|
☒
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
001-3034
|
(Commission File Number)
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-0448030
|
||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
414 Nicollet Mall
|
Minneapolis
|
Minnesota
|
|
55401
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
612
|
330-5500
|
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
Title of each class
|
|
Trading Symbol
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
XEL
|
|
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
Item 1 —
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Item 1A —
|
||
Item 1B —
|
||
Item 2 —
|
||
Item 3 —
|
||
Item 4 —
|
||
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5 —
|
||
Item 6 —
|
||
Item 7 —
|
||
Item 7A —
|
||
Item 8 —
|
||
Item 9 —
|
||
Item 9A —
|
||
Item 9B —
|
||
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
Item 10 —
|
||
Item 11 —
|
||
Item 12 —
|
||
Item 13 —
|
||
Item 14 —
|
||
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15 —
|
||
Item 16 —
|
||
|
|
|
ITEM 1 — BUSINESS
|
Xcel Energy Inc.’s Subsidiaries and Affiliates (current and former)
|
|
Capital Services
|
Capital Services, LLC
|
Eloigne
|
Eloigne Company
|
e prime
|
e prime inc.
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation
|
NSP System
|
The electric production and transmission system of NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin operated on an integrated basis and managed by NSP-Minnesota
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
|
Operating companies
|
NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo and SPS
|
PSCo
|
Public Service Company of Colorado
|
SPS
|
Southwestern Public Service Co.
|
Utility subsidiaries
|
NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo and SPS
|
WGI
|
WestGas InterState, Inc.
|
WYCO
|
WYCO Development, LLC
|
Xcel Energy
|
Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries
|
Other
|
|
ADIT
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
AFUDC
|
Allowance for funds used during construction
|
ARO
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
ASC
|
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
|
ASU
|
FASB Accounting Standards Update
|
BART
|
Best available retrofit technology
|
Boulder
|
City of Boulder, CO
|
C&I
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
CACJA
|
Clean Air Clean Jobs Act
|
CAISO
|
California Independent System Operator
|
CapX2020
|
Alliance of electric cooperatives, municipals and investor-owned utilities in the upper Midwest involved in a joint transmission line planning and construction effort
|
CBA
|
Collective-bargaining agreement
|
CCR
|
Coal combustion residuals
|
CCR Rule
|
Final rule (40 CFR 257.50 - 257.107) published by the EPA regulating the management, storage and disposal of CCRs as a nonhazardous waste
|
CDD
|
Cooling degree-days
|
CEO
|
Chief executive officer
|
CFO
|
Chief financial officer
|
CEP
|
Colorado Energy Plan
|
CIG
|
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC
|
CPCN
|
Certificate of public convenience and necessity
|
CWA
|
Clean Water Act
|
CWIP
|
Construction work in progress
|
DECON
|
Decommissioning method where radioactive contamination is removed and safely disposed of at a requisite facility or decontaminated to a permitted level.
|
DRC
|
Development Recovery Company
|
DRIP
|
Dividend Reinvestment Program
|
EEI
|
Edison Electric Institute
|
ELG
|
Effluent limitations guidelines
|
EMANI
|
European Mutual Association for Nuclear Insurance
|
EPS
|
Earnings per share
|
EPU
|
Extended power uprate
|
ETR
|
Effective tax rate
|
FASB
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board
|
FTR
|
Financial transmission right
|
GAAP
|
Generally accepted accounting principles
|
GE
|
General Electric
|
GHG
|
Greenhouse gas
|
HDD
|
Heating degree-days
|
IM
|
Integrated market
|
IPP
|
Independent power producing entity
|
IRP
|
Integrated Resource Plan
|
ITC
|
Investment Tax Credit
|
JOA
|
Joint operating agreement
|
LSP Transmission
|
LSP Transmission Holdings, LLC
|
MDL
|
Multi-district litigation
|
MEC
|
Mankato Energy Center
|
MGP
|
Manufactured gas plant
|
MISO
|
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
|
Moody’s
|
Moody’s Investor Services
|
NAAQS
|
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
|
Native load
|
Demand of retail and wholesale customers that a utility has an obligation to serve under statute or contract
|
NAV
|
Net asset value
|
NEIL
|
Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd.
|
NOI
|
Notice of Inquiry
|
NOL
|
Net operating loss
|
O&M
|
Operating and maintenance
|
OATT
|
Open Access Transmission Tariff
|
PI
|
Prairie Island nuclear generating plant
|
Post-65
|
Post-Medicare
|
PPA
|
Purchased power agreement
|
Pre-65
|
Pre-Medicare
|
PTC
|
Production tax credit
|
REC
|
Renewable energy credit
|
ROE
|
Return on equity
|
ROFR
|
Right-of-first-refusal
|
ROU
|
Right-of-use
|
RPS
|
Renewable portfolio standards
|
RTO
|
Regional Transmission Organization
|
Standard & Poor’s
|
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services
|
SERP
|
Supplemental executive retirement plan
|
SMMPA
|
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency
|
SO2
|
Sulfur dioxide
|
SPP
|
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
|
TCEH
|
Texas Competitive Energy Holdings
|
TCJA
|
2017 federal tax reform enacted as Public Law No: 115-97, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
|
THI
|
Temperature-humidity index
|
TOs
|
Transmission owners
|
TransCo
|
Transmission-only subsidiary
|
TSR
|
Total shareholder return
|
VaR
|
Value at Risk
|
VIE
|
Variable interest entity
|
WOTUS
|
Waters of the U.S.
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
Where to Find More Information
|
Overview
|
Vision, Mission and Values
|
Strategic Priorities
|
•
|
Offering energy efficiency programs;
|
•
|
Retiring coal units and modernizing generating plants; and
|
•
|
Advancing power grid capabilities.
|
•
|
Near our Sherco plant, scheduled to close by 2030, we are partnering with local leadership and a major data center to locate a $600 million data center. Additionally, Xcel Energy actively worked to relocate a metal recycling plant near our plant; and
|
•
|
We retained Evraz Steel in Colorado, a major Pueblo employer, by partnering with the company and community to create an affordable solar solution to meet their needs.
|
•
|
Xcel Energy has offered domestic partner benefits since 1995;
|
•
|
The Company’s CEO has signed the Action for Diversity & Inclusion Pledge, for the advancement of diversity and inclusion within the workplace, and Xcel Energy has an employee-led Diversity & Inclusion Council;
|
•
|
We have been selected among the nation’s top corporations for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer equality by earning a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign’s 2019 Corporate Equality Index for the past 4 years; and
|
•
|
Xcel Energy was named to the 2019 Military Times Best for Vets Employers rankings for the sixth straight year and currently employs more than 1,000 veterans, nearly 10% of our workforce.
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric customers
|
1.5 million
|
|
|
NSP-Minnesota conducts business in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota and has electric operations in all three states including the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin electric operations are managed on the NSP System. NSP-Minnesota also purchases, transports, distributes and sells natural gas to retail customers and transports customer-owned natural gas in Minnesota and North Dakota.
|
|
Natural gas customers
|
0.6 million
|
|
|
||
Consolidated earnings contribution
|
35% to 45%
|
|
|
||
Total assets
|
$19.9 billion
|
|
|
||
Rate Base
|
$11.2 billion
|
|
|
||
ROE
|
9.31%
|
|
|
||
Electric generating capacity
|
7,712 MW
|
|
|
||
Gas storage capacity
|
17.1 Bcf
|
|
|
||
Electric transmission lines (conductor miles)
|
33,528 miles
|
|
|
||
Electric distribution lines (conductor miles)
|
80,186 miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas transmission lines
|
86 miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas distribution lines
|
10,518 miles
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric customers
|
0.3 million
|
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin conducts business in Wisconsin and Michigan and generates, transmits, distributes and sells electricity. NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin electric operations are managed on the NSP System. NSP-Wisconsin also purchases, transports, distributes and sells natural gas to retail customers and transports customer-owned natural gas.
|
|
Natural gas customers
|
0.1 million
|
|
|
||
Consolidated earnings contribution
|
5% to 10%
|
|
|
||
Total assets
|
$2.8 billion
|
|
|
||
Rate Base
|
$1.7 billion
|
|
|
||
ROE
|
8.27%
|
|
|
||
Electric generating capacity
|
548 MW
|
|
|
||
Gas storage capacity
|
3.8 Bcf
|
|
|
||
Electric transmission lines (conductor miles)
|
12,285 miles
|
|
|
||
Electric distribution lines (conductor miles)
|
27,504 miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas transmission lines
|
3 miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas distribution lines
|
2,473 miles
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
PSCo
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric customers
|
1.5 million
|
|
|
PSCo conducts business in Colorado and generates, purchases, transmits, distributes and sells electricity. PSCo also purchases, transports, distributes and sells natural gas to retail customers and transports customer-owned natural gas.
|
|
Natural gas customers
|
1.4 million
|
|
|
||
Consolidated earnings contribution
|
35% to 45%
|
|
|
||
Total assets
|
$19.0 billion
|
|
|
||
Rate Base
|
$12.4 billion
|
|
|
||
ROE
|
8.69%
|
|
|
||
Electric generating capacity
|
5,666 MW
|
|
|
||
Gas storage capacity
|
32.5 Bcf
|
|
|
||
Electric transmission lines (conductor miles)
|
24,008 miles
|
|
|
||
Electric distribution lines (conductor miles)
|
78,023 miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas transmission lines
|
2,057miles
|
|
|
||
Natural gas distribution lines
|
22,633 miles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPS
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric customers
|
0.4 million
|
|
|
SPS conducts business in Texas and New Mexico and generates, purchases, transmits, distributes and sells electricity.
|
|
Consolidated earnings contribution
|
15% to 20%
|
|
|
||
Total assets
|
$7.9 billion
|
|
|
||
Rate base
|
$4.9 billion
|
|
|
||
ROE
|
9.71%
|
|
|
||
Electric generating capacity
|
4,804 MW
|
|
|
||
Electric transmission lines
|
38,418 miles
|
|
|
||
Electric distribution lines
|
21,810 miles
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations Overview
|
Electric Operations
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
KWh sales per retail customer
|
|
24,712
|
|
|
25,263
|
|
||
Revenue per retail customer
|
|
$2,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,257
|
|
|
Residential revenue per KWh
|
|
|
11.97
|
¢
|
|
|
11.78
|
¢
|
Large C&I revenue per KWh
|
|
|
5.96
|
¢
|
|
|
5.91
|
¢
|
Small C&I revenue per KWh
|
|
|
9.43
|
¢
|
|
|
9.21
|
¢
|
Total retail revenue per KWh
|
|
|
9.08
|
¢
|
|
|
8.93
|
¢
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes biomass and hydroelectric
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Wind Farms
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Wind Farms
|
|
Capacity
|
NSP System
|
|
7
|
|
1,090 MW
|
|
5
|
|
840 MW
|
PSCo
|
|
1
|
|
600 MW
|
|
1
|
|
600 MW
|
SPS
|
|
1
|
|
478 MW
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
|
PPAs
|
|
Range
|
|
PPAs
|
|
Range
|
|
NSP System
|
|
131
|
|
0.7 MW — 205.5 MW
|
|
132
|
|
0.7 MW - 205.5 MW
|
PSCo
|
|
20
|
|
2.0 MW — 300.5 MW
|
|
19
|
|
2.0 MW - 300.5 MW
|
SPS
|
|
18
|
|
0.7 MW — 250.0 MW
|
|
18
|
|
0.7 MW - 250.0 MW
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
NSP System
|
|
2,780 MW
|
|
2,550 MW
|
PSCo
|
|
3,165 MW
|
|
3,160 MW
|
SPS
|
|
2,045 MW
|
|
1,565 MW
|
Utility Subsidiary (a)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
NSP System
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
PSCo
|
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
(a)
|
The table reflects owned wind sites that were in commercial operation for the full calendar year. The Hale wind farm for SPS was put into service in June 2019 and the Rush Creek wind farm was put into service in December 2018.
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
NSP System
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
PSCo
|
|
41
|
|
|
43
|
|
||
SPS
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
Project
|
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Capacity
|
Rush Creek
|
|
PSCo
|
|
582 MW
|
Hale
|
|
SPS
|
|
460 MW
|
Foxtail
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
150 MW
|
Lake Benton
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
99 MW
|
Various PPAs
|
|
Various
|
|
~300 MW
|
Project
|
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Estimated Completion
|
Freeborn
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
200 MW
|
|
2020
|
Blazing Star 1
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
200 MW
|
|
2020
|
Blazing Star 2
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
200 MW
|
|
2020
|
Crowned Ridge (a)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
200 MW
|
|
2020
|
Jeffers (b)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
44 MW
|
|
2020
|
Community Wind North(b)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
26 MW
|
|
2020
|
Dakota Range
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
300 MW
|
|
2021
|
Cheyenne Ridge
|
|
PSCo
|
|
500 MW
|
|
2020
|
Sagamore
|
|
SPS
|
|
522 MW
|
|
2020
|
Various PPAs
|
|
Various
|
|
~900 MW
|
|
2020 - 2021
|
(a)
|
Build-own-transfer project.
|
(b)
|
Repowering project.
|
Type
|
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Capacity
|
Distributed Generation
|
|
NSP System
|
|
736 MW
|
Utility-Scale
|
|
NSP System
|
|
266 MW
|
Distributed Generation
|
|
PSCo
|
|
557 MW
|
Utility-Scale
|
|
PSCo
|
|
305 MW
|
Distributed Generation
|
|
SPS
|
|
10 MW
|
Utility-Scale
|
|
SPS
|
|
191 MW
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Nuclear
|
|||||
NSP System
|
|
Cost
|
|
Percent
|
|||
2019
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
2018
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
Coal (a)
|
|||||
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Cost
|
|
Percent
|
|||
NSP System
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
2018
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
PSCo
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
2018
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
56
|
|
(a)
|
Includes refuse-derived fuel and wood for the NSP System.
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|||||
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Cost
|
|
Percent
|
|||
NSP System
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
2018
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
PSCo
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
2018
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2019
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
System Peak Demand (in MW)
|
||||||||
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||
NSP System
|
|
8,774
|
|
|
July 19
|
|
8,927
|
|
|
June 29
|
PSCo
|
|
7,111
|
|
|
July 19
|
|
6,718
|
|
|
July 10
|
SPS
|
|
4,261
|
|
|
Aug. 5
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
July 19
|
Project
|
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Miles
|
|
Size
|
|
Maple River-Red River
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
5
|
|
|
115 KV
|
Nelson-Wabasha
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
2
|
|
|
69 KV
|
Pawnee-Daniels Park
|
|
PSCo
|
|
125
|
|
|
345 KV
|
Thornton Substation
|
|
PSCo
|
|
2
|
|
|
115 KV
|
TUCO-Yoakum-Hobbs
|
|
SPS
|
|
64
|
|
|
345 KV
|
NEF-Cardinal
|
|
SPS
|
|
15
|
|
|
115 KV
|
Potash Junction-Livingston Ridge
|
|
SPS
|
|
15
|
|
|
115 KV
|
Mustang-Shell
|
|
SPS
|
|
9
|
|
|
115 KV
|
North Loving-South Loving
|
|
SPS
|
|
3
|
|
|
115 KV
|
Cunningham-Monument Tap
|
|
SPS
|
|
7
|
|
|
115 KV
|
Project
|
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
Miles
|
|
Size
|
|
Completion Date
|
|
Huntley-Wilmarth
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
50
|
|
|
345 KV
|
|
2021
|
Bayfield Second Circuit
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
19
|
|
|
35 KV
|
|
2022
|
Cheyenne Ridge
|
|
PSCo
|
|
65
|
|
|
345 KV
|
|
2020
|
TUCO-Yoakum-Hobbs
|
|
SPS
|
|
106
|
|
|
345 KV
|
|
2020
|
Eddy-Kiowa
|
|
SPS
|
|
34
|
|
|
345 KV
|
|
2020
|
Natural Gas Operations
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
MMBtu sales per retail customer
|
|
129.31
|
|
|
120.51
|
|
||
Revenue per retail customer
|
|
$
|
851.94
|
|
|
$
|
785.86
|
|
Residential revenue per MMBtu
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
||
C&I revenue per MMBtu
|
|
5.73
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
||
Transportation and other revenue per MMBtu
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
Date
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
Date
|
||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
897,615
|
|
(a)
|
Feb. 25
|
|
786,751
|
|
|
Jan. 12
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
166,009
|
|
(a)
|
Jan. 30
|
|
159,700
|
|
|
Jan. 5
|
PSCo
|
|
2,139,420
|
|
(a)
|
March 3
|
|
1,903,878
|
|
|
Feb. 20
|
(a)
|
Increase in maximum MMBtu output due to colder winter temperatures in 2019.
|
Utility Subsidiary
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
3.71
|
|
|
$
|
4.03
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
||
PSCo
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
General
|
Public Utility Regulation
|
Environmental
|
•
|
$345 million in 2019;
|
•
|
$335 million in 2018; and
|
•
|
$315 million in 2017.
|
•
|
$30 million in 2019;
|
•
|
$50 million in 2018; and
|
•
|
$60 million in 2017.
|
Capital Spending and Financing
|
Employees
|
|
|
Employees Covered by CBAs
|
|
Total Employees
|
||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
392
|
|
|
538
|
|
PSCo
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
SPS
|
|
779
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
XES
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
Total
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
11,273
|
|
Information about our Executive Officers (a)
|
||||||
Name
|
|
Age (b)
|
|
Current and Recent Positions
|
|
Time in Position
|
Ben Fowke (c)
|
|
61
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
August 2011 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo, and SPS
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Brett C. Carter
|
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Customer and Innovation Officer, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
May 2018 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Shared Services Executive, Bank of America, an institutional investment bank and financial services company
|
|
October 2015 — May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Bank of America
|
|
March 2015 — October 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Distribution Officer, Duke Energy Co., an electric power company
|
|
February 2013 — March 2015
|
Christopher B. Clark
|
|
53
|
|
President and Director, NSP-Minnesota
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
David L. Eves (d)
|
|
61
|
|
Executive Vice President and Group President, Utilities, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
March 2018 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
President and Director, PSCo
|
|
January 2015 — February 2018
|
Darla Figoli
|
|
57
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Employee Services, Chief Human Resources Officer, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
May 2018 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Employee Services, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
May 2015 — May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
February 2010 — May 2015
|
Robert C. Frenzel (c)
|
|
49
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
May 2016 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Luminant, a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (e)
|
|
February 2012 — April 2016
|
David T. Hudson
|
|
59
|
|
President and Director, SPS
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Alice Jackson
|
|
41
|
|
President and Director, PSCo
|
|
May 2018 — Present
|
|
|
|
|
Area Vice President, Strategic Revenue Initiatives, Xcel Energy Services Inc.
|
|
November 2016 — May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs, PSCo
|
|
November 2013 — November 2016
|
Kent T. Larson (f)
|
|
60
|
|
Executive Vice President and Group President Operations, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Timothy O’Connor (g)
|
|
60
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Nuclear Officer, Xcel Energy Services Inc.
|
|
February 2013 — Present
|
Judy M. Poferl (h)
|
|
60
|
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Executive Services, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Jeffrey S. Savage
|
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Mark E. Stoering
|
|
59
|
|
President and Director, NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
Scott M. Wilensky
|
|
63
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
January 2015 — Present
|
(a)
|
No family relationships exist between any of the executive officers or directors.
|
(b)
|
Ages as of Dec. 31, 2019.
|
(c)
|
Effective March 31, 2020, Mr. Fowke will cease to serve as President and Mr. Frenzel will become President and Chief Operating Officer of Xcel Energy Inc. At the same time, Brian J. Van Abel will become Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Xcel Energy Inc.
|
(d)
|
Effective May 1, 2020, Mr. Eves will be retiring from the Company after retiring from his executive officer positions effective March 30, 2020.
|
(e)
|
In April 2014, Energy Future Holdings Corp., the majority of its subsidiaries, including TCEH the parent company of Luminant, filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. TCEH emerged from Chapter 11 in October 2016.
|
(f)
|
Effective May 31, 2020, Mr. Larson will be leaving the Company after ceasing to serve in his executive officer positions effective March 30, 2020.
|
(g)
|
Effective March 31, 2020, Mr. O’Connor will become Executive Vice President, Chief Generation Officer.
|
(h)
|
Effective March 31, 2020, Ms. Poferl will be retiring from the Company. Frank Prager has been elected to serve with the title of Senior Vice President, Strategy and Planning and External Affairs effective March 1, 2020.
|
ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS
|
•
|
Hazards associated with the use of radioactive material in energy production, including management, handling, storage and disposal;
|
•
|
Limitations on insurance available to cover losses that may arise in connection with nuclear operations, as well as obligations to contribute to an insurance pool in the event of damages at a covered U.S. reactor; and
|
•
|
Technological and financial uncertainties related to the costs of decommissioning nuclear plants may cause our funding obligations to change.
|
ITEM 1B — UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
ITEM 2 — PROPERTIES
|
NSP-Minnesota
Station, Location and Unit
|
|
Fuel
|
|
Installed
|
|
MW (a)
|
|
|
Steam:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.S. King-Bayport, MN, 1 Unit
|
|
Coal
|
|
1968
|
|
511
|
|
|
Sherco-Becker, MN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit 1
|
|
Coal
|
|
1976
|
|
680
|
|
|
Unit 2
|
|
Coal
|
|
1977
|
|
682
|
|
|
Unit 3
|
|
Coal
|
|
1987
|
|
517
|
|
(b)
|
Monticello, MN, 1 Unit
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
1971
|
|
617
|
|
|
PI-Welch, MN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit 1
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
1973
|
|
521
|
|
|
Unit 2
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
1974
|
|
519
|
|
|
Various locations, 4 Units
|
|
Wood/Refuse
|
|
Various
|
|
36
|
|
(c)
|
Combustion Turbine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angus Anson-Sioux Falls, SD, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1994 - 2005
|
|
327
|
|
|
Black Dog-Burnsville, MN, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1987 - 2018
|
|
494
|
|
|
Blue Lake-Shakopee, MN, 6 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1974 - 2005
|
|
453
|
|
|
High Bridge-St. Paul, MN, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2008
|
|
530
|
|
|
Inver Hills-Inver Grove Heights, MN, 6 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1972
|
|
282
|
|
|
Riverside-Minneapolis, MN, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2009
|
|
454
|
|
|
Various locations, 7 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Various
|
|
10
|
|
|
Wind:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Border-Rolette County, ND, 75 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2015
|
|
148
|
|
(d)
|
Courtenay Wind-Stutsman County, ND, 100 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2016
|
|
190
|
|
(d)
|
Foxtail-Dickey County, ND, 75 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2019
|
|
150
|
|
(d)
|
Grand Meadow-Mower County, MN, 67 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2008
|
|
99
|
|
(d)
|
Lake Benton-Pipestone County, MN, 44 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2019
|
|
99
|
|
(d)
|
Nobles-Nobles County, MN, 134 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2010
|
|
197
|
|
(d)
|
Pleasant Valley-Mower County, MN, 100 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2015
|
|
196
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
7,712
|
|
|
(a)
|
Summer 2019 net dependable capacity.
|
(b)
|
Based on NSP-Minnesota’s ownership of 59%.
|
(c)
|
Refuse-derived fuel is made from municipal solid waste.
|
(d)
|
Values disclosed are the maximum generation levels for these wind units. Capacity is attainable only when wind conditions are sufficiently available (on-demand net dependable capacity is zero).
|
NSP-Wisconsin
Station, Location and Unit
|
|
Fuel
|
|
Installed
|
|
MW (a)
|
|
|
Steam:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bay Front-Ashland, WI, 2 Units
|
|
Coal/Wood/Natural Gas
|
|
1948 - 1956
|
|
41
|
|
|
French Island-La Crosse, WI, 2 Units
|
|
Wood/Refuse
|
|
1940 - 1948
|
|
16
|
|
(b)
|
Combustion Turbine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French Island-La Crosse, WI, 2 Units
|
|
Oil
|
|
1974
|
|
122
|
|
|
Wheaton-Eau Claire, WI, 5 Units
|
|
Natural Gas/Oil
|
|
1973
|
|
234
|
|
|
Hydro:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various locations, 63 Units
|
|
Hydro
|
|
Various
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
548
|
|
|
(a)
|
Summer 2019 net dependable capacity.
|
(b)
|
Refuse-derived fuel is made from municipal solid waste.
|
PSCo
Station, Location and Unit
|
|
Fuel
|
|
Installed
|
|
MW (a)
|
|
|
Steam:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comanche-Pueblo, CO (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit 1
|
|
Coal
|
|
1973
|
|
325
|
|
|
Unit 2
|
|
Coal
|
|
1975
|
|
335
|
|
|
Unit 3
|
|
Coal
|
|
2010
|
|
500
|
|
(c)
|
Craig-Craig, CO, 2 Units (d)
|
|
Coal
|
|
1979 - 1980
|
|
82
|
|
(e)
|
Hayden-Hayden, CO, 2 Units
|
|
Coal
|
|
1965 - 1976
|
|
233
|
|
(f)
|
Pawnee-Brush, CO, 1 Unit
|
|
Coal
|
|
1981
|
|
505
|
|
|
Cherokee-Denver, CO, 1 Unit
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1968
|
|
310
|
|
|
Combustion Turbine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Spruce-Aurora, CO, 2 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2003
|
|
264
|
|
|
Cherokee-Denver, CO, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2015
|
|
576
|
|
|
Fort St. Vrain-Platteville, CO, 6 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1972 - 2009
|
|
968
|
|
|
Rocky Mountain-Keenesburg, CO, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2004
|
|
580
|
|
|
Various locations, 6 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Various
|
|
171
|
|
|
Hydro:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabin Creek-Georgetown, CO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pumped Storage, 2 Units
|
|
Hydro
|
|
1967
|
|
210
|
|
|
Various locations, 8 Units
|
|
Hydro
|
|
Various
|
|
25
|
|
|
Wind:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rush Creek, CO, 300 units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2018
|
|
582
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
5,666
|
|
|
(a)
|
Summer 2019 net dependable capacity.
|
(b)
|
In 2018, the CPUC approved early retirement of PSCo’s Comanche Units 1 and 2 in 2022 and 2025, respectively.
|
(c)
|
Based on PSCo’s ownership of 67%.
|
(d)
|
Craig Unit 1 is expected to be retired early in 2025.
|
(e)
|
Based on PSCo’s ownership of 10%.
|
(f)
|
Based on PSCo’s ownership of 76% of Unit 1 and 37% of Unit 2.
|
(g)
|
Values disclosed are the maximum generation levels for these wind units. Capacity is attainable only when wind conditions are sufficiently available (on-demand net dependable capacity is zero).
|
SPS
Station, Location and Unit
|
|
Fuel
|
|
Installed
|
|
MW (a)
|
|
|
Steam:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cunningham-Hobbs, NM, 2 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1957 - 1965
|
|
189
|
|
|
Harrington-Amarillo, TX, 3 Units
|
|
Coal
|
|
1976 - 1980
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
Jones-Lubbock, TX, 2 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1971 - 1974
|
|
486
|
|
|
Maddox-Hobbs, NM, 1 Unit
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1967
|
|
112
|
|
|
Nichols-Amarillo, TX, 3 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1960 - 1968
|
|
457
|
|
|
Plant X-Earth, TX, 4 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1952 - 1964
|
|
411
|
|
|
Tolk-Muleshoe, TX, 2 Units
|
|
Coal
|
|
1982 - 1985
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
Combustion Turbine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cunningham-Hobbs, NM, 2 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1997
|
|
209
|
|
|
Jones-Lubbock, TX, 2 Units
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
2011 - 2013
|
|
334
|
|
|
Maddox-Hobbs, NM, 1 Unit
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
1963 - 1976
|
|
61
|
|
|
Wind:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hale-Plainview, TX, 239 Units
|
|
Wind
|
|
2019
|
|
460
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
4,804
|
|
|
(a)
|
Summer 2019 net dependable capacity.
|
(b)
|
Values disclosed are the maximum generation levels for these wind units. Capacity is attainable only when wind conditions are sufficiently available (on-demand net dependable capacity is zero).
|
Conductor Miles
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
PSCo
|
|
SPS
|
||||
500 KV
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
345 KV
|
|
13,133
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
9,566
|
|
230 KV
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
161 KV
|
|
673
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
138 KV
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
—
|
|
115 KV
|
|
8,045
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
|
14,662
|
|
Less than 115 KV
|
|
86,743
|
|
|
32,816
|
|
|
79,740
|
|
|
26,216
|
|
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
PSCo
|
|
SPS
|
||||
Quantity
|
|
346
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
452
|
|
Miles
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
PSCo
|
|
SPS
|
|
WGI
|
|||||
Transmission
|
|
86
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
11
|
|
Distribution
|
|
10,518
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
22,633
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
ITEM 3 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
ITEM 4 — MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
ITEM 5 — MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
*
|
$100 invested on Dec. 31, 2014 in stock or index — including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal years ended Dec. 31.
|
ITEM 6 — SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
(Millions of Dollars, Millions of Shares, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||||||||
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
11,529
|
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
|
$
|
11,404
|
|
|
$
|
11,107
|
|
|
$
|
11,024
|
|
Operating expenses (a)
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
|
8,867
|
|
|
9,024
|
|
|||||
Net income
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
984
|
|
|||||
Earnings available to common shareholders
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
984
|
|
|||||
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|||||
Financial information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|||||
Total assets (b) (c)
|
|
50,448
|
|
|
45,987
|
|
|
43,030
|
|
|
41,155
|
|
|
38,821
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt (c) (d)
|
|
17,407
|
|
|
15,803
|
|
|
14,520
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
12,399
|
|
(a)
|
As a result of adopting ASU No. 2017-07 (Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, Topic 715), $33 million and $26 million of pension costs were retrospectively reclassified from O&M expenses to other income, net on the consolidated statements of income for the years ended Dec. 31, 2017 and Dec. 31, 2016, respectively.
|
(b)
|
As a result of adopting ASU No. 2015-17 (Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, Topic 740), $140 million of current deferred income taxes was retrospectively reclassified to long-term deferred income tax liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2015.
|
(c)
|
As a result of adopting ASU No. 2015-03 (Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, Subtopic 835-30), $92 million of deferred debt issuance costs was retrospectively reclassified from other noncurrent assets to long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2015.
|
(d)
|
As a result of adopting Leases, Topic 842, finance lease obligations of $77 million are included in other noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2019. These obligations were included in long-term debt prior to 2019.
|
ITEM 7 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
GAAP and Ongoing Diluted EPS
|
|
GAAP and Ongoing Diluted EPS
|
||||
PSCo
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
||
SPS
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries (a)
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
||
Regulated utility (b)
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. and other
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
||
Total (b)
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
$
|
2.47
|
|
(a)
|
Includes income taxes.
|
(b)
|
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
||||
|
|
|
||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
Dec. 31
|
||
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS - 2018
|
|
$
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
|
||
Components of change — 2019 vs. 2018
|
|
|
||
Higher electric margins
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
Lower ETR (a)
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
Higher natural gas margins
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
Lower O&M
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
Higher depreciation and amortization
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
Higher interest
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
Lower AFUDC
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS — 2019
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
(a)
|
Includes PTCs and timing of tax reform regulatory decisions, which are primarily offset in electric margin.
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||
ROE
|
|
GAAP and Ongoing ROE
|
|
GAAP and Ongoing ROE
|
||
PSCo
|
|
8.69
|
%
|
|
9.10
|
%
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
8.91
|
|
SPS
|
|
9.71
|
|
|
9.14
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
8.27
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
Operating Companies
|
|
9.06
|
|
|
9.14
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|
10.78
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
2019 vs.
Normal |
|
2018 vs.
Normal |
|
2019 vs.
2018 |
||||||
Retail electric
|
$
|
0.040
|
|
|
$
|
0.114
|
|
|
$
|
(0.074
|
)
|
Firm natural gas
|
0.027
|
|
|
0.007
|
|
|
0.020
|
|
|||
Total (excluding decoupling)
|
$
|
0.067
|
|
|
$
|
0.121
|
|
|
$
|
(0.054
|
)
|
Decoupling — Minnesota electric
|
—
|
|
|
(0.051
|
)
|
|
0.051
|
|
|||
Total (adjusted for recovery from decoupling)
|
$
|
0.067
|
|
|
$
|
0.070
|
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
SPS
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|||||
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Electric C&I
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Total retail electric sales
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Firm natural gas sales
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
SPS
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|||||
Weather-normalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Electric residential
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Electric C&I
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Total retail electric sales
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Firm natural gas sales
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
2.7
|
|
•
|
PSCo — Residential sales declined due to lower use per customer, partially offset by an increased number of customers. The decline in C&I was mainly due to lower use per customer, primarily led by customers in the food products and service industries, partially offset by growth in the metal mining and fabricated metal and industries. The decrease in customer use was partially offset by an increase in the number of C&I customers;
|
•
|
NSP-Minnesota — Flat residential sales reflect lower use per customer offset by customer additions. The decline in C&I sales was a result of customer growth being offset by lower use per customer, and certain customers moving to co-generation. Decreased sales to C&I customers were driven by the energy and manufacturing sectors;
|
•
|
SPS — Residential sales grew largely due to an increase in customers and higher use per customer. C&I sales grew based on higher use per small C&I customer and an overall increase in the number of C&I customers. In addition, the increase in C&I sales was driven by the oil and natural gas industry in the Southeastern New Mexico, Permian Basin area; and
|
•
|
NSP-Wisconsin — Residential sales growth was primarily attributable to customer additions and more use per customer. The decline in C&I sales was largely due to lower use per customer and decreased sales to the frac sand mining, food and manufacturing sectors, which was partially offset by customer additions.
|
•
|
Overall natural gas sales reflect an increase in the number of customers combined with higher customer use, particularly C&I at PSCo. This was partially offset by a decline in C&I sales at NSP-Wisconsin, driven by the frac sand mining industry.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
||
Non-fuel riders (a)
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
Regulatory rate outcomes (Minnesota, New Mexico, North and South Dakota)
|
|
95
|
|
|
Implementation of lease accounting standard (offset in interest expense and amortization)
|
|
22
|
|
|
Purchased capacity costs
|
|
22
|
|
|
Demand revenue
|
|
20
|
|
|
Wholesale transmission revenue (net)
|
|
11
|
|
|
Timing of tax reform regulatory decisions (offset in income tax and amortization)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
Estimated impact of weather (net of Minnesota decoupling)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Firm wholesale generation
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
Sales declines (excluding weather impact)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
23
|
|
|
Total increase in electric margin
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
(a)
|
Includes approximately $60 million of additional PTC benefit (grossed-up for tax) as compared to 2018, which are credited to customers through various regulatory mechanisms.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
||
Infrastructure and integrity riders
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Estimated impact of weather
|
|
14
|
|
|
Transport sales
|
|
7
|
|
|
Retail sales growth
|
|
7
|
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
7
|
|
|
Total increase in natural gas margin
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019 vs. 2018
|
||
Plant generation
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Nuclear plant operations and amortization
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
Transmission
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
Distribution
|
|
16
|
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total decrease in O&M expenses
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
•
|
Plant generation, transmission and distribution costs were lower due to timing of maintenance activities;
|
•
|
Nuclear plant operations and amortization were lower largely reflecting improved operating efficiencies and reduced refueling outage costs; and
|
•
|
Distribution expenses in 2019 were higher than 2018 due to storms, labor and overtime incurred primarily in the first six months of 2019.
|
|
|
Contribution (Millions of Dollars)
|
||||||
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Xcel Energy Inc. financing costs
|
|
$
|
(128
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
Eloigne (a)
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. taxes and other results
|
|
12
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
||
Total Xcel Energy Inc. and other costs
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
Contribution (Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share)
|
||||||
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Xcel Energy Inc. financing costs
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Eloigne (a)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. taxes and other results
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||
Total Xcel Energy Inc. and other costs
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
(a)
|
Amounts include gains or losses associated with sales of properties held by Eloigne.
|
Public Utility Regulation
|
Regulatory Body / RTO
|
|
Additional Information
|
MPUC (a)
|
|
Retail rates, services, security issuances, property transfers, mergers, disposition of assets, affiliate transactions, and other aspects of electric and natural gas operations.
Reviews and approves IRPs for meeting future energy needs.
Certifies the need and siting for generating plants greater than 50 MW and transmission lines greater than 100 KV in Minnesota.
Reviews and approves natural gas supply plans.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
NDPSC (a)
|
|
Retail rates, services and other aspects of electric and natural gas operations.
Regulatory authority over generation and transmission facilities, along with the siting and routing of new generation and transmission facilities in North Dakota.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
SDPUC
|
|
Retail rates, services and other aspects of electric operations.
Regulatory authority over generation and transmission facilities, along with the siting and routing of new generation and transmission facilities in South Dakota.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
FERC
|
|
Wholesale electric operations, hydroelectric licensing, accounting practices, wholesale sales for resale, transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, compliance with NERC electric reliability standards, asset transfers and mergers, and natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.
|
MISO
|
|
NSP-Minnesota is a transmission owning member of the MISO RTO and operates within the MISO RTO and wholesale markets. NSP-Minnesota makes wholesale sales in other RTO markets at market-based rates. NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin also make wholesale electric sales at market-based prices to customers outside of their balancing authority as jointly authorized by the FERC.
|
DOT
|
|
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
Minnesota Office of Pipeline Safety
|
|
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
(a)
|
Jurisdictional Cost Recovery Allocation — In December 2016, NSP-Minnesota filed a resource treatment framework with the NDPSC and MPUC to allow NSP-Minnesota’s operations in North Dakota and Minnesota to gradually become more independent of one another. The filing identified two options: a legal separation, creating a separate North Dakota operating company; or a pseudo-separation, which maintains the current corporate structure but directly assigns costs and benefits of each resource to the jurisdiction that supports it. Docket remains under consideration by the NDPSC.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Additional Information
|
CIP Rider (a)
|
|
Recovers costs of conservation and DSM programs.
|
EIR
|
|
Recovers costs of environmental improvement projects.
|
RDF
|
|
Allocates money collected from customers to support research and development of emerging renewable energy projects and technologies.
|
RES
|
|
Recovers cost of renewable generation in Minnesota.
|
RER
|
|
Recovers the cost of renewable generation in North Dakota.
|
SEP
|
|
Recovers costs related to various energy policies approved by the Minnesota legislature.
|
TCR
|
|
Recovers costs for investments in electric transmission and distribution grid modernization.
|
Infrastructure Rider
|
|
Recovers costs for investments in generation and incremental property taxes in South Dakota.
|
FCA (b)
|
|
Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota include a FCA for monthly billing adjustments to recover changes in prudently incurred costs of fuel related items and purchased energy. Capacity costs are recovered through base rates and are not recovered through the FCA. MISO costs are generally recovered through either the FCA or base rates.
|
PGA
|
|
Provides for prospective monthly rate adjustments for costs of purchased natural gas, transportation and storage service. Includes a true-up process for difference between projected and actuals costs.
|
GUIC Rider
|
|
Recovers costs for transmission and distribution pipeline integrity management programs, including: funding for pipeline assessments, deferred costs for sewer separation and pipeline integrity management programs.
|
(a)
|
Minnesota state law requires NSP-Minnesota to invest 2% of its state electric revenues and 0.5% of its state gas revenues in CIP. These costs are recovered through an annual cost-recovery mechanism.
|
(b)
|
In 2017, the MPUC changed the FCA process in Minnesota, which will implemented in 2020. Under the new process, each month utilities would collect amounts equal to the baseline cost of energy set at the start of the plan year (base would be reset annually). Monthly variations to the baseline costs would be tracked and netted over a 12-month period. Utilities would issue refunds above the baseline costs and could seek recovery of any overage.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
MPUC
|
||||||||||
2018 TCR
|
|
Electric
|
|
$98
|
|
November 2017
|
|
Received
|
|
In November 2019, the MPUC issued an order setting an ROE of 9.06% and recovery of 2017-2018 expenses related to advanced grid investments.
|
2020 TCR
|
|
Electric
|
|
$82
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 TCR Rider. The filing included an ROE of 9.06%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2019 GUIC
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$29
|
|
November 2018
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2018, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2019 GUIC Rider with the MPUC. The filing included an ROE of 10.25%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2020 GUIC
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$21
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 GUIC Rider with the MPUC. The filing included an ROE of 9.04%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2018 RES
|
|
Electric
|
|
$23
|
|
November 2017
|
|
Received
|
|
In November 2019, the MPUC approved an order setting an ROE of 9.06%.
|
2020 RES
|
|
Electric
|
|
$102
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 RES Rider with the MPUC. The requested amount includes a true up for the 2019 rider of $38 million and the 2020 requested amount of $64 million. The filing included an ROE of 9.06%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
•
|
Extends the life of the Monticello nuclear plant from 2030 to 2040;
|
•
|
Continues to run PI through current end of life (2033 and 2034);
|
•
|
Includes the MEC acquisition and construction of the Sherco combined cycle natural gas plant;
|
•
|
Includes the early retirement of the King coal plant (511 MW) in 2028 and the Sherco 3 coal plant (517 MW) in 2030;
|
•
|
Adds approximately 1,700 MW of firm peaking (combustion turbine, pumped hydro, battery storage, demand response, etc.);
|
•
|
Adds approximately 1,200 MW of wind replacement; and
|
•
|
Adds approximately 4,000 MW of solar.
|
Regulatory Body / RTO
|
|
Additional Information
|
PSCW
|
|
Retail rates, services and other aspects of electric and natural gas operations.
Certifies the need for new generating plants and electric transmission lines before the facilities may be sited and built.
The PSCW has a biennial base rate filing requirement. By June of each odd numbered year, NSP-Wisconsin must submit a rate filing for the test year beginning the following January.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
MPSC
|
|
Retail rates, services and other aspects of electric and natural gas operations.
Certifies the need for new generating plants and electric transmission lines before the facilities may be sited and built.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
FERC
|
|
Wholesale electric operations, hydroelectric generation licensing, accounting practices, wholesale sales for resale, transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, compliance with NERC electric reliability standards, asset transactions and mergers and natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.
|
MISO
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin is a transmission owning member of the MISO RTO that operates within the MISO RTO and wholesale energy market. NSP-Wisconsin and NSP-Minnesota are jointly authorized by the FERC to make wholesale electric sales at market-based prices.
|
DOT
|
|
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Additional Information
|
Annual Fuel Cost Plan (a)
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin does not have an automatic electric fuel adjustment clause. Under Wisconsin rules, utilities submit a forward-looking annual fuel cost plan to the PSCW. Once the PSCW approves the plan, utilities defer the amount of any fuel cost under-recovery or over-recovery in excess of a 2% annual tolerance band, for future rate recovery or refund. Approval of a fuel cost plan and any rate adjustment for refund or recovery of deferred costs is determined by the PSCW. Rate recovery of deferred fuel cost is subject to an earnings test based on the most recently authorized ROE. Under-collections that exceed the 2% annual tolerance band may not be recovered if the utility earnings for that year exceed the authorized ROE.
|
Power Supply Cost Recovery Factors
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin’s retail electric rate schedules for Michigan customers include power supply cost recovery factors, based on 12-month projections. After each 12-month period, a reconciliation is submitted whereby over-recoveries are refunded and any under-recoveries are collected from customers.
|
Wisconsin Energy Efficiency Program
|
|
The primary energy efficiency program is funded by the utilities, but operated by independent contractors subject to oversight by the PSCW and utilities. NSP-Wisconsin recovers these costs from customers.
|
PGA
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin has a retail PGA cost-recovery mechanism for Wisconsin to recover the actual cost of natural gas and transportation and storage services.
|
Natural Gas Cost-Recovery Factor (MI)
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin’s natural gas rates for Michigan customers include a natural gas cost-recovery factor, based on 12-month projections and trued-up to actual amounts on an annual basis.
|
(a)
|
NSP-Wisconsin’s electric fuel costs were lower than authorized in rates and outside the 2% annual tolerance band in 2019. Under the fuel cost recovery rules, NSP-Wisconsin retained the $3.3 million of over-recovered fuel costs (amounts within annual tolerance band) and deferred $9.7 million (amounts in excess of annual tolerance band) as a regulatory liability. NSP-Wisconsin plans to file a reconciliation of 2019 fuel costs with the PSCW by March 2020.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
PSCW
|
||||||||||
Rate Case
|
|
Electric & Natural Gas
|
|
N/A
|
|
May 2019
|
|
Received
|
|
In May 2019, NSP-Wisconsin filed an application with the PSCW seeking no change to base electric rates through Dec. 31, 2021; and a $3.2 million (4.6%) decrease to base natural gas rates, effective Jan. 1, 2020, and no additional changes to base natural gas rates through Dec. 31, 2021. The settlement is based on an ROE of 10.0% and an equity ratio of 52.5%. In September 2019, the PSCW issued an interim order approving the settlement agreement as filed with one minor modification, to remove the deferral of pension settlement accounting costs for 2021. A final order was received in December 2019.
|
Regulatory Body / RTO
|
|
Additional Information
|
CPUC
|
|
Retail rates, accounts, services, issuance of securities and other aspects of electric and natural gas operations.
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
FERC
|
|
Wholesale electric operations, accounting practices, hydroelectric licensing, wholesale sales for resale, transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, compliance with the NERC electric reliability standards, asset transactions and mergers and natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.
Wholesale electric sales at cost-based prices to customers inside PSCo’s balancing authority area and at market-based prices to customers outside PSCo’s balancing authority area.
PSCo holds a FERC certificate that allows it to transport natural gas in interstate commerce without PSCo becoming subject to full FERC jurisdiction.
|
RTO
|
|
PSCo is not presently a member of an RTO and does not operate within an RTO energy market. However, PSCo does make certain sales to other RTO’s, including SPP and participates in a joint dispatch agreement with neighboring utilities.
|
DOT
|
|
Pipeline safety compliance.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Additional Information
|
ECA
|
|
Recovers fuel and purchased energy costs. Short-term sales margins are shared with customers through the ECA. The ECA is revised quarterly.
|
PCCA
|
|
Recovers purchased capacity payments.
|
SCA
|
|
Recovers difference between actual fuel costs and costs recovered under steam service rates. The SCA rate is revised quarterly.
|
DSMCA
|
|
Recovers DSM, interruptible service costs and performance initiatives for achieving energy savings goals.
|
RESA
|
|
Recovers the incremental costs of compliance with the RES with a maximum of 2% of the customer’s bill.
|
WCA
|
|
Recovers costs for customers who choose renewable resources.
|
TCA
|
|
Recovers costs for transmission investment outside of rate cases.
|
CACJA
|
|
Recovers costs associated with the CACJA.
|
FCA
|
|
PSCo recovers fuel and purchased energy costs from wholesale electric customers through a fuel cost adjustment clause approved by the FERC. Wholesale customers pay production costs through a forecasted formula rate subject to true-up.
|
GCA
|
|
Recovers costs of purchased natural gas and transportation and is revised quarterly to allow for changes in natural gas rates.
|
PSIA
|
|
Recovers costs for transmission and distribution pipeline integrity management programs.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
CPUC
|
||||||||||
Rate Case
|
|
Steam
|
|
$7
|
|
January 2019
|
|
Received
|
|
In September 2019, the CPUC approved PSCo’s Settlement Agreement with CPUC Staff and the City of Denver. The settlement reflects an ROE of 9.67% for AFUDC purposes, an equity ratio of 56.04% and utilization of tax reform benefits. The first stepped increase went into effect Oct. 1, 2019, with full rates effective Oct. 1, 2020.
|
Rate Case Appeal
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
N/A
|
|
April 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In April 2019, PSCo filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the CPUC’s prior ruling regarding PSCo’s last natural gas rate case (approved in December 2018). Appeal requests review of the following: denial of a return on the prepaid pension and retiree medical assets; the use of a capital structure that is not based on the actual historical test year level; and the use of an average rate base methodology rather than a year-end rate base methodology. Timeline on a final ruling is unknown.
|
DSM Incentive
|
|
Electric & Natural Gas
|
|
$12
|
|
April 2019
|
|
Received
|
|
PSCo earned an electric and natural gas DSM incentive of $9 million and $3 million, respectively, for achieving its 2018 savings goals.
|
Revenue Request (Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
||
Company filed rebuttal
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
ROE
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
Impact of change in test year
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Property tax expense
|
|
15
|
|
|
Rate base adjustments
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
Capital structure
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Total proposed revenue change
|
|
280
|
|
|
Estimated impact of previously authorized costs (existing riders)
|
|
245
|
|
|
Net revenue change
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Revenue Request (Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
||
Capital additions (through Sept. 30, 2019)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Forecasted capital additions (through Sept. 30, 2020)
|
|
33
|
|
|
Sales growth (includes amounts forecasted through Sept. 30, 2020)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
Operations and maintenance, amortization and other expenses
|
|
29
|
|
|
Property tax expense
|
|
19
|
|
|
Cost of capital
|
|
8
|
|
|
Updated depreciation rates
|
|
5
|
|
|
Net increase to revenue
|
|
127
|
|
|
Previously authorized costs:
|
|
|
||
Transfer PSIA rider costs to base rates
|
|
18
|
|
|
Total base request
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expected year-end rate base
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
|
Total Capacity
|
|
PSCo's Ownership
|
|
Wind generation
|
1,100 MW
|
|
500 MW
|
|
Solar generation
|
700 MW
|
|
—
|
|
Battery storage
|
275 MW
|
|
—
|
|
Natural gas generation
|
380 MW
|
|
380 MW
|
|
Regulatory Body / RTO
|
|
Additional Information
|
PUCT
|
|
Retail electric operations, rates, services, construction of transmission or generation and other aspects of SPS’ electric operations.
The municipalities in which SPS operates in Texas have original jurisdiction over rates in those communities. The municipalities’ rate setting decisions are subject to PUCT review.
|
NMPRC
|
|
Retail electric operations, retail rates and services and the construction of transmission or generation.
|
FERC
|
|
Wholesale electric operations, accounting practices, wholesale sales for resale, the transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, compliance with NERC electric reliability standards, asset transactions and mergers, and natural gas transactions in interstate commerce.
|
SPP RTO and SPP IM Wholesale Market
|
|
SPS is a transmission-owning member of the SPP RTO and operates within the SPP RTO and SPP IM wholesale market. SPS is authorized to make wholesale electric sales at market-based prices.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Additional Information
|
DCRF
|
|
Recovers distribution costs not included in rates in Texas.
|
EECRF
|
|
Recovers costs for energy efficiency programs in Texas.
|
Energy Efficiency Rider
|
|
Recovers costs for energy efficiency programs in New Mexico.
|
FPPCAC
|
|
Adjusts monthly to recover actual fuel and purchased power costs in New Mexico. In October 2019, SPS filed an application to the NMPRC to approve SPS’ continued use of its FPPCAC and for reconciliation of fuel costs for the period Sept. 1, 2015, through June 30, 2019, which will determine whether all fuel costs incurred are eligible for recovery. No procedural schedule has yet been established for this matter.
|
PCRF
|
|
Allows recovery of purchased power costs not included in Texas rates.
|
RPS
|
|
Recovers deferred costs for renewable energy programs in New Mexico.
|
TCRF
|
|
Recovers certain transmission infrastructure improvement costs and changes in wholesale transmission charges not included in Texas base rates.
|
Fixed Fuel and Purchased Recovery Factor
|
|
Provides for the over- or under-recovery of energy expenses. Regulations require refunding or surcharging over- or under- recovery amounts, including interest, when they exceed 4% of the utility’s annual fuel and purchased energy costs on a rolling 12-month basis, if this condition is expected to continue.
|
Wholesale Fuel and Purchased Energy Cost Adjustment
|
|
SPS recovers fuel and purchased energy costs from its wholesale customers through a monthly wholesale fuel and purchased energy cost adjustment clause accepted by the FERC. Wholesale customers also pay the jurisdictional allocation of production costs.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
SPS (NMPRC)
|
||||||||||
Rate Case
|
|
Electric
|
|
$51
|
|
July 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In July 2019, SPS filed an electric rate case with the NMPRC seeking an increase in retail electric base rates of approximately $51 million. The rate request is based on an ROE of 10.35%, an equity ratio of 54.77%, a rate base of approximately $1.3 billion and a historic test year with rate base additions through Aug. 31, 2019. In December 2019, SPS revised its base rate increase request to approximately $47 million, based on an ROE of 10.10% and updated information. The request also included an increase of $14.6 million for accelerated depreciation including the early retirement of the Tolk Coal Plant in 2032.
On Jan. 13, 2020, SPS and various parties filed an uncontested comprehensive stipulation. The stipulation includes a base rate revenue increase of $31 million, based on an ROE of 9.45% and an equity ratio of 54.77%. The stipulation also includes an acceleration of depreciation on the Tolk Coal Plant to reflect early retirement in 2037, which results in a total increase in depreciation expense of $8 million. The Signatories will not oppose the full application of depreciation rates associated with the 2032 retirement date in SPS’ next base rate case. SPS anticipates final rates will go into effect in the second or third quarter of 2020.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Staff
|
|
AXM
|
|
OPUC
|
|
TIEC
|
|
DOE
|
||||||||||
SPS Direct Testimony
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Recommended base rate adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
ROE
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|||||
Capital structure
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||
Tolk/Harrington O&M disallowance
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Distribution and Transmission Capital Disallowances (a)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Depreciation expense
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Excess ADIT unprotected plant
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Income Tax Expense Differences
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Other, net
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Total Adjustments
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|||||
Total proposed revenue change
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Recommended Position
|
|
Staff
|
|
AXM
|
|
OPUC (b)
|
|
TIEC
|
|
DOE
|
|||||
ROE
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Equity Ratio
|
|
51.00
|
%
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
51.00
|
%
|
|
53.00
|
%
|
(a)
|
Staff recommends exclusion of approximately $134 million in transmission, distribution, and general plant in service in this rate case resulting in an approximate $7 million decrease to the revenue requirement.
|
(b)
|
OPUC did not provide a recommendation for an ROE or equity ratio. For illustrative purposes an ROE of 9.5% was used.
|
•
|
Rebuttal testimony — March 11, 2020; and
|
•
|
Public hearing begins — March 30, 2020
|
•
|
New and revised environmental regulations;
|
•
|
Impacts of variability due to participation in the SPP;
|
•
|
Customer expectations;
|
•
|
Technological advances;
|
•
|
Groundwater aquifer depletion at SPS’s Tolk Station;
|
•
|
Aging generation fleet;
|
•
|
Load growth and gas price variability;
|
•
|
Changes to tax credits and incentives; and
|
•
|
Changes to renewable portfolio standard acquisitions.
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
|
|
|
Pension Costs
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
+1%
|
|
-1%
|
||||
Rate of return
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Discount rate (a)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
9
|
|
(a)
|
These costs include the effects of regulation.
|
|
|
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation
|
|
Service and Interest Components
|
||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
+1%
|
|
-1%
|
|
+1%
|
|
-1%
|
Health care cost trend
|
|
$51
|
|
$(43)
|
|
$2
|
|
$(2)
|
•
|
$150 million in January 2020;
|
•
|
$154 million in 2019;
|
•
|
$150 million in 2018; and
|
•
|
$162 million in 2017.
|
•
|
NSP-Minnesota recognizes pension expense in all regulatory jurisdictions using the aggregate normal cost actuarial method. Differences between aggregate normal cost and expense as calculated by pension accounting standards are deferred as a regulatory liability;
|
•
|
In 2018, the PSCW approved NSP-Wisconsin’s request for deferred accounting treatment of the 2018 pension settlement accounting expense;
|
•
|
Regulatory Commissions in Colorado, Texas, New Mexico and FERC jurisdictions allow the recovery of other postretirement benefit costs only to the extent that recognized expense is matched by cash contributions to an irrevocable trust. Xcel Energy has consistently funded at a level to allow full recovery of costs in these jurisdictions;
|
•
|
PSCo and SPS recognize pension expense in all regulatory jurisdictions based on expense consistent with accounting guidance. The Texas and Colorado electric retail jurisdictions and the Colorado gas retail jurisdiction, each record the difference between annual recognized pension expense and the annual amount of pension expense approved in their last respective general rate case as a deferral to a regulatory asset; and
|
•
|
In 2018, PSCo was required to create a regulatory liability to adjust postretirement health care costs to zero in order to match the amounts collected in rates in the Colorado Gas retail jurisdiction.
|
Derivatives, Risk Management and Market Risk
|
|
Futures / Forwards Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Less Than
1 Year
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
4 to 5 Years
|
|
Greater Than
5 Years
|
|
Total
Fair Value
|
||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota (a)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
NSP-Minnesota (b)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|||||
PSCo (b)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
(a)
|
Prices actively quoted or based on actively quoted prices.
|
(b)
|
Prices based on models and other valuation methods.
|
|
Options Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Less Than
1 Year
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
4 to 5 Years
|
|
Greater Than
5 Years
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota (a)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
(a)
|
Prices based on models and other valuation methods.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Fair value of commodity trading net contract assets outstanding at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Contracts realized or settled during the period
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
||
Commodity trading contract additions and changes during the period
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
11
|
|
||
Fair value of commodity trading net contract assets outstanding at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31
|
|
VaR Limit
|
|
Average
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
||||||||||
2019
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
2018
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
3,263
|
|
|
$
|
3,122
|
|
|
$
|
3,126
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(4,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,296
|
)
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
3 to 5 Years
|
|
After 5 Years
|
||||||||||
Long-term debt, principal and interest payments
|
$
|
31,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
$
|
2,702
|
|
|
$
|
2,514
|
|
|
$
|
24,795
|
|
|
Finance lease obligations
|
271
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
207
|
|
||||||
Operating leases obligations (a)
|
2,116
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
865
|
|
||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations (b)
|
5,831
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
||||||
Other long-term obligations, including current portion
|
680
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
468
|
|
||||||
Other short-term obligations
|
442
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Short-term debt
|
595
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Total contractual cash obligations
|
$
|
41,368
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
5,277
|
|
|
$
|
4,244
|
|
|
$
|
27,746
|
|
(a)
|
Included in operating lease obligations are $236 million, $463 million, $422 million and $750 million, for the less than 1 year, 1 - 3 years, 3 - 5 years and after 5 years categories, respectively, pertaining to PPAs that were accounted for as operating leases.
|
(b)
|
Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries have contracts providing for the purchase and delivery of a significant portion of its fuel (nuclear, natural gas and coal) requirements. Additionally, the utility subsidiaries of Xcel Energy Inc. have entered into non-lease purchase power agreements. Certain contractual purchase obligations are adjusted on indices. Effects of price changes are mitigated through cost of energy adjustment mechanisms.
|
|
|
Capital Forecast
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
2024
|
|
2020 - 2024 Total
|
||||||||||||
By Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
2,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,580
|
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
8,920
|
|
PSCo
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
||||||
SPS
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
3,805
|
|
||||||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
250
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
||||||
Other (a)
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
||||||
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
4,630
|
|
|
$
|
3,810
|
|
|
$
|
4,445
|
|
|
$
|
4,475
|
|
|
$
|
4,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,970
|
|
(a)
|
Other category includes intercompany transfers for safe harbor wind turbines. The $650M non-regulated acquisition of MEC in 2020 is not included above.
|
|
|
Capital Forecast
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
2024
|
|
2020 - 2024 Total
|
||||||||||||
By Function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Renewables
|
|
$
|
1,760
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,075
|
|
Electric generation
|
|
480
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
||||||
Electric transmission
|
|
625
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
||||||
Electric distribution
|
|
885
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
6,260
|
|
||||||
Natural gas
|
|
520
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
||||||
Other
|
|
360
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
||||||
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
4,630
|
|
|
$
|
3,810
|
|
|
$
|
4,445
|
|
|
$
|
4,475
|
|
|
$
|
4,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,970
|
|
•
|
Projected cash generation;
|
•
|
Projected capital investment;
|
•
|
A reasonable rate of return on shareholder investment; and
|
•
|
The impact on Xcel Energy’s capital structure and credit ratings.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Fair value of pension assets
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
Projected pension obligation (a)
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
||
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735
|
)
|
(a)
|
Excludes non-qualified plan of $39 million and $33 million at Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
Pension Assumptions
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||
Discount rate
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
Expected long-term rate of return
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
•
|
$1.25 billion for Xcel Energy Inc.;
|
•
|
$700 million for PSCo;
|
•
|
$500 million for NSP-Minnesota;
|
•
|
$500 million for SPS; and
|
•
|
$150 million for NSP-Wisconsin.
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
||
Borrowing limit
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
595
|
|
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
663
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding
|
|
945
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
2.34
|
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
||||||
Borrowing limit
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
595
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
814
|
|
|||
Average amount outstanding
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
644
|
|
|||
Maximum amount outstanding
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|||
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|||
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Facility
|
|
Drawn (a)
|
|
Available
|
|
Cash
|
|
Liquidity
|
||||||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
759
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
PSCo
|
|
700
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
652
|
|
|||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
500
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
491
|
|
|||||
SPS
|
|
500
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
378
|
|
|||||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
150
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
88
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
3,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
(a)
|
Includes outstanding commercial paper, term loan borrowings and letters of credit.
|
•
|
Xcel Energy Inc. — approximately $700 million of senior unsecured bonds and approximately $75 to $80 million of equity through the DRIP and benefit programs;
|
•
|
NSP-Minnesota — approximately $550 million of first mortgage bonds;
|
•
|
NSP-Wisconsin — approximately $100 million of first mortgage bonds
|
•
|
PSCo — approximately $750 million of first mortgage bonds; and
|
•
|
SPS — approximately $300 million of first mortgage bonds.
|
•
|
Constructive outcomes in all rate case and regulatory proceedings.
|
•
|
Normal weather patterns.
|
•
|
Weather-normalized retail electric sales are projected to increase ~1%, including impact of leap year.
|
•
|
Weather-normalized retail firm natural gas sales are projected to increase ~1%, including impact of leap year.
|
•
|
Capital rider revenue is projected to increase $45 million to $55 million (net of PTCs). PTCs are credited to customers, through capital riders and reductions to electric margin.
|
•
|
O&M expenses are projected to increase approximately 1% to 2%.
|
•
|
Depreciation expense is projected to increase approximately $160 million to $170 million.
|
•
|
Property taxes are projected to increase approximately $35 million to $45 million.
|
•
|
Interest expense (net of AFUDC — debt) is projected to increase $50 million to $60 million.
|
•
|
AFUDC — equity is projected to increase approximately $10 million to $20 million.
|
•
|
The ETR is projected to be approximately 0%. The ETR reflects benefits of PTCs which are credited to customers through electric margin and will not impact net income.
|
(a)
|
Ongoing earnings is calculated using net income and adjusting for certain nonrecurring or infrequent items that are, in management’s view, not reflective of ongoing operations. Ongoing earnings could differ from those prepared in accordance with GAAP for unplanned and/or unknown adjustments. Xcel Energy is unable to forecast if any of these items will occur or provide a quantitative reconciliation of the guidance for ongoing EPS to corresponding GAAP EPS.
|
ITEM 7A — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
ITEM 8 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
|
Robert C. Frenzel
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Feb. 21, 2020
|
|
|
Feb. 21, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of (1) the recovery in future rates of costs deferred as regulatory assets, and (2) a refund or a future reduction in rates that should be reported as regulatory liabilities. We also tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the recognition of regulatory assets or liabilities and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates or of a future reduction in rates.
|
•
|
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
|
•
|
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions for the Company, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by intervenors, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedence of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We also evaluated regulatory filings for any evidence that intervenors are challenging full recovery of the cost of any capital projects. If the full recovery of project costs is being challenged by intervenors, we evaluated management’s assessment of the probability of a disallowance. We evaluated the external information and compared to the Company’s recorded regulatory assets and liabilities for completeness.
|
•
|
We obtained management’s analysis and correspondence from counsel, as appropriate, regarding regulatory assets or liabilities not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery or a future reduction in rates.
|
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
February 21, 2020
|
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
|
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
•
|
Certain costs, which would otherwise be charged to expense or other comprehensive income, are deferred as regulatory assets based on the expected ability to recover the costs in future rates; and
|
•
|
Certain credits, which would otherwise be reflected as income or other comprehensive income, are deferred as regulatory liabilities based on the expectation the amounts will be returned to customers in future rates, or because the amounts were collected in rates prior to the costs being incurred.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
Fuel
|
|
191
|
|
|
170
|
|
||
Natural gas
|
|
83
|
|
|
107
|
|
||
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
2. Accounting Pronouncements
|
3. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric plant
|
|
$
|
44,355
|
|
|
$
|
41,472
|
|
Natural gas plant
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
6,210
|
|
||
Common and other property
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
||
Plant to be retired (a)
|
|
259
|
|
|
322
|
|
||
CWIP
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
||
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
55,844
|
|
|
52,249
|
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
(16,735
|
)
|
|
(15,659
|
)
|
||
Nuclear fuel
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
||
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
(2,535
|
)
|
|
(2,417
|
)
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
39,483
|
|
|
$
|
36,944
|
|
(a)
|
In 2018, the CPUC approved early retirement of PSCo’s Comanche Units 1 and 2 in approximately 2022 and 2025, respectively. PSCo also expects Craig Unit 1 to be retired early in 2025. Amounts are presented net of accumulated depreciation.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Plant in Service
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
CWIP
|
|
Percent Owned
|
|||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Electric generation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sherco Unit 3
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Sherco common facilities
|
|
145
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
80
|
|
|||
Sherco substation
|
|
5
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
59
|
|
|||
Electric transmission:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CapX2020
|
|
972
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
51
|
|
|||
Grand Meadow
|
|
11
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|||
Total NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Plant in Service
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
CWIP
|
|
Percent Owned
|
|||||||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Electric transmission:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
La Crosse, WI to Madison, WI
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
CapX2020
|
|
169
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
80
|
|
|||
Total NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Plant in Service
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
CWIP
|
|
Percent Owned
|
|||||||
PSCo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Electric generation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Hayden Unit 1
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
Hayden Unit 2
|
|
149
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
|
|||
Hayden common facilities
|
|
41
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53
|
|
|||
Craig Units 1 and 2
|
|
81
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
|||
Craig common facilities
|
|
39
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
Comanche Unit 3
|
|
887
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
67
|
|
|||
Comanche common facilities
|
|
29
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
82
|
|
|||
Electric transmission:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Transmission and other facilities
|
|
174
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|||
Gas transmission:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rifle, CO to Avon, CO
|
|
22
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
60
|
|
|||
Gas transmission compressor
|
|
9
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50
|
|
|||
Total PSCo
|
|
$
|
1,583
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
4. Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
See Note(s)
|
|
Remaining
Amortization Period |
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
|||||||||||||
Regulatory Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
Current
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|||||||||
Pension and retiree medical obligations
|
|
11
|
|
|
Various
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
1,328
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
Recoverable deferred taxes on AFUDC recorded in plant
|
|
|
|
Plant lives
|
|
—
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
264
|
|
|||||
Net AROs (a)
|
|
1, 12
|
|
|
Plant lives
|
|
—
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
452
|
|
||||
Excess deferred taxes — TCJA
|
|
7
|
|
|
Various
|
|
39
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
296
|
|
||||
Depreciation differences
|
|
|
|
One to twelve years
|
|
15
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
107
|
|
|||||
Environmental remediation costs
|
|
1, 12
|
|
|
Various
|
|
36
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
155
|
|
||||
Benson biomass PPA termination and asset purchase
|
|
|
|
Ten years
|
|
9
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
86
|
|
|||||
Contract valuation adjustments (b)
|
|
1, 10
|
|
|
Term of related contract
|
|
20
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
77
|
|
||||
Purchased power contract costs
|
|
|
|
Term of related contract
|
|
5
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
63
|
|
|||||
Laurentian biomass PPA termination
|
|
|
|
Five years
|
|
19
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
73
|
|
|||||
PI extended power uprate
|
|
|
|
Sixteen years
|
|
3
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
56
|
|
|||||
Losses on reacquired debt
|
|
|
|
Term of related debt
|
|
4
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
44
|
|
|||||
State commission adjustments
|
|
|
|
Plant lives
|
|
1
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
29
|
|
|||||
Property tax
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
2
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
10
|
|
|||||
Conservation programs (c)
|
|
1
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
27
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
28
|
|
||||
Nuclear refueling outage costs
|
|
1
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
43
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
14
|
|
||||
Sales true-up and revenue decoupling
|
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
54
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||||
Renewable resources and environmental initiatives
|
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
72
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
9
|
|
|||||
Gas pipeline inspection and remediation costs
|
|
|
|
One to two years
|
|
26
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
3
|
|
|||||
Deferred purchased natural gas and electric energy costs
|
|
|
|
One to three years
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
13
|
|
|||||
Other
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
22
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
40
|
|
|||||
Total regulatory assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
3,326
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
See Note(s)
|
|
Remaining
Amortization Period |
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||
Regulatory Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
Current
|
|
Noncurrent
|
||||||||
Deferred income tax adjustments and TCJA refunds (a)
|
|
7
|
|
Various
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
Plant removal costs
|
|
1, 12
|
|
Plant lives
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
||||
Effects of regulation on employee benefit costs (b)
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
—
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137
|
|
||||
Renewable resources and environmental initiatives
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
—
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
54
|
|
||||
ITC deferrals (c)
|
|
1
|
|
Various
|
|
—
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
||||
Deferred electric, natural gas and steam production costs
|
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
138
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Contract valuation adjustments (d)
|
|
1, 10
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Conservation programs (e)
|
|
1
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
DOE settlement
|
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
101
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
66
|
|
||||
Total regulatory liabilities (f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
5,077
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
5,187
|
|
(a)
|
Includes the revaluation of recoverable/regulated plant ADIT and revaluation impact of non-plant ADIT due to the TCJA.
|
(b)
|
Includes regulatory amortization and certain 2018 TCJA benefits approved by the CPUC to offset the PSCo prepaid pension asset.
|
(c)
|
Includes impact of lower federal tax rate due to the TCJA.
|
(d)
|
Includes the fair value of certain long-term PPAs used to meet energy capacity requirements and valuation adjustments on natural gas commodity purchases.
|
(e)
|
Includes costs for conservation programs, as well as incentives allowed in certain jurisdictions.
|
(f)
|
Revenue subject to refund of $28 million and $29 million for 2019 and 2018, respectively, is included in other current liabilities.
|
5. Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments
|
(Millions of Dollars, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||
Borrowing limit
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
595
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
814
|
|
||||
Average amount outstanding
|
|
663
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
644
|
|
||||
Maximum amount outstanding
|
|
945
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
||||
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
||||
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Limit
|
|
Amount Used
|
|
Available
|
||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Limit
|
|
Amount Used
|
|
Available
|
||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
•
|
Maturity extended from June 2021 to June 2024;
|
•
|
Borrowing limit for Xcel Energy was increased from $1.0 billion to $1.25 billion;
|
•
|
Borrowing limit for SPS was increased from $400 million to $500 million; and
|
•
|
Added swingline subfacility for Xcel Energy up to $75 million
|
|
|
Debt-to-Total Capitalization Ratio(a)
|
|
Amount Facility May Be Increased (millions)
|
|
Additional Periods for Which a One-Year Extension May Be Requested (b)
|
|||||||
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Xcel Energy Inc. (c)
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
2
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
46
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
PSCo
|
|
44
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
2
|
|
(a)
|
Each credit facility has a financial covenant requiring that the debt-to-total capitalization ratio be less than or equal to 65%.
|
(b)
|
All extension requests are subject to majority bank group approval.
|
(c)
|
The Xcel Energy Inc. credit facility has a cross-default provision that Xcel Energy Inc. will be in default on its borrowings under the facility if it or any of its subsidiaries (except NSP-Wisconsin as long as its total assets do not comprise more than 15% of Xcel Energy’s consolidated total assets) default on indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount exceeding $75 million.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Credit Facility (a)
|
|
Drawn (b)
|
|
Available
|
||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
PSCo
|
|
700
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
691
|
|
|||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
500
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
498
|
|
|||
SPS
|
|
500
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
460
|
|
|||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
150
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
85
|
|
|||
Total
|
|
$
|
3,100
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
(a)
|
These credit facilities mature in June 2024.
|
(b)
|
Includes outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|||||
Unsecured senior notes (d)
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
May 15, 2020
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
March 15, 2021
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
March 15, 2022
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
June 1, 2025
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
June 1, 2025
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
3.35
|
|
|
Dec. 1, 2026
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes (a)
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
June 15, 2028
|
|
130
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes (b)
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
June 15, 2028
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes (a)
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
Dec. 1, 2029
|
|
500
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
July 1, 2036
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
Sept. 15, 2041
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes (a)
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
Dec. 1, 2049
|
|
500
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Elimination of PSCo capital lease obligation with affiliates (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|||
Current maturities (capital lease obligation) (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,947
|
|
|
$
|
3,316
|
|
(a)
|
2019 financing.
|
(b)
|
2018 financing.
|
(c)
|
Xcel Energy adopted ASC 842 on Jan. 1, 2019, which refers to capital leases as finance leases. Under ASC 842, the present value of future finance lease payments is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities rather than debt.
|
(d)
|
Note was redeemed on Dec. 23, 2019.
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|||||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
Aug. 15, 2020
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2022
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
May 15, 2023
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
7.13
|
|
|
July 1, 2025
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
March 1, 2028
|
|
150
|
|
|
150
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
July 15, 2035
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
June 1, 2036
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
July 1, 2037
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
Nov. 1, 2039
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2040
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2042
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
May 15, 2044
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2045
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
May 15, 2046
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
Sept. 15, 2047
|
|
600
|
|
|
600
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (a)
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
March 1, 2050
|
|
600
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|||
Current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,221
|
|
|
$
|
4,937
|
|
(a)
|
2019 financing.
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|||||
City of La Crosse resource recovery bond
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Nov 1, 2021
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
June 15, 2024
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
June 15, 2024
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
Sept. 1, 2038
|
|
200
|
|
|
200
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
Oct. 1, 2042
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
Dec. 1, 2047
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (a)
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
Sept. 1, 2048
|
|
200
|
|
|
200
|
|
||
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
(a)
|
2018 financing.
|
PSCo
|
|||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|||||
First mortgage bonds (d)
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
June 1, 2019
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
Nov. 15, 2020
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
Sept. 15, 2022
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
March 15, 2023
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
May 15, 2025
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (b)
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
June 15, 2028
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
Sept. 1, 2037
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
Aug. 1, 2038
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.75
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2041
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
Sept. 15, 2042
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
March 15, 2043
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
March 15, 2044
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
June 15, 2046
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
June 15, 2047
|
|
400
|
|
|
400
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (b)
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
June 15, 2048
|
|
350
|
|
|
350
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (a)
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
Sept. 15, 2049
|
|
400
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (a)
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
March 1, 2050
|
|
550
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Capital lease obligations (c)
|
|
11.20 - 14.30
|
|
|
2025 - 2060
|
|
—
|
|
|
145
|
|
||
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|||
Current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,985
|
|
|
$
|
4,592
|
|
(a)
|
2019 financing.
|
(b)
|
2018 financing.
|
(c)
|
PSCo adopted ASC 842 on Jan. 1, 2019, which refers to capital leases as finance leases. Under ASC 842, the present value of future finance lease payments is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities rather than debt.
|
(d)
|
Bond was redeemed on March 29, 2019.
|
SPS
|
|||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|||||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.30
|
%
|
|
June 15, 2024
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
June 15, 2024
|
|
200
|
|
|
200
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
Oct. 1, 2033
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
Unsecured senior notes
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
Oct. 1, 2036
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2041
|
|
200
|
|
|
200
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2041
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2041
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2046
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
Aug. 15, 2047
|
|
450
|
|
|
450
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (b)
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
Nov. 15, 2048
|
|
300
|
|
|
300
|
|
||
First mortgage bonds (a)
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
June 15, 2049
|
|
300
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Unamortized debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
|
$
|
2,126
|
|
(a)
|
2019 financing.
|
(b)
|
2018 financing.
|
Other Subsidiaries
|
||||||||||||
Financing Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Various Eloigne affordable housing project notes
|
|
0.00% - 6.90%
|
|
2020 — 2052
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
|
||
2020
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
2021
|
|
421
|
|
|
2022
|
|
900
|
|
|
2023
|
|
650
|
|
|
2024
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Authorized (Shares)
|
|
Par Value of Preferred Stock
|
|
Preferred Stock Outstanding (Shares) 2019 and 2018
|
||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
—
|
|
PSCo
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common Stock Authorized (Shares)
|
|
Par Value of Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock Outstanding (Shares) as of Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Common Stock Outstanding (Shares) as of Dec. 31, 2018
|
|||||
1,000,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
524,539,000
|
|
|
514,036,787
|
|
|
|
Equity to Total
Capitalization Ratio
Required Range
|
|
Equity to Total Capitalization Ratio Actual
|
|||||
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
2019
|
|||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
47.1
|
%
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
SPS (a)
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes short-term debt.
|
(Amounts in Millions)
|
|
Unrestricted Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
Limit on Total Capitalization
|
||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
1,147
|
|
|
$
|
11,634
|
|
|
$
|
12,700
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin (a)
|
|
12
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|||
SPS (b)
|
|
535
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(a)
|
Cannot pay annual dividends in excess of approximately $55 million if its average equity-to-total capitalization ratio falls below the commission authorized level.
|
(b)
|
May not pay a dividend that would cause a loss of its investment grade bond rating.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
Short-Term Debt
|
|
||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
52.93% of total capitalization
|
|
(a)
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
(a)
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(b)
|
150
|
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
—
|
|
(c)
|
600
|
|
|
||
PSCo
|
|
150
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
(a)
|
NSP-Minnesota has authorization to issue long-term securities provided the equity-to-total capitalization remains within the required range, and to issue short-term debt provided it does not exceed 15% of total capitalization.
|
(b)
|
NSP-Wisconsin filed for additional long-term debt authorization in December 2019.
|
(c)
|
SPS filed for additional long-term debt authorization in February 2020.
|
6. Revenues
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Electric
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
Major revenue types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue from contracts with customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
|
$
|
2,877
|
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
4,045
|
|
C&I
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
5,440
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
130
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
134
|
|
||||
Total retail
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
9,619
|
|
||||
Wholesale
|
|
737
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
737
|
|
||||
Transmission
|
|
507
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
507
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
49
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
169
|
|
||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
9,144
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
11,032
|
|
||||
Alternative revenue and other
|
|
431
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
497
|
|
||||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
9,575
|
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
11,529
|
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Electric
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
Major revenue types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue from contracts with customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
|
$
|
2,919
|
|
|
$
|
988
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
3,945
|
|
C&I
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
134
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
140
|
|
||||
Total retail
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
9,508
|
|
||||
Wholesale
|
|
791
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
791
|
|
||||
Transmission
|
|
523
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
523
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
98
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
198
|
|
||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
9,339
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
11,020
|
|
||||
Alternative revenue and other
|
|
380
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
517
|
|
||||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
9,719
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
7. Income Taxes
|
•
|
Corporate federal tax rate reduction from 35% to 21%;
|
•
|
Normalization of resulting plant-related excess deferred taxes;
|
•
|
Elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax;
|
•
|
Continued interest expense deductibility and discontinued bonus depreciation for regulated public utilities;
|
•
|
Limitations on certain executive compensation deductions;
|
•
|
Limitations on certain deductions for NOLs arising after Dec. 31, 2017 (limited to 80% of taxable income);
|
•
|
Repeal of the section 199 manufacturing deduction; and
|
•
|
Reduced deductions for meals and entertainment as well as state and local lobbying.
|
•
|
$2.7 billion ($3.8 billion grossed-up for tax) of reclassifications of plant-related excess deferred taxes to regulatory liabilities upon valuation at the new 21% federal rate. The regulatory liabilities will be amortized consistent with IRS normalization requirements, resulting in customer refunds over an estimated weighted average period of approximately 30 years;
|
•
|
$254 million and $174 million of reclassifications (grossed-up for tax) of excess deferred taxes for non-plant related deferred tax assets and liabilities, respectively, to regulatory assets and liabilities; and
|
•
|
$23 million of total estimated income tax expense related to the tax rate change on certain non-plant deferred taxes and all other 2017 income statement impacts of the federal tax reform.
|
Tax Year(s)
|
|
Expiration
|
2009 - 2013
|
|
June 2020
|
2014 - 2016
|
|
September 2020
|
State
|
|
Year
|
Colorado
|
|
2009
|
Minnesota
|
|
2009
|
Texas
|
|
2009
|
Wisconsin
|
|
2014
|
•
|
In 2018, Wisconsin began an audit of tax years 2014 - 2016. As of Dec. 31, 2019, no material adjustments have been proposed.
|
•
|
Xcel Energy had no other state income tax audits in progress for its major operating jurisdictions as of Dec. 31, 2019.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
||
Total unrecognized tax benefit
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
10
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
6
|
|
|||
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
15
|
|
|||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|||
Settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
NOL and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Federal tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
Valuation allowances for federal credit carryforwards
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
||
State NOL carryforwards
|
|
937
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
||
Valuation allowances for state NOL carryforwards
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(50
|
)
|
||
State tax credit carryforwards, net of federal detriment (a)
|
|
89
|
|
|
89
|
|
||
Valuation allowances for state credit carryforwards, net of federal benefit (b)
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
(69
|
)
|
(a)
|
State tax credit carryforwards are net of federal detriment of $24 million as of Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018.
|
(b)
|
Valuation allowances for state tax credit carryforwards were net of federal benefit of $17 million and $18 million as of Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
2019
|
|
2018 (a)
|
|
2017 (a)
|
|||
Federal statutory rate
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income tax on pretax income, net of federal tax effect
|
4.9
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Wind PTCs
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
Plant regulatory differences (b)
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Other tax credits, net of NOL & tax credit allowances
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Change in unrecognized tax benefits
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Tax reform
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Other, net
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Effective income tax rate
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
(a)
|
Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
|
(b)
|
Regulatory differences for income tax primarily relate to the credit of excess deferred taxes to customers through the average rate assumption method. Income tax benefits associated with the credit of excess deferred credits are offset by corresponding revenue reductions and additional prepaid pension asset amortization.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Current federal tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Current state tax expense (benefit)
|
|
4
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|||
Current change in unrecognized tax expense (benefit)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|||
Deferred federal tax expense
|
|
55
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
460
|
|
|||
Deferred state tax expense
|
|
83
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
107
|
|
|||
Deferred change in unrecognized tax expense
|
|
5
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
73
|
|
|||
Deferred ITCs
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) excluding items below
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
(2,939
|
)
|
Amortization and adjustments to deferred income taxes on income tax regulatory assets and liabilities
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
3,583
|
|
|||
Tax benefit (expense) allocated to other comprehensive income, net of adoption of ASU No. 2018-02, and other
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Deferred tax expense
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
8. Share-Based Compensation
|
•
|
Omnibus Incentive Plan - 7.0 million shares; and
|
•
|
Executive Annual Incentive Award Plan - 1.2 million shares.
|
(Shares in Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Granted shares
|
|
13
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
15
|
|
|||
Grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
53.46
|
|
|
$
|
44.68
|
|
|
$
|
42.00
|
|
(Shares in Thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|||
Nonvested restricted stock at Jan. 1, 2019
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
44.29
|
|
Granted
|
|
13
|
|
|
53.46
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
41.60
|
|
|
Dividend equivalents
|
|
1
|
|
|
57.09
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted stock at Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
31
|
|
|
50.15
|
|
(Units in Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Granted units
|
|
483
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
503
|
|
|||
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
49.67
|
|
|
$
|
47.60
|
|
|
$
|
41.02
|
|
(Units in Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Vested Units
|
|
464
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
467
|
|
|||
Total Fair Value
|
|
$
|
29,432
|
|
|
$
|
23,393
|
|
|
$
|
22,459
|
|
(Units in Thousands)
|
|
Units
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|||
Nonvested Units at Jan. 1, 2019
|
|
939
|
|
|
$
|
44.30
|
|
Granted
|
|
483
|
|
|
49.67
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
50.19
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
41.09
|
|
|
Dividend equivalents
|
|
38
|
|
|
45.22
|
|
|
Nonvested Units at Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
880
|
|
|
48.20
|
|
(Units in Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Granted units
|
|
29
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
51
|
|
|||
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
58.44
|
|
|
$
|
45.44
|
|
|
$
|
46.05
|
|
(Units in Thousands)
|
|
Units
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value |
|||
Stock equivalent units at Jan. 1, 2019
|
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
30.93
|
|
Granted
|
|
29
|
|
|
58.44
|
|
|
Units distributed
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
32.56
|
|
|
Dividend equivalents
|
|
19
|
|
|
57.28
|
|
|
Stock equivalent units at Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
725
|
|
|
32.72
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|||
Awards granted
|
|
225
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
240
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Awards settled
|
|
466
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
454
|
|
|||
Settlement amount (cash, common stock and deferred amounts)
|
|
$
|
24,930
|
|
|
$
|
21,534
|
|
|
$
|
19,083
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Compensation cost for share-based awards (a)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Tax benefit recognized in income
|
|
15
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
22
|
|
(a)
|
Compensation costs for share-based payment are included in O&M expense.
|
9. Earnings Per Share
|
•
|
Equity awards subject to a performance condition; included in common shares outstanding when all necessary conditions for settlement have been satisfied by the end of the reporting period; and
|
•
|
Liability awards subject to a performance condition; any portions settled in shares are included in common shares outstanding upon settlement.
|
10. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
•
|
Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices;
|
•
|
Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts or priced with models using highly observable inputs; and
|
•
|
Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those valued with models requiring significant management judgment or estimation.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear decommissioning fund (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
733
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
935
|
|
||||||
Debt securities
|
|
489
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
508
|
|
||||||
Equity securities
|
|
485
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
964
|
|
||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,740
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet, which also includes $155 million of equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and $136 million of rabbi trust assets and miscellaneous investments.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear decommissioning fund (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
758
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
898
|
|
||||||
Debt securities
|
|
466
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
436
|
|
||||||
Equity securities
|
|
401
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
697
|
|
||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,649
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
2,055
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet, which also includes $141 million of equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and $121 million of rabbi trust assets and miscellaneous investments.
|
|
|
Final Contractual Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Due in 1 Year
or Less
|
|
Due in 1 to 5
Years
|
|
Due in 5 to 10
Years
|
|
Due after 10
Years
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Debt securities
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Rabbi Trusts (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
57
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
65
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Rabbi Trusts (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
52
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet.
|
(Millions of Dollars) (a) (b)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||
MWh of electricity
|
|
95
|
|
|
87
|
|
MMBtu of natural gas
|
|
110
|
|
|
92
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.
|
(b)
|
Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis but weighted for the probability of exercise.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
After-tax net unrealized losses related to derivatives accounted for as hedges
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
After-tax net realized losses on derivative transactions reclassified into earnings
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|||
Adoption of ASU. 2018-02 (a)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow hedges at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
(a)
|
In 2017, Xcel Energy implemented ASU No 2018-02 related to TCJA, which resulted in reclassification of certain credit balances within net accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings.
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Fair Value
Gains (Losses) Recognized
During the Period in:
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
Regulatory
(Assets) and Liabilities |
||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
||
Total
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Total
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
||
Total
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
||
Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Pre-Tax (Gains) Losses
Reclassified into Income
During the Period from:
|
|
Pre-Tax Gains
(Losses) Recognized
During the Period in Income |
|
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
Regulatory
Assets and (Liabilities) |
|
|
|||||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate
|
$
|
4
|
|
(a)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commodity trading
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
(b)
|
|||
Electric commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(c)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Natural gas commodity
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
(d)
|
(7
|
)
|
(d)
|
|||
Total
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate
|
4
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Total
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commodity trading
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
(b)
|
|||
Electric commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(c)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Natural gas commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(d)
|
(4
|
)
|
(d)
|
|||
Total
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
10
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate
|
5
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Total
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commodity trading
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
(b)
|
|||
Electric commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
(c)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Natural gas commodity
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
(d)
|
(6
|
)
|
(d)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts recorded to interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Amounts recorded to electric operating revenues. Portions of these gains and losses are subject to sharing with electric customers through margin-sharing mechanisms and deducted from gross revenue, as appropriate.
|
(c)
|
Amounts recorded to electric fuel and purchased power. These derivative settlement gains and losses are shared with electric customers through fuel and purchased energy cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified out of income as regulatory assets or liabilities, as appropriate.
|
(d)
|
Amounts for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 included no settlement losses on derivatives entered to mitigate natural gas price risk for electric generation recorded to electric fuel and purchased power, subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified to a regulatory asset, as appropriate. Such losses and gains for the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017 were $1 million and immaterial, respectively. Remaining settlement losses for the years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to natural gas operations and were recorded to cost of natural gas sold and transported. These losses are subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified out of income to a regulatory asset, as appropriate.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
||||||||||||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
||||||||||||
Total current derivative assets
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
83
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Total noncurrent derivative assets
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
18
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
4
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
15
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
34
|
|
||||||||||||
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
Total current derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
41
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Total noncurrent derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
36
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
(a)
|
Xcel Energy nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements as of Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018. At both Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018, derivative assets and liabilities included $32 million of obligations to return cash collateral. At Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018, derivative assets and liabilities included rights to reclaim cash collateral of $11 million and $15 million, respectively. Counterparty netting excludes settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.
|
(b)
|
During 2006, Xcel Energy qualified these contracts under the normal purchase exception. Based on this qualification, the contracts are no longer adjusted to fair value and the previous carrying value of these contracts will be amortized over the remaining contract lives along with the offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31
|
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Purchases
|
|
44
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
82
|
|
|||
Settlements
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|||
Net transactions recorded during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
(Losses) gains recognized in earnings (a)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
5
|
|
|||
Net gains (losses) recognized as regulatory assets and liabilities
|
|
3
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
28
|
|
|||
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts relate to commodity derivatives held at the end of the period.
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
18,109
|
|
|
$
|
20,227
|
|
|
$
|
16,209
|
|
|
$
|
16,755
|
|
11. Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
•
|
Investment returns in 2019 were above the assumed level of 6.87%;
|
•
|
Investment returns in 2018 were below the assumed level of 6.87%;
|
•
|
Investment returns in 2017 were above the assumed level of 6.87%; and
|
•
|
In 2020, expected investment-return assumption is 6.87%.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019 (a)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018 (a)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Measured at NAV
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Measured at NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
||||||||||
Debt securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
||||||||||
Equity securities
|
|
86
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
||||||||||
Other
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,519
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,159
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
(a)
|
See Note 10 for further information regarding fair value measurement inputs and methods.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019 (a)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018 (a)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Measured at NAV
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Measured at NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Insurance contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
45
|
|
||||||||||
Commingled funds
|
|
69
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
173
|
|
||||||||||
Debt securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
179
|
|
||||||||||
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
(a)
|
See Note 10 for further information on fair value measurement inputs and methods.
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||||
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Obligation at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
3,828
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
Service cost
|
|
86
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
||||
Interest cost
|
|
145
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
|
||||
Plan amendments
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
273
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
19
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
||||
Plan participants’ contributions
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
||||
Medicare subsidy reimbursements
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||
Benefit payments (a)
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(50
|
)
|
||||
Obligation at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
3,701
|
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
|
$
|
3,088
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
568
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
56
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
||||
Employer contributions
|
|
155
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
11
|
|
||||
Plan participants’ contributions
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
||||
Benefit payments
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(50
|
)
|
||||
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
Funded status of plans at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at Dec. 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
||||
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
(118
|
)
|
||||
Net amounts recognized
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
(a)
|
Includes approximately $20 million in 2019 and $198 million in 2018 of lump-sum benefit payments used in the determination of a settlement charge.
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Discount rate for year-end valuation
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mortality table
|
|
PRI-2012
|
|
|
RP-2014
|
|
|
PRI-2012
|
|
|
RP-2014
|
|
Health care costs trend rate — initial: Pre-65
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Health care costs trend rate — initial: Post-65
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
Ultimate trend assumption — initial: Pre-65
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Ultimate trend assumption — initial: Post-65
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Years until ultimate trend is reached
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||||||||
Service cost
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
145
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
24
|
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
||||||
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
||||||
Amortization of net loss
|
|
87
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
7
|
|
||||||
Settlement charge (a)
|
|
6
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Net periodic pension cost (credit)
|
|
116
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||||||
Costs not recognized due to effects of regulation
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Net benefit cost (credit) recognized for financial reporting
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Significant Assumptions Used to Measure Costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
||||||
Expected average long-term increase in compensation level
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Expected average long-term rate of return on assets
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
(a)
|
A settlement charge is required when the amount of all lump-sum distributions during the year is greater than the sum of the service and interest cost components of the annual net periodic pension cost. In 2019 and 2018, as a result of lump-sum distributions during the 2019 and 2018 plan years, Xcel Energy recorded a total pension settlement charge of $6 million in 2019 and $91 million in 2018, the majority of which was not recognized due to the effects of regulation. A total of $1 million and $11 million was recorded in the consolidated statements of income in 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||||
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
|
$
|
1,447
|
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Amounts Not Yet Recognized as Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Have Been Recorded as Follows Based Upon Expected Recovery in Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Current regulatory assets
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Noncurrent regulatory assets
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
89
|
|
||||
Current regulatory liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Noncurrent regulatory liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
||||
Deferred income taxes
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||
Net-of-tax accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
51
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Measurement date
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
•
|
$150 million in January 2020;
|
•
|
$154 million in 2019;
|
•
|
$150 million in 2018; and
|
•
|
$162 million in 2017.
|
•
|
$10 million during 2020;
|
•
|
$15 million during 2019;
|
•
|
$11 million during 2018; and
|
•
|
$20 million during 2017.
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Domestic and international equity securities
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
Long-duration fixed income securities
|
|
30
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Short-to-intermediate fixed income securities
|
|
14
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
70
|
|
Alternative investments
|
|
17
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
8
|
|
Cash
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Projected
Pension Benefit Payments |
|
Gross Projected
Postretirement Health Care Benefit Payments |
|
Expected
Medicare Part D Subsidies |
|
Net Projected
Postretirement Health Care Benefit Payments |
||||||||
2020
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
2021
|
|
263
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
41
|
|
||||
2022
|
|
262
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
40
|
|
||||
2023
|
|
260
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
39
|
|
||||
2024
|
|
255
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
38
|
|
||||
2025-2029
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
168
|
|
12. Commitments and Contingencies
|
(Millions
of Dollars)
|
|
Jan. 1, 2019
|
|
Amounts
Incurred
(a)
|
|
Amounts
Settled
(b)
|
|
Accretion
|
|
Cash Flow Revisions (c)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
Steam, hydro and other production
|
|
177
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
8
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
202
|
|
||||||
Wind
|
|
119
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
146
|
|
||||||
Distribution
|
|
42
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
44
|
|
||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Transmission and distribution
|
|
249
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
236
|
|
||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
||||||
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||
Non-utility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||
Total liability
|
|
$
|
2,568
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts incurred related to the wind farms placed in service in 2019 for NSP-Minnesota (Lake Benton and Foxtail) and SPS (Hale).
|
(b)
|
Amounts settled related to asbestos abatement projects and closure of certain ash containment facilities.
|
(c)
|
In 2019, AROs were revised for changes in timing and estimates of cash flows. Changes in gas transmission and distribution AROs were primarily related to increased gas line mileage and number of services, which were more than offset by decreased inflation rates. Changes in steam, hydro and other production AROs primarily related to the cost estimates to remediate ponds at production facilities. Changes in wind AROs were driven by new dismantling studies.
|
(Millions
of Dollars)
|
|
Jan. 1, 2018
|
|
Amounts
Incurred
(a)
|
|
Amounts
Settled
(b)
|
|
Accretion
|
|
Cash Flow Revisions (c)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||
Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
Steam, hydro and other production
|
|
192
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
8
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
177
|
|
||||||
Wind
|
|
96
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
119
|
|
||||||
Distribution
|
|
21
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
42
|
|
||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
7
|
|
||||||
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Transmission and distribution
|
|
282
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
249
|
|
||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
||||||
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||
Non-utility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||
Total liability
|
|
$
|
2,475
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,568
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts incurred related to the PSCo Rush Creek wind farm and Nicollet Projects community solar gardens, which were placed in service in 2018.
|
(b)
|
Amounts settled related to asbestos abatement projects and closure of certain ash containment facilities.
|
(c)
|
In 2018, AROs were revised for changes in timing and estimates of cash flows. Changes in gas transmission and distribution AROs were primarily related to increased gas line mileage and number of services, which were more than offset by increased discount rates. Changes in electric distribution AROs primarily related to increased labor costs.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
PSCo
|
|
351
|
|
|
344
|
|
||
SPS
|
|
175
|
|
|
188
|
|
||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
171
|
|
|
158
|
|
||
Total Xcel Energy
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Basis
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Estimated decommissioning cost obligation from most recently approved study (in 2014 dollars)
|
|
$
|
3,012
|
|
|
$
|
3,012
|
|
Effect of escalating costs
|
|
688
|
|
|
539
|
|
||
Estimated decommissioning cost obligation (in current dollars)
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
||
Effect of escalating costs to payment date
|
|
7,505
|
|
|
7,654
|
|
||
Estimated future decommissioning costs (undiscounted)
|
|
11,205
|
|
|
11,205
|
|
||
Effect of discounting obligation (using average risk-free interest rate of 2.39% and 3.33% for 2019 and 2018, respectively)
|
|
(5,562
|
)
|
|
(6,911
|
)
|
||
Discounted decommissioning cost obligation
|
|
$
|
5,643
|
|
|
$
|
4,294
|
|
Assets held in external decommissioning trust
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,055
|
|
Underfunding of external decommissioning fund compared to the discounted decommissioning obligation
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||
Discounted decommissioning cost obligation - regulated basis
|
|
$
|
5,643
|
|
|
$
|
4,294
|
|
Differences in discount rate and market risk premium
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
||
O&M costs not included for GAAP
|
|
(1,280
|
)
|
|
(879
|
)
|
||
Nuclear production decommissioning ARO - GAAP
|
|
$
|
2,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Annual decommissioning recorded as depreciation expense: (a) (b)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
(a)
|
Decommissioning expense does not include depreciation of the capitalized nuclear asset retirement costs.
|
(b)
|
Decommissioning expenses in 2019, 2018 and 2017 include Minnesota’s retail jurisdiction annual funding requirement of approximately $14 million.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||
PPAs
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
Other
|
|
201
|
|
|
Gross operating lease ROU assets
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
Net operating lease ROU assets
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Gas storage facilities
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Gas pipeline
|
|
21
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
Gross finance lease ROU assets
|
|
222
|
|
|
222
|
|
||
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
(77
|
)
|
||
Net finance lease ROU assets
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Operating leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
PPA capacity payments
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Other operating leases (a)
|
|
34
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
36
|
|
|||
Total operating lease expense (b)
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization of ROU assets
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest expense on lease liability
|
|
19
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|||
Total finance lease expense
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
(a)
|
Includes short-term lease expense of $5 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017.
|
(b)
|
PPA capacity payments are included in electric fuel and purchased power on the consolidated statements of income. Expense for other operating leases is included in O&M expense and electric fuel and purchased power.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
|
|
Other Operating
Leases
|
|
Total
Operating
Leases
|
|
Finance
Leases (c)
|
||||||||
2020
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
2021
|
|
238
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
14
|
|
||||
2022
|
|
225
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
12
|
|
||||
2023
|
|
214
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
12
|
|
||||
2024
|
|
208
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
12
|
|
||||
Thereafter
|
|
750
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
207
|
|
||||
Total minimum obligation
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
271
|
|
||||
Interest component of obligation
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
(190
|
)
|
||||
Present value of minimum obligation
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
81
|
|
|||
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||||||
Noncurrent operating and finance lease liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,549
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Weighted-average remaining lease term in years
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts and/or contingent payments, such as energy payments on renewable PPAs.
|
(b)
|
PPA operating leases contractually expire at various dates through 2033.
|
(c)
|
Excludes certain amounts related to Xcel Energy’s 50% ownership interest in WYCO.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
|
|
Other Operating
Leases
|
|
Total
Operating
Leases
|
|
Finance Leases (c)
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
2020
|
|
208
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
14
|
|
||||
2021
|
|
210
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
14
|
|
||||
2022
|
|
197
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
12
|
|
||||
2023
|
|
186
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
12
|
|
||||
Thereafter
|
|
883
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
220
|
|
||||
Total minimum obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
||||
Interest component of obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|||||||
Present value of minimum obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts and/or contingent payments, such as energy payments on renewable PPAs.
|
(b)
|
PPA operating leases contractually expire at various dates through 2033.
|
(c)
|
Excludes certain amounts related to Xcel Energy’s 50% ownership interest in WYCO.
|
(a)
|
Excludes contingent energy payments for renewable energy PPAs.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Coal
|
|
Nuclear fuel
|
|
Natural gas supply
|
|
Natural gas supply and transportation
|
||||||||
2020
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
2021
|
|
222
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
283
|
|
||||
2022
|
|
135
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
269
|
|
||||
2023
|
|
58
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
198
|
|
||||
2024
|
|
24
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
153
|
|
||||
Thereafter
|
|
74
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
860
|
|
||||
Total
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||
Current assets
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
||
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
Total assets
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Mortgages and other long-term debt payable
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
IBM Agreement
|
|
Accenture Agreement
|
|
Cognizant Agreement
|
||||||
2020
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
2021
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
2022
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|||
2023
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
2024
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
Thereafter
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
13. Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
2019
|
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Gains and
Losses on Cash Flow Hedges |
|
Defined Benefit
Pension and Postretirement Items |
|
Total
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (net of taxes of $(8) and $0, respectively)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|||
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate derivatives (net of taxes of $1 and $0, respectively)
|
|
3
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|||
Amortization of net actuarial loss (net of taxes of $0 and $1, respectively)
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
(b)
|
3
|
|
|||
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
(a)
|
Included in interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs. See Note 11 for further information.
|
|
|
2018
|
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Gains and
Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
Defined Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement
Items
|
|
Total
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (net of taxes of $(2) and $(2), respectively)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|||
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate derivatives (net of taxes of $1 and $0, respectively)
|
|
3
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|||
Amortization of net actuarial loss (net of taxes of $0 and $3, respectively)
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
(b)
|
9
|
|
|||
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
(a)
|
Included in interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs. See Note 11 for further information.
|
14. Segments and Related Information
|
•
|
Regulated Electric - The regulated electric utility segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Texas and New Mexico. In addition, this segment includes sales for resale and provides wholesale transmission service to various entities in the United States. The regulated electric utility segment also includes wholesale commodity and trading operations; and
|
•
|
Regulated Natural Gas - The regulated natural gas utility segment transports, stores and distributes natural gas primarily in portions of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Michigan and Colorado.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Regulated Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
9,575
|
|
|
$
|
9,719
|
|
|
$
|
9,676
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
9,576
|
|
|
$
|
9,720
|
|
|
$
|
9,678
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|||
Interest charges and financing costs
|
|
500
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
449
|
|
|||
Income tax expense
|
|
125
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
528
|
|
|||
Net income
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|||
Regulated Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,870
|
|
|
$
|
1,741
|
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
219
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
174
|
|
|||
Interest charges and financing costs
|
|
69
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
57
|
|
|||
Income tax expense
|
|
48
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
23
|
|
|||
Net income
|
|
195
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
182
|
|
|||
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total operating revenue
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
11
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
Interest charges and financing costs
|
|
167
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
122
|
|
|||
Income tax (benefit)
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|||
Net (loss)
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Consolidated Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
11,532
|
|
|
$
|
11,540
|
|
|
$
|
11,407
|
|
Reconciling eliminations
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Consolidated total revenue
|
|
$
|
11,529
|
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
|
$
|
11,404
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|||
Interest charges and financing costs
|
|
736
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
628
|
|
|||
Income tax expense
|
|
128
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
542
|
|
|||
Net income
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
15. Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
Sept. 30, 2019
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
3,141
|
|
|
$
|
2,577
|
|
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
|
$
|
2,798
|
|
Operating income
|
|
486
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
450
|
|
||||
Net income
|
|
315
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
292
|
|
||||
EPS total — basic
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
EPS total — diluted
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
||||
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||
(Amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|
March 31, 2018
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
Sept. 30, 2018
|
|
Dec. 31, 2018
|
||||||||
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
2,951
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
$
|
3,048
|
|
|
$
|
2,880
|
|
Operating income (a)
|
|
480
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
339
|
|
||||
Net income
|
|
291
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
214
|
|
||||
EPS total — basic
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
EPS total — diluted
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
||||
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
0.380
|
|
|
0.380
|
|
|
0.380
|
|
|
0.380
|
|
(a)
|
In 2018, Xcel Energy implemented ASU No. 2017-07 related to net periodic benefit cost, which resulted in retrospective reclassification of pension costs from O&M expense to other income.
|
ITEM 9 — CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
ITEM 9A — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
ITEM 9B — OTHER INFORMATION
|
ITEM 10 — DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
ITEM 11 — EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
ITEM 12 — SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
ITEM 13 — CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
ITEM 14 — PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
ITEM 15 — EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
1
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|||
|
Management Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting — For the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.
|
|||
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Financial Statements
|
|||
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
|
|||
|
Consolidated Statements of Income — For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
|
|||
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
|
|||
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
|
|||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets — As of Dec. 31, 2019 and 2018.
|
|||
|
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity — For the three years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
|
|||
|
|
|||
2
|
Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.
|
|||
|
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended Dec. 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
|
|||
|
|
|||
3
|
Exhibits
|
|||
*
|
Indicates incorporation by reference
|
|||
+
|
Executive Compensation Arrangements and Benefit Plans Covering Executive Officers and Directors
|
|||
|
|
|||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
||||
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Report or Registration Statement
|
SEC File or Registration Number
|
Exhibit Reference
|
3.01*
|
Xcel Energy Inc Form 8-K dated May 16, 2012
|
001-03034
|
3.01
|
|
3.02*
|
Xcel Energy Inc Form 8-K dated Feb. 17, 2016
|
001-03034
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
|
||
4.02*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Dec. 14, 2000
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.03*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 6, 2006
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.04*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Jan. 16, 2008
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.05*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Jan. 16, 2008
|
001-03034
|
4.03
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated May 10, 2010
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
||
4.07*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Sept. 12, 2011
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.08*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 1, 2015
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.09*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated March 8, 2016
|
001-03034
|
4.02
|
|
4.10*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Dec. 1, 2016
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.11*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 25, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
4.12*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Nov. 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008
|
001-03034
|
10.02
|
||
10.02*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008
|
001-03034
|
10.05
|
|
10.03*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008
|
001-03034
|
10.08
|
|
10.04*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form U5B dated Nov. 16, 2000
|
001-03034
|
H-1
|
|
10.05*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008
|
001-03034
|
10.17
|
|
10.06*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
001-03034
|
10.06
|
10.07*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2009
|
001-03034
|
10.08
|
|
10.08*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement dated April 6, 2010
|
001-03034
|
Appendix A
|
|
10.09*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement dated April 5, 2011
|
001-03034
|
Appendix A
|
|
10.10*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008
|
001-03034
|
10.07
|
|
10.11*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2011
|
001-03034
|
10.17
|
|
10.12*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2011
|
001-03034
|
10.18
|
|
10.13*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
|
10.14*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013
|
001-03034
|
10.02
|
|
10.15*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013
|
001-03034
|
10.22
|
|
10.16*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated May 20, 2015
|
001-03034
|
10.02
|
|
10.17*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
|
10.18*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
|
10.19*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
|
001-03034
|
10.1
|
|
10.20*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
001-03034
|
10.30
|
|
10.21*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Nov. 7, 2018
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Dec. 4, 2018
|
001-03034
|
99.01
|
||
10.24*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
001-03034
|
10.34
|
|
10.25*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
001-03034
|
10.35
|
|
10.26*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
001-03034
|
10.36
|
|
10.27*+
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
99.01
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Oct. 30, 2019
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Oct. 30, 2019
|
001-03034
|
10.02
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Dec. 3, 2019
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
||||
4.13*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form S-3 dated April 18, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4(b)(3)
|
|
4.14*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
001-03034
|
4.11
|
|
4.15*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017
|
001-03034
|
4.12
|
|
4.16*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 10-12G dated Oct. 5, 2000
|
000-31709
|
4.51
|
|
4.17*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form S-3 dated April 18, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4(b)(7)
|
4.18*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 10-12G dated Oct. 5, 2000
|
000-31709
|
4.63
|
|
4.19*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated July 14, 2005
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.20*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated May 18, 2006
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.21*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated June 19, 2007
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.22*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Nov. 16, 2009
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.23*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Aug. 4, 2010
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.24*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Aug. 13, 2012
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.25*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated May 20, 2013
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.26*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated May 13, 2014
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.27*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Aug. 11, 2015
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.28*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated May 31, 2016
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.29*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Sept. 13, 2017
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
4.30*
|
NSP-Minnesota Form 8-K dated Sept. 10, 2019
|
001-31387
|
4.01
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form S-4 dated Jan. 21, 2004
|
333-112033
|
10.01
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
99.02
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
||||
4.31*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form S-3 dated April 18, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4(c)(3)
|
|
4.32*
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form 8-K dated Sept. 25, 2000
|
001-03140
|
4.01
|
|
4.33*
|
Xcel Energy Inc Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2003
|
001-03034
|
4.05
|
|
4.34*
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form 8-K dated Sept. 3, 2008
|
001-03140
|
4.01
|
|
4.35*
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form 8-K dated Oct. 10, 2012
|
001-03140
|
4.01
|
|
4.36*
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form 8-K dated June 23, 2014
|
001-03140
|
4.01
|
|
4.37*
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form 8-K dated Dec. 4, 2017
|
001-03140
|
4.01
|
|
4.38*
|
NSP-Wisconsin to Form 8-K dated Sept. 12, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin Form S-4 dated Jan. 21, 2004
|
333-112033
|
10.01
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
99.05
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
PSCo
|
||||
4.39*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form S-3 dated April 18, 2018
|
001-03034
|
4(d)(3)
|
|
4.40*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated July 13, 1999
|
001-03280
|
4.1
4.2
|
|
4.41*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated Aug. 8, 2007
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.42*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated Aug. 6, 2008
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.43*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated May 28, 2009
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.44*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated Nov. 8, 2010
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.45*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated Aug. 9, 2011
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.46*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated Sept. 11, 2012
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.47*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated March 26, 2013
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.48*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated March 10, 2014
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.49*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated May 12, 2015
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.50*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated June 13, 2016
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.51*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated June 19, 2017
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.52*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated June 21, 2018
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.53*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated March 13, 2019
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
4.54*
|
PSCo Form 8-K dated August 13, 2019
|
001-03280
|
4.01
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated Dec. 3, 2004
|
001-03034
|
99.02
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
99.03
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
SPS
|
||||
4.55*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Feb. 25, 1999
|
001-03789
|
99.2
|
|
4.56*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2003
|
001-03034
|
4.04
|
|
4.57*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Oct. 3, 2006
|
001-03789
|
4.01
|
|
4.58*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Aug. 10, 2011
|
001-03789
|
4.01
|
|
4.59*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Aug. 10, 2011
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
|
4.60*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated June 9, 2014
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
|
4.61*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Aug. 12, 2016
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
|
4.62*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Aug 9. 2017
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
|
4.63*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated Nov. 5, 2018
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
4.64*
|
SPS Form 8-K dated June 18, 2019
|
001-03789
|
4.02
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated June 7, 2019
|
001-03034
|
99.04
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
||||
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
|
|||
101.SCH
|
XBRL Schema
|
|||
101.CAL
|
XBRL Calculation
|
|||
101.DEF
|
XBRL Definition
|
|||
101.LAB
|
XBRL Label
|
|||
101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation
|
|||
104
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
XCEL ENERGY INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended Dec. 31
|
||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
||||||
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries
|
$
|
1,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
Total income
|
1,505
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|||
Expenses and other deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating expenses
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
30
|
|
|||
Other income
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|||
Interest charges and financing costs
|
173
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
128
|
|
|||
Total expenses and other deductions
|
187
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
152
|
|
|||
Income before income taxes
|
1,318
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|||
Income tax benefit
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|||
Net income
|
$
|
1,372
|
|
|
$
|
1,261
|
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Pension and retiree medical benefits, net of tax of $1, $1 and $3, respectively
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Derivative instruments, net of tax of $(7), $(1) and $2, respectively
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(17
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,262
|
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic
|
519
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
509
|
|
|||
Diluted
|
520
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
509
|
|
|||
Earnings per average common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
$
|
2.47
|
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
Diluted
|
2.64
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|||
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
Guarantee
Amount
|
|
Current
Exposure
|
|
Triggering
Event
|
|||
Guarantee of loan for Hiawatha Collegiate High School (a)
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(c)
|
Guarantee performance and payment of surety bonds for Xcel Energy Inc.’s utility subsidiaries (b)
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
(d)
|
(a)
|
The term of this guarantee expires the earlier of 2024 or full repayment of the loan.
|
(b)
|
The surety bonds primarily relate to workers compensation benefits and utility projects. The workers compensation bonds are renewed annually and the project based bonds expire in conjunction with the completion of the related projects.
|
(c)
|
Nonperformance and/or nonpayment.
|
(d)
|
Per the indemnity agreement between Xcel Energy Inc. and the various surety companies, surety companies have the discretion to demand that collateral be posted.
|
(e)
|
Due to the magnitude of projects associated with the surety bonds, the total current exposure of this indemnification cannot be determined. Xcel Energy Inc. believes the exposure to be significantly less than the total amount of the outstanding bonds.
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
||||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
PSCo
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
SPS
|
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Xcel Energy Services Inc.
|
|
112
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Xcel Energy Ventures Inc.
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Other subsidiaries of Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
||
Loan outstanding at period end
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Average loan outstanding
|
|
35
|
|
|
Maximum loan outstanding
|
|
125
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
Money pool interest income
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2017 |
||||||
Loan outstanding at period end
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Average loan outstanding
|
|
47
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
38
|
|
|||
Maximum loan outstanding
|
|
250
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
226
|
|
|||
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|||
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|||
Money pool interest income
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
Allowance for bad debts
|
|
NOL and tax credit valuation allowances
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||||
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
Additions charged to costs and expenses
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
||||||
Additions charged to other accounts
|
|
16
|
|
(a)
|
11
|
|
(a)
|
10
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
(c)
|
||||||
Deductions from reserves
|
|
(58
|
)
|
(b)
|
(50
|
)
|
(b)
|
(48
|
)
|
(b)
|
(21
|
)
|
(e)
|
(5
|
)
|
(e)
|
(12
|
)
|
(d)
|
||||||
Balance at Dec. 31
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
(a)
|
Recovery of amounts previously written off.
|
(b)
|
Deductions related primarily to bad debt write-offs.
|
(c)
|
Accrual of valuation allowances for North Dakota ITC, net of federal income tax benefit, that is offset to a regulatory liability and includes $14 million expense related to the revaluation of federal benefit as a result of the TCJA.
|
(d)
|
Primarily the reductions to valuation allowances for North Dakota ITC carryforwards, net of federal benefit, primarily due to a consolidated adjustment to the regulatory liability accrual referenced above; the change includes $4 million of reduced expense related to the revaluation of federal benefit as a result of TCJA.
|
(e)
|
Primarily the reductions to valuation allowances due to additional NOLs and tax credits now forecasted to be used prior to expiration.
|
ITEM 16 — FORM 10-K SUMMARY
|
|
|
XCEL ENERGY INC.
|
|
|
|
Feb. 21, 2020
|
By:
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL
|
|
|
Robert C. Frenzel
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
•
|
approved by (i) a majority of the voting power of all our shares entitled to vote including all shares held by the acquirer and (ii) a majority of the voting power for all of our shares entitled to vote excluding all interested shares; or
|
•
|
acquired in a transaction that (i) is pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer for all of our voting shares, (ii) results in the acquirer becoming the owner of at least a majority of our outstanding voting shares, and (iii) has been approved by a committee of disinterested directors.
|
Vesting Date
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
[Month, date, year]
|
[#]
|
Type
|
Performance Period
|
Performance Share Units
(at Target)
|
[TSR]1
|
[Performance Period]
|
[#]
|
[Environmental]2
|
[Performance Period]
|
[#]
|
(i)
|
during the Period of Restriction applicable to your Restricted Stock Unit Award, you will be eligible to have a pro rata portion of such Award vest on the applicable Vesting Date, such pro rata portion to be equal to the number of Units that would otherwise vest on the Vesting Date had you not retired, multiplied by a fraction whose numerator is the number of whole months during which you were actively employed with Xcel Energy during such Period of Restriction and whose denominator is the length of the Performance Period, expressed as a number of months.
|
(ii)
|
during any Performance Period applicable to your Performance Share Units, you will be eligible to have a pro rata portion of such Award vest on the applicable Vesting Date, such pro rata portion to be equal to the number of Units that would otherwise vest in accordance with the terms of the applicable Exhibit had you not retired, multiplied by a fraction whose numerator is the number of whole months during which you were actively employed with Xcel Energy during such Performance Period and whose denominator is the length of the Performance Period, expressed as a number of months.
|
(iii)
|
For purposes of this Award, “Retirement” means any termination of your employment with Xcel Energy, other than for Cause, occurring at or after age 55 with 10 years or more of continuous service to Xcel Energy.
|
Xcel Energy’s [_______ Percent Reductions in Carbon Dioxide Emissions]
|
Earned Percentage of Target Environmental PSUs
|
Less than [__]%
|
0%
|
[__]% (Threshold)
|
[__]% (Threshold)
|
[__]% (Target)
|
[___]% (Target)
|
[__]% or greater
|
[___]%
|
SUBSIDIARY (a)
|
|
STATE OF INCORPORATION
|
|
PURPOSE
|
Northern States Power Company (a Minnesota corporation)
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Electric and gas utility
|
Northern States Power Company (a Wisconsin corporation)
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
Electric and gas utility
|
Public Service Company of Colorado
|
|
Colorado
|
|
Electric and gas utility
|
Southwestern Public Service Company
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
Electric utility
|
WestGas InterState, Inc.
|
|
Colorado
|
|
Natural gas transmission company
|
Xcel Energy Wholesale Group Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries providing wholesale energy
|
Xcel Energy Markets Holdings Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries providing energy marketing services
|
Xcel Energy International Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Intermediate holding company for international subsidiaries
|
Xcel Energy Ventures Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries developing new businesses
|
Xcel Energy Retail Holdings Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries providing services to retail customers
|
Xcel Energy Communications Group Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries providing telecommunications and related services
|
Xcel Energy WYCO Inc.
|
|
Colorado
|
|
Intermediate holding company holding investment in WYCO
|
Xcel Energy Services Inc.
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Service company for Xcel Energy system
|
Xcel Energy Transmission Holding Company, LLC
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries developing and providing energy transmission services
|
Xcel Energy Venture Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company holding investment in Energy Impact Fund
|
Nicollet Project Holdings, LLC
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company holding investment in MEC Holdings LLC, Nicollet Projects I, LLC and Nicollet Projects II, LLC
|
Nicollet Holdings Company, LLC
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Intermediate holding company for subsidiaries procuring equipment for renewable generation facilities at other subsidiaries
|
(a)
|
Certain insignificant subsidiaries are omitted.
|
•
|
No. 333-222157 (relating to the Xcel Energy Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan)
|
•
|
No. 333-185610 (relating to the Nuclear Management Company, LLC NMC Savings and Retirement Plan)
|
•
|
No. 333-229949 (relating to the Xcel Energy 401(k) Savings Plan; and New Century Energies, Inc. Employees’ Savings and Stock Ownership plan for Bargaining Unit Employees and Former Non-Bargaining Unit Employees; New Century Energies, Inc. Employee Investment Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees and Former Non-Bargaining Unit Employees; and Nuclear Management Company, LLC NMC Savings and Retirement Plan)
|
•
|
No. 333-213382 (relating to the Xcel Energy 401(k) Savings Plan; and New Century Energies, Inc. Employees’ Savings and Stock Ownership plan for Bargaining Unit Employees and Former Non-Bargaining Unit Employees; New Century Energies, Inc. Employee Investment Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees and Former Non-Bargaining Unit Employees)
|
•
|
No. 333-115754 and 333-175189 (relating to Stock Equivalent Plan for Non-Employee Directors)
|
•
|
No. 333-204325 (relating to the Xcel Energy 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan)
|
•
|
No. 333-224333 (relating to senior debt securities, junior subordinated debt securities and common stock)
|
•
|
No. 333-234111 (relating to the Xcel Energy Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan)
|
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
February 21, 2020
|
|
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
/s/ LYNN CASEY
|
|
|
Lynn Casey
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ RICHARD K. DAVIS
|
|
|
Richard K. Davis
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ RICHARD T. O'BRIEN
|
|
|
Richard T. O’Brien
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ DAVID K. OWENS
|
|
|
David K. Owens
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ CHRISTOPHER J POLICINSKI
|
|
|
Christopher J. Policinski
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ JAMES PROKOPANKO
|
|
|
James Prokopanko
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ A. PATRICIA SAMPSON
|
|
|
A. Patricia Sampson
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ JAMES J. SHEPPARD
|
|
|
James J. Sheppard
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ DAVID A. WESTERLUND
|
|
|
David A. Westerlund
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ KIM WILLIAMS
|
|
|
Kim Williams
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ TIMOTHY V. WOLF
|
|
|
Timothy V. Wolf
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ DANIEL YOHANNES
|
|
|
Daniel Yohannes
|
|
|
Director
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Xcel Energy Inc. (a Minnesota corporation);
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
a.
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
b.
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
c.
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
d.
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
a.
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
b.
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Xcel Energy Inc. (a Minnesota corporation);
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
a.
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
b.
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
c.
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
d.
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
a.
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
b.
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL
|
|
Robert C. Frenzel
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
(1)
|
The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
(2)
|
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Xcel Energy as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-K.
|
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL
|
|
Robert C. Frenzel
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|