Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 000-19627
 
BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  87-0442441
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
4 Cromwell
Irvine, California 92618
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(949) 361-1200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes o No þ
     Number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, as of May 7, 2007: 23,810,901
 
 

 


 

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INDEX
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    16  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    23  
 
       
       
 
       
    23  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    26  
 
       
    27  
  EXHIBIT 10.1
  EXHIBIT 31.1
  EXHIBIT 31.2
  EXHIBIT 32.1
  EXHIBIT 32.2
BIOLASE ® , Millennium ® , Pulsemaster ® and Waterlase ® are registered trademarks of Biolase Technology, Inc., and LaserSmile , Diolase Plus , Comfort Jet , ezlase , HydroPhotonics , LaserPal , MD Flow , YSGG , Soft Touch , Waterlase MD , HydroBeam , SensaTouch and Oculase are trademarks of BIOLASE Technology, Inc. All other product and company names are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective companies.

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 12,789     $ 14,676  
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,207 and $1,357 in 2007 and 2006, respectively
    12,286       15,193  
Inventory, net
    8,879       7,774  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1,483       1,346  
 
           
Total current assets
    35,437       38,989  
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
    4,717       4,851  
Intangible assets, net
    1,379       1,469  
Goodwill
    2,926       2,926  
Deferred tax asset
    36       35  
Other assets
    309       308  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 44,804     $ 48,578  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 7,306     $ 7,699  
Accrued liabilities
    6,785       8,560  
Deferred revenue, current portion
    5,277       5,431  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    19,368       21,690  
Deferred tax liabilities
    290       271  
Deferred revenue, long-term
    3,861       4,278  
Other liabilities, long-term
    518       373  
 
           
Total liabilities
    24,037       26,612  
 
           
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, 1,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
           
Common stock, par value $0.001, 50,000 shares authorized; 25,771 and 25,741 shares issued and 23,808 and 23,777 shares outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively
    26       26  
Additional paid-in capital
    111,973       111,415  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    230       108  
Accumulated deficit
    (75,063 )     (73,184 )
 
           
 
    37,166       38,365  
Treasury stock (cost of 1,964 shares repurchased)
    (16,399 )     (16,399 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    20,767       21,966  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 44,804     $ 48,578  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Products and services revenue
  $ 14,100     $ 16,784  
License fees and royalty revenue
    960       96  
 
           
Net revenue
    15,060       16,880  
Cost of revenue
    6,923       8,116  
 
           
Gross profit
    8,137       8,764  
 
           
Other income, net
          16  
 
           
Operating expenses:
               
Sales and marketing
    6,393       6,080  
General and administrative
    2,377       3,289  
Engineering and development
    1,210       1,198  
Patent infringement legal settlement
          432  
 
           
Total operating expenses
    9,980       10,999  
 
           
Loss from operations
    (1,843 )     (2,219 )
Non-operating income, net
    189       17  
 
           
Loss before income tax provision
    (1,654 )     (2,202 )
Income tax provision
    69       82  
 
           
Net loss
  $ (1,723 )   $ (2,284 )
 
           
Net loss per share:
               
Basic
  $ (0.07 )   $ (0.10 )
 
           
Diluted
  $ (0.07 )   $ (0.10 )
 
           
Shares used in the calculation of net loss per share:
               
Basic
    23,791       23,272  
 
           
Diluted
    23,791       23,272  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
               
Net loss
  $ (1,723 )   $ (2,284 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    456       474  
Loss on disposal of assets, net
          (16 )
(Recovery) provision for bad debts
    (76 )     126  
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
          66  
Stock-based compensation
    361       199  
Issuance of common stock for patent litigation settlement
          432  
Deferred income taxes
    19       35  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    3,006       (1,675 )
Inventory
    (1,105 )     909  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (134 )     31  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    (2,160 )     617  
Deferred revenue
    (572 )     (257 )
 
           
Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities
    (1,928 )     (1,343 )
 
           
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
               
Additions to property, plant and equipment
    (220 )     (1,108 )
 
           
Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities
    (220 )     (1,108 )
 
           
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
               
Borrowings under line of credit
          5,370  
Payments under line of credit
          (5,370 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants
    197       203  
 
           
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities
    197       203  
 
           
Effect of exchange rate changes
    64       (50 )
 
           
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,887 )     (2,298 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
    14,676       8,272  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 12,789     $ 5,974  
 
           
 
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 16     $ 149  
 
           
Income taxes
  $ 23     $ 3  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company
     BIOLASE Technology Inc. (the “Company” or “Biolase”), incorporated in Delaware in 1987, is a medical technology company operating in one business segment that designs, manufactures and markets advanced dental, cosmetic and surgical lasers and related products.
Basis of Presentation
     The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BIOLASE Technology, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and have been prepared on a basis consistent with the December 31, 2006 audited consolidated financial statements and include all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and the elimination of all material intercompany transactions and balances, necessary to fairly present the information set forth therein. These unaudited, interim, consolidated financial statements do not include all the footnotes, presentations and disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Use of Estimates
     The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Significant estimates in these consolidated financial statements include allowances on accounts receivable, inventory and deferred taxes, as well as estimates for accrued warranty expenses, the realizability of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, effects of stock-based compensation and the provision or benefit for income taxes. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may differ materially from those estimates.
NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
     In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (“ FAS 157” ). FAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this standard relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not believe that the adoption of the provisions of FAS 157 will materially impact our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement 115 that provides companies with an option to report certain financial assets and liabilities in their entirety at fair value. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The fair value option may be applied instrument by instrument, and may be applied only to entire instruments. A business entity would report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. We are evaluating our options provided for under this statement and their potential impact on our consolidated financial statements when implemented. This statement is being reviewed in conjunction with the requirements of FAS 157 discussed above.
NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND PER SHARE INFORMATION
Stock-Based Compensation
     We have three stock-based compensation plans — the 1990 Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1990 and 1993 Stock Option Plans have been terminated with respect to granting additional stock options. Under these plans, stock options are awarded to certain officers, directors and employees of the Company at the discretion of the Company’s management and/or Board of Directors. Options to employees generally vest on a quarterly basis over three years.

6


Table of Contents

     Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of FAS 123 (revised), Share-Based Payment or FAS 123R using a modified prospective transition method. Compensation cost related to stock options recognized in operating results under FAS 123R during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, was $361,000 and $199,000, respectively. The net impact to earnings for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $(.01) and $(.01) per basic and diluted share, respectively. At March 31, 2007, we had $1,613,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under our existing plans. We expect that cost to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.
     The following table summarizes the income statement classification of compensation expense associated with share-based payments (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Cost of revenue
  $ 44     $ 17  
Sales and marketing
    92       42  
General and administrative
    201       134  
Engineering and development
    24       6  
 
           
 
  $ 361     $ 199  
 
           
     The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Our options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. For options granted prior and subsequent to January 1, 2006, we did and expect to continue to estimate their fair values using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This option pricing model requires us to make several assumptions regarding the key variables used in the model to calculate the fair value of its stock options. The risk-free interest rate used by us is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect for the expected lives of the options at their dates of grant. Beginning July 1, 2005, we have used a dividend yield of zero as we do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The most critical assumption used in calculating the fair value of stock options is the expected volatility of our common stock. We believe that the historic volatility of our common stock is a reliable indicator of future volatility, and accordingly, have used a stock volatility factor based on the historical volatility of our common stock over a period of time approximating the estimated lives of our stock options. The expected term is estimated by analyzing our historical share option exercise experience over a five year period, in accordance with the provisions of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. Compensation expense is recognized using the straight-line method for all stock-based awards issued after January 1, 2006 or unvested as of January 1, 2006. Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant based on our historical experience and future expectations. FAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of the grant and revised as necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
     The stock option fair values were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2007   2006
Expected term (years)
    4.46       4.00  
Volatility
    58 %     58 %
Annual dividend per share
  $ 0.00     $ 0.00  
Risk-free interest rate
    4.59 %     4.54 %

7


Table of Contents

A summary of option activity under our stock option plans for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted average        
            Weighted     remaining        
            average     contractual term     Aggregate intrinsic  
    Shares     exercise price     (years)     value  
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
    3,858,000     $ 6.75              
Plus: Options granted
    42,000     $ 8.71              
Less:
                               
Options exercised
    (30,000 )   $ 6.46              
Options canceled or expired
    (70,000 )   $ 7.66              
 
                             
Options outstanding at March 31, 2007
    3,800,000     $ 6.76       5.84     $ 13,761,000  
 
                             
Options exercisable at March 31, 2007
    3,294,000     $ 6.56       5.30     $ 12,854,000  
Options expired during the quarter ended March 31, 2007
    30,000     $ 7.98                
     Cash proceeds along with fair value disclosures related to grants, exercises and vesting options are provided in the following table (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2007   2006
Proceeds from stock options exercised
  $ 197     $ 203  
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised (1)
    N/A       N/A  
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised (2)
  $ 66     $ 73  
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during period
  $ 4.50     $ 3.91  
Total fair value of shares vested during the period
  $ 424     $ 222  
 
(1)   FAS 123R requires that the excess tax benefits received related to stock option exercises be presented as financing cash inflows. We currently do not receive a tax benefit related to the exercise of stock options due to our net operating losses.
 
(2)   The intrinsic value of stock options exercised is the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant.
     A summary of the status of our unvested options as of December 31, 2006, and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2007, is presented below:
                 
            Weighted-Average Grant-  
Unvested Options   Options     Date Fair Value  
Unvested options at December 31, 2006
    598,000     $ 4.11  
Granted
    42,000     $ 4.50  
Vested
    (94,000 )   $ 4.46  
Forfeited
    (40,000 )   $ 3.76  
 
             
Unvested options at March 31, 2007
    506,000     $ 4.10  
 
             
Net Loss Per Share — Basic and Diluted
     Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In computing diluted loss per share, the weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to reflect the effect of potentially dilutive securities.
     Outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase 3,881,000 and 4,443,000 shares were not considered in the calculation of diluted loss per share amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 — INVENTORY
     Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market (determined by the first-in, first-out method) and is comprised of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Raw materials
  $ 2,773     $ 2,554  
Work-in-process
    1,571       663  
Finished goods
    4,535       4,557  
 
           
Inventory, net
  $ 8,879     $ 7,774  
 
           
     Inventory is net of the provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $665,000 and $683,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
NOTE 5 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
     Property, plant and equipment, net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Land
  $ 319     $ 315  
Building
    875       867  
Leasehold improvements
    938       938  
Equipment and computers
    4,707       4,436  
Furniture and fixtures
    945       934  
Construction in progress
    5       62  
 
           
 
    7,789       7,552  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (3,072 )     (2,701 )
 
           
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 4,717     $ 4,851  
 
           
     Depreciation expense was $366,000 and $381,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
     Leasehold improvements include $569,000 of tenant improvements paid by the landlord in connection with the facility lease during 2006.
NOTE 6 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
     In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization but are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. We conducted our annual impairment analysis of goodwill and trade names as of June 30, 2006 and concluded there had not been any impairment. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, no triggering events have occurred that would have a material effect on the value of these assets
     Intangible assets with finite lives continue to be subject to amortization, and any impairment is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . We believe no event has occurred that would trigger an impairment of these intangible assets. We recorded amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 of $90,000 and $93,000, respectively. Other intangible assets consist of an acquired customer list and a non-compete agreement.

9


Table of Contents

     The following table presents details of the Company’s intangible assets, related accumulated amortization and goodwill (in thousands):
                                                                 
    As of March 31, 2007     As of December 31, 2006  
            Accumulated                             Accumulated              
    Gross     Amortization     Impairment     Net     Gross     Amortization     Impairment     Net  
Patents (4-10 years)
  $ 1,814     $ (848 )   $     $ 966     $ 1,814     $ (786 )   $     $ 1,028  
Trademarks (6 years)
    69       (69 )                 69       (69 )            
Trade names (Indefinite life)
    979             (747 )     232       979             (747 )     232  
Other (4 to 6 years)
    593       (412 )           181       593       (384 )           209  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Total
  $ 3,455     $ (1,329 )   $ (747 )   $ 1,379     $ 3,455     $ (1,239 )   $ (747 )   $ 1,469  
 
                                               
Goodwill
                                                               
(Indefinite life)
  $ 2,926                     $ 2,926     $ 2,926                     $ 2,926  
 
                                                       
NOTE 7 –ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED REVENUE
     Accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
Payroll and benefits
  $ 2,028     $ 2,584  
Warranty
    2,371       2,398  
Sales tax
    209       179  
Deferred rent credit
    112       112  
Accrued professional services
    751       1,055  
Accrued insurance premium
    539       890  
Other
    775       1,342  
 
           
Accrued liabilities
  $ 6,785     $ 8,560  
 
           
     Changes in the product warranty accrual, including expenses incurred under our warranties, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Initial warranty accrual, beginning balance
  $ 2,398     $ 1,211  
Provision for estimated warranty cost
    791       1,076  
Warranty expenditures
    (818 )     (946 )
 
           
Initial warranty accrual, ending balance
  $ 2,371     $ 1,341  
 
           

10


Table of Contents

Deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
License fee from Henry Schein, Inc. – unamortized portion
  $ 4,028     $ 4,444  
License fee and royalty advances from Procter & Gamble
    3,000       3,000  
Undelivered elements (training and installation)
    671       818  
Extended warranty contracts
    1,439       1,447  
 
           
Total deferred revenue
    9,138       9,709  
 
           
Less long-term amounts:
               
License fee from Henry Schein, Inc.
    2,361       2,778  
License fee and royalty advances from Procter & Gamble
    1,500       1,500  
 
           
Total deferred revenue, long term
    3,861       4,278  
 
           
Total deferred revenue, current portion
  $ 5,277     $ 5,431  
 
           
     On August 8, 2006, we entered into a License and Distribution Agreement with Henry Schein, Inc., or HSIC, a large distributor of healthcare products to office-based practitioners, pursuant to which we granted HSIC the exclusive right to distribute our complete line of dental laser systems, accessories and services in the United States and Canada. Concurrent with the execution of the Agreement, HSIC paid an upfront license fee of $5.0 million. The Agreement has an initial term of three years, following which HSIC has the option to extend the Agreement for an additional three-year period under certain circumstances, including its satisfaction of the minimum purchase requirements during the full three-year period, and for an additional license fee of $5.0 million. We are amortizing the initial $5.0 million payment to License Fees and Royalty Revenue on a straight-line basis over the three-year term of the Agreement.
     Under the Agreement, HSIC is obligated to meet certain minimum purchase requirements and is entitled to receive incentive payments if certain purchase targets are achieved. If HSIC has not met the minimum purchase requirements at the midpoint of each of the first two three-year periods, we will have the option, upon repayment of a portion of the license fee, to (i) shorten the remaining term of the Agreement to one year, (ii) grant distribution rights held by HSIC to other persons (or distribute products ourselves), (iii) reduce certain discounts on products given to HSIC under the Agreement and (iv) cease paying future incentive payments. We maintain the right to grant certain intellectual property rights to third parties, but by doing so may incur the obligation to refund a portion of the upfront license fee to HSIC.
     On June 29, 2006, we received a one-time payment from The Procter & Gamble Company, or P&G, of $3.0 million for a license to certain of our patents pursuant to a binding letter agreement, subsequently replaced by a definitive agreement effective January 24, 2007, which was recorded as deferred revenue when received. In the event of a material uncured breach of the definitive agreement by us, we could be required to refund certain payments made to us under the agreement, including the $3.0 million payment. The license fee from P&G is being amortized over a two-year period beginning in January 2007. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, $375,000 of the license fee was recognized in license fees and royalty revenue. Additionally, P&G is required to make quarterly payments to us in the amount of $250,000, beginning with a payment for the third quarter of 2006 and continuing until the first product which reads on the patents licensed is shipped by P&G for large-scale commercial distribution in the United States. Seventy-five percent of each $250,000 payment is being treated as prepaid royalties and is being credited against royalty payments owed to us, and the remainder is being credited to revenue in the period earned. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, $125,000 of the payments received was recognized in license fees and royalty revenue.
NOTE 8—BANK LINE OF CREDIT AND DEBT
     On September 28, 2006, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) with Comerica Bank (the “Lender”) which replaced the loan agreement previously held with Bank of the West (“BOW”). Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed to extend a revolving loan (the “Revolving Line”) to us in the maximum principal amount of $10.0 million. Advances under the Revolving Line may not exceed the lesser of $10.0 million or the Borrowing Base (80% of eligible accounts receivable and 35% of eligible inventory), less any amounts outstanding under letters of credit or foreign exchange contract reserves. Notwithstanding the foregoing, advances of up to $6.0 million may be made without regard to the Borrowing Base. The entire unpaid principal amount plus any accrued but unpaid interest and all other amounts due under the Loan Agreement are due and payable in full on September 28, 2008 (the “Maturity Date”), but can be extended by us for an additional year upon Lender approval. Our obligations under the Loan Agreement bear interest on the outstanding daily

11


Table of Contents

balance thereof at one of the following rates, to be selected by us: (i) LIBOR plus 2.50%, or (ii) prime rate, as announced by the Lender, plus 0.25%. As security for the payment and performance of our obligations under the Loan Agreement, we granted the Lender a first priority security interest in existing and later-acquired Collateral (as defined in the Loan Agreement, and which excludes intellectual property).
     The Loan Agreement requires compliance with certain financial covenants, including: (i) minimum effective tangible net worth; (ii) maximum leverage ratio; (iii) minimum cash amount at Lender of $6.0 million; and (iv) minimum liquidity ratio. The Loan Agreement also contains covenants that require Lender’s prior written consent for us, among other things, to: (i) transfer any part of its business or property; (ii) make any changes in our location or name, or replace our CEO or CFO; (iii) consummate mergers or acquisitions; (iv) incur liens; or, (v) pay dividends or repurchase stock. The Loan Agreement contains customary events of default, any one of which will result in the right of the Lender to, among other things, accelerate all obligations under the Loan Agreement, set-off obligations under the Loan Agreement against any balances or deposits of ours held by the bank, or sell the Collateral. We were in compliance with such financial covenants as of March 31, 2007.
     As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, no amounts were outstanding under the Loan Agreement.
     Certain subsidiaries of ours have entered into unconditional guaranties, dated as of September 28, 2006, pursuant to which such subsidiaries have guaranteed the payment and performance of our obligations under the Loan Agreement.
     In December 2006, we financed $890,000 of insurance premiums payable in ten equal monthly installments of approximately $91,000 each, including a finance charge of 5.89%. As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately $539,000 remaining as outstanding.
NOTE 9—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
     In August 2004, we and certain of our officers were named as defendants in several putative shareholder class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaints purport to seek unspecified damages on behalf of an alleged class of persons who purchased our common stock between October 29, 2003 and July 16, 2004. The complaints allege that we and our officers violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose material information about the demand for our products and the fact that we would not achieve the alleged forecasted growth. The claimed misrepresentations include certain statements in our press releases and the registration statement we filed in connection with our public offering of common stock in March 2004. In January 2006, defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended consolidated class action complaint was granted and the action was dismissed, with leave to further amend, by the order of the Honorable David O. Carter, United States District Judge for the Central District of California. On March 10, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint. The third amended complaint makes the same allegations regarding violations of the federal securities laws but is limited to an alleged class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock pursuant to or traceable to the public offering of our common stock that closed in March 2004. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss that complaint and on July 25, 2006, the Court ruled on the motion, granting the motion on the grounds that lead plaintiffs lack standing, denying the motion on the grounds that the complaint fails to state a claim and allowing plaintiffs to file a fourth amended complaint and a motion to appoint new lead plaintiffs. On August 23, 2006, plaintiffs filed a fourth amended complaint which defendants answered on October 20, 2006. In addition, in August 2004, three stockholders filed derivative lawsuits in the Superior Court in Orange County, California seeking recovery on our behalf and alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty by two officers and by the members of our Board of Directors, who were named as defendants. The cases were consolidated and the plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action raised claims on our behalf that include alleged misrepresentations in 2003 and 2004 as to the demand for our products, our financial results and future prospects. In both the class action and the derivative suit the parties have entered into settlement agreements, subject to court approval.
     On April 20, 2007, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Derivative Stipulation”) in which they agreed to settle the derivative litigation. Under the Derivative Stipulation, in exchange for a release of all claims against the defendant officers and directors that were or could have been alleged in the complaints in the derivative cases and dismissal of the derivative suit, our directors and officers liability insurance carrier will pay on behalf of the individual defendants $500,000 to or as directed by us (including a $100,000 attorney’s fee to plaintiff) and we have agreed to adopt or maintain certain corporate governance measures described in the Derivative Stipulation. The Derivative Stipulation and a motion for approval of the settlement were filed in the Orange County Superior Court on April 24, 2007. On June 8, 2007 at 10 a.m., the Court, located at Department CX104 of the Orange County Superior Court, Complex Civil Center, 751 West Santa Ana

12


Table of Contents

Blvd., Santa Ana, California 92701, will hold a hearing on the motion for final approval of the settlement of the derivative action and also for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. If no stockholder objects and the Court approves the Derivative Stipulation, all stockholders will be barred from contesting the fairness or adequacy of the proposed settlement and from pursuing the settled derivative claims.
     On April 23, 2007, the Court in the federal class action entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement of the class action, as contained in a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Class Stipulation”) filed with the Court. A hearing on whether to approve the settlement is set for August 6, 2007. Under the Class Stipulation, in exchange for a release of all claims and dismissal of the litigation, our directors and officers liability insurance carrier will pay $1,950,000 in cash to fund payments to the class members, net of fees and costs to plaintiffs’ counsel. Such amount includes the amount the carrier will pay to settle the derivative action as discussed in the preceding paragraph. As a result, there will be no cost to us. In the settlement agreements, the defendants admit no wrongdoing. Consummation of the settlements is, as noted, subject to court approval. As of March 31, 2007, no amounts have been recorded in the consolidated financial statements for these matters since management believes that it is not probable we have incurred a loss contingency.
     In January 2005, we acquired the intellectual property portfolio of Diodem, LLC, or Diodem, consisting of certain U.S. and international patents of which four were asserted against us, and settled the existing litigation between us and Diodem, for consideration of $3.0 million in cash, 361,664 shares of common stock (valued at the common stock fair market value on the closing date of the transaction for a total of approximately $3.5 million) and a five-year warrant exercisable into 81,037 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.06 per share. In addition, 45,208 additional shares of common stock were placed in escrow, to be released to Diodem, if certain criteria specified in the purchase agreement were satisfied in or before July 2006. As of March 31, 2006, we determined that it was probable that these shares of common stock would be released from escrow in or before July 2006. Accordingly, we recorded a patent infringement legal settlement charge of approximately $348,000 in 2006. In July 2006, we released these shares from escrow. The common stock issued, the escrow shares of common stock and the warrant shares have certain registration rights. The total consideration had an estimated value of approximately $7.4 million including the value of the patents acquired in January 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we accrued approximately $6.4 million for the settlement of the existing litigation with $3.0 million included in current liabilities and $3.4 million recorded as a long-term liability. In January 2005, we recorded an intangible asset of $0.5 million representing the estimated fair value of the intellectual property acquired. The estimated fair value of the patents was determined with the assistance of an independent evaluation expert using a relief from royalty and a discounted cash flow methodology. As a result of the acquisition, Diodem immediately withdrew its patent infringement claims against us and the case was formally dismissed on May 31, 2005. We did not pay and have no obligation to pay any royalties to Diodem on past or future sales of our products, but we agreed to pay additional consideration if any of the acquired patents held by us are licensed to a third party. In order to secure performance by us of these financial obligations, the parties entered into an intellectual property security agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the rights of existing creditors and the rights of any future creditors to the extent provided in the agreement, we granted Diodem a security interest in all of their rights, title and interest in the royalty patents.
     In February 2005, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Refocus Group, Inc. in order to obtain declaratory relief that certain of our planned activities in the field of presbyopia will not infringe the claims of a patent held by Refocus and/or that the Refocus claims are invalid. These claims were dismissed by the court in July 2005 without prejudice on the basis that we do not have a product that has been commercialized and, therefore, Refocus’ alleged infringement claims are not ripe. Once we have a commercial product in the field of presbyopia, we intend to renew our claim against Refocus. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in a lawsuit against Refocus. If we are not successful in such a lawsuit, we may not be able to market our presbyopia product or we may have to license certain patents from Refocus.
     From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings incidental to our business, but at this time we are not party to any other litigation that is material to our business.
Securities and Exchange Commission Inquiry
     Following the restatement of our financial statements in September 2003, we received, in late October 2003, and subsequently in 2003 and 2004, informal requests from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to voluntarily provide information relating to the restatement. We have provided information to the SEC and intend to continue to cooperate in responding to the inquiry. In accordance with its normal practice, the SEC has not advised us when its inquiry may be concluded, and we are unable to predict the outcome of this inquiry.

13


Table of Contents

NOTE 10— SEGMENT INFORMATION
     We currently operate in a single business segment. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, sales in Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) accounted for approximately 8% of net revenue, and sales in Canada, Asia, Latin America and Pacific Rim countries accounted for approximately 34% of net revenue. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, sales in EMEA accounted for approximately 15% of net revenue, and sales in Canada, Asia, Latin America and Pacific Rim countries accounted for approximately 23% of net revenue.
     Net revenue by geographic location based on the location of customers was as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
United States
  $ 8,697     $ 10,428  
Europe, Middle East, Africa
    1,237       2,559  
Canada, Asia, Latin America and Pacific Rim
    5,126       3,893  
 
           
 
  $ 15,060     $ 16,880  
 
           
     Long-lived assets located outside of the United States at our foreign subsidiaries were $1.2 million and $1.2 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
NOTE 11—CONCENTRATIONS
     Revenue from our Waterlase systems, our principal product, comprised 74% and 75% of total net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenue from our Diode system comprised 6% and 7% of total revenue for the same periods.
     Approximately 64% of our revenue in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was generated through sales to HSIC. Prior to entering into the distribution agreement with HSIC, many dentists financed their purchases through third-party leasing companies. In these transactions, the leasing company was the purchaser. Approximately 31% of our revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2006 was generated from National Technology Leasing Corporation (“NTL”), who purchased laser systems from us and leased them to dentists. One international distributor accounted for approximately 17% of our revenues in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and 10% of our revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
     We maintain our cash and cash equivalents accounts with established commercial banks. Such cash deposits periodically exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit of $100,000 for each account.
     Accounts receivable concentrations have resulted from sales to HSIC and one international distributor that totaled $7.2 million and $1.6 million or 54.0% and 12.1%, respectively, at March 31, 2007. Accounts receivable concentrations from sales to HSIC and one international distributor totaled $10.4 million and $1.5 million or 68.7% and 10%, respectively, at December 31, 2006.
     We currently buy certain key components of our products from single suppliers. Although there are a limited number of manufacturers of these key components, management believes that other suppliers could provide similar key components on comparable terms. A change in suppliers, however, could cause a delay in manufacturing and a possible loss of sales, which would adversely affect consolidated operating results.

14


Table of Contents

NOTE 12—COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
     Components of comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Net loss
  $ (1,723 )   $ (2,284 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income items:
               
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
          (125 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (230 )     90  
 
           
Comprehensive loss
  $ (1,953 )   $ (2,319 )
 
           
NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES
     In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007, as required. We have elected to classify interest and penalties as a component of our income tax provision. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a $156,000 liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase in the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded an increase of $17,000 in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including related estimates of penalties and interest.
NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT
     On May 9, 2007, we entered into Addendum 1 to License and Distribution Agreement with HSIC, which addendum is effective as of April 1, 2007 and modifies the License and Distribution Agreement entered into with HSIC on August 8, 2006, to add the terms and conditions under which HSIC has the exclusive right to distribute our new ezlase diode dental laser system in the United States and Canada. In the Addendum, separate minimum purchase requirements are established for the ezlase . If HSIC has not met the minimum purchase requirement for any 12-month period ending on March 31, we will have the option, upon 30 days written notice, to (i) convert ezlase distribution rights to a non-exclusive basis for a minimum period of one year, after which period we would have the option to withdraw ezlase distribution rights, and (ii) reduce the distributor discount on ezlase products.

15


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
     This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements pertaining to financial items, plans, strategies or objectives of management for future operations, our financial condition or prospects, and any other statement that is not historical fact, including any statement using terminology such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “plan,” or the negativities of these terms or other comparable terminology. For all of the foregoing forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are only predictions and actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations for a number of reasons including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this quarterly report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. These forward-looking statements represent our judgment as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
      The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read together with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements for the year ended December 31, 2006. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in any forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.
Overview
     We are a medical technology company that develops, manufactures and markets lasers and related products focused on technologies for improved applications and procedures in dentistry and medicine. In particular, our principal products provide dental laser systems that allow dentists, periodontists, endodontists, oral surgeons and other specialists to perform a broad range of dental procedures, including cosmetic and complex surgical applications. Our systems are designed to provide clinically superior performance for many types of dental procedures, with less pain and faster recovery times than are generally achieved with drills, scalpels and other dental instruments. We have clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, to market our laser systems in the United States and also have the necessary approvals to sell our laser systems in Canada, the European Union and certain other international markets.
     We offer two categories of laser system products: (i) Waterlase system and (ii) Diode system. Our flagship product category, the Waterlase system, uses a patented combination of water and laser to perform most procedures currently performed using dental drills, scalpels and other traditional dental instruments for cutting soft and hard tissue. We also offer a family of Diode laser system products to perform soft tissue and cosmetic procedures, including tooth whitening.
     On August 8, 2006, we entered into a License and Distribution Agreement with Henry Schein, Inc., or HSIC, a large distributor of healthcare products to office-based practitioners, pursuant to which we granted HSIC the exclusive right to distribute our complete line of dental laser systems, accessories and services in the United States and Canada. The agreement has an initial term of three years, following which it will automatically renew for an additional period of three years, provided that HSIC has achieved its minimum purchase requirements and for an additional license fee of $5.0 million. Under the agreement, HSIC is obligated to meet certain minimum purchase requirements and is entitled to receive incentive payments if certain purchase targets are achieved. If HSIC has not met the minimum purchase requirements at the midpoint of each of the first two three-year periods, we will have the option, upon repayment of a portion of the license fee, to (i) shorten the remaining term of the agreement to one year, (ii) grant distribution rights held by HSIC to other persons (or distribute products ourself), (iii) reduce certain discounts on products given to HSIC under the agreement and (iv) cease paying future incentive payments. We maintain the right to grant certain intellectual property rights to third parties, but by doing so may incur the obligation to refund a portion of the upfront license fee to HSIC.
     We intend to augment the activities of HSIC in the United States and Canada with the efforts of our direct sales force; however, our future revenue will be largely dependent upon the efforts and success of HSIC in selling our products. Since September 1, 2006, nearly all of our domestic sales were made through HSIC and we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future. We cannot assure you that HSIC will devote sufficient resources to selling our products or, even if sufficient resources are directed to our products, that such efforts will be sufficient to increase net revenue.
Subsequent Event
     On May 9, 2007, we entered into Addendum 1 to License and Distribution Agreement with HSIC, which addendum is effective as of April 1, 2007 and modifies the License and Distribution Agreement entered into with HSIC on August 8, 2006, to add the terms and conditions under which HSIC has the exclusive right to distribute our new ezlase diode dental laser system in the United States and Canada. In the Addendum, separate minimum purchase requirements are established for the ezlase . If HSIC has not met the minimum purchase requirement for any 12-month period ending on March 31, we will have the option, upon 30 days written notice, to (i) convert ezlase distribution rights to a non-exclusive basis for a minimum period of one year, after which period we would have the option to withdraw ezlase distribution rights, and (ii) reduce the distributor discount on ezlase products.

16


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. The following is a summary of those accounting policies that we believe are necessary to understand and evaluate our reported consolidated financial results.
      Revenue Recognition. Effective September 1, 2006, nearly all of our domestic sales are to HSIC; prior to this date, we sold our products directly to customers through our direct sales force. Internationally, we sell products through direct sales representatives and through distributors. We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition , which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to our customer, or services have been rendered; (iii) the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
     We apply Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables , which requires us to evaluate whether the separate deliverables in our arrangements can be unbundled, in our revenue recognition. Sales of our Waterlase systems include separate deliverables consisting of the product, disposables used with the Waterlase system, installation and training. For these sales, we apply the residual value method, which requires us to allocate to the delivered elements the total arrangement consideration less the fair value of the undelivered elements. Sales of our Diode systems include separate deliverables consisting of the product, disposables and training. For these sales, we apply the relative fair value method, which requires us to allocate the total arrangement consideration to the relative fair value of each element. Deferred revenue attributable to the undelivered elements, primarily training and installation, are included in deferred revenue when the product is shipped and are recognized when the related service is performed or upon expiration of time offered under the agreement.
     The key judgment related to our revenue recognition relates to the collectibility of payment from the customer. We evaluate the customer’s credit worthiness prior to the shipment of the product. Based on our assessment of the credit information available to us, we may determine the credit risk is higher than normally acceptable, and we will either decline the purchase or defer the revenue until payment is reasonably assured.
     Although all sales are final, we accept returns of products in certain, limited circumstances and record a provision for sales returns based on historical experience concurrent with the recognition of revenue. The sales returns allowance is recorded as a reduction of accounts receivable and revenue.
     We recognize revenue for royalties under licensing agreements for our patented technology when the product using our technology is sold. We estimate and recognize the amount earned based on historical performance and current knowledge about the business operations of our licensees. Our estimates have been consistent with amounts historically reported by the licensees.
      Accounting for Stock-Based Payments . Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard 123 (revised), Share-Based Payment , or FAS 123R, using the modified prospective transition method. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107, or SAB 107, regarding the SEC Staff’s interpretation of FAS 123R, which provides the Staff’s views regarding interactions between FAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. We have incorporated the provisions of SAB 107 in the adoption of FAS 123R.
      Valuation of Accounts Receivable. We maintain an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable to estimate the risk of extending credit to customers. We evaluate our allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our knowledge of customers and their compliance with credit terms. The evaluation process includes a review of customers’ accounts on a regular basis which incorporates input from sales, service and finance personnel. The review process evaluates all account balances with amounts outstanding 60 days and other specific amounts for which information obtained indicates that the balance may be uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is adjusted based on such evaluation, with a corresponding provision included in general and administrative expenses. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when we feel it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We do not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to our customers.

17


Table of Contents

      Valuation of Inventory. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or market. We periodically evaluate the carrying value of inventory and maintain an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory to adjust the carrying value as necessary to the lower of cost or market. We evaluate quantities on hand, physical condition and technical functionality, as these characteristics may be impacted by anticipated customer demand for current products and new product introductions. Unfavorable changes in estimates of excess and obsolete inventory would result in an increase in cost of revenue and a decrease in gross profit.
      Valuation of Long-Lived Assets. Property, plant and equipment, and certain intangibles with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on our estimate of the period that the assets will generate revenue or otherwise productively support our business goals. We monitor events and changes in circumstances, which could indicate that the carrying balances of long-lived assets may exceed the undiscounted expected future cash flows from those assets. If such a condition were to exist, we would recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.
      Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. We conducted our annual impairment analysis of our goodwill and trade names as of June 30, 2006 and concluded there had been no further impairment in trade names and no impairment in goodwill. During the period June 30, 2006 through March 31, 2007, we reviewed critical indicators and determined that no triggering events occurred that would have a material effect on the value of these assets.
      Warranty Cost. Products sold are covered by a warranty against defects in material and workmanship for a period of up to two years. Estimated warranty expenses are recorded as an accrued liability, with a corresponding charge to cost of revenue. This estimate is recognized concurrent with the recognition of revenue. The accrual is based on our historical experience and our expectation of future conditions. An increase in warranty claims or in the costs associated with servicing those claims would result in an increase in the accrual and a decrease in gross profit.
      Litigation and Other Contingencies. We regularly evaluate our exposure to threatened or pending litigation and other business contingencies. Because of the uncertainties related to the amount of loss from litigation and other business contingencies, the recording of losses relating to such exposures requires significant judgment about the potential range of outcomes. As additional information about current or future litigation or other contingencies becomes available, we will assess whether such information warrants the recording of expense relating to contingencies. To be recorded as expense, a loss contingency must be both probable and reasonably estimable. If a loss contingency is material but is not both probable and estimable, we will disclose the matter in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
      Income Taxes. Based upon our operating losses during 2007 and 2006, and the available evidence, management determined that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized, excluding our foreign deferred tax asset and consequently we maintain a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset, excluding the foreign portion. In this determination, we considered factors such as our earnings history, future projected earnings and tax planning strategies. If sufficient evidence of our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income tax benefits becomes apparent, we may reduce our valuation allowance, resulting in tax benefits in our consolidated statement of operations and in additional paid-in-capital. Management evaluates the potential realization of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for reducing the valuation allowance periodically.
      Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement s. We have no off-balance sheet financing, or contractual arrangements.

18


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
     The following table presents certain data from our consolidated statements of operations expressed as percentages of revenue:
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
               
Net revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of revenue
    46.0       48.1  
 
           
Gross profit
    54.0       51.9  
 
           
Other income, net
          0.1  
 
           
Operating expenses:
               
Sales and marketing
    42.4       36.0  
General and administrative
    15.8       19.4  
Engineering and development
    8.0       7.1  
Patent infringement legal settlement
          2.6  
 
           
Total operating expenses
    66.2       65.1  
 
           
Loss from operations
    (12.2 )     (13.1 )
Non-operating income, net
    1.2       0.1  
 
           
Loss before income taxes
    (11.0 )     (13.0 )
Income tax provision
    0.4       0.5  
 
           
Net loss
    (11.4 )%     (13.5 )%
 
           
Three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
      Net Revenue. Net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $15.1 million, a decrease of $1.8 million, or 11%, as compared with net revenue of $16.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Laser system net revenue decreased by approximately 13% in the first quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same quarter of 2006. We believe that a successful distribution relationship with HSIC will require a substantial investment of time by our sales representatives in identifying and building relationships with the HSIC sales representatives in their territories. During the first quarter of 2007, this activity occurred in the majority of our North American sales territories, and we also experienced a greater than expected turnover rate within our domestic sales force. We believe these activities and the related sales force turnover was largely responsible for the decrease in sales of laser systems. Although we are working to optimize the allocation of our sales representatives’ time between normal selling activities and the relationship-building activities, we expect our sales representatives will continue to devote a significant amount of time to relationship-building activities for the next three to four quarters, and therefore revenue growth rates could continue to be impacted.
     Non-laser system net revenue, which includes consumable products, advanced training programs and extended service contracts, decreased by approximately 28% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006. Primarily responsible for the decrease in non-laser system net revenues was the recognition in the first quarter of 2006 of approximately $727,000 in revenue previously recorded as a deferred revenue obligation that was subsequently determined to have been earned.
     License fees and royalty revenue increased to $960,000 in the first quarter of 2007 from $96,000 in the first quarter of 2006. The increase was generated by the amortization of $917,000 of license fees and related payments received from HSIC and The Procter and Gamble Company, or P&G, partially offset by a reduction in royalty income from licensees.
     Sales of our Waterlase systems comprised 74% and 75% of our net revenue and sales of our Diode laser systems comprised 6% and 7% of our revenue for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. While we expect the Waterlase system to continue to account for the majority of our net revenue, we also expect sales of Diode laser systems in coming quarters to increase, resulting from our new ezlase soft tissue diode laser system, which was launched late in the first quarter of 2007.

19


Table of Contents

     Domestic revenues were $8.7 million, or 58% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 versus $10.4 million, or 62% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. International revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were $6.4 million, or 42% of net revenue, as compared with $6.5 million, or 38% of net revenue, for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
      Gross Profit . Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2007 decreased by $627,000 to $8.1 million, or 54% of net revenue, as compared with gross profit of $8.8 million, or 52% of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The improvement in our gross margin as a percentage of net revenue was primarily the result of the increase in license fees and royalty income of $864,000 in the first quarter of 2007 when compared to the same quarter of 2006. Gross margin excluding the license fees and royalty revenue was 51% of products and services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to 52% for the same period of 2006.
      Other Income, Net . For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, other income included $16,000 related to the sale and leaseback of our former facility in San Clemente, California in March 2001.
      Operating Expenses . Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 decreased by $1.0 million, or 9%, to $10.0 million as compared to $11.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, but increased as a percentage of net revenue to 66% from 65% because of relatively lower net revenue from period to period.
      Sales and Marketing Expense . Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $313,000, or approximately 5%, to $6.4 million, or 42% of net revenue, as compared with $6.1 million, or 36% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Convention expenses increased by $520,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared with the same quarter of 2006, and selling and marketing expenses at our subsidiaries in Australia and New Zealand increased by $429,000. Operations at these subsidiaries commenced on March 1, 2006, and accordingly, our selling and marketing expenses for the first quarter of 2006 included only one month of expense for these subsidiaries. Offsetting the increases was a decrease in domestic payroll costs of approximately $696,000. We expect to continue investing in sales and marketing expenses and programs in order to grow our revenues, and therefore it is likely that these expenses in 2007 will reflect increases over the comparable periods in 2006.
      General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 decreased by $912,000, or 28%, to $2.4 million, or 16% of net revenue, as compared with $3.3 million, or 20% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from reduced payroll costs of $233,000, decreased legal, compliance and consulting fees of approximately $938,000 partially offset by increased audit fees of $290,000. We believe that our general and administrative expenses are likely to increase nominally in 2007 in comparison to comparable periods in 2006.
      Engineering and Development Expense. Engineering and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $12,000, or 1%, to $1.2 million, or 8% of net revenue, as compared with $1.2 million, or 7% of net revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2006. We expect to invest in additional development projects and personnel in 2007, and accordingly it is probable that our engineering and development expenses will increase in 2007.
      Patent Infringement Legal Settlement . In January 2005, we acquired the intellectual property portfolio of Diodem, consisting of certain U.S. and international patents of which four were asserted against us, and settled the existing litigation between us and Diodem, for consideration of $3.0 million in cash, 361,664 shares of our common stock, and a five-year warrant to purchase 81,037 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.06 per share. In connection with the Diodem patent litigation settlement, 45,208 shares of our common stock were issued to Diodem and placed in an escrow account. In the first quarter of 2006, we determined that it was probable the shares would be released from escrow, and accordingly, we recorded a $432,000 charge based on the fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2006.
Non-Operating Income (Loss)
      Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency Transactions . We realized a $53,000 gain on foreign currency transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to a $49,000 gain on foreign currency transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to the changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Euro, the Australian dollar and the New Zealand dollar. We have not engaged in hedging transactions to offset foreign currency fluctuations. Therefore, we are at risk for changes in the value of the dollar relative to the value of these foreign currencies.

20


Table of Contents

      Interest Income . Interest income resulted from interest earned on our cash and investments balances. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $152,000 as compared with $117,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
      Interest Expense . Interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2007 consisted primarily of interest on the financing of our business insurance premiums. In 2006, interest expense consisted primarily of interest on outstanding balances on our line of credit, standby fees under the line of credit, and the periodic use of the line of credit during the period. Interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $16,000 as compared to $149,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
      Income Taxes . An income tax provision of $69,000 was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with $82,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a $156,000 liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including related estimates of penalties and interest, which was accounted for as an increase in the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded an increase of $17,000 in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits including related estimates of penalties and interest. As of March 31, 2007, we have a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets, excluding foreign operations, in the amount of $26.6 million. Based upon our operating losses and the weight of the available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that we will not realize all of these deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     At March 31, 2007, we had approximately $16.1 million in net working capital, a decrease of $1.2 million from $17.3 million at December 31, 2006. Our principal sources of liquidity at March 31, 2007 consisted of our cash and cash equivalents balance of $12.8 million and a $10.0 million revolving bank line of credit with Comerica Bank (the “Lender”). Advances under the revolving bank line of credit may not exceed the lesser of $10.0 million or the Borrowing Base (80% of eligible accounts receivable and 35% of eligible inventory), less any amounts outstanding under letters of credit or foreign exchange contract reserves. Notwithstanding the foregoing, advances of up to $6.0 million may be made without regard to the Borrowing Base. The entire unpaid principal amount plus any accrued but unpaid interest and all other amounts due under the Loan Agreement are due and payable in full on September 28, 2008, but can be extended by us for an additional year upon Lender approval. Our obligations under the new line bear interest on the outstanding daily balance at our choice of either: (i) LIBOR plus 2.50%, or (ii) prime rate plus 0.25%. As security for the payment and performance of our obligations under the Loan Agreement, we granted the Lender a first priority security interest in certain collateral, which excludes intellectual property.
     The line of credit requires compliance with certain financial covenants, including: (i) minimum effective tangible net worth; (ii) maximum leverage ratio; (iii) minimum cash amount at the Lender of $6.0 million; and (iv) minimum liquidity ratio. The line also contains covenants that require the Lender’s prior written consent for us, among other things, to: (i) transfer any part of our business or property; (ii) make any changes in our location or name, or replace our CEO or CFO; (iii) consummate mergers or acquisitions; (iv) incur liens; or, (v) pay dividends or repurchase stock. The line contains customary events of default, any one of which will result in the right of the Lender to, among other things, accelerate all obligations under the line, set-off obligations under the line against any of our balances or deposits held by the Lender, or sell the collateral. We had no outstanding balance on our line of credit at March 31, 2007.
     For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our operating activities used cash of approximately $1.9 million, compared to cash usage of $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The most significant change in operating assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows was an accounts receivable decrease of $3.0 million (before the change in allowance for doubtful accounts), primarily the result of lower net revenue in the first quarter of 2007 versus the fourth quarter of 2006. Other significant changes in operating assets and liabilities were: an inventory increase of $1.1 million; a decrease of $2.2 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and, a decrease of $572,000 in deferred revenue.
     On January 10, 2006, we entered into a five-year facility lease with initial monthly installments of $39,000 and annual adjustments over the lease term. These amounts are included in the outstanding obligations as of March 31, 2007 listed below.

21


Table of Contents

     The following table presents our expected cash requirements for contractual obligations outstanding as of March 31, 2007 for the years ending as indicated below (in thousands):
                                         
    Less Than     1 to 3     3 to 5     More Than        
    1 Year     Years     Years     5 years     Total  
Operating leases
  $ 682     $ 1,137     $ 631     $     $ 2,450  
SurgiLight agreement
    25       50                   75  
Insurance premium financing
    539                         539  
 
                             
Total
  $ 1,246     $ 1,187     $ 631     $     $ 3,064  
 
                             
     Two executive officers have employment agreements that obligate us to pay them severance benefits under certain conditions, including termination without cause and resignation with good reason. In the event that both officers were terminated by us without cause or they resigned with good reason, the total severance benefits payable would be approximately $0.4 million based on compensation in effect as of March 31, 2007. In addition, our three executive officers and some members of management are entitled to certain severance benefits payable upon termination following a change in control, in which case the total severance benefits payable would be approximately $3.4 million based on compensation in effect as of March 31, 2007. We have agreements with two executive officers to pay bonuses for which $45,000 was paid in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and $95,000 was accrued at March 31, 2007. Also, we have agreements with certain other employees to pay bonuses based on targeted performance criteria.
     We believe we currently possess sufficient resources, including amounts available under our revolving bank line of credit, to meet the cash requirements of our operations for at least the next year. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, among other things, the effects of any acquisitions we may pursue as well as the rate at which our business grows, with corresponding demands for working capital and manufacturing capacity. We could be required or may elect to seek additional funding through public or private equity or debt financing. However, the improved or extended credit facility, or additional funds through public or private equity or other debt financing, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in this report for a discussion on recent accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     We generate a substantial portion of our net revenue from the sale of products outside the United States. Our sales from our international subsidiaries are denominated in their local currencies, and our sales in other international markets are denominated in U.S. dollars. As we do not engage in hedging transactions to offset foreign currency fluctuations, we are at risk for changes in the value of the dollar relative to the value of the foreign currency. An increase in the relative value of the dollar would lead to less income from sales denominated in foreign currencies unless we increase prices, which may not be possible due to competitive conditions in the respective foreign territories. Conversely, a decrease in the relative value of the dollar would lead to more income from sales denominated in foreign currencies. Additionally, we are obligated to pay expenses relating to international subsidiaries in their respective local currencies. Thus, we are also at risk for changes in the value of the dollar relative to the foreign currency with respect to our obligation to pay expenses relating to our international subsidiaries’ operations. An increase in the value of the dollar relative to the foreign currencies would reduce the expenses associated with the operations of our international subsidiaries’ facilities, whereas a decrease in the relative value of the dollar to the foreign currency value would increase the cost associated with the operations of our international subsidiaries’ facilities.
     We currently have a line of credit which bears interest at rates based on the Prime rate or LIBOR. At March 31, 2007, there were no balances outstanding on the line of credit. A change in the Prime rate or LIBOR would have an effect of an increase or decrease in interest expense on any balances outstanding.
     Our primary objective in managing our cash and cash equivalents balances has been preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity to meet our operating needs. Most of our excess cash and cash equivalents balances are invested in money market account auction rate securities in which there is minimal interest rate risk.

22


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
   Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2007. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2007.
   Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, we disclosed management’s assessment that our internal control over financial reporting contained no material weaknesses. No change in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the first quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
     In August 2004, we and certain of our officers were named as defendants in several putative shareholder class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaints purport to seek unspecified damages on behalf of an alleged class of persons who purchased our common stock between October 29, 2003 and July 16, 2004. The complaints allege that we and our officers violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose material information about the demand for our products and the fact that we would not achieve the alleged forecasted growth. The claimed misrepresentations include certain statements in our press releases and the registration statement we filed in connection with our public offering of common stock in March 2004. In January 2006, defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended consolidated class action complaint was granted and the action was dismissed, with leave to further amend, by the order of the Honorable David O. Carter, United States District Judge for the Central District of California. On March 10, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint. The third amended complaint makes the same allegations regarding violations of the federal securities laws but is limited to an alleged class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock pursuant to or traceable to the public offering of our common stock that closed in March 2004. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss that complaint and on July 25, 2006, the Court ruled on the motion, granting the motion on the grounds that lead plaintiffs lack standing, denying the motion on the grounds that the complaint fails to state a claim and allowing plaintiffs to file a fourth amended complaint and a motion to appoint new lead plaintiffs. On August 23, 2006, plaintiffs filed a fourth amended complaint which defendants answered on October 20, 2006. In addition, in August 2004, three stockholders filed derivative lawsuits in the Superior Court in Orange County, California seeking recovery on our behalf and alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty by two officers and by the members of our Board of Directors, who were named as defendants. The cases were consolidated and the plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action raised claims on our behalf that include alleged misrepresentations in 2003 and 2004 as to the demand for our products, our financial results and future prospects. In both the class action and the derivative suit the parties have entered into settlement agreements, subject to court approval.
     On April 20, 2007, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Derivative Stipulation”) in which they agreed to settle the derivative litigation. Under the Derivative Stipulation, in exchange for a release of all claims against the defendant officers and directors that were or could have been alleged in the complaints in the derivative cases and dismissal of the derivative suit, our directors and officers liability insurance carrier will pay on behalf of the individual defendants $500,000 to or as directed by us (including a $100,000 attorney’s fee to plaintiff) and we have agreed to adopt or maintain certain corporate governance measures described in the Derivative Stipulation. The Derivative Stipulation and a motion for approval of the settlement were filed in the Orange County Superior Court on April 24, 2007. On June 8, 2007 at 10 a.m., the Court, located at Department CX104 of the Orange County Superior Court, Complex Civil Center, 751 West Santa Ana Blvd., Santa Ana, California 92701, will hold a hearing on the motion for final approval of the settlement of the derivative action and also for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. If no stockholder objects and the Court approves the Derivative Stipulation, all stockholders will be barred from contesting the fairness or adequacy of the proposed settlement and from pursuing the settled derivative claims.

23


Table of Contents

     On April 23, 2007, the Court in the federal class action entered an Order preliminarily approving the settlement of the class action, as contained in a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Class Stipulation”) filed with the Court. A hearing on whether to approve the settlement is set for August 6, 2007. Under the Class Stipulation, in exchange for a release of all claims and dismissal of the litigation, our directors and officers liability insurance carrier will pay $1,950,000 in cash to fund payments to the class members, net of fees and costs to plaintiffs’ counsel. Such amount includes the amount the carrier will pay to settle the derivative action as discussed in the preceeding paragraph. As a result, there will be no cost to us. In the settlement agreements, the defendants admit no wrongdoing. Consummation of the settlements is, as noted, subject to court approval. As of March 31, 2007, no amounts have been recorded in the consolidated financial statements for these matters since management believes that it is not probable we have incurred a loss contingency.
     In January 2005, we acquired the intellectual property portfolio of Diodem, LLC, or Diodem, consisting of certain U.S. and international patents of which four were asserted against us, and settled the existing litigation between us and Diodem, for consideration of $3.0 million in cash, 361,664 shares of common stock (valued at the common stock fair market value on the closing date of the transaction for a total of approximately $3.5 million) and a five-year warrant exercisable into 81,037 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.06 per share. In addition, 45,208 additional shares of common stock were placed in escrow, to be released to Diodem, if certain criteria specified in the purchase agreement were satisfied in or before July 2006. As of March 31, 2006, we determined that it was probable that these shares of common stock would be released from escrow in or before July 2006. Accordingly, we recorded a patent infringement legal settlement charge of approximately $348,000 in 2006. In July 2006, we released these shares from escrow. The common stock issued, the escrow shares of common stock and the warrant shares have certain registration rights. The total consideration had an estimated value of approximately $7.4 million including the value of the patents acquired in January 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we accrued approximately $6.4 million for the settlement of the existing litigation with $3.0 million included in current liabilities and $3.4 million recorded as a long-term liability. In January 2005, we recorded an intangible asset of $0.5 million representing the estimated fair value of the intellectual property acquired. The estimated fair value of the patents was determined with the assistance of an independent evaluation expert using a relief from royalty and a discounted cash flow methodology. As a result of the acquisition, Diodem immediately withdrew its patent infringement claims against us and the case was formally dismissed on May 31, 2005. We did not pay and have no obligation to pay any royalties to Diodem on past or future sales of our products, but we agreed to pay additional consideration if any of the acquired patents held by us are licensed to a third party. In order to secure performance by us of these financial obligations, the parties entered into an intellectual property security agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the rights of existing creditors and the rights of any future creditors to the extent provided in the agreement, we granted Diodem a security interest in all of their rights, title and interest in the royalty patents.
     In February 2005, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Refocus Group, Inc. in order to obtain declaratory relief that certain of our planned activities in the field of presbyopia will not infringe the claims of a patent held by Refocus and/or that the Refocus claims are invalid. These claims were dismissed by the court in July 2005 without prejudice on the basis that we do not have a product that has been commercialized and, therefore, Refocus’ alleged infringement claims are not ripe. Once we have a commercial product in the field of presbyopia, we intend to renew our claim against Refocus. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in a lawsuit against Refocus. If we are not successful in such a lawsuit, we may not be able to market our presbyopia product or we may have to license certain patents from Refocus.
     From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings incidental to our business, but at this time we are not party to any other litigation that is material to our business.
Securities and Exchange Commission Inquiry
     Following the restatement of our financial statements in September 2003, we received, in late October 2003, and subsequently in 2003 and 2004, informal requests from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to voluntarily provide information relating to the restatement. We have provided information to the SEC and intend to continue to cooperate in responding to the inquiry. In accordance with its normal practice, the SEC has not advised us when its inquiry may be concluded, and we are unable to predict the outcome of this inquiry.

24


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Risk Factors
     The discussion or our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and describes the various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may be subject. The following is a summary description of any risk factors as to which there may have been a material change from, or which may be in addition to, those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. You should carefully review these risks, together with those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in evaluating our business.
Changes in our assumptions with respect to uncertain tax positions may have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.
      We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007, as required. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a $156,000 liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase in the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance. In 2007 and subsequent periods, the income tax assets and liabilities we recognize for uncertain tax positions, if any, will be adjusted when the related income tax liabilities are paid, the income tax positions are settled with the taxing authorities, the related statutes of limitations expire or under other circumstances as provided for in FIN 48. Our assessment of uncertain tax positions requires that we make estimates and judgments about the application of tax law, the expected resolution of uncertain tax positions and other matters. In the event that uncertain tax positions are resolved for amounts different than our estimates, or the related statutes of limitations expire without our being assessed additional income taxes, we will be required to adjust the amounts of the related assets and liabilities in the period in which such events occur. Such adjustments may have a material impact on our income tax provision and our consolidated results of operations. Moreover, if the FASB, SEC or others further amend or interpret the accounting standards relating to income taxes and uncertain tax positions, or challenge the estimates and judgments we make in applying such accounting standards, we could be required to adjust the amounts of our income tax assets and liabilities or to restate our consolidated financial statements. Any such adjustments or restatement could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated income tax provision, our consolidated results of operations and the price of our common stock.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
     None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
Modification of a Material Definitive Agreement.
     On May 9, 2007, we entered into Addendum 1 to License and Distribution Agreement with HSIC, which addendum is effective as of April 1, 2007 and modifies the License and Distribution Agreement entered into with HSIC on August 8, 2006, to add the terms and conditions under which HSIC has the exclusive right to distribute our new ezlase diode dental laser system in the United States and Canada. In the Addendum, separate minimum purchase requirements are established for the ezlase . If HSIC has not met the minimum purchase requirement for any 12-month period ending on March 31, we will have the option, upon 30 days written notice, to (i) convert ezlase distribution rights to a non-exclusive basis for a minimum period of one year, after which period we would have the option to withdraw ezlase distribution rights, and (ii) reduce the distributor discount on ezlase products.

25


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit No.   Description
10.1†
  Definitive License Agreement, dated January 24, 2007, by and between The Procter & Gamble Company and Biolase Technology, Inc.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Jeffrey W. Jones pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Richard L. Harrison pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Jeffrey W. Jones pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Richard L. Harrison pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  Confidential treatment was requested for certain confidential portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with Rule 24b-2, these confidential portions were omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

26


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May 10, 2007
         
  BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
 
 
  By:   /s/ JEFFREY W. JONES    
    Jeffrey W. Jones   
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
 
         
     
  By:   /s/ RICHARD L. HARRISON    
    Richard L. Harrison   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   

27


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
         
     
Exhibit No.   Description
10.1†
  Definitive License Agreement, dated January 24, 2007, by and between The Procter & Gamble Company and Biolase Technology, Inc.
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Jeffrey W. Jones pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Richard L. Harrison pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Jeffrey W. Jones pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Richard L. Harrison pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  Confidential treatment was requested for certain confidential portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with Rule 24b-2, these confidential portions were omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

28

Exhibit 10.1

LICENSE AGREEMENT

THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT (together with the attached Exhibits the "AGREEMENT") is effective as of the 24th day of January, 2007 (the "EFFECTIVE DATE"), between BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, Inc. (hereinafter along with its AFFILIATES, referred to as "BIOLASE"), located at 4 Cromwell, Irvine, California 92618 and The Procter & Gamble Company
(hereinafter along with its AFFILIATES, referred to as "P&G")
located at One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202. P&G and BIOLASE may each be referred to as a "PARTY" and collectively as the "PARTIES".

Whereas, P&G is engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing, selling and supporting a range of consumer products;

Whereas, BIOLASE is the owner or has certain rights in certain patents and technology as is more particularly set out in Exhibits A and B; and further, as is more particularly set out in Exhibit C (once Exhibit C is populated according to Section 6.2.1.1);

Whereas, P&G and BIOLASE entered into a Letter Agreement (the "LETTER") dated June 28th, 2006 setting forth the general terms and conditions for this AGREEMENT;

Whereas, P&G wishes to obtain, and BIOLASE is willing to grant to P&G, an exclusive license to the BIOLASE IP (as defined in Section 1.2) and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY (as defined in Section 1.5) according to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT;

Whereas, BIOLASE will retain certain rights to the BIOLASE PATENTS and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY according to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT;

Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and other mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the PARTIES hereto agree as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS

1.1. "AFFILIATE" means any corporation, limited liability company or other legal entity which directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with P&G or BIOLASE, including any successor or assign of such an entity. "CONTROL", with respect to an AFFILIATE, shall mean the direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of (i) the income, (ii) the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis or other voting rights of the subject entity to elect directors, or if not meeting the preceding, any entity owned or controlled by or owning or controlling at the maximum control or ownership right permitted in the country where such entity exists, or (iii) such other arrangement as constitutes the direct or indirect ability to direct the management, affairs or actions of such entity.

1

1.2. "BIOLASE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" (BIOLASE IP) means all present and future: inventions, whether or not patentable; BIOLASE PATENTS; copyrights; trade secrets; and any other rights or information or materials within the P&G FIELDS OF USE, whether confidential or not, owned by BIOLASE or in which BIOLASE has a transferable or LICENSABLE INTEREST.

1.3. "BIOLASE PATENTS" means those present and future patents and patent applications within the P&G FIELDS OF USE or within the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY or the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD to the extent permitted under Section 2.4 of this AGREEMENT, including but not limited to:
i) the patents listed in Exhibits A, B, and C, and any parent applications, continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, re-exams, reissues thereof, ii) any subsequent patents or patent applications having applicability in the P&G FIELDS OF USE in which BIOLASE has ownership or has a transferable or LICENSABLE INTEREST, and iii) any foreign equivalents of the foregoing

1.4. "BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD" means any and all fields of use and products which are (a) currently, meaning as of the EFFECTIVE DATE, marketed by BIOLASE; and (b) other fields of use and products intended to be used primarily in [* * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * ]. BIOLASE shall also retain all rights to the BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY that are outside the P&G FIELDS OF USE. BIOLASE shall also retain and acquire all rights to products that are declined by P&G or revert to BIOLASE as provided herein.

The BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD also includes any and all fields of use which are primarily administered by a [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ]

The BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD also includes products, methods, applications and services directly or indirectly using [* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ]: (i) [* * * * ]; (ii) [*
* * * * * ]; (iii) [* * * * * * * * * * * * * ]; (v)
[* * * ]; (vi) [* * ]; (vii) [* * * * ] and (viii) [* * ]. The BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD is applicable to products and methods [*
* * * * * ]. For the avoidance of doubt, products, methods, applications and services within the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE that relate to "(ii)", "(iii)", "(iv)", "(v)", "(vi)", and "(vii)" herein are

2

not part of the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD and are specifically included
in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE.

For the avoidance of doubt, the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD includes the Waterlase, the Waterlase MD, the DioLase Plus, the LaserSmile, the Oculase, all related consumables, accessories and related products, methods and all future generations and product line extensions of the aforementioned products.

The BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD specifically excludes the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, as defined below.

1.5. "BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY" means any present or future information or materials, whether confidential or not, in the possession of BIOLASE, including know-how, developments, concepts, technical knowledge, expertise, skill, practice, analytical methodology, clinical data, manufacturing knowledge, drawings, specifications, processes, techniques, samples, specimens, prototypes, designs, research and development results, safety and efficacy data, and other technical and scientific information reasonably useful or helpful to P&G for the development and marketing of product(s) within the P&G FIELDS OF USE.

1.6. "[* * * ] FIELD OF USE" shall mean only those [* * ] products that are in the form of a [* * ] and which, but for a license from BIOLASE, would infringe a valid and enforceable claim of the BIOLASE
[* * * ] Patents attached hereto as Exhibit B (such products hereinafter "[* * * ] PRODUCTS"). For the avoidance of doubt, [* * * ] Products shall not include any [* * ] devices or products that are not in the form of a [* * ], and specifically shall not include [* *
* * * * * * * * * * ].

1.7. "IMPROVEMENTS" shall mean any and all technology or intellectual property rights in and to any update, modification, customization, translation, upgrade, improvement, enhancement and/or derivative work whether or not developed under a JDA or SERVICES agreement between the PARTIES.

1.8. "LICENSABLE INTEREST" shall mean any licensable interest, whether or not royalty-bearing, that exists prior to the EFFECTIVE DATE, or that is licensed by BIOLASE from any third party after the EFFECTIVE DATE.

1.9.  [*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
       *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
       *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
       *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ].

3

1.10. "PRODUCT" shall mean any method, system, product, device or machine (or component thereof), accessory, consumable, composition, compound, ingredient, application, formulation, material, or combinations thereof in the P&G FIELDS OF USE, or within the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD to the extent permitted under Section 2.4 of this AGREEMENT, and which, but for the right and license granted herein, would infringe or cause the inducement of an infringement or contribute to or induce the infringement of one or more valid and enforceable claims of one or more BIOLASE PATENTS.

1.10.1. For the avoidance of doubt, any accessory, component, consumable, or [* * * ] composition that would contribute to or induce the infringement of one or more valid and enforceable claims of a BIOLASE PATENT shall be considered a PRODUCT hereunder. For example, if a valid and enforceable granted BIOLASE PATENT claim reads upon the [* * * * * * * * * ] (and no valid and enforceable claims cover [* * *
* * * ], [* * * * * * * ] are PRODUCTS hereunder to the extent [* * * * * * * * * * * ] induces or contributes to the infringement of the granted, valid and enforceable BIOLASE PATENT claim. For example, if a valid and enforceable granted BIOLASE PATENT claim reads upon the [* *
* * * * * * * * * * ] (and no valid and enforceable claims read upon the [* * * * * * * * * ]), [* * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ].

1.10.2. However, if the valid and enforceable granted BIOLASE PATENT claim reads upon the [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ]. Further, if [* * * * * * * * * *
* * * * ]. For example, if the valid and enforceable granted BIOLASE PATENT claim reads upon the [* * * * * *
* * * * ] and does not read upon a [* *], then the [* * ] is not a PRODUCT. Further, if the [* * * * * * * * * ] and the [* * * ], the [* * ] is still not a PRODUCT.

1.11. "P&G FIELDS OF USE" means, being applicable to [* * * ], any and all fields of use, including the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, and applications relating to or associated with [* * ] product [* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * ] including, but not limited to, those [* * ] product categories listed in attached Exhibit D. The P&G FIELDS OF USE excludes the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD. The P&G FIELDS OF USE also excludes the [* * * * ] FIELD OF USE, unless P&G exercises its option to add the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE.

1.12. "PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE" means [* * * ] products intended for
[* * * ] use, [* * * * * * * * * * ],

4

including any products which are distributed through [* * * * *] for use by a [* * * * * * * ]. Such [* * * ] products include, but are not limited to, any and all products that may provide one or more of the following benefits, either on a stand- alone basis or as a combination: [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * ], the whole PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE [* * * * * *]. The PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE specifically excludes the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD. The PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE also excludes the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE, unless P&G exercises its option to add the [* *
* ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE.

1.13."QUARTER" means any one of the following four (4) time periods within a calendar year: i) January, February, and March ("JFM"); ii) April, May, and June ("AMJ"); iii) July, August and September ("JAS"); and
iv) October, November, and December ("OND").

2. LICENSE GRANTS

2.1. LICENSE GRANT TO P&G. BIOLASE hereby grants to P&G an exclusive (even as to BIOLASE), worldwide, transferable, right and license under all BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY within the P&G FIELDS OF USE, with rights to sub-license, to make and have made, use, import, export, sell, have sold, and offer for sale PRODUCTS anywhere in the world.

2.2. OPTION TO [* * * * ] FIELD OF USE. P&G has the option to add the
[* * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE for [ * * * *] after the EFFECTIVE DATE of the AGREEMENT or for [* * * * ] after the effective date of the LETTER, whichever is sooner, by either:

i) the payment of a one time sum of [* * * ] ($[* *
* ]); or

ii) providing a written plan regarding [* * * * * ] of a
[* * * ] PRODUCT that is acceptable to BIOLASE, the acceptability of which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, together with a notice of P&G's agreement to pay BIOLASE a) a quarterly sum of [* * * *
* * * ] ($[* * * ]) (each payment a "[* * ] QUARTERLY PAYMENT"), and b) a royalty rate of [* * *
* * * * * * * ], on [* * * ] PRODUCTS in accordance with the royalty provision of this AGREEMENT. The first [* *

5

* ] QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due at the end of the QUARTER in which P&G receives written notice from BIOLASE accepting P&G's written plan for [* * * * *]. Each successive [* * * ] QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due on the last day of the subject QUARTER. The [* * * * * ] QUARTERLY PAYMENTS shall cease upon the [* *
* * ] distribution of a [* * * ] PRODUCT in one of the United States, Canada, or all or a portion of Eastern or Western Europe. [* * * * * ] of all the
[* * * * * ] QUARTERLY PAYMENTS shall be treated as prepaid royalties to be deducted from any subsequent ROYALTY - PAYMENTS owed under this AGREEMENT.

2.2.1.A written plan shall be considered reasonably acceptable, but reasonable acceptability is not limited to, if the written plan can be implemented within a commercially reasonable period time, and it includes the planned commercial launch of a product in at least one of the United States, Canada, or all or a portion of Western or Eastern Europe.

2.2.2.In the event that P&G exercises its option to add the [* *
* ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, then the
[* * * * * ] FIELD OF USE shall be treated as if originally included within the exclusive rights and obligations from BIOLASE to P&G under this AGREEMENT.

2.2.3.If P&G does not exercise its option to add the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE to the P&G FIELDS OF USE within the time period specified, the option will expire, and the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE will be part of the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD.

2.3. REVERSION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS TO BIOLASE WITHIN P&G FIELDS OF USE (EXCLUDING THE PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE). Unless otherwise agreed to between the PARTIES, if, [* * ] has lapsed from the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT or [* * * * ] has lapsed from the effective date of the LETTER, whichever is sooner, and P&G has not:

(i) initiated development of; or

(ii) provided a plan to BIOLASE to develop (either itself or via a licensee or via some other relationship with a third party)

products utilizing BIOLASE IP or BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY in one or more of the P&G consumer product categories included within the P&G FIELDS OF USE (excluding the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE), then BIOLASE may terminate P&G's exclusive license to BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY in those particular P&G consumer product categories as follows: BIOLASE may provide P&G with written notice of its intent to terminate such exclusive license and if P&G fails to provide BIOLASE with a plan to initiate development within [* * * ]of such notice from BIOLASE, P&G's exclusive license in the identified P&G consumer product category(ies) (excluding the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE) will be terminated and removed from P&G's FIELDS OF USE.

6

2.3.1.In the event P&G satisfies the requirements of "(i)" or "(ii)" of this Reversion of Certain Rights Section, P&G will retain its exclusive rights to said BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY within said P&G consumer product category for a period [* * * ] beginning upon the satisfaction by P&G of 2.3(i) or 2.3(ii). However, if after said [* * * ] time period, P&G has not implemented a [* * * * * ] distribution of a PRODUCT in said P&G consumer product category, but is actively developing or attempting to commercialize within said P&G product category, then P&G, in its sole discretion, may (a) pay BIOLASE a QUARTERLY sum of [* * * * ] ($[* * * ]) (each payment a "SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENT") or (b) allow the BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY to revert to BIOLASE, and owe nothing further to BIOLASE for the BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY with respect to such PRODUCT in said P&G consumer product category. If P&G elects to pay BIOLASE SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENTS, the first SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due at the end of the QUARTER in which P&G receives written notice from BIOLASE accepting P&G's written plan for
[* * * * * ]. Each successive SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due on the last day of the subject QUARTER. The SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENTS shall cease upon the [* * * *] distribution of a PRODUCT in said product category in one of the United States, Canada, or all or a portion of Eastern or Western Europe. [* * * * *] of all the SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENTS shall be treated as pre-paid royalties that shall be treated as prepaid royalties [* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * ]. P&G may terminate the SECONDARY QUARTERLY PAYMENTS at any time for any reason, in which event exclusive rights under the BIOLASE IP and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY relating to said P&G consumer product category shall revert to BIOLASE.

2.3.2.For the sake of clarity, P&G's exclusive rights in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE of use are not subject to reversion to BIOLASE.

2.3.3.A written plan shall be considered reasonably acceptable to both PARTIES, but reasonable acceptability is not limited to, if the written plan is commercially reasonable and can be implemented within a commercially reasonable time period, and it includes the planned commercial launch of a product in at least one of the United States, Canada, or all or a portion of Western or Eastern Europe.

2.4. POTENTIAL LICENSES TO P&G WITHIN BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD.

2.4.1.For the time period encompassing [* * * ] from the Effective Date of this AGREEMENT or [* * * ] from the effective date of the LETTER, whichever time period ends sooner, BIOLASE will offer P&G the right of first refusal to develop [* * ] products within the following BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD categories: (i) [* * * * * * ] (ii) [* * * * * * *
* ]; (iii) [* * * * * * * * * ]; (iv) [* * * * ];
(v) [* * * ]; (vi) [* * * ]; (vii) [* * * * * ]; and
(viii) [* * * * ].

7

2.5. DECISION MAKING. Within (i) the P&G FIELDS OF USE (including the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE if P&G exercises its option to add the [* * * * * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE), (ii) P&G consumer product categories in the P&G FIELDS OF USE that have not reverted back to BIOLASE, and (iii) BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD categories offered to, and accepted by P&G under Section 2.4.1, P&G shall have the full and unrestricted right, but not the obligation, to make any and all decisions, in its sole discretion, surrounding its use of any BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and/or BIOLASE IP, including, without limitation, the development, testing, marketing, manufacture, sourcing, packaging, sale, distribution, marketing and pricing of any products whatsoever in the P&G FIELDS OF USE, as well as whether or not to launch, market, promote, distribute and sell, or continue to sell, any Product whatsoever. In addition, P&G shall remain free to work with, contract with, subcontract with, conduct research and development with, or work for any third party and other third party researchers, developers, manufacturers, suppliers, etc. regarding any products or PRODUCTS, subject to all confidentiality obligations owed to BIOLASE.

2.6. CONVERSION TO NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE. Excluding the [* * * * ] FIELD OF USE, P&G may, in its sole discretion, convert, at any time after [* * * ] from the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT, its exclusive license(s) under this AGREEMENT to non-exclusive license(s), in which case P&G will no longer be obligated to pay the FIRST or SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENTS, or QUARTERLY PAYMENTS; however, P&G will not be entitled to a refund of any payments previously paid.

2.6.1.In the event the exclusive license is converted to a non-exclusive license, the royalty rates shall remain as agreed to herein (at [* * * ]). However, if BIOLASE enters into a nonexclusive license with a third party at more favorable terms than that granted to P&G, BIOLASE shall offer the same terms to P&G, which P&G may accept at its sole discretion. For example, if BIOLASE grants a third party rights at a lower royalty rate than that applicable to P&G, P&G shall be offered the opportunity to convert its royalty rate to the lower royalty rate granted to such third party, with such lower rate to take effect upon execution of such third party agreement.

3. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

3.1. LICENSED BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY AND BIOLASE IP RELATED TO THE PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE. Upon reasonable written (including electronically) request by P&G, BIOLASE shall share or transfer to P&G, relevant aspects of the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and BIOLASE IP licensed to P&G in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, including, the patent applications for the BIOLASE PATENTS in Exhibits A (and Exhibit B in the event P&G exercises its option to add the [* * * ] FIELD OF

8

USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE) and related patent prosecution information, including conception and reduction to practice information, and will reasonably make available to P&G for consultation those BIOLASE employees with substantive knowledge regarding the application of BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and BIOLASE IP in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE; provided, however, that BIOLASE will not be required to provide more than [* * * * ] of such consultation time per quarter to P&G and no more than [* * * * *
* * ] in [* * ] consecutive calendar quarters. P&G and BIOLASE will appoint technical and patent liaisons who will serve as designated points of contact to develop and coordinate a timely process that is not overly burdensome for BIOLASE to effectuate said sharing of BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and BIOLASE IP in the event P&G provides BIOLASE with a reasonable written request hereunder.

In the event that such consultation leads P&G to determine that direct involvement of BIOLASE employees and R&D resources will be beneficial to the development of products using the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, P&G and BIOLASE may also enter into a joint development agreement ("JDA"), or other agreement, pursuant to which BIOLASE shall provide P&G with the specified testing, research, development, prototyping, production, manufacturing services or other assistance requested by P&G, to test, develop, produce and manufacture prototype PRODUCTS and such other products using the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY as P&G may request ("SERVICES").

As applicable, the PARTIES will meet at least annually to review progress on specific development projects within the P&G FIELDS OF USE.

3.2. LICENSED BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY AND BIOLASE IP IN P&G FIELDS OF USE (EXCLUDING THE PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE). Upon reasonable written request from P&G, BIOLASE will share the information reasonably necessary for P&G to determine whether P&G has an interest in developing and commercializing a BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY or BIOLASE IP within the P&G FIELDS OF USE (excluding the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE). Should P&G have an interest in evaluating or commercializing BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY or BIOLASE IP disclosed under this Section 3.2, BIOLASE shall disclose information to P&G which is reasonably related to P&G's interest (including development and manufacturing information), within a commercially reasonable period of time of P&G's request to BIOLASE.

4. PAYMENTS

4.1. QUARTERLY PAYMENTS TO BIOLASE UNTIL SHIPMENT OF A FIRST PRODUCT. P&G
shall pay BIOLASE a QUARTERLY sum of [* * * * * * * ] ($[* *
* ]) (each payment a "QUARTERLY PAYMENT"). The first QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due at [* * * * * ] in which the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT occurs or [* * * * * * ] from the effective date of the LETTER, whichever is sooner. Each successive QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be due on the [* * * * * * * * ] (See Section 4.4.1). QUARTERLY PAYMENTS shall cease upon [*

9

* * ] distribution in the United States of the first Product. [* *
* ] of each QUARTERLY PAYMENT is payment for services provided by BIOLASE to P&G. [* * * * * ] of each Quarterly Payment shall be treated as pre-paid royalties [* * * * * * * * * * * *
* ]). Payments made under this Section 4.1 are non-refundable except as otherwise provided herein.

4.2. MILESTONE PAYMENTS FOR FIRST PRODUCT AND SECOND PRODUCT

4.2.1. FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT. P&G shall pay BIOLASE a product launch milestone payment in the amount of [* * * *] ($[* * * ]) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth here below (the "FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT").

4.2.1.1. The FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT shall be due when the first PRODUCT covered by one or more valid and enforceable claims of one or more United States BIOLASE PATENT(S) is first shipped for [* * * * ] distribution in the United States.

4.2.1.2. Payments made under this Section 4.2.1 are non-refundable except as otherwise provided herein. For the sake of clarity, BIOLASE shall be entitled to only one FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT and under no circumstance shall there be another FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT.

4.2.2. SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT. P&G shall pay BIOLASE a second product launch milestone payment in the amount of [* *
* * * ] ($[* * * ]) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth here below (the "SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT").

4.2.2.1. The SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT shall be due when the second PRODUCT covered by one or more valid and enforceable claims of one or more United States BIOLASE PATENT(S) is first shipped for [* * * * * ] distribution in the United States.

4.2.2.2. The SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT shall be treated as prepaid royalties [* * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * ]. The second PRODUCT shall not include cosmetic changes or minor improvements (refreshes) which do not fundamentally change the benefit delivered by the first PRODUCT. The second PRODUCT is one that is largely unique and different from the first PRODUCT. For the avoidance of doubt, some non-limiting examples of a PRODUCT that does not differ significantly from the first PRODUCT are PRODUCTS that incorporate only packaging changes; artwork changes; bonus packs; marketing promotions; changes to the size, color or shape of the PRODUCT; the addition or elimination of minor [* * * ], and combinations thereof. Payments made under this Section 4.2.2 are non-refundable except as otherwise provided herein. For the sake of clarity, BIOLASE shall be entitled to only one SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT

10

PAYMENT and under no circumstance shall there be another Second PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT. For the sake of clarity and to serve as an example, if a first PRODUCT is a [*
* ], the second Product may or may not be a [* * * ]. Further, if a first PRODUCT is a [* * ] and a second PRODUCT is a [* * * ], the [* * ] will be a second PRODUCT.

4.2.3. For the sake of clarity, in no circumstance will there be a third product shipment payment.

4.3. ROYALTY PAYMENTS ON PRODUCT SALES

4.3.1. P&G will make royalty payments (the "ROYALTY PAYMENTS") to BIOLASE based on the NOS of such PRODUCTS. The ROYALTY PAYMENT shall be equal to the [* * * * * * * * ]. ROYALTY PAYMENTS may be reduced by [* * * * * * * * * * * * ].

4.3.2. The royalty rate shall be [* ] if the PRODUCT is in a [* * *] product category where [* * * * * * * * * * * ] (see Exhibit D for a non-exhaustive list). For the avoidance of doubt, a [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ] shall be considered a product category where [* * * *
* * * * * * ] and shall be only subject to a [* ] royalty in the event a royalty is applicable. The royalty rate shall be [* ] if the PRODUCT is in a product category where [* * * * * * * * * * * ]. [* * * * * * * * * * ] which [* * * * ] shall not trigger a [* * ] royalty. Further, using [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ] shall not trigger a [* * ] royalty. For the avoidance of doubt, [* * * * * * * *
* ], but only [* * * ], then a [* * * * ] or [* * ] that
[* * ] would be considered a product in a category where [*
* * * * * * * * * * *].

4.3.3. The amount of ROYALTY PAYMENTS due shall be calculated on [*
* * ] basis from the date of [* * * * ] of PRODUCT in such
[* * ]. ROYALTY PAYMENTS shall only be due for sales in those
[* * ] where commercial sale of a PRODUCT (as defined in
Section 1.10) is covered by one or more [* * * * * * * ] claims covering said PRODUCT. ROYALTY PAYMENTS shall be paid on a QUARTERLY basis and shall be due on the [* * ] of the subject QUARTER. P&G may elect to combine ROYALTY PAYMENTS into a single payment mechanism (e.g., a single wire transfer).

4.3.4. P&G Sublicenses to Third Parties

11

4.3.4.1. P&G Sublicenses Comprising Only BIOLASE PATENTS. To the extent that P&G would have owed ROYALTY PAYMENTS for a PRODUCT under this AGREEMENT, sub-licenses (comprising only BIOLASE PATENTS) from P&G to third parties will bear [* * ] royalty rate
[ * * * * * ]. [ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *].

4.3.4.2. P&G Sublicenses Comprising BIOLASE PATENTS and P&G Intellectual Property. In the event P&G enters any agreement with a third party that includes P&G intellectual property and a grant under BIOLASE PATENTS as part of that agreement, wherein said grant to such third party to sell products under BIOLASE PATENTS and said sale would have been subject to ROYALTY PAYMENTS by P&G to BIOLASE if P&G were selling such products, P&G and BIOLASE shall mutually agree to [* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ], and P&G shall pay
[ * * * ] to BIOLASE. For example, if P&G elected to license a third party rights under both BIOLASE PATENTS and P&G intellectual property, and [* * * * *] obligated the third party to pay P&G an [* *] to maintain such license then BIOLASE would receive [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *].

4.3.4.2.1. The [* * *] under this Section 4.3.4.2 shall be [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * *]. It is foreseeable that BIOLASE, only as applicable to this Section 4.3.4.2 may receive [* *] compensation, according to the [* * * * * * * * *
* * * * *], for BIOLASE PATENTS than they otherwise would have under this Agreement. In no event, however, shall the [* * *] owed to BIOLASE exceed the equivalent of a [* * ] ROYALTY PAYMENT, as would otherwise be applicable under this Agreement.

4.3.5. P&G shall deliver to BIOLASE a written report of all NOS of PRODUCTS, [* * ] in all countries where royalty payments are due on Products sold, the applicable royalty rate, the amount of earned royalty, and the calculation of the ROYALTY PAYMENT due to Biolase after deduction of the current total amount of payments hereunder that [* * * * ]. Said royalty report shall be delivered by P&G within [* * * * *] of the last day of the Quarter in which they are earned.

4.3.6. P&G shall keep accurate and complete records for Products marketed pursuant to this AGREEMENT of: (i) its calculation of NOS for Products (as defined herein); and (ii) all royalties paid and payable hereunder (hereinafter such

12

reports shall collectively be referred to as "SALES AND ROYALTY RECORDS"). Such Sales and Royalty Records will be kept with sufficient detail to enable an independent auditor to verify such figures and to calculate NOS and total royalties paid and payable hereunder and shall be retained for the TERM and for at least
[* * * ] subsequent to expiration of the TERM or termination.

4.3.7. All payments due to BIOLASE under this Article shall be made in U.S. Dollars via wire transfer to an account designated by BIOLASE. P&G shall notify BIOLASE as indicated below prior to sending any such wire transfers.

4.3.8. Any SALES AND ROYALTY REPORT(S) and notification of any wire transfer(s) shall be delivered to: BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, Inc., 4 Cromwell, Irvine CA 92618, attention Richard Harrison, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, or to his designee or successor.

4.3.9. At any time prior to the expiration of [* * *] following the end of any calendar year, BIOLASE shall have the right to audit P&G's SALES AND ROYALTY RECORDS RELATIVE to this AGREEMENT, said auditor being independent, having no past relationship with BIOLASE. The purpose of such audit shall be to verify the calculation of gross sales for such year, NOS for such year and the royalties paid and payable hereunder for such year. BIOLASE shall provide at least [* * * * *] advance written notice before each such audit. P&G shall cooperate in such audit by allowing BIOLASE access (during P&G's normal business hours at the locations where such SALES AND ROYALTY RECORDS are kept) solely to P&G's SALES AND ROYALTY RECORDS. Upon request by P&G, the BIOLASE auditor may be required, as a condition of being granted access to P&G's SALES AND ROYALTY RECORDS hereunder, to agree to maintain any information reviewed (including, but not limited to the Auditor's Reports (defined in Section 4.3.11) submitted to the PARTIES pursuant to 4.3.11 below) in confidence. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, BIOLASE may only cause an audit once in any calendar year and only once with respect to each calendar year.

4.3.10.At the conclusion of the auditor's audit pursuant to Section 4.3.9 above, the auditor shall submit a written report (herein "AUDITOR'S REPORT") to the PARTIES setting forth the auditor's findings with respect to the correct gross sales, NOS and total royalties paid and payable for the quarter(s) in question. If the AUDITOR'S REPORT results in findings as to gross sales, NOS or royalties which are different from those originally reported or paid by P&G, then the AUDITOR'S REPORT shall include a reconciliation of the original figures with those found to be correct by the auditor and the source of such difference(s). The Auditor's Report and its content shall be treated as confidential pursuant to Section 11. If there is no challenge to the AUDITOR'S REPORT within [* * *] after receipt of the report by P&G, and it shows an underpayment of royalties, then P&G shall pay to BIOLASE within [* * ] of expiration of the [* * ] challenge period an amount sufficient to remedy the amount of any under reporting

13

or underpayment of royalties found by the auditor plus interest calculated at the then current prime rate from the date such payment is due. If the AUDITOR'S REPORT shows an overpayment of royalties, such overpayment shall be creditable against any future royalties payable in subsequent royalty periods. The cost and expense of any audit conducted hereunder shall be borne by BIOLASE unless the AUDITOR'S REPORT finds an error in BIOLASE's favor of at least [* * * ] of the royalties originally paid by P&G, in which case P&G shall bear such cost and expense, subject to the outcome of the audit dispute resolution process specified in following section.

4.3.11.The PARTIES agree to work together with the auditor in good faith to resolve any disputes arising out of or relating to the numbers verified and the results reported in an AUDITOR'S REPORT in a timely, professional and non-adversarial manner. If the PARTIES and the auditor cannot so resolve a dispute, then either Party may submit such dispute for binding arbitration (hereinafter referred to as "ROYALTY ARBITRATION") to a panel of three (3) arbitrators. Such Royalty Arbitration shall be conducted in Cincinnati, Ohio, if brought by BIOLASE and in Irvine, California if brought by P&G. The arbitrators shall be selected and the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association except that the only issue for arbitration in the ROYALTY ARBITRATION shall be the accuracy of the reporting and calculation of the values for gross sales, NOS, and royalties paid and payable hereunder. The arbitrators shall not have power to add to, subtract from or modify any of the terms or conditions of this AGREEMENT. Any award rendered in such arbitration may be enforced by either PARTY in the courts of the State of New York, to whose jurisdiction each PARTY hereby irrevocably consents and submits for such purpose. Each PARTY shall bear its own expense associated with the ROYALTY ARBITRATION. The losing party shall bear the cost of the arbitration itself and will also be required to pay the other party's attorneys' fees associated with the ROYALTY ARBITRATION. In the event that the outcome of the arbitration is such that there is not a clear losing party, then the PARTIES agree to share the costs for the arbitration in a manner consistent with the decision of the arbitrators.

4.3.12.WITHHOLDING. If a law or regulation of any country in which PRODUCTS are sold requires withholding of taxes of any type, levies or other charges with respect to any amounts payable hereunder to BIOLASE, P&G shall promptly pay such tax, levy or charge for and on behalf of BIOLASE to the proper governmental authority, and shall promptly furnish BIOLASE with receipt of such payment. P&G shall have the right to deduct any such tax, levy or charge actually paid from payment due BIOLASE or be promptly reimbursed by BIOLASE if no further payments are due BIOLASE. P&G agrees to assist BIOLASE in claiming exemption from such deductions or withholdings under double taxation or similar agreement or treaty from time to time in force and shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the amount required to be so withheld or deducted.

14

4.4. PAYMENT DUE DATES. Except for the payment of first QUARTERLY PAYMENT due [* * ] the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT (the "INITIAL QUARTERLY PAYMENT"), any payment, including but not limited to any QUARTERLY PAYMENT, ROYALTY PAYMENTS, FIRST PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT, SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT, etc., due under this AGREEMENT shall be paid within [* *] days of its due date. In the event the payor does not make the payment in full by the [* * * ] day after the due date, the payee shall be entitled to interest in the amount of the then current [* * * * * *] on any unpaid amount, from the [* *] following the due date until such time as the payor pays the payee the amount owed.

4.4.1. The INITIAL QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be paid within [* * * ] after the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT. For the avoidance of doubt, if the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT is January 24, 2007, then the INITIAL QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be paid on or before [* * * ] and the next QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be paid on or before [* * * * ], and still further, the third QUARTERLY PAYMENT shall be paid on or before [* * * ]. In the event the payor does not make the INITIAL QUARTERLY PAYMENT in full by the
[* * * ] after execution of this AGREEMENT, the payee shall be entitled to interest in the amount of the then current prime rate plus [* * *] on any unpaid amount, from the [* * * *] following the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT until such time as the payor pays the payee the amount owed.

4.4.2. Any QUARTERLY PAYMENT that accrues after the beginning of a QUARTER shall be pro-rated to deduct a portion of the QUARTERLY PAYMENT associated with the period of time between the beginning of the QUARTER and the accrual date of the payment within the QUARTER.

5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

5.1. BACKGROUND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. All IP developed, conceived or reduced to practice prior to the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT shall continue to be owned by the respective PARTY that developed, conceived or reduced it to practice.

5.2. OWNERSHIP BY P&G. All Improvements made solely by P&G shall be owned and retained by P&G, including IMPROVEMENTS to BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY invented or developed solely by P&G. Further, IMPROVEMENTS made solely by P&G, including patent applications comprising only such IMPROVEMENTS, are not subject to this AGREEMENT.

5.3. OWNERSHIP BY BIOLASE. BIOLASE shall continue to own BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and BIOLASE IP and, except as set forth herein, no other rights or licenses to the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY or BIOLASE IP shall be granted to P&G, and BIOLASE shall own any IMPROVEMENTS to the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY that it solely develops, conceives or reduces to practice, provided, however, that such IMPROVEMENTS shall be licensed to P&G in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT.

15

5.3.1. While P&G has the right to file on BIOLASE IMPROVEMENTS (e.g., continuations-in-part under Exhibit A) under Section 6.1 below, it is understood that BIOLASE shall retain ownership of said BIOLASE IMPROVEMENTS and said BIOLASE PATENTS.

5.4. JOINT OWNERSHIP. The PARTIES shall jointly own any IP that is jointly conceived under this AGREEMENT. Any jointly owned IP shall be licensed to P&G by BIOLASE in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT.

5.4.1. Pursuant to Section 3.1 above, the PARTIES may agree to enter into a JDA or SERVICES agreement. Terms and conditions for a JDA or SERVICES agreement shall be agreed to at the time P&G and BIOLASE mutually agree to enter into such an arrangement.

6. PREPARATION AND PROSECUTION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS AND PATENT COSTS

6.1 LICENSED BIOLASE PATENTS OF EXHIBITS A AND B. Upon the Effective Date of this AGREEMENT and written notification from P&G, P&G will have the right, but not the obligation, to take control of the BIOLASE PATENTS listed in Exhibit A (and Exhibit B, if P&G exercises its option to add the [* * *] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE) and patent applications comprising BIOLASE IMPROVEMENTS in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE and P&G/BIOLASE joint IMPROVEMENTS to the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE. P&G's right to take control as discussed above in this Section 6.1 shall mean to have sole responsibility and decision making authority for the preparation, filing (including the filing of continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, reissues, and reexaminations), prosecution, and maintenance of the BIOLASE PATENTS listed in Exhibit A (and Exhibit B, if P&G exercises its option to add the [* * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE). P&G will pay all costs and expenses associated with said control in the event and to the extent P&G exercises its right to take control of one or more BIOLASE PATENTS hereunder. BIOLASE will cooperate with P&G, including giving P&G power of attorney and changing the correspondence address to P&G's address.

6.1.1 In the event that P&G takes control of a BIOLASE PATENT and decides not to prosecute or maintain said BIOLASE PATENT in any particular country (including the United States), BIOLASE may take back control of that patent or application in which event BIOLASE shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated with the said BIOLASE PATENT, including costs and expenses associated with the prosecution and maintenance of said patent.

6.1.1.1 In the event P&G elects not to prosecute or maintain a BIOLASE PATENT that P&G has taken control of, P&G will provide BIOLASE with at least [* *

16

*] advance written notice of such decision. P&G's written notice will be done in a good faith manner which reasonably provides BIOLASE with at least [*
* *] to continue with prosecution or maintenance of that BIOLASE PATENT. In the event that BIOLASE takes control of a BIOLASE PATENT under Sections 6.1.1 or 6.1.2, such change in control will have no effect on P&G's payment obligations under
Section 4 and said BIOLASE PATENT shall continue to be licensed to P&G pursuant to the license grant of Section 2.

6.1.1.2 P&G will only be responsible for the costs and

          expenses incurred from the time of control of a BIOLASE
          PATENT is taken by P&G to the sooner of (a) [*  *  *
          *] or (b) the lapse of [*  *  *] from the time of
          notice to BIOLASE that P&G will not continue to
          prosecute or maintain particular BIOLASE PATENT(S).

6.1.2 [*   *   *   *   *  *   *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
     *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *   *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
     *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *   *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

* * * * * * * * *].BIOLASE will have control and be responsible for all costs associated with any filings made by BIOLASE under this Section 6.1.2. Any filings made by BIOLASE under this Section 6.1.2 shall be subject to the license granted to P&G under Section 2 of this AGREEMENT.

6.1.3 For the applications or patents which P&G controls or has taken control of under this AGREEMENT, P&G shall notify BIOLASE of all written and oral communications to and from any patent office(s) (including, filings, official actions, responses to official actions, etc.) in the same manner outlined by Section 6.2.2.1 and BIOLASE shall have the right to provide P&G with comments on matters relevant to all fields outside of the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE and P&G shall consider in good faith said BIOLASE comment(s) in the same manner outlined by 6.2.2.

6.1.4 INTERFERENCES, OPPOSITIONS, AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS. For BIOLASE PATENTS controlled by P&G, P&G also may, in its

17

sole discretion, elect to undertake or defend any interference, reexamination, opposition or similar procedure with respect to said BIOLASE PATENTS. P&G shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated with said proceedings. If P&G does not elect to undertake or defend any interference, reexamination, opposition or similar procedure, BIOLASE may elect to do so at BIOLASE's expense.

6.2 LICENSED BIOLASE PATENTS RELATED TO THE P&G FIELD OF USE.

6.2.1 BIOLASE shall provide to P&G a written update, at least [*
* *], starting from the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT, of the BIOLASE PATENTS in Exhibits A, Exhibit B (if P&G exercises its option to add the [* * * *] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE), and Exhibit C (if any consumer product categories in the P&G FIELDS OF USE remain after [* * ] from the EFFECTIVE of this AGREEMENT or if P&G accepts any BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD CATEGORIES offered by BIOLASE)

6.2.1.1 Exhibit C is to be populated by BIOLASE [* * * ] from the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT so long as at least one consumer product category in the P&G FIELDS OF USE remains after [* * *] from the EFFECTIVE of this AGREEMENT, or so long as P&G accepts at least one
(1) BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD category offered by BIOLASE. Exhibit C shall remain unpopulated upon execution of this AGREEMENT.

6.2.2 For all BIOLASE PATENTS in Exhibits A, B, or C under the control of BIOLASE, P&G shall have the ability to provide BIOLASE with comments relevant to the P&G FIELD OF USE and these comments will be considered in good faith by BIOLASE. P&G comments may include, but are not limited to, claim and specification amendments, submission of prior art, claim additions and deletions, and arguments responsive to official communications from a patent office related thereto.

6.2.2.1 For BIOLASE PATENTS in Exhibits A, B, or C under the control of BIOLASE, copies of official written communications from a patent office shall be provided to P&G as soon as reasonably possible, but in no event greater than [* * * *] after receipt by BIOLASE. Additionally, all papers prepared by BIOLASE for filing in a patent office shall be provided

18

to P&G within a reasonable period of time to allow for P&G comment and incorporation thereof by BIOLASE, as applicable. Each PARTY shall be responsible for its own attorney's fees and other costs incurred in reviewing filings and official communications, and making, reviewing, discussing, and incorporating comments. Copies of official written communications to a PATENT office shall be provided to P&G as soon as reasonably possible, but in no event greater than
[* * *] after submission by BIOLASE

6.2.2.2 In the event that BIOLASE decides not to prosecute or maintain a BIOLASE PATENT in Exhibits A or B (for those BIOLASE PATENTS in Exhibits A or B which BIOLASE maintains or takes control of) or Exhibit C in any particular country (including the United States), P&G may take control of that particular application or PATENT and elect to pay all costs and expenses associated with control, including prosecution and maintenance of the BIOLASE PATENTS. BIOLASE shall provide P&G with at least [* * * ] advanced written notice of such decision not to prosecute or maintain a BIOLASE PATENT in Exhibit A. B, or C as applicable. BIOLASE's written notice will be done in a good faith manner which provides P&G with at least [* * * ] to continue with prosecution or maintenance of that BIOLASE PATENT. P&G may discontinue its prosecution or maintenance of a BIOLASE PATENT under this Section 6.2.2.2 at any time acting in its sole discretion.

6.2.3 INTERFERENCES, OPPOSITIONS, AND SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS. For BIOLASE PATENTS of Exhibit A that remain controlled by BIOLASE, BIOLASE shall notify P&G of all written and oral communications to and from any patent office(s) concerning any reexamination, reissuance, interference, opposition or similar proceedings in the same manner outlined by Section 6.2.2.1 and P&G shall have the right to comment on matters relevant to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE and BIOLASE shall consider in good faith said P&G comment(s) in the same manner outlined by Section 6.2.2.

19

6.3 COOPERATION. P&G and BIOLASE agree to fully cooperate regarding the execution of any documents necessary or desirable to prepare, prosecute, or maintain any patents under Section 6.

7. INFRINGEMENT BY THIRD PARTIES

7.1 NOTIFICATION. Both BIOLASE and P&G agree to notify each other in writing should either PARTY become aware of a possible infringement of the BIOLASE PATENTS that relates to the P&G FIELDS OF USE.

7.2. THIRD PARTY INFRINGEMENT IN P&G FIELDS OF USE (EXCLUDING THE P&G PRIMARY FIELD OF USE).

7.2.1. If P&G provides BIOLASE with evidence of infringement of one of the BIOLASE PATENTS listed in or to be listed in Exhibit C in the P&G FIELDS OF USE other than the P&G PRIMARY FIELD OF USE, and if P&G has initiated development or provided a plan as described above in Section 2.3, then P&G may by written notice request BIOLASE to take steps to terminate the infringement. If BIOLASE does not, within [* * ] of receipt of such notice, take appropriate action against the alleged infringement, then:

7.2.1.1 Upon written notice to BIOLASE, P&G shall have the right, but not the obligation, as exclusive licensee to institute such action in its own name as it deems appropriate to terminate said infringement through negotiation, litigation, and/or alternative dispute resolution at P&G's expense. As exclusive licensee, P&G shall have the power at its expense to institute, prosecute and settle, including by granting the infringing party a sublicense, suits for infringement of the BIOLASE PATENTS listed in or to be listed in Exhibit C under this Section 7.2.1.1 after said [* * * ] period, and if required by law, BIOLASE will join as a party plaintiff in such suits at P&G's expense.

7.2.1.2. P&G shall have the right to select and control counsel in any action initiated by P&G under Section 7.2.1.1.

7.2.2. Any recovery awarded or received in connection with any negotiation, settlement or suit under this Section 7.2. in excess of litigation costs shall belong solely to P&G except as provided under
Section 4.3.4.

20

7.3. THIRD PARTY INFRINGEMENT IN PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE.

7.3.1 As exclusive licensee in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, P&G shall have sole decision making authority regarding enforcement of the BIOLASE PATENTS listed or belonging in Exhibit A (and Exhibit B, if P&G exercises its option to add the [* * * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE). P&G shall have the right, but not the obligation, to file, prosecute and settle any such claims at its sole discretion. P&G shall retain any proceeds paid by a third party as a result of the enforcement of the BIOLASE PATENTS within the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE except as provided under Section 4.3.4. BIOLASE agrees to cooperate with P&G with the enforcement of any claim within the PRIMARY P&G FIELDS OF USE and agrees to join, at P&G's expense, any such action as a party plaintiff to the extent required by law.

7.3.1.1 P&G agrees that it will use reasonable efforts to consult with BIOLASE prior to the initiation of any action by P&G under
Section 7.3.1. For the avoidance of doubt, said consultation under this Section 7.3.1.1 shall not impair P&G's right to, in its sole discretion, institute an action in its own name under
Section 7.3.1 to terminate an infringement in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE.

7.3.1.2. P&G shall have the right to control and to select counsel in any action initiated by P&G under Section 7.3.1.

7.3.1.3 Any recovery awarded or received in connection with any negotiation, settlement, or suit under this Section 7.3.1 in excess of litigation costs shall belong solely to P&G except as provided under Section 4.3.4.

7.4. THIRD PARTY INFRINGEMENT IN BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD. BIOLASE will have sole control and discretion regarding how to proceed in the event that a third party is infringing one of the BIOLASE PATENTS in the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD and any recovery or settlement awarded or received in connection with such action shall be solely retained by BIOLASE.

7.5. PROSECUTION OF THIRD PARTY INFRINGEMENT IN OTHER PARTY'S FIELD OF USE.

7.5.1. To the extent that P&G is permitted to exploit a specific Product application in the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD pursuant to
Section 2.4 and a third party is infringing one of the BIOLASE PATENTS in connection with such Product application, such infringement shall be treated as if it had taken place in P&G FIELDS OF USE (excluding the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE) in accordance with Section 7.2.

7.6. DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS.

7.6.1. If a declaratory judgment action alleging invalidity, unenforceability or non-infringement of any of the BIOLASE PATENTS

21

is brought against P&G or if a declaratory judgment action alleging invalidity, unenforceability or non-infringement of any of the BIOLASE PATENTS is brought against BIOLASE for a BIOLASE PATENT under which P&G is paying BIOLASE a royalty, P&G may elect, in its sole discretion, to have sole control of the action, including, but not limited to, selection and control of counsel and the defense and settlement of the action, and if P&G so elects it shall bear all the costs of the action and shall defend against such declaratory judgment action. P&G shall keep BIOLASE reasonably informed of the progress of the legal action. P&G may not agree to invalidity, unenforceability, or non-infringement of a BIOLASE PATENT or any claim thereof without BIOLASE'S prior written consent, which may be not be unreasonably withheld.

7.6.2. Except as set forth in Section 7.6.1, if a declaratory judgment action alleging invalidity, unenforceability or non-infringement of any of the BIOLASE PATENTS is brought against BIOLASE, BIOLASE shall have sole control of the action, including, but not limited to, selection and control of counsel and the defense and settlement of the action.

7.6.3. Except as set forth in Section 7.6.1, if a declaratory judgment action alleging invalidity, unenforceability or non-infringement of any of the BIOLASE PATENTS is brought against both PARTIES, BIOLASE shall have sole control of the action, including, but not limited to, selection and control of counsel and the defense and settlement of the action.

7.7. COOPERATION. Each Party shall fully cooperate with the other PARTY, at said other PARTY'S expense, in support of any action initiated by said other PARTY under Section 7, including using commercially reasonable efforts to have its employees testify when requested and to make available relevant records, papers, information, samples, specimens, and the like.

8. ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF THE PARTIES

8.1. ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT BY P&G IN P&G FIELDS OF USE OR FOR A SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 2.4.

8.1.1. If P&G, any of its AFFILIATES or sublicensees, distributors or other customers are approached by or sued by a third party concerning an allegation of patent infringement for the development, manufacture, use, distribution or sale of a product within the P&G FIELDS OF USE, including the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, for a product incorporating BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, or for a specific product application under Section 2.4, P&G will promptly, within reason, notify BIOLASE upon its receiving written notice of such allegation. P&G shall be entitled to solely control all aspects of the defense or mitigation of any such allegations, including but not limited to, selection and control of counsel, negotiation, litigation strategy development and execution, and settlement.

22

8.1.2. In the event P&G is a party to a legal action pursuant to
Section 8.1.1, BIOLASE shall fully cooperate with and supply all assistance reasonably requested by P&G, including by using commercially reasonable efforts to have its employees testify when requested and to make available relevant records, papers, information, samples, specimens, and the like. P&G shall bear the reasonable expenses incurred by BIOLASE in providing assistance and cooperation as requested by P&G pursuant to this Section 8.1.2.

8.1.3. P&G shall keep BIOLASE reasonably informed of the progress of the legal action, and BIOLASE shall be entitled to be represented by counsel in connection with such legal action at its own expense.

8.1.4. P&G shall have the sole right to settle any claims under this
Section 8.1.

8.1.5. In the event P&G settles any claim under Section 8.1.4., P&G agrees that it will not take any action that would (i) compromise any of BIOLASE's assets, including but not limited to the BIOLASE PATENTS, BIOLASE IP, BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY and (ii) obligate BIOLASE to a third party in any way. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Section 8.1.5 shall be interpreted to reduce, diminish, or extinguish any rights granted to P&G under this AGREEMENT.

9. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

9.1. OF BOTH PARTIES. Each PARTY represents and warrants to the other PARTY that, as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT:

9.1.1. The execution, delivery and performance of this AGREEMENT and the consummation by the warranting PARTY of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the warranting PARTY, as appropriate.

9.1.2. This AGREEMENT has been duly executed and delivered by the warranting PARTY, and constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the warranting PARTY enforceable against such PARTY in accordance with its terms, subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors' rights and remedies generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to the general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).

23

9.1.3. The warranting PARTY has not and will not enter into any agreement, the terms and conditions of which, would be inconsistent or in derogation with any of the terms and conditions hereof.

9.1.4. The warranting PARTY is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization, and has full power, authority and legal right to execute, deliver and perform this AGREEMENT, and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this AGREEMENT.

9.1.5. The warranting PARTY is not subject to any judgment, order, injunction, decree or award of any court, administrative agency or governmental body that would or might interfere with its performance of any of its material obligations hereunder.

9.2.OF BIOLASE. BIOLASE hereby covenants, represents, and warrants to P&G, that to BIOLASE's knowledge:

9.2.1    There are no claims, liens, mortgages, licenses, commitments,
         obligations, or encumbrances of any kind concerning the
         BIOLASE IP that would affect the ability of BIOLASE to grant
         the rights and perform the obligations contemplated by this
         AGREEMENT.

9.2.2.   Any granted, or allowed claims, of the BIOLASE PATENTS are
         valid and enforceable and there are no actions or prior art
         that would affect the validity or enforceability of any
         granted, or allowed claims, of the BIOLASE PATENTS, including,
         but not limited to, any reexamination requests, opposition
         proceedings, certificates of correction, or reissuance
         requests. BIOLASE's knowledge applies to all agents and
         employees of BIOLASE, as well as, agents and attorneys
         preparing and prosecuting BIOLASE PATENTS (not including P&G
         agents and P&G attorneys).

9.2.3.   BIOLASE owns all right, title, and interest in the BIOLASE IP.

9.2.4.   BIOLASE has made a reasonable effort to populate Exhibits A,
         B, and C (once Exhibit C is populated [*   *   * ] after the
         EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT), such that attached Exhibits
         A, B, and C (once Exhibit C is populated [*   * ] after the
         EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT) of this AGREEMENT contain a
         true and complete list of all of the BIOLASE PATENTS,
         including BIOLASE PATENTS that BIOLASE has a LICENSABLE
         INTEREST or transferable interest in. It is understood that,
         despite a reasonable effort to populate Exhibits A, B, and C
         (once Exhibit C is populated [*   * ] after the EFFECTIVE DATE
         of this AGREEMENT), Exhibits A, B, or C may not be a true and
         complete list of all BIOLASE PATENTS. However, upon
         realization of any error, correction will be made within a
         reasonable period.

                                                                     24

9.2.5.   BIOLASE PATENTS and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY related thereto, listed
         in attached Exhibits A, B, and C (once Exhibit C is populated
         [*  *   *] after the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT) are not
         subject to any contractual obligations in the P&G FIELDS OF
         USE, including existing or expectant licenses.

9.2.6.   As of the EFFECTIVE DATE, BIOLASE does not, directly or
         indirectly, make, presently have made, use, import, export,
         sell, presently have sold, or offer for sale, anywhere in the

world, a [*** **] or a [* * *], or a [* * * * * * * *
* * *].

9.3. BIOLASE hereby covenants, represents, and warrants to P&G, throughout the term of this AGREEMENT, BIOLASE will, as far as it is reasonably practicable to do so, cause its employees who are employed to do research, development, or other inventive work, to disclose to it inventions within the scope of this AGREEMENT and to assign to BIOLASE rights in such inventions such that P&G shall receive, by virtue of this AGREEMENT, the license(s) agreed to be granted to it, it being understood that if due care and diligence are used, any inadvertent failure to comply with this Section 9.3 shall not constitute a breach of this AGREEMENT.

9.4. EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE CONSTRUED AS:

9.4.1 A WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION BY EITHER PARTY AS TO THE VALIDITY, ENFORCEABILITY, OR SCOPE OF ANY PATENT;

9.4.2. A WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION THAT ANY MANUFACTURE, SALE, OFFER FOR SALE, LEASE, IMPORT, USE OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF ANY PRODUCTS HEREUNDER WILL BE FREE FROM INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES;

9.4.3. A WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION BY EITHER PARTY WITH RESPECT TO THEIR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY PATENT INCLUDING THE PROSECUTION, DEFENSE OR CONDUCT OF ANY ACTION OR SUIT CONCERNING INFRINGEMENT OF ANY SUCH PATENT.

25

9.5. NO OTHER REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. Neither Party makes any representations or warranties other than as expressly set forth in this Section 9.

10. TERM AND TERMINATION

10.1. TERM. Unless otherwise terminated as provided herein, the AGREEMENT shall be effective up to and including the date of expiration of the last to expire BIOLASE PATENT in Exhibits A, B and C.

10.2. TERMINATION

10.2.1. TERMINATION FOR AN UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH. Failure by either PARTY to comply with any of the material obligations contained in this AGREEMENT (the "BREACHING PARTY") shall entitle the other PARTY (the "NON-BREACHING PARTY") to give to the BREACHING PARTY notice, pursuant to Section 12.1, specifying the nature of the breach and requiring it to cure such breach. In the event the PARTIES are unable to resolve the matter, the PARTIES may enter an arbitration, pursuant to Section 12.2. In the event that the BREACHING PARTY is found, pursuant to
Section 12.2, to have committed a MATERIAL BREACH and said MATERIAL BREACH BECOMES AN UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH, the NON-BREACHING PARTY may terminate this AGREEMENT.

10.2.3. TERMINATION BY MUTUAL CONSENT. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by mutual written consent of the PARTIES and rights hereunder divided as the PARTIES agree in writing.

10.2.4. TERMINATION IN EVENT OF CHANGE IN CONTROL OF BIOLASE. Pursuant to Section 10.4 below, P&G may terminate this AGREEMENT in the event of a CHANGE IN CONTROL of
BIOLASE.

10.3. CERTAIN EFFECTS OF TERMINATION.

10.3.1. TERMINATION BY BIOLASE FOR P&G UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH. Effective upon a termination by BIOLASE in accordance with Section 10.2.1 above, the following shall occur:

10.3.1.1. Except for Section 10.3.1.3, P&G's licenses under the BIOLASE PATENTS and BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY shall automatically be deemed to have terminated and all rights thereunder shall automatically be deemed to have reverted to BIOLASE;

10.3.1.2. P&G shall destroy all copies of BIOLASE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION provided by BIOLASE to P&G hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and provided

26

P&G fulfills its obligations specified in this AGREEMENT with respect to such materials, P&G's counsel may continue to retain solely for archival purposes a single copy of BIOLASE's CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and any other materials provided by BIOLASE.

10.3.1.3. P&G shall retain a non-exclusive, worldwide license to import, offer for sale, or sell any remaining PRODUCTS that had been manufactured up to the date of termination of this AGREEMENT. This non-exclusive license shall automatically terminate upon [* * * * * * *
* * * * * * ] or [* * * * *] of the termination of this AGREEMENT, whichever is sooner. P&G shall owe BIOLASE a royalty under
Section 4.3 for the sales of said PRODUCTS under this Section 10.3.1.3.

10.3.2. TERMINATION BY P&G FOR UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH BY BIOLASE. If P&G terminates this AGREEMENT for a MATERIAL BREACH in accordance with Section 10.2.1 above, BIOLASE, at P&G's request, shall refund all prior payments received by BIOLASE from P&G, insofar as they specifically pertain to the UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH for the term including the [* * ] preceding and up to the time of the UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH. Said refund shall include, but is not limited to FIRST or SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT(S), QUARTERLY PAYMENTS, ROYALTY PAYMENTS, and the PAYMENT made under the LETTER. If P&G elects to receive a refund of prior payments and the PARTIES are unable to agree on the amount to be refunded with respect to a UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH, either PARTY shall submit such dispute to be settled by arbitration in accordance with Section 12. However, if BIOLASE commits an UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH, P&G may alternatively elect to retain its exclusive license(s) without the obligation to pay FIRST or SECOND PRODUCT SHIPMENT PAYMENT(S), QUARTERLY PAYMENTS, ROYALTY PAYMENTS, or any other monies whatsoever, however, if P&G retains its exclusive license(s), it will not be entitled to a refund of monies previously paid.

10.4. CHANGE IN CONTROL OF BIOLASE . BIOLASE shall promptly notify P&G of any CHANGE IN CONTROL as the term is defined in 10.4.2, of BIOLASE or a BIOLASE AFFILIATE that is primarily responsible for undertaking the obligations under this AGREEMENT. If the CHANGE IN CONTROL event involves a direct competitor to P&G in the P&G PRIMARY FIELD OF USE, P&G will no longer have any obligation to share or to disclose information to BIOLASE regarding the development of products; P&G's ability to convert to a non-exclusive license pursuant to 2.6 shall no longer be subject to any time limitation on

27

when such conversion can occur and BIOLASE shall also take all actions necessary to prevent disclosure of P&G CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to the party involved in the CHANGE IN CONTROL event, excepting information provided to BIOLASE pursuant to
Section 4.3. Further upon a CHANGE IN CONTROL event involving a direct competitor to P&G in the P&G PRIMARY FIELD OF USE, P&G may elect to terminate, modify or continue under this AGREEMENT as defined in this Section 10.4.

10.4.1. If the CHANGE IN CONTROL event involves a direct competitor to P&G in the P&G PRIMARY FIELD OF USE, P&G may elect, without consequence, as provided below:

(i) P&G may elect to terminate any research, development or manufacturing activity that BIOLASE may have been conducting for P&G under this AGREEMENT or a separate agreement relating to this AGREEMENT.

(ii) P&G may elect to continue under this AGREEMENT, including any research, development or manufacturing activity that BIOLASE may have been conducting for P&G under this AGREEMENT or a separate agreement related to this AGREEMENT, in which case P&G may request in writing that BIOLASE or the parent of the entity acquiring control of BIOLASE agree to commit in writing, within [* *
* ] after receipt of such request, to continue to perform the specified BIOLASE activity, to otherwise agree to be bound by the provisions of this AGREEMENT, and to agree to commit in writing to duly and timely pay, perform and discharge all of the obligations of BIOLASE under this AGREEMENT.

(iii) P&G may elect to terminate this AGREEMENT and a determination pursuant to Exhibit E will be made of the PURCHASE PRICE of the BIOLASE PATENTS licensed to P&G in the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE under this AGREEMENT, which patents are listed on Exhibit A (and on Exhibit B if P&G has exercised its option to add the [* * * * ] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE), and within [*** * * ] following such PURCHASE

28

Price determination P&G will make the further election, in writing, either to
(a) purchase BIOLASE PATENTS, or (b) rescind its election to purchase BIOLASE PATENTS. If P&G shall elect to purchase the BIOLASE PATENTS, the AGREEMENT shall terminate except for certain surviving obligations. P&G shall be obligated to grant back limited rights to BIOLASE under the acquired BIOLASE PATENTS if such patents cover products outside the P&G FIELD OF USE.

10.4.2  CHANGE IN CONTROL. For purposes of this AGREEMENT, a
        "CHANGE IN CONTROL" of BIOLASE shall be deemed to have
        occurred in the event of (i) a merger, combination,
        reorganization or consolidation of BIOLASE with or into
        another corporation with respect to which less than a
        majority of the outstanding voting power of the
        surviving or consolidated corporation is held by
        shareholders of BIOLASE immediately prior to such event,
        (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of the
        properties and assets of BIOLASE and its subsidiaries,
        or (iii) the accumulation or acquisition by any
        individual, firm, corporation, or entity (other than any
        profit sharing or other employee benefit plan of BIOLASE
        or any Affiliate, or any employee or group of employees
        or former officers an/or directors of BIOLASE or its
        Affiliates) of beneficial ownership, directly or
        indirectly, of securities of BIOLASE representing more
        than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of
        BIOLASE's then outstanding voting securities.

10.5 RIGHT OF FIRST NEGOTIATION. If BIOLASE elects to seek a buyer for any BIOLASE PATENT set out in Exhibit A (and Exhibit B in the event P&G exercises its option to add the [** * *] FIELD OF USE to the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE) licensed hereunder to P&G, P&G shall have a [* *] right of first negotiation with respect to a potential purchase by P&G of such BIOLASE PATENT. In the event the PARTIES do not enter into a binding agreement with respect to such purchase within the [* *] period or in the event BIOLASE receives a binding unsolicited offer, BIOLASE will have sole discretion to pursue offers and sale to other parties. It is understood that BIOLASE may license, or may have licensed, other parties in fields outside of fields licensed to P&G under this AGREEMENT, and that BIOLASE PATENTS may be so encumbered when first offered to P&G under this Section 10.5.

10.6 TERMINATION NOT SOLE REMEDY. Termination is not the sole remedy under this AGREEMENT and, whether or not termination is affected, all other remedies will remain available except as agreed to otherwise herein.

29

10.7. SURVIVAL OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS. Section 11 shall survive any termination, in whole or in part, of this AGREEMENT. The termination of this AGREEMENT will not relieve either PARTY of any liability it may have to the other PARTY arising out of or relating to acts or omissions occurring prior to termination.

11. CONFIDENTIALITY

11.1. During the term of this AGREEMENT, both PARTIES may be exposed to certain information of the other Party, not generally known to the public and related to this AGREEMENT, which has been identified by the DISCLOSING PARTY (the "DISCLOSING PARTY") at the time of disclosure as being confidential by means of an appropriate marking, or, if disclosed orally or visually, shall be confirmed in writing as confidential within [* * * ] of the oral or visual disclosure (collectively the "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION"). The PARTY receiving the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION (the "RECEIVING PARTY") shall keep the DISCLOSING PARTY's CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in confidence for a period of [* * *] from disclosure, using measures no less protective than the RECEIVING PARTY takes to protect its own CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION of like nature, which in no event will be less than a reasonable standard of care. The RECEIVING PARTY shall not use, copy or disclose the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any third party, nor permit any of its personnel to use, copy or disclose the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION for any purpose not specifically contemplated by this AGREEMENT. For the avoidance of doubt, it is understood by the PARTIES that disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by P&G to suppliers, contract manufacturers, testing organizations or consumer testing, or consultants for the purposes of market testing, product development or manufacture within the P&G FIELDS OF USE or for a specific product application under Section 2.4 constitute purposes specifically contemplated by this AGREEMENT.

11.1.1. EXCEPTIONS. The obligations in Section 11.1 shall not preclude the RECEIVING PARTY from using or disclosing the same or similar information which may be the same as the DISCLOSING PARTY's CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to the extent that such same or similar information (i) was or later becomes, through no act or omission on the part of the RECEIVING PARTY, generally available to or available to the public; (ii) was rightfully in the possession of the RECEIVING PARTY at the time of disclosure by the DISCLOSING PARTY, as established by relevant documentary evidence, without restriction as to use or disclosure; (iii) is hereafter acquired by the RECEIVING PARTY from a third party who, in providing such information, does not

30

breach an obligation or confidence of the other PARTY and provides such information without restriction as to use or disclosure; or (vi) is independently conceived, created, or developed by the RECEIVING PARTY without use of or access to the other PARTY's CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, as established by relevant documentary evidence. The provisions of Section 11 will not restrict a PARTY from disclosing the other PARTY's CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to the extent required by any law or regulation; provided that the PARTY required to make such a disclosure uses reasonable efforts to give the other PARTY reasonable advance notice of such required disclosure in order to enable the other PARTY to prevent or limit such disclosure.

12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

12.1. NOTICE AND NEGOTIATION. In the event of any dispute or disagreement arising out of this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES shall attempt to resolve the matter by submitting it for resolution to the President or Chief Executive Officer of BIOLASE and the appropriate Vice President or General Manager of Research and Development of P&G. If these representatives are unable to resolve such dispute to the satisfaction of both BIOLASE and P&G within [* * * ] after the date on which the dispute was submitted to such representative(s), the dispute shall be subject to the process described in Section 12.2 below.

12.2. ARBITRATION. P&G and BIOLASE will attempt to settle any claim, controversy or deadlock through consultation and negotiation in good faith and a spirit of mutual cooperation pursuant to
Section 12.1 above. If such attempt fails, the PARTIES agree to submit to binding arbitration that will be governed by the rules and procedures of the American Arbitration Association, with the requirement that the decision being issued by a written decision and opinion signed by an independent three-person panel. Such arbitration shall take place in the State of New York. Judgment upon the award of the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. In the event the arbitration involves a claimed material breach of the AGREEMENT, the alleged breach shall become a MATERIAL BREACH upon a decision by the arbitration panel that a MATERIAL BREACH has occurred. A breaching PARTY shall have [*
* *] to cure a MATERIAL BREACH as outlined in the written decision and opinion of the three-person panel of this Section
12.2. If the MATERIAL BREACH is not cured within [* * *], it shall become an UNCURED MATERIAL BREACH. If the binding arbitration involves a patent issue, at least a majority of the arbiters, in addition to other certifications and/or qualifications, will be licensed patent attorneys.

12.2.1. Any payment required under the terms of Sections 12.2 shall be made in USD to the bank designated by the PARTY to be paid hereunder.

31

13. INDEMNIFICATION

13.1. BY P&G. From and after the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT, P&G will indemnify, defend and hold harmless BIOLASE and its AFFILIATES and their respective directors, officers, shareholders, partners, attorneys, accountants, and employees and any agents of the foregoing and any heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (the "BIOLASE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") from, against and in respect of any damages, losses, charges, obligations, liabilities, actions, interest, penalties and reasonable costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' and experts' fees and expenses incurred to enforce successfully the terms of this AGREEMENT, "BIOLASE LOSSES AND EXPENSES")) imposed on, sustained, incurred or suffered by any of the BIOLASE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES relating to, arising from or otherwise in respect of (i) any breach of, or inaccuracy in, a representation or warranty of P&G hereunder, or (ii) a breach of a covenant or other agreement of P&G hereunder, or (iii) any action brought by a third party against a BIOLASE INDEMNIFIED PARTY arising from or related to P&G's manufacturing, sale, marketing, distribution, or other exploitation of a product covered by the BIOLASE PATENTS and/or the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY; provided, however, that P&G shall have no obligation to indemnify BIOLASE for any BIOLASE LOSSES AND EXPENSES for which indemnification is sought if (i) such BIOLASE LOSSES AND EXPENSES were also caused by, relate to or involve a breach of, or inaccuracy in, any covenant, obligation, representation or warranty of BIOLASE provided to P&G in this AGREEMENT or (ii) such BIOLASE LOSSES AND EXPENSES result from or arise out of a material action or omission of BIOLASE.

13.2. BY BIOLASE. From and after the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT, BIOLASE will indemnify, defend and hold harmless P&G and its AFFILIATES and licensees and their respective directors, officers, shareholders, partners, attorneys, accountants, and employees and any agents of the foregoing and any heirs, executors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (the "P&G INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") from, against and in respect of any damages, losses, charges, obligations, liabilities, actions, interest, penalties and reasonable costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' and experts' fees and expenses incurred to enforce successfully the terms of this AGREEMENT, "P&G LOSSES AND EXPENSES")) imposed on, sustained, incurred or suffered by any of the P&G INDEMNIFIED PARTIES relating to, arising from or otherwise in respect of (i) any breach of, or inaccuracy in, a representation or warranty of BIOLASE hereunder, or (ii) a breach of a covenant or other agreement of BIOLASE hereunder, or (iii) any action brought by a third party against a P&G INDEMNIFIED PARTY arising from or

32

related to BIOLASE's manufacturing, sale, marketing, distribution, or other exploitation of a product covered by the BIOLASE PATENTS and/or the BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY; provided, however, that BIOLASE shall have no obligation to indemnify P&G for any P&G LOSSES AND EXPENSES for which indemnification is sought if (i) such P&G LOSSES AND EXPENSES were also caused by, relate to or involve a breach of, or inaccuracy in, any covenant, obligation, representation or warranty of P&G provided to BIOLASE in this AGREEMENT or (ii) such P&G LOSSES AND EXPENSES result from or arise out of a material action or omission of P&G.

13.3. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. The "Indemnified PARTIES" shall mean the BIOLASE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES and the P&G INDEMNIFIED PARTIES. If a claim by a third party is made against an INDEMNIFIED PARTY hereunder, and if such INDEMNIFIED PARTY intends to seek indemnity with respect thereto under this Section 13, such INDEMNIFIED PARTY will promptly notify BIOLASE, in the case of a P&G INDEMNIFIED PARTY, or P&G, in the case of a BIOLASE INDEMNIFIED PARTY (such PARTY to be notified, the "INDEMNIFYING PARTY") in writing of such claims setting forth such claims in reasonable detail, provided that failure of such INDEMNIFIED PARTY to give prompt notice as provided herein will not relieve the INDEMNIFYING PARTY of any of its obligations hereunder, except to the extent that the INDEMNIFYING PARTY is materially prejudiced by such failure. The INDEMNIFYING PARTY will have [* * * ] after receipt of such notice to undertake, through counsel of its own choosing, subject to the reasonable approval of such INDEMNIFIED PARTY, and at the INDEMNIFYING PARTY'S expense, the settlement or defense thereof, and the INDEMNIFIED PARTY will cooperate with it in connection therewith; provided, however, that the INDEMNIFIED PARTY may participate in such settlement or defense through counsel chosen by such INDEMNIFIED PARTY, provided that the fees and expenses of such counsel will be borne by such INDEMNIFIED PARTY. If the INDEMNIFYING PARTY will assume the defense of a claim, it will not settle such claim without the prior written consent of the INDEMNIFIED PARTY, (a) unless such settlement includes as an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant of a release of the INDEMNIFIED PARTY from all liability with respect to such claim or (b) if such settlement involves the imposition of equitable remedies or the imposition of any material obligations on such INDEMNIFIED PARTY other than financial obligations for which such INDEMNIFIED PARTY will be indemnified hereunder. If the INDEMNIFYING PARTY will assume the defense of a claim, the fees of any separate counsel retained by the INDEMNIFIED PARTY will be borne by such INDEMNIFIED PARTY unless there exists a conflict between them as to their respective legal defenses (other than one that is of a monetary nature), in which case the INDEMNIFIED PARTY will be entitled to retain separate counsel, the reasonable fees and expenses of which will be reimbursed by the INDEMNIFYING PARTY. If the

33

INDEMNIFYING PARTY does not notify the INDEMNIFIED PARTY within [* * *] after the receipt of the INDEMNIFIED PARTY's notice of a claim of indemnity hereunder that it elects to undertake the defense thereof, the INDEMNIFIED PARTY will have the right to contest, settle or compromise the claim but will not thereby waive any right to indemnity therefore pursuant to this AGREEMENT. The indemnification provisions set forth in this Section 13 are the sole and exclusive means of recovery of money damages with respect to the matters covered herein, except for fraud.

13.4. LIMITATION ON LOSSES AND EXPENSES. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no INDEMNIFYING PARTY hereunder shall be liable (including liability for negligence or other tortious act or omission) for (a) any loss of profit, loss of contract or loss of goodwill incurred by any INDEMNIFIED PARTY; or (b) any punitive, indirect or consequential damages incurred by any INDEMNIFIED PARTY pursuant to this AGREEMENT (it being understood that any damages described in this Section 13.4 owed by any INDEMNIFIED PARTY to any third party will be considered direct damages, not subject to this Section 13.4).

14. MISCELLANEOUS

14.1. CERTAIN INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Due to the important confidentiality concerns of the PARTIES, and for other reasons, the PARTIES will be irreparably damaged in the event that the provisions of Section 11 are not specifically enforced. In the event of a breach or threatened breach of the terms, covenants and/or conditions of either such Section 11 by any of the PARTIES hereto, the other party shall, in addition to any other remedies it may have, be entitled to a temporary or permanent injunction, without showing any actual damage, and/or a decree for specific performance, in accordance with the provisions of such Section 11.

14.2. NONCOMPETE. Subject to Section 14.2.1 of this Non-Compete
Section 14.2, BIOLASE by itself or through third PARTIES shall not directly or indirectly enter into the research, development, prototyping, testing, manufacture, supply, marketing, distribution, sale, promotion, or commercialization of any compounds, materials, or products in the P&G FIELDS OF USE, including the PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE, and the [* * *] Field (if P&G exercises its option) by: (i) developing, prototyping, conducting research on, manufacturing, supplying, marketing, selling or distributing any such products or products competing with such products to any third party other than P&G; (ii) licensing any intellectual property to any third party other than P&G for use in connection with the research, development, prototyping, testing, manufacture, supply, marketing, distribution, sale, promotion, or commercialization any such compounds, materials, or products;
(iii) consulting with, supplying compounds, materials, or products to, cooperating with or providing services to, any third party other than P&G with respect to the research, development, prototyping, testing, manufacture, supply, marketing,

34

distribution, sale, promotion, or commercialization of any such compounds, materials, or products; or (iv) investing in any third party other than P&G, that engages in the research, development, prototyping, testing, manufacture, supply, marketing, distribution, sale, promotion, or commercialization of such products, (collectively, the "Restricted Business"); provided, however, that this restriction shall not apply to BIOLASE directly acquiring a non-controlling ownership interest of less than fifty percent (50%) of the equity of a public or private company that engages in a RESTRICTED BUSINESS if BIOLASE acquires such equity stake in such company primarily in exchange for obtaining rights (either via an outright assignment or a license) or access to technology owned by such company and that is unrelated to the Restricted Business and such company's market cap does not exceed [* * *
* * *] ($[* * *]). In addition, BIOLASE may acquire a less than [*] equity stake in any publicly traded or private company that derives less than [* *] of its revenues from the Restricted Business.

14.2.1. The time periods of this Non-Compete Section shall apply to and be effective for/during the time period that P&G has license rights, or options thereto (excluding the categories which revert back to BIOLASE). The terms of Sections 14.2 and 14.2.1 shall not apply to
(i) categories which have reverted back to BIOLASE from the P&G FIELDS OF USE, (ii) the
[* * *] Field in the event that P&G does not exercise its option, and (iii) the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD.

14.3. ASSIGNMENT. This AGREEMENT and the rights and obligations thereunder, may not be assigned, whether by operation of law or otherwise, or otherwise transferred by either PARTY to a third party, except as authorized in writing by the other PARTY or as expressly set forth in Section 10 with respect to a BIOLASE CHANGE IN CONTROL, except that either PARTY may assign the rights and obligations under the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part, to an AFFILIATE existing as of the EFFECTIVE DATE, or P&G may assign its rights and obligations under this AGREEMENT to a third party in the event P&G divests, transfers, or sells to that third party a portion or its entire business associated with one or more PRODUCTS. Any attempted assignment or delegation except as permitted herein shall be null and void. Any assignee of this AGREEMENT under this Section 14.3 shall covenant to the PARTIES in writing that such assignee agrees to be bound by all the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT applicable to the assignor.

14.4. GOVERNING LAW; VENUE. This AGREEMENT and the PARTIES' respective rights and obligations hereunder will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws, whether common law or statutory.

35

14.5. SEVERABILITY. If one or more of the sections, provisions, paragraphs, words, clauses, phrases or sentences contained herein, or the application thereof in any circumstances, is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect for any reason, the validity, legality and enforceability of any such section, provision, paragraph, word, clause, phrase or sentence in every other respect and of the remaining sections, provisions, paragraphs, words, clauses, phrases or sentences hereof will not be in any way impaired, it being intended that all rights, powers and privileges of the PARTIES hereto will be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

14.6. AMENDMENTS AND WAIVERS. This AGREEMENT may be amended only by a written instrument executed by both PARTIES. Any amendment effected in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence will be binding on all of the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT. No failure or delay by any Party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder will operate as a waiver thereof nor will any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.

14.7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT, together with any exhibits, appendixes and attachments hereto, constitutes the complete and exclusive agreement between the PARTIES regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all previous written or verbal agreements relating on this subject matter between the PARTIES, and all previous writings are merged and superseded by this AGREEMENT, including the LETTER, and including the Bilateral CDA executed on June 22nd, 2006 by the PARTIES, the Confidential Disclosure Agreement executed on May 5, 2005 by the PARTIES, and the Amendment to the Confidential Disclosure Agreement executed on June 5, 2006 by the PARTIES. This AGREEMENT may be modified only by a written document signed by all the PARTIES hereto.

14.8. BANKRUPTCY. In the event BIOLASE seeks or is involuntarily placed under the protection of the bankruptcy laws, Title XI U.S. Code, and the trustee in bankruptcy rejects this AGREEMENT, P&G hereby elects, pursuant to Section 365(n), to retain all rights granted to it under this AGREEMENT to the extent permitted by law. In the event P&G seeks or is involuntarily placed under the protection of the bankruptcy laws, Title XI U.S. Code, and the trustee in bankruptcy rejects this AGREEMENT, BIOLASE hereby elects, pursuant to
Section 365(n), to retain all rights granted to it under this AGREEMENT to the extent permitted by law.

14.9. COUNTERPARTS. This AGREEMENT may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by different PARTIES on separate counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together will constitute one and the same original.

14.10. NOTICES. Any and all notices required or permitted to be given to a PARTY pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT will be in writing and will be effective and deemed to provide such PARTY sufficient notice under

36

this AGREEMENT on the earliest of the following: (i) at the time of personal delivery, if delivery is in person; (ii) at the time of transmission by facsimile, addressed to the other Party at its facsimile number specified herein (or hereafter modified by subsequent notice to the PARTIES hereto), with confirmation of receipt made by both telephone and printed confirmation sheet verifying successful transmission of the facsimile; or (iii) one (1) business day after deposit with an express overnight courier for United States deliveries, or two
(2) business days after such deposit for deliveries outside of the United States, with proof of delivery from the courier requested. All notices for delivery outside the United States will be sent by facsimile or by express courier. Notices by facsimile shall be machine verified as received. All notices not delivered personally or by facsimile will be sent with postage and/or other charges prepaid and properly addressed to the PARTY to be notified at the address or facsimile number as follows, or at such other address or facsimile number as such other PARTY may designate by one of the indicated means of notice herein to the other PARTIES hereto as follows:

if to P&G:

The Procter & Gamble Company

Two Procter & Gamble Plaza Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Attention: Jeffrey D. Weedman Vice President, External Business Development

With copies to:

[* * *]
[* * *]
[* * *]
[* * *]
[* * *]
[* * *]

if to BIOLASE:

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, Inc.
4 Cromwell, Irvine CA 92618

Attention: Richard Harrison Chief Financial Officer

37

With copies to:

Charles K. Ruck, Esq.

Latham & Watkins, LLP
650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925

Tel: (714) 540-1235
Fax: (714) 755-8290
Email: charles.ruck@lw.com

14.11. PRESS RELEASES AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. Any press releases, public announcements or similar publicity with respect to this AGREEMENT or the transactions contemplated hereby (including, without limitation, standard question and answer responses, scripts for press briefings, and other disclosure) must be approved by both PARTIES in advance with respect to both timing and content of the disclosure, provided that nothing herein will prevent either PARTY or their respective AFFILIATES, upon reasonable notice to the other PARTY, from making public disclosures that are necessary to comply with the requirements of law or any listing agreement with any national securities exchange.

14.12. FORCE MAJEURE. Should either Party be prevented from performing its obligations under this AGREEMENT by an event of force majeure, such as an earthquake, typhoon, flood, fire, act of war, act of the public enemy, act of terrorism, act of God or any other unforeseen event the happening and consequences of which are unpreventable and unavoidable, the prevented Party shall notify the other PARTY BY the most expedient means available (fax, telex or express mail being acceptable in any event) without any delay, and within [* * *] thereafter provide detailed information of the events and, if applicable and available, a valid document for evidence issued by the relevant public notary organization explaining the reason for its inability to perform or delay in the performance of all or part of this AGREEMENT. The PARTIES shall discuss in good faith, taking into account the effects of the force majeure and other unforeseen events on the performance of the obligations under this AGREEMENT, whether to (a) exempt the prevented Party from performing part or all of its obligations under this AGREEMENT or (b) delay the performance of the affected obligations under this AGREEMENT. In the absence of any such agreement, no PARTY shall be excused from its performance hereunder once the event of force majeure has subsided.

14.13. FURTHER ASSURANCES. Except as otherwise specifically agreed to herein, the PARTIES agree to execute such further documentation and perform such further actions, including the recordation of such documentation with appropriate authorities, as may be reasonably requested by the other PARTY hereto to evidence, effectuate and further the purposes and intents set forth in this AGREEMENT.

38

14.14. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Except for the rights of the INDEMNIFIED PARTIES pursuant to Section 13, nothing in this AGREEMENT, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any Person, other than the PARTIES hereto or their respective successors and permitted assigns, any rights, remedies, benefits, obligations or liabilities of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this AGREEMENT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto caused this AGREEMENT to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

By:

Name: Richard L. Harrison Title: Executive Vice President, CFO & Secretary

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

By:
   ---------------------------------------------

   Name:   Jeffrey D. Weedman
   Title:  Vice President, External Business Development

39

EXHIBIT A

BIOLASE PATENTS WITHIN THE PRIMARY P&G FIELD OF USE

U.S. patent and applications listed in this Exhibit A, including any parent applications, continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, re-exams, reissues, and any foreign equivalents thereof.

                                                                                                   BIOLASE
Country      Status        Application No.         Publication No.          Patent No.             Docket No.            Title
-------    ---------      ----------------       -------------------   ------------------      ------------------     -----------
 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]                                                                                                  [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]                                                                                                  [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]                                                                                                  [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
           [*  *  *]                                                                                                  [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                             [*      *       *]      [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]                             [*      *       *]                                                   [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                                            [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]

 [**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                             [*      *       *]      [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                      [*   *   *]

40

[**]      [*  *  *]                                                   [*      *       *]                             [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]       [*      *       *]                            [*    *    *]          [*   *   *]
                                                [*  *]                                                               [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*    *    *]          [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]       [*      *       *]                            [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
          [*  *  *]      [* *]                                                                                       [*   *   *]
          [*  *  *]                                                                                                  [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
                         [* *]                                                                                       [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]       [*      *       *]                            [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

[**]      [*  *  *]      [*     *      *]                                                     [*      *       *]     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]
                                                                                                                     [*   *   *]

41

Exhibit B

BIOLASE PATENTS within THE [* * *] FIELD OF USE

U.S. patents and applications listed in this Exhibit B, including any parent applications, continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, re-exams, reissues, and any foreign equivalents thereof, and any other patent or patent application related to the [* * *] Field.

                                                                                                   BIOLASE
Country       Status        Application No.         Publication No.          Patent No.             Docket No.            Title
-------    -----------      ---------------        -------------------   ------------------      ------------------     -----------

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
           [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                                             [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
           [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                                             [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
           [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                                             [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
           [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                                             [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                [*     *     *]          [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]          [*     *     *]       [*     *     *]          [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

[**]       [*   *   *]      [*     *     *]                                                         [*   *   *]         [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]
                                                                                                                        [*   *    *]

42

Exhibit C

BIOLASE PATENTS within the P&G FIELDS OF USE (excluding the primary P&G Field OF USE) and biolase patents within the BIOLASE RETAINED FIELD CATegories offered to, and accepted by, P&G under Section 2.4.1 (This exhibit c is not meant to expand thE Rights otherwise granted under this agreement)

(Blank as of EFFECTIVE DATE-BIOLASE to populate [* * *] after the EFFECTIVE DATE of this AGREEMENT)

43

EXHIBIT D

P&G [* * *] PRODUCT CATEGORIES WITHIN P&G FIELDS OF USE

[* * *] [Remainder of page redacted]

44

EXHIBIT E
PURCHASE PRICE DETERMINATION

Purchase Price refers to purchase by P&G of the BIOLASE PATENTS and related interests as shall be the subject of an election by P&G to purchase, and shall be equal to the PURCHASE PRICE agreed to by the PARTIES or the VALUATION (as defined herein) of such interest to be purchased under this AGREEMENT, determined as follows: each PARTY shall [* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ](a "VALUATION").

The [* * *] will be [* * *] VALUATION within [* * *] after the Purchase Date as defined herein. In the event of a PARTY'S failure to [* * *
* * * * * *] after the Purchase Date, the VALUATION will be the VALUATION determined by [* * * * * * *].

If the difference between the lower VALUATION and the higher VALUATION is not more than [* * *] of the higher VALUATION, or if the VALUATIONS are equal, the final VALUATION shall be the [* * * * *]. If the difference between the two (2) VALUATIONS is more than [* * *] of the higher VALUATION, the FIRMS
[* * * *] and [* * *] prepare a VALUATION. The [* * *] will not have access to the VALUATIONS prepared [* * *]. The two (2) VALUATIONS that are the closest in value then shall be [* * *], and the resulting [* * *] shall be the final VALUATION.

The purchase of the BIOLASE PATENTS shall thereafter be consummated by payment of the VALUATION within [* * *] after [* * *] the VALUATIONS [* * * * *] or such later date upon which all necessary regulatory approvals have been obtained and/or regulatory waiting periods have expired.

Each PARTY shall bear the expense of obtaining the VALUATION [* * * * * *], and [* * * *], the expense of obtaining its VALUATION shall be borne equally by the PARTIES.

Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the PARTIES, the VALUATION for the BIOLASE PATENTS shall be [* * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * *](such date shall be referred to as the "Purchase Date").

During the pendency of the option election and VALUATION process, the PARTIES shall continue to perform their customary activities under this AGREEMENT.

45

 

EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jeffrey W. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of BIOLASE Technology, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of BIOLASE Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other consolidated financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b.   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 
  d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Dated: May 10, 2007  By:   /s/ JEFFREY W. JONES    
    Jeffrey W. Jones  
    President and Chief Executive Officer   

 

 

         
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,   Richard L. Harrison, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BIOLASE Technology, Inc., certify that:
 
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of BIOLASE Technology, Inc.;
 
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other consolidated financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b.   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 
  d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Dated: May 10, 2007  By:   /s/ RICHARD L. HARRISON    
    Richard L. Harrison    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   

 

 

         
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Jeffrey W. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of BIOLASE Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)   This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Dated: May 10, 2007  /s/ JEFFREY W. JONES    
  Jeffrey W. Jones    
  President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
 
*   This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Richard L. Harrison, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BIOLASE Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)   This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Dated: May 10, 2007  /s/ RICHARD L. HARRISON    
  Richard L. Harrison    
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
 
 
*   This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.