UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
ý
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 001-33458
TERADATA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
75-3236470
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
10000 Innovation Drive
Dayton, Ohio 45342
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (866) 548-8348
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange
on which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
ý
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
¨
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 30, 2016
, was approximately
$3.2 billion
.
At
January 31, 2017
, there were approximately
130.7 million
shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
Part III:
|
Portions of the registrant’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after registrant’s fiscal year end of December 31, 2016 are incorporated herein by reference.
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
Description
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
||
|
1A.
|
||
|
1B.
|
||
|
2.
|
||
|
3.
|
||
|
4.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
||
|
6.
|
||
|
7.
|
||
|
7A.
|
||
|
8.
|
||
|
9.
|
||
|
9A.
|
||
|
9B.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
||
|
11.
|
||
|
12.
|
||
|
13.
|
||
|
14.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
||
|
16.
|
||
This report contains trademarks, service marks, and registered marks of Teradata Corporation and its subsidiaries, and other companies, as indicated.
3
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements in our public filings or other public statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or other public statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various facts and were derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important factors, and changes in such facts, assumptions or factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our future financial performance, business strategy, projected plans and objectives. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. You should understand that the factors described under “Risk Factors” and the following important factors could affect our future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:
|
•
|
our ability to timely and effectively implement our business transformation plan and the execution of our new strategy;
|
|
•
|
the rapidly changing and intensely competitive nature of the information technology (“IT”) industry and the analytic data platform business, including the ongoing consolidation activity, threats from new and emerging analytic data technologies and competitors, and pressure on achieving continued price/performance gains for analytic data solutions;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in our operating results, timing of transactions, unanticipated delays or accelerations in our sales cycles and the difficulty of accurately estimating revenues, particularly in light of our strategic shift to more revenue over time and the difficulty predicting the extent to which our customers will choose these deployment options;
|
|
•
|
our ability to successfully leverage acquisitions;
|
|
•
|
the impact of global economic fluctuations on the markets in general or on the ability of our suppliers and customers to meet their commitments to us, or the timing of purchases by our current and potential customers; and
|
|
•
|
risks inherent in operating in foreign countries, including the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, economic, political, legal, regulatory, compliance, cultural and other conditions abroad.
|
Other factors not identified above, including the risk factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by our forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to anticipate and are generally beyond our reasonable control. We undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Item 1. BUSINESS
Overview.
Teradata Corporation ("we," "us," "Teradata," or the "Company") is a global leader in analytics solutions and services. We empower companies to achieve high-impact business outcomes through analytics at scale, enabled by our technology. We help customers know how and where to use analytics and data to drive business value. We also help customers architect their analytical ecosystem to match technology choices to business needs, and we deploy analytics technology that businesses can scale to meet their growing data analytic needs. Our strategy is to deliver business value by being the best analytical partner to the world’s leading firms across a broad set of industries who have high-priority and complex analytical needs.
Our offerings include analytics solutions, ecosystem architecture consulting and hybrid cloud solutions. These solutions include software and hardware technology components such as data warehousing, big data, and tools for data integration, data discovery, and business intelligence. Our services help companies architect, manage, and
4
integrate their complex and ever-changing analytic ecosystem, and include technology and data architecture consulting, analytic business consulting, open source consulting, and “as-a-service” offerings in the cloud. Additionally, we offer a comprehensive set of support services. In 2016, we announced our new Teradata Everywhere
TM
offering through which we provide our Teradata database software in a production-scale and deployment agnostic manner. As a result, we now offer our customers flexible deployment options on-premises, in a private cloud, in the public cloud, in the cloud at a Teradata data center or as a hybrid combination of these offerings.Teradata operates from numerous locations within the United States ("U.S.") with the primary locations being Dayton, Ohio; Johns Creek (Atlanta), Georgia; and Rancho Bernardo (San Diego), California. In addition, we have sales, services, research and development, and administrative offices located in 45 countries.
For the full year ended
December 31, 2016
, we had net income of
$125 million
and total revenues of
$2.322 billion
, of which approximately
97%
was derived from the data and analytics segment and
3%
from the marketing applications segment, which was sold on July 1, 2016. For financial information about these segments and geographic information, see “Note 11—Segment, Other Supplemental Information and Concentrations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report.
History.
Teradata was formed in 1979 as a Delaware corporation, driven by the need for robust computing power to harness the value of aggregated data. In 1984, Teradata established a massively parallel relational database management system that enabled companies to easily scale their data management needs, revolutionizing data analysis for customers. In 1991, AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") acquired NCR Corporation ("NCR") and, later that year, the combined company of AT&T / NCR purchased Teradata.
In 1996, AT&T spun off NCR (including Teradata) to form the independent, publicly-traded NCR. On September 30, 2007, the independent, publicly-traded Teradata Corporation (NYSE: TDC) was created when NCR was effectively separated into two independent, publicly-traded companies through the distribution of 100% of its Teradata data warehousing business to shareholders of NCR.
Since that time, we have increased our investments and focus to be the best analytical partner to the world’s leading firms. We continue to invest to extend our research and development in analytics and analytic consulting.
On July 1, 2016, we completed the sale of our marketing applications business to exclusively focus on our analytics solutions business, in support of our transformation plans.
Industry and Market Opportunity
Our view is that analytics is and will continue to be a management priority for most companies and, in particular, for the majority of our customers. We believe we have a large market opportunity, as Teradata’s strategy encompasses the multi-billion dollar and growing markets of data management, analytic tools and consulting, and packaged analytics, as well as the related consulting and accompanying maintenance services. As organizations work to manage the evolution to increasing digital environments, we believe that they will need help leveraging analytics to deliver high-impact business outcomes. We also believe that companies will need help to implement the right analytic ecosystem architecture, leveraging both commercial and open source technologies. We have tailored Teradata's offerings to meet these needs and to help companies navigate the multitude of ecosystem options, as well as various alternatives for deployment.
We are focused on the 500 largest analytic opportunities globally as we believe that this portion of the market will have the highest growth in the amount of data analytic processing power they consume. We plan to grow revenue in this market segment by expanding our existing customers' analytical ecosystems as well as adding new customers. Overall, we believe that key differentiators for Teradata include the following:
|
•
|
Proven experience in solving complex analytical problems,
|
|
•
|
Real-world expertise deploying ecosystems and analytics, and
|
|
•
|
Leading production-scale, deployment agnostic technologies.
|
Customers.
Our new strategy prioritizes our sales focus on business users, as well as technology buyers at leading companies across a broad set of industries, including banking/financial services, communications (including telecommunications, e-business, and media and entertainment), energy, government, insurance and healthcare,
5
manufacturing, oil and gas, retail, travel and transportation logistics, and utilities. These industries provide a good fit for our analytics solutions and services, as they tend to have the greatest analytic potential, with large and growing data volumes, and expanding sources of data, complex data management requirements, or large and varied groups of users.
The extent to which any given customer contributes to our revenues generally varies significantly from year to year and quarter to quarter. Therefore, a customer with a large order in one quarter is likely to generate additional revenue for Teradata in subsequent periods as we provide support services and additional capacity as their analytical ecosystem evolves and grows to meet their business requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, our top ten customers collectively accounted for approximately 15% of our total revenues. Moreover, Teradata’s revenue can vary considerably from period to period given the different growth and purchasing patterns of our existing customers’ data warehouse systems, discovery platforms and data management platforms as well as the variable timing of new customer orders. Due to the size and complexity of these transactions (purchases), the sales cycle for a new analytic solution is often fairly long (typically more than a year). Historically, our results in any particular quarter have generally been dependent on our ability to generate a relatively small number of large orders for that quarter. However, we are actively converting customers from perpetual to over time pricing models, which will likely create many more smaller, but more frequent transactions, which will likely decrease the overall variability in the timing of our revenue as we transition to new operating expense-based deployment and purchasing options.
Our Strategy
Teradata is focusing on addressing the needs of the analytics future, as we enable organizations to deliver value through analytics. Through our consultative approach, focused on leading with business outcomes, our goal is to serve as a trusted advisor to both the business and technical leaders in our customers’ organizations. Our business analytics solutions are ideally suited for the world’s largest companies who have the most complex analytics requirements and the need to scale. Teradata’s focus is on being “business outcome led, technology enabled”, as we deliver business value through analytics, as a trusted advisor to both business buyers and IT buyers. Our strategic approach is to make it easy to buy and grow with Teradata. We believe that this strategic approach will best position us to be our customers’ trusted advisor and analytic partner of choice.
Our Solutions
There are three key solutions in our portfolio which support our strategy and which drive consumption of Teradata database software: Hybrid Cloud Solutions, Business Analytics Solutions and Ecosystem Architecture Consulting. In addition, we offer support services to allow customers to maximize availability and better leverage the value of their investments in Teradata solutions.
Hybrid Cloud Solutions
Our Hybrid Cloud Solutions deliver an end-to-end analytical ecosystem across a hybrid cloud architecture. Our offerings provide the ability to manage and access data across all deployment options, including:
|
•
|
Teradata Software Sold on Public Clouds
for the segment in the market that wants to purchase Teradata software and deploy it in the public cloud of their choice.
|
|
•
|
Teradata Managed Cloud Solutions
for the market segment looking for a fully managed service. Our Managed Cloud solutions make it easy for customers; by allowing them to focus on their business while our skilled data scientists and data management experts manage the customers' analytical ecosystem for them.
|
|
•
|
Hybrid Cloud Solutions
blending both on-premises and cloud environments. We expect the majority of companies to deploy hybrid cloud architectures.
|
Our core Teradata database remains a key component within Hybrid Cloud Solutions-it is a critical element in delivering our best-in-class analytics at scale. It provides the foundation for our unique ability to support and manage a wide range of mixed workloads and analytic data functions. Another key component is our Teradata Intelliflex™ Platform, which is our next-generation massively parallel processing ("MPP") architecture. Its fabric-based structure provides multi-dimensional scalability, enabling companies to add processing power and storage
6
capacity independently to meet their current and changing business requirements. A key technology in Intelliflex is the use of hybrid storage that combines Solid State Drive ("SSD") and Hard Disk Drive ("HDD") technologies to optimize performance while appropriately managing costs. Teradata IntelliFlex brings the agile and flexible growth benefits of our cloud offerings to the on-premises environment for our customers.
Business Analytics Solutions
Through our Business Analytics Solutions, we provide a
consultative approach to identify and deliver value to business buyers supported by analytic business consulting, data science, and repeatable intellectual property ("IP"). Our Business Analytics Solutions include:
|
•
|
Analytic Business Consulting
to innovate with our customers on large, complex problems to deliver high-impact business outcomes.
|
Our business consultants work with customers to discover insights in high-impact areas where we can deliver positive business outcomes. In some cases, we work with customers in areas where we already have experience and assets to leverage, and can accelerate their time to value through our proven methods, IP, and technologies. In other cases, we work with customers to identify and solve new challenges, while capturing new assets. We utilize our global best practices including Business Value Frameworks and our Rapid Analytic Consulting Engagement ("RACE") agile methodology.
|
•
|
IP Capture and Management
so solutions built for our customers
are developed once, and then systematically leveraged
,
to support future customers
. This approach is designed to provide rapid return on investment for customers.
|
Ecosystem Architecture Consulting
Our Ecosystem Architecture Consulting helps customers build an optimized analytical ecosystem independent of technology, leveraging Teradata, open source and other commercial solutions. Here, our consultants guide chief information officers and their teams in creating the optimal analytical ecosystem for our customers, based on our collective understanding of enterprise-grade scaled analytics, data warehousing, and the open source ecosystem.
Support Services
Our customer services offerings include both proactive and reactive services, including installation, maintenance, monitoring, back-up, and recovery services to allow customers to maximize availability and better leverage the value of their investments in Teradata solutions. They assist customers 24x7x365 for both on-site and remote support. Our customer services team is highly experienced and provides a single point of contact and delivery for the deployment, support and ongoing management of Teradata solutions around the world.
Partners, Marketing and Distribution Channels
Strategic Partnerships.
We seek to leverage our sales and marketing reach by partnering with leading global and regional systems integrators, independent software vendors, Hadoop distributors, and consultants, which we believe complement our analytics data platforms.
|
•
|
Alliance Partners
-Strategic partnerships are a key factor in our ability to leverage the value and expand the scope of our analytic solutions in the marketplace. Our partner program is focused on working collaboratively with independent software vendors in several areas, including tools, data and application integration solutions, data mining, analytics, business intelligence, specific analytic and industry solutions. Our goal is to provide choices to our customers with partner offerings that are optimized and certified with our solutions, and fit within the customer’s analytic environment.
|
|
•
|
Systems Integrators
-We also work with a range of systems integrators and consultants that engage in the design, implementation and integration of analytic solutions and analytic applications for our joint clients.
|
7
Our strategic partnerships with select global consulting and systems integration firms provide broad industry and technology expertise in the design of business solutions that leverage Teradata technology to enable enterprise analytics. Our strategic global consulting and systems integration partners include Accenture Limited, Capgemini Group, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Deloitte LLP, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), and Wipro Limited.
Sales and Marketing.
We primarily sell and market our solutions and services through a direct sales force, and are aligning our sales teams to best address the 500 largest analytic opportunities globally. We are applying differential resourcing to ensure that our sales and marketing investments are aligned with the customers’ long-term value to Teradata. We have approximately 80% of our employees in customer-facing and/or revenue driving roles (including sales, consulting and customer service, and product engineering).
We support our sales force with marketing and training programs which are designed to:
|
•
|
grow awareness, highlighting our technology leadership and differentiation, and our consulting expertise in the market,
|
|
•
|
create demand for our products and services,
|
|
•
|
educate the sales force to build skills and knowledge, as well as
|
|
•
|
provide a robust set of tools for use by our direct sales force.
|
We employ a broad range of marketing strategies including programs to inform and educate customers and prospects, the media, industry analysts, academics and other third-party influencers. These strategies include targeted, account-based marketing, our global website, webinars, physical and virtual trade shows and conferences, public and media relations, social media, and an extensive customer reference program.
Sources of Materials.
Our hardware components are assembled and configured by Flextronics International Ltd. (“Flextronics”). Our platform line is designed to leverage the components from industry leaders. Our data storage devices and memory components utilize industry-standard technologies, but are selected and configured to work optimally with our software and hardware platform. Flextronics also procures a wide variety of components used in the assembly process on our behalf. Although many of these components are available from multiple sources, Teradata utilizes preferred supplier relationships to better ensure more consistent quality, cost and delivery. Typically, these preferred suppliers maintain alternative processes and/or facilities to ensure business continuity of supply. Given our strategy to outsource product assembly activities to Flextronics and to source certain components from single suppliers, a disruption in production at Flextronics or at a supplier, or a global shortage of components, could impact the timing or profitability of customer shipments.
Competition
. We compete in a large and growing market that is attractive to both legacy and new competitors. Our competition includes new analytics services companies, cloud vendors and open source providers, as well as large traditional competitors, such as IBM and Oracle Corporation ("Oracle"). We believe our focus on business outcomes and proven success will enable us to successfully compete and win with the largest analytic opportunities in the market. We believe our proven architecture for both structured and unstructured data, integrated solutions with high-performing and scalable technology, flexible deployment options in the cloud and on-premises, deep and broad consulting and support services capabilities, strong customer relationships, and our successful track record will collectively enable us to continue to compete successfully. We also compete successfully in the marketplace by offering our ecosystem architecture consulting to help customers bring together our leading software, hardware and related services with open source offerings. For more information, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Competitors take different technical and integration approaches to addressing data analytic needs, and therefore they often recommend a different architecture than we do. We believe that our customers recognize the advantages of our technologies and our approach as described above.
Key factors used to evaluate competitors in these markets include: data analytics experience; business outcome delivery; hybrid cloud offerings and experience; customer references; technology leadership; product quality; performance, scalability, availability and manageability; support and consulting services capabilities; management
8
of technologies in a complex analytical ecosystem; industry knowledge; and total cost of ownership. We believe we have a competitive advantage in providing complete, integrated, and optimized analytic data platforms and analytic
services that address customers’ business, technical and architecture requirements. Our differentiation is especially strong with customers that have mission critical, complex, large scale environments and requirements.
Many companies participate in adjacent areas of the analytics market, such as enterprise analytic and business intelligence application software. The status of our business relationships with these companies can influence our ability to compete. Our products also complement offerings of some of our competitors, with whom we have formed partnerships to work with their business intelligence and application software businesses. Examples of these companies include both IBM and Oracle, due to their acquisitions of other business intelligence and consulting companies in recent years.
Seasonality.
Historically our sales are seasonal, in line with capital spending patterns of our customers, with lower revenue typically in the first quarter and higher revenue generally in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Such seasonality causes our working capital cash flow requirements to vary from quarter to quarter depending on the variability in the volume, timing and mix of product sales. Typically, cash provided by operating activities is higher in the first half of the year due to the higher receivable balances at December 31 and the increase in deferred revenue resulting from the timing of annual renewals of our maintenance support agreements. In addition, revenue in the third month of each quarter has historically been significantly higher than in the first and second months. These factors, among others as more fully described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, elsewhere in this Annual Report, make forecasting more difficult and may adversely affect our ability to accurately predict financial results.
Research and Development ("R&D").
We remain focused on designing and developing Hybrid Cloud Solutions that anticipate our customers' evolving technological and delivery needs. As we seek improvements in our products and services, we also consider our customers' current needs as we design our new technology so that new generations of the Teradata database software and platform technology are compatible with prior generations of our technology. We believe our extensive R&D workforce is one of our core strengths. The global R&D team is located in multiple facilities around the world to take advantage of global engineering talent. We anticipate that we will continue to have significant R&D expenditures, which may include complementary strategic acquisitions, in order to help support the flow of innovative, high-quality products, cloud-based offerings, services and applications, which is vital to our leading competitive position. For information regarding the accounting and costs included in R&D activities see “Note 1-Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Intellectual Property and Technology.
The Company owns 702 patents in the U.S. and 38 patents in foreign countries. The foreign patents are generally counterparts of the Company’s U.S. patents. Many of the patents that we own are licensed to others, and we are licensed to use certain patents owned by others. While our portfolio of patents and patent applications in aggregate is of significant value to our Company, we do not believe that any particular individual patent is by itself of material importance to our business as a whole.
In addition, the Company owns copyrights and trade secrets in its vast code base which makes up all of the Teradata software products including analytic data platforms and analytic applications. Teradata’s software products reflect the investment of hundreds of person-years of development work.
The source code versions of our products are protected as trade secrets and, in all major markets, as unpublished copyright works. We also protect our rights in all of our software products and related intellectual property; however, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful. The Company owns the Teradata
®
and Aster
®
trademarks, which are registered in the U.S. and in many foreign countries, as well as other trade names, service marks, and trademarks.
Employees.
As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately 10,093 employees globally. We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled and experienced personnel.
Properties and Facilities.
Our corporate headquarters is located in Dayton, Ohio, although our Johns Creek (Atlanta), Georgia; and Rancho Bernardo (San Diego), California facilities are also primary locations (within the
9
U.S.). As of
December 31, 2016
, we operated 114 facilities in 45 countries throughout the world. We own our Rancho Bernardo research and development complex, while all of our other facilities are leased.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The following table and biographies sets forth information as of
February 27, 2017
regarding the individuals who are serving as our executive officers.
Victor Lund.
Victor Lund has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Teradata since May 2016 and has served on the Company’s Board of Directors since 2007. Mr. Lund also served as chair of its Audit Committee from 2007 until May 2016. Previously, Mr. Lund was the non-executive chairman of the board of DemandTec, Inc., a publicly-held, on-demand applications company, from December 2006 until February 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Lund was non-executive chairman of the board of Mariner Health Care, Inc., a long-term health care services company, from 2002 to 2004, and he was vice chairman of Albertson’s, Inc. from 1999 to 2002. He was also chairman of the board of American Stores Company from 1995 until 1999 and its chief executive officer from 1992 until 1999. During his 22-year career with American Stores, Mr. Lund also held many operating executive positions. He also serves as a director of Service Corporation International and has served on a number of publicly-traded company boards, including Del Monte Foods Company and Delta Airlines.
John Dinning.
John Dinning is the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer with responsibility for leading strategy and marketing for the Company. He has served in this role since July 2016. Prior to that time, during 2016, he led the Company’s business transformation strategy and direction as its Chief Transformation Officer, and continues to oversee the action plans to move the organization forward. From 2012 to 2016, he led the Company’s data and analytics product management and product marketing functions, adding responsibility for cloud operations in June 2015. In his previous role as Vice President of Corporate Development, from 2007 to 2012, Mr. Dinning was responsible for Teradata’s overall corporate strategy and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Horizontal Solutions and Global Alliances from 2005 to 2007, which included the marketing and business development around Teradata’s customer management, finance and performance management, and demand and supply chain solutions, as well as, leadership of Teradata’s global alliances organization. Mr. Dinning joined Teradata in 2000 as a result of the acquisition of campaign management start-up Ceres Integration Solutions where he was responsible for marketing, product management, and software quality engineering.
Dan Harrington.
Dan Harrington is the Executive Vice President, Consulting and Support Services, and has served as head of Teradata’s entire global services organization including both consulting and support services since 2012 with added responsibility for the international sales region on an interim basis from June 2015 until August 2016. Previously, Mr. Harrington served as Executive Vice President, Technology and Support Services of Teradata from 2007 to 2012. He served as Vice President, Customer Services, Teradata Division of NCR, from 2005 until 2007. From 1999 to 2004, he was Vice President, Northern Europe, Teradata Division with responsibility for Europe sales. Mr. Harrington joined NCR in 1985 and held a number of positions of increasing responsibility in the areas of sales, marketing and product management before he joined Teradata.
Laura Nyquist
.
Laura Nyquist is the General Counsel and Secretary of Teradata and has served in this role since joining Teradata in 2007. From May 2016 until October 2016, Ms. Nyquist also served as the Company’s Interim Chief Human Resource Officer. Prior to joining Teradata, Ms. Nyquist held a number of senior management roles at NCR after joining that company in 1986, including Deputy General Counsel and Chief Counsel, Business Counsel
10
Group from 2006 to 2007, Chief Counsel, Financial Solutions Division from 2004 to 2006, and Vice President, Corporate Affairs, and Secretary to the NCR Board of Directors from 1999 to 2004.
Oliver Ratzesberger.
Oliver Ratzesberger serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer of Teradata with responsibility for the research and development of the Company’s data and analytics solutions. Previously, from June 2015 to August 2016, he was President, Teradata Labs and, from 2013 to June 2015, led the software teams for Teradata Labs. Before joining Teradata in 2013, he served as Vice President, Information Analytics and Innovation at Sears Holdings Corporation from 2011 until 2013. Prior to that, he was at eBay Inc., from 2004 until 2011, where he was responsible for its data warehouse and big data platforms as its Senior Director, Analytics Platform. Before joining eBay, Mr. Ratzesberger worked for startups in software development and information technology, and from 1996 to 2004, he held various positions in data warehousing and professional services for NCR.
Stephen Scheppmann.
Stephen Scheppmann has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Teradata since September 2007. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Per-Se Technologies, Inc., a leading provider of administrative healthcare industry services, from 2006 until 2007, following the completion of that company’s acquisition. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. Scheppmann served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for NOVA Information Systems, Inc., and, from 1988 to 2000, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Larson-Juhl, Inc. From January 2006 until June 2012, Mr. Scheppmann served as a member of the Board of Directors of eResearch Technology, Inc. and as chairman of its Audit Committee from April 2006 until June 2012.
Suzanne Zoumaras.
Suzanne Zoumaras is Teradata’s Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer and has served in this role since joining Teradata in October 2016. Ms. Zoumaras is responsible for the company’s talent strategies and programs, including recruiting, compensation, benefits, equity programs, engagement and retention, and employee relations. Most recently, from 2015 until its sale in May 2016, she served as Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources at Atmel Corporation, a $1.2 billion, San Jose-based public company and a leader in the design and manufacture of semiconductors at the center of the Internet of Things. Prior to that, from 2007 to 2015, Ms. Zoumaras was the Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources, at Entropic Communications, Inc., a fabless semiconductor company that designs, develops and markets semiconductor solutions.
There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers or directors of Teradata.
There are no contractual obligations regarding the election of our executive officers or directors.
Information.
Teradata makes available through its website, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to such reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These reports and other information are also available, free of charge, at
www.sec.gov
. Alternatively, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Teradata will furnish, without charge to a security holder upon written request, the Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Teradata will furnish the Code of Conduct and any other exhibit at cost (the Code of Conduct is also available through Teradata’s website at http://www.teradata.com/code-of-conduct/). Document requests are available by calling or writing to:
Teradata - Shareholder Relations
10000 Innovation Drive
Dayton, OH 45342
Phone: 937-242-4878
Website: http://www.teradata.com
11
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report. Based on the information currently known to us, we believe that the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting our company in each of these categories of risks. However, the risks and uncertainties our company faces are not limited to those set forth in the risk factors described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.
In addition, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
The failure to realize the anticipated benefits of our business transformation plan and execution of our new strategy - including transition to new business focus areas and delivery models, sales structures, talent management restructuring, and cost rationalization initiatives could adversely impact our business and financial results.
The successful implementation of our business transformation plan to evolve with the market and expand our market opportunity presents significant organizational and infrastructure challenges. As a result, we may not be able to implement and realize the anticipated benefits from our plan. Events and circumstances, such as financial or unforeseen difficulties, delays and unexpected costs, may occur that could result in our not realizing desired outcomes. Any failure to implement the plan in accordance with our expectations could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Even if the anticipated benefits and savings are substantially realized, there may be consequences, internal control issues, or business impacts that were not expected. Additionally, as a result of our restructuring efforts in connection with our business transformation plan, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge or loss of efficiency during transitional periods. Reorganization and restructuring can require a significant amount of management and other employees' time and focus, which may divert attention from operating activities and growing our business. If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of these activities, it could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, the Company exits businesses or attempts to sell assets that are no longer central to its strategic objectives, such as the marketing applications business which was sold on July 1, 2016. Any such disposition or attempted disposition is subject to risks, including risks related to the terms and timing of such disposition, risks related to obtaining necessary government or regulatory approvals, risks related to retained liabilities not subject to the company’s control, and risks related to the need to provide transition services to the disposed business, which may result in the diversion of resources and focus.
As part of our transformation strategy, the Company will release new offerings and employ new product and services delivery methods, such as software-only, software as a service, and cloud offerings. It is uncertain whether these strategies will prove successful or whether we will be able to develop the necessary business models, infrastructure and systems to support the business. This includes having or hiring the right talent to execute our business strategy. Market acceptance of new product and service offerings will be dependent in part on our ability to include functionality and usability that address customer requirements, and optimally price our products and services to meet customer demand and cover our costs. Our go-to-market strategy also must adjust to customers' changing buying preferences and our new products and delivery options, and there can be no assurance that our new go-to-market plans will adequately and completely address such preferences. New product and services offerings may increase our risk of liability and cause us to incur significant technical, legal or other costs. For example, with our cloud-based offerings, market acceptance is affected by a variety of factors, including information security, reliability, performance, the sufficiency of technological infrastructure to support our products and services in certain geographies, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage its data and access this data once a contract has expired, and consumer concerns regarding data privacy and the enactment of laws or
12
regulations that restrict our ability to provide such services to customers. If we are unable to respond to these threats, our business could be harmed.
Economic Pressures and Uncertainty-Our business is affected by the global economies in which we operate and the economic climate of the industries we serve.
Our business and results of operations are affected by international, national and regional economic conditions. In particular, the IT industry in which we operate is susceptible to significant changes in the strength of the economy and the financial health of companies and governmental entities that make capital commitments for new technologies. Since mid-2012, we have seen a shift in the market and in customers’ buying patterns, with respect to large capital investments and related services. Accordingly, downturns or uncertainty in the global or regional economies in which we operate or certain economic sectors (such as retail, manufacturing, financial services or government) may adversely impact our business. For example, adverse changes to the economy could impact the timing of purchases by our current and potential customers or the ability of our customers to fulfill their obligations to us. In addition, decreased or more closely scrutinized capital spending in our customers’ businesses and in the industries we also serve may adversely impact our business. Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. Accordingly, global economic and market conditions may cause material impacts on our results of operations, prospects and financial condition. The Company’s success in periods of economic uncertainty is also dependent, in part, on our ability to reduce costs in response to changes in demand and other activity.
Competition-The IT industry is intensely competitive and evolving, and competitive pressures could adversely affect our pricing practices or demand for our products and services.
We operate in the intensely competitive IT industry, which is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and models for consuming and delivering business and IT services, frequent new product introductions, and price and cost reductions. In general, as a participant in the analytic data solutions market, we face:
|
•
|
Changes in customer IT spending preferences and other shifts in market demands, which drive changes in the Company's competition;
|
|
•
|
Continued pressure on price/performance for analytic data platform solutions due to constant technology improvements in processor capacity and speed;
|
|
•
|
Changes in pricing, marketing and product strategies, such as potential aggressive price discounting and the use of different pricing models by our competitors or other factors;
|
|
•
|
Rapid changes in computing technology and capabilities that challenge our ability to maintain differentiation at the lower range of business intelligence analytic functions;
|
|
•
|
New and emerging analytic data technologies, competitors, and business models;
|
|
•
|
Continued emergence of open source software that often attempts to rival current technology offerings at a much lower cost despite its limited functionality;
|
|
•
|
Rapid changes in product delivery models, such as on-premises solutions versus cloud solutions;
|
|
•
|
Changing competitive requirements and deliverables in developing and emerging markets; and
|
|
•
|
Continuing trend toward consolidation of companies which could adversely affect our ability to compete, including if our key partners merge or partner with our competitors.
|
To compete successfully in this environment, we must rapidly and continually design, develop and market solutions and related products and services that are valued in the marketplace. To do this, we must react on a timely basis to shifts in market demands. Our market position depends on our ability to continually improve the price/performance of our solutions, while maintaining efficient operations to sustain our competitive operating margins. We must also maintain the quality of our products and services throughout these shifts in market demand. If we are unable to react quickly when and as needed to improve the value of our product offerings our operating results could be negatively impacted.
Our competitors include certain larger companies, such as IBM and Oracle, which are well-capitalized companies with widespread distribution, brand recognition and penetration of platforms and service offerings. The significant purchasing and market power of these larger competitors, which have greater financial resources than we do, could
13
allow them to surpass our market penetration and marketing efforts to promote and sell their products and services. In addition, many other companies participate in specific areas of our business, such as enterprise applications, analytic data platforms and business intelligence software. In some cases we may partner with a company in one area of our business and compete with them in another. The status of our business relationships with these companies can influence our ability to compete for analytic data solutions opportunities in such areas. We also expect additional competition from both established and emerging companies. Failure to compete successfully with new or existing competitors in these and other areas could have a material adverse impact on our ability to generate additional revenues or sustain existing revenue levels.
Analytic Data Solutions Market-If the overall analytic data solutions market declines or does not grow, we may sell fewer products and services, and our business may not be able to sustain and/or grow its current level of operations.
As the market trends toward more limited IT spending, there could be fewer customer transactions, or smaller transactions, or customers delaying investments in our products and services. In the past, we have seen periodic breaks in the buying patterns from some of our larger customers, which indicate a level of maturation of their current data warehouse implementation or a shifting of IT priorities when these customers are still leveraging the investments they have made in their core data warehousing infrastructures during past years. In addition, reduced prices and improvements in analytic data solutions may increase pressure on our product revenues and margins, as well as on the annuity streams we receive from our maintenance business. If the growth rates for the analytic data solutions market decline for any reason, there could be a decrease in demand for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Renewal Rates and Support Services-If our existing customers fail to renew their support agreements, if customers do not license updated software products on terms favorable to us, or if customers do not renew their subscription license arrangements with us, our revenues could be adversely affected.
We currently derive a significant portion of our overall revenues from maintenance services and unspecified when-and-if-available upgrades, and we depend on our installed customer base for future revenue from maintenance services and upgrades to updated products. The terms of our standard maintenance services and software upgrade arrangements generally provide for the payment of license fees and prepayment of first-year support fees and are generally renewable on an annual basis. The IT industry generally has been experiencing increasing pricing pressure from customers when purchasing or renewing support agreements. Mergers and acquisitions in certain industries that we serve could result in a reduction of the software and hardware being serviced and put pressure on our maintenance terms with customers who have merged. Given this environment, there can be no assurance that our current customers will renew their maintenance agreements or agree to the same terms when they renew, which could result in our reducing or losing maintenance fees.
If our existing customers fail to renew their maintenance agreements, or if we are unable to generate additional maintenance fees through the license of updated products to existing or new customers, our business and future operating results could be adversely affected.
Replacements of older Teradata systems often result in less hardware maintenance revenue since Teradata’s newer hardware is designed to be more powerful, use less energy and require less floor space. As a result, less hardware is needed for the same workload, and therefore less maintenance may be required on the newer generation system. However, it is been common that when a customer replaces an older platform, they often have also expanded the size and scope of their Teradata system, resulting in an increase in maintenance revenue, though not at the same rate of increase as product revenue.
Additionally, Teradata’s solution offerings have been expanded to include subscription licenses, hosting arrangements and software as a service, which can change the timing of when revenues are recognized. Additionally, future revenue streams could be adversely affected if customers do not renew their subscription licenses, hosting arrangements or software as a service arrangements.
14
Operating Result Fluctuations-Our financial results are subject to fluctuations caused by many factors that could result in our failing to achieve anticipated financial results.
Our quarterly and annual financial results have varied in the past and are likely to continue to vary in the future due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In particular, if transactions that we expect to close by the end of a quarter are not closed until a later date, our revenue and/or net income for that quarter could be substantially below expectations, especially given the large size of our transactions. These and any one or more of the factors listed below or other factors could cause us not to achieve our revenue or profitability expectations. The resulting failure to meet market expectations could cause a decrease in our stock price. These factors include the risks discussed elsewhere in this section and the following:
|
•
|
Downturns in our customers’ businesses, in the domestic economy or in international economies where our customers do substantial business;
|
|
•
|
Changes in demand for our products and services, including changes in growth rates in the analytic data solutions market;
|
|
•
|
The size, timing and contractual terms of large orders for our products and services, which may impact in particular our quarterly operating results (either positively or negatively);
|
|
•
|
Possible delays in our ability to recognize revenue as the result of contract terms;
|
|
•
|
The budgeting cycles of our customers and potential customers;
|
|
•
|
Changes in pricing policies resulting from competitive pressures, such as aggressive price discounting by our competitors, new pricing strategies, or other factors;
|
|
•
|
Changes in how customers prefer to purchase analytical solutions;
|
|
•
|
Our ability to develop and introduce on a timely basis new or enhanced versions of our products and services;
|
|
•
|
Changes in the mix of pre-tax earnings attributable to domestic versus international sales;
|
|
•
|
Seasonal fluctuations in buying patterns;
|
|
•
|
Future acquisitions and divestitures of technologies, products and businesses;
|
|
•
|
Unexpected needs for capital expenditures or other unanticipated expenses; and
|
|
•
|
Changes in certain assumptions, estimates and judgments of management (which are required in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements) that could affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs, expenses and the related disclosure of contingent liabilities.
|
Acquisitions and Alliances-Our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions and effectively manage acquisitions may be an important element of future growth.
We are continually evaluating the most effective ways to extend Teradata’s core technology and expand our family of compatible analytic platforms and solutions to address multiple market segments and solution offerings. From time to time, this includes acquisitions, equity investments or joint ventures. Such transactions entail various risks, including risks associated with:
|
•
|
Assimilating and integrating different business operations, corporate cultures, personnel, infrastructure and technologies or products acquired or licensed;
|
|
•
|
Retaining key employees and maintaining relationships with employees, customers, clients or suppliers of the acquired companies,
|
|
•
|
Recurring revenue of the acquired company may decline or fail to be renewed;
|
|
•
|
The potential for unknown liabilities, as well as undetected internal control, compliance or quality issues within the acquired or combined business or additional costs not anticipated at the time of acquisition;
|
|
•
|
Disruptions of our ongoing business or inability to successfully incorporate acquired products, services or technologies into our solutions and maintain quality;
|
|
•
|
Failure to achieve the projected synergies after integration of acquired companies or a decline in value of the acquired business and related impairments;
|
|
•
|
Funding acquisition activities, whether through the use of existing cash reserves, or through the use of debt, and the related impact on our liquidity and financial condition; and
|
|
•
|
Failure to realize all the economic benefits from these acquisitions, equity investments or joint ventures could result in an impairment of goodwill, intangible assets or other assets, which could result in a significant adverse impact to our results of operations.
|
15
Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of acquisitions and related integration activities, as well as other strategic growth transactions, and there is a risk that our financial results may be adversely affected.
Changing Tax Rates-A change in our effective tax rate can have a significant adverse impact on our business.
A number of factors may adversely impact our future effective tax rates, such as the jurisdictions in which our profits are determined to be earned and taxed; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; changes in available tax credits, especially surrounding tax credits in the U.S. for our research and development activities; and the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision, however, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material impact on our net income or financial condition.
Changes in U.S. or international tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate. For example, there have been proposals from Congress to change U.S. tax laws that would significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings, including limitations on the ability to defer U.S. taxation on earnings outside the U.S. until those earnings are repatriated to the U.S. In addition, unilateral or multi-jurisdictional actions by various tax authorities, including an increase in tax audit activity, to address “base erosion and profit shifting” by multinational companies could also have an adverse impact on our tax liabilities. Although we cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed legislation may pass, if enacted, it could have a material adverse impact on our tax expense and cash flows.
Sales Cycle Variations-Unanticipated delays or accelerations in our sales cycles make accurate estimation of our revenues difficult and could result in significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
The size and timing of large orders for our products and services varies considerably, which can impact results from quarter to quarter. The process we use to forecast sales and trends in our business relies heavily on estimates of closure on a transaction-specific basis. It is very difficult to predict sales in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time. Unanticipated delays or accelerations in our sales cycles make accurate estimation of our revenues difficult and could result in significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
The length of our sales cycle varies depending on a number of factors over which we may have little or no control, including the size and complexity of a potential transaction, the level of competition that we encounter in our selling activities and our current and potential customers’ internal budgeting and approval process, as well as overall macro-economic conditions. As a result of a generally long sales cycle, we may expend significant effort over a long period of time in an attempt to obtain an order, but ultimately not complete the sale, or the order ultimately received may be smaller than anticipated. Our revenue from different customers varies from quarter to quarter, and a customer with a large order in one quarter may generate significantly lower revenue in subsequent periods. Our results in any particular quarter have generally been dependent on the timing of a relatively small number of large transactions.
Due to resulting fluctuations, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue, margins, and operating results may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance.
In addition, the budgeting and IT capital spending cycles of our customers and potential customers make forecasting more difficult and may adversely affect our ability to accurately predict financial results. Spending may be particularly heavy in our fourth quarter because of large enterprise customers placing orders before the expiration of IT budgets tied to that calendar year.
Our operating expense budgets (including such categories as headcount, real estate, and technology resources) are based on projected annual and quarterly revenue levels and are generally incurred ratably throughout each quarter. Since our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, failure to generate projected revenues for a specified period could adversely impact our operating results, reducing net income or causing an operating loss for
16
that period. The deferral or non-occurrence of such sales revenues could adversely affect our operating results for that quarter and could negatively impact our business in future periods.
Seasonal Variability-Seasonal trends in sales of our products and services could adversely affect our quarterly operating results.
In general, we see fluctuations in buying patterns with lower revenue in the first quarter and higher revenue in the fourth quarter of each year. Such seasonality also causes our working capital cash flow requirements to vary from quarter to quarter depending on the variability in the volume, timing and mix of product sales. In addition, revenue in the third month of each quarter has historically been significantly higher than in the first and second months, which further impacts our ability to predict financial results accurately and enhances the enterprise risks inherent in our business. These and other factors make forecasting more difficult and may adversely affect our ability to predict financial results accurately.
Revenue Mix Variability-Our revenue is variable depending on the mix of products and services in any given period, and changes in the mix of products and services that we sell could materially adversely affect our operating results.
Our business model is based on our anticipated mix of products and services and the corresponding profit margins for such products and services. Unfavorable shifts in such mix could adversely impact our results of operations and require changes to our business model. Consulting services margins are generally lower than the other elements of our analytic data solutions. In addition, when we use third parties to supplement some consulting services we provide to customers, this generally results in lower margin rates. As a result, increases in consulting services revenues as a percentage of our total revenues may decrease overall margins.
We also realize different average selling prices and margins on different versions of our analytic data platforms, as well as certain components we re-sell as part of our solutions, and the mix of such hardware and software varies from quarter to quarter depending on customer requirements. In addition, changes in the price and performance of our analytic data platforms, particularly for certain hardware components, could negatively impact maintenance and support services revenues. Additionally, as we implement part of our business transformation plan and shift from upfront perpetual licenses to recurring over time models for both on-premises and cloud offerings, our revenue mix may be impacted.
Advancement of Our Solutions-The solutions we sell are advanced, and we need to rapidly and successfully develop and introduce new solutions in a competitive, demanding and rapidly changing environment.
To succeed in the intensely competitive IT industry, we must continually improve, refresh and expand our product and service offerings to include newer features, functionality, delivery options or solutions, and keep pace with price-to-performance gains in the IT industry. Shortened product life cycles due to customer demands and competitive pressures impact the pace at which we must introduce and implement new technology. This requires a high level of innovation by both our software developers and the suppliers of the third-party software components included in our systems. In addition, bringing new solutions to the market entails a costly and lengthy process, and requires us to accurately anticipate customer needs and technology trends. We must continue to respond to market demands, develop leading technologies and maintain leadership in analytic data solutions performance and scalability, or our business operations may be adversely affected.
We must also anticipate and respond to customer demands regarding the compatibility of our current and prior offerings. These demands could hinder the pace of introducing and implementing new technology. Our future results may be affected if our products cannot effectively interface and perform well with software products of other companies and with our customers’ existing IT infrastructures, or if we are unsuccessful in our efforts to enter into agreements allowing integration of third-party technology with the Teradata database and software platforms. Our efforts to develop the interoperability of our products may require significant investments of capital and employee resources. In addition, many of our principal products are used with products offered by third parties and, in the future, some vendors of non-Teradata products may become less willing to provide us with access to their products, technical information and marketing and sales support.
17
As a result of these and other factors, our ability to introduce new or improved solutions could be adversely impacted. There can be no assurance that our innovations will be profitable, and if we cannot successfully market and sell both existing and newly developed solutions, our business and operating results could be impacted. If we were to lose our significant technology advantage, our market share and growth could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to deliver products, features, and functionality as projected, we may be unable to meet our commitments to customers, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business.
Highly Advanced Products-Our products include highly advanced technology, and as we develop new products with greater capacity and performance capabilities, the increased difficulty and complexity associated with producing these products increases the likelihood of reliability, quality or operability problems.
Despite rigorous testing prior to their release and well-designed quality processes, our software and hardware products may contain undetected errors or security flaws, which may be found after the products are introduced and shipped. This risk is enhanced when products are first introduced or when new versions are released, as well as when we develop products with more advanced technology, since the increased difficulty and complexity associated with producing these products increases the likelihood of reliability, quality or operability problems. The correction and detection of errors may cause delays, lost revenues and incremental costs. Errors in our software products could also affect the ability of our products to work with other hardware or software products, could delay the development or release of new products or new versions of products, and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products. While we attempt to remedy errors that we believe would be considered critical by our customers prior to shipment, we may not be able to detect or remedy all such errors.
Our customers who rely on our solutions for business-critical applications are more sensitive to product errors, which could expose us to product liability, performance and warranty claims, as well as harm our reputation. These and other risks associated with new product and service offerings may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and future performance.
Product introductions and certain enhancements of existing products by us in future periods may also reduce demand for our existing products or could delay purchases by customers awaiting arrival of our new products. As new or enhanced products are introduced, we must successfully manage the transition from older products.
In the ordinary course of business, we continually evaluate opportunities for new product and service offerings, new markets and new geographic sectors, and development of such opportunities could entail certain business risks which could affect our financial condition. In addition, due to the complexity of many of our offerings, we may not be able to meet customer requirements with respect to consulting services without incurring costs greater than expected levels.
Information Systems and Security-A breach of security, disruption or failure of our information systems or those of our third party providers could adversely impact our business and financial results.
Our operations are dependent on our ability to protect our computer equipment and the information stored in our databases (and the computer equipment and database information of certain suppliers and other third parties) from damage by, among other things, earthquake, fire, natural disaster, cyber-attacks, power loss, telecommunications failures, unauthorized intrusions, malicious or unintended insider actions that cause loss of data or loss of systems, and other events. Despite our contingency planning, events of this nature may still result in system failures and other interruptions in our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We generally operate pursuant to a business-to-business model, such that our customers buy or lease hardware systems used in connection with our solutions and the customers deploy and operate those solutions. With respect to these kinds of customer on-premises solutions, the customer, directly or through its selected services providers, manages all aspects of the data controls and security with respect to any confidential, private or otherwise sensitive information stored or processed through these solutions, including any personally identifiable data or information - such as non-public data regarding our customers’ employees, customer’s customers, consumers, data subjects, individuals’ identities, individual financial accounts and health information regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. However, some of our services, including our software as a service or cloud offerings, may require us to deploy or operate solutions for our customers, directly or through the use of third
18
party services providers, either on-premises at customer-selected data center facilities or at third-party-hosted data center facilities selected by us. With respect to these kinds of cloud and non-traditional solution deployments and operations, we and such service providers have increased roles, responsibilities and risk exposures regarding some or all aspects of the data controls and security with respect to any confidential, private or otherwise sensitive information stored or processed through these solutions on our systems or those of selected third-party providers. If unauthorized access to or use of such information or systems occurs, despite data security measures and third party commitments to protect them, our results of operation, reputation, and relationships with our customers could be adversely impacted.
Additionally, experienced computer programmers, Nation State Sponsored Advanced Persistent Code (“NSSAPC”) attacks (from countries such as Iran, China and certain European Eastern Bloc countries) and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security or that of our third party providers and misappropriate or compromise our intellectual property or other confidential information or that of our customers, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. We have reason to believe that at least one attempted NSSAPC cyber-attack occurred against our systems in 2012, although we do not believe that it was successful or that there was any adverse impact to the Company in connection with the incident. Despite the fact that our preventative and remediation tools and actions may have mitigated or preempted this attack, we have since taken additional steps designed to further improve the security of our networks and computer systems; however, there can be no assurance that our defensive measures will be adequate to prevent them in the future. Also, like many other companies, our workstations are regularly subject to penetration attempts and malicious threats by hackers and, despite our defensive measures, we may not always be able to detect, mitigate or preempt them all. Breaches of security and disruptions of our information systems have not historically had a material impact on our results of operations and we have no reason to believe that attempts by hackers such as those described above have negatively impacted our IT infrastructure, operations, confidential information or intellectual property. However, there is risk that these types of activities will recur and persist, that one or more of them may be successful in the future, that one or more of them may have been or will be successful but not detected, prevented, remediated or mitigated by us, and the costs to us to eliminate, detect, prevent, remediate, mitigate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could adversely impact our future results of operations.
Reliance on Third Parties-Our future results depend in part on our relationships with key suppliers, strategic partners and other third parties.
Our development, marketing and distribution strategies depend in part on our ability to form strategic alliances with third parties that have complementary products, software, services and skills. Our strategic partners include consultants and system integrators, software and technology providers, and indirect channel distributors in certain countries. These relationships create risks beyond our control of our partners changing their business focus, entering into strategic alliance with other companies, being acquired by our competitors, failing to meet performance criteria or improperly using our confidential information. If we fail to maintain or expand our relationships with strategic partners, our business may be adversely affected.
Third-party vendors provide important elements to our solutions; if we do not maintain our relationships with these vendors or if these vendors cease to be going concerns, interruptions in the supply of our products may result. There are some components of our solutions that we purchase from single sources due to price, quality, technology or other reasons. For example, we have relied on Flextronics as a key single source contract manufacturer for our hardware systems for the last several years. In addition, we buy silicon computer chips and microprocessors from Intel Corporation, and storage disk systems from NetApp, Inc. Some components supplied by third parties may be critical to our solutions, and several of our suppliers may terminate their agreements with us without cause with 180 days notice. If we were unable to purchase necessary services, parts, components or products from a particular vendor and had to find an alternative supplier, our shipments and deliveries could be delayed. Also, disruption in our supply chain or the need to find alternative suppliers could impact the costs and/or timing associated with procuring necessary products, components and services. In either case, our operations could be adversely impacted. Similarly, our suppliers’ products and services have certain dependencies with respect to their own supply chain networks, and supply issues among our suppliers’ suppliers may also adversely impact our business.
19
In addition, smaller suppliers have operating risks that could impact our business. These risks could create product time delays, inventory and invoicing problems, staging delays, and other operational difficulties. We could also be impacted by their inability to provide high-quality products or services that conform to required specifications or contractual arrangements, which could negatively impact our business and operating results.
Reliance on the Intellectual Property of Third Parties-The loss of our rights to use software licensed to us by third parties could harm our business.
We have an active partner program that offers rights to sublicense third party software as part of a complete suite of solutions for our customers. This offering, as well as our reliance on third party software and licenses in our operating system software and business, creates risks that are not present when developing software in-house. For example, the viability, reliability and quality of such partners’ businesses, as well as their ability to fulfill their obligations to us, are factors that come into play and could adversely affect our financial condition. Our operations could also be impacted if we are forced to seek alternative technology, or technology for new solutions, that may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. Also, many of our offerings are complemented by technologies developed by others, and if we are unable to continue to obtain licenses for such technologies at competitive prices, our business could be impacted.
Intellectual Property-If we are unable to develop, preserve and protect our intellectual property assets, our operating results may be adversely affected.
As a technology company, our intellectual property portfolio is crucial to our continuing ability to be a leading analytic solutions provider. We strive to protect and enhance our proprietary intellectual property rights through patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as through technological safeguards. These efforts include protection of the products and application, diagnostic and other software we develop.
To the extent we are not successful our business could be materially adversely impacted. We may be unable to prevent third parties from using our technology without our authorization or independently developing technology that is similar to ours, particularly in those countries where the laws do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the U.S. (such as Iran, China and certain European Eastern Bloc countries who may use NSSAPC to advance their own industries). With respect to our pending patent applications, we may not be successful in securing patents for these claims, and our competitors may already have applied for patents that, once issued, will prevail over our patent rights or otherwise limit our ability to sell our products.
While we take steps to provide for confidentiality obligations of employees and third parties with whom we do business (including customers, suppliers and strategic partners), there is a risk that such parties will breach such obligations and jeopardize our intellectual property rights. Many customers have outsourced the administration and management of their data warehouses to third parties, including some of our competitors, who then have access to our confidential information. Although we have agreements in place to mitigate this risk, there can be no assurance that such protections will be sufficient. In addition, our ability to capture and re-use field-based developed intellectual property is important to future business opportunities and margins.
We are actively engaged in efforts to protect the value of our intellectual property and to prevent others from infringing our intellectual property rights. However, due to the complex and technical nature of such efforts and the potentially high stakes involved, such enforcement activity can be expensive and time consuming, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts.
Research and Development-We make significant investments in research and development and cannot assure that these investments will be profitable.
As part of our business strategy, we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts in order to maintain and advance our competitive position, including our initiatives to provide our offerings for cloud environments. However, we may not expect to receive significant revenues from these investments for several years, if at all. Research and development expenses represent a significant portion of our discretionary fixed costs. We believe these new technologies could significantly improve our products and services over the long-term. However, if we have invested inappropriately, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
20
Intellectual Property Infringement Claims by Third Parties-Claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property rights could harm our business and financial condition.
We have seen a trend towards aggressive enforcement of intellectual property rights as the functionality of products in our industry increasingly overlaps and the volume of issued software patents continues to grow. As a result, there is a risk that we could be subject to infringement claims which, regardless of their validity, could:
|
•
|
Be expensive, time consuming and divert management attention away from normal business operations;
|
|
•
|
Require us to pay monetary damages or enter into non-standard royalty and licensing agreements;
|
|
•
|
Require us to modify our product sales and development plans; or
|
|
•
|
Require us to satisfy indemnification obligations to our customers.
|
Regardless of whether these claims have any merit, they can be burdensome to defend or settle and can harm our business and reputation.
Open Source Software-The growing market acceptance of open source software and lower cost alternatives present challenges for our industry.
We have developed a version of the Teradata database software to operate on open source and alternative platforms and have incorporated other types of open source software into our products, allowing us to enhance certain solutions without incurring substantial additional research and development costs and expand our solution offerings. “Open source” software is made widely available by its authors and is licensed for a nominal fee or, in some cases, at no charge.
Open source licenses typically mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific ways with open source software, becomes subject to the open source license. We take steps to ensure that our proprietary software is not combined with, or does not incorporate, open source software in ways that would require our proprietary software to be subject to an open source license. However, few courts have interpreted the open source licenses, and the manner in which these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is therefore subject to uncertainty.
Additionally, there are certain open source software applications in the data analytics market that are being offered free of charge or for a nominal fee. Open source software offerings available in the marketplace such as Hadoop and others, can place additional competitive pressure on Teradata, even though we believe our offerings are unique and add value through software enhancements and services, and we may have difficulty in marketing our products to certain customers against available open source options.
International Operations-Generating substantial revenues from our multinational operations helps us to meet our strategic goals, but poses a number of risks.
In 2016, the percentage of our total revenues from outside of the U.S. was 46%. We believe that our geographic diversity may help to mitigate some risks associated with geographic concentrations of operations (
e.g.
, adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and deteriorating economic environments or business disruptions due to economic or political uncertainties). However, our ability to sell our solutions internationally is subject to the following risks, among others:
|
•
|
General economic and political conditions in each country that could adversely affect demand for our solutions in these markets;
|
|
•
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations that could result in lower demand for our products as well as generate currency translation losses;
|
|
•
|
The impact of civil and political unrest (relating to war, terrorist activity or other turmoil) on the economy or markets in general, or on our ability, or that of our suppliers, to meet commitments, which may occur in other countries where we have significant operations;
|
|
•
|
Changes to and compliance with a variety of local laws and regulations that may increase our cost of doing business in these markets or otherwise prevent us from effectively competing in these markets;
|
|
•
|
Cultural and management challenges with managing new and growing consulting services and engineering functions overseas in developing countries;
|
|
•
|
Difficulties in staffing and managing our foreign offices and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal and compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;
|
21
|
•
|
Longer payment cycles for sales in foreign countries and difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
•
|
Tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or investment;
|
|
•
|
Costs and delays associated with developing products in multiple languages;
|
|
•
|
The impact of catastrophic weather or other negative effects of climate change on our facilities, operations and/or workforce, as well as those of our customers, supply chains and distribution channels, throughout the world, particularly those in coastal areas; and
|
|
•
|
Changing competitive requirements and deliverables in developing and emerging markets.
|
Our products are subject to U.S. export controls and, when exported from the U.S., or re-exported to another country, must be authorized under applicable U.S. export regulations. Changes in our products or changes in export regulations may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our products throughout their global systems or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products to certain countries or customers altogether. Any change in export regulations or related legislation, shift in approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by these regulations could result in decreased use of our products by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customers with international operations.
Foreign Currency-Our revenue and operating income are subject to variability due to the effects of foreign currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar.
We have exposure to more than 30 functional currencies. The primary foreign currencies to which we are exposed include the euro, British pound, Japanese yen, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar and other Asian and South American currencies. A significant portion of our revenue and operating income is generated outside the U.S., and therefore our financial results may fluctuate due to the effects of such foreign currency fluctuations, which are difficult to predict. For example, in the event that one or more European countries were to replace the euro with another currency, Teradata sales into such countries, or into Europe generally, would likely be adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established. In addition, currency variations can affect margins on sales of our products in countries outside of the U.S. and margins on sales of products that include components obtained from suppliers located outside of the U.S.
Risks Relating to the Referendum of the United Kingdom’s Membership of the European Union
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (the “E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit”. As a result of the referendum, it is expected that the British government will begin negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s future relationship with the E.U. The announcement of Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. The strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies may adversely affect our operating results. The announcement of Brexit may also create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budgets on our products and services. Any of these effects of Brexit, among others, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Dependence on Key Employees-We depend on key employees and face competition in hiring and retaining qualified employees.
Our employees are critical to our success. Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain the services of senior management and key personnel in all functional areas of our company, including engineering and development, marketing and sales professionals, and consultants. Competition for highly skilled personnel in the IT industry is intense. No assurance can be made that key personnel will remain with us, and it may be difficult and costly to replace such employees. Our failure to hire, retain and replace our key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business operations.
Internal Controls-Inadequate internal control over financial reporting and accounting practices could lead to errors, which could adversely impact our ability to assure timely and accurate financial reporting.
22
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control objectives will be met. These inherent limitations include system errors, the potential for human error and unauthorized actions of employees or contractors, inadequacy of controls, temporary lapses in controls due to shortfalls in transition planning and oversight or resources, and other factors. Consequently, such controls may not prevent or detect misstatements in our reported financial results as required under SEC and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, which could increase our operating costs or impair our ability to operate our business. Controls may also become inadequate due to changes in circumstances, and it is necessary to replace, upgrade or modify our internal information systems from time to time. In addition, unforeseen risks may arise in connection with financial reporting systems due to inefficient business processes, business process reengineering projects, or changes in accounting standards.
If management is not successful in maintaining a strong internal control environment, material weaknesses could occur, causing investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could lead to a decline in our stock price, limit our ability to access the capital markets in the future, and require us to incur additional costs to improve our internal control systems and procedures.
Legal Contingencies and Regulatory Matters-Like other technology companies, we face uncertainties with regard to lawsuits, regulations and other related matters.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to proceedings, lawsuits, claims and other matters, including those that relate to the environment, health and safety, employee benefits, export compliance, intellectual property, and other regulatory compliance and general matters. See “Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report. Because such matters are subject to many uncertainties, their outcomes are not predictable. While we believe that amounts provided in our consolidated financial statements are currently adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities, there can be no assurances that the amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from such matters will not impact future operating results.
In addition, we are subject to diverse and complex laws and regulations, including those relating to corporate governance, public disclosure and reporting, which are rapidly changing and subject to many possible changes in the future. From time to time, we may conduct internal investigations in connection with our efforts to ensure compliance with such laws and regulations, the costs or results of which could impact our financial results. In addition, we may be subject to unexpected costs in connection with new public disclosure or other regulatory requirements that are issued from time to time. Laws and regulations impacting our customers, such as those relating to privacy, data protection and digital marketing, could also impact our future business. Because we do business in the government sector, we are generally subject to audits and investigations which could result in various civil or criminal fines, penalties or administrative sanctions, including debarment from future government business, which could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
In addition, our facilities and operations, including former facilities and former operations for which we may have liabilities, are subject to a wide range of environmental protection laws. There have not been any known actual material effects that compliance with environmental provisions has had upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company or its subsidiaries, and there are no material estimated capital expenditures for environmental remediation or liabilities planned. However, we do expect to incur some costs in connection with compliance with these matters and given the uncertainties inherent in such activities, there can be no assurances that the costs required to comply with applicable environmental laws will not adversely impact future operating results.
There is active enforcement and ongoing focus by the SEC and other governmental authorities on the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 (the “Bribery Act”) and similar anti-bribery, anti-corruption laws in other countries. Given the breadth and scope of our international operations, we may not be able to detect improper or unlawful conduct by our international partners and employees, despite our high ethics, governance and compliance standards, which could put the Company at risk regarding possible violations of such laws, including the FCPA or the Bribery Act.
Management time and resources are spent to understand and comply with changing laws, regulations and standards relating to such matters as corporate governance, accounting principles, public disclosure (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), SEC regulations, Basel III and the rules of the NYSE where our shares are listed. Although we
23
do not believe that recent regulatory and legal initiatives will result in significant changes to our internal practices or our operations, rapid changes in accounting standards, and federal securities laws and regulations, among others, may substantially increase costs to our organization, challenge our ability to timely comply with all of them and could have an impact on our future operating results.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and limit our financial flexibility.
The Company's indebtedness could:
|
•
|
expose us to interest rate risk since our indebtedness is at variable rates;
|
|
•
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
•
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing or refinancing at attractive rates;
|
|
•
|
require the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal of, and interest on, our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund our growth strategy, working capital, capital expenditures, share repurchases and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
•
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry; and
|
|
•
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt.
|
Further, our outstanding indebtedness is subject to financial and other covenants, which may be affected by changes in economic or business conditions or other events that are beyond our control. If we fail to comply with the covenants under any of our indebtedness, we may be in default under the loan, which may entitle the lenders to accelerate the debt obligations. In order to avoid defaulting on our indebtedness, we may be required to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, reducing or eliminating stock repurchases, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing all or part of our existing debt, or seeking additional equity capital, any of which may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, if at all.
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
|
Item 2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
As of December 31, 2016, Teradata operated 114 facilities in 45 countries consisting of approximately 1.5 million square feet throughout the world. Approximately 28% of this square footage is owned and the rest is leased. Within the total facility portfolio, Teradata operates 14 research and development facilities totaling approximately 600 thousand square feet, of which approximately 68% is owned. The remaining approximately 900 thousand square feet of space includes office, repair, warehouse and other miscellaneous sites, and is 100% leased. Teradata believes its facilities are suitable and adequate to meet its current needs. Teradata’s corporate headquarters is located in Dayton, Ohio.
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
Information regarding legal proceedings is included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report as part of “Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
Item 4.
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
N/A.
24
PART II
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Teradata common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TDC.” There were
approximately 59,638 registered holders of Teradata common stock as of February 9, 2017. The following table presents the high and low closing per share prices of Teradata common stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange during the calendar quarter indicated.
Teradata has not paid cash dividends and does not anticipate the payment of cash dividends to holders of Teradata common stock in the immediate future. The declaration of dividends in the future would be subject to the discretion of Teradata’s Board of Directors.
The information under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Part III Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is also incorporated by reference in this section.
25
The following graph compares the relative performance of Teradata stock, the Standard & Poor’s ("S&P") 500 Stock Index and the S&P Information Technology Index. This graph covers the five-year period from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Company/Index
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Teradata Corporation
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
S&P Information Technology Index
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
In each case, assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2011, and reinvestment of all dividends, if any.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases
For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, the Company executed purchases of approximately 3 million shares of its common stock at an average price per share of
$24.25
under the two share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors in 2008. The first program (the “dilution offset program”) authorizes the Company to repurchase Teradata common stock to the extent of cash received from the exercise of stock options and under the Teradata Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) to offset dilution from shares issued pursuant to these plans. On February 6, 2012, the board approved a new $300 million share repurchase authorization to replace a prior $300 million authorization under the Company’s second share repurchase program (the “general share repurchase program”), that was to expire on February 10, 2012. Since February 2012, Teradata’s Board of Directors has approved, in $300 million increments, additional share repurchase authorizations for a total of $2.0 billion under the Company’s general share repurchase program on each of the following dates: December 10, 2012, October 14, 2013, May 5, 2014, December 18, 2014, and May 4, 2015. An additional share repurchase authorization of $500 million was approved by the board in August 20, 2015. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company had $512 million of authorization remaining to repurchase outstanding shares of Teradata common stock under the general share repurchase program. Share repurchases made by the Company are reported on a trade date basis.
In addition to the share repurchase programs, Section 16 officers occasionally transfer vested shares of restricted stock to the Company at the current market price to cover their withholding taxes. For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, the total of these purchases was 30,411 shares at an average price of $25.74 per share.
26
The following table provides information relating to the Company’s repurchase of common stock for the year ended
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
Total
Number
of Shares Purchased
|
|
Average
Price
Paid
per Share
|
|
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Dilution
Offset Program
|
|
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
General
Share
Repurchase Program
|
|
Maximum
Dollar
Value
that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Dilution
Offset Program
|
|
Maximum
Dollar
Value
that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
General Share
Repurchase Program
|
|||||||||
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
First quarter total
|
2,003,600
|
|
|
$
|
23.38
|
|
|
103,600
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,929,458
|
|
|
$
|
528,496,830
|
|
|
Second quarter total
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
24.80
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,171,541
|
|
|
$
|
528,496,830
|
|
|
Third quarter total
|
307,978
|
|
|
$
|
24.89
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
157,978
|
|
|
$
|
9,490,535
|
|
|
$
|
524,554,570
|
|
|
October 2016
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,588,745
|
|
|
$
|
524,554,570
|
|
|
November 2016
|
187,100
|
|
|
$
|
26.97
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
187,100
|
|
|
$
|
11,516,583
|
|
|
$
|
519,508,404
|
|
|
December 2016
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,682,315
|
|
|
$
|
511,525,804
|
|
|
Fourth quarter total
|
487,100
|
|
|
$
|
26.75
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
487,100
|
|
|
$
|
12,682,315
|
|
|
$
|
511,525,804
|
|
|
2016 Full year total
|
3,398,678
|
|
|
$
|
24.25
|
|
|
853,600
|
|
|
2,545,078
|
|
|
$
|
12,682,315
|
|
|
$
|
511,525,804
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
December 31
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
In millions, except per share and employee amounts
|
2016
(1)
|
|
2015
(2)
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
|
$
|
2,692
|
|
|
$
|
2,665
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Income tax expense
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
2,527
|
|
|
$
|
3,132
|
|
|
$
|
3,096
|
|
|
$
|
3,066
|
|
|
Debt, including current portion
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
971
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
1,707
|
|
|
$
|
1,857
|
|
|
$
|
1,779
|
|
|
Number of employees
|
10,093
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|||||
(1)
Includes $76 million ($70 million after-tax) for impairment of goodwill and acquired intangi
bles
|
(2)
|
Includes $478 million ($457 million after-tax) for impairment of goodwill and acquired intangibles
|
27
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (“MD&A”)
|
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”). This Annual Report contains certain statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements contained in the MD&A are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in other sections of this Annual Report. See “Risk Factors” and “Forward-looking Statements.”
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Teradata is a global leader in analytic data solutions and related services. Our analytic data solutions comprise software, hardware, and related business consulting and support services for analytics across a company’s entire analytical ecosystem. We help customers access and manage data and extract business value and insight from their data. Our applications are designed to leverage data to help customers discover and exploit new insights such as:
|
•
|
determining and maximizing customer and product profitability,
|
|
•
|
more accurately forecasting consumer demand, and
|
|
•
|
creating more predictable and less costly supply chains.
|
Our consulting services allow customers to maximize use and obtain great value from their analytics investments. Our services include a broad range of offerings including consulting to help organizations design, optimize and manage their analytic and big data environments, either on-premises or in the cloud. Our value-added consulting services provide expertise in data architecture services, cloud ("software as a service", "analytics as a service"), private cloud, managed services, and related installation services. In addition to our consulting services we offer a comprehensive set of support services. We serve customers around the world across a broad set of industries, including communications, ecommerce, financial services, government, gaming, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing, media and entertainment, oil and gas, retail, travel and transportation, and utilities - with offerings ranging from small departmental implementations to many of the world’s largest analytic data platforms. To meet evolving trends in information management, we provide our offerings on-premises or in the cloud (as a service).
2016 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
As more fully discussed in later sections of this MD&A, the following are the financial highlights for
2016
:
|
•
|
Revenue decreased 8% in
2016
from
2015
to
$2,322 million
. The year-over-year revenue comparison was negatively impacted by 1 percentage point from foreign currency fluctuations and the sale of the marketing applications business in 2016.
|
|
•
|
Gross margin was
51.2%
in
2016
, up from
50.4%
in
2015
, which was largely due to improved deal mix and product mix.
|
|
•
|
Operating income was
$232 million
in
2016
, up from operating loss of
$(195) million
in
2015
. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to more significant impairments of goodwill and acquired intangibles in 2015 than 2016, as well as a decrease in operating expenses.
|
|
•
|
Net income of
$125 million
in
2016
versus a net loss of
$(214) million
in
2015
. Net income per diluted share was
$0.95
in
2016
compared to net loss per common share of
$(1.53)
in
2015
. Net income for
2016
includes a $70 million after-tax impairment loss for goodwill and acquired intangibles, approximately $47 million in after-tax impacts of acquisition-related transaction, integration and reorganization expenses, and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared to
$502 million
of such costs and expenses in
2015
.
|
28
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Teradata’s strategy is based around our core belief that analytics and data unleash the potential of great companies. We empower companies to achieve high-impact business outcomes through scalable analytics on an agile data foundation. Through our focus on leading with business outcomes and a consultative approach, our goal is to serve as a trusted advisor to both the business and technical leaders in our customers’ organizations. Our business analytics solutions are ideally suited for the world’s largest companies who have the most complex analytics requirements and the need to scale.
Our strategy is to provide a differentiated set of offerings to this target market through the following portfolio of solutions, including the following:
|
•
|
Hybrid Cloud
: leading technology and services to deliver an analytic ecosystem deployed in a hybrid cloud architecture, including offerings such as managed cloud, private cloud, public cloud, and on premises software and hardware.
|
|
•
|
Business Analytics Solutions
: deliver high-value business outcomes realized by engaging with business users through solution-based selling that leverages analytic consulting and repeatable analytical intellectual property ("IP");
|
|
•
|
Ecosystem Architecture Consulting
: best-in-class architecture consulting expertise to help customers build optimized analytical ecosystems independent of technology, leveraging both open source and commercial solutions; and
|
We deliver our solutions on-premises, via the cloud, and "as a service"; offering customers choice in how they deploy a Teradata analytics environment and leverage the power of our solutions. These flexible delivery options are designed to extend our market opportunity.
In support of our strategy, we plan to optimize our go-to-market and sales approach to improve effectiveness in demand creation and address new and expanded market opportunities, such as with our consultative business solutions and cloud offerings. We will continue investing in partnerships to increase the number of solutions available on Teradata platforms, maximize customer value, and increase our market coverage.
We believe that our more consultative, solution-selling approach and portfolio of offerings that support customers’ choice in procuring and deploying analytics will best position us to be our customers’ trusted advisor and partner of choice for architecting, implementing, and managing their analytic solutions.
In summary, our long-term strategic objectives are to:
|
•
|
deliver business outcomes for our customers through technology-enabled analytics at scale,
|
|
•
|
by focusing on companies with the largest analytic opportunities,
|
|
•
|
by offering market-leading hybrid cloud technology,
|
|
•
|
that is enabled by a world class go-to-market sales and support team,
|
|
•
|
with the ultimate goal of generating revenue, earnings, and cash flow growth.
|
FUTURE TRENDS
We believe that future demand for our analytic solutions will increase based on the growth of new, high volume data sources such as sensor and machine-generated data, and based on data and analytics enabled use cases in areas such as seismic/exploration, genomics and biological research, connected cars, and smart cities.
Analytic environments are becoming more complex to design and manage as there are increasing types of analytic tools and techniques, multiple data management systems both on-premises and in the cloud, commercial and open source technologies to be integrated, varying service level requirements, and the growth and volume of data. This
29
complexity drives the need for an overall architecture to manage such environments. Demand for value-added consulting and services is growing as customers seek help with evolving their analytic architectures, rapidly deploying their analytic architectural solutions, and increasingly look to purchase analytic capabilities “as a service".
Overall, analytics are growing in importance as global businesses seek new means to drive business value from the ever-increasing amounts and types of data. As a result, we expect that Teradata’s leadership status and investments in our strategic areas of focus will position us for future growth.
This growth, however, is not expected to be without its challenges from general economic conditions, competitive pressures, alternative technologies, and other risks and uncertainties. Over the past few years, we have seen a shift in the market that included a reduction in customers’ large capital investments in traditional data analytic systems and related services. Specifically, customers have been focusing investments in their analytical ecosystems on products which have lower average selling prices than traditional integrated data warehouse ("IDW") environments, and changing their buying behavior with decisions shifting from IT to business users who typically want operating expense purchasing options. As a result, our revenue has been impacted by our customers’ focus on less capital intensive options like cloud, subscription-based licenses, rental and usage-based models. In addition, an increasing percentage of our customers want to buy easy-to-use, vendor managed, on-line delivery “as-a-service” analytics rather than analytic systems. Currently, we believe that the greatest challenge for future revenue growth relates to our ability to adapt and respond to this market shift with respect to the way customers want to purchase and deploy analytic technologies.
Overall, we believe that the IDW will remain a critical part of companies’ analytical ecosystems and Teradata’s technology is highly differentiated with our ability to handle the concurrency and service level agreements of hundreds to thousands of mission-critical users and applications. Further, we believe the Company has the opportunity for continued revenue growth from both the expansion of our existing customers’ analytical ecosystems as well as the addition of new customers. Teradata has expanded our offerings as well as our pricing options to make it easier for customers to buy and expand with Teradata including flexible offerings including availability in the cloud and over time pricing programs.
There is risk that pricing and competitive pressures on our solutions could increase in the future as major customers evaluate and rationalize their analytics infrastructure, particularly to the extent that cost becomes the top focus and lower-cost/lower performing alternatives are more seriously and frequently considered. However, such alternatives generally do not enable companies to perform mission-critical, complex analytic workloads to address customer's needed business outcomes from large-scale analytics, discovery analytics, and data management such as those enabled by Teradata’s portfolio of offerings. As the market continues to evolve, we will be challenged to generate revenue growth shorter term as customers purchase in smaller deal sizes, and more of our customers shift from upfront perpetual licenses to over time models at a pace which is difficult to predict.
As described above, we are also transforming our go-to-market approach to better position Teradata with both business buyers and IT buyers, and to expand with our existing customers as well as add more customers. To meet this objective, we will focus on execution and monitoring our progress with respect to this evolution, as well as working to infuse talent into our organization with key skill sets to support our strategy. We continue to believe that analytics will remain a high priority for companies and longer term will drive growth for Teradata’s leading solutions. Moreover, we continue to be committed to new product development and achieving a positive yield from our research and development spending and resources, which are intended to drive future demand. In addition, we will continue to optimize our go-to-market structure to focus on the greatest analytic opportunities, and to manage our cost structure as we work to broaden our product and consulting services portfolios and market penetration.
As a portion of the Company’s operations and revenue occur outside the United States ("U.S."), and in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Based on currency rates as of January 31, 2017, Teradata is expecting one point of negative impact from currency translation on our full year projected revenue growth rate.
30
BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION
Teradata continues to advance in the execution of its business transformation plan to return the Company to profitable growth. As described above, we are strengthening our consultative approach to selling data analytics that enable high-impact business outcomes for our customers and extend our portfolio of hybrid cloud solutions. We are also realigning our go-to-market approach to improve sales effectiveness and achieve better financial results. We will continue to invest and prioritize initiatives that strengthen our ability to be our customers’ trusted advisor for data and analytics.
In addition, our broad-reaching transformation is intended to drive change across our Company, including in the following key areas:
|
•
|
Cloud - We plan to continue to expand our data warehouse offerings in the public cloud and in Teradata’s managed cloud environments. With our "Teradata Everywhere" initiative, we offer our customers greater flexibility and agility through the same Teradata database that we offer on premises, now in a managed cloud, public cloud, or private cloud environment. Teradata Everywhere is designed to speed time to value, save costs, and encourage analytics use throughout the organization. We are building new services for cloud migration as well as for design, implementation and management of cloud and hybrid cloud environments.
|
|
•
|
On-premises data warehouse - We have introduced methods to make it easier to buy, expand, and seamlessly upgrade data warehouses. We expect that our IntelliFlex platform architecture, released in early 2016, will provide more flexible configurations and seamless expansions of our customers’ IDW environments, and that the software-only version of our Teradata database will allow us to expand with both new and existing customers.
|
|
•
|
Analytical ecosystem - We are adding to our data load and integration software and service offerings capabilities that manage customers' analytical ecosystems with new products such as Teradata UnityTM, QueryGridTM, and ListenerTM. These offerings help connect and manage the customers' ecosystems to help manage and extract value from their data.
|
We expect the mix of our revenues to shift toward cloud, analytical ecosystem, and analytic consulting services over time, as these are faster growing markets, which we believe will help increase our recurring revenue over time.
Another element that is critical to Teradata's successful transformation plan is modifying our go-to-market efforts to a more consultative approach to better address the increasing relevance of business buyers and to help customers build analytical ecosystems that include our own technologies as well as open source and other commercial solutions. We have actions underway to adjust our go-to-market efforts to address these new approaches and to align with the way we believe that our customers want to buy data analytics solutions.
We have reviewed and rationalized the Company's expense structure and are now moving from a cost reduction initiative to a cost management approach as we invest for Teradata’s future, including investments to support our cloud-based initiatives, analytical solutions, realignment of our go-to-market approach, and modernizing our infrastructure.
One of Teradata’s key strategic initiatives is to enable analytics for companies by making it easier to buy and easier to grow from traditional on-premises deployments to hybrid cloud solutions. These hybrid solutions offer simplified and consistent approaches with operating expense alternatives in addition to traditional capital intensive outlays. This strategy should accelerate our move away from traditional, upfront revenue sales and deployment models to a model where revenue is recognized over time. As a result, the Company’s revenue could decline in the short-term as customers transition to these purchasing models. Therefore, Teradata is introducing additional financial and performance measures to allow for greater transparency regarding the progress we are making toward achieving our strategic objectives. These new financial and performance measures currently include the following:
|
•
|
TCORE Growth
- a measure of consumption of the Teradata database solution. It is based on the performance of a system as calculated by number of cores reduced by an input/output ("I/O") factor, recognizing that an I/O starved central processing unit ("CPU") will not provide optimum performance.
|
31
|
•
|
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)
- is the annual value at a point in time of all of our recurring contracts, including support, software upgrade rights, subscription licenses, rental and cloud.
|
|
•
|
Recurring Revenue as a % of Total Revenue
- revenue from all recurring contracts, including support, software upgrade rights, subscription licenses, rental and cloud divided by total Company revenue.
|
|
•
|
Business Consulting Revenue Growth
- revenue growth from our strategic service offerings around Analytics Consulting, Business Consulting, and Ecosystem Architecture consulting. Although the revenue from Business Consulting represents a small percent of total Company revenue, it is a leading indicator of future TCORE growth and measures our effectiveness of becoming a “Trusted Advisor” within our customers and targeted prospects.
|
RESULTS FROM OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 AND 2014
Revenue
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
38.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
|
Service revenue
|
1,433
|
|
|
61.7
|
%
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Total revenue decreased 8% in 2016 as compared to 2015. The revenue decrease included a 1% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuations. The revenue decline was primarily due to customers increasingly opting for subscription-based (term) licenses, rental of hardware, and cloud adoption. This has an impact on the amount of revenue that is booked upfront versus over the term of the contract. In addition, the sale of the marketing applications business, which generated $69 million in revenue in 2016 (before the sale on July 1, 2016) compared to $153 million in 2015, had a negative impact on total revenue of 3%. Product revenue decreased 16% in 2016 from 2015 primarily due to customers increasingly opting for our subscription-based purchase options. Service revenue decreased 3% in 2016 from 2015, with an underlying 6% decrease in consulting services revenue and 1% increase in maintenance services revenue compared to 2015. Services revenue declined primarily due to the sale of the marketing applications business on July 1, 2016 and foreign currency fluctuations, which had a 2% adverse impact on services revenue.
In 2015, total revenue decreased 7% as compared to 2014. The revenue decrease included a 5% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuations. The revenue decline was due primarily to constrained information technology budgets, extended sales cycles, and a reduction in large customer orders, as well as the impact currency translation had on reported revenue growth. Product revenue decreased 14% in 2015 from 2014 primarily due to a decrease in customers' large capital expenditures and foreign currency fluctuations, which had a 5% adverse impact on product revenue. Service revenue decreased 2% in 2015 from 2014, with an underlying 5% decrease in consulting services revenue and 1% increase in maintenance services revenue compared to 2014. Services revenue declined due to foreign currency fluctuations, which had a 6% adverse impact on services revenue.
Gross Margin
The Company often uses specific terms/definitions to describe variances in gross margin. The terms and definitions most often used are as follows:
|
•
|
Revenue Mix
- The proportion of products and services that generates the total revenue of the Company. Changes in revenue mix can have an impact on gross margin even if total revenue remains unchanged.
|
|
•
|
Services Mix
- The proportion of higher-margin maintenance revenue versus lower-margin consulting revenue that generates the total services revenue of the Company.
|
|
•
|
Product Mix
- The proportion of various products that generate the total product revenue of the Company. For example, a higher mix of IDW products versus departmental data mart, Aster, our Extreme Data
|
32
Appliance or Hadoop products would have a positive impact on product gross margins. This definition also includes the mix of Company sourced and third party products.
|
•
|
Deal Mix -
Refers to the type of transactions closed within the period and includes such transactions as capacity on demand (“COD”), floor sweeps versus capacity additions, enterprise license agreements ("ELA"), hardware versus software, and discounting (new customers versus existing customers, large customers versus smaller customers).
|
|
◦
|
COD
is a common offering used by Teradata and other information technology vendors that allows the customer to purchase extra capacity in the future, which is already delivered and integrated into their existing systems, typically within 12-18 months. COD enables customers to "activate" or add capacity quickly. Product cost is recognized upon delivery with no corresponding revenue. When customers activate the COD, we record and recognize the revenue associated with the added capacity and the gross margin is recovered.
|
|
◦
|
Floor sweeps
take place when an existing customer replaces their older Teradata platform with a new Teradata platform, which can result in a large revenue transaction, but typically also results in a higher mix of lower-margin hardware revenue versus higher-margin software revenue.
|
|
◦
|
ELA
transactions allow customers to purchase as much software as needed for current production use for a period of time in exchange for a fixed fee that is typically recognized as revenue upfront or as payments become due if the terms of the payments are extended. Additional capacity during the term results in lower-margin hardware revenue versus higher-margin software revenue.
|
Gross margin for the following years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Product gross margin
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
58.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
63.9
|
%
|
|
Service gross margin
|
651
|
|
|
45.4
|
%
|
|
659
|
|
|
44.7
|
%
|
|
695
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|||
|
Total gross margin
|
$
|
1,188
|
|
|
51.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
50.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,479
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
In 2016, product margin increased 2% points due to favorable deal and product mix. Service gross margin improved 1% points driven by the exiting of the marketing applications business which had a lower service margin rate than the Data and Analytics service rate.
In 2015, product margin declined 5.5% points due to deal mix (including a higher mix of hardware versus software deals as well as pricing programs that are intended to make it easier to buy Teradata), foreign currency, a lower mix of integrated data warehousing products and a reduction in product volume. Service gross margin declined 1.5% points due to investments in our big data consulting capabilities, the marketing applications business (prior to the decision to exit this business), and investments in our Teradata cloud capabilities.
33
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
664
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
212
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
228
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
206
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill, acquired intangibles and other assets
|
80
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
478
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|||
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,471
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
In 2016, selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expense decreased by $101 million or 13% compared to 2015. The decrease is
driven by the exit of the marketing applications business and cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by higher annual incentive payment accruals.
Research and development ("R&D") expenses decreased $16 million or 7% in 2016 due to the exit of the marketing applications business and cost reduction initiatives partially offset by additional spending for strategic initiatives including further investment in our managed and public cloud offerings, Teradata software-only and our Intelliflex platform.
In 2015, SG&A expense decreased by $5 million or 1% compared to 2014. The decrease is a result of the change in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by increased investments in demand creation resulting from our strategic investment initiatives. R&D expenses increased $22 million or 11% in 2015 due to additional investments in big data analytics, cloud and marketing applications, which included incremental expenses from acquisitions. The increase in R&D expense was also caused by a decrease in capitalized software of $7 million compared to 2014.
The Company recognized an impairment of goodwill of $57 million and acquired intangibles of $19 million in 2016 to adjust the marketing applications business, which was sold on July 1, 2016, to its fair value less cost to sell. In addition, the Company recorded a $4 million impairment charge related to the sale of its corporate plane. The Company recorded a goodwill impairment of $437 million and an impairment of acquired intangibles of $41 million in 2015, also related to the marketing applications business (see Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Other (Expense) Income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Interest income
|
7
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
|
Other
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
|
Total Other (Expense) Income, net
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
In
2016, other expense included a foreign exchange loss of $9 million related to the devaluation of the Egyptian pound. The increase in interest expense and interest income compared to 2015 was due to an increase in interest rates.
In
2015, other income primarily included a gain of $57 million from sale of equity investments. This was partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to an increase in debt. In 2014, other expense primarily included a loss of $9 million on an equity investment arising from an impairment of carrying value.
34
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate for the following years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|||
|
Effective Tax Rate
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
(48.6
|
)%
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
The 2016 effective tax rate was impacted by the $57 million of goodwill impairment charge recorded in the first quarter of 2016, all of which were treated as a permanent non-deductible tax item. In addition, a discrete tax charge of $22 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2016 for the tax impact of the sale of the marketing applications business, which occurred on July 1, 2016. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded $8 million of tax expense associated with the issuance of new U.S. Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 987 on December 7, 2016, which clarified how companies calculate foreign currency translation gains and losses for income tax purposes for branches whose accounting records are kept in a currency other than the currency of the company. Also in the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company elected to early adopt Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. As a result, the Company incurred a $5 million discrete tax expense associated with the net shortfall arising from 2016 equity compensation vestings and exercises.
The 2015 effective tax rate was impacted by the $437 million of goodwill impairment charges recorded for 2015, of which $414 million was treated as a permanent non-deductible tax item. This resulted in full-year income tax expense in 2015 of $70 million, on a pre-tax net loss of $(144) million, causing a negative tax rate of 48.6%. There were no material discrete tax items impacting the effective tax rate for full year 2014.
Revenue and Gross Margin by Operating Segment
Effective January 1, 2016, Teradata implemented an organizational change in which it now manages the Company's business under two geographic regions and the marketing applications division (prior to its sale on July 1, 2016); which are also the Company’s operating segments: (1) Americas Data and Analytics (North America and Latin America); (2) International Data and Analytics (Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Japan); and (3) Marketing Applications. Effective July 1, 2016, following the sale of the marketing applications business, Teradata is managing its business in two operating segments: (1) Americas region (North America and Latin America); and (2) International region (Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Japan). For purposes of discussing results by segment, management excludes the impact of certain items, consistent with the manner by which management evaluates the performance of each segment. This format is useful to investors because it allows analysis and comparability of operating trends. It also includes the same information that is used by Teradata management to make decisions regarding the segments and to assess financial performance. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of the segments based on revenue and multiple profit measures, including segment gross margin. For management reporting purposes assets are not allocated to the segments. Our segment results are reconciled to total company results reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior period segment information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The following table presents revenue and operating performance by segment for the years ended December 31:
35
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Segment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Americas Data and Analytics
|
$
|
1,334
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
International Data and Analytics
|
919
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
907
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Total Data and Analytics
|
2,253
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
2,568
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Marketing Applications
|
69
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
153
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
164
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Total segment revenue
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Americas Data and Analytics
|
$
|
754
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
International Data and Analytics
|
425
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
429
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
523
|
|
|
50.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Total Data and Analytics
|
1,179
|
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
52.7
|
%
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Marketing Applications
|
33
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
|
63
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
78
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Total segment gross margin
|
$
|
1,212
|
|
|
52.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
55.6
|
%
|
Americas Data and Analytics:
Revenue decreased 9% as customers continue to evaluate lower cost (and less capital intensive) alternatives as well as our new purchasing and deployment options. As discussed in the future trends section of this MD&A, the revenue decline was driven by our customers' focus on less capital intensive options like cloud, subscription licenses, rental and usage-based models, which results in revenue being recognized over time instead of upfront. Segment gross margins as a percentage of revenue were higher driven by an increase in product gross margin. The increase in the product gross margin was driven by favorable deal and product mix.
In 2015, revenue was down 4% primarily driven by a decrease in customer large capital expenditure transactions. The results included a 2% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuations. Gross margins as a percentage of revenue were down in 2015 compared to 2014 due to the high mix of hardware versus software deals and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates.
International Data and Analytics:
Revenue increased by 1%, which included a 2% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuations. The revenue increase was led by good growth in Western Europe and China. Gross margins were down due to a higher mix of service revenue, which has a lower margin profile versus product revenue.
In 2015, revenue was down 12%, which was almost entirely due to a 11% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuation. Gross margins were down due to lower revenue volume from foreign currency fluctuations and a higher mix of service revenue, which has a lower margin profile versus product revenue.
Marketing Applications:
Revenue decreased by $84 million or 55% in 2016 from 2015. The decline in revenue was driven by the divestiture of the marketing applications business on July 1, 2016. Prior to its divestiture, the overall segment gross margin increase was primarily driven by higher product and professional services margins. In 2015, the Company made investments to help better position the Company to go broader in the market, which resulted in lower service margins in 2015.
In 2015, revenue decreased $11 million or 7% from 2014. The revenue decrease included a 6% adverse impact from foreign currency fluctuations. The overall gross margin decrease in 2015 from 2014 is primarily driven by investments in the cloud business as well as lower professional services margins, which were impacted by investments to help better position the Company to go broader in the market and drive long-term growth in this business.
36
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Teradata ended 2016 with $
974 million
in cash and cash equivalents, a $
135 million
increase from the
December 31, 2015
balance, after using approximately
$82 million
for repurchases of Company common stock, and approximately $16 million for acquisitions and investment activities which were completed during the year. Cash provided by operating activities increased by
$45 million
to
$446 million
in
2016
. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to favorable changes in net working capital, primarily due to a larger collection of receivables as compared to the prior year.
Teradata’s management uses a non-GAAP measure called “free cash flow,” which is not a measure defined under GAAP. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures for property and equipment, and additions to capitalized software, as one measure of assessing the financial performance of the Company, and this may differ from the definition used by other companies. The components that are used to calculate free cash flow are GAAP measures taken directly from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We believe that free cash flow information is useful for investors because it relates the operating cash flow of the Company to the capital that is spent to continue and improve business operations. In particular, free cash flow indicates the amount of cash available after capital expenditures for, among other things, investments in the Company’s existing businesses, strategic acquisitions and repurchase of Teradata common stock. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures since there may be other non-discretionary expenditures that are not deducted from the measure. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, cash flows from operating activities under GAAP.
The table below shows net cash provided by operating activities and capital expenditures for the following periods:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Expenditures for property and equipment
|
(53
|
)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|||
|
Additions to capitalized software
|
(65
|
)
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|||
|
Free cash flow
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
Financing activities and certain other investing activities are not included in our calculation of free cash flow. In
2016
and
2015
, these other investing activities primarily consisted of immaterial complementary business acquisitions and equity investment activities that were closed during these years along with the sale of the marketing applications business on July 1, 2016.
Teradata’s financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 primarily consisted of cash outflows of
$82 million
for share repurchases, repayments of credit facility borrowings of $180 million, repayment of existing term loan of $30 million and $30 million from other financing activities, net of tax paid for shares withheld upon equity award settlement. Teradata's financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2015
primarily consisted of cash outflows of $657 million for share repurchases, proceeds from credit facility borrowings of $180 million, repayments of credit facility borrowings of $220 million, and proceeds from a new term loan of $600 million and repayment of an existing term loan of $247 million. The Company purchased 3.4 million shares of its common stock at an average price per share of
$24.25
in 2016, 19 million shares at an average price per share of $34.15 in 2015, and 13 million shares at an average price per share of $43.09 in 2014.
Share repurchases were made under two share repurchase programs initially authorized by our Board of Directors in 2008. The first program (the “dilution offset program”) authorizes the Company to repurchase Teradata common stock to the extent of cash received from the exercise of stock options and the Teradata Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) to offset dilution from shares issued pursuant to these plans. On February 6, 2012, the board approved a new $300 million share repurchase authorization to replace a prior $300 million authorization (the “general share repurchase program”), that was to expire on February 10, 2012. Since February 2012, Teradata’s Board of Directors has approved, in $300 million increments, additional share repurchase authorizations for a total of $2.0 billion under the Company’s general share repurchase program on each of the following dates: December
37
10, 2012, October 14, 2013, May 5, 2014, December 18, 2014 and May 4, 2015. An additional share repurchase authorization of $500 million was approved by the board on August 20, 2015. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company had $512 million of authorization remaining to repurchase outstanding shares of Teradata common stock under the general share repurchase program. Share repurchases made by the Company are reported on a trade date basis. Our share repurchase activity depends on factors such as our working capital needs, our cash requirements for capital investments, our stock price, and economic and market conditions, as well as merger and acquisition opportunities. Proceeds from the ESPP and the exercise of stock options were $31 million in 2016, $24 million in 2015 and $29 million in 2014. These proceeds are included in other financing activities, net in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Our total cash and cash equivalents held outside the U.S. in various foreign subsidiaries was $957 million as of
December 31, 2016
and $819 million as of
December 31, 2015
. The remaining balance held in the U.S. was $17 million as of
December 31, 2016
and $20 million as of
December 31, 2015
. Under current tax laws and regulations, if cash and cash equivalents held outside the U.S. are distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and potential foreign withholding taxes. As of December 31, 2016, we have not provided for the U.S. federal tax liability on approximately
$1.3 billion
of foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested outside of the U.S.
On March 25, 2015, Teradata replaced its existing five-year, $300 million revolving credit facility with a new $400 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility ends on March 25, 2020 at which point any remaining outstanding borrowings would be due for repayment unless extended by agreement of the parties for up to two additional one-year periods. The interest rate charged on borrowings pursuant to the Credit Facility can vary depending on the interest rate option the Company chooses to utilize and the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. In
2016
, Teradata chose a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Credit Facility is unsecured and contains certain representations and warranties, conditions, affirmative, negative and financial covenants, and events of default customary for such facilities. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Credit Facility, leaving
$400 million
in additional borrowing capacity available. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of
December 31, 2016
.
Also on March 25, 2015, Teradata closed on a new senior unsecured $600 million five-year term loan, the proceeds of which were used to pay off the remaining $247 million of principal on its existing term loan, pay off the $220 million outstanding balance on the prior credit facility, and fund share repurchases. The $600 million term loan is payable in quarterly installments, which commenced on March 31, 2016, with all remaining principal due in March 2020. The outstanding principal amount under the term loan agreement bears interest at a floating rate based upon a negotiated base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus in each case a margin based on the leverage ratio of the Company. As of
December 31, 2016
, the term loan principal outstanding was $570 million and carried an interest rate of 2.1875%. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2016.
Management believes current cash, cash flows from operations and the $400 million available under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to satisfy future working capital, research and development activities, capital expenditures, pension contributions, severance benefits and other financing requirements for at least the next twelve months. The Company principally holds its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposits and highly-rated money market funds.
The Company’s ability to generate positive cash flows from operations is dependent on general economic conditions, competitive pressures, and other business and risk factors described elsewhere in this Annual Report. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, or otherwise to comply with the terms of the credit facility and term loan agreement, the Company may be required to seek additional financing alternatives.
38
Contractual and Other Commercial Commitments.
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that impact, or could impact, our liquidity. The following table and discussion outlines our material obligations at
December 31, 2016
, with projected cash payments in the periods shown:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2018-
|
|
2020-
|
|
2022 and
|
||||||||||
|
In millions
|
Amounts
|
|
2017
|
|
2019
|
|
2021
|
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt
|
36
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Lease obligations
|
67
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
8
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase obligations
|
17
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Total debt, lease and purchase obligations
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Our principal payments on long-term debt represent the expected cash payments on our
$600 million
term loan and do not include any fair value adjustments or discounts and premiums. Our interest payments on long-term debt represent the estimated cash interest payments based on the prevailing interest rate as of
December 31, 2016
. As of December 31, 2016, the
Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, leaving $400 million in additional borrowing capacity available. Our lease obligations in the above table include Company facilities in various domestic and international locations. Purchase obligations are committed purchase orders and other contractual commitments for goods and services, and include non-cancelable contractual payments for fixed or minimum amounts to be purchased in relation to service agreements with various vendors for ongoing telecommunications, information technology, hosting and other services.
Additionally, the Company has
$20 million
in total uncertain tax positions recorded as non-current liabilities on its balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016
. These items are not included in the table of obligations shown above. The settlement period for the non-current income tax liabilities cannot be reasonably estimated as the timing and the amount of the payments, if any, will depend on possible future tax examinations with the various tax authorities. However, it is not expected that any payments will be due within the next
12
months.
We also have product warranties and guarantees to third parties, as well as postemployment and international pension obligations that may affect future cash flow. These items are not included in the table of obligations shown above. Product warranties and third-party guarantees are described in detail in “Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Postemployment and pension obligations are described in detail in “Note 6—Employee Benefit Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
We do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In connection with the preparation of these financial statements, we are required to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related disclosure of contingent liabilities. These assumptions, estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable at the time. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Our critical accounting policies are those that require assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material impact on our financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or circumstances. Our management periodically reviews these estimates and assumptions to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and are materially correct.
39
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require significant management judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. The significant accounting policies and estimates that we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are discussed in the paragraphs below. Teradata’s senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of Teradata’s Board of Directors. For additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures required by GAAP, see “Note 1—Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue recognition for complex contractual arrangements requires judgment, including a review of specific contracts, past experience, creditworthiness of customers, international laws and other factors. Specifically, complex arrangements with nonstandard terms and conditions may require significant contract interpretation to determine the appropriate accounting. We must also apply judgment in determining all deliverables of the arrangement, and in determining the relative selling price of each deliverable, considering the price charged for each product when sold on a standalone basis, and applicable renewal rates for services. Changes in judgments about these factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized between periods.
The Company reviews the relative selling price on a periodic basis and updates it, when appropriate, to ensure that the practices employed reflect the Company’s recent pricing experience. The Company maintains internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates, which includes review and approval by the Company’s management. For the year ended
December 31, 2016
there was no material impact to revenue resulting from changes in the relative selling price, nor does the Company expect a material impact from such changes in the near term.
Capitalized Software
Costs incurred in researching and developing a computer software product that will be sold, leased or otherwise marketed are charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established. Technological feasibility is established when planning, designing and initial coding activities that are necessary to establish that the product can be produced to meet its design specifications are complete. In the absence of a detailed program design or for agile development activities, a working model is used to establish technological feasibility. Once technological feasibility is established, all development costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established. The timing of when various research and development projects become technologically feasible or ready for release can cause fluctuations in the amount of research and development costs that are expensed or capitalized in any given period, thus impacting our reported profitability for that period.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company began moving towards more frequent releases of its products, which significantly shortens the opportunity to capitalize software development costs. Our research and development efforts have become more driven by market requirements and rapidly changing customers' needs. In addition, the Company started applying agile development methodologies to help respond to new technologies and trends. Agile development methodologies are characterized by a more dynamic development process with more frequent and iterative revisions to a product releases' features and functions as the software is being developed. Due to the shorter development cycle and focus on rapid production associated with agile development, the Company does not anticipate capitalizing significant amounts of external use software development costs in future periods due to the relatively short duration between the completion of the working model and the point at which a product is ready for general release. Prior capitalized costs will continue to be amortized under the greater of revenue-based or straight-line method over the estimated useful life.
Income Taxes
In accounting for income taxes, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities
40
are determined based on the enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized.
The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside of the U.S. As a result, the effective tax rates are largely based upon the pre-tax earnings mix and allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business. These jurisdictions apply a broad range of statutory income tax rates; the U.S. statutory corporate income tax rate is currently 35% as compared to the overall statutory effective tax rate of our various foreign jurisdictions of approximately 12%. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company has not provided for federal income taxes on earnings of approximately
$1.3 billion
from its foreign subsidiaries.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing thresholds and attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. We record any interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax expense line on our Consolidated Statements of Income. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company has a total of $30 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which
$20 million
is included in the other liabilities section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as a non-current liability. The remaining balance of $10 million of uncertain tax positions relates to certain tax attributes both generated by the Company and acquired in various acquisitions, which are netted against the underlying deferred tax assets recorded on the balance sheet.
We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. We recorded
$26 million
in
2016
and
$25 million
in
2015
for valuation allowances. Due to a change in tax law enacted in the state of California in the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company established a valuation allowance to partially offset its California R&D tax credit carryforward deferred tax asset, as the Company expects to continue to generate excess California R&D tax credits into the foreseeable future.
Stock-based Compensation
We measure compensation cost for stock awards at fair value and recognize compensation expense over the service period for which awards are expected to vest. We utilize pricing models, including the Black-Scholes option pricing model and Monte Carlo simulation model, to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation at the date of grant. These valuation models require the input of subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected term. In addition, we issue performance-based awards that vest only if specific performance conditions are satisfied. The number of shares that will be earned can vary based on actual performance. No shares will vest if the threshold objectives are not met. In the event the objectives are exceeded, additional shares will vest up to a maximum payout. The cost of these awards is expensed over the performance period based upon management’s estimate and analysis of the probability of meeting the performance criteria. Because the actual number of shares to be awarded is not known until the end of the performance period, the actual compensation expense related to these awards could differ from our current expectations.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company tests goodwill by first performing a qualitative analysis (Step 0) to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is below its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic, market and industry conditions, and overall financial performance of the reporting unit. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is below its carrying value after assessing these qualitative factors, then the guidance on goodwill impairment requires the company to perform a two-step impairment test. In the first step, the Company compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The Company typically determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of fair values derived from the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, the Company calculates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The market approach estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and
41
earnings derived from comparable companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the second step of the impairment test is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. The implied fair value of the goodwill in step two analysis is determined by the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations which requires the company to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities and to allocate the fair value between net assets and goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then the company records an impairment loss equal to the difference. Teradata reviewed two reporting units in its 2016 goodwill impairment assessment, as each operating segment was deemed as a reporting unit for purposes of testing. Based on the Company's evaluation and weighting of the events and circumstances that have occurred since the most recent Step 1 test, the Company concluded that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was below its carrying value. Therefore, the Company determined that it was not necessary to perform a Step 1 goodwill impairment test for the reporting units in 2016. See “Note 3—Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets" for additional information.
The acquisition method of accounting for business combinations requires the Company to estimate the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree to properly allocate any excess purchase price consideration between net assets and goodwill. Impairment testing for assets, other than goodwill, requires the allocation of cash flows to those assets or group of assets and if required, an estimate of fair value for the assets or group of assets.
Determining the fair value of goodwill and acquired intangibles is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, discount rates and future economic and market conditions. The company’s estimates are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. These valuations require the use of management’s assumptions, which may not reflect unanticipated events and circumstances that may occur.
Pension and Postemployment Benefits
We measure pension and postemployment benefit costs and credits using actuarial valuations. Actuarial assumptions attempt to anticipate future events and are used in calculating the expense and liability relating to these plans. These factors include assumptions we make about interest rates, expected investment return on plan assets, total and involuntary turnover rates, and rates of future compensation increases. In addition, our actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal rates and mortality rates to develop our valuations. We review and update these assumptions on an annual basis at the beginning of each fiscal year. We are required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in making these assumptions. The actuarial assumptions that we use may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the measurement of our pension and postemployment benefit obligations, and to the amount of pension and postemployment benefits expense we have recorded or may record. For example, as of
December 31, 2016
, a one-half percent increase/decrease in the discount rate would change the projected benefit obligation of our pension plans by approximately $6 million, and a one-half percent increase/decrease in our involuntary turnover assumption would change our postemployment benefit obligation by approximately $11 million.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
A discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements is described in “Note 1—Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report, and we incorporate such discussion by reference.
42
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The Company employs a foreign currency hedging strategy to limit potential losses in earnings or cash flows from adverse foreign currency exchange rate movements. Foreign currency exposures arise from transactions denominated in a currency other than the Company’s functional currency and from foreign denominated revenue and profit translated into U.S. dollars. The primary currencies to which the Company is exposed include the euro, the British pound, the Japanese yen, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar and other Asian and South American currencies. Exposures are hedged with foreign currency forward contracts with maturity dates of twelve months or less. The potential loss in fair value at December 31, 2016, for such contracts resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in all foreign currency exchange rates is approximately $2 million. This loss would be mitigated by corresponding gains on the underlying exposures. For additional information regarding the Company’s foreign currency hedging strategy, see “Note 7— Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report.
43
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Teradata Corporation:
In our opinion, the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Teradata Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(
2013
) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
|
|
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
February 27, 2017
|
44
TERADATA CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
In millions, except per share amounts
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31
|
||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
1,433
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
2,322
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|||
|
Costs and operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Cost of products
|
352
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
443
|
|
|||
|
Cost of services
|
782
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
810
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
664
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
770
|
|
|||
|
Research and development expenses
|
212
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
206
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill, acquired intangibles and other assets
|
80
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total costs and operating expenses
|
2,090
|
|
|
2,725
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|||
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
232
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
503
|
|
|||
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
1
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|||
|
Total other (expense) income, net
|
(11
|
)
|
|
51
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
221
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
494
|
|
|||
|
Income tax expense
|
96
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
127
|
|
|||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic
|
129.7
|
|
|
139.6
|
|
|
155.3
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
131.5
|
|
|
139.6
|
|
|
157.8
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
45
TERADATA CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
In millions
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31
|
||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|||
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reclassification of gain to net income
|
—
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities, before tax
|
—
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
50
|
|
|||
|
Tax impact on securities
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|||
|
Net change in securities
|
—
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
31
|
|
|||
|
Defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reclassification of loss to net income
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
Defined benefit plan adjustment, before tax
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|||
|
Defined benefit plan adjustment, tax portion
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
|
Defined benefit plan adjustment, net of tax
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
46
TERADATA CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
In millions, except per share amounts
|
|
At December 31
|
||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
974
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
548
|
|
|
580
|
|
||
|
Inventories
|
34
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
Assets held for sale
|
—
|
|
|
214
|
|
||
|
Other current assets
|
65
|
|
|
52
|
|
||
|
Total current assets
|
1,621
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
138
|
|
|
143
|
|
||
|
Capitalized software, net
|
187
|
|
|
190
|
|
||
|
Goodwill
|
390
|
|
|
380
|
|
||
|
Acquired intangible assets, net
|
11
|
|
|
22
|
|
||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
49
|
|
|
41
|
|
||
|
Other assets
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
2,527
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
180
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable
|
103
|
|
|
96
|
|
||
|
Payroll and benefits liabilities
|
139
|
|
|
120
|
|
||
|
Deferred revenue
|
369
|
|
|
367
|
|
||
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
||
|
Other current liabilities
|
88
|
|
|
102
|
|
||
|
Total current liabilities
|
729
|
|
|
953
|
|
||
|
Long-term debt
|
538
|
|
|
567
|
|
||
|
Pension and other postemployment plan liabilities
|
96
|
|
|
89
|
|
||
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
33
|
|
|
28
|
|
||
|
Other liabilities
|
32
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities
|
1,442
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
||
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Preferred stock: par value $0.01 per share, 100.0 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Common stock: par value $0.01 per share, 500.0 shares authorized, 130.6 and 130.7 shares issued at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
|
Paid-in capital
|
1,220
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(161
|
)
|
|
(204
|
)
|
||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(89
|
)
|
|
(76
|
)
|
||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
971
|
|
|
849
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
2,527
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
47
TERADATA CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
In millions
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31
|
||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
128
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
169
|
|
|||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
62
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
50
|
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
|
(Gain) loss on investments
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
9
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill, acquired intangibles and other assets
|
80
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Receivables
|
40
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
101
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
14
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
18
|
|
|||
|
Account payables and accrued expenses
|
11
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred revenue
|
1
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|||
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
(10
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
21
|
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
446
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
680
|
|
|||
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Expenditures for property and equipment
|
(53
|
)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|||
|
Additions to capitalized software
|
(65
|
)
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from disposition of investments
|
2
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from sale of business
|
92
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Business acquisitions and other investing activities, net
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(35
|
)
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings
|
—
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
220
|
|
|||
|
Repayments of credit-facility borrowings
|
(180
|
)
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
(82
|
)
|
|
(657
|
)
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|||
|
Other financing activities, net
|
30
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
29
|
|
|||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(262
|
)
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
135
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
139
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
839
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
695
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
974
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
Supplemental data
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
Interest
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
48
TERADATA CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
In millions
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2013
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,184
|
)
|
|
$
|
973
|
|
|
$
|
2,033
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
1,857
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Employee stock compensation, employee stock purchase programs and option exercises
|
2
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
||||||||||
|
Income tax benefit from stock compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Retirement of common stock previously held as treasury
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
(1,184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock, retired
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Pension and postemployment benefit plans, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2014
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,707
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Employee stock compensation, employee stock purchase programs and option exercises
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Income tax benefit from stock compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock, retired
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Pension and postemployment benefit plans, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2015
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Employee stock compensation, employee stock purchase programs and option exercises
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchases of common stock, retired
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Pension and postemployment benefit plans, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2016
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
971
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of the Business.
Teradata Corporation (“Teradata” or the “Company”) is a global leader in analytic data platforms, analytic applications and related services. The Company’s analytic data platforms are comprised of software, hardware, and related business consulting and support services for data warehousing and big data analytics.
Basis of Presentation.
The financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
Use of Estimates.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the period reported. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates and judgments, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, the valuation of inventory to net realizable value, impairments of goodwill and other intangibles, stock-based compensation, pension and other postemployment benefits, and income taxes and any changes will be accounted for on a prospective basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition.
Teradata’s solution offerings typically include software, unspecified when-and-if-available upgrades, hardware, maintenance support services, and other consulting, implementation and installation-related (“consulting”) services. Teradata records revenue when it is realized, or realizable, and earned. Teradata considers these requirements met when:
|
•
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists
|
|
•
|
The products or services have been delivered to the customer
|
|
•
|
The sales price is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or significant uncertainties
|
|
•
|
Collectibility is reasonably assured
|
Teradata reports revenue net of any taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with specific revenue-producing transactions. The Company assesses whether fees are fixed or determinable at the time of sale. Standard payment terms may vary based on the country in which the agreement is executed, but are generally between
30 days
and
90
days. Payments that are due within six months are generally deemed to be fixed or determinable based on a successful collection history on such arrangements, and thereby satisfy the required criteria for revenue recognition. Teradata delivers its solutions primarily through direct sales channels, as well as through alliances with system integrators, other independent software vendors and distributors, and value-added resellers (collectively referred to as “resellers”). In assessing whether the sales price to a reseller is fixed or determinable, the Company considers, among other things, past business practices with the reseller, the reseller’s operating history, payment terms, return rights and the financial wherewithal of the reseller. When Teradata determines that the contract fee to a reseller is not fixed or determinable, that transaction is deferred and recognized upon sell-through to the end customer.
The Company’s deliverables often involve delivery or performance at different periods of time. Revenue for software is generally recognized upon delivery with the hardware once title and risk of loss have been transferred. Revenue for unspecified upgrades or enhancements on a when-and-if-available basis are recognized straight-line over the term of the arrangement. Revenue for maintenance support services is also recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Revenue for other consulting, implementation and installation services is recognized as services are provided. In certain instances, acceptance of the product or service is specified by the customer. In such cases, revenue is deferred until the acceptance criteria have been met. Delivery and acceptance generally occur in the same reporting period. The Company’s arrangements generally do not include any customer negotiated provisions for cancellation, termination or refunds that would significantly impact recognized revenue.
The Company evaluates all deliverables in an arrangement to determine whether they represent separate units of accounting. A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value, and if the contract
50
includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered items is considered probable and substantially in the control of Teradata. Most of the Company’s products and services qualify as separate units of accounting and are recognized upon meeting the criteria as described above.
For multiple deliverable arrangements that contain non-software related deliverables, the Company allocates revenue to each deliverable based upon the relative selling price hierarchy and if software and software-related deliverables are also included in the arrangement, to those deliverables as a group based on the best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) for the group. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”) if available, third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, or BESP if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. The Company then recognizes revenue when the remaining revenue recognition criteria are met for each deliverable. For the software group or arrangements that contain only software and software-related deliverables, the revenue is allocated utilizing the residual or fair value method. Under the residual method, the VSOE of the undelivered elements is deferred and accounted for under the applicable revenue recognition guidance, and the remaining portion of the software arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue. The fair value method is similar to the relative selling price method used for non-software deliverables except that the allocation of each deliverable is based on VSOE. For software groups or arrangements that contain only software and software-related deliverables in which VSOE does not exist for each deliverable (fair value method) or does not exist for each undelivered element (residual method), revenue for the entire software arrangement or group is deferred and not recognized until delivery of all elements without VSOE has occurred, unless the only undelivered element is postcontract customer support (“PCS”) in which case the entire software arrangement or group is recognized ratably over the PCS period.
Teradata’s analytic database software and hardware products are sold and delivered together in the form of a “Node” of capacity as an integrated technology solution. Because both the analytic database software and hardware platform are necessary to deliver the analytic data platform’s essential functionality, the database software and hardware (Node) are excluded from the software rules and considered a non-software related deliverable. Teradata software applications and related support are considered software-related deliverables. Additionally, the amount of revenue allocated to the delivered items utilizing the relative selling price or fair value method is limited to the amount that is not contingent upon the delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions (the non-contingent amount).
VSOE is based upon the normal pricing and discounting practices for those products and services when sold separately. Teradata uses the stated renewal rate approach in establishing VSOE for maintenance and when-and-if-available upgrades (collectively referred to as PCS). Under this approach, the Company assesses whether the contractually stated renewal rates are substantive and consistent with the Company’s normal pricing practices. Renewal rates greater than the lower level of our targeted pricing ranges are considered to be substantive and, therefore, meet the requirements to support VSOE. In instances where there is not a substantive renewal rate in the arrangement, the Company allocates revenue based upon BESP, using the minimum established pricing targets as supported by the renewal rates for similar customers utilizing the bell-curve method. Teradata also offers consulting and installation-related services to its customers, which are considered non-software deliverables if they relate to the nodes. These services are rarely considered essential to the functionality of the data warehouse solution deliverable and there is never software customization of the proprietary database software. VSOE for consulting services is based on the hourly rates for standalone consulting services projects by geographic region and are indicative of the Company’s customary pricing practices. Pricing in each market is structured to obtain a reasonable margin based on input costs.
In nearly all multiple-deliverable arrangements, the Company is unable to establish VSOE for all deliverables in the arrangement. This is due to infrequently selling each deliverable separately (such is the case with our nodes), not pricing products or services within a narrow range, or only having a limited sales history. When VSOE cannot be established, attempts are made to establish TPE of the selling price for each deliverable. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. However, Teradata’s offerings contain significant differentiation such that the comparable pricing of products with similar functionality cannot typically be obtained. This is because Teradata’s products contain a significant amount of proprietary technology and its solutions offer substantially different features and functionality than other available products. As Teradata’s products are significantly different from those of its competitors, the Company is unable to establish TPE for the vast majority of its products.
51
When the Company is unable to establish selling prices using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses BESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service was sold on a standalone basis. The Company determines BESP for a product or service by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, geographies, market conditions, product life cycles, competitive landscape, internal costs, gross margin objectives, purchase volumes and pricing practices.
The primary consideration in developing BESP for the Company’s nodes is the bell-curve method based on historical transactions. The BESP analysis is at the geography level in order to align it with the way in which the Company goes to market and establishes pricing for its products. The Company has established discount ranges off of published list prices for different geographies based on strategy and maturity of Teradata’s presence in the respective geography. There are distinctions in each geography and product group which support the use of geographies and markets for the determination of BESP. For example, the Company’s U.S. market is relatively mature and most of the large transactions are captured in this market, whereas the International markets are less mature with generally smaller deal size. Additionally, the prices and margins for the Company’s products vary by geography and by product class. BESP is analyzed on a semi-annual basis using data from the four previous quarters, which the Company believes best reflects most recent pricing practices in a changing marketplace.
The Company reviews VSOE, TPE and its determination of BESP on a periodic basis and updates it, when appropriate, to ensure that the practices employed reflect the Company’s recent pricing experience. The Company maintains internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates, which includes review and approval by the Company’s management. For the year ended
December 31, 2016
there was no material impact to revenue resulting from changes in VSOE, TPE or BESP, nor does the Company expect a material impact from such changes in the near term.
Teradata’s new go-to-market offerings introduced in the second half of 2016, which are part of the overall business transformation strategy, include the following offerings:
|
•
|
Subscription license - Teradata’s subscription licenses include a right-to-use license and are typically sold with PCS. The revenue for these arrangements is typically recognized ratably over the contract term. The term of these arrangements varies between
one
and
five
years.
|
|
•
|
Software as a service or Cloud - These arrangements include a right-to-access software license that the customer does not have a right to take possession of without significant penalty during the hosting period and the services can be delivered through a managed cloud, private cloud or public cloud. These arrangements are recognized outside the software rules and revenue is recognized ratably over the contract term. The term of these arrangements typically varies between
one
and
five
years.
|
|
•
|
Rentals - Teradata owns the equipment and may or may not provide managed services. The revenue for these arrangements is generally recognized straight-line over the term of the contract. The term of these arrangements typically varies between
one
and
three
years and are generally accounted for as operating leases.
|
|
•
|
Utility model - Teradata owns the equipment and may or may not provide managed services. Utility models typically include a minimum fixed amount that is recognized ratably over the contract term in addition to an elastic amount for usage above the minimum, which is recognized monthly based on actual utilization. The term of these arrangements varies between
one
and
five
years.
|
Shipping and Handling.
Product shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
All short-term, highly-liquid investments having original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
Teradata establishes provisions for doubtful accounts using both percentages of accounts receivable balances to reflect historical average credit losses and specific provisions for known issues.
Inventories.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of service parts is determined using the average cost method. Finished goods inventory is determined using actual cost.
52
Available-for-sale Securities.
Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses are included in other income and expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (loss).
Long-Lived Assets
Property and Equipment
. Property and equipment, leasehold improvements and rental equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the related assets primarily on a straight-line basis. Equipment is depreciated over
3
to
20
years and buildings over
25
to
45
years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the life of the lease or the asset, whichever is shorter. Total depreciation expense on the Company’s property and equipment for
December 31
was as follows:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Depreciation expense
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Capitalized Software
. Direct development costs associated with internal-use software are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the resulting software. The costs are capitalized when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that computer software being developed will be completed and placed in service. Teradata typically amortizes capitalized internal-use software on a straight-line basis over
three
years beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use.
Costs incurred for the development of big data and analytic applications are expensed as incurred based on the frequency and agile nature of development. Prior to December 31, 2016, costs incurred for the development of analytic database software that will be sold, leased or otherwise marketed were capitalized between technological feasibility and the point at which a product is ready for general release. Technological feasibility is established when planning, designing and initial coding activities that are necessary to establish the product can be produced to meet its design specifications are complete. In the absence of a program design, a working model is used to establish technological feasibility. These costs are included within capitalized software and are amortized over the estimated useful lives of
four
years using the greater of the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product beginning when the product is available for general release. Costs capitalized include direct labor and related overhead costs. Costs incurred prior to technological feasibility and after general release are expensed as incurred. The following table identifies the activity relating to capitalized software:
|
|
Internal-use Software
|
|
External-use Software
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||||||||
|
Beginning balance at January 1
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
68
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
(65
|
)
|
||||||
|
Ending balance at December 31
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense (actual and estimated) for internal-use and external-use software for the following periods is:
|
|
Actual
|
|
For the years ended (estimated)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
||||||||||||
|
Internal-use software amortization expense
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
External-use software amortization expense
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Estimated expense, which is recorded to cost of sales for external use software, is based on capitalized software at
December 31, 2016
and does not include any new capitalization for future periods.
Our research and development efforts have recently become more driven by market requirements and rapidly changing customers' needs. In addition, the Company started applying agile development methodologies to help respond to new technologies and trends. Agile development methodologies are characterized by a more dynamic development process with more frequent and iterative revisions to a product release features and functions as the software is being developed. Due to the shorter development cycle and focus on rapid production associated with
53
agile development, the Company does not anticipate capitalizing significant amounts of external use software development costs in future periods due to the relatively short duration between the completion of the working model and the point at which a product is ready for general release. Prior capitalized costs will continue to be amortized under the greater of revenue-based or straight-line method over the estimated useful life.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets.
Long-lived assets such as property and equipment, acquired intangible assets and internal capitalized software are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount.
Goodwill
. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill amounts are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment annually or upon occurrence of an event or change in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. See Note 3- Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles for additional information.
Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale.
The Company classifies assets and liabilities (disposal groups) to be sold as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met:
|
•
|
Management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the disposal group;
|
|
•
|
The disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such disposal groups;
|
|
•
|
An active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the disposal group have been initiated;
|
|
•
|
The sale of the disposal group is probable, and transfer of the disposal group is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year, except if events or circumstances beyond the Company’s control extend the period of time required to sell the disposal group beyond one year;
|
|
•
|
The disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and
|
|
•
|
Actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
|
The Company initially measures a disposal group that is classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held for sale criteria are met. Conversely, gains are not recognized until the date of sale. The Company assesses the fair value of a disposal group less costs to sell each reporting period it remains classified as held for sale and reports any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the carrying value of the disposal group at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.
Upon determining that a disposal group meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the Company reports the assets and liabilities of the disposal group under Assets held for sale and Liabilities held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 15 for further information on the Company’s assets and liabilities held for sale.
Warranty.
Provisions for product warranties are recorded in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. The Company accrues warranty reserves using percentages of revenue to reflect the Company’s historical average warranty claims.
Research and Development Costs.
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred (with the exception of the capitalized software development costs discussed above). Research and development costs primarily include labor-related costs, contractor fees, and overhead expenses directly related to research and development support.
Pension and Postemployment Benefits.
The Company accounts for its pension and postemployment benefit obligations using actuarial models. The measurement of plan obligations was made as of
December 31, 2016
. Liabilities are computed using the projected unit credit method. The objective under this method is to expense each participant’s benefits under the plan as they accrue, taking into consideration salary increases and the plan’s benefit
54
allocation formula. Thus, the total pension or postemployment benefit to which each participant is expected to become entitled is broken down into units, each associated with a year of past or future credited service.
The Company recognizes the funded status of its pension and postemployment plan obligations in its consolidated balance sheet and records in other comprehensive income certain gains and losses that arise during the period, but are deferred under pension accounting rules.
Foreign Currency.
Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in a local currency environment are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates. Income and expense accounts are translated at daily exchange rates prevailing during the period. Adjustments arising from the translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in determining net income.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense is provided based on income before income taxes in the various jurisdictions in which the Company conducts its business. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. These deferred taxes are determined based on the enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods in which the deferred assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized. Teradata recognizes tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company records valuation allowances related to its deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.
Stock-based Compensation.
Stock-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units, are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value. The fair value of each stock option award on the grant date is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, weighted-average risk-free interest rate and weighted average expected term of the options. The Company’s expected volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is based on Teradata's historical volatility. The expected term for options granted is based upon historical observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of options for all employees. Prior to 2015, the expected term assumption was based on the simplified method under GAAP, which is based on the vesting period and contractual term for each vesting tranche of awards. The mid-point between the vesting date and the expiration date was used as the expected term under this method. The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes model is based on the implied yield curve available on U.S. Treasury issues at the date of grant with a remaining term equal to the Company’s expected term assumption. The Company has never declared or paid a cash dividend.
Treasury Stock.
Prior to the
fourth
quarter of
2015
when all treasury stock shares were retired, shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased through the share repurchase programs were held as treasury stock. Treasury stock was accounted for using the cost method. Beginning in the
fourth
quarter of
2015
, stock repurchased through the share repurchase programs will be retired upon repurchase. The excess repurchase price over the par value is charged to retained earnings.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share.
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reported period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the weighted-average number of shares outstanding includes the dilution from potential shares added from stock options, restricted share awards and other stock awards. Refer to Note 5 for share information on the Company’s stock compensation plans.
The components of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are as follows:
55
|
|
For the years ended December 31
|
||||||||||
|
In millions, except earnings (loss) per share
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock
|
129.7
|
|
|
139.6
|
|
|
155.3
|
|
|||
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options, restricted shares and other stock awards
|
1.8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|||
|
Common stock and common stock equivalents
|
131.5
|
|
|
139.6
|
|
|
157.8
|
|
|||
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
Options to purchase
5.2 million
in
2016
,
4.5 million
shares in
2015
and
2.4 million
shares in
2014
of common stock, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
For
2015
, due to the net loss attributable to Teradata common stockholders, largely due to the goodwill and acquired intangibles impairment charges, potential common shares that would cause dilution, such as employee stock options, restricted shares and other stock awards, have been excluded from the diluted share count because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For
2015
, the fully diluted shares would have been
141.9 million
.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition.
I
n May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new guidance that affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The new guidance will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in the current revenue recognition guidance, and most industry-specific guidance. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement in this update. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, the FASB defines a five step process which includes the following: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In July 2015, the FASB issued a one-year delay in the effective date of the new standard. Under this guidance, the new revenue standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted. The standard allows entities to apply the standard retrospectively for all periods presented or alternatively an entity is permitted to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance as an opening balance sheet adjustment to retained earnings in the period of initial application.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an update that amends and clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations for reporting revenue gross rather than net. In April 2016, the FASB issued an update that amends and clarifies the identification of performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property.
In May 2016, the FASB issued an update which addresses the narrow-scope improvements to the guidance on collectibility, non-cash consideration, and completed contracts at transition. Additionally, the amendments in this update provide a practical expedient for contract modifications at transition and an accounting policy election related to the presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers. All updates issued in 2016 have the same deferred effective date. The Company plans to adopt the new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as well as the method of transition that will be used in adopting the standard.
56
Although the Company is still evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements, including evaluating the different adoption methodologies, the Company believes the most significant impacts may include the following items:
|
•
|
As the Company transitions to the new go-to-market offerings, such as subscription licenses, the Company could potentially see a more significant impact in the amount of revenue recognized over time under the current rules but upfront under the new rules
|
|
•
|
The Company currently expenses contract acquisition costs and believes that the requirement to defer incremental contract acquisition costs and recognize them over the term of the contract to which the costs relate could have an impact, especially as the Company transitions to longer-term, over-time revenue contracts
|
|
•
|
The amount of revenue allocated to the delivered items and recognized upfront utilizing the relative selling price model is limited to the amount that is not contingent upon the delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions (i.e. the non-contingent amount) under current rules. Under the new rules, the amounts allocated to delivered items and recognized upfront could be higher if it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of revenue recognized will not occur in future periods upon the delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions.
|
The Company does not expect that the new standard will result in substantive changes in our deliverables or the amounts of revenue allocated between multiple deliverables, with the exception of contingent revenue discussed above. The Company is still in the process of evaluating these impacts, and our initial assessment may change as the Company continues with implementing new systems, processes, accounting policies and internal controls.
Leases.
In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which requires a lessee to account for leases as finance or operating leases. Both leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet, with differing methodology for income statement recognition. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. Entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. This standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for leases existing or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
. In August 2016, the FASB issued an update addressing eight specific cash flow issues in an effort to reduce diversity in practice. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, and for interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated statements of cash flows.
Financial Instruments.
In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which enhances the reporting model for financial instruments and related disclosures. This update
requires equity securities to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through net income and will eliminate the cost method for equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
The provisions are effective for public entities with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, in certain circumstances. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Intra-entity asset transfers.
In October 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance to simplify the accounting for income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under this guidance, companies will be required to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity asset transfer when the transfer occurs. Current guidance prohibits companies from recognizing current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the period of adoption. The guidance is
57
effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements.
Classification of restricted cash
. In December 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance to address diversity in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. Under this guidance, companies will be required to present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on its statement of cash flows.
Clarification on the definition of a business
. In January 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This new guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements.
Simplifying the measurement for goodwill
. In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for the impairment of goodwill. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance is required to be applied prospectively and is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to early adopt this accounting guidance effective January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect any impact from the adoption of the new accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Guidance
Accounting for Share-based Payments with Performance Targets.
In June 2014, the FASB issued new guidance that requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2016. This amendment did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.
To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2016 on a retrospective basis. Debt issuance costs of
$3 million
at December 2015 and
$2 million
at
December 31, 2016
have been presented as a deduction from the carrying value of the related long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Intangibles, Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software.
The amendments in this update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change current guidance for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2016. This amendment did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
58
Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an update which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the Statements of Cash Flows. The Company elected to early adopt this standard in the quarter ended December 31, 2016 retroactively to January 1, 2016. The impact of early adoption resulted in the following:
|
•
|
The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (shortfalls) from vested or settled share-based awards to be recorded in the provision for income taxes on the income statement rather than in paid-in capital. This change was applied on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2016, which resulted in additional tax expense of
$5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
•
|
The tax withholding threshold for triggering liability accounting on a net settlement transaction has been increased from the minimum statutory rate to the maximum. This change was applied on a modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2016, which resulted in no impact to retained earnings as of January 1, 2016 where the cumulative effect of this change is required to be recorded.
|
|
•
|
The Company elected to change its accounting policy for forfeitures to record them as they occur. The change was applied on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of less than
$1 million
as of January 1, 2016.
|
|
•
|
The Company no longer reflects the cash received from the excess tax benefits within cash flows from financing activities but instead now reflects this benefit within cash flows from operating activities. This change in presentation was applied prospectively as of January 1, 2016, which resulted in an increase in net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used by financing activities of
$3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
•
|
The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to any of the periods presented on our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows since these cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity.
|
|
•
|
The Company excluded excess tax benefits from the assumed proceeds available to repurchase shares in the computation of our diluted earnings per share. This change was applied on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2016, which decreased diluted weighted average common shares outstanding by approximately
131
thousand shares in 2016.
|
59
Note 2 Supplemental Financial Information
|
|
At December 31
|
||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Trade
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
Other
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Accounts receivable, gross
|
567
|
|
|
597
|
|
||
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
||
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Finished goods
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
Service parts
|
14
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
Total inventories
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Land
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
|
||
|
Machinery and other equipment
|
354
|
|
|
336
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment, gross
|
439
|
|
|
422
|
|
||
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(301
|
)
|
|
(279
|
)
|
||
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Sales and value-added taxes
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
Pension and other postemployment plan liabilities
|
7
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
Other
|
53
|
|
|
50
|
|
||
|
Total other current liabilities
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Deferred revenue, current
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
||
|
Total deferred revenue
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
Above amounts exclude assets and liabilities held for sale. Refer to Note 15 for further information on the Company's assets and liabilities held for sale.
60
Note 3 Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The following table identifies the activity relating to goodwill by operating segment:
|
In millions
|
Balance At December 31, 2015
|
|
Additions
|
|
Currency
Translation Adjustments |
|
Balance At December 31, 2016
|
||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Americas Data and Analytics
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
International Data and Analytics
|
129
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
139
|
|
||||
|
Total goodwill
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company committed to a plan to exit the marketing applications business, which met the criteria for held for sale and continued to be reported under continuing operations. The business was subsequently sold on July 1, 2016. Not included in the table above is
$113 million
at December 31, 2015 for goodwill that had been classified as held for sale. See Note 15 for additional disclosures related to the sale of the business and impairment charges recorded for goodwill that had been classified as held for sale. During the third quarter of 2016, the Company recorded additional goodwill of
$11 million
, for an immaterial acquisition that occurred during the period.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill and determined that no impairment to the carrying value of goodwill was necessary. The Company reviewed two reporting units in its 2016 goodwill impairment assessment, as both geographic operating segments were considered separate reporting units for purposes of testing. Based on the Company's evaluation and weighting of the events and circumstances that have occurred since the most recent Step 1 test, the Company concluded that it was not more likely than not that each reporting unit's fair value was below its carrying value. Therefore, the Company determined that it was not necessary to perform a Step 1 goodwill impairment test for the reporting units in 2016.
Acquired intangible assets were specifically identified when acquired, and are deemed to have finite lives. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for Teradata’s acquired intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
Amortization
Life (in Years)
|
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
and Currency
Translation
Adjustments
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
and Currency
Translation
Adjustments
|
||||||||
|
Acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Intellectual property/developed technology
|
1 to 7
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
Customer relationships
|
3 to 10
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
|
Trademarks/trade names
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
|
In-process research and development
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
5
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
T
he gross carrying amount of acquired intangibles was reduced by certain intangible assets previously acquired that became fully amortized and were removed from the balance sheet. Not included in the table above is
$44 million
at December 31, 2015 for intangible assets that were classified as held for sale. See Note 15 for additional disclosures related to the sale of the business and impairment charges recorded for intangible assets that had been classified as held for sale.
The aggregate amortization expense (actual and estimated) for acquired intangible assets for the following periods is:
61
|
|
Actual
|
|
For the years ended (estimated)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortization expense
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Note 4 Income Taxes
For the years ended
December 31,
income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
Foreign
|
128
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
193
|
|
|||
|
Total income (loss) before income taxes
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
For the years ended
December 31,
income tax expense consisted of the following:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
State and local
|
7
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
8
|
|
|||
|
Foreign
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|||
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Federal
|
7
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
State and local
|
1
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Foreign
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
|
Total income tax expense
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
(48.6
|
)%
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|||
The following table presents the principal components of the difference between the effective tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|||
|
Income tax expense at the U.S. federal tax rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
Foreign income tax differential
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
State and local income taxes
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
U.S. permanent book/tax differences
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
U.S. manufacturing deduction permanent difference
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
(100.1
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Tax impact of sale of marketing applications business
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Impact of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Tax impact of U.S. tax law change - IRC Section 987
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Other, net
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
(48.6
|
)%
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
The
2016
effective tax rate was impacted by the
$57 million
of goodwill impairment charges recorded in the first quarter of 2016, all of which was treated as a permanent, non-deductible tax item. In addition, a discrete tax charge of
$22 million
was recorded in the third quarter of 2016 related to the tax impact of the sale of the marketing applications business, which occurred on July 1, 2016. In the fourth quarter of
2016
, the Company recorded
$8 million
of tax expense associated with the issuance of new U.S. Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 987 on December 7, 2016, which clarified how companies calculate foreign currency translation gains and losses for income tax purposes for branches whose accounting records are kept in a currency other than the currency of the company. Also in the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company elected to early adopt Accounting Standards
62
Update 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting. As a result, the Company incurred a
$5 million
discrete tax expense associated with the net shortfall arising from 2016 equity compensation vestings and exercises.
The 2015 effective tax rate was impacted by the
$437 million
of goodwill impairment charges recorded for 2015, of which $
414 million
was treated as a permanent non-deductible tax item. This resulted in full-year income tax expense in 2015 of
$70 million
, on a pre-tax net loss of
$(144) million
, causing a negative tax rate of
(48.6)%
. There were no material discrete tax items impacting the effective tax rate for full year
2014
.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities included in the balance sheets at
December 31
were as follows:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Employee pensions and other liabilities
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
Other balance sheet reserves and allowances
|
18
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
Tax loss and credit carryforwards
|
53
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
Deferred revenue
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
||
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
133
|
|
|
150
|
|
||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
||
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
107
|
|
|
125
|
|
||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Intangibles and capitalized software
|
63
|
|
|
81
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment
|
22
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
Other
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
91
|
|
|
112
|
|
||
|
Total net deferred income tax assets
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
As of
December 31, 2016
, Teradata has net operating loss ("NOL") and tax credit carryforwards totaling
$56 million
(tax effected and before any valuation allowance offset and application of recognition criteria for uncertain tax positions). Of the total tax carryforwards,
$13 million
are NOL's in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions, a small portion of which will begin to expire in
2019
;
$2 million
are U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards, which expire in 2021;
$37 million
are California R&D tax credits that have an indefinite carryforward period (which has a
$26 million
valuation allowance offset recorded); and the remaining
$4 million
are tax attributes that were acquired from various acquisitions and were not recorded for financial reporting purposes as they did not meet the recognition criteria for uncertain tax positions.
The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside of the U.S. As a result, the effective tax rates in the periods presented are largely based upon the pre-tax earnings mix and allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business; these jurisdictions apply a broad range of statutory income tax rates. At
December 31, 2016
, the Company had not provided for federal income taxes on earnings of approximately
$1.3 billion
from its foreign subsidiaries. Should these earnings be distributed in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to U.S. income taxes and potential withholding taxes in various international jurisdictions. The U.S. taxes would be partially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. tax liability is not practical because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.
The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company reflects any interest and penalties recorded in connection with its uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company’s uncertain tax positions totaled approximately
$30 million
, of which
$20 million
is reflected in the other liabilities section of the Company’s balance sheet as a non-current liability. The remaining balance of
$10 million
of uncertain tax positions relates to certain tax attributes both generated by the Company and acquired in various acquisitions, which are netted against the underlying deferred tax assets recorded
63
on the balance sheet. The entire balance of
$30 million
in uncertain tax positions would cause a decrease in the effective income tax rate upon recognition. Teradata has recorded
$2 million
of interest accruals related to its uncertain tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2016
.
Below is a rollforward of the Company’s liability related to uncertain tax positions at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
Gross decreases for prior period tax positions
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Gross increases for current period tax positions
|
3
|
|
|
6
|
|
||
|
Decreases due to the lapse of applicable statute of limitations
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||
|
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions, as well as numerous foreign jurisdictions. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company has ongoing tax audits in a limited number of state and foreign jurisdictions. However, no material adjustments have been proposed or made in any of these examinations to date which would result in any incremental income tax expense in future periods to the Company. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service audit of the Company’s U.S. Federal tax filing for tax year
2011
was finalized in
July of 2014
and resulted in a no change audit.
Note 5 Employee Stock-based Compensation Plans
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the years ended
December 31
as follows:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Stock options
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
Restricted shares
|
51
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
33
|
|
|||
|
Employee share repurchase program
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|||
|
Total stock-based compensation before income taxes
|
62
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
50
|
|
|||
|
Tax benefit
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|||
|
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
The Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 SIP”), as amended, and the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 SIP”) provide for the grant of several different forms of stock-based compensation. The 2012 SIP was adopted and approved by stockholders in April 2012 and no further awards may be made under the 2007 SIP after that time. A total of approximately
17.5 million
shares were authorized to be issued under the 2012 SIP. New shares of the Company’s common stock are issued as a result of the vesting of restricted share units and stock option exercises, and at the time of grant for restricted shares, for awards under both plans.
As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company’s primary types of stock-based compensation were stock options, restricted shares, restricted share units and the employee stock purchase program (the “ESPP”).
Stock Options
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of Teradata’s Board of Directors has discretion to determine the material terms and conditions of option awards under both the 2007 SIP and the 2012 SIP (collectively, the “Teradata SIP”), provided that (i) the exercise price must be no less than the fair market value of Teradata common stock (as defined in both plans) on the date of grant, and (ii) the term must be no longer than
ten years
. Option grants generally have a
four
-year vesting period.
The weighted-average fair value of options granted for Teradata equity awards was
$10.68
in 2016,
$11.37
in
2015
and
17.67
in
2014
. The fair value of each option award on the grant date was estimated using the Black-Scholes
64
option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|||
|
Dividend yield
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
6.3
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the year ended
December 31, 2016
:
|
Shares in thousands
|
Shares
Under
Option
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
millions)
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
|
7,574
|
|
|
$
|
34.91
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
Granted
|
1,013
|
|
|
$
|
28.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Exercised
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Canceled
|
(311
|
)
|
|
$
|
43.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(631
|
)
|
|
$
|
39.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
6,509
|
|
|
$
|
36.22
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
Fully vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2016
|
6,509
|
|
|
$
|
36.22
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
4,487
|
|
|
$
|
38.16
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
The following table summarizes the total intrinsic value of options exercised and the cash received by the Company from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
Cash received from option exercises
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
Tax benefit realized from option exercises
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
$24 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option grants. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.2
years.
Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units
The Teradata SIP provides for the issuance of restricted shares, as well as restricted share units. These grants consist of both service-based and performance-based awards. Service-based awards typically vest over a
three
year period beginning on the effective date of grant. These grants are not subject to future performance measures. The cost of these awards, determined to be the fair market value at the date of grant, is expensed ratably over the vesting period. For substantially all restricted share grants, at the date of grant, the recipient has all rights of a stockholder, subject to certain restrictions on transferability and a risk of forfeiture. A recipient of restricted share units does not have the rights of a stockholder and is subject to restrictions on transferability and risk of forfeiture. For both restricted share grants and restricted share units, any potential dividend rights would be subject to the same vesting requirements as the underlying equity award. As a result, such rights are considered a contingent transfer of value and consequently these equity awards are not considered participating securities. Performance-based grants are subject to future performance measurements over a
one
-to
four
-year period. All performance-based shares that are earned in respect of an award will become vested at the end of the performance and/or service period provided the employee is continuously employed by the Company and applicable performance measures and other vesting conditions are met. The fair value of each performance-based award is determined on the grant date, based on the Company’s stock price, and assumes that performance targets will be achieved. Over the performance period, the number of shares of stock that will be issued is adjusted upward or downward based upon management’s assessment of the probability of achievement of performance targets. The ultimate number of shares issued and the related compensation cost recognized as expense will be based on a comparison of the final achievement of performance metrics to the specified targets.
65
The following table reports restricted shares and restricted share unit activity during the year ended
December 31, 2016
:
|
Shares in thousands
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
per Share
|
|||
|
Unvested shares at January 1, 2016
|
4,146
|
|
|
$
|
38.58
|
|
|
Granted
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
|
Vested
|
(1,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
38.09
|
|
|
Forfeited/canceled
|
(701
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.75
|
|
|
Unvested shares at December 31, 2016
|
4,042
|
|
|
$
|
31.57
|
|
The following table summarizes the weighted-average fair value of restricted share units granted for Teradata equity awards and the total fair value of shares vested.
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Weighted-average fair value of restricted share units granted
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
|
$
|
32.82
|
|
|
$
|
44.39
|
|
|
Total fair value of shares vested (in millions)
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
$86 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted share grants. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of
2.3 years
.
The following table represents the composition of Teradata restricted share unit grants in
2016
:
|
Shares in thousands
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
|||
|
Service-based shares
|
1,566
|
|
|
$
|
27.73
|
|
|
Performance-based shares
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
23.90
|
|
|
Total stock grants
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
26.61
|
|
In 2012, approximately
0.3 million
shares of the performance awards issued included challenging or “stretch” financial goals through 2016 based on a GAAP revenue and/or non-GAAP earnings per share targets in 2016. Each recipient’s opportunity to earn the award is based on performance over a
four
-year period ending in 2016. There was
no
compensation expense related to these awards recorded in
2016
as the performance targets for these awards were not achieved.
Performance-based share units granted as part of our long-term incentive program for certain corporate officers and key executives will be earned based on Teradata's total shareholder return ("TSR") over a
three
-year performance period relative to the other companies in the S&P 1500 Technology Index. The number of shares actually issued, as a percentage of the amount subject to the performance share award, could range from
0%
to
200%
. The grant date fair value of the non-vested performance-based awards was determined through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation model, which utilized multiple input variables that determined the probability of satisfying the market condition requirements applicable to each award. The compensation expense for the award will be recognized as long as the requisite service is rendered, regardless of whether the market conditions are achieved.
Modifications
In connection with the plan to exit most of the marketing applications business and the departure of certain executives, the Company modified its awards for certain employees to accelerate the vesting of any unvested awards at the date of sale. This modification resulted in a Type III modification (improbable to probable). In addition, a modification to extend the exercise period of all vested options from
59 days
to one year resulted in a Type I modification (probable to probable). Related to the awards that were modified, the Company recognized a net increase in compensation expense of
$1 million
in
2016
.
66
Employee Stock Purchase Program
The Company’s ESPP, effective on
October 1, 2007
, and as amended effective as of
January 1, 2013
, provides eligible employees of Teradata and its designated subsidiaries an opportunity to purchase the Company’s common stock at a discount to the average of the highest and lowest sale prices on the last trading day of each month. The ESPP discount was
15%
of the average market price and is considered compensatory.
Employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to
10%
of eligible compensation for common stock purchases. A total of
4 million
shares were authorized to be issued under the ESPP, with approximately
1.0 million
shares remaining under that authorization at
December 31, 2016
. The shares of Teradata common stock purchased by a participant on an exercise date (the last day of each month), for all purposes, are deemed to have been issued and sold at the close of business on such exercise date. Prior to that time, none of the rights or privileges of a stockholder exists with respect to such shares. Employee purchases and aggregate cost were as follows at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Employee share purchases
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|||
|
Aggregate cost
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Note 6 Employee Benefit Plans
Pension and Postemployment Plans.
Teradata currently sponsors defined benefit pension plans for certain of its international employees. For those international pension plans for which the Company holds asset balances, those assets are primarily invested in common/collective trust funds (which include publicly traded common stocks, corporate and government debt securities, real estate indirect investments, cash or cash equivalents) and insurance contracts.
Postemployment obligations relate to benefits provided to involuntarily terminated employees and certain inactive employees after employment but before retirement. These benefits are paid in accordance with various foreign statutory laws and regulations, and Teradata’s established postemployment benefit practices and policies. Postemployment benefits may include disability benefits, supplemental unemployment benefits, severance, workers’ compensation benefits, continuation of health care benefits and life insurance coverage, and are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis.
In 2016 the Company eliminated the accumulation of postemployment benefits based on service for the U.S. separation plan. As a result of this change, postemployment benefits for the U.S. will no longer be accounted for using actuarial models.
Pension and postemployment benefit costs for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
||||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Settlement charge
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Divestiture
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total costs
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
67
The underfunded amount of pension and postemployment obligations is recorded as a liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The following tables present the changes in benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and the reconciliation of the funded status to amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and in accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31
:
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at January 1
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
Service cost
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
||||
|
Interest cost
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||
|
Plan participant contributions
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
5
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
12
|
|
|
20
|
|
||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
||||
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
||||
|
Divestiture
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Benefit obligation at December 31
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Company contributions
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Plan participant contribution
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
|
64
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Funded status (underfunded)
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Non-current assets
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
||||
|
Non-current liabilities
|
(60
|
)
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
||||
|
Net amounts recognized
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Unrecognized Net actuarial loss
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
Unrecognized Prior service (credit) cost
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
The following table presents the accumulated pension benefit obligation at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Accumulated pension benefit obligation
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
The following table presents pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
68
The following table presents the pre-tax net changes in projected benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) arising during the year
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
Amortization of loss included in net periodic benefit cost
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Prior service cost arising during the year
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Recognition of loss due to settlement
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency exchange
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during
2017
:
|
In millions
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
||||
|
Net loss to be recognized in other comprehensive income
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
The weighted-average rates and assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, and net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, were as follows:
|
|
Pension Benefit Obligations
|
|
Pension Benefit Cost
|
||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Discount rate
|
2.0%
|
|
2.4%
|
|
2.4%
|
|
2.3%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.3%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
3.3%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.3%
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
Postemployment
Benefit Obligations
|
|
Postemployment
Benefit Cost
|
||||||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Discount rate
|
3.4%
|
|
3.6%
|
|
3.4%
|
|
3.5%
|
|
3.8%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.0%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
3.7%
|
|
Involuntary turnover rate
|
2.0%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
2.0%
|
|
1.3%
|
|
1.0%
|
The Company determines the expected return on assets based on individual plan asset allocations, historical capital market returns, and long-term interest rate assumptions, with input from its actuaries, investment managers, and independent investment advisors. The company emphasizes long-term expectations in its evaluation of return factors, discounting or ignoring short-term market fluctuations. Expected asset returns are reviewed annually, but are generally modified only when asset allocation strategies change or long-term economic trends are identified.
The discount rate used to determine year-end
2016
U.S. benefit obligations was derived by matching the plans’ expected future cash flows to the corresponding yields from the Citigroup Pension Liability Index. This yield curve has been constructed to represent the available yields on high-quality fixed-income investments across a broad range of future maturities. International discount rates were determined by examining interest rate levels and trends within each country, particularly yields on high-quality long-term corporate bonds, relative to our future expected cash flows.
Gains and losses have resulted from changes in actuarial assumptions and from differences between assumed and actual experience, including, among other items, changes in discount rates and differences between actual and assumed asset returns. These gains and losses (except those differences being amortized to the market-related value) are only amortized to the extent that they exceed
10%
of the higher of the market-related value of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation of each respective plan.
69
Plan Assets.
The weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31,
by asset category are as follows:
|
|
Actual Asset Allocation
As of December 31
|
|
Target Asset
|
||
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Allocation
|
|
Equity securities
|
32%
|
|
31%
|
|
31%
|
|
Debt securities
|
42%
|
|
43%
|
|
46%
|
|
Insurance (annuity) contracts
|
17%
|
|
16%
|
|
17%
|
|
Real estate
|
7%
|
|
6%
|
|
3%
|
|
Other
|
2%
|
|
4%
|
|
3%
|
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Fair Value.
Fair value measurements are established utilizing a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are more fully described in Note 9.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension assets as of
December 31, 2016
.
Common/collective trust funds (which include money market funds, equity funds, bond funds, real-estate indirect investments, etc.)
: Valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) of shares held by the Plan at year end, as reported to the Plan by the trustee, which represents the fair value of shares held by the Plan. Because the NAV of the shares held in the common/collective trust funds are derived by the value of the underlying investments, the Company has classified these underlying investments as Level 2 fair value measurements.
Insurance contracts:
Valued by discounting the related future benefit payments using a current year-end market discount rate, which represents the fair value of the insurance contract. The Company has classified these contracts as Level 3 assets for fair value measurement purposes.
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the pension plan assets at fair value as of
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||
|
In millions
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Equity funds
|
21
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Bond/fixed-income funds
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Real-estate indirect investments
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Insurance contracts
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
||||
|
Total Assets at fair value
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
70
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the pension plan level 3 assets for the year ended
December 31, 2016
:
|
In millions
|
Insurance
Contracts
|
||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Purchases, sales and settlements, net
|
1
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
$
|
11
|
|
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the pension plan assets at fair value as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||
|
In millions
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Equity funds
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Bond/fixed-income funds
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Real-estate indirect investments
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Insurance contracts
|
10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
||||
|
Total assets at fair value
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the pension plan level 3 assets for the year ended
December 31, 2015
:
|
In millions
|
Insurance
Contracts
|
||
|
Balance as of January 1, 2015
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
Purchases, sales and settlements, net
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
$
|
10
|
|
Investment Strategy.
Teradata employs a number of investment strategies across its various international pension plans. In some countries, particularly where Teradata does not have a large employee base, the Company may use insurance (annuity) contracts to satisfy its future pension payment obligations, whereby the Company makes pension plan contributions to an insurance company in exchange for which the pension plan benefits will be paid when the members reach a specified retirement age or on earlier exit of members from the plan. In other countries, the Company may employ local asset managers to manage investment portfolios according to the investment policies and guidelines established by the Company, and with consideration to individual plan liability structure and local market environment and risk tolerances. The Company’s investment policies and guidelines primarily emphasize diversification across and within asset classes to maximize long-term returns subject to prudent levels of risk, with the overall objective of enabling the plans to meet their future obligations. The investment portfolios contain a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across domestic and international stocks, small and large capitalization stocks, and growth and value stocks. Fixed-income assets are diversified across government and corporate bonds. Where applicable, real estate investments are made through real estate securities, partnership interests or direct investment, and are diversified by property type and location.
Cash Flows Related to Employee Benefit Plans
Cash Contributions.
The Company expects to contribute approximately
$5 million
to the international pension plans, in 2017.
71
Estimated Future Benefit Payments.
The Company expects to make the following benefit payments reflecting past and future service from its pension and postemployment plans:
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postemployment
|
||||
|
In millions
|
Benefits
|
|
Benefits
|
||||
|
Year
|
|
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
2018
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
2019
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
2020
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
2021
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
2022-2026
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Savings Plans.
U.S. employees and many international employees participate in defined contribution savings plans. These plans generally provide either a specified percent of pay or a matching contribution on participating employees’ voluntary elections. The Company’s matching contributions typically are subject to a maximum percentage or level of compensation. Employee contributions can be made pre-tax, after-tax or a combination thereof. The following table identifies the expense for the U.S. and International subsidiary savings plans for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
U.S. savings plan
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
International subsidiary savings plans
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Note 7 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As a portion of the Company’s operations and revenue occur outside the U.S. and in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company is exposed to potential gains and losses from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In an attempt to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations, the Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge transactional exposures resulting predominantly from foreign currency denominated inter-company receivables and payables. The forward contracts are designated as fair value hedges of specified foreign currency denominated inter-company receivables and payables and generally mature in three months or less. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it hold or issue leveraged derivative instruments. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in exchange rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk. The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of the applicable contracts.
All derivatives are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value. The fair values of foreign exchange contracts are based on market spot and forward exchange rates and represent estimates of possible value that may not be realized in the future. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability, are recorded in current period earnings. The notional amounts represent agreed-upon amounts on which calculations of dollars to be exchanged are based, and are an indication of the extent of Teradata’s involvement in such instruments. These notional amounts do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, therefore, are not a measure of the instruments. Across its portfolio of contracts, Teradata has both long and short positions relative to the U.S. dollar. As a result, Teradata’s net involvement is less than the total contract notional amount of the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts.
72
The following table identifies the contract notional amount of the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts at
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Contract notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
Net contract notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
The fair value derivative assets and liabilities recorded in other current assets and accrued liabilities at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, were not material.
Gains and losses from the Company’s fair value hedges (foreign currency forward contracts and related hedged items) were immaterial for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
. Gains and losses from foreign exchange forward contracts are fully recognized each period and reported along with the offsetting gain or loss of the related hedged item, either in cost of products or in other income, depending on the nature of the related hedged item.
Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits, governmental investigations, claims and other matters, including those that relate to the environment, health and safety, employee benefits, export compliance, intellectual property, tax matters, and other regulatory compliance and general matters.
Guarantees and Product Warranties.
Guarantees associated with the Company’s business activities are reviewed for appropriateness and impact to the Company’s financial statements. Periodically, the Company’s customers enter into various leasing arrangements coordinated with a leasing company. In some instances, the Company guarantees the leasing company a minimum value at the end of the lease term on the leased equipment. As of
December 31, 2016
, the maximum future payment obligation of this guaranteed value and the associated liability balance was
$4 million
.
The Company provides its customers a standard manufacturer’s warranty and records, at the time of the sale, a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time, travel time, number of service calls and cost of replacement parts. For each consummated sale, the Company recognizes the total customer revenue and records the associated warranty liability using pre-established warranty percentages for that product class.
The following table identifies the activity relating to the warranty reserve liability for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Beginning balance at January 1
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
16
|
|
|||
|
Settlements (in cash or kind)
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
The Company also offers extended and/or enhanced coverage to its customers in the form of maintenance contracts. The Company accounts for these contracts by deferring the related maintenance revenue over the extended and/or enhanced coverage period. Costs associated with maintenance support are expensed as incurred. Amounts associated with these maintenance contracts are not included in the table above.
In addition, the Company provides its customers with certain indemnification rights. In general, the Company agrees to indemnify the customer if a third party asserts patent or other infringement on the part of the customer for its use of the Company’s products. The Company has indemnification obligations under its charter and bylaws to its officers and directors, and has entered into indemnification agreements with the officers and directors of its subsidiaries. From time to time, the Company also enters into agreements in connection with its acquisition and divesture activities that include indemnification obligations by the Company, including the sale of the marketing applications business. The fair value of these indemnification obligations is typically not readily determinable due to the conditional nature of the Company’s potential obligations and the specific facts and circumstances involved with each particular agreement. As such, the Company has generally not recorded a liability in connection with these
73
indemnification arrangements. Historically, payments made by the Company under these types of agreements have not had a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Leases.
Teradata conducts certain of its sales and administrative operations using leased facilities, the initial lease terms of which vary in length. Many of the leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses that are not material to the overall lease portfolio. Future minimum operating lease payments and committed subleases under non-cancelable leases as of
December 31, 2016
, for the following fiscal years were:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
In millions
|
Amounts
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021 and Thereafter
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating lease obligations
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
Sublease rentals
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total committed operating leases less sublease rentals
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
The following table represents the Company’s actual rental expense and sublease rental income for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Rental expense
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
Sublease rental income
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
The Company had no contingent rentals for these periods.
Concentrations of Risk.
The Company is potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk on accounts receivable and financial instruments such as hedging instruments, and cash and cash equivalents. Credit risk includes the risk of nonperformance by counterparties. The maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized on the balance sheet. Exposure to credit risk is managed through credit approvals, credit limits, selecting major international financial institutions (as counterparties to hedging transactions) and monitoring procedures. Teradata’s business often involves large transactions with customers, and if one or more of those customers were to default in its obligations under applicable contractual arrangements, the Company could be exposed to potentially significant losses. However, management believes that the reserves for potential losses were adequate at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
.
The Company is also potentially subject to concentrations of supplier risk. Our hardware components are assembled exclusively by Flextronics International Ltd. (“Flextronics”). Flextronics procures a wide variety of components used in the manufacturing process on our behalf. Although many of these components are available from multiple sources, Teradata utilizes preferred supplier relationships to better ensure more consistent quality, cost and delivery. Typically, these preferred suppliers maintain alternative processes and/or facilities to ensure continuity of supply. Given the Company’s strategy to outsource its manufacturing activities to Flextronics and to source certain components from single suppliers, a disruption in production at Flextronics or at a supplier could impact the timing of customer shipments and/or Teradata’s operating results.
Note 9 Fair Value Measurements
Fair value measurements are established utilizing a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as significant other observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted prices in less-active markets for identical assets; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include money market funds and foreign currency exchange contracts. A portion of the Company’s excess cash reserves are held in money market funds which generate interest income based on the prevailing market rates. Money market funds are included in
74
cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s balance sheet. Money market fund holdings are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizes its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of derivative financial instruments, specifically, forward foreign exchange contracts. The fair value of these contracts are measured at the end of each interim reporting period using observable inputs other than quoted prices, specifically market spot and forward exchange rates. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Fair value gains for open contracts are recognized as assets and fair value losses are recognized as liabilities. The fair value derivative assets and liabilities recorded in other current assets and accrued liabilities at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, were not material. Any realized gains or losses would be mitigated by corresponding gains or losses on the underlying exposures. Further information on the Company’s use of forward foreign exchange contracts is included in Note 7.
The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to fair value disclosure requirements at
December 31,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||
|
In millions
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||
|
In millions
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Note 10 Debt
Teradata's
$600 million
term loan is payable in quarterly installments, which commenced on March 31, 2016, with all remaining principal due in March 2020. The outstanding principal amount under the term loan agreement bears interest at a floating rate based upon a negotiated base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus a margin based on the leverage ratio of the Company. As of
December 31, 2016
, the term loan principal outstanding was
$570 million
and carried an interest rate of
2.1875%
. Unamortized deferred issuance costs of approximately
$2 million
are being amortized over the
five
-year term of the loan. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2016.
Annual contractual maturities of principal on term loan outstanding at
December 31, 2016
, are as follows:
75
The following table presents interest expense on borrowings for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Teradata’s term loan is recognized on the Company’s balance sheet at its unpaid principal balance, and is not subject to fair value measurement. However, given that the loan carries a variable rate, the Company estimates that the unpaid principal balance of the term loan would approximate its fair value. If measured at fair value in the financial statements, the Company’s term loan would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Teradata's revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) has a borrowing capacity of $
400 million
. The Credit Facility ends on March 25, 2020 at which point any remaining outstanding borrowings would be due for repayment unless extended by agreement of the parties for up to
two
additional
one
-year periods. The interest rate charged on borrowings pursuant to the Credit Facility can vary depending on the interest rate option the Company chooses to utilize and the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. In the near term, Teradata would anticipate choosing a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Credit Facility is unsecured and contains certain representations and warranties, conditions, affirmative, negative and financial covenants, and events of default customary for such facilities. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company had
no
borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, leaving $
400 million
in additional borrowing capacity available. Unamortized deferred costs on the original credit facility and new lender fees of approximately
$1 million
are being amortized over the
five
-year term of the credit facility. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of
December 31, 2016
.
Note 11 Segment, Other Supplemental Information and Concentrations
Effective
January 1, 2016
, Teradata implemented an organizational change in which it decided to manage the Company's business under
two
g
eographic regions and the marketing applications division (prior to its completed sale on July 1, 2016); which are also the Company’s operating segments: (1) Americas Data and Analytics (North America and Latin America); (2) International Data and Analytics (Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Japan); and (3) Marketing Applications. Effective July 1, 2016, following the sale of the marketing applications business, Teradata is managing its business in
two
operating segments: (1) Americas region (North America and Latin America); and (2) International region (Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Japan). For purposes of discussing results by segment, management excludes the impact of certain items, consistent with the manner by which management evaluates the performance of each segment. This format is useful to investors because it allows analysis and comparability of operating trends. It also includes the same information that is used by Teradata management to make decisions regarding the segments and to assess financial performance. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of the segments based on revenue and multiple profit measures, including segment gross margin. For management reporting purposes assets are not allocated to the segments. Prior period segment information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
76
The following table presents segment revenue and segment gross margin for the Company for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Segment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Americas Data and Analytics
|
$
|
1,334
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
|
International Data and Analytics
|
919
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|||
|
Total Data and Analytics
|
2,253
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
|||
|
Marketing Applications
|
69
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
164
|
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
2,322
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|||
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Americas Data and Analytics
|
754
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
917
|
|
|||
|
International Data and Analytics
|
425
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
523
|
|
|||
|
Total Data and Analytics
|
1,179
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|||
|
Marketing Application
|
33
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
76
|
|
|||
|
Total segment gross margin
|
1,212
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
14
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
11
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets
|
2
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
21
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition, integration and reorganization-related costs
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
5
|
|
|||
|
Total gross margin
|
1,188
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
664
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
770
|
|
|||
|
Research and development expenses
|
212
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
206
|
|
|||
|
Impairment of goodwill, acquired intangibles and other assets
|
80
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
The following table presents revenue by product and services revenue for the Company for the years ended December 31:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Products (software and hardware)
(1)
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
Consulting services
|
730
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
817
|
|
|||
|
Maintenance services
|
703
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
688
|
|
|||
|
Total services
|
1,433
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our analytic database software and hardware products are often sold and delivered together in the form of a “node” of capacity as an integrated technology solution. Accordingly, it is impracticable to provide the breakdown of revenue from various types of software and hardware products.
|
The following table presents revenues by geographic area for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
|
$
|
1,428
|
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
|
Americas (excluding United States)
|
123
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
161
|
|
|||
|
International
|
953
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
The following table presents property and equipment by geographic area at
December 31
:
77
|
In millions
|
2016
|
|
2015
(1)
|
||||
|
United States
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
Americas (excluding United States)
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
||
|
International
|
21
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
(1) 2015 amounts include property and equipment held for sale for
$12 million
.
Concentrations.
No single customer accounts for more than 10% of the Company's revenue
. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Company is not aware of any significant concentration of business transacted with a particular customer that could, if suddenly eliminated, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. The Company's hardware components are assembled exclusively by Flextronics. In addition, the Company utilizes preferred supplier relationships to better ensure more consistent quality, cost and delivery. There can be no assurances that a disruption in production at Flextronics or at a supplier would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.
Note 12 Business Combinations and Other Investment Activities
During
2016
, the Company completed
one
immaterial business acquisition, which complements and strengthens the Company's global portfolio, and released hold-back amounts from several prior-year acquisitions for
$16 million
. The Company also sold the marketing applications business on July 1, 2016 (see Note 15).
During
2015
, the Company completed
two
immaterial business acquisitions for
$17 million
, which complemented and strengthened the Company's global portfolio. One of the acquisitions pertained to the marketing applications business, which the Company exited on July 1, 2016 and therefore was classified in the assets held for sale (see Note 15) as of December 31, 2015. In addition, the Company sold
two
equity investments for
$85 million
and recognized a gain of
$57 million
.
During 2014, the Company completed
six
immaterial business acquisitions and other equity investments for
$69 million
. These acquisitions complemented and strengthened the Company's global portfolio.
Two
of these acquisitions pertained to the marketing applications business. In addition, the Company recognized a loss of
$9 million
in an equity investment arising from an impairment of carrying value.
Note 13 Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The following table provides information on changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of tax, for the years ended
December 31
:
|
In millions
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
Defined
benefit
plans
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
|
|
Total
AOCI
|
||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
|
31
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(38
|
)
|
||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||||
|
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
|
31
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(49
|
)
|
||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
(26
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
||||
|
Net other comprehensive loss
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(72
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
||||
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
||||
|
Net other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
78
The following table presents the impact and respective location of AOCI reclassifications in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31:
|
In millions
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
AOCI Component
|
|
Location
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
Other income
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Tax portion
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total reclassifications
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Further information on the Company’s defined benefit plans is included in Note 6.
Note 14 Reorganization and Business Transformation
In the
fourth
quarter of
2015
the Company announced a plan to realign Teradata’s business by reducing its cost structure and focusing on the Company’s core data and analytics business. This business transformation includes exiting the marketing applications business (see Note 15), rationalizing costs, and modifying the Company’s go-to-market approach. The Company incurred the following costs related to these actions for the years ended December 31:
|
In millions
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
||||
|
Employee severance and other employee related cost
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
Asset write-downs
|
|
80
|
|
|
140
|
|
||
|
Professional services, legal and other associated cost
|
|
35
|
|
|
8
|
|
||
|
Total reorganization and business transformation cost
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
The charges for asset write-downs were for non-cash write-downs of goodwill, acquired intangibles and other assets (see Note 15). In addition to the costs and charges incurred above, the Company made cash payments of
$20 million
in 2016 and
$14 million
in 2015 for employee severance that did not have a material impact on its Statement of Operations due to Teradata accounting for its postemployment benefits under
Accounting Standards Codification 712
,
Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits
(“ASC 712”), which uses actuarial estimates and defers the immediate recognition of gains or losses. Because the Company accounts for postemployment benefits under
ASC 712
, it did not record any liability associated with
ASC 420
,
Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations
.
Note 15 Impairment and Sale of the Marketing Applications Business
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually in the
fourth
quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company determined that indicators were present in the marketing applications business which would suggest the fair value may have declined below the carrying value. The indicators were primarily lower than forecasted revenue and profitability levels for 2015 and future periods. Based on our analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill was substantially lower than the carrying value of goodwill. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$340 million
during the second quarter of 2015.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company committed to a plan to exit the marketing applications business. The assets and liabilities for this business, which were included within our marketing applications segment, were classified as held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 and, therefore, the corresponding depreciation and amortization expense ceased at that time. The divestiture was not presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements because it did not have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. The Company then performed a goodwill impairment analysis of the business to be disposed of. As a result of this analysis, the Company recognized an additional goodwill impairment of
$97 million
in the fourth quarter of 2015. In addition, acquired intangible assets were reduced by
$41 million
to adjust the carrying amount of the disposal group's net assets and liabilities down to its fair value less cost to sell.
79
On April 22, 2016, the Company entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with TMA Solutions, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership and affiliate of Marlin Equity Partners (“Marlin Equity”), to sell the marketing applications business for
$90 million
in cash, subject to a post-closing adjustment for working capital, debt and other metrics. We recognized an impairment of goodwill of $
57 million
and acquired intangibles of
$19 million
in the first quarter of 2016 to adjust the carrying value of the net assets of our marketing applications business to fair value less cost to sell.
P
rior to the sale that occurred on July 1, 2016, the marketing applications business that was classified as held for sale generated revenue of
$69 million
and an operating loss of
$112 million
(which includes loss from impairment of goodwill and acquired intangibles of
$76 million
) for the six months ended June 30, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company generated revenue of
$153 million
and an operating loss of
$561 million
(which includes loss from impairment of goodwill and acquired intangibles of
$478 million
). The net assets held for sale as of July 1, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:
|
In millions
|
At July 1, 2016
|
|
At December 31, 2015
|
||||
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Account receivable, net
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
Other current asset
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
||
|
Total current assets held for sale
|
37
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
|
Goodwill
|
57
|
|
|
113
|
|
||
|
Acquired intangibles, net
|
25
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
Other assets
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
|
Total assets held for sale
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Account payable
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Payroll and benefit liabilities
|
4
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
|
Deferred Revenue
|
28
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
Other current liabilities
|
2
|
|
|
5
|
|
||
|
Total current liabilities held for sale
|
38
|
|
|
57
|
|
||
|
Other liabilities
|
5
|
|
|
1
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities held for sale
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
O
n July 1, 2016, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Teradata completed the sale of Teradata’s marketing applications business to Marlin Equity. The purchase price received for this business was approximately
$92
million in cash, subject to a post-closing adjustment for working capital, debt and other metrics. Transaction costs and post-closing obligations were approximately
$5 million
. Upon completion of the divestiture of the held for sale assets in July 2016, no material gain or loss was recognized as the carrying value of the held for sale assets was equal to the purchase price received less costs to sell.
The Company recorded tax expense of approximately
$22 million
in the third quarter of 2016 related to this transaction. The total tax expense, of which
$14 million
is cash taxes due to having zero tax basis in goodwill, was calculated based on the amount of proceeds allocated to the various jurisdictions in accordance with the Purchase Agreement at the local statutory rates. The tax expense reported in the third quarter of 2016 is subject to change pending finalization of the working capital, transaction costs and other adjustments.
In connection with the closing of the transaction, the parties entered into a transition services agreement, pursuant to which Teradata will provide certain services to Marlin Equity, including accounting, human resources, order processing and invoicing and information technology services for a service period of up to 15 months after the closing of the transaction.
80
Note 16 Quarterly Information (unaudited)
|
In millions, except per share amounts
|
First
(1)
|
|
Second
(2)
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
(3)
|
||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
623
|
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
(262
|
)
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
(1.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
(1) Loss from operation for the three months ended March 31, 2016 includes
goodwill and acquired intangibles impairment charges of
$76 million
for the marketing application business.
(2) Loss from operations for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2015
includes a goodwill impairment charge of
$340 million
for the
marketing applications
business.
(3) Loss from operations for the three months ended December 31, 2015 includes goodwill and acquired intangibles impairment charges of
$138 million
for the marketing applications business.
|
Item 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
Item 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Teradata maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information
81
is accumulated and communicated to management, including, as appropriate, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance as of December 31, 2016.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Teradata’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Teradata’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that Teradata’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
Teradata’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued their report on the effectiveness of Teradata’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which appears in this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
Item 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
Item 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required to be included in Part III Item 10 is set forth under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Additional Information Concerning the Board of Directors” in Teradata’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal 2016 year (the “2017 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference. The information under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is also incorporated by reference in this section.
82
|
Item 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
Information required to be included in Part III Item 11 is set forth under the captions “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Tables,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Compensation and Human Resource Committee” and “Board Compensation and Human Resource Committee Report on Executive Compensation” in Teradata’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
Item 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information required to be included in Part III Item 12 is set forth under the captions “Stock Ownership” in Teradata’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
Plan category
|
|
Number of
securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
||||||
|
|
|
(a)
(1)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
(2)
|
||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
$
|
6,508,759
|
|
|
$
|
36.22
|
|
|
$
|
9,732,983
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,508,759
|
|
|
$
|
36.22
|
|
|
$
|
9,732,983
|
|
(1) Column (a) represents the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options granted under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
(2) Column (c) represents the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and the Teradata Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, other than shares available for issuance in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options.
|
Item 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Information required to be included in Part III Item 13 is set forth under the captions “Related Person Transactions” and “Board Independence and Related Transactions” in Teradata’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
Item 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information required to be included in Part III Item 14 is set forth under the caption “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Teradata’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
83
PART IV
|
Item 15.
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
(a)
|
Index
|
1. Financial Statements: The consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm as set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report:
|
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedule: Financial Statement Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is included in this Annual Report on page 93. All other schedules are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable.
Exhibits: See Index of Exhibits below for a listing of all exhibits to this Annual Report.
(b) Exhibits identified in parentheses below, on file with the SEC, are incorporated herein by reference as exhibits hereto.
|
Reference
Number per Item
601 of
Regulation S-K
|
|
Description
|
|
2.1
|
|
Form of Separation and Distribution Agreement between Teradata Corporation and NCR Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2007 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Teradata Corporation as amended and restated on September 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2007 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Teradata Corporation, as amended and restated on July 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Common Stock Certificate of Teradata Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 13, 2007 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between Teradata Corporation and NCR Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC file number 001-00395) filed by NCR Corporation on September 25, 2007).
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Technology Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Teradata Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated on January 31, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated August 3, 2012).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Teradata Corporation Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Teradata Change in Control Severance Plan, as amended and restated on January 30, 2017 to be effective as of February 1, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Teradata Executive Severance Plan, effective as of February 1, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Amended and Restated Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, dated February 3, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for awards granted in 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.1*
|
|
Form of 2008 Stock Option Agreement under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, approved November 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2007 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.2*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2008 and November 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 2, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.3*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 29, 2010 and November 28, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 1, 2011).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.4*
|
|
Form of 2007 Director Option Grant Statement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 3, 2008 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.5*
|
|
Form of 2008 Director Option Grant Statement under the Teradata Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 15, 2008 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.6*
|
|
Teradata Corporation Director Compensation Program, Amended and Restated, effective on April 26, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated August 8, 2011 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of February 22, 2016) (incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement of Teradata Corporation filed with the SEC on March 4, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on April 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2012).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.1*
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Share Unit Grant Statement under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated August 3, 2012).
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.2*
|
|
Form of Special 2016 Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on February 26, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2013).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.3*
|
|
Form of Special Long-Term Strategic Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on February 26, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2013).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.4*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.5*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.6*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.7*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.8*
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.9*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.10*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.11*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.12*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.13*
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.14*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.15*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
10.10.16*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.17*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.18*
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.19*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (Marketing Applications Division) Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.20*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Non-U.S. Employees (Marketing Applications Division) Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on December 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.21
|
|
Form of Relative TSR Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on February 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.21 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.22
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Share Unit Grant Statement under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on April 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.23*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.24*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.25*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.26*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreements For Non-U.S. Employees Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.27*
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.28*
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Relative TSR Award), approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
10.10.29*
|
|
Form of CEO Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (2017 Performance Period Award), approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.30*
|
|
Form of CEO Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement Under the Teradata 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Relative TSR Award), approved on November 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Purchase and Manufacturing Services Agreement, effective April 27, 1998, by and between NCR Corporation and Solectron Corporation, now known as Flextronics International Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to NCR Corporation’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 001-00395) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Manufacturing Services Agreement, dated January 29, 2000, between NCR Corporation and Solectron Corporation, now known as Flextronics International Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Offer Letter to Michael Koehler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Michael Koehler, dated October 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2008 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12.2*
|
|
Agreement dated as of May 5, 2016 between Michael F. Koehler and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2016.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13*
|
|
Offer Letter to Stephen Scheppmann (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registration Statement on Form 10).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Stephen Scheppmann, dated October 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2008 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Robert Fair dated September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Robert Fair effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14.2*
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of August 1, 2016 between Robert Fair and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Daniel Harrington dated September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
10.15.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Daniel Harrington effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (SEC file number 001-33458)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16*
|
|
Employment contract with Hermann Wimmer, effective as of January 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 28, 2013).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16.1*
|
|
Amendment Agreement to the Employment Contract with Hermann Wimmer, effective as of February 27, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16.2*
|
|
Amendment Letter Agreement to the Employment Contract with Hermann Wimmer, effective as of May 6, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 8, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17*
|
|
Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Saundra Davis dated September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Saundra Davis effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18*
|
|
Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Laura Nyquist dated September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to Laura Nyquist effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19*
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of August 1, 2016 between Rick Morton and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20*
|
|
Offer letter from Teradata Corporation to Suzanne Zoumaras dated September 14, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 3, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21*
|
|
Offer letter from Teradata Corporation to John Dinning dated August 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21.1*
|
|
Amendment to the Offer Letter from Teradata Corporation to John Dinning dated September 9, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
10.22*
|
|
Offer letter from Teradata Corporation to Oliver Ratzesberger dated June 11, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 25, 2015 among Teradata Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Citibank, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23.1
|
|
Second Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 28, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23.2
|
|
Third Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 28, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Term Loan Agreement dated as of March 25, 2015 among Teradata Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Citibank, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2015).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24.1
|
|
Second Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 28, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24.2
|
|
Third Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 28, 2016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, by and between Teradata Corporation and TMA Solutions, L.P., dated as of April 22 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 22, 2016).**
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Teradata Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) dated February 27, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) dated February 27, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated February, 27, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
101
|
|
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (vi) Financial Statement Schedule II, and (vii) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
*
|
Management contracts or compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements.
|
|
**
|
Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of any of the omitted schedules upon request by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
91
TERADATA CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In millions)
|
Column A
|
|
Column B
|
|
Column C
|
|
Column D
|
|
Column E
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
|
|
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
|
|
Additions
Charged
to Costs &
Expenses
|
|
Charged
to Other
Accounts
|
|
Deductions
|
|
Balance
at End of
Period
|
||||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2016*
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2015**
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
* Above amount included in the deductions within column D is
$5 million
of reserves transferred in the marketing application business sale.
** Above amounts include allowances classified as held for sale
.
92
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERADATA CORPORATION
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Date: February 27, 2017
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Stephen M. Scheppmann
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen M. Scheppmann
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Victor L. Lund
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Victor L. Lund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen M. Scheppmann
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Stephen M. Scheppmann
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James M. Ringler
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
James M. Ringler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lisa R. Bacus
|
|
Director
|
|
Lisa R. Bacus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Nancy E. Cooper
|
|
Director
|
|
Nancy E. Cooper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Cary T. Fu
|
|
Director
|
|
Cary T. Fu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael P. Gianoni
|
|
Director
|
|
Michael P. Gianoni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David E. Kepler
|
|
Director
|
|
David E. Kepler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John G. Schwarz
|
|
Director
|
|
John G. Schwarz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William S. Stavropoulos
|
|
Director
|
|
William S. Stavropoulos
|
|
|
Date: February 27, 2017
93
|
Item 16.
|
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
|
None.
94
