UNITED STATES

SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 10-Q



QUARTERLY  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR  15(d)
OF  THE  SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934



For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016



Commission File Number: 1-9700



THE  CHARLES  SCHWAB  CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





211 Main Street, San Francisco, CA  94105

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)



Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (415) 667-7000



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ⌧   No  ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes   ⌧     No   ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b- 2 of the Exchange Act.





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b- 2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes   ☐ No   ⌧



Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



  1,323,003,955   shares of $.01 par value Common Stock

Outstanding on July 27, 2016





 

---

 











 

---

 

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)



INTRODUCTION



The Charles Schwab Corporation (CSC) is a savings and loan holding company engaged, through its subsidiaries, in wealth management, securities brokerage, banking, money management, custody, and financial advisory services. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab) is a securities broker-dealer with over 330   domestic branch offices in   46 states, as well as a branch in each of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and London, England. In addition, Schwab serves clients in Hong Kong through one of CSC’s subsidiaries. Other subsidiaries include Charles Schwab Bank (Schwab Bank), a federal savings bank, and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM), the investment advisor for Schwab’s proprietary mutual funds, which are referred to as the Schwab Funds ® , and for Schwab’s exchange-traded funds (ETFs) , which are referred to as the Schwab ETFs™.



CSC and its subsidiaries (collectively , referred to as the Company) operate through two reportable segments – Investor Services and Advisor Services. The Investor Services segment provides retail brokerage and banking services, retirement plan services, and other corporate brokerage services. The Advisor Services segment provides custodial, trading, and support services as well as retirement business services.



This quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.





Forward-Looking Statements



In addition to historical information, t his Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may,” “estimate,” “appear,” “aim,” “target,” “could,” “would,” “continue,” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements.



These forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s beliefs, objectives, and expectations as of the date hereof, are necessarily estimates based on the best judgment of the Company’s senior management. These statements relate to, among other things:



·

the impact of current market conditions and interest rates on the Company’s results of operations (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview” and “– Results of Operations – Net Interest Revenue”);

·

management’s ability to adjust spending plans to maintain the balance between profitability and investing for growth (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview”);

·

the expected impact of the final Department of Labor fiduciary rule , the final Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessment rule, and the proposed rule relating to a regulatory capital deduction for investments in unsecured debt issued by global systemically important banking organizations (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Current Regulatory Environment and Other Developments”);

·

sources of liquidity, capital, and level of dividends (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity”);

·

the timing of bulk transfers (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity”);

·

target capital ratios (see “Part I, Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Management – Regulatory Capital Requirements”);

-   1  -

---

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 

·

the likelihood of indemnification and guarantee payment obligations (see “Part I, Item 1. – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – Notes – 8. Commitments and Contingencies – Guarantees and indemnifications”); and

·

the impact of legal proceedings and regulatory matters (see “Part I, Item 1. – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – Notes – 8. Commitments and Contingencies – Legal contingencies” and “Part II, Item 1. – Legal Proceedings”).



Achievement of the expressed beliefs, objectives, and expectations described in these statements is subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expressed beliefs, objectives, and expectations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q or, in the case of documents incorporated by reference, as of the date of those documents.



Important factors that may cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to:

·

changes in general economic and financial market conditions;

·

changes in revenues and profit margin due to changes in interest rates;

·

the level of interest rates, including yields available on money market mutual fund eligible instruments;

·

the Company’s ability to attract and retain clients and registered investment advisors and grow those relationships and client assets;

·

client use of the Company’s investment advisory services and other products and services;

·

the Company’s ability to develop and launch new products, services and capabilities in a timely and successful manner;

·

fluctuations in client asset values due to changes in equity valuations;

·

the performance or valuation of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity;

·

trading activity;

·

competitive pressures on rates and fees;

·

the Company’s ability to manage expenses;

·

the timing and impact of changes in the Company’s level of investments in land, leasehold improvements, information technology equipment and software;

·

the clarification and interpretation of certain provisions in the final Department of Labor rule concerning fiduciary standards;

·

the timing of when the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund reserve ratio reaches a set threshold of insured deposits;

·

the adverse impact of financial reform legislation and related regulations;

·

the level of client assets, including cash balances;

·

the amount of loans to the Company’s brokerage and banking clients;

·

the level of the Company’s stock repurchase activity;

·

the availability and terms of external financing;

·

capital needs and management;

·

client sensitivity to interest rates;

·

timing, amount and impact of the migration of certain balances from brokerage accounts and sweep money market funds into Schwab Bank;

·

regulatory guidance;

·

potential breaches of contractual terms for which the Company has indemnification or guarantee obligations;

·

the effect of adverse developments in litigation or regulatory matters and the extent of any related charges; and

·

amounts recovered on insurance policies.



Certain of these factors, as well as general risk factors affecting the Company, are discussed in greater detail in “Part I –Item 1A – Risk Factors” in the Com pany’s Annual Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 2015 , and “Part II – Other Information – Item 1A – Risk Factors. ”



 

---

 

G LOSSARY OF TERMS



Active brokerage accounts: Brokerage accounts with activity within the preceding eight months.



Asset-backed securities: Debt securities backed by financial assets such as loans or receivables.



Assets receiving ongoing advisory services: Client relationships under the guidance of independent advisors and assets enrolled in one of the Company’s retail or other advisory solutions.



Average client assets: The daily average client asset balance for the period.



Basel III: Global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.



Basis point: One basis point equals 1/100th of 1%, or 0.01%.



Cash and investments segregated and on deposit for regulatory purposes: Client cash or qualified securities balances not used for margin lending are segregated into investment accounts maintained for the exclusive benefit of clients, pursuant to Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, by the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries.



Client assets: The market value of all client assets custodied at the Company, which includes both cash and securities , at a point in time .  



Client cash as a percentage of client assets: Calculated as money market fund balances, bank deposits, Schwab One ® balances, and certain cash equivalents as a percentage of client assets.



Clients’ daily average trades: Includes daily average revenue trades by clients, trades by clients in asset-based pricing relationships, and all commission-free trades.



Commitments to extend credit: Legally binding agreements to extend credit for unused home equity loans and lines of credit (HELOCs), Pledged Asset Lines ® (PALs) and other lines of credit.



Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital: The sum of common stock and related surplus net of treasury stock, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and qualifying minority interests, less applicable regulatory adjustments and deductions.



Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio: The ratio of CET1 Capital to total risk-weighted assets.



Concentration risk: The potential for loss resulting from holding large positions in financial instruments collateralized by assets with similar economic characteristics or in securities of a single issuer or particular industry or geographical area.



Core net new client assets: Net new client assets before significant one-time inflows or outflows, such as acquisitions/divestitures or extraordinary (generally, greater than $10 billion) mutual fund clearing transfers.



Credit risk: The potential for loss due to a borrower, counterparty, or issuer failing to perform its contractual obligations.



Customer Protection Rule: Refers to Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Daily average revenue trades: Total revenue trades during a certain period, divided by the number of trading days in that period. Revenue trades include all client trades that generate trading revenue (i.e., commission revenue or principal transaction revenue).



Debt to total capital ratio: Calculated as long-term debt divided by stockholders’ equity and long-term debt.



---

 

Delinquency roll rates: The rates at which loans transition through delinquency stages, ultimately resulting in a loss. The Company considers a loan to be delinquent if it is 30 days or more past due.



Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank): Regulatory reform legislation signed into federal law in 2010 containing numerous provisions which expanded prudential regulation of large financial services companies.



Final Regulatory Capital Rules: Refers to the regulatory capital rules issued by U.S. banking agencies in July 2013 that implemented Basel III and relevant provisions of Dodd-Frank, which apply to savings and loan holding companies, as well as federal savings banks. Implementation began on January 1, 2015.



First Mortgages: Refers to first lien residential real estate mortgage loans, which include two loan classes: first mortgages and purchased first mortgages.



Full-time equivalent employees: Represents the total number of hours worked divided by a 40-hour work week for the following categories: full-time, part-time, and temporary employees and persons employed on a contract basis.



Interest rate risk: The potential for variability in net interest revenue or the fluctuation in the valuation of assets arising from changes in interest rates.



Interest-bearing liabilities: Includes bank deposits, payables to brokerage clients, short-term borrowings, and long-term debt on which the Company pays interest.



Interest-earning assets: Includes cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated, broker-related receivables, receivables from brokerage clients, securities available for sale, securities held to maturity, and bank loans on which the Company earns interest .



Investment grade: Defined as a rating equivalent to a Moody’s Investors Service ( Moody’s ) rating of “Baa” or higher, or a Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group ( Standard & Poor’s ) or Fitch Ratings, Ltd ( Fitch ) rating of “BBB-” or higher.



Liquidity risk:   The potential that the Company will be unable to sell assets or meet cash flow obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses.



Loan-to-value ratio:   C alculated as the principal amount of a loan divided by the value of the collateral securing the loan.



Margin loans:   Advances made to brokerage clients on a secured basis to purchase securities reflected in receivables from brokerage clients on the Company’s balance sheets.



Market risk: The potential for changes in earnings or the value of financial instruments held by the Company as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, equity prices or market conditions.



Master netting arrangement: An agreement between two counterparties that have multiple contracts with each other that provides for net settlement of all contracts through a single cash payment in the event of default or termination of any one contract.



Mortgage-backed securit y : A type of asset-backed security that is secured by a mortgage or group of mortgages.



Net interest margin: Net interest revenue divided by average interest-earning assets.



Net new client assets: Total inflows of client cash and securities to the Company less client outflows.



New brokerage accounts: All brokerage accounts opened during the period, as well as any accounts added via acquisition.



Nonperforming assets: The total of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned.



---

 

Operational risk: Potential for loss due to inadequate or failed internal processes, systems, and firms or exchanges handling client orders, or loss from external events and relationships impacting the Company and/or any of its key business partners and vendors.



Order flow revenue: Net compensation received from markets and firms to which Schwab and optionsXpress, Inc. send equity and options orders. Reflects rebates received for certain types of order s, minus fees paid for types of orders for which exchange fees or other charges apply.



Pledged Asset Line: A non-purpose revolving line of credit from Schwab Bank secured by eligible assets held in a separate pledged asset account maintained at Schwab.



Return on average common stockholders’ equity: Calculated as net income available to common stockholders annualized divided by average common stockholders’ equity.



Risk-weighted assets: Primarily computed by assigning specific risk-weightings as specified by the regulators to assets and off-balance sheet instruments for capital adequacy calculations.



Tier 1 Capital: The sum of CET1 Capital and additional Tier 1 Capital instruments and related surplus, less applicable adjustments and deductions.



Tier 1 Leverage Ratio: Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average total consolidated assets at the end of the quarter.



Trading days: Days in which the markets/exchanges are open for the buying and selling of securities. Early market closures are counted as half-days.



U.S. federal banking agencies: Refers to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) , the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) , the FDIC , and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) .



Uniform Net Capital Rule: Refers to Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which specifies minimum capital requirements that are intended to ensure the general financial soundness and liquidity of broker-dealers.









 

---

 

OVERVIEW



Management of the Company focuses on several key client activity and financial metrics in evaluating the Company’s financial position and operating performance. Management believes that net revenue growth, pre-tax profit margin, earnings per common share (EPS), and return on average common stockholders’ equity provide broad indicators of the Company’s overall financial health, operating efficiency, and ability to generate acceptable returns. Expenses excluding interest as a percentage of average client assets are considered by management to be a measure of operating efficiency. Results for the second quarters and first halves of 2016 and 2015 are:







During the second quarter of 2016, the Company continued to grow, steadily building clients and assets with a combination of financial products, service and value. The number of accounts enrolled in one of our retail advisory solutions reached 581,000, up 8%, through June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. At June 30, 2016, there were 10.0 million active brokerage accounts, 1.1 million banking accounts and 1.6 million retirement plan participants, up 4%, 6%, and 5%, respectively, from the same period in 2015.



Core net new assets were $26.6 billion and $58.6 billion, respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2016, continuing a pattern of solid organic asset growth. Total client assets ended the second quarter of 2016 at $2.62 trillion, up 3% from the second quarter of 2015.



---

 

Net revenues increased by 17% and 16% in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015, respectively, primarily due to a combination of sustained success in growing our client base and the effects of the Federal Reserve’s initial rate increase in December 2015.



On the expense side, spending increased 11% and 9% in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015, respectively, in keeping with expectations of reinvesting a portion of improved revenues to support growth. This approach yielded a spread of 580 basis points between the pace of growth in net revenue and expense growth during the second quarter of 2016.



The pre-tax profit margin for the second quarter and first half of 2016 was 39.4% and 38.3%, respectively, compared to 36.2% and 34.0% for the same periods in 2015. Net income grew by 28% and 32%, respectively, for the second quarter and first half 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015.



At the end of the second quarter of 2016, market concerns regarding economic growth, interest rates and equity valuations escalated. While many of the concerns have abated somewhat, the Company recognizes the importance of remaining flexible in order to make the most of the environment as it evolves. The Company’s management is experienced in monitoring conditions and adjusting spending plans as necessary to maintain a balance between near-term profitability and investing for long-term growth.



Current Regulatory Environment and O ther Developments



In May 2016, the Federal Reserve , the OCC and the FDIC jointly issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would impose a minimum net stable funding ratio (NSFR) on certain banking organizations, including CSC. The NSFR is intended to measure an organization’s “available” amount of stable funding relative to its “required” amount of stable funding over a one-year time horizon. The effective date of the rule would be January 1, 2018. The comment period for the proposed rule ends on August 5 , 2016 and the impact to the Company cannot be assessed until the final rule is released.



In April 2016, the Department of Labor published a final rule that significantly broadens the definition of “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Among other things, the new rule subjects broker-dealers who provide non-discretionary investment advice to retirement plans and accounts to a “best interest” standard, as well as other conditions and requirements. Based on the Company’s   evaluation of the final rule to date, the Company does not expect the rule to have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.



In March 2016, the FDIC issued a final rule that will impose a surcharge on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more in order to increase the reserve ratio of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) . Based on expected reductions in the C ompany’s regular FDIC insurance assessments combined with the surcharge, the Company anticipates that its overall FDIC assessment, relative to its regular assessment base, will increase by a net of approximately 2 to 2.5 basis points annually, beginning in the third quarter of 2016 and likely running through the end of 2018.



I n December 2015, the OCC issued proposed guidelines to establish standards for recovery planning by national banks and federal savings banks with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more. The proposed guidelines would require each bank to develop and maintain a recovery plan that sets forth the bank’s plan for how it will remain a going concern when it is experiencing considerable financial or operational stress. The comment period for the proposed guidelines ended on February 16, 2016 and the guidelines are subject to further modification. The Company will continue to evaluat e the impact of the proposed guidelines.



In October 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would require certain financial institutions that are subject to the Federal Reserve’s capital rules to apply a regulatory capital deduction treatment to their investments in unsecured debt issued by U.S. bank holding companies identified as global systemically important banking organizations. The comment period for the rule proposal ended on February 19, 2016 and the rule proposal is subject to further modification. The proposed effective date of the rule would be January 1, 2019. The Company continues to monitor developments in order to assess the impact of the proposed rule, but does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.





---

 



Results of Operations



The following discussion presents an analysis of the Company’s results of operations for the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015.



Net Revenues




Three Months Ended June 30,					2016						2015
								% of						% of
		Percent						Total Net						Total Net
		Change			Amount			Revenues			Amount			Revenues
Asset management and administration fees
Mutual funds and ETF service fees (1)		23	%		$	461		25	%		$	375		24	%
Advice solutions		(1)	%			226		12	%			228		15	%
Other (1)		4	%			70		4	%			67		4	%
Asset management and administration fees		13	%			757		41	%			670		43	%
Net interest revenue
Interest revenue		30	%			840		46	%			645		41	%
Interest expense		27	%			(42)		(2)	%			(33)		(2)	%
Net interest revenue		30	%			798		44	%			612		39	%
Trading revenue
Commissions		(1)	%			190		10	%			191		12	%
Principal transactions		(8)	%			11		1	%			12		1	%
Trading revenue		(1)	%			201		11	%			203		13	%
Other		(11)	%			70		4	%			79		5	%
Provision for loan losses		-				2		-				2		-
Total net revenues		17	%		$	1,828		100	%		$	1,566		100	%






Six Months Ended June 30,					2016						2015
								% of						% of
		Percent						Total Net						Total Net
		Change			Amount			Revenues			Amount			Revenues
Asset management and administration fees
Mutual funds and ETF service fees (1)		20	%		$	876		24	%		$	733		24	%
Advice solutions		(2)	%			441		12	%			448		14	%
Other (1)		5	%			139		4	%			133		4	%
Asset management and administration fees		11	%			1,456		40	%			1,314		42	%
Net interest revenue
Interest revenue		31	%			1,650		46	%			1,262		41	%
Interest expense		29	%			(80)		(2)	%			(62)		(2)	%
Net interest revenue		31	%			1,570		44	%			1,200		39	%
Trading revenue
Commissions		(1)	%			405		11	%			409		13	%
Principal transactions		33	%			28		1	%			21		1	%
Trading revenue		1	%			433		12	%			430		14	%
Other		(6)	%			133		4	%			142		5	%
Provision for loan losses		(100)	%			-		-				6		-
Total net revenues		16	%		$	3,592		100	%		$	3,092		100	%




(1)	Other third-party mutual funds have been reclassified to Mutual f unds and ETFs. Related revenues have been reclassified from Other asset management and administration fees. Prior period information has been recast to reflect this change.



-   8  -

---

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 



Asset Management and Administration Fees



Asset management and administration fees include mutual fund and ETF service fees and fees for other asset-based financial services provided to individual and institutional clients. The Company earns mutual fund and ETF service fees for shareholder services, administration, and investment management provided to its proprietary funds, and recordkeeping and shareholder services provided to third-party funds. These fees are based upon the daily balances of client assets invested in these funds.



The Company also earns asset management fees for advice solutions, which include managed portfolios, specialized strategies and customized investment advice .  



The fair values of client assets included in proprietary and third-party mutual funds and ETFs are based on quoted market prices and other observable market data.



Other asset management and administration fees include various asset-based fees, such as trust fees,   401(k) recordkeeping fees, mutual fund clearing fees, collective trust fund fees, and non-balance based service and transaction fees.



Asset management and administration fees vary with changes in the balances of client assets due to market fluctuations and client activity. For a discussion of the impact of current market conditions on asset management and administration fees, see “Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”



The following table s present a roll forward of client assets for the Schwab money market funds, Schwab equity and bond funds and ETFs , and Mutual Fund OneSource ® :




		Schwab Money						Schwab Equity and						Mutual Fund
		Market Funds						Bond Funds and ETFs						OneSource ®
Three Months Ended June 30,		2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	167,427		$	162,473		$	104,953		$	95,161		$	203,759		$	237,317
Net inflows (outflows)		(6,495)			(6,906)			3,572			3,498			(4,437)			(6,282)
Net market gains (losses) and other		19			10			2,197			(260)			4,030			212
Balance at end of period	$	160,951		$	155,577		$	110,722		$	98,399		$	203,352		$	231,247






		Schwab Money						Schwab Equity and						Mutual Fund
		Market Funds						Bond Funds and ETFs						OneSource ®
Six Months Ended June 30,		2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	166,148		$	167,909		$	102,112		$	88,450		$	207,654		$	234,381
Net inflows (outflows)		(5,243)			(12,506)			5,654			8,296			(9,179)			(8,875)
Net market gains (losses) and other		46			174			2,956			1,653			4,877			5,741
Balance at end of period	$	160,951		$	155,577		$	110,722		$	98,399		$	203,352		$	231,247



---

 

The following table s present asset management and administration fees, average clie nt assets, and average fee yields :









Note: C ertain changes have been made to the above categorizations. Prior period information has been recast to reflect these changes .



Asset management and administration fees increased by $ 87  million, or 13%, and $142 million, or 11 % , in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015. The increase in mutual fund and ETF service fees is primarily due to higher net yields on money market fund assets, partially offset by a reduction in average client assets in Mutual Fund OneSource .



---

 

Net Interest Revenue



Net interest revenue is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on funding sources. The Company’s interest-earning assets are primarily funded through bank deposits and brokerage client account balances.



Interest-earning assets primarily include cash and cash equivalents, segregated cash and investments, margin loans included in receivables from brokerage clients, investment securities and bank loans on which the Company earns interest . Revenue on interest-earning assets is affected by various factors such as the distribution and composition of assets, prevailing interest rates when purchased, and changes in prepayment levels. Fees earned on securities borrowed and loaned are included in other interest revenue and expense. The rates on the majority of the Company’s investment securities and loans re-price or reset based on short-term interest rates and the remainder is invested in fixed-rate loans and securities.



The Company’s interest-bearing liabilities include bank deposits, payables to brokerage clients , short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Interest-bearing liabilities are primarily sensitive to short-term interest rates and the Company establishes the rates paid on most of these liabilities. The Company expects that the rate paid on these liabilities will generally adjust at some fraction of the movement in short-term interest rates.



The Company expects that net interest revenue will increase as short-term interest rates increase and decline should rates fall below current levels. When interest rates fall, the Company may attempt to mitigate some of this negative impact by lowering rates paid to clients on interest-bearing liabilities. The current low interest rate environment limits the extent to which the Company can reduce interest expense on funding sources. The Company may also alter the amount and type of fixed rate loans and securities that are added to the portfolio. Generally, modest increases in the percentage of fixed-rate assets will reduce the rate at which net interest revenue changes if rates move.



Non-interest bearing funding sources include non-interest bearing cash balances, stockholders’ equity and other miscellaneous assets and liabilities.



---

 

The following tables present net interest revenue information corresponding to interest-earning assets and funding sources on the condensed consolidated balance sheets:











---

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 


Six Months Ended June 30,		2016									2015
					Interest			Average						Interest			Average
		Average			Revenue/			Yield/			Average			Revenue/			Yield/
		Balance			Expense			Rate			Balance			Expense			Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	10,820		$	27		0.50	%		$	8,959		$	11		0.25	%
Cash and investments segregated			19,710			41		0.42	%			18,884			13		0.14	%
Broker-related receivables  (1)			535			-		0.15	%			271			-		0.06	%
Receivables from brokerage clients			14,959			249		3.35	%			14,763			244		3.33	%
Securities available for sale  (2)			69,797			409		1.18	%			59,315			295		1.00	%
Securities held to maturity			51,830			657		2.55	%			35,673			445		2.52	%
Bank loans			14,487			197		2.73	%			13,701			181		2.66	%
Total interest-earning assets			182,138			1,580		1.74	%			151,566			1,189		1.58	%
Other interest revenue						70									73
Total interest-earning assets		$	182,138		$	1,650		1.82	%		$	151,566		$	1,262		1.68	%
Funding sources:
Bank deposits		$	133,814		$	16		0.02	%		$	108,008		$	14		0.03	%
Payables to brokerage clients			26,015			1		0.01	%			25,602			1		0.01	%
Short-term borrowings (1,4)			1,029			2		0.39	%			16			-		0.15	%
Long-term debt (5)			2,877			52		3.63	%			2,517			43		3.45	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities (5)			163,735			71		0.09	%			136,143			58		0.09	%
Non-interest-bearing funding sources (4)			18,403									15,423
Other interest expense  (3)						9									4
Total funding sources		$	182,138		$	80		0.09	%		$	151,566		$	62		0.08	%
Net interest revenue					$	1,570		1.73	%					$	1,200		1.60	%




(1)	Interest revenue or expense was less than $500,000 in the period or periods presented.
(2)	Amounts have been calculated based on amortized cost.
(3)	Includes the impact of capitalizing interest on building construction and software development.
(4)	Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation.
(5)	Adjusted for the retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-03. See “ Item 1 – Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – 2. New Accounting Standards” for additional information.



Net interest revenue increased $ 186  million , or 30 % ,   and $370 million, or 31% in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015 , primarily due to higher average balan ces of held to maturity and available for sale securities , and higher average interest rates on securities available for sale and cash and investments segregated . The growth in average balances in bank deposits resulted from an incr ease in amounts swept to Schwab Bank of uninvested cash balances in certain client brokerage accounts . Starting in June 2016, the Schwab Bank sweep feature became the default investment option for uninvested cash balances within all new brokerage accounts. 



T rading Revenue



Trading revenue includes commission and principal transaction revenues. Commission revenue is affected by the number of revenue trades executed and the average revenue earned per revenue trade. Principal transaction revenue is primarily comprised of revenue from trading activity in fixed income securities with clients . To accommodate clients’ fixed income trading activity, the Company maintains positions in fixed income securities, including U.S. state and municipal debt obligations, U.S. Government and corporate debt, and other securities. The difference between the price at which the Company buys and sells securities to and from its clients and other broker-dealers is recognized as principal transaction revenue. Principal transaction revenue also includes adjustments to the fair value of these securities positions .  









-   13  -

---

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 

The following table presents trading revenue and the related drivers:




		Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
		June 30,							Percent			June 30,							Percent
		2016				2015			Change			2016				2015			Change
Daily average revenue trades (in thousands)			279				267		4	%			303				290		4	%
Clients’ daily average trades (in thousands)			518				494		5	%			566				537		5	%
Number of trading days			64.0				63.0		2	%			125.0				124.0		1	%
Average revenue per revenue trade		$	11.27			$	11.97		(6)	%		$	11.36			$	11.97		(5)	%
Trading revenue		$	201			$	203		(1)	%		$	433			$	430		1	%





Other Revenue



Other revenue includes order flow revenue, nonrecurring gains, software fees from the Company’s portfolio management services, exchange processing fees, and other service fees.  



Other revenue decreased by $9 million, or 11%, and $9 million, or 6%, in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015, respectively, primarily due to higher litigation proceeds in the second quarter of 2015 relating to the Company’s non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio, partially offset by higher gains on sales of securities available for sale. 



Order flow revenue was $25 million and $52 million during the second quarters and first halves of both 2016 and 2015, respectively.



Expenses Excluding Interest



The following table shows a comparison of expenses excluding interest:




		Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
		June 30,							Percent			June 30,							Percent
		2016				2015			Change			2016				2015			Change
Compensation and benefits		$	602			$	540		11	%		$	1,228			$	1,121		10	%
Professional services			125				112		12	%			241				226		7	%
Occupancy and equipment			101				85		19	%			199				168		18	%
Advertising and market development			70				62		13	%			140				131		7	%
Communications			62				59		5	%			122				117		4	%
Depreciation and amortization			57				55		4	%			113				109		4	%
Other			91				86		6	%			174				169		3	%
Total expenses excluding interest		$	1,108			$	999		11	%		$	2,217			$	2,041		9	%
Expenses as a percentage of total net revenues:
Compensation and benefits			33	%			34	%					34	%			36	%
Advertising and market development			4	%			4	%					4	%			4	%







Compensation and Benefits



Compensation and benefits expense includes salaries and wages, incentive compensation, and related employee benefits. Incentive compensation includes variable compensation, discretionary bonuses, and stock-based compensation. Variable compensation includes payments to certain individuals based on their sales performance. Discretionary bonuses are based on the Company’s overall performance as measured by EPS. Stock-based compensation primarily includes employee and board of director stock options and restricted stock.



-   14  -

---

 

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Ratios, or as Noted)

 

 

The following table shows a comparison of certain compensation and benefits components and employee data:




		Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
		June 30,							Percent			June 30,							Percent
		2016				2015			Change			2016				2015			Change
Salaries and wages		$	339			$	313		8	%		$	675			$	630		7	%
Incentive compensation			166				144		15	%			339				301		13	%
Employee benefits and other			97				83		17	%			214				190		13	%
Total compensation and benefits expense		$	602			$	540		11	%		$	1,228			$	1,121		10	%
Full-time equivalent employees (in thousands)
At quarter end			16.1				15.0		7	%
Average			15.9				15.0		6	%			15.7				14.9		5	%



Salaries and wages increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015 primarily due to higher employee headcou nt to support the growth in the business and annual salary increases.



Incentive compensation increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015 primarily due to higher discretionary bonus expenses , long-term incentive plan costs, and field incentive plan costs relating to increased net client asset flows. The increase in incentive compensation in the first half of 2016 was also due to higher stock compensation expense.



Employee benefits and other expenses increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015 due to increases in healthcare costs and higher employee headcount .



Expenses Excluding Compensation and Benefits



Professional services expense increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015, primarily due to higher spending on technology services and an increase in fees paid to outsourced service providers and consultants as the Company continued to invest in the business.



Occupancy and equipment expense increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015, primarily due to an increase in software maintenance expense relating to the Company’s information technology systems and increases in property taxes and rent attributable to the changes in the Company’s geographic footprint .



Advertising and market development expense increased in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015, primarily due to an increase in media advertising.



T axes on Income



The Company’s effective income tax rate on income before taxes was 37.2% and 37.7 % for the second quarters and first halves of 2016 and 2015, respectivel y. The effective income tax rate decrease s in the second quarter and first half of 2016 from the same periods in the prior year were primarily due to increases in tax exempt income from U.S. state and municipal securities.





Segment Information



The Company provides financial services to individuals and institutional clients through two segments – Investor Services and Advisor Services. The Investor Services segment provides retail brokerage and banking services, retirement plan services, and other corporate brokerage services. The Advisor Services segment provides custodial, trading, and support services as well as retirement business services .   Revenues and expenses are allocated to the Company’s two segments based on which segment services the client. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments on a pre-tax basis, excluding items such as restructuring and other charges. Segment assets and liabilities are not used for evaluating segment performance or in deciding how to allocate resources to segments.



---

 

Financial information for the Company’s reportable segments is presented in the following tables:















Investor Services

Net revenues increased by $ 143  million, or 12 %, and $264 million, or 11%, in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015 primarily due to increases in net interest revenue and asset management and administration fees. Net interest revenue increased primarily due to higher balances of interest-earning assets, and higher interest rates on securities available for sale and cash and investments segregated .   Asset management and administration fees increased primarily due to higher net yields on money market fund assets, partially offset by a reduction in client assets in Mutual Fund OneSource ® .



Expenses excluding interest increased by $ 74  million, or 10% ,   and $125 million, or 8%, in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015, primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits and occupancy and equipment expenses. Compensation and benefits expenses are higher as a result of higher headcount in client-facing positions and higher incentive compensation associated with growth in net client asset flows.



---

 

A dvisor Services

Net revenues increased by $ 119  million, or 31% ,   and $236 million, or 31%, in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015 primarily due to increases in net interest revenue, asset management and administration fees and trading revenue. Net interest revenue increased primarily due to higher balances of interest-earning assets . This growth was bolstered by the decision to migrate more uninvested client cash balances in the segment to the Schwab Bank sweep feature. Net interest revenue also improved due to higher interest rates on securities available for sale and cash and investments segregated. Asset management and administration fees increased primarily due to higher net yields on money market fund assets. Trading revenue increased due to higher daily average revenue trades, partially offset by lower commissions per revenue trade.



Expenses excluding interest increased by $ 35  million, or 15% ,   and $51 million, or 10%, in the second quarter and first half of 2016 compared to the same period s in 2015, primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits and occupancy and equipment expenses .





Risk Management



The Company’s business activities expose it to a variety of risks, including operational, credit, market, liquidity, compliance and legal risk. The Company has a comprehensive risk management program to identify and manage these risks and their associated potential for financial and reputational impact. Despite the Company’s efforts to identify areas of risk and implement risk management policies and procedures, there can be no assurance that the Company will not suffer unexpected losses due to these risks.



For a discussion on risks that the Company faces and the Company’s process of risk identification and assessment, risk measurement, risk monitoring and reporting and risk mitigation, see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For updated information on the Company’s credit risk and concentration risk exposures, see below. See “Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for additional information relating to market risk.



Credit Risk Exposures



The Company’s exposure to credit risk mainly results from margin lending and client option and futures activities, securities lending activities, mortgage lending activities, pledged asset lending, its role as a counterparty in financial contracts and other investing activities. To manage the risks of such losses, the Company has established policies and procedures which include: establishing and reviewing credit limits, monitoring of credit limits and quality of counterparties, and adjusting margin, PAL, option, and futures requirements for certain securities. Collateral arrangements relating to margin loans, PALs, option positions, securities lending agreements, and resale agreements include provisions that require additional collateral in the event market fluctuations result in declines in the value of collateral received. Additionally, for margin loan, PAL and securities lending agreements, collateral arrangements require that the fair value of such collateral exceeds the amounts loaned.



Schwab performs clearing services for all securities transactions in its client accounts. Schwab has exposure to credit risk due to its obligation to settle transactions with clearing corporations, mutual funds, and other financial institutions even if Schwab’s clients or a counterparty fail to meet their obligations to Schwab.



The Company’s bank loan portfolio includes First Mortgages, HELOCs, PALs and other loans. The credit risk exposure related to loans is actively managed through individual and portfolio reviews . Management regularly reviews asset quality, including concentrations, delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charge-offs, and recoveries. All are factors in the determination of an appropriate allowance for loan losses.



The Company’s residential loan underwriting guidelines include maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, cash out limits, and minimum Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) credit scores. The specific guidelines are dependent on the individual characteristics of a loan (for example, whether the property is a primary or secondary residence, whether the loan is for investment property,

---

 

whether the loan is for an initial purchase of a home or refinance of an existing home, and whether the loan size is conforming or jumbo).



The Company does not originate or purchase residential loans that allow for negative amortization and does not purchase subprime loans (generally defined as extensions of credit to borrowers with a FICO score of less than 620 at origination), unless the borrower has compensating credit factors.



Among other items, the Company monitors the following information in evaluating the First Mortgage and HELOC portfolios and in the determination of an appropriate allowance for loan losses:





A portion of the Company’s HELOC portfolio is secured by second liens on the associated properties. Second lien mortgage loans possess a higher degree of credit risk given the subordination to the first lien holder in the event of default. At June 30 , 2016, $ 2.0 billion, or 79 %, of the HELOC portfolio was in a second lien position. In addition to the credit monitoring activities described above, the Company also monitors credit risk on second lien HELOC loans by reviewing the delinquency status of the first lien loan on the associated property. At June 30, 2016, approximately 30 % of the HELOC borrowers that had a balance only paid the minimum amount of interest due.



The following table presents certain of the Company’s bank loan quality metrics as a percentage of total outstanding bank loans:







For more information on the Company’s credit quality indicators relating to its First Mortgage and HELOC portfolios, including delinquency characteristics, borrower FICO scores at origination (Origination FICO) , updated borrower FICO scores (Updated FICO), LTV ratios at origination (Origination LTV) , and estimated current LTV ratios (Estimated Current LTV), see “Item 1 – Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – 4. Bank Loans and Related Allowance for Loan Losses.”



The Company has exposure to credit risk associated with its available for sale and securities held to maturity securities which include U.S. agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, corporate debt securities, U.S. agency notes, U.S. Treasury secur ities, certificates of deposit, U.S. state an d municipal securities, and commercial paper .  



At June 30, 2016, all securities in the available for sale and held to maturity portfolios were rated investment grade. U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities do not have explicit credit ratings; however, management considers these to be of the highest credit quality and rating given the guarantee of principal and interest by the U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.



---

 

Concentration Risk Exposures



The Company has exposure to concentration risk when holding large positions in financial instruments collateralized by assets with similar economic characteristics or in securities of a single issuer or within a particular industry or geographical area.



The fair value of the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed securities totaled $88.3  billion at June 30, 2016 . Of these, $87.1  billion were issued by U.S. agencies and $1.2  billion were issued by private entities (non-agency securities). These U.S. agency and non-agency securities are included in securities available for sale and securities held to maturity.



The fair value of the Company’s investments in asset-backed securities totaled $21.8  billion at June 30, 2016 . The Company holds $ 10.6  billion floating rate Federal Family Education Loan Program Asset-Backed Securities (FFELP ABS). Two Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations have placed a portion of FFELP ABS on review for downgrade. Both agencies have indicated that some classes could be downgraded below investment grade due to the risk that some remainder of the securities could be outstanding after their legal final maturity dates. The timing of FFELP ABS principal payment is inherently uncertain given the variety of payment options available to student loan borrowers. Loans collateralizing these securities continue to be covered by a guarantee from the Department of Education of at least 97% of principal and interest . The Company holds only senior class notes that have additional credit enhancement of 3% or more that, together with the Department of Education guarantee, provide 100% or more credit enhancement. The Company has an independent credit assessment function and it does not rely on rating agencies. The Company does not consider these securities to be impaired because it expects full payment of principal and interest. Therefore, the Company continues to assign them the highest internal credit rating.



The fair value of the Company’s investments in corporate debt securities and commercial paper totaled $ 11.0  billion at June 30, 2016 , with the majority issued by institutions in the financial services industry. These securities are included in securities available for sale, cash and cash equivalents, and other securities owned in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Issuer, geographic, and sector concentrations are controlled by established credit policy limits to each concentration type.



The Company’s bank loans include $ 7.6  billion of adjustable rate First Mortgage loans at June 30 , 2016. The Company’s adjustable rate mortgages have initial fixed interest rates for three to ten years and interest rates that adjust annually thereafter. Approximately 3 8 % of these mortgages consisted of loans with interest-only payment terms. The in terest rates on approximately 55 % of these interest-only loans are not scheduled to reset for three or more years. The Company’s mortgage loans do not include interest terms described as temporary introductory rates below current market rates.



The Company’s HELOC product has a 30-year loan term with a revolving period of ten years from the date of origination. After the revolving period, the balance outstanding at such time is converted to a 20-year amortizing loan. The interest rate during the revolving period and the 20-year amortizing period is a floating rate based on the prime rate plus a margin. HELOCs that convert to an amortizing loan may experience higher delinquencies and higher loss rates than those in the revolving period. The Company’s allowance for loan loss methodology takes this increased inherent risk into consideration. The following table presents when current outstanding HELOCs will convert to amortizing loans:





The Company also has exposure to concentration risk from its margin and securities le nding, PAL, and client option and futures activities collateralized by or referencing securities of a single issuer, an index, or within a single industry. This concentration risk is mitigated by collateral arrangements that require the fair value of such collateral exceed the amounts loaned.

---

 



The Company has indirect exposure to U.S. Government and agency securities held as collateral to secure its resale agreements. The Company’s primary credit exposure on these resale transactions is with its counterparty. The Company would have exposure to the U.S. Government and agency securities only in the event of the counterparty’s default on the resale agreements. The fair value of U.S. Government and agency securities held as collateral for resale agreements totaled $7.4  billion at June 30, 2016 .



Foreign Holdings



At June 30, 2016, t he   Company had exposure to non-sovereign financial and non-financial institutions in foreign countries of $6.8 billion, with the fair value of the top three exposures being to issuers and counterparties domiciled in Sweden at $1.4 billion, Canada at $1.4 billion and Australia at $1.3 billion. The Company has no direct exposure to sovereign foreign governments. The Company does not have unfunded commitments to counterparties in foreign countries, nor does it have exposure as a result of credit default protection purchased or sold separately as of June 30 , 2016.   In addition to the direct holdings in foreign companies, the Company has indirect exposure to foreign countries through its investments in Schwab sponsored money market funds (collectively, the Funds) resulting from brokerage clearing activities. At June 30, 2016 , the Company had $ 162  million in investments in these Funds. Certain of the Funds’ positions include certificates of deposits, time deposits, commercial paper and corporate debt securities issued by counterparties in foreign countries.   Additionally, at June 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding margin lo ans to foreign residents of $434  million, which are fully collateralized.





LIQUIDITY



CSC’s liquidity needs are primarily driven by the capital needs of Schwab Bank and liquidity and capital needs of Schwab, the amount of dividend payments on CSC’s common and preferred stock and principal and interest due on corporate debt. The liquidity needs of its brokerage subsidiaries are primarily driven by client activity including trading and margin borrowing activities and capital expenditures; and the capital needs of its bank subsidiary are primarily driven by client deposits.



The Company has established liquidity policies to support the successful execution of its business strategies, while ensuring ongoing and sufficient liquidity to meet its operational needs and satisfy applicable regulatory requirements under both normal and stress conditions. For additional information on the policies and methodologies used to monitor and manage liquidity, see “ Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.



Beginning on January 1, 2016, the Company became subject to the modified liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) rule which, when fully phased in, will require CSC to hold high-quality liquid ass ets equal to at least 70% of projected net cash outflows over a 30-day period , as defined by the rule . At June 30 , 2016, the Company was in compliance with the fully phased-in modified LCR rule. For additional information on the LCR rule, see “ Item 1 – Business – Regulation” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.



The Company’s primary source of funds is cash generated by client activity: bank deposits and cash balances in brokerage client accounts. Bank deposits swept from brokerage accounts were $ 116.0  billion at June 30 , 2016 compared to $108.1 billion at December 31, 2015. These funds were used to invest in interest earning assets, thereby funding a significant portion of the 8% growth in the Company’s balance sheet.



Other sources of funds may include cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities, repayments on loans, securities lending, and cash provided by external financing or equity offerings.



To meet daily funding needs, the Company maintains liquidity in the form of overnight cash deposits and short-term investments. For unanticipated liquidity needs, the Company maintai ns a buffer of highly liquid investments , currently comprised of U.S. Treasury notes.



---

 

In addition to internal sources of liquidity, the Company has sources of external funding. CSC maintains a   $750 million committed, unsecured credit facility with a group of banks that is scheduled to expire in June 201 7 .   This facility replaced a similar facility that expired in June 2016, and both facilit ies  w ere unused during the first half of 2016. The funds under this facility are available for general corporate purposes. The financial covenants require Schwab to maintain a minimum net capital ratio, Schwab Bank to be well capitalized, and CSC to maintain a minimum level of stockholders’ equi ty, adjusted to exclude AOCI .   At June 30 , 2016, the minimum level of stockholders’ equity required under this facility was $ 9.7  billion (CSC’s stockholders’ equity, excluding AOCI, at June 30 , 2016 was $ 15.0  billion). Management believes these restrictions will not have a material effect on CSC’s ability to meet foreseeable dividend or funding requirements.



CSC and Schwab also have access to uncommitted, unsecured bank credit lines with several banks. The need for short-term borrowings from these sources arise s primarily from timing differences between cash flow requirements, scheduled liquidation of interest-earning investments, and movements of cash to meet regulatory brokerage client cash segregation requirements. These lines were not used by CSC during the first half of 2016. Schwab used such borrowings for one day during the first half of 2016 for $ 15  million , and t here were no borrowings outstanding under these lines at June 30 , 2016.



To partially satisfy the margin requirement of client option transactions with the Options Clearing Corporation, the broker-dealer subsidiaries have unsecured standby letter of credit agreements (LOCs) with several banks in favor of the Options Clearing Corporation aggregating $ 310  million at June 30 , 2016. There were no funds drawn under any of these LOCs during the first half of 2016. In connection with its securities lending activities, the Company is required to provide collateral to certain brokerage clients. The collateral requirements were satisfied by providing cash as collateral.



Schwab Bank has access to short-term secured funding through the Federal Reserve’s discount window. Amounts available under the Federal Reserve discount window are dependent on the fair value of certain of Schwab Bank’s securities available for sale and/or securities held to maturity that are pledged as collateral. Schwab Bank maintains policies and procedures necessary to access this funding and tests discount window borrowing procedures on a periodic basis. At June 30 , 2016, $ 1.8  billion was available under this arrangement. There were no funds drawn under this arrangement during the first half of 2016.



Schwab Bank also maintains a secured credit facility with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Amounts available under this facility are dependent on the amount of Schwab Bank’s First Mortgages , HELOCs , and the fair value of certain of Schwab’s securities available for sale and/or securities held to maturity that are pledged as collateral. Schwab Bank maintains policies and procedures necessary to access this funding and tests borrowing procedures on a periodic basis. At June 30 , 2016, $ 5.0   b illion was outstanding under this facility with an additional $ 3.9  billion available based on the loans currently pledged there. This funding source is being used to temporarily support recent investment purchases until later in 2016 when management expects to complete plan ned bulk transfers of uninvested client brokerage cash to Schwab Bank.



CSC has authorization from its Board of Directors to issue unsecured commercial paper notes (Commercial Paper Notes) not to exceed $1.5 billion . Management has set a current limit for the commercial paper program not to exceed the amount of the committed, unsecured credit facility, which was $ 750  million at June 30 , 2016. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes may vary, but are not to exceed 270 days from the date of issue. The commercial paper is not redeemable prior to maturity and cannot be voluntarily prepaid. The proceeds of the commercial paper program are to be used for general corporate purposes. CSC’s ratings for these short-term borrowings are P1 by   Moody’s, A1 by Standard & Poor’s, and F1 by Fitch. CSC had no Commercial Paper Notes   outstanding as of June 30 , 2016.



CSC had long-term debt of $ 2.9  billion  a t   June 30 , 2016 and December 31, 2015, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 3.38 %. CSC has a universal automatic shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) which enables it to issue debt, equity, and other securities.



---

 

The following are details of CSC’s long-term debt:





On March 7, 2016, CSC completed an equity offering of 30 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/40 th ownership interest in a share of 5.95% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock (Series D Preferred Stock). The net proceeds from the sale were $72 5  million. CSC’s preferred stock is rated Baa2 by Moody’s, BBB by Standard & Poor’s, and BB+ by Fitch.



For further discussion of CSC’s long-term debt and information on the equity offering, see “Item 1 – Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – 7. Borrowings and 11. Stockholders’ Equity.”





CAPITAL MANAGEMENT



The Company seeks to manage capital to a level and composition sufficient to support execution of its business strategy, including anticipated balance sheet growth, providing financial support to its subsidiaries, and sustained access to the capital markets, while at the same time meeting its regulatory capital requirements and serving as a source of financial strength to Schwab Bank. The Company’s primary sources of capital are funds generated by the operations of its subsidiaries and securities issuances by CSC in the capital markets. To ensure that it has a sufficient amount of capital to absorb unanticipated losses or declines in asset values, the Company has adopted a policy to remain well capitalized even in stressed scenarios.



Internal guidelines are set, for both the Company and its regulated subsidiaries, to ensure capital levels are in line with the Company’s strategy and regulatory requirements, and capital forecasts are reviewed monthly at Capital Planning and Asset-Liability Management and Pricing Committee meetings. A number of early warning indicators are monitored to help identify potential problems that could impact capital. In addition, the Company monitors its subsidiaries’ capital levels and requirements. Subject to regulatory capital requirements and any required approvals, any excess capital held by subsidiaries is transferred to CSC in the form of dividends and returns of capital. When subsidiaries have need of additional capital, funds are provided by CSC as equity investments and also as subordinated loans (in a form approved as regulatory capital by regulators) for Schwab. The details and method used for each cash infusion are based on an analysis of the particular entity’s needs and financing alternatives. The amounts and structure of infusions must take into consideration maintenance of regulatory capital requirements, debt/equity ratios, and equity double leverage ratios.



The Company conducts regular capital stress testing to assess the potential financial impacts of various adverse macroeconomic and company-specific events to which the Company could be subjected. The objective of the Company’s capital stress testing is (1) to explore various potential outcomes – including rare and extreme events and (2) to assess impacts of potential stressful outcomes on both capital and liquidity. Additionally, the Company has a comprehensive Capital Contingency Plan to provide action plans for certain low probability/high impact capital events that the Company might face. The Capital Contingency Plan is issued under the authority of the Asset-Liability Management and Pricing Committee and provides guidelines for sustained capital events. It does not specifically address every contingency, but is designed to provide a framework for responding to any capital stress. The Capital Contingency Plan is reviewed annually and updated as appropriate.



For additional information, see “Part I –   Item 1 – Business – Regulation” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.



Regulatory Capital Requirements



CSC is subject to capital requirements set by the Federal Reserve and is required to serve as a source of strength for Schwab Bank and to provide financial assistance if Schwab Bank experiences financial distress. To manage capital adequacy, the Company currently utilizes a target Tier 1 Leverage Ratio for CSC of at least 6%. Due to the relatively low risk of the

---

 

Company’s balance sheet assets and risk-based capital ratios at CSC and Schwab Bank that are well in excess of regulatory requirements, the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio is the most restrictive capital constraint on CSC’s asset growth.



Schwab Bank is subject to capital requirements set by the OCC that are substantially similar to those imposed on CSC by the Federal Reserve. Schwab Bank’s failure to remain well capitalized could result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the bank. The Company currently utilizes a target Tier 1 Leverage Ratio for Schwab Bank of at leas t   6.25%. Based on its regulatory capital ratios at June 30 , 2016, Schwab Bank is considered well capitalized.



The following table details CSC’s and Schwab Bank’s capital ratios:







Schwab Bank is also subject to regulatory requirements that restrict and govern the terms of affiliate transactions. In addition, Schwab Bank is required to provide notice to, and may be required to obtain approval from, the OCC and the Federal Reserve to declare dividends to CSC.



The Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries (Schwab and optionsXpress, Inc.) are subject to regulatory requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule. The rule is intended to ensure the general financial soundness and liquidity of broker-dealers. These regulations prohibit the broker-dealer subsidiaries from paying cash dividends, making unsecured advances and loans to their parent company and employees, and from repaying subordinated borrowings from CSC if such payment would result in a net capital amount of less than 5% of aggregate debit balances or less than 120% of its minimum dollar requirement of $250,000. As such, the broker-dealer subsidiaries are required to maintain, at all times, at least the minimum level of net capital required under Rule 15c3-1. At June 30, 2016, Schwab and optionsXpress, Inc. met and exceeded their net capital requirements.



In addition to the capital requirements above, the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory requirements that are intended to ensure financial soundness and liquidity. See “Item 1 – Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – 14. Regulatory Requirements” for additional information o n the components of stockholder s ’ equity and information on the capital requirements of each of the subsidiaries.





---

 

Dividends



On April 21, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a one cent, or 17%, increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.07 per common share. The following table details the CSC cash dividends paid and per share amounts for the first halves of 2016 and 2015:











Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



The Company enters into various off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business, primarily to meet the needs of its clients. These arrangements include firm commitments to extend credit. Additionally, the Company enters into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. For discussion on the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see “Part II – Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and “Item 1 – Notes to Condensed Consolidated F inancial Statements (Unaudited) – 8. Commitments and Contingencies.”





Critical Accounting ESTIMATES



Certain of the Company’s accounting policies that involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity are discussed in “Part II – Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Estimates” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There have been no changes to these critical accounting estimates during the first half of 2016.