Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X BOX) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002

OR

(BOX) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to          

Commission File Number          

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
  77-0024666
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

4000 North First Street, San Jose, California  95134
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(408) 943-9700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

         YES (X BOX) NO (BOX)

As of July 31, 2002, 145,070,611 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, no par value, were issued and outstanding.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
Exhibit Index
EXHIBIT 10.1


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 29, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                         
                    Page
Part I: Financial Information        
        Item 1:  
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
       
               
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001
    3  
               
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 29, 2002 and December 31, 2001
    4  
               
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001
    5  
               
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
    6  
        Item 2:  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    13  
        Item 3:  
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
    23  
Part II: Other Information        
        Item 1:  
Legal Proceedings
    24  
        Item 4:  
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
    27  
        Item 5:  
Other Information
    27  
        Item 6:  
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
    28  
Signatures     28  

2


Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                     
        Three months ended   Six months ended
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   June 29,   June 30,   June 29,   June 30,
(unaudited)   2002   2001   2002   2001

Net sales
  $ 222,147     $ 376,899     $ 391,826     $ 835,604  
Cost of sales
    120,583       177,275       218,732       380,995  
 
 
Gross profit
    101,564       199,624       173,094       454,609  
Operating expenses:
                               
 
Selling, general, and administrative
    39,478       54,468       74,164       123,374  
 
Research and development
    58,727       72,707       112,773       143,198  
 
Special charges
                3,273       13,160  
 
Bad debt write-off (recovery)
                (7,662 )      
 
 
Total operating expenses
    98,205       127,175       182,548       279,732  
 
 
Operating income (loss)
    3,359       72,449       (9,454 )     174,877  
Interest and other income, net
    11,847       13,379       29,516       29,939  
 
 
Income before income taxes
    15,206       85,828       20,062       204,816  
Provision for income taxes
    3,193       26,607       4,213       63,493  
 
 
Net income
  $ 12,013     $ 59,221     $ 15,849     $ 141,323  
 
 
Net income per share:
                               
   
Basic net income per share
  $ 0.08     $ 0.42     $ 0.11     $ 1.00  
 
 
   
Diluted net income per share
  $ 0.08     $ 0.40     $ 0.11     $ 0.95  
 
 
Shares used in basic calculation
    145,120       142,267       144,687       141,638  
 
 
Shares used in diluted calculation
    151,053       149,643       150,838       148,876  
 
 

See accompanying notes.

3


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

                     
        June 29,   December 31,
(in thousands)   2002   2001 *

Assets
  (unaudited)        
Current assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 524,897     $ 550,640  
 
Short-term investments
    416,997       371,182  
 
Restricted short-term investments
    872,299       961,643  
 
Accounts receivable, net
    221,244       225,916  
 
Inventories
    251,362       244,712  
 
Deferred tax assets, net
    83,415       82,069  
 
Prepaid and other current assets
    59,158       81,049  
 
 
   
Total current assets
    2,429,372       2,517,211  
Property and equipment:
               
 
Machinery and equipment
    251,577       243,677  
 
Furniture and fixtures
    15,297       15,256  
 
Leasehold improvements
    79,882       79,264  
 
Land
    8,782       8,782  
 
 
 
    355,538       346,979  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    187,795       169,378  
 
 
 
    167,743       177,601  
Other assets
    91,773       70,177  
Note receivable
    397,429       244,673  
 
 
   
Total assets
  $ 3,086,317     $ 3,009,662  
 
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 95,520     $ 67,317  
 
Accrued payroll and related expenses
    25,057       34,211  
 
Accrued warranty
    35,796       43,337  
 
Other accrued liabilities
    33,066       30,411  
 
Restructuring accrual
    22,871       26,849  
 
Income taxes payable
    9,504       5,870  
 
Deferred profit
    51,528       40,835  
 
Current obligations under lines of credit
    17,927       26,179  
 
Convertible subordinated debentures
    862,953       862,659  
 
 
   
Total current liabilities
    1,154,222       1,137,668  
Shareholders’ equity:
               
 
Common stock
    1,329,303       1,273,201  
 
Retained earnings
    603,935       597,267  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (1,143 )     1,526  
 
 
   
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,932,095       1,871,994  
 
 
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 3,086,317     $ 3,009,662  
 
 

* Amounts as of December 31, 2001 are derived from the December 31, 2001 audited financial statements.

See accompanying notes.

4


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                       
          Six months ended
(in thousands)   June 29,   June 30,
(unaudited)   2002   2001

Cash flows from operating activities:
               
 
Net income
  $ 15,849     $ 141,323  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
 
Gain on sale of an investment
    (4,602 )      
 
Depreciation and amortization
    24,919       22,809  
 
Deferred income taxes
    (1,346 )     43,358  
 
Deferred compensation
    873       725  
 
Adjustment to conform fiscal year end of GaSonics
          1,714  
 
Income tax benefits from employee stock option plans
    16,942       24,311  
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
   
Accounts receivable
    4,672       102,006  
   
Inventories
    (6,313 )     (73,184 )
   
Prepaid and other current assets
    21,891       (32,553 )
   
Accounts payable
    28,203       (30,608 )
   
Accrued payroll and related expenses
    (9,154 )     (14,001 )
   
Accrued warranty
    (7,541 )     1,529  
   
Deferred profit
    10,693       (95,295 )
   
Other accrued liabilities
    (1,323 )     (6,178 )
   
Income taxes payable
    5,176       (49,920 )
 
 
     
Total adjustments
    83,090       (105,287 )
 
 
   
Net cash provided by operating activities
    98,939       36,036  
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
 
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of short-term investments
    380,313       1,073,177  
 
Purchases of short-term investments
    (425,289 )     (980,500 )
 
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of restricted short-term investments
    1,274,583        
 
Purchases of restricted short-term investments
    (1,186,362 )      
 
Capital expenditures
    (12,376 )     (49,355 )
 
Decrease in other assets
    1,052       555  
 
Participation in synthetic leases
    (177,457 )      
 
 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (145,536 )     43,877  
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
 
Proceeds from employee stock option plans
    41,750       33,155  
 
Proceeds from (payments on) lines of credit, net
    (8,252 )     5,945  
 
Repurchase of common stock
    (12,644 )      
 
 
   
Net cash provided by financing activities
    20,854       39,100  
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (25,743 )     119,013  
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
    550,640       589,415  
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
  $ 524,897     $ 708,428  
 
 

See accompanying notes.

5


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Novellus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

On January 10, 2001, Novellus merged with GaSonics International Corporation (“GaSonics”). The merger was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests transaction in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In the transaction, Novellus acquired all outstanding shares of GaSonics in a stock-for-stock merger, with all outstanding shares of GaSonics capital stock converted into approximately 9,240,000 shares of Novellus common stock. In addition, all outstanding options to purchase shares of GaSonics capital stock were automatically converted into options to purchase approximately 1,400,000 shares of Novellus common stock. Merger related expenses of approximately $13.2 million were recorded in the first quarter of 2001 and were included in special charges within the statement of operations.

Novellus adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, (“SFAS 142”) “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the first quarter of 2002. SFAS 142 discontinues amortization of goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives and requires such assets to be reviewed at least annually for impairment. SFAS 142 also includes provisions on the identification of intangible assets, reclassification of certain intangibles from previously reported goodwill, and reassessment of the useful lives of existing intangibles. As of January 1, 2002, Novellus had a goodwill balance of approximately $20.1 million. Consequently upon adoption, the application of the non-amortization provisions of SFAS 142 resulted in an increase in pre-tax operating income of $0.9 million and $1.8 million, in the three and six months ended June 29, 2002, respectively. If Novellus had adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 in the first quarter of 2001, the increase in pre-tax operating income would have been $0.9 million and $1.8 million, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. Novellus would have recorded earnings per share, on a diluted basis, $0.40 and $0.96 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. In the first quarter of 2002, Novellus conducted a test for impairment of its goodwill using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS 142. The first step identifies when impairment may have occurred, while the second step measures the amount of the impairment, if any. The conclusion of the test was that the Company’s goodwill assets were not impaired.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires Novellus to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Novellus evaluates its estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, investments, deferred tax assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, and contingencies and litigation. Novellus bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Novellus believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Novellus recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and “SAB 101: Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements-Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” (“SAB 101 FAQ”). Novellus recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has

6


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain of Novellus’ product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. If Novellus has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with both the customer and the specific type of equipment, then Novellus recognizes equipment revenue upon shipment and transfer of title, with the remainder when it becomes due (generally upon acceptance). All other equipment sales are recognized upon customer acceptance. Revenue related to spare part sales is recognized on shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts. Unearned maintenance and service contract revenue is not significant and is included in other accrued liabilities.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Novellus evaluates its allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where Novellus is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, Novellus records a specific allowance for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount Novellus reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, Novellus recognizes a reserve for bad debts based on a certain percentage of total revenues, which is based on Novellus’ historical experience over five years. If circumstances change (e.g. higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), Novellus may amend its estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to Novellus.

Inventory Reserves

Novellus assesses the recoverability of all inventory, including work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required. Inventory which is obsolete or in excess of Novellus’ forecasted usage is written down to its estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand is lower than the Company’s forecast, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Warranty and Installation

Novellus’ warranty and installation policy generally states that Novellus will provide installation services as well as warranty coverage, for a predetermined amount of time, on systems and modules for material and labor to repair and service the equipment. Novellus records the estimated cost of warranty coverage and installation upon system shipment. The estimated cost of warranty and installation coverage is determined by the warranty term as well as the average historical warranty and installation expense for a specific tool. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or installation costs differ from Novellus’ estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty and installation liability may be required.

Investments

Novellus classifies its marketable securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains and losses included, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses and declines in value of securities judged to be other than temporary are included in other income. Interest on all securities is included in interest income. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring impairment charges in the future. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices if available. If quoted market prices are not available, investments are estimated using discounted cash flows and market interest rates.

Deferred Tax Assets

Novellus records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While Novellus has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in

7


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event Novellus determined that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should Novellus determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would decrease income in the period such determination was made.

Restructuring

Novellus accounts for the need to record restructuring charges in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring),” EITF 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination” and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges.” In accordance with this guidance, management must execute an exit plan that will result in the incurrence of costs that have no future economic benefit. Also under the terms of EITF 94-3, a liability for the restructuring charges is recognized in the period management approves the restructuring plan. In the third quarter of 2001, Novellus established restructuring reserves for its operations. In the first quarter of 2002, Novellus had a reduction in force, which required reserves for severance benefits. These reserves required the use of estimates. Though Novellus believes that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of these plans, actual results may be different. See Note 8 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contingencies and Litigation

Novellus makes an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. Novellus would accrue the cost of an adverse judgment if, in Novellus’ estimation, the adverse settlement is probable and Novellus can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost to Novellus. Novellus has made no such accruals at June 29, 2002.

2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 143 to be material to its financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and provides a single accounting model for impairment of long-lived assets. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material effect on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” For most companies, SFAS 145 will require gains and losses

8


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required under SFAS 4. Extraordinary treatment will be required for certain extinguishments as provided in APB Opinion No. 30. The statement also amended SFAS 13 for certain sales-leaseback transactions and sublease accounting. Novellus is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 145 effective January 1, 2003. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 145 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” and must be applied beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when the exit or disposal plan is approved. Novellus is currently evaluating the impact of this adoption.

3. INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

                   
      June 29,   December 31,
      2002   2001
 
 
Purchased and spare parts
  $ 198,290     $ 199,702  
Work-in-process
    46,169       42,717  
Finished goods
    6,903       2,293  
 
 
 
Total inventory
  $ 251,362     $ 244,712  
 
 

4. LINES OF CREDIT

As of June 29, 2002, Novellus has lines of credit with four Japanese banks, which expire at various dates through October 2002, under which Novellus can borrow up to $30.2 million at the banks’ prime rates (ranging from 0.46% to 0.50%) as of June 29, 2002. These facilities are available to Novellus’ Japanese subsidiary, Novellus Systems, Japan. At June 29, 2002 and December 31, 2001, amounts outstanding were $17.9 million and $26.2 million, respectively, at annual weighted-average interest rates of 0.48% and 0.62%, respectively. All borrowings under the lines of credit were by Novellus Systems, Japan.

5. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income per share is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128. Basic net income per share excludes the dilutive effect of employee stock options. Diluted net income per share includes the dilutive effect of employee stock options. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

                                     
        Three months ended   Six months ended
        June 29,   June 30,   June 29,   June 30,
        2002   2001   2002   2001
 
 
Numerator:
                               
 
Net income
  $ 12,013     $ 59,221     $ 15,849     $ 141,323  
 
 
Denominator:
                               
 
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
    145,120       142,267       144,687       141,638  
 
Employee stock options
    5,933       7,376       6,151       7,238  
 
 
   
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
    151,053       149,643       150,838       148,876  
 
 
Basic net income per share
  $ 0.08     $ 0.42     $ 0.11     $ 1.00  
 
 
Diluted net income per share
  $ 0.08     $ 0.40     $ 0.11     $ 0.95  
 
 

9


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

6. COMMITMENTS

Novellus leases nearly all of its facilities under operating leases, including synthetic leases, which expire at various dates through 2010. A synthetic lease is a form of operating lease whereby a third party lessor funds 100% of the acquisition and construction costs relating to one or more properties to be leased to a lessee. The lessor is the owner of the leased property and must provide at least 3% of the required funds in the form of at-risk equity. The lessor generally borrows the balance of the funds necessary to fund the acquisition and construction. Under certain of Novellus’ synthetic lease agreements, Novellus is obligated to lend approximately 87% of the cost of the leased asset to the lessor upon completion of construction. The leases with this requirement are known as defeased or self-funded transactions. Additionally, Novellus’ synthetic leases require the Company to maintain collateral for the benefit of the lessor.

Novellus holds synthetic lease agreements on properties in San Jose, California and Tualatin, Oregon. During the six months ended June 29, 2002, Novellus drew an additional $87.5 million against its available lease financing line for the Tualatin property for which construction was completed in May 2002 . There are no additional amounts available under the Tualatin lease facility. The total financing under the San Jose synthetic lease has not changed significantly since December 31, 2001.

Summary information regarding Novellus’ synthetic lease arrangements is as follows as of June 29, 2002 (currency amounts in thousands):

                                                 
Property   Number of   Total Lease   Novellus'   Net Lease   Collateral   Residual Value
Location   Properties   Financing   Participation   Financing   Value   Guarantee

 
 
 
                     
San Jose, CA
    13     $ 293,183     $ 257,042     $ 36,141     $ 36,141     $ 258,220  
Tualatin, OR
    1       163,241       140,387       22,854       22,854       140,387  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    14     $ 456,424     $ 397,429     $ 58,995     $ 58,995     $ 398,607  
 
 
 
 
 

7. CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

On July 26, 2001, Novellus issued $880.0 million of Liquid Yield Option™ Notes (“LYONs”) due July 26, 2031. The net proceeds after issuance costs (which will be amortized over 30 years) from the LYONs offering were $862.4 million. The LYONs are zero coupon, zero-yield subordinated debentures that may be converted into shares of Novellus common stock, subject to specified conditions as set forth in the indenture. The LYONs are convertible into 13.09504 shares of Novellus common stock per $1,000 LYON, or 11.5 million shares and 7.9% of all outstanding shares as of June 29, 2002, if (1) the sales price of Novellus common stock reaches a specified threshold, (2) the LYONs are called for redemption, or (3) specified corporate transactions have occurred, subject to antidilutive adjustments.

On July 26, 2002, the security holders had the option to deliver the LYONs to Novellus and to require Novellus to repurchase the LYONs for $1,000 in cash each, up to a maximum of $880.0 million for all outstanding LYONs. Additionally, security holders also have the option to require Novellus to repurchase the LYONs on July 26, 2006, 2011, 2016, 2021, and 2026. On those repurchase dates in 2006 and thereafter, Novellus has the ability to determine whether the repurchase of the LYONs will be for cash or common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.

Novellus deposited U.S. treasury securities into a pledge account to secure Novellus’ obligations under the LYONs until July 26, 2002. These securities are reflected on Novellus’ balance sheet as restricted short-term investments.

On July 26, 2002, the security holders exercised their option to deliver the LYONs to Novellus and required Novellus to repurchase the LYONs for $1,000 in cash each on such date, representing $880.0 million for substantially all outstanding LYONs. Novellus used the restricted short-term investments discussed above, which had matured to $880.0 million, to repurchase the LYONs. Novellus will record a charge in July 2002 of approximately $17.0 million to other expense for the remaining unamortized issuance costs related to the LYONs.

10


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

8. SPECIAL CHARGES

Reduction in Force

In the first quarter of 2002, Novellus reduced its workforce in response to market conditions. Novellus recorded a special charge of $3.3 million, primarily for the cost of severance compensation. As of June 29, 2002, all severance benefits related to the reduction in workforce had been paid.

Merger-Related Expense

During the first quarter of 2001, Novellus incurred merger costs related to the acquisition of GaSonics of $13.2 million. These costs included professional fees, financial printing, and other related costs. Additionally, these costs included charges related to the cancellation of various contracts and the write-off of certain redundant assets. As of June 29, 2002, all expenses related to these accruals had been paid.

Restructuring

In September 2001, Novellus announced its intention to restructure its operations, which was driven by the decline in Novellus’ orders due to the contraction of the semiconductor capital equipment market from calendar year 2000 levels. During the third quarter of 2001, the restructuring plan was approved by the appropriate level of management necessary to commit Novellus to its specific actions. Novellus began implementing the plan during the third quarter of 2001 and recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges totaling $55.0 million, of which $47.9 million was included in operating expenses and $7.1 million was included in cost of sales. The restructuring charges included $33.8 million related to vacated facilities, $9.5 million related to abandoned assets associated with the discontinuation of certain projects, and $4.6 million related to the write-off of purchased technology. Additionally, the discontinuation of certain projects resulted in $7.1 million of inventory write-downs, which were included in cost of sales.

Below is a table summarizing activity relating to the September 2001 Plan (in thousands):

                                                   
                      Write-off of                        
      Vacated   Abandoned   Purchased           Discontinued        
      Facilities   Assets   Technology   Subtotal   Inventory   Total Restructure
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001
  $ 26,849     $     $     $ 26,849     $     $ 26,849  
 
Cash payments
    (3,978 )                 (3,978 )           (3,978 )
 
 
Balance at June 29, 2002
  $ 22,871     $     $     $ 22,871     $     $ 22,871  
 
 

The charge for vacated facilities was related to rent obligations after the abandonment of certain facilities currently under long-term operating lease agreements. When applicable, anticipated future sublease income relating to vacated buildings was offset against the charge for the remaining lease payments. All leasehold improvements relating to the vacated buildings with no future economic benefit were abandoned. Additionally, certain fixed assets associated with these facilities had no future economic benefit and were written off.

The charge for abandoned assets and discontinued inventory were associated with programs exited by Novellus. The write-off of purchased technology was related to technology that was abandoned by Novellus.

As of June 29, 2002, significantly all actions under the restructuring plan have been achieved except for future rent obligations related to vacated facilities. The remaining $22.9 million balance of the restructuring accrual is for future rent obligations which are to be paid in cash over the next five years.

11


Table of Contents

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

9. BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF (RECOVERY)

In September 2001, Novellus determined that due to the financial difficulties facing one of its customers, an outstanding accounts receivable balance was at risk for collection. Accordingly, Novellus recorded a write-off of $7.7 million. In the first quarter of 2002, all amounts under this accounts receivable balance were paid, resulting in a recovery of $7.7 million.

10. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):

                                   
      Three months ended   Six months ended
      June 29,   June 30,   June 29,   June 30,
      2002   2001   2002   2001
 
 
Net income
  $ 12,013     $ 59,221     $ 15,849     $ 141,323  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    2,475       (1,391 )     675       820  
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
    579       2,991       292       8,317  
Reclassification adjustment for a realized gain on an available-for-sale investment included in net income, net of tax
                (3,636 )      
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income
  $ 15,067     $ 60,821     $ 13,180     $ 150,460  
 
 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of related tax, are as follows (in thousands):

                   
      June 29,   December 31,
      2002   2001
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
  $ (1,500 )   $ (2,175 )
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
    357       3,701  
 
 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (1,143 )   $ 1,526  
 
 

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the second quarter of 2002, Novellus leased an aircraft from a third-party entity wholly owned by Richard S. Hill, Novellus’ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the aircraft lease agreement with the third-party entity wholly owned by Mr. Hill, Novellus incurred lease expense of approximately $58,000 through June 29, 2002. Novellus believes that the amount billed for use of the aircraft is within the range charged by third-party commercial charter companies for a similar type of aircraft.

A member of Novellus’ board of directors also serves on the board of directors of one of Novellus’ customers and therefore, this customer is considered a related party. This related-party customer represented 12% and 16% of net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002, respectively. This related-party customer represented 20% and 17% of net sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On August 12, 2002, Novellus entered into a definitive agreement to acquire SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc., a global supplier of chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) systems used in the fabrication of advanced copper interconnects. Novellus will acquire all outstanding shares of SpeedFam-IPEC in a stock-for-stock merger and will assume all of SpeedFam-IPEC's 6 1/4 percent Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004, totaling $115 million. Together with the purchase of stock and the assumption of net debt, the transaction is valued at approximately $220 million. If the merger is completed, SpeedFam-IPEC will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novellus, and each outstanding share of SpeedFam-IPEC common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.1818 of a share of Novellus common stock on a fixed-exchange ratio basis. The merger will be accounted for as a purchase transaction and is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under IRS regulations. The transaction has been approved by the board of directors of both companies and is expected to formally close in the fourth calendar quarter of 2002, subject to certain closing conditions, including SpeedFam-IPEC shareholder approval. Novellus shareholder approval is not required.

13. LITIGATION

For a discussion of legal matters, see Part II: Other Information, Item 1: Legal Proceedings.

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements included in this Quarterly Report, other than statements that are purely historical, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, and similar expressions also identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report include, without limitation: Novellus’ continued belief that significant investment in R&D is required to remain competitive and its plans to continue to invest in new products; Novellus’ expectations regarding the effect of the adoption of SFAS 143, 144, 145 and 146 on its financial condition or results of operations; Novellus’ expectations regarding its acquisition of SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc., including the transaction’s anticipated closing date and that the acquisition will be accretive to the Company’s earnings on a per-share basis by the third calendar quarter of 2003; Novellus’ belief that it would exercise its purchase option under the terms of the synthetic leases if the final Statement regarding the treatment of the assets associated with Novellus’ synthetic leases by FASB is consistent with Novellus’ interpretation of the Exposure Draft (“ED”), “Consolidation of Certain Special-Purpose Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”, and the Company’s expectation that the adoption of the ED would not have an impact on its liquidity; Novellus’ expectations regarding investments in property and equipment in fiscal 2002; Novellus’ belief that its current cash position, cash generated through operations and equity offerings, and available borrowings will be sufficient to meet Novellus’ needs through the next twelve months; Novellus’ beliefs that the ultimate outcome of the Applied Materials, Semitool, Plasma Physics, and Linear Technology litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations; and Novellus’ beliefs and expectations with respect to the outcomes of the Applied Materials, Semitool, Plasma Physics, and Linear Technology litigation matters and current patent infringement inquiries.

Novellus’ expectations, beliefs, objectives, anticipations, intentions and strategies regarding the future, expected operating results, revenues and earnings and current and potential litigation, or set forth in the other forward-looking statements found herein, are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, the current downturn in the U.S. economy, continued customer capital spending reductions in the semiconductor industry; further periodic downturns in the semiconductor industry which could have a material adverse effect on the semiconductor industry’s demand for semiconductor processing equipment, the greater financial, marketing, technical or other resources, broader product lines, and more established customer bases that some of Novellus’ competitors possess, future competition from new market entrants, improvement of the design and performance of Novellus’ competitors’ products, Novellus’ success in selecting, developing, and marketing new products, or enhancing existing products, its ability to enforce its patents and the inherent uncertainty in the outcome of litigation matters, the availability of raw materials and critical manufacturing equipment, and risks associated with regulatory and trade environments.

All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are based on information available to Novellus on the date hereof, and Novellus assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. You should also consult the cautionary statements and risk factors listed in Trends, Risks and Uncertainties beginning on page 19 of this Report as the cautionary statements and risk factors listed from time to time in this Report as well as Novellus’ Reports on Forms 10-Q, 8-K, 10-K, and its Annual Reports to Shareholders, including Novellus’ most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Novellus’ discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon Novellus’ condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires Novellus to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Novellus evaluates its estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, investments, deferred tax assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, and contingencies and litigation. Novellus bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

13


Table of Contents

Novellus believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Novellus recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and “SAB 101: Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements-Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” (“SAB 101 FAQ”). Novellus recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain of Novellus’ product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. If Novellus has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with both the customer and the specific type of equipment, then Novellus recognizes equipment revenue upon shipment and transfer of title, with the remainder when it becomes due (generally upon acceptance). All other equipment sales are recognized upon customer acceptance. Revenue related to spare part sales is recognized on shipment. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts. Unearned maintenance and service contract revenue is not significant and is included in other accrued liabilities.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Novellus evaluates its allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where Novellus is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, Novellus records a specific allowance for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount Novellus reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, Novellus recognizes a reserve for bad debts based on a certain percentage of total revenues, which is based on Novellus’ historical experience over five years. If circumstances change (e.g. higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), Novellus may amend its estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to Novellus.

Inventory Reserves

Novellus assesses the recoverability of all inventory, including work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required. Inventory which is obsolete or in excess of Novellus’ forecasted usage is written down to its estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand is lower than the Company’s forecast, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Warranty and Installation

Novellus’ warranty and installation policy generally states that Novellus will provide installation services as well as warranty coverage, for a predetermined amount of time, on systems and modules for material and labor to repair and service the equipment. Novellus records the estimated cost of warranty coverage and installation upon system shipment. The estimated cost of warranty and installation coverage is determined by the warranty term as well as the average historical warranty and installation expense for a specific tool. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or installation costs differ from Novellus’ estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty and installation liability may be required.

Investments

Novellus classifies its marketable securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains and losses included, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses and declines in value of securities judged to be other than temporary are included in other income. Interest on all securities is included in interest income. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring impairment charges in the future. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices if available. If quoted market prices are not available, investments are estimated using discounted cash flows and market interest rates.

14


Table of Contents

Deferred Tax Assets

Novellus records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While Novellus has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event Novellus determined that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should Novellus determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would decrease income in the period such determination was made.

Restructuring

Novellus accounts for the need to record restructuring charges in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring),” EITF 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination” and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges.” In accordance with this guidance, management must execute an exit plan that will result in the incurrence of costs that have no future economic benefit. Also under the terms of EITF 94-3, a liability for the restructuring charges is recognized in the period management approves the restructuring plan. In the third quarter of 2001, Novellus established restructuring reserves for its operations. In the first quarter of 2002, Novellus had a reduction in force, which required reserves for severance benefits. These reserves required the use of estimates. Though Novellus believes that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of these plans, actual results may be different. See Note 8 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contingencies and Litigation

Novellus makes an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. Novellus would accrue the cost of an adverse judgment if, in Novellus’ estimation, the adverse settlement is probable and Novellus can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost to Novellus. Novellus has made no such accruals at June 29, 2002.

Novellus’ critical accounting policies are also discussed in the Novellus Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 1 to the Novellus Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2001.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 were $222.1 million and $391.8 million, respectively. Net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 were $376.9 million and $835.6 million, respectively. Net sales were $169.7 million in the quarter ended March 30, 2002. The decrease in net sales over the comparable year-ago periods is primarily due to customer capital spending reductions in response to slowing worldwide demand for semiconductors. The increase in net sales over the immediately preceding quarter is primarily due to improving market conditions and higher revenue associated with sales of Novellus’ dielectric high-density plasma (HDP) and dielectric plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) tools.

15


Table of Contents

International net sales (including export sales) for both the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 were 76% and 66% of total net sales, as compared to 56% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, and 54% in the immediately preceding quarter. The increase from the comparable year-ago periods is primarily a result of a higher proportional decrease in net sales in North America. The increase from the immediately preceding quarter is primarily due to higher sales in the Pacific Rim.

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was 46% and 44%, compared with 53% and 54%, respectively, for the comparable year-ago periods. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from 42% in the immediately preceding quarter. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales from the comparable year-ago periods is due to reduced absorption of fixed overhead costs resulting from lower shipments and from lower gross margins on Novellus’ 300mm systems, which have higher costs as they are not yet in high volume production. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales from the immediately preceding quarter is primarily due to improving margins on the 300mm systems and improved absorption of fixed overhead costs due to increased shipments.

Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expense for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was $39.5 million and $74.2 million compared with $54.5 million and $123.4 million in the comparable year-ago periods and $34.7 million in the immediately preceding quarter. SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was 18% and 19% compared with 14% and 15% for the comparable year-ago periods and 20% for the immediately preceding quarter. The increase in SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales versus the comparable year-ago periods is primarily due to a substantial reduction in net sales associated with the decline in customer capital spending. The decrease in SG&A expense in absolute dollars from the comparable year-ago periods is primarily due to the impact of cost reduction measures implemented in the second half of 2001, including travel, workforce reductions, executive and employee pay reductions and facilities consolidation. The increase in SG&A expense in absolute dollars from the immediately preceding quarter was primarily due to the reinstatement of salaries from the previous year’s wage reductions, higher selling costs due to increased shipments, and an increase in travel due to the improved market conditions from the immediately preceding quarter.

Research and development (R&D) expense for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was $58.7 million and $112.8 million compared with $72.7 million and $143.2 million for the comparable year-ago periods and $54.0 million in the immediately preceding quarter. R&D expense as a percentage of net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was 26% and 29% compared with 19% and 17% for the comparable year-ago periods and 32% for the immediately preceding quarter. The increase in R&D expense as a percentage of net sales versus the comparable year-ago periods is primarily due to a substantial reduction in net sales associated with the decline in customer capital spending. The decrease in R&D expense in absolute dollars over the comparable year-ago periods is primarily due to workforce reductions, pay reductions, and facilities consolidations and other cost containment efforts aimed at focusing Novellus’ R&D efforts on key products necessary for long-term growth. The increase in R&D expense from the immediately preceding quarter is due to the reinstatement of salaries from the previous year’s wage reductions and increased infrastructure costs. Novellus continues to believe that significant investment in R&D is required to remain competitive and plans to continue to invest in new products.

In the first quarter of 2002, Novellus reduced its workforce in response to market conditions. Novellus recorded a special charge of $3.3 million, primarily for the cost of severance compensation. As of June 29, 2002, all severance benefits related to the reduction in workforce had been paid.

During the first quarter of 2001, Novellus incurred merger costs related to the acquisition of GaSonics of $13.2 million. These costs included professional fees, financial printing, and other related costs. Additionally, these costs included charges related to the cancellation of various contracts and the write-off of certain redundant assets. As of June 29, 2002, all expenses related to these accruals had been paid.

In September 2001, Novellus determined that due to the financial difficulties facing one of its customers, an outstanding accounts receivable balance was at risk for collection. Accordingly, Novellus recorded a write-off of $7.7 million. In the first quarter of 2002, all amounts under this accounts receivable balance were paid resulting in a benefit to operations of $7.7 million.

Other income, including interest income, for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was $11.8 million and $29.5 million compared with $13.4 million and $29.9 million for the comparable year-ago periods and $17.7 million in the immediately preceding quarter. The decrease in other income from the year-ago three month period is due to lower interest

16


Table of Contents

rates. The decrease in other income from the year-ago six month period and the immediately preceding quarter is due to lower interest rates offset by a $4.6 million gain on the sale of an investment recorded in the first quarter of 2002.

Novellus’ effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was 21% compared to 31% for the comparable year-ago periods. The decrease in the tax rate results from the tax benefit of the R&D credit and a reduction in the valuation allowance being proportionately greater in 2002 due to lower pretax income.

Net income for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was $12.0 million and $15.8 million or $0.08 and $0.11 per diluted share, compared with $59.2 million and $141.3 million or $0.40 and $0.95 per diluted share for the comparable year-ago periods and $3.8 million or $0.03 per diluted share for the immediately preceding quarter.

Excluding the $4.6 million gain on the sale of an investment, the $7.7 million benefit for the recovery of an account receivable which had been previously reserved, and a $3.3 million charge associated with a reduction in workforce recorded in the first quarter of 2002, Novellus recorded net income of $8.7 million for the six months ended June 29, 2002, or $0.06 per diluted share. Excluding merger costs related to the acquisition of GaSonics of $13.2 million recorded in the first quarter of 2001, Novellus recorded net income of $150.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, or $1.01 per diluted share.

The number of shares used in the per fully diluted share calculations for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 was 151.1 million and 150.8 million, respectively, compared with 149.6 million and 148.9 million for the comparable year-ago periods and 150.6 million in the immediately preceding quarter. The increase in shares used for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002 compared to the comparable year-ago periods and to the immediately preceding quarter is primarily due to shares issued under Novellus’ employee stock option plans.

During the second quarter of 2002, Novellus leased an aircraft from a third-party entity wholly owned by Richard S. Hill, Novellus’ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the aircraft lease agreement with the third-party entity wholly owned by Mr. Hill, Novellus incurred lease expense of approximately $58,000 through June 29, 2002. Novellus believes that the amount billed for use of the aircraft is within the range charged by third-party commercial charter companies for a similar type of aircraft.

A member of Novellus’ board of directors also serves on the board of directors of one of Novellus’ customers and therefore, this customer is considered a related party. This related-party customer represented 12% and 16% of net sales for the three and six months ended June 29, 2002, respectively. This related-party customer represented 20% and 17% of net sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively.

On August 12, 2002, Novellus entered into a definitive agreement to acquire SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc., a global supplier of chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) systems used in the fabrication of advanced copper interconnects. Novellus will acquire all outstanding shares of SpeedFam-IPEC in a stock-for-stock merger and will assume all of SpeedFam-IPEC's 6 1/4 percent Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004, totaling $115 million. Together with the purchase of stock and the assumption of net debt, the transaction is valued at approximately $220 million. If the merger is completed, SpeedFam-IPEC will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novellus, and each outstanding share of SpeedFam-IPEC common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.1818 of a share of Novellus common stock on a fixed-exchange ratio basis. The merger will be accounted for as a purchase transaction and is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under IRS regulations. The transaction has been approved by the board of directors of both companies and is expected to formally close in the fourth calendar quarter of 2002, subject to certain closing conditions, including SpeedFam-IPEC shareholder approval. Novellus shareholder approval is not required. The transaction is expected to be accretive to Novellus' earnings on a per-share basis by the third calendar quarter of 2003.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 143 to be material to its financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and provides a single accounting model for impairment of long-lived assets. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material effect on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” For most companies, SFAS 145 will require gains and losses on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required under SFAS 4. Extraordinary treatment will be required for certain extinguishments as provided in APB Opinion No. 30. The statement also amended SFAS 13 for certain sales-leaseback transactions and sublease accounting. Novellus is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 145 effective January 1, 2003. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 145 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue

17


Table of Contents

No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” and must be applied beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when the exit or disposal plan is approved. Novellus is currently evaluating the impact of this adoption.

In connection with their ongoing consolidations project, the FASB issued an exposure draft (“ED”), “Consolidation of Certain Special-Purpose Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” in June 2002 for public comment. The ED could substantially change the accounting for synthetic leases. The comment period on the ED will end on August 30, 2002, and the final guidance will become effective for Novellus in its second fiscal quarter of 2003. If the final Statement is consistent with the ED, and Novellus were required to consolidate its special purpose entity, Novellus believes that it would exercise its purchase option under the terms of the synthetic leases and purchase the leased assets thereunder. This treatment would result in Novellus recording the property and equipment purchase under the leases of approximately $456.4 million. Novellus’ lease receivable and cash collateral under the synthetic leases would be returned to Novellus as cash or used to offset the purchase price of the properties. As a result of the purchase, depreciation expense would increase by approximately $30.0 million to $35.0 million per year, and rent expense and interest income would each decrease by approximately $15.0 million per year based on current interest rates. Because this treatment would result in the lease receivable and cash collateral being returned to Novellus, the Company does not expect the adoption of the ED to have an impact on its liquidity.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Novellus has historically financed its operating and capital resource requirements through cash flows from operations, sales of equity securities, and borrowings. Novellus’ primary source of funds at June 29, 2002 consisted of $941.9 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. This amount represents an increase of $20.1 million from the December 31, 2001 balance of $921.8 million. Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 29, 2002 was $98.9 million. This amount consisted primarily of an increase in accounts payable of $28.2 million, a decrease in prepaids and other current assets of $21.9 million, and an income tax benefit from employee stock option plans of $16.9 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $145.5 million during the six months ended June 29, 2002. During this period, Novellus’ cash outflows consisted primarily of $43.2 million in net proceeds of both restricted short-term investments and short-term investments offset by Novellus’ participation in its synthetic leases of $177.5 million.

As of June 29, 2002, Novellus does not have any significant commitments to purchase property and equipment.

During the six months ended June 29, 2002, net cash provided by financing activities was $20.9 million due to $41.8 million from employee stock option plans, offset by $12.6 million of common stock repurchases and net payments of $8.3 million on its bank lines of credit.

Novellus leases nearly all of its facilities under operating leases, including synthetic leases, which expire at various dates through 2010. A synthetic lease is a form of operating lease whereby a third party lessor funds 100% of the acquisition and construction costs relating to one or more properties to be leased to a lessee. The lessor is the owner of the leased property and must provide at least 3% of the required funds in the form of at-risk equity. The lessor generally borrows the balance of the funds necessary to fund the acquisition and construction. Under certain of Novellus’ synthetic lease agreements, Novellus is obligated to lend approximately 87% of the cost of the leased asset to the lessor upon completion of construction. The leases with this requirement are known as defeased or self-funded transactions. Additionally, Novellus’ synthetic leases require the Company to maintain collateral for the benefit of the lessor. Novellus’ synthetic lease arrangements are discussed in greater detail in the Novellus Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 7 to the Novellus Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2001, provided that such discussion speaks only as of the date such Form 10-K was filed.

Novellus holds synthetic lease agreements on properties in San Jose, California and Tualatin, Oregon. During the six months ended June 29, 2002, Novellus drew an additional $87.5 million against its available lease financing line for the Tualatin

18


Table of Contents

property for which construction was completed in May 2002. There are no additional amounts available under the Tualatin lease facility. The total financing under the San Jose synthetic lease has not changed significantly since December 31, 2001.

As of June 29, 2002, Novellus has lines of credit with four Japanese banks, which expire at various dates through October 2002, under which Novellus can borrow up to $30.2 million at the banks’ prime rates (ranging from 0.46% to 0.50%) as of June 29, 2002. These facilities are available to Novellus’ Japanese subsidiary, Novellus Systems, Japan. At June 29, 2002 and December 31, 2001, amounts outstanding were $17.9 million and $26.2 million, respectively, at annual weighted-average interest rates of 0.48% and 0.62%, respectively. All borrowings under the lines of credit were by Novellus Systems, Japan.

On July 26, 2001, Novellus issued $880.0 million of Liquid Yield Option™ Notes (“LYONs”) due July 26, 2031. The net proceeds after issuance costs (which will be amortized over 30 years) from the LYONs offering were $862.4 million. The LYONs are zero coupon, zero-yield subordinated debentures that may be converted into shares of Novellus common stock, subject to specified conditions as set forth in the indenture. The LYONs are convertible into 13.09504 shares of Novellus common stock per $1,000 LYON, or 11.5 million shares and 7.9% of all outstanding shares as of June 29, 2002, if (1) the sales price of Novellus common stock reaches a specified threshold, (2) the LYONs are called for redemption, or (3) specified corporate transactions have occurred, subject to antidilutive adjustments.

On July 26, 2002, the security holders exercised their option to deliver the LYONs to Novellus and required Novellus to repurchase the LYONs for $1,000 in cash each on such date, representing $880.0 million for substantially all outstanding LYONs. Novellus used the restricted short-term investments, which had matured to $880.0 million, to repurchase the LYONs. Novellus will record a charge in July 2002 of approximately $17.0 million to other expense for the remaining unamortized issuance costs related to the LYONs. For further discussion, see Note 7 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report, “Convertible Subordinated Debentures.”

Related-party transaction disclosures are made by the Company when and if it issues loans to its executive officers and members of its board of directors. As of June 29, 2002, Novellus does not have any outstanding loans with these individuals. Novellus does, from time to time, issue secured, short-term relocation loans to the Company's management and key personnel, the issuance of which requires management's approval. As of June 29, 2002, these loans were approximately $5.3 million.

On August 12, 2002, Novellus entered into a definitive agreement to acquire SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc., a global supplier of chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) systems used in the fabrication of advanced mechanical copper interconnects. If the transaction closes, Novellus will assume all of SpeedFam-IPEC’s 6 1/4 percent Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004, totaling $115 million.

Novellus believes that its current cash position, cash generated through operations and equity offerings, and available borrowings will be sufficient to meet Novellus’ needs through the next twelve months.

TRENDS, RISKS, AND UNCERTAINTIES

Set forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 13 of this Report, and in other documents Novellus files with the Securities and Exchange Commission are trends, risks and uncertainties that could cause Novellus’ actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. As noted, these trends, risks, and uncertainties are discussed below.

Market Risk and Cyclical Downturns in the Semiconductor Industry

Novellus’ business depends predominantly on capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn depends on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing integrated circuits. The semiconductor industry has historically been very cyclical and has experienced periodic downturns, which have had a material adverse effect on the semiconductor industry’s demand for semiconductor processing equipment, including equipment manufactured and marketed by Novellus. During periods of reduced and declining demand, Novellus must be able to quickly and effectively align its cost structure with prevailing market conditions, and motivate and retain key employees. In particular, during a period of reduced demand, Novellus’ inventory levels have in the past reached and currently are at higher than necessary levels for the current levels of production demand. No assurance can be given that Novellus may not be required to make inventory valuation adjustments in future periods. During periods of rapid growth, Novellus must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and hire and assimilate a sufficient number of qualified people. No assurance can be given that Novellus’ net sales and operating results will not be adversely affected if this current downturn in the semiconductor industry continues or other downturns or slowdowns in the rate of capital investment in the semiconductor industry occur in the future.

Demand Shifts in the PC Industry

In the PC market, a shift in demand from more expensive, high-performance products to lower-priced products (sub-$1,000 PCs) has resulted in reduced profitability for semiconductor manufacturers. Strengthening demand for sub-$1,000 PCs could cause further delays or decreased demand for Novellus’ products.

19


Table of Contents

Intense Competition in the Semiconductor Equipment Industry

The semiconductor equipment industry is highly competitive. Novellus faces substantial competition in the markets in which it competes from both established competitors and potential new entrants. Certain of Novellus’ competitors have greater financial, marketing, technical or other resources, broader product lines, greater customer service capabilities, and larger and more established sales organizations and customer bases than Novellus. Novellus may also face future competition from new market entrants from overseas and domestic sources. Novellus expects its competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their products. There can be no assurance that Novellus’ competitors will not develop enhancements to or future generations of competitive products that will offer superior price or performance features over Novellus’ products, and there can be no assurance that Novellus will be successful, or as successful as its competitors, in selecting, developing, manufacturing, and marketing its new products, or enhancing its existing products. Failure to successfully develop new products could materially adversely affect Novellus’ revenues, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, a substantial investment is required by Novellus’ customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a semiconductor production line. As a result, once a semiconductor manufacturer has selected another vendor’s capital equipment, Novellus believes that the manufacturer will be generally reliant upon that equipment vendor for the specific production line application. Accordingly, Novellus may experience difficulty in selling a product to a particular customer for a significant period of time if that customer first selects a competitor’s product. Increased competitive pressure could lead to lower prices for Novellus’ products, thereby adversely affecting Novellus’ revenue and operating results. There can be no assurance that Novellus will be able to compete successfully against established competitors and new entrants in the future.

International Operations

Novellus anticipates that export sales will account for a significant portion of net sales in the foreseeable future. As a result, a significant portion of Novellus’ sales will be subject to certain risks, including tariffs and other barriers, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations, difficulties in managing distributors, potentially adverse tax consequences and the possibility of difficulty in accounts receivable collection. Novellus is also subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of semiconductor products. Novellus cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes, or other charges or restrictions will be implemented by the United States or any other country upon the importation or exportation of Novellus’ products in the future. There can be no assurance that any of these factors or the adoption of restrictive policies will not have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations. Moreover, each region in the global semiconductor equipment market exhibits unique characteristics that can cause capital equipment investment patterns to vary significantly from period to period. Although international markets provide Novellus with significant growth opportunities, periodic economic downturns, trade balance issues, political instability and fluctuations in interest and foreign currency exchange rates are all risks that could materially and adversely affect global products and service demand, and, therefore, Novellus’ business operations and financial condition. Asian countries, particularly Japan and Korea, are affected by banking, currency and other difficulties that contribute to the economic developments in those countries. Novellus derives a substantial portion of its revenues from customers in Asian countries. Any negative economic developments of Asian countries could result in the cancellation or delay of orders for Novellus’ products from Asian customers, thus materially adversely affecting Novellus’ business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition to the concerns described above, sales of systems shipped by Novellus’ Japanese subsidiary are denominated in Japanese Yen. Novellus sells the systems to its Japanese subsidiary in U.S. Dollars. Novellus then enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations of intercompany accounts payable denominated in U.S. Dollars recorded by the Japanese subsidiary in order to manage this exposure. However, there can be no assurance that future changes in the Japanese Yen will not have a material effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Possible Volatility of Stock Price

The price of Novellus’ common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations and possible rapid increases or declines in a short time period. These fluctuations may be due to factors specific to Novellus such as variations in quarterly operating results or changes in analysts’ earnings estimates, or to factors relating to the semiconductor industry or to the securities markets in general, which, in recent years, have experienced significant price fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stocks are traded. Shareholders should be willing to incur the risk of such fluctuations. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public market after any offering of Novellus’ securities could adversely affect the market price of the outstanding common stock.

20


Table of Contents

Variability of Quarterly Operating Results

If Novellus’ operating results are below the expectations of public market analysts or investors, then the market price of its common stock could decline. Novellus has experienced and expects to continue to experience significant fluctuations in its quarterly operating results. During each quarter, Novellus customarily sells a relatively small number of systems that typically sell for prices in excess of $1 million. Novellus’ backlog at the beginning of each quarter does not necessarily include all system sales needed to achieve expected net sales for that quarter. Consequently, Novellus is often dependent on obtaining orders for shipment in the same quarter that the order is received. Because Novellus builds its systems according to forecast, the absence of significant backlog for an extended period of time could hinder Novellus’ ability to plan production and inventory levels, which could adversely affect operating results. Novellus’ net sales and operating results could also be adversely affected for a particular quarter if an anticipated order for even a few systems is not received in time to permit shipment during that quarter. Moreover, customers may reschedule or cancel shipments, with, in the case of cancellations, little or no penalties, and production difficulties could delay shipments. A delay in a shipment in any quarter, due, for example, to an unanticipated shipment rescheduling, to cancellations by customers, or to unexpected manufacturing difficulties experienced by Novellus, may cause net sales in such quarter to fall significantly below expectations and may materially adversely affect Novellus’ operating results for such quarter. The timing of new product announcements and releases by Novellus may also contribute to fluctuations in quarterly operating results, particularly in cases where new product offerings cause customers to defer ordering products from Novellus’ existing product lines. Novellus’ results of operations also could be affected by new product announcements and releases by Novellus’ competitors, the volume, mix and timing of orders received during a period, availability and pricing of key components, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, and conditions in the semiconductor equipment industry. Novellus’ operating results also fluctuate based on gross profit realized on system sales. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales may vary based on a variety of factors, including the mix and average selling prices of products sold and costs to manufacture upgrades and customize systems. Because Novellus’ operating expenses are based on anticipated net sales levels, and a high percentage of those expenses are relatively fixed, a variation in the timing of recognition of net sales and the level of gross profit from a single transaction can cause material variations in operating results from quarter to quarter.

Benefits of Novellus’ Acquisition of GaSonics May Not Be Realized

The integration of Novellus and GaSonics is not fully complete and continues to be a complex, time consuming, and expensive process. The challenges involved in this integration include the following: satisfying the needs of the combined company’s customers in a timely and efficient manner and maintaining GaSonics’ and Novellus’ key customer relationships; persuading employees that Novellus’ and GaSonics’ business cultures are compatible and retaining the combined company’s key management, marketing, customer support, and technical personnel; maintaining management’s ability to focus on anticipating, responding to or utilizing changing technologies in the semiconductor industry; combining GaSonics’ product offerings and technologies with Novellus’ product offerings and technologies effectively and quickly and coordinating research and development activities to enhance introduction of new products and technologies; maintaining GaSonics’ key supplier relationships; and the introduction of new technologies by competitors to the marketplace which reduce GaSonics’ market share prior to the successful integration of the two companies. It is not certain that Novellus and GaSonics can be successfully integrated in a timely manner or at all or that any of the anticipated benefits will be realized. Failure to do so could materially harm the business and operating results of the combined company. Also, neither Novellus nor GaSonics can assure that the growth rate of the combined company will equal the historical growth rates experienced by Novellus and GaSonics.

A Large Portion of Novellus’ Net Sales Is Derived from Sales to a Few Customers

Historically, Novellus has sold a significant proportion of its systems in any particular period to a limited number of customers. Sales to Novellus’ ten largest customers in the six months ended June 29, 2002 and in fiscal year 2001 accounted for 84% and 71% of net sales, respectively. Novellus expects that sales of its products to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its net sales in the foreseeable future. None of Novellus’ customers have entered into a long-term agreement requiring them to purchase Novellus’ products. Novellus believes that sales to certain of its customers will decrease in the near future as those customers complete current purchasing requirements for new or expanded fabrication facilities. Although the composition of the group comprising Novellus’ largest customers has varied from year to year, the loss of a significant customer or any reduction in orders from any significant customer, including reductions due to customer departures from recent buying patterns, market, economic or competitive conditions in the semiconductor industry or in the industries that manufacture products utilizing integrated circuits, could adversely affect Novellus’ business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, sales of Novellus’ systems depend in significant part upon the decision of a

21


Table of Contents

prospective customer to increase manufacturing capacity or to expand current manufacturing capacity, both of which typically involve a significant capital commitment. Novellus has from time to time experienced delays in finalizing system sales following initial system qualification. Due to these and other factors, Novellus’ systems typically have a lengthy sales cycle during which Novellus may expend substantial funds and management effort with no guarantee that Novellus will sell a particular system.

Novellus’ Industry Is Characterized by Rapidly Changing Technology

The semiconductor manufacturing industry is subject to rapid technological change and new product introductions and enhancements. Novellus’ ability to remain competitive in this market depends in part upon Novellus’ ability to develop new and enhanced systems and to introduce these systems at competitive prices and on a timely and cost-effective basis. Accordingly, Novellus devotes a significant portion of its personnel and financial resources to research and development programs and seeks to maintain close relationships with its customers to remain responsive to their product needs. Novellus’ current research and development efforts are directed at the development of new systems and processes and improving existing system capabilities. Novellus is focusing its research and development efforts on additional Concept Two modules, advanced PVD systems, advanced gap fill technology, primary conductor metals, low-K dielectric materials and additional advanced technologies for the next generation of smaller geometry fabrication lines, as well as equipment to process 300mm wafers. There is no assurance that Novellus’ research and development programs will allow Novellus to remain responsive to its customers’ product needs or that Novellus’ current or new customers will buy its new products.

Research and Development Expenditures Represent a Substantial Portion of Novellus’ Net Sales

Novellus’ expenditures for research and development during the six months ended June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001, were $74.2 million and $123.4 million, respectively, or approximately 19% and 15% of net sales. Novellus’ success in developing, introducing and selling new and enhanced systems depends upon a variety of factors, including product selection, timely and efficient completion of product design and development, timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing and assembly processes, product performance in the field and effective sales and marketing. There can be no assurance that Novellus will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or in enhancing its existing products. As is typical in the semiconductor capital equipment market, Novellus has experienced delays from time to time in the introduction of, and certain technical and manufacturing difficulties with, certain of its systems and enhancements and may experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of new systems or enhancements. Novellus’ inability to complete the development or meet the technical specifications of any of its new systems or enhancements or to manufacture and ship these systems or enhancements in volume in a timely manner would materially adversely affect Novellus’ business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, Novellus may incur substantial unanticipated costs to ensure the functionality and reliability of its future product introductions early in the product’s life cycle. If new products have reliability or quality problems, reduced orders or higher manufacturing costs, delays in collecting accounts receivable and additional service and warranty expense may result. Any of these events could materially adversely affect Novellus’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Novellus’ Intellectual Property Is Critical to the Success of Its Business

Novellus intends to continue to pursue the legal protection of its technology primarily through patent and trade secret protection. Novellus currently holds over 100 patents and intends to file additional patent applications as appropriate. There can be no assurance that patents will be issued from any of these pending applications or that any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will be sufficiently broad to protect Novellus’ technology. While Novellus intends to protect its intellectual property rights vigorously, there can be no assurance that any patents held by Novellus will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to Novellus. Novellus also relies on trade secrets and proprietary technology that it seeks to protect, in part, through Novellus’ confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that Novellus will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that Novellus’ trade secrets will not otherwise become known to or independently developed by others. There has also been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in semiconductor related industries. Novellus is currently involved in such litigation (see Part II, Other Information, Item 1. Legal Proceedings). Except as set forth in “Part II, Other Information, Item 1. Legal Proceedings,” Novellus is not aware of any significant claim of infringement by Novellus’ products of any patent or proprietary rights of others, however, Novellus could become involved in additional litigation in the future. Although Novellus does not believe the outcome of the current litigation will have a material impact on its business, financial condition, or results of operations, no assurances can be given that this litigation or future litigation will not have such an impact. In addition to the current

22


Table of Contents

litigation, Novellus’ operations, including the further commercialization of Novellus’ products, could provoke additional claims of infringement from third parties. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to Novellus, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by Novellus or to defend Novellus against claimed infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort by Novellus, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in Novellus’ loss of proprietary rights, subject Novellus to significant liabilities to third parties, require Novellus to seek licenses from third parties or prevent Novellus from manufacturing or selling its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Novellus Is Susceptible to Supply Shortages

Novellus uses numerous suppliers to supply parts, components, and sub-assemblies for the manufacture and support of its products. Although Novellus makes reasonable efforts to ensure that such parts are available from multiple suppliers, this is not always possible. Accordingly, Novellus obtains certain key parts from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. These suppliers are, in some cases, thinly capitalized, independent companies that generate significant portions of their business from Novellus and/or a small group of other companies in the semiconductor industry. Although Novellus seeks to reduce its dependence on these limited source suppliers, disruption or termination of certain of these sources could occur and such disruptions could have at least a temporary adverse effect on Novellus’ operations. Moreover, a prolonged inability to obtain certain components could have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, and results of operations and could result in damage to its customer relationships.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Novellus uses financial instruments that potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and financial instruments used in hedging activities. Novellus invests its cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, readily marketable debt securities, or medium-term notes. Novellus places its investments with high-credit-quality financial institutions and limits the credit exposure from any one financial institution or instrument. Novellus performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral. Novellus has an exposure to nonperformance by counterparties on the foreign exchange contracts used in hedging activities. These counterparties are large international financial institutions and to date, no such counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to Novellus. Novellus does not believe there is a significant risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because Novellus continuously monitors its positions and the credit ratings of such counterparties and the amount of contracts it enters into with any one party. However, there can be no assurance that there will be no significant nonperformance by these counterparties and that this would not materially adversely affect Novellus’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements May Impact Novellus’ Financial Position and Results of Operations

The FASB has issued an Exposure Draft related to their consolidations project that could substantially change the accounting for synthetic leases. If the Exposure Draft is enacted in its current form, Novellus may be required to treat the assets subject to the synthetic leases as purchased assets. Additionally, in June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 143 to be material to its financial condition or results of operations. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and provides a single accounting model for impairment of long-lived assets. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material effect on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations. In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” Novellus is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 145 effective January 1, 2003. Novellus does not expect the adoption of SFAS 145 to have a material effect on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” Novellus is currently evaluating the impact of this adoption. Although Novellus does not expect the adoption of these standards to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations, there can be no assurances that there will not be a material adverse affect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations in future periods. For a further discussion of how these recent accounting pronouncements may affect Novellus, please see Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 2 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. There also can be no assurances that the issuance by FASB of additional statements of financial accounting standards in the future would not materially adversely affect Novellus’ business, financial condition, and results of operations if such were required to be adopted by Novellus.

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.

23


Table of Contents

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Applied Litigation

On July 7, 1997, prior to the consummation of the purchase of the TFS business unit from Varian Associates Inc. (“Varian”), Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) filed a complaint (the “Applied Complaint”) against Varian in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Civil Action No. C-97-20523 RMW, alleging, among other things, infringement by Varian (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems made by TFS) of United States Patent Nos. 5,171,412, 5,186,718, 5,496,455 and 5,540,821 (the “Applied Patents”), which patents are owned by Applied.

Immediately after consummation of the TFS purchase, Novellus filed a complaint (the “Novellus Complaint”) against Applied in the same Court, Civil Action No. C-97-20551 RMW, alleging infringement by Applied (including the making, using, selling and/or offering for sale of certain products and systems) of United States Patent Nos. 5,314,597 (the “’597 patent”), 5,330,628, and 5,635,036 (the “Novellus Patents”) (the “’036 patent”) which patents Novellus acquired from Varian in the TFS purchase. In the Novellus Complaint, Novellus also alleged that it is entitled to declarations from Applied that Novellus does not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. Applied has filed counterclaims alleging that Novellus infringes the Applied Patents.

Also after consummation of the TFS purchase, but some time after Novellus filed the Novellus Complaint, Applied amended the Applied Complaint to add Novellus as a defendant. Novellus has requested that the Court dismiss Novellus as a defendant in Applied’s lawsuit against Varian. The Court has not yet required Novellus to file an answer to the Applied Complaint.

In addition to a request for a permanent injunction against further infringement, the Applied Complaint and Applied’s counterclaims to the Novellus Complaint include requests for damages for alleged prior infringement and treble damages for alleged willful infringement. In connection with the consummation of the TFS purchase, Varian agreed, under certain circumstances, to reimburse Novellus for certain of its legal and other expenses in connection with the defense and prosecution of this litigation, and to indemnify Novellus for a portion of any losses incurred by Novellus arising from this litigation (including losses resulting from a permanent injunction). Novellus and Varian believe that there are meritorious defenses to Applied’s allegations, including among other things, that Novellus’ operations (including TFS products and systems) do not infringe the Applied Patents and/or that the Applied Patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. However, the resolution of intellectual property disputes is often fact intensive and, therefore, inherently uncertain. Although Novellus believes that the ultimate outcome of the dispute with Applied will not have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations (taking into account both the defenses available to Novellus and Varian’s reimbursement and indemnity obligations), there can be no assurances that Applied will not ultimately prevail in this dispute and that, in such an event, Varian’s reimbursement and indemnity obligations will not be sufficient to fully reimburse Novellus for its losses. If Applied were to prevail in this dispute, it could have a material adverse effect on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

On March 25, 2002, the Court issued an order: (1) denying Applied’s motion for summary judgment of no literal infringement and no infringement under the doctrine of equivalents of claims 1 and 8 of Novellus’ ‘597 patent with respect to Applied’s 300mm Al WP series magnet arrays; (2) granting summary judgment of no literal infringement of claims 1 and 8 of Novellus’ ‘597 patent to Applied with respect to its 200mm RH and 300mm IMP series arrays, but denying summary judgment with respect to infringement under the doctrine of equivalents for these products and claims; (3) denying Novellus’ cross-motion for summary judgment of infringement of claims 1 and 8 of Novellus’ ‘597 patent; and (4) granting summary judgment of non-infringement to Applied with respect to claims 27 and 28 of Novellus’ ‘597 patent and Applied’s 300mm Al WP series magnet arrays.

On May 13, 2002, the Court issued an order: (1) denying Applied’s motion for summary judgment of no literal infringement of the ‘036 patent; and (2) granting Applied’s motion to bar Novellus from proving infringement of the ‘036 patent under the doctrine of equivalents.

The Novellus Complaint against Applied also includes requests for damages for prior infringement and treble damages for willful infringement, in addition to a request for a permanent injunction for further infringement. Novellus believes that this litigation will not have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations. However, there

24


Table of Contents

can be no assurances that Novellus will prevail against Applied. If Applied were to prevail against Novellus, it could have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Semitool Litigation I

On August 10, 1998, Semitool sued Novellus for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “District Court”). Semitool alleges that Novellus’ SABRE™ and SABRE™ xT copper deposition systems infringe two Semitool patents, U.S. Patent No. 5,222,310 (the “’310 patent”), issued June 29, 1993, entitled “Single Wafer Processor with a Frame,” and U.S. Patent No. 5,377,708 (the “’708 patent”), issued January 3, 1995, entitled “Multi-Station Semiconductor Processor with Volatilization.” Semitool seeks an injunction against Novellus’ manufacture and sale of the SABRE™ and SABRE™ xT systems, and seeks damages for past infringement. Semitool also seeks treble damages for alleged willful infringement. Semitool further seeks its attorneys’ fees and costs, and interest on any judgment.

On September 24, 1999, the District Court ruled on the interpretation of the claims of the ‘310 and ‘708 patents. On December 18, 1999, Novellus filed a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement.

On March 17, 2000, the District Court granted Novellus’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. The District Court ruled that Novellus’ SABRE™ and SABRE™ xT systems do not infringe the ‘310 and ‘708 patents.

On May 15, 2000, Semitool filed a notice of appeal, appealing the District Court’s judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”). On June 8, 2001, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment that Novellus’ SABRE™ and SABRE™ xT systems do not infringe the ‘310 and ‘708 patents.

On September 6, 2001, Semitool filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court to review the judgment of the Federal Circuit. The Supreme Court granted this writ, vacated the Federal Circuit’s opinion, and remanded the case to the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki, Co., 122 S. Ct. 1831 (2002). On July 23, 2002, the Federal Circuit again affirmed the District Court’s judgment of non-infringement.

Semitool Litigation II

On June 11, 2001, Semitool sued Novellus for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Semitool alleges that Novellus infringes Semitool’s U.S. Patent No. 6,197,181, issued March 6, 2001, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Electrolytically Depositing a Metal on a Microelectronic Workpiece.” Semitool seeks an injunction against Novellus and damages for past infringement. Semitool also seeks treble damages for alleged willful infringement. Semitool further seeks its attorneys’ fees and costs, and interest on any judgment.

On November 13, 2001, Novellus countersued Semitool for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Novellus alleges that Semitool infringes Novellus’ U.S. Patent Nos. 6,179,983 (the “’983 patent”), issued January 30, 2001 and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Treating Surface Including Virtual Anode;” 6,162,344, issued December 19, 2000 and entitled “Method of Electroplating Semiconductor Wafer Using Variable Currents and Mass Transfer to Obtain Uniform Plated Layer;” 6,110,346, issued August 29, 2000 and also entitled “Method of Electroplating Semiconductor Wafer Using Variable Currents and Mass Transfer to Obtain Uniform Plated Layer;” and 6,074,544, issued June 13, 2000 and also entitled “Method of Electroplating Semiconductor Wafer Using Variable Currents and Mass Transfer to Obtain Uniform Plated Layer.” Novellus seeks an injunction against Semitool and damages for past infringement. Novellus also seeks treble damages for willful infringement by Semitool. Novellus further seeks its attorneys’ fees and costs, and interest on any judgment.

On July 19, 2002, Novellus and Semitool entered into and filed a stipulation dismissing with prejudice both parties’ claims relating to the ‘983 patent.

Although it is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of litigation matters when the litigation is in such an early stage, Novellus believes that this litigation will not have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ financial condition or results of

25


Table of Contents

operations. However, there can be no assurances that Novellus will prevail against Semitool. If Semitool were to prevail against Novellus, it could have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Plasma Physics Litigation

On December 28, 1999, Plasma Physics Corporation and Solar Physics Corporation (collectively, “Plasma Physics”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against many of Novellus’ Japanese and Korean customers. The suit was entitled Plasma Physics and Solar Physics v. Fujitsu et al., Civil Action No. 99-8593, and was pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. On July 24, 2000, the Court ordered Plasma Physics to re-file separate complaints against the Japanese and Korean defendants, whereupon, Civil Action No. 99-8593 would be dismissed without prejudice. In accordance with the Court’s order, Plasma Physics re-filed separate complaints against the Japanese and Korean defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Many of the defendants notified Novellus that they believed that Novellus had indemnification obligations and liability for the lawsuits.

Plasma Physics asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 4,226,897, 5,470,784, and/or 5,543,634 (the “’897, ‘784, and ‘634 patents,” respectively) against the defendants. Plasma Physics sought an injunction against the defendants’ alleged infringement of the ‘784 and ‘634 patents (the ‘897 patent had expired). Plasma Physics also sought treble damages for alleged willful infringement. Plasma Physics further sought its attorney’s fees and costs, and interest on any judgment. All of the Japanese and Korean defendants who are or were customers of Novellus have since settled with Plasma Physics.

On June 1, 2000, Novellus filed a declaratory relief action against Plasma Physics and Solar Physics requesting a judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability with respect to the ‘897 and ‘784 patents. The suit was entitled Novellus v. Plasma Physics and Solar Physics, Civil Action No. 00-3146, and was pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. On July 31, 2000, Plasma Physics filed an Answer and Conditional Counterclaim. Plasma Physics denied that the ‘897 and ‘784 patents are invalid and unenforceable. Plasma Physics further denied that the ‘784 patent is not infringed by Novellus. Plasma Physics also asserted a conditional counterclaim against Novellus, alleging that Novellus’ PECVD processing systems infringe the ‘784 patent. On April 3, 2002, the suit was dismissed pursuant to a stipulation of voluntary dismissal without prejudice.

On June 12, 2001, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued to Plasma Physics U.S. Patent No. 6,245,648, entitled “Method of Forming Semiconducting Materials and Barriers” (the “’648 Patent”). On June 13, 2001, Plasma Physics sent a letter to Novellus, indicating that it may sue Novellus’ customers for their alleged infringement of the ‘648 Patent.

On June 14, 2002, certain of Novellus’ customers, including Agilent Technologies, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Agere Systems, Inc., National Semiconductor Corporation, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Texas Instruments, Inc., ST Microelectronics, Inc., LSI Logic Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, Conexant Systems, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, and Analog Devices Inc., were sued by Plasma Physics on certain U.S. Patents, including the ‘897, ‘784, ‘634, and ‘648 patents. Many of the defendants notified Novellus that they believed that Novellus had indemnification obligations and liability for the lawsuits.

Novellus believes that this matter will not have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurances that Novellus and its customers will prevail against Plasma Physics. If Plasma Physics were to prevail against Novellus or its customers, it could have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Linear Technology Litigation

On March 12, 2002, Linear Technology Corporation (“Linear”) filed a complaint against Novellus, among other parties, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Santa Clara, Case No. CV806004. The complaint seeks damages (including punitive damages) and injunctions for causes of actions involving, among other things, alleged breach of contract, fraud, unfair competition, breach of warranty, and declaratory relief. Novellus filed a demurrer to Linear’s complaint.

Although it is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of litigation matters when the litigation is in such an early stage, Novellus believes that this litigation will not have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurances that Novellus will prevail against Linear. If Linear were to prevail against Novellus, it could have a material adverse impact on Novellus’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At Novellus’ Annual Meeting of Shareholders, held on May 17, 2002, the following proposals were adopted by the margins indicated:

1.     Election of Directors.

                 
Nominee   In Favor   Withheld
Richard S. Hill
    99,723,142       29,617,501  
D. James Guzy
    127,917,306       1,423,337  
J. David Litster
    128,337,030       1,003,613  
Glen Possley
    128,356,721       983,922  
Robert H. Smith
    99,668,658       29,671,985  
William R. Spivey
    127,958,144       1,382,499  
Delbert A. Whitaker
    128,340,010       1,000,633  

As of August 7, 2002, Robert H. Smith retired as a member of the Board of Directors.

2.     Approval of the amendment to Novellus’ 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ Purchase Plan”), which reserved for the issuance of 4,900,000 shares under the Purchase Plan.

                 
In Favor   Opposed   Abstained
125,861,620
    2,919,829       559,194  

3.     Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Certified Public Accountants of Novellus for the next fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

                 
In Favor   Opposed   Abstained
124,865,557
    4,020,093       454,733  

ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six months ended June 29, 2002 and each of the five most recent fiscal years was as follows:

                                         
Six months ended Year ended December 31,
June 29, 2002   2001   2000   1999   1998   1997

4.48
    13.41       16.30       6.95       6.33        

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing fixed charges into earnings before income taxes and before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and that portion of net rental expense deemed representative of interest. In the year ended December 31, 1997, Novellus incurred a loss of $92.7 million, net of an income tax benefit of $23.8 million. Fixed charges for this period were $5.0 million.

27


Table of Contents

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  Exhibits

      10.1 Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K

         None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

  NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

  /s/ Kevin S. Royal


Kevin S. Royal
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer)

  August 13, 2002

28


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

         10.1 Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement

 

EXHIBIT 10.1

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of this ____ day of ___________, 2002, by and between Novellus Systems, Inc., a California corporation (the "Company"), and _____________________ ("Indemnitee"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in Section 16.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Company believes it is essential to retain and attract qualified directors and officers;

WHEREAS, Indemnitee is a director and/or officer of the Company;

WHEREAS, both the Company and Indemnitee recognize the increased risk of litigation and other claims being asserted against directors and officers of public companies;

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") has adopted bylaws (the "Bylaws") providing for the indemnification of the officers and directors of the Company to the maximum extent not prohibited by the California Corporations Code, as amended (the "Code");

WHEREAS, the Company's articles of incorporation (the "Articles") expressly authorize rights to indemnification "to the fullest extent permissible under California law";

WHEREAS, Indemnitee has been serving and intends to continue serving as a director and/or officer of the Company in part in reliance on the Articles and Bylaws;

WHEREAS, in recognition of Indemnitee's need for (i) substantial protection against personal liability, (ii) specific contractual assurance that the protection promised by the Articles and Bylaws will be available to Indemnitee, regardless of, among other things, any amendment to or revocation of the Articles or Bylaws, or any change in the composition of the Board or an acquisition transaction relating to the Company and (iii) an inducement to continue to provide effective services to the Company as a director and/or officer thereof, the Company wishes to provide for the indemnification of Indemnitee and to advance Expenses (as hereinafter defined) to Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law and as set forth in this Agreement, and, to the extent insurance is maintained by the Company, to provide for the continued coverage of Indemnitee under the Company's directors' and officers' liability insurance policies;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and of Indemnitee continuing to serve the Company directly, or at its request, with another Enterprise (as hereinafter defined), and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Indemnity of Indemnitee. The Company hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitee to the maximum extent not prohibited by the Code, as such may be amended from time to time, the Articles and the Bylaws, as such may be amended. In furtherance of the foregoing indemnification, and without limiting the generality thereof:


(a) Proceedings Other Than Proceedings by or in the Right of the Company. Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section l(a) if, by reason of his Corporate Status (as hereinafter defined), he is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant (as a witness or otherwise) in any Proceeding (as hereinafter defined) other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor. Pursuant to this Section 1(a), Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses (as hereinafter defined), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

(b) Proceedings by or in the Right of the Company.

(i) Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section 1(b) if, by reason of his Corporate Status, he is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant (as a witness or otherwise) in any Proceeding brought by or in the right of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor. Pursuant to this Section 1(b), Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with the defense or settlement of such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no indemnification shall be permitted under this section for any of the following:

(A) In respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which Indemnitee shall have been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be liable to the Company in the performance of Indemnitee's duty to the Company and its shareholders, unless and only to the extent that the court in which such proceeding is or was pending shall determine upon application that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, Indemnitee is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses and then only to the extent that the court shall determine;

(B) Amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of a pending action without court approval; or

(C) Expenses incurred in defending a pending action which is settled or otherwise disposed of without court approval.

(c) Indemnification for Expenses of a Party Who is Wholly or Partly Successful. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of his Corporate Status, a party to or participant and is successful on the merits or otherwise, in any Proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be indemnified to the maximum extent permitted by law against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith. If Indemnitee is not wholly successful in such Proceeding but is successful on the merits or otherwise as to one or more but less than all claims, issues or matters in such Proceeding, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with each successfully resolved claim, issue or matter. For purposes of this Section 1(c), and without limitation, the termination of any claim, issue or matter in such a Proceeding by dismissal, with or without prejudice, shall be deemed to be a successful result as to such claim, issue or matter.

2

2. Additional Indemnity. In addition to, and without regard to any limitations on, the indemnification provided for in Section 1, the Company shall and hereby does indemnify and hold harmless Indemnitee against all Expenses, judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf if, by reason of his Corporate Status, he is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant (as a witness or otherwise) in any Proceeding (including a Proceeding by or in the right of the Company), including, without limitation, all liability arising out of the negligence or active or passive wrongdoing of Indemnitee. The only limitation that shall exist upon the Company's obligations pursuant to this Agreement shall be that the Company shall not be obligated to make any payment to Indemnitee that is finally determined (under the procedures, and subject to the presumptions, set forth in Sections 6 and 7 hereof) to be unlawful under California law.

3. Limitations on Indemnity.

(a) No indemnity pursuant to Section 1 or 2 hereof shall be paid by the Company for any of the following:

(i) Any suit in which judgment is rendered against Indemnitee for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale by Indemnitee of securities of the Company pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law;

(ii) Any action, claim or proceeding (other than a proceeding referred to in Section 8(a) hereof) initiated by Indemnitee unless such action, claim or proceeding was authorized in the specific case by action of the Board;

(iii) Any solicitation of proxies by Indemnitee, or by a group of which he was or became a member consisting of two or more persons that had agreed (whether formally or informally and whether or not in writing) to act together for the purpose of soliciting proxies, in opposition to any solicitation of proxies approved by the Board;

(iv) Any activities by Indemnitee that constitute a breach of or default under any written agreement between Indemnitee and the Company;

(v) Any action, claim or proceeding brought by the Company and approved by a majority of the Board which alleges willful misappropriation of corporate assets by Indemnitee, disclosure of confidential information in breach of Indemnitee's fiduciary duty or contractual obligations of the Company, or any other willful and deliberate breach in bad faith of Indemnitee's duty to the Company or its shareholders; or

(vi) If a final decision by a court having jurisdiction in the matter shall determine that such indemnification is not lawful (and, in this respect, both the Company and Indemnitee have been advised that the Securities and Exchange Commission believes that indemnification for liabilities arising under the federal securities laws is against public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable and that claims for indemnification should be submitted to appropriate courts for adjudication).

(b) No indemnification or advance shall be made under this Agreement, unless a court of competent jurisdiction determines otherwise or unless required pursuant to Section 317(d) of the Code, in the following circumstances:

3

(i) If such indemnification would be inconsistent with a provision of the Articles, the Bylaws, a resolution of the shareholders or an agreement in effect at the time of the accrual of the alleged cause of action asserted in the Proceeding which prohibits or otherwise limits indemnification; or

(ii) If such indemnification would be inconsistent with any condition expressly imposed by a court in approving a settlement.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in the case of an action brought by or in the right of the Company for breach of a director's duty to the Company and its shareholders, the rights to indemnification in this Agreement in excess of those provided by Section 317 of the Code shall be subject to the limitations on indemnification set forth in
Section 204(a)(11) of the Code. However, the rights to indemnification in this Agreement shall not be subject to the limitations set forth in such Section 204(a)(11) in the case of, (i) an action brought by or in the right of the Company for a breach of the director's duty to the Company and its shareholders for indemnification not in excess of the rights for indemnification provided by
Section 317 of the Code or (ii) an action other than an action by or in the right of the Company for breach of a director's duty to the Company and its shareholders.

4. Contribution in the Event of Joint Liability.

(a) Whether or not the indemnification provided in Sections 1 and 2 hereof is available, in respect of any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), the Company shall pay, in the first instance, the entire amount of any judgment or settlement of such action, suit or proceeding without requiring Indemnitee to contribute to such payment and the Company hereby waives and relinquishes any right of contribution it may have against Indemnitee. The Company shall not enter into any settlement of any action, suit or proceeding in which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding) unless such settlement provides for a full and final release of all claims asserted against Indemnitee.

(b) Without diminishing or impairing the obligations of the Company set forth in the preceding subparagraph, if, for any reason, Indemnitee shall elect or be required to pay all or any portion of any judgment or settlement in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), the Company shall contribute to the amount of expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred and paid or payable by Indemnitee in proportion to the relative benefits received by the Company and all officers, directors or employees of the Company other than Indemnitee who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, from the transaction from which such action, suit or proceeding arose; provided, however, that the proportion determined on the basis of relative benefit may, to the extent necessary to conform to law, be further adjusted by reference to the relative fault of the Company and all officers, directors or employees of the Company other than Indemnitee who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, in connection with the events that resulted in such expenses, judgments, fines or settlement amounts, as well as any other equitable considerations which the law may require to be considered. The relative fault of the Company and all officers, directors or employees of the Company other than Indemnitee who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, shall be determined by reference to, among other things, the degree to which their actions were motivated by intent to gain personal profit or advantage, the degree to which their liability is primary or secondary, and the degree to which their conduct is active or passive.

4

(c) The Company hereby agrees to fully indemnify and hold Indemnitee harmless from any claims of contribution which may be brought by officers, directors or employees of the Company other than Indemnitee who may be jointly liable with Indemnitee.

5. Indemnification for Expenses of a Witness. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of his Corporate Status, a witness in any Proceeding to which Indemnitee is not a party, he shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith.

6. Advancement of Expenses. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall advance any and all Expenses incurred by or on behalf of Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding by reason of Indemnitee's Corporate Status within ten (10) days after the receipt by the Company of a statement or statements from Indemnitee requesting such advance or advances from time to time, whether prior to or after final disposition of such Proceeding. Such statement or statements shall reasonably evidence the Expenses incurred by Indemnitee and shall include or be preceded or accompanied by an undertaking by or on behalf of Indemnitee to repay any Expenses advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company. Any advances and undertakings to repay pursuant to this Section 6 shall be unsecured and interest free. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligation of the Company to advance Expenses pursuant to this Section 6 shall be subject to the condition that, if, when and to the extent that the Company determines that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law, the Company shall be entitled to be reimbursed, within thirty
(30) days of such determination, by Indemnitee (who hereby agrees to reimburse the Company) for all such amounts theretofore paid; provided, however, that if Indemnitee has commenced or thereafter commences legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure a determination that Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law, any determination made by the Company that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law shall not be binding and Indemnitee shall not be required to reimburse the Company for any advance of Expenses until a final judicial determination is made with respect thereto (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or lapsed).

7. Procedures and Presumptions for Determination of Entitlement to Indemnification. It is the intent of this Agreement to secure for Indemnitee rights of indemnity that are as favorable as may be permitted under the law and public policy of the State of California. Accordingly, the parties agree that the following procedures and presumptions shall apply in the event of any question as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement:

(a) To obtain indemnification (including, but not limited to, the advancement of Expenses and contribution by the Company) under this Agreement, Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a written request, including therein or therewith such documentation and information as is reasonably available to Indemnitee and is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification. The Secretary of the Company shall, promptly upon receipt of such a request for indemnification, advise the Board in writing that Indemnitee has requested indemnification.

(b) Upon written request by Indemnitee for indemnification pursuant to the first sentence of Section 7(a) hereof, a determination, if required by applicable law, with respect to Indemnitee's entitlement thereto shall be made in the specific case by one of the following four (4) methods, which shall be at the election of Indemnitee: (1) by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not parties to such proceeding, (2) if such quorum is not obtainable, by Independent Counsel (as hereinafter defined) in a written opinion, (3) by the shareholders (within the meaning of Section 153 of the Code), with the shares owned by Indemnitee not being entitled to vote thereon or (4)

5

by the court in which the proceeding is, or was pending upon application made by the Company or the agent or the attorney or other person rendering services in connection with the defense, whether or not the application by the agent, attorney or other person is opposed by the Company.

(c) If the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 7(b) hereof, the Independent Counsel shall be selected as provided in this Section 7(c). The Independent Counsel shall be selected by Indemnitee (unless Indemnitee shall request that such selection be made by the Board). Indemnitee or the Company, as the case may be, may, within ten (10) days after such written notice of selection shall have been given, deliver to the Company or to Indemnitee, as the case may be, a written objection to such selection; provided, however, that such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of "Independent Counsel" as defined in
Section 16 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as Independent Counsel. If a written objection is made and substantiated, the Independent Counsel selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is withdrawn or a court has determined that such objection is without merit. If, within twenty
(20) days after submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification pursuant to Section 7(a) hereof, no Independent Counsel shall have been selected and not objected to, either the Company or Indemnitee may petition the state courts of the State of California or other court of competent jurisdiction for resolution of any objection which shall have been made by the Company or Indemnitee to the other's selection of Independent Counsel and/or for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the court or by such other person as the court shall designate, and the person with respect to whom all objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under Section 7(b) hereof. The Company shall pay any and all reasonable fees and expenses of Independent Counsel incurred by such Independent Counsel in connection with acting pursuant to Section 7(b) hereof, and the Company shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses incident to the procedures of this Section 7(c), regardless of the manner in which such Independent Counsel was selected or appointed.

(d) In making a determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification hereunder, the person or persons or entity making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement if Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification in accordance with Section 7(a) of this Agreement. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion, by clear and convincing evidence.

(e) Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith if Indemnitee's action is based on the records or books of account of the Enterprise, including financial statements, or on information supplied to Indemnitee by the officers of the Enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the Enterprise or on information or records given or reports made to the Enterprise by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other expert selected with reasonable care by the Enterprise. In addition, the knowledge and/or actions, or failure to act, of any director, officer, agent or employee of the Enterprise shall not be imputed to Indemnitee for purposes of determining the right to indemnification under this Agreement. Whether or not the foregoing provisions of this Section 7(e) are satisfied, it shall in any event be presumed that Indemnitee has at all times acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion, by clear and convincing evidence.

(f) If the person, persons or entity empowered or selected under Section 7 to determine whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification shall not have made a determination within

6

thirty (30) days after receipt by the Company of the request therefor, the requisite determination of entitlement to indemnification shall be deemed to have been made and Indemnitee shall be entitled to such indemnification, absent
(i) a misstatement by Indemnitee of a material fact, or an omission of a material fact necessary to make Indemnitee's statement not materially misleading, in connection with the request for indemnification or (ii) a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law; provided, however, that such thirty (30) day period may be extended for a reasonable time, not to exceed an additional fifteen (15) days, if the person, persons or entity making the determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification in good faith requires such additional time for the obtaining or evaluating documentation and/or information relating thereto; and provided, further, that the foregoing provisions of this Section 7(f) shall not apply if the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by the shareholders pursuant to
Section 7(b) of this Agreement and if (A) within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Company of the request for such determination the Board or the directors who are not parties to the proceeding in respect of which indemnification is sought by Indemnitee, if appropriate, resolve to submit such determination to the shareholders for their consideration at an annual meeting thereof to be held within seventy-five (75) days after such receipt and such determination is made thereat or (B) a special meeting of shareholders is called within fifteen (15) days after such receipt for the purpose of making such determination, such meeting is held for such purpose within sixty (60) days after having been so called and such determination is made thereat.

(g) Indemnitee shall cooperate with the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information which is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any Independent Counsel, member of the Board or shareholder of the Company shall act reasonably and in good faith in making a determination under the Agreement of Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification. Any costs or expenses (including attorneys' fees and disbursements) incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the person, persons or entity making such determination shall be borne by the Company (irrespective of the determination as to Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification) and the Company hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold Indemnitee harmless therefrom.

(h) The Company acknowledges that a settlement or other disposition short of final judgment may be successful if it permits a party to avoid expense, delay, distraction, disruption and uncertainty. In the event that any action, claim or proceeding to which Indemnitee is a party is resolved in any manner other than by adverse judgment against Indemnitee (including, without limitation, settlement of such action, claim or proceeding with or without payment of money or other consideration) it shall be presumed that Indemnitee has been successful on the merits or otherwise in such action, suit or proceeding. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion, by clear and convincing evidence.

8. Remedies of Indemnitee.

(a) In the event that (i) a determination is made pursuant to Section 7 of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, (ii) advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement, (iii) no determination of entitlement to indemnification shall have been made pursuant to Section 7(b) of this Agreement within ninety (90) days after receipt by the Company of the request for indemnification, (iv) payment of indemnification is not made pursuant to this Agreement within ten (10) days after receipt by the Company of a written request therefor or (v) payment of indemnification is not made within ten (10) days after a determination has been made that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or such determination is deemed to have been made pursuant to
Section 7 of this Agreement, Indemnitee shall be entitled to an adjudication in an

7

appropriate court of the State of California, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, of his entitlement to such indemnification or advancement of Expenses. Indemnitee shall commence such proceeding seeking an adjudication within one hundred eighty (180) days following the date on which Indemnitee first has the right to commence such proceeding pursuant to this Section 8(a). The Company shall not oppose Indemnitee's right to seek any such adjudication.

(b) In the event that a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 7(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification, any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 8 shall be conducted in all respects as a de novo trial, on the merits and Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of that adverse determination under
Section 7(b). The Company shall have the burden of proof to show that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification hereunder.

(c) If a determination shall have been made pursuant to
Section 7(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, the Company shall be bound by such determination in any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 8, absent a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law.

(d) In the event that Indemnitee, pursuant to this Section 8, seeks a judicial adjudication of his rights under, or to recover damages for breach of, this Agreement, or to recover under any directors' and officers' liability insurance policies maintained by the Company, the Company shall pay on his behalf, in advance, any and all expenses (of the types described in the definition of Expenses in Section 16 of this Agreement) actually and reasonably incurred by him in such judicial adjudication, regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, advancement of expenses or insurance recovery.

(e) The Company shall be precluded from asserting in any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 8 that the procedures and presumptions of this Agreement are not valid, binding and enforceable and shall stipulate in any such court that the Company is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement.

9. Non-Exclusivity; Survival of Rights; Subrogation.

(a) The rights of indemnification as provided by this Agreement (including without limitation the right to advancement of Expenses) shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Indemnitee may at any time be entitled under applicable law, the Articles, the Bylaws, any agreement, a vote of shareholders or a resolution of directors or otherwise. No amendment, alteration or repeal of this Agreement or of any provision hereof shall limit or restrict any right of Indemnitee under this Agreement in respect of any action taken or omitted by such Indemnitee in his Corporate Status prior to such amendment, alteration or repeal. To the extent that a change in the Code, whether by statute or judicial decision, permits greater indemnification or advancement of Expenses than would be afforded currently under the Bylaws and this Agreement, it is the intent of the parties hereto that Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such change. No right or remedy herein conferred is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy, and every other right and remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right and remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or otherwise. The assertion or employment of any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise, shall not prevent the concurrent assertion or employment of any other right or remedy.

(b) In the event of any payment under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee. Following receipt of indemnification payments hereunder, as further assurance, Indemnitee shall execute all papers required

8

and take all action reasonably necessary to secure such rights, including execution of such documents as are reasonably necessary to enable the Company to bring suit to enforce such rights.

(c) The Company shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment of amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder if and to the extent that Indemnitee has otherwise actually received such payment under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise.

10. Duration of Agreement. All agreements and obligations of the Company contained herein shall continue during the period Indemnitee is an officer or director of the Company (or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other Enterprise) and shall continue thereafter so long as Indemnitee shall be subject to any Proceeding (or any proceeding commenced under Section 8 hereof) by reason of his Corporate Status, whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors (including any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company), assigns, spouses, heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives. This Agreement shall continue in effect regardless of whether Indemnitee continues to serve as an officer or director of the Company or any other Enterprise at the Company's request.

11. Change in Control. The Company agrees that if there is a Change in Control of the Company, other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company's Board who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control, then with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnification and advancement of Expenses under this Agreement or any other Agreement or under applicable law or the Company's Articles or Bylaws now or hereafter in effect relating to indemnification, the Company shall seek legal advice only from Independent Counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

12. Establishment of Trust. In the event of a Potential Change in Control, the Company shall, upon written request by Indemnitee, create a trust (the "Trust") for the benefit of Indemnitee, and from time to time upon written request of Indemnitee shall fund such Trust in an amount sufficient to satisfy any and all Expenses reasonably anticipated at the time of each such request to be incurred in connection with investigating, preparing for and defending any Proceeding by reason of Indemnitee's Corporate Status, and any and all judgments, fines, penalties and settlement amounts of any and all Proceedings by reason of Indemnitee's Corporate Status from time to time actually paid or claimed, reasonably anticipated or proposed to be paid. The amount or amounts to be deposited in the Trust pursuant to the foregoing funding obligation shall be determined by the Reviewing Party (as hereinafter defined) in any case in which the Independent Counsel referred to in Section 7 is involved. The terms of the Trust shall provide that upon a Change in Control (i) the Trust shall not be revoked or the principal thereof invaded, without the written consent of Indemnitee, (ii) the trustee of the Trust (the "Trustee") shall advance, within ten (10) days of a request by Indemnitee, any and all Expenses to Indemnitee (and Indemnitee hereby agrees to reimburse the Trust under the circumstances under which Indemnitee would be required to reimburse the Company under Section 6 of this Agreement), (iii) the Trust shall continue to be funded by the Company in accordance with the funding obligation set forth above, (iv) the Trustee shall promptly pay to Indemnitee all amounts for which Indemnitee shall be entitled to indemnification pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise and (v) all unexpended funds in the Trust shall revert to the Company upon a final determination by the Reviewing Party or a court of competent jurisdiction, as the case may be, that Indemnitee has been fully indemnified under the terms of this Agreement. The Trustee shall be a bank or trust company or other individual or entity chosen by

9

Indemnitee and acceptable to and approved of by the Company. Nothing in this
Section 12 shall relieve the Company of any of its obligations under this Agreement. All income earned on the assets held in the Trust shall be reported as income by the Company for federal, state, local and foreign tax purposes.

13. Insurance. The Company shall, from time to time, make the good faith determination whether or not it is practicable for the Company to obtain and maintain a policy or policies of insurance with reputable insurance companies providing the directors and officers of the Company with coverage for losses from wrongful acts, or to ensure the Company's performance of its indemnification obligations under this Agreement. Among other considerations, the Company will weigh the costs of obtaining such insurance coverage against the protection afforded by such coverage. In all policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance, Indemnitee shall be named as an insured in such a manner as to provide Indemnitee the same rights and benefits as are accorded to the most favorably insured of the Company's directors, if Indemnitee is a director; or of the Company's officers, if Indemnitee is not a director of the Company but is an officer or of the Company's key employees, if Indemnitee is not an officer or director but is a key employee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall have no obligation to obtain or maintain such insurance if the Company determines in good faith that such insurance is not reasonably available, if the premium costs for such insurance are disproportionate to the amount of coverage provided, if the coverage provided by such insurance is limited by exclusions so as to provide an insufficient benefit or if Indemnitee is covered by similar insurance maintained by a subsidiary or parent of the Company.

14. Enforcement.

(a) The Company expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement and assumed the obligations imposed on it hereby in order to induce Indemnitee to serve as an officer or director of the Company, and the Company acknowledges that Indemnitee is relying upon this Agreement in serving as an officer or director of the Company.

(b) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral, written and implied, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.

15. Limitation of Actions and Release of Claims. No proceeding shall be brought and no cause of action shall be asserted on behalf of the Company or any subsidiary against Indemnitee, his spouse, heirs, estate, executors or administrators after the expiration of one (1) year from the act or omission of Indemnitee upon which such proceeding is based; however, in a case where Indemnitee fraudulently conceals the facts underlying such cause of action, no proceeding shall be brought and no cause of action shall be asserted after the expiration of one (1) year from the earlier of (i) the date the Company or any subsidiary of the Company discovers such facts or (ii) the date the Company or any subsidiary of the Company could have discovered such facts by the exercise of reasonable diligence. Any claim or cause of action of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, including claims predicated upon the negligent act or omission of Indemnitee, shall be extinguished and deemed released unless asserted by filing of a legal action within such period. This
Section 15 shall not apply to any cause of action which has accrued on the date hereof and of which Indemnitee is aware on the date hereof, but as to which the Company has no actual knowledge apart from Indemnitee's knowledge.

16. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement:

(a) "Change in Control" shall be deemed to have occurred if (i) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than (i) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company; (ii) a corporation

10

owned directly or indirectly by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company or (iii) any current beneficial shareholder or group, as defined by Rule 13d-5 of the Exchange Act, including the heirs, assigns and successors thereof, of beneficial ownership within the meaning of, Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act of securities possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the Company's outstanding securities, hereafter becomes the "beneficial owner," as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% or more of the total combined voting power represented by the Company's then outstanding Voting Securities or (ii) during any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board and any new director whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board or (iii) the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the Voting Securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into Voting Securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the total voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (iv) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company, in one transaction or a series of transactions of all or substantially all of the Company's assets.

(b) "Corporate Status" describes the status of a person who is or was a director, officer, employee or other agent or fiduciary of (i) the Company, (ii) any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other Enterprise which such person is or was serving at the express written request of the Company or (iii) a foreign or domestic corporation which was a predecessor corporation of the Company or of another enterprise at the request of the predecessor corporation.

(c) "Enterprise" shall mean the Company and any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise of which Indemnitee is or was serving at the express written request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary.

(d) "Expenses" shall include all reasonable attorneys' fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and all other disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with prosecuting, defending, preparing to prosecute or defend, investigating, participating or being or preparing to be a witness in a Proceeding, or incurred in connection with any appeal resulting from any Proceeding.

(e) "Independent Counsel" means a law firm, or a member of a law firm, that is experienced in matters of corporation law and neither presently is, nor in the past five years has been, retained to represent: (i) the Company or Indemnitee in any matter material to either such party (other than with respect to matters concerning Indemnitee under this Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnification agreements) or (ii) any other party to the Proceeding giving rise to a claim for indemnification hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Independent Counsel" shall not include any person who, under the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing, would have a conflict of interest in representing either the Company or Indemnitee in an action to determine Indemnitee's rights under this Agreement. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Independent Counsel referred to above and to fully indemnify such counsel against any and all Expenses, claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto.

11

(f) "Potential Change in Control" shall be deemed to occur if (i) the Company enters into an agreement or arrangement, the consummation of which would result in the occurrence of a Change in Control; (ii) any person (including the Company) publicly announces an intention to take or to consider taking actions which, if consummated, would constitute a Change in Control;
(iii) any person (other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company acting in such capacity or a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), who is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 10% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding Voting Securities, increases his beneficial ownership of such securities by 5% or more over the percentage so owned by such person on the date hereof or (iv) the Board adopts a resolution to the effect that, for purposes of this Agreement, a Potential Change in Control has occurred.

(g) "Proceeding" includes any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternate dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry, administrative hearing or any other actual, threatened or completed proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Company or otherwise and whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which Indemnitee was, is or Indemnitee in good faith believes he will be involved as a party or otherwise, by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director of the Company, by reason of any action taken by him or of any inaction on his part while acting as an officer or director of the Company, or by reason of the fact that he is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other Enterprise; in each case whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement; including one pending on or before the date of this Agreement; and excluding one initiated by an Indemnitee pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement to enforce his rights under this Agreement.

(h) "Reviewing Party" shall mean any appropriate person or body consisting of a member or members of the Board or any other person or body appointed by Indemnitee (including the Independent Counsel referred to in
Section 7(c)) who is not a party to the particular Proceeding with respect to which Indemnitee is seeking indemnification.

(i) "Voting Securities" means any securities of the Company which vote generally in the election of directors.

17. Severability. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, illegal or otherwise unenforceable for any reason whatsoever: (a) the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement (including without limitation, each portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby and shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law and (b) to the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation, each portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to give effect to the intent manifested thereby.

18. Modification and Waiver. No supplement, modification, termination or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar) nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

12

Except as specifically provided herein, no failure to exercise or any delay in exercising a right or remedy hereunder shall constitute a waiver thereof.

19. Notice by Indemnitee. Indemnitee agrees promptly to notify the Company in writing upon being served with any summons, citation, subpoena, complaint, indictment, information or other document relating to any Proceeding or matter which may be subject to indemnification covered hereunder. The failure to so notify the Company shall not relieve the Company of any obligation which it may have to Indemnitee under this Agreement or otherwise unless and only to the extent that such failure or delay materially prejudices the Company.

20. Notice to Insurers. If, at the time of the receipt of Indemnitee's written notice of a claim pursuant to Section 19, the Company has directors' and officers' liability insurance in effect, the Company shall give prompt notice of the commencement of the Proceeding to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective policies. The Company shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such insurers to pay, on behalf of Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such Proceeding in accordance with the terms of such policies.

21. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if (i) delivered by hand and receipted for by the party to whom said notice or other communication shall have been directed or (ii) mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business day after the date of such mailing:

(a) If to Indemnitee, to the address set forth below Indemnitee signature hereto.

(b) If to the Company, to:

Novellus Systems, Inc. 4000 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 Attention: Secretary

or to such other address as may have been furnished to Indemnitee by the Company or to the Company by Indemnitee, as the case may be.

22. Identical Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Only one such counterpart signed by the party against whom enforceability is sought needs to be produced to evidence the existence of this Agreement.

23. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction thereof.

24. Governing Law. The parties agree that this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California without application of the conflict of laws principles thereof. The Company and Indemnitee each hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which arises out of or relates to this Agreement and agree that any action instituted under this Agreement shall be brought only in the state courts of the State of California. Should any provision of this Agreement be determined by a court of law to be illegal or unenforceable, such provision shall be

13

enforced to the fullest extent allowed by law and the other provisions shall nevertheless remain effective and shall remain enforceable.

25. Gender. Use of the masculine pronoun shall be deemed to include usage of the feminine pronoun where appropriate.

14

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement on and as of the day and year first above written.

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

By:

Name:
Title:


Name:

Address: