|
☒
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
001-3034
|
|
41-0448030
|
||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
414 Nicollet Mall
|
Minneapolis
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
|
55401
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
612
|
330-5500
|
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
N/A
|
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
|
Title of each class
|
|
Trading Symbol
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
XEL
|
|
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
|
Large accelerated filer
|
☒
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
|
Class
|
|
April 30, 2020
|
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
525,170,820 shares
|
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1 —
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Item 2 —
|
|||
Item 3 —
|
|||
Item 4 —
|
|||
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1 —
|
|||
Item 1A —
|
|||
Item 2 —
|
|||
Item 6 —
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc.’s Subsidiaries and Affiliates (current and former)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation
|
NSP System
|
The electric production and transmission system of NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin operated on an integrated basis and managed by NSP-Minnesota
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
|
PSCo
|
Public Service Company of Colorado
|
SPS
|
Southwestern Public Service Co.
|
Utility subsidiaries
|
NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo and SPS
|
WGI
|
West Gas Interstate
|
Xcel Energy
|
Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries
|
Federal and State Regulatory Agencies
|
|
CPUC
|
Colorado Public Utilities Commission
|
D.C. Circuit
|
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
|
DOC
|
Department of Commerce
|
DOE
|
Department of Energy
|
EPA
|
United States Environmental Protection Agency
|
FERC
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
|
IRS
|
Internal Revenue Service
|
MPUC
|
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
|
NMPRC
|
New Mexico Public Regulation Commission
|
NRC
|
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
|
OAG
|
Minnesota Office of the Attorney General
|
PSCW
|
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
|
PUCT
|
Public Utility Commission of Texas
|
SEC
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Other
|
|
AFUDC
|
Allowance for funds used during construction
|
ASC
|
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
|
AXM
|
Alliance of Xcel Municipalities
|
C&I
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
CC
|
Combined cycle
|
CCR
|
Coal combustion residual
|
CCR Rule
|
Final rule (40 CFR 257.50 - 257.107) published by the EPA regulating the management, storage and disposal of CCRs as a nonhazardous waste
|
CDD
|
Cooling degree-days
|
CEO
|
Chief executive officer
|
CFO
|
Chief financial officer
|
COVID-19
|
Novel coronavirus
|
CT
|
Combustion turbine
|
CWIP
|
Construction work in progress
|
DR
|
Demand response
|
DRIP
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Program
|
EPS
|
Earnings per share
|
ETR
|
Effective tax rate
|
FASB
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board
|
FTR
|
Financial transmission right
|
GAAP
|
Generally accepted accounting principles
|
GE
|
General Electric
|
HDD
|
Heating degree-days
|
IPP
|
Independent power producing entity
|
LLC
|
Limited liability company
|
MDL
|
Multi district litigation
|
MEC
|
Mankato Energy Center
|
MGP
|
Manufactured gas plant
|
MISO
|
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
|
NAV
|
Net asset value
|
NOI
|
Notice of inquiry
|
NOL
|
Net operating loss
|
O&M
|
Operating and maintenance
|
OATT
|
Open Access Transmission Tariff
|
OPUC
|
Office of Public Utility Counsel
|
PPA
|
Power purchase agreement
|
PTC
|
Production tax credit
|
ROE
|
Return on equity
|
ROFR
|
Right-of-first refusal
|
ROU
|
Right-of-use
|
RTO
|
Regional Transmission Organization
|
SMMPA
|
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency
|
SPP
|
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
|
THI
|
Temperature-humidity index
|
TIEC
|
Texas Industrial Energy Consumers
|
TOs
|
Transmission owners
|
VIE
|
Variable interest entity
|
Measurements
|
|
KV
|
Kilovolts
|
MMBtu
|
Million British thermal Units
|
MW
|
Megawatts
|
MWh
|
Megawatt hours
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
2. Accounting Pronouncements
|
3. Selected Balance Sheet Data
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
Less allowance for bad debts
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)
|
||
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
Fuel
|
|
170
|
|
|
191
|
|
||
Natural gas
|
|
35
|
|
|
83
|
|
||
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric plant
|
|
$
|
44,544
|
|
|
$
|
44,355
|
|
Natural gas plant
|
|
6,653
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
||
Common and other property
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
||
Plant to be retired (a)
|
|
217
|
|
|
259
|
|
||
CWIP
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
||
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
57,161
|
|
|
55,844
|
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
(16,730
|
)
|
|
(16,735
|
)
|
||
Nuclear fuel
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
||
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
(2,535
|
)
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
40,776
|
|
|
$
|
39,483
|
|
(a)
|
In 2018, the CPUC approved early retirement of PSCo’s Comanche Units 1 and 2 in approximately 2022 and 2025, respectively. PSCo also expects Craig Unit 1 to be retired early in 2025. Amounts are presented net of accumulated depreciation.
|
4. Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2019 |
||||
Borrowing limit
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
595
|
|
||
Average amount outstanding
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
||
Maximum amount outstanding
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
||
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
||
Weighted average interest rate at period end
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Credit Facility (a)
|
|
Outstanding (b)
|
|
Available
|
||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
PSCo
|
|
700
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
692
|
|
|||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
500
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
490
|
|
|||
SPS
|
|
500
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
458
|
|
|||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
150
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
74
|
|
|||
Total
|
|
$
|
3,100
|
|
|
$
|
585
|
|
|
$
|
2,515
|
|
(a)
|
Expires in June 2024.
|
(b)
|
Includes outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Limit
|
|
Amount Used
|
|
Available
|
||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Limit
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
Available
|
||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
5. Revenues
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Electric
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
Major revenue types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue from contracts with customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
C&I
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
|
||||
Total retail
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
||||
Wholesale
|
|
166
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
166
|
|
||||
Transmission
|
|
132
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
132
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
17
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
49
|
|
||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
||||
Alternative revenue and other
|
|
117
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
137
|
|
||||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
$
|
583
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Electric
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total
|
||||||||
Major revenue types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue from contracts with customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
1,231
|
|
C&I
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
33
|
|
||||
Total retail
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
||||
Wholesale
|
|
189
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
189
|
|
||||
Transmission
|
|
131
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
131
|
|
||||
Other
|
|
18
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
52
|
|
||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
||||
Alternative revenue and other
|
|
88
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
101
|
|
||||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
3,141
|
|
6. Income Taxes
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||
Federal statutory rate
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
State tax (net of federal tax effect)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Decreases in tax from:
|
|
|
|
|
||
Wind PTCs
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
Plant regulatory differences (a)
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
Other tax credits, net NOL & tax credit allowances
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Other (net)
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
(a)
|
Regulatory differences for income tax primarily relate to the credit of excess deferred taxes to customers through the average rate assumption method. Income tax benefits associated with the credit of excess deferred credits are offset by corresponding revenue reductions.
|
Tax Years
|
|
Expiration
|
2009 - 2013
|
|
September 2020
|
2014 - 2016
|
|
June 2021
|
State
|
|
Year
|
Colorado
|
|
2009
|
Minnesota
|
|
2009
|
Texas
|
|
2009
|
Wisconsin
|
|
2014
|
•
|
In 2018, Wisconsin began an audit of tax years 2014 - 2016. As of March 31, 2020, no material adjustments have been proposed.
|
•
|
No other state income tax audits were in progress as of March 31, 2020.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions
|
|
10
|
|
|
9
|
|
||
Total unrecognized tax benefit
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||
NOL and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
7. Earnings Per Share
|
•
|
Equity awards subject to a performance condition; included in common shares outstanding when all necessary conditions for settlement have been satisfied by the end of the reporting period; and
|
•
|
Liability awards subject to a performance condition; any portions settled in shares are included in common shares outstanding upon settlement.
|
8. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
•
|
Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices;
|
•
|
Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs; and
|
•
|
Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those valued with models requiring significant management judgment or estimation.
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear decommissioning fund (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
756
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
843
|
|
||||||
Debt securities
|
|
514
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
501
|
|
||||||
Equity securities
|
|
435
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
727
|
|
||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,776
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
|
$
|
2,142
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet, which also includes $158 million of equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and $129 million of rabbi trust assets and miscellaneous investments.
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
NAV
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Nuclear decommissioning fund (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
733
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
935
|
|
||||||
Debt securities
|
|
489
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
508
|
|
||||||
Equity securities
|
|
485
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
964
|
|
||||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,740
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
(a)
|
Reported in nuclear decommissioning fund and other investments on the consolidated balance sheet, which also includes $155 million of equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and $136 million of rabbi trust assets and miscellaneous investments.
|
|
|
Final Contractual Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Due in 1 Year
or Less
|
|
Due in 1 to 5
Years
|
|
Due in 5 to 10
Years
|
|
Due after 10
Years
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Debt securities
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Rabbi Trusts (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
57
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
56
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Rabbi Trusts (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
57
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
65
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
(Amounts in Millions) (a)(b)
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||
MWh of electricity
|
|
79
|
|
|
95
|
|
MMBtu of natural gas
|
|
149
|
|
|
110
|
|
(a)
|
Not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.
|
(b)
|
Notional amounts for options included on a gross basis but weighted for the probability of exercise.
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Fair Value
Gains (Losses) Recognized
During the Period in:
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
Regulatory
(Assets) and Liabilities |
||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Total
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
||
Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
Pre-Tax (Gains) Losses
Reclassified into Income
During the Period from:
|
|
Pre-Tax Gains
(Losses) Recognized
During the Period in Income |
|
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
Regulatory
Assets and (Liabilities) |
|
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate
|
$
|
2
|
|
(a)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commodity trading
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
(b)
|
|||
Electric commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(c)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Natural gas commodity
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
(d)
|
(6
|
)
|
(d)
|
|||
Total
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate
|
1
|
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Total
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Other derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commodity trading
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
(b)
|
|||
Electric commodity
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
(c)
|
—
|
|
|
|||
Natural gas commodity
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(d)
|
(3
|
)
|
(d)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
Recorded to interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Recorded to electric operating revenues. Portions of these gains and losses are subject to sharing with electric customers through margin-sharing mechanisms and deducted from gross revenue, as appropriate.
|
(c)
|
Recorded to electric fuel and purchased power. These derivative settlement gains and losses are shared with electric customers through fuel and purchased energy cost-recovery mechanisms, and reclassified out of income as regulatory assets or liabilities, as appropriate.
|
(d)
|
Amounts for both the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 included no settlement gains or losses on derivatives entered to mitigate natural gas price risk for electric generation recorded to electric fuel and purchased power, subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified to a regulatory asset, as appropriate. Remaining settlement losses for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 related to natural gas operations and were recorded to cost of natural gas sold and transported. These gains and losses are subject to cost-recovery mechanisms and reclassified out of income to a regulatory asset or liability, as appropriate.
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
20
|
|
||||||||||||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
||||||||||||
Total current derivative assets
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
52
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
Total noncurrent derivative assets
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
9
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value Total
|
|
Netting (a)
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Electric commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
Natural gas commodity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
||||||||||||
Total current derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
20
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity trading
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Total noncurrent derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
100
|
|
||
PPAs (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
(a)
|
Xcel Energy nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at March 31, 2020 and Dec. 31, 2019. At both March 31, 2020 and Dec. 31, 2019, derivative assets and liabilities include $32 million of obligations to return cash collateral and rights to reclaim cash collateral of $6 million and $11 million, respectively. Counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.
|
(b)
|
During 2006, Xcel Energy qualified these contracts under the normal purchase exception. Based on this qualification, contracts are no longer adjusted to fair value and the previous carrying value of these contracts is being amortized over the remaining contract lives along with the offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Balance at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Purchases
|
|
12
|
|
|
4
|
|
||
Settlements
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
||
Net transactions recorded during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gains (losses) recognized in earnings (a)
|
|
6
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
||
Net gains (losses) recognized as regulatory assets and liabilities
|
|
1
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
||
Balance at March 31
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
(a)
|
Amounts relate to commodity derivatives held at the end of the period.
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
18,112
|
|
|
$
|
19,864
|
|
|
$
|
18,109
|
|
|
$
|
20,227
|
|
9. Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Health
Care Benefits |
||||||||||||
Service cost
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Interest cost (a)
|
|
31
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
||||
Expected return on plan assets (a)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
||||
Amortization of prior service credit (a)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Amortization of net loss (a)
|
|
25
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Credits not recognized due to effects of regulation
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
Net benefit cost (credit) recognized for financial reporting
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
(a)
|
Components of net periodic cost other than the service cost component are included in the line item “other (expense) income, net” in the consolidated statement of income or capitalized on the consolidated balance sheet as a regulatory asset.
|
10. Commitments and Contingencies
|
11. Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Gains and Losses
on Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension and
Postretirement Items
|
|
Total
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (net of taxes of $(3) and $0, respectively)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|||
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate derivatives (net of taxes of $0) (a)
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|||
Amortization of net actuarial loss (net of taxes of $0) (b)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
(a)
|
Included in interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Gains and Losses
on Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension and
Postretirement Items
|
|
Total
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) gain before reclassifications (net of taxes of $(2) and $1, respectively)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest rate derivatives (net of taxes of $0) (a)
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Amortization of net actuarial loss (net of taxes of $0) (b)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
(a)
|
Included in interest charges.
|
(b)
|
Included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs.
|
12. Segment Information
|
•
|
Regulated Electric — The regulated electric utility segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Texas and New Mexico. In addition, this segment includes sales for resale and provides wholesale transmission service to various entities in the United States. The regulated electric utility segment also includes wholesale commodity and trading operations; and
|
•
|
Regulated Natural Gas — The regulated natural gas utility segment transports, stores and distributes natural gas primarily in portions of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Michigan and Colorado.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Regulated Electric
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
Net income
|
|
227
|
|
|
234
|
|
||
Regulated Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
583
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
583
|
|
|
$
|
795
|
|
Net income
|
|
91
|
|
|
105
|
|
||
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total operating revenue
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Net loss
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated Total
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
3,142
|
|
Reconciling eliminations
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
Consolidated total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
3,141
|
|
Net income
|
|
295
|
|
|
315
|
|
ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
PSCo
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
||
SPS
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
||
Regulated utility (a)
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. and Other
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
||
Total (a)
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS — 2019
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
|
||
Components of change — 2020 vs. 2019
|
|
|
||
Higher depreciation and amortization
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
Lower electric and natural gas margins
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
Higher interest
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Lower ETR (a)
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
Lower O&M
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
Lower other (expense) income, net (b)
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS — 2020
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
(a)
|
Includes PTCs and timing of tax reform regulatory decisions, which are primarily offset in electric margin.
|
(b)
|
Decrease is primarily due to the performance of rabbi trust investments associated with deferred compensation, which is offset in O&M.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||||||
|
2020 vs.
Normal |
|
2019 vs.
Normal |
|
2020 vs.
2019 |
||||||
Retail electric
|
$
|
(0.011
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.018
|
|
|
$
|
(0.029
|
)
|
MN decoupling and sales true-up
|
0.006
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
0.011
|
|
|||
Electric total
|
$
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.013
|
|
|
$
|
(0.018
|
)
|
Firm natural gas
|
(0.007
|
)
|
|
0.017
|
|
|
(0.024
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
(0.012
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.030
|
|
|
$
|
(0.042
|
)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
SPS
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|||||
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
Electric C&I
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Total retail electric sales
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Firm natural gas sales
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo (a)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
SPS
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|||||
Weather-normalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Electric C&I
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Total retail electric sales
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Firm natural gas sales
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 (Leap Year Adjusted)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo (a)
|
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
SPS
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
Xcel Energy
|
|||||
Weather-normalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Electric C&I
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Total retail electric sales
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Firm natural gas sales
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
(a)
|
CPUC approved a historical 10-year weather normalization approach for retail electric, effective March 1, 2020, which did not materially impact the weather-normalized calculation.
|
•
|
PSCo — Residential sales declined slightly due to lower use per customer, partially offset by an increase in customers. The decline in C&I was mainly due to lower use per customer, primarily led by the food products and service industries, partially offset by growth in the energy industry.
|
•
|
NSP-Minnesota — Residential sales declined reflecting lower use per customer, partially offset by customer additions. The decline in C&I sales was a result of lower use by certain customers in the energy, manufacturing and services sectors, partially offset by customer growth.
|
•
|
SPS — Residential sales decreased slightly primarily due to lower use per customer. C&I sales grew based on higher sales to large customers in the oil and natural gas industry in the Permian Basin.
|
•
|
NSP-Wisconsin — Residential sales growth was primarily attributable to customer additions, partially offset by less use per customer. The decline in C&I sales was largely due to lower use per customer, partially offset by customer additions and decreased sales to the manufacturing sector, which was partially offset by an increase in the energy sector.
|
•
|
Natural gas sales reflect an increase in the number of customers combined with lower customer use and the negative impacts of COVID-19 in March 2020.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Electric revenues
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
Electric fuel and purchased power
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
(914
|
)
|
||
Electric margin
|
|
$
|
1,406
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 vs. 2019 |
||
PTCs flowed back to customers (offset by a lower ETR)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
Estimated impact of weather (net of decoupling/sales true-up)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
New Mexico tax reform related regulatory settlement (2019)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Regulatory rate outcomes (Colorado and Wisconsin)
|
|
13
|
|
|
Non-fuel riders
|
|
13
|
|
|
Wholesale transmission revenue (net)
|
|
5
|
|
|
Sales growth (excluding weather impact, net of decoupling/sales true-up
|
|
4
|
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
6
|
|
|
Total decrease in electric margin
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Natural gas revenues
|
|
$
|
583
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
Cost of natural gas sold and transported
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
(479
|
)
|
||
Natural gas margin
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 vs. 2019 |
||
Estimated impact of weather
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
Transport sales
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Regulatory rate outcomes (Wisconsin)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Retail sales growth
|
|
2
|
|
|
Infrastructure and integrity riders
|
|
1
|
|
|
Conservation revenue (offset in expenses)
|
|
1
|
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Total decrease in natural gas margin
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
2020 vs. 2019 |
||
Employee benefits
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
Distribution
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Generation
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Strategic initiatives
|
|
7
|
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total decrease in O&M expenses
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
•
|
Employee benefits were lower primarily due to change in deferred compensation related liability, offset in Other (Expense) Income;
|
•
|
Distribution expenses declined due to storms, labor and overtime;
|
•
|
Generation expenses were lower from timing of maintenance and overhauls at power plants, partially offset by an increase in wind related amounts; and
|
•
|
Strategic initiatives expenses were higher due to increased spending on customer experience transformation program expenses and advanced grid infrastructure.
|
Public Utility Regulation
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date |
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
MPUC
|
||||||||||
2020 TCR
|
|
Electric
|
|
$82
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 TCR Rider. The filing included an ROE of 9.06%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2019 GUIC
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$29
|
|
November 2018
|
|
Received
|
|
In November 2018, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2019 GUIC Rider with the MPUC. The filing included an ROE of 10.25%. In January 2020, the MPUC approved an order setting an ROE of 9.04%.
|
2020 GUIC
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$21
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 GUIC Rider with the MPUC. The filing included an ROE of 9.04%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2020 RES
|
|
Electric
|
|
$102
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed the 2020 RES Rider with the MPUC. The requested amount includes a true-up for the 2019 rider of $38 million and the 2020 requested amount of $64 million. The filing included an ROE of 9.06%. Timing of an MPUC ruling is uncertain.
|
2020 Rate Case Stay Out Petition
|
|
Electric
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 2019
|
|
Received
|
|
In November 2019, NSP-Minnesota filed a three-year electric rate case with the MPUC, which included a stay-out petition. In December 2019, the MPUC verbally approved the stay-out petition including extension of the sales, capital and property tax true-up mechanisms and the delay of any increase to the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust annual accrual until Jan. 1, 2021. A written order of approval was received in March 2020.
|
•
|
Extends the life of the Monticello nuclear plant from 2030 to 2040;
|
•
|
Continues to run the Prairie Island nuclear plant through current end of life (2033 and 2034);
|
•
|
Includes the MEC acquisition and construction of the Sherco CC natural gas plant;
|
•
|
Includes the early retirement of the King coal plant (511 MW) in 2028 and the Sherco 3 coal plant (517 MW) in 2030;
|
•
|
Adds approximately 1,700 MW of firm peaking (CT, pumped hydro, battery storage, DR, etc.);
|
•
|
Adds approximately 1,200 MW of wind replacement; and
|
•
|
Adds approximately 4,000 MW of solar.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date |
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
CPUC
|
||||||||||
Rate Case
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$127
|
|
February 2020
|
|
Pending
|
|
In February 2020, PSCo filed a rate case with the CPUC seeking a net increase to retail gas rates of $126.8 million, reflecting a $144.5 million increase in base rate revenue, partially offset by $17.7 million of costs previously authorized through the Pipeline Integrity rider. The request is based on a 9.95% ROE, an equity ratio of 55.81% and a historic test year as of Sept. 30, 2019, adjusted for known and measurable differences for the 12-month period ended Sept. 30, 2020.
The procedural schedule is as follows:
•
Answer testimony - May 13, 2020;
•
Rebuttal testimony - June 8, 2020;
•
Evidentiary hearing - July 7-17, 2020;
•
Statement of position - July 31, 2020; and
•
CPUC decision is expected in the second half of 2020 and rates are anticipated to be effective in November 2020.
|
Rate Case
|
|
Electric
|
|
$158
|
|
May 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In 2019, PSCo filed a request with the CPUC seeking a net rate increase of $108.4 million, based on a requested ROE of 10.2% and an equity ratio of 55.6%.
In February 2020, the CPUC issued a written decision, resulting in an estimated $34.9 million net base rate revenue increase. The CPUC decision included a 9.3% ROE, an equity ratio of 55.61%, based on a current test year ended Aug. 31, 2019 and the implementation of decoupling in 2020 and other items. Final rates were implemented on Feb. 25, 2020. PSCo filed an application for rehearing/reconsideration, which is expected to be heard by the CPUC in the second quarter of 2020.
|
Rate Case Appeal
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
N/A
|
|
April 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In April 2019, PSCo filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the CPUC’s prior ruling regarding PSCo’s last natural gas rate case (approved in December 2018). The appeal requested review of the following: denial of a return on the prepaid pension and retiree medical assets; the use of a capital structure not based on the actual historical test year; and use of an average rate base methodology rather than a year-end rate base methodology. In March 2020, The District Court of Denver County ruled in favor of allowing the prepaid pension assets to be included in rate base; but it upheld the CPUC treatment of the retiree medical assets and capital structure methodology. The CPUC did not appeal the decision allowing inclusion of the prepaid pension assets in rate base.
|
Mechanism
|
|
Utility Service
|
|
Amount Requested (in millions)
|
|
Filing
Date |
|
Approval
|
|
Additional Information
|
NMPRC
|
||||||||||
Rate Case
|
|
Electric
|
|
$51
|
|
July 2019
|
|
Pending
|
|
In July 2019, SPS filed an electric rate case with the NMPRC seeking an increase in retail electric base rates of approximately $51 million. The rate request is based on an ROE of 10.35%, an equity ratio of 54.77%, a rate base of approximately $1.3 billion and a historic test year with rate base additions through Aug. 31, 2019. In December 2019, SPS revised its base rate increase request to approximately $47 million, based on an ROE of 10.10% and updated information. The request also included an increase of $14.6 million for accelerated depreciation including the early retirement of the Tolk coal plant in 2032.
In January 2020, SPS and various parties filed an uncontested comprehensive stipulation. The stipulation includes a base rate revenue increase of $31 million, an ROE of 9.45% and an equity ratio of 54.77%. The stipulation also includes an acceleration of depreciation on the Tolk coal plant to reflect early retirement in 2037, which results in a total increase in depreciation expense of $8 million. The parties to the stipulation agreed not to oppose the full application of depreciation rates associated with the 2032 retirement date in SPS’ next base rate case. A NMPRC decision is expected later in the year. SPS anticipates final rates will go into effect in the second or third quarter of 2020. |
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Staff
|
|
AXM
|
|
OPUC
|
|
TIEC
|
|
DOE
|
||||||||||
SPS Direct Testimony
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Recommended base rate adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
ROE
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|||||
Capital structure
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||
Tolk/Harrington O&M disallowance
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Distribution and Transmission Capital Disallowances (a)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Depreciation expense
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Excess ADIT unprotected plant
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Income Tax Expense Differences
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Other, net
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
Total Adjustments
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|||||
Total proposed revenue change
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Recommended Position
|
|
Staff
|
|
AXM
|
|
OPUC (b)
|
|
TIEC
|
|
DOE
|
|||||
ROE
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Equity Ratio
|
|
51.00
|
%
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
51.00
|
%
|
|
53.00
|
%
|
(a)
|
Staff recommends exclusion of approximately $134 million in transmission, distribution, and general plant in service in this rate case resulting in an approximate $7 million decrease to the revenue requirement.
|
(b)
|
OPUC did not provide a recommendation for an ROE or equity ratio. For illustrative purposes an ROE of 9.5% was used.
|
Revenue Request (Millions of Dollars)
|
|
|
||
Hale Wind Farm
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
Capital investments
|
|
47
|
|
|
Depreciation rate change (including Tolk)
|
|
34
|
|
|
Cost of capital
|
|
8
|
|
|
Expiring purchased power contracts
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
Other, net
|
|
8
|
|
|
New revenue request
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
Environmental
|
Derivatives, Risk Management and Market Risk
|
|
Futures / Forwards Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
4 to 5 Years
|
|
Greater Than 5 Years |
|
Total Fair Value
|
||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota (a)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
NSP-Minnesota (b)
|
|
4
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|||||
PSCo (a)
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||||
PSCo (b)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
Options Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
4 to 5 Years
|
|
Greater Than 5 Years |
|
Total Fair Value
|
||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota (b)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Fair value of commodity trading net contract (liabilities) assets outstanding at Jan. 1
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Contracts realized or settled during the period
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||
Commodity trading contract additions and changes during the period
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
Fair value of commodity trading net contract (liabilities) assets outstanding at March 31
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
VaR Limit
|
|
Average
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
||||||||||
2020
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
2019
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(1,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
•
|
In January 2020, contributions of $150 million were made across four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans.
|
•
|
In 2019, contributions of $154 million were made across four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans.
|
•
|
For future years, contributions will be made as deemed appropriate based on evaluation of various factors including the funded status of the plans, minimum funding requirements, interest rates and expected investment returns.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Credit Facility (a)
|
|
Drawn (b)
|
|
Available
|
|
Cash
|
|
Liquidity
|
||||||||||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
1,454
|
|
PSCo
|
|
700
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
584
|
|
|||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
500
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
542
|
|
|||||
SPS
|
|
500
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
375
|
|
|||||
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
150
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
96
|
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
3,100
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
2,685
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
3,051
|
|
(a)
|
Credit facilities expire in June 2024.
|
(b)
|
Includes outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.
|
(Millions of Dollars)
|
|
Limit
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
Available
|
||||||
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
•
|
$1.25 billion for Xcel Energy Inc.;
|
•
|
$700 million for PSCo;
|
•
|
$500 million for NSP-Minnesota;
|
•
|
$500 million for SPS; and
|
•
|
$150 million for NSP-Wisconsin.
|
(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
|
Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2019 |
||||
Borrowing limit
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
595
|
|
||
Average amount outstanding
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
||
Maximum amount outstanding
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
||
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
||
Weighted average interest rate at period end
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Security
|
|
Amount
|
|
Status
|
|
Tenor
|
|
Coupon
|
|||
Xcel Energy Inc.
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes
|
|
$
|
600
|
million
|
|
Completed
|
|
10 Year
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
NSP-Minnesota
|
|
First Mortgage Bonds
|
|
700
|
million
|
|
Pending
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin
|
|
First Mortgage Bonds
|
|
100
|
million
|
|
Pending
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
PSCo
|
|
First Mortgage Bonds
|
|
750
|
million
|
|
Pending
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
SPS
|
|
First Mortgage Bonds
|
|
350
|
million
|
|
Pending
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
•
|
Constructive outcomes in all rate case and regulatory proceedings.
|
•
|
Normal weather patterns for the remainder of the year.
|
•
|
Weather-normalized retail electric sales are projected to decline ~4%, under the base case scenario.
|
•
|
Weather-normalized retail firm natural gas sales are projected to decline ~1%, under the base case scenario.
|
•
|
Capital rider revenue is projected to increase $45 million to $55 million (net of PTCs). PTCs are credited to customers, through capital riders and reductions to electric margin.
|
•
|
O&M expenses are projected to decline approximately 4% to 5% under the base case scenario.
|
•
|
Depreciation expense is projected to increase approximately $160 million to $170 million.
|
•
|
Property taxes are projected to increase approximately $35 million to $45 million.
|
•
|
Interest expense (net of AFUDC - debt) is projected to increase $60 million to $70 million.
|
•
|
AFUDC - equity is projected to increase approximately $25 million to $35 million.
|
•
|
The ETR is projected to be approximately 0%. The ETR reflects benefits of PTCs which are credited to customers through electric margin and will not have a material impact on net income.
|
(a)
|
Ongoing earnings is calculated using net income and adjusting for certain nonrecurring or infrequent items that are, in management’s view, not reflective of ongoing operations. Ongoing earnings could differ from those prepared in accordance with GAAP for unplanned and/or unknown adjustments. Xcel Energy is unable to forecast if any of these items will occur or provide a quantitative reconciliation of the guidance for ongoing EPS to corresponding GAAP EPS.
|
(b)
|
The global outbreak of COVID-19 is currently impacting countries, communities, supply chains and markets. The ultimate severity of this event is uncertain and could have a material impact on our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
|
•
|
Deliver long-term annual EPS growth of 5% to 7% based off of a 2019 base of $2.60 per share, which represents the mid-point of the original 2019 guidance range of $2.55 to $2.65 per share;
|
•
|
Deliver annual dividend increases of 5% to 7%;
|
•
|
Target a dividend payout ratio of 60% to 70%; and
|
•
|
Maintain senior secured debt credit ratings in the A range.
|
COVID-19
|
•
|
Mild Scenario (severe impact through May with a V-shaped economic recovery), resulting in the following change in electric sales for 2020: an increase of approximately 1% in residential; a decline of approximately 4% in C&I; and a decline in total retail electric sales of approximately 2%. This sales decline would reduce EPS by approximately $0.11.
|
•
|
Base Case Scenario (severe impact through the second quarter with slower U-shaped recovery with lingering effects throughout 2020), resulting in the following change in electric sales for 2020: an increase of approximately 1% in residential; a decline of approximately 6% in C&I; and a decline in total retail electric sales of approximately 4%. This sales decline would reduce EPS by approximately $0.17.
|
•
|
Severe Scenario (severe impact through the third quarter followed by protracted challenged L-shaped recovery), resulting in the following change in electric sales for 2020: an increase of approximately 1% in residential; a decline of approximately 12% in C&I; and a decline in total retail electric sales of approximately 8%. This sales decline would reduce EPS by approximately $0.37.
|
•
|
The mild, base case and severe scenarios include a decrease in natural gas sales of 0%, 1% and 2%, respectively.
|
•
|
Potential impacts due to other items could have negative EPS impact of $0.02 to $0.05, assuming constructive regulatory treatment.
|
•
|
Xcel Energy has an outstanding forward equity agreement in connection with a $743 million public offering of 11.8 million shares. These shares have not been issued and we expect to settle this equity forward later in 2020.
|
•
|
The MEC sale will result in approximately $650 million of additional funds, after our previously-announced planned corporate giving, that can be used for general corporate purposes and enhanced liquidity.
|
•
|
Xcel Energy continues to have access to the capital markets on favorable terms.
|
•
|
Executing work-from-home practices for employees who can do their work remotely;
|
•
|
Enhancing cleaning practices within our facilities;
|
•
|
Providing proper personal protective equipment and following CDC and state guidelines;
|
•
|
Conducting employee temperature checks;
|
•
|
Changing work practices to promote social distancing;
|
•
|
Splitting crews and staggering work times;
|
•
|
Limiting employee entry into customer homes to emergency situations only; and
|
•
|
Reminding customers of increased risks of scam activity.
|
•
|
Continued pay for employees who have been quarantined;
|
•
|
Expanded medical plan coverage for employees and their families to include 100% of COVID-19 medical costs;
|
•
|
Offered up to an additional 80 hours of paid time off to employees for pandemic related illness;
|
•
|
Expanded eligibility for our paid time off donation program to employees who have or are caring for a family member who has been diagnosed with the virus;
|
•
|
Offered new anxiety and stress management tools, in addition to our existing Employee Assistance Program; and
|
•
|
Provided resources and educational materials to support employees adjusting to distance learning with their children.
|
•
|
Plan to donate approximately $20 million in corporate giving, including COVID-19 relief in 2020. Along with the Xcel Energy Foundation, we have already donated approximately $1.5 million to support pandemic relief efforts across our eight-state footprint and implemented a virtual volunteering program;
|
•
|
Donated over 300,000 masks to hospitals in the communities we serve; and launched a special $300,000 COVID-19 two-to-one matching campaign, which provides a match for employee donations to impacted non-profit organizations, in addition to our standard employee matching gift programs; and
|
•
|
Submitted a proposal to reduce our approved 2020 Fuel Forecast by $25 million to provide immediate relief to our Minnesota customers during the pandemic and resulting economic downturn, which will be implemented across the three summer months equally.
|
ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
ITEM 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS
|
ITEM 2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|||||||||||
Period
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
Average Price Paid per Share
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
|||||
Jan. 1, 2020 - Jan. 31, 2020
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Feb. 1, 2020 - Feb. 29, 2020
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March 1, 2020 - March 31, 2020 (a)
|
|
6,394
|
|
|
62.32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
|
6,394
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
(a)
|
Xcel Energy Inc. withholds stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations on vesting of awards of restricted stock under the Xcel Energy Executive Annual Incentive Award Plan.
|
ITEM 6 — EXHIBITS
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Report or Registration Statement
|
SEC File or Registration Number
|
Exhibit Reference
|
3.01*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated May 16, 2012
|
001-03034
|
3.01
|
|
3.02*
|
Xcel Energy Inc Form 8-K dated April 3, 2020
|
001-03034
|
3.01
|
|
4.01*
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated April 1, 2020
|
001-03034
|
4.01
|
|
Xcel Energy Inc. Form 8-K dated March 23, 2020
|
001-03034
|
10.01
|
||
|
|
|
||
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
|
|||
101.SCH
|
XBRL Schema
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Calculation
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Definition
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Label
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation
|
|
|
|
104
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
|
|
|
|
|
XCEL ENERGY INC.
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2020
|
By:
|
/s/ JEFFREY S. SAVAGE
|
|
|
Jeffrey S. Savage
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN J. VAN ABEL
|
|
|
Brian J. Van Abel
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
1.
|
Schedule I - Participants: Schedule I to the Policy is hereby amended to add Brian Van Abel to the Schedule as a Tier I Participant as follows:
|
Name
|
Tier
|
Severance Multiple
|
Change-in-Control Multiple
|
Brian Van Abel
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2.
|
Savings Clause. Except as hereinabove set forth, the Xcel Energy Senior Executive Severance and Change-In-Control Policy shall continue in full force and effect.
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy Inc. (a Minnesota corporation);
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Xcel Energy Inc. (a Minnesota corporation);
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ BRIAN J. VAN ABEL
|
|
Brian J. Van Abel
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
(1)
|
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
(2)
|
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Xcel Energy as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.
|
|
/s/ BEN FOWKE
|
|
Ben Fowke
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN J. VAN ABEL
|
|
Brian J. Van Abel
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|