Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

The terms “United Fire,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to United Fire & Casualty Company or United Fire & Casualty Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliate, as the context requires. In the opinion of the management of United Fire, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year. The Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The review report of Ernst & Young LLP as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2007 accompanies the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I.

We maintain our records in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance departments of the states in which we are domiciled. To the extent that certain of these practices differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we have made adjustments to present the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statement categories that are most dependent on management estimates and assumptions include investments, deferred policy acquisition costs, and future policy benefits and losses, claims and loss settlement expenses.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash, money market accounts and non-negotiable certificates of deposit with original maturities of twelve months or less. We made payments for income taxes of $45.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, compared to $13.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. We received tax refunds totaling $7.8 million in 2007, due primarily to an operating loss carryback from prior year losses. We made no significant payments of interest for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, other than interest credited to policyholders’ accounts.

6

Income Taxes

In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, our effective federal income tax rate was 29.9 percent, compared to 28.5 percent for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35.0 percent due principally to the effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest income, non-taxable dividend income, and the reduction in the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

In June 2006, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” was issued to clarify accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, as well as the derecognition of a tax position previously recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also prescribes expanded disclosure requirements for unrecognized tax benefits recorded. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Our adoption of this interpretation effective January 1, 2007, had no impact on our consolidated financial position.

We have recognized no liability for unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007. In addition, we have not accrued for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. However, if interest and penalties would need to be accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits, such amounts would be recognized as a component of federal income tax expense.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2003 and state income tax examination for years before 2001. There are no ongoing examinations of income tax returns by federal or state tax authorities.

Contingent Liabilities

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, United Fire & Casualty Company and our Louisiana property and casualty insurance subsidiary, Lafayette Insurance Company, as well as many other insurers in the Louisiana market, have been named as defendants in litigation commenced by policyholders. Some of these policyholders are seeking relief in their own right; other suits have been filed seeking class certification. These suits allege various improprieties in the claims settlement process, primarily underpayment of claims, and an entitlement to the statutory penalties associated with underpayment of claims, but the most important relief sought by plaintiffs in these suits is to have

7

the policies cover flood damage, even though the policies explicitly exclude flood as an insured peril. The class action litigation is in the early stages, and we cannot at this time make a determination as to the ultimate outcome or effect of this litigation on our financial position or operating results.

While we believe we have handled the claims of our policyholders consistent with policy language and applicable law, the litigation environment is challenging to insurers involved in hurricane litigation in Louisiana courts. Several recent lower court rulings in Louisiana and neighboring states have been adverse to insurers and have received considerable publicity. We maintain that because we were not a party to the litigation that resulted in these unfavorable rulings, the rulings should not directly impact us. Nevertheless, these developments present challenges to all insurers involved in hurricane litigation. We believe that the most unfavorable of the rulings should be corrected in the Louisiana appellate courts, when appeals are ruled upon by those courts.

In early August 2007, a Federal Appeals Court sitting in Louisiana issued a ruling that narrowly interprets property insurance coverage to exclude flood coverage, which is consistent with both policy language and the approach taken by most insurers. However, this court’s interpretation is not binding on state courts, and flood coverage remains in contention in state courts. If the state courts rule that flood coverage is provided by policies that exclude flood coverage, an interpretation that is contrary to that adopted by the Federal court, the exposure faced by United Fire & Casualty Company and Lafayette Insurance Company in the aggregate from individual policyholder suits could be material. Furthermore, plaintiffs seeking to be certified as a class, which could include a large number of members, could likewise potentially create material exposure for us.

The deadline for filing lawsuits on claims arising out of Katrina was September 4, 2007. In the several days leading up to that date, we were notified of many new lawsuits filed against the company. Including these additional lawsuits, we have resolved approximately one-sixth of the lawsuits filed against us by individual policyholders. We believe that there may be additional lawsuits filed by policyholders of which we are not aware.

We have established reserves, as a component of our losses and loss settlement expenses, for all claims in litigation commensurate with our evaluation of the potential outcome of those claims. We believe that, in the aggregate, these reserves should be adequate. However, the wave of litigation that we and other insurers face is unprecedented, so it is difficult to accurately predict an outcome. Additionally, many of the persons who will be involved in the determination of factual and legal issues were themselves affected by Hurricane Katrina, complicating the defense of these claims. Furthermore, the decisions of the courts in Louisiana have been inconsistent, which increases the risk of inconsistent outcomes of this litigation. Our evaluation of these claims and the adequacy of our recorded reserves may change if we encounter adverse developments in the further defense of these claims.

We consider all of our other litigation pending at September 30, 2007, to be ordinary, routine, and incidental to our business.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure and report many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities the opportunity to reduce the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently reviewing SFAS No. 159 to determine whether it will have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. Where applicable, SFAS No. 157 simplifies and codifies previously issued guidance on fair value. Although SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, its application may, in certain instances, change current practice. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently reviewing SFAS No. 157 to determine its impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

8

We have a nonqualified employee stock option plan that authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of United Fire common stock to employees, with 310,908 options available for future issuance at September 30, 2007. The plan is administered by the board of directors. The board has the authority to determine which employees will receive options, when options will be granted, and the terms and conditions of the options. The board may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan. Pursuant to the plan, the board may, in its sole discretion, grant options to any employees of United Fire or any of its affiliated companies. These options are granted to buy shares of United Fire’s common stock at the market value of the stock on the date of grant. The options vest and are exercisable in installments of not less than 20.0 percent of the number of shares covered by the option award each year from the grant date. To the extent not exercised, installments accumulate and are exercisable by the optionee, in whole or in part, in any subsequent year included in the option period, but not later than 10 years from the grant date. Stock options are generally granted free of charge to the eligible employees of United Fire as designated by the board of directors.

The activity in our nonqualified employee stock option plan is displayed in the following table.

We also have a nonqualified nonemployee director stock option and restricted stock plan that authorizes United Fire to grant restricted stock and nonqualified stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of United Fire’s common stock, with 120,003 options available for future issuance at September 30, 2007. The board has the authority to determine which nonemployee directors receive awards under the plan, when options and restricted stock shall be granted, the option price, the option expiration date, the date of grant, the vesting schedule of options or whether the options shall be immediately vested, the terms and conditions of options and restricted stock (other than those terms and conditions set forth in the plan) and the number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to an option agreement or restricted stock agreement. The board may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan.

The activity in our nonqualified nonemployee stock option plan is displayed in the following table.

For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 million and $.8 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2007, we have approximately $4.3 million in stock-based compensation that has yet to be recognized through our results of operations. This compensation will be recognized through our financial results as the underlying stock options vest.

9

Among the employee benefit plans we offer, the two most significant plans are a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan and an employee/retiree health and dental benefit plan.

All of our employees are eligible to participate in the noncontributory defined benefit pension plan after they have completed one year of service, attained 21 years of age, and met the hourly service requirements with United Fire. Under our pension plan, retirement benefits are a function of the number of years of service and the level of compensation. Our policy is to fund this plan on a current basis to the extent that the contribution is deductible under existing tax regulations.

All of our eligible employees and retirees are able to participate in our health and dental benefit plan. The plan is composed of two programs: (1) the self-funded retiree health and dental benefit plan and (2) the self-funded employee health and dental benefit plan. The plan provides health and dental benefits to our employees and retirees (and covered dependents) who have met the service and participation requirements stipulated by the plan. The plan’s contract administrators are responsible for making medical and dental care benefit payments. The plan requires participants to submit claims for reimbursement or payment to the claims administrator within 365 days after the end of the calendar year in which the charges were incurred.

Our pension and postretirement benefit costs are displayed in the following table.

We previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 that we expected to contribute $4.0 million to our pension plan in 2007. The actual amount contributed for 2007 is $4.4 million, with the last payment this year being made on October 15, 2007.

10

We have two reportable business segments in our operations: property and casualty insurance and life insurance. All of our property and casualty offices target a similar customer base, market the same products, and use the same marketing strategies, and are therefore aggregated. All of our insurance is sold domestically; we have no revenues allocable to foreign operations. Our management evaluates the two segments on the basis of both statutory accounting practices prescribed by our states of domicile and GAAP. We analyze results based on profitability (i.e., loss ratios), expenses, and return on equity. The basis we use to determine and analyze segments and to measure segment profit have not changed from that reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The following analysis has been reconciled to amounts reported in our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements to adjust for inter-segment eliminations.

11

We compute basic earnings per common share by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The potentially dilutive shares we consider in our diluted earnings per share calculation relate to our outstanding stock options.

We determine the dilutive effect of our outstanding stock options using the “treasury stock” method. Under this method, we assume the exercise of all of the outstanding options that have an exercise price less than the weighted average fair market value of our common stock during the period. This method assumes that the proceeds from the hypothetical stock option exercises are used to repurchase shares of common stock at the weighted-average fair market value of the stock during the period. The net of the assumed options exercised and assumed common shares repurchased represents the number of potentially dilutive common shares, which we add to the denominator of the earnings per share calculation.

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share are displayed in the following tables:

12