REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
☒
|
Pre‑Effective Amendment No.
|
☐
|
Post‑Effective Amendment No. 237
|
☒
|
and
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
|
☒
|
Amendment No.
238
|
☒
|
☒
|
immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
☐
|
on _____________ pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
☐
|
60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
☐
|
on _____________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
☐
|
75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
|
☐
|
on _____________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.
|
[ ] |
this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.
|
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
$74
|
$230
|
● |
Equity Market Risk.
The equity securities held in the Fund’s portfolio may experience sudden, unpredictable drops in value or long periods of decline in value. This may occur because of factors that affect securities markets generally or factors affecting specific issuers, industries, or sectors in which the Fund invests. Common stocks, such as those held by the Fund, are generally exposed to greater risk than other types of securities, such as preferred stock and debt obligations, because common stockholders generally have inferior rights to receive payment from issuers.
|
● |
Mid-Cap Companies Risk.
The Fund may invest in the securities of mid-capitalization companies. As a result, the Fund may be more volatile than funds that invest in larger, more established companies. The securities of mid-capitalization companies generally trade in lower volumes and are subject to greater and more unpredictable price changes than larger capitalization stocks or the stock market as a whole. Mid-capitalization companies may be particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates, government regulation, borrowing costs, and earnings.
|
● |
Models and Data Risk.
The composition of the Index is heavily dependent on proprietary quantitative models as well as information and data supplied by third parties (“Models and Data”). In particular, the Index is dependent on the accuracy and completeness of campaign contribution data reported to and by the FEC. When Models and Data prove to be incorrect or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon may lead to the inclusion or exclusion of securities from the Index universe that would have been excluded or included had the Models and Data been correct and complete. If the composition of the Index reflects such errors, the Fund’s portfolio can be expected to reflect the errors, too.
|
● |
New Fund Risk.
The Fund is a recently organized, non-diversified management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors have no track record or history on which to base their investment decision.
|
● |
Non-Diversification Risk.
Although the Fund intends to invest in a variety of securities and instruments, the Fund will be considered to be non-diversified, which means that it may invest more of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it were a diversified fund. As a result, the Fund may be more exposed to the risks associated with and developments affecting an individual issuer or a smaller number of issuers than a fund that invests more widely. This may increase the Fund’s volatility and cause the performance of a relatively smaller number of issuers to have a greater impact on the Fund’s performance.
|
● |
Non-Financial Factors Risk.
Because the methodology of the Index selects securities of issuers for non-financial reasons, the Fund may underperform the broader equity market or other funds that do not utilize similar criteria when selecting investments.
|
● |
Passive Investment Risk.
The Fund is not actively managed, and the Fund’s adviser would not sell shares of an equity security due to current or projected underperformance of a security, industry, or sector, unless that security is removed from the Index or the selling of shares of that security is otherwise required upon a reconstitution of the Index in accordance with the Index methodology.
|
● |
REIT Investment Risk.
Investments in REITs involve unique risks. REITs may have limited financial resources, may trade less frequently and in limited volume, and may be more volatile than other securities. The risks of investing in REITs include certain risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate and the real estate industry in general. Securities in the real estate sector are subject to the risk that the value of their underlying real estate may go down. Many factors may affect real estate values, including the general and local economies, the amount of new construction in a particular area, the laws and regulations (including zoning and tax laws) affecting real estate, and the costs of owning, maintaining and improving real estate. The availability of mortgages and changes in interest rates may also affect real estate values. REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, and self-liquidation.
|
● |
Sector Risk.
To the extent the Fund invests more heavily in particular sectors of the economy, its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors.
|
● |
Shares May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV.
As with all ETFs, Shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of Shares will approximate the Fund’s NAV, there may be times when the market price of Shares is more than the NAV intra-day (premium) or less than the NAV intra-day (discount) due to supply and demand of Shares or during periods of market volatility. This risk is heightened in times of market volatility, periods of steep market declines, and periods when there is limited trading activity for Shares in the secondary market, in which case such premiums or discounts may be significant.
|
● |
Tracking Error Risk.
As with all index funds, the performance of the Fund and its Index may differ from each other for a variety of reasons. For example, the Fund incurs operating expenses and portfolio transaction costs not incurred by the Index. In addition, the Fund may not be fully invested in the securities of the Index at all times or may hold securities not included in the Index.
|
Adviser
|
Point Bridge Capital, LLC
|
Sub-Adviser | Vident Investment Advisory, LLC (“VIA” or the “Sub-Adviser”) |
Portfolio Manager |
Denise M. Krisko, CFA, President of VIA, has been portfolio manager of the Fund since its inception in 2017.
|
● |
Equity Market Risk.
Common stocks are susceptible to general stock market fluctuations and to volatile increases and decreases in value as market confidence in and perceptions of their issuers change. These investor perceptions are based on various and unpredictable factors including: expectations regarding government, economic, monetary and fiscal policies; inflation and interest rates; economic expansion or contraction; and global or regional political, economic and banking crises. If you held common stock, or common stock equivalents, of any given issuer, you would generally be exposed to greater risk than if you held preferred stocks and debt obligations of the issuer because common stockholders, or holders of equivalent interests, generally have inferior rights to receive payments from issuers in comparison with the rights of preferred stockholders, bondholders, and other creditors of such issuers.
|
● |
Mid-Cap Companies Risk.
The Fund may invest in the securities of mid-capitalization companies. As a result, the Fund may be more volatile than funds that invest in larger, more established companies. The securities of mid-capitalization companies generally trade in lower volumes and are subject to greater and more unpredictable price changes than larger capitalization stocks or the stock market as a whole. Mid-capitalization companies may be particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates, government regulation, borrowing costs, and earnings. The securities of mid-capitalization companies may be more vulnerable to adverse issuer, market, political, or economic developments than securities of large-capitalization companies. Some mid-capitalization companies have limited product lines, markets, financial resources, and management personnel and tend to concentrate on fewer geographical markets relative to large-capitalization companies.
|
● |
Models and Data Risk.
The Index relies heavily on proprietary quantitative Models and Data. Because the Index is composed based on such Models and Data, when such Models and Data prove to be incorrect or incomplete, the Index and the Fund may not perform as expected. The Index is dependent on the accuracy and completeness of campaign contribution data reported to and by the FEC. Federal campaign finance laws do not presently require that aggregate donations of $200 or less to a single candidate during an election cycle be reported to the FEC. Consequently, the FEC data on which the Index is based may not reflect all campaign contributions. Additionally, because campaign contribution data is not independently verified with respect to each individual contribution, there is a risk that such data may reflect inaccurate information (e.g., a misspelled company’s name) resulting in inaccuracies in the larger FEC data set. Further, there are a variety of ways for donors to make significant contributions that benefit one or more candidates, but which contributions are made to organizations that are not required to publicly disclose their donors (e.g., a social welfare organization operating under sectin 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”)). Consequently, FEC data may not fully reflect the amount of contributions made by a company’s employees or the candidates or groups to which such contributions are made.
|
● |
New Fund Risk.
The Fund is a recently organized, non-diversified management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors have no track record or history on which to base their investment decision.
|
● |
Non-Diversification Risk.
Although the Fund intends to invest in a variety of securities and instruments, the Fund will be considered to be non-diversified, which means that it may invest more of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it were a diversified fund. As a result, the Fund may be more exposed to the risks associated with and developments affecting an individual issuer or a smaller number of issuers than a fund that invests more widely. This may increase the Fund’s volatility and cause the performance of a relatively smaller number of issuers to have a greater impact on the Fund’s performance.
|
● |
Non-Financial Factors Risk.
Because the methodology of the Index selects securities of issuers for non-financial reasons, the Fund may underperform the broader equity market or other funds that do not utilize similar criteria when selecting investments.
|
● |
Passive Investment Risk.
The Fund invests in the securities included in, or representative of, its Index regardless of their investment merit. The Fund does not attempt to outperform its Index or take defensive positions in declining markets. As a result, the Fund’s performance may be adversely affected by a general decline in the market segments relating to its Index.
The returns from the types of securities in which the Fund invests may underperform returns from the various general securities markets or different asset classes. This may cause the Fund to underperform other investment vehicles that invest in different asset classes. Different types of securities (for example, large-, mid- and small-capitalization stocks) tend to go through cycles of doing better – or worse – than the general securities markets. In the past, these periods have lasted for as long as several years.
|
● |
REIT Risk.
Investments in REITs involve unique risks. REITs may have limited financial resources, may trade less frequently and in limited volume, and may be more volatile than other securities. In addition, to the extent the Fund holds interests in REITs, it is expected that investors in the Fund will bear two layers of asset-based management fees and expenses (directly at the Fund level and indirectly at the REIT level). The risks of investing in REITs include certain risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate and the real estate industry in general. These include risks related to general, regional and local economic conditions; fluctuations in interest rates and property tax rates; shifts in zoning laws, environmental regulations and other governmental action such as the exercise of eminent domain; cash flow dependency; increased operating expenses; lack of availability of mortgage funds; losses due to natural disasters; overbuilding; losses due to casualty or condemnation; changes in property values and rental rates; and other factors.
|
● |
Sector Risk.
The Fund’s investing approach may dictate an emphasis on certain sectors, industries, or sub-sectors of the market at any given time. To the extent the Fund invests more heavily in one sector, industry, or sub-sector of the market, it thereby presents a more concentrated risk and its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors, industries, or sub-sectors. In addition, the value of Shares may change at different rates compared to the value of shares of a fund with investments in a more diversified mix of sectors and industries. An individual sector, industry, or sub-sector of the market may have above-average performance during particular periods, but may also move up and down more than the broader market. The several industries that constitute a sector may all react in the same way to economic, political or regulatory events. The Fund’s performance could also be affected if the sectors, industries, or sub-sectors do not perform as expected. Alternatively, the lack of exposure to one or more sectors or industries may adversely affect performance.
|
● |
Shares May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV.
As with all ETFs, Shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of Shares will approximate the Fund’s NAV, there may be times when the market price and the NAV vary significantly, including due to supply and demand of Shares and/or during periods of market volatility. Thus, you may pay more (or less) than NAV intra-day when you buy Shares in the secondary market, and you may receive more (or less) than NAV when you sell those Shares in the secondary market. This risk is heightened in times of market volatility, periods of steep market declines, and periods when there is limited trading activity for Shares in the secondary market, in which case such premiums or discounts may be significant.
|
● |
Tracking Error Risk.
As with all index funds, the performance of the Fund and its Index may vary somewhat for a variety of reasons. For example, the Fund incurs operating expenses and portfolio transaction costs not incurred by its Index. In addition, the Fund may not be fully invested in the securities of its Index at all times or may hold securities not included in its Index. The use of sampling techniques may affect the Fund’s ability to achieve close correlation with its Index. The Fund may use a representative sampling strategy to achieve its investment objective, if the Fund’s sub-adviser believes it is in the best interest of the Fund, which generally can be expected to produce a greater non-correlation risk.
|
Adviser and
Index Provider |
Point Bridge Capital, LLC
300 Throckmorton Street Suite 1550
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
|
Transfer Agent
and Index Receipt Agent |
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
|
||||||
Sub-Adviser
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
300 Colonial Center Parkway,
Suite 330
Roswell, GA 30076
|
Administrator
|
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
|
||||||
Custodian
|
U.S. Bank National Association
1555 N. Rivercenter Dr.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212
|
Distributor
|
Foreside Fund Services, LLC
Three Canal Plaza
Portland, ME 04101
|
||||||
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Cohen & Company, Ltd.
1350 Euclid Avenue, Suite 800
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
|
Legal Counsel |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004-2541
|
||||||
|
|
● |
Free of charge from the SEC’s EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; or
|
● |
Free of charge from the Fund’s Internet web site at www.investpolitically.com; or
|
● |
For a fee, by writing to the Public Reference Room of the Commission, Washington, DC 20549-1520; or
|
● |
For a fee, by e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov.
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
13
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
24
|
|
25
|
|
25
|
|
30
|
|
A-1
|
1.
|
Concentrate its investments (i.e., hold more than 25% of its total assets) in any industry or group of related industries, except that the Fund will concentrate to approximately the same extent that the Index concentrates in the securities of such particular industry or group of related industries. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government (including its agencies and instrumentalities), repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. government securities, and tax-exempt securities of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions are not considered to be issued by members of any industry.
|
2.
|
Borrow
money or issue senior securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
|
3.
|
Make loans, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
|
4.
|
Purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act. This shall not prevent the Fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate, real estate investment trusts or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business.
|
5.
|
Purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act. This shall not prevent the Fund from purchasing or selling options and futures contracts or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities.
|
6.
|
Underwrite securities issued by other persons, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
|
1.
|
The Fund will not hold illiquid assets in excess of 15% of its net assets. An illiquid asset is any asset which may not be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the value at which the Fund has valued the investment.
|
2.
|
The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in the component securities of the Index.
|
Name and
Year of Birth |
Position Held with the Trust
|
Term of Office and Length of Time Served
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee
|
Other Directorships Held by Trustee
During Past 5 Years
|
Independent Trustees
|
|||||
Leonard M. Rush, CPA
Born: 1946
|
Lead Independent Trustee and Audit Committee Chairman
|
Indefinite term; since 2012
|
Retired; formerly Chief Financial Officer, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (wealth management firm) (2000–2011).
|
20
|
Independent Trustee, Managed Portfolio Series (37 portfolios); Director, Anchor Bancorp Wisconsin, Inc. (2011–2013).
|
Ronald T. Beckman, CPA
Born: 1947
|
Trustee and Nominating Committee Chairman
|
Indefinite term; since 2012
|
Retired; formerly Audit Partner specializing in investment management, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1972–2004).
|
20
|
None
|
David A. Massart
Born: 1967
|
Trustee
|
Indefinite term; since 2012
|
Co-Founder, President and Chief Investment Strategist, Next Generation Wealth Management, Inc. (since 2005).
|
20
|
Independent Trustee, Managed Portfolio Series
(37 portfolios).
|
Interested Trustee
|
|||||
Michael A. Castino
Born: 1967
|
Trustee and Chairman
|
Indefinite term; Trustee since 2014; Chairman since 2013
|
Senior Vice President, USBFS (since 2013); Managing Director of Index Services, Zacks Investment Management (2011–2013).
|
20
|
None
|
Name and
Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held with the Trust
|
Term of Office and Length of Time Served
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years |
Paul R. Fearday, CPA
Born: 1979
|
President and Assistant Treasurer
|
Indefinite term; President and Assistant Treasurer since 2014 (other roles since 2013)
|
Senior Vice President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2008); Manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (accounting firm) (2002–2008).
|
Michael D. Barolsky, Esq.
Born: 1981
|
Vice President and Secretary
|
Indefinite term; since 2014 (other roles since 2013)
|
Vice President, USBFS (since 2012); Associate, Thompson Hine LLP (law firm) (2008–2012).
|
James R. Butz
Born: 1982
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
Indefinite term; since 2015
|
Senior Vice President, USBFS (since 2015); Vice President, USBFS (2014–2015); Assistant Vice President, USBFS (2011–2014).
|
Kristen M. Weitzel, CPA
Born: 1977
|
Treasurer
|
Indefinite term; since 2014 (other roles since 2013)
|
Vice President, USBFS (since 2015); Assistant Vice President, USBFS (2011–2015); Manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (accounting firm) (2005–2011).
|
Stacie L. Lamb, Esq.
Born: 1982
|
Assistant Secretary
|
Indefinite term; since 2015
|
Assistant Vice President, USBFS (since 2013); Compliance Representative, Quasar Distributors, LLC (2011–2013).
|
Name
|
Aggregate Compensation From Fund
|
Total Compensation From Fund Complex Paid to Trustees
|
Interested Trustee
|
||
Michael A. Castino
|
$0
|
$0
|
Independent Trustees
|
||
Ronald T. Beckman, CPA
|
$0
|
$63,000
|
David A. Massart
|
$0
|
$63,000
|
Leonard M. Rush, CPA
|
$0
|
$72,500
|
Type of Accounts
|
Total Number of Accounts
|
Total Assets of Accounts
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
21
|
$3.217 billion
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
1
|
$15.2 million
|
Other Accounts
|
0
|
$0
|
United States
Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines
|
2017 Benchmark Policy Recommendations
|
Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017
Published January 17, 2017
|
|
2017 U.S. Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote for director nominees, except under the following circumstances:
|
1.
|
Accountability
|
1.1.
|
The board is classified, and a continuing director responsible for a problematic governance issue at the board/committee level that would warrant a withhold/against vote recommendation is not up for election. All appropriate nominees (except new) may be held accountable.
|
1.2.
|
The board lacks accountability and oversight, coupled with sustained poor performance relative to peers. Sustained poor performance is measured by one- and three-year total shareholder returns in the bottom half of
a company's four-digit GICS industry group (Russell 3000 companies only). Take into consideration the company's five-year total shareholder return and operational metrics. Problematic provisions include but are not limited to:
|
›
|
A classified board structure;
|
›
|
A supermajority vote requirement;
|
›
|
Either a plurality vote standard in uncontested director elections or a majority vote standard with no plurality carve-out for contested elections;
|
›
|
The inability of shareholders to call special meetings;
|
›
|
The inability of shareholders to act by written consent;
|
›
|
A dual-class capital structure; and/or
|
›
|
A non-shareholder-approved poison pill.
|
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
2 of 17
|
1.3.
|
The company's poison pill has a "dead-hand" or "modified dead-hand" feature. Vote against or withhold from nominees every year until this feature is removed;
|
1.4.
|
The board adopts a poison pill with a term of more than 12 months ("long-term pill"), or renews any existing pill, including any "short-term pill" (12 months or less), without shareholder approval. A commitment or policy that puts a newly adopted pill to a binding shareholder vote may potentially offset an adverse vote recommendation. Review such companies with classified boards every year, and such companies with annually elected boards at least once every three years, and vote against or withhold votes from all nominees if the company still maintains a non-shareholder-approved poison pill; or
|
1.5.
|
The board makes a material adverse change to an existing poison pill without shareholder approval.
|
1.6.
|
The board adopts a poison pill with a term of 12 months or less ("short-term pill") without shareholder approval, taking into account the following factors:
|
›
|
The date of the pill's adoption relative to the date of the next meeting of shareholders—i.e. whether the company had time to put the pill on the ballot for shareholder ratification given the circumstances;
|
›
|
The issuer's rationale;
|
›
|
The issuer's governance structure and practices; and
|
›
|
The issuer's track record of accountability to shareholders.
|
1.7.
|
The company's charter imposes undue restrictions on shareholders' ability to amend the bylaws. Such restrictions include, but are not limited to: outright prohibition on the submission of binding shareholder proposals, or share ownership requirements or time holding requirements in excess of SEC Rule 14a-8. Vote against on an ongoing basis.
|
1.8.
|
The non-audit fees paid to the auditor are excessive (see discussion under "
Auditor Ratification
");
|
1.9.
|
The company receives an adverse opinion on the company's financial statements from its auditor; or
|
1.10.
|
There is persuasive evidence that the Audit Committee entered into an inappropriate indemnification agreement with its auditor that limits the ability of the company, or its shareholders, to pursue legitimate legal recourse against the audit firm.
|
1.11.
|
Poor accounting practices are identified that rise to a level of serious concern, such as: fraud; misapplication of GAAP; and material weaknesses identified in Section 404 disclosures. Examine the severity, breadth, chronological sequence, and duration, as well as the company's efforts at remediation or corrective actions, in determining whether withhold/against votes are warranted.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
3 of 17
|
1.12.
|
There is a significant misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay for performance);
|
1.13.
|
The company maintains significant problematic pay practices;
|
1.14.
|
The board exhibits a significant level of poor communication and responsiveness
to shareholders;
|
1.15.
|
The company fails to submit one-time transfers of stock options
to a shareholder vote; or
|
1.16.
|
The company fails to fulfill the terms of a burn-rate commitment made to shareholders.
|
1.17.
|
The company's previous say-on-pay received the support of less than 70 percent of votes cast, taking into account:
|
›
|
The company's response, including:
|
›
|
Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors regarding the issues that contributed to the low level of support;
|
›
|
Specific actions taken to address the issues that contributed to the low level of support;
|
›
|
Other recent compensation actions taken by the company;
|
›
|
Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
|
›
|
The company's ownership structure; and
|
›
|
Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness.
|
1.18.
|
Generally vote against or withhold from directors individually, committee members, or the entire board (except new nominees, who should be considered case-by-case) if the board amends the company's bylaws or charter without shareholder approval in a manner that materially diminishes shareholders' rights or that could adversely impact shareholders, considering the following factors:
|
›
|
The board's rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder ratification;
|
›
|
Disclosure by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the amendment;
|
›
|
The level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the board's unilateral amendment to the bylaws/charter;
|
›
|
The board's track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter amendments or other entrenchment provisions;
|
›
|
The company's ownership structure;
|
›
|
The company's existing governance provisions;
|
›
|
The timing of the board's amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a significant business development; and
|
›
|
Other factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of the amendment on shareholders.
|
›
|
Classified the board;
|
›
|
Adopted supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter; or
|
›
|
Eliminated shareholders' ability to amend bylaws.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
4 of 17
|
1.19.
|
For newly public companies, generally vote against or withhold from directors individually, committee members, or the entire board (except new nominees, who should be considered case-by-case) if, prior to or in connection with the company's public offering, the company or its board adopted bylaw or charter provisions materially adverse to shareholder rights, or implemented a multi-class capital structure in which the classes have unequal voting rights considering the following factors:
|
›
|
The level of impairment of shareholders' rights;
|
›
|
The disclosed rationale;
|
›
|
The ability to change the governance structure (e.g., limitations on shareholders' right to amend the bylaws or charter, or supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter);
|
›
|
The ability of shareholders to hold directors accountable through annual director elections, or whether the company has a classified board structure;
|
›
|
Any reasonable sunset provision; and
|
›
|
Other relevant factors.
|
1.20.
|
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight
3
, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
1.21.
|
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
1.22.
|
Egregious actions related to a director's service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
|
2.
|
Responsiveness
|
2.1.
|
The board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received the support of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year. Factors that will be considered are:
|
›
|
Disclosed outreach efforts by the board to shareholders in the wake of the vote;
|
›
|
Rationale provided in the proxy statement for the level of implementation;
|
›
|
The subject matter of the proposal;
|
›
|
The level of support for and opposition to the resolution in past meetings;
|
›
|
Actions taken by the board in response to the majority vote and its engagement with shareholders;
|
›
|
The continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot (as either shareholder or management proposals); and
|
›
|
Other factors as appropriate.
|
2.2.
|
The board failed to act on takeover offers where the majority of shares are tendered;
|
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
5 of 17
|
2.3.
|
At the previous board election, any director received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast and the company has failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote;
|
2.4.
|
The board implements an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent basis than the frequency that received the majority of votes cast at the most recent shareholder meeting at which shareholders voted on the say-on-pay frequency; or
|
2.5.
|
The board implements an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent basis than the frequency that received a plurality, but not a majority, of the votes cast at the most recent shareholder meeting at which shareholders voted on the say-on-pay frequency, taking into account:
|
›
|
The board's rationale for selecting a frequency that is different from the frequency that received a plurality;
|
›
|
The company's ownership structure and vote results;
|
›
|
ISS' analysis of whether there are compensation concerns or a history of problematic compensation practices; and
|
›
|
The previous year's support level on the company's say-on-pay proposal.
|
3.
|
Composition
|
3.1.
|
Generally vote against or withhold from directors (except new nominees, who should be considered case-by-case
4
) who attend less than 75 percent of the aggregate of their board and committee meetings for the period for which they served, unless an acceptable reason for absences is disclosed in the proxy or another SEC filing. Acceptable reasons for director absences are generally limited to the following:
|
›
|
Medical issues/illness;
|
›
|
Family emergencies; and
|
›
|
Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer).
|
3.2.
|
If the proxy disclosure is unclear and insufficient to determine whether a director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of his/her board and committee meetings during his/her period of service, vote against or withhold from the director(s) in question.
|
3.3.
|
Sit on more than five public company boards; or
|
3.4.
|
Are CEOs of public companies who sit on the boards of more than two public companies besides their own—withhold only at their outside boards
5
.
|
4.
|
Independence
|
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
6 of 17
|
4.1.
|
The inside or affiliated outside director serves on any of the three key committees: audit, compensation, or nominating;
|
4.2.
|
The company lacks an audit, compensation, or nominating committee so that the full board functions as that committee;
|
4.3.
|
The company lacks a formal nominating committee, even if the board attests that the independent directors fulfill the functions of such a committee; or
|
4.4.
|
Independent directors make up less than a majority of the directors.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote for shareholder proposals requiring that the chairman's position be filled by an independent director, taking into consideration the following:
|
›
|
The scope of the proposal;
|
›
|
The company's current board leadership structure;
|
›
|
The company's governance structure and practices;
|
›
|
Company performance; and
|
›
|
Any other relevant factors that may be applicable.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote for management and shareholder proposals for proxy access with the following provisions:
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
7 of 17
|
›
|
Ownership threshold:
maximum requirement not more than three percent (3%) of the voting power;
|
›
|
Ownership duration:
maximum requirement not longer than three (3) years of continuous ownership for each member of the nominating group;
|
›
|
Aggregation:
minimal or no limits on the number of shareholders permitted to form a nominating group;
|
›
|
Cap:
cap on nominees of generally twenty-five percent (25%) of the board.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote case-by-case on the election of directors in contested elections, considering the following factors:
|
›
|
Long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry;
|
›
|
Management's track record;
|
›
|
Background to the contested election;
|
›
|
Nominee qualifications and any compensatory arrangements;
|
›
|
Strategic plan of dissident slate and quality of the critique against management;
|
›
|
Likelihood that the proposed goals and objectives can be achieved (both slates); and
|
›
|
Stock ownership positions.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote for proposals to increase the number of authorized common shares where the primary purpose of the increase is to issue shares in connection with a transaction on the same ballot that warrants support.
|
›
|
Past Board Performance
:
|
›
|
The company's use of authorized shares during the last three years;
|
›
|
The Current Request:
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
8 of 17
|
›
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of the specific purposes of the proposed increase;
|
›
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request; and
|
›
|
The dilutive impact of the request as determined relative to an allowable increase calculated by ISS (typically 100 percent of existing authorized shares) that reflects the company's need for shares and total shareholder returns.
|
A.
|
Most companies:
100 percent
of existing authorized shares.
|
B.
|
Companies with less than 50 percent of existing authorized shares either outstanding or reserved for issuance:
50 percent
of existing authorized shares.
|
C.
|
Companies with one- and three-year total shareholder returns (TSRs) in the bottom 10 percent of the U.S. market as of the end of the calendar quarter that is closest to their most recent fiscal year end:
50 percent
of existing authorized shares.
|
D.
|
Companies at which both conditions (B and C) above are both present:
25 percent
of existing authorized shares.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote case-by-case on mergers and acquisitions. Review and evaluate the merits and drawbacks of the proposed transaction, balancing various and sometimes countervailing factors including:
|
›
|
Valuation
- Is the value to be received by the target shareholders (or paid by the acquirer) reasonable? While the fairness opinion may provide an initial starting point for assessing valuation reasonableness, emphasis is placed on the offer premium, market reaction, and strategic rationale.
|
›
|
Market reaction
- How has the market responded to the proposed deal? A negative market reaction should cause closer scrutiny of a deal.
|
›
|
Strategic rationale
- Does the deal make sense strategically? From where is the value derived? Cost and revenue synergies should not be overly aggressive or optimistic, but reasonably achievable. Management should also have a favorable track record of successful integration of historical acquisitions.
|
›
|
Negotiations and process
- Were the terms of the transaction negotiated at arm's-length? Was the process fair and equitable? A fair process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders. Significant negotiation "wins" can also signify the deal makers' competency. The comprehensiveness of the sales process (e.g., full auction, partial auction, no auction) can also affect shareholder value.
|
›
|
Conflicts of interest
- Are insiders benefiting from the transaction disproportionately and inappropriately as compared to non-insider shareholders? As the result of potential conflicts, the directors and officers of the company may be more likely to vote to approve a merger than if they did not hold these interests. Consider whether these interests may have influenced these directors and officers to support or recommend the merger. The CIC figure presented in the "ISS Transaction Summary" section of this report is an aggregate figure that can in certain cases be a misleading indicator of the true value transfer from shareholders to insiders. Where such figure appears to be excessive, analyze the underlying assumptions to determine whether a potential conflict exists.
|
›
|
Governance
- Will the combined company have a better or worse governance profile than the current governance profiles of the respective parties to the transaction? If the governance profile is to change for the worse, the burden is on the company to prove that other issues (such as valuation) outweigh any deterioration in governance.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
9 of 17
|
1.
|
Maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment, with emphasis on long-term shareholder value: This principle encompasses overall executive pay practices, which must be designed to attract, retain, and appropriately motivate the key employees who drive shareholder value creation over the long term. It will take into consideration, among other factors, the link between pay and performance; the mix between fixed and variable pay; performance goals; and equity-based plan costs;
|
2.
|
Avoid arrangements that risk "pay for failure": This principle addresses the appropriateness of long or indefinite contracts, excessive severance packages, and guaranteed compensation;
|
3.
|
Maintain an independent and effective compensation committee: This principle promotes oversight of executive pay programs by directors with appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and a sound process for compensation decision-making (
e.g.
, including access to independent expertise and advice when needed);
|
4.
|
Provide shareholders with clear, comprehensive compensation disclosures: This principle underscores the importance of informative and timely disclosures that enable shareholders to evaluate executive pay practices fully and fairly;
|
5.
|
Avoid inappropriate pay to non-executive directors: This principle recognizes the interests of shareholders in ensuring that compensation to outside directors does not compromise their independence and ability to make appropriate judgments in overseeing managers' pay and performance. At the market level, it may incorporate a variety of generally accepted best practices.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote case-by-case on ballot items related to executive pay and practices, as well as certain aspects of outside director compensation.
|
›
|
There is a significant misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (
pay for performance
);
|
›
|
The company maintains significant
problematic pay practices
;
|
›
|
The board exhibits a significant level of
poor communication and responsiveness
to shareholders.
|
›
|
There is no MSOP on the ballot, and an against vote on an MSOP is warranted due to pay-for-performance misalignment, problematic pay practices, or the lack of adequate responsiveness on compensation issues raised previously, or a combination thereof;
|
›
|
The board fails to respond adequately to a previous MSOP proposal that received less than 70 percent support of votes cast;
|
›
|
The company has recently practiced or approved problematic pay practices, including option repricing or option backdating; or
|
›
|
The situation is egregious.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
10 of 17
|
1.
|
Peer Group
7
Alignment:
|
›
|
The degree of alignment between the company's annualized TSR rank and the CEO's annualized total pay rank within a peer group, each measured over a three-year period.
|
›
|
The multiple of the CEO's total pay relative to the peer group median.
|
2.
|
Absolute Alignment
8
– the absolute alignment between the trend in CEO pay and company TSR over the prior five fiscal years – i.e., the difference between the trend in annual pay changes and the trend in annualized TSR during the period.
|
›
|
The ratio of performance- to time-based equity awards;
|
›
|
The overall ratio of performance-based compensation;
|
›
|
The completeness of disclosure and rigor of performance goals;
|
›
|
The company's peer group benchmarking practices;
|
›
|
Actual results of financial/operational metrics, such as growth in revenue, profit, cash flow, etc., both absolute and relative to peers;
|
›
|
Special circumstances related to, for example, a new CEO in the prior FY or anomalous equity grant practices (e.g., bi-annual awards);
|
›
|
Realizable pay
9
compared to grant pay; and
|
›
|
Any other factors deemed relevant.
|
›
|
Problematic practices related to non-performance-based compensation elements;
|
›
|
Incentives that may motivate excessive risk-taking; and
|
›
|
Options backdating.
|
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
11 of 17
|
|
2017 U.S. Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines
|
›
|
Repricing or replacing of underwater stock options/SARS without prior shareholder approval (including cash buyouts and voluntary surrender of underwater options);
|
›
|
Excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups, including any gross-up related to a secular trust or restricted stock vesting;
|
›
|
New or extended agreements that provide for:
|
›
|
CIC payments exceeding 3 times base salary and average/target/most recent bonus;
|
›
|
CIC severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties ("single" or "modified single" triggers);
|
›
|
CIC payments with excise tax gross-ups (including "modified" gross-ups);
|
›
|
Insufficient executive compensation disclosure by externally-managed issuers (EMIs) such that a reasonable assessment of pay programs and practices applicable to the EMI's executives is not possible.
|
›
|
Multi-year guaranteed bonuses;
|
›
|
A single or common performance metric used for short- and long-term plans;
|
›
|
Lucrative severance packages;
|
›
|
High pay opportunities relative to industry peers;
|
›
|
Disproportionate supplemental pensions; or
|
›
|
Mega annual equity grants that provide unlimited upside with no downside risk.
|
›
|
Reason and motive for the options backdating issue, such as inadvertent vs. deliberate grant date changes;
|
›
|
Duration of options backdating;
|
›
|
Size of restatement due to options backdating;
|
›
|
Corrective actions taken by the board or compensation committee, such as canceling or re-pricing backdated options, the recouping of option gains on backdated grants; and
|
›
|
Adoption of a grant policy that prohibits backdating, and creates a fixed grant schedule or window period for equity grants in the future.
|
›
|
Failure to respond to majority-supported shareholder proposals on executive pay topics; or
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
12 of 17
|
›
|
Failure to adequately respond to the company's previous say-on-pay proposal that received the support of less than 70 percent of votes cast, taking into account:
|
›
|
The company's response, including:
|
›
|
Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors regarding the issues that contributed to the low level of support;
|
›
|
Specific actions taken to address the issues that contributed to the low level of support;
|
›
|
Other recent compensation actions taken by the company;
|
›
|
Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
|
›
|
The company's ownership structure; and
|
›
|
Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote for annual advisory votes on compensation, which provide the most consistent and clear communication channel for shareholder concerns about companies' executive pay programs.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Vote case-by-case on certain equity-based compensation plans
10
depending on a combination of certain plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors, and vice versa, as evaluated using an "equity plan scorecard" (EPSC) approach with three pillars:
|
›
|
Plan Cost:
The total estimated cost of the company's equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers, measured by the company's estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) in relation to peers and considering both:
|
›
|
SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and
|
›
|
SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants.
|
›
|
Plan Features:
|
›
|
Automatic single-triggered award vesting upon a change in control (CIC);
|
›
|
Discretionary vesting authority;
|
›
|
Liberal share recycling on various award types;
|
›
|
Lack of minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan;
|
›
|
Dividends payable prior to award vesting.
|
›
|
Grant Practices:
|
›
|
The company's three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers;
|
›
|
Vesting requirements in most recent CEO equity grants (3-year look-back);
|
›
|
The estimated duration of the plan (based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested, divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years);
|
›
|
The proportion of the CEO's most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions;
|
›
|
Whether the company maintains a claw-back policy;
|
›
|
Whether the company has established post-exercise/vesting share-holding requirements.
|
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
13 of 17
|
›
|
Awards may vest in connection with a liberal change-of-control definition;
|
›
|
The plan would permit repricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval (either by expressly permitting it – for NYSE and Nasdaq listed companies – or by not prohibiting it when the company has a history of repricing – for non-listed companies);
|
›
|
The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a significant pay-for-performance disconnect under certain circumstances; or
|
›
|
Any other plan features are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote case-by-case, taking into consideration whether implementation of the proposal is likely to enhance or protect shareholder value, and in addition the following will also be considered:
|
›
|
If the issues presented in the proposal are more appropriately or effectively dealt with through legislation or government regulation;
|
›
|
If the company has already responded in an appropriate and sufficient manner to the issue(s) raised in the proposal;
|
›
|
Whether the proposal's request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly prescriptive;
|
›
|
The company's approach compared with any industry standard practices for addressing the issue(s) raised by the proposal;
|
›
|
If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether or not reasonable and sufficient information is currently available to shareholders from the company or from other publicly available sources; and
|
›
|
If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether or not implementation would reveal proprietary or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive disadvantage.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote against proposals requesting that companies implement specific price restraints on pharmaceutical products unless the company fails to adhere to legislative guidelines or industry norms in its product pricing practices.
|
›
|
The potential for reputational, market, and regulatory risk exposure;
|
›
|
Existing disclosure of relevant policies;
|
›
|
Deviation from established industry norms;
|
›
|
Relevant company initiatives to provide research and/or products to disadvantaged consumers;
|
›
|
Whether the proposal focuses on specific products or geographic regions;
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
14 of 17
|
›
|
The potential burden and scope of the requested report;
|
›
|
Recent significant controversies, litigation, or fines at the company.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote for resolutions requesting that a company disclose information on the risks related to climate change on its operations and investments, such as financial, physical, or regulatory risks, considering:
|
›
|
Whether the company already provides current, publicly-available information on the impact that climate change may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities;
|
›
|
The company's level of disclosure is at least comparable to that of industry peers; and
|
›
|
There are no significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company's environmental performance.
|
›
|
The company already discloses current, publicly-available information on the impacts that GHG emissions may have on the company as well as associated company
policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities;
|
›
|
The company's level of disclosure is comparable to that of industry peers; and
|
›
|
There are no significant, controversies
, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company's GHG emissions.
|
›
|
Whether the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions performance data;
|
›
|
Whether company disclosure lags behind industry peers;
|
›
|
The company's actual GHG emissions performance;
|
›
|
The company's current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms, and related initiatives; and
|
›
|
Whether the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines, litigation, or controversy related to GHG emissions.
|
|
General Recommendation
:
Generally vote for requests for reports on a company's efforts to diversify the board, unless:
|
›
|
The gender and racial minority representation of the company's board is reasonably inclusive in relation to companies of similar size and business; and
|
›
|
The board already reports on its nominating procedures and gender and racial minority initiatives on the board and within the company.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
15 of 17
|
›
|
The degree of existing gender and racial minority diversity on the company's board and among its executive officers;
|
›
|
The level of gender and racial minority representation that exists at the company's industry peers;
|
›
|
The company's established process for addressing gender and racial minority board representation;
|
›
|
Whether the proposal includes an overly prescriptive request to amend nominating committee charter language;
|
›
|
The independence of the company's nominating committee;
|
›
|
Whether the company uses an outside search firm to identify potential director nominees; and
|
›
|
Whether the company has had recent controversies, fines, or litigation regarding equal employment practices.
|
Enabling the financial community to manage governance risk for the benefit of shareholders.
|
|
© 2017 ISS | Institutional Shareholder Services
|
16 of 17
|
|
The Global Leader In Corporate Governance
|
(a)
|
(i)
|
Certificate of Trust dated February 9, 2012 of ETF Series Solutions (the “Trust” or the “Registrant”) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a)(i) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 17, 2012.
|
|
(ii)
|
Registrant’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated February 17, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a)(ii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 17, 2012.
|
||
(b)
|
Registrant’s Amended and Restated Bylaws dated August 18, 2014, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (b) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 8, 2014.
|
||
(c)
|
Not applicable.
|
||
(d)
|
(i)
|
(A)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC dated December 23, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(i)(A) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 6, 2015.
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(i)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 18, 2015.
|
||
(C)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC (for Aerospace & Defense ETF, Drone ETF and Whetstone Energy Infrastructure ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(ii)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC and Mellon Capital Management Corporation dated December 23, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(ii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 28, 2016.
|
||
(iii)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC and Penserra Capital Management, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(v) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 31, 2014.
|
||
(iv)
|
(A)
|
Sub-Advisory Agreement between Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(iv)(A) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 6, 2015.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(iv)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 18, 2015.
|
||
(C)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC (for Aerospace & Defense ETF and Drone ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(v)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Validea Capital Management, LLC, dated November 17, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 5, 2014.
|
||
(vi)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on March 17, 2015.
|
||
(vii)
|
(A)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Global Investors, Inc. dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 22, 2015.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Global Investors, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(vii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 8, 2017.
|
||
(viii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and AlphaMark Advisors, LLC dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(viii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 20, 2015.
|
||
(ix)
|
(A)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and AlphaClone, Inc. dated September 28, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(x) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 23, 2015.
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and AlphaClone, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(ix)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 26, 2016.
|
||
(x)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between AlphaClone, Inc. and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC dated September 28, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xi) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 23, 2015.
|
||
(xi)
|
(A)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC dated February 18, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xi) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N‑1A, as filed on June 21, 2016.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xii)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC and Penserra Capital Management LLC dated February 18, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 21, 2016.
|
||
(xiii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Premise Capital, LLC dated April 14, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xiii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 22, 2016.
|
||
(xiv)
|
(A)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and CSat Investment Advisory, L.P., d/b/a ACSI Funds, dated July 14, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xiv) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on August 5, 2016.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and CSat Investment Advisory, L.P., d/b/a ACSI Funds is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xiv)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 14, 2017.
|
||
(xv)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and SerenityShares Investments LLC dated January 26, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xv) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 16, 2017.
|
||
(xvi)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between SerenityShares Investments LLC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC dated January 26, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xvi) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 16, 2017.
|
||
(xvii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and ClearShares, LLC dated April 27, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(xvii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 12, 2017.
|
||
(xviii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Point Bridge Capital, LLC – filed herewith.
|
||
(xix)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Point Bridge Capital, LLC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC – filed herewith.
|
||
(xx)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Nationwide Fund Advisors – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xxi)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Nationwide Fund Advisors and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xxii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Change Finance, PBC – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xxiii)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Change Finance, PBC and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xxiv)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and Advisors Asset Management, Inc. – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xxv)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vident Investment Advisory, LLC – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(e)
|
(i)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF) dated May 16, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(i) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 23, 2012.
|
|
(ii)
|
(A)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Vident ETFs) dated August 22, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(ii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 5, 2013.
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Vident ETFs) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(ii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 14, 2014.
|
||
(iii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Deep Value ETF) dated July 31, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(iii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 8, 2014.
|
||
(iv)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Validea Market Legends ETF) dated November 17, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(v) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 5, 2014.
|
||
(v)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Master Income ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 31, 2014.
|
||
(vi)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Diamond Hill Valuation-Weighted 500 ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on March 17, 2015.
|
||
(vii)
|
(A)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (U.S. Global Jets ETF) dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(vii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 22, 2015.
|
|
(B)
|
Amendment to the Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (U.S. Global ETFs) dated May 1, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(vii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 8, 2017.
|
||
(viii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(ix) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 20, 2015.
|
||
(ix)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xi) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 18, 2015.
|
||
(x)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (AlphaClone ETFs) dated August 17, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 23, 2015.
|
||
(xi)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Aerospace & Defense ETF and Drone ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Whetstone Energy Infrastructure ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xiii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Aptus Behavioral Momentum ETF) dated February 18, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xiv) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 21, 2016.
|
||
(xiv)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Premise Capital Frontier Advantage Diversified Tactical ETF) dated April 14, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xv) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 22, 2016.
|
||
(xv)
|
(A)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (American Customer Satisfaction Index ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xv) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on August 5, 2016.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (ACSI ETFs) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xv)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 31, 2017.
|
||
(xvi)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (SerenityShares ETFs) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xvi) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 16, 2017.
|
||
(xvii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (ClearShares OCIO ETF) dated April 27, 2017 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(xvii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 12, 2017.
|
||
(xviii)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Quasar Distributors, LLC (Aptus ETFs) — to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(xix)
|
Distribution Agreement between the Trust and Foreside Fund Services, LLC (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) – filed herewith.
|
(N)
|
Exhibit R to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (ClearShares OCIO ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(i)(N) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 12, 2017.
|
||
(O)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (Aerospace & Defense ETF and Drone ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(P)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (Whetstone Energy Infrastructure ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(Q)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) – filed herewith.
|
||
(R)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (Nationwide ETFs) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(S)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (Change Diversified Impact ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(T)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement (AAM ETFs) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(ii)
|
(A)
|
Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated May 16, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 23, 2012.
|
|
(B)
|
Amended Exhibit A (AlphaClone ETFs) and Amended Exhibit B (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 18, 2015.
|
||
(C)
|
Amended Exhibit C (Vident Funds) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 14, 2014.
|
||
(D)
|
Exhibit D (Deep Value ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement, dated July 31, 2014 are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(C) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 8, 2014.
|
||
(E)
|
Exhibit F (Validea Market Legends ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement dated November 17, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(D) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 5, 2014.
|
||
(F)
|
Exhibit G (Diamond Hill Valuation-Weighted 500 ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(E) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on March 17, 2015.
|
||
(G)
|
Exhibit H (Master Income ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(F) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 31, 2014.
|
||
(H)(1)
|
Amended Exhibit I (U.S. Global ETFs) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(G) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 22, 2015.
|
||
(H)(2)
|
Amended Exhibit I (U.S. Global ETFs) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(H)(2) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 8, 2017.
|
||
(I)
|
Exhibit J (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(H) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 20, 2015.
|
||
(J)(1)
|
Exhibit L (Aptus Behavioral Momentum ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(J) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 21, 2016.
|
||
(J)(2)
|
Amended Exhibit L (Aptus ETFs) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(K)
|
Exhibit N (Premise Capital Frontier Advantage Diversified Tactical ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(K) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 22, 2016.
|
||
(L)(1)
|
Exhibit M (American Customer Satisfaction Index ETF) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(L) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on August 5, 2016.
|
(L)(2)
|
Amended Exhibit M (ACSI ETFs) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(L)(2) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 31, 2017.
|
||
(M)
|
Exhibit O (SerenityShares ETFs) to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(O) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on February 16, 2017.
|
||
(N)
|
Exhibit Q to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (ClearShares OCIO ETF) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(ii)(N) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 12, 2017.
|
||
(O)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (Aerospace & Defense ETF and Drone ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(P)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (Whetstone Energy Infrastructure ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(Q)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) – filed herewith.
|
||
(R)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (Nationwide ETFs) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(S)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (Change Diversified Impact ETF) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(T)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement (AAM ETFs) – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(iii)
|
(A)
|
Transfer Agent Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated May 16, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(ii) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on May 23, 2012.
|
|
(B)
|
Amendment dated July 1, 2015 to Transfer Agent Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 6, 2015.
|
||
(C)
|
Amended Exhibit A (AlphaClone ETFs) and Amended Exhibit B (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(C) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 18, 2015.
|
||
(D)
|
Amended Exhibit C (Vident Funds) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(B) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on October 14, 2014.
|
||
(E)
|
Exhibit D (Deep Value ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement, dated July 31, 2014 are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(C) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on September 8, 2014.
|
||
(F)
|
Exhibit F (Validea Market Legends ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement dated November 17, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(D) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 5, 2014.
|
||
(G)
|
Exhibit G (Diamond Hill Valuation-Weighted 500 ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(E) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on March 17, 2015.
|
||
(H)
|
Exhibit H (Master Income ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(F) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on December 31, 2014.
|
||
(I)(1)
|
Amended Exhibit I (U.S. Global ETFs) to Transfer Agent Agreement dated February 19, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(G) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 22, 2015.
|
||
(I)(2)
|
Amended Exhibit I (U.S. Global ETFs) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(I)(2) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 8, 2017.
|
||
(J)
|
Exhibit J (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(H) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on April 20, 2015.
|
||
(K)(1)
|
Exhibit L (Aptus Behavioral Momentum ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(K) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on June 21, 2016.
|
||
(K)(2)
|
Amended Exhibit L (Aptus ETFs) to Transfer Agent Agreement – to be filed by subsequent amendment.
|
||
(L)
|
Exhibit N (Premise Capital Frontier Advantage Diversified Tactical ETF) to Transfer Agent Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h)(iii)(L)to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A, as filed on July 22, 2016.
|
Academy Funds Trust
|
Kirr Marbach Partners Funds, Inc.
|
Advisors Series Trust
|
LKCM Funds
|
Aegis Funds
|
LoCorr Investment Trust
|
Allied Asset Advisors Funds
|
Lord Asset Management Trust
|
Alpha Architect ETF Trust
|
MainGate Trust
|
Alpine Equity Trust
|
Managed Portfolio Series
|
Alpine Income Trust
|
Manager Directed Portfolios
|
Alpine Series Trust
|
Matrix Advisors Value Fund, Inc.
|
Angel Oak Funds Trust
|
Matrix Advisors Funds Trust
|
Appleton Funds
|
Merger Fund
|
Barrett Opportunity Fund, Inc.
|
Monetta Trust
|
Bridge Builder Trust
|
Nicholas Family of Funds, Inc.
|
Bridges Investment Fund, Inc.
|
Oaktree Funds
|
Brookfield Investment Funds
|
Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds, Inc.
|
Brown Advisory Funds
|
Perritt Funds, Inc.
|
Buffalo Funds
|
PRIMECAP Odyssey Funds
|
CG Funds Trust
|
Professionally Managed Portfolios
|
DoubleLine Funds Trust
|
Prospector Funds, Inc.
|
ETF Series Solutions
|
Provident Mutual Funds, Inc.
|
Evermore Funds Trust
|
Rainier Investment Management Mutual Funds
|
First American Funds, Inc.
|
RBC Funds Trust
|
FundX Investment Trust
|
Series Portfolio Trust
|
Glenmede Fund, Inc.
|
Stone Ridge Trust
|
Glenmede Portfolios
|
Stone Ridge Trust II
|
GoodHaven Funds Trust
|
Stone Ridge Trust III
|
Greenspring Fund, Inc.
|
Stone Ridge Trust V
|
Guinness Atkinson Funds
|
Thompson IM Funds, Inc.
|
Harding Loevner Funds, Inc.
|
Trust for Professional Managers
|
Hennessy Funds Trust
|
Trust for Advised Portfolios
|
Horizon Funds
|
USA Mutuals
|
Hotchkis & Wiley Funds
|
Victory Portfolios II
|
Intrepid Capital Management Funds Trust
|
Wall Street EWM Funds Trust
|
IronBridge Funds, Inc.
|
Westchester Capital Funds
|
Jacob Funds, Inc.
|
Wisconsin Capital Funds, Inc.
|
Jensen Portfolio, Inc.
|
YCG Funds
|
Signature
|
Title
|
*
/s/ Ronald T. Beckman
|
Trustee
|
Ronald T. Beckman
|
|
*
/s/ David A. Massart
|
Trustee
|
David A. Massart
|
|
*
/s/ Leonard M. Rush
|
Trustee
|
Leonard M. Rush
|
|
*
/s/ Michael A. Castino
|
Trustee
|
Michael A. Castino
|
|
*/s/ Paul R. Fearday
|
President
|
Paul R. Fearday
|
|
*/s/ Kristen M. Weitzel
|
Treasurer
|
Kristen M. Weitzel
|
|
*By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
Michael D. Barolsky, Attorney-in-Fact
pursuant to Powers of Attorney
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
(d)(xviii)
|
Investment Advisory Agreement with Point Bridge Capital, LLC
|
|
(d)(xix)
|
Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement with Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
|
(e)(xix)
|
Distribution Agreement with Foreside Fund Services, LLC
|
|
(e)(xxiv)
|
Form of Authorized Participant Agreement for Foreside Fund Services, LLC
|
|
(g)(i)(Q)
|
Exhibit to Custody Agreement
|
|
(h)(i)(Q)
|
Exhibit to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement
|
|
(h)(ii)(Q)
|
Exhibit to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement
|
|
(h)(iii)(R)
|
Exhibit to Transfer Agent Agreement
|
|
(h)(v)(B)
|
Amended Exhibit A to Compliance Services Agreement
|
|
(i)
|
Opinion and Consent of Counsel
|
|
(j)
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
(m)(i)(B)
|
Amended Schedule A to Rule 12b-1 Plan
|
|
(p)(xvii)
|
Code of Ethics for Point Bridge Capital, LLC
|
|
(p)(xxxi)
|
Code of Ethics for Foreside Fund Services, LLC
|
1. |
The Adviser’s Services
.
|
4. |
Brokerage
.
|
7. |
Representations, Warranties and Covenants
.
|
14. |
Certain Definitions
. For the purposes of this Agreement:
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
on behalf of the series listed on Schedule A
|
POINT BRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC
|
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
|
By:
/s/ Hal Lambert
|
|
Name:
M
ichael D. Barolsky
|
Name:
Hal Lambert
|
|
Title:
Vice President and Secretary
|
Title:
CEO
|
Fund
|
Rate
|
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
|
0.72%
|
To the Sub-Adviser at:
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
300 Colonial Center Parkway, Suite 330
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Attention: Denise Krisko
Email: dkrisko@videntinvestmentadvisory.com
|
POINT BRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC
By:
/s/ Hal Lambert
Name: Hal Lambert
Title: CEO
|
VIDENT INVESTMENT ADVISORY, LLC
By:
/s/ Denise Krisko
Name: Denise Krisko
Title: President
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
Title: Vice President and Secretary
|
Fund
|
Minimum Fee
|
Rate
|
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
|
$15,000
|
0.03% on the first $500 million;
0.02% on net assets in excess of $500 million
|
(a)
|
The Distributor represents and warrants that:
|
1.
|
(i) it is duly organized as a Delaware limited liability company and is and at all times will remain duly authorized and licensed under applicable law to carry out its services as contemplated herein; (ii) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement are within its power and have been duly authorized by all necessary action; (iii) its entering into this Agreement or providing the services contemplated hereby does not conflict with or constitute a default or require a consent under or breach of any provision of any agreement or document to which the Distributor is a party or by which it is bound; (iv) it is registered as a broker-dealer under the 1934 Act and is a member of FINRA; and (v) it has in place compliance policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Federal Securities Laws as that term is defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act.
|
2.
|
All activities by the Distributor and its agents and employees in connection with the services provided in this Agreement shall comply with the Registration Statement and Prospectus, the instructions of the Trust, and all applicable laws, rules and regulations including, without limitation, all rules and regulations made or adopted pursuant to the 1940 Act by the SEC or any securities association registered under the 1934 Act, including FINRA and the Listing Exchanges.
|
1.
|
(i) it is duly organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is and at all times will remain duly authorized to carry out its obligations as contemplated herein; (ii) it is registered as an investment company under the 1940 Act; (iii) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement are within its power and have been duly authorized by all necessary action; (iv) its entering into this Agreement does not conflict with or constitute a default or require a consent under or breach of any provision of any agreement or document to which the Trust is a party or by which it is bound; (v) the Registration Statement and each Fund’s Prospectus have been prepared, and all Marketing Materials shall be prepared, in all materials respects, in conformity with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC (the “Rules and Regulations”); and (vi) the Registration Statement and each Fund’s Prospectus contain, and all Marketing Materials shall contain, all statements required to be stated therein in accordance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act and the Rules and Regulations; (vii) all statements of fact contained therein, or to be contained in all Marketing Materials, are or will be true and correct in all material respects at the time indicated or the effective date, as the case may be, and none of the Registration Statement, any Fund’s Prospectus, nor any Marketing Materials shall include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the case of each Fund’s Prospectus in light of the circumstances in which made, not misleading; and (viii) except as otherwise noted in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, the offering price for all Creation Units will be the aggregate net asset value of the Shares per Creation Unit of the relevant Fund, as determined in the manner described in the Registration Statement and Prospectus;
|
2.
|
it shall file such amendment or amendments to the Registration Statement and each Fund’s Prospectus as, in the light of future developments, shall, in the opinion of the Trust’s counsel, be necessary in order to have the Registration Statement and each Fund’s Prospectus at all times contain all material facts required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which made, not misleading. The Trust shall not file any amendment to the Registration Statement that is expected to automatically become effective or for which the Trust will request effectiveness or each Fund’s Prospectus without giving the Distributor reasonable notice thereof in advance, provided that nothing in this Agreement shall in any way limit the Trust’s right to file at any time such amendments to the Registration Statement or any Fund’s Prospectus as the Trust may deem advisable. The Trust will also notify the Distributor in the event of any stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Trust shall not be deemed to make any representation or warranty as to any information or statement provided by the Distributor for inclusion in the Registration Statement or any Fund’s Prospectus; and
|
3.
|
upon delivery of Deposit or Fund Securities to an Authorized Participant in connection with a purchase or redemption of Creation Units, the Authorized Participant will acquire good and unencumbered title to such securities, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges and encumbrances, and not subject to any adverse claims and that such Fund and Deposit Securities will not be “restricted securities” as such term is used in Rule 144(a)(3)(i) under the 1933 Act.
|
(i)
To Foreside:
|
(ii)
If to the Trust:
|
Foreside Fund Services, LLC
Attn: Legal Department
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100
Portland, ME 04101
Telephone: (207) 553-7110
Facsimile: (207) 553-7151
Email:legal@foreside.com
With a copy to:
etp-services@foreside.com
|
ETF Series Solutions Trust
Attn: Michael D. Barolsky, Secretary
777 East Wisconsin Avenue, 10
th
Floor,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Phone: (414) 765-5586
Fax: (855) 223-0826
Email: Michael.barolsky@usbank.com
|
Foreside Fund Services, LLC
|
ETF Series Solutions
|
By: /s / Mark Fairbanks Mark Fairbanks, Vice President |
By: /s/ Michael D. Barolsky Name: Michael D. Barolsky Title: Vice President and Secretary |
1. |
STATUS,
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
OF PARTICIPANT
|
Foreside Fund Services, LLC
|
By: __________________________________________
|
Name: Mark Fairbanks
Title: Vice President
Address: Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100
Portland, Maine 04101
Telephone: 207-553-7100
Facsimile: 207-553-7151
E-mail: etp-services@foreside.com
Date:
________________________________________
|
[Name of Participant]
DTC/NSCC Clearing Participant Code:
|
By:
|
Name: ________________________________________
Title: _________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________
Telephone: ____________________________________
Facsimile: _____________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________
Date:
________________________________________
|
ACCEPTED BY:
|
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
as Index Receipt Agent
|
By: __________________________________________
|
Name: ________________________________________
Title: _________________________________________
Address: 615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Telephone: ____________________________________
Facsimile: _____________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________
Date:
________________________________________
|
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED, SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO SECTIONS 4(c) and 12(c) HEREOF:
|
ETF Series Solutions
|
By: __________________________________________
|
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
Title: Vice President and Secretary
Address: c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
777 E. Wisconsin Avenue
MK-WI-T10F
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Telephone: (414) 765-5586
Facsimile: (855) 223-0826
E-mail:
Michael.barolsky@usbank.com
Date:
________________________________________
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
|
U.S. BANK, N.A.
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
|
By:
/s/ Anita Zagrodnik
|
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
|
Name: Anita Zagrodnik
|
Title: Vice President and Secretary
|
Title: Senior Vice President
|
Point Bridge
|
1
|
§
|
$[ ] – Book entry DTC transaction, Federal Reserve transaction, principal paydown
|
§
|
$[ ] – Repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement, time deposit/CD or other non-depository transaction
|
§
|
$[ ] – Option/SWAPS/future contract written, exercised or expired
|
§
|
$[ ] – Mutual fund trade, Margin Variation Wire and outbound Fed wire
|
§
|
$[ ] – Physical security transaction
|
§
|
$[ ] – Check disbursement (waived if U.S. Bancorp is Administrator)
|
§
|
Additional fees apply for global servicing. Fund of Fund expenses quoted separately.
|
§
|
$[ ] – per Sub Advisor
|
§
|
$[ ] -- Segregated custody account
|
§
|
No charge for the initial conversion free receipt.
|
§
|
Overdrafts – charged to the account at prime interest rate plus [ ]%, unless a line of credit is in place
|
§
|
Monthly base fee for foreign securities $[ ]
|
§
|
Euroclear – Eurobonds only. Eurobonds are held in Euroclear at a standard rate, but other types of securities (including but not limited to equities, domestic market debt and mutual funds) will be subject to a surcharge. In addition, certain transactions that are delivered within Euroclear or from a Euroclear account to a third party depository or settlement system, will be subject to a surcharge.
|
§
|
For all other markets specified above, surcharges may apply if a security is held outside of the local market.
|
§
|
A transaction is defined as any purchase/sale, free receipt / free delivery, maturity, tender or exchange of a security.
|
§
|
Tax reclaims that have been outstanding for more than 6 (six) months with the client will be charged $[ ] per claim.
|
§
|
Charges incurred by U.S. Bank, N.A. directly or through sub-custodians for account opening fees, local taxes, stamp duties or other local duties and assessments, stock exchange fees, foreign exchange transactions, postage and insurance for shipping, facsimile reporting, extraordinary telecommunications fees, proxy services and other shareholder communications, recurring administration fees, negative interest charges, overdraft charges or other expenses which are unique to a country in which the client or its clients is investing will be passed along as incurred.
|
§
|
A surcharge may be added to certain miscellaneous expenses listed herein to cover handling, servicing and other administrative costs associated with the activities giving rise to such expenses. Also, certain expenses are charged at a predetermined flat rate.
|
§
|
SWIFT reporting and message fees.
|
Country
|
Instrument
|
Safekeeping
(BPS)
|
Transaction
Fee
|
Country
|
Instrument
|
Safekeeping
(BPS)
|
Transaction
Fee
|
|
Argentina
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Lebanon
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Australia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Lithuania
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Austria
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Luxembourg
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Bahrain
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Malaysia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Bangladesh
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Mali
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Belgium
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Malta
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Benin
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Mauritius
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Bermuda
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Mexico
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Botswana
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Morocco
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Brazil
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Namibia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Bulgaria
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Netherlands
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Burkina Faso
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
New Zealand
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Canada
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Niger
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Cayman Islands*
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Nigeria
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Channel Islands*
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Norway
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Chile
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Oman
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
China
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Pakistan
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Columbia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Peru
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Costa Rica
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Phillipines
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Croatia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Poland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Cyprus
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Portugal
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Czech Republic
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Qatar
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Denmark
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Romania
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Ecuador
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Russia
|
Equities
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Egypt
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Senegal
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Estonia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Singapore
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Euromarkets**
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Slovak Republic
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Finland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Slovenia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
France
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
South Africa
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Germany
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
South Korea
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Ghana
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Spain
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Greece
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Sri Lanka
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Guinea Bissau
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Swaziland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Hong Kong
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Sweden
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Hungary
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Switzerland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Iceland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Taiwan
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
India
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Thailand
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Indonesia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Togo
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Ireland
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Tunisia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Israel
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Turkey
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Italy
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
UAE
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Ivory Coast
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
United Kingdom
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Japan
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Ukraine
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Jordan
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Uruguay
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Venezuela
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Kenya
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Vietnam
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Kuwait
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
Zambia
|
All
|
____
|
$____
|
|
Latvia
|
Equities
|
____
|
$____
|
Zimbabwe
|
All
|
________
|
$____
|
Point Bridge
|
5
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
|
U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
|
By:
/s/ Anita Zagrodnik
|
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
|
Name: Anita Zagrodnik
|
Title: Secretary
|
Title: Senior Vice President
|
Point Bridge
|
1
|
§
|
Subsequent new fund launch – $[ ] per fund or as negotiated
|
§
|
Passively Managed ETF Relief $[ ]
|
§
|
Actively Managed ETF Relief $[ ]
|
§
|
$[ ] first fund
|
§
|
$[ ] each additional fund up to 5 funds
|
§
|
Fees negotiated for funds 6+
|
§
|
Postage, if necessary
|
§
|
Federal and state regulatory filing fees
|
§
|
Expenses from Board of Trustee meetings
|
§
|
Third party auditing
|
§
|
EDGAR/XBRL filing
|
§
|
All other Miscellaneous expenses
|
Point Bridge
|
2
|
Point Bridge
|
3
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Equities, Options, ADRs, Foreign Equities, Futures, Forwards, Currency Rates, Mutual Funds, ETFs
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Corporates, Domestic Convertibles, Domestic Governments, Domestic Agencies, Mortgage Backed, Municipal Bonds
|
§
|
$[ ] – CMOs, Money Market Instruments, Foreign Corporates, Foreign Convertibles, Foreign Governments, Foreign Agencies, Asset Backed, High Yield
|
§
|
$[ ] – Interest Rate Swaps, Foreign Currency Swaps, Total Return Swaps, Total Return Bullet Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] – Bank Loans
|
§
|
$[ ] – Swaptions
|
§
|
$[ ] – Intraday money market funds pricing, up to 3 times per day
|
§
|
$[ ] – Credit Default Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] per Month Manual Security Pricing (>25per day)
|
§
|
$[ ] per Foreign Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per Domestic Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per CMOs, Asset Backed, Mortgage Backed Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] for the first fund
|
§
|
$[ ] for each additional fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per sub-advisor per fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per security per month for fund administrative
|
§ |
$[ ] per fund per standard reporting package*
|
§ |
Additional 15c reporting is subject to additional charges
|
- |
Expense reporting package: 2 peer comparison reports (adviser fee) and (net expense ratio w classes on one report) OR Full 15(c) report
|
Point Bridge
|
4
|
Point Bridge
|
5
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
|
U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
|
By:
/s/ Anita Zagrodnik
|
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
|
Name: Anita Zagrodnik
|
Title: Secretary
|
Title: Senior Vice President
|
Point Bridge
|
1
|
|
Point Bridge
|
2
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Equities, Options, ADRs, Foreign Equities, Futures, Forwards, Currency Rates, Mutual Funds, ETFs
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Corporates, Domestic Convertibles, Domestic Governments, Domestic Agencies, Mortgage Backed, Municipal Bonds
|
§
|
$[ ] – CMOs, Money Market Instruments, Foreign Corporates, Foreign Convertibles, Foreign Governments, Foreign Agencies, Asset Backed, High Yield
|
§
|
$[ ] – Interest Rate Swaps, Foreign Currency Swaps, Total Return Swaps, Total Return Bullet Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] – Bank Loans
|
§
|
$[ ] – Swaptions
|
§
|
$[ ] – Intraday money market funds pricing, up to 3 times per day
|
§
|
$[ ] – Credit Default Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] per Month Manual Security Pricing (>25per day)
|
§
|
$[ ] per Foreign Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per Domestic Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per CMOs, Asset Backed, Mortgage Backed Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] for the first fund
|
§
|
$[ ] for each additional fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per sub-advisor per fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per security per month for fund administrative
|
§ |
$[ ] per fund per standard reporting package*
|
§ |
Additional 15c reporting is subject to additional charges
|
- |
Expense reporting package: 2 peer comparison reports (adviser fee) and (net expense ratio w classes on one report) OR Full 15(c) report
|
Point Bridge
|
1
|
Point Bridge
|
4
|
ETF SERIES SOLUTIONS
|
U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC
|
By:
/s/ Michael D. Barolsky
|
By:
/s/ Anita Zagrodnik
|
Name: Michael D. Barolsky
|
Name: Anita Zagrodnik
|
Title: Secretary
|
Title: Senior Vice President
|
Point Bridge
|
1
|
|
§
|
Subsequent new fund launch – $[ ] per fund or as negotiated
|
§
|
Actively-managed ETF $[ ]
|
§
|
Passively-managed ETF $[ ]
|
§
|
Postage, if necessary
|
§
|
Federal and state regulatory filing fees
|
§
|
Expenses from Board of Trustee meetings
|
§
|
Third party auditing
|
§
|
EDGAR/XBRL filing
|
§
|
All other Miscellaneous expenses
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Equities, Options, ADRs, Foreign Equities, Futures, Forwards, Currency Rates, Mutual Funds, ETFs
|
§
|
$[ ] – Domestic Corporates, Domestic Convertibles, Domestic Governments, Domestic Agencies, Mortgage Backed, Municipal Bonds
|
§
|
$[ ] – CMOs, Money Market Instruments, Foreign Corporates, Foreign Convertibles, Foreign Governments, Foreign Agencies, Asset Backed, High Yield
|
§
|
$[ ] – Interest Rate Swaps, Foreign Currency Swaps, Total Return Swaps, Total Return Bullet Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] – Bank Loans
|
§
|
$[ ] – Swaptions
|
§
|
$[ ] – Intraday money market funds pricing, up to 3 times per day
|
§
|
$[ ] – Credit Default Swaps
|
§
|
$[ ] per Month Manual Security Pricing (>25per day)
|
§
|
$[ ] per Foreign Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per Domestic Equity Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] per CMOs, Asset Backed, Mortgage Backed Security per Month
|
§
|
$[ ] for the first fund
|
§
|
$[ ] for each additional fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per sub-advisor per fund
|
§
|
$[ ] per security per month for fund administrative
|
§ |
$[ ] per fund per standard reporting package*
|
§ |
Additional 15c reporting is subject to additional charges
|
- |
Expense reporting package: 2 peer comparison reports (adviser fee) and (net expense ratio w classes on one report) OR Full 15(c) report
|
Point Bridge
|
5
|
|
Fund Name
|
Adviser
|
Sub-Adviser
|
Date of Appointment
|
AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
May 13, 2013
|
Vident International Equity Fund
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
August 22, 2013
|
Vident Core U.S. Equity Fund
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
November 14, 2013
|
Deep Value ETF
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Mellon Capital Management Corporation
|
February 26, 2014
|
Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
September 2, 2014
|
Validea Market Legends ETF
|
Validea Capital Management LLC
|
N/A
|
November 17, 2014
|
Diamond Hill Valuation-Weighted 500 ETF
|
Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc.
|
N/A
|
November 17, 2014
|
Master Income ETF
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Penserra Capital Management, LLC
|
November 17, 2014
|
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
|
AlphaMark Advisors, LLC
|
N/A
|
February 19, 2015
|
U.S. Global Jets ETF
|
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
N/A
|
February 19, 2015
|
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
|
Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
August 17, 2015
|
AlphaClone International ETF
|
Coefficient Capital, Inc.
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
August 17, 2015
|
Aptus Behavioral Momentum ETF
|
Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC
|
Penserra Capital Management, LLC
|
February 18, 2016
|
Premise Capital Frontier Advantage Diversified Tactical ETF
|
Premise Capital, LLC
|
N/A
|
April 14, 2016
|
American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF
|
CSat Investment Advisory, L.P.
|
N/A
|
July 14, 2016
|
SerenityShares Impact ETF
|
SerenityShares Investments LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
January 26, 2017
|
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
ClearShares LLC
|
N/A
|
April 27, 2017
|
Brand Value ETF
|
CSat Investment Advisory, L.P.
|
N/A
|
April 27, 2017
|
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
|
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
N/A
|
May 1, 2017
|
Reverse Cap Weighted U.S. Large Cap ETF
|
CSat Investment Advisory, L.P.
|
N/A
|
July 11, 2017
|
U.S. Global Tematica Luxury Goods ETF
|
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
|
N/A
|
November 16, 2015
|
Nationwide Risk-Based U.S. Equity ETF
|
Nationwide Fund Advisors
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
April 27, 2017
|
Nationwide Risk-Based International Equity ETF
|
Nationwide Fund Advisors
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
April 27, 2017
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification U.S. Core Equity ETF
|
Nationwide Fund Advisors
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
April 27, 2017
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification Emerging Markets Core Equity ETF
|
Nationwide Fund Advisors
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
April 27, 2017
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification International Core Equity ETF
|
Nationwide Fund Advisors
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
April 27, 2017
|
Aptus Fortified Value ETF
|
Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC
|
N/A
|
July 13, 2017
|
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
|
Point Bridge Capital, LLC
|
Vident Investment Advisory, LLC
|
July 13, 2017
|
Re:
|
ETF Series Solutions
|
(a) |
A certificate of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, dated as of a recent date, as to the existence of the Trust;
|
(b) |
A copy, certified by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, of the Trust’s Certificate of Trust, filed with the Secretary of State (the “Certificate of Trust”);
|
(c) |
A certificate executed by the Secretary of the Trust, certifying as to, and attaching copies of, the Trust’s Certificate of Trust, Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the “Declaration”), the Trust’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), and the resolutions adopted by the Trustees of the Trust authorizing the issuance of the Shares of the Fund (the “Resolutions”); and
|
(d) |
A printer’s proof of the Registration Statement.
|
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
|
|||
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
|
|||
Washington, DC 20004
|
+1.202.739.3000
|
||
United States
|
+1.202.739.3001
|
Series of ETF Series Solutions
|
Rule 12b-1 Fee
|
AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Vident International Equity Fund
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Vident Core U.S. Equity Fund
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Deep Value ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Validea Market Legends ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Diamond Hill Valuation-Weighted 500 ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Master Income ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
U.S. Global Jets ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
U.S. Global Weiss ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
AlphaClone Small Cap ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
AlphaClone International ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
AlphaClone Value ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
AlphaClone Activist ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
U.S. Global Luxury Goods ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Aptus Behavioral Momentum ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Aerospace & Defense ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Drone ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Premise Capital Frontier Advantage Diversified Tactical ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
SerenityShares Core U.S. ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
SerenityShares Core Multi-Asset ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
SerenityShares Impact ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Brand Value ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Reverse Cap Weighted U.S. Large Cap ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Aptus Fortified Value ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Nationwide Risk-Based U.S. Equity ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Nationwide Risk-Based International Equity ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification U.S. Core Equity ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification Emerging Markets Core Equity ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
Nationwide Maximum Diversification International Core Equity ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
U.S. Global Tematica Luxury Goods ETF
|
0.25% of average daily net assets
|
a)
|
Clients’ interests must always take priority. In the course of performing one’s duties and responsibilities, Supervised Persons must, at all times, place the interests of our Clients ahead of one’s own personal interests.
|
b)
|
Conflicts of interest (or even the appearance of conflicts) must be avoided. Supervised Persons must not take advantage of the trust that Clients have placed in them or the Advisor. All Supervised Persons must avoid any situation that might present a conflict or the perception of a conflict. All Supervised Persons must avoid situations that might be perceived as an impropriety or a compromise to the Supervised Person’s fulfillment of his/her duties and responsibilities.
|
a)
|
employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud or disadvantage a Client;
|
b)
|
make any untrue statements of a material fact to a Client or omit to state to a Client any material fact[s] that are necessary to make the statements made (in light of the circumstances under which they are made) not misleading;
|
c)
|
engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a Client;
|
d)
|
engage in any manipulative practice with respect to a Client;
|
e)
|
use one’s position[s], or any investment opportunities presented by virtue of their position[s], to one’s personal advantage or to the detriment of a Client; or
|
f)
|
conduct personal trading activities in contravention of the COE or applicable legal principles or in such a manner as may be inconsistent with the duties owed to Clients as a fiduciary.
|
·
|
violation[s] of the Securities Laws;
|
·
|
misuse of corporate assets;
|
·
|
misuse of nonpublic information; or
|
·
|
failure to follow any provision set forth in the COE.
|
·
|
Being employed or compensated by any other entity;
|
·
|
Engaging in any other business including part-time, evening or weekend employment;
|
·
|
Serving as an officer, director, partner, etc., in any other entity;
|
·
|
Ownership interest in any non-publicly traded company or other private investments; or,
|
·
|
Any public speaking or writing activities.
|
·
|
civil injunctions;
|
·
|
treble damages;
|
·
|
disgorgement of profits;
|
·
|
jail sentences and fines for the individual who committed the violation of up to three (3) times the profit gained or loss avoided, whether or not the individual actually benefited; and/or
|
·
|
fine[s] for the Advisor and/or other controlling person of up to the greater of $1,000,000 or three (3) times the amount of the profit gained or loss avoided.
|
·
|
Direct obligations of the United States Government;
|
·
|
Bankers’ Acceptances;
|
·
|
Bank Certificates of Deposit (“CDs”);
|
·
|
Commercial Paper;
|
·
|
Other High Quality Short-term Debt Instruments, including Repurchase Agreements;
|
·
|
Shares issued by Money Market Funds;
|
·
|
Open-end Mutual Funds; and
|
·
|
Closed-end Funds and Unit Investment Trusts (“UIT’s”).
|
·
|
securities currently on the Restricted List;
|
·
|
initial public offerings;
|
·
|
private placements;
|
·
|
any securities that may be potentially affected by inside information that the Advisor or Access Person may possess;
|
·
|
market timing;
|
·
|
front running;
|
·
|
participating in block trades to the disadvantage of Clients;
|
·
|
trading activity in contravention to advice given to Clients.
|
·
|
a description of issues that have arisen under the COE since the last reporting period including such items as any violations of the COE;
|
·
|
sanctions imposed in response to the violations; and
|
·
|
changes in the COE and any recommended changes.
|
INTRODUCTION
|
1
|
|
1. |
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
|
2
|
(a)
Fiduciary Duties
|
2
|
|
(b)
Compliance with Laws
|
2
|
|
(c)
Corporate Culture
|
2
|
|
(d)
Professional Misconduct
|
3
|
|
(e)
Disclosure of Conflicts
|
3
|
|
(f)
Undue Influence
|
3
|
|
(g)
Confidentiality and Protection of Material Nonpublic Information
|
3
|
|
(h)
Personal Securities Transactions
|
4
|
|
(i)
Gifts
|
4
|
|
(j)
Service on Boards
|
4
|
|
(k)
Prohibition Against Market Timing
|
4
|
|
2. |
WHO IS COVERED BY THIS CODE
|
4
|
3. |
PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
|
5
|
(a)
Blackout Period
|
5
|
|
(b)
Requirement for Pre-clearance
|
5
|
|
(c)
Fund Officer Prohibition
|
5
|
|
4. |
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF ACCESS PERSONS
|
6
|
(a)
Reporting
|
6
|
|
(b)
Exceptions from Reporting Requirement of Section 4
|
6
|
|
(c)
Initial Holdings Reports
|
6
|
|
(d)
Quarterly Transaction Reports
|
6
|
|
(e)
New Account Opening; Quarterly New Account Report
|
7
|
|
(f)
Annual Holdings Reports
|
7
|
|
(g)
Alternative Reporting
|
7
|
|
(h)
Report Qualification
|
8
|
|
(i)
Providing Access to Account Information
|
8
|
|
(j)
Confidentiality of Reports
|
8
|
|
5.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
|
8
|
|
6. REPORTING VIOLATIONS
|
9
|
|
7. |
TRAINING
|
9
|
8. |
REVIEW OFFICER
|
9
|
(a)
Duties of Review Officer
|
9
|
|
(b)
Potential Trade Conflict
|
10
|
|
(c)
Required Records
|
10
|
|
(d)
Post-Trade Review Process
|
11
|
|
(e)
Submission to Fund Board
|
11
|
|
(f)
Report to the Risk Committee
|
12
|
|
Appendix A
- Foreside Companies
|
13
|
|
Appendix B
- Definitions
|
14
|
|
Attachment A
– Access Person Acknowledgement
|
16
|
|
Attachment B – Pre-Clearance Request Form |
17
|
1.
|
establishes standards of professional conduct;
|
2.
|
establishes standards and procedures for the detection and prevention of activities by which persons having knowledge of the investments and investment intentions of a Fund may abuse their fiduciary duties to the Fund; and
|
3.
|
addresses other types of conflict of interest situations.
|
Ø
|
the principal underwriter is an affiliated person of the Fund or of the Fund’s adviser, or
|
Ø
|
an officer, director or general partner of the principal underwriter serves as an officer, director or general partner of the Fund or of the Fund’s investment adviser.
|
1.
|
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
|
(a)
|
Fiduciary Duties
. Each Company and its Access Persons are fiduciaries and at all times shall:
|
Ø
|
act solely for the benefit of the Funds; and
|
Ø
|
place each Fund’s interests above their own.
|
(b)
|
Compliance with Laws
. Access Persons shall maintain knowledge of and comply with all applicable federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations, and shall not knowingly participate or assist in any violation of such laws, rules or regulations.
|
(i)
|
employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud a Fund or engage in any manipulative practice with respect to a Fund;
|
(ii)
|
make to a Fund any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state to a Fund a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading;
|
(iii)
|
engage in any act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a Fund; or
|
(iv)
|
engage in any manipulative practice with respect to securities, including price manipulation.
|
Ø
|
trade based upon inside information, especially where Fund trades are likely to be pending or imminent; or
|
Ø
|
use or share knowledge of any material nonpublic information of a Fund for personal gain or benefit or for the personal gain or benefit of others.
|
2.
|
WHO IS COVERED BY THIS CODE
|
3.
|
PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
|
(b)
|
Requirement for Pre-clearance
. Access Persons must obtain
prior
written approval from the Review Officer before:
|
(i)
|
directly or indirectly acquiring beneficial ownership in securities in an initial public offering for which no public market in the same or similar securities of the issue has previously existed;
|
(ii)
|
directly or indirectly acquiring beneficial ownership in securities in a private placement; and
|
(iii)
|
directly or indirectly purchasing, selling or acquiring shares of a Reportable Fund for which they are an Access Person.
|
4.
|
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF ACCESS PERSONS
|
(i)
|
any report with respect to securities held in accounts over which the Access Person had no direct or indirect influence or control;
|
(ii)
|
a quarterly transaction report with respect to transactions effected pursuant to an automatic investment plan. However, any transaction that overrides the pre-set schedule or allocations of the automatic investment plan must be included in a quarterly transaction report;
|
(iii)
|
a quarterly transaction report with respect to transactions effected which were non-volitional on the part of the Access Person, including acquisitions of Reportable Securities by gift or inheritance; or
|
(iv)
|
a quarterly transaction report if the report would duplicate information contained in broker trade confirmations or account statements that the Company holds in its records so long as the Company receives the confirmations or statements no later than thirty (30) days after the end of the applicable calendar quarter.
|
(i)
|
the title, type of security, and as applicable the exchange ticker symbol or CUSIP number, number of shares and principal amount of each Reportable Security (whether or not publicly traded) in which the person has any direct or indirect beneficial ownership as of the date the person became an Access Person;
|
(ii)
|
the name of any broker, dealer or bank with whom the person maintains an account in which any securities were held for the Access Person’s direct or indirect benefit as of the date the person became an Access Person; and
|
(iii)
|
the date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.
|
(i)
|
the date of the transaction, the title, and as applicable the exchange ticker symbol or CUSIP number, the interest rate and maturity date (if applicable), the number of shares and the principal amount of each Reportable Security involved;
|
(ii)
|
the nature of the transaction (i.e., purchase, sale or any other type of acquisition or disposition);
|
(iii)
|
the price of the Reportable Security at which the transaction was effected;
|
(iv)
|
the name of the broker, dealer or bank with or through which the transaction was effected; and
|
(v)
|
the date that the report is submitted.
|
(e)
|
New Account Opening; Quarterly New Account Report
. Each Access Person shall provide written notice to the Review Officer
prior
to opening any new account with any entity through which a Reportable Securities (whether or not publicly traded) transaction may be effected for which the Access Person has direct or indirect beneficial ownership.
|
(1)
|
the name of the broker, dealer or bank with whom the Access Person has established the account;
|
(2)
|
the date the account was established; and
|
(3)
|
the date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.
|
(f)
|
Annual Holdings Reports
. Annually, each Access Person must report the following information (which information must be current as of a date no more than forty-five
|
(45)
|
days before the report is submitted):
|
(i)
|
the title, type of security, and as applicable the exchange ticker symbol or CUSIP number, number of shares and principal amount of each Reportable Security (whether or not publicly traded) in which the Access Person had any direct or indirect beneficial ownership;
|
(ii)
|
the name of any broker, dealer or bank with whom the Access Person maintained an account in which any securities are held for the Access Person’s direct or indirect benefit; and
|
(iii)
|
the date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.
|
(g)
|
Alternative Reporting
. The submission to the Review Officer of duplicate broker trade confirmations and account statements on all securities transactions required to be reported under this Section shall satisfy the reporting requirements of Section 4. The annual holdings report may be satisfied by confirming annually, in writing, the accuracy of the information delivered by, or on behalf of, the Access Person to the Review Officer and recording the date of the confirmation.
|
(h)
|
Report Qualification
. Any report may contain a statement that the report shall not be construed as an admission by the person making the report that he or she has any direct or indirect beneficial ownership in the Reportable Securities to which the report relates.
|
(i)
|
Providing Access to Account Information
. Access Persons will promptly:
|
(i)
|
provide full access to a Fund, its agents and attorneys to any and all records and documents which a Fund considers relevant to any securities transactions or other matters subject to the Code;
|
(ii)
|
cooperate with a Fund, or its agents and attorneys, in investigating any securities transactions or other matter subject to the Code;
|
(iii)
|
provide a Fund, its agents and attorneys with an explanation (in writing if requested) of the facts and circumstances surrounding any securities transaction or other matter subject to the Code; and
|
(iv)
|
promptly notify the Review Officer or such other individual as a Fund may direct, in writing, from time to time, of any incident of noncompliance with the Code by anyone subject to this Code.
|
(j)
|
Confidentiality of Reports
. Transaction and holdings reports will be maintained in confidence, except to the extent necessary to implement and enforce the provisions of this Code or to comply with requests for information from regulatory or government agencies or law enforcement where applicable.
|
5.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
|
Ø
|
read, understood and complied with all the requirements of the Code;
|
Ø
|
disclosed or reported all personal securities transactions pursuant to the requirements of the Code; and
|
Ø
|
not engaged in any prohibited conduct.
|
6.
|
REPORTING VIOLATIONS
|
Ø
|
Noncompliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;
|
Ø
|
Fraud or illegal acts involving any aspect of the Company’s business;
|
Ø
|
Material misstatements in regulatory filings, internal books and records, Fund records or reports;
|
Ø
|
Activity that is harmful to a Fund, including Fund shareholders; and
|
Ø
|
Deviations from required controls and procedures that safeguard a Fund or a Company.
|
7.
|
TRAINING
|
8.
|
REVIEW OFFICER
|
(a)
|
Duties of Review Officer
. The President of Foreside has been appointed by the President of each Company as the Review Officer to:
|
(i)
|
review all securities transaction and holdings reports and maintain the names of persons responsible for reviewing these reports;
|
(ii)
|
identify all persons of each Company who are Access Persons subject to this Code, promptly inform each Access Person of the requirements of this Code and provide them with a copy of the Code and any amendments;
|
(iii)
|
compare, on a quarterly basis, all Reportable Securities transactions with each Fund’s completed portfolio transactions to determine whether a Code violation may have occurred;
|
(iv)
|
maintain signed acknowledgments and certifications by each Access Person who is then subject to this Code, in the form of
Attachment A
;
|
(v)
|
inform all Access Persons of their requirements to obtain prior written approval from the Review Officer prior to directly or indirectly acquiring beneficial ownership of a security in any private placement, initial public offering or Reportable Fund;
|
(vi)
|
ensure that Access Persons receive adequate training on the principles and procedures of this Code;
|
(vii)
|
review, at least annually, the adequacy of this Code and the effectiveness of its implementation; and
|
(viii)
|
submit a written report to a Fund’s Board and Foreside’s Risk Committee as described in Section 8(e) and (f), respectively.
|
(b)
|
Potential Trade Conflict
. When there appears to be a Reportable Securities transaction that conflicts with the Code, the Review Officer shall request a written explanation from the Access Person with regard to the transaction. If, after post-trade review, it is determined that there has been a material violation of the Code, a report will be made by the Review Officer with a recommendation of appropriate action to be taken to the Risk Committee of Foreside, the President of each Company, where applicable, the Chief Compliance Officer of each Company’s Broker-Dealer, where applicable, and a Fund’s Board of Trustees (or Directors), where applicable.
|
(c)
|
Required Records
. The Review Officer shall maintain and cause to be maintained:
|
(i)
|
a copy of any code of ethics adopted by each Company that is in effect, or at any time within the past five (5) years was in effect, in an easily accessible place;
|
(ii)
|
a record of any violation of any code of ethics, and of any action taken as a result of such violation, in an easily accessible place for at least five (5) years after the end of the fiscal year in which the last entry was made on any such report, the first two (2) years in an easily accessible place;
|
(iii)
|
a copy of each holdings and transaction report (including duplicate confirmations and statements) made by anyone subject to this Code as required by Section 4 for at least five (5) years after the end of the fiscal year in which the report is made, the first two (2) years in an easily accessible place;
|
(iv)
|
a record of all written acknowledgements and certifications by each Access Person who is currently, or within the past five (5) years was, an Access Person (records must be kept for 5 years after individual ceases to be a Access Person under the Code);
|
(v)
|
a list of all persons who are currently, or within the past five years were , required to make reports or who were responsible for reviewing these reports pursuant to any code of ethics adopted by each Company, in an easily accessible place;
|
(vi)
|
a copy of each written report and certification required pursuant to Section 8(e) of this Code for at least five (5) years after the end of the fiscal year in which it is made, the first two (2) years in an easily accessible place;
|
(vii)
|
a record of any decision, and the reasons supporting the decision, approving the acquisition of securities by Access Persons under Section 3(b) of this Code, for at least five (5) years after the end of the fiscal year in which the approval is granted; and
|
(viii)
|
a record of any decision, and the reasons supporting the decision, granting an Access Person a waiver from, or exception to, the Code for at least five (5) years after the end of the fiscal year in which the waiver is granted.
|
(d)
|
Post-Trade Review Process
. Following receipt of trade confirms and statements, transactions will be screened by the Review Officer (or his or her designee) for the following:
|
(i)
|
same day trades
: transactions by Access Persons occurring on the same day as the purchase or sale of the same security by a Fund for which they are an Access Person.
|
(ii)
|
blackout period trades
: transactions by Access Persons occurring within 24 hours before or after the time as the purchase or sale of the same security by a Fund for which they are an Access Person.
|
(iii)
|
fraudulent conduct
: transaction by Access Persons which, within the most recent fifteen (15) days, is or has been held by a Fund or is being or has been considered by a Fund for purchase by a Fund.
|
(iv)
|
market timing of Reportable Funds
: transactions by Access Persons that appear to be market timing of Reportable Funds.
|
(v)
|
other activities
: transactions which may give the appearance that an Access Person has executed transactions not in accordance with this Code or otherwise reflect patterns of abuse.
|
(e)
|
Submission to Fund Board
.
|
(i)
|
The Review Officer shall, at a minimum, annually prepare a written report to the Board of Trustees (or Directors) of a Fund listed in the List of Access Persons & Reportable Funds maintained by the Review Officer that:
|
A.
|
describes any issues under this Code or its procedures since the last report to the Trustees (or Directors), including, but not limited to, information about material violations of the code or procedures and sanctions imposed in response to the material violations; and
|
B.
|
certifies that each Company has adopted procedures reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating this Code.
|
(ii)
|
The Review Officer shall ensure that this Code and any material amendments are submitted to the Board of Trustees (or Directors) for approval for those funds listed in the List of Access Persons & Reportable Funds maintained by the Review Officer.
|
(f)
|
Report to the Risk Committee
. The Review Officer shall prepare a written report to the Risk Committee of Foreside (and the President of each Company, where applicable, and the Chief Compliance Officer of each Company’s Broker- Dealer, where applicable) regarding any material issues that arose during the year under the Code, including, but not limited to, material violations of and sanctions under the Code.
|
(a)
|
Access Person
:
|
(b)
|
Beneficial Owner
shall have the meaning as that set forth in Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except that the determination of direct or indirect beneficial ownership shall apply to all Reportable Securities that an Access Person owns or acquires. A beneficial owner of a security is any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, has or shares a
direct or indirect pecuniary interest
(the opportunity, directly or indirectly, to profit or share in any profit derived from a transaction in the subject securities) in a security. An Access Person is presumed to be a beneficial owner of securities that are held by his or her immediate family members sharing the Access Person’s household.
|
(c)
|
Indirect pecuniary interest
in a security includes securities held by a person’s immediate family sharing the same household.
Immediate family
means any child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law (including adoptive relationships).
|
(d)
|
Control
means the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of an entity, unless this power is solely the result of an official position with the company. Ownership of 25% or more of a company’s outstanding voting securities is presumed to give the holder thereof control over the company. This presumption may be rebutted by the Review Officer based upon the facts and circumstances of a given situation.
|
(e)
|
Purchase or sale
includes, among other things, the writing of an option to purchase or sell a Reportable Security.
|
(f)
|
Reportable Fund
(see List of Access Persons & Reportable Funds maintained by the Review Officer) means any fund that triggers the Company’s compliance with a Rule 17j-1 Code of Ethics or any fund for which an employee or agent of the Company serves as a Fund Officer.
|
(g)
|
Reportable Security
means any security such as a stock, bond, future, investment contract or any other instrument that is considered a ‘security’ under Section 2(a)(36) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, except:
|
(i)
|
direct obligations of the Government of the United States;
|
(ii)
|
bankers’ acceptances and bank certificates of deposits;
|
(iii)
|
commercial paper and debt instruments with a maturity at issuance of less than 366 days and that are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization;
|
(iv)
|
repurchase agreements covering any of the foregoing;
|
(v)
|
shares issued by money market mutual funds;
|
(vi)
|
shares of SEC registered open-end investment companies (
other than a
Reportable Fund
); and
|
(vii)
|
shares of unit investment trusts that are invested exclusively in one or more open- end funds, none of which are Reportable Funds.
|
Ø
|
Shares of a Reportable Fund;
|
Ø
|
Options on securities, on indexes, and on currencies;
|
Ø
|
All kinds of limited partnerships;
|
Ø
|
Foreign unit trusts, UCITs, SICAVs and foreign mutual funds; and
|
Ø
|
Private investment funds, hedge funds and investment clubs.
|
(h)
|
Security held or to be acquired by
the Fund means
|
(i)
|
any Reportable Security which, within the most recent fifteen (15) days (x) is or has been held by the applicable Fund or (y) is being or has been considered by the applicable Fund or its investment adviser for purchase by the applicable Fund; and
|
(ii)
|
and any option to purchase or sell, and any security convertible into or exchangeable for, a Reportable Security.
|
Signature
|
Date
|
|
Printed Name
|
Received By:
|
Date:
|
1.
|
Name of security/investment:
|
2.
|
Type of security/interest:
|
3.
|
Name of brokerage firm/other entity:
|
4.
|
Account number:
|
5.
|
Type of transaction (buy/sell/other-specify):
|
6.
|
Number of shares/interest:
|
7.
|
Price of each security/interest:
|
8.
|
Name of firm offering the investment opportunity:
|
9.
|
Please describe how you became aware of this investment opportunity:
|
|
Signature
|
Date
|
Print Name
|
Job Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Signature
|
Date
|