ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NorthWestern Energy - Delivering a Bright Future
NorthWestern Corporation, doing business as NorthWestern Energy, provides essential energy infrastructure and valuable services that enrich lives and empower communities while serving as long-term partners to our customers and communities. We work to deliver safe, reliable, and innovative energy solutions that create value for customers, communities, employees, and investors. We do this by providing low-cost and reliable service performed by highly-adaptable and skilled employees. We provide electricity and / or natural gas to approximately 764,200 customers in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Yellowstone National Park. We have provided service in South Dakota and Nebraska since 1923 and in Montana since 2002.
We manage our businesses by the nature of services provided, and operate principally in three business segments: electric utility operations; natural gas utility operations; and all other, which primarily consists of unallocated corporate costs. Our electric utility operations include the generation, purchase, transmission and distribution of electricity, and our natural gas utility operations include the production, purchase, transmission, storage, and distribution of natural gas. Our customer base consists of a mix of residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers.
Our electric and natural gas utility operations are not dependent on a single customer, or even a few customers, and the loss of any one or even a few of our largest customers is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Our utility operations are seasonal and weather patterns can have a material impact on operating performance. Consumption of electricity is often greater in the summer and winter months for cooling and heating, respectively. Because natural gas is used primarily for residential and commercial heating, the demand for this product depends heavily upon weather patterns throughout our service territory, and a significant amount of natural gas revenues are recognized in the first and fourth quarters related to the heating season.
Environmental, Social and Governance
We are focused on meeting current energy infrastructure and service needs at a reasonable and fair cost for today’s customers while ensuring the ability to meet the needs of tomorrow’s customers. “Sustainability” requires meeting economic, societal, and environmental objectives. As a provider of essential infrastructure and service, a sustainable enterprise is vital to our customers and communities, as well as to our investors and employees.
Over the past 100 years, we have maintained our commitment to provide customers with reliable and affordable electric and natural gas services while also being good stewards of the environment. Over time, we have increased our environmental sustainability efforts and our access to carbon-free energy resources. In February 2022, we made a commitment to achieving Net-Zero by the year 2050 for Scope 1 and Scope 2 carbon and methane emissions. Our Scope 1 emissions are primarily from owned electric generation plants, fugitive emissions from our natural gas production, gathering, transmission and distribution systems and company owned transportation fleet. Our Scope 2 emissions are primarily from the electric and natural gas utilized to heat, cool and power our offices, warehouses and other facilities.
We currently own a mix of clean and carbon-free energy resources balanced with traditional energy sources that are necessary for us to deliver affordable and reliable electricity to our customers 24/7. In 2022, approximately 55 percent of our retail needs originated from carbon-free resources, compared to approximately 39 percent (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2022 Annual Energy Review, Electricity Net Generation: Electric Power Sector) for the total U.S. electric power industry in 2021. While we added additional carbon-free resources in 2022, our total output from carbon-free resources decreased from 56 percent in 2021 to 55 percent in 2022 due to our fossil fuel resources being dispatched at a higher percentage than in 2021. We do not receive all of the related Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) from our contracted electric supply resources and periodically sell RECs produced by our own carbon-free energy resources. The owner of the RECs claims the renewable attributes of the energy. Our resource mix does not represent the actual energy delivered to our customers. Market purchases and sales fill the gap between resources and customer demand.
We are a fully regulated provider of critical infrastructure and essential services. Therefore, our success in meeting our obligations to our customers and the communities we serve depends on public policy. We believe that policy makers in the states we serve are committed to reliable, adequate, and affordable service, and a strong customer focus. We support policies that enable investment in critical infrastructure and responsible stewardship.
We believe that technological advancements, along with decreasing costs of carbon-free generation and the regionalization of intermittent generation, will significantly contribute to our goal of Net-Zero carbon emissions by 2050. The pace of transition to Net-Zero will depend on the timing of technological advancements, costs, and retirement of our existing coal fleet.
In South Dakota and Montana, we develop an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) every two and three years, respectively. These IRPs, which are presented to our state regulatory commissions, identify resource needs, known and expected risks, as well as key variables to be used in evaluating resources. We then undertake a transparent resource solicitation process, run by an independent third party, to evaluate the least cost resources that address key risks and needs identified by the IRP. All generation types have the opportunity to participate in our Request for Proposals (RFP). Therefore, the specific resources that will be acquired to meet future need are dependent upon our current and future IRPs and the RFP process, in conjunction with the actions of our regulators during the regulatory process..
For a more detailed description of our environmental, social, governance and sustainability activities, please visit our company website at https://www.northwesternenergy.com. References to our website in this report are provided as a convenience and do not constitute, and should not be viewed as, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on, or available through, the website. Therefore, such information should not be considered part of this report.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MONTANA ELECTRIC OPERATIONS |
Our regulated electric utility business in Montana includes generation, transmission and distribution. Our service territory covers approximately 107,600 square miles, representing approximately 73 percent of Montana's land area. During 2022, we delivered electricity to approximately 398,200 customers in 221 communities and their surrounding rural areas, 11 rural electric cooperatives and, in Wyoming, to the Yellowstone National Park. In 2022, by category, residential, commercial, industrial, and other sales accounted for approximately 45%, 46%, 5%, and 4%, respectively, of our Montana retail electric utility revenue.
Transmission and Distribution
Our electric system is composed of high voltage transmission lines and low voltage distribution lines as follows:
| | | | | |
Electric Transmission Lines | |
Miles of 500 kV | 497 | |
Miles of 230 kV | 987 | |
Miles of 161 kV | 1,184 | |
Miles of 115 kV and lower voltage | 3,929 | |
Total Miles of Electric Transmission Lines | 6,597 | |
| |
Electric Distribution Lines | |
Miles of overhead line | 13,276 | |
Miles of underground line | 5,258 | |
Total Miles of Electric Distribution Lines | 18,534 | |
| |
Total Transmission and Distribution Substations | 394 | |
In addition to delivering energy to distribution systems to serve customers, we also transmit electricity for nonregulated entities owning generation, and utilities, cooperatives, and power marketers serving the Montana electricity market. Our total control area peak demand reached a new all-time peak of approximately 2,073 MWs on December 22, 2022. Our control area average demand for 2022 was approximately 1,379 MWs per hour, with total energy delivered of more than 12.08 million MWHs.
Our transmission system is directly interconnected with Avista Corporation; Idaho Power Company; PacifiCorp; the Bonneville Power Administration; WAPA; and Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. Such interconnections, coupled with transmission line capacity made available under agreements with some of the above entities, permit the interchange, purchase, and sale of power among all major electric systems in the west interconnecting with the winter-peaking northern and summer-peaking southern regions of the western power system. We provide wholesale transmission service and firm and non-firm transmission services for eligible transmission customers pursuant to our FERC Open Access Transmission Tariff.
Electric Supply
Our annual retail electric supply load requirements average approximately 750 MWs, with a peak load of approximately 1,250 MWs, and are supplied by owned and contracted resources and market purchases with multiple counterparties.
Owned generation resources supplied approximately 65 percent of our retail load requirements for 2022. We expect that approximately 65 percent of our retail obligations will be met by owned generation resources in 2023. In addition, we have contracts with QFs totaling 469 MWs of nameplate capacity, including 87 MWs from waste petroleum coke and waste coal, 268 MWs from wind, 17 MWs from hydro, and 97 MWs from solar projects. We have several other long-term power purchase agreements including contracts for 135 MWs nameplate capacity from wind generation, 100 MWs from the British Columbia hydro system, 52 MWs of natural gas generation, and 21 MWs of seasonal base-load hydro supply. On average, our owned and long-term contracted resources are expected to provide enough energy to meet our retail energy load requirements in 2023. Load requirements during peak demand in excess of our owned and long-term contracted resources will be satisfied with market purchases.
Owned Generation Facilities
Details of these generating facilities are described in the following tables.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hydro Facilities | COD | River Source | FERC License Expiration | Owned MW |
Black Eagle | 1927 | Missouri | 2040 | 23 |
Cochrane | 1958 | Missouri | 2040 | 62 |
Hauser | 1911 | Missouri | 2040 | 21 |
Holter | 1918 | Missouri | 2040 | 50 |
Madison | 1906 | Madison | 2040 | 12 |
Morony | 1930 | Missouri | 2040 | 49 |
Mystic | 1925 | West Rosebud Creek | 2050 | 12 |
Rainbow | 1910/2013 | Missouri | 2040 | 64 |
Ryan | 1915 | Missouri | 2040 | 72 |
Thompson Falls | 1915/1995 | Clark Fork | 2025 | 94 |
Total(1) | | | | 459 |
(1) The Hebgen facility (0 MW net capacity) is excluded from the figures above. These are run-of-river dams except for Mystic, which is storage generation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Facilities | | Fuel Source | | Ownership Interest | | Owned MW |
Colstrip Unit 4, located near Colstrip in southeastern Montana | | Sub-bituminous coal | | 30% | | 222 |
DGGS, located near Anaconda, Montana | | Natural Gas & Liquid Fuel | | 100% | | 150 |
Spion Kop Wind, located in Judith Basin County in Montana | | Wind | | 100% | | 40 |
Two Dot Wind, located in Wheatland County in Montana | | Wind | | 100% | | 11 |
Colstrip Unit 4 provides base-load supply and is operated by Talen Montana, LLC (Talen). Talen has a 30 percent ownership interest in Colstrip Unit 3. We have a reciprocal sharing agreement with Talen regarding the operation of Colstrip Units 3 and 4, in which each party receives 15 percent of the respective combined output and is responsible for 15 percent of the respective operating and construction costs, regardless of whether a particular cost is specified to Colstrip Unit 3 or 4. However, each party is responsible for its own fuel-related costs. Colstrip Unit 4 is supplied with fuel from adjacent coal reserves under a coal supply agreement in effect through 2025. See Item 1A Risk Factors "Regulatory, Legislative and Legal Risks" for further discussion regarding the service life of generation facilities.
Resource Planning
Resource planning is an important function necessary to meet our customers' future energy needs and is used to guide resource acquisition activities. We filed our latest IRP with the MPSC in August 2019 and supplemented that plan in December 2020. Both filings projected generation capacity deficits and negative reserve margins. Since that time, we have been working to address the deficit with a combination of owned resources and long-term capacity contracts as well as short-and-intermediate term capacity contracts. We expect to file an updated IRP during the first quarter of 2023.
We issued an all-source competitive solicitation request in January 2020 for peaking and flexible capacity to be available for commercial operation beginning in 2023. The competitive solicitation resulted in a 100 MW, 5-year purchase of capacity from a market participant and the development of the 175 MW Yellowstone County Generating Station, which is currently under construction. In addition to our responsibility to meet peak demand, national NERC reliability standards increased the need for us to have greater dispatchable generation capacity available and be capable of increasing or decreasing output to address intermittent generation such as wind and solar. Our generation portfolio is a balanced mix of energy and capacity resources having different operating characteristics and fuel sources designed to provide energy at the lowest possible cost to meet our obligation to serve retail customers while maintaining reliability.
Western Energy Imbalance Market
We entered the Western Energy Imbalance Market (EIM), operated by the California Independent System Operator, on June 16, 2021. We added EIM transfer capability with Bonneville Power Administration, Avista Corp, and Tacoma Power in 2022, in addition to our existing EIM transfer capability with PacifiCorp and Idaho Power Company.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SOUTH DAKOTA ELECTRIC OPERATIONS |
Our South Dakota electric utility business operates as a vertically integrated generation, transmission and distribution utility. We have the exclusive right to serve an area in South Dakota comprised of 25 counties. We provide retail electricity to more than 64,700 customers in 116 communities in South Dakota. In 2022, by category, residential, commercial and other sales accounted for approximately 38%, 60%, and 2%, respectively, of our South Dakota retail electric utility revenue.
Transmission and Distribution
Our electric system includes high voltage transmission and low voltage distribution lines as follows:
| | | | | |
Electric Transmission Lines | |
Miles of 345 kV | 25 | |
Miles of 230 kV | 18 | |
Miles of 115 kV and lower voltages | 1,265 | |
Total Miles of Electric Transmission Lines | 1,308 | |
| |
Electric Distribution Lines | |
Miles of overhead line | 1,619 | |
Miles of underground line | 723 | |
Total Miles of Electric Distribution Lines | 2,342 | |
| |
Total Transmission and Distribution Substations | 121 | |
Our South Dakota system is interconnected with the transmission facilities of Otter Tail Power Company; Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.; Xcel Energy Inc.; and WAPA. We also have emergency interconnections with the transmission facilities of East River Electric Cooperative, Inc. and West Central Electric Cooperative.
We are a transmission-owning member in the SPP, with our transmission facilities residing in zone 19 of the SPP footprint. Each year, we review all new or modified transmission assets and transfer functional control of assets that qualify under the SPP Tariff to the SPP. This annual update goes into effect on April 1st each year. To date, we have transferred control of 333 line miles of 115 kV facilities and over 158 line miles of 69 kV facilities. Along with SPP, our South Dakota facilities have ties to MISO. We have grandfathered agreements in MISO, which provide us the access to move the power from the Coyote, Big Stone, and Neal power plants to our customers. Along with operating the transmission system, SPP also coordinates regional transmission planning for all of its members on an annual basis through its Integrated Transmission Planning (ITP) process. Our annual participation in the ITP process includes model development, system needs assessment, and solution development to address identified needs.
Electric Supply
Our annual retail electric supply load requirements average approximately 200 MWs, with a peak load of 340 MWs, and are supplied by owned and contracted resources and market purchases. We use market purchases and peaking generation to provide peak supply in excess of our base-load capacity. We are a member of the SPP. As a market participant in SPP, we buy and sell wholesale energy and reserves in both day-ahead and real-time markets through the operation of a single, consolidated SPP balancing authority. We and other SPP members submit into the SPP market both offers to sell our generation and bids to purchase power to serve our load. SPP optimizes next-day and real-time generation dispatch across the region and provides participants with greater access to economic energy. Marketing activities in SPP are handled for us by a third-party provider acting as our agent.
Electric supply resources include 211 MWs from jointly owned coal plants and 138 MWs from two natural gas-fired plants. Additional resources include several peaking units and an 80 MW wind facility. We also purchase the output of four wind projects, three of which are QFs, under power purchase agreements. Actual output for our wind resources varies based upon weather conditions.
Owned Generation Facilities
Details of our generating facilities are described further in the following chart:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Generation Facilities | | Fuel Source | | Ownership Interest | | Owned MW |
Big Stone Plant, located near Big Stone City in northeastern South Dakota | | Sub-bituminous coal | | 23.4% | | 111 |
Aberdeen Generating Units No. 1 and 2, located near Aberdeen, South Dakota | | Natural gas & Liquid Fuel | | 100.0% | | 80 |
Beethoven Wind Project, located near Tripp, South Dakota | | Wind | | 100.0% | | 80 |
Bob Glanzer Generating Station, located near Huron, South Dakota | | Natural Gas | | 100.0% | | 58 |
Neal Electric Generating Unit No. 4, located near Sioux City, Iowa | | Sub-bituminous coal | | 8.7% | | 57 |
Coyote Electric Generating Station, located near Beulah, North Dakota | | Lignite coal | | 10.0% | | 43 |
Miscellaneous combustion turbine units and small diesel units (used only during peak periods) | | Combination of fuel oil and natural gas | | 100.0% | | 17 |
Total | | | | | | 446 |
We completed the construction of the 58 MW Bob Glanzer Generating Station in the summer of 2022. This plant includes flexible reciprocating internal combustion engines near Huron, South Dakota.
The Big Stone, Coyote and Neal plants are owned jointly with unaffiliated parties. Each of the jointly owned plants is subject to a joint management structure, and we are not the operator of any of these plants. Based on our ownership interest, we are entitled to a proportionate share of the capacity of our jointly owned plants and are responsible for a proportionate share of the operating costs.
The fuel for our jointly owned base-load generating plants is provided through supply contracts of various lengths with several coal companies. Coyote is a mine-mouth generating facility. Neal Unit No. 4 and Big Stone receive their fuel supply via rail. The average delivered cost by type of fuel burned varies between generation facilities due to differences in transportation costs and owner purchasing power for coal supply. Changes in our fuel costs are passed on to customers through the operation of the fuel adjustment clause in our South Dakota tariffs.
Resource Planning
We have a resource plan that includes estimates of customer usage and programs to provide for the economic, reliable and timely supply of energy. We continue to update our load forecast to identify the future electric energy needs of our customers, and we evaluate additional generating capacity requirements on an ongoing basis.
We submitted a plan to the SDPUC in September of 2022 to provide for the modernization of our generating fleet, which is focused on improving reliability and flexibility.
Montana
Our regulated natural gas utility business in Montana includes production, storage, transmission and distribution. During 2022, we distributed natural gas to approximately 209,100 customers in 118 Montana communities over a system that consists of approximately 5,100 miles of underground distribution pipelines. We also serve several smaller distribution companies that provide service to approximately 37,000 customers. We transmit natural gas in Montana from production receipt points and storage facilities to distribution points and other nonaffiliated transmission systems. We transported natural gas volumes of approximately 47 Bcf during the year ended December 31, 2022.
| | | | | |
Miles of Natural Gas Transmission | 2,235 | |
| |
Miles of Natural Gas Distribution | 5,099 | |
| |
City Gate Stations | 135 | |
We have connections in Montana with four major, unaffiliated transmission systems: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Colorado Interstate Gas, and Spur Energy. Twelve compressor sites provide more than 46,000 horsepower on the transmission line and an additional 15,000 horsepower at our storage fields, capable of moving more than 360,000 dekatherms per day. In addition, we own and operate two transmission pipelines through our subsidiaries, Canadian-Montana Pipe Line Corporation and Havre Pipeline Company, LLC.
Natural gas is used primarily for residential and commercial heating, and as fuel for two electric generating facilities. The demand for natural gas largely depends upon weather conditions. Our Montana retail natural gas supply requirements for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately 23.2 Bcf. Our Montana natural gas supply requirements for electric generation fuel for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately 5.7 Bcf. We have contracted with several major producers and marketers with varying contract durations to provide the anticipated supply to meet ongoing requirements. Our natural gas supply requirements are fulfilled through third-party fixed-term purchase contracts, short-term market purchases and owned production. Our portfolio approach to natural gas supply is intended to enable us to maintain a diversified supply of natural gas sufficient to meet our supply requirements. We benefit from direct access to suppliers in significant natural gas producing regions in the United States, primarily the Rocky Mountains (Colorado), Montana, and Alberta, Canada.
Owned Production and Storage - Since 2010, we have acquired gas production and gathering system assets as a part of an overall strategy to provide rate stability and customer value: as we own these assets, which are regulated, our customers are protected from potential price spikes in the market. As of December 31, 2022, these owned reserves totaled approximately 35.1 Bcf and are estimated to provide approximately 3.0 Bcf in 2023, or approximately 13 percent of our expected annual retail natural gas load in Montana. In addition, we own and operate three working natural gas storage fields in Montana with aggregate working gas capacity of approximately 17.85 Bcf and maximum aggregate daily deliverability of approximately 194,000 dekatherms.
South Dakota and Nebraska
We provide natural gas to approximately 49,200 customers in 80 South Dakota communities and approximately 43,000 customers in 4 Nebraska communities. In South Dakota, we also transport natural gas for nine gas-marketing firms and three large end-user accounts. In Nebraska, we transport natural gas for four gas-marketing firms and one large end-user account. We delivered approximately 31.0 Bcf of third-party transportation volume on our South Dakota distribution system and approximately 3.8 Bcf of third-party transportation volume on our Nebraska distribution system during 2022.
| | | | | |
Miles of Natural Gas Transmission | 55 | |
| |
Miles of Natural Gas Distribution | 2,545 | |
Our South Dakota natural gas supply requirements for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately 6.3 Bcf. We contract with a third party under an asset management agreement to manage transportation and storage of supply to minimize cost and price volatility to our customers. In Nebraska, our natural gas supply requirements for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately 4.4 Bcf. We contract with a third party under an asset management agreement that includes pipeline capacity, supply, and asset optimization activities. To supplement firm gas supplies in South Dakota and Nebraska, we contract for firm natural gas storage services to meet the heating season and peak day requirements of our customers.
Municipal Natural Gas Franchise Agreements
We have municipal franchises to provide natural gas service in the communities we serve. The terms of the franchises vary by community. Our Montana franchises typically have a fixed 10-year term and continue for additional 10-year terms unless and until canceled, with 5 years notice. The maximum term permitted under Nebraska law for these franchises is 25 years while the maximum term permitted under South Dakota law is 20 years. Our policy generally is to seek renewal or extension of a franchise in the last year of its term. We continue to serve those customers while we obtain formal renewals. During the next five years, nine of our Montana franchises could expire by action taken by the franchises' city or town, which account for approximately 9,077 or four percent of our Montana natural gas customers. Six of our South Dakota franchises and one
franchise in Nebraska, which account for approximately 27,104 or 29 percent of our South Dakota and Nebraska natural gas customers, are scheduled to reach the end of their fixed term during the next five years. We do not anticipate termination of any of these franchises.
NorthWestern’s provision of utility service is regulated by the MPSC, the SDPUC, the NPSC, and the FERC. NorthWestern is also regulated by many other state and federal agencies. For example, because NorthWestern’s operations impact land, waterways and the air, NorthWestern is subject to a wide range of regulations administered by the federal Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and parallel state agencies regulating environmental and natural resources in Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. Another example relates to NorthWestern’s provision of natural gas service. The U.S. Department of Transportation through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, along with its state partners, regulates natural gas pipeline and natural gas storage field safety. As a publicly-traded company, we are subject to the SEC’s requirements regarding financial reporting, disclosures, and laws and regulations protecting investors. We are subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which regulates workplace safety. We are also subject to local zoning laws and regulations.
As detailed below, the rates we charge our utility customers are set through approval by the regulatory commission with jurisdiction in each of our respective service territories. Base rates are the rates that are intended to allow us the opportunity to collect from our customers total revenues (revenue requirements) equal to our cost of providing delivery and rate-based supply services, plus a reasonable rate of return on invested capital. We have both electric and natural gas base rates and cost tracking clauses. We may ask the respective regulatory commission to increase base rates from time to time. Rate increase requests are normally reviewed based on historical data and any resulting approvals may not always keep pace with increasing costs. For more information on current regulatory matters, see Note 3 - Regulatory Matters, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following is a summary of our rate base (amounts we earn a return on) and authorized rates of return in each jurisdiction, estimated as of December 31, 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jurisdiction and Service | | Implementation Date | | Authorized Rate Base (millions) | | Year-end Estimated Rate Base (millions) | | Authorized Overall Rate of Return | | Authorized Return on Equity | | Authorized Equity Level |
Montana electric delivery and production(1) | | April 2019(4) | | $2,030.1 | | $2,675.8 | | 6.92% | | 9.65% | | 49.38% |
Montana - Colstrip Unit 4 | | April 2019 | | 304.0 | | 271.3 | | 8.25% | | 10.00% | | 50.00% |
Montana natural gas delivery and production(2) | | September 2017(4) | | 430.2 | | 643.3 | | 6.96% | | 9.55% | | 46.79% |
Total Montana | | | | $2,764.3 | | $3,590.4 | | | | | | |
South Dakota electric(3) | | December 2015 | | $557.3 | | $799.6 | | 7.24% | | n/a | | n/a |
South Dakota natural gas(3) | | December 2011 | | 65.9 | | 97.8 | | 7.80% | | n/a | | n/a |
Total South Dakota | | | | $623.2 | | $897.4 | | | | | | |
Nebraska natural gas(3) | | December 2007 | | $24.3 | | $49.9 | | 8.49% | | 10.40% | | n/a |
| | | | $3,411.8 | | $4,537.7 | | | | | | |
(1) The revenue requirement associated with the FERC regulated portion of Montana electric transmission and ancillary services are included as revenue credits to our MPSC jurisdictional customers. Therefore, we do not separately reflect FERC authorized rate base or authorized returns.
(2) The Montana gas revenue requirement includes a step down which approximates annual depletion of our natural gas production assets included in rate base.
(3) For those items marked as "n/a," the respective settlement and/or order was not specific as to these terms.
(4) On August 8, 2022, we filed a Montana electric and natural gas rate review filing (2021 test year) requesting an increase to our authorized rate base, return on equity, and equity level in our capital structure. We expect a final order regarding this rate review in 2023.
MPSC Regulation
Our Montana operations are subject to the jurisdiction of the MPSC with respect to rates, terms and conditions of service, accounting records, electric service territorial issues and other aspects of our operations, including when we issue, assume, or guarantee securities in Montana, or when we create liens on our regulated Montana properties. We have an obligation to provide service to our customers with an opportunity to earn a regulated rate of return.
Electric Supply Tracking Mechanism - The Power Cost and Credit Adjustment Mechanism (PCCAM) tracks, for recovery through utility rates, the cost of power purchased and fuel used to generate electricity. The PCCAM incorporates sharing of a portion of the business risk or benefit associated with the energy supply costs with 90 percent of the variance above or below the established base revenues and actual costs collected from or refunded to customers. Customer prices may be adjusted
annually to absorb the difference for the annual tracking period. Annual filings are based on a July through June 12-month tracking period, and are subject to review by the MPSC to determine if electric supply procurement activities were prudent. If the MPSC subsequently determines that a procurement activity was imprudent, recovery of such costs may be disallowed.
Natural Gas Supply Tracker - Rates for our Montana natural gas supply are set by the MPSC. Certain supply rates are adjusted on a monthly basis for volumes and costs during each July to June 12-month tracking period based on the established base revenues and actual costs collected from customers or refunded to customers. Customer prices may be adjusted annually to absorb the difference for the annual tracking period. Annual filings are based on a July through June 12-month tracking period, and are subject to review by the MPSC to determine if natural gas supply procurement activities were prudent. If the MPSC subsequently determines that a procurement activity was imprudent, recovery of such costs may be disallowed.
Montana Property Tax Tracker - We file an annual property tax tracker (including other state/local taxes and fees) with the MPSC for an automatic rate adjustment, which reflects the incremental property taxes since our last base rate filing adjusted for the associated income tax benefit.
Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism Pilot - In our 2018 Montana electric rate settlement, the MPSC approved a Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism Pilot (FCRM), intended to decouple our recovery of fixed, test-year based transmission, distribution, and production costs from sales of energy. At our request, the MPSC delayed implementation of the pilot until modifications are considered in our pending 2022 Montana electric and natural gas rate review filing.
SDPUC Regulation
Our South Dakota operations are subject to SDPUC jurisdiction with respect to rates, terms and conditions of service, accounting records, electric service territorial issues and other aspects of our electric and natural gas operations. Our retail electric rates, approved by the SDPUC, provide several options for residential, commercial and industrial customers, including dual-fuel, interruptible, special all-electric heating, and other special rates. Our retail natural gas tariffs include gas transportation rates for transportation through our distribution systems by customers and natural gas marketers from the interstate pipelines at which our systems take delivery to the end-user. Such transporting customers nominate the amount of natural gas to be delivered daily. On a daily basis, we monitor usage for these customers and balance it against their respective supply agreements.
An electric adjustment clause provides for quarterly adjustment based on differences in the delivered cost of energy, delivered cost of fuel, ad valorem taxes paid and commission-approved fuel incentives. The adjustment goes into effect upon filing, and is deemed approved within 10 days after the information filing unless the SDPUC staff requests changes during that period. A purchased gas adjustment provision in our natural gas rate schedules permits the monthly adjustment of charges to customers to reflect increases or decreases in purchased gas, gas transportation and ad valorem taxes.
NPSC Regulation
Our Nebraska natural gas rates and terms and conditions of service for residential and smaller commercial customers are regulated by the NPSC. High volume customers are not subject to such regulation, but can file complaints if they allege discriminatory treatment. Under the Nebraska State Natural Gas Regulation Act, a regulated natural gas utility may propose a change in rates to its regulated customers, if it files an application for a rate increase with the NPSC and with the communities in which it serves customers. The utility may negotiate with those communities for a settlement with regard to the proposed rate change if the affected communities representing more than 50 percent of the affected ratepayers agree to direct negotiations, or it may proceed to have the NPSC review the filing and make a determination. Our tariffs have been approved by the NPSC, and the NPSC has adopted certain rules governing the terms and conditions of service of regulated natural gas utilities. Our retail natural gas tariffs provide residential, general service and commercial and industrial options, as well as firm and interruptible transportation service. A purchased gas adjustment clause provides for biannual, or more often if needed, adjustments based on changes in gas supply and interstate pipeline transportation costs.
FERC Regulation
We are subject to FERC's jurisdiction and regulations with respect to rates for electric transmission service and electricity sold at wholesale, hydro licensing and operations, the issuance of certain securities, incurrence of certain long-term debt, and compliance with mandatory reliability standards, among other things. Under FERC's open access transmission policy, as owners of transmission facilities, we are required to provide open access to our transmission facilities under filed tariffs at cost-based rates. In addition, we are required to comply with FERC's Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers.
Our Montana wholesale transmission customers, such as cooperatives, industrial customers, and other customers that have third-party commodity supply providers, are served under our OATT, which is on file with FERC. The OATT defines the terms, conditions, and rates of our Montana transmission service, including ancillary services. Our South Dakota transmission operations are in the SPP, and transmission service is provided under the SPP OATT.
Our natural gas transportation pipelines are generally not subject to FERC's jurisdiction, although we are subject to state regulation. We conduct limited interstate transportation in Montana and South Dakota that is subject to FERC jurisdiction, and FERC has allowed the MPSC and SDPUC to set the rates for this interstate service. We have capacity agreements in South Dakota and Nebraska with interstate pipelines that are also subject to FERC jurisdiction.
Our hydroelectric generating facilities are licensed by the FERC and operated under the terms of those licenses and FERC regulations. In connection with the relicensing of these generating facilities, applicable law permits the FERC to issue a new license to the existing licensee, to a new licensee, or alternatively allows the U.S. government to take over the facility. If the existing licensee is not relicensed, it is compensated for its net investment in the facility, not to exceed the fair value of the property taken, plus reasonable severance damages to other property affected by the lack of relicensing.
Reliability Standards - We must comply with the standards and requirements that apply to the NERC functions for which we have registered in both the MRO for our South Dakota operations and the WECC for our Montana operations. WECC and the MRO have responsibility for monitoring and enforcing compliance with the FERC-approved mandatory reliability standards within their respective regions. We expect that the reliability standards will continue to evolve and change as a result of modifications, guidance, and clarification following industry implementation and ongoing audits and enforcement.
We are subject to public policies that promote competition and development of energy markets. Our industrial and large commercial customers have the ability to choose their electric supplier and may generate their own electricity. In addition, customers may have the option of substituting other fuels or relocating their facilities to a lower cost region. Customers have the opportunity to supply their own power with distributed generation including solar generation, and in Montana, can currently avoid paying for most of the fixed production, transmission and distribution costs incurred to serve them. These incentives and federal tax subsidies make distributed generating resources viable potential competitors to our electric service business.
In addition, the FERC has continued to promote competitive wholesale markets through open access transmission and other means. Our wholesale customers can purchase their output from generation resources of competing suppliers or non-contracted quantities and use the transmission systems to serve their load. There is also competition for available transmission capacity to meet our electric supply needs to serve customers.
The operation of electric generating, transmission and distribution facilities, and gas gathering, storage, transportation and distribution facilities, along with the development (involving site selection, environmental assessments, and permitting) and construction of these assets, are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental and land use laws and regulations. Our activities involve compliance with diverse laws and regulations that address emissions and impacts to the environment, including air and water, and protection of natural resources and wildlife. We monitor federal, state, and local environmental initiatives to determine potential impacts on our financial results. As new laws or regulations are issued, we assess their applicability and implement the necessary modifications to our facilities or their operation to maintain ongoing compliance.
To this end, the Biden Administration set ambitious goals to address climate change, including the goal of a carbon free power sector by 2035 and net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Executive Orders issued by the Biden Administration included initiatives and directives intended to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, address climate change and decarbonize the energy sector. These Executive Orders established climate considerations as key components of United States foreign policy and national security, established a White House Office of Domestic Climate policy as well as a National Climate Task Force, called for agency heads to identify any fossil fuel subsidies provided by their agencies and to take steps to ensure that federal funding is not directly subsidizing fossil fuels, and directed agencies to immediately review all regulations proposed or finalized by the Trump Administration that conflict with the Biden Administration’s objectives and to take action to rescind or revise those rules. Months later, President Biden officially rejoined the Paris Accord. More recently, President Biden's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 contain significant climate initiatives. These initiatives present
opportunities for federal grants and tax incentives intended to hasten the future economy-wide deployment of various GHG reducing technologies and approaches.
Implementation of these initiatives and directives has the potential to limit or curtail our operations, including the burning of fossil fuels at our coal-fired power plants. While we strive to comply with all environmental regulations applicable to our operations, it is not possible to determine when or to what extent additional facilities or modifications of existing or planned facilities will be required as a result of changes to energy and environmental laws and regulations, or new administrative or judicial interpretations or enforcement decisions regarding them.
Estimated capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in 2023 and 2024 are not expected to be material. For more information on environmental regulations and contingencies and related capital expenditures, see Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CORPORATE INFORMATION AND WEBSITE |
We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1923. Our Internet address is https://www.northwesternenergy.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, along with our annual report to shareholders and other information related to us, are available, free of charge, on our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the SEC. This information is available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Requests should be directed to: Investor Relations, NorthWestern Corporation, 3010 W. 69th Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108 and our telephone number is (605) 978-2900. References to our website in this report are provided as a convenience and do not constitute, and should not be viewed as, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on, or available through, the website. Therefore, such information should not be considered part of this report.
Our ability to achieve the objectives of our business strategy and serve our customers within our service territory depends on employing skilled individuals at all levels of our organization. We aspire to be an employer of choice by offering competitive salaries and benefits, providing a safe working environment, valuing diversity, fostering inclusion and encouraging a healthful work–life balance. Our success comes when employees feel empowered to take initiative, voice their opinions, and build on their experiences within our company and our communities.
As of December 31, 2022, we had 1,530 employees. Of these, 1,232 employees were in Montana and 298 were in South Dakota or Nebraska. Of our Montana employees, 454, or 37 percent, were covered by seven collective bargaining agreements involving five unions. During 2022, all seven collective bargaining agreements were renegotiated and a 4-year ratified agreement was reached. Each of the Montana collective bargaining agreements will now expire in 2026. Of our South Dakota and Nebraska employees, 165, or 56 percent, are covered by a collective bargaining agreement renegotiated in 2021 that expires in 2025. We consider our relations with employees to be good.
Talent Management
Attraction and retention of skilled employees is key to our ongoing success. We invest resources in maintaining a culture that supports the ongoing development of our workforce. This includes an integrated learning and performance management system which includes annual performance reviews that link goals and competencies together so that managers are able to provide a holistic view to employees in regards to their performance against goals as well as key competencies as they relate to their role in the organization. This process provides opportunities to develop and enhance skills and knowledge, and enables our employees to grow professionally and perform their duties in a safe and efficient manner. This structured training and development is intended to provide employees a consistent learning experience, and maximizes learning retention and background knowledge. We offer tuition reimbursement to promote continued professional growth for current employees, and a scholarship program for students attending universities, colleges, and technical schools in our service area to assist in developing current and future skills sets needed by our employees. We support annual pre-apprentice scholarships, recruit and hire suitable candidates from the program, serve as industry advisors on the program board and have donated training assets to support the program.
Compensation and Benefits
Our overarching compensation philosophy is structured to be consistent with our peers, and to align the long term interests of our employees, executives, shareholders, and customers so the pay appropriately reflects performance in achieving financial and non-financial operating objectives. We offer a competitive pay and benefits package, which is benchmarked on an annual basis to external market data. Beyond base pay and incentive compensation, we offer competitive, cost-effective, and well-rounded benefits, which aligns with our desire to be an employer of choice. From considerable employer retirement contributions, to generous paid time off (PTO), to health care and well-being programs, our benefits are designed to meet the varied needs of our employees.
We are committed to internal pay equity, and the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors monitors the relationship between the pay our executive officers receive and the pay our non-managerial employees receive. During 2022 and 2021, the compensation for our CEO was approximately 26 and 28 times, respectively, the compensation of our median employee.
We believe that a significant portion of an executive’s pay should be at risk in the form of performance-based incentive awards that are only paid if the individual and company performance targets are met. For 2022, approximately 79 percent of the targeted compensation of our CEO and about 65 percent of the targeted compensation of our other named executive officers is at risk in the form of performance-based incentive awards or time-based awards tied to the value of equity. Our Board of Directors establishes the metrics and targets for these incentive awards, based upon advice from the Board of Directors’ independent compensation consultant.
We engage nationally recognized outside compensation and benefits consulting firms to independently evaluate the effectiveness of our compensation and benefits programs and to provide benchmarking against our peers within the industry.
Diversity
We believe a diverse and inclusive workforce adds value and helps us succeed in an ever-changing environment. By embracing diversity and fostering inclusion, we aim to enable each employee, executive, and director to contribute fully to the company. We believe diversity is important because varied perspectives expand our ability to bring unique professional experiences to our business. Diversity in the workforce will be considered when relevant to hiring, promotions, work assignments, or other decisions related to the terms and conditions of employment. Our workforce reflects the relative diversity of our available talent in the communities we serve. Our employment data is tested annually by a third party as part of our Affirmative Action plan development to identify any needed corrective placement goals that are required. This testing determined that there is no current need to establish corrective placement goals in our plan.
We continue to maintain a diverse workforce, with an executive team that is 50% female and a board of directors that is 38% female and has one ethnically diverse member (13%). In addition, the equitable nature of our compensation practices has led to a low CEO to median employee ratio of 26 to 1. We have implemented methods to provide pay equity between our female and male employees performing equal or substantially similar work. We have engaged with a third party to review our pay equity between our male and female employees, share the results with our Board of Directors, and take corrective action as necessary. Our most recent study was performed in 2019, with no corrective action required.
Health and Safety
As stewards of critical infrastructure, providers of energy service, and members of the communities we serve, our priority is the health and safety of our employees and customers. Safety and health are considered and integrated into all work activities. We monitor several different key areas relating to safety philosophies and policies. These key metrics include the recordable incident rate (number of work-related injuries per 100 employees for a one-year period) and lost time incident rate (number of employees who lost time due to work-related injuries per 100 employees for a one-year period). During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, our recordable incident rates were 1.57 and 1.77 and lost time incident rates were 0.59 and 0.66 on a company wide basis. Our five-year average safety record for the year ended December 31, 2022 was better than our industry peer group's five-year average.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive Officer | | Current Title and Prior Employment | | Age(1) |
Brian B. Bird | | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director since January 2023; formerly President and Chief Operating Officer since February 2021 and Chief Financial Officer from December 2003 to February 2021. Mr. Bird also serves on the board of directors of a NorthWestern subsidiary. | | 60 |
| | | | |
Crystal D. Lail | | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2021; formerly Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since April 2020; and formerly Vice President and Controller from October 2015 to April 2020. | | 44 |
| | | | |
Michael R. Cashell | | Vice President - Transmission since May 2011. Mr. Cashell serves on the board of directors of a NorthWestern subsidiary. | | 60 |
| | | | |
John D. Hines | | Vice President - Supply and Montana Government Affairs since January 2018; formerly Vice President - Supply since May 2011. | | 64 |
| | | | |
Curtis T. Pohl | | Vice President - Asset Management & Business Development since September 2022; formerly Vice President - Distribution since May 2011. Mr. Pohl serves on the board of directors of a NorthWestern subsidiary. | | 58 |
| | | | |
Bobbi L. Schroeppel | | Vice President - Customer Care, Communications and Human Resources since May 2009. | | 54 |
| | | | |
Jeanne M. Vold | | Vice President - Technology since February 2021; formerly Business Technology Officer since 2012. | | 56 |
| | | | |
Jason C. Merkel | | Vice President - Distribution since September 2022; formerly General Manager - Operations and Construction since 2007. | | 55 |
| | | | |
Cyndee S. Fang | | Vice President - Regulatory Affairs since January 2023; formerly Director - Regulatory Affairs since March 2021; prior to joining the Company, she was Origination & Portfolio Design Manager from December 2020 to March 2021, Manager of Energy Research & Analysis from August 2018 to December 2020, and Manager of Customer Pricing from June 2017 to August 2018, in each case, for San Diego Gas and Electric Company, an electric and gas utility. | | 53 |
| | | | |
Shannon M. Heim | | Vice President - General Counsel and Federal Government Affairs since January 2023; formerly Director, Regulatory Corporate Counsel since June 2020; and formerly Equity Shareholder at the law firm of Moss & Barnett, P.A. from 2017 to 2020. | | 50 |
(1) As of February 10, 2023.
Officers are elected annually by, and hold office at the pleasure of the Board of Directors (Board), and do not serve a “term of office” as such.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risk factors described below, as well as all other information available to you, before making an investment in our common stock or other securities. Although the risks are organized by heading, and each risk is described separately, many of the risks are interrelated. You should not interpret the disclosure of any risk factor to imply that the risk has not already materialized. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the future.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory, Legislative and Legal Risks |
Our profitability depends on our ability to recover the costs of providing energy and utility services to our customers and earn a return on our capital investment in our utility operations. We are subject to potential unfavorable litigation, and state and federal regulatory outcomes. To the extent our incurred costs are deemed imprudent by the applicable regulatory commissions or certain regulatory mechanisms are not available, we may not recover some of our costs or collect them in a timely manner, which could adversely impact our results of operations and liquidity.
We are subject to comprehensive regulation by federal and state utility regulatory agencies, including siting and construction of facilities, customer service and rates that we can charge customers. Rate regulation is premised on providing an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital and rates are generally set through a process called a rate review (or rate case) in which the utility commission analyzes our costs incurred during a historical test year and decides whether they may be included in our base rates. In addition to formal general rate reviews, we also have cost tracking mechanisms that are intended to allow us to recover prudently incurred costs. There can be no assurance that the applicable regulatory commission will judge all of our costs to have been prudently incurred or that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will result in rates that allow us the opportunity to earn our authorized return or provide for timely and full recovery of such costs. In addition, each regulatory commission sets rates based in part upon their acceptance of an allocated share of total utility costs. When commissions adopt different methods to calculate inter-jurisdictional cost allocations, some costs may not be recovered. Differing schedules and regulatory practices between our state commissions and FERC expose us to the risk that we may not fully recover our costs due to timing of filings, specific calculations and issues such as cost allocation methodologies. Thus, the rates we are allowed to charge may or may not match our costs at any given time. Adverse regulatory rulings could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and materially affect our ability to meet our financial obligations, including debt payments and the payment of dividends on our common stock.
Historically, in Montana we have often sought and received a determination from the MPSC that acquisitions or additions to our generating portfolio were “pre-approved,” with subsequent investment subject to a later prudence determination. The Montana preapproval statute is currently the subject of litigation. If the preapproval statute is not ultimately upheld, there will be no explicit statutory mechanism that facilitates advanced approval of generating resource selection. Without preapproval, we may be subject to additional risk of non-recovery, which can increase debt costs and rates paid by customers.
We are also at risk of unfavorable litigation outcomes related to zoning and environmental permits. See discussion related to our Yellowstone County Generating Station below in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Significant Trends and Regulation.” Adverse litigation outcomes could delay or terminate projects, increase costs and impact our ability to service our customers.
We are subject to changing federal and state laws and regulations. Congress and state legislatures may enact legislation that adversely affects our operations and financial results.
We are subject to regulations under a wide variety of U.S. federal and state regulations and policies. Regulation affects almost every aspect of our business. Changes to federal and state laws and regulations are continuous and ongoing and the federal administration, the U.S. Congress, state legislatures and state administrations may enact and implement new laws and regulations that could adversely and materially affect us. For example, legislation and regulations may be enacted that require or facilitate alternative generation or storage which, in turn, could result in customers using less of our energy or facilities which could reduce our revenues and our growth opportunities. We cannot predict future changes in laws and regulations, how they will be implemented and interpreted, or the ultimate effect that this changing environment will have on us. There can be no assurance that laws, regulations and policies will not be changed in ways that have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We are subject to extensive and changing energy, and environmental laws and regulations, including legislative, judicial, and regulatory responses to climate change, with which compliance may be difficult and costly.
Our operations are subject to laws and regulations imposed by federal, state and local government authorities regarding energy policy, permitting/siting for energy projects, climate change, the environment, air and water quality, GHG emissions, protection of natural resources, migratory birds and other wildlife, solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental considerations. We believe that we are in compliance with environmental regulatory requirements.
In response to recent regulatory and judicial decisions and international accords, GHG emissions, most significantly CO2, could be restricted in the future as a result of federal or state legal requirements or litigation relating to GHG emissions. No rules are currently in effect that require us to reduce our GHG emissions. However, laws and regulations to which we must adhere change, and the Biden Administration’s agenda includes a significant shift in environmental and energy policy, focusing on reducing GHG emissions and addressing climate change issues. Together, these actions reflect climate change issues and GHG emissions as central areas of focus for domestic and international regulations, orders and policies. In addition, a parallel focus on reducing GHG emissions is reflected in legislation introduced in Congress. These initiatives could lead to new and revised energy and environmental laws and regulations, including tax reforms relating to energy and environmental issues. Any such changes, as well as any enforcement actions or judicial decisions regarding those laws and regulations, could result in significant additional compliance costs that would affect our future financial position, results of operations and cash flows if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates. Such changes also could affect the manner in which we conduct our business and could require us to make substantial additional capital expenditures or abandon certain projects.
Although previous attempts by the EPA to regulate GHG emissions from coal-fired plants have not succeeded, if GHG and/or methane regulations are implemented, compliance with carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance standards, and with other future environmental rules, may make it economically impractical to continue operating all or a portion of our jointly owned facilities or for individual owners to participate in their proportionate ownership of the coal-fired generating units. This could lead to significant impacts to customer rates for recovery of plant improvements and / or closure related costs and costs to procure replacement power. In addition, these changes could impact system reliability due to changes in generation sources.
To the extent that costs exceed our estimated environmental liabilities, or we are not successful in recovering remediation costs or costs to comply with the proposed or any future changes in rules or regulations, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected. Certain environmental laws and regulations also provide for substantial civil and criminal fines for noncompliance which, if imposed, could result in material costs or liabilities.
In addition, there is a risk of environmental damage claims from private parties or government entities. We may be required to make significant expenditures in connection with the investigation and remediation of alleged or actual spills, personal injury or property damage claims, and the repair, upgrade or expansion of our facilities to meet future requirements and obligations under environmental laws.
Early closure of our owned and jointly owned electric generating facilities due to environmental risks, litigation or public policy changes could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and liquidity.
While a majority of our Company-wide electric supply portfolio is carbon-free, it does include fossil-fuel resources. Environmental advocacy groups, certain investors and other third parties oppose the operation of fossil-fuel generation, expressing concerns about the environmental and climate-related impacts from fossil fuels. This opposition may increase in scope and frequency depending on a number of variables, including the course of Federal and State laws and environmental regulations and the financial resources devoted to opposition efforts. These risks include litigation against us due to GHG or other emissions or coal combustion residuals disposal and storage; activist shareholder proposals; and increased activism before our regulators. We cannot predict the effect that any such opposition may have on our ability to operate and recover the costs of our generating facilities. In addition, defense costs associated with litigation can be significant and an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures and could possibly require payment of substantial penalties or damages. Such payments or expenditures could affect results of operations, financial condition or cash flows if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates.
In particular, as described more fully below in Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies, we are a co-owner of Colstrip Unit 4. The remaining depreciable life of our investment in Colstrip Unit 4 is through 2042. Talen and Puget Sound Energy (Puget), a co-owner of Colstrip, have entered into a transaction in which Puget will transfer its 25% project share in Units 3 and 4 to Talen. The anticipated closing date of the transaction is December 31, 2025. On September 12, 2022, Puget issued a notice of the transaction, triggering a 90 day timeframe in which we, or other co-owners could exercise rights of first refusal arising under the Ownership and Operation Agreement relating to these units (the O&O Agreement). The co-owners subsequently agreed to extend the time to exercise rights of first refusal until February 22, 2023. On January 16, 2023 we entered into an
agreement with Avista Corporation pursuant to which it will transfer to us its 15% project share in Units 3 and 4 on December 31, 2025. Each of the co-owners will have 90 days following Avista's February 17, 2023 notice under the O&O Agreement, to exercise their rights of first refusal as to the Avista-NorthWestern transaction.
The closure by third parties of Billings area generation (Corette) and Colstrip Units 1 and 2 reducing supply, together with increased customer load and the lack of dispatchable replacement generation in eastern Montana, has accelerated concerns about potential difficulties in physically serving parts of Montana including the Billings area. We are executing on multi-year plans for upgrades to the Billings area substations and other delivery infrastructure, but the addition of dispatchable generation in the area is also critical to reliable service in eastern Montana.
Increased risks of regulatory penalties could negatively impact our business.
We must comply with established reliability standards and requirements including Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards, which apply to North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) functions. NERC reliability standards protect the nations’ bulk power system against potential disruptions from cyber and physical security breaches. The FERC, NERC, or a regional reliability organization may assess penalties against any responsible entity that violates their rules, regulations or standards. Penalties for the most severe violations can reach nearly $1.2 million per violation, per day. If a serious reliability incident or other incidence of noncompliance did occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating and financial results.
Additionally, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Occupational Safety and Health Administration and other federal or state agencies have penalty authority. In the event of serious incidents, these agencies have become more active in pursuing penalties. Some states have the authority to impose substantial penalties. If a serious reliability or safety incident did occur, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Federally mandated purchases of power from QFs, and integration of power generated from those projects in our system, may increase costs to our customers and decrease system reliability, limit our ability to make generation investments and adversely affect our business.
We are generally obligated under federal law to purchase power from certain QF projects, regardless of current load demand, availability of lower cost generation resources, transmission availability or market prices. Although some of these resources include a battery component, they are primarily intermittent generation whose prices may be in excess of market prices during times of lower customer demand, and may not be able to generate electricity during peak times. These resources typically do not meet the requirements set forth in our supply plans for resource procurement. These requirements to purchase supply that is inconsistent with customer need may have multiple impacts, including increasing the likelihood and frequency that we will be required to reduce output from owned generation resources, negatively impacting our ability to make our own generation investments and increasing the likelihood that we will need to upgrade or build additional transmission facilities to serve QF projects. Any of these results would increase costs to customers and impact our investment plan. Further, balancing load and power generation on our system is challenging, and we expect that operational costs will increase as a result of integration of these intermittent, non-dispatchable generation projects. If we are unable to timely recover those costs, those increased costs may negatively affect our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, requirements to procure power from these sources could impact our ability to make generation investments depending upon the number and size of QF contracts we ultimately enter into. The cost to procure power from these QFs may not be a cost effective resource for customers, or the type of generation resource needed, resulting in increased supply costs that are inconsistent with resource plans developed based on a lowest cost and least risk basis while placing upward pressure on overall customer bills. This may impact our investment plans and financial condition. Finally, the requirement to procure power from these QF sources may impact our transmission system and require additional transmission facilities to be developed in order to integrate these resources, which also can impact overall customer bills.
Our electric and natural gas operations involve numerous activities that may result in accidents, fires, system outages and other operating risks and costs that are unique to our industry.
Inherent in our electric transmission and distribution and natural gas transmission and distribution operations are a variety of hazards and operating risks, such as breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, interruptions in fuel supply, supply chain interruptions, labor disputes, operator error, and catastrophic events such as fires, electric contacts, leaks, explosions, floods and intentional acts of destruction. For our natural gas lines located near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, the level of potential damages resulting from these risks could be significant. These risks could cause a loss of human life, facility shutdown or significant damage to property, service interruption, loss of customer load, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations, and substantial financial losses to us and others.
Fire risk is significant in the western United States, including in our service territory. Various factors in recent years have contributed to increasing fire risk including dead and dying trees, warmer air temperatures, drought, wind, forest management practices, and land management practices. These factors increase the risk of a fire in both forests and grasslands. In forested areas, this issue has been heightened by mountain pine beetle and other infestations weakening and killing trees in our service territory. Worsening conditions as a result of climate change may increase the likelihood and magnitude of damages that may be caused by fires. Residential and commercial development into the wildland-urban interface has also led to an increasing trend in the degree of destruction from wildfires.
Fires alleged to have been caused by our equipment potentially expose us to significant penalties and/or damage awards based on claims of strict liability, negligence, gross negligence, inverse condemnation, nuisance, trespass and others. Our equipment has been alleged to be involved in igniting wildfires although none have had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
For our electric generating facilities, operational risks include facility shutdowns due to breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, interruptions in fuel supply, labor disputes, operator error, catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, floods, and intentional acts of destruction or other similar occurrences affecting the electric generating facilities; and operational changes necessitated by environmental legislation, litigation or regulation. The loss of a major electric generating facility would require us to find other sources of supply or ancillary services, if available, and expose us to higher purchased power costs and potential litigation which may not be recovered from customers.
We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Additionally, during peak-load periods our electric and natural gas systems in Montana are constrained. These constraints limit our ability to transmit electric energy within Montana and access electric energy from outside the service area. Our electric transmission facilities are also interconnected with those of third parties, and thus operation of these facilities could be adversely affected by unexpected or uncontrollable events. Our natural gas system is also constrained, which limits our on-system deliverability and the ability to transport gas. We are similarly exposed to risk of interconnection with third-party pipelines and are dependent upon their operation to serve customers. These transmission constraints and events could result in failure to provide reliable service to customers due to the inability to deliver energy supply resources, or could result in significant cost increases due to the inability to access lower cost sources of energy supply.
Our electric and natural gas portfolios rely significantly on market purchases. This exposure adversely affects our ability to manage our operational requirements to reliably serve our customers, while exposing us to market volatility, which ultimately could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.
We are obligated to supply power to retail customers and certain wholesale customers and procure natural gas to supply fuel for our natural gas fired generation. Our need to acquire flexible energy supply and capacity in the market to meet our electric and natural gas load serving obligations exposes us to certain risks including the ability to reliably serve customers and significant uncertainty in the cost of supply, which may not be recoverable. We rely upon a combination of base-load supply from our owned generation and market purchases to serve customers. The accredited capacity of our Montana portfolio of owned and long-term contracted electric generation resources covers 75 percent of our recent peak electric requirements, with remaining needs, including additional reserve margin, served through market purchases. In the past, Montana had been a net exporter of electric generation and we have relied upon Montana's excess generation for grid reliability and to physically serve customers. However, that situation in Montana has changed and we are predominantly a net importer, especially during peak demand. A significant number of base-load generation facilities, which may also serve to meet peak requirements, in the state and region have been retired or are scheduled to be retired in the next five to ten years. This includes Colstrip Units 1 and 2,
representing 614 MWs of generation on a capacity basis, which ceased operations in January 2020. A decrease in the state and region’s electric capacity, whether for operational reasons or litigation outcomes, may impair the reliability of the grid, particularly during peak demand periods. There can be no assurance that there will be available counterparties to contract with to serve our customers' needs, or that these counterparties will fulfill their obligations to us. There is also no assurance that the transmission capacity required to import market purchases will be available on transmission systems owned by us or by third parties. In addition, the suppliers under these agreements may experience financial or operational problems that inhibit their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. These conditions could result in an inability to physically deliver electricity to our customers. Losing electric service during extreme conditions carries significant consequences, as without our services our customers may be subjected to dire circumstances.
Commodity pricing is an inherent risk component of our business operations and our financial results. Even though rate regulation is premised on full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that our costs are recoverable as discussed above. The prevailing market prices for electricity may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time, potentially adversely impacting our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows due to our need for market purchases and the sharing component of the Montana PCCAM. During 2022, market prices for electricity and natural gas in peak periods were increasingly volatile, resulting in a significant under-collection of these costs impacting our results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, our natural gas system serves both retail customers and the needs of natural gas fired electric generation. The natural gas system has capacity constraints that expose us to risks to be able to deliver natural gas during periods of peak demand.
Fluctuations in actual weather conditions, generation availability, transmission constraints, and generation reserve margins may all have an impact on market prices for energy and capacity and the electricity consumption of our customers on a given day. Extreme weather conditions may force us to purchase electricity in the short-term market on days when weather is unexpectedly severe, and the pricing for market energy may be significantly higher on such days than the cost of electricity in our existing generation and contracts. Unusually mild weather conditions could leave us with excess power which may be sold in the market at a loss if the market price is lower than the cost of electricity in our existing contracts.
Weather and weather patterns, including normal seasonal and quarterly fluctuations of weather, as well as extreme weather events that might be associated with climate change, could adversely affect our ability to manage our operational requirements to serve our customers, and ultimately adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.
Our electric and natural gas utility business is seasonal, and weather patterns can have a material impact on our financial performance. Demand for electricity and natural gas is often greater in the summer and winter months associated with cooling and heating. Because natural gas is heavily used for residential and commercial heating, the demand for this product depends heavily upon weather patterns throughout our market areas, and a significant amount of natural gas revenues are recognized in the first and fourth quarters related to the heating season. Accordingly, our operations have historically generated less revenue and income when weather conditions are milder in the winter and cooler in the summer. Unusually mild winters or cool summers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position. In addition, exceptionally hot summer weather or unusually cold winter weather could add significantly to working capital needs to fund higher than normal supply purchases to meet customer demand for electricity and natural gas. Our sensitivity to weather volatility is significant due to the absence of regulatory mechanisms, such as those authorizing revenue decoupling, lost margin recovery, and other innovative rate designs.
Severe weather impacts, including but not limited to, blizzards, thunderstorms, high winds, microbursts, floods, fires, tornadoes and snow or ice storms can disrupt energy generation, transmission and distribution. We derive a significant portion of our energy supply from hydroelectric facilities, and the availability of water can significantly affect operations. Higher temperatures may decrease the Montana snowpack and impact the timing of run-off and may require us to purchase replacement power. Dry conditions, which exist in the West and in our service territory, also increase the threat of fires, which could threaten our communities and electric distribution and transmission lines and facilities. In addition, fires that are alleged to have been caused by our system could expose us to substantial property damage and other claims. Any damage caused as a result of fires could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The physical risks of climate change could include changes in weather conditions, such as changes in the amount or type of precipitation and extreme weather events. Climate change and the costs that may be associated with its impacts have the potential to affect our business in many ways, including increasing the cost incurred in providing electricity and natural gas, impacting the demand for and consumption of electricity and natural gas (due to change in both costs and weather patterns), and affecting the economic health of the regions in which we operate.
Extreme weather conditions, especially those of prolonged duration, create high energy demand on our own and/or other systems and increase the risk we may be unable to reliably serve customers, causing brownouts and/or blackouts of our electric systems, and loss of gas supply. Risk of losing electricity or gas supply during extreme weather carries significant consequences as without our services our customers may be subjected to dire circumstances. Additionally, extreme weather conditions may raise market prices as we buy short-term energy to serve our own system. To the extent the frequency of extreme weather events increase, this could increase our cost of providing service. In addition, we may not recover all costs related to mitigating these physical and financial risks.
Our results of operations may be impacted by disruptions to fuel supply or the electric grid that are beyond our control.
We are exposed to risks related to performance of contractual obligations by our suppliers, which includes parties transporting natural gas. We are dependent on coal and natural gas for a significant portion of our electric generating capacity. We rely on suppliers to deliver coal and natural gas in accordance with short- and long-term contracts. We have certain supply and transportation contracts in place; however, there can be no assurance that the counterparties to these agreements will fulfill their obligations to supply and deliver coal and natural gas to us. For instance, there currently is litigation pending relating to adequacy of certain permits for the Rosebud Mine in Montana, which supplies coal to Colstrip and contains significant quantities of coal. In order to operate the Colstrip facility through its currently identified retirement date of 2042, it will be necessary to identify and contract for coal supply subsequent to expiration of our current contract. Moreover, the suppliers under these agreements may experience financial or technical problems that inhibit their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. In addition, the suppliers under these agreements may not be required to supply or transport coal and natural gas to us under certain circumstances, such as in the event of a natural disaster. Deliveries may be subject to short-term interruptions or reductions due to various factors, including transportation problems, weather, availability of equipment and labor shortages. Failure or delay by our suppliers of coal and natural gas deliveries could disrupt our ability to deliver electricity and require us to incur additional expenses to meet the needs of our customers.
Also, because our generation and transmission systems are part of an interconnected regional grid, we face the risk of possible loss of business due to a disruption or black-out caused by an event such as a severe storm, generator or transmission facility outage on a neighboring system or the actions of a neighboring utility. Any such disruption could result in a significant decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair assets, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by customer growth and usage in our service territories and may fluctuate with current economic conditions or response to price increases. We are also impacted by market conditions outside of our service territories related to demand for transmission capacity and wholesale electric pricing.
Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by customer growth and usage, which can be impacted by a number of factors, including the voluntary reduction of consumption of electricity and natural gas by our customers in response to increases in prices and demand-side management programs, economic conditions impacting decreases in their disposable income, and the use of distributed generation resources or other emerging technologies for electricity. Advances in distributed generation technologies that produce power, including fuel cells, micro-turbines, wind turbines and solar cells, may reduce the cost of alternative methods of producing power to a level competitive with central power station electric production. Customer-owned generation itself reduces the amount of electricity purchased from utilities and may have the effect of inappropriately increasing rates generally and increasing rates for customers who do not own generation, unless retail rates are designed to collect distribution grid costs across all customers in a manner that reflects the benefit from their use. Such developments could affect the price of energy, could affect energy deliveries as customer-owned generation becomes more cost-effective, could require further improvements to our distribution systems to address changing load demands and could make portions of our electric system power supply and transmission and/or distribution facilities obsolete prior to the end of their useful lives. Such technologies could also result in further declines in commodity prices or demand for delivered energy.
Decreasing use per customer (driven, for example, by appliance and lighting efficiency) and the availability of cost-effective distributed generation, put downward pressure on load growth. Reductions in usage, attributable to various factors could materially affect our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows through, among other things, reduced operating revenues, increased operating and maintenance expenses, and increased capital expenditures, as well as potential asset impairment charges or accelerated depreciation and decommissioning expenses over shortened remaining asset useful lives.
Demand for our Montana transmission capacity fluctuates with regional demand, fuel prices and weather related conditions. The levels of wholesale sales depend on the wholesale market price, market participants, transmission availability, the availability of generation, and the ongoing development of the Western Energy Imbalance Market, among other factors.
Declines in wholesale market price, availability of generation, transmission constraints in the wholesale markets, or low wholesale demand could reduce wholesale sales. These events could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Cyber and physical attacks, threats of terrorism and catastrophic events that could result from terrorism, or individuals and/or groups attempting to disrupt our business, or the businesses of third parties, may affect our operations in unpredictable ways and could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations. Failure to maintain the security of personally identifiable information could adversely affect us.
Business Operations - We are subject to the potentially adverse operating and financial effects of terrorist acts and threats, as well as cyber attacks, physical security breaches and other disruptive activities of individuals or groups, and theft of our critical infrastructure information. Our generation, transmission and distribution facilities are deemed critical infrastructure and provide the framework for our service infrastructure. Cyber crime, which includes the use of malware, phishing attempts, computer viruses, and other means for disruption or unauthorized access has increased in frequency, scope, and potential impact in recent years. Our assets and the information technology systems on which they depend could be direct targets of, or indirectly affected by, cyber attacks and other disruptive activities, including those that impact third party facilities that are interconnected to us. Any significant interruption of these assets or systems could prevent us from fulfilling our critical business functions including delivering energy to our customers, and sensitive, confidential and other data could be compromised.
Security threats continue to evolve and transform. The risk of cyber-based attacks is heightened due to recent geopolitical events as well as employees working and accessing our technology infrastructure remotely. We and our third-party vendors have been subject to, and will likely continue to be subject to, attempts to gain unauthorized access to systems, to confidential data, or to disrupt operations. With the continuing rise in ransomware and other cyber-based threats we have been analyzing our technology platforms and monitoring for signs of potential intrusions. We have also been reaching out to our vendors, suppliers and contractors requesting that they take appropriate measures. None of these attempts has individually or in the aggregate resulted in a security incident with a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. However, despite implementation of security and control measures, there can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent the unauthorized access of our systems and data, or the disruption of our operations, either of which could have a material impact.
These events, and governmental actions in response, could result in a material decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair and insure assets, and could adversely affect our operations by contributing to the disruption of supplies and markets for electricity, natural gas, oil and other fuels. These events could also impair our ability to raise capital by contributing to financial instability and reduced economic activity.
Personally Identifiable Information - Our information systems and those of our third-party vendors contain confidential information, including information about customers and employees. Customers, shareholders, and employees expect that we will adequately protect their personal information. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding. A data breach involving theft, improper disclosure, or other unauthorized access to or acquisition of confidential information could subject us to penalties for violation of applicable privacy laws, claims by third parties, and enforcement actions by government agencies. It could also reduce the value of proprietary information, and harm our reputation.
We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We may have difficulty cost-effectively completing certain operations activities and construction projects due to inflationary pressures or if our third-party business partners are unable to deliver ordered supplies or complete contracted services timely, including workforce shortages or macro supply chain disruptions.
We place significant reliance on our third-party business partners to supply materials, equipment and labor necessary for us to operate our utility and reliably serve current customers and future customers. As a result of current macroeconomic conditions, both nationally and globally, we have recently experienced issues with our supply chain for materials and components used in our operations and capital project construction activities. Issues include higher prices, scarcities/shortages, longer fulfillment times for orders from our suppliers, workforce availability, and wage increases. Should these economic conditions and issues continue, we could have difficulty completing the operational activities necessary to serve our customers safely and reliably, and/or achieving our capital investment program, which ultimately could result in higher customer utility rates, longer outages, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operations.
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could affect our operations.
We require skilled labor to perform specialized utility functions. Turnover of key employees without appropriate replacements may lead to operating challenges and increased costs. Some of the challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge, and time required for replacement employees to develop necessary skills. Wage inflation nationally and increased competitive labor markets may make it difficult to attract employees. Failure to identify qualified replacement employees could result in decreased productivity and increased safety costs. If we are unable to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, our operations could be negatively affected. We are also subject to multiple collective bargaining agreements. Future negotiation of these collective bargaining agreements could lead to work stoppages or other disruptions to our operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A pandemic or similar widespread public health concern could have a material negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The actual or perceived effects of a disease outbreak, epidemic, pandemic or similar widespread public health concern, such as COVID-19, will likely negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread impacts on people, economies, businesses and financial markets.
While the COVID-19 pandemic did not cause material disruptions to our operations, we could experience such disruptions in the future as a result of a pandemic (or a similar widespread public health concern) due to, among other things, quarantines, increased cyber risk due to employees working from home, worker absenteeism as a result of illness or other factors, social distancing measures and other travel, health-related, business or other restrictions. If a significant percentage of our workforce is unable to work, including because of illness, travel restrictions, or government mandates in connection with pandemics or disease outbreaks, our operations may be negatively affected.
Any such workforce implications and / or limitations or closures impact our ability to achieve our capital investment program and could have a material adverse impact on our ability to serve our customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liquidity and Financial Risks |
Our plans for future expansion through the acquisition of assets, capital improvements to existing assets, generation investments, and transmission grid expansion involve substantial risks.
Our business strategy includes significant investment in capital improvements and additions to modernize existing infrastructure, generation investments and transmission capacity expansion. The completion of generation and natural gas investments and transmission projects are subject to many construction and development risks, including, but not limited to, risks related to permitting, financing, regulatory recovery, escalating costs of materials and labor, meeting construction budgets and schedules, and environmental compliance. In addition, these capital projects may require a significant amount of capital expenditures. We cannot provide certainty that adequate external financing will be available to support such projects. Additionally, borrowings incurred to finance construction may adversely impact our leverage, which could increase our cost of capital.
Acquisitions include a number of risks, including but not limited to, regulatory approval, regulatory conditions, additional costs, the assumption of material liabilities, the diversion of our attention from daily operations to the integration of the acquisition, difficulties in assimilation and retention of employees, and securing adequate capital to support the transaction. The regulatory process in which rates are determined may not result in rates that produce full recovery of our investments, or a reasonable rate of return. Uncertainties also exist in assessing the value, risks, profitability, and liabilities associated with certain businesses or assets and there is a possibility that anticipated operating and financial synergies expected to result from an acquisition do not develop. The failure to successfully integrate future acquisitions that we may choose to undertake could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Access to capital markets is critical to our operations and our capital structure. Increasing interest rates could have a material negative impact on our financial condition.
We have significant capital requirements that we expect to fund, in part, by accessing capital markets. As such, the state of financial markets and credit availability in the global, U.S. and regional economies impacts our financial condition. We could experience increased borrowing costs or limited access to capital on reasonable terms. We access long-term capital markets to finance capital expenditures, repay maturing long-term debt and obtain additional working capital from time-to-time. For example, we have $145 million of 2% Montana secured debt maturing in 2023. Our ability to access capital on reasonable terms is subject to numerous factors and market conditions, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to obtain capital on reasonable terms, it may limit or prohibit our ability to finance capital expenditures and repay maturing long-term debt. Our liquidity needs could exceed our short-term credit availability and lead to defaults on various financing arrangements. We would also likely be prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock.
We are subject to financial risks associated with the transition to a lower carbon economy.
The risks related to our transition to a lower-carbon economy, creates financial risk. Transition risks represent those risks related to the social and economic changes needed to shift toward a lower carbon future. These risks are often interconnected, representing policy and regulatory changes, technology and market risks, and risks to our reputation and financial performance.
Potential regulation associated with climate change legislation could pose financial risks to us. The U.S. is a party to the United Nations' "Paris Agreement" on climate change, and that agreement along with other potential legislation and regulation discussed above, could result in enforceable GHG emission reduction requirements that could lead to increased compliance costs for us. For example, the EPA has indicated that it is currently "evaluating additional opportunities" to reduce GHG emissions from existing power plants.
As we expand our energy generation asset mix, the ability to integrate renewable technologies into our operations and maintain reliability and affordability is a risk. The intermittency of renewables remains a critical challenge particularly as cost-efficient energy storage is still in development. Other technology risks include the need for significant upfront financial investments, lengthy development timelines, and the uncertainty of integration and scalability across our entire service territory.
To the extent that any climate change adversely affects the national or regional economic health through physical impacts or increased rates caused by the inclusion of additional regulatory costs, CO2 taxes or imposed costs, we may be adversely impacted. There are also increasing risks for energy companies from shareholders currently invested in fossil-fuel energy companies concerned about the potential effects of climate change who may elect in the future to shift some or all of their
investments into entities that emit lower levels of GHG emissions or into non-energy related sectors. Institutional investors and lenders who provide financing to fossil-fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable investing and lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies. To the extent financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a financial risk, this could negatively affect our ability to access capital markets or cause us to receive less than ideal terms and conditions.
We may be subject to financial risks from private party litigation relating to GHG emissions. Defense costs associated with such litigation can be significant and an adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures and could possibly require payment of substantial penalties or damages. Such payments or expenditures could affect results of operations, financial condition or cash flows if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates.
We must meet certain credit quality standards. If we are unable to maintain investment grade credit ratings, our liquidity, access to capital and operations could be materially adversely affected.
A downgrade of our credit ratings to less than investment grade could adversely affect our liquidity. We continue to maintain our investment grade credit ratings. During a 2022 review process, Fitch Ratings downgraded our rating with a stable outlook. Certain of our credit agreements and other credit arrangements with counterparties require us to provide collateral in the form of letters of credit or cash to support our obligations if we fall below investment grade. Also, a downgrade below investment grade could hinder our ability to raise capital on favorable terms and would increase our borrowing costs. Higher interest rates on borrowings with variable interest rates could also have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our obligation to include a minimum annual quantity of power in our Montana electric supply portfolio at an agreed upon price per MWH could expose us to material commodity price risk if certain QFs under contract with us do not perform during a time of high commodity prices, as we are required to make up the difference. In addition, we are subject to price escalation risk with one of the largest QF contracts.
As part of a stipulation in 2002 with the MPSC and other parties, we agreed to include a minimum annual quantity of power in our Montana electric supply portfolio at an agreed upon price per MWH through June 2029. This obligation is reflected in the electric QF liability, which reflects the unrecoverable costs associated with these specific QF contracts per the stipulation. The annual minimum energy requirement is achievable under normal operations of these facilities, including normal periods of planned and forced outages. However, to the extent the supplied power for any year does not reach the minimum quantity set forth in the settlement, we are obligated to purchase the difference from other sources. The anticipated source for any shortfall is the wholesale market, which would subject us to commodity price risk if the cost of replacement power is higher than contracted rates.
In addition, we are subject to price escalation risk with one of the largest contracts included in the electric QF liability due to variable contract terms. In recording the electric QF liability, we estimate an annual escalation rate over the remaining term of the contract (through June 2024). To the extent the annual escalation rate exceeds our estimate, our results of operations, cash flows and financial position could be adversely affected.
Changes in tax law may significantly impact our business.
We are subject to taxation by the various taxing authorities at the federal, state and local levels where we operate. Similar to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, sweeping legislation or regulation could be enacted by any of these governmental authorities which may affect our tax burden. Changes may include numerous provisions that affect businesses, including changes to corporate tax rates, business-related exclusions, and deductions and credits. The outcome of regulatory proceedings regarding the extent to which a change in corporate tax rate will affect our utility customers and the time period over which that change will occur could significantly impact future earnings and cash flows. Separately, a challenge by a taxing authority, changes in taxing authorities’ administrative interpretations, decisions, policies and positions, our ability to utilize tax benefits such as carryforwards or tax credits, or a deviation from other tax-related assumptions may cause actual financial results to deviate from previous estimates and therefore may impact our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
We are subject to counterparty credit risk.
We enter into transactions to buy and sell power, natural gas, and transmission service. We could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market value of these contracts or if a counterparty fails to perform. Certain of these contracts may result in the receipt of, or posting of, collateral with counterparties. Fluctuations in commodity prices that lead to the posting of collateral with counterparties negatively impact liquidity, and downgrades in our credit ratings may lead to additional collateral posting requirements.
We are a participant in the energy markets, including the EIM, and engage in direct and indirect power purchase and sale transactions in connection with that participation. The EIM has collateral posting requirements based on established credit criteria, but there is no assurance the collateral will be sufficient to cover obligations that counterparties may owe each other in the EIM and any such credit losses could be socialized to all EIM participants, including us. A significant failure of a participant in the EIM to make payments when due on its obligations could have a ripple effect on various of our counterparties in the power and gas markets if those counterparties experience ancillary liquidity issues, and could generally result in a decline in the ability of our counterparties to perform on their obligations.
We also extend credit to our customers in the ordinary course of business in each of our operating segments. Our customers' ability to pay depends on a variety of factors including macroeconomic conditions, local economic conditions, including unemployment rates, and industry conditions in which our commercial and industrial customers operate. Increased customer delinquencies and bad debts could adversely impact our operating results and liquidity.
Poor investment performance of plan assets of our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans, in addition to other factors impacting these costs, could unfavorably impact our results of operations and liquidity.
Our costs for providing defined benefit retirement and postretirement benefit plans are dependent upon a number of factors. Assumptions related to future costs, return on investments and interest rates have a significant impact on our funding requirements related to these plans. These estimates and assumptions may change based on economic conditions, actual stock market performance and changes in governmental regulations. Without sustained growth in the plan assets over time and depending upon interest rate changes as well as other factors noted above, the costs of such plans reflected in our results of operations and financial position and cash funding obligations may change significantly from projections.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our material properties include electric generating facilities, electric transmission and distribution lines, and natural gas production, transmission and distribution lines, which are described in Item 1 under Electric Operations and Natural Gas Operations. Substantially all of our Montana electric and natural gas assets are subject to the lien of our Montana First Mortgage Bond indenture. Substantially all of our South Dakota and Nebraska electric and natural gas assets are subject to the lien of our South Dakota Mortgage Bond indenture.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We discuss details of our legal proceedings in Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Some of this information is about costs or potential costs that may be material to our financial results.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Nature of Operations and Basis of Consolidation |
NorthWestern Corporation, doing business as NorthWestern Energy, provides electricity and / or natural gas to approximately 764,200 customers in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska and Yellowstone National Park. We have generated and distributed electricity in South Dakota and distributed natural gas in South Dakota and Nebraska since 1923 and have generated and distributed electricity and distributed natural gas in Montana since 2002.
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods included herein have been prepared by NorthWestern Corporation (NorthWestern, we or us), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts together with those of our wholly and majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated from the Consolidated Financial Statements. Events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2022, have been evaluated as to their potential impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements through the date of issuance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) Significant Accounting Policies |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for such items as long-lived asset values and impairment charges, long-lived asset useful lives, tax provisions, uncertain tax position reserves, asset retirement obligations, regulatory assets and liabilities, allowances for uncollectible accounts, our QF liability, environmental liabilities, unbilled revenues and actuarially determined benefit costs and liabilities. We revise the recorded estimates when we receive better information or when we can determine actual amounts. Those revisions can affect operating results.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue as customers obtain control of promised goods and services in an amount that reflects consideration expected in exchange for those goods or services. Generally, the delivery of electricity and natural gas results in the transfer of control to customers at the time the commodity is delivered and the amount of revenue recognized is equal to the amount billed to each customer, including estimated volumes delivered when billings have not yet occurred.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of funds held in trust accounts to satisfy the requirements of certain stipulation agreements and insurance reserve requirements.
Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable are net of allowances for uncollectible accounts of $2.5 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Receivables include unbilled revenues of $117.4 million and $98.1 million at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at average cost. Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Materials and supplies | $ | 71,769 | | | $ | 54,137 | |
Storage gas and fuel | 35,590 | | | 26,477 | |
Total Inventories | $ | 107,359 | | | $ | 80,614 | |
Regulation of Utility Operations
Our regulated operations are subject to the provisions of ASC 980, Regulated Operations. Regulated accounting is appropriate provided that (i) rates are established by or subject to approval by independent, third-party regulators, (ii) rates are designed to recover the specific enterprise's cost of service, and (iii) in view of demand for service, it is reasonable to assume that rates are set at levels that will recover costs and can be charged to and collected from customers.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the effects of the different rate making principles followed by the jurisdictions regulating us. The economic effects of regulation can result in regulated companies recording costs that have been, or are deemed probable to be, allowed in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which the costs would be charged to expense by an unregulated enterprise. When this occurs, costs are deferred as regulatory assets and recorded as expenses in the periods when those same amounts are reflected in rates. Additionally, regulators can impose liabilities upon a regulated company for amounts previously collected from customers and for amounts that are expected to be refunded to customers (regulatory liabilities).
If we were required to terminate the application of these provisions to our regulated operations, all such deferred amounts would be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income at that time. This would result in a charge to earnings and accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL), net of applicable income taxes, which could be material. In addition, we would determine any impairment to the carrying costs of deregulated plant and inventory assets.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. All derivatives are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value unless they qualify for certain exceptions, including the normal purchases and normal sales exception. Additionally, derivatives that qualify and are designated for hedge accounting are classified as either hedges of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair-value hedge) or hedges of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash-flow hedge). For fair-value hedges, changes in fair values for both the derivative and the underlying hedged exposure are recognized in earnings each period. For cash-flow hedges, the portion of the derivative gain or loss that is effective in offsetting the change in the cost or value of the underlying exposure is deferred in AOCL and later reclassified into earnings when the underlying transaction occurs. Gains and losses from the ineffective portion of any hedge are recognized in earnings immediately. For other derivative contracts that do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recognized in earnings each period. Cash inflows and outflows related to derivative instruments are included as a component of operating, investing or financing cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, depending on the underlying nature of the hedged items. As of December 31, 2022, the only derivative instruments we have qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales exception.
Revenues and expenses on contracts that are designated as normal purchases and normal sales are recognized when the underlying physical transaction is completed. While these contracts are considered derivative financial instruments, they are not required to be recorded at fair value, but on an accrual basis of accounting. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts where physical delivery is probable, quantities are expected to be used or sold in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time, and price is not tied to an unrelated underlying derivative. As part of our regulated electric and gas operations, we enter into contracts to buy and sell energy to meet the requirements of our customers. These contracts include short-term and long-term commitments to purchase and sell energy in the retail and wholesale markets with the intent and ability to deliver or take delivery. If it were determined that a transaction designated as a normal purchase or a normal sale no longer met the exceptions, the fair value of the related contract would be reflected as an asset or liability and immediately recognized through earnings. See Note 8 - Risk Management and Hedging Activities, for further discussion of our derivative activity.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at original cost, including contracted services, direct labor and material, AFUDC, and indirect charges for engineering, supervision and similar overhead items. All expenditures for maintenance and repairs of utility property, plant and equipment are charged to the appropriate maintenance expense accounts. A betterment or replacement of a unit of property is accounted for as an addition and retirement of utility plant. At the time of such a retirement, the accumulated provision for depreciation is charged with the original cost of the property retired and also for the net cost of removal. Also included in plant and equipment are assets under finance lease, which are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments.
AFUDC represents the cost of financing construction projects with borrowed funds and equity funds. While cash is not realized currently from such allowance, it is realized under the ratemaking process over the service life of the related property through increased revenues resulting from a higher rate base and higher depreciation expense. The component of AFUDC attributable to borrowed funds is included as a reduction to interest expense, while the equity component is included in other income. This rate averaged 6.4%, 6.6%, and 6.7% for Montana for 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. This rate averaged 6.4%, 6.4%, and 6.7% for South Dakota for 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. AFUDC capitalized totaled $20.2 million, $15.9 million, and $9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, for Montana and South Dakota combined.
We record provisions for depreciation at amounts substantially equivalent to calculations made on a straight-line method by applying various rates based on useful lives of the various classes of properties (ranging from 2 to 96 years) determined from engineering studies. As a percentage of the depreciable utility plant at the beginning of the year, our provision for depreciation of utility plant was approximately 2.8% for 2022, 2021, and 2020.
Depreciation rates include a provision for our share of the estimated costs to decommission our jointly owned plants at the end of the useful life. The annual provision for such costs is included in depreciation expense, while the accumulated provisions are included in noncurrent regulatory liabilities.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
We have liabilities under defined benefit retirement plans and a postretirement plan that offers certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible employees and their dependents. The costs of these plans are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates, including determination of discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of future compensation increases, age and mortality and employment periods. In determining the projected benefit obligations and costs, assumptions can change from period to period and may result in material changes in the cost and liabilities we recognize.
Accrued Expenses and other
Accrued expenses and other consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Property taxes | $ | 96,093 | | | $ | 86,168 | |
Employee compensation, benefits, and withholdings | 44,104 | | | 44,743 | |
Customer advances | 26,137 | | | 29,013 | |
Interest | 18,350 | | | 18,568 | |
Other (none of which is individually significant) | 65,895 | | | 54,859 | |
Total Accrued Expenses | $ | 250,579 | | | $ | 233,351 | |
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Other noncurrent liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Pension and other employee benefits | $ | 84,731 | | | $ | 96,151 | |
Customer advances | 95,393 | | | 80,780 | |
Future QF obligation, net | 49,728 | | | 64,943 | |
Asset retirement obligations | 39,096 | | | 38,350 | |
Environmental | 22,662 | | | 23,395 | |
Other (none of which is individually significant) | 63,793 | | | 65,700 | |
Total Noncurrent Liabilities | $ | 355,403 | | | $ | 369,319 | |
Income Taxes
We follow the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent the future effects on income taxes from temporary differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The probability of realizing deferred tax assets is based on forecasts of future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies that can be implemented, if necessary, to realize deferred tax assets. We establish a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all, or a portion of, a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Exposures exist related to various tax filing positions, which may require an extended period of time to resolve and may result in income tax adjustments by taxing authorities. We have reduced deferred tax assets or established liabilities based on our best estimate of future probable adjustments related to these exposures. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate exposures in light of any additional information and make adjustments as necessary to reflect the best estimate of the future outcomes. We believe our deferred tax assets and established liabilities are appropriate for estimated exposures; however, actual results may differ from these estimates. The resolution of tax matters in a particular future period could have a material impact on our Consolidated Income Statements and provision for income taxes.
Environmental Costs
We record environmental costs when it is probable we are liable for the costs and we can reasonably estimate the liability. We may defer costs as a regulatory asset if there is precedent for recovering similar costs from customers in rates. Otherwise, we expense the costs. If an environmental cost is related to facilities we currently use, such as pollution control equipment, then we may capitalize and depreciate the costs over the remaining life of the asset, assuming the costs are recoverable in future rates or future cash flows.
Our remediation cost estimates are based on the use of an environmental consultant, our experience, our assessment of the current situation and the technology currently available for use in the remediation. We regularly adjust the recorded costs as we revise estimates and as remediation proceeds. If we are one of several designated responsible parties, then we estimate and record only our share of the cost.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | | (in thousands) | | |
Cash paid for: | | | | | |
Income taxes | $ | 4,707 | | | $ | 4,330 | | | $ | 115 | |
Interest | 95,400 | | | 87,221 | | | 84,922 | |
Significant non-cash transactions: | | | | | |
Capital expenditures included in trade accounts payable | 64,758 | | | 29,034 | | | 21,430 | |
NMTC debt extinguishment included in other noncurrent assets(1) | — | | | 18,169 | | | — | |
NMTC debt extinguishment included in property, plant and equipment, net(1) | — | | | 6,594 | | | — | |
NMTC debt extinguishment included in long-term debt(1) | — | | | 1,259 | | | — | |
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 8,489 | | $ | 2,820 | | $ | 5,811 | |
Restricted cash | 13,974 | | 15,942 | | 11,285 | |
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | $ | 22,463 | | $ | 18,762 | | $ | 17,096 | |
Restricted cash consists primarily of funds held in trust accounts to satisfy the requirements of certain stipulation agreements and insurance reserve requirements.
Accounting Standards Issued
There were no accounting standards adopted in the current year that had a material impact to our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. At this time, we are not expecting the adoption of recently issued accounting standards to have a material impact to our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Montana Rate Review
On August 8, 2022, we filed a Montana electric and natural gas rate review with the MPSC requesting an annual increase to electric and natural gas utility rates of $171.0 million and $23.0 million, respectively, detailed as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Requested Revenue Increase (in millions) |
| Electric | Natural Gas |
Base Rates | $91.8 | $20.2 |
Power Cost & Credit Mechanism (PCCAM)(1) | $68.1 | n/a |
Property Tax (tracker true-up)(1) | $11.1 | $2.8 |
Total | $171.0 | $23.0 |
(1) These items are flow-through costs, which represent approximately 42% of the requested electric and natural gas revenue increase.
Our electric request is based on a return on equity of 10.60% with a forecasted 2022 rate base of $2.8 billion and a capital structure of 51.98% debt and 48.02% equity. Our natural gas request is based on a return on equity of 10.60% with a forecasted 2022 rate base of $575.3 million and a capital structure of 51.98% debt and 48.02% equity.
Within this rate review filing we requested an increase to the Power Cost and Credit Mechanism (PCCAM) base rate (PCCAM Base rate) of $68.1 million, as well as structural revisions to the PCCAM mechanism to provide customers with prices that better reflect the cost of services received. We also proposed to implement a revised electric only pilot for the Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism (FCRM) beginning July 1, 2023, or alternatively to terminate the FCRM. Our rate review filing also includes proposals for more timely cost recovery beyond the test period, including critical reliability resources, such as the Yellowstone County Generating Station, our Enhanced Wildfire Mitigation plan, and business technology maintenance costs.
On September 28, 2022, the MPSC approved the recommendations of the MPSC Staff for interim rates, subject to refund, which increased base electric rates $29.4 million, PCCAM Base rates $61.1 million, and base natural gas rates $1.7 million, effective October 1, 2022.
A hearing is scheduled to commence on April 11, 2023. Interim rates will remain in effect on a refundable basis until the MPSC issues a final order.
Montana Community Renewable Energy Projects (CREPs)
We were required to acquire, as of December 31, 2020, approximately 65 MW of CREPs. While we made progress towards meeting this obligation by acquiring approximately 50 MW of CREPs, we were unable to acquire the remaining MWs required for various reasons, including the fact that proposed projects fail to qualify as CREPs or do not meet the statutory cost cap. The MPSC granted us waivers for 2012 through 2016. The validity of the MPSC’s action as it related to waivers granted for 2015 and 2016 has been challenged legally and was fully briefed before the Montana Supreme Court.
On May 14, 2021, the Montana Governor signed a bill that eliminated the state's Renewable Portfolio Standard, including repeal of the CREP requirement. We notified the Montana Supreme Court of the repeal. We also dismissed our pending application filed with the MPSC for a waiver from full compliance for years 2017 through 2020.
On September 7, 2021, the Montana Supreme Court remanded the case challenging the 2015 and 2016 waivers to the District Court to determine whether the repeal of the CREP requirement made the petition moot. On May 9, 2022, the District Court imposed a $2.5 million penalty against us, payable to the Universal Low Income Assistance Fund in Montana, in connection with a petition filed by the MEIC challenging the MPSC's decision granting our waiver requests from CREP compliance in 2015 and 2016. The expense associated with this penalty was accrued for within our 2022 results. We filed an appeal with the Montana Supreme Court and that appeal is now fully briefed.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(4) Regulatory Assets and Liabilities |
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with the provisions of ASC 980, as discussed in Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies. Pursuant to this guidance, certain expenses and credits, normally reflected in income as incurred, are deferred and recognized when included in rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are recorded based on management's assessment that it is probable that a cost will be recovered or that an obligation has been incurred. Accordingly, we have recorded the following major classifications of regulatory assets and liabilities that will be recognized in expenses and revenues in future periods when the matching revenues are collected or refunded. Of these regulatory assets and liabilities, energy supply costs, excluding the Montana PCCAM, are the only items earning a rate of return. The remaining regulatory items have corresponding assets and liabilities that will be paid for or refunded in future periods.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Note Reference | | Remaining Amortization Period | | December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | (in thousands) |
Flow-through income taxes | 12 | | Plant Lives | | $ | 509,038 | | | $ | 464,663 | |
Supply costs | | | 18 months | | 101,096 | | | 88,329 | |
Pension | 14 | | See Note 14 | | 87,965 | | | 98,336 | |
Excess deferred income taxes | 12 | | Plant Lives | | 54,364 | | | 60,813 | |
Employee related benefits | 14 | | See Note 14 | | 27,920 | | | 21,648 | |
Deferred financing costs | | | See Note 11 | | 22,620 | | | 25,636 | |
State & local taxes & fees | | | 1 Year | | 15,684 | | | 6,520 | |
Environmental clean-up | 18 | | Undetermined | | 10,963 | | | 11,262 | |
Other | | | Various | | 22,929 | | | 29,020 | |
Total Regulatory Assets | | | | | $ | 852,579 | | | $ | 806,227 | |
Removal cost | 6 | | Plant Lives | | $ | 502,289 | | | $ | 479,294 | |
Excess deferred income taxes | 12 | | Plant Lives | | 148,989 | | | 158,047 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supply costs | | | 1 Year | | 11,536 | | | 16,430 | |
Gas storage sales | | | 17 years | | 7,046 | | | 7,466 | |
State & local taxes & fees | | | 1 Year | | 2,327 | | | 3,021 | |
Environmental clean-up | | | 1 Year | | 592 | | | 508 | |
Rates subject to refund | | | Not applicable | | — | | | 1,971 | |
Other | | | Various | | 2,579 | | | 202 | |
Total Regulatory Liabilities | | | | | $ | 675,358 | | | $ | 666,939 | |
Income Taxes
Flow-through income taxes primarily reflect the effects of plant related temporary differences such as flow-through of depreciation, repairs related deductions, and removal costs that we will recover or refund in future rates. We amortize these amounts as temporary differences reverse. Excess deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will be recovered or refunded in future rates. See Note 12 - Income Taxes for further discussion.
Supply Costs
The MPSC, SDPUC and NPSC have authorized the use of electric and natural gas supply cost trackers that enable us to track actual supply costs and either recover the under collection or refund the over collection to our customers. Accordingly, we have recorded a regulatory asset and liability to reflect the future recovery of under collections and refunding of over collections through the ratemaking process. We earn interest on natural gas supply costs under collected, or apply interest to an over collection, of 7.0 percent in Montana; 7.2 percent and 7.8 percent for electric and natural gas, respectively, in South Dakota; and 8.5 percent for natural gas in Nebraska. We do not earn interest on our electric supply tracker, the PCCAM, in Montana.
Pension and Employee Related Benefits
We recognize the unfunded portion of plan benefit obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which is remeasured at each year end, with a corresponding adjustment to regulatory assets/liabilities as the costs associated with these plans are recovered in rates. The MPSC allows recovery of pension costs on a cash funding basis. The portion of the regulatory asset related to our Montana pension plan will amortize as cash funding amounts exceed accrual expense under GAAP. The SDPUC allows recovery of pension and postretirement benefit costs on an accrual basis. The MPSC allows recovery of postretirement benefit costs on an accrual basis.
Deferred Financing Costs
Consistent with our historical regulatory treatment, a regulatory asset has been established to reflect the remaining deferred financing costs on long-term debt that has been replaced through the issuance of new debt. These amounts are amortized over the life of the new debt.
State & Local Taxes & Fees (Montana Property Tax Tracker)
Under Montana law, we are allowed to track the changes in the actual level of state and local taxes and fees and recover the increase in rates, less the amount allocated to FERC jurisdictional customers and net of the related income tax benefit.
Environmental Clean-up
Environmental clean-up costs are the estimated costs of investigating and cleaning up contaminated sites we own. We discuss the specific sites and clean-up requirements further in Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies. Environmental clean-up costs are typically recoverable in customer rates when they are actually incurred. When cost projections become known and measurable, we coordinate with the appropriate regulatory authority to determine a recovery period.
Removal Cost
The anticipated costs of removing assets upon retirement are collected from customers in advance of removal activity as a component of depreciation expense. Our depreciation method, including cost of removal, is established by the respective regulatory commissions. Therefore, consistent with this regulated treatment, we reflect this accrual of removal costs for our regulated assets by increasing our regulatory liability. See Note 6 - Asset Retirement Obligations, for further information regarding this item.
Gas Storage Sales
A regulatory liability was established in 2000 and 2001 based on gains on cushion gas sales in Montana. This gain is being flowed to customers over a period that matches the depreciable life of surface facilities that were added to maintain deliverability from the field after the withdrawal of the gas. This regulatory liability is a reduction of rate base.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5) Property, Plant and Equipment |
The following table presents the major classifications of our property, plant and equipment (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021(1) |
| | (in thousands) |
Electric Plant | | $ | 5,205,788 | | | $ | 4,848,349 | |
Natural Gas Plant | | 1,371,045 | | | 1,252,229 | |
Plant acquisition adjustment(2) | | 686,328 | | | 686,328 | |
Common and Other Plant | | 268,970 | | | 235,746 | |
Construction work in process | | 311,652 | | | 294,617 | |
Total property, plant and equipment | | 7,843,783 | | | 7,317,269 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | (1,880,265) | | | (1,787,550) | |
Less accumulated amortization | | (306,038) | | | (282,487) | |
Net property, plant and equipment | | $ | 5,657,480 | | | $ | 5,247,232 | |
(1) The December 31, 2021 balances reported above have been reclassified to conform with the December 31, 2022 presentation of major classifications of property, plant and equipment. The reclassification has no impact on the presentation of total property, plant and equipment. These reclassifications were done in an effort to better convey the nature of these balances.
(2) The plant acquisition adjustment balance above includes our Beethoven wind project acquired in 2015, our hydro generating assets acquired in 2014, and the inclusion of our interest in Colstrip Unit 4 in rate base in 2009. The acquisition adjustment is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated remaining useful life of each related asset in depreciation expense.
Net plant and equipment under finance lease were $7.2 million and $9.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which included $7.0 million and $9.0 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to a long-term power supply contract with the owners of a natural gas fired peaking plant, which has been accounted for as a finance lease.
Jointly Owned Electric Generating Plant
We have an ownership interest in four base-load electric generating plants, all of which are coal fired and operated by other companies. We have an undivided interest in these facilities and are responsible for our proportionate share of the capital and operating costs while being entitled to our proportionate share of the power generated. Our interest in each plant is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a pro rata basis and our share of operating expenses is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The participants each finance their own investment.
On January 16, 2023, we entered into a definitive agreement (Agreement) with Avista Corporation (Avista) to acquire Avista's 15 percent interest in each of Units 3 and 4 at the Colstrip Generating Station, a coal-fired, base-load electric generation facility located in Colstrip, Montana. As noted in the table below, we currently have a 30 percent interest in Unit 4. The Agreement provides that the purchase price will be $0 and that we will acquire Avista's interest effective December 31, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of the closing conditions contained within the agreement. Under the terms of this Agreement, we will be responsible for operating costs starting on January 1, 2026; while Avista will retain responsibility for its pre-closing share of environmental and pension liabilities attributed to events or conditions existing prior to the closing of the transaction and for any future decommission and demolition costs associated with the existing facilities that comprise Avista's interest.
The Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, covenants, and indemnification obligations, and the Agreement is subject to customary conditions and approvals, including approval from the FERC. Closing also is conditioned on our ability to enter into a new coal supply agreement for Colstrip by December 31, 2024. Such coal supply agreement must provide a sufficient amount of coal to Colstrip to permit the generation of electric power by the maximum permitted capacity of the interest in Colstrip then held by us during the period from January 1, 2026 through, December 31, 2030.
Either party may terminate the Agreement if any requested regulatory approval is denied or if the closing has not occurred by December 31, 2025 or if any law or order would delay or impair closing. The Agreement may be subject to the exercise by other Colstrip owners of a right of first refusal set forth in the O&O Agreement. Should any other owners exercise such rights,
we intend to exercise our right of first refusal under the O&O Agreement to the fullest extent permitted, and Avista has agreed that it will not exercise its right of first refusal.
Information relating to our ownership interest in these facilities is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Big Stone (SD) | | Neal #4 (IA) | | Coyote (ND) | | Colstrip Unit 4 (MT) |
December 31, 2022 | | | | | | | |
Ownership percentages | 23.4 | % | | 8.7 | % | | 10.0 | % | | 30.0 | % |
Plant in service | $ | 155,567 | | | $ | 63,032 | | | $ | 51,796 | | | $ | 326,584 | |
Accumulated depreciation | 42,884 | | | 35,847 | | | 38,955 | | | 121,830 | |
December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | |
Ownership percentages | 23.4 | % | | 8.7 | % | | 10.0 | % | | 30.0 | % |
Plant in service | $ | 154,375 | | | $ | 62,865 | | | $ | 51,652 | | | $ | 324,433 | |
Accumulated depreciation | 42,102 | | | 34,629 | | | 38,453 | | | 113,805 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(6) Asset Retirement Obligations |
We are obligated to dispose of certain long-lived assets upon their abandonment. We recognize a liability for the legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event. We measure the liability at fair value when incurred and capitalize a corresponding amount as part of the book value of the related assets, which increases our property, plant and equipment and other noncurrent liabilities. The increase in the capitalized cost is included in determining depreciation expense over the estimated useful life of these assets. Since the fair value of the asset retirement obligation (ARO) is determined using a present value approach, accretion of the liability due to the passage of time is recognized each period and recorded as a regulatory asset until the settlement of the liability. Revisions to estimated AROs can result from changes in retirement cost estimates, revisions to estimated inflation rates, and changes in the estimated timing of abandonment. If the obligation is settled for an amount other than the carrying amount of the liability, we will recognize a regulatory asset or liability for the difference, which will be surcharged/refunded to customers through the rate making process. We record regulatory assets and liabilities for differences in timing of asset retirement costs recovered in rates and AROs recorded since asset retirement costs are recovered through rates charged to customers.
Our AROs relate to the reclamation and removal costs at our jointly-owned coal-fired generation facilities, U.S. Department of Transportation requirements to cut, purge and cap retired natural gas pipeline segments, our obligation to plug and abandon oil and gas wells at the end of their life, and to remove all above-ground wind power facilities and restore the soil surface at the end of their life. The following table presents the change in our ARO (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Liability at January 1, | $ | 40,631 | | | $ | 45,355 | | | $ | 42,449 | |
Accretion expense | 1,853 | | | 2,233 | | | 2,070 | |
Liabilities incurred | — | | | — | | | — | |
Liabilities settled | (4,004) | | | (2,906) | | | (4,061) | |
Revisions to cash flows | 2,414 | | | (4,051) | | | 4,897 | |
Liability at December 31, | $ | 40,894 | | | $ | 40,631 | | | $ | 45,355 | |
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 our ARO liability decreased $4.0 million for partial settlement of the legal obligations at our jointly-owned coal-fired generation facilities and natural gas pipeline segments. Additionally, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, our ARO liability increased $2.4 million related to changes in both the timing and amount of retirement cost estimates.
In addition, we have identified removal liabilities related to our electric and natural gas transmission and distribution assets that have been installed on easements over property not owned by us. The easements are generally perpetual and only require remediation action upon abandonment or cessation of use of the property for the specified purpose. The ARO liability is not estimable for such easements as we intend to utilize these properties indefinitely. In the event we decide to abandon or cease the use of a particular easement, an ARO liability would be recorded at that time. We also identified AROs associated with our hydroelectric generating facilities; however, due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities currently cannot be estimated and no amounts are recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We collect removal costs in rates for certain transmission and distribution assets that do not have associated AROs. Generally, the accrual of future non-ARO removal obligations is not required; however, long-standing ratemaking practices approved by applicable state and federal regulatory commissions have allowed provisions for such costs in historical depreciation rates. The recorded amounts of costs collected from customers through depreciation rates are classified as a regulatory liability in recognition of the fact that we have collected these amounts that will be used in the future to fund asset retirement costs and do not represent legal retirement obligations. See Note 4 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities for removal costs recorded as regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of April 1, 2022 and no impairment was identified. We calculate the fair value of our reporting units by considering various factors, including valuation studies based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis, with published industry valuations and market data as supporting information. Key assumptions in the determination of fair value include the use of an appropriate discount rate and estimated future cash flows. In estimating cash flows, we incorporate expected long-term growth rates in our service territory, regulatory stability, and commodity prices (where appropriate), as well as other factors that affect our revenue, expense and capital expenditure projections.
Goodwill by segment is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Electric | $ | 243,558 | | | $ | 243,558 | |
Natural gas | 114,028 | | | 114,028 | |
Total Goodwill | $ | 357,586 | | | $ | 357,586 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(8) Risk Management and Hedging Activities |
Nature of Our Business and Associated Risks
We are exposed to certain risks related to the ongoing operations of our business, including the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity and natural gas commodities and changes in interest rates. We rely on market purchases to fulfill a portion of our electric and natural gas supply requirements. Several factors influence price levels and volatility. These factors include, but are not limited to, seasonal changes in demand, weather conditions, available generating assets within regions, transportation availability and reliability within and between regions, fuel availability, market liquidity, and the nature and extent of current and potential federal and state regulations.
Objectives and Strategies for Using Derivatives
To manage our exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices we routinely enter into derivative contracts. These types of contracts are included in our electric and natural gas supply portfolios and are used to manage price volatility risk by taking advantage of fluctuations in market prices. While individual contracts may be above or below market value, the overall portfolio approach is intended to provide greater price stability for consumers. We do not maintain a trading portfolio, and our derivative transactions are only used for risk management purposes consistent with regulatory guidelines.
In addition, we may use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate exposures associated with new debt issuances or to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on variable rate debt.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
We evaluate new and existing transactions and agreements to determine whether they are derivatives. The permitted accounting treatments include: normal purchase normal sale (NPNS); cash flow hedge; fair value hedge; and mark-to-market.
Mark-to-market accounting is the default accounting treatment for all derivatives unless they qualify, and we specifically designate them, for one of the other accounting treatments. Derivatives designated for any of the elective accounting treatments must meet specific, restrictive criteria both at the time of designation and on an ongoing basis. The changes in the fair value of recognized derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and the type of hedge transaction.
Normal Purchases and Normal Sales
We have applied the NPNS scope exception to our contracts involving the physical purchase and sale of gas and electricity at fixed prices in future periods. During our normal course of business, we enter into full-requirement energy contracts, power purchase agreements and physical capacity contracts, which qualify for NPNS. All of these contracts are accounted for using the accrual method of accounting; therefore, there were no unrealized amounts recorded in the Consolidated Financial
Statements at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Revenues and expenses from these contracts are reported on a gross basis in the appropriate revenue and expense categories as the commodities are received or delivered.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the potential loss resulting from counterparty non-performance under an agreement. We manage credit risk with policies and procedures for, among other things, counterparty analysis and exposure measurement, monitoring and mitigation. We limit credit risk in our commodity and interest rate derivatives activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis.
We are exposed to credit risk through buying and selling electricity and natural gas to serve customers. We may request collateral or other security from our counterparties based on the assessment of creditworthiness and expected credit exposure. It is possible that volatility in commodity prices could cause us to have material credit risk exposures with one or more counterparties. We enter into commodity master enabling agreements with our counterparties to mitigate credit exposure, as these agreements reduce the risk of default by allowing us or our counterparty the ability to make net payments. The agreements generally are: (1) Western Systems Power Pool agreements – standardized power purchase and sales contracts in the electric industry; (2) International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreements – standardized financial gas and electric contracts; (3) North American Energy Standards Board agreements – standardized physical gas contracts; and (4) Edison Electric Institute Master Purchase and Sale Agreements – standardized power sales contracts in the electric industry.
Many of our forward purchase contracts contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If our credit rating were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties could require immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on contracts in net liability positions.
Interest Rate Swaps Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
We have previously used interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges to manage our interest rate exposures associated with new debt issuances. We have no interest rate swaps outstanding. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges with the effective portion of gains and losses, net of associated deferred income tax effects, recorded in AOCL. We reclassify these gains from AOCL into interest expense during the periods in which the hedged interest payments occur. The following table shows the effect of these interest rate swaps previously terminated on the Consolidated Financial Statements (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flow Hedges | | Location of Amount Reclassified from AOCL to Income | | Amount Reclassified from AOCL into Income during the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Interest rate contracts | | Interest Expense | | $ | 612 | |
A pre-tax loss of approximately $13.4 million is remaining in AOCL as of December 31, 2022, and we expect to reclassify approximately $0.6 million of pre-tax losses from AOCL into interest expense during the next twelve months. These amounts relate to terminated swaps.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(9) Fair Value Measurements |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price). Measuring fair value requires the use of market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Valuation techniques are required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
Applicable accounting guidance establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value, and requires fair value measurements to be categorized based on the observability of those inputs. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
•Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;
•Level 2 – Pricing inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date; and
•Level 3 – Significant inputs that are generally not observable from market activity.
We classify assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement of each individual asset and liability taken as a whole. Due to the short-term nature of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable, and short-term borrowings, the carrying amount of each such item approximates fair value. The table below sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the gross components of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. NPNS transactions are not included in the fair values by source table as they are not recorded at fair value. See Note 8 - Risk Management and Hedging Activities for further discussion.
We record transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy, if necessary, at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers between levels for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2022 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Margin Cash Collateral Offset | | Total Net Fair Value |
| | (in thousands) |
Restricted cash equivalents | | $ | 12,990 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 12,990 | |
Rabbi trust investments | | 20,895 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 20,895 | |
Total | | $ | 33,885 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,885 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash equivalents | | $ | 14,967 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 14,967 | |
Rabbi trust investments | | 18,234 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 18,234 | |
Total | | $ | 33,201 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,201 | |
Restricted cash equivalents represents amounts held in money market mutual funds. Rabbi trust investments represent assets held for non-qualified deferred compensation plans, which consist of our common stock and actively traded mutual funds with quoted prices in active markets.
Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of financial instruments is summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | $ | 2,618,882 | | | $ | 2,316,700 | | | $ | 2,541,478 | | | $ | 2,827,336 | |
The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies; however, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we would realize in a current market exchange.
We determined fair value for long-term debt based on interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities, except for publicly traded debt, for which fair value is based on market prices for the same or similar issues or upon the quoted market prices of U.S. treasury issues having a similar term to maturity, adjusted for our bond issuance rating and the present value of future cash flows. These are significant other observable inputs, or level 2 inputs, in the fair value hierarchy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(10) Unsecured Credit Facilities |
Credit Facilities
On May 18, 2022, we amended our existing $425 million credit facility to, among other things, change the Eurodollar rate to the secured overnight financing rate as administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (SOFR) and extend the maturity date of the facility from September 2, 2023 to May 18, 2027. The amended and restated credit facility (the Primary Credit Facility) maintains the same capacity at $425 million and uncommitted features that allow us to request up to two one-year extensions to the maturity date and increase the size of the facility by up to an additional $75 million. The Primary Credit Facility does not amortize and is unsecured. Borrowings may be made at interest rates equal to (a) SOFR, plus a credit spread adjustment of 10.0 basis points plus a margin of 100.0 to 175.0 basis points, or (b) a base rate, plus a margin of 0.0 to 75.0 basis points.
On October 28, 2022, we entered into a $100 million Credit Agreement (the Additional Credit Facility) to supplement our existing $425 million revolving credit facility. The Additional Credit Facility has a maturity date of April 28, 2024. The Additional Credit Facility does not amortize and is unsecured. Borrowings may be made at interest rates equal to (a) SOFR, plus a credit spread adjustment of 10.0 basis points, plus a margin of 100.0 to 175.0 basis points, or (b) a base rate, plus a margin of 0.0 to 75.0 basis points.
On March 25, 2022, we amended our existing $25 million swingline credit facility (the Swingline Facility) to, among other things, change the Eurodollar rate to the secured overnight financing rate as administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (SOFR) and extend the maturity date of the facility from March 27, 2023 to March 27, 2024. The Swingline Facility does not amortize and is unsecured. Borrowings may be made at interest rates equal to (a) SOFR, plus a margin of 90.0 basis points, or (b) a base rate, plus a margin of 12.5 basis points.
Commitment fees for the unsecured revolving lines of credit were $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
The availability under the facilities in place for the years ended December 31 is shown in the following table (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| |
| | | |
Unsecured revolving line of credit, expiring May 2027 | $ | 425.0 | | | $ | 425.0 | |
Unsecured revolving line of credit, expiring April 2024 | 100.0 | | | — | |
Unsecured revolving line of credit, expiring March 2024 | 25.0 | | | 25.0 | |
| 550.0 | | | 450.0 | |
| | | |
Amounts outstanding at December 31: | | | |
SOFR borrowings | 450.0 | | | — | |
Eurodollar borrowings | — | | | 373.0 | |
Letters of credit | — | | | — | |
| | | |
| 450.0 | | | 373.0 | |
| | | |
Net availability as of December 31 | $ | 100.0 | | | $ | 77.0 | |
| | | |
The Credit Facility includes covenants that require us to meet certain financial tests, including a maximum debt to capitalization ratio not to exceed 65 percent. The facility also contains covenants which, among other things, limit our ability to engage in any consolidation or merger or otherwise liquidate or dissolve, dispose of property, and enter into transactions with affiliates. A default on the South Dakota or Montana First Mortgage Bonds would trigger a cross default on the Credit Facility; however a default on the Credit Facility would not trigger a default on the South Dakota or Montana First Mortgage Bonds.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(11) Long-Term Debt and Finance Leases |
Long-term debt and finance leases consisted of the following (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| Due | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Unsecured Debt: | | | | | |
Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit | 2027 | | $ | 425,000 | | | $ | — | |
Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit | 2024 | | 25,000 | | | — | |
Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit | 2023 | | — | | | 373,000 | |
Secured Debt: | | | | | |
Mortgage bonds— | | | | | |
South Dakota—5.01% | 2025 | | 64,000 | | | 64,000 | |
South Dakota—4.15% | 2042 | | 30,000 | | | 30,000 | |
South Dakota—4.30% | 2052 | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | |
South Dakota—4.85% | 2043 | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
South Dakota—4.22% | 2044 | | 30,000 | | | 30,000 | |
South Dakota—4.26% | 2040 | | 70,000 | | | 70,000 | |
South Dakota—3.21% | 2030 | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | |
South Dakota—2.80% | 2026 | | 60,000 | | | 60,000 | |
South Dakota—2.66% | 2026 | | 45,000 | | | 45,000 | |
Montana—5.71% | 2039 | | 55,000 | | | 55,000 | |
Montana—5.01% | 2025 | | 161,000 | | | 161,000 | |
Montana—4.15% | 2042 | | 60,000 | | | 60,000 | |
Montana—4.30% | 2052 | | 40,000 | | | 40,000 | |
Montana—4.85% | 2043 | | 15,000 | | | 15,000 | |
Montana—3.99% | 2028 | | 35,000 | | | 35,000 | |
Montana—4.176% | 2044 | | 450,000 | | | 450,000 | |
Montana—3.11% | 2025 | | 75,000 | | | 75,000 | |
Montana—4.11% | 2045 | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | |
Montana—4.03% | 2047 | | 250,000 | | | 250,000 | |
Montana—3.98% | 2049 | | 150,000 | | | 150,000 | |
Montana—3.21% | 2030 | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | |
Montana—1.00% | 2024 | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | |
Pollution control obligations— | | | | | |
Montana—2.00% | 2023 | | 144,660 | | | 144,660 | |
Other Long Term Debt: | | | | | |
Discount on Notes and Bonds and Debt Issuance Costs, Net | — | | | (10,778) | | | (11,182) | |
Total Long-Term Debt | | | $ | 2,618,882 | | | $ | 2,541,478 | |
Less current maturities (including associated debt issuance costs) | | | (144,525) | | | — | |
Total Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities | | | $ | 2,474,357 | | | $ | 2,541,478 | |
| | | | | |
Finance Leases: | | | | | |
Total Finance Leases | Various | | $ | 11,897 | | | $ | 14,772 | |
Less current maturities | | | (3,098) | | | (2,875) | |
Total Long-Term Finance Leases | | | $ | 8,799 | | | $ | 11,897 | |
Secured Debt
First Mortgage Bonds and Pollution Control Obligations
The South Dakota First Mortgage Bonds are a series of general obligation bonds issued under our South Dakota indenture. These bonds are secured by substantially all of our South Dakota and Nebraska electric and natural gas assets.
The Montana First Mortgage Bonds and Montana Pollution Control Obligations are secured by substantially all of our Montana electric and natural gas assets.
In March 2021, we issued and sold $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Montana First Mortgage Bonds (the bonds) at a fixed interest rate of 1.00 percent maturing on March 26, 2024. The net proceeds were used to repay in full our outstanding $100.0 million term loan that was due April 2, 2021. We may redeem some or all of the bonds at any time in whole, or from time to time in part, at our option, on or after March 26, 2022, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the bonds to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the bonds being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. The bonds are secured by our electric and natural gas assets in Montana and Wyoming.
As of December 31, 2022, we were in compliance with our financial debt covenants.
Other Long-Term Debt
In July 2021, our two loans totaling $27.0 million associated with the New Market Tax Credit (NMTC) financing agreement were extinguished. These loans were satisfied with our $18.2 million investment in the entities created in relation to the NMTC transaction, investor forgiveness of $7.9 million for substantially all of the benefits derived from the tax credits, and cash payment of $0.9 million. In accordance with our last rate case filing in the state of Montana, the portion of the loan forgiven, less unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.3 million, was recorded as a reduction to the cost of the office building associated with the NMTC financing agreement. This cash payment is reflected within the financing activities section of our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2021; however, the remaining reduction to Long-term debt, Other noncurrent assets, and Property, plant and equipment are non-cash financing activities that are not reflected within our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Maturities of Long-Term Debt
The aggregate minimum principal maturities of long-term debt and finance leases, during the next five years are $147.8 million in 2023, $128.3 million in 2024, $303.6 million in 2025, $106.9 million in 2026 and $425.0 million in 2027.
Income tax (benefit) expense is comprised of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Federal | | | | | |
Current | $ | 5,024 | | | $ | 722 | | | $ | (3,396) | |
Deferred | (5,993) | | | 2,626 | | | (4,006) | |
Investment tax credits | (130) | | | (130) | | | (3) | |
State | | | | | |
Current | 3,363 | | | 2,172 | | | 3 | |
Deferred | (2,869) | | | (1,971) | | | (3,568) | |
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | $ | (605) | | | $ | 3,419 | | | $ | (10,970) | |
Our effective tax rate typically differs from the federal statutory tax rate primarily due to production tax credits and the regulatory impact of flowing through the federal and state tax benefit of repairs deductions and state tax benefit of accelerated tax depreciation deductions (including bonus depreciation when applicable). The regulatory accounting treatment of these deductions requires immediate income recognition for temporary tax differences of this type, which is referred to as the flow-through method. When the flow-through method of accounting for temporary differences is reflected in regulated revenues, we record deferred income taxes and establish related regulatory assets and liabilities.
The following table reconciles our effective income tax rate to the federal statutory rate:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Federal statutory rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
State income tax, net of federal provisions | 0.3 | | | 0.1 | | | (1.1) | |
Flow-through repairs deductions | (12.4) | | | (11.5) | | | (16.5) | |
Production tax credits | (7.2) | | | (6.1) | | | (9.1) | |
Amortization of excess deferred income taxes | (0.9) | | | (0.3) | | | (0.7) | |
Prior year permanent return to accrual adjustments | (0.8) | | | — | | | (1.2) | |
Plant and depreciation of flow through items | (0.1) | | | (0.6) | | | 0.1 | |
Other, net | (0.2) | | | (0.8) | | | (0.1) | |
Effective tax rate | (0.3) | % | | 1.8 | % | | (7.6) | % |
The table below summarizes the significant differences in income tax expense (benefit) based on the differences between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate (in thousands).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Income Before Income Taxes | $ | 182,403 | | | $ | 190,259 | | | $ | 144,245 | |
| | | | | |
Income tax calculated at federal statutory rate | 38,304 | | | 39,954 | | | 30,292 | |
| | | | | |
Permanent or flow through adjustments: | | | | | |
State income, net of federal provisions | 562 | | | 354 | | | (1,477) | |
Flow-through repairs deductions | (22,665) | | | (21,888) | | | (23,828) | |
Production tax credits | (13,166) | | | (11,532) | | | (13,103) | |
Amortization of excess deferred income taxes | (1,657) | | | (635) | | | (968) | |
Prior year permanent return to accrual adjustments | (1,397) | | | (12) | | | (1,728) | |
Plant and depreciation of flow through items | (222) | | | (941) | | | 121 | |
Other, net | (364) | | | (1,881) | | | (279) | |
| (38,909) | | | (36,535) | | | (41,262) | |
| | | | | |
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense | $ | (605) | | | $ | 3,419 | | | $ | (10,970) | |
The components of the net deferred income tax liability recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to the following temporary differences (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Production tax credit | $ | 80,097 | | | $ | 75,092 | |
Customer advances | 25,119 | | | 21,271 | |
Pension / postretirement benefits | 19,291 | | | 21,435 | |
Compensation accruals | 10,306 | | | 10,612 | |
Unbilled revenue | 9,440 | | | 10,704 | |
Environmental liability | 6,009 | | | 5,704 | |
Reserves and accruals | 4,016 | | | 5,106 | |
Interest rate hedges | 3,372 | | | 3,158 | |
Other, net | 2,595 | | | 1,738 | |
Deferred Tax Asset | 160,245 | | | 154,820 | |
Excess tax depreciation | (449,724) | | | (425,202) | |
Flow through depreciation | (106,623) | | | (94,616) | |
Goodwill amortization | (86,874) | | | (85,425) | |
Regulatory assets and other | (56,007) | | | (49,211) | |
| | | |
Deferred Tax Liability | (699,228) | | | (654,454) | |
Deferred Tax Liability, net | $ | (538,983) | | | $ | (499,634) | |
At December 31, 2022, our total production tax credit carryforward was approximately $80.1 million. If unused, our production tax credit carryforwards will expire as follows: $8.9 million in 2036, $11.0 million in 2037, $10.9 million in 2038, $11.5 million in 2039, $13.1 million in 2040, $11.5 million in 2041, and $13.2 million in 2042. We believe it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will be generated to utilize these production tax credit carryforwards.
Uncertain Tax Positions
We recognize tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The change in unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Unrecognized Tax Benefits at January 1 | $ | 32,049 | | | $ | 33,491 | | | $ | 35,085 | |
Gross increases - tax positions in prior period | — | | | 293 | | | 120 | |
| | | | | |
Gross increases - tax positions in current period | — | | | — | | | — | |
Gross decreases - tax positions in current period | (1,719) | | | (1,735) | | | (1,714) | |
Lapse of statute of limitations | — | | | — | | | — | |
Unrecognized Tax Benefits at December 31 | $ | 30,330 | | | $ | 32,049 | | | $ | 33,491 | |
Our unrecognized tax benefits include approximately $27.9 million and $28.1 million related to tax positions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, that if recognized, would impact our annual effective tax rate. We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of audits or the expiration of statutes of limitation within the next twelve months.
Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2022, we have accrued $1.4 million for the payment of interest and penalties in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021, we had $0.5 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties.
Tax years 2019 and forward remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state taxing authorities. During the first quarter of 2023 the IRS commenced a limited scope examination of the Company's 2019 amended federal income tax return.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(13) Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The following tables display the components of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), after-tax, and the related tax effects (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Before-Tax Amount | | Tax Expense (Benefit) | | Net-of-Tax Amount | | Before-Tax Amount | | Tax Expense | | Net-of-Tax Amount | | Before-Tax Amount | | Tax Expense | | Net-of-Tax Amount |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | $ | (8) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (8) | | | $ | (57) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (57) | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | |
Reclassification of net income (loss) on derivative instruments | 612 | | | (160) | | | 452 | | | 614 | | | (162) | | | 452 | | | 614 | | | (162) | | | 452 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postretirement medical liability adjustment | (1,359) | | | 377 | | | (982) | | | (585) | | | 149 | | | (436) | | | 2,463 | | | (623) | | | 1,840 | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (755) | | | $ | 217 | | | $ | (538) | | | $ | (28) | | | $ | (13) | | | $ | (41) | | | $ | 3,164 | | | $ | (785) | | | $ | 2,379 | |
Balances by classification included within AOCL on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows, net of tax (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | | |
Foreign currency translation | $ | 1,435 | | | $ | 1,443 | | | | |
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges | (9,825) | | | (10,277) | | | | |
Postretirement medical plans | 542 | | | 1,524 | | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (7,848) | | | $ | (7,310) | | | | |
The following table displays the changes in AOCL by component, net of tax (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2022 |
| | | Year Ended |
| Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income | | Interest Rate Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | | Postretirement Medical Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
Beginning balance | | | $ | (10,277) | | | $ | 1,524 | | | $ | 1,443 | | | $ | (7,310) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | (8) | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL | Interest Expense | | 452 | | | — | | | — | | | 452 | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL | | | — | | | (982) | | | — | | | (982) | |
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 452 | | | (982) | | | (8) | | | (538) | |
Ending Balance | | | $ | (9,825) | | | $ | 542 | | | $ | 1,435 | | | $ | (7,848) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2021 |
| | | Year Ended |
| Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income | | Interest Rate Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | | Postretirement Medical Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
Beginning balance | | | $ | (10,729) | | | $ | 1,960 | | | $ | 1,500 | | | $ | (7,269) | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | | | — | | | — | | | (57) | | | (57) | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL | Interest Expense | | 452 | | | — | | | — | | | 452 | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL | | | — | | | (436) | | | — | | | (436) | |
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 452 | | | (436) | | | (57) | | | (41) | |
Ending Balance | | | $ | (10,277) | | | $ | 1,524 | | | $ | 1,443 | | | $ | (7,310) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(14) Employee Benefit Plans |
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We sponsor and/or contribute to pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans for eligible employees. The pension plan for our South Dakota and Nebraska employees is referred to as the NorthWestern Corporation plan, and the pension plan for our Montana employees is referred to as the NorthWestern Energy plan, and collectively they are referred to as the Plans. We utilize a number of accounting mechanisms that reduce the volatility of reported pension costs. Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual plan results are deferred and are recognized into earnings only when the accumulated differences exceed 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. If necessary, the excess is amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees. The Plans' funded status is recognized as an asset or liability in our Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 4 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities, for further discussion on how these costs are recovered through rates charged to our customers.
Benefit Obligation and Funded Status
Following is a reconciliation of the changes in plan benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets, and a statement of the funded status (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | |
Obligation at beginning of period | $ | 696,802 | | | $ | 820,979 | | | $ | 17,308 | | | $ | 19,146 | |
Service cost | 10,223 | | | 12,994 | | | 351 | | | 407 | |
Interest cost | 18,787 | | | 18,759 | | | 358 | | | 317 | |
| | | | | | | |
Actuarial loss | (176,389) | | | (28,905) | | | (99) | | | 415 | |
Settlements(1) | — | | | (93,488) | | | — | | | — | |
Benefits paid | (27,625) | | | (33,537) | | | (2,511) | | | (2,977) | |
Benefit Obligation at End of Period | $ | 521,798 | | | $ | 696,802 | | | $ | 15,407 | | | $ | 17,308 | |
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets: | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | $ | 605,499 | | | $ | 688,456 | | | $ | 25,289 | | | $ | 23,096 | |
Return on plan assets | (144,535) | | | 33,868 | | | (4,098) | | | 3,349 | |
Employer contributions | 8,200 | | | 10,200 | | | 1,375 | | | 1,821 | |
Settlements(1) | — | | | (93,488) | | | — | | | — | |
Benefits paid | (27,625) | | | (33,537) | | | (2,511) | | | (2,977) | |
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | $ | 441,539 | | | $ | 605,499 | | | $ | 20,055 | | | $ | 25,289 | |
Funded Status | $ | (80,259) | | | $ | (91,303) | | | $ | 4,648 | | | $ | 7,981 | |
| | | | | | | |
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Noncurrent asset | 7,195 | | | 8,297 | | | 8,831 | | | 11,914 | |
Total Assets | 7,195 | | | 8,297 | | | 8,831 | | | 11,914 | |
Current liability | (11,200) | | | (11,200) | | | (1,585) | | | (1,575) | |
Noncurrent liability | (76,254) | | | (88,400) | | | (2,598) | | | (2,358) | |
Total Liabilities | (87,454) | | | (99,600) | | | (4,183) | | | (3,933) | |
Net amount recognized | $ | (80,259) | | | $ | (91,303) | | | $ | 4,648 | | | $ | 7,981 | |
| | | | | | | |
Amounts Recognized in Regulatory Assets Consist of: | | | | | | | |
Prior service credit | — | | | — | | | (116) | | | 1,870 | |
Net actuarial loss | (54,383) | | | (62,448) | | | (3,123) | | | 1,366 | |
Amounts recognized in AOCL consist of: | | | | | | | |
Prior service cost | — | | | — | | | — | | | (95) | |
Net actuarial gain | — | | | — | | | 1,046 | | | 2,500 | |
Total | $ | (54,383) | | | $ | (62,448) | | | $ | (2,193) | | | $ | 5,641 | |
(1) In December 2021, we entered into a group annuity contract from an insurance company to provide for the payment of pension benefits to 1,062 NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan participants. We purchased the contract with $93.5 million of plan assets. The insurance company took over the payments of these benefits starting January 1, 2022. This transaction settled $93.5 million of our NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan obligation. As a result of this transaction, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a non-cash, non-operating settlement charge of $11.3 million. This charge is recorded within other income, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. As discussed within Note 4 – Regulatory Assets and Liabilities, this charge was deferred as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with a corresponding decrease to operating and maintenance expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The actuarial gain/loss is primarily due to the change in discount rate assumption and actual asset returns compared with expected amounts. The total projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan |
| December 31, |
2022 | | 2021 |
Projected benefit obligation | $ | 474.9 | | | $ | 636.3 | |
Accumulated benefit obligation | 474.9 | | | 636.3 | |
Fair value of plan assets | 388.7 | | | 537.9 | |
As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of the NorthWestern Corporation pension plan assets exceed the total projected and accumulated benefit obligation and are therefore excluded from this table.
Net Periodic Cost (Credit)
The components of the net costs (credits) for our pension and other postretirement plans are as follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | $ | 10,223 | | | $ | 12,994 | | | $ | 11,116 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 370 | |
Interest cost | 18,787 | | | 18,759 | | | 22,840 | | | 359 | | | 327 | | | 492 | |
Expected return on plan assets | (24,173) | | | (27,061) | | | (26,162) | | | (1,047) | | | (919) | | | (983) | |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,891) | | | (1,835) | | | (1,882) | |
Recognized actuarial loss (gain) | 383 | | | 6,536 | | | 5,028 | | | (897) | | | (898) | | | (61) | |
Settlement loss recognized(1) | — | | | 11,291 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 390 | |
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit) | $ | 5,220 | | | $ | 22,519 | | | $ | 12,822 | | | $ | (3,125) | | | $ | (2,918) | | | $ | (1,674) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory deferral of net periodic benefit cost(2) | 2,307 | | | (13,308) | | | (2,100) | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Previously deferred costs recognized(2) | — | | | — | | | 71 | | | 292 | | | 709 | | | 861 | |
Net Periodic Benefit Cost Recognized | $ | 7,527 | | | $ | 9,211 | | | $ | 10,793 | | | $ | (2,833) | | | $ | (2,209) | | | $ | (813) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Settlement loss is related to partial annuitization of NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan effective December 1, 2021.
(2) Net periodic benefit costs for pension and postretirement benefit plans are recognized for financial reporting based on the authorization of each regulatory jurisdiction in which we operate. A portion of these costs are recorded in regulatory assets and recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income as those costs are recovered through customer rates.
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, Service costs were recorded in Operations and maintenance expense while non-service costs were recorded in Other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
For purposes of calculating the expected return on pension plan assets, the market-related value of assets is used, which is based upon fair value. The difference between actual plan asset returns and estimated plan asset returns are amortized equally over a period not to exceed five years.
Actuarial Assumptions
The measurement dates used to determine pension and other postretirement benefit measurements for the plans are December 31, 2022 and 2021. The actuarial assumptions used to compute net periodic pension cost and postretirement benefit
cost are based upon information available as of the beginning of the year, specifically, market interest rates, past experience and management's best estimate of future economic conditions. Changes in these assumptions may impact future benefit costs and obligations. In computing future costs and obligations, we must make assumptions about such things as employee mortality and turnover, expected salary and wage increases, discount rate, expected return on plan assets, and expected future cost increases. Two of these assumptions have the most impact on the level of cost: (1) discount rate and (2) expected rate of return on plan assets. During 2022, the plan's actuary conducted an experience study to review five years of plan experience and update these assumptions.
On an annual basis, we set the discount rate using a yield curve analysis. This analysis includes constructing a hypothetical bond portfolio whose cash flow from coupons and maturities matches the year-by-year, projected benefit cash flow from our plans. The increase in the discount rate during 2022 decreased our projected benefit obligation by approximately $179.2 million.
In determining the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, we review historical returns, the future expectations for returns for each asset class weighted by the target asset allocation of the pension and postretirement portfolios, and long-term inflation assumptions. Based on the target asset allocation for our pension assets and future expectations for asset returns, we increased our long term rate of return on assets assumption for NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan to 6.44 percent and increased our assumption on the NorthWestern Corporation Pension Plan to 4.83 percent for 2023.
The weighted-average assumptions used in calculating the preceding information are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | |
| December 31, | | December 31, | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | |
Discount rate | 5.20 | | % | 2.65-2.75 | % | 2.20-2.30 | % | 5.15-5.20 | % | 2.35-2.40 | % | 1.80 | | % |
Expected rate of return on assets | 2.66-4.26 | | 3.01-4.17 | | 3.45-4.49 | | 4.23 | | | 4.08 | | | 4.71 | | |
Long-term rate of increase in compensation levels (non-union) | 4.00 | | | 2.84 | | | 2.84 | | | 4.00 | | | 2.84 | | | 2.84 | | |
Long-term rate of increase in compensation levels (union) | 4.00 | | | 2.00 | | | 2.00 | | | 4.00 | | | 2.00 | | | 2.00 | | |
Interest crediting rate | 3.30-6.00 | | 3.30-6.00 | | 3.30-6.00 | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | |
The postretirement benefit obligation is calculated assuming that health care costs increase by a 5.00 percent fixed rate. The company contribution toward the premium cost is capped, therefore future health care cost trend rates are expected to have a minimal impact on company costs and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.
Investment Strategy
Our investment goals with respect to managing the pension and other postretirement assets are to meet current and future benefit payment needs while maximizing total investment returns (income and appreciation) after inflation within the constraints of diversification, prudent risk taking, Prudent Man Rule of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and liability-based considerations. Each plan is diversified across asset classes to achieve optimal balance between risk and return and between income and growth through capital appreciation. Our investment philosophy is based on the following:
•Each plan should be substantially invested as long-term cash holdings reduce long-term rates of return;
•Pension Plan portfolio risk is described by volatility in the funded status of the Plans;
•It is prudent to diversify each plan across the major asset classes;
•Equity investments provide greater long-term returns than fixed income investments, although with greater short-term volatility;
•Fixed income investments of the plans should strongly correlate with the interest rate sensitivity of the plan’s aggregate liabilities in order to hedge the risk of change in interest rates negatively impacting the pension plans overall funded status, (such assets will be described as Liability Hedging Fixed Income assets);
•Allocation to foreign equities increases the portfolio diversification and thereby decreases portfolio risk while providing for the potential for enhanced long-term returns;
•Private real estate and broad global opportunistic fixed income asset classes can provide diversification to both equity and liability hedging fixed income investments and that a moderate allocation to each can potentially improve the expected risk-adjusted return for the NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan investments over full market cycles;
•Active management can reduce portfolio risk and potentially add value through security selection strategies;
•A portion of plan assets should be allocated to passive, indexed management funds to provide for greater diversification and lower cost; and
•It is appropriate to retain more than one investment manager, provided that such managers offer asset class or style diversification.
Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and periodic asset/liability studies.
The most important component of an investment strategy is the portfolio asset mix, or the allocation between the various classes of securities available. The mix of assets is based on an optimization study that identifies asset allocation targets in order to achieve the maximum return for an acceptable level of risk, while minimizing the expected contributions and pension and postretirement expense. In the optimization study, assumptions are formulated about characteristics, such as expected asset class investment returns, volatility (risk), and correlation coefficients among the various asset classes, and making adjustments to reflect future conditions expected to prevail over the study period. Based on this, the target asset allocation established, within an allowable range of plus or minus 5 percent, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NorthWestern Energy Pension | | NorthWestern Corporation Pension | | NorthWestern Energy Health and Welfare |
| December 31, | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Fixed income securities | 45.0 | % | | 55.0 | % | | 90.0 | % | | 90.0 | % | | 40.0 | % | | 40.0 | % |
Non-U.S. fixed income securities | — | | | 4.0 | | | 1.0 | | | 1.0 | | | — | | | — | |
Opportunistic fixed income | 5.5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Global equities | 44.0 | | | 41.0 | | | 9.0 | | | 9.0 | | | 60.0 | | | 60.0 | |
Private real estate | 5.5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The actual allocation by plan is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NorthWestern Energy Pension | | NorthWestern Corporation Pension | | NorthWestern Energy Health and Welfare |
| December 31, | | December 31, | | December 31, |
2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
Cash and cash equivalents | — | % | | 0.1 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 0.4 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 0.1 | % |
Fixed income securities | 44.5 | | | 53.8 | | | 88.6 | | | 89.5 | | | 36.7 | | | 33.7 | |
Non-U.S. fixed income securities | — | | | 3.9 | | | 0.9 | | | 0.9 | | | — | | | — | |
Opportunistic fixed income | 5.5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Global equities | 43.4 | | | 42.2 | | | 9.4 | | | 9.2 | | | 62.7 | | | 66.2 | |
Private real estate | 6.6 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Generally, the asset mix will be rebalanced to the target mix as individual portfolios approach their minimum or maximum levels. The guidelines allow for a transition to targets over time as assets are reallocated to newly-approved asset classes of opportunistic fixed income and private real estate. Debt securities consist of U.S. and international instruments including emerging markets and high yield instruments, as well as government, corporate, asset backed and mortgage backed securities. While the portfolio may invest in high yield securities, the average quality must be rated at least “investment grade" by rating agencies. Equity, real estate and fixed income portfolios may be comprised of both active and passive management strategies. Performance of fixed income investments is measured by both traditional investment benchmarks as well as relative changes in the present value of the plan's liabilities. Equity investments consist primarily of U.S. stocks including large, mid and small cap stocks. We also invest in global equities with exposure to developing and emerging markets. Equity investments may also be diversified across investment styles such as growth and value. Derivatives, options and futures are permitted for the purpose of reducing risk but may not be used for speculative purposes. Real estate investments will consist of global equity or debt interests in tangible property consisting of land, buildings, and other improvements in commercial and residential sectors.
Our plan assets are primarily invested in common collective trusts (CCTs), which are invested in equity and fixed income securities. In accordance with our investment policy, these pooled investment funds must have an adequate asset base relative to
their asset class and be invested in a diversified manner and have a minimum of three years of verified investment performance experience or verified portfolio manager investment experience in a particular investment strategy and have management and oversight by an investment advisor registered with the SEC. Investments in a collective investment vehicle are valued by multiplying the investee company’s net asset value per share with the number of units or shares owned at the valuation date. Net asset value per share is determined by the trustee. Investments held by the CCT, including collateral invested for securities on loan, are valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service approved by the CCT’s investment manager, which determines valuations using methods based on quoted closing market prices on national securities exchanges, or at fair value as determined in good faith by the CCT’s investment manager if applicable. The funds do not contain any redemption restrictions. The direct holding of NorthWestern Corporation stock is not permitted; however, any holding in a diversified mutual fund or collective investment fund is permitted.
Cash Flows
In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), and the relief provisions of the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (WRERA), we are required to meet minimum funding levels in order to avoid required contributions and benefit restrictions. We have elected to use asset smoothing provided by the WRERA, which allows the use of asset averaging, including expected returns (subject to certain limitations), for a 24-month period in the determination of funding requirements. Additional funding relief was passed in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, providing for longer amortization and interest rate smoothing, which we elected to use. We expect to continue to make contributions to the pension plans in 2023 and future years that reflect the minimum requirements and discretionary amounts consistent with the amounts recovered in rates. Additional legislative or regulatory measures, as well as fluctuations in financial market conditions, may impact our funding requirements.
Due to the regulatory treatment of pension costs in Montana, pension costs for 2022, 2021 and 2020 were based on actual contributions to the plan. Annual contributions to each of the pension plans are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
NorthWestern Energy Pension Plan (MT) | $ | 7,000 | | | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | 10,201 | |
NorthWestern Corporation Pension Plan (SD and NE) | 1,200 | | | 1,200 | | | 1,200 | |
| $ | 8,200 | | | $ | 10,200 | | | $ | 11,401 | |
We estimate the plans will make future benefit payments to participants as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
2023 | 31,014 | | | 2,520 | |
2024 | 32,448 | | | 2,079 | |
2025 | 33,904 | | | 1,584 | |
2026 | 34,908 | | | 1,511 | |
2027 | 35,490 | | | 1,372 | |
2028-2032 | 185,939 | | | 6,060 | |
Defined Contribution Plan
Our defined contribution plan permits employees to defer receipt of compensation as provided in Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the plan, employees may elect to direct a percentage of their gross compensation to be contributed to the plan. We contribute various percentage amounts of the employee's gross compensation contributed to the plan. Matching contributions for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $12.3 million, $11.8 million, and $11.1 million, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(15) Stock-Based Compensation |
We grant stock-based awards through our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (ECP), which includes restricted stock awards and performance share awards. As of December 31, 2022, there were 655,565 shares of common stock remaining available for grants. The remaining vesting period for awards previously granted ranges from one to five years if the service and/or performance requirements are met. Nonvested shares do not receive dividend distributions. The long-term incentive plan provides for accelerated vesting in the event of a change in control.
We account for our share-based compensation arrangements by recognizing compensation costs for all share-based awards over the respective service period for employee services received in exchange for an award of equity or equity-based compensation. The compensation cost is based on the fair value of the grant on the date it was awarded.
Performance Unit Awards
Performance unit awards are granted annually under the ECP. These awards vest at the end of the three-year performance period if we have achieved certain performance goals and the individual remains employed by us. The exact number of shares issued will vary from 0 percent to 200 percent of the target award, depending on actual company performance relative to the performance goals. These awards contain both market- and performance-based components. The performance goals are independent of each other and equally weighted, and are based on two metrics: (i) EPS growth level and average return on equity; and (ii) total shareholder return (TSR) relative to a peer group.
Fair value is determined for each component of the performance unit awards. The fair value of the earnings per share component is estimated based upon the closing market price of our common stock as of the date of grant less the present value of expected dividends, multiplied by an estimated performance multiple determined on the basis of historical experience, which is subsequently trued up at vesting based on actual performance. The fair value of the TSR portion is estimated using a statistical model that incorporates the probability of meeting performance targets based on historical returns relative to the peer group. The following summarizes the significant assumptions used to determine the fair value of performance shares and related compensation expense as well as the resulting estimated fair value of performance shares granted:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.82 | % | | 0.19 | % |
Expected life, in years | 3 | | 3 |
Expected volatility | 28.2% to 38.8% | | 28.2% to 38.5% |
Dividend yield | 4.5 | % | | 4.3 | % |
The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield of a three-year bond at the time of grant. The expected term of the performance shares is three years based on the performance cycle. Expected volatility was based on the historical volatility for the peer group. Both performance goals are measured over the three-year vesting period and are charged to compensation expense over the vesting period based on the number of shares expected to vest.
A summary of nonvested shares as of and changes during the year ended December 31, 2022, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Performance Unit Awards |
| Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
Beginning nonvested grants | 162,523 | | | $ | 58.76 | |
Granted | 92,970 | | | 51.61 | |
Vested | (58,889) | | | 73.13 | |
Forfeited | (2,197) | | | 54.25 | |
Remaining nonvested grants | 194,407 | | | $ | 51.04 | |
We recognized compensation expense of $4.2 million, $3.9 million, and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, and related income tax benefit of $(1.3) million, $(0.2) million, and $(0.6) million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, we had $6.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested portion of outstanding awards, which is reflected as nonvested stock as a portion of
additional paid in capital in our Statements of Common Shareholders' Equity. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 years. The total fair value of shares vested was $4.3 million, $4.2 million, and $5.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Retirement/Retention Restricted Share Awards
In December 2011, an executive retirement / retention program was established that provides for the annual grant of restricted share units. Awards granted before 2022 are subject to a five-year performance and vesting period. The performance measure for these awards requires net income for the calendar year of at least three of the five full calendar years during the performance period to exceed net income for the calendar year the awards are granted. Awards granted in 2022 and retirement/retention restricted share awards granted in the future no longer contain this performance measure, instead these awards will vest after five full calendar years if the employee remains employed during that service period. Once vested, the awards will be paid out in shares of common stock in five equal annual installments after a recipient has separated from service. The fair value of these awards is measured based upon the closing market price of our common stock as of the date of grant less the present value of expected dividends.
A summary of nonvested shares as of and changes during the year ended December 31, 2022, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
Beginning nonvested grants | 87,319 | | | $ | 49.63 | |
Granted | 25,360 | | | 47.04 | |
Vested | (13,394) | | | 52.20 | |
Forfeited | — | | | — | |
Remaining nonvested grants | 99,285 | | | $ | 48.62 | |
Director's Deferred Compensation
Nonemployee directors may elect to defer up to 100 percent of any qualified compensation that would be otherwise payable to him or her, subject to compliance with our 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors and Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The deferred compensation may be invested in NorthWestern stock or in designated investment funds. Compensation deferred in a particular month is recorded as a deferred stock unit (DSU) on the first of the following month based on the closing price of NorthWestern stock or the designated investment fund. The DSUs are marked-to-market on a quarterly basis with an adjustment to director’s compensation expense. Based on the election of the nonemployee director, following separation from service on the Board, other than on account of death, he or she shall be paid a distribution either in a lump sum or in approximately equal installments over a designated number of years (not to exceed 10 years).
Following is a summary of the components of DSUs issued and compensation expense attributable to the DSUs (in millions, except DSU amounts):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
DSUs Issued | 12,109 | | | 18,741 | | | 21,434 | |
| | | | | |
Compensation expense | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 1.1 | | | $ | 1.5 | |
Change in value of shares | 0.1 | | | 1.3 | | | (2.9) | |
Total compensation expense (benefit) | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 2.4 | | | $ | (1.4) | |
| | | | | |
DSUs withdrawn | 4,022 | | | 186,137 | | | 613 | |
Value of DSUs withdrawn | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 12.1 | | | $ | 0.1 | |
We have 250,000,000 shares authorized consisting of 200,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.01 par value and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $0.01 par value. Of the common stock, 2,865,957 shares are reserved for the incentive plan awards. For further detail of grants under this plan see Note 15 - Stock-Based Compensation.
Repurchase of Common Stock
Shares tendered by employees to us to satisfy the employees' tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards totaled 16,120 and 16,880 during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and are reflected in treasury stock. These shares were credited to treasury stock based on their fair market value on the vesting date.
Issuance of Common Stock
In April 2021, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with BofA Securities, Inc., CIBC World Markets Corp, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, collectively the sales agents, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock from time to time, having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $200.0 million, through an At-the-Market (ATM) offering program, including an equity forward sales component. This is a three-year agreement, expiring on February 11, 2024. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we issued 1,966,117 shares of our common stock under the ATM program at an average price of $63.81, for net proceeds of $124.0 million, which is net of sales commissions and other fees paid of approximately $1.3 million. We did not issue equity through the ATM program during 2022.
On November 17, 2021, we announced a registered public offering of 6,074,767 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $53.50 per share, for an issuance amount of $325.0 million. In conjunction with this offering, we granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 911,215 additional shares, which was subsequently exercised in full, for an additional issuance amount of $48.8 million. Of the total 6,985,982 shares of common stock offered, we initially sold 1,401,869 shares, $75.0 million in gross proceeds, directly to the underwriters in the offering, with cash proceeds received at closing. The remaining 5,584,113 shares were sold under forward sales agreements which provide for settlement on a settlement date or dates to be specified at our discretion, but which is expected to occur on or prior to February 28, 2023. The cumulative shares issued under the forward sales agreement is limited to one and one-half times the base number of shares within the agreement, or 8,376,170 shares.
The forward sales agreements were physically settled with common shares issued by us. On settlement dates, we issued shares of common stock to the forward purchaser at the then-applicable forward sale price and received issuance proceeds at that time. The forward sale price was initially $51.8950 per share, which was subject to adjustment based on a floating interest rate factor equal to the overnight bank funding rate less a spread of 75 basis points, and was subject to decrease on certain dates specified in the forward sale agreement by amounts related to expected dividends on shares of common stock during the term of the forward sale agreement.
On June 24, 2022, we partially settled the forward sale agreement by physically delivering 2,004,483 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of $99.9 million, net of issuance costs. On September 21, 2022, we partially settled the forward sale agreement by physically delivering 1,618,932 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $80.0 million, net of issuance costs. On November 28, 2022, we partially settled the forward sale agreement by physically delivering 1,409,702 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $70.0 million, net of issuance costs. On December 21, 2022, we settled the remaining portion of the forward sale agreement by physically delivering 550,996 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $27.1 million, net of issuance costs. The proceeds were used to pay down borrowings under our revolving credit facility and for other general corporate purposes.
The forward sale agreement was classified as an equity transaction because it was indexed to our common stock, physical settlement was within our control, and the other requirements necessary for equity classification were met. As a result of the equity classification, no gain or loss was recognized within earnings due to subsequent changes in the fair value of the forward sales agreement. If the average price of our common stock exceeds the adjusted forward sales price during a quarterly period, the forward sales agreement could have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of common stock equivalent shares that could occur if unvested shares were to vest. Common stock equivalent shares are calculated using the treasury stock method, as applicable. The dilutive effect is computed by dividing earnings applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of the outstanding unvested restricted stock and performance share awards. Average shares used in computing the basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Basic computation | 55,769,156 | | | 51,709,229 | | | 50,559,208 | |
Dilutive effect of | | | | | |
Performance and restricted share awards(1) | 26,621 | | | 111,940 | | | 145,181 | |
Forward equity sale(2) | 496,333 | | | 51,057 | | | — | |
Diluted computation | 56,292,110 | | | 51,872,226 | | | 50,704,389 | |
(1) Performance share awards are included in diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding based upon what would be issued if the end of the most recent reporting period was the end of the term of the award.
(2) Forward equity shares are included in diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding based upon what would be issued if the end of the most recent reporting period was the end of the term of the forward sale agreement.
As of December 31, 2022, there were 21,459 shares from performance and restricted share awards which were antidilutive and excluded from the earnings per share calculations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(18) Commitments and Contingencies |
Qualifying Facilities Liability
Our QF liability primarily consists of unrecoverable costs associated with three contracts covered under the PURPA. These contracts require us to purchase minimum amounts of energy at prices ranging from $64 to $136 per MWH through 2029. As of December 31, 2022, our estimated gross contractual obligation related to these contracts was approximately $386.1 million through 2029. A portion of the costs incurred to purchase this energy is recoverable through rates, totaling approximately $327.8 million through 2029. As contractual obligations are settled, the related purchases and sales are recorded within Fuel, purchased power and direct transmission expense and Electric revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The present value of the remaining liability is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following summarizes the change in the liability (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
Beginning QF liability | $ | 64,943 | | | $ | 81,379 | |
Settlements(1) | (20,076) | | | (22,497) | |
Interest expense | 4,861 | | | 6,061 | |
Ending QF liability | $ | 49,728 | | | $ | 64,943 | |
(1) The primary components of the change in settlement amounts includes (i) a lower periodic adjustment of $5.4 million due to actual price escalation, which was less than previously modeled; (ii) higher costs of approximately $0.8 million, due to a $1.8 million reduction in costs for the adjustment to actual output and pricing for the current contract year as compared with a $2.6 million reduction in costs in the prior period; and (iii) a prior year favorable adjustment of approximately $7.0 million decreasing the QF liability associated with a one-time clarification in contract term.
The following summarizes the estimated gross contractual obligation less amounts recoverable through rates (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Obligation | | Recoverable Amounts | | Net |
2023 | $ | 80,750 | | | $ | 61,280 | | | $ | 19,470 | |
2024 | 76,393 | | | 60,706 | | | 15,687 | |
2025 | 60,360 | | | 52,950 | | | 7,410 | |
2026 | 55,393 | | | 46,274 | | | 9,119 | |
2027 | 56,665 | | | 46,668 | | | 9,997 | |
Thereafter | 56,534 | | | 59,895 | | | (3,361) | |
Total(1) | $ | 386,095 | | | $ | 327,773 | | | $ | 58,322 | |
(1) This net unrecoverable amount represents the undiscounted difference between the total gross obligations and recoverable amounts. The ending QF liability in the table above represents the present value of this net unrecoverable amount.
Long Term Supply and Capacity Purchase Obligations
We have entered into various commitments, largely purchased power, electric transmission, coal and natural gas supply and natural gas transportation contracts. These commitments range from one to 24 years. Costs incurred under these contracts are included in Fuel, purchased power and direct transmission expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income and were approximately $328.0 million, $286.7 million and $206.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, our commitments under these contracts were $413.4 million in 2023, $247.5 million in 2024, $235.8 million in 2025, $247.0 million in 2026, $230.3 million in 2027, and $1.5 billion thereafter. These commitments are not reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Hydroelectric License Commitments
With the 2014 purchase of hydroelectric generating facilities and associated assets located in Montana, we assumed two Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) existing with state, federal and private entities. The MOUs are periodically updated and renewed and require us to implement plans to mitigate the impact of the projects on fish, wildlife and their habitats, and to increase recreational opportunities. The MOUs were created to maximize collaboration between the parties and enhance the possibility to receive matching funds from relevant federal agencies. Under these MOUs, we have a remaining commitment to spend approximately $24.5 million between 2023 and 2040. These commitments are not reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES AND REGULATION |
Environmental Matters
The operation of electric generating, transmission and distribution facilities, and gas gathering, storage, transportation and distribution facilities, along with the development (involving site selection, environmental assessments, and permitting) and construction of these assets, are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental and land use laws and regulations. Our activities involve compliance with diverse laws and regulations that address emissions and impacts to the environment, including air and water, protection of natural resources, avian and wildlife. We monitor federal, state, and local environmental initiatives to determine potential impacts on our financial results. As new laws or regulations are implemented, our policy is to assess their applicability and implement the necessary modifications to our facilities or their operation to maintain ongoing compliance.
Our environmental exposure includes a number of components, including remediation expenses related to the cleanup of current or former properties, and costs to comply with changing environmental regulations related to our operations. At present, our environmental reserve, which relates primarily to the remediation of former manufactured gas plant sites owned by us or for which we are responsible, is estimated to range between $21.6 million to $32.7 million. As of December 31, 2022, we had a reserve of approximately $26.4 million, which has not been discounted. Environmental costs are recorded when it is probable we are liable for the remediation and we can reasonably estimate the liability. We use a combination of site investigations and monitoring to formulate an estimate of environmental remediation costs for specific sites. Our monitoring procedures and development of actual remediation plans depend not only on site specific information but also on coordination with the different
environmental regulatory agencies in our respective jurisdictions; therefore, while remediation exposure exists, it may be many years before costs are incurred.
The following summarizes the change in our environmental liability (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
Liability at January 1, | $ | 26,866 | | | $ | 28,895 | | | $ | 30,276 | |
Deductions | (2,033) | | | (2,799) | | | (2,977) | |
Charged to costs and expense | 1,534 | | | 770 | | | 1,596 | |
Liability at December 31, | $ | 26,367 | | | $ | 26,866 | | | $ | 28,895 | |
Over time, as costs become determinable, we may seek authorization to recover such costs in rates or seek insurance reimbursement as available and applicable; therefore, although we cannot guarantee regulatory recovery, we do not expect these costs to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Manufactured Gas Plants - Approximately $20.5 million of our environmental reserve accrual is related to the following manufactured gas plants.
South Dakota - A formerly operated manufactured gas plant located in Aberdeen, South Dakota, has been identified on the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System list as contaminated with coal tar residue. We are currently conducting feasibility studies, implementing remedial actions pursuant to work plans approved by the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, and conducting ongoing monitoring and operation and maintenance activities. As of December 31, 2022, the reserve for remediation costs at this site was approximately $7.8 million, and we estimate that approximately $2.8 million of this amount will be incurred through 2025.
Nebraska - We own sites in North Platte, Kearney, and Grand Island, Nebraska on which former manufactured gas facilities were located. We are currently working independently to fully characterize the nature and extent of potential impacts associated with these Nebraska sites. Our reserve estimate includes assumptions for site assessment and remedial action work. At present, we cannot determine with a reasonable degree of certainty the nature and timing of any risk-based remedial action at our Nebraska locations.
Montana - We own or have responsibility for sites in Butte, Missoula, and Helena, Montana on which former manufactured gas plants were located. The Butte and Helena sites, both listed as high priority sites on Montana’s state superfund list, were placed into the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) voluntary remediation program for cleanup due to soil and groundwater impacts. Soil and coal tar were removed at the sites in accordance with the MDEQ requirements. Groundwater monitoring is conducted semiannually at both sites. At this time, we cannot estimate with a reasonable degree of certainty the nature and timing of additional remedial actions and/or investigations, if any, at the Butte site.
In August 2016, the MDEQ sent us a Notice of Potential Liability and Request for Remedial Action regarding the Helena site. In October 2019, we submitted a third revised Remedial Investigation Work Plan (RIWP) for the Helena site addressing MDEQ comments. The MDEQ approved the RIWP in March 2020 and field work was completed in 2022. We submitted a Remedial Investigation Report (RI Report) summarizing the work completed to MDEQ and are awaiting its review and comments as to any additional field work. We expect the MDEQ review of the RI Report to be concluded in 2023, and any additional field work to commence following that.
MDEQ has indicated it expects to proceed in listing the Missoula site as a Montana superfund site. After researching historical ownership, we have identified another potentially responsible party with whom we have entered into an agreement allocating third-party costs to be incurred in addressing the site. The other party has assumed the lead role at the site and has expressed its intention to submit a voluntary remediation plan for the Missoula site to MDEQ. At this time, we cannot estimate with a reasonable degree of certainty the nature and timing of risk-based remedial action, if any, at the Missoula site.
Global Climate Change - National and international actions have been initiated to address global climate change and the contribution of GHG including, most significantly, carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane emissions from natural gas. These actions include legislative proposals, Executive, Congressional and EPA actions at the federal level, state level activity, investor activism and private party litigation relating to GHG emissions. Coal-fired plants have come under particular scrutiny. We have joint ownership interests in four coal-fired electric generating plants, all of which other companies operate. Despite efforts over the years, Congress has not passed any federal climate change legislation regarding GHG emissions from coal-fired plants. While, Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) confers authority on EPA and the states to regulate emissions, including
GHGs, from existing stationary sources, no regulation has survived judicial review. In 2022 EPA opened a docket to collect public input to guide the EPA’s next effort to reduce GHG emissions from new and existing coal fired plants and natural gas operations. EPA indicated that it intends to use this non-rulemaking docket to gather perspectives from a broad group of stakeholders in advance of an expected proposed rulemaking. Ultimately, we cannot predict whether or how future GHG emission legislation, regulations, investor activism or litigation will impact our plants. As GHG regulations are implemented, it could result in additional compliance costs impacting our future results of operations and financial position, if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates. These could cause us to incur material costs of compliance, increase our costs of procuring electricity, decrease transmission revenue and impact cost recovery. Technology to efficiently capture, remove and/or sequester such GHG emissions may not be available within a timeframe consistent with the implementation of any such requirements. Physical impacts of climate change also may present potential risks for severe weather, such as droughts, fires, floods, wind, ice storms and tornadoes, in the locations where we operate or have interests. These potential risks may impact costs for electric and natural gas supply and maintenance of generation, distribution, and transmission facilities. We will continue working with federal and state regulatory authorities, other utilities, and stakeholders to seek relief from any GHG regulations that, in our view, disproportionately impact our customers.
Clean Air Act Rules and Associated Emission Control Equipment Expenditures - The EPA has proposed or issued a number of rules under different provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that could require the installation of emission control equipment at the generation plants in which we have joint ownership. Air emissions at our thermal generating plants are managed by the use of emissions and combustion controls and monitoring, and sulfur dioxide allowances. These measures are anticipated to be sufficient to permit the facilities to continue to meet current air emissions compliance requirements.
Regional Haze Rules - In January 2017, the EPA published amendments to the requirements under the CAA for state plans for protection of visibility - regional haze rules. Among other things, these amendments revised the process and requirements for the state implementation plans and extended the due date for the next periodic comprehensive regional haze state implementation plan revisions from 2018 to 2021.
The states of Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota have developed and submitted to the EPA, for its approval, their respective State Implementation Plans (SIP) for Regional Haze compliance. While these states, among others, did not meet the EPA’s July 31, 2021 submission deadline, they were all submitted in 2022. The Montana SIP as drafted and submitted to EPA does not call for additional controls for our interest in Colstrip Unit 4. The draft North Dakota SIP does not require any additional controls at the Coyote generating facility. Similarly, the draft South Dakota SIP does not require any additional controls at the Big Stone generating facility. Until these SIPs are finalized and approved by EPA, the potential remains that installation of additional emissions controls might be required at these facilities.
Jointly Owned Plants - We have joint ownership in generation plants located in South Dakota, North Dakota, Iowa, and Montana that are or may become subject to the various regulations discussed above that have been or may be issued or proposed.
Other - We continue to manage equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) oil in accordance with the EPA's Toxic Substance Control Act regulations. We will continue to use certain PCB-contaminated equipment for its remaining useful life and will, thereafter, dispose of the equipment according to pertinent regulations that govern the use and disposal of such equipment.
We routinely engage the services of a third-party environmental consulting firm to assist in performing a comprehensive evaluation of our environmental reserve. Based upon information available at this time, we believe that the current environmental reserve properly reflects our remediation exposure for the sites currently and previously owned by us. The portion of our environmental reserve applicable to site remediation may be subject to change as a result of the following uncertainties:
•We may not know all sites for which we are alleged or will be found to be responsible for remediation; and
•Absent performance of certain testing at sites where we have been identified as responsible for remediation, we cannot estimate with a reasonable degree of certainty the total costs of remediation.
Pacific Northwest Solar Litigation
Pacific Northwest Solar, LLC (PNWS) is a solar QF developer seeking to construct small solar facilities in Montana. We began negotiating with PNWS in early 2016 to purchase the output from 21 of its proposed facilities pursuant to our standard QF-1 Tariff, which is applicable to projects no larger than 3 MWs.
On June 16, 2016, however, the MPSC suspended the availability of the QF-1 Tariff standard rates for that category of solar projects, which included the projects proposed by PNWS. The MPSC exempted from the suspension any projects for which a QF had both submitted a signed power purchase agreement and had executed an interconnection agreement with us by June 16, 2016. Although we had signed four power purchase agreements with PNWS as of that date, we had not entered into interconnection agreements with PNWS for any of those projects. As a result, none of the PNWS projects in Montana qualified for the exemption.
In November 2016, PNWS sued us in state court seeking unspecified damages for breach of contract and a judicial declaration that some or all of the 21 proposed power purchase agreements it had proposed to us were in effect despite the MPSC's Order. We removed the state lawsuit to the United States District Court for the District of Montana.
On August 31, 2021, the District Court ruled that the four agreements were valid and enforceable contracts and that we breached the agreements on June 16, 2016 by refusing to go forward with the projects in spite of the MPSC's Orders. On December 15, 2021, after a three-day trial, the jury determined that PNWS had sustained $0.5 million in damages and the judge subsequently entered judgment against us in that amount.
The appeal is fully briefed at the Ninth Circuit. Oral arguments were held on February 8, 2023.
Talen Montana Bankruptcy
On May 9, 2022 Talen Energy Supply, LLC (Talen Energy) along with 71 affiliated entities, filed bankruptcy in Houston, Texas, seeking reorganization under Chapter 11 (the Talen Bankruptcy). Talen Montana, LLC (Talen) was one of the affiliated entities that filed bankruptcy and is included as a part of the Talen Bankruptcy. Talen is one of the co-owners of Colstrip Units 1, 2 and 3, and the operator of Units 3 and 4. The Talen Bankruptcy filing, along with the automatic stay under §362 of the Bankruptcy Code, has affected pending legal proceedings in which both NorthWestern and Talen are involved, including the State of Montana-Riverbed Rents Litigation, the Colstrip Arbitration and Litigation, and the Colstrip Coal Dust Litigation, as described in the individual matters below. On December 15, 2022 the bankruptcy court confirmed Talen’s Chapter 11 Plan. Apart from the delays of legal proceedings due to the automatic stay, we have not noted any detrimental effect on the operation or Colstrip Units 3 and 4 caused by Talen’s bankruptcy.
State of Montana - Riverbed Rents
On April 1, 2016, the State of Montana (State) filed a complaint on remand (the State’s Complaint) with the Montana First Judicial District Court (State District Court), naming us, along with Talen as defendants. The State claimed it owns the riverbeds underlying 10 of our, and formerly Talen’s, hydroelectric facilities (dams, along with reservoirs and tailraces) on the Missouri, Madison and Clark Fork Rivers, and seeks rents for Talen’s and our use and occupancy of such lands. The facilities at issue include the Hebgen, Madison, Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony facilities on the Missouri and Madison Rivers and the Thompson Falls facility on the Clark Fork River. We acquired these facilities from Talen in November 2014.
The litigation has a long prior history. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision holding that the Montana Supreme Court erred in not considering a segment-by-segment approach to determine navigability and relying on present day recreational use of the rivers. It also held that what it referred to as the Great Falls Reach “at least from the head of the first waterfall to the foot of the last” was not navigable for title purposes, and thus the State did not own the riverbeds in that segment. The United States Supreme Court remanded the case to the Montana Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion. Following the 2012 remand, the case laid dormant for four years until the State’s Complaint was filed with the State District Court. On April 20, 2016, we removed the case from State District Court to the United States District Court for the District of Montana (Federal District Court). On August 1, 2018, the Federal District Court granted our and Talen’s motions to dismiss the State’s Complaint as it pertains to the Great Falls Reach. A bench trial before the Federal District Court commenced January 4, 2022 and concluded on January 18, 2022, which addressed the issue of navigability.
Damages were bifurcated by agreement and will be tried separately, should the Federal District Court find any segments navigable.
The Talen Bankruptcy filing in May 2022, and resulting automatic stay, resulted in a hold on this case, including a hold on any decision regarding navigability. In September 2022, the parties stipulated and the Bankruptcy Court issued its Order modifying the stay to permit the Federal District Court to issue its decision on the navigability phase of the case. We are awaiting the Federal District Court decision on navigability. The damages phase of the case remains stayed.
We dispute the State’s claims and intend to continue to vigorously defend the lawsuit. At this time, we cannot predict an outcome. If the Federal District Court determines the riverbeds are navigable under the remaining six facilities that were not dismissed and if it calculates damages as the State District Court did in 2008, we estimate the annual rents could be approximately $3.8 million commencing when we acquired the facilities in November 2014. We anticipate that any obligation to pay the State rent for use and occupancy of the riverbeds would be recoverable in rates from customers, although there can be no assurances that the MPSC would approve any such recovery.
Colstrip Arbitration and Litigation
The six owners of Units 3 and 4 currently share the operating costs pursuant to the terms of an operating agreement among them, the Ownership and Operation Agreement (O&O Agreement). Costs of common facilities were historically shared among the owners of all four units. With the closure of Units 1 and 2, we have incurred additional operating costs with respect to our interest in Unit 4 and may experience a negative impact on our transmission revenue due to reduced amounts of energy transmitted across our transmission lines.
The remaining depreciable life of our investment in Colstrip Unit 4 is through 2042. Recovery of costs associated with the closure of the facility is subject to MPSC approval. Three of the joint owners of Units 3 and 4 are subject to regulation in Washington and in May 2019, the Washington state legislature enacted a statute mandating Washington electric utilities to “eliminate coal-fired resources from [their] allocation of electricity” on or before December 31, 2025, after which date they may no longer include their share of coal-fired resources in their regulated electric supply portfolio.
While we believe closure requires each owner’s consent, there are differences among the owners as to this issue under the O&O Agreement. On March 12, 2021, we initiated an arbitration under the O&O Agreement (the “Arbitration”), which seeks to resolve the primary issue of whether closure of Units 3 and 4 can be accomplished without each joint owner's consent and to clarify the obligations of the joint owners to continue to fund operations until all joint owners agree on closure.
While the pendency of the lawsuits involving Montana legislation that would have impacted the arbitration process and Talen's Bankruptcy delayed commencement of the Arbitration proceedings, and thus delayed resolution of the issues we raised when we commenced arbitration, since resolution of the lawsuits, the owners have initiated efforts to identify arbitrators pursuant to their stipulation entered in the Talen bankruptcy proceeding. Despite the litigation, we have worked and continue to work with the other joint owners to arrive at an agreed upon process for the Arbitration and a commercial resolution to the owners disagreements.
Colstrip Coal Dust Litigation
On December 14, 2020, a claim was filed against Talen, the operator of the Colstrip Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Colstrip), in the Montana Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud County, Cause No. CV-20-58. The plaintiffs allege they have suffered adverse effects from coal dust generated during operations associated with Colstrip. On August 26, 2021, the claim was amended to add in excess of 100 plaintiffs. It also added NorthWestern, as well as the other owners of Colstrip, and Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC, as defendants. Plaintiffs are seeking economic damages, costs and disbursements, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and an injunction prohibiting defendants from allowing coal dust to blow onto plaintiffs’ properties. Talen’s bankruptcy and resulting automatic stay prevents the plaintiffs from pursuing their claims against Talen, but does not automatically prevent the plaintiffs from pursuing their claims against the other defendants. Based on a stipulation and Bankruptcy Court order, Talen's bankruptcy stay, as it concerns this matter, was lifted on February 13, 2023.
Since this lawsuit remains in its early stages, we are unable to predict outcomes or estimate a range of reasonably possible losses.
BNSF Demands for Indemnity and Remediation Costs
NorthWestern has received a demand for indemnity from BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) for past and future environmental investigation and remediation costs incurred by BNSF at one of the three operable units at the Anaconda Copper Mining (ACM) Smelter and Refinery Superfund Site, located near Great Falls, Montana. Smelter and refining operations at the site commenced in 1893 and continued until 1980.
According to U.S. EPA, the smelter and refining operations have contaminated soil, groundwater and surface water resources around the site with lead, arsenic and other metal wastes. ARCO (Atlantic Richfield Company) initiated reclamation and maintenance activities in the 1980s and 1990s. Between 2002 and 2008, the EPA conducted several site investigations. In March 2011, the EPA placed the ACM Smelter and Refinery Site on the Superfund program’s National Priority List. The Superfund Site is 427 acres and contains three operable units: Operable Unit 1 (consisting of five subsections including the Railroad Corridor and four other “areas of interest”), Operable Unit 2 (the former smelter and refinery site), and Operable Unit 3 (the Missouri River that flows along the south sides of Operable Units 1 and 2).
NorthWestern owns property in the Railroad Corridor sub-section of Operable Unit 1. BNSF claims it is entitled to indemnity and contribution from NorthWestern for the costs it has and will incur to investigate and remediate contamination in Operable Unit 1. BNSF reports it has incurred in excess of $4.4 million, pending final resolution of response and oversight costs incurred by government agencies (EPA and Montana DEQ), in investigative and other response costs associated with Operable Unit 1, and that in the future it will incur additional costs to implement the final remedy for Operable Unit 1. In the Record of Decision (ROD) for Operable Unit 1 issued on August 21, 2021, the EPA estimated the costs to implement the selected remedies for the Railroad Corridor will be approximately $4.1 million. In the ROD, the EPA also estimated the costs to implement the selected remedy (including institutional controls) for the four “areas of interest” in Operable Unit 1 would be approximately $1.8 million, with annual operating costs of ten thousand dollars. We are evaluating BNSF’s claim and are unable at this time to predict outcomes or estimate a range of reasonably possible losses.
Other Legal Proceedings
We are also subject to various other legal proceedings, governmental audits and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these other actions will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(19) Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
Accounting Policy
Our revenues are primarily from tariff based sales. We provide gas and/or electricity to customers under these tariffs without a defined contractual term (at-will). As the revenue from these arrangements is equivalent to the electricity or gas supplied and billed in that period (including estimated billings), there will not be a shift in the timing or pattern of revenue recognition for such sales. We have also completed the evaluation of our other revenue streams, including those tied to longer term contractual commitments. These revenue streams have performance obligations that are satisfied at a point in time, and do not have a shift in the timing or pattern of revenue recognition.
Customers are billed monthly on a cycle basis. To match revenues with associated expenses, we accrue unbilled revenues for electric and natural gas services delivered to customers, but not yet billed at month-end.
Nature of Goods and Services
We currently provide retail electric and natural gas services to three primary customer classes. Our largest customer class consists of residential customers, which include single private dwellings and individual apartments. Our commercial customers consist primarily of main street businesses, and our industrial customers consist primarily of manufacturing and processing businesses that turn raw materials into products.
Electric Segment - Our regulated electric utility business primarily provides generation, transmission, and distribution services to our customers in our Montana and South Dakota jurisdictions. We recognize revenue when electricity is delivered to the customer. Payments on our tariff based sales are generally due in 20-30 days after the billing date.
Natural Gas Segment - Our regulated natural gas utility business primarily provides production, storage, transmission, and distribution services to our customers in our Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska jurisdictions. We recognize revenue when natural gas is delivered to the customer. Payments on our tariff based sales are generally due in 20-30 days after the billing date.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following tables disaggregate our revenue for the twelve months ended by major source and customer class (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2022 | Electric | | Natural Gas | | Total | | | | | | |
Montana | 357.4 | | | 152.3 | | | 509.7 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 69.8 | | | 39.2 | | | 109.0 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 35.8 | | | 35.8 | | | | | | | |
Residential | 427.2 | | | 227.3 | | | 654.5 | | | | | | | |
Montana | 368.6 | | | 79.3 | | | 447.9 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 108.2 | | | 28.5 | | | 136.7 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 22.1 | | | 22.1 | | | | | | | |
Commercial | 476.8 | | | 129.9 | | | 606.7 | | | | | | | |
Industrial | 39.8 | | | 1.5 | | | 41.3 | | | | | | | |
Lighting, Governmental, Irrigation, and Interdepartmental | 31.0 | | | 1.9 | | | 32.9 | | | | | | | |
Total Customer Revenues | 974.8 | | | 360.6 | | | 1,335.4 | | | | | | | |
Other Tariff and Contract Based Revenues | 85.7 | | | 38.3 | | | 124.0 | | | | | | | |
Total Revenue from Contracts with Customers | 1,060.5 | | | 398.9 | | | 1,459.4 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory amortization | 46.1 | | | (27.7) | | | 18.4 | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | $ | 1,106.6 | | | $ | 371.2 | | | $ | 1,477.8 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2021 | Electric | | Natural Gas | | Total | | | | | | |
Montana | 334.6 | | | 126.0 | | | 460.6 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 65.4 | | | 26.6 | | | 92.0 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 21.0 | | | 21.0 | | | | | | | |
Residential | 400.0 | | | 173.6 | | | 573.6 | | | | | | | |
Montana | 356.7 | | | 64.7 | | | 421.4 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 102.5 | | | 19.1 | | | 121.6 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 11.4 | | | 11.4 | | | | | | | |
Commercial | 459.2 | | | 95.2 | | | 554.4 | | | | | | | |
Industrial | 37.9 | | | 1.1 | | | 39.0 | | | | | | | |
Lighting, Governmental, Irrigation, and Interdepartmental | 32.1 | | | 1.4 | | | 33.5 | | | | | | | |
Total Customer Revenues | 929.2 | | | 271.3 | | | 1,200.5 | | | | | | | |
Other Tariff and Contract Based Revenues | 89.5 | | | 36.8 | | | 126.3 | | | | | | | |
Total Revenue from Contracts with Customers | 1,018.7 | | | 308.1 | | | 1,326.8 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory amortization | 33.5 | | | 12.0 | | | 45.5 | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | $ | 1,052.2 | | | $ | 320.1 | | | $ | 1,372.3 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2020 | Electric | | Natural Gas | | Total | | | | | | |
Montana | 320.8 | | | 103.5 | | | 424.3 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 66.6 | | | 21.5 | | | 88.1 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 16.9 | | | 16.9 | | | | | | | |
Residential | 387.4 | | | 141.9 | | | 529.3 | | | | | | | |
Montana | 338.3 | | | 51.3 | | | 389.6 | | | | | | | |
South Dakota | 101.1 | | | 14.3 | | | 115.4 | | | | | | | |
Nebraska | — | | | 8.1 | | | 8.1 | | | | | | | |
Commercial | 439.4 | | | 73.7 | | | 513.1 | | | | | | | |
Industrial | 36.8 | | | 0.9 | | | 37.7 | | | | | | | |
Lighting, Governmental, Irrigation, and Interdepartmental | 31.8 | | | 0.9 | | | 32.7 | | | | | | | |
Total Customer Revenues | 895.4 | | | 217.4 | | | 1,112.8 | | | | | | | |
Other Tariff and Contract Based Revenues | 58.5 | | | 35.5 | | | 94.0 | | | | | | | |
Total Revenue from Contracts with Customers | 953.9 | | | 252.9 | | | 1,206.8 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Regulatory amortization | (13.1) | | | 5.0 | | | (8.1) | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | $ | 940.8 | | | $ | 257.9 | | | $ | 1,198.7 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(20) Segment and Related Information |
Our reportable business segments are primarily engaged in the electric and natural gas business. The remainder of our operations are presented as other, which primarily consists of unallocated corporate costs and unregulated activity.
We evaluate the performance of these segments based on utility margin. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the parent except that the parent allocates some of its operating expenses to the operating segments according to a methodology designed by management for internal reporting purposes and involves estimates and assumptions.
Financial data for the business segments for the twelve months ended are as follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2022 | Electric | | Gas | | Other | | Eliminations | | Total |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,106,565 | | | $ | 371,272 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,477,837 | |
Fuel, purchased supply and direct transmission expense (exclusive of depreciation and depletion shown separately below) | 324,434 | | | 167,577 | | | — | | | — | | | 492,011 | |
Utility Margin | 782,131 | | | 203,695 | | | — | | | — | | | 985,826 | |
Operating and maintenance | 167,798 | | | 53,629 | | | — | | | — | | | 221,427 | |
Administrative and general | 82,405 | | | 31,002 | | | 369 | | | — | | | 113,776 | |
Property and other taxes | 149,781 | | | 42,734 | | | 9 | | | — | | | 192,524 | |
Depreciation and depletion | 162,404 | | | 32,616 | | | — | | | — | | | 195,020 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | 219,743 | | | 43,714 | | | (378) | | | — | | | 263,079 | |
Interest expense, net | (74,420) | | | (13,030) | | | (12,660) | | | — | | | (100,110) | |
Other income, net | 12,491 | | | 6,399 | | | 544 | | | — | | | 19,434 | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | 798 | | | (3,108) | | | 2,915 | | | — | | | 605 | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 158,612 | | | $ | 33,975 | | | $ | (9,579) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 183,008 | |
Total assets | $ | 5,892,508 | | | $ | 1,418,059 | | | $ | 7,216 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,317,783 | |
Capital expenditures | $ | 409,707 | | | $ | 105,433 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 515,140 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2021 | Electric | | Gas | | Other | | Eliminations | | Total |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,052,182 | | | $ | 320,134 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,372,316 | |
Fuel, purchased supply and direct transmission expense (exclusive of depreciation and depletion shown separately below) | 294,820 | | | 130,728 | | | — | | | — | | | 425,548 | |
Utility margin | 757,362 | | | 189,406 | | | — | | | — | | | 946,768 | |
Operating and maintenance | 156,383 | | | 51,920 | | | — | | | — | | | 208,303 | |
Administrative and general | 72,641 | | | 27,550 | | | 1,682 | | | — | | | 101,873 | |
Property and other taxes | 134,910 | | | 38,526 | | | 8 | | | — | | | 173,444 | |
Depreciation and depletion | 154,626 | | | 32,841 | | | — | | | — | | | 187,467 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | 238,802 | | | 38,569 | | | (1,690) | | | — | | | 275,681 | |
Interest expense, net | (82,678) | | | (6,083) | | | (4,913) | | | — | | | (93,674) | |
Other income, net | 3,676 | | | 3,046 | | | 1,530 | | | — | | | 8,252 | |
Income tax (expense) benefit | (2,512) | | | (2,640) | | | 1,733 | | | — | | | (3,419) | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 157,288 | | | $ | 32,892 | | | $ | (3,340) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 186,840 | |
Total assets | $ | 5,432,578 | | | $ | 1,342,031 | | | $ | 5,834 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,780,443 | |
Capital expenditures | $ | 354,775 | | | $ | 79,553 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 434,328 | |