AIR T INC (Form: 10-Q, Received: 08/04/2006 14:00:18)

	UNITED STATES
	SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
	WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

	FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)
X	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from _____to _____


	Commission File Number 0-11720

	Air T, Inc.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	Delaware 52-1206400
	(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

	Post Office Box 488, Denver, North Carolina 28037
	(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

	(704) 377-2109
	(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

	Yes __ X___ No ______

	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (see definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer) in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

	Large Accelerated Filer_____ Accelerated Filer______ Non-Accelerated Filer__ X ___


	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

	Yes______ No ___X___


	APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
	Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	2,671,293 Common Shares, par value of $.25 per share were outstanding as of July 28, 2006.

		AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

		INDEX
			PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


	Item 1. Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	for the three-months ended
	June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)		3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
	June 30, 2006 (Unaudited)
	and March 31, 2006		4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
	Flows for the three-months
	ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)		5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’
	Equity and Other Comprehensive Income for the
	three-months ended June 30,
	2006 and 2005(Unaudited)		6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
	Statements (Unaudited)		7-13

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis
		of Financial Condition and Results
		of Operations	13-19

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
		About Market Risk	19

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19-20

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	20-21


	Item 6.	Exhibits	22

		Signatures	22

		Exhibit Index	23

Item 1. Financial Statements

AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006			2005
Operating Revenues:
Overnight air cargo	$	8,575,952		$	11,228,153
Ground equipment		7,507,857			5,988,148
		16,083,809			17,216,301

Operating Expenses:
Flight-air cargo		4,173,861			4,345,200
Maintenance-air cargo		3,098,683			5,273,977
Ground equipment		5,258,264			4,723,260
General and administrative		2,271,552			2,272,398
Depreciation and amortization		176,834			154,772
		14,979,194			16,769,607

Operating Income		1,104,615			446,694

Non-operating Expense (Income):
Interest		4,109			25,226
Deferred retirement expense		5,250			5,250
Investment income and other		(60,441	)		(33,220	)
		(51,082	)		(2,744	)


Earnings Before Income Taxes		1,155,697			449,438

Income Tax Expense		428,902			171,368

Net Earnings	$	726,795		$	278,070


Basic and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share	$	0.27		$	0.10


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		2,671,293			2,671,293
Diluted		2,671,732			2,671,896

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		June30, 2006			March 31, 2006
ASSETS		(Unaudited	)		(Note	)
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,757,184		$	2,702,424
Marketable securities		796,005			807,818
Accounts receivable, less allowance
for doubtful accounts of $495,385 at June
30, 2006 and $481,837 at March 31, 2006		4,411,730			8,692,971
Income taxes receivable		-			108,553
Notes and other non-trade receivables-current		69,873			104,086
Inventories, net		6,973,331			5,705,591
Deferred tax assets		686,953			576,640
Prepaid expenses and other		122,942			334,064
Total Current Assets		18,818,018			19,032,147

Property and Equipment		8,376,786			9,076,063
Less accumulated depreciation		(5,896,781	)		(5,907,520	)
Property and Equipment, net		2,480,005			3,168,543

Deferred Tax Assets		163,344			194,996
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance Policies		1,248,481			1,231,481
Notes and Other Non-Trade Receivables-Long Term		237,871			214,653
Other Assets		46,001			81,537
Total Assets	$	22,993,720		$	23,923,357

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,779,712		$	5,354,713
Income taxes payable		79,715			-
Accrued expenses		1,696,511			2,411,262
Current portion of long-term debt and obligations		180,834			186,492
Total Current Liabilities		6,736,772			7,952,467

Capital Lease Obligations (less current portion)		46,203			50,577
Long-Term Debt (less current portion)		937,582			712,883
Deferred Retirement Obligations (less current portion)		695,213			707,388

Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized 50,000 shares,
none issued		-			-
Common stock, par value $.25; authorized 4,000,000 shares;
2,671,293 shares issued and outstanding		667,823			667,823
Additional paid in capital		6,970,107			6,939,357
Retained earnings		6,899,355			6,840,383
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		40,665			52,479
		14,577,950			14,500,042
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	22,993,720		$	23,923,357

Note: The balance sheet at March 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	726,795		$	278,070
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Change in accounts receivable and inventory reserves		162,579			2,187
Depreciation and amortization		176,834			154,772
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(17,000	)		(25,000	)
Deferred tax provision		(78,661	)		-
Net periodic pension cost		2,303			19,999
Warranty reserve		(47,767	)		(21,000	)
Vesting of stock option expense		30,750			-
Change in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
Accounts receivable		4,267,693			1,375,503
Notes receivable		10,995			37,033
Income taxes receivable/payable		188,268			146,589
Inventories		(871,035	)		(757,203	)
Prepaid expenses and other		246,658			11,696
Accounts payable		(575,001	)		(1,139,523	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(681,463	)		263,243
Total adjustments		2,815,153			68,296
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,541,948			346,366
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(34,032	)		(107,007	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(34,032	)		(107,007	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on aircraft term loan		(22,243	)		(24,202	)
Net borrowings on line of credit		280,211			417,555
Payments on capital leases		(43,301	)		3,119
Payment of cash dividend		(667,823	)		(667,633	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(453,156	)		(271,161	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents		3,054,760			(31,802	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,702,424			3,497,659
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5,757,184		$	3,465,857

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	24,518		$	38,353
Income taxes		318,060			22,677

Summary of significant non-cash information:
Increase (decrease) in fair value of marketable securities, net of tax	$	(11,814	)	$	26,041
Leased equipment transferred from inventory		(766,022	)		(806,728	)


See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

AIR T, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

											Accumulated
	Common Stock					Additional		Retained			Other			Total
						Paid-in		Earnings			Comprehensive			Stockholders'
		Shares		Amount		Capital					Income			Equity

Balance, March 31, 2005		2,671,293	$	667,823	$	6,939,357	$	5,453,105		$	25,268		$	13,085,553

Comprehensive Income:
Net earnings								278,070
Change in investment value,
net of tax											26,041
Change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net of tax											13,296
Total Comprehensive Income														317,407
Cash dividend
($0.25 per share)								(667,633	)					(667,633	)

Balance, June 30, 2005		2,671,293	$	667,823	$	6,939,357	$	5,063,542		$	64,605		$	12,735,327



											Accumulated
	Common Stock					Additional		Retained			Other			Total
						Paid-In		Earnings			Comprehensive			Stockholders'
		Shares		Amount		Capital					Income (Loss	)		Equity

Balance, March 31, 2006		2,671,293	$	667,823	$	6,939,357	$	6,840,383		$	52,479		$	14,500,042

Comprehensive Income:
Net earnings								726,795
Change in investment value,
net of tax											(11,814	)


Total Comprehensive Income														714,981

Cash dividend
($0.25 per share)								(667,823	)					(667,823	)
Vesting of stock options						30,750								30,750

Balance, June 30, 2006		2,671,293	$	667,823	$	6,970,107	$	6,899,355		$	40,665		$	14,577,950


See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1. Financial Statement Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2006 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared by Air T, Inc. (the Company) without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of June 30, 2006, and for prior periods presented, have been made.

It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006. The results of operations for the period ended June 30 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

2. Income Taxes

The tax effect of temporary differences, primarily asset reserves and accrued liabilities, gave rise to the Company's deferred tax asset in the accompanying June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 consolidated balance sheets. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequence of such temporary differences at the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.

The income tax provision for the respective three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 differ from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of state income taxes and, to a lesser extent, other permanent differences.

3. Net Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share has been calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, shares issuable under employee stock options were considered potential common shares and were included in the weighted average common shares unless they were anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, 1,000 outstanding stock options were anti-dilutive.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006		2005

Net earnings	$	726,795	$	278,070

Basic and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share	$	0.27	$	0.10

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		2,671,293		2,671,293
Plus: Incremental shares from stock options		439		603
Diluted		2,671,732		2,671,896

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

		June 30, 2006			March 31, 2006
Aircraft parts and supplies	$	623,610		$	621,111
Ground equipment manufacturing:
Raw materials		5,549,233			4,178,451
Work in process		805,466			1,270,944
Finished goods		594,640			85,672
Total inventory		7,572,949			6,156,178
Reserves		(599,618	)		(450,587	)

Total, net of reserves	$	6,973,331		$	5,705,591

5. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109." This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

At June 30, 2006, the Company had one stock option plan (the Plan) in effect, which is discussed more fully below. Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the Plan under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation . No stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the Statement of Operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, as no options were granted during that period. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , using the modified-prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the three month period ended June 30, 2006 included: (a) compensation cost for a quarter of all share-based payments granted prior to April 1, 2006, but not yet vested as of June 30, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to March 31, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement 123(R). Results for the prior period have not been restated.

As a result of adopting Statement 123(R) on April 1, 2006, the Company’s income before income taxes and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006, was $30,750 and $18,476 lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.28 and $0.28, respectively, if the Company had not adopted Statement 123(R), compared to reported basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.27 and $0.27, respectively.

Prior to the adoption of Statement 123(R), the Company did not present tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Statement of Cash Flows. Statement 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.

No options were granted under the Company’s stock option plan for the three months ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.

The compensation cost that had been charged against net income for the Plan was $18,476 and $-0- for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for the share-based compensation arrangements was $12,274 and $-0- for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Company’s Plan, which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of share options and shares to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 250,000 shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees and directors with those of its shareholders. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; for employee options, the plan provides that awards generally vest one-third per year after the first anniversary date from the date of grant; for non-employee director options, those option awards vest one year after the date of grant; all options have 10-year contractual terms. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options. Certain options and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the Plan). No employee options have been awarded under the plan.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock, and other factors. Dividend yields are based on the last three years’ dividends divided by the average high and low stock prices for the period. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

	Three Months Ended
		June 30, 2006
Expected volatility		92.01	%
Expected dividends		1.90	%
Expected term (in years)		10.0
Risk-free rate		3.86	%

A summary of option activity under the Plan as of June 30, 2006, and changes during the three months then ended is presented below:

				Weighted
			Weighted	Average
			Average	Remaining			Aggregate
			Exercise	Contractual			Intrinsic
	Shares		Price	Term (yrs	)		Value
Options
Outstanding at April 1, 2006	17,000	$	11.02	9.9		$	1,190
Granted	-		-				-
Exercised	-		-				-
Forfeited	-		-				-
Expired	-		-				-
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	17,000	$	11.02	9.7		$	1,190
Vested or expected to vest
at June 30, 2006	-		-	-			-
Exercisable at June 30, 2006	2,000	$	17.58	5.3		$	-

No options were granted or exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006, and changes during the three months ended June 30, 2006, is presented below:

			Average
			Grant-Date
	Shares		Fair Value

Nonvested at April 1, 2006	15,000	$	123,000
Granted	-		-
Vested	-		-
Forfeited	-		-
Nonvested at June 30, 2006	15,000	$	123,000

As of June 30, 2006, there was $30,750 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. No shares vested during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

6. Warranty Reserves

The Company’s ground equipment subsidiary warranties its products for up to a two-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted quarterly as actual warranty cost becomes known.

Product warranty reserve activity during the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006			2005

Beginning balance	$	285,000		$	198,000
Additions and adjustments to reserve		(34,000	)		(7,000	)
Use of reserve		(14,000	)		(14,000	)
Ending balance	$	237,000		$	177,000

7. Derivative Financial Instruments

As required by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value.

The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates. To manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time.

The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2006 the Company had no derivative financial instruments outstanding. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates on certain portions of its line of credit, which bears interest based on the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. If the LIBOR interest rate had been increased by one percentage point, based on the balance of the line of credit at June 30, 2006, annual interest expense would have increased by approximately $2,800.

8. Financing Arrangements

In August 2005, the Company amended its $7,000,000 secured long-term revolving credit line to extend its expiration date to August 31, 2007. In order to more closely match the credit line’s limits to the Company’s financing needs, the credit line limit was amended to $8,000,000 from January 12, 2006 to April 30, 2006 and $7,000,000 from May 1, 2006 to expiration date. The revolving credit line contains customary events of default, a subjective acceleration clause and restrictive covenants that, among other matters, require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. There is no requirement for the Company to maintain a lock-box arrangement under this agreement. As of June 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants. The amount of credit available to the Company under the agreement at any given time is determined by an availability calculation, based on the eligible borrowing base, as defined in the credit agreement, which includes the Company’s outstanding receivables, inventories and equipment, with certain exclusions. At June 30, 2006, $6,185,000 was available under the terms of the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

Amounts advanced under the credit facility bear interest at the 30-day “LIBOR” rate plus 137 basis points. The LIBOR rate at June 30, 2006 was 5.33%. At June 30, 2006 $280,000 was outstanding against the line.

In March 2004, the Company utilized its revolving credit line to acquire a corporate aircraft for $975,000. In April 2004, the Company refinanced the aircraft under a secured 4.35% fixed rate five-year term loan, based on a ten-year amortization with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year.

The Company assumes various financial obligations and commitments in the normal course of its operations and financing activities. Financial obligations are considered to represent known future cash payments that the Company is required to make under existing contractual arrangements such as debt and lease agreements.

9. Segment Information

The Company operates three subsidiaries in two business segments, overnight air cargo and ground equipment. Each business segment has separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products and services. The overnight air cargo segment encompasses services provided primarily to one customer, Federal Express Corporation, and the ground equipment segment encompasses the operations of Global Ground Support, LLC (“Global”).

The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income.

Segment data is summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
		2006			2005

Operating Revenues
Overnight Air Cargo	$	8,575,952		$	11,228,153
Ground Equipment:
Domestic		7,470,357			5,905,398
International		37,500			82,750
Total Ground Equipment		7,507,857			5,988,148
Total	$	16,083,809		$	17,216,301

Operating Income (Loss)
Overnight Air Cargo	$	462,538		$	630,415
Ground Equipment		1,357,755			405,337
Corporate (1)		(715,678	)		(589,058	)
Total	$	1,104,615		$	446,694

Depreciation and Amortization
Overnight Air Cargo	$	125,957		$	103,697
Ground Equipment		39,040			34,496
Corporate		11,837			16,579
Total	$	176,834		$	154,772

Capital Expenditures, net
Overnight Air Cargo	$	5,000		$	63,629
Ground Equipment		-			10,219
Corporate		29,032			33,159
Total	$	34,032		$	107,007


	As of
		June 30, 2006			March 31, 2006
Identifiable Assets
Overnight Air Cargo	$	4,401,493		$	6,298,618
Ground Equipment		10,739,420			12,620,815
Corporate		7,852,807			5,003,924

Total	$	22,993,720		$	23,923,357

(1) Includes income from inter-segment transactions.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

On February 28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold by Global for installation at the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport, and maintained by Global, collapsed on an Airbus A330 aircraft operated by U.S. Airways. While the aircraft suffered some structural damage, no passengers or crew on the aircraft were injured. The operator of the deicing boom has claimed to suffer injuries in connection with the collapse. Immediately following this incident, the remaining eleven fixed stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness. These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional 135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model that have been sold by Global.

In June 2005, after an independent structural engineering firm’s investigation identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11 booms and Global’s subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. Under this agreement, Global agreed to effect the repairs to these booms at its expense and reserved its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City of Philadelphia will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms. However, the City of Philadelphia retains its rights with respect to any cause of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005.

On October 14, 2005, Global completed the repair, installation and recertification of ten of the deicing booms. Repair had been completed on the eleventh boom, which was then damaged in transit to the Philadelphia airport by an independent carrier. The additional repair work on that boom has been completed and the boom is awaiting delivery back to the airport. The carrier had initially undertaken that such further repair work would be at its expense, though the carrier has not yet approved the final expense of such repair work.

Global has been named as a defendant in two legal actions arising from the February 2005 boom collapse at the Philadelphia airport. In the first, U.S. Airways vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al. , which is pending in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, U.S. Airways initiated an action on April 7, 2006 against Global and its subcontractor seeking to recover approximately $2.9 million, representing the alleged cost to repair of the damaged Airbus A330 aircraft and loss of use of the aircraft while it was being repaired. This matter is in the initial stage of discovery. In the second action, Emerson vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al. , pending in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, the boom operator is seeking to recover unspecified damages from Global and its subcontractor for injuries arising from the collapse of the boom. This matter was initiated on October 21, 2005 and is scheduled for trial in November 2007. The Company understands that the boom operator has recovered from his injuries and has returned to fulltime work. Global maintains product liability insurance in excess of the amount of the recoveries claimed above and is being defended in both of these matters by its product liability insurance carrier. Global’s insurance coverage does not extend to the costs incurred by Global to examine and repair the other 11 booms at the Philadelphia airport.

On August 4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment Company, Global’s subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover approximately $905,000 in costs incurred by Global in fiscal 2006 in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. That case has been removed to federal court and is pending before United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been assigned to the same judge before whom the U.S. Airways litigation is pending against Global. This matter is in the initial stage of discovery. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful, in this action.

The Company is currently involved in certain personal injury and environmental matters, which involve pending or threatened lawsuits. Management believes the results of these pending or threatened lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

The Company operates in two business segments, providing overnight air cargo services to the express delivery services industry and aviation ground support and other specialized equipment products to passenger and cargo airlines, airports, the military and industrial customers. Each business segment has separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products and services. The Company’s air cargo operations, which are comprised of its Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (“MAC”) and CSA Air, Inc. (“CSA”) subsidiaries, accounted for 53.3% and 65.2% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s ground support operations, comprised of its Global Ground Support, LLC subsidiary (“Global”), accounted for the remaining 46.7% and 34.8% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

MAC and CSA provide short-haul express air freight services primarily to one customer, Federal Express Corporation (the Customer). Under the terms of its Customer’s dry-lease service agreements which currently cover approximately 98% of the revenue aircraft operated, the Company charges an administrative fee and passes through to its customer certain other cost components of its operations without markup. The cost of fuel, flight crews, landing fees, outside maintenance, parts and certain other direct operating costs are included in operating expenses and billed to the customer as cargo and maintenance revenue, at cost.

Separate agreements cover the four types of aircraft operated by MAC and CSA for their customer—Cessna Caravan, ATR-42/72, Fokker F-27, and Short Brothers SD3-30. Cessna Caravan, ATR-42/72 and Fokker F-27 aircraft (a total of 91 aircraft at June 30, 2006) are owned by and dry-leased from the Customer, and the Short Brothers SD3-30 aircraft (two aircraft at June 30, 2006) are owned by the Company.

The SD3-30’s are operated periodically under wet-lease arrangements with the Customer. Pursuant to such agreements, the Customer determines the type of aircraft and schedule of routes to be flown by MAC and CSA, with all other operational decisions made by the Company.

Agreements with the customer are renewable annually and may be terminated by the Customer at any time upon 15 to 30 days’ notice. The Company believes that the short term and other provisions of its agreements with the Customer are standard within the air freight contract delivery service industry. Loss of its contracts with the Customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

MAC and CSA’s revenues contributed approximately $8,576,000 and $11,228,000 to the Company’s revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, a current year decrease of approximately 24%. The decrease in revenues was related to a decrease in maintenance services and acquisition of aircraft parts, which were primarily attributed to wind-down and completion of the customer’s fleet modernization, associated with conversion of ATR aircraft from passenger to cargo configuration during fiscal 2006.

Global, which provides the remainder of the Company’s revenue, manufactures, services and supports aviation ground support and specialized military and industrial equipment on a worldwide basis. Global’s revenue contributed approximately $7,508,000 and $5,988,000 to the Company’s revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The approximately 25% increase in revenues was primarily related to an increase in the number and a change in the mix of customer equipment orders completed during the current period.

Global’s results in fiscal 2006 were adversely affected as the result of the collapse of one of twelve fixed-stand deicing booms sold by Global for installation at the Philadelphia airport as detailed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies. Following the collapse of the boom, Global undertook to examine and repair the eleven remaining booms and incurred expense of approximately $905,000 in fiscal 2006 in connection these activities. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 Global recorded approximately $373,000 in operating expenses in connection with its efforts to return the booms to service. No boom repair related costs were recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Although Global has initiated legal action to recover these expenses from its subcontractor, the Company cannot provide assurance of the amount or timing of any such recovery.

Outlook

The Company’s forecast for the remainder of fiscal 2007 suggests that, due to higher fuel cost and increasing rates of inflation, the commercial aviation market will continue to grow at a rate that is less than the rest of the economy. Continued international sales, military and Homeland Security budgets, pending funding approvals, and increased activity by outside service providers which have taken over the deicing responsibilities of several airlines and airports may help offset the expected lower-than-normal order levels from domestic passenger airline commercial customers. Company management currently anticipates that, although, its air cargo segment will continue to benefit from the increased administrative fees associated with its customer’s aircraft fleet modernization and route expansion throughout fiscal 2007, decreased maintenance revenues associated with the recent fleet modernization will reduce operating revenue and margins. Given the uncertainties associated with the above factors, the Company continues to operate in a highly unpredictable environment.

Based on the current general worldwide political, economic and industry outlook and cost cutting measures implemented during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 and first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company believes its existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and funds available from current and renewed credit facilities will be adequate to meet its current and anticipated working capital requirements throughout fiscal 2007. If these sources are inadequate or become unavailable, then the Company may pursue additional funds through the financing of unencumbered assets or sale of equity securities, although there is no assurance these additional funds will be sufficient to replace the sources that are inadequate or become unavailable.

Actual results for fiscal 2007 will depend upon a number of factors beyond the Company’s control, including, in part, the magnitude of future international orders, potential additional transition of the aircraft fleet operated for the Company’s air cargo customer, the timing, speed and magnitude of the economic recovery of the aviation industry, military funding of pending future equipment orders, future levels of commercial aviation capital spending, future terrorists acts and weather patterns.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases these estimates and assumptions upon the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The Company’s estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from estimates. The most significant estimates made by management include allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves for excess and obsolete inventories, warranty reserves, deferred tax asset valuation, retirement benefit obligations, valuation of revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method and valuation of long-lived assets.

Following is a discussion of critical accounting policies and related management estimates and assumptions.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts receivable in the amount of $495,000 and $482,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, was established based on management’s estimates of the collectability of accounts receivable. The required allowance is determined using information such as customer credit history, industry information, credit reports, customer financial condition and the collectability of outstanding accounts receivables associated with a discontinued business segment. The estimates can be affected by changes in the financial strength of the aviation industry, customer credit issues or general economic conditions.

Inventories. The Company’s parts inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Reserves for excess and obsolete inventories in the amount of $600,000 and $451,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, are based on assessment of the marketability of slow-moving and obsolete inventories. Estimates are subject to volatility and can be affected by reduced equipment utilization, existing supplies of used inventory available for sale, the retirement of aircraft or ground equipment and changes in the financial strength of the aviation industry.

Warranty Reserves. The Company warranties its ground equipment products for up to a two-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted quarterly as actual warranty cost becomes known.

Product warranty reserve activity during three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006			2005

Beginning balance	$	285,000		$	198,000
Additions and adjustments to reserve		(34,000	)		(7,000	)
Use of reserve		(14,000	)		(14,000	)
Ending balance	$	237,000		$	177,000

Deferred Taxes. Net deferred tax assets are shown net of valuation allowance in the amount of $82,000, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 to reflect the likelihood of the recoverability of certain of these assets. Company judgment of the recoverability of certain of these assets is based primarily on estimates of current and expected future earnings and tax planning.

Retirement Benefits Obligation. The Company currently determines the value of retirement benefits assets and liabilities on an actuarial basis using a 5.75% discount rate. Long-term deferred retirement benefit obligations amounted to $695,000 and $707,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006. Values are affected by current independent indices, which estimate the expected return on insurance policies and the discount rates used. Changes in the discount rate used will affect the amount of pension liability as well as pension gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income.

In 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors confirmed the level of retirement benefits under existing agreements for certain executive officers at amounts approximately $510,000 less than had been previously accrued. Based on an estimated average term to retirement of these officers of four years, the accrual was reduced by $129,000 in fiscal 2005, and, subject to other adjustments, similar reductions would occur in the next three fiscal years. The reduction in the accrual reduced general and administrative expense by that amount.

Revenue Recognition. Cargo revenue is recognized upon completion of contract terms and maintenance revenue is recognized when the service has been performed. Revenue from product sales is recognized when contract terms are completed and title has passed to customers. Revenues from long-term fixed price manufacturing projects are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The Company was not engaged in any long-term fixed-price contracts in the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses long-lived assets used in operations for impairment when events and circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amount. In the event it is determined that the carrying values of long-lived assets are in excess of the fair value of those assets, the Company then will write-down the value of the assets to fair value.

Company Adoption Of Stock Based Compensation Reporting Under FAS 123(R)

No options were granted under the Company’s stock option plan for the three months ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.

The Company’s Plan, which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of share options and shares to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 250,000 shares of common stock. The company believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees and directors with those of its shareholders. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; for employee options, the plan provides that awards generally vest one-third per year after the first anniversary date from the date of grant; for non-employee director options, those option awards vest one year after the date of grant; all options have 10-year contractual terms. No employee options have been awarded under the plan. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options. Certain options and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the Plan). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula.

Seasonality

Global’s business has historically been highly seasonal. Due to the nature of its product line, the bulk of Global’s revenues and earnings have typically occurred during the second and third fiscal quarters in anticipation of the winter season, and comparatively little has occurred during the first and fourth fiscal quarters. The Company has continued its efforts to reduce Global’s seasonal fluctuation in revenues and earnings by increasing international sales and broadening its product line to increase revenues and earnings in the first and fourth fiscal quarters. In June 1999, Global was awarded a four-year contract to supply deicing equipment to the United States Air Force, and Global has been awarded two three-year extensions on the contract. In March 2003 and December 2005 Global, respectively, received a large scale, fixed-stand deicer contract from the City of Philadelphia and a large mobile deice equipment order from China, which the Company believes contributed to management’s plan to reduce seasonal fluctuation in revenues during fiscal 2004 and 2006. However, since these contracts have been completed, Global is more susceptible to the resumption of historical seasonal trends. The remainder of the Company’s business is not materially seasonal.

Results of Operations

Consolidated revenue decreased $1,132,000 (6.6%) to $16,084,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to its equivalent 2005 period. The decrease in revenues resulted from a $2,652,000 decrease in air cargo maintenance revenues, primarily related to decreased direct operating costs, passed through to the Company’s Customer at cost, and maintenance service revenues, as discussed above in Overview, offset by a $1,520,000 increase in the ground equipment revenue related to increased deicer sales, as discussed above in Overview.

Operating expenses decreased $1,790,000 (10.7%) to $14,979,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to its equivalent 2005 period. The net decrease in operating expenses consisted of the following: cost of flight operations decreased $171,000 (3.9%) primarily as a result of decreased costs associated with flight department and pilot staffing and pilot travel due to completion of customer flight schedule changes; maintenance expense decreased $2,175,000 (41.3%) primarily as a result of decreases in the volume of aircraft parts purchased for ATR aircraft and cost of MAC and outside maintenance, maintenance personnel, cost of travel and contract services, related to customer fleet modernization; ground equipment operating expenses increased $535,000 (11.3%), as a result of the current quarter’s increase in customer orders, partially offset by $373,000 in costs related to the Philadelphia boom repairs booked by Global in the quarter ended June 30, 2005; depreciation and amortization increased $22,000 (14.3%) as a result of depreciation on purchases of capital assets; and general and administrative expense decreased $1,000 primarily as a result of decreased staff salaries and expense and professional fees, partially offset by an increase in employee’s profit sharing provision.

The current period’s increased operating income ($658,000) (147.0%) resulted primarily from higher equipment unit sales and order mix in the ground equipment sector, partly offset by decreased maintenance revenues associated with the air cargo segment.

Non-operating expense, net, decreased $48,000 as a result an increase of earnings on marketable securities and reduced interest expense due to lower levels of borrowing in the three-month period ended June 30, 2006.

Pretax earnings increased $706,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to 2005, principally due to the above stated ground equipment segment’s increased sales offset by decreased maintenance revenue related to the air cargo segment.

The provision for income taxes for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 increased $258,000 compared to the 2005 period, primarily due to increased current period pretax earnings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2006 the Company's working capital amounted to $12,080,000, an increase of $1,000,000 compared to March 31, 2006. The net increase primarily resulted from an increase in cash and cash equivalents and inventory and a decrease in accounts payable and accrual expenses, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. The change in accounts receivable was principally the result of the timing of payment of certain accounts.

The respective three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 resulted in the following changes in cash flow: operating activities provided $3,542,000 and $346,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, investing activities used $34,000 and $107,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, and financing activities used $453,000 and $271,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash increased $3,055,000 and decreased $32,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Cash provided by operating activities was $3,196,000 more for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the similar 2005 period, principally due to decreased accounts receivables.

Cash used in investing activities for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $73,000 less than the comparable period in 2005 due to decreased current period capital expenditures.

Cash used in financing activities was $182,000 more in the 2006 three-month period than in the corresponding 2005 period due to a decrease in the current period line of credit borrowings.

There are currently no commitments for significant capital expenditures. The Company’s Board of Directors on August 7, 1998 adopted the policy to pay an annual cash dividend, based on profitability and other factors, in the first quarter of each fiscal year, in an amount to be determined by the Board. The Company paid a $0.25 per share cash dividend in June 2006.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Deferred Retirement Obligation

Contractual death benefits for the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who passed away on April 18, 1997 are payable by the Company in the amount of $75,000 per year for 10 years from the date of his death. As of June 30, 2006, $64,000 has been reflected as a current liability and $32,000 has been reflected as a long-term liability associated with this death benefit.

Impact of Inflation

If interest rates continue to rise, the Company believes the impact of inflation and changing prices on its revenues and net earnings could have a material effect on its manufacturing operations if the Company cannot increase prices to pass the additional costs on to its customers. Although the Company’s air cargo business can pass through the major cost components of its operations, without markup, under its current contract terms, higher rates of inflation could affect our customer’s current business plans.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for use in this report. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information

required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and that management will be timely alerted to material information required to be included in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the Commission.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during or subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

It should be noted that while the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, believe that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance, they do not expect that the disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within

the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On August 4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment Company, Global’s subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover approximately $905,000 in costs incurred by Global in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. That case has been removed to federal court and is pending before United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been assigned to the same judge before whom the U.S. Airways litigation is pending against Global. This matter is in the initial stage of discovery. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful, in this action.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

No. Description

	3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the period ended September 30, 2001


	3.2	By-laws of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996

	4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1994

	10.1	Lease Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between Little Mountain Airport Associates, Inc. and Mountain Air Cargo, Inc.


	31.1	Certification of Walter Clark

	31.2	Certification of John J. Gioffre

	32.1	Section 1350 Certification

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AIR T, INC.

By: /s/ Walter Clark

Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 3, 2006

By: /s/ John J. Gioffre

John J. Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: August 3, 2006

AIR T, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number Document

10.1	Lease Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between Little Mountain Airport Associates, Inc. and Mountain Air Cargo, Inc.
31.1	Certification of Walter Clark
31.2	Certification of John J. Gioffre
32.1	Section 1350 Certification

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

COUNTY OF CATAWBA

LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS LEASE AGREEMENT , made and entered into this 16th day of June, 2006, by and between LITTLE MOUNTAIN AIRPORT ASSOCIATES, INC. (“Lessor”) and MOUNTAIN AIR CARGO, INC. (“Lessee”):

WITNESSETH:

That for and in consideration of the rentals hereinafter reserved and the covenants and agreements herein contained, Lessor does hereby demise and lease unto Lessee, and Lessee does hereby lease from Lessor the premises (“Leased Premises”) described in the attached Exhibit A, for the rentals and on the conditions hereinafter stated.

ARTICLE I

TERM

The term of this lease shall be for a period commencing June 1, 2006 and continuing until May 31, 2008. Lessee has option to renew lease for an additional two (2) year period commencing June 1, 2008 and ending May 31, 2010.

ARTICLE II

RENTAL

Lessee shall pay to the Lessor as rental monthly installments, each in the amount of Twelve Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty-six and 79/100 Dollars ($12,736.79), payable in advance on the first day of each and every calendar month, commencing with June 2006. If Lessee exercises option to renew Lease for the additional two (2) year Lease period starting June 1, 2008, monthly rental will be adjusted to reflect the Consumer Price Index (CPI) change from June 1, 2006 to April 1, 2008.

ARTICLE III

MAINTENANCE

The maintenance of the Leased Premises shall be the sole responsibility of the Lessee, it being understood and agreed that the premises are being leased without obligation on the part of the Lessor to make repairs. And the Lessee covenants and agrees to take good care of the Leased Premises and upon the termination of this lease will surrender the said Leased Premises in as good order and condition as they now are, ordinary wear, and tear excepted.

ARTICLE IV

IMPROVEMENTS BY LESSEE

Any air conditioning, heating, plumbing, or other improvements installed in the Leased Premises by the Lessee shall become a part of the Leased Premises and Lessee shall have no right to remove same at the termination of the lease.

ARTICLE V

UTILITIES

Lessee shall pay for all utilities furnished the Leased Premises during the term of this lease.

ARTICLE VI

TAXES AND INSURANCE

Lessee shall be responsible for providing insurance on the Leased Premises and shall pay all ad valorem taxes on the Leased Premises. Lessee shall be responsible for ad valorem taxes on all equipment owned by it and placed on the Leased Premises.

ARTICLE VII

USE OF PREMISES

Lessee shall use the Leased Premises for the operation of an airport, maintenance facility, and corporate offices.

ARTICLE VIII

FORFEITURE FOR DEFAULT

It is expressly agreed that if Lessee shall neglect to make any payments of rent when due or neglect to do and perform any matter or thing herein agreed to be done and performed by it, and shall remain in default thereof for a period of fifteen (15) days after written notice from Lessor calling attention to such default, Lessor may declare the lease terminated and cancelled and take possession of said Leased Premises without prejudice to any other legal remedy it may have on account of such default. Said notice may be given to the person at such time in charge of said Leased Premises or sent by registered mail to Lessee addressed to P.O. Box 488, Denver, North Carolina, 28037.

ARTICLE IX

ASSIGNMENT

Lessee shall have no right to assign or sublease the Leased Premises without the written approval of Lessor.

ARTICLE X

SALE OF LEASED PREMISES

Lessor shall have the right to sell the Leased Premises and the lease shall continue in full force and effect.

ARTICLE XI

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This lease contains all the agreements and conditions made between the parties hereto and may not be modified orally or in any other manner than by an agreement in writing, signed by all the parties hereto or their respective successors in interest.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written.

LESSOR :

LITTLE MOUNTAIN AIRPORT ASSOCIATES, INC.

/s/ William H. Simpson

Name: William H. Simpson

Title: President

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

COUNTY OF ___ Catawba ___________

I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day, each acknowledging to me that the he or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated for LITTLE MOUNTAIN AIRPORT ASSOCIATES, INC .

William H. Simpson

( insert name(s) of those signing )

Date ____ June 16, 2006 ___________ /s/ Erlene H. Geddes

Official Signature of Notary

Erlene H. Geddes

Notary’s printed or typed name

My commission expires: ________ September 20, 2006 ____________

(Official Seal)

LESSEE :

MOUNTAIN AIR CARGO, INC.

By /s/ John Gioffre

Name: John Gioffre

Title: CFO

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

COUNTY OF ___ Catawba _____________

John Gioffre

( insert name(s) of those signing )

Date _____ June 16, 2006 _____________ /s/ Erlene H. Geddes

Official Signature of Notary

Erlene H. Geddes

Notary’s printed or typed name

My commission expires: ___ September 20, 2006 _______________

(Official Seal)

Exhibit A

1. The real property located at 1544 North Carolina Highway 16, Maiden, North Carolina, being more particularly described in Book 0915, Page 0317 of the Catawba County, North Carolina, Register of Deeds; and

2. Nonexclusive use of the runway, ramp and parking and exclusive use of the existing buildings located in Catawba County on the real property described as follows:

“BEGINNING at iron pin, Cauthen's corner, and runs from said beginning point with Cauthen's line North 20 degrees East. 75 feet to a stake, a common corner of Cauthen and Roy O. Smith, Jr.; thence with the line of Roy O. Smith, Jr.; thence with the line of Roy O. Smith, Jr. North 24 degrees 52 minutes East 1092 feet to a stake; thence South 68 degrees 8 minutes East 765 feet to a stake; thence South 24 degrees 52 minutes West 2925.7 feet to a stake; thence South 53 degrees West 350.57 feet to a stake; thence North 34 degrees West 758.03 feet to a stake; thence North 24 degrees 52 minutes East 1391.31 feet to a stake on the Northeast edge of a 60-foot road; thence North 33 degrees 58 minutes East 26.46 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 54.448 acres, in accordance with a survey prepared by Joe F. Robinson, Registered Surveyor, dated December 28, 1973.”

For a more particular description of the buildings, refer to the Appraisal by C.E. Lawing, CRA, Home Realty, Inc., dated March 17, 1980.

NORTH CAROLINA

CATAWBA COUNTY

The foregoing certificates of ______________________________, a Notary Public of Catawba County, North Carolina, are certified to be correct. This instrument was presented for registration this 20th day of June, 2006, at 04:15:04pm. M., and duly recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Catawba County, North Carolina, in Book 02759, Pages 1442-1447.

This 20th day of June, 2006.

/s/ Donna Hicks Spencer

Donna Hicks Spencer

CERTIFICATION

I, Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Air T, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independent registered public accountants and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2006

/s/ Walter Clark

Walter Clark

Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

I, John Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Air T, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2006

/s/ John J. Gioffre

John J. Gioffre

Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Air T, Inc. (the "Company") that, to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Date: August 3, 2006 /s/ Walter Clark

Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 3, 2006 /s/ John J. Gioffre

John J. Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer