UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| (Mark One) | |||||||||||||||||
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||||||||||||||
| For the fiscal year ended | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||||||||||||||
| For the transition period from | _____________ | to | _____________ | ||||||||||||||
Commission File Number 001-10822
National Health Investors Inc
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Maryland | 62-1470956 | ||||||||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||||||||
| 222 Robert Rose Drive | |||||||||||
| Murfreesboro | Tennessee | 37129 | |||||||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | ||||||||||
| (615) | 890-9100 | ||||
| (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) | |||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
| Common Stock, $0.01 par value | NHI | New York Stock Exchange | ||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files) Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
| Large Accelerated Filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to Section 240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2022 (based on the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock Exchange) was approximately $2,581,065,000. There were 43,388,742 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 13, 2023.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
Table of Contents
| Page | |||||
2
PART I.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references throughout this document to “NHI” or the “Company” include National Health Investors, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries. In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “Plain English” guidelines, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been written in the first person. In this document, the words “we”, “our”, “ours” and “us” refer only to National Health Investors, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and not any other person.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other materials we have filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as information included in oral statements made, or to be made, by our senior management contain certain “forward-looking” statements as that term is defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements regarding our expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, continued performance improvements, ability to service and refinance our debt obligations, ability to finance growth opportunities, and similar statements including, without limitation, those containing words such as “may”, “will”, “should,” “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “likely” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from those projected or contemplated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors including, but not limited to, the following:
* Actual or perceived risks associated with public health epidemics or outbreaks, such as the Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, have had and may in the future have a material adverse effect on our operators’ business and results of operations;
* We depend on the operating success of our tenants, managers and borrowers and if their financial condition or business prospects deteriorate, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected;
* We are exposed to the risk that our managers, tenants and borrowers may become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings;
* Certain tenants in our portfolio account for a significant percentage of the rent we expect to generate from our portfolio, and the failure of any of these tenants to meet their obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders;
* Two members of our Board of Directors are also members of the board of directors of National HealthCare Corporation, and their interests may differ from those of our stockholders;
* We are exposed to risks related to governmental regulation and payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid, and the effect of changes to laws, regulations and reimbursement rates on our tenants’ and borrowers’ business;
* We are exposed to the risk that the cash flows of our tenants, managers and borrowers may be adversely affected by increased liability claims and liability insurance costs;
* We are exposed to the risk that we may not be fully indemnified by our tenants, managers and borrowers against future litigation;
* We depend on the success of property development and construction activities, which may fail to achieve the operating results we expect;
* We are exposed to the risk that the illiquidity of real estate investments could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties;
* We are exposed to risks associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on the financial condition of other interests;
* We are subject to risks associated with our joint venture investment with Life Care Services for Timber Ridge, an entrance fee continuing care retirement community, associated with Type A benefits offered to the residents of the joint venture's entrance fee community and related accounting requirements;
3
* We are subject to additional risks related to healthcare operations associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations;
* COVID-19 has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our overall business and financial performance;
* We are exposed to operational risks with respect to our senior housing operating portfolio structured communities;
* Breaches of, disruptions to, or other unauthorized interference with the privacy and security of Company information could cause us to incur substantial costs and reputational damage, and could become subject to litigation and enforcement actions;
* We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances;
* We are subject to risks of damage from catastrophic weather and other natural or man-made disasters and the physical effects of climate change;
* We depend on the success of our future acquisitions and investments;
* We depend on our ability to reinvest cash in real estate investments in a timely manner and on acceptable terms;
* Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties;
* We depend on our ability to retain our management team and other personnel and attract suitable replacements should any such personnel leave;
* We are exposed to the risk that our assets may be subject to impairment charges;
* Our ability to raise capital through equity sales is dependent, in part, on the market price of our common stock, and our failure to meet market expectations with respect to our business, or other factors we do not control, could negatively impact such market price and availability of equity capital;
* We may need to refinance existing debt or incur additional debt in the future, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us;
* We have covenants related to our indebtedness which impose certain operational limitations and a breach of those covenants could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations;
* Downgrades in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital;
* We depend on revenues derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets, while a portion of our debt used to finance those investments bears interest at variable rates;
* We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if we encounter difficulty in obtaining such capital, we may not be able to make future investments necessary to grow our business or meet maturing commitments;
* Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our cash flows;
* We depend on the ability to continue to qualify for taxation as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
* There are no assurances of our ability to pay dividends in the future;
* Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments, which could materially hinder our performance;
4
* Our ownership of and relationship with any taxable REIT subsidiaries that we have formed or will form will be limited and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax;
* Legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes could adversely affect us or our security holders;
* We have ownership limits in our charter with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock which may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders; and
* We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws that could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control transaction, even if the transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe such transaction to be otherwise in their best interests.
See the notes to the annual audited consolidated financial statements, and “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” herein for a further discussion of these and of other factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. You should carefully consider these risks before making any investment decisions in the Company. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing the Company. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of your investment. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, we can give no assurance that these forward-looking statements will, in fact, occur and, therefore, caution investors not to place undue reliance on them.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed REIT specializing in sale-leaseback, joint venture, and mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical facility investments. We operate through two reportable segments: Real Estate Investments and Senior Housing Operating Portfolio (“SHOP”).
Our Real Estate Investments segment consists of real estate investments and lease, mortgage and other notes receivables in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities and a hospital.
As of December 31, 2022, we had investments of approximately $2.4 billion in 160 health care real estate properties located in 32 states and leased pursuant primarily to triple-net leases to 24 tenants consisting of 94 senior housing properties, 65 skilled nursing facilities and one hospital, excluding 13 properties classified as assets held for sale. Our portfolio of 17 mortgages along with other notes receivable totaled $248.5 million, excluding an allowance for expected credit losses of $15.3 million, as of December 31, 2022.
Our SHOP segment is comprised of two ventures that own the operations of independent living facilities. As of December 31, 2022, we had investments of approximately $338.1 million in 15 properties with a combined 1,732 units located in eight states that are operated on behalf of the Company by two independent managers pursuant to the terms of separate management agreements that commenced April 1, 2022. The third-party managers, or related parties of the managers, own equity interests in the respective ventures.
We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities. Our investments in real estate and mortgage loans are secured by real estate located within the United States. Information about revenues from our tenants, resident fees, and borrowers, our net income, cash flows and balance sheet can be found in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
5
Sources of Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from rental income, mortgage and other notes receivable interest income and resident fees and services. During 2022, rental income was $217.7 million (78.3%), interest income from mortgages and other notes receivable was $24.7 million (8.9%) and SHOP revenue was $35.8 million (12.9%) of total revenue of $278.2 million, a decrease of 6.9% from 2021. Our revenues depend on the operating success of our tenants, borrowers and managers whose source and amount of revenues are determined by (i) the licensed beds or other capacity of the facility, (ii) their occupancy rate, (iii) the extent to which the services provided at each facility are utilized by the residents and patients, (iv) the mix of private pay, Medicare and Medicaid patients, and (v) the rates paid by private payors and by the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Classification of Properties in our Portfolio
We operate our business through two reportable segments: Real Estate Investments and SHOP. We classify all of the properties in our Real Estate Investments portfolio as either senior housing or medical properties. Because our leases represent different underlying revenue sources and result in differing risk profiles, we further classify our senior housing properties as either need-driven (assisted living facilities and senior living campuses) or discretionary (independent living facilities and entrance-fee communities). Our SHOP is comprised of 15 independent living facilities located throughout the United States.
Real Estate Investments
Senior Housing. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 94 senior housing properties (“SHO”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by nine SHOs. The SHOs in our portfolio are either need-driven or discretionary for end users and consist of assisted living facilities, senior living campuses, independent living facilities, and entrance-fee communities, which are more fully described below.
Need-Driven Senior Housing
Assisted Living Facilities. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 66 assisted living facilities (“ALF”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by eight ALFs. ALFs are free-standing facilities that provide basic room and board functions for elderly residents. As residents typically receive assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, grooming, administering medication and memory care services, we consider these facilities to be need-driven senior housing. On-site staff personnel are available to assist in minor medical needs on an as-needed basis. Operators of ALFs are typically paid from private sources without assistance from government. ALFs may be licensed and regulated in some states, but generally do not require the issuance of a Certificate of Need (“CON”) as is often required for skilled nursing facilities (“SNF”).
Senior Living Campuses. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 10 senior living campuses (“SLC”) leased to operators. SLCs contain one or more buildings that include skilled nursing beds combined with an independent or assisted living facility that provides basic room and board functions for elderly residents. They may also provide assistance to residents with activities of daily living such as bathing, grooming and administering medication. On-site staff personnel are available to assist with minor medical needs on an as-needed basis. As the decision to transition to a SLC is typically more than a lifestyle choice and is usually driven by the need to receive some moderate level of care, we consider this facility type to be need-driven. Operators of SLCs are typically paid from private sources and from government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid for skilled nursing residents. SLCs may be licensed and regulated as nursing homes in some states and may also require a CON.
Discretionary Senior Housing
Independent Living Facilities. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included seven independent living facilities (“ILF”) leased to operators. ILFs offer specially designed residential units for active senior adults and provide various ancillary services for their residents including restaurants, activity rooms and social areas. Services provided by ILF operators are generally paid from private sources without assistance from government payors. ILFs are generally, but not always, unlicensed facilities and do not require the issuance of a CON as required for SNFs. As ILFs typically do not provide assistance with activities of daily living, we consider the decision to transition to an ILF to be discretionary.
Entrance-Fee Communities. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 11 entrance-fee communities (“EFC”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by one EFC. EFCs, frequently referred to as continuing care retirement communities (“CCRC”), typically include a combination of detached cottages, an ILF, an ALF and a SNF on one campus. These communities appeal to residents because there is no need to relocate when health and medical needs
6
change. EFCs are classified as either Type A, B, or C depending upon the amount of healthcare benefits included in the entrance fee. “Type A” EFCs, or “Lifecare” communities, such as Timber Ridge, held by us since January 31, 2020 in a joint venture, include substantially all future healthcare costs in the payment of an entrance fee and thereafter payment of a set service fee paid monthly. The entrance fee is divided into a refundable and non-refundable portion depending upon the resident’s chosen contract program. The service fee is determined at the time of move-in into an independent living (“IL”) unit and is subject to certain inflation-based adjustments regardless of the resident’s future care needs. A resident must move into an IL unit initially and not require care at the time of move-in. Thereafter the resident’s care requirements from assisted living to memory care to skilled nursing are provided for. Communities providing a modified healthcare contract offering access to skilled nursing care but only paying for a maximum number of days are referred to as “Type B” EFCs. Finally, “Type C” EFCs, the classification applicable to ten communities in our lease portfolio and one community securing a mortgage loan, are fee-for-service communities which do not provide any healthcare benefits and correspondingly have the lowest entrance fees. However, monthly fees may be higher to reflect the current healthcare components delivered to each resident. EFC licensure is state-specific, but generally skilled nursing beds included in our EFC portfolio are subject to state licensure and regulation. Certain services may also require a CON. As the decision to transition to an EFC is typically made as a lifestyle choice and not as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider the decision to transition to an EFC to be discretionary. Accordingly, the predominant source of revenue for operators of EFCs is from private payor sources.
Medical. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 66 medical facilities leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by eight medical facilities. The medical facilities within our portfolio consist of SNFs and a hospital, which are more fully described below.
Skilled Nursing Facilities. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 65 SNFs leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by eight SNFs. SNFs provide some combination of skilled and intermediate nursing and rehabilitative care, including speech, physical and occupational therapy. The operators of the SNFs receive payment from a combination of private pay sources and government payors such as Medicaid and Medicare. SNFs are required to obtain state licenses and are highly regulated at the federal, state and local level. Operators in 11 of the 13 states in which we own SNFs must obtain a CON from the state before opening or expanding such facilities. Some SNFs also include assisted living beds. As the decision to utilize the services of a SNF is typically made as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need-driven medical facility.
Hospitals. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included one hospital (“HOSP”) leased to an operator. Hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services, including acute psychiatric, behavioral and rehabilitation services, and are subject to extensive federal, state and local legislation and regulation. Hospitals undergo periodic inspections regarding standards of medical care, equipment and hygiene as a condition of licensure. Services provided by hospitals are generally paid for by a combination of private pay sources and government payors. As the decision to utilize the services of a hospital is typically made as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need-driven medical facility.
Medical Office Building. As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included no medical office buildings (“MOB”). We have a $50.0 million mezzanine loan and security agreement with Montecito Medical Real Estate for a fund that invests in medical real estate, including MOBs. Historically, our investment strategy has included owning and leasing MOBs whose tenants are primarily physicians and other medical practitioners. As the decision to utilize the services of an MOB is typically made as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need-driven medical facility. The MOB differs from conventional office buildings due to the special requirements of the tenants.
Senior Housing Operating Portfolio
As of December 31, 2022, our portfolio included 15 ILFs with 1,732 units located throughout the United States which we consider to be discretionary senior housing as discussed in more detail above.
Nature of Investments
Our investments are typically structured as acquisitions of properties through purchase-leaseback transactions, acquisitions of properties from other real estate investors, loans, or operations through structures allowed by the REIT Investment Diversification Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). We have provided construction loans for certain facilities for which we were already committed to provide long-term financing or for which the operator agreed to enter into a purchase option and lease with us upon completion of construction or after the facility is stabilized. The annual interest rates we receive on our
7
mortgage, construction and mezzanine loans ranged between 7.0% and 9.5% during 2022. We believe our lease and loan terms are competitive within our peer group. Typical characteristics of these transactions are as follows:
Leases. Our leases for the properties in our Real Estate Investments segment generally have an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years with one or more five-year tenant renewal options. The leases are “triple-net leases” under which the tenant is responsible for the payment of all taxes, utilities, insurance premiums, repairs and other charges relating to the operation of the properties, including required levels of capital expenditures each year. The tenant is obligated at its expense to keep all improvements, fixtures and other components of the properties covered by “all risk” insurance in an amount equal to at least the full replacement cost thereof, and to maintain specified minimum personal injury and property damage insurance, protecting us as well as the tenant. The leases also require the tenant to indemnify and hold us harmless from all claims resulting from the use, occupancy and related activities of each property by the tenant, and to indemnify us against all costs related to any release, discovery, clean-up and removal of hazardous substances or materials, or other environmental responsibility with respect to each facility.
Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. For financial statement purposes, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease where the lease contains fixed escalators. Certain of our tenants hold purchase options allowing them to acquire properties they currently lease from NHI. When present, tenant purchase options generally give the tenant an option to purchase the underlying property for consideration not less than our net investment basis.
Some of the obligations under the leases are guaranteed by the parent corporation of the tenant, if any, or affiliates or individual principals of the tenant. In some leases, third parties or affiliated entities will also guarantee some portion of the lease obligations. Some obligations are backed further by other collateral such as security deposits, trade receivables, equipment, furnishings and other personal property.
We monitor our triple-net tenant credit quality and identify any material changes by performing the following activities:
•Obtaining financial statements on a monthly, quarterly and annual basis to assess the operational trends of our tenants and the financial position and capability of those tenants
•Calculating the operating cash flow for each of our tenants
•Calculating the lease service coverage ratio and other ratios pertinent to our tenants
•Obtaining property-level occupancy rates for our tenants
•Verifying the payment of real estate taxes by our tenants
•Obtaining certificates of insurance for each tenant
•Obtaining reviewed or audited financial statements of our tenant corporate guarantors on an annual basis, if applicable
•Conducting a periodic inspection of our properties to ascertain proper maintenance, repair and upkeep
•Monitoring those tenants with indications of continuing and material deteriorating credit quality through discussions with our executive management and Board of Directors
Mortgage loans. We have mortgage loans with original maturities generally five years or greater, with varying amortization schedules from interest-only to fully amortizing. Most of the loans are at a fixed interest rate; however, some interest rates increase based on a fixed schedule. In most cases, the owner of the facility is committed to make minimum annual capital expenditures for the purpose of maintaining or upgrading their respective facility. Additionally, most of our loans are collateralized by first or second mortgage liens and corporate or personal guarantees. As of December 31, 2022, we have eight mortgage loans bearing interest ranging from 7.0% to 8.25% per annum.
Mezzanine loans. Frequently in situations calling for temporary financing or when our borrowers’ in-place lending arrangements prohibit the extension of mortgage security, we typically extend credit based on corporate and/or personal guarantees. These mezzanine loans sometimes combine with an NHI purchase option covering the subject property. As of December 31, 2022, we have five mezzanine loans with interest rates we receive that range from approximately 8.0% to 9.5% per annum.
Construction loans. From time to time, we also provide construction loans that become mortgage loans upon the completion of the construction of the subject facility. We may also obtain a purchase option to acquire the facility at a future date and lease the facility back to the borrower. During the term of the construction loan, funds are usually advanced pursuant to draw requests made by the borrower in accordance with the terms and conditions of the loan. Interest is typically assessed on these loans at rates equivalent to the eventual mortgage rate upon conversion. In addition to the security of the lien against the property, we will generally require additional security and collateral in the form of either payment and performance completion bonds or completion guarantees by the borrower’s parent, affiliates of the borrower or one or more of the individuals who
8
control the borrower. As of December 31, 2022, we have five construction loans bearing interest ranging from 7.5% to 9.0% per annum.
Other notes receivable. We have provided a revolving line of credit to a borrower involved in the senior housing industry who has provided personal and business guarantees as security that bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% per annum, as of December 31, 2022.
RIDEA Transactions. Our arrangement with an affiliate of Life Care Services, which we completed in January 2020 and is structured to be compliant with the provisions of RIDEA, permits NHI to receive rent payments through a triple-net lease between a property company owned 75% by NHI and an operating company owned 25% by a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) of NHI and gives NHI the opportunity to capture additional value on the improving performance of the operating company through distributions to the TRS. Accordingly, the TRS holds our 25% equity interest in an unconsolidated operating company, and provides an organizational structure that allows the TRS to engage in a broad range of activities and share in revenues that would otherwise be non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income tests. The TRS is subject to state and federal income taxes.
Senior Housing Operating Portfolio. Effective April 1, 2022, 15 senior housing ILFs previously part of the legacy Holiday Retirement (“Holiday”) properties were transferred from a triple-net lease to two separate ventures comprising our SHOP, which represents a new reportable segment. These ventures, in which NHI owns a majority interest, own the underlying independent living operations and are structured to comply with REIT requirements that utilize the TRS for activities that would otherwise be non-qualifying for REIT purposes. These properties are operated by two third-party property managers that manage our communities in exchange for the receipt of a management fee, and as such, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of the property managers in the same manner or to the same extent as we are to our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on the property managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our communities efficiently and effectively. We also rely on the property managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. As of December 31, 2022, our SHOP consisted of 15 ILFs with a combined 1,732 units located in eight states.
Operator Composition
For the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately 25% of our Real Estate Investments portfolio revenue was from publicly owned operators, 50% was from regional operators, 11% was from privately owned national chains and 3% was from smaller operators. Tenants in our Real Estate Investments portfolio which individually provided more than 3% and collectively 59% of our total revenues were (parent companies, in alphabetical order): Discovery Senior Living (“Discovery”); Encore Senior Living; Health Services Management; Holiday; Life Care Services; National HealthCare Corporation (“NHC”); Senior Living Communities (“Senior Living”); and The Ensign Group. We make reference to the parent companies whenever we describe our business with these tenants, their subsidiaries and/or affiliates regardless of the specific subsidiary entity indicated on the lease or loan documents.
Tenant Concentration
The following table contains information regarding tenant concentration in our Real Estate Investments portfolio, excluding $2.6 million for our corporate office, $338.1 million for the SHOP segment, and a credit loss reserve of $15.3 million, based on the percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 related to tenants or affiliates of tenants, that exceed 10% of total revenue ($ in thousands):
9
| As of December 31, 2022 | Revenues1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset | Gross Real | Notes | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class | Estate2 | Receivable | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living | EFC | $ | 573,631 | $ | 48,547 | $ | 51,183 | 18% | $ | 50,726 | 17% | $ | 50,734 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NHC | SNF | 133,770 | — | 36,893 | 13% | 37,735 | 12% | 37,820 | 11% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bickford3 | ALF | 414,870 | 32,727 | N/A | N/A | 34,599 | 12% | 49,451 | 15% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holiday3 | ILF | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 40,705 | 12% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All others, net | Various | 1,329,461 | 167,205 | 144,534 | 52% | 164,017 | 55% | 144,448 | 44% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Escrow funds received from tenants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| for property operating expenses | Various | — | — | 9,788 | 4% | 11,638 | 4% | 9,653 | 3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,451,732 | $ | 248,479 | 242,398 | 298,715 | 332,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resident fees and services4 | 35,796 | 13% | — | —% | — | —% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 278,194 | $ | 298,715 | $ | 332,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Includes interest income on notes receivable and rental income from properties classified as held for sale.
2 Amounts include any properties classified as held for sale.
3 Revenues included in All others, net for years when less than 10%.
4 There is no tenant concentration in resident fees and services because these agreements are with individual residents.
At December 31, 2022, the two states in which we had an investment concentration of 10% or more were South Carolina (12.1%) and Texas (10.7%). At December 31, 2021, the two states in which we had an investment concentration of 10% or more were also South Carolina (11.6%) and Texas (10.3%).
Senior Living - As of December 31, 2022, we leased ten retirement communities totaling 2,200 units to Senior Living pursuant to triple-net lease agreements maturing through December 2029. Straight-line rent of $0.4 million, $2.5 million and $4.3 million and interest revenue of $3.7 million, $3.2 million and $3.0 million were recognized from Senior Living for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We provided a $20.0 million revolving line of credit in 2014 whose borrowings are to be used primarily to finance construction projects within the Senior Living portfolio, including building additional units, and general working capital needs. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the revolving line of credit was amended to reset the interest rate to 8.0% per annum effective in November 2022 and reduce the availability to $15.0 million on January 1, 2025. The revolving line of credit matures in December 2029 at the time of lease maturity. At December 31, 2022, the balance outstanding under the facility was $15.8 million.
In June 2019, we provided a mortgage loan of $32.7 million to Senior Living for the acquisition of a 248-unit continuing care retirement community in Columbia, South Carolina. The financing is for a term of five years with two one-year extensions and carries an interest rate of 7.25%, per annum. Additionally, the loan conveys to NHI a purchase option at a stated minimum price of $38.3 million, subject to adjustment for market conditions.
NHC - The facilities leased to NHC, a publicly held company, are under a master lease and consist of three independent living facilities and 32 skilled nursing facilities (four of which are subleased to other parties for whom the lease payments are guaranteed to us by NHC). Effective September 1, 2022, we amended the master lease dated October 17, 1991, concurrently with the sale of a portfolio of seven skilled nursing facilities. The properties sold were leased to NHC pursuant to a master lease agreement dated August 30, 2013 with an original maturity date of August 31, 2028 that was terminated upon completion of the sale. The amendment increased the annual base rent due each year through the expiration of the master lease on December 31, 2026. There are two additional five-year renewal options at a fair rental value as negotiated between the parties.
The annual base rent prior to the amendment was $30.8 million and was increased to $34.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, with credit given for rent paid in 2022 related to the sold portfolio. In addition to the base rent, NHC will continue to pay any additional rent and percentage rent as required by the master lease. Under the terms of the amended lease, rent escalates by 4% of the increase, if any, in each facility’s annual revenue over a 2007 base year. We refer to this additional rent component as “percentage rent.” Total percentage rent of $3.1 million, $3.5 million, and $3.7 million was recognized for
10
the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. No material straight-line rent was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Two of our board members, including our chairman, are also members of NHC’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2022, NHC owned 1,630,642 shares (approximately 4%) of our common stock.
Other Operators
Bickford - As of December 31, 2022, we leased 36 facilities, excluding three facilities classified as assets held for sale, under four leases to Bickford. Revenues from Bickford reflect the impact of pandemic-related rent concessions accounted for as variable lease payments of approximately $5.5 million, $18.3 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we wrote off approximately $18.1 million of straight-line rents receivable and $7.1 million of lease incentives, which were included in “Other assets, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as a reduction to rental income upon converting Bickford to the cash basis of accounting. These write-offs were the result of a change in our evaluation of collectability of future rent payments due under Bickford’s four master lease agreements based upon information we obtained from Bickford in the second quarter of 2022 regarding its financial condition that raised substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Cash rent received from Bickford for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $27.6 million.
In November 2022, we acquired a 60-unit ALF located in Virginia Beach, Virginia, from Bickford. The acquisition price was $17.2 million, including $0.2 million in closing costs and the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14.0 million including interest. The acquisition price also included a reduction of $3.0 million in Bickford’s outstanding pandemic-related rent deferrals that were recognized in rental income in the fourth quarter of 2022 based on the fair value of the real estate assets received. We added the facility to an existing master lease with Bickford for a term of 10.5 years at an initial rate of 8.0%, with annual Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.
Other than the asset acquisition described above and the three properties sold that are included in the asset dispositions table in Note 3, Investment Activity to our consolidated financial statements under “2022 Asset Dispositions” we completed various restructuring activities in the Bickford leased property portfolio during the first half of 2022. In March 2022, we transferred one ALF located in Pennsylvania from the Bickford portfolio to a new operator that is leased pursuant to a ten-year triple-net lease and wrote off approximately $0.7 million in a straight-line rent receivable, reducing rental income. Effective April 1, 2022, we restructured and amended three of Bickford’s master lease agreements covering 28 properties and reached agreement on the repayment terms of its outstanding pandemic-related deferrals. Significant terms of these agreements are as follows:
• Extended the maturity dates of the modified leases to 2033 and 2035. The remaining master lease agreement covering 11 properties with an original maturity in 2023 was previously extended to 2028.
• Reduced the combined rent for the portfolio to approximately $28.3 million (excluding the ALF in Virginia Beach acquired in the fourth quarter of 2022) per year through April 1, 2024, subject to a nominal annual increase, at which time the rent will be reset to a fair market value, but not less than 8.0% of our initial gross investment.
• Required monthly payments beginning October 2022 through December 2024 based on a percentage of Bickford’s monthly revenues exceeding an established threshold to be applied to the outstanding pandemic-related deferrals granted to Bickford. The deferrals may be reduced by up to $6.0 million upon Bickford achieving certain performance targets and the sale or transition of certain properties to new operators of which $3.0 million was earned in the fourth quarter of 2022.
Bickford Construction Loans - As of December 31, 2022, we had two fully funded construction loans to Bickford totaling $28.9 million and bear interest at 9.0% per annum. The construction loans are secured by first mortgage liens on substantially all real and personal property as well as a pledge of any and all leases or agreements which may grant a right of use to the property. Usual and customary covenants extend to the agreements, including the borrower’s obligation for payment of insurance and taxes. NHI has a fair market value purchase option on the properties at stabilization of the underlying operations. In February 2023, we exercised our option to acquire one of these properties for a purchase price of $17.3 million.
We also have a mortgage note of $4.0 million issued by Bickford. The note, due February 2025, bears interest at 7.0% per annum, and began amortizing on a twenty-five-year basis in January 2021.
11
Holiday Portfolio Transition - On April 1, 2022, we completed the restructuring of our legacy Holiday portfolio comprised of 26 ILFs as of the beginning of 2021. Below is a summary of the pertinent restructuring activities:
•On July 30, 2021, Welltower Inc. (“Welltower”) completed the acquisition of a portfolio of legacy Holiday properties from Fortress Investment Group and entered into a new agreement with Atria Senior Living to assume operations of the Holiday portfolio. These transactions resulted in a Welltower-controlled subsidiary becoming the tenant under our existing master lease for the NHI-owned Holiday real estate assets. Rental income from our Holiday portfolio was $23.5 million in 2021 prior to the change in tenant ownership. Rental income was $40.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
•In the third quarter of 2021, we sold nine of these properties for net proceeds of $119.7 million.
•We received no rent from the Welltower-controlled affiliate due under the master lease after the change in tenant ownership occurred in late July 2021. Accordingly, we placed the tenant on cash basis and filed suit against Welltower and certain of its subsidiaries for default under the master lease. Reference Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the litigation and its settlement in 2022.
•During the first quarter of 2022, we applied the remaining approximately $8.8 million legacy Holiday lease deposit to past due rents.
•On April 1, 2022, we received $6.9 million upon settlement and dismissal of the Welltower litigation. Concurrently with the settlement and dismissal, we transitioned 15 of the legacy Holiday ILFs into two separate partnership ventures that own the underlying independent living operations, forming our new SHOP segment. Reference Notes 5 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements for more discussion.
.
•On April 1, 2022, we disposed of one property classified in assets held for sale for net proceeds of $3.0 million and transitioned one assisted living community in Florida to our existing real estate partnership with Discovery. The transitioned property was added to the partnership’s in-place master lease.
Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of commitments, typically consisting of funding of revolving credit arrangements, construction and mezzanine loans to our operators to conduct expansions and acquisitions for their own account, and commitments for the funding of construction for expansion or renovation to our existing properties under lease. In our leasing operations, we offer to our tenants and to sellers of newly acquired properties a variety of inducements which originate contractually as contingencies but which may become commitments upon the satisfaction of the contingent event. Contingent payments earned will be included in the respective lease bases when funded.
As of December 31, 2022, we had working capital, construction and mezzanine loan commitments to six operators for $159.6 million, of which we had funded $103.3 million toward these commitments. As of December 31, 2022, $26.6 million of the funding obligation is payable within 12 months with the remaining commitment due between three to five years.
As of December 31, 2022, we had $33.5 million of development commitments for construction and renovation for ten properties, of which we had funded $25.7 million toward these commitments, with the remaining amount expected to be payable within 12 months. In addition to these commitments, we had approximately $1.8 million in various other commitments not yet funded as of December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, we had $28.6 million of contingent lease inducement commitments in seven lease agreements which are generally based on the performance of facility operations and may or may not be met by the tenant. At December 31, 2022, we had funded $2.7 million toward these commitments. In February 2023, Timber Ridge OpCo formally requested payout of its $10.0 million lease inducement based upon the achievement of all performance conditions.
Competition and Market Conditions
We compete primarily with other REITs, private equity funds, banks and insurance companies in the acquisition, leasing and financing of healthcare real estate.
Operators of our facilities compete on a local and regional basis with operators of facilities that provide comparable services. Operators compete for residents and/or patients and staff based on quality of care, reputation, location and physical
12
appearance of facilities, services offered, family preference, physicians, staff and price. Competition is with other operators as well as companies managing multiple facilities, some of which are substantially larger and have greater resources than the operators of our facilities. Some of these facilities are operated for profit, while others are owned by governmental agencies or tax exempt not-for-profit entities.
Our senior housing properties generally rely on private-pay residents who may be negatively impacted in an economic downturn. In addition, the success of these properties is often impacted by the existence of comparable, competing facilities in a local market.
Environmental Matters
We believe that integrating environmental and sustainability initiatives into our strategic business objectives will contribute to our long-term success and to the success of our tenants by enhancing the quality of life of the residents of the facilities. Listed below are some of the highlights of our efforts to promote environmental sustainability at our properties and with our tenants.
•We provide our triple-net lease operators capital improvement allowances for the redevelopment, expansions and renovations at our properties which may include energy efficient improvements like LED lighting and low emission carpeting, recycled materials and solar power;
•We provide our development partners with capital to build new state-of-the-art properties with energy efficient components and design features;
•We obtain Phase I environmental and Phase II reports if warranted as part of our due diligence procedures when acquiring properties and attempt to avoid buying real estate with known environmental contamination;
•We strive for efficiency and sustainability in our corporate headquarters, participate in a recycling program, and encourage our employees to reduce, reuse and recycle waste. Our document retention practices strive to reduce paper usage and encourage electronic file sharing; and
We are also subject to environmental risks and regulations in our business. See “– Government Regulation – Environmental Regulations” below; “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Risks Related to our Business and Operations - We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances” and “– We are subject to risks of damage from catastrophic weather and other natural or man-made disasters and the physical effects of climate change” for a description of the risks and regulations associated with environmental matters.
Human Capital
We employ individuals who possess a broad range of experiences, background and skills. We believe that to continue to deliver long-term value to our stockholders, we must provide and maintain a work environment that attracts, develops, and retains top talent and affords our employees an engaging work experience that allows for career development and opportunities. Along with a competitive compensation program including incentive bonuses and a stock option plan, NHI provides a 401(k) plan with a safe harbor contribution, paid employee health insurance coverage and tuition reimbursement.
As of December 31, 2022, we had 25 full-time employees, an increase of six over the total at December 31, 2021, and two part-time employees. Of those employees, 24 are located in the Murfreesboro, Tennessee office, with one employee in each of Colorado, Florida, and Texas. The tenure of our current employees includes 11 who have been with the Company for over five years (but less than ten years), and six who have been with the Company over ten years (but less than 20 years). Two of our employees have been with the Company over 20 years. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We empower our employees and reinforce our corporate culture through onboarding, training, and social and team-building events. We actively support charitable organizations within our community that promote health education and social well-being, and we encourage our employees to personally volunteer with organizations that are meaningful to them. We consider our employee relations to be good.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we initiated a number of safety protocols to ensure employee safety, including encouraging employees to work from home, enhanced cleaning and disinfecting procedures and implementing clear protocols and procedures for monitoring and reporting close contact and illness. In 2022, we continued to monitor local conditions and to follow Center for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) guidelines regarding isolation and quarantine protocols.
Certain essential services such as internal audit, tax compliance, information technology and legal services are outsourced to third-party professional firms.
13
Government Regulation
Overview. Our tenants and borrowers that operate SNFs, nursing homes, hospitals, SLCs, ALFs and EFCs are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations, including those relating to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, fraud and abuse, relationships with referral sources and referral recipients, licensure and certification, building codes, privacy and security of health information and other personal data, CON, appropriateness and classification of care, qualifications of medical and support personnel, distribution, maintenance and dispensing of pharmaceuticals, communications with patients and consumers, and the operation of healthcare facilities. In addition, many of our tenants and borrowers that operate ILFs may be subject to state licensing, and all of our properties are subject to environmental regulations related to real estate. We expect that the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in these and other areas. These laws and regulations are wide-ranging, vary across jurisdictions, and are administered by several government agencies. Further, these laws and regulations are subject to change, enforcement practices may evolve, and it is difficult to predict the impact of new laws and regulations. Our tenants may find it increasingly difficult and costly to operate within this complex and evolving regulatory environment. Noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties that could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of tenants, managers or borrowers, which in turn may adversely affect us. The following is a brief discussion of certain laws and regulations applicable to certain of our tenants, managers and borrowers and, in certain cases, to us.
Licensure and Certification. Various licenses, certifications and permits are required to operate SNFs, ALFs, EFCs, hospitals and, to a lesser degree, ILFs, to dispense narcotics, to handle radioactive materials and to operate equipment, among other regulated actions. Licensure, certification and enrollment with government programs may be conditioned on requirements related to, among other things, the quality of medical care provided, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment, capital and other expenditures, record keeping, dietary services, infection prevention and control, and patient rights. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has issued additional requirements for certain healthcare facilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including requirements to test SNF staff and residents for COVID-19 under certain circumstances and to report COVID-19 data to the CDC. Licensed facilities are generally subject to periodic inspections by regulators to determine compliance with applicable licensure and certification standards. Further, some states have established requirements for facility spending, for example requiring nursing homes to spend a certain percentage of revenue on direct care for residents. Sanctions for failure to comply with these laws and regulations include (but are not limited to) loss of licensure and ability to participate in the Medicare, Medicaid, and other government healthcare programs, suspension of or non-payment for new admissions, fines, as well as potential criminal penalties. The failure of any tenant, manager or borrower to comply with such laws and regulations could affect its ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect any such tenant’s or borrower’s ability to make lease or debt payments to us. In addition, if we have to replace a tenant, we may experience difficulties in finding a replacement because our ability to replace the tenant may be affected by federal and state laws governing changes in control and ownership.
The healthcare facilities in which we invest may be subject to state CON or similar laws, which require government approval prior to the construction or establishment of new facilities, the expansion of existing facilities, the addition of beds to existing facilities, the addition of services or certain capital expenditures. CON requirements are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. We cannot predict the impact of regulatory changes with respect to CONs on the operations of our tenants, managers and borrowers.
Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement. A significant portion of the revenue of our SNF tenants and borrowers is derived from government-funded reimbursement programs, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. The Medicare and Medicaid programs are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law.
Medicare is a federal health insurance program for persons age 65 and over, some disabled persons, and persons with end-stage renal disease. Medicare generally covers SNF services for beneficiaries who require skilled nursing or therapy services after a qualifying hospital stay. Medicare Part A generally pays a per diem rate for each beneficiary. The reimbursement rates are set forth under a prospective payment system (“PPS”), an acuity-based classification system that uses nursing and therapy indexes, adjusted by additional factors such as geographic differences in wage rates, to calculate per diem rates for each Medicare beneficiary. The Medicare Part A payment rates cover most services to be provided to a beneficiary for a limited benefit period, including room and board, skilled nursing care, therapy, and medications. CMS updates Medicare payment rates annually. For fiscal year 2023, which started October 1, 2022, CMS estimates that payments to SNFs under the SNF PPS will increase by $904.0 million, or 2.7%, compared to fiscal year 2022.
14
CMS has implemented policies intended to shift Medicare to value-based payment methodologies that tie reimbursement to quality of care rather than quantity. For example, effective October 1, 2019, CMS implemented the Patient Driven Payment Model (“PDPM”). This payment methodology classifies beneficiaries into payment groups based on clinical factors using diagnosis codes rather than by volume of services. In addition, under the SNF Quality Reporting Program, CMS requires SNFs to report certain quality data, and SNFs that fail to do so are subject to payment reductions. Under the SNF Value-Based Purchasing Program, CMS reduces SNF Medicare payments by 2 percentage points, and redistributes the majority of these funds as incentive payments based on SNF quality measure performance. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS is continuing to implement a measure suppression policy for the SNF Value-Based Purchasing Program through federal fiscal year 2023, which is intended to mitigate the effect that performance measures impacted by COVID-19 would otherwise have on performance scores and incentive payments.
From time to time, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) revises the reimbursement systems used to reimburse healthcare providers. For example, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (“IMPACT Act”) requires HHS, in conjunction with the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, to work toward a unified payment system for post-acute care services provided by SNFs, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, home health agencies, and long-term care hospitals. A unified post-acute care payment system would pay post-acute care providers, including SNFs, under a single framework according to a patient’s characteristics, rather than based on the post-acute care setting where the patient receives treatment. As required under the statute, CMS issued a report presenting a prototype for a unified post-acute care payment model in July 2022. CMS noted in its report the need for additional analyses and acknowledged that the universal implementation of a unified post-acute care payment system would require congressional action. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is required to submit a proposal by June 2023.
Medicaid is a medical assistance program for eligible needy persons that is funded jointly by federal and state governments. Medicaid programs are operated by state agencies under plans approved by the federal government. Reimbursement methodologies, eligibility requirements and covered services vary from state to state. In many instances, revenues from Medicaid programs are insufficient to cover the actual costs incurred in providing care to patients, particularly in nursing facilities. Outside of the government response to the COVID-19 pandemic, budgetary pressures have, in recent years, resulted in decreased spending, or decreased spending growth, for Medicaid programs in many states. Changes in federal policy and funding may be an additional source of uncertainty. For example, under early COVID-related legislation, states that maintain continuous Medicaid enrollment are eligible for a temporary increase in federal funds for state Medicaid expenditures. The continuous coverage requirement was originally established to run for the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency (“PHE”) but, under recent legislation, the continuous coverage requirement will now expire as of April 1, 2023, and the increase in federal funding will be phased out through calendar year 2023. Budgetary pressures are expected to continue in the future, and many states are actively seeking ways to reduce Medicaid spending, including for nursing home and assisted living care, by methods such as capitated payments, reductions in reimbursement rates, and increased enrollment in managed Medicaid plans. Some states and managed care plans are pursuing alternatives to institutional care, such as home-based and community services. Several of the states in which we have investments have actively sought to reduce or slow the increase of Medicaid spending for care in nursing homes and other settings.
In addition to reimbursement pressures and changes in governmental healthcare programs, healthcare facilities are experiencing increasing pressure from private payors attempting to control healthcare costs. In some cases, private payors rely on governmental reimbursement systems to determine reimbursement rates. Changes to Medicare and Medicaid that reduce payments under these programs may negatively impact payments from private payors. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or the effect that any future reforms may have on our tenants’, managers’ and borrowers’ costs of doing business and on the amount of reimbursement by government and other third-party payors. There can be no assurance that future payment rates for either government or private payors will be sufficient to cover potential cost increases in providing services to patients. Any changes in government or private payor reimbursement policies that reduce payments to levels that are insufficient to cover the cost of providing patient care could adversely affect the operating revenues of managers, tenants and borrowers in our properties that rely on such payments, and thereby adversely affect their ability to make their lease or debt payments to us.
Federal Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government passed legislation and promulgated regulations implementing a series of economic stimulus and relief measures. In total, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) authorize $186 billion in funding to be distributed to healthcare providers through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (“Provider Relief Fund”). These funds are intended to reimburse eligible providers for healthcare-related expenses or lost revenues attributable to COVID-19. Recipients are not required to repay Provider Relief Fund payments as long as they attest to and comply with certain terms and conditions, including reporting requirements, limitations on balance billing, and not using
15
Provider Relief Fund payments to reimburse expenses or losses that other sources have or are obligated to reimburse. A number of our tenants and borrowers have received grants under the CARES Act and related legislation.
The CARES Act and related legislation include other provisions offering financial relief. For example, Congress temporarily suspended Medicare sequestration payment adjustments, which would have otherwise reduced payments to Medicare providers by 2% as required by the Budget Control Act of 2011, (“BCA”). The sequestration adjustment was phased back in with a 1% reduction beginning April 1, 2022, and returned to 2% on July 1, 2022. The BCA sequestration has been extended through the first six months of 2032. As a result of the ARPA’s impact on the federal budget deficit, an additional Medicare payment reduction of up to 4% was required to take effect in January 2022. However, Congress has delayed implementation of this reduction until 2025.
In addition to offering economic relief to individuals and businesses, the federal legislation included provisions intended to ease legal and regulatory burdens on healthcare providers. Many of the legislative and regulatory measures allowing for flexibility in delivery of care and various financial supports for healthcare providers are available only for the duration of the PHE declared by the HHS in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The current HHS declaration expires April 11, 2023, however, the current administration has announced that it intends to terminate the PHE declaration on May 11, 2023.
During the COVID-19 PHE, federal and state governments and local health authorities have imposed measures intended to limit the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate the burden on the healthcare system. For example, a CMS regulation requires COVID-19 vaccinations for workers in certain Medicare- and Medicaid-certified providers and suppliers, including hospitals and long-term care facilities such as SNFs. Our managers, borrowers and tenants have been and may continue to be impacted by the health and economic effects of COVID-19.
Fraud and Abuse. Participants in the healthcare industry are subject to various complex federal and state civil and criminal laws and regulations governing a wide array of healthcare provider referrals, relationships and arrangements. These laws include: (i) federal and state false claims acts, which generally prohibit providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs; (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the payment or receipt of any consideration in exchange for referral of Medicare and Medicaid patients; (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal prohibition commonly referred to as the Stark Law, which generally prohibit referrals by physicians to entities for designated health services (which include hospital inpatient and outpatient services and some of the services provided in SNFs) with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship; and (iv) the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which requires a lower burden of proof than other fraud and abuse laws. These laws and regulations subject violators to severe penalties, including exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, punitive sanctions, fines and even prison sentences. They are enforced by a variety of federal, state and local agencies, and can also be enforced by private litigants through, among other things, federal and state false claims acts, which allow private litigants to bring qui tam or “whistleblower” actions. In recent years, both federal and state governments have significantly increased investigation and enforcement activity to detect and punish wrongdoers.
It is anticipated that the trend toward increased investigation and enforcement activity will continue. In the event that any manager, tenant or borrower were to be found in violation of any of these laws and regulations, that manager’s, tenant’s or borrower’s ability to operate the facility could be jeopardized, which could adversely affect any such tenant’s or borrower’s ability to make lease or debt payments to us and could thereby adversely affect us.
Privacy and Security. Privacy and security regulations issued pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) restrict the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information (“protected health information”), provide for individual rights, require safeguards for protected health information and require notification of breaches of unsecure protected health information. Entities subject to HIPAA include health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and most healthcare providers (including some of our managers, tenants and borrowers). Business associates of these entities who create, receive, maintain or transmit protected health information are also subject to certain HIPAA provisions. Violations of HIPAA may result in substantial civil and/or criminal fines and penalties.
The costs to the business or, for an operator of a healthcare property, associated with developing and maintaining programs and systems to comply with data privacy and security laws, defending against privacy and security related claims or enforcement actions and paying any assessed fines can be substantial. Moreover, such costs could have a material adverse effect on the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.
There are several other laws and legislative and regulatory initiatives at the federal and state levels addressing privacy and security of personal data that may not be preempted by HIPAA. Federal and state data privacy and security laws and regulations
16
and related requirements continue to evolve, and changes may affect compliance obligations, business operations and/or transactions that depend on data. In particular, the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) requires subject companies that process information on California residents to, among other things, provide new disclosures and options to consumers about data collection, use and sharing practices. Further, the CCPA has been subject to revision and amendments, including significant modifications made by the California Privacy Rights Act, under which the majority of requirements took effect on January 1, 2023. Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and Virginia recently enacted similar laws that take effect in 2023, and other states are considering expanding or passing privacy laws in the near term.
Many of these privacy laws and regulations and related interpretations are subject to uncertain application, interpretation or enforcement standards that could result in claims against us and/or our tenants, borrowers, and operators, extensive changes to our business practices, systems and operational processes, including our data processing and security systems, penalties, increased operating costs or other impacts on our businesses. Many of the recently enacted laws often provide for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action in certain jurisdictions for data breaches and non-compliance with such laws that may increase data breach litigation and/or our susceptibility to fines or penalties from a regulator. Further, while we are using internal and external resources to monitor compliance with these laws, and continue to modify our data processing practices and policies in order to comply with evolving privacy laws, relevant regulatory authorities could disagree with our interpretation of these laws and determine that our data processing practices, or those of our borrowers and/or operators fail to address all the requirements of certain new laws, which could subject us to penalties and/or litigation. In addition, there is no assurance that our security controls over personal data, the training of employees and vendors on data privacy and data security, and the policies, procedures and practices we implemented or may implement in the future will prevent the improper disclosure of personal data.
Improper use or disclosure of personal data in violation of HIPAA and/or of other personal data protection laws could harm our reputation and cause loss of consumer confidence, either of which could have a material effect on our financial position. New privacy and security laws further could require substantial further investment in resources to comply with regulatory changes as privacy and security laws proliferate in divergent ways or impose additional obligations.
The Federal Trade Commission also has been pursuing privacy as an enforcement priority, including unfair or deceptive practices relating to privacy policies, consumer data collection and processing consent, and digital advertising practices. In addition, healthcare providers and industry participants are subject to a growing number of requirements intended to promote the interoperability and exchange of patient information. Noncompliance may result in penalties or other disincentives.
Americans with Disabilities Act. Our properties generally must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and any similar state or local laws to the extent that such properties are public accommodations as defined in those statutes. The ADA may require removal of barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. While under our triple-net lease structure, our tenants would generally be responsible for additional costs that may be required to make our facilities ADA-compliant, should barriers to access by persons with disabilities be discovered, we may be indirectly responsible for additional costs that may be required to make facilities ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Our commitment to make readily achievable accommodations pursuant to the ADA is ongoing, and we continue to assess our properties and make modifications as appropriate in this respect.
Environmental Regulations. As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters. These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel, oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. We may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property that we own from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. Under the terms of our triple-net leases, we generally have a right to indemnification by our tenants, for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any such inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.
Tax Regulation
17
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and since our formation, have filed our U.S. federal income tax return as a REIT. We believe that we have met the requirements for qualification as a REIT since our initial REIT election in 1991, and we expect to qualify as such for each of our taxable years. Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating results, the various qualification tests and organizational requirements imposed under the Internal Revenue Code, including qualification tests based on NHI’s assets, income, distributions and stock ownership. Provided we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal corporate income taxes on our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or our net capital gain or loss) that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” that ordinarily results from investment in a C corporation. We will, however, be required to pay U.S. federal income tax in certain circumstances.
The sections of the Internal Revenue Code relating to qualification and operation as a REIT, and the U.S. federal income taxation of a REIT and its stockholders, are highly technical and complex. Some of the requirements depend upon actual operating results, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership, asset composition, source of income and record keeping. Accordingly, while we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, the actual results of our operations for any particular year might not satisfy these requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of our operation for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements. Further, the anticipated U.S. federal income tax treatment may be changed, perhaps retroactively, by legislative, administrative or judicial action at any time.
To qualify as a REIT, we must elect to be treated as a REIT, and we must meet various (a) organizational requirements, (b) gross income tests, (c) asset tests, and (d) annual dividend requirements.
Organizational Requirements. The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:
(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
(2) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;
(3) that would otherwise be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for Sections 856 through 859 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company to which certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code apply;
(5) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;
(6) during the last half of each taxable year, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or constructively, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to also include certain entities; and
(7) which meets certain other tests regarding the nature of its income and assets.
We believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner that has allowed us, and will continue to allow us, to satisfy conditions (1) through (7) inclusive, during the relevant time periods, and we intend to continue to be organized and operate in this manner. However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code, including through actual operating results, asset composition, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be organized or will be able to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.
Income Test. We must satisfy two gross income tests annually to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
First, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) must consist of defined types of income that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or qualified temporary investment income. Qualifying income for purposes of that 75% gross income test generally includes:
•rents from real property;
18
•interest on debt secured by mortgages on real property, or on interests in real property (including interest on an obligation secured by a mortgage on both real property and personal property if the fair market value of the personal property does not exceed 15% of the total fair market value of all the property securing the obligation);
•dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of, shares in other REITs;
•gain from the sale of real estate assets; and
•income derived from the temporary investment of new capital that is attributable to the issuance of our shares of beneficial interest or a public offering of our debt with a maturity date of at least five years and that we receive during the one-year period beginning on the date on which we received such new capital.
Second, in general, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) must consist of income that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, other types of interest and dividends, gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities or any combination of these.
Asset Test. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we also must satisfy the following asset tests at the end of each quarter of each taxable year:
•First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets must consist of: (a) cash or cash items, including certain receivables, (b) government securities, (c) real estate assets, including interests in real property, leaseholds and options to acquire real property and leaseholds, (d) interests in mortgages on real property (including an interest in an obligation secured by a mortgage on both real property and personal property if the fair market value of the personal property does not exceed 15% of the total fair market value of all the property securing the obligation) or on interests in real property, (e) stock in other REITs, (f) debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs (i.e., REITs which are required to file annual and periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1943, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), (g) personal property leased in connection with real property to the extent that rents attributable to such personal property do not exceed 15% of the total rent received under the lease and are treated as “rents from real property”; and (h) investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year period following our receipt of new capital that we raise through equity offerings or offerings of debt with at least a five year term;
•Second, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class, the value of our interest in any one issuer’s securities may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets;
•Third, we may not own more than 10% of the voting power or value of any one issuer’s outstanding securities;
•Fourth, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets may consist of the securities of one or more TRSs;
•Fifth, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may consist of the securities of TRSs and other non-TRS taxable subsidiaries and other assets that are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test; and
•Sixth, no more than 25% of our total assets may consist of debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs that qualify as “real estate assets” only because of the express inclusion of “debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs” in the definition of “real estate assets”.
Distribution Requirements. Each taxable year, we must distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our stockholders in an aggregate amount not less than: the sum of (a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income,” computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or our net capital gain or loss, and (b) 90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property, minus the sum of certain items of non-cash income.
Taxable REIT Subsidiary. A REIT may directly or indirectly own stock in a TRS. A TRS may be any corporation in which we directly or indirectly own stock and where both NHI and the subsidiary make a joint election to treat the corporation as a TRS, in which case it is treated separately from us and will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income taxation. Our stock, if any, of a TRS is not subject to the 10% or 5% asset tests. Instead, the value of all TRSs owned by us cannot exceed 20% of the value of our assets. We currently own all of the membership interests of NHI-SS TRS, LLC, a TRS and may form additional TRSs in the future.
We also lease “qualified healthcare properties” on an arm’s-length basis to a TRS (or subsidiary thereof) and the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an “independent contractor” and who is, or is related to a person who is, actively engaged in the trade or business of operating healthcare facilities for any person unrelated to us or our TRS. Generally, the rent that we receive from our TRS in such structures will be treated as “rents from real property.”
19
Subsidiary REITs. We, along with our TRS, currently own all of the common interests in NHI PropCo Member LLC, an entity that will elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Subsidiary REIT”) and we may own and acquire direct or indirect interests in additional Subsidiary REITs in the future. We believe that the Subsidiary REIT is organized and operates in a manner that permits it to qualify for taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the Subsidiary REIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, then (i) the Subsidiary REIT would become subject to regular U.S. corporate income tax and (ii) our equity interest in the Subsidiary REIT would cease to be a qualifying real estate asset for purposes of the 75% asset test and could become subject to the 5% asset test, the 10% voting share asset test, and the 10% value asset test generally applicable to our ownership in corporations other than REITs, qualified REIT subsidiaries (“QRSs”) and TRSs. If the Subsidiary REIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT and if we were not able to treat the Subsidiary REIT as a TRS of ours pursuant to certain prophylactic elections we have made, it is possible that we would not meet the 10% voting share test and the 10% value test with respect to our interest in the Subsidiary REIT, in which event we could fail to qualify as a REIT unless we could avail ourselves of certain relief provisions.
Failure to Qualify. If we lose our status as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:
•We would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate applicable to regular C corporations on our taxable income, determined without reduction for amounts distributed to stockholders;
•For tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, we would possibly be subject to certain taxes enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 that are applicable to non-REIT corporations, including the nondeductible 1% excise tax on certain stock repurchases;
•We would not be required to make any distributions to stockholders, and any dividends to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits (which may be subject to tax at preferential rates to individual stockholders); and
•Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.
In the event we are no longer required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, this could adversely affect the value of our common stock. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT”.
Investment Policies
Our investment objectives are to (i) provide consistent and growing current income for distribution to our stockholders through investments primarily in healthcare-related facilities or in the operations thereof through independent third-party management, (ii) provide the opportunity to realize capital growth resulting from appreciation, if any, in the residual value of our portfolio properties, and (iii) preserve and protect stockholders’ capital through a balance of diversity, flexibility and liquidity. There can be no assurance that these objectives will be realized. Our investment policies include making investments in real estate, mortgage and other notes receivable, and joint ventures structured to comply with the provisions of RIDEA. We consider the creditworthiness of the operator to be an important factor in underwriting the lease or loan investment, and we generally have the right to approve any changes in operators.
During 2022, we made commitments to fund new investments in real estate and loans totaling approximately $101.5 million. In making new investments, we consider such factors as (i) the geographic area and type of property, (ii) the location, construction quality, condition and design of the property, (iii) the current and anticipated cash flow and its adequacy to meet operational needs, and lease or mortgage obligations to provide a competitive income return to our investors, (iv) the growth, tax and regulatory environments of the communities in which the properties are located, (v) occupancy and demand for similar facilities in the same or nearby communities, (vi) the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the management operating the facilities located on the property and (vii) the mix of private and government-sponsored residents. There can be no assurances that investments meeting our standards regarding these attributes will be found or closed. Our intention is to make investments in properties with substantial, long-term potential. However, we may choose to sell properties if they no longer meet our investment objectives.
20
We will not, without the approval of a majority of the Board of Directors and review of a committee comprised of disinterested directors, enter into any joint venture or partnership relationships with or acquire from or sell to any director, officer or employee of NHI, or any affiliate thereof, as the case may be, any of our assets or other property.
The Board of Directors, without the approval of the stockholders, may alter our investment policies if it determines that such a change is in our best interests and our stockholders’ best interests. The methods of implementing our investment policies may vary as new investment and financing techniques are developed or for other reasons. Management may recommend changes in investment criteria from time to time.
Our investments in healthcare-related facilities may utilize borrowed funds or the issuance of equity. We may negotiate lines of credit or arrange for other short or long-term borrowings from lenders. We may arrange for long-term borrowings from institutional investors or through public offerings. We have previously invested, and may in the future invest, in properties subject to existing loans or secured by mortgages, deeds of trust or similar liens with favorable terms or in mortgage investment pools.
Investor Information
We publish our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports on our website at www.nhireit.com. We have a policy of publishing these on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after filing them with, or furnishing them to, the SEC. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The SEC also maintains reports, proxy statements, information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically at http://www.sec.gov.
We also maintain the following documents on our website:
▪The NHI Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which has been adopted for all employees, officers and directors of the Company.
▪Information on our “NHI EthicsPoint” which allows all interested parties to communicate with NHI executive officers and directors. The toll free number is 877-880-2974 and the communications may be made anonymously, if desired.
▪The NHI Restated Audit Committee Charter.
▪The NHI Revised Compensation Committee Charter.
▪The NHI Revised Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.
▪The NHI Corporate Governance Guidelines.
We will furnish, free of charge, a copy of any of the above documents to any interested investor upon receipt of a written request.
Our transfer agent is Computershare. Computershare will assist registered owners with the NHI Dividend Reinvestment plan, change of address, transfer of ownership, payment of dividends, replacement of lost checks or stock certificates. Computershare’s contact information is: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. The toll free number is 800-568-3476 and the website is www.computershare.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are many significant factors that could materially adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, distributions and stock price. The following are risks we believe are material to our stockholders. There may be additional risks and uncertainties that we have not presently identified or have not deemed material. Some of the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Risks Related to Our Managers, Tenants and Borrowers
Actual or perceived risks associated with public health epidemics or outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have had and may in the future have a material adverse effect on our operators’ business and results of operations.
21
The business and results of operations of the operators of our properties and the Company have been and may continue to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and could in the future be adversely affected by other pandemics, epidemics, outbreaks of infectious disease or other public health crises. Our tenants and borrowers provide services to individual consumers, the majority of whom may be more vulnerable than the general population during a public health crisis due to their age, complex medical conditions, or other socioeconomic factors. For example, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, older adults and people with certain underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for serious illness and death from COVID-19. Although vaccines and booster shots for the COVID-19 virus are widely available in the United States, COVID-19 continues to result in a significant number of hospitalizations. In addition, there are uncertainties about the efficacy of the vaccines against the growing number of COVID-19 variants.
Revenues for the tenants and operators of our properties are significantly impacted by occupancy. A public health crisis may diminish the public trust in senior housing properties or medical facilities, especially those that have treated or house consumers affected by contagious diseases, which may result in a decline in consumers seeking services offered through our properties. Building occupancy rates at several of our properties has decreased significantly in comparison to pre-pandemic levels for a variety of reasons tied to COVID-19, including potential occupants’ postponement of moving to a senior housing facility due to perceived risks of community living arrangements. Such decreased occupancy is likely to continue in 2023, and could be further impacted by federal initiatives intended to reduce the number of multi-occupancy rooms in SNFs. In addition, actions our operators take to address COVID-19 have materially increased their operating costs, in comparison to pre-pandemic levels, and a future health crisis may also result in increased operating costs. Such costs include those related to enhanced health and safety precautions and increased retention and recruitment labor costs among other measures. A decrease in occupancy or increase in costs is likely to have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants and operators to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, including the payment of rent, as well as on our results of operations. In some cases, we have had to, and may continue to have to, write-off unpaid rental payments, incur lease accounting charges due to the uncollectibility of rental payments and/or restructure our tenants’ and operators’ long-term rent obligations. In response to requests by operators adversely impacted by COVID-19, we provided pandemic-related rent concessions totaling $10.7 million during 2022. Furthermore, infections at our facilities could lead to material increases in litigation costs for which our operators, or possibly we, may be liable.
The federal, state and local governments have implemented assistance programs in connection with COVID-19 that have benefited certain of our tenants and operators, but such government assistance may be insufficient to offset the downturn in business of our tenants and operators. In addition, federal and state governments and local health authorities have imposed measures intended to limit the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate the burden on the healthcare system, which have increased or may in the future increase operating costs for our tenants, managers and borrowers. For example, a CMS regulation requires COVID-19 vaccinations for workers in most Medicare- and Medicaid-certified providers and suppliers, including hospitals and long-term care facilities such as SNFs. This vaccine mandate may result in heightened labor challenges for our tenants, managers and borrowers. Labor challenges may be exacerbated because the staff of our tenants and borrowers may be at greater risk of contracting contagious diseases due to their frequent exposure to vulnerable patients.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve. The continuation of, or any increase in the severity of, the COVID-19 pandemic, including the possibility of new COVID-19 variants, could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ business and results of operations. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact our business and results of operations will depend on future developments related to the pandemic, such as the duration and severity of the pandemic, the acceptance and distribution of effective medical treatments and vaccines (including additional doses of vaccines) and the impact of government actions affecting the healthcare industry and broader economy. In addition, a future pandemic or similar public health emergency, and the public’s and government’s response to any such future public health crisis, could have a material, adverse effect on our business.
We depend on the operating success of our tenants, managers and borrowers and if their financial condition or business prospects deteriorate, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on our tenants, managers and borrowers and their ability to perform their obligations to us,. Any of our tenants, managers or borrowers may experience a weakening in their overall financial condition, including as a result of deteriorating operating performance, changes in industry or market conditions, including rising interest rates or inflation, or other factors. If their financial condition deteriorates, they may be unable or unwilling to make payments or perform their obligations to us in a timely manner if at all.
Revenues for the operators of our properties are primarily driven by occupancy and reimbursement by Medicare, Medicaid and private payor. Revenues from government reimbursement have, and may continue to, come under pressure due to
22
reimbursement cuts resulting from federal and state budget shortfalls and constraints. Periods of weak economic growth in the U.S. which affect housing sales, investment returns and personal incomes may adversely affect senior housing occupancy rates. An oversupply of senior housing real estate may also apply downward pressure to the occupancy rates of our operators. Expenses for the facilities are driven by the costs of labor, food, utilities, taxes, insurance and rent or debt service. Liability insurance and staffing costs continue to increase for our operators. Historically low unemployment has created significant wage pressure for our operators.
In addition, inflation, both real and anticipated as well as any resulting governmental policies, could adversely affect the economy and the costs of labor, goods and services for our operators. Because our operators are typically required to pay all property operating expenses, increases in property-level expenses at our leased properties generally do not directly affect us. Increased operating costs could have an adverse impact on our operators if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in their revenue, which may adversely affect their ability to pay rent owed to us. An increase in our operators’ expenses and a failure of their revenues to increase at least with inflation could adversely affect our operators’ and our financial condition and our results of operations.
To the extent any decrease in revenues and/or any increase in operating expenses of our operators results in a property not generating enough cash to make scheduled payments to us, our revenues, net income and funds from operations would be adversely affected. Such events and circumstances would cause us to evaluate whether there was an impairment of the real estate or mortgage loan that should be charged to earnings. Such impairment would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeded its fair value. Consequently, we might be unable to maintain or increase our current dividend and the market price of our stock may decline.
We are exposed to the risk that our managers, tenants and borrowers may become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings.
Although our lease agreements provide us the right to evict a tenant/operator and demand immediate payment of rent and exercise other remedies, and our mortgage loans provide us the right to terminate any funding obligations, demand immediate repayment of principal and unpaid interest, foreclose on the collateral and exercise other remedies, the bankruptcy laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. A tenant or borrower in bankruptcy may be able to limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent in the case of a lease or to receive unpaid principal and/or interest in the case of a mortgage loan and to exercise other rights and remedies. For example, a tenant may reject its lease with us in a bankruptcy proceeding. In such a case, our claim against the tenant for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a tenant may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that its lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement. If such a claim is successful, our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, are generally more limited. We may be required to fund certain expenses (e.g. real estate taxes, maintenance and capital improvements) to preserve the value of a property, avoid the imposition of liens on a property and/or transition a property to a new tenant or borrower. In some instances, we have terminated our lease with a tenant and leased the facility to another tenant. In certain of those situations, we provided working capital loans to, and limited indemnification of, the new tenant. If we cannot transition a leased facility to a new tenant, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain successor liabilities. Should such events occur, our revenue and operating cash flow may be adversely affected.
Certain tenants in our portfolio account for a significant percentage of the rent we expect to generate from our portfolio, and the failure of any of these tenants to meet their obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants/operators. For the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately 30% of our total revenue is generated by two tenants, including Senior Living (18%), and NHC (13%). Payment defaults or a decline in the operating performance by these or other tenants/operators could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay expected dividends to our stockholders. As previously disclosed, we received no rent due under a master lease from a Welltower-controlled subsidiary, which master lease represented 12% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, after a change in tenant ownership occurred in late July 2021. Following the filing of a lawsuit, NHI was able to settle the dispute and terminate the master lease with respect to these properties effective April 1, 2022. In the event of another tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we may not be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, or at all, or lease terminations may cause us to sell the property at a loss. The result of any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
23
Two members of our Board of Directors are also members of the board of directors of NHC, and their interests may differ from those of our stockholders.
Two of our board members, including our chairman of the Board of Directors, are also members of NHC’s board of directors. Those directors may have conflicting interests with holders of the Company’s common stock with respect to the NHC properties. During the year ended December 31, 2022, revenue from NHC represented 13% of our total revenue. With respect to all decisions by our Board of Directors related to the NHC properties, the two directors that are also members of NHC’s board of directors are recused and do not participate in the NHI Board discussions or vote related to such matters. However, these relationships could influence the Board of Director’s decisions in with respect to the properties leased to and operated by NHC. As of December 31, 2022, NHC owned 1,630,642 shares (approximately 4%) of our common stock.
We are exposed to risks related to governmental regulations and payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid, and the effect of changes to laws, regulations and reimbursement rates on our tenants’ and borrowers’ business.
Our tenants, managers and borrowers are subject to complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to governmental healthcare programs. See “Item 1. Business - Government Regulation.” Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure; certification and enrollment with government programs; facility operations; addition or expansion of facilities; services and equipment; allowable costs; the preparation and filing of cost reports; privacy and security of health related and other personal information; prices for services; quality of medical equipment and services; necessity and adequacy of medical care, patient rights, billing and coding for services and properly handling overpayments; maintenance of adequate records; relationships with physicians and other referrals sources and referral recipients; debt collection; communications with patients and consumers; interoperability; and information blocking. If our tenants, operators or borrowers fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, they may be subject to liabilities and other consequences including civil penalties, loss of facility licensure, exclusion from participation in the Medicare, Medicaid, and other government healthcare programs, civil lawsuits and criminal penalties. In addition, different interpretations or enforcement of, or changes to, applicable laws and regulations in the future could subject current or past practices to allegations of illegality or impropriety or could require our tenants, managers and borrowers to make changes to their facilities, equipment, personnel, services, and operating expenses If the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our tenants, operators and/or borrowers are materially adversely impacted by current or future government regulation, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected as well. In addition, if an operator, borrower or tenant defaults on its lease or loan with us, our ability to replace the operator or tenant may be delayed by federal, state, or local approval processes.
Our tenants’, operators’ and borrowers’ businesses are also affected by government and private payor reimbursement. Payments from government programs and private payors are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, administrative rulings, policy interpretations, payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries, government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities) and interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits at such facilities. In recent years, legislative and regulatory changes have resulted in limitations and reductions in payments for certain services under government programs. For example, as a result of federal deficit reduction initiatives, Medicare reimbursement is subject to automatic, across-the-board spending reductions known as sequestration. Several states face budgetary pressures that have resulted, and will likely continue to result, in reduced Medicaid funding, through such measures as tightening patient eligibility requirements, reducing coverage, and enrolling Medicaid recipients in managed care programs. In addition, CMS may implement or oversee changes through new or modified demonstration projects, including those authorized pursuant to Medicaid waivers.
Any reductions in Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement could have an adverse effect on the financial operations of our borrowers, operators and tenants who operate SNFs. Further, reductions in payments under government healthcare programs may negatively impact payments from private payors, as some private payors rely on government payment systems to determine payment rates. There can be no assurance that adequate reimbursement levels will continue to be available for services provided by any facility operator, whether the facility receives reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid or private payor sources. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material adverse effect on an operator’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, which could adversely affect the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.
More generally, the legislative and regulatory environment for healthcare products and services is dynamic, and Congress and certain state legislatures have considered or enacted a large number of laws and regulations intended to make major
24
changes in the healthcare system, including laws that affect how healthcare services are delivered and reimbursed. Recent government initiatives and proposals relevant to our properties include those focused on transparency of SNF ownership and minimum SNF staffing requirements. Other industry participants, such as private payors, may also introduce financial or delivery system reforms. There is uncertainty with regard to whether, when and what health reform initiatives will be adopted in the future and the impact of such reform efforts on providers and other healthcare industry participants, including our tenants, managers and borrowers.
We are exposed to the risk that the cash flows of our tenants, managers and borrowers may be adversely affected by increased liability claims and liability insurance costs.
ALF and SNF operators have experienced substantial increases in both the number and size of patient care liability claims in recent years. As a result, general and professional liability costs have increased and may continue to increase. Nationwide, long-term care liability insurance rates are increasing because of large jury awards in states like Texas and Florida. Both Texas and Florida have now adopted SNF liability laws that modify or limit tort damages. Despite some of these reforms, the long-term care industry overall continues to experience very high general and professional liability costs. Insurance companies have responded to this claims crisis by severely restricting their capacity to write long-term care general and professional liability policies. No assurance can be given that the climate for long-term care general and professional liability insurance will improve in either of the foregoing states or any other states where the facilities operators conduct business. Insurance companies may continue to reduce or stop writing general and professional liability policies for ALFs and SNFs. Thus, general and professional liability insurance coverage may be restricted, very costly or not available. Increased general and professional liability costs, may adversely affect our tenants’ or operators’ future operations, cash flows and financial condition and may have a material adverse effect on the tenants’ or operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.
We are exposed to the risk that we may not be fully indemnified by our tenants, managers and borrowers against future litigation.
Our leases and notes require that the tenant/manager/borrowers name us as an additional insured party on their insurance policies covering professional liability or personal injury claims. These instruments also require the tenant/borrower to indemnify and hold us harmless for all claims arising out of or incidental to the occupancy and use of each facility. However, claims could exceed the policy limits, the insurance company could fail or coverage may not otherwise be available. We cannot give any assurance that these protective measures will completely eliminate any risk to us related to future litigation, the costs of which could have a material adverse impact on us.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
We depend on the success of property development and construction activities, which may fail to achieve the operating results we expect.
When we decide to invest in the renovation of an existing property or in the development of a new property, we make assumptions about the future potential cash flows of that property. We estimate our return based on expected occupancy, rental rates and future capital costs. If our projections prove to be inaccurate due to increased capital costs, lower occupancy or other factors, our investment in that property may not generate the cash flow we expected. Construction and development projects involve risks such as (i) development of a project could be abandoned after expending significant resources resulting in loss of deposits or failure to recover expenses already incurred; (ii) development and construction costs of a project could exceed original estimates due to increased interest rates and higher material costs; (iii) project delays could results in increases in construction costs and debt service expenses as a result of a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including natural disasters, labor conditions, material shortages, and regulatory hurdles; and (iv) financing for a project could be unavailable on favorable terms or at all. Recently developed properties may take longer than expected to achieve stabilized operating levels, if at all. To the extent such facilities experience such increases in cost or delays in construction or financing, or otherwise fail to reach stabilized operating levels or achieve stabilization later than expected, it could materially adversely affect our tenants’ abilities to make payments to us under their leases and thus adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk that the illiquidity of real estate investments could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions, including rising interest rates, may be limited. All of our properties are "special purpose" properties that cannot be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Facilities that participate in Medicare or Medicaid must meet extensive program requirements, including physical plant and operational requirements.
25
Transfers of operations of facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of real estate. Thus, if the operation of any of our properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of improvements or other factors such that our tenant or borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the lease or mortgage loan, the liquidation value of the property may be less than the net book value or the amount owed on any related mortgage loan, because the property may not be readily adaptable to other uses. The sale of the property or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could also be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the property or the replacement of the operator with a new operator licensed to manage the facility. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any property that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Should such events occur, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We are exposed to risks associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on the financial condition of other interests.
Our investments in unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority regarding major decisions, our reliance on the financial condition of other interests, any disputes that may arise between us and other partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of partners. Risks of dealing with parties outside NHI include limitations on unilateral major decisions opposed by other interests, the prospect of divergent goals of ownership including disputes regarding management, ownership or disposition of a property, or limitations on the transfer of our interests without the consent of our partners. Risks of the unconsolidated entity extend to areas in which the financial health of our partners may impact our plans. Our partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which may hinder significant action in the entity. We may disagree with our partners about decisions affecting a property or the entity itself, which could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and finally, we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our partners with respect to our investments.
We are subject to risks associated with our joint venture investment with Life Care Services for Timber Ridge, an entrance fee CCRC, associated with Type A benefits offered to the residents of the joint venture's entrance fee community and related accounting requirements.
Effective January 31, 2020, we entered into a joint venture with Life Care Services (“LCS”) which consists of two parts, NHI-LCS JV I, LLC (“Timber Ridge PropCo”), which owns the real estate and is owned 80% by NHI and 20% by LCS, and Timber Ridge OpCo, LLC (“Timber Ridge OpCo”) which operates the property and is owned 25% by NHI’s TRS and 75% by LCS. Rents received from the Timber Ridge OpCo in the RIDEA structure are treated as qualifying rents from real property for REIT tax purposes only if (i) they are paid pursuant to a lease of a “qualified healthcare property” and (ii) the operator qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor,” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. If either of these requirements are not satisfied, then the rents will not be qualifying rents.
As part of acquisition of the real estate in January 2020, Timber Ridge PropCo accepted the property subject to trust liens previously granted to residents of Timber Ridge. Beginning in 2008, early residents of Timber Ridge executed loans to the then owner/operators backed by liens and entered into a Deed of Trust and Indenture of Trust (the “Deed and Indenture”) for the benefit of the trustee on behalf of all residents who made mortgage loans to the owner/operator in accordance with a resident agreement. The Deed and Indenture granted a security interest in the Timber Ridge property to secure the loans made by the early residents of the property this practice was discontinued at Timber Ridge in 2008, prior to our investment. However, the remaining outstanding “old” loans made by the residents are still secured by a security interest in the Timber Ridge property. The trustee for all of the residents who made “old” loans in accordance with the resident agreements entered into a subordination agreement concurrent with Timber Ridge PropCo’s acquisition of the property, pursuant to which the trustee acknowledged and confirmed that the security interests created under the Deed and Indenture were subordinate to any security interests granted in connection with the loan made by NHI to Timber Ridge PropCo. With the periodic settlement of some of the outstanding resident loans in the course of normal entrance-fee community operations by Timber Ridge OpCo, the balance owing on the Deed and Indenture at December 31, 2022 was $13.6 million. By terms of the resident loan assumption agreement, during the term of the lease (seven years with two renewal options), Timber Ridge OpCo is to indemnify Timber Ridge PropCo for any repayment by Timber Ridge PropCo of these liabilities under the guarantee. We cannot give any assurance that these protective measures will completely eliminate any risk to us related to claims under the Deed and Indenture.
As a result of the RIDEA structure, we have an investment in the operations of Timber Ridge. Timber Ridge is a Class A quality, Type A care CCRC. A Type A entrance fee community generally means the care of the resident is provided for upon payment of an entrance fee and thereafter payment of a monthly set service fee. The entrance fee is divided into a refundable and non-refundable portion depending upon the resident’s chosen contract program. The service fee is determined at the time of
26
move-in into an IL unit and is subject to certain inflation-based adjustments regardless of the resident’s future care needs. A resident must move into an IL unit initially and not require care at the time of move-in. However, thereafter the resident’s care requirements from assisted living to memory care to skilled nursing are provided for. The refundable portion of the upfront entrance fee is recorded as a liability on the financial statements of Timber Ridge OpCo. The non-refundable portion of the upfront entrance fee is recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over the actuarial life of the resident. We believe the structure of the joint venture does not require that Timber Ridge OpCo’s financial statements be consolidated into NHI, but if we are unable to properly maintain that structure or become required for any reason to consolidate Timber Ridge OpCo’s financial statements into ours, the results would have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We are subject to additional risks related to healthcare operations associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Since January 31, 2020, we have one investment in an unconsolidated entity, Timber Ridge OpCo. As such, we are exposed to various operational risks with respect to this investment that may increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to increase revenues. These risks include fluctuations in resident occupancy, operating expenses, and economic conditions; competition; certification and inspection laws, regulations, and standards; the availability of and increases in cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage; litigation; federal, state and local taxes and regulations; costs associated with government investigations and enforcement actions; the availability and increases in cost of labor; and other risks applicable to any operating business. Any one or a combination of these factors may adversely affect our revenue and operations.
COVID-19 has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our overall business and financial performance.
COVID-19 has caused, and may continue to cause, severe economic, market and other disruptions worldwide. We cannot assure you that conditions in the bank lending, capital and other financial markets will not continue to deteriorate as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings. Such future constraints could increase our borrowing costs, which would make it more difficult or expensive to obtain additional financing or refinance existing obligations and commitments.
The impact of COVID-19 on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends at expected levels or at all. All dividends are made at the discretion of our Board of Directors in accordance with Maryland law and depend on our earnings, our financial condition, debt and equity capital available to us, our expectation of our future capital requirements and operating performance, restrictive covenants in our financial and other contractual arrangements, maintenance of our REIT qualification, restrictions under Maryland law and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. Our Board of Directors will continue to assess our dividend rate on an ongoing basis, as COVID-19 and related market conditions and our financial position continue to evolve.
We are exposed to operational risks with respect to our SHOP structured communities.
During 2022, we transitioned 15 of our former Holiday properties to be SHOP structured communities. Our SHOP structured communities expose us to various operational risks that may increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues. As the owner of a property under a SHOP structure, we are ultimately responsible for all operational risks and other liabilities of the property, other than those arising out of certain actions by our manager, such as gross negligence or willful misconduct. Operational risks include, and our resulting revenues therefore depend on, among other things: (i) occupancy rates; (ii) rental rates charged to residents; (iii) our operators’ reputations and ability to attract and retain residents; (iv) general economic conditions and market factors that impact seniors including those exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic; (v) competition from other senior housing providers; (vi) compliance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations and industry standards; (vii) litigation involving our properties or residents, including but not limited to litigation related to COVID-19; (viii) the availability and cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage or increases in insurance policy deductibles; and (ix) the ability to control operating expenses, which have increased, and may continue to increase, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the success of our SHOP structured communities will depend largely on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with our managers. Although the SHOP structure gives us certain oversight approval rights (e.g., budgets, material contracts, etc.) and the right to review operational and financial reporting information, we have outsourced to our third-party managers the day to day operations of the communities. Therefore, we are dependent on our managers to operate these communities in a manner that complies with applicable law, minimizes legal risk and maximizes the value of our investment. Failure by our managers to adequately manage these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
27
From time to time, disputes may arise between us and our managers regarding their performance or compliance with the terms of the agreements we have entered into with them, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations. We will generally attempt to resolve any such disputes through discussions and negotiations; however, if we are unable to reach satisfactory results through discussions and negotiations, we may choose to terminate the applicable agreement, litigate the dispute or submit the matter to third-party dispute resolution, the outcome of which may be unfavorable to us.
In the event that any of the agreements with our managers are terminated, we can provide no assurances that we could find a replacement manager or that any replacement manager will be successful in managing our SHOP structured communities.
Breaches of, disruptions to, or other unauthorized interference with the privacy and security of Company information could cause us to incur substantial costs and reputational damage, and could become subject to litigation and enforcement actions.
Our business, like that of other REITs, involves the receipt, storage and transmission of information about our Company, our tenants, managers and borrowers, and our employees, some of which is entrusted to third-party service providers and vendors. We also work with third-party service providers and vendors to provide technology, systems and services that we use in connection with the receipt, storage and transmission of this information. As a matter of course, we may store or process the personal data of employees and other persons as required to provide our services and such personal data or other data may be hosted or exchanged with our partners and other third-party providers.
As with all companies that utilize information systems, our information systems, and those of our third-party service providers and vendors, may be vulnerable to continually evolving cybersecurity risks. We employ industry standard administrative, technical and physical safeguards designed to protect the integrity and security of personal data we collect or process. We have implemented and regularly review and update processes and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of secured data and to prevent data loss. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to these systems or our information through fraud or deception of our associates, third-party service providers or vendors. Hardware, software or applications we obtain from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. The methods used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems are also constantly changing and evolving and may be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time. The ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes, and there is no guarantee that they will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches or misuses of data. Despite the security measures we have in place, and any additional measures we may implement in the future, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, could be vulnerable to service interruptions, outages, cyber-attacks and security breaches and incidents, human error, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, pandemics, fires, other natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks and other geopolitical unrest, computer viruses, ransomware, and other malicious software, changes in social, political, or regulatory conditions or in laws and policies, or other changes or events.
Any significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of our data, could disrupt our operations, result in significant costs, fines and lawsuits, harm our business relationships, increase our security and insurance costs and damage our reputation. Moreover, any significant cybersecurity events could require us to devote significant management resources to address the problems created by such events, interfere with the pursuit of other important business strategies and initiatives, and cause us to incur additional expenditures, which could be material, including to investigate such events, remedy cybersecurity problems, recover lost data, prevent future compromises and adapt systems and practices in response to such events. There is no assurance that any remedial actions will meaningfully limit the success of future attempts to breach our information technology systems.
In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in significant additional costs.
We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances.
Under various federal and state laws, owners or operators of real property may be required to respond to the release of hazardous substances on the property and may be held liable for property damage, personal injuries or penalties that result from environmental contamination of currently or formerly owned real estate, often regardless of knowledge of or responsibility for the contamination. These laws also expose us to the possibility that we may become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Generally, such liability attaches to a person based on the
28
person’s relationship to the property. Although our tenants and operators are primarily responsible for the condition of the property they occupy, we also could be held liable to a governmental authority or to third parties for property damage, personal injuries, and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination or we could be required to incur additional costs to change how the property is constructed or operated due to presence of such substances. However, we review environmental site assessment of the properties that we purchase or encumber prior to taking an interest in them. Those assessments are designed to meet the “all appropriate inquiry” standard, which qualifies us for the innocent purchaser defense if environmental liabilities arise. Notwithstanding these assessments, however, environmental liabilities, including mold, may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances or a failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination could adversely affect our ability to lease, mortgage, or sell an affected property.
We are subject to risks of damage from catastrophic weather and other natural or man-made disasters and the physical effects of climate change.
Natural and man-made disasters, including terrorist attacks and acts of nature such as hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, flooding and wildfires, may cause damage to our properties or business disruption to our tenants, managers and borrowers. These adverse weather and natural or man-made events could cause substantial damage or loss to our properties which could exceed applicable property insurance coverage. Such events could also have a material adverse impact on our tenants’, operators’ and borrowers’ operations and ability to meet their obligations to us. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable. To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience more frequent extreme weather events which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.
We depend on the success of our future acquisitions and investments.
We are exposed to the risk that our future acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and newly acquired properties might require significant attention of NHI’s management that would otherwise be devoted to our existing business. If we agree to provide construction funding to a borrower and the project is not completed, we may need to take steps to ensure completion of the project. Moreover, if we issue equity securities or incur additional debt, or both, to finance future acquisitions, it may reduce our per share financial results.
We depend on our ability to reinvest cash in real estate investments in a timely manner and on acceptable terms.
From time to time, we will have cash available from principal payments on our notes receivable and the sale of properties, including tenant purchase option exercises, under the terms of master leases or similar financial support arrangements. We must reinvest these proceeds, on a timely basis, in new investments or in qualified short-term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. This competition for attractive investments may negatively affect our ability to make timely investments on terms acceptable to us. Delays in reinvesting our cash may negatively impact revenues and the amount of distributions to stockholders.
Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.
We may face increased competition for acquisition opportunities from other well-capitalized investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private real estate funds, partnerships and others. This may mean that we are unsuccessful in a potential acquisition of a desired property at an acceptable price or, even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price.
We depend on our ability to retain our management team and other personnel and attract suitable replacements should any such personnel leave.
29
The management and governance of the Company depends on the services of certain key personnel, including senior management. The departure of any key personnel could have an adverse effect on the Company and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our senior management team possesses substantial experience and expertise and has strong business relationships with our tenants and operators and other members of the business communities and industries in which we operate. As a result, the loss of these personnel could jeopardize our relationships and operations. We cannot predict the impact that any such departures could have on our ability to achieve our objectives. Furthermore, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets. Other than Mr. Mendelsohn, our Chief Executive Officer, we do not have employment agreements with any of our management team. In addition, we do not have key man insurance on any of our key employees. Our ability to retain and motivate our management team and other personnel and attract suitable replacements should any such personnel leave, could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk that our assets may be subject to impairment charges.
As a REIT, a significant percentage of our assets is invested in real estate. We regularly evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset, which could have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge occurs. Such impairment charges may make it more difficult for us to meet the financial ratios in our indebtedness and may reduce the borrowing base, which may reduce the amounts of cash we would otherwise have available to pay expenses, make dividend distributions, service other indebtedness and operate our business.
In 2022, we recorded impairment charges totaling $51.6 million on 19 properties. In 2021, we recognized impairments of $51.8 million on ten properties.
Our ability to raise capital through equity sales is dependent, in part, on the market price of our common stock, and our failure to meet market expectations with respect to our business, or other factors we do not control, could negatively impact such market price and availability of equity capital.
As of December 31, 2022, we had the potential to access the remaining $415.7 million through the issuance of common stock under our $500.0 million ATM program. In addition, we maintain an effective automatic shelf registration statement through which capital could be raised via the issuance of equity securities. As with other publicly traded companies, the availability of equity capital will depend, in part, on the market price of our common stock which, in turn, will depend upon various market conditions and other factors, some of which we cannot control, that may change from time to time including:
•the extent of investor interest;
•the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;
•the financial performance of us and our tenants, managers and borrowers;
•investment and tenant concentrations in our investment portfolio;
•concerns about our operators’, tenants’ and borrowers’ financial condition due to uncertainty regarding reimbursement from governmental and other third-party payor programs;
•our credit ratings and analyst reports on us and the REIT industry in general, including recommendations, and our ability to meet our guidance estimates or analysts’ estimates;
•general economic, global and market conditions, including changes in interest rates on fixed income securities, which may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to demand a higher annual yield from future distributions;
•our failure to maintain or increase our dividend, which is dependent, to a large part, on the increase in funds from operations, which in turn depends upon increased revenues from additional investments and rental increases; and
•other factors such as governmental regulatory action and changes in REIT tax laws, as well as changes in litigation and regulatory proceedings.
The market value of the equity securities of a REIT is generally based upon the market’s perception of the REIT’s growth potential and its current and potential future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions would likely adversely affect the market price of our common stock and, as a result, the availability of equity capital to us.
Risks Related to Our Debt
30
We may need to refinance existing debt or incur additional debt in the future, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us.
We operate with a policy of incurring debt when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. Currently, we believe that our current liquidity, availability under our unsecured credit facility, potential proceeds from our ATM equity program and our capacity to service additional debt will enable us to meet our obligations, including dividends, and continue to make investments in healthcare real estate. On March 31, 2022, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “2022 Credit Agreement”) providing us with a $700.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, replacing our previous $550.0 million unsecured revolver. The 2022 Credit Agreement matures in March 2026, but may be extended at our option, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional six-month periods. In January 2023, we repaid $125 million in private placement notes upon maturity. As a result, as of January 31, 2023 we have approximately $1.2 billion in outstanding indebtedness and approximately $498.0 million available to draw under our unsecured revolving credit facility. We have a $50.0 million term loan maturing in November 2023 and $240.0 million maturing in September 2023. We may incur additional debt by borrowing under our 2022 Credit Agreement, mortgaging properties we own and/or issuing debt securities in a public offering or in a private transaction. Our ability to raise reasonably priced capital is not guaranteed. We may be unable to raise reasonably priced capital because of reasons related to our business or for reasons beyond our control, such as market conditions and rising interest rates. If our access to capital becomes limited, it could have an impact on our ability to refinance our debt obligations, fund dividend payments, acquire properties and fund acquisition activities.
We have covenants related to our indebtedness which impose certain operational limitations and a breach of those covenants could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The terms of our current indebtedness as well as debt instruments that the Company may enter into in the future are subject to customary financial and operational covenants. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. Our continued ability to incur debt and operate our business is subject to compliance with these covenants, which limit operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in a default under applicable debt instruments, even if payment obligations are satisfied. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from a breach of any of these covenants in our debt instruments, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Downgrades in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital.
We plan to manage the Company to maintain a capital structure consistent with our current profile, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Moody's Investors Services (“Moody's”) announced on October 13, 2022 that it has affirmed the Company’s investment grade issuer credit rating and a senior unsecured debt rating of Baa3 and has revised it with a “Stable” outlook to the Company. Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) reaffirmed its BBB- and “Stable” outlook on the Company on December 9, 2021 and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P Global”) also reaffirmed its BBB- and “Stable” outlook on the Company at November 14, 2022. Any downgrades of ratings or changes to outlooks by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, cash flows, the trading/redemption price of our securities and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay dividends and distributions to our equity holders.
We depend on revenues derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets, while a portion of our debt used to finance those investments bears interest at variable rates.
Our business model assumes that we can earn a spread between the returns earned from our investments in real estate as compared to our cost of debt and/or equity capital. Interest rates have been increasing over the past year and, as a result, the spread and our profitability on our investments have decreased. We are exposed to interest rate risk in the potential for a further narrowing of our spread and profitability if interest rates continue to increase in the future. Certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest rates that vary with the movement of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other indexes. Our revenues are derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets. Although our leases generally contain escalating rent clauses that provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, our interest costs for our existing floating rate debt and any new debt we incur would also increase. This increasing cost of debt could reduce our profitability by increasing the cost of financing our existing portfolio and our investment activity. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing. We manage a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk by accessing debt with staggered maturities and through the use of derivative instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements with major financial institutions. Increased interest rates may also negatively affect the market price of our common stock and increase the cost of new equity capital.
31
We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if we encounter difficulty in obtaining such capital, we may not be able to make future investments necessary to grow our business or meet maturing commitments.
As a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required to, among other things, distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or our net capital gain or loss) each year to our stockholders. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund, from cash retained from operations, all future capital needs, including capital needed to make investments and to satisfy or refinance maturing commitments. As a result, we rely on external sources of capital, including debt and equity financing. If we are unable to obtain needed capital at all or only on unfavorable terms from these sources, we might not be able to make the investments needed to grow our business, or to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature, which could negatively affect the ratings of our debt and even, in extreme circumstances, affect our ability to continue operations. We may not be in a position to take advantage of future investment opportunities in the event that we are unable to access the capital markets on a timely basis or we are only able to obtain financing on unfavorable terms.
Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our cash flows.
Pursuant to our 2022 Credit Agreement and the amendment to the existing term loan agreement, each entered into effective in March 2022, our indebtedness transitioned from bearing interest at a variable interest rate using a LIBOR benchmark to one that uses Term SOFR and Daily SOFR. SOFR is the preferred alternative rate for LIBOR that has been identified by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), a U.S.-based group convened by the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. SOFR is calculated based on short-term repurchase agreements, backed by U.S. Treasury securities. SOFR is calculated differently from LIBOR and has inherent differences, which could give rise to uncertainties, including the limited historical data and volatility in the benchmark rates. Because of these and other differences, there is no assurance that SOFR will perform in the same way as LIBOR would have performed at any time, and there is no guarantee that it is a comparable substitute for LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates, including SOFR, or other reforms may adversely affect the trading market for LIBOR- or SOFR-based securities, including ours. As a result, our interest expense may increase, our ability to refinance some or all of our existing indebtedness may be affected, and our available cash flow may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT
We depend on the ability to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We intend to operate as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe we have and will continue to operate in such a manner. In addition, we currently hold an interest in s Subsidiary REIT (and may in the future own or acquire additional interests in Subsidiary REITs). Since REIT qualification requires us to meet a number of complex requirements, it is possible that we (or our Subsidiary REIT) may fail to fulfill them. If we (or our Subsidiary REIT) fail to qualify as a REIT:
•we (or our Subsidiary REIT) will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income;
•we (or our Subsidiary REIT) will be subject to corporate-level income tax, on taxable income at regular corporate rates;
•we (or our Subsidiary REIT) could be subject to increased state and local income taxes;
•For tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, we (or our Subsidiary REIT) would possibly be subject to certain taxes enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 that are applicable to non-REIT corporations, including the nondeductible 1% excise tax on certain stock repurchases; and
•unless we (or our Subsidiary REIT) are entitled to relief under relevant statutory provisions, we (or our Subsidiary REIT, as applicable) will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we (or our Subsidiary REIT, as applicable) fail to qualify as a REIT.
Because of all these factors, our (or our Subsidiary REIT’s) failure to qualify as a REIT could also impair our ability to expand our business and could materially adversely affect the value of our common stock. The present federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time, which could affect the federal income tax treatment of an investment in us. The federal income tax rules dealing with REITs constantly are under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and the U.S. Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. Revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could affect or cause us to change our investments and commitments and affect the tax considerations of an investment in us.
32
There are no assurances of our ability to pay dividends in the future.
Our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected upon the occurrence of any of the risks described herein. Our payment of dividends is subject to compliance with restrictions contained in our credit agreements, notes and any preferred stock that our Board may from time to time designate and authorize for issuance. All dividends will be paid at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our REIT status and such other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time. There are no assurances of our ability to pay dividends in the future. In addition, our dividends in the past have included, and may in the future include a return of capital.
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments, which could materially hinder our performance.
To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we (and any Subsidiary REIT of ours) must continually satisfy certain tests, including tests concerning the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. To meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments or acquisitions we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may materially hinder our performance.
We believe that the ownership and management of assets in our SHOP structures is in compliance with the REIT requirements; however; application of the REIT rules to such assets is complex, fact dependent and subject to interpretation. There can be no assurances that the IRS will agree with our characterization of these assets and if the IRS were to successfully contend that our SHOP structures do not meet the REIT requirements, all or a portion of the rent that we receive under these structures could be non-qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. In such event we may be required to rely on the REIT savings provisions under the Internal Revenue Code, reorganize our SHOP structures, or take such other steps to avoid incurring non-qualifying income, any of which could be at a significant financial cost.
Our ownership of and relationship with any TRS that we have formed or will form will be limited and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation (other than a REIT) of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns securities possessing more than 35% of the total voting power or total value of the outstanding securities of such corporation will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s total assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs.
Rents received from a TRS in a RIDEA structure are treated as qualifying rents from real property for REIT tax purposes only if (i) they are paid pursuant to a lease of a “qualified healthcare property” and (ii) the operator qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor,” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. If either of these requirements is not satisfied, then the rents will not be qualifying rents. The Internal Revenue Code also imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s length basis. Any domestic TRS that we form will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income, and its after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but is not required to be distributed to us unless necessary to maintain our REIT qualification.
Legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes could adversely affect us or our security holders.
The tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations thereof may be amended at any time. We cannot predict if or when any new or amended law, regulation, or administrative interpretation will be adopted, promulgated, or become effective, and any such change may apply retroactively. We and our security holders may be adversely affected by any new or amended law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.
Investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors with respect to the status of any tax legislation and any other regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on investment in our securities.
Risk Related to Our Organizational Structure
We have ownership limits in our charter with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock which may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
33
Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our common and preferred stock that are intended to assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT. Our charter provides that any transfer that would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void, which, subject to certain exceptions, results in no person or entity being allowed to own, actually or constructively, more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of our stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limit and such an exemption has been granted through Excepted Holder Agreements to members of the Carl E. Adams family. Based on the Excepted Holder Agreements currently outstanding, the individual ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. These ownership limits may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws that could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control transaction, even if the transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe such transaction to be otherwise in their best interests.
The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that, unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10% or more of its assets, issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions with an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter, unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of a Maryland corporation. Unless our Board of Directors takes action to exempt us, generally or with respect to certain transactions, from this statute in the future, the Maryland Business Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations between us and other persons. The Company’s charter and bylaws also contain certain provisions that could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company. These provisions include a staggered board of directors, blank check preferred stock, and the application of Maryland corporate law provisions on business combinations and control shares. Such provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for the common stock. The foregoing matters may, together or separately, have the effect of discouraging or making more difficult an acquisition or change of control of the Company.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
34
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
PROPERTIES OWNED OR ASSOCIATED WITH MORTGAGE LOAN INVESTMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real Estate Investments | SHOP | Gross | Net Operating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Location | SHO | SNF | HOSP | ILF | Investment1 | Income2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Carolina | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | $ | 336,291 | $ | 34,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | — | 21 | — | — | 298,599 | 28,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 3 | 10 | — | — | 224,378 | 26,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee | 3 | 16 | — | — | 50,792 | 16,453 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | 3 | — | — | 1 | 200,530 | 15,127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Connecticut | 3 | — | — | — | 138,877 | 13,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| North Carolina | 6 | — | — | — | 137,141 | 11,096 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Arkansas | — | — | — | 2 | 50,152 | 9,163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oklahoma | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 96,675 | 8,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wisconsin | 2 | 1 | — | — | 49,905 | 7,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Georgia | 2 | — | — | 2 | 96,521 | 6,882 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oregon | 3 | 3 | — | — | 95,259 | 4,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana | 9 | — | — | — | 94,237 | 4,542 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Iowa | 7 | — | — | — | 40,237 | 3,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Massachusetts | 1 | — | — | — | 52,108 | 3,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California | 2 | — | — | 5 | 139,833 | 3,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alabama | 1 | 2 | — | — | 17,260 | 2,945 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Missouri | 1 | 5 | — | — | 27,695 | 2,580 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maryland | 1 | — | — | — | 46,431 | 2,533 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michigan | 5 | — | — | — | 44,138 | 2,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minnesota | 5 | — | — | — | 31,144 | 2,389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nebraska | 3 | — | — | — | 28,682 | 2,133 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Illinois | 13 | — | — | — | 196,481 | 1,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky | — | 1 | — | — | 2,143 | 1,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ohio | 4 | — | — | 1 | 86,753 | 1,290 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Idaho | 1 | — | — | — | 9,673 | 932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Arizona | — | 1 | — | — | 7,131 | 864 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | — | — | — | 1 | 24,919 | 751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania | 2 | — | — | — | 29,367 | 691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado | 1 | — | — | — | 7,600 | 642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | 4 | — | — | — | 15,000 | (71) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia | 4 | 1 | — | — | 51,396 | (2,696) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 94 | 65 | 1 | 15 | 2,727,348 | 215,923 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate office | 2,550 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-geographic | 8,469 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net operating income from properties sold, held for sale and note payoffs | 15,821 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,729,898 | $ | 240,213 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Excludes assets held for sale.
2 Includes interest income and other.
35
PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH MORTGAGE LOAN INVESTMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2022 ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Location | SHO | SNF | Investment | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 1 | — | $ | 10,000 | $ | 583 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana | 3 | — | 10,297 | 727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michigan | 1 | — | 14,700 | 1,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Carolina | 1 | — | 32,700 | 2,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | — | 5 | 42,295 | 384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia | 1 | 3 | 18,181 | 2,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wisconsin | 2 | — | 36,404 | 2,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 8 | $ | 164,577 | 10,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-mortgage income | 13,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income and other | $ | 24,698 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10-YEAR LEASE EXPIRATIONS
The following table provides additional information on our leases which are scheduled to expire based on the maturity contained in the most recent lease agreement or extension.
| Annualized | Percentage of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Number | Gross Rent** | Annualized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year | of Properties | of Units/Beds | ($ in thousands) | Gross Rent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2 | 254 | $ | 3,136 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | — | — | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 1 | 42 | 553 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 35 | 4,897 | 37,481 | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 3 | 619 | 12,432 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 13 | 832 | 11,587 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2029 | 29 | 4,319 | 69,829 | 33.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2030 | 5 | 439 | 1,283 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2031 | 3 | 274 | 4,790 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2032 | 3 | 416 | 5,338 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thereafter | 66 | 5,599 | 63,995 | 30.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
**Annualized Gross Rent refers to the amount of lease revenue that our portfolio would have generated in 2022 if all leases were in effect for the twelve-month calendar year, regardless of the commencement date, maturity date, or renewals.
The above table does not reflect purchase options. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of purchase options.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our healthcare facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our managers, tenants and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. In addition, such claims may include, among other things, professional liability and general liability claims, as well as regulatory proceedings related to our SHOP segment. While there may be lawsuits pending against us and certain of the managers, owners and/or tenants of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no direct material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Welltower, Inc. In June 2021, Welltower announced that it would acquire certain assets from the senior housing portfolio of Holiday, a privately held senior living management company, that included 17 senior living facilities governed by a master lease originally executed between a Holiday subsidiary and NHI in 2013. We received no rent due under the master lease from the tenant for these facilities after this change in tenant ownership occurred in late July 2021.
36
On December 20, 2021, NHI and its subsidiaries NHI-REIT of Next House, LLC, Myrtle Beach Retirement Resident LLC, and Voorhees Retirement Residence LLC filed suit against Welltower, Inc., Welltower Victory II TRS LLC, and Well Churchill Leasehold Owner LLC (collectively the "Defendants") in the Delaware Court of Chancery (Case No. 2021-1097-MTZ). In the litigation, we contended that the Defendants repeatedly failed to honor their legal obligations to NHI. In particular, we asserted that the Defendants acquired assets from a third party, Holiday, that included leases to NHI senior living facilities and fraudulently induced NHI to consent to the assignment of the leases, and then immediately failed to pay rent or provide a promised security agreement that was intended to secure against their default, all as part of an effort to pressure NHI to agree to new conditions outside the assignment agreement or force a sale of the properties to the Defendants. The lawsuit further asserted that the Defendants owed unpaid contractual rent.
In connection with a memorandum of understanding between the parties dated March 4, 2022, NHI applied the remaining approximately $8.8 million lease deposit to past due rents in the first quarter of 2022. Also, as provided by the memorandum of understanding, Welltower transferred approximately $6.9 million to an escrow account to be released upon satisfactory transition of the facility operations and mutual dismissal of the lawsuit. NHI and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a settlement agreement dated March 31, 2022 with Defendants formalizing the terms to settle the lawsuit.
NHI and certain of its subsidiaries terminated the master lease with Well Churchill Leasehold Owner, LLC as successor in interest to NHI Master Tenant LLC, effective April 1, 2022, upon completion of the transition of the properties subject to the master lease, as follows: (i) one property was sold to a third party, (ii) one property was transitioned to an existing operator relationship and leased pursuant to an existing master lease, and (iii) the remaining 15 properties were transitioned into two new SHOP partnership ventures. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for more information on these new ventures.
Also effective April 1, 2022, the parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit and mutually release all claims related to or arising out of the litigation and the $6.9 million in escrowed funds were released to NHI and recognized as rental income for the year ended December 31, 2022. We recognized a loss of approximately $0.7 million, reflected in “Loss on operations transfer, net” on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022. This net loss represents the amount of net working capital deficit assumed by NHI in connection with the transfer of operations following the termination of the master lease. The net working capital assumed by NHI on April 1, 2022 was comprised primarily of facility furniture, fixtures and equipment, net resident accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable
37
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
The Company’s charter contains certain provisions which are designed to ensure that the Company’s status as a REIT is protected for federal income tax purposes. One of the provisions ensures that any transfer (of shares) which would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely-held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void which, subject to certain exceptions, result in no stockholder being allowed to own, either directly or indirectly pursuant to certain tax attribution rules, more than 9.9% of the Company’s common stock with the exception of prior agreements in 1991 which were confirmed in writing in 2008 with the Company’s founders Dr. Carl E. Adams and Jennie Mae Adams and their lineal descendants. Based on these agreements, the ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. If a stockholder’s stock ownership exceeds the limit, then such shares over the limit become Excess Stock within the meaning in the Company’s charter and lose rights to vote and receive dividends in certain situations. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. In addition, W. Andrew Adams’ Excess Holder Agreement also provides that he will not own shares of stock in any tenant of the Company if such ownership would cause the Company to constructively own more than a 9.9% interest in such tenant. The purpose of these provisions is to protect the Company’s status as a REIT for tax purposes.
In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to a REIT, we must make distributions to holders of our common stock equal on an annual basis to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains), as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Cash available for distribution to our stockholders is primarily derived from rental payments received under our leases and from interest payments received on our notes. All distributions will be made by us at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our cash flow and earnings, our financial condition, covenants contained in our financing documents and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Our REIT taxable income is calculated without reference to our cash flow. Therefore, under certain circumstances, our required distributions may exceed the cash available for distribution.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NHI.” As of February 13, 2023, there were approximately 689 holders of record of shares and 56,540 beneficial owners of shares.
The following graph demonstrates the performance of the cumulative total return to the stockholders of our common stock during the previous five years in comparison to the cumulative total return on the MSCI US REIT Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index. The MSCI US REIT Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is comprised of equity REIT securities. The MSCI US REIT Index includes securities with exposure to core real estate (e.g. residential and retail properties) as well as securities with exposure to other types of real estate (e.g. casinos, theaters).
38
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| NHI | $100.00 | $105.71 | $120.04 | $109.20 | $96.51 | $94.79 | ||||||||||||||
| MSCI | $100.00 | $95.43 | $120.09 | $110.99 | $158.79 | $119.87 | ||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 | $100.00 | $95.62 | $125.72 | $148.85 | $191.58 | $156.88 | ||||||||||||||
The graph above is not deemed to be “soliciting material” and is “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or incorporated by reference in any filing under Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
39
ITEM 6. RESERVED.
40
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of National Health Investors, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other important factors are identified in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above. This section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 2022 and 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021. Discussions of 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020 that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Executive Overview
National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust specializing in sale-leaseback, joint-venture, and mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical facility investments. We operate through two reportable segments: Real Estate Investments and SHOP. Our Real Estate Investments segment consists of real estate investments and mortgage and other notes receivables in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities and a hospital. We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities. Our SHOP segment is comprised of the operations of 15 independent living facilities that provide residential living and other services for residents located throughout the United States that are operated on behalf of the Company by two independent managers pursuant to the terms of separate management agreements. The third-party managers, or related parties of the managers, own equity interests in the respective ventures.
Real Estate Investments
As of December 31, 2022, we had investments in real estate and mortgage and other notes receivable involving 177 facilities located in 32 states. These investments involve 103 senior housing properties, 73 skilled nursing facilities and one hospital, excluding 13 properties classified as assets held for sale. These investments consisted of properties with an original cost of approximately $2.4 billion, rented under primarily triple-net leases to 24 tenants, and $248.5 million aggregate carrying value of mortgage and other notes receivable, excluding an allowance for expected credit losses of $15.3 million, due from 14 borrowers.
We classify all of the properties in our Real Estate Investments portfolio as either senior housing or medical facilities. Because our leases represent different underlying revenue sources and result in differing risk profiles, we further classify our senior housing properties as either need-driven (assisted living facilities and senior living campuses) or discretionary (independent living and entrance-fee communities).
Senior Housing – Need-Driven includes assisted living facilities and senior living campuses which primarily attract private payment for services from residents who require assistance with activities of daily living. Need-driven properties are subject to regulatory oversight.
Senior Housing – Discretionary includes independent living facilities and entrance-fee communities which primarily attract private payment for services from residents who are making the lifestyle choice of living in an age-restricted multi-family community that offers social programs, meals, housekeeping and in some cases access to healthcare services. Discretionary properties are subject to limited regulatory oversight. There is a correlation between demand for this type of community and the strength of the housing market.
Medical Facilities within our portfolio receive payment primarily from Medicare, Medicaid and health insurance. These properties include skilled nursing facilities and a hospital that attract patients who have a need for acute or complex medical attention, preventative medicine, or rehabilitation services. Medical properties are subject to state and federal regulatory oversight and, in the case of hospitals, Joint Commission accreditation.
Senior Housing Operating Portfolio
Effective April 1, 2022, 15 senior housing ILFs previously part of the legacy Holiday Retirement properties were transferred from a triple-net lease to two separate ventures comprising our SHOP, which represents a new reportable segment. These ventures, in which NHI owns a majority interest, own the underlying independent living operations and are structured to
41
comply with REIT requirements that utilize the TRS for activities that would otherwise be non-qualifying for REIT purposes. These properties are operated by two third-party property managers that manage our communities in exchange for the receipt of a management fee, and as such, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of the managers in the same manner or to the same extent as we are to our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on the managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our communities efficiently and effectively. We also rely on the managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. As of December 31, 2022, our SHOP consisted of 15 ILFs with a combined 1,732 units located in eight states.
42
The following tables summarize our portfolio, excluding $2.6 million for our corporate office, assets held for sale and a credit loss reserve of $15.3 million, as of December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| Portfolio Summary | Properties | NOI | % Portfolio | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real Estate Properties | 160 | $ | 207,912 | 86.6 | % | $ | 2,389,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable | 17 | 24,383 | 10.2 | % | 248,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SHOP | 15 | 7,603 | 3.2 | % | 338,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Portfolio | 192 | $ | 239,898 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,975,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio by Operator Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Public | 55 | $ | 60,799 | 25.3 | % | $ | 411,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| National Chain (Privately Owned) | 1 | 26,188 | 10.9 | % | 134,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regional | 108 | 121,100 | 50.5 | % | 1,935,773 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Small | 13 | 8,387 | 3.5 | % | 155,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Year Disposals and Held for Sale | 9,240 | 3.9 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Year Note Payoffs | 6,581 | 2.7 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Real Estate Investments Portfolio | 177 | 232,295 | 96.8 | % | 2,637,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SHOP | 15 | 7,603 | 3.2 | % | 338,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Portfolio | 192 | $ | 239,898 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,975,826 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2022, operators of facilities in our Real Estate Investments portfolio who provided 3% or more and collectively 59% of our total revenues were (parent company, in alphabetical order): Discovery Senior Living; Encore
43
Senior Living, Health Services Management; Holiday Retirement; Life Care Services; National HealthCare Corporation; Senior Living Communities; and The Ensign Group.
As of December 31, 2022, our average effective annualized Net Operating Income (“NOI”) for the lease properties in our Real Estate Investments reportable segment was $9,500 per bed for SNFs, $11,543 per unit for SLCs, $13,448 per unit for ALFs, $9,208 per unit for ILFs, $21,240 per unit for EFCs, and $57,599 per bed for the hospital, excluding the non-cash write-off of Bickford and two other tenants’ straight-line rents receivable and lease incentives discussed below under “Tenant Concentration”. As of December 31, 2022, our average effective annualized NOI for the SHOP reportable segment was $17,558 per unit.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the operations of many of our tenants, managers and borrowers. The revenues from our SHOP ventures, borrowers and operators of our leased properties are dependent on occupancy. Future occupancy rates may be adversely affected by the possibility of new COVID variants, increased resident move-outs, re-implementation of restrictions on new resident move-ins, and the possibility of potential residents foregoing or delaying a move. Operating expenses of our SHOP ventures and those of our borrowers and the tenants of our leased properties may also be negatively impacted as a result of the additional enhanced health and safety precautions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. A decrease in occupancy or increase in costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and on the ability of tenants of our leased properties and borrowers to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, including the payments of rent, interest and principal.
Throughout the pandemic to date, we have granted various rent concessions to tenants whose operations have been adversely affected by the pandemic. When applicable, we have accounted for rent concessions as variable lease payments, recorded as rental income when received, in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Lease Modification Q&A. Reference Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
As of December 31, 2022, aggregate pandemic-related rent concessions granted to tenants that have been accounted for as variable lease payments totaled approximately $44.3 million, of which $3.7 million were rent abatements. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we granted pandemic-related rent deferrals of $9.3 million to seven tenants, of which Bickford accounted for approximately $4.0 million. Repayments and other reductions of pandemic-related rent deferrals recognized in “Rental Income” during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $3.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Additionally, $4.1 million of pandemic-related rent deferrals were forgiven during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Rent deferrals accounted for as variable lease payments granted for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 totaled approximately $26.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, of which Bickford accounted for approximately $18.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
We base our estimates on historical experience, current trends and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We consider an accounting estimate or assumption critical if:
1.the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and
2.the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
44
If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in this report. We believe the accounting estimates listed below are the most critical to fully understanding and evaluating our financial results, and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries and subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest. We also consolidate certain entities when control of such entities can be achieved through means other than voting rights if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of such entities. We make judgments about which entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) based on an assessment of whether (i) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support, (ii) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have a controlling financial interest, or (iii) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. Additionally, we make judgments with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. These considerations include, but are not limited to, our power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity, and our ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions, replace the manager and/or liquidate the entity. Our ability to correctly determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE at inception of our involvement impacts the presentation of these entities in our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Properties
Real property we develop is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of interest during construction. The cost of real property investments we acquire is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. For properties acquired in transactions accounted for as asset purchases, the purchase price, which includes transaction costs, is allocated based on the relative fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired. Cost includes the amount of contingent consideration, if any, deemed to be probable at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is deemed to be probable to the extent that a significant reversal in amounts recognized is not likely to occur when the uncertainty associated with the contingent consideration is subsequently resolved. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land, equipment, buildings and other improvements, and intangible assets and liabilities, if any. Our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use for real estate allocation.
Impairments of Real Estate Properties.
We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying values of our properties on a property-by-property basis. We review each property for recoverability when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes in the property, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions, reclassification of real estate property as held for sale, or significant deterioration of the underlying cash flows of the property, indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. The need to recognize an impairment charge is based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property compared to the carrying value of that property. Accordingly, management’s evaluation requires judgment to determine the existence of indicators of impairment and estimates of undiscounted cash flows. If recognition of an impairment charge is necessary, it is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property. Refer to Note 3. Investment Activity to our consolidated financial statements for more details.
There were no material changes in the accounting methodology we use to assess impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $51.6 million related to 19 properties all within the Real Estate Investments segment.
45
Lease Classification
Lease accounting standards require that, for purposes of lease classification, we assess whether the lease, by its terms, transfers substantially all of the fair value of the asset under lease. This consideration will drive accounting for the alternative classifications among either operating, sales-type, or direct financing types of leases. For classification purposes, we distinguish cash flows that follow under terms of the lease from those that will derive, subsequent to the lease, from the ultimate disposition or re-deployment of the asset. From this segregation of the sources of cash flow, we are able to establish whether the lease is, in essence, a sale or financing based in it having transferred substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset. Accordingly, management’s projected residual values represent significant assumptions in our accounting for leases.
While we do not incorporate residual value guarantees in our lease provisions, the contractual structure of other provisions provides a basis for expectations of realizable value from our properties, upon expiration of their lease terms. Additionally, we consider historical, demographic and market trends in developing our estimates. For each new lease, we discount our estimate of unguaranteed residual value and include this amount along with the stream of lease payments (also discounted) called for in the lease. We assess the stream of lease payments and the value deriving from eventual return of our property to establish whether the lease payments themselves comprise a return of substantially all of the fair value of the property under lease. We do not use a “bright line” in considering what constitutes “substantially all of the fair value,” but we undertake a more focused assessment when the lease payments approach 90% of the composition of all future cash flows expected from the asset.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to assess lease classifications.
Allowance for Credit Losses
For our mortgage and other notes receivable, we evaluate the estimated collectability of contractual loan payments amid general economic conditions on the basis of a like-kind pooling of our loans. We estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. In developing our expectation of losses, we will consider financial assets that share similar risk characteristics such as rate, age, type, location and adequacy of collateral on a collective basis. Other note investments which do not share common features will continue to be evaluated on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
The determination of fair value and whether a shortfall in operating revenues or the existence of operating losses is indicative of a loss in value involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends, the duration of the fair value deficiency, and any other relevant factors. When an economic downturn whose duration is expected to span a year or more is encountered, such as the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we consider projections about an expected economic recovery before we conclude that evidence of impairment exists. While we believe that the net carrying amounts of our notes receivable and other investments are realizable, it is possible that future events could require us to make significant adjustments or revisions to these estimates. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we designated a mortgage note receivable of $10.0 million and a mezzanine loan of $14.5 million with affiliates of one operator/borrower as non-performing. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized credit loss charges of $10.4 million of which $8.7 million related to these two loans upon their designation as non-performing.
While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results. Our model utilizes estimates of probability of default and loss given default. We review our assumptions and adjust these estimates accordingly on a quarterly basis. A 10% increase or decrease in either the probability of default or loss given default would result in an additional provision or recovery of $1.6 million.
2022 Activity
The following summarizes significant activity that occurred for the year ended December 31, 2022:
•During the first quarter, we applied the remaining approximately $8.8 million legacy Holiday lease deposit to past due rents that was reflected as rental income.
•On April 1, 2022, we received $6.9 million in previously escrowed funds upon settlement and dismissal of the Welltower litigation related to the master lease for the legacy Holiday portfolio that was reflected as rental income.
46
Concurrently with the settlement and dismissal, we transitioned 15 of the legacy Holiday ILFs into two separate ventures that own the underlying independent living operations, forming our new SHOP segment.
•We converted Bickford to the cash basis of accounting for their lease agreements and wrote off approximately $18.1 million of straight-line rents receivable and $7.1 million of lease incentives to rental income.
•We converted two other tenants to the cash basis of accounting for their lease agreements and wrote off approximately $7.9 million of straight-line rents receivable.
•During the fourth quarter of 2022, we designated a mortgage note receivable and a mezzanine loan totaling an aggregate $24.5 million with affiliates of one borrower as non-performing and recorded additional credit loss reserves of approximately $8.7 million for these loans. This operator/borrower is also one of the tenants converted to cash basis of accounting.
•We disposed of 22 facilities from our Real Estate Investments segment for net proceeds of $169.0 million.
•We received repayment in full of a $111.3 million mortgage note receivable.
•We repurchased through open market transactions 2.5 million shares of our common stock for an average price of $61.56 per share, excluding commissions.
•The SHOP segment NOI was $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Since January 1, 2022, we have completed or committed to the following real estate and note investments ($ in thousands):
| Date | Properties | Asset Class | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real Estate Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living | Q2 2022 | 1 | ALF | $ | 13,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bickford Senior Living | Q4 2022 | 1 | ALF | 17,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Note Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living | Q1 2022 | 1 | ALF | 28,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital Funding Group | Q4 2022 | 5 | SNF | 42,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 101,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encore Senior Living
In January 2022, we entered into an agreement to fund a $28.5 million development loan with Encore Senior Living to construct a 108-unit assisted living and memory care community in Fitchburg, Wisconsin. The four-year loan agreement has an annual interest rate of 8.5% and two one-year extensions. We have a purchase option on the property once it has stabilized. The total amount funded on the note was $14.2 million as of December 31, 2022
In the second quarter of 2022, we acquired a 53-unit ALF located in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, from Encore Senior Living. The acquisition price was $13.3 million and included the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable to us of $9.1 million, including interest. We have agreed to pay up to $0.8 million in additional cash consideration pending the results of an ongoing property tax appeal. As of December 31, 2022, no amount of this consideration is expected to be paid. We added the facility to an existing master lease for a term of 15 years at an initial lease rate of 7.25%, with an annual escalator of 2.5%.
Bickford
In November 2022, we acquired a 60-unit ALF located in Virginia Beach, Virginia, from Bickford. The acquisition price was $17.2 million, including $0.2 million in closing costs, and the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14.0 million including interest. The acquisition price also included a reduction of $3.0 million in Bickford’s outstanding pandemic-related rent deferrals that were recognized in rental income in the fourth quarter of 2022 based on the fair value of the real estate assets received. We added the facility to an existing master lease with Bickford for a term of 10.5 years at an initial rate of 8.0%, with annual CPI escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.
47
Capital Funding Group
In November 2022, we funded a $42.5 million senior loan to refinance a portfolio of five skilled nursing facilities located in Texas. The loan was made to affiliates of Capital Funding Group and the properties are leased by subsidiaries of The Ensign Group. The five-year loan agreement has an annual interest rate of 7.25% and two one-year extensions.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we completed the following real estate property dispositions within our Real Estate Investments reportable segment as described below ($ in thousands):
| Operator | Date | Properties | Asset Class | Net Proceeds | Net Real Estate Investment | Gain | Impairment1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hospital Corporation of America | Q1 2022 | 1 | MOB | $ | 4,868 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 2,964 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vitality Senior Living2 | Q1 2022 | 1 | SLC | 8,302 | 8,285 | 17 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holiday2 | Q2 2022 | 1 | ILF | 2,990 | 3,020 | — | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chancellor Senior Living2 | Q2 2022 | 2 | ALF | 7,305 | 7,357 | — | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bickford2 | Q2 2022 | 3 | ALF | 25,959 | 28,268 | — | 2,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comfort Care | Q2 2022 | 4 | ALF | 40,000 | 38,444 | 1,556 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Helix Healthcare | Q2 2022 | 1 | HOSP | 19,500 | 10,535 | 8,965 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discovery Senior Living2 | Q3 2022 | 2 | ALF/SLC | 16,379 | 15,159 | 1,220 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National HealthCare Corporation (“NHC”)3 | Q3 2022 | 7 | SNF | 43,686 | 30,066 | 13,620 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | $ | 168,989 | $ | 143,038 | $ | 28,342 | $ | 2,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Impairments are included in “Loan and realty losses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
2 Total impairment charges recognized on these properties were $28.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
3 See “Tenant Concentration” below for additional information on the NHC disposition.
Total rental income related to the disposed properties was $7.0 million, $10.9 million and $16.6 million for years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Reference Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for more detail on the 2022 property dispositions within our Real Estate Investments reportable segment.
Life Care Services - Sagewood
In the second quarter of 2022, we received from Life Care Services - Sagewood the repayment of its remaining principal of $111.3 million mortgage note receivable along with all accrued interest and a prepayment fee of approximately $1.1 million which is reflected in “Gain on note receivable payoff” in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022. Interest income was $5.2 million, $10.2 million and $11.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
2023 Investment Activity
In February 2023, we acquired two memory care communities operated by Silverado Senior Living for approximately $37.5 million. The newly developed properties that opened in 2022 and include a 60-unit community in Summerlin, Nevada and a 60-unit community in Frederick, Maryland and are leased pursuant to a 20-year lease master lease with a first-year lease rate of 7.5% and annual escalators of 2.0%.
In February 2023, we acquired a 60-unit assisted living and memory care community in Chesapeake, Virginia from Bickford. The acquisition price was $17.3 million, including approximately $0.1 million in closing costs, the satisfaction of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14.2 million including interest, and cash consideration of $0.5 million. The acquisition price also included a reduction of $2.5 million in Bickford’s outstanding pandemic-related deferrals. We added the community to an existing master lease with Bickford was added to an existing master lease with Bickford at an initial rate of 8.0%, with annual CPI escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.
Assets Held for Sale and Long-Lived Assets
At December 31, 2022, 13 properties in our Real Estate Investments reportable segment, with an aggregate net real estate balance of $43.3 million, were classified as assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Rental income associated
48
with the 13 properties was $2.1 million, $5.6 million, and $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded impairments of approximately $51.6 million on 19 properties which were sold or classified as held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded impairments of approximately $51.8 million on ten properties which were sold or classified as held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment. Impairment charges are included in “Loan and realty losses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Tenant Purchase Options
Certain of our leases contain purchase options allowing tenants to acquire the leased properties. For options exercisable or exercisable in the near future, we are engaged in preliminary negotiations to continue as lessor or in some other capacity.
A summary of these tenant options is presented below ($ in thousands):
| Asset | Number of | Lease | 1st Option | Option | Contractual | ||||||||||||
| Type | Properties | Expiration | Open Year | Basis1 | Rent | ||||||||||||
| SHO | 2 | May 2035 | 2027 | i | $ | 5,868 | |||||||||||
| SNF | 1 | September 2028 | 2028 | ii | $ | 501 | |||||||||||
1 Tenant purchase options generally give the lessee an option to purchase the underlying property for consideration determined by (i) a fixed base price plus a specified share in any appreciation; or (ii) fixed base price.
We cannot reasonably estimate at this time the probability that any other purchase options will be exercised in the future. Consideration to be received from the exercise of any tenant purchase option is expected to exceed our net investment in the leased property or properties.
Other
Our leases for real estate are typically structured as “triple-net leases” on single-tenant properties having an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years with one or more five-year renewal options. As such, there may be reporting periods in which we experience few, if any, lease renewals or expirations. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we did not have any significant renewing or expiring leases. Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. For financial statement purposes, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Tenant Concentration
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, we have two tenants (including their affiliated entities, which are the legal tenants) from whom we individually derive at least 10% of our total revenues. NHC is a publicly traded company and we do not report specific occupancy information from them.
Occupancy
The following table summarizes the average portfolio occupancy for Senior Living Communities, Bickford and SHOP for the periods indicated, excluding development properties in operation less than 24 months, notes receivable, and properties transitioned to new tenants or disposed.
| Properties | 4Q21 | 1Q22 | 2Q22 | 3Q22 | 4Q22 | December 2022 | January 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | 9 | 81.7% | 81.7% | 82.3% | 83.3% | 83.5% | 83.9% | 84.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
Bickford1 | 39 | 83.9% | 82.8% | 83.1% | 84.7% | 83.5% | 82.9% | 81.7% | ||||||||||||||||||
SHOP2 | 15 | 80.6% | 77.7% | 76.5% | 76.9% | 75.8% | 75.5% | 75.4% | ||||||||||||||||||
1Prior periods restated to reflect the purchase option exercised in November 2022 on an ALF in Virginia.
2Prior periods restated for a first quarter 2022 single asset disposition.
49
Tenant Monitoring
Our operators report to us the results of their operations on a periodic basis, which we in turn subject to further analysis as a means of monitoring potential concerns within our portfolio. We have identified EBITDARM (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees) as a primary performance measure for our tenants, based on results they have reported to us. We believe EBITDARM is useful in our most fundamental analyses, as it is a property-level measure of our operators’ success, by eliminating the effects of the operator’s method of acquiring the use of its assets (interest and rent), its non-cash expenses (depreciation and amortization), expenses that are dependent on its level of success (income taxes), and also excluding the effect of the operator’s payment of its management fees, as typically those fees are contractually subordinate to our lease payment. For operators of our entrance-fee communities, our calculation of EBITDARM includes other cash flow adjustments typical of the industry which may include, but are not limited to, net cash flows from entrance fees; amortization of deferred entrance fees; adjustments for tenant rent obligations, and management fee true-ups. The eliminations and adjustments reflect covenants in our leases and provide a comparable basis for assessing our various relationships.
We believe that EBITDARM is a useful way to analyze the cash potential of a group of assets. From EBITDARM we calculate a coverage ratio (EBITDARM/cash rent), measuring the ability of the operator to meet its monthly obligation. In addition to EBITDARM and the coverage ratio, we rely on a careful balance sheet analysis, and other analytical procedures to help us identify potential areas of concern relative to our operators’ ability to generate sufficient liquidity to meet their obligations, including their obligation to continue to pay the amount due to us. Typical among our operators is a varying lag in reporting to us the results of their operations. Across our portfolio, however, our operators report their results, typically within either 30 or 45 days and at the latest, within 90 days of month’s end. For computational purposes, we exclude mortgages and other notes receivable, development and lease-up properties that have been in operation less than 24 months. For stabilized acquisitions in the portfolio less than 24 months and renewing leases with changes in scheduled rent, we include pro forma cash rent. Same-store portfolio coverage excludes properties that have transitioned operators in the past 24 months or assets subsequently sold except as noted.
The results of our coverage ratio analysis are presented below on a trailing twelve-month basis, as of September 30, 2022 and 2021 (the most recent periods available).
50
1 NHC based on corporate-level Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and includes three ILFs and excludes seven sold SNF assets (four in MA and three in NH) during 2022.
2 Excluding PPP funds received from the third quarter 2021, SLC and Bickford coverage was 1.00x and 0.84x, respectively. SLC operates nine discretionary CCRC properties and one need driven assisted living community. Bickford proforma coverage at the restructured lease amount would be 1.31x for third quarter 2022.
3 Excludes properties that have transitioned operators in past 24 months and includes properties classified as held for sale.
These results include any amounts received and recognized by the operators from the HHS CARES Act Provider Relief Fund and funds received under the Paycheck Protection Program if the loan has been forgiven. Our operators may not consistently account for any COVID-19 pandemic relief funds received which can impact comparability among operators and across periods.
Fluctuations in portfolio coverage are a result of market and economic trends, local market competition, and regulatory factors as well as the operational success of our tenants. We use the results of individual leases to inform our decision making with respect to specific tenants, but trends described above by property type and operator bear analysis. Our senior housing
51
portfolio shows a decline brought about primarily by a softening in occupancy and rising expenses, including wage pressures. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. has further softened coverage for these operators as well as across our portfolio. For many of the affected operators, as is typical of our portfolio in general, NHI has security deposits in place and/or corporate guarantees should actual cash rental shortfalls eventually materialize. In certain instances, our operators may increase their security deposits with us in an amount equal to the coverage shortfall, and, upon subsequent compliance with the required lease coverage ratio, the operator would then be entitled to a full refund. The sufficiency of credit enhancements (e.g. tenant deposits and guarantees) as a protection against economic downturn will be a focus as we monitor economic and financial conditions, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The metrics presented in the tables above give no effect to the presence of these security deposits. Because of the recent disposals of the Florida medical office building and a behavioral hospital, we combined the medical office building (“MOB”) and Hospital categories previously presented into the “Medical Non-SNF” category.
Other Portfolio Activity
Real Estate and Mortgage Write-downs
In addition to inflation risk, increased interest rates and new COVID-19 pandemic variants, our borrowers and tenants experience periods of significant financial pressures and difficulties similar to those encountered by other health care providers.
Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, which broadened the information we must consider in developing our expected credit loss estimates to include forecasted economic information in addition to our historical experience. We have established a reserve for estimated credit losses of $15.3 million and a liability of $0.7 million for estimated credit losses on unfunded loan commitments as of December 31, 2022. Provision for expected credit losses, reflected in “Loan and realty losses” on the Consolidated Statements of Income, totaled $10.4 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We evaluate the reserves for estimated credit losses on a quarterly basis and make adjustments based on current circumstances as considered necessary.
Our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 reflect impairment charges of our long-lived assets of approximately $51.6 million as a result of economic and financial factors, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We reduced the carrying value of any impaired properties to estimated fair values, or with respect to the properties classified as held for sale, to estimated fair value less costs to sell. We have no significant intangible assets currently recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022, that would require assessment for impairment.
We believe that the carrying amounts of our real estate properties are recoverable and that mortgage and other notes receivable, net of reserves, are realizable and supported by the value of the underlying collateral. However, it is possible that future events could require us to make additional significant adjustments to these carrying amounts. Refer to Note 3. Investment Activity in the consolidated financial statements for more information.
52
Results of Operations
The significant items affecting revenues and expenses are described below ($ in thousands):
| Years Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | Period Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rental income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOSP leased to Vizion Health | $ | 3,471 | $ | 2,034 | $ | 1,437 | 70.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| EFCs leased to Senior Living Communities | 47,098 | 45,037 | 2,061 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALFs leased to Chancellor Senior Living | 2,845 | 8,500 | (5,655) | (66.5) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| SHOs leased to Discovery Senior Living | 6,683 | 8,652 | (1,969) | (22.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| SHOs leased to The Ensign Group | 25,902 | 24,427 | 1,475 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| SHOs leased to Holiday Retirement | — | 13,024 | (13,024) | (100.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALFs leased to Bickford Senior Living | 18,710 | 24,652 | (5,942) | (24.1) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other new and existing leases | 91,234 | 91,524 | (290) | (0.3) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Current year disposals and assets held for sale | 28,650 | 26,958 | 1,692 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| 224,593 | 244,808 | (20,215) | (8.3) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Straight-line rent adjustments, new and existing leases | (16,681) | 14,603 | (31,284) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Escrow funds received from tenants for property operating expenses | 9,788 | 11,638 | (1,850) | (15.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Rental Income | 217,700 | 271,049 | (53,349) | (19.7) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Resident fees and services | 35,796 | — | 35,796 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income from mortgage and other notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vizion Health | 1,702 | 1,027 | 675 | 65.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living construction loans | 2,579 | 1,835 | 744 | 40.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Montecito Medical Real Estate | 1,792 | 161 | 1,631 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loan payoffs | 6,581 | 10,164 | (3,583) | (35.3) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other existing mortgages and notes | 11,729 | 11,347 | 382 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Interest Income from Mortgage and Other Notes | 24,383 | 24,534 | (151) | (0.6) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 315 | 3,132 | (2,817) | (89.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | 278,194 | 298,715 | (20,521) | (6.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SHOs leased to Holiday Retirement | — | 9,296 | (9,296) | (100.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALFs leased to Bickford Senior Living | 10,307 | 11,611 | (1,304) | (11.2) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALFs leased to Chancellor Senior Living | 2,157 | 3,529 | (1,372) | (38.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| SHOP depreciation | 6,408 | — | 6,408 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Current year disposals and assets held for sale | 4,984 | 9,845 | (4,861) | (49.4) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other new and existing assets | 47,024 | 46,517 | 507 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Depreciation | 70,880 | 80,798 | (9,918) | (12.3) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | 44,917 | 50,810 | (5,893) | (11.6) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Senior housing operating expenses | 28,193 | — | 28,193 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 22,768 | 18,431 | 4,337 | 23.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes and insurance on leased properties | 9,788 | 11,638 | (1,850) | (15.9) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loan and realty losses | 61,911 | 52,766 | 9,145 | 17.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 3,399 | 1,696 | 1,703 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| 241,856 | 216,139 | 25,717 | 11.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | (710) | — | (710) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | 1,113 | — | 1,113 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | (151) | (1,912) | 1,761 | (92.1) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
53
| Gains (losses) from equity method investment | 569 | (1,545) | 2,114 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | 28,342 | 32,498 | (4,156) | (12.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | — | 350 | (350) | (100.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 65,501 | 111,967 | (46,466) | (41.5) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Less: net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 902 | (163) | 1,065 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 66,403 | $ | 111,804 | $ | (45,401) | (40.6) | % | |||||||||||||||
| NM - not meaningful | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021 were as follows:
•Rental income recognized from our tenants decreased $53.3 million, or 19.7%, as a result of the Holiday portfolio transition of approximately $13.0 million, dispositions of 22 properties for approximately $7.0 million, net of new investments funded since December 2021. Included in rental income for the year ended December 31, 2022, is approximately $26.0 million in write-offs of straight-line rents receivable for three tenants placed on cash basis of rental income recognition, and $7.1 million in write-offs of lease incentives related to Bickford.
•Resident fees and services and senior housing operating expenses include revenues and expenses from our SHOP activities which commenced on April 1, 2022. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
•Funds received for reimbursement of property operating expenses totaled $9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, and are reflected as a component of rental income. These property operating expenses are recognized in operating expenses in the line item “Taxes and insurance on leased properties.” The decrease in the reimbursement income and corresponding property expenses is the result of property dispositions in the current year.
•Interest income from mortgage and other notes decreased $0.2 million, or 0.6%, primarily due to new and existing loan fundings, net of paydowns on loans.
•Other income decreased $2.8 million primarily due to the recognition of a lease termination fee upon disposition of a property during 2021.
•Depreciation expense decreased $9.9 million, or 12.3%, primarily as a result of dispositions of approximately $143.0 million since December 2021.
•Interest expense decreased $5.9 million, or 11.6%, as a result of debt maturities and repayments on borrowings.
•General and administrative expenses increased $4.3 million, or 23.5%. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and benefit expenses of approximately $2.1 million as a result of additional personnel and $1.3 million in professional fees.
•Loan and realty losses increased $9.1 million, or 17.3%, primarily as a result of an increase in the credit loss reserve in 2022 for two loans designated as non-performing. In 2022, we incurred impairment charges of approximately $51.6 million on 19 properties which were sold or classified as assets held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred impairment charges of approximately $51.8 million on ten properties which were sold or classified as held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment.
•Loss on early retirement of debt decreased by $1.8 million. The losses of $1.9 million recognized in 2021 related to the early repayments of a term loan and two Fannie Mae loans.
•Gain on note receivable payoff of $1.1 million reflects the prepayment fee received from the early repayment of a $111.3 million mortgage note receivable in the second quarter of 2022. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
54
•Gains (losses) from equity method investment for the year ended December 31, 2022 represent cash distributions received and for the year ended December 31, 2021 represent our proportionate share of losses related to our Timber Ridge OpCo investment. Reference Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
•Gains on sales of real estate decreased $4.2 million, or 12.8%. For the year ended December 31,2022, we recorded $28.3 million in gains from dispositions of 22 real estate assets. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded $32.5 million in gains from dispositions of 22 real estate assets. Reference “Asset Dispositions” in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
55
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2022, we had $658.0 million available to draw on our revolving credit facility, $19.3 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and the potential to access the remaining $415.7 million through the issuance of common stock under the Company’s $500.0 million at-the-market (“ATM”) program. In addition, the Company maintains an effective automatic shelf registration statement through which capital could be raised via the issuance of debt and or equity securities.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our primary sources of cash include rent payments, receipts from residents, principal and interest payments on mortgage and other notes receivable, proceeds from the sales of real property, net proceeds from offerings of equity securities and borrowings from our loans and revolving credit facility. Our primary uses of cash include debt service payments (both principal and interest), new investments in real estate and notes receivable, dividend distributions to our stockholders, operating expenses for SHOP and general corporate overhead.
These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as summarized below ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended | One Year Change | Year Ended | One Year Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2022 | 12/31/2021 | $ | % | 12/31/2020 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, January 1 | $ | 39,485 | $ | 46,343 | $ | (6,858) | (14.8) | % | $ | 15,669 | $ | 30,674 | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 185,340 | 210,859 | (25,519) | (12.1) | % | 232,148 | (21,289) | (9.2)% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 197,945 | 185,277 | 12,668 | 6.8 | % | (89,712) | 274,989 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (401,254) | (402,994) | 1,740 | (0.4) | % | (111,762) | (291,232) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, December 31 | $ | 21,516 | $ | 39,485 | $ | (17,969) | (45.5) | % | $ | 46,343 | $ | (6,858) | (14.8)% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities – Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $25.5 million from the year ended December 31, 2021. Cash provided by operating activities was negatively impacted by the disposition of 44 properties since January 1, 2021 and benefited from the reduction in pandemic related rent concessions granted of approximately $17.1 million. In addition, cash provided by operations included the effects of new investments, the creation of the SHOP ventures in 2022, collections from escalators on existing leasing arrangements and interest payments on new real estate and note investments completed during 2022 and 2021.
Investing Activities – Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 was comprised primarily of the proceeds from the sales of real estate of approximately $169.0 million and the collection of principal on mortgage and other notes receivable of $119.2 million, offset by $90.8 million of investments in mortgage and other notes and renovations and acquisitions of real estate.
Financing Activities – Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 differs from the same period in 2021 primarily as a result of an approximately $167.2 million decrease in net borrowings, inclusive of the $400.0 million senior note offering in 2021 discussed below, an approximately $47.9 million decrease in proceeds from issuance of common stock, an approximately $21.1 million decrease in dividend payments, and approximately $152.0 million used to repurchase common stock in 2022.
Debt Obligations
As of December 31, 2022, we had outstanding debt of $1.1 billion. Reference Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about our outstanding indebtedness. Also, reference “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for more details on our indebtedness and the impact of interest rate risk.
Unsecured Bank Credit Facility - On March 31, 2022, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “2022 Credit Agreement”) providing us with a $700.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, replacing our previous $550.0 million unsecured revolver. The 2022 Credit Agreement matures in March 2026, but may be extended at our option, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional six-month periods. Borrowings under the 2022 Credit Agreement bear interest, at our election, at either (i) Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) (plus a credit spread adjustment) plus a margin ranging from 0.725% to 1.40%, (ii) Daily SOFR (plus a credit spread adjustment) plus a margin ranging from 0.725% to 1.40% or (iii) the “base rate” plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.40%. In each election, the actual margin is determined according to our credit ratings. The base rate means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the
56
Agent’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate on such day plus 0.50% or (iii) the adjusted Term SOFR for a one-month tenor in effect on such day plus 1.0%. We incurred $4.5 million of deferred financing costs in connection with the 2022 Credit Agreement.
Concurrently with the execution of the 2022 Credit Agreement, we amended our $300.0 million term loan, maturing in September 2023 (“2023 Term Loan”). The amendment modifies the existing covenants to align with provisions in the 2022 Credit Agreement and to accrue interest on borrowings based on SOFR (plus a credit spread adjustment) that were previously based on LIBOR, with no change to the existing applicable interest rate margins. We may also elect for the 2023 Term Loan to accrue interest at a base rate plus the applicable margin. As of December 31, 2022, we had repaid $60.0 million of the 2023 Term Loan.
In March 2022, we repaid a $75.0 million term loan with a maturity in August 2022 with proceeds from the revolving credit facility. The term loan bore interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 135 basis points (“bps”), based on our current ratings. Upon repayment, we expensed approximately $0.2 million of unamortized loan costs associated with this loan which is included in “Loss on early retirement of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, the revolver and term loan bore interest at a rate of one-month Term SOFR (plus a 10 bps spread adjustment) plus 105 bps and 125 bps, based on our debt ratings, or 5.51% and 5.71%, respectively. The facility fee for the revolver was 25 bps per annum.
In January 2023, we repaid a $125.0 million of private placement notes that were issued in January 2015 primarily with proceeds from the revolving credit facility. At January 31, 2023, $202.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
The current SOFR spreads and facility fee for our revolving credit facility and 2023 Term Loan reflect our ratings compliance based on the applicable margin for SOFR loans at a debt rating of BBB-/Baa3 in the Interest Rate Schedule provided below in summary format:
Interest Rate Schedule
| SOFR Spread | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt Ratings | Revolving Credit Facility | Revolving Credit Facility Fee | 2023 Term Loan | |||||||||||||||||
| A+/A1 | 0.725% | 0.125% | 0.75% | |||||||||||||||||
| A/A2 | 0.725% | 0.125% | 0.80% | |||||||||||||||||
| A-/A3 | 0.725% | 0.125% | 0.85% | |||||||||||||||||
| BBB+/Baa1 | 0.775% | 0.150% | 0.90% | |||||||||||||||||
| BBB/Baa2 | 0.850% | 0.200% | 1.00% | |||||||||||||||||
| BBB-/Baa3 | 1.050% | 0.250% | 1.25% | |||||||||||||||||
| Lower than BBB-/Baa3 | 1.400% | 0.300% | 1.65% | |||||||||||||||||
Beyond the applicable ratios detailed above, if our credit rating from at least two credit rating agencies is downgraded below “BBB-/Baa3” the debt under our credit agreements will be subject to defined increases in interest rates and fees.
The 2022 Credit Agreement requires that we calculate specified financial statement metrics and meet or exceed a variety of financial ratios, which are usual and customary in nature. These ratios are calculated quarterly and as of December 31, 2022, were within required limits for each reporting period in 2022 and 2021. The calculation of our leverage ratio involves intermediate determinations of our “Consolidated Total Indebtedness” and of our “Total Asset Value,” as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement.
Senior Notes Offering - In January 2021, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes that mature on February 1, 2031 and pay interest semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (the “2031 Senior Notes”). The 2031 Senior Notes were sold at an issue price of 99.196% of face value before the underwriters’ discount. Our net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses, were approximately $392.3 million and were used to repay a $100.0 million term loan and reduce borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
We remain in compliance with all debt covenants under the unsecured bank credit facility, 2031 Senior Notes and other debt agreements.
57
When we take on new debt or when we modify or replace existing debt, we incur debt issuance costs. These costs are subject to amortization over the term of the new debt instrument and may result in the write-off of fees associated with debt which has been replaced or modified.
Debt Maturities - Reference Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on our debt maturities.
Credit Ratings - Moody's Investors Services (“Moody’s) announced on November 5, 2020 that it assigned an investment grade issuer credit rating and a senior unsecured debt rating of ‘Baa3’ with a “Negative” outlook to the Company. Moody’s released a credit opinion on October 13, 2022 which affirmed the rating and revised the outlook to “Stable” for the Company. Both Fitch and S&P Global announced in November 2019 a public issuer credit rating of BBB- with an outlook of “Stable”. Fitch reaffirmed its rating most recently on December 9, 2021, and S&P Global reaffirmed its rating on November 14, 2022. Our unsecured private placement note agreements include a rate increase provision that is effective if any rating agency lowers our credit rating below investment grade and our compliance leverage increases to 50% or more. Any reduction in outlook or downgrade in our credit ratings from the rating agencies could negatively impact our costs of borrowings.
Debt Metrics - We believe that our fixed charge coverage ratio, which is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions) to fixed charges (interest expense at contractual rates net of capitalized interest and principal payments on debt), and the ratio of consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA are meaningful measures of our ability to service our debt. We use these two measures as a useful basis to compare the strength of our balance sheet with those in our peer group. We also believe our balance sheet gives us a competitive advantage when accessing debt markets.
We calculate our fixed charge coverage ratio as approximately 5.9x for the year ended December 31, 2022 (see our discussion under the heading Adjusted EBITDA including a reconciliation to our net income). Giving effect to significant acquisitions, financings, disposals and payoffs on an annualized basis, our consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio is approximately 4.7x for the year ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| Consolidated Total Debt | $ | 1,147,511 | |||
| Less: cash and cash equivalents | (19,291) | ||||
| Consolidated Net Debt | $ | 1,128,220 | |||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 251,788 | |||
| Annualized impact of recent investments, disposals and payoffs | (9,496) | ||||
| $ | 242,292 | ||||
| Consolidated Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA | 4.7x | ||||
Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information
The Company’s $940.0 million bank credit facility, unsecured private placement notes due January 2023 through January 2027 with an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million and 2031 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s subsidiaries, except for certain excluded subsidiaries (“Guarantors”). The Guarantors are either owned, controlled or are affiliates of the Company.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Company and the Guarantors, on a combined basis after eliminating (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the guarantor entities and (ii) equity in earnings from, and any investments in, any subsidiary that is a non-guarantor ($ in thousands):
58
| As of | ||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||
Real estate properties, net | $ | 1,790,525 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 355,509 | |||||||
Note receivable due from non-guarantor subsidiary | 81,396 | |||||||
Totals assets | $ | 2,227,430 | ||||||
Debt | $ | 1,071,287 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 66,717 | |||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,138,004 | ||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest | $ | 9,825 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | $ | 1,067 | ||||||
| Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||
Revenues | $ | 242,738 | ||||||
| Interest revenue on note due from non-guarantor subsidiary | 4,657 | |||||||
Expenses | 222,272 | |||||||
| Gain from equity method investee | 569 | |||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate | 28,342 | |||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | (151) | |||||||
| Other income | — | |||||||
Net income | $ | 53,883 | ||||||
| Net income attributable to NHI and the subsidiary guarantors | $ | 55,189 | ||||||
Equity
At December 31, 2022, we had 43,388,742 shares of common stock outstanding with a market value of $2.3 billion. Equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheet totaled $1.3 billion.
Dividends - Our Board of Directors approves a regular quarterly dividend which is reflective of expected taxable income on a recurring basis. Taxable income is determined in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and differs from net income for financial statements purposes determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our Board of Directors has historically directed the Company toward maintaining a strong balance sheet. Therefore, we consider the competing interests of short and long-term debt (interest rates, maturities and other terms) versus the higher cost of new equity, and we accept some level of risk associated with leveraging our investments. We intend to continue to make new investments that meet our underwriting criteria and where the spreads over our cost of equity and debt capital on a leverage neutral basis will generate sufficient returns to our stockholders. We do not expect to utilize borrowings to satisfy the payment of dividends and project that cash flows from operations will be adequate to fund dividends at the current rate.
We intend to comply with REIT dividend requirements that we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2022 and thereafter. Historically, the Company has distributed at least 100% of annual taxable income. Dividends declared for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year are paid by the end of the following January and are, with some exceptions, treated for tax purposes as having been paid in the fiscal year just ended as provided in IRS Code Sec. 857(b)(8).
Our dividends per share for the last three years are as follows:
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 3.60 | $ | 3.8025 | $ | 4.41 | |||||||||
Share Repurchase Plan - On April 15, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan for up to $240.0 million of the Company’s common stock (the “2022 Repurchase Plan”). During the year ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased through open market transactions 2,468,354 shares of common stock for an average price of $61.56 per share,
59
excluding commissions. All shares received were constructively retired upon receipt, and the excess of the purchase price over the par value per share was recorded to “Cumulative dividends in excess of net income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On February 17, 2023, our Board of Directors terminated the current stock repurchase program and authorized a revised repurchase program (the “Revised Repurchase Plan”) pursuant to which we may purchase up to $160.0 million in shares of our issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Revised Repurchase Plan is effective for a period of one year and does not require us to repurchase any specific number of shares. The Revised Repurchase Plan may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Shares may be repurchased from time-to-time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions or by other means in accordance with the terms of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and shall be made in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations in effect. The timing and number of shares repurchased, if any, will depend on a variety of factors, including price, general market and economic conditions, alternative investment opportunities and other corporate considerations.
Shelf Registration Statement - We have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission that allows the Company to offer and sell to the public an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and or units at prices and on terms to be announced when and if such securities are offered. The details of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds from any securities offered, will be described in a prospectus supplement or other offering materials, at the time of offering. Our shelf registration statement expires in March 2023. We expect to file a new shelf registration statement in the first quarter of 2023.
At-the-Market (ATM) Equity Program - We maintain an ATM program which allows us to sell our common stock directly into the market and have entered into an ATM equity offering sales agreement pursuant to which the Company may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate sales price of $500.0 million of the Company’s common shares. No shares were issued under the ATM program during 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued 661,951 common shares through the ATM program with an average price of $73.62, resulting in net proceeds after transaction costs of approximately $47.9 million.
Our use of ATM proceeds rebalanced our leverage in response to our acquisitions and keeps our options flexible for further expansion. We typically use proceeds from the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness, including borrowings under our credit facility. We view our ATM program as an effective way to match-fund our smaller acquisitions by exercising control over the timing and size of transactions and achieving a more favorable cost of capital as compared to larger follow-on offerings.
Material Cash Requirements
We had approximately $26.4 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand and $498.0 million in availability under our unsecured revolving credit facility as of January 31, 2023. Our expected material cash requirements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and thereafter consist of long-term debt maturities; interest on long-term debt; and contractually obligated expenditures. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity needs largely through cash generated from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility, refer to the Unsecured Bank Credit Facility discussion above, and sales from real estate investments, although we may choose to seek alternative sources of liquidity. Should we have additional liquidity needs, we believe that we could access long-term financing in the debt and equity capital markets.
The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2022 related to our material cash requirements ($ in thousands):
| Total | Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2023 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||
| Debt maturities | $ | 1,156,049 | $ | 415,408 | $ | 740,641 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payments | 64,685 | 37,666 | 27,019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Construction and loan commitments | 64,138 | 34,393 | 29,745 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,284,872 | $ | 487,467 | $ | 797,405 | |||||||||||||||
Our debt maturities in 2023 are comprised primarily of private placement notes of $125.0 million paid in January 2023, $50.0 million maturing in November 2023 and the 2023 Term Loan maturing in September 2023.
We believe our current liquidity position, supplemented by our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations in the future, and our low net leverage will be sufficient to meet all of our short-term and long-term financial commitments.
60
Loan and Development Commitments and Contingencies
The following tables summarize information as of December 31, 2022 related to our outstanding commitments and contingencies which are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements ($ in thousands):
| Asset Class | Type | Total | Funded | Remaining1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan Commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bickford Senior Living | SHO | Construction | $ | 28,900 | $ | (28,853) | $ | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living | SHO | Construction | 50,725 | (36,375) | 14,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | SHO | Revolving Credit | 20,000 | (15,847) | 4,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Timber Ridge OpCo | SHO | Working Capital | 5,000 | — | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watermark Retirement | SHO | Working Capital | 5,000 | (1,976) | 3,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montecito Medical Real Estate | MOB | Mezzanine Loan | 50,000 | (20,255) | 29,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 159,625 | $ | (103,306) | $ | 56,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Of the total, $26,574 is expected to be payable within 12 months with the remaining commitment due between three to five years.
See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for details of our loan commitments. As provided above, loans funded do not include the effects of discounts or commitment fees. The credit loss liability for unfunded loan commitments was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2022 and is estimated using the same methodology as for our funded mortgage and other notes receivable based on the estimated amount that we expect to fund.
| Asset Class | Type | Total | Funded | Remaining1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Woodland Village | SHO | Renovation | $ | 7,515 | $ | (7,425) | $ | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | SHO | Renovation | 9,930 | (9,930) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watermark Retirement | SHO | Renovation | 6,500 | (5,959) | 541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Navion Senior Solutions | SHO | Renovation | 3,500 | (1,062) | 2,438 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | SHO | Various | 4,550 | (1,300) | 3,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SHOP | ILF | Renovation | 1,500 | — | 1,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 33,495 | $ | (25,676) | $ | 7,819 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Expected to be payable within 12 months..
In addition to the commitments listed above, we have agreed to pay up to $0.8 million in additional cash consideration pending the results of an ongoing property tax appeal related to a property acquired in the second quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2022, no amount of this consideration is expected to be paid. One of our consolidated real estate partnerships, Discovery PropCo, has committed to fund up to $2.0 million toward the purchase of condominium units located at one of the facilities of which $1.0 million has been funded as of December 31, 2022.
| Asset Class | Total | Funded | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contingencies (Lease Inducements): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Timber Ridge OpCo | SHO | $ | 10,000 | $ | — | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| IntegraCare | SHO | 750 | — | 750 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wingate Healthcare | SHO | 5,000 | — | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Navion Senior Solutions | SHO | 4,850 | (2,700) | 2,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Discovery Senior Living | SHO | 4,000 | — | 4,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ignite Medical Resorts | SHO | 2,000 | — | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sante Partners | SHO | 2,000 | — | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 28,600 | $ | (2,700) | $ | 25,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
In February 2023, Timber Ridge OpCo formally requested payout of its $10.0 million lease inducement based upon the achievement of all performance conditions. The Company is confirming that all performance conditions were met and expects to fund the lease inducement payout in the first quarter of 2023.
61
We adjust rental income for the amortization of lease inducements paid to our tenants. Amortization of lease inducement payments against revenues was $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, which includes the write-off of $7.1 million of lease incentives related to Bickford in the second quarter of 2022 as discussed in more detail in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. Amortization of lease inducement payments against revenues was $1.0 million for both the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Capital funding commitments
Capital expenditures related to our Real Estate Investments segment are primarily for the acquisition of new investments. The leases for our properties in the Real Estate Investments segment generally require the tenant to pay for all repairs and maintenance expenses and a minimum amount of capital expenditures each year. The tenants are also required to maintain insurance coverage at least equal to the replacement cost of a property. Therefore, we do not expect material expenditures in 2023 related to existing properties in the Real Estate Investments segment.
The capital funding commitments in our SHOP segment are principally for improvements to our facilities. We expect our SHOP ventures to incur approximately $7.6 million in capital expenditures during 2023 that we anticipate will be funded partially from the net operating income generated from the ventures and additional capital contributions from the partners. We expect to fund our commitments to the ventures for capital expenditures with our operating cash flow and other existing liquidity sources.
Natural Disasters
During the year ended December 31, 2022, our properties incurred minimal to no damage relating to natural disaster events. We or our tenants may incur unplanned costs for minor repairs and restoring operations, as well as costs to evacuate employees and residents. Our lease agreements require our tenants to maintain sufficient property and business interruption insurance, subject to certain deductibles.
Litigation
For a description of our currently outstanding litigation, see “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
FFO & FAD
These supplemental performance measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other REITs. Consequently, our Funds From Operations (“FFO”), Normalized FFO and Normalized Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) may not provide a meaningful measure of our performance as compared to that of other REITs. Since other REITs may not use our definition of these measures, caution should be exercised when comparing our FFO, Normalized FFO and Normalized FAD to that of other REITs. These measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (these measures do not include changes in operating assets and liabilities) and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net earnings as an indication of performance, or to net cash flow from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of liquidity, and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
Funds From Operations - FFO
Our FFO per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $1.07 or 23.2% over the same period in 2021 due primarily to the write-offs of straight-line rents receivable and unamortized lease incentives totaling approximately $36.4 million, increased credit loss reserve of $9.4 million, increased legal fees of $1.7 million for the Welltower litigation and transition activities for the legacy Holiday portfolio and property dispositions completed since December 2021, partially offset by the recognition of the Holiday lease deposit of $8.8 million and escrow of $6.9 million in rental income, and reduced interest expense. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and applied by us, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate property, impairments of real estate, and real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, if any. The Company’s computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from that of the Company; therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our Company’s FFO to that of other REITs. Diluted FFO assumes the exercise of stock options and other potentially dilutive securities.
62
Our Normalized FFO per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $0.30 or 6.5% over the same period in 2021. Normalized FFO excludes from FFO certain items which, due to their infrequent or unpredictable nature, may create some difficulty in comparing FFO for the current period to similar prior periods, and may include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of non-real estate assets and liabilities, and recoveries of previous write-downs.
FFO and Normalized FFO are important supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative, and should be supplemented with a measure such as FFO. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue.
Funds Available for Distribution - FAD
Our Normalized FAD for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $8.4 million or 4.0% over the same period in 2021 due primarily to increased legal fees of $1.7 million for the Welltower litigation and transition activities for the legacy Holiday portfolio and property dispositions completed since December 2021, partially offset by the recognition of the Holiday lease deposit of $8.8 million and escrow of $6.9 million in rental income and reduced interest expense. In addition to the adjustments included in the calculation of Normalized FFO, Normalized FAD excludes the impact of any straight-line lease revenue, amortization of the original issue discount on our senior unsecured notes, amortization of debt issuance costs, and non-cash share based compensation. We also adjust Normalized FAD for the net change in our allowance for expected credit losses, non-cash share based compensation as well as certain non-cash items related to our equity method investments such as straight-line lease expense and amortization of purchase accounting adjustments.
Normalized FAD is an important supplemental performance measure for a REIT and a useful measure of liquidity as an indicator of the ability to distribute dividends to stockholders. GAAP requires a lessor to recognize contractual lease payments into income on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the lease. This straight-line adjustment has the effect of reporting lease income that is significantly more or less than the contractual cash flows received pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement. GAAP also requires any discount or premium related to indebtedness and debt issuance costs to be amortized as non-cash adjustments to earnings.
The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to FFO, Normalized FFO and Normalized FAD and is presented for both basic and diluted weighted average common shares for FFO and Normalized FFO ($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
63
| Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 66,403 | $ | 111,804 | $ | 185,126 | |||||||||||
| Elimination of certain non-cash items in net income: | |||||||||||||||||
| Real estate depreciation | 70,734 | 80,798 | 83,150 | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests | (1,393) | (839) | (777) | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | (28,342) | (32,498) | (21,316) | ||||||||||||||
| Impairments of real estate | 51,555 | 51,817 | — | ||||||||||||||
| NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders | 158,957 | 211,082 | 246,183 | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | 710 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Portfolio transition costs, net of noncontrolling interests | 426 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | (1,113) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | 151 | 1,912 | 3,924 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash write-offs of straight-line receivable and lease incentives | 36,353 | 709 | 380 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash rental income | (3,000) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Recognition of unamortized note receivable commitment fees | — | (375) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Lease termination fee | — | (2,464) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Litigation settlement | — | (616) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders | 192,484 | 210,248 | 250,487 | ||||||||||||||
| Straight-line lease revenue, net | (12,563) | (15,312) | (20,791) | ||||||||||||||
| Straight-line lease revenue, net, related to noncontrolling interests | 124 | 91 | 111 | ||||||||||||||
| Straight-line lease expense related to equity method investment | (16) | 46 | 113 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-real estate depreciation | 146 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Non-real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interest | (16) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of lease incentives | 446 | 1,026 | 987 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of original issue discount | 322 | 295 | 303 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 2,155 | 2,404 | 2,979 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization related to equity method investment | (847) | 1,109 | 1,261 | ||||||||||||||
| Note receivable credit loss expense | 10,356 | 949 | 991 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity method investment capital expenditures | (420) | (420) | (420) | ||||||||||||||
| Equity method investment non-refundable fees received | 1,206 | 622 | 660 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity method investment distributions | (569) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash share-based compensation | 8,613 | 8,415 | 3,061 | ||||||||||||||
| Senior housing portfolio recurring capital expenditures | (390) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Normalized FAD attributable to common stockholders | $ | 201,031 | $ | 209,473 | $ | 239,742 | |||||||||||
| BASIC | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 44,774,708 | 45,714,221 | 44,696,285 | ||||||||||||||
| NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 3.55 | $ | 4.62 | $ | 5.51 | |||||||||||
| Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 4.30 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 5.60 | |||||||||||
| DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 44,794,236 | 45,729,497 | 44,698,004 | ||||||||||||||
| NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 3.55 | $ | 4.62 | $ | 5.51 | |||||||||||
| Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 4.30 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 5.60 | |||||||||||
64
Adjusted EBITDA
We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important supplemental measure because it provides information which we use to evaluate our performance and serves as an indication of our ability to service debt. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions and certain items which, due to their infrequent or unpredictable nature, may create some difficulty in comparing Adjusted EBITDA for the current period to similar prior periods. These items include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of assets and liabilities, and recoveries of previous write-downs. Adjusted EBITDA also includes our proportionate share of unconsolidated equity method investments presented on a similar basis. Since others may not use our definition of Adjusted EBITDA, caution should be exercised when comparing our Adjusted EBITDA to that of other companies. EBITDA reflects GAAP interest expense, which excludes amounts capitalized during the period.
The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to Adjusted EBITDA ($ in thousands):
| Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 65,501 | $ | 111,967 | $ | 185,311 | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | 44,917 | 50,810 | 52,882 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise, excise and other taxes | 844 | 788 | 534 | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 70,880 | 80,798 | 83,150 | ||||||||||||||
| NHI’s share of EBITDA adjustments for unconsolidated entities | 2,976 | 2,848 | 1,495 | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | (28,342) | (32,498) | (21,316) | ||||||||||||||
| Impairments of real estate | 51,555 | 51,817 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | 710 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Litigation settlement | — | (616) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | (1,113) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | 151 | 1,912 | 3,924 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash write-off of straight-line rents receivable and lease amortization | 36,353 | 709 | 380 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash rental income | (3,000) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Note receivable credit loss expense | 10,356 | 949 | 991 | ||||||||||||||
| Lease termination fee | — | (2,464) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Recognition of unamortized note receivable commitment fees | — | (375) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 251,788 | $ | 266,645 | $ | 307,351 | |||||||||||
| Interest expense at contractual rates | $ | 42,487 | $ | 40,866 | $ | 43,458 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate swap payments, net | — | 7,306 | 6,352 | ||||||||||||||
| Principal payments | 389 | 371 | 1,082 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Charges | $ | 42,876 | $ | 48,543 | $ | 50,892 | |||||||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage | 5.9x | 5.5x | 6.0x | ||||||||||||||
For all periods presented, EBITDA reflects GAAP interest expense, which excludes amounts capitalized during the period.
Net Operating Income
NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate. We define NOI as total revenues, less tenant reimbursements and property operating expenses. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and useful information as it measures the operating performance of our properties at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties.
65
The following table reconciles NOI to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric ($ in thousands):
| Years Ended | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| NOI Reconciliations: | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 65,501 | $ | 111,967 | ||||||||||
| (Gains) losses from equity method investment | (569) | 1,545 | ||||||||||||
| Interest income and other | — | (350) | ||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | 151 | 1,912 | ||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | (1,113) | — | ||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | 710 | — | ||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | (28,342) | (32,498) | ||||||||||||
| Loan and realty losses | 61,911 | 52,766 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 22,768 | 18,431 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise, excise and other taxes | 844 | 788 | ||||||||||||
| Legal | 2,555 | 908 | ||||||||||||
| Interest | 44,917 | 50,810 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 70,880 | 80,798 | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated net operating income (NOI) | $ | 240,213 | $ | 287,077 | ||||||||||
| NOI by segment: | ||||||||||||||
| Real Estate Investments | $ | 232,295 | $ | 283,945 | ||||||||||
| SHOP | 7,603 | — | ||||||||||||
| Non-Segment/Corporate | 315 | 3,132 | ||||||||||||
| Total NOI | $ | 240,213 | $ | 287,077 | ||||||||||
66
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2022, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on approximately $282.0 million of variable-rate indebtedness and on our mortgage and other notes receivable. The unused portion ($658.0 million at December 31, 2022) of our revolving credit facility, should it be drawn upon, is subject to variable rates.
Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt and loans receivable unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate debt and investments would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a 50 basis-point increase or decrease in the interest rate related to variable-rate debt, and assuming no change in the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2022, net interest expense would increase or decrease annually by approximately $1.4 million or $0.03 per common share on a diluted basis.
We have historically used derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to mitigate interest rate risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivatives, if any, are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value. We may engage in hedging strategies to manage our exposure to market risks in the future, depending on an analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. We had no derivative financial instruments outstanding during 2022.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our debt ($ in thousands):
67
To highlight the sensitivity of our term loans, senior notes and secured mortgage debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects on fair value (“FV”) assuming a parallel shift of 50 basis points (“bps”) in market interest rates for a contract with similar maturities as of December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
At December 31, 2022, the fair value of our mortgage and other notes receivable, discounted for estimated changes in the risk-free rate, was approximately $227.6 million. A 50 basis-point increase in market rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our mortgage and other loans by approximately $3.5 million, while a 50 basis-point decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $2.7 million.
Equity Price Risk
The Company is not subject to equity risk since it owns no marketable securities.
Inflation Risk
Our real estate leases generally provide for annual increases in contractual rent due based on a fixed amount or percentage or based on increases in the CPI. Leases with increases based on CPI may contain a minimum or a cap on the maximum annual increase. Substantially all of our leases require the tenant to pay all operating expenses for the property, whether paid directly by the tenant or reimbursed to us. We believe that inflationary increases will be at least partially offset by the contractual rent increases and expense reimbursements described above.
68
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Stockholders and Board of Directors
National Health Investors, Inc.
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Health Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated February 21, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Asset Impairment - Real Estate Properties
The Company had total real estate properties, net of approximately $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. As described in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of its real estate properties when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions, and significant deterioration of the underlying cash flows of a property indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. A real estate property is impaired when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the property are less than the net carrying amount of the property. The Company recognized approximately $51.6 million in impairments for the year ended December 31, 2022.
69
We identified management’s identification and assessment of the indicators of potential impairment of real estate properties as a critical audit matter. Identification of a potential impairment of real estate properties including due to significant physical changes in the property, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions, or significant deterioration of the underlying cash flows of the property requires a high degree of judgment. Auditing these judgments was especially challenging and complex due to the nature and extent of auditor effort required to address these matters.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
•Assessing the reasonableness of management’s assumptions and inputs, including property specific factors for certain properties that included changes to the physical condition of the property, changes in general economic conditions, going concern uncertainties identified by certain tenants, and deterioration of the underlying cash flows of the property, including due to declines in occupancy, which are used by management to identify and assess whether an impairment indicator existed.
•Reviewing internal documentation relevant to the analysis for certain properties including Board of Director minutes, letters of intent, and operations department communications, as applicable on a property-by-property basis, including for certain properties with lower lease coverage ratios, to assess whether additional indicators of impairment were present.
Variable Interest Entity Accounting – SHOP Ventures
As described in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management consolidates a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for which control of the entity is achieved through means other than voting rights and the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. During 2022, the Company formed the Merrill Gardens and Discovery joint ventures (collectively referred to as the “SHOP ventures”). The Company, as the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, consolidated the SHOP ventures. The Discovery member’s agreement was also amended in the fourth quarter of 2022.
We identified the accounting for the consolidation of the SHOP ventures, including the reconsideration caused by the amendment to the Discovery member’s agreement, as a critical audit matter. Determination of whether the SHOP ventures meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Company is the primary beneficiary required significant judgment by management to determine which activities significantly impact the design and purpose of each entity, whether equity members, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, and which equity holder has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of each entity. In turn, increased auditor effort, including the involvement of professionals with specialized knowledge in consolidation accounting assessments, was required to evaluate management’s judgments.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
•Analyzing the agreements and other relevant documents to determine the design, purpose and significant activities of the SHOP ventures and the nature of the rights conveyed to the Company through its equity investments in these entities.
•Utilizing professionals with specialized knowledge and experience in consolidation accounting assessments to assist in evaluating the significant judgments impacting management’s conclusion as to whether the Company should consolidate the SHOP ventures.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004.
Nashville, Tennessee
February 21, 2023
70
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| Assets: | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Real estate properties: | |||||||||||
| Land | $ | 177,527 | $ | 186,658 | |||||||
| Buildings and improvements | 2,549,019 | 2,707,422 | |||||||||
| Construction in progress | 3,352 | 468 | |||||||||
| 2,729,898 | 2,894,548 | ||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | (611,688) | (576,668) | |||||||||
| Real estate properties, net | 2,118,210 | 2,317,880 | |||||||||
Mortgage and other notes receivable, net of reserve of $15,338 and $5,210, respectively | 233,141 | 299,952 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 19,291 | 37,412 | |||||||||
| Straight-line rent receivable | 76,895 | 96,198 | |||||||||
| Assets held for sale, net | 43,302 | 66,398 | |||||||||
| Other assets, net | 16,585 | 21,036 | |||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 2,507,424 | $ | 2,838,876 | |||||||
| Liabilities and Equity: | |||||||||||
| Debt | $ | 1,147,511 | $ | 1,242,883 | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 25,905 | 23,181 | |||||||||
| Dividends payable | 39,050 | 41,266 | |||||||||
| Lease deposit liabilities | — | 8,838 | |||||||||
| Deferred income | 5,052 | 5,725 | |||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 1,217,518 | 1,321,893 | |||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies | |||||||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interest | 9,825 | — | |||||||||
| National Health Investors, Inc. Stockholders' Equity: | |||||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; | |||||||||||
43,388,742 and 45,850,599 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 434 | 459 | |||||||||
| Capital in excess of par value | 1,599,427 | 1,591,182 | |||||||||
| Cumulative dividends in excess of net income | (329,636) | (84,558) | |||||||||
| Total National Health Investors, Inc. Stockholders' Equity | 1,270,225 | 1,507,083 | |||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | 9,856 | 9,900 | |||||||||
| Total Equity | 1,280,081 | 1,516,983 | |||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 2,507,424 | $ | 2,838,876 | |||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
71
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
| Rental income | $ | 217,700 | $ | 271,049 | $ | 307,208 | |||||||||||
| Resident fees and services | 35,796 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Interest income and other | 24,698 | 27,666 | 25,603 | ||||||||||||||
| 278,194 | 298,715 | 332,811 | |||||||||||||||
| Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 70,880 | 80,798 | 83,150 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest | 44,917 | 50,810 | 52,882 | ||||||||||||||
| Senior housing operating expenses | 28,193 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Legal | 2,555 | 908 | 1,252 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise, excise and other taxes | 844 | 788 | 534 | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 22,768 | 18,431 | 13,304 | ||||||||||||||
| Taxes and insurance on leased properties | 9,788 | 11,638 | 9,653 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan and realty losses | 61,911 | 52,766 | 991 | ||||||||||||||
| 241,856 | 216,139 | 161,766 | |||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | (710) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | 1,113 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | (151) | (1,912) | (3,924) | ||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) from equity method investment | 569 | (1,545) | (3,126) | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | 28,342 | 32,498 | 21,316 | ||||||||||||||
| Other income | — | 350 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net income | 65,501 | 111,967 | 185,311 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 902 | (163) | (185) | ||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 66,403 | $ | 111,804 | $ | 185,126 | |||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 44,774,708 | 45,714,221 | 44,696,285 | ||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 44,794,236 | 45,729,497 | 44,698,004 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic | $ | 1.48 | $ | 2.45 | $ | 4.14 | |||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - diluted | $ | 1.48 | $ | 2.44 | $ | 4.14 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
72
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
($ in thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 65,501 | $ | 111,967 | $ | 185,311 | |||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||||
| Decrease in fair value of cash flow hedges | — | (137) | (10,047) | ||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income | — | 7,286 | 6,330 | ||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | — | 7,149 | (3,717) | ||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | 65,501 | 119,116 | 181,594 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 902 | (163) | (185) | ||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 66,403 | $ | 118,953 | $ | 181,409 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
73
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 65,501 | $ | 111,967 | $ | 185,311 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | |||||||||||||||||
| operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 70,880 | 80,798 | 83,150 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of deferred loan costs, debt discounts and prepaids | 4,283 | 4,354 | 5,392 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of commitment fees and note receivable discounts | (872) | (729) | (867) | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of lease incentives | 7,555 | 1,026 | 987 | ||||||||||||||
| Straight-line lease revenue | 16,681 | (14,603) | (20,411) | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash rental income | (3,000) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash interest income on mortgage and other notes receivable | (4,314) | (2,614) | (3,839) | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash lease deposit liability recognized as rental income | (8,838) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | (28,342) | (32,498) | (21,316) | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | (1,113) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | 710 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | 151 | 1,912 | 3,924 | ||||||||||||||
| (Gains) losses from equity method investment | (569) | 1,545 | 3,126 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan and realty losses | 61,911 | 52,766 | 991 | ||||||||||||||
| Payment of lease incentives | (1,200) | (1,042) | (623) | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash share-based compensation | 8,613 | 8,415 | 3,061 | ||||||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Other assets, net | (3,534) | (4,050) | 160 | ||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 425 | 3,352 | (6,681) | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred income | 412 | 260 | (217) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 185,340 | 210,859 | 232,148 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment in mortgage and other notes receivable | (79,801) | (72,236) | (58,356) | ||||||||||||||
| Collection of mortgage and other notes receivable | 119,212 | 67,790 | 46,612 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of real estate | (6,364) | (46,817) | (102,712) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sales of real estate | 168,958 | 238,864 | 39,631 | ||||||||||||||
| Investments in renovations of existing real estate | (4,629) | (3,465) | (13,854) | ||||||||||||||
| Investments in equipment | — | (64) | (158) | ||||||||||||||
| Investment in equity method investment | — | — | (875) | ||||||||||||||
| Distributions from equity method investment | 569 | 1,205 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 197,945 | 185,277 | (89,712) | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from revolving credit facility | 225,000 | 95,000 | 205,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Payments on revolving credit facility | (183,000) | (393,000) | (207,000) | ||||||||||||||
| Borrowings on term loans | — | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Payments on term loans | (135,388) | (293,316) | (43,729) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | — | 396,784 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Prepayment fee for early retirement of debt | — | (1,462) | (1,619) | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred loan costs | (4,612) | (5,018) | (1,039) | ||||||||||||||
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (916) | (910) | (748) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from noncontrolling interests | 11,738 | — | 13 | ||||||||||||||
| Taxes remitted on employee stock awards | (288) | — | (2,705) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from equity offering, net | — | 47,904 | 34,649 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance costs | (66) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Convertible bond redemption | — | (66,076) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid to stockholders | (161,771) | (182,900) | (194,584) | ||||||||||||||
| Payments to repurchase shares of common stock | (151,951) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (401,254) | (402,994) | (111,762) | ||||||||||||||
| (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | (17,969) | (6,858) | 30,674 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year | 39,485 | 46,343 | 15,669 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year | $ | 21,516 | $ | 39,485 | $ | 46,343 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
74
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
($ in thousands)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 42,659 | $ | 43,680 | $ | 43,406 | |||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Real estate acquired in exchange for mortgage notes receivable | $ | 23,071 | $ | — | $ | 63,220 | |||||||||||
| Noncash portion of noncontrolling interest conveyed in acquisition | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,778 | |||||||||||
| Increase in mortgage note receivable from sale of real estate | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,000 | |||||||||||
| Change in other assets related to investments in real estate | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 348 | |||||||||||
| Change in other assets related to sales of real estate | $ | 102 | $ | (33) | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Change in accounts payable related to investments in real estate construction | $ | 20 | $ | (62) | $ | 784 | |||||||||||
| Change in accounts payable related to renovations of existing real estate | $ | (37) | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Change in accounts payable related to distributions to noncontrolling interests | $ | 139 | $ | 64 | $ | 138 | |||||||||||
| Operating equipment received in lease termination | $ | 1,287 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Increase in accounts payable related to transfer of operations | $ | 300 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
75
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
($ in thousands except share and per share amounts)
| Common Stock | Capital in Excess of Par Value | Cumulative Dividends in Excess of Net Income | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total National Health Investors Stockholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2019 | 44,587,486 | $ | 446 | $ | 1,505,948 | $ | (5,331) | $ | (3,432) | $ | 1,497,631 | $ | 621 | $ | 1,498,252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | — | — | (4,225) | — | (4,225) | — | (4,225) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests capital contribution | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,791 | 10,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions declared to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (886) | (886) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | 185,126 | (3,717) | 181,409 | 185 | 181,594 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock, net | 535,990 | 5 | 34,644 | — | — | 34,649 | — | 34,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes remitted on employee stock awards | — | — | (2,705) | — | — | (2,705) | — | (2,705) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued on stock options exercised | 62,516 | 1 | (2) | — | — | (1) | — | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 3,061 | — | — | 3,061 | — | 3,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, $4.41 per common share | — | — | — | (197,585) | — | (197,585) | — | (197,585) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2020 | 45,185,992 | 452 | 1,540,946 | (22,015) | (7,149) | 1,512,234 | 10,711 | 1,522,945 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions declared to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (974) | (974) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | 111,804 | 7,149 | 118,953 | 163 | 119,116 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock, net | 661,951 | 7 | 47,897 | — | — | 47,904 | — | 47,904 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity component in redemption of convertible debt | — | — | (6,076) | — | — | (6,076) | — | (6,076) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued on stock options exercised | 2,656 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 8,415 | — | — | 8,415 | — | 8,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, $3.8025 per common share | — | — | — | (174,347) | — | (174,347) | — | (174,347) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2021 | 45,850,599 | 459 | 1,591,182 | (84,558) | — | 1,507,083 | 9,900 | 1,516,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared to noncontrolling interests, excluding $40 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,015) | (1,015) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income, excluding a loss of $843 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | 66,403 | — | 66,403 | (59) | 66,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification of redeemable noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,030 | 1,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity issuance cost | — | — | (80) | — | — | (80) | — | (80) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes remitted on employee stock awards | — | — | (288) | — | — | (288) | — | (288) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued on stock options exercised | 6,497 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchases of common stock | (2,468,354) | (25) | — | (151,926) | — | (151,951) | — | (151,951) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 8,613 | — | — | 8,613 | — | 8,613 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, $3.60 per common share | — | — | — | (159,555) | — | (159,555) | — | (159,555) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2022 | 43,388,742 | $ | 434 | $ | 1,599,427 | $ | (329,636) | $ | — | $ | 1,270,225 | $ | 9,856 | $ | 1,280,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
76
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2022
Note 1. Organization and Nature of Business
National Health Investors, Inc. (“NHI,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in sale-leaseback, joint venture and mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical facility investments. We operate through two reportable segments: Real Estate Investments and Senior Housing Operating Portfolio (“SHOP”). Our Real Estate Investments segment consists of real estate investments and lease, mortgage and other notes receivables in independent living facilities (“ILF”), assisted living facilities (“ALF”), entrance-fee communities (“EFC”), senior living campuses (“SLC”), skilled nursing facilities (“SNF”) and a hospital (“HOSP”). As of December 31, 2022, we had investments of approximately $2.4 billion in 160 health-care real estate properties located in 32 states and leased pursuant primarily to triple-net leases to 24 tenants consisting of 94 senior housing communities (“SHO”), 65 SNFs and one hospital, excluding 13 properties classified as assets held for sale. Our portfolio of 17 mortgages along with other notes receivable totaled $248.5 million, excluding an allowance for expected credit losses of $15.3 million, as of December 31, 2022. Units and beds disclosures in these consolidated financial statements are unaudited.
Our SHOP segment is comprised of two ventures that own the operations of ILFs. As of December 31, 2022, we had investments of approximately $338.1 million in 15 properties with a combined 1,732 units located in eight states that are operated on behalf of the Company by two independent managers pursuant to the terms of separate management agreements that commenced April 1, 2022. The third-party managers, or related parties of the managers, own equity interests in the respective ventures.
Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, joint ventures and subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest. We also consolidate certain entities when control of such entities can be achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of such entities. All material intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
We evaluate our arrangements with VIEs to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In accordance with FASB guidance, management must evaluate each of the Company’s contractual relationships which creates a variable interest in other entities. If the Company has a variable interest and the entity is a VIE, then management must determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If it is determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary, NHI would consolidate the VIE. We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.
If the Company has determined that an entity is not a VIE, the Company assesses the need for consolidation under all other provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidation. These provisions provide for consolidation of majority-owned entities where a majority voting interest held by the Company demonstrates control of such entities in the absence of any legal constraints.
Effective April 1, 2022 and at December 31, 2022, our consolidated total assets and liabilities include two consolidated ventures comprising our SHOP activities formed with two separate partners - Merrill Gardens, L.L.C. (“Merrill”) and DSHI NHI Holiday LLC (the “Discovery member”), a related party of Discovery Senior Living. We consider both ventures to be VIEs as the members of each, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. We are deemed to be the primary beneficiary because we have the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact each VIE’s economic
77
performance. The assets of the ventures primarily consist of real estate properties, cash and cash equivalents, and resident fees and services (accounts receivable). Their obligations primarily consist of operating expenses of the ILFs (accounts payable and accrued expenses) and capital expenditures for the properties. Assets of the consolidated SHOP ventures that can be used only to settle obligations of each respective SHOP venture primarily include approximately $260.6 million of real estate properties, net, $6.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and $1.3 million of accounts receivable, net. Liabilities of the consolidated SHOP ventures for which creditors do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company are not material. Reference Notes 5 and 10 for further discussion of these new ventures.
We also consolidate two real estate partnerships formed with our partners, Discovery Senior Housing Investor XXIV, LLC, a related party of Discovery Senior Living, and LCS Timber Ridge LLC, to invest in senior housing facilities. We consider both partnerships to be VIEs as either the members, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or the total equity at risk is insufficient to finance activities without additional subordinated financial support. NHI directs the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of these ventures, subject to limited protective rights extended to our partners for specified business decisions. Because of our control of these partnerships, we include their assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and operations in our consolidated financial statements.
At December 31, 2022, we held interests in nine unconsolidated VIEs, and, because we lack either directly or through related parties the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance, we have concluded that the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, we account for our transactions with these entities and their subsidiaries at either amortized cost or net realizable value for straight-line rent receivables, excluding our investment accounted for under the equity method.
The Company’s unconsolidated VIEs are summarized below by date of initial involvement. For further discussion of the nature of the relationships, including the sources of exposure to these VIEs, see the notes to our consolidated financial statements cross-referenced below ($ in thousands).
| Date | Name | Source of Exposure | Carrying Amount | Maximum Exposure to Loss | Note Reference | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | Senior Living Communities | Notes and straight-line receivable | $ | 90,196 | $ | 94,349 | Notes 3, 4 | ||||||||||
| 2016 | Senior Living Management | Notes | $ | 24,500 | $ | 24,500 | — | ||||||||||
| 2018 | Bickford Senior Living | Notes and funding commitment | $ | 32,976 | $ | 46,023 | Notes 3, 4 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | Encore Senior Living | Notes and straight-line receivable | $ | 39,091 | $ | 53,416 | Notes 3, 4 | ||||||||||
| 2020 | Timber Ridge OpCo, LLC | Various1 | $ | (5,000) | $ | — | Note 6 | ||||||||||
| 2020 | Watermark Retirement | Notes and straight-line receivable | $ | 7,875 | $ | 10,898 | Note 4 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | Montecito Medical Real Estate | Notes and funding commitment | $ | 20,255 | $ | 50,000 | Note 4 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | Vizion Health | Notes and straight-line receivable | $ | 19,791 | $ | 23,015 | Notes 3, 4 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | Navion Senior Solutions | Various2 | $ | 8,127 | $ | 14,065 | Notes 3, 4 | ||||||||||
1Loan commitment, equity method investment and straight-line rent receivables
2 Notes, loan commitments, straight-line rent receivables, and unamortized lease incentives
We are not obligated to provide support beyond our stated commitments to these tenants and borrowers whom we classify as VIEs, and accordingly, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of these relationships is limited to the amount of our commitments, as shown above and discussed in the notes. Economic loss on a lease, in excess of what is presented in the table above, if any, would be limited to that resulting from any period of non-payment of rent before we are able to take effective remedial action, as well as costs incurred in transitioning the lease to a new tenant. The potential extent of such loss would be dependent upon individual facts and circumstances, and is therefore not included in the table above.
In the future, NHI may be deemed the primary beneficiary of the operations if the tenants or borrowers do not have adequate liquidity to accept the risks and rewards as the tenant and operator of the properties and might be required to consolidate the financial position and results of operations of the tenants or borrowers into our consolidated financial statements.
We use the equity method of accounting when we own an interest in an entity whereby we can exert significant influence over but cannot control the entity’s operations. We discontinue equity method accounting if our investment in an entity (and net advances) is reduced to zero unless we have guaranteed obligations of the entity or are otherwise committed to provide further financial support for the entity. Reference Note 6 for further discussion of our equity method investment.
78
We structured our Timber Ridge OpCo investment to be compliant with the provisions of RIDEA which permits us to receive rent payments through a triple-net lease between a property company and an operating company and allows us to receive distributions from the operating company to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). Our TRS holds our equity interests in unconsolidated operating companies thus providing an organizational structure that allows the TRS to engage in a broad range of activities and share in revenues that are otherwise non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income tests.
Noncontrolling Interests
Contingently redeemable noncontrolling interests are recorded at their initial carrying amounts upon issuance and are subsequently adjusted to reflect their share of gains or losses and distributions attributable to the noncontrolling interests. In periods where they are or will become probable of redemption, an adjustment to the redemption value of the noncontrolling interests is also recognized through “Capital in excess of par value” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and included in our computation of earnings per share. As of December 31, 2022, the Merrill SHOP venture noncontrolling interest was classified as mezzanine equity, as discussed further in Note 10.
We consolidate the real estate partnerships formed with Discovery in June 2019 and LCS in January 2020, both of which invest in senior housing facilities. The noncontrolling interests associated with these two consolidated real estate partnerships, along with our Discovery member SHOP venture were classified as equity as of December 31, 2022.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant assumptions and estimates include purchase price allocations to record investments in real estate, impairment of real estate, and allowance for credit losses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Earnings Per Share - The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period is used to calculate basic earnings per common share. Diluted earnings per common share assume the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method, to the extent dilutive. Diluted earnings per share also incorporates the potential dilutive impact of our convertible debt that was repaid in 2021. We apply the treasury stock method to convertible debt instruments, the effect of which is that conversion will not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share unless the average share price of our common stock for the period exceeds the conversion price per share.
Fair Value Measurements - Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level fair value hierarchy is required to prioritize the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
If the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. When an event or circumstance alters our assessment of the observability and thus the appropriate classification of an input to a fair value measurement which we deem to be significant to the fair value measurement as a whole, we will transfer that fair value measurement to the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy.
79
Real Property Owned - Real estate properties are recorded at cost or, if acquired through business combination, at fair value, including the fair value of contingent consideration, if any. Cost or fair value at the time of acquisition is allocated among land, buildings, improvements, personal property and lease and other intangibles. For properties acquired in transactions accounted for as asset purchases, the purchase price, which includes transaction costs, is allocated based on the relative fair values of the assets acquired. Cost includes the amount of contingent consideration, if any, deemed to be probable at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is deemed to be probable to the extent that a significant reversal in amounts recognized is not likely to occur when the uncertainty associated with the contingent consideration is subsequently resolved. Cost also includes capitalized interest during construction periods. We use the straight-line method of depreciation for buildings over their estimated useful lives of 40 years, and improvements, including any equipment related to the SHOP segment, over their estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 25 years. For contingent consideration arising from business combinations, the liability is adjusted to estimated fair value at each reporting date through earnings.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions and significant deterioration of the underlying cash flows of the long-lived assets, indicate that the carrying amount of the long-lived asset may not be recoverable. The need to recognize an impairment charge is based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows compared to the carrying amount. If recognition of an impairment charge is necessary, it is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset.
During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we recognized impairment charges of approximately $51.6 million and $51.8 million, respectively, included in “Loan and realty losses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Reference Note 3 for more discussion.
Leases - Leases entered into or modified since 2019 are accounted for under the guidance of ASC Topic 842, Leases. All of our leases are classified as operating leases and generally have an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years followed by one or more five-year tenant renewal options. The leases are “triple-net leases” under which the tenant is responsible for the payment of all taxes, utilities, insurance premiums, repairs and other charges relating to the operation of the properties, including required levels of capital expenditures each year. The tenant is obligated at its expense to keep all improvements, fixtures and other components of the properties covered by “all risk” insurance in an amount equal to at least the full replacement cost thereof, and to maintain specified minimal personal injury and property damage insurance. The leases also require the tenant to indemnify and hold us harmless from all claims resulting from the use, occupancy and related activities of each property by the tenant, and to indemnify us against all costs related to any release, discovery, clean-up and removal of hazardous substances or materials, or other environmental responsibility with respect to each facility. While we do not incorporate residual value guarantees, the lease provisions and considerations discussed above impact our expectation of realizable value from our properties upon the expiration of their lease terms. The residual value of our real estate under lease is still subject to various market, asset, and tenant-specific risks and characteristics. As the classification of our leases is dependent on the fair value of estimated cash flows at lease commencement, management’s projected residual values represent significant assumptions in our accounting for operating leases. Similarly, the exercise of renewal options is also subject to these same risks, making a tenant’s lease term another significant variable in a lease’s cash flows. Initial direct costs that are incremental to entering into a lease are capitalized in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 842.
FASB Lease Modifications Related to Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic - In April 2020, the FASB issued a question-and-answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of the coronavirus pandemic (“COVID-19”). The Lease Modification Q&A clarifies that entities may elect not to evaluate whether lease-related relief provided to mitigate the economic effects of COVID-19 is a lease modification under ASC Topic 842. Instead, an entity that elects not to evaluate whether a concession directly related to COVID-19 is a modification, can elect whether to apply the modification guidance if it does not substantially increase either its rights as lessor or the obligations of the tenant. An entity should apply the election consistently to leases with similar characteristics and circumstances. As of December 31, 2022, the Company provided $44.3 million in lease concessions as a result of COVID-19, as discussed in more detail in Note 9. NHI elected not to apply the modification guidance under ASC Topic 842 and accounted for the related concessions as variable lease payments, recorded as rental income when received.
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses - With the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses effective January 1, 2020, we estimate and record an allowance for credit losses upon origination of the loan, based on expected credit losses over the term of the loan and update this estimate each reporting period. We calculate the estimated credit losses on mortgages by pooling these loans into two groups – investments in existing or new mortgages and construction mortgages. Mezzanine, revolving lines of credit and loans designated as non-performing are evaluated at the
80
individual loan level. We estimate the allowance for credit losses by utilizing a loss model that relies on future expected credit losses, rather than incurred losses. This loss model incorporates our historical experience, adjusted for current conditions and our forecasts, using the probability of default and loss given default method. Incorporated into the construction mortgage loss model is an estimate of the probability that NHI will acquire the property. Using the resulting estimate, a portion of the outstanding construction mortgage balance which we currently expect will be reduced by our acquisition of the underlying property when construction is complete, is deducted from the construction mortgage balance included in the expected loss calculation. Mezzanine loans, revolving lines of credit and loans designated as non-performing are also based on the loss model to recognize expected future credit losses and are applied to each individual loan using borrower specific information. We also perform a qualitative assessment beyond model estimates and apply adjustments as necessary. The credit loss estimate is based on the net amortized cost balance of our mortgage and other notes receivables as of the balance sheet date.
Calculation of the allowance for credit losses involves significant judgment. It is possible that actual credit losses will differ materially from our current estimates. Write-offs are deducted from the allowance for credit losses when we judge the principal to be uncollectible.
Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, we recorded an allowance for expected credit losses of $3.9 million that is reflected as an adjustment to “Mortgage and other notes receivable, net of reserve” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded a corresponding cumulative-effect adjustment to “Cumulative dividends in excess of net income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also recorded a $0.3 million reserve for estimated credit losses pertaining to unfunded loan commitments as an adjustment to “Cumulative dividends in excess of net income”. The corresponding credit loss liability is included in the financial statement line item “Accounts payable and accrued expenses” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - Cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Restricted cash includes amounts required to be held on deposit or subject to an agreement (e.g. with a qualified intermediary subject to an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange agreement or in accordance with agency agreements governing our mortgages).
The following table sets forth our “Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash” reported within the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ($ in thousands):
| As of December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 19,291 | $ | 37,412 | |||||||
| Restricted cash (included in Other assets, net) | 2,225 | 2,073 | |||||||||
| $ | 21,516 | $ | 39,485 | ||||||||
Assets Held for Sale - We consider properties to be assets held for sale when (1) management commits to a plan to sell the property, (2) it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued; (3) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (4) actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated; (5) sale of the property is probable and we anticipate the completed sale will occur within one year; and (6) the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable given our estimate of current market value. Upon designation of a property as an asset held for sale, we record the property’s value at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less estimated transaction costs. Depreciation and amortization of the property are discontinued.
Concentration of Credit Risks - Our credit risks primarily relate to cash and cash equivalents and investments in mortgage and other notes receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in bank accounts and overnight investments. We maintain our bank deposit accounts with large financial institutions in amounts that often exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts. Our mortgages and other notes receivable consist primarily of secured loans on facilities.
Our financial instruments, principally our investments in notes receivable, are subject to the possibility of loss of the carrying values as a result of the failure of other parties to perform according to their contractual obligations which may make the instruments less valuable. We obtain collateral in the form of mortgage liens and other protective rights for notes receivable and continually monitor these rights in order to reduce such possibilities of loss. We evaluate the need to provide for reserves for potential losses on our financial instruments based on management’s periodic review of our portfolio on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
81
Deferred Loan Costs - Costs incurred to acquire debt are capitalized and amortized by the straight-line method, which approximates the effective-interest method, over the term of the related debt.
Deferred Income - Deferred income primarily includes rents received in advance from tenants and non-refundable commitment fees received by us, which are amortized into income over the expected period of the related loan or lease. In the event that our financing commitment to a potential borrower or tenant expires, the related commitment fees are recognized into income immediately. Commitment fees may be charged based on the terms of the lease agreements and the creditworthiness of the parties.
Revenue Recognition
Rental Income - Our leases generally provide for rent escalators throughout the term of the lease. Base rental income is recognized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease to the extent that lease payments are considered collectible and the lease provides for specific contractual escalators. Under certain leases, we receive additional contingent rent, which is calculated on the increase in revenues of the tenant over a base year or base quarter. We recognize contingent rent annually or quarterly based on the actual revenues of the tenant once the target threshold has been achieved. Lease payments that depend on a factor directly related to future use of the property, such as an increase in annual revenues over a base year, are considered to be contingent rentals and are excluded from the schedule of minimum lease payments.
If rental income calculated on a straight-line basis exceeds the cash rent due under a lease, the difference is recorded as an increase to straight-line rent receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and an increase in rental income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. If rental income on a straight-line basis is calculated to be less than cash received, there is a decrease in the same accounts.
Property operating expenses that are reimbursed by our operators are recorded as “Rental income” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Accordingly, we record a corresponding expense, reflected in “Taxes and insurance on leased properties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Rental income includes reimbursement of property operating expenses for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020, totaling $9.8 million, $11.6 million and $9.7 million, respectively.
Rental income is reduced for the non-cash amortization of payments made upon the eventual settlement of commitments and contingencies originally identified and recorded as lease inducements. We record lease inducements to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of amounts recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the contingent consideration is subsequently resolved.
The Company reviews its operating lease receivables for collectability on a regular basis, taking into consideration changes in factors such as the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area where the property is located. In the event that collectability with respect to any tenant is not probable, a direct write-off of the receivable is made as an adjustment to rental income and any future rental revenue is recognized only when the tenant makes a rental payment. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we placed three operators on cash basis of rental income recognition. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we placed Holiday Retirement (“Holiday”) on cash basis for its master lease. Reference Note 3 for further discussion.
Resident Fees and Services - Resident fee revenue associated with our SHOP activities is recognized as the related performance obligations are satisfied and includes resident room and care charges, community fees and other resident charges.
Residency agreements are generally short term (30 days to one year), and entitle the resident to certain room and care services for a monthly fee billed in advance. Revenue for certain related services is billed monthly in arrears. The Company has elected the lessor practical expedient within ASC 842, Leases, to not separate the lease and nonlease components within our resident agreements as the timing and pattern of transfer to the resident are the same. The Company has determined that the nonlease component is the predominant component within the contract and will recognize revenue under ASC 606, Revenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers.
Interest Income from Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable - Interest income is recognized based on the interest rates and principal amounts outstanding on the notes receivable. We identify a mortgage loan as non-performing if a required payment is not received within 30 days of the date it is due or a borrower’s current financial condition indicates a probability it cannot pay its current contractual amounts. A non-performing loan is returned to accrual status at such time as the loan becomes contractually current and management believes all future principal and interest will be received according to the contractual loan terms. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we designated a mortgage note receivable and a mezzanine loan totaling an aggregate $24.5 million with affiliates of one operator/borrower as non-performing.
82
Derivatives - In the normal course of business, we are subject to risk from adverse fluctuations in interest rates. Occasionally, we may choose to manage this risk through the use of derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps. Counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our objective in managing exposure to market risk is to limit the impact on cash flows relating to the change in market interest rates on our variable rate debt.
To qualify for hedge accounting, our interest rate swaps must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. In addition, at inception of a qualifying cash flow hedging relationship, the underlying transaction or transactions must be, and be expected to remain, probable of occurring in accordance with our related assertions. All of our hedges are cash flow hedges.
We recognize all derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated, as assets or liabilities at their fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the criteria of hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), whereas the change in fair value of any ineffective portion is recognized in earnings. Gains and losses are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings once the underlying hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.
Income Tax - We intend at all times to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and make distributions to stockholders at least equal to or in excess of 90% our taxable income. Certain activities that we undertake may be conducted by entities that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs). TRSs are subject to federal, state, and local income taxes. Accordingly, a provision for income taxes has been made in the consolidated financial statements. A failure to qualify under the applicable REIT qualification rules and regulations would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to stockholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due primarily to differences in the basis of assets, estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation expense, gains on sales of real estate, non-cash compensation expense and recognition of commitment fees.
Our tax returns filed for years beginning in 2019 are subject to examination by taxing authorities. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in our Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of income tax expense.
Segments - We operate our business through two reportable segments: Real Estate Investments and SHOP. In our Real Estate Investments segment, we invest in (i) senior housing and healthcare real estate and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under triple-net leases that obligate tenants to pay all property-related expenses and (ii) mortgage and other notes receivable throughout the United States. Our SHOP segment is comprised of the operations of 15 ILFs located throughout the United States that are operated on behalf of the Company by two independent managers pursuant to the terms of separate management agreements that commenced April 1, 2022. Reference Notes 5 and 16 for additional information.
Note 3. Investment Activity
Asset Acquisition
2022 Acquisitions and New Leases of Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we completed the following real estate acquisitions within our Real Estate Investments reportable segment as described below ($ in thousands):
| Operator | Date | Properties | Asset Class | Land | Building and Improvements | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living | Q2 2022 | 1 | ALF | $ | 542 | $ | 12,758 | $ | 13,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bickford Senior Living | Q4 2022 | 1 | ALF | 2,052 | 15,148 | 17,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,594 | $ | 27,906 | $ | 30,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83
In April 2022, we acquired a 53-unit ALF located in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, from Encore Senior Living. The acquisition price was $13.3 million and included the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable to us of $9.1 million, including interest. We have agreed to pay up to $0.8 million in additional cash consideration pending the results of an ongoing property tax appeal. As of December 31, 2022, no amount of this consideration is expected to be paid. We added the facility to an existing master lease for a term of 15 years at an initial lease rate of 7.25%, with an annual escalator of 2.5%.
In November 2022, we acquired a 60-unit ALF located in Virginia Beach, Virginia, from Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”). The acquisition price was $17.2 million, including $0.2 million in closing costs, and the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14.0 million including interest. The acquisition price also included a reduction of $3.0 million in Bickford’s outstanding pandemic-related rent deferrals that were recognized in rental income in the fourth quarter of 2022 based on the fair value of the real estate assets received. We added the facility to an existing master lease with Bickford for a term of 10.5 years at an initial rate of 8.0%, with annual CPI escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.
2021 Acquisitions and New Leases of Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we completed the following real estate acquisitions as described below ($ in thousands):
| Operator | Date | Properties | Asset Class | Land | Building and Improvements | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vizion Health | Q2 2021 | 1 | HOSP | $ | 1,470 | $ | 38,780 | $ | 40,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Navion Senior Solutions | Q2 2021 | 1 | SHO | 531 | 6,069 | 6,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,001 | $ | 44,849 | $ | 46,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vizion Health
In May 2021, we acquired a 64-bed specialty behavioral hospital located in Oklahoma for a total purchase price of $40.3 million, including $0.3 million in closing costs, and concurrently leased the hospital to an affiliate of Vizion Health. The 15-year master lease, which includes two five-year extension options, has an initial lease rate of 8.5% with fixed annual escalators of 2.5%. We have committed to additional funding of capital improvements for the hospital of up to $2.0 million which will be added to the lease base as funded. At December 31, 2022, no funds have been drawn.
Navion Senior Solutions
In June 2021, we acquired a 48-unit assisted living and memory care community in Tennessee for a purchase price of $6.6 million, including closing costs of $0.1 million. The community was added to an existing master lease with Navion Senior Solutions (“Navion”) whose term was reset for 12 years, has a lease rate of 7.5% with fixed annual escalators of 2.5% and offers two optional extensions of five years each.
2022 Asset Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we completed the following real estate property dispositions within our Real Estate Investments segment as described below ($ in thousands):
84
| Operator | Date | Properties | Asset Class | Net Proceeds | Net Real Estate Investment | Gain | Impairment1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hospital Corporation of America | Q1 2022 | 1 | MOB | $ | 4,868 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 2,964 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vitality Senior Living2 | Q1 2022 | 1 | SLC | 8,302 | 8,285 | 17 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holiday2 | Q2 2022 | 1 | ILF | 2,990 | 3,020 | — | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chancellor Senior Living2 | Q2 2022 | 2 | ALF | 7,305 | 7,357 | — | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bickford2 | Q2 2022 | 3 | ALF | 25,959 | 28,268 | — | 2,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comfort Care | Q2 2022 | 4 | ALF | 40,000 | 38,444 | 1,556 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Helix Healthcare | Q2 2022 | 1 | HOSP | 19,500 | 10,535 | 8,965 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discovery Senior Living2 | Q3 2022 | 2 | ALF/SLC | 16,379 | 15,159 | 1,220 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National HealthCare Corporation (“NHC”)3 | Q3 2022 | 7 | SNF | 43,686 | 30,066 | 13,620 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | $ | 168,989 | $ | 143,038 | $ | 28,342 | $ | 2,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Impairments are included in “Loan and realty losses” in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
2 Total impairment charges recognized on these properties were $28.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
3 See “Tenant Concentration” below for additional information on the NHC disposition.
Total rental income related to the disposed properties was $7.0 million, $10.9 million and $16.6 million for years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The disposal transactions for the three Bickford properties in the second quarter of 2022 included $2.4 million in contingent consideration representing cash placed in escrow that will be returned to the buyers to the extent the sold properties generate negative monthly cash flows over the twelve months following from the dates of sale. After the twelve-month period, any remaining funds not distributed will be paid to the Company. We have assessed that it is not probable that any of the escrowed funds would be received by the Company. To the extent this assessment changes, or funds are ultimately received, we will recognize the amount as a gain on the sale of real estate.
2021 Asset Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we completed the following real estate property dispositions within our Real Estate Investments reportable segments as described below ($ in thousands):
| Tenant | Date | Properties | Asset Class | Net Proceeds | Net Real Estate Investment | Other1 | Gain | Impairment2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bickford | Q2 2021 | 6 | SHO | $ | 39,924 | $ | 34,485 | $ | 1,871 | $ | 3,568 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Health Systems | Q2 2021 | 1 | MOB | 3,887 | 946 | 62 | 2,879 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TrustPoint Hospital | Q3 2021 | 1 | HOSP | 31,215 | 21,018 | 1,562 | 8,635 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Holiday | Q3 2021 | 8 | SHO | 114,133 | 113,611 | (1,360) | 1,882 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quorum Health | Q3 2021 | 1 | HOSP | 8,314 | 9,568 | — | — | 1,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Management | Q3 2021 | 1 | SHO | 12,847 | 3,212 | 210 | 9,425 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Holiday | Q3 2021 | 1 | SHO | 5,666 | 10,388 | (81) | — | 4,641 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brookdale Senior Living | Q4 2021 | 1 | ALF | 11,880 | 11,696 | — | 184 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Management | Q4 2021 | 1 | SLC | 7,275 | 3,335 | 256 | 3,684 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Genesis | Q4 2021 | 1 | SLC | 3,723 | 1,677 | (166) | 2,211 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | $ | 238,864 | $ | 209,936 | $ | 2,354 | $ | 32,468 | $ | 5,895 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Includes straight-line rent and deferred lease intangibles
2 Impairments are included in “Loan and realty losses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Bickford
During the second quarter of 2021, we sold to affiliates of Bickford a portfolio of six properties that were being leased to Bickford for a purchase price of $52.9 million. We received approximately $39.9 million in cash consideration upon sale and originated a second mortgage note receivable for the remaining purchase price of $13.0 million. A gain was not recognized
85
related to the $13.0 million second mortgage note receivable, which is discussed in more detail in Note 4. We recorded a gain upon completion of this transaction totaling approximately $3.6 million representing the excess of the $39.9 million cash consideration received over the net book value of the assets sold of $34.5 million and the write-off of straight-line rents receivable of approximately $1.9 million. Rental income from this portfolio was $1.6 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Upon completion of the sale, Bickford satisfied the terms of our prior agreement that contingently abated $2.1 million in rental income for the third quarter of 2020. Reference Note 9 for discussion of additional contingent consideration associated with this disposition that was not included in the transaction price at the time of closing.
Holiday
In August 2021, we sold a portfolio of eight properties that was leased to Holiday with an aggregate net book value of $113.6 million for total cash consideration of $115.0 million, and incurred transaction costs of $0.9 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $1.9 million associated with this transaction. Rental income was $5.9 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
In September 2021, we sold a property that was leased to Holiday located in Indiana with a net book value of $10.4 million for total cash consideration of $5.8 million, incurred transactions costs of $0.1 million, and recognized an impairment of approximately $4.6 million associated with this transaction. Rental income was $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Assets Held for Sale and Long-Lived Assets
The following is a summary of our assets held for sale ($ in thousands):
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Number of facilities | 13 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Real estate, net | $43,302 | $66,398 | ||||||||||||
Rental income associated with the assets held for sale as of December 31, 2022 totaled $2.1 million, $5.6 million, and $7.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Rental income associated with the assets held for sale as of December 31, 2021 totaled $5.4 million and $8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded impairments of approximately $51.6 million on 19 properties which were sold or classified as held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded impairments of approximately $51.8 million on ten properties which were sold or classified as held for sale related to our Real Estate Investments reportable segment.
Impairment charges are included in “Loan and realty losses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
We reduce the carrying value of impaired properties to their estimated fair value or, with respect to the properties classified as held for sale, to estimated fair value less costs to sell. To estimate the fair values of the properties, we utilized a market approach which considered binding agreements for sales (Level 1 inputs), non-binding offers to purchase from unrelated third parties and/or broker quotes of estimated values (Level 3 inputs), and/or independent third-party valuations (Level 1 and 3 inputs).
2023 Asset Acquisitions
In February 2023, we acquired two memory care communities operated by Silverado Senior Living for approximately $37.5 million. The newly developed properties that opened in 2022 and include a 60-unit community in Summerlin, Nevada and a 60-unit community in Frederick, Maryland and are leased pursuant to a 20-year lease master lease with a first-year lease rate of 7.5% and annual escalators of 2.0%.
86
In February 2023, we acquired a 60-unit assisted living and memory care community in Chesapeake, Virginia from Bickford. The acquisition price was $17.3 million, including approximately $0.1 million in closing costs, the satisfaction of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14.2 million including interest, and cash consideration of $0.5 million. The acquisition price also included a reduction of $2.5 million in Bickford’s outstanding pandemic-related deferrals. We added the community to an existing master lease with Bickford was added to an existing master lease with Bickford at an initial rate of 8.0%, with annual CPI escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.
Tenant Concentration
The following table contains information regarding tenant concentration in our Real Estate Investments portfolio, excluding $2.6 million for our corporate office, $338.1 million for the SHOP segment, and a credit loss reserve of $15.3 million, based on the percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 related to tenants or affiliates of tenants, that exceed 10% of total revenue ($ in thousands):
| As of December 31, 2022 | Revenues1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset | Gross Real | Notes | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class | Estate2 | Receivable | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | EFC | $ | 573,631 | $ | 48,547 | $ | 51,183 | 18% | $ | 50,726 | 17% | $ | 50,734 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| National HealthCare Corporation | SNF | 133,770 | — | 36,893 | 13% | 37,735 | 12% | 37,820 | 11% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bickford3 | ALF | 414,870 | 32,727 | N/A | N/A | 34,599 | 12% | 49,451 | 15% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holiday3 | ILF | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 40,705 | 12% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All others, net | Various | 1,329,461 | 167,205 | 144,534 | 52% | 164,017 | 55% | 144,448 | 44% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Escrow funds received from tenants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| for property operating expenses | Various | — | — | 9,788 | 4% | 11,638 | 4% | 9,653 | 3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,451,732 | $ | 248,479 | 242,398 | 298,715 | 332,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resident fees and services4 | 35,796 | 13% | — | —% | — | —% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 278,194 | $ | 298,715 | $ | 332,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Includes interest income on notes receivable and rental income from properties classified as held for sale.
2 Amounts include any properties classified as held for sale.
3 Revenues included in All others, net for years when less than 10%.
4 There is no tenant concentration in resident fees and services because these agreements are with individual residents.
At December 31, 2022, the two states in which we had an investment concentration of 10% or more were South Carolina (12.1%) and Texas (10.7%). At December 31, 2021, the two states in which we had an investment concentration of 10% or more were also South Carolina (11.6%) and Texas (10.3%).
Senior Living Communities
As of December 31, 2022, we leased ten retirement communities totaling 2,200 units to Senior Living Communities, LLC (“Senior Living”) pursuant to triple-net lease agreements maturing through December 2029. We recognized straight-line rent revenue of $0.4 million, $2.5 million and $4.3 million from the Senior Living lease for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
NHC
The facilities leased to NHC, a publicly held company, are under a master lease and consist of three independent living facilities and 32 skilled nursing facilities (four of which are subleased to other parties for whom the lease payments are guaranteed to us by NHC). Effective September 1, 2022, we amended the master lease dated October 17, 1991, concurrently with the sale of a portfolio of seven skilled nursing facilities to increase the annual base rent due each year through the expiration of the master lease on December 31, 2026. There are two additional five-year renewal options at a fair rental value as negotiated between the parties.
87
The annual base rent prior to the amendment was $30.8 million and was increased to $34.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, with credit given for rent paid in 2022 related to the sold portfolio. In addition to the base rent, NHC will continue to pay any additional rent and percentage rent as required by the master lease. Under the terms of the amended lease, the base annual rent escalates by 4% of the increase, if any, in each facility’s annual revenue over a 2007 base year. We refer to this additional rent component as “percentage rent.”
The following table summarizes the percentage rent income from NHC ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Current year | $ | 3,332 | $ | 3,536 | $ | 3,687 | |||||||||||
Prior year final certification1 | (206) | (5) | (14) | ||||||||||||||
| Total percentage rent income | $ | 3,126 | $ | 3,531 | $ | 3,673 | |||||||||||
1 For purposes of the percentage rent calculation described in the master lease agreement, NHC’s annual revenue by facility for a given year is certified to NHI by March 31st of the following year.
Two of our board members, including our chairman, are also members of NHC’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2022, NHC owned 1,630,642 shares of our common stock.
Other Operators
Bickford
As of December 31, 2022, we leased 36 facilities, excluding three facilities classified as assets held for sale, under four leases to Bickford. Revenues from Bickford reflect the impact of pandemic-related rent concessions accounted for as variable lease payments of approximately $5.5 million, $18.3 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we wrote off approximately $18.1 million of straight-line rents receivable and $7.1 million of lease incentives, which were included in “Other assets, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, against rental income upon converting Bickford to the cash basis of accounting. These write-offs were the result of a change in our evaluation of collectability of future rent payments due under its four master lease agreements based upon information we obtained from Bickford in the second quarter of 2022 regarding its financial condition that raised substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Cash rent received from Bickford for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $27.6 million, which excludes $3.0 million of rental income related to the reduction of pandemic-related rent deferrals in connection with the acquisition of the ALF located in Virginia Beach, Virginia discussed above. Straight-line rent revenue of $1.7 million and $2.8 million was recognized from the Bickford leases for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Other than the asset acquisition and the three properties sold discussed above, we completed various restructuring activities in the Bickford leased property portfolio during the first half of 2022. In March 2022, we transferred one ALF located in Pennsylvania from the Bickford portfolio to a new operator that is leased pursuant to a ten-year triple-net lease and wrote off approximately $0.7 million in a straight-line rent receivable, reducing rental income. Effective April 1, 2022, we restructured and amended three of Bickford’s master lease agreements covering 28 properties and reached agreement on the repayment terms of its outstanding pandemic-related deferrals. Significant terms of these agreements are as follows:
• Extended the maturity dates of the modified leases to 2033 and 2035. The remaining master lease agreement covering 11 properties with an original maturity in 2023 was previously extended to 2028.
• Reduced the combined rent for the portfolio to approximately $28.3 million (excluding the ALF in Virginia Beach acquired in the fourth quarter of 2022) per year through April 1, 2024, subject to a nominal annual increase, at which time the rent will be reset to a fair market value, but not less than 8.0% of our initial gross investment.
• Required monthly payments beginning October 2022 through December 2024 based on a percentage of Bickford’s monthly revenues exceeding an established threshold to be applied to the outstanding pandemic-related deferrals granted to Bickford. The deferrals may be reduced by up to $6.0 million upon Bickford achieving certain performance targets and the sale or transition of certain properties to new operators of which $3.0 million was earned in the fourth quarter of 2022.
88
Holiday
During the third quarter of 2021, Welltower Inc. (“Welltower”) completed an acquisition that resulted in a Welltower-controlled subsidiary becoming a tenant under our master lease for the NHI-owned Holiday real estate assets. We placed the tenant on the cash basis of accounting effective in the third quarter of 2021 because of non-payment of rent and completed the transitioning of the remaining properties in this portfolio effective April 1, 2022. Reference Note 9 for more discussion.
Other Portfolio Activity
Cash Basis Operators and Straight-line Rents Receivable Write-offs
We placed three operators on the cash basis of accounting for their leases during 2022, including Bickford discussed above. During 2021, the Welltower-controlled tenant of our Holiday portfolio was the only tenant on the cash basis. Rental income associated with these tenants totaled $21.4 million, $68.8 million and $104.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which includes the impact of write-offs of $26.0 million in total straight-line rents receivable and $7.1 million of lease incentives during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Tenant Purchase Options
Certain of our leases contain purchase options allowing tenants to acquire the leased properties. At December 31, 2022, we had tenant purchase options on three properties with an aggregate net investment of $59.6 million that will become exercisable between 2027 and 2028. Rental income from these properties with tenant purchase options was $7.0 million and $6.9 million and $6.5 million for years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We cannot reasonably estimate at this time the probability that any purchase options will be exercised in the future. Consideration to be received from the exercise of any tenant purchase option is expected to exceed our net investment in the leased property or properties.
Future Minimum Lease Payments
Future minimum lease payments to be received by us under our operating leases, including cash basis tenants, at December 31, 2022 are as follows ($ in thousands):
| Year Ending December 31, | Amount | ||||
| 2023 | $ | 218,112 | |||
| 2024 | 227,086 | ||||
| 2025 | 231,745 | ||||
| 2026 | 236,157 | ||||
| 2027 | 197,793 | ||||
| Thereafter | 796,452 | ||||
| $ | 1,907,345 | ||||
Variable Lease Payments
Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. Some of our leases contain escalators that are determined annually based on a variable index or other factors that is indeterminable at the inception of the lease. The table below indicates the revenue recognized as a result of fixed and variable lease escalators ($ in thousands):
89
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Lease payments based on fixed escalators, net of deferrals | $ | 226,873 | $ | 241,172 | $ | 272,630 | |||||||||||
| Lease payments based on variable escalators | 5,275 | 4,662 | 5,501 | ||||||||||||||
| Straight-line rent income, net of write-offs | (16,681) | 14,603 | 20,411 | ||||||||||||||
| Escrow funds received from tenants for property operating expenses | 9,788 | 11,638 | 9,653 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization and write-off of lease incentives | (7,555) | (1,026) | (987) | ||||||||||||||
| Rental income | $ | 217,700 | $ | 271,049 | $ | 307,208 | |||||||||||
Note 4. Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
At December 31, 2022, our investments in mortgage notes receivable totaling $164.6 million secured by real estate and other assets of the borrower (e.g., UCC liens on personal property) related to 17 facilities and other notes receivable totaled $83.9 million, substantially all of which are guaranteed by significant parties to the notes or by cross-collateralization of properties with the same owner. At December 31, 2021, our investments in mortgage notes receivable totaled $230.9 million and other notes receivable totaled $74.2 million. These balances exclude a credit loss reserve of $15.3 million and $5.2 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
During the fourth quarter of 2022, we designated a mortgage note receivable of $10.0 million and a mezzanine loan of $14.5 million with affiliates of one operator/borrower as non-performing. This operator/borrower is also one of the tenants converted to cash basis of accounting for its master leases discussed in Note 3. Interest income recognized, representing cash received, from these non-performing loans was $1.4 million, $1.9 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. All other loans were on accrual status as of December 31, 2022. All of our notes were on full accrual status at December 31, 2021.
2022 Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
Encore Senior Living
In January 2022, we entered into an agreement to fund a $28.5 million development loan with Encore Senior Living to construct a 108-unit assisted living and memory care community in Fitchburg, Wisconsin. The four-year loan agreement has an annual interest rate of 8.5% and two one-year extensions. We have a purchase option on the property once it has stabilized. The total amount funded on the note was $14.2 million as of December 31, 2022.
Capital Funding Group
In November 2022, we funded a $42.5 million senior loan to refinance a portfolio of five skilled nursing facilities located in Texas. The loan was made to affiliates of Capital Funding Group and the properties are leased by subsidiaries of The Ensign Group. The five-year loan agreement has an annual interest rate of 7.25% and two one-year extensions.
Montecito Medical Real Estate
We have a $50.0 million mezzanine loan and security agreement with Montecito Medical Real Estate for a fund that invests in medical real estate, including medical office buildings, throughout the United States. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we funded $8.2 million on three real estate investments. As of December 31, 2022, we have funded $20.3 million of our commitment that was used to acquire nine medical office buildings for a combined purchase price of approximately $86.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we received interest of $1.8 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we received principal of $0.3 million.
The loan agreement was modified in April 2022 for two subsequent real estate investments to accrue interest at an annual rate of 7.5% paid monthly in arrears and 4.5% per year in interest to be paid upon certain future events including repayments, sales of fund investments, and refinancings (the “Deferred Interest”). Prior borrowings under the loan agreement bear interest at an annual rate of 9.5% and accrue an additional 2.5% in Deferred Interest. Funds drawn in accordance with this agreement are required to be repaid on a per-investment basis five years from deployment of the funds for the applicable investment and includes two one-year extensions.
90
2021 Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
Montecito Medical Real Estate
In April 2021, the Company entered into the $50.0 million mezzanine loan and security agreement with Montecito Medical Real Estate discussed above.
Vizion Health - Brookhaven
In May 2021, we provided a $20.0 million, five year loan to Vizion Health-Brookhaven, LLC to finance the acquisition of healthcare operations, including the real and personal property of a behavioral hospital we acquired as discussed in Note 3. The loan requires monthly principal and interest payments and bears an initial annual interest rate of 8.5% with fixed annual escalators of 2.5% that began June 1, 2022. Initial principal loan repayments are equal to 90% of the excess cash flow with a monthly minimum as defined in the agreement. Principal repayments are reduced to 50% of the excess cash flow once the outstanding loan balance is reduced below $15.0 million. The loan balance as of December 31, 2022 was $18.8 million.
Navion Senior Solutions
In May 2021, we provided a ten-year corporate loan to Navion for $3.6 million. The loan requires interest-only payments at an annual interest rate of 8% until June 1, 2024, and gives us first option to provide permanent development financing for a future project.
Bickford
As part of the sale of six properties to Bickford in the second quarter of 2021 discussed in Note 3, we executed a $13.0 million second mortgage as a component of the purchase price consideration. The loan is secured by a security interest in the portfolio that is subordinate only to the first mortgage on the portfolio held by a third party. This second mortgage note receivable bears interest at a 10% annual rate and matures in April 2026. Interest income was $1.3 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Given the size of the Company financing provided relative to the purchase price, its subordination to the first mortgage outstanding and the ongoing negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing cost on Bickford’s operating results, we did not include this note receivable in the determination of the gain to be recognized upon sale of the portfolio in accordance with the provisions of ASC 610-20, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. Therefore, this note receivable is not reflected in “Mortgage and other notes receivable, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 or 2021. We will re-evaluate the collectability of this note receivable each reporting period and recognize the note receivable and related deferred gain at such time the note receivable is considered probable of collection in accordance with ASC 610-20.
Other Activity
Bickford Senior Living
As of December 31, 2022, we had two fully funded construction loans to Bickford totaling $28.9 million. The construction loans are secured by first mortgage liens on substantially all real and personal property as well as a pledge of any and all leases or agreements which may grant a right of use to the property. Usual and customary covenants extend to the agreements, including the borrower’s obligation for payment of insurance and taxes. NHI has a fair market value purchase option on the properties at stabilization of the underlying operations. On these development projects, Bickford, as borrower, is entitled to up to $2.0 million per project in incentives based on the achievement of predetermined operational milestones and, if funded, will increase NHI's future purchase price and eventual NHI lease payment.
Life Care Services - Sagewood
In December 2018, we entered into an agreement to lend LCS-Westminster Partnership IV LLP (“LCS-WP IV”), an affiliate of LCS, the manager of the facility, up to $180.0 million. The loan took the form of two notes under a master credit agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2021, LCS-WP IV repaid the fully drawn Note B principal balance of $61.2 million. As a result, we recognized the remaining Note B commitment fee of $0.4 million in “Interest income and other” during the year ended December 31, 2021.
91
In the second quarter of 2022, we received repayment of a $111.3 million mortgage note receivable along with all accrued interest and a prepayment fee of $1.1 million which is reflected in “Gain on note receivable payoff” on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022. Interest income was $5.2 million, $10.2 million and $11.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Senior Living Communities
We provided a $20.0 million revolving line of credit whose borrowings are to be used primarily to finance construction projects within the Senior Living portfolio, including building additional units, and general working capital needs. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the revolving line of credit was amended to reset the interest rate to 8.0% per annum effective in November 2022, and reduce the availability to $15.0 million on January 1, 2025. The revolver matures in December 2029 at the time of lease maturity. The outstanding balance under the facility at December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $15.8 million and $9.6 million, respectively.
In June 2019, we provided a mortgage loan of $32.7 million to Senior Living for the acquisition of a 248-unit continuing care retirement community in Columbia, South Carolina. The financing is for a term of five years with two one-year extensions and carries an interest rate of 7.25%. Additionally, the loan conveys to NHI a purchase option at a stated minimum price of $38.3 million, subject to adjustment for market conditions.
Credit Loss Reserve
Our principal measures of credit quality, except for construction mortgages, are debt service coverage for amortizing loans and interest or fixed charge coverage for non-amortizing loans, collectively referred to as “Coverage”. A Coverage ratio provides a measure of the borrower’s ability to make scheduled principal and interest payments. The Coverage ratios presented in the following table have been calculated utilizing the most recent date for which data is available, September 30, 2022, using EBITDARM (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees) and the requisite debt service, interest service or fixed charges, as defined in the applicable loan agreement. We categorize Coverage into three levels: (i) more than 1.5x, (ii) between 1.0x and 1.5x, and (iii) less than 1.0x. We update the calculation of Coverage on a quarterly basis. Coverage is not a meaningful credit quality indicator for construction mortgages as either these developments are not generating any operating income, or they have insufficient operating income as occupancy levels necessary to stabilize the properties have not yet been achieved. We measure credit quality for these mortgages by considering the construction and stabilization timeline and the financial condition of the borrower as well as economic and market conditions. The tables below present outstanding note balances as of December 31, 2022 at amortized cost.
We consider the guidance in ASC 310-20 when determining whether a modification, extension or renewal constitutes a current period origination. The credit quality indicator as of December 31, 2022, is presented below for the amortized cost, net by year of origination of ($ in thousands):
92
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | Prior | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Mortgages | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| more than 1.5x | $ | 14,033 | $ | — | $ | 36,524 | $ | 32,700 | $ | — | $ | 4,028 | $ | 87,285 | |||||||||
| between 1.0x and 1.5x | — | — | — | — | 14,700 | — | 14,700 | ||||||||||||||||
| less than 1.0x | 42,294 | — | 3,874 | 6,423 | — | — | 52,591 | ||||||||||||||||
| 56,327 | — | 40,398 | 39,123 | 14,700 | 4,028 | 154,576 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mezzanine | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| more than 1.5x | — | 18,776 | — | — | — | — | 18,776 | ||||||||||||||||
| between 1.0x and 1.5x | — | 23,969 | — | — | — | 8,835 | 32,804 | ||||||||||||||||
| — | 42,745 | — | — | — | 8,835 | 51,580 | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-performing | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| less than 1.0x | — | — | — | — | — | 24,500 | 24,500 | ||||||||||||||||
| — | — | — | — | — | 24,500 | 24,500 | |||||||||||||||||
| Revolver | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| more than 1.5x | 1,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| between 1.0x and 1.5x | 15,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17,823 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit loss reserve | (15,338) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 233,141 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Due to the continuing challenges in financial markets, due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the potential impact on the collectability of our mortgages and other notes receivable, we forecasted a 20% increase in the probability of a default and a 20% increase in the amount of loss from a default on all loans, other than those designated as non-performing, resulting in an effective adjustment of 44%. The methodology for estimating the reserves for non-performing loans incorporates current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions of these loans, including qualitative factors, which may differ from conditions existing in the historical period.
The allowance for expected credit losses is presented in the following table for the year ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| Balance at January 1, 2022 | $ | 5,210 | |||
| Provision for expected credit losses | 10,628 | ||||
| Write-off | (500) | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 15,338 | |||
Note 5. Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Formation Activities
Concurrently with the settlement of the outstanding litigation with Welltower discussed more fully in Note 9, we terminated the master lease with a Welltower-controlled subsidiary for the legacy Holiday properties effective April 1, 2022 and transitioned the operations of 15 ILFs from the Welltower-controlled tenant into two new ventures. These new ventures, consolidated by the Company, are structured to comply with REIT requirements and utilize the TRS for activities that would otherwise be non-qualifying for REIT purposes. The properties in each venture are operated by a property manager in exchange for a management fee. The equity structure of these ventures is comprised of 65% and 35% preferred and common equity interests, respectively. The Company owns 100% of the preferred equity interests in these ventures and an aggregate blended common equity interest of 89%. As of December 31, 2022, the annual fixed preferred return was approximately $10.2 million. Additionally, the managers, or related parties of the managers, own common equity interests in their respective ventures. Each venture is discussed in more detail below.
Merrill Gardens Managed Portfolio
We transferred six ILFs located in California and Washington into a consolidated venture with Merrill. Merrill contributed $10.6 million in cash for its common equity interest in the venture. The operating agreement includes additional contingent distributions to the partners based on the attainment of certain yields on investment calculated on an annual basis.
93
The properties are managed by Merrill pursuant to a management agreement with an initial term through March 2032 that automatically renews on a year-to-year basis thereafter unless terminated by either party with notice. The management agreement entitles Merrill to a base management fee of 5% of net revenue and a real estate services fee of 5% of real estate costs incurred during any calendar year that exceed $1,000 times the number of units at each facility. Given certain provisions of the operating agreement, including provisions related to a Company change in control, the noncontrolling interest associated with the venture was determined to be contingently redeemable, as discussed further in Note 10.
Discovery Managed Portfolio
We transferred nine ILFs located in Arkansas, Georgia, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Jersey, and South Carolina into a consolidated venture with DSHI NHI Holiday LLC (the “Discovery member”), a related party of Discovery. The Discovery member contributed $1.1 million in cash for its common equity interest in the venture. The operating agreement includes additional contingent distributions to the partners based on the attainment of certain yields on investment calculated on an annual basis. At inception, the noncontrolling interest associated with this venture was determined to be contingently redeemable and classified as a redeemable noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2022, the operating agreement was amended, resulting in the noncontrolling interest no longer being contingently redeemable. The noncontrolling interest has been reclassified to “Equity” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022.
The properties are managed by separate related parties of Discovery pursuant to management agreements with an initial term through March 2032 that automatically renews on a year-to-year basis thereafter unless terminated by either party with notice. The management agreements entitle the managers to a base management fee of 5% of net revenue.
Note 6. Equity Method Investment
Our initial $0.9 million investment in the operating company, Timber Ridge OpCo, LLC (“Timber Ridge OpCo”) held by our TRS arose in conjunction with the acquisition of a CCRC from LCS-Westminster Partnership III, LLP in January 2020. We structured our arrangement with our JV partner, LCS Timber Ridge LLC, to be compliant with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007. Accordingly, the TRS holds our 25% equity interest in Timber Ridge OpCo, which permits the TRS to engage in activities and share in cash flows that would otherwise be non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income test. As part of our investment, we provided Timber Ridge OpCo a revolving credit facility of up to $5.0 million of which no funds have been drawn.
We account for our investment in Timber Ridge OpCo under the equity method and decrease the carrying value of our investment for losses in the entity and distributions to NHI for cumulative amounts up to and including our basis plus any commitments to fund operations. Our commitments are currently limited to the additional $5.0 million under the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2022, we have recognized our share of Timber Ridge OpCo’s operating losses in excess of our initial investment. These cumulative losses of $5.0 million in excess of our original basis are included in “Accounts payable and accrued expenses” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. Excess unrecognized equity method losses, including cash distributions received, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $4.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Cumulative unrecognized losses, including cash distributions received, were $5.9 million through December 31, 2022. We recognized gains of approximately $0.6 million, representing cash distributions received for the year ended December 31, 2022, and losses of approximately $1.5 million and $3.1 million related to our investment in Timber Ridge OpCo for year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Timber Ridge property is subject to early resident mortgages secured by a Deed of Trust and Indenture of Trust (the “Deed and Indenture”). As part of our acquisition, NHI-LCS JV I, LLC (“Timber Ridge PropCo”) acquired the Timber Ridge property and a subordination agreement was entered into pursuant to which the trustee acknowledged and confirmed that the security interests created under the Deed and Indenture were subordinate to any security interests granted in connection with the loan made by NHI to Timber Ridge PropCo. In addition, by terms of the resident loan assumption agreement, during the term of the lease (seven years with two renewal options), Timber Ridge OpCo is to indemnify Timber Ridge PropCo for any repayment by Timber Ridge PropCo of these liabilities under the guarantee. As a result of the subordination and resident loan assumption agreements, no liability has been recorded as of December 31, 2022. The balance secured by the Deed and Indenture was $13.6 million at December 31, 2022.
Note 7. Other Assets
94
Other assets, net consist of the following ($ in thousands):
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
SHOP accounts receivable and prepaid expenses, net of allowance of $375 and $— | $ | 1,341 | $ | — | |||||||
| Real estate investments accounts receivable and prepaid expenses | 3,621 | 3,210 | |||||||||
| Lease incentive payments, net | 3,190 | 9,545 | |||||||||
| Regulatory escrows | 6,208 | 6,208 | |||||||||
| Restricted cash | 2,225 | 2,073 | |||||||||
| $ | 16,585 | $ | 21,036 | ||||||||
Note 8. Debt
Debt consists of the following ($ in thousands):
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Revolving credit facility - unsecured | $ | 42,000 | $ | — | |||||||
| Bank term loans - unsecured | 240,000 | 375,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes - unsecured, net of discount of $2,600 and $2,921 | 397,400 | 397,079 | |||||||||
| Private placement notes - unsecured | 400,000 | 400,000 | |||||||||
| Fannie Mae term loans - secured, non-recourse | 76,649 | 77,038 | |||||||||
| Unamortized loan costs | (8,538) | (6,234) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,147,511 | $ | 1,242,883 | ||||||||
Aggregate principal maturities of debt as of December 31, 2022 for each of the next five years and thereafter are included in
the table below. These maturities do not include the impact of any debt incurred or repaid subsequent to December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| For The Year Ending December 31, | Amount | ||||
| 2023 | $ | 415,408 | |||
| 2024 | 75,425 | ||||
| 2025 | 125,816 | ||||
| 2026 | 42,000 | ||||
| 2027 | 100,000 | ||||
| Thereafter | 400,000 | ||||
| 1,158,649 | |||||
| Less: discount | (2,600) | ||||
| Less: unamortized loan costs | (8,538) | ||||
| $ | 1,147,511 | ||||
Unsecured revolving credit facility and bank term loans
On March 31, 2022, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “2022 Credit Agreement”) providing us with a $700.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, replacing our previous $550.0 million unsecured revolver. The 2022 Credit Agreement matures in March 2026, but may be extended at our option, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for two additional six-month periods. Borrowings under the 2022 Credit Agreement bear interest, at our election, at one of the following (i) Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) (plus a credit spread adjustment) plus a margin ranging from 0.725% to 1.40%, (ii) Daily SOFR (plus a credit spread adjustment) plus a margin ranging from 0.725% to 1.40% or (iii) the base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.40%. In each election, the actual margin is determined according to our credit ratings. The “base rate” means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the Agent’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate on such day plus 0.50% or (iii) the adjusted Term SOFR for a one-month tenor in effect on such day plus 1.0%.
95
In addition, the 2022 Credit Agreement requires a facility fee equal to 0.125% to 0.30%, based on our rating. We incurred $4.5 million of deferred financing costs in connection with the 2022 Credit Agreement which are included as a component of “Debt” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022.
Concurrently with the execution of the 2022 Credit Agreement, we amended our $300.0 million term loan, maturing in September 2023 (“2023 Term Loan”). The amendment modifies the existing covenants to align with provisions in the 2022 Credit Agreement and to accrue interest on borrowings based on SOFR (plus a credit spread adjustment) that were previously based on LIBOR, with no change to the existing applicable interest rate margins. We may also elect for the 2023 Term Loan to accrue interest at a base rate plus the applicable margin. As of December 31, 2022, we repaid $60.0 million of the 2023 Term Loan.
In March 2022, we repaid a $75.0 million term loan with a maturity in August 2022 with proceeds from the revolving credit facility. The term loan bore interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 135 basis points (“bps”), based on our current ratings. Upon repayment, we expensed approximately $0.2 million of unamortized loan costs associated with this loan which is included in “Loss on early retirement of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
In January 2021, we repaid a $100.0 million term loan that originated in July 2020 with the net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering discussed below. The term loan bore interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR (with a 50 basis point floor) plus 185 basis points (“bps”), based on our current leverage ratios. Upon repayment, the Company expensed approximately $1.9 million of deferred financing costs associated with this loan which is included in “Loss on early retirement of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The revolving facility fee was 25 bps per annum, and based on our current credit ratings, the facility presently provides for floating interest on the revolving credit facility and the 2023 Term Loan at SOFR CME Term Option one-month loan (plus a 10 bps spread adjustment) plus 105 bps and a blended 125 bps, respectively. At December 31, 2022, the SOFR CME Term Option one-month was 436 bps. At December 31, 2021, 30-day LIBOR was 10 bps, respectively.
At December 31, 2022, we had $658.0 million available to draw on the revolving portion of our credit facility, subject to usual and customary covenants. Among other stipulations, the unsecured credit facility agreement requires that we maintain certain financial ratios within limits set by our creditors. At December 31, 2022, we were in compliance with these ratios.
Pinnacle Bank is a participating member of our banking group. A member of NHI’s Board of Directors and chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is also the chairman of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., the holding company for Pinnacle Bank. NHI’s local banking transactions are conducted primarily through Pinnacle Bank.
2031 Senior Notes
In January 2021, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes that mature on February 1, 2031 and pay interest semi-annually (the “2031 Senior Notes”). The 2031 Senior Notes were sold at an issue price of 99.196% of face value before the underwriters’ discount. Our net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses, were approximately $392.3 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering to repay a $100.0 million term loan and recognized a loss on early retirement of debt of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, representing the unamortized loan costs expensed upon early repayment of the term loan.
The 2031 Senior Notes are subject to affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants. As of December 31, 2022 we were in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants for our 2031 Senior Notes borrowings.
Private Placement Notes
Our unsecured private placement notes, payable interest-only, are summarized below ($ in thousands):
96
| Amount | Inception | Maturity | Fixed Rate | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 125,000 | January 2015 | January 2023 | 3.99 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 50,000 | November 2015 | November 2023 | 3.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 75,000 | September 2016 | September 2024 | 3.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 50,000 | November 2015 | November 2025 | 4.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 100,000 | January 2015 | January 2027 | 4.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
In January 2023, we repaid the $125.0 million of the private placement notes due January 2023 primarily with proceeds from the revolving credit facility.
Covenants pertaining to the private placement notes are generally conformed with those governing our credit facility, except for specific debt-coverage ratios that are more restrictive. Our unsecured private placement notes include a rate increase provision that is effective if any rating agency lowers our credit rating on our senior unsecured debt below investment grade and our compliance leverage increases to 50% or more.
Fannie Mae Term Loans
As of December 31, 2022, we had $60.1 million Fannie Mae term-debt financing, originating March 2015, consisting of interest-only payments at an annual rate of 3.79% and a 10-year maturity. In December 2021, we repaid two Fannie Mae term loans with a combined balance of $17.9 million, plus accrued interest of $0.1 million. The payoff included a prepayment fee of $1.5 million, which is reflected in the line item “Loss on early retirement of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2021. The remaining mortgage loans are non-recourse and secured by eleven properties leased to Bickford.
In a December 2017 acquisition, we assumed additional Fannie Mae debt that amortizes through 2025 when a balloon payment will be due, is subject to prepayment penalties until 2024, bears interest at a nominal rate of 4.6% per annum, and has a remaining balance of $16.5 million at December 31, 2022. Collectively, these notes are secured by facilities having a net book value of $104.3 million at December 31, 2022.
Repayment of HUD mortgage loans
In the fourth quarter of 2020, we repaid ten HUD mortgage loans with a combined balance of $42.6 million, plus accrued interest of $0.2 million. The payoff included a prepayment fee of $1.6 million and the recognition of the unamortized discount and deferred financing cost of $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, which are reflected in the line item “Loss on early retirement of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Convertible senior notes
On April 1, 2021, our 3.25% senior unsecured convertible notes (the “Convertible Notes”) issued March 2014 matured. The Company paid $67.1 million, including accrued interest of $1.0 million and a $6.1 million conversion premium, to retire the Convertible Notes. The conversion premium was recorded as a reduction of “Capital in excess of par value” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021.
Interest Expense and Rate Swap Agreements
On December 31, 2021, our remaining $400.0 million interest rate swap agreements in place to hedge against fluctuations in variable interest rates applicable to our bank loans matured. The matured swaps had an average interest rate of 1.92% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The following table summarizes interest expense ($ in thousands):
97
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest expense on debt at contractual rates | $ | 42,487 | $ | 40,866 | $ | 43,458 | |||||||||||
| Losses reclassified from accumulated other | |||||||||||||||||
| comprehensive income into interest expense | — | 7,286 | 6,330 | ||||||||||||||
| Capitalized interest | (46) | (40) | (254) | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt issuance costs, debt discount and other | 2,476 | 2,698 | 3,348 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | $ | 44,917 | $ | 50,810 | $ | 52,882 | |||||||||||
Note 9. Commitments, Contingencies and Uncertainties
In the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of commitments, typically consisting of funding of revolving credit arrangements, construction and mezzanine loans to our operators to conduct expansions and acquisitions for their own account classified below as loan commitments, and commitments for the funding of construction for expansion or renovation to our existing properties under lease classified below as development commitments. In our leasing operations, we offer to our tenants and to sellers of newly acquired properties a variety of inducements which originate contractually as contingencies but which may become commitments upon the satisfaction of the contingent event. Contingent payments earned will be included in the respective lease bases when funded. The tables below summarize our existing, known commitments and contingencies as of December 31, 2022 according to the nature of their impact on our leasehold or loan portfolios ($ in thousands):
| Asset Class | Type | Total | Funded | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan Commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bickford Senior Living | SHO | Construction | $ | 28,900 | $ | (28,853) | $ | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Encore Senior Living | SHO | Construction | 50,725 | (36,375) | 14,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | SHO | Revolving Credit | 20,000 | (15,847) | 4,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Timber Ridge OpCo | SHO | Working Capital | 5,000 | — | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watermark Retirement | SHO | Working Capital | 5,000 | (1,976) | 3,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montecito Medical Real Estate | MOB | Mezzanine Loan | 50,000 | (20,255) | 29,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 159,625 | $ | (103,306) | $ | 56,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes 4 and 5 to our consolidated financial statements for further details of our loan commitments. Loans funded do not include the effects of discounts or commitment fees.
The credit loss liability for unfunded loan commitments is estimated using the same methodology as for our funded mortgage and other notes receivable based on the estimated amount that we expect to fund. We applied the same economic uncertainty adjustments as discussed in Note 4.
The liability for expected credit losses on our unfunded loans reflected in “Accounts payable and accrued expense” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 is presented in the following table for the year ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | 955 | |||
| Provision for expected credit losses | (272) | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | 683 | |||
98
| Asset Class | Type | Total | Funded | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Woodland Village | SHO | Construction | $ | 7,515 | $ | (7,425) | $ | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Communities | SHO | Renovation | 9,930 | (9,930) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watermark Retirement | SHO | Renovation | 6,500 | (5,959) | 541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Navion Senior Solutions | SHO | Renovation | 3,500 | (1,062) | 2,438 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | SHO | Various | 4,550 | (1,300) | 3,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SHOP | ILF | Renovation | 1,500 | — | 1,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 33,495 | $ | (25,676) | $ | 7,819 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition to these commitments listed above, we have agreed to pay up to $0.8 million in additional cash consideration pending the results of an ongoing property tax appeal related to a property acquired in the second quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2022, no amount of this consideration is expected to be paid. Discovery PropCo has committed to fund up to $2.0 million toward the purchase of condominium units located at one of the facilities of which $1.0 million had been funded as of December 31, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, we had the following contingent lease inducement commitments which are generally based on the performance of facility operations and may or may not be met by the tenant ($ in thousands):
| Asset Class | Total | Funded | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contingencies (Lease Inducements): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Timber Ridge OpCo | SHO | $ | 10,000 | $ | — | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| IntegraCare | SHO | 750 | — | 750 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wingate Healthcare | SHO | 5,000 | — | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Navion Senior Solutions | SHO | 4,850 | (2,700) | 2,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Discovery Senior Living | SHO | 4,000 | — | 4,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ignite Medical Resorts | SNF | 2,000 | — | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sante Partners | SHO | 2,000 | — | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 28,600 | $ | (2,700) | $ | 25,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
In February 2023, Timber Ridge OpCo formally requested payout of its $10.0 million lease inducement based upon the achievement of all performance conditions.
Bickford Contingent Note Arrangement
Related to the sale of six properties to Bickford in 2021 discussed further in Note 3, we reached an agreement with Bickford whereby Bickford would owe us up to $4.5 million under a contingent note arrangement. We have the one-time option to determine fair market value of the portfolio between May 1, 2023 and April 30, 2026, at which time the amount owed under the contingent note arrangement, if any, will be determined as the lesser of (i) the difference between the fair market value of the portfolio and $52.1 million, which amount represents the purchase consideration for the portfolio of $52.9 million less $0.8 million in mortgage debt repayment fees previously paid by us associated with this portfolio, and (ii) $4.5 million. Any amount due on the contingent note arrangement will accrue interest at an annual rate of 10% and will be due in five years from the determination date.
COVID-19 Pandemic Contingencies
The COVID-19 pandemic has had and may continue to have an impact on the operations of many of our tenants, managers and borrowers.
Throughout the pandemic to date, we have granted various rent concessions to tenants whose operations have been adversely affected by the pandemic. When applicable, we have elected not to apply the modification guidance under ASC 842 and have decided to account for the related concessions as variable lease payments, recorded as rental income when received.
As of December 31, 2022, aggregate pandemic-related rent concessions granted to tenants that have been accounted for as variable lease payments totaled approximately $44.3 million, of which $3.7 million were rent abatements. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we granted pandemic-related rent deferrals of $9.3 million to seven tenants, of which Bickford accounted for approximately $4.0 million. Repayments and other reductions of rent deferrals recognized in “Rental Income”
99
during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $3.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Additionally, $4.1 million of pandemic-related rent deferrals were forgiven during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Rent deferrals accounted for as variable lease payments granted for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 totaled approximately $26.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, of which Bickford accounted for approximately $18.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
Litigation
Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our managers, tenants and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. In addition, such claims may include, among other things professional liability and general liability claims, as well as regulatory proceedings related to our SHOP segment. While there may be lawsuits pending against us and certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no direct material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Welltower Inc.
In June 2021, Welltower announced that it would acquire certain assets from the senior housing portfolio of Holiday, a privately held senior living management company, that included 17 senior living facilities governed by a master lease originally executed between a Holiday subsidiary and NHI in 2013. We received no rent due under the master lease from the tenant for these facilities after this change in tenant ownership occurred in late July 2021.
On December 20, 2021, NHI and its subsidiaries NHI-REIT of Next House, LLC, Myrtle Beach Retirement Resident LLC, and Voorhees Retirement Residence LLC filed suit against Welltower, Inc., Welltower Victory II TRS LLC, and Well Churchill Leasehold Owner LLC (collectively the “Defendants”) in the Delaware Court of Chancery (Case No. 2021-1097-MTZ). In the litigation, we contended that the Defendants repeatedly failed to honor their legal obligations to NHI. In particular, we asserted that the Defendants acquired assets from a third party, Holiday, that included leases to NHI senior living facilities and fraudulently induced NHI to consent to the assignment of the leases, and then immediately failed to pay rent or provide a promised security agreement that was intended to secure against their default, all as part of an effort to pressure NHI to agree to new conditions outside the assignment agreement or force a sale of the properties to the Defendants. The lawsuit further asserted that the Defendants owed unpaid contractual rent.
In connection with a memorandum of understanding between the parties dated March 4, 2022, NHI applied the remaining approximately $8.8 million lease deposit to past due rents in the first quarter of 2022. Also, as provided by the memorandum of understanding, Welltower transferred approximately $6.9 million to an escrow account to be released upon satisfactory transition of the facility operations and mutual dismissal of the lawsuit. NHI and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a settlement agreement dated March 31, 2022 with Defendants formalizing the terms to settle the lawsuit.
NHI and certain of its subsidiaries terminated the master lease with Well Churchill Leasehold Owner, LLC as successor in interest to NHI Master Tenant LLC, effective April 1, 2022, upon completion of the transition of the properties subject to the master lease, as follows: (i) one property was sold to a third party, (ii) one property was transitioned to an existing operator relationship and leased pursuant to an existing master lease, and (iii) the remaining 15 properties were transitioned into two new SHOP partnership ventures. See Note 5 for more information on these new ventures.
Also effective April 1, 2022, the parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit and mutually release all claims related to or arising out of the litigation and the $6.9 million in escrowed funds were released to NHI and recognized as rental income during the year ended December 31, 2022. We recognized approximately $0.7 million as a “Loss on operations transfer, net” on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2022. This net loss represents the amount of net working capital deficit assumed by NHI in connection with the transfer of operations following the termination of the master lease. The net working capital assumed by NHI on April 1, 2022 was comprised primarily of facility furniture, fixtures and equipment, net resident accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.
Note 10. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
The interest held by Merrill in its SHOP venture was classified as a “Redeemable noncontrolling interest” in the mezzanine section between Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022. Certain provisions within the operating agreement of the Merrill venture provide Merrill with put rights upon certain contingent events
100
that are not solely within the control of the Company. Therefore, Merrill’s noncontrolling interest was determined to be contingently redeemable. The redeemable noncontrolling interest is not currently redeemable and we concluded a contingent redemption event is not probable to occur as of December 31, 2022. Consequently, the noncontrolling interest will not be subsequently remeasured to its redemption amount until such contingent event and the related redemption are probable to occur. We will continue to reflect the attribution of gains or losses to the redeemable noncontrolling interest each period.
The Discovery member’s noncontrolling interest in its SHOP venture was also determined to be contingently redeemable at inception of the arrangement. The Discovery member’s agreement was amended in the fourth quarter of 2022 to remove the contingently redeemable feature, among other things. The noncontrolling interest is presented within the “Liabilities and Equity” section in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022.
The following table presents the change in redeemable noncontrolling interest for the year ended December 31, 2022 ($ in thousands):
| Year Ended | |||||
| December 31, 2022 | |||||
| Balance at January 1, | $ | — | |||
| Initial carrying amount | 11,738 | ||||
| Reclassification of Discovery member noncontrolling interest | (1,030) | ||||
| Net loss | (843) | ||||
| Distributions | (40) | ||||
| Balance at December 31, | $ | 9,825 | |||
Note 11. Equity and Dividends
Share Repurchase Plan
On April 15, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan for up to $240.0 million of the Company’s common stock (the “2022 Repurchase Plan”). During the year ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased through open market transactions 2,468,354 shares of common stock for an average price of $61.56 per share, excluding commissions. All shares received were constructively retired upon receipt, and the excess of the purchase price over the par value per share was recorded to “Cumulative dividends in excess of net income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $88.4 million remaining under the 2022 Repurchase Plan.
On February 17, 2023, our Board of Directors terminated the current stock repurchase program and authorized a revised repurchase program (the “Revised Repurchase Plan”) pursuant to which we may purchase up to $160.0 million in shares of our issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Revised Repurchase Plan is effective for a period of one year and does not require us to repurchase any specific number of shares. The Revised Repurchase Plan may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Shares may be repurchased from time-to-time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions or by other means in accordance with the terms of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and shall be made in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations in effect. The timing and number of shares repurchased, if any, will depend on a variety of factors, including price, general market and economic conditions, alternative investment opportunities and other corporate considerations.
At-the-Market (ATM) Equity Program
Our ATM equity offering sales agreement allows us to sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate sales price of $500 million of the Company’s common shares through the ATM program. No shares were issued during the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued 661,951 common shares through the ATM program with an average price of $73.62, resulting in net proceeds after transaction costs of approximately $47.9 million.
Dividends
The following table summarizes dividends declared or paid by the Board of Directors during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
101
| Year Ended December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of Declaration | Date of Record | Date Paid/Payable | Quarterly Dividend | |||||||||||||||||
| February 16, 2022 | March 31, 2022 | May 6, 2022 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| May 6, 2022 | June 30, 2022 | August 5, 2022 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| August 5, 2022 | September 30, 2022 | November 4, 2022 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| November 6, 2022 | December 30, 2022 | January 27, 2033 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of Declaration | Date of Record | Date Paid/Payable | Quarterly Dividend | |||||||||||||||||
| March 12, 2021 | March 31, 2021 | May 7, 2021 | $1.1025 | |||||||||||||||||
| June 3, 2021 | June 30, 2021 | August 6, 2021 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| August 6, 2021 | September 30, 2021 | November 5, 2021 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
| November 5, 2021 | December 31, 2021 | January 31, 2022 | $0.90 | |||||||||||||||||
On February 17, 2023, the Board of Directors declared a $0.90 per share dividend to common stockholders of record on March 31, 2023, payable May 5, 2023.
Note 12. Share-Based Compensation
We recognize share-based compensation for all stock options granted over the requisite service period using the fair value of these grants as estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model over the requisite service period using the market value of our publicly traded common stock on the date of grant.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has the authority to select the participants to be granted options; to designate whether the option granted is an incentive stock option (“ISO”), a non-qualified option, or a stock appreciation right; to establish the number of shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of the option; to establish the vesting provision for any award; and to establish the term any award may be outstanding. The exercise price of any ISO’s granted will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date granted and the term of an ISO may not be more than ten years. The exercise price of any non-qualified options granted will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date granted unless so determined by the Committee.
The Company’s outstanding stock incentive awards have been granted under two incentive plans – the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (“2012 Plan”) and the 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (“2019” Plan”). The individual option grant awards may vest over periods up to five years. The term of the options under the 2019 Plan is up to ten years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2022, shares available for future grants totaled 1,422,336 under the 2019 Plan.
Compensation expense is recognized only for the awards that ultimately vest. Accordingly, forfeitures that were not expected may result in the reversal of previously recorded compensation expense. The following is a summary of share-based compensation expense, net of any forfeitures, included in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income ($ in thousands):
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-cash share-based compensation expense | $ | 8,613 | $ | 8,415 | $ | 3,061 | |||||||||||
Determining Fair Value of Option Awards
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the weighted average assumptions indicated in the following table. Each grant is valued as a single award with an expected term based upon expected employee and termination behavior. Compensation cost is recognized on the graded vesting method over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards. The expected volatility is derived using daily historical data for periods preceding the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is the approximate yield on the United States Treasury Strips having a life equal to the expected option life on the date of grant. The expected life is an estimate of the number of years an option will be held before it is exercised.
102
Stock Options
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $11.92, $14.54 and $5.57 for December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The fair value of each grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividend yield | 7.0% | 6.7% | 5.1% | ||||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | 49.3% | 48.1% | 17.1% | ||||||||||||||
| Expected lives | 2.9 years | 2.9 years | 2.9 years | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.75% | 0.33% | 1.30% | ||||||||||||||
Stock Option Activity
The following tables summarize our outstanding stock options:
| Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Weighted Average | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||
| of Shares | Exercise Price | Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding December 31, 2019 | 1,004,014 | $74.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options granted under 2012 Plan | 319,669 | $90.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options granted under 2019 Plan | 272,331 | $89.76 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised under 2012 Plan | (512,509) | $72.98 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited under 2012 Plan | (16,669) | $81.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited under 2019 Plan | (32,998) | $90.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding December 31, 2020 | 1,033,838 | $83.54 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options granted under 2012 Plan | 12,500 | $69.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options granted under 2019 Plan | 639,500 | $69.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised under 2012 Plan | (20,000) | $60.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited under 2019 Plan | (13,333) | $90.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding December 31, 2021 | 1,652,505 | $78.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options granted under 2019 Plan | 718,000 | $53.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised under 2019 Plan | (56,832) | $53.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited | (23,000) | $62.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options expired | (74,498) | $77.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2022 | 2,216,175 | $70.97 | 2.81 | |||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at December 31, 2022 | 1,701,155 | $74.78 | 2.50 | |||||||||||||||||
| Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Grant | Number | Exercise | Contractual | |||||||||||||||||
| Date | of Shares | Price | Life in Years | |||||||||||||||||
| 2/20/2018 | 88,170 | $ | 64.33 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2/21/2019 | 306,837 | $ | 79.96 | 1.14 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2/21/2020 | 523,500 | $ | 90.79 | 2.15 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5/1/2020 | 7,500 | $ | 53.76 | 2.33 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2/25/2021 | 639,000 | $ | 69.20 | 3.16 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2/25/2022 | 626,168 | $ | 53.41 | 4.16 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6/1/2022 | 25,000 | $ | 59.43 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2022 | 2,216,175 | |||||||||||||||||||
103
Including outstanding stock options, our stockholders have authorized an additional 3,638,511 shares of common stock that may be issued under the share-based compensation plans.
The following table summarizes our outstanding non-vested stock options:
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Non-vested December 31, 2021 | 482,514 | $7.51 | |||||||||
| Options granted under 2019 Plan | 718,000 | $11.77 | |||||||||
| Options vested under 2012 Plan | (76,670) | $6.16 | |||||||||
| Options vested under 2019 Plan | (594,490) | $11.83 | |||||||||
| Non-vested options forfeited under 2019 Plan | (14,334) | $12.47 | |||||||||
| Non-vested December 31, 2022 | 515,020 | $12.51 | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2022, unrecognized compensation expense totaling $1.7 million associated with unvested stock options is expected to be recognized over the following periods: 2023 - $1.5 million and 2024 - $0.2 million. Share-based compensation expense is included in “General and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
At December 31, 2022, there was no material intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $0.1 million or $6.13 per share; $0.2 million or $9.27 per share, and $8.1 million or $15.84 per share, respectively.
Note 13. Earnings Per Common Share
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period is used to calculate basic earnings per common share. Diluted earnings per common share assume the exercise of stock options and the conversion of our convertible debt prior to its retirement using the treasury stock method, to the extent dilutive. Dilution resulting from the conversion option within our convertible debt that was repaid in April 2021 was determined by computing an average of incremental shares included in the three months ended March 31, 2021 diluted EPS computation. If our average stock price for the period is higher than the conversion price of our convertible debt, the conversion feature is considered dilutive.
The following table summarizes the average number of common shares and the net income used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share ($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
104
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 66,403 | $ | 111,804 | $ | 185,126 | |||||||||||
| BASIC: | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 44,774,708 | 45,714,221 | 44,696,285 | ||||||||||||||
| DILUTED: | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 44,774,708 | 45,714,221 | 44,696,285 | ||||||||||||||
| Stock options | 19,528 | 4,823 | 1,719 | ||||||||||||||
| Convertible debt | — | 10,453 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding | 44,794,236 | 45,729,497 | 44,698,004 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic | $ | 1.48 | $ | 2.45 | $ | 4.14 | |||||||||||
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - diluted | $ | 1.48 | $ | 2.44 | $ | 4.14 | |||||||||||
| Incremental anti-dilutive shares excluded: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net share effect of stock options with an exercise price in excess of the | |||||||||||||||||
| average market price for our common shares | 564,803 | 383,716 | 390,596 | ||||||||||||||
| Regular dividends declared per common share | $ | 3.60 | $ | 3.8025 | $ | 4.41 | |||||||||||
Note 14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows ($ in thousands):
| Carrying Amount | Fair Value Measurement | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable rate debt | $ | 277,699 | $ | 373,682 | $ | 282,000 | $ | 375,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate debt | $ | 869,812 | $ | 869,201 | $ | 773,994 | $ | 858,124 | |||||||||||||||
| Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage and other notes receivable, net | $ | 233,141 | $ | 299,952 | $ | 227,611 | $ | 314,821 | |||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt. Fixed rate debt is classified as Level 2 and its value is based on quoted prices for similar instruments or calculated utilizing model derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Mortgage and other notes receivable. The fair value of mortgage and other notes receivable is based on credit risk and discount rates that are not observable in the marketplace and therefore represents a Level 3 measurement.
Carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair values of our borrowings under our revolving credit facility and other variable rate debt are reasonably estimated at their notional amounts at December 31, 2022 and 2021, due to the predominance of floating interest rates, which generally reflect market conditions.
Note 15. Income Taxes
Beginning with our inception in 1991, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. We have recorded state income tax expense of $0.1 million related to a Texas franchise tax that has attributes of an income tax for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. Some of our leases require taxes to be reimbursed by our tenants. State income taxes are combined in “Franchise, excise and other taxes” in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
105
The Company has a deferred tax asset, which is fully reserved through a valuation allowance, of $1.5 million and $1.6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The deferred tax asset is primarily a result of net operating losses from its participation in the operations of a joint venture during the years 2012 through 2016, and income generated by entities that are structured as TRSs under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. See Notes 5 and 6 for a discussion of SHOP ventures and Timber Ridge OpCo.
The Company made state income tax payments of $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020.
Dividend payments to common stockholders for the last three years are characterized for tax purposes as follows on a per share basis:
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 2.61966 | $ | 2.87799 | $ | 3.50400 | |||||||||||
| Capital gain | — | 0.43890 | 0.10999 | ||||||||||||||
| Return of capital | 0.98034 | 0.48562 | 0.79603 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid per common share | $ | 3.60 | $ | 3.8025 | $ | 4.41 | |||||||||||
Note 16. Segment Reporting
We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our two operating segments: Real Estate Investments and SHOP. Our Real Estate Investments segment includes real estate investments and mortgage and other notes receivables in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities and a hospital. Under the Real Estate Investments segment, we invest in seniors housing and health-care real estate through acquisition and financing of primarily single- tenant properties. Properties acquired are primarily leased under triple-net leases, and we are not involved in the management of the property. SHOP includes multi-tenant independent living facilities. The SHOP properties and related operations are controlled by the Company and are operated by property managers in exchange for a management fee (reference Note 5).
We formed the SHOP segment effective April 1, 2022 upon termination of the triple-net lease for the legacy Holiday portfolio at which time the operations and properties of 15 ILFs were transferred into two separate ventures, as discussed further in Notes 5 and 8. The results associated with the prior triple-net lease structure for these properties are included in the Real Estate Investments segment and the results from operating these SHOP properties after the transition are included in our new SHOP segment. There is no impact to the prior year’s presentation.
Our chief operating decision maker evaluates performance based upon segment NOI. We define NOI as total revenues, less tenant reimbursements and property operating expenses. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties. There were no intersegment transactions for the year ended December 31, 2022. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2022 were approximately $30.8 million for the Real Estate Investments segment and $3.3 million for the SHOP segment.
Non-segment revenue consists mainly of other income. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, deferred loan expenses and corporate offices and equipment among others. Non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining NOI.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). The results of operations for all acquisitions described in Notes 3 and 4 are included in our consolidated results of operations from the acquisition dates and are components of the appropriate segments.
Summary information for the reportable segments during the year ended December 31, 2022 is as follows ($ in thousands):
106
| For the year ended December 31, 2022: | Real Estate Investments | SHOP | Non-segment/Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rental income | $ | 217,700 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 217,700 | |||||||||||||||
| Resident fees and services | — | 35,796 | — | 35,796 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income and other | 24,383 | — | 315 | 24,698 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 242,083 | 35,796 | 315 | 278,194 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Senior housing operating expenses | — | 28,193 | — | 28,193 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Taxes and insurance on leased properties | 9,788 | — | — | 9,788 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NOI | 232,295 | 7,603 | 315 | 240,213 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 64,407 | 6,408 | 65 | 70,880 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | 3,089 | — | 41,828 | 44,917 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Legal | — | — | 2,555 | 2,555 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Franchise, excise and other taxes | — | — | 844 | 844 | |||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | — | — | 22,768 | 22,768 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loan and realty losses | 61,911 | — | — | 61,911 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of real estate, net | (28,342) | — | — | (28,342) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on operations transfer, net | 710 | — | — | 710 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on note receivable payoff | (1,113) | — | — | (1,113) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on early retirement of debt | — | — | 151 | 151 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains from equity method investment | (569) | — | — | (569) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 132,202 | $ | 1,195 | $ | (67,896) | $ | 65,501 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 2,225,176 | $ | 274,135 | $ | 8,113 | $ | 2,507,424 | |||||||||||||||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures. As of December 31, 2022, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of management’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) to ensure information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Exchange Act, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives, and management is necessarily required to apply its judgment when evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of potential controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation during the quarter ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
107
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of National Health Investors, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, BDO USA, LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting included herein.
108
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
National Health Investors, Inc.
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited National Health Investors, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedules and our report dated February 21, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
February 21, 2023
109
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
On February 17, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s Bylaws (the “Amended and Restated Bylaws”), effective immediately. The Amended and Restated Bylaws include the following changes, among other things:
•Confirm procedures relating to stockholder meetings, including with respect to the Company’s ability to cancel, reschedule or postpone such meetings, proxies, determination of the record date, inspectors of election, powers of the presiding officer to regulate conduct at such meetings and participation in such meetings solely or in part by means of remote communication;
•Confirm procedures relating to meetings of the Board of Directors, including with respect to quorum and voting requirements, and participation in such meetings solely or in part by means of remote communication;
•Require stockholders calling a special meeting to pay the costs of preparing and mailing the related notice to stockholders;
•Require that any stockholder soliciting proxies from other stockholders use a proxy card color other than white (white is reserved for exclusive use by the Board of Directors);
•Update the timing for notice of, and enhance procedures and disclosure requirements relating to, stockholder nominations of directors, including to address new Rule 14a-19, relating to use of universal proxies in contested director elections;
•Add an advance notice provision for, and detail procedure and disclosure requirements relating to, the submission of stockholder proposals made in connection with an annual meeting of stockholders;
•Clarify the independence requirements for directors and update provisions regarding the size and composition of committees of the Board of Directors;
•Update provisions regarding the Chairperson of the Board of Directors and the Company’s officers;
•Update the stock certificate, stock transfer and lost certificate provisions to expressly contemplate uncertificated shares and to allow more flexibility in replacing lost certificates;
•Remove certain superfluous provisions originating from when the Company was managed by a third party;
•Conform stockholder inspection rights to reflect the rights conferred under Maryland law;
•Remove the provision requiring specific reports and other statements to be delivered to stockholders (as these requirements are driven by applicable law);
•Update the voting standard for stockholders to amend the bylaws to a majority of votes cast, consistent with Maryland law;
•Add new provisions relating to:
•Advancement of expenses to directors and officers party to a proceeding for which indemnification may be available;
◦Reliance by directors and officers on certain information, opinions, reports or statements prepared or presented by an officer or employee of the Company, or by a lawyer, CPA or other person meeting specific requirements;
◦Ratification by the Board of Directors or stockholders of (i) any action or inaction by the Company or an officer to the extent the Board of Directors or the stockholders could have originally authorized the matter, and (ii) any action or inaction questioned in any stockholders’ derivative or other proceeding on certain enumerated grounds which, if so ratified, would have the same force and effect as if the questioned action or inaction had been originally duly authorized; and
◦Authority of Board of Directors to act in emergency circumstances that would otherwise prevent a quorum from being achieved;
•Allow notices to directors, officers and stockholders to be delivered electronically, and contemplate the “householding” of materials delivered to stockholders;
•Update various other provisions to conform to provisions of Maryland law; and
•Make various other updates, including technical, ministerial, modernizing, clarifying, refining and conforming changes, and including changes in furtherance of gender neutrality.
The foregoing summary and description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended and Restated Bylaws, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 3.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not Applicable.
110
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are filed as part of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (BDO USA, LLP; Nashville, TN; PCAOB ID#243)
Consolidated Balance Sheets – At December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Equity – Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The Financial Statement Schedules are included here following the signature page.
(3) Exhibits
Exhibits required as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.
111
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022
112
113
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
114
ITEM 16. SUMMARY
None.
115
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | |||||
BY:/s/ D. Eric Mendelsohn | |||||
| D. Eric Mendelsohn | |||||
| DATE: February 21, 2023 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
116
| Signature | Title | Date | |||||||||
| /s/ D. Eric Mendelsohn | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| D. Eric Mendelsohn | (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ John L. Spaid | Chief Financial Officer | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| John L. Spaid | (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ David L. Travis | Chief Accounting Officer | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| David L. Travis | (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ W. Andrew Adams | Chairman of the Board | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| W. Andrew Adams | |||||||||||
| /s/ James R. Jobe | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| James R. Jobe | |||||||||||
| /s/ Robert A. McCabe, Jr. | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| Robert A. McCabe, Jr. | |||||||||||
| /s/ Robert T. Webb | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| Robert T. Webb | |||||||||||
| /s/ Charlotte A. Swafford | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| Charlotte A. Swafford | |||||||||||
| /s/ Robert G. Adams | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| Robert G. Adams | |||||||||||
| /s/ Tracy M. J. Colden | Director | February 21, 2023 | |||||||||
| Tracy M. J. Colden | |||||||||||
117
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real Estate Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skilled Nursing Facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anniston, AL | $ | — | $ | 70 | $ | 4,477 | $ | — | $ | 70 | $ | 4,477 | $ | 4,547 | $ | 3,730 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Moulton, AL | — | 25 | 688 | — | 25 | 688 | 713 | 688 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Avondale, AZ | — | 453 | 6,678 | — | 453 | 6,678 | 7,131 | 4,489 | 8/13/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brooksville, FL | — | 1,217 | 16,166 | — | 1,217 | 16,166 | 17,383 | 5,220 | 2/1/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crystal River, FL | — | 912 | 12,117 | — | 912 | 12,117 | 13,029 | 3,913 | 2/1/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dade City, FL | — | 605 | 8,042 | — | 605 | 8,042 | 8,647 | 2,597 | 2/1/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hudson, FL (2 facilities) | — | 1,290 | 22,392 | — | 1,290 | 22,392 | 23,682 | 12,840 | Various | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Merritt Island, FL | — | 701 | 8,869 | — | 701 | 8,869 | 9,570 | 7,722 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Port Richey, FL | — | 228 | 3,023 | — | 228 | 3,023 | 3,251 | 976 | 2/1/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plant City, FL | — | 405 | 8,777 | — | 405 | 8,777 | 9,182 | 7,572 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stuart, FL | — | 787 | 9,048 | — | 787 | 9,048 | 9,835 | 8,023 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trenton, FL | — | 851 | 11,312 | — | 851 | 11,312 | 12,163 | 3,653 | 2/1/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Glasgow, KY | — | 33 | 2,110 | — | 33 | 2,110 | 2,143 | 2,066 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Desloge, MO | — | 178 | 3,804 | — | 178 | 3,804 | 3,982 | 3,804 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Joplin, MO | — | 175 | 4,034 | — | 175 | 4,034 | 4,209 | 3,283 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kennett, MO | — | 180 | 4,928 | — | 180 | 4,928 | 5,108 | 4,799 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maryland Heights, MO | — | 150 | 4,790 | — | 150 | 4,790 | 4,940 | 4,668 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| St. Charles, MO | — | 420 | 5,512 | — | 420 | 5,512 | 5,932 | 5,512 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Albany, OR | — | 190 | 10,415 | — | 190 | 10,415 | 10,605 | 2,700 | 3/31/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Creswell, OR | — | 470 | 8,946 | — | 470 | 8,946 | 9,416 | 2,216 | 3/31/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forest Grove, OR | — | 540 | 11,848 | — | 540 | 11,848 | 12,388 | 2,981 | 3/31/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anderson, SC | — | 308 | 4,643 | — | 308 | 4,643 | 4,951 | 4,494 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenwood, SC | — | 174 | 3,457 | 174 | 3,457 | 3,631 | 3,268 | 10/17/1991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Laurens, SC | — | 42 | 3,426 | — | 42 | 3,426 | 3,468 | 3,149 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orangeburg, SC | — | 300 | 3,714 | — | 300 | 3,714 | 4,014 | 1,386 | 9/25/2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Athens, TN | — | 38 | 1,463 | — | 38 | 1,463 | 1,501 | 1,370 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chattanooga, TN | — | 143 | 2,309 | — | 143 | 2,309 | 2,452 | 2,297 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dickson, TN | — | 90 | 3,541 | — | 90 | 3,541 | 3,631 | 3,254 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Franklin, TN | — | 47 | 1,130 | — | 47 | 1,130 | 1,177 | 1,130 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
118
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hendersonville, TN | — | 363 | 3,837 | — | 363 | 3,837 | 4,200 | 3,360 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Johnson City, TN | — | 85 | 1,918 | — | 85 | 1,918 | 2,003 | 1,917 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lewisburg, TN (2 facilities) | — | 46 | 994 | — | 46 | 994 | 1,040 | 994 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McMinnville, TN | — | 73 | 3,618 | — | 73 | 3,618 | 3,691 | 3,235 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Milan, TN | — | 41 | 1,826 | — | 41 | 1,826 | 1,867 | 1,704 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pulaski, TN | — | 53 | 3,921 | — | 53 | 3,921 | 3,974 | 3,500 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lawrenceburg, TN | — | 98 | 2,900 | — | 98 | 2,900 | 2,998 | 2,469 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dunlap, TN | — | 35 | 3,679 | — | 35 | 3,679 | 3,714 | 3,146 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Smithville, TN | — | 35 | 3,816 | — | 35 | 3,816 | 3,851 | 3,358 | 10/18/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Somerville, TN | — | 26 | 677 | — | 26 | 677 | 703 | 678 | 10/19/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sparta, TN | — | 80 | 1,602 | — | 80 | 1,602 | 1,682 | 1,536 | 10/20/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Austin, TX | — | 606 | 9,895 | — | 606 | 9,895 | 10,501 | 1,966 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canton, TX | — | 420 | 12,330 | — | 420 | 12,330 | 12,750 | 3,701 | 4/18/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corinth, TX | — | 1,075 | 13,935 | — | 1,075 | 13,935 | 15,010 | 4,400 | 4/18/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ennis, TX | — | 986 | 9,025 | — | 986 | 9,025 | 10,011 | 3,099 | 10/31/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Euless, TX | — | 1,241 | 12,629 | — | 1,241 | 12,629 | 13,870 | 2,727 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fort Worth, TX | — | 1,380 | 14,370 | — | 1,380 | 14,370 | 15,750 | 2,255 | 5/10/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Garland, TX | — | 1,440 | 14,310 | — | 1,440 | 14,310 | 15,750 | 2,241 | 5/10/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gladewater, TX | — | 70 | 17,840 | — | 70 | 17,840 | 17,910 | 3,368 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenville, TX | — | 1,800 | 13,948 | — | 1,800 | 13,948 | 15,748 | 4,544 | 10/31/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Houston, TX (3 facilities) | — | 2,808 | 42,511 | — | 2,808 | 42,511 | 45,319 | 14,469 | Various | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Katy, TX | — | 610 | 13,893 | — | 610 | 13,893 | 14,503 | 2,789 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kyle, TX | — | 1,096 | 12,279 | — | 1,096 | 12,279 | 13,375 | 4,056 | 6/11/2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marble Falls, TX | — | 480 | 14,989 | — | 480 | 14,989 | 15,469 | 2,932 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McAllen, TX | — | 1,175 | 8,259 | — | 1,175 | 8,259 | 9,434 | 1,817 | 4/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Braunfels, TX | — | 1,430 | 13,666 | — | 1,430 | 13,666 | 15,096 | 2,709 | 2/24/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Antonio, TX (3 facilities) | — | 2,370 | 40,054 | — | 2,370 | 40,054 | 42,424 | 10,660 | Various | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Waxahachie, TX | — | 1,330 | 14,349 | — | 1,330 | 14,349 | 15,679 | 2,399 | 1/17/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bristol, VA | — | 176 | 2,511 | — | 176 | 2,511 | 2,687 | 2,511 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oak Creek, WI | — | 2,000 | 14,903 | 7,403 | 2,000 | 22,306 | 24,306 | 2,150 | 12/7/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 34,450 | 516,143 | 7,403 | 34,450 | 523,546 | 557,996 | 214,490 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assisted Living Facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rainbow City, AL | — | 670 | 11,330 | — | 670 | 11,330 | 12,000 | 2,929 | 10/31/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sacramento, CA | — | 660 | 10,840 | — | 660 | 10,840 | 11,500 | 2,681 | 6/1/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pueblo West, CO | — | 169 | 7,431 | — | 169 | 7,431 | 7,600 | 761 | 7/23/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greensboro, GA | — | 672 | 4,849 | 631 | 672 | 5,480 | 6,152 | 1,560 | 9/15/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ames, IA | 3,193 | 360 | 4,670 | — | 360 | 4,670 | 5,030 | 1,252 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Burlington, IA | 3,901 | 200 | 8,374 | — | 200 | 8,374 | 8,574 | 2,253 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cedar Falls, IA | — | 260 | 4,700 | 30 | 260 | 4,730 | 4,990 | 1,303 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ft. Dodge, IA | 4,008 | 100 | 7,208 | — | 100 | 7,208 | 7,308 | 1,899 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Iowa City, IA | — | 297 | 2,725 | 33 | 297 | 2,758 | 3,055 | 975 | 6/30/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marshalltown, IA | 5,714 | 240 | 6,208 | — | 240 | 6,208 | 6,448 | 1,662 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Urbandale, IA | 8,113 | 540 | 4,292 | — | 540 | 4,292 | 4,832 | 1,192 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caldwell, ID | — | 320 | 9,353 | — | 320 | 9,353 | 9,673 | 2,311 | 3/31/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aurora, IL | — | 1,195 | 11,713 | — | 1,195 | 11,713 | 12,908 | 2,337 | 5/9/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bolingbrook, IL | — | 1,290 | 14,677 | — | 1,290 | 14,677 | 15,967 | 2,370 | 3/16/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bourbonnais, IL | 7,974 | 170 | 16,594 | — | 170 | 16,594 | 16,764 | 4,314 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crystal Lake, IL (2 facilities) | — | 1,060 | 30,043 | 170 | 1,060 | 30,213 | 31,273 | 5,106 | Various | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gurnee, IL | — | 1,244 | 13,856 | — | 1,244 | 13,856 | 15,100 | 1,370 | 9/10/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Moline, IL | 3,896 | 250 | 5,630 | — | 250 | 5,630 | 5,880 | 1,523 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oswego, IL | — | 390 | 20,957 | 212 | 390 | 21,169 | 21,559 | 3,701 | 6/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quincy, IL | 6,055 | 360 | 12,403 | — | 360 | 12,403 | 12,763 | 3,261 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rockford, IL | 6,412 | 390 | 12,575 | — | 390 | 12,575 | 12,965 | 3,339 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Barrington, IL | — | 1,610 | 13,456 | — | 1,610 | 13,456 | — | 15,066 | 2,218 | 3/16/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| St. Charles, IL | — | 820 | 22,188 | 252 | 820 | 22,440 | 23,260 | 3,961 | 6/1/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tinley Park, IL | — | 1,622 | 11,354 | — | 1,622 | 11,354 | 12,976 | 2,418 | 6/23/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Attica, IN | — | 284 | 7,891 | — | 284 | 7,891 | 8,175 | 636 | 5/1/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carmel, IN | — | 463 | 7,055 | — | 463 | 7,055 | 7,518 | 2,167 | 11/12/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crawfordsville, IN | — | 300 | 3,134 | — | 300 | 3,134 | 3,434 | 849 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crown Point, IN | — | 574 | 7,336 | 353 | 574 | 7,689 | 8,263 | 2,268 | 10/30/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenwood, IN | — | 791 | 7,020 | 227 | 791 | 7,247 | 8,038 | 2,239 | 11/7/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Linton, IN | — | 60 | 6,015 | — | 60 | 6,015 | 6,075 | 486 | 5/1/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bastrop, LA | — | 325 | 2,456 | — | 325 | 2,456 | 2,781 | 822 | 4/30/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bossier City, LA | — | 500 | 3,344 | — | 500 | 3,344 | 3,844 | 1,152 | 4/30/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
120
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minden, LA | — | 280 | 1,698 | — | 280 | 1,698 | 1,978 | 566 | 4/30/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Monroe, LA | — | 770 | 5,627 | — | 770 | 5,627 | 6,397 | 1,818 | 4/30/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Battle Creek, MI | — | 398 | 3,093 | 197 | 398 | 3,290 | 3,688 | 1,280 | 10/19/2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lansing, MI | — | 1,020 | 9,684 | 174 | 1,020 | 9,858 | 10,878 | 1,712 | 10/19/2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Okemos, MI | — | 340 | 8,082 | — | 340 | 8,082 | 8,422 | 2,924 | 11/19/2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shelby, MI | — | 1,588 | 13,512 | — | 1,588 | 13,512 | 15,100 | 1,199 | 1/27/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Champlin, MN | — | 980 | 4,475 | — | 980 | 4,475 | 5,455 | 1,553 | 3/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hugo, MN | — | 400 | 3,945 | 113 | 400 | 4,058 | 4,458 | 1,332 | 3/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maplewood, MN | — | 1,700 | 6,544 | — | 1,700 | 6,544 | 8,244 | 2,272 | 3/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| North Branch, MN | — | 595 | 3,053 | — | 595 | 3,053 | 3,648 | 1,090 | 3/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mahtomedi, MN | — | 515 | 8,825 | — | 515 | 8,825 | 9,340 | 750 | 12/27/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charlotte, NC | — | 650 | 17,663 | 2,000 | 650 | 19,663 | 20,313 | 4,055 | 7/1/2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Durham, NC | — | 860 | 7,752 | — | 860 | 7,752 | 8,612 | 989 | 12/15/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hendersonville, NC (2 facilities) | — | 3,120 | 12,980 | — | 3,120 | 12,980 | 16,100 | 2,272 | 3/16/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lincoln, NE | 8,418 | 380 | 10,904 | — | 380 | 10,904 | 11,284 | 2,828 | 6/28/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Omaha, NE (2 facilities) | 2,455 | 1,110 | 15,437 | 851 | 1,110 | 16,288 | 17,398 | 3,623 | Various | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lancaster, OH | — | 530 | 20,530 | — | 530 | 20,530 | 21,060 | 4,670 | 7/31/2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middletown, OH | — | 940 | 15,548 | — | 940 | 15,548 | 16,488 | 3,649 | 10/31/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rocky River, OH | 650 | 4,189 | — | 650 | 4,189 | 4,839 | 839 | 4/30/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Worthington, OH | — | — | 18,869 | 1,476 | — | 20,345 | — | 20,345 | 3,286 | 4/30/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McMinnville, OR | — | 390 | 9,183 | — | 390 | 9,183 | 9,573 | 1,702 | 8/31/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portland, OR | — | 930 | 25,270 | — | 930 | 25,270 | 26,200 | 3,937 | 8/31/2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Erie, PA | — | 1,030 | 15,206 | 921 | 1,030 | 16,127 | — | 17,157 | 1,987 | 4/30/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reading, PA | — | 1,027 | 11,179 | — | 1,027 | 11,179 | 12,206 | 1,201 | 5/31/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manchester, TN | — | 534 | 6,068 | — | 534 | 6,068 | 6,602 | 320 | 6/3/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fredericksburg, VA | — | 1,615 | 9,271 | — | 1,615 | 9,271 | 10,886 | 1,926 | 9/20/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Midlothian, VA | — | 1,646 | 8,635 | — | 1,646 | 8,635 | 10,281 | 1,852 | 10/31/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Suffolk, VA | — | 1,022 | 9,320 | — | 1,022 | 9,320 | 10,342 | 1,742 | 3/25/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virginia Beach, VA | — | 2,052 | 15,148 | — | 2,052 | 15,148 | 17,200 | 35 | 11/10/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bellevue, WI | — | 504 | 11,796 | — | 504 | 11,796 | 12,300 | 825 | 9/30/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oshkosh, WI | — | 542 | 12,758 | 542 | 12,758 | 13,300 | 243 | 4/29/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60,139 | 46,304 | 637,921 | 7,640 | 46,304 | 645,561 | 691,865 | 125,792 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
121
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Independent Living Facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vero Beach, FL | — | 550 | 37,450 | 1,293 | 550 | 350 | 38,743 | 39,293 | 4,232 | 2/1/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Columbus, IN | — | 348 | 6,124 | — | 348 | 6,124 | 6,472 | 635 | 5/31/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| St. Charles, MO | — | 344 | 3,181 | — | 344 | 3,181 | 3,525 | 2,723 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tulsa, OK | 16,510 | 1,980 | 32,620 | 502 | 1,980 | 33,122 | 35,102 | 4,756 | 12/1/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chattanooga, TN | — | 9 | 1,567 | 1 | 9 | 1,568 | 1,577 | 1,437 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Johnson City, TN | — | 55 | 4,077 | — | 55 | 4,077 | 4,132 | 3,294 | 10/17/1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chehalis, WA | — | 1,980 | 7,710 | 7,445 | 1,980 | 15,155 | 17,135 | 2,246 | 1/15/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16,510 | 5,266 | 92,729 | 9,241 | 5,266 | 101,970 | 107,236 | 19,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Living Campuses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loma Linda, CA | — | 1,200 | 10,800 | 7,326 | 1,200 | 18,126 | 19,326 | 4,628 | 9/28/2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maitland, FL | — | 2,317 | 9,161 | 491 | 2,317 | 9,652 | 11,969 | 6,920 | 8/6/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michigan City, IN | — | 974 | 22,667 | — | 974 | 22,667 | 23,641 | 2,325 | 5/31/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portage, IN | — | 661 | 21,959 | — | 661 | 21,959 | 22,620 | 2,257 | 5/31/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Needham, MA | — | 5,500 | 45,157 | 1,451 | 5,500 | 46,608 | 52,108 | 5,756 | 1/15/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Salisbury, MD | — | 1,876 | 44,084 | 471 | 1,876 | 44,555 | 46,431 | 4,751 | 5/31/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Roscommon, MI | — | 44 | 6,005 | 1 | 44 | 6,006 | 6,050 | 1,357 | 8/31/2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mt. Airy, NC | — | 1,370 | 7,470 | 150 | 1,370 | 7,620 | 8,990 | 1,791 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McMinnville, OR | — | 410 | 26,667 | — | 410 | 26,667 | 27,077 | 4,657 | 8/31/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Silverdale, WA | — | 1,750 | 23,860 | 2,167 | 1,750 | 26,027 | 27,777 | 7,367 | 8/16/2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 16,102 | 217,830 | 12,057 | 16,102 | 229,887 | 245,989 | 41,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
122
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entrance-Fee Communities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bridgeport, CT | — | 4,320 | 23,494 | 5,566 | 4,320 | 29,060 | 33,380 | 5,626 | 6/2/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| North Branford, CT | — | 7,724 | 64,430 | — | 7,724 | 64,430 | 72,154 | 11,370 | 11/3/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southbury, CT | — | 10,320 | 17,143 | 5,880 | 10,320 | 23,023 | 33,343 | 4,115 | 6/2/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fernandina Beach, FL | — | 1,430 | 63,420 | 1,522 | 1,430 | 64,942 | 66,372 | 14,456 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| St. Simons Island, GA | — | 8,770 | 38,070 | 963 | 8,770 | 39,033 | 47,803 | 8,889 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Winston-Salem, NC | — | 8,700 | 73,920 | 507 | 8,700 | 74,427 | 83,127 | 16,548 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenville, SC | — | 5,850 | 90,760 | — | 5,850 | 90,760 | 96,610 | 19,876 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Myrtle Beach, SC | — | 3,910 | 82,140 | 542 | 3,910 | 82,682 | 86,592 | 18,534 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pawleys Island, SC | — | 1,480 | 38,620 | 460 | 1,480 | 39,080 | 40,560 | 9,069 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Spartanburg, SC | — | 900 | 49,190 | 1,021 | 900 | 50,211 | 51,111 | 11,282 | 12/17/2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issaquah, WA | — | 4,370 | 130,522 | — | 4,370 | 130,522 | 134,892 | 10,931 | 01/31/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 57,774 | 671,709 | 16,461 | 57,774 | 688,170 | 745,944 | 130,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hospitals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tulsa, OK | — | 1,470 | 38,780 | — | 1,470 | 38,780 | 40,250 | 1,649 | 5/28/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 1,470 | 38,780 | — | 1,470 | 38,780 | 40,250 | 1,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total real estate investments properties | 76,649 | 161,366 | 2,175,112 | 52,802 | 161,366 | 2,227,914 | 2,389,280 | 533,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Housing Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Independent Living Facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fort Smith, AR | — | 590 | 22,447 | 229 | 590 | 22,676 | 23,266 | 5,460 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rogers, AR | — | 1,470 | 25,282 | 135 | 1,470 | 25,417 | 26,887 | 6,140 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fresno, CA | — | 420 | 10,899 | 100 | 420 | 10,999 | 11,419 | 2,752 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Modesto, CA | — | 1,170 | 22,673 | 193 | 1,170 | 22,866 | 24,036 | 5,450 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pinole, CA | — | 1,020 | 18,066 | 276 | 1,020 | 18,342 | 19,362 | 4,385 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Roseville, CA | — | 630 | 31,343 | 240 | 630 | 31,583 | 32,213 | 7,538 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Covina, CA | — | 940 | 20,280 | 757 | 940 | 21,037 | 21,977 | 4,907 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Athens, GA | — | 910 | 31,940 | 243 | 910 | 32,183 | 33,093 | 7,693 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Columbus, GA | — | 570 | 8,639 | 264 | 570 | 8,903 | 9,473 | 2,217 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voorhees, NJ | — | 670 | 23,710 | 539 | 670 | 24,249 | 24,919 | 5,692 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gahanna, OH | — | 920 | 22,919 | 182 | 920 | 23,101 | 24,021 | 5,604 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
123
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company(C) | Capitalized | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings & | Subsequent to | Buildings & | Accumulated | Acquired/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encumbrances(A) | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total(D) | Depreciation(B) | Constructed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Broken Arrow, OK | — | 2,660 | 18,477 | 186 | 2,660 | 18,663 | 21,323 | 4,559 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenville, SC | — | 560 | 16,547 | 383 | 560 | 16,930 | 17,490 | 4,078 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Myrtle Beach, SC | — | 1,310 | 26,229 | 323 | 1,310 | 26,552 | 27,862 | 6,315 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vancouver, WA | — | 1,030 | 19,183 | 513 | 1,030 | 19,696 | 20,726 | 4,714 | 4/01/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total senior housing operating properties | — | 14,870 | 318,634 | 4,563 | 14,870 | 323,197 | 338,067 | 77,504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate office | — | 1,291 | 677 | 583 | 1,291 | 1,260 | 2,551 | 425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 76,649 | $ | 177,527 | $ | 2,494,423 | $ | 57,948 | $ | 177,527 | $ | 2,552,371 | $ | 2,729,898 | $ | 611,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(A) See the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(B) Depreciation is calculated using estimated useful lives up to 40 years for all completed facilities.
(C) Subsequent to NHC’s transfer of the original real estate properties in 1991, we purchased from NHC $33.9 million of additions to those properties. As the additions were purchased from NHC rather than developed by us, the $33.9 million has been included as Initial Cost to Company.
(D) At December 31, 2022, the tax basis of the Company’s net real estate assets was $2.2 billion.
124
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | |||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||||||||
| FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021, AND 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Investment in Real Estate: | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 2,894,548 | $ | 3,265,070 | $ | 3,074,846 | |||||||||||
| Additions through cash expenditures | 10,993 | 50,346 | 116,724 | ||||||||||||||
| Change in accounts payable related to investments in real estate construction | (69) | (388) | (784) | ||||||||||||||
| Change in other assets related to investments in real estate | 200 | — | 348 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating equipment received in lease termination | 1,287 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Additions through non-controlling interest | — | — | 10,778 | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate acquired in exchange for non-cash rental income | 3,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate acquired in exchange for mortgage notes receivable | 23,071 | — | 63,220 | ||||||||||||||
| Sale of properties for cash | (104,691) | (276,429) | (62) | ||||||||||||||
| Properties classified as held for sale | (84,761) | (137,651) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Property reclassified as held for use | 7,851 | ||||||||||||||||
| Impairment of property | (21,531) | (6,400) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 2,729,898 | $ | 2,894,548 | $ | 3,265,070 | |||||||||||
| Accumulated Depreciation: | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 576,668 | $ | 597,638 | $ | 514,453 | |||||||||||
| Addition charged to costs and expenses | 70,880 | 80,798 | 83,150 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of right-of-use asset | 36 | 36 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Sale of properties | (25,643) | (70,063) | 35 | ||||||||||||||
| Properties classified as held for sale | (11,092) | (31,741) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Property reclassified as held for use | 839 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 611,688 | $ | 576,668 | $ | 597,638 | |||||||||||
125
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monthly | Amount Subject To | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | Maturity | Payment | Prior | Original | Carrying | Delinquent Principal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rate | Date | Terms | Liens | Face Amount | Amount | or Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First Mortgages: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skilled nursing facilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lexington, VA | 8.0% | 2032-12-31 | $21,000 | $ | 3,089 | $ | 1,428 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Brookneal, VA | 8.0% | 2031-12-31 | $21,000 | $ | 2,780 | $ | 1,368 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Laurel Fork, VA | 8.0% | 2030-12-31 | $20,000 | $ | 2,672 | $ | 1,231 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Austin/San Antonio, TX | 7.25% | 2027-11-30 | Interest Only | $ | 42,500 | $ | 42,296 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Assisted living facilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oviedo, FL | 8.25% | 2025-07-31 | Interest Only | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Indianapolis, IN | 7.0% | 2022-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 6,423 | $ | 6,423 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wabash/Lafayette, IN | 7.0% | 2025-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 4,000 | $ | 3,873 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Entrance-fee communities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Columbia, SC | 7.25% | 2024-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 32,700 | $ | 32,700 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Construction Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canton, MI | 9.0% | 2023-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 14,700 | $ | 14,700 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Chesapeake, VA | 9.0% | 2025-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 14,200 | $ | 14,153 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fitchburg, WI | 8.50% | 2026-01-28 | Interest Only | $ | 28,525 | $ | 14,033 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sussex, WI | 8.50% | 2024-12-31 | Interest Only | $ | 22,200 | $ | 22,371 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 164,576 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2022, the tax basis of our mortgage loans on real estate was $180.1 million. Balloon payments on our interest only mortgage receivables are equivalent to the carrying amounts listed above except for unamortized commitment fees of $313.5 thousand.
See the notes to our consolidated financial statements for more information on our mortgage loan receivables.
126
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC. | |||||||||||||||||
| SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE | |||||||||||||||||
| FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021, AND 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of mortgage loans on real estate | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 230,927 | $ | 259,491 | $ | 294,120 | |||||||||||
| Additions: | |||||||||||||||||
| New mortgage loans | 67,978 | 33,160 | 55,059 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of loan discount and commitment fees | 907 | 741 | 806 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Additions | 68,885 | 33,901 | 55,865 | ||||||||||||||
| Deductions: | |||||||||||||||||
| Loan commitment fees received | 497 | — | 222 | ||||||||||||||
| Mortgage notes receivable related to investments in real estate | 23,071 | — | 63,220 | ||||||||||||||
| Collection of principal, less recoveries of previous write-downs | 111,668 | 62,465 | 27,052 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Deductions | 135,236 | 62,465 | 90,494 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 164,576 | $ | 230,927 | $ | 259,491 | |||||||||||
127