UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
  ___________________________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-6622
  WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE
INVESTMENT TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND
 
53-0261100
(State of incorporation)
 
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
6110 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD, SUITE 800, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20852
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (301) 984-9400
___________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
 
Name of exchange on which registered
Shares of Beneficial Interest
 
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
  ___________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.    YES  x    NO   o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES   x       NO   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    YES   o     NO   x   
As of August 1, 2014 , 66,631,386 common shares were outstanding.
 



WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
INDEX
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 

2


PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the three years ended December 31, 2013 included in Washington Real Estate Investment Trust’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3


WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA )

 
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
(Unaudited)
 
Assets
 
 
 
Land
$
519,859

 
$
426,575

Income producing property
1,853,982

 
1,675,652

 
2,373,841

 
2,102,227

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(600,171
)
 
(565,342
)
Net income producing property
1,773,670

 
1,536,885

Properties under development or held for future development
83,970

 
61,315

Total real estate held for investment, net
1,857,640

 
1,598,200

Investment in real estate sold or held for sale, net

 
79,901

Cash and cash equivalents
23,009

 
130,343

Restricted cash
11,369

 
9,189

Rents and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,765 and $6,783, respectively
55,583

 
48,756

Prepaid expenses and other assets
112,548

 
105,004

Other assets related to properties sold or held for sale

 
4,100

Total assets
$
2,060,149

 
$
1,975,493

Liabilities
 
 
 
Notes payable
$
746,956

 
$
846,703

Mortgage notes payable
406,975

 
294,671

Lines of credit

 

Accounts payable and other liabilities
59,719

 
51,742

Advance rents
13,172

 
13,529

Tenant security deposits
8,686

 
7,869

Liabilities related to properties sold or held for sale

 
1,533

Total liabilities
1,235,508

 
1,216,047

Equity
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity
 
 
 
Preferred shares; $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding

 

Shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 66,636 and 66,531 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
666

 
665

Additional paid in capital
1,152,647

 
1,151,174

Distributions in excess of net income
(331,373
)
 
(396,880
)
Total shareholders’ equity
821,940

 
754,959

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
2,701

 
4,487

Total equity
824,641

 
759,446

Total liabilities and equity
$
2,060,149

 
$
1,975,493

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

4


WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate rental revenue
$
72,254

 
$
65,915

 
$
140,865

 
$
130,475

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate expenses
25,528

 
23,670

 
51,870

 
46,224

Depreciation and amortization
24,401

 
21,037

 
47,154

 
42,160

Acquisition costs
1,933

 
87

 
4,978

 
300

General and administrative
4,828

 
4,005

 
9,257

 
7,867

 
56,690

 
48,799

 
113,259

 
96,551

Other operating income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of real estate
570

 

 
570

 

Real estate operating income
16,134

 
17,116

 
28,176

 
33,924

Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(14,985
)
 
(15,824
)
 
(29,515
)
 
(32,014
)
Other income
219

 
246

 
442

 
485

 
(14,766
)
 
(15,578
)
 
(29,073
)
 
(31,529
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
1,368

 
1,538

 
(897
)
 
2,395

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale

 
3,725

 
546

 
7,008

(Loss) gain on sale of real estate
(288
)
 

 
105,985

 
3,195

Net income
1,080

 
5,263

 
105,634

 
12,598

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
7

 

 
7

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,087

 
$
5,263

 
$
105,641

 
$
12,598

Basic net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.02

 
$
0.02

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.04

Discontinued operations

 
0.06

 
1.59

 
0.15

Net income per share
$
0.02

 
$
0.08

 
$
1.58

 
$
0.19

Diluted net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.02

 
$
0.02

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.04

Discontinued operations

 
0.06

 
1.59

 
0.15

Net income per share
$
0.02

 
$
0.08

 
$
1.58

 
$
0.19

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
66,732

 
66,405

 
66,718

 
66,399

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
66,761

 
66,556

 
66,718

 
66,537

Dividends declared per share
$
0.3000

 
$
0.3000

 
$
0.6000

 
$
0.6000


See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

5


WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
Shares Outstanding
 
Shares of Beneficial Interest at Par Value
 
Additional Paid in Capital
 
Distributions in Excess of Net Income Attributable to the Controlling Interests
 
Total Shareholders’ Equity
 
Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
 
Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2013
66,531

 
$
665

 
$
1,151,174

 
$
(396,880
)
 
$
754,959

 
$
4,487

 
$
759,446

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

 

 

 
105,641

 
105,641

 
 
 
105,641

Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7
)
 
(7
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 
(1,784
)
 
(1,784
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 
5

 
5

Dividends

 

 

 
(40,134
)
 
(40,134
)
 

 
(40,134
)
Share grants, net of share grant amortization and forfeitures
105

 
1

 
1,473

 

 
1,474

 

 
1,474

Balance, June 30, 2014
66,636

 
$
666

 
$
1,152,647

 
$
(331,373
)
 
$
821,940

 
$
2,701

 
$
824,641


See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

6


WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
Net income
$
105,634

 
$
12,598

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations
47,154

 
51,106

Provision for losses on accounts receivable
727

 
2,291

Net gain on sale of real estate
(106,555
)
 
(3,195
)
Amortization of share grants, net
2,505

 
2,390

Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and related financing costs
1,754

 
1,989

Changes in operating other assets
(8,035
)
 
(1,515
)
Changes in operating other liabilities
(4,061
)
 
(2,671
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
39,123

 
62,993

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
Real estate acquisitions, net
(154,126
)
 

Net cash received for sale of real estate
190,864

 
15,161

Capital improvements to real estate
(28,947
)
 
(25,069
)
Development in progress
(13,573
)
 
(6,505
)
Real estate deposits, net
(1,250
)
 
(3,900
)
Cash held in replacement reserve escrows
(95
)
 

Non-real estate capital improvements
(41
)
 
(109
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(7,168
)
 
(20,422
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
Line of credit borrowings, net

 
75,000

Dividends paid
(40,134
)
 
(40,099
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
5

 
390

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(3,454
)
 

Payment of financing costs
(660
)
 

Principal payments – mortgage notes payable
(1,794
)
 
(31,267
)
Borrowings under construction loan
6,748

 

Notes payable repayments
(100,000
)
 
(60,000
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(139,289
)
 
(55,976
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(107,334
)
 
(13,405
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
130,343

 
19,324

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
23,009

 
$
5,919

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
$
29,835

 
$
32,643

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
$
156

 
$
4

(Increase) decrease in accrued capital improvements and development costs
$
(9,082
)
 
$
683

Mortgage notes payable assumed in connection with the acquisition of real estate
$
100,861

 
$


See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

7


WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2014
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”), a Maryland real estate investment trust, is a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business consists of the ownership and operation of income-producing real estate properties in the greater Washington metro region. We own a diversified portfolio of office buildings, multifamily buildings and retail centers.
Federal Income Taxes
We believe that we qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (a) reinvesting the sales proceeds of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (b) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to Washington REIT or (c) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders. During the first quarter of 2014, we closed on Transactions III (for the sale of Woodburn Medical Park I and II) and IV (for the sale of Prosperity Medical Center I, II and III) of the Medical Office Portfolio sale for an aggregate contract sales price of $193.6 million . We have reinvested a portion of the Medical Office Portfolio sales proceeds in replacement properties through a deferred tax exchange.
Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed REIT taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Our TRSs are subject to corporate federal and state income tax on their taxable income at regular statutory rates or as calculated under the alternative minimum tax, as appropriate. There were no material income tax provisions or material net deferred income tax items for our TRSs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 .
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Significant Accounting Policies
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements using the accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity , which changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Specifically, under this ASU only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements. The primary impact of this ASU is that we are no longer required to report the disposal of every operating property in discontinued operations. Adoption of this ASU is required for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. We early adopted this ASU effective for the first quarter of 2014.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , which creates a single source of revenue guidance. The new standard provides accounting guidance for all revenue arising from contracts with customers and affects all entities that enter into contracts to provide goods or services to their customers (unless the contracts are in the scope of other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requirements, such as the leasing literature). The guidance also provides a model for the measurement and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of certain nonfinancial assets, such as property and equipment, including real estate. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods therein. Early adoption is not permitted for public entities. We are currently evaluating the impact the new standard may have on Washington REIT.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Washington REIT, our majority-owned subsidiaries and entities in which Washington REIT has a controlling interest, including where Washington REIT has been determined to be a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). See note 3 for additional information on the

8


properties for which there is a noncontrolling interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 .
Within these notes to the financial statements, we refer to the three months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 as the “ 2014 Quarter” and the “ 2013 Quarter,” respectively, and the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 as the “ 2014 Period” and the “ 2013 Period,” respectively.
Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation due to the reclassification of certain properties as discontinued operations (see note 3).
NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE

Acquisitions

Washington REIT acquired the following properties during the 2014 Period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rentable
 
Contract
Purchase Price
Acquisition Date
 
Property Name
 
Type
 
Square Feet
 
(in thousands)
February 21, 2014
 
Yale West (216 units)
 
Multifamily
 
N/A

 
$
73,000

March 26, 2014
 
The Army Navy Club Building
 
Office
 
108,000

 
79,000

May 1, 2014
 
1775 Eye Street, NW
 
Office
 
185,000

 
104,500

 
 
 
 
 
 
293,000

 
$
256,500


The results of operations from the acquired operating properties are included in the consolidated statements of income as of their acquisition dates.

The revenue and earnings of our 2014 acquisitions are as follows (amounts in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Real estate rental revenue
$
4,598

 
$
5,355

Net loss
(1,297
)
 
(2,112
)

We record the acquired physical assets (land, building and tenant improvements), and in-place leases (absorption, tenant origination costs, leasing commissions, and net lease intangible assets/liabilities), and any other assets or liabilities at their fair values.


9


We have recorded the total purchase price of the above acquisitions as follows (in thousands):
Land
$
93,567

Buildings
141,456

Tenant origination costs
8,354

Leasing commissions/absorption costs
12,847

Net lease intangible assets
7,331

Net lease intangible liabilities
(2,122
)
Fair value of assumed mortgages
(107,125
)
Furniture fixtures and equipment
932

Total
$
155,240


The weighted remaining average life for the 2014 acquisition components above, other than land and building, are 74 months for tenant origination costs, 57 months for leasing commissions/absorption costs, 75 months for net lease intangible assets and 85 months for net lease intangible liabilities.
The difference in the total contract purchase price of $256.5 million for the 2014 acquisitions and the acquisition cost per the consolidated statement of cash flows of $154.1 million is primarily due to the assumption of two mortgage notes secured by Yale West and The Army Navy Club Building for an aggregate $100.9 million and the payment of a $3.6 million deposit for Yale West in 2013, partially offset by a credit to the seller for building renovations at 1775 Eye Street, NW for $1.9 million .

The following unaudited pro-forma combined condensed statements of operations are for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters and Periods as if the above described acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the period of acquisition and the same period in the year prior to acquisition. The unaudited pro-forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters and Periods. The unaudited data presented is in thousands, except per share data.
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Real estate rental revenue
$
72,863

 
$
71,122

 
$
145,867

 
$
140,833

Income (loss) from continuing operations
1,335

 
(108
)
 
(1,967
)
 
(879
)
Net income
1,047

 
3,617

 
104,564

 
9,324

Diluted earnings per share
0.02

 
0.05

 
1.57

 
0.14

Redevelopment
In the office segment, we have an active redevelopment project to renovate 7900 Westpark Drive. Our total investment in the renovation at 7900 Westpark Drive is expected to be $35.0 million . As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , we had invested $15.2 million and $3.6 million , respectively, in the renovation. We anticipate completion during the first quarter of 2015 .

Variable Interest Entities
In June 2011, we executed a joint venture operating agreement with a real estate development company to develop The Maxwell, a mid-rise multifamily property at 650 North Glebe Road in Arlington, Virginia. We estimate the total cost of the project to be $49.9 million . During the first quarter of 2013, we secured third-party debt financing for approximately 70% of the project's cost. Washington REIT is the 90% owner of the joint venture and will have management and leasing responsibilities when the project is completed and stabilized (defined as 90% of the residential units leased). The real estate development company owns 10% of the joint venture and is responsible for the development and construction of the property. The joint venture currently expects to complete this development project during the fourth quarter of 2014 .

In November 2011, we executed a joint venture operating agreement with a real estate development company to develop a high-rise multifamily property at 1225 First Street (formerly 1219 First Street) in Alexandria, Virginia. We estimate the total cost of the project to be $95.3 million , with approximately 70% of the project financed with debt. Washington REIT is the 95% owner of the joint venture and will have management and leasing responsibilities if the project is completed and stabilized. The real estate development company owns 5% of the joint venture and is responsible for the development and construction of the property. In the first quarter of 2013, we decided to delay commencement of construction due to market conditions and concerns of oversupply. We continue to reassess this project on a periodic basis going forward.

10



We have determined that The Maxwell and 1225 First Street joint ventures are VIE's primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit either entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. We expect that 70% of the total development costs for each project would be financed through debt. We have also determined that Washington REIT is the primary beneficiary of each VIE due to the fact that Washington REIT is providing 90% to 95% of the equity contributions and will manage each property after stabilization.

We include the joint venture land acquisitions on our consolidated balance sheets in properties under development or held for future development. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the land and capitalized development costs are as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
The Maxwell (formerly 650 North Glebe Road)
$
38,423

 
$
27,343

1225 First Street
20,797

 
20,788


As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to the joint ventures are as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
The Maxwell
$
5,195

 
$
1,785

1225 First Street
18

 
39


On February 21, 2013 , Washington REIT, through its consolidated joint venture to develop The Maxwell, entered into a construction loan agreement with Citizens Bank for $33.0 million . The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.15% , which decreases to LIBOR plus 2.0% upon completion of construction and the joint venture not being in default. The loan matures on February 21, 2016 , with two one year extension options exercisable by the joint venture, subject to fees and compliance with certain provisions in the loan agreement. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the consolidated joint venture had $14.0 million and $7.3 million , respectively, outstanding on this construction loan agreement.

Discontinued Operations

We dispose of assets that no longer meet our long-term strategy or return objectives and where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be reinvested into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders. Properties are considered held for sale when they meet the criteria specified (see "Discontinued Operations" in note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in Washington REIT's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 ). Depreciation on these properties is discontinued at that time, but operating revenues, other operating expenses and interest continue to be recognized until the date of sale.

In September 2013 , we entered into four separate purchase and sale agreements to effectuate the sale of our entire medical office segment (including land held for development at 4661 Kenmore Avenue) and two office buildings (Woodholme Center and 6565 Arlington Boulevard) for an aggregate purchase price of $500.8 million . The sale was structured as four transactions. Transactions I and II closed in November 2013 and Transactions III and IV closed in January 2014.

The results of our medical office segment are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Real estate rental revenue
$

 
$
11,010

 
$
892

 
$
22,039

Net income

 
3,439

 
546

 
6,260

Basic net income per share

 
0.05

 
0.01

 
0.09

Diluted net income per share

 
0.05

 
0.01

 
0.09



11


We sold the following properties in 2014 and 2013:
Property Name
 
Segment
 
Rentable Square Feet
 
Contract
Purchase  Price
(in thousands)
 
Gain on Sale
(in thousands)
Medical Office Portfolio Transactions III & IV (1)
 
Medical Office
 
427,000

 
$
193,561

 
$
105,985

5740 Columbia Road (2)
 
Retail
 
3,000

 
1,600

 
570

 
 
Total 2014
 
430,000

 
$
195,161

 
$
106,555

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Atrium Building
 
Office
 
79,000

 
$
15,750

 
$
3,195

Medical Office Portfolio Transactions I & II (3)
 
Medical Office / Office
 
1,093,000

 
307,189

 
18,949

 
 
Total 2013
 
1,172,000

 
$
322,939

 
$
22,144

(1)  
Woodburn Medical Park I and II and Prosperity Medical Center I, II and III.

(2) This property is classified as continuing operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08 (see note 2).

(3)  
2440 M Street, 15001 Shady Grove Road, 15505 Shady Grove Road, 19500 at Riverside Park (formerly Lansdowne Medical Office Building), 9707 Medical Center Drive, CentreMed I and II, 8301 Arlington Boulevard, Sterling Medical Office Building, Shady Grove Medical Village II, Alexandria Professional Center, Ashburn Farm Office Park I, Ashburn Farm Office Park II, Ashburn Farm Office Park III, Woodholme Medical Office Building, two office properties (6565 Arlington Boulevard and Woodholme Center) and undeveloped land at 4661 Kenmore Avenue.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , investment in real estate for properties sold or held for sale, all of which were in the medical office segment, was as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Investment in real estate sold or held for sale
$

 
$
125,967

Less accumulated depreciation

 
(46,066
)
Investment in real estate sold or held for sale, net
$

 
$
79,901

Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Real estate rental revenue
$

 
$
12,357

 
$
892

 
$
25,068

Real estate expenses

 
(3,759
)
 
(346
)
 
(8,457
)
Depreciation and amortization

 
(4,545
)
 

 
(8,947
)
Interest expense

 
(328
)
 

 
(656
)
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale
$

 
$
3,725

 
$
546

 
$
7,008


Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale by property for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Property
 
Segment
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Atrium Building
 
Office
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
185

Medical Office Portfolio
 
Medical Office / Office
 

 
3,725

 
546

 
6,823

 
 
 
 
$

 
$
3,725

 
$
546

 
$
7,008


12



NOTE 4: MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

In February 2014 , we assumed a $48.2 million mortgage note as partial consideration for the acquisition of Yale West. This mortgage note bears interest at 5.55% per annum. The fair value interest rate on this mortgage note is 3.75% based on quotes obtained for similar loans. We recorded the mortgage note at its estimated fair value of $54.0 million . Principal and interest are payable monthly until January 1, 2052 , at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. The loan may be prepaid, without penalty, on January 31, 2022 or thereafter on the last business day of the month until maturity, with thirty days prior written notice to the lender.

In March 2014 , we assumed a $52.7 million mortgage note as partial consideration for acquisition of The Army Navy Club Building. This mortgage note bears interest at 3.45% per annum. The fair value interest rate on this mortgage note is 3.18% based on quotes obtained for similar loans. We recorded the mortgage at its estimated fair value of $53.2 million . Principal and interest are payable monthly until May 1, 2017 , at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full.
NOTE 5: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE
As of June 30, 2014 , we maintained a $100.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in June 2015 ("Credit Facility No. 1") and a $400.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2016 ("Credit Facility No. 2"). Credit Facilities No. 1 and No. 2 have accordion features that allow us to increase the facilities to $200.0 million and $600.0 million , respectively, subject to additional lender commitments.
The amounts of these lines of credit unused and available at June 30, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
 
Credit Facility
No. 1
 
Credit Facility
No. 2
Committed capacity
$
100,000

 
$
400,000

Borrowings outstanding

 

Unused and available
$
100,000

 
$
400,000


We had no borrowings and no repayments on the unsecured lines of credit during the 2014 Period.
NOTE 6: NOTES PAYABLE
We repaid without penalty the $100.0 million of our 5.25% unsecured notes on their due date of January 15, 2014 , using proceeds from the sale of the Medical Office Portfolio.
NOTE 7: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Washington REIT maintains short-term ("STIP") and long-term ("LTIP") incentive plans that allow for stock-based awards to officers and non-officer employees. Stock based awards are provided to officers and non-officer employees, as well as trustees, under the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan which allows for awards in the form of restricted shares, restricted share units, options and other awards up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares over the ten year period in which the plan will be in effect. Restricted share units are converted into shares of our stock upon full vesting through the issuance of new shares.

During the 2014 Period, the Board of Trustees adopted a new STIP and new LTIP for executive officers. Regarding the new STIP, the changes from the prior STIP primarily removed the 15% service-only component of the award, maintaining an award payable 50% in cash and 50% in stock. The new LTIP is based entirely on total shareholder return during a defined three-year period. The LTIP was also converted from a single three-year plan structure to a “rolling” structure in which a new three-year plan is commenced each year. The vesting at the end of the performance period was modified to be 75% at the end of the performance period and 25% one year thereafter. In addition, during the transition period to the new LTIP, the Board of Trustees awarded similar transition awards with defined performance periods of one and two years and modified vesting to account for the transition.

Total Compensation Expense
Total compensation expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements for all outstanding share based awards was $1.4 million and $1.4 million for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters, respectively, and $2.5 million and $2.4 million for the 2014 and 2013 Periods, respectively.

Restricted Share Awards

13



The total fair values of restricted share awards vested was $0.7 million for the 2014 and 2013 Periods.

The total unvested restricted share awards at June 30, 2014 was 222,469 shares, which had a weighted average grant date fair value of $25.41 per share. As of June 30, 2014 , the total compensation cost related to unvested restricted share awards was $2.4 million , which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of 18 months.
NOTE 8: FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosures about the fair value measurements are required to be disclosed separately for each major category of assets and liabilities, as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs
The only assets or liabilities we had at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are the assets held in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (“SERP”). We base the valuations related to this asset on the observable market values of the investments that comprise the SERP (Level 2 inputs).
The fair values of these assets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SERP
$
3,606

 
$

 
$
3,606

 
$

 
$
3,290

 
$

 
$
3,290

 
$


Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value
The following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management using available market information and established valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow. Many of these estimates involve significant judgment. The estimated fair value disclosed may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have an effect on the estimated fair value amounts. In addition, fair value estimates are made at a point in time and thus, estimates of fair value subsequent to June 30, 2014 may differ significantly from the amounts presented.
Following is a summary of significant methodologies used in estimating fair values and a schedule of fair values at June 30, 2014 .
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash include cash and commercial paper with original maturities of less than 90 days, which are valued at the carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments (Level 1 inputs).
Notes Receivable
We acquired a note receivable ("2445 M Street note") in 2008 with the purchase of 2445 M Street. We estimate the fair value of the 2445 M Street note based on a discounted cash flow methodology using market discount rates (Level 3 inputs).
Debt
Mortgage notes payable consist of instruments in which certain of our real estate assets are used for collateral. We estimate the fair value of the mortgage notes payable by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads estimated through independent comparisons to real estate assets or loans with similar characteristics. Lines of credit payable consist of bank facilities which we use for various purposes including working capital, acquisition funding or capital improvements. The lines of credit advances are priced at a specified rate plus a spread. We estimate the market value based on a comparison of the spreads of the advances to market given the adjustable base rate. We estimate the fair value of the notes payable by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads derived using the relevant securities’ market prices. We

14


classify these fair value measurements as Level 3 as we use significant unobservable inputs and management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices.
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 , the carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents
$
23,009

 
$
23,009

 
$
130,343

 
$
130,343

Restricted cash
11,369

 
11,369

 
9,189

 
9,189

2445 M Street note
5,517

 
6,982

 
6,070

 
6,803

Mortgage notes payable
406,975

 
424,617

 
294,671

 
313,476

Notes payable
746,956

 
790,961

 
846,703

 
856,171

NOTE 9: EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

We determine “Basic earnings per share” using the two-class method as our unvested restricted share awards and units have non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are therefore considered participating securities. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to the controlling interest less the allocation of earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
We also determine “Diluted earnings per share” under the two-class method with respect to the unvested restricted share awards. We further evaluate any other potentially dilutive securities at the end of the period and adjust the basic earnings per share calculation for the impact of those securities that are dilutive. Our dilutive earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive impact of employee stock options based on the treasury stock method and our incentive share awards with performance or market conditions under the contingently issuable method. The diluted earnings per share calculation also considers operating partnership units (if any) under the if-converted method. We have a loss from continuing operations for the 2014 Period, and therefore diluted earnings per share is calculated in the same manner as basic earnings per share for this period.


15


The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
1,368

 
$
1,538

 
$
(897
)
 
$
2,395

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
7

 

 
7

 

Allocation of earnings to unvested restricted share awards
(17
)
 
(142
)
 
38

 
(262
)
Adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the controlling interests
1,358

 
1,396

 
(852
)
 
2,133

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale of real estate, net of taxes
(288
)
 
3,725

 
106,531

 
10,203

Allocation of earnings to unvested restricted share awards

 

 
(332
)
 

Adjusted (loss) income from discontinuing operations attributable to the controlling interests
(288
)
 
3,725

 
106,199

 
10,203

Adjusted net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,070

 
$
5,121

 
$
105,347

 
$
12,336

Denominator:
 
 
 
 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
66,732

 
66,405

 
66,718

 
66,399

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating partnership units

 
117

 

 
117

Employee stock options and restricted share awards
29

 
34

 

 
21

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
66,761

 
66,556

 
66,718

 
66,537

Earnings (loss) per common share, basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.02

 
$
0.02

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.04

Discontinued operations

 
0.06

 
1.59

 
0.15

 
$
0.02

 
$
0.08

 
$
1.58

 
$
0.19

Earnings (loss) per common share, diluted:

 

 

 

Continuing operations
$
0.02

 
$
0.02

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.04

Discontinued operations

 
0.06

 
1.59

 
0.15

 
$
0.02

 
$
0.08

 
$
1.58

 
$
0.19

NOTE 10: SEGMENT INFORMATION
We have three reportable segments: office, retail and multifamily. Office buildings provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Retail shopping centers are typically grocery store anchored neighborhood centers that include other small shop tenants or regional power centers with several junior box tenants. Multifamily properties provide rental housing for individuals and families throughout the Washington metropolitan area. During the 2014 Period, we completed the sale of our medical office segment (see note 3).
We evaluate performance based upon operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable operating segments are consolidations of similar properties. GAAP requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segments’ performance. Net operating income is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss. Net operating income is defined as segment real estate rental revenue less segment real estate expenses.
The following tables present revenues, net operating income, capital expenditures and total assets for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters and Periods from these segments, and reconciles net operating income of reportable segments to net income attributable to the controlling interests as reported (in thousands):

16


 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
Office
 
Retail
 
Multifamily
 
Corporate and Other
 
Consolidated
Real estate rental revenue
$
41,876

 
$
14,759

 
$
15,619

 
$

 
$
72,254

Real estate expenses
15,817

 
3,237

 
6,474

 

 
25,528

Net operating income
$
26,059

 
$
11,522

 
$
9,145

 
$

 
$
46,726

Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(24,401
)
General and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,828
)
Acquisition costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,933
)
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(14,985
)
Other income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
219

Gain on sale of real estate (classified as continuing operations)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
570

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss on sale of real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(288
)
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,080

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7

Net income attributable to the controlling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,087

Capital expenditures
$
14,467

 
$
1,010

 
$
3,101

 
$
24

 
$
18,602

Total assets
$
1,273,404

 
$
337,513

 
$
397,454

 
$
51,778

 
$
2,060,149

 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
Office
 
Medical
Office
 
Retail
 
Multifamily
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Consolidated
Real estate rental revenue
$
38,235

 
$

 
$
14,281

 
$
13,399

 
$

 
$
65,915

Real estate expenses
14,581

 

 
3,583

 
5,506

 

 
23,670

Net operating income
$
23,654

 
$

 
$
10,698

 
$
7,893

 
$

 
$
42,245

Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(21,037
)
Acquisition costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(87
)
General and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,005
)
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(15,824
)
Other income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
246

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,725

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,263

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,263

Capital expenditures
$
9,663

 
$
1,453

 
$
1,768

 
$
1,983

 
$
102

 
$
14,969

Total assets
$
1,116,570

 
$
321,532

 
$
349,937

 
$
251,604

 
$
41,099

 
$
2,080,742


17


 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
Office
 
Retail
 
Multifamily
 
Corporate and Other
 
Consolidated
Real estate rental revenue
$
80,940

 
$
29,384

 
$
30,541

 

 
$
140,865

Real estate expenses
31,513

 
7,468

 
12,889

 

 
51,870

Net operating income
$
49,427

 
$
21,916

 
$
17,652

 

 
$
88,995

Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(47,154
)
General and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(9,257
)
Acquisition costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,978
)
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(29,515
)
Other income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
442

Gain on sale of real estate (classified as continuing operations)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
570

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
546

Gain on sale of real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
105,985

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
105,634

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7

Net income attributable to the controlling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
105,641

Capital expenditures
$
23,170

 
$
1,120

 
$
4,657

 
$
41

 
$
28,988

 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
Office
 
Medical
Office
 
Retail
 
Multifamily
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Consolidated
Real estate rental revenue
$
75,628

 
$

 
$
28,115

 
$
26,732

 
$

 
$
130,475

Real estate expenses
28,180

 

 
7,148

 
10,896

 

 
46,224

Net operating income
$
47,448

 
$

 
$
20,967

 
$
15,836

 
$

 
$
84,251

Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(42,160
)
Acquisition costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(300
)
General and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7,867
)
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(32,014
)
Other income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
485

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,008

Gain on sale of real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,195

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,598

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
12,598

Capital expenditures
$
17,238

 
$
2,530

 
$
2,534

 
$
2,767

 
$
109

 
$
25,178



18


ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report and the more detailed information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014.
We refer to the three months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 as the “ 2014 Quarter” and the “ 2013 Quarter,” respectively, and the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 as the “ 2014 Period” and the “ 2013 Period,” respectively.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements in this report preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “project,” “will” and other similar expressions. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for these statements. The following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: (a) the effect of credit and financial market conditions; (b) the availability and cost of capital; (c) fluctuations in interest rates; (d) the economic health of our tenants; (e) the timing and pricing of lease transactions; (f) the economic health of the greater Washington metro region, or other markets we may enter; (g) the effects of changes in Federal government spending; (h) the supply of competing properties; (i) consumer confidence; (j) unemployment rates; (k) consumer tastes and preferences; (l) our future capital requirements; (m) inflation; (n) compliance with applicable laws, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities; (o) governmental or regulatory actions and initiatives; (p) changes in general economic and business conditions; (q) terrorist attacks or actions; (r) acts of war; (s) weather conditions; (t) the effects of changes in capital available to the technology and biotechnology sectors of the economy, and (u) other factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014. We undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect new information, future events, or otherwise.
General
Introductory Matters
We provide our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations and financial condition. We organize the MD&A as follows:
Overview. Discussion of our business, operating results, investment activity and capital requirements, and summary of our significant transactions to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.
Results of Operations. Discussion of our financial results comparing the 2014 Quarter to the 2013 Quarter and the 2014 Period to the 2013 Period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. Discussion of our financial condition and analysis of changes in our capital structure and cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Descriptions of accounting policies that reflect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
When evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, we focus on the following financial and non-financial indicators:
Net operating income (“NOI”), calculated as real estate rental revenue less real estate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income;
Funds From Operations (“FFO”), calculated as set forth below under the caption “Funds from Operations.” FFO is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income;
Occupancy, calculated as occupied square footage as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period;
Leased percentage, calculated as the percentage of available physical net rentable area leased for our commercial segments and percentage of apartments leased for our multifamily segment;
Rental rates; and

19


Leasing activity, including new leases, renewals and expirations.

For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our properties as “same-store”, “non-same-store” or discontinued operations. A "same-store" property is one that was owned for the entirety of the periods being evaluated and excludes properties under redevelopment or development and properties purchased or sold at any time during the periods being compared. A "non-same-store" property is one that was acquired, under redevelopment or development, or placed into service during either of the periods being evaluated. We define redevelopment properties as those for which we expect to spend significant development and construction costs on existing or acquired buildings pursuant to a formal plan which has a current impact on operating results, occupancy and the ability to lease space with the intended result of a higher economic return on the property. Properties under redevelopment or development are included within the non-same-store properties beginning in the period during which redevelopment or development activities commence. Redevelopment and development properties are included in the same-store pool upon completion of the redevelopment or development, and the earlier of achieving 90% occupancy or two years after completion.

Overview

Business

Our revenues are derived primarily from the ownership and operation of income-producing properties in the greater Washington metro region. As of June 30, 2014 , we owned a diversified portfolio of 54 properties, totaling approximately 7.3 million square feet of commercial space and 2,540 multifamily units, and land held for development. These 54 properties consisted of 25 office properties, 16 retail centers and 13 multifamily properties.

Operating Results

Real estate rental revenue, NOI, net income attributable to the controlling interests and FFO for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands):  
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real estate rental revenue
$
72,254

 
$
65,915

 
$
6,339

 
9.6
 %
NOI (1)
$
46,726

 
$
42,245

 
$
4,481

 
10.6
 %
Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,087

 
$
5,263

 
$
(4,176
)
 
(79.3
)%
FFO (2)
$
25,206

 
$
30,845

 
$
(5,639
)
 
(18.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)  See page 25  of the MD&A for reconciliations of NOI to net income.
(2)  See page 35  of the MD&A for reconciliations of FFO to net income.
 

The increase in NOI is due to acquisitions and higher NOI from same-store properties primarily due to higher occupancy and rental rates. Same-store occupancy increased to 92.6% from 90.0% one year ago, with increases in all segments.

Investment Activity

We acquired 1775 Eye Street, NW, an office property in Washington, DC, during the 2014 Quarter. We funded the purchase price with proceeds from the sale of the Medical Office Portfolio. This acquisition is consistent with our current strategy of focusing on properties inside the Washington metro region's Beltway, near major transportation nodes and in areas of strong employment drivers and superior growth demographics.
Capital Requirements
There are no debt maturities for the remainder of 2014, though we will continue to make recurring principal amortization payments. As of June 30, 2014 , our unsecured lines of credit had no borrowings outstanding, leaving a remaining borrowing capacity of $500.0 million .

20


Significant Transactions
Our significant transactions during the 2014 and 2013 Periods are summarized as follows:
2014 Period
The disposition of the Woodburn Medical Park I and II and Prosperity Medical Center I, II and III medical office buildings with a combined 427,000 square feet, for a contract sales price of $193.6 million , resulting in a gain on sale of $106.0 million . These sales transactions completed the disposition of the Medical Office Portfolio.
The acquisition of Yale West, a 216-unit multifamily property in Washington, DC, for a contract purchase price of $73.0 million. We assumed a $48.2 million mortgage with this acquisition. We incurred $1.8 million of acquisition costs related to this transaction.
The acquisition of The Army Navy Club Building, a 108,000 square foot office property in Washington, DC, for a contract purchase price of $79.0 million. We assumed a $52.7 million mortgage with this acquisition. We incurred $1.3 million of acquisition costs with this transaction.
The acquisition of 1775 Eye Street, NW, a 185,000 square foot office property in Washington, DC, for a contract purchase price of $104.5 million. We incurred $1.7 million of acquisition costs with this transaction.
The execution of new leases for 0.4 million square feet of commercial space with an average rental rate increase of 10.6% over expiring leases.
2013 Period
The disposition of the Atrium Building, an 80,000 square foot office building, for a contract sales price of $15.8 million, resulting in a gain on sale of $3.2 million.
The execution of new leases for 0.8 million square feet of commercial space with an average rental rate increase of 9.7% over expiring leases.
Results of Operations
The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters and Periods. The ability to compare one period to another may be significantly affected by acquisitions completed and dispositions made during those periods. To provide more insight into our operating results, we divide our discussion into two main sections:
Consolidated Results of Operations : Overview analysis of results on a consolidated basis.
Net Operating Income : Detailed analysis of same-store and non-same-store NOI results by segment.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Real Estate Rental Revenue
Real estate rental revenue for properties classified as continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Minimum base rent
$
61,247

 
$
56,541

 
$
4,706

 
8.3
 %
 
$
118,993

 
$
112,611

 
$
6,382

 
5.7
 %
Recoveries from tenants
7,575

 
6,997

 
578

 
8.3
 %
 
15,636

 
13,583

 
2,053

 
15.1
 %
Provisions for doubtful accounts
(418
)
 
(917
)
 
499

 
(54.4
)%
 
(1,135
)
 
(1,912
)
 
777

 
(40.6
)%
Lease termination fees
317

 
142

 
175

 
123.2
 %
 
797

 
189

 
608

 
321.7
 %
Parking and other tenant charges
3,533

 
3,152

 
381

 
12.1
 %
 
6,574

 
6,004

 
570

 
9.5
 %
 
$
72,254

 
$
65,915

 
$
6,339

 
9.6
 %
 
$
140,865

 
$
130,475

 
$
10,390

 
8.0
 %

Minimum Base Rent : Minimum base rent increased by $4.7 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions ($4.2 million) and higher occupancy ($1.5 million) and rental rates ($0.5 million) at same-store properties, partially offset by lower occupancy ($1.3 million) at 7900 Westpark Drive, which is under redevelopment.


21


Minimum base rent increased by $6.4 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to acquisitions ($5.7 million) and higher occupancy ($2.1 million) and rental rates ($1.1 million) at same-store properties, partially offset by lower occupancy ($2.2 million) at 7900 Westpark Drive, which is under redevelopment.

Recoveries from Tenants: Recoveries from tenants increased by $0.6 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions ($1.0 million), partially offset by lower reimbursements for real estate taxes ($0.2 million) at same-store properties.

Recoveries from tenants increased by $2.1 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher reimbursements for operating expenses at same-store properties ($1.4 million) and to acquisitions ($1.1 million), partially offset by lower reimbursements ($0.3 million) at 7900 Westpark Drive, which is under redevelopment.

Provisions for Doubtful Accounts: Provisions for doubtful accounts decreased by $0.5 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to lower net provisions in the office ($0.3 million) and retail ($0.2 million) segments.

Provisions for doubtful accounts decreased by $0.8 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to lower net provisions in the office ($0.4 million) and retail ($0.4 million) segments.

Lease Termination Fees: Lease termination fees increased by $0.2 million in the 2014 Quarter due to lease terminations in the office segment.

Lease termination fees increased by $0.6 million in the 2014 Period due to lease terminations in the office segment.

Parking and Other Tenant Charges : Parking and other tenant charges increased by $0.4 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions.

Parking and other tenant charges increased by $0.6 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to acquisitions ($0.4 million) and higher parking income at same-store properties ($0.1 million).

Occupancy by segment for properties classified as continuing operations as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:
 
As of June 30,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Change
Office
86.2
%
 
86.3
%
 
(0.1
)%
Retail
94.2
%
 
93.2
%
 
1.0
 %
Multifamily
93.7
%
 
93.1
%
 
0.6
 %
Total
90.1
%
 
89.6
%
 
0.5
 %

Occupancy represents occupied square footage indicated as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period.
A detailed discussion of occupancy by segment can be found in the Net Operating Income section.
Real Estate Expenses
Real estate expenses for properties classified as continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Property operating expenses
$
17,448

 
$
16,344

 
$
1,104

 
6.8
%
 
$
36,003

 
$
32,017

 
$
3,986

 
12.4
%
Real estate taxes
8,080

 
7,326

 
754

 
10.3
%
 
15,867

 
14,207

 
1,660

 
11.7
%
 
$
25,528

 
$
23,670

 
$
1,858

 
7.8
%
 
$
51,870

 
$
46,224

 
$
5,646

 
12.2
%

Real estate expenses as a percentage of revenue were 35.3% and 35.9% for the 2014 and 2013 Quarters, respectively, and 36.8% and 35.4% for the 2014 and 2013 Periods, respectively.
Property Operating Expenses : Property operating expenses include utilities, repairs and maintenance, property administration and management, operating services, common area maintenance, property insurance, bad debt and other operating expenses.

22


Property operating expenses increased by $1.1 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions ($1.4 million), partially offset by higher recoveries of bad debt ($0.2 million).
Property operating expenses increased by $4.0 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to acquisitions ($1.9 million) and higher utilities ($1.5 million) and snow removal ($0.7 million) expenses at same-store properties.
Real Estate Taxes : Real estate taxes increased by $0.8 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions ($1.0 million), partially offset by lower assessments ($0.2 million) at same-store properties.
Real estate taxes increased by $1.7 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to acquisitions ($1.1 million) and higher assessments ($0.5 million) at same-store properties.

Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Depreciation and amortization
$
24,401

 
$
21,037

 
$
3,364

 
16.0
 %
 
$
47,154

 
$
42,160

 
$
4,994

 
11.8
 %
Interest expense
14,985

 
15,824

 
(839
)
 
(5.3
)%
 
29,515

 
32,014

 
(2,499
)
 
(7.8
)%
Acquisition costs
1,933

 
87

 
1,846

 
2,121.8
 %
 
4,978

 
300

 
4,678

 
1,559.3
 %
General and administrative
4,828

 
4,005

 
823

 
20.5
 %
 
9,257

 
7,867

 
1,390

 
17.7
 %
 
$
46,147

 
$
40,953

 
$
5,194

 
12.7
 %
 
$
90,904

 
$
82,341

 
$
8,563

 
10.4
 %

Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization increased by $3.4 million and $5.0 million in the 2014 Quarter and Period, respectively, primarily due to acquisitions.
Interest Expense : Interest expense by debt type for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Notes payable
$
9,302

 
$
10,647

 
$
(1,345
)
 
(12.6
)%
 
$
18,824

 
$
21,891

 
$
(3,067
)
 
(14.0
)%
Mortgages
5,554

 
4,526

 
1,028

 
22.7
 %
 
10,368

 
9,074

 
1,294

 
14.3
 %
Lines of credit
590

 
841

 
(251
)
 
(29.8
)%
 
1,177

 
1,532

 
(355
)
 
(23.2
)%
Capitalized interest
(461
)
 
(190
)
 
(271
)
 
142.6
 %
 
(854
)
 
(483
)
 
(371
)
 
76.8
 %
Total
$
14,985

 
$
15,824

 
$
(839
)
 
(5.3
)%
 
$
29,515

 
$
32,014

 
$
(2,499
)
 
(7.8
)%

Interest expense from notes payable decreased in the 2014 Quarter and Period primarily due to the repayment of $100.0 million of 5.25% unsecured notes in January 2014 and the repayment of $60.0 million of 5.125% notes in March 2013. Interest expense from mortgage notes increased primarily due to the assumption of mortgages with the acquisitions of Yale West and The Army Navy Club Building during the first quarter of 2014. Interest expense from our unsecured lines of credit decreased due to no borrowings during 2014. Capitalized interest increased because of higher expenditures on the development project at 650 North Glebe Road and the redevelopment project at 7900 Westpark Drive.
 
Acquisition Costs: Acquisition costs increased by $1.8 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to closing on the acquisition of 1775 Eye Street, NW.

Acquisition costs increased by $4.7 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to closing on the acquisitions of Yale West, The Army Navy Club Building and 1775 Eye Street, NW.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expense increased by $0.8 million in the 2014 Quarter, primarily due to higher severance ($0.5 million) and officer long-term incentive compensation ($0.4 million) expense.

General and administrative expense increased by $1.4 million in the 2014 Period, primarily due to higher severance ($0.6 million) and officer long-term incentive compensation ($0.7 million) expense.

23


Discontinued Operations
Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Revenues
$

 
$
12,357

 
$
(12,357
)
 
(100.0
)%
 
$
892

 
$
25,068

 
$
(24,176
)
 
(96.4
)%
Property expenses

 
(3,759
)
 
3,759

 
(100.0
)%
 
(346
)
 
(8,457
)
 
8,111

 
(95.9
)%
Depreciation and amortization

 
(4,545
)
 
4,545

 
(100.0
)%
 

 
(8,947
)
 
8,947

 
(100.0
)%
Interest expense

 
(328
)
 
328

 
(100.0
)%
 

 
(656
)
 
656

 
(100.0
)%
Total
$

 
$
3,725

 
$
(3,725
)
 
(100.0
)%
 
$
546

 
$
7,008

 
$
(6,462
)
 
(92.2
)%

The decrease in income from discontinued operations is primarily due to the sale of the Medical Office Portfolio in January 2014 and November 2013 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Net Operating Income
NOI is the primary performance measure we use to assess the results of our operations at the property level. We believe that NOI is useful as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations of trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. As a result of the foregoing, we provide NOI as a supplement to net income or income from continuing operations, calculated in accordance with GAAP. NOI does not represent net income or income from continuing operations, in either case calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to these measures as an indication of our operating performance. NOI is calculated as real estate rental revenue less real estate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization, interest expense and general and administrative expenses. A reconciliation of NOI to net income follows.

24


2014 Quarter Compared to 2013 Quarter
The following tables of selected operating data reconcile NOI to net income and provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2014 Quarter compared to the 2013 Quarter (in thousands).
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
64,348

 
$
62,485

 
$
1,863

 
3.0
 %
Non-same-store (1)
7,906

 
3,430

 
4,476

 
130.5
 %
Total real estate rental revenue
$
72,254

 
$
65,915

 
$
6,339

 
9.6
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
21,845

 
$
22,428

 
$
(583
)
 
(2.6
)%
Non-same-store (1)
3,683

 
1,242

 
2,441

 
196.5
 %
Total real estate expenses
$
25,528

 
$
23,670

 
$
1,858

 
7.8
 %
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
42,503

 
$
40,057

 
$
2,446

 
6.1
 %
Non-same-store (1)
4,223

 
2,188

 
2,035

 
93.0
 %
Total NOI
$
46,726

 
$
42,245

 
$
4,481

 
10.6
 %
Reconciliation to Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOI
$
46,726

 
$
42,245

 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
(24,401
)
 
(21,037
)
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of real estate (classified as continuing operations)
570

 

 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
(4,828
)
 
(4,005
)
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(14,985
)
 
(15,824
)
 
 
 
 
Other income
219

 
246

 
 
 
 
Acquisition costs
(1,933
)
 
(87
)
 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale (2)

 
3,725

 
 
 
 
Loss on sale of real estate
(288
)
 

 
 
 
 
Net income
1,080

 
5,263

 
 
 
 
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
7

 

 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,087

 
$
5,263

 
 
 
 

(1) Non-same-store properties classified as continuing operations include:
2014 Multifamily acquisition – Yale West
2014 Office acquisitions – The Army Navy Club Building and 1775 Eye Street, NW
2014 Retail disposition – 5740 Columbia Road (parcel at Gateway Overlook)
2013 Multifamily acquisition – The Paramount
2013 Office redevelopment property – 7900 Westpark Drive

(2)     Sold and held for sale properties classified as discontinued operations include:
2014 sold - Woodburn Medical Park I and II and Prosperity Medical Center I, II and III
2013 sold - Atrium Building and Medical Office Portfolio Transactions I and II (see note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements)
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $1.9 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to higher occupancy ($1.5 million), higher rental rates ($0.5 million) and lower reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.5 million), partially offset by higher rent abatements ($0.4 million) and lower reimbursements of real estate taxes ($0.2 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $0.6 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to higher recoveries of previously reserved receivables ($0.2 million) and lower real estate taxes ($0.2 million).

25


 
As of June 30,
Occupancy
2014
 
2013
Same-store
92.6
%
 
90.0
%
Non-same-store
71.3
%
 
84.1
%
Total
90.1
%
 
89.6
%
Same-store occupancy increased to 92.6% , with increases in all segments. The decrease in non-same-store occupancy is primarily due to lower occupancy at 7900 Westpark Drive, which is under redevelopment. During the 2014 Quarter, 49.8% of the commercial square footage expiring was renewed as compared to 65.8% in the 2013 Quarter, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2014 Quarter, we executed new leases (excluding leases at properties classified as held for sale) for 221,889 commercial square feet at an average rental rate of $34.39 per square foot, an increase of 8.0% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $41.46 per square foot.
An analysis of NOI by segment follows.
Office Segment:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
36,374

 
$
34,838

 
$
1,536

 
4.4
 %
Non-same-store (1)
5,502

 
3,397

 
2,105

 
62.0
 %
Total real estate rental revenue
$
41,876

 
$
38,235

 
$
3,641

 
9.5
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
13,162

 
$
13,342

 
$
(180
)
 
(1.3
)%
Non-same-store (1)
2,655

 
1,239

 
1,416

 
114.3
 %
Total real estate expenses
$
15,817

 
$
14,581

 
$
1,236

 
8.5
 %
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
23,212

 
$
21,496

 
$
1,716

 
8.0
 %
Non-same-store (1)
2,847

 
2,158

 
689

 
31.9
 %
Total NOI
$
26,059

 
$
23,654

 
$
2,405

 
10.2
 %
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 acquisitions – The Army Navy Club Building and 1775 Eye Street, NW
2013 redevelopment property – 7900 Westpark Drive
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $1.5 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to higher occupancy ($1.2 million), higher rental rates ($0.5 million) and lower reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.3 million), partially offset by higher rent abatements ($0.4 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $0.2 million primarily due to lower real estate taxes.
 
As of June 30,
Occupancy
2014
 
2013
Same-store
90.6
%
 
86.4
%
Non-same-store
64.4
%
 
84.0
%
Total
86.2
%
 
86.3
%
Same-store occupancy increased to 90.6% primarily due to higher occupancy at 2000 M Street and Braddock Metro Center. Non-same-store occupancy decreased to 64.4% primarily due to lower occupancy at 7900 Westpark Drive, which is under redevelopment. During the 2014 Quarter, 48.9% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 50.5% in the 2013 Quarter, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2014 Quarter, we executed new leases (excluding leases at properties classified as held for sale) for 179,053 square feet of office space at an average rental rate of $35.96 per square foot, an increase

26


of 9.5% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $40.53 per square foot.
Retail Segment:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
14,748

 
$
14,248

 
$
500

 
3.5
 %
Non-same-store (1)
11

 
33

 
(22
)
 
(66.7
)%
Total real estate rental revenue
$
14,759

 
$
14,281

 
$
478

 
3.3
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
3,231

 
$
3,580

 
$
(349
)
 
(9.7
)%
Non-same-store (1)
6

 
3

 
3

 
100.0
 %
Total real estate expenses
$
3,237

 
$
3,583

 
$
(346
)
 
(9.7
)%
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
11,517

 
$
10,668

 
$
849

 
8.0
 %
Non-same-store (1)
5

 
30

 
(25
)
 
(83.3
)%
Total NOI
$
11,522

 
$
10,698

 
$
824

 
7.7
 %
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 disposition – 5740 Columbia Road (parcel at Gateway Overlook)
Real estate rental revenue increased by $0.5 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to higher occupancy ($0.2 million) and lower provisions for uncollectible revenue ($0.2 million).
Real estate expenses decreased by $0.3 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to higher recoveries of previously reserved receivables.
 
As of June 30,
Occupancy
2014
 
2013
Same-store
94.2
%
 
93.2
%
Non-same-store
N/A

 
100.0
%
Total
94.2
%
 
93.2
%
Same-store occupancy increased to 94.2% primarily due to higher occupancy at the Montgomery Village Center and Montrose Shopping Center. During the 2014 Quarter, 100.0% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 84.6% in the 2013 Quarter. During the 2014 Quarter, we executed new leases for 42,836 square feet of retail space at an average rental rate of $29.24 , an increase of 3.7% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $45.37 per square foot.

27


Multifamily Segment:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
13,226

 
$
13,399

 
$
(173
)
 
(1.3
)%
Non-same-store (1)
2,393

 

 
2,393

 
N/A

Total real estate rental revenue
$
15,619

 
$
13,399

 
$
2,220

 
16.6
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
5,452

 
$
5,506

 
$
(54
)
 
(1.0
)%
Non-same-store (1)
1,022

 

 
1,022

 
N/A

Total real estate expenses
$
6,474

 
$
5,506

 
$
968

 
17.6
 %
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
7,774

 
$
7,893

 
$
(119
)
 
(1.5
)%
Non-same-store (1)
1,371

 

 
1,371

 
N/A

Total NOI
$
9,145

 
$
7,893

 
$
1,252

 
15.9
 %
 
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 Multifamily acquisition – Yale West
2013 Multifamily acquisition – The Paramount

Real estate rental revenue decreased by $0.2 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to lower reimbursements ($0.1 million) and higher rent abatements ($0.1 million).
Real estate expenses decreased by $0.1 million in the 2014 Quarter primarily due to lower utilities expense.
 
As of June 30,
Occupancy
2014
 
2013
Same-store
94.3
%
 
93.1
%
Non-same-store
89.3
%
 
N/A

Total
93.7
%
 
93.1
%
Same-store occupancy increased to 94.3% primarily due to higher occupancy at the Kenmore and Bennett Park, partially offset by lower occupancy at Munson Hill Towers.

28


2014 Period Compared to 2013 Period
The following tables of selected operating data reconcile NOI to net income and provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2014 Period compared to the 2013 Period (in thousands).
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
128,474

 
$
123,677

 
$
4,797

 
3.9
%
Non-same-store (1)
12,391

 
6,798

 
5,593

 
82.3
%
Total real estate rental revenue
$
140,865

 
$
130,475

 
$
10,390

 
8.0
%
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
46,158

 
$
43,653

 
$
2,505

 
5.7
%
Non-same-store (1)
5,712

 
2,571

 
3,141

 
122.2
%
Total real estate expenses
$
51,870

 
$
46,224

 
$
5,646

 
12.2
%
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
82,316

 
$
80,024

 
$
2,292

 
2.9
%
Non-same-store (1)
6,679

 
4,227

 
2,452

 
58.0
%
Total NOI
$
88,995

 
$
84,251

 
$
4,744

 
5.6
%
Reconciliation to Net Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOI
$
88,995

 
$
84,251

 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
(47,154
)
 
(42,160
)
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of real estate (classified as continuing operations)
570

 

 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
(9,257
)
 
(7,867
)
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(29,515
)
 
(32,014
)
 
 
 
 
Other income
442

 
485

 
 
 
 
Acquisition costs
(4,978
)
 
(300
)
 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale (2)
546

 
7,008

 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of real estate
105,985

 
3,195

 
 
 
 
Net income
105,634

 
12,598

 
 
 
 
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
7

 

 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
105,641

 
$
12,598

 
 
 
 

(1) Non-same-store properties classified as continuing operations include:
2014 Multifamily acquisition – Yale West
2014 Office acquisitions – The Army Navy Club Building and 1775 Eye Street, NW
2014 Retail disposition – 5740 Columbia Road (parcel at Gateway Overlook)
2013 Multifamily acquisition – The Paramount
2013 Office redevelopment property – 7900 Westpark Drive

(2)     Sold properties classified as discontinued operations include:
2014 sold - Woodburn Medical Park I and II and Prosperity Medical Center I, II and III
2013 sold - Atrium Building and Medical Office Portfolio Transactions I and II (see note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements)
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $4.8 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher occupancy ($2.1 million), higher reimbursements ($1.2 million), higher rental rates ($1.1 million), lower reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.8 million) and higher lease termination fees ($0.4 million), partially offset by higher rent abatements ($0.8 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $2.5 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher utilities ($1.5 million) and snow removal ($0.9 million) expenses.

29


During the 2014 Period, 65.1% of the commercial square footage expiring was renewed as compared to 69.2% in the 2013 Period, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2014 Period, we executed new leases for 381,867 commercial square feet at an average rental rate of $34.12 per square foot, an increase of 10.6% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $39.38 per square foot.
An analysis of NOI by segment follows.
Office Segment:
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
72,575

 
$
68,897

 
$
3,678

 
5.3
%
Non-same-store (1)
8,365

 
6,731

 
1,634

 
24.3
%
Total real estate rental revenue
$
80,940

 
$
75,628

 
$
5,312

 
7.0
%
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
27,526

 
$
25,620

 
$
1,906

 
7.4
%
Non-same-store (1)
3,987

 
2,560

 
1,427

 
55.7
%
Total real estate expenses
$
31,513

 
$
28,180

 
$
3,333

 
11.8
%
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
45,049

 
$
43,277

 
$
1,772

 
4.1
%
Non-same-store (1)
4,378

 
4,171

 
207

 
5.0
%
Total NOI
$
49,427

 
$
47,448

 
$
1,979

 
4.2
%
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 acquisition – The Army Navy Club Building and 1775 Eye Street, NW
2013 redevelopment property – 7900 Westpark Drive
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $3.7 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher occupancy ($1.8 million), higher rental rates ($0.9 million), higher reimbursements for operating expenses ($0.9 million) and lower provisions for uncollectible revenue ($0.4 million), partially offset by higher rent abatements ($0.6 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $1.9 million primarily due to higher utilities expenses ($1.3 million), real estate taxes ($0.2 million) and snow removal expenses ($0.1 million).
During the 2014 Period, 62.4% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 53.3% in the 2013 Period, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2014 Period, we executed new leases for 282,988 square feet of office space at an average rental rate of $35.66 per square foot, an increase of 10.8% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $44.67 per square foot.

30


Retail Segment:
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
29,338

 
$
28,048

 
$
1,290

 
4.6
 %
Non-same-store (1)
46

 
67

 
(21
)
 
(31.3
)%
Total real estate rental revenue
$
29,384

 
$
28,115

 
$
1,269

 
4.5
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
7,448

 
$
7,137

 
$
311

 
4.4
 %
Non-same-store (1)
20

 
11

 
9

 
81.8
 %
Total real estate expenses
$
7,468

 
$
7,148

 
$
320

 
4.5
 %
NOI


 


 


 


Same-store
$
21,890

 
$
20,911

 
$
979

 
4.7
 %
Non-same-store (1)
26

 
56

 
(30
)
 
(53.6
)%
Total NOI
$
21,916

 
$
20,967

 
$
949

 
4.5
 %
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 disposition – 5740 Columbia Road (parcel at Gateway Overlook)
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $1.3 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher reimbursements for operating expenses ($0.5 million), lower provisions for uncollectible revenue ($0.4 million) and higher occupancy ($0.3 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $0.3 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher snow removal expenses ($0.7 million) and real estate taxes ($0.1 million), partially offset by higher recoveries of bad debt ($0.6 million).
During the 2014 Period, 93.9% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 88.7% in the 2013 Period. During the 2014 Period, we executed new leases for 98,879 square feet of retail space at an average rental rate of $30.15 , an increase of 11.1% , with average tenant improvements and leasing commissions and incentives (including free rent) of $24.25 per square foot.

31


Multifamily Segment:
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Real Estate Rental Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
26,561

 
$
26,732

 
$
(171
)
 
(0.6
)%
Non-same-store (1)
3,980

 

 
3,980

 
N/A

Total real estate rental revenue
$
30,541

 
$
26,732

 
$
3,809

 
14.2
 %
Real Estate Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
11,184

 
$
10,896

 
$
288

 
2.6
 %
Non-same-store (1)
1,705

 

 
1,705

 
N/A

Total real estate expenses
$
12,889

 
$
10,896

 
$
1,993

 
18.3
 %
NOI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-store
$
15,377

 
$
15,836

 
$
(459
)
 
(2.9
)%
Non-same-store (1)
2,275

 

 
2,275

 
N/A

Total NOI
$
17,652

 
$
15,836

 
$
1,816

 
11.5
 %
 
(1) Non-same-store properties include:
2014 Multifamily acquisition – Yale West
2013 Multifamily acquisition – The Paramount

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties decreased by $0.2 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher rent abatements ($0.2 million) and lower occupancy ($0.1 million).
Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $0.3 million in the 2014 Period primarily due to higher utilities ($0.2 million) and snow removal ($0.1 million) expenses.


32


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Requirements
During 2014 , we expect that we will have significant capital requirements, including the following items. There can be no assurance that our capital requirements will not be materially higher or lower than these expectations.
Funding dividends and distributions to our shareholders;
Approximately $70.0 - $75.0 million to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets, including approximately $38.0 - $42.0 million to fund tenant-related capital requirements and leasing commissions;
Approximately $45.0 - $50.0 million to invest in our development and redevelopment projects; and
Funding for potential property acquisitions throughout the remainder of 2014 , offset by proceeds from property dispositions.
 
Debt Financing
Our total debt at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Mortgage notes payable
$
406,975

 
$
294,671

Lines of credit

 

Notes payable
746,956

 
846,703

 
$
1,153,931

 
$
1,141,374

Mortgage Notes Payable
At June 30, 2014 , our $407.0 million in mortgage notes payable, which include $4.0 million in net unamortized discounts due to fair value adjustments, bore an effective weighted average fair value interest rate of 5.3% and had an estimated weighted average maturity of 3.6 years. We may either assume mortgage debt from time-to-time in conjunction with property acquisitions or initiate mortgage debt on existing properties.
Lines of Credit
Our primary external sources of liquidity are our two revolving credit facilities. Credit Facility No. 1 is a four-year, $100.0 million unsecured credit facility maturing in June 2015, and may be extended by one year at our option. Credit Facility No. 2 is a four-year, $400.0 million unsecured credit facility maturing in July 2016, and may be extended for one year at our option. We had no borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2014 related to either credit facility.
Our unsecured credit facilities contain financial and other covenants with which we must comply. Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured credit facilities or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. This could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and would therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, our ability to draw on our unsecured credit facilities or incur other unsecured debt in the future could be restricted by the loan covenants. As of June 30, 2014 , we were in compliance with our loan covenants.
Notes Payable
We generally issue unsecured notes to fund our real estate assets long term. In issuing future unsecured notes, we intend to ladder the maturities of our debt to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk in future years.
As of June 30, 2014 , our unsecured notes have maturities ranging from May 2015 through February 2028, as follows (in thousands):
5.35% notes due 2015
$
150,000

4.95% notes due 2020
250,000

3.95% notes due 2022
300,000

7.25% notes due 2028
50,000

 
$
750,000

Our unsecured notes contain covenants with which we must comply. Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured notes could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. This could cause our debt holders to accelerate the timing of payments and would therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. As of June 30, 2014 , we were in compliance with our unsecured notes covenants.

33


From time to time, we may seek to repurchase and cancel our outstanding notes through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.
Common Equity
We have authorized for issuance 100.0 million common shares, of which 66.6 million shares were outstanding at June 30, 2014 .
We are party to a sales agency financing agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC relating to the issuance and sale of up to $250.0 million of our common shares from time to time over a period of no more than 36 months from June 2012. Sales of our common shares are made at market prices prevailing at the time of sale. We would use net proceeds from the sale of common shares under this program for general corporate purposes. As of June 30, 2014 , we have not issued any common shares under this program.

We have a dividend reinvestment program, whereby shareholders may use their dividends and optional cash payments to purchase common shares. The common shares sold under this program may either be common shares issued by us or common shares purchased in the open market. We did not issue any shares under this program during the 2014 Period.

Preferred Equity

Washington REIT's Board of Trustees can, at its discretion, authorize the issuance of up to 10.0 million shares of preferred stock. The ability to issue preferred equity provides Washington REIT an additional financing tool that may be used to raise capital for future acquisitions or other business purposes. As of June 30, 2014 , no shares of preferred stock had been issued.
Dividends
We currently pay dividends quarterly at a rate of $0.30 per share. The maintenance of our dividend level is subject to various factors reviewed by the Board of Trustees in its discretion. These factors include our results of operations, the availability of cash to make the necessary dividend payments and the effect of REIT distribution requirements, which require at least 90% of our taxable income to be distributed to shareholders. When setting the dividend level, our Board looks in particular at trends in our level of funds from operations, together with associated recurring capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and tenant incentives, and adjustments to straight-line rents to reflect cash rents received.
Our dividend and distribution payments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Common dividends
$
20,043

 
$
20,065

 
$
(22
)
 
(0.1
)%
 
$
40,134

 
$
40,099

 
$
35

 
0.1
%
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
1,784

 

 
1,784

 
N/A

 
1,784

 

 
1,784

 
N/A

 
$
21,827

 
$
20,065

 
$
1,762

 
8.8
 %
 
$
41,918

 
$
40,099

 
$
1,819

 
4.5
%
The $1.8 million distribution to noncontrolling interests is related to the disposition of 4661 Kenmore Avenue as part of the Medical Office Portfolio sale (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Historical Cash Flows
Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly, we may have to reduce our dividend. Consolidated cash flow information is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
39.1

 
$
63.0

 
$
(23.9
)
 
(37.9
)%
Net cash used in investing activities
(7.2
)
 
(20.4
)
 
13.2

 
(64.7
)%
Net used in financing activities
(139.3
)
 
(56.0
)
 
(83.3
)
 
148.8
 %
Cash provided by operating activities decreased primarily due to the loss of income from properties sold as part of the Medical Office Portfolio and higher acquisition costs.

34


Cash used in investing activities decreased primarily because the higher volume of acquisitions in the 2014 Period was partially offset by closing on Purchase and Sale Agreements #3 and #4 of the Medical Office Portfolio sale.
Cash used in financing activities increased primarily due to the repayment of the remaining $100.0 million of our 5.25% unsecured notes during the 2014 Quarter.
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Debt Service Coverage
The following table sets forth our ratios of earnings to fixed charges and debt service coverage for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 :
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Earnings to fixed charges (1)
1.06
x
 
1.08
x
 
0.94
x
 
1.06
x
Debt service coverage
2.54
x
 
2.78
x
 
2.43
x
 
2.73
x
(1) Due to Washington REIT's loss from continuing operations during the 2014 Period, the earnings to fixed charges ratio was less than 1:1. Washington REIT must have generated additional earnings of $1.7 million in the 2014 Period to achieve a ratio of 1:1.

We computed the ratio of earnings to fixed charges by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income from continuing operations attributable to the controlling interests plus fixed charges, less capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortized costs of debt issuance, and interest costs capitalized. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation due to the reclassification of certain properties as discontinued operations (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
We computed the debt service coverage ratio by dividing Adjusted EBITDA (which is earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, real estate impairment, gain on sale of real estate, gain/loss from the extinguishment of debt and gain/loss on non-disposal activities) by interest expense and principal amortization. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate for use in our debt service coverage ratio because it provides an estimate of the cash available to pay down long term debt. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to the controlling interests is in Exhibit 12 – Computation of Ratios.
Funds From Operations
FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for real estate companies. We provide FFO as a supplemental measure to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. Although FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for REITs, FFO does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. In addition, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) defines FFO (April, 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairments of depreciable real estate, if any, plus real estate depreciation and amortization. We consider FFO to be a standard supplemental measure for REITs because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which historically assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that FFO more accurately provides investors an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and fund other needs. Our FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs. These other REITs may not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.

35


The following table provides the calculation of our FFO and a reconciliation of FFO to net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,087

 
$
5,263

 
$
105,641

 
$
12,598

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
24,401

 
21,037

 
47,154

 
42,160

Net gain on sale of real estate
(282
)
 

 
(106,555
)
 
(3,195
)
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale

 
(3,725
)
 
(546
)
 
(7,008
)
Funds from continuing operations
25,206

 
22,575

 
45,694

 
44,555

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale

 
3,725

 
546

 
7,008

Depreciation and amortization

 
4,545

 

 
8,946

Funds from discontinued operations

 
8,270

 
546

 
15,954

FFO as defined by NAREIT
$
25,206

 
$
30,845

 
$
46,240

 
$
60,509

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We base the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We discuss the most critical estimates in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal material financial market risk to which we are exposed is interest-rate risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to refinancing long-term fixed rate obligations, the opportunity cost of fixed rate obligations in a falling interest rate environment and our variable rate lines of credit. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs.
As the majority of our outstanding debt is long-term, fixed rate debt, our interest rate risk has not changed significantly from what was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Financing.”
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in Washington REIT’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Washington REIT’s internal control over financial reporting.

36


PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
None.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION

On August 4, 2014, the Board of Trustees and Compensation Committee of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”) adopted an Executive Officer Severance Pay Plan (the “Severance Plan”) to provide specified benefits to executive officers in the event of their termination of employment from Washington REIT.
Under the Severance Plan, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment of an executive officer, the executive officer will be entitled to receive severance pay in accordance with the following matrix -
Weeks of Severance Pay
 
Base Salary
Years of Service
$170K but less
than $225K
$225K or more
Less than 1
12
14
1-4
16
18
5
18
20
6
20
22
7
22
24
8
24
26
9
26
28
10
28
30
11
30
32
12
32
34
13
34
36
14
36
38
15
38
40
16
40
42
17
42
44
18
44
46
19
46
48
20
48
50
21
50
52
22 or more
52
52


37


In addition to the severance pay set forth above, under the Severance Plan each executive officer will also be entitled to receive a severance benefit comprised of ongoing payment from Washington REIT equal to the employer portion of current medical, dental and vision elections for the period of severance (or, if less, the applicable COBRA payment). Any severance pay and severance benefits described above will be subject to applicable payroll and tax withholding.
Under the Severance Plan, for an executive officer to be eligible for severance pay and severance benefits, the termination of such executive officer must be by Washington REIT without “Cause” (as defined in Washington REIT’s short-term incentive plan) or by resignation of the executive officer for “Good Reason” (as defined in Washington REIT’s short-term incentive plan). Washington REIT also has the discretion under the Severance Plan to pay severance pay and benefits in other involuntary termination scenarios and to pay supplemental severance pay. In all cases, the executive officer must execute and not revoke Washington REIT’s standard form of separation agreement applicable to executive officers in order to receive severance pay and benefits.
Washington REIT will be required to make the severance payment in a lump-sum on or before March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the executive officer is terminated, but such portion of the payments (if any) that would constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code will not be paid until at least six months after the executive officer’s termination.
The severance pay and severance benefits under the Severance Plan are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any applicable equity vesting, acceleration of payment or other benefits that may exist under Washington REIT’s long-term incentive plan, short-term incentive plan, supplemental executive retirement plan and other compensation plans. If the executive officer is entitled to severance payments under a Change in Control Agreement with Washington REIT, then the executive officer will not also receive payment under the Severance Plan. In addition, for the President and Chief Executive Officer, he will be entitled to the severance payments under the Severance Plan or his employment letter with Washington REIT, whichever is greater. The Severance Plan defines participating executive officers to be officers at the level of President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President.
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File
Number
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
 
Filed
Herewith
10.50*
Long Term Incentive Plan (effective January 1, 2014)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
10.51*
Amendment to Short Term Incentive Plan (effective January 1, 2014)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
12
Computation of Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
31.2
Certification of the Executive Vice President – Accounting and Administration pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
31.3
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
32
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President – Accounting and Administration and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
101
The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10–Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) notes to these consolidated financial statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X

* Management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which trustees or executive officers are eligible to participate.

38


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Paul T. McDermott
 
 
Paul T. McDermott
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Laura M. Franklin
 
 
Laura M. Franklin
 
 
Executive Vice President
Accounting and Administration
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ William T. Camp
 
 
William T. Camp
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Finance Officer)

DATE: August 5, 2014

39

Exhibit 10.50
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(Effective January 1, 2014)

ARTICLE I. INTRODUCTION

1.1      Purpose . The purposes of the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) contained herein are to allow Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (the “ Trust ”) to attract and retain talented executives, to provide incentives to executives to achieve certain performance targets, and to link executive compensation to shareholder results by rewarding competitive and superior performance. In furtherance of those purposes, the Plan is designed to provide long-term incentive compensation to officers of the Trust, the amount of which is dependent on the degree of attainment of certain performance goals of the Trust over successive three-year performance periods commencing each year beginning with the three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2014.

1.2      Background . The Plan replaces the Long-Term Incentive Plan that became effective January 1, 2011 (the “ Prior Plan ”) with respect to the performance period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013. The Prior Plan shall remain in effect as to all remaining unvested restricted shares granted under the Prior Plan, which shall vest in accordance with the terms of the Prior Plan.
  
1.3      Overview . Each award under the Plan is initially expressed as a dollar amount that is a multiple of the participant’s annual base salary, which multiple varies depending on the participant’s job position and the degree of achievement of the performance goals over each three-year performance period under the Plan. The dollar amount is converted into a number of common shares of the Trust with equivalent value at the end of the three-year performance period. The awards are payable 75% in unrestricted (i.e., fully vested) common shares and 25% in restricted common shares that are subject to a vesting schedule that normally runs for one year after the completion of the three-year performance period. Grants under the Plan are made pursuant to and from the common share reserve established under the Trust’s 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan.

1.4      Effective Date . This Plan is effective as of January 1, 2014 (the “ Effective Date ”), and was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “ Committee ”) and by the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “ Board ”) on April 23, 2014.

ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS

2.1      Award ” means an award of fully vested Common Shares and Common Shares subject to vesting under the Plan.

2.2      Absolute Total Shareholder Return ” means annual compounded Total Shareholder Return for the Performance Period (or if a Change in Control occurs during the Performance Period, annualized compounded Total Shareholder Return for the Performance Period).




2.3      Beginning Share Price ” means the average closing price per Common Share for the twenty (20) trading days beginning on the first trading day of the Performance Period on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded.

2.4      Cause ” means

(a)      commission by the Participant of a felony or crime of moral turpitude;

(b)      conduct by the Participant in the performance of the Participant’s duties to the Trust which is illegal, dishonest, fraudulent or disloyal;

(c)      the breach by the Participant of any fiduciary duty the Participant owes to the Trust; or

(d)      gross neglect of duty which is not cured by the Participant to the reasonable satisfaction of the Trust within thirty (30) days of the Participant’s receipt of written notice from the Trust advising the Participant of said gross neglect

2.5      Change in Control ” means an event or occurrence set forth in any one or more of subsections (a) through (d) below (including any event or occurrence that constitutes a Change in Control under one of such subsections but is specifically exempted from another such subsection):

(a)      the acquisition by an individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”)) (a “ Person ”) of beneficial ownership of any shares of beneficial interest in the Trust if, after such acquisition, such Person beneficially owns (within the meaning of rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) forty percent (40%) or more of either (1) the then-outstanding shares of beneficial interest in the Trust (the “ Outstanding Trust Shares ”) or (2) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding shares of beneficial interest the Trust entitled to vote generally in the election of trustees (the “ Outstanding Trust Voting Shares ”); provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (a), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (A) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Trust or any corporation controlled by the Trust, or (B) any acquisition by any corporation or other entity pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (1) and (2) of subsection (c) of this Section; or

(b)      such time as the Continuing Trustees (as defined below) do not constitute a majority of the Board (or, if applicable, the board of directors or trustees of a successor corporation or other entity to the Trust), where the term “ Continuing Trustee ” means at any date a member of the Board (1) who was a member of the Board on the date hereof or (2) who was nominated or elected subsequent to the date hereof with the approval of other Board members who themselves constitute Continuing Trustees at the time of such nomination or election; provided, however, that there shall be excluded from this clause (2) any individual whose initial assumption of office occurred as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of trustees or other actual

2



or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents, by or on behalf of a person other than the Board; or

(c)      the consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization or statutory share exchange involving the Trust or a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Trust in one or a series of transactions (a “ Business Combination ”), unless, immediately following such Business Combination, each of the following two conditions is satisfied: (1) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners of the Outstanding Trust Shares and Outstanding Trust Voting Shares immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 60% of the then-outstanding shares of beneficial interest or stock, as the case may be, and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding shares or stock, as the case may be, entitled to vote generally in the election of trustees, or directors, as the case may be, respectively, of the resulting or acquiring corporation or other entity in such Business Combination (which shall include, without limitation, a corporation or other entity which as a result of such transaction owns the Trust or substantially all of the Trust’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) (such resulting or acquiring corporation or other entity referred to herein as the “ Acquiring Entity ”) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the Outstanding Trust Shares and Outstanding Trust Voting Shares, respectively; and (2) no Person (excluding the Acquiring Entity or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) maintained or sponsored by the Trust or by the Acquiring Entity) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 40% or more of the then outstanding shares of beneficial interest or stock, as the case may be, of the Acquiring Entity, or of the combined voting power of the then-outstanding shares of such corporation or other entity entitled to vote generally in the election of trustees or directors, as the case may be; or

(d)      a liquidation or dissolution of the Trust.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred unless the event also constitutes a “change in the ownership or effective control of the corporation or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the corporation” within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(v) of the Internal Revenue Code.

2.6      Common Shares ” means common shares of the Trust.
2.7      Disability ” means any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, as a result of which the Participant is receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three (3) months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Trust. The determination of whether the Participant’s physical or mental impairment satisfies the conditions set forth in this Section shall be made under a disability insurance program covering employees of the Trust; provided, however, that if the Participant is determined to be totally disabled by the Social Security Administration, his physical or mental impairment shall be deemed to satisfy the conditions of this Section.

3



2.8      Ending Share Price ” means the average closing price per Common Share for the twenty (20) trading days beginning on the first trading day after the end of the Performance Period on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded (unless a Change in Control occurs during the Performance Period, in which case the term means the value per Common Share determined as of the date of the Change in Control, such value to be determined by the Committee in its reasonable discretion based on the actual or implied price per share paid in the Change in Control transaction).
2.9      Good Reason ” means the occurrence of an event listed in Subsection (a), (b) or (c) below:
(a)      the Trust materially diminishes the Participant’s job responsibilities such that the Participant would no longer have responsibilities substantially equivalent to those of other officers holding an equivalent job position to that held by the Participant before the diminution at companies with similar revenues and market capitalization;

(b)      the Trust reduces the Participant’s annual base salary (except for a reduction that is a uniform percentage of annual base salary for each officer of the Trust and does not exceed ten percent (10%) of annual base salary) or annual bonus opportunity at high, target or threshold performance as a percentage of annual base salary; or

(c)      the Trust requires the Participant to relocate the Participant’s primary place of employment to a new location that is more than fifty (50) miles from its current location (determined using the most direct driving route), without the Participant’s consent;

provided however, as to each event in Subsection (a), (b) or (c),
(i)      the Participant gives written notice to the Trust within thirty (30) days following the event or receipt of notice of the event of his objection to the event;
(ii)      the Trust fails to remedy the event within thirty (30) days following the Participant’s written notice; and
(iii)      the Participant terminates his employment within thirty (30) days following the Trust’s failure to remedy the event.
2.10      Participant ” means a person who participates in the Plan pursuant to Section 3.1.
2.11      Performance Period ” means each three-year performance period commencing on January 1 of a particular year and ending on December 31 of the third year (or, if earlier, the date of a Change in Control). The first Performance Period shall run from January 1, 2014 and end on December 31, 2016; the second Performance Period shall run from January 1, 2015 and end on December 31, 2017; etc.
2.12      Relative Total Shareholder Return ” means Total Shareholder Return ranked on a percentile basis relative to the total shareholder return of companies comprising the peer group of companies for the Performance Period using the same methodology used for calculating Total Shareholder Return. For this purpose, the peer group of companies shall be the group of fifteen

4



(15) companies selected by the Committee in 2014 and disclosed in the Trust’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2014, and if the Committee decides that any company shall cease to be a peer during the Performance Period, it shall be deleted from the peer group, but no new companies shall be added to the peer group during the Performance Period.
2.13      Retire ” means a Participant resigns upon or after reaching (a) age 55 and being employed by the Trust for at least twenty (20) years or (b) age 65.
2.14      Total Shareholder Return ” means (a) the sum of the total change in the Ending Share Price as compared to the Beginning Share Price, plus any dividends paid to a shareholder of record with respect to one Common Share during the Performance Period, expressed as a percentage of (b) the Beginning Share Price.
ARTICLE III. ELIGIBILITY AND ADMINISTRATION

3.1      Eligibility . Officers of the Trust at the level of President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Senior Vice President who are employees of the Trust as of the first day of the applicable Performance Period shall be the initial Participants. The Committee may designate additional employees as Participants during the Performance Period. If the Committee adds Participants after the first day of the Performance Period, the Participant’s Award opportunity will be as established by the Committee by written notice to the Participant in lieu of the level specified in Section 4.1. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee, the Award for any Participant who is not a Participant on the first day of the Performance Period shall be prorated in the proportion that the number of days the Participant is employed by the Trust during the Performance Period bears to the number of days in the Performance Period. Once a person becomes a Participant in the Plan, the Participant shall remain a Participant until any Award payable hereunder has been paid and is vested or forfeited.
 
3.2      Administration . The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have discretionary authority to interpret and make all determinations relating to the Plan. Any interpretation or determination by the Committee shall be binding on all parties.

ARTICLE IV. AWARDS

4.1      Award Opportunity . Each Participant’s total Award under the Plan shall initially be stated as a percentage of the Participant’s annual base salary determined as of the beginning of the applicable Performance Period, which percentage shall depend upon the Participant’s position and the degree of achievement of threshold, target, and high performance goals for the Performance Period as set forth in the table below:

5



 
Threshold
Target
High
 
President and Chief
 
 
 
 
Executive Officer
80%
150%
270%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice
 
 
 
 
President
50%
95%
170%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Vice
 
 
 
 
President
40%
80%
140%
 

4.2      Performance Goals . The performance goals under the Plan are, and are weighted, as follows:

(a)      Absolute Total Shareholder Return (50%); and

(b)      Relative Total Shareholder Return (50%).

The Absolute Total Shareholder Return performance levels shall be as follows:

Threshold: 6%
Target: 8%
High: 10%

If Absolute Total Shareholder Return falls between 6% and 8% or between 8% and 10%, Absolute Total Shareholder Return shall be rounded to the closest percentage in increments of 0.5% (e.g., 8.3% shall be rounded to 8.5%) and the portion of the Award that is dependent upon Absolute Total Shareholder Return shall be determined by linear interpolation.

The Relative Total Shareholder Return performance levels shall be as follows:

Threshold: 33 rd percentile
Target : 51 st percentile
High: 76 th percentile or above

If Relative Total Shareholder Return falls between the 33 rd percentile and the 51 st percentile or between the 51 st percentile and the 76 th percentile, the portion of the Award that is dependent upon Relative Total Shareholder Return shall be determined by linear interpolation.

If the degree of achievement of either performance goal falls below threshold, the portion of the Award that is dependent on that performance goal shall not be paid.

4.3      Eligibility for, Timing and Form of Payment of Award . Except as provided in Sections 4.5 and 4.6, the Participant must be employed by the Trust on the last day of the Performance Period to receive an Award, and the Award shall be issued as follows:


6



(a)      after the end of the Performance Period, the dollar amount earned pursuant to Sections 4.1 and 4.2 shall be determined for each Participant;

(b)      the dollar amount for each Participant determined in subsection (a) shall be converted into a number of Common Shares by dividing the dollar amount by the closing price per share of Common Share on the January 1 following the end of the Performance Period (or if such January 1 is not a trading day, the first trading day following such January 1 on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded); and

(c)      in the year following the Performance Period by no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the Performance Period, seventy-five percent (75%) of the number of Common Shares for each Participant determined in subsection (b) shall be issued in unrestricted (i.e., fully vested) Common Shares and twenty-five percent (25%) of the number of Common Shares for each Participant determined in subsection (b) shall be issued in Common Shares subject to vesting as described in Section 4.4. All such Common Shares shall be awarded under and in accordance with the Trust’s 2007 Omnibus Long Term Incentive Plan.

4.4      Common Shares subject to Vesting . The Common Shares that are subject to vesting as described in Section 4.3(c) (i.e., twenty-five (25%) percent of the aggregate number of Common Shares in Section 4.3) shall vest only (a) if the Participant remains employed by the Trust until the one-year anniversary of the end of the applicable Performance Period, (b) if during the period from the last day of the Performance Period through the one-year anniversary of the end of such Performance Period, the Participant’s employment is terminated by the Trust without Cause, or the Participant resigns for Good Reason, Retires, dies or becomes subject to a Disability while employed by the Trust, or a Change in Control occurs while the Participant is employed by the Trust, or (c) if, and to the extent provided by, Section 4.5 or 4.6.

4.5      Qualifying Termination during the Performance Period . If during the Performance Period, the Participant’s employment is terminated by the Trust without Cause, or the Participant resigns with Good Reason, Retires, dies or becomes subject to a Disability while employed by the Trust, the Participant shall receive an Award calculated based on actual levels of achievement of prorated performance goals as of the date of such event with respect to the portion of the Award that is dependent on the degree of achievement of the Absolute Total Shareholder Return and the portion of the Award that is dependent on the degree of achievement of the Relative Total Shareholder Return performance goals, and for purposes of determining Absolute Total Shareholder Return, Relative Total Shareholder Return, Total Shareholder Return, and Ending Share Price, treating the day of such event as if it were the last day of the Performance Period. In either case, the Award shall be prorated in the proportion that the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the Performance Period through the date the Participant ceases to be an employee of the Trust bears to the total number of days in the Performance Period. In such event, the number of Common Shares shall be calculated based on the closing price per Common Share on the trading date coinciding with (or if that is not a trading day, next following) such event in lieu of the price described in Section 4.3(b), all of the Participant’s Common Shares shall be fully vested, and the Common Shares shall be issued to the Participant within thirty (30) days after such event; provided, however, if a Participant is a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), the

7



issuance shall occur six (6) months after the Participant’s termination of employment (or if earlier and if permitted under Section 409A, the date specified in Section 4.3(c)), except if the Participant dies in which case the issuance shall occur within thirty (30) days after the Participant’s death.

4.6      Change in Control during the Performance Period . If a Change in Control occurs while the Participant is employed by the Trust during the Performance Period, the Participant shall receive an Award calculated and determined in all respects in a similar manner as described in Section 4.5, substituting for this purpose the date of the Change in Control for the date of termination of employment; provided, however, that the Award shall not be prorated as provided in the second sentence of Section 4.5 based on the period of employment during the Performance Period through the date of the Change in Control. In such event, the Common Shares issued to the Participant with respect to such Performance Period shall be fully vested and the number of Common Shares shall be calculated based on the closing price per Common Share on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded on the trading day coinciding with (or if that is not a trading day, immediately preceding) the date of the Change in Control, or if Common Shares are no longer traded on an exchange as of such date, based on the value determined by the Committee in its reasonable discretion based on the actual or implied price paid in the Change in Control transaction. The Award shall be issued on the date of the Change in Control.

4.7      Forfeiture . Except as otherwise provided in this Article, any Award that is not vested as of the earlier of termination of employment or the one-year anniversary of the end of the applicable Performance Period shall be forfeited.

ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS

5.1      Dividends on Unvested Shares . Dividends declared with respect to unvested Common Shares shall be paid currently.

5.2      Tax Withholding . In order to satisfy applicable tax withholding, the Award shall be reduced by that whole number of vested Common Shares which have a value equal to the minimum amount of the required tax obligations imposed on the Trust, and to the extent any remainder of the required tax withholding remains unsatisfied because no fraction of a Common Share is reduced, the Trust shall deduct the remainder from other cash payable to the Participant or if no cash is payable to the Participant, the Trust may require the Participant to remit the remainder.

5.3      Restrictions on Transfer . Except for the transfer by bequest or inheritance, the Participant shall not have the right to make or permit to exist any transfer or hypothecation, whether outright or as security, with or without consideration, voluntary or involuntary, of all or any part of any right, title or interest in or to an Award until such date as, and only to the extent that, vested shares have been issued. Any such disposition not made in accordance with this Plan shall be deemed null and void. Any permitted transferee under this Section shall be bound by the terms of this Plan.

5.4      Change in Capitalization . The number and kind of shares issuable under this Plan shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of the Trust’s 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan.

8




5.5      Successors . This Plan shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns of the parties.

5.6      Notice . Except as otherwise specified herein, all notices and other communications under this Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if personally delivered or if sent by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the proposed recipient at the last known address of the recipient. Any party may designate any other address to which notices shall be sent by giving notice of the address to the other parties in the same manner as provided herein.

5.7      Severability . In the event that any one or more of the provisions or portion thereof contained in this Plan shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the same shall not invalidate or otherwise affect any other provisions of this Plan, and this Plan shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision or portion thereof had never been contained herein.

5.8      No Right to Continued Retention . Neither the establishment of the Plan nor the Award hereunder shall be construed as giving any Participant the right to continued service with the Trust.

5.9      Interpretation and IRC Section 409A . Section headings used herein are for convenience of reference only and shall not be considered in construing this Plan. Sections 1.1 through 1.3 are intended to introduce and summarize the Plan only and shall not apply for purposes of determining a Participant’s rights under the Plan. Termination of employment under the Plan shall be considered to have occurred for purposes of Sections 4.4 and 4.5 only if the Participant has a termination of employment that constitutes a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan is intended to comply with Section 409A, and the Plan shall be interpreted in manner consistent with such intent.

5.10      Amendment and Termination of the Plan . The Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, provided that no amendment shall deprive a Participant of any Award that is earned up to the date of the amendment or termination or result in the acceleration of any award payable under the Plan if such acceleration would result in any Participants incurring a tax under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

5.11      Governing Laws . The laws of the State of Maryland shall govern the Plan, to the extent not preempted by federal law, without reference to the principles of conflict of laws; provided, however, no Common Shares shall be issued except, in the reasonable judgment of the Committee, in compliance with exemptions under applicable securities laws.

5.12      Transition Arrangements . As a result of the change to a “rolling” structure contemplated by the Plan in comparison to the operation of the Prior Plan, the Plan shall also have the following transition program in order to ensure that Participants maintain an appropriate level of overall long-term compensation during the “phasing in” period for the Plan. The transition program will be as follows:


9



(a)      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, there shall be an additional one-time transition Award (in the amounts with respect to each Participant as described in Section 4.1 and with the performance goals as described in Section 4.2) commencing in 2014 (the “One-time Transition Award”). The One-time Transition Award will be divided into two separate tranches, each having different performance periods and vesting schedules, as follows: (i) 33.34% of the One-time Transition Award will have a performance period of one year (rather than the normal three years set forth under the Plan) commencing on January 1, 2014 and will vest 50% if the Participant remains employed by the Trust until the one-year anniversary of the end of such one-year performance period and 50% if the Participant remains employed by the Trust until the two-year anniversary of the end of such one-year performance period, and (ii) 66.66% of the One-time Transition Award will have a performance period of two years (rather than the normal three years set forth under the Plan) commencing on January 1, 2014 and will vest 65% if the Participant remains employed by the Trust until the end of such two-year performance period and 35% if the Participant remains employed by the Trust until the one-year anniversary of the end of such two-year performance period. For purposes of this Subsection, all definitions that employ the term “Performance Period” (such as the definitions of “Ending Share Price” and “Total Shareholder Return”) shall be deemed instead to employ the applicable performance period described in this Subsection.

(b)      Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (a), the One-Time Transition Award described therein shall remain subject to the provisions of Sections 4.4(b)(to the extent it provides for earlier vesting than Subsection (a) or (b)), 4.5 and 4.6 (but Sections 4.3(c) and 4.4(a) shall not apply to such One-Time Transition Award).

 
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Title:
Executive Vice President - Accounting and Administration
 
 
 
 
 


10


Exhibit 10.51
AMENDMENT TO
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(Effective January 1, 2014)
The Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”) is hereby amended as follows:
The phrase “(or if such January 1 is not a trading day, the first trading day preceding such January 1)” in Section 4.3(c) of the Plan is hereby replaced with the following phrase: “(or if such January 1 is not a trading day, the first trading day after such January 1)”
This amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2014.

 
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Vice President - Accounting and Administration
 
 
 
 
 
 
July 31, 2014
 

                    




Exhibit 12
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
Computation of Ratios
(In thousands)

Earnings to fixed charges ratio:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
1,368

 
$
1,538

 
$
(897
)
 
$
2,395

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Fixed charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Interest expense
14,985

 
15,824

 
29,515

 
32,014

       Capitalized interest
461

 
190

 
854

 
483

 
15,446

 
16,014

 
30,369

 
32,497

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Capitalized interest
(461
)
 
(190
)
 
(854
)
 
(483
)
       Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
7

 

 
7

 

Adjusted earnings
16,360

 
17,362

 
28,625

 
34,409

Fixed charges (from above)
$
15,446

 
$
16,014

 
$
30,369

 
$
32,497

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
1.06

 
1.08

 
0.94

 
1.06

(1) Due to Washington REIT's loss from continuing operations during the 2014 Period, the earnings to fixed charges ratio was less than 1:1. Washington REIT must generate additional earnings of $1.7 million in the 2014 Period to achieve a ratio of 1:1.

Debt service coverage ratio:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net income attributable to the controlling interests
$
1,087

 
$
5,263

 
105,641

 
$
12,598

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Interest expense (1)
14,985

 
16,152

 
29,515

 
32,670

       Real estate depreciation and amortization (1)
24,401

 
25,582

 
47,154

 
51,106

       Income tax expense
71

 
24

 
71

 
24

       Non-real estate depreciation
180

 
215

 
373

 
411

 
39,637

 
41,973

 
77,113

 
84,211

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Gain on sale of real estate (1)
(282
)
 

 
(106,555
)
 
(3,195
)
Adjusted EBITDA
40,442

 
47,236

 
76,199

 
93,614

Debt service
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Interest expense
14,985

 
16,152

 
29,515

 
32,670

       Principal amortization
965

 
811

 
1,795

 
1,643

 
$
15,950

 
$
16,963

 
$
31,310

 
$
34,313

Debt service coverage ratio
2.54

 
2.78

 
2.43

 
2.73

(1) Includes discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Paul T. McDermott, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ Paul T. McDermott
 
 
 
Paul T. McDermott
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer






Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Laura M. Franklin, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
Executive Vice President
 
 
 
Accounting and Administration
 
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)





Exhibit 31.3
CERTIFICATION
I, William T. Camp, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ William T. Camp
 
 
 
William T. Camp
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)





Exhibit 32
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Vice President Accounting, Administration and Corporate Secretary, and the Chief Financial Officer of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”), each hereby certifies on the date hereof, that:
(a)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Washington REIT.

DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ Paul T. McDermott
 
 
 
Paul T. McDermott
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
Laura M. Franklin
 
 
 
Executive Vice President
 
 
 
Accounting and Administration
 
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
DATE:
August 5, 2014
 
/s/ William T. Camp
 
 
 
William T. Camp
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)