SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
Or
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
Commission file number: 1-10153
HOMEFED CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware 33-0304982 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 1903 Wright Place Suite 220 |
Carlsbad, California 92008
(760) 918-8200
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code,
of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [x].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [x] No [ ]
Based on the average bid and asked prices of the Registrant's Common Stock as published by the OTC Bulletin Board Service as of June 30, 2003, the aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $111,152,000 on that date.
As of March 1, 2004, there were 8,256,679 outstanding shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Commission for use in connection with the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
PART I
THE COMPANY
Introduction
HomeFed Corporation ("HomeFed") was incorporated in Delaware in 1988. As used herein, the term "Company" refers to HomeFed and its subsidiaries, except as the context may otherwise require. The Company is currently engaged, directly and through subsidiaries, in the investment in and development of residential real estate projects in the State of California. The Company also investigates the acquisition of new real estate projects, both residential and commercial and within and outside the State of California, although no assurance can be given that the Company will find new investments providing a satisfactory return or, if found, that the Company will have access to the capital necessary to make new real estate investments. The executive office of the Company is located at 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220, Carlsbad, California 92008.
The Company's current development projects consist of two master-planned communities located in San Diego County, California: San Elijo Hills, and a portion of the larger Otay Ranch planning area. As discussed below, the Company acquired the owner of the San Elijo Hills project in October 2002; the San Elijo Hills project has been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
As the owner of these projects, the Company is responsible for the completion of a wide range of activities, including design engineering, grading raw land, constructing public infrastructure such as streets, utilities and public facilities, and finishing individual lots for home sites or other facilities. Prior to commencement of development of a project, the Company may engage in incidental activities to maintain the value of the project. The Company develops and markets its communities in phases to allow itself the flexibility to sell finished lots to suit market conditions and to enable it to create stable and attractive neighborhoods. Consequently, at any particular time, the various phases of a project will be in different stages of land development and construction. In addition, from time to time the Company will receive expressions of interest from buyers of multiple phases of a project, or the remaining undeveloped land of an entire project. The Company evaluates these proposals when it receives them, but no assurance can be given that the Company will sell all or any portion of its development projects in such a manner.
For any master-planned community, plans must be prepared that provide for infrastructure, neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas, educational and other institutional or public facilities, as well as open space. Once preliminary plans have been prepared, numerous governmental approvals, licenses, permits and agreements, referred to as "entitlements," must be obtained before development and construction may commence. These often involve a number of different governmental jurisdictions and agencies, challenges through litigation, considerable risk and expense, and substantial delays. Unless and until the requisite entitlements are received and substantial work has been commenced in reliance upon such entitlements, a developer generally does not have full "vested rights" to develop a project, and as a result, allocation of acreage between developable and non-developable land may change. In addition, as a precondition to receipt of building-related permits, master-planned communities such as San Elijo Hills typically are required in California to pay impact and capacity fees, or to otherwise satisfy mitigation requirements.
Current Development Projects
San Elijo Hills
In October 2002, the Company purchased from Leucadia National Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, "Leucadia") all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of CDS Holding Corporation ("CDS"), which through its majority-owned subsidiaries is the owner of the San Elijo Hills
project. The $25,000,000 purchase price consisted of $1,000,000 in cash and 2,474,226 shares of the Company's common stock, representing approximately 30% of the Company's outstanding shares. The San Elijo Hills project, a master-planned community located in the City of San Marcos in San Diego County, California, at completion is expected to be a community of approximately 3,400 homes and apartments, as well as commercial properties; the San Elijo Hills project is expected to be completed during the course of this decade. Since August 1998, the Company has been the development manager for this project, with responsibility for the overall management of the project, including, among other things, preserving existing entitlements and obtaining any additional entitlements required for the project, arranging financing for the project, coordinating marketing and sales activity, and acting as the construction manager. The development management agreement provided that the Company would participate in the net cash flow of the project through the payment of a success fee, and that the Company receive fees for the field overhead, management and marketing services it provides ("development management fees"), based on the revenues of the project. No success fee had been paid prior to the Company's acquisition of CDS. Through its majority owned subsidiaries, CDS has an effective 68% indirect equity interest in the San Elijo Hills project, after considering minority interests held by former owners of the project before CDS acquired its interest. However, CDS has the right to the return of funds advanced to the project and to receive a preferred return on its investment before any amounts are distributed to the minority shareholders. In January 2004, a dividend of $50,000,000 was paid by the Company's subsidiary that owns the San Elijo Hills project, of which $40,500,000 was ultimately received by the Company and the balance was paid to the minority interests. As a result, all amounts advanced to the project were repaid and the preferred return due at the time the dividend was paid was fully satisfied. For more information on the minority interests, see Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sales Activity. The table below summarizes sales activity at the San Elijo Hills project subsequent to the acquisition of CDS. At closing, a portion of the sales proceeds is deferred and not immediately recognized as revenue in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognizes deferred revenue upon completion of required improvements to the property sold, including costs related to common areas, under the percentage of completion method of accounting. Amounts shown below as development management fees earned are intercompany payments, which are eliminated in consolidation and therefore not reflected in the Company's consolidated statements of operations after the acquisition of CDS, but which are a source of liquidity for the parent company.
Year Ended October 21, 2002 to December 31, 2003 December 31, 2002 ----------------- ----------------- (Dollars in thousands) Number of units sold (1) 739 92 Aggregate sales proceeds from sales of residential sites, net of closing costs (2) $133,400 $24,700 Development management fees earned $ 8,100 $ 1,400 |
(1) Units are comprised of single family lots and very low income apartment
units.
(2) Excludes profit participation and consent fees described elsewhere in this
Report which are received subsequent to the closing of the land sales.
Prior to the Company's acquisition of CDS, sales activity at the San Elijo Hills project consisted of the sale of 1,584 residential and non-residential units for aggregate sales proceeds of $182,700,000, net of closing costs. Since the Company was not the owner of the project, it did not reflect these sales in its consolidated statements of operations. However, the Company did earn development management fees from these sales, which were reflected in its consolidated statements of operations. Development management fees earned were approximately $1,600,000 for the period from January 1, 2002 to October 21, 2002, and $4,800,000 and $3,500,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company estimates that it will
spend approximately $15,500,000 to complete the required improvements to sold
properties, which results in a deferred revenue balance of $53,500,000. The
Company will recognize the deferred revenue in its consolidated statements of
operations as the required improvements are completed under the percentage of
completion method of accounting.
In January 2004, the Company closed on sales to home builders of 94 single family lots and 45 multi-family units for aggregate cash proceeds of $33,000,000, net of closing costs. After considering these sales, the remaining land at the San Elijo Hills project to be developed and sold or leased consists of the following:
Single family lots to be developed and sold 736 Multi-family units 42 Very low income apartment units 70 School sites 2 Square footage of commercial space 135,000 |
The Company's current plans are to construct the multi-family units rather than sell them to another developer, after which the units will be sold or leased. The very low income apartment units that are planned represent an obligation to provide affordable housing in the project. The Company does not expect to earn a profit from the development of these units, and the issuance of building permits for lots not currently under contract may be delayed until this obligation is satisfied, thereby affecting the timing of future lot sales. Assuming the Company's development is not delayed, it expects to close the sales of the remaining residential units during 2004 and 2005; however, development activity on units sold is expected to continue into 2006 and on common areas into 2007.
Although the Company is obligated to sell both school sites to the school district, the school district is obligated to purchase only one site and has an option to acquire the other. In the event the school district does not exercise its option, underlying zoning would permit residential development of this site. With respect to the commercial space, the Company's current plan is to construct some of the commercial space rather than sell it to another builder. The commercial lots are fully developed; however, with the exception of the visitors' center, the Company has not yet constructed buildings on the commercial lots. The Company's plan for the town center includes a supermarket, gas station, office space and other stores, and discussions have begun with prospective users of the commercial space. The Company expects it will begin commercial space construction during 2004.
Although these development plans are based on the Company's current intentions, these plans could change, including as a result of actions of local regulatory authorities.
In order for the City of San Marcos to issue building permits to the Company's prospective lot purchasers for lot sales not already under contract, improvements to two off site roads need to be under construction. During 2004, the Company entered into an amendment to the project development agreement with the City of San Marcos/Redevelopment Agency of San Marcos (the "City"). The amendment, among other things, increases the Company's involvement in the development of these roads serving the San Elijo Hills project. The amendment requires the Company to contribute $11,000,000 to fund a portion of the cost of building these roads, including the acquisition of land, rights of way and/or environmental permits prior to the commencement of construction. Any costs in excess of this amount will be funded by the City. The Company believes that this change to its development agreement increases the likelihood that the construction of these roads will be initiated in a timely manner, such that the issuance of building permits will not be delayed. The Company expects it will commence construction of one of the roads during 2004 and the other in early 2005. The amendment, and the Company's obligation to fund the road construction costs, is conditioned upon the City imposing a special tax which would be levied against future property owners of a portion of the San Elijo Hills project. This tax would give home builders the right to receive funds from the City to reimburse them for the cost of public infrastructure improvements which were made at the Company's expense; a benefit which the Company believes would enable it to recover its road construction costs by charging home builders a price in excess of the market price. However, there is no assurance that the tax will be imposed or that the Company will be successful in recovering its expenses through higher prices to home builders.
The Company must obtain additional environmental permits in connection with the grading and development of the next phase of the project and the construction of the off site roads referred to above. Although the Company expects these permits to be issued in a timely manner, no assurance can be given when the permits will ultimately be issued.
Since 1999, the San Elijo Hills project has carried $50,000,000 of general liability and professional liability insurance under a policy issued by the Kemper Insurance Companies ("Kemper"). The policy covered a thirteen-year term from the initial date of coverage, and the entire premium for the life of the policy was paid in 1999. This policy is specific to the San Elijo Hills project; the Company has general and professional liability insurance for other matters with different insurance companies.
Kemper has ceased underwriting operations and has submitted a voluntary run-off plan to its insurance regulators. Although Kemper is not formally in liquidation or under the supervision of insurance regulators, it is uncertain whether they will have sufficient assets at such time, if ever, the Company makes a claim under the policy or, if they are insolvent, whether state insurance guaranty funds would be available to pay the claim. The Company has investigated replacing the coverage supplied by Kemper with a new insurance company; however, the Company has not found coverage equal to that provided by Kemper and premium rates have increased significantly. At this time the Company has not yet determined whether it needs to obtain replacement insurance, and if it determines to do so, whether it will be able to acquire insurance that is economically acceptable, if at all, or whether such insurance will cover past occurrences at the San Elijo Hills project.
Otay Ranch
In October 1998, the Company and Leucadia formed Otay Land Company, LLC (the "Otay Land Company") to purchase approximately 4,850 non-adjoining acres of land located within the larger 22,900 acre Otay Ranch master-planned community south of San Diego, California. Otay Land Company acquired this land for $19,500,000. When Otay Land Company was formed, Leucadia contributed $10,000,000 as a preferred capital interest, and the Company contributed all other funds as non-preferred capital. The Company is the managing member of Otay Land Company.
In 1993, the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego approved a General Development Plan for the larger planning area. Although there is no specified time within which implementation of the General Development Plan must be completed, it is expected that full development of the larger planning area will take decades. This General Development Plan establishes land use goals, objectives and policies within the larger planning area. The General Development Plan for the larger planning area contemplates home sites, a golf-oriented resort and residential community, commercial retail centers, a proposed university site and a network of infrastructure, including roads and highways, a public transportation system, park systems and schools. Any development within the larger Otay Ranch master-planned community must be consistent with this General Development Plan. While the General Development Plan can be amended, subject to approval by either or both of the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego, Otay Land Company has certain vested and contractual rights, pursuant to a development agreement, that protect its development interests in Chula Vista, covering substantially all of its developable land. However, actual land development will require that further entitlements and approvals be obtained.
In April 2003, Otay Land Company sold approximately 1,445 acres within the Otay Ranch master-planned community to an unrelated third party for a sales price of $22,500,000 in cash and recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $17,700,000. Otay Land Company used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to fully redeem the preferred capital interest and preferred return of approximately $12,900,000 due to Leucadia, which was required to be paid before any distributions could be paid to the Company.
In August 2002, Otay Land Company reached an agreement with the City of Chula Vista and another party whereby the City agreed to acquire 439 acres of mitigation land from Otay Land Company by eminent domain proceedings. On January 15, 2004, these proceedings were concluded and the mitigation land was sold to the City for aggregate proceeds of approximately $5,800,000, substantially all of which had been received as of December 31, 2003. A pre-tax gain of approximately $4,900,000 will be recognized in 2004.
After considering the above transactions, Otay Land Company owns approximately 2,900 acres, of which the total developable area is approximately 700 acres, including approximately 185 acres of land designated as "Limited Development Area and Common Use Area." The remaining approximately
2,200 acres are designated as various qualities of non-developable open space mitigation land. Under the General Development Plan, 1.188 acres of open space mitigation land from within the Otay Ranch project must be dedicated to the government for each 1.0 acre of land that is developed, excluding land designated Limited Development Area and Common Use Area.
Some owners of development land have adequate or excess mitigation land, while other owners lack sufficient acreage of mitigation land to cover their inventory of development land. Otay Land Company currently has substantially more mitigation land than it would need to develop its property at this project. Based upon the General Development Plan conditions, a market for this land could develop within the larger Otay Ranch development area as development progresses; however, such a market is partially dependent upon other parties with developable land fully developing their land. Should other owners choose not to develop their developable land, it is unlikely that Otay Land Company's mitigation land can be sold to other owners within the larger Otay Ranch planning area to meet their mitigation requirements. A sporadic market for Otay Land Company's excess mitigation land may be developing among buyers of such land in the San Diego County region. However, it is unclear whether the County of San Diego would determine that Otay Ranch mitigation land is acceptable for development unrelated to Otay Ranch.
The Company continues to evaluate how to maximize the value of this investment while pursuing land sales and processing further entitlements on portions of its property. Otay Land Company has also submitted a General Development Plan Amendment to the City of Chula Vista to increase the number of residential units that it can develop, which may or may not be granted. Even if Otay Land Company receives its entitlements to develop its property, it is uncertain whether it will develop or sell its developable land. As a result, the Company is unable to predict when revenues will be derived from this project. As indicated above, the ultimate development of projects of this type is subject to significant governmental and environmental regulation and approval and is likely to take many years. For additional information concerning governmental and environmental matters, see "Government Regulation" and "Environmental Compliance" below.
In October 2003, approximately 1,800 acres of land (consisting almost entirely of non-developable open space mitigation land) owned by Otay Land Company was burned by the fires that swept through Southern California. This represents approximately 55% of the total land owned by the Otay Land Company, and approximately 70% of the open space mitigation land. The Company does not currently believe that the fires will have a material adverse effect on the property's value.
Other Projects
Rampage Property
In November 2003, the Company purchased a 2,159 acre grape vineyard located in southern Madera County, California. The purchase price for the property was $6,000,000, excluding expenses, of which $1,700,000 was paid in cash and the balance was financed. The Company has leased the farming rights for approximately one-half of the property to one of the former owners for a fifteen year period; however, the lease can be cancelled by the Company, in whole or in part, after five years (providing two years notice are given), or can be cancelled earlier upon the occurrence of certain other specified events. The lease provides that annual rent payments will be based upon the revenue received by the tenant from selling the grapes produced, but the amount is not expected to be material.
Although the property is not currently entitled for residential development, it is located in a growing residential area northeast of Fresno, California. The Company purchased this land with the intention of obtaining the necessary entitlements to develop the property as a master-planned community; however, approvals from various government agencies will be required, including the acquisition of a water supply that meets regulatory requirements. The Company expects the entitlement process will take several years and no assurance can be given that such entitlements will be obtained.
An owner of adjacent property has claimed that he has options to purchase approximately 600 acres of the Rampage property for approximately $4,900,000. The Company is currently evaluating the merits of this claim and how it will proceed.
Competition
Real estate development is a highly competitive business. There are numerous residential real estate developers and development projects operating in the same geographic area in which the Company operates. Competition among real estate developers and development projects is determined by the location of the real estate, the market appeal of the development master plan, and the developer's ability to build, market and deliver project segments on a timely basis. Many of the Company's competitors may have greater financial resources and/or access to cheaper capital than the Company. Residential developers sell to homebuilders, who compete based on location, price, market segmentation, product design and reputation.
Government Regulation
The residential real estate development industry is subject to substantial environmental, building, construction, zoning and real estate regulations that are imposed by various federal, state and local authorities. In developing a community, the Company must obtain the approval of numerous governmental agencies regarding such matters as permitted land uses, housing density, the installation of utility services (such as water, sewer, gas, electric, telephone and cable television) and the dedication of acreage for open space, parks, schools and other community purposes. Regulations affect homebuilding by specifying, among other things, the type and quality of building materials that must be used, certain aspects of land use and building design and the manner in which homebuilders may conduct their sales, operations, and overall relationships with potential home buyers. Furthermore, changes in prevailing local circumstances or applicable laws may require additional approvals, or modifications of approvals previously obtained.
Timing of the initiation and completion of development projects depends upon receipt of necessary authorizations and approvals. Because of the provisional nature of these approvals and the concerns of various environmental and public interest groups, the approval process can be delayed by withdrawals or modifications of preliminary approvals and by litigation and appeals challenging development rights. The ability of the Company to develop projects could be delayed or prevented due to litigation challenging previously obtained governmental approvals. The Company may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or "slow-growth" or "no-growth" initiatives that could be implemented in the future. Such delays could adversely affect the Company's ability to complete its projects, significantly increase the costs of doing so or drive potential customers to purchase competitors' products.
Environmental Compliance
Environmental laws may cause the Company to incur substantial compliance, mitigation and other costs, may restrict or prohibit development in certain areas and may delay completion of the Company's development projects. Delays arising from compliance with environmental laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company's ability to complete its projects, significantly increase the costs of doing so or cause potential customers to purchase competitors' products.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at that property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remediate these substances when present, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent that real property or to borrow funds using that real property as collateral. It may impose unanticipated costs and delays on projects. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic wastes may also be liable for the costs of the investigation, removal and remediation of those wastes at the disposal or treatment facility, regardless of whether that facility is owned or operated by that person. In addition to remediation actions brought by federal, state and local agencies, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in personal injury, contribution or other claims by private parties. These claims could result in costs or liabilities that could exceed the value of that property. We are not aware of any notification by any private party or governmental authority of any claim in connection with environmental conditions at any of our properties that we believe will involve any material expenditure other than as disclosed herein.
The Company obtained a preliminary remediation study concerning 34 acres of undeveloped land owned by a subsidiary of Otay Land Company. The need for remediation results from activities conducted on the land prior to Otay Land Company's ownership. Based upon the preliminary findings of this study, in 2002 the Company estimated that the cost to implement the most likely remediation alternative would be approximately $11,200,000, and accrued that amount as an operating expense. The estimated liability is neither discounted nor reduced for potential claims for recovery from previous owners and users of the land who may be liable, and may increase or decrease based upon the actual extent and nature of the remediation required, the type of remedial process approved, the expenses of the regulatory process, inflation and other items. The Company periodically adjusts its liability to reflect its current best estimate; however, no assurance can be given that the actual amount of environmental liability will not exceed the amount of reserves for this matter or that it will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During 2003, Otay Land Company developed an investigation plan, which the San Diego Department of Environmental Health ("DEH") approved, to further determine the nature and extent of contamination on the property. In January 2004, the State Department of Toxic Substance Control ("DTSC") approved DEH as the overseeing agency of the remediation. The Company through its application to DTSC is now required to remediate the contamination. Otay Land Company selected an environmental consultant to implement the investigation plan, which is being conducted under the San Diego County Voluntary Cleanup Program and under the oversight of the DEH. Otay Land Company expects to complete the investigation during 2004, after which it will submit its remediation plan to and seek approval from the DEH. However, the Company is unable to predict when the remediation will commence and there is no current regulatory requirement to commence remediation by a fixed date. Further, the Company has filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in the Southern District of California seeking compensation from the parties which it believes are responsible for the contamination. However, the Company can give no assurances that this lawsuit will be successful or that it will be able to recover any of the costs incurred in investigating and/or remediating the contamination.
Employees
At December 31, 2003, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries had 22 full-time employees.
Relationship with Leucadia; Administrative Services Agreement
In 1995, Leucadia funded the Company's bankruptcy plan by purchasing common stock and a secured promissory note of the Company. In 1999, Leucadia distributed all of the HomeFed common stock that it owned to shareholders of Leucadia. In October 2002, Leucadia again acquired an equity interest in the Company when it received 2,474,226 shares of the Company's common stock, representing approximately 30% of the Company's outstanding shares, as partial consideration for its sale to the Company of CDS. For additional information, see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company's promissory note, which has been amended, is secured by substantially all of the Company's assets and at December 31, 2003 had a principal amount outstanding of $26,462,000. The note is payable on December 31, 2007 and bears interest at 6% per year through 2004, 9% in 2005, 10% in 2006 and 11% in 2007. On March 3, 2004, the Company's Board of Directors determined to prepay the Leucadia note in full, which it expects to do before March 31, 2004.
As a result of the distribution of HomeFed common stock to Leucadia's shareholders in 1999, Joseph S. Steinberg, Chairman of the Board of HomeFed, and Ian M. Cumming, a director of HomeFed, together with their respective family members (excluding trusts for the benefit of Mr. Steinberg's children) beneficially own, at March 1, 2004, approximately 8.7% and 9.4%, respectively, of the Company's outstanding common stock, before consideration of the common shares owned by Leucadia. Mr. Steinberg is also President and a director of Leucadia and Mr. Cumming is Chairman of the Board of Leucadia. At March 1, 2004, Mr. Steinberg and Mr. Cumming beneficially owned (together with their respective family members but excluding trusts for the benefit of Mr. Steinberg's children) approximately 12.9% and 13.2%, respectively, of Leucadia's outstanding common shares. In addition to their ownership of HomeFed common stock (directly and through family members), as a result of their beneficial ownership of Leucadia common shares, Messrs. Cumming and Steinberg each may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of HomeFed common stock owned by Leucadia.
In 2003, the Company paid Leucadia approximately $12,900,000 in redemption of Leucadia's preferred capital interest in Otay Land Company and in full satisfaction of the preferred return related thereto.
The Company is required to obtain infrastructure improvement bonds primarily for the benefit of the City of San Marcos prior to the beginning of lot construction work and warranty bonds upon completion of such improvements in the San Elijo Hills project. These bonds provide funds primarily to the City in the event the Company is unable or unwilling to complete certain infrastructure improvements in the San Elijo Hills project. Leucadia has obtained these bonds on behalf of CDS and its subsidiaries both before and after the acquisition of CDS by the Company. CDS is responsible for paying all third party fees related to obtaining the bonds. Should the City or others draw on the bonds for any reason, one of CDS's subsidiaries would be obligated to reimburse Leucadia for the amount drawn. As of December 31, 2003, the amount of outstanding bonds was approximately $31,700,000.
Since 1995, Leucadia has been providing administrative and accounting services to the Company. Under the current administrative services agreement, which extends through December 31, 2004, Leucadia provides services to the Company for a monthly fee of $10,000. Pursuant to this agreement, Leucadia provides the services of Ms. Corinne A. Maki, the Company's Secretary, in addition to various administrative functions. Ms. Maki is an officer of subsidiaries of Leucadia. The cost of services provided by Leucadia during 2003 aggregated $120,000.
In March 2001, the Company entered into an unsecured $3,000,000 line of credit agreement with Leucadia. Loans outstanding under this line of credit bear interest at 10% per year; in 2003, the Company paid $38,000 in commitment fees and incurred no interest expense. Effective March 1, 2002, this agreement was amended to extend the maturity to February 28, 2007, although Leucadia had the right to terminate the line of credit on an annual basis. In October 2002, the line of credit was increased to $10,000,000 and Leucadia's ability to terminate the line of credit prior to maturity was removed, unless the Company is in default. As of March 1, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under this facility.
The Company rents office space at its corporate headquarters and furnishings to Leucadia for a monthly rental equal to Leucadia's pro rata share of the Company's cost for such space and furnishings. In 2003, the rent paid by Leucadia to the Company totaled $72,000.
Investor Information
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Accordingly, the Company files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding the Company and other issuers that file electronically.
The Company does not maintain a website. The Company will
provide without charge upon request copies of its annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Requests for such copies should be directed to: HomeFed
Corporation, 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (telephone number
(760) 918-8200), Attention: Corporate Secretary.
The Company currently develops two real estate properties, the San Elijo Hills project and the Otay Land Company project, and in 2003 acquired the Rampage property, all of which are described under Item 1, Business. Real estate had an aggregate book value of approximately $37,600,000 at December 31, 2003.
The Company leases 8,944 square feet for its corporate headquarters which is located at 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220, Carlsbad, California 92008. A portion of this space is sub-leased to Leucadia for a monthly base rental of $6,000 in 2002, $4,000 in 2003 and $4,200 in 2004.
The Company is not a party to legal proceedings other than ordinary, routine litigation, incidental to its business or not material to the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
As of March 4, 2004, the executive officers of the Company, their ages, the positions held by them and the periods during which they have served in such positions are as follows:
Name Age Position with HomeFed Office Held Since ---- --- --------------------- ----------------- Paul J. Borden 55 President 1998 Corinne A. Maki 46 Secretary 1995 Curt R. Noland 47 Vice President 1998 Erin N. Ruhe 38 Vice President, Treasurer and Controller 2000 |
The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of HomeFed.
The recent business experience of our executive officers is summarized as follows:
Paul J. Borden. Mr. Borden has served as a director and President of HomeFed since May 1998. Mr. Borden had been a Vice President of Leucadia from August 1988 through October 2000, responsible for overseeing many of Leucadia's real estate investments.
Corinne A. Maki. Ms. Maki, a certified public accountant, has served as Secretary of HomeFed since February 1998 and was Treasurer of HomeFed from February 1995 to March 2004. Prior to that, Ms. Maki served as an Assistant Secretary of HomeFed since August 1995. Ms. Maki has also been a Vice President of Leucadia Financial Corporation, a subsidiary of Leucadia, holding the offices of Controller, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer since October 1992. Ms. Maki has been employed by Leucadia since December 1991.
Curt R. Noland. Mr. Noland has served as Vice President of HomeFed since October 1998. He spent the last 24 years in the land development industry in San Diego County as a design consultant, merchant builder and a master developer. From November 1997 until joining HomeFed, Mr. Noland was employed by the prior development manager of San Elijo Hills and served as Director of Development for San Elijo Hills. Prior to November 1997, Mr. Noland was employed for eight years by Aviara Land Associates, LP, a 1,000 acre master-planned resort community in Carlsbad, California. He is also a licensed civil engineer and real estate broker.
Erin N. Ruhe. Ms. Ruhe has served as Vice President of HomeFed since April 2000, Treasurer since March 2004 and has been employed by HomeFed as Controller since January 1999. Previously, Ms. Ruhe was Vice President since December 1995 and Controller since November 1994 of HSD Venture, a real estate subsidiary of Leucadia.
PART II
On July 14, 2003, following shareholder approval, the Company effected a reverse 1-for-250 stock split (the "reverse split") followed immediately by a forward 25-for-1 stock split (the "forward split") of its common stock, which had the net effect of a reverse 1-for-10 stock split (the "reverse/forward split"). Holders of fewer than 250 shares of common stock prior to the reverse split and holders of fractional interests in common stock following the forward split received a cash payment for the value of their fractional interests. The Company's transfer agent aggregated all fractional interests and sold them at prevailing market prices. Stockholders were required to surrender their old common stock certificates in order to receive new stock certificates and/or cash pursuant to the reverse/forward split. Because the net result of the reverse/forward stock split effectively was a reverse 1-for-10 stock split, the Company also proportionately reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock to 25,000,000. All common share and per share amounts in this Report have been restated to give retroactive effect to the reverse/forward stock split.
Following shareholder approval at the 2003 annual meeting, the Company amended to its certificate of incorporation to create a class of preferred stock, of which 3,000,000 shares are authorized and none have been issued. The Company has no current intention to issue the preferred stock.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid price of the Company's common stock for each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years. The market prices below give retroactive effect to the reverse/forward stock split.
High Low ---- --- Year ended December 31, 2002 First Quarter $ 9.40 $ 8.00 Second Quarter 9.70 8.30 Third Quarter 10.60 8.85 Fourth Quarter 16.50 9.00 Year ended December 31, 2003 First Quarter $ 15.30 $ 13.50 Second Quarter 29.00 13.70 Third Quarter 28.40 22.50 Fourth Quarter 30.00 24.30 Year ending December 31, 2004 First quarter (through March 1, 2004) $ 32.75 $ 29.25 |
The Company's common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market. The Company's common stock is not listed on any stock exchange, and price information for the common stock is not regularly quoted on any automated quotation system. In connection with the reverse/forward stock split, the trading symbol for the Company's stock was changed to "HOFD" effective July 14, 2003. The prices above are based on the high and low bid price per share, as published by the National Association of Securities Dealers OTC Bulletin Board Service, as adjusted to give retroactive effect to the reverse/forward stock split. The over-the-counter quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark up, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. On March 1, 2004, the closing bid price for the Company's common stock was $32.75 per share. As of that date, there were 5,609 stockholders of record. The Company did not declare dividends on its common stock during 2002 or 2003.
The Company does not currently meet certain requirements for listing on a national securities exchange or inclusion on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have net operating
loss carryforwards ("NOLs") and other tax attributes, the amount and
availability of which are subject to certain qualifications, limitations and
uncertainties. In order to reduce the possibility that certain changes in
ownership could impose limitations on the use of the NOLs, the Company's
certificate of incorporation contains provisions which generally restrict the
ability of a person or entity from accumulating five percent or more of the
common stock and the ability of persons or entities now owning five percent or
more of the common stock from acquiring additional common stock. The
restrictions will remain in effect until the earliest of (a) December 31, 2010,
(b) the repeal of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (or any comparable
successor provision) and (c) the beginning of a taxable year of the Company to
which certain tax benefits may no longer be carried forward.
The transfer agent for the Company's common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038.
The following selected financial data have been summarized from the Company's consolidated financial statements and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, such consolidated financial statements and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contained in Item 7 of this Report. The results of CDS are included in the Company's consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition (October 21, 2002), and is the primary reason for the significant increase in 2003 revenues, expenses and profitability as compared to earlier periods. As indicated above, all common share and per share amounts have been restated to give retroactive effect to the reverse/forward stock split.
Year Ended December 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ------------- ---------- ----------- --------- (In thousands, except per share amounts) SELECTED INCOME STATEMENT DATA: Revenues (1) $148,285 $ 13,111 $ 6,523 $ 5,175 $ 2,643 Expenses (2) 50,575 22,418 6,932 7,754 9,058 Income (loss) before minority interest 85,237 (9,375) (377) (2,409) (7,002) Net income (loss) 74,076 (11,086) (1,377) (3,409) (7,282) Basic income (loss) per share..... $ 9.08 $ (1.80) $ (0.24) $ (0.60) $ (2.24) Diluted income (loss) per share... $ 8.99 $ (1.80) $ (0.24) $ (0.60) $ (2.24) At December 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ------------- ---------- ----------- --------- (In thousands, except per share amounts) Cash and cash equivalents $ 43,503 $ 33,601 $ 1,454 $ 1,631 $ 2,795 Investments 88,519 -- -- -- -- Real estate 37,612 31,108 23,890 22,979 23,707 Total assets 217,010 117,043 25,804 24,818 27,528 Note payable to Leucadia Financial Corporation 24,716 23,628 22,508 21,474 20,552 Notes payable to trust deed holders 13,580 16,704 -- -- -- Stockholders' equity (deficit) 76,330 1,650 (11,623) (10,421) (7,107) Shares outstanding 8,155 8,155 5,680 5,680 5,655 Book value per share $ 9.36 $ 0.20 $ (2.05) $ (1.83) $ (1.25) |
(1) Prior to the acquisition of CDS includes development management fee income
from San Elijo Hills of $1,600,000 for the period from January 1, 2002 to
October 21, 2002, and $4,800,000 and $3,500,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These payments will no longer be
reflected as revenues since they will be eliminated in consolidation.
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2002, includes an $11,200,000 provision for
environmental remediation, which is more fully discussed in Results of
Operations below.
The purpose of this section is to discuss and analyze the Company's consolidated financial condition, liquidity and capital resources and results of operations. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes which appear elsewhere in this Report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, net cash was provided by operating activities, principally from the proceeds from the sale of real estate, whereas for the year ended December 31, 2001, net cash was used for operating activities, principally to pay interest and general and administrative expenses. The parent company's principal sources of funds are proceeds from the sale of real estate, its $10,000,000 line of credit with Leucadia, fee income from the San Elijo Hills project, dividends and tax sharing payments from its subsidiaries and borrowings from or repayment of advances by its subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had consolidated cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities aggregating $132,000,000. The Company's investment portfolio and cash equivalents are comprised entirely of highly rated investment grade securities issued by agencies of the U.S. government. In January 2004, a dividend of $50,000,000 was paid by the Company's subsidiary that owns the San Elijo Hills project, of which $40,500,000 was ultimately received by HomeFed and the balance was paid to the minority interests in the San Elijo Hills project. The dividend does not increase the amount of consolidated liquidity reflected on the Company's consolidated balance sheet; however, it does increase the liquidity of the parent company. When added to the cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities already held by the parent company as of December 31, 2003, the parent company will have approximately $76,700,000 of liquid assets to satisfy its needs, the needs of its subsidiaries and for future investment opportunities.
The Company expects that its cash on hand, together with the sources described above, will be sufficient for both its short and long term liquidity needs. The San Elijo Hills project is expected to be a continuing source of funds to the Company during the next two years if project development continues as planned, and if economic conditions remain favorable for the local housing market. Until the Company is reasonably assured it will be able to sell developed property for an adequate return, the San Elijo Hills project will not require significant funds for development. The Company is not relying on receipt of funds from Otay Land Company for the foreseeable future, since the timing of sales of undeveloped property, development activity and sales of developable and undevelopable property cannot be predicted with any certainty. However, except for the environmental remediation matter discussed below, Otay Land Company is not expected to require material funds in the short term, and long term needs will not be determined until a development plan is established. The Company is not currently committed to acquire any new real estate projects, but it does have sufficient liquidity to take advantage of appropriate acquisition opportunities if they are presented.
On March 3, 2004, the Board determined to prepay the $26,462,000 borrowing from Leucadia in full. The Company expects to repay the note in late March, using its available cash. Although the Company has no current plans or intentions to replace this debt, the Company believes that it will have access to financing on acceptable terms should the need arise. Since the note is reflected in the December 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet net of a discount of $1,746,000, the entire discount will be reflected as an expense in the Company's 2004 consolidated statement of operations.
The Company currently has an unsecured $10,000,000 line of credit agreement with Leucadia, which has a maturity date of February 28, 2007. Loans outstanding under this line of credit bear interest at 10% per year. As of March 1, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under this facility.
During 2003, seven neighborhoods at the San Elijo Hills project consisting of 535 single family lots and 204 very low income apartment units were sold for an aggregate purchase price of $133,400,000, net of closing costs. Of this amount, $1,800,000 related to non-refundable options payments that were received in 2002. The Company deferred recognition of $39,900,000 of revenue from these sales since it is required to complete certain improvements under the purchase agreements.
As of December 31, 2003, the aggregate balance of deferred
revenue for all real estate sales was $53,500,000, including amounts related to
the 2003 sales. The Company estimates that it will spend approximately
$15,500,000 to complete the required improvements, including costs related to
common areas. The Company will recognize revenues previously deferred and the
related cost of sales in its statements of operations as the improvements are
completed under the percentage of completion method of accounting. The Company
currently estimates that it will substantially complete the required
improvements during 2004.
During 2003, the Company recorded $8,500,000 of revenues related to profit sharing and consent payments received from home builders who purchased lots in the San Elijo Hills project. Certain of the Company's lot purchase agreements with home builders include provisions that entitle the Company to a share of the profits realized by the home builders upon their sale of the homes, and often require the Company's consent before the home builder can resell the lots to another builder. Since the future plans and potential profits of the Company's home builders are uncertain, the Company is unable to predict whether additional payments will be received in the future.
In January 2004, the Company closed on sales to home builders of 94 single family lots and 45 multi-family units for aggregate cash proceeds of $33,000,000, net of closing costs, of which $3,100,000 of non-refundable option payments had been received in 2003. These option payments were applied to reduce the amount due from the purchasers at closing.
In order for the City of San Marcos to issue building permits to the Company's prospective lot purchasers for lot sales not already under contract, improvements to two off site roads need to be under construction. During 2004, the Company entered into an amendment to the project development agreement with the City of San Marcos/Redevelopment Agency of San Marcos (the "City"). The amendment, among other things, increases the Company's involvement in the development of these roads serving the San Elijo Hills project. The amendment requires the Company to contribute $11,000,000 to fund a portion of the cost of building these roads, including the acquisition of land, rights of way and/or environmental permits prior to the commencement of construction. Any costs in excess of this amount will be funded by the City. The Company believes that this change to its development agreement increases the likelihood that the construction of these roads will be initiated in a timely manner, such that the issuance of building permits will not be delayed. The Company expects it will commence construction of one of the roads during 2004 and the other in early 2005. The amendment, and the Company's obligation to fund the road construction costs, is conditioned upon the City imposing a special tax which would be levied against future property owners of a portion of the San Elijo Hills project. This tax would give home builders the right to receive funds from the City to reimburse them for the cost of public infrastructure improvements which were made at the Company's expense; a benefit which the Company believes would enable it to recover its road construction costs by charging home builders a price in excess of the market price. However, there is no assurance that the tax will be imposed or that the Company will be successful in recovering its expenses through higher prices to home builders.
Since 1999, the San Elijo Hills project has carried $50,000,000 of general liability and professional liability insurance under a policy issued by the Kemper Insurance Companies ("Kemper"). The policy covered a thirteen year term from the initial date of coverage, and the entire premium for the life of the policy was paid in 1999. This policy is specific to the San Elijo Hills project; the Company has general and professional liability insurance for other matters with different insurance companies. To date, the Company has not made any material claims under the policy.
Kemper has ceased underwriting operations and has submitted a voluntary run-off plan to its insurance regulators. Although Kemper is not formally in liquidation or under the supervision of insurance regulators, it is uncertain whether they will have sufficient assets at such time, if ever, the Company makes a claim under the policy or, if they are insolvent, whether state insurance guaranty funds would be available to pay the claim. The Company has investigated replacing the coverage supplied by Kemper with a new insurance company; however, the Company has not found coverage equal to that provided by Kemper and premium rates have increased significantly. At this time the Company has not yet determined whether it needs to obtain replacement insurance, and if it determines to do so, whether it will be able to acquire insurance that is economically acceptable, if at all, or whether such insurance will cover past occurrences at the San Elijo Hills project.
In April 2003, Otay Land Company sold approximately 1,445 acres within the Otay Ranch master-planned community to an unrelated third party for a sales price of $22,500,000 in cash and recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $17,700,000. Otay Land Company used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to fully redeem the preferred capital interest and preferred return of approximately $12,900,000 due to Leucadia, which was required to be paid before any distributions could be paid to the Company.
In August 2002, Otay Land Company reached an agreement with the City of Chula Vista and another party whereby the City agreed to acquire 439 acres of mitigation land from Otay Land Company by eminent domain proceedings. On January 15, 2004, these proceedings were concluded and the mitigation land was sold to the City for aggregate proceeds of approximately $5,800,000, substantially all of which had been received as of December 31, 2003. A pre-tax gain of approximately $4,900,000 will be recognized in 2004.
In 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with another party to develop its remaining interest in the Paradise Valley project, located in Fairfield, California. During 2003, the joint venture sold all of the property at the Paradise Valley project for which the Company received net proceeds of $2,900,000 and recognized pre-tax income of $1,500,000, net of minority interest.
As indicated in the table below, at December 31, 2003, the Company's contractual cash obligations totaled $47,226,000. The Company's note payable to Leucadia is collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company, whether now owned or hereafter acquired. The notes payable to trust deed holders are collateralized by the San Elijo Hills project. For additional information, see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Payments Due by Period (in thousands) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Amounts Less Than 1 After 5 Contractual Obligations Committed Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years Years ----------------------- --------- ---- --------- --------- ----- Note payable to Leucadia $ 26,462 $ 26,462 $ -- $ -- $ -- Notes payable to trust deed holders 16,185 -- 353 537 15,295 Rampage payable 4,332 4,332 -- -- -- Operating lease, net of sublease income 247 211 36 -- -- -------- --------- ------- ------- ------- Total Contractual Cash Obligations $ 47,226 $ 31,005 $ 389 $ 537 $ 15,295 ======== ========= ======= ======= ======== |
As discussed above, in March 2004 the Company's Board determined to prepay the note payable to Leucadia in full in 2004. This obligation is reflected in the consolidated balance sheet, net of debt discount, at $24,716,000 as of December 31, 2003.
In November 2003, the Company purchased the Rampage property for $6,000,000, excluding expenses, of which $1,700,000 was paid in cash and the balance remains due to the seller. The Company furnished to the seller a letter of credit (which is fully collateralized by cash) in the amount of $4,300,000 to secure it's obligation to the seller. The Rampage property remains encumbered by a mortgage lien of $3,800,000, which was originally granted by the seller to a mortgage lender and which the Company is not obligated to satisfy. Although the amount owed to the seller does not bear interest, the Company is obligated to make interest payments due under the mortgage during 2004 while the lien remains on the property. However, any principal payments made by the Company to the mortgage lender will reduce the balance owed to the seller. If the lien remains outstanding for all of 2004, the total amount of interest the Company will be required to pay is approximately $300,000. By the end of 2004, the Company will either fully pay the amount it owes to the seller and have the mortgage lien released, or assume the mortgage lien or repay the mortgage, which in both instances will be fully offset by a reduction in the amount owed to the seller.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had NOLs of $168,600,000 available to reduce its future federal income tax liabilities and $2,200,000 of alternative minimum tax credit carryovers. The federal NOLs are not available to reduce federal alternative minimum taxable income, which is currently taxed at the rate of 20%. As a result, the Company expects to pay federal income tax at a rate of 20% during future periods. For more information, see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is required to obtain infrastructure improvement
bonds primarily for the benefit of the City of San Marcos prior to the beginning
of lot construction work and warranty bonds upon completion of such improvements
at the San Elijo Hills project. These bonds provide funds primarily to the City
in the event the Company is unable or unwilling to complete certain
infrastructure improvements in the San Elijo Hills project. Leucadia has
obtained these bonds on behalf of CDS and its subsidiaries both before and after
the acquisition of CDS by the Company. CDS is responsible for paying all third
party fees related to obtaining the bonds. Should the City or others draw on the
bonds for any reason, certain of the Company's subsidiaries would be obligated
to reimburse Leucadia for the amount drawn. As of December 31, 2003, the amount
of outstanding bonds was approximately $31,700,000, none of which have been
drawn upon.
Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Estimates
The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates all of these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Profit Recognition on Sales of Real Estate - When the Company has an obligation to complete improvements on property subsequent to the date of sale, it utilizes the percentage of completion method of accounting to record revenues and cost of sales. Under percentage of completion accounting, the Company recognizes revenues and cost of sales based upon the ratio of development costs completed as of the date of sale to an estimate of total development costs which will ultimately be incurred, including an estimate for common areas. Revenues which cannot be recognized as of the date of sale are reported as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2003, the Company's deferred revenue balance aggregated $53,500,000.
The Company believes it can reasonably estimate its future costs and profit allocation in order to determine how much revenue should be deferred. However, such estimates are based on numerous assumptions and require management's judgment. For example, the estimate of future development costs includes an assumption about the cost of construction services for which the Company has no current contractual arrangement. If the estimate of these future costs proves to be too low, then the Company will have recognized too much profit as of the date of sale resulting in less profit to be reported as the improvements are completed. However, to date the Company's estimates of future development costs that have been used to determine the amount of revenue to be deferred at the date of sale have subsequently been proven to be reasonably accurate estimates.
Income Taxes - The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax asset to an amount that the Company expects is more likely than not to be realized. If the Company's estimate of the realizability of its deferred tax asset changes in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded which would either increase or decrease income tax expense in such period. The valuation allowance is determined after considering all relevant facts and circumstances, but is significantly influenced by the Company's projection of taxable income in the future. As of December 31, 2003, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $35,100,000, principally to reserve for alternative minimum tax credit carryovers which the Company believes are not currently realizable. The Company calculated the allowance based on the assumption that it would be able to generate future taxable income of approximately $170,000,000, which is sufficient to fully utilize the Company's NOLs.
The calculation of the valuation allowance recognizes that the Company's NOLs will not be available to offset alternative minimum taxable income, which is currently taxed at a federal tax rate of 20%. When the Company pays alternative minimum tax, it generates an alternative minimum tax credit carryover, which can be used to reduce its future federal income tax rate once it has used all of its NOLs. Assuming the Company realizes its projected taxable income in the future and fully utilizes its NOLs, it will have approximately $35,000,000 of minimum tax credit carryovers to reduce future federal income taxes payable. However, the minimum tax credit carryovers are only able to reduce the Company's federal income tax rate to 20% in any given year, which means the Company would have to generate an additional $230,000,000 of taxable income above the current projection to fully use them. As a result, the Company has reserved for substantially all of this benefit in its valuation allowance.
The projection of future taxable income is based upon numerous assumptions about the future, including future market conditions where the Company's projects are located, regulatory requirements, estimates of future real estate revenues and development costs, the ability of the Company to realize taxable profits prior to the expiration of its NOLs, future interest expense, operating and overhead costs and other factors. In addition, to the extent the Company's actual taxable income in the future exceeds its estimate, the Company will recognize additional tax benefits; conversely, if the actual taxable income is less than the amounts projected, an addition to the valuation allowance would be recorded that would increase tax expense in the future. The Company evaluates the amount of its valuation allowance on a quarterly basis.
Provision for Environmental Remediation - The Company records environmental liabilities when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount or range of the liability is reasonably estimable. During 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $11,200,000 representing its estimate of the cost to implement the most likely remediation alternative with respect to 34 acres of undeveloped land owned by a subsidiary of Otay Land Company. The estimated liability was neither discounted nor reduced for potential claims for recovery from previous owners and users of the land who may be liable, and may increase or decrease based upon the actual extent and nature of the remediation required, the type of remedial process approved, the expenses of the regulatory process, inflation and other items. During 2003, the Company revised its estimate and recorded additional expense of approximately $300,000, primarily for amounts it expects it will pay to its consultants.
Otay Land Company is currently performing an investigation and preparing the required documentation in order to obtain approval of a remediation plan from the appropriate regulatory authority. The Company expects that it will be able to submit its remediation plan by the end of 2004. As it continues its investigation and develops its remediation plan, the Company may conclude that the current estimate of its liability needs to be adjusted. A change to the current estimate could result from, among other things, a conclusion that a different remediation alternative is more appropriate, that the cost to implement any remediation alternative is different than the Company's current estimate and/or requirements imposed by regulatory authorities that the Company did not anticipate but is nevertheless required to implement. The Company periodically adjusts its liability to reflect its current best estimate; however, no assurance can be given that the actual amount of environmental liability will not exceed the amount of reserves for this matter or that it will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Provision for Losses on Real Estate - The Company's real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. Management periodically assesses the recoverability of its real estate investments by comparing the carrying amount with their fair value less costs to sell. The process involved in the determination of fair value requires estimates as to future events and market conditions. This estimation process assumes the Company has the ability to complete development and dispose of its real estate properties in the ordinary course of business based on management's present plans and intentions. When management determines that the carrying value of specific real estate investments should be reduced to properly record these assets at fair value less costs to sell, this write-down is recorded as a charge to current period operations. The evaluation process is based on estimates and assumptions and the ultimate outcome may be different. The Company has not recorded any such provisions during the three year period ended December 31, 2003.
Statement of Operations
The Company currently has two significant real estate development projects, the San Elijo Hills project and the Otay Ranch project. The Company acquired the San Elijo Hills project in October 2002, and this acquisition accounts for the significant increase in 2003 revenues, cost of sales and profitability as compared to earlier periods. The San Elijo Hills project is a master-planned community that, when completed, will contain approximately 2,430 single family lots, 696 multi-family units, 272 very low income apartment units, three school sites and commercial space which will be sold or leased. Sales from the project commenced in 2000 (prior to the Company's acquisition), and after considering sales which closed in January 2004, approximately 736 single family lots, 42 multi-family units, 70 very low income apartment units (with minimal, if any profit potential), two school sites and commercial space remain to be sold or leased. The Company currently plans to complete its development of residential sites during 2004 and 2005, after which the remaining activity at the San Elijo Hills will be primarily concentrated on the commercial sites. These estimates of future property available for sale and the timing of the sales are derived from the current plans for the project, and could change based upon the actions of the project's home builders or regulatory agencies.
While the San Elijo Hills project is a development community with significant sales activity, sales at the Otay Ranch project have been limited to three individual transactions for relatively large amounts of land. Individual lot development at the Otay Ranch project has not yet begun, as the Company continues to evaluate how to maximize the value of this investment while pursuing land sales and processing further entitlements on portions of the property. If and when the Company determines to commence development at the Otay Ranch project, development activity is expected to last several years. Similarly, the Rampage property is not expected to have sales activity for several years. Approximately one-half of the property has been leased to another party for a minimum of five years, and any residential development at the property can only commence after approvals are obtained from several government agencies.
Real Estate Sales Activity
During 2003 and for the period from the acquisition of CDS through December 31, 2002, the Company recorded revenues from sales of real estate of approximately $121,100,000 and $5,000,000, respectively. For 2003, the Company closed on the sale of seven neighborhoods, consisting of 535 single family lots and 204 very low income apartment units for an aggregate purchase price of $133,400,000, net of closing costs. For 2002, the Company closed on the sale of one neighborhood consisting of 92 single family lots for an aggregate purchase price of $24,700,000. As discussed above, a portion of the revenue from these sales was deferred, and is recognized as revenues upon the completion of the required improvements to the property, including costs related to common areas, under the percentage of completion method of accounting. Included in revenues are previously deferred amounts of $19,000,000 and $1,400,000 for 2003 and 2002, respectively, which were recognized upon completion of certain required improvements.
Revenues from sales of real estate also include amounts received pursuant to profit sharing agreements with home builders of $5,500,000 during 2003. Additionally, revenues from sales of real estate in 2003 include approximately $3,000,000 paid by one of San Elijo's home builders for the Company's consent to allow the home builder to re-sell his lots to another home builder.
During 2003 and 2002, cost of sales of real estate aggregated $29,100,000 and $2,000,000, respectively. Cost of sales is recognized in the same proportion to the amount of revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting.
Sales of real estate during 2003 consist of $22,500,000 from the sale of 1,445 acres. For 2002, sales of real estate consist of $4,300,000 from the sale of 85 acres of developable land. There were no sales relating to this project in 2001.
During 2003 and 2002, cost of sales of real estate aggregated $4,800,000 and $800,000, respectively. Cost of sales is based upon the allocation of project costs to individual parcels, based upon their relative fair values, in addition to closing costs and commissions, if any.
During 2003, the Company disposed of all of its remaining interest in the Paradise Valley project and recognized pre-tax income of $1,500,000, net of $300,000 that was allocated to the minority interest. There were no sales relating to this project in 2002 or 2001.
Other Results of Operations Activity
The Company recorded co-op marketing and advertising fees of approximately $1,300,000, $1,900,000 and $1,000,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company records these fees when the San Elijo Hills project builders sell homes, and are generally based upon a fixed percentage of the homes' selling price.
Prior to the acquisition of CDS, the Company recognized development management fee income in its consolidated statements of operations. While development management fees have continued to be a source of liquidity to the parent company since the acquisition of CDS, they are no longer reflected in the consolidated statements of operations since they are intercompany payments from a subsidiary and are eliminated in consolidation. Development management fee income from the San Elijo Hills project was approximately $1,600,000 for the period from January 1, 2002 to October 21, 2002 and $4,800,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in 2002 primarily reflects lower field overhead and management services fees, due to reduced sales of real estate at the San Elijo Hills project in 2002, and the cessation of recognizing such fee income from the date of acquisition of CDS.
Income from options on real estate properties reflects non-refundable fees of approximately $300,000 and $700,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively, received to extend the closing date on the sale of the 85 acres of developable land at the Otay Ranch project, which closed in June 2002.
As more fully discussed above, in 2002, the Company recorded a provision of approximately $11,200,000, representing its estimated cost of environmental remediation. During 2003, the Company revised its estimate and recorded additional expense of approximately $300,000, primarily for amounts it expects it will pay to its consultants.
Interest expense reflects the interest due on indebtedness to Leucadia of approximately $1,600,000, $1,700,000 and $1,600,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Interest expense also includes amortization of debt discount related to the indebtedness to Leucadia of $1,100,000, $1,100,000 and $1,000,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
General and administrative expenses increased during 2003 as compared to 2002 due to expenses of $1,500,000 related to CDS. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to greater expenses related to employee compensation and legal and professional fees. The increase in legal and professional fees principally reflects costs associated with the Otay Ranch project, including costs incurred in connection with the eminent domain proceedings by the City of Chula Vista discussed above, and expenses related to the Company's reverse/forward split. In addition, general and administrative expenses include a charge in 2003 for previously deferred stock compensation expense of $600,000, which related to certain performance options which were no longer subject to forfeiture, and to an increase in the market price of the Company's common stock.
General and administrative expenses increased in 2002 as compared to 2001 primarily due to expenses of $400,000 related to CDS, greater legal and professional fees, increased stock compensation expense and increased salaries. The increase in legal and professional fees principally reflects costs associated with the Otay Ranch project and expenses related to acquisition opportunities. The increase in stock compensation expense related to performance options granted in 2000 reflects the appreciation of the Company's stock price in 2002.
The increase in other income for 2003 as compared to 2002 primarily relates to greater interest income resulting from a larger amount of invested assets, income from the reimbursement for improvement costs that were previously expensed at the San Elijo Hills project, proceeds from an easement at the Otay Ranch project and cash received to settle a dispute with one of the Company's vendors. These increases were partially offset by the gain on a sale of a foreclosed property in 2002. The decrease in other income in 2002 as compared to 2001 primarily relates to a reimbursement in 2001 for fees and improvements totaling approximately $700,000 related to property previously sold, partially offset by increased interest income, the gain on a sale of a foreclosed property and proceeds received upon the dissolution of a partnership in excess of its recorded investment balance.
The increase in minority interest expense for 2003 as compared to 2002 is primarily due to the minority interest related to CDS and increased preferred capital interest related to Otay Ranch (prior to its redemption in 2003). The increase in minority expense in 2002 as compared to 2001 relates to minority interest of CDS.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, as a result of an increase in the Company's estimate of future taxable income and actual income in 2003 that exceeded its earlier estimate, the Company reduced its income tax valuation allowance to recognize additional benefits from its NOLs and recorded a credit to its income tax provision of $26,065,000. Income taxes paid for 2002 principally relate to state income taxes, reduced by a refund of prior year federal alternative minimum tax payments. Income taxes for 2001 principally relate to the payment of federal alternative minimum tax and state income tax. In 2002, the Company did not recognize income tax benefits for its losses due to the uncertainty of sufficient future taxable income which is required in order to recognize such tax benefits. For more information, see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity ("SFAS 150"), which is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The implementation of SFAS 150 did not have any impact on the Company.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities, which are entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and for variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. In October 2003, the FASB deferred to the fourth quarter of 2003 from the third quarter the implementation date of FIN 46 with respect to variable interest entities in which a variable interest was acquired before February 1, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision ("FIN 46R") to FIN 46 to clarify certain provisions and exempt certain entities from its requirements. In addition, FIN 46R deferred to the first quarter of 2004 application of its provisions to certain entities in which a variable interest was acquired prior to February 1, 2003. The Company does not believe that the implementation of FIN 46 and FIN 46R will have any impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
Inflation
The Company, as well as the real estate development and homebuilding industry in general, may be adversely affected by inflation, primarily because of either reduced rates of savings by consumers during periods of low inflation or higher land and construction costs during periods of high inflation. Low inflation could adversely affect consumer demand by limiting growth of savings for down payments, ultimately adversely affecting demand for real estate and the Company's revenues. High inflation increases the Company's costs of labor and materials. The Company would attempt to pass through to its customers any increases in its costs through increased selling prices. To date, high or low rates of inflation have not had a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. However, there is no assurance that high or low rates of inflation will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's future results of operation.
Interest Rates
The Company's operations are interest-rate sensitive. The Company has indirectly benefited from the prevailing low mortgage interest rate environment, since low rates made housing more affordable for the home buyer, thereby increasing demand for homes. The Company can not predict whether interest rates will remain low and what impact an increase in interest rates and mortgage rates would have on the Company's operations, although any significant increase in these rates could have a chilling effect on the housing market, which could adversely affect the Company's results of operations.
Cautionary Statement for Forward-Looking Information
Statements included in this Report may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements may relate, but are not limited, to projections of revenues, income or loss, plans for growth and future operations, competition and regulation as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. When used in this Report, the words "estimates," "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "intends" and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements.
In addition to risks set forth in the Company's other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from any results projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted:
o Changes in prevailing interest rate levels, including mortgage rates. Any significant increase in the prevailing low mortgage interest rate environment could reduce consumer demand for housing.
o Changes in domestic laws and government regulations or requirements and in implementation and/or enforcement of governmental rules and regulations. The Company's plans for its development projects require numerous governmental approvals, licenses, permits and agreements, which must be obtained before development and construction may commence. The approval process can be delayed by withdrawals or modifications of preliminary approvals, by litigation and appeals challenging development rights and by changes in prevailing local circumstances or applicable laws that may require additional approvals.
o Changes in real estate pricing environments. Any significant decrease in the prevailing price of real estate in the geographic areas in which the Company owns, develops and sells real estate may adversely affect the Company's results of operations.
o Regional or general increases in cost of living. Any significant increases in the prevailing prices of goods and services that result in increased costs of living, particularly in the regions in which the Company is currently developing properties, may adversely affect consumer demand for housing.
o Demographic and economic changes in the United States generally and California in particular. The Company's operations are sensitive to demographic and economic changes. Any economic downturn in the United States in general, and California in particular, may adversely affect consumer demand for housing by limiting the ability of people to save for down payments and purchase homes. In addition, if the current trend of population increases in California were not to continue, demand for real estate in California may not be as robust as current levels indicate.
o Increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees. Any such increases may make it more expensive to own the properties that the Company is currently developing, which would increase the carrying costs to the Company of owning the properties and decrease consumer demand for them.
o Significant competition from other real estate developers and homebuilders. There are numerous residential real estate developers and development projects operating in the same geographic area in which the Company operates. Many of the Company's competitors may have advantages over the Company, including greater financial resources and/or access to cheaper capital.
o Decreased consumer spending for housing. Any decrease in consumer spending for housing may directly affect the Company's results of operations.
o Delays in construction schedules and cost overruns. Any material delays could adversely affect the Company's ability to complete its projects, significantly increasing the costs of doing so, including interests costs, or drive potential customers to purchase competitors' products. Cost overruns, if material, could have a direct adverse impact on the Company's results of operations.
o Availability and cost of land, materials and labor and increased development costs, many of which the Company would not be able to control. The Company's current and future development projects require the Company to purchase significant amounts of land, materials and labor. If the costs of these items increase, it will increase the costs to the Company of completing its projects; if the Company is not able to recoup these increased costs, its results of operations could be adversely affected.
o Damage to or condemnation of properties and occurrence of significant natural disasters and fires. Damage to or condemnation of any of the Company's properties, whether by natural disasters and fires or otherwise, may either delay or preclude the Company's ability to develop and sell its properties, or affect the price at which it may sell such properties.
o Imposition of limitations on the Company's ability to develop its properties resulting from environmental laws and regulations and developments in or new applications thereof. The residential real estate development industry is subject to increasing environmental, building, construction, zoning and real estate regulations that are imposed by various federal, state and local authorities. Environmental laws may cause the Company to incur additional costs, and adversely affect its ability to complete its projects in a timely and profitable manner.
o The inability to insure certain risks economically. The Company cannot be certain that it will be able to insure certain risks economically.
o The availability of adequate water resources and reliable energy source in the areas where the Company owns real estate projects. Any shortage of reliable water and energy resources and drop in consumer confidence in the dependability of such resources in areas where the Company owns land may adversely affect the values of properties owned by the Company and curtail development projects.
o Changes in the composition of the Company's assets and liabilities through acquisitions or divestitures. The Company may make future acquisitions or divestitures of assets. Any change in the composition of the Company's assets and liabilities as a result thereof could significantly affect the financial position of the Company and the risks that it faces.
o The actual cost of environmental liabilities concerning land owned in San Diego County, California exceeding the amount reserved for such matter. The actual cost of remediation of undeveloped land owned by a subsidiary could exceed the $10,800,000 reserved for such matter.
o The Company's ability to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have NOLs and other tax attributes, but may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize the deferred tax assets.
o The impact of inflation. The Company, as well as the real estate development and homebuilding industry in general, may be adversely affected by inflation, primarily because of either reduced rates of savings by consumers during periods of low inflation or higher land and construction costs during periods of high inflation.
Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
The Company's market risk arises principally from interest rate risk related to its investment portfolio and borrowing activities.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had investments of approximately $88,500,000 in securities issued by the U.S. government and its agencies. The Company's investment portfolio is classified as available for sale, and is reflected in the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected in shareholders' equity. The securities in the portfolio are rated "AAA" and "Aaa" by Standard & Poor's and Moody's, respectively. All of these fixed income securities mature in 2004; the estimated weighted average remaining life of these fixed income securities was approximately 0.2 years at December 31, 2003. These securities have a weighted average interest rate of 1.1% at December 31, 2003. The Company's fixed income securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase.
For additional information with respect to the Company's indebtedness, see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial Statements and supplementary data required by this Item 8 are set forth at the pages indicated in Item 15(a) below.
Not applicable.
(a) The Company's management evaluated, with the participation of the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")), as of December 31, 2003. Based on their evaluation, the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2003.
(b) There has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company's fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
The information to be included under the captions "Proposal for the Election of Directors" and "Information Concerning Board of Directors and Board Committees" in HomeFed's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the 1934 Act in connection with the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders of HomeFed (the "Proxy Statement") is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, reference is made to Item 10 in Part I of this Report.
The information to be included under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table summarizes information regarding the Company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2003. All outstanding awards relate to the Company's common stock.
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance Number of Securities Weighted-average under equity to be issued upon exercise price of compensation plans exercise of outstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securities warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a)) Plan Category (a) (b) (c) ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 120,250 $ 6.45 154,600 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders -- -- -- ------- ------ ------- Total 120,250 $ 6.45 154,600 ======== ====== ======= |
The information to be included under the caption "Present Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
The information to be included under the caption "Executive Compensation - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
The information to be included under the caption "Principal Accounting Fees and Services" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
(a)(1) Financial Statements. Report of Independent Auditors F-1 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 F-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. |
(a)(3) Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements.
1999 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Company's Proxy Statement dated November 22, 1999).
2000 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Annex B to the Company's Proxy Statement dated June 20, 2000).
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. None.
(c) Exhibits.
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as restated July 3, 1995 of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995).
3.2 By-laws of the Company as amended through December 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the "1999 10-K")).
3.3 Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, dated July 10, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002).
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002).
3.5 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2003.
3.6 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2003.
10.1 Security Agreement and Stock Pledge by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation dated as of July 3, 1995. 10.2 Development Management Agreement between the Company and Provence Hills Development Company, LLC, dated as of August 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 1998). 10.3 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Otay Land Company, LLC, dated as of September 20, 1999, between the Company and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-79901)). 10.4 Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000, between Leucadia Financial Corporation ("LFC"), the Company, HomeFed Resources Corporation and HomeFed Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000). 10.5 Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 1, 2000 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (the "2000 10-K")). 10.6 Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 28, 2001 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's 2000 10-K). 10.7 Amendment No. 3 dated as of December 31, 2001 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). 10.8 Third Amendment to Option and Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated as of June 21, 2002, by and between Otay Land Company, LLC and Lakes Kean Argovitz Resorts - California, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002). 10.9 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.10 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.11 Second Amendment and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of October 9, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.12 Second Amendment and Restated Variable Rate Secured Note dated as of October 9, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.13 Amended and Restated Line Letter dated as of October 9, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.14 Amended and Restated Term Note dated as of October 9, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.15 Amendment No. 4 dated as of May 28, 2002 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "2002 10-K/A")). 27 |
10.16 Amendment No. 5 dated as of November 15, 2002 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.17 Amendment dated as of October 21, 2002 to the Development Management Agreement dated as of August 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.18 Contribution Agreement between the Company and San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC, dated as of October 21, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.19 Agreement and Guaranty, dated as of October 1, 2002, between Leucadia National Corporation and CDS Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.20 Obligation Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2002, between Leucadia National Corporation and San Elijo Ranch, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.21 Tax Allocation Agreement between the Company and its subsidiaries dated as of November 1, 2002. 10.22 Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement and Owner Participation Agreement between the City of San Marcos, the San Marcos Redevelopment Agency and the San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC dated as of February 11, 2004. 10.23 Amendment No. 6 dated as of December 31, 2003 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000. 21 Subsidiaries of the Company. 31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
* Furnished herewith pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation S-K.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOMEFED CORPORATION
Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ ERIN N. RUHE --------------------------------- Erin N. Ruhe Vice President, Treasurer and Controller |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ JOSEPH S. STEINBERG --------------------------------- Joseph S. Steinberg, Chairman of the Board and Director Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ PAUL J. BORDEN --------------------------------- Paul J. Borden, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ ERIN N. RUHE --------------------------------- Erin N. Ruhe, Vice President, Treasurer and Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ PATRICK D. BIENVENUE --------------------------------- Patrick D. Bienvenue, Director Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ TIMOTHY CONSIDINE --------------------------------- Timothy Considine, Director Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ IAN M. CUMMING -------------------------------- Ian M. Cumming, Director Date: March 10, 2004 By /s/ MICHAEL A. LOBATZ -------------------------------- Michael A. Lobatz, Director |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number Description 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as restated July 3, 1995 of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995). 3.2 By-laws of the Company as amended through December 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the "1999 10-K")). 3.3 Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, dated July 10, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). 3.4 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). 3.5 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2003. 3.6 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated July 10, 2003. 10.1 Security Agreement and Stock Pledge by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation dated as of July 3, 1995. 10.2 Development Management Agreement between the Company and Provence Hills Development Company, LLC, dated as of August 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 1998). 10.3 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Otay Land Company, LLC, dated as of September 20, 1999, between the Company and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-79901)). 10.4 Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000, between Leucadia Financial Corporation ("LFC"), the Company, HomeFed Resources Corporation and HomeFed Communities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000). 10.5 Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 1, 2000 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (the "2000 10-K")). 10.6 Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 28, 2001 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's 2000 10-K). 10.7 Amendment No. 3 dated as of December 31, 2001 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). 10.8 Third Amendment to Option and Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated as of June 21, 2002, by and between Otay Land Company, LLC and Lakes Kean Argovitz Resorts - California, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002). 30 |
10.9 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.10 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.11 Second Amendment and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of October 9, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.12 Second Amendment and Restated Variable Rate Secured Note dated as of October 9, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.13 Amended and Restated Line Letter dated as of October 9, 2002, by and between HomeFed Corporation and Leucadia Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.14 Amended and Restated Term Note dated as of October 9, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2002). 10.15 Amendment No. 4 dated as of May 28, 2002 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "2002 10-K/A")). 10.16 Amendment No. 5 dated as of November 15, 2002 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.17 Amendment dated as of October 21, 2002 to the Development Management Agreement dated as of August 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.18 Contribution Agreement between the Company and San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC, dated as of October 21, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.19 Agreement and Guaranty, dated as of October 1, 2002, between Leucadia National Corporation and CDS Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.20 Obligation Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2002, between Leucadia National Corporation and San Elijo Ranch, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of the 2002 10-K/A). 10.21 Tax Allocation Agreement between the Company and its subsidiaries dated as of November 1, 2002. 10.22 Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement and Owner Participation Agreement between the City of San Marcos, the San Marcos Redevelopment Agency and the San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC dated as of February 11, 2004. 10.23 Amendment No. 6 dated as of December 31, 2003 to the Administrative Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000. 21 Subsidiaries of the Company. 31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
* Furnished herewith pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation S-K.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of HomeFed Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HomeFed Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 3, 2004
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)
2003 2002 ---- ---- ASSETS Real estate $ 37,612 $ 31,108 Cash and cash equivalents 43,503 33,601 Restricted cash 4,609 273 Investments-available for sale (aggregate cost of $88,503) 88,519 -- Deposits and other assets 995 753 Deferred income taxes 41,772 44,742 Note receivable -- 6,566 ---------- ---------- TOTAL $ 217,010 $ 117,043 ========== ========== LIABILITIES Note payable to Leucadia Financial Corporation $ 24,716 $ 23,628 Notes payable to trust deed holders 13,580 16,704 Deferred revenue 53,491 32,621 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 10,985 6,323 Liability for environmental remediation 10,785 10,816 Income taxes payable 503 2,875 Other liabilities 13,509 7,294 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities 127,569 100,261 ---------- ---------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES MINORITY INTEREST 13,111 15,132 ---------- ---------- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 8,155,159 and 8,155,084 shares outstanding 82 82 Additional paid-in capital 380,545 380,364 Deferred compensation pursuant to stock incentive plans (4) (418) Accumulated other comprehensive income 9 -- Accumulated deficit (304,302) (378,378) ---------- ---------- Total stockholders' equity 76,330 1,650 ---------- ---------- TOTAL $ 217,010 $ 117,043 ========== ========== |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- REVENUES Sales of real estate $ 147,028 $ 9,259 $ -- Co-op marketing and advertising fees 1,257 1,942 1,028 Development management fee income from San Elijo Hills -- 1,610 4,775 Income from options on real estate properties -- 300 720 --------- --------- --------- 148,285 13,111 6,523 --------- --------- --------- EXPENSES Cost of sales 35,508 2,815 -- Provision for environmental remediation 270 11,160 -- Interest expense relating to Leucadia Financial Corporation 2,676 2,780 2,646 General and administrative expenses 12,001 5,543 4,179 Administrative services fees to Leucadia Financial Corporation 120 120 107 --------- --------- --------- 50,575 22,418 6,932 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from operations 97,710 (9,307) (409) --------- --------- --------- Other income 1,706 311 699 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest 99,416 (8,996) 290 Income tax provision (14,179) (379) (667) --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) before minority interest 85,237 (9,375) (377) Minority interest (11,161) (1,711) (1,000) --------- --------- --------- Net income (loss) $ 74,076 $ (11,086) $ (1,377) ========= ========= ========= Basic income (loss) per common share $ 9.08 $ (1.80) $ (0.24) ========= ========= ========= Diluted income (loss) per common share $ 8.99 $ (1.80) $ (0.24) ========= ========= ========= |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)
Deferred Common Compensation Accumulated Total Stock Additional Pursuant to Other Stockholders $.01 Par Paid-in Stock Comprehensive Accumulated Equity Value Capital Incentive Plans Income Defecit (Defecit) ------- ------- --------------- ------------ ---------- --------- Balance, January 1, 2001 $ 57 $ 355,788 $ (351) $ -- $ (365,915) $ (10,421) --------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss (1,377) (1,377) --------- Amortization of restricted stock grants 63 63 Amortization related to stock options 112 112 Change in value of performance-based stock options 100 (100) -- ------ --------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balance, December 31, 2001 57 355,888 (276) -- (367,292) (11,623) --------- Comprehensive loss: Net loss (11,086) (11,086) --------- Issuance of 2,474,226 shares of common stock 25 23,975 24,000 Amortization of restricted stock grants 63 63 Amortization related to stock options 295 295 Change in value of performance-based stock options 500 (500) -- Exercise of options to purchase common shares 1 1 ------ ------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balance, December 31, 2002 82 380,364 (418) -- (378,378) 1,650 --------- Comprehensive income: Net change in unrealized gain on investments, net of taxes of $7 9 9 Net income 74,076 74,076 --------- Comprehensive income 74,085 --------- Amortization of restricted stock grants 11 11 Amortization related to stock options 583 583 Change in value of performance-based stock options 180 (180) -- Exercise of options to purchase common shares 1 1 ------ ------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------- Balance, December 31, 2003 $ 82 $ 380,545 $ (4) $ 9 $(304,302) $ 76,330 ====== ========= ======= ========== ========= ========= |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(In thousands)
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) $ 74,076 $ (11,086) $ (1,377) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Minority interest 11,161 1,711 1,000 Provision for deferred income taxes 2,963 363 -- Provision for environmental remediation 270 11,160 -- Amortization of deferred compensation pursuant to stock incentive plans 594 358 175 Amortization of the debt discount on note payable to Leucadia Financial Corporation 1,088 1,120 1,034 Other amortization related to investments (369) -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Real estate (542) (6,855) (911) Deposits and other assets (242) 169 (252) Note receivable 6,566 (6,566) -- Notes payable to trust deed holders (1,268) (185) -- Liability for environmental remediation (301) (344) -- Recreation center liability -- -- (41) Deferred revenue 20,870 19,792 -- Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,662 183 195 Income taxes payable (2,372) 286 -- Other liabilities 1,883 6,480 -- --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 119,039 16,586 (177) --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchases of investments (other than short-term) (152,132) -- -- Proceeds from maturities of investments 60,600 -- -- Proceeds from sales of investments 3,398 -- -- Net cash received in acquisition of CDS -- 18,979 -- Increase in restricted cash (4,336) -- -- --------- --------- --------- Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities (92,470) 18,979 -- --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Borrowings under credit agreement with Leucadia Financial Corporation -- 2,150 900 Payments related to credit agreement with Leucadia Financial Corporation -- (2,150) (900) Contribution from minority interest 43 -- -- Distributions to minority interest (13,469) (2,524) -- Principal payments to trust deed note holders (3,242) (895) -- Exercise of options to purchase common shares 1 1 -- --------- --------- --------- Net cash used for financing activities (16,667) (3,418) -- --------- --------- --------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,902 32,147 (177) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 33,601 1,454 1,631 --------- --------- --------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $ 43,503 $ 33,601 $ 1,454 ========= ========= ========= (continued) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(In thousands)
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid for interest $ 1,588 $ 1,660 $ 1,612 ========= ========= ========= Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes $ 10,976 $ (279) $ 668 ========= ========= ========= NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Common stock issued for acquisition of CDS $ -- $ 24,000 $ -- ========= ========= ========= NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Liabilities assumed from acquisition of real estate $ 4,332 $ -- $ -- 244 -- -- Contribution of real estate from minority interest --------- --------- -------- $ 4,576 $ -- $ -- ========= ========= ========= |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation - The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of HomeFed Corporation (the "Company"), Otay
Land Company, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, ("Otay Land Company"),
HomeFed Communities, Inc., HomeFed Resources Corporation, CDS Holding
Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries ("CDS") and Rampage Vineyard,
LLC. The Company is currently engaged, directly and through its subsidiaries, in
the investment in and development of residential real estate properties in the
state of California. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company's business, real estate development, is highly competitive, and there are numerous residential real estate developers and development projects operating in the same geographic area in which the Company operates. In addition, the residential real estate development industry is subject to increasing environmental, building, zoning and real estate regulations that are imposed by various federal, state and local authorities. Timing of the initiation and completion of development projects depends upon receipt of necessary authorizations and approvals. Furthermore, changes in prevailing local circumstances or applicable laws may require additional approvals, or modifications of approvals previously obtained. Delays could adversely affect the Company's ability to complete its projects, significantly increase the costs of doing so or drive potential customers to purchase competitors' products. Environmental laws may cause the Company to incur substantial compliance, mitigation and other costs, may restrict or prohibit development in certain areas and may delay completion of the Company's development projects. Delays arising from compliance with environmental laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company's ability to complete its projects, significantly increase the costs of doing so or cause potential customers to purchase competitors' products. The Company's business may also be adversely affected by inflation and is interest-rate sensitive.
On July 14, 2003, following shareholder approval, the Company effected a reverse 1-for-250 stock split (the "reverse split") followed immediately by a forward 25-for-1 stock split (the "forward split") of its common stock, which had the net effect of a reverse 1-for-10 stock split (the "reverse/forward split"). Holders of fewer than 250 shares of common stock prior to the reverse split and holders of fractional interests in common stock following the forward split received a cash payment for the value of their fractional interests. The Company's transfer agent aggregated all fractional interests and sold them at prevailing market prices. Because the net result of the reverse/forward stock split effectively was a reverse 1-for-10 stock split, the Company also proportionately reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock to 25,000,000. The trading symbol for the Company's common stock, which continues to trade in the over-the-counter bulletin board, was changed to "HOFD" effective July 14, 2003. In addition, in July 2003, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment to its certificate of incorporation to create a class of preferred stock, of which 3,000,000 shares are authorized and none have been issued. The financial statements and notes thereto give retroactive effect to the reverse/forward stock split for all periods presented.
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to be consistent with the 2003 presentation.
Critical Accounting Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates all of these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Profit Recognition on Sales of Real Estate - Profit from the sale of real estate is recognized in full at the time title is conveyed to the buyer if the profit is determinable, collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured (demonstrated by meeting minimum down payment and continuing investment requirements), and the earnings process is virtually complete, such that the seller is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale and has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership. If it is determined that all the conditions for full profit recognition have not been met, revenue and profit is deferred using the deposit, installment, cost recovery or percentage of completion method of accounting, as appropriate depending upon the specific terms of the transaction.
When the Company has an obligation to complete improvements on property subsequent to the date of sale, it utilizes the percentage of completion method of accounting to record revenues and cost of sales. Under percentage of completion accounting, the Company recognizes revenues and cost of sales based upon the ratio of development costs completed as of the date of sale to an estimate of total development costs which will ultimately be incurred, including an estimate for common areas. Unearned revenues resulting from applying the percentage of completion accounting are reported as deferred revenue in the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheets.
Income Taxes - The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax asset to an amount that the Company expects is more likely than not to be realized. If the Company's estimate of the realizability of its deferred tax asset changes in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded which would either increase or decrease income tax expense in such period. The valuation allowance is determined after considering all relevant facts and circumstances, but is significantly influenced by the Company's projection of taxable income in the future. Since any projection of future profitability is inherently unreliable, changes in the valuation allowance should be expected.
Provision for Environmental Remediation - The Company records environmental liabilities when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount or range of the liability is reasonably estimable. During 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $11,200,000 representing its estimate of the cost to implement the most likely remediation alternative with respect to 34 acres of undeveloped land owned by a subsidiary of Otay Land Company. The estimated liability was neither discounted nor reduced for potential claims for recovery from previous owners and users of the land who may be liable, and may increase or decrease based upon the actual extent and nature of the remediation required, the type of remedial process approved, the expenses of the regulatory process, inflation and other items.
Provision for Losses on Real Estate - The Company's real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. Management periodically assesses the recoverability of its real estate investments by comparing the carrying amount with their fair value less costs to sell. The process involved in the determination of fair value requires estimates as to future events and market conditions. This estimation process assumes the Company has the ability to complete development and dispose of its real estate properties in the ordinary course of business based on management's present plans and intentions. When management determines that the carrying value of specific real estate investments should be reduced to properly record these assets at fair value less costs to sell, this write-down is recorded as a charge to current period operations. The evaluation process is based on estimates and assumptions and the ultimate outcome may be different. The Company has not recorded any such provisions during the three year period ended December 31, 2003.
Real Estate -Real estate, which consists of land held for development and sale, includes all expenditures incurred in connection with the acquisition, development and construction of the property, including interest and property taxes. Land costs are allocated to lots based on relative fair values prior to development and are charged to cost of sales at the time of sale.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents are money market accounts and short-term, highly liquid investments that have maturities of less than three months at the time of acquisition.
Investments - Securities with maturities equal to or greater than three months at the time of acquisition are classified as investments available for sale, and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a separate component of shareholders' equity, net of taxes.
Recognition of Fee Income - The Company receives co-op marketing and advertising fees from the San Elijo Hills project that are paid at the time builders sell homes, are generally based upon a fixed percentage of the homes' selling price, and are recorded as revenue when the home is sold. Prior to its acquisition of CDS, the Company recognized fee income for field overhead and management services from the San Elijo Hills project in its consolidated statements of operations when contractually earned. Subsequent to the acquisition of CDS, such amounts are eliminated in consolidation.
Capitalization of Interest and Real Estate Taxes - Interest and real estate taxes attributable to land and property construction are capitalized and added to the cost of those properties while the properties are being actively developed.
Stock-Based Compensation - Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", ("SFAS 123"), establishes a fair value method for accounting for stock-based compensation plans, either through recognition in the statements of operations or disclosure. As permitted, the Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the statements of operations related to employees and directors under its stock compensation plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's fixed stock options been recorded in the statements of operations consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company's net income (loss) would not have been materially different from that reported in 2003, 2002 and 2001.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity ("SFAS 150"), which is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The implementation of SFAS 150 did not have any impact on the Company.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities, which are entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and for variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. In October 2003, the FASB deferred to the fourth quarter of 2003 from the third quarter the implementation date of FIN 46 with respect to variable interest entities in which a variable interest was acquired before February 1, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision ("FIN 46R") to FIN 46 to clarify certain provisions and exempt certain entities from its requirements. In addition, FIN 46R deferred to the first quarter of 2004 application of its provisions to certain entities in which a variable interest was acquired prior to February 1, 2003. The Company does not believe that the implementation of FIN 46 and FIN 46R will have any impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On October 21, 2002, the Company purchased from Leucadia National Corporation ("Leucadia") all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of CDS which, through its majority-owned indirect subsidiary, San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC ("San Elijo"), is the owner of the San Elijo Hills project, a master-planned community located in the City of San Marcos, in San Diego County, California. Since August 1998, the Company has been the development manager for the San Elijo Hills project, for which it was entitled to participate in the net cash flow of the project through the payment of a success fee, and receive fees for the field overhead, management and marketing services it provides, based on the revenues of the project. No success fee had been paid prior to the Company's acquisition of CDS.
The purchase price of $25,000,000 consisted of $1,000,000 in cash and 2,474,226 shares of the Company's common stock, which represented approximately 30% of the Company's outstanding common shares. Prior to the acquisition, Leucadia had also committed to continue to provide to San Elijo project improvement bonds which are required prior to the commencement of any project development. The results of CDS have been included in the Company's consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition.
The balance sheet of CDS at the date of acquisition was as follows (in thousands):
Assets: Real estate $ 139 Cash and cash equivalents 19,979 Investments 275 Deposits and other assets 460 Deferred income taxes 45,105 -------- Total assets acquired 65,958 -------- Liabilities: Notes payable to trust deed holders 17,560 Deferred revenue 12,829 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,429 Other liabilities 3,403 -------- Total liabilities assumed 38,221 -------- Minority Interest 2,737 -------- Purchase Price $ 25,000 ======== |
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents results for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the respective periods (in thousands, except per share amounts):
2002 2001 ---- ---- Sales of real estate $33,920 $80,721 Total revenues $36,162 $82,469 Income (loss) from operations $(2,441) $26,139 Minority interest $(2,124) $(3,337) Net income (loss) $(3,110) $14,505 Basic earnings (loss) per common share $(.38) $1.78 Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $(.38) $1.78 |
The unaudited pro forma financial information is provided for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of either the Company's operating results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the respective periods, or of the Company's future operating results.
In November 2003, the Company purchased a 2,159 acre grape vineyard located in southern Madera County, California ("Rampage"). The purchase price for the property was $6,000,000, excluding expenses, of which $1,700,000 was paid in cash and $4,300,000 is expected to be paid to the seller within one year. In addition, the Company furnished to the seller a letter of credit (which is fully collateralized by cash) in the amount of $4,300,000, which secured the Company's obligation to the seller. The Rampage property remains encumbered by a mortgage lien of $3,800,000, which was originally granted by the seller to a mortgage lender and which the Company is not obligated to satisfy. Although the amount owed to the seller does not bear interest, the Company is obligated to make interest payments due under the mortgage during 2004 while the lien remains on the property. However, any principal payments made by the Company to the mortgage lender will reduce the balance owed to the seller. If the lien remains outstanding for all of 2004, the total amount of interest the Company will be required to pay is approximately $300,000. By the end of 2004, the Company will either fully pay the amount it owes to the seller and have the mortgage lien released, or assume the mortgage lien or repay the mortgage, which in both instances will be fully offset by a reduction in the amount owed to the seller.
3. INVESTMENTS
At December 31, 2003, the Company's investments consisted of fixed income securities issued by the U.S. government and its agencies, which were classified as available for sale and recorded at an aggregate fair value of $88,519,000. At December 31, 2003, these investments had an aggregate amortized cost of $88,503,000 and the Company had recognized gross unrealized gains of $16,000 for these securities. All of the Company's investments mature in one year or less. The Company did not own any investments at December 31, 2002.
4. REAL ESTATE
A summary of real estate by project is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, ------------------------- 2003 2002 ---- ---- Otay Ranch $21,555 $23,856 San Elijo Hills 9,664 6,023 Rampage Vineyard 6,393 -- Paradise Valley -- 1,229 ------- ------- Total $37,612 $31,108 ======= ======= |
Interest totaling $1,386,000 and $224,000, related to the San Elijo Hills project, was incurred and capitalized in real estate during 2003 and 2002, respectively. All of the San Elijo Hills project land is pledged as collateral for the notes payable to trust deed holders described in Note 6, below.
During 2003, the Company disposed of all of its remaining interest in Paradise Valley for net cash proceeds of $2,900,000, and recognized pre-tax income of $1,500,000, net of $300,000 allocated to the minority interest.
5. NOTE RECEIVABLE
In December 2002, CDS sold 92 residential sites at the San Elijo Hills project to a home builder for net proceeds of $23,657,000, consisting of cash of $17,091,000 and a non-interest bearing note receivable in the amount of $6,566,000, due upon the completion of certain improvements to the property, but not to exceed one year. The note was paid in full during 2003.
6. INDEBTEDNESS
As of August 14, 1998, the Company and Leucadia Financial Corporation ("LFC"), a subsidiary of Leucadia, entered into an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement pursuant to which the Company and LFC amended the original loan agreement dated July 3, 1995 and restructured the Company's outstanding 12% Secured Convertible Note due 2003 ("Convertible Note") held by LFC. The restructured note dated August 14, 1998 (the "Restructured Note") has a principal amount of $26,462,000, extended the maturity date from July 3, 2003 to December 31, 2004, reduced the interest rate from 12% to 6% and eliminated the convertibility feature of the Convertible Note. The Restructured Note is collateralized by a security interest in substantially all assets of the borrower, whether now owned or hereafter acquired. No principal payments are due under the Restructured Note until its maturity date. On October 9, 2002, the maturity date of this note was extended from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2007 and the interest rate was increased to 9% for 2005, 10% for 2006 and 11% for 2007. The effective interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 11.1%, after giving effect to the amortization of the discount on the note. In connection with these amendments, in 2002, the Company paid LFC a $250,000 fee.
As a result of the restructuring of the Convertible Note, the Restructured Note was recorded at fair value and the approximate $7,015,000 difference between the fair value of the Restructured Note and the carrying value of the Convertible Note was reflected as additional paid-in capital. The Company has been amortizing this difference as interest expense based on a retirement date of December 31, 2005 using the interest method. Approximately $1,100,000, $1,100,000 and $1,000,000 were amortized to interest expense during 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Additional interest of approximately $1,600,000 was expensed and paid during each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003.
On March 3, 2004, the Board determined to prepay the Restructured Note in full. The Company expects to repay the note in late March 2004, using its available cash. Since the note is reflected in the December 31, 2003 consolidated balance sheet net of a discount of $1,746,000, the entire discount will be reflected as an expense in the Company's 2004 consolidated statement of operations.
In March 2001, the Company entered into an unsecured $3,000,000 line of credit agreement with LFC. Loans outstanding under this line of credit bear interest at 10% per annum. Effective March 1, 2002, this agreement was amended to extend the maturity to February 28, 2007, although LFC had the right to terminate the line of credit on an annual basis. On October 9, 2002, the line of credit was increased from $3,000,000 to $10,000,000 and LFC's ability to terminate the line of credit prior to maturity was removed, unless the Company is in default. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, no amounts were outstanding under this facility. There was no interest expense for the line of credit during the year ended December 31, 2003. Interest expense includes approximately $72,000 and $24,000 for the line of credit during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Notes payable to trust deed holders consist of non-recourse promissory notes that mature on December 31, 2010, are non-interest bearing and are collateralized by the San Elijo Hills project land. When a portion of the San Elijo Hills project is sold, a specified amount is required to be paid to the note holder in order to obtain a release of their security interest in the land. Such amount is specified in the note agreements and takes into consideration prior note payments. In addition, depending upon the amount of payments made to release their security interest for prior sales, the notes may require minimum annual payments. The minimum annual payments are currently $269,000 for annual periods subsequent to 2003. The sum of all payments made under these notes, whether denominated as interest, principal or otherwise, cannot exceed approximately $42,100,000. As of December 31, 2003, $25,900,000 had been paid.
The notes payable to trust deed holders were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition of CDS, based on the estimated future payments discounted at 6.5%. The activity for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the period from October 21, 2002 through December 31, 2002 is as follows (in thousands):
2003 2002 ---- ---- Beginning balance $16,704 $17,560 Principal payments (3,242) (895) Interest added to principal 118 39 ------- ------- Ending balance $13,580 $16,704 ======= ======= |
At the end of each reporting period, the carrying amounts of the notes are compared to the most recent estimate of future payments. The difference is amortized prospectively using the effective interest rate method. The effective interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the period from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2002 was 9.3% and 6.5%, respectively. Effective January 1, 2004, the effective interest rate was 12.5%. Based on the Company's cash flow forecast, the expected payments to the trust deed holders that will be allocated to principal are as follows (in thousands): 2004 - $4,639; 2005 - $8,143; 2006 - $0 and 2007 - $798.
7. MINORITY INTEREST
Through its ownership of CDS, the Company owns 80% of the common stock of CDS Devco, Inc. ("Devco"), which in turns owns 85% of the common stock of San Elijo Ranch, Inc., ("SERI"). Pursuant to a stockholders' agreement with the holder of the minority interest in Devco, the Company is entitled to a 15% return on all funds advanced to Devco, compounded annually, plus the return of its capital, prior to the payment of any amounts to the minority shareholder. Once those amounts are paid, the minority shareholder is entitled to 20% of future cash flows, if any, distributed to shareholders. Pursuant to a stockholders' agreement with the holders of the minority interests in SERI, Devco loans funds to SERI and charges a 12% annual rate. Once this loan is fully repaid, the minority shareholders of SERI are entitled to 15% of future cash flows, if any, distributed to shareholders. As of December 31, 2003, approximately $13,100,000 has been accrued for the Devco and SERI minority interests.
In January 2004, a dividend of $50,000,000 was paid by the Company's subsidiary that owns the San Elijo Hills project, of which $40,500,000 was ultimately received by the Company and the balance was paid to the minority interests. As a result, all amounts advanced to the project were repaid and the preferred return due at the time the dividend was paid was fully satisfied.
As of December 31, 2002, approximately $11,700,000 had been accrued with respect to Leucadia's preferred capital interest and cumulative preferred return relating to Otay Land Company, as discussed in Note 13, below. In 2003, Otay Land Company paid approximately $12,900,000 to Leucadia to fully redeem its preferred capital interest and preferred return.
8. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Under the Company's 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), the Company may grant options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock to non-employee directors, certain non-employees and employees up to a maximum grant of 30,000 shares to any individual in a given taxable year. Pursuant to the plan, each director of the Company is automatically granted options to purchase 1,000 shares on the date on which the annual meeting of stockholders is held. In July 2003, following shareholder approval, the Plan was amended to, among other things, increase to 200,000 the number of shares of common stock that would be available under the Plan for issuance pursuant to stock options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights once the reverse/forward stock split was effected. The Plan provides for the issuance of options and rights at not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Options generally become exercisable in five equal instalments starting one year from the date of grant. No stock appreciation rights have been granted. During 2000, 25,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued to eligible participants, subject to certain forfeiture provisions. In connection with this issuance of restricted stock, the Company recorded deferred compensation of $188,000 representing the value of stock on the date of issuance based upon market price. This amount was amortized over the three year vesting period of the restricted stock. In addition, during 2000, options to purchase an aggregate of 2,500 shares of Common Stock were granted to non-employees at an exercise price of $7.50 per share (market price). In connection with this issuance, the Company recorded deferred compensation of $18,000 based upon the estimated fair value of these options at the time of grant, using the modified Black-Scholes model. This amount is being amortized over the five year vesting period of the options.
A summary of activity with respect to the Company's stock options for employees and directors for 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
Common Weighted Available Shares Average Options for Future Subject to Exercise Exercisable Option Option Price at Year-End Grants ------ ----- ----------- ------ Balance at January 1, 2001 16,100 $ 7.50 0 56,400 ====== ====== Granted 600 $ 9.30 Exercised (25) $ 7.00 ------ Balance at December 31, 2001 16,675 $ 7.50 3,225 55,800 ====== ====== Granted 600 $ 9.50 Exercised (50) $ 8.15 ------ Balance at December 31, 2002 17,225 $ 7.60 6,575 55,200 ====== ====== Granted 600 $ 27.40 Exercised (75) $ 8.60 ------ Balance at December 31, 2003 17,750 $ 8.28 10,050 199,400 ====== ====== ======= |
The weighted-average fair value of the options granted was $17.21 per share for 2003, $6.50 per share for 2002 and $7.30 per share for 2001 as estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) expected volatility of 86.1% for 2003, 95.5% for 2002 and 117.7% for 2001; (2) risk-free interest rate of 2.3% for 2003, 3.5% for 2002 and 4.8% for 2001; (3) expected lives of 4.0 years for all years; and (4) dividend yield of 0% for all years.
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003.
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Common Weighted Weighted Common Weighted Shares Average Average Shares Average Range of Subject to Remaining Exercise Subject to Exercise Exercise Prices Option Contractual Life Price Option Price --------------- ------ ---------------- ----- ------ ----- $7.00 - $9.50 17,150 2.2 years $ 7.61 10,050 $7.55 $27.40 600 4.5 years $27.40 -- $ -- |
In 2000, under the Company's 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2000 Plan"), the Company granted to two key employees options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.10 per share, the then current market price per share. No additional options are available to be granted under the 2000 Plan. These options were subject to forfeiture provisions if performance criteria were not met by April 27, 2003. Upon the closing of a sale at Otay Land Company in April 2003, the options were no longer subject to forfeiture. As a result, the Company expensed the remaining deferred compensation related to the performance options of approximately $600,000 in 2003.
9. OTHER RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, consists of the following (in thousands):
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- Interest income $ 883 $ 96 $ 21 Proceeds from settlements 346 -- -- Easement fees 172 -- -- Reimbursement for fees and improvements for previously sold property 198 -- 678 Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets -- 113 (5) Rental income from Leucadia 72 21 -- Other 35 81 5 ------- ------ ------ Total $ 1,706 $ 311 $ 699 ======= ====== ====== |
Advertising costs were $966,000, $159,000 and $41,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
10. INCOME TAXES
The (provision) benefit for income taxes for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 was as follows (in thousands):
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- State income taxes - current $ (8,977) $ (471) $ (172) Federal income taxes - current (2,239) 455 (495) Federal income taxes - deferred (2,963) (363) -- ---------- ------- ------- $ (14,179) $ (379) $ (667) ========== ======= ======= |
Current income taxes for all years principally relate to federal alternative minimum tax and state income tax. The December 31, 2002 income taxes payable balance includes approximately $2,600,000 due to Leucadia, which was paid in 2003, related to CDS's tax sharing agreement with Leucadia for periods prior to the Company's acquisition.
The table below reconciles the expected statutory federal income tax to the actual income tax (provision) benefit (in thousands):
2003 2002 2001 ---- ---- ---- Expected federal income tax $ (34,796) $ 3,149 $ (102) State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit (5,835) (306) (112) Federal alternative minimum tax refund (payment) -- 455 (495) Otay Land Company taxable income allocated to Leucadia 429 1,024 221 (Increase) decrease in valuation allowance 26,065 (4,701) -- Other (42) -- (179) --------- -------- ------- Actual income tax (provision) $ (14,179) $ (379) $ (667) ========= ======== ======= |
The Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") available for federal income tax purposes of $168,600,000 as of December 31, 2003. The NOLs were generated during 1991 to 1999 and expire in 2006 to 2019 as follows (in thousands):
Year of Expiration Loss Carryforwards ------------------ ------------------ 2004 $ -- 2005 -- 2006 104,570 2007 8,045 2008 9,361 Thereafter 46,586 ---------- $ 168,562 ========== |
These NOLs are not available to reduce federal alternative minimum taxable income, which is currently taxed at the rate of 20%. As a result, the Company will pay federal income tax at a rate of 20% during future periods (resulting in additional minimum tax credit carryovers), until such time as all of its NOLs are used or expire and all minimum tax credit carryovers are used. Alternative minimum tax credit carryovers have no expiration date.
At December 31, 2003 and 2002 the net deferred tax asset consisted of the following (in thousands):
2003 2002 ---- ---- NOL carryforwards $ 59,013 $ 84,368 Land basis 9,153 14,877 Minimum tax credit carryovers 2,239 -- Other, net 6,453 7,928 --------- --------- 76,858 107,173 Valuation allowance (35,086) (62,431) --------- --------- $ 41,772 $ 44,742 ========= ========= |
The valuation allowance has been provided on the deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of future taxable income necessary for realization of the deferred tax asset. The decrease in the valuation allowance primarily results from the recognition of additional tax benefits for the expected use of all of the NOLs. During the year ended December 31, 2003, as a result of an increase in the Company's estimate of future taxable income and actual income in 2003 that exceeded its earlier estimate, it reduced its income tax valuation allowance to recognize additional benefits from its net operating loss carryforwards and recorded a credit to its income tax provision of $26,065,000.
The calculation of the valuation allowance recognizes that the Company's NOLs will not be available to offset alternative minimum taxable income, which is currently taxed at a federal tax rate of 20%. When the Company pays alternative minimum tax, it generates an alternative minimum tax credit carryover, which can be used to reduce its future federal income tax rate once it has used all of its NOLs. Assuming the Company realizes its projected taxable income in the future and fully utilizes its NOLs, it will have approximately $35,000,000 of minimum tax credit carryovers to reduce future federal income taxes payable. However, the minimum tax credit carryovers are only able to reduce the Company's federal income tax rate to 20% in any given year, which means the Company would have to generate an additional $230,000,000 of taxable income above its current estimate to fully use them. As a result, the Company has reserved for substantially all of this benefit in its valuation allowance.
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Income (loss) per share of common stock was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and, for diluted earnings (loss) per share, the incremental weighted average number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options for the periods they were outstanding. The number of shares used to calculate basic earnings (loss) per share amounts was 8,155,111, 6,168,891, and 5,680,790 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings (loss) per share was 8,238,164, 6,168,891 and 5,680,790, respectively. Options to purchase 42,135 and 35,984 weighted average shares for 2002 and 2001, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share as those options were antidilutive.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Prior to its acquisition by the Company, a subsidiary of CDS entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for its office space, a portion of which was sublet to the Company and a portion of which was sublet to Leucadia. This lease will expire in February 2005, subject to an option to extend for an additional four years. In 2002, the base rent, which escalates 4% each year, was approximately $240,000. Effective October 21, 2002, as a result of the acquisition of CDS, the Company has recorded sublease income from Leucadia for a monthly amount equal to Leucadia's share of the Company's cost for such space and furniture, and reflected such amounts in other income. Such amount aggregated $72,000 in 2003 and $21,000 for the period from October 21, 2002 to December 31, 2002. Rental expense (net of sublease income) was $209,000, $227,000 and $246,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
In connection with the development of San Elijo Hills, CDS has provided a letter of credit in the amount of $273,000 which expires in 2004. The letter of credit is collateralized by a certificate of deposit in the same amount, which is reflected in restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
As described more fully in Note 2, the Company has posted a cash collateralized $4,300,000 letter of credit in connection with the acquisition of the Rampage property. The letter of credit expires in 2004. The cash collateral, which at December 31, 2003 totaled $4,300,000, is included in restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
An owner of adjacent property has claimed that he has options to purchase approximately 600 acres of the Rampage property for approximately $4,900,000. The Company is currently evaluating the merits of this claim and how it will proceed.
The Company is required to obtain infrastructure improvement bonds primarily for the benefit of the City of San Marcos (The "City") prior to the beginning of lot construction work and warranty bonds upon completion of such improvements in the San Elijo Hills project. These bonds provide funds primarily to the City in the event the Company is unable or unwilling to complete certain infrastructure improvements in the San Elijo Hills project. Leucadia has obtained these bonds on behalf of CDS and its subsidiaries both before and after the acquisition of CDS by the Company. CDS is responsible for paying all third party fees related to obtaining the bonds. Should the City or others draw on the bonds for any reason, one of CDS's subsidiaries would be obligated to reimburse Leucadia for the amount drawn. As of December 31, 2003, the amount of outstanding bonds was approximately $31,700,000.
Since 1999, the San Elijo Hills project has carried $50,000,000 of general liability and professional liability insurance under a policy issued by the Kemper Insurance Companies ("Kemper"). The policy covered a thirteen-year term from the initial date of coverage, and the entire premium for the life of the policy was paid in 1999. This policy is specific to the San Elijo Hills project; the Company has general and professional liability insurance for other matters with different insurance companies. Kemper has ceased underwriting operations and has submitted a voluntary run-off plan to its insurance regulators. Although Kemper is not formally in liquidation or under the supervision of insurance regulators, it is uncertain whether they will have sufficient assets at such time, if ever, the Company makes a claim under the policy or, if they are insolvent, whether state insurance guaranty funds would be available to pay the claim. The Company has investigated replacing the coverage supplied by Kemper with a new insurance company; however, the Company has not found coverage equal to that provided by Kemper and premium rates have increased significantly. At this time the Company has not yet determined whether it needs to obtain replacement insurance, and if it determines to do so, whether it will be able to acquire insurance that is economically acceptable, if at all, or whether such insurance will cover past occurrences at the San Elijo Hills project.
The Company is subject to various litigation which arise in the course of its business. Based on discussions with counsel, management is of the opinion that such litigation is not likely to have any material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company, its consolidated results of operations or liquidity.
13. OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into the following related party transactions with Leucadia and LFC not otherwise described in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a) Development Management Agreement. In August 1998, the Company entered into a development management agreement with an indirect subsidiary of Leucadia that owned certain real property located in the city of San Marcos, County of San Diego, California, to develop the San Elijo Hills project. The development management agreement provided that the Company would act as the development manager with responsibility for the overall management of the project, including arranging financing for the project, coordinating marketing and sales activity, and acting as the construction manager. The development management agreement also provided that the Company would participate in the net profits of the project through the payment of a success fee and fee income for field overhead, management and marketing services based on the revenues derived from the project. As a result of the acquisition of CDS on October 21, 2002, the Company acquired this indirect subsidiary of Leucadia. Subsequently, the development management agreement was amended to eliminate the success fee provisions. While development management fees have continued to be a source of liquidity for the parent company since the acquisition of CDS, they are no longer reflected in the consolidated statements of operations since they are intercompany payments from a subsidiary and are eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Otay Land Company, LLC. In October 1998, the Company and Leucadia formed Otay Land Company to purchase approximately 4,850 acres of land, which is part of a 22,900 acre project located south of San Diego, California, known as Otay Ranch. Otay Land Company acquired this land for $19,500,000. When Otay Land Company was formed, Leucadia contributed $10,000,000 as a preferred capital interest, and the Company contributed all other funds as non-preferred capital. The Company is the managing member of Otay Land Company. In 2003, Otay Land Company paid approximately $12,900,000 due to Leucadia to fully redeem the preferred capital interest and preferred return. All future proceeds from this project will be distributable solely to the Company.
(c) Administrative Services Agreement. Pursuant to administrative services agreements, LFC provides administrative services to the Company through December 31, 2004, including providing the services of one of the Company's executive officers. Administrative fees paid to LFC were $120,000 in 2003 and 2002 and $107,000 in 2001.
14. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's material financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, certificate of deposits, investments available for sale, and notes payable. In all cases, the carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their fair values. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value techniques.
15. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter ------- ------- ------- ------- (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2003: Sales of real estate $ 7,016 $ 78,444 $ 29,667 $ 31,901 ========== ========== ========== ======== Co-op marketing and advertising fees $ 380 $ 203 $ 249 $ 425 ========== ========== ========== ======== Cost of sales $ 2,340 $ 14,792 $ 8,002 $ 10,374 ========== ========== ========== ======== Income from operations $ 2,565 $ 60,524 $ 18,184 $ 16,437 ========== ========== ========== ======== Net income (a) $ 1,245 $ 33,743 $ 8,325 $ 30,763 ========== ========== ========== ======== Basic income per share (a) $ 0.15 $ 4.14 $ 1.02 $ 3.77 ========== ========== ========== ======== Diluted income per share (a) $ 0.15 $ 4.10 $ 1.01 $ 3.73 ========== ========== ========== ======== 2002: Sales of real estate $ -- $ 4,285 $ -- $ 4,974 ========== ========== ========== ======== Co-op marketing and advertising fees $ 470 $ 426 $ 600 $ 446 ========== ========== ========== ======== Development management fee income from San Elijo Hills $ -- $ 1,553 $ 57 $ -- ========== ========== ========== ======== Income from options on real estate properties $ 180 $ 120 $ -- $ -- ========== ========== ========== ======== Cost of sales $ -- $ 809 $ -- $ 2,006 ========== ========== ========== ======== Income (loss) from operations (b) $ (1,156) $ 3,750 $ (12,513) $ 612 ========== ========== ========== ======== Net income (loss) (b) $ (1,296) $ 3,101 $ (12,342) $ (549) ========== ========== ========== ======== Basic income (loss) per share (c) $ (0.23) $ 0.55 $ (2.17) $ (0.07) ========== ========== ========== ======== Diluted income (loss) per share (c) $ (0.23) $ 0.54 $ (2.17) $ (0.07) ========== ========== ========== ======== |
(a) The fourth quarter of 2003 reflects a reduction to the income tax provision of $26,065,000, resulting from a decrease to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, in order to recognize additional tax benefits for the expected use of NOLs.
(b) During the third quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a provision of $11,200,000 relating to environmental remediation.
(c) In 2002, the total of quarterly per share amounts does not equal the annual per share amount because of changes in outstanding shares during the year.
Exhibit 3.5
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HOMEFED CORPORATION
Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, HOMEFED CORPORATION does hereby certify:
1. The name of the corporation is HOMEFED CORPORATION (the "Corporation").
2. This Certificate of Amendment amends the provisions of the Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Restated Certificate of Incorporation").
3. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended as follows:
A. The first paragraph of Article 4 of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
"Article 4:
1. The total number of shares of stock that this corporation shall have authority to issue is twenty-eight million 28,000,000, of which 25,000,000 shall be common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 3,000,000 shall be preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, in each case with limited transferability as described in part B of this Article 4. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, from time to time, with each such series to consist of such number of shares and to have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such series adopted by the Board of Directors of this corporation, and the Board of Directors is hereby expressly vested with authority, to the full extent now or hereafter provided by law, to adopt any such resolution or resolutions. Issuance of authorized stock by this corporation shall be limited as described in part A of this Article 4.
2. Subject to the provisions of applicable law or of the by-laws of this corporation with respect to the closing of the transfer books or the fixing of a record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote, and except as otherwise provided by law or by the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of any series of preferred stock, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock shall exclusively possess the voting power for the election of directors and for all other purposes, each holder of record of shares of common stock being entitled to one vote for each share of common stock standing in his name on the books of this corporation."
B. Immediately prior to Article 5, the following Article 4A shall be inserted into the Restated Certificate of Incorporation:
"Article 4A
Without regard to any other provision of this
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, each one (1) share of common
stock, par value $.01 per share, of this corporation, either issued and
outstanding or held by the corporation as treasury stock, immediately
prior to the time this amendment becomes effective, shall, upon this
amendment becoming effective, be automatically reclassified and changed
(without any further act) into one-two-hundred-and-fiftieth (1/250th)
of a fully-paid and nonassessable share of common stock, par value $.01
per share, of this corporation, provided that no fractional shares
shall be issued to any holder of fewer than 250 shares of common stock
of this corporation immediately prior to the time this amendment
becomes effective, and that instead of issuing such fractional shares,
this corporation shall arrange for the disposition of fractional
interests by those entitled thereto, by the mechanism of having the
transfer agent of this corporation aggregate such fractional interests
and sell shares of common stock in respect thereof and distribute the
net proceeds received from the sale among the holders of the fractional
interests as their respective interests appear."
B. In all other respects, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall remain unchanged.
4. The foregoing amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation were duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
5. This Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation will become effective at 6:00 am, eastern time, on July 14, 2003.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its officer thereunto duly authorized this 10th day of July, 2003.
HOMEFED CORPORATION
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden ---------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
Exhibit 3.6
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HOMEFED CORPORATION
Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, HOMEFED CORPORATION does hereby certify:
1. The name of the corporation is HOMEFED CORPORATION (the "Corporation").
2. This Certificate of Amendment amends the provisions of the Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Restated Certificate of Incorporation").
3. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended as follows:
A. Article 4A of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
"Article 4A
Without regard to any other provision of this Restated Certificate of Incorporation, each one (1) share of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of this corporation, either issued and outstanding or held by this corporation as treasury stock (and including each fractional share in excess of one (1) share held by any stockholder and each fractional interest in excess of one (1) share held by this corporation or its agent pending disposition on behalf of those entitled thereto), immediately prior to the time this amendment becomes effective, shall, upon this amendment becoming effective, be automatically reclassified and changed (without any further act) into twenty-five (25) fully-paid and nonassessable shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of this corporation, (or, with respect to such fractional shares and interests, such lesser number of shares and fractional shares or interests as may be applicable based upon such 25-1 ratio), provided that no fractional shares shall be issued and that instead of issuing such fractional shares, this corporation shall arrange for the disposition of fractional interests by those entitled thereto, by the mechanism of having the transfer agent of this corporation aggregate such fractional interests and sell shares of common stock in respect thereof and distribute the net proceeds received from the sale among the holders of the fractional interests as their respective interests appear."
B. In all other respects, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall remain unchanged.
4. The foregoing amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
5. This Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation will become effective at 6:01 am, eastern time, on July 14, 2003.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its officer thereunto duly authorized this 10th day of July, 2003.
HOMEFED CORPORATION
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden ---------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
Exhibit 10.1
SECURITY AGREEMENT AND STOCK PLEDGE
THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT AND STOCK PLEDGE ("Stock Pledge") is entered into as of July 3, 1995, by and between HomeFed Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Borrower"), and Leucadia Financial Corporation, a Utah corporation ("Lender").
A. On October 22, 1992, Borrower filed in the United States Court for the Southern District of California (the "Bankruptcy Court"), a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which was later consolidated with an involuntary bankruptcy case initiated by certain holders of debentures on June 25, 1992, and is now assigned Case No. 92-07591-A11 (the "Bankruptcy Case").
B. Borrower filed a Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") in the Bankruptcy Case, which was approved by its creditors and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court by Order of Confirmation dated December 19, 1994 (which Confirmation Order was modified as of June 14, 1995), and this Stock Pledge is made in order to facilitate implementation of the Plan.
C. Upon effectiveness of the Plan, Lender will be the largest shareholder of Borrower. Lender worked with Borrower to create the Plan. It is in the best interest of Lender and Borrower to enter into this Stock Pledge, and to perform their other respective obligations under and otherwise act in compliance with the Plan.
D. Upon the "Effective Date" of the Plan, Lender shall loan to Borrower the sum of Twenty Million and 00/100 Dollars ($20,000,000) (the "Loan") pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement between Lender and Borrower ("Loan Agreement"), which the parties shall execute on the date first written above. The Loan shall be evidenced by a Promissory Note ("Note") to be held by Lender.
E. This Stock Pledge is made pursuant to the Plan and the Loan Agreement in order to provide security for timely repayment of the Loan evidenced by the Note, and the performance by Borrower of its obligations under the Loan Agreement.
F. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, Lender shall have the right to convert all or a portion of the Principal (as defined in the Loan Agreement) into Common Stock (as defined in the Loan Agreement). Any such conversion shall have no effect upon the enforceability of this Stock Pledge as it relates to the Obligations (defined below).
G. This Stock Pledge, together with the Plan, the Loan Agreement, the Note, the Payment Guaranties executed by each of the Subsidiaries (defined below), the Security Agreements securing the Payment Guaranties, the Deeds of Trust securing the performance of Borrower and the Subsidiaries, all related financing statements, and all documents referred to herein or in any of such other documents, are collectively referred to herein as the "Plan Documents."
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual agreements and promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Borrower and Lender agree as follows:
Section 1.
Upon the terms of this Stock Pledge, for value received, Borrower, whose name and mailing address are set forth above its signature at the foot of this Stock Pledge, grants to Lender a security interest in the Collateral (defined below), in order to secure the prompt payment and performance in full of the Obligations (defined below) owed to Lender.
Section 2.
The term "Collateral" as used in this Stock Pledge shall mean the property of Borrower described in both subparagraphs (a) and (b) below. Collateral shall consist of "Stock Collateral" and "Non-Stock Collateral", including any respective insurance payable by reason of loss or damage thereto, described as follows:
(a) Stock Collateral shall consist of all of Borrower's right,
title and interest in and to (i) 400 shares of the outstanding common stock of
HomeFed Communities, Inc., a California corporation ("HomeFed Communities"),
which shares constitute all of the outstanding shares of HomeFed Communities and
are represented by a certificate of HomeFed Communities, and any and all
securities now or hereafter issued in substitution, exchange or replacement
therefor, or with respect thereto, and any and all warrants, options or other
rights to subscribe to or acquire any additional stock or securities of HomeFed
Communities; (ii) 20 shares of the outstanding common stock of HomeFed Resources
Corporation, a California corporation ("HomeFed Resources"), which shares
constitute all of the outstanding shares of HomeFed Resources and are
represented by a certificate of HomeFed Resources, and any and all securities
now or hereafter issued in substitution, exchange or replacement therefor, or
with respect thereto, and any and all warrants, options or other rights to
subscribe to or acquire any additional stock or securities of HomeFed Resources;
(iii) any and all other securities, and any and all warrants, options, or other
rights to subscribe to or acquire securities; and (iv) the cash and noncash
proceeds of the foregoing, including dividends. Collectively, HomeFed
Communities and HomeFed Resources, together with Northfork Communities, a
California general partnership ("Northfork") and Paradise Valley Communities No.
1, a California general partnership ("Paradise Valley"), are referred to herein
as the "Subsidiaries."
(b) Non-Stock Collateral shall consist of all of Borrower's right, title and interest in and to any and all property of Borrower, including partnership interests, other than that described in subparagraph (a), acquired at any time, now existing or hereafter arising, and of any and all kinds whatsoever, real or personal, tangible or intangible, or otherwise, and including without limitation (i) accounts, deposit accounts, general intangibles, chattel paper, instruments (whether negotiable or non--negotiable), contract rights, and all rights of Borrower of every kind to the payment of money, (ii) all cash and cash equivalents, bank accounts (whether special or general), and collateral accounts, (iii) all equipment, furniture, fixtures, machinery, tools, tooling, goods, inventory, raw materials, work in process, finished goods and materials, and all accessories, parts, repossessions and returns thereto or therefor, (iv) the cash and noncash proceeds, products, increase, profits, additions, substitutions, replacements and accessions to, for, of, and from all of the foregoing, including all cash and noncash proceeds arising from the transfer of real property, and (v) all books and records of Borrower with respect to all of the foregoing.
Section 3.
The term "Obligations" as used in this Stock Pledge shall mean all present and/or future obligations of Borrower under the Loan Agreement and under the Note and of Borrower and the Subsidiaries under the other Plan Documents, and all other obligations of every kind or nature of Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries from time to time owed to Lender, whether due or to become due, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, contingent or noncontingent, including obligations of performance as well as obligations of payment and including, without limitation, any and all expenses (including, without limitation, counsel fees and expenses) incurred by Lender in enforcing its rights under the Plan Documents, as well as interest that accrues after the commencement of the bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding by or against Borrower.
Section 4.
Borrower warrants and represents and covenants that all of the following are true:
(a) Ownership of Collateral. Borrower owns all right, title and interest in and to, and has unrestricted power to encumber, all Collateral. The Bankruptcy Court has confirmed Borrower's authority to execute and deliver this Stock Pledge. No dispute, right of setoff, counterclaim, or defense exists with respect to any Collateral and no person other than Borrower and Lender has or claims any title, lien, encumbrance or other interest in any Collateral, except for (i) taxes not yet delinquent and (ii) any title, lien, encumbrance or interest disclosed in writing to Lender and to which Lender has consented in writing. No financing statement or deed of trust has been filed, and no other security agreement has been made, covering the Collateral or any part thereof, except as listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The delivery of any of the Collateral at any time by Borrower to Lender shall constitute a warranty and representation to the foregoing effect with respect to such Collateral.
(b) No Other Interests. There is no outstanding right, subscription, call, option or any agreement to acquire or otherwise receive from Borrower any portion of the Collateral except as provided in the Plan Documents.
(c) Perfection of Interest. This Stock Pledge and the filing of UCC-l Financing Statements with respect to the Collateral will create a valid, enforceable and, to the full extent permissible under the Utah Uniform Commercial Code (the "Commercial Code"), perfected security interest in the Collateral, securing the payment and performance of the Obligations.
(d) Authorization. Borrower has obtained any and all necessary consents, approvals and waivers as may be required by the Plan, the Plan Documents or otherwise for the pledge of or creation of a security interest in the Collateral pursuant hereto or for the execution, delivery or performance hereof by Borrower, or for the exercise by Lender of the rights provided for herein or the remedies in respect of the Collateral pursuant hereto.
(e) Execution. This Stock Pledge has been duly executed and delivered by Borrower and constitutes the legal, valid and binding agreement of Borrower enforceable against Borrower in accordance with its terms and conditions.
(f) Offices. The chief executive office of Borrower is, for now, located at 529 East South Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84012. Borrower has no other place of business. Borrower shall give Lender ten (10) days' prior written notice of any change of such office, or of the addition of any other office(s).
Section 5.
So long as any Obligation remains unpaid or unperformed, Borrower covenants and agrees to do all of the following:
(a) Preservation of Existence. Preserve and maintain its existence and good standing as a corporation in the state of Delaware, and qualify and remain qualified as a foreign corporation in California and each other jurisdiction in which the failure to qualify would have a material adverse effect on Borrower.
(b) Condition of and Title to Collateral. From time to time,
(1) promptly furnish Lender with any information or writings which Lender may
reasonably request concerning the Collateral; (ii) permit Lender to inspect at
reasonable hours all records of Borrower relating to the Collateral and to make
and take away copies of such records; (iii) promptly notify Lender of any change
in any fact or circumstances warranted or represented by Borrower in this Stock
Pledge or in any other writing furnished by Borrower to Lender in connection
with the Collateral or the Obligations; (iv) promptly notify Lender of any
claim, action, or proceeding affecting the Collateral, or any part thereof, or
any security interest therein, and, at the request of Lender, appear in and
defend, at Borrower's expense, any such action or proceeding; (v) pay to Lender
the amount of all court costs and attorneys' fees assessed by a court and
incurred by Lender following any default hereunder by Borrower; and (vi) except
to the extent prohibited by applicable law, pay any reasonable expenses incurred
in the custody, preservation, use, or operation of the Collateral.
(c) Preservation of Stock Collateral. At no time, without the prior written consent of Lender: (i) sell, assign, transfer or exchange Borrower's rights in the Stock Collateral; or (ii) create any other security interest in or otherwise encumber the Stock Collateral, or any part thereof, or permit the same to be or become subject to any lien attachment, execution, sequestration, other legal or equitable process, or any encumbrance of any kind or character, except the security interest herein.
(d) Preservation, Use and Location of Non-Stock Collateral.
Preserve, protect, and maintain all Non-Stock Collateral in good and salable
condition, other than any particular item that is of no material value, and (i)
use the Non-Stock Collateral lawfully, only in the ordinary business and
activities of Borrower and as permitted by insurance policies, (ii) keep all
Non-Stock Collateral at Borrower's chief executive office or at such other
location or locations as Lender may approve in writing, except in the case of
temporary removal for use in Borrower's business or for repairs, and keep all
Non-Stock Collateral separate and identifiable to the fullest extent possible,
(iii) promptly notify Lender of any claim, action, or proceeding affecting any
Non-Stock Collateral or the security interest therein and, unless Lender
requests otherwise, appear in and defend any such action or proceeding at
Borrower's expense, (iv) pay any reasonable expenses incurred by Borrower and,
except to the extent prohibited by applicable law, by Lender in the custody,
preservation, use or operation of the Non-Stock Collateral, and (v) pay and
discharge promptly all taxes, assessments and governmental charges or levies
imposed upon any Non-Stock Collateral.
(e) Maintenance of Insurance. Borrower will maintain, with financially sound and reputable companies acceptable to Lender, insurance policies (i) insuring its inventory and equipment against loss by fire, explosion, theft and such other casualties as are usually insured against by companies engaged in the same or similar businesses and (ii) insuring Borrower and Lender against liability for personal injury and property damage relating to such inventory and equipment, such policies to be in such amounts and against at least such risks as are usually insured against in the same general area by companies engaged in the same or similar businesses, naming Lender as an additional insured with a lender loss payable clause in favor of Lender. Borrower shall, if so requested by Lender, deliver to Lender as often as Lender may reasonably request, a report of a reputable insurance broker satisfactory to Lender with respect to the insurance on its inventory and equipment. All insurance with respect to the inventory and equipment shall (i) contain a clause which provides that Lender's interest under the policy will not be invalidated by any act or omission of, or any breach of warranty by, the insured, or by any change in the title, ownership or possession of the insured property, or by the use of the property for purposes more hazardous than is permitted in the policy, and (ii) provide that no cancellation, reduction in the amount or change in coverage thereof shall be effective until at least ten days after receipt by Lender of written notice thereof.
(f) Compliance with Warranties and Representations. Cause all warranties and representations made by Borrower in this Stock Pledge to remain true and promptly to notify Lender of any change in any fact or circumstances warranted or represented by Borrower in this Stock Pledge.
(g) Compliance with Laws, Etc. Borrower will comply, in all material respects, with all acts, rules, regulations, orders, decrees and directions of any governmental authority, applicable to the Collateral or any part thereof or to the operation of Borrower's business; provided, however, that Borrower may contest any act, regulation, order, decree or direction in any reasonable manner which shall not, in the sole opinion of Lender, adversely affect Lender's rights hereunder or adversely affect the priority of its lien on and security interest in the Collateral.
(h) Documentation. From time to time, if requested by Lender, execute and deliver to Lender, in form and substance acceptable to Lender, separate assignments, certificates, documents, financing statements, supplemental writings, and further instruments and take any and all further action as Lender may reasonably require in order to evidence, confirm, affirm, maintain, perfect or further assure the hypothecation to Lender of the Collateral or Lender's security interest therein, or to give any other person notice of Lender's interest in the Collateral; and Lender may deliver to or serve upon any other person or file in any appropriate public office any of the foregoing.
Section 6.
(a) Voting Rights. So long as no Default (defined below) occurs and remains continuing, and subject to the provisions of the Plan Documents and the security interest granted herein, Borrower shall be entitled to exercise any and all voting and other consensual rights pertaining to the Stock Collateral.
(b) Distributions. So long as no Default (defined below) occurs and remains continuing, and subject to the provisions of the Plan Documents and the security interest granted herein, Borrower shall be entitled to receive and to retain and use any and all dividends, distributions and other amounts paid in respect of the Stock Collateral; provided, however, that any and all such dividends, distributions and other amounts received in the form of stock, bonds, certificated securities, warrants, options or rights to acquire any of the foregoing, together with any certificates representing same, shall become Stock Collateral and forthwith shall be delivered to Lender, and shall further, if received by Borrower, be received in trust for the benefit of Lender, be segregated from the other property of Borrower and forthwith be delivered to Lender in the same form as received (with an assignment separate from certificate and any other necessary endorsements).
(c) Dealings in Stock Collateral. Lender shall have no responsibility for ascertaining any maturities, calls, conversions, exchanges, offers, tenders or similar matters relating to the Stock Collateral or for informing Borrower with respect to any of such matters (irrespective of whether Lender actually has, or may be deemed to have, knowledge thereof). Lender shall not be required to take any steps or actions with regard to the Stock Collateral as may be requested or authorized by Borrower unless (i) such steps are reasonable and will not adversely affect the value as collateral of the Stock Collateral, and (ii) such request or authorization by Borrower is made in writing and is actually received by Lender.
(d) Other Provisions. The terms of this Stock Pledge concerning affirmative covenants of Borrower, Default and related matters set forth additional provisions concerning the Stock Collateral.
Section 7.
(a) Default. For purposes of this Stock Pledge, the term "Default" means the existence or occurrence of any one or more of the events constituting an Event of Default under the Loan Agreement.
(b) Stock Collateral Voting Rights. With respect to any Stock Collateral, so long as a Default has occurred and is continuing:
(i) At the option of Lender, all rights of Borrower to exercise the voting and other consensual rights which Borrower would otherwise be entitled to exercise, and to receive the dividends and distributions which Borrower would otherwise be authorized to receive and retain, shall cease, and all such rights thereupon shall become vested in Lender which thereupon shall have the sole right to exercise such voting and other consensual rights and to receive and to hold as Collateral such dividends and distributions.
(ii) All dividends and other distributions which are received by Borrower contrary to the provisions of this Stock Pledge shall be received in trust for the benefit of Lender, shall be segregated from other funds of Borrower and forthwith shall be paid over to Lender as Collateral in the same form as so received (with an assignment separate from certificate and any other necessary endorsements).
(c) Remedies. Upon the occurrence of a Default, in addition to any and all other rights and remedies which it may then have hereunder, or at law or in equity, or under the Commercial Code, Lender at its option may: (i) declare the entire unpaid balance of principal of and all accrued interest on the Obligations immediately due and payable, without notice, demand, or presentment, which are hereby waived; (ii) reduce its claims to judgment, foreclose or otherwise enforce its security interest in all or any part of the Collateral by any available judicial procedure; (iii) after any notification required by this Stock Pledge, sell, or otherwise dispose of, at the office of Lender, or elsewhere as chosen by Lender, all or any part of the Collateral, and any such sale or other disposition may be as a unit or in parcels, by public or private proceedings, and by way of one or more contracts (it being agreed that the sale of all or any part of the Collateral shall not exhaust Lender's power of sale, but sales may be made from time to time until all of the Collateral has been sold or until the Obligations have been paid in full) and at any such sale it shall not be necessary to exhibit the Collateral; (iv) in its discretion, retain the Collateral in satisfaction of the Obligations whenever the circumstances are such that Lender is entitled to do so under the Commercial Code; (v) apply by appropriate judicial proceedings for appointment of a receiver for the Collateral, or any part thereof, and Borrower hereby consents to any such appointment; (vi) buy the Collateral at any public sale; and (vii) buy the Collateral at any private sale if the Collateral is of a type customarily sold in a recognized market or is of a type which is the subject of widely distributed standard price quotations. Lender shall be entitled to apply the proceeds of any sale or other disposition of the Collateral in the following order: first, to the payment of all its reasonable costs incurred in storing, preparing for sale, or selling all or any part of the Collateral and to the payment of attorneys' fees as provided for herein or in the Loan Agreement; and next, toward repayment of the Loan as provided in the Loan Agreement and Note. Lender shall account to Borrower for any surplus. If the proceeds are not sufficient to pay the Obligations in full, Borrower shall remain liable for any deficiency.
(d) Notice. Reasonable notification of time and place of any public sale of the Collateral or reasonable notification of the time after which any private sale or other intended disposition of the Collateral is to be made shall be sent to Borrower and to any other person entitled under the Commercial Code to notice; provided, that if the Collateral is perishable or threatens to decline speedily in value or is of a type customarily sold on a recognized market, Lender may sell or otherwise dispose of such Collateral without notification, advertisement, or other notice of any kind. It is agreed that notice sent or given not less than five calendar days prior to the taking of the action to which the notice relates is reasonable notification and notice.
(e) Stock Collateral. By virtue of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("1933 Act"), or any other laws or regulations, legal restrictions or limitations peculiar to securities may apply and affect Lender in any attempts to dispose of all or any portion of the Stock Collateral in the enforcement of Lender's rights and remedies hereunder. For these reasons, Lender is hereby authorized by Borrower, but is not obligated, in the event of any Default giving rise to Lender's rights to sell or otherwise dispose of any Stock Collateral, to sell all or any part of the Stock Collateral at private sale, subject to investment letter restrictions or in any other manner which will not require the Stock Collateral, or any part thereof, to be registered in accordance with the 1933 Act, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any other law or regulation ("Registration"), at the best price reasonably obtainable by Lender at any such private sale or other disposition in any manner mentioned above. Lender is hereby further authorized by Borrower, but is not obligated, in the event of any Default giving rise to Lender's rights to sell or otherwise dispose of Collateral, to sell all or any part of the Stock Collateral at a public sale at the best price obtainable by Lender at any such public sale. A commercially reasonable public sale of Stock Collateral shall be deemed to include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Lender shall publish a notice of the sale in a newspaper of general circulation in the county of the office of Lender or the county of the place of sale chosen by Lender if not at its office, and elsewhere as chosen by Lender; (ii) the notice of sale shall state that Lender reserves the right to bid for and purchase the Stock Collateral; (iii) all Stock Collateral of the same issuer shall be sold only as a block and shall not be sold jointly or broken down; (iv) the purchaser of the Stock Collateral shall provide an investment letter; (v) the certificate(s) for the shares of the Stock Collateral sold shall bear a legend to the effect that the shares are restricted and may not be sold or transferred without registration under the 1933 Act and under applicable state securities laws or under a valid exemption from the 1933 Act and from applicable state securities laws; and (vi) any other procedures or restrictions necessary to sell or dispose of the Stock Collateral or any part thereof, without Registration of the Stock Collateral or to comply with any other express requirements of the Commercial Code. Lender is also hereby authorized by Borrower, but is not obligated, to take such actions, give such notices, obtain such consents, and do such other things as Lender may deem required or appropriate in the event of a sale or disposition of any of the Stock Collateral. Borrower understands that Lender may in its discretion approach a restricted number of potential purchasers for a private sale and that a sale under such circumstances may yield a lower price for the Stock Collateral, or any part or parts thereof, than would otherwise be obtainable if the same were subject to an effective Registration and sold in the open market. Borrower also understands that a public sale of the Stock Collateral in any manner that will not require Registration may yield a lower price for the Stock Collateral than would otherwise be obtainable if the same were subject to an effective Registration and sold in the open market. Borrower agrees (i) that in the event Lender shall upon any Default sell the Stock Collateral, or any portion thereof, at such private sale or sales or at such public sale, or in connection with any sale that is pursuant to effective Registration, Lender shall have the right to rely upon the advice and opinion of any member firm of a national securities exchange as to the best price reasonably obtainable upon such private sale or public sale thereof, and (ii) that such reliance shall be conclusive evidence that Lender handled such matter in a commercially reasonable manner under the Commercial Code.
(f) No Waivers by Lender. The acceptance by Lender at any time and from time to time of partial payment of the aggregate amount due under the Note upon conversion of all or any portion of the Principal into Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any Default then existing. No waiver by Lender of any Default shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent Default, nor shall any such waiver by Lender be deemed to be a continuing waiver. No delay or omission by Lender in exercising any right or power hereunder, or under any other writings executed by Borrower as security for or in connection with the Obligations, shall impair any such right or power or be construed as a waiver thereof or an acquiescence therein, nor shall any single or particular exercise of any such right or power preclude other or further exercise thereof, or the exercise of any other right or power of Lender hereunder or under such other writings.
(g) Remedies Cumulative. All rights and remedies of Lender
under this Stock Pledge are cumulative of each other and every other right or
remedy which Lender may otherwise have at law or in equity or under any other
writing for the enforcement of the security interest herein or the collection of
the Obligations, and the exercise or failure to exercise of one or more rights
or remedies shall not prejudice or impair the concurrent or subsequent exercise
of other rights or remedies. Should any person other than Borrower have
heretofore executed or hereafter execute in favor of Lender any deed of trust,
mortgage, or security agreement to secure the payment of the Obligations or any
part thereof or should Borrower have heretofore executed or hereafter execute in
favor of Lender any deed of trust, any mortgage or any other security agreement:
(i) the lien or security interest therein created and all rights, powers,
privileges and remedies vested in Lender by the terms hereof shall exist
concurrently with the security interest herein created and all rights, powers,
privileges, and remedies vested in Lender by the terms hereof, and (ii) the
exercise or failure to exercise by Lender of any right or power conferred upon
it in any such instrument shall not prejudice or impair Lender's rights, titles,
liens and powers existing hereunder.
Section 8.
(a) Filings. Lender shall have the right at any time to execute and file the original or a copy of this Stock Pledge as a financing statement, but the failure of Lender to do so shall not impair the validity or enforceability of this Stock Pledge.
(b) Actions With Respect to Collateral. Concerning the indebtedness to Lender comprising the Obligations, Lender, in its sole discretion without in any manner impairing Lender's rights and powers hereunder, may, at any time and from time to time, without further consent of or notice to Borrower, and with or without valuable consideration, (i) make loans or advances to Borrower, or otherwise incur or acquire obligations of Borrower; (ii) renew or extend the maturity of or accept partial payments upon the Obligations or any part thereof; (iii) release any person primarily or secondarily liable in respect thereof; (iv) alter in any manner that Lender may elect the terms of any instrument evidencing the Obligations or any part thereof either as to the maturity thereof, rate of interest, method of payment, parties thereto or otherwise; (v) renew, extend, or accept partial payments upon, release or permit substitutions for or withdrawals of, any security at any time directly or indirectly, immediately or remotely, securing the payment of the Obligations or any part thereof; and (vi) release or pay to any person otherwise entitled thereto, any amount paid or payable in respect of any such other direct or indirect security for the Obligations, or any part thereof.
(c) Limits on Obligations of Lender. Lender shall never be liable for its failure to use due diligence in the satisfaction of the Obligations, or any part thereof, or for its failure to give notice to Borrower of a Default or of a default in the payment of or upon any Collateral, whether pledged hereunder or otherwise. Lender shall have no duty to fix or preserve rights against prior parties to the Collateral, and shall never be liable for its failure to use diligence to collect any amount payable in respect of the Collateral, but shall be liable only to account to Borrower for what it may actually collect or receive thereon. Without limiting the generality of the immediately preceding sentence, Lender shall not be, required to take any steps or actions with regard to Collateral as may be requested or authorized by Borrower unless (i) Lender shall determine, in its sole discretion, that such steps or actions will not adversely affect the value of the Collateral as collateral, and (ii) such request or authorization by Borrower is made in writing and is actually received by Lender.
(d) Assignment. The rights, powers, and interest held by Lender under this Stock Pledge and the Loan Agreement and Note, together with all interest in and to the Collateral, may be transferred and assigned by Lender, in whole or in part, at such time and upon such terms as it may deem advisable. Borrower shall not be permitted to transfer or assign its rights or obligations under this Stock Pledge, or the other Plan Documents.
(e) Limitation on Interest. No provision herein or in the Loan Agreement or Note, any of the other Plan Documents, or any other promissory note, agreement or document executed by Borrower evidencing the Obligations, shall require the payment or permit the collection of interest in excess of the maximum permitted by law. If any excess of interest in such respect is provided for herein or in the Note or the Loan Agreement, or in any of the Plan Documents or other promissory note, agreement or document, the provisions of this Paragraph shall govern, and Borrower shall not be obligated to pay the amount of such interest to the extent that it is in excess of the amount permitted by law. The intention of the parties being to conform strictly to the usury laws now in force, all of the Plan Documents and all promissory notes, agreements or documents executed by Borrower evidencing the Obligations shall be held subject to reduction to the amount allowed under said usury laws as now or hereafter construed by the courts having jurisdiction.
Section 9.
(a) Binding Effect. This Stock Pledge shall be binding on Borrower and Borrower's legal representatives, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Lender, its legal representatives, successors and assigns.
(b) Term. Until the Obligations shall have been paid and performed in full, all rights granted to Lender under this Stock Pledge shall continue to exist and may be exercised at any time irrespective of the fact that any of the Obligations or rights hereunder may have become barred by any statute of limitations, the benefits of which are hereby expressly waived by Borrower. Conversion of all or a portion of the Principal into Common Stock pursuant to the Loan Agreement shall not release Borrower from the terms of this Stock Pledge unless and until all Obligations are irrevocably satisfied in full.
(c) Governing Law. This Stock Pledge shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Utah, excluding conflict of law provisions.
(d) Counterparts. This Stock Pledge may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(e) Severability. If any provision of this Stock Pledge is found by any court or arbitral tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the other provisions of this Stock Pledge and all provisions not affected by the invalidity shall remain in full force and effect.
(f) Number and Gender; Headings. Each number and gender shall be deemed to include each other number and gender, as the context may require. The headings and captions contained in this Stock Pledge shall not constitute a part thereof and shall not be used in its construction or interpretation.
(g) Submission to Jurisdiction; Service of Process. Borrower and Lender agree to the following: (i) Any legal action or proceeding with respect to this Stock Pledge or any document related thereto may be brought in the courts of the State of Utah or of the United States of America for the District of Utah, and, by execution and delivery of this Stock Pledge, Borrower hereby accepts for itself and in respect of its property, generally and unconditionally, the jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts. Borrower hereby irrevocably waives any objection, including, without limitation, any objection to the laying of venue or based on the grounds of forum non conveniens, which Borrower may now or hereafter have to the bringing of any such action or proceeding in such respective jurisdictions. (ii) Borrower irrevocably consents to the service of process of any of the aforesaid courts in any such action or proceeding by the mailing of copies thereof by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to Borrower at its address provided herein. (iii) Nothing contained in this Section shall affect the right of Lender to serve process in any other manner permitted by law or commence legal proceedings or otherwise proceed against Borrower in any other jurisdiction.
(h) Amendment and Modification. This Stock Pledge may be amended or modified only by a writing executed by each party.
BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THIS SECURITY
AGREEMENT AND STOCK PLEDGE EXECUTED BY BORROWER ON THE DATE FIRST ABOVE STATED.
BORROWER:
HOMEFED CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation
529 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
By: /s/ Patricia A. Wood --------------------------- Patricia A. Wood, President --------------------------- [Print Name and Title] |
LENDER:
LEUCADIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
a Utah corporation
529 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
By: /s/ Joseph A. Orlando --------------------------- Joseph A. Orlando, V.P. --------------------------- [Print Name and Title] |
EXHIBIT "A"
FINANCING STATEMENTS
The financing statements described in Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference.
All encumbrances of record listed on title insurance policies issued to Lender as of the date hereof covering real property that shall as of the date hereof be encumbered by the Deeds of Trust, are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Exhibit 10.21
TAX ALLOCATION AGREEMENT
This agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of November 1, 2002, by and among HomeFed Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("HomeFed"), CDS Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("CDS Holding"), CDS Devco, Inc., a California corporation ("CDS Devco"), San Elijo Ranch, Inc., a California corporation ("SERI"), HomeFed Communities, Inc., a California corporation ("HFC Communities"), and HomeFed Resources Corporation, a California corporation ("HFC Resources" and, collectively, aside from HomeFed, the "Subsidiaries," with each of the Subsidiaries being a "Subsidiary").
WHEREAS, HomeFed is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations (the "HomeFed Group") filing a consolidated federal income tax return;
WHEREAS, CDS Holding, CDS Devco, and SERI have been part of the HomeFed Group since October 22, 2002 and HFC Communities and HFC Resources have been part of the HomeFed Group since ________________; and
WHEREAS, HomeFed and the Subsidiaries wish to provide for the allocation among them of the consolidated Federal income tax liability and state or local income tax liabilities of the HomeFed Group and for certain related matters.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
a. Except as otherwise provided herein, terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in, and shall be interpreted in accordance with, the Code, and the regulations and rulings issued thereunder, as in effect from time to time.
b. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms set forth below shall be defined as follows:
(1) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof.
(2) "Consolidated Return" means a consolidated Federal income tax return and any returns of estimated Federal income tax filed by the HomeFed Group which includes any of the Subsidiaries.
(3) "Consolidated Return Year" means Parent's taxable year (or portion thereof) beginning on a day after October 21, 2002, for which Parent files a Consolidated Return.
(4) "HomeFed Group" shall have the meaning ascribed in the recitals to this Agreement.
(5) "HomeFed Group Tax" means with respect to any given Consolidated Return Year, the consolidated Federal income tax liability of the HomeFed Group that is reported on, and paid in respect of, any consolidated Federal income tax return and any returns of estimated Federal income tax required to be filed for such taxable year.
(6) "Parent" means HomeFed or any successor common parent corporation of the HomeFed Group.
(7) "Revised Tax Liability" means, for any Consolidated Return Year in
which HomeFed Group Tax and/or a Subsidiary Tax (as the context may require) is
revised (including, without limitation, by reason of (i) a "determination"
within the meaning of Code Section 1313(a), (ii) HomeFed Group's filing of an
amended federal income tax return, or (iii) an assessment of tax in accordance
with Section 6213), the amount of any payment (i) required from a Subsidiary to
Parent under Section 2(b), and (ii) required from Parent to a Subsidiary under
Section 3, shall be recomputed by substituting the revised HomeFed Group Tax
and/or the revised Subsidiary Tax.
(8) "Separate Company Tax Return" means the hypothetical Federal income tax return and any hypothetical returns of estimated Federal income tax a Subsidiary would have been required to file in any given Consolidated Return Year on which it would have reported its Subsidiary Tax.
(9) "Subsidiary Estimated Tax" means, in respect of a given Subsidiary, for any given Consolidated Return Year, the Subsidiary Tax determined through the end of each period for which estimated Federal income tax payments on a consolidated basis are due (whether or not any amounts are actually owing by Parent), which liability shall be calculated in accordance with Section 6655 of the Code.
(10) "Subsidiary Tax" means, for each Subsidiary, its Tax liability for the Consolidated Return Year, including the Subsidiary's Federal income tax liability, computed hypothetically on a separate company basis (without regard to the income, deductions and credits of any other member of the HomeFed Group) for all relevant taxable years determined (x) using the same elections and methods of accounting as are used with respect to the Subsidiary in determining HomeFed Group Tax; (y) giving effect to the modifications specified in Reg. Sec. 1.1552-1(a)(2)(ii); and (z) without regard to any amount attributable to a credit arising under Code Section 53.
(11) "Subsidiary-Generated Benefit" means, for each Subsidiary, the amount,
if any, by which the Subsidiary's loss or credit or loss or credit carryover
results in either (i) a reduction of HomeFed Group Tax for any given
Consolidated Return Year or (ii) a refund obtained by Parent with respect to any
given Consolidated Return Year; provided, however, that the Subsidiary-Generated
Benefit for a taxable year shall not exceed the excess of (i) the consolidated
Federal income tax of the HomeFed Group for such taxable year computed
hypothetically by giving effect only to the loss or credit, or loss or credit
carryovers of all members of the HomeFed Group other than the Subsidiary over
(ii) the HomeFed Group Tax for such taxable year.
(12) "Tax" means the regular Federal income tax, estimated Federal income tax or alternative minimum tax, as well as any other Federal tax not based on income, together with any and all interest, additions to tax, fines and penalties payable with respect thereto.
a. By Parent
In each Consolidated Return Year, Parent shall pay, in full, the HomeFed Group Tax, if any, that is reported on any Consolidated Return filed for such taxable year.
b. By the Subsidiaries
(1) In each Consolidated Return Year, each Subsidiary shall pay to Parent its Subsidiary Tax and its Subsidiary Estimated Tax for such taxable year. All payments by a Subsidiary of its Subsidiary Estimated Tax made with respect to such Consolidated Return Year shall reduce (but not below zero) its Subsidiary Tax paid for such taxable year. Parent shall reimburse each Subsidiary in accordance with Section 4 to the extent its aggregate Subsidiary Estimated Tax payments for any given Consolidated Return Year exceed its Subsidiary Tax for such taxable year.
(2) The amount required to be paid in Section 2(b)(1) above shall be paid
in any given Consolidated Return Year no later than five (5) days prior to the
date on which any Consolidated Return is required to be filed for such taxable
year (taking account of any extensions thereof), or, with respect to any
interest and/or penalty not paid with the Consolidated Return and not covered by
Section 5(c), no later than five (5) days prior to the date on which Parent is
required to make payment thereof.
(3) Each Subsidiary shall, to Parent's satisfaction, consult and furnish Parent with all documentation Parent shall deem necessary to determine, in respect of any given Consolidated Return Year, the Subsidiary Tax and Subsidiary Estimated Tax for such taxable year no later than either seventy-five (75) days prior to the date on which the consolidated income is required to be filed or, as the context may require, no later than ten (10) days prior to the date on which the estimated Federal income tax return is required to be filed in such taxable year (in each case taking account of any extensions thereof). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no case shall the documentation described in this Section 3(b)(3) necessary to determine the Subsidiary Tax, be required prior to forty-five (45) days after the end of the Consolidated Return Year. No later than ten (10) days prior to the date on which the consolidated Federal income tax return is required to be filed or, as the context may require, no later than five (5) days prior to the date the Parent is to make an estimated federal income tax payment, Parent shall provide each Subsidiary a reasonably detailed calculation of its Subsidiary Tax and its Subsidiary Estimated Tax (as the context may require).
a. Benefit Carried Back To A Prior Year. If a Subsidiary-Generated Benefit arises in any Consolidated Return Year, and the Subsidiary, had it been filing separate from the HomeFed Group for all relevant periods could have carried back to a prior Consolidated Return Year all or part of the loss, deduction or credit (not otherwise compensated in accordance with Section 3) that gave rise to such Subsidiary-Generated Benefit, the portion of such Subsidiary-Generated Benefit attributable to such loss, deduction or credit (or portion thereof) shall be applied to reduce (but not below zero) the Subsidiary Tax paid under Section 2 in respect of such prior Consolidated Return Year, and Parent shall pay to the Subsidiary the amount of such reduction in accordance with Section 4(b); provided, however, that the Subsidiary shall not be entitled to all or a portion of such payment to the extent the Subsidiary Tax for such prior taxable year had previously been reduced under this Section 3. In the event that the losses and credits of the Subsidiaries in any given Consolidated Return Year exceed the total losses and credits which result in a Subsidiary-Generated Benefit with respect to such Consolidated Return Year, the amount payable to the Subsidiaries under this Section 3(a) shall be allocated among the Subsidiaries in proportion to the losses of each Subsidiary and if the Subsidiary Benefit in such Consolidated Return Year exceeds that attributable to such losses any excess shall be allocated among the Subsidiaries in proportion to the credits of each Subsidiary with respect to such Consolidated Return Year.
b. Benefit Remaining Upon Departure From The HomeFed Group. If, at some future
date, a Subsidiary ceases to be a member of the HomeFed Group but continues to
be a corporation subject to Federal income tax, Parent shall pay to the
Subsidiary at the time and to the extent provided by Section 4(b) below, (1) the
aggregate amount of its Subsidiary-Generated Benefit for all Consolidated Return
Years ending on or prior to such cessation date (the amount of the
Subsidiary-Generated Benefit for the Consolidated Return Year ending on the
cessation date shall be determined on the basis of an interim closing of the
books) less the portion of the Subsidiary-Generated Benefit (x) applied to
reduce amounts payable by the Subsidiary as provided for in this Section 3, (y)
not described in (x) and allocable to any loss, deduction or credit the
carryforward period for which would have expired at or prior to such time as
such loss, deduction or credit carryover would have reduced the Subsidiary's
Federal income tax in a subsequent taxable year had it filed a federal income
tax return separate from the HomeFed Group during all relevant taxable years, or
(2) attributable to any loss, deduction or credit carryover which is allocable
to the Subsidiary or its successor under Reg. Sec. 1.1502-79.
a. Of Tax Payments
(1) To the extent any amount (or part thereof) described in and required to be paid by Parent under Section 2(b)(1) represents all or a part of a tax refund to be received by the HomeFed Group, such payment shall be made no later than five (5) days after the receipt of such refund; to the extent any amount (or part thereof) described in and required to be paid by Parent under Section 2(b)(1) represents all or part of a credit against the HomeFed Group Tax for a succeeding Consolidated Return Year, such payment shall be made no later than five (5) days after such tax payment against which such amount is credited is to be paid by Parent.
(2) To the extent Section 4(a)(1) does not apply with respect to any amount
(or portion thereof) described in and required to be paid by Parent under
Section 2(b)(1) for any given Consolidated Return Year, such payment shall be
made no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which the Consolidated
Return is required to be filed for such Consolidated Return Year (taking account
of any extensions thereof).
(3) No later than fifteen (15) days prior to the date Parent is required to make a payment described in Section 2(b)(1) for any given Consolidated Return Year, a Subsidiary shall consult and furnish Parent with any and all documents Parent shall deem necessary in determining the Subsidiary's entitlement to and the amount of such payment.
b. Of A Subsidiary-Generated Benefit
(1) For any given Consolidated Return Year, any amount required to be paid under Section 3(a) shall be paid no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which the Consolidated Return is required to be filed for such taxable year (taking into account any extensions thereof).
(2) Any payment required to be made under Section 3(b) shall be made to the extent that the loss, deduction or credit carryover giving rise to the Subsidiary-Generated Benefit (and not previously applied under Section 3 to reduce the Subsidiary Tax for any Consolidated Return Year) would have reduced the Subsidiary's Federal income tax liability in a subsequent taxable year and shall be made no later than fifteen (15) days after the Subsidiary provides notice to Parent and also furnishes to Parent, to Parent's satisfaction, with any and all documents Parent shall deem necessary in determining entitlement and amount of such payment, including but not limited to, any Federal income tax returns for all such relevant taxable years.
(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no double benefit to either the HomeFed Group or a Subsidiary by reason of the utilization of deductions, losses, credits, carryovers, carrybacks, etc. and payments made hereunder. To the extent appropriate, such items and payments hereunder shall be adjusted equitably.
a. For any given Consolidated Return Year, each Subsidiary shall pay to Parent, and Parent shall refund to each Subsidiary, an amount equal to the excess of a Revised Tax Liability over the amounts previously paid for such taxable year by the relevant party (as the context may require). The parties recognize that the Revised Tax Liability for any taxable year is not necessarily the Parent's or a Subsidiary's final tax liability for that taxable year, and may be recomputed in accordance with this Section 5(a) more than once.
b. A payment or refund required under Section 5(a) above shall be made (as the context may require) no later than (i) five (5) days prior to the date on which Parent is required to make an additional payment of tax with respect to a Revised Tax Liability, (ii) five (5) days after the receipt of a refund attributable to a Revised Tax Liability or (iii) five (5) days after the event giving rise to a Revised Tax Liability if such event does not result in the payment of additional tax or the receipt of a refund.
c. A payment or refund required under Section 5(a) above shall include a portion of any interest and/or penalty paid or credited by the Internal Revenue Service that is allocated to a Subsidiary in proportion with its respective adjustments. The amounts payable to or by the Subsidiary pursuant to this Section 5(c) shall be paid at the same time the amounts payable pursuant to Section 5(a) are paid.
d. Other than as provided in Section 5(c), a payment or refund required under
Section 5(a) above shall not bear interest.
Any corporation acquired by a Subsidiary shall become a party to this Agreement at the time such corporation is entitled or required to become a member of the HomeFed Group and the parties hereto that acquired such new member shall cause such new member to deliver to Parent a written instrument to such effect. The parties hereto hereby agree to the inclusion of any such acquired corporation as a party to this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended, as may be necessary or appropriate, to take into account any special circumstances arising from the inclusion of such acquired corporation in the HomeFed Group.
a. Parent shall prepare and file all Tax returns, and any other returns, documents or statements required to be filed with respect to or on which is reflected the determination of the Tax liability of the HomeFed Group for all taxable years of the HomeFed Group (including taxable years ending prior to or including the date hereof).
b. In its sole discretion, Parent shall have the right to make all decisions and
elections with respect to all Tax returns described in Section 7(a) above and
with respect to all matters relating to the Tax liability of the HomeFed Group
and Subsidiaries (with respect to any taxable year in which a Subsidiary was a
member of the HomeFed Group), for all taxable years of the HomeFed Group thereof
(including taxable years ending prior to or including the date hereof)
including, without limitation,
(1) the right to determine (i) the manner in which such returns, documents or statements shall be prepared and filed, including, without limitation, the manner in which any item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit shall be reported, (ii) whether any amended returns shall be filed, (iii) whether any filing extensions may be requested and (iv) the elections that will be made by any member,
(2) the right to contest, compromise or settle any adjustment or deficiency proposed, asserted or assessed as a result of any audit of such returns,
(3) the right to control any filing, prosecution, contest, compromise or settlement of any claim for refund, including the right to determine whether any refunds, to which the HomeFed Group may be entitled, shall be paid by way of refund or credited against the Tax liability for the Affiliated Group.
Such determination shall be binding and conclusive upon the parties for purposes hereof.
c. Each Subsidiary hereby irrevocably appoints Parent as its agent and attorney-in-fact to take such action (including the execution of documents) as Parent may deem appropriate to effect the foregoing.
d. All expenses incurred by Parent resulting from actions described under this
Section 7, to the extent that such actions relate to a Subsidiary, shall be
shared equally by Parent and the Subsidiary.
a. In the event that any Subsidiary ceases to be included in the HomeFed Group, the Subsidiary and Parent shall furnish each other with information required to prepare accurately (i) the consolidated Federal income tax return of the HomeFed Group for the last taxable year in which the Subsidiary had been included in the HomeFed Group, (ii) the Federal income tax returns for all taxable years thereafter of the Subsidiary (and its predecessors and successors) and Parent, respectively, in which the Tax liability of either may be affected by their former affiliation (including, for example, the apportionment of any consolidated loss or credit carryover to the Subsidiary) and (iii) any Consolidated Return, including information necessary to determine any Tax liability payable with respect to such return, to the extent such determination is based upon the operations of the Subsidiary.
b. In the case of a termination of affiliation described in Section 8(a), the Subsidiary shall furnish Parent with all information and assistance as may be requested that relates to a Consolidated Return Year, including but not limited to (i) information and assistance required to apply for and obtain the benefit of any carryback to a Consolidated Return Year of the loss, deduction or credit of the Subsidiary, provided, however, that this provision shall not be construed to prevent the Subsidiary from validly electing not to carryback such loss, deduction or credit and (ii) information and assistance concerning the status of any Tax audit or refund claim relating to a Consolidated Return Year; provided, that expenses incurred with respect to any such Tax audit or refund claim shall be shared in a manner Parent shall deem equitable.
c. Payments under this Section 8 shall be made in accordance with principles analogous to those set forth under Sections 2, 3, or 5 hereof and at the time(s) set forth therein, as if the Subsidiary had still been a member of the HomeFed Group.
d. Each Subsidiary acknowledges Parent's right to make an election under Reg. Sec. 1.1502-20(g) with respect to the Subsidiary and shall satisfy all procedural requirements prescribed by Reg. Sec. 1.1502-20(g) in connection with such election. Parent and the Subsidiaries agree that Parent shall not be required to compensate if such election is made.
e. A Subsidiary shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent, file an application for a carryback adjustment of the Subsidiary Tax with respect to any given Consolidated Return Year. In the event any such application is filed after obtaining prior consent, the Subsidiary shall be entitled to that portion of the actual refund that is attributable to the Subsidiary determined in accordance with Section 5 hereof; provided, that the Subsidiary shall not be entitled to any portion of such refund to the extent the items giving rise to such carryback had previously reduced its Subsidiary Tax or gave rise to a payment to the Subsidiary under Sections 3, 4 or 5 hereof.
All disputes arising under this Agreement shall be decided by the public accountants regularly employed by Parent at the time the Consolidated Return is filed for such taxable year. Such determination shall be binding and conclusive upon the parties for the purposes hereof. Expenses incurred with respect to any such determination shall be shared in a manner Parent deems equitable.
As between Parent and each Subsidiary, the provisions of this Agreement shall fix the liability of each to the other as to the matters covered hereunder, even if such provisions are not controlling for Tax or other purposes (including, but not limited to, the computation of earnings and profits for Federal tax purposes), and even if Parent and other corporations which now are, or which from time to time may become, members of the HomeFed Group enter into other arrangements for the allocation of the portion of the total Tax liability of the HomeFed Group which is allocable to them.
Each Subsidiary shall, jointly and severally, indemnify, defend and hold harmless from and against any and all liabilities Parent and each other member of the HomeFed Group for the amount of any Subsidiary Tax. CDS Holding, CDS Devco and SERI shall, jointly and severally, indemnify, defend and hold harmless Parent and each other member of the HomeFed Group from and against any and all liabilities for all Taxes for which each may become liable under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 solely by reason of being a member of a consolidated group prior to joining the HomeFed Group. HomeFed, HFC Communities and HFC Resources shall, jointly and severally, indemnify, defend and hold harmless CDS Holding, CDS Devco and SERI from and against any and all liabilities for all Taxes of the HomeFed Group that relate to taxable periods (or portions thereof) that ended on or before October 21, 2002.
In the event Parent files consolidated, combined or unitary tax returns or reports in any state or local jurisdiction on behalf of, and pays such taxes owed, in all or in part, by the HomeFed Group, principles and procedures analogous to the principles and procedures (including the indemnity provision in Section 11) stated herein shall apply to determine the parties' respective liability in respect thereof and the payments to be made.
Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, its provisions shall remain in effect with respect to any period of time during the tax year in which termination occurs for which income of a Subsidiary must be included in the consolidated return.
a. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each party shall bear any and all expenses that arise from their respective obligations under this Agreement.
b. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein. No alteration, amendment or modification of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made by an instrument signed in writing by an authorized officer of each party.
c. This Agreement has been made in and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware from time to time obtaining, without regard to conflict of laws principles.
d. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each party and all successors hereto and shall not be assignable by any party without the prior written consent of all parties.
e. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand or mailed, certified or registered mail, with postage prepaid addressed to the party to which the notice or other communication is given at its address as set forth below, or at such other address of which a party sends written notice to the other party hereto pursuant to this Section 14, to the attention of the President of such other party.
f. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
g. The headings of the Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.
HOMEFED CORPORATION
By: /s/ Erin N. Ruhe --------------------------- Name: Erin N. Ruhe Title: Vice President |
HOMEFED COMMUNITIES, INC.
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden --------------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
HOMEFED RESOURCES CORPORATION
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden --------------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
CDS HOLDING CORPORATION
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden -------------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: Chairman |
CDS DEVCO, INC.
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden -------------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
SAN ELIJO RANCH, INC.
By: /s/ Paul J. Borden --------------------------- Name: Paul J. Borden Title: President |
Exhibit 10.22
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AND OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS,
THE SAN MARCOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND
SAN ELIJO HILLS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, THE SAN MARCOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND SAN ELIJO HILLS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
This Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Development Agreement and Owner Participation Agreement ("Amendment") is entered into by and between the City of San Marcos, a municipal corporation ("City"), the San Marcos Redevelopment Agency ("Agency"), and San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Owner"), with regard to the development of real property in the City of San Marcos.
RECITALS
A. On August 15, 1997, the parties hereto or their predecessors-in-interest caused to be recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder as document no. 1997-0395018 that certain First Amended and Restated Development Agreement and Owner Participation Agreement between the City of San Marcos, the San Marcos Redevelopment Agency, and San Elijo Ranch, Inc. ("Development Agreement") concerning the real estate development commonly known as San Elijo Hills located in the City of San Marcos, California, more particularly described therein (the "Project");
B. Section 4.4 of the Development Agreement authorizes its amendment in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65868;
C. This Amendment is necessary and desirable to insure the financing and installation of public infrastructure consistent with the Circulation Element of the San Marcos General Plan.
D. The terms and conditions of this Amendment have undergone extensive review by the City and its City Council, and have been found to be fair, just, reasonable and will advance the health, safety and welfare of San Marcos residents;
E. This Amendment is consistent with the San Marcos General Plan and San Elijo Hills Specific Plan;
F. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied in connection with this Amendment; and
G. All actions taken and approvals given by the City have been in accordance with applicable legal requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, and other procedural matters.
H. It is the intention of the parties that this Amendment shall be binding upon those portions of the Project identified in the Specific Plan as Project Planning Areas C2 (Subareas a, b and c), F2, I1, I2, J, K1, K2, O, S, T, V1, and V2. No other portions of the Project are affected or bound hereby.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Purpose and Effect. The purpose and effect of this Amendment shall be to modify and supplement the provisions of the Development Agreement. Except as modified or supplemented herein, the provisions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any inconsistency, the terms and conditions of this Amendment will prevail. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Development Agreement.
2. San Elijo Road Improvements. The provisions below are hereby inserted following subparagraph "m" of Section A.1 at page 5 of Exhibit "B," entitled "Schedule of Performance":
n. Upon the earlier of thirty (30) days from the effective date of the Amendment, or the issuance of a residential building permit for the 1,350th equivalent single family dwelling unit, excluding therefrom building permits issued for Area R, construction offices, model homes or affordable units as described in the first full paragraph of page 1 of this Exhibit "B" (hereafter "Equivalent Building Permit"), Owner will submit to CDFG and USF&WS (as defined in Section 5.11 of the Development Amendment and hereafter referred to as "Resource Agencies"), and any other governmental agency with lawful jurisdiction (collectively "Regulatory Agencies"), applications necessary for the improvement of that portion of San Elijo Road (formerly known as Questhaven Road) westerly of the Project's western boundary and easterly the eastern boundary of the University Commons Specific Plan (hereafter, the "San Elijo Road Dip") necessary to construct the segment to the standards identified in City Resolution 99-5317, adopted October 26, 1999 (hereafter, the "Mitigation Monitoring Program").
o. Upon the earlier of December 1, 2003, or the issuance of the 2,000th Equivalent Building Permit, Owner will submit to the Resource Agencies all applications necessary for the improvement of that portion of San Elijo Road easterly of the Project's eastern boundary and westerly of the existing terminus of Twin Oaks Valley Road (hereafter, "San Elijo Road East"), necessary to construct the segment to the standards identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
p. Owner will submit to the City an application to amend CFD 99-01 as needed to generate the San Elijo Road CFD Funds, defined in Exhibit "C", Section 11 hereof, upon the earlier of January 31, 2004, or the issuance of the 2000th Equivalent Building Permit (the "CFD Amendment"). The CFD Amendment will not propose to exceed an aggregate 1.75% maximum tax rate for the projected home sales prices. In the event the City and/or Agency do not timely approve the CFD Amendment in the form submitted by Owner, Owner shall have no obligation to provide Owner's Advance or Owner's Contribution pursuant to Sections 11.2 and 11.3 of Exhibit "C".
q. Upon the earlier of March 30, 2004, or the issuance of the 2000th Equivalent Building Permit, Owner will submit to the City a complete design for the San Elijo Road Dip and San Elijo Road East in a form substantially consistent with existing draft plans exchanged by the City and Owner. The City will determine whether the submittal is complete pursuant to existing plan check application procedures. Owner will promptly respond to the City's reasonable requests for additional information necessary to insure a complete design submittal. City plan check and inspection fees are inapplicable to the subject improvements and will not be imposed.
r. Owner will construct the San Elijo Road Dip improvements upon the earlier of July 30, 2004, or the issuance of the 2,000th Equivalent Building Permit. Owner's obligation to commence physical construction is conditioned upon the City's acquisition of all required rights of way, the issuance of all necessary Regulatory Agency permits and approvals, including without limitation those required from the Resource Agencies, and the City/Agency approval of the CFD Amendment.
s. Possession of rights-of-way necessary for the construction of San Elijo Road East will be acquired by the City, using its powers of eminent domain if necessary, at no expense to Owner, upon the earlier of September 30, 2004, or the issuance of the 2,100th Equivalent Building Permit. Owner will cause plats and legal descriptions to be prepared, the cost of which shall be reimbursed as a component of Owner's Advance, defined at Section 11.3 of Exhibit "C" hereof.
t. Owner will commence construction of San Elijo Road East not later than January 31, 2005, provided that the City has acquired all necessary rights of way, and all necessary permits and approvals, including without limitation (i) permits and approvals necessary for the grading of all of Phase 3 of the Project, and (ii) the CFD Amendment, have been issued by all governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the improvements, including without limitation the City, Agency and Resource Agencies. Following commencement of construction Owner thereafter will diligently pursue construction to completion in accordance with the Development Agreement. Owner's obligation to continue construction once commenced is conditioned upon the availability of the City/Agency Contribution, as defined in Section 11.1 of Exhibit "C," sufficient to complete the improvements.
3. Satisfaction of Fair Share Funding Requirement. The parties agree that this Amendment constitutes satisfaction of the "Fair Share Funding Mechanism" requirement contained in Section A.1.h at page 4 of Exhibit "B" of the Development Agreement.
4. Tolling Extension. The following provision is added as Section A.3 at page 6 of Exhibit "B":
3. Tolling Extension. Owner's obligations, the building permit
thresholds and target dates set forth in Section A.1, Subparagraphs "n"
through "t" of this Exhibit "B" are deemed extended and excused in the
event Owner is unable to satisfy its obligations thereunder due to
circumstances beyond the reasonable control of Owner ("Tolling
Extension"). The Tolling Extension will be limited to the time period
during which the obligation(s) at issue may not reasonably be
satisfied. For example, the inability to timely obtain Regulatory
Agency or other governmental permits and approvals necessary to grade
all of Phase 3 of the Project or to construct the San Elijo Road Dip or
San Elijo Road East will activate the Tolling Extension. During the
Tolling Extension Owner may continue to develop the Project and obtain
building permits uninterrupted provided, however, that under no
circumstances may Owner exceed the building permit thresholds contained
in the Development Agreement and related Project entitlements, and
further provided that Owner continues to diligently pursue the
satisfaction of the item(s) delayed during the Tolling Extension. The
parties acknowledge that pursuant to the Development Agreement Owner
had no affirmative duty to perform the obligations contained in Section
A.1, Subparagraphs "n" through "t" on the terms and conditions
established in this Amendment.
5. San Elijo Road Financing. The provisions below are hereby inserted following Section 10 at page 11 of Exhibit "C," entitled "Questhaven/Twin Oaks Valley Corridor Public Facilities Financing Plan":
11. SAN ELIJO ROAD DIP/SAN ELIJO ROAD EAST FINANCING.
In satisfaction of the "fair share funding mechanism" requirement contained in Section A.1.h at page 4 of Exhibit "B" of the Development Agreement, the parties have agreed upon the financing of San Elijo Road improvements, including the San Elijo Road Dip and San Elijo Road East (collectively, "San Elijo Road Improvements") as follows:
11.1 City/Agency Contribution. The City and Agency will fund the Actual Costs, as defined in Exhibit "D", Section 4.3 of the Development Agreement, of the San Elijo Road Improvements ("City/Agency Contribution"), less Owner's Contribution, defined below, in a timely manner so as not to impede or delay development of the Project.
11.2 Owner's Contribution. Owner will contribute an amount not to exceed eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) towards the costs of the San Elijo Road Improvements ("Owner's Contribution"), consisting of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) allocated to physical construction costs, and one million dollars ($1,000,000) allocated to Owner's Advance, defined in Section 11.3, below. Owner's Contribution will be funded through CFD No. 99-01 proceeds ("San Elijo Road CFD Funds") generated from those portions of the Project undeveloped as of the effective date of this Amendment, including Project Planning Areas C2 (Subareas a, b and c), F2, I1, I2, J, K1, K2, O, S, T, V1, and V2. To the extent Owner's Advance is less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) for any reason, Owner's Contribution allocated to physical construction funding may exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000). In no event will Owner's Advance and CFD 99-01 proceeds allocated to physical construction funding collectively exceed eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). Regardless of the Actual Costs of the San Elijo Road Improvements and the amount of the City/Agency Contribution required to ensure completion of the San Elijo Road Improvements, the parties agree that Owner's Contribution will not exceed $11,000,000.
11.3 Owner's Advance. Subject to the right of reimbursement from proceeds of CFD No. 99-01, as part of Owner's Contribution Owner will advance up to one million dollars ($1,000,000) for the design, application processing, Resource Agency permitting, and other soft costs associated with the San Elijo Road Improvements, excluding construction costs and right of way acquisition ("Owner's Advance").
11.4 Owner's Financial Assurances. In the event a financial consultant mutually acceptable to the parties determines, in his or her professional judgment, that CFD No. 99-01 will not generate Owner's Contribution, Owner will provide financial assurances to the City and Agency, acceptable to all parties in their reasonable discretion, demonstrating Owner's ability to fund the shortfall.
11.5 City/Agency Financial Assurances. The City and Agency represent and warrant the availability of the City/Agency Contribution to ensure timely completion of the San Elijo Road Improvements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the City of San Marcos, acting by and through its City Manager pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-04 (2003MOD), and by the San Marcos Redevelopment Agency acting by and through its Executive Director pursuant to Resolution No. RDA 2003-341, and by Owner.
Dated this 11th day of February, 2004.
SAN MARCOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS By: /s/ Rick Gittings By: /s/ Rick Gittings ----------------------------------- --------------------------- Rick Gittings, Executive Director Rick Gittings, City Manager OWNER: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SAN MARCOS CITY ATTORNEY SAN ELIJO HILLS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: /s/ Helen Holmes Peak By: /s/ Curt R. Noland ---------------------------------- ------------------------------ Helen Holmes Peak, City Attorney Curt R. Noland, Vice President |
Exhibit 10.23
AMENDMENT
to the
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 dated as of December 31, 2003 to the ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2000 (such agreement as amended is referred to herein as the "Agreement") between Leucadia Financial Corporation, a Utah corporation ("Leucadia"), HomeFed Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("HomeFed"), HomeFed Resources Corporation, a California corporation ("HomeFed Resources") and HomeFed Communities, Inc., a California corporation ("HomeFed Communities").
The following new paragraph shall replace in its entirety paragraph 4 of the Agreement:
"4. Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall continue until December 31, 2004, unless extended in writing by mutual agreement of the parties. HomeFed shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, without restriction or penalty, upon 30 days prior written notice to the other party. In all events, the provisions of Section 7. "Indemnification" shall survive the termination of this Agreement, whether as a result of the passage of time or the election of HomeFed or otherwise."
In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the date first hereinabove written.
LEUCADIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Address: 529 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84102
By: ___________________________
Name: Joseph A. Orlando
Title: Vice President
HOMEFED CORPORATION
Address: 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220
Carlsbad, CA 92008
By: ___________________________
Name: Paul J. Borden
Title: President
HOMEFED RESOURCES CORPORATION
Address: 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220
Carlsbad, CA 92008
By: ___________________________
Name: Paul J. Borden
Title: President
HOMEFED COMMUNITIES, INC.
Address: 1903 Wright Place, Suite 220
Carlsbad, CA 92008
By: ___________________________
Name: Paul J. Borden
Title: President
Exhibit 21
HomeFed Corporation
List of Subsidiaries
Name State of Incorporation/Organization ---- ----------------------------------- Bird Ranch Development Company, LLC Delaware CDS Devco California CDS Holding Corporation Delaware Flat Rock Land Company, LLC Delaware HomeFed Communities, Inc. California HomeFed Communities LLC Delaware HomeFed Resources Corporation California Paradise Glen Development Company, LLC Delaware Paradise Valley LLC Delaware Paradise Valley Communities No.1 California Otay Land Company, LLC Delaware Otay Valley Development Company, LLC Delaware Northfork Communities California Rampage Vineyard, LLC Delaware SEH Copper Creek, LLC Delaware SEH R, LLC California San Elijo Hills Construction Company California San Elijo Hills Development Company, LLC Delaware San Elijo Ranch, Inc. California |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Paul J. Borden, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HomeFed Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 10, 2004 By: /s/ Paul J. Borden -------------------------- Paul J. Borden President |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Erin N. Ruhe, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HomeFed Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 10, 2004 By: /s/ Erin N. Ruhe ------------------ Erin N. Ruhe Vice President, Treasurer and Controller |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Paul J. Borden, as President of HomeFed Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 10, 2004 By: /s/ Paul J. Borden ------------------------------- Paul J. Borden President |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Erin N. Ruhe, as Vice President and Controller of HomeFed Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 10, 2004 By: /s/ Erin N. Ruhe ------------------- Erin N. Ruhe Vice President, Treasurer and Controller |