UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)
þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2007
		or
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from __________ to __________

(919) 767-3250

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ  No  o

HARRIS STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended March 30, 2007

INDEX

		Page
Part I. Financial Information:
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Quarter and Three Quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006			3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006			4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006			5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Quarters ended March 30, 2007			6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			38
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			39
Part II. Other Information:
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			40
Item 1A. Risk Factors			40
Item 6. Exhibits			40
Signatures
Exhibit Index
EXHIBIT 10.15.1
EXHIBIT 10.15.2
EXHIBIT 15
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains trademarks of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

March 30, 2007

Note A — Significant Business Development Activities, Basis of Presentation and Nature of Operations

      Significant Business Development Activities — On January 26, 2007, Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (the “Company,” “HSTX,” “Harris Stratex,” “we,” “us” and “our”) completed its merger (the “Stratex Acquisition”) with Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”) pursuant to a Formation, Contribution and Merger Agreement among Harris Corporation (“Harris”), Stratex, and Stratex Merger Corp., as amended and restated on December 18, 2006 and amended by letter agreement on January 26, 2007 (the “Combination Agreement”). On January 26, 2007, pursuant to the Combination Agreement, Stratex Merger Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into Stratex with Stratex as the surviving corporation (renamed as “Harris Stratex Networks Operating Corporation”). Concurrently with the merger of Stratex and Stratex Merger Corp. (the “merger”), Harris contributed the Microwave Communications Division, along with $32.1 million in cash (comprised of $26.9 million contributed on January 26, 2007 and $5.2 million held by the Company’s foreign operating subsidiaries on January 26, 2007) to the Company (the “contribution transaction”).

     Pursuant to the merger with Stratex, each share of Stratex common stock was converted into one-fourth of a share of our Class A common stock. As a result of the transaction, 24,782,153 shares of our Class A common stock were issued to the former holders of Stratex common stock. In the contribution transaction, Harris contributed the assets of MCD, along with $32.1 million in cash, and in exchange, we assumed certain liabilities of Harris related to MCD and issued 32,913,377 shares of our Class B common stock to Harris. This contribution by Harris resulted in the reclassification of division equity totaling $251.2 million to additional paid-in capital at January 26, 2007. As a result of these transactions, Harris owned approximately 57 percent and the former Stratex shareholders owned approximately 43 percent of the total stock of our outstanding immediately following the closing. The Stratex acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination.

      Basis of Presentation — The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The results of operations and cash flows of Stratex are included in these condensed consolidated financial statements since January 26, 2007, the date of acquisition. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

     For periods prior to January 26, 2007, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Microwave Communications Division of Harris (“MCD”) and Harris subsidiaries classified as part of MCD. These financial statements have been determined to be the historical financial statements of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. As used in these notes, the term “MCD” refers to the consolidated operations of the Microwave Communications Division of Harris. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and changes in cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. The results for the quarter and three quarters ended March 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year or any subsequent period. The balance sheet at June 30, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements of MCD but does not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for annual financial statements.

     For periods prior to January 26, 2007, the accompanying historical financial statements are presented on a carve-out basis and reflect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses that were directly attributable to MCD as it was operated within Harris. MCD’s combined statements of operations include all of the related costs of doing business, including an allocation of certain general corporate expenses of Harris, which were in support of MCD, including costs for finance, legal, treasury, purchasing, quality, environmental, safety, human resources, tax, audit and public relations departments and other corporate and infrastructure costs. MCD was allocated $0.3 million and $6.9 million of these overhead costs related to Harris’s shared functions for the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $3.7 million and $10.2 million for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. These costs represent approximately 6.1 percent and 29.2 percent, respectively, of the total cost of these shared services in each of the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and approximately 9.4 percent and 18.4 percent, respectively, of the total cost of these shared services in each of the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. These cost allocations were primarily based on a ratio of MCD sales to total Harris sales, multiplied by the total headquarters expense of Harris. During the quarter and three quarters ended March 31, 2006, the corporate expense allocation included a $5.4 million charge for the settlement of litigation. The allocation of Harris overhead expenses concluded on January 26,

2007 and, accordingly, for the quarter ended March 30, 2007, one month allocation was calculated and for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007, seven months allocation was calculated. Management believes that these allocations were made on a reasonable basis.

     The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

      Nature of Operations — We design, manufacture and sell a broad range of microwave radios and scalable wireless network solutions for use in worldwide wireless communications networks. Applications include cellular/mobile infrastructure connectivity; secure data networks; public safety transport for state, local and Federal government users; and right-of-way connectivity for utilities, pipelines, railroads and industrial companies. In general, wireless networks are constructed using microwave radios and other equipment and network management solutions to connect cell sites, fixed-access facilities, switching systems, land mobile radio systems and other similar systems.

      Related Party Transactions — Prior to the Stratex Acquisition, Harris provided information services, human resources, financial shared services, facilities, legal support, and supply chain management services to us. The charges for these services were billed to us primarily based on actual usage.

     These amounts were charged directly to us and were not part of the corporate allocations expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented in this report. The amount charged to us for these services was $3.2 million and $4.6 million in each of the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $11.4 million and $13.4 million in each of the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. These amounts are included in the cost of product sales and services and engineering, selling and administrative expenses captions in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented in this report.

     There are other services Harris provides to us that were not directly charged to the Company. These functions and amounts are explained above under the subtitle “Basis of Presentation.” These amounts are included within “Due to Harris Corporation” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Additionally, we have other receivables and payables in the normal course of business with Harris. These amounts are netted within Due to Harris on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Total receivables from Harris were $0.4 million and $7.5 million at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Total payables to Harris were $9.3 million and $20.1 million at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

     Harris was the primary source of our financing and equity activities for the periods presented in this report through January 26, 2007, the date of the Stratex Acquisition. During the seven months ended January 26, 2007, Harris’s net investment in MCD was increased by $24.1 million. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2006, Harris’s net investment in MCD was decreased by $0.6 million.

     Additionally, through the date of the Stratex Acquisition, Harris has loaned funds to us to fund our international entities and we had provided excess cash at various locations to Harris. We recognized such interest income and expense on these loans. The amount of interest income and expense for both the quarter and three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006 was not significant.

     We have sales to, and purchases from, other entities of Harris from time to time. The entity initiating the transaction sells to the other Harris entity at cost or transfer price, depending on jurisdiction. The entity making the sale to the end customer records the profit on the transaction above cost or transfer price, depending on jurisdiction. Our sales to other entities of Harris were $0.3 million and $1.7 million in the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $1.7 million and $4.5 million in the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. We also recognized costs associated with related party purchases of $1.6 million and $3.2 million in the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $6.7 million and $9.2 million in the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively.

     On January 26, 2007, we entered into a new Transition Services Agreement with Harris to provide for certain services during the period subsequent to the Stratex Acquisition. These services are charged to us based primarily on actual usage and include database management, supply chain operating systems, eBusiness services, sales and service, financial systems, back office material resource planning support, HR systems, internal and information systems shared services support, network management and help desk support, and server administration and support. During the quarter ended March 30, 2007, Harris charged us $1.2 million for these services.

     Prior to January 26, 2007, MCD used certain assets in Canada owned by Harris that were not contributed to us as part of the Combination Agreement. We continue to use these assets in our business and we entered into a 5 year lease agreement to

accommodate this use. This lease agreement is considered a capital lease under generally accepted accounting principles. At March 30, 2007, our lease obligation to Harris is $5.9 million and the related asset amount is included in our Property, plant and equipment. Quarterly lease payments are due to Harris based on the amount of 103% of Harris’ annual depreciation calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Of the $5.9 million lease obligation, $2.9 million is classified as current in our balance sheet.

Note B — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards” (“FSP 123R-3”). FSP 123R-3 provides a simplified alternative method to calculate the beginning pool of excess tax benefits against which excess future deferred tax assets (that result when the compensation cost recognized for an award exceeds the ultimate tax deduction) could be written off under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement 123R”). The guidance in FSP 123R-3 was effective on November 10, 2005. We determined not to make the one-time election to adopt the alternative transition method described in FSP 123R-3. We have implemented the provisions of Statement 123R following the guidance for calculating the pool of excess tax benefits described in paragraph 81 of Statement 123R and the guidance related to reporting cash flows described in paragraph 68 of Statement 123R. Our determination not to adopt the alternative transition method described in FSP 123R-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In March 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” (“Issue 06-3”). The Task Force reached a conclusion that the presentation of taxes such as sales, use, value added, and excise taxes on either a gross (included in revenues and costs) or a net (excluded from revenues and costs) basis is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed by a company. In addition, a company should disclose the amounts of those taxes such as sales, use, value added, and excise taxes that are reported on a gross basis in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The provisions of Issue 06-3 were effective for interim and annual reporting periods that began after December 15, 2006. Our early adoption and implementation of the provisions of Issue 06-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2006, which for us will be our fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“Statement 157”). Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurement in which the FASB concluded that fair value was the relevant measurement, but does not require any new fair value measurements. Statement 157 will be effective for us beginning in fiscal 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact Statement 157 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“Statement 158”), which amends FASB Statements No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions;” No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits;” No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions;” and No. 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.” Statement 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through the comprehensive income of a business entity. Statement 158 also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employer’s year-end balance sheet, with limited exceptions. The portion of Statement 158 that requires the recognition of overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability will be effective for us as of June 29, 2007. The portion of Statement 158 that requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employer’s year-end balance sheet will be effective for us as of July 3, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact Statement 158 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 expresses the SEC’s views regarding the process of quantifying misstatements in financial statements. The view of the SEC is that the effects of prior year errors in the balance sheet must be taken into account for the current year income statement financial reporting. We implemented the provisions of SAB 108 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and it did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“Statement 159”). Statement 159 allows companies to voluntarily choose, at specified election dates, to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value (the “fair value option”). The election is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, all unrealized gains or losses in fair value for that instrument shall be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Statement 159 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007, which for us will be our fiscal 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact Statement 159 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Note C — Business Combination — Acquisition of Stratex Networks, Inc.

     On January 26, 2007, we completed our merger with Stratex pursuant to the Combination Agreement. Pursuant to the merger with Stratex, each share of Stratex common stock was converted into one-fourth of a share of our Class A common stock. As a result of the transaction, 24,782,153 shares of our Class A common stock were issued to the former holders of Stratex common stock. In the contribution transaction, Harris contributed the assets of MCD, along with $32.1 million in cash (comprised of $26.9 million contributed on January 26, 2007 and $5.2 million held by the Company’s foreign operating subsidiaries on January 26, 2007) and, in exchange we assumed certain liabilities of Harris related to MCD and issued 32,913,377 shares of our Class B common stock to Harris. As a result of these transactions, Harris owned approximately 57 percent of our outstanding stock and the former Stratex shareholders owned approximately 43 percent of our outstanding stock immediately following the closing.

     We completed the Stratex Acquisition to create a leading global communications solutions company offering end-to-end wireless transmission solutions for mobile and fixed-wireless service providers and private networks.

     The Stratex Acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. Total consideration paid by us was approximately $493.1 million as summarized in the following table:

     The table below represents the preliminary allocation of the total consideration to the purchased tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based on management’s assessment of their respective fair values as of the date of acquisition.

Balance Sheet as of the acquisition date (in millions)
Cash and short-term investments		$	58.6
Accounts and notes receivable			43.1
Inventories			44.2
Deferred tax assets			17.9
In-process research and development			15.3
Identifiable intangible assets			149.5
Goodwill			247.1
Property, plant and equipment			32.8
Other assets			10.6
Total assets		$	619.1
Short-term debt		$	11.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			61.6
Advance payments and unearned income			2.9
Liability for severance payments			7.1
Long-term debt			13.4
Deferred tax liabilities			16.5
Long-term restructuring liabilities			8.7
Warrants			4.5
Common stock and additional paid-in capital			493.1
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	619.1

     Included in the liabilities assumed as presented in the table above were $7.1 million in severance and related costs for certain Stratex employees.

     The following table summarizes the allocation of estimated identifiable intangible assets resulting from the acquisition. For purposes of this allocation, we have assessed a fair value of Stratex identifiable intangible assets related to customer contracts, customer relationships, employee covenants not to compete, developed technology and tradenames based on the net present value of the projected income stream of these identifiable intangible assets. The resulting fair value is being amortized over the estimated useful life of each identifiable intangible asset on a straight-line basis. We estimated the fair value of acquired in-process research and development to be approximately $15.3 million, which we have reflected in “Acquired in-process research and development” expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. This represents certain technologies under development, primarily related to the next generation of the Eclipse product line. We estimated that the technologies under development were approximately 50 percent complete at the date of acquisition. We expect to incur up to an additional $3.4 million to complete this development, with completion expected in late calendar 2007.

     The Stratex Acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the Stratex results of operations have been included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and cash flows since the acquisition date of January 26, 2007 and are included almost entirely in our International Microwave segment. The purchase price allocation is preliminary and until January 25, 2008, additional information could come to our attention that may require us to further revise the purchase price allocation in connection with the Stratex Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets acquired was assigned to goodwill. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition was associated primarily with the Stratex market presence and leading position, its growth opportunity in the markets in which it operated, and its experienced work force and established operating infrastructure.

     In accordance with Statement 142, goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually. The goodwill resulting from the Stratex Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. The write-off of in-process research and development noted in the above table was included in our consolidated statement of income during the quarter ended March 30, 2007. We obtained the assistance of independent valuation specialists to assist us in determining the allocation of the purchase price for the Stratex Acquisition.

     The acquired identifiable intangible assets and their respective book values at March 31, 2007 are shown in the table below (in millions):

     The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations had we owned Stratex Networks for the entire periods presented.

Note D — Short-Term Investments

     We invest our excess cash in high-quality marketable instruments to ensure that cash is readily available for use in our current operations. Accordingly, all of the marketable securities are classified as “available-for-sale” in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115. We view our available-for-sale portfolio as available for use in our current operations. Accordingly, we have classified all investments in marketable securities as short-term, even though the stated maturity date may be one year or more beyond the current balance sheet date. All investments are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Unrealized holding gains on the portfolio as of March 30, 2007

were insignificant. At March 30, 2007, the available-for-sale securities had contractual maturities ranging from 1 month to 12 months, with a weighted average maturity of 68 days.

Note E — Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

     Total comprehensive loss for the quarter and three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006 was comprised of the following:

     The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 were as follows:

     On January 26, 2007, we acquired $43.1 million in receivables from the Stratex Acquisition at fair value.

Note G — Inventories

     Our inventories are summarized below:

     On January 26, 2007, we acquired $44.2 million of inventory from the Stratex Acquisition at fair value.

Note H — Property, Plant and Equipment

     Our property, plant and equipment are summarized below:

     At January 26, 2007, we acquired $32.8 million of property, plant and equipment from the Stratex Acquisition at fair value.

     Depreciation and amortization expense related to plant and equipment was $4.3 million and $3.2 million in the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $8.7 million and $8.7 million in the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively .

     During the three quarters ended March 31, 2006, we recognized a gain of $1.8 million from the sale of land and building that is included in the engineering, selling and administrative expenses caption in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Note I — Credit Facility and Debt

     Our debt consisted of the following at March 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006:

     As part of the Stratex Acquisition, we assumed the existing credit facility of Stratex with a commercial bank (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility allows for revolving credit borrowings of up to $50 million with available credit defined as $50 million less the outstanding balance of the long-term portion and any usage under the revolving credit portion. As of March 30, 2007, the outstanding balance of the long-term portion of our Credit Facility was $22.3 million and there were $3.4 million in outstanding standby letters of credit as of that date which are defined as usage under the revolving credit portion of the facility. The Credit Facility is unsecured.

     Term Loan A of the Credit Facility requires monthly principal payments of $0.5 million plus interest at a fixed rate of 6.38% through May 2008. Term Loan B requires monthly principal payments of $0.4 million plus interest at a fixed rate of 7.25% through March 2010.

     The credit facility agreement contains a minimum tangible net worth covenant and a liquidity ratio covenant. At March 30, 2007 we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

     At March 30, 2007, our future debt principal payment obligations were as follows:

Note K — Redeemable Preference Shares

     During the quarter ended March 30, 2007, our Singapore subsidiary issued 8,250 redeemable preference shares to the U.S. parent company which, in turn, sold the shares to two unrelated investment companies at par value for total sale proceeds of $8.25 million. The redeemable preference shares have an automatic redemption date of February 2017, which is 10 years from the date of issue. Preference dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly in cash at the rate of 12 percent per annum. The holders of the redeemable preference shares have liquidation rights in priority of all classes of capital stock of our Singapore subsidiary. The holders of the redeemable preference shares do not have any other participation in, or rights to, our profits, assets or capital shares, and do not have rights to vote as a shareholder of the Singapore subsidiary unless the preference dividend or any part thereof is in arrears and has remained unpaid for at least 12 months after it has been declared. Preference dividends are recorded as interest expense in the accompanying Statement of Operations. We have classified the redeemable preference shares as long-term debt due to the mandatory redemption provision 10 years from issue date.

     Our Singapore subsidiary has the right at any time after 5 years from the issue date to redeem, in whole or in part, the redeemable preference shares as follows:

105 percent of the issue price after 5 years but before 6 years from issue date
104 percent of the issue price after 6 years but before 7 years from issue date
103 percent of the issue price after 7 years but before 8 years from issue date
102 percent of the issue price after 8 years but before 9 years from issue date
101 percent of the issue price after 9 years but before 10 years from issue date
100 percent of the issue price at the automatic redemption date of 10 years from issue date

     During the quarter ended March 30, 2007, warrants to purchase 18,750 shares of our Class A common stock were exercised for total proceeds of $0.2 million.

Note M — Restructuring Activities

     In order to improve operating efficiencies, and to create synergies through the consolidation of facilities, we adopted a plan in February 2007 to scale down our operations in Montreal, Canada and, to a lesser extent, in the U.S. In the initial phase of this plan, we commenced notification of approximately 200 employees in Montreal that their employment will be terminated between March 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007. We believe that the overall cost to implement this plan will be in the range of $8.0 million to $9.0 million for Montreal (consisting primarily of severance and other benefits) and approximately $0.5 million to $1.0 million for the restructuring in the U.S. (consisting of severance and related benefits costs). These plans are expected to be fully implemented by December 31, 2007. In accordance with the provisions of Statement 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” approximately $1.3 million of these restructuring costs have been recognized during the quarter ended March 30, 2007. Restructuring costs are included in “Engineering, selling and administrative expenses” on our statement of operations.

     Additionally, during the quarter ended March 30, 2007, in connection with the Stratex Acquisition on January 26, 2007 (see Note C), we recognized restructuring charges recorded by Stratex prior to — and not related to — the acquisition as summarized in the table below. These charges relate primarily to facility consolidation costs for Stratex’s San Jose, California facility.

     During fiscal 2006, in order to improve operating efficiencies, and to create synergies through the consolidation of facilities, we implemented a restructuring plan in the second quarter which included moving manufacturing at the Montreal location to the San Antonio, Texas manufacturing plant. As part of this restructuring plan, we reduced the workforce by 110 employees. Pursuant to the provisions of Statement 146, we recorded a total of $3.7 million for restructuring charges, $2.3 million of which related to employee severance benefits, and $1.4 million for building lease obligation and transition costs. In connection with this restructuring, we also recorded $1.1 million for fixed asset write-offs.

     The following table summarizes the activity relating to restructuring charges for fiscal 2006 and for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007:

Note N — Stock Options and Share-Based Compensation

     As of March 30, 2007, we had one stock incentive plan for our employees and outside directors, the 2007 Stock Equity Plan, which was adopted by our board of directors and approved by Harris as our sole shareholder in January 2007. We believe that awards under this plan more closely align the interests of our employees with those of our shareholders. Certain share-based awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined under our Stock Equity Plan). Shares of Class A common stock remaining available for future issuance under our stock incentive plan totaled 4,427,648 as of March 30, 2007. Our stock incentive plan provides for the issuance of share-based awards in the form of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock. The initial grant of awards under this plan was made on February 28, 2007 and we recognized $0.3 million in compensation cost that was charged against pre-tax loss during the quarter ended March 30, 2007. Under this initial grant, we issued 292,400 stock options, 138,752 restricted shares and 141,200 performance shares.

     We also assumed all of the former Stratex Networks outstanding stock options as of January 26, 2007, in connection with the acquisition. We recognized $0.7 million in compensation cost relating to services provided from January 26, 2007 through March 30, 2007 that was charged against pre-tax loss during the quarter ended March 30, 2007 for the portion of these stock options that were unvested at January 26, 2007. For the portion of these assumed stock options that were vested at the date of the Stratex Acquisition, we included their fair value of $15.5 million as part of the purchase price of the Stratex Acquisition.

     Finally, some of our employees that were formerly employed by MCD continue to participate in Harris’ four shareholder-approved stock incentive plans (the “Harris Plans”) under which options or other share-based compensation is outstanding. In total, the compensation cost related to the Harris Plans’ share-based awards that was charged against pre-tax income was $0.4 million for the quarter ended March 30, 2007 compared to $0.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and $1.1 million for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 compared to $1.4 million for the three quarters ended March 31, 2006. These costs have been paid to Harris in cash.

     The awards to our employees under the Harris Plans during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 consisted of 87,800 shares under stock option grants; 18,600 shares under performance share awards; 2,400 shares under performance share unit awards and 18,000 shares under restricted stock awards. The fair value of these options and awards was estimated using a Black-Sholes-Merton option valuation model that used the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 4.8 percent, expected volatility 32.2 percent, expected dividend yield of 1.0 percent and expected life in years of 4.33.

     In total, compensation cost for share-based awards charged to pre-tax loss in our statement of operations was $1.4 million and $0.6 million for the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $2.1 million and $1.5 million for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and was charged to our Statement of Operations as follows:

      Stock Options Awarded

     The following information relates to stock options that have been granted under our stock incentive plan. Option exercise prices are 100 percent of fair market value on the date the options are granted. Options may be exercised for a period set at the time of grant, generally 7 years after the date of grant, and they generally vest in installments of 50 percent one year from the grant date, 25 percent two years from the grant date and 25 percent three years from the grant date.

     The fair value of each option award for the initial grant on February 28, 2007 under our stock equity plan was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model using the assumptions set forth in the following table. Expected volatility is based on implied volatility from a group of peer companies developed with the assistance of an independent valuation firm using a 5 year look-back period. The expected term of the options is based on the safe harbor provision as described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

     A summary of the significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value of our stock option grants is as follows:

     We obtained an independent valuation to assist us in determining market-based assumptions to estimate the fair value of stock options granted.

     A summary of stock option activity under our stock incentive plan during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 is as follows:

     The weighted average remaining contractual term for stock options that were outstanding as of March 30, 2007 was 6.9 years. There were no stock options that were exercisable as of March 30, 2007. The intrinsic value for stock options that were outstanding and exercisable as of March 30, 2007 was zero.

     The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $11.61 per share for options granted during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007. There was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 since none were exercised.

     A summary of the status of our nonvested stock options at March 30, 2007 granted under our stock incentive plan and changes during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007, are as follows:

						Weighted-
						Average
						Grant-Date
		Shares				Fair Value
Nonvested stock options at July 1, 2006			—			$	—
Stock options granted			292,400			$	11.61
Stock options vested			—			$	—
Nonvested stock options at March 30, 2007			292,400			$	11.61

     As of March 30, 2007, there was $3.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under our stock incentive plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years. The total fair value of stock options that vested during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 was zero.

      Restricted Stock Awards

     The following information relates to awards of restricted stock that were granted on February 28, 2007 to employees and outside directors under our stock incentive plan. The restricted stock is not transferable until vested and the restrictions lapse upon the achievement of continued employment over a specified time period. Restricted stock issued to employees cliff vests 3 years after grant date. Restricted stock issued to directors generally cliff vests 1 year after grant date. We recognized $0.1 million of costs during the quarter ended March 30, 2007 which are included in “Engineering, selling and administrative expenses.”

     The fair value of each restricted stock grant is based on the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and is amortized to compensation expense over its vesting period. At March 30, 2007, there were 138,752 shares of restricted stock outstanding.

     A summary of the status of our restricted stock at March 30, 2007 and changes during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007, are as follows:

						Weighted-
						Average
						Grant
		Shares				Price
Restricted stock outstanding at July 1, 2006			—			$	—
Restricted stock granted			138,752			$	20.40
Restricted stock vested			—			$	—
Restricted stock forfeited			—			$	—
Restricted stock outstanding at March 30, 2007			138,752			$	20.40

     As of March 30, 2007, there was $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards under our stock incentive plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.77 years. There were no shares of restricted stock that vested during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007. The weighted-average grant date price of the 138,752 shares of restricted stock granted during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 was $20.40 per share.

      Performance Share Awards

     The following information relates to awards of performance shares that have been granted to employees on February 28, 2007 under our stock incentive plan. Vesting of performance share awards is subject to performance criteria such as meeting predetermined earnings and return on invested capital targets for a 29-month plan period ending June 30, 2009 and continued employment at the end of that period. The final determination of the number of shares to be issued in respect of an award is determined by our Board of Directors, or a committee of our Board.

     The fair value of each performance share is based on the closing price of our Class A stock on the date of grant and is amortized to compensation expense over its vesting period, if achievement of the performance measures is considered probable. We estimate that the performance measures will be achieved and recognized $0.1 million of costs during the quarter ended March 30, 2007 which are included in “Engineering, selling and administrative expenses.” At March 30, 2007, there were 141,200 performance shares outstanding.

     A summary of the status of our performance shares at March 30, 2007, and changes during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007, are as follows:

						Weighted-
						Average
						Grant
		Shares				Price
Performance shares outstanding at July 1, 2006			—			$	—
Performance shares granted			141,200			$	20.40
Performance shares vested			—			$	—
Performance shares forfeited			—			$	—
Performance shares outstanding at March 30, 2007			141,200			$	20.40

     As of March 30, 2007, there was $2.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share awards under our stock incentive plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.25 years. There were no performance shares that vested during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007. The weighted-average grant date price of the 141,200 performance shares granted during the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 was $20.40 per share.

Note O — Business Segments

     Statement 131 established annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s operating segments and related disclosures about geographic information and major customers. Operating segment information for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006 is presented in accordance with Statement 131. We are organized into three operating segments, around the markets we serve: North America microwave, international microwave and network operations. The North America microwave segment designs, manufactures, sells and services microwave radio products, primarily for cellular network providers and private network users within North America. The international microwave segment designs, manufactures, sells and services microwave radio products, primarily for cellular network providers and private network users outside of North America. The network operations segment designs, produces, sells and services network management software systems, primarily for cellular network providers and private network users. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision-Maker (CODM) as defined by Statement 131. Resources are allocated to each of these segments using information based primarily on their operating income (loss). Information related to assets, capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization for the operating segments is not part of the discrete financial information provided to and reviewed by the CODM.

     We evaluate each segment’s performance based on its revenue and operating income (loss), which is defined as revenue less cost of product sales and services and engineering, selling and administrative expenses.

     During the quarter ended March 30, 2007, we recorded $25.3 million in expense related to the acquisition of Stratex including the amortization of intangible assets and the fair value adjustments related to inventory and fixed assets, which primarily affected the North America microwave and international microwave segments. In addition, we incurred $3.6 million restructuring and merger integration charges which primarily affected the North America microwave and international microwave segments. During the second fiscal quarter of 2006, we had a $34.9 million write-down of inventory in the International microwave segment related to product discontinuance.

Note P — Income Taxes

     We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as measured by tax rates at which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax expense (benefit) is the result of changes in the deferred tax assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the available information, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

     Provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:

     The following table summarizes the significant differences between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate and our effective tax rate:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:

     The effective tax rate in the quarter ended March 30, 2007 and in the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 of 1.3% and 8.6%, respectively, was impacted by favorable tax adjustments recorded in purchase accounting offset by unfavorable carve out tax adjustments attributable to MCD. A deferred tax liability in the amount of $16.4 million has been recognized in accordance with SFAS 109 for the difference between the assigned values for purchase accounting purposes and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities acquired as a result of the Stratex Acquisition. This resulted in a $16.4 million increase to goodwill.

     The tax provision recorded in the quarter ended March 30, 2006 represents a carve-out tax provision related to MCD. The tax provision recorded in the three quarters ended March 31, 2006 relates primarily to a valuation allowance established in the period against certain net operating losses we have determined will not be realized subsequent to the decision to cease manufacturing activities in Canada.

     At March 30, 2007, we had $4.9 million of federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforward, which does not expire. We also had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $100 million. The tax loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2024 with no expiration in certain instances.

     For periods prior to January 26, 2007, income tax expense has been determined as if we had been a stand-alone entity, although the actual tax liabilities and tax consequences applied only to Harris. Our income tax expense relates to income taxes paid or to be paid in international jurisdictions for which net operating loss carryforwards were not available and domestic taxable income is deemed offset by tax loss carryforwards for which an income tax valuation allowance had been previously provided for in the financial statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc.

     We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 30, 2007, the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the quarter and three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, the condensed consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

     We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

     Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

     We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the combined balance sheet of The Microwave Communications Division of Harris Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006, and the related combined statements of operations, cash flows, and comprehensive income (loss) and division equity for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated August 28, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those combined financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the combined balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Raleigh, North Carolina
May 4, 2007

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF HARRIS STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

      This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which include, without limitation, statements about the market for our technology, our strategy and competition. Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. For example, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those discussed below under the headings “Overview”, “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies” and under the discussions of “Risk Factors” set forth in the proxy statement/prospectus included in the registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007. All forward looking statements in this document are based on information available to us as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

Acquisition of Stratex Networks, Inc. and Combination with MCD

     On January 26, 2007, Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (the “Company,” “HSTX,” “Harris Stratex,” “we,” “us” and “our”) completed its merger (the “Stratex Acquisition”) with Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”) pursuant to a Formation, Contribution and Merger Agreement among Harris Corporation, Stratex, and Stratex Merger Corp., as amended and restated on December 18, 2006 and amended by letter agreement on January 26, 2007. In the transaction, Stratex Merger Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into Stratex with Stratex as the surviving corporation (renamed as “Harris Stratex Networks Operating Corporation”). Concurrently with the merger of Stratex and Stratex Merger Corp. (the “merger”), Harris Corporation contributed the Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”), along with $32.1 million in cash (comprised of $26.9 million contributed on January 26, 2007 and $5.2 million held by the Company’s foreign operating subsidiaries on January 26, 2007) to the Company (the “contribution transaction”).

     Pursuant to the merger, each share of Stratex common stock was converted into one-fourth of a share of our Class A common stock, and a total of 24,782,153 shares of our Class A common stock were issued to the former holders of Stratex common stock. In the contribution transaction, Harris Corporation contributed the assets of MCD, along with $32.1 million in cash, and in exchange, we assumed certain liabilities of Harris Corporation related to MCD and issued 32,913,377 shares of our Class B common stock to Harris Corporation. As a result of these transactions, Harris Corporation owned approximately 57 percent and the former Stratex shareholders owned approximately 43 percent of the total stock of our outstanding immediately following the closing.

     We completed the Stratex Acquisition to create a leading global communications solutions company offering end-to-end wireless transmission solutions for mobile and fixed-wireless service providers and private networks.

Overview

     The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Harris Stratex, which is sometimes referred to in this Form 10-Q as the MD&A, is provided as a supplement to, should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on page 3 of this report.

     The following is a list of the sections of MD&A, together with the perspective of our management on the contents of these sections of MD&A, which is intended to make reading these pages more productive:

•

Business Considerations — a general description of the Harris Stratex businesses; the value drivers of these businesses and our strategy for achieving value; fiscal 2007 key indicators; and industry-wide opportunities, challenges and risks that are relevant to us in the microwave communications industry.

	•		Operations Review — an analysis of our consolidated results of operations and of the results in each of its three operating segments, to the extent the operating segment results are helpful to gaining an understanding of our business as a whole, for the quarter and three quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006 presented in our financial statements.
	•		Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies — an analysis of cash flows, contractual obligations, off-balance sheet arrangements, commercial commitments, financial risk management, impact of foreign exchange and impact of inflation.
	•		Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — a discussion of accounting policies and estimates that require the most judgment and a discussion of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented by us and their potential impact.

Business Considerations

      General

     MCD was a leading global provider of products and services in point-to-point microwave radio communications. Stratex Networks was a leading provider of innovative wireless transmission solutions to mobile wireless carriers and data access providers around the world. As a result of the combination of the two historical businesses, Harris Stratex was formed and has become a leading independent wireless networks solutions provider focused on providing microwave communications products, systems and services for private network operators and mobile telecommunications providers and turnkey end to end network management and solutions assurance for broadband and converted networks. Our three segments serve markets for microwave products and services in North America (North America microwave), international (international microwave) and network management software solutions worldwide (network operations). We generate revenue, income and cash flows by developing, manufacturing and selling microwave communications products and network management software as well as providing related services. We generally sell products and services directly to our customers. We utilize agents and distributors to sell some products and services, especially in international markets.

     Our mission statement is: “Harris Stratex Networks offers the most reliable, flexible, scalable, and easy to use wireless network solutions in the world for mobile, government and private networks. Every day, we build lasting customer relationships, grow our company and build new value for our shareholders by listening to our customers, delivering innovative products matched to market demand and offering superior service and quality. We’re committed to helping customers meet their competitive demands by building new wireless networks, upgrading existing networks and providing complete professional services.”

      Value Drivers of Harris Stratex Businesses and Strategy for Achieving Value

     We are committed to our mission statement, and we believe that executing the mission statement creates value. Consistent with this commitment, we currently focus on these key value drivers:

	•		Continuing profitable revenue growth in all segments;
	•		Focusing on operating efficiencies and cost reductions;
	•		Maintaining an efficient capital structure.

      Continuing Profitable Revenue Growth in All Segments

     We have endeavored to capitalize on our strength in the North American market by continuing to win opportunities with public telecommunications providers as well as Federal, state and other private network operators to meet increasing demand for capacity requirements and the demand for high-reliability, high-bandwidth networks that are more secure and better protected against natural and man-made disasters. In addition, we are focused on increasing international revenue by offering new products and expanding regional sales channels to penetrate major regional mobile telecom operators. We offer engineering and other professional services for network planning, systems architecture design and project management as a global competitive advantage.

      Focusing on Operating Efficiencies and Cost Reductions

     The principal focus areas for operating efficiencies and cost management are: reducing procurement costs through an emphasis on coordinated supply chain management, reducing product costs through dedicated engineering resources focused on product design, improving manufacturing efficiencies across all segments, and optimizing facility utilization.

      Maintaining an Efficient Capital Structure

     Our capital structure is intended to optimize our cost of capital. We believe a strong capital position, access to key financial markets, ability to raise funds at a low effective cost and overall low cost of borrowing provide a competitive advantage. We had $95.2 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments as of March 30, 2007

      Key Indicators

     We believe that these value drivers, when fully implemented, will improve key indicators such as: net income, revenue, gross profit margin, operating cash flows, total assets as a percentage of revenue and total equity as a percentage of revenue.

      Industry-Wide Opportunities, Challenges and Risks

     Our business operating results and cash flows are affected by global trends and developments in the microwave communications markets, including the following:

	•		Continuing build-out of new networks in emerging markets to meet rapid subscriber growth;
	•		Increasing demand for microwave communications due to build-outs for third-generation (“3G”) services rapidly increasing number of cell sites;
	•		Increasing demand to support capacity needs for new triple-play services;
	•		Continuing fixed-line to mobile-line substitution;
	•		Private networks and public telecommunications operators building high-reliability, high-bandwidth data networks that are more secure and better protected against natural and man-made disasters;
	•		Continuing global mobile operator consolidation; and
	•		The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, mandate for a 2 GHz relocation project beginning in calendar 2007.

     We believe that our experience and capabilities are well aligned with, and positioned to capitalize on, these market trends and developments. While we believe that these developments generally will impact our business favorably going forward, we face a number of risks associated with the markets for our products and services, such as:

	•		The ability to minimize the disruption of the merger and related integration on direct and indirect sales channels:
	•		Slow market adoption of digital radio or any of our new products;
	•		The failure to obtain and retain expected synergies from the merger;
	•		Rates of success in executing, managing and integrating key acquisitions and transactions, including the integration of the operations, personnel and business of Stratex with those of MCD;
	•		The ability to achieve our business plans;
	•		The ability to manage and maintain key customer relationships;
	•		Quarter-to-quarter changes in order input from our major customers and the associate variability in revenues, operating income and net income;
	•		The ability to fund debt service obligations through operating cash flow;

	•		The ability to obtain additional financing in the future and react to competitive and technological changes;
	•		The ability to comply with restrictive covenants in our indebtedness;
	•		The ability to compete with a range of other providers of microwave communications products and services;
	•		The effect of technological changes on our businesses;
	•		The ability to maintain projected product rollouts, product functionality or market acceptance of new products that we may introduce;
	•		The extent to which our future earnings will be sufficient to cover fixed charges;
	•		The effect of competition; our failure to protect our intellectual property rights; currency and interest rate risks;
	•		Pricing pressure on our products and services;
	•		The impact of political, economic and geographic risks on international sales;
	•		The ability to retain our principal sources of revenue, and:
	•		Future changes in prices for our products and services.