UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
þ      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015
OR
¨      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Commission File Number 1-6544
________________
Sysco Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
1390 Enclave Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
74-1648137
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
77077-2099
(Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(281) 584-1390
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each Class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
 
 
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ☑    No ☐
 
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ☐    No ☑
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☑    No ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 
Yes ☑   No ☐
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer  ☑
Accelerated Filer  ☐
Non-accelerated Filer   ☐    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company   ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ☐     No ☑

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by stockholders who were not affiliates (as defined by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission) of the registrant was approximately $23,927,875,000  as of December 27, 2014 (based on the closing sales price on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on December 26, 2014, as reported by The Wall Street Journal (Southwest Edition)).  As of August 13, 2015 , the registrant had issued and outstanding an aggregate of 594,917,977 shares of its common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the company’s 2015 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference into Part III.





TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
Page No.
 
PART I
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




PART I
Item 1.  Business
 
Unless this Form 10-K indicates otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Sysco,” or “the company” as used in this Form 10-K refer to Sysco Corporation together with its consolidated subsidiaries and divisions. 
 
Overview
 
Sysco Corporation, acting through its subsidiaries and divisions, is the largest North American distributor of food and related products primarily to the foodservice or food-away-from-home industry.  We provide products and related services to approximately 425,000 customers, including restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments and other foodservice customers.
 
Founded in 1969, Sysco commenced operations as a public company in March 1970 when the stockholders of nine companies exchanged their stock for Sysco common stock.  Since our formation, we have grown from $115.0 million to $48.7 billion in annual sales, both through internal expansion of existing operations and through acquisitions.
 
Sysco’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to June 30 th .  This resulted in a 52-week year ending June 27, 2015 for fiscal 2015 , June 28, 2014 for fiscal 2014 and June 29, 2013 for fiscal 2013 . We will have a 53-week year ending July 2, 2016 for fiscal 2016.
 
Sysco Corporation is organized under the laws of Delaware.  The address and telephone number of our executive offices are 1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston, Texas 77077-2099, (281) 584-1390.  This annual report on Form 10-K, as well as all other reports filed or furnished by Sysco pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available free of charge on Sysco’s website at www.sysco.com as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Operating Segments
 
Sysco provides food and related products to the foodservice or food-away-from-home industry.  Under the accounting provisions related to disclosures about segments of an enterprise, we have aggregated our operating companies into a number of segments, of which only Broadline and SYGMA are reportable segments as defined by accounting standards.  Broadline operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to their customers.  SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to chain restaurant customer locations.  Our other segments include our specialty produce companies, custom-cut meat companies, lodging industry products companies, a company that distributes specialty imported products, a company that distributes to international customers and the company’s Sysco Ventures platform, a suite of technology solutions that help support the business needs of Sysco’s customers.  Specialty produce companies distribute fresh produce and, on a limited basis, other foodservice products.  Our specialty meat companies distribute custom-cut fresh steaks, other meat, seafood and poultry. Our lodging industry products companies distribute personal care guest amenities, equipment, housekeeping supplies, room accessories and textiles to the lodging industry.  Selected financial data for each of our reportable segments, as well as financial information concerning geographic areas, can be found in Note 21, “Business Segment Information,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
Customers and Products
 
Sysco’s customers in the foodservice industry include restaurants, hospitals and nursing homes, schools and colleges, hotels and motels, industrial caterers and other similar venues where foodservice products are served.  Services to our customers are supported by similar physical facilities, vehicles, material handling equipment and techniques, and administrative and operating staffs.
 
The products we distribute include:
a full line of frozen foods, such as meats, seafood, fully prepared entrees, fruits, vegetables and desserts;
a full line of canned and dry foods;
fresh meats and seafood;
dairy products;
beverage products;
imported specialties; and
fresh produce.
 

1



We also supply a wide variety of non-food items, including:
paper products such as disposable napkins, plates and cups;
tableware such as china and silverware;
cookware such as pots, pans and utensils;
restaurant and kitchen equipment and supplies; and
cleaning supplies.
 
A comparison of the sales mix in the principal product categories during the last three years is presented below:
Principal product categories
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Fresh and frozen meats
 
21
%
 
19
%
 
19
%
Canned and dry products
 
16

 
18

 
19

Frozen fruits, vegetables, bakery and other
 
13

 
13

 
14

Dairy products
 
11

 
11

 
10

Poultry
 
11

 
10

 
10

Fresh produce
 
8

 
8

 
8

Paper and disposables
 
7

 
7

 
8

Seafood
 
5

 
5

 
5

Beverage products
 
4

 
4

 
4

Janitorial products
 
2

 
2

 
2

Equipment and smallwares
 
1

 
2

 
1

Medical supplies (1)
 
1

 
1

 

Totals
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
(1) Sales are less than 1% of total for years shown with a “-"
 
Our distribution centers, which we refer to as operating companies, distribute nationally-branded merchandise, as well as products packaged under our private brands.  Products packaged under our private brands have been manufactured for Sysco according to specifications that have been developed by our quality assurance team.  In addition, our quality assurance team certifies the manufacturing and processing plants where these products are packaged, enforces our quality control standards and identifies supply sources that satisfy our requirements.
 
We believe that prompt and accurate delivery of orders, competitive pricing, close contact with customers and the ability to provide a full array of products and services to assist customers in their foodservice operations are of primary importance in the marketing and distribution of foodservice products to our customers.  Our operating companies offer daily delivery to certain customer locations and have the capability of delivering special orders on short notice.  Through our approximately 12,800 sales and marketing representatives and support staff of Sysco and our operating companies, we stay informed of the needs of our customers and acquaint them with new products and services.  Our operating companies also provide ancillary services relating to foodservice distribution, such as providing customers with product usage reports and other data, menu-planning advice, food safety training and assistance in inventory control, as well as access to various third party services designed to add value to our customers’ businesses.
 
No single customer accounted for 10% or more of Sysco’s total sales for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015 .
 

2



We estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: 
 
Type of Customer
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Restaurants
64
%
 
62
%
 
61
%
Healthcare
9

 
9

 
10

Education, government
8

 
9

 
8

Travel, leisure, retail
8

 
8

 
8

Other (1)
11

 
12

 
13

Totals
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
(1) Other includes cafeterias that are not stand alone restaurants, bakeries, caterers, churches, civic and fraternal organizations, vending distributors, other distributors and international exports.  None of these types of customers, as a group, exceeded 5% of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented.
 
Sources of Supply
 
We purchase from thousands of suppliers, both domestic and international, none of which individually accounts for more than 10% of our purchases.  These suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise, as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers.  Purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies.
 
We administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop, obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products.  The program covers the purchasing and marketing of Sysco Brand merchandise, as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers, encompassing substantially all product lines.  Sysco’s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers, although Sysco Brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs.  We also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels, which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies, while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers.  This includes the construction and operation of regional distribution centers (RDCs), which aggregate inventory demand to optimize the supply chain activities for certain products for all Sysco broadline operating companies in the region.  Currently, we have two RDCs in operation, one in Virginia and one in Florida.
 
Working Capital Practices
 
Our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations, commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings.  See the discussion in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 regarding our liquidity, financial position and sources and uses of funds.
 
Credit terms we extend to our customers can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer’s credit worthiness.  We monitor each customer’s account and will suspend shipments if necessary.
 
A majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed.  We generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand.  The level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life, supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand.  We also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities.
 
We take advantage of suppliers’ cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 30 days or more.
 
Corporate Headquarters and Shared Services Center
 
Our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees, suppliers and customers.  Members of these groups possess experience and expertise in, among other areas, customer and vendor contract administration, vendor payments, procurement and maintenance support, invoicing, cash application, accounting and finance, treasury, credit services, legal, cash management, information technology, employee benefits, engineering, real estate and construction, risk management and insurance, sales and marketing, payroll, human resources, training and development, strategy, and tax compliance services, including sales and use tax administration.  The corporate office also makes available warehousing and distribution services, which provide assistance in operational best practices including space utilization, energy conservation, fleet management and work flow.

3



 
Capital Improvements
 
To maximize productivity and customer service, we continue to modernize, expand and construct new distribution facilities.  During fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , approximately $542.8 million , $523.2 million and $511.9 million , respectively, were invested in delivery fleet, facilities, technology and other capital asset enhancements.  From time to time, we dispose of assets in the normal course of business; we consider proceeds from these asset sales to be an offset to capital expenditures.  During fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sales of assets, were $518.4 million , $497.4 million and $496.3 million , respectively.  We estimate our capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sales of assets, in fiscal 2016 should be in the range of $550 million to $600 million .  During the three years ended June 27, 2015 , capital expenditures were financed primarily by internally generated funds, our commercial paper program and bank and other borrowings.  We expect to finance our fiscal 2016 capital expenditures from the same sources.
 
Employees
 
As of June 27, 2015 , we had approximately 51,700 employees, approximately 18% of whom were represented by unions, primarily the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.  Contract negotiations are handled by each individual operating company.  Approximately 37% of our union employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements that have expired or will expire during fiscal 2016 and are subject to renegotiation.  Since June 27, 2015 , there have been no contract renegotiations.  We consider our labor relations to be satisfactory.
 
Competition
 
Industry sources estimate that there are more than 16,500 companies engaged in the distribution of food and non-food products to the foodservice industry in the U.S.  Our customers may also choose to purchase products directly from wholesale or retail outlets, including club, cash and carry and grocery stores, or negotiate prices directly with our suppliers.  Online retailers and e-commerce companies are also participants in the foodservice industry.  While we compete primarily with local and regional distributors, some organizations compete with us on a multi-region basis.  In addition, these local, regional and multi-regional distributors can create purchasing cooperatives and marketing groups to enhance their competitive abilities by expanding their product mix, improving purchasing power and extending their geographic capabilities.  We believe that the principal competitive factors in the foodservice industry are effective customer contacts, the ability to deliver a wide range of quality products and related services on a timely and dependable basis and competitive prices.  Our customers are accustomed to purchasing from multiple suppliers and channels concurrently.  Product needs, service requirements and price are just a few of the factors they evaluate when deciding where to purchase.  Customers can choose from many broadline foodservice distributors, specialty distributors that focus on specific categories such as produce, meat or seafood, other wholesale channels, club stores, cash and carry stores, grocery stores and numerous online retailers.  Since switching costs are very low, customers can make supplier and channel changes very quickly.  There are few barriers to market entry.  Existing foodservice competitors can extend their shipping distances and add truck routes and warehouses relatively quickly to serve new markets or customers.
 
We consider our primary market to be the foodservice market in the U.S. and Canada and estimate that we serve about 17.7% of this approximately $264 billion annual market based on a measurement as of the end of calendar 2014 .  We believe, based upon industry trade data, that our sales to the U.S. and Canada food-away-from-home industry were the highest of any foodservice distributor during fiscal 2015 .  While adequate industry statistics are not available, we believe that, in most instances, our local operations are among the leading distributors of food and related non-food products to foodservice customers in their respective trading areas.  We believe our competitive advantages include our more than 7,300 marketing associates, our diversified product base, which includes a differentiated group of high quality Sysco brand products, the diversity in the types of customers we serve, our economies of scale and our multi-region portfolio in the U.S. and Canada, which mitigates some of the impact of regional economic declines that may occur over time.  We believe our liquidity and access to capital provides us the ability to continuously invest in business improvements.  We are one of the few distributors in the food-away-from-home industry in the U.S. with publicly traded equity.  While our public company status provides us with some advantages over many of our competitors, including access to capital, we believe it also provides us with some disadvantages that most of them do not have in terms of additional costs related to complying with regulatory requirements.
 
Government Regulation
 
Our company is required to comply, and it is our policy to comply, with all applicable laws in the numerous countries throughout the world in which we do business. In many jurisdictions, compliance with competition laws is of special importance to us, and our operations may come under special scrutiny by competition law authorities due to our competitive position in those jurisdictions.  In general, competition laws are designed to protect businesses and consumers from anti-competitive behavior.


4



In the U.S., as a marketer and distributor of food products, we are subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The FDA regulates food safety through various statutory and regulatory mandates, including manufacturing and holding requirements for foods through good manufacturing practice regulations, hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) requirements for certain foods, and the food and color additive approval process.  The agency also specifies the standards of identity for certain foods, prescribes the format and content of information required to appear on food product labels, regulates food contact packaging and materials, and maintains a Reportable Food Registry for the industry to report when there is a reasonable probability that an article of food will cause serious adverse health consequences.  For certain product lines, we are also subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, the Packers and Stockyard Act and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to interpret and implement these statutory provisions.  The USDA imposes standards for product safety, quality and sanitation through the federal meat and poultry inspection program.  The USDA reviews and approves the labeling of these products and also establishes standards for the grading and commercial acceptance of produce shipments from our suppliers.  We are also subject to the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, which imposes certain registration and record keeping requirements on facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold food for human or animal consumption.  
 
We and our products are also subject to state and local regulation through such measures as the licensing of our facilities; enforcement by state and local health agencies of state and local standards for our products; and regulation of our trade practices in connection with the sale of our products.  Our facilities are subject to regulations issued pursuant to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act by the U.S. Department of Labor.  These regulations require us to comply with certain manufacturing, health and safety standards to protect our employees from accidents and to establish hazard communication programs to transmit information on the hazards of certain chemicals present in products we distribute.
 
We are also subject to regulation by numerous federal, state and local regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Labor, which sets employment practice standards for workers, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, which regulates transportation of perishable and hazardous materials and waste, and similar state, provincial and local agencies.  In addition, we are also subject to the U.S. False Claims Act, and similar state statutes, which prohibit the submission of claims for payment to the government that are false and the knowing retention of overpayments. 
 
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits bribery of public officials to obtain or retain business in foreign jurisdictions.  The FCPA also requires us to keep accurate books and records and to maintain internal accounting controls to detect and prevent bribery and to ensure that transactions are properly authorized.  We have implemented and continue to develop a robust anti-corruption compliance program applicable to our global operations to detect and prevent bribery and to comply with these and other anti-corruption laws in countries where we operate.
 
Outside the U.S., our business is subject to numerous similar statutes and regulations, as well as other legal and regulatory requirements.
 
All of our company's facilities and other operations in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world are subject to various environmental protection statutes and regulations, including those relating to the use of water resources and the discharge of wastewater.  Further, most of our distribution facilities have ammonia-based refrigeration systems and tanks for the storage of diesel fuel and other petroleum products which are subject to laws regulating such systems and storage tanks.  Our policy is to comply with all such legal requirements.  We are subject to other federal, state, provincial and local provisions relating to the protection of the environment or the discharge of materials; however, these provisions do not materially impact the use or operation of our facilities. 
 
General
 
We have numerous trademarks that are of significant importance, including the SYSCO ® trademark and our privately-branded product trademarks that include the SYSCO ® trademark.  These trademarks and the private brands on which they are used are widely recognized within the foodservice industry.  Approximately half of our privately-branded sales are from products labeled with our SYSCO ® trademark without any other trademark.  We believe the loss of the SYSCO ® trademark would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.  Our U.S. trademarks are effective for a ten-year period and the company generally renews its trademarks before their expiration dates unless a particular trademark is no longer in use.  The company does not have any material patents or licenses.
 
We are not engaged in material research and development activities relating to the development of new products or the improvement of existing products.

5



 
Our sales do not generally fluctuate significantly on a seasonal basis; therefore, the business of the company is not deemed to be seasonal.

As of June 27, 2015 , we operated 197 distribution facilities throughout the U.S., Bahamas, Canada, and Ireland. We have interests in joint venture operations in Costa Rica and Mexico.
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
The following discussion of “risk factors” identifies the most significant factors that may adversely affect our business, operations, financial position or future financial performance.  This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this report.  The following discussion of risks is not all inclusive, but is designed to highlight what we believe are the most significant factors to consider when evaluating our business.  These factors could cause our future results to differ from our expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements identified within "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and from historical trends.
 
Industry and General Economic Risks
 
Periods of significant or prolonged inflation or deflation affect our product costs and may negatively impact our profitability .  
 
Volatile food costs have a direct impact on our industry.  Periods of product cost inflation may have a negative impact on our profit margins and earnings to the extent that we are unable to pass on all or a portion of such product cost increases to our customers, which may have a negative impact on our business and our profitability.  In addition, periods of rapidly increasing inflation may negatively impact our business due to the timing needed to pass on such increases, the impact of such inflation on discretionary spending by consumers and our limited ability to increase prices in the current, highly competitive environment.  Conversely, our business may be adversely impacted by periods of product cost deflation, because we make a significant portion of our sales at prices that are based on the cost of products we sell plus a percentage margin.  As a result, our profit levels may be negatively impacted during periods of product cost deflation, even though our gross profit percentage may remain relatively constant.
 
Unfavorable macroeconomic conditions in the U.S., as well as unfavorable conditions in particular local markets, may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition

     The foodservice distribution industry, which is characterized by relatively low profit margins with limited demand growth expected in the near-term, is especially susceptible to negative trends and economic uncertainty.  The U.S. has experienced an uneven economic environment over the past several years.  In addition, our results of operations are substantially affected by local operating and economic conditions, which can vary substantially by market.  Economic conditions can affect us in the following ways:
Unfavorable conditions can depress sales and/or gross margins in a given market.
Food cost and fuel cost inflation experienced by the consumer can lead to reductions in the frequency of dining out and the amount spent by consumers for food-away-from-home purchases, which could negatively impact our business by reducing demand for our products. 
Heightened uncertainty in the financial markets negatively affects consumer confidence and discretionary spending, which can cause disruptions with our customers and suppliers.
Liquidity issues and the inability of our customers, vendors and suppliers to consistently access credit markets to obtain cash to support operations can cause temporary interruptions in our ability to conduct day-to-day transactions involving the payment to or collection of funds from our customers, vendors and suppliers.
 
The uncertainty in the economic environment has adversely affected the rate of improvement in both business and consumer confidence and spending, and uncertainty about the long-term investment environment could further depress capital investment and economic activity.    
 
Competition in our industry may adversely impact our margins and our ability to retain customers, and makes it difficult for us to maintain our market share, growth rate and profitability .    
 
The foodservice distribution industry is fragmented and highly competitive, with local, regional, multi-regional distributors and specialty competitors.  Furthermore, barriers to entry by new competitors, or geographic or product line expansion

6



by existing competitors, are low.  Additionally, increased competition from non-traditional sources (such as club stores and commercial wholesale outlets with lower cost structures), and group purchasing organizations have served to further increase pressure on the industry’s profit margins, and continued margin pressure within the industry may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and profitability.  Finally, demand for food-away-from-home products is volatile and price sensitive, imposing limits on our customers’ ability to absorb cost increases.  New and increasing competitive sources may result in increased focus on pricing and on limiting price increases, or may require increased discounting.  Such competition or other industry pressures may result in margin erosion and/or make it difficult for us to attract and retain customers.
 
If we are unable to effectively differentiate ourselves from our competitors, our market share, sales and profitability, through increased expenditures or decreased prices, could be adversely impacted.
 
We may not be able to fully compensate for increases in fuel costs, and forward purchase commitments intended to contain fuel costs could result in above market fuel costs .  
 
Volatile fuel prices have a direct impact on our industry.  We require significant quantities of fuel for our delivery vehicles and are exposed to the risk associated with fluctuations in the market price for fuel.  The price and supply of fuel can fluctuate significantly based on international, political and economic circumstances, as well as other factors outside our control, such as actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other oil and gas producers, regional production patterns, weather conditions and environmental concerns.  The cost of fuel affects the price paid by us for products, as well as the costs we incur to deliver products to our customers.  Although we have been able to pass along a portion of increased fuel costs to our customers in the past, there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so in the future.  If fuel costs increase in the future, we may experience difficulties in passing all or a portion of these costs along to our customers, which may have a negative impact on our business and our profitability.  We routinely enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements at prices equal to the then-current forward price for diesel.  If fuel prices decrease significantly, these forward purchases will result in our paying higher than market costs for a portion of our diesel fuel. 
 
Business and Operational Risks
 
Conditions beyond our control can interrupt our supplies and increase our product costs .    
 
We obtain substantially all of our foodservice and related products from third-party suppliers. Although our purchasing volume can provide benefits when dealing with suppliers, suppliers may not provide the foodservice products and supplies needed by us in the quantities and at the prices requested. We are also subject to delays caused by interruptions in production and increases in product costs based on conditions outside of our control. These conditions include work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees of suppliers, short-term weather conditions or more prolonged climate change, crop and other agricultural conditions, water shortages, animal disease outbreaks, transportation interruptions, unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs, product recalls, competitive demands and natural disasters or other catastrophic events (including, but not limited to food-borne illnesses). Further, increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also impair production capabilities, disrupt our supply chain or impact demand for our products. Input costs could increase at any point in time for a large portion of the products that we sell for a prolonged period. Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of foodservice and related products as a result of any of the foregoing factors or otherwise could mean that we could not fulfill our obligations to customers, and customers may turn to other distributors.
 
Adverse publicity about us or lack of confidence in our products could negatively impact our reputation and reduce earnings .  
 
Maintaining a good reputation and public confidence in the safety of the products we distribute is critical to our business.  The Sysco brand name, trademarks and logos and our reputation are powerful sales and marketing tools, and we devote significant resources to promoting and protecting them.  Anything that damages our reputation or public confidence in our products, whether or not justified, including adverse publicity about the quality, safety, sustainability or integrity of our products or relating to activities by our operations, employees, suppliers or agents could tarnish our reputation and diminish the value of our brand, which could adversely affect our revenues and profits.
 
Reports, whether true or not, of food-borne illnesses (such as e-coli, avian flu, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, hepatitis A, trichinosis, salmonella, listeria or swine flu) and injuries caused by food tampering could also severely injure our reputation or negatively impact public confidence in our products.  If patrons of our restaurant customers become ill from food-borne illnesses, our customers could be forced to temporarily close restaurant locations and our sales and profitability would be correspondingly decreased.  In addition, instances of food-borne illnesses or food tampering or other health concerns (even those unrelated to the use of Sysco products) or public concern regarding the safety of our products, can result in negative publicity about the food service distribution industry and cause our sales and profitability to decrease dramatically.

7



 
Damage to our reputation and loss of brand equity could reduce demand for our products and services.  This reduction in demand, together with the dedication of time and expense necessary to defend our reputation, would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation and restore the value of our brand.  Our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if our public image or reputation were to be tarnished by negative publicity including dissemination via print, broadcast or social media, or other forms of Internet-based communications.  Adverse publicity about regulatory or legal action against us could damage our reputation and image, undermine our customers’ confidence and reduce short-term or long-term demand for our products and services, even if the regulatory or legal action is unfounded or not material to our operations.  Any of these events could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Unfavorable changes to the mix of locally-managed customers versus corporate-managed customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Gross margin from our corporate-managed customers is generally lower than that of our locally-managed customers because we typically sell higher volumes of products to these customers and provide a relatively lower level of value-added services than we do to locally-managed customers.  If sales to our locally-managed customers do not grow at the same or a greater rate as sales to our corporate-managed customers, our operating margins may decline.
 
Moreover, if sales to our corporate-managed customers increase at a faster pace of growth than sales to our locally-managed customers, we will become more dependent on corporate-managed customers as they begin to represent a greater proportion of our total sales.  Additionally, the loss of sales to the larger of these corporate-managed customers could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.  Additionally, as a result of our greater dependence on these customers, we could be pressured by them to lower our prices and/or offer expanded or additional services at the same prices.  In that event, we would need to achieve additional cost savings to offset these price reductions and/or cost increases or our gross margins and profitability could be materially adversely affected.  We may be unable to change our cost structure and pricing practices rapidly enough to successfully compete in such an environment.

We may not realize anticipated benefits from our operating cost reduction efforts .

We have implemented, and expect to implement in the future, cost reduction initiatives that we believe are necessary to position our business for future success and growth. Our future success and earnings growth will be significantly impacted by our ability to achieve a lower cost structure and operate efficiently in the highly competitive food and beverage industry, particularly in an environment of increased competitive activity and low growth rates. A variety of factors could cause us not to realize some of the expected cost savings, including, among other things, delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost savings initiatives, lack of sustainability in cost savings over time and unexpected costs associated with operating our business. If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from our cost cutting efforts, we could become cost disadvantaged in the marketplace, and our competitiveness and our profitability could decrease. Furthermore, even if we realize the anticipated benefits of our cost reduction efforts, we may experience an adverse effect on our employees, customers and suppliers, which could negatively affect our sales and profits.
 
Expanding into international markets and complementary lines of business presents unique challenges, and our expansion efforts with respect to international operations and complementary lines of business may not be successful .  
 
In addition to our domestic activities, an element of our strategy includes the possibility of further expansion of operations into international markets and the establishment of international procurement organizations.  Our ability to successfully operate in international markets may be adversely affected by local laws and customs, legal and regulatory constraints, including compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, political and economic conditions and currency regulations of the countries or regions in which we currently operate or intend to operate in the future.  Risks inherent in our existing and future international operations also include, among others, the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, difficulties in identifying and gaining access to local suppliers, suffering possible adverse tax consequences, maintaining product quality and greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights.  Additionally, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations thereof may have an adverse effect on our future costs or on future sales and cash flows from our international operations.
 
Another element of our strategy includes the possibility of expansion into businesses that are closely related or complementary to, but not currently part of, our core foodservice distribution business.  Our ability to successfully operate in these complementary business markets may be adversely affected by legal and regulatory constraints, including compliance with regulatory programs to which we become subject.  Risks inherent in branching out into such complementary markets also include

8



the costs and difficulties of managing operations outside of our core business, which may require additional skills and competencies, as well as difficulties in identifying and gaining access to suppliers or customers in new markets.

Product liability claims could materially impact our business .
 
We, like any other seller of food, face the risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of products sold by Sysco causes injury or illness.  We cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters.  Further, even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.  With respect to product liability claims, we believe we have sufficient primary or excess umbrella liability insurance.  However, this insurance may not continue to be available at a reasonable cost or, if available, may not be adequate to cover all of our liabilities.  We generally seek contractual indemnification and insurance coverage from parties supplying our products, but this indemnification or insurance coverage is limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party and the insured limits of any insurance provided by suppliers.  If Sysco does not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification available, product liability relating to defective products could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to comply with requirements imposed by applicable law or other governmental regulations, we could become subject to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations that could significantly and adversely affect our business .

We are subject to governmental regulation at the federal, state, international, national, provincial and local levels in many areas of our business, such as food safety and sanitation, minimum wage, overtime, wage payment, wage and hour and employment discrimination, immigration, human health and safety, and due to the services we provide in connection with governmentally funded entitlement programs. From time to time, both federal and state governmental agencies have conducted audits of our billing practices as part of investigations of providers of services under governmental contracts, or otherwise. We also receive requests for information from governmental agencies in connection with these audits. While we attempt to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot represent that we are in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations or interpretations of these laws and regulations at all times or that we will be able to comply with any future laws, regulations or interpretations of these laws and regulations.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations or encounter disagreements with respect to our contracts subject to governmental regulations, including those referred to above, we may be subject to investigations, criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, prohibitions on exporting, seizures or debarments from contracting with the government. The cost of compliance or the consequences of non-compliance, including debarments, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, governmental units may make changes in the regulatory frameworks within which we operate that may require us to incur substantial increases in costs in order to comply with such laws and regulations.

We must finance and integrate acquired businesses effectively .
 
Historically, a portion of our growth has come through acquisitions.  If we are unable to integrate acquired businesses successfully or realize anticipated economic, operational and other benefits and synergies in a timely manner, our earnings per share may be materially adversely affected.  Integration of an acquired business may be more difficult when we acquire a business in a market in which we have limited expertise, or with a culture different from Sysco’s.  A significant expansion of our business and operations, in terms of geography or magnitude, could strain our administrative and operational resources.  Significant acquisitions may also require the issuance of material additional amounts of debt or equity, which could materially alter our debt-to-equity ratio, increase our interest expense and decrease earnings per share, and make it difficult for us to obtain favorable financing for other acquisitions or capital investments.  
 
We need access to borrowed funds to grow, and any default by us under our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and liquidity .
 
A substantial part of our growth historically has been the result of acquisitions and capital expansion.  We anticipate additional acquisitions and capital expansion in the future.  As a result, our inability to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures through borrowed funds could restrict our ability to expand.  Moreover, any default under the documents governing our indebtedness could have a significant adverse effect on our cash flows, as well as the market value of our common stock.  
 
Our level of indebtedness and the terms of our indebtedness could adversely affect our business and liquidity position .
 

9



As described in Note 11, “Debt and Other Financing Arrangements,” as of June 27, 2015 , we had approximately $7.3 billion of total indebtedness which included a commercial paper program allowing us to issue short-term unsecured notes in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.5 billion ; a revolving credit facility supporting our United States and Canadian commercial paper programs in the amount of $1.5 billion scheduled to expire on December 29, 2018 , and various other smaller bank facilities. In July 2015, we redeemed $5.0 billion in senior notes using cash on hand and the proceeds from borrowings under our commercial paper program.   

Our indebtedness may further increase from time to time for various reasons, including fluctuations in operating results, working capital needs, capital expenditures, potential acquisitions or joint ventures, and we expect to incur additional indebtedness to fund our repurchase of up to $3 billion in Sysco common stock announced in June 2015 .  Our increased level of indebtedness and the ultimate cost of such indebtedness could have a negative impact on our liquidity, cost of future debt financing and financial results, and our credit ratings may be adversely affected as a result of the incurrence of additional indebtedness.  In the future, our cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on and principal of our debt, and any alternative financing measures available may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. 
 
Our liquidity can be negatively impacted by payments required to appeal tax assessments with certain tax jurisdictions .  
 
Certain tax jurisdictions require partial to full payment of audit assessments or the posting of letters of credit in order to proceed to the appeals process.  Sysco has posted approximately $90 million in letters of credit to appeal the Canadian Revenue Agency assessments of transfer pricing adjustments relating to our cross border procurement activities through our former purchasing cooperative on our 2004 through 2009 fiscal years.    If assessed on later years currently under examination using these same positions, we could have to pay cash or post additional letters of credit of as much as $16 million , in order to appeal these further assessments.  If significant further payments are required, the company’s financial condition or cash flows could be adversely affected.    

We rely on technology in our business and any technology disruption or delay in implementing new technology could have a material negative impact on our business .  
 
Our ability to decrease costs and increase profits, as well as our ability to serve customers most effectively, depends on the reliability of our technology network.  We use software and other technology systems, among other things, to generate and select orders, to load and route trucks, to make purchases, manage our warehouses and to monitor and manage our business on a day-to-day basis.  Any disruption to these computer systems could adversely affect our customer service, decrease the volume of our business and result in increased costs and lower profits.
 
Furthermore, process changes will be required as we continue to use our existing warehousing, delivery, and payroll systems to support operations as we implement an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system.  While Sysco has invested and continues to invest in technology security initiatives and disaster recovery plans, these measures cannot fully insulate us from technology disruption that could result in adverse effects on operations and profits.
 
A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could negatively affect our business and our relationships with customers .  
 
We use technology in substantially all aspects of our business operations.  We also use mobile devices, social networking and other online activities to connect with our employees, suppliers, business partners and our customers.  Such uses give rise to cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information.  Our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and intellectual property, including customers’ and suppliers' personal information, private information about employees, and financial and strategic information about the company and its business partners.  Further, as the company pursues its strategy to grow through acquisitions and to pursue new initiatives that improve our operations and cost structure, the company is also expanding and improving its information technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity risk.  If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with acquisitions and new initiatives, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks.  Additionally, while we have implemented measures to prevent security breaches and cyber incidents, our preventative measures and incident response efforts may not be entirely effective.  The theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our information technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result in business disruption, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of customers, potential liability and competitive disadvantage.
 
We may be required to pay material amounts under multiemployer defined benefit pension plans .
 

10



We contribute to several multiemployer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.  Approximately 10% of our current employees are participants in such multiemployer plans.  In fiscal 2015 , our total contributions to these plans were approximately $38.1 million , which included payments for withdrawal liabilities of $1.4 million .  The costs of providing benefits through such plans have increased in recent years.  The amount of any increase or decrease in our required contributions to these multiemployer plans will depend upon many factors, including the outcome of collective bargaining, actions taken by trustees who manage the plans, government regulations, the actual return on assets held in the plans and the potential payment of a withdrawal liability if we choose to exit.  Based upon the information available to us from plan administrators, we believe that several of these multiemployer plans are underfunded.  The unfunded liabilities of these plans may result in increased future payments by us and the other participating employers.  Underfunded multiemployer pension plans may impose a surcharge requiring additional pension contributions.  Our risk of such increased payments may be greater if any of the participating employers in these underfunded plans withdraws from the plan due to insolvency and is not able to contribute an amount sufficient to fund the unfunded liabilities associated with its participants in the plan.  Based on the latest information available from plan administrators, we estimate our share of the aggregate withdrawal liability on the multiemployer plans in which we participate could have been as much as $245 million as of June 27, 2015 .  A significant increase to funding requirements could adversely affect the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Our funding requirements for our company-sponsored qualified pension plan may increase should financial markets experience future declines .
 
At the end of fiscal 2012, we decided to freeze future benefit accruals under the company-sponsored qualified pension plan (Retirement Plan) as of December 31, 2012 for all U.S. based salaried and non-union hourly employees.  Effective January 1, 2013, these employees were eligible for additional contributions under an enhanced, defined contribution plan.  While these actions will serve to limit future growth in our pension liabilities, we had a sizable pension obligation of $3.2 billion as of June 27, 2015 ; therefore, financial market factors could impact our funding requirements.  Although recent pension funding relief legislation has served to defer some required funding, additional contributions may be required if our plan is not fully funded when the provisions that provided the relief are phased out.  See Note 14, “Company-Sponsored Employee Benefit Plans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a discussion of the funded status of the Retirement Plan.    

The amount of our annual contribution to the Retirement Plan is dependent upon, among other things, the returns on the Retirement Plan’s assets and discount rates used to calculate the plan’s liability.  Our Retirement Plan holds investments in both equity and fixed income securities.  Fluctuations in asset values can cause the amount of our anticipated future contributions to the plan to increase.  The projected liability of the Retirement Plan will be impacted by the fluctuations of interest rates on high quality bonds in the public markets as these are inputs in determining our minimum funding requirements.  Specifically, decreases in these interest rates may have an adverse effect on our funding obligations.  To the extent financial markets experience future declines similar to those experienced in fiscal 2008 through the beginning of fiscal 2010, and/or interest rates on high quality bonds in the public markets decline, our required contributions may increase for future years as our funded status decreases, which could have an adverse effect on our liquidity. 
 
Failure to successfully renegotiate union contracts could result in work stoppages .
 
As of June 27, 2015 , approximately 9,446  employees at 55 operating companies were members of 58 different local unions associated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and other labor organizations.  In fiscal 2016 , 24  agreements covering approximately 3,500  employees have expired or will expire.  Failure of our operating companies to effectively renegotiate these contracts could result in work stoppages.  Although our operating subsidiaries have not experienced any significant labor disputes or work stoppages to date, and we believe they have satisfactory relationships with their unions, a work stoppage due to failure of multiple operating subsidiaries to renegotiate union contracts could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
A shortage of qualified labor could negatively affect our business and materially reduce earnings .
 
The future success of our operations, including the achievement of our strategic objectives, depends on our ability to identify, recruit, develop and retain qualified and talented individuals, and any shortage of qualified labor could significantly affect our business.  Our employee recruitment, development and retention efforts may not be successful, resulting in a shortage of qualified individuals in future periods.  Any such shortage would decrease Sysco’s ability to effectively serve our customers and achieve our strategic objectives.  Such a shortage would also likely lead to higher wages for employees and a corresponding reduction in our net earnings.

11




Our authorized preferred stock provides anti-takeover benefits that may not be viewed as beneficial to stockholders .

Under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Sysco’s Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 1,500,000  shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval.  Issuance of these shares could make it more difficult for anyone to acquire Sysco without approval of the Board of Directors, depending on the rights and preferences of the stock issued.  In addition, if anyone attempts to acquire Sysco without approval of the Board of Directors of Sysco, the existence of this undesignated preferred stock could allow the Board of Directors to adopt a shareholder rights plan without obtaining stockholder approval, which could result in substantial dilution to a potential acquirer.  As a result, hostile takeover attempts that might result in an acquisition of Sysco, which could otherwise have been financially beneficial to our stockholders, could be deterred.
Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.

12



Item 2.  Properties
 
The table below shows the number of distribution facilities occupied by Sysco in each state, province or country and the aggregate square footage devoted to cold and dry storage as of June 27, 2015
Location
Number of Facilities
 
Cold Storage
(Square Feet in thousands)
 
Dry Storage
(Square Feet in thousands)
 
Segment Served*
Alabama
2

 
185

 
131

 
BL
Alaska
1

 
41

 
28

 
BL
Arizona
1

 
228

 
140

 
BL
Arkansas
2

 
130

 
88

 
BL, O
California
17

 
1,414

 
1,273

 
BL, S, O
Colorado
4

 
275

 
213

 
BL, S, O
Connecticut
3

 
156

 
110

 
BL, O
District of Columbia
2

 
52

 
42

 
O
Florida
15

 
1,236

 
974

 
BL, S, O
Georgia
5

 
267

 
416

 
BL, S, O
Idaho
3

 
95

 
92

 
BL, O
Illinois
6

 
410

 
411

 
BL, S, O
Indiana
1

 
100

 
109

 
BL
Iowa
1

 
93

 
95

 
BL
Kansas
1

 
177

 
171

 
BL
Kentucky
1

 
91

 
106

 
BL
Louisiana
1

 
134

 
113

 
BL
Maine
1

 
58

 
50

 
BL
Maryland
2

 
318

 
255

 
BL
Massachusetts
1

 
218

 
188

 
BL
Michigan
3

 
320

 
300

 
BL, S
Minnesota
3

 
233

 
195

 
BL
Mississippi
1

 
95

 
69

 
BL
Missouri
2

 
105

 
95

 
BL, S
Montana
1

 
121

 
121

 
BL
Nebraska
1

 
144

 
129

 
BL
Nevada
3

 
199

 
154

 
BL, O
New Jersey
5

 
143

 
502

 
BL, O
New Mexico
1

 
121

 
108

 
BL
New York
4

 
417

 
361

 
BL, O
North Carolina
6

 
325

 
308

 
BL, S, O
North Dakota
1

 
46

 
59

 
BL
Ohio
7

 
407

 
475

 
BL, S, O
Oklahoma
3

 
189

 
152

 
BL, S, O
Oregon
3

 
176

 
156

 
BL, S, O
Pennsylvania
5

 
542

 
405

 
BL, S
Rhode Island
1

 
2

 

 
O
South Carolina
1

 
191

 
98

 
BL
Tennessee
5

 
406

 
426

 
BL, O
Texas
18

 
1,130

 
1,241

 
BL, S, O
Utah
1

 
161

 
107

 
BL
Virginia
3

 
628

 
419

 
BL, O
Washington
1

 
134

 
92

 
BL
Wisconsin
3

 
287

 
299

 
BL, O
Bahamas
1

 
90

 
23

 
BL
Alberta, Canada
3

 
207

 
199

 
O
British Columbia, Canada
8

 
309

 
279

 
BL, O

13



Location
Number of Facilities
 
Cold Storage
(Square Feet in thousands)
 
Dry Storage
(Square Feet in thousands)
 
Segment Served*
Manitoba, Canada
1

 
79

 
74

 
BL
New Brunswick, Canada
2

 
57

 
46

 
BL
Newfoundland, Canada
1

 
33

 
41

 
BL
Nova Scotia, Canada
1

 
39

 
47

 
BL
Ontario, Canada
12

 
602

 
525

 
BL, O
Quebec, Canada
7

 
129

 
245

 
BL, O
Saskatchewan, Canada
1

 
40

 
54

 
BL
Ireland
6

 
230

 
149

 
BL
Northern Ireland
1

 
2

 
8

 
BL
Puerto Rico
1

 
8

 

 
O
Totals
197

 
14,025

 
12,966

 
 
 
*  Segments served include Broadline (BL), SYGMA (S), and Other (O).
 
We own approximately 22,384,000 square feet of our distribution facilities (or 82.9% of the total square feet), and the remainder is occupied under leases expiring at various dates from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2032 , exclusive of renewal options. 
 
We own our approximately 625,000 square foot headquarters office complex in Houston, Texas.  In addition, we own our approximately 669,000 square foot shared services complex in Cypress, Texas.
 
We are currently constructing expansions, replacement or fold-out facilities for our distribution facilities in Maryland, Virginia, and Texas .  These operating companies, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 1% of fiscal 2015 sales.
 
As of June 27, 2015 , our fleet of approximately 9,600 delivery vehicles consisted of tractor and trailer combinations, vans and panel trucks, most of which are either wholly or partially refrigerated for the transportation of frozen or perishable foods.  We own approximately 95% of these vehicles and lease the remainder.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the company announced an agreement to merge with US Foods, Inc. (US Foods).  In February 2015, following completion of its regulatory review of the proposed merger, the US Federal Trade Commission filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (the Court) seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the parties from closing the merger, which the Court granted on June 23, 2015.  On June 26, 2015, the parties terminated the merger agreement.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.

PART II
Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
 
The principal market for Sysco’s common stock (SYY) is the New York Stock Exchange.  The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices per share for our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape and the cash dividends declared for the periods indicated.

14



 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends
 
 
Common Stock Prices
 
Declared
 
 
High
 
Low
 
Per Share
Fiscal 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
36.05

 
$
31.37

 
$
0.28

Second Quarter
 
43.40

 
31.13

 
0.29

Third Quarter
 
37.08

 
34.07

 
0.29

Fourth Quarter
 
37.92

 
35.31

 
0.29

Fiscal 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
38.85

 
$
35.50

 
$
0.29

Second Quarter
 
41.16

 
35.82

 
0.30

Third Quarter
 
41.45

 
37.81

 
0.30

Fourth Quarter
 
38.99

 
35.84

 
0.30

 
The number of record owners of Sysco’s common stock as of August 13, 2015 was  10,877 .
    
We made the following share repurchases during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 :
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
 
(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
 
(b) Average Price Paid per Share
 
(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
(d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 29 – April 25
 
5,168

 
$
38.16

 

 
11,655,197

Month #2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
April 26 – May 23
 
805

 
36.61

 

 
11,655,197

Month #3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
May 24 – June 27
 
2,012

 
37.58

 

 
11,655,197

Total
 
7,985

 
$
37.86

 

 
11,655,197

 
 (1) The shares purchased in all 3 months represented shares tendered by individuals in connection with stock option exercises.
 
The remaining authorization to purchase 11,655,197 shares from the repurchase program, included in the table above, expired on August 23, 2015 . In June 2015, our Board of Directors approved a repurchase program to repurchase from time to time in the open market, through an accelerated share repurchase program or through privately negotiated transactions, shares of the company's common stock in an amount not to exceed $3.0 billion during the two year period ending July 1, 2017 , including $1.5 billion through a planned accelerated share repurchase in fiscal 2016, in addition to amounts normally repurchased to offset benefit plan and stock option dilution. In addition to this share repurchase program approved in June, in August 2015 , our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $800 million .  The authorization expires on August 21, 2017 .  Pursuant to the repurchase program, shares may be acquired in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at the company’s discretion, subject to market conditions and other factors.

The Board of Directors has authorized us to enter into agreements from time to time to extend our ongoing repurchase program to include repurchases during company announced “blackout periods” of such securities in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
 
Stock Performance Graph
 
The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, each as amended, except to the extent that Sysco specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing.
 
The following stock performance graph compares the performance of Sysco’s Common Stock to the S&P 500 Index and to the S&P 500 Food/Staple Retail Index for Sysco’s last five fiscal years.

15



 
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P 500 Food/Staple Retail Index was $100 on the last trading day of fiscal 2010, and that all dividends were reinvested.  Performance data for Sysco, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Food/Staple Retail Index is provided as of the last trading day of each of our last five fiscal years.
 
7/3/2010
7/2/2011
6/30/2012
6/29/2013
6/28/2014
6/27/2015
Sysco Corporation
$100
$129
$148
$145
$172
$197
S&P 500
100
114
152
158
190
237
S&P 500 Food/Staple Retail Index
100
101
131
151
183
221


16



Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
 
 
Fiscal Year
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(In thousands except for per share data)
Sales
 
$
48,680,752

 
$
46,516,712

 
$
44,411,233

 
$
42,380,939

 
$
39,323,489

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (1)
 
1,229,362

 
1,587,122

 
1,658,478

 
1,890,632

 
1,931,502

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings before income taxes (1)
 
1,008,147

 
1,475,624

 
1,547,455

 
1,784,002

 
1,827,454

Income taxes (1)
 
321,374

 
544,091

 
555,028

 
662,417

 
675,424

Net earnings (1)
 
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

 
$
1,121,585

 
$
1,152,030

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share (1)
 
$
1.16

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.68

 
$
1.91

 
$
1.96

Diluted earnings per share (1)
 
1.15

 
1.58

 
1.67

 
1.90

 
1.96

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared per share
 
$
1.19

 
$
1.15

 
$
1.11

 
$
1.07

 
$
1.03

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
17,989,281

 
$
13,141,113

 
$
12,678,208

 
$
12,137,207

 
$
11,427,190

Capital expenditures
 
542,830

 
523,206

 
511,862

 
784,501

 
636,442

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current maturities of long-term debt (2)
 
$
4,979,301

 
$
304,777

 
$
207,301

 
$
254,650

 
$
207,031

Long-term debt
 
2,271,825

 
2,357,330

 
2,627,544

 
2,749,304

 
2,268,204

Total long-term debt
 
7,251,126

 
2,662,107

 
2,834,845

 
3,003,954

 
2,475,235

Shareholders’ equity
 
5,260,224

 
5,266,695

 
5,191,810

 
4,685,040

 
4,705,242

Total capitalization
 
$
12,511,350

 
$
7,928,802

 
$
8,026,655

 
$
7,688,994

 
$
7,180,477

Ratio of long-term debt to
capitalization (2)
 
58.0
%
 
33.6
%
 
35.3
%
 
39.1
%
 
34.5
%

(1) Our results of operations are impacted by Certain Items, that have resulted in reduced earnings on a GAAP basis. See “Non-GAAP Reconciliations,” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for our results on an adjusted basis that exclude Certain Items.

(2) As discussed in Note 11, "Debt and Other Financing Arrangements," our current maturities of long-term debt include senior notes issued for the proposed merger with US Foods that were required to be redeemed due to the termination of the merger agreement. We redeemed these notes in July 2015.
    
Our financial results are impacted by accounting changes and the adoption of various accounting standards. See Note 2, "Changes in Accounting" to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Our discussion below of our results includes certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe provide important perspective with respect to underlying business trends and results and provides meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors that is indicative of the performance of the company’s underlying operations and facilitates comparison on a year-over-year basis.  Other than free cash flow, any non-GAAP financial measures will be denoted as adjusted measures and exclude the impact from multiemployer pension withdrawal charges, severance charges, integration planning, litigation costs and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed with U.S. Foods, Inc. (US Foods), facility closure charges and US Foods related financing costs. Additional items in fiscal 2014 include a change in estimate of self-insurance, and charges from a contingency accrual. These fiscal 2015 and 2014 items are collectively referred to as (Certain Items).  Our US Foods financing costs include the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs when our bridge acquisition facility was terminated upon the issuance of our senior notes in October 2014 and interest expense on those senior notes.  In fiscal 2014 , costs from executive

17



retirement plans restructuring were included within Certain Items; however, because these costs in fiscal 2015 are comparable to fiscal 2014 , these were not included in the Certain Items definition for the comparison of adjusted results for fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 . This continues to be presented as a Certain Item in the comparison of adjusted results for fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . More information on the rationale for the use of these measures and reconciliations to GAAP numbers can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” and "Liquidity and Capital Resources."
 
Overview
 
Sysco distributes food and related products to restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments and other foodservice customers.  Our primary operations are located throughout the United States (U.S.), Bahamas, Canada, Costa Rica, Ireland and Mexico and include broadline companies, SYGMA (our chain restaurant distribution subsidiary), specialty produce companies, custom-cut meat companies, hotel supply operations, a company that distributes specialty imported products, a company that distributes to international customers and our Sysco Ventures platform, which includes our suite of technology solutions that help support the business needs of our customers.
 
We consider our primary market to be the foodservice market in the U.S., Canada and Ireland and estimate that we serve about 17.7% of this approximately $264 billion annual market based on a measurement as of the end of calendar 2014 .  We use industry data obtained from various sources including Technomic, Inc., the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association and the Irish Food Board to calculate this measurement.  According to industry sources, the foodservice, or food-away-from-home, market represents approximately 48% of the total dollars spent on food purchases made at the consumer level in the U.S. as of the end of calendar 2014 .
 
Industry sources estimate the total foodservice market in the U.S. experienced a real sales increase of approximately 0.7% in calendar year 2014 and  1.1% in calendar year 2013 .  Real sales changes do not include the impact of inflation or deflation.
 
Highlights

The foodservice industry performance in fiscal 2015 was generally improved. Consumer confidence and the outlook of foodservice operators are at high levels, but have decreased slightly in the summer months of 2015 . Fuel prices declined during fiscal 2015 and are currently at lower levels, as compared to recent years, that may support higher consumer spending in the future. Spending at restaurants is generally improved, but customer traffic levels are generally unchanged. Overall, the market environment appears to be modestly improved as compared to the prior two years; however, uncertainty in industry growth remains for fiscal 2016 . Amid these conditions, we provided our customers with excellent service, growing our business with both our locally and corporate managed customers and stabilizing our gross margins by successfully implementing several value-added commercial initiatives. We improved our expense management performance as the year progressed, achieving greater success managing expenses in the second half of the year as compared to the first half.  The impact of Certain Items contributed to lower earnings in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 , primarily from the costs associated with the merger that had been proposed with US Foods.   
 
Comparison of results from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 :
 
Sales increased 4.7% , or $2.2 billion to $48.7 billion ;
Gross profit increased 4.5% , or $370.5 million to $8.6 billion ;
Operating income decreased 22.5% , or $0.4 billion , to $1.2 billion ;
Adjusted operating income increased 3.4% , or $58.2 million , to $1.8 billion ;
Net earnings decreased 26.3% , or $244.8 million , to $0.7 billion ;
Adjusted net earnings increased 6.4% , or $66.3 million , to $1.1 billion ;
Basic earnings per share in fiscal 2015 was $1.16 , a 27% decrease from the comparable prior year period amount of  $1.59 per share.  Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2015 was $1.15 , a 27.2% decrease from the comparable prior year period amount of $1.58 per share; and
Adjusted diluted earnings per share was $1.84 in fiscal 2015 , a 5.1% increase from the comparable prior year amount of  $1.75 per share.

See “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for an explanation of these non-GAAP financial measures.

Business Transformation
 
In fiscal 2015 , we completed the three-year financial objectives of our Business Transformation. These financial objectives were largely designed to lower our product cost and lower our operating cost structure. We implemented a category management

18



program to leverage our scale and develop deeper, more strategic relationships with our suppliers to drive growth and innovation. We also implemented multiple initiatives to lower our operating cost structure including a more streamlined and standard approach to the management of fleet, labor, maintenance, procurement and supplies. Our goal for the project was to generate approximately $550 million to $650 million in annual benefits to be achieved by fiscal 2015 . We exceeded our final three-year target for annualized benefits.
US Foods Merger Termination
 
We sought to merge with US Foods, a leading foodservice distributor in the U.S. The merger was reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and in February 2015, the FTC commissioners voted 3 to 2 to authorize the FTC staff to seek a preliminary injunction from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia preventing the parties from closing the merger. In June 2015, the preliminary injunction was granted. Shortly thereafter, the parties involved agreed to terminate the merger agreement, as a result of which Sysco was obligated to pay $300 million to the owners of US Foods. During the review period with the FTC, Sysco created a divestiture package, comprised of the sale of 11 US Foods facilities to Performance Food Group (PFG), which was contingent on the closing of the merger. This divestiture agreement entitled PFG to receive a $25 million termination fee if the sale of the divestiture package was terminated before July 6, 2015, with each of Sysco and US Foods responsible for one half of the applicable fee. Sysco accrued for termination payments totaling $312.5 million in fiscal 2015 and paid these amounts in fiscal 2016 .

The following tables outline our expenses attributable to our integration planning, litigation and termination costs and financing activities, for the periods presented:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Operating expense
$
554,667

 
$
90,571

Interest expense
 
138,422

 
 
6,790

Total
$
693,089

 
$
97,361

  
Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions

Mayca Distribuidores

In the first quarter of fiscal 2015 , we acquired a 50% interest in Mayca Distribuidores (Mayca) of Costa Rica and three other affiliates. Mayca, which has been in business since 1995, is a leading food distributor across Costa Rica. In addition to its distribution business, Mayca has a retail cash-and-carry affiliate with multiple locations, a cold-storage company and a truck-leasing company.

Pacific Star Foodservice

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 , we acquired a 50% interest in Pacific Star Foodservice, a leading foodservice distributor in Mexico. Pacific Star has operated since 1989 with distribution centers servicing Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey and Tijuana and primarily services chain restaurants, including fast food and casual dining restaurants, casinos, theme parks, movie theaters and hotels throughout Mexico.

Tannis Foodservice

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 , we acquired Tannis Trading, Inc., a broadline foodservice distributor in Ottawa, Ontario. Tannis has a 75-year history of providing quality service to customers in Ottawa, Canada's fourth-largest metropolitan market, and the surrounding areas.

 
Trends and Strategy
 
Trends
 
General economic conditions can affect the frequency of purchases and amounts spent by consumers for food-away-from-home and, in turn, can impact our customers and our sales.  Consumer confidence and employment metrics, such as

19



unemployment rates, have shown some signs of improvement during fiscal 2015 ; however, consumer spending has been cautious. Fuel prices are currently at lower levels, as compared to recent years, that may support higher consumer spending in the future. Overall, the market environment appears to be modestly improved as compared to the prior two years; however, uncertainty in industry growth remains for fiscal 2016. One industry resource, Technomic, Inc., has projected roughly 2% real growth annually. Real growth excludes the impact of inflation or deflation.

Our sales and gross profit performance can be influenced by multiple factors including price, volume and product mix. The modest level of growth in the foodservice market has created additional competitive pricing pressures, which is, in turn, negatively impacting sales and gross profits. Case growth with our locally-managed Broadline business is an important contributor to gross profit dollar growth. Our locally-managed customers, including independent restaurant customers, comprise a significant portion of our overall volumes and an even greater percentage of profitability due to the high level of value added services we typically provide to this customer group. Through focused efforts, our locally-managed case volume growth has accelerated over the past three years. Our sales to corporate-managed customers, including chain restaurants and multi-locational restaurants, also comprise a significant portion of our overall volumes. Gross margin on sales to our corporate-managed customers is generally lower than sales to other types of customers due to the higher volumes we sell to these customers. Case growth for our corporate-managed customers remained strong, but competitive pricing pressure has constrained our gross margins. Inflation is a factor that contributes to the level of sales and gross profit growth and can be a factor that contributes to gross margin pressure. Food cost inflation in fiscal 2015 was 3.7% , an increase from 2.1% experienced in fiscal 2014 . Our inflation rates were higher in the first half of fiscal 2015 , reaching levels of 6.0% at the mid-point of the fiscal year and dropping to 0.1% by the end of the fiscal year. While we cannot predict whether inflation will continue at current levels, periods of high inflation, either overall or in certain product categories, can have a negative effect on us and our customers. High food costs can be difficult to pass on to our customers. In addition, rapid declines in prices can make it challenging to leverage our fixed costs. Our category management initiative has helped us to manage our gross margin performance in response to several of these factors. Lastly, changes in foreign exchange rates are having a larger impact on our sales as compared to recent fiscal years. The strengthening U.S. dollar is depressing our foreign sales as we convert them to U.S. dollars. The impact of foreign exchange rates for fiscal 2015 was a 1.0% year-over-year decrease to sales growth. This impact has typically been in the range of 0% to 0.5% .

We have experienced higher operating expenses in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 , primarily from increased payroll costs and integration planning, litigation and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed with US Foods. We anticipate a low level of operating expenses attributable to the merger termination in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 . Our payroll costs have been influenced by higher pay in our sales organization as a result of higher gross profits, investment in new administrative support capabilities, higher management incentive accruals due to improved performance against our incentive targets and companies acquired within the last 12 months. Sales and gross profit growth partially contributed to an increase in sales pay-related expenses due to increases in sales commissions and bonuses. In addition, we have increased our marketing associate headcount in certain markets in order to invest in future sales growth.

In October 2014 , we secured long-term financing for the proposed merger with US Foods; therefore, interest expense increased in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 . The October 2014 senior notes contained mandatory redemption features providing that, if the merger agreement were terminated on or prior to October 8, 2015 , we were required to redeem all of the senior notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal of the senior notes plus accrued interest. In June 2015 , we terminated the merger agreement and redeemed the senior notes in July 2015 using cash on hand and the proceeds from borrowings under our commercial paper facility. In fiscal 2016 , we will recognize several charges from the redemption of these senior notes including $50.0 million in premium fees, $29 million in unamortized debt issuance costs and $18.0 million in unamortized bond discounts each of which had resulted from the issuance of the senior notes in October 2014 . We had hedged $1.25 billion of this debt by swapping the fixed rates to floating rates with the goal of reducing overall borrowing cost.  We terminated these swaps in July 2015 and will recognize a gain of $10.0 million from the fair value adjustment that had been recorded on the underlying debt. Our interest expense on the notes was treated as a Certain Item in fiscal 2015 , since the proposed merger had not closed. Similarly, these charges and gain associated with the repayment of these notes will be presented as Certain Items in fiscal 2016 . As discussed in Note 9, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” two forward starting swap agreements used to hedge interest rate risk exposure on our October 2014 senior notes issuance were previously terminated and were paid in the amount of $188.8 million . The resulting amounts recorded as a loss are currently amortizing into interest expense at a rate of $2.5 million per quarter for the next 9 years and $1.1 million per quarter thereafter for another 19 years .  These amounts will continue to amortize into interest expense as the amount hedged is anticipated to remain within our capital structure. 

Following the termination of the merger agreement, we announced a $3 billion , two -year share repurchase program. We intend to execute the first half of this program through an accelerated repurchase program near the end of first quarter of fiscal 2016 . We expect to issue $2.0 billion of debt at approximately the same time and we intend to use a majority of the proceeds to fund these repurchases. These actions will lower our basic and diluted shares outstanding providing an expected earnings per share benefit of approximately $0.03 to $0.04 per share. This estimate includes a 4% to 5% reduction in average shares outstanding,

20



partially offset by higher interest expense from the new debt issuance. Because the share repurchase will take place near the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we will not realize a full-year's benefit from the reduction in shares in fiscal 2016; however, the full-year benefit will be realized in fiscal 2017.

Sysco’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to June 30 th .  We will have a 53-week year ending July 2, 2016 for fiscal 2016 , and this additional week will be presented as a Certain Item in fiscal 2016 .

 Strategy
 
We are focused on optimizing our core broadline business in the U.S., Bahamas, Canada, Costa Rica, Ireland and Mexico, while continuing to explore appropriate opportunities to profitably grow our market share and create shareholder value by expanding beyond our core business.  Day-to-day, our business decisions are driven by our mission to market and deliver great products to our customers with exceptional service, with the aspirational vision of becoming each of our customers’ most valued and trusted business partner.  We have identified five components of our strategy to help us achieve our mission and vision as follows:
Profoundly enrich the experience of doing business with Sysco:  Our primary focus is to help our customers succeed.  We believe that by building on our current competitive advantages, we will be able to further differentiate our offering to customers.  Our competitive advantages include our sales force of over 7,300 marketing associates; our diversified product base, which includes quality-assured Sysco brand products; the suite of services we provide to our customers such as business reviews and menu analysis; and our multi-regional presence in the U.S. and Canada.  In addition, we have a portfolio of businesses spanning broadline, chain restaurant distribution, specialty produce, specialty meat, hotel amenities, specialty import and export which serves our customers’ needs across a wide array of business segments.  Through our Sysco Ventures platform, we are developing a suite of technology solutions that help support the administrative needs of our customers.  We believe this strategy of enriching the experience of doing business with Sysco will increase customer retention and profitably accelerate sales growth with both existing and new customers.
Continuously improve productivity in all areas of our business:  We continually strive to improve productivity and reduce costs.  From implementing an integrated software system to leveraging the power of our end-to-end supply chain, we continue to look for ways to improve our service to our customers and lower costs. 
Expand our portfolio of products and services by initiating a customer-centric innovation program:  We continually explore opportunities to provide new and improved products, technologies and services to our customers.  
Explore, assess and pursue new businesses and markets: This strategy is focused on identifying opportunities to expand the core business through growth in new international markets and in adjacent areas that complement our core foodservice distribution business.  As a part of our ongoing strategic analysis, we regularly evaluate business opportunities, including potential acquisitions, joint ventures and sales of assets and businesses.
Develop and effectively integrate a comprehensive, enterprise-wide talent management process:  Our ability to drive results and grow our business is directly linked to having the best talent in the industry.  We are committed to the continued enhancement of our talent management programs in terms of how we recruit, select, train and develop our associates throughout Sysco, as well as succession planning.  Our ultimate objective is to provide our associates with outstanding opportunities for professional growth and career development.  

In fiscal 2016 , to further our strategy, we see opportunities to further accelerate case growth, especially with our locally-managed sales customers through improved product and service differentiation combined with enhanced sales and technology capabilities. We will continue to build on our success in stabilizing gross margin through enhanced product innovation, growing privately-branded product sales and improving pricing analytics and support. There continues to be opportunity to improve our productivity and reduce overhead costs in our supply chain organization and administrative areas of our business. We will continue to invest in our business to fully realize the benefits and improve our return on invested capital.


Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated results of operations expressed as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated:

21



 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Sales
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
Cost of sales
82.4

 
82.4

 
82.0

Gross profit
17.6

 
17.6

 
18.0

Operating expenses
15.0

 
14.2

 
14.3

Operating income
2.6

 
3.4

 
3.7

Interest expense
0.5

 
0.2

 
0.3

Other expense (income), net
(0.1
)
 
(0.0
)
 
(0.0
)
Earnings before income taxes
2.2

 
3.2

 
3.4

Income taxes
0.7

 
1.2

 
1.2

Net earnings
1.5
 %
 
2.0
 %
 
2.2
 %
 
The following table sets forth the change in the components of our consolidated results of operations expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the prior year:
 
2015
 
2014
Sales
4.7
 %
 
4.7
 %
Cost of sales
4.7

 
5.3

Gross profit
4.5

 
2.3

Operating expenses
11.0

 
4.0

Operating income
(22.5
)
 
(4.3
)
Interest expense
105.9

 
(3.7
)
Other expense (income), net (1)
174.4

 
(29.9
)
Earnings before income taxes
(31.7
)
 
(4.6
)
Income taxes
(40.9
)
 
(2.0
)
Net earnings
(26.3
)%
 
(6.1
)%
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share
(27.0
)%
 
(5.4
)%
Diluted earnings per share
(27.2
)
 
(5.4
)
 
 
 
 
Average shares outstanding
1.0

 
(0.6
)
Diluted shares outstanding
1.1

 
(0.4
)
 
(1) Other expense (income), net was income of $33.6 million in fiscal 2015 , $12.2 million in fiscal 2014 and $17.5 million in fiscal 2013 .
 
Sales
 
Sales for fiscal 2015 were 4.7% higher than fiscal 2014 .  Sales for fiscal 2015 increased as a result of product cost inflation and the corresponding increase in selling prices, case volume growth, and sales from acquisitions that occurred within the last 12 months.  Changes in product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as inflation of 3.7% during fiscal 2015 , driven mainly by inflation in the meat, seafood and dairy categories.  Case volumes including acquisitions within the last 12 months improved 2.6% in fiscal 2015 .  Case volumes excluding acquisitions within the last 12 months improved 2.4% in fiscal 2015 .  Our case volumes represent our results from our Broadline and SYGMA segments combined.  Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably impacted sales by 0.6% in fiscal 2015 .  The changes in the exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars negatively impacted sales by 1.0% in fiscal 2015
 
Sales for fiscal 2014 were 4.7% higher than fiscal 2013 .  Sales for fiscal 2014 increased as a result of product cost inflation and the resulting increase in selling prices, sales from acquisitions that occurred within the last 12 months and case volume growth.  Our sales growth in fiscal 2014 was greater with our corporate-managed customers as compared to sales growth with our locally-managed customers.  We believe our locally-managed customer sales growth was negatively influenced by less favorable consumer sentiment.  Case volumes excluding acquisitions within the last 12 months improved 2.2% in fiscal 2014 .  Our case volumes represent our results from our Broadline and SYGMA segments combined.  Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably impacted sales by 1.4% % for fiscal 2014 .  Case volumes including acquisitions within the last 12 months

22



improved approximately 3.4% in fiscal 2014 .  Changes in product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as inflation of 2.1% during fiscal 2014 .  The changes in the exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars did not have a significant impact on sales when compared to fiscal 2013
 
Operating Income
 
Cost of sales primarily includes our product costs, net of vendor consideration, and includes in-bound freight.  Operating expenses include the costs of facilities, product handling, delivery, selling and general and administrative activities.  Fuel surcharges are reflected within sales and gross profit; fuel costs are reflected within operating expenses.
 
Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014
 
The following table sets forth the change in the components of operating income and adjusted operating income expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the prior year:
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Gross profit
$
8,551,516

 
$
8,181,035

 
$
370,481

 
4.5
 %
Operating expenses
7,322,154

 
6,593,913

 
$
728,241

 
11.0
 %
Operating income
$
1,229,362

 
$
1,587,122

 
$
(357,760
)
 
(22.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
$
8,551,516

 
$
8,181,035

 
$
370,481

 
4.5
 %
Adjusted operating expenses (Non-GAAP)
6,759,687

 
6,447,405

 
$
312,282

 

Adjusted operating income (Non-GAAP)
$
1,791,829

 
$
1,733,630

 
$
58,199

 
3.4
 %
 
The decrease in operating income was impacted by an increase of $416.0 million in operating expenses attributable to Certain Items.  Adjusted operating income increased due to gross profit dollar growth partially offset by increased expenses from greater case volumes, higher incentive accruals, higher pay for our sales organization as a result of higher gross profit, investment in administrative support capabilities and acquired operations.

Gross profit dollars increased in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 primarily due to increased sales volumes, stronger relative mix of sales to our locally-managed customers and benefits from category management.  Gross margin, which is gross profit as a percentage of sales, was 17.57% in fiscal 2015 , a decline of 2 basis points from the gross margin of 17.59% in fiscal 2014 .  Increased competition resulting from a slow-growth market and volatile inflation has pressured our gross margins; however, sales and mix, as well as our category management initiative have helped us stabilize our gross margin performance.  Inflation in fiscal 2015 was 3.7% , an increase from 2.1% experienced in fiscal 2014 . Our inflation rates were higher in the first half of fiscal 2015 , reaching 6.0% at the mid-point of the fiscal year and dropping to 0.1% by the end of the fiscal year. Fiscal 2015 inflation was seen primarily in the meat, dairy and poultry categories. 
 
Operating expenses for fiscal 2015 increased 11.0% , or $728.2 million , over fiscal 2014 .  Adjusted operating expenses for fiscal 2015 increased 4.8% , or $312.3 million , over fiscal 2014 .  These increases in adjusted operating expenses were primarily due to increased expenses from greater case volumes, higher incentive accruals, higher pay for our sales organization as a result of higher gross profit, investment in administrative support capabilities and acquired operations. Partially offsetting this increase, was a reduction in fuel costs and provisions for losses on receivables. Sysco’s operating expenses were impacted by Certain Items, which resulted in an increase in operating expenses of $416 million in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 .  More information on the rationale of the use of adjusted operating expense and adjusted operating income and reconciliations to GAAP numbers can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations.” 
 
Operating Expenses Impacting Adjusted Operating Income
 
Our operating expenses increased in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 partially due to greater case volumes, higher incentive accruals, higher pay for our sales organization as a result of higher gross profit, investment in administrative support capabilities and acquired operations.  Pay-related expenses, which represent a significant portion of our operating costs, increased by $349.3 million in fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014 .  Factors contributing to the increase in 2015 include increase in expense related to management incentive accruals of $103.5 million , higher pay in our sales organization largely as a result of higher gross profits, higher costs due to investment in new administrative support capabilities and companies acquired in the last 12 months. The

23



amounts for companies acquired within the last 12 months include our new, consolidated joint ventures, such as our 50% interest in a foodservice company in Costa Rica. Sales and gross profit growth partially contributed to an increase in sales pay-related expenses due to increases in sales commissions and bonuses. In addition, we have increased our marketing associate headcount in certain markets in order to invest in future sales growth. Our expense related to management incentive accruals will vary based on how the company’s performance compares to incentive targets. Our fiscal 2015 financial performance trended more favorably relative to the applicable management incentive targets as compared to fiscal 2014 . Consequently, expense is higher period over period.
    
Cost per case is an important metric management uses to measure our expense performance.  This metric is calculated by dividing the total operating expense of our North American Broadline companies by the number of cases sold.  Adjusted cost per case is calculated similarly; however, the operating expense component excludes severance and multiemployer pension withdrawal charges, which are the Certain Items applicable to these companies, divided by the number of cases sold.  Our corporate expenses are not included in the cost per cases metrics because the metric is a measure of efficiency in our operations.  We seek to grow our sales and either minimize or reduce our costs on a per case basis.  Our cost per case and adjusted cost per case increased $0.04 per case in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 .  The impact of foreign exchange rates lowered our cost per case results by $0.05 per case for fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014, which partially offset the rate of increase occurring primarily from increased pay-related expenses.  We are focused on driving improvement across our operations with multiple initiatives that implement best practices, enhance our operating training programs and improve our ability to measure and analyze our performance. More information on the rationale for the use of adjusted operating income and adjusted cost per case and reconciliations can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations.” 
 
Certain Items within Operating Expenses
 
Sysco’s operating expenses are impacted by Certain Items, which are expenses that can be difficult to predict, can be unanticipated or do not represent core operating expenses.  More information on the rationale for the use of these measures and reconciliations to GAAP numbers can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations.”   Our significant Certain Items applicable for fiscal 2015 included costs related to integration planning, litigation costs and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed with US Foods.  Our significant Certain Items applicable for fiscal 2014 related to costs in connection with the then proposed merger with US Foods, a change in estimate of our self-insurance reserve and a liability for a settlement.
 
We incurred costs in connection with the proposed merger with US Foods announced in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily from integration planning, litigation costs and termination costs.  These costs totaled $554.7 million in fiscal 2015 and $90.6 million in fiscal 2014 .

Our self-insurance program covers portions of workers’ compensation, general and vehicle liability and property insurance costs.  The amounts in excess of the self-insured levels are fully insured by third party insurers.  Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, medical cost trends, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.  In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, based on the historical trends of increased costs primarily attributable to our workers' compensation claims, we increase d our estimates of our self-insurance reserve to a higher point in an estimated range of liability as opposed to our past position at the lower end of the range.  This resulted in a charge of $23.8 million in fiscal 2014
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, Sysco was made aware of certain alleged violations of California law relating to its use of remote storage units in the delivery of products.  These are commonly referred to as drop sites.  As of June 28, 2014 , we recorded a liability for a settlement of $20 million .  In July 2014, Sysco agreed to a $19.4 million settlement, which includes a payment of $15.0 million in penalties, $3.3 million to fund four California Department of Public Health investigator positions for five years, a $1.0 million donation to food banks across California, and $0.1 million in legal fees.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we eliminated the use of drop sites across Sysco.  During fiscal 2014 , we introduced mandatory, annual food safety training for all employees across Sysco.  We are implementing additional and improved food safety reporting, monitoring and compliance controls across our operations to ensure adherence to our policies.


24



Fiscal 2014 vs. Fiscal 2013  
 
The following table sets forth the change in the components of operating income and adjusted operating income expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the prior year:
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Gross profit
$
8,181,035

 
$
7,996,607

 
$
184,428

 
2.3
 %
Operating expenses
6,593,913

 
6,338,129

 
255,784

 
4.0
 %
Operating income
$
1,587,122

 
$
1,658,478

 
$
(71,356
)
 
(4.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
$
8,181,035

 
$
7,996,607

 
$
184,428

 
2.3
 %
Adjusted operating expenses (Non-GAAP)
6,444,076

 
6,243,414

 
200,662

 
3.2
 %
Adjusted operating income (Non-GAAP)
$
1,736,959

 
$
1,753,193

 
$
(16,234
)
 
(0.9
)%
 
The decrease in operating income was impacted by an increase in $55.1 million in operating expenses attributable to Certain Items. Operating income and adjusted operating income for fiscal 2014 were lower than fiscal 2013 primarily from a lower rate of growth in our gross profit, increased expenses from higher case volumes, some of which is attributable to our acquired operations, increased depreciation and amortization, increased delivery costs and higher corporate expenses. These were partially offset by lower Business Transformation Project expenses and benefits from Business Transformation Project initiatives. As a percentage of sales, we experienced favorable expense management due in part to benefits from our Business Transformation Project initiatives.

Gross profit dollars increased in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due to increased sales volumes. The first half of fiscal 2014 contained weaker gross profit growth of 1.2% as compared to the same period in fiscal 2013 . Inflation and locally-managed customers case growth was lower in the first half of fiscal 2014 . Inflation increased as did local-managed customers case growth in the second half of fiscal 2014 . Gross profits grew at a greater rate of 3.4% in the second half of fiscal 2014 as compared to the same time period in fiscal 2013 as result of these factors and in part from our Business Transformation Project initiatives. Gross margin, which is gross profit as a percentage of sales, was 17.59% in fiscal 2014 , a decline of 42 basis points from the gross margin of 18.01% in fiscal 2013 . This decline in gross margin was partially the result of weak restaurant traffic and increased competition resulting from a slow-growth market. Increased sales to lower margin corporate-managed customers also contributed to the decline in fiscal 2014 . Our inflation rates were relatively stable over the first three quarters of fiscal 2014 , however it increased in the fourth quarter, all quarters being compared to the past year. Fourth quarter fiscal 2014 inflation was seen primarily in the meat, seafood and dairy categories which represent more than one-third of our annual sales.
 
     Operating expenses for fiscal 2014 increased 4.0% , or $255.8 million , over fiscal 2013 . Adjusted operating expenses for fiscal 2014 increased 3.2% , or $200.7 million , over fiscal 2013 . These increases were primarily due to increased expenses from higher case volumes, some of which is attributable to our acquired operations, increased depreciation and amortization, increased delivery costs and higher corporate expenses. These were partially offset by lower Business Transformation Project expenses and benefits from Business Transformation Project initiatives. We believe favorable expense management, partially from our Business Transformation Project initiatives, helped to keep our operating expense increases from being greater. Sysco’s operating expenses are impacted by certain charges and adjustments, which we refer to as Certain Items, and which resulted in an increase in operating expenses of $55.1 million in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 . More information on the rationale of the use of adjusted operating expenses and adjusted operating income and reconciliations to GAAP numbers can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations".
 
Operating Expenses Impacting Adjusted Operating Income
 
Our operating expenses increased in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 partially due to expenses from our acquired operations, expenses attributable to volume growth and increased delivery costs. Pay-related expenses represent a significant portion of our operating costs, contributed to the increase in each of these three categories of expenses and contributed to cost increases in our corporate expenses. Pay-related expenses, excluding labor costs associated with our Business Transformation Project, US Foods integration planning and retirement-related expenses, increased by $74.4 million in fiscal 2014 over fiscal 2013 . The increase was primarily due to costs from companies acquired in the last 12 months as well as increased delivery and warehouse compensation, partially attributable to case growth. Pay-related costs have also increased at our corporate office as certain employee costs attributed to our Business Transformation Project in fiscal 2013 were no longer attributed to the Business Transformation

25



Project in fiscal 2014 due to a change in allocation methodology. In fiscal 2013 , we allocated internal associates based upon estimates of the percentage of time they spent on the project. In fiscal 2014 , only associates that were dedicated full time to the project are included in Business Transformation Project costs. These increases were partially offset by reduced sales compensation, information technology compensation and lower provisions for management incentive plans. Benefits from our Business Transformation Project initiatives helped in lowering the rate of growth in these expenses particularly in our sales area for fiscal 2014 . During fiscal 2013 , we streamlined our sales management organization and modified marketing associate compensation plans. Fiscal 2014 was also impacted by a reduction in pay in the information technology area, resulting from the restructuring of this department in fiscal 2013 , which reduced headcount in this area.

Depreciation and amortization expense, excluding the increase related to our Business Transformation Project described below, increase d by $32.8 million in fiscal 2014 over fiscal 2013 . The increase was primarily related to depreciation on assets that were not placed in service in fiscal 2013 that were in service in fiscal 2014 .

Our retirement-related expenses consist primarily of costs from our Retirement Plan, SERP and our defined contribution plans. As a part of our Business Transformation Project initiatives, our Retirement Plan was substantially frozen and the SERP was completely frozen in fiscal 2013 , and our defined contribution plans were enhanced with greater benefits. The net impact in fiscal 2014 of our retirement-related expenses as compared to fiscal 2013 was a decrease of $86.8 million , consisting of a $133.6 million decrease in our net company-sponsored pension costs and approximately $6.2 million for other costs, partially offset by $53.0 million increase d costs from our defined contribution plans.

In addition to the increases in our corporate office expenses from pay-related expenses noted above, other sources of cost increases in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 were due to increasing the capabilities of various departments within our corporate office. A subset of our business technology costs was attributable to our Business Transformation Project. Expenses related to our Business Transformation Project, inclusive of pay-related and software amortization expense, were $277 million in fiscal 2014 and $330.5 million in fiscal 2013 , representing a decrease of $53.5 million . The decrease in fiscal 2014 resulted from a reduction in certain employee costs that were attributed to our Business Transformation Project in fiscal 2013 that were no longer attributed to the Business Transformation Project in fiscal 2014 due to a change in allocation methodology. In fiscal 2013 , we allocated internal associates based upon estimates of the percentage of time they spent on the project. In fiscal 2014 , only associates that were dedicated full time to the project are included in Business Transformation Project costs. Additional contributors to the decreases include an increased level of capitalization on amounts spent for system improvements to enhance stability and scalability and reduced level of spend with consultants as compared to the comparable period in fiscal 2013 . The decrease in fiscal 2014 was partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense related to the Business Transformation Project of $10.7 million in fiscal 2014 over fiscal 2013 .

Our cost per case decreased $0.10 per case in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 . Our adjusted cost per case calculated on a non-GAAP basis decreased $0.06 in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 , primarily from reduced pay-related expenses from our sales and information technology areas and lower retirement-related expenses, partially offset by increased costs from delivery pay-related expenses. More information on the rationale for the use of adjusted operating expenses and adjusted cost per case and reconciliations can be found under “Non-GAAP Reconciliations.”
 
Certain Items Within Operating Expenses
 
Our significant Certain Items applicable for fiscal 2014 included costs in connection with the then proposed merger with US Foods, a change in the estimate of our self-insurance reserve and a liability for a settlement, which were described in greater detail above. Our significant Certain Items applicable for fiscal 2013 related to withdrawal liabilities from multiemployer pension plans, severance charges and costs from restructuring executive retirement plans.

From time to time, we may voluntarily withdraw from multiemployer pension plans to minimize or limit our future exposure to these plans. In fiscal 2013 , we recorded a provision $41.9 million , related to multiemployer pension plan withdrawals.
 
Net Earnings
 
Net earnings decrease d 26.3% in fiscal 2015 from fiscal 2014 due primarily to the changes in operating income discussed above, including the impact of Certain Items, which included increased interest expense of $131.6 million in fiscal 2015 that related to the financing of our proposed merger with US Foods.  These amounts include the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs when our bridge acquisition facility was terminated upon the issuance of our senior notes in October 2014 and interest expense on those senior notes. Excluding this interest expense, adjusted interest expense decreased by $0.6 million . Adjusted net earnings increased $66.3 million , or 6.4% , during fiscal 2015
 

26



Net earnings for fiscal 2014 decrease d 6.1% compared to fiscal 2013 .  This decrease was primarily due to changes in operating income discussed above.  Adjusted net earnings decreased 1.8% during fiscal 2014 .
 
The effective tax rate of 31.9% for fiscal 2015 was favorably impacted by lower earnings in the U.S. primarily due to costs associated with the termination of the US Foods proposed merger. The lower U.S. earnings resulted in a more significant favorable impact on the effective tax rate from the indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings due to lower foreign statutory tax rates as compared to the domestic tax rate. The additional cost associated with the proposed US Foods merger resulted in lower state taxes. For future periods, we would expect our normalized tax rate to be in the range of 36% to 37% .
 
The effective tax rate of 36.9% for fiscal 2014 was negatively impacted primarily by two items. First, a non-deductible penalty, that the company incurred, had an unfavorable tax impact of $6.2 million . Second, we recorded net tax expense of $5.2 million for tax and interest related to various federal, foreign and state uncertain tax positions. This negative impact was partially offset by the recording of $5.7 million of tax benefit related to disqualifying dispositions of Sysco stock pursuant to share-based compensation arrangements. Indefinitely reinvested earnings taxed at foreign statutory rates less than our domestic tax rate also had the impact of reducing the effective tax rate.

The effective tax rate for fiscal 2013 was 35.9% .  Indefinitely reinvested earnings taxed at foreign statutory tax rates less than our domestic tax rate had the impact of reducing the effective tax rate.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per share in fiscal 2015 were $1.16 , a 27.0% decrease from the fiscal 2014 amount of $1.59 per share.  Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2015 were $1.15 , a 27.2% decrease from the fiscal 2014 amount of $1.58 per share.  This decrease was primarily the result of the factors discussed above and due to greater shares outstanding during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 . As discussed below in “liquidity and capital resources - financing activities,” we chose not to repurchase any shares in fiscal 2015 due to the proposed US Foods merger. Our shares outstanding have increased primarily as a result of stock option exercises and restricted stock unit grants to employees. This resulted in lowering our earnings per share amounts by $0.02 per share. Adjusted diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2015 were $1.84 , an increase of 5.1% from the comparable prior year period amount of $1.75 .
 
Basic earnings per share in fiscal 2014 were $1.59 , a 5.4% decrease from the fiscal 2013 amount of $1.68 per share.  Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2014 were $1.58 , a 5.4% decrease from the fiscal 2013 amount of $1.67 per share.  This decrease was primarily the result of the factors discussed above.  Adjusted diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2014 , based on the Certain Items definition for the fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 years, were $1.76 , a decrease of 1.1% from the comparable prior year period amount of $1.78 . All earnings per share metrics for fiscal 2014 were partially impacted by a greater number of shares outstanding.  Sysco experienced a greater number of stock option exercises in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 , which increased the number of shares outstanding.
 
Non-GAAP Reconciliations and Adjusted Cost per Case 
 
Sysco’s results of operations are impacted by multiemployer pension withdrawal charges, severance charges, integration planning, litigation costs and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed with US Foods, facility closure charges and US Foods related financing costs. Additional items in fiscal 2014 include a change in estimate of self-insurance, and charges from a contingency accrual. These fiscal 2015 and 2014 items are collectively referred to as (Certain Items).  Our US Foods financing costs include the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs when our bridge acquisition facility was terminated upon the issuance of our senior notes in October 2014 and interest expense on those senior notes.   In fiscal 2014 , costs from executive retirement plans restructuring were included within Certain Items; however, because these costs in fiscal 2015 are comparable to fiscal 2014 , these were not included in the Certain Items definition for the comparison of adjusted results for fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 . This continues to be presented as a Certain Item in the comparison of adjusted results for fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . Management believes that adjusting its operating expenses, operating income, interest expense, net earnings and diluted earnings per share to remove the impact of these charges provides an important perspective of underlying business trends and results and provides meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors that is indicative of the performance of the company’s underlying operations and facilitates comparison on a year-over-year basis. 
 
The company uses these non-GAAP measures when evaluating its financial results, as well as for internal planning and forecasting purposes.  These financial measures should not be used as a substitute for GAAP measures in assessing the company’s results of operations for periods presented.  An analysis of any non-GAAP financial measure should be used in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP.  As a result, in the table below, each period presented is adjusted to remove the costs described above.  In the table below, individual components of diluted earnings per share may not add to the total presented due

27



to rounding.  Adjusted diluted earnings per share is calculated using adjusted net earnings divided by diluted shares outstanding.    

Set forth below is a reconciliation of actual operating expenses, operating income, interest expense, net earnings and diluted earnings per share to adjusted results for these measures for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 :
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change in Dollars
 

% Change
(3)
 
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Operating expenses (GAAP)
$
7,322,154

 
$
6,593,913

 
$
728,241

 
11.0
 %
Impact of MEPP charge

 
(1,451
)
 
1,451

 
NM

Impact of severance charges
(5,598
)
 
(7,202
)
 
1,604

 
(22.3
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
(554,667
)
 
(90,571
)
 
(464,096
)
 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance

 
(23,841
)
 
23,841

 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual

 
(20,000
)
 
20,000

 
NM

Impact of facility closure charges
(2,203
)
 
(3,443
)
 
1,240

 
(36.0
)
Impact of Certain Items on operating expenses
(562,468
)
 
(146,508
)
 
(415,960
)
 
NM

Adjusted operating expenses (Non-GAAP)
$
6,759,686

 
$
6,447,405

 
$
312,281

 
4.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Income (GAAP)
$
1,229,362

 
$
1,587,122

 
$
(357,760
)
 
(22.5
)%
Impact of Certain Items on operating income
562,468

 
146,508

 
415,960

 
NM

Adjusted operating income (Non-GAAP)
$
1,791,830

 
$
1,733,630

 
$
58,200

 
3.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense (GAAP)
$
254,807

 
$
123,741

 
$
131,066

 
105.9
 %
Impact of US Foods financing costs
(138,422
)
 
(6,790
)
 
(131,632
)
 
NM

Adjusted interest expense (Non-GAAP)
$
116,385

 
$
116,951

 
$
(566
)
 
(0.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (GAAP) (1)
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
(244,760
)
 
(26.3
)%
Impact of MEPP charge

 
916

 
(916
)
 
NM

Impact of severance charge
3,302

 
4,546

 
(1,244
)
 
(27.4
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
327,149

 
57,176

 
269,973

 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance

 
15,050

 
(15,050
)
 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual

 
18,156

 
(18,156
)
 
NM

Impact of facility closure charges
1,299

 
2,173

 
(874
)
 
(40.2
)
Impact of US Foods Financing Costs
81,643

 
4,286

 
77,357

 
NM

Adjusted net earnings (Non-GAAP) (1)
$
1,100,166

 
$
1,033,836

 
$
66,330

 
6.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP) (1)
$
1.15

 
$
1.58

 
$
(0.43
)
 
(27.2
)%
Impact of severance charge
0.01

 
0.01

 

 

Impact of US Foods merger costs
0.55

 
0.10

 
0.45

 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance

 
0.03

 
(0.03
)
 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual

 
0.03

 
(0.03
)
 
NM

Impact of US Foods Financing Costs
0.14

 
0.01

 
0.13

 
NM

Adjusted diluted earnings per share (Non-GAAP) (1)(2)
$
1.84

 
$
1.75

 
$
0.09

 
5.1
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted shares outstanding
596,849,034

 
590,216,220

 
 
 
 

(1) The net earnings and diluted earnings per share impacts are shown net of tax.  The aggregate tax impact of adjustments for Certain Items was $287.5 million and $55.8 million for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 , respectively.  Amounts are calculated by

28



multiplying the pretax impact of each Certain Item by the statutory rates in effect for each jurisdiction. In FY14, the impact of the charge from a contingency accrual contained an estimated non-deductible portion.

(2) Individual components of diluted earnings per share may not add to the total presented due to rounding. Total diluted earnings per share is calculated using adjusted net earnings for Certain Items divided by diluted shares outstanding.

  (3) NM represents that the percentage change was not meaningful

Set forth below is a reconciliation of actual operating expenses, operating income, net earnings and diluted earnings per share to adjusted results for these measures for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change (3)
 
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Operating expenses (GAAP)
$
6,593,913

 
$
6,338,129

 
$
255,784

 
4.0
 %
Impact of restructuring executive retirement plans
(3,329
)
 
(20,990
)
 
17,661

 
(84.1
)
Impact of MEPP charges
(1,451
)
 
(41,876
)
 
40,425

 
(96.5
)
Impact of severance charges
(7,202
)
 
(23,206
)
 
16,004

 
(69.0
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
(90,571
)
 

 
(90,571
)
 
NM

Impact of FY13 acquisition-related charge

 
(5,998
)
 
5,998

 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance
(23,841
)
 

 
(23,841
)
 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual
(20,000
)
 
$

 
(20,000
)
 
NM

Impact of facility closure charges
(3,443
)
 
(2,645
)
 
(798
)
 
30.2

Adjusted operating expenses (Non-GAAP)
$
6,444,076

 
$
6,243,414

 
$
200,662

 
3.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Income (GAAP)
$
1,587,122

 
$
1,658,478

 
$
(71,356
)
 
(4.3
)%
Impact of restructuring executive retirement plans
3,329

 
20,990

 
(17,661
)
 
(84.1
)
Impact of MEPP charges
1,451

 
41,876

 
(40,425
)
 
(96.5
)
Impact of severance charges
7,202

 
23,206

 
(16,004
)
 
(69.0
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
90,571

 

 
90,571

 
NM

Impact of FY13 acquisition-related charge

 
$
5,998

 
(5,998
)
 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance
23,841

 

 
23,841

 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual
20,000

 
$

 
20,000

 
NM

Impact of facility closure charges
3,443

 
2,645

 
798

 
30.2

Adjusted operating income (Non-GAAP)
$
1,736,959

 
$
1,753,193

 
$
(16,234
)
 
(0.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Expense (GAAP)
$
123,741

 
$
128,495

 
$
(4,754
)
 
(3.7
)%
Impact of US Foods financing costs
(6,790
)
 

 
(6,790
)
 
NM

Adjusted interest expense (Non-GAAP)
$
116,951

 
$
128,495

 
$
(11,544
)
 
(9.0
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (GAAP) (1)
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

 
$
(60.894
)
 
(6.1
)%
Impact of restructuring executive retirement plans
2,102

 
13,461

 
(11.359
)
 
(84.4
)
Impact of MEPP charges
916

 
26,855

 
(25.939
)
 
(96.6
)
Impact of severance charges
4,546

 
14,882

 
(10.336
)
 
(69.5
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
57,176

 

 
57.176

 
NM

Impact of FY13 acquisition-related charge

 
5,998

 
(5.998
)
 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance
15,050

 

 
15.05

 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual
18,156

 

 
18.156

 
NM

Impact of facility closure charges
2,173

 
$
1,696

 
0.477

 
28.1

Impact of US Foods financing costs
4,286

 

 
4.286

 
NM


29



 
2014
 
2013
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change (3)
 
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Adjusted net earnings (Non-GAAP) (1)
$
1,035,938

 
$
1,055,319

 
$
(19.381
)
 
(1.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP) (1)
$
1.58

 
$
1.67

 
$
(0.09
)
 
(5.4
)%
Impact of restructuring executive retirement plans

 
0.02

 
(0.02
)
 
NM

Impact of MEPP charges

 
0.05

 
(0.05
)
 
NM

Impact of severance charges
0.01

 
0.03

 
(0.02
)
 
(66.7
)
Impact of US Foods merger costs
0.10

 

 
0.10

 
NM

Impact of FY13 acquisition-related charge

 
0.01

 
(0.01
)
 
NM

Impact of change in estimate of self insurance
0.03

 

 
0.03

 
NM

Impact of contingency accrual
0.03

 

 
0.03

 
NM

Impact of US Foods financing costs
0.01

 

 
0.01

 
NM

Adjusted diluted earnings per share (Non-GAAP) (1)(2)
$
1.76

 
$
1.78

 
$
(0.02
)
 
(1.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted shares outstanding
590,216,220

 
592,675,110

 
 
 
 
(1) The net earnings and diluted earnings per share impacts are shown net of tax, except as noted below.  The aggregate tax impact of adjustments for Certain Items was $67.2 million and $37.8 million for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 , respectively.  The fiscal 2014 acquisition-related charge had no tax impact. Amounts are calculated by multiplying the operating income impact of each item by the respective year's effective tax rate with the exception of the impact of the charges from an estimate of a contingency accrual, which had an estimated non-deductible portion.

(2) Individual components of diluted earnings per share may not add to the total presented due to rounding. Total diluted earnings per share is calculated using adjusted net earnings for Certain Items divided by diluted shares outstanding.

  (3) NM represents that the percentage change was not meaningful
    
Cost per case is an important metric management uses to measure our expense performance.  This metric is calculated by taking the total operating expense of our North American Broadline companies, divided by the number of cases sold.  Adjusted cost per case is calculated similarly, however the operating expense component excludes charges from, multiemployer pension plans and severance, which are the Certain Items applicable to these companies, divided by the number of cases sold.  Our corporate expenses are not included in the cost per cases metrics because the metric is a measure of efficiency in our operations.  We seek to grow our sales and either minimize or reduce our costs on a per case basis.  Our North American Broadline companies represent approximately 80% of our total sales and 75% of our total operating expenses prior to corporate expenses.  Sysco considers adjusted cost per case to be a measure that provides useful information to management and investors about Sysco's expense management.  An analysis of any non-GAAP financial measure should be used in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP.  

In the table that follows, the change in adjusted cost per case is reconciled to cost per case for the periods presented.
 
 
Fiscal 2015
change from
Fiscal 2014
 
Fiscal 2014
change from
Fiscal 2013
Increase (decrease) in cost per case
$
0.04


$
(0.10
)
Impact of Certain Items (1)


0.04

Increase (decrease) in adjusted cost per case (Non-GAAP basis)
$
0.04


$
(0.06
)
(1) For all periods, the impact of Certain Items excludes charges from multiemployer pension plans and severance.  For the fiscal 2015 comparison to fiscal 2014 , our Certain Items charges were not significant enough to contribute a different adjusted cost per case result from the reported increase in cost per case. For the fiscal 2014 comparison to fiscal 2013 , the majority of the impact relates to multiemployer pension plans in the amount of $0.04 per case attributable to charges taken in fiscal 2014 that did not recur at the same magnitude in fiscal 2013 , and the remainder relates to severance charges.
 

30



Segment Results
 
We have aggregated our operating companies into two reporting segments, Broadline and SYGMA, as defined in the accounting literature related to disclosures about segments of an enterprise.  The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those disclosed by Sysco within the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data within Part II Item 8 of this Form 10-K.  Intersegment sales represent specialty produce and imported specialty products distributed by the Broadline and SYGMA operating companies. 
 
Management evaluates the performance of each of our operating segments based on its respective operating income results.   Corporate expenses and adjustments generally include all expenses of the corporate office and Sysco’s shared service center.  These also include all share-based compensation costs and integration planning, litigation costs and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed US Foods.  While a segment’s operating income may be impacted in the short-term by increases or decreases in gross profits, expenses, or a combination thereof, over the long-term each business segment is expected to increase its operating income at a greater rate than sales growth.  This is consistent with our long-term goal of leveraging earnings growth at a greater rate than sales growth. 
 
The following table sets forth the operating income of each of our reportable segments and the other segment expressed as a percentage of each segment’s sales for each period reported and should be read in conjunction with Note 21, “Business Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8:
 
Operating Income as a
 
Percentage of Sales
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Broadline
6.6
%
 
6.6
%
 
6.7
%
SYGMA
0.3

 
0.6

 
0.9

Other
2.6

 
3.0

 
3.2


The following table sets forth the change in the selected financial data of each of our reportable segments and the other segment expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the prior year and should be read in conjunction with Note 21, “Business Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8:
 
2015
 
 
2014
 
 
Sales
 
Operating Income
 
 
Sales
 
Operating Income
 
Broadline
5.0
 %
 
5.8
 %
 
 
4.3
%
 
2.8
 %
 
SYGMA
(1.6
)
 
(46.1
)
(1)  
 
6.9

 
(26.9
)
(1)  
Other
12.6

 
(4.6
)
 
 
6.6

 
2.2

 
 
(1)  SYGMA had operating income of $20.5 million in fiscal 2015 , $38.0 million in fiscal 2014 and $52.0 million in fiscal 2013 .
 

31



The following table sets forth sales and operating income of each of our reportable segments, the other segment, and intersegment sales, expressed as a percentage of aggregate segment sales, including intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively.  For purposes of this statistical table, operating income of our segments excludes corporate expenses and adjustments of $1.5 billion in fiscal 2015 , $1.0 billion in fiscal 2014 and $894.3 million in fiscal 2013 that are not charged to our segments.  This information should be read in conjunction with Note 21, “Business Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
Segment
 
 
 
Segment
 
 
 
Segment
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
Operating
 
Sales
 
Income
 
Sales
 
Income
 
Sales
 
Income
Broadline
79.4
 %
 
94.3
%
 
79.1
 %
 
93.1
%
 
79.4
 %
 
92.5
%
SYGMA
12.5

 
0.7

 
13.3

 
1.5

 
13.0

 
2.0

Other
10.8

 
5.0

 
10.1

 
5.4

 
9.9

 
5.5

Intersegment sales
(2.7
)
 

 
(2.5
)
 

 
(2.3
)
 

Total
100.0
 %
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
%
 
Broadline Segment
 
The Broadline reportable segment is an aggregation of the company’s U.S.and International Broadline segments located in Bahamas, Canada, Costa Rica and Ireland. Broadline operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to both traditional and chain restaurant customers, hospitals, schools, hotels, industrial caterers and other venues where foodservice products are served.  Broadline operations have significantly higher operating margins than the rest of Sysco’s operations.  In fiscal 2015 , the Broadline operating results represented approximately 79.4% of Sysco’s overall sales and 94.3% of the aggregate operating income of Sysco’s segments, which excludes corporate expenses.
 
There are several factors that contribute to these higher operating results as compared to the SYGMA and Other operating segments.  We have invested substantial amounts in assets, operating methods, technology and management expertise in this segment.  The breadth of its sales force, geographic reach of its distribution area and its purchasing power allow us to benefit from this segment’s earnings.
 
Sales
 
Sales for fiscal 2015 were 5.0% higher than fiscal 2014 .  Sales for fiscal 2015 increased as a result of product cost inflation and the resulting increase in selling prices, case volume growth, and sales from acquisitions that occurred within the last 12 months.  Our case volume growth in fiscal 2015 with our locally-managed customers was strong and corporate-managed customer volumes increased as well. Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably impacted sales by 0.5% in fiscal 2015 .  Changes in product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as inflation of 3.8% during fiscal 2015 , driven mainly by inflation in the meat, seafood and dairy categories.  The exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars negatively impacted sales by 1.3% in fiscal 2015
 
Sales for fiscal 2014 were 4.3% higher than fiscal 2013 . Sales for fiscal 2014 increased as a result of sales from acquisitions that occurred within the last 12 months, case volume growth and product cost inflation and the resulting increase in selling prices. Our sales growth in fiscal 2014 was greater with our corporate-managed customers as compared to sales growth with our locally-managed customers. The disparity in the growth rate between these customer types moderated in the last half of fiscal 2014 with locally-managed sales growth trending at similar rates as corporate-managed customers. Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably impacted sales by 1.7% in fiscal 2014 . Changes in product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as inflation of 2.0% during fiscal 2014 , driven mainly by inflation in the meat, seafood and dairy categories. The exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars negatively impacted sales by 0.8% in fiscal 2014

Operating Income
 
Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014
 
Operating income increase d by 5.8% in fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014 .  We experienced growth in our gross profits due to increased sales volumes, stronger relative mix of sales for our locally-managed customers and benefits from our category

32



management initiative.  Operating expenses increased from greater case volumes, higher incentive accruals, higher pay for our sales organization as a result of higher gross profit, investment in administrative support capabilities and acquired operations.  
 
Gross profits increased in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 and gross margins were steady. Increased competition resulting from a slow-growth market and volatile inflation has pressured our gross margins; however, sales and mix, as well as our category management initiative, have helped us stabilize our gross margin performance.   Our inflation rates were higher in the first half of fiscal 2015 , reaching levels of 6% at the mid-point of the fiscal year and dropping to minimal amounts by the end of the fiscal year. Fiscal 2015 inflation was seen primarily in the meat, dairy and poultry categories.     
   
Operating expenses for the Broadline segment increase d in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 .  The increase in expenses for fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was driven largely by higher sales costs, increased expense related to management incentive accruals and costs from companies acquired within the last 12 months. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in fuel costs. Sales and gross profit growth partially contributed to an increase in sales pay-related expenses due to increases in sales commissions and bonuses. In addition, we have increased our marketing associate headcount in certain markets in order to invest in future sales growth. Our cost per case and adjusted cost per case increase d $0.04 per case in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 .  The impact of foreign exchange rates lowered our cost per case results by $0.05 per case for fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 , which partially offset the rate of increase occurring primarily from increased pay-related expenses partially offset by lower fuel costs.       
 
Fiscal 2014 vs. Fiscal 2013
 
Operating income increase d by 2.8% in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 .  This increase was driven by operating expenses increasing more than gross profit dollars. 
 
Gross profit dollars increase d in fiscal 2014 primarily due to increased sales; however, gross profit dollars increase d at a lower rate than sales.  This decline in gross margin was partially the result of increased inflation, increased growth from corporate-managed customers and, in part, from our Business Transformation Project Initiative.  Increased competition resulting from a slow-growth market also contributed to the decline in gross margins.  Our Broadline segment experienced product cost inflation in fiscal 2014 .  Based on our product sales mix during fiscal 2014 , we were most impacted by higher levels of inflation in the poultry and meat product categories. 
   
Operating expenses for the Broadline segment increase d in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 .  The expense increase s in fiscal 2014 were driven largely by charges related to multiemployer pension plan withdrawals, pay-related expenses including severance costs, depreciation and amortization expense and fuel.  The increase in pay-related expenses was primarily due to increased delivery and warehouse compensation, partially attributable to case growth, and added costs from companies acquired in the last 12 months.  Delivery and warehouse compensation includes activity-based pay that will increase when our case volumes increase.  Additionally, pay rates have been higher particularly in geographies where oil and gas exploration occurs.  These increases were partially offset by reduced sales and information technology pay-related expenses.  Our enhanced defined contribution plan became effective January 1, 2013 and contributed to the increase in operating expenses.  Depreciation and amortization increased primarily from assets that were not placed in service in fiscal 2013 that were in service in fiscal 2014 , primarily from new facilities, property from new acquisitions and expansions.  
 
In fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 , we recorded provisions of $1.5 million and $41.9 million , respectively, related to multiemployer pension plan withdrawals. 
 
Our fiscal 2014 cost per case, excluding charges related to withdrawals from multiemployer pension plans, decrease d as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily from reduced pay-related expenses from our sales and information technology areas, partially offset by increased costs from delivery and warehouse pay-related expenses, increased retirement-related expenses and fuel increases.
 
SYGMA Segment
 
SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products, a wide variety of non-food products and customer-specific proprietary products to certain chain restaurant customer locations.  SYGMA operations have traditionally had lower operating income as a percentage of sales than Sysco’s other segments.  This segment of the foodservice industry has generally been characterized by lower overall operating margins as the volume that these customers command allows them to negotiate for reduced margins.  These operations service chain restaurants through contractual agreements that are typically structured on a fee per case delivered basis. 
 

33



Sales
 
Sales were 1.6% lower in fiscal 2015 than in fiscal 2014 .  The decrease was primarily due to the resignation of several unprofitable accounts, lost customers and lower fuel surcharges.  Partially offsetting these decreases were increases from product cost inflation (and the resulting increase in selling prices) and case volume increases from existing customers.  We expect similar sales results in fiscal 2016 due to the continued impact of these resignations, as well as competitive pricing pressures. SYGMA intends to add business with new and existing customers to profitably grow this segment's results.
 
Sales were 6.9% greater in fiscal 2014 than in fiscal 2013 .  The increase was primarily due to new customers. Other contributors to the increase were product cost inflation and the resulting increase in selling prices and case volume increases from existing customers.
 
Operating Income
 
Operating income decrease d by 46.1% in fiscal 2015 from fiscal 2014 .  Gross profit dollars decrease d 3.3% while operating expenses increase d 7.3% in fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014 .  Gross profit dollar growth was lower primarily due to reduced fuel surcharges and lower margins as a result of the competitive market environment.  Operating expenses increase d in fiscal 2015 largely due to increased warehouse and delivery costs, including pay-related expenses, partially resulting from efforts to increase driver retention and manage warehouse employee shortages.  Operating income is expected to improve in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 due to improved profitability from resigning less profitable customers and improved productivity.
 
Operating income decrease d by 26.9% in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 .  Gross profit dollars increase d 2.8% while operating expenses increase d 6.5% in fiscal 2014 over fiscal 2013 .  These gross profit results largely reflect the sluggish sales environment that existed at that time.  Operating expenses increased in fiscal 2014 largely due to increased delivery costs including pay-related expenses.  Our enhanced defined contribution plan became effective January 1, 2013 and contributed to the increase in pay-related expense.
 
Other Segment
 
“Other” financial information is attributable to our other operating segments, including our specialty produce, our custom-cut meat operations, lodging industry products segments, a company that distributes specialty imported products, a company that distributes to international customers and our Sysco Ventures platform, our suite of technology solutions that help support the business needs of our customers.  These operating segments are discussed on an aggregate basis as they do not represent reportable segments under segment accounting literature.
 
On an aggregate basis, our “Other” segment has had a lower operating income as a percentage of sales than Sysco’s Broadline segment.  Sysco has acquired some of the operating companies within this segment in recent years.  These operations generally operate in a niche within the foodservice industry except for our lodging industry supply company.  Each individual operation is also generally smaller in sales and scope than an average Broadline operation and each of these operating segments is considerably smaller in sales and overall scope than the Broadline segment.  In fiscal 2015 , in the aggregate, the “Other” segment represented approximately 10.8% of Sysco’s overall sales and 5.0% of the aggregate operating income of Sysco’s segments, which excludes corporate expenses and adjustments. 
 
Operating income decrease d 4.6% , or $6.5 million , in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 .  The decrease in operating income was largely due to startup costs from our Iowa Premium Beef operations, partially offset by increased earnings from our specialty produce and custom-cut meat segments.   
 
Operating income decrease d 2.2% for fiscal 2014 over fiscal 2013 .  The decrease in operating income was largely due to startup costs from our Sysco Ventures operations, partially offset by increased earnings from our specialty produce and lodging industry products segments.  Additionally, retirement-related expenses were greater for these companies for fiscal 2014 as our enhanced defined contribution plan became effective January 1, 2013, and some of these operations were not a part of prior benefit plans.
 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 

34



Highlights
 
Comparisons of the cash flows from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 :
 
Cash flows from operations were $1.6 billion this year compared to $1.5 billion last year.
Net capital expenditures totaled $518.4 million this year compared to $497.4 million last year.
Free cash flow was $1.0 billion this year compared to $995.4 million last year (see Non-GAAP reconciliation below under the heading “Free Cash Flow”)
Cash used for acquisition of businesses was $115.9 million this year compared to $79.3 million last year.
Net bank borrowings were a net repayment of $130.0 million this year compared to a net borrowing of $34.5 million last year. 
Proceeds from exercises of share-based compensation awards were $240.2 million this year compared to $255.6 million last year.
Treasury stock purchases were zero this year compared to $332.4 million last year.
Dividends paid were $695.3 million this year compared to $667.2 million last year.
 
Sources and Uses of Cash
 
Sysco’s strategic objectives include continuous investment in our business; these investments are funded by a combination of cash from operations and access to capital from financial markets.  Our operations historically have produced significant cash flow.  Cash generated from operations is generally allocated to:
 
working capital requirements;
investments in facilities, systems, fleet, other equipment and technology;
return of capital to shareholders, including cash dividends and share repurchases;
acquisitions compatible with our overall growth strategy;
contributions to our various retirement plans; and
debt repayments.
 
Any remaining cash generated from operations may be invested in high-quality, short-term instruments.  As a part of our ongoing strategic analysis, we regularly evaluate business opportunities, including potential acquisitions and sales of assets and businesses, and our overall capital structure.  Any transactions resulting from these evaluations may materially impact our liquidity, borrowing capacity, leverage ratios and capital availability.
 
We continue to generate substantial cash flows from operations and remain in a strong financial position; however, our liquidity and capital resources can be influenced by economic trends and conditions that impact our results of operations.   We believe our mechanisms to manage working capital, such as credit monitoring, optimizing inventory levels and maximizing payment terms with vendors, and our mechanisms to manage the items impacting our gross profits have been sufficient to limit a significant unfavorable impact on our cash flows from operations.  We believe these mechanisms will continue to prevent a significant unfavorable impact on our cash flows from operations.  As of June 27, 2015 , we had $5.1 billion in cash and cash equivalents, approximately 4% of which was held by our international subsidiaries generated from our earnings of international operations.  This percentage is lower than previous years because of proceeds from our senior notes offering, which we borrowed to fund the then proposed US Foods merger. Since the senior notes were redeemed subsequent to June 27, 2015 , due to the termination of the merger agreement, we would expect this percentage to return to historical levels, such as 32% , which was the percentage as of June 28, 2014 . If these earnings were transferred among countries or repatriated to the U.S., such amounts may be subject to additional tax obligations; however, we do not currently anticipate the need to repatriate this cash.
 
We believe the following sources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months, while maintaining sufficient liquidity for normal operating purposes:
our cash flows from operations;
the availability of additional capital under our existing commercial paper programs, supported by our revolving credit facility and bank line of credit; and
our ability to access capital from financial markets, including issuances of debt securities, either privately or under a shelf registration statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 .
 
Due to our strong financial position, we believe that we will continue to be able to effectively access the commercial paper market and long-term capital markets, if necessary.  

35




Cash Flows
 
Operating Activities
 
Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014
 
We generated $1.6 billion in cash flow from operations in fiscal 2015 , as compared to $1.5 billion in fiscal 2014 .  This increase of $62.7 million , or 4.2% , was largely attributable to favorable comparisons on accrued expenses, partially offset by unfavorable comparisons on the cash impact of our Certain Items that increased $148.9 million year-over-year. Other unfavorable comparisons were a decrease in other long-term liabilities and the impact of timing for pension contributions, as well as increased working capital needs.
 
Included in the change in accrued expenses was a favorable comparison of incentive accruals due to better performance against incentive targets in fiscal 2015 .  Our Certain Items increased primarily from integration planning, litigation and termination costs in connection with the merger that had been proposed with US Foods. Our merger termination fees of $312.5 million , payable to US Foods and PFG, were accrued as of June 27, 2015 , and were paid in the July 2015.

Included in the change in other long-term liabilities was a negative comparison on pension expense and contributions, which contributed $90.4 million to the unfavorable comparison on cash flow from operations for fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 .  Pension income was $15.3 million and pension contributions were $75.1 million , including a $50 million contribution to our Retirement Plan in fiscal 2015 , which resulted in a decrease to other long-term liabilities.  Pension expense was $4.8 million and pension contributions were $24.8 million in fiscal 2014 , which resulted in a decrease to other long-term liabilities.   
  
Changes in working capital, specifically accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable, had a net unfavorable comparison of $25.0 million on the comparison of cash flow from operations for fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014 .  There was a favorable comparison on inventory and accounts receivable, which was partially offset by unfavorable comparisons on accounts payable.  Accounts receivable increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales; however, the level of increase in fiscal 2015 was less than fiscal 2014 due to improved collection efforts.  Inventory increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales.  However, inventory turnover improved in fiscal 2015 , as compared to fiscal 2014 .  Accounts payable increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales.  The year-over-year impact of the change in accounts payable is unfavorable to cash flow from operations due to working capital improvements that were at a greater magnitude in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2015 .  
Fiscal 2014 vs. Fiscal 2013
 
We generated $1.49 billion in cash flow from operations in fiscal 2014 , as compared to $1.51 billion in fiscal 2013 .  The decrease of $18.8 million or 1.2% , was largely attributable to a negative comparison on pension expense and contributions, reduced net earnings, a negative comparison on multiemployer pension withdrawal provisions and payments and an unfavorable comparison on prepaid expenses. Partially offsetting these unfavorable comparisons was a favorable comparison on working capital, several significant accruals in fiscal 2014 and an increase in non-cash depreciation and amortization.

Included in the change in other long-term liabilities was a negative comparison on pension expense and contributions, which contributed $65 million to the unfavorable comparison on cash flow from operations for fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . Pension expense was $4.8 million and pension contributions were $24.8 million in fiscal 2014 , which resulted in a decrease to other long-term liabilities. Pension expense was $138.3 million and pension contributions were $93.6 million in fiscal 2013 , which resulted in an increase to other long-term liabilities.

Included in the change in accrued expenses was a negative comparison of $49.4 million on multiemployer withdrawal provisions and payments. Fiscal 2014 included a provision for multiemployer pension withdrawal of $1.5 million and payments of $40.8 million , which resulted in a decrease to accrued expenses. Fiscal 2013 included a provision for multiemployer pension withdrawal of $41.9 million and payments of $31.8 million , which resulted in an increase to accrued expenses. Partially offsetting the unfavorable impact of the multiemployer accrual comparison were several significant accruals unique to fiscal 2014 , which contributed $48.5 million to cash flow from operations for fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 .

Changes in working capital, specifically accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable, had a favorable comparison of $129.7 million on the comparison of cash flow from operations for fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . There was a favorable comparison on accounts payable, which was partially offset by unfavorable comparisons on accounts receivable and inventory. Accounts receivable increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales. Our sales growth in fiscal 2014 was greater with our corporate-managed customers and payment terms for these types of customers are traditionally longer than average. This mix of longer-term

36



receivables contributed to the unfavorable comparison on cash flow from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . Inventory increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales. However, inventory turnover improved in fiscal 2014 , as compared to a deterioration of inventory turnover in fiscal 2013 , due to working capital improvements in inventory. Fiscal 2014 also included an increase in inventory in transit, which offset the favorable comparison due to working capital improvements, resulting in an overall unfavorable comparison on cash flow from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2013 . Accounts payable increased in both periods as a result of increases in sales. The year-over-year impact of the change in accounts payable is favorable to cash flow from operations due to working capital improvements in accounts payable as well as an increase in fiscal 2014 in accounts payable related to inventory in transit.

Investing Activities
 
Fiscal 2015 capital expenditures included:

fleet replacements;
investments in technology.
replacement or significant expansion of facilities in Arizona, California, Iowa and Virginia; and
construction of fold-out facilities in Ireland.
 
Fiscal 2014 capital expenditures included:
fleet replacements;
construction of fold-out facilities in Ontario, Canada and Ireland;
replacement or significant expansion of facilities in Arizona, California, Pennsylvania and Virginia; and
investments in technology.

Fiscal 2013 capital expenditures included:
fleet replacements;
construction of a fold-out facility in  southern California; 
replacement or significant expansion of facilities in Georgia; British Columbia, Canada; Massachusetts and South Carolina; and
investments in technology.

The level of capital expenditures in fiscal 2015 was mostly consistent with fiscal 2014 , representing a small increase of $19.6 million .  Capital expenditures in fiscal 2014 increased by $11.3 million from fiscal 2013 .  Capital expenditures in fiscal 2014 and 2013 for our Business Transformation Project were $33.4 million and $20.0 million , respectively. 
 
We estimate our capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sales of assets, in fiscal 2016 should be in the range of $550 million to $600 million .  Fiscal 2016 expenditures will include facility, fleet and other equipment replacements and expansions; new facility construction, including fold-out facilities; and investments in technology.
 
During fiscal 2015 , in the aggregate, the company paid cash of $115.9 million for operations acquired during fiscal 2015 and for contingent consideration related to operations acquired in previous fiscal years.  During fiscal 2015 , we acquired for cash a broadline company in Ontario, Canada; a joint venture interest in a foodservice distribution company in Mexico; a joint venture interest in a foodservice distribution company in Costa Rica and a specialty seafood company in New Jersey. 
 
During fiscal 2014 , in the aggregate, the company paid cash of $79.3 million for operations acquired during fiscal 2014 and for contingent consideration related to operations acquired in previous fiscal years.  During fiscal 2014, we acquired for cash a specialty meat company in Maryland and broadline operations in Missouri, Ohio and Philadelphia.

During fiscal 2013 , in the aggregate, the company paid cash of $397.4 million for operations acquired during fiscal 2013 and for contingent consideration related to operations acquired in previous fiscal years.  During fiscal 2013 , we acquired for cash broadline operations in Bahamas, California, Ohio, Quebec, Canada, Northern Ireland; specialty seafood companies in Ontario, Canada, Florida and Houston; specialty produce in Ireland and our Sysco Ventures startup in California.
 
Free Cash Flow
 
Free cash flow represents net cash provided from operating activities less purchases of plant and equipment plus proceeds from sales of plant and equipment.  Sysco considers free cash flow to be a non-GAAP liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business after the purchases and sales of buildings, fleet, equipment and technology, which may potentially be used to pay for, among other things, strategic uses of cash

37



including dividend payments, share repurchases and acquisitions. However, free cash flow may not be available for discretionary expenditures, as it may be necessary that we use it to make mandatory debt service or other payments.  As a result of increased cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by increased capital spending and decreased proceeds from sales of plant and equipment, free cash flow for fiscal 2015 increased 4.2% , or $41.7 million , to $1.0 billion as compared to fiscal 2014 .    Increased cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by increased capital spending, resulted in free cash flow for fiscal 2014 decreasing 2.0% , or $19.9 million , to $995.4 million as compared to fiscal 2013

Free cash flow should not be used as a substitute in assessing the company’s liquidity for the periods presented.  An analysis of any non-GAAP financial measure should be used in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP.  In the table that follows, free cash flow for each period presented is reconciled to net cash provided by operating activities. 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP)
$
1,555,484

 
$
1,492,815

 
$
62,669

 
4.2

Additions to plant and equipment
(542,830
)
 
(523,206
)
 
(19,624
)
 
3.8

Proceeds from sales of plant and equipment
24,472

 
25,790

 
(1,318
)
 
(5.1
)
Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)
$
1,037,126

 
$
995,399

 
$
41,727

 
4.2


 
2014
 
2013
 
Change in Dollars
 
% Change
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP)
$
1,492,815

 
$
1,511,594

 
$
(18,779
)
 
(1.2
)
Additions to plant and equipment
(523,206
)
 
(511,862
)
 
(11,344
)
 
2.2

Proceeds from sales of plant and equipment
25,790

 
15,527

 
10,263

 
66.1

Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)
$
995,399

 
$
1,015,259

 
$
(19,860
)
 
(2.0
)
 
Financing Activities
 
Equity Transactions
 
Proceeds from exercises of share-based compensation awards were $240.2 million in fiscal 2015 , $255.6 million in fiscal 2014 and $628.7 million in fiscal 2013 .  The level of proceeds in each year is directly related to the number of options exercised in each year.  The level of option exercises, and thus proceeds, will vary from period to period and is largely dependent on movements in our stock price.
 
We traditionally have engaged in Board-approved share repurchase programs.  No shares were acquired in fiscal 2015 due to the proposed US Foods merger. The number of shares acquired and their cost during 2014 and 2013 were 10,059,000 shares for $332.4 million in fiscal 2014 and 21,672,403 shares for $721.6 million in fiscal 2013 .  No additional shares were repurchased through August 13, 2015, resulting in a remaining authorization by our Board of Directors to repurchase up to 11,655,197 shares from a repurchase program that expired on August 23, 2015 . In June 2015, our Board of Directors approved a repurchase program to repurchase from time to time in the open market, through an accelerated share repurchase program or through privately negotiated transactions, shares of the company's common stock in an amount not to exceed $3.0 billion during the two year period ending July 1, 2017 , including $1.5 billion through a planned accelerated share repurchase in fiscal 2016, in addition to amounts normally repurchased to offset benefit plan and stock option dilution. In addition to the share repurchase program approved in June, in August 2015 , our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $800 million .  The authorization expires on August 21, 2017 .  Beyond our $3.0 billion share repurchase program approved in June 2015, our share repurchase strategy is to purchase enough shares to keep our average shares outstanding relatively constant over time.  The number of shares we repurchase in fiscal 2016 will be dependent on many factors, including the level of future stock option exercises as well as competing uses for available cash.
 
We have made dividend payments to our shareholders in each fiscal year since our company’s inception over 40 years ago.  We target a dividend payout of 40% to 50% of net earnings.  We paid in excess of that range in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 primarily due to increased expenses from our Certain Items.  Dividends paid were $695.3 million , or $1.17 per share, in fiscal 2015 , $667.2 million , or $1.14 per share, in fiscal 2014 and $648.3 million , or $1.10 per share, in fiscal 2013 .  In May 2015 , we declared our regular quarterly dividend for the first quarter of fiscal 2016 of $0.30 per share, which was paid in July 2015 .
 

38



In November 2000, we filed with the SEC a shelf registration statement covering 30,000,000 shares of common stock to be offered from time to time in connection with acquisitions.  As of August 13, 2015 , 29,477,835 shares remained available for issuance under this registration statement.
 
Debt Activity and Borrowing Availability

Our debt activity, including issuances and repayments, and our borrowing availability is described in Note 11, “Debt and Other Financing Arrangements.” Our outstanding borrowings at June 27, 2015, and repayment activity since the close of fiscal 2015, are disclosed within that note. Updated amounts through August 13, 2015 , include:

$744.0 million outstanding from our commercial paper program
No amounts outstanding from the credit facility supporting the company’s U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs.

Our aggregate commercial paper issuances and short-term bank borrowings had a weighted average interest rate of 0.54% , for fiscal 2015 and 0.16% for each of fiscal 2014 and 2013 respectively.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we intend to file with the SEC an automatically effective well-known seasoned issuer shelf registration statement for the issuance of an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and guarantees of debt securities that may be issued from time to time.
 
Other Considerations
 
Multiemployer Plans
 
Our exposure to multiemployer defined benefit plans is discussed in Note 15, “Multiemployer Employee Benefit Plans,” including our estimate of our share of withdrawal liability for these plans. An update of this amount through August 13, 2015 , based on the latest available information, is unchanged from the amount disclosed in Note 15.
 
Potential Contingencies Impacting Liquidity
 
Certain tax jurisdictions require partial to full payment on audit assessments or the posting of letters of credit in order to proceed to the appeals process.  Sysco has posted approximately $90 million in letters of credit, representing a partial payment of the audit assessments, in order to appeal the Canadian Revenue Authority assessments of transfer pricing adjustments relating to our cross border procurement activities through our former purchasing cooperative on our fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2009 fiscal years.  We are protesting these adjustments through appeals. We could have to pay cash or post additional letters of credit of as much as $16.0 million , in order to appeal these assessments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
 

39



Contractual Obligations    
 
The following table sets forth, as of June 27, 2015 , certain information concerning our obligations and commitments to make contractual future payments:
 
Payments Due by Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
More Than
 
Total
 
< 1 Year
 
1-3 Years
 
3-5 Years
 
5 Years
 
(In thousands)
Recorded Contractual Obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal payments of long-term debt
7,271,831

 
5,002,972

 
526,291

 
266,972

 
1,475,596

Mandatory senior note redemption premium
50,000

 
50,000

 

 

 

Merger-termination payments
312,500

 
312,500

 

 

 

Other debt repayments
$
69,542

 
$
69,542

 

 

 

Capital leases obligations
32,939

 
4,971

 
9,543

 
5,946

 
12,479

Deferred compensation (1)
82,925

 
7,288

 
11,945

 
9,186

 
54,506

Pension Plan (2)
44,900

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44,900

SERP and other postretirement plans (3)
306,424

 
28,268

 
58,908

 
61,409

 
157,839

Unrecognized tax benefits and interest (4)
70,992

 
70,992

 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrecorded Contractual Obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest payments related to debt (5)
1,453,240

 
143,851

 
215,523

 
164,017

 
929,849

Operating lease obligations
196,223

 
47,559

 
66,013

 
36,981

 
45,670

Purchase obligations (6)
5,032,523

 
3,823,783

 
1,098,488

 
108,761

 
1,491

Total contractual cash obligations
$
14,924,039

 
$
9,561,726

 
$
1,986,711

 
$
653,272

 
$
2,722,330

 
(1) The estimate of the timing of future payments under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan involves the use of certain assumptions, including retirement ages and payout periods. 
(2) The estimated contributions through fiscal 2024 to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements based on actuarial assumptions include the extension of funding relief included in the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014.
(3) Includes estimated contributions to the unfunded SERP and other postretirement benefit plans made in amounts needed to fund benefit payments for vested participants in these plans through fiscal 2025, based on actuarial assumptions.
(4) Unrecognized tax benefits relate to uncertain tax positions recorded under accounting standards related to uncertain tax positions.  As of June 27, 2015 , we had a liability of $37.5 million for unrecognized tax benefits for all tax jurisdictions and $33.4 million for related interest that could result in cash payment.  We are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of non-current payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time.  Accordingly, the related non-current balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table. 
 
(5) Includes payments on floating rate debt based on rates as of June 27, 2015 , assuming amount remains unchanged until maturity, and payments on fixed rate debt based on maturity dates.  The impact of our outstanding fixed-to-floating interest rate swap on the fixed rate debt interest payments is included as well based on the floating rates in effect as of June 27, 2015 .
(6) For purposes of this table, purchase obligations include agreements for purchases of product in the normal course of business, for which all significant terms have been confirmed, including minimum quantities resulting from our category management initiative.  As we progress with this initiative, our purchase obligations are increasing.  Such amounts included in the table above are based on estimates.  Purchase obligations also includes amounts committed with various third party service providers to provide information technology services for period up to fiscal 2019 (See discussion under Note 20, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8) and fixed fuel purchase commitments.  Purchase obligations exclude full requirements electricity contracts where no stated minimum purchase volume is required.
 
Certain acquisitions involve contingent consideration, typically payable only in the event that certain operating results are attained or certain outstanding contingencies are resolved.  Aggregate contingent consideration amounts outstanding as of June 27, 2015  were  $39 million .  This amount is not included in the table above.
 

40



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses in the accompanying financial statements. Significant accounting policies employed by Sysco are presented in the notes to the financial statements.
 
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations. These policies require our most subjective or complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and estimates and this related disclosure. Our most critical accounting policies and estimates pertain to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, self-insurance programs, company-sponsored pension plans, income taxes, vendor consideration, goodwill and intangible assets and share-based compensation.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable and determine the appropriate reserve for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors. We utilize specific criteria to determine uncollectible receivables to be written off, including whether a customer has filed for or has been placed in bankruptcy, has had accounts referred to outside parties for collection or has had accounts past due over specified periods. In these instances, a specific allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded to reduce the receivable to the net amount reasonably expected to be collected. Allowances are recorded for all other receivables based on an analysis of historical trends of write-offs and recoveries.  Our judgment is required as to the impact of certain of these items and other factors as to ultimate realization of our accounts receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.
 
Self-Insurance Program
 
We maintain a self-insurance program covering portions of workers’ compensation, general liability and vehicle liability costs. The amounts in excess of the self-insured levels are fully insured by third party insurers. We also maintain a fully self-insured group medical program. Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, medical cost trends, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. Projections of future loss expenses are inherently uncertain because of the random nature of insurance claims occurrences and could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. In an attempt to mitigate the risks of workers’ compensation, vehicle and general liability claims, safety procedures and awareness programs have been implemented.
 
Company-Sponsored Pension Plans
 
Amounts related to defined benefit plans recognized in the financial statements are determined on an actuarial basis. Two of the more critical assumptions in the actuarial calculations are the discount rate for determining the current value of plan benefits and the expected rate of return on plan assets. Our Retirement Plan was frozen in fiscal 2013 and is only open to a small number of employees. Our SERP was frozen in fiscal 2013. Due to these plan freezes, our assumption for the rate of increase in future compensation is no longer a critical assumption. 
 
For guidance in determining the discount rates, we calculate the implied rate of return on a hypothetical portfolio of high-quality fixed-income investments for which the timing and amount of cash outflows approximates the estimated payouts of the pension plan. The discount rate assumption is reviewed annually and revised as deemed appropriate. The discount rate for determining fiscal 2015 net pension costs for the Retirement Plan, which was determined as of the June 28, 2014 measurement date, decreased 58 basis points to 4.74% .  The discount rate for determining fiscal 2015 net pension costs for the SERP, which was determined as of the June 28, 2014 measurement date, decreased 35 basis points to 4.59% .  The combined effect of these discount rate changes increased our net company-sponsored pension costs for all plans for fiscal 2015 by an estimated $7 million .  The discount rate for determining fiscal 2016 net pension costs for the Retirement Plan, which was determined as of the June 27, 2015 measurement date, increased 10 basis points to 4.84% .  The discount rate for determining fiscal 2016 net pension costs for the SERP, which was determined as of the June 27, 2015 measurement date, increased  4 basis points to 4.63% .  The combined effect of these discount rate changes will decrease our net company-sponsored pension costs for all plans for fiscal 2016 by an estimated $1 million .  A 100 basis point increase (or decrease) in the discount rates for fiscal 2015 would decrease (or increase) Sysco’s net company-sponsored pension cost by approximately $11 million .  Now that Sysco’s pension plans are frozen, net company-sponsored pension cost is not as sensitive to discount rate changes as compared to when these plans were active.  
 
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of the Retirement Plan was 7.75% for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 . The expectations of future returns are derived from a mathematical asset model that incorporates assumptions as to the various asset

41



class returns, reflecting a combination of historical performance analysis and the forward-looking views of the financial markets regarding the yield on bonds, historical returns of the major stock markets and returns on alternative investments. Although not determinative of future returns, the effective annual rate of return on plan assets, developed using geometric/compound averaging, was approximately 8.3% , 6.3% , 11.1% , and 7.7% , over the 20-year, 10-year, 5-year and 1-year periods ended December 31, 2014 , respectively. In addition, in seven of the last 15 years, the actual return on plan assets has exceeded 10% . The rate of return assumption is reviewed annually and revised as deemed appropriate.
 
The expected return on plan assets impacts the recorded amount of net pension costs.  The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of the Retirement Plan is 7.25% for fiscal 2016 . A 100 basis point increase (decrease) in the assumed rate of return for fiscal 2015 would decrease (increase) Sysco’s net company-sponsored pension costs for fiscal 2015 by approximately $30 million .
 
Pension accounting standards require the recognition of the funded status of our defined benefit plans in the statement of financial position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The amount reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the recognition of the funded status of our defined benefit plans as of June 27, 2015 was a charge, net of tax, of $705.3 million .  The amount reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the recognition of the funded status of our defined benefit plans as of June 28, 2014 was a charge, net of tax, of $686.0 million .
 
We made cash contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans of $75.1 million and $24.8 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively.  Our contributions in fiscal 2015 include a $50.0 million contribution to the Retirement Plan that was voluntary, as there was no minimum required contribution for the calendar 2014 plan year to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements.  There was no contribution to the Retirement Plan in fiscal 2014 , as there was no minimum required contribution for the calendar 2013 plan year to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements.  There are no required contributions to the Retirement Plan to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements in fiscal 2016 .  The estimated fiscal 2016 contributions to fund benefit payments for the SERP plan are approximately $28 million .
 
Income Taxes
 
The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Our provision for income taxes primarily reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in the various U.S. federal and state, as well as foreign jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or decreases in permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits or valuation allowances, and our change in the mix of earnings from these taxing jurisdictions all affect the overall effective tax rate.
 
Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions. We believe that the judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable; however, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. To the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or pay amounts in excess of recorded liabilities, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement generally would require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement may be recognized as a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.
 
Vendor Consideration
 
We recognize consideration received from vendors when the services performed in connection with the monies received are completed and when the related product has been sold by Sysco. There are several types of cash consideration received from vendors.  In many instances, the vendor consideration is in the form of a specified amount per case or per pound. In these instances, we will recognize the vendor consideration as a reduction of cost of sales when the product is sold.  In some instances, vendor consideration is received upon receipt of inventory in our distribution facilities. We calculate the amount needed to reduce our inventory based on inventory turns until the product is sold. Our inventory turnover is usually less than one month; therefore, amounts deferred against inventory do not require long-term estimation. In the situations where the vendor consideration is not related directly to specific product purchases, we will recognize these as a reduction of cost of sales when the earnings process is complete, the related service is performed and the amounts realized.  Historically, adjustments to our estimates related to vendor consideration have not been significant.   


42



Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill and intangible assets represent the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of tangible net assets acquired. Certain assumptions and estimates are employed in determining the fair value of assets acquired, including goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as determining the allocation of goodwill to the appropriate reporting unit.
 
In addition, annually in our fourth quarter or more frequently as needed, we assess the recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles by determining whether the fair values of the applicable reporting units exceed the carrying values of these assets. The reporting units used in assessing goodwill impairment are our 13 operating segments as described in Note 21, “Business Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.  The components within each of our 13 operating segments have similar economic characteristics and therefore are aggregated into 13 reporting units.  
 
We arrive at our estimates of fair value using a combination of discounted cash flow and earnings multiple models. The results from each of these models are then weighted and combined into a single estimate of fair value for each of our 13 operating segments. We primarily use a 60% weighting for our discounted cash flow valuation and 40% for the earnings multiple models giving greater emphasis to our discounted cash flow model because the forecasted operating results that serve as a basis for the analysis incorporate management’s outlook and anticipated changes for the businesses consistent with a market participant. The primary assumptions used in these various models include estimated earnings multiples of comparable acquisitions in the industry including control premiums, earnings multiples on acquisitions completed by Sysco in the past, future cash flow estimates of the reporting units, which are dependent on internal forecasts and projected growth rates, and weighted average cost of capital, along with working capital and capital expenditure requirements. When possible, we use observable market inputs in our models to arrive at the fair values of our reporting units. We update our projections used in our discounted cash flow model based on historical performance and changing business conditions for each of our reporting units. 
 
Our estimates of fair value contain uncertainties requiring management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. Actual results could differ from these assumptions and projections, resulting in the company revising its assumptions and, if required, recognizing an impairment loss. There were no impairments of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles recorded as a result of assessment in fiscal 2015 , 2014 or 2013 .  Our past estimates of fair value for fiscal 2014 and 2013 have not been materially different when revised to include subsequent years’ actual results.  Sysco has not made any material changes in its impairment assessment methodology during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe the estimates used in the analysis are reasonably likely to change materially in the future but we will continue to assess the estimates in the future based on the expectations of the reporting units. In the fiscal 2015 assessment, our estimates of fair value did not require additional analysis. However, we would have performed additional analysis to determine if an impairment existed for our Costa Rican Broadline and European Broadline reporting units if our estimates of fair value were decreased by 14% to 15% , respectively.  As of June 27, 2015 , these reporting units had goodwill aggregating $218.2 million .  For the remainder of our reporting units, which as of June 27, 2015 had goodwill aggregating $1.8 billion , we would have performed additional analysis to determine if an impairment existed for a reporting unit if the estimated fair value of these reporting units had declined by greater than 25%
 
Certain reporting units (Caribbean Broadline, European Broadline, specialty produce, custom-cut meat, lodging industry products, imported specialty products, international distribution operations and our Sysco Ventures platform) have a greater proportion of goodwill recorded to estimated fair value as compared to the U.S. Broadline, Canada Broadline or SYGMA reporting units. This is primarily due to these businesses having been more recently acquired, and as a result there has been less history of organic growth than in the U.S. Broadline, Canadian Broadline and SYGMA reporting units.  In addition, these businesses also have lower levels of cash flow than the U.S. Broadline reporting unit.  As such, these reporting units have a greater risk of future impairment if their operations were to suffer a significant downturn.    
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
Sysco provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors under several share-based payment arrangements including various employee stock option plans, a non-employee director plan and the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan.
 
As of June 27, 2015 , there was $69.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.42 years.
 
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.  Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of Sysco’s stock, implied volatilities from traded options on Sysco’s stock and other factors. We utilize historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior within the valuation model;

43



separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Expected dividend yield is estimated based on the historical pattern of dividends and the average stock price for the year preceding the option grant. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The fair value of each restricted stock unit award granted with a dividend equivalent is based on the company’s stock price as of the date of grant. For restricted stock units granted without dividend equivalents, the fair value is reduced by the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period.
 
The fair value of the stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is calculated as the difference between the stock price and the employee purchase price.
 
The fair value of restricted stock granted to employees or non-employee directors is based on the stock price on grant date.  The application of a discount to the fair value of a restricted stock grant is dependent upon whether or not each individual grant contains a post-vesting restriction. 
 
The compensation cost related to these share-based awards is recognized over the requisite service period. The requisite service period is generally the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The compensation cost related to stock issuances resulting from employee purchases of stock under the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan is recognized during the quarter in which the employee payroll withholdings are made.
 
Our share-based awards are generally subject to graded vesting over a service period. We will recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
 
In addition, certain of our share-based awards provide that the awards continue to vest as if the award holder continued to be an employee or director if the award holder meets certain age and years of service thresholds upon retirement. In these cases, we will recognize compensation cost for such awards over the period from the grant date to the date the employee or director first becomes eligible to retire with the options continuing to vest after retirement.
 
Our option grants include options that qualify as incentive stock options for income tax purposes.  In the period the compensation cost related to incentive stock options is recorded, a corresponding tax benefit is not recorded as it is assumed that we will not receive a tax deduction related to such incentive stock options. We may be eligible for tax deductions in subsequent periods to the extent that there is a disqualifying disposition of the incentive stock option. In such cases, we would record a tax benefit related to the tax deduction in an amount not to exceed the corresponding cumulative compensation cost recorded in the financial statements on the particular options multiplied by the statutory tax rate.
 
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements made herein that look forward in time or express management’s expectations or beliefs with respect to the occurrence of future events are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements are based on management’s current expectations and estimates.  Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” which are incorporated herein by reference. 
 
In addition to the Risk Factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, the success of Sysco’s strategic initiatives could be affected by conditions in the economy and the industry and internal factors, such as the ability to control expenses, including fuel costs.    Our expectations regarding cost per case may be impacted by factors beyond our control, including actions by our competitors and/or customers.  Company-sponsored pension plan liabilities are impacted by a number of factors including the discount rate for determining the current value of plan benefits, the assumption for the rate of increase in future compensation levels and the expected rate of return on plan assets.  The amount of shares repurchased in a given period is subject to a number of factors, including available cash and our general working capital needs at the time.  Meeting our dividend target objectives depends on our level of earnings, available cash and the success of our various strategic initiatives.  Our expectations regarding earnings per share and various items impacting earnings is subject to a number of factors, including our ability to manage operating expenses and the impact of Certain Items. Our plans with respect to growth in international markets and adjacent areas that complement our core business are subject to our other strategic initiatives, the allocation of resources, and plans and economic

44



conditions generally.  Legal proceedings and the adequacy of insurance are impacted by events, circumstances and individuals beyond the control of Sysco.  The need for additional borrowing or other capital is impacted by various factors, including capital expenditures or acquisitions in excess of those currently anticipated, levels of stock repurchases, or other unexpected cash requirements.  Plans regarding the repayment of debt are subject to change at any time based on management’s assessment of the overall needs of the company.  Capital expenditures may vary from those projected based on changes in business plans and other factors, including risks related to the timing and successful completions of acquisitions, construction schedules and the possibility that other cash requirements could result in delays or cancellations of capital spending.  Our ability to finance capital expenditures as anticipated may be influenced by our results of operations, our borrowing capacity, share repurchases, dividend levels and other factors.  Expectations regarding tax rates and the transfer of cash held in foreign jurisdictions are subject to various factors beyond our control and decisions of management throughout the fiscal year that are subject to change based on Sysco's business needs. The anticipated impact of compliance with laws and regulations also involves the risk that estimates may turn out to be materially incorrect, and laws and regulations, as well as methods of enforcement, are subject to change.
Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
We do not utilize financial instruments for trading purposes.  Our use of debt directly exposes us to interest rate risk.  Floating rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us to short-term changes in market interest rates.  Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes us to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at higher rates.
 
We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that position.  The major risks from interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions.
 
Fiscal 2015
 
As of June 27, 2015 , we had no commercial paper outstanding.  Total debt as of June 27, 2015 was $7.3 billion , of which approximately 74% was at fixed rates of interest, including the impact of our interest rate swap agreement. Included in the total debt amount is $5.0 billion in senior notes that were issued in October 2014 , for the proposed merger with US Foods. The October 2014 senior notes contained mandatory redemption features providing that, on the earlier of the merger agreement termination date or October 8, 2015 , we were required to redeem all of the senior notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal of the senior notes plus accrued interest. In June 2015, we terminated the merger agreement and redeemed the senior notes in July 2015 using cash on hand and the proceeds from borrowings under our commercial paper facility.
 
In August 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $500.0 million of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2018 to floating rate debt.  In October 2014, we also entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted $500.0 million of the new senior notes maturing on October 2, 2017 and $750.0 million of the new senior notes maturing on October 2, 2019 to floating rate debt (2014 swaps). These transactions were entered into with the goal of reducing overall borrowing cost.  The major risks from interest rate derivatives include changes in interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. These transactions were designated as fair value hedges since the swaps hedge against the change in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from changes in interest rates.  

Our 2014 swaps were terminated in July 2015. Details of our outstanding swap agreements at June 27, 2015, are below:
Maturity Date of Swap
 
Notional Value
(in millions)
 
Fixed Coupon Rate on Hedged Debt
 
Floating Interest Rate on Swap
 
Floating Rate Reset Terms
 
Location of Fair Value on Balance Sheet
 
Fair Value of Asset (Liability)
(in thousands)
October 2, 2017

$
500


1.45
%
 
Three-month LIBOR
 
Every three months in arrears
 
Other assets
 
$
2,419

February 12, 2018
 
500

 
5.25
%
 
Six-month LIBOR
 
Every six months in advance
 
Other assets
 
4,275

October 2, 2019
 
750

 
2.35
%
 
Three-month LIBOR
 
Every three months in advance
 
Other assets
 
5,903



45



     In January 2014 , in contemplation of securing financing and hedging interest rate risk relating to our assumption or refinancing of the net debt of US Foods that was scheduled to occur upon closing of the proposed merger (discussed in Note 4, “Acquisitions”), we entered into two forward starting swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $2.0 billion .  We designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges of the variability in the cash outflows of interest payments on 10 -year and 30 -year debt issued in fiscal 2015.  In September 2014, in conjunction with the pricing of the $1.25 billion senior notes maturing on October 2, 2024 and $1 billion senior notes maturing October 2, 2044, we terminated these swaps, locking in the effective yields on the related debt. Cash of $58.9 million was paid to settle the 10 -year swap in September 2014, and cash of $129.9 million was paid to settle the 30 -year swap in October 2014.

The following tables present our interest rate position as of June 27, 2015 .  All amounts are stated in United States (U.S.) dollar equivalents.
 
Interest Rate Position as of June 27, 2015
 
Principal Amount by Expected Maturity
 
Average Interest Rate
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Fair Value
 
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. $ Denominated:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Rate Debt
$
3,713,525

 
$
4,258

 
$
3,017

 
$
250,874

 
$
1,399

 
$
1,460,334

 
$
5,433,407

 
$
5,675,462

Average Interest Rate
3.8
%
 
3.6
%
 
4.4
%
 
5.5
%
 
6.1
%
 
5.1
%
 
4.5
%
 
 

Floating Rate Debt (1)
$
1,254,138

 
$
21,794

 
$
503,875

 
$
15,094

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,794,901

 
$
1,794,902

Average Interest Rate
2.0
%
 
3.9
%
 
5.4
%
 
2.9
%
 

 

 
3.0
%
 
 

Canadian $ Denominated:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Fixed Rate Debt
$
1,456

 
$
1,475

 
$
1,325

 
$
1,268

 
$
1,350

 
$
10,717

 
$
17,590

 
$
18,374

Average Interest Rate
8.3
%
 
8.3
%
 
9.0
%
 
9.6
%
 
9.7
%
 
9.8
%
 
9.5
%
 
 

  (1) Includes fixed rate debt that has been converted to floating rate debt through an interest rate swap agreement.
 
Interest Rate Position as of June 27, 2015
 
Notional Amount by Expected Maturity
 
Average Interest Swap Rate
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate Swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Related To Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay Variable/Receive Fixed
$
1,250,000

 

 
500,000

 

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,750,000

 
 
Average Variable Rate Paid:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Rate A Plus
 
 
 
 
3.2
%
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
Rate B Plus
(1)  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
Fixed Rate Received
(2)  

 
 
 
5.25
%
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
Rate A – six-month LIBOR
Rate B – three-month LIBOR
(1) 0.22% for notional amount of $500,000 maturing on October 2, 2017 and .046% for notional amount of $750,000 maturing on October 2, 2019
(2) 1.45% for notional amount of $500,000 maturing on October 2, 2017 and 2.35% for notional amount of $750,000 maturing on October 2, 2019

In August 2015, the company entered into two forward starting swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $500 million. The company designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges to reduce interest rate exposure on forecasted 10 -year debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rates for debt the company expects to issue in fiscal 2016. 



46



Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
 
The majority of our foreign subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency.  To the extent that business transactions are not denominated in a foreign subsidiary’s functional currency, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk.  We will also incur gains and losses within our shareholders’ equity due to the translation of our financial statements from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars.  Our income statement trends may be impacted by the translation of the income statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars.  The exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars negatively impacted sales by 1.0% in fiscal 2015 when compared to fiscal 2014 .  The exchange rate used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars negatively impacted sales by 0.7% in fiscal 2014 when compared to fiscal 2013 .  The impact to our operating income, net earnings and earnings per share was not material in fiscal 2015  or fiscal 2014 .  A 10% unfavorable change in the fiscal 2015 weighted year-to-date exchange rate and the resulting impact on our financial statements would have negatively impacted fiscal 2015 sales by 1.2% and would not have materially impacted our operating income, net earnings and earnings per share.  We do not routinely enter into material agreements to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risks.

Fuel Price Risk
 
Due to the nature of our distribution business, we are exposed to potential volatility in fuel prices.  The price and availability of diesel fuel fluctuates due to changes in production, seasonality and other market factors generally outside of our control.  Increased fuel costs may have a negative impact on our results of operations in three areas.  First, the high cost of fuel can negatively impact consumer confidence and discretionary spending and thus reduce the frequency and amount spent by consumers for food-away-from-home purchases.  Second, the high cost of fuel can increase the price we pay for product purchases and we may not be able to pass these costs fully to our customers.  Third, increased fuel costs impact the costs we incur to deliver product to our customers.  During fiscal 2015 fuel costs related to outbound deliveries represented approximately 0.6% of sales. For fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 , these costs represented approximately 0.7% of sales.  
 
Our activities to mitigate fuel costs include routing optimization with the goal of reducing miles driven, improving fleet utilization by adjusting idling time and maximum speeds and using fuel surcharges.  We routinely enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements.  As of June 27, 2015 , we had forward diesel fuel commitments totaling approximately $99.3 million through June 2016.  These contracts will lock in the price of approximately 40% to 45% of our fuel purchase needs for the contracted periods at prices slightly lower than the current market price for diesel.  Our remaining fuel purchase needs will occur at market rates unless contracted for a fixed price at a later date.  Using current, published quarterly market price projections for diesel and estimates of fuel consumption, a 10% unfavorable change in diesel prices from the market price would result in a potential increase of approximately $15 million in our fuel costs on our non-contracted volumes.
 
Investment Risk
 
Our company-sponsored qualified pension plan (Retirement Plan) holds investments in public and private equity, fixed income securities and real estate funds.  The amount of our annual contribution to the plan is dependent upon, among other things, the return on the plan’s assets and discount rates used to calculate the plan’s liability. Fluctuations in asset values can cause the amount of our anticipated future contributions to the plan to increase and can result in a reduction to shareholders’ equity on our balance sheet as of fiscal year-end, which is when this plan’s funded status is measured.  Also, the projected liability of the plan will be impacted by the fluctuations of interest rates on high quality bonds in the public markets.  To the extent the financial markets experience declines, our anticipated future contributions and funded status will be affected for future years.  A 10% unfavorable change in the value of the investments held by our company-sponsored Retirement Plan at the plan’s fiscal year end (December 31, 2014) would not have a material impact on our anticipated future contributions for fiscal 2016 ; however, this unfavorable change would increase our pension expense for fiscal 2016 by $31.0 million and would reduce our shareholders’ equity on our balance sheet as of June 27, 2015 by $300.3 million .

47



Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
SYSCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Page
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
 
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the information is set forth in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

48



REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
The management of Sysco Corporation (“Sysco”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company.  Sysco’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Sysco’s management assessed the effectiveness of Sysco’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2015 .  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013).  Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of June 27, 2015 , Sysco’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
 
Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of Sysco’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2015 .

49



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Sysco Corporation
 
We have audited Sysco Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2015 , based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria).  Sysco Corporation and subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) prove reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Sysco Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2015 , based on the COSO criteria.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , and the related consolidated results of operations, and statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flow for each of the three years in the period ended June 27, 2015 of Sysco Corporation and subsidiaries and our report dated August 24, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 
Houston, Texas
August 24, 2015

50



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Sysco Corporation
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sysco Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , and the related consolidated results of operations, and statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 27, 2015 .  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 27, 2015 , in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2015 , based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated August 24, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Houston, Texas
August 24, 2015

51



SYSCO
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands except for share data)
ASSETS
Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
5,130,044

 
$
413,046

Accounts and notes receivable, less allowances of $41,720 and $49,902
3,353,381

 
3,398,713

Inventories
2,691,823

 
2,602,018

Deferred income taxes
135,254

 
141,225

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
93,039

 
83,745

Prepaid income taxes
90,763

 
43,225

Total current assets
11,494,304

 
6,681,972

Plant and equipment at cost, less depreciation
3,982,143

 
3,985,618

Other assets
 

 
 

Goodwill
1,959,817

 
1,950,672

Intangibles, less amortization
154,809

 
177,227

Restricted cash
168,274

 
145,412

Other assets
229,934

 
200,212

Total other assets
2,512,834

 
2,473,523

Total assets
$
17,989,281

 
$
13,141,113

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
 
 
 
Notes payable
$
70,751

 
$
70,975

Accounts payable
2,881,953

 
2,831,028

Accrued expenses
1,467,610

 
1,160,850

Current maturities of long-term debt
4,979,301

 
304,777

Total current liabilities
9,399,615

 
4,367,630

Other liabilities
 

 
 

Long-term debt
2,271,825

 
2,357,330

Deferred income taxes
81,591

 
121,580

Other long-term liabilities
934,722

 
1,027,878

Total other liabilities
3,288,138

 
3,506,788

 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interest
41,304

 

Commitments and contingencies


 


Shareholders' equity
 

 
 

Preferred stock, par value $1 per share
    Authorized 1,500,000 shares, issued none

 

Common stock, par value $1 per share
    Authorized 2,000,000,000 shares, issued 765,174,900 shares
765,175

 
765,175

Paid-in capital
1,213,999

 
1,139,218

Retained earnings
8,751,985

 
8,770,751

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(923,197
)
 
(642,663
)
Treasury stock, 170,857,231 and 179,050,186 shares, at cost
(4,547,738
)
 
(4,765,786
)
Total shareholders' equity
5,260,224

 
5,266,695

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$
17,989,281

 
$
13,141,113

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

52



SYSCO
 
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Year Ended
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 29, 2013
 
(In thousands except for share and per share data)
Sales
$
48,680,752

 
$
46,516,712

 
$
44,411,233

Cost of sales
40,129,236

 
38,335,677

 
36,414,626

Gross profit
8,551,516

 
8,181,035

 
7,996,607

Operating expenses
7,322,154

 
6,593,913

 
6,338,129

Operating income
1,229,362

 
1,587,122

 
1,658,478

Interest expense
254,807

 
123,741

 
128,495

Other expense (income), net
(33,592
)
 
(12,243
)
 
(17,472
)
Earnings before income taxes
1,008,147

 
1,475,624

 
1,547,455

Income taxes
321,374

 
544,091

 
555,028

Net earnings
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings:
 

 
 

 
 

Basic earnings per share
$
1.16

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.68

Diluted earnings per share
1.15

 
1.58

 
1.67

 
 
 
 
 
 
Average shares outstanding
592,072,308

 
585,988,084

 
589,397,807

Diluted shares outstanding
596,849,034

 
590,216,220

 
592,675,110

 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared per common share
$
1.19

 
$
1.15

 
$
1.11

 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

53



SYSCO
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
Year Ended
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 29, 2013
 
(In thousands)
Net earnings
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
 

 
 

 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustment
(232,185
)
 
(3,106
)
 
(33,191
)
Items presented net of tax:
 

 
 

 
 

Amortization of cash flow hedges
5,116

 
385

 
386

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges
(34,111
)
 
(82,215
)
 

Amortization of prior service cost
6,949

 
6,970

 
11,310

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain), net
11,972

 
9,968

 
44,610

Amortization of transition obligation

 

 
88

Prior service cost arising in current year
(563
)
 
214

 
(33,203
)
Actuarial (loss) gain, net arising in current year
(37,712
)
 
(127,942
)
 
225,929

Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(280,534
)
 
(195,726
)
 
215,929

Comprehensive income
$
406,239

 
$
735,807

 
$
1,208,356

 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

54



SYSCO
 
CHANGES IN CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Common Stock
 
Paid-in
 
Retained
 
Comprehensive
 
Treasury Stock
 
 

 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Earnings
 
Loss
 
Shares
 
Amounts
 
Totals
 
(In thousands except for share data)
Balance as of June 30, 2012
765,174,900

 
$
765,175

 
$
939,179

 
$
8,175,230

 
$
(662,866
)
 
179,228,383

 
$
(4,531,678
)
 
$
4,685,040

Net earnings
 

 
 

 
 

 
992,427

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
992,427

Foreign currency translation adjustment
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(33,191
)
 
 

 
 

 
(33,191
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
386

 
 

 
 

 
386

Reclassification of pension and other postretirement benefit plans amounts to net earnings, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
56,008

 
 

 
 

 
56,008

Pension funded status adjustment, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
192,726

 
 

 
 

 
192,726

Dividends declared
 

 
 

 
 

 
(654,871
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(654,871
)
Treasury stock purchases
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
21,897,403

 
(729,333
)
 
(729,333
)
Share-based compensation awards
 

 
 

 
120,445

 
 

 
 

 
(22,057,356
)
 
562,173

 
682,618

Balance as of June 29, 2013
765,174,900

 
$
765,175

 
$
1,059,624

 
$
8,512,786

 
$
(446,937
)
 
179,068,430

 
$
(4,698,838
)
 
$
5,191,810

Net earnings
 

 
 

 
 

 
931,533

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
931,533

Foreign currency translation adjustment
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(3,106
)
 
 

 
 

 
(3,106
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
385

 
 

 
 

 
385

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(82,215
)
 
 

 
 

 
(82,215
)
Reclassification of pension and other postretirement benefit plans amounts to net earnings, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
16,938

 
 

 
 

 
16,938

Pension funded status adjustment, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(127,728
)
 
 

 
 

 
(127,728
)
Dividends declared
 

 
 

 
 

 
(673,568
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(673,568
)
Treasury stock purchases
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
9,834,000

 
(324,665
)
 
(324,665
)
Share-based compensation awards
 

 
 

 
79,594

 
 

 
 

 
(9,852,244
)
 
257,717

 
337,311

Balance as of June 28, 2014
765,174,900

 
$
765,175

 
$
1,139,218

 
$
8,770,751

 
$
(642,663
)
 
179,050,186

 
$
(4,765,786
)
 
$
5,266,695

Net earnings
 

 
 

 
 

 
686,773

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
686,773

Foreign currency translation adjustment
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(232,185
)
 
 

 
 

 
(232,185
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
5,116

 
 

 
 

 
5,116

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(34,111
)
 
 

 
 

 
(34,111
)
Reclassification of pension and other postretirement benefit plans amounts to net earnings, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
18,921

 
 

 
 

 
18,921

Pension funded status adjustment, net of tax
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(38,275
)
 
 

 
 

 
(38,275
)
Dividends declared
 

 
 

 
 

 
(705,539
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(705,539
)
Share-based compensation awards
 

 
 

 
74,781

 
 

 
 

 
(8,192,955
)
 
218,048

 
292,829

Balance as of June 27, 2015
765,174,900

 
$
765,175

 
$
1,213,999

 
$
8,751,985

 
$
(923,197
)
 
170,857,231

 
$
(4,547,738
)
 
$
5,260,224


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

55



SYSCO

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
 
Year Ended
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 29, 2013
 
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 

 
 

 
 

Net earnings
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities:
 

 
 

 
 

Share-based compensation expense
73,766

 
74,328

 
70,147

Depreciation and amortization
553,021

 
547,776

 
510,061

Amortization of debt issuance and other debt-related costs
27,943

 
8,286

 
2,487

Deferred income taxes
(4,705
)
 
(30,665
)
 
(28,129
)
Provision for losses on receivables
17,996

 
34,429

 
35,243

Other non-cash items
(24,205
)
 
2,875

 
2,485

Additional investment in certain assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses acquired:
 

 
 

 
 

(Increase) in receivables
(11,741
)
 
(236,320
)
 
(193,755
)
(Increase) in inventories
(125,232
)
 
(195,845
)
 
(180,277
)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
(10,508
)
 
(24,787
)
 
21,704

Increase in accounts payable
72,516

 
392,720

 
204,861

Increase in accrued expenses
464,403

 
55,838

 
67,015

(Decrease) in accrued income taxes
(32,843
)
 
(18,672
)
 
(38,017
)
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(10,745
)
 
23,552

 
182

(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities
(105,501
)
 
(63,753
)
 
49,716

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
(15,454
)
 
(8,480
)
 
(4,556
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,555,484

 
1,492,815

 
1,511,594

Cash flows from investing activities:
 

 
 

 
 

Additions to plant and equipment
(542,830
)
 
(523,206
)
 
(511,862
)
Proceeds from sales of plant and equipment
24,472

 
25,790

 
15,527

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
(115,862
)
 
(79,338
)
 
(397,447
)
(Increase) in restricted cash
(20,126
)
 
(84
)
 
(18,100
)
Net cash used for investing activities
(654,346
)
 
(576,838
)
 
(911,882
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 

 
 

 
 

Bank and commercial paper borrowings (repayments), net
(129,999
)
 
34,499

 
95,500

Other debt borrowings
5,041,032

 
36,830

 
61,467

Other debt repayments
(354,007
)
 
(229,507
)
 
(294,514
)
Debt issuance costs
(30,980
)
 
(22,175
)
 

Cash paid for settlement of cash flow hedges
(188,840
)
 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises
240,176

 
255,613

 
628,652

Treasury stock purchases

 
(332,381
)
 
(721,616
)
Dividends paid
(695,274
)
 
(667,217
)
 
(648,253
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
15,454

 
8,480

 
4,556

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
3,897,562

 
(915,858
)
 
(874,208
)
Effect of exchange rates on cash
(81,702
)
 
642

 
(2,086
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,716,998

 
761

 
(276,582
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
413,046

 
412,285

 
688,867

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
5,130,044

 
$
413,046

 
$
412,285

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
 

 
 

 
 

Cash paid during the period for:
 

 
 

 
 

Interest
$
192,939

 
$
128,861

 
$
131,665

Income taxes
376,508

 
591,334

 
620,132

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

56



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Business and Consolidation
 
Sysco Corporation, acting through its subsidiaries and divisions (Sysco or the company), is engaged in the marketing and distribution of a wide range of food and related products primarily to the foodservice or food-away-from-home industry.  These services are performed for approximately 425,000 customers from 197 distribution facilities located throughout the United States (U.S.), Bahamas, Canada and Ireland.
 
Sysco’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to June 30 th .  This resulted in a 52-week year ending June 27, 2015 for fiscal 2015 , June 28, 2014 for fiscal 2014 and June 29, 2013 for fiscal 2013 .
 
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of Sysco and its consolidated subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated.
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses.  Actual results could differ from the estimates used.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash includes cash equivalents such as time deposits, certificates of deposit, short-term investments and all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less, which are recorded at fair value.
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable consist primarily of trade receivables from customers and receivables from suppliers for marketing or incentive programs.  Sysco determines the past due status of trade receivables based on contractual terms with each customer.  Sysco evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable and determines the appropriate reserve for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors.  The company utilizes specific criteria to determine uncollectible receivables to be written off including whether a customer has filed for or been placed in bankruptcy, has had accounts referred to outside parties for collection or has had accounts past due over specified periods.  In these instances, a specific allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded to reduce the receivable to the net amount reasonably expected to be collected. Allowances are recorded for all other receivables based on an analysis of historical trends of write-offs and recoveries.  
 
Inventories
 
Inventories consisting primarily of finished goods include food and related products and lodging products held for resale and are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.  Elements of costs include the purchase price of the product and freight charges to deliver the product to the company’s warehouses and are net of certain cash or non-cash consideration received from vendors (see “Vendor Consideration”).
 
Plant and Equipment
 
Capital additions, improvements and major replacements are classified as plant and equipment and are carried at cost.  Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method, which reduces the book value of each asset in equal amounts over its estimated useful life, and is included within operating expenses in the consolidated results of operations.  Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to earnings when they are incurred.  Upon the disposition of an asset, its accumulated depreciation is deducted from the original cost, and any gain or loss is reflected in current earnings.
 
Certain internal and external costs related to the acquisition and development of internal use software are capitalized within plant and equipment during the application development stages of the project.  
 
Applicable interest charges incurred during the construction of new facilities and development of software for internal use are capitalized as one of the elements of cost and are amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives.  Interest capitalized for the past three fiscal years was $0.9 million in fiscal 2015 , $1.1 million in fiscal 2014 and $4.2 million in fiscal 2013 .


57



Long-Lived Assets
 
Management reviews long-lived assets for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over the asset’s useful life based on updated projections on an undiscounted basis.  If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured using fair value.
 
Goodwill and Intangibles
 
Goodwill and intangibles represent the excess of cost over the fair value of tangible net assets acquired.  Goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives are not amortized.  Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of a business combination.  The recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles is assessed annually, or more frequently as needed when events or changes have occurred that would suggest an impairment of carrying value, by determining whether the fair values of the applicable reporting units exceed their carrying values.  The reporting units used to assess goodwill impairment are the company’s 13 operating segments as described in Note 21, “Business Segment Information.” The components within each of the 13 operating segments have similar economic characteristics and therefore are aggregated into 13 reporting units.  The evaluation of fair value requires the use of projections, estimates and assumptions as to the future performance of the operations in performing a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as assumptions regarding sales and earnings multiples that would be applied in comparable acquisitions.
 
Intangibles with definite lives are amortized over their useful lives in a manner consistent with underlying cash flow, which generally ranges from two to ten years .  Management reviews finite-lived intangibles for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Cash flows expected to be generated by the finite-lived intangibles are estimated over the intangible asset’s useful life based on updated projections on an undiscounted basis.  If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value of the finite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured at fair value.
 
Restricted Cash
 
Sysco is required by its insurers to collateralize a part of the self-insured portion of its workers’ compensation and liability claims.  Sysco has chosen to satisfy these collateral requirements by depositing funds in insurance trusts or by issuing letters of credit.  All amounts in restricted cash at June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 represented funds deposited in insurance trusts.
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
All derivatives are recognized as assets or liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets at fair value at their gross values.  Gains or losses on derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges are recognized immediately in the consolidated results of operations, along with the offsetting gain or loss related to the underlying hedged item.
 
Gains or losses on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity from inception of the hedges to their settlement, at which time gains or losses are reclassified to the Consolidated Results of Operations in conjunction with the recognition of the underlying hedged item.
 
In the normal course of business, Sysco enters into forward purchase agreements for the procurement of fuel and electricity.  Certain of these agreements meet the definition of a derivative.  However, the company elected to use the normal purchase and sale exemption available under derivatives accounting literature; therefore, these agreements are not recorded at fair value.
 
Investments in Corporate-Owned Life Insurance
 
Investments in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies are recorded at their cash surrender values as of each balance sheet date.  Changes in the cash surrender value during the period are recorded as a gain or loss within operating expenses.  The company does not record deferred tax balances related to cash surrender value gains or losses for the policies that Sysco has the ability and intent to hold to maturity.  Deferred tax balances are recorded for those policies that Sysco intends to redeem prior to maturity.  The total amounts related to the company’s investments in COLI policies included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets were $162.8 million and $161.9 million at June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , respectively.
 

58



Treasury Stock
 
The company records treasury stock purchases at cost.  Shares removed from treasury are valued at cost using the average cost method.

Foreign Currency Translation
 
The assets and liabilities of all foreign subsidiaries are translated at current exchange rates.  Related translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The company recognizes revenue from the sale of a product when it is considered to be realized or realizable and earned.  The company determines these requirements to be met at the point at which the product is delivered to the customer.  The company grants certain customers sales incentives such as rebates or discounts and treats these as a reduction of sales at the time the sale is recognized.  Sales tax collected from customers is not included in revenue but rather recorded as a liability due to the respective taxing authorities.  Purchases and sales of inventory with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another are considered to be a single nonmonetary transaction.  As such, the company records the net effect of such transactions in the consolidated results of operations within sales.
 
Vendor Consideration
 
Sysco recognizes consideration received from vendors when the services performed in connection with the monies received are completed and when the related product has been sold by Sysco as a reduction to cost of sales.  There are several types of cash consideration received from vendors.  In many instances, the vendor consideration is in the form of a specified amount per case or per pound.  In these instances, Sysco will recognize the vendor consideration as a reduction of cost of sales when the product is sold.  In the situations in which the vendor consideration is not related directly to specific product purchases, Sysco will recognize these as a reduction of cost of sales when the earnings process is complete, the related service is performed and the amounts are realized. 
 
Shipping and Handling Costs
 
Shipping and handling costs include costs associated with the selection of products and delivery to customers.  Included in operating expenses are shipping and handling costs of approximately $2.6 billion in fiscal 2015 , $2.6 billion in fiscal 2014 and $2.5 billion in fiscal 2013 .
 
Insurance Program
 
Sysco maintains a self-insurance program covering portions of workers’ compensation, general and vehicle liability and property insurance costs.  The amounts in excess of the self-insured levels are fully insured by third party insurers.  The company also maintains a fully self-insured group medical program.  Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, medical cost trends, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. 
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
Sysco recognizes expense for its share-based compensation based on the fair value of the awards that are granted.  The fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  Option pricing methods require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.  The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards are based on the company’s stock price on the date of grant.  Measured compensation cost is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the related share-based compensation award.  Cash flows resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) are classified as financing cash flows on the consolidated cash flows statements.
 
Income Taxes
 
Sysco recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured pursuant to tax laws using rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The impact on deferred tax assets and liabilities

59



of a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized.
 
Sysco recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position.  The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.  To the extent interest and penalties may be assessed by taxing authorities on any underpayment of income tax, estimated amounts required by the accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions have been accrued and are classified as a component of income taxes in the consolidated results of operations.

The determination of the company’s provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws.  The company’s provision for income taxes primarily reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in the various U.S. federal and state, as well as various foreign jurisdictions.  Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or decreases in permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals for tax contingencies or valuation allowances, and the company’s change in the mix of earnings from these taxing jurisdictions all affect the overall effective tax rate.
 
Acquisitions
 
Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, and the financial statements include the results of the acquired operations from the respective dates of acquisition.
 
The purchase price of the acquired entities is allocated to the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value at the dates of acquisition, with any excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, including intangibles, recognized as goodwill.  The balances included in the consolidated balance sheets related to recent acquisitions are based upon preliminary information and are subject to change when final asset and liability valuations are obtained.  Subsequent changes to the preliminary balances are reflected retrospectively, if material.  Material changes to the preliminary allocations are not anticipated by management.

Noncontrolling interest

In fiscal 2015, Sysco acquired a 50% interest in a foodservice company in Costa Rica. It was determined that consolidation of the entity was appropriate and, therefore, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for this company have been included in Sysco’s financial statements. The value of the 50% noncontrolling interest is considered redeemable due to certain features of the investment agreement and has been presented as mezzanine equity, which is outside of permanent equity, in the consolidated balance sheets. The income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is located within other expense (income), net in the consolidated results of operations, as this amount is not material. The non-cash add back for the change in the value of the noncontrolling interest is located within Other non-cash items on the consolidated cash flows.
 
2. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING
 
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists
 
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” This update amends ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” to require that in certain cases, an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when such items exist in the same taxing jurisdiction. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, which was fiscal 2015 for Sysco. The company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03,  Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs . The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, instead of being presented as an

60



asset. Debt disclosures will include the face amount of the debt liability and the effective interest rate. The update requires retrospective application and represents a change in accounting principle. We adopted this standard for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015 . Although the new guidance had no impact on the company’s results of operations, the debt issuance costs presented as assets within the company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 28, 2014 , of $26.8 million has been reclassified as reductions of the related debt liability as a result of early adoption.

Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer's Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets." The amendments in this ASU provide a practical expedient for employers with fiscal year-ends that do not fall on a month-end by permitting those employers to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the month-end that is closest to the entity's fiscal year-end. Sysco early adopted this standard in fiscal 2015 using a June 30th measurement date as a practical expedient. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial position of Sysco.

3. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
 
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” This update amends ASC 205, “Presentation of Financial Statements,” and ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” primarily to change the criteria for when a disposal is required to be reported as a discontinued operation. A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on the entity’s operations or financial results. The amendments in this update specify presentation and disclosure requirements for discontinued operations as well as disclosure requirements for other disposals that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments in this update are effective for all disposals or classifications as held for sale, including upon acquisition, of a component of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within those years, which is fiscal 2016 for Sysco. Early adoption is permitted. Sysco will implement on any related transactions, prospectively.
 
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This update creates ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition.” Additionally, other sections of the ASC were amended to be consistent with the guidance in this update. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. A five-step revenue recognition model is to be applied to achieve this core principle. ASC 606 also specifies comprehensive disclosures to help users of financial statements understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, which is fiscal 2019 for Sysco. Early adoption is not permitted. Sysco is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its financial statements.

Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This ASU provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This guidance is effective for fiscal years—and interim periods within those fiscal years—beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the new standard and whether it will early adopt.

4. ACQUISITIONS
 
During fiscal 2015 , in the aggregate, the company paid cash of $115.9 million , net of cash acquired, for acquisitions made during fiscal 2015 and for contingent consideration related to acquisitions made in previous fiscal years. During fiscal 2015 , Sysco

61



acquired for cash a broadline company in Ontario, Canada; a joint venture interest in a foodservice distribution company in Mexico; a joint venture interest in a foodservice distribution company in Costa Rica and a specialty seafood company in New Jersey.  The fiscal 2015 acquisitions were immaterial, individually and in the aggregate, to the consolidated financial statements. 
 
Certain acquisitions involve contingent consideration that may include earnout agreements that are typically payable over periods of up to three years only in the event that certain operating results are attained. As of June 27, 2015 , aggregate contingent consideration amounts outstanding relating to completed acquisitions were $39.0 million , of which $29.4 million was recorded as earnout liabilities as of June 27, 2015 .
 
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the company announced an agreement to merge with US Foods, Inc. (US Foods).  In February 2015, following completion of its regulatory review of the proposed merger, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (the Court) seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the parties from closing the merger, which the Court granted on June 23, 2015.  On June 26, 2015, the parties terminated the merger agreement, as a result of which Sysco was obligated to pay $300 million to the owners of US Foods. During the review period with the FTC, Sysco created a divestiture package, comprised of the sale of 11 US Foods facilities to Performance Food Group (PFG), which was contingent on the closing of the merger. This divestiture agreement entitled PFG to receive a $25 million termination fee if the sale of the divestiture package was terminated before July 6, 2015, with each of Sysco and US Foods responsible for one half of the applicable fee. Sysco accrued for termination payments totaling $312.5 million in fiscal 2015 and paid these amounts in fiscal 2016 .

At the time of the merger announcement, Sysco secured a fully committed bridge financing that could be used for funding a portion of the purchase price. In contemplation of issuing long-term financing for this proposed merger, in January 2014, the company entered into two forward starting swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $2 billion to reduce interest rate exposure on 10 -year and 30 -year debt that was anticipated to be issued. In October 2014, Sysco obtained long-term financing for this proposed merger by completing a six-part senior notes offering totaling $5 billion . At the same time, (i) the bridge financing was terminated and (ii) the forward starting interest rate swaps were terminated and cash settlement of these swaps was made. Concurrent with the issuance of the new senior notes, Sysco entered into new interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted two series of the senior notes totaling $1.25 billion to floating rate debt. These swaps were designated as fair value hedges. These senior notes contained mandatory redemption features providing that, on the earlier of the merger agreement termination date or October 8, 2015 , the company was required to redeem all of the senior notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal of the senior notes plus accrued interest. These notes were redeemed in July 2015. Detailed discussion of these transactions is located in Note 9, "Derivative Financial Instruments", and Note 11, "Debt and Other Financing Arrangements."
 

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price).  The accounting guidance includes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which include management’s own assumption about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.
 
Sysco’s policy is to invest in only high-quality investments.  Cash equivalents primarily include time deposits, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, high-quality money market funds and all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less.  Restricted cash consists of investments in high-quality money market funds.  
 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
 
Time deposits and commercial paper included in cash equivalents are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.  These are included within cash equivalents as a Level 2 measurement in the tables below.
Money market funds are valued at the closing price reported by the fund sponsor from an actively traded exchange.  These are included within cash equivalents and restricted cash as Level 1 measurements in the tables below.

62



The interest rate swap agreements, discussed further in Note 9, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” are valued using a swap valuation model that utilizes an income approach using observable market inputs including interest rates, LIBOR swap rates and credit default swap rates.  These are included within other assets and accrued expenses as Level 2 measurements in the tables below.
 
The following tables present the company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 :  
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value as of June 27, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash equivalents
$
4,677,735

 
$
63,689

 
$

 
$
4,741,424

Restricted cash
168,274

 

 

 
168,274

Other assets
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest rate swap agreements

 
12,597

 

 
12,597

Total assets at fair value
$
4,846,009

 
$
76,286

 
$

 
$
4,922,295

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Current portion of long-term debt
$

 
$
1,257,127

 
$

 
$
1,257,127

Long-term debt

 
$
503,379

 
$

 
$
503,379

Total liabilities at fair value
$

 
$
1,760,506

 
$

 
$
1,760,506

 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value as of June 28, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash equivalents
$
2,770

 
$
131,966

 
$

 
$
134,736

Restricted cash
145,412

 

 

 
145,412

Other assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreement

 
4,828

 

 
4,828

Total assets at fair value
$
148,182

 
$
136,794

 
$

 
$
284,976

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Accrued expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements
$

 
$
133,466

 
$

 
$
133,466

Total liabilities at fair value
$

 
$
133,466

 
$

 
$
133,466

 
The carrying values of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their respective fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.  The fair value of Sysco’s total debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issue or on the current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities and is considered a Level 2 measurement.  The fair value of total debt approximated $7.6 billion and $3.0 billion as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , respectively.  The carrying value of total debt was $7.3 billion and $2.7 billion as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , respectively.

63



6.  ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
 
A summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts appears below:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
49,902

 
$
47,345

 
$
42,919

Charged to costs and expenses
17,996

 
34,429

 
35,243

Customer accounts written off, net of recoveries
(25,719
)
 
(31,721
)
 
(30,824
)
Other adjustments
(459
)
 
(151
)
 
7

Balance at end of period
$
41,720

 
$
49,902

 
$
47,345

 
 
7. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
A summary of plant and equipment, including the related accumulated depreciation, appears below:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
Estimated Useful Lives
 
(In thousands)
 
 
Plant and equipment at cost:
 

 
 

 
 
Land
$
441,939

 
$
431,694

 
 
Buildings and improvements
3,877,817

 
3,816,387

 
10-30 years
Fleet and equipment
2,836,554

 
2,726,415

 
3-10 years
Computer hardware and software
1,234,138

 
1,109,379

 
3-7 years
Total plant and equipment at cost
8,390,448

 
8,083,875

 
 
Accumulated depreciation
(4,408,305
)
 
(4,098,257
)
 
 
Total plant and equipment, net
$
3,982,143

 
$
3,985,618

 
 
 
The capitalized direct costs for the internal use software portion of the company’s Enterprise Resource Planning system are included within “computer hardware and software” in the table above in the amount of $293.8 million and $355.2 million , net of accumulated amortization, as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , respectively.  The majority of this internal use software was placed into service and began amortization in August of fiscal 2013.
 
Depreciation expense, including amortization of capital leases, for the past three years was $495.8 million in 2015 , $493.8 million in 2014 and $473.5 million in 2013 .
8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
 
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and the amount allocated by reportable segment for the years presented are as follows:
 
Broadline
 
SYGMA
 
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Carrying amount as of June 29, 2013
$
1,123,419

 
$
32,609

 
$
728,207

 
$
1,884,235

Goodwill acquired during year
48,425

 

 
14,408

 
62,833

Currency translation/other
3,649

 

 
(45
)
 
3,604

Carrying amount as of June 28, 2014
1,175,493

 
32,609

 
742,570

 
1,950,672

Goodwill acquired during year
79,802

 

 
8,408

 
88,210

Currency translation/other
(78,524
)
 

 
(541
)
 
(79,065
)
Carrying amount as of June 27, 2015
$
1,176,771

 
$
32,609

 
$
750,437

 
$
1,959,817

 
Amortizable intangible assets acquired during fiscal 2015 were $27.7 million with a weighted-average amortization period of 7.9 years .  By intangible asset category, the amortizable intangible assets acquired during fiscal 2015 were customer relationships of $19.5 million with a weighted-average amortization period of 9.4 years , non-compete agreements of $4.3 million

64



with a weighted-average amortization period of 4.6 years and other intangibles of $3.9 million with a weighted-average amortization period of 4.0 years
 
The following table presents details of the company’s amortizable intangible assets:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
(In thousands)
Customer relationships
$
236,916

 
$
(130,506
)
 
$
106,410

 
$
246,019

 
$
(124,223
)
 
$
121,796

Non-compete agreements
33,436

 
(14,525
)
 
18,911

 
33,164

 
(10,629
)
 
22,535

Trademarks
10,768

 
(4,117
)
 
6,651

 
12,063

 
(3,200
)
 
8,863

Other
13,437

 
(4,871
)
 
8,566

 
13,498

 
(2,070
)
 
11,428

Total amortizable intangible
assets
$
294,557

 
$
(154,019
)
 
$
140,538

 
$
304,744

 
$
(140,122
)
 
$
164,622


Intangible assets that have been fully amortized have been removed in the schedule above in the period full amortization is reached.
 
The following table presents details of the company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Trademarks
$
13,304

 
$
11,639

Licenses
966

 
966

Total indefinite-lived intangible assets
$
14,271

 
$
12,605

 
Amortization expense for the past three years was $40.0 million in 2015 , $42.2 million in 2014 and $32.1 million in 2013 .  The estimated future amortization expense for the next five fiscal years on intangible assets outstanding as of June 27, 2015 is shown below:
 
Amount
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
33,570

2017
29,264

2018
26,162

2019
16,245

2020
12,215

9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
Sysco manages its debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps from time to time to achieve this position.  The company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

     In fiscal 2014, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $500 million of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2018 to floating rate debt.  In October 2014, Sysco obtained long-term financing for the proposed US Foods merger by completing a six-part senior notes offering totaling $5 billion . At the same time of these note issuances, the company entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted $500 million of senior notes maturing in fiscal 2018 and $750 million of senior notes maturing in fiscal 2020 to floating rate debt. These are collectively referred to as the 2015 swaps. See Note 11, "Debt and Other Financing Arrangements," for further discussion of the senior notes issuance. These transactions were designated as fair value hedges against the changes in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from changes in interest rates. Subsequent to fiscal 2015, we terminated our 2015 swaps in connection with the redemption of the senior notes.
    
In January 2014, the company entered into two forward starting swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $2.0 billion in contemplation of securing long-term financing for the proposed US Foods merger or for other long-term financing purposes in the event the merger did not occur. The company designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges to reduce interest

65



rate exposure on forecasted 10 -year and 30 -year debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rates for debt the company issued in fiscal 2015.  In September 2014, in conjunction with the pricing of the $1.25 billion senior notes maturing in fiscal 2025 and the $1 billion senior notes maturing in fiscal 2045, the company terminated these swaps, locking in the effective yields on the related debt. Cash of $58.9 million was paid to settle the 10 -year swap in September 2014, and cash of $129.9 million was paid to settle the 30 -year swap in October 2014. The cash payments are located within the line Cash paid for settlement of cash flow hedge within financing activities in the statement of consolidated cash flows. The cumulative losses recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income related to these swaps will continue to be amortized through interest expense over the term of the originally issued debt as the amount hedged is anticipated to remain within our capital structure. 

In August 2015, the company entered into two forward starting swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $500 million . The company designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges to reduce interest rate exposure on forecasted 10 -year debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rates for debt the company expects to issue in fiscal 2016. 
 
The location and the fair value of derivative instruments designated as hedges in the consolidated balance sheet as of each fiscal year-end are as follows:
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

June 27, 2015
Other assets
 
$
12,597

 
Accrued expenses
 
$

June 28, 2014
Other assets
 
4,828

 
Accrued expenses
 
133,466

 
The location and effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on the consolidated comprehensive income for each fiscal year presented on a pretax basis are as follows:
 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) or Loss
 
 
 
Recognized in Comprehensive Income
 
Location of (Gain) or Loss Recognized in  Comprehensive Income
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Fair Value Hedge Relationships:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest rate swap agreements
Interest expense
 
$
(21,960
)
 
$
(10,879
)
 
$
(4,492
)
Cash Flow Hedge Relationships:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Forward starting interest rate swap agreements
Other comprehensive income
 

 
$
133,466

 
N/A

Forward starting interest rate swap agreements (1)
Interest expense
 
8,305

 
625

 
626


(1) Represents amortization of losses on forward starting interest rate swap agreements that were previously settled.
    
Hedge ineffectiveness represents the difference between the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and the changes in fair value of the fixed rate debt attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rates.  Hedge ineffectiveness is recorded directly in earnings within interest expense and was immaterial for fiscal 2015 , fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 .  The interest rate swaps do not contain credit-risk-related contingent features.

66



10. SELF-INSURED LIABILITIES
 
Sysco maintains a self-insurance program covering portions of workers’ compensation, general and vehicle liability and property insurance costs.  The amounts in excess of the self-insured levels are fully insured by third party insurers.  The company also maintains a fully self-insured group medical program.  A summary of the activity in self-insured liabilities appears below:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
194,476

 
$
147,598

 
$
129,749

Charged to costs and expenses
367,025

 
375,267

 
352,374

Payments
(368,189
)
 
(328,389
)
 
(334,525
)
Balance at end of period
$
193,312

 
$
194,476

 
$
147,598

11. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
 
Sysco’s debt consists of the following:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Commercial paper, interest averaging 0.2% as of June 28, 2014
$

 
$
129,999

Senior notes, interest at 0.55%, maturing in fiscal 2015

 
299,015

Senior notes, interest at 5.25%, maturing in fiscal 2018  (1)
502,608

 
502,521

Senior notes, interest at 5.375%, maturing in fiscal 2019 (1)
248,824

 
248,509

Senior notes, interest at 2.6%, maturing in fiscal 2022 (1)
444,212

 
443,384

Debentures, interest at 7.16%, maturing in fiscal 2027  (2)
50,000

 
50,000

Debentures, interest at 6.5%, maturing in fiscal 2029  (1)
223,610

 
223,505

Senior notes, interest at 5.375%, maturing in fiscal 2036  (1)
496,775

 
495,636

Senior notes, interest at 6.625%, maturing in fiscal 2039 (1)
244,415

 
244,180

Senior notes, interest at 1.45%, maturing in fiscal 2018 (1), (3)
500,801

 

Senior notes, interest at 2.35% maturing in fiscal 2020 (1), (3)
752,070

 

Senior notes, interest at 3.00% , maturing in fiscal 2022 (1), (3)
745,136

 

Senior notes, interest at 3.50% , maturing in fiscal 2025 (1), (3)
1,239,116

 

Senior notes, interest at 4.35%, maturing in fiscal 2035 (1), (3)
742,664

 

Senior notes, interest at 4.50%, maturing in fiscal 2045 (1), (3)
981,813

 

Notes payable, capital leases, and other debt, interest averaging 2.81% and maturing at various dates to fiscal 2026 as of June 27, 2015 and 2.59% and maturing at various dates to fiscal 2029 as of June 28, 2014
149,833

 
96,333

Total debt
7,321,877

 
2,733,082

Less current maturities of long-term debt
(4,979,301
)
 
(304,777
)
Less notes payable
(70,751
)
 
(70,975
)
Net long-term debt
$
2,271,825

 
$
2,357,330

 
(1) Represents senior notes that are unsecured, are not subject to any sinking fund requirement and include a redemption provision that allows Sysco to retire the debentures and notes at any time prior to maturity at the greater of par plus accrued interest or an amount designed to ensure that the debenture and note holders are not penalized by the early redemption.

(2) This debenture is not subject to any sinking fund requirement and is no longer redeemable prior to maturity.

(3) Represents senior notes that were redeemed in July 2015 under a mandatory redemption feature.


67



As of June 27, 2015 , the principal payments required to be made during the next five fiscal years on long-term debt, excluding notes payable and commercial paper, are shown below:
 
Amount
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
5,007,943

2017
29,140

2018
506,694

2019
269,532

2020
3,387


Commercial Paper and Revolving Credit Facility
 
Sysco has a commercial paper program allowing the company to issue short-term unsecured notes in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.5 billion
 
Sysco and one of its subsidiaries, Sysco International, ULC, have a revolving credit facility supporting the company’s U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs.  The facility provides for borrowings in both U.S. and Canadian dollars.  Borrowings by Sysco International, ULC under the agreement are guaranteed by Sysco, and borrowings by Sysco and Sysco International, ULC under the credit agreement are guaranteed by the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Sysco that are guarantors of the company’s senior notes and debentures.  The facility, in the amount of $1.5 billion , expires on December 29, 2018 , but is subject to extension.  As of June 27, 2015 , there were no commercial paper issuances outstanding. In periods where Sysco has commercial paper borrowings, the amounts are classified within long-term debt, as the program is supported by long-term revolving credit facility described above.
 
During fiscal 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , aggregate outstanding commercial paper issuances ranged from approximately zero to $659.4 million zero to $770.5 million , and zero to $330.0 million , respectively.
   
Fixed Rate Debt

In February 2013, Sysco repaid 4.2% senior notes totaling $250.0 million at maturity utilizing a combination of cash flow from operations and cash on hand.
 
In March 2014, Sysco repaid 4.6% senior notes totaling $200.0 million at maturity utilizing a combination of cash flow from operations and commercial paper issuances.

In June 2015, Sysco repaid 0.55% senior notes totaling $300.0 million at maturity utilizing a combination of cash flow from operations and cash on hand.
 
In October 2014, Sysco issued senior notes and terminated a previously outstanding unsecured bridge facility that was established in December 2013 as a potential financing mechanism for funding the proposed US Foods merger until longer-term funding could be obtained. The senior notes, issued under the company’s previous February 2012 registration statement, were unsecured, were not subject to any sinking fund requirement and included a redemption provision that allowed Sysco to retire the notes at any time prior to maturity at the greater of par plus accrued interest or an amount designed to ensure that the note holders are not penalized by early redemption. These senior notes contained mandatory redemption features providing that, on the earlier of the merger agreement termination date or October 8, 2015 , Sysco was required to redeem all of the senior notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal of the senior notes plus accrued interest. In June 2015, we terminated the merger agreement, and we redeemed the senior notes in July 2015 using cash on hand and the proceeds from borrowings under our commercial paper program. The senior notes were classified as current maturities of long-term debt as of June 27, 2015. Details of the senior notes are below:


68



Maturity Date
 
Par Value
(in millions)
 
Coupon Rate
 
Pricing
(percentage of par)
October 2, 2017
 
$
500

 
1.45

%
 
99.962
%
October 2, 2019
 
 
750

 
2.35

 
 
99.864
 
October 2, 2021
 
 
750

 
3.00

 
 
99.781
 
October 2, 2024
 
 
1,250

 
3.50

 
 
99.616
 
October 2, 2034
 
 
750

 
4.35

 
 
99.841
 
October 2, 2044
 
 
1,000

 
4.50

 
 
98.992
 
 
T otal Debt
 
Total debt as of June 27, 2015 was $7.3 billion , of which approximately 74% was at fixed rates with a weighted average of  4.3% and an average life of 4.37 years, and the remainder was at floating rates with a weighted average of 2.9% and an average life of 0.84 years.  Certain loan agreements contain typical debt covenants to protect note holders, including provisions to maintain the company’s long-term debt to total capital ratio below a specified level.  Sysco is currently in compliance with all debt covenants.
 
Other
 
As of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , letters of credit outstanding were $101.0 million and $45.7 million , respectively.
12. LEASES
 
Sysco has obligations under capital and operating leases for certain distribution facilities, vehicles and computers.  Total rental expense under operating leases was $104.3 million , $92.3 million , and $84.4 million in fiscal 2015 , 2014  and 2013 , respectively. Contingent rentals, subleases and assets and obligations under capital leases are not significant.
 
Aggregate minimum lease payments by fiscal year under existing long-term operating leases are as follows:
 
Amount
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
47,559

2017
38,183

2018
27,831

2019
20,320

2020
16,661

Thereafter
45,670

13.  OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
 
The following table presents details of the company’s other long-term liabilities:
 
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Retirement Plan
$
227,352

 
$
270,189

Supplemental executive retirement plan
420,704

 
438,288

Other
286,666

 
319,401

Total
$
934,722

 
$
1,027,878

14.  COMPANY-SPONSORED EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
 
Sysco has company-sponsored defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans for its employees.  Also, the company provides certain health care benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents.
 

69



Defined Contribution Plans
 
In December 2012, the company amended its defined contribution 401(k) Plan to be a Safe Harbor Plan, a plan that treats all employees’ benefits equally within the plan, under Sections 401(k) and 401(m) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to non-union employees and those union employees whose unions adopted the Safe Harbor Plan provisions.  Effective January 1, 2013, the new Safe Harbor Plan provides that the company will make a non-elective contribution each pay period equal to 3% of a participant’s compensation.  Additionally, the company will make matching contributions of 50% of a participant’s pre-tax contribution on the first 5% of the participant’s compensation contributed by the participant.  Certain employees are also eligible for a transition contribution, and the company may also make discretionary contributions.  For union employees who are members of unions that did not adopt the Safe Harbor Plan provisions, the plan provides that under certain circumstances the company may make matching contributions of up to 50% of the first 6% of a participant’s compensation. 
Prior to the adoption of the Safe Harbor Plan in January 2013, the company’s defined contribution 401(k) plan provided that, under certain circumstances, the company may make matching contributions of up to 50% of the first 6% of a participant’s compensation.
 
The company also has a nonqualified, unfunded Management Savings Plan (MSP) available to key management personnel who are participants in the Management Incentive Plan.  Participants may defer up to 50% of their annual salary and up to 100% of their annual bonus.  The company will make a non-elective contribution each pay period equal to 3% of a participant’s compensation.  Additionally, the company will make matching contributions of 50% of a participant’s pre-tax contribution on the first 5% of the participant’s eligible compensation that is deferred.  Certain employees are also eligible for a transition contribution, and the company may also make discretionary contributions.  All company contributions to the MSP are limited by the amounts contributed by the company to the participant’s 401(k) account.    
 
Sysco’s expense related to its defined contribution plans was $125.4 million in fiscal 2015 , $118.6 million in fiscal 2014 , and $65.3 million in fiscal 2013 .
 
Defined Benefit Plans
 
Sysco maintains a qualified pension plan (Retirement Plan) that pays benefits to participating employees at retirement, using formulas based on a participant’s years of service and compensation.  During fiscal 2012, Sysco approved a plan to freeze future benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2012 for all U.S.-based salaried and non-union hourly employees.  Effective January 1, 2013, these employees were eligible for additional contributions under the company’s defined contribution 401(k) plan. 
 
In addition to receiving benefits upon retirement under the company’s Retirement Plan, certain key management personnel who were participants in the Management Incentive Plan are entitled to receive benefits under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP).  This plan is a nonqualified, unfunded supplementary retirement plan.  In November 2012, Sysco approved a plan to restructure its executive nonqualified retirement program including the SERP.  Future benefit accruals have been frozen under this plan as of June 29, 2013, for all participants.  
 
Also, the company provides certain health care benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents.


70



Funded Status
 
Accumulated pension assets measured against the obligation for pension benefits represents the funded status of a given plan.  The funded status of Sysco’s company-sponsored defined benefit plans is presented in the table below.  The caption “Pension Benefits” in the tables below includes both the Retirement Plan and the SERP.
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other Postretirement Plans
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
3,671,708

 
$
3,089,022

 
$
12,611

 
$
14,248

Service cost
11,263

 
9,657

 
536

 
546

Interest cost
171,120

 
160,436

 
590

 
748

Amendments
914

 
(347
)
 

 

Actuarial (gain) loss, net
(86,129
)
 
492,720

 
(1,050
)
 
(3,280
)
Total disbursements
(89,749
)
 
(79,780
)
 
329

 
349

Benefit obligation at end of year
3,679,127

 
3,671,708

 
13,016

 
12,611

Change in plan assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
2,937,519

 
2,518,009

 

 

Actual return on plan assets
80,225

 
474,538

 

 

Employer contribution
75,133

 
24,752

 
(329
)
 
(349
)
Total disbursements
(89,749
)
 
(79,780
)
 
329

 
349

Fair value of plan assets at end of year
3,003,128

 
2,937,519

 

 

Funded status at end of year
$
(675,999
)
 
$
(734,189
)
 
$
(13,016
)
 
$
(12,611
)
 
In order to meet a portion of its obligations under the SERP, Sysco has contributed to a rabbi trust, COLI policies on the lives of participants and interests in corporate-owned real estate assets.  These assets are not included as plan assets or in the funded status amounts in the tables above and below.   As they are held in a rabbi trust, these assets are available to satisfy the claims of the company’s creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the company.  The life insurance policies on the lives of the participants had carrying values of $97.2 million as of June 27, 2015 and $96.5 million as of June 28, 2014 .  Sysco is the sole owner and beneficiary of such policies.
 
The amounts recognized on Sysco’s consolidated balance sheets related to its company-sponsored defined benefit plans are as follows:
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other Postretirement Plans
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Current accrued benefit liability (Accrued expenses)
$
(27,942
)
 
$
(25,712
)
 
$
(327
)
 
$
(313
)
Non-current accrued benefit liability (Other long-term liabilities)
(648,057
)
 
(708,477
)
 
(12,689
)
 
(12,298
)
Net amount recognized
$
(675,999
)
 
$
(734,189
)
 
$
(13,016
)
 
$
(12,611
)
    
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) as of June 27, 2015 consists of the following amounts that had not, as of that date, been recognized in net benefit cost:
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement Plans
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Prior service cost
$
50,109

 
$
730

 
$
50,839

Actuarial losses (gains)
1,101,051

 
(6,903
)
 
1,094,148

Total
$
1,151,160

 
$
(6,173
)
 
$
1,144,987

 

71



Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) as of June 28, 2014 consists of the following amounts that had not, as of that date, been recognized in net benefit cost:
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement Plans
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Prior service cost
$
60,306

 
$
898

 
$
61,204

Actuarial losses (gains)
1,058,651

 
(6,287
)
 
1,052,364

Total
$
1,118,957

 
$
(5,389
)
 
$
1,113,568

 
The accumulated benefit obligation, which does not consider any salary increases for the remaining active union employees in the Retirement Plan, for the company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans was  $3.7 billion and $3.7 billion as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 , respectively.
 
Information for plans with accumulated benefit obligation/aggregate benefit obligation in excess of fair value of plan assets is as follows:
 
Pension Benefits (1)
 
Other Postretirement Plans
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Accumulated benefit obligation/aggregate benefit obligation
$
3,667,031

 
$
3,660,227

 
$
13,016

 
$
12,611

Fair value of plan assets at end of year
3,003,128

 
2,937,519

 

 

 
(1) Information under Pension Benefits as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 includes both the Retirement Plan and the SERP.
 
Components of Net Benefit Costs and Other Comprehensive Income
 
The components of net company-sponsored pension costs for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
Pension Benefits
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Service cost
$
11,263

 
$
9,657

 
$
70,166

Interest cost
171,120

 
160,436

 
148,561

Expected return on plan assets
(228,624
)
 
(192,795
)
 
(171,201
)
Amortization of prior service cost
11,111

 
11,145

 
9,899

Amortization of actuarial loss
19,871

 
16,327

 
72,624

Curtailment loss

 

 
8,293

Net pension (benefits) costs
$
(15,259
)
 
$
4,770

 
$
138,342


The components of other postretirement benefit costs for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
Other Postretirement Plans
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Service cost
$
536

 
$
546

 
$
541

Interest cost
590

 
748

 
614

Amortization of prior service cost
168

 
168

 
168

Amortization of actuarial gain
(434
)
 
(143
)
 
(203
)
Amortization of transition obligation

 

 
141

Net other postretirement benefit costs
$
860

 
$
1,319

 
$
1,261

 

72



Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) related to company-sponsored pension plans for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
Pension Benefits
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Amortization of prior service cost
$
11,111

 
$
11,145

 
$
18,192

Amortization of actuarial loss
19,871

 
16,327

 
72,624

Prior service cost arising in current year
(914
)
 
347

 
(53,902
)
Actuarial (loss) gain arising in current year
(62,270
)
 
(210,978
)
 
366,957

Net pension costs
$
(32,202
)
 
$
(183,159
)
 
$
403,871

 
Other changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income related to other postretirement plans for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
Other Postretirement Plans
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Amortization of prior service cost
$
168

 
$
168

 
$
168

Amortization of actuarial gain
(434
)
 
(143
)
 
(203
)
Amortization of transition obligation

 

 
141

Actuarial (loss) gain arising in current year
1,050

 
3,280

 
(188
)
Net pension costs
$
784

 
$
3,305

 
$
(82
)

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) as of June 27, 2015 that are expected to be recognized as components of net company-sponsored benefit cost during fiscal 2016 are:
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement Plans
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Amortization of prior service cost
$
11,202

 
$
169

 
$
11,371

Amortization of actuarial losses (gains)
22,186

 
(481
)
 
21,705

Total
$
33,388

 
$
(312
)
 
$
33,076

 
Employer Contributions
 
The company made cash contributions to its company-sponsored pension plans of $75.1 million and $24.8 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively.  There were no required contributions to the Retirement Plan to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements in fiscal 2015 .  The $50 million contribution to the Retirement Plan in fiscal 2015 was voluntary, as there were no required contributions to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements in fiscal 2015 .  There are no required contributions to the Retirement Plan to meet ERISA minimum funding requirements in fiscal 2016 .  The company’s contributions to the SERP and other post-retirement plans are made in the amounts needed to fund current year benefit payments.  The estimated fiscal 2016 contributions to fund benefit payments for the SERP and other postretirement plans are $27.9 million and $0.3 million , respectively.


73



Estimated Future Benefit Payments
 
Estimated future benefit payments for vested participants, based on actuarial assumptions, are as follows:
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other
Postretirement Plans
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
105,555

 
$
327

2017
115,844

 
546

2018
126,413

 
824

2019
137,300

 
1,035

2020
148,517

 
1,213

Subsequent five years
906,784

 
6,658

 
Assumptions
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of year-end were:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
Discount rate — Retirement Plan
4.84
%
 
4.74
%
Discount rate — SERP
4.63

 
4.59

Discount rate — Other Postretirement Plans
4.84

 
4.74

Rate of compensation increase — Retirement Plan
3.89

 
3.89

 
  As benefit accruals under the SERP were frozen as of June 29, 2013, due to the plan freeze discussed above, future pay is not projected in the determination of the benefit obligation as of June 27, 2015 or June 28, 2014.
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net company-sponsored pension costs and other postretirement benefit costs for each fiscal year were:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Discount rate — Retirement Plan
4.74
%
 
5.32
%
 
 
4.81
%
 
Discount rate — SERP
4.59
%
 
4.94
%
 
 
3.96
%
(1)
Discount rate — Other Postretirement Plans
4.74
%
 
5.32
%
 
 
4.81
%
 
Expected rate of return — Retirement Plan
7.75
%
 
7.75
%
 
 
7.75
%
 
Rate of compensation increase — Retirement Plan
3.89
%
 
3.89
%
 
 
5.30
%
 
 
(1) The SERP was remeasured in November 2012 as a result of the plan freeze discussed above.  The rate in the table above reflects the discount rate as of this remeasurement.

   As benefit accruals under the SERP were frozen as of June 29, 2013, due to the plan freeze discussed above, future pay is not projected in the determination of net pension costs related to the SERP for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.  For determining the net pension costs related to the SERP for fiscal 2013, the SERP calculations utilized an age-graded salary growth assumption.
 
A healthcare cost trend rate is not used in the calculations of postretirement benefit obligations because Sysco subsidizes the cost of postretirement medical coverage by a fixed dollar amount, with the retiree responsible for the cost of coverage in excess of the subsidy, including all future cost increases.
 
For guidance in determining the discount rate, Sysco calculates the implied rate of return on a hypothetical portfolio of high-quality fixed-income investments for which the timing and amount of cash outflows approximates the estimated payouts of the company-sponsored pension plans.  The discount rate assumption is updated annually and revised as deemed appropriate.  The discount rate to be used for the calculation of fiscal 2016 net company-sponsored benefit costs for the Retirement Plan is  4.84% .  The discount rate to be used for the calculation of fiscal 2016 net company-sponsored benefit costs for the SERP is 4.63% .  The discount rate to be used for the calculation of fiscal 2016 net company-sponsored benefit costs for the Other Postretirement Plans is 4.84% .
 

74



The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption is net return on assets assumption, representing gross return on assets less plan expenses.  The expected return is derived from a mathematical asset model that incorporates assumptions as to the various asset class returns, reflecting a combination of rigorous historical performance analysis and the forward-looking views of the financial markets regarding the yield on bonds, the historical returns of the major stock markets and returns on alternative investments. The rate of return assumption is reviewed annually and revised as deemed appropriate.  The expected long-term rate of return to be used in the calculation of fiscal 2016 net company-sponsored benefit costs for the Retirement Plan is 7.25% .
 
Plan Assets
 
Investment Strategy    
 
The company’s overall strategic investment objectives for the Retirement Plan are to preserve capital for future benefit payments and to balance risk and return commensurate with ongoing changes in the valuation of plan liabilities.  Over time, the company intends to decrease the risk of the Retirement Plan’s investments in order to preserve the Retirement Plan’s funded status.  In order to accomplish these objectives, the company oversees the Retirement Plan’s investment objectives and policy design, decides proper plan asset class strategies and structures, monitors the performance of plan investment managers and investment funds and determines the proper investment allocation of pension plan contributions and withdrawals.  The company has created an investment structure for the Retirement Plan that takes into account the nature of the Retirement Plan’s liabilities.  This structure ensures the Retirement Plan’s investments are diversified within each asset class, in addition to being diversified across asset classes with the intent to build asset class portfolios that are structured without strategic bias for or against any subcategories within each asset class.  The company has also created a set of investment guidelines for the Retirement Plan’s investment managers to specify prohibited transactions, including borrowing of money except for real estate, private equity or hedge fund portfolios where leverage is a key component of the investment strategy and permitted in the investments’ governing documents, the purchase of securities on margin unless fully collateralized by cash or cash equivalents or short sales, pledging, mortgaging or hypothecating of any securities, except for loans of securities that are fully collateralized, market timing transactions and the direct purchase of the securities of Sysco or the investment manager.  The purchase or sale of derivatives for speculation or leverage is also prohibited; however, investment managers are allowed to use derivative securities so long as they do not increase the risk profile or leverage of the manager’s portfolio. 
 
The company’s target and actual investment allocation as of June 27, 2015 is as follows:
 
Target Asset Allocation
 
Actual Asset Allocation
U.S. equity
24
%
 
24
%
International equity
24

 
25

Long duration fixed income
27

 
26

High yield fixed income
7

 
7

Alternative investments
18

 
18

 
 
 
100
%
 
Sysco’s investment strategy is implemented through a combination of balanced and specialized investment managers, passive investment funds and actively-managed investment funds.  U.S. equity consists of both large-cap and small-to-mid-cap securities.  Long duration fixed income investments include U.S. government and agency securities, corporate bonds from diversified industries, asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities, other debt securities and derivative securities.  High yield fixed income consists of below investment grade corporate debt securities and may include derivative securities.  Alternative investments may include private equity, private real estate, hedge funds, timberland, and commodities investments.  Investment funds are selected based on each fund’s stated investment strategy to align with Sysco’s overall target mix of investments.  Actual asset allocation is regularly reviewed and periodically rebalanced to the target allocation when considered appropriate. 

As discussed above, the Retirement Plan’s investments in equity, fixed income and alternative investments provide a range of returns and also expose the plan to investment risk.  However, the investment policies put in place by the company require diversification of plan assets across issuers, industries and countries.  As such, the Retirement Plan does not have significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. 
 

75



Fair Value of Plan Assets
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. an exit price).  See Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements,” for a description of the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities held by Sysco's Retirement Plan measured at fair value.
 
Cash and cash equivalents: Valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these investments.  Cash and cash equivalents is included as a Level 2 measurement in the table below.

Equity securities: Valued at the closing price reported on the exchange market.  If a stock is not listed on a public exchange, such as an American Depository Receipt or some preferred stocks, the stock is valued using an evaluated bid price based on a compilation of observable market information.  Inputs used include yields, the underlying security “best price”, adjustments for corporate actions and exchange prices of underlying and common stock of the same issuer.  Equity securities valued at the closing price reported on the exchange market are classified as a Level 1 measurement in the table below; all other equity securities are included as a Level 2 measurement.
 
Fixed income securities: Valued using evaluated bid prices based on a compilation of observable market information or a broker quote in a non-active market.  Inputs used vary by type of security, but include spreads, yields, rate benchmarks, rate of prepayment, cash flows, rating changes and collateral performance and type.  All fixed income securities are included as a Level 2 measurement in the table below.
 
Investment funds: Funds holding debt, equity and exchange-traded real estate securities are valued at the net asset value (NAV) provided by the manager of each fund.  The NAV is calculated as the underlying net assets owned by the fund, divided by the number of shares outstanding.  The NAV is based on the fair value of the underlying securities within the fund.  Non-exchange traded real estate funds are valued based on the proportionate interest held by the Retirement Plan, which is based on the valuations of the underlying real estate investments held by each fund.  Each real estate investment is valued on the basis of a discounted cash flow approach.  Inputs used include future rental receipts, expenses and residual values from a market participant view of the highest and best use of the real estate as rental property.  The private equity funds are valued based on the proportionate interest held by the Retirement Plan, which is based on the valuations of the underlying private equity investments held by each fund.  The hedge funds are valued based on the hedge funds' proportionate share of the net assets of the underlying private investment fund as determined by the underlying private investment fund's general partner. Indirectly-held investments are valued utilizing the latest financial reports supplied by the fund’s portfolio investments.  Directly-held investments are valued initially based on transaction price and are adjusted utilizing available market data and investment-specific factors, such as estimates of liquidation value, prices of recent transactions in the same or similar issuer, current operating performance and future expectations of the particular investment, changes in market outlook and the financing environment.  Investment funds holding debt, equity and exchange traded real-estate securities are included as a Level 2 measurement in the table below.  The non-exchange traded real estate funds, hedge funds and private equity funds are included as Level 3 measurements.    
 
Derivatives:  Valuation method varies by type of derivative security.
 
Credit default and interest rate swaps:  Valued using evaluated bid prices based on a compilation of observable market information.  Inputs used for credit default swaps include spread curves and trade data about the credit quality of the counterparty.  Inputs used for interest rate swaps include benchmark yields, swap curves, cash flow analysis, and interdealer broker rates.  Credit default and interest rate swaps are included as a Level 2 measurement in the table below.
Foreign currency contracts: Valued using a standardized interpolation model that utilizes the quoted prices for standard-length forward foreign currency contracts and adjusts to the remaining term outstanding on the contract being valued.  Foreign currency contracts are included as a Level 2 measurement in the table below.
Futures and option contracts: Valued at the closing price reported on the exchange market for exchange-traded futures and options.  Over-the-counter options are valued using pricing models that are based on observable market information.  Exchange-traded futures and options are included as a Level 1 measurement in the table below; over-the-counter options are included as a Level 2 measurement.


76



The following table presents the fair value of the Retirement Plan’s assets by major asset category as of June 27, 2015 :
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of June 27, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
$

 
$
21,968

 
$

 
$
21,968

U.S. equity:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. large-cap (1)
233,525

 
333,709

 

 
$
567,234

U.S. small-cap
154,598

 

 

 
154,598

International equity   (2)

 
732,595

 

 
$
732,595

Long duration fixed income:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate bonds

 
567,280

 

 
$
567,280

U.S. government and agency securities

 
190,125

 

 
190,125

Other

 
4,343

 

 
4,343

Derivatives, net (3)

 
1,078

 

 
$
1,078

High yield fixed income   (2)

 
204,175

 

 
204,175

Alternative investments:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Hedge Fund (2)

 


 
335,265

 
335,265

Real estate (2)

 
25,386

 
138,283

 
163,669

Private equity (2)

 

 
52,891

 
$
52,891

Total investments at fair value
$
388,123

 
$
2,080,659

 
$
526,439

 
$
2,995,221

Other (4)
 

 
 

 
 

 
7,907

Fair value of plan assets at end of year
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
3,003,128

 
(1)  Include direct investments and investment funds.
(2)  Include investments in investment funds only.
(3)  Include credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and futures.  The fair value of asset positions totaled $1.4 million ; the fair
value of liability positions totaled $0.3 million .
(4)  Include primarily plan receivables and payables, net.


77



The following table presents the fair value of the Retirement Plan’s assets by major asset category as of June 28, 2014 :
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of June 28, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
$

 
$
51,066

 
$

 
$
51,066

U.S. equity:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. large-cap (1)
218,165

 
777,627

 

 
995,792

U.S. small-cap
135,781

 

 

 
135,781

International equity   (2)

 
717,022

 

 
717,022

Long duration fixed income:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate bonds

 
568,419

 

 
568,419

U.S. government and agency securities

 
171,617

 

 
171,617

Other

 
4,907

 

 
4,907

Derivatives, net (3)
(127
)
 
352

 

 
225

High yield fixed income   (2)

 
102,041

 

 
102,041

Alternative investments:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate (2)

 
114,250

 
35,403

 
149,653

Private equity (2)

 

 
31,204

 
31,204

Total investments at fair value
$
353,819

 
$
2,507,301

 
$
66,607

 
$
2,927,727

Other (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,792

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,937,519


(1)   Include direct investments and investment funds.
(2)  Include investments in investment funds only.
(3)   Include credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and futures.
  The fair value of asset positions totaled $0.8 million ; the fair value of liability positions totaled $0.6 million .
(4)  Include primarily plan receivables and payables, net.
 
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Retirement Plan’s Level 3 assets for each fiscal year:

 
Real Estate
Funds

Private Equity Funds

Hedge Funds

Total Level 3 Measurements
 
(In thousands)
Balance, June 29, 2013
$
64,845


$
14,375


$


$
79,220

Actual return on plan assets:
 


 


 




Relating to assets still held at the reporting date
3,044


1,931




4,975

Relating to assets sold during the period
3,307


1,767




5,074

Purchases and sales, net
(35,793
)

13,131




(22,662
)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3







Balance, June 28, 2014
$
35,403


$
31,204


$


$
66,607

Actual return on plan assets:











Relating to assets still held at the reporting date
8,122


2,438


12,265


22,825

Relating to assets sold during the period
1,062


1,780




2,842

Purchases and sales, net
93,696


17,469


323,000


434,165

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3







Balance, June 27, 2015
$
138,283


$
52,891


$
335,265


$
526,439


78





15.  MULTIEMPLOYER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
Sysco contributes to several multiemployer defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and Canada based on obligations arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.  Sysco does not directly manage these multiemployer plans, which are generally managed by boards of trustees, half of whom are appointed by the unions and the other half appointed by Sysco and the other employers contributing to the plan.  Approximately 10% of Sysco’s current employees are participants in such multiemployer plans as of June 27, 2015
 
The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects: 
Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
If Sysco chooses to stop participating in some of its multiemployer plans, Sysco may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
 
Based upon the information available from plan administrators, management believes that several of these multiemployer plans are underfunded.  In addition, pension-related legislation in the U.S. requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the level of their underfunding.  As a result, Sysco expects its contributions to these plans to increase in the future.  In addition, if a U.S. multiemployer defined benefit plan fails to satisfy certain minimum funding requirements, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may impose a nondeductible excise tax of 5% on the amount of the accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to the fund. 
 
Withdrawal Activity
 
Sysco has voluntarily withdrawn from various multiemployer pension plans.  There were no withdrawal liability provisions recorded in fiscal 2015 , $1.5 million in fiscal 2014 and $41.9 million in fiscal 2013 . As of June 27, 2015 , Sysco had no liabilities recorded related to certain multiemployer defined benefit plans for which Sysco’s voluntary withdrawal had already occurred and had $1.4 million liabilities as of June 28, 2014 . Recorded withdrawal liabilities are estimated at the time of withdrawal based on the most recently available valuation and participant data for the respective plans; amounts are subsequently adjusted to the period of payment to reflect any changes to these estimates.  If any of these plans were to undergo a mass withdrawal, as defined by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, within the two plan years following the plan year in which we completely withdraw from that plan, Sysco could have additional liability.  The company does not currently believe any mass withdrawals are probable to occur in the applicable two -plan year time frame relating to the plans from which Sysco has voluntarily withdrawn.
 
Potential Withdrawal Liability
 
Under current law regarding multiemployer defined benefit plans, a plan’s termination, Sysco’s voluntary withdrawal, or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any underfunded multiemployer defined benefit plan would require Sysco to make payments to the plan for Sysco’s proportionate share of the multiemployer plan’s unfunded vested liabilities.  Generally, Sysco does not have the greatest share of liability among the participants in any of the plans in which it participates.  Sysco believes that one of the above-mentioned events is reasonably possible for certain plans in which it participates and estimates its share of withdrawal liability for these plans could have been as much as $90.0 million as of June 27, 2015 .  This estimate excludes plans for which Sysco has recorded withdrawal liabilities or where the likelihood of the above-mentioned events is deemed remote.  This estimate is based on the information available from plan administrators, which had a valuation date of December 31, 2013 for a majority of the plans.  As the valuation date for all of these plans was December 31, 2013, the company’s estimate reflects the condition of the financial markets as of that date.  Due to the lack of current information, management believes Sysco’s current share of the withdrawal liability could materially differ from this estimate.
 

79



Plan Contributions
 
Sysco’s contributions to multiemployer defined benefit pension plans were as follows for each fiscal year:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Individually significant plans
$
32,097

 
$
30,402

 
$
28,816

All other plans
6,047

 
45,627

 
36,923

Total contributions
$
38,144

 
$
76,029

 
$
65,739


Payments for voluntary withdrawals included in contributions were $1.4 million , $40.8 million and $31.8 million in fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  
 
Individually Significant Plans
 
The information in the following tables relate to multiemployer defined benefit pension plans which Sysco has determined to be individually significant to the company.  To determine individually significant plans, the company evaluated several factors, including Sysco’s significance to the plan in terms of employees and contributions, the funded status of the plan and the size of company’s potential withdrawal liability if it were to voluntarily withdraw from the plan.
 
The following table provides information about the funded status of individually significant plans: 
The “EIN-PN” column provides the Employer Identification Number (EIN) and the three-digit plan number (PN). 
The “Pension Protection Act Zone Status” columns provide the two most recent Pension Protection Act zone statuses available from each plan.  The zone status is based on information that the company received from the plan’s administrators and is certified by each plan’s actuary.  Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded, plans in the orange zone are both less than 80% funded and have an accumulated funding deficiency or are expected to have a deficiency in any of the next six plan years, plans in the yellow zone are less than 80% funded and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. 
The “FIP/RP Status” column indicates whether a financial improvement plan (FIP) for yellow/orange zone plans or a rehabilitation plan (RP) for red zone plans is pending or implemented in the current year or was put in place in a prior year.  A status of “Pending” indicates a FIP/RP has been approved but actual period covered by the FIP/RP has not begun.  A status of “Implemented” means the period covered by the FIP/RP began in the current year or is ongoing. 
The “Surcharge Imposed” column indicates whether a surcharge was paid during the most recent annual period presented for the company’s contributions to each plan in the red zone.  If the company’s current collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with a plan satisfies the requirements of a pending but not yet implemented RP, then the payment of surcharges is not required and “No” will be reflected in this column.  If the company’s current collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with a plan does not yet satisfy the requirements of a pending but not yet implemented RP, then the payment of surcharges is required and “Yes” will be reflected in this column.

80



 
 
 
 
Pension Protection Act
Zone Status
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pension Fund
 
EIN-PN
 
As of
12/31/15
 
As of
12/31/14
 
FIP/RP
Status
 
Surcharge
Imposed
 
Expiration
Date(s)
of CBA(s)
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
 
91-6145047-001
 
Green
 
Green
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
4/26/14 to 11/7/20 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity
 
23-1511735-001
 
Yellow
 
Yellow
 
Implemented
 
N/A
 
7/31/16 to 7/20/20 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York State Teamsters
Conference Pension and
Retirement Fund
 
16-6063585-074
 
Red
 
Red
 
Implemented
 
No
 
4/30/2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 355 Retirement Pension
Fund
 
52-6043608-001
 
Yellow
 
Yellow
 
Implemented
 
N/A
 
8/31/2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minneapolis Food Distributing Industry Pension Plan
 
41-6047047-001
 
Green
 
Green
 
Implemented
 
N/A
 
8/8/2017
 
(1)
Sysco is party to 23 CBAs that require contributions to the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust.  Each agreement covers anywhere from less than 1% to 10% of the total contributions Sysco is required to pay the fund.
(2)
Sysco is party to three CBAs that require contributions to the Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity. One agreement expires July 31, 2016 and covers approximately 5% of the total Contribution Sysco is required to pay the fund.  The remaining two agreements expire July 20, 2020 and cover the remaining 95% of the total contributions Sysco is required to pay the fund.

The following table provides information about the company’s contributions to individually significant plans: 
 
The “ Sysco Contributions ” columns provide contribution amounts based on Sysco’s fiscal years, which may not coincide with the plans’ fiscal years. 

The“ Sysco 5% of Total Plan Contributions ” columns indicate whether Sysco was listed in the plan’s most recently filed Form 5500s as providing more than five percent of the total contributions to the plan, and the plan year-end is noted.   
 
 
Sysco Contributions
 
Sysco 5% of
Total Plan Contributions
Pension Fund
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Year Ending
12/31/13
 
Year Ending
12/31/12
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
 
$
23,268

 
$
21,893

 
$
20,561

 
No
 
No
Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of
Philadelphia and Vicinity
 
2,233

 
1,977

 
2,256

 
No
 
No
N.Y. State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund
 
1,455

 
1,444

 
1,399

 
No
 
No
Truck Drivers and Helpers Local
Union No. 355 Retirement Pension
Fund
 
2,068

 
1,874

 
1,624

 
Yes
 
Yes
Minneapolis Food Distributing
Industry Pension Plan
 
3,073

 
3,214

 
2,976

 
Yes
 
Yes
 
For all of the plans noted in the table above, minimum contributions outside of the agreed upon contractual rate are not required.
 

81



Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
 
In addition to the contributions to the defined benefit pension plans described above, Sysco also contributes to several multiemployer plans that provide other postretirement benefits based on obligations arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.  These plans may provide medical, pharmacy, dental, vision, mental health and other benefits to active employees and retirees as determined by the trustees of each plan.  Sysco contributed to these plans $28.5 million in fiscal 2015 , $29.7 million in fiscal 2014 and $30.6 million in fiscal 2013 .  There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of fiscal 2015 , fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 contributions.
16.  EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
Basic earnings per share has been computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for each respective year.  Diluted earnings per share has been computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during those respective years adjusted for the dilutive effect of share-based awards outstanding using the treasury stock method.    
 
A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the periods presented follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings
$
686,773

 
$
931,533

 
$
992,427

Denominator:
 

 
 

 
 

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
592,072,308

 
585,988,084

 
589,397,807

Dilutive effect of share-based awards
4,776,726

 
4,228,136

 
3,277,303

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding
596,849,034

 
590,216,220

 
592,675,110

 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
$
1.16

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.68

 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share:
$
1.15

 
$
1.58

 
$
1.67

 
The number of options that were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive was approximately 2,400,000 , 2,100,000 and 18,200,000 for fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
 
Dividends declared were $705.5 million , $673.6 million and $654.9 million in fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  Included in dividends declared for each year were dividends declared but not yet paid at year-end of approximately $178.3 million , $171.6 million and $165.8 million in fiscal 2015 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
17. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
Comprehensive income is net earnings plus certain other items that are recorded directly to shareholders’ equity, such as foreign currency translation adjustments, amounts related to cash flow hedging arrangements and certain amounts related to pension and other postretirement plans.  Comprehensive income was $406.2 million , $735.8 million and $1.2 billion in fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.    


82



A summary of the components of other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects for each of the years presented is as follows:
 
 
 
2015
 
Location of Expense
(Income) Recognized
in Net Earnings
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax
 
Net of Tax Amount
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
Operating expenses
 
$
11,279

 
$
4,331

 
$
6,948

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain), net
Operating expenses
 
19,437

 
7,464

 
11,973

Total reclassification adjustments
 
 
30,716

 
11,795

 
18,921

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Prior service cost arising in current year
N/A
 
(914
)
 
(351
)
 
(563
)
Net actuarial gain arising in current year
N/A
 
(61,221
)
 
(23,509
)
 
(37,712
)
Total other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
 
 
(62,135
)
 
(23,860
)
 
(38,275
)
Foreign currency translation:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustment
N/A
 
(232,185
)
 

 
(232,185
)
Interest rate swaps:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Amortization of cash flow hedges
Interest expense
 
8,305

 
3,189

 
5,116

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges
N/A
 
(55,374
)
 
(21,263
)
 
(34,111
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
$
(310,673
)
 
$
(30,139
)
 
$
(280,534
)

83



 
 
 
2014
 
Location of Expense
(Income) Recognized
in Net Earnings
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax
 
Net of Tax Amount
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
Operating expenses
 
$
11,313

 
$
4,343

 
$
6,970

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain), net
Operating expenses
 
16,184

 
6,216

 
9,968

Total reclassification adjustments
 
 
27,497

 
10,559

 
16,938

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Prior service cost arising in current year
N/A
 
347

 
133

 
214

Net actuarial gain arising in current year
N/A
 
(207,698
)
 
(79,756
)
 
(127,942
)
Total other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
 
 
(207,351
)
 
(79,623
)
 
(127,728
)
Foreign currency translation:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustment
N/A
 
(3,106
)
 

 
(3,106
)
Interest rate swaps:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of cash flow hedges
Interest expense
 
625

 
240

 
385

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges
N/A
 
(133,466
)
 
(51,251
)
 
(82,215
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
$
(315,801
)
 
$
(120,075
)
 
$
(195,726
)

84



 
 
 
2013
 
Location of Expense
(Income) Recognized
in Net Earnings
 
Before Tax Amount
 
Tax
 
Net of Tax Amount
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
Operating expenses
 
$
18,360

 
$
7,050

 
$
11,310

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain), net
Operating expenses
 
72,421

 
27,811

 
44,610

Amortization of transition obligation
Operating expenses
 
141

 
53

 
88

Total reclassification adjustments
 
 
90,922

 
34,914

 
56,008

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Prior service cost arising in current year
N/A
 
(53,902
)
 
(20,699
)
 
(33,203
)
Net actuarial gain arising in current year
N/A
 
366,769

 
140,840

 
225,929

Total other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
 
 
312,867

 
120,141

 
192,726

Foreign currency translation:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustment
N/A
 
(33,191
)
 

 
(33,191
)
Interest rate swaps:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Reclassification adjustments:
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Amortization of cash flow hedges
Interest expense
 
626

 
240

 
386

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
$
371,224

 
$
155,295

 
$
215,929

 
The following table provides a summary of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the years presented:
 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans,
net of tax
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
Interest Rate Swap,
net of tax
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Balance as of June 30, 2012
$
(823,901
)
 
$
170,749

 
$
(9,714
)
 
$
(662,866
)
Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
192,726

 
(33,191
)
 

 
159,535

Amounts reclassified from accumulated
    other comprehensive loss
56,008

 

 
386

 
56,394

Balance as of June 29, 2013
(575,167
)
 
137,558

 
(9,328
)
 
(446,937
)
Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
(127,728
)
 
(3,106
)
 
(82,215
)
 
(213,049
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
    other comprehensive loss
16,938

 

 
385

 
17,323

Balance as of June 28, 2014
(685,957
)
 
134,452

 
(91,158
)
 
(642,663
)
Other comprehensive income before
    reclassification adjustments
(38,275
)
 
(232,185
)
 
(34,111
)
 
(304,571
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
    other comprehensive loss
18,921

 

 
5,116

 
24,037

Balance as of June 27, 2015
$
(705,311
)
 
$
(97,733
)
 
$
(120,153
)
 
$
(923,197
)

85



18. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
 
Sysco provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors under several share-based payment arrangements including various employee stock option plans, a non-employee director plan and the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan.
 
Stock Incentive Plans
 
In November 2013, Sysco’s Long-term Incentive Plan (2013 Plan) was adopted and reserved up to 55,600,000 shares of Sysco common stock for share-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and key advisors.  Of the 55,600,000 authorized shares, the full 55,600,000 shares may be issued as options or stock appreciation rights and up to 17,500,000 shares may be issued as restricted stock, restricted stock units or other types of stock-based awards.  To date, Sysco has issued options and restricted stock units under this plan.  Vesting requirements for awards under this plan will vary by individual grant and may include either time-based vesting or time-based vesting subject to acceleration based on performance criteria for fiscal periods of at least one year.  The contractual life of all options granted under this plan will be no greater than ten years.  As of June 27, 2015 , there were 43,562,619 remaining shares authorized and available for grant in total under the 2013 Plan, of which the full 43,562,619 shares may be issued as options or stock appreciation rights, or as a combination of up to 15,115,359 shares that may be issued as restricted stock, restricted stock units or other types of stock-based awards, with the remainder available for issuance as options or stock appreciation rights. 
 
Sysco has also granted employee options under several previous employee stock option plans for which previously granted options remain outstanding as of June 27, 2015 .  No new options will be issued under any of the prior plans, as future grants to employees will be made through the 2013 Plan or subsequently adopted plans.  Awards under these plans are subject to time-based vesting with vesting periods that vary by individual grant.  The contractual life of all options granted under these plans is seven years.
 
In November 2009, Sysco’s 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan was adopted and provides for the issuance of up to 750,000 shares of Sysco common stock for share-based awards to non-employee directors.  The authorized shares may be granted as restricted stock, restricted stock units, elected shares or additional shares.  Vesting requirements for awards under these plans vary by individual grant and include either time-based vesting or vesting based on performance criteria.  As of June 27, 2015 , there were a total of 346,286 remaining shares authorized and available for grant under the 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan.
 
Stock Options
 
Sysco’s option awards are subject to graded vesting over a service period.  Sysco recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
 
In addition, certain of Sysco’s options provide that the options continue to vest as if the optionee continued to be an employee or director if the optionee meets certain age and years of service thresholds upon retirement.  In these cases, Sysco will recognize compensation cost for such awards over the period from the grant date to the date the employee or director first becomes eligible to retire with the options continuing to vest after retirement.
 
The fair value of each option award is estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The weighted average assumptions for the periods indicated are noted in the following table.  Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of Sysco’s stock, implied volatilities from traded options on Sysco’s stock and other factors.  Sysco utilizes historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes.  Expected dividend yield is estimated based on the historical pattern of dividends and the average stock price for the year preceding the option grant.  The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
 
The following weighted-average assumptions were used for each fiscal year presented:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Dividend yield
3.2
%
 
3.5
%
 
3.7
%
Expected volatility
20.7
%
 
20.4
%
 
20.7
%
Risk-free interest rate
2.0
%
 
2.1
%
 
0.7
%
Expected life
7.3 years

 
7.2 years

 
5.4 years



86



The following summary presents information regarding outstanding options as of June 27, 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended with regard to options under all stock incentive plans:
 
Shares Under Option
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding as of June 28, 2014
27,469,911

 
$
29.59

 

 

Granted
4,497,954

 
38.89

 

 

Exercised
(6,054,528
)
 
29.31

 

 

Forfeited
(85,550
)
 
29.33

 

 

Expired
(35,409
)
 
33.22

 

 

Outstanding as of June 27, 2015
25,792,378

 
$
31.28

 
5.21
 
$
185,242

Vested or expected to vest as of June 27, 2015
25,575,542

 
$
31.24

 
5.18
 
$
184,526

Exercisable as of June 27, 2015
9,902,719

 
$
28.54

 
3.05
 
$
97,362

 
The total number of employee options granted was 4,497,954 , 5,575,645 and 6,212,716 in fiscal years 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  During fiscal 2015 , 1,286,533 options were granted to 6 executive officers and 3,211,421 options were granted to approximately 173 other key employees.  During fiscal 2014 , 2,159,698 options were granted to 11 executive officers and 3,415,947 options were granted to approximately 167 other key employees.  During fiscal 2013 , 2,351,720 options were granted to 11 executive officers and 3,860,996 options were granted to approximately 152 other key employees.
 
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted in fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $5.78 , $4.64 and $3.20 , respectively.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $21.6 million , $19.1 million and $24.1 million , respectively.
 
Restricted Stock Units
 
During fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , 1,198,588 , 1,322,709 and 1,722,835 restricted stock units, respectively, were granted to employees, the majority of which will vest ratably over a three -year period.  Some of these restricted stock units were granted with dividend equivalents.  The fair value of each restricted stock unit award granted with a dividend equivalent is based on the company’s stock price as of the date of grant.  For restricted stock unit awards granted without dividend equivalents, the fair value was reduced by the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period.  The weighted average grant-date fair value per share of restricted stock units granted during  fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $37.59 , $33.39 and $29.75 , respectively.  The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $52.5 million , $39.4 million and $27.6 million , respectively. 
 
Non-Employee Director Awards
 
During fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , 37,035 , 43,119 and 48,069 shares, respectively, of restricted awards were granted to non-employee directors that will vest over a one -year period.  Non-employee directors may elect to receive these awards in restricted stock shares that will vest at the end of the award stated vesting period or as deferred units which convert into shares of Sysco common stock upon a date selected by the non-employee director that is subsequent to the award stated vesting date.  The fair value of the restricted awards is based on the company’s stock price as of the date of grant.  The weighted average grant-date fair value of the shares granted during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $38.89 , $33.40 and $29.96 , respectively.  The total fair value of restricted stock shares vested and deferred units distributed during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $1.6 million , $1.4 million and $1.9 million , respectively.  Restricted stock shares are valued on their vesting date.  Vested deferred units are valued on their subsequent conversion and distribution date.
 
Non-employee directors may elect to receive up to 100% of their annual directors’ fees in Sysco common stock on either an annual or deferred basis.  Sysco provides a matching grant of 50% of the number of shares received for the stock election subject to certain limitations.  As a result of such elections, a total of 23,949 24,565 and 26,702 shares with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $38.26 , $34.59 and $30.38 per share were issued in fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively, in the form of fully vested common stock or deferred units.  The total fair value of common stock issued as a result of election shares and deferred units distributed during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was $0.9 million , $0.8 million and $0.5 million , respectively.  Common stock shares are valued on their vesting date.  Vested deferred units are valued on their subsequent conversion and distribution date.
 

87



As of June 27, 2015 , there were 104,605 fully vested deferred units outstanding that will convert into shares of Sysco common stock upon dates selected by the respective non-employee directors.

Summary of Non-vested Awards
 
The following summary presents information regarding outstanding non-vested awards as of June 27, 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended with regard to these awards under the stock incentive plans.  Award types represented include:  restricted stock units granted to employees and restricted awards granted to non-employee directors.
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested as of June 28, 2014
2,918,405

 
$
31.06

Granted
1,235,940

 
37.63

Vested
(1,396,269
)
 
30.40

Forfeited
(60,422
)
 
32.90

Nonvested as of June 27, 2015
2,697,654

 
$
34.37

 
Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan
 
Sysco has an Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan that permits employees to invest in Sysco common stock by means of periodic payroll deductions at a discount of 15% from the closing price on the last business day of each calendar quarter.  The total number of shares which may be sold pursuant to the plan may not exceed 79,000,000 shares, of which 1,211,657 remained available as of June 27, 2015 .
 
During fiscal 2015 , 1,243,275 shares of Sysco common stock were purchased by the participants, as compared to 1,315,535 shares purchased in fiscal 2014 and 1,470,271 shares purchased in fiscal 2013 .  The weighted average fair value of employee stock purchase rights issued pursuant to the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan was $5.73 , $5.17 and $4.78 per share during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The fair value of the stock purchase rights was calculated as the difference between the stock price at date of issuance and the employee purchase price.
 
 
All Share-Based Payment Arrangements
 
The total share-based compensation cost that has been recognized in results of operations was $73.8 million , $74.3 million and $70.1 million for fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and is included within operating expenses in the consolidated results of operations.  The total income tax benefit recognized in results of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $27.4 million , $28.1 million and $29.9 million for fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
 
As of June 27, 2015 , there was $69.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation arrangements.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.42 years .
 
Cash received from option exercises and purchases of shares under the Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan was $240.2 million , $255.6 million and $628.7 million during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.  The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $20.7 million , $16.6 million and $24.0 million during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
19.   INCOME TAXES
 
Income Tax Provisions
 
For financial reporting purposes, earnings before income taxes consists of the following:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
U.S.
$
818,244

 
$
1,287,371

 
$
1,351,947

Foreign
189,903

 
188,253

 
195,508

Total
$
1,008,147

 
$
1,475,624

 
$
1,547,455



88



The income tax provision / (benefit) for each fiscal year consists of the following:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
U.S. federal income taxes
$
285,807

 
$
433,795

 
$
439,667

State and local income taxes
(2,737
)
 
55,736

 
69,759

Foreign income taxes
38,304

 
54,560

 
45,602

Total
$
321,374

 
$
544,091

 
$
555,028

 
The current and deferred components of the income tax provisions for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Current
$
327,639

 
$
574,760

 
$
582,889

Deferred
(6,265
)
 
(30,669
)
 
(27,861
)
Total
$
321,374

 
$
544,091

 
$
555,028

 
The deferred tax provisions result from the effects of net changes during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities arising from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
 
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
 
Significant components of Sysco’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
 
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
Excess tax depreciation and basis differences of assets
$
381,875

 
$
416,417

Goodwill and intangible assets
224,943

 
211,434

Other
23,449

 
15,171

Total deferred tax liabilities
630,267

 
643,022

Deferred tax assets:
 

 
 

Net operating tax state loss carryforwards
47,958

 
20,123

Benefit on unrecognized tax benefits
16,270

 
22,170

Pension
264,780

 
287,046

Share-based compensation
42,569

 
41,262

Deferred compensation
35,573

 
33,280

Self-insured liabilities
65,617

 
65,002

Receivables
38,410

 
47,688

Inventory
68,186

 
62,799

Cash flow hedge
74,900

 
56,826

Other
29,667

 
26,471

Total deferred tax assets
683,930

 
662,667

Total net deferred tax (assets)
$
(53,663
)
 
$
(19,645
)
 
The company’s net operating tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 consisted primarily of state net operating tax loss carryforwards.  The state net operating tax loss carryforwards outstanding as of June 27, 2015 expire in fiscal years 2017 through 2035.  There were no valuation allowances recorded for the state tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 because management believes it is more likely than not that these benefits will be realized based on utilization forecasts.  


89



Effective Tax Rates
 
Reconciliations of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rates for each fiscal year are as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate
35.00
 %
 
35.00
 %
 
35.00
 %
State and local income taxes, net of any
applicable federal income tax benefit
0.91

 
2.82

 
2.59

Foreign tax rate differential
(2.84
)
 
(1.66
)
 
(1.22
)
Other
(1.19
)
 
0.71

 
(0.50
)
 
31.88
 %
 
36.87
 %
 
35.87
 %
 
The effective tax rate of 31.9% for fiscal 2015 was favorably impacted by lower earnings in the U.S. primarily due to costs associated with the termination of the US Foods proposed merger. The lower U.S. earnings resulted in a more significant favorable impact on the effective tax rate from the indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings due to lower foreign statutory tax rates as compared to the domestic tax rate. The additional cost associated with the proposed US Foods merger resulted in lower state taxes.
 
The effective tax rate of 36.9% for fiscal 2014 was negatively impacted primarily by two items. First, a non-deductible penalty, that the company incurred, had an unfavorable tax impact of $6.2 million . Second, we recorded net tax expense of $5.2 million for tax and interest related to various federal, foreign and state uncertain tax positions. This negative impact was partially offset by the recording of $5.7 million of tax benefit related to disqualifying dispositions of Sysco stock pursuant to share-based compensation arrangements. Indefinitely reinvested earnings taxed at foreign statutory rates less than our domestic tax rate also had the impact of reducing the effective tax rate.

The effective tax rate for fiscal 2013 was 35.9% .  Indefinitely reinvested earnings taxed at foreign statutory tax rates that are lower than our domestic tax rate had the impact of reducing the effective tax rate.
 
Uncertain Tax Positions
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year
$
49,180

 
$
108,337

Additions for tax positions related to prior years
797

 
2,128

Reductions for tax positions related to prior years
(8,001
)
 
(41,802
)
Reductions due to settlements with taxing authorities
(4,430
)
 
(19,483
)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year
$
37,546

 
$
49,180

 
As of June 27, 2015 , the gross amount of liability for accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was $33.4 million .  The expense recorded for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in fiscal 2015 was not material .   
 
As of June 28, 2014 , the gross amount of liability for accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was $36.7 million . The expense recorded for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in fiscal 2014 was $14.8 million . In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , we reclassified a receivable that would arise upon the resolution of an unrecognized tax benefit from a gross position in other assets to a net position in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet due to a change in circumstances related to transfer pricing positions

If Sysco were to recognize all unrecognized tax benefits recorded as of June 27, 2015 , approximately $27.7 million  of the $37.5 million reserve would reduce the effective tax rate.  If Sysco were to recognize all unrecognized tax benefits recorded as of June 28, 2014 , approximately $35.1 million  of the $49.2 million reserve would reduce the effective tax rate.  It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits with respect to certain of the company’s unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease in the next twelve months either because Sysco’s positions are sustained on audit or because the company agrees to their disallowance.  Items that may cause changes to unrecognized tax benefits primarily include the consideration of

90



various filing requirements in various states and the allocation of income and expense between tax jurisdictions.  In addition, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits recognized within the next twelve months may decrease due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain years in various jurisdictions; however, it is possible that a jurisdiction may open an audit on one of these years prior to the statute of limitations expiring.  At this time, an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible change cannot be made. 
 
The IRS has open audits for Sysco’s 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 federal income tax returns.  As of June 27, 2015 , Sysco’s tax returns in the majority of the state and local jurisdictions and Canada are no longer subject to audit for the years before 2009.  However, in Canada, the company remains open to transfer pricing adjustments back to 2003 for some entities.  Certain tax jurisdictions require partial to full payment on audit assessments or the posting of letters of credit in order to proceed to the appeals process.  Although the outcome of tax audits is generally uncertain, the company believes that adequate amounts of tax, including interest and penalties, have been accrued for any adjustments that may result from those open years. 
 
Other
 
Undistributed income of certain consolidated foreign subsidiaries at June 27, 2015 amounted to $1.1 billion for which no deferred U.S. income tax provision has been recorded because Sysco intends to permanently reinvest such income in those foreign operations.  An estimate of any U.S. income or foreign withholding taxes that may be applicable upon actual or deemed repatriation is not practical due to the complexities associated with the hypothetical calculation.
20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Proceedings
 
Sysco is engaged in various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully adjudicated.  The likelihood of loss for these legal proceedings, based on definitions within contingency accounting literature, ranges from remote to reasonably possible to probable.  When probable and reasonably estimable, the losses have been accrued.  Based on estimates of the range of potential losses associated with these matters, management does not believe the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the company.  However, the final results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and if the company failed to prevail in one or more of these legal matters, and the associated realized losses were to exceed the company’s current estimates of the range of potential losses, the company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations could be materially adversely affected in future periods.
 
Fuel Commitments
 
Sysco routinely enters into forward purchase commitments for a portion of its projected diesel fuel requirements.  As of June 27, 2015 , we had forward diesel fuel commitments totaling approximately $99.3 million through June 2016 .    
 
Other Commitments
 
Sysco has committed to aggregate product purchases for resale in order to benefit from a centralized approach to purchasing.  A majority of these agreements expire within one year ; however, certain agreements have terms through fiscal 2019 .  These agreements commit the company to a minimum volume at various pricing terms, including fixed pricing, variable pricing or a combination thereof.  Minimum amounts committed to as of June 27, 2015 totaled approximately $3.4 billion .  Minimum amounts committed to by year are as follows:
 
Amount
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
2,553,305

2017
818,521

2018
29,035

2019
2,863

2020
2,863

2021
1,491


Sysco has contracts with various third party service providers to receive information technology services.  The services have been committed for periods up to fiscal 2019 and may be extended.  As of June 27, 2015 , the total remaining cost of the

91



services over that period is expected to be approximately $485.5 million .  A portion of this committed amount may be reduced by Sysco utilizing less than estimated resources and can be increased by Sysco utilizing more than estimated resources.  Certain agreements allow adjustments for inflation.  Sysco may also cancel a portion or all of the services provided subject to termination fees that decrease over time.  If Sysco were to terminate all of the services in fiscal 2016 , the estimated termination fees incurred in fiscal 2016 would be approximately $18.1 million .
21. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
The company has aggregated its operating companies into two reporting segments, Broadline and SYGMA, as defined in the accounting literature related to disclosures about segments of an enterprise.  The Broadline reportable segment is an aggregation of the company’s U.S. and International Broadline segments located in the Bahamas, Canada, Costa Rica and Ireland.  Broadline operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to both traditional and chain restaurant customers, hospitals, schools, hotels, industrial caterers and other venues where foodservice products are served.  SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to certain chain restaurant customer locations.  "Other" financial information is attributable to the company's other operating segments, including the company's specialty produce, custom-cut meat operations, lodging industry segments, a company that distributes specialty imported products, a company that distributes to international customers and the company’s Sysco Ventures platform, which includes a suite of technology solutions that help support the business needs of Sysco’s customers.  In fiscal 2015 , our leadership structure was realigned and now our custom-cut meat operations no longer report through our U.S. broadline leadership. As a result, these operations are no longer included in our Broadline segment and now reported in "Other." Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. 
 
The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those disclosed by Sysco for its consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales primarily represent products the Broadline and SYGMA operating companies procured from the specialty produce, custom-cut meat operations, imported specialty products and a company that distributes to international customers.  Management evaluates the performance of each of the operating segments based on its respective operating income results.   Corporate expenses and adjustments generally include all expenses of the corporate office and Sysco’s shared service center.  These also include all share-based compensation costs.


92



The following table sets forth the financial information for Sysco’s business segments:
 
Fiscal Year
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
Broadline
$
38,652,211

 
$
36,808,051

 
$
35,284,529

SYGMA
6,076,215

 
6,177,804

 
5,780,103

Other
5,270,518

 
4,678,954

 
4,388,261

Intersegment sales
(1,318,192
)
 
(1,148,097
)
 
(1,041,660
)
Total
$
48,680,752

 
$
46,516,712

 
$
44,411,233

Operating income:
 
 
 
 
 
Broadline
$
2,567,954

 
$
2,426,908

 
$
2,361,442

SYGMA
20,521

 
38,048

 
52,016

Other
135,885

 
142,419

 
139,337

Total segments
2,724,360

 
2,607,375

 
2,552,795

Corporate expenses and adjustments
(1,494,998
)
 
(1,020,253
)
 
(894,317
)
Total operating income
1,229,362

 
1,587,122

 
1,658,478

Interest expense
254,807

 
123,741

 
128,495

Other expense (income), net
(33,592
)
 
(12,243
)
 
(17,472
)
Earnings before income taxes
$
1,008,147

 
$
1,475,624

 
$
1,547,455

Depreciation and amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
Broadline
$
278,553

 
$
296,267

 
$
303,084

SYGMA
29,753

 
28,164

 
28,059

Other
54,086

 
41,704

 
38,721

Total segments
362,392

 
366,135

 
369,864

Corporate
218,572

 
189,927

 
142,684

Total
$
580,964

 
$
556,062

 
$
512,548

Capital expenditures:
 
 
 
 
 
Broadline
$
199,831

 
$
276,314

 
$
265,578

SYGMA
36,948

 
34,671

 
18,078

Other
69,193

 
101,128

 
66,182

Total segments
305,972

 
412,113

 
349,838

Corporate
236,858

 
111,093

 
162,024

Total
$
542,830

 
$
523,206

 
$
511,862

Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Broadline
$
7,730,239

 
$
8,611,776

 
$
9,893,743

SYGMA
512,044

 
513,587

 
485,520

Other
1,415,038

 
1,379,910

 
1,279,119

Total segments
9,657,321

 
10,505,273

 
11,658,382

Corporate
8,331,960

 
2,635,840

 
1,007,384

Total
$
17,989,281

 
$
13,141,113

 
$
12,665,766

    

93



The sales mix for the principal product categories for each fiscal year is as follows:
 
Fiscal Year
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Fresh and frozen meats
$
10,080,290

 
$
8,809,148

 
$
8,242,423

Canned and dry products
7,999,250

 
8,383,007

 
8,310,634

Frozen fruits, vegetables, bakery and other
6,339,537

 
6,196,362

 
6,023,990

Dairy products
5,199,036

 
4,956,895

 
4,669,986

Poultry
5,189,496

 
4,814,949

 
4,580,445

Fresh produce
3,828,298

 
3,725,108

 
3,540,027

Paper and disposables
3,507,007

 
3,438,074

 
3,364,965

Seafood
2,490,523

 
2,401,021

 
2,167,588

Beverage products
1,754,944

 
1,671,000

 
1,643,034

Janitorial products
1,102,855

 
1,050,187

 
1,013,488

Equipment and smallwares
661,254

 
678,454

 
637,680

Medical supplies
528,262

 
392,507

 
216,973

Total
$
48,680,752

 
$
46,516,712

 
$
44,411,233

 
Information concerning geographic areas is as follows:
 
Fiscal Year
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Sales: (1)
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
$
43,146,591

 
$
40,612,963

 
$
38,985,715

Canada
4,727,742

 
4,923,672

 
4,698,814

Other
806,419

 
980,077

 
726,704

Total
$
48,680,752

 
$
46,516,712

 
$
44,411,233

Long-lived assets: (2)
 

 
 

 
 

U.S.
$
3,519,610

 
$
3,520,449

 
$
3,593,346

Canada
317,231

 
347,440

 
307,605

Other
145,302

 
117,729

 
77,120

Total
$
3,982,143

 
$
3,985,618

 
$
3,978,071

 
(1) Represents sales to external customers from businesses operating in these countries.
(2) Long-lived assets represents net property, plant and equipment reported in the country in which they are held.
22.  SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION – SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEES
 
On January 19, 2011, the wholly-owned U.S. Broadline subsidiaries of Sysco Corporation entered into full and unconditional guarantees of all outstanding senior notes and debentures of Sysco Corporation.  Borrowings under the company’s revolving credit facility supporting the company’s U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs are also covered under these guarantees.  As of June 27, 2015 , Sysco had a total of $7.3 billion in senior notes, debentures and commercial paper outstanding that was covered by these guarantees, including the $5 billion of senior notes issued in October 2014. See Note 11, "Debt and Other Financing Arrangements," for further discussion of the October 2014 senior notes issuance.  All subsidiary guarantors are 100% -owned by the parent company, all guarantees are full and unconditional and all guarantees are joint and several, except that the guarantee of any subsidiary guarantor with respect to a series of senior notes or debentures may be released under certain customary circumstances.  If we exercise our defeasance option with respect to the senior notes or debentures of any series, then any subsidiary guarantor effectively will be released with respect to that series.  Further, each subsidiary guarantee will remain in full force and effect until the earliest to occur of the date, if any, on which (1) the applicable subsidiary guarantor shall consolidate with or merge into Sysco Corporation or any successor of Sysco Corporation and (2) Sysco Corporation or any successor of Sysco Corporation consolidates with or merges into the applicable subsidiary guarantor. 
 

94



The following condensed consolidating financial statements present separately the financial position, comprehensive income and cash flows of the parent issuer (Sysco Corporation), the guarantors (the majority of the company's U.S. Broadline subsidiaries) and all other non-guarantor subsidiaries of Sysco (Other Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) on a combined basis with eliminating entries. 
 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 
June 27, 2015
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Current assets
$
4,894,387

 
$
4,012,924

 
$
2,586,993

 


 
$
11,494,304

Investment in subsidiaries
9,088,455

 

 

 
(9,088,455
)
 

Plant and equipment,  net
510,285

 
1,694,659

 
1,777,199

 


 
3,982,143

Other assets
371,802

 
522,566

 
1,618,466

 


 
2,512,834

Total assets
$
14,864,929

 
$
6,230,149

 
$
5,982,658

 
$
(9,088,455
)
 
$
17,989,281

Current liabilities
$
5,851,364

 
$
1,658,558

 
$
1,889,693

 


 
$
9,399,615

Intercompany payables (receivables)
973,497

 
(1,996,915
)
 
1,023,418

 


 

Long-term debt
2,154,923

 
10,121

 
106,781

 


 
2,271,825

Other liabilities
624,795

 
278,458

 
113,060

 


 
1,016,313

Noncontrolling interest

 

 
41,304

 
 
 
$
41,304

Shareholders’ equity  
5,260,350

 
6,279,927

 
2,808,402

 
(9,088,455
)
 
5,260,224

Total liabilities and  shareholders’ equity
$
14,864,929

 
$
6,230,149

 
$
5,982,658

 
$
(9,088,455
)
 
$
17,989,281

 
 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 
June 28, 2014
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Current assets
$
254,766

 
$
3,928,660

 
$
2,498,546

 
$

 
$
6,681,972

Investment in subsidiaries
8,013,214

 

 

 
(8,013,214
)
 

Plant and equipment,  net
496,953

 
1,783,262

 
1,705,403

 

 
3,985,618

Other assets
317,208

 
524,468

 
1,631,847

 

 
2,473,523

Total assets
$
9,082,141

 
$
6,236,390

 
$
5,835,796

 
$
(8,013,214
)
 
$
13,141,113

Current liabilities
$
793,240

 
$
1,008,366

 
$
2,566,024

 
$

 
$
4,367,630

Intercompany payables (receivables)
20,107

 
(239,539
)
 
219,432

 

 

Long-term debt
2,321,721

 
14,094

 
21,515

 

 
2,357,330

Other liabilities
680,378

 
328,185

 
140,895

 

 
1,149,458

Shareholders’ equity  
5,266,695

 
5,125,284

 
2,887,930

 
(8,013,214
)
 
5,266,695

Total liabilities and  shareholders’ equity
$
9,082,141

 
$
6,236,390

 
$
5,835,796

 
$
(8,013,214
)
 
$
13,141,113


95



 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 
Year Ended June 27, 2015
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Sales
$

 
$
32,626,221

 
$
17,477,986

 
$
(1,423,455
)
 
$
48,680,752

Cost of sales

 
26,572,257

 
14,980,434

 
(1,423,455
)
 
40,129,236

Gross profit

 
6,053,964

 
2,497,552

 

 
8,551,516

Operating expenses
1,232,956

 
3,709,320

 
2,379,878

 

 
7,322,154

Operating income (loss)
(1,232,956
)
 
2,344,644

 
117,674

 

 
1,229,362

Interest expense (income)
323,918

 
(108,233
)
 
39,122

 

 
254,807

Other expense (income), net
(9,496
)
 
(3,609
)
 
(20,487
)
 

 
(33,592
)
Earnings (losses) before income taxes
(1,547,378
)
 
2,456,486

 
99,039

 

 
1,008,147

Income tax (benefit) provision
(493,263
)
 
783,066

 
31,571

 

 
321,374

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
1,740,888

 

 

 
(1,740,888
)
 

Net earnings
686,773

 
1,673,420

 
67,468

 
(1,740,888
)
 
686,773

Other comprehensive income (loss)
(280,534
)
 


 
(232,185
)
 
232,185

 
(280,534
)
Comprehensive income
$
406,239

 
$
1,673,420

 
$
(164,717
)
 
$
(1,508,703
)
 
$
406,239

 
 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 
Year Ended June 28, 2014
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Sales
$

 
$
30,741,979

 
$
16,979,494

 
$
(1,204,761
)
 
$
46,516,712

Cost of sales

 
24,990,377

 
14,550,061

 
(1,204,761
)
 
38,335,677

Gross profit

 
5,751,602

 
2,429,433

 

 
8,181,035

Operating expenses
804,177

 
3,520,577

 
2,269,159

 

 
6,593,913

Operating income (loss)
(804,177
)
 
2,231,025

 
160,274

 

 
1,587,122

Interest expense (income)
232,140

 
(102,086
)
 
(6,313
)
 

 
123,741

Other expense (income), net
(7,434
)
 
217

 
(5,026
)
 

 
(12,243
)
Earnings (losses) before income taxes
(1,028,883
)
 
2,332,894

 
171,613

 

 
1,475,624

Income tax (benefit) provision
(379,369
)
 
860,184

 
63,276

 

 
544,091

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
1,581,047

 

 

 
(1,581,047
)
 

Net earnings
931,533

 
1,472,710

 
108,337

 
(1,581,047
)
 
931,533

Other comprehensive income (loss)
(195,726
)
 

 
(3,106
)
 
3,106

 
(195,726
)
Comprehensive income
$
735,807

 
$
1,472,710

 
$
105,231

 
$
(1,577,941
)
 
$
735,807

 

96



 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 
Year Ended June 29, 2013
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Sales
$

 
$
30,162,329

 
$
15,335,180

 
$
(1,086,276
)
 
$
44,411,233

Cost of sales

 
24,385,677

 
13,115,225

 
(1,086,276
)
 
36,414,626

Gross profit

 
5,776,652

 
2,219,955

 

 
7,996,607

Operating expenses
694,323

 
3,610,907

 
2,032,899

 

 
6,338,129

Operating income (loss)
(694,323
)
 
2,165,745

 
187,056

 

 
1,658,478

Interest expense (income)
298,474

 
(177,421
)
 
7,442

 

 
128,495

Other expense (income), net
(12,864
)
 
(4,554
)
 
(54
)
 

 
(17,472
)
Earnings (losses) before income taxes
(979,933
)
 
2,347,720

 
179,668

 

 
1,547,455

Income tax (benefit) provision
(351,474
)
 
842,062

 
64,440

 

 
555,028

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
1,620,886

 

 

 
(1,620,886
)
 

Net earnings
992,427

 
1,505,658

 
115,228

 
(1,620,886
)
 
992,427

Other comprehensive income (loss)
215,929

 

 
(33,191
)
 
33,191

 
215,929

Comprehensive income
$
1,208,356

 
$
1,505,658

 
$
82,037

 
$
(1,587,695
)
 
$
1,208,356

 
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows
 
Year Ended June 27, 2015
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used for):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
(359,239
)
 
$
2,363,836

 
$
(449,113
)
 
$
1,555,484

Investing activities
(160,234
)
 
(108,099
)
 
(386,013
)
 
(654,346
)
Financing activities
3,832,479

 
(6,022
)
 
71,105

 
3,897,562

Effect of exchange rate on cash

 

 
(81,702
)
 
(81,702
)
Intercompany activity
1,379,112

 
(2,251,109
)
 
871,997

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,692,118

 
(1,394
)
 
26,274

 
4,716,998

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
158,957

 
27,772

 
226,317

 
413,046

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
4,851,075

 
$
26,378

 
$
252,591

 
$
5,130,044

 
 
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows
 
Year Ended June 28, 2014
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used for):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
(504,119
)
 
$
1,541,062

 
$
455,872

 
$
1,492,815

Investing activities
(51,290
)
 
(171,979
)
 
(353,569
)
 
(576,838
)
Financing activities
(919,627
)
 
3,872

 
(103
)
 
(915,858
)
Effect of exchange rate on cash

 

 
642

 
642

Intercompany activity
1,426,402

 
(1,369,478
)
 
(56,924
)
 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(48,634
)
 
3,477

 
45,918

 
761

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
207,591

 
24,295

 
180,399

 
412,285

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
158,957

 
$
27,772

 
$
226,317

 
$
413,046

 

97



 
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows
 
Year Ended June 29, 2013
 
Sysco
 
Certain U.S.
Broadline
Subsidiaries
 
Other
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Totals
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used for):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
(449,417
)
 
$
1,705,950

 
$
255,061

 
$
1,511,594

Investing activities
(105,314
)
 
(140,217
)
 
(666,351
)
 
(911,882
)
Financing activities
(887,707
)
 
(15,666
)
 
29,165

 
(874,208
)
Effect of exchange rate on cash

 

 
(2,086
)
 
(2,086
)
Intercompany activity
1,178,922

 
(1,560,250
)
 
381,328

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(263,516
)
 
(10,183
)
 
(2,883
)
 
(276,582
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
471,107

 
34,478

 
183,282

 
688,867

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
207,591

 
$
24,295

 
$
180,399

 
$
412,285

23. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
 
Financial information for each quarter in the years ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 is set forth below:
 
Fiscal 2015 Quarter Ended
 
 
 
September 27,
 
December 27,
 
March 28,
 
June 27,
 
Fiscal Year
 
(In thousands except for per share data)
Sales
$
12,445,081

 
$
12,087,074

 
$
11,746,659

 
$
12,401,938

 
$
48,680,752

Cost of sales
10,256,364

 
10,001,937

 
9,689,161

 
10,181,774

 
40,129,236

Gross profit
2,188,717

 
2,085,137

 
2,057,498

 
2,220,164

 
8,551,516

Operating expenses
1,723,104

 
1,769,691

 
1,730,190

 
2,099,169

 
7,322,154

Operating income
465,613

 
315,446

 
327,308

 
120,995

 
1,229,362

Interest expense
30,934

 
77,042

 
69,550

 
77,281

 
254,807

Other expense (income), net
(2,188
)
 
2,207

 
(8,577
)
 
(25,034
)
 
(33,592
)
Earnings before income taxes
436,867

 
236,197

 
266,335

 
68,748

 
1,008,147

Income taxes
158,054

 
78,218

 
89,380

 
(4,278
)
 
321,374

Net earnings
$
278,813

 
$
157,979

 
$
176,955

 
$
73,026

 
$
686,773

Per share:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic net earnings
$
0.47

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.30

 
$
0.12

 
$
1.16

Diluted net earnings
0.47

 
0.27

 
0.30

 
0.12

 
1.15

Dividends declared
0.29

 
0.30

 
0.30

 
0.30

 
1.19

Market price — high/low
39-36

 
41-36

 
41-38

 
39-36

 
41-36


98



 
Fiscal 2014 Quarter Ended
 
 
 
September 28,
 
December 28,
 
March 29,
 
June 28,
 
Fiscal Year
 
(In thousands except for per share data)
Sales
$
11,714,267

 
$
11,237,969

 
$
11,277,484

 
$
12,286,992

 
$
46,516,712

Cost of sales
9,648,780

 
9,273,018

 
9,282,743

 
10,131,136

 
38,335,677

Gross profit
2,065,487

 
1,964,951

 
1,994,741

 
2,155,856

 
8,181,035

Operating expenses
1,587,289

 
1,613,174

 
1,662,116

 
1,731,334

 
6,593,913

Operating income
478,198

 
351,777

 
332,625

 
424,522

 
1,587,122

Interest expense
30,528

 
29,784

 
32,224

 
31,205

 
123,741

Other (income), net
(4,534
)
 
(4,211
)
 
3,718

 
(7,216
)
 
(12,243
)
Earnings before income taxes
452,204

 
326,204

 
296,683

 
400,533

 
1,475,624

Income taxes
166,614

 
115,369

 
115,746

 
146,362

 
544,091

Net earnings
$
285,590

 
$
210,835

 
$
180,937

 
$
254,171

 
$
931,533

Per share:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic net earnings
$
0.49

 
$
0.36

 
$
0.31

 
$
0.43

 
$
1.59

Diluted net earnings
0.48

 
0.36

 
0.31

 
0.43

 
1.58

Dividends declared
0.28

 
0.29

 
0.29

 
0.29

 
1.15

Market price — high/low
36-31

 
43-31

 
37-34

 
38-35

 
43-31

Percentage change — 2015 vs. 2014:
 
Quarter 1
 
Quarter 2
 
Quarter 3
 
Quarter 4
 
Fiscal Year
Sales
6
 %
 
8
 %
 
4
 %
 
1
 %
 
5
 %
Operating income
(3
)
 
(10
)
 
(2
)
 
(71
)
 
(23
)
Net earnings
(2
)
 
(25
)
 
(2
)
 
(71
)
 
(26
)
Basic net earnings per share
(4
)
 
(25
)
 
(3
)
 
(72
)
 
(27
)
Diluted net earnings per share
(2
)
 
(25
)
 
(3
)
 
(72
)
 
(27
)
 
Financial results are impacted by accounting changes and the adoption of various accounting standards.  See Note 2, “Changes in Accounting.”
Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
 
Sysco’s management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 27, 2015 .  The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.  Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.  Sysco’s disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.  Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 27, 2015 , our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, Sysco’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
 
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is included in the financial statement pages at page 49.
 

99



No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2015  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.   Other Information
 
None.  
PART III
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information required by this item will be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the following captions, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto: “Corporate Governance,” “Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Board of Directors Matters.”
Item 11.  Executive Compensation
 
The information required by this item will be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the following captions, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto: “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Report of the Compensation Committee,” “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation.
Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by this item will be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the following captions, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto: “Stock Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information."
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The information required by this item will be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the following caption, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto: “Corporate Governance – Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance – Director Independence.”
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
The information required by this item will be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the following caption, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto: “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
PART IV
Item 15.   Exhibits

(a)
The following documents are filed, or incorporated by reference, as part of this Form 10-K:
 
1.
All financial statements.  See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 48 of this Form 10-K.
2.
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the information is set forth in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
3.
Exhibits.
 
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, are filed or furnished as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

100



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sysco Corporation has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 24th day of August, 2015 .
 
SYSCO CORPORATION
 
By
/s/ WILLIAM J. DELANEY
 
William J. DeLaney
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Sysco Corporation in the capacities indicated and on the date indicated above.
 
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, FINANCIAL & ACCOUNTING OFFICERS:
 
/s/   WILLIAM J. DELANEY
President and Chief Executive Officer
William J. DeLaney
(principal executive officer)
 
 
/s/   ROBERT C. KREIDLER
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert C. Kreidler
(principal financial officer)
 
 
/s/   JOEL T. GRADE
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
Joel T. Grade
(principal accounting officer)

DIRECTORS:
 
/s/   JOHN M. CASSADAY
/s/   JOSEPH A. HAFNER, JR.
John M. Cassaday
Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
 
 
/s/   JUDITH B. CRAVEN
/s/   HANS-JOACHIM KOERBER
Judith B. Craven
Hans-Joachim Koerber
 
 
/s/   WILLIAM J. DELANEY
/s/   NANCY S. NEWCOMB
William J. DeLaney
Nancy S. Newcomb
 
 
/s/   LARRY C. GLASSCOCK
/s/   RICHARD G. TILGHMAN
Larry C. Glasscock
Richard G. Tilghman
 
 
/s/   JONATHAN GOLDEN
/s/   JACKIE M. WARD
Jonathan Golden
Jackie M. Ward

101



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibits.
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2003 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
3.3
Form of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 1996 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
3.4
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sysco Corporation dated November 14, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.1
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1995, between Sysco Corporation and First Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 6, 1995 (File No. 33-60023).
 
 
 
4.2
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 25, 1997 between Sysco Corporation and First Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(g) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.3
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 1998 between Sysco Corporation and First Union National Bank, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.4
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 5, 2004 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly First Union National Bank of North Carolina), as Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(j) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.5
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated September 22, 2005 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2005 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.6
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.7
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.8
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.9
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.10
Form of Guarantee of Indebtedness of Sysco Corporation under Exhibits 4.1 through 4.9 as executed by Sysco’s U.S. Broadline subsidiaries, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2011 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.11
Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Initial Guarantee, dated February 17, 2012 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, the Trustee and the Initial Guarantors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(o) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 17, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.12
Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated June 12, 2012 among Sysco, the Guarantors and the Trustee relating to the 2015 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.13
Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated June 12, 2012 among Sysco, the Guarantors and the Trustee relating to the 2022 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.14
Indenture dated May 23, 2002 between Sysco International, Co., Sysco Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed August 21, 2002 (File No. 333-98489).
 
 
 




4.15
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated July 2, 2010, between Sysco International, ULC, as successor by conversion and name change to Sysco International Co., Sysco Corporation, as Guarantor, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010 filed on August 31, 2010 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
4.16
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated February 13, 2007, by and among Sysco Corporation and Sysco International Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sysco Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 6, 2008 (File No. 333-149086).
 
 
 
10.1
Credit Agreement dated December 29, 2011 between Sysco Corporation, Sysco International, ULC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, and certain Lenders and Guarantors party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 filed on February 7, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
10.2
First Amendment, dated November 29, 2012, in the form of a Maturity Date Extension Letter Agreement, amending that certain Credit Agreement dated December 29, 2011 between Sysco Corporation, Sysco International, ULC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, and certain Lenders and Guarantors party thereto, incorporated, by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2012 filed on February 5, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.3
Second Amendment, dated as of January 31, 2014, to the Credit Agreement dated December 29, 2011 by and among Sysco Corporation, Sysco International, ULC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch and the lenders party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.4
Issuing and Paying Agent Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2014, between Sysco Corporation and U.S. Bank; National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2014 filed on February 2, 2015 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.5
Amended and Restated Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2014, between Sysco Corporation, as issuer, and JPMorgan Morgan Securities LLC, as Dealer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2014 filed on February 2, 2015(File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.6
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2014, between Sysco Corporation, as issuer, and Goldman, Sachs & Co, as Dealer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2014 filed on February 2, 2015(File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.7#
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2015, between Sysco Corporation, as issuer, and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as Dealer.
 
 
 
10.8
Demand Facility Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, between SFS Canada I, LP and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 filed on August 30, 2011 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.9
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, between Sysco Corporation and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 filed on August 30, 2011 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.10
364-Day Bridge Term Loan Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, among Sysco Corporation, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Administrative Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.11+
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2013, by and among Sysco Corporation, Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLC, Kohlberg, Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and the stockholders named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.12†
Sixth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 filed on November 9, 2010 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.13†
First Amendment to the Sixth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on May 8, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.14†
Seventh Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2012 filed on February 4, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 




10.15†
Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 29, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013 filed on August 27, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.16†#
2015-1 Amendment to the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
 
 
 
10.17†
 
Tenth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 filed on November 9, 2010 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.18†
First Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 filed on August 30, 2011 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.19†
Second Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on May 8, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
10.20†
Eleventh Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2012 filed on February 4, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.21†
Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, including the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation MIP Retirement Program, attached as Appendix I, effective as of June 29, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013 filed on August 27, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
10.22†
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2014 filed on May 6, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.23†
Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation MIP Retirement Program, effective as of June 29, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013 filed on August 27, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
10.24†
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation MIP Retirement Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2014 filed on May 6, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.25†
Sysco Corporation Management Savings Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2012 filed on February 4, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.26†
Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Management Savings Plan, effective as of June 29, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013 filed on August 27, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
10.27 †
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Management Savings Plan., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2014 filed on May 6, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.28†#
 
2015-1 Amendment to the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Management Savings Plan.
10.29†
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement issued to executive officers on September 2, 2004 under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2004 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.30†
2004 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed September 24, 2004 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.31†
2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.32†
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement issued to executive officers under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2007 filed on February 5, 2008 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.33†
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement issued to Robert C. Kreidler effective October 5, 2009 under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 filed on November 3, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 




10.34†
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement issued to executive officers under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 filed on November 3, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
10.35 †
Sysco Corporation 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form S-8 filed on November 15, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
10.36†
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement issued to executive officers under the Sysco Corporation 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 16544).
10.37 †
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement issued to executive officers under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 16544).
10.38†
Form of Sysco Protective Covenants Agreement (RSU Grant) issued to executive officers in connection with a Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement issued under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2013 filed on February 4, 2014 (File No. 16544).
 
 
 
10.39†
First Amended and Restated 2008 Cash Performance Unit Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2009 filed on November 3, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.40†
2009 Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex C to the Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed on October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.41†
Form of Fiscal Year 2014 Bonus Award under the 2009 Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2013 filed on November 5, 2013 (File No. 1-6544).
10.42†
Form of Fiscal Year 2015 Bonus Award under the 2009 Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2014 filed on November 4, 2014 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.43†
Description of Sysco Corporation's Executive Relocation Expense Reimbursement Policy, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 filed on February 8, 2011 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.44†
 
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Proxy Statement filed on September 24, 2001 (File No. 1-6544).
10.45†
Form of Retainer Stock Agreement for issuance to Non-Employee Directors under the Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2005 filed on February 10, 2005 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.46†
2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.47†
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement under the 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011 filed on May 10, 2011(File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.48†
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement under the 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan for those individuals who elected to defer receipt of shares under the 2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011 filed on May 10, 2011(File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.49†
Second Amended and Restated Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan dated April 1, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2002 filed on September 25, 2002 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.50†
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan dated July 12, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bb) to Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2002 filed on September 25, 2002 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.51†
Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 filed on February 9, 2006 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.52†
Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on May 8, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.53†
Second Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation 2005 Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2008 filed on August 26, 2008 (File No. 1-6544).




 
 
 
10.54†
 
First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation 2005 Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on May 8, 2012 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.55†
2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2009 filed on February 2, 2010 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.56†#
Description of Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors.
 
 
 
10.57†
Form of Indemnification Agreement with Non-Employee Directors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2008 filed on August 26, 2008 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
10.58†#
Letter Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, between Sysco Corporation and Robert C. Kreidler.
 
 
 
10.59
 
Agreement and Release, dated June 26, 2015, among USF Holding Corp., Sysco Corporation, Scorpion Corporation I, Inc. and Scorpion Company II, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2015 (File No. 1-6544).
 
 
 
12.1#
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
 
 
 
21.1#
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
 
 
 
23.1#
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
 
 
31.1#
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
31.2#
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.1#
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.2#
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.1#
The following financial information from Sysco Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2015 filed with the SEC on August 24, 2015, formatted in XBRL includes:  (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, (ii) Consolidated Results of Operations for  the periods ended June 27, 2015, June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, (iii) Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity for the periods ended June 27, 2015, June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, (iv) Consolidated Cash Flows for the periods ended June 27, 2015, June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
_________
†  Executive Compensation Arrangement pursuant to 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K
#  Filed Herewith
+  Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 
 
Note:  Debt instruments of Sysco Corporation and its subsidiaries defining the rights of long-term debt holders in principal amounts not exceeding 10% of Sysco Corporation’s consolidated assets have been omitted and will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Exhibit 10.7

COMMERCIAL PAPER DEALER AGREEMENT
4(a)(2) PROGRAM

Between:

SYSCO CORPORATION , as Issuer and
BNY MELLON CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
(“BNYMCM” or the “Dealer”)

Concerning Notes to be issued pursuant to an Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement dated as of February 13, 2015 between the Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Issuing and Paying Agent
Dated as of
February 13, 2015

1



Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement
4(a)(2) Program
This agreement (the “Agreement”) sets forth the understandings between the Issuer and BNYMCM, as Dealer, in connection with the issuance and sale by the Issuer of its short-term promissory notes (the “Notes”) through the Dealer.
Certain terms used in this Agreement are defined in Section 6 hereof.
The Addendum to this Agreement, and any Annexes or Exhibits described in this Agreement or such Addendum, are hereby incorporated into this Agreement and made fully a part hereof.
1.
Offers, Sales and Resales of Notes.
1.1
While (i) the Issuer has and shall have no obligation to sell the Notes to the Dealer or to permit the Dealer to arrange any sale of the Notes for the account of the Issuer, and (ii) the Dealer has and shall have no obligation to purchase the Notes from the Issuer or to arrange any sale of the Notes for the account of the Issuer, the parties hereto agree that in any case where the Dealer purchases Notes from the Issuer, or arranges for the sale of Notes by the Issuer, such Notes will be purchased or sold by the Dealer in reliance on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer contained herein or made pursuant hereto and on the terms and conditions and in the manner provided herein.
1.2
So long as this Agreement shall remain in effect, and in addition to the limitations contained in Section 1.7 hereof, the Issuer shall not, without the consent of the Dealer, offer, solicit or accept offers to purchase, or sell, any Notes except (a) in transactions with one or more dealers which may from time to time after the date hereof become dealers with respect to the Notes by executing with the Issuer one or more agreements which contain provisions substantially identical to those contained in Section 1 of this Agreement, of which the Issuer hereby undertakes to provide the Dealer prompt notice or (b) in transactions with the other dealers listed on the Addendum hereto, which are executing agreements with the Issuer which contain provisions substantially identical to Section 1 of this Agreement contemporaneously herewith. In no event shall the Issuer offer, solicit or accept offers to purchase, or sell, any Notes directly on its own behalf in transactions with persons other than broker-dealers as specifically permitted in this Section 1.2.
1.3
The Notes shall be in a minimum denomination of $250,000 or integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof, will bear such interest rates, if interest bearing, or will be sold at such discount from their face amounts, as shall be agreed upon by the Dealer and the Issuer, shall have a maturity not exceeding 270 days from the date of issuance and may have such terms as are specified in Exhibit C hereto, the Private Placement Memorandum, a pricing supplement, or as otherwise agreed upon by the applicable purchaser and the Issuer. The Notes shall not contain any provision for extension, renewal or automatic “rollover.”
1.4
The authentication and issuance of, and payment for, the Notes shall be effected in accordance with the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, and the Notes shall be either individual physical certificates or book-entry notes evidenced by one or more master notes (each, a “Master Note”) registered in the name of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) or its nominee, in the form or forms delivered to the Dealer.

2



1.5
If the Issuer and the Dealer shall agree on the terms of the purchase of any Note by the Dealer or the sale of any Note arranged by the Dealer (including, but not limited to, agreement with respect to the date of issue, purchase price, principal amount, maturity and interest rate or interest rate index and margin (in the case of interest-bearing Notes) or discount thereof (in the case of Notes issued on a discount basis), and appropriate compensation for the Dealer’s services hereunder) pursuant to this Agreement, the Issuer shall cause such Note to be issued and delivered in accordance with the terms of the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement and payment for such Note shall be made by the purchaser thereof, either directly or through the Dealer, to the Issuing and Paying Agent, for the account of the Issuer. Except as otherwise agreed, in the event that the Dealer is acting as an agent and a purchaser shall either fail to accept delivery of or make payment for a Note on the date fixed for settlement, the Dealer shall promptly notify the Issuer, and if the Dealer has theretofore paid the Issuer for the Note, the Issuer will promptly return such funds to the Dealer against its return of the Note to the Issuer, in the case of a certificated Note, and upon notice of such failure in the case of a book-entry Note. If such failure occurred for any reason other than default by the Dealer, the Issuer shall reimburse the Dealer on an equitable basis for the Dealer’s loss of the use of such funds for the period such funds were credited to the Issuer’s account.
1.6
The Dealer and the Issuer hereby establish and agree to observe the following procedures in connection with offers, sales and subsequent resales or other transfers of the Notes:
(a)
Offers and sales of the Notes by or through the Dealer shall be made only to: (i) investors reasonably believed by the Dealer to be Qualified Institutional Buyers or Institutional Accredited Investors and (ii) non-bank fiduciaries or agents that will be purchasing Notes for one or more accounts, each of which is reasonably believed by the Dealer to be an Institutional Accredited Investor.
(b)
Resales and other transfers of the Notes by the holders thereof shall be made only in accordance with the restrictions in the legend described in clause (e) below.
(c)
No general solicitation or general advertising shall be used in connection with the offering of the Notes. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, without the prior written approval of the Dealer, the Issuer shall not make any statement to any member of the press regarding the offer or sale of the Notes or issue any press release or publish any “tombstone” or other advertisement relating to the Notes or the offer or sale thereof. To the extent permitted by applicable securities laws, the Issuer shall (i) omit the name of the Dealer from any publicly available filing by the Issuer that makes reference to the Notes, the offer or sale of the Notes or this Agreement, (ii) not include a copy of this Agreement in any such filing or as an exhibit thereto, and (iii) redact the Dealer's name and any contact or other information that could identify the Dealer from any agreement or other information included in such filing.
(d)
No sale of Notes to any one purchaser shall be for less than $250,000 principal or face amount, and no Note shall be issued in a smaller principal or face amount. If the purchaser is a non-bank fiduciary acting on behalf of others, each person for whom such purchaser is acting must purchase at least $250,000 principal or face amount of Notes.
(e)
Offers and sales of the Notes by the Issuer through the Dealer shall be made in accordance with Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and shall be subject to the

3



restrictions described in the legend appearing on Exhibit A hereto. A legend substantially to the effect of such Exhibit A shall appear as part of the Private Placement Memorandum used in connection with offers and sales of Notes hereunder, as well as on each individual certificate representing a Note and each Master Note representing book-entry Notes offered and sold pursuant to this Agreement.
(f)
The Dealer shall furnish or shall have furnished to each purchaser of Notes for which it has acted as the Dealer a copy of the then-current Private Placement Memorandum unless such purchaser has previously received a copy of the Private Placement Memorandum as then in effect. The Private Placement Memorandum shall expressly state that any person to whom Notes are offered shall have an opportunity to ask questions of, and receive information from, the Issuer and the Dealer and shall provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the persons from whom information regarding the Issuer may be obtained.
(g)
The Issuer agrees, for the benefit of the Dealer and each of the holders and prospective purchasers from time to time of the Notes that, if at any time the Issuer shall not be subject to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Issuer will furnish, upon request and at its expense, to the Dealer and to holders and prospective purchasers of Notes information required by Rule 144A(d)(4)(i) in compliance with Rule 144A(d).
(h)
In the event that any Note offered or to be offered by the Dealer would be ineligible for resale under Rule 144A, the Issuer shall immediately notify the Dealer (by telephone, confirmed in writing) of such fact and shall promptly prepare and deliver to the Dealer an amendment or supplement to the Private Placement Memorandum describing the Notes that are ineligible, the reason for such ineligibility and any other relevant information relating thereto.
(i)
The Issuer represents that it is not currently issuing commercial paper in the United States market in reliance upon the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(3) of the Securities Act. The Issuer agrees that, if it shall issue commercial paper after the date hereof in reliance upon such exemption (a) the proceeds from the sale of the Notes will be segregated from the proceeds of the sale of any such commercial paper by being placed in a separate account; (b) the Issuer will institute appropriate corporate procedures to ensure that the offers and sales of notes issued by the Issuer pursuant to the Section 3(a)(3) exemption are not integrated with offerings and sales of Notes hereunder; and (c) the Issuer will comply with each of the requirements of Section 3(a)(3) of the Securities Act in selling commercial paper or other short-term debt securities other than the Notes in the United States.
1.7
The Issuer hereby represents and warrants to the Dealer, in connection with offers, sales and resales of Notes, as follows:
(a)
The Issuer hereby confirms to the Dealer that (except as permitted by Section 1.6(i)) within the preceding six months neither the Issuer nor any person other than the Dealer or the other dealers referred to in Section 1.2 hereof acting on behalf of the Issuer has offered or sold any Notes, or any substantially similar security of the Issuer (including, without limitation, medium-term notes issued by the Issuer), to, or solicited offers to buy any such security from, any person other than the Dealer or the other dealers referred to in Section 1.2 hereof. The Issuer also agrees that (except as permitted by Section 1.6(i)), as long as the Notes are being offered for sale by the Dealer and the other dealers referred to in Section 1.2 hereof as contemplated hereby and until at least six months

4



after the offer of Notes hereunder has been terminated, neither the Issuer nor any person other than the Dealer or the other dealers referred to in Section 1.2 hereof (except as contemplated by Section 1.2 hereof) will offer the Notes or any substantially similar security of the Issuer for sale to, or solicit offers to buy any such security from, any person other than the Dealer or the other dealers referred to in Section 1.2 hereof, it being understood that such agreement is made with a view to bringing the offer and sale of the Notes within the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. The Issuer hereby represents and warrants that it has not taken or omitted to take, and will not take or omit to take, any action that would cause the offering and sale of Notes hereunder to be integrated with any other offering of securities, whether such offering is made by the Issuer or some other party or parties.
(b)
The Issuer will use the proceeds of the sale of the Notes from time to time for the purpose of buying, carrying or trading securities within the meaning of Regulation T and the interpretations thereunder by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As a result, in the event that the Dealer purchases Notes as principal and does not resell such Notes on the day of such purchase, to the extent necessary to comply with Regulation T and the interpretations thereunder, the Dealer will sell such Notes either (i) only to offerees it reasonably believes to be Qualified Institutional Buyers or to Qualified Institutional Buyers it reasonably believes are acting for other Qualified Institutional Buyers, in each case in accordance with Rule 144A or (ii) in a manner which would not cause a violation of Regulation T and the interpretations thereunder.
2.
Representations and Warranties of Issuer.
The Issuer represents and warrants that:
2.1
The Issuer is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation and has all the requisite power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the Notes, this Agreement and the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
2.2
This Agreement and the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer and constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the Issuer enforceable against the Issuer in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law).
2.3
The Notes have been duly authorized, and when issued as provided in the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, will be duly and validly issued and will constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the Issuer enforceable against the Issuer in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law).
2.4
The offer and sale of the Notes in the manner contemplated hereby do not require registration of the Notes under the Securities Act, pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) thereof, and no indenture in respect of the Notes is required to be qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended.

5



2.5
The Notes will rank at least pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Issuer.
2.6
No consent or action of, or filing or registration with, any governmental or public regulatory body or authority, including the SEC, is required to authorize, or is otherwise required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance of, this Agreement, the Notes or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, except as may be required by the securities or Blue Sky laws of the various states in connection with the offer and sale of the Notes.
2.7
Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, nor the issuance of the Notes in accordance with the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and provisions hereof or thereof by the Issuer, will (i) result in the creation or imposition of any mortgage, lien, charge or encumbrance of any nature whatsoever upon any of the properties or assets of the Issuer, or (ii) violate or result in a breach or a default under any of the terms of the Issuer’s charter documents or by-laws, any contract or instrument to which the Issuer is a party or by which it or its property is bound, or any law or regulation, or any order, writ, injunction or decree of any court or government instrumentality, to which the Issuer is subject or by which it or its property is bound, which breach or default might have a material adverse effect on the condition (financial or otherwise), operations or business prospects of the Issuer or the ability of the Issuer to perform its obligations under this Agreement, the Notes or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
2.8
There is no litigation or governmental proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of the Issuer threatened, against or affecting the Issuer or any of its subsidiaries which might result in a material adverse change in the condition (financial or otherwise), operations or business prospects of the Issuer or the ability of the Issuer to perform its obligations under this Agreement, the Notes or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
2.9
The Issuer is not an “investment company” or an entity controlled by an investment company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
2.10
Neither the Private Placement Memorandum nor the Company Information contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
2.11
Each (a) issuance of Notes by the Issuer hereunder and (b) amendment or supplement of the Private Placement Memorandum shall be deemed a representation and warranty by the Issuer to the Dealer, as of the date thereof, that, both before and after giving effect to such issuance and after giving effect to such amendment or supplement, (i) the representations and warranties given by the Issuer set forth in this Section 2 remain true and correct on and as of such date as if made on and as of such date, (ii) in the case of an issuance of Notes, the Notes being issued on such date have been duly and validly issued and constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the Issuer, enforceable against the Issuer in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (iii) in the case of an issuance of Notes, since the date of the most recent Private Placement Memorandum, there has been no material adverse change in the

6



condition (financial or otherwise), operations or business prospects of the Issuer which has not been disclosed to the Dealer in writing and (iv) the Issuer is not in default of any of its obligations hereunder, under the Notes or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
3.
Covenants and Agreements of Issuer.
The Issuer covenants and agrees that:
3.1
The Issuer will give the Dealer prompt notice (but in any event prior to any subsequent issuance of Notes hereunder) of any amendment to, modification of or waiver with respect to, the Notes or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, including a complete copy of any such amendment, modification or waiver.
3.2
The Issuer shall, whenever there shall occur any change in the Issuer’s condition (financial or otherwise), operations or business prospects or any development or occurrence in relation to the Issuer that would be material to holders of the Notes or potential holders of the Notes (including any downgrading or receipt of any notice of intended or potential downgrading or any review for potential change in the rating accorded any of the Issuer’s securities by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization which has published a rating of the Notes), promptly, and in any event prior to any subsequent issuance of Notes hereunder, notify the Dealer (by telephone, confirmed in writing) of such change, development or occurrence.
3.3
The Issuer shall from time to time furnish to the Dealer such information as the Dealer may reasonably request, including, without limitation, any press releases or material provided by the Issuer to any national securities exchange or rating agency, regarding (i) the Issuer’s operations and financial condition, (ii) the due authorization and execution of the Notes and (iii) the Issuer’s ability to pay the Notes as they mature.
3.4
The Issuer will take all such action as the Dealer may reasonably request to ensure that each offer and each sale of the Notes will comply with any applicable state Blue Sky laws; provided, however, that the Issuer shall not be obligated to file any general consent to service of process or to qualify as a foreign corporation in any jurisdiction in which it is not so qualified or subject itself to taxation in respect of doing business in any jurisdiction in which it is not otherwise so subject.
3.5
The Issuer will not be in default of any of its obligations hereunder, under the Notes or under the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, at any time that any of the Notes are outstanding.
3.6
The Issuer shall not issue Notes hereunder until the Dealer shall have received (a) an opinion of counsel to the Issuer, addressed to the Dealer, satisfactory in form and substance to the Dealer, (b) a copy of the executed Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement as then in effect, (c) a copy of resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Issuer, satisfactory in form and substance to the Dealer and certified by the Secretary or similar officer of the Issuer, authorizing execution and delivery by the Issuer of this Agreement, the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement and the Notes and consummation by the Issuer of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, (d) a certificate of the secretary, assistant secretary or other designated officer of the Issuer certifying as to (i) the Issuer’s organizational documents, and attaching true, correct and complete copies thereof, (ii) the Issuer’s representations and warranties being true and correct in all material respects, and (iii) the incumbency of the officers of the Issuer authorized to execute and deliver this

7



Agreement, the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement and the Notes, and take other action on behalf of the Issuer in connection with the transactions contemplated thereby, (e) prior to the issuance of any book-entry Notes represented by a master note registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, a copy of the executed Letter of Representations among the Issuer, the Issuing and Paying Agent and DTC and of the executed master note, (f) prior to the issuance of any Notes in physical form, a copy of such form (unless attached to this Agreement or the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement), (g) confirmation of the then current rating assigned to the Notes by each nationally recognized statistical rating organization then rating the Notes, and (h) such other certificates, opinions, letters and documents as the Dealer shall have reasonably requested.
3.7
The Issuer shall reimburse the Dealer for all of the Dealer’s out-of-pocket expenses related to this Agreement, including expenses incurred in connection with its preparation and negotiation, and the transactions contemplated hereby (including, but not limited to, the printing and distribution of the Private Placement Memorandum), and, if applicable, for the reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of the Dealer’s counsel.
3.8
Except as may be required by law, and any event not unless the Issuer has provided the dealer with at least five business days advance written notice, the Issuer shall not file a Form D (as referenced in Rule 503 under the Securities Act) at any time in respect of the offer or sale of the Notes.
4.
Disclosure.
4.1
The Private Placement Memorandum and its contents (other than the Dealer Information) shall be the sole responsibility of the Issuer. The Private Placement Memorandum shall contain a statement expressly offering an opportunity for each prospective purchaser to ask questions of, and receive answers from, the Issuer concerning the offering of Notes and to obtain relevant additional information which the Issuer possesses or can acquire without unreasonable effort or expense.
4.2
The Issuer agrees to promptly furnish the Dealer the Company Information as it becomes available.
4.3
(a)    The Issuer further agrees to notify the Dealer promptly upon the occurrence of any event relating to or affecting the Issuer that would cause the Company Information then in existence to include an untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
(b) In the event that the Issuer gives the Dealer notice pursuant to Section 4.3(a) and (i) the Issuer is selling Notes in accordance with Section 1, or (ii) the Dealer notifies the Issuer that it then has Notes it is holding in inventory, the Issuer agrees promptly to supplement or amend the Private Placement Memorandum so that the Private Placement Memorandum, as amended or supplemented, shall not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and the Issuer shall make such supplement or amendment available to the Dealer.
(c) In the event that (i) the Issuer gives the Dealer notice pursuant to Section 4.3(a), (ii) (A) the Issuer is not selling Notes in accordance with Section 1 and (B) the Dealer does not notify the Issuer that it is then holding Notes in inventory, and (iii) the Issuer chooses not to promptly amend or supplement the Private Placement Memorandum in the manner described in clause (b) above, then all solicitations and sales of Notes shall be suspended

8



until such time as the Issuer has so amended or supplemented the Private Placement Memorandum, and made such amendment or supplement available to the Dealer.
(d) Without limiting the generality of Section 4.3(a), to the extent that the Private Placement Memorandum sets forth financial information of the Issuer (other than financial information included in a report described in clause (i) of the definition of "Company Information" that (i) is incorporated by reference in the Private Placement Memorandum or (ii) the Private Placement Memorandum expressly states is being made available to holders and prospective purchasers of the Notes but is not otherwise set forth therein), the Issuer shall review, amend and supplement the Private Placement Memorandum on a periodic basis, but no less than at least once annually, to incorporate current financial information of the Issuer to the extent necessary to ensure that the information provided in the Private Placement Memorandum is accurate and complete.
5.    Indemnification and Contribution.
5.1
The Issuer will indemnify and hold harmless the Dealer, each individual, corporation, partnership, trust, association or other entity controlling the Dealer, any affiliate of the Dealer or any such controlling entity and their respective directors, officers, employees, partners, incorporators, shareholders, servants, trustees and agents (hereinafter the “Indemnitees”) against any and all liabilities, penalties, suits, causes of action, losses, damages, claims, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel) or judgments of whatever kind or nature (each a “Claim”), imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against the Indemnitees arising out of or based upon (i) any allegation that the Private Placement Memorandum, the Company Information or any information provided by the Issuer to the Dealer included (as of any relevant time) or includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted (as of any relevant time) or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading or (ii) the breach by the Issuer of any agreement, covenant or representation made in or pursuant to this Agreement. This indemnification shall not apply to the extent that the Claim arises out of or is based upon Dealer Information or that a Claim is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from an Indemnitee’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
5.2
Provisions relating to claims made for indemnification under this Section 5 are set forth on Exhibit B to this Agreement.
5.3
In order to provide for just and equitable contribution in circumstances in which the indemnification provided for in this Section 5 is held to be unavailable or insufficient to hold harmless the Indemnitees, although applicable in accordance with the terms of this Section 5, the Issuer shall contribute to the aggregate costs incurred by the Dealer in connection with any Claim in the proportion of the respective economic interests of the Issuer and the Dealer; provided, however, that such contribution by the Issuer shall be in an amount such that the aggregate costs incurred by the Dealer do not exceed the aggregate of the commissions and fees earned by the Dealer hereunder with respect to the issue or issues of Notes to which such Claim relates. The respective economic interests shall be calculated by reference to the aggregate proceeds to the Issuer of the Notes issued hereunder and the aggregate commissions and fees earned by the Dealer hereunder.
6.    Definitions.
6.1
“Claim” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.

9



6.2
“Company Information” at any given time shall mean the Private Placement Memorandum together with, to the extent applicable, (i) the Issuer’s most recent report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and each report on Form 10-Q or 8-K filed by the Issuer with the SEC since the most recent Form 10-K, (ii) the Issuer’s most recent annual audited financial statements and each interim financial statement or report prepared subsequent thereto, if not included in item (i) above, (iii) the Issuer’s and its affiliates’ other publicly available recent reports, including, but not limited to, any publicly available filings or reports provided to their respective shareholders, (iv) any other information or disclosure prepared pursuant to Section 4.3 hereof and (v) any information prepared or approved by the Issuer for dissemination to investors or potential investors in the Notes.
6.3
“Current Issuing and Paying Agent” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.9(i).
6.4
“Dealer Information” shall mean material concerning the Dealer provided by the Dealer in writing expressly for inclusion in the Private Placement Memorandum.
6.5
“Exchange Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
6.6
“Indemnitee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1.
6.7
“Institutional Accredited Investor” shall mean an institutional investor that is an accredited investor within the meaning of Rule 501 under the Securities Act and that has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it is capable of evaluating and bearing the economic risk of an investment in the Notes, including, but not limited to, a bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act, or a savings and loan association or other institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act, whether acting in its individual or fiduciary capacity.
6.8
“Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement” shall mean the issuing and paying agency agreement described on the cover page of this Agreement, or any replacement thereof, as such agreement may be amended or supplemented from time to time.
6.9
“Issuing and Paying Agent” shall mean the party designated as such on the cover page of this Agreement, or any successor thereto or replacement thereof, as issuing and paying agent under the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
6.10
“Non-bank fiduciary or agent” shall mean a fiduciary or agent other than (a) a bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act, or (b) a savings and loan association, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act.
6.11
“Outstanding Notes” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.9(ii).
6.12
“Private Placement Memorandum” shall mean offering materials prepared in accordance with Section 4 (including materials referred to therein or incorporated by reference therein, if any) provided to purchasers and prospective purchasers of the Notes, and shall include amendments and supplements thereto which may be prepared from time to time in accordance with this Agreement (other than any amendment or supplement that has been completely superseded by a later amendment or supplement).
6.13
“Qualified Institutional Buyer” shall have the meaning assigned to that term in Rule 144A under the Securities Act.
6.14
“Replacement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.9(i).
6.15
“Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.9(i).

10



6.16
“Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.9(i).
6.17
“Rule 144A” shall mean Rule 144A under the Securities Act.
6.18
“SEC” shall mean the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
6.19
“Securities Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
7.     General
7.1
Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, all notices under this Agreement to parties hereto shall be in writing and shall be effective when received at the address of the respective party set forth in the Addendum to this Agreement.
7.2
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions.
7.3
(a) Each party hereto agrees that any suit, action or proceeding brought by one party against the other in connection with or arising out of this Agreement or the Notes or the offer and sale of the Notes shall be brought solely in the United States federal courts located in the Borough of Manhattan or the courts of the State of New York located in the Borough of Manhattan. EACH OF THE DEALER AND THE ISSUER WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
(b) The Issuer and the Dealer each hereby irrevocably accepts and submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of each of the aforesaid courts in personam, generally and unconditionally, for itself and in respect of its properties, assets and revenues, with respect to any suit, action or proceeding in connection with or arising out of this Agreement or the Notes or the offer and sale of the Notes.
7.4
This Agreement may be terminated, at any time, by the Issuer, upon one business day’s prior notice to such effect to the Dealer, or by the Dealer upon one business day’s prior notice to such effect to the Issuer. Any such termination, however, shall not affect the obligations of the Issuer under Sections 3.7, 5 and 7.3 hereof or the respective representations, warranties, agreements, covenants, rights or responsibilities of the parties made or arising prior to the termination of this Agreement.
7.5
This Agreement is not assignable by either party hereto without the written consent of the other party; provided, however, that the Dealer may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any affiliate of the Dealer; provided that the Dealer shall not, absent the prior written consent of the Issuer, be released from (i) any liability to which the Dealer has theretofor become subject as a result of the Dealer’s prior breach of any of its covenants or representations hereunder or (ii) any liability or obligation arising out of any transaction initiated hereunder prior to such assignment . .
7.6
This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

11



7.7
This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto, and their respective permitted successors and assigns hereunder, and shall not be deemed to give any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim to any other person whatsoever.
7.8
The Issuer acknowledges and agrees that (i) purchases and sales, or placements, of the Notes pursuant to this Agreement, including the determination of any prices for the Notes and Dealer compensation, are arm's-length commercial transactions between the Issuer and the Dealer, (ii) in connection therewith and with the process leading to such transactions, the Dealer is acting solely as a principal and not the agent (except to the extent explicitly set forth herein) or fiduciary of the Issuer or any of its affiliates, (iii) the Dealer has not assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Issuer or any of its affiliates with respect to the offering contemplated hereby or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether the Dealer has advised or is currently advising the Issuer or any of its affiliates on other matters) or any other obligation to the Issuer or any of its affiliates except the obligations expressly set forth in this Agreement, (iv) the Issuer is capable of evaluating and understanding and understands and accepts the terms, risks and conditions of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (v) the Dealer and its affiliates may be engaged in a broad range of transactions that involve interests that differ from those of the Issuer and that the Dealer has no obligation to disclose any of those interests by virtue of any advisory or fiduciary relationship, (vi) the Dealer has not provided any legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, and (vii) the Issuer has consulted its own legal, accounting, regulatory, tax and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate. The Issuer agrees that it will not claim that the Dealer has rendered advisory services of any nature or respect, or owes a fiduciary or similar duty to the Issuer in connection with such transactions or the process leading thereto. Any review by the Dealer of the Issuer, the transactions contemplated hereby or other matters relating to such transactions shall be performed solely for the benefit of the Dealer and shall not be on behalf of the Issuer. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings (whether written or oral) between the Issuer and the Dealer with respect to the subject matter hereof. The Issuer hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims the Issuer may have against the Dealer with respect to any breach or alleged breach of fiduciary duty arising with respect to the matters addressed in this Agreement.
7.9
(i) The parties hereto agree that the Issuer may, in accordance with the terms of this Section 7.9, from time to time replace the party which is then acting as Issuing and Paying Agent (the “Current Issuing and Paying Agent”) with another party (such other party, the “Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent”), and enter into an agreement with the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent covering the provision of issuing and paying agency functions in respect of the Notes by the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent (the “Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement”) (any such replacement, a “Replacement”).
(ii) From and after the effective date of any Replacement, (A) to the extent that the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement provides that the Current Issuing and Paying Agent will continue to act in respect of Notes outstanding as of the effective date of such Replacement (the “Outstanding Notes”), then (i) the “Issuing and Paying Agent” for the Notes shall be deemed to be the Current Issuing and Paying Agent, in respect of the Outstanding Notes, and the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent, in respect of Notes issued on or after the Replacement, (ii) all references to the “Issuing and Paying Agent” hereunder shall be deemed to refer to the Current Issuing and Paying Agent in respect of the Outstanding Notes, and the

12



Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent in respect of Notes issued on or after the Replacement, and (iii) all references to the “Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement” hereunder shall be deemed to refer to the existing Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, in respect of the Outstanding Notes, and the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, in respect of Notes issued on or after the Replacement; and (B) to the extent that the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement does not provide that the Current Issuing and Paying Agent will continue to act in respect of the Outstanding Notes, then (i) the “Issuing and Paying Agent” for the Notes shall be deemed to be the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent, (ii) all references to the “Issuing and Paying Agent” hereunder shall be deemed to refer to the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent, and (iii) all references to the “Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement” hereunder shall be deemed to refer to the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement.
(iii) From and after the effective date of any Replacement, the Issuer shall not issue any Notes hereunder unless and until the Dealer shall have received: (a) a copy of the executed Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, (b) a copy of the executed Letter of Representations among the Issuer, the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent and DTC, (c) a copy of the executed Master Note authenticated by the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent and registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, (d) an amendment or supplement to the Private Placement Memorandum describing the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agent as the Issuing and Paying Agent for the Notes, and reflecting any other changes thereto necessary in light of the Replacement so that the Private Placement Memorandum, as amended or supplemented, satisfies the requirements of this Agreement, and (e) a legal opinion of counsel to the Issuer, addressed to the Dealer, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Dealer, as to (x) the due authorization, delivery, validity and enforceability of Notes issued pursuant to the Replacement Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement, and (y) such other matters as the Dealer may reasonably request.


13



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written.
SYSCO Corporation , as Issuer
BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC , as Dealer
By: /s/ Gregory Keyes
By: /s/ Joseph Russo
Name: Gregory Keyes
Name:   Joseph Russo
Title:   VP & Treasurer
Title:   Managing Director











14



Addendum
The following additional clauses shall apply to the Agreement and be deemed a part thereof.
1.
The other dealers referred to in clause (b) of Section 1.2 of the Agreement are JP Morgan Securities LLC and Goldman, Sachs & Co.
2.
The addresses of the respective parties for purposes of notices under Section 7.1 are as follows:
For the Issuer:    Sysco Corporation
Address: 1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston TX 77077    
Attention: Martin R. Gauthier, Assistant Treasurer
Telephone number: 281-584-1763
Fax number: 281-584-1792
For the Dealer:        BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC
Address:        101 Barclay Street, Third Floor     
Attention:        Institutional Money markets    
Telephone number:    (212) 815-5446 / 5680    
Fax number:        (212) 815-6452

15



Exhibit A
Form of Legend for Private Placement Memorandum and Notes
THE NOTES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAW, AND OFFERS AND SALES THEREOF MAY BE MADE ONLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH AN APPLICABLE EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS. BY ITS ACCEPTANCE OF A NOTE, THE PURCHASER WILL BE DEEMED TO REPRESENT THAT (I) IT HAS BEEN AFFORDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO INVESTIGATE MATTERS RELATING TO THE ISSUER AND THE NOTES, (II) IT IS NOT ACQUIRING SUCH NOTE WITH A VIEW TO ANY DISTRIBUTION THEREOF AND (III) IT IS EITHER (A)(1) AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR THAT IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 501(a)(1), (2), (3), or (7) UNDER THE ACT (AN “INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITED INVESTOR”) AND (2)(i) PURCHASING NOTES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT, (ii) A BANK (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 3(a)(2) OF THE ACT) OR A SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 3(a)(5)(A) OF THE ACT) ACTING IN ITS INDIVIDUAL OR FIDUCIARY CAPACITY OR (iii) A FIDUCIARY OR AGENT (OTHER THAN A U.S. BANK OR SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OR OTHER SUCH INSTITUTION) PURCHASING NOTES FOR ONE OR MORE ACCOUNTS EACH OF WHICH ACCOUNTS IS SUCH AN INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITED INVESTOR; OR (B) A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER (“QIB”) WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A UNDER THE ACT THAT IS ACQUIRING NOTES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT OR FOR ONE OR MORE ACCOUNTS, EACH OF WHICH ACCOUNTS IS A QIB; AND THE PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS AWARE THAT THE SELLER MAY RELY UPON THE EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5 OF THE ACT PROVIDED BY RULE 144A. BY ITS ACCEPTANCE OF A NOTE, THE PURCHASER THEREOF SHALL ALSO BE DEEMED TO AGREE THAT ANY RESALE OR OTHER TRANSFER THEREOF WILL BE MADE ONLY (A) IN A TRANSACTION EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE ACT, EITHER (1) TO THE ISSUER OR TO A PLACEMENT AGENT DESIGNATED BY THE ISSUER AS A PLACEMENT AGENT FOR THE NOTES (COLLECTIVELY, THE “PLACEMENT AGENTS”), NONE OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO ACQUIRE SUCH NOTE, (2) THROUGH A PLACEMENT AGENT TO AN INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITED INVESTOR OR A QIB, OR (3) TO A QIB IN A TRANSACTION THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144A AND (B) IN MINIMUM AMOUNTS OF $250,000.
 

16



Exhibit B
Further Provisions Relating to Indemnification
(a)
The Issuer agrees to reimburse each Indemnitee for all expenses (including reasonable fees and disbursements of internal and external counsel) as they are incurred by it in connection with investigating or defending any loss, claim, damage, liability or action in respect of which indemnification may be sought under Section 5 of the Agreement (whether or not it is a party to any such proceedings).
(b)
Promptly after receipt by an Indemnitee of notice of the existence of a Claim, such Indemnitee will, if a claim in respect thereof is to be made against the Issuer, notify the Issuer in writing of the existence thereof; provided that (i) the omission so to notify the Issuer will not relieve the Issuer from any liability which it may have hereunder unless and except to the extent it did not otherwise learn of such Claim and such failure results in the forfeiture by the Issuer of substantial rights and defenses, and (ii) the omission so to notify the Issuer will not relieve it from liability which it may have to an Indemnitee otherwise than on account of this indemnity agreement. In case any such Claim is made against any Indemnitee and it notifies the Issuer of the existence thereof, the Issuer will be entitled to participate therein, and to the extent that it may elect by written notice delivered to the Indemnitee, to assume the defense thereof, with counsel reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnitee; provided that if the defendants in any such Claim include both the Indemnitee and the Issuer, and the Indemnitee shall have concluded that there may be legal defenses available to it which are different from or additional to those available to the Issuer, the Issuer shall not have the right to direct the defense of such Claim on behalf of such Indemnitee, and the Indemnitee shall have the right to select separate counsel to assert such legal defenses on behalf of such Indemnitee. Upon receipt of notice from the Issuer to such Indemnitee of the Issuer’s election so to assume the defense of such Claim and approval by the Indemnitee of counsel, the Issuer will not be liable to such Indemnitee for expenses incurred thereafter by the Indemnitee in connection with the defense thereof (other than reasonable costs of investigation) unless (i) the Indemnitee shall have employed separate counsel in connection with the assertion of legal defenses in accordance with the proviso to the next preceding sentence (it being understood, however, that the Issuer shall not be liable for the expenses of more than one separate counsel (in addition to any local counsel in the jurisdiction in which any Claim is brought), approved by the Dealer, representing the Indemnitee who is party to such Claim), (ii) the Issuer shall not have employed counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnitee to represent the Indemnitee within a reasonable time after notice of existence of the Claim or (iii) the Issuer has authorized in writing the employment of counsel for the Indemnitee. The indemnity, reimbursement and contribution obligations of the Issuer hereunder shall be in addition to any other liability the Issuer may otherwise have to an Indemnitee and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successors, assigns, heirs and personal representatives of the Issuer and any Indemnitee. The Issuer agrees that without the Dealer’s prior written consent, it will not settle, compromise or consent to the entry of any judgment in any Claim in respect of which indemnification may be sought under the indemnification provision of the Agreement (whether or not the Dealer or any other Indemnitee is an actual or potential party to such Claim), unless such settlement, compromise or consent (i) includes an unconditional release of each Indemnitee from all liability arising out of such Claim and (ii) does not include a statement as to or an admission of fault, culpability or failure to act, by or on behalf of any Indemnitee.

17


Exhibit 10.7

Exhibit C
Statement of Terms for Interest – Bearing Commercial Paper Notes of Sysco Corporation
THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH BELOW ARE QUALIFIED TO THE EXTENT APPLICABLE BY THE TRANSACTION SPECIFIC [PRICING] [PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM] SUPPLEMENT (THE “SUPPLEMENT”) (IF ANY) SENT TO EACH PURCHASER AT THE TIME OF THE TRANSACTION.
1. General. (a) The obligations of the Issuer to which these terms apply (each a “Note”) are represented by one or more Master Notes (each, a “Master Note”) issued in the name of (or of a nominee for) The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), which Master Note includes the terms and provisions for the Issuer's Interest-Bearing Commercial Paper Notes that are set forth in this Statement of Terms, since this Statement of Terms constitutes an integral part of the Underlying Records as defined and referred to in the Master Note.
(b) “Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday or Sunday that is neither a legal holiday nor a day on which banking institutions are authorized or required by law, executive order or regulation to be closed in New York City and, with respect to LIBOR Notes (as defined below) is also a London Business Day. “London Business Day” means, a day, other than a Saturday or Sunday, on which dealings in deposits in U.S. dollars are transacted in the London interbank market.
2. Interest. (a) Each Note will bear interest at a fixed rate (a “Fixed Rate Note”) or at a floating rate (a “Floating Rate Note”).
(b) The Supplement sent to each holder of such Note will describe the following terms: (i) whether such Note is a Fixed Rate Note or a Floating Rate Note and whether such Note is an Original Issue Discount Note (as defined below); (ii) the date on which such Note will be issued (the “Issue Date”); (iii) the Stated Maturity Date (as defined below); (iv) if such Note is a Fixed Rate Note, the rate per annum at which such Note will bear interest, if any, and the Interest Payment Dates; (v) if such Note is a Floating Rate Note, the Base Rate, the Index Maturity, the Interest Reset Dates, the Interest Payment Dates and the Spread and/or Spread Multiplier, if any (all as defined below), and any other terms relating to the particular method of calculating the interest rate for such Note; and (vi) any other terms applicable specifically to such Note. “Original Issue Discount Note” means a Note which has a stated redemption price at the Stated Maturity Date that exceeds its Issue Price by more than a specified de minimis amount and which the Supplement indicates will be an “Original Issue Discount Note”.
(c) Each Fixed Rate Note will bear interest from its Issue Date at the rate per annum specified in the Supplement until the principal amount thereof is paid or made available for payment. Interest on each Fixed Rate Note will be payable on the dates specified in the Supplement (each an “Interest Payment Date” for a Fixed Rate Note) and on the Maturity Date (as defined below). Interest on Fixed Rate Notes will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.
If any Interest Payment Date or the Maturity Date of a Fixed Rate Note falls on a day that is not a Business Day, the required payment of principal, premium, if any, and/or interest will be payable on the next succeeding Business Day, and no additional interest will accrue in respect of the payment made on that next succeeding Business Day.

18



(d) The interest rate on each Floating Rate Note for each Interest Reset Period (as defined below) will be determined by reference to an interest rate basis (a “Base Rate”) plus or minus a number of basis points (one basis point equals one-hundredth of a percentage point) (the “Spread”), if any, and/or multiplied by a certain percentage (the “Spread Multiplier”), if any, until the principal thereof is paid or made available for payment. The Supplement will designate which of the following Base Rates is applicable to the related Floating Rate Note: (a) the CD Rate (a “CD Rate Note”), (b) the Commercial Paper Rate (a “Commercial Paper Rate Note”), (c) the Federal Funds Rate (a “Federal Funds Rate Note”), (d) LIBOR (a “LIBOR Note”), (e) the Prime Rate (a “Prime Rate Note”), (f) the Treasury Rate (a “Treasury Rate Note”) or (g) such other Base Rate as may be specified in such Supplement.
The rate of interest on each Floating Rate Note will be reset daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually (the “Interest Reset Period”). The date or dates on which interest will be reset (each an “Interest Reset Date”) will be, unless otherwise specified in the Supplement, in the case of Floating Rate Notes which reset daily, each Business Day, in the case of Floating Rate Notes (other than Treasury Rate Notes) that reset weekly, the Wednesday of each week; in the case of Treasury Rate Notes that reset weekly, the Tuesday of each week; in the case of Floating Rate Notes that reset monthly, the third Wednesday of each month; in the case of Floating Rate Notes that reset quarterly, the third Wednesday of March, June, September and December; and in the case of Floating Rate Notes that reset semiannually, the third Wednesday of the two months specified in the Supplement. If any Interest Reset Date for any Floating Rate Note is not a Business Day, such Interest Reset Date will be postponed to the next day that is a Business Day, except that in the case of a LIBOR Note, if such Business Day is in the next succeeding calendar month, such Interest Reset Date shall be the immediately preceding Business Day. Interest on each Floating Rate Note will be payable monthly, quarterly or semiannually (the “Interest Payment Period”) and on the Maturity Date. Unless otherwise specified in the Supplement, and except as provided below, the date or dates on which interest will be payable (each an “Interest Payment Date” for a Floating Rate Note) will be, in the case of Floating Rate Notes with a monthly Interest Payment Period, on the third Wednesday of each month; in the case of Floating Rate Notes with a quarterly Interest Payment Period, on the third Wednesday of March, June, September and December; and in the case of Floating Rate Notes with a semiannual Interest Payment Period, on the third Wednesday of the two months specified in the Supplement. In addition, the Maturity Date will also be an Interest Payment Date.
If any Interest Payment Date for any Floating Rate Note (other than an Interest Payment Date occurring on the Maturity Date) would otherwise be a day that is not a Business Day, such Interest Payment Date shall be postponed to the next day that is a Business Day, except that in the case of a LIBOR Note, if such Business Day is in the next succeeding calendar month, such Interest Payment Date shall be the immediately preceding Business Day. If the Maturity Date of a Floating Rate Note falls on a day that is not a Business Day, the payment of principal and interest will be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and no interest on such payment shall accrue for the period from and after such maturity.
Interest payments on each Interest Payment Date for Floating Rate Notes will include accrued interest from and including the Issue Date or from and including the last date in respect of which interest has been paid, as the case may be, to, but excluding, such Interest Payment Date. On the Maturity Date, the interest payable on a Floating Rate Note will include interest accrued to, but excluding, the Maturity Date. Accrued interest will be calculated by multiplying the principal amount of a Floating Rate Note by an accrued interest factor. This accrued interest factor will be

19



computed by adding the interest factors calculated for each day in the period for which accrued interest is being calculated. The interest factor (expressed as a decimal) for each such day will be computed by dividing the interest rate applicable to such day by 360, in the cases where the Base Rate is the CD Rate, Commercial Paper Rate, Federal Funds Rate, LIBOR or Prime Rate, or by the actual number of days in the year, in the case where the Base Rate is the Treasury Rate. The interest rate in effect on each day will be (i) if such day is an Interest Reset Date, the interest rate with respect to the Interest Determination Date (as defined below) pertaining to such Interest Reset Date, or (ii) if such day is not an Interest Reset Date, the interest rate with respect to the Interest Determination Date pertaining to the next preceding Interest Reset Date, subject in either case to any adjustment by a Spread and/or a Spread Multiplier.
The “Interest Determination Date” where the Base Rate is the CD Rate or the Commercial Paper Rate will be the second Business Day next preceding an Interest Reset Date. The Interest Determination Date where the Base Rate is the Federal Funds Rate or the Prime Rate will be the Business Day next preceding an Interest Reset Date. The Interest Determination Date where the Base Rate is LIBOR will be the second London Business Day next preceding an Interest Reset Date. The Interest Determination Date where the Base Rate is the Treasury Rate will be the day of the week in which such Interest Reset Date falls when Treasury Bills are normally auctioned. Treasury Bills are normally sold at auction on Monday of each week, unless that day is a legal holiday, in which case the auction is held on the following Tuesday or the preceding Friday. If an auction is so held on the preceding Friday, such Friday will be the Interest Determination Date pertaining to the Interest Reset Date occurring in the next succeeding week.
The “Index Maturity” is the period to maturity of the instrument or obligation from which the applicable Base Rate is calculated.
The “Calculation Date,” where applicable, shall be the earlier of (i) the tenth calendar day following the applicable Interest Determination Date or (ii) the Business Day preceding the applicable Interest Payment Date or Maturity Date.
All times referred to herein reflect New York City time, unless otherwise specified.
The Issuer shall specify in writing to the Issuing and Paying Agent which party will be the calculation agent (the “Calculation Agent”) with respect to the Floating Rate Notes. The Calculation Agent will provide the interest rate then in effect and, if determined, the interest rate which will become effective on the next Interest Reset Date with respect to such Floating Rate Note to the Issuing and Paying Agent as soon as the interest rate with respect to such Floating Rate Note has been determined and as soon as practicable after any change in such interest rate.
All percentages resulting from any calculation on Floating Rate Notes will be rounded to the nearest one hundred-thousandth of a percentage point, with five-one millionths of a percentage point rounded upwards. For example, 9.876545% (or .09876545) would be rounded to 9.87655% (or .0987655). All dollar amounts used in or resulting from any calculation on Floating Rate Notes will be rounded, in the case of U.S. dollars, to the nearest cent or, in the case of a foreign currency, to the nearest unit (with one-half cent or unit being rounded upwards).

20



CD Rate Notes
“CD Rate” means the rate on any Interest Determination Date for negotiable certificates of deposit having the Index Maturity as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) in “Statistical Release H.15(519), Selected Interest Rates” or any successor publication of the FRB (“H.15(519)”) under the heading “CDs (Secondary Market)”.
If the above rate is not published in H.15(519) by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, the CD Rate will be the rate on such Interest Determination Date set forth in the daily update of H.15(519), available through the world wide website of the FRB at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/Update, or any successor site or publication or other recognized electronic source used for the purpose of displaying the applicable rate (“H.15 Daily Update”) under the caption “CDs (Secondary Market)”.
If such rate is not published in either H.15(519) or H.15 Daily Update by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, the Calculation Agent will determine the CD Rate to be the arithmetic mean of the secondary market offered rates as of 10:00 a.m. on such Interest Determination Date of three leading nonbank dealers in negotiable U.S. dollar certificates of deposit in New York City selected by the Calculation Agent for negotiable U.S. dollar certificates of deposit of major United States money center banks of the highest credit standing in the market for negotiable certificates of deposit with a remaining maturity closest to the Index Maturity in the denomination of $5,000,000.
If the dealers selected by the Calculation Agent are not quoting as set forth above, the CD Rate will remain the CD Rate then in effect on such Interest Determination Date.
Commercial Paper Rate Notes
“Commercial Paper Rate” means the Money Market Yield (calculated as described below) of the rate on any Interest Determination Date for commercial paper having the Index Maturity, as published in H.15(519) under the heading “Commercial Paper-Nonfinancial”.
If the above rate is not published in H.15(519) by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, then the Commercial Paper Rate will be the Money Market Yield of the rate on such Interest Determination Date for commercial paper of the Index Maturity as published in H.15 Daily Update under the heading “Commercial Paper-Nonfinancial”.
If by 3:00 p.m. on such Calculation Date such rate is not published in either H.15(519) or H.15 Daily Update, then the Calculation Agent will determine the Commercial Paper Rate to be the Money Market Yield of the arithmetic mean of the offered rates as of 11:00 a.m. on such Interest Determination Date of three leading dealers of U.S. dollar commercial paper in New York City selected by the Calculation Agent for commercial paper of the Index Maturity placed for an industrial issuer whose bond rating is “AA,” or the equivalent, from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.
If the dealers selected by the Calculation Agent are not quoting as mentioned above, the Commercial Paper Rate with respect to such Interest Determination Date will remain the Commercial Paper Rate then in effect on such Interest Determination Date.

21



“Money Market Yield” will be a yield calculated in accordance with the following formula:     
Money Market Yield =
D X 360
X 100
360 - (D X M)
where “D” refers to the applicable per annum rate for commercial paper quoted on a bank discount basis and expressed as a decimal and “M” refers to the actual number of days in the interest period for which interest is being calculated.
Federal Funds Rate Notes
“Federal Funds Rate” means the rate on any Interest Determination Date for federal funds as published in H.15(519) under the heading “Federal Funds (Effective)” and displayed on Moneyline Telerate (or any successor service) on page 120 (or any other page as may replace the specified page on that service) (“Telerate Page 120”).
If the above rate does not appear on Telerate Page 120 or is not so published by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, the Federal Funds Rate will be the rate on such Interest Determination Date as published in H.15 Daily Update under the heading “Federal Funds/(Effective)”.
If such rate is not published as described above by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, the Calculation Agent will determine the Federal Funds Rate to be the arithmetic mean of the rates for the last transaction in overnight U.S. dollar federal funds arranged by each of three leading brokers of Federal Funds transactions in New York City selected by the Calculation Agent prior to 9:00 a.m. on such Interest Determination Date.
If the brokers selected by the Calculation Agent are not quoting as mentioned above, the Federal Funds Rate will remain the Federal Funds Rate then in effect on such Interest Determination Date.
LIBOR Notes
The London Interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) means, with respect to any Interest Determination Date, the rate for deposits in U.S. dollars having the Index Maturity that appears on the Designated LIBOR Page as of 11:00 a.m., London time, on such Interest Determination Date.
If no rate appears, LIBOR will be determined on the basis of the rates at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, on such Interest Determination Date at which deposits in U.S. dollars are offered to prime banks in the London interbank market by four major banks in such market selected by the Calculation Agent for a term equal to the Index Maturity and in principal amount equal to an amount that in the Calculation Agent’s judgment is representative for a single transaction in U.S. dollars in such market at such time (a “Representative Amount”). The Calculation Agent will request the principal London office of each of such banks to provide a quotation of its rate. If at least two such quotations are provided, LIBOR will be the arithmetic mean of such quotations. If fewer than two quotations are provided, LIBOR for such interest period will be the arithmetic mean of the rates quoted at approximately 11:00 a.m., in New York City, on such Interest Determination Date by three major banks in New York City, selected by the Calculation Agent, for loans in U.S. dollars to leading European banks, for a term equal to the Index Maturity and in a Representative Amount; provided, however, that if fewer than three banks so selected by the Calculation Agent are providing such quotations, the then existing LIBOR rate will remain in effect for such Interest Payment Period.

22



“Designated LIBOR Page” means the display designated as page “3750” on Moneyline Telerate (or such other page as may replace the 3750 page on that service or such other service or services as may be nominated by the British Bankers’ Association for the purposes of displaying London interbank offered rates for U.S. dollar deposits).

Prime Rate Notes
“Prime Rate” means the rate on any Interest Determination Date as published in H.15(519) under the heading “Bank Prime Loan”.
If the above rate is not published in H.15(519) prior to 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, then the Prime Rate will be the rate on such Interest Determination Date as published in H.15 Daily Update opposite the caption “Bank Prime Loan”.
If the rate is not published prior to 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date in either H.15(519) or H.15 Daily Update, then the Calculation Agent will determine the Prime Rate to be the arithmetic mean of the rates of interest publicly announced by each bank that appears on the Reuters Screen US PRIME1 Page (as defined below) as such bank’s prime rate or base lending rate as of 11:00 a.m., on that Interest Determination Date.
If fewer than four such rates referred to above are so published by 3:00 p.m. on the Calculation Date, the Calculation Agent will determine the Prime Rate to be the arithmetic mean of the prime rates or base lending rates quoted on the basis of the actual number of days in the year divided by 360 as of the close of business on such Interest Determination Date by three major banks in New York City selected by the Calculation Agent.
If the banks selected are not quoting as mentioned above, the Prime Rate will remain the Prime Rate in effect on such Interest Determination Date.
“Reuters Screen US PRIME1 Page” means the display designated as page “US PRIME1” on the Reuters Monitor Money Rates Service (or such other page as may replace the US PRIME1 page on that service for the purpose of displaying prime rates or base lending rates of major United States banks).
Treasury Rate Notes
“Treasury Rate” means:
(1) the rate from the auction held on the Interest Determination Date (the “Auction”) of direct obligations of the United States (“Treasury Bills”) having the Index Maturity specified in the Supplement under the caption “INVESTMENT RATE” on the display on Moneyline Telerate (or any successor service) on page 56 (or any other page as may replace that page on that service) (“Telerate Page 56”) or page 57 (or any other page as may replace that page on that service) (“Telerate Page 57”), or
(2) if the rate referred to in clause (1) is not so published by 3:00 p.m. on the related Calculation Date, the Bond Equivalent Yield (as defined below) of the rate for the applicable Treasury Bills as published in H.15 Daily Update, under the caption “U.S. Government Securities/Treasury Bills/Auction High”, or

23



(3) if the rate referred to in clause (2) is not so published by 3:00 p.m. on the related Calculation Date, the Bond Equivalent Yield of the auction rate of the applicable Treasury Bills as announced by the United States Department of the Treasury, or
(4) if the rate referred to in clause (3) is not so announced by the United States Department of the Treasury, or if the Auction is not held, the Bond Equivalent Yield of the rate on the particular Interest Determination Date of the applicable Treasury Bills as published in H.15(519) under the caption “U.S. Government Securities/Treasury Bills/Secondary Market”, or
(5) if the rate referred to in clause (4) not so published by 3:00 p.m. on the related Calculation Date, the rate on the particular Interest Determination Date of the applicable Treasury Bills as published in H.15 Daily Update, under the caption “U.S. Government Securities/Treasury Bills/Secondary Market”, or
(6) if the rate referred to in clause (5) is not so published by 3:00 p.m. on the related Calculation Date, the rate on the particular Interest Determination Date calculated by the Calculation Agent as the Bond Equivalent Yield of the arithmetic mean of the secondary market bid rates, as of approximately 3:30 p.m. on that Interest Determination Date, of three primary United States government securities dealers selected by the Calculation Agent, for the issue of Treasury Bills with a remaining maturity closest to the Index Maturity specified in the Supplement, or
(7) if the dealers so selected by the Calculation Agent are not quoting as mentioned in clause (6), the Treasury Rate in effect on the particular Interest Determination Date.
“Bond Equivalent Yield” means a yield (expressed as a percentage) calculated in accordance with the following formula:
Bond Equivalent Yield =
D X N
X 100
360 - (D X M)

where “D” refers to the applicable per annum rate for Treasury Bills quoted on a bank discount basis and expressed as a decimal, “N” refers to 365 or 366, as the case may be, and “M” refers to the actual number of days in the applicable Interest Reset Period.
3. Final Maturity. The Stated Maturity Date for any Note will be the date so specified in the Supplement, which shall be no later than 270 days from the date of issuance. On its Stated Maturity Date, or any date prior to the Stated Maturity Date on which the particular Note becomes due and payable by the declaration of acceleration, each such date being referred to as a Maturity Date, the principal amount of such Note, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, will be immediately due and payable.
4. Events of Default. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute an “Event of Default” with respect to a Note: (i) default in any payment of principal of or interest on such Note (including on a redemption thereof); (ii) the Issuer makes any compromise arrangement with its creditors generally including the entering into any form of moratorium with its creditors generally; (iii) a court having jurisdiction shall enter a decree or order for relief in respect of the Issuer in an involuntary case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, or there shall be appointed a receiver, administrator, liquidator, custodian, trustee or sequestrator (or similar officer) with respect to the whole or substantially the whole of the assets of the Issuer and any such decree, order or appointment is not removed, discharged or withdrawn within 60 days thereafter; or (iv) the Issuer shall commence a voluntary

24



case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, or consent to the entry of an order for relief in an involuntary case under any such law, or consent to the appointment of or taking possession by a receiver, administrator, liquidator, assignee, custodian, trustee or sequestrator (or similar official), with respect to the whole or substantially the whole of the assets of the Issuer or make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the principal of such Note (together with interest accrued and unpaid thereon) shall become, without any notice or demand, immediately due and payable.
5. Obligation Absolute. No provision of the Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement under which the Notes are issued shall alter or impair the obligation of the Issuer, which is absolute and unconditional, to pay the principal of and interest on each Note at the times, place and rate, and in the coin or currency, herein prescribed.
6. Supplement . Any term contained in the Supplement shall supercede any conflicting term contained herein.

 
 


25

Exhibit 10.16


2015-1 AMENDMENT
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
SYSCO CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(Effective June 29, 2013)


WHEREAS , Sysco Corporation (“ Sysco ”) sponsors and maintains the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June 29, 2013 (the “ Plan ”), to provide a select group of management and highly compensated employees within the meaning of Sections 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA (and therefore exempt from the requirements of Parts 2, 3 and 4 of Title I of ERISA as a “top hat” plan and eligible for the alternative method of compliance for reporting and disclosure which is available for such plans) the opportunity to defer a portion of their annual compensation from Sysco;
WHEREAS , pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Sysco (the “ Compensation Committee ”) may amend the Plan at any time by an instrument in writing;
WHEREAS , on May 21, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved a new administrative framework for the qualified and nonqualified retirement plans of Sysco; and
WHEREAS , the Compensation Committee has authorized the Senior Vice President—Human Resources and the Executive Vice President–Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary to execute amendments to the qualified and nonqualified retirement plans of Sysco on its behalf.
NOW, THEREFORE , the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of May 22, 2015. (Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Current Plan.)
1.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Claimant in its entirety to read as follows (new text in bold and italics ):

Claimant . “Claimant” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7. 5 .”

2.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Default Investment to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

3.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Fair Market Value to delete the references to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace them with references to the “ Investment Committee .”


1


Exhibit 10.16


4.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Investment to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

5.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to insert a new definition (“ Investment Committee ”) after the definition of “ Investment ” and before the definition of “ Lump Sum Distribution Option ,” to read as follows:

Investment Committee . “Investment Committee” means the Retirement Plan Investment Committee of Sysco, as appointed by the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco.”

6.
Paragraph (b) of Section 4.2 of the Plan (“ Deemed Investment of Deferrals and Company Matches ”) is hereby amended to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

7.
Article VII of the Plan (“ Administration ”) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows (new text in bold and italics ):
ARTICLE VII
ADMINISTRATION
7.1      Administrative Committee .
(a)      Administrative Committee Appointment     . The Administrative Committee shall be appointed by the Compensation Committee. Each Administrative Committee member shall serve until his or her resignation or removal. The Compensation Committee or its designee shall have the sole discretion to remove any one or more Administrative Committee members and to appoint one or more replacement or additional Administrative Committee members from time to time.
(b)      Administrative Committee Organization and Voting     . The organizational structure and voting responsibilities of the Administrative Committee shall be as set forth in the charter of the Administrative Committee.
(c)      Powers of the Administrative Committee . Except as provided under Section 7. 6 or unless otherwise reserved to the Compensation Committee or the Investment Committee , the Administrative Committee shall have the exclusive responsibility for the general administration of the Plan

2


Exhibit 10.16


according to the terms and provisions of the Plan and shall have all powers necessary to accomplish those purposes, including but not by way of limitation the right, power and authority:
(i)     to make rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan;
(ii)     to construe, interpret and apply all terms, provisions, conditions and limitations of the Plan;
(iii)     to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency that may appear in the Plan in the manner and to the extent it deems expedient to carry the Plan into effect for the greatest benefit of all parties at interest;
(iv)     to designate the persons eligible to become Participants and to establish the maximum and minimum amounts that may be elected to be deferred;
(v)     to determine all controversies relating to the administration of the Plan, including but not limited to: (A) differences of opinion arising between the Company and a Participant in accordance with Section 7. 5 , except when the difference of opinion relates to the entitlement to, the amount of or the method or timing of payment of a benefit affected by a Change of Control, in which event, such difference of opinion shall be decided by judicial action; and (B) any question it deems advisable to determine in order to promote the uniform administration of the Plan for the benefits of all parties at interest; and
(vi)     to delegate by written notice any plan administration duties of the Administrative Committee to such individual members of the Administrative Committee, individual employees of the Company, or groups of employees of the Company, as the Administrative Committee determines to be necessary or advisable to properly administer the Plan.
(d)      Committee Discretion . The Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee), in exercising any power or authority granted under this Plan, or in making any determination under this Plan shall perform or refrain from performing those acts pursuant to such authority using its sole discretion and judgment. By way of amplification and without limiting the foregoing, the Company specifically intends that the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee) have the greatest possible discretionary authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of

3


Exhibit 10.16


the Plan and to determine all questions concerning eligibility, participation and benefits. Any decision made by the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee) or any refraining to act or any act taken by the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee) in good faith shall be final and binding on all parties, subject to the provisions of Sections 7. 5 (a) through 7. 5 (c). The Administrative Committee’s (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee’s) decisions shall never be subject to de novo review. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrative Committee’s (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee’s) decisions, refraining to act or acting is to be subject to judicial review for those incidents occurring during the Plan Year in which a Change of Control occurs and during the next three (3) succeeding Plan Years.
7.2      Investment Committee .
(a)     Investment Committee Appointment . The Investment Committee shall be appointed by the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco. The Investment Committee shall consist of the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco and no fewer than three, but no more than eight, additional members. The members of the Investment Committee shall be selected from and shall include at least one representative of each of Sysco’s Human Resources, Finance, Financial Reporting, and Treasury functions. Each Investment Committee member shall serve until his or her resignation, removal, or termination of employment with Sysco or an affiliate. The highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco shall have the sole discretion to remove any one or more Investment Committee members and to appoint one or more replacement or additional Investment Committee members from time to time.
(b)     Investment Committee Organization and Voting     . The organizational structure and voting responsibilities of the Investment Committee shall be as set forth in the charter of the Investment Committee.
(c)      Powers of the Investment Committee . The Investment Committee shall have the exclusive responsibility to select the Investments among which a Participant may designate the deemed investment of the Participant’s Account, to select the Default Investment, and to establish,

4


Exhibit 10.16


maintain, and modify the procedures pursuant to which Participants allocate their Accounts among Investments.
(d)     Investment Committee Discretion . The Investment Committee, in exercising any power or authority granted under this Plan, or in making any determination under this Plan shall perform or refrain from performing those acts pursuant to such authority using its sole discretion and judgment. Any decision made by the Investment Committee or any refraining to act or any act taken by the Investment Committee in good faith shall be final and binding on all parties, subject to the provisions of Sections 7.5(a) through 7.5(c). The Investment Committee’s decisions shall never be subject to de novo review.
7.3      Reimbursement of Expenses . The Administrative Committee and the Investment Committee shall serve without compensation for their respective services but shall be reimbursed by Sysco for all expenses properly and actually incurred in the performance of their respective duties under the Plan.
7.4      Indemnification . To the extent permitted by law, members of the Board of Directors, members of the Compensation Committee, members of the Administrative Committee, members of the Investment Committee, employees of the Company, and all agents and representatives of the Company shall be indemnified by the Company, and saved harmless against any claims resulting from any action or conduct relating to the administration of the Plan, except claims arising from gross negligence, willful neglect or willful misconduct.
7.5      Claims Procedure . Any person who believes that he or she is being denied a benefit to which he or she is entitled under the Plan (referred to hereinafter as a “ Claimant ”) must file a written request for such benefit with the Administrative Committee; provided, however , that any claim involving entitlement to, the amount of or the method of or timing of payment of a benefit affected by a Change of Control shall be governed by Section 7. 1(c)(v)(A) . Such written request must set forth the Claimant’s claim and must be addressed to the Administrative Committee at Sysco’s principal office.
(a)     Initial Claims Decision . The Administrative Committee shall generally provide written notice to the Claimant of its decision within ninety (90) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) after the claim is filed with the Administrative Committee; provided, however , that the

5


Exhibit 10.16


Administrative Committee may have up to an additional ninety (90) days (or up to two (2) thirty (30) day periods for a Disability-based claim), to decide the claim, if the Administrative Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time to decide the claim, and the Administrative Committee advises the Claimant in writing of the need for an extension (including an explanation of the special circumstances requiring the extension) and the date on which it expects to decide the claim.
(b)     Appeals . A Claimant may appeal the Administrative Committee’s decision by submitting a written request for review to the Administrative Committee within sixty (60) days (or one hundred eighty (180) days for a Disability-based claim) after the earlier of receiving the denial notice or after expiration of the initial review period. Such written request must be addressed to the Administrative Committee at Sysco’s principal office. In connection with such request, the Claimant (and his or her authorized representative, if any) may review any pertinent documents upon which the denial was based and may submit issues and comments in writing for consideration by the Administrative Committee. If the Claimant’s request for review is not received within the earlier of sixty (60) days (or one hundred eighty (180) days for a Disability-based claim) after receipt of the denial or after expiration of the initial review period, the denial shall be final, and the Claimant shall be barred and estopped from challenging the Administrative Committee’s determination.
(c)     Decision Following Appeal . The Administrative Committee shall generally make its decision on the Claimant’s appeal in writing within sixty (60) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) following its receipt of the Claimant’s request for appeal; provided, however , that the Administrative Committee may have up to an additional sixty (60) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) to decide the claim, if the Administrative Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time to decide the claim and the Administrative Committee advises the Claimant in writing of the need for an extension (including an explanation of the special circumstances requiring the extension) and the date on which it expects to decide the claim. The Administrative Committee shall notify the Claimant of its decision on the Claimant’s appeal in writing, regardless of whether the decision is adverse.

6


Exhibit 10.16


(d)     Decisions Final; Procedures Mandatory . A decision on appeal by the Administrative Committee shall be binding and conclusive upon all persons, and completion of the claims procedures described in this Section 7. 5 shall be a mandatory precondition to commencement of any court proceeding in connection with the Plan by a person claiming rights under the Plan or by another person claiming rights through such a person. The Administrative Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the procedures described in this Section 7. 5 as a mandatory precondition to such an action.
7. 6      Compensation Committee Decisions . Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, any determination made with respect to the benefits or rights of an Executive Officer under this Plan shall not be made by the Administrative Committee but shall instead be made by the Compensation Committee, and each provision of the Plan otherwise governing such a determination shall be interpreted and construed to substitute the Compensation Committee for the Administrative Committee in such provision.    

8.
Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.



[ Signature Page Follows ]


7


Exhibit 10.16



IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Sysco Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed, effective as set forth herein.


SYSCO CORPORATION
 
 
By:
 
/s/ PAUL MOSKOWITZ

Name:
Title:
 
 PAUL MOSKOWITZ
Senior Vice President of HR

ATTEST:
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Erin Packwood
Name:
Title:
 
 Erin Packwood
Vice President Total Rewards


8

Exhibit 10.28


2015-1 AMENDMENT
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
SYSCO CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT SAVINGS PLAN
(Effective June 29, 2013)

WHEREAS , Sysco Corporation (“ Sysco ”) sponsors and maintains the Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Management Savings Plan, effective as of June 29, 2013 (the “ Plan ”), an unfunded plan of deferred compensation for eligible employees who are part of a select group of management and highly compensated employees within the meaning of Sections 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA (and therefore exempt from the requirements of Parts 2, 3 and 4 of Title I of ERISA as a “top hat” plan and eligible for the alternative method of compliance for reporting and disclosure which is available for such plans) to provide certain highly compensated management personnel a supplement to their retirement pay so as to retain their loyalty and to offer them a further incentive to maintain and increase their standard of performance;
WHEREAS , pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Sysco (the “ Compensation Committee ”) may amend the Plan at any time by an instrument in writing;
WHEREAS , on May 21, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved a new administrative framework for the qualified and nonqualified retirement plans of Sysco; and
WHEREAS , the Compensation Committee has authorized the Senior Vice President—Human Resources and the Executive Vice President–Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary to execute amendments to the qualified and nonqualified retirement plans of Sysco on its behalf.    
NOW, THEREFORE , the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of May 22, 2015. (Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Current Plan.)
1.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Claimant in its entirety to read as follows (new text in bold and italics ):

Claimant . “Claimant” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8. 5 .”

2.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Default Investment to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

3.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Fair Market Value to delete the references to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace them with references to the “ Investment Committee .”

1


Exhibit 10.28


4.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to revise the definition of Investment to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

5.
Article I of the Plan (“ Definitions ”) is hereby amended to insert a new definition (“ Investment Committee ”) after the definition of “ Investment ” and before the definition of “ Lump Sum Distribution Option ,” to read as follows:
Investment Committee . “Investment Committee” means the Retirement Plan Investment Committee of Sysco, as appointed by the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco.”

6.
Paragraph (b) of Section 5.4 of the Plan (“ Deemed Investment of Deferrals and Company Contributions ”) is hereby amended to delete the reference to the “ Administrative Committee ” and replace it with a reference to the “ Investment Committee .”

7.
Article VIII of the Plan (“ Administration ”) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows (new text in bold and italics ):
ARTICLE VII
ADMINISTRATION
8.1     Administrative Committee .
(a)      Administrative Committee Appointment     . The Administrative Committee shall be appointed by the Compensation Committee. Each Administrative Committee member shall serve until his or her resignation or removal. The Compensation Committee or its designee shall have the sole discretion to remove any one or more Administrative Committee members and to appoint one or more replacement or additional Administrative Committee members from time to time.
(b)      Administrative Committee Organization and Voting     . The organizational structure and voting responsibilities of the Administrative Committee shall be as set forth in the charter of the Administrative Committee.
(c)      Powers of the Administrative Committee . Except as provided under Section s 8. 6 and 8.7 or unless otherwise reserved to the Compensation Committee or the Investment Committee , the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) shall have the exclusive responsibility for the general administration of the Plan according to the

2


Exhibit 10.28


terms and provisions of the Plan and shall have all powers necessary to accomplish those purposes, including but not by way of limitation the right, power and authority:
(i)     to make rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan;
(ii)     to construe, interpret and apply all terms, provisions, conditions and limitations of the Plan;
(iii)     to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency that may appear in the Plan in the manner and to the extent it deems expedient to carry the Plan into effect for the greatest benefit of all parties at interest;
(iv)     to designate the persons eligible to become Participants and to establish the maximum and minimum amounts that may be elected to be deferred;
(v)     to determine all controversies relating to the administration of the Plan, including but not limited to: (A) differences of opinion arising between the Company and a Participant in accordance with Section 8. 5 , except when the difference of opinion relates to the entitlement to, the amount of or the method or timing of payment of a benefit affected by a Change of Control, in which event, such difference of opinion shall be decided by judicial action; and (B) any question it deems advisable to determine in order to promote the uniform administration of the Plan for the benefits of all parties at interest; and
(vi)     to delegate by written notice any plan administration duties of the Administrative Committee to such individual members of the Administrative Committee, individual employees of the Company, or groups of employees of the Company, as the Administrative Committee determines to be necessary or advisable to properly administer the Plan.
(d)      Committee Discretion . The Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer), in exercising any power or authority granted under this Plan, or in making any determination under this Plan shall perform or refrain from performing those acts pursuant to such authority using its sole discretion and judgment. By way of amplification and without limiting the foregoing, the Company specifically intends that the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee, Sysco’s Chief

3


Exhibit 10.28


Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) have the greatest possible discretionary authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the Plan and to determine all questions concerning eligibility, participation and benefits. Any decision made by the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) or any refraining to act or any act taken by the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) in good faith shall be final and binding on all parties, subject to the provisions of Sections 8. 5 (a) through 8. 5 (c). The Administrative Committee’s (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee’s, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer’s and/or Chief Operating Officer’s) decisions shall never be subject to de novo review. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrative Committee’s (or, as applicable, the Compensation Committee’s, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer’s and/or Chief Operating Officer’s) decisions, refraining to act or acting is to be subject to judicial review for those incidents occurring during the Plan Year in which a Change of Control occurs and during the next three (3) succeeding Plan Years.
8.2     Investment Committee .
(a)     Investment Committee Appointment . The Investment Committee shall be appointed by the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco. The Investment Committee shall consist of the highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco and no fewer than three, but no more than eight, additional members. The members of the Investment Committee shall be selected from and shall include at least one representative of each of Sysco’s Human Resources, Finance, Financial Reporting, and Treasury functions. Each Investment Committee member shall serve until his or her resignation, removal, or termination of employment with Sysco or an affiliate. The highest ranking Human Resources executive of Sysco shall have the sole discretion to remove any one or more Investment Committee members and to appoint one or more replacement or additional Investment Committee members from time to time.
(b)     Investment Committee Organization and Voting     . The organizational structure and voting responsibilities of the Investment Committee shall be as set forth in the charter of the Investment Committee.

4


Exhibit 10.28


(c)      Powers of the Investment Committee . The Investment Committee shall have the exclusive responsibility to select the Investments among which a Participant may designate the deemed investment of the Participant’s Account, to select the Default Investment, and to establish, maintain, and modify the procedures pursuant to which Participants allocate their Accounts among Investments.
(d)     Investment Committee Discretion . The Investment Committee, in exercising any power or authority granted under this Plan, or in making any determination under this Plan shall perform or refrain from performing those acts pursuant to such authority using its sole discretion and judgment. Any decision made by the Investment Committee or any refraining to act or any act taken by the Investment Committee in good faith shall be final and binding on all parties, subject to the provisions of Sections 8.5(a) through 8.5(c). The Investment Committee’s decisions shall never be subject to de novo review.
8. 3      Reimbursement of Expenses . The Administrative Committee and the Investment Committee shall serve without compensation for their respective services but shall be reimbursed by Sysco for all expenses properly and actually incurred in the performance of their respective duties under the Plan.
8. 4      Indemnification . To the extent permitted by law, members of the Board of Directors, members of the Compensation Committee, members of the Administrative Committee, members of the Investment Committee, employees of the Company, and all agents and representatives of the Company shall be indemnified by the Company, and saved harmless against any claims resulting from any action or conduct relating to the administration of the Plan, except claims arising from gross negligence, willful neglect or willful misconduct.
8 .5      Claims Procedure . Any person who believes that he or she is being denied a benefit to which he or she is entitled under the Plan (referred to hereinafter as a “ Claimant ”) must file a written request for such benefit with the Administrative Committee; provided, however , that any claim involving entitlement to, the amount of or the method of or timing of payment of a benefit affected by a Change of Control shall be governed by Section 8. 1(c)(v)(A) . Such written request must set forth the Claimant’s claim and must be addressed to the Administrative Committee at Sysco’s principal office.

5


Exhibit 10.28


(a)     Initial Claims Decision . The Administrative Committee shall generally provide written notice to the Claimant of its decision within ninety (90) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) after the claim is filed with the Administrative Committee; provided, however , that the Administrative Committee may have up to an additional ninety (90) days (or up to two (2) thirty (30) day periods for a Disability-based claim), to decide the claim, if the Administrative Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time to decide the claim, and the Administrative Committee advises the Claimant in writing of the need for an extension (including an explanation of the special circumstances requiring the extension) and the date on which it expects to decide the claim.
(b)     Appeals . A Claimant may appeal the Administrative Committee’s decision by submitting a written request for review to the Administrative Committee within sixty (60) days (or one hundred eighty (180) days for a Disability-based claim) after the earlier of receiving the denial notice or after expiration of the initial review period. Such written request must be addressed to the Administrative Committee at Sysco’s principal office. In connection with such request, the Claimant (and his or her authorized representative, if any) may review any pertinent documents upon which the denial was based and may submit issues and comments in writing for consideration by the Administrative Committee. If the Claimant’s request for review is not received within the earlier of sixty (60) days (or one hundred eighty (180) days for a Disability-based claim) after receipt of the denial or after expiration of the initial review period, the denial shall be final, and the Claimant shall be barred and estopped from challenging the Administrative Committee’s determination.
(c)     Decision Following Appeal . The Administrative Committee shall generally make its decision on the Claimant’s appeal in writing within sixty (60) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) following its receipt of the Claimant’s request for appeal; provided, however , that the Administrative Committee may have up to an additional sixty (60) days (or forty-five (45) days for a Disability-based claim) to decide the claim, if the Administrative Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time to decide the claim and the Administrative Committee advises the Claimant in writing of the need for an extension (including an explanation of the special circumstances requiring the extension) and the date on which it expects to decide the claim. The Administrative

6


Exhibit 10.28


Committee shall notify the Claimant of its decision on the Claimant’s appeal in writing, regardless of whether the decision is adverse.
(d)     Decisions Final; Procedures Mandatory . A decision on appeal by the Administrative Committee shall be binding and conclusive upon all persons, and completion of the claims procedures described in this Section 8. 5 shall be a mandatory precondition to commencement of any court proceeding in connection with the Plan by a person claiming rights under the Plan or by another person claiming rights through such a person. The Administrative Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the procedures described in this Section 8. 5 as a mandatory precondition to such an action.
8. 6      Delegation of Authority by the Compensation Committee . The Compensation Committee hereby expressly delegates to the Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer of Sysco the Compensation Committee’s discretionary authority with respect to the following: (i) designating employees as participants in the Plan (subject to the limitations set forth in the second sentence of Section 2.1); (ii) establishing additional eligibility requirements for participation in the Plan; and (iii) excluding an otherwise eligible employee from participating in the Plan; provided, however, that the Chief Executive Officer’s and/or Chief Operating Officer’s discretionary authority under this Plan shall not apply to the extent such decision is with respect to an Executive Officer.
8. 7      Compensation Committee Decisions . Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, any determination made with respect to the benefits or rights of an Executive Officer under this Plan shall not be made by the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) but shall instead be made by the Compensation Committee, and each provision of the Plan otherwise governing such a determination shall be interpreted and construed to substitute the Compensation Committee for the Administrative Committee (or, as applicable, Sysco’s Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief Operating Officer) in such provision.”    

8.
Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.

[ Signature Page Follows ]


7


Exhibit 10.28



IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Sysco Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed, effective as set forth herein.


SYSCO CORPORATION
 
 
By:
 
/s/ PAUL MOSKOWITZ
Name:
Title:
 
 PAUL MOSKOWITZ
Senior Vice President of HR

ATTEST:
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Erin Packwood
Name:
Title:
 
 Erin Packwood
Vice President Total Rewards


8


Exhibit 10.56

Summary of Current Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors
(As of August 24, 2015)

The following summarizes, as of August 24, 2015, the current cash compensation and benefits received by the Company’s non-employee directors. The following is a summary of existing arrangements, and does not provide any additional rights.

Retainer Fees

The Company pays each non-employee director a base retainer of $100,000 per year (the “Base Retainer”). Non-employee directors who serve as committee chairpersons receive annual additional amounts as follows:

Audit Committee Chair
$25,000
Compensation Committee Chair
$20,000
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair
$20,000
Finance Committee Chair
$20,000
Sustainability Committee Chair
$15,000

In November 2013, the Board selected Jackie M. Ward as its Non-Executive Chairman. In addition to the compensation received by all non-employee directors, Ms. Ward receives an additional annual retainer of $475,000, paid quarterly, for her service as Non-Executive Chairman.

Directors Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors may defer all or a portion of their annual retainer, including additional fees paid to committee chairpersons and any additional retainer fee paid to the non-executive Chairman of the Board and/or Lead Director, under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. With respect to amounts deferred, non-employee directors may choose from a variety of investment options, including Moody’s Average Corporate Bond Yield plus 1% for amounts deferred or matched prior to July 2, 2008 and Moody’s Average Corporate Bond Yield without the additional 1% for amounts deferred or matched on or after July 2, 2008. Such deferred amounts will be credited with investment gains or losses until the non-employee director’s retirement from the Board or until the occurrence of certain other events.

Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan

The 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan authorizes grants of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and elected shares in lieu of all or a portion of the Base Retainer and any additional retainer fee paid to the non-executive Chairman of the Board and/or Lead Director for his or her service in such capacity and any fees paid to a committee chairman for his or her service in such capacity.
 
Restricted Stock . Under the Plan, the Board is authorized to issue restricted stock and restricted stock units to non-employee directors on terms set forth in the Plan.

Elected Shares . The Plan permits each non-employee director to elect to receive all or a portion of his or her annual retainer (including any additional retainer fee paid to the non-executive Chairman of the Board and/or Lead Director for his or her service in such capacity and any fees paid to a committee chairman for his or her service in such capacity) in Common Stock. The Company will provide a matching grant with respect to up to 50% of the Base Retainer that a non-employee director elects to receive in Common Stock (the “Match Eligible Shares”). The matching grant shall be equal to 50% of the Match Eligible Shares that a non-employee director receives. With respect to the remaining portion of the Base Retainer and any additional retainer fee paid to the non-executive Chairman of the Board and/or Lead Director for his or her service in such capacity and any fees paid to a committee chairman for his or her service in such capacity, a non-employee director may elect to receive Common Stock, but it is not eligible for the matching grant described in this paragraph.

The Board does not currently grant annual stock option or restricted stock unit awards under this Plan.

2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan

A non-employee director may elect to defer receipt of all or any portion of any shares of common stock issued under the Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, whether such shares are to be issued as a grant of restricted stock, elected shares or matching grants, or upon the vesting of a restricted stock unit grant. Generally, the receipt of stock may be deferred until the earliest to occur of the death of the non-employee director, the date on which the non-employee director ceases to be a director of Sysco, or a change of control of Sysco.

Reimbursement for Expenses

All non-employee directors are entitled to receive reimbursements of expenses for all services as a director, including committee participation or special assignments. This includes reimbursement for non-commercial air travel in connection with Sysco business, subject to specified maximums, provided that amounts related to the purchase price of an aircraft or fractional interest in an aircraft are not reimbursable and any portion of the reimbursement that relates to insurance, maintenance and other non-incremental costs is limited to a maximum annual amount.

The Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, the 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan and the 2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan, have been filed as exhibits to the Company’s filings pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Additional information regarding these plans is included in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement.


[SYSCO LETTERHEAD]
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
April 1, 2015
Mr. R. Chris Kreidler
1390 Enclave Parkway
Houston, Texas 77077
Dear Chris:
This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) outlines the details of your voluntary resignation from employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sysco Corporation (the “Company”).
Timing and Responsibilities: You will continue to serve as Executive President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company through August 31, 2015, reporting to me. From September 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, you will continue to serve as Executive Vice President of the Company with your duties directed by me. Your resignation will become effective on December 31, 2015 (the “Resignation Date”).
Compensation:
Your annual base salary will remain $736,000 through your Resignation Date. You will not be eligible for a merit increase in 2015.
You will not be eligible for a FY2016 annual incentive award.
You will not be eligible for any CPU award payouts other than with respect to any earned FY2013 - FY2015 Cash Performance Unit (CPU) Award, which will be payable to you at the normal time (August, 2015).
Until the Resignation Date, your outstanding stock option and RSU grants will continue to vest according to their original schedules. Vested stock options are exercisable according to the terms and conditions of those awards. All Sysco stock sales and purchases are subject to blackout period restrictions and required approvals.
You will not be eligible for any new long-term incentive grants in FY2016.
You will maintain your eligibility for a merger incentive award (subject to
approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors). The recoupment requirement for this award will be waived at the time of payment contingent upon your execution of a customary release of claims in favor of the Company.
Commuting Expenses: The Company will reimburse you for commuting expenses between New York and Houston incurred between July 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Reimbursable commuting expenses include airfare, car rental, personal vehicle mileage, hotel or other lodging expenses, and airport parking. All commuting expenses incurred under this arrangement shall be in accordance with Sysco’s Travel and Expense Policy.
Mr. R. Chris Kreidler
April 1, 2015
Page 2
Special COBRA Benefit: You will be eligible for the Special COBRA Benefit, contingent upon your compliance with the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, your timely execution, without revocation, of a General Release (the “Release”) which will be provided to you on the Resignation Date:
Company-Subsidized Health Coverage: Provided that you and/or your eligible dependents, if any, are participating in Sysco’s group health, dental and vision plans on the Resignation Date and elect on a timely basis to continue that participation in some or all of the offered plans through the federal law commonly known as “COBRA,” Sysco will pay the entire premium cost of that participation (the “Company-Subsidized Health Coverage”). You shall continue to be eligible for the Company-Subsidized Health Coverage until the earlier to occur of (1) the date 12 (twelve) months after your Resignation Date or (2) the date you are eligible to enroll in the health, dental and/or vision plans of another employer; provided, however, that your participation is dependent on you and/or your dependents continuing to be eligible to participate in Sysco’s offered plans through COBRA. You agree to notify Sysco promptly if you are eligible to enroll in the plans of another employer or if you or any of your dependents cease to be eligible to continue participation in Company plans through COBRA. You will receive separate information regarding your COBRA benefits.
To receive the Company-Subsidized Health Coverage, you must execute the Release on a timely basis. You will have twenty-one (21) days to consider the Release. As described more fully in the Release, you have seven days following the date you execute the Release to revoke your signature by delivering a written revocation to Adam Skorecki, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at fax number (281) 5842510. The Release will not become effective until you sign it and the seven-day revocation period has passed without you having exercised your right to revoke your signature. You will have until January 31, 2016 to execute the Release and if you do not execute the Release or if you revoke the Release after you execute it, this Agreement will be null and void. You are advised to consult an attorney prior to executing the Release. Please also note that the Release contains provisions regarding non-disparagement of the Company and its officers, employees, directors, products and services and your ongoing cooperation with transition efforts and other important matters related to your employment.
Your continued eligibility for the Special COBRA Benefits is contingent upon your compliance with all ongoing obligations to the Company through December 31, 2015, including those regarding the use and protection of confidential information, restrictions on solicitation of employees and customers, assignment of inventions and intellectual property, restrictions on competitive activities and compliance with the Sysco Code of Conduct.

Mr. R. Chris Kreidler
April 1, 2015
Page 3
Post-Employment Restrictions : Your receipt of the COBRA Benefit is also subject to your adherence to your ongoing obligations to the Company regarding intellectual property, confidential information to which you had access by virtue of your employment, restrictions on competitive activities, and non-solicitation of employees and customers, including, but not limited to the restrictions contained in any existing noncompetition agreement with the Company. Your breach of the restrictions on your post-employment activities as determined by a final, non-appealable judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction entitles Sysco to cease any remaining benefits owed to you under this Agreement. Moreover, should you fail to comply with restrictions on your post-employment activities, you agree and acknowledge that Sysco will be entitled to recoupment of the COBRA Benefit paid to you.
Other Compensation and Benefits: All other compensation and benefits will be governed by the terms of the applicable plans and programs. Except as provided herein, for the duration of your employment, you remain eligible for compensation and benefits under all existing plans and programs that you currently participate in, including, but not limited to, contribution payments under the Sysco Management Savings Plan. You will be paid for any earned but unused vacation remaining as of the Resignation Date, and you also will be reimbursed for eligible business expenses that you incurred during the course of your employment per Company policy.
No provision of this Agreement may be amended, modified, waived or discharged unless such amendment, waiver, modification or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by you and the Company. Nothing herein shall modify the at-will nature of your employment. You or the Company may end employment at any time for any lawful reason.
Please sign below and return an executed original of this Agreement to me by April 10, 2015 to acknowledge your understanding of the terms and conditions above.
Sincerely,
/s/ William J. DeLaney
William J. DeLaney
President and Chief Executive Officer

AGREED:


I have read, understand, and agree to the terms and conditions set forth in the letter agreement from Bill DeLaney dated April 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”).

/s/ R. Chris Kreidler        4/1/15
R. Chris Kreidler    Date

cc:    Russell Libby, Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs & Chief Legal Officer
Paul Moskowitz – Senior Vice President, Human Resources

Mr. R. Chris Kreidler
April 1, 2015
Page 4
Erin Packwood – Vice President, Total Rewards
Connie S. Brooks – Director, Executive and Stock Based Programs












 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 12.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal Year
(dollars in thousands)
June 27, 2015
 
June 28, 2014
 
June 29, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
July 2, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings before income taxes
$
1,008,147
 
$
1,475,624
 
$
1,547,455
 
$
1,784,002
 
$
1,827,454
 
Add: Fixed charges
 
281,756
 
 
147,922
 
 
153,840
 
 
154,965
 
 
151,990
 
Subtract: Capitalized interest
 
866
 
 
1,097
 
 
4,242
 
 
20,816
 
 
13,887
 
Total
$
1,289,037
 
$
1,622,449
 
$
1,697,053
 
$
1,918,151
 
$
1,965,557
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
$
254,807
 
$
123,741
 
$
128,495
 
$
113,396
 
$
118,267
 
Capitalized interest
 
866
 
 
1,097
 
 
4,242
 
 
20,816
 
 
13,887
 
Rent expense interest factor
 
26,083
 
 
23,084
 
 
21,103
 
 
20,753
 
 
19,836
 
Total
$
281,756
 
$
147,922
 
$
153,840
 
$
154,965
 
$
151,990
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
 
4.6
 
 
11.0
 
 
11.0
 
 
12.4
 
 
12.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) For the purpose of calculating this ratio, “earnings” consist of earnings before income taxes and fixed charges (exclusive of interest capitalized). “Fixed charges” consist of interest expense, capitalized interest and the estimated interest portion of rents.




Exhibit 21.1
SYSCO CORPORATION
DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES, DIVISIONS AND DBA's
As of August 24, 2015




SUBSIDIARY NAME
DIVISIONS/DBA NAME
JURISDICTION
A La California, LLC
 
Delaware
A. M. Briggs, Inc.
Metropolitan Poultry
Delaware
Arnotts (Fruit) Limited
 
United Kingdom
Bahamas Food Holdings Limited
 
Bahamas
Bahamas Food Services Limited
 
Bahamas
Buckhead Beef Company
Central Florida Foodservice -
Royalty Foods -
Central Seafood -
Seafood Brokers -
Buckhead Beef of New Jersey -
Buckhead Beef Rhode Island -
Buckhead Beef Northeast -
Buckhead Beef of Florida -
Buckhead Beef
Buckhead Beef North California -
Trinity Seafood -
Delaware
BuzzTable, Inc.
 
Delaware
Conan Foods Inc.
 
Canada
Contract Administrative Services, Inc.
Texas Contract Administrative Services, Inc.
Delaware
Corporation Frionet S.A.
 
Costa Rica
Crossgar Foodservice Limited
 
United Kingdom
Crossgar Frozen Foods Limited
 
United Kingdom
Crossgar Meats Limited
 
United Kingdom
Crossgar Poultry Limited
 
United Kingdom
Dan O'Sullivan (Turners Cross) Cork
 
Ireland
Dust Bowl City, LLC
 
Texas
Economy Foods, Inc.
Facciola Meat Company
Newport Meat
California
Enclave Properties, LLC
Sysco Enclave Properties, LLC
Delaware
European Imports, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freedman Food Service of Dallas, Inc.
 
Texas
Freedman Food Service of Denver, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freedman Food Service of San Antonio, L.P.
Texas Meat Purveyors
Texas
Freedman Food Service, Inc.
 
Texas
Freedman Meats, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freedman-KB, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freshpoint Arizona, Inc.
European Imports
Freshpoint - Phoenix
Delaware
Freshpoint Atlanta, Inc.
Freshpoint of Atlanta
Mitt Parker
Georgia
Freshpoint California, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freshpoint Central California, Inc.
Freshpoint of Central California
Freshpoint - Central California
Freshpoint - Northern California
Piranha Produce
Delaware
Freshpoint Central Florida, Inc.
Freshpoint - Jacksonville
Freshpoint Southwest Florida
Garden Gourmet Specialties
Red's Market
Red's Market - Orlando
Red's Market - Tampa
Florida
Freshpoint Connecticut, LLC
Freshpoint - Hartford
The Fowler & Huntting Company
Delaware
Freshpoint Dallas, Inc.
Freshpoint Value Added Services
Delaware
Freshpoint Denver, Inc.
 
Colorado
Freshpoint Las Vegas, Inc.
 
Delaware
Freshpoint North Carolina, Inc.
Freshpoint Charlotte
Freshpoint of Charlotte
Freshpoint Raleigh
Freshpoint Nashville, Inc.
Freshpoint of Raleigh
Tennessee
Freshpoint North Florida, Inc.
Freshpoint Value Added Services
East Coast Fruit Company
Freshpoint Southern Georgia
Freshpoint Jacksonville
Freshpoint Savannah
Movsovitz of Georgia
Florida
Freshpoint Oklahoma City, LLC
Freshpoint Arkansas
Freshpoint Tulsa
Delaware
Freshpoint Pompano Real Estate, LLC
 
Delaware
Freshpoint Puerto Ricco, LLC
 
Puerto Rico
Freshpoint San Francisco, Inc.
Freshpoint - San Francisco
California
Freshpoint South Florida, Inc.
A-One-A Produce and Dairy
Florida
Freshpoint South Texas, LP
City Produce
Freshpoint - Harlingen
Freshpoint - San Antonio
Delaware
Freshpoint Southern California, Inc.
The Produce Hunter
G & G Produce Company
California
Freshpoint Tomato, LLC
Freshpoint Value Added
Nashville Tomato
Freshpoint Nashville
Delaware
Freshpoint Vancouver, Ltd.
Freshpoint Fresh cuts
Freshpoint - Nanaimo
Freshpoint - Vancouver
Pacific Produce - Nanaimo
Freshpoint Foodservice
Canada
Freshpoint, Inc.
 
Delaware
Fulton Provision CO.
 
Delaware
G. Bell & Sons Limited
 
United Kingdom
Goldberg And Solovy Foods, Inc.
 
California
Grupo Enclave, S.A.
 
Costa Rica
Guest Packaging LLC
 
Delaware
Guest Supply Asia, Limited
 
Hong Kong
Hillfarm Turkeys Limited
 
United Kingdom
Houston Meat & Seafood, LLC
 
Delaware
Iowa Premium Beef, LLC
 
Iowa
Keelings & Curleys Distribution Limited
 
Ireland
Keelings Farm Fresh
 
Ireland
California Corporation
 
Delaware
Leapset Sri Lanka PVT Ltd
 
Sri Lanka
Liquid Assets Limited
 
Bahamas
Malcolm Meats Company
Imperial Seafood & Shellfish CO.
Delaware
Manhatten Food Co. Limited
 
United Kingdom
Mayca Autoservicios, S.A.
 
Costa Rica
Mayca Distribuidores S.A.
 
Costa Rica
Pallas Foods
 
Ireland
Renta Californiamiones S.A.
 
Costa Rica
Restaurant Of Tomorrow, Inc.
 
Delaware
Scorpion Corporation I, Inc.
 
Delaware
Scorpion Company II, LLC
 
Delaware
Seaview Farm Produce Company
 
Ireland
SFS CA I, LP
 
Canada
SFS CA II, LP
 
Canada
SFS GP I, Inc.
 
Canada
SFS GP II, Inc.
 
Canada
Shenzhen Guest Supply Trading CO., Limited
 
Hong Kong
SMS Bermuda Holdings
 
Bermuda
SMS Global Holdings Sarl
 
Luxembourg
SMS GPC International Limited
 
Hong Kong
SMS GPC International Resources Limited
 
Hong Kong
SMS International Resources Ireland
 
Ireland
SMS Lux Holdings LLC
 
Delaware
Specialty Meat Holdings, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Albany, LLC
Sysco Food Services of Albany, LLC
Delaware
Sysco Asian Foods, Inc.
Asian Foods
Delaware
Sysco Atlanta, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Baltimore, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Baraboo, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Boston, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco CA Holdings Sarl
 
Luxembourg
Sysco Canada, Inc.
Allard Fruits and Vegetables
Allard Fruits & Legumes
Centre de Redistribution Sysco de Kingston
Distagro
Dytran Transport
En Gros Pierre
En Gros Pierre Fish & Seafood
En Gros Pierre Poissons et Fruits Delaware Mer
Fin's Seafood Distributors
Frank & Dino
Frank et Dino Aliments
Honeyman's Beef Purveyors
Importation Altimentaire Mega
J. J. Derma Meats
Les Viandes St-Laurent
Lapointe Fish Ltd.
Martha's Garden
Pronamic Distribution
Sysco Calgary
Sysco Calgary Redistribution Centre
Sysco Canda
Sysco Central Ontario
Sysco Edmonton
Sysco Fine Meats of Ontario
Sysco Fine Meats of Toronto
Sysco Fine Meats Vancouver
Sysco Food Services of Atlantic Canada
SYSCO Food Services of Canada
Sysco Food Services of Edmonton
Canada
 
Sysco Food Services of the Northwest Territories
SYSCO Food Services of Regina
Sysco Food Services of Toronto
Sysco Food Services of Vancouver
Sysco Four Seasons
Sysco Four Seasons Produce
Sysco Freshcut Produce Toronto
Sysco Freshcut Produce Vancouver
Sysco Halifax
SYSCO HRI Supply
Sysco Kelowna
Sysco Kingston
Sysco Kingston Redistribution Centre
Sysco London
Sysaco Milton
Sysco Moncton
Sysco Nasys
 
 
Sysco Quebec
Sysco Regina
Sysco Southwestern Ontario
Sysco St. John's
Sysco Sturgeon Falls
Sysco Thunder Bay
Sysco Toronto
Sysco Vancouver
Sysco Ventra
Sysco Victoria
Sysco Windsor
Sysco Winnipeg
Timpac Meat Distributors
Viandes St. Laurent
 
Sysco CA Holdings Sarl
 
Luxembourg
Sysco Central Alabama, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Central California, Inc.
 
California
Sysco Central Florida, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Central Illinois, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Central Pennsylvania, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Charlotte, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Chicago, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Cincinnati, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Cleveland, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Columbia, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Connecticut, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Corporation
 
Delaware
Sysco CRC Holdings S.R.L.
 
Costa Rica
Sysco Detroit, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Disaster Relief Foundation, Inc.
 
Texas
Sysco Eastern Maryland, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Eastern Wisconsin, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Foundation, Inc.
 
Texas
Sysco George Town Limited
 
Cayman Islands
Sysco George Town II Limited
 
Cayman Islands
Sysco Global Holdings, B.V.
 
Netherlands
Sysco Global Resources, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Global Services, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Grand Cayman Company
 
Cayman Islands
Sysco Grand Cayman II Company
 
Cayman Islands
Sysco Grand Cayman III Company
 
Cayman Islands
Sysco Grand Rapids, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Guest Supply Canada Inc.
 
Canada
Sysco Guest Supply Europe Limited
 
United Kingdom
Sysco Guest Supply, LLC
Guest Distribution
Delaware
Sysco Gulf Coast, Inc.
Freshpoint Gulf Coast
Delaware
Sysco Hampton Roads, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Holdings, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Indianapolis, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco International Food Group, Inc.
 
Florida
Sysco International, ULC
 
British Columbia, Canada
Sysco Iowa, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Jackson, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Jacksonville, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Kansas City, Inc.
 
Missouri
Sysco Knoxville, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Leasing, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Lincoln Transportation Company, Inc.
Pegler-Sysco Transportation CO.
Nebraska
Sysco Lincoln, Inc.
Lincoln Poultry & Egg CO.
Nebraska
Sysco Long Island, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Los Angeles, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Louisiana Seafood, LLC
Louisiana Foods Global Seafood Source
Delaware
Sysco Louisville, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Memphis, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Merchandising And Supply Chain Services, Inc.
Sysco South Redistribution Center
Sysco Northeast Redistribution Center
Sysco Imports
Alfmark
Alfmark Transportation
Baugh Supply Chain
Baugh Supply Chain Cooperative CA
BSCC CA
Cooperative Delaware Chaines
D'Approvisionnement Baugh, Inc.
Sysco South Redistribution Center
Delaware
Sysco Metro New York, LLC
Europa Meat
Delaware
Sysco Minnesota, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Montana, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Nashville, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Netherlands Partners, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Newport Meat Company
 
Delaware
Sysco North Central Florida, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco North Dakota, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Northern New England, Inc.
Reed Distributors
Maine
Sysco Philadelphia, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Pittsburgh, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Portland, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Raleigh, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Resources Services, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Riverside, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Sacramento, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco San Diego, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco San Francisco, Inc.
Race Street Foods
California
Sysco Seattle, Inc.
Sysco Food Services of Alaska
SYSCO Alaska
Delaware
Sysco South Florida, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Southeast Florida, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Spain Holdings, SLU
 
Spain
Sysco Spokane, Inc.
Sysco Food Services of Spokane
Delaware
Sysco St. Louis, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco Syracuse, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco USA I, Inc.
Sysco East Texas
Sysco North Texas
Sysco West Texas
Sysco Central Texas
Sysco Arizona
Sysco Denver
Sysco New Mexico
Sysco Intermountain
Sysco Houston
Sysco Idaho
Sysco Las Vegas
Try-City Meats
Delaware
Sysco USA II, LLC
Sysco Arkansas
Arrow Sysco Food Services
Sysco Oklahoma
Sysco New Orleans
Delaware
Sysco Ventura, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Ventures, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Virginia, LLC
 
Delaware
Sysco West Coast Florida, Inc.
 
Delaware
Sysco Western Minnesota, Inc.
Appert's Foodservice
Delaware
Sysco-Desert Meats Company, Inc.
 
Delaware
SYY Netherlands C.V.
 
Netherlands
The SYGMA Network, Inc.
 
Delaware
Walker Foods, Inc.
 
New York



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated August 24, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sysco Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Sysco Corporation for the year ended June 27, 2015, in the following registration statements and related prospectuses.

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-201216

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-192353

Sysco Corporation Form S-3        File No. 333-126199

Sysco Corporation Form S-3        File No. 333-179582

Sysco Corporation Form S-4        File No. 333-50842

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-147338

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 33-45820

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-58276

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-163189

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-163188

Sysco Corporation Form S-8        File No. 333-170660




Houston, Texas
August 24, 2015



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, William J. DeLaney, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sysco Corporation;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 24, 2015

/s/ WILLIAM J. DELANEY
William J. DeLaney
President and Chief Executive Officer






Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert C. Kreidler, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sysco Corporation;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I  are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:  August 24, 2015
 
/s/ ROBERT C. KREIDLER
Robert C. Kreidler
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Exhibit 32.1
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
I, William J. DeLaney,  President and Chief Executive Officer, of Sysco Corporation (the “company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
1.
The company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015  (“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2.
All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
 
Date:  August 24, 2015
 
/s/ WILLIAM J. DELANEY
William J. DeLaney
President and Chief Executive Officer




Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert C. Kreidler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Sysco Corporation (the “company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.
The company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015 (“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: August 24, 2015

/s/ ROBERT C. KREIDLER
Robert C. Kreidler
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer