UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
Commission file number 1-04851
 
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
OHIO
  
34-0526850
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
101 West Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
  
44115-1075
(Address of principal executive offices)
  
(Zip Code)
(216) 566-2000
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
  
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, Par Value $1.00
  
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes   x         No   o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.        Yes   o         No   x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.        Yes   x         No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).        Yes   x         No   o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.         o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer     x
 
Accelerated filer     o
  
Non-accelerated filer     o
 
Smaller reporting company     o
 
 
 
  
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).         Yes   o         No   x
At January 31, 2014 , 100,296,737  shares of common stock were outstanding, net of treasury shares. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at June 30, 2013 was $18,007,898,468 (computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold on such date).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (“ 2013 Annual Report”) are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV of this report.
Portions of our Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 



THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Table of Contents
 
   
 
Page
 
 
Item 1.
 
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 15.
 
 




PART I
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
Introduction
The Sherwin-Williams Company, founded in 1866 and incorporated in Ohio in 1884, is engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia. Our principal executive offices are located at 101 West Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075, telephone (216) 566-2000. As used in this report, the terms “Sherwin-Williams,” “Company,” “we” and “our” mean The Sherwin-Williams Company and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
Available Information
We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may access these documents on the “Investor Relations” page of our website at www.sherwin.com.
We also make available free of charge on our website our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Director Independence Standards, our Code of Conduct and the charters of our Audit Committee, our Compensation and Management Development Committee and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. You may access these documents in the “Corporate Governance” section on the “Investor Relations” page of our website at www.sherwin.com.
Basis of Reportable Segments
We report our segment information in the same way that management internally organizes our business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). We have four reportable operating segments: Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (individually, a "Reportable Segment" and collectively, the “Reportable Segments”). Factors considered in determining our Reportable Segments include the nature of business activities, the management structure directly accountable to the Company’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) for operating and administrative activities, availability of discrete financial information and information presented to our Board of Directors. We report all other business activities and immaterial operating segments that are not reportable in the Administrative segment. For more information about the Reportable Segments, see pages 6 through 15 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company’s CODM has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer because he has final authority over performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. Because of the diverse operations of the Company, the CODM regularly receives discrete financial information about each Reportable Segment as well as a significant amount of additional financial information about certain divisions, business units or subsidiaries of the Company. The CODM uses all such financial information for performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. The CODM evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to the Reportable Segments based on profit or loss before income taxes and cash generated from operations. The accounting policies of the Reportable Segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  48 through 51 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Paint Stores Group
The Paint Stores Group consisted of 3,908 company-operated specialty paint stores in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Jamaica, Curacao and Aruba at December 31, 2013 . Each store in this segment is engaged in the related business activity of selling paint, coatings and related products to end-use customers. The Paint Stores Group markets and sells Sherwin-Williams ® branded architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) product finishes and related items. These products are produced by manufacturing facilities in the Consumer Group. In addition, each store sells selected purchased associated products. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the business of this segment. During 2013 , this segment acquired 306 stores (226 in the United States and 80 in Canada) and opened 82 net new stores, consisting of 86 new stores opened (75 in the United States, 6 in Canada, 2 in Puerto Rico, 2 in Trinidad and 1 in Jamaica) and 4 stores closed in the United States. During 2012 and 2011 , this segment opened 70 and 60 net new stores, respectively. A map on the cover flap of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference, shows the number of paint stores and their geographic locations. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Paint Stores Group, supplemented with information by geographic region, product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Paint Stores Group as a whole. In

1


accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Paint Stores Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.
Consumer Group
The Consumer Group develops, manufactures and distributes a variety of paint, coatings and related products to third party customers primarily in the United States and Canada and the Paint Stores Group. Approximately 64 percent of the total sales of the Consumer Group in 2013 were intersegment transfers of products primarily sold through the Paint Stores Group. Sales and marketing of certain controlled brand and private labeled products is performed by a direct sales staff. The products distributed through third party customers are intended for resale to the ultimate end-user of the product. The Consumer Group had sales to certain customers that, individually, may be a significant portion of the sales of the segment. However, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the overall profitability of the segment. This segment incurred most of the Company’s capital expenditures related to ongoing environmental compliance measures. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Consumer Group, supplemented with information by product types and customer, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Consumer Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Consumer Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.
Global Finishes Group
The Global Finishes Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of protective and marine products, automotive finishes and refinish products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America, Europe and Asia. This segment meets the demands of its customers for a consistent worldwide product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. This segment licenses certain technology and trade names worldwide. Sherwin-Williams ® and other controlled brand products are distributed through the Paint Stores Group and this segment’s 300 company-operated branches and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, jobbers, licensees and other third party distributors. During 2013 , this segment opened 2 new branches ( 1 in the United States and 1 in Canada) and closed 4 ( 2 in the United States and 2 in Canada) for a net decrease of 2 branches. At December 31, 2013 , the Global Finishes Group consisted of operations in the United States, subsidiaries in 34  foreign countries and income from licensing agreements in 16 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Global Finishes Group, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units, and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Global Finishes Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Global Finishes Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference, shows the number of branches and their geographic locations.
Latin America Coatings Group
The Latin America Coatings Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America. This segment meets the demands of its customers for consistent regional product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. Sherwin-Williams ® and other controlled brand products are distributed through this segment’s 282 company-operated stores and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, licensees and other third party distributors. During 2013 , this segment opened 14 new stores ( 12 in South America and 2 in Mexico) and closed 8 ( 7 in South America and 1 in Mexico) for a net increase of 6 stores. At December 31, 2013 , the Latin America Coatings Group consisted of operations from subsidiaries in 9 foreign countries, 4 foreign joint ventures and income from licensing agreements in 7 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Latin America Coatings Group, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units, and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference, shows the number of stores and their geographic locations.
Administrative Segment
The Administrative segment includes the administrative expenses of the Company’s corporate headquarters site. Also included in the Administrative segment was interest expense, interest and investment income, certain expenses related to closed facilities and environmental-related matters, and other expenses which were not directly associated with the Reportable Segments. The Administrative segment did not include any significant foreign operations. Also included in the Administrative segment was a real estate management unit that is responsible for the ownership, management, and leasing of non-retail properties held primarily for use by the Company, including the Company’s headquarters site, and disposal of idle facilities. Sales of this segment represented external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space or leasing of facilities no longer used

2


by the Company in its primary businesses. Gains and losses from the sale of property were not a significant operating factor in determining the performance of the Administrative segment.
Segment Financial Information
For financial information regarding our Reportable Segments, including net external sales, segment profit, identifiable assets and other information by Reportable Segment, see Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  73 through 76 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Domestic and Foreign Operations
Financial and other information regarding domestic and foreign operations is set forth in Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  74 and 75 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Additional information regarding risks attendant to foreign operations is set forth on page  34 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Market Risk” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Business Developments
For additional information regarding our business and business developments, see pages  6 through 15 of our 2013 Annual Report and the “Letter to Shareholders” on pages  2 through  5 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Raw Materials and Products Purchased for Resale
We believe we generally have adequate sources of raw materials and fuel supplies used in our business. However, consolidation of raw material suppliers and a reduction in raw material manufacturing capacity during the recent recession, along with an increase in global demand for certain raw materials, resulted in increased prices of certain raw materials in 2013 . A continued increase in global demand for certain raw materials and coatings as the global economy recovers may result in increased prices of certain raw materials for the Reportable Segments during 2014 . There are sufficient suppliers of each product purchased for resale that none of the Reportable Segments anticipate any significant sourcing problems during 2014 . See Item 1A Risk Factors for more information regarding cost and sourcing of raw materials.
Seasonality
The majority of the sales for the Reportable Segments traditionally occur during the second and third quarters. There is no significant seasonality in sales for the Administrative segment.
Working Capital
In order to meet increased demand during the second and third quarters, the Company usually builds its inventories during the first quarter. Working capital items (inventories and accounts receivable) are generally financed through short-term borrowings, which include the use of lines of credit and the issuance of commercial paper. For a description of the Company’s liquidity and capital resources, see pages  24 through  34 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Cash Flow” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Trademarks and Trade Names
Customer recognition of our trademarks and trade names collectively contribute significantly to our sales. The major trademarks and trade names used by each of the Reportable Segments are set forth below.
Paint Stores Group:     Sherwin-Williams ® , ProMar ® , SuperPaint ® , A-100 ® , Duron ® , MAB ® , PrepRite ® , Duration ® , Duration Home ® , ProGreen ® , Harmony ® , ProClassic ® , Woodscapes ® , Deckscapes ® , Cashmere ® , HGTV ® Home by Sherwin-Williams, Emerald , Duracraft , Solo ® , ProIndustrial , ProPark ® , Frazee ® , Parker Paints, Kwal ® , Color Wheel and General Paint ® .
Consumer Group:     Dutch Boy ® , Krylon ® , Minwax ® , Thompson’s ® WaterSeal ® , Pratt & Lambert ® , Martin Senour ® , H&C ® , White Lightning ® , Dupli-Color ® , Rubberset ® , Purdy ® , Bestt Liebco ® , Accurate Dispersions , Uniflex ® , VHT ® , Kool Seal ® , Snow Roof ® , Altax , Tri-Flow ® , Sprayon ® , Ronseal , DuraSeal ® , Geocel ® , Conco ® , Duckback ® , Superdeck ® and Mason's Select ® .
Global Finishes Group:     Sherwin-Williams ® , Lazzuril ® , Excelo ® , Baco ® , Planet Color ® , AWX Performance Plus , Ultra , Ultra-Cure ® , Martin Senour ® , Kem Aqua ® , Sher-Wood ® , Powdura ® , Polane ® , Euronavy ® , Inchem ® , Sayerlack ® , Becker Acroma ® , Firetex ® , Macropoxy ® , Oece , Arti , Acrolon ® , Sher-Nar ® , PermaClad ® , Heat-Flex ® , Magnalux , ATX , Genesis ® , Dimension ® , Finish 1 , Lanet , DFL , Conely , Envirolastic ® and Fastline .

3


Latin America Coatings Group:     Sherwin-Williams ® , Marson ® , Metalatex ® , Novacor ® , Loxon ® , Colorgin ® , Andina ® , Napko , Martin Senour ® , Sumare ® , Condor ® , Euronavy ® , Krylon ® , Kem Tone ® , Minwax ® and Pratt & Lambert ® .
Patents
Although patents and licenses are not of material importance to our business as a whole or any segment, the Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group derive a portion of their income from the licensing of technology, trademarks and trade names to foreign companies.
Backlog and Productive Capacity
Backlog orders are not significant in the business of any Reportable Segment since there is normally a short period of time between the placing of an order and shipment. We believe that sufficient productive capacity currently exists to fulfill our needs for paint, coatings and related products through 2014 .
Research and Development
For information regarding our costs of research and development included in technical expenditures, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  50 and 51 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Competition
We experience competition from many local, regional, national and international competitors of various sizes in the manufacture, distribution and sale of our paint, coatings and related products. We are a leading manufacturer and retailer of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers, however, our competitive position varies for our different products and markets.
In the Paint Stores Group, competitors include other paint and wallpaper stores, mass merchandisers, home centers, independent hardware stores, hardware chains and manufacturer-operated direct outlets. Product quality, product innovation, breadth of product line, technical expertise, service and price determine the competitive advantage for this segment.
In the Consumer Group, domestic and foreign competitors include manufacturers and distributors of branded and private labeled paint and coatings products. Technology, product quality, product innovation, breadth of product line, technical expertise, distribution, service and price are the key competitive factors for this segment.
The Global Finishes Group has numerous competitors in its domestic and foreign markets with broad product offerings and several others with niche products. Key competitive factors for this segment include technology, product quality, product innovation, breadth of product line, technical expertise, distribution, service and price.
In the Latin America Coatings Group, competitors include other paint and wallpaper stores, mass merchandisers, home centers, independent hardware stores, hardware chains and manufacturer-operated direct outlets. Product quality, product innovation, breadth of product line, technical expertise, service and price determine the competitive advantage for this segment.
The Administrative segment has many competitors consisting of other real estate owners, developers and managers in areas in which this segment owns property. The main competitive factors are the availability of property and price.
Employees
We employed 37,633 persons at December 31, 2013 .
Environmental Compliance
For additional information regarding environmental-related matters, see pages  27 and 29 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Environmental-Related Liabilities” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Notes  1 , 8 and 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 50 , 62 and 69 , respectively, of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management's current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and the costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters and the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified

4


by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “plans to” and similar expressions.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from our historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include such things as:
general business conditions, strengths of retail and manufacturing economies and the growth in the coatings industry;
competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation and quality;
changes in raw material and energy supplies and pricing;
changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers;
our ability to attain cost savings from productivity initiatives;
our ability to successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into our existing operations, including the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico and the recent acquisitions of the Comex business in the United States and Canada, Geocel Holdings Corporation and Jiangsu Pulanna Coating Co., Ltd., as well as the performance of the businesses acquired;
legal, regulatory and other matters that may affect the timing of or our ability to complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico;
risks and uncertainties associated with our ownership of Life Shield Engineered Systems, LLC;
changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, and changing government policies, laws and regulations;
risks and uncertainties associated with our expansion into and our operations in Asia, Europe, Mexico, South America and other foreign markets, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest and other external economic and political factors;
the achievement of growth in foreign markets, such as Asia, Europe, Mexico and South America;
increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting health, safety and the environment;
inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our potential liability for environmental-related activities;
other changes in governmental policies, laws and regulations, including changes in accounting policies and standards and taxation requirements (such as new tax laws and new or revised tax law interpretations);
the nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, and the effect of any legislation and administrative regulations relating thereto; and
unusual weather conditions.
Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
Described below and elsewhere in this report and other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission are risks, uncertainties and other factors that can adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Adverse changes in general business and economic conditions in the United States and worldwide may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Adverse changes in general business and economic conditions in the United States and worldwide may reduce the demand for some of our products and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition. Higher inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates and unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, changing governmental policies, laws and regulations, and other economic factors could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
A weakening or reversal of the general economic recovery in the United States and other countries and regions in which we do business, or the continuation or worsening of the economic downturn in other countries and regions, may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Global economic uncertainty continues to exist. A weakening or reversal of the general economic recovery in the United States and other countries and regions in which we do business, or the continuation or worsening of the economic downturn in other countries and regions, may adversely impact our net sales, the collection of accounts receivable, funding for working

5


capital needs, expected cash flow generation from current and acquired businesses, and our investments, which may adversely impact our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
We finance a portion of our sales through trade credit. Credit markets remain tight, and some customers who require financing for their businesses have not been able to obtain necessary financing. A continuation or worsening of these conditions could limit our ability to collect our accounts receivable, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
We generally fund a portion of our seasonal working capital needs and obtain funding for other general corporate purposes through short-term borrowings backed by our revolving credit facility and other financing facilities. If any of the banks in these credit and financing facilities are unable to perform on their commitments, which could adversely affect our ability to fund seasonal working capital needs and obtain funding for other general corporate purposes, our cash flow, liquidity or financial condition could be adversely impacted.
Although we currently have available credit facilities to fund our current operating needs, we cannot be certain that we will be able to replace our existing credit facilities or refinance our existing or future debt when necessary. Our cost of borrowing and ability to access the capital markets are affected not only by market conditions, but also by our debt and credit ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies. Downgrades in these ratings will increase our cost of borrowing and could have an adverse effect on our access to the capital markets, including our access to the commercial paper market. An inability to access the capital markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
We have goodwill and intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet. We periodically evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of our goodwill and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such value may not be recoverable. Impairment assessment involves judgment as to assumptions regarding future sales and cash flows and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Future events and changing market conditions may impact our assumptions and may result in changes in our estimates of future sales and cash flows that may result in us incurring substantial impairment charges, which would adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
We hold investments in equity and debt securities in some of our defined benefit pension plans. A decrease in the value of plan assets resulting from a general financial downturn may cause a negative pension plan investment performance, which may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Protracted duration of economic downturns in cyclical segments of the economy may depress the demand for some of our products and adversely affect our sales, earnings, cash flow or financial condition.
Portions of our business involve the sale of paint, coatings and related products to segments of the economy that are cyclical in nature, particularly segments relating to construction, housing and manufacturing. Our sales to these segments are affected by the levels of discretionary consumer and business spending in these segments. During economic downturns in these segments, the levels of consumer and business discretionary spending may decrease, and the recovery of these segments may lag behind the recovery of the overall economy. This decrease in spending will likely reduce the demand for some of our products and may adversely affect our sales, earnings, cash flow or financial condition.
During the recent recession, the U.S. homebuilding industry experienced a significant and sustained decrease in demand for new homes and an oversupply of new and existing homes available for sale. During this same time period, the U.S. real estate industry also experienced a significant decrease in existing home turnover. The commercial and industrial building and maintenance sectors also experienced a significant decline. The downturn in each of these segments contributed to an unprecedented decline in the demand for some of our products. The recovery in new home starts, existing home sales and new commercial construction has been sluggish and erratic in many markets and remain below their pre-recession highs. Challenging market conditions are expected to continue for the foreseeable future and may worsen. A worsening in these segments will reduce the demand for some of our products and may adversely impact sales, earnings and cash flow.
Increases in the cost of raw materials and energy may adversely affect our earnings or cash flow.
We purchase raw materials (including titanium dioxide and proplylene) and energy for use in the manufacturing, distribution and sale of our products. Factors such as adverse weather conditions, including hurricanes, and other disasters can disrupt raw material and fuel supplies and increase our costs. In addition, many raw material suppliers decreased manufacturing capacity during the recent recession. Continued economic recovery has caused and may continue to cause demand pressure on raw material supplies. The decrease in manufacturing capacity, along with strong global demand for certain raw materials, has caused and may continue to cause tight supplies and significant price increases, especially in titanium dioxide and petrochemicals, which are key ingredients used in the manufacture of paint and coatings. Although raw materials and energy supplies (including oil and natural gas) are generally available from various sources in sufficient quantities, unexpected shortages and increases in the cost of raw materials and energy, or any deterioration in our relationships with or the financial viability of our suppliers, may have an adverse effect on our earnings or cash flow in the event we are unable to offset higher

6


costs in a timely manner by sufficiently decreasing our operating costs or raising the prices of our products. While we have experienced some easing of the prices of certain raw materials recently, raw material pricing has in the past and likely will in the future experience periods of volatility.
Although we have an extensive customer base, the loss of any of our largest customers could adversely affect our sales, earnings or cash flow.
We have a large and varied customer base due to our extensive distribution network. During 2013 , no individual customer accounted for sales totaling more than ten percent of our sales. However, we have some customers that, individually, purchase a large amount of products from us. Although our broad distribution channels help to minimize the impact of the loss of any one customer, the loss of any of these large customers could have an adverse effect on our sales, earnings or cash flow.
Adverse weather conditions may temporarily reduce the demand for some of our products and could have a negative effect on our sales, earnings or cash flow.
From time to time, adverse weather conditions in certain parts of the United States have had an adverse effect on our sales of paint, coatings and related products. For example, unusually cold and rainy weather, especially during the exterior painting season, could have an adverse effect on sales of our exterior paint products. An adverse effect on sales may cause a reduction in our earnings or cash flow.
Increased competition may reduce our sales, earnings or cash flow performance.
We face substantial competition from many international, national, regional and local competitors of various sizes in the manufacture, distribution and sale of our paint, coatings and related products. Some of our competitors are larger than us and have greater financial resources to compete. Other competitors are smaller and may be able to offer more specialized products. Technology, product quality, product innovation, breadth of product line, technical expertise, distribution, service and price are the key competitive factors for our business. Competition in any of these areas may reduce our sales and adversely affect our earnings or cash flow by resulting in decreased sales volumes, reduced prices and increased costs of manufacturing, distributing and selling our products.
Our pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico may not occur, which may negatively affect the trading prices of our stock and our future business and financial results.
On November 9, 2012, we and Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V., one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. and Conaxe, S.A. de C.V., for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.34 billion in cash, including assumed debt. Founded in 1952, Comex is a privately held business with operations in Latin America, and at the time, in the United States and Canada. In 2011, Comex had total annual sales of approximately U.S. $1.4 billion.
On July 17, 2013, the Federal Competition Commission of Mexico (the "FCC") informed us that the acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico was not authorized, and a subsequent appeal to the FCC was also denied on October 29, 2013. In the meantime, on September 16, 2013, we completed the acquisition of the Comex business in the United States and Canada. Also on September 16, 2013, the Stock Purchase Agreement for the purchase of the Comex business in Mexico was amended and restated to extend the date by which the agreement can be terminated by either party to March 31, 2014 and to reflect a revised purchase price of approximately $2.25 billion.
The closing of the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico remains subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including, among others, the consent, waiver or authorization of the Federal Economic Competition Commission. Completion of the acquisition is not assured, and there is no assurance that it will be completed. The acquisition is subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risk that the necessary regulatory approvals are not obtained or that other closing conditions are not satisfied. If the acquisition is not completed, or if there are significant delays in completing the acquisition, it could negatively affect the trading prices of our common stock and our future business and financial results.
Our obligation to complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico is not subject to a financing condition.
Our obligation to complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico is not subject to a financing condition. In December 2012, we incurred $1 billion of indebtedness by issuing senior notes due 2017 and 2042, a portion of which we plan to use to pay part of the purchase price of the acquisition. We also plan to pay part of the purchase price of the acquisition by borrowing through existing credit facilities and other financing facilities, which we may refinance by issuing additional long-term debt in the future. If any of the banks in these credit and financing facilities are unable to perform their commitments, we may be required to finance a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition at interest rates higher than currently expected. If we are unable to borrow the necessary funds to complete the acquisition, or if we are not otherwise able to pay the purchase price, we may not be able to complete the acquisition and will be in breach of the purchase agreement.

7


We may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico at all or in the expected time frame.
The success of the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies from combining and integrating the Comex business with our existing business during a challenging global economic environment. We may not be able to achieve expected objectives, or may not able to achieve these objectives on a timely basis, and the anticipated benefits and synergies therefore may not be realized fully or at all.
The acquisition involves challenges and risks, including risks that the transaction does not advance our business strategy or that we will not realize a satisfactory return. The challenges include, among others (i) the diversion of the attention of management and other employees to integration matters; (ii) difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects from combining the business of Comex with our existing business; (iii) difficulties in managing the expanded operations of a larger and more complex company with an expanded presence in Latin America; (iv) challenges in keeping existing customers and obtaining new customers; and (v) challenges in retaining key employees and integrating a workforce while maintaining focus on providing high quality customer service. Any integration difficulties could decrease or eliminate the anticipated benefits and synergies of the acquisition and could negatively affect the trading prices of our stock and our future business and financial results.
To service our debt, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. We also depend on the business of our subsidiaries to satisfy our cash needs. If we cannot generate the required cash, we may not be able to make the necessary payments required under our indebtedness.
At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had total debt of approximately $1.7 billion , a significant increase over our total debt of approximately $990 million at December 31, 2011. We have the ability under our existing credit facilities to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, and we plan to incur significant additional indebtedness in the event we complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico. Our ability to make payments on our debt, fund our other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our historical financial results have been, and we anticipate that our future financial results will be, subject to fluctuations. Our ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to make payments of our debt, fund our other liquidity needs and make planned capital expenditures.
The degree to which we are currently leveraged and will be leveraged following the completion of the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico could have important consequences to shareholders. For example, it could:
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to comply with covenants in the instruments governing our debt could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, would have a material adverse effect on us.
A significant portion of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow for our needs is dependent to some extent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and the payment of those earnings to us in the form of dividends, loans or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Our subsidiaries have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or to provide us with funds to meet our cash flow needs, whether in the form of dividends, distributions, loans or other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, loans or advances by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we are a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us. Finally, changes in the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we operate may adversely affect the ability of some of our foreign subsidiaries to repatriate funds to us.

8


Our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition may be negatively impacted if we do not successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into our existing operations and if the performance of the businesses we acquire do not meet our expectations.
We have historically made strategic acquisitions of businesses in the paint and coatings industry and will likely acquire additional businesses in the future as part of our long-term growth strategy. In 2012, we acquired Geocel Holdings Corporation, which manufactures innovative caulks, sealants, and adhesives specially designed for tough construction and repair applications in commercial, residential, industrial and transport non-automotive markets. Geocel has operations in both the United States and United Kingdom. In 2012, we also acquired Jiangsu Pulanna Coating Co., Ltd., a leading automotive refinishes coatings manufacturer in China. In 2013, we acquired the Comex business in the United States and Canada. These acquisitions, along with the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico, involve challenges and risks. In the event that we do not successfully integrate these acquisitions into our existing operations so as to realize the expected return on our investment, our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition could be adversely affected.
Risks and uncertainties associated with our expansion into and our operations in Asia, Europe, Mexico, South America and other foreign markets could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Net external sales of our consolidated foreign subsidiaries totaled approximately 20.9%, 21.5% and 22.6% of our total consolidated net sales in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. This percentage is expected to increase in 2014 in the event we complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico. Sales outside of the United States make up a growing and significant part of our current business and future strategic plans. Our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition could be adversely affected by a variety of international factors, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign currency exchange controls, interest rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations and other external economic and political factors. Our inability to successfully manage the risks and uncertainties relating to these factors could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
In many foreign countries, it is acceptable to engage in certain business practices that we are prohibited from engaging in because of regulations that are applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK Bribery Act. Although we have internal control policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these regulations, there can be no assurance that our policies and procedures will prevent a violation of these regulations. Any violation could cause an adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
Because of our international operations, we are exposed to risk associated with interest rates and value changes in foreign currencies, which may adversely affect our business. Historically, our reported net sales, earnings, cash flow and financial condition have been subjected to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Our primary exchange rate exposure is with the euro, the British pound, the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real, the Chilean peso, the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. While we actively manage the exposure of our foreign currency risk as part of our overall financial risk management policy, we believe we may experience losses from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and such losses could adversely affect our sales, earnings, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
We are subject to a wide variety of complex domestic and foreign laws and regulations, for which compliance could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
We are subject to a wide variety of complex domestic and foreign laws and regulations, and legal compliance risks, including securities laws, tax laws, employment and pension-related laws, competition laws, U.S. and foreign export and trading laws, and laws governing improper business practices. We are affected by new laws and regulations, and changes to existing laws and regulations, including interpretations by courts and regulators. From time to time, our Company, our operations and the industries in which we operate are being reviewed or investigated by regulators, which could lead to enforcement actions or the assertion of private litigation claims and damages.
Although we believe that we have adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs to mitigate these risks, the global and diverse nature of our operations means that compliance risks will continue to exist. Investigations, examinations and other proceedings, the nature and outcome of which cannot be predicted, will likely arise from time to time. These investigations, examinations and other proceedings could subject us to significant liability and require us to take significant accruals or pay significant settlements, fines and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
We are subject to tax laws and regulations in the United States and multiple foreign jurisdictions. We are affected by changes in tax laws and regulations, as well as changes in related interpretations and other tax guidance. In the ordinary course

9


of our business, we are subject to examinations and investigations by various tax authorities. In addition to existing examinations and investigations, there could be additional examinations and investigations in the future, and existing examinations and investigations could be expanded.
For non-income tax risks, we estimate material loss contingencies and accrue for such loss contingencies as required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles based on our assessment of contingencies where liability is deemed probable and reasonably estimable in light of the facts and circumstances known to us at a particular point in time. Subsequent developments may affect our assessment and estimates of the loss contingency. In the event the loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to us may result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued or paid. For income tax risks, we recognize tax benefits based on our assessment that a tax benefit has a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon ultimate settlement with the applicable taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant facts. For those income tax positions where we assess that there is not a greater than 50% likelihood that such tax benefits will be sustained, we do not recognize a tax benefit in our financial statements. Subsequent events may cause us to change our assessment of the likelihood of sustaining a previously-recognized benefit which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow or financial position for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued or paid.
We discuss risks and uncertainties with regard to taxes in more detail in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 70 and 71 of our 2013 Annual Report.
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer, employee, supplier or Company information, whether through a breach of our computer systems, including cyber attacks or otherwise, could severely harm our business.
As part of our business, we collect, process, and retain sensitive and confidential personal information about our customers, employees and suppliers. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of the retailers, dealers, licensees and other third party distributors with which we do business, may be vulnerable to security breaches, cyber attacks, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer, employee, supplier or Company information, whether by us or by the retailers, dealers, licensees and other third party distributors with which we do business, could result in losses, severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and privacy is increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, and compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs.
We are required to comply with numerous complex and increasingly stringent domestic and foreign health, safety and environmental laws and regulations, the cost of which is likely to increase and may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
Our operations are subject to various domestic and foreign health, safety and environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern our current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on us for our past operations. We expect health, safety and environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon our industry and us in the future. Our costs to comply with these laws and regulations may increase as these requirements become more stringent in the future, and these increased costs may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
We are involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of our currently and formerly owned sites, as well as a number of third-party sites, for which our ultimate liability may exceed the current amount we have accrued.
We are involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of our currently and formerly owned sites and a number of third-party sites. We accrue for estimated costs of investigation and remediation activities at these sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are based on currently available facts regarding each site. We continuously assess our potential liability for investigation and remediation activities and adjust our environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated. Due to the uncertainties surrounding environmental investigation and remediation activities, our liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued and may have an adverse affect on our earnings. We discuss these risks and

10


uncertainties in more detail on page 23 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Environmental Matters,” pages 27 and 29 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Environmental-Related Liabilities” and in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 62 and 63 of our 2013 Annual Report.
The nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation, such as litigation arising from the historical manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paint, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity and financial condition.
In the course of our business, we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to us. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, we accrue for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that a loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to us may result in a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred even if the possibility may be remote.
Our past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. Along with other companies, we are a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs are seeking recovery based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. We are also a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints which seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. We believe that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and are vigorously defending such litigation. We expect that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against us in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.
Notwithstanding our views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and we ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings, such as the court's decision in the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, the jury verdict against us and other defendants in the State of Rhode Island action and the Wisconsin State Supreme Court’s determination that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory may apply in the lead pigment litigation, or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against us and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which we and other manufacturers have been successful.
Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings, or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against us. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or any such legislation and regulations. We have not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from such legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to us relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other

11


remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to us arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
A trial commenced in the Santa Clara County, California proceeding on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants, and holding the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company has filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment, and will file a notice of appeal at the appropriate time. However, if the appeal process is unsuccessful at reversing the decision or otherwise reducing the amount of the judgment, we and the other defendants will be subject to significant liabilities, costs and expenses to abate the public nuisance in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs' jurisdictions and could encourage an increase in future public nuisance claims and proceedings. Any adverse court rulings or any determinations of liability against us may result in a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
We discuss the risks and uncertainties related to litigation, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, in more detail on page 23 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities,” and pages  31 through 34 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Litigation” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  63 through 66 of our 2013 Annual Report.
The costs or potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to us due to our ownership of Life Shield could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
We own Life Shield Engineered Systems, LLC, which ceased operations in 2012. Life Shield developed and manufactured blast and fragment mitigating systems. The blast and fragment mitigating systems create a potentially higher level of product liability for us than is normally associated with coatings and related products we manufacture, distribute and sell. Depending upon the extent of any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to us relating to Life Shield, such liability could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, liquidity or financial condition. We discuss these risks and uncertainties in more detail on page 31 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Contingent Liabilities” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

12


ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES
We own our world headquarters located in Cleveland, Ohio, which includes the world headquarters for the Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group. Our principal manufacturing and distribution facilities are located as set forth below. We believe our manufacturing and distribution facilities are well-maintained and are suitable and adequate, and have sufficient productive capacity, to meet our current needs.

CONSUMER GROUP
 
Manufacturing Facilities
Andover, Kansas
Owned
 
Homewood, Illinois
Owned
Arlington, Texas
Owned
 
Jeffersonville, Indiana
Owned
Baltimore, Maryland
Owned
 
Lawrenceville, Georgia
Owned
Bedford Heights, Ohio
Owned
 
Manchester, Georgia
Owned
Beltsville, Maryland
Owned
 
Memphis, Tennessee
Owned
Bonham, Texas
Owned
 
Morrow, Georgia
Owned
Chicago, Illinois
Owned
 
Ontario, California
Leased
Chico, California
Leased
 
Orlando, Florida
Owned
Cincinnati, Ohio
Owned
 
Plymouth, United Kingdom
Leased
Columbus, Ohio
Owned
 
Portland, Oregon
Leased
Crisfield, Maryland
Leased
 
Rexdale, Ontario, Canada
Owned
Elkhart, Indiana
Owned
 
Richmond, Kentucky
Owned
Ennis, Texas
Owned
 
Rockford, Illinois
Leased
Fernley, Nevada
Owned
 
San Diego, California
Owned
Flora, Illinois
Owned
 
Shawinigan, Quebec, Canada
Leased
Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada
Owned
 
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Owned
Garland, Texas
Owned
 
South Holland, Illinois
Owned
Greensboro, North Carolina (2)
Owned
 
Szamotuly, Poland
Owned
Grimsby, Ontario, Canada
Owned
 
Tacoma, Washington
Leased
Grove City, Ohio
Owned
 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Leased
Holland, Michigan
Owned
 
Victorville, California
Owned
 
Distribution Facilities
Aurora, Colorado
Leased
 
Reno, Nevada
Leased
Bonham, Texas
Owned
 
Richmond, Kentucky
Owned
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Leased
 
Shawinigan, Quebec, Canada
Leased
Buford, Georgia
Leased
 
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Owned
Chico, California
Leased
 
Swaffham, United Kingdom
Leased
Effingham, Illinois
Leased
 
Szamotuly, Poland
Owned
Fredericksburg, Pennsylvania
Owned
 
Tacoma, Washington
Owned
Moreno Valley, California
Leased
 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Leased
Orlando, Florida
Owned
 
Waco, Texas
Leased
Phoenix, Arizona
Owned
 
Winter Haven, Florida
Owned
 

13


GLOBAL FINISHES GROUP
 
Manufacturing Facilities
Bello, Sweden
Owned
 
Pianoro, Italy
Owned
Binh Duong Province, Vietnam
Owned
 
Saint Cheron, France
Owned
Bolton, United Kingdom
Owned
 
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Owned
Brantford, Ontario, Canada
Owned
 
Shanghai, China
Leased
Cavezzo, Italy
Owned
 
Texcoco, Mexico
Owned
Changzhou, China
Leased
 
Valencia, Spain
Owned
Mariano Comense, Italy
Owned
 
Wuppertal, Germany
Owned
Marsta, Sweden
Owned
 
Zhao Qing, China
Leased
Pasir Gudang, Johor, Malaysia
Owned
 
 
 
 
Distribution Facilities
Bolton, United Kingdom
Owned
 
Nassjo, Sweden
Leased
Cavezzo, Italy
Leased
 
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Owned
Changzhou, China
Owned
 
Shanghai, China
Owned
Guadalajara, Mexico
Leased
 
Texcoco, Mexico
Owned
Lima, Peru
Leased
 
Valencia, Venezuela
Leased
Mexico City, Mexico
Owned
 
Quito, Ecuador
Owned
 
LATIN AMERICA COATINGS GROUP
 
Manufacturing Facilities
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Owned
 
Sao Paulo, Brazil (2)
Owned
Montevideo City, Uruguay
Owned
 
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Leased
Santiago, Chile
Owned
 
Quito, Ecuador
Owned
Santiago, Chile (2)
Leased
 
Vallejo, Mexico
Owned
 
Distribution Facilities
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Owned
 
Montevideo City, Uruguay
Owned
Hermosillo, Mexico
Leased
 
Quito, Ecuador
Owned
Lima, Peru
Leased
 
Santa Catarina, Brazil
Leased
Machala, Ecuador
Leased
 
Santiago, Chile
Owned
Maceio, Brazil
Leased
 
Sao Paulo, Brazil (2)
Owned
Monterrey, Mexico
Owned
 
Vallejo, Mexico
Owned
The operations of the Paint Stores Group included a manufacturing and distribution facility in Jamaica and 3,908 company-operated specialty paint stores, of which 207 were owned, in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Jamaica, Curacao and Aruba at December 31, 2013 . These paint stores are divided into four separate operating divisions that are responsible for the sale of predominantly architectural, protective and marine and related products through the paint stores located within their geographical region. At the end of 2013 :
the Mid Western Division operated 999 paint stores primarily located in the midwestern and upper west coast states;
the Eastern Division operated 782 paint stores along the upper east coast and New England states;
the Canada Division operated 185 paint stores throughout Canada;
the Southeastern Division operated a manufacturing and distribution facility in Jamaica and 1,009 paint stores principally covering the lower east and gulf coast states, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Virgin Islands, Curacao and Aruba; and
the South Western Division operated 933 paint stores in the central plains and the lower west coast states.

14


In 2013 , the Paint Stores Group acquired 306 stores (226 in the United States and 80 in Canada) and opened 82 net new paint stores, consisting of 86 new stores opened (75 in the United States, 6 in Canada, 2 in Puerto Rico, 2 in Trinidad and 1 in Jamaica) and 4 stores closed in the United States.
The Global Finishes Group operated 241 branches in the United States, of which 8 were owned, at December 31, 2013 . The Global Finishes Group also operated 59 branches internationally, of which 7 were owned, at December 31, 2013 , consisting of branches in Canada (24), Europe (16), Chile (14), Mexico (3), Peru (1) and Thailand (1). During 2013 , the Global Finishes Group opened 2 new branches ( 1 in the United States and 1 in Canada) and closed 4  ( 2 in the United States and 2 in Canada) for a net decrease of 2 branches.
The Latin America Coatings Group operated 282 stores, of which 9 were owned, at December 31, 2013 , consisting of stores in Mexico (121), Brazil (88), Chile (40), Ecuador (18), Uruguay (10), Peru (3) and Colombia (2). During 2013 , the Latin America Coatings Group opened 14 new stores ( 12 in South America and 2 in Mexico) and closed 8 ( 7 in South America and 1 in Mexico) for a net increase of 6 stores.
All real property within the Administrative segment is owned by us. For additional information regarding real property within the Administrative segment, see the information set forth in Item 1 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
For additional information regarding real property leases, see Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page  73 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information regarding environmental-related matters and other legal proceedings, see pages  27 and  29 , and 31 through 34 , of our 2013 Annual Report under the captions “Environmental-Related Liabilities” and “Litigation” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Notes  1 , 8 , 9 and 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages  50 , 62 and 63 , 63 through 66 and 69 and 70 , respectively, of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following is the name, age and present position of each of our executive officers at February 19, 2014 , as well as all prior positions held by each during the last five years and the date when each was first elected or appointed as an executive officer. Executive officers are generally elected annually by the Board of Directors and hold office until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.
 
Name
Age
Present Position
Date When
First Elected
or Appointed
Christopher M. Connor
57
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Director
1994
John G. Morikis
50
President and Chief Operating Officer
1999
Sean P. Hennessy
56
Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer
2001
Thomas E. Hopkins
56
Senior Vice President – Human Resources
1997
Catherine M. Kilbane
50
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
2013
Steven J. Oberfeld
61
Senior Vice President – Corporate Planning and Development
2006
Robert J. Wells
56
Senior Vice President – Corporate Communications and Public Affairs
2006
Robert J. Davisson
53
President, Paint Stores Group
2010
George E. Heath
48
President, Global Finishes Group
2008
Timothy A. Knight
49
President, Latin America Coatings Group
2011
Allen J. Mistysyn
45
Vice President – Corporate Controller
2010

Mr. Connor has served as Chairman since April 2000 and Chief Executive Officer since October 1999. Mr. Connor has served as a Director since October 1999 and has been employed with the Company since January 1983.
Mr. Morikis has served as President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2006. Mr. Morikis has been employed with the Company since December 1984.

15


Mr. Hennessy has served as Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer since August 2001. Mr. Hennessy has been employed with the Company since September 1984.
Mr. Hopkins has served as Senior Vice President – Human Resources since February 2002. Mr. Hopkins has been employed with the Company since September 1981.
Ms. Kilbane has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Kilbane was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of American Greetings Corporation from October 2003 to December 2012. Ms. Kilbane has been employed with the Company since January 2013.
Mr. Oberfeld has served as Senior Vice President – Corporate Planning and Development since November 2010. Mr. Oberfeld served as President, Paint Stores Group from October 2006 to November 2010. Mr. Oberfeld has been employed with the Company since October 1984.
Mr. Wells has served as Senior Vice President – Corporate Communications and Public Affairs since February 2009. Mr. Wells served as Vice President – Corporate Communications and Public Affairs from January 2006 to February 2009. Mr. Wells has been employed with the Company since May 1998.
Mr. Davisson has served as President, Paint Stores Group since November 2010. Mr. Davisson served as President & General Manager, Southeastern Division, Paint Stores Group from October 1999 to November 2010. Mr. Davisson has been employed with the Company since April 1986.
Mr. Heath has served as President, Global Finishes Group since September 2008. Mr. Heath has been employed with the Company since May 2004.
Mr. Knight has served as President, Latin America Coatings Group since November 2010. Mr. Knight served as Senior Vice President – Corporate Planning and Development from February 2007 to November 2010. Mr. Knight has been employed with the Company since December 1994.
Mr. Mistysyn has served as Vice President – Corporate Controller since May 2010. Mr. Mistysyn served as Vice President - Assistant Corporate Controller from August 2009 to May 2010 and Vice President – Controller, Paint and Coatings Division from November 2006 to August 2009. Mr. Mistysyn has been employed with the Company since June 1990.

16


PART II
 
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and traded under the symbol SHW. The number of shareholders of record at January 31, 2014 was 7,536.
Information regarding market prices and dividend information with respect to our common stock is set forth on pages  78 and 79 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference. The performance graph set forth on page  16 of our 2013 Annual Report is incorporated herein by reference. The information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s purchases of common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013 .  
Period
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per
Share
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of a
Publicly
Announced Plan
 
Maximum Number
of Shares
that May
Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plan
October 1 – October 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share repurchase program (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,650,000

November 1 – November 30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share repurchase program (a)
 
1,000,000

 
$185.60
 
1,000,000

 
12,650,000

December 1 – December 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share repurchase program (a)
 
500,000

 
$183.29
 
500,000

 
12,150,000

Employee transactions (b)
 
1,431

 
178.75
 
 
 
NA

Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share repurchase program (a)
 
1,500,000

 
$184.83
 
1,500,000

 
12,150,000

Employee transactions (b)
 
1,431

 
$178.75
 
 
 
NA

(a)
All shares were purchased through the Company’s publicly announced share repurchase program. On October 20, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the Company to purchase an additional 20,000,000 shares of its common stock. The Company had remaining authorization at December 31, 2013 to purchase 12,150,000  shares. There is no expiration date specified for the program. The Company intends to repurchase stock under the program in the future.
(b)
All shares were delivered to satisfy the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligations by employees who exercised stock options.

17


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(millions of dollars, except per common share data)
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales
 
$
10,186

 
$
9,534

 
$
8,766

 
$
7,776

 
$
7,094

 
Net income
 
753

 
631

 
442

 
462

 
436

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Position
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
6,383

 
$
6,235

 
$
5,229

 
$
5,169

 
$
4,324

 
Long-term debt
 
1,122

 
1,632

 
639

 
648

 
783

 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
 
7.4x

 
7.2x

 
6.3x

 
5.1x

 
5.6x

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Common Share Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income — basic 
 
$
7.41

 
$
6.15

 
$
4.22

 
$
4.28

 
$
3.80

 
Net income — diluted
 
7.26

 
6.02

 
4.14

 
4.21

 
3.78

 
Cash dividends
 
2.00

 
1.56

 
1.46

 
1.44

 
1.42

 
(a)
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represents income before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, net, including amortization of discount and financing costs and the portion of operating rental expense which management believes is representative of the interest component of rent expense. The following schedule includes the figures used to calculate the ratios:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
Income before income taxes
 
$
1,086

 
$
907

 
$
742

 
$
678

 
$
623

 
Fixed charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net
 
63

 
43

 
42

 
71

 
40

 
Interest component of rent expense
 
108

 
103

 
97

 
93

 
94

 
Total fixed charges
 
171

 
146

 
139

 
164

 
134

 
Earnings
 
$
1,257

 
$
1,053

 
$
881

 
$
842

 
$
757

 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information required by this item is set forth on pages  19 through 39 of our 2013 Annual Report under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk associated with interest rates, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. We occasionally utilize derivative instruments as part of our overall financial risk management policy, but do not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts during 2013 to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. There were no contracts outstanding at December 31, 2013 . Foreign currency option and forward contracts are described in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page  70 of our 2013 Annual Report. We believe we may experience continuing losses from foreign currency fluctuations. However, we do not expect currency translation, transaction or hedging contract losses to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

18


ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Information required by this item is set forth on pages  42 through 76 of our 2013 Annual Report under the captions “Report of Management on the Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Statements of Consolidated Income and Comprehensive Income,” “Consolidated Balance Sheets,” “Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows,” “Statements of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity,” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Unaudited quarterly data is set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page  72 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 and Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to our management including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The “Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” is set forth on page  40 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The “Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” is set forth on page  41 of our 2013 Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
None.

19


PART III
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors
The information regarding our directors is set forth under the captions “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” and “Experiences, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills of Directors and Nominees” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors during 2013 . Please refer to the information set forth under the caption “Board Meetings and Committees” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers
The information regarding our executive officers is set forth under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Audit Committee
The information regarding the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and the information regarding audit committee financial experts are set forth under the caption “Board Meetings and Committees” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Conduct, which applies to all directors, officers and employees of Sherwin-Williams and our subsidiaries wherever located. Our Code of Conduct contains the general guidelines and principles for conducting Sherwin-Williams' business consistent with the highest standards of business ethics. Under our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management, our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and senior financial management are responsible for creating and maintaining a culture of high ethical standards and of commitment to compliance throughout our company to ensure the fair and timely reporting of Sherwin-Williams' financial results and condition. Senior financial management includes the controller, the treasurer, the principal financial/accounting personnel in our operating groups and divisions, and all other financial/accounting personnel within our corporate departments and operating groups and divisions with staff supervision responsibilities. Please refer to the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance – Code of Conduct” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Our Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management are available in the “Corporate Governance” section on the “Investor Relations” page of our website at www.sherwin.com.
We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Management that applies to our directors and executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or any persons performing similar functions, and that is required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is set forth under the captions “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Risk Assessment,” “ 2013 Director Compensation Table” and “Director Compensation Program” in our Proxy Statement, and under the Executive Compensation section of our Proxy Statement commencing with the information under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and continuing through the information under the caption “Estimated Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

20


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth under the captions “Security Ownership of Management” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.  
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Transactions with Related Persons,” and “Independence of Directors” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is set forth under the caption “Matters Relating to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

21


PART IV
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1)
Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company included in our 2013 Annual Report are incorporated by reference in Item 8.
(i)
Report of Management on the Consolidated Financial Statements (page  42 of our 2013 Annual Report);
(ii)
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements (page  43 of our 2013 Annual Report);
(iii)
Statements of Consolidated Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 (page  44 of our 2013 Annual Report);
(iv)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 (page  45 of our 2013 Annual Report);
(v)
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 (page  46 of our 2013 Annual Report);
(vi)
Statements of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 (page  47 of our 2013 Annual Report); and
(vii)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 (pages  48 through  76 of our 2013 Annual Report).
(2)
Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 is set forth below. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
(Schedule II)
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows:  
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Beginning balance
$
47,667

 
$
51,747

 
$
59,310

Amount acquired through acquisitions
896

 
226

 
462

Bad debt expense
31,192

 
20,922

 
25,078

Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries
(25,295
)
 
(25,228
)
 
(33,103
)
Ending balance
$
54,460

 
$
47,667

 
$
51,747

 
(3)
Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index on pages  24 through 28 of this report.

22


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 27, 2014 .
 
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
 
 
By:
/ S /
C ATHERINE  M. K ILBANE
 
 
Catherine M. Kilbane, Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 27, 2014 .
* C HRISTOPHER  M. C ONNOR
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
    Christopher M. Connor
 
 
* S EAN  P. H ENNESSY
 
Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
    Sean P. Hennessy
 
 
* A LLEN  J. M ISTYSYN
 
Vice President – Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
    Allen J. Mistysyn
 
 
* A RTHUR  F. A NTON
 
Director
    Arthur F. Anton
 
 
* D AVID  F. H ODNIK
 
Director
    David F. Hodnik
 
 
* T HOMAS  G. K ADIEN
 
Director
    Thomas G. Kadien
 
 
* R ICHARD  J. K RAMER
 
Director
    Richard J. Kramer
 
* S USAN  J. K ROPF
 
Director
    Susan J. Kropf
 
 
* R ICHARD  K. S MUCKER
 
Director
    Richard K. Smucker
 
 
* J OHN  M. S TROPKI
 
Director
    John M. Stropki
 

*
The undersigned, by signing her name hereto, does sign this report on behalf of the designated officers and directors of the Company pursuant to powers of attorney executed on behalf of each such officer and director and filed as an exhibit to this report.
By:
/ S /
C ATHERINE  M K ILBANE
  
February 27, 2014
 
 
Catherine M. Kilbane, Attorney-in-fact
  
 

23




EXHIBIT INDEX
3.
(a)
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended through April 17, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(b)
Regulations of the Company, as amended and restated April 20, 2011, filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
4.
(a)
Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to Chemical Bank), as trustee, dated as of February 1, 1996, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to Form S-3 Registration Statement Number 333-01093 dated February 20, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(b)
First Supplemental Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (including Form of Note), dated as of December 21, 2009, filed as Exhibit 4(b) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(c)
Form of Second Supplemental Indenture by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (including Form of Note), dated as of December 7, 2012, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(d)
Form of Third Supplemental Indenture by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (including Form of Note), dated as of December 7, 2012, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(e)
Indenture between Sherwin-Williams Development Corporation, as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, dated June 15, 1986, filed as Exhibit 4(b) to Form S-3 Registration Statement Number 33-6626 dated June 20, 1986, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(f)
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2011, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 8, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(g)
Credit Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2012, among Sherwin-Williams Canada Inc., as borrower, the Company, as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as joint lead arranger, sole bookrunner and administrative agent, and PNC Bank National Association, as joint lead arranger and syndication agent, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(h)
First Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2013, among Sherwin-Williams Canada Inc., as borrower, the Company, as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as joint lead arranger, sole book runner and administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as joint lead arranger and syndication agent, and Royal Bank of Canada, as joint lead arranger and documentation agent, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 18, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(i)
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2012, among Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l., as borrower, the Company, as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as administrative agent and L/C issuer, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as syndication agents, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(j)
Five Year Credit Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(k)
Agreement for Letter of Credit, dated as of January 30, 2012, by and between the Company and Citibank, N.A. filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(l)
Five Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 6, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 6, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 

24


 
(m)
Five Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 2, dated as of February 13, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(n)
Five Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 3, dated as of February 27, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(o)
Five Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(p)
Agreement for Letter of Credit, dated as of April 23, 2012, by and between the Company and Citibank, N.A. filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(q)
Five Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 25, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 25, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(r)
Five Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 7, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(s)
Three Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(t)
Agreement for Letter of Credit, dated as of November 14, 2012, by and between the Company and Citibank, N.A., filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(u)
Three Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 26, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 26, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(v)
Three Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 3, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(w)
Three Year Credit Agreement Amendment No. 3, dated as of December 10, 2012, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
10.
*(a)
Summary of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(b)
Summary of Base Salary and Annual Incentive Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
*(c)
Forms of Amended and Restated Severance Agreements filed as Exhibit 10(e) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(d)
Schedule of Executive Officers who are Parties to the Amended and Restated Severance Agreements in the forms referred to in Exhibit 10(c) (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
*(e)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Savings and Pension Equalization Plan (as Amended and Restated) filed as Exhibit 10(g) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(f)
Amendment No. 1 to The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Savings and Pension Equalization Plan (as Amended and Restated) filed as Exhibit 10(h) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(g)
Amendment No. 2 to The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Savings and Pension Equalization Plan (As Amended and Restated) (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
*(h)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan (as Amended and Restated) filed as Exhibit 10(g) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 

25


 
*(i)
The Sherwin-Williams Company Director Deferred Fee Plan (1997 Amendment and Restatement), dated April 23, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(j)
2004-1 Amendment to The Sherwin-Williams Company Director Deferred Fee Plan (1997 Amendment and Restatement) filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(k)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Director Deferred Fee Plan (as Amended and Restated) filed as Exhibit 10(j) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(l)
Amendment to The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Director Deferred Fee Plan (as Amended and Restated), filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(m)
The Sherwin-Williams Company Executive Disability Income Plan filed as Exhibit 10(g) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(n)
Amendment Number One to The Sherwin-Williams Company Executive Disability Income Plan filed as Exhibit 10(l) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(o)
Summary of The Sherwin-Williams Company Revised Executive Disability Plan (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
*(p)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2008 Amended and Restated Executive Life Insurance Plan filed as Exhibit 10(m) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(q)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2003 Stock Plan, dated January 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(r)
Form of Stock Option Grant under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2003 Stock Plan filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(s)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(t)
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10(y) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(u)
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10(z) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(v)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant (Performance and Time-Based) under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 16, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(w)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10(bb) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(x)
Forms of Stock Option Award under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(y)
Forms of Stock Option Award under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(z)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant (Performance and Time-Based) under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(aa)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant (Performance and Time-Based) under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 

26


 
*(bb)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant (Performance and Time-Based) under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) filed as Exhibit 10(dd) to the Company's Annual Report on Form-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(cc)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(dd)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(ee)
Form of Restricted Stock Grant under The Sherwin-Williams 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2010, and incorporated by reference.
 
 
 
 
*(ff)
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2007 Executive Performance Bonus Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012) filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
**(gg)
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, by and among Avisep, S.A. de C.V., Bevisep, S.A. de C.V., Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V. and the Company filed as Exhibit 10(ii) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(hh)
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 24, 2013, by and among Avisep, S.A. de C.V., Bevisep, S.A. de C.V., Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V. and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
(ii)
Amendment No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 21, 2013, by and among Avisep, S.A. de C.V., Bevisep, S.A. de C.V., Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V. and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
**(jj)
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 16, 2013, by and among Avisep, S.A. de C.V., Bevisep, S.A. de C.V., Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V. and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
 
**(kk)
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 16, 2013, by and among Avisep, S.A. de C.V., Bevisep, S.A. de C.V., Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V., SWC Acquisition Corp. and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
13.
 
Our 2013 Annual Report, portions of which are incorporated herein by reference (filed herewith). With the exception of those portions of our 2013 Annual Report which are specifically incorporated by reference in this report, our 2013 Annual Report shall not be deemed “filed” as part of this report.
 
 
 
21.
 
Subsidiaries (filed herewith).
 
 
 
23.
 
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
 
 
 
24.
(a)
Powers of Attorney (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
(b)
Certified Resolution Authorizing Signature by Power of Attorney (filed herewith).
 
 
 
31.
(a)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith).
 
 
 
 
(b)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).
 
 
 
32.
(a)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (furnished herewith).
 
 
 
 
(b)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (furnished herewith).
 
 
 
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 

27


101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
**
Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Sherwin-Williams agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule upon request.



28

EXHIBIT 10(b)

SUMMARY OF BASE SALARY AND ANNUAL INCENTIVE
COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
2014 Base Salary . On February 18, 2014, the Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin-Williams”) set the 2014 base salaries of the executive officers who are expected to be named in the Summary Compensation Table of Sherwin-Williams’ 2014 Proxy Statement (the “Named Executive Officers”). The base salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2014 are as follows: Christopher M. Connor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ($1,221,987); John G. Morikis, President and Chief Operating Officer ($853,580); Sean P. Hennessy, Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer ($643,786); Robert J. Davisson, President, Paint Stores Group ($528,112); and Catherine M. Kilbane, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary ($515,008).
Annual Incentive Compensation to Be Earned in 2014 . The Compensation Committee also approved the following minimum, target and maximum cash bonus award levels, as a percent of salary, for the Named Executive Officers for 2014 under The Sherwin-Williams Company 2007 Executive Performance Bonus Plan.
    
 
 
Incentive Award as a Percentage of Base Salary
Named Executive Officer
 
Minimum
 
Target
 
Maximum
Christopher M. Connor
 
0
 
125

 
250

John G. Morikis
 
0
 
75

 
150

Sean P. Hennessy
 
0
 
75

 
150

Robert J. Davisson
 
0
 
60

 
120

Catherine M. Kilbane
 
0
 
60

 
120








EXHIBIT 10(d)


Schedule of Executive Officers who are Parties
to the Amended and Restated Severance Agreements in the Forms Filed as
Exhibit 10(e) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010




Form A of Severance Agreement

Christopher M. Connor
John G. Morikis
Sean P. Hennessy


Form B of Severance Agreement

Robert J. Davisson
George E. Heath
Thomas E. Hopkins
Timothy A. Knight
Steven J. Oberfeld
Robert J. Wells


Form C of Severance Pay Agreement

Catherine M. Kilbane
Allen J. Mistysyn





EXHIBIT 10(g)

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 2005
DEFFERED COMPENSATION SAVINGS AND PENSION EQUALIZATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated)

This Amendment No. 2 to The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Savings and Pension Equalization Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of January 1, 2013.

WITNESSETH :

WHEREAS , The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”) established the Plan effective January 1, 1991 and has subsequently amended and restated the Plan thereafter;

WHEREAS , pursuant to Article 8.1 of the Plan, the Company retains the right to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and

WHEREAS , the Company desires to amend the Plan to add a new Designated Participant that is eligible to receive benefits pursuant to Section 2.4 of the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE , the Plan is hereby amended in the respects hereinafter set forth:

1.
Exhibit A of the Plan is amended to add the following Designated Participant:

“Mark R. Henderson.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF , The Sherwin-Williams Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the 23rd day of December 2013.

                    
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
 
 
By:
/ S /
 
 
 
Catherine M. Kilbane, Sr. Vice President
 
 
General Counsel and Secretary














EXHIBIT 10(o)

Summary of
The Sherwin-Williams Company Revised Executive Disability Plan


Effective as of January 1, 2013, the Sherwin-Williams Company adopted The Sherwin-Williams Company Revised Executive Long Term Disability Plan that provides benefits in the event of a long term disability to executives who are not otherwise covered by the Sherwin-Williams Company Executive Disability Income Plan, which was frozen to new participants effective January 1, 2008. Upon a covered executive experiencing a qualifying disability, the plan will provide a benefit to the executive equal to 60% of his or her base salary, subject to a maximum monthly benefit of $35,000. Benefit payments under the plan begin after the executive has experienced a qualifying disability for 180 days. Benefit payments cease at the earliest of the executive reaching the Social Security normal retirement age (or, if age 60 or older at the time of disability, a period of 12-60 months depending on the executive’s age), the executive’s recovery from the disability, or the executive’s death. The premium for coverage provided by the plan is company-paid.




Exhibit 13 2





































































































































FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

 
FINANCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Financial Summary
 
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
 
Reports of Management and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
 
 
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
 
 
Shareholder Information
 
 
Corporate Officers and Operating Management

17


FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(millions of dollars except as noted and per share data)


 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales
$
10,186

 
$
9,534

 
$
8,766

 
$
7,776

 
$
7,094

Cost of goods sold
5,569

 
5,328

 
5,021

 
4,295

 
3,831

Selling, general and administrative expenses
3,468

 
3,260

 
2,961

 
2,728

 
2,535

Impairments and dissolution
 
 
4

 
5

 
4

 
36

Interest expense
63

 
43

 
42

 
71

 
40

Income before income taxes
1,086

 
907

 
742

 
678

 
623

Net income
753

 
631

 
442

 
462

 
436

Financial Position
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable - net
$
1,098

 
$
1,033

 
$
990

 
$
917

 
$
696

Inventories
971

 
920

 
927

 
918

 
738

Working capital - net
630

 
1,273

 
99

 
150

 
376

Property, plant and equipment - net
1,021

 
966

 
957

 
952

 
819

Total assets
6,383

 
6,235

 
5,229

 
5,169

 
4,324

Long-term debt
1,122

 
1,632

 
639

 
648

 
783

Total debt
1,722

 
1,705

 
993

 
1,045

 
818

Shareholders’ equity
1,775

 
1,792

 
1,517

 
1,609

 
1,491

Per Common Share Information
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average shares outstanding (thousands)
100,898

 
101,715

 
103,471

 
107,022

 
113,514

Book value
$
17.72

 
$
17.35

 
$
14.61

 
$
15.04

 
$
13.62

Net income - diluted (1) 
7.26

 
6.02

 
4.14

 
4.21

 
3.78

Net income - basic (1) 
7.41

 
6.15

 
4.22

 
4.28

 
3.80

Cash dividends
2.00

 
1.56

 
1.46

 
1.44

 
1.42

Financial Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Return on sales
7.4
%
 
6.6
%
 
5.0
%
 
5.9
%
 
6.1
%
Asset turnover
1.6
x
 
1.5
x
 
1.7
x
 
1.5
x
 
1.6
x
Return on assets
11.8
%
 
10.1
%
 
8.4
%
 
8.9
%
 
10.1
%
Return on equity (2) 
42.0
%
 
41.6
%
 
27.5
%
 
31.0
%
 
27.1
%
Dividend payout ratio (3)
33.2
%
 
37.7
%
 
34.7
%
 
38.1
%
 
35.5
%
Total debt to capitalization
49.2
%
 
48.8
%
 
39.6
%
 
39.4
%
 
35.4
%
Current ratio
1.2

 
1.7

 
1.0

 
1.1

 
1.3

Interest coverage (4) 
18.3
x
 
22.2
x
 
18.4
x
 
10.6
x
 
16.6
x
Net working capital to sales
6.2
%
 
13.3
%
 
1.1
%
 
1.9
%
 
5.3
%
Effective income tax rate (5)
30.7
%
 
30.4
%
 
40.4
%
 
31.8
%
 
30.0
%
General
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
$
167

 
$
157

 
$
154

 
$
125

 
$
91

Total technical expenditures (6) 
144

 
140

 
130

 
103

 
102

Advertising expenditures
263

 
247

 
227

 
218

 
218

Repairs and maintenance
87

 
83

 
78

 
76

 
69

Depreciation
159

 
152

 
151

 
140

 
145

Amortization of intangible assets
29

 
27

 
30

 
35

 
26

Shareholders of record (total count)
7,555

 
7,954

 
8,360

 
8,706

 
9,151

Number of employees (total count)
37,633

 
34,154

 
32,988

 
32,228

 
29,220

Sales per employee (thousands of dollars)
$
271

 
$
279

 
$
266

 
$
241

 
$
243

Sales per dollar of assets
1.60

 
1.53

 
1.68

 
1.50

 
1.64

(1)
All earnings per share amounts are presented using the two-class method. See Note 15 .
(2)
Based on net income and shareholders’ equity at beginning of year.
(3)
Based on cash dividends per common share and prior year’s diluted net income per common share.
(4)
Ratio of income before income taxes and interest expense to interest expense.
(5)
Based on income before income taxes.
(6)
See Note 1 , page 50 of this report, for a description of technical expenditures.

18  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SUMMARY
The Sherwin-Williams Company, founded in 1866, and its consolidated wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia. The Company is structured into four reportable segments – Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (collectively, the “Reportable Segments”) – and an Administrative Segment in the same way it is internally organized for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. See pages 6 through 15 of this report and Note 18 , on pages 73 through 76 of this report, for more information concerning the Reportable Segments.
The Company’s financial condition and liquidity remained strong in 2013 and net operating cash improved primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores, Consumer, and Global Finishes Groups. Net working capital decreased $642.6 million at December 31, 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to a significant increase in current liabilities while current assets increased only slightly. Current portion of long-term debt increased $499.3 million resulting primarily from the 3.125% Senior Notes becoming due in 2014. The Company has been able to arrange sufficient short-term borrowing capacity at reasonable rates, and the Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. Net operating cash increased $195.9 million to $1.08 billion in 2013 , which included a first quarter payment of $80.0 million to the Company's employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) relating to a settlement reached with the U.S. Department of Labor that was recorded in 2012 (the "DOL Settlement"), from $887.9 million in 2012 , which included a first quarter payment of $59.1 million relating to a settlement reached in the fourth quarter of 2011 with the Internal Revenue Service. Strong net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, acquire businesses, pay down debt, maintain financial stability and return cash to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases.
Results of operations for the Company were strong and improved in many areas in 2013 , primarily due to an improving domestic architectural paint market. Consolidated net sales increased 6.8 percent in 2013 to $10.19 billion from $9.53 billion in 2012 due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores Group and acquisitions. Acquisitions increased consolidated net sales 1.8 percent in 2013 . Gross profit as a percent of consolidated net sales increased to 45.3 percent in 2013 from 44.1 percent in 2012 due primarily to increased paint sales volume, improved operating efficiency and selling price increases partially offset by dilution from acquisitions and charges relating to the Brazil government tax assessments. Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased $208.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to new stores, increased service expenses to support higher sales levels and maintain customer service, and acquisitions partially offset by the DOL Settlement and foreign currency translation rate fluctuations. See "DOL leveraged ESOP settlement" on page 34
 
and Note 9 on page 66 . SG&A decreased as a percent of consolidated net sales to 34.0 percent in 2013 as compared to 34.2 percent in 2012 due primarily higher sales levels and the DOL Settlement partially offset by acquisitions. There were no trademark impairment charges in 2013 . Impairments of trademarks were $4.1 million in 2012 . Higher debt levels throughout 2013 and a one-time interest expense charge of $3.2 million from early retirement of debt during the fourth quarter resulted in increased interest expense of $19.9 million in 2013 . The effective income tax rate was 30.7 percent for 2013 and 30.4 percent for 2012 . Diluted net income per common share increased 20.6 percent to $7.26 per share for 2013 , which included charges relating to the Brazil government tax assessments ( $.21 per share), from $6.02 per share a year ago, which included charges relating to the DOL Settlement ( $.47 per share).
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report are the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements contain certain amounts that were based upon management’s best estimates, judgments and assumptions. Management utilized certain outside economic sources of information when developing the bases for their estimates and assumptions. Management used assumptions based on historical results, considering the current economic trends, and other assumptions to form the basis for determining appropriate carrying values of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Also, materially different amounts may result under materially different conditions, materially different economic trends or from using materially different assumptions. However, management believes that any materially different amounts resulting from materially different conditions or material changes in facts or circumstances are unlikely to significantly impact the current valuation of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources.


19

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

All of the significant accounting policies that were followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 1 , on pages 48 through 51 , of this report. The following procedures and assumptions utilized by management directly impacted many of the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
Non-Traded Investments
The Company has invested in the U. S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets. These investments have been identified as variable interest entities. However, the Company is not the primary beneficiary and did not consolidate the operations of the investments. The carrying amounts of these non-traded investments, which approximate market value, were determined based on cost less related income tax credits determined by the effective yield method. The Company’s risk of loss from these non-traded investments is limited to the amount of its contributed capital. The Company has no ongoing capital commitments, loan requirements or guarantees with the general partners that would require any future cash contributions other than the contractually committed capital contributions that are disclosed in the contractual obligations table on page 29 of this report. See Note 1 , on page 48 of this report, for more information on non-traded investments.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and were based on management’s best judgment and assessment, including an analysis of historical bad debts, a review of the aging of Accounts receivable and a review of the current creditworthiness of customers. Management recorded allowances for such accounts which were believed to be uncollectible, including amounts for the resolution of potential credit and other collection issues such as disputed invoices, customer satisfaction claims and pricing discrepancies. However, depending on how such potential issues are resolved, or if the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate and their ability to make required payments became impaired, increases in these allowances may be required. At December 31, 2013 , no individual customer constituted more than 5 percent of Accounts receivable.
Inventories
Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method based on inventory quantities and costs determined during the fourth quarter. Inventory quantities were adjusted during the fourth quarter as a result of annual physical inventory counts taken at all locations. If inventories accounted for on the LIFO method are reduced on a year-over-year basis, liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years occurs. Management recorded the best estimate of net realizable value for obsolete and discontinued inventories based on historical experience and current trends through reductions to inventory cost by recording a provision included in Cost of goods sold. Where management estimated that the reasonable
 
market value was below cost or determined that future demand was lower than current inventory levels, based on historical experience, current and projected market demand, current and projected volume trends and other relevant current and projected factors associated with the current economic conditions, a reduction in inventory cost to estimated net realizable value was made. See Note 3 , on page 52 of this report, for more information regarding the impact of the LIFO inventory valuation.
Purchase Accounting, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC, the Company used the purchase method of accounting to allocate costs of acquired businesses to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess costs of acquired businesses over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized as Goodwill. The valuations of the acquired assets and liabilities will impact the determination of future operating results. In addition to using management estimates and negotiated amounts, the Company used a variety of information sources to determine the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities including: third-party appraisals for the estimated value and lives of identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; third-party actuaries for the estimated obligations of defined benefit pension plans and similar benefit obligations; and legal counsel or other experts to assess the obligations associated with legal, environmental and other contingent liabilities. The business and technical judgment of management was used in determining which intangible assets have indefinite lives and in determining the useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.
As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performs impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairment has more likely than not occurred. The optional qualitative assessment, which allows companies to skip the annual two-step quantitative test if it is not more likely


20  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

than not that impairment has occurred, is performed when deemed appropriate.
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment per the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC or one level below the operating segment (component level) as determined by the availability of discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by operating segment management or an aggregate of component levels of an operating segment having similar economic characteristics. At the time of goodwill impairment testing (if performing a quantitative assessment), management determines fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow valuation model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. The use of a discounted cash flow valuation model to determine estimated fair value is common practice in impairment testing. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model for impairment testing include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates are set by using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) methodology. The WACC methodology considers market and industry data as well as Company-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining the appropriate discount rates to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a business. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates, sales projections and cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. As an indicator that each reporting unit has been valued appropriately through the use of the discounted cash flow valuation model, the aggregate of all reporting units fair value is reconciled to the total market capitalization of the Company.
The Company performed the optional qualitative assessment for its 2013 and 2012 goodwill impairment test for each of its reporting units. The 2011 goodwill impairment test, in which the fair values of each of the reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than ten percent, served as the starting point. Management identified future projected net income, return on average net assets employed and discount rate as the most relevant drivers affecting the fair value calculations. A budget-to-actual analysis was performed in which each reporting unit's key metrics were compared against budgeted amounts in order to assess the validity of future projected net income used in prior year analyses. Management evaluated whether there were any capital investment or working capital deviations from budget that would significantly affect return on average net assets employed. Management considered how the discount rates used in the fair value calculation would have changed since the 2011 goodwill impairment test and performed a sensitivity analysis, noting that it would require a discount rate significantly higher than what would be expected in order for any reporting unit to have a fair value not more than 10% in
 
excess of its carrying value. Management also analyzed macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance of the Company, entity-specific events and reporting unit-specific events. Based on the results of the qualitative assessment, management determined that it was not more likely than not that any of the reporting units were impaired and did not need to perform a quantitative test for any of the reporting units.
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at the asset level, as determined by appropriate asset valuations at acquisition. Management utilizes the royalty savings method and valuation model to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset or trademark. In this method, management estimates the royalty savings arising from the ownership of the intangible asset. The key assumptions used in estimating the royalty savings for impairment testing include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates used are similar to the rates developed by the WACC methodology considering any differences in Company-specific risk factors between reporting units and trademarks. Royalty rates are established by management and valuation experts and periodically substantiated by valuation experts. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections for each significant trademark. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. The royalty savings valuation methodology and calculations used in 2013 impairment testing are consistent with prior years.
The discounted cash flow and royalty savings valuation methodologies require management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuations are performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value considering the current economic conditions. See Notes 2 and 4 , on pages 51 through 53 of this report, for a discussion of businesses acquired, the estimated fair


21

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

values of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets recorded at acquisition date and reductions in carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded as a result of impairment tests in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Property, plant and equipment was stated on the basis of cost and depreciated principally on a straight-line basis using industry standards and historical experience to estimate useful lives. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, if events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life had changed, impairment tests were performed or the useful life was adjusted. Undiscounted future cash flows were used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets were impaired. Where impairment was identified, management determined fair values for assets using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. Growth models were developed using both industry and company historical results and forecasts. If the usefulness of an asset was determined to be impaired, management estimated a new useful life based on the period of time for projected uses of the asset. Such models and changes in useful life required management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuation or determination was performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value or useful life considering the current economic conditions. All tested long-lived assets or groups of long-lived assets had undiscounted cash flows that were substantially in excess of their carrying value, except as noted in Note 4 . See Notes 4 and 5 , on pages 52 through 55 of this report, for a discussion of the reductions in carrying value or useful life of long-lived assets in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC.
Exit or Disposal Activities
Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC and property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational, include amounts estimated by management and primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated. If impairment of property, plant and equipment exists, the carrying value is reduced to fair value estimated by management. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. See Note 5 , on pages 53 through 55 of this report, for information concerning
 
impairment of property, plant and equipment and accrued qualified exit costs.
Other Liabilities
The Company is self-insured for certain liabilities, primarily worker’s compensation claims, employee medical benefits, and automobile, property, general and product liability claims. Estimated amounts were accrued for certain worker’s compensation, employee medical and disability benefits, automobile and property claims filed but unsettled and estimated claims incurred but not reported based upon management’s estimated aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience, actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and actuarially-developed models for estimating certain liabilities. Certain estimated general and product liability claims filed but unsettled were accrued based on management’s best estimate of ultimate settlement or actuarial calculations of potential liability using industry experience and actuarial assumptions developed for similar types of claims.
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
To determine the Company’s ultimate obligation under its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions, management must estimate the future cost of benefits and attribute that cost to the time period during which each covered employee works. To determine the obligations of such benefit plans, management uses actuaries to calculate such amounts using key assumptions such as discount rates, inflation, long-term investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, rate of compensation increases and medical and prescription drug costs. Management reviews all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis to ensure that the most current information available is being considered. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes each plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. Actuarial gains and losses and prior


22  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

service costs are recognized and recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension and net periodic benefit costs.
Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised. Prior to July 1, 2009, the contribution was based on six percent of compensation for certain covered employees. Under the revised plan, such participants are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula.
A reduction in the over-funded status of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2008 due to the decrease in market value of equity securities held by the plans increased the future amortization of actuarial losses recognized in Cumulative comprehensive loss. This amortization increased net pension costs in 2011 , 2012 , and 2013 . An increase in market value of equity securities held by the plans during 2011 , 2012 and 2013 will decrease the future amortization of actuarial losses recognized in Cumulative comprehensive loss. The excess in market value of equity securities held by the plans versus the expected returns in 2013 will decrease the future amortization of actuarial losses. The amortization of actuarial losses on plan assets and an increase in discount rates on projected benefit obligations, will decrease net pension costs in 2014 . See Note 6 , on pages 56 through 61 of this report, for information concerning the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions.
Debt
The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded long-term debt were based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded long-term debt were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. See Note 1 , on page 48 of this report, for the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, and Note 7 , on pages 61 and 62 of this report, for a description of the Company’s long-term debt arrangements.
Environmental Matters
The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrues for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation and indirect costs such as compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, actuarial, consulting and law firms. Due to uncertainties surrounding environmental investigations and remediation activities, the
 
Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. See pages 27 through 29 and Note 8 , on pages 62 and 63 of this report, for information concerning the accrual for extended environmental-related activities and a discussion concerning unaccrued future loss contingencies.
Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities
In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial and contractual claims. Management believes that the Company has properly accrued for all known liabilities that existed and those where a loss was deemed probable for which a fair value was available or an amount could be reasonably estimated in accordance with all present U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, because litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties and the ultimate result of any present or future litigation is unpredictable, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties involved, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. See pages 31 through 34 of this report and Note 9 , on pages 63 through 66 of this report, for information concerning litigation.
In addition, the Company may be subject to potential liabilities for which a loss was not deemed probable at this time and an amount could not be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties involved. See page 31 of this report for more information concerning contingent liabilities.
Income Taxes
The Company estimated income taxes in each jurisdiction that it operated. This involved estimating taxable earnings, specific taxable and deductible items, the likelihood of generating sufficient future taxable income to utilize deferred


23

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

tax assets and possible exposures related to future tax audits. To the extent these estimates change, adjustments to deferred and accrued income taxes will be made in the period in which the changes occur.
In October 2011, the Company reached a settlement of the IRS’ audit of the Company’s employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). The Company has fully resolved all IRS issues for the 2003 through 2009 tax years relating to the matters challenging the ESOP related federal income tax deductions claimed by the Company and proposing substantial excise taxes and penalties. The IRS Settlement (including interest), which resolved all ESOP related tax issues, resulted in an after-tax charge related to federal and state income taxes totaling approximately $75.0 million, or $.70 per diluted common share, and an additional reduction in Shareholders’ equity of approximately $51.2 million in the Company’s fourth quarter of 2011. The Company paid $60.0 million of the IRS Settlement to the IRS during 2011 and made a final payment of approximately $59.1 million in the first quarter of 2012. The Company has fully resolved all IRS issues relating to the matters challenging the ESOP related federal income tax deductions claimed by the Company.
See Note 14 , on pages 70 through 71 of this report, for information concerning the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties and current and deferred tax expense.
Stock-Based Compensation
The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The Company follows the “modified prospective” method as described in the Topic whereby compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted after December 31, 2005.
The Company estimates the fair value of option rights using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model which requires management to make estimates for certain assumptions. Management and a consultant continuously review the following significant assumptions: risk-free interest rate, expected life of options, expected volatility of stock and expected dividend yield of stock. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations. See Note 12 , on pages 68 and 69 of this report, for more information on stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue was primarily generated from the sale of products. All sales of products were recognized when shipped and title had passed to unaffiliated customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue is reasonably assured at time of sale. Discounts were recorded as a reduction to sales in the same period as the sale resulting in an appropriate net sales amount for the period. Standard sales terms are final and returns or exchanges are not permitted unless expressly stated. Estimated provisions for returns or exchanges, recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales, were established in cases where the right of return existed. The Company offered a variety
 
of programs, primarily to its retail customers, designed to promote sales of its products. Such programs required periodic payments and allowances based on estimated results of specific programs and were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales. The Company accrued the estimated total payments and allowances associated with each transaction at the time of sale. Additionally, the Company offered programs directly to consumers to promote the sale of its products. Promotions that reduced the ultimate consumer sale prices were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales at the time the promotional offer was made, generally using estimated redemption and participation levels. The Company continually assesses the adequacy of accruals for customer and consumer promotional program costs earned but not yet paid. To the extent total program payments differ from estimates, adjustments may be necessary. Historically, these total program payments and adjustments have not been material.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOW
Overview
The Company’s financial condition and liquidity remained strong in 2013 and net operating cash improved primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores, Consumer, and Global Finishes Groups. Net working capital decreased $642.6 million at December 31, 2013 compared to 2012 due primarily to a significant increase in current liabilities while current assets increased only slightly. Current portion of long-term debt increased $499.3 million resulting from the 3.125% Senior Notes becoming due in 2014. Accounts payable increased $75.5 million , Accrued taxes increased $27.4 million , and Short-term borrowings increased $27.5 million while all other current liabilities, excluding current portion of long-term debt, increased $22.5 million . Accounts receivable were up $65.2 million and Inventories were up $50.5 million while Cash and cash equivalents decreased $117.7 million . Deferred tax net assets were down $22.2 million while the remaining current assets increased $33.7 million . The Company’s current ratio decreased to 1.25 at December 31, 2013 from 1.68 at December 31, 2012 . Total debt at December 31, 2013 increased $17.0 million to $1.72 billion from $1.70 billion at December 31, 2012 . Total debt increased as a percentage of total capitalization to 49.2 percent from 48.8 percent at the end of 2012 . At December 31, 2013 , the Company had remaining borrowing ability of $2.28 billion .


24  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net operating cash increased $195.9 million to $1.08 billion in 2013 from $887.9 million in 2012 due primarily to an increase in net income of $121.5 million and an overall net reduction in working capital accounts. Net operating cash increased as a percent to sales to 10.6 percent in 2013 compared to 9.3 percent in 2012 . Strong Net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, acquire businesses, and return cash to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases. In 2013 , the Company used Net operating cash to invest $166.7 million in capital additions and improvements, purchase $769.3 million in treasury stock, pay $205.0 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock, and invest $79.9 million in acquisitions.
Net Working Capital
Total current assets less Total current liabilities (net working capital) decreased $642.6 million to a surplus of $630.2 million at December 31, 2013 from a surplus of $1.27 billion at December 31, 2012 . The net working capital decrease is due primarily to a large increase in current liabilities while current assets increased only slightly. Current portion of long-term debt increased $499.3 million resulting from the 3.125% Senior Notes becoming due in 2014. Accounts payable increased $75.5 million , Accrued taxes increased $27.4 million , and Short-term borrowings increased $27.5 million while all other current liabilities, excluding current portion of long-term debt, increased $22.5 million . Accounts receivable were up $65.2 million and Inventories were up $50.5 million while Cash and cash equivalents decreased $117.7 million . Deferred tax net assets were down $22.2 million while the remaining current assets increased $33.7 million . The Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. The increase in Total current liabilities caused the Company’s current ratio to decrease to 1.25 at December 31, 2013 from 1.68 at December 31, 2012 . Accounts receivable as a percent of Net sales was flat at 10.8 percent in 2013 and 2012 . Accounts receivable days outstanding decreased to 54 days in 2013 from 55 days 2012 . In 2013 , provisions for allowance for doubtful collection of accounts increased $6.8 million , or 14.2 percent . Inventories decreased as a percent of Net sales to 9.5 percent in 2013 from 9.7 percent in 2012 due primarily to tighter inventory management. Inventory days outstanding decreased to 86 days in 2013 from 90 days in 2012 . Accounts payable increased in 2013 to $998.5 million compared to $923.0 million last year due primarily to increased purchases to service higher sales levels and timing of payments.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in purchase business combinations, increased $22.7 million in 2013 due primarily to $19.8 million additional goodwill resulting from acquisitions.
 
Intangible assets decreased $34.3 million in 2013 . Decreases from amortization of finite-lived intangible assets of $29.0 million and adjustments to acquired finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets within the last twelve months of $12.5 million were partially offset by $10.2 million of capitalized software costs. Acquired finite-lived intangible assets included assets such as covenants not to compete, customer lists and product formulations. Costs related to designing, developing, obtaining and implementing internal use software are capitalized and amortized in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC. See Notes 2 and 4 , on pages 51 through 53 of this report, for a description of acquired goodwill, identifiable intangible assets and asset impairments recorded in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC and summaries of the remaining carrying values of goodwill and intangible assets.
Deferred Pension and Other Assets
Deferred pension assets of $302.4 million at December 31, 2013 represent the excess of the fair value of assets over the actuarially determined projected benefit obligations, primarily of the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan. The increase in Deferred pension assets during 2013 of $52.5 million , from $249.9 million last year, was due primarily to an increase in the fair value of equity securities held by the salaried defined benefit pension plan and decreased projected benefit obligations resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions partially offset by net pension liabilities merged into the plan from acquisition of businesses and other insignificant items. In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the increase in the value of the Deferred pension assets is offset in Cumulative other comprehensive loss and is amortized as a component of Net pension costs over a defined period of pension service. See Note 6 , on pages 56 through 61 of this report, for more information concerning the excess fair value of assets over projected benefit obligations of the salaried defined benefit pension plan and the amortization of actuarial gains or losses relating to changes in the excess assets and other actuarial assumptions.
Other assets increased $41.8 million to $408.0 million at December 31, 2013 due primarily to increases in other investments. 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Net property, plant and equipment increased $55.5 million to $1.02 billion at December 31, 2013 due primarily to capital expenditures of $166.7 million and acquired assets of $53.4 million partially offset by depreciation expense of $158.8 million ,


25

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

sale or disposition of assets with remaining net book value of $4.5 million and currency translation adjustments of $1.4 million . Capital expenditures during 2013 in the Paint Stores Group were primarily attributable to the opening of new paint stores and improvements in existing stores. In the Consumer Group, capital expenditures during 2013 were primarily related to efficiency improvements and maintenance items in existing production and distribution facilities. Capital expenditures in the Global Finishes Group were primarily attributable to improvements in existing manufacturing and distribution facilities. Capital expenditures in the Latin America Coatings Group were primarily attributable to the opening of new specialty stores and improvements in existing manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Administrative segment incurred capital expenditures primarily for headquarters building and information systems hardware. In 2014 , the Company expects to spend more than 2013 for capital expenditures. The predominant share of the capital expenditures in 2014 is expected to be for various productivity improvement and maintenance projects at existing manufacturing and distribution facilities, new store openings and new or upgraded information systems hardware. The Company does not anticipate the need for any specific long-term external financing to support these capital expenditures.
Debt
There were no borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Borrowings outstanding under this program at December 31, 2011 were $264.9 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 0.2 percent . Borrowings outstanding under various foreign programs at December 31, 2013 were $96.6 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 7.8 percent . At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 , foreign borrowings were $69.0 million and $81.4 million with weighted-average interest rates of 2.8 percent and 4.9 percent , respectively. Long-term debt, including the current portion, decreased $10.5 million during 2013 due primarily to the retirement of $9.7 million of the Company's 30-year 7.375% bonds due 2027. On December 4, 2012, Senior Notes were issued totaling $1.00 billion . These Senior Notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 16, 2009. The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes were used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of short-term borrowings and financing acquisitions.
On September 19, 2012, Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a €95.0 million (Euro) five -year revolving credit facility. This facility replaced the existing €97.0 million (Euro) credit facility. On June 29, 2012, Sherwin-Williams Canada Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a new CAD 75.0 million five -year credit facility which replaced the existing credit facility. On March 18, 2013, the aggregate amount of this credit facility was increased to CAD 150.0 million . These credit facilities are being used for general corporate purposes, including refinancing indebtedness and for acquisitions.
On January 30, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the
 
issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit of up to an aggregate availability of $500.0 million . On April 23, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250.0 million . On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250.0 million . The three credit agreements entered into in 2012 replace prior credit facilities that matured in 2012 and 2011. At December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , there were no borrowings outstanding under any of these credit agreements.
The Company uses a revolving credit agreement primarily to satisfy its commercial paper program’s dollar for dollar liquidity requirement. On July 8, 2011, the Company entered into a new five-year $1.05 billion revolving credit agreement, which replaced the existing three-year $500.0 million credit agreement. The new credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one-year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to $1.30 billion , both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender.
See Note 7 , on pages 61 and 62 of this report, for a detailed description of the Company’s debt outstanding and other available financing programs.
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company’s total liability for unfunded or underfunded defined benefit pension plans increased $12.1 million to $52.1 million primarily due to the acquisition of three Canadian defined benefit pension plans in connection with the 2013 acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex as well as changes in the actuarial assumptions of the Company's foreign plans. Postretirement benefits other than pensions decreased $51.5 million to $286.7 million at December 31, 2013 due primarily to changes in the actuarial assumptions.


26  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised. Prior to July 1, 2009, the contribution was based on six percent of compensation for covered employees. Under the revised plan, such participants are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Amounts previously recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss in accordance with the provisions of the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC were modified in 2009 resulting in a decrease in comprehensive loss due primarily to the change in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan and an increase in the excess plan assets over the actuarially calculated projected benefit obligation in the domestic defined benefit pension plans. Partially offsetting this decreased loss were modifications to actuarial assumptions used to calculate projected benefit obligations.
Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan.
The assumed discount rate used to determine the actuarial present value of projected defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit obligations for domestic plans was increased from 3.73 percent to 4.65 percent at December 31, 2013 due to increased rates of high-quality, long-term investments and was slightly higher for foreign defined benefit pension plans. The rate of compensation increases used to determine the projected benefit obligations remained at 4.0 percent for domestic pension plans and was slightly higher on most foreign plans. In deciding on the rate of compensation increases, management considered historical Company increases as well as expectations for future increases. The expected long-term rate of return on assets was decreased to 6.0 percent for 2013 for domestic pension plans and was slightly lower for most foreign plans. In establishing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for 2013 , management considered the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation for future investment strategies. The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the net periodic benefit cost of postretirement benefits other than pensions for 2013 were 8.0 percent for medical and prescription drug cost increases, both decreasing gradually to 5.0 percent in 2022 . The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2013 were between 6.5 percent and 7.5 percent for medical and prescription drug cost increases. In developing the assumed health care cost trend rates, management considered industry data, historical Company experience and expectations for future health care costs.
For 2014 Net pension cost and Net periodic benefit cost recognition for domestic plans, the Company will use a discount rate of 4.65 percent , an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 6.0 percent, a rate of compensation increase of 4.0 percent and cost trend rates between 6.5 percent and 7.5 percent for health care and prescription drug cost increases. Slightly higher discount rates and rates of compensation increases and lower expected long-term rates of return on plan assets will be used for most foreign plans. Use of these assumptions and amortization of actuarial gains will result in a domestic Net
 
pension cost in 2014 that is expected to be approximately $13.8 million lower than in 2013 and a Net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits other than pensions that is expected to decrease $4.1 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . See Note 6 , on pages 56 through 61 of this report, for more information on the Company’s obligations and funded status of its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefits other than pensions.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities increased $74.1 million during 2013 due primarily to an increase in non-current deferred tax liabilities of $73.5 million , an increase in long-term pension liabilities of $3.0 million and an increase in deferred compensation liabilities of $1.7 million , partially offset by a decrease in accruals for extended environmental-related liabilities of $10.6 million and a decrease in long-term commitments related to the affordable housing and historic renovation real estate properties of $5.4 million . See below and Note 8 , on pages 62 and 63 of this report, for further information on environmental-related long-term liabilities.
Environmental-Related Liabilities
The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in the same industry, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance. 
Depreciation of capital expenditures and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company’s capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were not material to the Company’s financial


27

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations during 2013 . Management does not expect that such capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses will be material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations in 2014 .
The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites (including sites which were previously owned and/or operated by businesses acquired by the Company). In addition, the Company, together with other parties, has been designated a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental protection laws for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination and hazardous waste at a number of third-party sites, primarily Superfund sites. In general, these laws provide that potentially responsible parties may be held jointly and severally liable for investigation and remediation costs regardless of fault. The Company may be similarly designated with respect to additional third-party sites in the future.
The Company accrues for estimated costs of investigation and remediation activities at its currently or formerly owned sites and third-party sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are determined based on currently available facts regarding each site. The Company accrues a specific estimated amount when such an amount and a time frame in which the costs will be incurred can be reasonably determined. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is accrued by the Company in accordance with applicable accounting rules and interpretations. The Company continuously assesses its potential liability for investigation and remediation activities and adjusts its environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the Company had total current and long-term accruals for environmental-related activities of $102.0 million , $114.3 million and $132.1 million , respectively.
Due to the uncertainties of the scope and magnitude of contamination and the degree of investigation and remediation activities that may be necessary at certain currently or formerly owned sites and third-party sites, it is reasonably likely that further extensive investigations may be required and that extensive remedial actions may be necessary not only on such sites, but on adjacent properties. Depending on the extent of the additional investigations and remedial actions necessary, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. If the Company’s future loss contingency is ultimately determined to be at the maximum of the range of possible outcomes for every site for which costs can be reasonably estimated, the Company’s aggregate accruals for environmental-related activities would be $87.1 million higher than the accruals at December 31, 2013 .
 
Two of the Company’s formerly owned sites, described below, account for the majority of the accruals for environmental-related activities and the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . At December 31, 2013 , $56.9 million , or 55.9 percent , of the total accrual for environmental-related activities related directly to these two sites. Of the aggregate unaccrued exposure at December 31, 2013 , $59.2 million , or 68.0 percent , related to the two manufacturing sites. While environmental investigations and remedial actions are in different stages at these sites, additional investigations, remedial actions and/or monitoring will likely be required at each site.
Both of the sites are formerly owned manufacturing facilities in New Jersey that are in various stages of the environmental-related process. At the first site, extensive soil remediation was conducted on-site and completed in 2010 under an agency approved work plan. A small portion of soil remediation remains to be conducted on-site as well as some additional determination of possible off-site soil impacts. Investigation of the area groundwater continues to determine the degree and extent of contamination, both on-site and off-site. Although contamination determined to be associated with historical operations of the Company exists at the second site and adjacent areas, the extent and magnitude of the contamination has not yet been fully quantified. A final remedial action plan has not yet been formulated and clean up goals have not been approved by the lead governmental agency. It is reasonably likely that further extensive investigations may be required or that extensive remedial actions may be necessary at this formerly owned site, in adjacent areas or along adjacent waterways. At both sites, depending on the extent of the additional remedial actions necessary, the ultimate liability for these sites may exceed the amounts currently accrued and the maximum of the ranges of reasonably possible outcomes currently estimated by management.
Management cannot presently estimate the ultimate potential loss contingencies related to these two sites or other less significant sites until such time as a substantial portion of the investigative activities at each site is completed and remedial action plans are developed.
In accordance with the Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Topic of the ASC, the Company has identified certain conditional asset retirement obligations at various current manufacturing, distribution and store facilities. These obligations relate primarily to asbestos abatement and


28  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

closures of hazardous waste containment devices. Using investigative, remediation and disposal methods that are currently available to the Company, the estimated cost of these obligations is not significant.
In the event any future loss contingency significantly exceeds the current amount accrued, the recording of the ultimate liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the additional costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its environmental-related matters or conditional asset retirement obligations will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time during which environmental investigation and remediation takes place. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
 
Management expects these contingent environmental-related liabilities and conditional asset retirement obligations to be resolved over an extended period of time. Management is unable to provide a more specific time frame due to the indefinite amount of time to conduct investigation activities at any site, the indefinite amount of time to obtain governmental agency approval, as necessary, with respect to investigation and remediation activities, and the indefinite amount of time necessary to conduct remediation activities.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The Company has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The following table summarizes such obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2013 :

(thousands of dollars)
 
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
 
Total
 
Less than
1 Year
 
1–3 Years
 
3–5 Years
 
More than
5 Years
Long-term debt
 
$
1,627,581

 
$
502,991

 
$
572

 
$
700,303

 
$
423,715

Operating leases
 
1,220,132

 
277,599

 
441,829

 
256,632

 
244,072

Short-term borrowings
 
96,551

 
96,551

 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest on Long-term debt
 
543,621

 
46,409

 
62,519

 
53,053

 
381,640

Purchase obligations (a)
 
129,746

 
129,746

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other contractual obligations (b)
 
344,800

 
137,080

 
94,474

 
45,825

 
67,421

Total contractual cash obligations
 
$
3,962,431

 
$
1,190,376

 
$
599,394

 
$
1,055,813

 
$
1,116,848

(a)  
Relate to open purchase orders for raw materials at December 31, 2013 .
(b)  
Relate primarily to estimated future capital contributions to investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate partnerships and various other contractual obligations.
 
 
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Commercial Commitments
 
Total
 
Less than
1 Year
 
1–3 Years
 
3–5 Years
 
More than
5 Years
Standby letters of credit
 
$
25,896

 
$
25,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
Surety bonds
 
36,819

 
36,819

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other commercial commitments
 
42,258

 
42,258

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial commitments
 
$
104,973

 
$
104,973

 
$

 
$

 
$

Warranties
The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:
 
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Balance at January 1
$
22,710

 
$
22,071

 
$
23,103

Charges to expense
33,265

 
28,590

 
29,957

Settlements
(29,220
)
 
(27,951
)
 
(30,989
)
Balance at December 31
$
26,755

 
$
22,710

 
$
22,071

Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity decreased $17.3 million to $1.77 billion at December 31, 2013 from $1.79 billion last year. The decrease in Shareholders’ equity resulted primarily from the purchase of treasury stock for $769.3 million partially offset by an increase in retained earnings of $547.6 million , an increase in


29

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

Other capital of $174.0 million , due primarily to stock options exercised, and a decrease in Cumulative other comprehensive loss of $49.3 million . The Company purchased 4.30 million shares of its common stock during 2013 for treasury. The Company acquires its common stock for general corporate purposes and, depending on its cash position and market conditions, it may acquire additional shares in the future. The Company had remaining authorization from its Board of Directors at December 31, 2013 to purchase 12.15 million shares of its common stock. The decrease of $49.3 million in Cumulative other comprehensive loss was due primarily to $96.0 million in net actuarial gains and prior service costs of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $46.7 million attributable to the weakening of most foreign operations’ functional currencies against the U.S. dollar.
The increase in Other capital of $174.0 million was due primarily to the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, stock option exercises and related income tax effect. In 2013 , redemptions of Preferred stock and Unearned ESOP compensation of $60.7 million occurred. Retained earnings increased $547.6 million during 2013 due to net income of $752.6 million partially offset by $205.0 million in cash dividends paid. The Company’s cash dividend per common share payout target is 30.0 percent of the prior year’s diluted net income per common share. The 2013 annual cash dividend of $2.00 per common share represented 33.2 percent of 2012 diluted net income per common share. The 2013 annual dividend represented the thirty-fifth consecutive year of dividend payments since the dividend was suspended in 1978. At a meeting held on February 19, 2014 , the Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend to $.55 per common share. This quarterly dividend, if approved in each of the remaining quarters of 2014 , would result in an annual dividend for 2014 of $2.20 per common share or a 30.3 percent payout of 2013 diluted net income per common share. See the Statements of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity, on page 47 of this report, and Notes 10 , 11 and 12 , on pages 66 through 69 of this report, for more information concerning Shareholders’ equity.
Cash Flow
Net operating cash increased $195.9 million to $1.08 billion in 2013 from $887.9 million in 2012 due primarily to an increase in net income of $121.5 million , a reduction in working capital of $44.3 million , year over year changes in deferred income taxes of $38.2 million , and decreased costs incurred for environmental-related matters of $19.2 million . Additionally, a payment to the ESOP for the DOL Settlement of $80.0 million in the first quarter of 2013 and a payment to the IRS for the 2011 ESOP settlement of $59.1 million in the first quarter of 2012 reduced cash flow from operations for each respective year. Net operating cash provided the funds necessary to support the Company’s acquisitions, sustain its remaining manufacturing and distribution capabilities, maintain its financial stability and return a portion of the cash generated to its shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases. Net investing cash improved $4.1 million to a usage of $338.3 million in 2013 from a usage of $342.5 million in 2012 due primarily to decreased cash usage to acquire businesses. Net financing cash decreased
 
$1.14 billion to a usage of $853.3 million in 2013 from a source of $286.6 million in 2012 due primarily to decreased proceeds from total net debt activity of $679.7 million , increased treasury stock purchases of $211.5 million , decreased proceeds from stock option exercises and income tax effect of stock-based compensation exercises and vesting totaling $208.7 million , and increased payments of cash dividends of $44.0 million . In 2013 , the Company used Net operating cash to invest $79.9 million in acquisitions, spend $166.7 million in capital additions and improvements, purchase $769.3 million in treasury stock, and pay $205.0 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock.
Management considers a measurement of cash flow that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be a useful tool in its determination of appropriate uses of the Company’s Net operating cash. Management reduces Net operating cash, as shown in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, by the amount reinvested in the business for Capital expenditures and the return of investment to its shareholders by the payments of cash dividends. The resulting value is referred to by management as “Free Cash Flow” which may not be comparable to values considered by other entities using the same terminology. The reader is cautioned that the Free Cash Flow measure should not be compared to other entities unknowingly, and it does not consider certain non-discretionary cash flows, such as mandatory debt and interest payments. The amount shown below should not be considered an alternative to Net operating cash or other cash flow amounts provided in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on page 46 of this report. Free Cash Flow as defined and used by management is determined as follows: 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Net operating cash
$
1,083,766

 
$
887,886

 
$
735,812

Capital expenditures
(166,680
)
 
(157,112
)
 
(153,801
)
Cash dividends
(204,978
)
 
(160,939
)
 
(153,512
)
Free cash flow
$
712,108

 
$
569,835

 
$
428,499



30  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Contingent Liabilities
Life Shield Engineered Systems, LLC (Life Shield) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which ceased operations in 2012. Life Shield developed and manufactured blast and fragment mitigating systems. The blast and fragment mitigating systems create a potentially higher level of product liability for the Company (as an owner of and supplier to Life Shield) than is normally associated with coatings and related products currently manufactured, distributed and sold by the Company.
Certain of Life Shield’s technology has been designated as Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology and granted a Designation under the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act) and the regulations adopted pursuant to the SAFETY Act. Under the SAFETY Act, the potentially higher level of possible product liability for Life Shield relating to the technology granted the Designation is limited to $6.0 million per occurrence in the event any such liability arises from an Act of Terrorism (as defined in the SAFETY Act). The limitation of liability provided for under the SAFETY Act does not apply to any technology not granted a designation or certification as a Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology, nor in the event that any such liability arises from an act or event other than an Act of Terrorism. Life Shield maintains insurance for liabilities up to the $6.0 million per occurrence limitation caused by failure of its products in the event of an Act of Terrorism.
Management of the Company has reviewed the potential increased liabilities associated with Life Shield’s systems and determined that potential liabilities arising from an Act of Terrorism that could ultimately affect the Company will be appropriately insured or limited by current regulations. However, due to the uncertainties involved in the future development, usage and application of Life Shield’s systems, the number or nature of possible future claims and legal proceedings, or the effect that any change in legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the limitations of potential liabilities, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of any potential costs and liabilities for the Company related to Life Shield or to Life Shield’s systems. Any potential liability for the Company that may result from Life Shield or Life Shield’s systems cannot reasonably be estimated. However, based upon, among other things, the limitation of liability under the SAFETY Act in the event of an Act of Terrorism, management does not currently believe that the costs or potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company through its ownership of Life Shield or as a supplier to Life Shield arising from the use of Life Shield’s systems will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial conditions.
Litigation
In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the
 
Company. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, the Company accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred.
Lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. The Company’s past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The Company, along with other companies, is and has been a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs’ claims have been based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. The Company is also a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints that seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. The Company believes that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending such litigation. The Company has not settled any lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation. The Company expects that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against the Company in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.


31

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

Notwithstanding the Company’s views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and the Company ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against the Company and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which the Company and other manufacturers have been successful.
Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings, or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against the Company. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or resulting from any such legislation and regulations. The Company has not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from any changes to legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
Public nuisance claim litigation . The Company and other companies are or were defendants in legal proceedings seeking recovery based on public nuisance liability theories, among other theories, brought by the State of Rhode Island, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, various cities and counties in the State of New Jersey, various cities in the State of Ohio and the State of Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the County of Santa Clara, California and other public entities in the State of California. Except for the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, all of these legal proceedings have been concluded in favor of the Company and other defendants at various stages in the proceedings.
The proceedings initiated by the State of Rhode Island included two jury trials. At the conclusion of the second trial, the
 
jury returned a verdict finding that (i) the cumulative presence of lead pigment in paints and coatings on buildings in the State of Rhode Island constitutes a public nuisance, (ii) the Company, along with two other defendants, caused or substantially contributed to the creation of the public nuisance, and (iii) the Company and two other defendants should be ordered to abate the public nuisance. The Company and two other defendants appealed and, on July 1, 2008, the Rhode Island Supreme Court, among other determinations, reversed the judgment of abatement with respect to the Company and two other defendants. The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision reversed the public nuisance liability judgment against the Company on the basis that the complaint failed to state a public nuisance claim as a matter of law.
The Santa Clara County, California proceeding was initiated in March 2000 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted various claims including fraud and concealment, strict product liability/failure to warn, strict product liability/design defect, negligence, negligent breach of a special duty, public nuisance, private nuisance, and violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. A number of the asserted claims were resolved in favor of the defendants through pre-trial proceedings. The named plaintiffs in the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on March 16, 2011, are the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano and Ventura, and the Cities of Oakland and San Diego and the City and County of San Francisco. The Fourth Amended Complaint asserted a sole claim for public nuisance, alleging that the presence of lead pigments for use in paint and coatings in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions constitutes a public nuisance. The plaintiffs sought the abatement of the alleged public nuisance that exists within the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions. A trial commenced on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants (ConAgra Grocery Products Company and NL Industries, Inc.). The final judgment held the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company strongly disagrees with the judgment. The Company has filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment, and will file a notice of appeal at the appropriate time. The Company believes that the judgment conflicts with established principles of law and is unsupported by the evidence. The Company has had a favorable history with respect to lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, particularly other public nuisance litigation, and accordingly, the Company believes that it is not probable that a loss has occurred and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential loss with respect to the case.


32  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Litigation seeking damages from alleged personal injury . The Company and other companies are defendants in a number of legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief from alleged personal injuries. These proceedings include claims by children allegedly injured from ingestion of lead pigment or lead-containing paint, claims for damages allegedly incurred by the children’s parents or guardians, and claims for damages allegedly incurred by professional painting contractors. These proceedings generally seek compensatory and punitive damages, and seek other relief including medical monitoring costs. These proceedings include purported claims by individuals, groups of individuals and class actions.
The plaintiff in Thomas v. Lead Industries Association, et al., initiated an action in state court against the Company, other alleged former lead pigment manufacturers and the Lead Industries Association in September 1999. The claims against the Company and the other defendants included strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentation and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy and enterprise liability. Implicit within these claims is the theory of “risk contribution” liability (Wisconsin’s theory which is similar to market share liability) due to the plaintiff’s inability to identify the manufacturer of any product that allegedly injured the plaintiff. The case ultimately proceeded to trial and, on November 5, 2007, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the plaintiff had ingested white lead carbonate, but was not brain damaged or injured as a result. The plaintiff appealed and, on December 16, 2010, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the final judgment in favor of the Company and other defendants.
Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction to date to apply a theory of liability with respect to alleged personal injury (i.e., risk contribution/market share liability) that does not require the plaintiff to identify the manufacturer of the product that allegedly injured the plaintiff in the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Although the risk contribution liability theory was applied during the Thomas trial, the constitutionality of this theory as applied to the lead pigment cases has not been judicially determined by the Wisconsin state courts. However, in an unrelated action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., on November 15, 2010, the District Court held that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory as applied in that case violated the defendants’ right to substantive due process and is unconstitutionally retroactive. The District Court's decision in Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., has been appealed by the plaintiff.
Insurance coverage litigation . The Company and its liability insurers, including certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, initiated legal proceedings against each other to primarily determine, among other things, whether the costs and liabilities associated with the abatement of lead pigment are covered under certain insurance policies issued to the Company. The Company’s action, filed on March 3, 2006 in the Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is currently stayed and inactive. The liability insurers’ action, which was filed on February 23, 2006 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has been dismissed. An ultimate loss
 
in the insurance coverage litigation would mean that insurance proceeds could be unavailable under the policies at issue to mitigate any ultimate abatement related costs and liabilities. The Company has not recorded any assets related to these insurance policies or otherwise assumed that proceeds from these insurance policies would be received in estimating any contingent liability accrual. Therefore, an ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation without a determination of liability against the Company in the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation will have no impact on the Company’s results of operation, liquidity or financial condition. As previously stated, however, the Company has not accrued any amounts for the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation and any significant liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued.


33

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

DOL leveraged ESOP settlement. As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, on February 20, 2013, the Company reached a settlement with the DOL of the DOL's investigation of transactions related to the Company's ESOP that were implemented on August 1, 2006 and August 27, 2003. The DOL had notified the Company, among others, of potential enforcement claims asserting breaches of fiduciary obligations and sought compensatory and equitable remedies. The Company resolved all ESOP related claims with the DOL by agreeing, in part, to make a one-time payment of $80.0 million to the ESOP, resulting in a $49.2 million after tax charge to earnings in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company made this required $80.0 million payment to the ESOP during the first quarter of 2013.
Government tax assessment settlements related to Brazilian operations (the "Brazil government tax assessments"). Charges of $28.7 million and $2.9 million were recorded to Cost of goods sold and SG&A, respectively, during 2013. The charges were primarily related to import duty taxes paid to the Brazilian government related to the handling of import duties on products brought into the country for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company elected to pay the taxes through an existing voluntary amnesty program offered by the government to resolve these issues rather than contest them in court. The after-tax charges were $21.9 million for the year. The Company's import duty process in Brazil was changed to reach a final resolution of this matter with the Brazilian government.
Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk associated with interest rate, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy, but does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , primarily to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. There were no derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The Company believes it may be exposed to continuing market risk from foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations. However, the Company does not expect that foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations or hedging contract losses will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Notes 1 and 13 on pages 48 and 70 of this report.
Financial Covenant
Certain borrowings contain a consolidated leverage covenant. The covenant states the Company’s leverage ratio is not to exceed 3.00 to 1.00. In connection with the new credit facility entered into on July 8, 2011, the leverage ratio was increased to 3.25 to 1.00. The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total indebtedness (the sum of Short-term borrowings, Current portion of long-term debt, and Long-term debt) at the reporting date to consolidated “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization” (EBITDA) for the 12-month
 
period ended on the same date. Refer to the “Results of Operations” caption below for a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net income. At December 31, 2013 , the Company was in compliance with the covenant. The Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain various default and cross-default provisions. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. See Note 7 on pages 61 and 62 of this report.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Participants in the Company’s ESOP are allowed to contribute up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. Prior to July 1, 2009, the Company matched one hundred percent of all contributions up to six percent of eligible employee contributions. Effective July 1, 2009, the ESOP was amended to change the Company match to one hundred percent on the first three percent of eligible employee contributions and fifty percent on the next two percent of eligible contributions. Effective July 1, 2011, the ESOP was amended to reinstate the Company match to six percent of eligible employee contributions. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $67.4 million in 2013 compared to $142.8 million in 2012 , including the $80.0 million DOL Settlement. The Company can fund the ESOP by redeeming a portion of the Preferred stock held by the ESOP or with cash. At December 31, 2013 , there were 13,609,442 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 13.6 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. See Note 11 , on pages 67 and 68 of this report, for more information concerning the Company’s ESOP and preferred stock.


34  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2013 vs. 2012
Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2013 and 2012 :
 
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
Change
Net Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
Paint Stores Group
$
6,002,143

 
$
5,409,947

 
10.9
 %
Consumer Group
1,341,689

 
1,321,887

 
1.5
 %
Global Finishes Group
2,004,530

 
1,960,699

 
2.2
 %
Latin America Coatings Group
832,450

 
836,057

 
-0.4
 %
Administrative
4,720

 
5,872

 
-19.6
 %
Net sales
$
10,185,532

 
$
9,534,462

 
6.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
Change
Income Before Income Taxes:
 
 
 
 
 
Paint Stores Group
$
990,523

 
$
861,763

 
14.9
 %
Consumer Group
242,061

 
216,422

 
11.8
 %
Global Finishes Group
170,591

 
147,231

 
15.9
 %
Latin America Coatings Group
38,645

 
81,238

 
-52.4
 %
Administrative
(355,862
)
 
(399,345
)
 
10.9
 %
Income before
income taxes
$
1,085,958

 
$
907,309

 
19.7
 %
Consolidated net sales for 2013 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores Group and acquisitions. One acquisition completed in 2013 and two acquisitions completed in 2012 increased consolidated net sales 1.8 percent . Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2013 consolidated net sales 0.8 percent . Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 3.9 percent to $2.13 billion for 2013 versus $2.05 billion for 2012 due primarily to acquisitions and selling price increases. Unfavorable foreign currency translation rates reduced net sales for all consolidated foreign subsidiaries during 2013 by 3.4 percent . Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 7.6 percent to $8.06 billion for 2013 versus $7.48 billion for 2012 .
Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2013 increased primarily due to higher architectural paint sales volume across all end market segments and acquisitions. Acquisitions increased net sales 2.2 percent for the year. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months increased 7.8 percent for the full year. During 2013 , the Paint Stores Group acquired 306 stores, opened 86 new stores and closed 4 redundant locations for a net increase of 388 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2013 to 3,908 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its store base an average of three percent
 
each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint increased approximately 8.7 percent for the year over 2012 . A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.
Net sales of the Consumer Group increased due primarily to acquisitions partially offset by the previously disclosed elimination of a portion of a paint program with a large retail customer. Acquisitions increased net sales 2.4 percent compared to 2012 . Sales of aerosols, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint related products, excluding acquisitions, were all up low-single digits as compared to 2012 . A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold. The Consumer Group plans to continue its promotions of new and existing products in 2014 and continue expanding its customer base and product assortment at existing customers.
The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2013 , when stated in U.S. dollars, increased due primarily to selling price increases and acquisitions partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Acquisitions increased this Group’s net sales in U.S. dollars by 1.2 percent . Paint sales volume percentage, excluding acquisitions, decreased in the low-single digits. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 0.4 percent for 2013 . In 2013 , the Global Finishes Group opened 2 new branches and closed 4 locations for a net decrease of 2 branches, decreasing the total to 300 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end. In 2014 , the Global Finishes Group expects to continue expanding its worldwide presence and improving its customer base.
The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2013 , when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes partially offset by selling price increases. Paint sales volume in 2013 was nearly flat when compared to 2012. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 7.1 percent for 2013 . In 2013 , the Latin America Coatings Group opened 14 new stores and closed 8 locations for a net increase of 6 stores, increasing the total to 282 stores open in North and South America at year-end. In 2014 , the Latin America Coatings Group expects to continue expanding its regional presence and improving its customer base.
Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, decreased by an insignificant amount in 2013 .
Consolidated gross profit increased $410.3 million in 2013 and improved as a percent to net sales to 45.3 percent from 44.1 percent in 2012 due primarily to higher paint sales volume partially offset by dilution from acquisitions and unfavorable


35

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

currency translation rate changes. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2013 increased $330.9 million compared to 2012 due primarily to higher paint sales volume and acquisitions and increased as a percent of sales due primarily to higher paint sales volume partially offset by acquisitions. Acquisitions increased Paint Stores Group's gross profits by $18.0 million , or 15.5 percent of acquisition net sales. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $47.4 million and increased as a percent of sales for 2013 over 2012 due primarily to increased production volume and improved operating efficiencies. Acquisitions increased Consumer Group's gross profits by $8.0 million , or 24.7 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2013 increased $43.6 million due primarily to selling price increases, improved operating efficiencies and acquisitions partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased as a percent of sales due primarily to selling price increases and improved operating efficiencies partially offset by dilution from acquisitions and unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Acquisitions increased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $5.7 million , or 25.2 percent of acquisition net sales, and foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $3.9 million for 2013 . The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2013 decreased $28.8 million and decreased as a percent of sales. Charges of $28.7 million recorded during 2013 reduced gross profit related to the Brazil government tax assessments. Additionally, unfavorable currency translation rate changes were only partially offset by selling price increases. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $15.4 million for 2013 . The Administrative segment’s gross profit increased by $17.1 million due primarily to the DOL Settlement recorded during 2012.
SG&A increased by $208.0 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels in nearly all Reportable Segments and acquisitions partially offset by the DOL Settlement recorded during 2012. Acquisitions added $75.6 million of SG&A in 2013 , representing 44.1 percent of acquisition net sales. SG&A decreased as a percent of sales to 34.0 percent in 2013 from 34.2 percent in 2012 . In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $204.1 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and increased expenses to maintain customer service and acquisitions SG&A, including transaction and integration costs, of $61.6 million , or 52.9 percent of acquisition net sales. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $15.9 million for the year due to increased sales levels and acquisitions SG&A of $8.1 million , or 25.0 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A increased by $13.0 million for the year relating primarily to increased sales levels and acquisitions SG&A of $5.9 million , or 26.2 percent of acquisition net sales, partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $3.0 million . The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A increased by $8.1 million for the year relating primarily to the Brazil government tax assessments and related expenses partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $10.3 million . The Administrative segment’s SG&A decreased $33.1 million primarily due to the DOL Settlement recorded during 2012 partially offset by increased
 
information systems costs to integrate previous years acquisitions and acquisition transaction expenses.
Other general expense - net decreased $2.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012 . The decrease was mainly caused by a decrease of $9.1 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to a year-over-year decrease in provisions for environmental matters of $9.5 million partially offset by increased loss on sale or disposal of assets of $1.8 million . In addition, Other general expense - net in the Consumer Group had lower income adjustments associated with prior exit or disposal activities of $5.0 million as compared to 2012 , while insignificant changes occurred in Other general expense - net of the remaining Reportable Segments. See Note 13 , on pages 69 and 70 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net .
Impairments of trademarks of $4.1 million were recorded in 2012 . As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2013 . The impairment test in 2013 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and trademarks. The impairment test in 2012 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and an impairment of $4.1 million of several indefinite-lived trademarks primarily in the Paint Stores Group as a result of planned conversion of various acquired brands. The remaining book values of these trademarks are now being amortized over their estimated future lives. The impairment charges are shown as a separate line in the Statements of Consolidated Income in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC. See Note 4 , on pages 52 and 53 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.
Interest expense, included in the Administrative segment, increased $19.9 million in 2013 versus 2012 due primarily to higher average debt levels and a one-time interest expense charge of $3.2 million from early retirement of debt during the fourth quarter.
Other expense (income) - net decreased to $0.9 million expense from $9.9 million income in 2012 . This was primarily due to foreign currency related transaction losses of $7.7 million in 2013 versus foreign currency related transaction gains of $3.1 million in 2012 , primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups. See Note 13 , on page 70 of this report, for more information concerning Other expense (income) - net .


36  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2013 increased $178.6 million due primarily to an increase of $410.3 million in gross profit partially offset by an increase of $208.0 million in SG&A and an increase of $27.7 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses. Income before income taxes increased $128.8 million in the Paint Stores Group, $23.4 million in the Global Finishes Group and $25.6 million in the Consumer Group, but declined $42.6 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2012 . The Administrative segment had a favorable impact on Income before income taxes of $43.5 million when compared to 2012 . Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries decreased 33.0 percent to $106.2 million for 2013 versus $158.4 million for 2012 due primarily to an increase in SG&A of $38.0 million , including the Brazil government tax assessments and related expenses, and reduced Other income - net of $24.1 million partially offset by an increase in gross profit of $13.4 million , which included charges to Cost of goods sold due to the Brazil government tax assessments. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 30.8 percent to $979.8 million for 2013 versus $748.9 million for 2012 .
Net income increased $121.5 million in 2013 due to the increase in Income before income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for 2013 was 30.7 percent . The effective income tax rate for 2012 was 30.4 percent . Diluted net income per common share increased 20.6 percent to $7.26 per share for 2013 , which included charges relating to the Brazil government tax assessments ( $.21 per share), from $6.02 per share a year ago, which included charges relating to the DOL Settlement ( $.47 per share).
Management considers a measurement that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles a useful measurement of the operational profitability of the Company. Some investment professionals also utilize such a measurement as an indicator of the value of profits and cash that are generated strictly from operating activities, putting aside working capital and certain other balance sheet changes. For this measurement, management increases Net income for significant non-operating and non-cash expense items to arrive at an amount known as EBITDA. The reader is cautioned that the following value for EBITDA should not be compared to other entities unknowingly. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to Net income or Net operating cash as an indicator of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. The reader should refer to the determination of Net income and Net operating cash in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on pages 44 and 46 of this report. EBITDA as used by management is calculated as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

Interest expense
62,714

 
42,788

 
42,497

Income taxes
333,397

 
276,275

 
299,688

Depreciation
158,763

 
152,217

 
151,212

Amortization
29,031

 
26,985

 
29,692

EBITDA
$
1,336,466

 
$
1,129,299

 
$
964,949

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2012 vs. 2011
Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2012 and 2011
  
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2012
 
2011
 
Change
Net Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
Paint Stores Group
$
5,409,947

 
$
4,779,826

 
13.2
 %
Consumer Group
1,321,887

 
1,274,281

 
3.7
 %
Global Finishes Group
1,960,699

 
1,878,326

 
4.4
 %
Latin America Coatings Group
836,057

 
828,451

 
0.9
 %
Administrative
5,872

 
4,815

 
22.0
 %
Net sales
$
9,534,462

 
$
8,765,699

 
8.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)
2012
 
2011
 
Change
Income Before Income Taxes:
 
 
 
 
 
Paint Stores Group
$
861,763

 
$
645,743

 
33.5
 %
Consumer Group
216,422

 
173,654

 
24.6
 %
Global Finishes Group
147,231

 
90,271

 
63.1
 %
Latin America Coatings Group
81,238

 
75,494

 
7.6
 %
Administrative
(399,345
)
 
(243,614
)
 
-63.9
 %
Income before
income taxes
$
907,309

 
$
741,548

 
22.4
 %
Consolidated net sales for 2012 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores Group and selling price increases across all Reportable segments. Two acquisitions completed in 2012 and one acquisition completed in 2011 increased consolidated net sales 0.9 percent. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2012 consolidated net sales 1.8 percent. Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 3.4 percent to $2.05 billion for 2012 versus $1.98 billion for 2011 due primarily to acquisitions and selling price increases. Unfavorable foreign currency translation rates reduced net sales for all consolidated foreign subsidiaries during 2012 by 7.9 percent. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 10.3 percent to $7.48 billion for 2012 versus $6.78 billion for 2011.


37

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 

Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2012 increased primarily due to higher paint sales volume and selling price increases. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months increased 12.5 percent for the full year. During 2012, the Paint Stores Group opened 81 new stores and closed 11 redundant locations for a net increase of 70 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2012 to 3,520 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its store base an average of three percent each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint increased approximately 10.2 percent for the year over 2011. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.
Net sales of the Consumer Group increased due primarily to selling price increases and acquisitions. Acquisitions increased net sales 3.2 percent compared to 2011. Sales of aerosols, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint-related products were all up mid-single digits as compared to 2011. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold. The Consumer Group plans to continue its promotions of new and existing products in 2013 and continue expanding its customer base and product assortment at existing customers.
The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2012, when stated in U.S. dollars, increased due primarily to selling price increases, higher paint sales volume, and acquisitions partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Acquisitions increased this Group’s net sales in U.S. dollars by 1.8 percent. Paint sales volume percentage, excluding acquisitions, increased in the low-single digits. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 3.5 percent for 2012. In 2012, the Global Finishes Group opened 1 new branch and closed 2 locations for a net decrease of 1 branch, decreasing the total to 302 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end. In 2013, the Global Finishes Group expects to continue expanding its worldwide presence and improving its customer base.
The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2012, when stated in U.S. dollars, increased due primarily to selling price increases and higher paint sales volume partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Paint sales volume percentage increased in the low-single digits. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 10.2 percent for 2012. In 2012, the Latin America Coatings Group opened 17 new stores and closed 6 locations for a net increase of 11 stores, increasing the total to 276 stores open in North and South America at year-end. In 2013, the Latin America Coatings Group expects to continue expanding its regional presence and improving its customer base.
Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space
 
and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, increased by an insignificant amount in 2012.
Consolidated gross profit increased $461.7 million in 2012 and improved as a percent to net sales to 44.1 percent from 42.7 percent in 2011 due primarily to higher paint sales volume and selling price increases partially offset by increases in raw material costs and unfavorable currency translation rate changes. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2012 increased $370.2 million compared to 2011 and increased as a percent of sales due primarily to higher paint sales volume and selling price increases partially offset by increases in raw material costs. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $62.5 million and increased as a percent of sales for 2012 over 2011 due primarily to selling price increases and improved operating efficiencies partially offset by increases in raw material costs. Acquisitions increased Consumer Group's gross profits by $8.7 million, or 21.5 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2012 increased $52.3 million and increased as a percent of sales due primarily to selling price increases and higher paint sales volume partially offset by increases in raw material costs and unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Acquisitions increased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $8.2 million, or 23.7 percent of acquisition net sales, and foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $19.1 million for 2012. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2012 decreased $2.3 million and decreased slightly as a percent of sales. Selling price increases and improved sales volumes were not enough to offset higher raw material costs and unfavorable currency translation rate changes which reduced gross profit dollars. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $26.6 million for 2012. The Administrative segment’s gross profit decreased by $21.0 million due primarily to the DOL Settlement.
SG&A increased by $298.8 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels in all Reportable Segments, the DOL Settlement and acquisitions. Acquisitions added $16.3 million of SG&A in 2012, representing 21.6 percent of acquisition net sales. SG&A increased as a percent of sales to 34.2 percent in 2012 from 33.8 percent in 2011. In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $153.7 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and increased expenses to maintain customer service. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $23.6 million for the year due to increased sales levels and acquisitions SG&A of $7.1 million, or 17.6 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A increased by $2.1 million for the year relating primarily to


38  

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

increased sales levels and acquisitions SG&A of $9.2 million, or 26.4 percent of acquisition net sales, partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $15.9 million. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A decreased by $2.4 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $17.5 million partially offset by increased expenses to support higher sales volume levels. The Administrative segment’s SG&A increased $121.9 million primarily due to an increase in incentive compensation, including stock-based compensation expense, the DOL Settlement and information systems costs to integrate previous years acquisitions. See Note 12 , on pages 68 through 69 of this report, for more information concerning stock-based compensation.
Other general expense - net increased $2.5 million in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was mainly caused by an increase of $6.7 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to loss on sale or disposal of assets of $3.5 million in 2012 versus a gain on sale of assets of $5.5 million in 2011. Partially offsetting this unfavorable comparison was a decrease in provisions for environmental matters of $2.4 million in the Administrative segment. In addition, Other general expense - net in the Consumer Group had higher income adjustments associated with prior exit or disposal activities of $3.1 million as compared to 2011, while insignificant changes occurred in Other general expense - net of the remaining Reportable Segments. See Note 13 , on pages 69 and 70 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net.
Impairments of trademarks decreased $1.4 million in 2012 compared to 2011. As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2012. The impairment test in 2012 and 2011 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and an impairment of $4.1 million and $5.5 million, respectively, of several indefinite-lived trademarks primarily in the Paint Stores Group for both years as a result of planned conversion of various acquired brands. The remaining book values of these trademarks are now being amortized over their estimated future lives. The impairment charges are shown as a separate line in the Statements of Consolidated Income in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC. See Note 4 , on pages 52 and 53 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.
Interest expense, included in the Administrative segment, increased $0.3 million in 2012 versus 2011 due primarily to
 
higher average debt levels.
Other income - net increased to $9.9 million income from $4.8 million income in 2011. This was primarily due to foreign currency related transaction gains of $3.1 million in 2012 versus foreign currency related transaction losses of $4.7 million in 2011, primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups. See Note 13 , on page 70 of this report, for more information concerning Other income - net.
Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2012 increased $165.8 million due primarily to an increase of $461.7 million in gross profit and a reduction of $1.5 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses, partially offset by an increase of $298.8 million in SG&A. Income before income taxes increased $216.0 million in the Paint Stores Group, $57.0 million in the Global Finishes Group, $42.8 million in the Consumer Group and $5.7 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2011. The Administrative segment had a unfavorable impact on Income before income taxes of $155.7 million when compared to 2011. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 29.4 percent to $158.4 million for 2012 versus $122.4 million for 2011 due primarily to increases in gross profit of $8.0 million and Other income - net of $43.0 million partially offset by an increase in SG&A of $13.3 million. Favorable foreign currency translation rates, partially offset by acquisitions, decreased segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries by 14.0 percent. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 21.0 percent to $748.9 million for 2012 versus $619.1 million for 2011.
Net income increased $189.2 million in 2012 due to the increase in Income before income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for 2012 was 30.4 percent. The effective income tax rate for 2011 was 40.4 percent, including income tax expense of $75.0 million relating to the IRS Settlement. Excluding the impact of the IRS Settlement would result in an effective income tax rate for 2011 of 30.3 percent. Diluted net income per common share increased 45.4 percent to $6.02 per share for 2012, which included charges relating to the DOL Settlement ($.47 per share), from $4.14 per share a year ago, which included charges relating to the IRS Settlement ($.70 per share) and dilution from acquisitions ($.04 per share).





39


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Shareholders
The Sherwin-Williams Company
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We recognize that internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and is subject to the possibility of human error or the circumvention or the overriding of internal control. Therefore, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, we believe we have designed into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In order to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013 , we conducted an assessment of its effectiveness under the supervision and with the participation of our management group, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. This assessment was based on the 1992 criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, management excluded the non-integrated operations of this acquisition from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Non-integrated operations of this acquisition constituted approximately four percent of consolidated total assets (excluding goodwill and other intangible assets) as of December 31, 2013, and increased consolidated net sales by one percent and decreased consolidated net income by 2% for the year then ended. Operations of this acquisition will be included in the Company's assessment as of December 31, 2014.
Based on our assessment of internal control over financial reporting under the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2013 , the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and their report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included on page 41 of this report.

C. M. Connor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

S. P. Hennessy
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer


A. J. Mistysyn
Vice President - Corporate Controller

40  


REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Shareholders and the Board of Directors
The Sherwin-Williams Company
We have audited The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 , based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Sherwin-Williams Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the U.S./Canada business of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. (Comex), which is included in the 2013 consolidated financial statements of the Sherwin-Williams Company and constituted approximately four percent of consolidated total assets (excluding goodwill and other intangible assets) as of December 31, 2013 and increased consolidated net sales by one percent and decreased consolidated net income by two percent for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2013 also did not include an evaluation of and conclusion on the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting of the U.S./Canada business of Comex.
In our opinion, The Sherwin-Williams Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 , based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , and the related statements of consolidated income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended and our report dated February 27, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.



Cleveland, Ohio
February 27, 2014

41


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Shareholders
The Sherwin-Williams Company
We are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and for the years then ended in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial information included in this report contains certain amounts that were based upon our best estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe were reasonable under the circumstances.
We have conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As discussed in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on page 40 of this report, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013 .
The Board of Directors pursues its responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s accounting policies and procedures, financial statement preparation and internal control over financial reporting through the Audit Committee, comprised exclusively of independent directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with financial management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review the adequacy of financial controls, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the nature, extent and results of the audit effort. Both the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm have private and confidential access to the Audit Committee at all times.
We believe that the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report fairly reflect the form and substance of all material financial transactions and fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented.

C. M. Connor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

S. P. Hennessy
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A. J. Mistysyn
Vice President - Corporate Controller

42  


REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Shareholders and the Board of Directors
The Sherwin-Williams Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , and the related statements of consolidated income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Sherwin-Williams Company at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 , based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.





Cleveland, Ohio
February 27, 2014
 


43

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(thousands of dollars except per common share data)

 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales
$
10,185,532

 
$
9,534,462

 
$
8,765,699

Cost of goods sold
5,568,966

 
5,328,236

 
5,021,137

 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit (1)
4,616,566

 
4,206,226

 
3,744,562

Percent to net sales
45.3
%
 
44.1
%
 
42.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1)
3,467,681

 
3,259,648

 
2,960,814

Percent to net sales
34.0
%
 
34.2
%
 
33.8
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other general expense - net
2,519

 
5,248

 
2,731

Impairment of trademarks
 
 
4,086

 
5,492

Interest expense
62,714

 
42,788

 
42,497

Interest and net investment income
(3,242
)
 
(2,913
)
 
(3,711
)
Other expense (income) - net
936

 
(9,940
)
 
(4,809
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes
1,085,958

 
907,309

 
741,548

Income taxes (1), (2)
333,397

 
276,275

 
299,688

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
7.41

 
$
6.15

 
$
4.22

Diluted
$
7.26

 
$
6.02

 
$
4.14

(1) Includes DOL Settlement of $49,163 , net of tax (Cost of goods sold $16,000 , Selling, general and administrative expenses $64,000 and tax benefit $30,837 ), or $.47 per share in the Year ended December 31, 2012.
(2) Includes IRS Settlement of $74,982 , or approximately $.70 per share, in the Year ended December 31, 2011. See Note 14 for more information on the IRS Settlement.
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(46,748
)
 
(7,403
)
 
(65,632
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial gains (losses) and prior service costs
 
 
 
 
 
arising during period (3)
85,051

 
(6,192
)
 
(36,415
)
Less: amortization of net actuarial losses and
 
 
 
 
 
prior service costs included in Net pension costs (4)
10,933

 
10,973

 
13,045

 
95,984

 
4,781

 
(23,370
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized holding gains (losses)
 
 
 
 
 
arising during period (5)
134

 
123

 
(623
)
Less: reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses
 
 
 
 
 
included in net income (6)
(25
)
 
(12
)
 
68

 
109

 
111

 
(555
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
49,345

 
(2,511
)
 
(89,557
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income
$
801,906

 
$
628,523

 
$
352,303

(3) Net of taxes of $(63,342) , $2,846 and $25,504 , in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
(4) Net of taxes of $(7,643) , $(13,350) and $(8,183) , in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
(5) Net of taxes of $(84) , $(77) and $256 , in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
(6) Net of taxes of $17 , $7 and $(42) in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

44  

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands of dollars)

 
December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
744,889

 
$
862,590

 
$
32,696

Accounts receivable, less allowance
1,097,751

 
1,032,508

 
989,873

Inventories:
 
 
 
 
 
Finished goods
779,057

 
732,359

 
730,727

Work in process and raw materials
191,758

 
187,965

 
196,082

 
970,815

 
920,324

 
926,809

Deferred income taxes
104,496

 
126,730

 
149,207

Other current assets
240,766

 
207,086

 
163,008

Total current assets
3,158,717

 
3,149,238

 
2,261,593

 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
1,178,687

 
1,156,005

 
1,108,008

Intangible assets
313,299

 
347,553

 
305,873

Deferred pension assets
302,446

 
249,911

 
228,350

Other assets
407,975

 
366,134

 
368,898

Property, plant and equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
Land
125,131

 
102,336

 
105,010

Buildings
715,096

 
677,944

 
668,802

Machinery and equipment
1,838,590

 
1,750,729

 
1,657,874

Construction in progress
62,563

 
56,582

 
41,264

 
2,741,380

 
2,587,591

 
2,472,950

Less allowances for depreciation
1,719,997

 
1,621,695

 
1,516,420

 
1,021,383

 
965,896

 
956,530

Total Assets
$
6,382,507

 
$
6,234,737

 
$
5,229,252

 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
$
96,551

 
$
69,035

 
$
346,313

Accounts payable
998,484

 
922,999

 
965,149

Compensation and taxes withheld
337,637

 
314,892

 
251,060

Accrued taxes
79,504

 
52,104

 
120,555

Current portion of long-term debt
502,948

 
3,689

 
7,823

Other accruals
513,433

 
513,717

 
471,761

Total current liabilities
2,528,557

 
1,876,436

 
2,162,661

 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt
1,122,373

 
1,632,165

 
639,231

Postretirement benefits other than pensions
268,874

 
320,223

 
297,528

Other long-term liabilities
688,168

 
614,109

 
612,913

 
 
 
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock - $1.00 par value:
 
 
 
 
 
    100,129,380, 103,270,067 and 103,854,234 shares outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively
112,902

 
111,623

 
107,454

Preferred stock - convertible, no par value:
 
 
 
 
 
40,406, 101,086 and 160,273 shares outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively
40,406

 
101,086

 
160,273

Unearned ESOP compensation
(40,406
)
 
(101,086
)
 
(160,273
)
Other capital
1,847,801

 
1,673,788

 
1,297,625

Retained earnings
1,774,050

 
1,226,467

 
756,372

Treasury stock, at cost
(1,639,174
)
 
(849,685
)
 
(276,654
)
Cumulative other comprehensive loss
(321,044
)
 
(370,389
)
 
(367,878
)
Total shareholders’ equity
1,774,535

 
1,791,804

 
1,516,919

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
6,382,507

 
$
6,234,737

 
$
5,229,252

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

45

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(thousands of dollars)

 
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Activities
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
158,763

 
152,217

 
151,212

Amortization of intangible assets
29,031

 
26,985

 
29,692

Impairment of trademarks and goodwill
 
 
4,086

 
5,492

Provisions for environmental-related matters
(2,751
)
 
6,736

 
9,100

Provisions for qualified exit costs
4,682

 
2,734

 
534

Deferred income taxes
27,775

 
(10,422
)
 
16,913

Defined benefit pension plans net cost
20,641

 
20,309

 
12,326

Income tax effect of ESOP on other capital
 
 
 
 
(3,211
)
Stock-based compensation expense
58,004

 
54,348

 
48,176

Net increase in postretirement liability
5,233

 
3,666

 
6,793

Decrease in non-traded investments
57,261

 
72,861

 
62,540

Loss (gain) on disposition of assets
5,207

 
3,454

 
(5,469
)
Other
(27,214
)
 
(18,349
)
 
3,137

Change in working capital accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) in accounts receivable
(41,473
)
 
(33,578
)
 
(93,697
)
Decrease (increase) in inventories
25,031

 
19,929

 
(19,222
)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
34,685

 
(51,124
)
 
64,053

Increase (decrease) in accrued taxes
11,314

 
(70,264
)
 
5,435

Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and taxes withheld
24,435

 
63,697

 
(538
)
Increase (decrease) in refundable income taxes
13,244

 
(32,967
)
 
(572
)
DOL settlement accrual
(80,000
)
 
80,000

 
 
Other
43,804

 
11,000

 
36,249

Costs incurred for environmental-related matters
(12,539
)
 
(31,689
)
 
(30,451
)
Costs incurred for qualified exit costs
(7,419
)
 
(4,577
)
 
(6,181
)
Other
(16,509
)
 
(12,200
)
 
1,641

Net operating cash
1,083,766

 
887,886

 
735,812

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing Activities
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
(166,680
)
 
(157,112
)
 
(153,801
)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
(79,940
)
 
(99,242
)
 
(44,436
)
Proceeds from sale of assets
3,045

 
9,677

 
12,842

Increase in other investments
(94,739
)
 
(95,778
)
 
(92,374
)
Net investing cash
(338,314
)
 
(342,455
)
 
(277,769
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
31,634

 
(284,839
)
 
(43,346
)
Proceeds from long-term debt
473

 
999,697

 
40,777

Payments of long-term debt
(10,932
)
 
(14,000
)
 
(49,881
)
Payments of cash dividends
(204,978
)
 
(160,939
)
 
(153,512
)
Proceeds from stock options exercised
69,761

 
221,126

 
69,536

Income tax effect of stock-based compensation exercises and vesting
47,527

 
104,858

 
12,958

Treasury stock purchased
(769,271
)
 
(557,766
)
 
(367,372
)
Other
(17,522
)
 
(21,559
)
 
15,631

Net financing cash
(853,308
)
 
286,578

 
(475,209
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(9,845
)
 
(2,115
)
 
(8,723
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(117,701
)
 
829,894

 
(25,889
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
862,590

 
32,696

 
58,585

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
744,889

 
$
862,590

 
$
32,696

Taxes paid on income
$
200,748

 
$
223,329

 
$
196,147

Interest paid on debt
61,045

 
41,551

 
42,897


See notes to consolidated financial statements.

46  

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 
Common
Stock
 
Preferred
Stock
 
Unearned
ESOP
Compen-sation
 
Other
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Cumulative
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2011
$
231,346

 
$
216,753

 
$
(216,753
)
 
$
1,222,909

 
$
4,824,489

 
$
(4,390,983
)
 
$
(278,321
)
 
$
1,609,440

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
441,860

 
 
 
 
 
441,860

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(89,557
)
 
(89,557
)
Treasury stock purchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(367,372
)
 
 
 
(367,372
)
Treasury stock retired
(125,426
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,356,465
)
 
4,481,891

 
 
 


Redemption of preferred stock
 
 
(56,480
)
 
56,480

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Income tax effect of ESOP*
 
 
 
 
 
 
(54,420
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(54,420
)
Stock options exercised
1,234

 
 
 
 
 
68,302

 
 
 
(190
)
 
 
 
69,346

Income tax effect of stock compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,958

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,958

Restricted stock and stock option grants
(net activity)
300

 
 
 
 
 
47,876

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
48,176

Cash dividends - $1.46 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(153,512
)
 
 
 
 
 
(153,512
)
Balance at December 31, 2011
107,454

 
160,273

 
(160,273
)
 
1,297,625

 
756,372

 
(276,654
)
 
(367,878
)
 
1,516,919

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
631,034

 
 
 
 
 
631,034

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,511
)
 
(2,511
)
Treasury stock purchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(557,766
)
 
 
 
(557,766
)
Redemption of preferred stock
 
 
(59,187
)
 
59,187

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Stock options exercised
3,867

 
 
 
 
 
217,259

 
 
 
(15,265
)
 
 
 
205,861

Income tax effect of stock compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
104,858

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
104,858

Restricted stock and stock option grants
(net activity)
302

 
 
 
 
 
54,046

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
54,348

Cash dividends - $1.56 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(160,939
)
 
 
 
 
 
(160,939
)
Balance at December 31, 2012
111,623

 
101,086

 
(101,086
)
 
1,673,788

 
1,226,467

 
(849,685
)
 
(370,389
)
 
1,791,804

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
752,561

 
 
 
 
 
752,561

Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
49,345

 
49,345

Treasury stock purchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(769,271
)
 
 
 
(769,271
)
Redemption of preferred stock
 
 
(60,680
)
 
60,680

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Stock options exercised
1,128

 
 
 
 
 
68,633

 
 
 
(20,218
)
 
 
 
49,543

Income tax effect of stock compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
47,527

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
47,527

Restricted stock and stock option grants
(net activity)
151

 
 
 
 
 
57,853

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58,004

Cash dividends - $2.00 per common share
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(204,978
)
 
 
 
 
 
(204,978
)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
112,902

 
$
40,406

 
$
(40,406
)
 
$
1,847,801

 
$
1,774,050

 
$
(1,639,174
)
 
$
(321,044
)
 
$
1,774,535

 
* Includes $51,209 reduction in Other capital related to IRS Settlement. See Note 14 for more information on the IRS Settlement.











See notes to consolidated financial statements.

47

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, “the Company.”) Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those amounts.
Nature of operations. The Company is engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America, with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia.
Reportable segments. See Note 18 for further details.
Cash flows. Management considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Fair value of financial instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported for Cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.
Short-term investments: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term investments approximate fair value.
Investments in securities: Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at market value. See the recurring fair value measurement table on page 49 .
 
Non-traded investments: The Company has invested in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets. These non-traded investments have been identified as variable interest entities. However, because the Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), the investments are not consolidated. The Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized over the period that the tax credits are recognized. The carrying amounts of the investments, included in Other assets, were $210,779 , $223,701 and $232,366 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The liabilities recorded on the balance sheets for estimated future capital contributions to the investments were $198,761 , $218,688 and $235,355 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term borrowings approximate fair value.
Long-term debt (including current portion): The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded debt, shown below, are based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded debt, also shown below, are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company's publicly traded debt and non-traded debt are classified as level 1 and level 2, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7 .


 
December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Publicly traded debt
$
1,620,646

 
$
1,614,739

 
$
1,630,056

 
$
1,706,487

 
$
632,423

 
$
703,238

Non-traded debt
4,675

 
4,430

 
5,798

 
5,600

 
14,631

 
14,070


Derivative instruments: The Company utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2013, 2012 and 2011, primarily to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. See Note 13 . There were no derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
 
Fair value measurements. The following tables summarize the Company’s assets and liabilities measured on a recurring and non-recurring basis in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC:



48  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2013
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation plan asset (a)
$
21,660

 
$
3,759

 
$
17,901

 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation plan liability (b)
$
28,607

 
$
28,607

 
 
 
 
(a)
The deferred compensation plan asset consists of the investment funds maintained for the future payments under the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan, which is structured as a rabbi trust. The investments are marketable securities accounted for under the Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the ASC. The level 1 investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares. The level 2 investments are valued based on vendor or broker models. The cost basis of the investment funds is $21,224 .
(b)
The deferred compensation plan liability represents the value of the Company’s liability under its deferred compensation plan based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis. Except for the acquisition-related fair value measurements described in Note 2 which qualify as level 2 measurements, there were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in 2013 .
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $54,460 , $47,667 and $51,747 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, to reduce Accounts receivable to their estimated net realizable value. The allowance was based on an analysis of historical bad debts, a review of the aging of Accounts receivable and the current creditworthiness of customers. Account receivable balances are written-off against the allowance if a final determination of uncollectibility is made. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are related to the creditworthiness of accounts and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.
Reserve for obsolescence. The Company recorded a reserve for obsolescence of $97,523 , $88,356 and $82,671 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, to reduce Inventories to their estimated net realizable value. 
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for by the purchase method. In accordance with the Impairments Topic of the ASC, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and in between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4 .
Intangible assets. Intangible assets include trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights. As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, indefinite-lived trademarks are not amortized, but instead are tested annually for impairment, and between annual tests whenever an event occurs or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4 . The cost of finite-lived trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit as follows:
 
 
Useful Life
Finite-lived trademarks
5 years
Non-compete covenants
3 – 5 years
Certain intangible property rights
3 – 20 years
Accumulated amortization of finite-lived intangible assets was $279,102 , $260,065 and $237,736 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. See Note 4 .
Impairment of long-lived assets. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, management evaluates the recoverability and estimated remaining lives of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. See Notes 4 and 5 .
Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method. Depreciation and amortization are included in the appropriate Cost of goods sold or Selling, general and administrative expense caption on the Statements of Consolidated Income. Included in Property, plant and equipment are leasehold improvements. The major classes of assets and ranges of annual depreciation rates are:
Buildings
2.5% – 20.0%
Machinery and equipment
5.0% – 20.0%
Furniture and fixtures
10.0% – 33.3%
Automobiles and trucks
10.0% – 33.3%
Standby letters of credit. The Company occasionally enters into standby letter of credit agreements to guarantee various operating activities. These agreements provide credit availability to the various beneficiaries if certain contractual events occur. Amounts outstanding under these agreements totaled $25,896 , $22,845 and $18,819 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.


49

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

Product warranties. The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience and included an amount in Other accruals. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Balance at January 1
$
22,710

 
$
22,071

 
$
23,103

Charges to expense
33,265

 
28,590

 
29,957

Settlements
(29,220
)
 
(27,951
)
 
(30,989
)
Balance at December 31
$
26,755

 
$
22,710

 
$
22,071

Environmental matters. Capital expenditures for ongoing environmental compliance measures were recorded in Property, plant and equipment, and related expenses were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrued for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs could be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation and indirect costs such as compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, consulting and law firms. See Notes 8 and 13 .
Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan and preferred stock. The Company accounts for the Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan (ESOP) in accordance with the Employee Stock Ownership Plans Subtopic of the Compensation – Stock Ownership Topic of the ASC. The Company recognized compensation expense for amounts contributed to the ESOP, and the ESOP used dividends on unallocated preferred shares to service debt. Unallocated preferred shares held by the ESOP were not considered outstanding in calculating earnings per share of the Company. See Note 11 .
Defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans in accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, which requires the recognition of a plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. See Note 6 .
Stock-based compensation. The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. See Note 12 .
 
Foreign currency translation. All consolidated non-highly inflationary foreign operations use the local currency of the country of operation as the functional currency and translated the local currency asset and liability accounts at year-end exchange rates while income and expense accounts were translated at average exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments were included in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity.
Cumulative other comprehensive loss. At December 31, 2013 , the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $250,943 , net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $70,611 and unrealized net gains on marketable equity securities of $510 . At December 31, 2012 and 2011 , the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $204,195 and $196,792 , respectively, net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $166,595 and $171,376 , respectively, and unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $401 and $290 , respectively.
Revenue recognition. All revenues were recognized when products were shipped and title had passed to unaffiliated customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue was reasonably assured at the time of recognition.
Customer and vendor consideration. The Company offered certain customers rebate and sales incentive programs which were classified as reductions in Net sales. Such programs were in the form of volume rebates, rebates that constituted a percentage of sales or rebates for attaining certain sales goals. The Company received consideration from certain suppliers of raw materials in the form of volume rebates or rebates that constituted a percentage of purchases. These rebates were recognized on an accrual basis by the Company as a reduction of the purchase price of the raw materials and a subsequent reduction of Cost of goods sold when the related product was sold.
Costs of goods sold. Included in Costs of goods sold were costs for materials, manufacturing, distribution and related support. Distribution costs included all expenses related to the


50  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

distribution of products including inbound freight charges, purchase and receiving costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs and all costs incurred to ship products. Also included in Costs of goods sold were total technical expenditures, which included research and development costs, quality control, product formulation expenditures and other similar items. Research and development costs included in technical expenditures were $47,042 , $44,648 and $41,719 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling costs included advertising expenses, marketing costs, employee and store costs and sales commissions. The cost of advertising was expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $262,492 , $247,469 and $227,303 in advertising costs during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. General and administrative expenses included human resources, legal, finance and other support and administrative functions.
Earnings per share. Shares of preferred stock held in an unallocated account of the ESOP (see Note 11 ) and common stock held in a revocable trust (see Note 10 ) were not considered outstanding shares for basic or diluted income per common share calculations. All references to “shares” or “per share” information throughout this report relate to common shares and are stated on a diluted per common share basis, unless otherwise indicated. Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated using the two-class method in accordance with the Earnings Per Common Share Topic of the ASC. Basic net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus all dilutive securities potentially outstanding during the year. See Note 15 .
Impact of recently issued accounting standards. In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-2, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). The updated standard requires the presentation of information about reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU No. 2013-2 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company has adopted the standard on a prospective basis as required. The updated standard affects the Company's disclosures but has no impact on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS
On November 9, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. (Comex) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.34 billion , including assumed debt. However, on July 17, 2013, the Federal Competition Commission of Mexico (Commission) informed the Company that the acquisition of Comex was not authorized. The Company appealed the Commission's decision.
 
On September 16, 2013, the Stock Purchase Agreement was amended and restated to extend the date by which the agreement can be terminated by either party to March 31, 2014. Additionally, the Stock Purchase Agreement was amended to reflect a revised purchase price of approximately $2.25 billion . On October 29, 2013, the Commission informed the Company that the Company's appeal relating to its pending acquisition of Comex's Mexico business was denied and the acquisition is not authorized. The Company is currently reviewing the Commission's decision and is considering all options, including whether to refile with the Commission. Comex is a leader in the paint and coatings market in Mexico with headquarters in Mexico City. Also on September 16, 2013, the Company entered into a new definitive Stock Purchase Agreement and completed the acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business for an aggregate consideration paid of $74,941 , net of cash acquired. The Company has engaged an independent valuation firm to value the assets of the acquired business. Substantially all of the valuation firm's work has been completed, and the Company has recorded the appropriate adjustments. Once the valuation firm's work is finalized, the Company will record any remaining necessary adjustments. The acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill and intangible assets. The U.S./Canada business of Comex focuses on the manufacture and sale of paint and paint-related products through retail service centers under various proprietary brands. The acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex strengthens the ability of the Paint Stores Group and Consumer Group to serve customers in key geographic markets.
Effective December 18, 2012, the Company acquired Jiangsu Pulanna Coating Co., Ltd. (Pulanna). Headquartered in Changzhou, China, Pulanna is a leading automotive refinishes coatings manufacturer in China. The acquisition strengthens the Global Finishes Group's established presence in China and its ability to serve automotive customers around the world.
Effective June 1, 2012, the Company acquired Geocel Holdings Corporation. Geocel manufactures innovative caulks, sealants and adhesives specially designed for tough construction and repair applications in commercial, residential, industrial and transport non-automotive markets. Geocel has operations in both the United States and United Kingdom. The acquisition strengthens the Consumer Group’s sealant and adhesive market position.


51

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

The aggregate consideration paid for Pulanna and Geocel was $99,242 , net of cash acquired. Both acquisitions resulted in the recognition of goodwill and intangible assets. See Note 4 .
The completed acquisitions above have been accounted for as purchases and their results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
The following unaudited pro-forma summary presents consolidated financial information as if the U.S./Canada business of Comex, Pulanna and Geocel had been acquired at the beginning of 2012 . The unaudited pro-forma consolidated financial information does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place on January 1, 2012 or the future results of operations of the combined companies under ownership and operation of the Company.
 
2013
 
2012
Net sales
$
10,540,181

 
$
10,101,502

Net income
725,774

 
594,632

Net income per common share:
 
 
 
Basic
7.13

 
5.80

Diluted
6.98

 
5.68

NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES
Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The following presents the effect on inventories, net income and net income per common share had the Company used the first-in, first-out (FIFO) inventory valuation method adjusted for income taxes at the statutory rate and assuming no other adjustments. Management believes that the use of LIFO results in a better matching of costs and revenues. This information is presented to enable the reader to make comparisons with companies using the FIFO method of inventory valuation. During 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , certain inventories accounted for on the LIFO method were reduced, resulting in the liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years. The 2013 and 2011 liquidations increased net income by $169 and $1,067 , respectively, while the 2012 liquidations reduced net income by $160 .
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Percentage of total
inventories on LIFO
75
%
 
75
%
 
77
%
Excess of FIFO over
LIFO
$
337,214

 
$
357,303

 
$
378,986

Increase (decrease) in net
income due to LIFO
12,299

 
13,365

 
(62,636
)
Increase (decrease) in net
income per common
share due to LIFO
.12

 
.13

 
(.59
)
 
NOTE 4 – GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS
During 2013, the Company recognized $1,885 of goodwill and $466 of indefinite-lived trademarks in the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex. Acquired customer relationships valued at $4,230 are being amortized over 7 years from the date of acquisition.
During 2012 and 2013, the Company recognized $60,027 of goodwill and $968 of indefinite-lived trademarks related to the 2012 acquisitions of Geocel and Pulanna. Acquired customer relationships, finite-lived trademarks, intellectual property and covenants not to compete recognized in these acquisitions valued at $25,120 , $13,000 , $4,955 and $1,335 , respectively, are being amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 15 years from the date of acquisition.
During 2011, the Company recognized $5,039 of goodwill in the acquisition of Leighs Paints. Acquired technology, trademarks and customer relationships recognized in this acquisition valued at $4,794 , $2,125 and $1,918 , respectively, are being amortized over periods ranging from 5 to 10 years from the date of acquisition.
In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life may have changed, impairment tests are to be performed. Undiscounted cash flows are to be used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets are impaired. Where impairment is identified, a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets, is to be used to determine the fair value for the assets to measure any potential impairment.
In 2011, a reduction in the carrying value of property, plant and equipment associated with a facility closed during 2008 was recorded (see Note 5 ).
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, and interim impairment tests are performed whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate an impairment has more likely than not occurred. October 1 has been established for the annual impairment review. At the time of impairment testing, values are estimated separately for goodwill and trademarks with indefinite lives using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. An optional qualitative assessment may alleviate the need to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test when impairment is unlikely. The Company used the qualitative assessment for each of its reporting units in 2013 and 2012. Impairments of trademarks with indefinite lives have been reported as a separate line in the Statements of Consolidated Income.


52  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

The annual impairment review performed as of October 1, 2013 did not result in any goodwill or trademark impairment.
The annual impairment review performed as of October 1, 2012 resulted in trademark impairments in the Paint Stores Group and Global Finishes Group of $3,400 and $686 , respectively, and no goodwill impairment. The trademark impairments related primarily to the planned conversion of various acquired brands.
 
The annual impairment review performed as of October 1, 2011 resulted in trademark impairments in the Paint Stores Group and Global Finishes Group of $4,669 and $823 , respectively, and no goodwill impairment. The trademark impairments related primarily to lower-than-anticipated sales of acquired brands.
Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is as follows for the next five years: $28,172 in 2014 , $25,362 in 2015 , $20,750 in 2016 and $15,097 in 2017 and $13,324 in 2018 .

A summary of changes in the Company’s carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment is as follows:
Goodwill
Paint Stores
Group
 
Consumer
Group
 
Global
Finishes
Group
 
Latin America
Coatings Group
 
Consolidated
Totals
Balance at January 1, 2011 (a)
$
286,744

 
$
689,388

 
$
115,719

 
$
10,607

 
$
1,102,458

Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
5,039

 
 
 
5,039

Currency and other adjustments
254

 
(109
)
 
(408
)
 
774

 
511

Balance at December 31, 2011 (a)
286,998

 
689,279

 
120,350

 
11,381

 
1,108,008

Acquisitions
 
 
17,357

 
24,707

 
 
 
42,064

Currency and other adjustments
(214
)
 
(344
)
 
7,230

 
(739
)
 
5,933

Balance at December 31, 2012 (a)
286,784

 
706,292

 
152,287

 
10,642

 
1,156,005

Acquisitions
1,885

 
 
 
17,963

 
 
 
19,848

Currency and other adjustments
(1,369
)
 
(2,941
)
 
8,048

 
(904
)
 
2,834

Balance at December 31, 2013 (a)
$
287,300

 
$
703,351

 
$
178,298

 
$
9,738

 
$
1,178,687

(a)
Net of accumulated impairment losses of $8,904 ( $8,113 in the Consumer Group and $791 in the Global Finishes Group).
A summary of the Company’s carrying value of intangible assets is as follows: 
 
Finite-lived intangible assets
 
Trademarks
with indefinite
lives
 
Total
intangible
assets
 
Software
 
All other
 
Subtotal
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average amortization period
8 years

 
10 years

 
9 years

 
 
 
 
Gross
$
114,404

 
$
327,962

 
$
442,366

 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization
(77,018
)
 
(202,084
)
 
(279,102
)
 
 
 
 
Net value
$
37,386

 
$
125,878

 
$
163,264

 
$
150,035

 
$
313,299

December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average amortization period
8 years

 
12 years

 
11 years

 
 
 
 
Gross
$
107,779

 
$
337,089

 
$
444,868

 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization
(66,106
)
 
(193,959
)
 
(260,065
)
 
 
 
 
Net value
$
41,673

 
$
143,130

 
$
184,803

 
$
162,750

 
$
347,553

December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average amortization period
7 years

 
13 years

 
11 years

 
 
 
 
Gross
$
109,401

 
$
274,086

 
$
383,487

 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization
(60,030
)
 
(177,706
)
 
(237,736
)
 
 
 
 
Net value
$
49,371

 
$
96,380

 
$
145,751

 
$
160,122

 
$
305,873

NOTE 5 – EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES
Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities, including acquired operating facilities, against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational. Qualified exit costs primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the
 
contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated.


53

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

Concurrently, property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, and if impairment exists, the carrying value of the related assets is reduced to estimated fair value. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. Adjustments to prior provisions and additional impairment charges for property, plant and equipment of closed sites being held for disposal are recorded in Other general expense – net.
During 2013, 5 facilities and 16 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $1,004 , $598 , $278 and $123 were charged to the Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs and adjustments to prior provisions related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2013 of $2,679 were recorded.
During 2012, 19 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $7,363 and $313 were charged to the Global Finishes Group and Paint Stores Group, respectively. There were no provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs charged to the Consumer Group or Latin America Coatings Group. Adjustments to prior provisions related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2012 of $(4,942) were recorded.
 
During 2011, 22 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs of $913 , $339 and $182 were charged to the Global Finishes Group, Consumer Group and Paint Stores Group, respectively. There were no provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs charged to the Latin America Coatings Group. Adjustments to prior provisions related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2011 of $(900) were recorded. In 2011, a reduction of $3,263 in the carrying value of property, plant and equipment associated with a facility closed in 2008 was recorded in the Paint Stores Group.
At December 31, 2013 , a portion of the remaining accrual for qualified exit costs relating to facilities shutdown prior to 2011 is expected to be incurred by the end of 2014 . The remaining portion of the ending accrual for facilities shutdown prior to 2011 primarily represented post-closure contractual expenses related to certain owned facilities which are closed and being held for disposal or involved in ongoing environmental-related activities. The Company cannot reasonably estimate when such matters will be concluded to permit disposition.
The tables on the following pages summarize the activity and remaining liabilities associated with qualified exit costs:


Exit Plan
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
 
Provisions in
Cost of goods
sold or SG&A
 
Actual
expenditures
charged to
accrual
 
Adjustments to
prior provisions
in Other general
expense - net
 
Balance at
December 31,
2013
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
$
1,004

 
$
(27
)
 
 
 
$
977

Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
598

 
 
 
 
 
598

Global Finishes Group branches shutdown in 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
278

 
(25
)
 
 
 
253

Latin America Coatings Group facilities
shutdown in 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
123

 
 
 
 
 
123

Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
$
313

 
 
 
(68
)
 
$
(1
)
 
244

Global Finishes Group facilities shutdown in 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
2,236

 
2,533

 
(2,592
)
 
 
 
2,177

Other qualified exit costs
 
3,430

 
83

 
(3,530
)
 
100

 
83

Global Finishes Group branches shutdown in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
290

 
 
 
(222
)
 
 
 
68

Other qualified exit costs for facilities
shutdown prior to 2011
 
2,288

 
 
 
(955
)
 
(36
)
 
1,297

Totals
 
$
8,557

 
$
4,619

 
$
(7,419
)
 
$
63

 
$
5,820



54  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Exit Plan
 
Balance at
December 31,
2011
 
Provisions in
Cost of goods
sold or SG&A
 
Actual
expenditures
charged to
accrual
 
Adjustments to
prior provisions
in Other general
expense - net
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown
in 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
 
 
$
313

 
 
 
 
 
$
313

Global Finishes Group facility shutdown
in 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
3,933

 
$
(1,697
)
 
 
 
2,236

Other qualified exit costs
 
 
 
3,430

 
 
 
 
 
3,430

Consumer Group manufacturing facilities
shutdown in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
$
197

 
 
 
(133
)
 
$
(64
)
 
 
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown
in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
156

 
 
 
(144
)
 
(12
)
 
 
Global Finishes Group branches shutdown
in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
129

 
 
 
(134
)
 
5

 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
470

 
 
 
(180
)
 
 
 
290

Global Finishes Group branches shutdown
in 2010:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
955

 
 
 
(133
)
 
 
 
822

Other qualified exit costs for facilities
shutdown prior to 2010
 
8,493

 
 
 
(2,156
)
 
(4,871
)
 
1,466

Totals
 
$
10,400

 
$
7,676

 
$
(4,577
)
 
$
(4,942
)
 
$
8,557


Exit Plan
 
Balance at
January 1,
2011
 
Provisions in
Cost of goods
sold or SG&A
 
Actual
expenditures
charged to
accrual
 
Adjustments to
prior provisions
in Other general
expense - net
 
Balance at
December 31,
2011
Consumer Group manufacturing facilities
shutdown in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
$
339

 
$
(142
)
 
 
 
$
197

Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
 
 
182

 
(26
)
 
 
 
156

Global Finishes Group branches shutdown
in 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Severance and related costs
 
 
 
316

 
(187
)
 
 
 
129

Other qualified exit costs
 
 
 
597

 
(127
)
 
 
 
470

Global Finishes Group branches shutdown
in 2010:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
$
1,114

 
 
 
(159
)
 
 
 
955

Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2010:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
4

 
 
 
 
 
$
(4
)
 
 
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2009:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
2,022

 
 
 
(805
)
 
3

 
1,220

Global Finishes Group manufacturing facility
and branches shutdown in 2009:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
1,820

 
 
 
(918
)
 
262

 
1,164

Consumer Group manufacturing facilities
shutdown in 2009:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other qualified exit costs
 
721

 
 
 
(245
)
 
(74
)
 
402

Other qualified exit costs for facilities
shutdown prior to 2009
 
10,366

 
 
 
(3,572
)
 
(1,087
)
 
5,707

Totals
 
$
16,047

 
$
1,434

 
$
(6,181
)
 
$
(900
)
 
$
10,400

 

55

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

NOTE 6 – PENSION, HEALTH CARE AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees through primarily noncontributory defined contribution or defined benefit plans and certain health care and life insurance benefits to domestic active employees and eligible retirees. In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes an asset for overfunded defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans and a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. In addition, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs of such plans are recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension cost (credit) and net periodic benefit cost.
Health care plans. The Company provides certain domestic health care plans that are contributory and contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. There were 19,440 , 18,609 and 18,189 active employees entitled to receive benefits under these plans at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The cost of these benefits for active employees, which includes claims incurred and claims incurred but not reported, amounted to $174,588 , $163,011 and $155,501 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
Defined contribution pension plans. The Company’s annual contribution for its domestic defined contribution pension plan was $27,803 , $25,147 and $23,344 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The contribution percentage ranges from two percent to seven percent of compensation for covered employees based on an age and service formula. Assets in employee accounts of the domestic defined contribution pension plan are invested in various investment funds as directed by the participants. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.
The Company’s annual contribution for its foreign defined contribution pension plans, which is based on various percentages of compensation for covered employees up to certain limits, was $1,428 , $4,621 and $3,807 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Assets in employee accounts of the foreign defined contribution pension plans are invested in various investment funds. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.
Defined benefit pension plans. The Company has one salaried and one hourly domestic defined benefit pension plan, and twenty foreign defined benefit pension plans, including three Canadian plans acquired in connection with the 2013 acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business and one European plan acquired in connection with the 2011 acquisition of Leighs Paints. All participants in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan prior to January 1, 2002 retain the previous defined benefit formula for computing benefits with certain modifications for active employees.
 
Eligible domestic salaried employees hired or re-hired between January 1, 2002 and September 30, 2011 became participants in the revised domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan upon completion of six months of service. All employees who became participants on or after January 1, 2002 and before January 1, 2005 were credited with certain contribution credits equivalent to six percent of their salary. All employees who became participants on or after January 1, 2005 were credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised, and all employees who become participants on or after January 1, 2002 were credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Contribution credits are converted into units to account for each participant’s benefits. Participants will receive a variable annuity benefit upon retirement or a lump sum distribution upon termination (if vested). The variable annuity benefit is subject to the hypothetical returns achieved on each participant’s allocation of units from investments in various investment funds as directed by the participant. Contribution credits to the revised domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan are being funded through existing plan assets. Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan.
In connection with the 2013 acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business, the Company acquired a domestic defined benefit pension plan (Comex Plan). The Comex Plan was merged into the Company's salaried defined benefit pension plan as of November 29, 2013 and was frozen for new participants as of December 31, 2013. Accrued benefits and vesting service under the Comex Plan were credited under the Company's domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan.
At December 31, 2013 , the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plans were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $582,036 , fair value of plan assets of $870,386 and excess plan assets of $288,350 . The plans are funded in accordance with all applicable regulations at December 31, 2013 and no funding will be required in 2014 . At December 31, 2012, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $313,964 , fair value of plan assets of $559,552 and excess plan assets of $245,588 , and the domestic hourly defined benefit pension plan was underfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $152,863 , fair value of plan assets of $144,011 and a deficiency of plan assets of $8,852 . At December 31, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $269,314 , fair value of plan assets of $487,990 and excess plan assets of $218,676 , and the domestic hourly defined benefit pension plan was underfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $140,715 , fair value of plan assets of $126,473 and a deficiency of plan assets of $14,242 .


56  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

At December 31, 2013 , fifteen of the Company’s foreign defined benefit pension plans were unfunded or underfunded, with combined accumulated benefit obligations, projected benefit obligations, fair values of net assets and deficiencies of plan assets of $124,062 , $156,423 , $104,282 and $52,141 , respectively. An increase of $54,238 from 2012 in the combined projected benefit obligations of all foreign defined benefit pension plans was primarily due to the acquisition of three Canadian defined benefit pension plans in connection with the 2013 acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business and changes in plan assumptions.
The Company expects to make the following benefit payments for all domestic and foreign defined benefit pension
 
plans: $60,725 in 2014; $60,759 in 2015; $61,741 in 2016; $62,755 in 2017; $63,631 in 2018; and $289,290 in 2019 through 2023. The Company expects to contribute $8,130 to the foreign plans in 2014 .
The estimated net actuarial losses and prior service (credits) for the defined benefit pension plans that are expected to be amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into the net pension costs in 2014 are $1,423 and $1,837 , respectively.
The following table summarizes the components of the net pension costs and Cumulative other comprehensive loss related to the defined benefit pension plans:

 
Domestic
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
Foreign
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Net pension costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service costs
$
23,176

 
$
19,061

 
$
17,933

 
$
5,039

 
$
3,654

 
$
3,055

Interest costs
18,444

 
17,442

 
18,602

 
7,940

 
6,927

 
5,954

Expected returns on plan assets
(42,937
)
 
(44,841
)
 
(46,441
)
 
(7,487
)
 
(6,799
)
 
(5,535
)
Amortization of prior service costs
1,823

 
1,591

 
1,635

 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of actuarial losses
13,147

 
22,205

 
16,865

 
1,716

 
1,022

 
493

Ongoing pension costs
13,653

 
15,458

 
8,594

 
7,208

 
4,804

 
3,967

Settlement costs (credits)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(220
)
 
47

 
(235
)
Net pension costs
13,653

 
15,458

 
8,594

 
6,988

 
4,851

 
3,732

Other changes in plan assets and projected benefit
obligation recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial (gains) losses arising during the year
(90,669
)
 
(26,459
)
 
48,745

 
(5,487
)
 
14,131

 
15,944

Prior service costs during the year
1,756

 
2,495

 
1,195

 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service costs
(1,823
)
 
(1,591
)
 
(1,635
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of actuarial losses
(13,147
)
 
(22,205
)
 
(16,865
)
 
(1,716
)
 
(1,022
)
 
(493
)
Exchange rate gain (loss) recognized during year
 
 
 
 
 
 
819

 
1,464

 
(387
)
Total recognized in Cumulative other
comprehensive loss
(103,883
)
 
(47,760
)
 
31,440

 
(6,384
)
 
14,573

 
15,064

Total recognized in net pension costs
and Cumulative other comprehensive loss
$
(90,230
)
 
$
(32,302
)
 
$
40,034

 
$
604

 
$
19,424

 
$
18,796

The Company employs a total return investment approach for the domestic and foreign defined benefit pension plan assets. A mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of assets for a prudent level of risk. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on defined benefit pension plan assets,
 
management considers the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation of future investment strategies. The target allocations for plan assets are 45 65 percent equity securities and 30 40 percent fixed income securities.


57

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

The following tables summarize the fair value of the defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 :
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2013
 
Quoted Prices in 
Active Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable 
Inputs
(Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments (a)
$
15,055

 
$
1,941

 
$
13,114

 
 
Equity investments (b)
736,873

 
419,779

 
317,094

 
 
Fixed income investments (c)
255,927

 
125,377

 
130,550

 
 
Other assets (d)
47,494

 
 
 
29,553

 
$
17,941

 
$
1,055,349

 
$
547,097

 
$
490,311

 
$
17,941

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments (a)
$
68,795

 
 
 
$
68,795

 
 
Equity investments (b)
490,993

 
$
243,553

 
247,440

 
 
Fixed income investments (c)
239,558

 
131,276

 
108,282

 
 
Other assets (d)
37,230

 
 
 
18,380

 
$
18,850

 
$
836,576

 
$
374,829

 
$
442,897

 
$
18,850

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2011
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments (a)
$
9,408

 
 
 
$
9,408

 
 
Equity investments (b)
482,694

 
$
268,307

 
214,387

 
 
Fixed income investments (c)
202,939

 
103,485

 
99,454

 


Other assets (d)
37,482

 
 
 
16,582

 
$
20,900

 
$
732,523

 
$
371,792

 
$
339,831

 
$
20,900


(a)
This category includes a full range of high quality, short-term money market securities.
(b)
This category includes actively managed equity assets that track primarily to the S&P 500.
(c)
This category includes government and corporate bonds that track primarily to the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index.
(d)
This category consists of venture capital funds.
The following tables summarize the changes in the fair value of the defined benefit pension plan assets classified as level 3 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
 
Dispositions
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains
 
Balance at
December 31,
2013
Other assets
$
18,850

 
$
(4,068
)
 
$
3,159

 
$
17,941

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at
December 31,
2011
 
Dispositions
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
Other assets
$
20,900

 
$
(3,827
)
 
$
1,777

 
$
18,850

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at
January 1, 
2011
 
Dispositions
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains
 
Balance at
December 31,
2011
Fixed income investments
$
5,535

 
$
(5,717
)
 
$
182

 
 
Other assets
19,152

 
(1,389
)
 
3,137

 
$
20,900

 
$
24,687

 
$
(7,106
)
 
$
3,319

 
$
20,900


58  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Included as equity investments in the domestic defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 were 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value of $55,050 , representing 6.3 percent of total domestic plan assets. Dividends received on the Company’s common stock during 2013 totaled $600 .
The following table summarizes the obligations, plan assets and assumptions used for the defined benefit pension plans, which are all measured as of December 31:
 
Domestic
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
Foreign
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Accumulated benefit obligations
at end of year
$
577,736

 
$
460,591

 
$
415,163

 
$
187,670

 
$
142,769

 
$
121,137

Projected benefit obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances at beginning of year
$
466,827

 
$
410,029

 
$
390,257

 
$
168,758

 
$
141,465

 
$
85,936

Service costs
23,176

 
19,061

 
17,933

 
5,039

 
3,654

 
3,055

Interest costs
18,444

 
17,442

 
18,602

 
7,940

 
6,927

 
5,954

Actuarial (gains) losses
(5,488
)
 
48,346

 
8,428

 
5,939

 
17,532

 
11,395

Acquisitions of businesses and other
113,174

 
2,496

 
1,194

 
39,622

 
(975
)
 
42,131

Effect of foreign exchange
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,549

 
6,633

 
(3,760
)
Benefits paid
(34,097
)
 
(30,547
)
 
(26,385
)
 
(5,851
)
 
(6,478
)
 
(3,246
)
Balances at end of year
582,036

 
466,827

 
410,029

 
222,996

 
168,758

 
141,465

Plan assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances at beginning of year
703,563

 
614,463

 
634,725

 
133,013

 
118,060

 
65,748

Actual returns on plan assets
128,117

 
119,647

 
6,123

 
20,316

 
10,201

 
987

Acquisitions of businesses and other
72,803

 
 
 
 
 
36,106

 
6,205

 
57,761

Effect of foreign exchange
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,379

 
5,025

 
(3,190
)
Benefits paid
(34,097
)
 
(30,547
)
 
(26,385
)
 
(5,851
)
 
(6,478
)
 
(3,246
)
Balances at end of year
870,386

 
703,563

 
614,463

 
184,963

 
133,013

 
118,060

Excess (deficient) plan assets over
projected benefit obligations
$
288,350

 
$
236,736

 
$
204,434

 
$
(38,033
)
 
$
(35,745
)
 
$
(23,405
)
Assets and liabilities recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred pension assets
$
288,350

 
$
245,588

 
$
218,676

 
$
14,096

 
$
4,323

 
$
9,674

Other accruals
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,126
)
 
(869
)
 
(829
)
Other long-term liabilities
 
 
(8,852
)
 
(14,242
)
 
(51,003
)
 
(39,199
)
 
(32,250
)
 
$
288,350

 
$
236,736

 
$
204,434

 
$
(38,033
)
 
$
(35,745
)
 
$
(23,405
)
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other
comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial losses
$
(59,272
)
 
$
(163,088
)
 
$
(211,752
)
 
$
(35,183
)
 
$
(41,567
)
 
$
(26,994
)
Prior service costs
(6,043
)
 
(6,110
)
 
(5,206
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(65,315
)
 
$
(169,198
)
 
$
(216,958
)
 
$
(35,183
)
 
$
(41,567
)
 
$
(26,994
)
Weighted-average assumptions used to
determine projected benefit obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
4.65
%
 
3.73
%
 
4.40
%
 
4.89
%
 
4.58
%
 
4.94
%
Rate of compensation increase
4.00
%
 
4.00
%
 
4.00
%
 
4.31
%
 
4.08
%
 
4.05
%
Weighted-average assumptions used to
determine net pension costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
3.73
%
 
4.40
%
 
4.97
%
 
4.58
%
 
4.94
%
 
5.48
%
Expected long-term rate of
return on assets
6.00
%
 
7.50
%
 
7.50
%
 
5.67
%
 
6.04
%
 
6.12
%
Rate of compensation increase
4.00
%
 
4.00
%
 
4.00
%
 
4.08
%
 
4.04
%
 
4.06
%
 

59

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Employees of the Company hired in the United States prior to January 1, 1993 who are not members of a collective bargaining unit, and certain groups of employees added through acquisitions, are eligible for health care and life
 
insurance benefits upon retirement, subject to the terms of the unfunded plans. There were 4,419 , 4,402 and 4,436 retired employees entitled to receive such postretirement benefits at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.


The following table summarizes the obligation and the assumptions used for postretirement benefits other than pensions:
 
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Benefit obligation:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year - unfunded
$
338,134

 
$
316,795

 
$
315,572

Service cost
3,061

 
2,943

 
3,495

Interest cost
12,183

 
13,520

 
15,580

Actuarial (gain) loss
(53,096
)
 
18,961

 
(3,965
)
Benefits paid
(13,631
)
 
(14,085
)
 
(13,887
)
Balance at end of year - unfunded
$
286,651

 
$
338,134

 
$
316,795

Liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
$
(268,874
)
 
$
(320,223
)
 
$
(297,528
)
Other accruals
(17,777
)
 
(17,911
)
 
(19,267
)
 
$
(286,651
)
 
$
(338,134
)
 
$
(316,795
)
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial losses
$
(8,287
)
 
$
(62,814
)
 
$
(45,567
)
Prior service costs
2,503

 
328

 
983

 
$
(5,784
)
 
$
(62,486
)
 
$
(44,584
)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
4.60
%
 
3.70
%
 
4.40
%
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65
7.50
%
 
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
Health care cost trend rate - post-65
6.50
%
 
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
Prescription drug cost increases
7.00
%
 
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate
3.70
%
 
4.40
%
 
5.10
%
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
 
7.50
%
Health care cost trend rate - post-65
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
 
7.50
%
Prescription drug cost increases
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
 
8.00
%
The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic benefit cost and cumulative other comprehensive loss related to postretirement benefits other than pensions:
 
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Net periodic benefit cost:
 
 
 
 
 
Service cost
$
3,061

 
$
2,943

 
$
3,495

Interest cost
12,183

 
13,520

 
15,580

Amortization of actuarial losses
3,934

 
1,715

 
2,505

Amortization of prior service credit
(328
)
 
(656
)
 
(657
)
Net periodic benefit cost
18,850

 
17,522

 
20,923

Other changes in projected benefit obligation recognized in
Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes):
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial (gain) loss
(53,096
)
 
18,961

 
(3,965
)
Amortization of actuarial losses
(3,934
)
 
(1,715
)
 
(2,505
)
Amortization of prior service credit
328

 
656

 
657

Total recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss
(56,702
)
 
17,902

 
(5,813
)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and
Cumulative other comprehensive loss
$
(37,852
)
 
$
35,424

 
$
15,110


60  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)


The estimated prior service credit for postretirement benefits other than pensions that is expected to be amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2014 is $(503) .
The assumed health care cost trend rate and prescription drug cost increases used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for postretirement health care benefits for 2014 both decrease in each successive year until reaching 5.0 percent in 2022 . The assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement health care benefit obligation. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates would have had the following effects at December 31, 2013 :
 
One-Percentage-Point
 
Increase
 
(Decrease)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
$
148

 
$
(158
)
Effect on the postretirement benefit obligation
$
2,953

 
$
(3,120
)
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) introduced a
 
prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In accordance with the accounting guidance related to the Medicare Act included in the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the effects of the federal subsidy resulted in a $21,400 reduction of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for benefits attributed to past service, which was recognized prospectively beginning July 1, 2004. During 2012, this recognition resulted in a $5,712 reduction of the net periodic benefit cost, which consisted of changes in actuarial experience and reductions in interest cost of $5,278 and $434 , respectively. During 2011, this recognition resulted in a $7,073 reduction of the net periodic benefit cost, which consisted of changes in actuarial experience and reductions in interest cost of $6,831 and $242 , respectively. There is no expense impact in years after 2012 due to the elimination of the tax deduction previously allowed for the Medicare Part D subsidy.
The Company expects to make retiree health care benefit cash payments and to receive Medicare Part D prescription cash reimbursements as follows:

 
Retiree Health
Care Benefits
 
Medicare Prescription
Reimbursement
 
Expected Cash
Payments - Net
2014
$
19,119

 
$
(1,342
)
 
$
17,777

2015
20,395

 
(1,511
)
 
18,884

2016
21,396

 
(1,680
)
 
19,716

2017
22,260

 
 
 
22,260

2018
22,606

 
 
 
22,606

2019 through 2023
109,636

 
 
 
109,636

Total expected benefit cash payments
$
215,412

 
$
(4,533
)
 
$
210,879

NOTE 7 – DEBT
Long-term debt
 
Due Date
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
1.35% Senior Notes
2017
 
$
699,277

 
$
699,091

 
 
4.00% Senior Notes
2042
 
298,545

 
298,493

 
 
7.375% Debentures
2027
 
119,366

 
129,060

 
$
129,056

7.45% Debentures
2097
 
3,500

 
3,500

 
3,500

2.00% to 2.02% Promissory Notes
Through 2023
 
1,685

 
2,109

 
6,808

3.125% Senior Notes
2014
 
 
 
499,912

 
499,867

 
 
 
$
1,122,373

 
$
1,632,165

 
$
639,231

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows for the next five years: $502,991 in 2014; $355 in 2015; $217 in 2016; $700,150 in 2017 and $153 in 2018. Interest expense on long-term debt was $57,949 , $36,188 and $31,883 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
Among other restrictions, the Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain certain covenants relating to liens, ratings changes, merger and sale of assets, consolidated leverage and change of control as defined in the agreements. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of
 
these borrowings may result. The Company was in compliance with all covenants for all years presented.


61

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

On December 4, 2012, the Company issued $700,000 of 1.35% Senior Notes due 2017 and $300,000 of 4.00% Senior Notes due 2042. The Senior Notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 16, 2009. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of short-term borrowings and financing acquisitions.
Short-term borrowings. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program. At December 31, 2011, borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program totaled $264,902 and were included in Short-term borrowings. The weighted-average interest rate related to these borrowings was 0.2% at December 31, 2011. Borrowings outstanding under various foreign programs of $96,551 , $69,035 and $81,375 at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were included in Short-term borrowings. The weighted-average interest rate related to these borrowings was 7.8% , 2.8% and 4.9% at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
On September 19, 2012, Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a €95,000 (Euro) five -year revolving credit facility. This facility replaced the existing €97,000 (Euro) credit facility. On June 29, 2012, Sherwin-Williams Canada Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a new CAD 75,000 five -year credit facility which replaced the existing credit facility. On March 18, 2013, the aggregate amount of this credit facility was increased to CAD 150,000 . These credit facilities are being used for general corporate purposes, including refinancing indebtedness and for acquisitions.
On January 30, 2012, the Company entered into a five -year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit of up to an aggregate availability of $500,000 . On April 23, 2012, the Company entered into a five -year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000 . On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into a three -year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000 . The three credit agreements entered into in 2012 replace prior credit facilities that matured in 2012 and 2011. At December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , there were no borrowings outstanding under any of these credit agreements.
The Company uses a revolving credit agreement primarily to satisfy its commercial paper program’s dollar for dollar liquidity requirement. On July 8, 2011, the Company entered into a new five -year $1.05 billion revolving credit agreement, which replaced the existing three -year $500,000 credit agreement. The new credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one -year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to
 
$1.30 billion , both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender.
NOTE 8 – OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in our industry, are subject to various domestic and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.
The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites (including sites which were previously owned and/or operated by businesses acquired by the Company). In addition, the Company, together with other parties, has been designated a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental protection laws for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination and hazardous waste at a number of third-party sites, primarily Superfund sites. In general, these laws provide that potentially responsible parties may be held jointly and severally liable for investigation and remediation costs regardless of fault. The Company may be similarly designated with respect to additional third-party sites in the future.
The Company initially provides for estimated costs of environmental-related activities relating to its past operations and third-party sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are determined based on currently available facts regarding each site. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is provided. The Company continuously assesses its potential liability for investigation and remediation-related activities and adjusts its environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Included in Other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were accruals for extended environmental-related activities of $86,647 , $97,220 and $89,266 , respectively. Included in Other accruals at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were accruals for estimated costs of current investigation and remediation activities of $15,385 , $17,101 and $42,847 , respectively.


62  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Actual costs incurred may vary from the accrued estimates due to the inherent uncertainties involved including, among others, the number and financial condition of parties involved with respect to any given site, the volumetric contribution which may be attributed to the Company relative to that attributed to other parties, the nature and magnitude of the wastes involved, the various technologies that can be used for remediation and the determination of acceptable remediation with respect to a particular site. If the Company’s future loss contingency is ultimately determined to be at the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes for every site for which costs can be reasonably estimated, the Company’s accrual for environmental-related activities would be $87,074 higher than the minimum accruals at December 31, 2013 .
Two of the Company’s currently and formerly owned manufacturing sites account for the majority of the accrual for environmental-related activities and the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes at December 31, 2013 . At December 31, 2013 , $56,921 , or 55.9 percent of the total accrual, related directly to these two sites. In the aggregate unaccrued maximum of $87,074 at December 31, 2013 , $59,245 , or 68.0 percent , related to the two manufacturing sites. While environmental investigations and remedial actions are in different stages at these sites, additional investigations, remedial actions and monitoring will likely be required at each site.
Management cannot presently estimate the ultimate potential loss contingencies related to these sites or other less significant sites until such time as a substantial portion of the investigation at the sites is completed and remedial action plans are developed. In the event any future loss contingency significantly exceeds the current amount accrued, the recording of the ultimate liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the additional costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its environmental-related matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time during which environmental investigation and remediation takes place. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
Management expects these contingent environmental-related liabilities to be resolved over an extended period of time. Management is unable to provide a more specific time frame due to the indefinite amount of time to conduct investigation activities at any site, the indefinite amount of time to obtain environmental agency approval, as necessary, with respect to investigation and remediation activities, and the indefinite amount of time necessary to conduct remediation activities.
The Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Topic of the ASC requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if a settlement date and fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes a liability for any conditional asset retirement obligation when sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate a settlement date to determine the fair value of such a liability. The Company has identified certain conditional asset
 
retirement obligations at various current and closed manufacturing, distribution and store facilities. These obligations relate primarily to asbestos abatement, hazardous waste Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closures, well abandonment, transformers and used oil disposals and underground storage tank closures. Using investigative, remediation and disposal methods that are currently available to the Company, the estimated costs of these obligations were accrued and are not significant. The recording of additional liabilities for future conditional asset retirement obligations may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its conditional asset retirement obligations will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time over which sufficient information may become available regarding the closure or modification of any one or group of the Company’s facilities. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
NOTE 9 – LITIGATION
In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the Company. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, the Company accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred.


63

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

Lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. The Company’s past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The Company, along with other companies, is and has been a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs’ claims have been based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. The Company is also a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints that seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. The Company believes that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending such litigation. The Company has not settled any lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation. The Company expects that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against the Company in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.
Notwithstanding the Company’s views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and the Company ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against the Company and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which the Company and other manufacturers have been successful.
Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings, or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against the Company. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or resulting from any such legislation and regulations. The Company has not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not
 
possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from any changes to legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
Public nuisance claim litigation . The Company and other companies are or were defendants in legal proceedings seeking recovery based on public nuisance liability theories, among other theories, brought by the State of Rhode Island, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, various cities and counties in the State of New Jersey, various cities in the State of Ohio and the State of Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the County of Santa Clara, California and other public entities in the State of California. Except for the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, all of these legal proceedings have been concluded in favor of the Company and other defendants at various stages in the proceedings.


64  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

The proceedings initiated by the State of Rhode Island included two jury trials. At the conclusion of the second trial, the jury returned a verdict finding that (i) the cumulative presence of lead pigment in paints and coatings on buildings in the State of Rhode Island constitutes a public nuisance, (ii) the Company, along with two other defendants, caused or substantially contributed to the creation of the public nuisance, and (iii) the Company and two other defendants should be ordered to abate the public nuisance. The Company and two other defendants appealed and, on July 1, 2008, the Rhode Island Supreme Court, among other determinations, reversed the judgment of abatement with respect to the Company and two other defendants. The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision reversed the public nuisance liability judgment against the Company on the basis that the complaint failed to state a public nuisance claim as a matter of law.
The Santa Clara County, California proceeding was initiated in March 2000 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted various claims including fraud and concealment, strict product liability/failure to warn, strict product liability/design defect, negligence, negligent breach of a special duty, public nuisance, private nuisance, and violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. A number of the asserted claims were resolved in favor of the defendants through pre-trial proceedings. The named plaintiffs in the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on March 16, 2011, are the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano and Ventura, and the Cities of Oakland and San Diego and the City and County of San Francisco. The Fourth Amended Complaint asserted a sole claim for public nuisance, alleging that the presence of lead pigments for use in paint and coatings in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions constitutes a public nuisance. The plaintiffs sought the abatement of the alleged public nuisance that exists within the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions. A trial commenced on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants (ConAgra Grocery Products Company and NL Industries, Inc.). The final judgment held the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company strongly disagrees with the judgment. The Company has filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment, and will file a notice of appeal at the appropriate time. The Company believes that the judgment conflicts with established principles of law and is unsupported by the evidence. The Company has had a favorable history with respect to lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, particularly other public nuisance litigation, and accordingly, the Company believes that it is not probable that a loss has occurred and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential loss with respect to the case.
Litigation seeking damages from alleged personal injury . The Company and other companies are defendants in a number of legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief from alleged personal injuries. These proceedings include claims by children allegedly injured from ingestion of lead pigment or lead-containing paint, claims for damages allegedly incurred by
 
the children’s parents or guardians, and claims for damages allegedly incurred by professional painting contractors. These proceedings generally seek compensatory and punitive damages, and seek other relief including medical monitoring costs. These proceedings include purported claims by individuals, groups of individuals and class actions.
The plaintiff in Thomas v. Lead Industries Association, et al., initiated an action in state court against the Company, other alleged former lead pigment manufacturers and the Lead Industries Association in September 1999. The claims against the Company and the other defendants included strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentation and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy and enterprise liability. Implicit within these claims is the theory of “risk contribution” liability (Wisconsin’s theory which is similar to market share liability) due to the plaintiff’s inability to identify the manufacturer of any product that allegedly injured the plaintiff. The case ultimately proceeded to trial and, on November 5, 2007, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the plaintiff had ingested white lead carbonate, but was not brain damaged or injured as a result. The plaintiff appealed and, on December 16, 2010, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the final judgment in favor of the Company and other defendants.
Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction to date to apply a theory of liability with respect to alleged personal injury (i.e., risk contribution/market share liability) that does not require the plaintiff to identify the manufacturer of the product that allegedly injured the plaintiff in the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Although the risk contribution liability theory was applied during the Thomas trial, the constitutionality of this theory as applied to the lead pigment cases has not been judicially determined by the Wisconsin state courts. However, in an unrelated action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., on November 15, 2010, the District Court held that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory as applied in that case violated the defendants’ right to substantive due process and is unconstitutionally retroactive. The District Court's decision in Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., has been appealed by the plaintiff.


65

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

Insurance coverage litigation . The Company and its liability insurers, including certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, initiated legal proceedings against each other to primarily determine, among other things, whether the costs and liabilities associated with the abatement of lead pigment are covered under certain insurance policies issued to the Company. The Company’s action, filed on March 3, 2006 in the Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is currently stayed and inactive. The liability insurers’ action, which was filed on February 23, 2006 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has been dismissed. An ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation would mean that insurance proceeds could be unavailable under the policies at issue to mitigate any ultimate abatement related costs and liabilities. The Company has not recorded any assets related to these insurance policies or otherwise assumed that proceeds from these insurance policies would be received in estimating any contingent liability accrual. Therefore, an ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation without a determination of liability against the Company in the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation will have no impact on the Company’s results of operation, liquidity or financial condition. As previously stated, however, the Company has not accrued any amounts for the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation and any significant liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued.

Department of Labor (DOL) leveraged ESOP settlement. As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, on February 20, 2013, the Company reached a settlement with the DOL of the DOL's investigation of transactions related to the Company's ESOP that were implemented on August 1, 2006 and August 27, 2003. The DOL had notified the Company, among others, of potential enforcement claims asserting breaches of fiduciary obligations and sought compensatory and equitable remedies. The Company resolved all ESOP related claims with the DOL by agreeing, in part, to make a one-time payment of $80,000 to the ESOP, resulting in a $49,163 after tax charge to earnings in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company
 
made this required $80,000 payment to the ESOP during the first quarter of 2013.

Government tax assessment settlements related to Brazilian operations. Charges of $28,711 and $2,873 were recorded to Cost of goods sold and SG&A, respectively, during 2013. The charges were primarily related to import duty taxes paid to the Brazilian government related to the handling of import duties on products brought into the country for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company elected to pay the taxes through an existing voluntary amnesty program offered by the government to resolve these issues rather than contest them in court. The after-tax charges were $21,858 for the year. The Company's import duty process in Brazil was changed to reach a final resolution of this matter with the Brazilian government.
NOTE 10 – CAPITAL STOCK
At December 31, 2013 , there were 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 30,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock authorized for issuance. Of the authorized serial preferred stock, 3,000,000 shares are designated as cumulative redeemable serial preferred and 1,000,000 shares are designated as convertible serial preferred stock. See Note 11 . Under the amended and restated 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (2006 Employee Plan), 19,200,000 common shares may be issued or transferred. See Note 12 . An aggregate of 12,121,210 , 13,558,565 and 18,013,429 shares of common stock at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, were reserved for future grants of restricted stock and the exercise and future grants of option rights. See Note 12 . Common shares outstanding shown in the following table included 486,138 , 484,872 and 475,628 shares of common stock held in a revocable trust at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The revocable trust is used to accumulate assets for the purpose of funding the ultimate obligation of certain non-qualified benefit plans. Transactions between the Company and the trust are accounted for in accordance with the Deferred Compensation – Rabbi Trusts Subtopic of the Compensation Topic of the ASC, which requires the assets held by the trust be consolidated with the Company’s accounts. Effective March 31, 2011, the company retired 125,425,977 common shares held in treasury, which resulted in decreases in Treasury stock, common stock and retained earnings.

 

66  

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

 
Common Shares
in Treasury
 
Common Shares
Outstanding
Balance at January 1, 2011
124,324,862

 
107,020,728

Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised
2,274

 
(2,274
)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights
 
 
1,480,058

Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock
 
 
55,722

Treasury stock purchased
4,700,000

 
(4,700,000
)
Treasury stock retired
(125,425,977
)
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2011
3,601,159

 
103,854,234

Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised
7,766

 
(7,766
)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights
 
 
4,140,822

Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock
143,979

 
(143,979
)
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock
 
 
26,756

Treasury stock purchased
4,600,000

 
(4,600,000
)
Balance at December 31, 2012
8,352,904

 
103,270,067

Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised
2,697

 
(2,697
)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights
 
 
1,127,942

Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock
116,897

 
(116,897
)
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock
 
 
150,965

Treasury stock purchased
4,300,000

 
(4,300,000
)
Balance at December 31, 2013
12,772,498

 
100,129,380

NOTE 11 – STOCK PURCHASE PLAN AND PREFERRED STOCK
As of December 31, 2013 , 32,154 employees contributed to the Company’s ESOP, a voluntary defined contribution plan available to all eligible salaried employees. Participants are allowed to contribute, on a pretax or after-tax basis, up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. Prior to July 1, 2009, the Company matched one hundred percent of all contributions up to six percent of eligible employee contributions. Effective July 1, 2009, the ESOP was amended to change the Company match to one hundred percent on the first three percent of eligible employee contributions and fifty percent on the next two percent of eligible contributions. Effective July 1, 2011, the ESOP was amended to reinstate the Company match up to six percent of eligible employee contributions. Such participant contributions may be invested in a variety of investment funds or a Company common stock fund and may be exchanged between investments as directed by the participant. Participants are permitted to diversify both future and prior Company matching contributions previously allocated to the Company common stock fund into a variety of investment funds.
The Company made contributions to the ESOP on behalf of participating employees, representing amounts authorized by employees to be withheld from their earnings, of $97,381 , $88,363 and $79,266 in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $67,428 , $142,791 and $48,816 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The 2012 Company contributions include $80,000 related to the DOL Settlement. See Note 9 for additional information on the DOL Settlement.
 
At December 31, 2013 , there were 13,609,442 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 13.6 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. Shares of Company common stock credited to each member’s account under the ESOP are voted by the trustee under instructions from each individual plan member. Shares for which no instructions are received are voted by the trustee in the same proportion as those for which instructions are received.
On August 1, 2006, the Company issued 500,000 shares of convertible serial preferred stock, no par value (Series 2 Preferred stock) with cumulative quarterly dividends of $11.25 per share, for $500,000 to the ESOP. The ESOP financed the acquisition of the Series 2 Preferred stock by borrowing $500,000 from the Company at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum. This borrowing is payable over ten years in equal quarterly installments. Each share of Series 2 Preferred stock is entitled to one vote upon all matters presented to the Company’s shareholders and generally votes with the common stock together as one class. The Series 2 Preferred stock is held by the ESOP in an unallocated account. As the value of compensation expense related to contributions to the ESOP is earned, the Company has the option of funding the ESOP by redeeming a portion of the preferred stock or with cash. Contributions are credited to the members’ accounts at the time of funding. The Series 2 Preferred stock is redeemable for cash or convertible into common stock or any combination thereof at the option of the ESOP based on the relative fair value of the Series 2 Preferred and common stock at the time of conversion.


67  

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

At December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , there were no allocated or committed-to-be released shares of Series 2 Preferred stock outstanding. In 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the Company redeemed 60,681 , 59,187 and 56,480 shares of the Series 2 Preferred stock for cash, respectively. The fair value of the Series 2 Preferred stock is based on a conversion/redemption formula outlined in the preferred stock terms and was $86,309 , $210,773 and $328,495 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 respectively.
NOTE 12 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The amended and restated 2006 Employee Plan authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 19,200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or canceled. The Employee Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units to eligible employees. At December 31, 2013 , no appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units had been granted under the 2006 Employee Plan.
The 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (Nonemployee Director Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or are canceled. The Nonemployee Director Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company. At December 31, 2013 , no option rights, appreciation rights or restricted stock units had been granted under the Nonemployee Director Plan.
The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The tax benefits associated with these share-based payments are classified as financing activities in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
At December 31, 2013 , the Company had total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $74,702 that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.24 years. Stock-based compensation expense during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $58,004 , $54,348 and $48,176 , respectively. The Company recognized a total income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense of $22,368 , $20,948 and $18,570 during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The impact of total stock-based compensation expense, net of taxes, on net income reduced Basic and Diluted net income per common share by $.35 and $.34 during 2013 , respectively.
Option rights. The fair value of the Company’s option rights was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for all options granted:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Risk-free interest rate
1.37%
 
.78%
 
1.13%
Expected life of option rights
5.10 years
 
5.11 years
 
5.27 years
Expected dividend yield
of stock
1.32%
 
1.43%
 
1.77%
Expected volatility of stock
.281
 
.274
 
.303
The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant. The expected life of option rights was calculated using a scenario analysis model. Historical data was used to aggregate the holding period from actual exercises, post-vesting cancellations and hypothetical assumed exercises on all outstanding option rights. The expected dividend yield of stock is the Company’s best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. Expected volatility of stock was calculated using historical and implied volatilities. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 2.60 percent to the 2013 grants. This rate was calculated based upon historical activity and is an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from the expected rate, the Company may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods.
Grants of option rights for non-qualified and incentive stock options have been awarded to certain officers, key employees and nonemployee directors under the 2006 Employee Plan, the 2003 Stock Plan and the 1997 Plan. The option rights generally become exercisable to the extent of one-third of the optioned shares for each full year following the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to option rights granted to eligible employees amounted to $43,575 at December 31, 2013 . The unrecognized compensation expense is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three -year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.34 years.
The weighted-average per share grant date fair value of options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, was $41.91 , $32.74 and $18.47 . The total intrinsic value of exercised option rights for employees was $129,742 , $298,883 and $53,100 , and for nonemployee directors was $525 , $1,412 and $1,129 during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The total fair value of options vested during the year was $28,658 , $25,879 and $25,868 during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. There were no outstanding option rights for nonemployee directors for 2013 . The outstanding option rights for nonemployee directors were 3,500 and 17,500 for 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The Company issues new shares upon exercise of option rights or granting of restricted stock.


68  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

A summary of the Company’s non-qualified and incentive stock option right activity for employees and nonemployee directors, and related information for the years ended December 31 is shown in the following table:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
Optioned
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Optioned
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Optioned
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding beginning
of year
6,748,126

 
$
79.39

 
 
 
9,857,695

 
$
60.31

 
 
 
10,009,385

 
$
55.82

 
 
Granted
898,728

 
179.67

 
 
 
1,089,240

 
152.93

 
 
 
1,407,259

 
78.72

 
 
Exercised
(1,127,942
)
 
61.46

 
 
 
(4,140,822
)
 
53.40

 
 
 
(1,480,058
)
 
47.15

 
 
Forfeited
(33,278
)
 
115.24

 
 
 
(57,730
)
 
78.01

 
 
 
(76,354
)
 
67.02

 
 
Expired
(1,042
)
 
79.73

 
 
 
(257
)
 
72.65

 
 
 
(2,537
)
 
53.65

 
 
Outstanding end of year
6,484,592

 
$
96.25

 
$
563,554

 
6,748,126

 
$
79.39

 
$
494,699

 
9,857,695

 
$
60.31

 
$
287,526

Exercisable at end of year
4,424,674

 
$
71.86

 
$
492,689

 
4,245,891

 
$
61.43

 
$
386,484

 
6,908,116

 
$
54.24

 
$
243,440

 
The weighted-average remaining term for options outstanding at the end of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, was 6.75 , 6.99 and 6.54 years. The weighted-average remaining term for options exercisable at the end of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, was 5.71 , 5.79 and 5.39 years. Shares reserved for future grants of option rights and restricted stock were 5,636,618 , 6,810,439 and 8,155,734 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
Restricted stock. Grants of restricted stock, which generally require three years of continuous employment from the date of grant before vesting and receiving the stock without restriction, have been awarded to certain officers and key employees under the 2006 Employee Plan. The February 2013, 2012 and 2011 grants consisted of approximately two-thirds performance-based awards and one-third time-based awards. The performance-based awards vest at the end of a three -year period based on the Company’s achievement of specified financial goals relating to earnings per share. The time-based awards vest at the end of a three -year period based on continuous employment. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock to eligible employees amounted to $29,944 at December 31, 2013 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.96 years.
Grants of restricted stock have been awarded to nonemployee directors under the Nonemployee Plan and the 1997 Plan. These grants generally vest and stock is received without restriction to the extent of one-third of the granted stock for each year following the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock to nonemployee directors amounted to $1,182 at December 31, 2013 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three -year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.22 years.
 
A summary of grants of restricted stock to certain officers, key employees and nonemployee directors during each year is as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Restricted stock granted
172,406

 
301,856

 
300,677

Weighted-average per share
fair value of restricted stock
granted during the year
$
163.63

 
$
99.47

 
$
84.86


A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31 is shown in the following table:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Outstanding at beginning
of year
919,748

 
1,304,891

 
1,266,201

Granted
172,406

 
301,856

 
300,677

Vested
(334,750
)
 
(412,859
)
 
(16,072
)
Forfeited
(8,022
)
 
(274,140
)
 
(245,915
)
Outstanding at end of year
749,382

 
919,748

 
1,304,891

NOTE 13 – OTHER
Other general expense - net. Included in Other general expense - net were the following:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Provisions for environmental
matters - net
$
(2,751
)
 
$
6,736

 
$
9,100

Loss (gain) on disposition
of assets
5,207

 
3,454

 
(5,469
)
Net expense (income) of exit
or disposal activities
63

 
(4,942
)
 
(900
)
Total
$
2,519

 
$
5,248

 
$
2,731

Provisions for environmental matters–net represent initial provisions for site-specific estimated costs of environmental investigation or remediation and increases or decreases to


69

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Environmental-related accruals are not recorded net of insurance proceeds in accordance with the Offsetting Subtopic of the Balance Sheet Topic of the ASC. See Note 8 for further details on the Company’s environmental-related activities.
The loss (gain) on disposition of assets represents net realized gains and losses associated with the disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets previously used in the conduct of the primary business of the Company.
The net expense (income) of exit or disposal activities includes changes to accrued qualified exit costs as information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated, initial impairments of carrying value and additional impairments for subsequent reductions in estimated fair value of property, plant and equipment held for disposal. See Note 5 for further details on the Company’s exit or disposal activities. 
Other expense (income) - net . Included in Other expense (income) - net were the following:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Dividend and royalty income
$
(5,904
)
 
$
(4,666
)
 
$
(4,963
)
Net expense from
financing activities
9,829

 
9,220

 
8,023

Foreign currency transaction
related losses (gains)
7,669

 
(3,071
)
 
4,748

Other income
(22,684
)
 
(21,074
)
 
(22,167
)
Other expense
12,026

 
9,651

 
9,550

Total
$
936

 
$
(9,940
)
 
$
(4,809
)
The Net expense from financing activities includes the net expense relating to changes in the Company’s financing fees.
Foreign currency transaction related losses (gains) represent net realized losses (gains) on U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and net realized and unrealized losses (gains) from foreign currency option and forward contracts. There were no foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
Other income and Other expense included items of revenue, gains, expenses and losses that were unrelated to the primary business purpose of the Company. There were no items within Other income or Other expense that were individually significant.
NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using the enacted tax rates and laws that are currently in effect. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Exit costs, environ-mental and other
similar items
$
45,322

 
$
45,403

 
$
53,928

Deferred employee
benefit items
32,600

 
93,039

 
74,577

Other items (each
less than 5 percent
of total assets)
53,727

 
73,388

 
83,192

Total deferred
tax assets
$
131,649

 
$
211,830

 
$
211,697

Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and
amortization
$
214,696

 
$
202,891

 
$
192,035

Netted against the Company’s other deferred tax assets were valuation allowances of $7,390 , $11,474 and $8,017 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. These reserves resulted from the uncertainty as to the realization of the tax benefits from foreign net operating losses and other foreign assets. The Company has $17,294 of domestic net operating loss carryforwards acquired through acquisitions that have expiration dates through the tax year 2032 and foreign net operating losses of $71,541 . The foreign net operating losses are related to various jurisdictions that provide for both indefinite carryforward periods and others with carryforward periods that range from the tax years 2018 to 2033.
Significant components of the provisions for income taxes were as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
$
229,997

 
$
207,791

 
$
204,284

Foreign
42,543

 
51,264

 
50,272

State and local
33,082

 
27,642

 
28,219

Total current
305,622

 
286,697

 
282,775

Deferred:
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
30,384

 
8,692

 
20,713

Foreign
(9,041
)
 
(16,964
)
 
(3,922
)
State and local
6,432

 
(2,150
)
 
122

Total deferred
27,775

 
(10,422
)
 
16,913

Total provisions for
income taxes
$
333,397

 
$
276,275

 
$
299,688

The provisions for income taxes included estimated taxes payable on that portion of retained earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be received by the Company. The effect of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and the provisions of the Income Taxes Topic of the ASC, was $4,411 in 2013 , $7,572 in 2012 and $(491) in 2011 . A provision was not made with respect to $7,014 of retained earnings at December 31, 2013 that have been invested by foreign subsidiaries. The unrecognized deferred tax liability related to those earnings is approximately $1,294 .


70  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Significant components of income before income taxes as used for income tax purposes, were as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Domestic
$
969,790

 
$
712,873

 
$
560,395

Foreign
116,168

 
194,436

 
181,153

 
$
1,085,958

 
$
907,309

 
$
741,548

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate follows: 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Statutory federal
income tax rate
35.0
 %
 
35.0
 %
 
35.0
 %
Effect of:
 
 
 
 
 
State and local
income taxes
2.4

 
1.8

 
2.1

Investment vehicles
(2.1
)
 
(2.1
)
 
(1.9
)
ESOP IRS audit
settlement


 

 
10.1

Domestic production
activities
(2.2
)
 
(1.9
)
 
(2.4
)
Other - net
(2.4
)
 
(2.4
)
 
(2.5
)
Effective tax rate
30.7
 %
 
30.4
 %
 
40.4
 %
The 2013 state and local income tax component of the effective tax rate increased compared to 2012 primarily due to an increase in domestic income before income taxes in 2013 compared to 2012. The 2013 investment vehicles and domestic production activities components of the effective tax rate were consistent with the 2012 year. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company reached a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that resolved all ESOP related tax issues for the 2003 through 2009 tax years. The settlement negatively impacted the effective tax rate for 2011.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS commenced an examination of the Company's U.S. income tax returns for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years in the fourth quarter of 2013. Fieldwork is expected to be completed during 2014. At this time, the Company has determined that an insignificant refund is due for issues under review during this audit period. The IRS completed an examination of the Company's U.S. income tax returns for the 2008 and 2009 tax years in the third quarter of 2013. The audit adjustments had an insignificant impact on the Company's 2013 effective tax rate. The Company has fully resolved all IRS issues relating to the matters challenging the ESOP related federal
 
income tax deductions claimed by the Company. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company made a final interest payment of $1,991 related to the 2008 ESOP adjustment which had been disclosed in prior years.
As of December 31, 2013 , the Company is subject to non-U.S. income tax examinations for the tax years of 2006 through 2013. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2003 through 2013.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Balance at beginning
of year
$
28,119

 
$
29,666

 
$
31,268

Additions based on
tax positions related
to the current year
3,480

 
3,760

 
2,807

Additions for tax
positions of prior
years
5,059

 
7,392

 
1,354

Reductions for tax
positions of prior
years
(3,378
)
 
(6,583
)
 
(3,339
)
Settlements
(103
)
 
(1,139
)
 
(1,089
)
Lapses of Statutes
of Limitations
(2,180
)
 
(4,977
)
 
(1,335
)
Balance at end of year
$
30,997

 
$
28,119

 
$
29,666

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 is $27,767 , $25,011 and $25,569 in unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of which would have an effect on the effective tax rate.
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013 is $5,551 related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits comprised primarily of items related to federal audits of partnership investments, assessed state income tax audits, federal and state settlement negotiations currently in progress and expiring statutes in federal, foreign and state jurisdictions.
The Company classifies all income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2013 , there was an increase of $103 in income tax interest and penalties and in 2012 and 2011 , the Company recognized a release of $1,532 and $1,163 , respectively. At December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the Company has accrued $6,246 , $6,178 and $8,095 , respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties.


71

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

NOTE 15 – NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE  
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Basic
 
 
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding
100,897,512

 
101,714,901

 
103,471,323

Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

Less net income allocated to unvested restricted shares
(4,596
)
 
(5,114
)
 
(4,825
)
Net income allocated to common shares
$
747,965

 
$
625,920

 
$
437,035

Net income per common share
$
7.41

 
$
6.15

 
$
4.22

Diluted
 
 
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding
100,897,512

 
101,714,901

 
103,471,323

Stock options and other contingently issuable shares (a)
2,151,359

 
2,215,528

 
2,200,650

Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution
103,048,871

 
103,930,429

 
105,671,973

Net income
$
752,561

 
$
631,034

 
$
441,860

Less net income allocated to unvested restricted shares
assuming dilution
(4,509
)
 
(5,008
)
 
(4,756
)
Net income allocated to common shares assuming dilution
$
748,052

 
$
626,026

 
$
437,104

Net income per common share
$
7.26

 
$
6.02

 
$
4.14

(a)
Stock options and other contingently issuable shares excludes 842,354 , 1,047,734 and 101,260 shares at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect.
The Company has two classes of participating securities: common shares and restricted shares, representing 99% and 1% of outstanding shares, respectively. The restricted shares are shares of unvested restricted stock granted under the Company’s restricted stock award program. Unvested restricted shares granted prior to April 21, 2010 received non-forfeitable dividends. Accordingly, the shares are considered a participating security and the two-class method of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share is required. Effective April 21, 2010, the restricted stock award program was revised and dividends on performance-based restricted shares granted after this date are deferred and payment is contingent upon the awards vesting. Only the time-based restricted shares, which continue to receive non-forfeitable dividends, are considered a participating security. Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the two-class method in accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the ASC.
NOTE 16 – SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)  
 
2013
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 
Full Year
Net sales
$
2,167,168

 
$
2,713,889

 
$
2,847,417

 
$
2,457,058

 
$
10,185,532

Gross profit
962,851

 
1,233,579

 
1,295,958

 
1,124,178

 
4,616,566

Net income
116,185

 
257,287

 
262,966

 
116,123

 
752,561

Net income per common share - basic
1.13

 
2.51

 
2.61

 
1.16

 
7.41

Net income per common share - diluted
1.11

 
2.46

 
2.55

 
1.14

 
7.26

Net income in the fourth quarter was increased by inventory adjustments. Gross profit increased by $ 14,938 ($ .09 per share), primarily as a result of adjustments based on an annual physical inventory count performed during the fourth quarter, year-end inventory levels and related cost adjustments.
 
2012
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 
Full Year
Net sales
$
2,136,344

 
$
2,573,022

 
$
2,603,226

 
$
2,221,870

 
$
9,534,462

Gross profit
909,839

 
1,150,597

 
1,150,282

 
995,508

 
4,206,226

Net income
100,216

 
227,813

 
234,953

 
68,052

 
631,034

Net income per common share - basic
.97

 
2.23

 
2.29

 
.66

 
6.15

Net income per common share - diluted
.95

 
2.17

 
2.24

 
.65

 
6.02

Net income in the fourth quarter was decreased by $49,163 ( $.47 per share) due to the DOL Settlement (see Note 9 ) and increased by inventory adjustments and adjustments to compensation and benefit expenses. Gross profit increased by $28,724 ( $.17 per share), primarily as a result of adjustments of $29,488 based on an annual physical inventory count performed during the fourth quarter, year-end inventory levels and related cost adjustments. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $5,645 ( $.03 per share) related to compensation and benefit expense adjustments.

72  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 17 – OPERATING LEASES
The Company leases certain stores, warehouses, manufacturing facilities, office space and equipment. Renewal options are available on the majority of leases and, under certain conditions, options exist to purchase certain properties. Rental expense for operating leases, recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in accordance with the Leases Topic of the ASC was $327,592 , $310,109 and $292,516 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Certain store leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on sales in excess of specified minimums. Contingent rentals included in rent expense were $44,084 , $39,340 and $36,917 in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Rental income, as lessor, from real estate leasing activities and sublease rental income for all years presented was not significant. The following schedule summarizes the future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2013 :
2014
$
277,599

2015
242,261

2016
199,568

2017
152,446

2018
104,186

Later years
244,072

Total minimum lease payments
$
1,220,132

NOTE 18 – REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company reports its segment information in the same way that management internally organizes its business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC. The Company has determined that it has four reportable operating segments: Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (individually, a "Reportable Segment" and collectively, the “Reportable Segments”). Factors considered in determining the four Reportable Segments of the Company include the nature of business activities, the management structure directly accountable to the Company’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) for operating and administrative activities, availability of discrete financial information and information presented to the Board of Directors. The Company reports all other business activities and immaterial operating segments that are not reportable in the Administrative segment. See pages 6 through 15 of this report for more information about the Reportable Segments.
The Company’s CODM has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer because he has final authority over performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. Because of the diverse operations of the Company, the CODM regularly receives discrete financial information about each Reportable Segment as well as a significant amount of additional financial information about certain divisions, business units or subsidiaries of the Company. The CODM uses all such financial information for performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. The CODM evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to the Reportable Segments based on profit or loss before income taxes and cash generated from operations. The accounting
 
policies of the Reportable Segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of this report.
The Paint Stores Group consisted of 3,908 company-operated specialty paint stores in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Jamaica, Curacao and Aruba at December 31, 2013 . Each store in this segment is engaged in the related business activity of selling paint, coatings and related products to end-use customers. The Paint Stores Group markets and sells Sherwin-Williams ® branded architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related items. These products are produced by manufacturing facilities in the Consumer Group. In addition, each store sells selected purchased associated products. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the business of this segment. During 2013 , this segment opened or acquired 388 net new stores, consisting of 392 new stores opened or acquired ( 301 in the United States, 86 in Canada, 2 in Puerto Rico, 2 in Trinidad and 1 in Jamaica) and 4 stores closed in the United States. In 2012 and 2011 , this segment opened 70 and 60 net new stores, respectively. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of paint stores and their geographic location. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Paint Stores Group, supplemented with information by geographic region, product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Paint Stores Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Paint Stores Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.
The Consumer Group develops, manufactures and distributes a variety of paint, coatings and related products to third-party customers primarily in the United States and Canada and the Paint Stores Group. Approximately 64 percent of the total sales of the Consumer Group in 2013 were intersegment transfers of products primarily sold through the Paint Stores Group. Sales and marketing of certain controlled brand and private labeled products is performed by a direct sales staff. The products distributed through third-party customers are intended for resale to the ultimate end-user of the product. The Consumer Group had sales to certain customers that, individually, may be a significant portion of the sales of the segment. However, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the overall profitability of the segment. This segment incurred most of the Company’s capital expenditures related to ongoing environmental compliance measures. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Consumer Group, supplemented with information by product types and customer, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Consumer Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Consumer Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.


73

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

The Global Finishes Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of protective and marine products, automotive finishes and refinish products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America, Europe and Asia. This segment meets the demands of its customers for a consistent worldwide product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. This segment licenses certain technology and trade names worldwide. Sherwin-Williams ® and other controlled brand products are distributed through the Paint Stores Group and this segment’s 300 company-operated branches and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, jobbers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2013 , this segment opened 2 new branches ( 1 each in the United States and Canada) and closed 4 ( 2 each in the United States and Canada) for a net decrease of 2 branches. At December 31, 2013 , the Global Finishes Group consisted of operations in the United States, subsidiaries in 34 foreign countries and income from licensing agreements in 16 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Global Finishes Group reportable segment, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Global Finishes Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Global Finishes Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of branches and their geographic locations.
The Latin America Coatings Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America. This segment meets the demands of its customers for consistent regional product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. Sherwin-Williams ® and other controlled brand products are distributed through this segment’s 282 company-operated stores and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2013 , this segment opened 14 new stores ( 12 in South America and 2 in Mexico) and closed 8 ( 7 in South America and 1 in Mexico) for a net increase of 6 stores. At December 31, 2013 , the Latin America Coatings Group consisted of operations from subsidiaries in 9 foreign countries, 4 foreign joint ventures and income from licensing agreements in 7 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Latin America Coatings Group, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of stores and their geographic locations.
The Administrative segment includes the administrative expenses of the Company’s corporate headquarters site. Also included in the Administrative segment was interest expense, interest and investment income, certain expenses related to closed facilities and environmental-related matters, and other expenses which were not directly associated with the Reportable Segments. The Administrative segment did not include any significant foreign operations. Also included in the Administrative segment was a real estate management unit that is responsible for the ownership, management and leasing of non-retail properties held primarily for use by the Company, including the Company’s headquarters site, and disposal of idle facilities. Sales of this segment represented external leasing revenue of excess headquarters
 
space or leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary businesses. Gains and losses from the sale of property were not a significant operating factor in determining the performance of the Administrative segment.


74  

 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Net external sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $2,129,626 , $2,049,814 and $1,982,859 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries was $106,166 , $158,377 and $122,436 for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. The decrease in segment profit in 2013 was primarily due to Brazil tax assessments and unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Domestic operations accounted for the remaining net external sales and segment profits. Long-lived assets consisted of Property, plant and equipment, Goodwill, Intangible assets, Deferred pension assets and Other assets. The aggregate total of long-lived assets for the Company was $3,223,790 , $3,085,499 and, $2,967,660 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Long-lived assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries totaled $627,702 , $718,409 and $650,681 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Total Assets of the Company were $6,382,507 , $6,234,737 and $5,229,252 at December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. Total assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $1,625,422 , $1,598,996 and $1,443,034 , which represented 25.5 percent , 25.6 percent and 27.6 percent of the Company’s total assets at
 
December 31, 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively. No single geographic area outside the United States was significant relative to consolidated net sales or operating profits. Export sales and sales to any individual customer were each less than 10 percent of consolidated sales to unaffiliated customers during all years presented.
In the reportable segment financial information that follows, Segment profit was total net sales and intersegment transfers less operating costs and expenses. Identifiable assets were those directly identified with each reportable segment. The Administrative segment assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, deferred pension assets and headquarters property, plant and equipment. The margin for each reportable segment was based upon total net sales and intersegment transfers. Domestic intersegment transfers were accounted for at the approximate fully absorbed manufactured cost, based on normal capacity volumes, plus customary distribution costs. International intersegment transfers were accounted for at values comparable to normal unaffiliated customer sales.


75

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
 

(millions of dollars)
2013
 
Paint Stores
Group
 
Consumer
Group
 
Global
Finishes
Group
 
Latin America
Coatings
Group
 
Administrative
 
Consolidated
Totals
Net external sales
$
6,002

 
$
1,342

 
$
2,005

 
$
832

 
$
5

 
$
10,186

Intersegment transfers
 
 
2,409

 
9

 
39

 
(2,457
)
 
 
Total net sales and
intersegment transfers
$
6,002

 
$
3,751

 
$
2,014

 
$
871

 
$
(2,452
)
 
$
10,186

Segment profit
$
991

 
$
242

(1)  
$
170

 
$
39

 
 
 
$
1,442

Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(63
)
 
(63
)
Administrative expenses and other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(293
)
 
(293
)
Income before income taxes
$
991

 
$
242

 
$
170

 
$
39

 
$
(356
)
 
$
1,086

Reportable segment margins
16.5
%
 
6.5
%
 
8.4
%
 
4.5
%
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets
$
1,668

 
$
1,762

 
$
964

 
$
485

 
$
1,504

 
$
6,383

Capital expenditures
73

 
40

 
15

 
7

 
32

 
167

Depreciation
55

 
45

 
29

 
10

 
20

 
159

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012
 
Paint Stores
Group
 
Consumer
Group
 
Global Finishes
Group
 
Latin America
Coatings
Group
 
Administrative
 
Consolidated
Totals
Net external sales
$
5,410

 
$
1,322

 
$
1,961

 
$
836

 
$
5

 
$
9,534

Intersegment transfers
 
 
2,320

 
7

 
47

 
(2,374
)
 
 
Total net sales and
intersegment transfers
$
5,410

 
$
3,642

 
$
1,968

 
$
883

 
$
(2,369
)
 
$
9,534

Segment profit
$
862

 
$
217

(1)  
$
147

 
$
81

 
 
 
$
1,307

Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(43
)
 
(43
)
Administrative expenses and other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(357
)
(2)  
(357
)
Income before income taxes
$
862

 
$
217

 
$
147

 
$
81

 
$
(400
)
 
$
907

Reportable segment margins
15.9
%
 
6.0
%
 
7.5
%
 
9.2
%
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets
$
1,374

 
$
1,701

 
$
987

 
$
485

 
$
1,688

 
$
6,235

Capital expenditures
67

 
47

 
14

 
9

 
20

 
157

Depreciation
49

 
43

 
30

 
10

 
20

 
152

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011
 
Paint Stores
Group
 
Consumer
Group
 
Global Finishes
Group
 
Latin America
Coatings
Group
 
Administrative
 
Consolidated
Totals
Net external sales
$
4,780

 
$
1,274

 
$
1,878

 
$
828

 
$
6

 
$
8,766

Intersegment transfers
 
 
2,091

 
9

 
39

 
(2,139
)
 


Total net sales and
intersegment transfers
$
4,780

 
$
3,365

 
$
1,887

 
$
867

 
$
(2,133
)
 
$
8,766

Segment profit
$
646

 
$
174

(1)  
$
90

 
$
75

 

 
$
985

Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(42
)
 
(42
)
Administrative expenses and other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(201
)
 
(201
)
Income before income taxes
$
646

 
$
174

 
$
90

 
$
75

 
$
(243
)
 
$
742

Reportable segment margins
13.5
%
 
5.2
%
 
4.8
%
 
8.7
%
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets
$
1,309

 
$
1,682

 
$
939

 
$
469

 
$
830

 
$
5,229

Capital expenditures
50

 
35

 
14

 
14

 
41

 
154

Depreciation
48

 
43

 
31

 
11

 
18

 
151

(1)  
Segment profit included $30 , $27 and $24 of mark-up on intersegment transfers realized primarily as a result of external sales by the Paint Stores Group during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively.
(2)  
Includes $80 pre-tax charge related to DOL Settlement. See Note 9 .

76  


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Letter to Shareholders” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and the costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters and the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “plans to” and similar expressions.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from the Company’s historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include such things as: (a) general business conditions, strengths of retail and manufacturing economies and the growth in the coatings industry; (b) competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation and quality; (c) changes in raw material and energy supplies and pricing; (d) changes in the Company’s relationships with customers and suppliers; (e) the Company’s ability to attain cost savings from productivity initiatives; (f) the Company’s ability to successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into its existing operations, including the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico and the recent acquisitions of the Comex business in the United States and Canada, Geocel and Jiangsu Pulanna, as well as the performance of the businesses acquired; (g) legal, regulatory and other
 
matters that may affect the timing of our ability to complete the pending acquisition of the Comex business in Mexico; (h) risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s ownership of Life Shield Engineered Systems LLC; (i) changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, and changing government policies, laws and regulations; (j) risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s expansion into and its operations in Asia, Europe, Mexico, South America and other foreign markets, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest and other external economic and political factors; (k) the achievement of growth in foreign markets, such as Asia, Europe, Mexico and South America; (l) increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations including those affecting health, safety and the environment; (m) inherent uncertainties involved in assessing the Company’s potential liability for environmental-related activities; (n) other changes in governmental policies, laws and regulations, including changes in accounting policies and standards and taxation requirements (such as new tax laws and new or revised tax law interpretations); (o) the nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, and the effect of any legislation and administrative regulations relating thereto; and (p) unusual weather conditions.
Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



77


SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION









Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders
will be held in the Landmark
Conference Center, 927 Midland
Building, 101 W. Prospect Avenue,
Cleveland, Ohio on Wednesday,
April 16, 2014 at 9:00 A.M.,
local time.

Headquarters
101 W. Prospect Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075
(216) 566-2000
www.sherwin.com

Investor Relations
Robert J. Wells
Senior Vice President - Corporate
Communications and Public Affairs
The Sherwin-Williams Company
101 W. Prospect Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075
 
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio

Stock Trading
Sherwin-Williams Common Stock—
Symbol, SHW—is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange.

Dividend Reinvestment Program
A dividend reinvestment program is
available to shareholders of common
stock. For information, contact
Wells Fargo Shareowner Services.

Form 10-K
The Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, is
available without charge. To obtain
a copy, contact Investor Relations.
 
Transfer Agent & Registrar
Our transfer agent, Wells Fargo
Shareowner Services, maintains the
records for our registered shareholders
and can help with a wide variety of
shareholder related services, including
the direct deposit of dividends and
online access to your account. Contact:
Wells Fargo Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64856
St. Paul, MN 55164-0856
www.shareowneronline.com
1-800-468-9716 Toll-free
651-450-4064 outside the United States
651-450-4144 TDD

78  


SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION










COMMON STOCK TRADING STATISTICS
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
High
$
195.32

 
$
159.80

 
$
90.42

 
$
84.99

 
$
64.13

Low
153.94

 
90.21

 
69.47

 
57.86

 
42.19

Close December 31
183.50

 
153.82

 
89.27

 
83.75

 
61.65

Shareholders of record
7,555

 
7,954

 
8,360

 
8,706

 
9,151

Shares traded (thousands)
186,854

 
282,397

 
286,276

 
316,582

 
430,216

QUARTERLY STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
2013
 
2012
Quarter
 
High
 
Low
 
Dividend
 
Quarter
 
High
 
Low
 
Dividend
1st
 
$
172.41

 
$
153.94

 
$
.500

 
1st
 
$
110.79

 
$
90.21

 
$
.390

2nd
 
194.56

 
162.22

 
.500

 
2nd
 
133.97

 
107.29

 
.390

3rd
 
190.68

 
163.63

 
.500

 
3rd
 
150.80

 
122.79

 
.390

4th
 
195.32

 
170.63

 
.500

 
4th
 
159.80

 
138.36

 
.390



79


CORPORATE OFFICERS AND
OPERATING MANAGEMENT


Corporate Officers
 
Operating Management
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Christopher M. Connor, 57*
 
Joel Baxter, 53
 
Timothy A. Knight, 49*
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
President & General Manager
 
President

 
Global Supply Chain Division
 
Latin America Coatings Group
John G. Morikis, 50*
 
Consumer Group
 

President and Chief Operating Officer
 

 
Cheri M. Phyfer, 42

 
Paul R. Clifford, 50
 
President & General Manager
Sean P. Hennessy, 56*
 
President & General Manager
 
Diversified Brands Division
Senior Vice President - Finance and
 
Canada Division
 
Consumer Group
Chief Financial Officer
 
Paint Stores Group
 


 

 
Ronald B. Rossetto, 47
Thomas E. Hopkins, 56*
 
Robert J. Davisson, 53*
 
President & General Manager
Senior Vice President -
 
President
 
Protective & Marine Coatings Division
Human Resources
 
Paint Stores Group
 
Global Finishes Group

 

 

Catherine M. Kilbane, 50*
 
Timothy J. Drouilhet, 52
 
David B. Sewell, 45
Senior Vice President, General
 
President & General Manager
 
President & General Manager
Counsel and Secretary
 
Eastern Division
 
Product Finishes Division

 
Paint Stores Group
 
Global Finishes Group
Steven J. Oberfeld, 61*
 

 

Senior Vice President -
 
Monty J. Griffin, 53
 
Todd V. Wipf, 49
Corporate Planning and Development
 
President & General Manager
 
President & General Manager

 
South Western Division
 
Southeastern Division
Robert J. Wells, 56*
 
Paint Stores Group
 
Paint Stores Group
Senior Vice President - Corporate
 

 

Communications and Public Affairs
 
Thomas C. Hablitzel, 51
 


 
President & General Manager
 

Allen J. Mistysyn, 45*
 
Automotive Division
 

Vice President -
 
Global Finishes Group
 
 
Corporate Controller
 

 
 

 
George E. Heath, 48*
 
 
Jeffrey J. Miklich, 39
 
President
 
 
Vice President and Treasurer
 
Global Finishes Group
 
 

 
 
 
 
Jane M. Cronin, 46
 
Peter J. Ippolito, 49
 
 
Vice President - Corporate Audit
 
President & General Manager
 
 
and Loss Prevention
 
Mid Western Division
 
 

 
Paint Stores Group
 
 
Michael T. Cummins, 55
 
 
 
 
Vice President - Taxes and
 
 
 
 
Assistant Secretary
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Richard M. Weaver, 59
 
 
 
 
Vice President - Administration
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Executive Officer as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


80  


CORPORATE OFFICERS AND
OPERATING MANAGEMENT











EXHIBIT 21

The Sherwin-Williams Company
Subsidiaries

Domestic


Subsidiary
State of
 
Incorporation
 
 
Comex North America, Inc.
DE
Contract Transportation Systems Co.
DE
Omega Specialty Products & Services LLC
OH
Sherwin-Williams Realty Holdings, Inc.
IL
SWIMC, Inc.
DE
The Sherwin-Williams Acceptance Corporation
NV
        

Foreign


Subsidiary
Country of
 
Incorporation
 
 
Compania Sherwin-Williams, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
Geocel Limited
UK
Jiangsu Pulanna Coating Co., Ltd.
China
Oy Sherwin-Williams Finland Ab
Finland
Pinturas Condor S.A.
Ecuador
Pinturas Industriales S.A.
Uruguay
Productos Quimicos y Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
Przedsiêbiorstwo Altax Sp. z o.o
Poland
Quetzal Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
Mexico
Ronseal (Ireland) Limited
Ireland
Ronseal Limited
UK
Sherwin-Williams Argentina I.y C.S.A.
Argentina
Sherwin-Williams Aruba VBA
Aruba
Sherwin-Williams (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Australia
Sherwin-Williams Automotive Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
Mexico
Sherwin-Williams Balkan S.R.L.
Romania
Sherwin-Williams Bel
Belarus
Sherwin-Williams (Belize) Limited
Belize
Sherwin-Williams Benelux NV
Belgium
Sherwin-Williams Canada Inc.
Canada
Sherwin-Williams (Caribbean) N.V.
Curacao
Sherwin-Williams Cayman Islands Limited
Grand Cayman





Sherwin-Williams Chile S.A.
Chile
Sherwin-Williams Coatings S.a r.l.
Luxembourg
Sherwin Williams Colombia S.A.S.
Colombia
Sherwin-Williams Czech Republic spol. s r.o
Czech Republic
Sherwin-Williams Denmark A/S
Denmark
Sherwin-Williams Deutschland GmbH
Germany
Sherwin-Williams do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda.
Brazil
Sherwin-Williams France Finishes SAS
France
Sherwin-Williams HK Limited
Hong Kong
Sherwin-Williams (Ireland) Limited
Ireland
Sherwin-Williams Italy S.r.l.
Italy
Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg Investment Management Company S.a r.l.
Luxembourg
Sherwin-Williams (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Malaysia
Sherwin-Williams Norway AS
Norway
Sherwin-Williams Paints Limited Liability Company
Russia
Sherwin-Williams Peru S.R.L.
Peru
Sherwin-Williams Pinturas de Venezuela S.A.
Venezuela
Sherwin-Williams Poland Sp. z o.o
Poland
Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings
UK
Sherwin-Williams (S) Pte. Ltd.
Singapore
Sherwin-Williams Services (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Malaysia
Sherwin-Williams (Shanghai) Limited
China
Sherwin-Williams Spain Coatings S.L.
Spain
Sherwin-Williams Sweden AB
Sweden
Sherwin-Williams (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Thailand
Sherwin-Williams UK Automotive Limited
UK
Sherwin-Williams Uruguay S.A.
Uruguay
Sherwin-Williams (Vietnam) Limited
Vietnam
Sherwin-Williams VI, LLC
Sherwin-Williams VI, LLC
Sherwin-Williams (West Indies) Limited
Jamaica
SWIPCO - Sherwin Williams do Brasil Propriedade
                   Intelectual Ltda.    
Brazil
The Sherwin-Williams Company Resources Limited
Jamaica
TOB Becker Acroma Ukraine
Ukraine
UAB Sherwin-Williams Lietuva
Lithuania
ZAO Sherwin-Williams
Russia
Zhao Qing Sherwin Williams Coatings Co., Ltd.
China
            






EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Sherwin-Williams Company of our reports dated February 27, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Sherwin-Williams Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Sherwin-Williams Company, included in the 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company.
 
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of The Sherwin-Williams Company listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of The Sherwin-Williams Company management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the date is February 27, 2014 , the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated February 27, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Sherwin-Williams Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Sherwin-Williams Company, incorporated by reference herein, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of The Sherwin-Williams Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Sherwin-Williams Company:

Registration Number
Description
333-166365
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of April 21, 2010) Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-152443
The Sherwin-Williams Company Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-133419
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan and The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-129582
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Savings and Pension Equalization Plan, The Sherwin-Williams 2005 Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan and The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Director Deferred Fee Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-105211
The Sherwin-Williams Company Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-101229
The Sherwin-Williams Company 2003 Stock Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement
333-66295
The Sherwin-Williams Company Deferred Compensation Savings Plan, The Sherwin-Williams Company Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan and The Sherwin-Williams Company Director Deferred Fee Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement


Cleveland, Ohio
February 27, 2014






EXHIBIT 24(a)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors and/or officers of The Sherwin-Williams Company, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Christopher M. Connor, Sean P. Hennessy and Catherine M. Kilbane, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, as the true and lawful attorney-in-fact or attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned to execute and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, with any and all amendments, supplements and exhibits thereto, and any and all other documents in connection therewith, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things necessary, appropriate or desirable to be done in the premises, or in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, as fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and approving all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them and any substitute therefor may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.
Executed as of this 19 th day of February, 2014.
Signature
 
 
 
Title
  /s/ Christopher M. Connor
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Christopher M. Connor
 
 
 
  /s/ Sean P. Hennessy
 
 
 
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Sean P. Hennessy
 
 
 
  /s/ Allen J. Mistysyn 
 
 
 
Vice President - Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Allen J. Mistysyn
 
 
 
  /s/ Arthur F. Anton
 
 
 
Director
Arthur F. Anton
 
 
 
  /s/ David F. Hodnik
 
 
 
Director
David F. Hodnik
 
 
 
  /s/ Thomas G. Kadien
 
 
 
Director
Thomas G. Kadien
 
 
 
  /s/ Richard J. Kramer
 
 
 
Director
Richard J. Kramer
 
 
 
  /s/ Susan J. Kropf
 
 
 
Director
Susan J. Kropf
 
 
 
  /s/ Richard K. Smucker
 
 
 
Director
Richard K. Smucker
 
 
 
  /s/ John M. Stropki
 
 
 
Director
John M. Stropki
 
 
 






EXHIBIT 24(b)


CERTIFICATE


I, the undersigned, Secretary of The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”), hereby certify that attached hereto is a true and complete copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, duly adopted at a meeting held on February 19, 2014, and that such resolution is in full force and effect and has not been amended, modified, revoked or rescinded as of the date hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 19th day of February, 2014.


/s/ Catherine M. Kilbane                 
Catherine M. Kilbane
Secretary









RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company are each hereby authorized to execute and deliver a power of attorney appointing Christopher M. Connor, Sean P. Hennessy and Catherine M. Kilbane or any of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to act as attorneys-in-fact for the Company and for such officers for the purpose of executing and filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any national securities exchange, on behalf of the Company, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and any and all amendments, exhibits and other documents in connection therewith, and to take other action deemed necessary and appropriate to effect the filing of such Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all such amendments, exhibits and other documents in connection therewith.








EXHIBIT 31(a)

CERTIFICATION
I, Christopher M. Connor, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Sherwin-Williams Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date:
February 27, 2014
 
 
/s/ Christopher M. Connor   
 
 
 
 
Christopher M. Connor
Chairman and Chief
    Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 31(b)

CERTIFICATION
I, Sean P. Hennessy, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Sherwin-Williams Company;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date:
February 27, 2014
 
 
/s/ Sean P. Hennessy
 
 
 
 
Sean P. Hennessy
Senior Vice President – Finance and
    Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT 32(a)

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher M. Connor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
Dated:
February 27, 2014
 
 
/s/ Christopher M. Connor   
 
 
 
 
Christopher M. Connor
Chairman and Chief
    Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Sherwin-Williams Company and will be retained by The Sherwin-Williams Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




EXHIBIT 32(b)

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. Hennessy, Senior Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
Dated:
February 27, 2014
 
 
/s/ Sean P. Hennessy
 
 
 
 
Sean P. Hennessy
Senior Vice President – Finance and
    Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Sherwin-Williams Company and will be retained by The Sherwin-Williams Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.