UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 (Mark One)
ý   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
 
OR
 
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                     to
 
Commission File Number                     001-11595
 
Astec Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Tennessee
62-0873631
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
 
 
1725 Shepherd Road, Chattanooga, Tennessee
37421
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
(423) 899-5898
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ý 
NO o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES ý 
NO o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large Accelerated Filer ý
Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated filer o   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company o
   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
YES
NO ý
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class
Outstanding at April 18, 2011
Common Stock, par value $0.20
22,657,050

 
1

 


 
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
  INDEX
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 





 
2

 

PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

Astec Industries, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
 
   
March 31, 2011
(unaudited)
   
December 31,
2010
 
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
  Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 80,171     $ 94,597  
  Trade receivables, net
    97,985       77,978  
  Other receivables
    2,236       2,885  
  Inventories
    272,663       252,981  
  Prepaid expenses and other
    7,212       9,041  
  Deferred income tax assets
    13,961       10,339  
    Total current assets
    474,228       447,821  
Property and equipment, net
    167,567       168,242  
Investments
    12,506       11,672  
Goodwill
    13,907       13,907  
Other long-term assets
    8,612       7,997  
    Total assets
  $ 676,820     $ 649,639  
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
  Accounts payable
  $ 52,124     $ 44,493  
  Income tax payable
    5,036       406  
  Accrued product warranty
    9,979       9,891  
  Customer deposits
    36,588       35,602  
  Accrued payroll and related liabilities
    14,254       16,121  
  Accrued loss reserves
    4,453       3,796  
  Other accrued liabilities
    22,374       20,117  
    Total current liabilities
    144,808       130,426  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    16,639       12,653  
Other long-term liabilities
    13,348       13,754  
    Total liabilities
    174,795       156,833  
Shareholders’ equity
    501,432       492,208  
Non-controlling interest
    593       598  
    Total equity
    502,025       492,806  
    Total liabilities and equity
  $ 676,820     $ 649,639  

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 
3

 



Astec Industries, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
(unaudited)

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Net sales
  $ 230,189     $ 193,454  
Cost of sales
    175,485       147,313  
Gross profit
    54,704       46,141  
Selling, general, administrative and  engineering expenses
    39,489       32,718  
Income from operations
    15,215       13,423  
Interest expense
    36       123  
Other income, net of expenses
    406       488  
Income before income taxes
    15,585       13,788  
Income taxes
    5,427       4,956  
Net income
    10,158       8,832  
Net income attributable to  non-controlling interest
    14       38  
Net income attributable to controlling interest
  $ 10,144     $ 8,794  
                 
Earnings per common share
               
Net income attributable to controlling interest:
               
    Basic
  $ 0.45     $ 0.39  
    Diluted
  $ 0.44     $ 0.39  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
               
    Basic
    22,566,105       22,473,599  
    Diluted
    22,919,430       22,767,460  

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


 
4

 


Astec Industries, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income
  $ 10,158     $ 8,832  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
  by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    4,642       4,866  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    335       51  
Provision for inventory reserve
    1,610       1,301  
Provision for warranty
    2,901       2,859  
Deferred compensation provision
    479       192  
Sale of trading securities, net
    14       530  
Stock-based compensation
    923       633  
Tax benefit from stock incentive plans
    (9 )     (49 )
Deferred income tax provision
    (1,382 )     (1,925 )
(Gain) loss on disposition of fixed assets
    40       (1
(Increase) decrease in:
               
Trade and other receivables
    (20,053 )     (15,116 )
Inventories
    (21,292 )     815  
Prepaid expenses
    1,581       6,316  
Other assets
    (976 )     (17 )
Increase (decrease) in:
               
Accounts payable
    7,631       5,783  
Accrued product warranty
    (2,813 )     (3,024 )
Customer deposits
    986       (3,572 )
Income taxes payable
    4,638       1,150  
Other accrued liabilities
    212       5  
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
    (10,375 )     9,629  
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Expenditures for property and equipment
    (3,964 )     (1,751 )
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
    49       20  
Net cash used by investing activities
    (3,915 )     (1,731 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Tax benefit from stock option exercise
    9       49  
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan transactions, net
    (56 )     (52 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    20       272  
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
    (27 )     269  
Effect of exchange rates on cash
    (109 )     588  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (14,426     8,755  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    94,597       40,429  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 80,171     $ 49,184  

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 
5

 


Astec Industries, Inc.
 
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
 
(in thousands, except shares)
 
(unaudited)
 
                                                 
                                                 
   
Common
Stock
 Shares
   
Common
Stock
 Amount
   
Additional
Paid-in-
 Capital
   
Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
 Income
   
Company
Shares
Held
 by SERP
   
Retained
Earnings
   
Non-
controlling Interest
   
Total
 Equity
 
Balance, December 31,
  2010
    22,646,822     $ 4,529     $ 128,831     $ 8,046     $ (2,217 )   $ 353,019     $ 598     $ 492,806  
Net income
                                            10,144       14       10,158  
Other comprehensive
  income:
                                                               
  Foreign currency
    translation  adjustments,
    net of tax
                            (1,770 )                     (19 )     (1,789 )
  Change in  unrecognized
    pension and post
    retirement costs,
    net of tax
                            (46 )                             (46 )
  Comprehensive  income
                                                    (5 )     8,323  
Stock-based  compensation
    4,908       1       922                                       923  
Stock issued under  incentive
    plans
    1,300       1       28                                       29  
SERP transactions,  net
                                    (56 )                     (56 )
Balance, March  31, 2011
    22,653,030     $ 4,531     $ 129,781     $ 6,230     $ (2,273 )   $ 363,163     $ 593     $ 502,025  

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements




 
6

 

ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC .
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Note 1.  Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.  It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Astec Industries, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“ FASB”) issued guidance that supersedes certain previous rules relating to how a company allocates consideration to all of its deliverables in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement.  The revised guidance eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation in which the undelivered element is measured at its estimated selling price and the delivered element is measured as the residual of the arrangement consideration and alternatively requires that the relative-selling-price method be used in all circumstances in which an entity recognizes revenue for an arrangement with multiple-deliverables.  The revised guidance requires both ongoing disclosures regarding an entity’s multiple-element revenue arrangements as well as certain transitional disclosures during periods after adoption.  All entities must adopt the revised guidance no later than the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010 with earlier adoption allowed.  Entities may elect to adopt the guidance through either prospective application or through retrospective application to all revenue arrangements for all periods presented.  The Company adopted the revised guidance using the prospective application method effective January 1, 2011.  The Company’s sales contracts typically contain provisions pricing each separate component, including separate equipment components, installation services and freight, on which multiple element accounting may be applied; therefore the adoption of this guidance has not had a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 2.  Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income attributable to controlling interest by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted earnings per share include the potential dilutive effects of options, restricted stock units and shares held in the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.

 
7

 


The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

   
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Numerator:
           
Net income attributable to controlling interest
  $ 10,144,000     $ 8,794,000  
Denominator:
               
Denominator for basic earnings per share
    22,566,105       22,473,599  
Effect of dilutive securities:
               
Employee stock options and restricted stock units
    254,949       196,733  
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
    98,376       97,128  
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
    22,919,430       22,767,460  
                 
Net income attributable to controlling  interest per share:
               
Basic
  $ 0.45     $ 0.39  
Diluted
  $ 0.44     $ 0.39  

A total of 1,072 and 1,801 options were antidilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Antidilutive options are not included in the diluted earnings per share computation.

Note 3.  Receivables
Receivables are net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,925,000 and $1,820,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Note 4.  Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

   
March 31,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Raw materials and parts
  $ 108,424     $ 96,731  
Work-in-process
    69,085       60,463  
Finished goods
    74,674       77,583  
Used equipment
    20,480       18,204  
   Total
  $ 272,663     $ 252,981  

The above inventory amounts are net of reserves totalling $20,232,000 and $19,399,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Note 5.  Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $174,182,000 and $169,955,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Note 6.  Fair Value Measurements
The Company has various financial instruments that must be measured at fair value on a recurring basis including marketable debt and equity securities held by Astec Insurance Company (“Astec Insurance”), the Company’s captive insurance company, and marketable equity securities held in an unqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”).  The financial assets held in the SERP also constitute a liability of the Company for financial reporting purposes.  The Company’s subsidiaries also occasionally enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

 
8

 


For cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, other receivables, revolving debt and accounts payable, the carrying amount approximates the fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.  Investments are carried at their fair value based on quoted market prices for identical or similar assets or, where no quoted prices exist, other observable inputs for the asset.  The fair values of foreign currency exchange contracts are based on quotations from various banks for similar instruments using models with market based inputs.

Financial assets and liabilities are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.  The inputs used to measure the fair value are identified in the following hierarchy:

Level 1 -
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2 -
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
 
Level 3 -
Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

As indicated in the table below (which excludes the Company’s pension assets), the Company has determined that all its financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2011 are level 1 and level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as defined above (in thousands):

   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Financial Assets:
                       
Trading equity securities:
                       
SERP money market fund
  $ 988     $ -     $ -     $ 988  
SERP mutual funds
    1,782       -       -       1,782  
Preferred stocks
    515       -       -       515  
Trading debt securities:
                               
Corporate bonds
    -       5,769       -       5,769  
Municipal bonds
    -       3,343       -       3,343  
Floating rate notes
    -       225       -       225  
U.S. Treasury bill
    249       -       -       249  
Other government bonds
    -       78       -       78  
    Total financial assets
  $ 3,534     $ 9,415     $ -     $ 12,949  
                                 
Financial Liabilities:
                               
SERP liabilities
  $ 6,438     $ -     $ -     $ 6,438  
Derivative financial instruments
    -       1,240       -       1,240  
    Total financial liabilities
  $ 6,438     $ 1,240     $ -     $ 7,678  

The Company’s investments (other than pension assets) consist of the following (in thousands):
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   
Estimated Fair
Value (Net
Carrying Amount)
 
March 31, 2011:
                       
  Trading equity securities
  $ 3,203     $ 82     $ -     $ 3,285  
  Trading debt securities
    9,405       320       61       9,664  
    $ 12,608     $ 402     $ 61     $ 12,949  
                                 
December 31, 2010:
                               
  Trading equity securities
  $ 3,089     $ 154     $ 7     $ 3,236  
  Trading debt securities
    9,393       266       67       9,592  
    $ 12,482     $ 420     $ 74     $ 12,828  


 
9

 


The trading equity investments noted above are valued at their estimated fair value based on their quoted market prices and the debt securities are valued based upon a mix of observable market prices and model driven prices derived from a matrix of observable market prices for assets with similar characteristics obtained from a nationally recognized third party pricing service.  Additionally, a significant portion of the trading equity securities are in equity money market and mutual funds and also comprise a portion of the Company’s liability under its SERP.

Trading debt securities are comprised of marketable debt securities held by Astec Insurance. Astec Insurance has an investment strategy that focuses on providing regular and predictable interest income from a diversified portfolio of high-quality fixed income securities. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $443,000 and $1,156,000, respectively, of trading debt securities were due to mature within twelve months and, accordingly, are included in other current assets.  The financial liabilities related to the SERP shown above are included in other long-term liabilities and the derivative financial liabilities are included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets.

Net unrealized gains or losses incurred during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 on investments still held as of the end of each reporting period amounted to gains of $600,000 and $86,000, respectively.

Note 7.  Debt
During April 2007, the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), whereby Wachovia has extended to the Company an unsecured line of credit of up to $100,000,000, including a sub-limit for letters of credit of up to $15,000,000.  Wachovia has subsequently been acquired by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), and therefore the credit agreement is now with Wells Fargo.

The Wells Fargo credit facility had an original term of three years with two one-year extensions available.  Early in 2010, the Company exercised the final extension bringing the new loan maturity date to May 2012.  The interest rate for borrowings is a function of the Adjusted LIBOR Rate or Adjusted LIBOR Market Index Rate, as elected by the Company, plus a margin based upon a leverage ratio pricing grid ranging between 0.5% and 1.5%.  As of March 31, 2011 the applicable margin based upon the leverage ratio pricing grid was equal to 0.5%.  The unused facility fee is 0.125%.  The Wells Fargo credit facility requires no principal amortization and interest only payments are due, in the case of loans bearing interest at the Adjusted LIBOR Market Index Rate, monthly in arrears and, in the case of loans bearing interest at the Adjusted LIBOR Rate, at the end of the applicable interest period therefore.  The Wells Fargo credit agreement contains certain financial covenants related to minimum fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth and maximum allowed capital expenditures.  At March 31, 2011, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility but did have letters of credit totaling $7,608,000 outstanding, resulting in borrowing availability of $92,392,000 on the Wells Fargo credit facility.  The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under its credit facility as of March 31, 2011.

The Company's South African subsidiary, Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd. (“Osborn”), has available a credit facility of $8,833,000 (ZAR 60,000,000) to finance short-term working capital needs, as well as to cover performance letters of credit, advance payment and retention guarantees. As of March 31, 2011, Osborn had no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, but $3,760,000 in performance letters of credit, advance payment and retention guarantees were issued under the facility.  The facility is secured by Osborn's buildings and improvements, accounts receivable, cash balances and a $2,000,000 letter of credit issued by the parent Company.  As of March 31, 2011, Osborn had available credit under the facility of $5,073,000.  The facility has an ongoing, indefinite term subject to annual reviews by the bank.  The interest rate is the South African prime rate.  The agreement has an unused facility fee of 0.793%.

The Company’s Australian subsidiary, Astec Australia Pty Ltd (“Astec Australia”) has an available credit facility to finance short-term working capital needs of $827,000 (AUD 800,000), and banking arrangements to finance foreign exchange dealer limit orders of up to $1,705,000 (AUD 1,650,000) secured by cash balances in the amount of $1,033,000 (AUD 1,000,000) and a $1,000,000 letter of credit issued by the parent Company.  No amounts were outstanding under the credit facility at March 31, 2011.  The interest rate is the Australian adjusted Bank Business Rate plus a margin of 1.05%.

 
10

 


Note 8.  Product Warranty Reserves
The Company warrants its products against manufacturing defects and performance to specified standards. The warranty period and performance standards vary by market and uses of its products, but generally range from three months to one year or up to a specified number of hours of operations. The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranties and records a liability at the time product sales are recorded.  The product warranty liability is primarily based on historical claim rates, nature of claims and the associated cost.

Changes in the Company's product warranty liability for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):


   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Reserve balance, beginning of the period
  $ 9,891     $ 8,714  
Warranty liabilities accrued
    2,901       2,859  
Warranty liabilities settled
    (2,804 )     (3,043 )
Other
    (9 )     19  
Reserve balance, end of the period
  $ 9,979     $ 8,549  

Note 9.  Accrued Loss Reserves
The Company accrues reserves for losses related to known workers' compensation and general liability claims that have been incurred but not yet paid or are estimated to have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company.  The undiscounted reserves are actuarially determined based on the Company's evaluation of the type and severity of individual claims and historical information, primarily its own claims experience, along with assumptions about future events.  Changes in assumptions, as well as changes in actual experience, could cause these estimates to change in the future.  Total accrued loss reserves were $7,766,000 at March 31, 2011 compared to $8,044,000 at December 31, 2010, of which $3,313,000 and $4,248,000 were included in other long-term liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Note 10.  Income Taxes
The Company’s combined effective income tax rate was 34.8% and 35.9% for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 includes the effect of state income taxes and other discrete benefits consisting primarily of tax credits for research and development activities and the domestic production activities deduction.  The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 did not contain a benefit for research and development tax credits as the legislation providing the credits was not enacted by Congress until later in 2010.

The Company's liability recorded for uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2011 has not changed significantly in amount or composition since December 31, 2010.  

Note 11.  Segment Information
The Company has four reportable segments. These segments are combinations of business units that offer similar products and services. A brief description of each segment is as follows:

Asphalt Group - This segment consists of three business units that design, engineer, manufacture and market a complete line of portable, stationary and relocatable hot-mix asphalt plants and related components and a variety of heaters, heat transfer processing equipment, thermal fluid storage tanks and concrete plants. The principal purchasers of these products are asphalt producers, highway and heavy equipment contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies.

Aggregate and Mining Group - This segment consists of six business units that design, engineer, manufacture and market a complete line of rock crushers, feeders, conveyors, screens and washing equipment. The principal purchasers of these products are open-mine and quarry operators.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group - This segment consists of two business units that design, engineer, manufacture and market asphalt pavers, asphalt material transfer vehicles, milling machines and paver screeds. The principal purchasers of these products are highway and heavy equipment contractors and foreign and domestic governmental agencies.

 
11

 

Underground Group - This segment consists of two business units that design, engineer, manufacture and market auger boring machines, directional drills, fluid/mud systems, chain and wheel trenching equipment, rock saws, road miners, geothermal drills and oil and natural gas drills. The principal purchasers of these products are pipeline and utility contractors and oil and natural gas drillers.

All Others - This category consists of the Company’s other business units, including Peterson Pacific Corp. (“Peterson”), Astec Australia Pty Ltd (“Astec Australia”), Astec Insurance Company and the parent company, Astec Industries, Inc., that do not meet the requirements for separate disclosure as an operating segment.   Peterson designs, manufactures and markets whole-tree pulpwood chippers, horizontal grinders and blower trucks.  Astec Australia markets equipment and installs, services and provides parts support for many of the products produced by the Company’s manufacturing companies.

Segment Information:

   
(in thousands)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31, 2011
 
   
Asphalt
Group
   
Aggregate
and Mining
Group
   
Mobile Asphalt
Paving
Group
   
Underground
Group
   
All
Others
   
Total
 
Net sales to external  customers
  $ 73,754     $ 78,853     $ 49,955     $ 11,667     $ 15,960     $ 230,189  
Intersegment sales
    4,458       7,164       3,777       1,419       -       16,818  
Gross profit
    19,228       18,749       13,440       123       3,164       54,704  
Gross profit percent
    26.1 %     23.8 %     26.9 %     1.1 %     19.8 %     23.8 %
Segment profit (loss)
  $ 10,820     $ 5,622     $ 7,312     $ (3,849 )   $ (8,500 )   $ 11,405  


   
(in thousands)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31, 2010
 
   
Asphalt
Group
   
Aggregate
and Mining
Group
   
Mobile Asphalt
Paving
Group
   
Underground
Group
   
All
Others
   
Total
 
Net sales to external  customers
  $ 70,061     $ 58,919     $ 42,082     $ 8,927     $ 13,465     $ 193,454  
Intersegment sales
    6,554       7,594       4,141       932       -       19,221  
Gross profit (loss)
    20,207       13,187       10,510       (357 )     2,594       46,141  
Gross profit percent
    28.8 %     22.4 %     25.0 %     (4.0 %)     19.3 %     23.9 %
Segment profit (loss)
  $ 12,795     $ 2,822     $ 5,210     $ (3,542 )   $ (7,510 )   $ 9,775  

A reconciliation of total segment profits to the Company's consolidated totals is as follows (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Total segment profits
  $ 11,405     $ 9,775  
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiary
    (14 )     (38 )
Elimination of intersegment profit
    (1,247 )     (943 )
Net income attributable to controlling interest
  $ 10,144     $ 8,794  


 
12

 


Note 12.  Contingent Matters
Certain customers have financed purchases of Company products through arrangements in which the Company is contingently liable for customer debt of $3,173,000 and $3,037,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  At March 31, 2011, the maximum potential amount of future payments for which the Company would be liable is equal to $3,173,000.  These arrangements also provide that the Company will receive the lender’s full security interest in the equipment financed if the Company is required to fulfill its contingent liability under these arrangements.  The Company has recorded a liability of $330,000 related to these guarantees at March 31, 2011.

In addition, the Company is contingently liable under letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo totaling $7,608,000 as of March 31, 2011, including a $1,000,000 and a $2,000,000 letter of credit issued on behalf of Astec Australia and Osborn, respectively, two of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.  The outstanding letters of credit expire at various dates through April 2012.  As of March 31, 2011, Osborn is contingently liable for a total of $3,760,000 in performance letters of credit, advance payments and retention guarantees.  As of March 31, 2011, the maximum potential amount of future payments under these letters of credit and guarantees for which the Company could be liable is $11,368,000.

Pursuant to a purchase agreement executed in late 2010, the Company is committed to purchase real estate facilities in Australia for a total of $4,960,000 (AUD 4,800,000), of which $496,000 (AUD 480,000) was paid as a deposit prior to December 31, 2010. Final closing on the acquisition is expected in the second quarter of 2011, after which time the property will be used as the primary facilities of Astec Australia in place of their currently leased property.

The Company is currently a party to various claims and legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of business.  If management believes that a loss arising from such claims and legal proceedings is probable and can reasonably be estimated, the Company records the amount of the loss (excluding estimated legal fees), or the minimum estimated liability when the loss is estimated using a range, and no point within the range is more probable than another.  As management becomes aware of additional information concerning such contingencies, any potential liability related to these matters is assessed and the estimates are revised, if necessary.  If management believes that a loss arising from such claims and legal proceedings is either (i) probable but cannot be reasonably estimated or (ii) reasonably possible but not probable, the Company does not record the amount of the loss, but does make specific disclosure of such matter.  Based upon currently available information and with the advice of counsel, management believes that the ultimate outcome of its current claims and legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.  However, claims and legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and rulings unfavorable to the Company could occur.  If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

During 2009, the Company received notice that Johnson Crushers International, Inc. is subject to an enforcement action brought by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality related to an alleged failure to comply with federal and state air permitting regulations. Each agency is expected to seek sanctions that will include monetary penalties. No penalty has yet been proposed. The Company believes that it has cured the alleged violations and is cooperating fully with the regulatory agencies. At this stage of the investigations, the Company is unable to predict the outcome or the amount of any such sanctions.

During 2004, the Company received notice from the EPA that it may be responsible for a portion of the costs incurred in connection with an environmental cleanup in Illinois. The discharge of hazardous materials and associated cleanup relate to activities occurring prior to the Company’s acquisition of Barber-Greene in 1986. The Company believes that over 300 other parties have received similar notices. At this time, the Company cannot predict whether the EPA will seek to hold the Company liable for a portion of the cleanup costs or the amount of any such liability.

The Company has not recorded a liability with respect to either environmental matter because no estimates of the amount of any such liabilities can be made at this time.

 
13

 


Note 13.  Shareholders’ Equity
Under terms of the Company’s stock option plans, officers and certain other employees were granted options to purchase the Company’s common stock at no less than 100% of the market price on the date the option was granted.  No additional options can be granted under these plans; however the Company has reserved unissued shares of common stock for the exercise of the 91,323 unexercised and outstanding options as of March 31, 2011 under these employee plans.  All options granted under these plans vested prior to 2007.

In addition, a Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan has been established to allow non-employee directors to have a personal financial stake in the Company through an ownership interest.  Directors may elect to receive their compensation in cash, common stock, deferred stock or stock options.  Options granted under the Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan vest and become fully exercisable immediately.  All stock options have a 10-year term.  The shares reserved under the 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan total 140,063 as of March 31, 2011, of which 132,210 shares are available for future grants of stock or deferred stock to directors.  No additional options can be granted under this plan.  The fair value of stock awards granted to non-employee directors totaled $58,000 and $42,000 during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In 2006, the Company adopted a five-year plan to award key members of management restricted stock units (“RSU’s”) each year under the Company’s 2006 Incentive Plan.  The plan allowed the Company to grant up to 700,000 RSU’s to employees based upon the annual performance of individual subsidiaries and  the Company as a whole during each of the five years ended December 31, 2010.  Additional RSU’s were granted in 2011 based upon cumulative five-year performance.  Generally, each award will vest at the end of five years from its date of grant, or at the time a recipient retires after reaching age 65, if earlier.  In early 2011, a subsequent plan was formulated under the Company’s 2011 Incentive Plan which was approved by the Company’s shareholders in their annual meeting held in April 2011.  This plan also allows the Company to grant up to 700,000 RSU’s to employees and will operate in a similar fashion to the 2006 Incentive Plan for each of the five years ending December 31, 2015.  Compensation expense of $865,000 and $591,000 has been recorded in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, to reflect the fair value of the total shares granted or expected to be granted under both plans, amortized over the portion of the vesting period occurring during the periods.  The fair value of the RSU’s that vested in the three-month period ending March 31, 2011 was $115,000.

Note 14.  Seasonality
Based upon historical results of the past several years, 25% to 28% of the Company's annual revenues typically occur during the first three months of the year.

Note 15.  Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Net income
  $ 10,158     $ 8,832  
Change in unrecognized pension and post retirement benefit costs,  net of tax
    (46 )     (61 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
    (1,789 )     772  
Comprehensive income
    8,323       9,543  
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest
    5       (44 )
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest
  $ 8,328     $ 9,499  


 
14

 


Note 16.  Other Income, net of expenses
Other income, net of expenses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Interest income
  $ 230     $ 234  
Gain on investments
    60       92  
Other
    116       162  
  Total
  $ 406     $ 488  

Note 17.  Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks related to its ongoing business operations.  The primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is foreign currency risk.  From time to time the Company’s foreign subsidiaries enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.  The fair value of the derivative financial instrument is recorded on the Company’s balance sheet and is adjusted to fair value at each measurement date.  The changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the current period.  The Company does not engage in speculative transactions nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.  The average U.S. dollar equivalent notional amount of outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts was $14,286,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The Company reported $1,240,000 of derivative liabilities in other accrued liabilities at March 31, 2011.  The Company reported $1,221,000 of derivative liabilities in other accrued liabilities and $30,000 in other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2010.  The Company recognized, as a component of cost of sales, a net loss of $530,000 and a net gain of $14,000 on derivative financial instruments in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  There were no derivatives that were designated as hedges at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.


 
15

 

 
 
Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Statements contained anywhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not limited to historical information are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are sometimes identified by the words “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “forecasts” and “expects” and similar expressions.  Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the Company's expected sales and results of operations during 2011, the Company's expected capital expenditures in 2011, the expected benefit and impact of financing arrangements, the ability of the Company to meet its working capital and capital expenditure requirements through March 31, 2012, the impact of the enactment of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act of 2010 or any future state or federal funding for transportation construction programs, the need for road improvements, the impact of other public sector spending and funding mechanisms, changes in the economic environment as it affects the Company, the timing and impact of changes in the economy, the market confidence of customers and dealers, the Company being called upon to fulfill certain contingencies, the expected dates of granting of restricted stock units, changes in interest rates and the impact of such changes on the financial results of the Company, changes in the prices of steel and oil, the ability of the Company to offset future changes in prices in raw materials, the change in the level of the Company's presence and sales in international markets, the seasonality of the Company’s business, the percentage of the Company’s equipment sold directly to end users, the amount or value of unrecognized tax benefits, the Company’s discussion of its critical accounting policies and the ultimate outcome of the Company's current claims and legal proceedings.

These forward-looking statements are based largely on management's expectations, which are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in this Report and in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which may cause actual results, financial or otherwise, to be materially different from those anticipated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

The risks and uncertainties identified herein under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of this Report, elsewhere herein and in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, should be carefully considered when evaluating the Company's business and future prospects.

Overview
Astec Industries, Inc., (“the Company”) is a leading manufacturer and marketer of equipment for road building, aggregate processing, directional drilling, trenching and wood processing. The Company’s businesses:

•           design, engineer, manufacture and market equipment that is used in each phase of road building, including quarrying and crushing the aggregate to producing asphalt or concrete, recycling old asphalt or concrete and applying the asphalt;

•           design, engineer, manufacture and market additional equipment and components including trenching, auger boring, directional drilling, geothermal drilling, oil and natural gas drilling, industrial heat transfer, wood chipping and grinding; and

•           manufacture and sell replacement parts for equipment in each of its product lines.

 
16

 


The Company has 14 manufacturing companies, 13 of which fall within four reportable operating segments, which include the Asphalt Group, the Aggregate and Mining Group, the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group and the Underground Group. The business units in the Asphalt Group design, manufacture and market a complete line of asphalt plants and related components, heating and heat transfer processing equipment and storage tanks for the asphalt paving and other unrelated industries including energy production and concrete mixing plants. The business units in the Aggregate and Mining Group design, manufacture and market equipment for the aggregate, metallic mining and recycling industries. The business units in the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group design, manufacture and market asphalt pavers, material transfer vehicles, milling machines, stabilizers and screeds. The business units in the Underground Group design, manufacture and market a complete line of trenching equipment, directional drills, geothermal drills and auger boring machines for the underground construction market, as well as vertical drills for gas and oil field development. The Company also has one other category that contains the business units that do not meet the requirements for separate disclosure as an operating segment. The business units in the Other category include Peterson Pacific Corp. (“Peterson”), Astec Australia Pty Ltd (“Astec Australia”), Astec Insurance Company (“Astec Insurance” or “the captive”) and Astec Industries, Inc., the parent company. Peterson designs, manufactures and markets whole-tree pulpwood chippers, horizontal grinders and blower trucks. Astec Australia markets and installs equipment, and services and provides parts for many of the products produced by the Company’s manufacturing companies.  Astec Insurance is a captive insurance company.

The Company’s financial performance is affected by a number of factors, including the cyclical nature and varying conditions of the markets it serves. Demand in these markets fluctuates in response to overall economic conditions and is particularly sensitive to the amount of public sector spending on infrastructure development, privately funded infrastructure development, changes in the price of crude oil, which affects the cost of fuel and liquid asphalt, and changes in the price of steel.

In August 2005, President Bush signed into law the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (“SAFETEA-LU”), which authorized appropriation of $286.5 billion in guaranteed federal funding for road, highway and bridge construction, repair and improvement of the federal highways and other transit projects for federal fiscal years October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2009. The Company believes that federal highway funding such as SAFETEA-LU influences the purchasing decisions of the Company’s customers who are more comfortable making purchasing decisions with such legislation in place. Federal funding provides for approximately 25% of all highway, street, roadway and parking construction in the United States.

SAFETEA-LU funding expired on September 30, 2009 and federal transportation funding operated on short-term appropriations through March 17, 2010. On March 18, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act. This law extended authorization of the surface transportation programs previously funded under SAFETEA-LU through December 31, 2010 at 2009 levels. In addition, the HIRE Act authorized a one-time transfer of $19.5 billion from the general fund to the highway trust fund related to previously foregone interest payments. It also shifted the cost of fuel tax exemptions for state and local governments from the highway trust fund to the general fund, which is estimated to generate an anticipated $1.5 billion annually, and allows the highway trust fund to retain interest earned on future unexpended balances. Although the HIRE Act helped stabilize the federal highway program, the Company believes a new multi-year highway program at increased funding levels would have the greatest positive impact on the road construction industry and allow its customers to plan and execute longer-term projects. The current resolution funding federal transportation expenditures expires on September 30, 2011 and funds federal highway spending for fiscal year 2011 at the 2010 level of $41.1 billion. The level of future federal highway construction is uncertain, and any future funding may be at lower levels than in the past.

Several other countries have implemented infrastructure spending programs to stimulate their economies. The Company believes these spending programs have had a positive impact on its financial performance; however, the magnitude of that impact cannot be determined.

The public sector spending described above is needed to fund road, bridge and mass transit improvements. The Company believes that increased funding is unquestionably needed to restore the nation’s highways to a quality level required for safety, fuel efficiency and mitigation of congestion. In the Company’s opinion, amounts needed for such improvements are significantly greater than amounts approved to date, and funding mechanisms such as the federal usage fee per gallon of gasoline, which has not been increased in nearly 20 years, would likely need to be increased along with other measures to generate the funds needed.

 
17

 


In addition to public sector funding, the economies in the markets the Company serves, the price of oil and its impact on customers’ purchasing decisions and the price of steel may each affect the Company’s financial performance. Economic downturns generally result in decreased purchasing by the Company’s customers, which, in turn, causes reductions in sales and increased pricing pressure on the Company’s products. Rising interest rates also typically negatively impact customers’ attitudes toward purchasing equipment. The Federal Reserve has maintained historically low interest rates in response to the recent economic downturn; however, the Company expects interest rates to begin to increase during 2011.

Significant portions of the Company’s revenues relate to the sale of equipment involved in the production, handling and installation of asphalt mix. Liquid asphalt is a by-product of oil production. An increase in the price of oil increases the cost of asphalt, which is likely to decrease demand for asphalt and therefore decrease demand for certain Company products. While increasing oil prices may have a negative financial impact on many of the Company’s customers, the Company’s equipment can use a significant amount of recycled asphalt pavement, thereby mitigating the final cost of asphalt for the customer. The Company continues to develop products and initiatives to reduce the amount of oil and related products required to produce asphalt mix. Oil price volatility makes it difficult to predict the costs of oil-based products used in road construction such as liquid asphalt and gasoline. The Company’s customers appear to be adapting their prices in response to the fluctuating oil prices, and the fluctuations did not appear to significantly impair equipment purchases in 2010 or the first quarter of 2011. The Company expects oil prices to continue to fluctuate during the remainder of 2011. Minor fluctuations in oil prices should not have a significant impact on customers’ buying decisions. However, political uncertainty in oil producing countries, interruptions in oil production due to disasters, whether natural or man-made, or other economic factors could significantly impact oil prices, which in turn could negatively impact demand for the Company’s products.

Contrary to the negative impact of higher oil prices on many of the Company’s products as discussed above, sales of several of the Company’s products, including products manufactured by the Underground Group, which are used to drill for oil and natural gas and install oil and natural gas pipelines, would benefit from higher oil and natural gas prices, to the extent that such higher prices lead to further development of oil and natural gas production. The Company believes further development of domestic oil and natural gas production capabilities is needed and would positively impact the domestic economy and the Company’s business.

Steel is a major component in the Company’s equipment. Steel pricing declined sharply in the fourth quarter of 2008 and into 2009. Favorable pricing continued through 2009, causing steel mills to reduce production to match reduced demand. Steel customers worked through their excess inventories of steel during 2009 and began buying steel again in 2010, albeit at reduced levels, causing steel prices to remain relatively stable.  Near the end of 2010, as the result of an increase in the price of certain raw materials used to make steel, steel prices began a rapid series of increases that will likely continue through the second quarter of 2011. The Company was able to mitigate a portion of this increase in price of steel in the first quarter of 2011 as a result of its advanced steel purchases and existing supply contracts at previously negotiated prices. The Company may experience rising steel prices during the second quarter of 2011; however, management believes that steel prices will remain stable in the second half of 2011. Although the Company normally institutes price increases in response to rising steel and component prices, the Company may not be able to raise the prices of its products enough to cover increased costs, which may have a negative effect on the Company’s financial results. The Company will continue to closely monitor steel pricing and will take advantage of buying opportunities to offset such future pricing where possible.

In addition to the factors stated above, many of the Company’s markets are highly competitive, and its products compete worldwide with a number of other manufacturers and dealers that produce and sell similar products. During 2010 and through the first quarter of 2011, a weakening dollar, combined with improving economic conditions in certain foreign economies, had a positive impact on the Company’s international sales. The Company expects the dollar to remain weak in the near-term relative to most foreign currencies; however, increasing domestic interest rates or weakening economic conditions abroad could cause the dollar to strengthen, which may negatively impact the Company’s international sales.

In the United States and internationally, the Company’s equipment is marketed directly to customers as well as through dealers. During 2010, 75% to 80% of equipment sold by the Company was sold directly to the end user. The Company expects this ratio to remain relatively consistent through 2011.

 
18

 


The Company is operated on a decentralized basis, and there is a complete management team for each operating subsidiary. Finance, insurance, legal, shareholder relations, corporate accounting and other corporate matters are primarily handled at the corporate level (i.e., Astec Industries, Inc., the parent company). The engineering, design, sales, manufacturing and basic accounting functions are all handled at each individual subsidiary. Standard accounting procedures are prescribed and followed in all reporting.

The non-union employees of each subsidiary have the opportunity to earn profit-sharing incentives in the aggregate up to 10% of each subsidiary’s after-tax profit if such subsidiary meets established goals. These goals are based on the subsidiary’s return on capital employed, cash flow on capital employed and safety. The profit-sharing incentives for subsidiary presidents are normally paid from a separate corporate pool.

Results of Operations

Net Sales
Net sales increased $36,735,000 or 19.0%, from $193,454,000 for the first quarter of 2010 to $230,189,000 in the first quarter of 2011. Sales are generated primarily from new equipment and related parts purchases made by customers for use in construction for infrastructure funded by both the private and public sectors. The overall increase in sales for the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 reflects strengthening economic conditions in both international and domestic markets.

Domestic sales for the first quarter of 2011 were $147,523,000 or 64.1% of consolidated net sales compared to $129,451,000 or 66.9% of consolidated net sales for the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $18,072,000, or 14.0%.  International sales for the first quarter of 2011 were $82,666,000 or 35.9% of consolidated net sales compared to $64,003,000 or 33.1% of consolidated net sales for the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $18,663,000 or 29.2%.  The overall increase in international sales for the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 is due to improved economic conditions in international markets and significant weakness in the dollar compared to currencies in many of the markets the Company serves. The increases in international sales occurred primarily in South America, Europe, Canada, Russia and Australia.

Parts sales for the first quarter increased 14.0% or $7,061,000 from $50,264,000 in 2010 to $57,325,000 in 2011.  Parts sales for the first quarter of 2011 as a percentage of net sales decreased 110 basis points from 26.0% in 2010 to 24.9% in 2011 due to equipment sales increasing faster than part sales.

Gross Profit
Consolidated gross profit for the first quarter increased 18.6% or $8,563,000 from $46,141,000 in 2010 to $54,704,000 in 2011; however gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased 10 basis points to 23.8% in the first quarter of 2011 from 23.9% in the first quarter of 2010. Absorption of manufacturing overhead increased by $4,019,000 due to higher production volumes resulting from increased sales.  Parts sales, which typically yield a higher gross margin, decreased as a percentage of net sales from 26.0% in the first quarter of 2010 to 24.9% in the first quarter of 2011.

Selling, General, Administrative and Engineering Expenses
Selling, general, administrative and engineering expenses for the first quarter of 2011 were $39,489,000, or 17.2% of net sales, compared to $32,718,000, or 16.9% of net sales, for the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $6,771,000, or 20.7%.  The increase was composed of increases in payroll and related expenses of $3,472,000, commissions of $1,166,000 and expenses of $2,655,000 related to ConExpo, the triennial equipment show held in March of 2011.  These increases in expenses were offset by a decrease in health insurance expense of $1,587,000.

Interest Expense
Interest expense in the first quarter of 2011 decreased $87,000, or 70.7%, to $36,000 from $123,000 in the first quarter of 2010.

Other Income, net of expenses
Other income, net of expenses was $406,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $488,000 in the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $82,000, or 16.8%.  Other income is generated primarily by investments held by Astec Insurance, the Company’s captive insurance company.

 
19

 

Income Tax
Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2011 was $5,427,000, compared to income tax expense of $4,956,000 for the first quarter of 2010. The effective tax rates for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 were 34.8% and 35.9%, respectively.   The difference in effective tax rates for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 is related to research and development tax credits which were recognized in the first quarter of 2011 but not in the first quarter of 2010 due to the timing of Congressional approval of the credits.

Net Income
The Company had net income attributable to controlling interest of $10,144,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $8,794,000 in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $1,350,000, or 15.4%. Earnings per diluted share were $0.44 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $0.39 in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $0.05 or 12.8%. Diluted shares outstanding for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were 22,919,430 and 22,767,460, respectively. The increase in shares outstanding is primarily due to the exercise of stock options by employees of the Company.

Backlog
The backlog of orders at March 31, 2011 was $244,808,000 compared to $134,838,000 at March 31, 2010, an increase of $109,970,000, or 81.6%. The increase in backlog is due to an increase in domestic backlogs of $42,642,000 or 55.1% and an increase in international backlogs of $67,328,000 or 117.3%.  The increase in total backlog was primarily due to increases in the Aggregate and Mining Group of $51,131,000 or 124.2% and the Asphalt Group of $41,051,000 or 58.3%.  The March 31, 2011 backlog was comprised of 49.1% domestic orders and 50.9% international orders as compared to 57.4% domestic orders and 42.6% international orders at March 31, 2010.  The Company is unable to determine whether the changes in backlogs were experienced by the industry as a whole; however, the Company believes the changes in backlogs reflect the current economic conditions the industry is experiencing.

Segment Net Sales-Quarter (in thousands):
 
   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
   
2011
   
2010
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
Asphalt Group
 
  $ 73,754     $ 70,061     $ 3,693       5.3 %
Aggregate and Mining Group
 
    78,853       58,919       19,934       33.8 %
Mobile Asphalt Paving Group
 
    49,955       42,082       7,873       18.7 %
Underground Group
 
    11,667       8,927       2,740       30.7 %
Other Group
 
    15,960       13,465       2,495       18.5 %

Asphalt Group: Sales in this group were $73,754,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $70,061,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $3,693,000 or 5.3%.  Domestic sales for the Asphalt Group decreased $5,223,000 or 8.8% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  Domestic sales continued to be impacted by Congress’s failure to renew the long-term federal highway funding legislation that expired in September 2009.  International sales for the Asphalt Group increased $8,916,000 or 83.0% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  The improvement in international sales is due to improved economic conditions and significant weakness in the dollar compared to currencies in many of the markets the Company serves.  In the first quarter international sales increased primarily in Canada and Europe while decreasing in Mexico and South America.  Parts sales for the Asphalt Group increased 13.9% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

 
20

 


Aggregate and Mining Group: Sales in this group were $78,853,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $58,919,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $19,934,000 or 33.8%.  Domestic sales for the Aggregate and Mining Group increased $13,485,000 or 60.0% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Domestic sales were positively impacted by improving domestic economic conditions and increasing activity in domestic mining. International sales for the Aggregate and Mining Group increased $6,449,000 or 17.7% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The improvement in international sales is due to improved economic conditions and significant weakness in the dollar compared to currencies in many of the markets the Company serves.  The increase in international sales occurred primarily in South America.  These increases were offset by decreases in the Middle East, Mexico and Canada.  Parts sales for this group increased 16.2% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group: Sales in this group were $49,955,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $42,082,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $7,873,000 or 18.7%.  Domestic sales for the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group increased $5,377,000 or 15.1% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  The lack of a long-term highway bill caused customers to focus on short-term contracts for road overlay, which positively impacted domestic sales for this group.  International sales for the Mobile Asphalt Paving Group increased $2,495,000 or 38.9% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, due primarily to weakness in the dollar relative to currencies in many foreign countries, as well as stimulus plans in certain foreign countries that focused on road building. The increase internationally occurred primarily in Russia and Central America and was offset by decreased sales in Canada.  Parts sales for this group increased 16.6% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Underground Group: Sales in this group were $11,667,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $8,927,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2,740,000 or 30.7%.  Domestic sales for the Underground Group increased $2,628,000 or 58.5% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 due primarily to improving domestic economic conditions.  International sales for the Underground Group increased $112,000 or 2.5% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  The increase in international sales occurred in Canada and South America. Parts sales for the Underground Group decreased 10.3% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Other Group: Sales for the Other Group were $15,960,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $13,465,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2,495,000 or 18.5%.  Domestic sales for the Other Group, which are primarily generated by Peterson Pacific Corp., increased $1,806,000 or 24.1% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, due primarily to improving domestic economic conditions. International sales for the Other Group increased $689,000 or 11.6% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  The increase occurred in Australia and was offset by declines in South America and Canada. Parts sales for the Other Group increased 25.7% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

 
Segment Profit (Loss)-Quarter (in thousands):
 
   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
   
2011
   
2010
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
Asphalt Group
 
  $ 10,820     $ 12,795     $ (1,975 )     (15.4 %)
Aggregate and Mining Group
 
    5,622       2,822       2,800       99.2 %
Mobile Asphalt Paving Group
 
    7,312       5,210       2,102       40.3 %
Underground Group
 
    (3,849 )     (3,542 )     (307 )     (8.7 %)
Other Group
 
    (8,500 )     (7,510 )     (990 )     (13.2 %)


 
21

 


Asphalt Group: Segment profit for this group was $10,820,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $12,795,000 for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $1,975,000 or 15.4%. This decrease is due primarily to a decrease in sales for the Asphalt Group as well as a decline in gross profit percentage from 28.8% in the first quarter of 2010 to 26.1% in the first quarter of 2011.  The gross profit percentage returned to a normal level in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the higher percentage for the first quarter of 2010, which was the result of a few very high margin sales transactions that were recognized in the first quarter of 2010.

Aggregate and Mining Group: Segment profit for this group was $5,622,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $2,822,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2,800,000 or 99.2%.  This group’s profits were positively impacted by a 33.8% increase in sales and a 140 basis point increase in gross margin aided by a 16.2% increase in parts sales for the quarter and improved plant utilization.

Mobile Asphalt Paving Group: Segment profit for this group was $7,312,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $5,210,000 in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $2,102,000 or 40.3%. The primary reason for the increase in profit was an increase in gross margin of 190 basis points during the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 due to increased demand and production volumes.

Underground Group: This group had a segment loss of $3,849,000 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a loss of $3,542,000 in the first quarter of 2010 for a decrease of $307,000 or 8.7% due to increased selling expenses, primarily ConExpo related.

Other Group: The Other Group had a segment loss of $8,500,000 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a loss of $7,510,000 in the first quarter of 2010 for a decrease of $990,000 or 13.2%. This group includes the parent company, Astec Industries, Inc., which records all of the domestic federal tax expense for the Company as well as other non-allocable administrative costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are its cash on hand, investments, borrowing capacity under a $100 million revolving credit facility and cash flows from operations. The Company had $80,171,000 of cash available for operating purposes at March 31, 2011. In addition, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under its credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) at any time during the first quarter ended March 31, 2011. Net of letters of credit of $7,608,000, the Company had borrowing availability of $92,392,000 under the credit facility as of March 31, 2011.

The Wells Fargo credit facility had an original term of three years with two one-year extensions available. Early in 2010, the Company exercised the final extension bringing the new loan maturity date to May 2012. The interest rate for borrowings is a function of the Adjusted LIBOR Rate or Adjusted LIBOR Market Index Rate, as defined, as elected by the Company, plus a margin based upon a leverage ratio pricing grid ranging between 0.5% and 1.5%. As of March 31, 2011, the applicable margin based upon the leverage ratio pricing grid was equal to 0.5%. The unused facility fee is 0.125%. The Wells Fargo credit facility requires no principal amortization and interest only payments are due, in the case of loans bearing interest at the Adjusted LIBOR Market Index Rate, monthly in arrears and, in the case of loans bearing interest at the Adjusted LIBOR Rate, at the end of the applicable interest period. The Wells Fargo credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum tangible net worth and maximum allowed capital expenditures. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under its credit facility as of March 31, 2011.

 
22

 

The Company's South African subsidiary, Osborn Engineered Products SA (Pty) Ltd. (“Osborn”), has available a credit facility of $8,833,000 (ZAR 60,000,000) to finance short-term working capital needs, as well as to cover performance letters of credit, advance payment and retention guarantees. As of March 31, 2011, Osborn had no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, but $3,760,000 in performance letters of credit, advance payment and retention guarantees were issued under the facility.  The facility is secured by Osborn's buildings and improvements, accounts receivable, cash balances and a $2,000,000 letter of credit issued by the parent Company.  As of March 31, 2011, Osborn had available credit under the facility of $5,073,000.  The facility has an ongoing, indefinite term subject to annual reviews by the bank.  The interest rate is the South African prime rate.  The agreement has an unused facility fee of 0.793%.

The Company’s Australian subsidiary, Astec Australia Pty Ltd (“Astec Australia”) has an available credit facility to finance short-term working capital needs of $827,000 (AUD 800,000), and banking arrangements to finance foreign exchange dealer limit orders of up to $1,705,000 (AUD 1,650,000) secured by cash balances in the amount of $1,033,000 (AUD 1,000,000) and a $1,000,000 letter of credit issued by the parent Company.  No amounts were outstanding under the credit facility at March 31, 2011.  The interest rate is the Australian adjusted Bank Business Rate plus a margin of 1.05%.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
   
Increase
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
(Decrease)
 
Net income
  $ 10,158     $ 8,832     $ 1,326  
Non-cash items in net income, net
    9,553       8,457       1,096  
Changes in working capital:
                       
(Increase) decrease in receivables
    (20,053 )     (15,116 )     (4,937 )
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses
    1,581       6,316       (4,735 )
(Increase) decrease in inventories
    (21,292 )     815       (22,107 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    7,631       5,783       1,848  
Increase (decrease) in customer deposits
    986       (3,572 )     4,558  
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable
    4,638       1,150       3,488  
Other, net
    (3,577 )     (3,036 )     (541 )
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
  $ (10,375 )   $ 9,629     $ (20,004 )

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash from operating activities decreased $20,004,000 compared to the same period in 2010.  The primary reasons for the decrease in operating cash flows are an increase in cash used by inventory of $22,107,000, receivables of $4,937,000 and prepaid expenses of $4,735,000.  These negative cash changes were offset by a decrease in cash from customer deposits of $4,558,000 and income taxes payable of $3,488,000.  These changes in operating cash flows reflect increased sales and production activity during the first three months of 2011 compared to the first three months of 2010.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
   
Increase
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
(Decrease)
 
Expenditures for property and equipment
  $ (3,964 )   $ (1,751 )   $ (2,213 )
Other, net
    49       20       29  
Net cash used by investing activities
  $ (3,915 )   $ (1,731 )   $ (2,184 )

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash used by investing activities increased $2,184,000 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to an increase in cash used for capital expenditures of $2,213,000.

 
23

 


Capital expenditures for 2011 are forecasted to total $29,382,000. The Company expects to finance these expenditures using currently available cash balances, internally generated funds and available credit under the Company’s credit facility. Capital expenditures are generally for machinery, equipment and facilities used by the Company in the production of its various products.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
March 31,
   
Increase
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
(Decrease)
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
  $ 20     $ 272     $ (252 )
Other, net
    (47 )     (3 )     (44 )
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
  $ (27 )   $ 269     $ (296 )

Cash from financing activities decreased $296,000 in the first three months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Financial Condition
The Company’s current assets increased to $474,228,000 at March 31, 2011 from $447,821,000 at December 31, 2010, an increase of $26,407,000, or 5.9%.  The increase is primarily attributable to an increase inventories of $19,682,000 combined with an increase in trade receivables of $20,007,000. The increase in inventories is due to increased manufacturing activity in response to increased sales volumes.  The increase in trade receivables is due primarily to an increase in sales volume in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. These increases were offset by decreases in cash and cash equivalents of $14,426,000.

The Company’s current liabilities increased to $144,808,000 at March 31, 2011 from $130,426,000 at December 31, 2010, an increase of $14,382,000, or 11.0%.  The increase is primarily attributable to increases in accounts payable of $7,631,000 and income taxes payable of $4,630,000.  Accounts payable increased in the first quarter of 2011 due primarily to increased purchases of inventory related to increased sales volumes.  Income taxes payable increased during the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to increased earnings compared to the fourth quarter of 2010.

Market Risk and Risk Management Policies
We have no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Seasonality
The Company’s businesses are subject to the effects of seasonality. Consequently, the operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 for each business segment, and for the Company as a whole, are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.  Based upon historical results of the past several years, 25% to 28% of the Company's annual revenues typically occur during the first three months of the year.

Contractual Obligations
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no substantial changes in our commitments or contractual liabilities.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We have no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 
24

 


Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.   The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved from time to time in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. Other than as set forth in Part I, “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we currently have no pending or threatened litigation that we believe will result in an outcome that would materially affect our business. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that future litigation to which we become a party will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our Company.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

Item 6.  Exhibits

Exhibit No.
 
                                   Description                                                                                                                       
  3.1  
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Astec Industries Inc, adopted on March 14, 1990 and as amended on
   July 29, 1993, July 27, 2007 and July 23, 2008.
  31.1  
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2  
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32*  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**
 
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

The Exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.  Inapplicable Exhibits are not included in the list.

* In accordance with Release No. 34-47551, this exhibit is hereby furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
 
 
25

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant)
 
     
     
Date: May 10, 2011
/s/ J. Don Brock               
 
 
J. Don Brock
Chairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
     
 
 
 
Date: May 10, 2011
/s/ F. McKamy Hall             
 
 
F. McKamy Hall
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 


   
EXHIBIT INDEX
  3.1  
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Astec Industries Inc, adopted on March 14, 1990 and as amended on
   July 29, 1993, July 27, 2007 and July 23, 2008.
  31.1  
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2  
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase


 
 
26


Exhibit 3-1
 
 
AMENDED AND RESTATED
BYLAWS OF
ASTEC INDUSTRTES. INC.
(A Tennessee Corporation)


ARTICLE 1
SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS
1.1            Annual Meetings .  An Annual Meeting of the Shareholders shall be held on the third Thursday in April of each year, or, if the notice of the meeting designates it as an annual meeting, at any date within the six months following the close of the fiscal year, the date to be determined by the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Secretary, or the Board.  The business to be transacted at such meeting shall be the election of Directors and such other business as shall be properly brought before the meeting.

1.2            Special Meetings .  Special meetings of the Shareholders may be called by the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Secretary, or by the Board.  A special meeting of the Shareholders shall be held if the holders of at least ten percent (10%) of all the votes entitled to be cast on any issue proposed to be considered at the proposed special meeting sign, date and deliver to the Secretary one or more written demands for the meeting describing the purpose or purposes for which such special meeting is to be held.

1.3            Place of Meetings .  Shareholder meetings shall be held at the principal office of the corporation or at any other place, within or without the State of Tennessee, as indicated in the notice of the meeting, or in the event of a meeting held pursuant to a waiver of notice, as set forth in the waiver.

1.4            Notice Requirements .  Written or printed notice stating the date, time and place of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called and the person or persons calling the meeting, shall be delivered either personally or by mail by or at the direction of the President, the Secretary or the person or persons calling the meeting, to each Shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting and to any other Shareholder who will be entitled to dissent from an action on which Shareholders are to vote at the meeting.  Such notice shall be given not less that 10 days nor more than two months before the date of the meeting and, if mailed, shall be deemed to be given when deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Shareholder at his address shown in the corporation’s current record of Shareholders, with first-class postage thereon prepaid and, if delivered personally, shall be deemed given when actually received by the Shareholder.

1.5            Waiver of Notice .  A Shareholder may waive any notice required by the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, the charter or these bylaws before or after the date and time stated in such notice.  The waiver must be in writing, signed by the Shareholder entitled to notice and delivered to the corporation for inclusion in the minutes or filing with the corporate records.  A Shareholder’s attendance at a meeting shall (i) waive objection to lack of notice or defective notice of the meeting, except where a Shareholder at the beginning of the meeting (or promptly upon his arrival) objects to holding the meeting or transacting business at the meeting; and (ii) waive objection to consideration of a particular matter at the meeting that is not within the purpose or purposes described in the meeting notice, unless the Shareholder objects to considering the matter when it is presented.

1.6            Voting Groups; Quorum .  All shares entitled to vote and be counted together collectively on a matter at a meeting of shareholders shall be a “voting group”.  Shares entitled to vote as a separate voting group may take action on a matter at a meeting only if a quorum of those shares exists with respect to that matter.  Except as otherwise required by the Tennessee Business Corporation Act or provided in the charter, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter by a voting group constitutes a quorum of the voting group for action on that matter.

Once a share is represented for any purpose at a meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the meeting and for any adjournment of that meeting unless a new record date is or must be set for that adjourned meeting.

1.7            Voting .  Unless otherwise provided by the Tennessee Business Corporation Act or the charter, every outstanding share shall be entitled to one vote on each matter voted on at a Shareholders’ meeting.  Whenever any Corporate action, other than the election of Directors and except as otherwise provided by the charter, is to be taken by vote of the Shareholders, it shall be taken if a quorum is present and if the votes cast within the voting group in favor of the action exceed the votes cast opposing the action.  Directors shall be elected by a majority of the votes represented and entitled to vote at an annual meeting at which a quorum is present.

1.8            Proxies .  A Shareholder may vote his shares in person or by proxy.  A Shareholder may appoint a proxy to vote or otherwise act for him by signing an appointment either personally or by his attorney-in-fact.  An appointment of a proxy is effective when received by the Secretary or other officer or agent authorized to tabulate votes.  An appointment is valid for eleven (11) months unless another period is expressly provided in the appointment form.  An appointment of a proxy is revocable by the shareholder unless the appointment form conspicuously states that it is irrevocable and the appointment is coupled with an interest.  If the validity of any appointment of proxy is questioned, it must be submitted to the Secretary of the meeting of Shareholders for examination or to a proxy officer or committee appointed by the person presiding at the meeting.  The Secretary of the meeting or, if appointed, the proxy officer or committee, shall determine the validity or invalidity of any appointment of proxy submitted and reference by the Secretary in the Minutes of the meeting to the regularity of an appointment of proxy shall be received as prima facie evidence of the facts stated for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum at the meeting and for all other purposes.

1.9            Action Without Meeting .  Action required or permitted by the Tennessee Business Corporation Act to be taken at a Shareholders’ meeting may only be taken without a meeting if all Shareholders entitled to vote on the action consent to taking such action without a meeting.  If the required consent is obtained, the affirmative vote of the number of shares that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting is the act of the Shareholders.

The action must be evidenced by one or more written consents describing the action taken, signed by each Shareholder entitled to vote on the action, indicating such signing Shareholder’s vote or abstention on the action and delivered to the corporation for inclusion in the Minutes or for filing with the Corporate records.

If the Tennessee Business Corporation Act or the charter requires that notice of a proposed action be given to nonvoting Shareholders and the action is to be taken by consent of the voting Shareholders, then the corporation will give such nonvoting Shareholders written notice of the proposed action at least ten (10) days before such action is taken.  Such notice will contain or be accompanied by the same material that would have been required to be sent to nonvoting Shareholders in a notice of a meeting at which the proposed action would have been submitted to the Shareholders for action.

1.10            Presiding Officer and Secretary .  Meetings of the Shareholders shall be presided over by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or if he is not present, by the President, or if neither the Chairman nor the President is present, by a Chairman to be chosen by a majority of the Shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting.  The Secretary or, in his absence, an assistant Secretary shall act as Secretary of every meeting, but if neither the Secretary nor an assistant Secretary is present, the Shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting shall choose any person present to act as Secretary of the meeting.

1.11            Adjournments .  Whether or not a quorum is present to organize a meeting, any meeting of Shareholders (including an adjourned meeting) may be adjourned by the holders of a majority of the voting shares represented at the meeting to reconvene at a specific time and place, but no later than four (4) months after the date fixed for the original meeting unless the requirements of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act concerning the selection of a new record date have been met.  At any reconvened meeting within that time period, any business may be transacted that could have been transacted at the meeting that was adjourned.  If notice of the adjourned meeting was properly given, it shall not be necessary to give any notice of the reconvened meeting or of the business to be transacted if the date, time and place of the reconvened meeting are announced at the meeting that was adjourned and before adjournment; provided, however, that if a new record date is or must be fixed, notice of the reconvened meeting must be given to persons who are Shareholders as of the new record date.

ARTICLE 2
STOCK

2.1            Authorization and Issuance of Shares .  In accordance with the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, the Board of Directors may authorize shares of any class or series provided for in the charter to be issued for any consideration valid under the provisions of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act.  To the extent provided in the charter, the Board of Directors shall determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the shares.

2.2            Stock Certificates .  The shares of the corporation shall be represented by certificates which shall be in such form as the Board of Directors shall from time to time adopt.  Share certificates shall be numbered consecutively, shall be in registered form, shall indicate the date of issuance, the name of the corporation and that it is organized under the laws of the State of Tennessee, the name of the Shareholder, and the number and class of shares and the designation of the series, if any, represented by the certificate.  Each share certificate shall be signed (either manually or in facsimile,) by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or a Vice President, and by the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, the Treasurer, or an Assistant Treasurer.  No Corporate seal need be affixed.

If the Board of Directors has authorized the issue of different classes of shares or different series within a class, the designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations for each class or series (and the authority of the board of directors to determine variations for future classes or series) will be summarized on the front or back of each certificate.  Alternatively, each certificate will state on its front or back that the corporation will furnish the Shareholder this information in writing, without charge, upon request.

2.3            Shareholders of Record .  The corporation shall keep a record of its Shareholders, arranged by voting group (and within each voting group by class or series of shares) and giving the names and addresses of all shareholders and the number of shares held by each.  After fixing a record date for a meeting, such record; listing in alphabetical order the Shareholders as of the record date, shall be available for inspection by any Shareholder, beginning two (2) business days after notice of the meeting is given and continuing through the meeting, at the corporation’s principal office or at a place identified in the meeting notice in the city where the meeting will be held.

2.4            Record Date With Regard to Shareholder Actions .  For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of a shareholders’ meeting, to demand a special meeting, to vote, or to take any other action, the board of directors may fix a date as the record date, such date to be not more than seventy (70) days before the meeting or action requiring such determination of Shareholders.  A determination of Shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at a Shareholders’ meeting is effective for any adjournment of the meeting unless the Board of Directors fixes a new record date, which it must do if the meeting is adjourned to a date more than four (4) months after the date fixed for the original meeting.  If no record date is fixed by the board of directors, the record date for any determination of Shareholders which may be proper or required by law shall be the date on which notice of the meeting is mailed in case of a Shareholder’s Meeting; and the date on which any other action, the consummation of which requires a determination of Shareholders, is taken.

2.5            Record Date With Regard to Distributions and Share Dividends .  For the purpose of determining Shareholders entitled to a distribution (other than one involving a repurchase or reacquisition of shares) or a share dividend, the board of directors may fix a date as the record date.  If no record date is fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date shall be the date the board authorizes the distribution or share dividend.

2.6            Rights of Corporation with Respect to Registered Owners .  Prior to due presentation for transfer of registration of its shares, the corporation may treat the registered owner of the shares as the person exclusively entitled to vote such shares, to receive any share dividend or distribution with respect to such shares, and for all other purposes; and the corporation shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in such shares on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise provided by law.

2.7            Transfer of Stock .  The holder’s endorsement and delivery of a certificate representing shares of the corporation shall be effective as between the parties to transfer the shares; but in all other respects no transfer shall be valid until the certificate representing the shares transferred has been surrendered by the person named in the certificate, or by an attorney lawfully constituted in writing, to the transfer agent designated to transfer the shares of the corporation and cancelled and a new certificate issued to the transferee.

2.8            Lost Stolen or Destroyed Certificates .  Any person claiming a share certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed shall make an affidavit or affirmation of the fact in the manner required by the corporation and, if the corporation requires, shall give the corporation a bond of indemnity in form and amount, and with one or more sureties satisfactory to the corporation, as the corporation may require, whereupon an appropriate new certificate may be issued in lieu of the one alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.

ARTICLE 3
DIRECTOR MEETTNGS

3.1            Meetings of Board and Committees .  The Board shall hold an annual meeting each year, without call, immediately before or after the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders.  The Board or any officer so authorized by the Board may establish a date or dates on which regular meetings of the Board or any committee shall be held between annual meetings.  A committee of the Board may meet on the dates so established or, if none, on the date set at its previous meeting or when earlier called by its Chairman or by a majority of its members.  Special meetings of the Board may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Secretary or any three Directors.

3.2            Place of Meetings .  Meetings of the Board shall be held at any place either within or without the State of Tennessee that the Board may from time to time appoint by resolution or, if no resolution is in force, at the principal office of the corporation, or at such other place as shall have been designated in the notice of the meeting, or, in the event of a meeting held pursuant to waiver of notice, as set forth in the waiver.

3.3            Notice Requirements .  No notice shall be required for any regularly scheduled meeting of the directors.  Notice of any special meeting, setting forth the date, time and place of the meeting, shall be given to each director, not less than two days before the meeting.  The purpose of any regular or special meeting need not be specified in the notice or any waiver of notice.  Such notice shall be in writing unless oral notice is reasonable under the circumstances and may be given by any usual means of communication, including in person; by telephone, telegraph, teletype, or other form of wire or wireless communication; or by mail or private carrier.  Written notice, if in a comprehensible form, is effective at the earliest of the following: (i) when received or when delivered, properly addressed, to the addressee’s last known principal place of business or residence; (ii) five days after its deposit in the mail, as evidenced by the postmark, if mailed with first-class postage, prepaid and correctly addressed; or (iii) on the date shown on the return receipt, if sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and the receipt is signed by or on behalf of the addressee.  Oral notice is effective when communicated if communicated in a comprehensible manner.

3.4            Waiver of Notice .  A Director may waive any required notice before or after the date and time stated in the notice.  Such waiver must be in writing, signed by the Director and filed with the Minutes or Corporate records,   except that a Director’s attendance at or participation in a meeting waives any required notice to him of such meeting unless the director at the beginning of the meeting (or promptly upon his arrival) objects to holding the meeting or transacting business at the meeting and does not thereafter vote for or assent to action taken at the meeting.

3.5            Quorum .  Unless a greater number is required by the charter, these bylaws, or the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, a majority of the number of directors prescribed pursuant to Paragraph 4.2 of these bylaws shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.  The presence of a majority of the members of a committee of the Board shall be required for the transaction of business.

3.6            Voting .  Unless a greater number is required by the charter, these bylaws, or the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board or any committee.

3.7            Presumption of Assent .  A Director who is present at a meeting of the Board, or any committee thereof, when Corporate action is taken shall be deemed to have assented to the action taken unless:  (i) he objects at the beginning of the meeting (or promptly upon his arrival) to holding it or transacting business at the meeting; (ii) his dissent or abstention from such action is entered in the minutes of the meeting; or (iii) he submits written notice of his dissent or abstention to the presiding officer of the meeting before the adjournment of the meeting or shall deliver or send such dissent by registered or certified mail to the secretary of the corporation promptly after the adjournment of the meeting.  Such right to dissent or abstain shall not apply to a director who voted in favor of such action.  A director who is absent from a meeting of the board, or any committee thereof, at which such action is taken shall be presumed to have assented to the action unless he shall deliver or send by registered or certified mail his dissent or abstention from such action to the secretary of the corporation or shall cause such dissent or abstention to be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the Board or committee within a reasonable time after learning of such action.

3.8            Action by Consent .  Unless the charter or these bylaws provide otherwise, the board of directors or any committee designated by the board may take action which the board or committee is required or permitted to take without a meeting by written consent, setting forth the action taken, signed in one or more counterparts by all of the directors or committee members, as the case may be, and indicating each signing Director’s vote or abstention on the action.  Such written consents shall be included in the minutes or filed with the corporate records reflecting the action taken.  The affirmative vote of the number of directors that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting is the act of the Board.

3.9            Telephone Meeting Allowed .  Participation by members of the board or any committee designated by the Board in any telephone meeting of the board or committee by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can simultaneously hear each other shall be permitted.  Participation in such a meeting pursuant to this Paragraph 3.9 shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.  The Directors shall be promptly furnished a copy of the minutes of any meeting held under this paragraph.

3.10            Adjournments .  Whether or not a quorum is present to organize a meeting, any meeting of Directors (including an adjourned meeting) may be adjourned by a majority of the Directors present, to reconvene at a specific time and place.  At any reconvened meeting any business may be transacted that could have been transacted at the meeting that was adjourned.  If notice of the adjourned meeting was properly given, it shall not be necessary to give any notice of the reconvened meeting or of the business to be transacted, if the date, time and place of the reconvened meeting are announced at the meeting that was adjourned.

ARTICLE 4
DIRECTORS

4.1            Qualifications and General Powers .  Members of the Board of Directors need not be Shareholders of the corporation and need not be residents of the State of Tennessee.  All Corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed under the direction of, the board of directors.  In addition to the powers and authority expressly conferred upon it by these bylaws, the Board of Directors may exercise all powers of the corporation and do all lawful acts and things that are not by law, by charter or by these bylaws directed or required to be exercised or done the Shareholders.

4.2            Number .  As provided in the charter of the corporation, the number of directors of the corporation shall be not less than three nor more than fifteen.  The exact number of Directors within such minimum and maximum shall be fixed or changed from time to time solely by a resolution adopted by an affirmative vote of either (i) at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total number of directors then in office or (ii) holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total issued and outstanding shares of the corporation’s stock entitled to vote in the election of Directors.

4.3            Classification, Terms and Election .  The Directors shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III.  Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the actual number of Directors constituting the entire Board of Directors.  Directors of each class were elected at the 1989 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Class I Directors for a one-year term, Class II Directors for a two-year term, and Class III Directors for a three-year term.  At each succeeding annual meeting of Shareholders, successors to the class of Directors whose term expires at that annual meeting shall be elected or re-elected for a three-year term.  Except as provided in Paragraph 4.5, a Director shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total issued and outstanding shares of the corporation’s stock represented at the annual meeting of Shareholders and entitled to vote in the election of Directors.  If the number of Directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of Directors in each class as nearly equal as possible.  In no case shall a decrease in the number of Directors have the effect of shortening the term of an incumbent Director.  If the number of directors is increased, and any newly created directorships are filled by the Board, there shall be no classification of additional directors elected by the Board until the next meeting of the Shareholders called for the purpose of electing Directors.  Each director shall serve until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or death.

4.4            Removal .  The entire Board of Directors or any individual director may be removed from office only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total issued and outstanding shares of the corporation’s stock entitled to vote in the election of directors at any Shareholders’ meeting in which notice of such purpose has been given.

4.5            Vacancies in Board .  A vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors, however occurring, whether by increase in the number of Directors, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office, death or otherwise, may be filled, until the next election of Directors by the Shareholders, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total number of Directors then remaining in office, though they constitute less than a quorum of the Board of Directors.

4.6            Election of Directors by Holders of Preferred Stock .  Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions in this Article 4, whenever the holders of any one or more classes of preferred stock or series thereof issued by the corporation shall have the right, voting separately by class or series, to elect directors at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, the number of such Directors, and the election, term of office, filling of vacancies and other features of each such directorship, shall be governed by the terms of the charter or any designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions upon any such class of preferred stock or series thereof issued pursuant to subparagraph 6B of the charter (collectively, a “Preferred Stock Designation”), and such Directors so elected shall not be divided into classes pursuant to this Article 4.

4.7            Committees .  The Board by resolution may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees, each consisting of one or more Directors, and may delegate to such committee or committees all such authority of the board that it deems desirable, subject to limitations set forth in the charter, these bylaws, or the Tennessee Business Corporation Act.  The committee shall report any action taken to the meeting of the board next following the taking of such action, unless the board otherwise requires.  The Board may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any such committee, who may replace any absent member or members at any meeting of the committee.  Each such committee, and each member of each such committee, shall serve at the pleasure of the board.  The designation of any such committee and the delegation thereto of authority shall not relieve any Director of any responsibility imposed by law.  So far as applicable, the provisions of these bylaws and of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act relating to the Board and its deliberations shall be applicable to any committee of the Board.

4.8            Compensation .  Unless the charter provides otherwise, the Board of Directors may determine from time to time the compensation, if any, Directors may receive for their services as directors.  A Director may also serve the corporation in a capacity other than that of Director and receive compensation, as determined by the Board of Directors, for services rendered in any other capacity; provided, however, that the Board shall have the number of “Independent Directors” as may be required for listing of the corporation’s shares on the NASDAQ National Market System.

ARTICLE 5
OFFICERS

5.1            Titles of Officers .  The corporation shall have a Chairman of the Board, a President, one or more Vice Presidents as determined or designated by the Board, a Secretary and such other officers as are appointed by the Board.  One person may be elected to more than one office, except that the offices of President and Secretary may not be held by the same person.

5.2            Election .  All officers shall be elected or appointed at the annual meeting of the Board or at any special meeting of the Board.

5.3            Term of Office .  Each officer shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and until his successor has been elected or appointed and qualified.

5.4            Resignation and Removal .  An officer may resign at any time by delivering notice to the corporation.  Such resignation is effective when such notice is delivered unless such notice specifies a later effective date.  Any officer may be removed by the Board at any time with or without cause, but such removal shall be without prejudice to the contract rights, if any, of the person so removed.  Election or appointment of an officer shall not of itself create contract rights.

5.5            Chairman of the Board .  The Chairman of the Board, if one is elected, shall, unless otherwise provided by the Board, be the Chief Executive Officer of the corporation, and shall be considered an officer of the corporation for purposes of these bylaws and for all other purposes.

5.6            Duties .  The Secretary shall be the officer responsible for preparing Minutes of Directors’ and Shareholders’ Meetings and for authenticating records of the corporation.  All officers as between themselves and the corporation shall have such authority and perform such duties in the management of the corporation, in addition to those described in these bylaws, as usually appertain to such officers of corporations for profit, except as may be otherwise prescribed by the Board.

5.7            Compensation .  The Board shall fix the compensation, or provide for fixing the compensation, of all officers of the corporation.  The authority to fix the compensation of all officers of the corporation may be delegated to a committee of the Board.

5.8            Bonds .  The Board of Directors by resolution may require any or all of the officers, agents or employees of the corporation to give bonds to the corporation, with sufficient surety or sureties, conditioned on the faithful performance of the duties of their respective offices or positions, and to comply with any other conditions as from time to time may be required by the Board of Directors.

ARTICLE 6
INDEMNIFTCATION

6.1            Definitions .
(a)           “Corporation” for purposes of this Article 6 includes (i) any domestic or foreign predecessor entity of the corporation in a merger or other transaction in which the predecessor’s existence ceased on consummation of the transaction and (ii) subsidiaries of the corporation.

(b)           “Director” means an individual who is or was a Director of the corporation or an individual who, while a Director of the corporation, is or was serving at the corporation’s request as a Director, Officer, Partner, Trustee, Employee, or Agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or other enterprise.  A Director is considered to be serving an employee benefit plan at the corporation’s request if his duties to the corporation also impose duties on or otherwise involve services by him to the plan or to participants in or beneficiaries of the plan.  “Director” includes, unless the context requires otherwise, the estate or personal representative of a Director.

(c)           “Expenses” includes counsel fees.

(d)           “Liability” means the obligation to pay a judgment, settlement, penalty, fine (including an excise tax assessed with respect to an employee benefit plan), or reasonable expenses incurred with respect to a proceeding.

(e)           “Officer” means an individual who is or was an Officer of the corporation or an individual who, while an officer of the corporation, is or was serving at the corporation’s request as a Director, Officer, Partner, Trustee, Employee, or Agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or other enterprise.  An Officer is considered to be serving an employee benefit plan at the corporation’s request if his duties to the corporation also impose duties on or otherwise involve services by him to the plan or to participate in or beneficiaries of the plan.  “Officer” includes, unless the context requires otherwise, the estate or personal representative of an Officer.

(f)           “Official Capacity” means, when used with respect to a Director, the office of a Director of the corporation; when used with respect to an Officer, the office in the corporation held by such Officer; when used with respect to an Employee or Agent, the employment or agency relationship undertaken by the Employee or Agent on behalf of the corporation.  The term “official capacity” does not include service for any other foreign or domestic corporation or any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or other enterprise.

(g)           “Party” includes an individual who was, is, or is threatened to be made a named defendant or respondent in a proceeding.

(h)           “Proceeding” means any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative and whether formal or informal.

(i)           “Reviewing Party” shall mean the person or persons making the entitlement determination pursuant to Paragraph 6.5 below, include a court making any determination hereunder.

6.2            Basic Indemnification .
(a)           Except as provided in Paragraph 6.2(d) below, the corporation may indemnify any director or officer in the event such person is made a party to a proceeding because he is or was a director or officer against liability incurred in the proceeding if (i) he conducted himself in good faith; (ii) he reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in his official capacity, that his conduct was in the corporation’s best interests, and, in all other cases, that his conduct was at least not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

(b)           A person’s conduct with respect to an employee benefit plan for a purpose he reasonably believed to be in the interests of the participants in and beneficiaries of the plan is conduct that satisfies the requirement of Paragraph 6.2(a)(ii).

(c)           The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, or conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of itself, be determinative that the proposed indemnitee did not meet the standard of conduct set forth in Paragraph 6.2(a).

(d)           The corporation shall not, unless ordered by a court pursuant to Paragraph 6.6 below, indemnify a person under this Article 6 in connection with (i) a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation in which such person was adjudged liable to the corporation, or (ii) any proceeding charging improper personal benefit to the person, whether or not involving action in his official capacity, in which he was adjudged liable on the basis that he improperly received a personal benefit.

6.3            Mandatory Indemnification .
The corporation shall indemnify a Director or Officer who was wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he was a party because he is or was a director or officer of the corporation against reasonable expenses incurred by him in connection with the proceeding.

6.4            Advances for Expenses .
(a)           The corporation shall pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by a Director or Officer as a party to a proceeding in advance of final disposition of the proceeding if: (i) such person furnishes the corporation a written affirmation of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of conduct set forth in Paragraph 6.2(a) above; (ii) such person furnishes the corporation a written undertaking, executed personally or on his behalf, to repay the advance if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to indemnification; and (iii) a determination is made by the reviewing party that the facts then known to it would not preclude indemnification under this Article 6.

(b)           The undertaking required by Paragraph 6.4(a)(ii) above must be an unlimited general obligation of the Director or Officer but need not be secured and shall be accepted without reference to financial ability to make repayment.

(c)           Determinations under this Paragraph 6.4 shall be made in the manner specified, in Paragraph 6.5 below.

6.5            Authorization of and Determination of Entitlement to Indemnification .
(a)           The corporation may not indemnify a person under Paragraph 6.2 unless authorized in the specific case after a determination has been made that indemnification of such person is permissible in the circumstances because he has met the standard of conduct set forth in Paragraph 6.2(a).

(b)           The determination that indemnification is permissible shall be made: (i) by the board of directors of the corporation by majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors not at the time parties to the proceeding; (ii) if a quorum cannot be obtained under subparagraph (i), by majority vote of a committee duly designated by the Board of Directors (in which designation Directors who are parties may participate), consisting solely of two or more Directors not at the time parties to the proceeding; (iii) by independent special legal counsel:  (A) selected by the Board of Directors or its committee in the manner prescribed in subparagraph (i) or (ii); or (B) if a quorum of the Board of Directors cannot be obtained under subparagraph (i) and a committee cannot be designated under subparagraph (ii), selected by a majority vote of the full Board of Directors (in which selection Directors who are parties may participate); or (iv) by the shareholders, provided that shares owned by or voted under the control of proposed indemnitees who are at the time parties to the proceeding may not be voted on the determination.

(c)           Authorization of indemnification and evaluation as to reasonableness of expenses shall be made in the same manner as the determination that indemnification is permissible, except that if the determination is made by special legal counsel, authorization of indemnification and evaluation as to reasonableness of expenses shall be made by those entitled under Paragraph 6.5(b)(iii) to select counsel.

6.6            Court-Ordered Indemnification .  If a Director or Officer is a party to a proceeding, he may apply for indemnification to the court conducting the proceeding or to another court of competent jurisdiction.  On receipt of an application, the court, after giving any notice the court considers necessary, may order indemnification if it determines that: (i) such person is entitled to mandatory indemnification under Paragraph 6.3, in which case the court shall also order the corporation to pay such person’s reasonable expenses incurred to obtain court-ordered indemnification; or (ii) such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification in view of all the relevant circumstances, whether or not he met the standard of conduct set forth in Paragraph 6.2(a) above or was adjudged liable as described in Paragraph 6.2(d), but if he was adjudged so liable his indemnification is limited to reasonable expenses incurred.

6.7            Indemnification of Employees and Agents .  The corporation may indemnify and advance expenses under this Article 6 to an employee or agent of the corporation who is not a director or officer to the same extent as into a Director or Officer.

6.8            Limitations on Indemnification .  Nothing in this Article 6 shall require or permit indemnification of or on behalf of any person if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to such person establishes his liability: (i) for any breach of such person’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; or (iii) under Section 48-18-304 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act (or any successor provision thereof).

6.9            Liability Insurance .  The corporation may purchase and maintain on behalf of a person who is or was a Director, Officer, Employee or Agent of the corporation, or who, while serving as a Director, Officer, Employee or Agent of the corporation, is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a Director, Officer, Partner, Trustee, Employee or Agent of another foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or other enterprise, against liability asserted against or incurred by him in that capacity arising from his status as a Director, Officer, Employee or Agent, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him against the same liability under Sections 48-18-502 or 48-18-503 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act or under Paragraphs 6.2 or 6.3 of this Article 6.

6.10            Non-Exclusivity of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses .
(a)           The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by or granted pursuant to this Article 6 shall not be deemed to be exclusive of any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled, whether by application of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, the Charter of the corporation, the corporation’s bylaws, resolution of the Directors or Shareholders of the corporation, or an agreement providing for such indemnification; provided, however that no indemnification may be made to or on behalf of any person if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to such person establishes his liability: (i) for any breach of such person’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law; or (iii) under Section 48-18-304 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act (or any successor provision thereof).

(b)           Subject to the limitations set forth in subparagraph (a) above, the board of directors or the shareholders of the corporation may from time to time adopt resolutions providing for indemnification of Directors, Officers, Employees or Agents, or the corporation may from time to time enter into agreements with any such persons providing for indemnification, which indemnification need not be coextensive or consistent with the indemnification or advancement of expenses permitted by these bylaws.

(c)           This Article 6 shall not limit the corporation’s power to pay or reimburse expenses incurred by a person in connection with his appearance as a witness in a proceeding at a time when he was not a named defendant in or respondent to the proceeding.

6.11            Severability .  In the event that any of the provisions of this Article 6 (including any provision within a single paragraph, subparagraph, division or sentence) is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Article 6 shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

ARTTCLE 7
MISCELLANEOUS

7.1            Seal .  The corporation may have a Corporate seal which may be altered at the corporation’s pleasure; but the presence or absence of such seal on any instrument, or its addition thereto, shall not affect its character or validity or legal effect in any respect.

7.2            Stock in Other Companies .  In the absence of other arrangement by the Board, the President of the corporation may vote, endorse for transfer or take any other action necessary with respect to shares of stock and securities issued by any other corporation and owned by this corporation; and he may make, execute and deliver any proxy, waiver or consent with respect thereto.

7.3            Offices and Agent .  The corporation shall maintain a registered office in the State of Tennessee and shall have a registered agent whose business office is identical to the registered office.  In addition to its registered office, the corporation may have offices at any other place or places, within or without the State of Tennessee, as the Board of Directors may from time to time select or as the business of the corporation may require or make desirable.

ARTICLE 8
AMENDMENT

Subject to provisions to the contrary in the charter or these bylaws, these bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed, and new bylaws may be adopted, by the Shareholders or by the Board.  Any bylaw adopted by the board may be amended or repealed by the Shareholders.  The resulting bylaws may contain any provision for the regulation and management of business of the corporation not inconsistent with law and the charter.  Any amendment of the charter inconsistent with these bylaws shall operate to amend the bylaws pro tanto, and those bylaws or parts of bylaws which merely summarize or restate the provisions of the charter or the provisions of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act or other law applicable to the corporation shall be operative with respect to the corporation only so far as they are descriptive of existing law and of the charter as amended.

ARTICLE 9
TENNESSEE CONTROL SHARE ACQUISITION ACT

All control share acquisitions (as such term is defined in Section 48-35-302 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act) in respect of any capital stock of this corporation are governed by and subject to the provisions of the Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act, including Sections 48-35-308 and 48-35-309 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, and all amendments thereto; provided, however, in the event any provision of the Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act shall apply to all control share acquisitions in respect of any capital stock of this corporation.

This Article 9 can only be amended by a 2/3 vote of the Directors or a majority of the shares of the corporation’s stock then issued and outstanding entitled to vote in the election of Directors.
 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
BYLAWS OF ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
ADOPTED JULY 29, 1993

Pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors of Astec Industries, Inc. adopted at a meeting of the board of directors held on July 29, 1993, Section 4.1 of the bylaws of the corporation is deleted and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

4.1            Qualifications and General Powers .  Members of the board of directors need not be shareholders of the corporation and need not be residents of the State of Tennessee.  No person may be elected or reelected as a member of the board of directors who is 70 years of age or older.  All corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed under the direction of the board of directors.  In addition to the powers and authority expressly conferred upon it by these bylaws, the board of directors may exercise all powers of the corporation and do all lawful acts and things that are not by law, by the charter or by these bylaws directed or required to be exercised or done by the shareholders.
 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
BYLAWS OF ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
ADOPTED JULY 26, 2007

Paragraph 2.2 of the Bylaws of Astec Industries, Inc. is deleted and the following is substituted in its place:
 
2.2            Stock Certificates .  Except as set forth below with respect to uncertificated shares, the shares of the corporation shall be represented by certificates which shall be in such form as the Board of Directors shall from time to time adopt.  Share certificates shall be numbered consecutively, shall be in registered form, shall indicate the date of issuance, the name of the corporation and that it is organized under the laws of the State of Tennessee, the name of the Shareholder, and the number and class of shares and the designation of the series, if any, represented by the certificate.  Each share certificate shall be signed (either manually or in facsimile,) by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or a Vice President, and by the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, the Treasurer, or an Assistant Treasurer.  No corporate seal need be affixed.

If the Board of Directors has authorized the issue of different classes of shares or different series within a class, the designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations for each class or series (and the authority of the Board of Directors to determine variations for future classes or series) will be summarized on the front or back of each certificate.  Alternatively, each certificate will state on its front or back that the corporation will furnish the Shareholder this information in writing, without charge, upon request.

The Board of Directors shall designate the classes of shares that may be represented by uncertificated shares and shall adopt procedures for the registration of transfers of uncertificated shares in lieu of the procedures set forth in these Bylaws for certificated shares.

Adopted by the Board of Directors effective July 26, 2007.

 
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
BYLAWS OF ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
ADOPTED  JULY 23, 2008

The following amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Astec Industries, Inc. were approved by at least a two-thirds majority of the directors by action taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 23, 2008:

1).           Paragraph 4.1 as amended by the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws on July 29, 1993 is deleted in its entirety and the following Paragraph 4.1 is substituted in lieu thereof:
 
4.1            Qualifications and General Powers .  Members of the Board of Directors need not be shareholders of the corporation and need not be residents of the State of Tennessee.   All corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed under the direction of, the Board of Directors.  In addition to the powers and authority expressly conferred upon it by these Bylaws, the Board of Directors may exercise all powers of the corporation and do all lawful acts and things that are not by law, by the charter or these Bylaws directed or required to be exercised or done by the shareholders.
2).           Paragraph 4.5 is deleted and the following Paragraph 4.5 is substituted in lieu thereof:

4.5            Vacancies in Board .  A vacancy on the Board of Directors, however occurring, whether by increase in the number of Directors, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office, death or otherwise, may be filled, until the next election of Directors of the same class by the shareholders, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total number of Directors of all classes then remaining in office, even if they constitute less than a quorum of the Board of Directors.

Certified by the Secretary of the Corporation this 23rd day of July, 2008.

 
 



Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant To Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, J. Don Brock, CEO, certify that:

 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Astec Industries, Inc.;

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
 

 


 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: May 10, 2011
   
 
/s/ J. Don Brock                                               
 
J. Don Brock
 
Chairman of the Board, CEO and President
 
(Principal Executive Officer)







Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant To Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, F. McKamy Hall, CFO, certify that:

 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Astec Industries, Inc.;

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
 

 


 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  May 10, 2011

 
/s/ F. McKamy Hall                          
 
F. McKamy Hall
 
CFO, Vice President and Treasurer
 
(Principal Financial Officer)





Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant To
Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, J. Don Brock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and F. McKamy Hall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, that:

(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ J. Don Brock                                                                          
J. Don Brock
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 10, 2011


/s/ F. McKamy Hall                                                                   
F. McKamy Hall
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 10, 2011