UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________
FORM 10 ‑Q
___________________________________
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
|
|
☒ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2017
OR
|
|
|
|
|
☐ |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-13419
__________________ __ ______________________________________
Lindsay Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________ __ ________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
47 ‑0554096 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2222 N. 111th Street, Omaha, Nebraska |
|
68164 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
402 ‑829-6800
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
________ _____________ _______________ ____ ________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer |
☒ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Non ‑accelerated filer |
☐ |
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company |
☐ |
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of December 18 , 2017, 10,721,402 share s of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
INDEX FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 | |
|
|
4 | |
|
|
5 | |
|
|
6 | |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
15 |
|
|
ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
21 |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
||
|
|
21 | |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
21 |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
22 | |
| 23 | ||
- 2 -
Part I – FINA NCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - Fin ancial Statements
- 3 -
- 4 -
- 5 -
- 6 -
Lin dsay Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 .
In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using U.S. GAAP. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation.
Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date. The standard provides a single model for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance. The ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of goods or services. The ASU will replace existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP and becomes effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted only in fiscal 2018. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment.
The Company is currently in the assessment phase, reviewing a representative sample of contracts, holding discussions with key stakeholders, and cataloging potential impacts on the Company’s operations, accounting policies, internal control over financial reporting, and financial statements. The Company has identified that the key changes in the ASU that could potentially impact the Company’s revenue recognition relates to the allocation of contract revenues between various products and services, the timing of when those revenues are recognized, and the deferral of incremental costs to obtain a contract. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the ASU on the consolidated statements of earnings, financial position, and financial statement disclosures, as well as the adoption method.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities arising from an operating lease on the balance sheet. Additionally, companies are permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The effective date of ASU No. 2016-02 will be the first quarter of fiscal 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 – Net Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards and other dilutive securities.
- 7 -
The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 :
Certain stock options and restricted stock units were excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied. In addition, the following table shows the securities excluded from the computation of earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
||
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
(Units and options in thousands) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
65 |
|
33 |
|
Stock options |
|
102 |
|
148 |
Note 4 – Income Taxes
It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 .
The Company recorded income tax expense of $1.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 33.5 percent and 34.6 percent for the fiscal year-to-date periods ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , respectively. The de crease i n the estimated annual effective income tax rate from November 2016 to November 201 7 primarily relates to the change in earnings mix among domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions.
Note 5 – Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following as of November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017 :
- 8 -
Note 6 – Long-Term Debt
The following table sets forth the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s long- term debt as of the dates shown:
Principal payments on the debt are due as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within |
|
$ in thousands |
|
|
1 year |
|
$ |
202 |
|
2 years |
|
|
206 |
|
3 years |
|
|
210 |
|
4 years |
|
|
214 |
|
5 years |
|
|
218 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
115,876 |
|
|
|
$ |
116,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 – Financial Derivatives
The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings. Fair values of derivative instruments are as follows:
Accumulated other comprehensive income included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $4.0 million, $6.5 million, and $3.9 million at November 30, 2017, November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.
- 9 -
Net Investment Hedging Relationships
The amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
||||
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
||
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
Foreign currency forward contracts, net of tax expense of $57 and $610 |
|
$ |
123 |
|
$ |
918 |
For the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively , which were included in other comprehensive income as part of a currency translation adjustment. There were no amounts recorded in the condensed cons olidated statements of earnings related to ineffectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts related to net investment hedges for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 .
At November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017 , the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts to sell 32.6 million Euro, 32.6 million Euro , and 32.8 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. At November 30, 2017, November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017, the Company had an outstanding foreign currency forward contract to sell 43.0 million South African Rand at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The Company generally does not elect hedge accounting treatment for derivative contracts related to future settlements of foreign denominated intercompany receivables and payables. If the Company does not elect hedge accounting treatment for a derivative, the Company carries the derivative at its fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet s and recognizes any subsequent changes in its fair value during a period through earnings in the condensed cons olidated statements of earnings . At November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017 , the Company had $6.2 million, $6.9 million, and $ 5.0 million, respectively, of U.S. dollar equivalent of foreign currency forward contracts outstanding that are not designated as hedging instruments.
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value , based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016, and August 31, 2017 , respectively. There were no transfers between any levels for the periods presented.
There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three months ended November 30, 2017 or November 30, 2016 .
- 10 -
Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company enters into arrangements that obligate it to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements. Additionally, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings, business disputes and other legal proceedings. The Company has established accruals for certain proceedings where those proceedings present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the time of determination. The Company believes that any such currently-pending proceedings are either covered by insurance or would not have a material effect on the business or its consolidated financial statements if decided in a manner that is unfavorable to the Company. Such proceedings are exclusive of environmental remediation matters which are discussed separately below.
Infrastructure Products Litigation
The Company is currently defending a number of product liability lawsuits arising out of vehicle collisions with highway barriers incorporating the Company’s X-Lite ® end terminal. Despite the September 2017 reversal of a sizable judgment against a competitor, the Company expects that the significant attention brought to the infrastructure products industry by the original judgment may lead to additional lawsuits being filed against the Company and others in the industry.
The Company intends to vigorously defend each of these allegations. The Company maintains insurance to mitigate the impact of adverse judgment exposures in the current product liability cases. Based on the information currently available to the Company, the Company does not believe that a loss is probable in any of these lawsuits; therefore, no accrual has been included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, because of the complexity and early stage of these lawsuits, the Company is unable to estimate a range of possible loss.
Environmental Remediation
In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered from 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic compounds in the soil and groundwater. To date, the remediation process has consisted primarily of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration.
In fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions. In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation of source area contamination and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount. In addition to this source area, the Company determined that volatile organic compounds also existed under one of the manufacturing buildings on the site. Due to the location, the Company had not yet determined the extent of these compounds or the extent to which they were contributing to groundwater contamination. Based on the uncertainty of the remediation actions that might be required with respect to this affected area, the Company believed that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs could not be made and accordingly were not accrued at that time.
In December 2014, the EPA requested that the Company prepare a feasibility study related to the site, including the area covered by the building, which resulted in a revision to the Company’s remediation timeline. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company accrued $1.5 million of incremental operating costs to reflect its updated timeline.
The Company began soil and groundwater testing in preparation for developing this feasibility study during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company completed its testing which clarified the extent of contamination, including the identification of a source of contamination near the manufacturing building that was not part of the area for which reserves were previously established. The Company, with the assistance of third-party environmental experts, developed and evaluated remediation alternatives, a proposed remediation plan, and estimated costs. Based on these estimates of future remediation and operating costs, the Company accrued an additional $13.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 and included the related expenses in general and administrative expenses in the condensed con solidated statements of earning s.
- 11 -
The current estimated aggregate accrued cost of $17.4 million is based on consideration of several remediation options that would use different technologies, each of which the Company believes could be successful in meeting the long-term regulatory requirements of the site. The Company participated in a preliminary meeting with the EPA and the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (the “NDEQ”) during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 to review remediation alternatives and proposed plans for the site and submitted its remedial alternatives evaluation report to the EPA in August 2016. The proposed remediation plan is preliminary and has not been approved by the EPA or the NDEQ. Based on guidance from third-party environmental experts and further discussions with the EPA and the NDEQ, the Company anticipates that a definitive plan will not be agreed upon until fiscal 2018 or later .
The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Costs are charged against the accrual in the period in which they are paid. While the Company believes the current accrual is a good faith estimate of the long-term cost of remediation at this site based on the preliminary analysis currently available, the estimate of costs and their timing could change as a result of a number of factors, including (1) EPA and NDEQ input on the proposed remediation plan and any changes which they may subsequently require, (2) refinement of cost estimates and length of time required to complete remediation and post-remediation operations and maintenance, (3) effectiveness of the technology chosen in remediation of the site as well as changes in technology that may become available in the future, and (4) unforeseen circumstances existing at the site. As a result of these factors, the actual amount of costs incurred by the Company in connection with the remediation of contamination of its Lindsay, Nebraska site could exceed the amounts currently accrued for this expense. While any revisions could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year, the Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.
The following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016 , and August 31, 2016:
Note 10 – Warranties
The following table provides the changes in the Company’s product warranties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
||||
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
||
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,411 |
|
$ |
7,443 |
|
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
1,001 |
|
Warranty claims paid during the period |
|
|
(1,688) |
|
|
(1,202) |
|
Changes in estimates |
|
|
8 |
|
|
330 |
|
Product warranty accrual balance, end of period |
|
$ |
8,187 |
|
$ |
7,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 – Share-Based Compensation
The Company’s current share-based compensation plans, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights, performance shares , and performance stock units to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense was $ 1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , respectively.
- 12 -
The following table illustrates the type and fair value of the share-based compensation awards granted during the three month periods ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 :
The RSUs granted during the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 consisted of 3,980 and 3,634 , respectively, of awards that will be settled in cash. The weighted average stock price on the date of the grant was $91.56 and $78.23 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The following table provides the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the stock options awarded during the three month periods ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 :
Note 12 – Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
August 31, |
|||
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|||
|
Other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
14,615 |
|
$ |
14,154 |
|
$ |
18,926 |
|
Warranties |
|
|
8,187 |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
8,411 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
6,166 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
4,096 |
|
Dealer related liabilities |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
Tax related liabilities |
|
|
3,218 |
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
2,813 |
|
Accrued environmental liabilities |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
2,095 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
10,167 |
|
|
9,112 |
|
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
48,875 |
|
$ |
51,866 |
|
$ |
55,119 |
Note 13 – Share Repurchases
There were no share s repurchased during the three months ended November 30, 2017 or November 30, 2016 i n accordance with the Company’s share repurchase program. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $63.7 million as of November 30, 2017.
Note 14 – Industry Segment Information
The Company manages its business activities in two reportable segments: irrigation and infrastructure. The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes includes general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment. There are no inter-segment sales included in the amounts disclosed. The Company had no single customer
- 13 -
who represented 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three and three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 .
Irrigation - This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations, controls, filtration solution s and machine-to-machine technology. The irrigation reporting segment consists of three operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.
Infrastructure – This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of moveable barriers, specialty barriers, crash cushions and end terminals, and road marking and road safety equipment; the manufacture and sale of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures; and the provision of outsourced manufacturing and production services. The infrastructure reporting segment consists of one operating segment.
- 14 -
ITE M 2 ‑ Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Concerning Forward ‑Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 , as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations and planned financing of the Company. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, rep orts, on the Company's web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company. When used by or on behalf of th e Company, the words “expect,” “ ant icipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “ int end,” “will,” “plan,” “predict,” “ project, ” “outlook,” “could,” “ may, ” “ should ” or similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Executive Overview and Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 201 7 . Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 , as well as other risks and uncertainties not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company's financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.
Accounting Policies
In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.
The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 . Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical accountin g policies during the three months ended November 30, 2017 .
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Executive Overview and Outlook
Operating revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2017 were $124.5 million, an increase of 13 percent compared to $110.4 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 . Irrigation segment revenues in creased 15 percent to $103.4 million and infrastructure segment revenues increased three p ercent to $21.2 million . Net earnings for the three months ended November 30, 2017 were $3.2 million, or $0.30 per diluted share , compared to net earnings o f $0.9 million, or $0.08 p er diluted share , for the three months ended November 30, 2016 .
The Company’s irrigation revenues are highly dependent upon the need for irrigated agricultural crop production, which, in turn, depends upon many factors, including the following primary drivers:
|
|
· |
|
Agricultural commodity prices - As of November 2017, c orn prices have increased approximately five per cent while soybean prices have decreased approximately three percent f rom November 2016. Commodity prices, in general, continue to be constrained from rising following record 2016 and estimated 2017 harvests in the U.S. and continuing high stock levels . |
- 15 -
|
|
· |
|
Net farm income - As of November 2017 , the U.S. Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”) estimated U.S. 2017 net farm income to be $63.2 billion, up three percent from the USDA’s estimated U. S. 2016 net farm income of $61.5 billion. If the USDA’s estimate proves accurate , this would be the first increase in net farm income following three years of significant decline. |
|
|
· |
|
Weather conditions – Demand for irrigation equipment is often positively affected by storm damage and prolonged periods of drought conditions as producers look for ways to reduce the risk of low crop production and crop failures. Conversely, demand for irrigation equipment can be negatively affected during periods of more predictable or excessive natural precipitation. |
|
|
· |
|
Governmental policies - A number of governmental laws and regulations can affect the Company’s business, including: |
|
|
· |
|
The Agricultural Act of 2014 provides a degree of certainty to growers by adopting a five-year farm bill. This law continued many of the existing programs, including funding for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, which provides financial assistance to farmers to implement conservation practices, and is frequently used to assist in the purchase of center pivot irrigation systems. |
|
|
· |
|
Current tax incentives , such as the Section 179 income tax de duction and Section 168 bonus depreciation, are intended to encourage equipment purchases . These incentives could benefit equipment sales in the future. |
|
|
· |
|
Biofuel production continues to be a major demand driver for irrigated corn, sugar cane and soybeans as these crops are used in high volumes to produce ethanol and biodiesel. In November 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued Renewable Fuels Standard volume requirements for 2018 that maintain volume requirements similar to 20 17 levels . |
|
|
· |
|
Many international markets are affected by government policies such as subsidies and other agriculturally related incentives. While these policies can have a significant effect on individual markets, they typically do not have a material effect on the consolidated results of the Company. |
|
|
· |
|
Currency – The value of the U.S. dollar has been rising in relation to the value of currencies in a number of countries to which the Company exports products and in which the Company maintains local operations. The strengthening of the dollar increases the cost in the local currency of the products exported from the U.S. into these countries and, therefore, could negatively affect the Company’s international sales and margins. In addition, the U.S. dollar value of sales made in any affected foreign currencies will decline as the value of the dollar rises in relation to these other currencies. |
After a four year cyclical downturn in our U.S. irrigation business, indications are that the market has reached a level of stabilization. Stable commodity prices and net farm income, recalibration of farm input costs and general economic optimism have all contributed to improved grower sentiment towards investment in irrigation equipment. However, notable growth in demand for irrigation equipment is expected to remain constrained until there is more significant and sustained improvement in commodity prices and net farm income. International markets remain active with opportunities for further development and expansion, however regional political and economic factors, currency conditions and other factors can create a challenging environment. Additionally, international results are heavily dependent upon project sales which tend to fluctuate and can be difficult to forecast accurately.
- 16 -
The infrastructure business has continued to generate growth and profitability improvement in an environment of constrained government spending. In December 2015, the U.S. government enacted a five-year, $305 billion highway-funding bill to fund highway and bridge projects, the first long-term national transportation spending bill in a decade. In addition, the FHWA has changed highway safety product certification requirements. The change has required additional research and development spending and could have an impact on the competitive positioning of the Company’s highway safety products. In spite of government spending uncertainty, opportunities exist for market expansion in each of the infrastructure product lines. Demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved road safety.
As of November 30, 2017 , the Company had an order backlog of $80.3 million compared with $ 55.9 million at November 30, 2016 and $ 51.8 million at August 31, 2017 . The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts. Backlog typically represents long-term projects as well as short lead-time orders, and therefore is generally not a good indication of the next fiscal quarter’s revenues.
The global drivers for the Company’s markets of population growth, expanded food production, efficient water use and infrastructure expansion support the Company’s long-term growth goals. The most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is less developed and demand is driven primarily by food security, water scarcity and population growth.
- 17 -
Results of Operations
For the Three Months ended November 30, 2017 compared to the Three Months ended November 30, 2016
The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed cons olidated statements of earning s for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 . It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:
Revenues
Operating revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2017 increased 13 percent to $ 124.5 million from $ 110.4 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016, as irrigation revenues in creased $ 13.5 million and infrastructure revenues in creased $0.6 million . The irrigation segment provided 83 percent of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended November 30, 2017 as compared to 81 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2016 .
North America irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2017 of $ 67.8 million in creased $15.0 million, or 28 percent , from $ 52.8 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016. An increase in irrigation system sales volume reflected a more traditional fall selling season compared to the prior year. Revenues from other irrigation components increased modestly.
International irrigation revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2017 of $ 35.6 million de creased $1.5 million, or four percent , from $ 37.1 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016. The decrease resulted from a lower level of project sales while certain markets had higher sales compared to the prior year. The impact of foreign currency translation was insignificant.
Infrastructure segment revenues for the three months ended November 30, 2017 of $ 21.2 million in creased $0.7 million, or three percent , from $ 20.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016. The increase resulted from increased sales volume in road safety products and higher Road Zipper System® lease revenue were partially offset by lower revenue in other product lines.
- 18 -
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended November 30, 2017 of $ 32.4 million in creased 14 percent from $ 28.4 million for the three months ended November 30, 2016 . The increase in gross profit resulted from higher revenues as well as an increase in gross margin to 26.0 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2017 from 25.7 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2016 . Infrastructure segment margins improved due to a more favorable product mix within road safety products and an increase in higher margin lease revenue. In the irrigation segment, improved volume leverage from higher irrigation system sales was tempered by the impact of changes in product mix and changes in the regional mix of international sales.
Operating Expenses
O perating expenses of $ 26.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2017 increased by two percent over operating expenses of $25.6 million in the three months ended November 30, 2016. Operating expenses were 21.0 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2017 compared to 23.2 percent of sales for the three months ended November 30, 2016 .
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $1.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , respectively. The effective income tax rate was 33.5 percent and 34.6 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016, respectively. The de crease i n the effective income tax rate reflects anticipated changes in earnings mix among domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions for the full fiscal year.
On December 20, 2017, both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives passed reconciled U.S. tax reform legislation. If tax reform legislation is enacted, the Company estimates a decrease to tax expense primarily due to the lower blended effective U.S. federal tax rate for fiscal 2018, partially offset by the deemed repatriation of foreign income. The Company will continue to review and assess the potential impact of the legislation to the financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company's cash and cash equivalents totaled $ 109.5 million at November 30, 2017 compared with $ 103.1 million at November 30, 2016 and $ 121.6 million at August 31, 2017 . The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for dividends and share repurchases. The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under its credit arrangements described below. The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its continuing bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and dividends. The Company may require additional borrowings to fund potential acquisitions in the future.
The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries was approxima tely $26.1 million, $38.8 million, and $23.5 million as of November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016 , and August 31, 2017 , respectively. The Company considers earnings in foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested in those subsidiaries and would need to accrue and pay taxes if such earnings were repatriated to the United States. Accordingly, the Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity.
Net working capital was $ 206.1 million at November 30, 2017 , as compared with $ 190.3 million at November 30, 2016 and $200.9 million at August 31, 2017 . Cash used in operations totaled $5.0 million during the three months ended November 30, 2017 , a de crease of $ 13.1 million compared to cash provided by operations of $8.1 million during the three months ended November 30, 2016 . This de cr ease was primarily due to increased working capital to support higher sales .
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $ 3.0 million during the three months ended November 30, 2017 compared to $1.4 million used in investing activities during the three months ended November 30, 2016 . The in creas e is primarily attributable to an increase in capital spending and hedging activity . Capital spending was $ 2.0 million in the first three months of fiscal 2018 compared to capital spending of $ 1.4 million in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $ 4.0 million during the three months ended November 30, 2017 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $ 3.8 million during the three months ended November 30, 2016 . The in crease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due t o higher dividends paid in fiscal 2018 compared to the prior fiscal year .
Capital Allocation Plan
The Company’s capital allocation plan is to continue investing in revenue and earnings growth, combined with a defined process for enhancing returns to stockholders . Under the Company’s capital allocation plan, the priorities for uses of cash include:
|
|
· |
|
Investment in organic growth including capital expenditures and expansion of international markets, |
- 19 -
|
|
· |
|
Dividends to stockholders, along with expectations to increase dividends on an annual basis, |
|
|
· |
|
Synergistic acquisitions that provide attractive returns to stockholders, and |
|
|
· |
|
Opportunistic share repurchases taking into account cyclical and seasonal fluctuations. |
Capital Expenditures
Capi tal expenditures for fiscal 2018 are expected to be betw een $ 12 .0 million and $ 15 .0 million , including equipment replacement, manufacturing capacity expansion, and productivity improvements. The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.
Dividends
In the first quarter of fi scal 2018 , the Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per common share , or $3.2 million, to stockholders as compared to $0.29 per common share , or $3.1 million, in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 .
Share Repurchases
The Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $250.0 million of common stock with no expiration date. Under the program, shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions as well as under formalized trading plans in accordance with the guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. There were no shares repurchased during the three months ended November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016, respectively. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $ 63.7 million as of November 30, 2017 .
Long-Term Borrowing Facilities
Series A, Senior Notes. On February 19, 2015, the Company issued $115.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes, Series A (the “Senior Notes”). The entire principal of the Senior Notes is due and payable on February 19, 2030. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually at a fixed annual rate of 3.82 percent and borrowings under the Senior Notes are unsecured. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and dividends.
Revolving Credit Facility . On February 18, 2015, the Company entered into a $50 .0 million unsecured Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) . On February 28, 2017, the Company and Wells Fargo entered into an amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility which, among other things, extended the termination date of the agreement from February 18, 2018 to February 28, 2020. The Company intends to use borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility for working capital purposes and to fund acquisitions. At November 30, 2017 and November 30, 2016 , the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Facility is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo then outstanding. At November 30, 2017 , the Company had the ability to borrow up to $44.6 million under the Revolving Credit Facility , after consideration of outstanding standby letters of credit of $5.4 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points ( 2.27 percent at November 30, 2017 ), subject to adjustment as set forth in the loan documents for the Revolving Credit Facility. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility have equal priority with borrowings under the Company’s Senior Notes. Each of the credit arrangements described above include certain covenants relating primarily to the Company’s financial condition. These financial covenants include a funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts outstanding thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable. At November 30, 2017 , November 30, 2016 , and August 31, 2017 , the Company was in compliance with all financial loan covenants contained in its credit arrangements in place as of each of those dates.
Elecsys Series 2006A Bonds . Elecsys International Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has outstanding $1.9 million in principal amount of industrial revenue bonds that were issued in 2006 (the “Series 2006A Bonds”). Principal and interest on the Series 2006A Bonds are payable monthly through maturity on September 1, 2026. The interest rate is adjustable every five years based on the yield of the 5-year United States Treasury Notes, plus 0.45 percent ( 1.92 percent as of November 30, 2017 ). This rate was adjusted on September 1, 2016 in accordance with the terms of the bonds, and the adjusted rate will be in force until September 1, 2021. The obligations under the Series 2006A Bonds are secured by a first priority security interest in certain real estate.
- 20 -
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the f iscal year ended August 31, 2017 .
ITEM 3 – Qu antitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes from the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk previously disclosed in the Compa ny’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. See discussion of the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under Part II, Item 7A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ende d August 31, 2017 .
ITEM 4 – Con trols and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of November 30, 2017 .
Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
See the disclosure in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which disclosure is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. See the discussion of the Company’s risk factors under Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 .
IT EM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITE M 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
IT EM 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable .
None.
- 21 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 * |
|
Lindsay Corporation Management Incentive Plan (MIP) 2018 Plan Year. †** |
|
31.1 * |
|
|
|
31.2 * |
|
|
|
32.1 * |
|
|
|
101* |
|
Interactive Data Files. |
|
|
|
|
___________________________________
† M anagement contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto pursuant to Item 6 of Part II of Form 10-Q.
* Filed herein.
** Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text. This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commi ssion with the redacted text pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
- 22 -
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 21 th day of December 2017 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINDSAY CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ BRIAN L. KETCHAM |
|
|
|
Name: |
Brian L. Ketcham |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(on behalf of the registrant and as principal financial officer) |
|
- 23 -
Exhibit 10.1
LINDSAY CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (MIP)
201 8
Plan Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President/Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer /Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer/ Date |
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Purpose |
1 |
|
|
2. |
Definitions |
1 |
|
|
3. |
Effective Date |
2 |
|
|
4. |
Eligibility for Participation |
2 |
|
|
5. |
Enrollment in the Plan |
2&3 |
|
|
6. |
Determination of Target Payout Levels |
3&4 |
|
|
7. |
Basis of Awards |
4,5,&6 |
|
|
8. |
Changes in Employment Status |
6&7 |
|
|
9. |
Administration |
7 |
|
|
10. |
Attachments |
8 |
|
The purpose of the Management Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to:
|
|
· |
|
Encourage performance consistent with the Company’s business strategy . |
|
|
· |
|
Focus on near-term performance results as well as progress toward the achievement of long-term objectives . |
|
|
· |
|
Strengthen the link between performance and pay by delivering awards based on measurable corporate and individual goals . |
The terms used in this Plan have the meanings set forth below.
A. “Company” shall mean Lindsay Corporation .
B. “Compensation Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.
C. “ Financial Performance Component” shall mean the portion of a Participant’s Plan award that is based on the Company’s and specific Market financial performance as defined in Section 7B.
D. “Individual Performance Component” shall mean the portion of a Participant’s Plan award that is based on a Participant’s performance relative to individual objectives established in accordance with Section 7C.
E. "Named Executive Officers" shall mean the executives of the Company listed in the Executive Compensation section of the Company’s Proxy Statement , other executive officers of the Company for SEC reporting purposes and any other elected officers .
F. “Participant” shall mean a key employee eligible for awards under the terms outlined in Section 4 of this Plan.
G. “Plan” shall mean Lindsay Corporation Management Incentive Plan.
1
The Plan shall be effective as of September 1 , 201 7 and will be in effect for the 201 8 bonus year. The 201 8 bonus year is defined as September 1, 201 7 through August 31, 201 8 .
4. Eligibility for Participation
A. Participation in the Plan is limited to individuals in positions which have significant responsibility for and impact on the Company’s corporate performance.
B. Only the Chief Executive Officer and those employees in grades H through J (elected officers as noted in the annual report) are eligible to be considered for participation in the Plan.
C. Participation in the Plan does not guarantee or entitle any employee to participate in any bonus plan enacted in the future. Participation in the Plan at any target bonus level does not guarantee or entitle any employee to be eligible to participate at any similar target bonus level in any bonus plan which may be enacted in the future.
A. Initial Enrollment
At the beginning of the Plan year, each Participant must be enrolled in the Plan subject to the approvals and eligibility criteria set forth in Sections 4 and 6. The enrollment process is as follows:
i. Plan Participants will participate in the Plan at the standard target percent per grade level as listed in Section 6.
ii. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer will review the participant list and projected bonus costs of enrolled employees with the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee provides final approval on the aggregate potential cost of the Plan.
2
B. Mid-year Enrollment
When hiring or promoting employees during the Plan year who may be eligible for participation in the Plan, the following procedures must be followed:
i. Prior to the commencement of the recruiting or promotion process, the hiring manager consults with Human Resources to determine the position’s eligibility for participation in the Plan and the recommended target bonus amount.
ii. Offer letters indicating bonus Plan participation and target bonus award opportunities to new hires and/or promoted employees must be reviewed by the CEO or, in the case of a Named Executive Officer, by the Compensation Committee. Target bonus recommendations must be approved before communication to a prospective Participant. Generally, employees hired or promoted during the fourth quarter 201 8 are not eligible to participate in the 201 8 Plan.
6. Determination of Target Payout Levels
A. Incentive awards will be calculated as a percentage of the Participant’s annual base salary received during the Plan year , provided that annual base salary increases which are made during the first quarter of the Plan year will be treated for purposes of calculating a Participant’s bonus as if they had been made at the beginning of the Plan year . The impact of promotions or other adjustments to base pay made after the annual pay adjustment noted above will be prorated for the time in effect. While award amounts will vary based on the range of award opportunity and an assessment of individual performance results, the target award opportunities for each grade level are shown below:
i. Actual participation is subject to approval by the CEO and by the Compensation Committee. Actual participation is based on an assessment of the individual's position impact on the organization.
ii. Standard target percents per grade level should be followed for all Plan Participants.
B. If a Participant’s Plan target award opportunity (Target % of Salary as set forth above) changes due to promotion into a grade level with a higher target bonus, the Participant’s bonus will be calculated based on his or her annual salary during the Plan year and a pro-rated bonus award . The pro-rated bonus award will reflect the
3
portion of the Plan year spent in each grade level (e.g., 26 weeks at 40 % and 2 6 weeks at 50 %). In evaluating the performance of Participants who change positions during the Plan year, consideration will be giv en to the length of time and results in each position. Actual award decisions will be made by the CEO or, in the case of a Named Executive Officer, by the Compensation Committee. Generally, fourth quarter promotions will not result in an increase in a Participant’s target award opportunity.
C. Examples of various award calculations are included with this Plan document as Attachment A.
D. [Intentionally omitted.]
E. The Compensation Committee will determine the award payments to the Named Executive Officers.
F. Award payments will be calculated on an annual basis and paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll cycle. Payments will be made within 75 days following the Plan year. The payment date may be changed at any time and for any reason at the discretion of the CEO, or in the case of a Named Executive Officer, with approval of the Compensation Committee , but may not be later than March 15 following the end of the Plan year for which the award is paid .
A. Measurable performance objectives for each Plan Participant will be established at the beginning of the Plan year (or at mid-year for mid-year hires or newly eligible employees). In 201 8 , consideration will be given to:
i. Financial Performance Component: Company and Market financial performance vs. Plan performance objectives in accordance with Section 7B.
ii. Individual Performance Component: Participant’s performance relative to individual goals established in accordance with Section 7C.
4
iii. Individual and Financial Performance Components will be added to reach a Participant’s total bonus. The relative weighting will vary by grade in accordance with the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
Individual |
|
|
|
Grade |
Performance |
Performance |
|
|
|
CEO |
80% |
20% |
|
|
|
J |
80% |
20% |
|
|
|
I |
80% |
20% |
|
|
|
H |
80% |
20% |
|
B. At the beginning of the Plan year, the objectives for the Financial Performance Component are identified and approved by the Compensation Committee.
i. Recommended award amounts may range from 0 - 200% of the Financial Performance Component of the Participant’s target award, based on performance.
ii. Percentages between the threshold, intermediate, target, and maximum award will be interpolated.
iii. In the even t of an acquisition, revenue , operating income , expense s, fees , assets , l iabilities and acquisition fees resulting from the acquisition will be excluded from award payout calculations, unless the Compensation Committee approves a modification to include any such items .
iv. A ward payout calculations shall exclude the positive or negative impact of any adjustments to the accrual for environmental remediation liability or unbudgeted expenses related to the existing contamination at the Lindsay facility as disclosed in the Company’s SEC filings.
C. The Individual Performance Component will be based on written objectives set annually for Participants by their supervisors and approved by the CEO or, in the case of a Named Executive Officer, by the Compensation Committee. Objectives will be based on the Participant’s position and may be financial, operational or strategic.
i. Objectives under the Individual Performance Component may be linked to team-based goals, if appropriate
ii. Examples of appropriate objectives under the Individual Performance Component include:
|
|
· |
|
Safety |
|
|
· |
|
Customer Service |
|
|
· |
|
Market Share |
|
|
· |
|
On-time Delivery |
|
|
· |
|
Cost Reduction |
|
|
· |
|
Product Development |
5
iii. Recommended award amounts may range from 0% - 200% of the target amount under the Individual Performance Component. Recommended award amounts will be based on an assessment of the individual’s performance relative to objectives established under the Individual Performance Component, in accordance with the following guidelines:
iv. The “Payout (as % of Target Individual Performance Component)” represents the payout relative to target award for the Individual Performance Component of the Plan.
v. With respect to the CEO only, the CEO shall be entitled to an award amount equal to the maximum 200% of the target amount under his or her Individual Performance Component if the Company achieves at least $1 million of operating income in fiscal 201 8 . Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee shall have negative discretion to reduce such award amount to an amount calculated based on the CEO’s Individual Performance in a manner consistent with the assessment of the performance of other executives relative to objectives established under their respective Individual Performance Components.
8. Changes in Employment Status
A. Participants who cease to be employees of the Company during the Plan year will not be eligible to receive an award. Only active employees on the date that the bonus is paid will be eligible to receive an award . Any exceptions will require the approval of the CEO, or in the case of a Named Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee.
B. In the event that a Participant transfers out of an eligible position into an ineligible position within the Company, the employee may be eligible for a prorated bonus award based upon the approval of the CEO, or in the case of a Named Executive
6
Officer, the Compensation Committee.
C. In all cases awards will be calculated and paid according to the provisions in Section s 6 and 7 of this Plan document.
A. General authority for Plan administration and responsibility for ongoing Plan administration will rest with the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee has sole authority for decisions regarding interpretation of the terms of this Plan.
B. This plan is being adopted pursuant to and shall be subject to the terms of the Management Incentive Umbrella Plan as approved by stockholders on January 2 7 , 20 14 .
C. The Company reserves the right to amend or change the Plan in whole or in part at any time during the Plan year. Amendments to the Plan require the approval of the Compensation Committee.
D. Participation in the Plan does not constitute a contract of employment nor a contractual agreement of payment. It shall not affect the right of the Company to discharge, transfer, or change the position of a Participant. The Plan shall not be construed to limit or prevent the Company from adopting or changing, from time to time, any rules, standards or procedures affecting the Participant’s employment with the Company or any Company affiliate, including those which affect bonus payouts.
E. If any provision of this Plan is found to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws, that provision shall be severed from the Plan. If such a provision is severed, this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the severed provision had never been part of it and the remaining provisions of this Plan shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the severed provisions or by its severance from this Plan. In place of any severed provision there shall be added automatically as part of this Plan a provision as similar in terms to the severed provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable.
E. This is not an ERISA plan. This is a bonus program.
7
ATTACHMENT A
Award Calculation Guidelines
The following examples are to be used as guidelines in calculating bonus awards at the end of the 201 7 Plan year. Managers should use their discretion in calculating actual bonus awards and may consider exceptions to the calculations below when necessary. Any such exceptions must be fully documented and are subject to review and approval by the Chief Executive Officer, or in the case of a Named Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee.
CERTIFICATION
I, Timothy L. Hassinger , certify that:
|
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ TIMOTHY L. HASSINGER |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Timothy L. Hassinger |
|
December 21 , 2017 |
CERTIFICATION
I, Brian L. Ketcham, certify that:
|
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
|
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN L. KETCHAM |
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Brian L. Ketcham |
|
December 21 , 2017 |
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Lindsay Corporation (the “Compan y”) for the quarter ended November 30 , 2017 , I, Timothy L. Hassinger , Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Brian L. Ketcham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
|
|
(1) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ TIMOTHY L. HASSINGER |
|
|
|
Timothy L. Hassinger |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN L. KETCHAM |
|
|
|
Brian L. Ketcham |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21 , 2017 |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.