STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
April 29, 2020
MIDAS SERIES TRUST
MIDAS FUND
Ticker: MIDSX
MIDAS MAGIC
Ticker: MISEX
11 Hanover Square
New York, NY 10005
1-800-400-MIDAS (6432)
This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) dated April 29, 2020 provides supplementary information pertaining to Midas Fund (“Midas Fund”) and Midas Magic (“Midas Magic”) (each, a “Fund” and together,
the “Funds”), which are separate series of Midas Series Trust (“Trust”), an open end management investment company. This SAI is not a prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Funds’ prospectus, dated April 29, 2020 (“Prospectus”).
This SAI is incorporated by reference into the Prospectus; in other words, this SAI also is legally a part of the Prospectus, which is available to prospective investors without charge upon request by calling 1-800-400-MIDAS (6432) or visiting
www.midasfunds.com.
The financial statements for each Fund and the accompanying notes and report of the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 , are included in the Annual Report to shareholders of that date and are incorporated herein by reference. The Annual Report is available without charge upon request by calling
1-800-400-MIDAS (6432) or visiting www.midasfunds.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FUND HISTORY
|
3
|
THE FUNDS’ INVESTMENT PROGRAMS
|
3
|
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
|
13
|
OPTIONS, FUTURES, AND FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACT STRATEGIES
|
15
|
FUND COMPLEX
|
22
|
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
|
22
|
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
|
26
|
CODE OF ETHICS
|
26
|
PROXY VOTING
|
27
|
DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
|
27
|
|
28
|
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
|
28
|
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
|
30
|
DISTRIBUTION OF SHARES
|
31
|
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
|
33
|
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES
|
33
|
ALLOCATION OF BROKERAGE
|
35
|
DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES
|
37
|
CAPITAL STOCK INFORMATION
|
41
|
REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS
|
42
|
CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT
|
42
|
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
42
|
APPENDIX A – SECURITIES RATINGS
|
A-1
|
APPENDIX B – PROXY VOTING
|
B-1
|
FUND HISTORY
The Trust was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on September 28, 2012. On October 15, 2012, each of the then-existing three series of the Trust became the successor to one of three Maryland
corporations (the “Predecessor Funds”), as set forth below. On June 24, 2016, Midas Perpetual Portfolio, a former series of the Trust, merged into Midas Fund.
Series
|
Formerly
|
Organized as a Maryland Corporation in
|
Midas Fund
|
Midas Fund, Inc.
|
1995
|
Midas Perpetual Portfolio
(merged into Midas Fund as of June 24, 2016)
|
Midas Perpetual Portfolio, Inc.
|
1974 (changed its name from Midas Dollar Reserves, Inc. on December 29, 2008)
|
Midas Magic
|
Midas Magic, Inc.
|
1986 (changed its name from Midas Special Fund, Inc. on April 29, 2011)
|
THE FUNDS’ INVESTMENT PROGRAMS
Each Fund is a series of the Trust, a non-diversified open end management investment company.
Investments and Investment Practices
Concentration. Midas Fund concentrates its investments by investing at least 25% of its total assets in securities of companies primarily involved, directly or indirectly, in
the business of mining, processing, fabricating, distributing or otherwise dealing in gold, silver, platinum or other natural resources (“Natural Resources Companies”). As such, Midas Fund is subject to industry concentration risk, which is the
risk that the Fund’s performance can be significantly affected by the developments in the Natural Resource industry.
Natural Resources Companies and Precious Metals Investing. Midas Fund is subject to the special risks associated with investing in Natural Resources Companies, gold and silver
bullion, and other precious metals, including (i) the price of gold, silver, or other precious metals may be subject to wide fluctuation; (ii) the market for gold, silver, or other precious metals is relatively limited; (iii) the sources of gold,
silver, or other precious metals are concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and (iv) the market for gold, silver, and other precious metals is unregulated.
Natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals have at times been subject to substantial price fluctuations over short periods of time and may be affected by unpredictable monetary and
political policies such as currency devaluations or revaluations, economic and social conditions within a country, trade imbalances, or trade or currency restrictions between countries. The prices of natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and
other precious metals, however, are less subject to local and company specific factors than securities of individual companies. As a result, natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals may be more or less volatile in
price than securities of companies engaged in precious metals related businesses. Investments in natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals can present concerns such as delivery, storage, and maintenance, possible
illiquidity, and the unavailability of accurate market valuations. The Fund may incur higher custody and transaction costs for natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals than for securities. Also, natural resources,
gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals investments do not pay income.
The majority of producers of natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and other precious metals are domiciled in a limited number of countries. Economic and political conditions in those countries may have a
direct effect on the production and marketing of natural resources, gold and silver bullion, and on sales of central bank holdings of such, if any.
Resource mining by its nature involves significant risks and hazards. Even when a resource mineralization is discovered, there is no guarantee that economically minable reserves will result. Mining exploration can
last over a number of years, incur substantial costs, and not lead to any new commercial mining. Resource mining runs the risk of increased environmental, labor or other costs in mining due to environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labor
disputes, discharge of toxic chemicals, fire, drought, flooding, and other natural acts. Changes in laws relating to mining or resource production or sales could also substantially affect resource values.
Midas Fund is also subject to the risk that it may fail to qualify as a “regulated investment company” (“RIC”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), if it derives more than 10% of its gross
income in any taxable year from investments in gold, silver or platinum bullion or coins or other precious metals and certain other non-securities related sources. Failure of the Fund to qualify as a RIC
may result in adverse tax consequences to the Fund and its shareholders unless the Fund was able to, and did, avail itself of certain relief provisions in the Code. See "Distributions and Taxes". In order to ensure
that it continues to qualify as a RIC, the Fund may be required to make investment decisions that are less than optimal or forego the opportunity to realize gains on precious metals.
Climate Change. Midas Fund is subject to the special risks associated with climate change. Weather may play a role in the cash flows of the Natural Resources Companies in
which Midas Fund invests. Although many of the companies in this sector can reasonably predict seasonal weather patterns, extreme weather conditions, such as those that may result from climate change, many be unpredictable. The damage done by
extreme weather could adversely affect the financial conditions of Natural Resource Companies.
In December 2015, the United Nations, of which the U.S. is a member, adopted a climate accord (the “Paris Agreement”) with the long-term goal of limiting global warming and the short-term goal of significantly
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. subsequently ratified the Paris Agreement and it entered into force on November 4, 2016. As a result, Natural Resource Companies may be subject to new or strengthened regulations or legislation which
could increase their operating costs and/or decrease their revenues. More recently, the new President indicated that the U.S. will withdraw from the Paris Agreement. However, the decision will not be made official until 2020 due to a mandatory
waiting period, leaving open the possibility that the decision may be reversed. The impact of any such withdrawal on Natural Resource Companies, and the financial markets generally, remains unclear.
Equity Securities. Each Fund may invest in equity securities of U.S. and foreign issuers that, in the judgment of Midas Management Corporation (the “Investment Manager”),
offer attractive potential to such Fund to reach its investment objective. Equity securities are subordinate to debt securities and generally are more volatile than debt securities and more vulnerable to changes in economic and industry conditions
and in the financial conditions of the issuers of such securities.
While past performance does not guarantee future results, equity securities historically have provided the greatest long term growth potential in a company. Common stocks generally represent the riskiest investment
in a company. Even investments in high quality or “blue chip” equity securities or securities of established companies with large market capitalizations (which generally have strong financial characteristics) can be negatively impacted by poor
economic conditions. It is possible that a Fund may experience a substantial or complete loss on an individual equity investment. While this is also possible with bonds, it is less likely.
Foreign Securities and Emerging Markets. Because each Fund may invest in foreign securities, either directly or through other issuers who invest in foreign securities,
investment in a Fund may involve investment risks of adverse political and economic developments that are different from an investment in a fund that invests only in the securities of U.S. issuers. Such risks may include adverse movements in the
market value of foreign securities during days on which a Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) is not determined, the possible imposition of withholding taxes by foreign governments on dividend or interest income payable on the securities held in a
Fund’s portfolio, the possible seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits, the possible establishment of exchange controls and the adoption of other foreign governmental restrictions that might adversely affect the payment of dividends or
principal and interest on securities in a Fund’s portfolio.
Securities of many foreign issuers may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable domestic issuers, and some foreign securities markets may trade a smaller number of securities or may be
held by a relatively small number of persons or institutions. In addition, with respect to certain foreign countries, there is the possibility of expropriation, confiscatory taxation, and limitations on the use or removal of funds or other
assets. Because certain foreign entities are not subject to uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable with those applicable to U.S. companies, there may be different types of, and lower
quality, information available about a non-U.S. company than a U.S. company.
The costs associated with investment in foreign issuers, including withholding taxes, brokerage commissions, and custodial fees, are higher than those associated with investment in domestic issuers. Further, certain
foreign markets may require payment for securities before delivery. Foreign securities transactions also may be subject to difficulties associated with the settlement of such transactions, including extended clearance and settlement periods.
Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when assets of a Fund are uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of a Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause a Fund to miss
attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of a portfolio security due to settlement problems could result in losses to a Fund due to subsequent declines in value of the portfolio security or, if a Fund has entered into a contract
to sell the security, could result in liability to the purchaser.
Each Fund may invest in foreign securities by purchasing American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depository Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) and International Depository Receipts
(“IDRs”). ADRs (sponsored or unsponsored) are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Most ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and are traded on a U.S. stock
exchange. However, they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying securities are denominated in foreign currency. EDRs and IDRs are receipts typically issued by a European bank
or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. GDRs are receipts issued by either a U.S. or non-U.S. banking institution evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in
U.S. dollars. Issuers of the securities underlying sponsored depositary receipts, but not unsponsored depositary receipts, are contractually
obligated to disclose material information in the United States. Therefore, the market value of unsponsored depositary receipts is less likely to reflect the effect of such information.
The United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020 following a June 2016 referendum referred to as “Brexit.” Upon the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU, the United Kingdom entered a
transition period until December 31, 2020 during which time a trade deal and other key agreements will be negotiated. Though the ramifications of Brexit will not be fully known for some time, the uncertainty surrounding the United Kingdom’s
economy, and its legal, political, and economic relationship with the remaining member states of the EU, may cause considerable disruption in securities markets, including decreased liquidity and increased volatility, as well as currency
fluctuations in the British pound’s exchange rate against the U.S. dollar.
The risks of investment in foreign securities are greater for investments in emerging markets. Many emerging market countries can experience substantial, and in some periods extremely high, rates of inflation.
Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had, and may continue to have, very negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging markets. Economies in emerging markets generally are dependent upon
international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be affected adversely by economic conditions, trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or
negotiated by the countries with which they trade.
Because of the high levels of foreign denominated debt owed by many emerging market countries, fluctuating exchange rates can significantly affect the debt service obligations of those countries. This could, in
turn, affect local interest rates, profit margins and exports that are a major source of foreign exchange earnings. Although it might be theoretically possible to hedge for anticipated income and gains, the ongoing and indeterminate nature of the
foregoing risks (and the costs associated with hedging transactions) makes it virtually impossible to hedge effectively against such risks.
To the extent an emerging market country faces a liquidity crisis with respect to its foreign exchange reserves, it may increase restrictions on the outflow of any foreign exchange. Repatriation is ultimately
dependent on the ability of a Fund to liquidate its investments and convert the local currency proceeds obtained from such liquidation into U.S. dollars. Where this conversion must be done through official channels (usually the central bank or
certain authorized commercial banks), the ability to obtain U.S. dollars is dependent on the availability of such U.S. dollars through those channels and, if available, upon the willingness of those channels to allocate those U.S. dollars to a
Fund. In such a case, a Fund’s ability to obtain U.S. dollars may be adversely affected by any increased restrictions imposed on the outflow of foreign exchange. If a Fund is unable to repatriate any amounts due to exchange controls, it may be
required to accept an obligation payable at some future date by the central bank or other governmental entity of the jurisdiction involved. If such conversion can legally be done outside official channels, either directly or indirectly, a Fund’s
ability to obtain U.S. dollars may not be affected as much by any increased restrictions except to the extent of the price that may be required to be paid for the U.S. dollars.
The securities markets of emerging markets are substantially smaller, less developed, less liquid and more volatile than the securities markets of the United States and other more developed countries. In many
respects, disclosure and regulatory standards are less stringent than in the United States and other major markets. There also may be a lower level of monitoring and regulation of emerging markets and the activities of investors in such
markets; enforcement of existing regulations has been extremely limited. Investing in the securities of companies in emerging markets may entail special risks relating to the potential political and economic instability and the risks of
expropriation, nationalization, confiscation or the imposition of restrictions on foreign investment, convertibility of currencies into U.S. dollars and on repatriation of capital invested. In the event of such expropriation, nationalization or
other confiscation by any country, a Fund could lose its entire investment in any such country.
Many emerging market countries have little experience with the corporate form of business organization and may not have well developed corporation and business laws, concepts of fiduciary duty in the business
context, or anti-fraud and anti-insider trading legislation. As such, minority shareholders may have little protection if management takes action that has an adverse impact on the securities in which a Fund invests. Some emerging markets have
different settlement and clearance procedures. In certain markets there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. The risk also
exists that an emergency situation may arise in one or more emerging markets as a result of which trading of securities may cease or may be curtailed and prices for a Fund’s portfolio securities in such markets may not be readily available.
In addition to the risks discussed above, a Fund’s investments in other issuers that invest in emerging markets securities, including exchange traded funds or exchange traded grantor trusts (collectively, “ETFs”),
registered and unregistered investment companies, and hedge funds, may be subject to additional risks. Certain emerging market countries require government approval prior to investments by foreign persons in a particular issuer, limit the amount
of investment by foreign persons in a particular issuer and may have less advantageous rights than the classes available for purchase by residents of the countries. These investments are also subject to risks due to the inexperience of financial
intermediaries, the lack of modern technology in the foreign market, and the possibility of temporary or permanent termination of trading. Because the ETFs, registered and unregistered investment companies, and hedge funds in which a Fund may
invest may not hedge against foreign currency risks, including the risk of changing currency exchange rates, the value of foreign currency denominated portfolio securities may be reduced irrespective of the underlying investment.
U.S. Government Securities. The obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government in
which a Fund may invest include direct obligations of the United States Department of the Treasury (“U.S. Treasury”) and obligations issued by U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities. Included among direct obligations of the United States
are Treasury Bills, Treasury Notes and Treasury Bonds, which differ in terms of their interest rates, maturities and dates of issuance. Treasury Bills have maturities of less than one year, Treasury Notes have maturities of one to 10 years and
Treasury Bonds generally have maturities of greater than 10 years at the date of issuance. Included among the obligations issued by agencies and instrumentalities and government-sponsored enterprises of the United States are instruments that are
supported by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as certificates issued by Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”)), instruments that are supported by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury (such
as securities of Federal Home Loan Banks), and instruments that are supported only by the credit of the instrumentality (such as Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”)
bonds). As a result of market influences, yields of short term U.S. Treasury debt instruments are near historical lows.
Other U.S. government securities in which a Fund may invest include securities issued or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, Farmers Home Loan Administration, Export-Import Bank of the United States,
Small Business Administration, General Services Administration, Central Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Farm Credit Banks, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Federal Land Banks, Maritime Administration, Tennessee Valley Authority, District of
Columbia Armory Board and Student Loan Marketing Association. A Fund may invest in instruments that are supported by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury and instruments that are supported solely by the credit of the
instrumentality or enterprise.
Historically, U.S. government securities have not been perceived to involve the general credit risks associated with investments in other types of debt securities and, as a result, the yields available from U.S.
government securities are generally lower than the yields available from other debt securities. Like other debt securities, however, the values of U.S. government securities change as interest rates fluctuate. Fluctuations in the value of these
portfolio securities will not affect interest income on existing portfolio securities but will be reflected in a Fund’s NAV.
With respect to U.S. government securities backed solely by the issuing or guaranteeing agency or instrumentality itself, the investor must look principally to that agency or instrumentality for ultimate repayment,
which agency or instrumentality may be privately owned. There can be no assurance that the U.S. government would provide financial support to its agencies or instrumentalities (including government-sponsored enterprises) where it is not obligated
to so do. As a result, there is a risk that these entities will default on a financial obligation.
Fixed Income Securities. Each Fund may invest in fixed income securities which can be subject to default risk, that is, the risk that the issuer’s promise to make payment will
not be kept. The Investment Manager attempts to reduce this risk to a low level by purchasing high grade dollar assets including, but not limited to, U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds, U.S. government agency and instrumentality securities, and
debt obligations of corporations with a Standard & Poor Global’s (“S&P”) rating of “A” or higher. Long term dollar assets, and, to a lesser extent, short term dollar assets, are subject to the risk of rising interest rates. As rates rise,
as they tend to do during periods of rising inflation, the market values of dollar assets decline. The degree to which a Fund, through its dollar assets, is exposed to the risk of rising interest rates can be measured by the average length to
maturity of its net dollar assets (the amount of its dollar assets reduced by any outstanding borrowings). The greater the average length to maturity, the greater the risk.
The Federal Reserve began raising the federal funds rate in 2016. There is uncertainty regarding whether the Federal Reserve will continue to raise the federal funds rate, and if so, how quickly, as well as how the
financial markets will react. If the Federal Reserve continues to raise the federal funds rate, there is a risk that interest rates will rise. Market developments and other factors, including a general rise in interest rates, have the potential to
cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which may increase redemptions from mutual funds that hold large amounts of fixed income securities. Such a move, coupled with a reduction in the ability or willingness of
dealers and other institutional investors to buy or hold fixed income securities, may result in decreased liquidity and increased volatility in the fixed income markets.
Swiss Franc Assets. The Swiss franc is subject to the risk that inflation (either actual or expected) will decrease in the United States or rise in Switzerland. The price of
the Swiss franc is also subject to the imposition of exchange controls; to manipulation by the Federal Reserve System, the Swiss National Bank and, to a lesser extent, by other Swiss central banks and official agencies; and to investment controls
established by the Swiss or U.S. government. While Switzerland has historically been a politically stable nation, there is no assurance that the country may not become subject to the risks associated with investments in foreign securities as
described above.
Real Estate Company Securities. Investments in real estate company stocks category are generally common stocks, but a Fund may acquire preferred stocks of U.S. and foreign
companies, shares of beneficial interest in real estate investment trusts, and ADRs, EDRs, and GDRs on stocks within this category.
Investments in securities of issuers engaged in the real estate industry entail special risks and considerations. In particular, securities of such issuers may be subject to risks associated with the direct ownership
of real estate. These risks include: the cyclical nature of real estate values, including the decline in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, overbuilding and increased competition, increases in property
taxes and operating expenses, demographic trends and variations in rental income, changes in zoning
laws, casualty or condemnation losses, environmental risks, regulatory limitations on rents, changes in neighborhood values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, increases in interest rates and other real
estate capital market influences. To the extent that assets underlying a Fund’s investments are concentrated geographically, by property type or in certain other respects, the Fund may be subject to certain of the foregoing risks to a greater
extent. Generally, increases in interest rates will increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could directly and indirectly decrease the value of the Funds’ investments.
Small Capitalization. Each Fund may invest in companies that are small or thinly capitalized and may have a limited operating history. Investments in small-cap companies may
involve greater risks than investments in larger, more established issuers because they generally are more vulnerable than stocks of larger companies to adverse business or economic developments. The securities of small capitalization companies
generally are less liquid and have narrower product lines, more limited financial resources, and more limited markets for their stock as compared with larger companies. As a result, the value of such securities may be more volatile than the
securities of larger companies. During broad market downturns, a Fund’s net asset value may fall further than those of funds investing in larger companies. Full development of small capitalization companies takes time, and for this reason, among
others, a Fund should be considered a long term investment and not a vehicle for seeking short term profit.
Convertible Securities. Each Fund may invest in convertible securities which include corporate bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stocks, and other securities that entitle
the holder to acquire common stock or other equity securities of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Convertible securities have general characteristics similar to both debt and equity
securities. A convertible security generally entitles the holder to receive interest or preferred dividends paid or accrued until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted, or exchanged. Convertible securities generally rank
senior to common stock in a corporation’s capital structure and, therefore, generally entail less risk than the corporation’s common stock, although the extent to which such risk is reduced depends in large measure upon the degree to which the
convertible security sells above its value as a debt obligation. Convertible securities are generally convertible either at a stated price or a stated rate (that is, for a specific number of shares of common stock or other security).
Before conversion, convertible securities have characteristics similar to non-convertible obligations. The price of a convertible security to some extent varies inversely with interest rates. While providing a
fixed income stream (generally higher in yield than the income derivable from a common stock but lower than that afforded by a non-convertible debt security), a convertible security also provides an opportunity, through its conversion feature, to
participate in the capital appreciation of the common stock or other equity security into which it is convertible. As the market price of the underlying equity security declines, convertible securities tend to trade increasingly on a yield basis
and so may not experience market value declines to the same extent as the underlying equity security. When the market price of the underlying equity security increases, the price of a convertible security tends to rise as a reflection of the value
of the underlying equity security. To obtain the higher yield, to the extent a Fund invests in convertible securities, it may be required to pay a purchase amount in excess of the value of the underlying equity security. While no securities
investment is without some risk, investments in convertible securities generally entail less risk than the issuer’s common stock. However, the extent to which such risk is reduced depends in large measure upon the degree to which the convertible
security sells above its value as a fixed income security.
A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by a Fund is called for
redemption, the Fund will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. Certain convertible debt securities may provide a put option to the holder, which entitles the
holder to cause the security to be redeemed by the issuer at a premium over the stated principal amount of the debt security under certain circumstances.
Preferred Stocks. Each Fund may invest in preferred stocks of U.S. and foreign issuers that, in the Investment Manager’s judgment, offer potential for growth of capital and
income. Preferred stock represents an equity ownership interest in a corporation, but generally entitles the holder to receive, in preference to the holders of other stocks such as common stocks, dividends and a fixed share of the proceeds
resulting from liquidation of the company. Preferred stock is subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, in the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of
the issuer’s bonds take precedence over the claims of owners of the issuer’s preferred and common stock. Some preferred stock also entitles their holders to receive additional liquidation proceeds on the same basis as holders of a company’s common
stock. Some preferred stock offers a fixed rate of return with no maturity date. Preferred stock with no maturity may perform similarly to long term bonds, and can be more volatile than other types of preferred stock with heightened sensitivity
to changes in interest rates. Other preferred stock has a variable dividend, generally determined on a quarterly or other periodic basis. Because preferred stock represents an equity ownership interest in a company, its value usually will react
more strongly than bonds and other debt instruments to actual or perceived changes in a company’s financial condition or prospects or to fluctuations in the equity markets. Preferred stock of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse
developments than preferred stock of larger companies. If interest rates rise, the specified dividend on preferred stocks may be less attractive, causing the price of such stocks to decline. The value of preferred stocks is sensitive to changes in
interest rates and to changes in the issuer’s credit quality. Unlike common stock, preferred stock does not usually have voting rights absent the occurrence of specified events; preferred stock, in some instances, is convertible into common stock.
In order to be payable, dividends on preferred stock must be declared by the issuer’s board of directors. There is, however, no assurance that dividends will be declared by the boards of directors of issuers of the preferred stocks in which a Fund
invests.
Lower Rated Debt Securities. Each Fund may invest in investment grade and below investment grade securities. Midas Fund may invest up to 35% of its total assets and Midas Magic
may invest up to 100% of its total assets in unrated debt securities or debt securities rated below investment grade, although neither Fund currently intends to invest more than 5% of its total assets in such securities. Below investment grade
securities are commonly referred to as “junk bonds.” Below investment grade securities are regarded as being predominantly speculative as to the issuer’s ability to make payments of principal and interest. Below investment grade securities
generally offer a higher current yield than that available for investment grade securities; however, risks associated with acquiring the securities of such issuers generally are greater than is the case with higher rated securities. For example,
during an economic downturn or a sustained period of rising interest rates, issuers of below investment grade securities may be more likely to experience financial stress, especially if such issuers are highly leveraged. During periods of economic
downturn, such issuers may not have sufficient revenues to meet their interest payment obligations. The issuer’s ability to service its debt obligations also may be adversely affected by specific issuer developments, the issuer’s inability to meet
specific projected business forecasts, or the unavailability of additional financing. Therefore, there can be no assurance that in the future there will not exist a higher default rate relative to the rates currently existing in the market for
below investment grade securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for the holders of below investment grade securities because such securities may be unsecured and may be subordinate to other creditors of the
issuer. The below investment grade securities in which a Fund may invest do not normally include instruments which, at the time of investment, are in default or the issuers of which are in bankruptcy. There can be no assurance, however, that such
events will not occur after a Fund purchases a particular security, in which case a Fund may experience losses and incur costs. Below investment grade securities frequently have call or redemption features that would permit an issuer to repurchase
the security from the Fund. If a call were exercised by the issuer during a period of declining interest rates, a Fund may have to replace such called security with a lower yielding security, thus decreasing the net investment income to the Fund
and dividends to stockholders.
Below investment grade securities have been in the past, and may again in the future be, more volatile and less liquid than higher rated fixed income securities, so that adverse economic events may have a greater
impact on the prices of below investment grade securities than on higher rated fixed income securities. Factors adversely affecting the market value of such securities are likely to affect adversely a Fund’s NAV.
Like higher rated fixed income securities, below investment grade securities generally are purchased and sold through dealers who make a market in such securities for their own accounts. However, there are fewer
dealers in the below investment grade securities market, which market may be less liquid than the market for higher rated fixed income securities, even under normal economic conditions. Also, there may be significant disparities in the prices
quoted for below investment grade securities by various dealers. As a result, during periods of high demand in the below investment grade securities market, it may be difficult to acquire below investment grade securities appropriate for
investment by a Fund. Adverse economic conditions and investor perceptions thereof (whether or not based on economic reality) may impair liquidity in the below investment grade securities market and may cause the prices a Fund receives for its
below investment grade securities to be reduced. In addition, a Fund may experience difficulty in liquidating a portion of its portfolio when necessary to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event such as
deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers. Under such conditions, judgment may play a greater role in valuing certain of a Fund’s portfolio instruments than in the case of instruments trading in a more liquid market. In addition, a
Fund may incur additional expense to the extent that it is required to seek recovery upon a default on a portfolio holding or to participate in the restructuring of the obligation.
Prices for junk bonds also may be affected by legislative and regulatory developments. For example, from time to time, Congress has considered legislation to restrict or eliminate the corporate tax deduction for
interest payments or to regulate corporate restructuring such as takeovers, mergers or leveraged buyouts. Tax reform legislation enacted in 2017 generally limited the business interest deduction to 30% of adjusted taxable income plus the business
interest income of the taxpayer. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act temporarily and retroactively increases this limit to 50% for taxable years beginning in 2019 and 2020. Any additional legislation, if enacted,
could depress the prices of outstanding junk bonds.
Credit ratings are determined by credit rating agencies such as S&P, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. Any shortcomings or inefficiencies in credit rating agencies’ processes
for determining credit ratings may adversely affect the credit ratings of securities held by a Fund and, as a result, may adversely affect those securities’ perceived or actual credit risk.
Ratings of investment grade or better include the four highest ratings of S&P (AAA, AA, A, or BBB), Moody’s (Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa), and Fitch (AAA, AA, A, or BBB). Moody’s considers securities rated Baa to have
speculative characteristics. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity for such securities to make principal and interest payments than is the case for higher grade debt securities. Debt
securities rated below investment grade are deemed by these rating agencies to be predominantly speculative with respect to the issuers’ capacity to pay interest and repay principal and may involve major risk exposure to adverse conditions. Debt
securities rated lower than B may include securities that are in default or face the risk of default with respect to principal or interest.
Ratings of debt securities represent the rating agencies’ opinions regarding their quality, are not a guarantee of quality and may be reduced after a Fund has acquired the security. The Investment Manager may
consider such an event in determining whether a Fund should
continue to hold the security but is not required to dispose of it. Credit ratings attempt to evaluate the safety of principal and interest payments and do not evaluate the risks of fluctuations in market value.
Also, rating agencies may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings in response to subsequent events, so that an issuer’s current financial condition may be better or worse than the rating indicates. See Appendix A to this SAI for further
information regarding S&P’s, Moody’s, and Fitch’s ratings.
Municipal Securities. Each Fund may invest without limit in municipal securities of varying maturities. The municipal securities in which a Fund may invest include general
obligation and revenue or special obligation securities. General obligation securities are secured by an issuer’s pledge of its full faith, credit, and unlimited taxing power for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue or special
obligations securities are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facility or project or, in a few cases, from the proceeds of a special excise or other tax. Municipal securities also include private activity
bonds (“PABs”). Dividends paid by a Fund attributable to municipal interest may be fully taxable to Fund shareholders unless at least 50% of a Fund’s total assets at the close of each quarter of its taxable year consists of qualifying municipal
obligations. See Appendix A to this SAI for further information regarding municipal securities ratings.
Repurchase Agreements. Each Fund may enter into repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is a transaction in which a Fund purchases securities or other obligations from
a bank or securities dealer (or its affiliate) and simultaneously commits to resell them to a counterparty at an agreed-upon date or upon demand and at a price reflecting a market rate of interest unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the
purchased obligations. The difference between the total amount to be received upon repurchase of the obligations and the price that was paid by a Fund upon acquisition is accrued as interest and included in the Fund’s net investment income.
Repurchase agreements generally result in a fixed rate of return insulated from market fluctuation during the holding period, and generally are used as a means of earning a return on cash reserves for periods as short as overnight. The securities
are held for a Fund by a custodian bank as collateral until resold and may be supplemented by additional collateral if necessary to maintain a total value equal to or in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement. Repurchase agreements carry
certain risks, including risks that are not associated with direct investments in securities. If a seller under a repurchase agreement were to default on the agreement and be unable to repurchase the security subject to the repurchase agreement,
the Fund would look to the collateral underlying the seller’s repurchase agreement, including the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement, for satisfaction of the seller’s obligation to the Fund. A Fund’s right to
liquidate the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement in the event of a default by the seller could involve certain costs and delays and, to the extent that proceeds from any sale upon a default of the obligation to
repurchase are less than the repurchase price (e.g., due to transactions costs or a decline in the value of the collateral), the Fund could suffer a loss. In addition, if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced
with respect to the seller, realization of the collateral may be delayed or limited and a loss may be incurred. Repurchase agreements involving obligations other than U.S. government securities (such as commercial paper and corporate bonds) may be
subject to special risks and may not have the benefit of certain protections in the event of the counterparty’s insolvency.
Repurchase agreements are usually for a term of one week or less, but may be for longer periods. Repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days may be considered illiquid. A Fund normally will not enter
into repurchase agreements of more than seven days’ duration if more than 15% of its net assets would be invested in such agreements and other illiquid investments.
Borrowing. Each Fund may borrow money to the extent permitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), which permits an investment company to borrow
in an amount up to 33 1/3% of the value of its total assets. Each Fund may incur overdrafts at its custodian bank from time to time in connection with redemptions and/or the purchase of portfolio securities or for any other purpose. In lieu of
paying interest to the custodian bank, a Fund may maintain equivalent cash balances prior or subsequent to incurring such overdrafts. If cash balances exceed such overdrafts, the custodian bank may credit interest thereon against fees. Effective
June 18, 2018, the Funds entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement and other related agreements (collectively, as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) with the Funds’ custodian, The
Huntington National Bank (“HNB” or “Custodian”), under which HNB may make loans to the Funds in such amounts as the Funds may from time to time request. The maximum loan amount under the Credit Agreement is the lesser of: (i) $ 5 ,000,000 for
Midas Fund and $4,000,000 for Midas Magic, or (ii) 30% of a Fund’s daily market value, which market value may be decreased by the exclusion of certain Fund assets or asset classes, as HNB may decide from time to time in its sole discretion. Each
Fund pledges its securities and other assets as collateral to secure its obligations under the Credit Agreement and each Fund retains the risks and rewards of the ownership of such securities and other assets pledged.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear an interest rate per annum to be applied to the principal balance outstanding, from time to time, equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.20%. An unused
fee is charged equal to 0.125% per annum of the daily excess of the loan amount over the outstanding principal balance of the loan. The Funds were charged an origination fee of $ 6,250 for Midas Fund and $5,000 for Midas Magic upon entering
into the Credit Agreement and such costs are amortized ratably through May 30, 2020, the maturity date of the Credit Agreement.
Securities Lending. In addition to the Credit Agreement with HNB, each Fund may lend portfolio securities or other assets for a fee to brokers, dealers, and other financial
institutions. A Fund continues to receive the equivalent of the interest, dividends or other distributions paid by the issuer on the securities loaned as well as the benefit of any increase and the detriment of any decrease in the market value of
the securities loaned and also has the opportunity to earn interest on the amount of the loan and on the loaned securities’ collateral. A Fund would have the right to call the loan and obtain the securities loaned at any time. A Fund would not
have the right to
vote the securities during the existence of the loan but would call the loan to permit voting of the securities, if, in the Investment Manager’s judgment, a material event requiring a stockholder vote would otherwise
occur before the loan was repaid. The loan would be continuously secured by collateral consisting of cash, securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, bank letters of credit, or any combination
thereof, at all times equal to at least the market value of the assets loaned. Including such collateral as part of a Fund’s total assets, normally at no time will the value of assets loaned by a Fund exceed one-third of a Fund’s total assets
(reduced by any amount that is rehypothecated as discussed above). In connection with its securities lending transactions, a Fund may return to the borrower or a third party which is acting as a “lending agent,” a part of the income earned from
the investment of collateral received for securities loaned. There are risks to a Fund of delay in receiving additional collateral and risks of delay in recovery of, and failure to recover, the assets loaned should the borrower fail financially or
otherwise violate the terms of the lending agreement. In the event of bankruptcy or other default of the borrower, a Fund could experience both delays in liquidating the loan collateral or recovering the loaned securities and losses, including
(a) possible decline in the value of the collateral or in the value of the securities loaned during the period while a Fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto, (b) possible subnormal levels of income and lack of access to income during this
period, and (c) expenses of enforcing its rights. A Fund may also experience losses as a result of the diminution in value of its cash collateral investments. Any loan made by a Fund will typically provide that it may be terminated by either
party upon reasonable notice to the other party. By lending its portfolio securities, a Fund attempts to increase its income through the receipt of income on the loan. The Funds do not use affiliated agents in managing the lending program.
The dollar amounts of income and fees/compensation related to the securities lending activities of each Fund during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows:
|
Midas Fund
|
Midas Magic
|
(i) Gross income from securities lending activities, including income from cash collateral reinvestment
|
$0
|
$0
|
(ii) Fees and/or compensation for each of the following securities lending activities and related services:
|
|
|
Share of revenue generated by the securities lending program paid to the securities lending agent(s) (“revenue split”)
|
$0
|
$0
|
Fees paid for cash collateral management services (including fees deducted from a pooled cash collateral reinvestment vehicle) that are not included in the revenue split
|
$0
|
$0
|
Administrative fees that are not included in the revenue split
|
$0
|
$0
|
Fees for indemnification that are not included in the revenue split
|
$0
|
$0
|
Rebates paid to borrowers
|
$0
|
$0
|
Other fees relating to the securities lending program that are not included in the revenue split
|
$0
|
$0
|
(iii) The aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities set forth in item (ii)
|
$0
|
$0
|
(iv) Net income from securities lending activities (i.e., the dollar amount in item (i) minus the dollar amount in item (iii))
|
$0
|
$0
|
A description of the services provided to the Funds’ by the securities lending agent, if any, is set forth under “Borrowing” above.
Short Sales. Each Fund may engage in short sales transactions. A “short sale” is the sale by a Fund of a security which has been borrowed from a third party on the expectation
that the market price will drop. The Funds may use short sales in an attempt to realize gain or for hedging purposes. To complete such a transaction, a Fund must borrow the security to make delivery to the buyer. A Fund then is obligated to
replace the security borrowed by purchasing the security at the market price at the time of replacement. The price at such time may be more or less than the price at which the security was sold by a Fund. Until the security is replaced, a Fund is
required to pay to the lender amounts equal to any dividends or interest which accrue during the period of the loan. To borrow the security, a Fund also may be required to pay a premium, which would increase the cost of the security sold. The
proceeds of the short sale normally will be retained by the counterparty, to the extent necessary to meet the margin requirements, or by the Fund’s Custodian until the short position is closed
out. Until the Fund closes its short position or replaces the borrowed security, a Fund normally will: (a) segregate cash or liquid securities at such a level that the segregated amount plus the amount deposited
with the counterparty or the Fund’s Custodian as collateral (i) will equal the current value of the security sold short and (ii) will not be less than the market value of the security at the time the security was sold short; or
(b) otherwise cover the Fund’s short position. Each Fund may sell short up to 100% of its net assets, but neither Fund currently intends to sell short more than 40% of its assets. The Funds will incur transaction costs in effecting short sales.
A Fund will realize a gain if the security declines in price between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund replaces the borrowed security. A Fund will incur a loss if the price of the security
increases between those dates. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss increased, by the amount of any premium or interest the Fund is required to pay in connection with the short sale. A short position may be
adversely affected by imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the securities sold short and the securities being hedged. The effect of short selling is similar to the effect of leverage. Short selling may amplify changes in a
Fund’s NAV. Short selling may also produce higher than normal portfolio turnover, which may result in increased transaction costs to a Fund. The Funds’ ability to engage in short sales may be impaired by any temporary prohibitions on short
selling imposed by domestic and certain foreign government regulators.
ETFs. Each Fund may invest in shares of ETFs, which are designed to provide investment results generally corresponding to a securities or commodities index. ETFs usually are
units of beneficial interest in an investment trust or represent undivided ownership interests in a portfolio of securities. Most ETFs are designed to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the
component securities of the benchmark index that they seek to track, although some are actively managed. ETFs do not sell individual shares directly to investors and only issue their shares in large blocks known as “creation units.” The investor
purchasing a creation unit may sell the individual shares on a secondary market. Therefore, the liquidity of ETFs depends on the adequacy of the secondary market.
An investment in an ETF involves risks similar to investing directly in the component securities of the ETF, including the risk that the value of the component securities may fluctuate in accordance with changes in
the financial condition of their issuers, the value of stocks and other securities generally, and other market factors. Investments in ETFs that are designed to correspond to an equity index involve certain inherent risks generally associated with
investments in a broadly based portfolio of common stocks, including the risk that the general level of stock prices may decline, thereby adversely affecting the value of ETFs invested in by the Fund. There can be no assurance that an ETF’s
investment objective will be achieved, as ETFs based on an index may not replicate and maintain exactly the composition and relative weightings of securities in the index.
Typically, ETFs bear their own operational expenses, reducing its NAV and dividends potentially payable to investors. To the extent that the Fund invests in ETFs, the Fund’s stockholders will indirectly bear a pro rata share of the ETF’s expenses in addition to the expenses associated with an investment in the Fund. Typically, ETFs are investment companies. However, the term is used in the industry in broad way to
include securities issued by entities that are not investment companies. To the extent an ETF is an investment company, the limitations applicable to the Fund’s ability to purchase securities issued by other investment companies will apply.
Illiquid Assets. No Fund may purchase or otherwise acquire any security or invest in a repurchase agreement if, as a result, more than 15% of its net assets would be invested
in illiquid assets, including repurchase agreements not entitling the holder to payment of principal within seven days. Illiquid investments are investments that a Fund reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market
conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the security . In the absence of market quotations, illiquid investments are priced at fair value as
determined in good faith by the Investment Manager’s Valuation Committee pursuant to guidelines approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (“Board of Trustees” or “Board”). Illiquid securities may be difficult to dispose of at a fair price at the
times when a Fund believes it is desirable to do so. The market price of illiquid securities generally is more volatile than that of more liquid securities, which may adversely affect the price that a Fund pays for or recovers upon the sale of
illiquid securities. Illiquid securities are also more difficult to value and thus the Investment Manager’s judgment plays a greater role in the valuation process. Investment of a Fund’s assets in illiquid securities may restrict a Fund’s ability
to take advantage of market opportunities. The risks associated with illiquid securities may be particularly acute in situations in which a Fund’s operations require cash and could result in a Fund borrowing to meet its short term needs or
incurring losses on the sale of illiquid securities.
Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”), or in a registered public
offering. Where registration is required, a Fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a
security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, a Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.
A large institutional market exists for certain securities that are not registered under the 1933 Act, including private placements, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, foreign securities and corporate bonds and
notes. These instruments are often restricted securities because the securities are either themselves exempt from registration or sold in transactions not requiring registration. Institutional investors generally will not seek to sell these
instruments to the general public but instead will often depend on an efficient institutional market in which such unregistered securities can be readily resold or on an issuer’s ability to honor a demand for repayment. Therefore, the fact that
there are contractual or legal restrictions on resale to the general public or certain institutions is not dispositive of the liquidity of such investments. Rule 144A under the 1933 Act establishes a “safe harbor” from the registration
requirements of the 1933 Act for resales of certain securities to qualified institutional buyers. An insufficient number of qualified institutional buyers interested in purchasing Rule 144A-eligible securities held by a Fund, however, could affect
adversely the marketability of such securities and a Fund might be unable to dispose of such securities promptly or at reasonable prices.
The Board of Trustees has delegated the function of making day-to-day determinations of liquidity to the Investment Manager’s Valuation Committee pursuant to guidelines approved by the Board. The Investment Manager
takes into account a number of factors in reaching liquidity determinations, including (1) the frequency of trades and quotes for the security, (2) the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the security and the number of other potential
purchasers, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market in the security, and (4) the nature of the security and the nature of the marketplace trades (e.g., the time needed to dispose of the security, the method
of soliciting offers and the mechanics of transfer). Pursuant to the Trust’s liquidity risk management program, the Investment Manager monitors the liquidity of restricted securities in a Fund’s portfolio and reports periodically on
liquidity determinations to the Board.
Temporary Defensive Positions. Each Fund may make temporary investments for defensive purposes in response to adverse market, economic, political, or other conditions, pending
investment of the proceeds of sales of portfolio securities, or at other times when suitable investments are not otherwise available. Each Fund may invest some or all of its assets in cash, bank deposits, money market funds, money market
securities of U.S. and foreign issuers, short term bonds, repurchase agreements, or similar investments. It is impossible to predict if, or for how long, a Fund will use any of such temporary defensive strategies.
Recent Market Conditions. Each Fund seeks to monitor market conditions on an ongoing basis and assess the impact of changing conditions on it and the risks associated with its
investments. If a Fund determines that changed market conditions have affected the risks associated with it, the Fund would normally seek to assess the significance of the change and whether it is material to shareholders. If so, the Fund would
typically seek to consider whether its existing disclosures are adequate in light of the changed conditions. If a Fund determines that changes in current market conditions have resulted in changes to the Fund’s risks that are material to investors,
and that its current disclosures do not adequately communicate the changes, the Fund would in most circumstances seek to update its communications to shareholders, as needed, and provide any such updated communications to shareholders, at the time
and in the manner required by the federal securities laws and as otherwise appropriate.
In recent years, U.S. and international markets have experienced significant periods of volatility due to a number of economic, political and global macro factors including the impact of the coronavirus as a
global pandemic and related public health issues, growth concerns in the U.S. and overseas, uncertainties regarding interest rates, trade tensions and the threat of tariffs imposed by the U.S. and other countries. In particular, the spread of
the novel coronavirus worldwide has resulted in disruptions to supply chains and customer activity, stress on the global healthcare system, rising unemployment claims, quarantines, cancellations, market declines, the closing of borders,
restrictions on travel and widespread concern and uncertainty. In addition, the impact and spread of infectious diseases in developing or emerging market countries may cause a relatively greater strain on those countries’ healthcare systems than
those in developed countries. Health crises and related political, social and economic disruptions caused by the spread of the recent coronavirus outbreak may also exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks in certain
countries. It is not possible to know the extent of these impacts, and they may be short term or may last for an extended period of time. These developments as well as other events, such as the U.S. presidential election in November 2020, could
result in further market volatility and negatively affect financial asset prices, the liquidity of certain securities and the normal operations of securities exchanges and other markets, despite government efforts to address market disruptions.
In addition, the Fund may face challenges with respect to its day-to-day operations if key personnel of the Fund’s Investment Manager or other service providers are unavailable due to quarantines and restrictions on travel related to the recent
coronavirus outbreak. As a result, the risk environment remains elevated. The Investment Manager will monitor developments and seek to manage each Fund in a manner consistent with achieving the Fund’s investment objective, but there can be no
assurance that it will be successful in doing so.
Additionally, in response to the 2008 financial crises, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) initiated a dramatic revision of the U.S. financial regulatory
framework that continues to unfold. The Dodd-Frank Act covers a broad range of topics, including (among many others) a reorganization of federal financial regulators; a process intended to improve financial systemic stability and the resolution of
potentially insolvent financial firms; new rules for derivatives trading; the creation of a consumer financial protection watchdog; the registration and additional regulation of hedge and private equity fund managers; and new federal requirements
for residential mortgage loans.
The statutory provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act significantly change in several respects the ways in which investment products are marketed, sold, settled or terminated. In particular, the Dodd-Frank Act mandates the
elimination of references to credit ratings in numerous securities laws, including the 1940 Act. Certain swap derivatives have been mandated for central clearing under the Dodd-Frank Act. Central clearing also entails the use of assets of a 1940
Act fund to satisfy margin calls and this may have an effect on the performance of such a fund. Margin requirements for cleared derivatives have been imposed by clearing organizations and for uncleared derivatives by regulators. Acceptable
collateral for these purposes is limited to high-quality, highly liquid instruments, some of which may be credited at less than current market value when posted as margin. In addition, even the long term sovereign credit rating of the U.S. has been
downgraded in recent years. These factors could lead to an increasing scarcity of acceptable collateral to post as margin for derivatives, which has the potential to increase the cost of entering into certain
derivative transactions.
The regulators that have been charged with the responsibility for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act (i.e., the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”)) have
been active in proposing and adopting regulations and guidance on the use of derivatives by 1940 Act funds. In 2012, the CFTC adopted a revision to one of its rules that may either restrict the use of derivatives by a 1940 Act fund (see “Regulation
of the Use of Options, Futures, and Forward Currency Contract Strategies”) or requires the fund’s adviser to register as a commodity pool operator. The SEC is reviewing its current guidance on the use of derivatives by 1940 Act funds and may issue
new guidance. It is not clear whether or when such new guidance will be published or what the content of such guidance may be.
At this time, uncertainties exist regarding how quickly the Federal Reserve will raise the federal funds rate, inflation and wage growth, other legislative and regulatory changes proposed by the President of the
United States, and how the financial markets will react to the foregoing and other developments.
Early Close/Trading Halt Risk. An exchange or market may close or issue trading halts on specific securities, or the ability to buy or sell certain securities or financial
instruments may be restricted, which may result in a Fund being unable to buy or sell certain securities or financial instruments. In such circumstances, the Fund may be unable to accurately price its investments and/or may incur substantial
trading losses.
Cybersecurity Risk. With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, the Funds are susceptible to operational, information security, and
related risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cyber attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through “hacking” or malicious software
coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing
denial-of-service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Cyber incidents affecting the Funds or their service providers may cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially
resulting in financial losses, interference with the Funds’ ability to calculate their NAV, impediments to trading, the inability of shareholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties,
reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional related costs. Similar adverse consequences could result from cyber incidents affecting issuers of securities in which the Funds invest, counterparties with which the
Funds engage in transactions, governmental and other regulatory authorities, exchange and other financial market operators, banks, brokers, dealers, insurance companies, and other financial institutions (including financial intermediaries and
service providers for shareholders) and other parties. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. While the Funds’ service providers may have established business continuity plans in
the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such cyber incidents, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. Furthermore, the Funds cannot control
the cyber security plans and systems put in place by their service providers or any other third parties whose operations may affect the Funds or their shareholders. As a result, in the event of a cyber incident, the Funds and their shareholders
could be negatively impacted.
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The following information supplements the discussion in the Prospectus of the investment policies and limitations, objective, and restrictions of each Fund.
Investment Policies and Limitations. Unless otherwise specified, the investment policies and limitations of each Fund are not fundamental. Any policy or
limitation that is not fundamental may be changed by the Board of Trustees of the Trust without shareholder approval.
Investment Objective. A Fund cannot change its fundamental investment objective without the approval of the lesser of: (1) 67% of the shares of the Fund
represented at a meeting at which more than 50% of the outstanding Fund shares are represented, or (2) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund. These percentages are required by the 1940 Act, and are referred to in this SAI as a “1940 Act
majority vote.”
Investment Restrictions. Each Fund has adopted the following fundamental investment restrictions that may not be changed without a 1940 Act majority vote. Except for the
percentage limitations referred to below with respect to borrowing, if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time an investment is made, a later change in percentage resulting from a change in value or assets will not constitute a violation
of that restriction.
Midas Fund
The Fund may not:
1.
|
Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act;
|
2.
|
Engage in the business of underwriting the securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter under the federal securities laws in connection with the disposition of the Fund’s
authorized investments;
|
3.
|
Purchase or sell real estate, provided that the Fund may invest in securities (excluding limited partnership interests) secured by real estate or interests therein or issued by companies which invest in real estate or interests
therein;
|
4.
|
Purchase or sell physical commodities (other than precious metals), although it may enter into (a) commodity and other futures contracts and options thereon, (b) options on commodities, including foreign currencies and precious
metals, (c) forward contracts on commodities, including foreign currencies and precious metals, and (d) other financial contracts or derivative instruments;
|
5.
|
Lend its assets, provided however, that the following are not prohibited: (a) the making of time or demand deposits with banks, (b) the purchase of debt securities such as bonds, debentures, commercial paper, repurchase agreements
and short term obligations in accordance with the Fund’s investment objectives and policies, and (c) engaging in securities, precious metals, and other asset loan transactions to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act;
|
6.
|
Issue senior securities as defined in the 1940 Act. The following will not be deemed to be senior securities prohibited by this provision: (a) evidences of indebtedness that the Fund is permitted to incur, (b) the issuance of
additional series or classes of securities that the Board of Trustees may establish, (c) the Fund’s futures, options, and forward transactions, and (d) to the extent consistent with the 1940 Act and applicable rules and policies adopted
by the SEC, (i) the establishment or use of a margin account with a broker for the purpose of effecting securities transactions on margin and (ii) short sales; or
|
7.
|
Purchase any securities, other than obligations of the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the
securities of issuers in the same industry, except that the Fund will, under normal circumstances, invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in securities of Natural Resources Companies.
|
Midas Magic
The Fund may not:
1.
|
Issue senior securities as defined in the 1940 Act. The following will not be deemed to be senior securities for this purpose: (a) evidences of indebtedness that the Fund is permitted to incur, (b) the issuance of additional series
or classes of securities that the Board of Trustees may establish, (c) the Fund’s futures, options, and forward currency transactions, and (d) to the extent consistent with the 1940 Act and applicable rules and policies adopted by the
SEC, (i) the establishment or use of a margin account with a broker for the purpose of effecting securities transactions on margin and (ii) short sales;
|
2.
|
Lend its assets, provided however, that the following are not prohibited: (a) the making of time or demand deposits with banks, (b) the purchase of debt securities such as bonds, debentures, commercial paper, repurchase agreements
and short term obligations in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies and (c) engaging in securities and other asset loan transactions limited to one third of the Fund’s total assets;
|
3.
|
Underwrite the securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter under the federal securities laws in connection with the disposition of the Fund’s authorized investments;
|
4.
|
Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act;
|
5.
|
Purchase or sell commodities or commodity futures contracts, although it may enter into (i) financial and foreign currency futures contracts and options thereon, (ii) options on foreign currencies, and (iii) forward contracts on
foreign currencies;
|
6.
|
Purchase or sell real estate, provided that the Fund may invest in securities (excluding limited partnership interests) secured by real estate or interests therein or issued by companies which invest in real estate or interests
therein; or
|
7.
|
Purchase any securities, other than obligations of the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities, if, immediately after such purchase, more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the
securities of issuers in the same industry.
|
Non-Fundamental Investment Limitations. The Board has established the following non-fundamental investment limitations that may be changed by the Board without shareholder
approval:
Each Fund may:
1.
|
Invest up to 15% of the value of its net assets in illiquid securities, including repurchase agreements providing for settlement in more than seven days after notice;
|
2.
|
Purchase securities issued by other investment companies to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act; and
|
3.
|
Pledge, mortgage, hypothecate or otherwise encumber its assets to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
|
OPTIONS, FUTURES, AND FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACT STRATEGIES
As discussed in the Prospectus, Midas Fund and Midas Magic may purchase and sell options (including options on commodities, foreign currencies, equity and debt securities, and securities indices), futures contracts
(including futures contracts on commodities, foreign currencies, securities, and securities indices), options on futures, and forward currency contracts (Midas Fund only) in an attempt to enhance returns by speculation or for hedging purposes.
Certain special characteristics of and risks associated with the use of these instruments by the Funds are discussed below.
Regulation of the Use of Options, Futures, and Forward Currency Contract Strategies. In addition to the investment guidelines (described below) adopted by the Funds to govern
investment in these instruments, the use of options, forward currency contracts, and futures is subject to the applicable regulations of the SEC, the several options and futures exchanges upon which such instruments may be traded, the CFTC and the
various state regulatory authorities. A Fund’s ability to use options, forward contracts and futures may be limited by market conditions, regulatory limits and tax considerations, and a Fund might not employ any of the strategies described above.
There can be no assurance that any strategy used will be successful. A Fund’s ability to successfully utilize these instruments may depend on the Investment Manager’s ability to predict accurately movements in the prices of the assets underlying
the options, forward contracts and futures and movements in securities, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices. There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market for options and futures will always exist, and the
historical correlations of the assets underlying the options, forward contracts and futures and portfolio objectives may be imperfect. There can be no assurance that the techniques described herein will provide adequate hedging or speculative
returns, or that such techniques are or will be actually or effectively available due to liquidity, costliness, or other factors. Hedging maneuvers may fail or actually increase risk, and investors should not assume the availability of any of the
hedging opportunities described herein. In any event, the Investment Manager will not likely attempt or obtain perfect balancing through hedging or otherwise, and a Fund might not use any hedging techniques, as described herein or otherwise, or
use options, forward contracts and futures for purely speculative purposes. It also may be necessary to defer closing out a position to avoid adverse tax consequences.
Historically, advisers of registered investment companies trading commodity interests (such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and swaps), including the Funds, have been excluded from regulation as
Commodity Pool Operators (“CPOs”) pursuant to CFTC Regulation 4.5. In February 2012, the CFTC announced substantial amendments to the permissible exclusions, and to the conditions for reliance on the permissible exclusions, from registration as a
CPO. To qualify for an exclusion under these amendments to CFTC Regulation 4.5, if a Fund uses commodity interests (such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and swaps) other than for bona fide hedging purposes (as defined by the
CFTC), the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 5% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and
unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount by which options that are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase are “in-the-money”) or, alternatively, the aggregate net notional value of those positions, determined at the time the
most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition, to qualify for an exclusion, a Fund must satisfy a marketing test,
which requires, among other things, that a Fund not hold itself out as a vehicle for trading commodity interests. CPOs were required to comply with the amendments to CFTC Regulation 4.5, which became effective on April 24, 2012, as of December 31,
2012.
The Investment Manager currently claims an exclusion (under CFTC Regulation 4.5) from registration as a CPO with respect to each Fund and, in its management of each Fund, intends to comply with one of the two
alternative trading limitations described above and the marketing limitation with respect to each Fund. Complying with the trading limitations may restrict the Investment Manager’s ability to use derivatives as part of the Funds’ investment
strategies. Although the Investment Manager expects to be able to execute the Funds’ investment strategies within the limitations, the Funds’ performance could be adversely affected. In addition, new rules under the Dodd-
Frank Act may limit the availability of certain derivatives, may make the use of derivatives by the Funds more costly, and may otherwise adversely impact the performance and value of derivatives.
In addition to the products, strategies, and risks described below, the Investment Manager may discover additional opportunities in connection with options, futures, and forward currency contracts. These new
opportunities may become available, as regulatory authorities broaden the range of permitted transactions and as new options, futures and forward currency contracts are developed. The Investment Manager may utilize these opportunities to the
extent they are consistent with a Fund’s investment objective and are permitted by a Fund’s investment limitations and applicable regulatory authorities.
Cover for Options, Futures, and Forward Currency Contract Strategies. A Fund will seek to comply with SEC guidelines regarding cover for these instruments, and will seek to,
if the guidelines so require, (1) set aside or segregate cash or liquid securities whose value is marked to the market daily in the prescribed amount, or (2) enter into an offsetting (“covered”) position in securities, currencies, or other options,
or futures contracts. Assets used for cover cannot be sold or closed while the position in the corresponding instrument is open, unless they are replaced with other appropriate assets. As a result, the commitment of a large portion of a Fund’s
assets could impede portfolio management or the Fund’s ability to meet current obligations.
Option Strategies. A Fund may purchase and write (sell) both exchange traded options and options traded on the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Exchange traded options in the
United States are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed; which, in effect, guarantees completion of every exchange traded option transaction. In contrast, OTC options are contracts between a
Fund and its counterparty with no clearing organization guarantee. Thus, when a Fund purchases an OTC option, it relies on the dealer from which it has purchased the OTC option to make or take delivery of the securities, currencies, or other
instrument underlying the option. Failure by the dealer to do so may result in the loss of any premium paid by a Fund as well as the loss of the expected benefit of the transaction.
A Fund may purchase call options on securities (both equity and debt) that the Investment Manager intends to include in a Fund’s portfolio in order to fix the cost of a future purchase. Call options also may be used
as a means of enhancing returns by, for example, participating in an anticipated price increase of a security. In the event of a decline in the price of the underlying security, use of this strategy may serve to limit the potential loss to a Fund
to the option premium paid. Conversely, if the market price of the underlying security increases above the exercise price and a Fund either sells or exercises the option, any profit eventually realized may be reduced by the premium paid.
A Fund may purchase put options on securities to hedge against a decline in the market value of securities held in its portfolio or to attempt to enhance return. A put option enables a Fund to sell the underlying
security at the predetermined exercise price; thus, the potential for loss to the Fund below the exercise price is limited to the option premium paid. If the market price of the underlying security is higher than the exercise price of the put
option, any profit a Fund realizes on the sale of the security may be reduced by the premium paid for the put option less any amount for which the put option may be sold.
A Fund may, on certain occasions, wish to hedge against a decline in the market value of securities held in its portfolio at a time when put options on those particular securities are not available or attractive for
purchase. A Fund may therefore purchase a put option on other selected securities, the values of which historically have positive correlation to the value of such portfolio securities. If the Investment Manager’s judgment is correct, changes in
the value of the put options should generally offset changes in the value of the portfolio securities being hedged. However, the correlation between the two values may not be as close in these transactions as in transactions in which a Fund
purchases a put option on a security held in its portfolio. If the Investment Manager’s judgment is not correct, the value of the securities underlying the put option may decrease less than the value of a Fund’s portfolio securities and therefore
the put option may not provide complete protection against a decline in the value of those securities below the level sought to be protected by the put option.
A Fund may write call options on securities for hedging or to increase return in the form of premiums received from the purchasers of the options. A call option gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy,
and the writer (seller) the obligation to sell, the underlying security at the exercise price during or at the end of the option period. This strategy may be used to provide limited protection against a decrease in the market price of the
security, in an amount equal to the premium received for writing the call option less any transaction costs. Thus, if the market price of the underlying security held by a Fund declines, the amount of such decline normally will be offset wholly or
in part by the amount of the premium received by the Fund. If, however, there is an increase in the market price of the underlying security to a level in excess of the option exercise price, and the option is exercised, a Fund may be obligated to
sell the security at less than its market value. In addition, a Fund could lose the ability to participate in an increase in the value of such securities above the exercise price of the call option because such an increase may likely be offset by
an increase in the cost of closing out the call option (or could be negated if the buyer chose to exercise the call option at an exercise price below the current market value). A Fund generally would give up the ability to sell any portfolio
securities used to cover the call option while the call option was outstanding.
A Fund also may write put options on securities. A put option gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell, and the writer (seller) the obligation to buy, the underlying security at the exercise price during
the option period. So long as the obligation of the writer continues, the writer may be assigned an exercise notice by the broker/dealer through whom such option was sold, requiring it to make payment of
the exercise price against delivery of the underlying security. If a put option is not exercised, a Fund may realize income in the amount of the premium received. This technique could be used to enhance current
return during periods of market uncertainty. The risk in such a transaction would be that the market price of the underlying security would decline below the exercise price less the premiums received, in which case a Fund would expect to suffer a
loss.
A Fund may purchase and write put and call options on securities indices in much the same manner as the more traditional securities options discussed above. Index options may serve as a hedge against overall
fluctuations in the securities markets (or a market sector) rather than anticipated increases or decreases in the value of a particular security. A securities index assigns values to the securities included in the index and fluctuates with changes
in such values. Settlements of securities index options are effected with cash payments and do not involve delivery of securities. Thus, upon settlement of a securities index option, the purchaser will realize, and the writer will pay, an amount
based on the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of the index. The effectiveness of hedging techniques using securities index options may depend on the extent to which price movements in the securities index selected
correlate with price movements of the securities in which a Fund invests.
A Fund may purchase and write straddles on securities and securities indexes. A long straddle is a combination of a call and a put purchased on the same securities index where the exercise price of the put is less
than or equal to the exercise price on the call. A Fund may enter into a long straddle when the Investment Manager believes that it is likely that securities prices will be more volatile during the term of the options than is implied by the option
pricing. A short straddle is a combination of a call and a put written on the same securities index where the exercise price of the put is less than or equal to the exercise price of the call. A Fund may enter into a short straddle when the
Investment Manager believes that it is unlikely that securities prices will be as volatile during the term of the options as is implied by the option pricing. In such a case, a Fund normally will set aside cash or segregate cash or liquid assets
equivalent in value to the amount, if any, by which the put is “in-the-money,” that is, that amount by which the exercise price of the put exceeds the current market value of the underlying securities index.
Foreign Currency Options and Related Risks. A Fund may take positions in options on foreign currencies to enhance returns by speculation or to hedge against the risk of
foreign exchange rate fluctuations on foreign securities that a Fund holds in its portfolio or that it intends to purchase. For example, if a Fund enters into a contract to purchase securities denominated in a foreign currency, it could
effectively fix the maximum U.S. dollar cost of the securities by purchasing call options on that foreign currency. Similarly, if a Fund held securities denominated in a foreign currency and anticipated a decline in the value of that currency
against the U.S. dollar, a Fund could hedge against such a decline by purchasing a put option on the currency involved. A Fund’s ability to establish and close out positions in such options is subject to the maintenance of a liquid secondary
market. Although many options on foreign currencies are exchange traded, the majority are traded on the OTC market. A Fund normally will not purchase or write such options unless, in the Investment Manager’s opinion, the market for them is
sufficiently liquid to ensure that the risks in connection with such options are not greater than the risks in connection with the underlying currency. In addition, options on foreign currencies are affected by all of those factors that influence
foreign exchange rates and investments generally.
The value of a foreign currency option depends upon the value of the underlying currency relative to the U.S. dollar. As a result, the price of the option position may vary with changes in the value of either or both
currencies and may have no relationship to the investment merits of a foreign security. Because foreign currency transactions occurring in the interbank market involve substantially larger amounts than those that may be involved in the use of
foreign currency options, investors may be disadvantaged by having to deal in an odd lot market (generally consisting of transactions of less than $1 million) for the underlying foreign currencies at prices that are less favorable than for round
lots.
There is no systematic reporting of last sale information for foreign currencies or any regulatory requirement that quotations available through dealers and other market resources be firm or revised on a timely
basis. Available quotation information is generally representative of very large transactions in the interbank market and thus may not reflect relatively smaller transactions (that is, less than $1 million) where rates may be less favorable. The
interbank market in foreign currencies is a global, around-the-clock market. To the extent that the U.S. options markets are closed while the markets for the underlying currencies remain open, significant price and rate movements may take place in
the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets until they reopen.
Special Characteristics and Risks of Options Trading. A Fund may effectively terminate its right or obligation under an option by entering into a closing transaction. If a
Fund wishes to terminate its obligation to purchase or sell under a put or a call option it has written, the Fund may purchase a put or a call option of the same series (that is, an option identical in its terms to the option previously written);
this is known as a closing purchase transaction. Conversely, in order to terminate its right to purchase or sell under a call or put option it has purchased, a Fund may sell an option of the same series as the option held; this is known as a
closing sale transaction. Closing transactions essentially permit a Fund, prior to the exercise or expiration of the related option, to realize profits or limit losses on its option position, to prevent an underlying security from being called, to
permit the sale of the underlying security or to enable a Fund to write another option on the underlying security with a different exercise price and/or expiration date. A Fund may realize a net gain or loss from a closing purchase transaction
depending on whether the net amount of the original premium received on the call option is more or less than the cost of effecting the closing purchase transaction.
In considering the use of options to enhance returns by speculation or to hedge a Fund’s portfolio, particular note should be taken of the following:
(1)
|
The value of an option position reflects, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, securities index, commodity, or currency (each an “underlying instrument”), the time remaining until expiration, the
relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying instrument, and general market conditions. For this reason, the successful use of options depends upon the Investment Manager’s
ability to forecast the direction of price fluctuations in the underlying securities, commodities or currency markets, or in the case of securities index options, fluctuations in the market sector represented by the selected index.
|
(2)
|
Options normally have expiration dates of up to three years. The exercise price of the options may be below, equal to or above the current market value of the underlying instrument during the term of the option. Purchased options
that expire unexercised have no value. Unless an option purchased by a Fund is exercised or unless a closing transaction is effected with respect to that position, the Fund will normally realize a loss in the amount of the premium paid
and any transaction costs.
|
(3)
|
A position in an exchange listed option may be closed out only on an exchange that provides a secondary market for identical options. Although the Funds intend to purchase or write only those exchange traded options for which there
appears to be a liquid secondary market, there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular option at any particular time. Closing transactions may be effected with respect to options traded in the OTC
markets only by negotiating directly with the other party to the option contract or in a secondary market for the option if such market exists. Although a Fund normally will enter into OTC options with dealers that appear to be willing
to enter into, and that are expected to be capable of entering into, closing transactions with a Fund, there can be no assurance that a Fund would be able to liquidate an OTC option at a favorable price at any time prior to expiration.
In the event of insolvency of the counterparty to an OTC option, a Fund may be unable to liquidate an OTC option. Accordingly, it may not be possible to effect closing transactions with respect to certain options, which may result in a
Fund having to exercise those options that it has purchased in order to realize any profit. With respect to options written by the Fund, the inability to enter into a closing transaction may result in material losses to a Fund. For
example, because a Fund may maintain a covered position with respect to call options it writes on an instrument, it may not sell the underlying instrument (or invest any cash or securities used to cover the option) during the period it
is obligated under such option. This requirement may impair a Fund’s ability to sell a portfolio security or make an investment at a time when such a sale or investment might be advantageous.
|
(4)
|
Securities index options are settled exclusively in cash. If a Fund writes a call option on an index, it cannot cover its obligation under the call index option by holding the underlying securities. In addition, a holder of a
securities index option who exercises it before the closing index value for that day is available runs the risk that the level of the underlying index may subsequently change.
|
(5)
|
A Fund’s activities in the options markets may result in a higher portfolio turnover rate (which in turn may result in recognition of net capital gains that will be taxable to shareholders when distributed to them) and additional
brokerage costs; however, a Fund also may save on commissions by using options rather than buying or selling individual securities in anticipation or as a result of market movements.
|
Futures and Related Options Strategies. A Fund may engage in futures strategies for hedging purposes, to attempt to reduce the overall investment risk that would normally be
expected to be associated with ownership of the securities in which it invests (or intends to acquire), or to enhance returns by speculation which may increase such risk. Such strategies may involve, among other things, using futures strategies to
manage the effective duration of a Fund. If the Investment Manager wishes to shorten a Fund’s effective duration, the Fund may sell an interest rate futures contract or a call option thereon, or may purchase a put option on such futures contract.
If the Investment Manager wishes to lengthen a Fund’s effective duration, the Fund may buy an interest rate futures contract or a call option thereon, or may sell a put option on such futures contract. Futures contracts and options thereon can
also be purchased and sold to attempt to enhance income or returns by speculation. A Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts or options thereon to increase or reduce its exposure to an asset class without purchasing or selling the underlying
securities, either as a hedge or to enhance returns by speculation.
A Fund may use interest rate futures contracts and options thereon to position its portfolio with respect to anticipated changes in the general level of interest rates. A Fund may purchase an interest rate futures
contract when it intends to purchase debt securities but has not yet done so. This strategy may minimize the effect of all or part of an increase in the market price of the debt security that a Fund intends to purchase in the future. A rise in
the price of the debt security prior to its purchase may either be offset by an increase in the value of the futures contract purchased by a Fund or avoided by taking delivery of the debt securities under the futures contract. Conversely, a fall
in the market price of the underlying debt security may result in a corresponding decrease in the value of the futures position. A Fund may sell an interest rate futures contract in order to continue to receive the income from a debt security,
while endeavoring to avoid part or all of the decline in market value of that security that may accompany an increase in interest rates.
A Fund may purchase a call option on an interest rate futures contract to benefit by a market advance in debt securities that the Fund plans to acquire at a future date. The purchase of a call option on an interest
rate futures contract is analogous to the purchase of a call option on an individual debt security, which can be used as a temporary substitute for a position in the security itself. A Fund also may write put options on interest rate futures
contracts to enhance returns, and may write call options on interest rate futures contracts to offset an anticipated decline in the price of debt securities held in its portfolio. A Fund also may purchase put options on interest rate futures
contracts in order to hedge against a decline in the value of debt securities held in its portfolio or to enhance returns by speculation.
A Fund may sell securities index futures contracts in anticipation of a general market or market sector decline. To the extent that a portion of a Fund’s portfolio correlates with a given index, the sale of futures
contracts on that index could reduce the risks associated with a market decline and thus provide an alternative to the liquidation of securities positions. For example, if a Fund correctly anticipates a general market decline and sells securities
index futures to benefit by this anticipated movement, the gain in the futures position may potentially offset some or all of the decline in the value of the portfolio. A Fund may purchase securities index futures contracts if a general market or
market sector advance is anticipated. Such a purchase of a futures contract could serve as a temporary substitute for the purchase of individual securities, which securities then may be purchased in an orderly fashion or as part of an attempt to
seek capital gain by speculation. This strategy may minimize the effect of all or part of an increase in the market price of securities that a Fund intends to purchase. A rise in the price of the securities should be offset wholly or in part by
gains in the futures position.
As in the case of a purchase of a securities index futures contract, a Fund may purchase a call option on a securities index futures contract on speculation for capital appreciation or as a hedge against a market
advance in securities that the Fund plans to acquire at a future date. The purchase of put options on securities index futures contracts can be analogous to the purchase of protective put options on individual securities where a level of
protection is sought below which no additional economic loss may be incurred by a Fund as part of an attempt to seek capital gain by speculation.
A Fund may sell foreign currency futures contracts to benefit from variations in the exchange rate of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. In addition, a Fund may sell foreign currency futures
contracts when the Investment Manager anticipates a general weakening of the foreign currency exchange rate that could adversely affect the market value of a Fund’s foreign securities holdings or interest payments to be received in that foreign
currency, or to enhance return by speculation. In this case, the sale of futures contracts on the underlying currency may reduce the risk to a Fund of a reduction in market value caused by foreign currency exchange rate variations and, by so
doing, provide an alternative to the liquidation of securities positions and resulting transaction costs. When the Investment Manager anticipates a significant foreign exchange rate increase while intending to invest in a security denominated in
that currency, a Fund may purchase a foreign currency futures contract to benefit from the increased rates pending completion of the anticipated transaction. Such a purchase may serve as a temporary measure to protect the Fund against any rise in
the foreign currency exchange rate that may add additional costs to acquiring the foreign security position. A Fund may also purchase call or put options on foreign currency futures contracts to obtain a fixed foreign currency exchange rate at
limited risk. A Fund may purchase a call option on a foreign currency futures contract to benefit from a rise in the foreign currency exchange rate while intending to invest in a security denominated in that currency or to enhance returns by
speculation. A Fund may purchase put options on foreign currency futures contracts to benefit from a decline in the foreign currency exchange rates or the value of its foreign portfolio securities or to enhance returns by speculation. A Fund may
write a put option on a foreign currency futures contract and may write a call option on a foreign currency futures contract as an income or capital appreciation strategy.
A Fund may also purchase these instruments to enhance income or return by speculation, for example by writing options on futures contracts. In addition, a Fund can use these instruments to change its exposure to
securities or commodities price changes, or interest or foreign currency exchange rate changes, for example, by changing the Fund’s exposure from one foreign currency exchange rate to another.
A Fund also may write put options on a futures contract while, at the same time, purchasing call options on the same futures contract in order to synthetically create a futures contract. The options typically will
have the same strike prices and expiration dates. A Fund normally will only engage in this strategy when it appears more advantageous to the Fund to do so as compared to purchasing the futures contract.
A Fund may also purchase and write covered straddles on futures contracts. A long straddle is a combination of a call and a put purchased on the same futures contracts at the same exercise price. A Fund may enter
into a long straddle when the Investment Manager believes that it is likely that the futures contract will be more volatile during the term of the options than is implied by the option pricing. A Fund may enter into a short straddle when the
Investment Manager believes that it is unlikely that the futures contract will be as volatile during the term of the options as is implied by the option pricing.
Special Characteristics and Risks of Futures and Related Options Trading. No price is paid upon entering into a futures contract. Instead, upon entering into a futures
contract, a Fund is required to segregate in the name of the futures broker through whom the transaction is effected an amount of cash or liquid securities generally equal to 10% or less of the contract value whose value is marked to the market
daily. This amount is known as “initial margin.” When writing a call or a put option on a futures contract and certain options on currencies, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Unlike margin in securities
transactions, initial
margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures or options transactions. Rather, initial margin is in the nature of a performance bond or good faith deposit on the contract that is returned to a Fund upon
termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment.
Additionally, initial margin requirements may be increased generally in the future by regulatory action. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures or options
position varies, a process known as “marking to the market.” For example, when a Fund purchases a contract and the value of the contract rises, it receives from the broker a variation margin payment equal to that increase in value. Conversely, if
the value of the futures position declines, the Fund is required to make a variation margin payment to the broker equal to the decline in value. Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the transaction but rather represents a daily
settlement of the Fund’s obligations to or from a clearing organization.
Buyers and sellers of futures positions and options thereon can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing transactions on options on securities, by selling or purchasing an offsetting contract or
option. Futures contracts or options thereon may be closed only on an exchange or board of trade providing a secondary market for such futures contracts or options.
Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may establish daily limits on the amount that the price of a futures contract or option may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the
daily limit has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movements during a particular trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses, because
prices could move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading and thereby prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions. As a result, a Fund’s access to other assets held to cover its options or future
positions could also be impaired. In such event, it may not be possible for a Fund to close a position and, in the event of adverse price movements, it may have to make daily cash payments of variation margin (except in the case of purchased
options).
In considering a Fund’s use of futures contracts and options, particular note should be taken of the following:
(1)
|
Futures and options are highly speculative and aggressive instruments. Successful use by a Fund of futures contracts and options may depend upon the Investment Manager’s ability to predict movements in the direction of the overall
securities, currencies, precious metals and interest rate markets, which requires different skills and techniques than predicting changes in the prices of individual securities. Moreover, these contracts relate not only to the current
price level of the underlying instrument or currency but also to the anticipated price levels at some point in the future. There is, in addition, the risk that the movements in the price of the contract will not correlate with the
movements in the prices of the securities, commodities or currencies underlying the contract or the Fund’s portfolio securities. For example, if the price of the securities index futures contract moves less than the price of the
securities, the correlation will be imperfect. Further, if the price of the securities has moved in an unfavorable direction, a Fund may be in a better position than if it had not used the contract at all. If the price of the securities
has moved in a favorable direction, the advantage may be partially offset by losses in the contract position. In addition, if a Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to borrow or sell assets from its portfolio to meet daily variation
margin requirements. Any such sale of assets may or may not be made at prices that reflect a rising market. Consequently, a Fund may need to sell assets at a time when such sales are disadvantageous to it. If the price of the contract
moves more than the price of the underlying securities, a Fund can experience either a loss or a gain on the contract that may or may not be completely offset by movements in the price of the securities.
|
(2)
|
In addition to the possibility that there may be an imperfect correlation, or no correlation at all, between price movements in the futures or options position and
the underlying instruments, movements in the prices of these contracts may not correlate perfectly with movements in the prices of the securities, precious metals or currencies due to price distortions in the futures and options market.
There may be several reasons unrelated to the value of the underlying instruments that cause this situation to occur. First, as noted above, all participants in the futures and options market are subject to initial and margin
requirements. If, to avoid meeting additional margin deposit requirements or for other reasons, investors choose to close a significant number of futures contracts or options through offsetting transactions, distortions in the normal price
relationship between the securities, precious metals, currencies and the futures and options markets may occur. Second, because the margin deposit requirements in the futures and options market are less onerous than margin requirements in
the securities market, there may be increased participation by speculators in the futures market; such speculative activity in the futures market also may cause temporary price distortions. As a result, a correct forecast of general market
trends may not result in successful use of futures contracts or options over the short term. In addition, activities of large traders in both the futures and securities markets involving arbitrage and other investment strategies may result
in temporary price distortions.
|
(3)
|
Positions in futures contracts and options on futures may be closed out only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market for such contracts. Although a Fund intends to purchase and sell such contracts only on
exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be an active secondary market, there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange or board of trade will exist for any particular contract at any particular time. In
such event, it may not be possible to close a position, and in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund may continue to be required to make variation margin payments.
|
(4)
|
Like options on securities and currencies, options on futures contracts have limited life. The ability to establish and close out options on futures may be subject to the maintenance of liquid secondary markets on the relevant
exchanges or boards of trade.
|
(5)
|
Purchasers of options on futures contracts pay a premium at the time of purchase. This amount and the transaction costs are all that is at risk. Sellers of options on futures contracts, however, must post initial margin and are
subject to additional margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. In addition, although the maximum amount at risk when a Fund purchases an option is the premium paid for the option and the
transaction costs, there may be circumstances when the purchase of an option on a futures contract may result in a loss to the Fund when the use of a futures contract may not, such as when there is no movement in the level of the
underlying securities index value or the underlying securities, precious metals or currencies.
|
(6)
|
As is the case with options, a Fund’s activities in the futures and options on futures markets may result in a higher portfolio turnover rate (which in turn may result in recognition of net capital gains that will be taxable to
shareholders when distributed to them) and additional transaction costs in the form of added brokerage commissions; however, the Fund also may save on commissions by using futures contracts or options thereon rather than buying or
selling individual securities or currencies in anticipation or as a result of market movements.
|
Special Risks Related to Foreign Currency Futures Contracts and Related Options. Buyers and sellers of foreign currency futures contracts are subject to the same risks that
apply to the use of futures generally. In addition, there are risks associated with foreign currency futures contracts and their use similar to those associated with options on foreign currencies described above.
Options on foreign currency futures contracts may involve certain additional risks. The ability to establish and close out positions on such options is subject to the maintenance of a liquid secondary market.
Compared to the purchase or sale of foreign currency futures contracts, the purchase of call or put options thereon involves less potential risk to a Fund because the maximum amount at risk is the premium paid for the option (plus transaction
costs). However, there may be circumstances when the purchase of a call or put option on a foreign currency futures contract may result in a loss, such as when there is no movement in the price of the underlying currency or futures contract, when
the purchase of the underlying futures contract may not result in such a loss.
Forward Currency Contracts. A Fund may use forward currency contracts to protect against uncertainty in the level of future foreign currency exchange rates or to enhance
returns by speculation. A Fund may also use forward currency contracts in one currency or basket of currencies to attempt to benefit by fluctuations in the value of securities denominated in a different currency if the Investment Manager
anticipates that there may be a correlation between the two currencies.
A Fund may enter into forward currency contracts with respect to specific transactions. For example, when a Fund enters into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security denominated in a foreign currency, or
the Fund anticipates the receipt in a foreign currency of dividend or interest payments on a security that it holds or anticipates purchasing, it may desire to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of the security or the U.S. dollar equivalent of such
payment by entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale, for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars or foreign currency, of the amount of foreign currency involved in the underlying transaction. The Fund normally will thereby be able to
protect itself against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the currency exchange rates during the period between the date on which the security is purchased or sold, or on which the payment is declared or
accrues, and the date on which the payments are made or received. A Fund also may use forward currency contracts in connection with portfolio positions.
A Fund also may use forward currency contracts to shift its exposure from one foreign currency to another. For example, if a Fund owns securities denominated in a foreign currency and the Investment Manager believes
that currency may decline relative to another currency, it might enter into a forward contract to sell the appropriate amount of the first currency with payment to be made in the second currency. Transactions that use two foreign currencies are
sometimes referred to as “cross hedging.” Use of a different foreign currency magnifies the Fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. A Fund also may purchase forward currency contracts to enhance income when the Investment
Manager anticipates that the foreign currency may appreciate in value, but securities denominated in that foreign currency do not present attractive investment opportunities.
The precise matching of the forward contract amounts and the value of the securities involved will not generally be possible because the future value of such securities in foreign currencies can change as a
consequence of market movements in the value of those securities between the date the forward contract is entered into and the date it matures. Accordingly, it may be necessary for a Fund to purchase additional foreign currency on the spot (that
is, cash) market (and bear the expense of such purchase) if the market value of the security is less than the amount of foreign currency the Fund is obligated to deliver and if a decision is made to sell the security and make delivery of the
foreign currency. Conversely, it may be necessary to sell on the spot market some of the foreign currency received upon the sale of the portfolio security if the market value of the security exceeds the amount of foreign currency the Fund is
obligated to deliver. The projection of short term currency market movements is extremely difficult and the successful execution of a short term strategy is highly uncertain. Forward contracts involve the risk that anticipated currency movements
may not be accurately predicted, causing a Fund to sustain losses on these contracts and transaction costs. Under normal circumstances, consideration of the prospects for currency parities may be incorporated into the longer term investment
decisions made with regard to overall diversification or other investment strategies.
However, the Investment Manager believes that it is important to have the flexibility to enter into forward contracts when it determines that the best interests of a Fund may be served.
At or before the maturity date of a forward contract requiring a Fund to sell a currency, it may either sell a portfolio security and use the sale proceeds to make delivery of the currency or retain the security and
offset its contractual obligation to deliver the currency by purchasing a second contract pursuant to which it will obtain, on the same maturity date, the same amount of the currency that it is obligated to deliver. Similarly, a Fund may close out
a forward contract requiring it to purchase a specified currency by entering into a second contract entitling it to sell the same amount of the same currency on the maturity date of the first contract. The Fund may realize a gain or loss as a
result of entering into such an offsetting forward currency contract under either circumstance to the extent the exchange rate or rates between the currencies involved moved between the execution dates of the first contract and the offsetting
contract.
The cost to a Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currencies involved, the length of the contract period and the market conditions then prevailing. Because forward currency
contracts are usually entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved. The use of forward currency contracts does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities a Fund owns or intends to acquire, but
it does fix a rate of exchange in advance. In addition, although the use of forward currency contracts for hedging may limit the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currencies, at the same time it limits any potential gain
that might result should the value of the currencies increase.
Although a Fund values its assets daily in terms of U.S. dollars, it does not intend to convert its holdings of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars on a daily basis. A Fund may convert foreign currency from time to
time, and investors should be aware of the costs of currency conversion. Although foreign exchange dealers do not charge a fee for conversion, they do realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling
various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency to a Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire to resell that currency to the dealer.
FUND COMPLEX
The investment companies (“Fund Complex”) advised by affiliates of Winmill & Co. Incorporated (“Winco”), the parent company of the Investment Manager, are:
Dividend and Income Fund (closed end investment company)
Foxby Corp. (closed end investment company)
Midas Series Trust (open-end investment company with two series: Midas Fund and Midas Magic)
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
The Board of Trustees is responsible for the management and supervision of the Funds. The Board approves all significant agreements with those companies that furnish services to the Funds. These companies are as
follows: Midas Management Corporation, the Funds’ Investment Manager; Midas Securities Group, Inc., the Funds’ distributor (the “Distributor”); Ultimus Asset Services, LLC, the Funds’ transfer and dividend disbursing agent, fund accountant, and
tax service provider (the “Transfer Agent”); and HNB, and its global subcustodial network, the custodian of the Funds’ securities and a provider of credit facilities under the Credit Agreement.
The independent Trustees of the Trust (i.e., the trustees who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act, of any of the Funds in the Fund Complex) are also
members of the Audit Committee of the Board. The Audit Committee normally meets three times per year. The Audit Committee, among other things, meets with the Funds’ Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (“IRPAF”) to review its financial
reporting, external audit matters, and fees charged by the IRPAF and evaluates the independence of the IRPAF. The Audit Committee is also responsible for recommending the selection, retention, or termination of the IRPAF and to review any other
relevant matter to seek to provide the highest level of integrity and accuracy in the Funds’ financial reporting. The Audit Committee met three times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 .
The names of the Trustees of the Trust, and their respective offices, dates of birth, and principal occupations during the last five years are set forth below.
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES (1)
|
Name, Address (2), and Date of Birth
|
Trustee Since (3)
|
Principal Occupation and
Business Experience
for the Past Five Years
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (4)
|
Other Directorships Held by Trustee During the Past Five Years (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon Tomasson
September 20, 1958
|
2017
|
Mr. Tomasson serves as Chief Executive Officer of Vinland Capital Investments, LLC (since 2002), a real estate investment company that he founded , and Chief Investment Officer of NRE
Capital Partners LLC (since 2019), a private real estate lending company . Prior to starting Vinland, Mr. Tomasson was a principal with Cardinal Capital, a leading investor in single-tenant net-leased property, and served as a Vice
President at Citigroup in the Global Real Estate Equity and Structured Finance group, part of the Real Estate Investment Bank, with both transactional and various management responsibilities.
|
4
|
None
|
Peter K. Werner
August 16, 1959
|
2012
(Predecessor
Fund: 2004)
|
Since 1996, Mr. Werner has taught, directed, and coached many programs at The Governor’s Academy of Byfield MA. Currently, he teaches economics and history at the Governor’s Academy. Previously, he held the
position of Vice President in the Fixed Income Departments of Lehman Brothers and First Boston. His responsibilities included trading sovereign debt instruments, currency arbitrage, syndication, medium term note trading, and money market
trading.
|
4
|
None
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE
|
Thomas B. Winmill (6) (7)
PO Box 4
Walpole, NH 03608
June 25, 1959
|
2012
(Predecessor
Fund: 1993)
|
Mr. Winmill is President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Chief Legal Officer, and a Trustee or Director of the Trust, Dividend and Income Fund, and Foxby Corp. He is a Director or Manager, President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Legal Officer of the Investment Manager and Bexil Advisers LLC, registered investment advisers (collectively, the “Advisers”), Bexil Securities LLC and Midas Securities Group, Inc., registered
broker-dealers (collectively, the “Broker-Dealers”), Bexil Corporation, a holding company (“Bexil”), and Winco, a holding company. He is a Director of Global Self Storage, Inc., a self storage REIT (“SELF”) and Bexil American Mortgage Inc.
He is Chairman of the Investment Policy Committee of each of the Advisers (the “IPCs”), and he is a portfolio manager of Midas Fund, Midas Magic, Dividend and Income Fund, and Foxby Corp. He is a member of the New York State Bar and the SEC
Rules Committee of the Investment Company Institute.
|
4
|
Global Self Storage, Inc.
|
(1) Refers to Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund as defined under the Act.
(2) Unless otherwise noted, the address of record for the Trustees is 11 Hanover Square, New York, New York 10005.
(3) Each Trustee shall hold office until his or her successor is elected, his or her death, or the Trust terminates, whichever is sooner, with certain exceptions.
(4) The “Fund Complex” is comprised of each series of the Trust, Dividend and Income Fund, and Foxby Corp., which are managed by the Investment Manager or its affiliate.
(5) Refers to directorships and trusteeships held by a Trustee during the past five years in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any company registered as an
investment company under the Act, excluding those within the Fund Complex.
(6) Thomas B. Winmill is an “interested person” (as defined in the Act) of the Trust because of his position with the Investment Manager.
(7) Thomas B. Winmill and Mark C. Winmill are brothers.
Messrs. Tomasson and Werner also serve on the Audit and Nominating Committees of the Board. Mr. Winmill also serves on the Executive Committee of the Board.
None of the independent Trustees, nor their immediate family members, held any positions (other than trustee or director of the Funds in the Fund Complex) with the Investment Manager, the Distributor, Winco, or their affiliates or any
person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Investment Manager, the Distributor, Winco, or their affiliates, during the two most recently completed calendar years.
|
Overall responsibility for the management of the Funds rests with the Board of Trustees. The Board recognizes the critical role that the Trustees, and particularly the independent Trustees, serve. The Board is not
responsible for day-to-day management of the Funds but it does bear important other duties. To enhance the independence and effectiveness of the Trustees in these endeavors, and to assist them in
serving their role on behalf of the interests of the Funds’ shareholders, the Board has adopted, and periodically reviews, policies and procedures designed to address and monitor risks to the Funds and conflicts of
interest of which the Board is aware between the Funds and the Investment Manager and other service providers. Such risks include, among others, investment risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, valuation risk and operational risk, as well as the
overall business and disclosure risks relating to the Funds. Under the overall supervision of the Board, the Investment Manager and other service providers to the Funds also have implemented a variety of processes, procedures, and controls to
address these risks. Different processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks. These processes include those that are embedded in the conduct of regular business by the Board and in the responsibilities
of officers of the Funds and other service providers, but there can be no assurance that all risks can be avoided. Officers of the Trust, including the President, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, and Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”),
report to the Board on a variety of matters at regular and special meetings of the Board, including matters relating to risk management. The Chief Financial Officer also reports regularly to the Board and to the Audit Committee on the Funds’
internal controls and accounting and financial reporting policies and practices. The Board and the Audit Committee also receive regular reports from the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm on internal control and financial
reporting matters. On at least a quarterly basis, the Board meets with the Funds’ CCO, including meetings in executive session, to discuss issues related to portfolio compliance and, on at least an annual basis, receives a report from the CCO
regarding the effectiveness of the Funds’, Investment Manager’s, and other service providers’ compliance programs. In addition, the Board also receives reports from the Investment Manager on the investments and securities trading of the Funds, as
well as reports from the Investment Manager’s Valuation Committee regarding the valuation of those investments. The Board receives reports from the Funds’ primary service providers on a periodic or regular basis, including the Investment Manager
as well as the Funds’ Custodian and Distributor . The Investment Manager also reports to the Board on other matters relating to risk management on a regular and as-needed basis.
Thomas B. Winmill, an “interested person” of the Funds, acts as Chairman of the Board of the Trust. The Board does not have a “lead independent Trustee.” Given the policies described above, the Trustees have
determined that the current leadership structure of the Board is appropriate.
With respect to the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led to the conclusion that each person should serve as a Trustee of the Trust, the Board considered and evaluated each Trustee’s
relevant knowledge, experience, and expertise, the Trustee’s ability to carry out his duties in the best interests of the Funds, and the Trustee’s independence. Mr. Werner has experience with financial, accounting, regulatory, investment, and
Board operational matters as well as monitoring the Investment Manager and other Fund service providers through his former position as Vice President in the Fixed Income Departments of Lehman Brothers and First Boston and as a result of his service
as a fund independent Trustee for more than fifteen years. Mr. Tomasson has experience with financial, accounting, regulatory, investment, and board operational matters through his current position as Chief Executive Officer of Vínland Capital
Investments, LLC, and his former positions as a principal with Cardinal Capital Partners, and as a Vice President at Citigroup in the Global Real Estate Equity and Structured Finance group, part of the Real Estate Investment Bank. Additionally,
each of Messrs. Tomasson and Werner has been deemed an Audit Committee financial expert as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other applicable law. Mr. Thomas Winmill has experience with financial, accounting, regulatory, investment,
and Board operational matters as well as monitoring the Investment Manager and other Fund service providers as a result of his service as a Fund/Trust officer and interested Trustee for more than twenty years.
The executive officers of the Trust, other than those who serve as Trustees, each of whom serves at the pleasure of the Board, are as follows:
OFFICERS OF THE TRUST
|
Name, Address (1),
and Date of Birth
|
Title and Officer Since (2)
|
Principal Occupation and Business Experience for the Past Five Years
|
Russell Kamerman, Esq.
July 8, 1982
|
Chief Compliance Officer since 2014. Secretary and General Counsel since 2017
|
Chief Compliance Officer (since 2014), Secretary (since 2017), and General Counsel (since 2017) of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Advisers, the Broker-Dealers, and Bexil. He is
Assistant Chief Compliance Officer, Assistant Secretary, and Assistant General Counsel of SELF, Winco, and Tuxis Corporation, a real estate company (‘‘Tuxis”). From December 2014 to June 2017, Mr. Kamerman served as Anti-Money Laundering
Officer of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Advisers, Bexil, SELF, Winco, and Tuxis. He is a member of the New York State Bar and the Chief Compliance Officer Committee and the Advertising Compliance Advisory
Committee of the Investment Company Institute. Previously, he was an attorney in private practice focusing on regulatory, compliance, and other general corporate matters relating to the structure, formation, and operation of investment
funds and investment advisers.
|
Heidi Keating
March 28, 1959
|
Vice President since 2012 (Predecessor Fund: 1988)
|
Vice President of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Advisers, the Broker-Dealers, Bexil, SELF, Tuxis, and Winco. She is a member of the IPCs.
|
Donald Klimoski II, Esq.
September 24, 1980
|
Assistant Secretary, Assistant General Counsel, and Assistant Chief Compliance Officer since 2017
|
Assistant Secretary, Assistant General Counsel, and Assistant Chief Compliance Officer of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Advisers, the Broker-Dealers, and Bexil. He is Chief
Compliance Officer, Secretary, and General Counsel of SELF, Winco, and Tuxis. He is a member of the New York, New Jersey and Patent Bars and the Compliance Advisory Committee of the Investment Company Institute. Previously, he served as
Associate General Counsel of Commvault Systems, Inc. Prior to that, he was an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, where his practice focused on mergers and acquisitions, securities law, corporate governance, intellectual property and
related matters.
|
Thomas O’Malley
July 22, 1958
|
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Vice President since 2012 (Predecessor Fund: 2005)
|
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Advisers, the Broker-Dealers, Bexil, SELF, Tuxis, and Winco. He is a
certified public accountant.
|
Mark C. Winmill (3)
November 26, 1957
|
Vice President since 2012
|
Vice President of the other investment companies in the Fund Complex and Midas Management Corporation. He is a member of the IPCs. He is President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and a Director of SELF
and Tuxis. He is Executive Vice President and a Director of Winco, and a principal of the Broker-Dealers.
|
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the address of record for the officers is 11 Hanover Square, New York, New York 10005.
(2) Officers hold their positions with the Trust until a successor has been duly elected and qualifies. Officers are generally elected annually at the December meeting of the Board of Trustees. The officers
were last elected on December 11, 2019 .
(3) Thomas B. Winmill and Mark C. Winmill are brothers.
|
The following table presents certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of each Fund’s shares as of December 31, 2019 by each Trustee of the Trust.
Name of Trustee
|
Dollar Range
of Equity Securities in Midas Fund
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Midas Magic
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in Fund Complex
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Trustees:
|
Jon Tomasson
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Peter K. Werner
|
$10,001 - $50,000
|
$ 10,001 - $50,000
|
$10,001 - $50,000
|
|
Interested Trustee:
|
|
|
|
Thomas B. Winmill
|
$ 50,001 - $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
As of December 31, 2019 , no independent Trustee or member of his immediate family owned beneficially or of record any securities in the Investment Manager or the Distributor or in any person controlled by,
under common control with, or controlling the Investment Manager or the Distributor.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 , the independent Trustees received (or were entitled to receive) the following fees for service as a Trustee:
Compensation Table
Name of Person, Position
|
Aggregate Compensation From Each Fund
|
Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Fund Expenses
|
Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement
|
Total Compensation From Fund and Fund Complex Paid to Trustees
|
|
Jon Tomasson, Trustee
|
$ 6,140 (Midas Fund)
$ 5,360 (Midas Magic)
|
None
|
None
|
$ 44,375
|
|
Peter K. Werner, Trustee
|
$ 6,718 (Midas Fund)
$ 5,782 (Midas Magic)
|
None
|
None
|
$ 46,375
|
No officer, trustee or employee of the Investment Manager received any compensation from the Funds for acting in their capacity as such for the Funds. With respect to the Funds’ CCO, however, the Board appointed the
CCO of the Funds to report directly to the Board and to have such duties and responsibilities as are required by Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act and as the Board may further define from time to time. The fair and reasonable compensation of the CCO is
subject to the approval of the Board. Payment of such CCO compensation is made by the Investment Manager in advance of reimbursement by the Funds pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, as described below. Further, such CCO compensation
is charged to parties other than the Funds based on an estimated assessment of time and other factors.
As of April 1, 2020 , officers and Trustees of the Trust directly and indirectly beneficially owned, in the aggregate, less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Midas Fund and approximately 1. 35 % of the
outstanding shares of Midas Magic.
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
A principal shareholder is any person who owns of record or beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding shares of a Fund. As of April 1, 2020 , the following persons were record owners (or to the
knowledge of a Fund, beneficial owners) of 5% or more of the outstanding shares of such Fund:
Name and Address
|
% Ownership (Applicable Fund)
|
Type of Ownership
|
Charles Schwab & Co.
Inc./Special Custody A/C
FBO Customers
Attn: Mutual Funds
211 Main St
San Francisco, CA 94105
|
5.77 % (Midas Fund)
|
Record
|
Charles Schwab & Co.
Inc./Reinvest Acct
Attn: Mutual Funds Dept.
101 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94104-4122
|
6.17 % (Midas Fund)
|
Record
|
TD Ameritrade Inc. for the Exclusive Benefit of our Clients
PO Box 2226
Omaha, NE 68103-2226
|
9.77 % (Midas Fund)
|
Record
|
As of April 1, 2020 , no shareholder owned a controlling interest (25% or greater) of any Fund.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Funds, the Investment Manager, and the Distributor each has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act (the “Code of Ethics”) that permits its personnel, subject to such code, to invest in
securities for their own accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the Funds. The Code of Ethics and related procedures restrict the personal securities transactions of its employees and require portfolio managers and other
investment personnel to comply with pre-clearance and disclosure procedures. Its primary purpose is to, among other things, ensure that personal trading by the Investment Manager’s employees does not disadvantage the Funds.
PROXY VOTING
The Board has delegated the Funds’ vote of proxies, as described in the Funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures (attached to this SAI as Appendix B), to an independent third party voting service. The Funds have
retained the right to override the delegation to the independent third party voting service on a case by case basis. With respect to a vote upon which a Fund overrides the third party voting service delegation to the extent that such vote presents
a conflict of interest with management, the Fund normally will disclose such conflict to and obtain consent from the Trust’s independent Trustees or a committee thereof prior to voting the proxy.
A Fund may recall a loaned security in time to vote proxies or otherwise obtain rights to vote proxies of loaned securities if, among other things, the Fund believes a material event is likely to occur.
In addition, information regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to its portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available without charge, upon request by calling the Funds
toll-free at 1-800-400-MIDAS (6432) or on the Funds’ website at http://www.midasfunds.com and on the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
It is the policy of the Investment Manager to protect the confidentially of client holdings and prevent the selective disclosure of non-public information concerning the Funds. The Funds have adopted Portfolio
Information Disclosure Procedures (“Disclosure Policies”), as described below, which set forth the policies to be followed by the Funds’ officers and the Investment Manager when disclosing information about the portfolio holdings of the Funds.
Generally, no information concerning the portfolio holdings of the Funds may be disclosed to any unaffiliated third party except as provided in the Disclosure Policies; although nothing therein is intended to prevent
the disclosure of any and all portfolio information to the Funds’ services providers who generally need access to such information in the performance of their contractual duties and responsibilities and are subject to duties of confidentiality
imposed by law and/or contract. Such service providers may include, without limitation, the Investment Manager, Custodian, fund accountants, IRPAF, attorneys, and each of their respective affiliates and advisors.
Pursuant to the Disclosure Policies, each officer of the Funds may authorize the disclosure of non-public information concerning the portfolio holdings of the Funds on a case by case basis, subject to the approval of
the CCO. The Investment Manager may publicly disclose all month end portfolio holdings of all Funds after a 30 day delay. With respect to analytical information, the Investment Manager may distribute the following information concerning each
Fund’s month end portfolio prior to the 30 day delay period, provided that (a) at least 15 calendar days have elapsed since the month end to which the information relates and (b) the information has been made publicly available via the Investment
Manager’s website or at www.midasfunds.com (but not earlier than the 15 calendar day restriction): top ten holdings and the total percentage of the Fund such aggregate holdings represent, sector information, and the total percentage of the
Fund held in each sector, and any other analytical data that does not identify any specific portfolio holding. Examples of permitted data include total net assets, number of holdings, market capitalization, P/E ratio, R2, and beta.
The Investment Manager may disclose (or authorize a service provider to the Funds to disclose) month end portfolio holdings for a legitimate business purpose (which shall not include the receipt of compensation as
consideration for the disclosure) before the expiration of the applicable delay periods identified above and public disclosure of the information. The Investment Manager may distribute portfolio holdings information pursuant to a third party
service arrangement with Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) which provides that ISS does not distribute the portfolio holdings or results of the analysis to third parties, other departments or persons who are likely to use the information
for purposes of purchasing or selling the Funds or the portfolio securities before the expiration of the applicable delay periods identified above and public disclosure of such information. Entities unwilling to execute an acceptable
confidentiality agreement may only receive portfolio holdings information that has otherwise been publicly disclosed in accordance with the Disclosure Policies.
Officers or employees of the Investment Manager or the Funds may disclose or confirm the ownership of any individual portfolio holding position to reporters, brokers, shareholders, consultants or other interested
persons only if such information previously has been publicly disclosed in accordance with these Disclosure Policies. Certain exceptions to the Disclosure Policies permit the non-public disclosure of portfolio holdings to a limited group of third
parties so long as the third party has signed a written confidentially agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Board of Trustees and the Investment Manager may, on a case by case basis, impose additional restrictions on the
dissemination of portfolio information beyond those found in the Disclosure Policies. The Disclosure Policies may not be waived, or exceptions made, without the consent of the Funds’ CCO. All waivers and exceptions are to be disclosed to the
Board of Trustees no later than its next regularly scheduled quarterly meeting. Nothing contained in the Disclosure Policies is intended to prevent the disclosure of portfolio holdings information as may be required by applicable law.
The Disclosure Policies, as described above, seek to ensure that disclosure of information about portfolio securities is in the best interests of Fund shareholders and address potential conflicts between the
interests of Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Fund’s
investment manager ; principal underwriter; or any affiliated person of the Fund, its investment manager , or its principal underwriter, on the other.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
The Investment Manager, a registered investment adviser, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Winco. Other principal subsidiaries of Winco include Midas Securities Group, Inc., the Funds’ distributor and a registered
broker-dealer. The principal business address of Winco and its subsidiaries, including Midas Securities Group, Inc., is 11 Hanover Square, New York, New York 10005.
Winco is a Delaware corporation whose securities are traded in the over the counter market. Thomas B. Winmill and Mark C. Winmill control Winco through a voting trust.
Listed below are affiliated persons of the Funds who are also affiliated persons of the Investment Manager. The capacities by which they are affiliated are also included.
Affiliated Persons of the Funds, the Investment Manager, and the Distributor
Affiliated Person
|
Position(s) with Funds
|
Position(s) with
Investment Manager
|
Position(s) with Distributor
|
|
Thomas B. Winmill
|
Trustee, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Legal Officer
|
Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Legal Officer, IPC Chairman, Portfolio Manager
|
Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Legal Officer
|
|
Mark C. Winmill
|
Vice President
|
Chief Investment Strategist, IPC Member, Executive Vice President
|
Principal, Executive Vice President
|
|
Thomas O’Malley
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, Vice President
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, Vice President
|
|
Russell Kamerman
|
General Counsel, Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer
|
General Counsel, Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer
|
General Counsel, Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Heidi Keating
|
Vice President
|
Vice President, IPC Member
|
Vice President
|
|
Donald Klimoski II
|
Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Chief Compliance Officer, Assistant Secretary
|
Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Secretary, Assistant Chief Compliance Officer
|
Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Secretary, Assistant Chief Compliance Officer
|
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
The Trust has entered into an Investment Management Agreement with the Investment Manager under which the Investment Manager acts as general manager of each Fund, responsible for the various
functions assumed by it, including the regular furnishing of advice with respect to portfolio transactions. The Investment Manager also furnishes or obtains on behalf of each Fund all services necessary for the proper conduct of the Fund’s
business and administration. As compensation for its services to each Fund, the Investment Manager is entitled to a fee, payable monthly and accrued daily , based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Investment Management
Agreement (including the fees paid by each Fund) is essentially identical to the previous investment management agreements entered into between the Investment Manager and each of the Predecessor Funds.
Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Investment Manager receives a fee at the annual rate from each of the Funds as set forth below:
Midas Fund
1.00% of the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets
.95% of average daily net assets over $200 million up to $400 million
.90% of average daily net assets over $400 million up to $600 million
.85% of average daily net assets over $600 million up to $800 million
.80% of average daily net assets over $800 million up to $1 billion
.75% of average daily net assets over $1 billion.
Midas Magic
1.00% of the first $10 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets
7/8 of 1.00% of average daily net assets over $10 million up to $30 million
3/4 of 1.00% of average daily net assets over $30 million up to $150 million
5/8 of 1.00% of average daily net assets over $150 million up to $500 million
1/2 of 1.00% of average daily net assets over $500 million.
The foregoing fees are calculated on the daily value of each Fund’s net assets at the close of each business day. The foregoing fees for the Funds are higher than fees paid by most other investment companies.
The Investment Management Agreement provides that the Investment Manager shall waive all or part of its fee or reimburse a Fund monthly if and to the extent that the aggregate operating expenses of a Fund exceed the
most restrictive limit imposed by any state in which shares of a Fund are qualified for sale, or such lesser amount as may be agreed to by the Board of Trustees and the Investment Manager. Currently, the Funds are not subject to any such state
imposed limitations. Certain expenses, such as brokerage commissions, taxes, interest, distribution fees, certain expenses attributable to investing outside the United States and extraordinary items, are excluded from this limitation.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 , and 2019 , the Funds paid the Investment Manager the following investment advisory fees, reflected in the column, “Amount Paid.” The Investment
Manager did not waive any fees during this time period.
Year
|
Fund Name
|
Amount Paid
|
2017
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$192,512
$135,022
|
2018
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$155,670
$139,726
|
2019
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$161,872
$136,016
|
Reimbursement for Administration
The Investment Manager shall supply the Funds and the Board of Trustees with reports and statistical data, as reasonably requested. In addition, if requested by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, the Investment Manager
or its affiliates may provide services to the Trust or Funds such as, without limitation, accounting, administration, bookkeeping, broker/dealer recordkeeping , clerical, compliance, custody, dividend disbursing, fulfillment of requests for
Fund information, proxy soliciting, securities pricing, registrar, and transfer agent services. Any reports, statistical data, and services so requested, or approved by the Board of Trustees, and supplied or performed will be for the account of the
applicable Fund and the costs and out-of-pocket charges of the Investment Manager and its affiliates in providing such reports, statistical data or services shall be paid by that Fund, subject to periodic reporting to and examination by the
independent Trustees. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 , and 2019 the Funds reimbursed the Investment Manager for such administration services as follows:
Year
|
Fund Name
|
Reimbursement Amount
|
2017
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$116,320
$84,625
|
2018
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$80,846
$79,095
|
2019
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$89,325
$78,425
|
Under the Investment Management Agreement, each Fund assumes and pays all the expenses required for the conduct of its business including, but not limited to: (a) fees of the Investment Manager; (b) fees and
commissions in connection with the purchase and sale of portfolio securities for the Funds; (c) costs, including the interest expense, of borrowing money; (d) fees and premiums for the fidelity bond required by Section 17(g) of the 1940 Act, or
other insurance; (e) taxes levied against the Funds and the expenses of preparing tax returns and reports; (f) auditing fees and expenses; (g) legal fees and expenses (including reasonable fees for legal services rendered to the Funds by the
Investment Manager or its affiliates); (h) salaries and other compensation of (1) any of the Funds’ officers and employees who are not officers, trustees, shareholders or employees of the Investment Manager or any of its affiliates, and (2) the
Funds’ CCO to the extent determined by the independent Trustees; (i) fees and expenses incidental to Trustee and shareholder meetings of the Funds, the preparation and mailings of proxy material, prospectuses, and reports of the Funds to
shareholders, the filing of reports with regulatory bodies, and the maintenance of the Funds’ legal existence; (j) costs of the registration of the Funds’ shares with Federal and state securities authorities (and maintenance of such registration);
(k) payment of dividends; (l) costs of share certificates; (m) fees and expenses of the independent Trustees; (n) fees and expenses for accounting, administration, bookkeeping, broker/dealer recordkeeping , clerical, compliance, custody,
dividend disbursing, reports providing and fulfillment of requests for Fund information, proxy soliciting, securities pricing, registrar, and transfer agent services (including costs and out-of-pocket expenses payable to the Investment Manager or
its affiliates for such services); (o) costs of necessary office space rental and Fund web site development and maintenance; (p) costs of membership dues and charges of investment company industry trade associations; (q) such non-recurring expenses
as may arise, including, without limitation, actions, suits or proceedings affecting the Funds and the legal obligation which the Funds may have to indemnify its officers and Trustees or settlements made; and (r) any and all organizational expenses
of the Funds paid by the Investment Manager, which shall be reimbursed by the Funds at such time or times agreed to by the Funds and the Investment Manager.
The Investment Management Agreement provides that the Investment Manager will not be liable to a Fund or any shareholder of a Fund for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by a
Fund in connection with the matters to which the agreement relates. Nothing contained in the Investment Management Agreement, however, shall be construed to protect the Investment Manager against any liability to a Fund by reason of willful
misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of obligations and duties under the Investment Management Agreement.
The Investment Management Agreement will continue with respect to each Fund for successive periods of twelve months, provided that its continuance is specifically approved at least annually for each Fund by (a) the
Board or by the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund as defined in the 1940 Act, and (b) a vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the Investment Management Agreement, or interested persons of any
such party. The Investment Management Agreement may be terminated without penalty at any time either by a vote of the Board of Trustees or the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act, on 60
days’ written notice to the Investment Manager, or by the Investment Manager on 60 days’ written notice to a Fund, and shall immediately terminate in the event of its assignment.
Performance Driven Properties, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Winco, has granted the Funds a non-exclusive license to use various service marks and domain names including “Midas” under certain terms and
conditions on a royalty free basis. Such license may be withdrawn in the event the Investment Manager or another subsidiary of Winco is not the Funds’ investment manager. If the license is terminated, the Funds will eliminate all reference to
those marks in their corporate name and cease to use any of such service marks or any similar service marks in its business.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
Thomas B. Winmill is the portfolio manager of Midas Fund and Midas Magic. Mr. Winmill receives compensation from the Investment Manager and/or affiliated entities for his services to the Funds. As of
December 31, 2019 , Mr. Winmill’s compensation plan generally consists of base salary, employee benefits plan participation, qualified retirement plan participation, annual bonuses, certain prerequisites, and participation in equity based
compensation plans. A portion of his compensation may be deferred based on criteria established by the Investment Manager, or at the election of the portfolio manager.
The portfolio manager’s base salary is determined annually by level of responsibility and tenure at the Investment Manager or its affiliates. The primary components of the portfolio manager’s annual bonus are based
on (i) number of weeks’ salary paid as annual bonuses to employees generally of the Investment Manager and its affiliates, and (ii) the financial performance of the Investment Manager and its affiliates. A subjective component of the portfolio
manager’s annual bonus is based on his overall contribution to management of the Investment Manager and its affiliates. The portfolio manager may receive an asset level bonus upon assets under management reaching certain levels. The portfolio
manager also may be compensated under equity based compensation plans linked to increases or decreases in the market value of the stock of the parent of the Investment Manager and its affiliates.
The portfolio manager’s compensation plan may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. The portfolio manager’s base pay tends to increase with additional and more complex responsibilities often reflecting
increased assets under management and marketing efforts, which together indirectly link compensation to sales of Fund shares. The asset level bonus, although intended to encourage above average investment performance and account servicing, as well
as lower expense ratios may give rise to potential conflicts of interest by linking compensation to sales. The management of multiple Funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the Funds
and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple Funds and accounts. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for one Fund or
account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by another Fund or account. Securities selected for one Fund or account rather than another Fund or account may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. The management of
personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds’ Code of Ethics will adequately address such conflicts.
In addition, given the multiple roles Mr. Winmill has within the Winco affiliated organization, there are constraints on his time, which may affect his ability to adequately service the Funds as the sole portfolio
manager.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2019 for Thomas B. Winmill relating to other accounts managed where Mr. Winmill is jointly or primarily responsible for day to day management. Mr.
Winmill does not manage any accounts or assets with performance based advisory fees, or other pooled investment vehicles.
Portfolio Manager
|
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
Other Accounts
|
Thomas B. Winmill
|
Number:
|
2
|
N/A
|
7
|
|
Assets (millions):
|
$250
|
N/A
|
$27
|
As of December 31, 2019 , the dollar range of shares beneficially owned by Thomas B. Winmill of Midas Fund was $ 50,001 - $100,000 and of Midas Magic was $100,001
- $500,000.
DISTRIBUTION OF SHARES
Pursuant to a Distribution Agreement, the Distributor, whose address is 11 Hanover Square, New York, NY 10005, acts as principal distributor of each Fund’s shares. Under the Distribution Agreement with the Trust and
on behalf of each Fund, the Distributor uses its best efforts, consistent with its other businesses, to sell shares of each Fund. Fund shares are sold continuously.
Pursuant to the Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”) adopted by the Trust on behalf of each Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, Midas Fund and Midas Magic each pay the Distributor monthly a fee of
0.25% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net assets as compensation for its distribution and service activities. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 , Midas Fund and Midas Magic paid to the Distributor a fee in the amount of $ 40,468
and $ 35,290 , respectively, under the Plan.
In performing distribution and service activities pursuant to the Plan, the Distributor may spend such amounts as it deems appropriate on any activities or expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of Fund
shares or the servicing and maintenance of shareholder accounts, including, but not limited to: advertising, direct mail, and promotional expenses; compensation to the Distributor and its employees; compensation to and expenses, including overhead
and telephone and other communication expenses, of the Distributor, the Investment Manager, the Funds, and selected dealers and their affiliates who engage in or support the distribution of shares or who service shareholder accounts; fulfillment
expenses, including the costs of printing and distributing prospectuses, statements of additional information, and reports for other than existing shareholders; the costs of preparing, printing and distributing sales literature and advertising
materials; and internal costs incurred by the Distributor and allocated by the Distributor to its efforts to distribute shares of a Fund or service shareholder accounts such as office rent and equipment, employee salaries, employee bonuses and
other overhead expenses.
Among other things, the Plan provides that: (1) the Distributor will submit to the Board at least quarterly, and the Board will review, reports regarding all amounts expended under the Plan and the purposes for
which such expenditures were made; (2) the Plan will continue in effect only so long as it is approved at least annually, and any material amendment or agreement related thereto is approved, by the
Board, including those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Funds and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or any agreement related to the Plan (“Plan Trustees”),
acting in person at a meeting called for that purpose, unless terminated by vote of a majority of the Plan Trustees, or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund; (3) payments by a Fund under the Plan shall not be
materially increased without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund; and (4) while the Plan remains in effect, the selection and nomination of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of
the Funds shall be committed to the discretion of the Trustees who are not interested persons of the Funds.
It is the opinion of the Board that the Plan is necessary to maintain a flow of subscriptions to offset redemptions. Redemptions of mutual fund shares are inevitable. If redemptions are not offset by subscriptions,
a fund shrinks in size and its ability to maintain quality shareholder services declines. Eventually, redemptions could cause a fund to become uneconomic. Furthermore, an extended period of significant net redemptions may be detrimental to
orderly management of a portfolio. Offsetting redemptions through sales efforts benefits shareholders by maintaining the viability of a fund. In periods where net sales are achieved, additional benefits may accrue relative to portfolio management
and increased shareholder servicing capability. Increased assets enable a Fund to further diversify its portfolio, which spreads and reduces investment risk while increasing opportunity. In addition, increased assets enable the establishment and
maintenance of a better shareholder servicing staff which can respond more effectively and promptly to shareholder inquiries and needs. While net increases in total assets are desirable, a primary goal of the Plan is to prevent a decline in assets
serious enough to cause disruption of portfolio management and to impair the Funds’ ability to maintain a high level of quality shareholder services.
The Plan increases the overall expense ratio of the Funds; however, a substantial decline in Fund assets is likely to increase the portion of a Fund’s expense ratio comprised of management fees and fixed costs (i.e., costs other than the Plan), while a substantial increase in Fund assets may be expected to reduce the portion of the expense ratio comprised of management fees (reflecting a larger portion of the assets
falling within fee scale down levels), as well as of fixed costs. Nevertheless, the net effect of the Plan is to increase overall expenses. To the extent the Plan maintains a flow of subscriptions to the Funds, there results an immediate and
direct benefit to the Investment Manager by maintaining or increasing its fee revenue base, diminishing the obligation, if any, of the Investment Manager to make an expense reimbursement to a Fund, and eliminating or reducing any contribution made
by the Investment Manager to marketing expenses. Other than as described herein, no Trustee or interested person of a Fund has any direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or any related agreement.
The principal types of activities for which payments are or will be made under the Plan include those incurring charges for compensation, occupancy, telephone, fulfillment, advertising, printing, public relations,
postage, and dealer payments.
During the Funds’ fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 , payments made under the Plan covered the following activities in the following approximate amounts:
Activity
|
Midas Fund
|
Midas Magic
|
|
|
|
Advertising1
|
$1,630
|
$1,500
|
|
|
|
Printing and Mailing Prospectuses2
|
$6,760
|
$6,331
|
|
|
|
Payments to the Third Parties3
|
$531
|
$1,728
|
|
|
|
Compensation of Sales Personnel4
|
$23,780
|
$19,401
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Expenses5
|
$7,786
|
$6,351
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$40,487
|
$35,311
|
1 Including print, video, and public relations expenses.
2 Printing, postage, and fulfillment expenses for prospectuses, shareholder reports, and other Fund literature.
3 Dealer payments for distribution of Funds shares.
4 Distributor personnel.
5 Including allocated occupancy and telephone expenses.
These amounts have been derived by determining the ratio each such category represents to the total expenditures incurred by the Distributor in performing services pursuant to the Plan for such period and then
applying such ratio to the total amount of compensation paid by a Fund and received by the Distributor pursuant to the Plan for such period.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
A Fund’s NAV per share is determined as of the scheduled close of regular trading (regardless of an actual, unscheduled earlier closing due to weather, equipment failure, or other factors) in equity securities on the
New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (normally, 4 p.m. ET, and typically 1 p.m. ET around certain holidays) each day the NYSE is open for trading (“Business Day”). The NYSE is generally closed on the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day, Washington’s Birthday (Presidents’ Day), Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.
Portfolio securities generally are valued by various methods depending on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Most equity securities for which the primary market is in the United States are usually
valued at the official closing price, last sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the closing bid price. Most equity securities for which the primary market is outside the United States are usually valued using the official closing price or
the last sale price in the principal market in which they are traded. If the last sale price on the local exchange is unavailable, the last evaluated quote or closing bid price normally is used. Foreign securities markets may be open on days when
the U.S. markets are closed. For this reason, the value of any foreign securities owned by a Fund could change on a day when shareholders cannot buy or sell shares of the Fund
In the event of an unexpected closing of the primary market or exchange, a security may continue to trade on one or more other markets, and the price as reflected on those other trading venues may be more reflective
of the security’s value than an earlier price from the primary market or exchange. Accordingly, the Funds may seek to use these additional sources of pricing data or information when prices from the primary market or exchange are unavailable, or
are earlier and less representative of current market value.
Gold and silver bullion is valued at 4:00 p.m. ET, at the mean between the last bid and asked quotations of the Bloomberg Composite (NY) Spot Price for that metal. Certain debt securities in which the Funds may
invest may be priced through pricing services that may utilize a matrix pricing system which takes into consideration factors such as yields, prices, maturities, call features, and ratings on comparable securities or according to prices quoted by a
securities dealer that offers pricing services. Open-end investment companies generally are valued at their NAV.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or reliable and other assets may be valued as determined in good faith by the Investment Manager under the direction of or pursuant to procedures
approved by the Board of Trustees, called “fair value pricing.” Due to the inherent uncertainty of valuation, fair value pricing values may differ from the values that would have been used had a readily available and reliable market quotation for
the securities existed. These differences in valuation could be material. A security’s valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. The use of fair value pricing by a Fund may cause the NAV of its shares to differ
from the NAV that would be calculated using market prices. A fair value price is an estimate and there is no assurance that such price will be at or close to the price at which a security is next quoted or traded.
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES
A Fund normally will only issue shares upon payment of the purchase price by check made payable to the Fund’s order in U.S. dollars and drawn on a U.S. bank, electronic funds transfer, or by Federal Reserve wire
transfer, the cost of such wire service to be paid by the shareholder. Cash, third party checks (except for properly endorsed IRA rollover checks), counter checks, starter checks, traveler’s checks, money orders (other than money orders issued by
a bank), credit card checks, and checks drawn on non-U.S. financial institutions will not be accepted. No share certificates will be issued. Shares will be registered in the name of the shareholder or broker or its nominee by book entry in the
stock transfer books of the Fund or its Transfer Agent. Each Fund reserves the right to reject any order, to cancel any order due to nonpayment, to accept initial orders by telephone, and to waive the limit on subsequent orders by telephone, with
respect to any person or class of persons. In order to permit a Fund’s shareholder base to expand, to avoid certain shareholder hardships, to correct transactional errors, and to address similar situations, each Fund may waive or lower the
investment minimums with respect to any person or class of persons. The Funds make no guarantees with respect to available trading vehicles and no promise of a right to make trades via telephone, fax, or internet. Orders to purchase shares are
not binding on a Fund until they are confirmed by the Fund’s Transfer Agent. Each Fund reserves the right to waive any purchase or redemption requirements in its discretion to the extent permitted or required by applicable law.
If an order is canceled because of non-payment or because the purchaser’s check does not clear, the purchaser will be responsible for any loss a Fund incurs. If the purchaser is already a shareholder, the Fund can
redeem shares from the purchaser’s account to reimburse the Fund for any loss. In addition, the purchaser may be prohibited or restricted from placing future purchase orders for shares of the Fund or any of the other Funds.
Each Fund has authorized one or more brokers to accept on its behalf purchase and redemption orders. Such brokers are authorized to designate other intermediaries to accept purchase and redemption orders on each
Fund’s behalf. Each Fund may be deemed to have received a purchase or redemption order when an authorized broker or, if applicable, a broker’s authorized designee, accepts the order. A shareholder’s order will be priced at the Fund’s NAV next
computed after such order is accepted by an authorized broker or the broker’s
authorized designee. Some transactions effected through financial intermediaries may be subject to different terms than those set forth in the Fund’s Prospectus.
Each Fund may redeem for any reason, at any time, at current NAV all shares owned or held by any one shareholder having an aggregate current NAV of any amount, subject to the requirements of applicable law. If not
paid otherwise or waived by the Investment Manager, account charges for the $20 small account fee will be paid by the Fund redeeming shares. Qualified plan accounts offered by the Funds, such as individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) or health
savings accounts (“HSAs”), do not have annual custodial fees. The annual custodial fees for such accounts will be borne by the Fund. IRAs, however, will be subject to a pre-age 59½ distribution/transfer fee of $10 and a plan termination fee of
$20 per IRA. HSAs will be subject to a distribution/transfer fee of $10 and a plan termination fee of $20 per HSA.
Each Fund is designed as a long term investment, and short term trading is discouraged. Short term trading by Fund shareholders may adversely affect the Funds by interfering with portfolio management and increasing
portfolio transaction and administrative costs. To discourage short term trading, a Fund may temporarily suspend or terminate purchases and exchanges by investors or groups of investors who engage in short term trading practices, which the Fund,
the Investment Manager, or the Distributor believes may have an adverse impact on the Fund.
“Late trading” refers to the practice of placing orders to purchase or redeem a mutual fund’s shares with the fund’s transfer agent or an authorized intermediary after the designated time (the “Pricing Time”) as of
which the fund calculates its NAV (usually the scheduled close of regular trading in equity securities on the NYSE, which normally occurs at 4 p.m. ET and, around certain holidays, 1 p.m. ET each day the NYSE is open for trading, unless weather,
equipment failure, or other factors contribute to a trading halt that is effected on a market wide basis), but receiving the price based on the prior calculated NAV. “Late trading” also refers to the practice of placing conditional trade orders
prior to the Pricing Time with the option of withdrawing or confirming the trade orders after the Pricing Time. Late traders gain the possibility of an information advantage based on news after the Pricing Time that could affect the value of a
Fund’s holdings but is not reflected in the NAV pricing for that day. The Investment Manager and the Distributor have established the following policies and procedures to detect and prevent late trading: (1) no associated person of the
Investment Manager or the Distributor may effect or facilitate late trading in the shares of any Fund; (2) the Investment Manager, the Distributor, and their associated persons are prohibited from entering into any agreement or adopting any
practice with the purpose of permitting any person to engage in late trading; (3) all orders for trades in the shares of a Fund that are received after the Pricing Time for the Fund will be submitted for processing and pricing for the next
calculated price; (4) the Investment Manager, the Distributor, the Transfer Agent and their associated persons will not permit an investor, broker, or other intermediary to alter, cancel, or withdraw a trade order in the shares of a Fund after the
Pricing Time for that Fund, except to correct a manifest error and subject to the approval of the CCO; and (5) any associated person of the Investment Manager or the Distributor who becomes aware of any actions taken to effect or facilitate late
trading in the shares of a Fund normally must promptly report those actions to the CCO.
“Market timing” typically refers to the practice of frequent trading in the shares of mutual funds in order to exploit inefficiencies in fund pricing. Market timing transactions include trades in mutual fund shares
that occur when the fund’s NAV does not fully reflect the value of the fund’s holdings – for example, when the fund has in its portfolio particular holdings, such as foreign or thinly traded securities, that are valued on a basis that does not
include the most updated information possible. Each Fund may invest a substantial portion of their assets in foreign securities and may be subject to the risks associated with market timing and short term trading strategies to a greater extent
than funds that do not. Securities trading in overseas markets present time zone arbitrage opportunities when events affecting portfolio securities values occur after the close of the overseas market but prior to the close of the U.S. market.
Market timing can have a dilutive effect on the value of the investments of long term fund shareholders and can increase the transaction costs of a fund, which will be borne by all fund shareholders. In order to assist in the detection and
prevention of market timing that may have an impact on a Fund, the Investment Manager and the Distributor have established the following policies and procedures: (1) the Investment Manager may monitor for market timers and establish criteria by
which to identify potential market timers and to determine whether further action is warranted; (2) the Investment Manager may direct the Transfer Agent to reject any purchase or exchange orders, in whole or in part, including trading orders that
in its opinion may be excessive in frequency and/or amount or otherwise potentially disruptive to the affected Fund(s) (the Investment Manager may consider the trading history of accounts under common ownership or control to determine whether to
direct the Transfer Agent to reject an order); (3) due to the difficulty of identifying whether particular orders placed through banks, brokers, investment representatives, or other financial intermediaries may be excessive in frequency and/or
amount or otherwise potentially disruptive to the affected Fund(s), the Investment Manager may consider all the trades placed in a combined order through a financial intermediary on an omnibus basis as a part of a group and such trades may be
rejected in whole or in part by the affected Fund(s); (4) the Investment Manager or the Distributor in their sole discretion may, from time to time, seek the cooperation of broker-dealers and other third party intermediaries by requesting
information from them regarding the identity of investors who are trading in the Funds, and restricting access to a Fund by a particular investor; and (5) any associated person of the Investment Manager or the Distributor who becomes aware of any
actions taken to undertake, effect, or facilitate a market timing transaction contrary to a representation made in a Fund’s Prospectus or SAI will normally report the actions to the CCO.
If shares of any Fund held for 30 days or less are redeemed or exchanged, the Fund will normally deduct a redemption fee equal to 1% of the NAV of shares redeemed or exchanged. Redemption fees are retained by the
Fund.
Midas Fund
In-Kind Redemptions.
Midas Fund may require redeeming shareholders to accept readily tradable gold or silver bullion, coins, ETF shares, or other Fund holdings (collectively “redemption assets”) in complete or partial payment of
redemptions in instances where so doing may provide a benefit to the Fund. In-kind redemptions are taxed in the same manner to a redeeming shareholder as cash redemptions for federal income tax purposes.
If the Fund elects to dispose of assets through such in-kind redemptions, it would typically inform the Transfer Agent of the assets to be used and the order in which to use them. The Transfer Agent thereafter
normally would honor all redemption requests, in the order received, by distributing the designated assets. Generally, the Transfer Agent would continue to effect all redemption requests for the Fund with in-kind distributions until the designated
assets were exhausted or until the Fund instructs the Transfer Agent otherwise.
The Fund normally may not require a shareholder to accept an asset in an in-kind redemption if the necessary costs of selling the asset by a broker or other institution selected by the Fund (in the form and quantity
distributed to the shareholder) exceed 2% of the asset’s value at the time of the redemption.
The Fund may select a broker or other institution in its sole discretion for shareholders to sell the assets distributed to them in an in-kind redemption. In the event that a shareholder selects another broker or
institution to sell assets distributed to such shareholder, the Fund to the extent practicable normally would deliver the assets to the shareholder as such shareholder directs.
The Fund will seek to inform the shareholder of the delivery of the redemption assets to such an account at or about the time of the in-kind redemption. Once the shareholder is informed of such delivery, all risk of
transfer and ownership of such redemption assets is assumed by such shareholder.
The Fund has also adopted the following operating policies with respect to in-kind redemptions:
•
|
the Fund shall seek to identify before 4:00 p.m. ET of the day on which such in-kind redemptions may be required, assets held by the Fund that are available for in-kind redemption;
|
•
|
the asset price used to effect the redemption shall be the respective asset price used to calculate the NAV of the shares being redeemed; and
|
•
|
in-kind redemptions may be limited to assets for which market quotations are readily available.
|
ALLOCATION OF BROKERAGE
Each Fund seeks to obtain prompt execution of orders at the most favorable net prices. Transactions are directed to brokers and dealers qualified to execute orders or provide brokerage and research services. The
Investment Manager may also allocate portfolio transactions to broker/dealers that remit a portion of their commissions as a credit against the charges of Fund service providers. No formula exists and no arrangement is made with or promised to any
broker/dealer that commits either a stated volume or percentage of brokerage business based on brokerage and research services furnished to the Investment Manager. Although Fund transactions in some securities may be conducted with dealers acting
as principals at net prices incurring little or no brokerage costs, in other circumstances the Fund may engage a broker as agent for a commission to effect transactions for such similar securities. Purchases of securities from underwriters include
a commission or concession paid by the issuer to the underwriter, and purchases from dealers include a spread between the bid and asked price. While the Investment Manager generally seeks competitive spreads or commissions, the Funds will not
necessarily be paying the lowest spread or commission available.
The Investment Manager directs portfolio transactions to broker/dealers for execution on terms and at rates which it believes, in good faith, to be reasonable in view of the overall nature and quality of services
provided by a particular broker/dealer, including, but not limited to, brokerage and research services. With respect to brokerage and research services, consideration may be given in the selection of broker/dealers to brokerage or research
provided and payment may be made for a fee higher than that charged by another broker/dealer which does not furnish brokerage or research services or which furnishes brokerage or research services deemed to be of lesser value, so long as the
criteria of Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act, or other applicable laws are met. Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act specifies that a person with investment discretion shall not be “deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached a fiduciary duty”
solely because such person has caused the account to pay a higher commission than the lowest available under certain circumstances. To obtain the benefit of Section 28(e), the person so exercising investment discretion must make a good faith
determination that the commissions paid are “reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided ... viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or his overall responsibilities with respect to the accounts
as to which he exercises investment discretion.” Thus, although the Investment Manager may direct portfolio transactions without necessarily obtaining the lowest price at which such broker/dealer, or another, may be
willing to do business, the Investment Manager seeks the best value to the Funds on each trade that circumstances in the market place permit, including the value inherent in ongoing relationships with quality
brokers. Research services furnished by broker/dealers through which a Fund effects securities transactions may be used by the Investment Manager in servicing its other accounts, if any; accordingly, not all the services may be used by the
Investment Manager in connection with the Funds.
Sometimes it is not possible to determine the extent to which commissions that reflect an element of value for brokerage or research services might exceed commissions that would be payable for execution alone, nor
can the value of such services to a Fund be measured in some cases. There is no certainty that such services so acquired will be beneficial to the Funds. These services may include brokerage and research services as defined in Section 28(e)(3) of
the 1934 Act, which presently include: (1) furnishing advice as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities and the availability of securities or purchasers or sellers of securities;
(2) furnishing analyses and reports concerning issuers, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy, and the performance of accounts; and (3) effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto
(such as clearance, settlement, and custody). Pursuant to arrangements with certain broker/dealers, such broker/dealers provide and pay for various research oriented computer hardware, software, market pricing information, investment subscriptions
and memberships, and other third party and internal research of assistance to the Investment Manager in the performance of its investment decision making responsibilities for transactions effected by such broker/dealers for the Funds. Commission
“soft dollars” may be used only for brokerage and research services provided directly or indirectly by the broker/dealer and cash payments are not to be made by such broker/dealers to the Investment Manager. To the extent that commission “soft
dollars” do not result in the provision of any brokerage and research services by a broker/dealer to whom such commissions are paid, the commissions, nevertheless, are the property of such broker/dealer. To the extent any such services are
utilized by the Investment Manager for other than the performance of its investment decision making responsibilities, the Investment Manager makes an appropriate allocation of the cost of such services according to their use.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019 , Midas Fund and Midas Magic paid the following brokerage commissions:
Year
|
Fund Name
|
Total
Amount Paid*
|
|
|
|
2017
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$19,135
$4,897
|
|
|
|
2018
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$29,929
$6,780
|
|
|
|
2019
|
Midas Fund
Midas Magic
|
$10,137
$3,545
|
*The increase in the aggregate dollar amount of brokerage commissions paid by Midas Fund from 2017 to 2018 can be attributed to increased re-positioning of the portfolio and the decrease in the aggregate
dollar amount of brokerage commissions paid by Midas Fund from 2018 to 2019 can be attributed to decreased re-positioning of the portfolio. The increase in the aggregate dollar amount of brokerage commissions
paid by Midas Magic from 2017 to 2018 can be attributed to increased re-positioning of the portfolio and the decrease in the aggregate dollar amount of brokerage commissions paid by Midas Magic from 2018 to 2019 can be attributed to decreased
re-positioning of the portfolio .
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 , Midas Fund and Midas Magic paid $ 1,506 and $ 2,572 , respectively, in brokerage commissions to firms for providing research services involving
approximately $ 2,166,578 and $ 5,277,259 , respectively, of transactions. The provision of third party research services was not necessarily a factor in the placement of all of this business with such firms; however, as a general
matter, trades may be placed on behalf of the Funds with firms that provide research, subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
The Funds did not acquire securities of its regular brokers or dealers or of their parents (if applicable) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 .
Bunched Trades
Investment decisions for a Fund are made independently based on each Fund’s investment objectives and policies. The same investment decision, however, may be made for two or more Funds in the Fund Complex. In such
a case, the Investment Manager may combine orders for two or more Funds for a particular security (a “bunched trade”) so that all Funds participating in the bunched trade receive the same execution price with all transaction costs (e.g., commissions) shared on a pro rata basis, subject to de minimis exceptions. In
the event that there are insufficient securities to satisfy all orders, the partial amount executed may be allocated among participating Funds pro rata on the basis of order size. In the event of a partial
fill and the portfolio manager does not deem the pro rata allocation of a specified number of shares to a particular Fund to be sufficient, the portfolio manager may waive in writing such allocation. In
such event, the Fund’s pro rata allocation may be reallocated to the other Funds that participated in the bunched trade. Following trade execution, portfolio managers may determine in certain instances that
it may be fair and equitable to allocate securities purchased or sold in such trade in a manner other than that which may follow from a mechanical application of the procedures outlined above. Such instances may include: (i) partial fills and
special Funds or accounts (in the event that there are insufficient securities to satisfy all orders, it may be fair and equitable to give designated Funds with special investment objectives and policies some degree of priority over other types of
Funds); or (ii) unsuitable or inappropriate investment (it may be appropriate to deviate from the allocation determined by application of these procedures if it is determined before the final allocation that the security in question may be
unsuitable or inappropriate for one or more of the Funds originally designated). While in some cases this practice could have a detrimental effect upon the price or quantity of the security available with respect to a Fund, the Investment Manager
believes that a bunched trade can generally result in more equitable execution and prices. Research services provided by brokers through which the Funds effect securities transactions may be used by the Fund’s Investment Manager in servicing all
of its Funds and other accounts and not all of these services may be used by the Investment Manager in connection with the Funds. The accounts aggregated may include those accounts in which the Investment Manager’s officers, directors, agents,
employees, or affiliates own interests.
Other
A Fund is not obligated to deal with any particular broker/dealer. Certain broker/dealers that Funds in the Fund Complex do business with may, from time to time, own more than 5% of the publicly traded Class A
non-voting common stock of Winco, the parent of the Investment Manager, or shares of Winco’s publicly traded affiliates.
A Fund’s portfolio turnover rate may vary from year to year and will not be a limiting factor when the Investment Manager deems portfolio changes appropriate. The portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing
the lesser of a Fund’s annual purchases or sales of portfolio securities (exclusive of purchases or sales of securities whose maturities at the time of acquisition were one year or less) by the monthly average value of securities in the portfolio
during the year. A higher portfolio turnover rate involves correspondingly greater transaction costs and increases the potential for recognition of net capital gains and resulting larger taxable distributions to shareholders.
Certain broker/dealers are paid a fee for recordkeeping , shareholder communications, and other services provided by them to investors purchasing shares of a Fund through the “no transaction fee” or other
programs offered by such brokers. This fee is based on the value of the investments in a Fund made by such brokers on behalf of investors participating in such programs. The Board has authorized the Investment Manager to place Fund brokerage
transactions with such brokers on the same basis as other brokers. Commissions earned by such brokers from executing portfolio transactions on behalf of a Fund may be credited by them against the fee they charge a Fund, on a basis which has
resulted from negotiations between the Investment Manager and such brokers.
DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES
Taxation of the Funds
Each Fund intends to continue to qualify as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To qualify for treatment as a RIC, each Fund (which is treated as a separate RIC for federal tax purposes) must distribute to its
shareholders for each taxable year at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (consisting generally of net investment income, the excess of net short term capital gain over net long term capital loss (“short term capital gain”), and net
gains and losses from certain foreign currency transactions, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) (“Distribution Requirement”) and must meet several additional requirements. With respect to each Fund, these
requirements include the following: (1) the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from (i) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or
foreign currencies, or other income (including gains from options, futures, or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies, and (ii) net income from an interest in a “qualified publicly
traded partnership” (“QPTP”) (“Income Requirement”); and (2) at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (i) at least 50% of the value of its total assets must be represented by cash and cash items, government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and that does not represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities (equity
securities of QPTPs being considered voting securities for these purposes) (“50% Diversification Requirement”), and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets may be invested in (a) securities (other than government securities or
securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, (b) securities (other than securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers the Fund controls that are determined to be
engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses, or (c) securities of one or more QPTPs (collectively, “Diversification Requirements”).
Midas Fund may invest in gold and silver, other precious metals, and options and futures thereon and ETFs that invest therein. The Fund’s gains derived from its investments in options or futures contracts on
precious metals generally will constitute “qualifying income” for purposes of the Income Requirement only if they are realized in connection with certain hedging transactions. Moreover, direct investments in precious metals would have adverse tax
consequences for the Fund and its shareholders if it either (1) derived more than 10% of its gross income in any taxable year from gains from the disposition of precious metals and from other income that does not qualify under the Income
Requirement or (2) held precious metals in such quantities that it failed to satisfy the 50% Diversification Requirement for any quarter of its taxable year. The Fund intends to continue to manage its portfolio and sources of income so as to avoid
failing to satisfy those requirements for these reasons.
If a Fund failed to qualify for treatment as a RIC for any taxable year – either (1) by failing to satisfy the Distribution Requirement, even if it satisfied the Income and Diversification Requirements, or (2) by
failing to satisfy the Income Requirement and/or either Diversification Requirement and was unable, or determined not to, cure a failure to satisfy any of the Income and Diversification Requirements, as long as the failure was “due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect” and the Fund paid a deductible tax calculated in accordance with those provisions and met certain other requirements – it would be taxed as a regular corporation on the full amount of its taxable income for
that year without being able to deduct the distributions it made to its shareholders. In addition, the shareholders would treat all those distributions, including distributions of net capital gain (i.e., the
excess of net long term capital gain over net short term capital loss), as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits which (a), for individual and certain other non-corporate shareholders, would be treated as “qualified dividend
income” as defined in the Prospectus (“QDI”), provided such shareholders satisfy certain holding period requirements , and thus would be taxable for federal tax purposes at the rates applicable to long term capital gain and (b) in the case
of corporate shareholders that met certain holding period and other requirements regarding their Fund shares, would be eligible for the dividends received deduction as described there. In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize
unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying for RIC treatment.
If, at any time when any borrowings deemed “Senior Securities” under the 1940 Act are outstanding, a Fund does not meet (i) the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act, or (ii) if there are Senior Securities
outstanding that have been rated by any rating agency, any additional requirements imposed by such rating agency, the Fund will usually be required to suspend distributions to holders of its common Shares until the asset coverage is restored. Such
a suspension may prevent the Fund from satisfying the Distribution Requirement (that is, distributing at least 90% of its investment company taxable income) and therefore jeopardize its qualification for taxation as a RIC or cause it to incur
income tax or Excise Tax (as defined below) liability on the undistributed taxable income (including gain), or both. On a failure to meet any of those asset coverage requirements, the Fund may, in its sole discretion, purchase or redeem any Senior
Securities in order to maintain or restore the requisite asset coverage and avoid the adverse consequences to the Fund and its shareholders of failing to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC. There can be no assurance, however, that any such
redemption would achieve those objectives.
Each Fund will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax (“Excise Tax”) to the extent it fails to distribute by the end of any calendar year substantially all of its ordinary income for that year and capital gain
net income for the one-year period generally ended on October 31 of that year, plus certain other amounts.
Dividends and interest a Fund receives, and gains it realizes, on foreign securities may be subject to income, withholding, or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S. possessions that would reduce the total
return on its securities. Tax treaties between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate those taxes, however, and many foreign countries do not impose taxes on capital gains in respect of investments by foreign investors.
A Fund may invest in the stock of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). A PFIC is any foreign corporation (with certain exceptions) that, in general, meets either of the following tests for a taxable
year: (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive or (2) an average of at least 50% of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Under certain circumstances, a Fund that holds stock of a PFIC will be subject to
federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” it receives on the stock or of any gain on its disposition of the stock (collectively, “PFIC income”), plus interest thereon, even if the Fund distributes the PFIC income as a taxable
dividend to its shareholders. The balance of the PFIC income will be included in the Fund’s investment company taxable income and, accordingly, will not be taxable to it to the extent it distributes that income to its shareholders. A Fund’s
distributions attributable to PFIC income will not normally be eligible to be treated as QDI.
If a Fund invests in a PFIC and elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then in lieu of the Fund’s incurring the foregoing tax and interest obligation, the Fund will be required to include in
income each taxable year its pro rata share of the QEF’s annual ordinary earnings and net capital gain -- which the Fund most likely would have to distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid
imposition of the Excise Tax -- even if the Fund did not receive distributions from the QEF. In most instances it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to make this election because of certain requirements thereof.
Each Fund may elect to “mark-to-market” any stock in a PFIC it owns at the end of its taxable year. “Marking-to-market,” in this context, means including in gross income each taxable year (and treating as ordinary
income) the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock over a Fund’s adjusted basis therein as of the end of that year. Pursuant to the election, a Fund also would be allowed to deduct (as an ordinary, not a capital, loss) the excess,
if any, of its adjusted basis in PFIC stock over the fair market value thereof as of the taxable year-end, but only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains with respect to that stock the Fund included in income for prior taxable years under
the election. A Fund’s adjusted basis in each PFIC’s stock subject to the election would be adjusted to reflect the amounts of income included and deductions taken thereunder.
Investors should be aware that a Fund may not be able, at the time it acquires a foreign corporation’s shares, to ascertain whether the corporation is a PFIC and that a foreign corporation may become a PFIC after a
Fund acquires shares therein. While each Fund generally will seek to minimize its investments in PFIC shares, and to make appropriate elections when they are available, to minimize the tax consequences detailed above, there are no guarantees that
each Fund will be able to do so.
A Fund’s use of hedging strategies, such as writing (selling) and purchasing options and futures and entering into forward contracts, involves complex rules that will determine for income tax purposes the amount,
character, and timing of recognition of the gains and losses the Fund realizes in connection therewith. Gains from the disposition of foreign currencies (except certain gains that may be excluded by future regulations), and gains from options,
futures, and forward contracts a Fund derives with respect to its business of investing in securities or foreign currencies, will be treated as “qualifying income” under the Income Requirement.
Some futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, and “nonequity” options (i.e., certain listed options, such as those on a “broad-based” securities index) – except any
“securities futures contract” that is not a “dealer securities futures contract” (both as defined in the Code) and any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor, commodity swap, equity swap, equity index
swap, credit default swap, or similar agreement – in which a Fund invests may be subject to Code section 1256 (collectively, “section 1256 contracts”). Any section 1256 contracts a Fund holds at the end of its taxable year (and generally for
purposes of the Excise Tax, on October 31 of each year) must be “marked-to-market” (that is, treated as having been sold at market value) for federal income tax purposes, with the result that unrealized gains or losses will be treated as though
they were realized. Sixty percent of any net gain or loss recognized as a result of these deemed sales, and 60% of any net realized gain or loss from any actual sales, of Section 1256 contracts will be treated as long term capital gain or loss;
the remainder will be treated as short term capital gain or loss. These rules may operate to increase the amount that a Fund must distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement (i.e., with respect to
the portion treated as short term capital gain, which will be taxable to its shareholders as ordinary income when distributed to them), and to increase the net capital gain the Fund recognizes, without in either case increasing the cash available
to it. A Fund may elect to exclude certain transactions from the operation of section 1256, although doing so may have the effect of increasing the relative proportion of short term capital gain (as noted above, distributions of which are taxable
to its shareholders as ordinary income when distributed to them) and/or increasing the amount of dividends it must distribute to meet the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.
If a Fund has an “appreciated financial position” -- generally, an interest (including an interest through an option, futures or forward contract, or short sale) with respect to any stock, debt instrument (other than
“straight debt”), or partnership interest the fair market value of which exceeds its adjusted basis -- and enters into a “constructive sale” of the position, the Fund will be treated as having made an actual sale thereof, with the result that it
will recognize gain at that time. A constructive sale generally consists of a short sale, an offsetting notional principal contract, or a futures or forward contract a Fund or a related person enters into with respect to the same or substantially
identical property. In addition, if the appreciated financial position is itself a short sale or such a contract, acquisition of the underlying property or substantially identical property will be deemed a constructive sale. The foregoing will
not apply, however, to any Fund’s transaction during any taxable year that otherwise would be treated as a constructive sale if the transaction is closed within 30 days after the end of that year and the Fund holds the appreciated financial
position unhedged for 60 days after that closing (i.e., at no time during that 60-day period is the Fund’s risk of loss regarding that position reduced by reason of certain specified transactions with
respect to substantially identical or related property, such as having an option to sell, being contractually obligated to sell, making a short sale, or granting an option to buy substantially identical stock or securities).
Each Fund may acquire zero coupon securities or other securities issued with original issue discount (“OID”). As a holder of those securities, each Fund must include in its gross income the OID that accrues on the
securities during the taxable year, even if it receives no corresponding payment on them during the year. Because each Fund annually must distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income (including accrued OID) to satisfy the
Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax, a Fund may be required in a particular year to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of cash it actually receives. Those distributions will be made
from a Fund’s cash assets or, if necessary, from the proceeds of sales of its securities. A Fund may realize capital gains or losses from those sales, which would increase or decrease its investment company taxable income and/or net capital gain.
Income that a Fund derives from a company principally engaged in the real estate industry that is classified for federal tax purposes as a partnership (and not as a corporation or real estate investment trust
(“REIT”)) and is not a QPTP will be treated as qualifying income under the Income Requirement only to the extent it would be qualifying income if realized directly by the Fund in the same manner as realized by that company.
Each Fund may invest in REITs that (1) hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or (2) engage in mortgage securitization transactions that cause the REITs to be taxable mortgage
pools (“TMPs”) or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP. A portion of the net income allocable to REMIC residual interest holders may be an “excess inclusion.” The Code authorizes the issuance of regulations dealing with the taxation and
reporting of excess inclusion income of REITs and RICs that hold residual REMIC interests and of REITs, or qualified REIT subsidiaries, that are TMPs. Although those regulations have not yet been issued, the U.S. Treasury Department and the
Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) have issued a notice (“Notice”) announcing that, pending the issuance of further guidance, the IRS would apply the principles in the following paragraphs to all excess inclusion income, whether from REMIC
residual interests or TMPs.
The Notice provides that a REIT must (1) determine whether it or its qualified REIT subsidiary (or a part of either) is a TMP and, if so, calculate the TMP’s excess inclusion income under a “reasonable method,”
(2) allocate its excess inclusion income to its shareholders generally in proportion to dividends paid, (3) inform shareholders that are not “disqualified organizations” (i.e., governmental units and tax
exempt entities that are not subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”)) of the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated thereto, (4) pay tax (at the highest federal income tax rate imposed on
corporations) on the excess inclusion income allocated to its disqualified organization shareholders, and (5) apply the withholding tax provisions with respect to the excess inclusion part of dividends paid to foreign persons without regard to any
treaty exception or reduction in tax rate. Excess inclusion income allocated to certain tax exempt entities (including qualified retirement plans, IRAs, and public charities) constitutes UBTI to them.
A RIC with excess inclusion income is subject to rules identical to those in clauses (2) through (5) (substituting “that are nominees” for “that are not ‘disqualified organizations’” in clause (3) and inserting
“record shareholders that are” after “its” in clause (4)). The Notice further provides that a RIC is not required to report the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated to its shareholders that are not nominees, except that
(1) a RIC with excess inclusion income from all sources that exceeds 1% of its gross income must do so and (2) any other RIC must do so by taking into account only excess inclusion income allocated to the RIC from REITs the excess inclusion income
of which exceeded 3% of its dividends. Each Fund will not invest directly in REMIC residual interests and does not intend to invest in REITs that, to its knowledge, invest in those interests or are TMPs or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is
a TMP.
Qualified REIT dividends that an investor receives directly from a REIT are generally eligible for the 20% qualified business income deduction. The IRS has issued proposed Treasury
Regulations that, if finalized as proposed, would permit a dividend or part of a dividend paid by a RIC and reported as a “section 199A dividend” to be treated by the recipient as a qualified REIT dividend for purposes of the 20% qualified
business income deduction. These proposed regulations may be relied upon until they are changed or finalized.
Taxation of the Funds’ Shareholders
The portion of Fund dividends, if any, derived from interest on certain U.S. government securities may be exempt from state and local personal income taxes, subject in some states to minimum investment or reporting
requirements the Fund must meet. However, income from repurchase agreements and interest on mortgage backed U.S. government securities generally are not so exempt.
If a shareholder purchases shares of a Fund within 30 days before or after selling, exchanging, or redeeming other shares of that Fund at a loss, all or part of that loss will not be deductible and instead
will increase the basis in the newly purchased shares. If Fund shares are sold at a loss after being held for six months or less, the loss will be treated as long term, instead of short term, capital loss to the extent of any capital gain
distributions received on those shares.
Each Fund is required to withhold an amount determined under Code Section 3406 of all dividends, net capital gain distributions, and redemption proceeds (regardless of the extent to which gain or loss may be
realized) otherwise payable to any individuals and certain other non-corporate shareholders who do not provide the Fund with a correct taxpayer identification number and make certain certifications. Withholding is also required from dividends and
other net capital gain distributions otherwise payable to such shareholders who are subject to backup withholding for any other reason.
Dividends a Fund pays to a foreign shareholder, other than (1) dividends paid to a foreign shareholder whose ownership of shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business that the shareholder carries on
and (2) capital gain distributions paid to a nonresident alien individual who is physically present in the United States for no more than 182 days during the taxable year, generally will be subject to a federal withholding tax of 30% (or lower
treaty rate).
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), a Fund may be required to withhold a generally nonrefundable 30% tax on (i) distributions of investment company taxable income and (ii) distributions of net
capital gain and the gross proceeds of a sale, redemption or exchange of Fund shares to (A) certain “foreign financial institutions” unless such foreign financial institution agrees to verify, monitor, and report to the IRS the identity of certain
of its accountholders, among other items (or unless such entity is otherwise deemed compliant under the terms of an intergovernmental agreement between the United States and the entity’s country of residence), and (B) certain “non-financial foreign
entities” unless such entity certifies to the Funds that it does not have any substantial U.S. owners or provides the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of each substantial U.S. owner, among other items. In December 2018, the IRS
released proposed regulations that would eliminate FATCA withholding on Fund distributions of net capital gain and payment of
gross proceeds from a sale , exchange, or redemption of Fund shares. Although taxpayers are entitled to rely on these proposed regulations until they are finalized, these proposed regulations are subject to
change and may not be finalized in their proposed form. This FATCA withholding tax could also affect a Fund’s return on its investments in foreign securities or affect a shareholder’s return if the shareholder holds its Fund shares through a
foreign intermediary. You are urged to consult your tax adviser regarding the application of this FATCA withholding tax to your investment in the Funds and the potential certification, compliance, due diligence, reporting, and withholding
obligations to which you may become subject in order to avoid this withholding tax.
Each Fund has chosen the average basis method as its default basis determination method for Fund shares that shareholders acquired or acquire after December 31, 2011 (“Covered Shares”). Under the average basis
method, all of the Covered Share purchase costs are added together in an aggregate cost amount. The basis per Covered Share is then determined by dividing the aggregate cost amount by the total Covered Shares in the account. The basis of redeemed
Covered Shares is determined by multiplying the number of those shares by the basis per Covered Share. Each Fund’s default basis determination method will be used unless a Fund shareholder selects a different IRS-approved basis determination
method. If a shareholder prefers another basis determination method (such as a specific identification method), he or she can elect the preferred method by sending a letter of instruction to Midas Funds, c/o Ultimus Asset Services, LLC, P.O. Box
46707, Cincinnati, OH 45246-0707. For overnight express mail and courier: Midas Funds, c/o Ultimus Asset Services, LLC, 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati, OH 45246. The basis determination method a Fund shareholder elects may not be
changed with respect to a redemption of Covered Shares after the settlement date of the redemption.
In addition to the requirement to report the gross proceeds from a redemption of shares, each Fund (or its administrative agent) must report to the IRS and furnish to its shareholders the basis information for
Covered Shares and indicate whether they had a short term (one year or less) or long term (more than one year) holding period. Fund shareholders should consult with their tax advisors to determine the best IRS accepted basis determination method
for their tax situation and to obtain more information about how the basis reporting law applies to them.
*****
The foregoing is only a general summary of some of the important federal income tax considerations generally affecting the Funds and their shareholders. Changes in tax laws, potentially with retroactive effect,
could impact a Fund’s investments or the tax consequences to you of investing in a Fund. No attempt is made to present a complete explanation of the federal income tax treatment of the Funds’ activities, and this discussion is not intended as a
substitute for careful tax planning. Accordingly, potential investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors for more detailed information and for information regarding any state, local, or foreign taxes applicable to the Funds and to
dividends and other distributions therefrom.
CAPITAL STOCK INFORMATION
The Trust may issue additional series of shares. Currently, the Funds each offer only one class of shares, but the Board of Trustees is authorized to create additional classes and series.
Fund shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share and a fractional vote for each fraction of a share they own. Voting rights are not cumulative in the election of Trustees. All shares of a Fund are fully
paid and non-assessable and have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares may be redeemed from a Fund at their then current NAV on any day that the Fund is open for business.
The Funds do not hold annual meetings of shareholders; however, certain significant corporate matters, such as the approval of a new investment advisory agreement or a change in a fundamental investment policy, which
require shareholder approval, will be presented to shareholders at a meeting called by the Board for such purpose.
Special meetings of shareholders may be called for any purpose upon receipt by the Funds of a request in writing signed by shareholders holding not less than 25% of all shares entitled to vote at such meeting,
provided certain conditions stated in the Trust’s by-laws (“Bylaws”) are met. There will normally be no meeting of the shareholders for the purpose of electing Trustees until such time as less than a majority of Trustees holding office have been
elected by shareholders, at which time the Trustees then in office will call a shareholders’ meeting for the election of Trustees. To the extent that Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act applies to a Fund, the Trustees are required to call a meeting of
shareholders for the purpose of voting upon the question of removal of any Trustee when requested in writing to do so by the shareholders of record of not less than 10% of that Fund’s outstanding shares.
On certain matters such as the election of Trustees, all shares of each of the Funds vote together as a single class. On other matters affecting a particular Fund, the shares of that Fund vote together as a separate
class, such as with respect to a change in an investment restriction of a particular Fund, except that as to matters for which a separate vote of a class is required by the 1940 Act or which affects the interests of one or more particular classes,
the affected shareholders vote as a separate class. In voting on an investment management agreement, approval by the shareholders of a Fund is effective as to that Fund whether or not enough votes are received from the shareholders of the other
Fund to approve the investment management agreement for the other Fund.
REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS
Each Fund issues, at least semi-annually, a report to its shareholders including a list of investments held and statements of assets and liabilities, operations, and changes in net assets of each Fund. Each Fund’s
fiscal year ends on December 31.
CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT
HNB, 7 Easton Oval EA4E70, Columbus, OH 43219, has been retained to act as Custodian of each Fund’s investments (except gold bullion and other precious metals, if any) and may appoint one or more subcustodians. The
Custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of Fund assets. Ultimus Asset Services, LLC, P.O. Box 46707, Cincinnati, OH 45246-0707, acts as the Funds Transfer and Dividend Disbursing Agent and performs accounting and tax services for the Funds.
The Funds and/or the Distributor have entered into certain agreements with third party service providers (“Recordkeepers”) pursuant to which the Funds participate in various “no transaction fee” and other
distribution programs offered by the Recordkeepers and pursuant to which the Recordkeepers provide distribution services, shareholder services, and/or co-transfer agency services. The fees of such Recordkeepers are charged to a Fund for
co-transfer agency services and to the Distributor for distribution and shareholder services and allocated between the Distributor and the Fund in a manner deemed equitable by the Board of Trustees. Cash compensation may also be paid to
Recordkeepers for inclusion of the Funds on a sales list, including a preferred or select sales list, in other sales programs, or as an expense reimbursement in cases where the Recordkeeper provides shareholder services to the Funds’ shareholders.
The Investment Manager may also pay cash compensation in the form of finder’s fees that vary depending on the dollar amount of the shares sold.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP (“Tait, Weller”), Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street, Suite 2900, Philadelphia, PA 19102, is each Fund’s IRPAF. Tait, Weller audits each Fund’s financial statements annually.
APPENDIX A
RATINGS DEFINITIONS
SHORT-TERM RATINGS
S&P Global Ratings Issue Credit Rating Definitions
An S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific
class of financial obligations, or a specific financial program (including ratings on medium-term note programs and commercial paper programs). It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of credit
enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the currency in which the obligation is denominated. The opinion reflects S&P’s view of the obligor’s capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due, and
this opinion may assess terms, such as collateral security and subordination, which could affect ultimate payment in the event of default.
Issue credit ratings can be either long-term or short-term. Short-term ratings are generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market. Short-term ratings are also
used to indicate the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to put features on long-term obligations. Medium-term notes are assigned long-term ratings.
S&P’s Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings
A-1
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are
designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong
A-2
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s
capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet its financial
commitments on the obligation.
B
A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing
uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.
C
A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the
obligation.
D
A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due,
unless S&P believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a
bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.
SPUR (S&P Underlying Rating)
A SPUR is an opinion about the stand-alone capacity of an obligor to pay debt service on a credit-enhanced debt issue, without giving effect to the enhancement that applies to it. These ratings are published only at
the request of the debt issuer or obligor with the designation SPUR to distinguish them from the credit-enhanced rating that applies to the debt issue. S&P maintains surveillance of an issue with a published SPUR.
Dual Ratings
Dual ratings may be assigned to debt issues that have a put option or demand feature. The first component of the rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second component
of the rating addresses only the demand feature. The first component of the rating can relate to either a short-term or long-term transaction and accordingly use either short-term or long-term rating symbols. The second component of the rating
relates to the put option and is assigned a short-term rating symbol (for example, ‘AAA/A-1+’ or ‘A-1+/A-1’). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, the U.S. municipal short-term note rating symbols are used for the first component of the
rating (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’).
The analyses, including ratings, of S&P and its affiliates (together, S&P) are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell
any securities or make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update any information following publication. Users of ratings or other analyses should not rely on them in making any investment decision. S&P’s opinions
and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, it does not
perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Ratings and other opinions may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn at any time.
Active Qualifiers
S&P may also assign qualifiers when
appropriate and uses the following qualifiers that limit the scope of a rating. The structure of the transaction can require the use of a qualifier such as a ‘p’ qualifier, which indicates the rating addresses the principal portion of the
obligation only. A qualifier appears as a suffix and is part of the rating.
1. Federal deposit insurance limit: ‘L’ qualifier
Ratings qualified with ‘L’ apply only to amounts invested up to federal deposit insurance limits.
2. Principal: ‘p’ qualifier
This suffix is used for issues in which the credit factors, the terms, or both that determine the likelihood of receipt of payment of principal are different from the credit factors, terms, or both that determine the likelihood of receipt of
interest on the obligation. The ‘p’ suffix indicates that the rating addresses the principal portion of the obligation only and that the interest is not rated.
3. Preliminary ratings: ‘prelim’ qualifier
Preliminary ratings, with the ‘prelim’ suffix, may be assigned to obligors or obligations, including financial programs, in the circumstances described below. Assignment of a final rating is conditional on the receipt by S&P of appropriate
documentation. S&P reserves the right not to issue a final rating. Moreover, if a final rating is issued, it may differ from the preliminary rating.
•
|
Preliminary ratings may be assigned to obligations, most commonly structured and project finance issues, pending receipt of final documentation and legal opinions.
|
•
|
Preliminary ratings may be assigned to obligations that will likely be issued upon the obligor’s emergence from bankruptcy or similar reorganization, based on late-stage reorganization plans, documentation, and discussions with the
obligor. Preliminary ratings may also be assigned to the obligors. These ratings consider the anticipated general credit quality of the reorganized or post-bankruptcy issuer as well as attributes of the anticipated obligation(s).
|
•
|
Preliminary ratings may be assigned to entities that are being formed or that are in the process of being independently established when, in S &P’s opinion, documentation is close to final. Preliminary ratings may also be
assigned to the obligations of these entities.
|
•
|
Preliminary ratings may be assigned when a previously unrated entity is undergoing a well-formulated restructuring, recapitalization, significant financing, or other transformative event, generally at the point that investor or lender
commitments are invited. The preliminary rating may be assigned to the entity and to its proposed obligation(s). These preliminary ratings consider the anticipated general credit quality of the obligor, as well as attributes of the
anticipated obligation(s), assuming successful completion of the transformative event. Should the transformative event not occur, S&P would likely withdraw these preliminary ratings.
|
•
|
A preliminary recovery rating may be assigned to an obligation that has a preliminary issue credit rating.
|
4. Termination structures: ‘t’ qualifier
This symbol indicates termination structures that are designed to honor their contracts to full maturity or, should certain events occur, to terminate and cash settle all their contracts before their final maturity date.
5. Counterparty instrument rating: ‘cir’ qualifier
This symbol indicates a counterparty instrument rating (CIR), which is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an issuer in a securitization structure with respect to a specific financial obligation to a counterparty (including
interest rate swaps, currency swaps, and liquidity facilities). The CIR is determined on an ultimate payment basis; these opinions do not take into account timeliness of payment.
Inactive Qualifiers
Inactive qualifiers are no longer applied or outstanding.
1. Contingent upon final documentation: ‘*’ inactive qualifier
This symbol indicated that the rating was contingent upon S &P’s receipt of an executed copy of the escrow agreement or closing documentation confirming investments and cash flows. Discontinued use in August 1998.
2. Termination of obligation to tender: ‘c’ inactive qualifier
This qualifier was used to provide additional information to investors that the bank may terminate its obligation to purchase tendered bonds if the long-term credit rating of the issuer was lowered to below an investment-grade level and/or the
issuer’s bonds were deemed taxable. Discontinued use in January 2001.
3. U.S. direct government securities: ‘G’ inactive qualifier
The letter ‘G’ followed the rating symbol when a fund’s portfolio
consisted primarily of direct U.S. government securities.
4. Public information ratings: ‘pi’ qualifier
This qualifier was used to indicate ratings that were based on an analysis of an issuer’s published financial information, as well as additional information in the public domain. Such ratings did not, however, reflect in-depth meetings with an
issuer’s management and therefore could have been based on less comprehensive information than ratings without a ‘pi’ suffix. Discontinued use as of December 2014 and as of August 2015 for Lloyd’s Syndicate Assessments.
5. Provisional ratings: ‘pr’ inactive qualifier
The letters ‘pr’ indicate that the rating was provisional. A provisional rating assumed the successful completion of a project financed by the debt being rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements was largely or entirely
dependent upon the successful, timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, made no comment on the likelihood of or the risk of default upon failure of such
completion.
6. Quantitative analysis of public information: ‘q’ inactive qualifier
A ‘q’ subscript indicates that the rating is based solely on quantitative analysis of publicly available information. Discontinued use in April 2001.
7. Extraordinary risks: ‘r’ inactive qualifier
The ‘r’ modifier was assigned to securities containing extraordinary risks, particularly market risks, that are not covered in the credit rating. The absence of an ‘r’ modifier should not be taken as an indication that an obligation would not
exhibit extraordinary noncredit-related risks. S&P discontinued the use of the ‘r’ modifier for most obligations in June 2000 and for the balance of obligations (mainly structured finance transactions) in November 2002.
Active Identifiers
1. Unsolicited: ‘unsolicited’ and ‘u’ identifier
The ‘u’ identifier and ‘unsolicited’ designation are assigned to credit ratings initiated by parties other than the issuer or its agents, including those initiated by S&P.
2. Structured finance: ‘sf’ identifier
The ‘sf’ identifier shall be assigned to ratings on "structured finance instruments" when required to comply with applicable law or regulatory requirement or when S&P believes it appropriate. The addition of the ‘sf’ identifier to a rating
does not change that rating’s definition or our opinion about the issue’s creditworthiness. For detailed information on the instruments assigned the ‘sf’ identifier, please see "S&P Announces Changes To The List of Instruments Carrying The
Structured Finance Identifier" in Section VIII, under "Related Research."
Local Currency and Foreign Currency Ratings
S &P’s issuer credit ratings make a distinction between foreign currency ratings and local currency ratings. An issuer’s foreign currency rating will differ from its local currency rating when the obligor has a different capacity to
meet its obligations denominated in its local currency, vs. obligations denominated in a foreign currency.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc’s (“Moody’s”) Credit Rating Definitions
Purpose
The system of rating securities was originated by John Moody in 1909. The purpose of Moody’s ratings is to provide investors with a simple system of gradation by which future relative creditworthiness of securities may be gauged.
Rating Symbols
Gradations of creditworthiness are indicated by rating symbols, with each symbol representing a group in which the credit characteristics are broadly the same. There are nine symbols as shown below, from that used to designate least credit risk
to that denoting greatest credit risk:
Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B Caa Ca C
Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa.
Absence of a Rating
Where no rating has been assigned or where a rating has been withdrawn, it may be for reasons unrelated to the creditworthiness of the issue.
Should no rating be assigned, the reason may be one of the following:
1. An application was not received or accepted.
2. The issue or issuer belongs to a group of securities or entities that are not rated as a matter of policy.
3. There is a lack of essential data pertaining to the issue or issuer.
4. The issue was privately placed, in which case the rating is not published in Moody’s publications.
Withdrawal may occur if new and material circumstances arise, the effects of which preclude satisfactory analysis; if there is no longer available reasonable up-to-date data to permit a judgment to be formed; if a bond is called for redemption;
or for other reasons.
Changes in Rating
The credit quality of most issuers and their obligations is not fixed and steady over a period of time, but tends to undergo change. For this reason changes in ratings occur so as to reflect variations in the intrinsic relative position of
issuers and their obligations.
A change in rating may thus occur at any time in the case of an individual issue. Such rating change should serve notice that Moody’s observes some alteration in creditworthiness, or that the previous rating did not fully reflect the quality of
the bond as now seen. While because of their very nature, changes are to be expected more frequently among bonds of lower ratings than among bonds of higher ratings. Nevertheless, the user of bond ratings should keep close and constant check on all
ratings — both high and low — to be able to note promptly any signs of change in status that may occur.
Limitations to Uses of Ratings*
Obligations carrying the same rating are not claimed to be of absolutely equal credit quality. In a broad sense, they are alike in position, but since there are a limited number of rating classes used in grading thousands of bonds, the symbols
cannot reflect the same shadings of risk which actually exist.
As ratings are designed exclusively for the purpose of grading obligations according to their credit quality, they should not be used alone as a basis for investment operations. For example, they have no value in forecasting the direction of
future trends of market price. Market price movements in bonds are influenced not only by the credit quality of individual issues but also by changes in money rates and general economic trends, as well as by the length of maturity, etc. During its
life even the highest rated bond may have wide price movements, while its high rating status remains unchanged.
The matter of market price has no bearing whatsoever on the determination of ratings, which are not to be construed as recommendations with respect to "attractiveness". The attractiveness of a given bond may depend on its yield, its maturity
date or other factors for which the investor may search, as well as on its credit quality, the only characteristic to which the rating refers.
Since ratings involve judgements about the future, on the one hand, and since they are used by investors as a means of protection, on the other, the effort is made when assigning ratings to look at "worst" possibilities in the "visible" future,
rather than solely at the past record and the status of the present. Therefore, investors using the rating should not expect to find in them a reflection of statistical factors alone, since they are an appraisal of long-term risks, including the
recognition of many non-statistical factors.
Though ratings may be used by the banking authorities to classify bonds in their bank examination procedure, Moody’s ratings are not made with these bank regulations in mind. Moody’s Investors Service’s own judgement as to the desirability or
non-desirability of a bond for bank investment purposes is not indicated by Moody’s ratings.
Moody’s ratings represent the opinion of Moody’s Investors Service as to the relative creditworthiness of securities. As such, they should be used in conjunction with the descriptions and statistics appearing in Moody’s publications. Reference
should be made to these statements for information regarding the issuer. Moody’s ratings are not commercial credit ratings. In no case is default or receivership to be imputed unless expressly stated.
*As set forth more fully on the copyright, credit ratings are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each rating
or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and
guarantor of, and each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, selling or holding.
Moody’s Short-Term Obligation Ratings
Ratings assigned on Moody’s global long-term and short-term rating scales are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations issues by non-financial corporates, financial institutions,
structured finance vehicles, project finance vehicles, and public sector entities. Long-term ratings are assigned to issuers or obligations with an original maturity of one year or more and reflect both on the likelihood of a default or
impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment . Short-term ratings are assigned to obligations with an original maturity of thirteen months or
less and reflect both on the likelihood of a default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default.
Moody’s employs the following designations to indicate the relative repayment ability of rated issuers:
P-1
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations.
P-2
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.
P-3
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.
NP
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
The global short-term Prime rating scale (the “Prime Scale”), immediately above, is used for commercial paper issued by U.S. Municipalities and nonprofits. These commercial paper programs may be backed by external
letters of credit or liquidity facilities, or by an issuer’s self-liquidity. For other short-term municipal obligations, Moody’s uses one of two other short-term rating scales, the Municipal Investment Grade (MIG) and Variable Municipal
Investment Grade (VMIG) scales discussed below.
The following table indicates the long-term ratings consistent with different short-term ratings when such long-term ratings exist.
SHORT-TERM VS. LONG-TERM RATINGS
Fitch’s National Credit Ratings
National scale ratings are an opinion of creditworthiness relative to the universe of issuers and issues within a single country. They are most commonly used in emerging market countries with sub- or low investment grade sovereign ratings on the
international scale.
As creditworthiness can be expressed across the full range of the scale, a national scale can enable greater rating differentiation within a market than the international scale, particularity in highly speculative grade countries where ratings
tend to cluster around the often low sovereign rating due to higher risks associated with a more volatile operating environment.
A "+" or "-" may be appended to a National Rating to denote relative status within a major rating category. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA(xxx)’ National Rating category, to categories below ‘CCC(xxx)’, or to Short-Term National Ratings
other than ‘F1(xxx)’.
National scale ratings are assigned on the basis that the “best credits or issuers” in the country are rated ‘AAA’ on the national scale. National Ratings are then assessed using the full range of the national scale based on a comparative
analysis of issuers rated under the same national scale to establish a relative ranking of credit worthiness.
At any given point in time, there is a certain relationship between National and International Ratings but there is not a precise translation between the scales. Fitch monitors the ratings relationship of issuers rated on both the international
and national scales to ensure the consistency of rating relativities across scales. In other words, if issuer “X” is rated higher than issuer “Y” on one scale, issuer “X” cannot be rated lower than issuer “Y” on the other scale.
National Ratings for local issuers exclude the effects of sovereign and transfer risk and exclude the possibility that investors may be unable to repatriate any due interest and principal repayments. Comparisons between different national scales
or between an individual national scale and the international rating scale are therefore inappropriate and potentially misleading.
In certain countries, regulators have established credit rating scales to be used within their domestic markets using specific nomenclature. In these countries, the agency’s National Rating definitions may be substituted by the regulatory
scales. For instance Fitch’s National Short Term Ratings of ‘F1+(xxx)’, ‘F1(xxx)’, ‘F2(xxx)’ and ‘F3(xxx)’ may be substituted by the regulatory scales, e.g. ‘A1+’, ‘A1’, ‘A2’ and ‘A3’. The below definitions thus serve as a template, but users
should consult the individual scales for each country listed on Fitch’s regional websites to determine if any additional or alternative category definitions apply.
Fitch maintains internal mapping tables that document the current relationship between the National and International Local Currency Ratings in each jurisdiction where we maintain a National Rating scale in order to serve as a tool for analysts.
Where our National rating coverage exceeds a minimum threshold and there is external demand, these mappings will be published on this site. Presently, publicly available mappings can be accessed here. Fitch currently publishes the mapping tables
for Brazil, South Africa and Chile.
Limitations of Fitch’s National Rating Scale
Specific limitations relevant to National Rating scale include:
•
|
National scale ratings are only available in selected countries.
|
•
|
National scale ratings are only directly comparable with other national ratings in the same country. There is a certain correlation between national and global ratings but there is not a precise translation between the scales. The
implied vulnerability to default of a given national scale rating will vary over time.
|
•
|
The value of default studies for National Ratings is limited. Due to the relative nature of national scales, a given national scale rating is not intended to represent a fixed amount of default risk over time. As a result, a default
study using only National Ratings may not give an accurate picture of the historical relationship between ratings and default risk. Users should exercise caution in making inferences relating to the relative vulnerability to default of
national scale ratings using the historical default experience with International Ratings and mapping tables to link the National and International ratings. As with ratings on any scale, the future will not necessarily follow the past.
|
Fitch’s National Short-Term Credit Ratings
F1(xxx)
Indicates the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. Under the agency’s National Rating scale, this rating is assigned to the lowest default risk relative to
others in the same country. Where the liquidity profile is particularly strong, a “+” is added to the assigned rating.
F2(xxx)
Indicates a good capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. However, the margin of safety is not as great as in the case of the higher ratings.
F3(xxx)
Indicates an adequate capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. However, such capacity is more susceptible to near-term adverse changes than for financial commitments in
higher rated categories.
B(xxx)
Indicates an uncertain capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. Such capacity is highly susceptible to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
C(xxx)
Indicates a highly uncertain capacity for timely payment of financial commitments relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country. Capacity for meeting financial commitments is solely reliant upon a sustained, favorable business and
economic environment.
RD(xxx): Restricted default
Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Applicable to entity ratings only.
D(xxx)
Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation .
Notes to Long-Term and Short-Term National Ratings:
The ISO international country code is placed in parentheses immediately following the rating letters to indicate the identity of the National market within which the rating applies. For illustrative purposes, (xxx)
has been used.
“+” or “-” may be appended to a National Rating to denote relative status within a major rating category. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA(xxx)’ Long-Term National Rating category, to categories below
‘CCC(xxx)’, or to Short-Term National Ratings other than ‘F1(xxx).’
LONG-TERM RATINGS
S&P Global Ratings Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings
Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on S&P analysis of the following considerations:
—
|
Likelihood of payment— the capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation;
|
—
|
Nature of and provisions of the obligation and the promise we impute ; and .
|
—
|
Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors’ rights.
|
An issue rating is an assessment of default risk, but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior
obligations, to reflect the lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company
obligations.)
S&P’s Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings
AAA
An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.
AA
An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.
A
An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet
its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.
BBB
An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation.
BB; B; CCC; CC; and C
Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will
likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.
BB
An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could
lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B
An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or
economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CCC
An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In
the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CC
An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred, but S&P expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the
anticipated time to default.
C
An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher.
D
An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless
S&P believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a
bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.
NR
This indicates that no rating has been requested, or that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that S&P does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.
Plus (+) or Minus (-)
The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
See active and inactive qualifiers following S&P Global Ratings Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings provided herein.
Moody’s Long-Term Obligation Ratings
Moody’s Long-Term Obligation Ratings
Ratings assigned on Moody’s global long-term and short-term rating scales are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations issues by non-financial corporates, financial institutions,
structured finance vehicles, project finance vehicles, and public sector entities. Long-term ratings are assigned to issuers or obligations with an original maturity of one year or more and reflect both on the likelihood of a default or
impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment . Short-term ratings are assigned to obligations with an original maturity of thirteen months or less and
reflect both on the likelihood of a default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment .
Moody’s Long-Term Rating Definitions:
Aaa
Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Aa
Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
A
Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Baa
Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
Ba
Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.
B
Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
Caa
Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca
Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C
Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aaa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the
higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.
Hybrid Indicator (hyb)
The hybrid indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance companies, and securities firms. By their terms, hybrid
securities allow for the omission of scheduled dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in impairment if such an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of
principal that could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator, the long-term obligation rating assigned to a hybrid security is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.
Fitch’s National Long-Term Credit Ratings
AAA(xxx)
‘AAA’ National Ratings denote the highest rating assigned by the agency in its National Rating scale for that country. This rating is assigned to issuers or obligations with the lowest expectation of default risk relative to all other issuers or
obligations in the same country or monetary union .
AA(xxx)
‘AA’ National Ratings denote expectations of very low default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union . The default risk inherent differs only slightly from that of the country’s highest rated
issuers or obligations.
A(xxx)
‘A’ National Ratings denote expectations of low default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union . However, changes in circumstances or economic conditions may affect the capacity for timely
repayment to a greater degree than is the case for financial commitments denoted by a higher rated category.
BBB(xxx)
‘BBB’ National Ratings denote a moderate default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union . However, changes in circumstances or economic conditions are more likely to affect the capacity for timely
repayment than is the case for financial commitments denoted by a higher rated category.
BB(xxx)
‘BB’ National Ratings denote an elevated default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union . Within the context of the country, payment is uncertain to some degree and capacity for timely repayment
remains more vulnerable to adverse economic change over time.
B(xxx)
‘B’ National Ratings denote a significantly elevated default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union . Financial commitments are currently being met but a limited margin of safety remains and
capacity for continued timely payments is contingent upon a sustained, favorable business and economic environment.
CCC(xxx) ‘CCC’ National Ratings denote very high default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union .
CC(xxx) ‘CC’ National Ratings denote default risk is among the highest relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union .
C(xxx) A default or default-like process has begun, or the issuer is in standstill, or for a closed funding vehicle, payment capacity is irrevocably impaired. Conditions that are indicative of a ‘C’
category rating for an issuer include:
a.
|
the issuer has entered into a grace or cure period following non-payment of a material financial obligation;
|
b.
|
the issuer has entered into a temporary negotiated waiver or standstill agreement following a payment default on a material financial obligation;
|
c.
|
the formal announcement by the issuer or their agent of a distressed debt exchange; and
|
d.
|
a closed financing vehicle where payment capacity is irrevocably impaired such that it is not expected to pay interest and/or principal in full during the life of the transaction, but where no payment default is imminent
|
RD(xxx): Restricted default.
“RD” ratings indicated that an issuer that in Fitch Ratings’ opinion has experienced an uncured payment default on a bond, loan or other material financial obligation but which has not entered into bankruptcy
filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure, and which has not otherwise ceased business. This would include:
a.
|
the selective payment default on a specific class or currency of debt;
|
b.
|
the uncured expiry of any applicable grace period, cure period or default forbearance period following a payment default on a bank loan, capital markets security or other material financial obligation;
|
c.
|
the extension of multiple waivers or forbearance periods upon a payment default on one or more material financial obligations either in series or in parallel; or
|
d.
|
execution of a distressed debt exchange on one or more material financial obligations.
|
D(xxx)
‘D’ National Ratings denote an issuer or instrument that is currently in default.
Notes to Long-Term and Short-Term National Ratings:
The ISO International country code is placed in parentheses immediately following the rating letters to indicate the identity of the National market within which the rating applies. For illustrative purposes, (xxx)
has been used.
“+” or “-” may be appended to a National Rating to denote relative status within a major rating category. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA(xxx)’ Long-Term National Rating category, to categories below
‘CCC(xxx)’, or to Short-Term National Ratings other than ‘F1(xxx).’
MUNICIPAL NOTE RATINGS
S&P Global Ratings Municipal Short-Term Note Ratings Definitions
An S&P U.S. municipal note rating reflects S &P’s opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating.
Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, S&P analysis will review the following considerations:
—
|
Amortization schedule—the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and
|
—
|
Source of payment—the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.
|
S&P’s municipal short-term note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1
Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation.
SP-2
Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.
SP-3
Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.
D
‘D’ is assigned upon failure to pay the note when due, completion of a distressed exchange offer, or the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example
due to automatic stay provisions.
See active and inactive qualifiers following S&P Global Ratings Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings provided herein.
Moody’s US Municipal Short-Term Debt And Demand Obligation Ratings
Moody’s Short-Term Obligation Ratings
While the global short-term ‘prime’ rating scale is applied to US municipal tax-exempt commercial paper, these programs are typically backed by external letters of credit or liquidity facilities and their short-term
prime ratings usually map to the long-term rating of the enhancing bank or financial institution and not to the municipality’s rating. Other short-term municipal obligations, which generally have different funding sources for repayment, are rated
using two additional short-term rating scales (i.e., the MIG and VMIG scales discussed below).
The Municipal Investment Grade (MIG) scale is used to rate US municipal cash flow notes , bond anticipation notes and certain other short-term obligations, which typically mature in three years or
less. Under certain circumstances, Moody’s uses the MIG scale for bond anticipation notes with maturities up to five years. Municipal notes rated on the MIG scale may be secured by either pledged revenues or proceeds of a take-out financing
received prior to note maturity. MIG ratings expire at the maturity of the obligation, and the issuer’s long-term rating is only one consideration in assigning the MIG rating. MIG ratings are divided into three levels—MIG 1 through MIG 3—while
speculative grade short-term obligations are designated SG.
MIG 1
This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG 2
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.
MIG 3
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.
SG
This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.
Moody’s Demand Obligation Ratings
In the case of variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs), a two-component rating is assigned: a long or short-term debt rating and a demand obligation rating. The first element represents Moody’s evaluation of risk
associated with scheduled principal and interest payments. The second element represents Moody’s evaluation of risk associated with the ability to receive purchase price upon demand (“demand feature”). The second element uses a rating from a
variation of the MIG scale called the Variable Municipal Investment Grade (VMIG) scale. VMIG ratings of demand obligations with unconditional liquidity support are mapped from the short-term debt rating (or counterparty assessment) of the support
provider, or the underlying obligor in the absence of third party liquidity support, with VMIG 1 corresponding to P-1, VMIG 2 to P-2, VMIG 3 to P-3 and SG to not prime. For example, the VMIG rating for an industrial revenue bond with Company XYZ as
the underlying obligor would normally have the same numerical modifier as Company XYZ’s prime rating. Transitions of VMIG ratings of demand obligations with conditional liquidity support, as shown in the diagram below, differ from transitions on
the Prime scale to reflect the risk that external liquidity support will terminate if the issuer’s long-term rating drops below investment grade.
The VMIG short-term demand obligation rating is typically assigned if the frequency of the demand feature is less than every three years. If the frequency of the demand feature is less than three years but the
purchase price is payable only with remarketing proceeds, the short-term demand obligation rating is “NR.”
VMIG 1
This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely
payment of purchase price upon demand.
VMIG 2
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of
purchase price upon demand.
VMIG 3
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the
timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
SG
This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have an investment grade short-term rating or may lack the
structural and/or legal protections necessary to ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
US MUNICIPAL SHORT-TERM VS. LONG-TERM RATINGS
|
|
|
|
* For VRDBs supported with conditional liquidity support, short-term ratings transition down at higher long-term ratings to reflect the risk of termination of liquidity support as a result of a downgrade
below investment grade.
VMIG ratings of VRDBs with unconditional liquidity support reflect the short-term debt rating (or counterparty assessment) of the liquidity support provider with VMIG 1 corresponding to P-1, VMIG 2 to P-2, VMIG 3 to P-3 and SG to not
prime.
|