after January 1 and on or before March 15 of the year following the year in which the risk of forfeiture lapsed.
(d)
Scope and Application of this Provision. For purposes of this Section 3 and Section 2 above, references to a term or event (including any authority or right of the Company or a Participant) being "permitted" under or in "compliance" with Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations thereunder or the Transition Rules mean that the term or event will not cause the Participant to be deemed to be in constructive receipt of compensation relating to the 409A Award prior to the distribution of cash, shares or other property or to be liable for payment of interest or a tax penalty under Section 409A.
Clawback . Upon written demand of the Company, an Employee will reimburse or forfeit all or a portion of any Award or Grant paid to the Employee under the Plan where: ( a ) payment of the Award or Grant was predicated on the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of the financial statements of the Company, ( b ) in the judgment of the Board the Employee engaged in fraud or misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the substantial restatement, and ( c ) a lower payment would have been made to the Employee based on the restated financial results. In the event the Employee fails to make prompt reimbursement of any such Award or Grant previously paid or delivered, the Company may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, deduct the amount required to be reimbursed from the Grantees compensation otherwise due from the Company; provided, however, that the Company will not seek to recover upon Awards or Grants paid more than three years prior to the date the applicable restatement is disclosed.
5.
Governing Law . The validity, construction, interpretation and effect of the Plan and Grant Instruments issued under the Plan shall exclusively be governed by and determined in accordance with the law of the State of Connecticut.
- 21 -
6.
Disclaimer of Liability . The Declaration of Trust of NU provides that no shareholder of NU shall be held to any liability whatever for the payment of any sum of money, or for damages or otherwise under any contract, obligation or undertaking made, entered into or issued by the Board or by any officer, agent or representative elected or appointed by the Board, and no such contract, obligation or undertaking shall be enforceable against the Board or any of them in their or his or her individual capacities or capacity and all such contracts, obligations and undertakings shall be enforceable only against the Board as such, and every person or entity, having any claim or demand arising out of any such contract, obligation or undertaking shall look only to the trust estate for the payment or satisfaction thereof.
ARTICLE XIV
DEFINITIONS
When used herein, each of the following terms shall have the corresponding meaning set forth below unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context in which a term is used:
14.1
" Award " is an annual incentive award made to an Employee as provided in Article III.
14.2
" Cause " is described in Article IV(3)(e)(ii)(A).
14.3
" Change of Control " is described in Article XI(1).
14.4
" Code " is the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto.
14.5
" Committee " is described in Article II(1).
14.6
" Company Stock " or " Stock " is Northeast Utilities common shares, as described in Article IX(1)(a).
14.7
" Company " or " NU " is described in Article X.
14.8
" Disability " is described in Article IV(3)(e)(ii)(B).
14.9
" Exchange Act " is the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto.
- 22 -
14.10
" Exercise Price " is described in Article IV(3)(b)(ii).
14.11
" 409A Award " is an Award or Grant that constitutes a deferral of compensation subject to Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. "Non-409A Award" is an Award or Grant other than a 409A Award (including Awards and Grants exempt under the short-term deferral exception set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) and Awards and Grants that vested before 2005 and therefore are "grandfathered" under Section 409A). Although the Committee retains authority under the Plan to grant Options and Stock Appreciation Rights on terms that will cause those Grants to be 409A Awards, Options and Stock Appreciation Rights are intended to be Non-409A Awards unless otherwise expressly specified by the Committee.
"Fair Market Value" is, as of any given date, the value of Company Stock, as provided in Article IV(3)(b)(iii), or as otherwise determined by the Committee.
14.13
" Grant " is described in Article IV(1).
" Grantee " is the individual to whom a Grant is made, as provided in Article IV, Section 2(b).
14.15
" Grant Instrument " is described in Article IV(1).
14.16
" Stock Option " is described in Article IV(3)(b).
"
Nonqualified Stock Option
"
is described in Article IV(3)(b).
" Option " is an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option, as described in Article IV(3)(b).
" Participant " is any eligible individual to whom an Award or Grant is made.
14.20
" Performance Goals " means the objectives for the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate or any unit thereof or any individual that may be established by the Committee for a Performance Period with respect to any performance-based Awards or Grants contingently awarded under the Plan. The Performance Goals for Awards or Grants that are intended to constitute "performance-based" compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) (or any amended or successor provision) of the Code shall be based on one or more of the following criteria, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and subject to such modifications or variations as specified by the Committee, applied to either the Company as a whole or to a business unit or subsidiary entity thereof, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, and measured over
- 23 -
a period of time including any portion of a year, annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years' results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Committee: cash flow; cash flow from operations; earnings (including, but not limited to, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or operating earnings); earnings per share, diluted or basic; earnings per share from continuing operations; net asset turnover; inventory turnover; capital expenditures; debt; debt reduction; credit rating; working capital; return on investment; return on sales; net or gross sales; market share; economic value added; cost of capital; change in assets; expense reduction levels; unit volume; productivity; delivery performance; service levels; safety record; stock price; return on equity; total shareholder return; return on capital; return on assets or net assets; revenue; income or net income; operating income or net operating income; operating profit or net operating profit; gross margin, operating margin or profit margin; and completion of acquisitions, divestitures, business expansion, product diversification, new or expanded market penetration and other non-financial operating and management performance objectives, or other strategic business criteria consisting of one or more objectives based on satisfaction of specified revenue goals, geographic business expansion goals or cost targets.
With respect to awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) and to the extent consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the Committee may, unless otherwise determined by the Committee at the time the Performance Goals are established, adjust the Performance Goals to exclude the effect of any of the following events that occur during a Performance Period: the impairment of tangible or intangible assets; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results; business combinations, reorganizations and/or restructuring programs that have been approved by the Board; reductions in force and early retirement incentives; and any extraordinary, unusual, infrequent or non-recurring items separately identified in the financial statements and/or notes thereto in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Notwithstanding the foregoing and with respect to awards that are not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may, in its discretion, adjust Performance Goals as it considers necessary or appropriate.
14.21
" Performance Period " is the period selected by the Committee during which the performance of the Company or any subsidiary, affiliate or unit thereof or any individual is measured for the purpose of determining the extent to which an Award or Grant subject to Performance Goals or time vesting has been earned.
14.22
" Performance Unit " is described in Article VIII(1)(a).
14.23
" Plan " is this Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.
- 24 -
14.24
" Qualified Performance-Based Compensation " is described in Article VIII(1)(e).
14.25
" Restriction Period " is described in Article VI(1)(a) and (2)(a).
14.26
" Restricted Stock " is a Grant described in Article VI.
14.27
" Restricted Share Units " or " RSUs " is a Grant described in Article VI.
14.28
" Retired " or " Retirement " is described in Article IV(3)(c)(ii)(D).
14.29
" Specified Employee " is a Vice President or more senior officer of the Company at any time during a calendar year in which case such employee shall be considered a Specified Employee for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the fourth month immediately following the end of such calendar year.
14.30
" Stock Appreciation Right " or " SAR " is a right granted pursuant to Article VII.
14.31
" Termination " is a termination of employment with the Company and any affiliate of the Company in all capacities, including as a common law employee and independent contractor. Whether a Participant has had a Termination shall be determined by the Committee on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances with reference to Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(h) regarding a "separation from service" and the default provisions set forth in Regulations Sections 1.409A-1(h)(1)(ii) and 1.409A-1(n).
14.32
" Termination on Account of Change of Control " of a Participant shall mean a Termination during the period beginning on the earlier of (a) approval by the shareholders of NU of a Change of Control or (b) consummation of a Change of Control and, in either case, ending on the second anniversary of the consummation of the transaction that constitutes the Change of Control (or if such period started on shareholder approval and after such shareholder approval the Board abandoned the transaction, on the date the Board abandoned the transaction) either:
(i)
initiated by the Company for any reason other than the Participants (A) Disability, (B) death, (C) retirement on or after attaining age 65, or (D) Cause, or
(ii)
initiated by the Participant upon written notice to the Company provided within 90 days of the initial existence of any of the following circumstances unless such circumstances are corrected within 30 days after the Companys receipt of such notice (A) upon any significant reduction by the Company of the authority, duties or
- 25 -
responsibilities of the Participant, (B) any material reduction of the Participant's base compensation as in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, (C) the assignment to the Participant of duties which are materially inconsistent with the duties of the Participant's position with the Company or those of his or her supervisor, or (D) if the Participant is transferred, without the Participant's written consent, to a location that is more than 50 miles from the Participant's principal place of business immediately preceding the Change of Control.
- 26 -
Exhibit 10.4
Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives
Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees
on January 13, 1998
Amended and Restated Effective
January 1, 2009
ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (the Plan) is to provide a means whereby the Company (as hereinafter defined) may afford increased financial security, on a tax-favored basis, to a select group of key management or other highly compensated employees of the Company. These individuals have rendered and continue to render valuable services to the Company that constitute an important contribution towards the Company's continued growth and success. This Plan provides for additional compensation so that such employees may be recruited and retained and their productive efforts encouraged. This document represents a complete restatement of the Plan effective as of January 1, 2009. The provisions of this amendment and restatement of the Plan shall apply to Plan participants who have not retired or terminated employment with the Company as of January 1, 2009.
The Plan is intended to constitute an unfunded top hat plan within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). As a top hat plan, the Plan is not subject to the eligibility, vesting, funding or fiduciary responsibility requirements of ERISA.
ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS
Account. Account means, with respect to a Participant, the account, including any subaccounts, established on the books of account of the Company, pursuant to Section 5.1, to record the Participants interest in the Plan.
Administrator . Administrator means the Administrator as defined in the Retirement Plan, or the person or persons to whom such entity delegates any of its functions under the Plan.
Affiliate . Affiliate means each direct and indirect affiliated company that directly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with NU.
Applicable Percentage . Applicable Percentage with respect to a Participant for any Plan Year means the applicable percentage used in the Savings Plan for such Plan Year to determine such Participants K-Vantage Contributions for that Plan Year.
Base Salary . Base Salary means with respect to a Participant for any Plan Year such Participant's annual base salary, before deferral pursuant to this Plan or any agreement or any other plan of the Company whereby compensation is deferred, including, without limitation, a plan whereby compensation is deferred in accordance with Code Section 401(k) or reduced in accordance with Code Section 125.
Base Salary Deferral . Base Salary Deferral means that portion of Base Salary as to which an Eligible Employee has made an annual irrevocable election to defer receipt.
- 2 -
Beneficiary . Beneficiary means the person or persons designated as such in accordance with Section 12.3.
Board . Board means the Board of Trustees of NU.
Bonus Compensation . Bonus Compensation means with respect to a Participant for any Plan Year such Participant's annual bonus compensation under the Incentive Plan or any other incentive plan of the Company before deferral pursuant to this Plan or pursuant to any agreement or any other plan of the Company whereby compensation is deferred, including, without limitation, a plan whereby compensation is deferred in accordance with Code Section 401(k) or reduced in accordance with Code Section 125.
Bonus Compensation Deferral . Bonus Compensation Deferral means that portion of cash Bonus Compensation as to which an Eligible Employee has made an annual irrevocable election to defer receipt.
Change of Control . Change of Control shall mean the happening of any of the following:
(a)
When any person, as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), other than the Company, its Affiliates, or any Company or NU employee benefit plan (including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee), is or becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of NU representing more than 20% of the combined voting power of either (i) the then outstanding common shares of NU (the Outstanding Common Shares) or (ii) the Voting Securities; or
(b)
Individuals who, as of the beginning of any twenty-four month period, constitute the Trustees (the Incumbent Trustees) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Trustees or cease to be able to exercise the powers of the majority of the Trustees, provided that any individual becoming a trustee subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the trustees then comprising the Incumbent Trustees shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Trustees, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the Trustees of NU (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act); or
(c)
Consummation by NU of a reorganization, merger or consolidation (a Business Combination), in each case, with respect to which all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the respective beneficial owners of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination do not, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such Business Combination, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then
- 2 -
outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation, business trust or other entity resulting from or being the surviving entity in such Business Combination in substantially the same proportion as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be; or
(d)
Consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of NU or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of NU other than to a corporation, business trust or other entity with respect to which, following consummation of all transactions intended to constitute part of such sale or disposition, more than 75% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, is then owned beneficially, directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities immediately prior to such sale or disposition in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the Outstanding Common Shares and Voting Securities, as the case may be, immediately prior to such sale or disposition.
Code . Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
Committee . Committee means the Boards Compensation Committee, or the person or persons to which such committee delegates any of its functions under the Plan.
Company . Company means NU and any Affiliate which is authorized by the Board to adopt the Plan and cover its Eligible Employees and whose designation as such has become effective upon acceptance of such status by the board of directors of the Affiliate. An Affiliate may revoke its acceptance of such designation at any time, but until such acceptance has been revoked, all the provisions of the Plan, including the authority of the Board and the Committee, and amendments thereto shall apply to the Eligible Employees of the Affiliate. In the event the designation is revoked by the board of directors of an Affiliate, the Plan shall be deemed terminated only with respect to such Affiliate.
Disabled . Disabled means a mental or physical condition that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months which qualifies a Participant for benefits under the Companys long term disability plan.
Earnings Crediting Options . Earnings Crediting Options means the options selected by the Participant from time to time pursuant to which earnings are credited to the Participant's Account. The option for Matching Contributions shall be deemed investments in Voting Securities and any deemed dividends shall be deemed reinvested in additional Voting Securities.
Effective Date . Effective Date means the initial effective date of the Plan, which is January 1, 1998.
- 3 -
Eligible Employee . Eligible Employee means an Employee who is a member of the group of selected management and/or highly compensated Employees of the Company designated by the Committee, acting on behalf of the Company, as eligible to participate in the Plan other than an individual that the Company treats as an independent contractor (and an individual shall be treated as an independent contractor if payment for the individuals services is memorialized on a Form 1099, and not on a Form W-2) or any individual who has signed an agreement with the Company stating that the individual is not eligible to participate in the Plan .
Employee. Employee means any person employed by the Company on a regular full-time salaried basis or who is an officer of the Company, or a member of the Board.
End Termination Date . End Termination Date means the date of termination of a Participant's Service with the Company and its Affiliates. Whether the termination of a Participants Service has occurred shall be determined by the Administrator with reference to Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(h) .
Enrollment Agreement . Enrollment Agreement means the authorization form which an Eligible Employee executes and files with the Administrator for the purpose of making Base Salary Deferrals and Bonus Compensation Deferrals and/or for electing the time and manner of payment of Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions and the earnings thereon credited to the Eligible Employees Account.
Incentive Plan . Incentive Plan means the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan, effective January 1, 1998, as restated January 1, 2009, and as amended from time to time.
K-Vantage Contributions . K-Vantage Contributions with respect to a Participant in any Plan Year means the K-Vantage Contributions made on behalf of such Participant under the Savings Plan for such Plan Year.
K-Vantage Employee . K-Vantage Employee means an Eligible Employee who receives K-Vantage Contributions under the Savings Plan.
K-Vantage Make-Whole Account . K-Vantage Make-Whole Account means the sub-account in which K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions, and earnings thereon, are held.
K-Vantage Make-Whole Compensation . K-Vantage Make-Whole Compensation with respect to a Participant for any Plan Year means the compensation paid to a Participant who is a K-Vantage Employee that is used under the Savings Plan for purposes of determining such K-Vantage Employees K-Vantage Contributions under the Savings Plan, but without the limitation imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the Code or the exclusion from the definition of compensation under the Savings Plan of amounts deferred under this Plan or any other nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
- 4 -
K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions . K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions means those contributions credited to the Participants Account by the Company pursuant to Section 4.4.
Matching Contributions . Matching Contributions means those contributions credited to the Participant's Account by the Company pursuant to Section 4.3.
NU . NU means Northeast Utilities, a Massachusetts business trust and its successors and assigns.
Participant . Participant means an Eligible Employee who has filed a completed and executed Enrollment Agreement with the Administrator as provided in Section 4.3. An Eligible Employee who is a K-Vantage Employee shall be an automatic Participant for purposes of having K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions allocated to his or her Account under Section 4.4.
Pension Committee . Pension Committee means the Pension Committee as defined in the Retirement Plan.
Plan . Plan means this plan, called the Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, as amended from time to time. The Plan shall supersede the Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers of Northeast System Companies as of the Effective Date and the benefits payable to participants thereunder shall instead be payable under the Plan.
Plan Year . Plan Year means the 12 month period beginning on each January 1 and ending on the following December 31.
Retires or Retirement . Retires or Retirement means the termination of the Participant's Service with the Company for a reason other than cause as determined by the Administrator on or after the earlier to occur of:
(a)
attainment of age 65, or
(b)
eligibility for pension payments under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies or employment related agreement with the Company, or
(c)
attainment of age 55 after completing at least 10 years of Service.
Retirement Plan . Retirement Plan means the Northeast Utilities Service Company Retirement Plan.
Savings Plan . Savings Plan means the Northeast Utilities Service Company 401k Plan.
Service . Service means the period of time during which an employment relationship exists between an Employee and the Company, as credited under the Retirement
- 5 -
Plan for vesting purposes or, in the case of a K-Vantage Employee, as credited under the Savings Plan for vesting purposes.
Specified Employee . Specified Employee means an Employee who is a Vice President or more senior officer of the Company at any time during a Plan Year in which case such Employee shall be considered a Specified Employee for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the fourth month immediately following the end of such Plan Year.
Unforeseeable Emergency . Unforeseeable Emergency means a severe financial hardship of a Participant resulting from: (a) an illness or accident of the Participant or the Participants spouse or dependent as defined in Section 152 of the Code without regard to Section 152(b)(1), (b)(2) and (d)(1)(B); (b) a loss of the Participants property due to casualty; or (c) other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant. Whether a Participant has an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be determined by the Administrator on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances and with reference to Treasury Regulations Section 409A-3(i)(3).
Vesting or Vested . Vesting or Vested refers to the time after which Matching Contributions and K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions, and their related earnings, become non-forfeitable, as provided under Section 4.5.
Voting Securities . Voting Securities means the common shares of NU, par value $5.00 or any successor security of NU which carries the right to vote generally in the election of the Board.
Year of Service . Year of Service for Vesting purposes means each year of credited service recognized for determining a Participants vesting in his or her accrued benefit in the Retirement Plan or, for a K-Vantage Employee, in his or her K-Vantage Contributions source account in the Savings Plan.
ARTICLE 3
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
The Administrator is hereby authorized to administer the Plan and establish, adopt, or revise such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Administrator shall have discretionary authority to construe and interpret the Plan, to make determinations, including factual determinations, and to determine the rights, if any, of Participants and Beneficiaries under the Plan which, subject to the claims procedure set forth in Section 11.2, shall be final and binding upon any Participant and Beneficiary affected thereby. The Administrator and members of the Committee and the Pension Committee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan while serving as such, but no such person shall vote or act upon any matter which relates solely to such person's interest in the Plan as a Participant.
- 6 -
ARTICLE 4
PARTICIPATION
4.1
Annual Election to Participate; Designation of Time and Manner of Payment . Annually, all Eligible Employees will be offered the opportunity to make Base Salary and Bonus Compensation Deferrals. Any Eligible Employee may enroll in the Plan effective as of the first day of a Plan Year by filing a completed and fully executed Enrollment Agreement with the Administrator prior to the end of December of the Plan Year preceding the Plan Year for which the deferral is to occur. Pursuant to said Enrollment Agreement, the Eligible Employee shall irrevocably elect the amount of Base Salary or cash Bonus Compensation (in each case after non-deferrable payroll tax deductions) of such Eligible Employee for the Plan Year that will be deferred and the time and manner of payment of all Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions credited to the Eligible Employees Account for such Plan Year (and the earnings thereon) in accordance with Section 6.1 and Article 7. All K-Vantage Employees shall automatically become Participants in the Plan in the Plan Year in which they become eligible for K-Vantage Make Whole Contributions, and such K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions (and the earnings thereon) shall automatically be paid as provided in Section 6.2. All such elections as to the time and manner of payment of Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) shall be irrevocable except as otherwise specifically provided in this Plan.
4.2
New Eligible Employees . The Administrator, acting on behalf of the Company, may permit Employees who first become Eligible Employees after the beginning of a Plan Year to enroll in the Plan for that Plan Year by filing a completed and fully executed Enrollment Agreement, in accordance with Section 4.1, which includes a designation as to the time and manner of payment of their Base Salary and Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) as soon as practicable following the date the Employee becomes an Eligible Employee but, in any event, within 30 days after such date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any election by an Eligible Employee, pursuant to this Section, to defer Base Salary shall apply only to such amounts as are otherwise to be paid after the date on which such Enrollment Agreement is filed and with respect to Bonus Compensation Deferrals, only to Bonus Compensation paid for Service performed after the date on which such Enrollment Agreement is filed.
4.3
Matching Contributions . An Eligible Employee who elects to participate in the Plan pursuant to Section 4.1 or Section 4.2 shall be eligible to receive Matching Contributions by the Company. The amount of such Matching Contributions for a Plan Year shall be 100% of the Base Salary and Bonus Compensation Deferrals for the Plan Year, not to exceed the amount by which 3% of the Participants Base Salary for the Plan Year exceeds the amount of matching contributions made for the Participant for the Plan Year under the Savings Plan. Matching Contributions will be credited as frequently as determined by the Administrator, acting on behalf of the Company, but in any event at least once per year. Matching Contributions will be credited as soon as practicable in the Participant's final year of participation in the Plan.
- 7 -
4.4
K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions . With respect to any Participant who is a K-Vantage Employee, the Company shall make K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions for such K-Vantage Employee each Plan Year equal to the Applicable Percentage for such Plan Year multiplied by the K-Vantage Employees K-Vantage Make-Whole Compensation for such Plan Year, reduced by the K-Vantage Contributions made for such K-Vantage Employee for such Plan Year under the Savings Plan. K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions will be credited as frequently as determined by the Administrator, acting on behalf of the Company, but in any event at least once per year and held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account. K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions will be credited as soon as practicable in the Participant's final year of participation in the Plan.
4.5.
Vesting in Matching Contributions and K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions .
(a)
Matching Contributions. A Participant becomes Vested in Matching Contributions and related earnings when the Participant has been credited with three Years of Service after the end of the Plan Year for which the Matching Contributions were made. Matching Contributions and related earnings are forfeited when Service terminates, to the extent not then Vested. A Participant is automatically 100% Vested if a Change of Control occurs or if the Participant becomes Disabled, Retires, or dies. A Participant is always 100% Vested in his or her Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals, and related earnings.
(b)
K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions. A Participant becomes Vested in his or her K-Vantage Make-Whole Account when the Participant becomes Vested in his or her K-Vantage Contributions and related earnings in the Savings Plan.
4.6
Cancellation of Deferrals . The provisions of Sections 4.1 and 4.2 to the contrary notwithstanding, a Participants Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation Deferral election under this Plan shall terminate if necessary for the Participant to obtain a hardship distribution under a qualified retirement plan that includes a cash or deferred arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Code as required by Treasury Regulations Section 1.401(k)-1(d)(3). Following any such termination of a Participants Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation Deferral election, the Participant may not make a subsequent Base Salary or Bonus Compensation Deferral election except in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 4.1.
ARTICLE 5
ACCOUNTS
5.1
Accounts . The Administrator shall establish and maintain a separate Account with respect to a Participant. The amount of Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation deferred pursuant to Section 4.1 or Section 4.2 shall be credited by the Company to the Participant's Account no later than the first day of the month following the month in which such Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation would otherwise have been paid. Any amount once taken into account as Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation for purposes of this Plan shall not be taken into account thereafter. Matching Contributions and K-Vantage
- 8 -
Make-Whole Contributions made pursuant to Sections 4.3 and 4.4, respectively, shall be credited to the Participants Account as provided therein. The Participant's Account shall be reduced by the amount of payments made by the Company to the Participant or the Participant's Beneficiary pursuant to this Plan.
5.2
Earnings on Accounts . A Participant's Account shall be credited with earnings in accordance with the Earnings Crediting Options elected by the Participant from time to time for amounts credited to the Account until such Account is paid out in full to such Participant or such Participants Beneficiary. Participants may allocate their Account among the Earnings Crediting Options available under the Plan only in whole percentages of not less than five percent. The deemed rate of return, positive or negative, credited under each Earnings Crediting Option is based upon the actual investment performance of the corresponding investment portfolios under the Savings Plan (except that Matching Contributions and earnings thereon shall at all times be deemed invested and reinvested in Voting Securities) and shall equal the total return of such investment fund net of asset based charges, including, without limitation, money management fees and fund expenses. The Company reserves the right, on a prospective basis, to add or delete Earnings Crediting Options.
5.3
Earnings Crediting Options . Except as otherwise provided pursuant to Section 5.2, the Earnings Crediting Options available under the Plan shall consist of options which correspond to the investment funds maintained from time to time under the Savings Plan. In the event of a stock split, stock dividend, reclassification, reorganization or other capital adjustment in the Voting Securities, the number of deemed shares of Voting Securities then credited to the Participant's Account shall be adjusted in the same manner as the shares of Voting Securities are adjusted. Notwithstanding that the rates of return credited to Participants' Accounts under the Earnings Crediting Options are based upon the actual performance of the corresponding investment funds (or the number of Voting Securities), or such other investment funds as the Company may designate, the Company shall not be obligated to invest any Base Salary and/or Bonus Compensation deferred by Participants under this Plan, Matching Contributions, K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions or any other amounts, in such portfolios or in any other investment funds.
5.4
Changes in Earnings Crediting Options . A Participant may change the Earnings Crediting Options to which the Participants Account is deemed to be allocated not more frequently than is permitted under the Savings Plan. Each such change may include (a) reallocation of the Participant's existing Account in whole percentages of not less than five percent, and/or (b) change in investment allocation of amounts to be credited to the Participant's Account in the future, as the Participant may elect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, in the event the Company eliminates an Earnings Crediting Option, a Participant whose Account is allocated to such Earnings Crediting Option, in whole or in part, shall be entitled to reallocate the Account and/or any amounts to be credited in the future to such Account among the remaining Earnings Crediting Options, at the time of such elimination, without regard to any annual limit on such changes.
5.5
Valuation of Accounts . The value of a Participant's Account as of any date shall equal the amounts theretofore credited to such Account, including any earnings
- 9 -
(positive or negative) deemed to be earned on such Account in accordance with Section 5.2 through the day preceding such date, less the amounts theretofore deducted from such Accounts. The value of that portion of the Participants Account attributable to Matching Contributions shall equal the value of the number of shares of Voting Securities credited to the Participants Account plus the number of such shares deemed purchased by reinvesting the earnings on Voting Securities already deemed credited to the Participants Account.
5.6
Statement of Accounts . The Administrator shall provide to each Participant, not less frequently than quarterly, a statement in such form as the Administrator deems desirable setting forth the balance standing to the credit of each Participant in the Participants Account.
5.7
Distributions from Accounts . Any distribution made to or on behalf of a Participant from the Participants Account in an amount which is less than the entire balance of such Account shall be made pro rata from each of the Earnings Crediting Options to which such Account is then allocated.
ARTICLE 6
TIMING OF DISTRIBUTIONS
6.1
Election of Timing of Distributions . In each Enrollment Agreement filed with the Administrator for a Plan Year, in accordance with Section 4.1 or 4.2, an Eligible Employee shall elect the time and manner of payment pursuant to which all Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Vested Matching Contributions credited to the Eligible Employees Account for that Plan Year (and earnings thereon) will be distributed. The manner of payment shall be elected in accordance with Article 7. The time of payment shall be elected according to one of the following options applicable to all components of the Participants Account other than K-Vantage Make-Whole Contributions and earnings thereon: (a) a date certain specified in the Enrollment Agreement (which date certain may commence no sooner than three years from the end of the plan year to which the deferral relates); (b) the Participants End Termination Date, (c) the earlier of (a) or (b); or (d) the later of (a) or (b). With respect to distributions upon a Participants End Termination Date, payment shall be made or begin on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following such End Termination Date and in no event later than 90 days following such End Termination Date. Elections as to the time of payment shall be irrevocable except as otherwise specifically provided in this Plan. In the event of an Eligible Employees failure to make a time of payment election with respect to any Plan Year, the time of payment election in effect for the preceding Plan Year shall continue in effect for subsequent Plan Years until the Eligible Employee makes a new valid election in a subsequent Plan Year by the applicable deadline for such election as provided in Sections 4.1 or 6.4.
6.2
Distribution of K-Vantage Make-Whole Account . The value of a Participants Vested K-Vantage Make-Whole Account shall be distributed to the Participant, in cash, in a single lump sum on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the Participants End Termination Date and in no event later than 90 days following such End Termination Date, except as otherwise provided in this Article 6.
- 10 -
6.3
Distribution following Change of Control . In the event that a Participant terminates Service for any reason within two years following a Change of Control that qualifies as a change in control under Section 1.409A -3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations, notwithstanding anything else in this Plan to the contrary, the Participants Account shall be distributed, in a single lump sum, in cash on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the Participants End Termination Date and in no event later than 90 days following such End Termination Date .
6.4
Changes in Elections .
(a)
Notwithstanding Sections 4.1, 4.2, 6.1 and 7.1 to the contrary, a Participant who has a Vested Account under this Plan on or after January 1, 2005 and before January 1, 2009 shall be permitted to elect (one or more times) on or before December 31, 2008, on forms to be provided by the Administrator, the time and form of payment of his or her Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) in accordance with Section 6.1 and Article VII provided that such election may apply only to amounts that would not otherwise be payable in the calendar year in which the election is made and may not cause an amount to be paid in such calendar year that would not otherwise be payable in such calendar year.
(b)
Notwithstanding Sections 4.1, 4.2, 6.1 and 7.1 to the contrary, a Participant may make elections on and after January 1, 2009, on forms to be provided by the Administrator, to change the time and/or form of payment of his or her Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) in accordance with Section 6.1 and Article VII subject to the following conditions:
(i)
No such subsequent election shall be effective until 12 months after the date such election is filed with the Administrator;
(ii)
Except in the event of payment upon death, any such subsequent election must be filed with the Administrator at least 12 months prior to the earliest date on which the Participants Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) could be payable pursuant to the Participants last election;
(iii)
Except in the event of payment upon death, the date on which the Participants Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) are paid or commence to be paid shall be deferred by not less than five years from the date on which such Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) would have been paid or commenced under the Participants last election. An installment form of payment shall be treated as an entitlement to a single payment in accordance with the provisions of the Treasury Regulations and such five-year delay shall apply to all payments under the installment form.
6.5
Delays in Payment to Specified Employees . Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, payment to any Specified Employee on such Specified
- 11 -
Employees End Termination Date shall not be made before the date that is six months after the End Termination Date (or, if earlier, the date of death of such Specified Employee). In the event such Specified Employee has elected payment of his or her Account in the form of installments as provided in Article 7, installment payments to which such Specified Employee would otherwise be entitled during the first six months following his or her End Termination Date shall be accumulated and paid on the first installment payment date of the seventh month following the End Termination Date.
6.6
Acceleration of Payment . The provisions of Section 6.1 and 6.2 to the contrary notwithstanding, a payment to or on behalf of a Participant shall be accelerated under each of the following circumstances:
(a)
if payment is required to be made to an individual other than the Participant to fulfill a domestic relations order as defined in Section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code;
(b)
if the balance of the Participants Account on the Participants End Termination Date, without reference to the balance of his or her K-Vantage Make-Whole Account, is less than $250,000.
With respect to Section 6.6(b), payment shall be made on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following such End Termination Date and in no event later than 90 days following such End Termination Date or, for a Specified Employee, on the first regularly scheduled payroll date that is six months after the End Termination Date (or, if earlier, the date of death of such Specified Employee).
ARTICLE 7
MANNER OF PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
All Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Vested Matching Contributions that are credited to a Participants Account for a Plan Year, with earnings thereon, as well as Vested amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account, shall automatically be paid in a lump sum at the time provided in Article VI, subject, except for amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account, to the Participants election on his or her Enrollment Agreement (at the time provided in Section 4.1 or 4.2, as the case may be) or special election in accordance with Section 6.4 to instead receive payment of his or her Base Salary Deferrals, Bonus Compensation Deferrals and Vested Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) in the form of 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, or 20 annual installments, and not in one lump sum, commencing in accordance with the Participants election made pursuant to Sections 6.1 or 6.4.
Subject to Section 6.6, distributions shall be made, in cash, beginning on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the distribution commencement date elected by the Participant pursuant to Section 6.1 or Section 6.4 and in no event later than 90 days following such date in an amount equal to the value of the Participants Account (without reference to amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account) as of the last business day preceding the distribution date. In the case of installment payments, the
- 12 -
amount of each installment shall be equal to (i) the value of the Participants Account (without reference to amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account) as of the last business day preceding the initial date of payment, divided by (ii) the number of annual installment payments elected by the Participant in the Enrollment Agreement or in the special election pursuant to Section 6.4. After the initial installment payment, successive payments will be paid on the first regularly scheduled payroll date on or following the January 1 of the new Plan Year and in no event later than 90 days following such date in an amount equal to the value of such Account (without reference to amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account) divided by the number of installments remaining. In the event of a Participants failure to make an election as to the manner of payment of his or her Account (without reference to amounts held in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account) with respect to any Plan Year, the manner of payment in effect for the preceding Plan Year shall continue in effect for subsequent Plan Years until the Participant makes a new valid election in a subsequent Plan Year by the applicable deadline for such election as provided in Sections 4.1 and 6.4. If an initial payment is delayed because the Participant is a Specified Employee, any installment payment scheduled to be paid within the six months that the initial payment is delayed, shall also be delayed, and paid at the same time as the delayed initial payment.
ARTICLE 8
DISABILITY
In the event a Participant becomes Disabled, the Participant's right to make any further deferrals under this Plan shall terminate as of the date for which the Participant first receives benefits under the Companys long term disability plan, as amended from time to time. The Participant's Account shall continue to be credited with earnings in accordance with Section 5.2 until such Account is fully distributed. The Participant's Account shall be distributed to the Participant in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 treating his or her Disability as his or her End Termination Date.
ARTICLE 9
SURVIVOR BENEFITS
9.1
Death of Participant Prior to the Commencement of Benefits . The provisions of Section 6.1 and Article 7 to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event of a Participant's death prior to the commencement of payment of the Participants Account, payment shall be made to the Participant's Beneficiary in a single lump sum on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the Participants death unless (except for the balance in the Participants K-Vantage Make-Whole Account) otherwise specified in the Participants Enrollment Agreement. A Participant may elect in his or her Enrollment Agreement for payment to be made to his or her Beneficiary at the time and in the manner provided in his or her Enrollment Agreement had the Participant survived. The amount of any lump sum benefit payable in accordance with this Section shall equal the value of such portion of the Participants Account as of the last business day of the calendar month immediately preceding the date on which such benefit is paid.
- 13 -
9.2
Death of Participant After Benefits Have Commenced . In the event a Participant dies after annual installment benefits payable under Article 7 from the Participant's Account have commenced, but before the entire balance of such installments have been paid, any remaining installments shall continue to be paid to the Participant's Beneficiary at such times and in such amounts as they would have been paid to the Participant had the Participant survived.
9.3
Changes in Earnings Crediting Options . In the event of a deferred distribution under this Article, the Beneficiary shall be permitted to make changes in the Earnings Crediting Options to the same extent that the Participant would have been entitled to make such changes under Section 5.4 during such deferral period.
ARTICLE 10
EMERGENCY BENEFIT
The provisions of Article 6 and 7 to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that the Administrator, upon written request of a Participant, determines, in its sole discretion, that the Participant has suffered an Unforeseeable Emergency, the Company shall pay to the Participant from the Vested portion of the Participants Account in cash, on the regularly scheduled payroll date next following such determination, an amount reasonably necessary to meet the Unforeseeable Emergency (which may include amounts necessary to pay any Federal, State or local income taxes or penalties reasonably anticipated to result from the distribution) provided that such Unforeseeable Emergency may not be relieved through reimbursement or compensation from insurance or otherwise, by liquidation of the Participants assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship, or by cessation of deferrals under the Plan or any other retirement plan maintained by the Company (the "Emergency Benefit"). Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, a Participant who receives an Emergency Benefit in any Plan Year shall not be entitled to make any further deferrals for the remainder of such Plan Year.
ARTICLE 11
MISCELLANEOUS
11.1
Amendment and Termination . The Plan may be amended, suspended, discontinued or terminated at any time by NU, through action of the Board or by the Compensation Committee of the Board; provided, however, that (a) no such amendment, suspension, discontinuance or termination, unless required under statute, regulation, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation, shall reduce or in any manner adversely affect the rights of any Participant with respect to benefits that are payable or may become payable under the Plan based upon the balance of the Participants Account as of the effective date of such amendment, suspension, discontinuance or termination; (b) no such amendment, suspension, discontinuance or termination shall cause any payment that a Participant or Beneficiary is entitled to receive under this Plan to become subject to an income tax penalty under Section 409A of the Code; and (c) no such discontinuation or termination of the Plan may be effected except in accordance with Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix) of the Treasury Regulations.
- 14 -
11.2
Claims Procedure .
(a)
Claim . A person who believes that he is being denied a benefit to which he is entitled under the Plan (hereinafter referred to as a "Claimant") may file a written request for such benefit with the Administrator, setting forth his claim.
(b)
Claim Decision. Upon receipt of a claim, the Administrator shall advise the Claimant that a reply will be forthcoming within ninety (90) days and shall, in fact, deliver such reply within such period. The Human Resources Department of the Company may, however, extend the reply period for an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause.
If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Claimant shall be provided a written opinion, using language calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth:
(i) The specific reason or reasons for such denial;
(ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Plan on which such denial is based;
(iii) A description of any additional material or information necessary for the Claimant to perfect his claim and an explanation why such material or such information is necessary;
(iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to submit the claim for review;
(v) The time limits for requesting a review under subsection (c) and for review under subsection (d) hereof; and
(vi) A statement that the claimant has a right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA following an adverse benefit determination on review.
(c)
Request for Review .
Within sixty (60) days after the receipt by the Claimant of the written opinion described above, the Claimant may request in writing that the Pension Committee review the determination of the Administrator. The Claimant or his duly authorized representative may, but need not, review the pertinent documents and submit issues and comment in writing for consideration by the Pension Committee. If the Claimant does not request a review of the initial determination within such sixty (60) day period, the Claimant shall be barred and stopped from challenging the determination.
(d)
Review of Decision .
Within sixty (60) days after the Pension Committee's receipt of a request for review, it will review the initial determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Pension Committee will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision, containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Plan on which the decision is based, a statement that the claimant has a
- 15 -
right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of ERISA and that the claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to the claim for benefits. A document is relevant to the claim for benefits if it was relied upon in making the determination, was submitted, considered or generated in the course of making the determination or demonstrates that benefit determinations are made in accordance with the Plan and that Plan provisions have been applied consistently with respect to similarly situated claimants. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Pension Committee will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.
(e)
Exhaustion Requirement . No Employee, former Employee or Beneficiary of an Employee shall institute any action or proceeding in any state or federal court of law or equity, or before any administrative tribunal or arbitrator, for a claim for benefits under the Plan until such claimant has first exhausted the procedures set forth in this Section 11.2.
11.3
Designation of Beneficiary . Each Participant may designate a Beneficiary or Beneficiaries (which Beneficiary may be an entity other than a natural person) to receive any payments which may be made following the Participant's death. Such designation may be changed or canceled at any time without the consent of any such Beneficiary. Any such designation, change or cancellation must be made in a form approved by the Administrator and shall not be effective until received by the Administrator. If no Beneficiary has been named, or the designated Beneficiary or Beneficiaries shall have predeceased the Participant, the Beneficiary shall be the Participants Savings Plan beneficiary, or, if none, the Participant's estate. If a Participant designates more than one Beneficiary, the interests of such Beneficiaries shall be paid in equal shares, unless the Participant has specifically designated otherwise.
11.4
Limitation of Participant's Right. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed as conferring upon any Participant any right to continue in the employment of the Company, nor shall it interfere with the rights of the Company to terminate the employment of any Participant and/or to take any personnel action affecting any Participant without regard to the effect which such action may have upon such Participant as a recipient or prospective recipient of benefits under the Plan.
11.5
No Limitation on Company Actions . Nothing contained in the Plan shall be construed to prevent the Company from taking any action which is deemed by it to be appropriate or in its best interest; provided, however, that no such action may diminish the then balance or value of the Participants Account. No Participant, Beneficiary, or other person shall have any claim against the Company as a result of such action. Any decisions, actions or interpretations to be made under the Plan by the Company or the Board, or the Committee acting on behalf of the Company, shall be made in its respective sole discretion, not as a fiduciary, need not be uniformly applied to similarly situated individuals and shall be final, binding and conclusive on all persons interested in the Plan.
- 16 -
11.6
Obligations to Company . If a Participant becomes entitled to a distribution of benefits under the Plan, and if at such time the Participant has outstanding any debt, obligation, or other liability representing an amount owing to the Company, then the Company may offset such amount owed to it against the amount of benefits otherwise distributable. Such determination shall be made by the Administrator.
11.7
Nonalienation of Benefits . Except as expressly provided herein, no Participant or Beneficiary shall have the power or right to transfer (otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution), alienate, or otherwise encumber the Participant's interest under the Plan. The Company's obligations under this Plan are not assignable or transferable except to (a) any corporation or partnership which acquires all or substantially all of the Company's assets or (b) any corporation or partnership into which the Company may be merged or consolidated. The provisions of the Plan shall inure to the benefit of each Participant and the Participant's Beneficiaries, heirs, executors, administrators or successors in interest.
11.8
Withholding Taxes . The Company may make such provisions and take such action as it may deem necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes which the Company is required by any law or regulation of any governmental authority, whether Federal, state or local, to withhold in connection with any benefits under the Plan from any amount otherwise payable to the Participant (or Beneficiary). Each Participant, however, shall be responsible for the payment of all individual tax liabilities relating to any such benefits.
11.9
Unfunded Status of Plan . The Plan is intended to constitute an "unfunded" plan of deferred compensation for Participants. Benefits payable hereunder shall be payable out of the general assets of the Company, and no segregation of any assets whatsoever for such benefits shall be made. Notwithstanding any segregation of assets or transfer to a grantor trust, with respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant, nothing contained herein shall give any such Participant any rights to assets that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company.
11.10
Severability . If any provision of this Plan is held unenforceable, the remainder of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without regard to such unenforceable provision and shall be applied as though the unenforceable provision were not contained in the Plan.
11.11
Governing Law . The Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Connecticut, without reference to the principles of conflict of laws to the extent not preempted by federal law. Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the terms of this Plan shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and the Company shall have no right to accelerate or make any payment under this Plan except to the extent such action would not subject any Participant or Beneficiary to the payment of any tax penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code. The Company shall have no obligation , however, to reimburse a Participant for any tax penalty or interest payable or provide a gross-up payment in connection with any tax liability of the Participant
- 17 -
under Section 409A of the Code except that this provision shall not apply in the event of the Companys negligence or willful disregard in interpreting the application of Section 409A of the Code to the Plan which negligence or willful disregard causes a Participant to become subject to a tax penalty or interest payable under Section 409A of the Code , in which case the Company will reimburse the Participant or Beneficiary, as the case may be, on an after-tax basis for any such tax penalty or interest not later than the last day of the taxable year next following the taxable year in which the Participant or Beneficiary remits the applicable taxes and interest.
11.12
Headings . Headings are inserted in this Plan for convenience of reference only and are to be ignored in the construction of the provisions of the Plan.
11.13
Gender, Singular and Plural . All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neuter, as the identity of the person or persons may require. As the context may require, the singular may read as the plural and the plural as the singular.
11.14
Notice . Any notice or filing required or permitted to be given to the Committee, the Pension Committee, or the Administrator under the Plan shall be sufficient if in writing and hand delivered, or sent by registered or certified mail, to the Human Resources Department, or to such other entity as the Administrator may designate from time to time. Such notice shall be deemed given as to the date of delivery, or, if delivery is made by mail, as of the date shown on the postmark on the receipt for registration or certification.
11.15
Disclaimer of Liability . The Declaration of Trust of NU provides that no shareholder of NU shall be held to any liability whatever for the payment of any sum of money, or for damages or otherwise under any contract, obligation or undertaking made, entered into or issued by the Board or by any officer, agent or representative elected or
appointed by the Board, and no such contract, obligation or undertaking shall be enforceable against the Board or any of them in their or his or her individual capacities or capacity and all such contracts, obligations and undertakings shall be enforceable only against the Board as such, and every person or entity, having any claim or demand arising out of any such contract, obligation or undertaking shall look only to the trust estate for the payment or satisfaction thereof.
- 18 -
Exhibit 10.5
Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies
Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies (the Plan) is to provide certain executives with (a) the benefits that would have been provided to them under the Northeast Utilities Service Company Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan) if compensation and benefits were not subject to the limitations imposed by Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 of the Code and if annual awards to Participants under Northeast Utilities executive incentive plans (including the Northeast Utilities Executive Incentive Compensation Program (the EICP), the Northeast Utilities Executive Incentive Plan (the EIP), and the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan (the IP) and other similar plans which may be adopted from time to time, each an Incentive Plan and in the aggregate, Incentive Plans) were included in the benefit calculations under the Retirement Plan, and (b) a supplemental retirement benefit in addition to the retirement benefit provided under the Retirement Plan and the benefits described in clause (a) above. The Plan is not intended to meet the qualification requirements of Section 401 of the Code. This document represents a complete restatement of the Plan effective as of January 1, 2009.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
When used herein with initial capital letters, each of the following terms shall have the corresponding meaning set forth below unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context in which the term is used:
2.1
Actuarial Equivalent or Actuarially Equivalent shall mean equivalence in value between two or more forms determined on the basis of the assumptions used in the Retirement Plan for determining actuarial equivalence between different forms of benefit at the time of such determination. Actuarial Equivalence between a joint and survivor Annuity and a straight life Annuity shall be determined by disregarding subsidized survivor Annuity benefits.
2.2
"Administrator" shall mean the plan administrator under the Retirement Plan and, to the extent a trust is established in accordance with Article XI, the trustee of such trust, their respective duties to be subject to written agreement between such plan administrator and such trustee.
2.3
Annuity shall mean a form of benefit payment that (a) provides a series of substantially equal periodic payments, payable not less frequently than annually, for the life (or life expectancy) of the Participant or the joint lives (or life expectancies) of the Participant and his or her designated beneficiary; and (b) is a form of annuity made available under the Retirement Plan at the Benefit Commencement Date that is Actuarially Equivalent to a straight life annuity.
- 2 -
2.4
Benefit Commencement Date shall mean the date on which payment of a Participants Make-Whole Benefit and Target Benefit, if any, commences, as provided in Article VI of this Plan.
2.5
"Board" shall mean the Board of Trustees of Northeast Utilities.
2.6
Cause shall have the meaning provided in the Special Severance Program for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies .
2.7
"Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.8
"Committee" shall mean the Compensation Committee that has been established by the Board, or any subsequent committee of the Board that has primary responsibility for compensation policies. In the absence of such a committee, "Committee" shall mean the Board or any committee of the Board designated by the Board to perform the functions of the Committee under the Plan.
2.9
"Compensation" shall have the same meaning as provided in the Retirement Plan, but shall also include amounts disregarded pursuant to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code, amounts (included in Compensation as earned) receipt of which is deferred by a Participant pursuant to a plan or agreement which is not qualified under the Code, and, for any period in question, annual awards under the Incentive Plan to the extent made with respect to performance during such period, each such award to be allocated on a pro rata basis to each of the calendar months in the period to which it relates. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards made under Incentive Plans after November 1, 2001 shall not be included in Compensation for purposes of this Plan; provided, however, that each individual who was a Participant prior to November 1, 2001 shall have credited to his or her Compensation in February each year while a Participant, in the same manner as such amount was credited in 2001, the target value of the stock option grants made to such Participant in February, 2001 for purposes of the Make-Whole Benefit and, if such individual was a Participant in the Target Benefit prior to October 2003, for purposes of the Target Benefit as well. For purposes of computing the value of a Participant's awards under the Incentive Plans, awards made in common shares of Northeast Utilities shall be valued by multiplying the per share New York Stock Exchange closing price on the date the award is approved by the Board by the number of shares awarded to such Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant may become entitled to receive an award or awards under the Incentive Plans, and if the amount of such award(s), if any, will be determined after the Participants Benefit Commencement Date, then a provisional calculation of the Participant's Compensation during the period to which such award(s) relates (hereinafter the "Provisional Calculation") shall be made on or before the Participant's Benefit Commencement Date, and benefits payable to the Participant under this Plan shall be based upon the Participant's Compensation as determined under the Provisional Calculation until such calculation is replaced as hereinafter provided. A Participant's Compensation shall be determined under the Provisional Calculation by including the target amount of any award to the Participant under the Incentive Plans as Compensation in the period to which the award relates. The Provisional Calculation shall be replaced by a permanent calculation of Compensation (hereinafter the "Permanent Calculation") as soon as
- 3 -
administratively practicable after the amount of all awards that the Participant may become entitled to receive under the Incentive Plans has been determined, and as of such date the Participants benefit under this Plan shall be recalculated and thereafter paid based upon the Participant's Compensation as determined under the Permanent Calculation. The Permanent Calculation of a Participant's Compensation shall be determined by including as Compensation the amount of awards, if any, to the Participant under the Incentive Plans that are determined after the Participant's Benefit Commencement Date. If the amount of the Participants benefit under this Plan as determined under the Permanent Calculation is greater than the amount of such benefit as determined under the Provisional Calculation, then the Employer shall make a lump sum payment to the Participant within 30 days following the date on which the Permanent Calculation is determined (which shall not be later than the first taxable year of the Participant in which the calculation of the Permanent Calculation is administratively practicable) equal to the difference between (a) the sum of the benefit payment(s) that would have been made to the Participant hereunder from the Benefit Commencement Date until the date on which the Permanent Calculation was determined if such benefit(s) had been calculated based on the Participant's Compensation as determined under the Permanent Calculation, and (b) the actual benefit payment(s) made to the Participant hereunder for such period. If the amount of the Participant's benefit under this Plan as determined under the Permanent Calculation is less than the amount of such benefit as determined under the Provisional Calculation, then each of the Participant's benefit payments after the date on which the Permanent Calculation is determined shall be reduced by the amount by which each benefit payment determined under the Provisional Calculation exceeded the benefit payment that would have been made under the Permanent Calculation until such time as the total amount of said reductions equals the difference between (i) the actual benefit payment(s) made to the Participant hereunder from the Benefit Commencement Date until the date on which the Permanent Calculation was determined, and (ii) the sum of such benefit payment(s) that the Participant would have received hereunder for such period if such benefit had been calculated based on the Participant's Compensation as determined under the Permanent Calculation.
2.10
"Compensation Limit Benefit" shall mean that portion of the Make-Whole Benefit determined disregarding the limitation of Section 401(a)(17) of the Code.
2.11
"Credited Service" shall mean the Participant's Credited Service under the Retirement Plan but shall exclude any additions to such Credited Service pursuant to any retirement incentive program.
2.12
"Disability" shall mean the Participants receipt of long-term disability benefits under the long-term disability program of the Northeast Utilities Service Company Flexible Benefits Plan, or its successor plan.
2.13
Eligible Employee shall mean any person (a) employed by an Employer on a regular full-time salaried basis, (b) designated an officer (excluding any assistant officers) of an Employer with a title of Vice President or of any higher rank, or who is member of the Board, (c) who is a participant in the Retirement Plan, and (d) who does not have an agreement with the
- 4 -
Company to be eligible for other supplemental retirement benefits to substitute for the benefits provided under the Plan.
2.14
"Employer" includes, individually and/or collectively as the context requires, Northeast Utilities (NU), Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO) and all other entities in which NU holds, directly or indirectly, more than a 50 percent voting interest and that have approved and adopted this Plan pursuant to Article XIV, whether or not an individual Employer directly compensates the Participant or the Participant appears on the payroll of such Employer.
2.15
"Final Average Compensation" shall mean a Participant's highest average annual Compensation earned for Credited Service during any 36 consecutive months (or lesser actual period of receiving compensation) preceding the calendar month in which the Participants Credited Service ends. In determining a Participant's 36 consecutive months of highest average annual Compensation, periods during which the Participant was not receiving Compensation shall be disregarded.
2.16
Incentive Plan or Incentive Plans shall have the meaning given such terms in Article I.
2.17
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards shall mean those awards under Incentive Plans which are intended to reward performance over a performance period of more than one year, including (a) performance units, restricted stock and similar awards, whether in cash or shares, which by their terms do not vest within a year from the grant date and (b) stock options and stock appreciation rights. Annual bonus amounts payable in forms other than cash shall not be considered Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards for purposes of this Plan.
2.18
"Make-Whole Benefit" shall mean the benefit described in Article IV.
2.19
"NU System employee" means a person employed by NU or by any entity in which NU holds, directly or indirectly, more than a 50 percent voting interest, whether or not such entity is an Employer.
2.20
"Participant" shall mean an employee of the Employer who is eligible to participate in the Plan pursuant to Article III.
2.21
Specified Employee shall mean an Employee who is a Vice President or more senior officer of the Employer at any time during a calendar year in which case such Employee shall be considered a Specified Employee for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the fourth month immediately following the end of such calendar year.
2.22
"Target Benefit" shall mean the benefit described in Article V.
- 5 -
ARTICLE III
PARTICIPATION
Each Eligible Employee shall be a Participant in the Plan with respect to the Make-Whole Benefit.
Each Eligible Employee with a title of Senior Vice President, or more senior ranking officer of the Employer, shall be a Participant in the Plan with respect to the Target Benefit if approved by the Board for such participation.
ARTICLE IV
MAKE-WHOLE BENEFIT
If a Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates after the Participant has satisfied the requirements for early, normal or deferred retirement under the Retirement Plan, such Participant shall be entitled to receive from the Employer under this Article an annual benefit having a value equal to the excess, if any, of (a) over (b), where:
(a)
is the annual benefit that would be payable to the Participant under the Retirement Plan, calculated (i) without the limitations imposed by Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 of the Code and (ii) by substituting the definition of "Compensation" set forth in this Plan for the definition of "Compensation" set forth in the Retirement Plan, and
(b)
is the annual benefit payable to the Participant under the Retirement Plan, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Retirement Plan.
For purposes of this Article IV, the annual benefit under the Retirement Plan shall be determined as a 33 1/3% joint and survivor Annuity provided the Participant is married on his or her retirement date and the Participants spouse is his or her contingent annuitant, or in the form of a straight life Annuity if the Participant is not married on his or her retirement date or if a married Participants spouse is not his or her contingent annuitant (regardless of whether or not such benefits are actually paid in such form) commencing on the Benefit Commencement Date (whether or not the Retirement Plan benefit is paid on such Benefit Commencement Date) and calculated in accordance with the assumptions provided in the Retirement Plan for purposes of determining the accrued benefit thereunder with respect to Benefit Commencement Dates occurring on or after the Participants attainment of age 55.
ARTICLE V
TARGET BENEFIT
If a Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates on or after such Participant's attainment of age 60 (or earlier, if the Board so provides pursuant to Article X) and such Participant is then entitled to receive a vested benefit under the Retirement Plan, such Participant shall be entitled to receive a benefit from the Employer under this Article having a value equal to the excess, if any, of (a) over (b), where:
- 6 -
(a) equals a lifetime benefit in an annual amount equal to 50 percent (60 percent in the case of a Participant whose participation in the Plan with respect to the Target Benefit is effective before February 1, 2005) of the Participant's Final Average Compensation multiplied by the ratio of the Participant's Credited Service at the date his or her Credited Service ends to twenty-five years (such ratio not to exceed one), which benefit may be reduced, if payment of the Target Benefit shall commence prior to the Participant's attainment of age 65 in accordance with the factors set forth in the Retirement Plan applicable to retirement benefits of employees retiring on an early retirement date. Credited Service and age are to be determined for purposes of this subsection (a) after taking into account any additions to age and/or Credited Service pursuant to any retirement incentive program; and
(b) equals the sum of (i) the annual benefit payable to the Participant under the Retirement Plan plus (ii) the annual Make-Whole Benefit payable to the Participant pursuant to Article IV of this Plan, both such annual benefits expressed in the form of a 50% joint and survivor Annuity which is calculated on the basis that the unreduced form of payment is a 33 1/3% joint and survivor Annuity, provided the Participant is married on his or her retirement date and the Participants spouse is his or her contingent annuitant, or in the form of a straight life Annuity if the Participant is not married on his or her retirement date or if a married Participants spouse is not his or her contingent annuitant (regardless of whether or not such benefits are actually paid in such form) commencing on the Benefit Commencement Date (whether or not the Retirement Plan benefit is paid on such Benefit Commencement Date).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates on account of his or her Disability, such Participants Target Benefit hereunder shall be reduced by the annual amount of benefits payable to the Participant under all group long term disability plans and policies of the Employer that are attributable to contributions made by the Employer.
ARTICLE VI
PAYMENT OF MAKE-WHOLE AND TARGET BENEFIT
The Make-Whole Benefit and the Target Benefit, if any, shall be paid to the Participant in the form of a 50% joint and survivor Annuity, if the Participant is married on his or her Benefit Commencement Date, or in the form of a straight life Annuity if the Participant is not married on his or her Benefit Commencement Date commencing on the first day of the month following the later of the month in which the Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates or the month in which the Participant attains age 55. A Participant may instead select payment in the form of any Actuarially Equivalent Annuity made available under the Retirement Plan at the Benefit Commencement Date, provided that such election is filed with the Committee before the Benefit Commencement Date.
With respect to the Make-Whole Benefit, for a married Participant whose spouse is the contingent annuitant, the life Annuity form of payment includes a fully subsidized 33 1/3% contingent Annuity to the Participants spouse, and other Annuity forms of payment available
- 7 -
under the Retirement Plan shall be calculated on the basis that the life Annuity with the fully subsidized 33 1/3% contingent Annuity to the Participants spouse is the normal form of benefit, before conversion. With respect to the Target Benefit, for a married Participant whose spouse is the contingent annuitant, the survivor benefit payable under the 50% joint and survivor Annuity form of payment shall be fully subsidized and other Annuity forms of payment available under the Retirement Plan shall be calculated on the basis that the fully subsidized 50% joint and survivor Annuity is the normal form of benefit, before conversion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no straight life Annuity form of payment is available with respect to the Make-Whole Benefit or the Target Benefit for a married Participant; only a life Annuity with a 33 1/3% contingent Annuity to the Participants spouse is payable. Both the Make-Whole Benefit and the Target Benefit must be paid in the same form of Annuity. The calculation of benefits payable under the various forms provided in this Article VI shall be determined substantially in accordance with the sample calculations set forth in Addenda 1, 2 and 3 to this Plan.
Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, payment to any Specified Employee upon termination of employment shall not commence until the date that is six months after the date of termination of employment (or, if earlier, the date of death of such Specified Employee, in which case the provisions of Articles VII and VIII shall apply). Any payment due within such six-month period will be adjusted to reflect the deferred payment date by multiplying the payment by: the product of (A) the interest discount rate used for financial accounting purposes to compute the present value liability of the Plan for its actuarial valuation for the plan year immediately preceding the Specified Employees termination of employment , and (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days by which such payment was delayed and the denominator of which is 365. The adjusted Annuity payments to which such Specified Employee would otherwise be entitled during such six months shall be accumulated and paid on the first Annuity payment date of the seventh month following termination of employment. The provisions of this paragraph to the contrary notwithstanding, a payment to or on behalf of a Participant shall be accelerated if payment is required to be made to an individual other than the Participant to fulfill a domestic relations order as defined in Section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code.
The provisions of this Article VI to the contrary notwithstanding, a payment to a Participant (or his or her designated beneficiary) may be delayed to a date after the designated Benefit Commencement Date if calculation of the amount of the payment is not administratively practicable due to events beyond the control of the Participant (or his or her designated beneficiary) and such delay is for reasons that are commercially reasonable, provided that payment is made as soon as payment is administratively practicable.
ARTICLE VII
PRE-RETIREMENT DEATH BENEFIT WITH RESPECT TO
MAKE-WHOLE BENEFIT
If the spouse of a Participant in the Plan with respect to the Make-Whole Benefit is entitled to a death benefit under the Retirement Plan, said spouse shall be entitled to receive from the Employer an annual death benefit under this Plan payable in the form of a straight life Annuity for the life of the spouse equal to the difference between (a) the annual death benefit that would
- 8 -
be payable to said spouse under the Retirement Plan as of the later of the date on which the Participant would have attained age 55 and the date of the Participant's death, but calculated based on the benefit described in clause (a) of Article IV, and (b) the annual death benefit payable to said spouse under the Retirement Plan calculated on the assumption that such death benefit is payable as of the later of the date on which the Participant would have attained age 55 or the date of the Participant's death. Payments of such pre-retirement death benefit with respect to the Participants Make-Whole Benefit shall commence on the first day of the month following the later of the date the Participant would have attained age 55 or the date of the Participant's death; provided, however, if the Participant had attained age 45 and completed 20 or more years of service under the Retirement Plan at the date of death, payment shall be made at the date of death.
No death benefit with respect to a Make-Whole Benefit other than that set forth above shall be payable under this Plan if a Participant dies prior to the Participants Benefit Commencement Date.
ARTICLE VIII
PRE-RETIREMENT DEATH BENEFIT WITH RESPECT TO TARGET BENEFIT
If a Participant in the Plan with respect to the Target Benefit should die after having become vested with respect to a Target Benefit but prior to the Participants Benefit Commencement Date, or at a time when he or she would have become vested upon termination of employment as an NU System employee, in accordance with Article X, and if such Participant's spouse is entitled to a death benefit under the Retirement Plan, said spouse shall be entitled to receive from the Employer a death benefit in the form of monthly payments for the life of the spouse in an amount equal to 50% of the Participant's Target Benefit calculated on the assumption that the Target Benefit was payable as a straight life Annuity to a married Participant as of the later of the date on which the Participant would have attained age 55 and the date of the Participants death.. Payment of such pre-retirement death benefit with respect to the Participant s Target Benefit shall commence on the first day of the month following the later of the date the Participant would have attained age 55 or the date of the Participant's death.
No death benefit with respect to a Target Benefit other than that set forth above shall be payable under this Plan if a Participant dies prior to the Benefit Commencement Date.
ARTICLE IX
POST-RETIREMENT DEATH BENEFIT
No death benefit shall be payable under this Plan in the event of a Participants death following his or her Benefit Commencement Date except in accordance with the Annuity option elected by such Participant or pursuant to which benefits were automatically paid to such Participant as provided in Article VI.
- 9 -
ARTICLE X
FORFEITURE
A Participant shall be vested and shall have a nonforfeitable right with respect to (a) the Make-Whole Benefit if such Participant terminates his or her employment as an NU System employee after meeting the requirements for early, normal or deferred retirement under the Retirement Plan, and (b) the Target Benefit if such Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates on or after such Participant's attainment of age 60, or such earlier age established by the Board at the time the Employees eligibility for the Target Benefit is established. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant shall be discharged for Cause, or performs acts of willful malfeasance or gross negligence in a matter of material importance to the Employer, payments that thereafter would have been payable to the Participant or such Participant's spouse or beneficiary may, at the sole discretion of the Committee, be forfeited, and the Employer shall have no further obligation hereunder to the Participant or such Participant's spouse; provided, however, that the forfeiture provisions of this Article X, as such provisions apply to a Target Benefit, may be amended by the express terms of a written agreement, approved by the Committee, between NU and a Participant.
ARTICLE XI
FUNDING
Benefits payable under this Plan shall be "unfunded," as that term is used in Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3), 401(a)(1) and 4021(a)(6) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, with respect to unfunded plans maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation to a select group of management or highly compensated employees, and the Administrator shall administer this Plan in a manner that will ensure that benefits are unfunded and that Participants will not be considered to have received a taxable economic benefit prior to the time at which benefits are actually payable hereunder. Accordingly, the Employer shall not be required to segregate or earmark any of its assets for the benefit of Participants or their spouses or other beneficiaries, and each such person shall have only a contractual right against the Employer for benefits hereunder. The Company may from time to time establish a trust and deposit with the trustee thereof funds to be held in trust for the payment of benefits hereunder, provided, that the use of such funds for such purpose shall be subject to the claims of the Companys general creditors as set forth in the agreement establishing any such trust. The rights and interests of a Participant under this Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge or encumbrance by a Participant or any person claiming under or through a Participant, nor shall they be subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities or torts of a Participant or anyone else prior to payment, except as otherwise provided in Article VI to fulfill a domestic relations order as defined in Section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code.
- 10 -
ARTICLE XII
ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be operated under the direction of the Committee and administered by the Administrator. The calculation of all benefits payable under the Plan shall be performed by the Administrator, subject to the review of the Committee in its discretion. The Committee shall have the sole discretion to determine all questions arising in connection with the Plan, to interpret the provisions of the Plan and to construe all of its terms, to adopt, amend, and rescind rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, and generally to conduct and administer the Plan and to make all determinations in connection with the Plan as may be necessary or advisable. All such actions of the Committee shall be conclusive and binding upon all Participants, former Participants, spouses and other persons.
ARTICLE XIII
CLAIMS PROCEDURE
All claims for benefits under this Plan shall be determined under the claims procedure in effect under the Retirement Plan on the date that such claims are submitted, except that the Administrator shall make initial determinations with respect to claims hereunder and the Committee shall decide appeals of such determinations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, with respect to a Participant, the forfeiture provisions of Article X are amended by the terms of a written agreement as provided in such Article, the claims procedure, if any, set forth in such written agreement shall supersede the claims procedure set forth in this Article with respect to the Target Benefit of such Participant.
ARTICLE XIV
ADOPTION BY EMPLOYER, OBLIGATIONS OF EMPLOYER
(a)
At the earliest feasible time or times, NU shall cause each entity in which it now or hereafter holds, directly or indirectly, more than a 50 percent voting interest and that has not less than 50 employees on its direct payroll to approve and adopt this Plan and, by such approval and adoption, to be bound by the terms hereof.
(b)
Benefits under this Plan shall, in the first instance, be paid and satisfied by NUSCO, whether from a trust set up as provided in Article XI or otherwise. If NUSCO shall be dissolved or for any other reason shall fail to pay and satisfy such benefits, through such trust or otherwise, each individual Employer shall pay and satisfy its share of such benefits, such share to be the ratio of the Participant's Compensation, as defined in this Plan, charged to such Employer during the three calendar years immediately preceding the year in which the Participant's employment as an NU system employee terminates to the total of the Participants Compensation charged to all Employers during the same period.
(c)
The Declaration of Trust of NU provides that no shareholder of NU shall be held to any liability whatever for the payment of any sum of money, or for damages or otherwise
- 11 -
under any contract, obligation or undertaking made, entered into or issued by the trustees of NU or by any officer, agent or representative elected or appointed by the trustees and no such contract, obligation or undertaking shall be enforceable against the trustees or any of them in their or his individual capacities or capacity and all such contracts, obligations and undertakings shall be enforceable only against the trustees as such and every person, firm, association, trust and corporation having any claim or demand arising out of any such contract, obligation or undertaking shall look only to the trust estate for the payment or satisfaction thereof. Any liability for benefits under this Plan incurred by NU shall be subject to the foregoing provisions of this Subsection (c).
ARTICLE XV
MISCELLANEOUS
15.1
Amendment or Termination . The Board or the Committee may amend or discontinue the Plan at any time; provided, however, that no amendment or discontinuation shall diminish the Employer's obligation to provide any benefits accrued to the date of such amendment or discontinuation. For purposes of the foregoing, "benefits accrued" shall mean the value of a Participant's benefit under the Plan, as of the date of amendment or discontinuation of the Plan, (a) with respect to the Make-Whole Benefit, based upon the Participant's Compensation, Final Average Compensation, Credited Service and Retirement Plan benefit as of such date, and (b) with respect to the Target Benefit, based upon the Participant's Final Average Compensation, Credited Service, Retirement Plan benefit and Make-Whole Benefit as of such date. A Participant with an accrued but unvested benefit under the Plan as of the date of amendment or discontinuation of the Plan shall become vested with respect to such benefit upon such Participant's satisfaction of the requirements of Article IV or V, as the case may be. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such amendment or discontinuation of the Plan shall cause any payment that a Participant or spouse is entitled to receive under this Plan to become subject to an income tax penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code and no such discontinuation of the Plan may be effected except in accordance with Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix) of the Treasury Regulations .
15.2
Cost of Living Adjustments . Cost of living adjustments applicable to a Participant's benefit under the Retirement Plan after the date of determination of the benefits under this Plan shall not affect the amount of the benefits under this Plan, and the provision of such adjustments under the Retirement Plan shall not in any way obligate the Employer to provide an equivalent adjustment with respect to the benefits under this Plan.
15.3
Headings . Headings are included in the Plan for convenience only and are not substantive provisions of the Plan.
15.4
Applicable Law . The interpretation of the provisions and the administration of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Connecticut. . Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the terms of this Plan shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and the Employer shall have no right to make any payment under this Plan except to
- 12 -
the extent such action would not subject any Participant or spouse to the payment of any tax penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code. The Employer shall have no obligation, however, to reimburse a Participant or spouse for any tax penalty or interest payable or provide a gross-up payment in connection with any tax liability of a Participant or spouse under Section 409A of the Code except that this provision shall not apply in the event of the Employers negligence or willful disregard in interpreting the application of Section 409A of the Code to the Plan which negligence or willful disregard causes the Participant or spouse to become subject to a tax penalty or interest payable under Section 409A of the Code, in which case the Employer will reimburse the Participant or spouse, as the case may be, on an after-tax basis for any such tax penalty or interest not later than the last day of the taxable year next following the taxable year in which the Participant or spouse remits the applicable taxes and interest.
- 13 -
Exhibit 10.6
Deferred Compensation Plan for Trustees
Adopted by Northeast Utilities Board of Trustees
on January 22, 1980
Amended and Restated Effective
January 1, 2009
NORTHEAST UTILITIES
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR TRUSTEES
Each Trustee of Northeast Utilities (NU) who is not an employee of NU or any of its affiliated companies may elect to defer payment to him or her of compensation for his or her services as a member of the NU Board of Trustees and committees thereof during any calendar year (excluding from the term "compensation" reimbursement of travel and other incidental expenses incurred for the benefit of, and in the course of rendering services to, NU) on the following basis:
l.
An election by a Trustee to defer payment of compensation shall apply to all or any portion of cash and/or NU common share compensation earned during a calendar year and shall be made in writing to the Secretary of NU prior to the beginning of each calendar year, provided, that each newly elected Trustee may make an election to defer payment of compensation for services to be rendered during the year of his or her election as a Trustee within 30 days after such Trustees election by NU shareholders. Any such deferral election shall apply only to compensation earned after the date on which such election is filed with the Secretary of NU. Such election, once made, shall be irrevocable for the period for which it is made.
2.
NU shall establish for each Trustee who elects to defer cash compensation a "Deferred Cash Compensation Account" (which shall be solely a book account) to which NU shall credit, on each date that compensation would otherwise have been paid, an amount equal to the cash compensation which would otherwise have been paid to such Trustee on such date. Each Deferred Cash Compensation Account credit shall accrue simple interest daily from the date thereof until the date of distribution at the rate set forth in Section 37-l of the Connecticut General Statutes (as amended from time to time) on the amount standing in such Trustee's Deferred Cash Compensation Account from time to time. NU shall establish for each Trustee who elects to defer NU common share compensation a "Deferred Stock Compensation Account" (which shall be solely a book account) to which NU shall credit (a) on the next business day following each date such shares would otherwise have been paid to such Trustee, an amount equal to the number of shares which would otherwise have been paid to such Trustee on such date and (b) on each date on which a dividend, stock split, split up, stock dividend, or dividend in kind or similar payment is made or corporate change resulting in a payment to NU common shareholders becomes effective ("accretions"), an amount equal to the number of NU common shares that could have been purchased with such accretions with respect to the shares in such Deferred Stock Compensation Account, assuming that each such accretion was reinvested in additional NU common shares on the date paid, at a rate equal to the closing price of an NU common share on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. Within thirty days following the end of each calendar year NU shall provide each Trustee for whom a Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Account has been established with a statement of the amount standing to his or her credit as of the end of that year. The value of a Trustee's Deferred Cash Compensation Account as of that date, or any other date for which the balance of such Account is required, shall equal the amounts theretofore
- 2 -
credited to such Account, including interest accrued thereon in accordance with this paragraph 2 through the day preceding such date, less amounts paid therefrom in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 5. The value of the Trustees Deferred Stock Compensation Account shall equal the value of the number of shares of NU common credited to the Trustees Deferred Stock Compensation Account including accretions thereto as provided in this paragraph 2 through the day preceding such date, less shares or amounts paid therefrom in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 5.
3.
At the time of each election to defer payment of compensation, a Trustee shall also elect to receive distribution of the amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Account, as the case may be, during the period for which such election is made, together with the interest and/or accretions thereon, as the case may be, upon, or commencing with, the occurrence of one of the following events: termination of service on the Board for any reason or a specified date which is after the period for which the election is made. Payment upon termination of service shall be made or commence on the first business day of the month following the month of termination of service and in no event later than 90 days following such date. Such election, once made, shall be irrevocable as to amounts credited with respect to the period for which the election is made.
4.
At the time of each election to defer payment of compensation, a Trustee shall designate whether, upon or commencing with the occurrence of one of the events set forth in paragraph 3, the amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Account, as the case may be, during the period for which such election is made, together with the interest and/or accretions thereon, as the case may be, shall be paid to him or her in a lump sum or in not more than five approximately equal annual installments. Such election, once made, shall be irrevocable as to amounts credited with respect to the period for which the election is made.
5.
In the event that a Trustee shall die prior to the payment to him or her of all amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts, the balance credited to such accounts at the time of his or her death shall be paid to such beneficiaries as he or she shall have designated in writing to the Secretary of NU (which designation may be changed from time to time) or, in the absence of such a designation, to the estate of such Trustee. Payment shall be made or commence in the month following the month in which the Trustees death occurs and in no event later than 90 days following such date. Payment shall be made in the form specified in the Trustees election pursuant to paragraph 4.
6.
The amounts standing in Deferred Cash or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts shall be unfunded obligations of NU payable only under the terms stated herein, and Trustees shall have no right or claim against any specified assets of NU and shall have only a contractual right against NU hereunder. Any payment to a Trustee from a Deferred Stock
- 3 -
Compensation Account shall be made in NU common shares purchased in the open market, except as otherwise may be provided from time to time by the Board of Trustees.
7.
No Deferred Cash or Deferred Stock Compensation Account shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge or encumbrance by a Trustee or any person claiming under or through him or her, nor shall it be subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of a Trustee or anyone else prior to actual payment thereof.
8.
This Plan may be amended, suspended, discontinued or terminated at any time by NU, through action of the Board of Trustees or by the Compensation Committee of the Board; provided, however, that no such amendment, suspension, discontinuance or termination, unless required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation, shall serve to diminish the rights of a Trustee with respect to amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts or accelerate payment of such amounts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such amendment, suspension, discontinuation or termination of the Plan shall cause any payment that a Trustee or beneficiary is entitled to receive under this Plan to become subject to an income tax penalty under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and no such discontinuation of the Plan may be effected except in accordance with Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix) of the Treasury Regulations.
9.
Nothing contained in this Plan shall be construed as an obligation of NU to secure the re-election of any person as a Trustee of NU, or as an obligation of any person to stand for re-election as a Trustee of NU or as a prohibition against the resignation of any person as a Trustee.
10.
Upon the request of a Trustee in order to meet legal or regulatory requirements applicable to such Trustee, NU and the Trustee may agree to value the Trustees Deferred Stock Compensation Account, including all deposits and accretions thereto, for some period of time utilizing an investment benchmark other than NU common shares, and to pay such Account, including accretions, in cash at the time or times of distribution in accordance with the Trustees original deferral election, so long as such agreement does not have the effect of accelerating payment of such account. Said agreement shall be in writing and be maintained with the records of the Company relating to the Trustees compensation.
11.
The Vice President-Human Resources of Northeast Utilities Service Company, or that person who otherwise leads the Human Resources Department of that service organization, hereinafter referred to as the Administrator, shall administer the Plan and establish, adopt, or revise such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Administrator shall have discretionary authority to construe and interpret the Plan, to make determinations, including factual determinations, and to determine the rights, if any, of Trustees and their beneficiaries
- 4 -
under the Plan which, subject to the claims procedure set forth in Paragraph 12, shall be final and binding upon any Trustee and beneficiary affected thereby.
12.
A Trustee, or his or her beneficiary, where the Trustee is no longer living, hereinafter referred to as "Claimant" may file a written request for a benefit with the Administrator, setting forth his or her claim. Upon receipt of a claim, the Administrator shall advise the Claimant that a reply will be forthcoming within ninety (90) days and shall, in fact, deliver such reply within such period. The Administrator may, however, extend the reply period for an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause.
If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Claimant shall be provided a written opinion, using language calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth:
(i) The specific reason or reasons for such denial;
(ii) Specific references to pertinent provisions of this Plan on which such denial is based;
(iii) A description of any additional material or information necessary for the Claimant to perfect his or her claim and an explanation why such material or such information is necessary;
(iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to submit the claim for review; and
(v) The time limits for requesting a review.
Within sixty (60) days after the receipt by the Claimant of the written opinion described above, the Claimant may request in writing that the Compensation Committee of the NU Board (Committee) review the determination of the Administrator. The Claimant or his or her duly authorized representative may, but need not, review the pertinent documents and submit issues and comments in writing for consideration by the Committee.
Within sixty (60) days after the Committee's receipt of a request for review, it will review the initial determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Committee will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision , containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Plan on which the decision is based , a statement that the claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to the claim for benefits. A document is relevant to the claim for benefits if it was relied upon in making the determination, was submitted, considered or generated in the course of making the determination or demonstrates that benefit determinations are made in accordance with the Plan and that Plan provisions have been applied consistently with
- 5 -
respect to similarly situated claimants. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Committee will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.
No Trustee, former Trustee or his or her surviving beneficiary shall institute any action or proceeding in any state or federal court of law or equity, or before any administrative tribunal or arbitrator, for a claim for benefits under the Plan until such claimant has first exhausted the procedures set forth in this Section 12.
13.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 3 and 4 to the contrary, a Trustee who has Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts under this Plan on or after January 1, 2005 and before January 1, 2009 shall be permitted to elect (one or more times) on or before December 31, 2008, on forms to be provided by the Administrator, the time and form of payment of his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts in accordance with paragraphs 3 and 4 provided that such election(s) may apply only to amounts that would not otherwise be payable in the calendar year in which the election is made and may not cause an amount to be paid in such calendar year that would not otherwise be payable in such calendar year..
14.
The interpretation of the provisions and the administration of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Connecticut. Anything in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the terms of this Plan shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder and NU shall have no right to make any payment under this Plan except to the extent such action would not subject any Trustee or beneficiary to the payment of any tax penalty or interest under Section 409A of the Code. NU shall have no obligation, however, to reimburse a Trustee or beneficiary for any tax penalty or interest payable or provide a gross-up payment in connection with any tax liability of a Trustee or beneficiary under Section 409A of the Code except that this provision shall not apply in the event of NUs negligence or willful disregard in interpreting the application of Section 409A of the Code to the Plan which negligence or willful disregard causes the Trustee to become subject to a tax penalty or interest payable under Section 409A of the Code, in which case NU will reimburse the Trustee or beneficiary, as the case may be, on an after-tax basis for any such tax penalty or interest not later than the last day of the Trustees taxable year next following the Trustees taxable year in which the Trustee or beneficiary remits the applicable taxes and interest.
- 6 -
Exhibit 15
November 7, 2008
Northeast Utilities
107 Selden Street
Berlin, Connecticut 06037
We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the Company) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2008 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , as of January 1, 2008); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364 and 333-142724 on Forms S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ |
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Hartford, Connecticut
Exhibit 31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Charles W. Shivery, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northeast Utilities (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
Charles W. Shivery |
|
Charles W. Shivery |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David R. McHale, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northeast Utilities (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
/s/ |
Charles W. Shivery |
|
Charles W. Shivery |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2008
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10
RELEASE AGREEMENT
This RELEASE AGREEMENT (this " Agreement ") is dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among Ambac Assurance Corporation, a Wisconsin-domiciled stock insurance corporation formerly known as AMBAC Indemnity Corporation (" Ambac "), U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States, as trustee with respect to the Bonds (as defined below) (the " Trustee "), The Connecticut Light and Power Company, a corporation organized and existing under laws of the State of Connecticut (the " Company "), and the Connecticut Development Authority, a body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut (the " Issuer ").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS , the Issuer originally issued $62,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (The Connecticut Light and Power Company Project 1996A Series), all of which are outstanding as of the date hereof (the " Bonds "), pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1996, by and between the Issuer and the Trustee, as amended and restated as of January 1, 1997 (the " Indenture ");
WHEREAS , the Issuer loaned the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1996, by and between the Issuer and the Company, as amended and restated as of January 1, 1997 (the Loan Agreement ), in consideration for which the Company agreed to pay directly to the Trustee amounts that become due in respect of the Bonds;
WHEREAS , to evidence and secure its obligations under the Loan Agreement, the Company delivered to the Trustee its 1996 Series B Mortgage Bonds (the Mortgage Bonds ), issued pursuant to that certain Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1921, between the Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company), as trustee, as supplemented and amended from time to time (the Mortgage Indenture );
WHEREAS , Ambac initially issued for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds that certain Ambac municipal bond insurance policy described on Schedule A hereto (the " Policy ");
WHEREAS , the Bonds were initially issued in the Weekly Mode (as defined in the Indenture) and were subsequently converted to a Multiannual Mode (as defined in the
|
|
|
Indenture) with a five-year Rate Period (as defined in the Indenture) effective as of October 1, 2003;
WHEREAS , the five-year Rate Period expired on September 30, 2008 and the Bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase on the date hereof;
WHEREAS , the Company has purchased the Bonds on the date hereof;
WHEREAS , the Company desire that the Policy no longer remain in effect and Ambac is willing to consent thereto, subject to the provisions of this Agreement;
WHEREAS , in connection with this Agreement, the Issuer and the Trustee propose to amend the Indenture, and the Issuer and the Company propose to amend the Loan Agreement, to provide for the termination of the Policy and the deletion of applicable bond insurance provisions of the Indenture and the Loan Agreement related to Ambac (the Amendments );
WHEREAS , Ambac, the Trustee, the Company and the Issuer (each a " Party ", and together, the " Parties ") desires to enter into this Agreement subject to the terms and conditions contained herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
TERMINATION OF THE POLICY
Section 1.1 Termination . Upon the date of execution of the Amendments in accordance with their respective terms and the execution and delivery of this Agreement (the " Effective Date "), the Policy is hereby terminated and commuted in full, and no provision of the Policy shall survive such termination, subject to Section 2.1(c) hereof.
Section 1.2 Premium . The Company and Ambac hereby acknowledge and agree that: (a) the full amount of the premium with respect to the Policy was paid to Ambac on the date of issuance of the Policy and (b) the Company is not entitled to the return or refund of any portion of the premium paid to Ambac (whether earned or unearned as of the Effective Date) in consideration for the issuance of the Policy.
Section 1.3 Fees and Expenses . In connection with the termination of the Policy and the execution of this Agreement, the Company hereby agrees to pay all fees, expenses and disbursements of Ambac's outside counsel incurred in connection with the termination of the Policy and the execution of this Agreement.
|
2 |
|
Section 1.4 Other Conditions . The Company agrees that it has delivered, or will deliver, as of the Effective Date, (i) a legal opinion of bond counsel opining that the actions in connection with the termination of the Policy will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the Bonds and (ii) a legal opinion of counsel opining that this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Company and constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, subject to customary exceptions and assumptions. Each of the Issuer and the Trustee agrees that it has delivered, or will deliver, as of the Effective Date, a legal opinion of counsel opining that the Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by such Party and constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of such Party, enforceable against such Party in accordance with its terms, subject to customary exceptions and assumptions. The Company agrees that the Bonds will be remarketed pursuant to a reoffering document with new CUSIPs and new credit ratings reflecting that the Bonds will no longer be insured by the Policy. The Company agrees and represents that (i) the reoffering document with respect to the Bonds states (or will state) that the coverage of the Policy for the Bonds is no longer in effect and (ii) filings will be made with the Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities Information Repositories that disclose that the coverage of the Policy relating to the Bonds is no longer in effect.
Section 1.5 Return of the Policy after Termination . After the termination of the Policy on the Effective Date, the Trustee hereby agrees to return the original Policy, or direct that the original Policy be returned, to Ambac.
ARTICLE II
RELEASE
Section 2.1 Parties' Release of Ambac . (a) In consideration of the provisions of the release provided in Section 2.2, effective as of the Effective Date, each of the Issuer, the Company and the Trustee hereby forever release and discharge Ambac, and its predecessors, successors, affiliates, agents, officers, directors, employees and shareholders, from any and all past, present, and future obligations, adjustments, liability for payment of interest, offsets, actions, causes of action, suits, debts, sums of money, accounts, premium payments, reckonings, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, damages, judgments, liens, rights, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees and costs actually incurred), claims and demands, liabilities and losses of any nature whatsoever, whether grounded in law or in equity, in contract or in tort, all whether known or unknown, vested or contingent, that the Issuer, the Company or the Trustee now has, owns, or holds or claims to have, own, or hold, or at any time had, owned, or held, or claimed to have had, owned, or held, or may after the execution of this Agreement have, own, or hold or claim to have, own, or hold, against Ambac, arising from, based upon, or in any way related to the Policy, including, without limitation, any claim for return or
|
3 |
|
refund of any portion of unearned premium, and including, without limitation, any and all payments made by the Issuer or the Company on or prior to the Effective Date that may be avoided and recovered by a bankruptcy trustee in an applicable bankruptcy proceeding, it being the intention of the Parties that this Agreement operate as a full and final settlement of Ambacs current and future liabilities to the Issuer, the Company and the Trustee under and in connection with the Policy, provided , however , that this release does not discharge obligations of Ambac to the Issuer, the Company or the Trustee that have been undertaken or imposed by the terms of this Agreement.
(b)
In the event of an applicable bankruptcy proceeding concerning the Issuer or the Company, the Company hereby agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify and reimburse Ambac for any and all payments avoided and recovered by the bankruptcy trustee.
(c)
Nothing in this Agreement shall operate as a release of the obligations of Ambac under the Policy to any Bondholder (as defined in the Policy) that is not a signatory hereto with respect to any claims for payment from Ambac as described in the fourth paragraph of the Policy resulting from payments made by or on behalf of the Issuer in respect of the principal of, or interest on, the Bonds on or prior to the Effective Date (subject to the terms and conditions of the Policy).
Section 2.2 Ambac Release with respect to Policy . In consideration of the release provided in Section 2.1, effective as of the Effective Date, Ambac hereby forever releases and discharges the Issuer, the Company and the Trustee, and their respective predecessors, successors, affiliates, agents, officers, directors, employees and shareholders, from any claim, right, pledge, lien, security interest or other collateral granted to the holders of the Bonds and any and all past, present, and future obligations, adjustments, liability for payment of interest, offsets, actions, causes of action, suits, debts, sums of money, accounts, premium payments, reckonings, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, damages, judgments, liens, rights, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees and costs actually incurred), claims and demands, liabilities and losses of any nature whatsoever, whether grounded in law or in equity, in contract or in tort, all whether known or unknown, vested or contingent, that Ambac now has, owns, or holds or claims to have, own, or hold, or at any time had, owned, or held, or claimed to have had, owned, or held, or may after the execution of this Agreement have, own, or hold or claim to have, own, or hold, against the Issuer, the Company or the Trustee, arising from, based upon, or in any way related to the Policy, it being the intention of the Parties that this release operate as a full and final settlement of the current and future liabilities of the Issuer, the Company and the Trustee to Ambac under and in connection with the Policy, provided , however , that this release does not discharge obligations of the Issuer, the Company or the Trustee to Ambac that have been undertaken or imposed by the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall operate as a release or termination of the rights of Ambac as subrogee of the rights of the holders of
|
4 |
|
the Bonds under the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage Bonds or the Mortgage Indenture to the extent that Ambac is required to make any payment under the Policy to such holders pursuant to the fourth paragraph of the Policy.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 3.1 Representations and Warranties of Each Party . Each Party hereto represents and warrants to the other Parties that:
(a) the execution of this Agreement is fully authorized by it;
(b) the person or persons executing this Agreement on its behalf have the necessary and appropriate authority to do so;
(c) it has no notice of any pending action, agreements, transactions, or negotiations to which it is a party or is likely to be made a party that would render this Agreement or any part thereof void, voidable, or unenforceable; and
(d) any authorization, consent, or approval of any governmental entity required to make this Agreement valid and binding has been obtained.
Section 3.2 Representation and Warranty of the Company .
The Company hereby represents and warrants to the other Parties that it is the beneficial and registered owner of 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Bonds and it is executing this Agreement in such capacity and in its capacity as the Borrower under the Loan Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 4.1 Headings . Headings used herein are not a part of this Agreement and shall not affect the terms hereof.
Section 4.2 Notices . All notices, requests, demands and other communications under this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given or made as follows: (a) if sent by registered or certified mail in the United States, return receipt requested, upon receipt; (b) if sent by reputable overnight air courier, two business days after mailing; (c) if sent by facsimile transmission, with a copy mailed on the same day in the manner provided in (a) or (b) above, when transmitted and receipt is confirmed by telephone; or (d) if otherwise actually personally delivered, when delivered, and shall be delivered as follows:
|
5 |
|
(a) If to Ambac:
Ambac Assurance Corporation
One State Street Plaza, 19 th Floor
New York, New York 10004
Attention: Legal Department
Telecopier: (212) 208-3384
Telephone: (212) 668-0340
(b) If to the Issuer:
Connecticut Development Authority
999 West Street
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
Attention: Karin A. Lawrence
Telecopier: (860) 257-7582
Telephone: (860) 258-7814
(c) If to the Trustee:
U.S. Bank National Association
225 Asylum Street, 23rd Floor
Hartford, CT 06103
Attention: Elizabeth C. Hammer
Telecopier: (860) 241-6897
Telephone: (860) 241-6817
(d) If to the Company:
The Connecticut Light and Power Company
c/o Northeast Utilities Services Company
P.O. Box 270
Hartford, CT 06141
Attention: Treasurer
Telecopier: (860) 665-5457
Telephone: (860) 665-3258
or to such other address or to such other person as a Party may have last designated by notice to the other Party.
Section 4.3 Successors and Assigns . This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure solely to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns, receivers, liquidators, rehabilitators, conservators and supervisors, it not being the
|
6 |
|
intent of the Parties to create any third party beneficiaries, except as specifically provided in this Agreement.
Section 4.4 Execution in Counterpart . This Agreement may be executed by the Parties hereto in any number of counterparts, and by each of the Parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which counterparts, when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 4.5 Amendments . This Agreement may not be changed, altered or modified unless the same shall be in writing executed by all of the Parties.
Section 4.6 Governing Law . This Agreement will be construed, performed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Connecticut without giving effect to its principles or rules of conflict of laws thereof to the extent such principles or rules would require or permit the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.
Section 4.7 Entire Agreement . This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all other prior agreements, understandings, statements, representations and warranties, oral or written, express or implied, by and among the Parties and their respective affiliates, representatives and agents in respect of the subject matter hereof.
Section 4.8 Severability . If any provision of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, in whole or in part, (i) such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement, including any other provision, paragraph or subparagraph, and (ii) the Parties agree to attempt in good faith to reform such void or unenforceable provision to the extent necessary to render such provision enforceable and to carry out its original intent.
Section 4.9 No Waiver; Preservation of Remedies . No consent or waiver, express or implied, by any Party to or of any breach or default by any other Party in the performance by such other Party of its obligations hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default in the performance of obligations hereunder by such other Party hereunder. Failure on the part of any Party to complain of any act or failure to act of any other Party or to declare any other Party in default, irrespective of how long such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver by such first Party of any of its rights hereunder. The rights and remedies provided are cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies that any Party may otherwise have at law or equity.
Section 4.10 Incontestability . In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, each Party hereto does hereby agree that this Agreement, and
|
7 |
|
each and every provision hereof, is and shall be enforceable by and among them according to its terms, and each Party does hereby agree that it shall not, directly or indirectly, contest the validity or enforceability hereof.
Section 4.11 Confidentiality . To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, this Agreement shall be maintained in confidence by the Parties, except as may be required to enforce the provisions of this Agreement in a judicial proceeding or arbitration, to comply with applicable law, rule, regulation or order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other government body, and to remarket the Bonds in accordance with Section 1.4 hereof.
|
8 |
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written.
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
By:
/s/ Dennis Pidherny
Name: Dennis Pidherny
Title: Managing Director
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Trustee
By:
/s/ Elizabeth C. Hammer
Name: Elizabeth C. Hammer
Title:Vice President
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
By:
/s/ Patricia C. Cosgel
Name: Patricia C. Cosgel
Title: Assistant Treasurer - Finance
CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
/s/ Karin Lawrence
Name: Karin Lawrence
Title: Senior Vice President
|
Signature Page to Release Agreement S-1 |
|
SCHEDULE A
Ambac Municipal Bond Insurance Policy
1. Ambac Municipal Bond Insurance Policy No. 13587BE related to the Bonds, including all endorsements thereto.
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
and
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
LOAN AGREEMENT
Dated as of October 1, 2008
Connecticut Development Authority
$62,000,000 Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(The Connecticut Light and Power Company Project - 1996A Series)
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT, made and dated as of October 1, 2008 (the First Amendment), amending that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement made and dated as of January 1, 1997 (the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement), which Amended and Restated Loan Agreement amended and restated that certain Loan Agreement made and dated as of May 1, 1996 (the Original Loan Agreement), each by and between the Connecticut Development Authority, a body corporate and politic constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut, and The Connecticut Light and Power Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut,
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the State Commerce Act, constituting Connecticut General Statutes, Sections 32-1a through 32-23zz, as amended (the Act), declares that there is a continuing need in the State (1) for economic development and activity to provide and maintain employment and tax revenues and to control, abate and prevent pollution to protect the public health and safety and (2) for assistance to public service businesses providing transportation and utility services in the State, and that the availability of financial assistance and suitable facilities are important inducements to industrial and commercial enterprises to remain or locate in the State and to provide industrial, recreation, urban and public service projects; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that (1) the term project as used therein means any facility, plant, works, system, building, structure, utility, fixture or other real property improvement located in the State, and the land on which it is located or which is reasonably necessary in connection therewith, which is of a nature or which is to be used or occupied by any person for purposes which would constitute it as an economic development project, recreation project, urban project, public service project or health care project, and any real property improvement reasonably related thereto, and (2) a project may also include or consist exclusively of machinery, equipment or fixtures; and
WHEREAS, the Act defines economic development project to include any project which is to be used or occupied by any person for . . . (2) controlling, abating, preventing or disposing land, water, air or other environmental pollution . . . or (3) the conservation of energy or the utilization of cogeneration technology or solar, wind, hydro, biomass or other renewable sources to produce energy for any industrial or commercial application; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that the Authority shall have power to determine the location and character of, and extend credit or make loans to any person for the planning, designing, acquiring, improving and equipping of, a project which may be secured by loan, lease or sale agreements, contracts and other instruments, upon such terms and conditions as the Authority shall determine to be reasonable, to require the inclusion in any contract, loan agreement or other instrument of such provisions for the construction, use, operation, maintenance and financing of the project as the Authority may deem necessary or desirable, to issue its bonds for such purposes, subject to the approval of the Treasurer of the State, and, as security for the payment of the principal or redemption price, if any, of and interest on any such bonds, to pledge or assign such a loan, lease or sale agreement and the revenues and receipts derived by the Authority from such a project; and
WHEREAS, the Authority, by a resolution adopted April 17, 1996, authorized the issuance of $62,000,000 principal amount of its Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (The Connecticut Light and Power Company Project - 1996A Series) (the Bonds) for the purpose of providing funds for the financing of construction of and additions to the pollution control and sewage and solid waste disposal facilities of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the Borrower); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to such resolution, the Bonds were secured by an Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1996 (the Original Indenture), by and between the Authority and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor-in-interest to Fleet National Bank), as trustee; and
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution of the Original Indenture, the Authority and the Borrower entered into the Original Loan Agreement, providing for a loan by the Authority to the Borrower in an amount equal to the principal and amount of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, in order to support the payment of the Bonds, the Borrower, concurrently with the execution of the Original Indenture, arranged for the delivery to the Paying Agent (as hereinafter defined) of an irrevocable Letter of Credit, dated the date of the delivery of the Bonds (the Letter of Credit), issued by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, New York Agency, for the account of the Borrower in favor of the Paying Agent as beneficiary on behalf of the owners of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the Authority issued the Bonds under and in accordance with the provisions of the Original Indenture; and
WHEREAS, in order to replace the Letter of Credit with a substitute Credit Facility (as such term is defined in the Original Indenture) consisting of credit support in the form of a bond insurance policy (the Bond Insurance Policy) issued by Ambac Assurance Corporation (the Bond Insurer) and liquidity support in the form of a standby bond purchase agreement, by and between the Borrower and Societe Generale, New York Branch, and to further secure the Bonds with the Borrowers 1996 Series B First Mortgage Bonds (the Mortgage Bonds), the Authority and the Trustee have previously amended and restated in its entirety the Original Indenture pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust, dated as of January 1, 1997 (the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust), and the Authority and the Borrower have previously amended and restated in its entirety the Original Loan Agreement pursuant to the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Borrower now desires to terminate and release the Bond Insurance Policy in accordance with and pursuant to the terms and provisions of a certain Release Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among the Bond Insurer, the Borrower, the Trustee, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and the Authority (the Release Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the Authority, at the request of the Borrower, has determined to further amend the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement in order to provide for the amendments, modifications and other changes necessary to reflect the termination and release of the Bond Insurance Policy;
- 2 -
WHEREAS, Section 11.3 of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust provides that the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement may be amended with the consent of the owners of not less than 66 2 / 3 % in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds Outstanding and so affected given and procured as provided in Section 10.3 thereof;
WHEREAS, Section 9.4 of the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement provides that the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement may be amended only with the concurring written consent of the Trustee.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual representations, covenants and agreements herein set forth, the Authority and the Borrower, each binding itself, it successors and assigns, do mutually promise, covenant and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1.
Authority for First Amendment . This First Amendment is executed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 10.3 and 11.3 of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust and pursuant to the Act.
Section 1.2.
Definitions . Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings accorded such terms in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement.
ARTICLE II
AMENDMENTS
Section 2.1.
Amendments . Section 1.2 of the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection (13) to read as follows:
(13)
From and after the date upon which there is no Insurance Policy in effect, all provisions relating to the Bond Insurer or the Insurance Policy, as the case may be, and all references to the Bond Insurer or the Insurance Policy, as the case may be, in the Indenture, the Mortgage Bonds, this Agreement, and the Bonds shall be ineffective.
ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 3.1.
Severability . If any provision of this First Amendment is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate any other provision hereof.
Section 3.2.
Applicable Law . This First Amendment shall be governed by the applicable laws of the State of Connecticut.
Section 3.3.
Continuation of the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement . Except as expressly amended and supplemented by this First Amendment, the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement is and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
- 3 -
Section 3.4.
Execution in Counterparts . This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all such counterparts shall be deemed to be originals, and together, they shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 3.5.
Effective Date . This First Amendment shall become effective when the consent of the owners of not less than 66 2 / 3 % in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds is obtained in accordance with and pursuant to Sections 10.3 and 11.3 of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust.
- 4 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by a duly Authorized Representative, and the Borrower has caused this Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officer all as of the date first above written.
Connecticut Development Authority
By /s/ Karin A. Lawrence
Name: Karin A. Lawrence
Authorized Representative
The Connecticut Light and
Power Company
By /s/ Patricia C. Cosgel
Name: Patricia C. Cosgel
Title: Assistant Treasurer
CONSENTED TO:
U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee
By: __/s/ Elizabeth C. Hammer
Elizabeth C. Hammer
Vice President
- 5 -
Exhibit 10.2
CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
to
U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
(as successor-in-interest to Fleet National Bank),
As Trustee
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
INDENTURE OF TRUST
Dated as of October 1, 2008
Connecticut Development Authority
$62,000,000 Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(The Connecticut Light and Power Company Project - 1996A Series)
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED INDENTURE OF TRUST, made and dated as of October 1, 2008 (the First Amendment), amending that certain Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust made and dated as of January 1, 1997 (the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust), which Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust amended and restated that certain Indenture of Trust made and dated as of May 1, 1996 as heretofore supplemented and amended by a Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 1, 1996 (the Original Indenture), each by and between the Connecticut Development Authority, a body corporate and politic constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut, and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor-in-interest to Fleet National Bank), a national banking association organized, existing and authorized to accept and execute trusts of the character herein set out under and by virtue of the laws of the United States, with its principal office located in Hartford, Connecticut, as Trustee,
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the State Commerce Act, constituting Connecticut General Statutes, Sections 32-1a through 32-23zz, as amended (the Act), declares that there is a continuing need in the State (1) for economic development and activity to provide and maintain employment and tax revenues and to control, abate and prevent pollution to protect the public health and safety and (2) for assistance to public service businesses providing transportation and utility services in the State, and that the availability of financial assistance and suitable facilities are important inducements to industrial and commercial enterprises to remain or locate in the State and to provide industrial, recreation, urban and public service projects; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that (1) the term project as used therein means any facility, plant, works, system, building, structure, utility, fixture or other real property improvement located in the State, and the land on which it is located or which is reasonably necessary in connection therewith, which is of a nature or which is to be used or occupied by any person for purposes which would constitute it as an economic development project, recreation project, urban project, public service project or health care project, and any real property improvement reasonably related thereto, and (2) a project may also include or consist exclusively of machinery, equipment or fixtures; and
WHEREAS, the Act defines economic development project to include any project which is to be used or occupied by any person for . . . (2) controlling, abating, preventing or disposing land, water, air or other environmental pollution . . . or (3) the conservation of energy or the utilization of cogeneration technology or solar, wind, hydro, biomass or other renewable sources to produce energy for any industrial or commercial application; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that the Authority shall have power to determine the location and character of, and extend credit or make loans to any person for the planning, designing, acquiring, improving and equipping of, a project which may be secured by loan, lease or sale agreements, contracts and other instruments, upon such terms and conditions as the Authority shall determine to be reasonable, to require the inclusion in any contract, loan agreement or other instrument of such provisions for the construction, use, operation, maintenance and financing of the project as the Authority may deem necessary or desirable, to issue its bonds for such purposes, subject to the approval of the Treasurer of the State, and, as security for the payment of the principal or redemption price, if any, of and interest on any such
bonds, to pledge or assign such a loan, lease or sale agreement and the revenues and receipts derived by the Authority from such a project; and
WHEREAS, the Authority, by a resolution adopted April 17, 1996, authorized the issuance of $62,000,000 principal amount of its Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (The Connecticut Light and Power Company Project - 1996A Series) (the Bonds) for the purpose of providing funds for the financing of construction of and additions to the pollution control and sewage and solid waste disposal facilities of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the Borrower); and
WHEREAS, the Authority determined that the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds, as hereinafter provided, was needed to finance the cost of the Project, including necessary expenses incidental thereto, and concurrently with the execution of the Original Indenture the Authority and the Borrower entered into a Loan Agreement dated as of May 1, 1996 (the Original Loan Agreement), providing for a loan by the Authority to the Borrower for such purpose in an amount equal to the principal amount of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, in order to further support the payment of the Bonds, the Borrower, concurrently with the execution of the Original Indenture, arranged for the delivery to the Paying Agent (as hereinafter defined) of an irrevocable Letter of Credit, dated the date of the delivery of the Bonds (the Letter of Credit), issued by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, New York Agency, for the account of the Borrower in favor of the Paying Agent as beneficiary on behalf of the owners of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the Authority issued the Bonds under and in accordance with the provisions of the Original Indenture; and
WHEREAS, in order to replace the Letter of Credit with a substitute Credit Facility (as such term is defined in the Original Indenture) consisting of credit support in the form of a bond insurance policy (the Bond Insurance Policy) issued by Ambac Assurance Corporation (the Bond Insurer) and liquidity support in the form of a standby bond purchase agreement, by and between the Borrower and Societe Generale, New York Branch, and to further secure the Bonds with the Borrowers 1996 Series B First Mortgage Bonds (the Mortgage Bonds), the Authority and the Trustee have previously amended and restated in its entirety the Original Indenture pursuant to the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust and the Authority and the Borrower have previously amended and restated in its entirety the Original Loan Agreement pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1997 (the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the Borrower now desires to terminate and release the Bond Insurance Policy in accordance with and pursuant to the terms and provisions of a certain Release Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among the Bond Insurer, the Borrower, the Trustee and the Authority (the Release Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the Authority, at the request of the Borrower, has determined to amend the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust in order to provide for the amendments, modifications and other changes necessary to reflect the termination and release of the Bond Insurance Policy.
- 2 -
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto, each being legally bound hereby, as follows:
- 3 -
ARTICLE I
AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1.
Authority for First Amendment . This First Amendment is executed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 10.2, 10.3 and 11.1 of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust and pursuant to the Act.
Section 1.2.
Definitions . Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings accorded such terms in the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust.
ARTICLE II
AMENDMENTS
Section 2.1.
Amendments . (a) Section 1.2 of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust is hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection (J) to read as follows:
(J)
From and after the date upon which there is no Insurance Policy in effect, all provisions relating to the Bond Insurer or the Insurance Policy, as the case may be, and all references to the Bond Insurer or the Insurance Policy, as the case may be, in the Agreement, the Mortgage Bonds, this Indenture, and the Bonds shall be ineffective.
(b)
The second paragraph of Section 2.3(G)(4)(b) of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust is hereby amended to read as follows (bold type reflects additions to the text of said Section):
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the preconditions to conversion to another Mode or a new Rate Period within the Multiannual Mode established by the preceding paragraph are not met by 11:00 A.M. on the Conversion Date (i) the Paying Agent shall deem the proposed conversion to have failed and shall immediately notify the Trustee and the Remarketing Agent, (ii) such new Mode or Rate Period shall not take effect on the proposed conversion date, notwithstanding any prior notice to the Bondowner of such proposed conversion date, and (iii) the Bonds shall automatically convert to the Flexible Mode with a Rate Period of one day . The Borrower shall by 1:00 P.M. on the proposed Conversion Date deliver to the Paying Agent sufficient funds to pay the Purchase Price. In no event shall the failure of Bonds to be converted to another Mode for any reason be deemed to be, in and of itself, a Default or Event of Default under this Indenture, so long as the Purchase Price of all Bonds required to be purchased is made available as provided above. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the event of a failed conversion which causes the Bonds to automatically convert to the Flexible Mode with one day Rate Periods, for so long as such Bonds constitute Borrower Bonds, the Borrower shall have the right to retain its Bonds on each Purchase Date and shall be deemed to have elected to retain its Bonds on each Purchase Date up to but not including the Purchase Date on which the Bonds are to be converted at the election of the Borrower to another Mode. Nothing contained in the foregoing sentence shall in any way limit, modify, suspend
- 4 -
or otherwise alter the obligation of the Borrower under the Loan Agreement to make payments in respect of interest due on such Bonds on each Purchase Date .
ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 3.1.
Severability . If any provision of this First Amendment is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate any other provision hereof.
Section 3.2.
Applicable Law . This First Amendment shall be governed by the applicable laws of the State of Connecticut.
Section 3.3.
Continuation of the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust . Except as expressly amended and supplemented by this First Amendment, the Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust is and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Section 3.4.
Execution in Counterparts . This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all such counterparts shall be deemed to be originals, and together, they shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 3.5.
Effective Date . This First Amendment shall become effective on the dated date hereof.
- 5 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Connecticut Development Authority has caused these presents to be signed in its name and behalf by an Authorized Representative, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, has caused these presents to be signed in its name and behalf by its duly authorized officer, as of the date first above written.
CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By: /s/ Karin A. Lawrence
Name: Karin A. Lawrence
Authorized Representative
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Trustee
By: /s/ Elizabeth C. Hammer
Name: Elizabeth C. Hammer
Title: Vice President
CONSENTED TO:
THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
By: /s/ Patricia C. Cosgel
Name: Patricia C. Cosgel
Title: Assistant Treasurer-Finance
- 6 -
Exhibit 31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Leon J. Olivier, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David R. McHale, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2008
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Leon J. Olivier, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David R. McHale, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2008
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Leon J. Olivier, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David R. McHale, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant);
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 7, 2008
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
/s/ |
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Leon J. Olivier |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ |
David R. McHale |
|
David R. McHale |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2008
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.